{"meta":{"query_hash":"82da12ce13f5","filters":{"venue":"The Library Quarterly"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/82da12ce13f5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Library+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1976983194","doi":"10.1086/422776","title":"The Politics of Library Artifacts: The NationalUnion Catalog","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Variety (cybernetics); Union catalog; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; National identity; European union; Regional science; Public administration; Library science; Business; Geography; Cataloging; Computer science","score_opus":0.012169451315494443,"score_gpt":0.2676092700976466,"score_spread":0.25543981878215216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976983194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5688198,0.0033702545,0.006731262,0.009473608,0.00012046989,0.00009854753,0.000066665845,0.00010132381,0.41121802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98518187,0.0006764351,0.0013147298,0.00028932802,0.000025900703,0.000043104053,0.00003294383,0.000045257606,0.012390371],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794208,0.016490396,0.00053879205,0.00060906325,0.0017491768,0.0011917695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877175,0.0077621113,0.0013317867,0.001542738,0.0006921571,0.000953699],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121115,0.0002524369,0.0003906698,0.0044697165,0.025222257,0.025110908,0.0015268705,0.0023996648,0.007845334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013829309,0.00053693005,0.00030534138,0.0090288725,0.025911927,0.014255871,0.014706176,0.0018559917,0.0007903184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008059554,0.00009754536,0.015622203,0.00018527421,0.000016758664,0.0025238106,0.47387096,0.000425931,0.00036590517,0.44320074,0.0054678842,0.058142368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019864023,0.000053311494,0.0062246462,0.0003846115,0.000020282712,0.0008908472,0.5210148,0.0002884563,0.0006253321,0.020946054,0.44949892,0.00003282062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015732406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023793526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012467387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007616638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09045762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041824046","doi":"10.1086/680153","title":"Learning about Diversity: The Roles of LIS Education, LIS Associations, and Lived Experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Socioeconomic status; Ethnic group; Library science; Cultural diversity; Sociology; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03741061084671503,"score_gpt":0.2887955267052419,"score_spread":0.25138491585852685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041824046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96561164,0.0021337888,0.0005168701,0.008016759,0.000040382092,0.000012545584,0.000051787,0.000012563974,0.023603667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989543,0.00030726992,0.00009255659,0.00022921241,0.000011390623,0.000005387193,0.00001167738,0.0000028344364,0.00038540908],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931577,0.004899094,0.0002447319,0.0002900839,0.00058341055,0.00082495244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97304416,0.014341283,0.0024632572,0.00079105276,0.0024176338,0.0069426573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009755924,0.0001571465,0.00036750862,0.0024289223,0.005813978,0.01024294,0.000977913,0.0010954118,0.0026788088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027598321,0.00025117074,0.00024348416,0.0020916427,0.011108511,0.009616671,0.0077538895,0.001956488,0.0001844123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066232446,0.00021423407,0.21925849,0.0001492789,0.000049017548,0.00039108927,0.73475313,0.00007309754,0.00021385375,0.008674846,0.0012040794,0.034952704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008419583,0.00005651592,0.09441997,0.00028333627,0.000025205267,0.00025861294,0.88721377,0.00013172101,0.00013422217,0.005168822,0.012264911,0.00003442173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017497323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026028616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017497323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004014476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044023464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051594853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051898247","doi":"10.1086/651029","title":"<i>Silent Reading and the Birth of the Narrator</i>. By Elspeth  Jajdelska. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. Pp. x+222. $60.00 (cloth). ISBN 978‐0‐8020‐9364‐6.