{"meta":{"query_hash":"277643bd8d96","filters":{"venue":"The Pacific Review"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/277643bd8d96","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Pacific+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1997230669","doi":"10.1080/09512740500473148","title":"Is ASEAN powerful? Neo-realist versus constructivist approaches to power in Southeast Asia<sup>1</sup>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constructivism (international relations); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; International relations; Power (physics); Political science; Skepticism; International relations theory; Great power; Dominance (genetics); Sociology; Positive economics; Politics; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08225828672665447,"score_gpt":0.29859404778107346,"score_spread":0.21633576105441898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997230669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039197463,0.004553043,0.000034780795,0.038521122,0.0002721143,0.0007190211,0.000038025264,0.000039101178,0.95190305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897699,0.001161654,0.00021418829,0.00035730854,0.00019540028,0.000039246326,0.000029758918,0.000015112012,0.008217457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983231,0.0002669028,0.0003362387,0.00026162594,0.0004812772,0.00033084402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941003,0.00012176021,0.000095108764,0.00024038115,0.000057209192,0.00007548128],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012527426,0.00015663583,0.00025875037,0.00006337976,0.00024617923,0.00010216455,0.0004236001,0.00004625003,0.0008600639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001245178,0.000111404006,0.0001112775,0.0004829404,0.00025847595,0.00010531108,0.000052837342,0.00013920326,0.00087051856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006389089,0.000093383,0.0028996551,0.00013690816,0.000043155615,0.000010814124,0.009424164,0.000015383506,0.0000033071337,0.89390427,0.083475396,0.009929692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004121121,0.000035040906,0.002540791,0.0010143704,0.00003240016,0.0000051844136,0.018860225,0.000021894966,0.000012398816,0.006355533,0.9703316,0.00037843693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085147936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029875906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98585016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012029621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001338479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024899189","doi":"10.1080/09512740802650971","title":"What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The unfolding debate","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Asian Industrial and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; East Asia; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Politics; Miracle; Developmental state; Political science; Globalization; Asian values; Asia pacific; Economic history; Sociology; History; China; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.052811887142027975,"score_gpt":0.2939980552818093,"score_spread":0.2411861681397813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024899189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004065088,0.02419363,0.00007625488,0.7004607,0.002114125,0.0030538249,0.000005845822,0.00008321875,0.26594734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82837665,0.09017966,0.00027567815,0.025811505,0.0008455864,0.00021334787,0.000009658591,0.00003122784,0.054256663],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824363,0.00038609857,0.00040200163,0.00022689697,0.0002897024,0.00045167416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932176,0.00006786996,0.00013801779,0.00031161043,0.000033003365,0.00012771097],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003411114,0.00016298707,0.00024693814,0.00001913551,0.0014498164,0.00039820932,0.00089648913,0.000038445585,0.000649238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013015389,0.00007306489,0.000098887795,0.0004121428,0.00013634679,0.0002932891,0.00008305144,0.00017961461,0.0020958297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085046495,0.000012705442,0.00006371623,0.000014699912,0.000033636457,0.000002486803,0.045040302,0.0000036210463,0.0000043058753,0.0021963557,0.09422045,0.8583992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061010338,0.000009213435,0.00064342807,0.0006815842,0.000017885499,0.0000065375607,0.03663841,0.0000010110695,0.000009033859,0.00078897155,0.961002,0.00014094038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007818162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036939027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86678153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021490079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028252075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035528532","doi":"10.1080/09512740500473106","title":"Theorizing Southeast Asian Relations: an introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructivism (international relations); Realism; International relations theory; International relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Southeast asia; Pluralism (philosophy); Southeast Asian studies; Social constructivism; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Social science; Law; Ethnology; Politics","score_opus":0.018707373361176637,"score_gpt":0.31620459050462596,"score_spread":0.29749721714344934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035528532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018233735,0.008496531,0.0008088252,0.031847563,0.00015485389,0.0003243633,0.0000053012795,0.000057000754,0.9581232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649551,0.0041635013,0.0002576822,0.00018176655,0.0027662127,0.000041026135,0.00004104543,0.000011193218,0.027582478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900335,0.00030031957,0.00020630122,0.000119706005,0.00022979216,0.0001405248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995115,0.00004601221,0.00009987692,0.0002229459,0.00008918762,0.000030510511],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013694669,0.00006035937,0.0000873758,0.000035820827,0.00068508665,0.00005858476,0.00017380963,0.000032690405,0.0009481159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017366979,0.000040208903,0.00006594053,0.00028315414,0.00015272961,0.00020972434,0.000009555483,0.000103815095,0.0005433579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.042433e-7,0.0000118405405,0.00008498661,0.000008697547,0.0000032452147,1.1252286e-7,0.00070465426,0.0000060748707,0.0000029658124,0.9835272,0.008042574,0.0076069892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024791321,0.0000060640864,0.0005920585,0.000085623076,0.000021631653,0.0000028059985,0.0019113348,0.000021311484,8.5033554e-7,0.22466165,0.77261424,0.000057614146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026405373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000072345654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96477276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006097352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053707787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036651087","doi":"10.1080/09512740500338895","title":"Japan's