{"meta":{"query_hash":"4d610b598cc8","filters":{"venue":"The Philosophical Review"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4d610b598cc8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Philosophical+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1971274375","doi":"10.1215/00318108-110-2-291","title":"THE NEW DIALECTIC: CONVERSATIONAL CONTEXTS OF ARGUMENT; AD HOMINEM ARGUMENTS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Citation; Download; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06217263187437377,"score_gpt":0.2968226115447535,"score_spread":0.2346499796703797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971274375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087820966,0.07408811,0.00002327447,0.84886473,0.0005306669,0.00071203714,0.000023996277,0.000041659103,0.07483729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91644454,0.068805926,0.0000052309897,0.011911957,0.0010929687,0.000037154135,0.000010894955,0.000021512076,0.001669842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798054,0.00028985523,0.00062039547,0.0002341363,0.0005738171,0.00030126938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751705,0.001303698,0.00027862526,0.0005390453,0.00019891335,0.00016265629],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012256688,0.00022161721,0.00041527674,0.00002606086,0.00057418976,0.000079809564,0.0006495435,0.000060462433,0.0022205142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007316029,0.00011133214,0.0002804722,0.00009689726,0.0010939434,0.00010325578,0.00013120605,0.00048678336,0.00033340388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056407727,0.000069476155,0.0000033961633,0.00012472748,0.000094498784,0.0000031118102,0.00040595589,2.5943893e-7,0.000011508564,0.98830754,0.0010523404,0.009870772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002702664,0.00006455574,0.000020791933,0.00047456747,0.000094438015,0.0000065460563,0.000011903331,0.000008967304,0.000007373557,0.7056258,0.2933129,0.00010190136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027840233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004507956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031195606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116099814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979254916","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2315306","title":"Sidgwick's Axioms and Consequentialism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Certainty; Ethical egoism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Morality; Nothing; Dishonesty; Objectivism; Consequentialism; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05166272757574716,"score_gpt":0.2666611078554058,"score_spread":0.21499838027965865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979254916","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059333927,0.03474718,0.00004906002,0.80813766,0.00029152737,0.00031679263,0.000013227638,0.00008507662,0.15576616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290254,0.018595144,0.000006353494,0.050498206,0.0016473162,0.000030246694,0.0000061583687,0.000021806385,0.00016933912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985026,0.00037684254,0.0003434446,0.00026008545,0.00027659445,0.000240397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985837,0.00061623554,0.00010123296,0.00045338855,0.00009260585,0.00015285575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013942643,0.00019626804,0.00038579595,0.000025521655,0.00042786117,0.00010317347,0.00032898513,0.0000626184,0.001175348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056693057,0.00011063481,0.00014063263,0.00004259415,0.0016264091,0.000079416415,0.00014439445,0.0004943368,0.00036049748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055291453,0.000021510754,1.8922711e-7,0.00037537824,0.000021691822,0.0000020412608,0.0003237042,4.7733426e-8,0.000009217754,0.9936799,0.00014158666,0.0054192017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010971348,0.00004512766,0.000002866203,0.00058167294,0.000078274046,0.000012999992,0.000006370813,0.000029537921,0.0000025141553,0.7671972,0.23180503,0.00012869627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028633387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011408613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008182159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001981321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136643611","doi":"10.1215/00318108-1728714","title":"Dynamics of Epistemic Modality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Northwestern University","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Epistemic modality; Orthodoxy; Philosophy; Modal verb; Truth condition; Counterfactual conditional; Semantics (computer science); Linguistics; Computer science; Verb; Counterfactual thinking; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05768846847458332,"score_gpt":0.27820887657060067,"score_spread":0.22052040809601736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136643611","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002353269,0.0024588413,0.00010987499,0.976892,0.00026391086,0.00050521013,0.000020012805,0.00003418806,0.017362699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436086,0.0027279695,0.000054385826,0.0018143811,0.00070598343,0.00003611759,0.000018116387,0.000013523421,0.000268688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890506,0.00013222691,0.00046875395,0.00013323859,0.00022472917,0.0001359815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883044,0.00023384672,0.00021297068,0.00043631505,0.00024254016,0.000043901215],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004790723,0.00011359165,0.00032566555,0.000017075981,0.00010326474,0.000031259213,0.00029352246,0.000030457857,0.002226758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007792635,0.00006869787,0.00012546181,0.000035614055,0.00026083805,0.0000565889,0.00006241273,0.0001506547,0.0005191168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011260693,0.000030059122,0.00001613294,0.0007966144,0.00001914721,2.4175617e-7,0.0004360199,3.596326e-7,0.0000026863681,0.99713326,0.000037301794,0.0015270676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054267504,0.000019024505,0.00011633327,0.0008538098,0.00009219587,0.0000019894399,0.000036903155,0.0008232247,0.0000017282272,0.9976985,0.00022037432,0.00008165282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007922085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009173487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99200755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034450954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019441666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868536},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2320808839","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2683576","title":"When