{"meta":{"query_hash":"2d9ae8b030e6","filters":{"venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2d9ae8b030e6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Law+and+Practice+of+International+Courts+and+Tribunals"},"results":[{"id":"W1999654537","doi":"10.1163/157180311x565133","title":"International Judges and Experts’ Impartiality and the Problem of Past Declarations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; International law; Public international law; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Mandate; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04329411309685246,"score_gpt":0.2771378070124391,"score_spread":0.23384369391558665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999654537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19419247,0.0008383038,0.00035693508,0.05967943,0.0002975473,0.0004658666,0.00003727766,0.000020960346,0.7441112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98944443,0.00058168086,0.000492137,0.0090644155,0.0002509882,0.000018774386,0.00001761123,0.000005854763,0.00012409998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991493,0.000049284004,0.00032244323,0.00014208138,0.0002596821,0.00007721539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865466,0.00043638248,0.00039160362,0.00008282111,0.00042097492,0.000013579307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010389166,0.00010253795,0.00014000386,0.000054718308,0.00017779115,0.00019427825,0.00015108233,0.000031961154,0.00019533763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017299056,0.000059602982,0.000032383476,0.00003692035,0.000535625,0.0011825106,0.0001533087,0.00007690282,0.0000015898531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045173455,0.00007356326,0.0016681459,0.000016112659,0.00015474862,8.067538e-7,0.00059452344,0.0000010074726,0.0001785754,0.99585205,0.0006293695,0.00037934867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003545996,0.000070343856,0.016646031,0.0000887682,0.00029288835,0.000112624686,0.002080648,0.0024564394,0.0007982097,0.20626105,0.7673868,0.000260204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008707134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005750198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79525197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000049801897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008787789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24305391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011209810","doi":"10.1163/156918507x217594","title":"Reconsidering Dualism: The Caribbean Court of Justice and the Growing Influence of Unincorporated Treaties in Domestic Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Law; International law; Municipal law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Public international law; International court; Monism; Treaty; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04686909331922234,"score_gpt":0.29065289303055336,"score_spread":0.24378379971133102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011209810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340447,0.0009415974,0.0001995939,0.023028735,0.00023609216,0.00024862832,0.000026432235,0.0000090050835,0.041265175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996503,0.00046423802,0.00008855225,0.0027456356,0.00014137523,0.0000030282617,0.000006190687,0.000006352871,0.000041624382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899787,0.000059974667,0.0004531481,0.00011435404,0.00027290283,0.00010172435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476534,0.0040595937,0.00060168875,0.000106704974,0.00045781766,0.000008848923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002714459,0.00010232437,0.00020758709,0.00006257692,0.00014099925,0.00010383902,0.00018343878,0.00003514415,0.000010928108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014243118,0.000055945573,0.000029287605,0.00008442393,0.0011137202,0.0010260991,0.00010750708,0.00013171975,3.4760893e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005090535,0.00003631767,0.0006304403,0.00008502071,0.000106757325,0.000007767868,0.0004994709,0.00033477682,0.00020380638,0.99740255,0.00004508692,0.00013898071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011256766,0.00021536276,0.062657595,0.001476467,0.0028083709,0.00064103596,0.02297669,0.010253999,0.0029539866,0.7765172,0.10744853,0.0007939649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043644095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004261122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22088529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007974232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013983998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6597711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039265036","doi":"10.1163/157180311x594131","title":"The Reform of the United Nations Administration of Justice System: The United Nations Appeals Tribunal after One Year","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisprudence; Public international law; Economic Justice; Law; Administration of justice; Political science; Appeal; International court; International law; Public