{"meta":{"query_hash":"152ac7c7cab1","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/152ac7c7cab1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Value+Inquiry"},"results":[{"id":"W1583490052","doi":"10.1007/s10790-009-9187-3","title":"Ben Bradley, Well-Being and Death","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.05705260367833753,"score_gpt":0.2782796864191689,"score_spread":0.22122708274083136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583490052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032362742,0.42867786,0.00053707586,0.5290866,0.006024506,0.000008615331,0.00009639797,0.000010823642,0.032321807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23374867,0.41315484,0.0017521031,0.26711023,0.015585987,0.000105156105,0.00011299154,0.000082615945,0.06834749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985607,0.00083631574,0.000081062484,0.0001509174,0.0002618032,0.00010921358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961444,0.002814027,0.00015909383,0.00011567085,0.0004755199,0.00029127943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031477099,0.00042413274,0.00058145117,0.00088364474,0.0051959595,0.00446609,0.00096423976,0.009365026,0.006875636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077043837,0.00033150738,0.00019286732,0.001183857,0.009901732,0.0067644087,0.0017525745,0.007823636,0.0012089958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076547774,0.000044080352,0.0012609377,0.0003322215,0.000018345974,0.00020593274,0.0097352415,0.00011985562,0.000117876414,0.51030254,0.44485146,0.03293498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004692402,0.000020483229,0.0027248936,0.0014470103,0.000017655877,0.00027117383,0.017639956,0.00010291647,0.00019034845,0.18872213,0.78877884,0.00003764608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023456404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05998566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023456404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029356189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027195197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04663974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981394114","doi":"10.1023/b:inqu.0000013345.47521.35","title":"G.E. Moore and the Principle of Organic Unity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029722928603198827,"score_gpt":0.2875863898044967,"score_spread":0.2578634612012979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981394114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011046889,0.07178271,0.021263039,0.29608244,0.002699884,0.000041515104,0.00014144572,0.00010536666,0.5968367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.750193,0.042486247,0.02232513,0.045770723,0.0042045084,0.00018138115,0.000097799835,0.00019749632,0.13454364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863154,0.0006414625,0.000056044428,0.00022077984,0.00032089782,0.00012916866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739385,0.0017557711,0.00013730142,0.0002913309,0.00029697665,0.00012467551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002797832,0.00046791867,0.0005759263,0.001325896,0.003253948,0.005352476,0.0007889373,0.004277772,0.005858722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068620457,0.000344374,0.00040007467,0.0012695041,0.032438725,0.011149254,0.002915832,0.005136269,0.0015141965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006985811,0.0000022431077,0.000029064386,0.000010917392,0.0000012400868,0.000015846326,0.00022766486,0.00005082676,0.00001466011,0.9925988,0.00502936,0.0020124125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049388423,0.0000033338806,0.000045153993,0.00003126801,0.000001048481,0.000025749201,0.00012585672,0.000047768135,0.000037495858,0.95739096,0.04228253,0.00000387808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036373085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00481413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005858722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037581262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024313696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027267277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986345554","doi":"10.1007/s10790-006-9007-y","title":"The Value of Humor","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Philosophy and Literary Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05250696781918556,"score_gpt":0.2805985948527731,"score_spread":0.22809162703358754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986345554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023313684,0.014359593,0.014550075,0.047427513,0.0011603325,0.000025758718,0.000057713223,0.00006317779,0.89904207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94211435,0.003193129,0.0031580115,0.0042807995,0.0011213556,0.000049903872,0.000023467364,0.00009412529,0.04596484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923959,0.0053591286,0.00013285015,0.000432919,0.0012597563,0.00041938465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98483557,0.010158155,0.00066056923,0.0021405586,0.0015783624,0.0006267189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005403119,0.00043849117,0.0005168991,0.002112609,0.0062086405,0.012127274,0.0010599238,0.0035231723,0.0073202867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015572657,0.00031105292,0.0003012125,0.0014674076,0.05282138,0.013796624,0.00408307,0.0042750817,0.001297187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013235581,0.0000064244205,0.00016798389,0.000025829946,0.000005263239,0.00003834319,0.0040972894,0.00005900108,0.00004888423,0.98374593,0.0038035407,0.007988291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072957546,0.0000100141415,0.00020998811,0.0001014803,0.000006106024,0.000090721354,0.0023994823,0.00013643054,0.00020306448,0.92000747,0.07682002,0.000007940399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012971924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019411304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012127274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032851216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031157162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028574765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990681668","doi":"10.1007/s10790-010-9249-6","title":"Privacy and Intimacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology; Computer