{"meta":{"query_hash":"277643bd8d96","filters":{"venue":"The Pacific Review"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/277643bd8d96","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Pacific+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1997230669","doi":"10.1080/09512740500473148","title":"Is ASEAN powerful? Neo-realist versus constructivist approaches to power in Southeast Asia<sup>1</sup>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constructivism (international relations); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; International relations; Power (physics); Political science; Skepticism; International relations theory; Great power; Dominance (genetics); Sociology; Positive economics; Politics; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08225828672665447,"score_gpt":0.29859404778107346,"score_spread":0.21633576105441898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997230669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72709095,0.009753854,0.006510496,0.039817628,0.00015320693,0.000025762134,0.00005418265,0.000010726247,0.21658316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970132,0.0013864614,0.00036136064,0.0002523734,0.000018786724,0.000007847045,0.000009154146,0.0000021016438,0.00094880996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761164,0.001851458,0.00006873564,0.0001095081,0.00020087489,0.00015782886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586296,0.0032176473,0.000380603,0.0001183485,0.00027043547,0.00015002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005834311,0.0003112965,0.00036459477,0.0020397787,0.0030458374,0.005919753,0.0007398955,0.00083678094,0.0022881047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030402725,0.0001172761,0.00020052752,0.0025725549,0.017536402,0.006299064,0.002572217,0.0015179847,0.00010947423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002660605,0.000027812523,0.011968876,0.00018100017,0.000024725556,0.00083072745,0.31699604,0.0006737606,0.00025405813,0.6447456,0.0012261864,0.023044694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064761134,0.00004500204,0.018466437,0.00077865337,0.000040280367,0.00029843356,0.65456367,0.0025839517,0.00046418537,0.27511913,0.047605302,0.0000284833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008268641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0149359405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008268641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050548567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021706582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03667575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024899189","doi":"10.1080/09512740802650971","title":"What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The unfolding debate","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Asian Industrial and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; East Asia; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Politics; Miracle; Developmental state; Political science; Globalization; Asian values; Asia pacific; Economic history; Sociology; History; China; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.052811887142027975,"score_gpt":0.2939980552818093,"score_spread":0.2411861681397813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024899189","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03125088,0.49132317,0.0004510765,0.3914955,0.0061233565,0.000011066937,0.00012651495,0.000013806863,0.07920456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64298743,0.30873916,0.00028302558,0.035927713,0.0055363355,0.0000310888,0.0000622207,0.0000219116,0.0064110816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701595,0.0017479601,0.00013863567,0.00028931987,0.00039244143,0.00041577677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493885,0.0032722335,0.00041392096,0.0002077597,0.0007224151,0.0004448122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009037379,0.0002734251,0.00051694567,0.0015455561,0.004081585,0.010334524,0.0008970547,0.0032081935,0.0041842125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008302498,0.00017466837,0.0003200916,0.004021995,0.013460814,0.010901274,0.0038387037,0.005100878,0.0003072661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005576892,0.000018167717,0.0016123283,0.0013238507,0.00003219167,0.0008189117,0.062046487,0.00025105316,0.0001428161,0.8379625,0.041325025,0.05441091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009550516,0.000028065737,0.0062262937,0.004955546,0.000034866436,0.00052428327,0.14875291,0.00014417927,0.00027246706,0.122213304,0.7167925,0.000046092395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01312489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009800433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01312489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007253645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0087395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052629113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035528532","doi":"10.1080/09512740500473106","title":"Theorizing Southeast Asian Relations: an introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructivism (international relations); Realism; International relations theory; International relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Southeast asia; Pluralism (philosophy); Southeast Asian studies; Social constructivism; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Social science; Law; Ethnology; Politics","score_opus":0.018707373361176637,"score_gpt":0.31620459050462596,"score_spread":0.29749721714344934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035528532","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008122975,0.66400874,0.016207,0.13593176,0.02150862,0.00008459753,0.00016755059,0.000076776916,0.15389204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20614149,0.68002695,0.012807612,0.033437893,0.030543553,0.00047331213,0.00024970144,0.00013456175,0.03618488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989435,0.0006748577,0.00006345959,0.00009595061,0.00016084647,0.000061304585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984713,0.00097292336,0.000080661564,0.00004246283,0.00032896284,0.000103535254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019937314,0.0009375428,0.0008356622,0.0029015832,0.0017875996,0.00397384,0.0009394667,0.0019258766,0.0044287504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026186798,0.0003541636,0.00065100787,0.0038013365,0.005149483,0.004969535,0.0023327454,0.0042855414,0.0006325325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022760742,0.00006125004,0.001420557,0.0014007719,0.000034854886,0.00073787896,0.012300153,0.001080643,0.00030965384,0.8474502,0.08522563,0.04995564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011343692,0.00004265436,0.0013733123,0.0033162716,0.000023719567,0.00033959898,0.0050915787,0.00082913553,0.00010715331,0.18446937,0.80437577,0.000020107953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00576804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044590845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00576804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033389532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002534129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02422589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036651087","doi":"10.1080/09512740500338895","title":"Japan's