{"meta":{"query_hash":"af7198e10881","filters":{"venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly"},"cohort_total":56,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":56,"exported":56,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af7198e10881","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Philosophical+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1505598217","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.685_8.x","title":"Grounding Concepts: an Empirical Basis for Arithmetical Knowledge - C.S. Jenkins","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arithmetic function; Naturalism; Empiricism; Realism; Epistemology; Mental arithmetic; A priori and a posteriori; Analytic philosophy; Analogical reasoning; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Contemporary philosophy; Discrete mathematics; Analogy","score_opus":0.09857317016457481,"score_gpt":0.34247723168526517,"score_spread":0.24390406152069036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505598217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.581467,0.00017207122,0.0011242267,0.18526876,0.0074187536,0.0012157796,0.00026625564,0.0006433506,0.22242385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991483,8.7136397e-7,0.0003488055,0.0018362947,0.007297302,0.00009627246,0.000012472596,0.00003167331,0.0004614969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981955,0.0001155391,0.00037278107,0.0005009965,0.00031439436,0.0005007772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982857,0.0005878003,0.00008706468,0.00055950135,0.00017064142,0.0003092612],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072941964,0.00026335532,0.00030570506,0.00010571873,0.0016694916,0.00034699627,0.0008920959,0.00013317858,0.0011497469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104447055,0.00017990347,0.00022492722,0.000079051526,0.0030053712,0.00056283426,0.000032656917,0.0006980185,0.0002991753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005386808,0.00032271317,0.000010824958,0.000012744114,0.000015432766,0.000002402679,0.03178712,1.0445253e-7,0.0006491237,0.96089906,0.0006495633,0.005597028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037945737,0.0014148236,0.00016125252,0.000013842271,0.000052152416,0.000014532835,0.0011043735,0.0005728977,0.000022974438,0.8234403,0.17250103,0.00032234428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002909763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049913913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40844786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003987637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007747736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826353452","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.674.x","title":"HOW TO USE A CONCEPT YOU REJECT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Ascription; Principle of compositionality; Inference; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Cognition; Computer science; Philosophy of language; Normative; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.052176172333042725,"score_gpt":0.23318436125725658,"score_spread":0.18100818892421386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1826353452","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3321715,0.00003451913,0.00005836938,0.58574015,0.003146068,0.000511217,0.00010956253,0.000305553,0.07792308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876737,3.9779252e-7,0.00009692388,0.004459602,0.0033347544,0.000028941815,0.0000036802146,0.000019048744,0.0043829684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986672,0.00005856071,0.0001871148,0.000358815,0.00037215222,0.00035614893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988144,0.0001557969,0.000067637564,0.00062247785,0.000101001126,0.00023866037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023773305,0.00019940201,0.00020459767,0.00008314024,0.00089177245,0.00072456326,0.0007351945,0.00006391744,0.0005956015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008566818,0.00013016733,0.00012888298,0.00007497786,0.0014532129,0.0005462603,0.000033491226,0.0005668442,0.0004948861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027286997,0.000053058007,0.000003726247,0.0000024231338,0.000008956059,0.0000073898887,0.029689483,2.2976543e-7,0.0020753194,0.96401584,0.0020526133,0.002063684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017899835,0.000716167,0.00011349033,0.00000887955,0.000017928322,0.000011331913,0.0006037876,0.00002077514,0.000052114872,0.5267917,0.47123206,0.00025277535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117137686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004556345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6555022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001667835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029635907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.698698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971338664","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00004.x","title":"An Introduction to Philosophical Methods. By ChrisDaly. (Toronto: Broadview, 2010. Pp. 257. US$32.95.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Library science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.07592193641619185,"score_gpt":0.3191050254458789,"score_spread":0.24318308902968702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971338664","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079357736,0.010312462,0.0054593566,0.7699593,0.019600844,0.003636873,0.00042992752,0.0018259869,0.10941753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603691,0.00017146723,0.0027239663,0.0086591,0.02580586,0.00019390295,0.00010170185,0.00015272193,0.00182216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954038,0.0013750596,0.0008653113,0.0010198475,0.0005387216,0.00079725246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971398,0.00028169074,0.00026551096,0.0014266883,0.00035183303,0.0005344661],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019534077,0.00059317576,0.0007856745,0.000055565724,0.0008355208,0.00020674305,0.0011270948,0.00035295534,0.0035035664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109427136,0.00042894896,0.00035053556,0.000109155226,0.0014427303,0.0007779721,0.000070358656,0.0011528647,0.00078118534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026373874,0.00080701854,0.000010955551,0.0000452441,0.00017670037,0.0000058025566,0.04892595,9.06885e-7,0.0024632423,0.90685165,0.025660686,0.014788098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046530936,0.0026706823,0.00017308955,0.000018243742,0.00020594324,0.00001844473,0.0012464133,0.000071253955,0.00029204314,0.7523632,0.24184002,0.0006353417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002236865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007396166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88101137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009881109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004831659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979798094","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu086","title":"On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Democratic legitimacy; Ideal theory; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03758842339145689,"score_gpt":0.30199081675264644,"score_spread":0.26440239336118954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979798094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24700885,0.000012218089,0.0010291237,0.6270505,0.00007000839,0.0002334399,0.000012664202,0.00006121514,0.124521986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150807,0.0000073450688,0.000025635614,0.007830223,0.00048976566,0.00001570827,7.8811485e-7,0.000012571855,0.00010991611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971294,0.0014797542,0.0002651882,0.00023731864,0.0005105433,0.0003777886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311996,0.005986132,0.00009700422,0.00052674493,0.00007490677,0.0001952651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004088863,0.00014157343,0.00021691808,0.00003850912,0.00085845735,0.00007012438,0.0006135394,0.00015495605,0.00006753293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020349843,0.00007547508,0.00010477961,0.00017976589,0.0019606706,0.000118565506,0.00003998351,0.000558643,0.000017183504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060772487,0.000054813052,0.000012934955,0.0000067021497,0.000013462557,1.8866947e-7,0.012575297,0.000005560071,0.0000418174,0.98583204,0.00006155329,0.0013348609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013042497,0.00027021384,0.00020844128,0.000019442125,0.000025416957,8.934063e-7,0.00055617205,0.0016659178,0.000009416167,0.9968941,0.000114485796,0.00010505146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011427041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006447144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7444992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020701622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067750894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7224173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989911624","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00099.x","title":"The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. By A.W.Moore. (Cambridge UP, 2012. Pp. xxi + 668. Price £70.00 h/b.)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Common sense; Hegelianism; Humanity; Theology","score_opus":0.028934280135411976,"score_gpt":0.2397235360089836,"score_spread":0.21078925587357164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989911624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28474766,0.039127063,0.005696852,0.124522485,0.005744392,0.0027153532,0.0010886296,0.0006135836,0.53574395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625146,0.000029922187,0.00002414429,0.000386047,0.0024654127,0.000026231066,0.000014124307,0.000045463945,0.00075720885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740237,0.00033315088,0.0007224492,0.00028968317,0.0006576537,0.0005947141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773294,0.0006473769,0.0005067865,0.00076675933,0.00021197132,0.00013415595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007913115,0.00034132332,0.00048992585,0.000048887687,0.00069519767,0.000099983205,0.00054980564,0.00012122723,0.00010082911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049012535,0.00019631349,0.00040583397,0.00013002512,0.0012667613,0.0008000212,0.000083382816,0.0005641165,0.00009616681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018146163,0.00030312283,0.0000070467772,0.00005202887,0.000180648,7.6217356e-7,0.013415535,0.0000016594967,0.0014778678,0.97879076,0.0030210873,0.0025680375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043471286,0.00039324773,0.00009727664,0.00007418982,0.00019709622,0.000007244824,0.0009836035,0.0009870466,0.00028224947,0.975703,0.020531105,0.00030925323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011579799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011635407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7115038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000707535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003487123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8005431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024551125","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.659_11.x","title":"God, the Best, and Evil - Bruce Langtry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Theism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Determinism; Theodicy; Doctrine; Dialectic; Problem of evil; Philosophy of religion; Theology","score_opus":0.025379000939391525,"score_gpt":0.23241860920145027,"score_spread":0.20703960826205875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024551125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47355157,0.00042129596,0.0000033981528,0.39512724,0.0010193525,0.00022195606,0.000033114822,0.00009525558,0.12952682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903622,0.000007719473,0.000010915259,0.003737254,0.0046285493,0.000021917673,0.0000040682025,0.000018299583,0.0012090596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904376,0.0001275357,0.00019814551,0.00021807432,0.000157992,0.0002544742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988353,0.0004537739,0.000067522626,0.00050983415,0.000049365393,0.00008419864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038168166,0.00018358222,0.0001737033,0.00002709591,0.0008903405,0.00014537768,0.0004835746,0.00010215303,0.0014642301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000307699,0.000090786874,0.00009121413,0.000027404789,0.0018998369,0.00013433913,0.000039206963,0.00086588657,0.00062011054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037374863,0.00005159022,0.000038534054,0.000006827755,0.000033202865,0.000004465157,0.008398437,6.092419e-8,0.000161553,0.9873291,0.0006563481,0.0032824804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021536999,0.0002940301,0.0003136635,0.000009230107,0.00005410536,0.00004315113,0.0006283356,0.000019062709,0.000008163951,0.9260548,0.07221481,0.00014530781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009426802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042062814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51681066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000029416842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014714006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030804302","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00027.x","title":"Emotional Truth. By Ronaldde Sousa. (Oxford UP, 2011. Pp. xviii + 391. Price £38.00.