{"meta":{"query_hash":"d5bdec11309e","filters":{"venue":"The Political Quarterly"},"cohort_total":36,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":36,"exported":36,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d5bdec11309e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Political+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1891222747","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2011.02202.x","title":"The Anglo‐Irish Agreement: 25 Years On","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Northern ireland; Politics; Agreement; Narrative; State (computer science); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Ethnology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03664698642313184,"score_gpt":0.29939544355406633,"score_spread":0.2627484571309345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891222747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12386328,0.00010497505,0.00001050583,0.013094855,0.00041733478,0.00016463242,0.0000088541565,0.00005466777,0.8622809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936904,0.000016932358,0.000013597475,0.0018690509,0.0005110278,0.000016115093,4.2833338e-7,0.000005647296,0.0038768053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855155,0.00020504811,0.00012894817,0.00012181112,0.00031556413,0.0006770581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992898,0.00029919314,0.000025023346,0.00020594586,0.00004538699,0.00013466855],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004313948,0.00007357253,0.00008494421,0.000013127772,0.0009307787,0.000091875336,0.00038654575,0.00004287158,0.00016618216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010590654,0.000043859996,0.00007213311,0.00009440701,0.00092720403,0.00005437906,0.000018591776,0.00013457167,0.0008141574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146568345,0.00006387217,0.00046438293,0.0000014661745,0.000026935286,0.000012100344,0.020145644,3.735373e-9,0.0000016798499,0.8105383,0.14713275,0.02159823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051850465,0.0012843909,0.17920476,0.00004147044,0.00007059208,0.0000051242214,0.1706255,0.0000042086904,0.000053542255,0.27258828,0.3751982,0.00040544252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005724828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007344834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8698271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004398418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003860511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975636062","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2007.00870.x","title":"Regulating Lobbyists: A Comparative Analysis of the United States, Canada, Germany and the European Union","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislation; Politics; Elite; European union; Democracy; Comparative politics; Political science; Ideal (ethics); Legislature; Public administration; Political system; Ideal type; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Business; International trade; Social science","score_opus":0.02086326939910659,"score_gpt":0.24850946207420438,"score_spread":0.22764619267509778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975636062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93759644,0.00001536289,0.00034789782,0.008533299,0.00005988239,0.00014984403,0.000014853401,0.00002263965,0.053259782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355334,3.5878904e-7,0.0000037818943,0.006118635,0.00019204972,0.0000018487102,0.000018863731,0.0000065572067,0.00010458784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985518,0.00021556637,0.0003692877,0.00013999136,0.0002673085,0.0004560899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987507,0.0005602662,0.00017099916,0.00032775832,0.00015868853,0.00003160721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011819646,0.0001389398,0.00023780731,0.00010136729,0.0002967615,0.00015189809,0.00033659412,0.000021219386,0.000017855647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004781705,0.00006396827,0.000084664585,0.0010167176,0.00090868113,0.00015830614,0.00006585116,0.0001698317,0.0000084607245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023535655,0.000012109327,0.0011568076,0.000014467494,0.00014045658,0.0000026152074,0.00040496475,0.00007938601,0.000025150803,0.99767494,0.00021690533,0.00024867928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010344685,0.000043082975,0.6655018,0.00007036777,0.0016499071,0.000005035661,0.041115943,0.03328643,0.00008105858,0.24812138,0.0087102195,0.00038034888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56700623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2318068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74955356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036492187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004110036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7822107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989795806","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2004.00606.x","title":"Stabilising Northern Ireland's Agreement","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Boycott; Queen (butterfly); Citation; Politics; Guardian; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016754255744936643,"score_gpt":0.2909936372031396,"score_spread":0.2742393814582029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989795806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7268496,0.00010535424,0.00019669437,0.04777264,0.00023222284,0.00016362384,0.0000067577116,0.00006882502,0.22460428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997966,0.0000040613386,0.000047043526,0.0010086988,0.000537793,0.000009159149,9.704859e-7,0.000005336225,0.0004209427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986983,0.00009819315,0.00013685545,0.00012445252,0.00031545418,0.00062672625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995056,0.00012246813,0.000019993498,0.00013393564,0.000064789834,0.00015324641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002754951,0.00007453282,0.00010100045,0.000014413044,0.00071689615,0.00009032449,0.00018982474,0.0000388416,0.00009064268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007777987,0.000052062096,0.000063665866,0.00008911212,0.00056503573,0.00008083796,0.000013329694,0.00010512285,0.00031974248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001431839,0.00019277158,0.005154036,0.000010002235,0.000046894267,0.000027913278,0.06174996,0.0000028021884,0.000036771915,0.91176695,0.0026306834,0.018366909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014659248,0.00088516483,0.03806925,0.00009567095,0.00009545776,0.000014508061,0.3136308,0.0000043090713,0.00013593056,0.6034878,0.041505873,0.0006093319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017029125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011118774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30827916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016460383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010535672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98951656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991189629","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02320.x","title":"The Professors on Public Life","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Normative; Compromise; Politics; Democracy; Public policy; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Competition (biology); Public life; Public administration; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political economy; Social science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.14307651408619157,"score_gpt":0.3881159447870278,"score_spread":0.24503943070083625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991189629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040728897,0.000063955005,0.000021608348,0.5263398,0.00080610777,0.00017581397,0.000006353947,0.00008948755,0.43176794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98006326,0.0000027793722,0.0000048595107,0.015607238,0.002934909,0.000028197626,7.437786e-7,0.000010354128,0.0013476792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996485,0.0009548051,0.00019253542,0.00011004031,0.00056030345,0.0016973062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954706,0.0030894883,0.00003040537,0.00035566415,0.000067290304,0.0009865799],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019094084,0.00010760558,0.00010482171,0.000019770096,0.0020328625,0.00016851051,0.0005619225,0.00013910323,0.00008951235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018764001,0.000054931374,0.0000941949,0.00014548308,0.0019440448,0.00020400534,0.000021534175,0.0005469284,0.0013492827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070333012,0.00006860816,0.00013484097,0.0000020563486,0.0000103332795,2.2465535e-7,0.0065348945,9.740224e-9,8.8762533e-7,0.99127805,0.0011407877,0.00082226325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072308154,0.00010957157,0.0017380172,0.000005110673,0.000011987259,5.4890654e-7,0.0151595455,0.000004272777,0.000006896796,0.8628257,0.11996578,0.00010027032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006747577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001472903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93933433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009396942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021483078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002931037","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2009.02030.x","title":"Britain's Oddest Election?