{"meta":{"query_hash":"af7198e10881","filters":{"venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly"},"cohort_total":56,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":56,"exported":56,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af7198e10881","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Philosophical+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1505598217","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.685_8.x","title":"Grounding Concepts: an Empirical Basis for Arithmetical Knowledge - C.S. Jenkins","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arithmetic function; Naturalism; Empiricism; Realism; Epistemology; Mental arithmetic; A priori and a posteriori; Analytic philosophy; Analogical reasoning; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Contemporary philosophy; Discrete mathematics; Analogy","score_opus":0.09857317016457481,"score_gpt":0.34247723168526517,"score_spread":0.24390406152069036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505598217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29660803,0.037692692,0.103797935,0.12041452,0.000815067,0.00022738145,0.00072863646,0.00026168022,0.43945405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716412,0.0052695554,0.015450001,0.0018780015,0.0001864689,0.000080970545,0.00014618199,0.00004873079,0.0052987738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805766,0.000950271,0.00010478791,0.00031142114,0.0004913735,0.000084383784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96976614,0.02533972,0.0010235144,0.0014202354,0.002153126,0.0002972392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00416158,0.00028154,0.00048278435,0.002906966,0.0013075107,0.0035769204,0.00085248705,0.0015485443,0.005627671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032618493,0.0004386498,0.00032240545,0.0031086286,0.015082053,0.013174455,0.0017900936,0.0028333797,0.00046842586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002082205,0.000054680888,0.003213857,0.00012015137,0.00002141908,0.0000722872,0.006332514,0.0005824351,0.00017424946,0.9548758,0.0065224324,0.028009286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013960927,0.00002201164,0.005644729,0.0002094282,0.00001226465,0.000085687345,0.0031667834,0.00097356853,0.00020553051,0.96905845,0.020580413,0.000027031308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047092414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042999065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005627671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002075331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016533164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022008836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826353452","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.674.x","title":"HOW TO USE A CONCEPT YOU REJECT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Ascription; Principle of compositionality; Inference; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Cognition; Computer science; Philosophy of language; Normative; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.052176172333042725,"score_gpt":0.23318436125725658,"score_spread":0.18100818892421386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1826353452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24260058,0.0032700717,0.20352487,0.10739283,0.0022057202,0.0001616447,0.00019943561,0.0006912222,0.43995363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96459574,0.00047444043,0.018088497,0.003515624,0.00031981224,0.00007949338,0.00005980087,0.00021285709,0.012653682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913015,0.0034638674,0.00050743326,0.0014961831,0.002444,0.0007870545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98528266,0.0064627156,0.0012584019,0.0035643685,0.002856865,0.00057502754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012919999,0.00048984005,0.0006428307,0.0009472864,0.003025074,0.005792931,0.0015520355,0.004189857,0.006204896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03250312,0.00053676346,0.00082267524,0.0005237505,0.027387297,0.021694306,0.0040548714,0.0070278263,0.0022960093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004270887,0.00002579968,0.0009635916,0.00005855475,0.000024861027,0.00020406455,0.012307577,0.00011554986,0.00085678895,0.9717525,0.0023681768,0.011279794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027654527,0.00006980783,0.000981565,0.00020832104,0.000048333815,0.0006283879,0.010363646,0.0012815159,0.0027439424,0.8976576,0.0859274,0.000062017825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016284264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011001392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012919999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013825025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016988574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06832826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971338664","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00004.x","title":"An Introduction to Philosophical Methods. By ChrisDaly. (Toronto: Broadview, 2010. Pp. 257. US$32.95.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Library science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.07592193641619185,"score_gpt":0.3191050254458789,"score_spread":0.24318308902968702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971338664","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027689873,0.6554275,0.01566775,0.07443484,0.008779974,0.0001336474,0.0026501217,0.0014303275,0.24119882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004543331,0.3137431,0.0143226115,0.012852521,0.0053538475,0.00028738487,0.0018332575,0.0013836023,0.64568037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998389,0.00040258368,0.00015593176,0.0001644157,0.0007902264,0.00009778698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624145,0.002161889,0.00022313393,0.00019121074,0.00078646163,0.00039583264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023016264,0.002386022,0.0012765487,0.0038929472,0.0017448209,0.0032882972,0.0012888089,0.0026682483,0.24215378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044704336,0.0019933935,0.00095709285,0.005479989,0.0026688892,0.008763761,0.0028464252,0.005633077,0.13711001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007733382,0.0000075867847,0.000043119355,0.00037903097,0.000005171306,0.000027827049,0.00030312705,0.00006551082,0.0001077227,0.005821949,0.9371098,0.05612138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026783296,0.0000043039854,0.00024227865,0.00038795077,0.0000023860823,0.00007086114,0.00014320025,0.000030352076,0.000025751953,0.0054986277,0.9935847,0.0000069231824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03192806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089745075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24215378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047796047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004909315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81008506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979798094","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu086","title":"On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Democratic legitimacy; Ideal theory; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03758842339145689,"score_gpt":0.30199081675264644,"score_spread":0.26440239336118954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979798094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01975806,0.004178091,0.047858603,0.057432417,0.00064833136,0.00007535051,0.000113975264,0.00007238513,0.8698628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774345,0.0022445722,0.010913491,0.00452365,0.0005265043,0.00019397939,0.00008064331,0.00008127208,0.104001395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974432,0.0016183932,0.000043810236,0.00021741098,0.00041091023,0.00026625814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990068,0.00054097513,0.00008093235,0.00012583485,0.00011756119,0.00012790998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002826884,0.00036126582,0.00039132635,0.0010474524,0.0050221556,0.0073752757,0.0012153977,0.0023630722,0.0044026286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025536243,0.0002350495,0.0005614646,0.0016581323,0.021608206,0.008524415,0.002744171,0.005133098,0.0010443944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015952396,0.0000028045697,0.000025661953,0.0000034266618,6.7123517e-7,0.000009249315,0.0006540167,0.00015962594,0.0000063525304,0.99736315,0.0011059628,0.0006674661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006392316,0.000005452823,0.00007914921,0.00002517681,0.0000015276545,0.00001792554,0.0005767483,0.0007508681,0.00002134893,0.96133125,0.037180986,0.000003227414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005708754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065074996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073752757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050305543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039680423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03649944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989911624","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00099.x","title":"The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. By A.W.Moore. (Cambridge UP, 2012. Pp. xxi + 668. Price £70.00 h/b.)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Common sense; Hegelianism; Humanity; Theology","score_opus":0.028934280135411976,"score_gpt":0.2397235360089836,"score_spread":0.21078925587357164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989911624","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026950796,0.8930013,0.0020363124,0.050184153,0.00557506,0.000014464011,0.00018286813,0.00011117638,0.04862515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027016236,0.6487449,0.007956987,0.02145301,0.010648239,0.00015187434,0.00042099622,0.0004986307,0.28310916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925417,0.00017424673,0.00006456236,0.00013463266,0.00031421686,0.000058096008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991905,0.00041255594,0.000101206424,0.000069367576,0.00015634549,0.00006990976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009485883,0.0016458037,0.0006463012,0.0025331974,0.0012973938,0.002991725,0.0010985772,0.0030673947,0.026374668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030033006,0.0013224719,0.0008350278,0.0027987927,0.004628066,0.00983298,0.0021610588,0.005354139,0.016391613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003874423,0.00002288813,0.00016677876,0.0006301781,0.000022315857,0.000072955016,0.00083232217,0.00017469931,0.00023633975,0.09036708,0.7789662,0.12846953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050816684,0.000008222515,0.00056374475,0.0006417349,0.0000048858838,0.00014735748,0.0002328393,0.00009648874,0.00007506771,0.058971535,0.93924105,0.000012015451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007924101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011274235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026374668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027674853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016819222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08823204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024551125","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.659_11.x","title":"God, the Best, and Evil - Bruce Langtry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Theism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Determinism; Theodicy; Doctrine; Dialectic; Problem of evil; Philosophy of religion; Theology","score_opus":0.025379000939391525,"score_gpt":0.23241860920145027,"score_spread":0.20703960826205875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024551125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006153643,0.13084169,0.0029401907,0.2508204,0.010765762,0.00002145261,0.0001209294,0.000070715316,0.5982651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35527503,0.05050336,0.0030189166,0.05821089,0.006128828,0.000072226714,0.00019633536,0.00021588839,0.52637845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920064,0.00030918425,0.000022901882,0.000095147894,0.0002957793,0.00007639933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912363,0.0005182759,0.000058081107,0.000039132356,0.00014263249,0.00011811641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083981676,0.00038469638,0.00036132854,0.00061431446,0.0031785998,0.0043100994,0.00047382494,0.0019009843,0.009973866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025328165,0.00027840683,0.00018476184,0.00062700635,0.0064972728,0.005605261,0.0019773233,0.0060066185,0.0023720101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029910907,0.000020538946,0.00025291677,0.00008013885,0.0000060136417,0.00011032268,0.0034047368,0.00006632532,0.00013551117,0.50949323,0.46891147,0.01748886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005840572,0.000017432869,0.0004728189,0.0004157445,0.0000032142007,0.0002072424,0.0019562803,0.000104109975,0.0001476735,0.0977181,0.8989388,0.000012805227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004571466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009549368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009973866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022141142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010941087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033365846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030804302","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00027.x","title":"Emotional Truth. By Ronaldde Sousa. (Oxford UP, 2011. Pp. xviii + 391. Price £38.00.