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Renaissance and Early Modern Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Meaning (existential); Rationality; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06621202068372399,"score_gpt":0.2310850002675672,"score_spread":0.16487297958384323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030804302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20233305,0.0046074605,0.00045061792,0.047562566,0.0028553067,0.0007185848,0.00039823996,0.0005276992,0.74054646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99182373,0.00011421015,0.00003357178,0.00091913046,0.0023445033,0.00006072295,0.000032556618,0.00004658143,0.0046249917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979358,0.00010665445,0.00044901486,0.00043854758,0.00048998155,0.00058002747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889374,0.00016099327,0.0001563375,0.0004930293,0.00014346247,0.00015243537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025714084,0.0003626944,0.00037937533,0.000049476927,0.0009590362,0.00015687107,0.00057064666,0.000102350125,0.0065699155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013980425,0.00023626596,0.00023659958,0.000037676138,0.0009161566,0.0003812084,0.00005548557,0.00043777557,0.0020126363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018819285,0.0003066134,0.00006578257,0.000027733877,0.00023391395,0.000009079749,0.06363251,4.949101e-7,0.000055506312,0.8894769,0.04361251,0.0023907486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007927602,0.0010895611,0.0016733907,0.000043622516,0.00006920204,0.000016976657,0.0035695748,0.000066619505,0.00003119558,0.7916844,0.20038582,0.0005769008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022364766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004627609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7894907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027213335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002886234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053307472","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu076","title":"ONLY POWERS CAN CONFER DISPOSITIONS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Property (philosophy); Power (physics); Epistemology; Realism; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01701755659632519,"score_gpt":0.2829806154926726,"score_spread":0.2659630588963474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053307472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10776409,0.000023158535,0.0024742691,0.29368776,0.0007681641,0.00024179071,0.00004058279,0.00016711261,0.5948331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926272,4.4404e-7,0.000028789947,0.006155416,0.0008403093,0.000031840806,0.000008594907,0.0000183066,0.00028908366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981169,0.00041309616,0.0002638557,0.00040441254,0.00030077598,0.00050094875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838686,0.00046006602,0.00006152875,0.0007582873,0.000046074216,0.00028717183],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000503085,0.00019543835,0.00020663402,0.000046198078,0.00034042678,0.000059578528,0.0007058067,0.00012690942,0.0014563302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047215082,0.00012393486,0.00014179337,0.00025351116,0.001092376,0.00006512585,0.000029469786,0.0004301428,0.0018491901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052495936,0.00014787812,0.00003886749,0.0000016463482,0.000025201796,0.000007173529,0.0014318462,5.357426e-7,0.00016659511,0.9920079,0.00016229632,0.00595755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036994318,0.0007375246,0.005284422,0.000009462514,0.000032890133,0.00005137009,0.000099346355,0.00007719707,0.000009448513,0.99125326,0.0018811752,0.00019395765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006448719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020985583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88486314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022133288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022563303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053540791","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00040.x","title":"Forgiveness. By Eve Garrard and David McNaughton. (Acumen Publishing Ltd, 2010. Pp. xi + 132. Price £9.99.)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Christian Theology and Mission","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Publishing; Alice (programming language); Theology; History; Classics; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.03099432678517387,"score_gpt":0.23499726235040688,"score_spread":0.20400293556523302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053540791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4658572,0.017481452,0.0002816068,0.3235852,0.0034626008,0.0010847033,0.00029825143,0.00053752604,0.18741146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900886,0.00005452407,0.000018632034,0.0020211604,0.0026602657,0.00003209855,0.00006517722,0.00003638265,0.005023184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982707,0.00022441875,0.00033788118,0.00031476765,0.00026008784,0.0005921595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871135,0.0003398419,0.00015179727,0.00042480114,0.00008510575,0.00028708845],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007678998,0.00028413744,0.00030601092,0.000050161554,0.00078373856,0.00045004208,0.00044775542,0.00018859291,0.0017224594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007403848,0.00018582385,0.000100623394,0.000050882674,0.00066718936,0.0014156508,0.00008763306,0.00061698107,0.00026501235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017912292,0.00022620687,0.00021125251,0.000049126505,0.00009704679,0.000005850484,0.049456924,9.9130276e-8,0.00053625717,0.81524026,0.12956278,0.004435078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008424372,0.00033890043,0.00063367357,0.000062274434,0.000107228596,0.0000488984,0.0020706877,0.000028018814,0.00008934486,0.48294324,0.5123962,0.00043908853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013835797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021009371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5242314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031984506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024106535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060574362","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.581_6.x","title":"The One and the Many: Reading Isaiah Berlin - George Crowder and Henry Hardy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Thomas Hardy Literature Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Reading (process); Classics; Philosophy; History; Art; Art history; Linguistics","score_opus":0.028440154259749682,"score_gpt":0.21713304845973,"score_spread":0.1886928941999803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060574362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19887358,0.012065978,0.000021550253,0.64206684,0.0009129273,0.0010883946,0.000080393766,0.00024008832,0.14465027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99176073,0.00024934518,0.000016976817,0.0016892209,0.0022785906,0.00005449119,0.0000032097396,0.00002905309,0.0039183884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847496,0.00026560138,0.0003208015,0.0002878641,0.00028666327,0.0003641207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837106,0.00091405434,0.00009586834,0.00046132933,0.00008184524,0.000075843855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005886248,0.0002519654,0.00031903922,0.000030646555,0.0033913378,0.0004526123,0.00031110432,0.000058888014,0.0000692098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053641263,0.00010893704,0.00009920724,0.000041653202,0.0036307946,0.00017818231,0.000090584945,0.0005000911,0.000048707843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016447809,0.000025753698,0.000026852882,0.000010840379,0.00012097731,0.000008967514,0.080712505,4.3089734e-8,0.000018910861,0.917634,0.00079521735,0.0004814557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012179038,0.00025465002,0.0013544871,0.000043314954,0.00011927166,0.000084697334,0.0033151575,0.000052227624,0.0000060876982,0.697992,0.2953055,0.0002547073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003960856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010413292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79288715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011760113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001129423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065056736","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv014","title":"Moral Deference and Deference to an Epistemic Peer","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Morality; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24432780029377044,"score_gpt":0.31490333800443804,"score_spread":0.0705755377106676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065056736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8249231,0.00017332273,0.0001333824,0.12856796,0.00068009336,0.00031376525,0.000053992884,0.00014329924,0.04501105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943308,0.0000024262947,0.000107626125,0.0026523287,0.0013627011,0.000027431968,0.000012910044,0.000021441308,0.0014822826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984503,0.0002504547,0.00026656664,0.0003391513,0.0003706106,0.00032295362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985686,0.00016671028,0.00006812686,0.00048312102,0.0003478171,0.0003656481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007145525,0.00020839072,0.00027450235,0.000048237365,0.00029497387,0.00021385985,0.00041435557,0.00009215759,0.00006164575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008840524,0.00013967685,0.00005838907,0.0000423965,0.0008064244,0.00023557717,0.000044097553,0.00043431876,0.00032828766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049680337,0.00005706258,0.00010988862,0.000011884905,0.000014973861,0.0000044446338,0.070434384,0.0000012484807,0.000033719298,0.92664737,0.00041218568,0.002223173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002659814,0.0012223179,0.0002943193,0.000019371142,0.000038806003,0.000014634473,0.0045457077,0.0000716644,0.000008095673,0.9855041,0.007786875,0.00022815686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029901776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007415824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16940773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020889125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055524706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5695856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088029763","doi":"10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00390.x","title":"BUDD AND BRADY ON THE AESTHETICS OF NATURE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Natural (archaeology); Art; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01245659355721366,"score_gpt":0.22612503485604915,"score_spread":0.2136684412988355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088029763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7280471,0.000053874202,0.00001898334,0.2611612,0.000055981134,0.00018153139,0.000010621375,0.000017522387,0.010453204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943149,0.000022640146,0.00005794985,0.005459226,0.00009838577,0.000008190509,0.0000015495021,0.000014512148,0.0000226594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988537,0.00009200133,0.00018861998,0.00023650358,0.00043250163,0.00019669748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915993,0.0002010026,0.000073029165,0.00048420613,0.0000029093267,0.000078940226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003308155,0.00016045119,0.00013058513,0.000011442688,0.0002348524,0.000017840508,0.00041604345,0.00018114413,0.00017748603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022192435,0.00008338539,0.000068650545,0.00012021223,0.0013625866,0.00007092495,0.00007804982,0.0008449673,0.00021038901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008036528,0.00030258833,0.0003725811,0.000008520872,0.00001996879,0.0000093193985,0.0024644847,0.00040270886,0.0034549497,0.99039245,0.0001173661,0.0023746795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002660097,0.00075120316,0.0070959935,0.00001957931,0.000017157317,0.000019919333,0.00009044056,0.000025883099,0.00081673963,0.99034226,0.0004355699,0.0001192322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034482953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000097327875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2662678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038620303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040530467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5020507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092335477","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.520.x","title":"DESIRING THE BAD UNDER THE GUISE OF THE GOOD","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Content (measure theory); Mental state; Element (criminal law); Epistemology; Psychology; State (computer science); Aesthetics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05312159902442484,"score_gpt":0.26175964524513423,"score_spread":0.2086380462207094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092335477","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19126798,0.00048307804,0.00022211671,0.60103303,0.0011204476,0.00067469676,0.000033418535,0.00008896667,0.20507629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883067,0.000007492345,0.0000036744586,0.008546988,0.0027375342,0.00001727404,0.0000012991538,0.000034405602,0.0003446118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976144,0.000437108,0.00054836186,0.0002540799,0.00067900616,0.00046706796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621475,0.0020648886,0.00022661411,0.001241746,0.00016556947,0.00008645472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027923642,0.00026292322,0.000247689,0.000034902772,0.001593141,0.00016349403,0.0017354719,0.00012182138,0.0003304363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008851013,0.00009213226,0.00036269776,0.00013918147,0.0032636214,0.000097533935,0.00014967402,0.0012286381,0.00010709121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057427038,0.00008596923,0.000006744364,0.000009754441,0.00007388344,0.000001971898,0.012729854,0.0000075021935,0.00015358055,0.9855238,0.000057639743,0.0012918734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024582347,0.00017699889,0.00078985316,0.00004071815,0.000085689855,0.000009961015,0.0022348303,0.000060141516,0.00010580563,0.98830533,0.007792592,0.00015227983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012570524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038368552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79703873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028077226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051859457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125824432","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.503.x","title":"MULGAN'S FUTURE PEOPLE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Morality; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02375246985948648,"score_gpt":0.24439729856487882,"score_spread":0.22064482870539234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125824432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14872578,0.00035078678,0.00031719747,0.47569674,0.002705895,0.0004032223,0.000045944136,0.00039473036,0.3713597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97906804,0.0000074697036,0.000017783083,0.0058092633,0.01469275,0.000011849975,0.000011470475,0.000039640825,0.0003417129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814165,0.0001126161,0.0004071683,0.00032247495,0.00047862978,0.0005374895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984502,0.0004956636,0.00010201852,0.000586149,0.0001445432,0.0002214018],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012776756,0.00026379872,0.0002749162,0.00008312955,0.00077466544,0.00017575898,0.00060808606,0.00015908128,0.0015080156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003274024,0.00016167677,0.00021929399,0.00009873246,0.0007352417,0.00017221297,0.00004267559,0.00094581593,0.00090952887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084785286,0.000111269044,0.00000486798,0.000011820903,0.00003376343,0.00001712026,0.022417365,2.4679835e-7,0.000054129243,0.97148997,0.00013447495,0.0056402115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002989766,0.0003396054,0.00023188359,0.000011448657,0.000029705177,0.000012705083,0.0019695049,0.000025836032,0.000014135777,0.9389998,0.05782525,0.00024116863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007401594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008013473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8303423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002688198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027051477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142934754","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu033","title":"Counter