{"meta":{"query_hash":"4f883ab94f1a","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property"},"cohort_total":38,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"exported":38,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4f883ab94f1a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+World+Intellectual+Property"},"results":[{"id":"W1484082402","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2011.00423.x","title":"Are Geographical Indications a Wise Strategy for Developing Country Farmers? Greenfields, Clawbacks and Monopoly Rents","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Negotiation; Business; Product (mathematics); Monopoly; International trade; European union; Developing country; Reputation; Industrial organization; Economics; International economics; Market economy; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.07754997040701331,"score_gpt":0.28089823479224896,"score_spread":0.20334826438523565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484082402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828909,0.0008310504,0.0021990451,0.0035207453,0.00039477574,0.0007515229,0.0000075489147,0.00004182977,0.009362602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974091,0.00013322626,0.00011399401,0.001631599,0.0004400268,0.00000447748,0.0000018081342,0.000016675885,0.0002490574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988581,0.00004740955,0.000447612,0.00012829225,0.00021370556,0.0003048948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986804,0.00015753074,0.0005093658,0.00013634957,0.00048171324,0.000034630462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008077376,0.00017418739,0.0002595667,0.0002359903,0.0004303489,0.00015341285,0.0003745783,0.000075945565,0.00009656094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093488005,0.00009095166,0.00010616478,0.0005742269,0.00029555266,0.00056339917,0.00009353827,0.00036356458,0.000005766189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014330478,0.0036602474,0.43123913,0.0029825945,0.003504024,0.00008663878,0.072596714,0.000089508525,0.0004174606,0.0528788,0.2764056,0.14180881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006413262,0.0012725285,0.37443355,0.0014764809,0.0026173699,0.00016826791,0.23544706,0.002063216,0.00047652127,0.19795112,0.175118,0.0025626165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009682246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005835157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16285035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000521496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008878626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3708901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524352386","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2010.00408.x","title":"Piercing the Power of the Patch: How Trademark Law Could Diminish the Power of Gang Insignia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Law; Context (archaeology); Intellectual property; Business; Government (linguistics); Criminal law; Power (physics); Political science; History","score_opus":0.037676478425783935,"score_gpt":0.2664596229559275,"score_spread":0.2287831445301436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524352386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69682765,0.0010723872,0.0001872656,0.09247624,0.003819265,0.0016971563,0.000012459404,0.000040878407,0.2038667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854795,0.00015427559,0.0000434361,0.00262656,0.0004242266,0.000005414328,1.7447086e-7,0.000050861665,0.011215556],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99422055,0.00224014,0.0010370007,0.00021658934,0.001656969,0.0006287629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922855,0.004591443,0.0010139936,0.0009370003,0.0010365305,0.00013555294],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00765235,0.0003491311,0.0005871408,0.00011642059,0.0016718447,0.00018969618,0.0036363865,0.00018745326,0.0027252324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072957766,0.00010469474,0.0005291746,0.0012616703,0.0048824335,0.00039324453,0.0003891037,0.0027538443,0.000029396577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014470064,0.0004603514,0.00025476023,0.000038808084,0.00056428625,0.0000062785334,0.69878256,0.00006011959,0.049059186,0.010519721,0.23511206,0.0036948624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092917134,0.0012497457,0.00053421257,0.00058280065,0.00049278676,0.00019334043,0.100976504,0.0003944811,0.1067604,0.0038723655,0.78334635,0.00066786446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017155498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011308435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59780604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010164441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063901686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1723843820","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2010.00399.x","title":"All the Game's a Stage: Machinima and Copyright in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Context (archaeology); Creativity; Copyright infringement; Fair use; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Intellectual property; Public relations; History","score_opus":0.022420603600414372,"score_gpt":0.2625645162231494,"score_spread":0.24014391262273505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1723843820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75706273,0.0005413584,0.00000762963,0.025376549,0.00091034936,0.00023136134,0.000003031091,0.000005361228,0.21586165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460211,0.00032160114,0.000017498018,0.001477165,0.00020578827,9.585347e-7,1.0772402e-7,0.0000068504096,0.051948957],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884564,0.0002122577,0.00026419226,0.00006146927,0.00037427913,0.00024218675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987106,0.00083019235,0.00012624859,0.00011398174,0.0000908653,0.00012814385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015164592,0.00008363765,0.00014720434,0.000051961604,0.00009485389,0.00008782419,0.0004972273,0.000020340427,0.00095488917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011990342,0.000029281642,0.000033670014,0.00022880112,0.00038299133,0.00015242794,0.00006133299,0.0007257034,0.000006830688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087315124,0.00015336384,0.003911314,0.000021123546,0.00013739741,0.00008600417,0.22087131,0.00003899501,0.001372641,0.0022700706,0.30685213,0.4634125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015915831,0.00004482129,0.0007073188,0.000021027035,0.000011821362,0.000020581607,0.00582711,0.00013436942,0.00016720656,0.00016819852,0.99267435,0.000064064756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49265826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6858222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010727515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013211038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1807393463","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2003.tb00199.x","title":"Agricultural Biotechnology Innovations<i>versus</i>Intellectual Property Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ingenuity; Intellectual property; Creativity; Safeguard; Agriculture; Investment (military); Business; Agricultural biotechnology; Law and economics; International trade; Law; Political science; Economics; History","score_opus":0.09267288132290065,"score_gpt":0.22536010985203686,"score_spread":0.13268722852913623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1807393463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46834758,0.0013550457,0.0037239313,0.013160194,0.0074964683,0.0019267863,0.0000049517676,0.00042807165,0.50355697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96625906,0.000109028464,0.00023687506,0.0021079509,0.0011963825,0.000010380154,0.0000069931857,0.000056429657,0.030016886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966873,0.00023038221,0.001273428,0.00034619254,0.0007142137,0.0007485102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963994,0.00085670716,0.0007249532,0.00048707248,0.0014846263,0.000047220834],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018268687,0.0005493159,0.00061947084,0.0009856337,0.0009996138,0.00032198356,0.001344692,0.00020158014,0.006114217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006223586,0.00019414321,0.000290507,0.00340319,0.00053519674,0.0012846903,0.00027369015,0.0014858182,0.0024476016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044341953,0.00077491417,0.00006118091,0.000116304844,0.0006938588,0.000029398514,0.0034381265,0.00034800475,0.014581702,0.011267434,0.9548682,0.009386693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00156031,0.00043745365,0.000027844759,0.00016428475,0.00022164872,0.00027548755,0.001338458,0.000676889,0.025443614,0.0014776505,0.9677939,0.0005824663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003796318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035509572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49791148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015766911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014664249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881618989","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12033","title":"Mash‐Up Songs: Are There Any Exceptions to the Exclusive Rights in the Light of the Jordanian Copyright Protection and Related Rights Law?