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Renaissance and Early Modern Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Meaning (existential); Rationality; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06621202068372399,"score_gpt":0.2310850002675672,"score_spread":0.16487297958384323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030804302","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002715506,0.8662048,0.00088647427,0.028170733,0.013439904,0.000025235557,0.00049533445,0.00023310303,0.09027293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062136585,0.44339204,0.0016944021,0.008646455,0.0068406886,0.00011801807,0.00053826044,0.00031387588,0.53224254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946517,0.000107372754,0.000057630125,0.00011074532,0.00021175145,0.000047285957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992093,0.00036929897,0.000083998326,0.00004704183,0.00020021103,0.00009008474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008511336,0.0021952926,0.0010419417,0.0022884118,0.0014769125,0.003808767,0.0010352278,0.0027195483,0.115503475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022846938,0.0013601214,0.0007730563,0.0030422402,0.0016993693,0.007530341,0.0023397738,0.004715186,0.089083344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025096926,0.000010723033,0.00009157253,0.0006605668,0.000010575481,0.00006855569,0.00035583915,0.00009092865,0.00010597425,0.0068212883,0.88118815,0.1105708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030188703,0.000005444507,0.0003364949,0.00055383774,0.0000034103266,0.00022503617,0.0002280931,0.000033941767,0.000024979734,0.0028886017,0.9956899,0.000007094688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009765802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016513852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115503475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018594841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014464572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3863976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053307472","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu076","title":"ONLY POWERS CAN CONFER DISPOSITIONS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Property (philosophy); Power (physics); Epistemology; Realism; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01701755659632519,"score_gpt":0.2829806154926726,"score_spread":0.2659630588963474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053307472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2876545,0.0006734557,0.08965071,0.008031398,0.00043087907,0.00010702776,0.00024727255,0.0002934782,0.6129114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98588514,0.00017509953,0.0040257913,0.000482646,0.000110864734,0.000048861428,0.000055727312,0.00006128099,0.00915468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948354,0.0019470138,0.00028622372,0.0010507514,0.0010957447,0.00078504276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166393,0.002831624,0.0007420174,0.0028384319,0.0011083452,0.0008156476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004505092,0.0004856588,0.00057066046,0.0010941613,0.0037247369,0.0044802316,0.00065750134,0.0014945954,0.008065318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014102086,0.00050848455,0.00075032795,0.0005415887,0.01663864,0.0126677165,0.0059965285,0.0027914364,0.0012439075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018017923,0.000010859387,0.0008406407,0.000020132062,0.000008217383,0.000070006674,0.0011705037,0.00011551564,0.00032428445,0.99386615,0.0004085923,0.003146984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022025713,0.000051187588,0.0020635056,0.000054112843,0.000030314719,0.00023411811,0.0008517958,0.00045588322,0.0006791652,0.9767169,0.018814744,0.000026155512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014563425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012612032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008065318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017167316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013426311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026981175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053540791","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00040.x","title":"Forgiveness. By Eve Garrard and David McNaughton. (Acumen Publishing Ltd, 2010. Pp. xi + 132. Price £9.99.)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Christian Theology and Mission","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Publishing; Alice (programming language); Theology; History; Classics; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.03099432678517387,"score_gpt":0.23499726235040688,"score_spread":0.20400293556523302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053540791","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006438352,0.6457093,0.001204337,0.0857127,0.022006322,0.00008297738,0.00083877903,0.0007643571,0.24303745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032727697,0.13190052,0.00079027,0.008210051,0.0030456977,0.00005297721,0.00025895613,0.0003734269,0.85209537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990914,0.00017464436,0.000071577444,0.00013745969,0.0004425771,0.000082389386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986634,0.0005086241,0.00017846258,0.00006685387,0.00029335724,0.00028926422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014319719,0.002528124,0.0010386424,0.0020972316,0.0014838129,0.003924773,0.0011305409,0.00308555,0.2625619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034630778,0.000958038,0.00059374917,0.002086265,0.001269526,0.0077075125,0.0030118693,0.00375938,0.20408028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016471313,0.0000048277275,0.000032820255,0.00019447647,0.0000027897452,0.000028505321,0.00012362089,0.000019330093,0.00006160497,0.0010240779,0.9502619,0.04822961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056183094,0.000010034841,0.00029745538,0.00052637485,0.0000032980493,0.00021071776,0.00027167797,0.00002377201,0.000051334373,0.00095156993,0.9976393,0.000008864055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005970383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016541056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2625619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017568843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011452723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.878357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060574362","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.581_6.x","title":"The One and the Many: Reading Isaiah Berlin - George Crowder and Henry Hardy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Thomas Hardy Literature Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Reading (process); Classics; Philosophy; History; Art; Art history; Linguistics","score_opus":0.028440154259749682,"score_gpt":0.21713304845973,"score_spread":0.1886928941999803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060574362","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001350489,0.5352746,0.00090127264,0.2762593,0.025502386,0.000017400936,0.00011903999,0.000060589682,0.16051485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06874906,0.3781642,0.0016811996,0.06284246,0.036958672,0.00011428897,0.0002157211,0.00027333936,0.45100102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934965,0.00022635497,0.00002148903,0.00009034416,0.0002546009,0.00005760643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989679,0.0005432075,0.00008294126,0.000036247693,0.00019685,0.00017293401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015176112,0.001095617,0.00068620674,0.0025563294,0.0048381262,0.0060551995,0.0010209267,0.00290778,0.019744935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004251118,0.00048224692,0.00025940052,0.0021028107,0.007190257,0.0087574255,0.002755191,0.0045292745,0.005646305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012607422,0.0000113361275,0.00006634233,0.00014068492,0.0000037703885,0.00008019265,0.0056305267,0.000045312136,0.000073827636,0.05926506,0.9132814,0.021388965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032820485,0.000004113899,0.0003063661,0.0005699589,0.0000028795776,0.0000881569,0.0032467057,0.000015094931,0.00003387794,0.017326912,0.97839487,0.0000077506365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020050298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030066647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020050298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004981187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035438905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06605339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065056736","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv014","title":"Moral Deference and Deference to an Epistemic Peer","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Morality; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24432780029377044,"score_gpt":0.31490333800443804,"score_spread":0.0705755377106676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065056736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45349672,0.0022296866,0.123694204,0.06856796,0.0012531132,0.0001518762,0.000092643444,0.00029271725,0.35022104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932672,0.00013361598,0.0023104094,0.0010030096,0.00014513258,0.000023490567,0.0000089199175,0.0000156073,0.0030925705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97400314,0.013659226,0.0011414599,0.0030839427,0.0060109966,0.0021011436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91816854,0.038160708,0.010171488,0.011261232,0.016565692,0.0056724106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019542985,0.00040993717,0.0006571646,0.0017554582,0.00623566,0.0065551666,0.0016454502,0.0058448743,0.0034418032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10932956,0.0003667827,0.0006088574,0.0008485997,0.028479999,0.009796792,0.008563341,0.005481026,0.00051794644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006254438,0.000032943237,0.0032961306,0.000101094636,0.000024286974,0.0007435482,0.021390747,0.0003905033,0.00071709603,0.961863,0.0017040387,0.009674115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029751578,0.00010050212,0.0028262169,0.00016363806,0.000041251573,0.0010716986,0.00762449,0.0016093802,0.001059124,0.9572821,0.028132796,0.000059067224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026063207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014652517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019542985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024533651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034802395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103354394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088029763","doi":"10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00390.x","title":"BUDD AND BRADY ON THE AESTHETICS OF NATURE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Natural (archaeology); Art; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01245659355721366,"score_gpt":0.22612503485604915,"score_spread":0.2136684412988355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088029763","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017224657,0.5077463,0.0016511474,0.2048238,0.013676035,0.000021051565,0.000094061324,0.000032415028,0.2702327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16692749,0.2531196,0.0038290403,0.08427069,0.013014322,0.00018736818,0.00019064214,0.00028383618,0.47817704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991743,0.0003627355,0.000023320694,0.00012338294,0.00023500632,0.00008115547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991856,0.00041311613,0.00004822929,0.00005734305,0.0002010403,0.00009464338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008567652,0.0010972306,0.0005688648,0.00095265365,0.004220553,0.0036131227,0.0008035673,0.003707473,0.007485805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028448,0.00057140714,0.000445405,0.0012446536,0.007903275,0.0058246353,0.0020698328,0.006769549,0.0030035789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003064527,0.000018245873,0.00012852662,0.0001332233,0.0000067487335,0.00006917897,0.0025050854,0.00010083793,0.00013771112,0.30771762,0.6690851,0.020067181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012906653,0.000008715921,0.0005375875,0.00046464746,0.00000539166,0.00011615234,0.0017475887,0.000059997732,0.000101358295,0.13694252,0.8599921,0.000011064129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009181683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022870166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009181683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028570993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011974284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025042534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092335477","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.520.x","title":"DESIRING THE BAD UNDER THE GUISE OF THE GOOD","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Content (measure theory); Mental state; Element (criminal law); Epistemology; Psychology; State (computer science); Aesthetics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05312159902442484,"score_gpt":0.26175964524513423,"score_spread":0.2086380462207094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092335477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034169354,0.0030746493,0.032516006,0.046728726,0.00079108804,0.000034701858,0.00005111727,0.0001016565,0.8825328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458971,0.0013061845,0.0037537266,0.005736151,0.00035821093,0.000042942058,0.000018764595,0.00008079088,0.04280607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978005,0.0013628022,0.000051767467,0.0002160585,0.0003531344,0.00021575046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823207,0.0007183014,0.00021360903,0.00031055845,0.00024589553,0.0002796382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002549919,0.00032191005,0.00029991387,0.0006260823,0.0032528515,0.00603042,0.0004890626,0.002303162,0.004809335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003909955,0.00017715919,0.00037802817,0.00048641674,0.029621443,0.0058068912,0.00348616,0.0036636074,0.0009103635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118134185,0.0000064446135,0.0001827512,0.000017514,0.0000035722064,0.000034760527,0.0040491996,0.00004761575,0.00011695596,0.990466,0.0020345787,0.0030288934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109492685,0.000060434137,0.000863538,0.000112704765,0.000016448465,0.00036705704,0.008141886,0.00048510786,0.0006044881,0.8247373,0.16457258,0.000027451584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012456748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021252595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00603042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014532731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011947595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016088903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125824432","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.503.x","title":"MULGAN'S FUTURE PEOPLE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Morality; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02375246985948648,"score_gpt":0.24439729856487882,"score_spread":0.22064482870539234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125824432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006455258,0.016258802,0.0047124824,0.19537711,0.0048804022,0.000029412597,0.00010076433,0.000059812814,0.77212596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2874595,0.013951922,0.004217043,0.06492119,0.0020687045,0.00017732348,0.00010217071,0.00011734995,0.62698483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998971,0.000539337,0.000020551524,0.00012079746,0.00022097267,0.00012731904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992424,0.00039218555,0.000052847332,0.000056308832,0.00014894147,0.00010726062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014416929,0.00036631795,0.0002580069,0.0006261879,0.004451929,0.0030644247,0.00049516244,0.002532449,0.012034403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026827203,0.00017608826,0.00021763695,0.00038702777,0.0062780096,0.005927101,0.002003563,0.0037257774,0.0017823755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008622547,0.000007602683,0.00009157709,0.00003117715,0.0000012844047,0.000047388476,0.0041029616,0.00003533259,0.000034124892,0.8408622,0.14532197,0.009455789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030266344,0.000009024486,0.00018887814,0.00012523758,0.0000013868155,0.00013806332,0.0022005215,0.000091305636,0.000060924838,0.14994466,0.84723026,0.0000067680385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037170846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008697621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012034403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023968266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019928587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040259123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142934754","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu033","title":"Counter