{"meta":{"query_hash":"cded255ed749","filters":{"venue":"The Political Science Reviewer"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cded255ed749","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Political+Science+Reviewer"},"results":[{"id":"W2786823714","doi":"","title":"Monserrat, Torres, and Planinc on Voegelin’s Return to the Ancients","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Relation (database); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Order (exchange); Pleasure; Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.08541269048265963,"score_gpt":0.3214292925556877,"score_spread":0.23601660207302805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786823714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037610676,0.06252707,0.007025144,0.28568277,0.0074589355,0.00003458715,0.00014956752,0.0001649417,0.5993464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7763177,0.020358643,0.003019395,0.043146394,0.008379291,0.00009727921,0.00008363279,0.00029423527,0.14830343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848014,0.000676458,0.000022109514,0.00017011657,0.0004803145,0.00017084887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988262,0.0008083103,0.0000670873,0.00007402215,0.00015131223,0.00007311861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018577504,0.00039032806,0.00028011348,0.0012573602,0.0043421015,0.0038801464,0.0008147776,0.0020728726,0.0040560598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050937976,0.00013700277,0.00020009911,0.0013735474,0.011808691,0.004077745,0.0024443946,0.004022381,0.0006155924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031561485,0.0000063505904,0.00009787867,0.00003499583,0.0000035827459,0.00015813978,0.015802002,0.00008674431,0.000102888596,0.9141927,0.057299826,0.012183388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074521795,0.000018270373,0.00057136075,0.00021712638,0.0000043252076,0.00014204545,0.0061019533,0.00012787535,0.00033055985,0.19933867,0.7931221,0.000018305045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069379816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010346402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069379816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034599165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015478183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025103569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903074089","doi":"","title":"Aristophanic Themes in Plato’s Republic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Tragedy (event); Comedy; Philosophy; Literature; Socratic method; The Republic; Comics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.09676109642402354,"score_gpt":0.3276501488095674,"score_spread":0.23088905238554386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903074089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04812467,0.0061650295,0.0031352255,0.019081622,0.00092006393,0.000022743543,0.000065316985,0.000050339415,0.922435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91471153,0.0011177025,0.0010009793,0.0026467962,0.00043213696,0.000033939446,0.000024244742,0.000052942207,0.07997974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917114,0.0003727341,0.000020469332,0.00009531228,0.00017071277,0.00016970183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997727,0.000096814256,0.0000260804,0.000028782686,0.000029972158,0.000045610126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009400608,0.00031252045,0.00018075506,0.00059605204,0.0066107786,0.004153434,0.00029796813,0.0010127433,0.0041980417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012544093,0.00014860676,0.00015456161,0.00065050554,0.011493009,0.0025601548,0.002034663,0.0030035547,0.0007334376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014059925,0.00000831691,0.0001093146,0.000014252029,9.3132496e-7,0.0000624298,0.011015175,0.00004031474,0.0000704055,0.9799535,0.0054022665,0.00330898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030545845,0.000025406998,0.0011909406,0.00010072658,0.0000034823672,0.00016961512,0.006708053,0.00033911841,0.00029271972,0.4109925,0.58013403,0.000012805521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048351428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006470034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066107786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042277696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002090813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030674756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903890057","doi":"","title":"Maurice Cowling, 1926–2005","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Politics; Skepticism; Political philosophy; Progressivism; Liberalism; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02740800157743764,"score_gpt":0.35936682504866524,"score_spread":0.3319588234712276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903890057","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024229526,0.5790779,0.0010915054,0.15557843,0.021619996,0.000027782733,0.00075109623,0.000103962186,0.23932639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034637257,0.15783013,0.001114595,0.024426866,0.0088831745,0.0000923974,0.00035206316,0.00019678462,0.77246666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991648,0.00019725603,0.00004147649,0.00024141019,0.00025933172,0.00009580232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932575,0.00021018028,0.00007895205,0.000040584135,0.00018257106,0.00016187846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010624673,0.00090526236,0.0003814668,0.0018125656,0.0040756464,0.004469738,0.00078496506,0.00293855,0.023691434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004463449,0.00050059945,0.0002396615,0.0018258247,0.0031745217,0.004165261,0.0019152289,0.004127889,0.012475727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029922956,0.000010306274,0.00015729309,0.00014396713,0.0000041611893,0.000109595785,0.0017643194,0.000048296177,0.0000931952,0.0696607,0.88317883,0.044799425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7472033e-7,0.0000018450165,0.00012244296,0.000081724684,4.9477836e-7,0.000030542153,0.00007062949,0.0000045640563,0.000026495632,0.0012104184,0.9984484,0.0000018467769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023813054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037759535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023813054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00866501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004942045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07925576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905253247","doi":"","title":"For