changing conception of the ASEAN Regional Forum: from an optimistic liberal to a pessimistic realist perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Enthusiasm; Political science; Diplomacy; Government (linguistics); Pessimism; Politics; Political economy; Bureaucracy; East Asia; International trade; Public administration; China; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04245626857097726,"score_gpt":0.37037036225937253,"score_spread":0.3279140936883953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036651087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3049092,0.01906114,0.014812002,0.29345846,0.0031536135,0.00006154428,0.00014444403,0.00012637621,0.36427328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97825444,0.002221884,0.0021937753,0.0077978172,0.0004086255,0.00004198793,0.00002319988,0.000027896414,0.009030383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946378,0.0030836219,0.00020018079,0.0004238931,0.0008098119,0.00084476004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973617,0.0009150437,0.00041559702,0.00014436735,0.00050562073,0.00065754645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010573237,0.0004941758,0.00031066884,0.001601411,0.008550457,0.013268899,0.0009877703,0.004237944,0.0017945016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033878814,0.00033940954,0.0003983617,0.001349816,0.017097061,0.008295355,0.004942833,0.0058595026,0.00021413567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033856388,0.000031505446,0.0017789125,0.00010158684,0.000008872039,0.0004657465,0.05184334,0.0008627094,0.00076956424,0.9282134,0.00849722,0.007393202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045164517,0.00014802873,0.0106390845,0.00052783766,0.000035385587,0.0005947573,0.12052748,0.0031331438,0.00065821584,0.16964287,0.69380814,0.00023997587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02482297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019434564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02482297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011678427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00795724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08473331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046631089","doi":"10.1080/09512740601133138","title":"Raising the risks of war: defence spending trends and competitive arms processes in East Asia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; East Asia; Recession; Development economics; Nuclear weapon; Political science; Economy; Economics; Business; China; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.1624509848051827,"score_gpt":0.33468823621623456,"score_spread":0.17223725141105187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046631089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8090974,0.160375,0.00038997558,0.0052276673,0.00003656767,0.000011259183,0.0004809759,0.000006155636,0.024374994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89554095,0.10287244,0.000114155366,0.00022822135,0.00007103727,0.000004497789,0.00015441862,0.0000019496956,0.00101234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998652,0.000049515602,0.000010634066,0.00001858047,0.000034872213,0.000021138183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982817,0.0005744428,0.00070780696,0.000028048422,0.00033026133,0.00007770866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008333808,0.00015043953,0.00016129583,0.0015327492,0.00015389587,0.0014930313,0.00018827988,0.00030037083,0.0016873602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016277272,0.00008679628,0.00018116365,0.0040968894,0.000465825,0.0009664251,0.00031298827,0.0003590906,0.00014997076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019220958,0.000096750766,0.8071513,0.0018042504,0.00055263285,0.0009773466,0.0029232758,0.006983965,0.0008898902,0.03210893,0.006081078,0.14023839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014539715,0.00011321172,0.9515436,0.0009958723,0.00028467394,0.0003321666,0.0070411637,0.0026254235,0.00050693477,0.0068009775,0.029725939,0.000015389958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019634612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017864628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019634612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010252343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094579067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039040625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075910697","doi":"10.1080/09512740802134125","title":"Hong Kong's political influence over China: institutional, informative, and interactive dynamics of sovereignty","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Durham University; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Sovereignty; Authoritarianism; Democratization; China; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Political economy; State (computer science); Sociology; Modernization