Closure and Knowledge Despite Falsehood","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Prima facie; Epistemology; Denial; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.045700079642187946,"score_gpt":0.2577492157369722,"score_spread":0.21204913609478424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142934754","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18405955,0.0070434534,0.42908388,0.06107873,0.0022067802,0.00018232547,0.00035360866,0.00065354444,0.31533813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741805,0.00074227556,0.019022264,0.0017390068,0.00043410357,0.000093541734,0.00009619093,0.00008921049,0.0036029057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98241526,0.0077659898,0.0012000444,0.0036171859,0.0037040843,0.001297529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93360674,0.045949146,0.0041881725,0.010475441,0.004553482,0.0012270442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017724533,0.00065175624,0.0013835786,0.0029251822,0.0046907105,0.008667914,0.0021718617,0.0056019104,0.004736839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06832392,0.0007578011,0.0016479212,0.0013844597,0.045733437,0.028710252,0.009533529,0.0074836756,0.0006248287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003527107,0.000009404458,0.00029858688,0.000062991465,0.000010522765,0.0002459029,0.0021550034,0.00018872666,0.00015344303,0.99242216,0.0005772018,0.0038407915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013554384,0.00001128195,0.000110422705,0.000058453257,0.000010986457,0.00023147833,0.00039642386,0.00057043997,0.00044938232,0.99118793,0.006948749,0.000010957577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010684421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004944767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017724533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032196122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002549434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093737364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150056758","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00082.x","title":"The Ought-Is Gap: Trouble For Hybrid Semantics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expressivism; Epistemology; Normative; Semantics (computer science); Ontology; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11911483433510818,"score_gpt":0.30034796166571776,"score_spread":0.1812331273306096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150056758","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09341479,0.0022044505,0.5848167,0.041349053,0.0007480567,0.000103697246,0.00025226927,0.0008313053,0.27627966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578418,0.00032362936,0.033689335,0.0017451147,0.0002229388,0.00014271526,0.0000894332,0.00026192388,0.0056832647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994718,0.002656368,0.00033289922,0.00082341896,0.0011246413,0.00034477454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897995,0.00594364,0.00042033286,0.0024636292,0.0009134487,0.00045949087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00981073,0.0005058041,0.001224456,0.0018422445,0.0040373662,0.0074866517,0.0018191056,0.0033274954,0.006446279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013287929,0.00060445874,0.0014266995,0.0010165573,0.024658628,0.023429304,0.0068189125,0.006152117,0.0007685346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007103504,0.0000032495425,0.000050621733,0.000010470471,0.0000029117268,0.000014824215,0.0006663576,0.00004957236,0.00005144304,0.99765575,0.00022150045,0.0012661663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040323735,0.0000039352312,0.00003360425,0.000010741281,0.0000028848817,0.000031525735,0.00040426006,0.0004031745,0.00008055945,0.9964174,0.0026041951,0.0000036739555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011114246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010064868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00981073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024200997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017302213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05188471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323964502","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv001","title":"Aristotle's Teaching in the Politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Politics; Classics; Art history; Art; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.11581874193964115,"score_gpt":0.3701955205711614,"score_spread":0.25437677863152025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323964502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051560923,0.05580002,0.0040433654,0.10564705,0.006391746,0.00001069112,0.00012990079,0.000103456856,0.8227176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5077117,0.038575582,0.003000668,0.014493121,0.009972464,0.000029204652,0.00013910801,0.00017511782,0.425903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926823,0.00030230213,0.000019745858,0.0000748126,0.00028013514,0.000054646705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943274,0.00029555245,0.000030416968,0.00005466769,0.00011336984,0.00007325064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007825867,0.0002846357,0.00025173486,0.00094329333,0.0033338098,0.0036032181,0.0002703518,0.001454878,0.011915151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002128754,0.00016177501,0.00016179399,0.0008828229,0.007856945,0.0022913574,0.0008167085,0.0024142954,0.0026926142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009110143,0.000009367803,0.00008798764,0.000047822814,0.0000024893707,0.000033274868,0.0016077125,0.000099815705,0.00010746996,0.85717773,0.12690997,0.013907222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000574754,0.000008972287,0.00053871603,0.00018967442,0.0000031328143,0.000090316906,0.0007905691,0.00011272347,0.00015430705,0.29613963,0.70196027,0.000005914511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006946979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007839319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011915151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003855208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029271662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03986013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2386396958","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv113","title":"Wittgenstein and Heidegger","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Intelligibility (philosophy); Metaphysics","score_opus":0.0826653683557193,"score_gpt":0.240398759592291,"score_spread":0.1577333912365717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2386396958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0136770755,0.12714288,0.0041544507,0.23542634,0.006392571,0.000025285519,0.00010057104,0.000108975546,0.61297184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5186015,0.053069364,0.0035430898,0.07305063,0.0059349625,0.00010867101,0.00015823246,0.0004179656,0.34511557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986846,0.0004323256,0.000039950784,0.0003110897,0.00031212953,0.000219866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924576,0.00038720912,0.0000671635,0.000091364665,0.00012879813,0.00007974281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015603877,0.00054051186,0.00043045118,0.0016188818,0.0038720383,0.005366311,0.0006132474,0.004118512,0.009092719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050321897,0.00035602055,0.0003263863,0.0017523266,0.014534124,0.010247248,0.0018201814,0.004090779,0.0020446545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010864245,0.000010858217,0.00009269938,0.000022034335,0.000002730608,0.00004121065,0.0019873548,0.000035256966,0.00004039819,0.9212725,0.067412525,0.009071658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072923553,0.000009435164,0.00030537488,0.00021810313,0.0000039751135,0.00012446124,0.0017964464,0.000106150765,0.00018699067,0.48751163,0.509715,0.000015150195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006835016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070839543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009092719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004764796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017710422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03457117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461673724","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqw046","title":"Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Luck; Sophistication; Normative; Sociology; Theme (computing); Law and economics; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Philosophy; Social science; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06931681673672753,"score_gpt":0.38181295744562166,"score_spread":0.31249614070889414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461673724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013066057,0.014172194,0.011329809,0.027185217,0.00067567074,0.000045876342,0.00010986988,0.000041543997,0.93337375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564722,0.008356869,0.0038273109,0.0073848246,0.0022290202,0.00023868588,0.00008885217,0.000103301674,0.121298976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934273,0.0024618634,0.00021116908,0.001111461,0.0017008214,0.0010874704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967068,0.001868815,0.00029002954,0.0004159778,0.00039728323,0.0003210668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004435957,0.0004607253,0.00073378475,0.0015549199,0.0047334544,0.012772456,0.0012625422,0.0036130527,0.013395257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007221768,0.00025175407,0.0005098913,0.0022062704,0.025275167,0.012197994,0.0067921286,0.0042268843,0.001299146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033309302,0.0000029255607,0.000040371175,0.000008181302,0.000001401102,0.000008509252,0.00039224527,0.000029107096,0.000011654897,0.9963399,0.0013536975,0.0018085939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006804158,0.0000075540675,0.00023670644,0.000055934874,0.000002550051,0.000029394705,0.0003314822,0.000109984394,0.000040243107,0.9286035,0.070571154,0.0000047041576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00281186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00183965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013395257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006260723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037486723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04542494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561345718","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqw005","title":"The Philosophy of Design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Beauty; Philosophy of design; Architecture; Ontology; Sociology; Point (geometry); Designtheory; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Computer science; Mathematics; Western philosophy; Human–computer interaction; Art; Artificial intelligence; Visual arts","score_opus":0.03689493187008294,"score_gpt":0.2534597891875305,"score_spread":0.21656485731744754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561345718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004068295,0.07339961,0.15126027,0.057292342,0.0028473064,0.0002181195,0.00023352873,0.00039449512,0.710286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5435634,0.08337136,0.13701667,0.033538543,0.0049463343,0.0020240666,0.000446138,0.0006449734,0.19444853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98279643,0.009880186,0.0009337004,0.0018127048,0.003900667,0.000676194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924601,0.0048476323,0.00037050573,0.0012884175,0.0006982844,0.0003350763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009183653,0.0013983932,0.0013693915,0.0023419333,0.00427512,0.013924531,0.0023483906,0.0049398504,0.0068408744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006916443,0.0008601959,0.0012061468,0.002481789,0.052139044,0.011152135,0.0058763367,0.00835502,0.0028062742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033859428,0.0000056030103,0.00003985583,0.0001009523,0.000006406355,0.000016898792,0.001178103,0.00022908709,0.000037855738,0.98780173,0.0051280623,0.005451978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001114233,0.000018161196,0.00006078748,0.0003499292,0.0000050192393,0.0001071221,0.000693728,0.0004472143,0.00008446816,0.67609805,0.32211378,0.0000106064745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034785876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002161677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013924531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00955837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007020044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06935114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582900989","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqw088","title":"The Fall and Hypertime","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Literal (mathematical logic); Doctrine; Philosophy; Fall of man; Original sin; Paleoanthropology; Epistemology; Evolutionary theory; History; Law; Theology; Linguistics; Archaeology; Political science","score_opus":0.01442560234657719,"score_gpt":0.2356995691440028,"score_spread":0.22127396679742561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582900989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029167745,0.036261108,0.013408062,0.06399479,0.006905566,0.000024438512,0.00011007356,0.00014881026,0.84997946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7674622,0.008153193,0.00285679,0.0156105505,0.0035784706,0.00006515919,0.00013139303,0.00018792127,0.20195429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885094,0.00046511227,0.000029824767,0.00018922942,0.00022832086,0.00023662341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993168,0.00030995064,0.0000696763,0.00010647241,0.00009655771,0.00010051451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010586441,0.00039148083,0.00034856706,0.0008349184,0.0040193712,0.005324525,0.00066467625,0.001572734,0.010853197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002150633,0.0001619576,0.00031678434,0.00072225794,0.021918284,0.006163647,0.0038492572,0.003699515,0.0012947916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015047374,0.00000441669,0.00020736434,0.0000161513,0.000002028784,0.00006515041,0.0019411452,0.000041845928,0.00003939505,0.97691536,0.013735762,0.0070164343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007845696,0.000020590736,0.00041046593,0.00009265828,0.0000031241646,0.0001895536,0.0026705135,0.00014169546,0.00011270238,0.519817,0.47652504,0.000008889448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005843132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007464758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010853197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031112793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017014926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036307573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604204779","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqx019","title":"Socrates