{"meta":{"query_hash":"2af6451a2087","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Risk"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2af6451a2087","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Risk"},"results":[{"id":"W2205746712","doi":"10.21314/jor.2003.075","title":"Space–time diversification: which dimension is better?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Risk","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Portfolio; Asset allocation; Economics; Financial economics; Investment (military); Capital asset pricing model; Investment strategy; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.019255731812837806,"score_gpt":0.1951439258270614,"score_spread":0.1758881940142236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205746712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560958,0.0028956602,0.0005290548,0.0027653892,0.0004307011,0.00006075796,0.00002633103,0.0000054875195,0.037190802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996112,0.0023729377,0.0005718559,0.00034284955,0.000097257216,3.330543e-7,5.1745656e-7,0.000007984068,0.0004942957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993446,0.000046821202,0.00036437061,0.00007624508,0.000045590707,0.00012238562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989858,0.00007844373,0.00064742187,0.00018362701,0.00006537341,0.000039333707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010673741,0.00007837532,0.00019403108,0.00008185297,0.00015730072,0.000035470723,0.00016855201,0.000041226227,0.0006816546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016990452,0.000057395177,0.0000745696,0.00017233459,0.000040462222,0.00021399304,0.000016026546,0.00016342373,0.00041545363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024896723,0.00030515532,0.19741833,0.000025869835,0.0003339151,0.000010210317,0.0066874726,0.0003251081,0.00057827,0.6115131,0.17984872,0.0027048804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012262778,0.0003889622,0.2870574,0.00004523684,0.00008663987,0.000052933494,0.00053607,0.00045793943,0.001468338,0.3462311,0.36209184,0.00035728756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038099344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018617854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.265282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003334151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018485276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.746364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418154789","doi":"10.21314/jor.2014.293","title":"Conditional value-at-risk-based optimal partial hedging","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Risk","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Value at risk; Value (mathematics); Economics; Expected shortfall; Econometrics; Mathematics; Actuarial science; Risk management; Financial economics; Portfolio; Statistics; Finance","score_opus":0.014701670012309584,"score_gpt":0.21550360343664862,"score_spread":0.20080193342433905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418154789","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18721952,0.00059861713,0.8107527,0.00046717716,0.00017451061,0.00004746962,0.0001247461,0.000006905667,0.0006083894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99510497,0.00009691878,0.0040529594,0.00018547192,0.0005144183,0.0000041749922,0.00000412654,0.000011513925,0.00002542439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999159,0.00001856629,0.0005065573,0.000096521006,0.00005934498,0.0001600114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822474,0.00035581616,0.0011188705,0.0001694374,0.000064222295,0.00006691151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012898603,0.000085612846,0.00022437186,0.00008314089,0.00031904402,0.000024123106,0.00026716388,0.00004379506,0.00011587514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004683517,0.000068792186,0.00012019327,0.00012889372,0.00008319813,0.00007758159,0.00003120353,0.0002334427,0.00021959546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019690605,0.00012918057,0.015157484,0.000010511543,0.000073667565,0.0000012147318,0.00045624367,0.05854812,0.00003534932,0.92097914,0.0013980261,0.0030141377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018909163,0.00030789754,0.07996082,0.000025318903,0.00012265495,0.00005540909,0.000063274696,0.103337385,0.00043732562,0.7558106,0.05768212,0.00030626173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006313742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041173366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80788547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004648755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030292791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28225288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514227992","doi":"10.21314/jor.2009.191","title":"Min-Max robust and CVaR robust mean-variance portfolios","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Risk","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"CVAR; Variance (accounting); Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Portfolio; Expected shortfall; Financial economics","score_opus":0.04861479097870843,"score_gpt":0.31094742568092104,"score_spread":0.26233263470221263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514227992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77781993,0.005797257,0.20168196,0.004768379,0.0009871095,0.000210278,0.000018363216,0.000024454275,0.008692267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769969,0.012818707,0.0084507,0.0003269431,0.00039349846,2.0147063e-7,4.7207695e-7,0.000008995178,0.0010035732],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973538,0.00036057865,0.00086032995,0.00015388294,0.0010616959,0.00020973454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969186,0.0007603534,0.0012625724,0.0004150004,0.00048594526,0.00015753797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005524187,0.0001401791,0.00032568516,0.00023482076,0.00025721436,0.00018979293,0.00067216466,0.00007415337,0.00016953217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012859633,0.00007431079,0.00011321842,0.0006221029,0.00009211189,0.0005399778,0.000039215698,0.00033029917,0.000041631738],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053942826,0.00017631652,0.012906476,0.0000013025002,0.00006713737,0.000103321465,0.006009762,0.5586717,0.0001727833,0.0014020918,0.08821087,0.33173877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005338293,0.0024699722,0.44545552,0.00022950677,0.0010716204,0.004159666,0.008379433,0.10552433,0.0012326593,0.27250797,0.15231368,0.0013173567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028893404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020204108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4531474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018532088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077929246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3030306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531668889","doi":"10.21314/jor.2016.340","title":"A fuzzy data envelopment analysis model for evaluating the efficiency of socially responsible and conventional mutual funds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Risk","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Equity (law); Credibility; Transparency (behavior); Business; Fuzzy logic; Mutual fund; Accounting; Mutual information; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Finance; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.44461776048610036,"score_gpt":0.51871623586,"score_spread":0.07409847537389969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531668889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5887796,0.00032196738,0.40895078,0.0014848567,0.00012437806,0.00012019663,0.00016092959,0.0000020747277,0.00005518374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96346897,0.00013788897,0.035749987,0.000052176496,0.0000791686,0.000001536675,8.761426e-7,0.0000070172036,0.000502374],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479246,0.0011132528,0.0013621529,0.00023320201,0.002305066,0.00019385133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784635,0.01762607,0.0019259572,0.0008337338,0.0010796963,0.00007105337],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.048880473,0.00011182364,0.0003969332,0.0004144565,0.00039738696,0.000119948076,0.0019955938,0.00004408345,0.000103885846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019857565,0.000042692478,0.00021918102,0.0006872691,0.00025918454,0.00033290673,0.00053423917,0.0001297413,0.0000065695194],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008088612,0.0003384863,0.018942345,0.000009513753,0.0015824568,0.000004548538,0.01960569,0.032994036,0.045530535,0.00865623,0.012246302,0.85200125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019848866,0.00025593222,0.021862805,0.000059322298,0.0009815729,0.000028314853,0.0019261743,0.7701791,0.00032869197,0.20172079,0.000538325,0.00013406012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005914269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052122876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8518672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036136706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075329863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}