theory; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.018941572354908648,"score_gpt":0.30701852951987324,"score_spread":0.2880769571649646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075910697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97453374,0.00013872529,0.00010083763,0.0004632927,0.000008001457,0.000005621273,0.000024961228,0.0000031064765,0.02472176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999074,0.000048879534,0.000012488821,0.00001673642,0.0000014265191,0.000001413861,0.000005753578,5.831654e-7,0.00083872734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994246,0.00023129485,0.000023567853,0.000054666045,0.000077627534,0.00018817575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986089,0.00054769806,0.00029987603,0.00009041048,0.00019978336,0.00025334855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008673713,0.0001232979,0.00015156277,0.00058680674,0.0023086602,0.0033608929,0.00020965248,0.00019015388,0.003192791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013230004,0.00010709049,0.00009783035,0.0010704966,0.0039874082,0.0007991985,0.0016958257,0.00041027946,0.00008027457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026029925,0.0001397204,0.49447808,0.00021885661,0.00012574939,0.002225236,0.35821998,0.002397988,0.003249494,0.09038572,0.0048284773,0.043470453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024884434,0.00011304882,0.7380613,0.0001238871,0.00007242698,0.00009924843,0.20378397,0.002005272,0.0009837705,0.0044502234,0.050219413,0.000062564286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2246832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23886845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2246832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060732435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036448578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44675076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076166128","doi":"10.1080/0951274032000132254","title":"The Internet and Asia-Pacific security: Old conflicts and new behaviour","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Government (linguistics); Political science; Asia pacific; Civil society; Public relations; Business; International trade; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034458457886273226,"score_gpt":0.3013503498159276,"score_spread":0.2668918919296544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076166128","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1374038,0.61999035,0.002145821,0.116944805,0.0005319781,0.00002479144,0.000051765524,0.000019939447,0.12288683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5100356,0.46969652,0.00096146634,0.00628732,0.0008880915,0.000035421257,0.000029094192,0.00001613704,0.012050416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978313,0.0014247162,0.00008008062,0.00012764767,0.00043661555,0.00009956704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667263,0.002110336,0.00053678296,0.0001272111,0.00034116977,0.0002119046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002511571,0.00026571372,0.0003143789,0.002403427,0.00197341,0.006976212,0.0006451003,0.0016637373,0.0025835766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041454816,0.00018443234,0.00016260393,0.0045946552,0.01046755,0.008984044,0.002286789,0.0022587841,0.0002923813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008136901,0.00008552182,0.02285412,0.0023150304,0.00010424011,0.0020784587,0.1619837,0.00038307847,0.0005617646,0.41251588,0.016661957,0.38037488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000192113,0.00013681747,0.036892314,0.0034168297,0.000047792513,0.0028045815,0.20692976,0.00043011128,0.0002736296,0.11136631,0.6376199,0.00006272041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054437267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009107103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006976212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018370468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002121402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013328731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094577798","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2013.755344","title":"The costs of coercion: modern Southeast Asia in comparative perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Asia Pacific; Simon Fraser University; University of the Pacific","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Incentive; Property rights; Enforcement; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Development economics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.05986145527607649,"score_gpt":0.36664014366982295,"score_spread":0.30677868839374645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094577798","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15457559,0.60916615,0.0014809414,0.010280467,0.00024853487,0.000016072323,0.000074147836,0.000008683476,0.22414944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74102074,0.25482154,0.00047115047,0.0004781467,0.00027533778,0.000012498142,0.000028135519,0.0000036049678,0.0028888881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951446,0.0002906907,0.000026424497,0.00003544243,0.000078346304,0.0000546101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989151,0.000587511,0.0002241287,0.000058168192,0.00017378788,0.000041381074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016860556,0.00020997797,0.00027932756,0.0024354835,0.0007207192,0.00277716,0.00028184187,0.0005368042,0.0034461664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014329555,0.00011137789,0.00015299635,0.0035946919,0.003239507,0.002276439,0.0008563542,0.00063553854,0.000110717345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006712622,0.000047041114,0.020095218,0.002567978,0.0001573736,0.0010416476,0.022461925,0.0016599367,0.0006261206,0.7712555,0.0053496053,0.17467043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023615761,0.00029139122,0.155604,0.0100283455,0.0002947892,0.002309092,0.050620537,0.0014756507,0.0011151365,0.22248793,0.55570215,0.000047349382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008342174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011841598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008342174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025134473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014271914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018236458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123685761","doi":"10.1080/09512740903398322","title":"Accommodation, realignment, or business as usual? Australia's response to a rising