security; Business","score_opus":0.04383316260907994,"score_gpt":0.3471450068948069,"score_spread":0.30331184428572694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990681668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15649255,0.0050287233,0.012737592,0.03147998,0.0003921705,0.00004920236,0.00006622657,0.000033503406,0.79371995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98455554,0.0007267723,0.0008648588,0.00068295,0.000085064974,0.000019133458,0.000012872723,0.000012684359,0.01304023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949792,0.003129409,0.00016257625,0.00044936503,0.0008089493,0.000470496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851268,0.009714106,0.0012748722,0.001877155,0.00088649767,0.0011205147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00508553,0.00027894034,0.00036740844,0.001463852,0.0073473495,0.012073329,0.000722607,0.0032529042,0.011942888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02098754,0.00036308783,0.00029369383,0.0011661252,0.026653893,0.010779334,0.0058012423,0.0043715104,0.00093022874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035197092,0.000058672365,0.0024423448,0.000032097538,0.000008545286,0.00016046994,0.03055098,0.00006609557,0.00011997309,0.94873697,0.0013381713,0.01645049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024051664,0.000051680352,0.0026066587,0.00016907514,0.00002530738,0.0009099013,0.03233251,0.0002562151,0.0004863827,0.90020734,0.06290961,0.000021200998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011172056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001231793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012073329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018820703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024470668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039952934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000368625","doi":"10.1007/s10790-009-9150-3","title":"Hume, Callicott, and the Land Ethic: Prospects and Problems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06581954679639651,"score_gpt":0.27803657870002724,"score_spread":0.21221703190363073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000368625","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046154995,0.04436395,0.009858124,0.50773937,0.0007482679,0.000047021706,0.00015084732,0.00003906133,0.39089838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9248068,0.015900284,0.006398612,0.022560198,0.0013305377,0.00010642814,0.00005507089,0.00006670776,0.028775461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996335,0.0020032704,0.000088392015,0.00043743974,0.0007254344,0.00041046698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831012,0.013100454,0.00061437074,0.0009878767,0.0014502855,0.00074578234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01079634,0.00039946949,0.0017288612,0.002725335,0.007776326,0.012027397,0.0020591463,0.011506984,0.01770976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020991849,0.00032747377,0.0004319464,0.0045301304,0.04778421,0.022968438,0.004273507,0.0050221295,0.001063595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017322209,0.000016827637,0.0001526862,0.000023900682,0.0000033448505,0.00001898134,0.00057042536,0.00009929665,0.000008820292,0.98866546,0.005033984,0.005388902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007902303,0.0000032170567,0.00015795174,0.000053272393,0.0000015564414,0.00001681239,0.0012422575,0.00013272231,0.000022612196,0.9853357,0.013019101,0.000006948385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015377408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025751263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01770976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071558272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076828506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05924505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006095061","doi":"10.1007/s10790-013-9386-9","title":"Practical Reasonableness: Some Metaethical Issues","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Expressivism; Moral realism; Epistemology; Normative; Deliberation; Sociology; Realism; Politics; Moral psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.28625607149132304,"score_gpt":0.39749176451467294,"score_spread":0.1112356930233499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006095061","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008157942,0.017308224,0.123162925,0.6375667,0.0019672585,0.00013358316,0.00014410571,0.00017009022,0.21138917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80168676,0.0088308025,0.07401857,0.0818759,0.009419199,0.0011289943,0.00020076225,0.00035368765,0.022485282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793363,0.013938301,0.00088621024,0.0016664909,0.0032846117,0.00088803173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95209086,0.037810393,0.0012508021,0.0042530294,0.0033982205,0.0011967277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04239682,0.0007643467,0.0016119543,0.0036801207,0.0058919233,0.008955006,0.005896662,0.012390621,0.008446313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05302797,0.0008370426,0.0017658562,0.0024342882,0.04188152,0.02093032,0.005895703,0.017649919,0.0011291218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002921434,0.000008087258,0.00002316231,0.000016400856,0.0000031140708,0.000019945825,0.00033248877,0.00008592147,0.000009885432,0.99713457,0.0012389647,0.0011245136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057696316,0.0000025591091,0.00002523323,0.000036113543,0.0000015102761,0.000023137944,0.00013050073,0.00025053046,0.000015895528,0.99217564,0.007330034,0.0000029583564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002774725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022044447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04239682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008198523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043726503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22421855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007467555","doi":"10.1007/s10790-009-9182-8","title":"The Responsibility of Intoxicated Offenders","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Criminology; Criminal justice; Psychology; Law; Criminal responsibility; Criminal law; Political