Closure and Knowledge Despite Falsehood","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Prima facie; Epistemology; Denial; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.045700079642187946,"score_gpt":0.2577492157369722,"score_spread":0.21204913609478424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142934754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6124309,0.0011170026,0.00030657364,0.11165909,0.0018784078,0.00043660047,0.000053549156,0.00025964587,0.27185827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99262595,0.000009893536,0.000016055586,0.00233222,0.0034991826,0.00001766436,0.0000061458722,0.000025677746,0.0014672269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987598,0.0002964978,0.00025453602,0.00026048048,0.0001533046,0.000275352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989081,0.0004145188,0.00007678107,0.0003786203,0.0001220698,0.00009993147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006511919,0.00019773522,0.00027378663,0.000039063438,0.00045252746,0.00015548048,0.0002547023,0.00010593486,0.00012941353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031981814,0.00012489893,0.00011028103,0.000025858653,0.0011186065,0.00012845318,0.000029214685,0.00045546942,0.0003601755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019359122,0.000073161995,0.000061566636,0.00003743287,0.00004055292,0.0000011301951,0.037815835,9.403581e-8,0.00003685263,0.95732456,0.0005729903,0.0040164865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038695103,0.00062729296,0.00035010694,0.000026422926,0.00006665778,0.000007701889,0.0007625914,0.00009305203,0.0000078035955,0.86951,0.12796956,0.00019183713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038299175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033053666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38019508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000091912425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019126117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50932306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150056758","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00082.x","title":"The Ought-Is Gap: Trouble For Hybrid Semantics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expressivism; Epistemology; Normative; Semantics (computer science); Ontology; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11911483433510818,"score_gpt":0.30034796166571776,"score_spread":0.1812331273306096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150056758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102830194,0.0028020937,0.0013228616,0.7915099,0.008045084,0.0017363841,0.0003180485,0.00032488536,0.09111051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831151,0.000026290068,0.000047721987,0.0039681406,0.008395099,0.00008608622,0.000013287557,0.000036888305,0.0043114005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984498,0.00015490189,0.00033813235,0.00019064754,0.00025621994,0.00061027857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799365,0.001012389,0.0001348634,0.00057808764,0.00015799404,0.00012299762],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009773086,0.00021258357,0.00025582797,0.000022544202,0.0014065732,0.00020332458,0.0004820104,0.00007033662,0.00009583544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046967238,0.00011187712,0.00026955563,0.00002552183,0.0009854325,0.00021202464,0.000026192023,0.00042576794,0.00030618283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045709196,0.00009913672,0.000011398108,0.000026866266,0.00008111845,5.20217e-7,0.024140308,1.2475682e-7,0.000023450539,0.9660644,0.007518028,0.0019889395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024977708,0.00027229745,0.000015461635,0.000008087603,0.00008427524,0.000005114779,0.0013142849,0.00006350139,0.000067558176,0.67602277,0.32175827,0.00013862636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034414647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006545899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8802849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018052597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026567095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323964502","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv001","title":"Aristotle's Teaching in the Politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Politics; Classics; Art history; Art; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.11581874193964115,"score_gpt":0.3701955205711614,"score_spread":0.25437677863152025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323964502","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04895983,0.00007012144,0.000063874235,0.60179335,0.0002687488,0.00020118908,0.0000065295058,0.00006518577,0.34857118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98593014,0.000002335456,0.000042879332,0.011165343,0.0027322723,0.00001699572,0.0000024946069,0.000011069319,0.00009648771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962345,0.0018265027,0.00028145334,0.00019634228,0.00083851896,0.0006226939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978453,0.001332893,0.00004915139,0.00043591697,0.00004889107,0.00028786765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004758988,0.00013656328,0.00016461157,0.000048235786,0.00081695995,0.00013944939,0.0010104112,0.00019238955,0.00001449915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010203675,0.00007791117,0.00009163438,0.00022567871,0.0011778867,0.00017306716,0.000028253075,0.0013804607,0.00020235419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008187261,0.00008926399,0.000057095425,0.0000021631745,0.000004033784,0.000012156549,0.07183167,0.0000015385878,0.0000013149473,0.9272642,0.0003262168,0.00040214282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019860166,0.00016571436,0.0002797994,0.000010832928,0.000013052467,0.000005172477,0.01027271,0.000039020957,3.9810428e-7,0.9667139,0.022184143,0.00011665275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022181093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005334056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012272436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019185254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6283478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2386396958","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv113","title":"Wittgenstein and Heidegger","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Intelligibility (philosophy); Metaphysics","score_opus":0.0826653683557193,"score_gpt":0.240398759592291,"score_spread":0.1577333912365717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2386396958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2580119,0.0004993377,0.00004770863,0.3563871,0.00042415,0.0004843945,0.00004955229,0.0002651538,0.3838307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943785,0.000002380517,0.000040846517,0.0019799625,0.0023654166,0.00004684965,0.000006495022,0.000020509498,0.0011590461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903166,0.00007055882,0.00022487204,0.00023306318,0.0002195955,0.0002202427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999177,0.00008434247,0.000058617785,0.00038102412,0.00009450871,0.00020455036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022120377,0.00016250313,0.00016281522,0.00003645126,0.000359632,0.00018445811,0.00023709254,0.000044776323,0.00015600123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013786822,0.00010299081,0.000057121855,0.00004653357,0.00072936603,0.00017409131,0.00002878363,0.00020975183,0.0006221235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002048704,0.000045646524,0.000006293481,0.0000040056207,0.000019778045,0.0000032512928,0.018146954,4.4264456e-7,0.000032962103,0.97727656,0.0016146894,0.0028289158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033379166,0.00032500704,0.000042374762,0.00000788343,0.000027620734,0.00001851126,0.0014731806,0.000059704245,0.000011070347,0.9085796,0.0889609,0.00016036467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043356373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032143285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73636657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012181782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023682767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79963464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461673724","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqw046","title":"Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Luck; Sophistication; Normative; Sociology; Theme (computing); Law and economics; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Philosophy; Social science; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06931681673672753,"score_gpt":0.38181295744562166,"score_spread":0.31249614070889414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461673724","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04501984,0.00003388242,0.0021383457,0.885035,0.00028020694,0.00030931545,0.00010579095,0.00010613245,0.06697152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916357,0.000023821902,0.00002520149,0.006667296,0.0014516698,0.00002222106,0.0000010010102,0.00000995408,0.00016314308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829173,0.0003301624,0.00018586243,0.00028064044,0.00039903997,0.0005125575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759364,0.0015121992,0.0000377336,0.0002699379,0.00009199002,0.0004944919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071729475,0.00013262313,0.00015867634,0.000032615088,0.0007490351,0.00013174949,0.0006053344,0.00013258363,0.000094099014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007713412,0.000071614086,0.00005387292,0.0002051323,0.001148263,0.00037574527,0.00008294645,0.00023791818,0.00028137778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046215668,0.000029980274,0.000049756938,0.000007431084,0.000008909641,0.0000058351093,0.0032059317,3.8976363e-8,0.00010753634,0.98917645,0.00019964167,0.0071622944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019053971,0.00020932994,0.001595585,0.000032088068,0.000052975924,0.0000017725513,0.000513924,0.0000013409152,0.000027979379,0.98958576,0.007638145,0.00015056274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011779547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008807262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9466159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006482442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006511606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5761048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561345718","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqw005","title":"The Philosophy of Design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Beauty; Philosophy of design; Architecture; Ontology; Sociology; Point (geometry); Designtheory; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Computer science; Mathematics; Western philosophy; Human–computer interaction; Art; Artificial intelligence; Visual arts","score_opus":0.03689493187008294,"score_gpt":0.2534597891875305,"score_spread":0.21656485731744754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561345718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016635148,0.0014749207,0.1522714,0.74415547,0.0025408727,0.000977628,0.000023022141,0.0006848664,0.081236675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894613,0.00006280551,0.00017085134,0.00020271186,0.00043152657,0.000028330807,2.796451e-7,0.00002141419,0.00013593503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991186,0.0001779815,0.00023434476,0.00009475461,0.00018752956,0.00018677603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759555,0.0017896208,0.000048215577,0.00045491723,0.000047756355,0.00006391987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005358446,0.000111488494,0.000104604296,0.000024972307,0.00012146253,0.000025020294,0.0003934691,0.000050515268,0.00009109088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007598083,0.000046645593,0.00006180612,0.00013518204,0.00019102124,0.00012457451,0.0000065967656,0.0001383025,0.00039347514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015668366,0.00008553579,0.000013110134,0.000024633153,0.00014881429,0.000002605842,0.0013409037,0.0000812837,0.020998847,0.8105927,0.0068203663,0.15973452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025832787,0.00022236917,0.0002485293,0.000024337922,0.000024421393,0.000011951711,0.000043732995,0.00039286597,0.0014189453,0.9847631,0.012464044,0.00012741184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013763107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.7285513e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.982311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018479948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018883564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5057458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582900989","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqw088","title":"The Fall and Hypertime","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Literal (mathematical logic); Doctrine; Philosophy; Fall of man; Original sin; Paleoanthropology; Epistemology; Evolutionary theory; History; Law; Theology; Linguistics; Archaeology; Political science","score_opus":0.01442560234657719,"score_gpt":0.2356995691440028,"score_spread":0.22127396679742561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582900989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6731506,0.00005214589,0.0003900395,0.31799105,0.00020772911,0.00013362449,0.000008237129,0.000026122136,0.008040446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983696,0.0000025894387,0.000008018224,0.00022031154,0.0009772045,0.00001327535,3.544729e-7,0.0000057404027,0.0004029592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932235,0.00005712964,0.00011687411,0.00014643399,0.00013175848,0.00022547666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999336,0.00027269934,0.000034170564,0.00026044226,0.000015859368,0.00008084864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002286688,0.00008752611,0.00007814183,0.000008122553,0.0003404616,0.00009243863,0.0002629356,0.000019129207,0.00005010045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000066199377,0.000029909308,0.000047514302,0.00005792607,0.00033194912,0.00010276214,0.00002042603,0.00008001214,0.00027506182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059316168,0.000031575757,0.0028334842,6.0687256e-7,0.000031309108,8.628069e-7,0.0004016057,1.8106518e-7,0.0046173204,0.8126629,0.00087492616,0.1784859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003381532,0.00018257131,0.0024824983,0.000008813388,0.0000110105375,0.0000015850845,0.00016076551,0.0000385623,0.00016676912,0.9905135,0.0059991404,0.00009662261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007129382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057975667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32521895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000037387574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001658168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3535455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604204779","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqx019","title":"Socrates