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Parliament; Political science; Liberal Party; Politics; Primary election; General election; Order (exchange); Multi-party system; Split-ticket voting; Political economy; Public administration; Realigning election; Law; Sociology; Economics; Socialism; Democracy","score_opus":0.026221126503676896,"score_gpt":0.35261466332231406,"score_spread":0.32639353681863714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002931037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53535295,0.000039513838,0.00076364743,0.23247343,0.00040202762,0.0003925929,0.0000051662373,0.00027710223,0.23029356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936677,2.7862626e-7,0.000016464346,0.0031846634,0.0011341783,0.00000934684,0.0000014426286,0.0000048743254,0.0019810202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982517,0.00033505986,0.00018930389,0.0001282902,0.00028596303,0.00080969516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919045,0.00021822497,0.000024968274,0.00016666407,0.0000768865,0.00032279541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037965536,0.00008018242,0.00010912695,0.000024667406,0.0005470543,0.0001194412,0.0001720413,0.00007405631,0.00016248743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000131876,0.000057292982,0.00006677171,0.00018967073,0.00023734615,0.00012405482,0.0000023314124,0.00014270548,0.00040264288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003857619,0.000038604983,0.00033600652,0.0000011169775,0.0000030327947,0.0000010797014,0.001084802,1.098092e-7,0.00011647522,0.9937832,0.0010870383,0.0035447155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014840458,0.00067853223,0.029629609,0.00001139049,0.000023424622,0.000004177285,0.002078046,0.000052315405,0.00013578992,0.93860424,0.028453693,0.00018041035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015273329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026940687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45831478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011618457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008528849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008607371","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2014.12056.x","title":"How Do We Judge Policies?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Politics; Psychology; Work (physics); Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07527102430679838,"score_gpt":0.2876796919114031,"score_spread":0.2124086676046047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008607371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44639057,0.000020643982,0.0007846943,0.51268,0.0005336338,0.00011497249,0.000015645533,0.00010563669,0.039354198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792145,0.000002477982,0.00003241481,0.017839959,0.00048622675,0.000010205067,5.1635635e-7,0.0000097607,0.0024039415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985371,0.00021266955,0.000120929886,0.0002600421,0.00025393747,0.00061531004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990405,0.00035451932,0.000028532544,0.0003501588,0.000014443155,0.00021188146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013370137,0.0001239096,0.00012299656,0.000035843634,0.00017933002,0.00010721075,0.00040541275,0.000054113556,0.00007372433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011207695,0.00007507065,0.00008012569,0.000088683824,0.00045727895,0.00008850475,0.000023492135,0.0001825398,0.0008786499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008882593,0.00006049957,0.000026330832,0.0000035815622,0.0000018817838,0.0000021064416,0.000194296,1.5264816e-7,0.011266318,0.9789471,0.0029507603,0.006538112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043491388,0.0008067632,0.0044329674,0.000017732835,0.000014386007,0.00011005632,0.00048434356,0.00017583232,0.009708682,0.88888174,0.09470797,0.0002245912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031330917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024842502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5328239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023001068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009371635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019114704","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02412.x","title":"Freedom, Peace and Politics: Crick and Northern Ireland","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Appeal; Realism; Northern ireland; Certainty; Law; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Ethnology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014665744373656373,"score_gpt":0.28146454103494656,"score_spread":0.2667987966612902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019114704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87316597,0.001924452,0.00002553135,0.016661515,0.00019829848,0.000121572,0.00001430978,0.000048612255,0.107839726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679935,0.00003913117,0.00004304561,0.00074551546,0.0012889412,0.000006697731,7.0499954e-7,0.0000075182966,0.0010690698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986187,0.00014779076,0.00011385343,0.00011184466,0.00018590374,0.0008218786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913335,0.00033370208,0.000018878725,0.00010055681,0.000044561955,0.00036893543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030415453,0.0000912257,0.00012849514,0.00001868814,0.00068908266,0.00009495226,0.00009748907,0.0000573868,0.000029810639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117232805,0.00006539407,0.000028131495,0.000051183855,0.0011466182,0.00015192755,0.000026092175,0.00011506591,0.00005391381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005385121,0.000067115994,0.10040023,0.000017835853,0.000032399763,0.0000036540857,0.04215718,8.366562e-9,0.000008153292,0.8411847,0.01170079,0.0044225655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010744894,0.0005926931,0.50883484,0.000057542828,0.00022113904,0.00009885752,0.2226038,0.000022855314,0.000015550333,0.098049015,0.16765727,0.00077192177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010631578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012697305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74313563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031087417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027255726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024080825","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2007.02020.x","title":"What Britishness Means to the British","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Britishness; Citation; Politics; Library science; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016411811340316787,"score_gpt":0.30306996181812135,"score_spread":0.2866581504778046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024080825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38536593,0.00064962596,0.0061778417,0.2925182,0.0044081383,0.0011103312,0.00007346912,0.00024312215,0.30945334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758881,0.0000089292735,0.00002158167,0.011786912,0.002192577,0.00001914277,7.4804495e-7,0.000013109771,0.010068914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971332,0.00024974268,0.00028679386,0.000222482,0.0006553649,0.0014524434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982019,0.0007083552,0.000034252724,0.00032832733,0.000094566516,0.0006325637],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016047023,0.000103414575,0.00015973044,0.000011486928,0.0014552021,0.001669308,0.0007073068,0.00008826383,0.00009811002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030133134,0.00007376565,0.0001054377,0.00024600033,0.0006223161,0.000309738,0.000029224913,0.00020651407,0.00059891265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036821539,0.000025498784,0.00010069814,0.000002981498,0.000006382003,0.000019330893,0.004270114,1.04724045e-7,0.0000041942194,0.95742583,0.0050826897,0.033058465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013798733,0.000114245995,0.02700536,0.00011461126,0.00001554982,0.000039901406,0.031388886,0.0000060856037,0.000022938138,0.09146505,0.84947497,0.00021439546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24192354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23989867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86596084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015455476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008820086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029355217","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02410.x","title":"Introduction: <i>In Defence of Politics</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Hyperbole; Relevance (law); Argument (complex analysis); Disengagement theory; Passion; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029205695812089788,"score_gpt":0.3646205846411156,"score_spread":0.3354148888290258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029355217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73812795,0.00009206615,0.00017354546,0.12562032,0.00063596846,0.00020401612,0.000006451046,0.000029439863,0.13511023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626726,0.0000026726314,0.00007246536,0.00044832038,0.0025524201,0.000011844317,8.075674e-7,0.0000031317309,0.00064110267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696326,0.0003382883,0.00018935872,0.00010169561,0.00042775538,0.0019796155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984642,0.0004171891,0.00002293209,0.0001954273,0.00006434819,0.0008358761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018711848,0.000056514087,0.000096445045,0.000052876596,0.0002008278,0.00002781387,0.00029283031,0.00004611144,0.0005035969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094586745,0.00003976611,0.000042619562,0.000346585,0.0011465925,0.000297598,0.000011928849,0.00014277153,0.00020310779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000188367,0.00008920337,0.005568253,0.000003940041,0.0000012456022,1.0791941e-7,0.0064074155,4.943241e-8,0.000085459294,0.9861754,0.0005674097,0.0010996076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021373083,0.0002624158,0.13203163,0.000021321866,0.000015791427,0.000007896361,0.10595794,0.00002137894,0.0014867762,0.6704391,0.08928726,0.0002547244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009411969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035787784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3157363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024171626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030176793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99718446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032894945","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02365.x","title":"Feminising British Politics: Six