science","score_opus":0.066401239936664,"score_gpt":0.38039139592176485,"score_spread":0.3139901559851008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007467555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228757,0.00026397503,0.00086690014,0.013835089,0.00008166717,0.00002796463,0.000029928082,0.000006107812,0.062012658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977118,0.00007568476,0.00006203913,0.00016192805,0.000012218757,0.000002878114,0.0000030042636,0.0000016390353,0.001968797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977968,0.001291858,0.000068012676,0.00010533205,0.00026383778,0.00047424182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879738,0.0047810767,0.0023219388,0.00066953286,0.0019813667,0.0022722918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023290196,0.00022010064,0.0002344593,0.00079392357,0.0044759377,0.0034205364,0.0008117932,0.0019513329,0.0051979735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022383688,0.00019584996,0.00016527082,0.00031367358,0.0062630847,0.0028256397,0.0033790797,0.0024097678,0.00021100555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004129187,0.0010199214,0.3275662,0.00013468131,0.00006073828,0.008059256,0.1926672,0.0017129375,0.0012276095,0.39034364,0.01033546,0.06645941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097344,0.00040668258,0.1876095,0.00037263706,0.000091288595,0.0058821025,0.3741415,0.0043756617,0.0018080118,0.38674018,0.03837077,0.00010427692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010752033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01265341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010752033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017445724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004235576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021378875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069346737","doi":"10.1023/b:inqu.0000013347.46834.cc","title":"Why Moore's Open Question is Open: The Evolution of Moral Supervenience","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supervenience; Epistemology; Philosophy; Closed-ended question; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.13359261328797453,"score_gpt":0.33330224268726594,"score_spread":0.1997096293992914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069346737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3138098,0.003615252,0.04531042,0.14074202,0.0007391735,0.00004485685,0.00014067927,0.00017257915,0.4954252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900395,0.00027065794,0.0030527557,0.0010731735,0.00010026022,0.000011861401,0.0000157082,0.00006930835,0.0053667226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605536,0.0021833705,0.000096363816,0.00064103154,0.00063845573,0.00038540526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844434,0.008569733,0.0010010231,0.0024000513,0.002706752,0.0008789929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073268353,0.00013903566,0.0003684182,0.0008484699,0.0033868465,0.0055712005,0.0011520776,0.0033980815,0.009081316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034767047,0.00032057596,0.00028722928,0.0007471559,0.02582017,0.010805822,0.0029453589,0.0052097165,0.0007412205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022582037,0.000013608512,0.0007694495,0.0000117184345,0.0000044486815,0.00004053359,0.00540469,0.00012467388,0.00013142668,0.98277974,0.0014703798,0.009226731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011984894,0.000011929269,0.0011978341,0.000033780598,0.0000035294142,0.000078770434,0.0016641385,0.0003951443,0.00025782178,0.97602296,0.020308029,0.000014022293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003344091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003066799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009081316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029782874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024841735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038748503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121529739","doi":"10.1007/s10790-007-9079-3","title":"Ignorance, Indeterminacy, and Abortion Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Abortion; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.03451319969496723,"score_gpt":0.37741613396376855,"score_spread":0.3429029342688013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121529739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3697464,0.015388246,0.010609389,0.2957616,0.00038200448,0.000052999287,0.00014349725,0.000021680118,0.3078942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922708,0.00095890125,0.0002993296,0.0044480856,0.00018979918,0.000016481948,0.000008315964,0.0000036908482,0.0018044993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937702,0.003928696,0.00019829744,0.00042287962,0.00073903595,0.0009409682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9369163,0.055850834,0.0035045708,0.0014414429,0.0012703784,0.0010164558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015312745,0.00023393432,0.000695313,0.0011718163,0.004072247,0.008092769,0.0008927431,0.00760854,0.0030780463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046013217,0.00040794298,0.00044347814,0.0011300246,0.03179686,0.0057997876,0.0027833923,0.008783708,0.00014611105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056374567,0.000030880405,0.0016422983,0.00002296827,0.000009502409,0.00006402182,0.0015186458,0.00049615675,0.000049642273,0.9916898,0.0010723155,0.0033473547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021513948,0.000020635276,0.0010365532,0.000062238956,0.000016182115,0.000044757573,0.0010932967,0.000566395,0.000090424604,0.99223596,0.0048013753,0.000010788161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008434286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009358931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015312745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006135856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006253568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08098251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158119241","doi":"10.1007/s10790-014-9456-7","title":"Evil and Its