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Copyright Act; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Exclusive right; Bill of rights; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.047678252810125506,"score_gpt":0.27408450950273006,"score_spread":0.22640625669260456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881618989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5383322,0.001300442,0.00022234433,0.15351164,0.0024571551,0.0049322834,0.000009123735,0.000060040915,0.29917476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97361535,0.000046026224,0.000024370333,0.00079731003,0.00043509735,0.00002633449,2.4890724e-7,0.000021461896,0.025033806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935007,0.0037842842,0.00086354616,0.00023347183,0.0011220269,0.00049595843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971761,0.00077598804,0.00059817557,0.0005640888,0.00071603036,0.00016960014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004878349,0.00029587172,0.00040794813,0.00019483946,0.0021752615,0.00019419342,0.001940853,0.00013945364,0.0007669377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015305635,0.00008518017,0.0001932045,0.0017699371,0.0013042534,0.00040571738,0.00025098148,0.0014441028,0.000111795205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016671342,0.00037532556,0.00006246822,0.00002429302,0.00025482842,0.000022818831,0.8218995,0.00024748454,0.0016506155,0.018454581,0.15423658,0.0011043613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081478147,0.00078878866,0.00020731373,0.0006106566,0.00016577421,0.00025343813,0.04733573,0.00042681632,0.0067944396,0.023180312,0.9190767,0.0003452481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00558973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053371117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7745638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026615954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002924797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983544029","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00322.x","title":"Birth, Retreat and Renaissance: The Lifecycle of Balance under the Canadian Copyright Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Doctrine; Legislature; Law; Supreme court; The Renaissance; Political science; Copyright Act; Common law copyright; Law and economics; Copyright law; Sociology; History; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.026230474277875396,"score_gpt":0.2242796401825337,"score_spread":0.19804916590465832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983544029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16878007,0.0075469236,0.00073466584,0.03776561,0.0014424827,0.00097310566,0.00000394868,0.000051573985,0.7827016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983021,0.00020618946,0.000016512811,0.007068674,0.0010708846,0.000001545385,7.3021505e-7,0.000032117212,0.008582331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981154,0.000092805814,0.0006882153,0.00015812904,0.00048774725,0.0004576971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758005,0.00089810474,0.0004305127,0.00042420812,0.0006125625,0.00005453396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031143364,0.00025357035,0.00033402047,0.00025354445,0.0011153548,0.00027672682,0.0010019554,0.00006408549,0.0028837717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060006505,0.000077674114,0.0001367219,0.0009753649,0.0010654608,0.00058935635,0.00018536914,0.00077900925,0.00011298418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015039379,0.00009568426,0.000577375,0.00008440655,0.00025323464,0.000014463614,0.003060133,0.00004613821,0.0018004677,0.0077232677,0.97376454,0.011076354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047800408,0.00013000201,0.0010161469,0.0002047353,0.00015064231,0.00010716311,0.0013346066,0.004126779,0.004722727,0.00370816,0.9837676,0.00025342492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051478975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26249686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81424093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097761746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013540227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992015040","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00333.x","title":"Local Knowledge as Trapped Knowledge: Intellectual Property, Culture, Power and Politics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Traditional knowledge; Politics; Custodians; Cosmopolitanism; Bioprospecting; Political science; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Public domain; Power (physics); Sociology; Indigenous; Law; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.0926895831514836,"score_gpt":0.2512071149439951,"score_spread":0.15851753179251152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992015040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3730996,0.01151225,0.0035873977,0.0029242444,0.0026322848,0.0014732758,0.0000048263046,0.00024236838,0.6045238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88546103,0.00084582786,0.00005208648,0.0022314128,0.0015115452,0.0000071380286,0.0000039573943,0.00009710141,0.10978987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966361,0.00026319976,0.0012243004,0.00040003948,0.00061095087,0.00086540385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669355,0.00077165145,0.00045664498,0.0004257543,0.001522134,0.00013024708],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013945698,0.0006686206,0.0008006402,0.00079518923,0.001219209,0.0002582258,0.0012026584,0.00019182656,0.0037529508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030730907,0.00027184095,0.0003351228,0.0015240249,0.0013242754,0.0011059653,0.0006314362,0.0015513181,0.0033008193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029121162,0.0012403477,0.000119428274,0.00025738424,0.0004922542,0.000075113785,0.04696305,0.00005988512,0.0016308845,0.0009346398,0.9272567,0.018058186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014478917,0.0008704375,0.000058349273,0.0004296655,0.00025465747,0.0017111115,0.0030848284,0.0047306763,0.004350167,0.0008473722,0.98147094,0.00074389065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038914225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016037807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51236147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015286992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003694478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016916328","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2005.tb00250.x","title":"Meeting T<scp>rips</scp> Commitments in Ukraine","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; International trade; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.08279891035866799,"score_gpt":0.2235754768740544,"score_spread":0.14077656651538642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016916328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8066196,0.0057044984,0.00012838746,0.0034363482,0.00045132273,0.00019708787,0.000010748536,0.00001334418,0.1834387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98793864,0.0013536258,0.0005112308,0.0012955475,0.00036170695,0.0000019798706,9.839905e-7,0.000023295403,0.008513011],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981983,0.000051186158,0.0011859388,0.00014690596,0.00005309854,0.0003645928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864215,0.00042783687,0.0005661258,0.0002244813,0.000045607965,0.000093812385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019515948,0.00017198441,0.00045792435,0.00035515532,0.00010602942,0.00006387756,0.00060884986,0.000051293242,0.0004361377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097307406,0.000106189975,0.0001438795,0.00038359142,0.00007981396,0.00032893213,0.000097797354,0.00051464915,0.00089447224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054158946,0.0024813584,0.051915523,0.00010491815,0.0010274037,0.000047429116,0.048469007,0.02066911,0.00092844985,0.012227484,0.8255636,0.036024142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010111297,0.00022125534,0.0019958597,0.00008487103,0.0000141876035,0.00007949834,0.0007079252,0.005156031,0.0011106529,0.002610184,0.98688823,0.000120173194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017274987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041854134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18131906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025322373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028355855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030890063","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00379.x","title":"(Re)implementing the Agreement on Trade‐Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights to Foster Innovation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; Outsourcing; Developing country; TRIPS Agreement; Business; Politics; Foreign direct investment; Investment (military); International trade; Industrial organization; International economics; Economics; Economic growth; Marketing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.102975182992661,"score_gpt":0.25342146708154173,"score_spread":0.15044628408888072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030890063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44034073,0.0003938609,0.0016227001,0.07775994,0.001987664,0.003415554,0.0000051049788,0.00012758565,0.47434688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97785676,0.00002062429,0.00004731076,0.014744555,0.00106093,0.0000068956324,0.0000061423566,0.00003969466,0.006217121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957931,0.00024177942,0.001857582,0.00031882065,0.0010890691,0.00069966115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677813,0.0007331471,0.0010240927,0.0005203957,0.00090326625,0.00004093938],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033848607,0.00049304793,0.00059746613,0.0011143137,0.00079022284,0.0002462303,0.0013823197,0.00009339316,0.004270853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002063666,0.00017188206,0.0002531885,0.0033399367,0.00018777933,0.00070516457,0.0002853953,0.0010615459,0.00067676074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068635438,0.001283641,0.00006702699,0.00013424217,0.0006726777,0.00002332108,0.02860235,0.0010408974,0.012386938,0.0040513324,0.80095446,0.14391954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023622806,0.0033586477,0.00043964127,0.0014009363,0.00048331905,0.000088057,0.0040500783,0.0069649853,0.050237518,0.009116364,0.9204914,0.0010067894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019512606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022962248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.537516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013900411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000971096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036943900","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00376.x","title":"The Precautionary Principle in Patent Law: A View from Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Patent law; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental law; Political