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Reading (process); Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Art history; Art; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009029677888687464,"score_gpt":0.17122506153308734,"score_spread":0.16219538364439987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051898247","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020676937,0.8430413,0.0011446235,0.054725524,0.013484073,0.000021925993,0.00016141291,0.00010562242,0.08524789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15955722,0.51094705,0.00206819,0.021310367,0.017366953,0.00014046293,0.00047076005,0.0005581299,0.2875808],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908185,0.00056736206,0.000041437426,0.000098214136,0.00013469855,0.00007642202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983646,0.0010553281,0.00016291752,0.00009197056,0.00019291532,0.00013219283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013585782,0.001269295,0.00069438387,0.0015819783,0.0034172435,0.005947775,0.0011735702,0.0022608454,0.011585392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048540602,0.00062462356,0.00034384895,0.0016876832,0.008074104,0.010398217,0.00312575,0.003371392,0.0050082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007894908,0.000019597255,0.00020318221,0.0011180145,0.000019821133,0.00046269136,0.03575139,0.0000565708,0.00042520053,0.053669937,0.8348943,0.07330038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005787951,0.000016044818,0.00076482137,0.0016090404,0.000008817578,0.00067686755,0.010701407,0.000034302433,0.00025917604,0.010103342,0.9758055,0.000014774695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011743992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022653691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011743992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027732172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018890469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038756967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058387","doi":"10.1086/603196","title":"Controversial Books in the Public Library: A Comparative Survey of Holdings of Gay-Related Children's Picture Books","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Checklist; Divergence (linguistics); Publishing; Library science; Sociology; Queer; Public opinion; History; Representation (politics); Media studies; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Politics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03204426775008414,"score_gpt":0.29640002748765465,"score_spread":0.26435575973757053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943989,0.0010805256,0.00003743226,0.00041698193,0.000008671475,0.000013794033,0.00025273464,0.0000063779157,0.003784588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669755,0.0013418489,0.00007073873,0.0002383133,0.000023917859,0.00002288985,0.00022578331,0.000010595313,0.0013683831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995675,0.0014418171,0.0004631367,0.0002630461,0.0015415328,0.0006154587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97005725,0.010547226,0.0109868795,0.0010164253,0.0047848513,0.0026073873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041280654,0.00012918352,0.0005104403,0.009040968,0.0027087696,0.003715748,0.00084410975,0.00068037864,0.007121321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021552006,0.00048512412,0.00026431115,0.009502902,0.0019347499,0.0037557206,0.0024585451,0.0010440183,0.0009032665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023885405,0.00023895768,0.7169498,0.00039085484,0.000060502323,0.0010090088,0.24418165,0.000023709008,0.0007014823,0.0008579508,0.003742361,0.031604942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058899723,0.00013445911,0.71010375,0.00018505593,0.000020006559,0.00071591785,0.27879715,0.000033066593,0.00022109633,0.00006717562,0.009690779,0.00002564042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028695459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04870512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028695459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003534811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026489808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057056904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123266157","doi":"10.1086/382845","title":"The Portrayal of Librarians in Obituaries at the End of the Twentieth Century","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Portrait; Library science; Sociology; Scale (ratio); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Media studies; History; Art history","score_opus":0.01075025197167233,"score_gpt":0.23244360632644512,"score_spread":0.22169335435477278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123266157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78638285,0.017956026,0.0008079159,0.015795838,0.0007141775,0.000017515273,0.0003640928,0.00020702703,0.17775458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92018026,0.00535429,0.00025454376,0.0024562401,0.0003945268,0.000024585906,0.00016585576,0.00014274677,0.07102695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977775,0.00081618736,0.00011669337,0.00016217084,0.0004917988,0.000635617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956611,0.0016441861,0.0012394941,0.0002757873,0.00052641385,0.00065297564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015686891,0.00025400694,0.0003514264,0.004218836,0.013370369,0.009563359,0.00060426025,0.0018450868,0.010455965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006063425,0.00036911375,0.00020742771,0.0066893874,0.0068500875,0.0070894295,0.0059887464,0.0018983416,0.0021699066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013941017,0.000023182616,0.018915256,0.00013976108,0.000011104022,0.0012700773,0.8838647,0.000041360327,0.0007435936,0.029108066,0.028052805,0.037690584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003820491,0.00003834155,0.027571348,0.00022665515,0.000008275873,0.00074686296,0.2727595,0.00004258972,0.0004361701,0.00079068716,0.6973377,0.000038096838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028668413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054751787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028668413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004824687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016495875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05700308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151197517","doi":"10.1086/660134","title":"What Do Young Teens Think about the Public Library?