Opposite","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06853371674919403,"score_gpt":0.2617183279763811,"score_spread":0.19318461122718708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158119241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030736212,0.006962742,0.003644615,0.10452544,0.0035928034,0.000017714037,0.000055932378,0.00005353172,0.850411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388931,0.0013099947,0.0004475123,0.015436974,0.0012899386,0.000027420603,0.000024946989,0.00008356883,0.0424865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955258,0.0023830466,0.00011008645,0.00039401033,0.0008436062,0.00074350106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940952,0.0027405145,0.00046728217,0.000996689,0.00076327677,0.0009370235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043879533,0.00046964845,0.000648098,0.0016157188,0.007622476,0.01417893,0.0008526353,0.005405626,0.011414674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01168619,0.0002306738,0.0003401058,0.0009874146,0.06500128,0.012908,0.006747683,0.008554622,0.0012997115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146485945,0.000009847731,0.00014295014,0.000014180503,0.000003825628,0.00003179966,0.0029794194,0.000019220064,0.000019975452,0.9897177,0.0044756057,0.0025706745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017021075,0.000018999883,0.00033187334,0.00016564148,0.000009216694,0.0002027611,0.010875519,0.00008093997,0.00011442529,0.8729385,0.11522979,0.000015382642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014052364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018938836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01417893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023127152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024438365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038185894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467019590","doi":"10.1023/a:1010396022487","title":"Bernard Shaw, The Doctor's Dilemma: Scarcity, Socialism, and the Sanctity of Life","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Literature Analysis and Criticism","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03255007408811052,"score_gpt":0.3059684263312047,"score_spread":0.2734183522430942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467019590","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035469849,0.12521459,0.0008855411,0.85152787,0.003316861,0.0000162974,0.0000614351,0.000010112677,0.015420293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.339489,0.13685286,0.0028579743,0.47610682,0.015658386,0.00015233511,0.00006657802,0.000110170484,0.02870584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926173,0.004661621,0.00030207285,0.0005840882,0.0015371778,0.00029769924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97184306,0.023984626,0.0008459512,0.0003513931,0.002254316,0.0007207464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011972763,0.00077699125,0.0010779441,0.0016821177,0.008513657,0.009847051,0.0020470659,0.028672377,0.0042455224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032627393,0.0005339666,0.00042251233,0.0027099357,0.031282987,0.0125505505,0.0028824362,0.015962986,0.00095725013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010097362,0.000038612674,0.0006441478,0.00031706155,0.00003673584,0.0002259754,0.015189427,0.0002597658,0.0001200989,0.6711148,0.30219713,0.009755242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111745205,0.000024231076,0.0014839916,0.0011845694,0.000024029627,0.00024254058,0.022872994,0.00020557836,0.0002311602,0.59663993,0.3769036,0.00007561499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025252217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04552644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028672377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054570613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005947124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06331879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893195982","doi":"10.1007/s10790-018-9662-9","title":"Exchanging for Reasons, Right and Wrong","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.07492998713815617,"score_gpt":0.38151077872521044,"score_spread":0.30658079158705426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893195982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10129211,0.0046768547,0.06931855,0.18777847,0.0036478934,0.00011349155,0.00024830227,0.00014215725,0.63278216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94961053,0.0012402801,0.012669172,0.0068117892,0.00042127474,0.00007951502,0.00007379495,0.0002365683,0.02885708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98065394,0.014000915,0.0006301767,0.0010955535,0.002464993,0.0011542904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97251564,0.018791975,0.0016959232,0.003963835,0.0022893937,0.000743235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015787562,0.0006110452,0.00082843355,0.0018385821,0.0064416444,0.015977418,0.0018196407,0.0074830563,0.013955225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043984752,0.00057557726,0.00059767533,0.0018553708,0.042201374,0.026820388,0.005280222,0.0072896224,0.0017051315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003314345,0.000024606643,0.0006459264,0.000059149643,0.000010832907,0.00012916587,0.03612971,0.000045155844,0.0001886663,0.95099014,0.0033887192,0.008354761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022368318,0.000018583678,0.00036126087,0.00032956558,0.000027184195,0.00035911263,0.07018687,0.00032299248,0.0008357267,0.83194363,0.095559455,0.000033358876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021625522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001859784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015977418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031725848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057113827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08349359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905452376","doi":"10.1007/s10790-018-9676-3","title":"Virtues for the