science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.057878089722347884,"score_gpt":0.20852316624438047,"score_spread":0.15064507652203257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036943900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44539887,0.15344666,0.00043443777,0.11439619,0.0023037058,0.0007576538,0.00009293263,0.000021375972,0.2831482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930278,0.0016446053,0.000022543334,0.0016815158,0.00013258216,0.0000022240083,6.9407184e-7,0.0000035304859,0.0034844738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990224,0.000046614357,0.0005976832,0.000085184576,0.000079051264,0.00016905896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925244,0.00029829692,0.00022643822,0.00012306553,0.0000617739,0.000038010243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006190377,0.00009426536,0.00022180259,0.000040699444,0.00029183587,0.00003507019,0.00035262908,0.0000151777695,0.00023153832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024903263,0.000039670576,0.00006250949,0.00019923857,0.00011240299,0.00010418746,0.000052996005,0.00029752112,0.000046390523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023859458,0.00082843157,0.0121807195,0.000025608735,0.00089939975,0.00009531158,0.008839635,0.0027460176,0.00013930874,0.6509094,0.2632848,0.057665423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025946414,0.00010167562,0.011289382,0.00005690992,0.000007618172,0.000019304178,0.00010327624,0.0003477059,0.00009532864,0.027688213,0.95992255,0.0001085874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15240309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31195596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69663775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025519237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016968804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85324115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039636065","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2002.tb00156.x","title":"Network Copyright Rules in the People's Republic of China","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Chiang mai; China; Citation; Library science; Media studies; History; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Ethnology","score_opus":0.036823910269050096,"score_gpt":0.21113989402732578,"score_spread":0.17431598375827567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039636065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3600779,0.00611577,0.00042546753,0.027005635,0.0014523533,0.0009940746,0.0000016374927,0.00006288638,0.6038643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880379,0.0003159936,0.000043157208,0.0025898176,0.0017813601,0.0000044421486,0.0000014361041,0.00003247373,0.007193434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974183,0.00021668682,0.0010791982,0.00017389041,0.00065016386,0.00046174825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976572,0.0007400252,0.0006778701,0.00047387602,0.00043087133,0.000020175843],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027933822,0.0002899364,0.00052205916,0.00047037093,0.0003289075,0.00025822758,0.0016237368,0.00005934438,0.020431139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016343098,0.00010052147,0.0002308701,0.0020932837,0.0002565947,0.0010783189,0.00023717023,0.0008931748,0.0004062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046446337,0.00027234922,0.0003652814,0.00005581487,0.000060257607,0.000007809432,0.00601767,0.000115135816,0.00012082296,0.0004942842,0.98221433,0.009811764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001184911,0.0003967186,0.003923191,0.0005042245,0.0002379047,0.00019505827,0.0015686444,0.07593627,0.00032447526,0.006902935,0.90829265,0.0005330215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059267983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080135744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047251826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033537035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98046434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097969674","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2010.00413.x","title":"An Elementary Consideration of Humanity? Linking Trade‐Related Intellectual Property Rights to the Human Right to Health in International Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Human rights; Right to health; International trade law; TRIPS Agreement; Law; Political science; International law; Charter; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07436655643073833,"score_gpt":0.3177118883358404,"score_spread":0.24334533190510207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097969674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7905466,0.00021851443,0.0012162973,0.04089689,0.0018704043,0.0030355654,0.000010889292,0.000073306284,0.16213156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921102,0.00003731734,0.00062089093,0.0032672908,0.00029082655,0.0000075476596,0.0000041858852,0.000017529414,0.0036441924],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962001,0.0012276863,0.0012599946,0.00020972376,0.0007042911,0.00039821898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984895,0.00035283057,0.0003866401,0.00024387307,0.0003048504,0.00022231751],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044490653,0.00020762174,0.00037340831,0.00042497626,0.001321481,0.00011133979,0.0011294626,0.000055225886,0.004978782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022973509,0.00007745574,0.00009292987,0.00055518886,0.00038974005,0.00039910575,0.00011011806,0.00062660174,0.000053250336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048987736,0.0006270919,0.00008939023,0.000009941153,0.00016813149,0.000011088651,0.930436,0.00010313486,0.000962126,0.02384706,0.0371214,0.006134762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015327361,0.0037742192,0.0010642714,0.0010256484,0.00008139447,0.0000758029,0.028726371,0.00036577738,0.020117687,0.034875758,0.90757275,0.0007875965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008716632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14489643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9017096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043394376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042457908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102319304","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2004.tb00219.x","title":"Integrating China's Biotechnology Industry into Global Knowledge Creation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Biotechnology and Related Fields","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"China; Business; Biotechnology; Knowledge creation; Political science; Marketing; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.014733146747835147,"score_gpt":0.2839088377617626,"score_spread":0.26917569101392747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102319304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7126564,0.005201097,0.01188448,0.22457294,0.00082929846,0.00041927627,9.5281644e-7,0.00017044155,0.044265147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99426484,0.00067112304,0.0012628245,0.0005863557,0.00020062791,0.0000012492732,8.5014335e-7,0.0000131992065,0.002998951],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989096,0.00009128939,0.00050608424,0.000118550975,0.00015114449,0.00022331745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917364,0.000087810135,0.00022409584,0.00024806755,0.00018691654,0.00007945339],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000590333,0.00017489401,0.00033291464,0.00026541212,0.00020505734,0.000012569309,0.00034117096,0.0019062124,0.00029153487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012615788,0.0000719123,0.00011961203,0.0010097035,0.00053054444,0.0000816581,0.00010976986,0.0072113066,0.00008236001],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007930616,0.0029483482,0.001969194,0.0002564774,0.0025755707,0.00036518503,0.035320252,0.000537868,0.11429597,0.030502304,0.08102741,0.7222708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008699336,0.009053184,0.0040379083,0.0045657745,0.0015529206,0.023068346,0.009337264,0.001290426,0.6425819,0.022840453,0.27206215,0.0009103748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001259778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000120055214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72136045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029129456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033880447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104445471","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2004.tb00213.x","title":"Bioprospecting, Genetic Patenting and Indigenous Populations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bioprospecting; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Library science; Commons; Intellectual property; Sociology; Political science; Management; Law; History; Computer science; Economics; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.13282899314402807,"score_gpt":0.2343169597961724,"score_spread":0.10148796665214432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104445471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98777235,0.0009368523,0.00158707,0.0010765396,0.0006149752,0.0003134415,4.8550464e-7,0.000042136016,0.007656127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946398,0.00008745373,0.00040722627,0.0012470717,0.0009832924,0.00000199234,0.0000011337822,0.000034189834,0.0025978398],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857527,0.00002622569,0.0006028905,0.00014141542,0.00032008975,0.0003340847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989168,0.00008627875,0.00042360392,0.00016949177,0.0003785311,0.000025309833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074739964,0.00020889576,0.0002506375,0.0004009242,0.00068931596,0.00025547773,0.0004069976,0.000044466175,0.0004845026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006749144,0.000095585616,0.00009974377,0.00071608525,0.00015049767,0.00057096715,0.00018714748,0.00048035994,0.00025701523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009742496,0.0047396007,0.14377025,0.0021454068,0.0026461943,0.0005615913,0.18670574,0.04688031,0.059112236,0.014255435,0.07713594,0.4523048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021783186,0.0045072553,0.1593587,0.0070731984,0.00485339,0.009669138,0.030314688,0.028630966,0.036399085,0.2613453,0.4276413,0.008423796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012748952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038486667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.443881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060481692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043461445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5304964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115176785","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12036","title":"Facilitating Educational Needs in Digital Era: Adequacy of Fair Dealing Provisions of Indian Copyright Act in Question","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Fair use; Legislature; Fair dealing; Copyright Act; Law and economics; Incentive; Intellectual property; Public relations; Business; Political science; Copyright