and Self-Knowledge","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; SOCRATES; Self-knowledge; Socratic method; Philosophy; Epistemology; Constitution; Introspection; Key (lock); Computer science; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.046489371775394445,"score_gpt":0.26724597122579885,"score_spread":0.2207565994504044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604204779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13147633,0.00033028846,0.000005255836,0.23048562,0.0007505001,0.00022635059,0.000028735389,0.00021619063,0.63648075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345815,0.000012140619,0.000012188599,0.00052805623,0.004586279,0.000018589164,0.000002205508,0.000020028134,0.0013623423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991054,0.00006746496,0.00019022431,0.00025047126,0.00013572643,0.00025073555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889356,0.00017452412,0.00010238427,0.0006485461,0.000059174068,0.00012179949],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019034691,0.00018436488,0.00020553998,0.000025980868,0.0022879273,0.0007178653,0.00053087086,0.000057746205,0.00025969135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028533424,0.000110672634,0.000097412856,0.000010336259,0.0011894052,0.0002312504,0.00007702528,0.00029236326,0.00050415477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016351309,0.0001251805,0.00001615747,0.000014453474,0.00004010431,0.000005501562,0.010351845,1.3863218e-8,0.000016095133,0.98288316,0.00066055136,0.005870611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031398467,0.0002858241,0.00063732656,0.000016661092,0.000045875717,0.0000054719385,0.00015933612,0.00011666994,0.000009886764,0.9527897,0.04544647,0.00017274845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023295068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008629392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86198187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000103858765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000138121795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749192079","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqx045","title":"The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life's Biggest Questions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Pessimism; Pleasure; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04575332984713758,"score_gpt":0.3141277224600933,"score_spread":0.2683743926129557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749192079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02659058,0.00014918705,0.000035333152,0.7399973,0.0007981812,0.00046714055,0.00009660866,0.00014694018,0.23171872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863638,0.000020085228,0.000007249517,0.005694994,0.005747273,0.00015621814,0.000007201985,0.000042508964,0.0019606357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977101,0.00024011963,0.00052592356,0.00039547725,0.00057190354,0.0005564576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671113,0.000522594,0.00023219231,0.0018707842,0.00020251273,0.00046076826],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012733313,0.00029599667,0.0002845069,0.00005591892,0.009985196,0.00166141,0.002097433,0.00011830931,0.00037534194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052702444,0.00015888266,0.00020537803,0.000032606786,0.0026076597,0.00021273724,0.00019518108,0.0008585576,0.00068062544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036607853,0.000088566005,0.00000620028,0.000006986793,0.000070293085,0.000008257415,0.0053701764,9.950278e-7,0.00006240802,0.9900822,0.0025459977,0.0017212986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029757354,0.0004375852,0.00031553506,0.000050838604,0.000046558645,0.0000035658352,0.0003122458,0.000037198817,0.000004865823,0.8075729,0.19071355,0.00020758116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010472403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019308636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95977324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044576696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000905071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910550699","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqy060","title":"The Functions of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Jurisprudence; Function (biology); Positivism; Natural order; Comparative law; Private law; Scientific law; Positive law; Sociology; Black letter law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03335237354130844,"score_gpt":0.30559520641080123,"score_spread":0.2722428328694928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910550699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023185117,0.0001856404,0.00005523297,0.39118528,0.00074807915,0.0001979483,0.000008967742,0.00007507009,0.58435863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948683,0.000018338129,0.000013708325,0.001132992,0.0021589452,0.00001016155,6.6500417e-7,0.000004238825,0.0017926622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990755,0.00020403347,0.00013105973,0.00009318412,0.00029942053,0.00019680135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992456,0.000256038,0.00005229125,0.00025686595,0.00013363558,0.000055593275],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005968252,0.000056460845,0.000070490416,0.0000012603412,0.0024537803,0.000052475367,0.00042587987,0.000086987304,0.0001627651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003458151,0.000026979034,0.00010380811,0.00015621542,0.003566491,0.000071378105,0.000012629934,0.0001682582,0.00022340828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009961177,0.000020561145,0.0000050196763,7.49376e-7,0.00001591831,1.09074186e-7,0.02433911,5.5096034e-8,0.0000639699,0.97159857,0.0025714964,0.0013744752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005724882,0.0001467498,0.00005906571,0.000003358356,0.000013356834,4.225636e-7,0.0044172346,0.0000029113626,0.000016143067,0.72310984,0.2721359,0.00003774064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003123233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011459433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97168314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014622032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003361184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910931407","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqy069","title":"Knowledge and Truth in Plato: Stepping Past the Shadow of Socrates","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Object (grammar); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Shadow (psychology); SOCRATES; GRASP; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.043877356039219884,"score_gpt":0.25860106007849365,"score_spread":0.21472370403927377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910931407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6718092,0.00067474466,0.000012485755,0.085149504,0.0006726342,0.00040497683,0.00004819859,0.000070141876,0.24115811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958143,0.000004438436,0.000004188512,0.00038870084,0.003603428,0.00001590012,0.0000022751608,0.000016508278,0.00015024666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887526,0.00015398786,0.0003459231,0.000222068,0.00015488958,0.00024786327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988212,0.00063537713,0.00009264948,0.00031413493,0.00007751415,0.000059148195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003299458,0.00017339853,0.0002523531,0.000056786794,0.0003870201,0.00009084419,0.00032703514,0.00005914247,0.00019998544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026901957,0.000089305184,0.000082266735,0.00009261688,0.001981523,0.000107812884,0.00005132428,0.00031912688,0.000093527524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006544473,0.0000912535,0.00005399623,0.000019652822,0.000025803625,0.0000015730843,0.026875691,1.2028161e-7,0.000049671646,0.9691531,0.0001735862,0.0034901137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041277686,0.0005981966,0.0010337556,0.00006824032,0.00002632066,0.0000037310524,0.0011808284,0.00029830745,0.000029912093,0.9931021,0.0031105923,0.00013526886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004795232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004018392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3240051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011822853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016734668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7301004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012377090","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa007","title":"Epistemic Judgement and Motivation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Judgement; Epistemology; Doxastic logic; Expressivism; Normative; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12314749931926806,"score_gpt":0.252096904582415,"score_spread":0.12894940526314697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012377090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28435504,0.00021165842,0.0002233477,0.6854607,0.0003819748,0.00029389767,0.00002116288,0.00012891764,0.028923327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890546,0.00000869047,0.0000152073035,0.008660958,0.0020054153,0.0000130074095,0.000008137485,0.000013313952,0.0002206482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991626,0.0001155238,0.00021300618,0.00019906748,0.00015418963,0.00015561737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994222,0.00019473338,0.00007014502,0.00016486355,0.000059646478,0.00008841911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019112232,0.00012137292,0.00016648341,0.000015770973,0.00027868553,0.00008438481,0.0001546646,0.000046224628,0.00014658629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039708593,0.000080453756,0.000059210044,0.000024779092,0.0005731351,0.00010511047,0.000020561845,0.00028373508,0.00014939136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020916412,0.000025041007,0.000046278623,0.000036412435,0.00002875029,0.0000016487104,0.048343346,5.7106e-7,0.00019279242,0.94913054,0.00033117182,0.0018425093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031937336,0.00060830906,0.00045193676,0.0000144492105,0.000049071892,0.0000022335862,0.002443076,0.00020251353,0.000022605507,0.97799546,0.017741408,0.000149561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025499963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016813376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7046996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000064273877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010845187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3280809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112341774","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa079","title":"Avicenna on the Ontology of Pure Quiddity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09253165000198514,"score_gpt":0.2411898041389779,"score_spread":0.14865815413699274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112341774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10775517,0.00005436421,0.000009405721,0.77693677,0.00030219008,0.0002459465,0.000052702297,0.00006475155,0.11457869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727077,0.000002236135,0.0000017651745,0.023410594,0.0036980961,0.000020393392,0.000005162148,0.000015268664,0.0001387834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857825,0.00023389753,0.00033401407,0.00024092723,0.00037020838,0.0002426765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875236,0.0005202824,0.00012212922,0.0003854263,0.000079328885,0.00014050344],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019385612,0.00018895029,0.00029368704,0.000016648406,0.00030219828,0.000043035518,0.00063712796,0.00006803313,0.0027538952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008483535,0.000085055726,0.00019649029,0.00005661916,0.00095637207,0.0000574554,0.000033542892,0.0005466523,0.0008068388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016453573,0.000110012166,0.0000025179563,0.000019428373,0.000043371303,0.000004377531,0.017072754,4.407774e-7,0.00013532072,0.9778389,0.003518563,0.0010898017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002614541,0.0019770348,0.000059676237,0.000018816821,0.00004798703,0.0000015046071,0.0010451982,0.00016047954,0.000046753587,0.95836085,0.0378829,0.00013732133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022393098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051993437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86495256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008693833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018324634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114594491","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa078","title":"Against ‘Good for’/‘Well-Being’, for ‘Simply Good’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Value (mathematics); Form of the Good; Naturalism; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.056050156438669715,"score_gpt":0.26181518939233955,"score_spread":0.20576503295366982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114594491","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011509708,0.00010571111,0.002002522,0.7838937,0.000767673,0.0015939425,0.00034800213,0.0003505553,0.19942819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464045,0.0000090866,0.00008280256,0.044002928,0.008862431,0.0002651689,0.000073590054,0.00008427251,0.0002152019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978025,0.00012446003,0.0005653379,0.0005466911,0.00035660606,0.0006043987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759585,0.0011935759,0.00016492295,0.0004640739,0.00024239006,0.00033916289],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060685066,0.0003760486,0.0004734655,0.00004744805,0.0009497206,0.00029152192,0.00079674635,0.00018384327,0.00024202248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016061126,0.0002589176,0.0005097949,0.0000696629,0.000710297,0.00018817086,0.00005189578,0.00062216143,0.00027938647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002992356,0.00010774061,0.0000011638085,0.000100962534,0.000104987135,0.0000030998779,0.016741442,0.0000033252154,0.00016189176,0.9790256,0.00070634804,0.00274421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009919411,0.0016010319,0.0000025982672,0.00002396875,0.00008133515,0.000001300228,0.0004941537,0.0012673053,0.000043613076,0.8290259,0.16613713,0.00032971954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011414011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023648938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023473405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056509805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198426879","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqab047","title":"Practical