the Love of the Bourgeois","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ridiculous; Impossibility; Lament; Politics; Conservatism; Bourgeoisie; Hegemony; Liberalism; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.028277229694094203,"score_gpt":0.31400371356822765,"score_spread":0.28572648387413346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905253247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028226094,0.033359006,0.0026726644,0.72975224,0.023256605,0.000022310458,0.0001671608,0.00022116421,0.20772628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2026911,0.01579928,0.0036674112,0.20903742,0.012397795,0.000053969976,0.0001369417,0.00043738846,0.5557787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965396,0.0011538136,0.000058010337,0.0004951386,0.0012633043,0.0004902506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387854,0.0013848982,0.00024654737,0.0004809468,0.002724888,0.0012841525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026720136,0.0006580894,0.0005529317,0.0013356272,0.014518138,0.009412363,0.0009251795,0.0034315912,0.01179366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010287043,0.00023962288,0.00031758298,0.0011556305,0.01708041,0.0045933207,0.002208202,0.009289286,0.0038654655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033750013,0.000007308816,0.00036897956,0.00003908467,0.000005413315,0.00009794169,0.0068057217,0.000031959877,0.00011650603,0.29899406,0.67945457,0.014044729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035713729,0.0000029152252,0.000160282,0.000054608354,0.0000015047825,0.000067164685,0.002278752,0.000026535266,0.000041190364,0.016541105,0.9808127,0.000009454152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.299793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43336514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.700207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014322085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014798207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59609604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917400860","doi":"","title":"Leo Strauss on Nazism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Politics; Political theology; Nazism; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Political philosophy; Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Communism; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.09377313309748674,"score_gpt":0.32734853935485286,"score_spread":0.2335754062573661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917400860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03397197,0.079771146,0.0024156945,0.1927763,0.0016668331,0.000021516038,0.00006786221,0.000046353893,0.68926233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83918095,0.016079748,0.0007953771,0.028141655,0.0022016836,0.000037463615,0.000031947413,0.000061023355,0.11347021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986118,0.00072303595,0.000026294347,0.00015678634,0.00027599515,0.000206147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926573,0.00039617284,0.000066416986,0.0000517367,0.00015280476,0.00006704543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048289,0.0002784501,0.000275335,0.0011579528,0.0038251395,0.002989365,0.0004255924,0.0023884191,0.0031533153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003042606,0.00014496477,0.00015645933,0.0005847783,0.01385401,0.003246249,0.002124764,0.0038585623,0.001069992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005883976,0.000003748753,0.00013724792,0.00001574105,0.0000010520192,0.000029188011,0.0031132468,0.000051766427,0.000048737118,0.97909766,0.013955272,0.003540462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011248374,0.000018441533,0.000625423,0.00027229817,0.0000028219367,0.00008369862,0.0018256747,0.0001965488,0.00019315867,0.45809805,0.53866094,0.000011724501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017562192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020302694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017562192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054374337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024219158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03945154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943525958","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Forum on Luke Mayville, John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oligarchy; Witness; Pleasure; Politics; Democracy; State (computer science); Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Classics; Law; Philosophy; History; Literature; Art; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.016517990854581242,"score_gpt":0.3383428389595287,"score_spread":0.3218248481049475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943525958","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00093176466,0.11679622,0.00097171665,0.38700047,0.2006727,0.00010285268,0.00095261313,0.00031078063,0.292261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00862561,0.03308588,0.00052938994,0.13085812,0.07340294,0.00014326193,0.000517173,0.00024650517,0.75259113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964786,0.00009278158,0.000015559275,0.000050795425,0.00014093271,0.0000519885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982778,0.00065557804,0.00010012504,0.000037380116,0.000570882,0.00035832162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005111144,0.00082156825,0.0004893174,0.0014606091,0.0030835015,0.0032284064,0.0010003734,0.003465048,0.09016621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033211617,0.00032142614,0.00040265484,0.0014641805,0.0012378267,0.0038940848,0.001691825,0.003916959,0.03351326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001786567,0.0000037773107,0.000016720356,0.0000126351815,2.427615e-7,0.000010308493,0.00004471302,0.0000033389374,0.000011230067,0.0013339508,0.996407,0.0021542646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017811685,0.0000027960557,0.00014901918,0.0001040269,5.93371e-7,0.000024479124,0.00018806665,0.000008163144,0.000010079955,0.0011865055,0.99832135,0.0000030785839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008938766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0313854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09016621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019403703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016866721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30163604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943831690","doi":"","title":"Hans-georg