changing conception of the ASEAN Regional Forum: from an optimistic liberal to a pessimistic realist perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Enthusiasm; Political science; Diplomacy; Government (linguistics); Pessimism; Politics; Political economy; Bureaucracy; East Asia; International trade; Public administration; China; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04245626857097726,"score_gpt":0.37037036225937253,"score_spread":0.3279140936883953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036651087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010231966,0.019383362,0.0025282807,0.1282865,0.00028613166,0.002165793,0.00025343537,0.000076535296,0.836788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98913753,0.0028836867,0.00035670525,0.002327427,0.0006459746,0.00004257117,0.000019614396,0.000008959275,0.004577511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884856,0.00025735315,0.0002097019,0.00014807242,0.00035084708,0.00018544905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921113,0.0001357978,0.00012975266,0.00026231882,0.00019219235,0.000068828755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005753961,0.00008193147,0.00014544516,0.000034291475,0.0004694741,0.00003289103,0.00036031366,0.000032145126,0.00042591532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034241044,0.000049235314,0.00011433047,0.00030968562,0.00023914235,0.00010694385,0.00003668278,0.000100413214,0.000053513388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006427854,0.000025744788,0.000048031892,0.000014372359,0.000017154895,1.532317e-7,0.016101832,0.00012077417,0.0000107179,0.97082406,0.0068718293,0.0059589082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005249088,0.00014734712,0.0057892567,0.005381314,0.00044736385,0.000012212323,0.08057987,0.0041184756,0.00002726069,0.24741286,0.6548852,0.00067392923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013365056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036037204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97890556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020519305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010595658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4663474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046631089","doi":"10.1080/09512740601133138","title":"Raising the risks of war: defence spending trends and competitive arms processes in East Asia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; East Asia; Recession; Development economics; Nuclear weapon; Political science; Economy; Economics; Business; China; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.1624509848051827,"score_gpt":0.33468823621623456,"score_spread":0.17223725141105187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046631089","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032671604,0.7742972,0.00011689681,0.002845422,0.00012520123,0.00028492062,0.000060772527,0.000010633585,0.18958738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80690473,0.19270317,0.00003898781,0.00010808916,0.000040826802,0.000008259638,0.0000019357244,0.0000074182853,0.0001865599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894327,0.000036954058,0.000557126,0.00020037766,0.00003705001,0.00022523869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991237,0.00029597143,0.00027372272,0.00025691369,0.000022547298,0.000027140284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019695088,0.00012778485,0.0004595581,0.0001024743,0.00011215211,0.00001243902,0.00018778352,0.000024560328,0.00005267316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028898328,0.00008020449,0.00006963864,0.0005640867,0.00023252395,0.000068527654,0.000051911487,0.00013123661,0.0000450164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006436734,0.0001774633,0.5154681,0.007634233,0.00024903208,0.000012536405,0.055059854,0.000012016458,0.000008466517,0.26101014,0.0027193765,0.15758438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061361335,0.00012488218,0.5633227,0.00529197,0.00009316419,0.000063198815,0.013970365,0.000026853146,0.00005703538,0.03415585,0.38164663,0.00063373684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018660775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021240959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77423316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022046606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007353163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32706442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075910697","doi":"10.1080/09512740802134125","title":"Hong Kong's political influence over China: institutional, informative, and interactive dynamics of sovereignty","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Durham University; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Sovereignty; Authoritarianism; Democratization; China; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Political economy; State (computer science); Sociology; Modernization