law; Economics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.037663596711006,"score_gpt":0.2590429421607525,"score_spread":0.22137934544974652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115176785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95958734,0.00047842134,0.0002365624,0.0018326986,0.0003450551,0.00040630487,0.0000030836795,0.000012215066,0.037098303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980628,0.000026018899,0.00011888484,0.00014748845,0.0003320785,0.0000039560605,0.000007282521,0.000022391125,0.0012791343],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766475,0.00009326972,0.0012940998,0.00013721571,0.0005241411,0.000286534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972036,0.0009486511,0.00068675156,0.00019291461,0.0009296432,0.000038433212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020032905,0.00022077422,0.00046422554,0.0015035874,0.00007925861,0.00011129371,0.000576632,0.000061322244,0.00088390685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007246128,0.00010909868,0.00012535114,0.0019340009,0.000207682,0.00192196,0.00014888047,0.00064948696,0.000057620226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018217813,0.006806436,0.08987066,0.0024102977,0.0006348411,0.000051561205,0.2224364,0.011684273,0.020690389,0.005174627,0.36335143,0.25867125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022608027,0.005963322,0.029725969,0.023567261,0.00072357396,0.0004360503,0.156821,0.42652056,0.044164844,0.10821021,0.17580995,0.005449214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015982119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007810996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4148363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015781412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042567457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.967816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141410809","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2003.tb00229.x","title":"Genetically Modified Products and Consumer Concerns under W<scp>to</scp>Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Consumer law; Law; Citation; Commercial law; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Advertising; Business; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.053471670904757664,"score_gpt":0.25110347015022577,"score_spread":0.19763179924546811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141410809","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12823226,0.009481675,0.5814383,0.013908613,0.003168674,0.0021926675,0.0000041623443,0.00023753582,0.2613361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96749765,0.0005080063,0.005668644,0.0060286573,0.0002223413,0.000005489224,2.3071175e-7,0.000039190243,0.020029824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966848,0.00076507527,0.00082996604,0.00042725468,0.0006581214,0.0006347875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624527,0.0015151729,0.0002494172,0.0007248486,0.000874365,0.0003909218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017928273,0.00036682558,0.0005088248,0.00022318277,0.00041683298,0.00033339884,0.0015470997,0.00007852074,0.00018039312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003694391,0.00016583798,0.00011635868,0.00094023,0.00080993026,0.0005067097,0.0003667152,0.0007169473,0.0002541338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004733775,0.0008438682,0.00004891263,0.000119585246,0.00086908793,0.000058427268,0.045597,0.0020094384,0.08521834,0.13923655,0.69221133,0.033314094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012144644,0.0020955026,0.000035145884,0.00017862821,0.00012970768,0.0012385251,0.0006561678,0.01096863,0.20205976,0.009313555,0.7716803,0.00042961937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005300862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004452829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83926535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092825954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039433417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6762677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145137402","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2004.tb00257.x","title":"Bioprospecting or Biopiracy?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Bioprospecting; Paragraph; Convention on Biological Diversity; Declaration; Political science; Folklore; TRIPS architecture; Work (physics); Law; Biodiversity; Sociology; Biology; Computer science; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.1553584027820777,"score_gpt":0.2442732144822478,"score_spread":0.08891481170017013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145137402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7755665,0.0013518239,0.0055317385,0.016880902,0.0044709076,0.0011917575,0.0000020331404,0.0002666683,0.19473766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97547156,0.00007658589,0.00020206605,0.0043715704,0.0023223248,0.0000022334873,9.2788736e-7,0.000045987417,0.017506754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816,0.000029710702,0.000755891,0.00016274214,0.0004729935,0.0004186763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983684,0.0002478951,0.0005106441,0.00026483214,0.0005805653,0.000027707081],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001313773,0.0002749105,0.0003498561,0.00048393884,0.0005274756,0.00027561962,0.00088945805,0.000055647,0.0035448377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001869014,0.000100757825,0.00018390479,0.0013898846,0.00020358028,0.0010515589,0.00024159242,0.00070269965,0.0016810762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.049503867,0.0047972673,0.0031962127,0.0015830053,0.00260221,0.000771729,0.039287154,0.015105028,0.07322438,0.018190231,0.57186496,0.21987398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004891483,0.0011815416,0.00043591065,0.0016018777,0.0005714827,0.0014092588,0.0044643595,0.0026760835,0.03893815,0.018872628,0.9235507,0.0014064852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062339375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031527522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3516858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010682338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009982064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152192953","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2002.tb00174.x","title":"Process, Judicial Economy and Procedural Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Law; Schools of economic thought; Economics","score_opus":0.027041610340402256,"score_gpt":0.21488720019728844,"score_spread":0.18784558985688618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152192953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14634202,0.00027043518,0.00006566052,0.020233419,0.000378677,0.00026514713,3.2344087e-7,0.00003154583,0.8324128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687594,0.00001805793,0.000019027739,0.023785071,0.0014141898,0.0000022899087,6.2850313e-7,0.000010011575,0.0059912903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922585,0.000015228556,0.00035571848,0.00007921609,0.00018662092,0.00013738926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992565,0.000060793034,0.00027426155,0.000062558414,0.00033087033,0.000015031619],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030146615,0.00011866663,0.00014268953,0.00019187799,0.00024066224,0.00016241937,0.0002522543,0.0000186675,0.00318707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016200337,0.000052078336,0.000050203602,0.00022711123,0.00013423777,0.0011201962,0.000044356657,0.00022212834,0.00028609077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046424562,0.00029883964,0.00026428472,0.000101355465,0.00016111002,0.0000099991485,0.0020284685,0.000056146844,0.00045479333,0.064809196,0.9292344,0.0021171605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005479397,0.000074561874,0.00007119386,0.000083453255,0.00006536205,0.00008491391,0.00015916482,0.017613655,0.0010282055,0.022181956,0.95791525,0.00017437422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004643445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008175971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8264215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022942595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014854369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158471647","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x","title":"Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India's Patent Act","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; TRIPS Agreement; Ambiguity; Context (archaeology); Flexibility (engineering); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Law; Exploit; Copyright Act; Business; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Management; Geography; Computer security","score_opus":0.19282305205830386,"score_gpt":0.2723319349023203,"score_spread":0.07950888284401647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158471647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85438174,0.00071009685,0.00043916315,0.012331156,0.0006904643,0.00088038674,0.0000015815517,0.00002077581,0.13054463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717535,0.00004881504,0.000014584598,0.027605288,0.0003263375,0.0000017840842,7.6765957e-7,0.000018955745,0.00022997364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981133,0.00015017246,0.0007740132,0.00012691451,0.00049090374,0.00034474616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983327,0.00072654727,0.000522023,0.00020493749,0.00020182911,0.0000119697725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047823833,0.0002158696,0.00034130068,0.0004060934,0.00027775834,0.0001048308,0.0006245266,0.00004614855,0.00030843812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061150605,0.00008412243,0.000109282875,0.0005263404,0.0002262764,0.00035862214,0.00018294348,0.00074959436,0.000041923897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.038794905,0.004398897,0.016920393,0.0012013629,0.0011461352,0.0003241445,0.1517941,0.0007469324,0.007888846,0.031365607,0.38840866,0.35701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050630597,0.0020739404,0.012758181,0.004218611,0.00044557944,0.00030669707,0.030063579,0.003938568,0.012040561,0.004455697,0.9235039,0.0011316548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076045055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006406742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5350952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071155395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002121931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34304133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524886264","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12039","title":"Breeding Apples for Oranges: Africa's Misplaced Priority Over Plant Breeders’ Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; General partnership; Indigenous; Agriculture; Food security; Food sovereignty; Political science; Position (finance); TRIPS Agreement; International