{"meta":{"query_hash":"cded255ed749","filters":{"venue":"The Political Science Reviewer"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cded255ed749","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Political+Science+Reviewer"},"results":[{"id":"W2786823714","doi":"","title":"Monserrat, Torres, and Planinc on Voegelin’s Return to the Ancients","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Relation (database); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Order (exchange); Pleasure; Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.08541269048265963,"score_gpt":0.3214292925556877,"score_spread":0.23601660207302805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786823714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08080686,0.0009003121,0.0000060062903,0.27194014,0.002177717,0.0006480801,0.00006543731,0.000041263847,0.6434142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848799,0.000049806637,0.000008075616,0.010618797,0.0013331949,0.000014846315,3.3375684e-7,0.0000052832074,0.0030897604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985912,0.000054177777,0.0001514792,0.00024644614,0.0003899262,0.0005668024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986164,0.00014868569,0.000049442777,0.0007649788,0.000101446596,0.00031903066],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009437148,0.00011143095,0.00014559059,0.000020057523,0.0027610639,0.00067694194,0.0009692139,0.00001713408,0.00020271976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016861554,0.000045642068,0.000051589406,0.00003632688,0.0025410897,0.00017351007,0.0002899607,0.00017978094,0.0004837651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004930533,0.000017860186,0.000032291944,0.000005984586,0.0000017973806,0.0000010388774,0.0005694249,5.8239937e-8,0.000007936429,0.9906566,0.006100763,0.002601275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052399817,0.00006805946,0.0031956614,0.000096376934,0.000015644575,0.0000025492488,0.00016377214,0.000056266366,0.000037157664,0.07931843,0.9168916,0.00010212292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023763042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026145342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9113382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040624058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004274272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903074089","doi":"","title":"Aristophanic Themes in Plato’s Republic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Tragedy (event); Comedy; Philosophy; Literature; Socratic method; The Republic; Comics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.09676109642402354,"score_gpt":0.3276501488095674,"score_spread":0.23088905238554386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903074089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020613754,0.0008549465,0.0000022839167,0.049323466,0.0007222004,0.000202874,0.000006277054,0.00002969542,0.92824453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99412906,0.000062052466,0.00000831499,0.0020799118,0.0007424353,0.00001329071,2.7414586e-7,0.000005162291,0.0029594724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985419,0.000042097843,0.00021539493,0.00023347531,0.0003102,0.00065691926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872553,0.00011320439,0.000071871225,0.0007966383,0.00010210801,0.0001906348],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009211862,0.00009960831,0.00018468565,0.000040664705,0.0013160036,0.0005992018,0.0011375234,0.000019330131,0.0011104636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020763495,0.00005094368,0.0000829632,0.00005263743,0.0037909658,0.00048229843,0.00024105224,0.00019427187,0.00037531866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013645011,0.000029289851,0.000050376737,0.000009369988,0.000001100476,0.000002024409,0.00029921927,1.9380792e-8,0.000006590294,0.9953922,0.0003869611,0.0038214514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000691908,0.00001547071,0.0026035819,0.00006208407,0.0000071017544,0.000001973331,0.00012720321,0.00003509177,0.000038680082,0.5407231,0.4562256,0.000090949245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035800345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028903337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97351533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007268633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903890057","doi":"","title":"Maurice Cowling, 1926–2005","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Politics; Skepticism; Political philosophy; Progressivism; Liberalism; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02740800157743764,"score_gpt":0.35936682504866524,"score_spread":0.3319588234712276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903890057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029190138,0.0008933396,0.0002458999,0.020775454,0.00058087753,0.0003714016,0.000007222452,0.00012497851,0.9478107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98809755,0.00017104838,0.00015813064,0.0066577867,0.0011852647,0.000018240313,4.316764e-7,0.0000066196285,0.0037049286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958106,0.00038319736,0.00032883784,0.00032111473,0.0009224372,0.0022337849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979792,0.00056064565,0.00005581362,0.0004290769,0.00027468964,0.0007005315],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