theory; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.018941572354908648,"score_gpt":0.30701852951987324,"score_spread":0.2880769571649646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075910697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44694987,0.01074772,0.00016758313,0.0039026164,0.00016518295,0.00060506864,0.00011576812,0.00005199278,0.5372942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767565,0.022371544,0.00004541441,0.00034878004,0.00004384805,0.0000047524836,0.0000059730796,0.0000041609533,0.00041903142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988249,0.00020638296,0.00029307703,0.00010125185,0.00030126146,0.00027315386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923605,0.00020837055,0.00013562132,0.00019476922,0.00010585384,0.00011934945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048741876,0.00010201751,0.00024842622,0.000029322966,0.00045616343,0.000019311527,0.00019904472,0.00004564094,0.000068777044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062720507,0.000068627916,0.00006975781,0.00021397253,0.0015594452,0.0003547066,0.00006387424,0.00019287375,0.000030353516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032708008,0.000022157425,0.004501188,0.00020945538,0.000018590783,0.0000028411173,0.004441205,0.0000030547899,4.2381973e-7,0.9892527,0.00046461503,0.001080506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015433915,0.0003036379,0.4833961,0.01204338,0.00044825542,0.00038738563,0.035162494,0.0012985242,0.0000897253,0.18499704,0.27862918,0.0017008595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006941001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041289353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80425566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012951656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026900187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57458407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076166128","doi":"10.1080/0951274032000132254","title":"The Internet and Asia-Pacific security: Old conflicts and new behaviour","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Government (linguistics); Political science; Asia pacific; Civil society; Public relations; Business; International trade; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034458457886273226,"score_gpt":0.3013503498159276,"score_spread":0.2668918919296544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076166128","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008083112,0.6714268,0.000005049034,0.032660816,0.00040348477,0.0009647864,0.0000069595917,0.00006050446,0.28638852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50519,0.4787265,0.0000077593595,0.00035485238,0.00007497894,0.000024024903,9.874009e-7,0.000008511928,0.015612346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832314,0.0005945283,0.0002440263,0.00024128162,0.0002722277,0.00032481487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990668,0.00031951946,0.000108747576,0.00030338904,0.00005213376,0.00014936618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021057946,0.00015933385,0.00028440676,0.000014172548,0.0010098444,0.00020468481,0.00023149648,0.000055686454,0.000115511604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042638803,0.000090060494,0.0000743552,0.00021379569,0.0007910839,0.000095346004,0.00007616665,0.00022977429,0.000045518747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007963659,0.000035840807,0.0041835452,0.0002603143,0.00010106486,0.000007752478,0.11232221,9.006907e-9,0.0000017892811,0.65766144,0.16635936,0.05905873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092787515,0.000017489885,0.00043385298,0.0003854959,0.0000876114,0.000013481199,0.020641183,3.247013e-7,0.0000038263015,0.007897467,0.97030276,0.00012373911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088165636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015852688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8039434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022669466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057876005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77670085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094577798","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2013.755344","title":"The costs of coercion: modern Southeast Asia in comparative perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Asia Pacific; Simon Fraser University; University of the Pacific","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Incentive; Property rights; Enforcement; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Development economics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.05986145527607649,"score_gpt":0.36664014366982295,"score_spread":0.30677868839374645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094577798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002442932,0.13436727,0.000029360866,0.034349553,0.00008353669,0.0011256653,0.000010418795,0.000013426664,0.8275778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711068,0.025951363,0.0000050044714,0.00014498855,0.000045781653,0.000060626055,3.0331805e-7,0.000003032438,0.002682096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998686,0.00050883077,0.00020658676,0.000103133025,0.00025866416,0.00023678674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990321,0.0004088839,0.00011162767,0.00023536413,0.00015634786,0.00005571489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088606746,0.000073521966,0.00022994503,0.0000069067146,0.00023204151,0.000031504704,0.00034543034,0.000024484933,0.00013406822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026630875,0.00003666788,0.00007105727,0.00021076595,0.0006292436,0.00007733081,0.000028387194,0.00013662915,0.0002602384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032341206,0.000017174358,0.0001247129,0.000025746489,0.000008731238,2.0174295e-7,0.018623006,2.0864964e-7,0.000006304981,0.9730241,0.0026606903,0.0055059404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003085174,0.000056738176,0.013371353,0.0030679351,0.000060698865,0.0000022457411,0.2237558,0.00025829117,0.000033189743,0.12344755,0.6353027,0.00033492054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004425716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009520885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100161305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008526696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66903883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123685761","doi":"10.1080/09512740903398322","title":"Accommodation, realignment, or business as usual? Australia's response to a rising