Structure and Moral Skill","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Moral disengagement; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12465736986139654,"score_gpt":0.3208106594756913,"score_spread":0.1961532896142948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198426879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61777806,0.000023989103,0.00005613997,0.38003498,0.00022534291,0.0000576733,0.000016714614,0.00003220449,0.0017748991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876364,0.000008450309,0.00030093238,0.011536382,0.00037535702,0.0000035413766,0.000002837273,0.00000794949,0.00012817103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988404,0.00020639435,0.00013979284,0.0003506829,0.00024775372,0.00021498727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993217,0.0002569694,0.000034971425,0.00024671937,0.000024343364,0.00011527782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007812291,0.00011442552,0.00012199406,0.00001589614,0.00018570539,0.000048297214,0.00013427946,0.0000789853,0.00025753074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012684008,0.000072126335,0.00004531373,0.00011128236,0.00034372852,0.0001084471,0.000038458176,0.0003672461,0.00011108277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009724211,0.0002475919,0.00015604711,0.00000946408,0.000013208875,0.00042554186,0.0005119835,0.0000018428722,0.088166766,0.90446776,0.0015508779,0.0043516853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036571745,0.0002673784,0.0071600024,0.000007135353,0.000015302263,0.0012332296,0.000041610667,0.00012223239,0.0065636607,0.98349893,0.0006029006,0.00012189034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000016790325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016417143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36985832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008927258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022977738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29412264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213619021","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqab058","title":"Between Deflationism and Inflationism: A Moderate View on Truth and Reference","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Skepticism; Variety (cybernetics); Contrast (vision); Order (exchange); Reductionism; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Linguistics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05948249579671331,"score_gpt":0.31985352538190714,"score_spread":0.2603710295851938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213619021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.685506,0.00039294088,0.0006922849,0.108836256,0.00016862479,0.00021184949,0.000034244113,0.0000779529,0.20407988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818504,0.000013446032,0.00006906251,0.0013223442,0.00030393002,0.000019917476,0.000008745721,0.000010401833,0.000067130764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985075,0.00033757833,0.00024579017,0.00043880462,0.00021389652,0.00025643027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857634,0.00075560913,0.000058758334,0.00038113777,0.000050739367,0.00017743236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034477262,0.00015810234,0.00021523089,0.000029220806,0.0003597494,0.00011977945,0.00016071825,0.00012596948,0.00017449963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005775462,0.000108428714,0.000033434255,0.00018414357,0.0005391905,0.00010088656,0.000037652964,0.0003621141,0.00017037905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045826815,0.000034659948,0.00008932228,0.000004988588,0.00002148747,0.000013217228,0.000944706,9.247261e-7,0.000051923886,0.982124,0.0000035808841,0.016665364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003742583,0.00035784073,0.021946615,0.000022697295,0.000031470547,0.000031717886,0.00004519326,0.00015408885,0.000033805107,0.9766985,0.00016249421,0.00014129815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007856542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017383782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31267905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010057395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019368232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44215944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215183218","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqab054","title":"Mapping the Visual Icon","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Iconicity; Icon; Perception; Cognitive science; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09512493333080047,"score_gpt":0.35742491383681047,"score_spread":0.26229998050601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215183218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6822725,0.00011289324,0.001623687,0.23573999,0.0011711121,0.00022667463,0.0000075037437,0.000119820346,0.078725845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896326,0.0000032529508,0.000023130593,0.006235027,0.0011062347,0.000034342822,0.0000142392355,0.000014420941,0.0029367276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986516,0.0004666099,0.00024049099,0.00024303104,0.00018546732,0.0002127649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991723,0.00018188843,0.000052748204,0.00045859267,0.000077109624,0.000057405134],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024912722,0.00012085424,0.000121413046,0.000027476803,0.00025113265,0.00006690243,0.00020728416,0.00009990342,0.009070865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027980803,0.00006457345,0.00012030872,0.00018548434,0.00016029536,0.000050839353,0.000013719784,0.00039781432,0.004400377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010935088,0.000426449,0.00018370335,0.000007847369,0.00013635201,0.000058559162,0.04007306,0.0000017360758,0.03268618,0.7913964,0.00920166,0.1257187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030971507,0.0015816024,0.22298765,0.00008410872,0.00012044599,0.0007678589,0.053401608,0.004908506,0.00059989886,0.6061722,0.1052489,0.00103004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002646972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018619874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30736014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018907678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001651661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249685392","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv129","title":"Wittgenstein and Heidegger","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Intelligibility (philosophy); Proposition","score_opus":0.029920841909729216,"score_gpt":0.21226436183350936,"score_spread":0.18234351992378015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249685392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23628318,0.00020334232,0.00011422479,0.6157616,0.000258592,0.00038328828,0.00008145054,0.00022212406,0.1466922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941883,0.000008600957,0.000020653157,0.0015377552,0.0020296087,0.00005356303,0.000001655007,0.000020784182,0.0021390629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990555,0.00005981081,0.00022594587,0.00025730158,0.00016496982,0.00023646404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991636,0.00020596801,0.00006001024,0.00040633776,0.00005419974,0.00010987998],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013890774,0.00016217063,0.00015116093,0.00003536804,0.00046196085,0.000108507105,0.000234836,0.000043177966,0.0006948972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010710247,0.00007591795,0.000070120346,0.00003305851,0.0009495275,0.00018438669,0.00002551001,0.000115668554,0.00080115977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016314729,0.000033454315,0.000007898644,0.0000038568896,0.000021673115,0.000002109058,0.0041199713,1.5209856e-8,0.0007845101,0.9767067,0.0005518804,0.017751645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032502797,0.00023361307,0.00014987466,0.000022737706,0.000023478598,0.000012703813,0.00021897395,0.000004239833,0.00005849507,0.92602557,0.07276164,0.0001636729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014110976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002304839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7579051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009979541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010791217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249709255","doi":"10.1111/1467-9213.00303","title":"Book Reviews","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038221148472681245,"score_gpt":0.31640682278649024,"score_spread":0.278185674313809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249709255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017682083,0.010089604,0.00086362584,0.08915551,0.00083721493,0.00046411346,0.0000048666243,0.00010742101,0.89670944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97881174,0.00003731732,0.00005068762,0.018932804,0.00045807878,0.000085626285,0.000001011487,0.000015241332,0.0016075035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777883,0.00077743334,0.00035296724,0.00038578475,0.00023509686,0.0004699059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985788,0.00027614742,0.00008038019,0.0008293285,0.000023521236,0.00021186257],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00106976,0.00019078146,0.00025379306,0.000031085132,0.00022910554,0.000034720357,0.00058382563,0.00010954737,0.009081334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010922391,0.000108836626,0.00017051956,0.00029272705,0.0006591624,0.00009816578,0.000013500696,0.00040585423,0.00914447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021522348,0.00011027028,0.0000043376217,0.0000026374091,0.000011425841,0.000011664829,0.00073388463,6.4423745e-8,0.00007734575,0.98991644,0.005448991,0.003661389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019295781,0.00030186956,0.00011104989,0.0000083859195,0.000016252534,0.000043181626,0.000024590423,0.0000025963077,0.000017410375,0.77641374,0.22273774,0.000130197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041345565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.4489255e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016597498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012410147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294714117","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqac043","title":"Are There Non-Propositional Implicatures?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Implicature; Grice; Utterance; Irony; Philosophy; Linguistics; Ambivalence; Content (measure theory); Counterfactual conditional; Counterfactual thinking; Pragmatics; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.02460427934318292,"score_gpt":0.29586172598089133,"score_spread":0.2712574466377084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294714117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8267308,0.00051343243,0.00034777794,0.106094606,0.0011440336,0.0006438498,0.0003478003,0.00020240284,0.0639753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99112093,8.0350077e-7,0.000019048273,0.0065756734,0.0011298977,0.00042919943,0.000071972834,0.00003088662,0.0006215668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983565,0.00036354992,0.0002197141,0.000359908,0.00038243973,0.00031789418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990186,0.000119966426,0.00015870009,0.0005705652,0.000043744498,0.000088389184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024851732,0.00016934924,0.00017876604,0.00005467207,0.000567173,0.00003523473,0.0005009539,0.000081510894,0.008588536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064129404,0.00011691112,0.00017353459,0.00022357517,0.0001239215,0.00004453141,0.00005082759,0.00071625394,0.0009907701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011100403,0.0015602431,0.00039081217,0.000021622374,0.0004368727,0.00058896997,0.010456504,0.0000056874774,0.0036872341,0.9393243,0.02173369,0.020684002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008834122,0.00083851395,0.03319377,0.000006378506,0.00008195887,0.00029226014,0.0041987672,0.00002634713,0.00003004866,0.9576197,0.0025632665,0.00026556215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041884923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054999346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16439015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003718122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015438856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298226323","doi":"10.1111/1467-9213.12003","title":"Totality and Infinity at 50. Edited By ScottDavidson and DianePerpich. (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press, 2012. Pp. x + 310. Price £21.99 pb.)