administration","score_opus":0.043018029582580296,"score_gpt":0.2748286945306934,"score_spread":0.23181066494811312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039265036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13322812,0.00025300257,0.00032741815,0.04823704,0.00074535137,0.0007821517,0.00015627009,0.000027266013,0.81624335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956474,0.00037403384,0.00011043445,0.0031415287,0.00020179732,0.000029866424,0.000053860804,0.00000840893,0.00043271127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986423,0.000107755586,0.00051105086,0.000113726695,0.0005224988,0.00010265794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659055,0.0009858102,0.00086593884,0.00020267397,0.0013432049,0.00001181413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014548672,0.000112111986,0.0001249017,0.0004018103,0.0005457733,0.00014300575,0.00036496134,0.000045732933,0.00007797049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067812286,0.00005475328,0.00006814776,0.000812889,0.00039249368,0.000666982,0.00011356218,0.00014717523,0.0000048694505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044196294,0.0001140632,0.0000562733,0.00006705464,0.00017582522,4.4923686e-7,0.00020290868,0.000011147925,0.00012816595,0.9984667,0.00032051717,0.000014984027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019962129,0.00016815813,0.016779212,0.0005716208,0.0017788581,0.00007674688,0.010064594,0.0050445437,0.0033528581,0.029715205,0.93012017,0.00033182383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026561439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005867958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96875143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002041864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037515834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41977024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770720438","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341351","title":"The Croatia v. Slovenia Arbitration: The Silver Lining","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; Law; Political science; Dispute resolution; Compulsory arbitration; International arbitration; International law; Alternative dispute resolution","score_opus":0.029042545293394804,"score_gpt":0.2940325446482061,"score_spread":0.2649899993548113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770720438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01920057,0.00051809783,0.00008633732,0.18322833,0.0007801435,0.00020445127,0.0000082946635,0.000014015478,0.7959598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626981,0.0003295842,0.000053055395,0.034537103,0.0009568963,0.0000119418155,0.000008915175,0.0000072466855,0.0013971485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912804,0.000034489694,0.00025428168,0.00012630428,0.0003515884,0.00010528841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978092,0.0008994999,0.00061330263,0.00023530642,0.0004333394,0.000009357225],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015088279,0.00010160891,0.00008919802,0.00001969559,0.0017307,0.0016379078,0.0004535149,0.000030014104,0.00010534452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009556271,0.000048971247,0.000046187568,0.00002032756,0.00042874637,0.001687669,0.0001698134,0.00015427987,0.000021296151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013252687,0.000022568394,0.00016870735,0.0000048140387,0.00009674072,0.0000016186235,0.00006980189,0.0000055160804,0.00013175498,0.99598414,0.0027704372,0.00061137194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000373095,0.000013381475,0.0036231794,0.000025884596,0.0000681566,0.000021004282,0.00020766298,0.0018857714,0.00014490826,0.053937074,0.9396207,0.0000792174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097293407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016460099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94349754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006434616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015485126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810574642","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341371","title":"Party-Appointed Arbitrators No More","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Adjudication; Appeal; Legitimacy; Treaty; Duty; Law; Arbitration; Political science","score_opus":0.0198252824687646,"score_gpt":0.28057154310026616,"score_spread":0.2607462606315016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810574642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042369213,0.00013821559,0.000114300645,0.03119578,0.0006456633,0.00015332979,0.000014934526,0.000029783381,0.9253388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242488,0.00008772736,0.00019082472,0.073481485,0.0012789449,0.000007029406,0.000027073476,0.00000919155,0.0006689152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915344,0.000022209913,0.00025232448,0.00015391843,0.00030871807,0.0001093911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998475,0.0002706085,0.00028718731,0.00009953065,0.0008531121,0.000014571905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067416026,0.00011129668,0.000114618946,0.000060213508,0.00020286415,0.00026158363,0.00016226934,0.000034798733,0.0006294962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044185726,0.000074673575,0.000037309434,0.00005792072,0.00035043326,0.0012861986,0.00009115528,0.00009992714,0.00010328342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024345536,0.000059661408,0.00010475656,0.000011604594,0.000092685485,0.0000024161172,0.00006867145,6.2732676e-7,0.0005128984,0.9924872,0.006307094,0.00010891743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048349236,0.00003981416,0.00057813845,0.000036017016,0.00005902379,0.000026412024,0.00016486447,0.0015631644,0.0005910027,0.02440619,0.9719431,0.00010879829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040946907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027419446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000070604383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012289457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68925416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810847779","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341374","title":"The International Investment Arbitrator’s Duty to Apply the Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Annulment; Law; Tribunal; Arbitration; Duty; Treaty; Enforcement; State (computer science); Investment (military); Settlement (finance); Mistake; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.02122060844724085,"score_gpt":0.27726288899122936,"score_spread":0.25604228054398853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810847779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0105562005,0.00018623921,0.00015532588,0.19055699,0.0011072635,0.00034536287,0.000020853484,0.000023548107,0.7970482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7457034,0.000118444375,0.00010524494,0.25177217,0.0015498863,0.000035453762,0.000017005712,0.000010349268,0.0006880384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986023,0.000047396763,0.00035892113,0.00020758207,0.00061921496,0.0001646108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978744,0.000759098,0.00034728416,0.0001998418,0.00079422095,0.000025166097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016786418,0.00015251832,0.00011484637,0.00004575621,0.0007627842,0.0009378599,0.0005770114,0.000036102683,0.00022037073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044729142,0.00007760044,0.000054535285,0.00008051957,0.000562026,0.0010200683,0.00027948807,0.00015648076,0.00008854042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026636425,0.000054597996,0.00003055828,0.000004104881,0.00016710676,0.0000015561646,0.00014355047,0.00000540424,0.00033575154,0.98467517,0.0141151305,0.00020068181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033925677,0.00003711212,0.00033641324,0.00002284334,0.00005049889,0.000023548295,0.0003781223,0.00086228154,0.00047028053,0.063713096,0.9336662,0.000100288955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011212002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004898016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9209621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023438222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002282107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90438044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889041381","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341384","title":"Terra Incognita: What Happens When a Problem of State Succession Occurs during Arbitration Proceedings?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Political science; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Respondent; Law; Sovereignty; Tribunal; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.018639010263952205,"score_gpt":0.26955931498717456,"score_spread":0.25092030472322235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889041381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6733951,0.00020068217,0.000085642496,0.015944172,0.00027426623,0.00033597703,0.0000130147355,0.000024090143,0.30972704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904406,0.00024291777,0.0003485068,0.008351049,0.00040300883,0.000010362888,0.000021119835,0.000009133056,0.00017328125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896085,0.000016250271,0.00036880732,0.00016939086,0.00037502823,0.000109654095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998123,0.00013915429,0.0006260947,0.00005860533,0.0010393333,0.000013793596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007676202,0.00011777553,0.00013813074,0.000099961835,0.0002019912,0.00049708976,0.00015340469,0.00003478938,0.00018052169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015682496,0.00008210025,0.000033586257,0.00006314878,0.00024315658,0.004848213,0.00011154447,0.00009699926,0.000009184463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073028135,0.00013020808,0.0006909269,0.00010528782,0.00012887304,0.000001597114,0.0006436122,0.0000025231404,0.0070380718,0.9894962,0.0005608327,0.0004715853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047005885,0.0004090811,0.0127578415,0.001753994,0.0004387527,0.0001566738,0.0039760787,0.005284448,0.04334827,0.34335226,0.5830555,0.00076653395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004122724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005407139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.646144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001068769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014284291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4793448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948558895","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341389","title":"The Constructive Role of General Principles in International Arbitration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Public international law; International law; Constructive; Treaty; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); International arbitration; Political science; Law and economics; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018343538147046173,"score_gpt":0.2734386038854641,"score_spread":0.2550950657384179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948558895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20806064,0.0002407527,0.000068589485,0.015354783,0.0005538309,0.00018391901,0.000016285725,0.000008732758,0.77551246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277985,0.0002093691,0.00023349396,0.005961839,0.0005970396,0.000008560953,0.000017105787,0.0000050723825,0.00018767932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991151,0.000033365806,0.00033659016,0.000119910845,0.0003110921,0.00008391447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984134,0.0004242683,0.000421803,0.00007950635,0.0006537288,0.0000073073165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008873416,0.00008326489,0.000095898315,0.000068592,0.00015403527,0.00018242912,0.00020514225,0.000029811117,0.00009557637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042891945,0.000051857296,0.000029368644,0.000055513414,0.00045152206,0.000988327,0.00009879263,0.000088088775,0.0000051153993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002980224,0.000045676577,0.00075327157,0.0000040607965,0.00007784799,6.067066e-7,0.00012715516,0.000008024878,0.0014657378,0.99655646,0.000119075376,0.00054407615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009010962,0.0000499683,0.007841183,0.000055137683,0.000046897054,0.000034291676,0.0010068949,0.011554266,0.0037874654,0.16164367,0.8129495,0.00012962954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008347398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002477158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8349128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012405315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018457153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21146792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990164684","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341400","title":"International