Lessons from Devolution in Scotland and Wales","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Devolution (biology); House of Commons; Parliament; Scrutiny; Politics; Representation (politics); Public administration; Rhetorical question; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04219909511263973,"score_gpt":0.3489811596211205,"score_spread":0.3067820645084807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032894945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97180355,0.00039854832,0.00018279767,0.010490294,0.0002463134,0.000128475,0.000035223755,0.000029304163,0.016685491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984118,0.000012981648,0.00010393796,0.000341634,0.00084933476,0.0000069423427,0.000009333125,0.000008763189,0.0002552863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983414,0.0002734883,0.0001829837,0.0001413648,0.00022285806,0.0008379333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912393,0.0003819698,0.000028776503,0.00012111602,0.00002992827,0.0003142975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033703478,0.00007727086,0.00011554466,0.00003821111,0.00038408075,0.00016280578,0.00011337486,0.00009035056,0.000038662867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009821649,0.00007006208,0.000033259726,0.00007838336,0.0004973814,0.00019589443,0.000017923372,0.00013261591,0.000030228759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014185026,0.00004879484,0.049435165,0.000004255491,0.0000067525843,0.0000018791388,0.022132711,1.3153708e-7,0.00005241044,0.9260464,0.00008887293,0.00218123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002742117,0.000033708475,0.48053017,0.000039335802,0.000028256012,0.000009719331,0.09011682,0.000071779,0.000053129468,0.42724484,0.0014320215,0.00016602877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13363715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015431825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49880156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010192976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007089494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87213206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044201469","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2007.00883.x","title":"Growthism and the Green Backlash","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Environmentalism; Ideology; Politics; Hegemony; Neoliberalism (international relations); Faith; Mainstream; Sociology; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Political radicalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011788006926592426,"score_gpt":0.28362756750750034,"score_spread":0.2718395605809079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044201469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09469285,0.00007298565,0.00075786916,0.20129442,0.00026181014,0.00027214581,0.0000056447657,0.00007445281,0.7025678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98553574,0.0000031018958,0.000030568328,0.010012914,0.0007949006,0.000007331711,4.0813455e-7,0.0000060639095,0.0036089898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832666,0.0002754607,0.00019932215,0.00013748895,0.000186366,0.00087470363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973441,0.0020294886,0.00002480168,0.0002003705,0.000030474373,0.00037076577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019866277,0.00008823278,0.00013687063,0.00002132083,0.0006272152,0.00008508229,0.00031264563,0.000084685744,0.00015274058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001835585,0.00004757608,0.00007161118,0.00007859665,0.003200468,0.000111944115,0.0000268631,0.0002165561,0.00023334264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018391775,0.00001051482,0.00006348666,0.0000020824054,0.000008191841,0.0000020762855,0.0062299855,1.9693822e-9,0.0000015650382,0.9864611,0.0001768329,0.007025796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042418236,0.000050642364,0.0030397808,0.0000036316608,0.000021722328,0.000005303299,0.0096758045,0.000011263129,0.000010907762,0.91706085,0.06960845,0.00008748274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015692968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025696151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89084285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004668812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057577618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057585007","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02291.x","title":"The Cambusters: The Conservative European Union Referendum Rebellion of October 2011","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Negotiation; Referendum; Political science; Political economy; Credibility; European union; Prime minister; House of Commons; Government (linguistics); Commons; Law; Parliament; Sociology; Economics; Politics; International trade","score_opus":0.04621754284541335,"score_gpt":0.28629317715942787,"score_spread":0.24007563431401452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057585007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35053268,0.00030220428,0.00009279741,0.068884104,0.00094040815,0.00021105174,0.000021076834,0.000040529514,0.57897514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98895544,0.0000120423165,0.000005712182,0.0013544983,0.0007236901,0.0000048947136,0.0000015119796,0.0000080458,0.008934137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714833,0.0015752008,0.00025065895,0.000097153395,0.00016808303,0.0007605683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998404,0.0009298134,0.00007074075,0.000293757,0.000051588355,0.00025007167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002198041,0.00009530188,0.00011968765,0.00001405993,0.0010583106,0.000041343395,0.00043630385,0.000045897323,0.00017950113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092059585,0.000043809006,0.000089807305,0.000051020237,0.001852288,0.00013857256,0.000024137258,0.00019403173,0.0006948738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008436901,0.00003188315,0.00030250187,0.0000022409497,0.000014043434,2.4244275e-7,0.014079343,3.0713732e-8,0.00001180128,0.97626585,0.0061830697,0.0031005752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021648569,0.00020417995,0.032302793,0.00001786121,0.00005876118,0.0000037548011,0.06076197,0.000015848158,0.00004872486,0.08074754,0.82543397,0.00018808454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074136704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000924845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8955183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008020792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062982195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057866268","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02262.x","title":"Scotland Out the Union? The Rise and Rise of the Nationalist Agenda","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Scots; Parliament; Home rule; Nationalism; Politics; Political science; Independence (probability theory); State (computer science); Political economy; General election; Devolution (biology); Economic history; Law; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.027750754533826527,"score_gpt":0.3157348991739638,"score_spread":0.2879841446401373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057866268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6744022,0.0013327157,0.00009274324,0.22447953,0.0009880136,0.0006184758,0.00015985266,0.000029123054,0.09789737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453354,0.0000049898763,0.0000030352621,0.0011599326,0.00085487665,0.0000154607,2.5016044e-7,0.0000063218317,0.003421585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975848,0.0009914744,0.00021213086,0.00009699708,0.00051597,0.000598613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982524,0.0010925531,0.000084025836,0.00034403402,0.00006249471,0.00016447144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015164143,0.00009366063,0.00011785674,0.0000070375036,0.0008588397,0.000079782825,0.00053105224,0.000056592962,0.000054936383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034692386,0.000034411878,0.0000862541,0.000108384185,0.002126304,0.00011413008,0.00004411047,0.00018586632,0.00004163625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023359444,0.000025670644,0.005297094,0.0000044865997,0.000011559646,1.0183296e-7,0.009376377,6.542917e-8,0.000010164962,0.9830398,0.0018273818,0.0004049816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023712128,0.000053710588,0.2794131,0.000036041904,0.00006720488,0.0000070670776,0.010755332,0.00003878537,0.000052791675,0.16419482,0.5450006,0.00014337528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027231146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035240452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.818845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005367998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008646079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9792466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071074136","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2010.02082.x","title":"Hung Parliaments and the Challenges for Westminster and Whitehall: How to Make Minority and Multiparty Governance Work (with Commentaries by Turnbull, Beith, Evans and Crick)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Opposition (politics); Politics; Corporate governance; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.014756803414559486,"score_gpt":0.2635157237185566,"score_spread":0.2487589203039971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071074136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7695498,0.0011265114,0.000057885507,0.22666526,0.00011084927,0.000721301,0.00015413956,0.000018710374,0.0015955534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541795,0.00008728088,0.00017078205,0.003150818,0.00024003691,0.00010079384,7.893074e-7,0.000010822469,0.00082070444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984027,0.00016501073,0.00016006186,0.00031682145,0.00027734225,0.0006780386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978509,0.0014339845,0.000063799656,0.00018463416,0.00004231072,0.000424392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000526434,0.00018544274,0.0002752802,0.000008015406,0.0005870616,0.0003513373,0.00017002746,0.00009464786,0.0000040053433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019895198,0.00010027605,0.000026654716,0.000043992277,0.0018682323,0.00015362159,0.00004856647,0.00020996244,0.0000012755794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012784735,0.000040862014,0.01166253,0.0000465612,0.000032870987,0.0000010394775,0.014992773,4.368905e-9,0.00002761787,0.9637359,0.0012777842,0.008054254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048136776,0.0012441764,0.4118644,0.0002101044,0.00022029087,0.000029922738,0.030681258,0.000055544202,0.00005010065,0.060070563,0.48997626,0.00078372046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013267119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031782977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9036653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026973863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020818276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078636178","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2006.00817.x","title":"After Number Ten: What Do Former Prime Ministers Do?