Truth Gives Out","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Normative; Rationality; Irish; Property (philosophy); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Subject (documents); Sociology; Aesthetics; Contemporary philosophy; Linguistics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.15160631348221734,"score_gpt":0.3153493341004285,"score_spread":0.16374302061821114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320808839","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018002301,0.03863095,0.0000772957,0.6154137,0.0009635479,0.00032338768,0.0000114528575,0.00009597872,0.34430364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8838941,0.03276949,0.00008856993,0.066409715,0.0082555525,0.0000796861,0.000021534232,0.000055371678,0.008425967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986008,0.00042400727,0.00032432473,0.0002131457,0.00021468682,0.0002230474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851483,0.00065372104,0.00012266978,0.0005315462,0.00009433555,0.000082923994],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011042309,0.00016876373,0.0004385152,0.000016175922,0.00028795554,0.00005087621,0.0004158227,0.000050289764,0.0010254453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006381478,0.0000929196,0.00023185655,0.000017263197,0.0007863573,0.00007522585,0.00007364995,0.0004144075,0.0013464451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027786475,0.000028093249,0.0000012696172,0.00057108875,0.000025194004,5.641592e-7,0.0022412466,4.811555e-8,0.0000016955325,0.98795104,0.0024435392,0.006733466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005220352,0.00003427114,0.0000035927612,0.00038441026,0.00007701373,0.0000011695935,0.000016183738,0.0000036374784,0.0000018845925,0.5528531,0.44649547,0.000077023156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000112941425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026428483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8837141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008647515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018394934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328940675","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2366537","title":"Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02977344866634638,"score_gpt":0.38826856471512633,"score_spread":0.3584951160487799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328940675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021861084,0.02871575,0.0000021308974,0.9075646,0.000093242175,0.00052580365,0.0000019431213,0.000009868207,0.060900595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401871,0.037558462,0.000082629784,0.021762988,0.00019136544,0.00004088591,6.071436e-7,0.000003283806,0.0001727082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988937,0.00032801914,0.00018823681,0.0001237078,0.0003401526,0.0001261758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985048,0.00078390725,0.00013574192,0.00023080232,0.000276999,0.00006772602],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002893096,0.0000622397,0.00017518809,0.000020787884,0.0006132053,0.0001326102,0.0003079196,0.000041867628,0.00016000189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027615733,0.000029138155,0.00003923361,0.0008304307,0.003377001,0.00048470552,0.000068635614,0.00043400735,0.000024999645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015013826,0.000016032242,0.000010407266,0.000046384477,0.000007446619,2.614125e-8,0.0008160541,1.0697799e-8,0.00000812531,0.99259824,0.0008221574,0.005673601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010722232,0.00000594417,0.00029729135,0.00012563933,0.000055419125,0.0000011909266,0.00022251136,0.0000043792816,0.000004462585,0.7837602,0.21537136,0.000044426004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066525914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033295466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009499792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019843645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769310928","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3321741","title":"<i>The Powers of Aristotle's Soul</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; General interest; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.04453942780951674,"score_gpt":0.25907765299499297,"score_spread":0.21453822518547622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769310928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012984521,0.04112197,0.000012631024,0.7928827,0.0003668896,0.00029823568,0.000027873215,0.00004032626,0.16511957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548414,0.03493975,0.0000034662191,0.006901692,0.0013820109,0.000033859716,0.0000013158708,0.000020634257,0.0018758634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862385,0.00017392058,0.00045738267,0.00017732673,0.00032879776,0.00023871641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795985,0.0010474535,0.00018120605,0.0006226707,0.00010360882,0.00008518896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006442095,0.00016029533,0.0003275508,0.000013088811,0.00042025986,0.000029196213,0.0005896163,0.000034104687,0.0008466982