{"meta":{"query_hash":"82da12ce13f5","filters":{"venue":"The Library Quarterly"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/82da12ce13f5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Library+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1976983194","doi":"10.1086/422776","title":"The Politics of Library Artifacts: The NationalUnion Catalog","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Variety (cybernetics); Union catalog; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; National identity; European union; Regional science; Public administration; Library science; Business; Geography; Cataloging; Computer science","score_opus":0.012169451315494443,"score_gpt":0.2676092700976466,"score_spread":0.25543981878215216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976983194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4916333,0.0005218485,0.000793812,0.24611029,0.0015668812,0.0015660056,0.00019428613,0.00030371494,0.25730985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376756,0.00003980088,0.00005978715,0.0012559446,0.00039004383,0.00002046013,0.000063816646,0.000008815324,0.0043937424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988215,0.00026534367,0.00032613525,0.000056360837,0.0003279544,0.00020270402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991168,0.0003793333,0.00020142329,0.00023778876,0.0000283274,0.00003637486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004837295,0.000065892134,0.0000647717,0.000027008131,0.0015995473,0.0002922266,0.0005099504,0.00003362947,0.00013860902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019850426,0.00003155431,0.000053844986,0.00026689493,0.00040272478,0.0021601408,0.000024416362,0.000081327744,0.00007238444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069361927,0.000007955787,0.00012934161,0.0000036252152,0.000010227469,9.162239e-8,0.062868506,0.0000058453834,0.000005846393,0.9285458,0.005131019,0.003284852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002575298,0.00010876806,0.0026133193,0.000016185559,0.000008033617,0.0000018812057,0.11942307,0.000013156709,0.00049825356,0.3920608,0.4849205,0.000078540375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003038032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042630367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53648496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015463915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025375164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041824046","doi":"10.1086/680153","title":"Learning about Diversity: The Roles of LIS Education, LIS Associations, and Lived Experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Socioeconomic status; Ethnic group; Library science; Cultural diversity; Sociology; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03741061084671503,"score_gpt":0.2887955267052419,"score_spread":0.25138491585852685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041824046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96296084,0.00042883848,0.0000072698704,0.017352639,0.00018428745,0.00014869752,0.000003906323,0.000056132845,0.018857416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920968,0.00008000133,0.00007880226,0.0006276719,0.00022162628,0.0000071137306,0.00000856945,0.0000037437376,0.0068756714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989214,0.0003622906,0.00013793273,0.00012226812,0.00031113086,0.00014497356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939483,0.00018766552,0.00014585986,0.0001382406,0.000039942333,0.0000934343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042065425,0.000061388346,0.000078303834,0.000031163865,0.0011345736,0.00029149055,0.0004761822,0.000041148713,0.00006642034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008940817,0.000039101775,0.000028948805,0.0003149488,0.00042540202,0.0028983154,0.00006844575,0.000096489974,0.0000127049725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007772999,0.000035407527,0.13665031,0.0000019042415,0.0000066739935,2.7715336e-7,0.8059294,0.0000016971029,0.000026121876,0.023371736,0.0060514538,0.027917244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013608013,0.00029621914,0.1129192,0.00002294525,0.000016065756,8.964716e-7,0.7871762,0.00006143419,0.00015168799,0.023394452,0.075683795,0.00014102635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005249651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000866132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06963234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008841282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045269218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87263376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051898247","doi":"10.1086/651029","title":"<i>Silent Reading and the Birth of the Narrator</i>. By Elspeth  Jajdelska. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. Pp. x+222. $60.00 (cloth). ISBN 978‐0‐8020‐9364‐6.