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Politics; Council of Ministers; Prime (order theory); Quarter (Canadian coin); Memoir; Speculation; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Management; Economics; History; Finance; Economic policy","score_opus":0.010505651457461407,"score_gpt":0.2642237911652937,"score_spread":0.2537181397078323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078636178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49336946,0.00020322623,0.00003707721,0.018638643,0.0006932922,0.0001496234,0.000014690406,0.00006555078,0.48682842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765679,0.000004862959,0.00003926207,0.003022647,0.001198587,0.000029054529,0.000002372879,0.000011941233,0.019123333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981134,0.00012711427,0.00026598963,0.00022387126,0.00021385218,0.0010558051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913067,0.00020193217,0.000031876843,0.00024326751,0.00003083724,0.00036139658],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002770031,0.00014171413,0.00018292177,0.000022968923,0.0004392186,0.00033589802,0.00027413157,0.000111905225,0.0025960775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016259992,0.00009995173,0.00016215871,0.000055924174,0.0010520513,0.00042852171,0.000013744532,0.0001434012,0.0033083844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002083449,0.00006464027,0.00077234104,0.0000044148355,0.000010282892,0.000007129675,0.00437241,3.0283594e-8,0.000005395422,0.98703074,0.0031040628,0.0046077226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026372133,0.00010094148,0.0043924474,0.000029917064,0.000044014545,0.000008954942,0.015649477,0.0000049980713,0.000022496255,0.39827564,0.58091104,0.0002963623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036285827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005080612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5887551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016645735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009231546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086950491","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12113","title":"An Invidious Position? The Public Dance of the Promiscuous Partisan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Politics; Power (physics); Position (finance); Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Dance; Presidential system; Service (business); Public service; Sociology; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.016384823599877696,"score_gpt":0.27192279458068114,"score_spread":0.25553797098080344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086950491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7982921,0.000031357646,0.000116793,0.117919035,0.00049058895,0.00022158939,0.000015098729,0.00004504354,0.08286839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945615,7.329268e-7,0.000009441147,0.0039490173,0.0005869172,0.000019178517,9.0904575e-7,0.0000064922847,0.00086582045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811953,0.000677267,0.00022193597,0.00014511298,0.00021024827,0.0006259207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988609,0.0002995913,0.0000569452,0.0004694463,0.000042403906,0.00027070483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007367755,0.00008729659,0.00013580316,0.000012179303,0.0010113795,0.0000791695,0.0007743133,0.00005954196,0.00012094442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013321653,0.000041234518,0.00010594724,0.00008002606,0.0018833373,0.00013346365,0.00001677641,0.00016205022,0.00010634239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003588848,0.00005457534,0.00031914917,0.0000029930804,0.000006321399,1.7009778e-7,0.0051674554,2.430189e-7,0.000054302993,0.9914019,0.00061360386,0.0023756942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027254812,0.00046857056,0.016257826,0.00001621227,0.000047709636,0.000009975427,0.009498808,0.00040532497,0.00015020109,0.80283964,0.16981736,0.00021584162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002216017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014712473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19626938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007162601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012767245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7778816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091349722","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2007.00834.x","title":"<i>De facto</i> Veto? The Parliamentary Liberal Democrats","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; De facto; Political science; Power (physics); Constitution; General election; Liberal Party; Law; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017748775498026483,"score_gpt":0.30414401789485457,"score_spread":0.28639524239682806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091349722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71881574,0.00010828528,0.001155464,0.09216754,0.0006099365,0.00036339246,0.00003873857,0.0001171263,0.18662377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816066,0.0000020796356,0.00003590875,0.013137123,0.0015300905,0.000011034292,9.450817e-7,0.0000113910355,0.0036648337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725467,0.0003236701,0.00026667846,0.00016647464,0.00048705027,0.0015014857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809307,0.0010485285,0.000049365157,0.00029940563,0.000035509285,0.00047411505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013319268,0.00012531584,0.00014285692,0.000011702634,0.000736132,0.00016244523,0.00054523477,0.00009245852,0.00015561674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012120908,0.00006883155,0.00011508371,0.00012858048,0.0008538007,0.00012224671,0.000020093268,0.00028428726,0.00026219958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009242768,0.0000332665,0.0018974001,0.0000028077982,0.000011605272,0.000008500645,0.0049509853,7.2571666e-8,0.000052384636,0.9846271,0.004498386,0.0039082044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028846363,0.00023724424,0.09522952,0.000031686166,0.00004168591,0.000018171906,0.021575734,0.00001847197,0.00023423083,0.484275,0.39774498,0.0003047777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05331017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049025114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50035214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023198925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013610937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9529939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114834283","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12074","title":"Public Life as Tragedy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Injustice; Politics; Witness; Betrayal; Cynicism; Sympathy; Id, ego and super-ego; Perspective (graphical); Conscience; Sociology; Power (physics); Public life; Aesthetics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.05172147514538897,"score_gpt":0.3161757361737835,"score_spread":0.26445426102839453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114834283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4493559,0.000012243974,0.00057383685,0.15413897,0.00058175484,0.00021575978,0.0000052995524,0.000233022,0.39488322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98207897,5.081505e-7,0.000040628922,0.014007823,0.0009941312,0.00001540805,0.0000021053693,0.00001390198,0.0028465379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972893,0.0007004489,0.00021904113,0.00020508892,0.00057307817,0.0010130344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819773,0.0004292634,0.00004159313,0.00036463735,0.00005890705,0.00090787513],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010165824,0.0001174463,0.00015252747,0.00004382718,0.0006925057,0.00023401127,0.000628726,0.00009249863,0.00060989655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012437373,0.000079746416,0.00008958638,0.0001568881,0.0005980127,0.00020970499,0.00001750376,0.00020970893,0.0018755104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022695165,0.000046787372,0.00025537115,0.0000018681126,0.000010706366,0.0000010188182,0.0053884787,2.655251e-8,0.000020074382,0.9892093,0.0019828589,0.0030812533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029303244,0.00026374235,0.0040018074,0.000008087042,0.000021759737,0.0000012596163,0.0069476836,0.00004847398,0.000034560246,0.8180564,0.17012194,0.00020126559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056081363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009215447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53272307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093932205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024284149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124608452","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2007.00852.x","title":"Being British: A Crisis of Identity?