trade; Business; Geography; Law; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.2105814431434796,"score_gpt":0.2490124633452568,"score_spread":0.038431020201777216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524886264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56514657,0.007253069,0.024104996,0.016681496,0.012399425,0.0064072297,0.00006278362,0.00053777394,0.36740667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98234874,0.000025333535,0.00022662917,0.0012017479,0.0027907004,0.000009795979,0.000007561299,0.00004914009,0.013340366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997811,0.0000835666,0.000732768,0.00021232099,0.0006431382,0.0005172068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975603,0.00067668065,0.00053423975,0.00024845975,0.00091293466,0.00006735819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002556504,0.00034080978,0.0004863543,0.000436813,0.0005013102,0.00031861864,0.0009083831,0.000089335066,0.00069048937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016768243,0.0001473681,0.00023392175,0.00067949883,0.00018314582,0.00095107424,0.00021134238,0.00055834145,0.00029332013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056356997,0.00023258444,0.00016056567,0.0001417877,0.00024860803,0.000010857922,0.0059933807,0.00020130679,0.0012464365,0.0007401337,0.9831205,0.0022681167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001993224,0.0003977653,0.000033071956,0.00030135314,0.0002759553,0.00008672939,0.0015495836,0.010941678,0.0020094197,0.0027864038,0.9792025,0.00042230423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006788729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053556403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41720214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115409784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011118372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7560375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562483400","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12069","title":"Evidence‐Based Intellectual Property Policymaking: An Integrated Review of Methods and Conclusions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Timeline; Empirical evidence; Public economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.324350707855589,"score_gpt":0.36071217952647644,"score_spread":0.036361471670887435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562483400","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24297267,0.2135779,0.25091648,0.1651478,0.0076575764,0.012160753,0.00006132736,0.0009061296,0.10659936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94766665,0.020770676,0.0026764164,0.017684424,0.0011689769,0.00001716931,0.000004394155,0.00011796101,0.009893309],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960128,0.0009512271,0.0015726076,0.0003434238,0.0006013042,0.0005186201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925912,0.0035472582,0.0010690468,0.0005837264,0.0021196248,0.00008915362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006472818,0.00048664687,0.00095396675,0.00075423624,0.0004234932,0.00013028026,0.0013046631,0.00010867516,0.006732226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02634734,0.00015198879,0.0002843234,0.0016638734,0.0007868063,0.001809316,0.0005174513,0.00071253895,0.00015924266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005942524,0.00068422314,0.00022712076,0.003581141,0.00044113613,0.0000137531515,0.0031474421,0.0000348435,0.07041106,0.00038211324,0.26092535,0.65420926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015834535,0.0016368702,0.000079998565,0.061343912,0.0008625157,0.00025362064,0.0010052356,0.006695907,0.030054452,0.0004640405,0.8950613,0.0009586706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006050402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090339585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.704694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113560054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036722355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99417573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728274632","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12078","title":"Climate change and<i>terroir</i>: The challenge of adapting geographical indications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Terroir; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Product (mathematics); Climate change; Geography; Quality (philosophy); Geographical indication; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Regional science; Psychology; Economics; Biology; Mathematics; Food science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06783664415558427,"score_gpt":0.23867136156399893,"score_spread":0.17083471740841466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2728274632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8502457,0.0023048422,0.0000014156924,0.14377514,0.00016678427,0.00026184093,0.000011646894,0.000011931837,0.003220653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664736,0.0023853674,0.000010939767,0.00023992754,0.0005513728,0.0000022574197,5.2781104e-7,0.0000010256218,0.00016122726],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990892,0.00013752776,0.00029956485,0.00008507738,0.00020944867,0.00017921186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988645,0.00038125447,0.0004735369,0.00010785767,0.00011505833,0.000057825906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008492256,0.00010605578,0.00017987311,0.000015101459,0.0008667909,0.000070712325,0.0007859787,0.000040930343,0.00024705526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031966966,0.000018045517,0.0000978962,0.00015797136,0.0003080605,0.00016222245,0.00023040327,0.0003826246,0.000005933678],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006560844,0.0006108645,0.0034895656,0.000051506744,0.00023933096,0.0000074281043,0.021333912,0.0000013492937,0.15305562,0.0017754523,0.01903848,0.7997404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013253436,0.007155103,0.5904415,0.0017301459,0.0006470553,0.0007718643,0.0152186975,0.0004420882,0.026324054,0.0039314386,0.35090816,0.0011045058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009764256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070216705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7986359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005252343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005030375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6666742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792719879","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12096","title":"Wandering footloose: Traditional knowledge and the “Public Domain” revisited","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Custodians; Public domain; Political science; Traditional knowledge; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Negotiation; Public interest; Corporate governance; Sociology; Law; Indigenous; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.1467112732269803,"score_gpt":0.23532284817743507,"score_spread":0.08861157495045477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792719879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39030352,0.009137541,0.0069341185,0.04834808,0.003502452,0.0015986054,0.000004089013,0.0001615458,0.54001004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98742986,0.0001760085,0.00005827545,0.0035411243,0.003985606,0.000003993375,0.000001985848,0.00003131099,0.0047718114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832404,0.00020113932,0.0006069,0.0001542587,0.0003738359,0.00033980072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781686,0.00077204284,0.00035035482,0.00023294883,0.0007966925,0.00003108794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00301051,0.00023815839,0.00034461432,0.00032591284,0.0009747387,0.00037824217,0.0007249995,0.00004773556,0.0026892629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014603926,0.00008425489,0.00015415171,0.0008830766,0.0010252919,0.00077208295,0.00027024746,0.0006082777,0.0005517395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008422023,0.00041774943,0.00019324351,0.0002345285,0.0006987768,0.000013127223,0.013544235,0.000008901291,0.0015802047,0.03419539,0.89159966,0.049092144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002624814,0.00022541825,0.00018918858,0.00034621847,0.00019016581,0.00036707666,0.0009246473,0.006247363,0.00047905513,0.014436102,0.9736405,0.00032942317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040114366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009144227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59712636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041675466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064264685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793416798","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12091","title":"Broadening the conversation on the TRIPS agreement: Access to medicines includes addressing access to medical devices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Community Based Research; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; Access to medicines; TRIPS Agreement; Negotiation; Conversation; Business; General partnership; Developing country; International trade; Law and economics; Market access; Health care; Law; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Finance; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.2729941177595916,"score_gpt":0.38208092637995766,"score_spread":0.10908680862036607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793416798","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31555054,0.00094506907,0.0018597522,0.6274651,0.0015474459,0.00079682015,0.000015418238,0.000016447837,0.051803373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8987155,0.00025074166,0.00001789174,0.09887966,0.0014830827,0.000008870135,5.4405405e-7,0.000018502395,0.0006251847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815756,0.00017090837,0.0009570728,0.00018683802,0.00019200053,0.0003356089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971662,0.0015645304,0.0005145165,0.00031301775,0.00016302077,0.00027869086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004107423,0.00018684397,0.00036864515,0.00033686453,0.0005261492,0.00044977537,0.0023562792,0.00004927754,0.0075789443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004299352,0.00007470815,0.00009674604,0.00065770885,0.00028454512,0.00040224672,0.00056343444,0.00058248074,0.0006853043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014298776,0.0001405067,0.0017978365,0.000033343444,0.0003954,0.0000041931157,0.026247859,0.0003508595,0.0001582129,0.0031273607,0.9330055,0.033309028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069114286,0.0005877476,0.0020107676,0.00039758976,0.0000493278,0.00004733023,0.0007339689,0.010744245,0.0043102265,0.003680585,0.97645086,0.0002962236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019933365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048344006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.583165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014282503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011628157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011385598","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12151","title":"Implications