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045128076,0.000054324108,0.0003012614,0.00006138607,0.0014755185,0.00007429834,0.00011164949,0.00019477015,0.00044305416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017879498,0.000035070054,9.414114e-7,0.00012899573,0.000028468885,0.0000012748749,0.00009679154,1.1122664e-8,0.000034196604,0.9768383,0.004138206,0.018679855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007526899,0.000033765817,0.000002754009,0.0006180075,0.000043447777,0.0000016621269,0.0000039250585,2.3838423e-7,0.000011071014,0.52658445,0.47256812,0.00005727722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005661046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000126377245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95471156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017904867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024637255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92707515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770397507","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3453237","title":"<i>Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Philosophy; General interest; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.2454877351021055,"score_gpt":0.35536220760199005,"score_spread":0.10987447249988455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770397507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006520089,0.0122369565,0.000011365089,0.90825117,0.0002609754,0.000275381,0.0000299301,0.000042861757,0.07823937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86815196,0.071640596,0.0000035756423,0.0582533,0.0014393012,0.000036093308,0.0000017527726,0.000021992366,0.00045142137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835473,0.0003781238,0.000328995,0.0003031008,0.00039583552,0.00023922055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728477,0.0018645048,0.000107408814,0.00047011027,0.0001263513,0.00014688198],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016447895,0.00020602836,0.00031931847,0.000029165694,0.00049377535,0.000054185686,0.00029370954,0.00010762555,0.0022395386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011008162,0.00008591277,0.00013660353,0.00004071316,0.0011854636,0.00009591912,0.000100122554,0.0008124521,0.0009387535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002204388,0.000039942093,3.4043026e-7,0.0002475656,0.000022166098,0.000003199199,0.0003297484,1.21189645e-8,0.000037334572,0.9740007,0.00026257135,0.025034355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013098572,0.00007975298,0.000004057327,0.0018671529,0.000045060744,0.0000070130254,0.0000062127733,5.1168297e-7,0.000019268064,0.7099241,0.2877994,0.0001164687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005359203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014253022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86749995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019500105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040026316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784527921","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2812670","title":"Emergent Chance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Operationalization; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.28166437889072693,"score_gpt":0.3044411455930752,"score_spread":0.022776766702348294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784527921","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000147906,0.089946516,0.000005710368,0.6055266,0.0007070361,0.00022500668,0.000005876487,0.00006092189,0.3033744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347428,0.019722387,0.000022985629,0.038834978,0.0034073507,0.000073319774,0.0000045160573,0.00001713917,0.0031745166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895537,0.00007643065,0.00022733427,0.00018317807,0.0003692055,0.00018846881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924874,0.000030972384,0.00007795003,0.0003642468,0.000107026965,0.00017103612],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006790351,0.000118552074,0.00021077145,0.000018629713,0.00031465632,0.00003055176,0.00052006793,0.00001588797,0.0013691701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014630346,0.000067239234,0.00010512726,0.000061509316,0.0006510657,0.00014807325,0.000071953196,0.00017557976,0.0019437503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003613581,0.000028774108,3.781241e-7,0.00009692749,0.00000492382,0.0000022372246,0.0010349785,2.843755e-7,0.0000023716204,0.9831677,0.0136125805,0.0020452118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038089864,0.00003864115,0.0000012414639,0.00021256856,0.000017044056,0.0000028538013,0.000013052211,0.0000053282597,9.828393e-7,0.4758379,0.52376646,0.00006584777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013496084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012581887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029763265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040956773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174367982","doi":"10.1215/00318108-8809906","title":"Self-Knowledge Requirements and Moore's Paradox","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Nothing; Irrational number; Rationality; Appearance of impropriety; Epistemology; Philosophy; Consistency (knowledge