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Britishness; Scots; Parliament; Politics; Scots law; National identity; Home rule; Identity (music); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Public law","score_opus":0.014747230664546836,"score_gpt":0.3145040482960762,"score_spread":0.29975681763152934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124608452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75083506,0.0000892792,0.0050390363,0.010175122,0.0003590949,0.00016785522,0.000022205375,0.000057203943,0.23325516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737906,0.0000018791468,0.000052620875,0.0010011623,0.0005400666,0.0000026334478,3.076982e-7,0.0000065389236,0.0010157173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981389,0.00012570752,0.0003008711,0.0001240816,0.00050259806,0.00080785615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901193,0.0003914087,0.000052286407,0.00017441945,0.0000785697,0.0002914082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011232697,0.00006256475,0.00015496269,0.000019258589,0.00025315164,0.00008780086,0.00033576274,0.000071374525,0.00011845587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022980022,0.000054054264,0.0001016868,0.00017345719,0.0004904254,0.0002286308,0.000015470188,0.00011279067,0.00007740409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002493087,0.000028039607,0.00094371795,0.000008186307,0.000007162446,0.000008053462,0.0028228755,9.365219e-9,0.000035409987,0.99410576,0.00036031555,0.0016779607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019806687,0.00013824648,0.07309105,0.00006579905,0.000029434252,0.000011587834,0.020328943,0.0000037613486,0.00018965002,0.87694746,0.028819855,0.00017617067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27829868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03332396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24654403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008484775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005931895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98431534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152422646","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2009.02001.x","title":"Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Strengths and weaknesses; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Behavioural economics; Political science; Nudge theory; Public policy; Positive economics; Contrast (vision); Public economics; Public administration; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04526367010438347,"score_gpt":0.37897163435536,"score_spread":0.33370796425097654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152422646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8387136,0.00006926523,0.004799451,0.10752409,0.00061924284,0.001088525,0.000044132827,0.00035783503,0.046783894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99179757,3.1671314e-7,0.00009274735,0.005676377,0.0011839037,0.000038444872,0.00000845369,0.000013851766,0.0011883482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971379,0.000318051,0.00032576424,0.00022846904,0.00037594978,0.0016138387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874586,0.00043588222,0.000061560626,0.00025927817,0.00012536037,0.00037208907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009018993,0.00016794619,0.00022700796,0.00006035365,0.00097032427,0.00032924846,0.00032227262,0.00011843075,0.00009769902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009317053,0.00012125158,0.00015106409,0.00021754164,0.0002693357,0.00032413425,0.000008301556,0.00019194632,0.000119229015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099259005,0.000060449773,0.00017335155,0.0000062226436,0.0000072263942,0.0000013437766,0.018392615,6.626366e-7,0.00010679862,0.97950596,0.00085124094,0.0008841824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037293587,0.00067414046,0.0040416364,0.00001552513,0.00006311349,0.0000022503577,0.030868318,0.0002390324,0.00008760045,0.96176857,0.001618079,0.00024880032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00813454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002622857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.153084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000133091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019004049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153731501","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2008.00908.x","title":"Taking ‘Big Government Conservatism’ Seriously? The Bush Presidency Reconsidered","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Presidency; Administration (probate law); Government (linguistics); Presidential system; Political science; Big government; Ideology; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07335011854811861,"score_gpt":0.27587586841086303,"score_spread":0.2025257498627444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153731501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6330216,0.0001399576,0.00006853617,0.07261929,0.0007040014,0.00024885783,0.000024772582,0.00008264707,0.29309034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98323476,0.000015656247,0.000039028135,0.0070972987,0.00084754,0.000026840635,6.816883e-7,0.000010553713,0.008727619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978942,0.00033211667,0.00031121363,0.00020931933,0.00035521324,0.00089789473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998351,0.0008673636,0.00008345153,0.0003329401,0.000031541036,0.0003337283],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000461372,0.00013534068,0.00019077491,0.00001082624,0.0018299922,0.00006610141,0.00044551142,0.00008336565,0.00092879974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002734987,0.000083806524,0.0001247188,0.000063558204,0.0017126892,0.000113429436,0.000023214827,0.00022516711,0.0004905271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012415554,0.000038665075,0.0014270985,0.000004259224,0.000022474103,0.0000162941,0.016662333,2.8286723e-7,0.000014666431,0.97024417,0.0072393916,0.004317933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006254091,0.0003503922,0.067435004,0.000043896147,0.00007787414,0.00012013586,0.038764007,0.000104481114,0.00008802519,0.521234,0.37057808,0.00057874114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016178662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004024936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44901022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024978572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027120917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158666893","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02276.x","title":"Fight, Flee or Fulminate: Prime Ministerial Challengers, Strategic Choices and the Rites of Succession","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Prime (order theory); Reputation; Prime minister; Work (physics); Political science; Council of Ministers; Law; Public relations; Public administration; Management; Business; Politics; Economics; Engineering; Economic policy","score_opus":0.0734428854914521,"score_gpt":0.36190910638523754,"score_spread":0.28846622089378543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158666893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8548781,0.0006807101,0.000011189336,0.057663042,0.0007890538,0.00060075853,0.00006964404,0.00005336865,0.08525409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662197,0.000027762588,0.000025695681,0.00045503027,0.001221433,0.000015659612,0.0000036265774,0.000009936043,0.0016188889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774534,0.00063727115,0.0003186186,0.00013929824,0.0003220595,0.0008374046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819225,0.0010522496,0.00010687544,0.0002624092,0.000052675634,0.0003335621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090424845,0.00014218279,0.0002558572,0.000029157762,0.000599945,0.00015025516,0.00036899454,0.00011842081,0.00029487466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006508058,0.00006992797,0.00007806721,0.000083626175,0.0016281283,0.0001819018,0.000029841052,0.00018210617,0.000017029999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105895975,0.00006608998,0.000115416966,0.00002637995,0.000014546733,8.209668e-7,0.01716293,5.508774e-9,0.000035500976,0.9815156,0.00013913741,0.000817681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042616,0.0013441526,0.012718537,0.0001836415,0.00029902987,0.000033439646,0.16253099,0.0000999387,0.0006762403,0.7534028,0.06365658,0.0007930438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007253906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012074565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22811279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031645468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011753919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401708290","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12259","title":"Alternatives to <scp>EU</scp> Membership and the Rational Imagination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Regional Development and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Brexit; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Democratic legitimacy; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; European union; Economics; International