China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economy; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05061910587210204,"score_gpt":0.378368044745796,"score_spread":0.32774893887369394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123685761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76223266,0.00091525016,0.0003601433,0.15963735,0.00085759873,0.000040387386,0.00004636336,0.000024584842,0.07588559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624355,0.00045062834,0.00016492681,0.01180101,0.000081499056,0.000018808567,0.000016331958,0.000012065779,0.025019195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978807,0.0008209348,0.0000716466,0.0001502841,0.00038508372,0.00069144997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674195,0.00038851585,0.00048538487,0.00010533375,0.0004785645,0.001800193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002355447,0.00017784568,0.00016942546,0.0005047952,0.0059669768,0.0039567393,0.00075555645,0.0022728648,0.004639423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004583714,0.00016240391,0.0001486164,0.00089693465,0.0056164213,0.0025233051,0.004770298,0.0043877847,0.0003480074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002273793,0.00018730613,0.059504695,0.00045006425,0.000041509593,0.004770559,0.5868314,0.00043706066,0.0042333207,0.1843715,0.09671703,0.062228173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017589016,0.00023802648,0.116508946,0.00027973726,0.000013853428,0.0004073586,0.50887895,0.0006366463,0.00094984943,0.008180074,0.36376253,0.00012645902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06063964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09720834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06063964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006396307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072874734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1205734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275054160","doi":"10.1080/09512740500473254","title":"Neither skepticism nor romanticism: the ASEAN Regional Forum as a solution for the Asia-Pacific Assurance Game","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Institution; Asia pacific; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Economy; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02881269198840998,"score_gpt":0.3084718325632966,"score_spread":0.2796591405748866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275054160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23892097,0.01498375,0.037049405,0.1970124,0.0009859268,0.00009998921,0.000027663686,0.00008459866,0.5108353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883068,0.0019214962,0.0016114442,0.0017859954,0.000102348524,0.000028328803,0.0000049915448,0.0000076691795,0.0062309257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99107087,0.0071426984,0.00014288766,0.00024901403,0.0010676078,0.00032703852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99302423,0.0041119587,0.0010921822,0.00046286167,0.00091104634,0.00039771982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013953434,0.00029732962,0.00032697213,0.0010078615,0.0027348383,0.0087201055,0.001311318,0.0040930235,0.0035797805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010766218,0.00017869285,0.00025190294,0.0007770061,0.016377425,0.0062469253,0.0031415247,0.0037561988,0.00031276012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009921102,0.00002425718,0.00031075053,0.000069148824,0.00000574575,0.00014390674,0.0028573428,0.00059944537,0.00008513322,0.98565847,0.001727978,0.008507836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050586477,0.00013998244,0.0016185648,0.00078134367,0.000035158017,0.00063116127,0.03116208,0.006848918,0.0007221973,0.74744797,0.21050236,0.00005965906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021994798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030601316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013953434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003825461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058822394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07379371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620716394","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2017.1332083","title":"Contending regionalisms: hubs and challengers in the Americas and the Asia-Pacific","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Waterloo; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Asia pacific; Political science; Key (lock); Economic geography; Southeast asia; East Asia; Geography; International trade; Economy; Development economics; China; Economics; Sociology; Ethnology; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.08213273634066696,"score_gpt":0.3654997638443858,"score_spread":0.28336702750371884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620716394","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07652041,0.6967008,0.004943897,0.09480529,0.0012122713,0.000029922116,0.00005023955,0.00002690694,0.12571023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76913756,0.22137669,0.0008477885,0.003457384,0.0005670985,0.000025502193,0.0000245306,0.000010591067,0.0045528403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819994,0.0010265124,0.000048495505,0.00021813813,0.0002364728,0.00027035776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983646,0.0007793429,0.00029300665,0.00007308043,0.0002851139,0.00020476358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003954571,0.00031842792,0.00037696928,0.0012642461,0.0015918018,0.0054560057,0.00089772674,0.0017396525,0.0014639092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034844922,0.00017386547,0.0003196281,0.0022371227,0.011408192,0.007102731,0.003372579,0.0020546743,0.00018941249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044821256,0.000023443248,0.006094034,0.0017432437,0.00008310815,0.00071078405,0.021680623,0.0015291008,0.00041720908,0.84377646,0.0133278,0.11056942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019749,0.000111730544,0.025181064,0.0058566933,0.00019337339,0.00079687603,0.088436306,0.0010496748,0.0005344108,0.3915446,0.48620242,0.00005254334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008079544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01164047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008079544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029560176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041582375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02144754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005216099","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2020.1720270","title":"Debating ASEAN: a response to commentaries on ‘ASEAN sceptics versus ASEAN proponents’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; International