China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economy; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05061910587210204,"score_gpt":0.378368044745796,"score_spread":0.32774893887369394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123685761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0800439,0.01059023,0.00043793113,0.2619963,0.0038690371,0.00468619,0.00007590124,0.00030364378,0.63799685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89212257,0.043845907,0.000319499,0.0007426848,0.00058674836,0.00012163313,0.000010029274,0.00002284618,0.062228087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979574,0.00067584723,0.0003274594,0.00025079644,0.00040407476,0.000384386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871844,0.00030869766,0.00014143682,0.0005604918,0.0001378178,0.00013313482],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045667444,0.00016231953,0.00031905554,0.000035952064,0.0011804394,0.00011774996,0.0004596909,0.00006803075,0.0015654855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016568552,0.000089781446,0.000085678905,0.00090025034,0.00019960813,0.00011074346,0.00007698883,0.00021335148,0.00079039787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008800674,0.0001383148,0.0012218327,0.00069423066,0.00012533819,0.000039335937,0.089240275,0.0000049157597,0.00050655176,0.047012996,0.73572487,0.124411255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000855231,0.0000310713,0.004133615,0.00048344492,0.000043237535,0.000008950893,0.005778588,4.3446823e-7,0.0000074723434,0.000719291,0.98854256,0.00016583649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002130889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001999932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81207865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041759486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015260064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275054160","doi":"10.1080/09512740500473254","title":"Neither skepticism nor romanticism: the ASEAN Regional Forum as a solution for the Asia-Pacific Assurance Game","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Institution; Asia pacific; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Economy; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02881269198840998,"score_gpt":0.3084718325632966,"score_spread":0.2796591405748866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275054160","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004636754,0.06613816,0.003645972,0.6051909,0.0011512926,0.003386835,0.000029404016,0.00009299059,0.31990075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8482983,0.040768456,0.00027238665,0.004308437,0.0013462743,0.00066765177,0.000047303478,0.00003964482,0.10425155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980562,0.00030117406,0.0003571958,0.00022322127,0.00064314256,0.00041907086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835175,0.0008527221,0.00023592717,0.00034597694,0.0001784831,0.000035123023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002314384,0.00016557513,0.00020885945,0.000022589793,0.001262225,0.00014654634,0.00073653436,0.00005296089,0.00027250737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002440878,0.00007646858,0.0002530978,0.00029487672,0.00041090068,0.00014214362,0.000039991537,0.00015735086,0.00046983117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019261217,0.00003868234,0.00015042497,0.00007884909,0.000053355026,0.0000011776477,0.0011575947,0.0000042597435,0.000044170818,0.49431667,0.48781562,0.01631992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011335777,0.000015708518,0.0018322276,0.00044852123,0.00006554238,0.000007238013,0.0011899098,0.00014812837,0.000009943031,0.025674744,0.9703619,0.00013280478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004639434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052097026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84783465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076057884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001608707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97081417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620716394","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2017.1332083","title":"Contending regionalisms: hubs and challengers in the Americas and the Asia-Pacific","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Waterloo; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Asia pacific; Political science; Key (lock); Economic geography; Southeast asia; East Asia; Geography; International trade; Economy; Development economics; China; Economics; Sociology; Ethnology; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.08213273634066696,"score_gpt":0.3654997638443858,"score_spread":0.28336702750371884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620716394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027999189,0.08526757,0.0000044820604,0.44088686,0.00021076332,0.0007376623,0.0000017010041,0.000010614397,0.47008044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69489527,0.30224037,0.0000100493835,0.00065877056,0.000082954946,0.00004286196,9.2082877e-7,0.0000031689137,0.0020656686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988029,0.0004768067,0.00016302001,0.00013243881,0.00027268,0.00015216609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991073,0.00039870795,0.00017055689,0.00026660887,0.000034674595,0.000022156373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037104797,0.000082054175,0.00017850393,0.00001548451,0.001219039,0.00022223472,0.00053733255,0.000021688104,0.000028345126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043441108,0.000034648674,0.000047685116,0.00006563547,0.0012440581,0.00012821246,0.000056826448,0.00013396381,0.000020542153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001747106,0.000011592625,0.0008967634,0.000098904995,0.000033215536,0.000007247738,0.042615842,2.4756716e-8,0.0000033445808,0.9034069,0.016661156,0.036247537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000257061,0.0000067746064,0.0063755526,0.0008579655,0.000025829544,0.000012355107,0.021469016,0.0000060925204,7.729539e-7,0.015032343,0.9558544,0.00010179456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000270645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009057254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9391933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001634719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031912165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9375985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005216099","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2020.1720270","title":"Debating ASEAN: a response to commentaries on ‘ASEAN sceptics versus ASEAN proponents’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; International