{"meta":{"query_hash":"4d610b598cc8","filters":{"venue":"The Philosophical Review"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4d610b598cc8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Philosophical+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1971274375","doi":"10.1215/00318108-110-2-291","title":"THE NEW DIALECTIC: CONVERSATIONAL CONTEXTS OF ARGUMENT; AD HOMINEM ARGUMENTS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Citation; Download; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06217263187437377,"score_gpt":0.2968226115447535,"score_spread":0.2346499796703797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971274375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007362714,0.9611477,0.00090626394,0.01599005,0.0019829303,0.0000071432855,0.000027134362,0.000019194593,0.019846011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010236385,0.9422781,0.0015389924,0.0076799877,0.0067731394,0.000081606326,0.00012187146,0.00005533062,0.031234663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535227,0.002573351,0.00015562258,0.00037455998,0.0013727379,0.00017136992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958615,0.002611763,0.00035897724,0.00020580187,0.00070557726,0.00025650125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030090185,0.0014259755,0.0015150815,0.0064892746,0.0016381183,0.007734232,0.0015518257,0.0041361516,0.014254371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00726187,0.0007405031,0.0006029839,0.009527079,0.010912029,0.013194674,0.0022661036,0.006584823,0.006191417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028968718,0.000024885298,0.00013669369,0.0032968356,0.000048932965,0.000099163706,0.0012417194,0.00021801946,0.00019740986,0.23807305,0.6200544,0.13657984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063109446,0.000006153867,0.00016619524,0.0015440679,0.000010932355,0.00012655869,0.00039414305,0.000061839746,0.000038790622,0.05661013,0.94102484,0.000009826999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063893017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008649492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014254371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008727479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075534186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063322544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979254916","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2315306","title":"Sidgwick's Axioms and Consequentialism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Certainty; Ethical egoism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Morality; Nothing; Dishonesty; Objectivism; Consequentialism; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05166272757574716,"score_gpt":0.2666611078554058,"score_spread":0.21499838027965865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979254916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019817445,0.004121482,0.1257669,0.043804634,0.001420251,0.000105053085,0.0007100852,0.00026597484,0.80398816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771603,0.0019552072,0.0678252,0.0065444726,0.00090508664,0.00021908466,0.00045272717,0.00014661145,0.044791218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927447,0.0031048867,0.00064215675,0.0011922708,0.0017714647,0.0005445508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99233454,0.0045559984,0.00043707207,0.0012097888,0.0011622616,0.00030029038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073320153,0.00063343113,0.00070913765,0.0022493429,0.003470768,0.005795769,0.0017712084,0.0029915087,0.0064515127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011343139,0.0005625262,0.0015522594,0.001440043,0.02197504,0.009325647,0.0032128356,0.006008087,0.0010523243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012449183,0.0000012819153,0.00002785869,0.000006484506,0.0000010449564,0.000007833997,0.00010848103,0.00006079851,0.000008355773,0.99801135,0.00094764907,0.0008175598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000687841,0.0000021090702,0.00008727897,0.000017708577,0.0000017534702,0.000023996108,0.00005916069,0.00023305575,0.000052096326,0.98162407,0.017887486,0.000004407446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007496242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004839116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008704584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008704584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040550176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063156486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136643611","doi":"10.1215/00318108-1728714","title":"Dynamics of Epistemic Modality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Northwestern University","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Epistemic modality; Orthodoxy; Philosophy; Modal verb; Truth condition; Counterfactual conditional; Semantics (computer science); Linguistics; Computer science; Verb; Counterfactual thinking; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05768846847458332,"score_gpt":0.27820887657060067,"score_spread":0.22052040809601736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136643611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037712693,0.029444197,0.34745708,0.06916082,0.0014682172,0.00007326221,0.00038130337,0.00029477518,0.5140076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516321,0.008972703,0.018507909,0.002827257,0.001367361,0.00014811238,0.000117037984,0.00011950683,0.016308187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668956,0.001654339,0.00015482643,0.0004749451,0.00083532673,0.00019092785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971602,0.0016301104,0.0002433368,0.0005240459,0.00035273234,0.00008966121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041754358,0.00035075896,0.00048723482,0.002135007,0.0016464627,0.0049155317,0.0010746917,0.0021425518,0.003376256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007055536,0.00029156957,0.0007115198,0.0013057541,0.0151335,0.014960719,0.0034702155,0.004284278,0.00054822344