Gadamer and the Harmony of Word and Deed","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Deed; Opposition (politics); Philosophy; Harmony (color); Nazi Germany; Complicity; German; Theology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.04076360252671101,"score_gpt":0.3494797364409573,"score_spread":0.3087161339142463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943831690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033595838,0.070668146,0.0071529904,0.12967525,0.009120223,0.000023167888,0.00012607692,0.00022895627,0.74940944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7720291,0.016218796,0.0033868789,0.018860817,0.0028274113,0.000034916517,0.000099028046,0.0004279287,0.18611515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982412,0.0008062356,0.00007262323,0.00029620287,0.0003043376,0.00027948475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922943,0.00038530095,0.00007073032,0.000093918956,0.00009916177,0.00012145963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012923545,0.0004904601,0.00037779548,0.0009778868,0.0038428688,0.006765796,0.00042667374,0.0020879593,0.0062681646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030151098,0.0002884018,0.00012091616,0.0007524495,0.015693534,0.007139341,0.004260356,0.0038941677,0.0028830366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037186088,0.000007709146,0.0001979142,0.000030848612,0.0000046344794,0.00021099967,0.011353617,0.000041926833,0.00015036401,0.9267238,0.042803563,0.018437479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010690898,0.00001676978,0.0003410479,0.000124245,0.0000031944028,0.00043297006,0.0031447026,0.000066672794,0.00020265202,0.21565956,0.77997935,0.000018142851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026596792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004353279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006765796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023369163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012062541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020969152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948703625","doi":"","title":"Philosophy of the Cosmonimic Idea","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Reformed Theology and Governance","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Prime minister; Politics; Democracy; Classics; Religious studies; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Law; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036973382658066045,"score_gpt":0.2676611433104481,"score_spread":0.23068776065238206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948703625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011085486,0.033702035,0.022920579,0.08708264,0.0026429205,0.000033087475,0.00007087714,0.000060596452,0.84240174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84279555,0.014994721,0.01062951,0.021222146,0.0050912523,0.00023382623,0.000082269275,0.000137157,0.10481359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976494,0.0015239937,0.00004665171,0.00028203998,0.00032071554,0.00017717051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998784,0.0006801546,0.00008441894,0.0001679073,0.00014892257,0.00013455699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033154767,0.00035717507,0.00031127693,0.0011256664,0.0035037333,0.0048134495,0.000697796,0.0020337347,0.004348809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025811559,0.0001644355,0.00029638235,0.00080567435,0.041274425,0.005670298,0.0022656226,0.004812997,0.00094231963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015042494,0.0000017647682,0.00001619656,0.000004769929,5.419679e-7,0.0000045340134,0.00045192218,0.000017943732,0.000007692402,0.99698585,0.0019395436,0.00056774827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008383794,0.000005179085,0.000071526905,0.00003801063,9.866429e-7,0.000031537562,0.00057943707,0.00012437855,0.00002131967,0.8955475,0.10356886,0.0000029102307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034363123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025146632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053002606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053002606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026488942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0384562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951133556","doi":"","title":"Author Meets Critics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"American Political and Social Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0583223992617369,"score_gpt":0.3415281231475344,"score_spread":0.2832057238857975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951133556","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035445983,0.0063746874,0.00055044057,0.61526173,0.28122893,0.00005146158,0.000103148224,0.00019132406,0.09588379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012925374,0.00397172,0.00049528695,0.35849416,0.13168977,0.0001585578,0.00015391313,0.00042132265,0.49168983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793914,0.0031672972,0.0008123927,0.001731397,0.01382525,0.0010722703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9294642,0.012757865,0.0026310538,0.0028465327,0.048369918,0.00393028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010244381,0.00096960505,0.001298473,0.00311021,0.009774983,0.012384117,0.0017954763,0.016616996,0.057259716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100588396,0.00066334323,0.0010711873,0.0019793399,0.004050127,0.00724165,0.0033043753,0.016223628,0.029048081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044477883,0.0000027835617,0.000035377172,0.000016105496,0.0000012347058,0.000028063476,0.000047412497,0.0000056398503,0.00001608229,0.0041104755,0.9933478,0.0023844845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053906747,0.000004338106,0.00008602833,0.000093797906,0.0000031429468,0.000050819297,0.00020152742,0.00002736441,0.000040777017,0.0019804095,0.9974982,0.00000812305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047773276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011675472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057259716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005720499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080920495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19155282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999823647","doi":"","title":"To