Imperfect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12781243362665953,"score_gpt":0.33010624114839343,"score_spread":0.2022938075217339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905452376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040487535,0.00546241,0.039045166,0.13456513,0.0014182384,0.00006890693,0.0001886431,0.0001604296,0.77860355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95117486,0.00094717316,0.007699157,0.010840759,0.0010427644,0.00012362665,0.000058617883,0.00014690553,0.027966287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921119,0.004037787,0.0003025818,0.0012219936,0.0015452086,0.0007805319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819255,0.008706439,0.0010893309,0.004855962,0.0023211627,0.001101614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011527307,0.00043624124,0.0012717649,0.0015798189,0.0072137523,0.010554179,0.0012559897,0.0059973984,0.00943211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02837595,0.0004696442,0.0006307428,0.0010260117,0.052538432,0.014063072,0.004931359,0.008736505,0.0011869813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005849578,0.000004291155,0.000105836,0.000007959137,0.000003064546,0.0000112137495,0.00033600436,0.000056111385,0.000014736402,0.99673045,0.001728452,0.0009961923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051876914,0.00000276053,0.000071214774,0.000016055055,0.0000025411264,0.000013462868,0.0001916885,0.0001247385,0.000019919213,0.99091595,0.008632904,0.000003598134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040149433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004336677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011527307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003956356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045698234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060962975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948121884","doi":"10.1007/s10790-019-09693-6","title":"A Consideration of Carroll’s Content Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3439926779974978,"score_gpt":0.5152290044122311,"score_spread":0.1712363264147333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948121884","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007865617,0.005888286,0.5373893,0.16017166,0.0051875804,0.0013949048,0.00026521113,0.0004528858,0.2813845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44890928,0.0050367215,0.46484172,0.03819735,0.0042161397,0.008428947,0.00015476054,0.000749625,0.029465396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8868564,0.064609244,0.0049452577,0.005341829,0.036337245,0.001910042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65136206,0.30654693,0.0035574604,0.009914548,0.026738968,0.0018799717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090971604,0.0021566758,0.0027941482,0.01783572,0.013139468,0.020758333,0.01016626,0.010750959,0.015212084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23322196,0.002315665,0.0020377366,0.010623458,0.07610221,0.040233817,0.0077598905,0.011912591,0.0023164218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090926305,0.000010917735,0.000063753294,0.000069715585,0.0000074205377,0.0000384072,0.0040203333,0.00008234441,0.00003699274,0.98580176,0.0031812445,0.006678058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002370072,0.000010190851,0.000103106,0.00031974958,0.000011297318,0.00006677581,0.0018354076,0.00095335545,0.00017688083,0.97172695,0.024733786,0.00003882596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013769627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014052663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090971604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02012372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016950417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48110956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041843723","doi":"10.1007/s10790-020-09748-z","title":"Altruistic Eudaimonism and the Self-Absorption Objection","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Absorption (acoustics); Psychology; Social psychology; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.053354898022639465,"score_gpt":0.24635271775322568,"score_spread":0.19299781973058622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041843723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14320673,0.0018694372,0.010575424,0.062670745,0.0005758824,0.000028308643,0.000026740936,0.000037621285,0.78100914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98532087,0.00011787055,0.00075089146,0.0027090274,0.00010315146,0.000021608654,0.0000037330544,0.000014972302,0.010957926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606895,0.002411788,0.00008411884,0.0004294492,0.00051817636,0.00048750718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939959,0.0031630313,0.0007195436,0.00086845935,0.0006235834,0.0006294336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005138219,0.00025249636,0.00042606224,0.0006254924,0.0039926576,0.0036280248,0.0009670431,0.0045750714,0.005986229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011226581,0.00018688694,0.00030159813,0.00037138347,0.028283603,0.0036747605,0.0041654115,0.0051412475,0.0004827701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019948171,0.0000125872975,0.00029677778,0.000009099448,0.000004601676,0.000056148496,0.0017097148,0.000063621,0.00007499046,0.994269,0.0012536348,0.0022299383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032918237,0.000019667516,0.0007349768,0.00003644975,0.0000062049635,0.00019126062,0.0019268433,0.00039416802,0.00018571253,0.97236437,0.024094837,0.000012526018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081672793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011136719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005986229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018280343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013307971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027173817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233658302","doi":"10.1007/s10790-015-9519-4","title":"Symbolic Value","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); The Symbolic; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Statistics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.14265178649106033,"score_gpt":0.35099031947153303,"score_spread":0.2083385329804727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233658302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048920577,0.0015077783,0.008877159,0.009358197,0.0003649645,0.000022688917,0.000072915536,0.000055043627,0.97484916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7457612,0.0022713335,0.0048220498,0.0028593466,0.000833834,0.000120511286,0.0001824262,0.0001797028,0.2429696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976496,0.0009282763,0.000066798486,0.0002960378,0.0007794315,0.00027973714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972184,0.0010861581,0.00017072834,0.0006250447,0.0006034776,0.00029623738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016819958,0.0004978101,0.00047963814,0.0019903015,0.004184123,0.012802077,0.0010007246,0.0024922653,0.038106322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007681699,0.00024677857,0.0003362178,0.0028344172,0.021510651,0.010199442,0.004429282,0.0034469587,0.004805767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