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.668124e-7,5.0099055e-7,0.000012007409,0.00000748927,0.0000011983357,0.0000064068654,0.00017954991,0.000041088428,0.00004823105,0.9986172,0.00019953938,0.0008857763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024403064,0.0000028116806,0.000055464585,0.000024189121,0.0000025236332,0.000045049146,0.00011768668,0.00025724876,0.000086782515,0.9814617,0.017940577,0.0000036215079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081522804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058185955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049155317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032536958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016944888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023607373},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2320808839","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2683576","title":"When Truth Gives Out","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Normative; Rationality; Irish; Property (philosophy); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Subject (documents); Sociology; Aesthetics; Contemporary philosophy; Linguistics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.15160631348221734,"score_gpt":0.3153493341004285,"score_spread":0.16374302061821114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320808839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077440613,0.0041667116,0.012449341,0.09460583,0.010124376,0.00008570447,0.00031861055,0.00041279744,0.8700924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6890918,0.004042409,0.0052003046,0.031362955,0.005714836,0.00022474401,0.00045963243,0.0010902338,0.26281315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985502,0.004514752,0.00082891114,0.0022609201,0.0041771415,0.0027162158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920989,0.0033463878,0.00063510635,0.0015219478,0.0016697451,0.0007279749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090190135,0.00062185904,0.0008243211,0.002192054,0.009660271,0.02272357,0.001572284,0.00782932,0.055662632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035223417,0.00069254666,0.00079576403,0.0014733977,0.025055466,0.025225524,0.009873327,0.008724043,0.014637629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003957003,0.000007690558,0.00030375368,0.00006787888,0.000009422417,0.0003189766,0.011471714,0.000045284483,0.00013116891,0.94167465,0.037743084,0.008186792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018679357,0.000019393712,0.00029952655,0.00040085823,0.000016674812,0.00031526136,0.014856921,0.00015430457,0.00051440176,0.5361154,0.44725606,0.000032524757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004408872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003658676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055662632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007649116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051243487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18621004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328940675","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2366537","title":"Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02977344866634638,"score_gpt":0.38826856471512633,"score_spread":0.3584951160487799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328940675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0244294,0.20247532,0.036768667,0.48545045,0.0031318532,0.000055994053,0.000206675,0.0001424898,0.2473391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8256968,0.056182373,0.01830465,0.04240273,0.008629423,0.00029166174,0.00021938718,0.00013690042,0.048136074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653864,0.0019397628,0.0001136601,0.00037101624,0.0008000389,0.0002368654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926185,0.005723635,0.0004634248,0.00041341016,0.0005106621,0.00027036332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052218917,0.0005250283,0.00072524685,0.002972273,0.0039238892,0.009094478,0.0013873125,0.0061492487,0.005580449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008116321,0.00047772267,0.0006201007,0.0031334383,0.04603386,0.01993258,0.0030982357,0.007421457,0.00072830473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034534532,0.000006417976,0.00007944018,0.000022212116,0.0000021123606,0.000016821232,0.00077737577,0.00009002645,0.000021675774,0.9938315,0.0030939337,0.0020549893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003977134,0.0000029053301,0.00011449307,0.00004045604,0.000001304855,0.0000142388335,0.0003892397,0.00022099909,0.000017449827,0.9773362,0.021854749,0.000003972581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009205942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065631955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009205942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007829486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037267562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05680716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769310928","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3321741","title":"<i>The Powers of Aristotle's Soul</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; General