and Self-Knowledge","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; SOCRATES; Self-knowledge; Socratic method; Philosophy; Epistemology; Constitution; Introspection; Key (lock); Computer science; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.046489371775394445,"score_gpt":0.26724597122579885,"score_spread":0.2207565994504044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604204779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012720206,0.027368352,0.005793865,0.017169526,0.0013262624,0.000026417487,0.000036478214,0.00004693178,0.935512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8663678,0.023497242,0.0029198823,0.0056351703,0.0025646319,0.000076366385,0.00009844842,0.00008390119,0.09875658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997449,0.0012522108,0.00010863476,0.00020906536,0.0006277895,0.00035322047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998072,0.0009470814,0.00027608205,0.00022659656,0.00024922012,0.00022902635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021443958,0.0004173251,0.0003856132,0.0019500683,0.003013369,0.007322099,0.0006644723,0.0015229661,0.007208037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037951877,0.00018888064,0.00033292978,0.0018620888,0.033488955,0.0066486415,0.0029079306,0.0031930034,0.0012309396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003985487,0.0000033382478,0.00004878232,0.000039415972,0.0000013110547,0.000022675915,0.0039243703,0.00003280739,0.000013655563,0.989288,0.0024699457,0.004151731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067248693,0.000017541206,0.00049666397,0.0004398768,0.0000042061693,0.00018698863,0.004622021,0.00016340359,0.0001307402,0.6044222,0.38949788,0.000011788598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034745669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030348976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007322099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049839225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032798452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036161005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749192079","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqx045","title":"The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life's Biggest Questions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Pessimism; Pleasure; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04575332984713758,"score_gpt":0.3141277224600933,"score_spread":0.2683743926129557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749192079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023014096,0.34076566,0.027749859,0.41762584,0.022638358,0.00017356913,0.00060870044,0.00042036368,0.18771628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10040155,0.2537389,0.032117747,0.30351573,0.0693705,0.0014617777,0.0010288466,0.0018500296,0.23651496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778336,0.0015501977,0.000058390695,0.00014066248,0.0003120552,0.00015525495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949727,0.0039002742,0.00013341618,0.00023921063,0.00040167087,0.00035270027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034086946,0.0019055043,0.0010930138,0.0029474853,0.0045986148,0.009077305,0.0030234738,0.0072260187,0.01235588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077182925,0.0005121529,0.00063237944,0.0028548352,0.018317994,0.015526583,0.005312946,0.016345218,0.0064849444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003132467,0.000063141764,0.00017497361,0.00019252772,0.00000972001,0.00018164418,0.009566214,0.00020553666,0.00014425341,0.52552754,0.42782268,0.036080536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073123565,0.000011965594,0.00009464766,0.00047783906,0.0000014263986,0.0001205724,0.0029397616,0.0001692781,0.000036106958,0.20643932,0.78968877,0.000013053798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044812784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006459149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01235588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004023254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026705526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04133457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910550699","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqy060","title":"The Functions of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Jurisprudence; Function (biology); Positivism; Natural order; Comparative law; Private law; Scientific law; Positive law; Sociology; Black letter law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03335237354130844,"score_gpt":0.30559520641080123,"score_spread":0.2722428328694928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910550699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011928767,0.013495598,0.116493404,0.05016496,0.0012795758,0.00011795331,0.00024949745,0.00038655783,0.8058837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8847752,0.0073891855,0.028187519,0.0098397825,0.0019676178,0.0004915972,0.0003043601,0.00034444206,0.06670034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98909956,0.0056931986,0.0004567277,0.0017626601,0.0019268808,0.0010608669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99136263,0.0045911144,0.00055266055,0.0020163273,0.0009891483,0.00048821006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00844875,0.001006065,0.00074028794,0.003409793,0.00572519,0.01687298,0.0026312484,0.0059457263,0.009493189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013488069,0.00061236374,0.0009253192,0.0019074887,0.069713645,0.026741046,0.008515498,0.0062869224,0.0026158267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013508826,0.0000010983719,0.0000365075,0.000009709348,8.197011e-7,0.0000071321024,0.0004823632,0.00003088348,0.000016336306,0.9968959,0.00074946653,0.00176851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033355752,0.000008066149,0.00011501734,0.00006325981,0.0000027860447,0.00004602903,0.0005192979,0.0001863982,0.000058033864,0.9284193,0.0705725,0.0000059971576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003413744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015769401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01687298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007719502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056009173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910931407","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqy069","title":"Knowledge and Truth in Plato: Stepping Past the Shadow of Socrates","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Object (grammar); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Shadow (psychology); SOCRATES; GRASP; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.043877356039219884,"score_gpt":0.25860106007849365,"score_spread":0.21472370403927377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910931407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027547076,0.07099436,0.016881466,0.33998662,0.0059417267,0.000025195768,0.00009088639,0.000119406395,0.5384133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355245,0.014921846,0.003719471,0.01754632,0.0045582512,0.000037502872,0.000035471676,0.00014150036,0.023514966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699557,0.0019650923,0.000065368586,0.000247326,0.00039249033,0.00033421812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640286,0.002616764,0.00019719011,0.0002255627,0.0002927275,0.00026494396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003958706,0.0005124027,0.00056293013,0.002004802,0.007056525,0.010114525,0.0006668955,0.0031007696,0.003995095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005812212,0.00035739542,0.00037144774,0.0015047594,0.04628511,0.017165104,0.003459343,0.006801393,0.00063179986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000933971,0.0000045720763,0.00004463118,0.000019218216,0.0000014472354,0.000036908637,0.005977338,0.000068398236,0.00001535526,0.9823194,0.0076636514,0.0038397766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056290314,0.000008924553,0.00012495981,0.00012589402,0.0000025171105,0.000051448536,0.0030445962,0.000316283,0.00007913261,0.8777889,0.11843935,0.00001233649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009003203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009900981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010114525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061485353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031162866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044610918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012377090","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa007","title":"Epistemic Judgement and Motivation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Judgement; Epistemology; Doxastic logic; Expressivism; Normative; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12314749931926806,"score_gpt":0.252096904582415,"score_spread":0.12894940526314697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012377090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19593617,0.0013290189,0.11875629,0.036735803,0.00063274254,0.000110894296,0.00016780107,0.0001452865,0.64618605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99386036,0.00015378797,0.002639467,0.0006131137,0.00010575138,0.000023403161,0.000024517976,0.000016952943,0.0025624915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992668,0.004144007,0.00029508845,0.0009284613,0.0012216062,0.0007428399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875985,0.0068287696,0.0012788939,0.0014071134,0.0019994185,0.00088729704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008134536,0.00031870915,0.0005836285,0.0013650462,0.002138136,0.005487148,0.0008020947,0.0027450768,0.006504507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022370933,0.00027631724,0.00065847335,0.0008020351,0.023057407,0.006725945,0.0050667436,0.004163396,0.00060265674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010836569,0.000013337728,0.0003468941,0.00003293296,0.000006377043,0.00003125172,0.0010116796,0.00021499433,0.00016628642,0.9952722,0.00042310497,0.0024702689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075453563,0.000009762993,0.00041359046,0.00003402427,0.0000041906296,0.000029874012,0.00042242222,0.0005305056,0.00009829946,0.99504787,0.003392179,0.000009703094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010131728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000686752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008134536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002788885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015544514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04302001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112341774","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa079","title":"Avicenna on the Ontology of Pure Quiddity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09253165000198514,"score_gpt":0.2411898041389779,"score_spread":0.14865815413699274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112341774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007028941,0.092427194,0.009133869,0.053379342,0.00170704,0.000016401842,0.00018584171,0.000076729775,0.83604467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57592493,0.04989122,0.0074616265,0.010244099,0.0019558396,0.00011988694,0.0002466046,0.00025314992,0.35390264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913484,0.00040194148,0.000022736618,0.0001327585,0.00018506641,0.0001226465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995648,0.00018415725,0.000027208724,0.000067185974,0.00011559908,0.00004108861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011454261,0.00042140073,0.00046047068,0.0010806991,0.004264096,0.0037106427,0.00056019844,0.0015379068,0.009542727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016237716,0.00029240275,0.0003749548,0.0013080494,0.012280781,0.0055462285,0.0025379139,0.0026752774,0.0019366662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042248557,0.0000020790062,0.000027703647,0.000014644576,0.0000014708883,0.0000137521365,0.0006873135,0.000041104995,0.000032478638,0.9807365,0.015104928,0.0033337404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003012738,0.0000024619335,0.00026395568,0.00011449469,0.0000026429825,0.00004544717,0.0003289466,0.00013696283,0.00006468463,0.6167703,0.38226095,0.000006141404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036774665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045092292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036774665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007976358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002497722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07312125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114594491","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa078","title":"Against ‘Good for’/‘Well-Being’, for ‘Simply Good’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Value (mathematics); Form of the Good; Naturalism; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.056050156438669715,"score_gpt":0.26181518939233955,"score_spread":0.20576503295366982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114594491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039727084,0.0042516585,0.025055962,0.14248708,0.0020002748,0.00005592026,0.000068255766,0.00006294981,0.78629076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639079,0.00086592586,0.0029357572,0.015359291,0.0006142603,0.000062057115,0.000028740038,0.00007149408,0.016154474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841043,0.010148405,0.000412153,0.0014488602,0.0028752182,0.0010110477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901182,0.0045155347,0.0012532724,0.0009446524,0.0024534888,0.0007148682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011225772,0.00058373786,0.0007544718,0.001403719,0.003522605,0.009548453,0.0011880615,0.0045806123,0.0057857684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015181361,0.00022010862,0.00045449132,0.000940244,0.052422266,0.008845214,0.0044787815,0.0075296564,0.001115511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117930085,0.0000055236515,0.00009395936,0.00002486282,0.0000052279875,0.0000249509,0.0021394321,0.000036399648,0.00007486151,0.9933008,0.0027303447,0.001551737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012312929,0.000024348466,0.00055355794,0.00023795314,0.000015997808,0.00009033198,0.0054501635,0.00022892482,0.00042293983,0.9063247,0.08661856,0.000020234678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00213432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018807093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011225772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038063957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028511025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059368253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198426879","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqab047","title":"Practical