056294524,0.00013229797,0.00021005564,0.000048270722,0.0016384834,0.00020975532,0.0012444538,0.000059747905,0.0011744448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004889181,0.00008079414,0.000111900554,0.0008416591,0.0076149083,0.00046561065,0.00013677726,0.00021676834,0.0015593392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010544722,0.00002801968,0.00021155713,0.0000065635295,8.3322317e-7,0.0000012635113,0.00007723028,9.847884e-7,0.00009531929,0.9980942,0.00077643595,0.0007065292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004073532,0.000009918308,0.0025757994,0.00003777048,0.000014939593,0.000002774085,0.00026519576,0.000021490943,0.00037170717,0.5062842,0.49023357,0.00014191658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039590816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013964661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031514422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056299096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905253247","doi":"","title":"For the Love of the Bourgeois","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ridiculous; Impossibility; Lament; Politics; Conservatism; Bourgeoisie; Hegemony; Liberalism; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.028277229694094203,"score_gpt":0.31400371356822765,"score_spread":0.28572648387413346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905253247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005876717,0.0054404335,0.00050800724,0.77991414,0.0030044462,0.0014487136,0.00006755756,0.00001877138,0.20372124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9446973,0.0015339002,0.00002556066,0.005329052,0.0006761296,0.000022754504,3.1050828e-8,0.0000056853924,0.047709573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986714,0.000102923506,0.00013242371,0.000107895125,0.00043968763,0.00054565154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984967,0.00072925485,0.000052672985,0.00034745203,0.00020213473,0.0001717871],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026889774,0.000038529957,0.00008698357,0.000030197007,0.0012933203,0.00009700796,0.0010788458,0.000020538535,0.0006127296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061093923,0.000014003145,0.00013423235,0.00041912118,0.009298125,0.000111369496,0.000072653485,0.000047106794,0.0001582902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.59321e-7,0.0000044232775,0.00006435784,0.0000051491616,0.0000014572042,2.4963283e-8,0.00049815275,2.3407708e-8,0.00005742367,0.9766475,0.0127185015,0.010002451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026552825,0.000004701968,0.0023500114,0.000041764903,0.000018211253,3.1112305e-7,0.00039456543,0.0000013493456,0.000043163145,0.02689593,0.9701909,0.000032557346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06592307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09729883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041454143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012079669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99473053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917400860","doi":"","title":"Leo Strauss on Nazism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Politics; Political theology; Nazism; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Political philosophy; Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Communism; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.09377313309748674,"score_gpt":0.32734853935485286,"score_spread":0.2335754062573661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917400860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02002844,0.00033486707,0.000013160041,0.067538574,0.0022713954,0.00031346697,0.00003587463,0.000090302885,0.90937394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693158,0.000041151303,0.000017253791,0.022062859,0.0056063184,0.000012229119,0.0000011221961,0.000009820887,0.0029334242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974181,0.000102520775,0.00028011375,0.0003298766,0.00063825794,0.0012311446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998385,0.00023238576,0.000036027002,0.00048490902,0.00030227358,0.0005593673],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008254038,0.00017018763,0.00021228442,0.00004483645,0.0009322612,0.00022326864,0.0007383635,0.000029751203,0.0063538086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087935245,0.000082624945,0.00013045802,0.00015196444,0.0069064256,0.00017186718,0.00013112492,0.00023654793,0.0055765724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000460275,0.00006529994,0.000005133539,0.000010959182,0.0000037418815,9.636867e-7,0.0002439275,1.4450077e-8,0.000014398037,0.9956966,0.0017463826,0.002207985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056566572,0.00015039508,0.00018205875,0.0000638763,0.000016073478,0.0000028251336,0.00010063247,0.000015506004,0.00027364222,0.37729952,0.6217202,0.000118736105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009632855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015199377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94928735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008053538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007090364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943525958","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Forum on Luke