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Qualitative research; Public relations; Qualitative property; Web site; Web survey; Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Business; Marketing; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.039751470411049435,"score_gpt":0.2569396112231474,"score_spread":0.21718814081209797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151197517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98754483,0.003449696,0.0001296372,0.0025490809,0.00009288171,0.000022134023,0.000074520605,0.000016939408,0.0061203185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914699,0.0036638477,0.00015043034,0.0015426389,0.0000541558,0.000023286433,0.00006208507,0.000010972052,0.0030226603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927324,0.0001941232,0.000039087972,0.0000544561,0.00026336205,0.00017570767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575377,0.001193816,0.0009709562,0.00006274201,0.00080737774,0.0012112971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017420738,0.00019608633,0.0004705386,0.0012025222,0.001884252,0.0040547345,0.0004419273,0.000940895,0.0027347214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008853194,0.00031499786,0.00035267338,0.0009797637,0.0015386547,0.0020327535,0.00076912285,0.0011021707,0.0007013832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078738965,0.00018302837,0.64742124,0.00023573005,0.00004097902,0.0009123368,0.30401123,0.000021774253,0.0006636196,0.0005109923,0.0032600872,0.042660203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012509008,0.00021506575,0.26636884,0.00033168562,0.000075349315,0.0011007823,0.7038396,0.000052452964,0.00025749137,0.0002829407,0.027428325,0.00003495704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09072317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11703463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09072317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018023289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026564482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18039018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157964620","doi":"10.1086/512953","title":"Producing Storytime: A Collectivist Analysis of Work in a Complex Communicative Space","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Work (physics); Sociology; Collectivism; Public space; Value (mathematics); Everyday life; Public relations; Order (exchange); Literacy; Social space; Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Individualism; Business","score_opus":0.03667349688414132,"score_gpt":0.31013312773647683,"score_spread":0.2734596308523355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157964620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92231935,0.0009383569,0.038053486,0.0016036326,0.00006503086,0.00045026335,0.0015209801,0.0001833677,0.034865547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790258,0.0006464318,0.013011026,0.00016296403,0.00004021125,0.0005053797,0.00073033525,0.00019255676,0.0056853946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99404645,0.0041744127,0.00020253802,0.0005288753,0.0006475064,0.00040021646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98576224,0.010628356,0.0012388381,0.0011785049,0.0007072864,0.0004847738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063812872,0.0006218777,0.0005231136,0.0041752313,0.0059695146,0.0075154766,0.0015918108,0.00092887814,0.0031240464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014960768,0.000490347,0.0003932553,0.0048137116,0.011410805,0.007758267,0.007968551,0.0017471503,0.0004221727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021463718,0.000014640433,0.0029965553,0.00009959776,0.0000060340894,0.00024187547,0.9809903,0.000055493165,0.00086603034,0.0063331234,0.00062196027,0.007752815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004983273,0.000031683063,0.009439481,0.00014654697,0.000012132966,0.00031403496,0.9392192,0.00026976253,0.0013344387,0.0038387512,0.04536649,0.000022550026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006382636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015447372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075154766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031675263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002449904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03374785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203041924","doi":"10.1086/715918","title":"Digital Literacy Training for Canadians, Part 1: “It’s … Just Core Public Works”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital literacy; Public relations; Competition (biology); Literacy; Information literacy; Training (meteorology); Digital divide; Core (optical fiber); Key (lock); Business; Political science; Sociology; Information and Communications