Structure and Moral Skill","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Moral disengagement; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12465736986139654,"score_gpt":0.3208106594756913,"score_spread":0.1961532896142948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198426879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49718672,0.0006325614,0.036013935,0.008802878,0.00006141836,0.000056214805,0.000066750814,0.000053758282,0.45712575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571157,0.00009411593,0.002500627,0.00013424546,0.000009207389,0.000014372064,0.000017856342,0.000005451484,0.0015124812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834037,0.0007816518,0.000057190387,0.00019155513,0.00047596724,0.0001532096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362284,0.0027794577,0.001250292,0.00065225543,0.0008321159,0.00086303765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017750063,0.00015366697,0.0001785583,0.0008022884,0.0010216964,0.0030721156,0.0005110557,0.0010340967,0.009146306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01464073,0.00015554273,0.0001302947,0.00037231258,0.012795079,0.0034750937,0.0035795404,0.0013893547,0.0006181396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032811346,0.00010127611,0.0067354636,0.0000696799,0.000014803867,0.00010681241,0.004391929,0.0016817563,0.0010897765,0.96699667,0.0009419491,0.017836982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000186933,0.00006520249,0.013043266,0.00008252898,0.000006057689,0.00013277378,0.0027259982,0.0024992523,0.00047414357,0.96877396,0.012160094,0.00001791419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058491854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078545406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009146306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001542208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030597448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213619021","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqab058","title":"Between Deflationism and Inflationism: A Moderate View on Truth and Reference","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Skepticism; Variety (cybernetics); Contrast (vision); Order (exchange); Reductionism; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Linguistics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05948249579671331,"score_gpt":0.31985352538190714,"score_spread":0.2603710295851938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213619021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30152196,0.0037005418,0.20991501,0.06381123,0.0006310079,0.00008942915,0.0002346399,0.00024670456,0.4198494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343395,0.0001957192,0.004178466,0.0006989043,0.00020749394,0.00003778363,0.000026052898,0.000026760381,0.0011949821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938214,0.0030329325,0.00028135758,0.0007267343,0.0016364517,0.0005010922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99022126,0.005857401,0.0008538104,0.0014376283,0.0010557041,0.00057420024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006148998,0.00028367856,0.0009034516,0.0024602155,0.0021245629,0.005761697,0.0010729046,0.0026757086,0.0042008734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011242197,0.00036946315,0.0007935317,0.0013843528,0.019360125,0.011849386,0.005780115,0.0061150296,0.00040168126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022129907,0.0000060252896,0.00017490501,0.000011213158,0.0000030331664,0.000016032342,0.0006286183,0.000088854045,0.0001315346,0.9975013,0.000205684,0.0012105287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014349723,0.000012667053,0.0002264492,0.00001815157,0.000004771693,0.00002862522,0.00034157364,0.0006963704,0.00011954437,0.99586797,0.0026636613,0.0000058995975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011042273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009180055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006148998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030987496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012373491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0325194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215183218","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqab054","title":"Mapping the Visual Icon","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Iconicity; Icon; Perception; Cognitive science; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09512493333080047,"score_gpt":0.35742491383681047,"score_spread":0.26229998050601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215183218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13868465,0.002042989,0.19853531,0.003794176,0.000830346,0.000119594915,0.0002082592,0.0008402464,0.6549444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655995,0.00056677754,0.021342577,0.00040533682,0.00012692502,0.00004524706,0.000109717876,0.00011243529,0.011691504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944526,0.00024035697,0.000017576716,0.00011828274,0.000112826565,0.00006558873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983871,0.00076450896,0.00011256522,0.00036784634,0.00026308384,0.000104915416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006916569,0.00039932574,0.00020600113,0.001554128,0.00055425905,0.004807124,0.0008969256,0.00084438367,0.013038941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005451547,0.00019704537,0.00027030052,0.00067508355,0.008932546,0.0049980404,0.0028414773,0.0013001491,0.0009996607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013453425,0.000024126137,0.0012955398,0.00023483514,0.000015516898,0.00030369792,0.012588326,0.0011209066,0.0056364173,0.9165083,0.0036401495,0.058497548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034525045,0.00023314869,0.0063741403,0.00037248345,0.000036522935,0.0011144546,0.010353624,0.007604201,0.007572739,0.80269176,0.16353887,0.000073463256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013167333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064115634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013038941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010992681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004477582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043619573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249685392","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv129","title":"Wittgenstein and Heidegger","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Intelligibility (philosophy); Proposition","score_opus":0.029920841909729216,"score_gpt":0.21226436183350936,"score_spread":0.18234351992378015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249685392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0136770755,0.12714288,0.0041544507,0.23542634,0.006392571,0.000025285519,0.00010057104,0.000108975546,0.61297184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5186015,0.053069364,0.0035430898,0.07305063,0.0059349625,0.00010867101,0.00015823246,0.0004179656,0.34511557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986846,0.0004323256,0.000039950784,0.0003110897,0.00031212953,0.000219866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924576,0.00038720912,0.0000671635,0.000091364665,0.00012879813,0.00007974281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015603877,0.00054051186,0.00043045118,0.0016188818,0.0038720383,0.005366311,0.0006132474,0.004118512,0.009092719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050321897,0.00035602055,0.0003263863,0.0017523266,0.014534124,0.010247248,0.0018201814,0.004090779,0.0020446545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010864245,0.000010858217,0.00009269938,0.000022034335,0.000002730608,0.00004121065,0.0019873548,0.000035256966,0.00004039819,0.9212725,0.067412525,0.009071658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072923553,0.000009435164,0.00030537488,0.00021810313,0.0000039751135,0.00012446124,0.0017964464,0.000106150765,0.00018699067,0.48751163,0.509715,0.000015150195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006835016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070839543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009092719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004764796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017710422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03457117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249709255","doi":"10.1111/1467-9213.00303","title":"Book Reviews","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038221148472681245,"score_gpt":0.31640682278649024,"score_spread":0.278185674313809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249709255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041211082,0.21168758,0.0012973468,0.03436684,0.07362944,0.00022148817,0.0040307576,0.0009922328,0.6733623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002889085,0.11477234,0.0011030113,0.018457469,0.029233297,0.00014304266,0.004202989,0.00069153396,0.8285073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980793,0.0002099712,0.00013614907,0.00031515272,0.0011098062,0.0001496469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612087,0.0007333853,0.00024377591,0.00032547174,0.0019988802,0.00057759095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008844344,0.0010930904,0.001451621,0.0045507858,0.0012257665,0.0078674825,0.0023304138,0.0034774393,0.5136518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006970443,0.0005222318,0.0009252125,0.005060481,0.0008826955,0.004746035,0.002220185,0.0030520468,0.4382433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010052763,0.000013281955,0.0000302924,0.00047972435,0.000004043708,0.000041801675,0.000028526607,0.000029292132,0.00008341473,0.0024183523,0.92972577,0.06713546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021387664,0.000004265408,0.000042664677,0.00025018526,0.0000022398779,0.000083747,0.000018709072,0.0000060106413,0.000018489976,0.00050010264,0.99906904,0.0000024546157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023932434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032580362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5136518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024915435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039037254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69371665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294714117","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqac043","title":"Are There Non-Propositional Implicatures?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Implicature; Grice; Utterance; Irony; Philosophy; Linguistics; Ambivalence; Content (measure theory); Counterfactual conditional; Counterfactual thinking; Pragmatics; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.02460427934318292,"score_gpt":0.29586172598089133,"score_spread":0.2712574466377084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294714117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32188916,0.0057668397,0.18390937,0.09083336,0.0014358908,0.00010276435,0.00051859557,0.0009903206,0.39455366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985598,0.00046143783,0.007638277,0.0012669414,0.0002141698,0.000027872216,0.00009661743,0.00008333011,0.004613388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969312,0.0012552402,0.00017677352,0.00067245786,0.0006113067,0.00035298124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209607,0.0044158506,0.000674898,0.0012486507,0.0012598376,0.00030469944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051925373,0.00067273615,0.00067085127,0.0011811559,0.0023127857,0.0065336516,0.001900665,0.0030138702,0.007991744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013893368,0.00081723905,0.00068789016,0.0009044093,0.01683485,0.017056411,0.0033606854,0.0056159287,0.0011071328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006941785,0.000035019948,0.0011742073,0.00012162049,0.000021618192,0.00065608684,0.008974899,0.00013789862,0.0011955878,0.9776594,0.0016854042,0.008268955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002624434,0.000025806477,0.0013641404,0.00013517465,0.00003519139,0.00058686116,0.0066954987,0.0013680756,0.0012854878,0.9638246,0.02461752,0.000035307166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017268264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010760106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007991744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019215187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011648462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027461052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298226323","doi":"10.1111/1467-9213.12003","title":"Totality and Infinity at 50. Edited By ScottDavidson and DianePerpich. (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press, 2012. Pp. x + 310. Price £21.99 pb.)