Court of Justice: The Role of Consent in the Context of Judicial Propriety Deconstructed in Light of Chagos Archipelago","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Advisory opinion; Law; International court; Political science; Element (criminal law); International law; Majority opinion; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Public international law; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.01025847865221414,"score_gpt":0.2768130375886193,"score_spread":0.2665545589364052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990164684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8804786,0.00025160957,0.000008408452,0.0066403635,0.00013924226,0.00033313155,0.00009779577,0.0000012583254,0.11204957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991299,0.00033157953,0.00014683176,0.00029196026,0.000027446538,0.0000065400573,0.000007584199,0.000004375203,0.000053797557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983628,0.00022381044,0.0005746076,0.00013081543,0.000618522,0.00008945603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966188,0.0023657402,0.0006757653,0.00015125138,0.0001732626,0.000015153238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015411304,0.00009280375,0.00022811812,0.000045161916,0.00002599941,0.000014779855,0.00045122742,0.00004436375,0.00041161382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005403373,0.000053773318,0.000048404465,0.00007297921,0.0006419169,0.00024147933,0.0001680146,0.00016113065,0.000001950622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015593687,0.00048513376,0.032845918,0.000059593778,0.00021456336,0.0000039475526,0.0074345,0.00015137995,0.02485271,0.92987823,0.00011022026,0.0024044304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010968739,0.0016573252,0.35106555,0.0016701687,0.0007441264,0.0008315836,0.072148785,0.009649739,0.20409705,0.14499012,0.2013816,0.0007952205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037250977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005631682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78488815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016244008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030594834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56312585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006335489","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341408","title":"Correctness of Investment Awards: Why Wrong Decisions Don’t Die","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Aside; Law; Jurisprudence; Annulment; Law and economics; Political science; Incentive; Economics; Computer science; Algorithm; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04359653240740753,"score_gpt":0.28328959856746894,"score_spread":0.23969306616006142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006335489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08567118,0.0013160788,0.0018164652,0.15289521,0.0008381331,0.00047389886,0.00007237601,0.00004236862,0.75687426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89578736,0.00037652304,0.00022460836,0.103122704,0.00035333994,0.000007666354,0.000032217093,0.000008302734,0.0000873036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898756,0.00003200115,0.0003418692,0.00015448379,0.00039531346,0.00008875689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983598,0.0006476067,0.00041510919,0.000085145875,0.00046971027,0.000022618693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053030474,0.00011010337,0.00016508577,0.00005021312,0.00012083766,0.0001481257,0.00019610842,0.00003132602,0.0002510074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008482431,0.00007573771,0.000050006973,0.000061736806,0.00017602032,0.0010651607,0.00014347685,0.00009745326,0.000009843039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028008365,0.000083117004,0.00016603804,0.00002281436,0.00012045568,0.000003647607,0.0001546664,0.000032451037,0.00043053506,0.99392736,0.0044269944,0.00035185853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007465847,0.00005385721,0.00066015817,0.00007453394,0.0001137079,0.000012386004,0.00048789007,0.0033813466,0.00075921236,0.027266264,0.96632177,0.00012229114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060474325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003622348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007716191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000168305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30884945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385068101","doi":"10.1163/15718034-bja10093","title":"“Cross Treaty Interpretation” en bloc or How CAFTA-DR Tribunals Are Systematically Interpreting the FET Standard Based on NAFTA Case Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Treaty; Law; Denial; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; Scope (computer science); Political science; International law; Public international