bases); Blame; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.16036985983275928,"score_gpt":0.34438372195903333,"score_spread":0.18401386212627405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174367982","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010897671,0.39537096,0.000007937754,0.3864535,0.00061352167,0.00040067977,0.000015309004,0.000098789154,0.2159495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56485903,0.3934999,0.00018876426,0.031960957,0.003916536,0.00009666282,0.000034613062,0.00005464723,0.005388863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987093,0.00034858374,0.00031742727,0.00025166397,0.00016559822,0.00020743537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989642,0.0002648134,0.000087112145,0.00042428664,0.00016916245,0.00009041803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006668176,0.00015978063,0.00039399313,0.000012382766,0.0003169332,0.00005835379,0.00019690988,0.000048979506,0.00041170482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021006394,0.00009928958,0.00014017885,0.000050224044,0.00045221415,0.00008284211,0.00013883275,0.00034570563,0.00032211555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019217894,0.00009246935,0.0000055191094,0.0016581453,0.00006276847,0.000008854361,0.0017992038,9.616571e-9,0.0000049109285,0.99137104,0.0010772011,0.003917983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009674747,0.000023568433,0.000012694888,0.00061200716,0.0001679437,0.000011094807,0.00003226648,0.0000049504915,0.0000082272945,0.53238356,0.4665492,0.000097762226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000044511194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029980953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5637693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013938394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057649493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4507879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232575378","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3321751","title":"<i>Epistemological Disjunctivism</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.13529463736851016,"score_gpt":0.29880055248784515,"score_spread":0.163505915119335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232575378","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005686615,0.029334715,0.00011611064,0.83710974,0.0006542842,0.00042054625,0.000027325432,0.00012639092,0.13164224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091511,0.03576038,0.000017935863,0.042444397,0.0029248653,0.00010065997,0.000004720349,0.00003180159,0.009564178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983063,0.00042929203,0.00039053743,0.00029197853,0.00027334277,0.00030858407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981807,0.0008752938,0.00013517817,0.0005877163,0.00011482099,0.000106295214],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010097239,0.00020831214,0.00047451642,0.000015286972,0.00031083685,0.00003237442,0.00046817795,0.00006796861,0.0016072916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000528607,0.000079308054,0.00029714304,0.000040196534,0.0015675897,0.00010753889,0.00011375208,0.00031433016,0.0017211956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008040706,0.00005194939,0.00000793689,0.00027497203,0.000027816142,0.000005395393,0.00018349683,7.500319e-9,0.000028133481,0.98536164,0.0027536405,0.011296951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100694364,0.000059511003,0.000016432516,0.00073713454,0.000073003954,0.000008810352,0.000006386618,2.3652728e-7,0.0000068485847,0.61249894,0.38638064,0.000111382964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008311509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000133398635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9085824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002200765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028740038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240045488","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3683702","title":"Book reviews","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Presupposition; Contextualism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.16457040432500217,"score_gpt":0.32653637707859307,"score_spread":0.1619659727535909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240045488","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000044651315,0.45746824,0.000018132841,0.4812228,0.0002646298,0.000352523,0.000007142418,0.00003621422,0.060625862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00426912,0.8039489,0.000012395637,0.16299975,0.0027352497,0.00010795076,0.0000027928586,0.00002328024,0.025900556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985018,0.0004175106,0.0004540589,0.00021409776,0.00018020942,0.00023232975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986395,0.00039877382,0.00016440482,0.00062808034,0.00008555571,0.00008366584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012542176,0.00017375476,0.0005118714,0.000014064709,0.00023347158,0.000022820272,0.00040659445,0.000043516986,0.005900551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005304295,0.000067435205,0.00030630492,0.000030127107,0.0008181391,0.00012522493,0.00007127709,0.00024360357,0.0048229857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022078702,0.000020688034,5.081317e-7,0.0005876454,0.000014828767,0.0000013059258,0.0002324515,1.234742e-9,0.000009888697,0.8823249,0.096419185,0.02038642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052859767,0.000023159628,0.0000010834971,0.0019349017,0.000068410256,0.00000274105,0.0000017507426,6.297511e-8,0.0000030834456,0.3769456,0.62088746,0.00007887364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004678504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008874242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52446824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001638551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023214408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381295115","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10317606","title":"<i>The Fragmented Mind</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fragmentation (computing); Odds; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07824043112395429,"score_gpt":0.2906476658112364,"score_spread":0.21240723468728212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381295115","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021328712,0.02348765,0.0000012445869,0.82344437,0.00054344005,0.00041423304,0.00002039027,0.0001410517,0.15173434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81045234,0.112176925,0.0000051991847,0.04772253,0.009408011,0.00035205466,0.000059837173,0.00007942517,0.019743685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850106,0.00018578036,0.00037684164,0.00021390224,0.00037635036,0.00034606445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835956,0.00080725993,0.000091306865,0.0005739988,0.00006778119,0.0001000698],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008093011,0.00017608424,0.0002628919,0.00002043143,0.0011328827,0.000117745774,0.0005996805,0.000032946453,0.0009396148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032686113,0.000078154255,0.00026140412,0.00021588444,0.0007040324,0.00006736458,0.00016028536,0.00038162,0.0071020667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075945363,0.00002170462,3.5013636e-7,0.00012327552,0.000028458073,0.000006515353,0.00017843759,1.8399834e-7,0.0000025814875,0.955969,0.02927516,0.014386735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050005707,0.00001797177,0.000003512629,0.0002798824,0.00003907346,0.000001583824,0.000008931562,0.000014488801,0.000001851594,0.4804743,0.51904327,0.00006513062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004228819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001714724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.810239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015589261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019449431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381295152","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10317619","title":"<i>Vagueness and the Evolution of Consciousness</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Direct and indirect realism; Vagueness; Consciousness; Materialism; Epistemology; Qualia; Philosophy; Physicalism; Eliminative materialism; Representation (politics); Psychology; Perception; Metaphysics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03409220719408334,"score_gpt":0.3296706982972625,"score_spread":0.29557849110317913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381295152","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057734903,0.092391774,0.0001343308,0.7897212,0.0003639333,0.0008222561,0.000014119244,0.000087870496,0.11069103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873555,0.009114807,0.0000025586405,0.0032277468,0.00014745073,0.00007976163,0.0000012391666,0.0000070417664,0.00006389682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983555,0.0006209765,0.00031853755,0.00022130272,0.00025859987,0.00022505363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979493,0.0012877228,0.00010884081,0.0005360846,0.00004800733,0.00007005604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026321383,0.00010868485,0.00032928103,0.000022950517,0.00016125181,0.000007941634,0.0005009384,0.00005179887,0.00018600027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005986745,0.00004708228,0.00011350806,0.00081561785,0.0026104073,0.000031750773,0.00016421512,0.00021364137,0.0004175952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004602375,0.000017913673,0.00001795809,0.00013957835,0.000016480182,0.0000028424922,0.00009053268,3.009393e-7,0.000020504292,0.9964721,0.00017642761,0.0029993285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036366784,0.000025776444,0.0007832215,0.00036404008,0.00007891174,0.000025877078,0.000017787006,0.000027626036,0.000004544582,0.9972407,0.0010038015,0.000064037275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032634918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.322718e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011742874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020738777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381295167","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10294513","title":"<i>Responsible Citizens, Irresponsible States: Should Citizens Pay for Their State’s Wrongdoings?</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.16836967576921558,"score_gpt":0.40352785466462326,"score_spread":0.2351581788954077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381295167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007813221,0.009431212,0.00020569748,0.9642717,0.0005374276,0.0020811532,0.00047373408,0.000686813,0.021530915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.501893,0.31771508,0.00035403296,0.1650076,0.0040738257,0.0012477941,0.0002418563,0.00024432753,0.009222516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944652,0.001603234,0.00079250726,0.0006187412,0.0010103146,0.00151003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98965144,0.008340307,0.00018452524,0.0008489009,0.00034956343,0.00062528375],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008944984,0.00041043203,0.0007973911,0.00013106989,0.0016198177,0.00014511545,0.0011815199,0.00026720692,0.00027668584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007119314,0.00024057654,0.0005626883,0.0015913892,0.0012590078,0.00019908576,0.00026184093,0.0010147709,0.0010820407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012709611,0.000054175507,0.000006581224,0.000763817,0.000057162786,0.000014848862,0.001403242,0.000009804258,0.00003697687,0.9696144,0.023629831,0.004282077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002156485,0.00008003817,0.000024456825,0.00083165866,0.00007151778,0.0000025792501,0.00011652775,0.000050397004,0.00004057752,0.69186294,0.30643693,0.0002667291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012209787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008525933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79926413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014442668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008879148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388563632","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10469551","title":"<i>Leveraging Distortions: Explanation, Idealization, and Universality in Science</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealization; Universality (dynamical systems); Premise; Epistemology; Computer