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Reading (process); Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Art history; Art; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009029677888687464,"score_gpt":0.17122506153308734,"score_spread":0.16219538364439987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051898247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4607867,0.015454692,0.0000015640567,0.0013749602,0.001060494,0.0005993904,0.00055844896,0.000104030536,0.5200597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433291,0.0005847307,0.000014857366,0.000442197,0.0004359771,0.0000041333865,0.00001313986,0.00003778091,0.0551381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859506,0.00021169169,0.00033342204,0.0002452049,0.0003105337,0.0003041176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985989,0.00023494387,0.0002835958,0.0007452296,0.000054591004,0.00008277436],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029832753,0.00024718832,0.00032985947,0.0000053193485,0.00063318614,0.00043649122,0.0010387888,0.00007862974,0.0051883385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008046809,0.00013536053,0.00018906104,0.000016976754,0.0013672269,0.0027753634,0.00014990535,0.00031443205,0.000007606716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040140413,0.00014195024,0.0002746985,0.00008557254,0.00013709857,0.00000290945,0.13836046,4.7996826e-7,0.00025459437,0.6222591,0.2350941,0.0029876467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008930311,0.00027098518,0.0005239827,0.00006583366,0.00005704751,0.000004654103,0.04519908,0.00004085833,0.00018547599,0.006325291,0.9462014,0.0002323756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016172336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011009176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71110725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020305279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056828278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99572104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058387","doi":"10.1086/603196","title":"Controversial Books in the Public Library: A Comparative Survey of Holdings of Gay-Related Children's Picture Books","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Checklist; Divergence (linguistics); Publishing; Library science; Sociology; Queer; Public opinion; History; Representation (politics); Media studies; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Politics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03204426775008414,"score_gpt":0.29640002748765465,"score_spread":0.26435575973757053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88940424,0.0012611732,6.074261e-7,0.0068319533,0.00020578889,0.00066186284,0.00031754267,0.00007038432,0.101246424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98600096,0.00006426972,0.000007834128,0.0018794343,0.00017361224,0.000018255982,0.00015746734,0.00003313364,0.011665011],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963994,0.0019110258,0.000675481,0.00029498147,0.00024578202,0.00047334924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811304,0.0006972162,0.0003212253,0.0007547234,0.000019569205,0.00009425648],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004205123,0.00025147936,0.00052486465,0.00018887191,0.00013451376,0.00011075905,0.0011108735,0.00021019812,0.0037470453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008455019,0.00016080872,0.00015332397,0.0005369715,0.0004370494,0.0009469099,0.00002837338,0.00057266746,0.00014782406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017318607,0.00083380734,0.37407964,0.00010539213,0.00046936062,0.000021892976,0.09808035,0.0000030603167,0.000035820038,0.0999861,0.41856608,0.0060866503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022645947,0.0008840583,0.983112,0.000021794654,0.000048277714,0.000029082732,0.001066562,0.000011572959,0.000016194108,0.008931246,0.0034157415,0.00019891761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032109255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017877812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60903233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066244297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001489645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99716365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123266157","doi":"10.1086/382845","title":"The Portrayal of Librarians in Obituaries at the End of the Twentieth Century","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Portrait; Library science; Sociology; Scale (ratio); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Media studies; History; Art history","score_opus":0.01075025197167233,"score_gpt":0.23244360632644512,"score_spread":0.22169335435477278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123266157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87223434,0.00064810907,0.00000396945,0.09390338,0.00067280687,0.00043338674,0.000023280507,0.000032438416,0.03204827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465805,0.00014819026,0.00002828696,0.0006091742,0.00015356274,0.0000086467735,0.0000047734984,0.000008130222,0.0043811603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832016,0.00040359795,0.00035175277,0.00015304894,0.0004704978,0.00030092648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886197,0.000357677,0.00023983045,0.00048597858,0.000009807188,0.000044716475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005291184,0.00010464307,0.00012298008,0.000024004245,0.00094937533,0.0002126749,0.0013818359,0.000063811116,0.00020218312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002272732,0.000042748285,0.00012432669,0.00063966605,0.0023271376,0.0020424195,0.00007727453,0.00017626335,0.0000105632125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011567945,0.00014582636,0.02683288,0.000018903358,0.000030312782,0.0000044715675,0.19015744,0.00005205989,0.00075910066,0.7636749,0.0053724404,0.012835974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000936873,0.0007323799,0.22877434,0.00014416492,0.000041656232,0.000008000443,0.1606877,0.000022786307,0.012380587,0.35328817,0.24260561,0.00037771722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005359993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001187641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41038674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012391529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070947653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8574435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151197517","doi":"10.1086/660134","title":"What Do Young Teens Think about the Public Library?