Imitate the Ancients in the Hard Things or the Soft","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Renaissance and Early Modern Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Humanism; Articulation (sociology); Politics; Context (archaeology); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Civic virtue; Virtue; Epistemology; Sociology; Literature; Law; Social science; History; Political science; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.10204284451844237,"score_gpt":0.31427482905101245,"score_spread":0.21223198453257008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999823647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1475271,0.021529425,0.020508446,0.24615382,0.00208541,0.00003461197,0.000070538765,0.00012672214,0.5619638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512083,0.0020237823,0.0042893738,0.006533457,0.00072403066,0.000014441384,0.000010717504,0.000035013552,0.035160854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921334,0.00035380546,0.000021162412,0.00012820793,0.00018991902,0.000093503666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987968,0.00060629006,0.00017882085,0.00020425022,0.00012724126,0.0000864774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013837175,0.00023243715,0.00024561197,0.0005250048,0.0022881266,0.0034652129,0.00042870815,0.0013579632,0.0017858563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026554996,0.00011176291,0.00013931104,0.0003343181,0.017197829,0.003355636,0.0017319395,0.0040737656,0.00036827527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129511445,0.000008239356,0.0005020512,0.000026635476,0.0000029665673,0.000030120269,0.011472351,0.00004685745,0.0002120998,0.97585416,0.0045305705,0.0073009087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017873237,0.000055589422,0.0029951576,0.00018051625,0.0000099735935,0.00030011532,0.009594458,0.00054133544,0.0008942174,0.44672087,0.5386669,0.000023006776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019229898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060678544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034652129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019107452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008414961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013863504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022453484","doi":"","title":"Symposium: Barry Cooper’s Consciousness and Politics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Politics; Meditation; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Theology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.02838642226425866,"score_gpt":0.28461614216322495,"score_spread":0.2562297198989663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022453484","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035574147,0.06555714,0.00024629003,0.72477275,0.19592994,0.000013975894,0.00006433241,0.000025240743,0.013034677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028002687,0.05546333,0.00061177317,0.37893808,0.40955624,0.00012223217,0.0001524005,0.00026930717,0.12688395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960574,0.0015212412,0.00014235487,0.0005016169,0.0014757578,0.00030159435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867622,0.0060876044,0.0006847285,0.00052204187,0.00410988,0.0018334057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070578842,0.0011755432,0.0012590201,0.0032715625,0.008818978,0.010153087,0.0020810103,0.008999681,0.010959691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016631948,0.0005602297,0.0009486497,0.0024515793,0.009741291,0.009125904,0.0036955364,0.015491971,0.00313939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062868057,0.0000037373838,0.000029175686,0.000040159288,0.000002652245,0.000019577787,0.00037396303,0.0000061076585,0.000017779734,0.007106202,0.9905909,0.001803469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083530185,0.000006333514,0.00027347033,0.00045112197,0.000007926019,0.00007259565,0.0014103149,0.000021814469,0.000045629447,0.00569809,0.9919926,0.000011611925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015437085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03379066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015437085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091297515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073248413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066241264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028181666","doi":"","title":"Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Liberalism; Politics; Flourishing; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04391383405460877,"score_gpt":0.3598240225034738,"score_spread":0.31591018844886504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028181666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026870002,0.0041553695,0.00069434586,0.9623813,0.012575888,0.000006336384,0.000014387167,0.000025358448,0.017459966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21288177,0.00603032,0.0026198511,0.65491015,0.018731322,0.000069825124,0.000035542787,0.0001813992,0.10453983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521244,0.0016704198,0.00014525701,0.00094631355,0.0015670577,0.00045850239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827878,0.008068862,0.000859445,0.00050305884,0.0061771404,0.0016036186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00612796,0.00044765454,0.0006535633,0.0008665374,0.009125671,0.007691373,0.0013776459,0.008079028,0.004736088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02591892,0.0003436641,0.00037195394,0.0006719473,0.010444431,0.0070340685,0.0017968622,0.016019478,0.0019924918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041334206,0.000030385005,0.00063006824,0.00009391159,0.000010343302,0.00026475257,0.006275805,0.00004101661,0.0002295906,0.24104999,0.7403982,0.010934592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001871725,0.000019513729,0.00082746113,0.00023563669,0.000009340262,0.00026416796,0.007102618,0.00017247292,0.00034902612,0.07350483,0.91745263,0.000043479544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007824987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012211664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009125671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029888803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030349295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03240812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107484652","doi":"","title":"Thomas