law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02730728624092785,"score_gpt":0.3118961209285116,"score_spread":0.2845888346875837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385068101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17199115,0.000331016,0.0030860459,0.36910152,0.0018485266,0.0022213538,0.0008076388,0.00031789087,0.45029485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634741,0.000050972052,0.00008881284,0.03475575,0.00038660548,0.000058630707,0.00007377285,0.000022463719,0.0010888834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980166,0.00021872173,0.00053764234,0.00029850507,0.00071028736,0.00021824686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939817,0.0041843886,0.0007360712,0.00023982138,0.0008279055,0.000030113983],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032040188,0.00024438644,0.00031103648,0.00013047075,0.00054709736,0.0013576685,0.00033798645,0.00007494692,0.00028101445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023912454,0.0001333165,0.000108867054,0.00017941576,0.00031327564,0.0013078451,0.00016395589,0.0002449151,0.000031874002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002123246,0.00009984495,0.00014611092,0.00018812764,0.00028427163,0.00021845984,0.00032543406,0.00033801192,0.000059136884,0.99243313,0.0035319424,0.00025228356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004094915,0.00038285268,0.00071172055,0.0018026885,0.0006178175,0.0010667394,0.0050820718,0.20789517,0.00056938664,0.02019217,0.75687754,0.00070691435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048583155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025204592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004341114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032479296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396555809","doi":"10.1163/15718034-bja10104","title":"The Jurisdiction of Investment Tribunals to Adjudicate Claims and Incidental Questions Grounded in Domestic Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Tribunal; Arbitration; Adjudication; Personal jurisdiction; International law; Political science; Treaty; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Common law; Public international law; Municipal law; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.017636263268486104,"score_gpt":0.2987208441935277,"score_spread":0.28108458092504157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396555809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39875025,0.0049051973,0.0005266455,0.14425725,0.0018203707,0.0011554307,0.000093091956,0.000074264964,0.4484175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98472655,0.0007464831,0.000074427524,0.013963682,0.00024239335,0.000028864728,0.000022037013,0.000008377757,0.00018718111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893504,0.00005417762,0.00039393498,0.0001722924,0.00033482106,0.00010970705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859184,0.00087546115,0.00019856071,0.000087888184,0.00022600053,0.000020256044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013443733,0.000112792746,0.0001366133,0.00011618134,0.0002023578,0.0004223764,0.00013394665,0.000035838755,0.000037729817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002506761,0.00007141588,0.00003458105,0.00012372041,0.00026713012,0.0011181165,0.00011807827,0.00013283132,0.000008625533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017576506,0.000058285474,0.000051173374,0.000032254233,0.00009255844,0.0000049742703,0.00013833889,0.000016009113,0.00041237104,0.9979568,0.0006123689,0.00044909987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006574365,0.000082819424,0.0055859187,0.00027940125,0.00013941847,0.00010059703,0.0003625482,0.0031022863,0.00020482833,0.32117626,0.66815585,0.00015263227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002105422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049303815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6767805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000265217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020289666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40729856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7154589400","doi":"10.1163/15718034-bja10142","title":"Investment Arbitration and International Climate Change Law: Revaluing Legitimate Expectations, written by Thomas Lehmann","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; International law; International investment; Climate change; Arbitration; Investment (military)","score_opus":0.031084552740543833,"score_gpt":0.3069409000432092,"score_spread":0.27585634730266534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7154589400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009258983,0.012806851,0.00020411925,0.14283003,0.0018918588,0.001077682,0.00027748357,0.000051220275,0.8316018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85306513,0.011781485,0.000412809,0.13167463,0.0009153129,0.0001388806,0.00042505187,0.000030133273,0.0015565881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974405,0.00015329181,0.0009171436,0.00053135125,0.0006528887,0.00030478978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996988,0.0007839941,0.00096204196,0.00020987872,0.0010093409,0.0000467436],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016798949,0.00038071073,0.000364702,0.00023886061,0.0007641768,0.0016242526,0.0003596323,0.00013419562,0.00019767003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041805973,0.00031876616,0.000094499956,0.00014005775,0.0005731428,0.0047934856,0.00041597724,0.00030876326,0.000016722192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005017975,0.00025462688,0.00018446633,0.0001732365,0.0005134205,0.0000056200897,0.00047872754,0.000003461751,0.00052450877,0.9913793,0.0053080106,0.0006727832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023290014,0.000089870206,0.00073136,0.00083964795,0.00061657006,0.000057208494,0.00210576,0.008693262,0.00044658268,0.08993013,0.89370376,0.00045687213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001037217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000092850954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9014492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006601059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035240795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}