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Qualitative research; Public relations; Qualitative property; Web site; Web survey; Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Business; Marketing; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.039751470411049435,"score_gpt":0.2569396112231474,"score_spread":0.21718814081209797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151197517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36024934,0.0019000311,0.000026212405,0.13986477,0.003229998,0.0007833428,0.000016082153,0.00087998796,0.49305025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648093,0.0006407902,0.00020522426,0.004983993,0.0009919084,0.000022985581,0.000017839928,0.00002646828,0.0283015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997741,0.0005936262,0.00028855226,0.00031583747,0.0004915159,0.0005694991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987805,0.00019156918,0.00015085007,0.00065443385,0.000013024816,0.00020963726],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005051234,0.00017693832,0.00013699276,0.000065551794,0.0015820775,0.0040779314,0.002075575,0.00011054638,0.0055654044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015290896,0.00009591597,0.00012942827,0.00078744564,0.00091201963,0.03783282,0.00007433576,0.00026982446,0.0006088532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019620833,0.00006638887,0.0098375585,0.0000035764979,0.000018450717,0.00001401305,0.23612267,5.5349982e-8,0.000015492631,0.6682099,0.055758115,0.02993417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002087607,0.00045108155,0.03124641,0.000055571905,0.0000211737,0.000013435764,0.21351446,0.000035879813,0.0002823749,0.22992419,0.52383137,0.00041530977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010170953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085809676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60455996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000054668735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044020035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157964620","doi":"10.1086/512953","title":"Producing Storytime: A Collectivist Analysis of Work in a Complex Communicative Space","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Work (physics); Sociology; Collectivism; Public space; Value (mathematics); Everyday life; Public relations; Order (exchange); Literacy; Social space; Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Individualism; Business","score_opus":0.03667349688414132,"score_gpt":0.31013312773647683,"score_spread":0.2734596308523355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157964620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9383564,0.00006464572,0.0001406984,0.009745491,0.000039463644,0.00030572584,0.000005900451,0.000053449854,0.051288247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959728,0.0000055038663,0.00087168533,0.00023207086,0.000050366023,0.0000048446204,0.000014748147,0.000005134185,0.0028428368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986409,0.00043144144,0.0002522564,0.00017237538,0.0002555339,0.00024748215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988997,0.00047644935,0.00016181153,0.00038300414,0.000015684425,0.00006335574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011301438,0.00007602844,0.00019770776,0.00026158674,0.00034054273,0.0000978479,0.0006294047,0.000038048307,0.00028250934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002694195,0.000058489135,0.0000764351,0.0051765945,0.0005266599,0.0013358046,0.00002510465,0.00012896393,0.0000077537525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024604774,0.0002711838,0.18178008,0.000007087418,0.00017069145,0.0000068530535,0.7642308,0.000054673044,0.00048493056,0.03865729,0.0066408874,0.0074494793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016106166,0.00020227898,0.9261019,0.000022305385,0.000056765733,1.7810602e-7,0.060738314,0.00019893284,0.00020376667,0.0025726233,0.009600225,0.00014165106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095173606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025812783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7443218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022908564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020626708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3093279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203041924","doi":"10.1086/715918","title":"Digital Literacy Training for Canadians, Part 1: “It’s … Just Core Public Works”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital literacy; Public relations; Competition (biology); Literacy; Information literacy; Training (meteorology); Digital divide; Core (optical fiber); Key (lock); Business; Political science; Sociology; Information and Communications