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Infinity; Philosophy; Relation (database); Loyalty; Theology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027067288498912774,"score_gpt":0.21896355970525555,"score_spread":0.19189627120634278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298226323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79073554,0.0037916033,0.000042546173,0.13587846,0.0013110844,0.0014143854,0.0007023105,0.0004198935,0.06570417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925327,0.00043249657,0.000014025981,0.0013461072,0.0022675071,0.000015777065,0.00007488852,0.00003975933,0.003276762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760216,0.00038227972,0.00040270726,0.0006188285,0.0004448489,0.00054918067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817353,0.00037911956,0.00019700993,0.0006250878,0.00022289564,0.00040236872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042678928,0.0004249647,0.00048614526,0.000053810338,0.001200191,0.00041751575,0.00045324035,0.00027597605,0.0006135295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045295237,0.00033158564,0.0001311946,0.00005454541,0.0019834768,0.0010194954,0.00022019225,0.000797709,0.00012988834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037542757,0.00048741326,0.00012112752,0.00022145675,0.00028404786,0.000027928161,0.03895184,4.4051916e-7,0.0018185001,0.86250037,0.09408985,0.0011216111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015154517,0.00089391536,0.0025324875,0.00007632591,0.00022771663,0.000032306198,0.0011962227,0.00009267327,0.000029763693,0.6415235,0.35104504,0.00083464716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038869784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028641103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25695518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007602209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027855589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309223137","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqac071","title":"No Work for Fundamental Facts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Common ground; Philosophy; Theoretical physics; Physics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.040231575798912976,"score_gpt":0.30707317092592934,"score_spread":0.2668415951270164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309223137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23116617,0.00024340687,0.001664726,0.22404756,0.0058397325,0.0020212138,0.00045828996,0.00037861645,0.5341803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934606,2.0334741e-7,0.000072948984,0.004111375,0.0009133401,0.00049786945,0.000016357528,0.000021081423,0.0009062208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981337,0.00029754738,0.00025400898,0.00041689366,0.0003763993,0.0005214491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986428,0.0005569404,0.00007449163,0.0005263946,0.000029777046,0.00016958972],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065829646,0.0001681452,0.00018267828,0.00003860497,0.0008015135,0.000040876665,0.0008765507,0.000055412842,0.005241315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030924053,0.0001179364,0.00018197238,0.0003229765,0.00046504172,0.000057203157,0.00008998481,0.00045754213,0.001261138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005679407,0.0002778624,0.00003156217,0.00000239851,0.00003292754,0.000009981209,0.0013599758,0.0000026592404,0.00011904325,0.99333525,0.0011876922,0.0030727086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059738674,0.0018876563,0.0006882517,0.000002673081,0.000020714577,0.000022872824,0.00020846938,0.000030289648,0.0000044667527,0.98206085,0.014297877,0.00017849535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012352926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.5853528e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7622944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005597748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001716978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321372119","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad015","title":"On the Epistemic Significance of Perceptual Structure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Epistemology; Feature (linguistics); Reflection (computer programming); Field (mathematics); Cognitive science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.036897899751795,"score_gpt":0.2981722363906613,"score_spread":0.26127433663886634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321372119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7525611,0.000019677815,0.000046155812,0.18869773,0.00046166778,0.00033774826,0.00008158077,0.000107765365,0.05768657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767447,0.0000010010808,0.000003570723,0.0016730676,0.0004214201,0.0000375533,0.000004172139,0.000016190745,0.00016855892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801296,0.0004839789,0.0003009111,0.0003574384,0.00043786658,0.00040683476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970522,0.0018523188,0.000097659286,0.00085899857,0.000039115104,0.00009968935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062954193,0.0001788514,0.00021087787,0.000049832717,0.00023715888,0.000020922256,0.0010623902,0.00012486315,0.0019179862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111998044,0.00008542419,0.0001345703,0.0006774937,0.0015600999,0.00003626934,0.00003640324,0.00053288724,0.0016049127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113271824,0.00004931475,0.0000071962627,0.000004310236,0.000023910934,0.000009042532,0.0037494786,0.0000062769636,0.0035458135,0.9904416,0.00045611899,0.0015936343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017423558,0.00065854465,0.0029997015,0.000015582817,0.000014838868,0.000009761714,0.0005176633,0.00009325498,0.00012182934,0.99521047,0.00006966606,0.00011446746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017326207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020179518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24511337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015671805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017052454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362548770","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad041","title":"Shared Agency and Mutual Obligations: A Pluralist Account","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Agency (philosophy); Pooling; Law and economics; Virtue; Business; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06615503103286743,"score_gpt":0.2844559561807754,"score_spread":0.21830092514790797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362548770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8748759,0.000046386365,0.000018503026,0.12106644,0.00026956855,0.000277684,0.00008190814,0.00035365237,0.00300997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972668,0.00001999879,0.000012535746,0.0018066312,0.0004201736,0.000058625097,0.000009001332,0.000018343502,0.00038787487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860334,0.0001222293,0.00024047217,0.00038781558,0.0003347522,0.00031136133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909544,0.00033289645,0.00005581595,0.0003779495,0.000023185437,0.00011468711],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019110848,0.00015766006,0.0001403045,0.00008158947,0.00040771608,0.00013824561,0.00042158543,0.000064165084,0.00013626904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002112926,0.00010229363,0.000068235415,0.000642908,0.00031949056,0.00026108086,0.0000614941,0.00023149337,0.0014751361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007519958,0.00016831687,0.0001926977,0.00005038529,0.000016521628,0.00019786514,0.008028086,0.0000081048875,0.20338915,0.7663098,0.004729328,0.016834538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003607192,0.0002832503,0.008606664,0.000023016213,0.0000145701215,0.000043150194,0.00008950212,0.0025015615,0.0007685638,0.9861547,0.00093909225,0.00021523218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023119996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000063538837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21984486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013195543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019383979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366332519","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad047","title":"Response to LÖhr: Why We Still Need a New Normativism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13763127660680427,"score_gpt":0.3091230974619306,"score_spread":0.17149182085512635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366332519","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4547403,0.000005190024,0.00014835379,0.54360956,0.00032225074,0.00018756388,0.000014142021,0.00020537374,0.0007672925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612654,0.000005448711,0.00004879043,0.036802124,0.00032632504,0.000028496162,0.0000019311785,0.00001907941,0.0015024219],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979307,0.00045788565,0.0002690499,0.00040894363,0.00048358837,0.0004498164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984036,0.00073136616,0.000052184787,0.00046759789,0.000019819905,0.00032539948],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005338794,0.00018928584,0.0001844509,0.00015694606,0.0002002454,0.0000541626,0.0006562233,0.000080452744,0.00015498373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023083968,0.00012577427,0.00010635215,0.00076888583,0.00016545877,0.00012869055,0.00007016489,0.00031141128,0.009547028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005943678,0.00044242488,0.000025177213,0.000019724675,0.00003364815,0.0003327591,0.020083606,0.00016451898,0.61007315,0.10268294,0.23233102,0.02786735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093926844,0.0017848818,0.005184433,0.00004532266,0.000012376573,0.00007908413,0.00013553433,0.00035790302,0.0021610262,0.9489264,0.040072586,0.00030122293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018780616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002579524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84624344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027598117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003240866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99122417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377967813","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad053","title":"Degrees of Epistemic Criticizability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Normative; Criticism; Rationality; Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Epistemic virtue; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Virtue; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11664729969934759,"score_gpt":0.2987964625216315,"score_spread":0.1821491628222839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377967813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76081836,0.00016666848,0.000040164938,0.18973595,0.0012257795,0.00034460556,0.0001196795,0.00033394786,0.047214832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758494,0.000007762499,0.000015032792,0.00037987565,0.001106147,0.000021667467,0.000013239572,0.000018736846,0.000852597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985907,0.0002566198,0.0003974135,0.00021901386,0.0002553872,0.00028085426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835026,0.0008061842,0.00009483409,0.0005136159,0.0001714635,0.00006366487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007865292,0.00014717487,0.00030324285,0.000059202564,0.00027881213,0.000038668306,0.00037758035,0.00007953412,0.00023021769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010069688,0.00009685254,0.00019211495,0.00008623575,0.0018052607,0.00009470942,0.000029427818,0.00034275078,0.000450605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020069143,0.000067561814,0.000054984997,0.0000953653,0.00003450734,0.0000035267221,0.025589287,0.0000034843379,0.00020654296,0.97265565,0.00032386289,0.0009451468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016795498,0.0003557737,0.0008487637,0.000028516659,0.00004593619,0.000002559809,0.0027113305,0.00017632266,0.00003372361,0.99336314,0.0021417544,0.00012424501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018810593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021208882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23676656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012141706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030260257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6651558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378651348","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad055","title":"Attribution and Explanation in Relativism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Attribution; Epistemology; Philosophy; Nonsense; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10490703284357576,"score_gpt":0.28338271502863105,"score_spread":0.17847568218505527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378651348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8516546,0.00008520992,0.000065893575,0.13535902,0.0004564344,0.00020496665,0.000021712523,0.00014701439,0.012005126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833083,0.000014988847,0.0000033556119,0.00038531105,0.0006121752,0.000018905996,0.000029624636,0.000008401685,0.0005963792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992604,0.00014324585,0.00017301111,0.00014149577,0.00012388268,0.00015796836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994968,0.00025891187,0.00004410744,0.00013489294,0.00003518498,0.000030058636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005274607,0.00008163406,0.000120770244,0.00007321161,0.00020130734,0.00004695527,0.00008134562,0.000061081155,0.00003551316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024542172,0.000056825436,0.000033120887,0.000067471985,0.000341725,0.00013406594,0.000011472929,0.000282894,0.00020733119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009962354,0.00001711379,0.00009230178,0.0000100528705,0.000007310056,0.0000040161785,0.035902303,0.0000010132262,0.00003358424,0.9618568,0.00013806319,0.0019274994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023048723,0.00015584091,0.00530122,0.000016477741,0.000010259116,0.0000018316084,0.0015825782,0.00032260656,0.0000042120596,0.9868024,0.0054898444,0.00008226868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007669995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003219154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14667624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013781416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000094080315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2664892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380204502","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad059","title":"The Essential Berkeley and Neo-Berkeley","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Classics; Environmental ethics; Art history; Library science; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.047042627083861366,"score_gpt":0.269722702647228,"score_spread":0.2226800755633666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380204502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51721644,0.0006556863,0.000027937083,0.4192326,0.0028012432,0.00051346375,0.000056809422,0.00046934732,0.059026472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919351,0.00009176544,0.0000039297447,0.0011948439,0.0037754332,0.000036172823,0.0000135883165,0.000028942659,0.0029202646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848676,0.00026051793,0.00029319673,0.00026570112,0.00027920987,0.00041464064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983004,0.00096077396,0.00008739771,0.00046169813,0.00009379998,0.000095973846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078030775,0.00018422402,0.0002177592,0.00003947211,0.0015686234,0.00032117672,0.0003945186,0.0000901085,0.00007579896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052263655,0.00010355479,0.00013214054,0.000073944204,0.0019104338,0.0001212264,0.00005533383,0.0005334419,0.0005761893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000313023,0.000024622997,0.000010136381,0.000016513988,0.00006416726,0.000007973189,0.021595914,4.7339088e-7,0.000077113815,0.96898156,0.0022670107,0.0069231973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023736939,0.00026790547,0.00032480166,0.0000124889975,0.00005848906,0.0000074136487,0.0023255579,0.0001623969,0.000013127835,0.9235924,0.07283728,0.00016078785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014212534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006113955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47471863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008479715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027917706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387541980","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad099","title":"Work