of biological information digitization: Access and benefit sharing of plant genetic resources","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Digitization; Genetic resources; Intellectual property; Transformative learning; Decoupling (probability); Corporate governance; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Information sharing; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Biotechnology; Engineering; Telecommunications; Biology","score_opus":0.03582075193752477,"score_gpt":0.27939632411110343,"score_spread":0.24357557217357867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011385598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786284,0.000998613,0.018761642,0.00063677994,0.000025941752,0.000110020774,0.00001563839,0.000002898259,0.0008200757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880135,0.00072419556,0.00021273227,0.0001379235,0.00007087367,9.205482e-7,0.0000062824947,0.0000040415584,0.00004169787],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946254,0.00001089247,0.00034333952,0.000050470677,0.000067563175,0.00006516271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995401,0.000038200906,0.00016323489,0.0000902741,0.00012647531,0.00004174979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010681923,0.00006305635,0.00011540016,0.00004301766,0.000030692947,0.000016078684,0.00026141104,0.000027025588,0.000026769645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001841083,0.00003211396,0.000036007285,0.00012899417,0.00006402085,0.000011033473,0.00014708616,0.000068623944,4.2587797e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014988852,0.00009354818,0.018741747,0.00026222228,0.0003293683,7.4600666e-7,0.009875067,0.030358931,0.8908322,0.0002184752,0.0062063313,0.04158247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086972874,0.0019685088,0.042851437,0.00016072013,0.000111963964,0.00019004678,0.0006798082,0.005719862,0.8805227,0.0006305645,0.065994814,0.0002998364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005055957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000044309336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059788484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000031075426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012691634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13095692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038685990","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12162","title":"Nollywood phenomenon: “The Nollywood phenomenon: Innovation, openness, and technological opportunism in the modeling of successful African entrepreneurship”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Phenomenon; Entrepreneurship; Openness to experience; Film industry; Entertainment; Sociology; Political science; Political economy; Law; Social psychology; Epistemology; History; Movie theater; Psychology","score_opus":0.0800051806415831,"score_gpt":0.23335530300966975,"score_spread":0.15335012236808665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038685990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91781354,0.0009904797,0.0005414676,0.07061474,0.000114030845,0.00055679266,0.0000011116755,0.000016371472,0.0093514575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969545,0.00018179005,0.000023311226,0.0024754605,0.00028873835,0.000006915212,0.0000015644787,0.000014787158,0.000052951447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808013,0.00013161544,0.00094487367,0.00018571866,0.00036477577,0.0002928939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988259,0.00028060787,0.00045327426,0.00023501378,0.00019128328,0.000013907612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026296773,0.0002018855,0.0003849322,0.0004582215,0.00011944412,0.00014615596,0.0013362868,0.000056209785,0.00016286256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011644944,0.00008290307,0.000053750467,0.0028488003,0.00025941487,0.0006381016,0.0004845198,0.0008894052,0.000007738873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02063708,0.008756219,0.07982871,0.0025101884,0.001120275,0.0009323128,0.24358869,0.052906238,0.023161467,0.31300932,0.028545499,0.225004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018765029,0.0023582408,0.012566897,0.0026594065,0.00082913897,0.0004931768,0.2463663,0.35531053,0.0023318399,0.20806731,0.14673594,0.0035161811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093644005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017847422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3024043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003881253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006297735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38640726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123802554","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00351.x","title":"A Canadian Copyright Narrative","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Normative; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Liability; Subject (documents); Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Law; History; Computer science; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05369986895425746,"score_gpt":0.1999083986745747,"score_spread":0.14620852972031723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123802554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1958465,0.016140418,0.00076504424,0.034977295,0.0013098927,0.0002667789,0.000033910324,0.000016627833,0.75064355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640164,0.0005435471,0.000053386022,0.0011495579,0.00018843726,0.0000014647097,3.3669724e-7,0.000005976836,0.034040924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992292,0.000027636455,0.00043491245,0.00007463764,0.000049293532,0.00018435474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993733,0.00011361226,0.00019381948,0.0000917343,0.00012370535,0.00010378521],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004048334,0.00009468165,0.00024482788,0.00020749825,0.00053169805,0.000017507959,0.0002841276,0.000020628162,0.0026829946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003261372,0.000044846565,0.00009485187,0.00030808905,0.00025057833,0.00015738391,0.000030610994,0.0002801603,0.0006240411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028656714,0.00010575148,0.0048673814,0.000007212563,0.00044319697,0.0000690428,0.054085486,0.0001261587,0.00003020746,0.033064198,0.90615857,0.000756233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023530223,0.00014336647,0.00087302754,0.000019555193,0.0000074575096,0.00032186706,0.00050902297,0.00013363757,0.00017491098,0.004547974,0.9929051,0.00012881409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030027404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024008255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7681699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002262523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022113854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124587581","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1796.2002.tb00149.x","title":"The I<scp>cann</scp> Domain‐Name Dispute Resolution System as a Model for Resolving kher Intellectual Property Disputes on the Internet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law; Library science; Citation; Sociology; Public domain; Dispute resolution; Political science; Media studies; History; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.048356816294996344,"score_gpt":0.2180904056685596,"score_spread":0.16973358937356325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124587581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13816959,0.011585996,0.07765695,0.05230334,0.006546065,0.009758197,0.000025094678,0.0008339303,0.7031208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85853195,0.00035417895,0.00011374446,0.003165137,0.0022086657,0.00009157964,0.0000036035842,0.00013997014,0.13539115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521655,0.00039224792,0.0015835385,0.00053064805,0.0011571227,0.0011198838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059016,0.006076641,0.0010194414,0.0009501181,0.0012714333,0.00009221634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042791218,0.0007566368,0.00072088954,0.0004690249,0.0021940402,0.001394291,0.0027666707,0.00015486548,0.0013421103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011849277,0.00023146691,0.0006282853,0.0011825046,0.00080967706,0.0011740231,0.0007120013,0.0015981225,0.0013747277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010789296,0.00021568843,0.0000082753495,0.000116567215,0.00032313113,0.000006959628,0.012304209,0.0006518055,0.00045329053,0.002758337,0.97324306,0.008839775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045628124,0.00032380648,0.0000024541494,0.0005149296,0.00014413112,0.00006558758,0.0029119116,0.56464016,0.00042298128,0.0010719624,0.4292836,0.00016218804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003382659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040768224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7203624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041272189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117607306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179593369","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12193","title":"Maximizing the differentiation principle in regional IP treaties to advance food security: Limitations in West Africa's regional IP and trade regime","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sierra leone; Intellectual property; Food security; Human rights; International trade; Economic growth; Political science; Geography; Development