trade; Law; History","score_opus":0.02393039012223831,"score_gpt":0.3216253630477409,"score_spread":0.2976949729255026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2401708290","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17915298,0.000032367236,0.0005879104,0.6548555,0.0001749888,0.0002900572,0.0000085860065,0.000037680118,0.16485994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821411,0.000007489506,0.000061430415,0.006524729,0.000658291,0.000029399102,8.9171914e-7,0.000004785586,0.010571898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987121,0.0003558978,0.00011882287,0.00011703497,0.0003407527,0.00035534386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972026,0.0024279363,0.000028316712,0.000094211384,0.000077187404,0.00016974955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066693366,0.00007289604,0.00007884395,0.000034983208,0.00036878558,0.00011183193,0.00023164076,0.000028193283,0.000057466426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057281135,0.00003185349,0.000035456404,0.00009326299,0.0009765908,0.00017410878,0.00001548508,0.000052133328,0.00024547937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005513956,0.000005830394,0.00024549896,8.1665024e-7,0.000008909234,2.990246e-7,0.019588185,1.899432e-8,0.000030293058,0.9736022,0.003525065,0.0029874062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044459078,0.000039079827,0.01829782,0.0000125350325,0.000008793305,0.0000020583998,0.005277831,0.000008475621,0.000087482986,0.860898,0.114880875,0.00004242595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011052041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002306802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8029881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052416333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009411072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35982895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532550934","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12310","title":"Waiting for the New Era of Trade Negotiations to Begin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; International trade; Law and economics; Economics; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.062179318110131644,"score_gpt":0.23998537989744112,"score_spread":0.17780606178730948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532550934","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26615328,0.00027858937,0.06536895,0.65443224,0.00064753904,0.0007011527,0.0008302362,0.000043985194,0.011544071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964893,0.0000041930252,0.00036170078,0.0024189916,0.00034386333,0.000022618446,0.0000013505544,0.00001224602,0.00034576486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990065,0.00000777631,0.0004007309,0.00016194621,0.000018031358,0.00040500355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988918,0.0005693631,0.0000859096,0.00030448142,0.000008121601,0.0001403324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020102607,0.00008606137,0.00018893738,0.000027959673,0.000096563585,0.000034252305,0.0003068996,0.000041127645,0.00010842658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010262947,0.00005075688,0.00013219613,0.000067140245,0.000069079695,0.000084880594,0.000011290979,0.000063872714,0.00030234773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068555173,0.000015171396,0.00046963312,0.0000032961589,0.000024525698,4.878665e-8,0.0004287266,0.000005309773,0.000027516879,0.9910998,0.0028912541,0.0050278883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064276694,0.00033622578,0.01819352,0.000020132129,0.000021008298,0.0000036672704,0.0008752864,0.0013686896,0.00026954786,0.9045569,0.07351997,0.00019228723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041788348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005704094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.730336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041314157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002183456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38861692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579520256","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12329","title":"A Lib Dem Perspective on Centre‐Left Politics Post‐2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Political science; New Left; Political crisis; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.024141664039046475,"score_gpt":0.3281492250316132,"score_spread":0.3040075609925667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579520256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1553219,0.000027562619,0.000011668406,0.23693796,0.00060320605,0.00013839983,0.000059012957,0.00007530997,0.606825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745613,0.0000020606399,0.000025590722,0.0049358844,0.0015419049,0.0000031552345,0.0000015080607,0.000014064756,0.018914567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978153,0.0001932491,0.00019968532,0.00027509316,0.0002533427,0.0012633336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980706,0.00035653252,0.000067135596,0.0005861305,0.00012935752,0.0007902364],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033056652,0.00016252494,0.00021723255,0.00003672822,0.0026357716,0.0002714344,0.00077962223,0.00012291374,0.00050097716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005026505,0.00011966155,0.0001702604,0.000016030459,0.0017759891,0.00019284397,0.000031289277,0.00026505275,0.0022369465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013126114,0.00007414177,0.0001460924,0.0000023532928,0.000017094062,0.0000075431585,0.01464845,6.290566e-8,0.0000046487903,0.98260695,0.0020075692,0.00047198514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003570712,0.0003139059,0.0058830366,0.000022004842,0.000041168918,0.000005249614,0.04798001,0.00003148354,0.000022142676,0.79901737,0.1460356,0.00029097393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021463443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027550922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8192394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005390836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002538717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808341443","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12527","title":"Obamacare in the Trump Era: Where are we Now, and Where are we Going?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Repeal; Presidency; Opposition (politics); Politics; Legislature; Retrenchment; Legislation; Veto; Political science; Public administration; Law; State (computer science); Political economy; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.029011244217391353,"score_gpt":0.2875896856440256,"score_spread":0.2585784414266342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808341443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39802623,0.001409185,0.000013716275,0.46531022,0.0005011073,0.00026578078,0.00006547614,0.00006978622,0.1343385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915142,0.00018156736,0.000013431524,0.0034940538,0.0014371601,0.000017932642,7.784865e-7,0.000011493169,0.003329361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978954,0.00036747815,0.0002613943,0.00027706358,0.00022045337,0.0009781657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988498,0.00041986626,0.000059315462,0.00028883538,0.000043622324,0.00033853741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046504,0.00017017486,0.00025321185,0.000037912418,0.00083631155,0.00015251315,0.00049255573,0.00014684122,0.00047615592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036148034,0.00010486771,0.00009296276,0.000107776286,0.0016730961,0.00015774324,0.000024633096,0.00033457592,0.0005894622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029368945,0.00008367119,0.0061797784,0.00005174855,0.00001649626,0.000019038876,0.04424336,5.729485e-8,0.0000041537014,0.8999141,0.04535045,0.004107806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033754346,0.000267602,0.011669179,0.00014175607,0.000026567299,0.000009780126,0.11814828,0.000056336245,0.0000029725657,0.21109763,0.65799713,0.000245201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024515968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057685237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6888164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001385548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000964116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95950955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893483995","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12581","title":"From Maggie to May: Forty Years of (De)industrial Strategy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Receipt; State (computer science); Industrial policy; Prime minister; Economic interventionism; Principal (computer security); Economics; Intervention (counseling); Theme (computing); Pledge; Economy; Political economy; Economic policy; Sociology; Political science; Market economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06870832941980755,"score_gpt":0.33213624930413366,"score_spread":0.2634279198843261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893483995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8602069,0.0000059464614,0.00006870291,0.0070146634,0.000403611,0.00009119189,0.0000694675,0.000027040995,0.13211246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936828,2.9195914e-7,0.00005311513,0.0011249819,0.0030115615,0.000004121142,0.0000015201042,0.0000056726453,0.002115957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879324,0.000118641794,0.00019055378,0.00013483936,0.00013322449,0.00062950276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909514,0.00023158234,0.000025404355,0.00017569531,0.000029114095,0.0004430468],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003017591,0.00006501558,0.00014638394,0.000024006837,0.00017056872,0.000031820902,0.00029259842,0.00009536067,0.0012512414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009471777,0.000053494565,0.000071822855,0.000057545894,0.00083288073,0.00005883736,0.000012560948,0.000100570716,0.0007468507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003469892,0.000036696765,0.0001717216,0.000001007214,0.000013343716,0.0000021419469,0.009787007,1.0841388e-7,0.00006444529,0.96205866,0.0069465484,0.020883616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043287323,0.00096594985,0.0076629925,0.000017952641,0.000039410326,0.0000010132031,0.02103356,0.000028449609,0.00020750704,0.6930726,0.27631992,0.00021775778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041764468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015269975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2693734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011097606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023565699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922529635","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12649","title":"Brexit and the Future of the <scp>UK</scp>'s Unbalanced Economic