020813386,0.0000026350763,0.000033336783,0.0000071996906,9.032317e-7,0.0000075477515,0.0005343082,0.000021344902,0.0000138761525,0.9941229,0.0024156815,0.0028381743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000404473,0.000004092876,0.00009560636,0.000044476015,0.000002806326,0.000030126195,0.00086939166,0.00009413409,0.000066940716,0.92121756,0.07756722,0.000003661357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030559914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003453522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038106322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005908769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044641206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12747836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244423804","doi":"10.1023/a:1004797402943","title":"Introduction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.034705405886861364,"score_gpt":0.296816720590814,"score_spread":0.2621113147039526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244423804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017153806,0.0014227488,0.0051286463,0.014519119,0.0050422694,0.00017913496,0.0024814862,0.0006161581,0.96889496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019384474,0.0016327812,0.0038640304,0.008010206,0.0018224834,0.00024407914,0.0026435119,0.0003528351,0.96204567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858785,0.0002437061,0.000042526146,0.00029100757,0.0006396397,0.00019541444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716336,0.0005729728,0.00012327949,0.00036658839,0.0012329884,0.0005408433],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016870222,0.00051175547,0.00030560346,0.0012862453,0.0019528712,0.0060169357,0.0014822849,0.0020411294,0.4392154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065226005,0.00021292956,0.00044524536,0.0013181939,0.0011409905,0.0027344106,0.0026731421,0.0021023303,0.25052145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006316933,0.000066894616,0.00071620214,0.00019841781,0.0000033807803,0.00007720774,0.00077866734,0.00008985024,0.00036305242,0.16957937,0.6691671,0.15889673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037341977,0.000010649127,0.0003515706,0.00009394404,0.0000013394942,0.00003409382,0.0002636292,0.000027441723,0.00011244863,0.0095424,0.98955476,0.0000040206583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032314416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037877094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5607846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017992791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029995805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7998912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250393519","doi":"10.1007/s10790-007-9027-2","title":"Book Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06171616521367294,"score_gpt":0.36496775786176366,"score_spread":0.3032515926480907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250393519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039410355,0.02767659,0.0007937833,0.020394063,0.026294215,0.00013270188,0.0006013171,0.0004982031,0.92321503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007735754,0.004884095,0.00018106432,0.0023497948,0.0021771681,0.000022681645,0.00020291473,0.00007732612,0.98933136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924695,0.0000642699,0.000016268257,0.00006623453,0.00054217933,0.00006404004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755967,0.0003601239,0.00009081981,0.00021205601,0.0013114254,0.00046591274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069694535,0.00057019043,0.00078478333,0.0028554953,0.0015784363,0.004751013,0.0011007031,0.002137542,0.44451407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039963285,0.00031723888,0.00042094,0.0030853786,0.0007715057,0.0021332358,0.0013063897,0.0023747864,0.41664323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036211538,0.00000966531,0.000024254901,0.000038360708,7.995713e-7,0.000012972984,0.00000923973,0.000018001916,0.000035624627,0.0017167001,0.9592187,0.03891211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018855817,0.000003331153,0.000084613115,0.000055521818,9.904679e-7,0.000021721538,0.000018943387,0.00001689381,0.000019188341,0.0006615067,0.99911374,0.0000016967491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004467226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0144072715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44451407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018011762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030242573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79233325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254642159","doi":"10.1007/s10790-004-9266-4","title":"Republicanism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06786866947378874,"score_gpt":0.37737006432164244,"score_spread":0.3095013948478537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254642159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031701215,0.00014208975,0.0006015191,0.0036551277,0.00020514322,0.00003323891,0.00007092394,0.000031851978,0.9635589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61819696,0.00014062683,0.00050939166,0.0028268613,0.00011360928,0.00005844425,0.000099567405,0.000035916604,0.3780186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988794,0.00031317593,0.000028604834,0.00018739098,0.00021821272,0.00037322164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926966,0.00015809647,0.00006848388,0.00019249192,0.000155623,0.00015568905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010835392,0.0001982655,0.00028031465,0.0007461918,0.004633609,0.0024158244,0.00043172226,0.0010106888,0.03938189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023799955,0.00012685866,0.00023572125,0.0006359648,0.0025592805,0.0011066245,0.0020186382,0.0025754988,0.005802328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003261106,0.00004986426,0.0012617711,0.000024093359,0.0000058256906,0.00008939594,0.0031170025,0.00003864646,0.0004014568,0.94805425,0.024578977,0.022346104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004588873,0.00007256529,0.010250855,0.00007259014,0.000015469033,0.00033482155,0.0036840052,0.00041088188,0.0012683414,0.15343212,0.8303927,0.000019727728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002335038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077914884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03938189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017929939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015209703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13174558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360979119","doi":"10.1007/s10790-023-09938-5","title":"Wholesale