Hobbes, Comedian","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Contempt; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Laughter; Harm; Politics; Reputation; Law; Racism; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.11231554403286571,"score_gpt":0.296006524206292,"score_spread":0.18369098017342628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107484652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020274508,0.13019018,0.0021311468,0.30568638,0.061720345,0.000030388623,0.00022130071,0.00025127275,0.49774152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048354417,0.03325876,0.0010545459,0.062684394,0.012572481,0.00006379291,0.00014976609,0.0002760595,0.8415857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.00025821864,0.00003760226,0.00020693851,0.00029582475,0.00006914914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906427,0.0003077686,0.000055135686,0.000053587086,0.00036512475,0.00015414406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006655599,0.00057029806,0.00036046235,0.001241701,0.005217915,0.0050173705,0.0005016063,0.0024559023,0.022881951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030605346,0.00023239838,0.00018055628,0.0008018841,0.00312198,0.0030398157,0.0010443397,0.003731667,0.009255548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001566259,0.0000075790344,0.00012245645,0.0000656991,0.0000025973993,0.00008522228,0.0017008329,0.00003030692,0.00011345499,0.09644779,0.8850678,0.016340625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012382833,0.0000022286358,0.00010151871,0.000052795902,6.253652e-7,0.000043214506,0.0004192776,0.00001316301,0.000053656884,0.00467437,0.99463505,0.0000029567798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011697941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029579157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022881951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003249526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019338976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07654774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108599780","doi":"","title":"Jesting with Giants","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"French Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comedy; Comics; Politics; Literature; Laughter; Philosophy; Monarchy; Art; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05835714550932806,"score_gpt":0.2612232944114382,"score_spread":0.20286614890211016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108599780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06513502,0.013051087,0.005686493,0.17077179,0.008217993,0.000052420783,0.00015791424,0.00078022137,0.7361471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7006191,0.002411345,0.0019171601,0.022871513,0.0016546138,0.000034381097,0.0000599756,0.0005167482,0.2699151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816954,0.00092113175,0.000025872116,0.0002707815,0.00026507376,0.00034758888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985678,0.0005253209,0.00016772757,0.00016369192,0.00028663693,0.000288806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023469352,0.0008342762,0.00041869888,0.0012410879,0.013512088,0.0062029907,0.0005625646,0.002436429,0.012280699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042356323,0.00020692813,0.0004424502,0.0006211802,0.013517173,0.0041742325,0.0036981902,0.003572615,0.0032549007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013367331,0.000028039869,0.0008531728,0.00017315826,0.000023737288,0.0011432528,0.10434771,0.00013113709,0.0010445717,0.56126004,0.304771,0.026090449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007014966,0.000033134696,0.0003967094,0.00011989352,0.0000060229268,0.0004949869,0.029106664,0.000064714906,0.00044303935,0.018121637,0.9511951,0.00001102087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010185913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021522827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013512088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061766445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015788977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044814944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108668142","doi":"","title":"Wit and Persuasion in Philosophic Courtiership","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Politics; Hatred; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Literature; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Art; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.12987030872756677,"score_gpt":0.38025047354935765,"score_spread":0.2503801648217909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108668142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09113214,0.008449003,0.0058691767,0.032989897,0.00068169105,0.000038534523,0.000024863675,0.000054908807,0.8607598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849642,0.0007669382,0.0003760342,0.0009114533,0.0001928418,0.000013422677,0.000004616572,0.000021853079,0.012748644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937005,0.0048949304,0.00009840547,0.00031876258,0.000609095,0.00037829453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990818,0.0075320248,0.0006838993,0.00032503466,0.0004119378,0.00022906241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050652414,0.0004211704,0.00027439685,0.002103419,0.007330821,0.008499275,0.0006771626,0.0027879332,0.007067673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010953428,0.00023772774,0.00020022107,0.0015269128,0.043690823,0.004833576,0.0031619382,0.0036091802,0.00053392205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001700446,0.000012041535,0.00021735817,0.00006310607,0.0000057956813,0.00013692773,0.037414484,0.00008149494,0.00013056069,0.9556382,0.0024991948,0.0037838232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062426705,0.000049374074,0.0014239886,0.0003772309,0.000015560485,0.00027507514,0.04215447,0.0005595229,0.00079248054,0.6438256,0.31043866,0.000025611414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025589839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037069484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008499275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052902093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017381666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038383365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110769038","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Italian