Mayville, John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oligarchy; Witness; Pleasure; Politics; Democracy; State (computer science); Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Classics; Law; Philosophy; History; Literature; Art; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.016517990854581242,"score_gpt":0.3383428389595287,"score_spread":0.3218248481049475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943525958","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04489074,0.00027484237,0.0004911414,0.60906655,0.0008343438,0.0007693409,0.000017566255,0.000033249882,0.3436222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832883,0.00023307014,0.00027188123,0.013660889,0.001789159,0.000013241869,2.0418155e-7,0.0000035474754,0.0007397415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978349,0.0003063069,0.00020640565,0.00023031933,0.00065557484,0.00076648116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838316,0.000464449,0.000075550306,0.0003271538,0.00037261104,0.00037706186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025130683,0.000088349894,0.0002154763,0.000045184115,0.0010684129,0.00005550563,0.0005207293,0.000017160244,0.00012548658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048278747,0.00004347623,0.000058858568,0.00087617926,0.036244154,0.00008985213,0.00013078684,0.00011388819,0.000120485434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014053882,0.000011477249,0.000096429634,0.0000029120026,0.0000026666073,6.827729e-8,0.00029727945,3.669414e-7,0.000014267903,0.9910509,0.0027099033,0.0057996674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008016962,0.00018224922,0.0014825052,0.000034772398,0.000021432668,0.0000022607082,0.0023050644,0.0000134421,0.00012046525,0.019216461,0.9764461,0.000095095726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072731576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032471068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97373617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012031746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006747322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943831690","doi":"","title":"Hans-georg Gadamer and the Harmony of Word and Deed","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Deed; Opposition (politics); Philosophy; Harmony (color); Nazi Germany; Complicity; German; Theology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.04076360252671101,"score_gpt":0.3494797364409573,"score_spread":0.3087161339142463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943831690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5189781,0.013195407,0.00011647581,0.09687167,0.0012546818,0.0006463722,0.0000074730656,0.000028066315,0.36890176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946774,0.00016176264,0.000046827252,0.0043885135,0.00025928812,0.0000116301435,1.0595263e-7,0.0000035939267,0.0004508365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878865,0.00019208963,0.00018570057,0.00021008741,0.00013942122,0.00048402342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991124,0.00023095171,0.000048953443,0.00035712836,0.00010691927,0.0001436235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014643609,0.00008084037,0.00020175861,0.000027654196,0.00028166585,0.000019935334,0.00035283287,0.000034317865,0.0003212613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046561853,0.000036086272,0.00003499307,0.0002444603,0.014414848,0.00005923467,0.00016689808,0.00012085213,0.00015500364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035967296,0.000016500382,0.00027416094,0.00000878808,0.000011399382,3.421147e-7,0.00050267146,2.149174e-9,0.00015449792,0.99488765,0.0002430544,0.0038649684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006870213,0.000140867,0.044270713,0.000044850545,0.00009090986,0.000045394598,0.00040818733,0.000016550266,0.00020334931,0.9313897,0.02256903,0.00013344944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014050156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053390318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47569934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009583509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025210516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98826736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948703625","doi":"","title":"Philosophy of the Cosmonimic Idea","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Reformed Theology and Governance","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Prime minister; Politics; Democracy; Classics; Religious studies; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Law; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036973382658066045,"score_gpt":0.2676611433104481,"score_spread":0.23068776065238206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948703625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066502735,0.0020190715,0.000013695736,0.01615955,0.0012340714,0.00027899598,0.000011286356,0.000013978039,0.9137666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932151,0.000087900924,0.00000723241,0.00381475,0.00012339716,0.0000060403718,4.9872476e-8,0.0000028421325,0.0027426814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895227,0.0000955393,0.00017507003,0.00011106374,0.00025345534,0.0004126087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928355,0.00009162541,0.00007137025,0.00036135752,0.00012397632,0.00006810676],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008020