Technology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.11026744262637828,"score_gpt":0.26545541073462015,"score_spread":0.15518796810824187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203041924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7552879,0.0019371848,0.00005815434,0.1083629,0.009124152,0.0006312255,0.0010304119,0.00036046622,0.12320761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8957983,0.000012407313,0.00008135874,0.006833099,0.0060005393,0.00009284789,0.0014922721,0.000043113338,0.08964601],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988906,0.000039551775,0.00028772285,0.00023492098,0.00012547597,0.00042174317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999025,0.00029488074,0.00008037493,0.00034893534,0.00007013786,0.00018069304],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008362912,0.00016203299,0.00016956145,0.000066678826,0.00045666177,0.0034703992,0.00027241267,0.000043399847,0.0030300473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028772665,0.00012145207,0.00011883254,0.00008137111,0.00012614118,0.0047126124,0.000011707767,0.00014986958,0.00010779751],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110483825,0.000038064725,0.00011277037,0.000027121643,0.000027315826,0.0000060693337,0.6287401,9.545109e-8,3.7740847e-7,0.024248973,0.17818362,0.16860451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018017225,0.00008156246,0.000091820584,0.00007345677,0.000015202005,0.000007349024,0.28754973,0.000054460506,0.0000023405657,0.0061919186,0.7056102,0.00014176744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006491424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005061662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5274266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014909886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042627726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206070772","doi":"10.1086/717233","title":"Digital Literacy Training in Canada, Part 2: Defining and Measuring Success","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Literacy; Information literacy; Vocational education; Digital literacy; Public relations; Medical education; Investment (military); Psychology; Pedagogy; Business; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02335991208470621,"score_gpt":0.23336503437857306,"score_spread":0.21000512229386686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206070772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477426,0.00014494374,0.0000021080346,0.00731896,0.00023789394,0.00010143705,0.000025002384,0.000037751306,0.044389345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974303,0.0000041346766,0.000020302235,0.00070797955,0.00009996234,0.000017119672,0.000014627803,0.000006575188,0.0016989497],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988636,0.00018721244,0.0001685605,0.00016700402,0.0003369469,0.00027667425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995686,0.00018583667,0.000056577566,0.000100770936,0.0000031460243,0.00008506709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002838384,0.00006788386,0.00008487736,0.000043058575,0.00079586444,0.0005712479,0.0003548534,0.00001123458,0.00035501216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001155297,0.00005809318,0.00001728429,0.00037336565,0.00008466971,0.0048788046,0.00004146023,0.00015623661,0.0000025106017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032834516,0.000022513592,0.28909463,0.0000075654325,0.000007509629,0.00008084295,0.27968448,0.000043254222,0.000016223856,0.034896288,0.0013972877,0.39471656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005793358,0.0003983636,0.12709582,0.00006992139,0.000007822283,0.000027715401,0.54224586,0.00091476535,0.00004051754,0.026282512,0.3016935,0.0006438478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09331297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19299345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3940727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038779042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017246868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91272473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395090214","doi":"10.1086/730464","title":"English as the Scholarly Language: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Implications for Academic Reference and Instruction Librarians","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Political science; English language; Library science; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Social science; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.033297488630445085,"score_gpt":0.3248901587380071,"score_spread":0.291592670107562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395090214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7684631,0.0015115907,0.00010333108,0.17809843,0.00045915836,0.00062047655,0.00008729878,0.00038950428,0.050267152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902342,0.00030477028,0.00012912136,0.0068577128,0.0004776391,0.000022179736,0.000029434372,0.0000072592143,0.001937697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990802,0.00012550094,0.00016440601,0.00017811166,0.00025094955,0.00020085735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993031,0.00034321417,0.000053641295,0.0001797308,0.00002451208,0.00009578247],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063638797,0.0000845317,0.00006842735,0.000080576916,0.0056806174,0.002902367,0.00089018536,0.00009465299,0.00006765555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053671316,0.00005144144,0.000029031191,0.00042374537,0.0004329288,0.04181799,0.0037661144,0.0002959652,0.000013797138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007657912,0.0000023138473,0.00058706664,0.000012207828,0.0000043804234,1.9962337e-7,0.28170422,1.0723897e-7,0.000035163506,0.5259023,0.002833575,0.18891081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001574666,0.00014067987,0.008150743,0.00004131371,0.00001683623,0.00000754511,0.030234389,0.00014030772,0.000026822312,0.5367215,0.42423722,0.00012514972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014425734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059427575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42140365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000095474925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001813695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}