Geography","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; Economic geography; International trade; Geography; Economy; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.00367740220507148,"score_gpt":0.22787719824039138,"score_spread":0.2241997960353199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922529635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639941,0.0004831883,0.000010530112,0.015754482,0.0004871126,0.00030729122,0.0000140596285,0.000019176945,0.018930083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977298,0.000048506365,0.000007205446,0.00071108603,0.0006514987,0.000010391028,4.9895056e-7,0.0000052188884,0.0008357893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989567,0.00023205386,0.00016028702,0.0001300204,0.00017113231,0.00034985106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898875,0.00057431747,0.0000736553,0.00026696024,0.000033312794,0.000063031715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041685192,0.000092244736,0.00016784678,0.000018542152,0.00045164558,0.0000607159,0.00034028143,0.000051476734,0.00003587889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028012711,0.0000416627,0.00012160244,0.00008049902,0.001249592,0.00005723272,0.000024752126,0.00012534797,0.00003824288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027178853,0.000006828354,0.018716834,0.0000055153396,0.000028319839,5.8525707e-8,0.09869403,5.0367015e-7,0.0000034075608,0.8817074,0.00068664347,0.00014777508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083768653,0.000086200846,0.3633798,0.000017863673,0.000061055325,0.0000014030095,0.042010356,0.000030323283,0.000023162936,0.57854074,0.014954998,0.000056390807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013769351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007829754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34466296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023620642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007617061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99279803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986491246","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12778","title":"Brexit, Cabinet Norms and the Ministerial Code: Are we Living in a post‐Nolan Era?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; Cabinet (room); Political science; Order (exchange); Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); General election; Code (set theory); Law; Public administration; Politics; History; Economics; European union; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01575673298141173,"score_gpt":0.25923699790014454,"score_spread":0.2434802649187328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986491246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8905736,0.00008098488,0.000003148252,0.062369995,0.00045277041,0.00021949057,0.00002731036,0.000024860838,0.046247803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942096,0.0000060695747,0.000006264048,0.0026191736,0.000467416,0.000012130923,0.0000010028681,0.0000074289405,0.0026709307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985484,0.00024401156,0.00022366595,0.0001838183,0.0001323605,0.0006677776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988562,0.0006777205,0.000039998693,0.00019051951,0.00001574129,0.0002198619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055713643,0.00010966029,0.0002311551,0.000028647073,0.00029427535,0.00010976014,0.00028054015,0.00008225014,0.00038540683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008513277,0.00006246573,0.00006995946,0.00004837782,0.0010775194,0.00010635969,0.000027561755,0.0002012769,0.00029653386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059213166,0.00003055199,0.0012811873,0.000011677297,0.000007756895,0.0000025499398,0.024060322,1.7322174e-7,0.000008159231,0.9740076,0.00010482364,0.00042599777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043368204,0.0007751664,0.11135432,0.00026582362,0.00006945514,0.000035902587,0.119694896,0.00031367713,0.0000074607733,0.68042314,0.08198818,0.0007351744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012096354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00855668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29358447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011954971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013741702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99448216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043092936","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12884","title":"Welfare‐Consequentialism: A Vaccine for Populism?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Consequentialism; Ideology; Welfare; Political economy; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04651330772237847,"score_gpt":0.3354913549506612,"score_spread":0.2889780472282827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043092936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15437266,0.000048178183,0.0024901323,0.82452214,0.0008393868,0.0010885093,0.00014119344,0.00038030665,0.016117465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98033047,8.619828e-7,0.00029540792,0.017300397,0.0013848775,0.00006164867,0.000013772556,0.000024424797,0.0005881659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771005,0.00027204983,0.00032024525,0.0002988829,0.00041076765,0.0009879785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878174,0.00022517386,0.00006514237,0.00026163418,0.00008559747,0.00058070564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038271717,0.00016167278,0.00023511694,0.00002973326,0.00096219796,0.00015474713,0.0006285957,0.00010233492,0.00040039056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031477798,0.0001168378,0.00016557043,0.00018533067,0.0002455907,0.00016640674,0.000026392197,0.00016740845,0.00020489134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003545814,0.000033629214,0.00008540957,0.000011012683,0.000028183073,0.000004757007,0.010333772,1.3613237e-7,0.00014259669,0.98308665,0.005202283,0.0010361042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015491728,0.000803784,0.001526844,0.000020212641,0.0001671839,0.0000031212671,0.020805176,0.00020984841,0.00033948917,0.49152526,0.48255566,0.00049426587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054548825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079857564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8259578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009766346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115869334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8246187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081520643","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.12902","title":"Resource Extraction, Economic Growth, and the Climate Dilemma in Canada and Australia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Commodity; Natural resource; Politics; Climate change; Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Development economics; Political economy; Political science; Natural resource economics; Market economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.011242123135141023,"score_gpt":0.2050962143496036,"score_spread":0.19385409121446256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081520643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98410785,0.000034449335,0.000023193097,0.012157277,0.00004655849,0.000087091976,0.000009491777,0.000027514965,0.0035065734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992733,0.000004703522,0.000007581768,0.0005762933,0.00009895789,0.000007861962,9.0094346e-7,0.000009062015,0.000021365066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938977,0.000046806705,0.00014207885,0.00009392731,0.00005091157,0.00027653528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962884,0.00015932783,0.000009849293,0.00009029293,0.0000018720948,0.00010982206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000087733104,0.00008016587,0.00010423905,0.000011337383,0.000048234906,0.0000410075,0.00008161242,0.000018053031,0.000020536352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008354896,0.00004838057,0.000012894645,0.00002443324,0.00008870398,0.000020991154,0.000015013124,0.00014336266,0.000010736056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011047209,0.000008691951,0.012728164,0.0002939163,0.00009915558,0.000045149292,0.008935296,0.001997711,0.00006611531,0.9664566,0.0059709884,0.0032877324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00891587,0.0006175347,0.42324635,0.00018916604,0.00037218473,0.00021200793,0.07380744,0.3856627,0.00042018748,0.014821734,0.08986969,0.0018651204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35940167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.115227185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049824586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001065281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9009176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212699660","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.13075","title":"<scp>UK‐US</scp> Trade Relations and ‘Global Britain’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Brexit; Referendum; Prime minister; Independence (probability theory); International trade; European union; Political science; Economics; Political economy; International economics; Economic history; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01638246781056149,"score_gpt":0.26647770059356674,"score_spread":0.2500952327830053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212699660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53332037,0.00023515883,0.000066613335,0.025686273,0.00023289611,0.000056249624,0.00005583364,0.000047324902,0.44029927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892252,0.0000056596487,0.000055808647,0.0031513812,0.0004530493,0.000005369006,0.0000041320986,0.0000045814104,0.0070948154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864906,0.00017745722,0.00017638704,0.00018536243,0.00013287438,0.00067885785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988373,0.0004785995,0.00001911895,0.00015086419,0.00001872092,0.0004954268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020563026,0.00008703753,0.00013911568,0.000011650785,0.00070342777,0.0000949913,0.00013771578,0.00009247906,0.00017002693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023206352,0.00007285142,0.000081223094,0.00008609177,0.000772796,0.00009409579,0.0000136810495,0.00013853716,0.00020700788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8298065e-7,0.00002682779,0.0011518744,0.000002491843,0.000009665277,0.000008219485,0.0032329152,1.06653324e-7,0.0000037464567,0.98984593,0.004654573,0.001063065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018389418,0.000054372133,0.036721453,0.000007523243,0.000034530745,0.000021396463,0.019002909,0.000033846252,0.000006850218,0.6081125,0.33575705,0.000063679465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020379655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001095093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45590484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001327902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020621963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5410269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241573336","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2009.02145.x","title":"Parties, Pressure Groups and the British Political Process","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CBC (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Citation; Sociology; Media studies; General election; Political process; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01066561876954709,"score_gpt":0.2790966946205608,"score_spread":0.2684310758510137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241573336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3704813,0.0014644279,0.00023517419,0.3287622,0.00038541356,0.0010367179,0.00009023503,0.00023596405,0.29730856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98793036,0.000005694221,0.0000061443725,0.00786572,0.0011506068,0.00003121221,8.8664365e-7,0.000008682826,0.0030006925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687904,0.00052655145,0.00030106702,0.00025263187,0.00056730764,0.0014733783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835706,0.0006555482,0.00004928199,0.0002698795,0.00007922851,0.0005890085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007569237,0.00014161304,0.00028021753,0.000008559902,0.0013414393,0.0007650273,0.00045602937,0.00012163076,0.00005566748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045185917,0.000087169115,0.00009490967,0.00012182624,0.002393382,0.0001906454,0.000016299748,0.00029279458,0.00004033099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020009747,0.00004005663,0.00015768563,0.00001063829,0.000012076119,0.0000065973,0.0026191878,5.333792e-8,0.0000010561608,0.99485606,0.0007595519,0.001517026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006141873,0.00015752217,0.011922912,0.000048361897,0.000060863014,0.000045020985,0.006391889,0.00008391547,0.0000056884865,0.9307943,0.049694523,0.00018084409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054721285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030816195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61744905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049035967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012407312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353090786","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.13238","title":"What is wrong with government in the <scp>US</scp>, <scp>UK</scp>, France and Canada?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Government (linguistics); Politics; Library science; Inclusion (mineral); Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; History; Operations research; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Philosophy; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013091699322777582,"score_gpt":0.2743321925313594,"score_spread":0.2612404932085818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353090786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.910643,0.00023438931,0.0000022030054,0.04844003,0.00024479377,0.00028451346,0.000050689745,0.00004465904,0.040055763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97662294,0.000061780294,0.0000057670686,0.010797523,0.0005667251,0.000041760664,0.000002105063,0.00001379268,0.011887624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970652,0.00033344328,0.00020533144,0.00025640934,0.001021055,0.0011185923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970016,0.0023373205,0.000048415466,0.0003074871,0.00003124297,0.00027395712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000626279,0.00018020961,0.00020201835,0.000023054128,0.00048386367,0.00039704356,0.0005209774,0.00008102799,0.000017179933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018521454,0.000100621,0.00004144255,0.00034821234,0.00059440796,0.00026158436,0.000030350082,0.00028701642,0.000084620726],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028885834,0.000052610743,0.026952604,0.000032745826,0.000045576147,0.0000750077,0.3151269,0.000001646347,0.000020165875,0.60291374,0.053318497,0.001457625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003374401,0.0002646384,0.07812036,0.00007046103,0.0000318909,0.000007194999,0.36976057,0.00006205242,0.0000948887,0.024834413,0.5263478,0.00006829816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7616225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7280452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5780793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014935405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027606756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41032055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388201416","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.13333","title":"From Donald Dewar to Humza Yousaf: The Role of Scotland's First Ministers and the Importance of Political Leadership","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Coalition government; Element (criminal law); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political economy; Conservative government; Relevance (law); Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.048385281691115105,"score_gpt":0.24974517374733934,"score_spread":0.20135989205622423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388201416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9182469,0.0002887746,0.000005722137,0.063315876,0.00027411612,0.00027096944,0.00026893485,0.000035622645,0.017293045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591994,0.0000010839427,0.00000487611,0.0024313873,0.00056425686,0.00002105343,0.000010964964,0.00001072136,0.0010357002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986636,0.00015188752,0.0003229311,0.00015669897,0.00032018227,0.00038469094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775594,0.0016867458,0.00006660254,0.0002998014,0.00007905436,0.00011183906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040696352,0.00011237174,0.00021174068,0.000047282374,0.0003377434,0.000066004635,0.0003558747,0.000035426525,0.0003289669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012751392,0.00005791288,0.000109433466,0.00005937031,0.0019357234,0.00007911937,0.000035971698,0.00013958693,0.00011221058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008832974,0.000025523914,0.0008094652,0.000014913211,0.000039307233,0.0000012704443,0.02250287,2.5962552e-7,0.00001872225,0.9743487,0.00208554,0.000065046705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000851825,0.00031701935,0.018710174,0.00007476994,0.00016655753,0.0000062235504,0.14097239,0.00014677731,0.00028640247,0.80339277,0.034866422,0.00020866228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052485326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005442372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17095599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023804618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032427055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79342467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399579707","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.13417","title":"The Case for a Scottish Clarity Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Referendum; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Home rule; Brexit; Politics; Constitution; Secession; Law; Government (linguistics); Notice; Public administration; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.026966520605715947,"score_gpt":0.34450633039565354,"score_spread":0.31753980978993757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399579707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29587367,0.0023720749,0.0029643048,0.48603418,0.004787875,0.00206677,0.00054552744,0.0006005018,0.20475508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919172,0.0000033525373,0.000019545543,0.0009007102,0.0015719819,0.000072143994,5.8810474e-7,0.000010713237,0.005503766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982184,0.00024736545,0.0001954438,0.00017716816,0.0002260622,0.00093552895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681383,0.0026036368,0.000018283046,0.00023508506,0.000048661615,0.0002804834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010433457,0.00009005284,0.00010867989,0.000009003387,0.0011916045,0.00058616116,0.00030738694,0.000085014915,0.000031432206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038559755,0.000047147023,0.00014682542,0.00011214479,0.0007210632,0.00012165962,0.000013130136,0.0002016916,0.00015165008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004155788,0.0000101427595,0.000010618928,0.000015952382,0.000014175511,0.0000672401,0.0016181545,1.0649156e-8,0.0000031917004,0.98025644,0.005647806,0.012352088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005568349,0.00007489697,0.00025382865,0.00002409472,0.00002047666,0.00007576939,0.0029410103,0.0001792382,0.0000047988383,0.4477101,0.5485831,0.000077014265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054520924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018703375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6960435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014059647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002134274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}