economics; Business; Economics; Law; Agriculture","score_opus":0.17520230439239234,"score_gpt":0.24074697172652623,"score_spread":0.06554466733413389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179593369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91986567,0.004148633,0.0004235767,0.061238043,0.00039923086,0.0007119303,0.0000026408793,0.000030671516,0.013179589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931551,0.00053155655,0.00008755203,0.0024972889,0.00038712836,0.000014688941,0.000005039036,0.000025793033,0.0032958484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982258,0.00020053009,0.0006320431,0.00021023913,0.00041124973,0.00032011038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984414,0.0008027669,0.00027739743,0.00021255677,0.00023824022,0.000027647462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085113413,0.00022371017,0.00030725478,0.00044485883,0.0003027272,0.00020378905,0.00039593704,0.000050804138,0.00019194794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001370732,0.00010799304,0.000095677475,0.0012441678,0.00012887068,0.000699131,0.00018420843,0.00062768173,0.000032591513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02385108,0.0054526366,0.017811427,0.001396717,0.001440303,0.00027500695,0.34850645,0.018301716,0.009746527,0.036321223,0.37134677,0.16555014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033169126,0.0006874095,0.040827334,0.0022078806,0.00025079199,0.00039696548,0.020114746,0.021639371,0.0014547656,0.022939919,0.88515157,0.001012322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012021734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003929134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5138048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093952214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000893334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44038284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204174654","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12200","title":"Japanese biotechnology regulation and life science (gene) patenting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Conestoga College","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Patent law; Political science; Business; Biotechnology; International trade; Intellectual property; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.04268540827712124,"score_gpt":0.2766850348820808,"score_spread":0.23399962660495954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204174654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9213609,0.0020841737,0.00087397883,0.07391152,0.00029188133,0.00011249571,2.7578372e-7,0.000016130678,0.0013486311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951766,0.0005336751,0.00059104385,0.0007364908,0.00016619892,2.5455083e-7,6.622052e-7,0.000007220781,0.002787823],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989309,0.000078929115,0.00033848168,0.00010174581,0.00040292283,0.00014706663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998863,0.00016082183,0.00015458431,0.0001519616,0.00054602936,0.0001235924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015393165,0.000071884686,0.00017775306,0.0002182252,0.00020672138,0.0000273444,0.000115178045,0.00007377714,0.00022110068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021199943,0.000029421333,0.0000419121,0.00088476785,0.0014897906,0.000086677115,0.00011021603,0.00047770768,0.000006112759],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034609612,0.00009738214,0.000088148714,0.00005214032,0.00006698385,0.000020673897,0.005498821,0.00002227256,0.93531734,0.00028938954,0.001802166,0.056398585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023082758,0.0012343825,0.01140188,0.0009861964,0.00040761541,0.0064489963,0.0055588414,0.029876525,0.9000395,0.002559507,0.038858034,0.00032023803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013785325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009029661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07381572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004193451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040976208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54891956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352171","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12267","title":"Lessons from India and Thailand for Cambodia's future implementation of the TRIPS Agreement for pharmaceutical patents","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"La Trobe University","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Intellectual property; TRIPS Agreement; Business; Access to medicines; Developing country; Essential medicines; Economic growth; International trade; Political science; Economics; Law; Health care; Engineering","score_opus":0.17080242288562045,"score_gpt":0.31486270427673607,"score_spread":0.14406028139111562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757631,0.00063174573,0.00084774726,0.016887918,0.00232185,0.00226648,0.00009394043,0.000028550285,0.0011587043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950289,0.00024371319,0.00004381666,0.0014404571,0.001442603,0.000025589821,0.000020962289,0.000026823773,0.001727131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857694,0.00007084513,0.0005779646,0.00014491894,0.0003337748,0.00029557303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984434,0.00056051277,0.0004367201,0.00015496055,0.0003824485,0.000021939672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012926159,0.000186396,0.0002862289,0.00021210234,0.00039382314,0.00009928768,0.0004714788,0.000048905564,0.0005013966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000376385,0.0000746556,0.00018382035,0.0005156973,0.00010980125,0.00030006366,0.00019678735,0.0002664679,0.000027315655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007547179,0.0002943346,0.009290538,0.00061895704,0.0010942139,0.000002878262,0.0109398365,0.00013445957,0.012780246,0.00060214504,0.77403545,0.18265973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010280984,0.0007105958,0.022360822,0.0006229608,0.0017822523,0.000021920574,0.018487565,0.018788954,0.043412574,0.006097549,0.87665784,0.00077597855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023554107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024337806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18188375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031689622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056733035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5489941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396939280","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12303","title":"Impacts of changes to Canada's Plant Breeders' Rights Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Plant and fungal interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.028994549966107053,"score_gpt":0.22102519155890937,"score_spread":0.1920306415928023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396939280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96490115,0.0011713344,0.000004665632,0.02715948,0.00093231327,0.00015493335,0.00010710932,0.000016498381,0.0055525186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948357,0.000084165156,0.0000070381197,0.00052193046,0.00039454448,6.530799e-7,0.0000033950155,8.594865e-7,0.004151735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992107,0.000077806944,0.00023747847,0.00006841391,0.00023406246,0.00017149583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868745,0.0009970226,0.00007652242,0.000032728767,0.000097935714,0.000108322216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031123852,0.000098959186,0.00016607567,0.000043507473,0.00011766646,0.00004527279,0.00031322107,0.000020375424,0.0009081796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014504671,0.00001997357,0.00006506153,0.00039862824,0.000029401332,0.000063602776,0.000043228,0.00026285922,0.000021769012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000500733,0.00007099276,0.00004698148,0.000013750348,0.00012837707,0.000034041666,0.0016983321,0.0000102729655,0.29538792,0.000041818897,0.6792942,0.022772552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051375013,0.00073929643,0.0007151326,0.00036364942,0.000045424356,0.00037249568,0.0005065922,0.00020238229,0.07972295,0.000058040838,0.9171036,0.00011908057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20305754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92482203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7217645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006124874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073677176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399923012","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12316","title":"Factors influencing the prioritisation of access to medicines in trade‐related intellectual property policymaking in Thailand","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"La Trobe University","keywords":"Intellectual property; Access to medicines; Business; International trade; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16249756446821664,"score_gpt":0.2914937874748226,"score_spread":0.12899622300660593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399923012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772771,0.0010989436,0.00014509298,0.009600724,0.0009887938,0.0009313498,0.0000015274614,0.000044123535,0.009912344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960491,0.00013807234,0.000007036488,0.0020055391,0.0005572734,0.000008261758,0.0000023642463,0.0000524301,0.0011798866],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968901,0.0002389107,0.0014640356,0.00026386767,0.00065616495,0.000486882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976284,0.0014897438,0.0003482553,0.00026183258,0.00023782151,0.000033960834],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026760986,0.00037318235,0.0005811298,0.001723297,0.00019478006,0.00038198,0.0012670049,0.00010199498,0.00094247656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042815073,0.00012887747,0.00017209405,0.0038571486,0.00023850723,0.0014824274,0.00035619887,0.0012527026,0.00007030397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007386565,0.0010521183,0.04072414,0.0026114194,0.0010272689,0.0001762957,0.51645535,0.016372386,0.023605851,0.0006677612,0.22271739,0.16720344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007147373,0.0027756297,0.08835129,0.03911436,0.0014027825,0.00071121735,0.07454802,0.15798303,0.036166277,0.0069554313,0.580607,0.0042375857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002392237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030284363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44190735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019431402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019919111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401345632","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12321","title":"TRIPS and the right to human health: A case study on Brazil's health policies and its implications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Right to health; TRIPS architecture; TRIPS Agreement; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Decree; Economic growth; Prerogative; Public health; Health care; Political