Hours, Free Time, and Economic Output","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; Queen's University; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; University of Ottawa; University of Hong Kong; Princeton University","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Perfectionism (psychology); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; State (computer science); Positive economics; Work (physics); Economics; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.060605162117082285,"score_gpt":0.35163709819904077,"score_spread":0.2910319360819585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387541980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6498327,0.00013579518,0.0000032905834,0.33673137,0.0004609871,0.0004107518,0.000049513925,0.00035545326,0.012020105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223447,0.00004469208,0.00000937352,0.0015404434,0.0015998223,0.00009211705,0.000016831922,0.000031682575,0.0044305767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858487,0.000257512,0.00031101317,0.00024869796,0.00013392894,0.00046400237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985598,0.0007574776,0.00008032869,0.0004705173,0.00002313684,0.00010878251],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005468172,0.00016133011,0.0002488357,0.0000629011,0.00086869346,0.000014798397,0.0003104621,0.00012160128,0.00023671091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040794617,0.00010457713,0.00006247728,0.00014880994,0.00017867658,0.00006547325,0.0001628869,0.00044073784,0.0077267713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004154461,0.000093250055,0.10622284,0.00009456093,0.00043107913,0.000037897644,0.030160282,0.000010393164,0.00006572337,0.14550185,0.69104093,0.02592572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012273318,0.00040873437,0.22757266,0.00013905865,0.00006490581,0.0000013490687,0.00075525086,0.00009172368,0.0000010151207,0.7597337,0.009688352,0.00031591833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000857998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043623775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6813526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002989785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389454697","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad110","title":"A Phasalist Approach to Coincidence Puzzles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Coincidence; Statue; Theoretical physics; Computer science; Physics; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.09263951266982616,"score_gpt":0.31740319964807423,"score_spread":0.22476368697824806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389454697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7159427,0.000006990798,0.0035214114,0.25630084,0.00013315528,0.00035828073,0.000025712554,0.0006973018,0.023013635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918407,0.0000057266866,0.00007475173,0.0068586166,0.0002376309,0.000060357193,0.00000381555,0.00001823921,0.0009001695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998292,0.0002011604,0.00022737838,0.00044683498,0.00048635894,0.00034621646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912274,0.00009066024,0.000043614837,0.0005225333,0.00002406742,0.00019641074],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032893155,0.00015171738,0.00017975684,0.00011777824,0.00031903828,0.00010141364,0.0006820721,0.000051427483,0.00010356412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014603711,0.000098065364,0.00013369726,0.0012104817,0.00025982576,0.000092471026,0.000052388703,0.00020668314,0.0054769698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013101965,0.0006058419,0.00004740072,0.000026205857,0.000011191209,0.00013736404,0.012986551,0.00036899478,0.29681036,0.6446273,0.008105598,0.03614222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097247196,0.0009483685,0.0030982418,0.000046422534,0.000095736745,0.00039254365,0.0018490868,0.03749667,0.0018503348,0.9407508,0.011463635,0.0010357372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015963902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024838444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2961235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019405003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017023422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389986811","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad116","title":"Imagining Out of Hope","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wishful thinking; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0389328396481385,"score_gpt":0.3278720984421399,"score_spread":0.2889392587940014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389986811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.520794,0.0001448735,0.00035489225,0.110924035,0.0023702392,0.0003767692,0.000023790712,0.0004976184,0.3645138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712026,0.000005892049,0.000048543265,0.00070613466,0.00082589476,0.00002576893,0.000009781239,0.000037692043,0.0012200136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984995,0.00018447869,0.00035903926,0.00030079737,0.0002413131,0.0004148861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987773,0.0003299592,0.00009951674,0.00064746535,0.000049996837,0.00009576388],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005198308,0.00016737932,0.00026600718,0.000105527746,0.00011634509,0.000026392994,0.00046945814,0.00010645801,0.0005326933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022687773,0.00011993072,0.00014609347,0.00033428654,0.00024055285,0.000072002076,0.00003740308,0.00035597436,0.004217874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034981078,0.00035554572,0.000835089,0.000055699045,0.0003668714,0.00020352584,0.10361395,0.00003371155,0.0035914031,0.781937,0.009081841,0.09957557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013072904,0.0010877639,0.008758833,0.000058306243,0.0000987136,0.000024164141,0.0034043314,0.0006216744,0.000115620816,0.9800105,0.00410761,0.00040517625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049474078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031310612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4763263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009811537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015713213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390352383","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad121","title":"Just Kidding? Two Roles for the Concept of Joking in Political Speech","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Utterance; Denial; Politics; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07932171114531744,"score_gpt":0.400574045486064,"score_spread":0.32125233434074657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390352383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44306022,0.00032481577,0.0006073283,0.51977265,0.0004479501,0.0014135563,0.00015225717,0.00016569716,0.034055505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981394,0.0000023797195,0.000032914257,0.00065837725,0.0007394884,0.00024577416,0.0000068766517,0.000018514818,0.00015628261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879193,0.000091999456,0.0003167695,0.00021779243,0.00014375226,0.0004377248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794763,0.0014640853,0.0000616138,0.00043976665,0.000032367407,0.00005452583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042055862,0.00011529244,0.00020687452,0.000047906684,0.00022363315,0.0000151848,0.00040484543,0.000057353383,0.00010820461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035161862,0.00006719065,0.00011724435,0.0003282797,0.00038508695,0.000013475717,0.00002825455,0.00023502918,0.00015497937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002810575,0.00006452894,0.00011824053,0.0000044443946,0.000044275857,0.0000032990492,0.0053233886,0.0000050924377,0.00007976699,0.9886742,0.0010538895,0.004600739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013161273,0.00041722367,0.009047656,0.000027778948,0.00008243387,0.000012764998,0.01870017,0.00085839565,0.00008253553,0.961776,0.00749407,0.00018481976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018158102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008499148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55507916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016686485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001364224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27399552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391915558","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae018","title":"‘Just The Facts’: Thick Concepts and Hermeneutical Misfit","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06515080768230051,"score_gpt":0.3722786520254367,"score_spread":0.30712784434313617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391915558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07305906,0.0031849092,0.000028088712,0.8224301,0.00076416344,0.0002841247,0.000009396917,0.00016550516,0.10007468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951134,0.000105087,0.0000074992,0.002496424,0.00097435794,0.000023931796,8.0059226e-7,0.000009126995,0.0012693957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984343,0.00049432385,0.00017648525,0.0002682659,0.0002835729,0.00034306652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840194,0.0012237992,0.000022066924,0.00022018337,0.000030731782,0.00010129167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009406351,0.00013361327,0.0001568144,0.000017839076,0.0013425736,0.00017160861,0.00034042046,0.00014684744,0.00012421876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007859351,0.000068400164,0.00007877767,0.00016411544,0.0029131386,0.00007780788,0.000040904404,0.00049487274,0.00025109667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001551126,0.000016904098,0.00008359483,0.000015153742,0.00006569385,0.000024569019,0.083319634,1.4189366e-7,0.000013372802,0.90827566,0.0015599682,0.0066098096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010739851,0.00022050457,0.002752537,0.000026170212,0.00007030856,0.000024398485,0.017124694,0.000055040928,0.0000032113435,0.9370906,0.04238403,0.00014111615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011570253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020146919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9220543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022648026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074578056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394760713","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae029","title":"Direct acquaintance with intrinsic value","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Introspection; Feeling; Property (philosophy); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Perception; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06329429139780074,"score_gpt":0.27508761393347575,"score_spread":0.211793322535675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394760713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5548343,0.00022928542,0.00048553938,0.39920592,0.00093373226,0.00040979713,0.00002092312,0.0004756073,0.043404877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350446,0.000010254321,0.0000451267,0.005450063,0.00060492725,0.000039150967,0.0000011389727,0.000017783244,0.0003270658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986306,0.00015576193,0.00015390934,0.00044565412,0.00034268288,0.0002713887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992133,0.0003472686,0.000023154182,0.00031559236,0.000011558764,0.00008913304],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020111534,0.00015586196,0.00013437217,0.00004788443,0.0001651215,0.000080212165,0.0003650705,0.00005140317,0.00010185844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021704522,0.00008170566,0.000071652554,0.00030010144,0.00039124212,0.00012880928,0.000019157147,0.00032127474,0.0011841747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023696467,0.00015132483,0.000011543444,0.000029237755,0.000025279263,0.00033143116,0.0006990824,0.000024005902,0.022855755,0.95627546,0.0010554583,0.018304478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037393186,0.0016404793,0.0012694575,0.00015314636,0.000035242865,0.000422656,0.000026765574,0.00060201465,0.0051731137,0.98369056,0.006319081,0.00029354612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052845157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016120349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43867016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028396886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000229538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396871923","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae047","title":"Speaking of ‘violence’: Figleaf use in sexualized violence contexts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sexual violence; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05623364159936818,"score_gpt":0.3373225134910299,"score_spread":0.2810888718916617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396871923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781178,0.001474761,0.00011495026,0.015258103,0.0008799307,0.00039625127,0.000027759941,0.00012467327,0.0036057255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985901,0.00027484683,0.00004126031,0.0003635871,0.0006264386,0.000021283375,0.0000030550952,0.000015195307,0.00006423368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997922,0.0004117265,0.00039832157,0.00032315042,0.00052772724,0.0004170452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985112,0.0009069961,0.000068065856,0.00030686008,0.00006578577,0.00014112105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011104988,0.00015179816,0.00026828953,0.000102937294,0.00013888645,0.00009938182,0.00047814738,0.00014514504,0.00013469106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002625215,0.000109534354,0.00010969553,0.00043309093,0.00058503787,0.00024895894,0.000024918936,0.0003687733,0.00009386274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121108256,0.00020595065,0.0013329784,0.00011213447,0.000051185325,0.00012327846,0.23314364,0.0000039892006,0.0018616391,0.52295285,0.00015190254,0.23993932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005252383,0.00035852627,0.0038249006,0.0014732738,0.000042619147,0.0000061239175,0.024267785,0.00018992036,0.00012351852,0.96609986,0.0027843257,0.000303886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002169056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013522815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.443147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052340063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017974443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44666812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399102349","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae058","title":"On