moral error for naturalists","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.36380100692528144,"score_gpt":0.38621189726789584,"score_spread":0.022410890342614398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360979119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27980238,0.0018055747,0.1246127,0.121842146,0.0024831025,0.00006480689,0.00012974729,0.00031649062,0.46894306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98631024,0.00015631376,0.005200625,0.0018448932,0.00020328508,0.000017274617,0.000017572274,0.000051353978,0.0061984938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952814,0.002260312,0.00018278092,0.00059680577,0.0013461949,0.00033241662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97569954,0.014023926,0.0015629423,0.0044345167,0.003429029,0.00085013476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007825039,0.00022271748,0.00038551746,0.0006193379,0.0021504539,0.0040129684,0.0008648629,0.0035933706,0.009380756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0710674,0.00019810333,0.00027010214,0.0003399119,0.008215795,0.007402068,0.0026421011,0.0035170587,0.0007153609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013549601,0.0000655746,0.0026227038,0.000046616216,0.000023324106,0.00025489228,0.0020792666,0.00073292194,0.000593692,0.9605378,0.0074995966,0.025408084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108427075,0.000012002562,0.001223684,0.000024413386,0.000005308898,0.00017600736,0.0005612056,0.0016398362,0.00031837675,0.9897301,0.006288386,0.000009686083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093504356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010594063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009380756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012582078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015373484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041383207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366448656","doi":"10.1007/s10790-023-09940-x","title":"Benatar and Metz on Cosmic Meaning and Anti-natalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Pretoria","keywords":"Meaning (existential); COSMIC cancer database; Philosophy; Epistemology; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.05207531665635359,"score_gpt":0.3110844649012807,"score_spread":0.25900914824492716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366448656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026891442,0.021128353,0.016976498,0.14635345,0.0023356497,0.00002228941,0.00009870621,0.00007225248,0.7861213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9229516,0.0050355764,0.0038398134,0.018820107,0.0021867969,0.00009722545,0.000057833713,0.00015373628,0.04685726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663395,0.0020482105,0.000066807144,0.00034322892,0.0005888374,0.0003190764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766326,0.001484655,0.00016832682,0.00024062685,0.00031139012,0.00013184911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030923395,0.00045629047,0.0005698606,0.0010081284,0.004958089,0.005161031,0.0009047786,0.0038036143,0.0044321343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053626015,0.00022328518,0.0005434368,0.0009989624,0.027542248,0.0058649965,0.0033215596,0.0058205,0.0007699883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042577935,0.0000017079375,0.000029090024,0.0000065011395,0.0000010729351,0.000014446066,0.0004851883,0.000022129616,0.000014750911,0.996911,0.0019107849,0.0005991004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008333302,0.0000052965447,0.00009039018,0.000041153053,0.000002289644,0.000042555017,0.0003358915,0.000114734634,0.000057577483,0.94592613,0.053370204,0.0000055197866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039444286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032968004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056922697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056922697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015881162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041300535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399330663","doi":"10.1007/s10790-024-09987-4","title":"Moral Obligations in Conditions of Partial Compliance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; International political economy; Ontology; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; International law; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.30778742315542307,"score_gpt":0.4611777590674507,"score_spread":0.1533903359120276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399330663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35099757,0.00060807663,0.08622698,0.022969604,0.00034235607,0.00024736923,0.0003738528,0.00016811812,0.5380661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992759,0.00006915026,0.0035161616,0.00037001693,0.000080854865,0.00012247622,0.000037900067,0.000019175523,0.0030252668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854058,0.007030251,0.0011178973,0.0015084228,0.0025317061,0.0024059098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411851,0.040367074,0.0036864136,0.0069366735,0.005228222,0.0025964887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014075567,0.00031574682,0.0012028309,0.0015184734,0.0051444727,0.007385462,0.0012872828,0.0042217337,0.011165078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06045582,0.0006763445,0.0010428891,0.0014314464,0.020032778,0.012766024,0.007167758,0.0053634564,0.00073803886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001850222,0.000009063819,0.00024850905,0.000012161752,0.0000040403756,0.00007365408,0.00051942776,0.00022056149,0.00005583314,0.9975078,0.00029706975,0.0010334617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012708157,0.00000984359,0.00020324986,0.000017164746,0.0000036347587,0.000100799516,0.0005523634,0.00083824387,0.00007535214,0.9967964,0.0013838175,0.00000639144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001170714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010151424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014075567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00271278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00486304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074439585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403063648","doi":"10.1007/s10790-024-10010-z","title":"Relational