science; Business; Politics; Law; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.16616617034165468,"score_gpt":0.3331200826656997,"score_spread":0.16695391232404502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401345632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8116243,0.005034913,0.00014088684,0.17331225,0.00043995708,0.0020378614,0.000004423192,0.00006599807,0.007339395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768926,0.0001812132,0.000004813382,0.017608555,0.00071016175,0.00001442483,7.279185e-7,0.000030456496,0.004557047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823856,0.00027483335,0.0006841073,0.0002013095,0.00026981978,0.00033135284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859643,0.0006867626,0.00022793023,0.0002206011,0.00020850255,0.000059787162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030306033,0.00023155975,0.00039731688,0.000526837,0.0014150621,0.0005400376,0.0003568163,0.000023076635,0.00022556863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005203785,0.000083507985,0.00008035595,0.00091560214,0.00015352863,0.00035998406,0.0002401696,0.0006229049,0.000119203374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028531752,0.0008502867,0.00015688775,0.00057568576,0.0006773524,0.00015966521,0.13481484,0.00010493217,0.00039990482,0.011942702,0.7845679,0.06289667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056339586,0.0055719414,0.0018907405,0.002348969,0.0005795271,0.00868814,0.038958635,0.006894105,0.00033249037,0.004766152,0.92319155,0.0011437766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002750797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021015282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16526829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007092032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009221536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404792105","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12334","title":"Implementation of the EU's geographical indications in CETA and JEFTA: EU‐Phoria or GI‐mmick?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; International trade; Negotiation; Trademark; Political science; Business; Rules of origin; International economics; Law; Free trade; Economics","score_opus":0.028316957351791325,"score_gpt":0.32197895311147084,"score_spread":0.2936619957596795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404792105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70226777,0.0024714628,0.0002670759,0.2803765,0.0016293649,0.0012092645,0.000013085453,0.000058094683,0.011707348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629587,0.00070077897,0.000070504844,0.00032479595,0.00019106956,0.0000021629808,4.1977353e-7,0.000013398527,0.0024009722],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821085,0.00057289895,0.00051571557,0.00009876078,0.00042533648,0.0001764437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987439,0.0007350298,0.00018207988,0.00013108065,0.0001466882,0.000061252664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016752607,0.000092313305,0.00015929919,0.00028503485,0.00030279876,0.000094468094,0.0004635432,0.000036772166,0.0017752842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068496895,0.000037708778,0.00006379492,0.0023278235,0.00056224695,0.00024632338,0.00008293102,0.000424327,0.0000093384515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064753863,0.00054727675,0.031993635,0.00018222057,0.00071902503,0.000018096547,0.5453022,0.00009566089,0.009560328,0.18293232,0.16525197,0.06274973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008366586,0.00031606734,0.037209705,0.00046502592,0.00029633206,0.00008725284,0.034104206,0.00021078534,0.007150816,0.0024500082,0.9165734,0.00029974643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007926814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013771213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75132143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085211046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046923486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405822485","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12342","title":"Copyright in the age of artificial intelligence: Navigating access to algorithmic training materials and the three‐step test for text and data mining in Nigeria","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Test (biology); Training (meteorology); Training set; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Test data; Computer security; Software engineering; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.12363905494663142,"score_gpt":0.3397657013387668,"score_spread":0.2161266463921354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405822485","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3656775,0.005955278,0.5948835,0.026603136,0.0019069987,0.00353214,0.000050027968,0.00005654465,0.0013348749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355555,0.00025077257,0.004926622,0.00080255646,0.00031250832,0.000020486319,0.0000020979717,0.000022302855,0.00010709744],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712735,0.00056149723,0.0011918057,0.00035925157,0.0003826142,0.00037747368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919149,0.007102763,0.0002206747,0.00056949997,0.00013445527,0.00005766063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008525084,0.0002438972,0.0005322013,0.00023640337,0.00024532422,0.0009981225,0.003295573,0.000053204174,0.000071248585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033793838,0.00008710862,0.000059184917,0.0011263496,0.00062684994,0.0008650957,0.00095519866,0.000579281,0.0000039125057],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011650523,0.00012503541,0.000042581123,0.00019625384,0.00010799389,0.00004321874,0.29275212,0.0001026889,0.016329702,0.0009515112,0.010041366,0.6781425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010381284,0.0018825149,0.00014763833,0.004192675,0.00012349623,0.00089864223,0.018777315,0.9147234,0.030928774,0.015235766,0.011323261,0.0007283919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002112041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013234543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9146207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004262282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018389804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96249187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408328726","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12350","title":"The common law tort of appropriation of personality in Ontario.using legal transplant to solve the problem of the image rights lacuna in UK law.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Appropriation; Law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030595546660662557,"score_gpt":0.2946379649575176,"score_spread":0.26404241829685504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408328726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91436106,0.00012671732,0.00033467973,0.011446043,0.000095112424,0.0009177301,0.0000063835696,0.0000029389025,0.07270932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828345,0.000018564306,0.00019579695,0.00016642197,0.00003267973,0.0000053316303,2.398151e-7,0.000004000129,0.0012935459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981264,0.0004806211,0.0007125647,0.00008322346,0.00041811538,0.00017911408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855274,0.00066291605,0.00035008628,0.00021983423,0.00018693617,0.000027486683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032503372,0.00009428344,0.0002457467,0.000052859436,0.0004952582,0.000038699724,0.0008536189,0.00003708546,0.00005094098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006653112,0.000032505428,0.00012809808,0.00060872425,0.0006806833,0.00012081246,0.00008663238,0.0005183563,6.4470294e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019599092,0.0006945745,0.0041996585,0.000080283135,0.00020219396,0.0000015521846,0.38388595,0.0017998373,0.025810981,0.5778958,0.0018204481,0.0016487804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037879343,0.0009415342,0.043954123,0.004609841,0.0008121193,0.00003803417,0.057799384,0.004790801,0.15455689,0.1303634,0.5974104,0.00093556294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41558486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90013564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59558994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024714088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000501799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5883068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411284924","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12362","title":"From colonial emancipation into the fourth republic: Lessons for Ghana's collective management for musicians and their works","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Music History and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Emancipation; Colonialism; Political science; Sociology; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0427672569795068,"score_gpt":0.2552337885450099,"score_spread":0.2124665315655031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411284924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23485546,0.013078029,0.15217623,0.23777367,0.0151631925,0.014226607,0.000279409,0.00019096305,0.33225644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.836266,0.00005863556,0.00021219051,0.0030338827,0.0013393189,0.00011352944,0.0000061810647,0.000017582213,0.15895271],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911976,0.00014628138,0.00033579906,0.00012905826,0.00010697169,0.00016214652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983247,0.0008971443,0.00021428514,0.00016400282,0.00037043393,0.000029460867],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007508576,0.00015128404,0.00023159974,0.000118261865,0.001472426,0.00020547541,0.0003257874,0.000034158456,0.0005947532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023481787,0.000056866294,0.00011902963,0.00012368776,0.000282602,0.00015537799,0.000061523424,0.00025563722,0.0000017579664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001585978,0.000059824484,3.1220247e-7,0.000026907926,0.0003208837,3.4715944e-7,0.4004504,0.000017617405,0.0000462212,0.010208747,0.5411489,0.04613387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006182428,0.00034870647,0.000008252643,0.00019729606,0.00020525622,0.0000016498495,0.045545712,0.0008327801,0.00027452805,0.011298757,0.9405717,0.000097114884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014335706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013456968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6014105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013338825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010451063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}