trade; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11663771344065871,"score_gpt":0.3705870332427397,"score_spread":0.253949319802081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005216099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020931803,0.003948679,0.00008621119,0.83734536,0.0009035418,0.0020580634,0.000035419765,0.00014997882,0.13454093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95717996,0.0063003744,0.0005752243,0.031549655,0.0005026799,0.00008475682,0.000039807477,0.000024996438,0.0037425214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807954,0.00066024315,0.0002501766,0.0001884395,0.0005789536,0.00024267174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988156,0.00068811706,0.000092597256,0.00016595906,0.000076524506,0.00016117841],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017608098,0.000119025906,0.00018028602,0.000024670206,0.0005855094,0.00010203441,0.00042426863,0.000023340595,0.00060233823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024988032,0.00008236652,0.00007964232,0.00032710965,0.00011332068,0.00007615342,0.00008313297,0.00014307538,0.0012046233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032838257,0.00018772879,0.00077665,0.0006591859,0.00020489767,0.000052065378,0.08943685,0.000012572217,0.00029904483,0.09719886,0.72538817,0.08250013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022551193,0.00015436106,0.00015883533,0.0009097746,0.000026921696,3.0272284e-7,0.0046501583,0.00001282535,0.000080575446,0.0001489716,0.99348295,0.00014879902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006119961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044684668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9362482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013661859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013990226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280616267","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2022.2075443","title":"Realism, liberalism and regional order in East Asia: toward a hybrid approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; East Asia; Mainstream; Liberalism; Economic interdependence; Order (exchange); Political economy; Realism; Economic liberalism; Political science; Great power; Power (physics); Relevance (law); International relations; Balance (ability); Development economics; Economic system; Economy; Sociology; Politics; Economics; China; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05976597948297841,"score_gpt":0.32136922109690125,"score_spread":0.26160324161392284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280616267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076597556,0.043611083,0.00008335708,0.036839783,0.000064156724,0.00060431124,0.00002673881,0.00002325638,0.9179813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9079781,0.065315984,0.00036544024,0.0034952583,0.0002755071,0.00043681712,0.00007432522,0.000018140103,0.022040397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988138,0.00037711795,0.00018152111,0.00013860641,0.0003390226,0.00014992933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999655,0.000056893667,0.00007399539,0.00013415037,0.000041679952,0.000038272196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013194898,0.00006330676,0.00013151426,0.000044651217,0.00040293363,0.000029949797,0.00022084368,0.000014042756,0.00041707483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008722152,0.00004562917,0.00004819152,0.00036391462,0.00014462831,0.000067892426,0.00007231744,0.00018653189,0.000016913238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028979011,0.000025194888,0.00006619274,0.00004295967,0.0000077947,0.0000024445535,0.0059731957,0.000008758108,2.1938378e-7,0.96034926,0.029008182,0.004512869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008241542,0.000008702255,0.00030232428,0.000088292814,0.000012077705,0.000037602258,0.0034674003,0.0000973638,4.9032074e-8,0.041817024,0.95401293,0.00007379083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006072518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013212293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9250048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007998287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103100225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4566677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322208536","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2023.2181862","title":"The UK’s new free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific: how closely is it adopting US trade regulation?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pacific Review","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Brexit; Asia pacific; Negotiation; General partnership; Free trade; Bilateral trade; Commercial policy; Trade barrier; Trade agreement; Political science; International economics; Business; Economics; European union; China; Law","score_opus":0.044393211809864656,"score_gpt":0.2554082881545303,"score_spread":0.21101507634466565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322208536","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008246883,0.11489715,0.000103903476,0.7472119,0.0017701611,0.0040738443,0.00007562921,0.00023760347,0.12338295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7711206,0.19295083,0.00006834797,0.01812079,0.0032303482,0.0002881378,0.00012562113,0.00011262132,0.013982712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978616,0.00008448867,0.0005223289,0.0003544396,0.0006561449,0.0005210013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981273,0.00022180543,0.0005016826,0.0011054474,0.000027014014,0.000016794904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019711328,0.00028850682,0.00035171304,0.000057759076,0.0005783242,0.0005359853,0.0013121574,0.00006076487,0.0001100891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039567432,0.00014829334,0.00022054126,0.0016638143,0.0001039144,0.0004624161,0.00015469661,0.00028882638,0.00040704152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009243059,0.000014986331,0.0011533819,0.0004239849,0.000018522625,0.000010604776,0.001064344,0.0000027694812,0.0000111599265,0.013350968,0.9442146,0.03972546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027188807,0.000006258342,0.05440963,0.00095907977,0.000081675564,0.0000040553373,0.00348317,0.00011943898,0.0000026712469,0.0039953766,0.9364557,0.0002110443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013630613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010600369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7628737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032550874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033769233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6047227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}