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Infinity; Philosophy; Relation (database); Loyalty; Theology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027067288498912774,"score_gpt":0.21896355970525555,"score_spread":0.19189627120634278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298226323","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088165246,0.71128225,0.0012753261,0.023282487,0.007048792,0.00001740147,0.00038889516,0.00013277162,0.2556905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044595,0.41196454,0.0016659833,0.0071517574,0.0077737905,0.00012144398,0.00079489435,0.000515869,0.52541673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956256,0.00013024981,0.000024737928,0.0000743346,0.00013626991,0.00007175107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995933,0.00016771258,0.000041568863,0.000033347762,0.000103622144,0.000060406765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060309895,0.0018409183,0.0007531209,0.0024377494,0.0023694693,0.005783733,0.0011563667,0.0015918419,0.040441487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014082273,0.0007359227,0.00068173354,0.0030678632,0.0034607437,0.0068262108,0.002458765,0.0028914476,0.015838575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024335151,0.000020118103,0.00016704941,0.0004125812,0.000007889466,0.000110757566,0.0035600215,0.00009198988,0.000109075474,0.1268623,0.81101257,0.057621226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027214232,0.000003804282,0.0003517024,0.00046166038,0.0000023698537,0.00013347973,0.0008611785,0.00002468837,0.00003638447,0.022830524,0.9752864,0.000005048735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01163743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023019407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040441487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035273214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032187125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13529027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309223137","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqac071","title":"No Work for Fundamental Facts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Common ground; Philosophy; Theoretical physics; Physics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.040231575798912976,"score_gpt":0.30707317092592934,"score_spread":0.2668415951270164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309223137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03232708,0.01173426,0.046733502,0.36971366,0.0062439702,0.00006587943,0.00026156608,0.00034082387,0.5325793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88395107,0.0046424256,0.013624252,0.03350182,0.003776278,0.00013481456,0.00024427485,0.00042861758,0.059696414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959686,0.0017818047,0.00014012626,0.00090496044,0.00080480677,0.00039974067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98371387,0.0088810045,0.00067202136,0.003802403,0.0017940985,0.0011366216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009141894,0.0005913256,0.000985435,0.0014117212,0.004644113,0.0062639364,0.0019562943,0.0051799463,0.024953835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023287619,0.0004206935,0.00086691475,0.00060911564,0.028769739,0.022295227,0.004696054,0.010620843,0.0032035003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015905765,0.000014696211,0.00012334264,0.00003155695,0.0000062412687,0.00003360254,0.0007851307,0.00005455802,0.00005643533,0.9883575,0.0063528637,0.0041682273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010314148,0.000008678362,0.000076039614,0.00008883829,0.000005005938,0.000031924345,0.00045381085,0.00016673408,0.000096580414,0.95072114,0.04833462,0.0000062686636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015069182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017168123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024953835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039701685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027155327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08347893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321372119","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad015","title":"On the Epistemic Significance of Perceptual Structure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Epistemology; Feature (linguistics); Reflection (computer programming); Field (mathematics); Cognitive science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.036897899751795,"score_gpt":0.2981722363906613,"score_spread":0.26127433663886634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321372119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21694934,0.0034352115,0.3325446,0.055134285,0.0005921876,0.00006910119,0.00022429583,0.00020326856,0.39084762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938344,0.00032481016,0.004168724,0.00035640755,0.000121743076,0.000016408816,0.000022587721,0.000016707894,0.001138358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958728,0.002483484,0.00015584733,0.0004750859,0.00072822394,0.0002845979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711285,0.02170029,0.0014330511,0.0026307267,0.0024727085,0.00063476776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059608286,0.00032742726,0.00048527395,0.0015295102,0.0022468753,0.005290739,0.0011207088,0.0026815163,0.0047339173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02960702,0.00042928662,0.0004921272,0.00069350033,0.02348805,0.009531547,0.005008333,0.0034956848,0.0003741582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027084396,0.000011926065,0.00024818146,0.000054340915,0.000008129932,0.000102045,0.0020858725,0.00048451987,0.0003441745,0.99329376,0.00036180805,0.002978142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070454457,0.0000070752603,0.00020922451,0.00003107307,0.0000064015057,0.00004577239,0.00036279767,0.0010313769,0.0001382664,0.9964335,0.0017200346,0.0000074171294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012876887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079489395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059608286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020855176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011774057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03152424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362548770","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad041","title":"Shared Agency and Mutual Obligations: A Pluralist Account","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Agency (philosophy); Pooling; Law and economics; Virtue; Business; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06615503103286743,"score_gpt":0.2844559561807754,"score_spread":0.21830092514790797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362548770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11186545,0.0014334965,0.17771457,0.035763014,0.00033081553,0.00012399361,0.000074695854,0.00010236514,0.6725915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868008,0.00016769147,0.0068213576,0.0008227508,0.00013290979,0.000073499985,0.000020254503,0.0000228353,0.0051380335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.975994,0.013610049,0.00091907405,0.0026270384,0.0051596873,0.0016902094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886107,0.0043882504,0.0015725746,0.0021732263,0.0018197703,0.0014354208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01900972,0.00046954298,0.0007637019,0.0015139413,0.0075259516,0.0073181833,0.0020259733,0.0039461283,0.0054039927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014772966,0.00054066256,0.000890971,0.00089146046,0.036041092,0.014547776,0.013250381,0.0044960403,0.0005505463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067769006,0.000009023496,0.00016067273,0.00001244605,0.000004731572,0.000031511623,0.0022775768,0.0002065122,0.00007192496,0.99579203,0.00030932078,0.0011174505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010617942,0.000006838194,0.00016669065,0.00002447495,0.0000043040477,0.000036024565,0.00068051915,0.00080392027,0.000066080036,0.9913265,0.0068660784,0.000007924823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027352949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002538764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01900972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063163694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045460835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10053426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366332519","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad047","title":"Response to LÖhr: Why We Still Need a New Normativism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13763127660680427,"score_gpt":0.3091230974619306,"score_spread":0.17149182085512635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366332519","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068251044,0.0012249534,0.00058549014,0.9932643,0.0021902719,0.0000026775476,0.0000082746,0.000013973479,0.002027544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11240241,0.0021973164,0.0028844285,0.86833984,0.008259429,0.00008114714,0.000023708675,0.00011674918,0.0056949854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9707636,0.020387905,0.0008658197,0.002430515,0.0044916635,0.0010604472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92380375,0.05645736,0.00238385,0.0041652555,0.0099991355,0.0031907079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038757775,0.0005601331,0.0012282161,0.00096438813,0.0043349806,0.0068182857,0.0032334446,0.020288106,0.0049317502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09045345,0.00037366935,0.0006991399,0.00077670807,0.03189924,0.017020073,0.006078418,0.033533778,0.0019681351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008778876,0.000043569016,0.00029071048,0.0001634958,0.000018060466,0.00021072588,0.008141383,0.00016180136,0.00027025942,0.54084224,0.43359882,0.016171167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007301867,0.000050057613,0.0006304525,0.00067721104,0.000014723705,0.00035621074,0.013613342,0.00056801876,0.0005706722,0.5065532,0.4767873,0.00010574461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036014242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029288284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038757775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048177615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038735154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20497316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377967813","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad053","title":"Degrees of Epistemic Criticizability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Normative; Criticism; Rationality; Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Epistemic virtue; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Virtue; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11664729969934759,"score_gpt":0.2987964625216315,"score_spread":0.1821491628222839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377967813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40680268,0.0006873094,0.3453475,0.009232214,0.00034749196,0.0002566662,0.00029545647,0.00062777376,0.23640293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908731,0.00006742213,0.006400721,0.00017223971,0.000056161105,0.000052385414,0.00003757251,0.000042307853,0.0022980927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9653499,0.016037462,0.0029806085,0.0037227168,0.009652158,0.002257182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88729525,0.054677155,0.0126504125,0.019959677,0.022200737,0.0032167127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019163424,0.000731609,0.00095256243,0.0047855712,0.0023989312,0.008139648,0.0015886417,0.0027794326,0.0055090655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10291298,0.0005573181,0.0011461732,0.0018298668,0.016598867,0.0099125095,0.006714655,0.003629004,0.0005344564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008579529,0.000028748404,0.0072016576,0.00008987531,0.00007291448,0.000119642296,0.003579336,0.0043754703,0.0013689008,0.96896523,0.0008043601,0.013308038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013322983,0.00002831115,0.0018887534,0.000055399203,0.00002730551,0.00008718037,0.000787843,0.0051254584,0.000673947,0.9878135,0.0034692313,0.000029909379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018045763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010645762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019163424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035659636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013222875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10134709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378651348","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad055","title":"Attribution and Explanation in Relativism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Attribution; Epistemology; Philosophy; Nonsense; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10490703284357576,"score_gpt":0.28338271502863105,"score_spread":0.17847568218505527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378651348","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094017155,0.0065683,0.5888609,0.08219189,0.0025891536,0.00015677861,0.00029597626,0.0005036599,0.22481619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97837615,0.0007316082,0.016726622,0.0011060695,0.00076704676,0.00007403539,0.00008110411,0.000062166706,0.0020750635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98526484,0.00958039,0.0006626931,0.0015176373,0.0023747436,0.00059970847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743834,0.016907265,0.0020959997,0.0036225282,0.0024566634,0.0005341028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017568562,0.0005651149,0.0009498807,0.0040228753,0.002848518,0.006644574,0.0017497387,0.0038704332,0.0062606223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034868248,0.0005455836,0.0013134956,0.002646216,0.03578939,0.014057996,0.0063219503,0.0050909324,0.0005156108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007803854,0.000006357668,0.0001612076,0.000029028204,0.000008818116,0.00002181406,0.000983535,0.0003132494,0.000043079577,0.9961357,0.00032807345,0.0019611958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006944365,0.0000035714565,0.00009971179,0.000022809338,0.0000050450362,0.000015203876,0.00020959102,0.00056501705,0.000050405615,0.9968148,0.0022018778,0.0000050565823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001885453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006236617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017568562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004896146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002437586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092912555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380204502","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad059","title":"The Essential Berkeley and Neo-Berkeley","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Classics; Environmental ethics; Art history; Library science; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.047042627083861366,"score_gpt":0.269722702647228,"score_spread":0.2226800755633666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380204502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008144897,0.07679998,0.00861038,0.10515015,0.004676233,0.000019020094,0.00025462173,0.00022428049,0.79612046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71936834,0.043049928,0.0052714744,0.018096019,0.0072955606,0.00008030476,0.00029019982,0.0003566778,0.20619154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788874,0.00087222725,0.00007722079,0.00019985664,0.000701705,0.00026025236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969602,0.0013653144,0.0002786567,0.00038195596,0.00062936597,0.0003843634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025696787,0.00037897142,0.00045179788,0.0019872738,0.003050463,0.0065486394,0.00068012613,0.0016010908,0.016839465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006528645,0.00024772814,0.0003579079,0.0017828845,0.013871284,0.0062511186,0.0036077762,0.0032916337,0.002258204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014174429,0.000008089397,0.00015599972,0.000074730866,0.0000026932798,0.000020445017,0.0007246882,0.0000505342,0.00003399212,0.9512249,0.036128324,0.011561582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009100902,0.0000071501076,0.0006666305,0.0003720882,0.000005757784,0.000086448475,0.0007534341,0.00017252052,0.000105458676,0.5908446,0.4069674,0.00000941565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056136823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045769718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016839465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005213761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052404846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05633366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387541980","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad099","title":"Work