interest; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.04453942780951674,"score_gpt":0.25907765299499297,"score_spread":0.21453822518547622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769310928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008630198,0.051078625,0.027730241,0.08250109,0.005481713,0.000038456023,0.00023255692,0.0001577667,0.82414913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.698592,0.03463788,0.023714755,0.04045403,0.011238166,0.00019021396,0.00031137647,0.00038771317,0.19047384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997338,0.0010752365,0.000092419876,0.00031131887,0.0008914227,0.00029162594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839836,0.00086827873,0.00012996826,0.00014751963,0.00034899937,0.00010694979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020701874,0.000530768,0.000414822,0.001244333,0.0047189603,0.007869737,0.00091546366,0.003046954,0.006418209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003369348,0.00030050345,0.00030169418,0.0012333402,0.023834623,0.0074570747,0.00223908,0.0045382227,0.0026597548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011356865,0.0000055233036,0.00009279167,0.000030673946,0.0000023565397,0.000025874877,0.0019381791,0.000058887435,0.000053844673,0.9678133,0.02415443,0.0058127823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058665796,0.000010951667,0.00032954398,0.00015577121,0.000003178293,0.00009653754,0.00097112946,0.00020662654,0.00013311917,0.59528685,0.40278426,0.000016185404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074057826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010672757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007869737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039796135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033271352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028874218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770397507","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3453237","title":"<i>Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Philosophy; General interest; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.2454877351021055,"score_gpt":0.35536220760199005,"score_spread":0.10987447249988455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770397507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036064486,0.09477952,0.014207296,0.060060762,0.0030336226,0.00002963993,0.00016506479,0.00017031198,0.8239474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34399,0.10985383,0.016713189,0.033725776,0.009607449,0.00029640476,0.00029906371,0.00039271315,0.48512158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893266,0.00048367103,0.000029734845,0.00009518509,0.00033191504,0.00012684331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994318,0.00030665693,0.00006372955,0.00005638851,0.00009298782,0.00004841174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008179893,0.0005026073,0.00027732807,0.0008990313,0.002496571,0.0051309727,0.0006068479,0.0017910319,0.00886568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016084618,0.00024902634,0.00022569527,0.0013324958,0.009468314,0.005154234,0.0016724103,0.003293457,0.0025155188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059080685,0.000006238641,0.000094870666,0.000089882575,0.0000038369817,0.000024390654,0.0013325657,0.0001073588,0.00007807071,0.8717937,0.111679,0.014784195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024505262,0.000008536536,0.000575442,0.00034302275,0.0000038363087,0.00008741355,0.00073420926,0.0001695778,0.00027349358,0.34989172,0.6478992,0.00001116839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003715898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005315444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00886568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027990073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030800353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029658675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784527921","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2812670","title":"Emergent Chance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Operationalization; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.28166437889072693,"score_gpt":0.3044411455930752,"score_spread":0.022776766702348294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784527921","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057285883,0.004473163,0.4729539,0.012669224,0.0005491165,0.00010583772,0.00051721424,0.00034031278,0.4511054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505911,0.0018220824,0.02360625,0.0012861893,0.00036502062,0.0001644734,0.00023030918,0.000094216484,0.021840401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722064,0.0008641511,0.00015607462,0.00074602896,0.00072127645,0.00029189853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950842,0.0022023986,0.0005291854,0.0013595116,0.00053161004,0.00029312543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028290881,0.00032229943,0.00068566453,0.0010938147,0.0017137293,0.0037856912,0.0011733499,0.0016041052,0.00863285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008049592,0.0003125568,0.0010657812,0.00059967587,0.009230963,0.007041729,0.003513359,0.00246968,0.00081316935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032953617,0.0000016788819,0.00018320052,0.000022371027,0.0000061432906,0.000027686616,0.000081909144,0.0003971189,0.000074841744,0.99689096,0.00031168872,0.0019990592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004321862,0.000009035151,0.0002964738,0.000026934495,0.000007837839,0.00009402264,0.00005473257,0.0012209105,0.00015686806,0.9872227,0.010898676,0.0000073867195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012326144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014095374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00863285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025825324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016793845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028879702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174367982","doi":"10.1215/00318108-8809906","title":"Self-Knowledge Requirements and Moore's Paradox","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Nothing; Irrational number; Rationality; Appearance of impropriety; Epistemology; Philosophy; Consistency (knowledge