trade; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11663771344065871,"score_gpt":0.3705870332427397,"score_spread":0.253949319802081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005216099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014535388,0.0041247276,0.00014625576,0.98041314,0.009560486,0.000009642226,0.000044309043,0.000016635202,0.004231313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027180944,0.004069029,0.00027400214,0.953137,0.008556131,0.00004353586,0.00003875551,0.000072559524,0.0066280765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827586,0.007681316,0.0014518681,0.0013728783,0.005079871,0.001655442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86137,0.10027855,0.0093911635,0.0023381903,0.022934185,0.0036878064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044035632,0.00082776946,0.00095527124,0.001928129,0.009538825,0.007424366,0.0036192462,0.02638613,0.0041895146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112712175,0.0007084956,0.00090165937,0.0040332996,0.01014131,0.007932292,0.0055033285,0.039089136,0.001492666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031243733,0.000008461216,0.00059900846,0.00028158835,0.000026692394,0.00084816245,0.014249113,0.0000680353,0.0003849925,0.0152171375,0.963999,0.004286605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014694177,0.000015241367,0.002003846,0.00071198447,0.0000344973,0.00024543627,0.014720709,0.000094371506,0.00044609947,0.0030736187,0.9785695,0.00006991233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03909195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053300317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044035632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012675161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23288542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280616267","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2022.2075443","title":"Realism, liberalism and regional order in East Asia: toward a hybrid approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; East Asia; Mainstream; Liberalism; Economic interdependence; Order (exchange); Political economy; Realism; Economic liberalism; Political science; Great power; Power (physics); Relevance (law); International relations; Balance (ability); Development economics; Economic system; Economy; Sociology; Politics; Economics; China; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05976597948297841,"score_gpt":0.32136922109690125,"score_spread":0.26160324161392284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280616267","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038153082,0.4843022,0.08337317,0.08798383,0.0010880048,0.000045394034,0.00007523363,0.000051140592,0.3049279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8462585,0.13271478,0.010344678,0.0036574004,0.0010826385,0.00008135399,0.000048316255,0.000025955098,0.0057863845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855083,0.0010711558,0.00003874684,0.000082321094,0.00017535941,0.00008153967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786085,0.0015401104,0.00019135576,0.00015964148,0.0001512528,0.0000967394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004041583,0.0005635346,0.00071722514,0.0032900807,0.0010769212,0.0057216818,0.001155089,0.0017175432,0.0013536775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016950938,0.00028987273,0.00050274795,0.0029065942,0.017971115,0.0077112988,0.004162319,0.004316319,0.00018211291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030531414,0.000004027834,0.000107610525,0.00013008711,0.0000088320985,0.000031274725,0.0011918026,0.00047849052,0.000029577943,0.99388427,0.00028794087,0.0038429045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054338666,0.000009982884,0.00027878396,0.00041404748,0.000009272331,0.000058670314,0.0019901146,0.0009007993,0.000045607205,0.96838,0.027901096,0.0000062782224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017262601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017741658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057216818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004170084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024455017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030256271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322208536","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2023.2181862","title":"The UK’s new free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific: how closely is it adopting US trade regulation?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Brexit; Asia pacific; Negotiation; General partnership; Free trade; Bilateral trade; Commercial policy; Trade barrier; Trade agreement; Political science; International economics; Business; Economics; European union; China; Law","score_opus":0.044393211809864656,"score_gpt":0.2554082881545303,"score_spread":0.21101507634466565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322208536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14902586,0.2743868,0.002351622,0.23212391,0.0029004687,0.0000642879,0.00023316078,0.00005936328,0.3388546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82164353,0.1349868,0.0012227043,0.01823328,0.00042329342,0.000031483458,0.00012326027,0.000032268697,0.023303336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955858,0.0019355273,0.00027987047,0.00032919328,0.0013717988,0.00049774867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425864,0.0020856578,0.00079727534,0.0004121179,0.0020305081,0.00041580596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055775205,0.00012618415,0.00019613138,0.000878483,0.0020084688,0.009412242,0.0004850328,0.0015659177,0.0017420838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011175749,0.000131561,0.00015021034,0.0026159226,0.004131003,0.00507274,0.0013960659,0.0022519394,0.00032001137],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007151508,0.000031199655,0.009875795,0.0017383569,0.00007685161,0.0008696423,0.04195184,0.00051669765,0.0009391542,0.55180216,0.10346672,0.28866023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010466529,0.00004728018,0.02854284,0.0018925489,0.000040968618,0.00018963545,0.01926205,0.0001137043,0.00047249734,0.013901713,0.9354856,0.000040665618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11682257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15270185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11682257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071087223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015879655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2322852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}