Hours, Free Time, and Economic Output","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; Queen's University; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; University of Ottawa; University of Hong Kong; Princeton University","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Perfectionism (psychology); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; State (computer science); Positive economics; Work (physics); Economics; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.060605162117082285,"score_gpt":0.35163709819904077,"score_spread":0.2910319360819585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387541980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8480062,0.002908484,0.0020755415,0.009046744,0.00015257574,0.000017464898,0.00074324064,0.000020589065,0.13702923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963297,0.0003563015,0.00010844448,0.000096144955,0.00013030725,0.000004433051,0.00006318282,0.0000049043765,0.0029066245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991848,0.00036200305,0.000034597942,0.000059463855,0.0002381389,0.00012110397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98630875,0.007913015,0.0024708016,0.0004891754,0.0009160605,0.0019022903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014464897,0.00016032034,0.0001844763,0.001312365,0.00076926174,0.0033112876,0.0007384155,0.0005088465,0.018279983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009617624,0.00008863988,0.00017875197,0.0014121649,0.0026010356,0.0017821159,0.0017227755,0.00088351464,0.00083615043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053175085,0.00079099427,0.5574746,0.00032469336,0.00020791596,0.0004381595,0.0077593336,0.0048213364,0.00065775565,0.36596024,0.012965584,0.04806761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030662308,0.00025130305,0.748322,0.0003566799,0.000053444717,0.00022197283,0.016197432,0.0035986826,0.00042108243,0.2068164,0.023671381,0.000058980742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026402865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00286067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018279983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072874874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058719056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061152577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389454697","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad110","title":"A Phasalist Approach to Coincidence Puzzles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Coincidence; Statue; Theoretical physics; Computer science; Physics; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.09263951266982616,"score_gpt":0.31740319964807423,"score_spread":0.22476368697824806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389454697","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034462575,0.0011587685,0.7504455,0.01460857,0.00075998856,0.000072153925,0.00013609105,0.00033975573,0.1980167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8312495,0.0007233471,0.14357418,0.0017719768,0.0006108503,0.00015094242,0.00013462355,0.0001842068,0.021600448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760157,0.0010038014,0.00014030356,0.00045016326,0.0006381875,0.0001660521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973929,0.001202784,0.0002294479,0.000609771,0.0004268347,0.00013827157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034755412,0.00055711594,0.00086283794,0.0018346582,0.0021248024,0.0030486668,0.0022181103,0.0023227325,0.01689225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009489845,0.00044638853,0.001416071,0.0009978042,0.012945064,0.008705511,0.0054826564,0.004084338,0.0014898494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010100473,0.000005257933,0.000054888387,0.000018763183,0.0000045189695,0.000038998496,0.0002287313,0.00052774244,0.00013610334,0.9943869,0.0008238454,0.0037641835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010029192,0.000006379157,0.000032268195,0.000010118393,0.00000229296,0.00006871294,0.000111533926,0.0027674565,0.00012059198,0.99270284,0.0041620424,0.0000056492704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069514435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008759721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01689225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00159318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012893664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05651021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389986811","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad116","title":"Imagining Out of Hope","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wishful thinking; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0389328396481385,"score_gpt":0.3278720984421399,"score_spread":0.2889392587940014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389986811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33818242,0.006158625,0.09394378,0.032952365,0.0010814047,0.000087519344,0.00014538596,0.00020646119,0.52724206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933201,0.0005298269,0.002821489,0.00043085223,0.000052980595,0.000012853625,0.000017894472,0.000012484279,0.0028015217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983267,0.0012017915,0.00003555517,0.000078313,0.0002584419,0.000099054145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969779,0.0017596007,0.00031645928,0.0003126409,0.0003131425,0.0003202198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021306886,0.00033295836,0.00016871355,0.0006080988,0.0012076336,0.003233766,0.00046999415,0.0008832466,0.0038806184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053160414,0.00015690514,0.000414567,0.00028040822,0.015387382,0.004145974,0.0031739722,0.0025905308,0.00029880676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057999743,0.000042455744,0.0009861151,0.00015034166,0.000013836002,0.00030946787,0.048143774,0.00035448873,0.0022876055,0.93300587,0.0030305402,0.011617586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000315976,0.00012788795,0.0022473563,0.0002965065,0.000022344002,0.00070362457,0.03225337,0.0011077509,0.0017925682,0.8802807,0.08109832,0.000038036203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044192155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049476826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038806184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009218982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007259038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012981951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390352383","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad121","title":"Just Kidding? Two Roles for the Concept of Joking in Political Speech","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Utterance; Denial; Politics; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07932171114531744,"score_gpt":0.400574045486064,"score_spread":0.32125233434074657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390352383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30368024,0.011884337,0.10889294,0.065147825,0.0016660509,0.00012543761,0.00013843518,0.00019647442,0.50826836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952474,0.00030411637,0.002573577,0.00053355587,0.00024031446,0.000028906581,0.000009384709,0.000024841087,0.0010378625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988204,0.009113586,0.00029872122,0.0006953897,0.0010935265,0.00059470895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665608,0.025151085,0.0026085107,0.002413541,0.0018262358,0.0014398277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009499563,0.00041904606,0.00051135535,0.0021850804,0.0041169617,0.009219152,0.0013862178,0.0037711367,0.0040610437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023185123,0.00055174873,0.0003885662,0.0012242193,0.04779562,0.016134135,0.0065618027,0.0052462295,0.0003375188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006538376,0.000023030158,0.0009717377,0.000102376114,0.0000075199105,0.00009147263,0.067756616,0.00008587668,0.00053117785,0.924357,0.00067954615,0.0053282497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007882903,0.00014950304,0.006526965,0.0007370935,0.000047075988,0.0009982762,0.0977719,0.0020553153,0.0018955283,0.8256313,0.06395873,0.00014942423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010545026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094882416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009499563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022251224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012364944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050239086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391915558","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae018","title":"‘Just The Facts’: Thick Concepts and Hermeneutical Misfit","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06515080768230051,"score_gpt":0.3722786520254367,"score_spread":0.30712784434313617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391915558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51877254,0.004073896,0.14047095,0.06436658,0.0014506397,0.00016147042,0.00006874493,0.0001897509,0.27044544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371403,0.00018140097,0.0035163718,0.0007159893,0.00008553311,0.000028905266,0.000007338105,0.000034220182,0.0017162035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752245,0.018138206,0.00062153296,0.0012311442,0.0038153385,0.0009693636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96329653,0.02575921,0.003885876,0.0036718976,0.00257441,0.0008120627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025422262,0.00063729536,0.00053796946,0.0030222696,0.0063027847,0.011233884,0.0017620316,0.003537079,0.0026224162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045978274,0.0005393282,0.0003218818,0.0017171189,0.09896098,0.017038008,0.008862957,0.0066873627,0.00027542192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020887952,0.000016371547,0.0006104692,0.00003533756,0.000006553533,0.00020980915,0.15352729,0.00013335113,0.000383712,0.83976084,0.0007478669,0.004547466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013530219,0.000034647568,0.00089283095,0.00026801167,0.000010971451,0.00027554212,0.10734929,0.0012466643,0.0011258936,0.84637874,0.042367075,0.00003680221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015982724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015497406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025422262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056271264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027662157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1344474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394760713","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae029","title":"Direct acquaintance with intrinsic value","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Introspection; Feeling; Property (philosophy); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Perception; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06329429139780074,"score_gpt":0.27508761393347575,"score_spread":0.211793322535675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394760713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46739635,0.00062565267,0.093380846,0.0052814847,0.00028161108,0.00010815355,0.00014400031,0.00034263812,0.43243927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992428,0.000081387145,0.0037880458,0.00040655577,0.00004990631,0.000018697883,0.0000472956,0.000037310285,0.003142739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937342,0.0017707614,0.0003047314,0.0016573967,0.0021092645,0.00042380576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98114175,0.005165147,0.0030469138,0.005813975,0.0037575793,0.0010745289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030087924,0.00028423814,0.00036128063,0.0007614031,0.0012445706,0.003476286,0.0007855892,0.0010207376,0.010263399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026232269,0.00037602405,0.00036845595,0.0003711446,0.0062742685,0.004915753,0.004684034,0.003862371,0.0006431172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025484234,0.00041318036,0.039136905,0.00048643886,0.0002681542,0.002374659,0.051939063,0.0015432629,0.051556766,0.7660569,0.005915404,0.08005449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036507863,0.000531595,0.10088624,0.00035352525,0.00015559608,0.0029696852,0.00836817,0.00413056,0.023383604,0.81139594,0.047608323,0.00018023832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015550775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013722191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010263399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012125162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006598224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03433454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396871923","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae047","title":"Speaking of ‘violence’: Figleaf use in sexualized violence contexts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sexual violence; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05623364159936818,"score_gpt":0.3373225134910299,"score_spread":0.2810888718916617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396871923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6343456,0.0023851858,0.039075058,0.019177921,0.00060466834,0.00008792077,0.00014321449,0.00047506113,0.30370542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933536,0.0002453315,0.0017298174,0.0005804843,0.00004193406,0.000024951702,0.000022907845,0.0000910673,0.0039098836],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220794,0.0063742753,0.00011586617,0.0003244091,0.0006459249,0.00033153236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067605,0.006356739,0.0010676392,0.00077451713,0.0005340092,0.00059104385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045613633,0.0003860325,0.00035041806,0.0015346039,0.007966746,0.008367672,0.0012768727,0.0030127156,0.006250304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01063725,0.00034245665,0.00027128804,0.0012500362,0.01763131,0.008697852,0.0069750655,0.0029751528,0.000825204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037983064,0.000015327369,0.0013912122,0.00008356557,0.000005404815,0.00050849374,0.83587104,0.000067071815,0.0014081452,0.14813721,0.0022117705,0.010262711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007303777,0.00009727194,0.0032905058,0.00047135414,0.000013581298,0.0013345618,0.7636973,0.0008548281,0.0018619179,0.022416847,0.20590846,0.000046104225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027905698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031892462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008367672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024495195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078835455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024123073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399102349","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae058","title":"On