the necessity of a pluralist theory of reparations for historical injustice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09956507770890535,"score_gpt":0.36338190596954456,"score_spread":0.26381682826063924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399102349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029485341,0.0003816655,0.004490395,0.888688,0.00082801376,0.00065495993,0.00013323217,0.00010787341,0.07523052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997514,0.0000065681447,0.000032139294,0.0012696284,0.0008408258,0.000039377115,0.0000022263735,0.00000941786,0.00028582386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998136,0.000669572,0.00034473796,0.00018276203,0.0004286989,0.00023826948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892778,0.010085475,0.00007585149,0.00033738097,0.00013282067,0.00009072045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024362355,0.00010293151,0.0001957393,0.0000412458,0.0005378001,0.000036444922,0.00048638502,0.00014459116,0.000064835054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001690428,0.000056423272,0.00021241605,0.0002918098,0.0013068594,0.0000930006,0.000016649694,0.0004071341,0.000020224858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010487574,0.00008388283,6.2123524e-7,0.000049270617,0.000030386505,7.6553425e-7,0.012305805,0.0000022326838,0.00008166651,0.9856941,0.001079395,0.00056699826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066436034,0.00040651992,0.00001934984,0.000055130156,0.000087775246,4.8768646e-7,0.0006582684,0.00013382794,0.000042228305,0.9947786,0.0036810657,0.00007035295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032105157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054708824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96802866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011666585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018247221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48151782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399501939","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae064","title":"Sceptical hypotheses and subjective indistinguishability","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Stipulation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029419507403158324,"score_gpt":0.3164241146487395,"score_spread":0.2870046072455812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399501939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5935967,0.0006238212,0.000451282,0.07499843,0.00082629937,0.00031821022,0.00003636756,0.00031517167,0.3288337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823564,0.0000014179486,0.00003459604,0.00064688746,0.0009436883,0.00004195473,0.0000011595023,0.000016772106,0.00007788606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821687,0.00031530033,0.00023863651,0.00056429027,0.00026813967,0.00039676062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976818,0.001639673,0.00002242222,0.00042018289,0.00003249039,0.0002034112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000809343,0.00018456805,0.00019654815,0.000049044098,0.00021254936,0.0001451635,0.0003545646,0.00012869416,0.00068874937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002266734,0.000108791326,0.000097081196,0.00032672373,0.0020120293,0.00009357446,0.000046858742,0.0005545613,0.0008601191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065800334,0.000088362496,0.00013282208,0.000012912121,0.00003458141,0.000048170532,0.0035404444,4.255296e-8,0.00010523416,0.97865564,0.000031880732,0.017284121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011328531,0.0005858124,0.017818687,0.00002628197,0.00003234142,0.00008572583,0.00018139806,0.00013282488,0.000010841714,0.98051935,0.00034156156,0.00015185631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029398525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030078513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40463892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026316195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021643176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404793796","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae142","title":"Interpersonal hope and loving attention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.016821088623474017,"score_gpt":0.29473705478994805,"score_spread":0.277915966166474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404793796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83628273,0.0015030171,0.0016661995,0.08785618,0.0017837852,0.00024778445,0.000010711983,0.00028536812,0.07036424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680096,0.000010289184,0.00004531681,0.00081332127,0.0012015926,0.000018839582,0.0000058443634,0.00003039831,0.0010734611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885577,0.00013661584,0.00021092541,0.00036543031,0.00015395171,0.00027730907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940276,0.00019954347,0.000025633963,0.00026138517,0.000018443232,0.0000922353],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032623424,0.00015941382,0.00014847993,0.000074655705,0.00013167795,0.00016398376,0.00018371074,0.00010920696,0.0006113009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006891606,0.00010934884,0.000102876314,0.00013784056,0.00017743437,0.0001283217,0.000026345637,0.00042513688,0.0012116226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015151502,0.00012400691,0.00030156362,0.00007550055,0.00026025667,0.00021385222,0.024167774,0.0000010030502,0.0014269984,0.7652807,0.0020737038,0.2059231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009668006,0.0017608323,0.013496488,0.00036243242,0.00024254317,0.000561716,0.0029477316,0.004916233,0.000014690913,0.9663746,0.0077048186,0.0006511472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037710153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038157973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20527194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019255855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010286218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407109770","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaf014","title":"More Equal Than Others: Humans and the Rights of Other Animals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Animal rights; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.015202659048994843,"score_gpt":0.2583861579738381,"score_spread":0.24318349892484328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407109770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7952353,0.0002693055,0.00041965063,0.14056452,0.00010210713,0.0005862985,0.000029530815,0.000042073425,0.06275122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970194,0.0000055713926,0.000059047925,0.0025424503,0.00010383472,0.000023865705,9.353493e-7,0.000012474665,0.00023241174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855137,0.00025142884,0.00031159693,0.0002995291,0.00035169267,0.00023437974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889714,0.0004019523,0.00009944483,0.0005394316,0.000004037368,0.0000579831],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006417091,0.00019328132,0.00024338652,0.000022062963,0.00034994885,0.000029154398,0.0005353024,0.00012285155,0.00041298274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014639292,0.000098073586,0.000117725715,0.00016262717,0.0035478743,0.00009657646,0.00012681255,0.0003726217,0.00011939315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037996302,0.00015212232,0.0017313102,0.000020020952,0.00008495612,0.0000027068384,0.008013016,0.000041378607,0.0032894693,0.9850953,0.00017485647,0.0010148745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089408027,0.00020534724,0.007323595,0.00002805085,0.000057233014,0.0000027467893,0.00022733022,0.0001728874,0.00040393104,0.9898293,0.00072990544,0.00012556744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004777298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006213823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2017841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031600583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041776007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407793948","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaf003","title":"Does the value of rational activity explain the badness of human extinction?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford","keywords":"Happiness; Utopia; Dystopia; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Value (mathematics); Object (grammar); Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.024957955975460477,"score_gpt":0.2676300319078894,"score_spread":0.24267207593242895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407793948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6736265,0.00009604337,0.000101197686,0.26952657,0.0009443841,0.0003909183,0.00006002289,0.000035659225,0.055218738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972494,0.0000020895473,0.000002417314,0.000775383,0.0010190918,0.00004229859,0.0000045898632,0.000007565794,0.00089716824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859494,0.00052001944,0.00033704442,0.00016940013,0.00022551595,0.00015306192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980487,0.0010754489,0.0001952678,0.0005392776,0.000120902696,0.000020406438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007090911,0.00015241842,0.00023669517,0.0000461141,0.001011268,0.00003748305,0.00062800373,0.00006809383,0.0008039921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003581051,0.000055062515,0.0001847301,0.00006919507,0.0021931569,0.00011467872,0.00004318321,0.0003657201,0.00001406199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012989892,0.0001566,0.00004434819,0.000024476889,0.000113150076,3.3615132e-7,0.00972409,0.000005598766,0.0007245552,0.9877791,0.00020836074,0.0010895252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025995492,0.00026190048,0.0027041847,0.000029829025,0.00008511168,0.0000011286357,0.0011075669,0.000058786733,0.0004484276,0.9924578,0.002507435,0.000077865516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010130309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018746324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32362294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009620821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038980234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88031495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414451984","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaf084","title":"Hermeneutic decentering","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Relation (database); Hermeneutics; Phenomenon; Exposition (narrative)","score_opus":0.02794017645619367,"score_gpt":0.34455838881134127,"score_spread":0.3166182123551476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414451984","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06614496,0.00039511343,0.00018167167,0.48045665,0.0008225397,0.00019518286,0.0000016083901,0.00012621294,0.45167607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541,0.000024179417,0.000018257075,0.0023562443,0.00022915925,0.000020625936,4.0508098e-7,0.0000032305595,0.001937891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990796,0.0002389888,0.00013962906,0.00015421402,0.00013043472,0.0002571593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994704,0.00023549635,0.000025546635,0.00019683878,0.000029910892,0.000041808813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004405925,0.00007763139,0.00011736472,0.000029693341,0.0010205363,0.0000348079,0.0003286676,0.00007339082,0.000049582446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004983922,0.000055177672,0.00006079617,0.00019190132,0.00063720654,0.00004017139,0.000028352897,0.0001635477,0.00010678306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002191329,0.000037149654,0.0006753758,0.000007805909,0.00004750522,0.0000053160184,0.014359503,3.6908872e-7,0.00002338829,0.97538453,0.0006274962,0.00880967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014394689,0.00006712132,0.0044160294,0.000017623952,0.00002393648,0.0000011298239,0.0036415285,0.000007860534,0.000007427348,0.9718499,0.019749777,0.00007367084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093575436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028016703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034267592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054081884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7849244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903487049","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaf033","title":"Consent theory as hermeneutical injustice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Informed consent; Feminist theory; Ethical theory; Feminism","score_opus":0.04677474804174056,"score_gpt":0.38095658337784144,"score_spread":0.3341818353361009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903487049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042210978,0.00020804988,0.0010635295,0.44771826,0.0007983547,0.0003455506,0.000003947872,0.00020722949,0.5074441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872861,0.000029740802,0.000027020476,0.0076708873,0.0004931419,0.00002808515,0.0000012409776,0.0000057016837,0.004458073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983836,0.00063202315,0.00020083316,0.00019499879,0.00031206367,0.00027651803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978561,0.0016942669,0.000037138216,0.00021276042,0.000115080766,0.0000846541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008398883,0.00010827349,0.00015177189,0.000044751294,0.0008148985,0.000080599195,0.0003187353,0.00009750349,0.00029211483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050060195,0.00007292959,0.00006195162,0.0003693439,0.0009290579,0.000065170105,0.00003363273,0.00021679787,0.00037407246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006671769,0.00006819036,0.00007990656,0.0000049688974,0.000046730573,0.0000025858155,0.014148705,0.0000015165857,0.0000155833,0.9794167,0.0009469407,0.00520142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021252887,0.00010764405,0.0004832543,0.000014267484,0.000065584696,7.404662e-7,0.015121403,0.000024862551,0.0000066971647,0.95806,0.025809348,0.000093656396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016262529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013711573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94507515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043619868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016969469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62676233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}