science; Commit; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.08916689176177763,"score_gpt":0.2873756671143291,"score_spread":0.1982087753525515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388563632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014407254,0.019492414,0.000028456958,0.8744648,0.0004913338,0.0006025912,0.000015118676,0.00022051093,0.090277515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845729,0.010779653,0.0000042851293,0.004277035,0.00016942523,0.000017946199,0.0000061454994,0.000004864499,0.00016776513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990052,0.00006255574,0.00022468642,0.00022199182,0.00031405984,0.00017152993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995014,0.00007927587,0.00006411704,0.00020261094,0.000087028304,0.00006556692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013546548,0.00008019496,0.0001405964,0.00011910004,0.00082904927,0.0000732452,0.0003110587,0.00001135239,0.00012753237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023081177,0.000055822737,0.00002891829,0.00050603563,0.0016358533,0.0003832494,0.00007815105,0.00011323236,0.000089446294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001202194,0.000009520285,0.00003919326,0.000108273875,0.0000012137787,0.0000020872244,0.0026583227,0.0000025716251,0.0000064198252,0.9957299,0.00064277364,0.00079850527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007576663,0.000012264544,0.0007418119,0.0004892367,0.000012900545,0.0000024603346,0.00016385369,0.00012696457,7.250268e-7,0.8724794,0.12579548,0.00009913767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057445057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046427966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006165549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006323751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.637646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404525144","doi":"10.1215/00318108-11249853","title":"<i>Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Epistemology; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.024114678233522546,"score_gpt":0.29401688819158933,"score_spread":0.2699022099580668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404525144","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010981103,0.1635009,0.04788814,0.78256756,0.00032035878,0.0009643026,0.000082936225,0.00016620966,0.003411447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871193,0.010637511,0.000015243494,0.0016660178,0.00037270342,0.0001346408,0.00001019035,0.000019002726,0.000025395717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924564,0.000045553345,0.00020101918,0.00023314026,0.00012005969,0.00015455515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994284,0.00013011362,0.000029519888,0.0003095731,0.000023222196,0.0000792002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036450019,0.00012640697,0.00019387685,0.0000142684175,0.000133348,0.00006202779,0.00019587346,0.000020365602,0.00030080503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000080082855,0.00007478552,0.00010314183,0.00021720806,0.0000365802,0.00004563795,0.00009058565,0.00023299418,0.00029097218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.293342e-7,0.00001420913,7.4245173e-7,0.00021514333,0.00002100158,7.3509216e-7,0.0000081844155,6.5531815e-8,0.000073673975,0.9850143,0.0006453725,0.014006126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003056314,0.000010288751,0.000001250406,0.0007853168,0.0000915375,0.0000051134084,0.000003797554,0.0028726344,0.000014392805,0.9386418,0.057448942,0.00009436911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008562733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.1611982e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98602116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000049946457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029648018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3739956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414692400","doi":"10.1215/00318108-11964820","title":"A Dominance Argument Against Incompleteness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Argument (complex analysis); Outcome (game theory); Ex-ante; Ranking (information retrieval); Dominance (genetics)","score_opus":0.09144817609546423,"score_gpt":0.3230929386317196,"score_spread":0.23164476253625538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414692400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008956377,0.10938677,0.00006697437,0.6452692,0.0008535563,0.0006550212,0.000016573431,0.00006791259,0.24278833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7694275,0.09790343,0.000049594884,0.124458194,0.0015164173,0.00023968374,0.000019374342,0.000024368726,0.0063614734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987504,0.0002490918,0.00038689832,0.00022516877,0.00017168217,0.00021678768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886763,0.00032421612,0.000111445304,0.00053022365,0.00012345274,0.000043041102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008070996,0.00016848948,0.00045823783,0.000025734671,0.00038048328,0.000044480177,0.00044686545,0.00004269213,0.00016571971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020118477,0.00009868494,0.00021018705,0.00007737453,0.00069684006,0.000055165885,0.00012685268,0.00038083593,0.0002474107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060007783,0.00005209363,0.0000024694805,0.0012653619,0.00003980796,0.0000026418472,0.00038268784,3.684039e-7,0.0000071776094,0.9853357,0.0018897009,0.011015963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000921551,0.000013282437,0.00001237375,0.0017171059,0.000076532815,6.4411233e-7,0.000016575439,0.0000056145745,0.000005755207,0.5401941,0.4577895,0.00007633189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019094501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003474744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76853186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027799228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057306253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4024255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}