bases); Blame; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.16036985983275928,"score_gpt":0.34438372195903333,"score_spread":0.18401386212627405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174367982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09837222,0.041773655,0.13586305,0.18688907,0.0012500695,0.000106887186,0.00023629722,0.00025876533,0.5352499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644926,0.009643831,0.014349977,0.0060259714,0.00065834704,0.00011151216,0.00007478024,0.000044535773,0.004598485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920101,0.0037239117,0.000551365,0.0008201275,0.002463806,0.00043077816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982307,0.01163493,0.0015693154,0.002054872,0.0019187301,0.000515227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009291173,0.00031328446,0.0010511461,0.0019945968,0.0021578819,0.0048435614,0.0016232869,0.0045699384,0.0030525168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016365102,0.0004655795,0.00087824155,0.001568748,0.027168633,0.015135873,0.0035137984,0.0059918463,0.0005448015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004715706,0.000004571844,0.000046705,0.000043000815,0.00000426577,0.000044213964,0.00040221855,0.000167404,0.000032591666,0.99661297,0.00045975664,0.0021777502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004342497,0.0000023894772,0.0000695493,0.000040905892,0.0000016475345,0.000041984753,0.00014447304,0.00019061516,0.000045575845,0.99480104,0.004653066,0.000004467125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015834762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001086986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009291173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040849415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033576794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049136996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232575378","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3321751","title":"<i>Epistemological Disjunctivism</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.13529463736851016,"score_gpt":0.29880055248784515,"score_spread":0.163505915119335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232575378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010298781,0.025252115,0.06986847,0.27777907,0.004721576,0.00006667486,0.00021930716,0.0002291578,0.6115648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7074017,0.015421,0.038880337,0.11031613,0.014524021,0.000705928,0.0004354504,0.00043148233,0.111883864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996714,0.0012729284,0.00013713064,0.0007162231,0.0008851435,0.0002745027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607277,0.0023067025,0.00026466302,0.00057533226,0.00057788676,0.00020267045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029261503,0.0005296334,0.000522078,0.0012676578,0.004152056,0.009011874,0.0018570414,0.0032168098,0.010267512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064745867,0.00041542645,0.0006719025,0.0013294638,0.023726676,0.01207487,0.004641811,0.010135376,0.0022893408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006174772,0.000006740677,0.00008628206,0.000029801451,0.0000031814902,0.000031455573,0.00065161893,0.000058228787,0.000041860305,0.97594154,0.020242477,0.0029007068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050308904,0.0000074659756,0.0002060232,0.00008864616,0.0000031243435,0.00010452084,0.0005659749,0.00035810992,0.00019268836,0.85077196,0.14768493,0.000011485123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003845847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026672285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010267512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047334903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025406627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03434831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240045488","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3683702","title":"Book reviews","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Presupposition; Contextualism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.16457040432500217,"score_gpt":0.32653637707859307,"score_spread":0.1619659727535909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240045488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005202023,0.048867315,0.0017214275,0.012801106,0.017590456,0.00013386758,0.0039906483,0.00091110106,0.91346383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032740834,0.025952755,0.0012703314,0.005888392,0.0039703916,0.000093242335,0.0038221646,0.0006140953,0.9551145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854064,0.00017916311,0.000093100476,0.0003575841,0.0006928726,0.00013666209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828255,0.00032961124,0.00009991966,0.00026846136,0.0006829169,0.00033652195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007608982,0.00106364,0.0012653297,0.0024692311,0.0015222273,0.008171415,0.0026521059,0.003188064,0.62654483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042130905,0.00049560325,0.00083757984,0.0036518688,0.0010383031,0.0051447167,0.0031100933,0.0028004225,0.56857574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026003312,0.000027643504,0.000119145945,0.0005723212,0.000007739141,0.000119196404,0.0001275248,0.000072431816,0.00022775655,0.0141415065,0.85031796,0.13424076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021617336,0.0000037208558,0.00007261398,0.00013541181,0.0000016321933,0.00006957512,0.00003589083,0.000009318294,0.000023520166,0.0012163994,0.9984273,0.0000024871697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003162649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045634704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62654483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022010521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037884815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53268844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381295115","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10317606","title":"<i>The Fragmented Mind</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fragmentation (computing); Odds; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07824043112395429,"score_gpt":0.2906476658112364,"score_spread":0.21240723468728212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381295115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029892654,0.09162512,0.009852998,0.08633716,0.0408772,0.00008456038,0.00063839415,0.00054741255,0.767048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09568852,0.0638843,0.0077749067,0.0422162,0.05977491,0.00035614366,0.001337251,0.0016308274,0.727337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993437,0.00020109185,0.000021211526,0.00013351845,0.00021325935,0.00008726609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869305,0.0007045998,0.00007527982,0.00012304942,0.00024785253,0.00015621119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005883811,0.0009192445,0.0004862816,0.0013054414,0.0025211484,0.006483289,0.0009654629,0.0015120324,0.032432545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002608874,0.00033374014,0.0006586905,0.0013570731,0.004369355,0.005215809,0.0020110235,0.0053306906,0.010206467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023242594,0.000019030627,0.00020193122,0.00015973617,0.0000065395525,0.00004537704,0.0018090903,0.00012043591,0.00017231949,0.13756351,0.8319059,0.027972953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022099418,0.000012993568,0.0005028735,0.00028321875,0.000003322021,0.00009583921,0.00066286407,0.00011320914,0.00006510472,0.033432193,0.96481633,0.000009904054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047039967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006957553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032432545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003592049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020464894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10849774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381295152","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10317619","title":"<i>Vagueness and the Evolution of Consciousness</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Direct and indirect realism; Vagueness; Consciousness; Materialism; Epistemology; Qualia; Philosophy; Physicalism; Eliminative materialism; Representation (politics); Psychology; Perception; Metaphysics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03409220719408334,"score_gpt":0.3296706982972625,"score_spread":0.29557849110317913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381295152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067466356,0.113637045,0.07089112,0.25668898,0.0031415191,0.00006950108,0.00019949162,0.00025384882,0.4876521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87093383,0.025866898,0.013335068,0.016910443,0.0028906802,0.00012704391,0.00015238262,0.00016680776,0.06961688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930847,0.00026096436,0.0000333216,0.00015438051,0.00016562943,0.00007729217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871504,0.0008277383,0.00014881404,0.000104626095,0.0001455822,0.00005820898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011294337,0.00029644792,0.00035641892,0.00087716145,0.0021521437,0.005855235,0.0007256621,0.0018056408,0.004025299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032086128,0.00026034203,0.00048332312,0.0011715351,0.0130056515,0.010236957,0.0020482596,0.003857822,0.0004537111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000954388,0.000004791391,0.00016573345,0.000042456722,0.0000047424164,0.000054525754,0.0018578684,0.00022634419,0.000142188,0.9866356,0.0065023275,0.0043537277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041529024,0.000010173112,0.0003651816,0.00009583547,0.0000047440026,0.00011291876,0.0008777248,0.0005868471,0.00030858748,0.91424626,0.083371386,0.000016246513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030333183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018980472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005855235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030700061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011026658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022274613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381295167","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10294513","title":"<i>Responsible Citizens, Irresponsible States: Should Citizens Pay for Their State’s Wrongdoings?</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.16836967576921558,"score_gpt":0.40352785466462326,"score_spread":0.2351581788954077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381295167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025909843,0.0031893535,0.0010276862,0.96090794,0.0028536445,0.000010011914,0.000039472747,0.000028775483,0.029352233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09753813,0.0034641488,0.0019788733,0.85738766,0.0043539735,0.000054196695,0.00006327728,0.00012409652,0.035035692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962508,0.0016934379,0.00027518644,0.0005115486,0.0007598692,0.00050924165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897372,0.0063844086,0.0008529768,0.00046627971,0.0019196667,0.0006395643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004373387,0.00059727154,0.0005138203,0.0003513376,0.007799045,0.010640356,0.0020839325,0.026312493,0.006818747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022039149,0.00042106866,0.00043851562,0.0004338498,0.01936818,0.013938793,0.0047468776,0.022035604,0.0027647587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001909969,0.000019013403,0.0010479406,0.000104483195,0.000011686267,0.00046390897,0.01825157,0.00005914938,0.0003588212,0.26367682,0.7040649,0.011922546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009740993,0.000019860276,0.002132803,0.0006195733,0.000012646155,0.0008152398,0.039468616,0.00021211707,0.0005536674,0.08603651,0.87003636,0.000082786675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018931882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0296767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026312493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004593685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005332372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037643373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388563632","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10469551","title":"<i>Leveraging Distortions: Explanation, Idealization, and Universality in Science</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealization; Universality (dynamical systems); Premise; Epistemology; Computer science; Commit; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.08916689176177763,"score_gpt":0.2873756671143291,"score_spread":0.1982087753525515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388563632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015330987,0.044794727,0.15419835,0.44394487,0.0047951913,0.000080734586,0.0003656455,0.00073272694,0.33575687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78218704,0.019655207,0.05482274,0.077382036,0.0072884276,0.0003788757,0.00043740988,0.00087849464,0.056969766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936931,0.0036569731,0.00022360095,0.0006557198,0.0013163032,0.0004542883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920912,0.005001526,0.0006589779,0.0010922336,0.0008644626,0.0002916966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00796082,0.0010433557,0.00073089614,0.0020224932,0.004699309,0.011846873,0.0023607071,0.0046100775,0.005695242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01121277,0.00056647975,0.0012677099,0.0018027759,0.060521297,0.02683843,0.005554511,0.011545001,0.0013956956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007424929,0.000004620543,0.00010805378,0.00003662466,0.0000062497525,0.000023525867,0.0014726114,0.0001699239,0.00004799945,0.98511606,0.010446857,0.0025601222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004760988,0.000004938003,0.00011616942,0.00006271563,0.0000045476613,0.000047381523,0.0007001307,0.00039227115,0.0001136187,0.9454115,0.053128663,0.000013344184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006255038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051133097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008440676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055111214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061241686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404525144","doi":"10.1215/00318108-11249853","title":"<i>Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Epistemology; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.024114678233522546,"score_gpt":0.29401688819158933,"score_spread":0.2699022099580668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404525144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030544435,0.12295816,0.009138062,0.095560886,0.019803425,0.00004732782,0.00018361877,0.00029515108,0.74895895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15186346,0.09989691,0.0069195526,0.05082761,0.035590835,0.00021023082,0.0005255515,0.0005347235,0.65363115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940073,0.00022085573,0.000021868409,0.00005936609,0.00022117591,0.0000760124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991959,0.00038866294,0.00007888392,0.00006260802,0.00018109391,0.00009291242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005060266,0.0004965755,0.00036716403,0.00080036686,0.002772584,0.0067038,0.0008504008,0.0014375363,0.019016823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023413717,0.0002780471,0.00041440598,0.0011459084,0.0052336953,0.005847263,0.0014723291,0.00473884,0.005033422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013840512,0.000016131155,0.00017591925,0.0001875149,0.000008388484,0.000076446566,0.001186859,0.00014487127,0.00018264209,0.5765716,0.3939939,0.027441824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032519758,0.0000122357005,0.000540065,0.0003072478,0.000004057816,0.00014283779,0.00073419913,0.00024889054,0.0001301255,0.16145375,0.83641297,0.000010501001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042364085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049042767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019016823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027848366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028166668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06361765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414692400","doi":"10.1215/00318108-11964820","title":"A Dominance Argument Against Incompleteness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Argument (complex analysis); Outcome (game theory); Ex-ante; Ranking (information retrieval); Dominance (genetics)","score_opus":0.09144817609546423,"score_gpt":0.3230929386317196,"score_spread":0.23164476253625538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414692400","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037386585,0.012263194,0.68832946,0.043769713,0.0006982883,0.000110512556,0.00036986105,0.00012123524,0.21695116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89185244,0.005720598,0.06953351,0.008852926,0.0017261808,0.0004318772,0.00024429773,0.00013748223,0.021500746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98559374,0.0073831985,0.0006044077,0.0015088622,0.004102379,0.00080748094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96883374,0.022298478,0.0018120618,0.0027160924,0.0036077641,0.00073186896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018296167,0.0008220953,0.0014487298,0.0016446923,0.0019928766,0.003950513,0.0018328748,0.0024042903,0.0060135005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027979806,0.0006228443,0.0015203984,0.0011136231,0.010425833,0.011422651,0.004418982,0.0061481562,0.0007773997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073925526,0.000006605076,0.00010108321,0.000051659234,0.000015791202,0.000022419114,0.00013790108,0.0007963673,0.00007136319,0.9936226,0.0008102258,0.0043566553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010488803,0.000009456723,0.000081992795,0.000048918082,0.0000075120975,0.000035533416,0.00003325654,0.001014024,0.000104650986,0.9917489,0.006899155,0.000006000669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012381409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000999109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018296167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034478991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030310322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09676051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}