Fascism and Post-war Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; History; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.040791690290036424,"score_gpt":0.32241206791735516,"score_spread":0.28162037762731873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110769038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012200408,0.31016007,0.004697705,0.28891942,0.0729175,0.000038357768,0.00026294927,0.00017096079,0.32161307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089266755,0.22189961,0.0048837243,0.07544867,0.16213597,0.0001562732,0.0003921631,0.0003696978,0.4454471],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986206,0.00076748227,0.0000503834,0.000112475536,0.0002952081,0.00015378496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719954,0.0018990329,0.00013928997,0.000108464854,0.0003518554,0.0003017459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019412375,0.00071453006,0.0006152481,0.0030043372,0.0041986,0.005145661,0.00075212156,0.0024545302,0.02109502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044218344,0.00036380594,0.00054160284,0.0038109424,0.0075657,0.005171331,0.0018737253,0.0062582428,0.0046697655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018668572,0.000013747027,0.00013133034,0.00022900004,0.0000055131068,0.00009345581,0.0025765188,0.00008772297,0.000056321005,0.24200727,0.72248757,0.032292902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016975627,0.000005169432,0.00015753071,0.0002638178,0.0000013155708,0.000062046995,0.00059581245,0.000029832776,0.000019675259,0.047842704,0.95101506,0.0000053217445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031546913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009055979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02109502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041670436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024200997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07056981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111201273","doi":"","title":"Benjamin Franklin’s Comic Critique of Religious Controversy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Hoax; Comics; Character (mathematics); Politics; Literature; Religious belief; Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.028516273881448048,"score_gpt":0.35271446681044794,"score_spread":0.3241981929289999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111201273","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075527234,0.020975482,0.0036536937,0.5852747,0.0051258253,0.0000132347695,0.00006404981,0.00004906324,0.37729126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6656619,0.010275292,0.0022403535,0.16639285,0.011559495,0.00010317663,0.000046678728,0.00015524107,0.14356492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969133,0.0016466787,0.00005544658,0.00024810078,0.00090331415,0.0002330191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969676,0.0022515599,0.00011176351,0.00010489962,0.00042162937,0.0001425971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019772395,0.00034565022,0.0002553278,0.0012973135,0.00815341,0.0049021505,0.0010641362,0.0059352964,0.0042306073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009131784,0.00024029413,0.00019452896,0.0010515312,0.018095026,0.004746916,0.0023075752,0.0068773483,0.00096653047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072137336,0.0000027308374,0.000038825525,0.000017778586,0.0000011540235,0.000046568504,0.0030895188,0.000051302894,0.000038022972,0.88997036,0.104197055,0.0025394307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000116020365,0.0000045817046,0.00012419534,0.00010044581,0.0000027567767,0.000105785795,0.0023037042,0.00017373812,0.00012575895,0.22279939,0.77423644,0.000011569508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0191529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018704072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0191529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005943669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025744948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043124557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213739780","doi":"","title":"Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Epoch (astronomy); History; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Art history; Astronomy; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.08245182573749571,"score_gpt":0.3159131761051389,"score_spread":0.2334613503676432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213739780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026878167,0.005907916,0.00013520864,0.942652,0.045210786,0.0000054431953,0.000019786927,0.000023425197,0.005776665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02185066,0.009483149,0.0003322923,0.79132295,0.1112002,0.00005540521,0.00003736679,0.0002916385,0.065426305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963381,0.0013950685,0.00023267487,0.00061543705,0.0011539852,0.00026464692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96695554,0.02157863,0.0012632987,0.0008579406,0.0074925455,0.0018521366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005772885,0.0010686539,0.0013117853,0.0031023088,0.0139050465,0.013932731,0.0025651702,0.02153995,0.006647269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037304446,0.00064803223,0.00059781206,0.0030472728,0.013289786,0.009032978,0.0038512235,0.030625017,0.002833994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074253735,0.0000041228673,0.00010164302,0.00004665492,0.000004611056,0.0000796961,0.0013270885,0.000023205544,0.000019848356,0.017332017,0.9792681,0.0017856616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010606571,0.0000060890634,0.00049005874,0.0004509979,0.000013135417,0.00016439037,0.0056676916,0.0001081109,0.00007977294,0.012365306,0.98061323,0.000030592128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024867669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06250171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024867669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004604713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058759106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049445808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}