Technology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.11026744262637828,"score_gpt":0.26545541073462015,"score_spread":0.15518796810824187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203041924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11870321,0.023168443,0.0016989157,0.17389971,0.0044671595,0.00081626116,0.0027473425,0.0001893701,0.6743095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50819933,0.020279301,0.0064249574,0.06233658,0.0007430813,0.00051561254,0.002511487,0.00013298825,0.39885655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998877,0.000101853126,0.00003111189,0.00007022663,0.0004588374,0.00046106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763346,0.00023240372,0.00009106766,0.000050623017,0.0010020237,0.0009902704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015600199,0.00030682786,0.00014086496,0.0013763005,0.010837662,0.0031808654,0.0009468804,0.0018976235,0.012074876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003683902,0.00023729884,0.00019474201,0.0021989432,0.002770465,0.0010951608,0.0015113077,0.0016968538,0.0011522428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048728944,0.00022616726,0.011153325,0.0010933017,0.000007532455,0.00030519918,0.0370428,0.0001355005,0.0016536727,0.037061006,0.6953484,0.21592434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012075752,0.00003953502,0.038723025,0.0005586464,0.00001124749,0.00009700785,0.018373612,0.00004521246,0.00058464793,0.00072969904,0.9407967,0.000028617902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9586317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041368306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032081142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12431817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23276609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206070772","doi":"10.1086/717233","title":"Digital Literacy Training in Canada, Part 2: Defining and Measuring Success","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Literacy; Information literacy; Vocational education; Digital literacy; Public relations; Medical education; Investment (military); Psychology; Pedagogy; Business; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02335991208470621,"score_gpt":0.23336503437857306,"score_spread":0.21000512229386686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206070772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271658,0.001301387,0.00070953777,0.001998817,0.000043240823,0.000620743,0.0018839218,0.000106768224,0.06616971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873053,0.00074271724,0.0012196922,0.00017568217,0.000010466393,0.000202148,0.0005730523,0.000022934884,0.009747986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947285,0.000480974,0.0002123818,0.0002435364,0.0027733338,0.0015613012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829912,0.0014339891,0.0016091606,0.00027776038,0.007428672,0.0062593105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030222854,0.00036933253,0.0004023458,0.0064726733,0.008179333,0.0053252145,0.0016625,0.00064580585,0.0032367983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016468477,0.00030105145,0.00036278664,0.008337461,0.0027724074,0.0017747249,0.0046045296,0.0012288755,0.00050678465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009201433,0.00042622245,0.8451623,0.00022966156,0.00003185649,0.00017429325,0.022315973,0.00057703216,0.00030480538,0.0034579332,0.0063725375,0.12085541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009946435,0.00009926521,0.9545134,0.00022661484,0.000025908166,0.00007032583,0.024965463,0.0006818502,0.0006986715,0.0004246942,0.018242583,0.000041353782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07381313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07381313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14562407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5355543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395090214","doi":"10.1086/730464","title":"English as the Scholarly Language: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Implications for Academic Reference and Instruction Librarians","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Political science; English language; Library science; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Social science; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.033297488630445085,"score_gpt":0.3248901587380071,"score_spread":0.291592670107562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395090214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60301805,0.024974385,0.0057308064,0.1637553,0.0005217284,0.000119577715,0.000043322965,0.00004526028,0.20179161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905262,0.0030481294,0.0007982924,0.0032167302,0.0003062649,0.00004577663,0.000009588589,0.000011860284,0.0020370896],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.976177,0.016635086,0.00085568364,0.00059323106,0.0036171111,0.0021219796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435831,0.04309938,0.0034554533,0.0012290437,0.004134,0.0044990005],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0232678,0.00023155942,0.00080858194,0.005080924,0.014883093,0.01947745,0.0010695852,0.0017439182,0.004560716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04232084,0.00026737904,0.00040713314,0.005184671,0.024739958,0.019368717,0.022754537,0.0028787928,0.0002614918],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122067184,0.00020669591,0.05731873,0.0007592849,0.00003775966,0.00092721696,0.5054802,0.00012716872,0.0008079151,0.20607795,0.0042999354,0.22383511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030292487,0.00018495393,0.05573399,0.0018064319,0.00006595534,0.00095159694,0.7608113,0.00025958705,0.0007948585,0.11576189,0.063532986,0.00006616475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010309949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013966378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005205295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012807925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12305337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}