Egalitarianism and Aesthetic Equality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Aesthetics; Gender equality; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Gender studies; Art; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.15181434517755987,"score_gpt":0.4021110738656957,"score_spread":0.25029672868813585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403063648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15488812,0.0006884774,0.031856693,0.007573946,0.00015432638,0.000036586505,0.00003203869,0.000047850273,0.80472183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99119735,0.00007382485,0.002246872,0.0002444714,0.000037379446,0.000012363047,0.000008952768,0.000024143723,0.006154771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995896,0.0017579218,0.00013056766,0.0006567223,0.0009624976,0.0005963345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961642,0.0014654062,0.00042057547,0.001138828,0.0005218476,0.00028916314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036039352,0.00026464957,0.00048318075,0.0010646188,0.0032197193,0.005722191,0.0011672965,0.001895238,0.014754384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009118922,0.0002745502,0.0005535956,0.00095286284,0.02334143,0.00610877,0.0044567664,0.003065755,0.00074656913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012535653,0.000011962322,0.00019235857,0.000008118278,0.000004282996,0.000017310125,0.0014248132,0.000091176604,0.00011251819,0.99487215,0.00020804396,0.0030446814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008940628,0.000008142475,0.0004867425,0.000009813957,0.0000049666887,0.00005359304,0.00092863134,0.00019896969,0.00013499991,0.9943739,0.0037870996,0.0000040945274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012589571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016741785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014754384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022905336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012985942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04935831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407592698","doi":"10.1007/s10790-025-10033-0","title":"Two Guises of the Good in Anscombe","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.046804618154786884,"score_gpt":0.3941098705881471,"score_spread":0.34730525243336025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407592698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011083292,0.0038388148,0.023639485,0.13197018,0.0015177748,0.000061874816,0.000061366314,0.000096080585,0.8277312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6453453,0.0019405865,0.01630546,0.027609732,0.0014027691,0.00030969124,0.000041899322,0.0003599494,0.30668464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907252,0.005337763,0.00021088775,0.0009676332,0.0016717131,0.0010867458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899871,0.0060130437,0.00027379234,0.0016353216,0.0011887158,0.00090194494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009376849,0.0005292403,0.0010052468,0.0021270118,0.012135605,0.016887547,0.0015436654,0.009221155,0.015474562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02081628,0.00057616044,0.00058398215,0.0019078836,0.062607676,0.020376043,0.007629008,0.013071707,0.0018829842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002779493,0.000002552042,0.000024397044,0.0000022795405,4.8986914e-7,0.000008366753,0.00068595464,0.0000132046425,0.000004631227,0.9952786,0.003068522,0.00090820424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000558545,0.0000041719027,0.00009366389,0.000030579704,0.0000016297023,0.000031417097,0.0012334909,0.00015396919,0.00004721242,0.9397724,0.058614455,0.0000115429975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02118751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03975512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02118751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078959055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006295833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057289064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W617900740","doi":"10.1007/s10790-015-9497-6","title":"The Nietzschean Virtue of Authenticity: “Wie man wird, was man ist.”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Literature; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0913271530974116,"score_gpt":0.29503861494301376,"score_spread":0.20371146184560215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W617900740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025638364,0.012017004,0.01844146,0.11364781,0.0012941791,0.000041636387,0.00005996423,0.000048198974,0.8288113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633895,0.0027425007,0.0032337124,0.0074147233,0.00042213383,0.00006297693,0.000026321652,0.00005318276,0.022655051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029994,0.00695417,0.00020913445,0.0005549428,0.001418499,0.000563277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99333763,0.0036733935,0.00057243364,0.00094139413,0.0009625815,0.00051253143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007388287,0.0003848895,0.00034828053,0.0011231985,0.0069107497,0.010929449,0.00090968155,0.0042307116,0.0044788984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01697692,0.0002726938,0.00027545055,0.0010302175,0.06933499,0.01448719,0.007200967,0.0055963164,0.0009606965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071454397,0.000004564885,0.00012765589,0.00001954784,0.0000019918405,0.000028808126,0.010568003,0.0000205015,0.000029640476,0.98349804,0.0029551852,0.0027388646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010062345,0.000013047087,0.0003591513,0.00021119336,0.0000043453206,0.00016322841,0.017872138,0.000090351394,0.00020661297,0.8362892,0.1447667,0.0000139684635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00335906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053641605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010929449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032185607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006431886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039073527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}