the necessity of a pluralist theory of reparations for historical injustice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09956507770890535,"score_gpt":0.36338190596954456,"score_spread":0.26381682826063924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399102349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101515666,0.0024743904,0.22189952,0.14494851,0.0008769995,0.00022906042,0.00019292189,0.00031902708,0.5275439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97926563,0.00033295422,0.010768911,0.0034102346,0.00054443337,0.00011334626,0.00003491905,0.000060833492,0.0054687164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874641,0.0057443646,0.00072821334,0.0017966023,0.002837018,0.0014297253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725478,0.013854007,0.0030505348,0.0047806487,0.0042019105,0.0015651758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017138144,0.0006777731,0.0013945604,0.0038414726,0.007651777,0.00892196,0.0033803084,0.0101292785,0.007896951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019716842,0.0008920654,0.0020821334,0.0015296458,0.053489476,0.020974578,0.009267309,0.010474664,0.0009167665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005639888,0.000009201734,0.00007619509,0.00001042549,0.0000041797534,0.000039584,0.00055454887,0.0002203298,0.000024503675,0.9981844,0.00039229533,0.00047862556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009498456,0.0000066530974,0.000106019994,0.000024264504,0.0000047325243,0.000044323388,0.00032020948,0.0009830756,0.000038164577,0.995983,0.0024724668,0.00000765547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029441002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027582138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017138144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008462811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041278065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090636194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399501939","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae064","title":"Sceptical hypotheses and subjective indistinguishability","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Stipulation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029419507403158324,"score_gpt":0.3164241146487395,"score_spread":0.2870046072455812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399501939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32335177,0.0039496,0.2727273,0.049169894,0.0011106216,0.0001897394,0.00048038326,0.00023430315,0.34878644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99210405,0.00026572112,0.005144567,0.000869846,0.00021598236,0.00004676732,0.000077973076,0.000014708749,0.0012603439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230486,0.0040164874,0.00044939367,0.0008705789,0.001999023,0.00035968228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600214,0.026866011,0.0041371826,0.0039140075,0.0033784288,0.0016830309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00979675,0.0004406535,0.0006980877,0.003233534,0.0020250857,0.005503762,0.0021351918,0.00285061,0.0076982984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0377177,0.00034555912,0.0006720062,0.0013269975,0.04142401,0.009532551,0.0057564653,0.0046817646,0.0005089646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001696671,0.000012180521,0.00034894203,0.000033323693,0.0000078408875,0.000078095705,0.0009913523,0.0002023648,0.00007071735,0.996498,0.00031540866,0.0014247617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011667388,0.000008071427,0.00028898593,0.000027347502,0.0000026040886,0.00004694493,0.00036260355,0.00064906443,0.00006322229,0.99714714,0.0013863005,0.0000060004577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005664409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030301962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00979675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030285434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010523419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0518108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404793796","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae142","title":"Interpersonal hope and loving attention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.016821088623474017,"score_gpt":0.29473705478994805,"score_spread":0.277915966166474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404793796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66187066,0.0031230936,0.0073357616,0.017448489,0.00028176306,0.000033234188,0.000047522313,0.00008379635,0.30977577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879825,0.00016987728,0.00015961022,0.0001981239,0.000021248123,0.0000029924831,0.0000037779137,0.000002657172,0.00064350246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999059,0.00051555235,0.00002115882,0.000075934106,0.00015533043,0.0001729587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690646,0.0010532838,0.00077214895,0.00020557194,0.00021062663,0.0008520236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014024356,0.00016989394,0.0001800565,0.0006039442,0.001602468,0.00380373,0.00029285921,0.0008044779,0.0033060373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044204528,0.000120163284,0.00019398754,0.00025359314,0.006025192,0.0013677186,0.0035223337,0.0015862053,0.0001827912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027935655,0.00036257424,0.043956965,0.00032300697,0.00018547467,0.0015101002,0.109999835,0.0006826385,0.0042542326,0.7307245,0.011339321,0.09638192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107136664,0.0005728223,0.111585505,0.0005917004,0.00018961716,0.0019548268,0.10283713,0.001851558,0.0016475364,0.657209,0.12131163,0.00014163107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005061318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007615011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00380373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009948754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059883913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011059761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407109770","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaf014","title":"More Equal Than Others: Humans and the Rights of Other Animals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Animal rights; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.015202659048994843,"score_gpt":0.2583861579738381,"score_spread":0.24318349892484328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407109770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065387785,0.020357465,0.010950225,0.32722786,0.0014910275,0.000036827292,0.00007365995,0.00001963328,0.5744555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563102,0.0034102544,0.0018475394,0.018907398,0.0009961145,0.000057697987,0.000023038368,0.000031187028,0.018416548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99027234,0.0071008485,0.00016591245,0.00079802814,0.0008036357,0.00085926335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900719,0.0073682754,0.0004976094,0.0008945713,0.0005108686,0.0006568653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011379607,0.00045312959,0.00094686233,0.00084724964,0.008527289,0.010294567,0.0014506252,0.013528923,0.0070440406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010593545,0.00036867717,0.00059839926,0.0012256129,0.08685599,0.014411531,0.005040557,0.0093596745,0.00057603716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009947194,0.000012766507,0.00011850469,0.000014046882,0.000005704887,0.000039431347,0.0055398783,0.00006670735,0.00005649961,0.9901336,0.0022474774,0.0017554668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001593636,0.000009608193,0.00035155617,0.00005836994,0.000005978455,0.000055508954,0.0038863523,0.00007860064,0.00007620772,0.96192384,0.03352853,0.000009424852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066770357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076518897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013528923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036001718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037593173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060181856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407793948","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaf003","title":"Does the value of rational activity explain the badness of human extinction?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford","keywords":"Happiness; Utopia; Dystopia; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Value (mathematics); Object (grammar); Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.024957955975460477,"score_gpt":0.2676300319078894,"score_spread":0.24267207593242895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407793948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.154393,0.007297155,0.06594168,0.15517384,0.0007170522,0.000053216074,0.00016270552,0.00015614233,0.61610526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227154,0.0006337864,0.0012681163,0.0015759771,0.00015442721,0.000015846012,0.000014275678,0.000021408025,0.0040445942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984913,0.0008279929,0.000043401582,0.00021463848,0.00019691094,0.00022577697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947943,0.00254868,0.0006892647,0.0009573445,0.0006465454,0.00036385245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044958717,0.0003069317,0.00044125417,0.0008804414,0.0014455554,0.0041160253,0.0011755863,0.0031255332,0.008317493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007488377,0.00019923726,0.00059162633,0.00047991026,0.029456824,0.00619695,0.002704495,0.0027876163,0.0007543852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012178002,0.000009836001,0.00054559286,0.00002179053,0.000006962381,0.000035794706,0.00040293057,0.00070217747,0.000036949066,0.9955388,0.0009905581,0.0016963026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072939447,0.0000061544483,0.00041751403,0.000025721225,0.000004884474,0.00003533203,0.00033880796,0.0012289725,0.00004853662,0.9917331,0.00614811,0.000005516054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018999522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014134182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008317493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026157622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011358978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02782482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414451984","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaf084","title":"Hermeneutic decentering","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Relation (database); Hermeneutics; Phenomenon; Exposition (narrative)","score_opus":0.02794017645619367,"score_gpt":0.34455838881134127,"score_spread":0.3166182123551476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414451984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16781475,0.005546457,0.11609111,0.04956428,0.0016153122,0.00020038926,0.000079466154,0.00018120035,0.658907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805151,0.00057354884,0.0044086264,0.0018491433,0.0002123243,0.0000591371,0.000017451626,0.000048173904,0.012316617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96885747,0.02018935,0.0009057373,0.0025555573,0.00609327,0.0013987161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96132624,0.020337963,0.0038214377,0.009517514,0.0042294455,0.0007674962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030185647,0.0004802352,0.0007698041,0.001734725,0.0066958666,0.010548543,0.002033818,0.0030831704,0.004485931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054464895,0.00031360987,0.00036811363,0.0015489416,0.06379466,0.010808202,0.007406403,0.007059971,0.00063943723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010636113,0.000012163097,0.00043977064,0.000034690074,0.000003287099,0.00009948427,0.060301494,0.00009026705,0.00021343776,0.929525,0.0011454932,0.008124232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009562419,0.000042780815,0.0010861993,0.00048089336,0.000010969893,0.00048402068,0.04329805,0.00097162666,0.0013066235,0.69467425,0.25759307,0.000041886677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031492782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021442664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030185647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006365193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004023527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15963888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903487049","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaf033","title":"Consent theory as hermeneutical injustice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Informed consent; Feminist theory; Ethical theory; Feminism","score_opus":0.04677474804174056,"score_gpt":0.38095658337784144,"score_spread":0.3341818353361009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903487049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053206023,0.0058890386,0.22878444,0.10476955,0.0011915629,0.0003050638,0.00009988153,0.00010098077,0.60565335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97372425,0.0012356618,0.0092215175,0.0032382216,0.00039950636,0.00021387686,0.000020680578,0.000045763045,0.011900522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759517,0.018711004,0.00060503127,0.0011803897,0.0026070548,0.0009450216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715101,0.022325559,0.0014834787,0.0024680228,0.0016539658,0.00055897527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02431352,0.000560734,0.0005325043,0.0018868874,0.003957948,0.007380633,0.0020477518,0.005562574,0.005203431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023853602,0.00045179145,0.00080692396,0.001158601,0.093633175,0.011551516,0.0051811384,0.0070513277,0.00053800916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015400701,0.0000032583237,0.000034495606,0.0000073569327,6.418639e-7,0.000016534008,0.0011171254,0.00006977681,0.0000140460215,0.9982589,0.000113384296,0.0003629327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007288113,0.000007241962,0.00005139556,0.000046705412,0.0000021021754,0.00004908686,0.00085068645,0.00041354302,0.000071081944,0.9904951,0.0080006225,0.0000051761644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026581895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012918814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02431352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064067617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005178556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12858373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}