694,0.000068279296,0.00012557073,0.000011583355,0.00043602264,0.000022807335,0.0005585347,0.000014172705,0.00063835416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096569036,0.000025611404,0.00008689016,0.00009831957,0.0052193087,0.000107532345,0.000058180554,0.00011607879,0.00012559998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.632585e-7,0.0000123308855,0.00017421471,0.000012531835,0.0000018937268,8.781136e-8,0.00036807836,1.2928395e-7,0.000014764224,0.9989912,0.00026234824,0.00016177275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000434773,0.00001539203,0.0016739768,0.00006920377,0.000014890381,0.0000046949526,0.00011022674,0.0000074272593,0.0006306314,0.7327285,0.26464385,0.000057751546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000082446866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035300724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034652425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010649297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951133556","doi":"","title":"Author Meets Critics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"American Political and Social Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0583223992617369,"score_gpt":0.3415281231475344,"score_spread":0.2832057238857975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951133556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018044004,0.0002883702,0.00019997027,0.10699205,0.0022301758,0.00027276514,0.000039507242,0.00012353275,0.8718096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971841,0.000013605223,0.00012182834,0.013992039,0.0028768457,0.000008927696,5.6604944e-7,0.000008873518,0.011136364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796337,0.000070850285,0.00022457907,0.00020513362,0.00043644715,0.0010996327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985122,0.00015951165,0.000029788436,0.000303018,0.00055104244,0.00044443522],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007177755,0.000112360154,0.00018417125,0.00002975991,0.0011797724,0.00021322153,0.00056828064,0.000020457745,0.0022634175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017221945,0.000060049024,0.00008807436,0.00014299809,0.017051488,0.00016858816,0.00014426034,0.00013072931,0.0014569649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.4543215e-7,0.000018005334,0.000009015694,0.000007804615,0.0000019973736,4.7409983e-7,0.0010842378,5.429356e-9,0.000007115528,0.99472547,0.002143786,0.0020013528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026458907,0.000071085786,0.00023403967,0.000029590266,0.000026744101,0.0000024563358,0.0015747624,0.0002039322,0.000027401094,0.23289642,0.7647727,0.00013441223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058036525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012824572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9537969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009309373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016850587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999823647","doi":"","title":"To Imitate the Ancients in the Hard Things or the Soft","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Renaissance and Early Modern Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Humanism; Articulation (sociology); Politics; Context (archaeology); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Civic virtue; Virtue; Epistemology; Sociology; Literature; Law; Social science; History; Political science; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.10204284451844237,"score_gpt":0.31427482905101245,"score_spread":0.21223198453257008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999823647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38780412,0.004767592,0.000044663342,0.40909928,0.0020891184,0.0027565337,0.000014764604,0.000055447246,0.19336846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94874525,0.00023305399,0.000007844045,0.044110827,0.00034287872,0.00006414117,1.535315e-7,0.000006049201,0.006489791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791527,0.00014864112,0.00022234823,0.00023035945,0.0006261163,0.00085724524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985701,0.0005294298,0.000042230513,0.0006294918,0.00015207,0.00007666656],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031485823,0.00012835456,0.0001801994,0.000024616309,0.0011772043,0.0004863542,0.0015503053,0.000011524735,0.0003816881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008276855,0.000029677312,0.000084406514,0.00023786256,0.0018972806,0.000307077,0.00024418702,0.00022500793,0.0017108595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007909323,0.000023980741,0.00055873196,0.000021336708,0.0000059807876,9.2299683e-7,0.036013987,0.0000024235703,0.000015440648,0.9410733,0.018070724,0.004205267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065922744,0.000062306506,0.013725339,0.00013138425,0.000020911091,0.0000039853685,0.011213533,0.00007763146,0.000011761968,0.012123936,0.9624447,0.00011858864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061770924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030005557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94437397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040425253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075533506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022453484","doi":"","title":"Symposium: Barry Cooper’s Consciousness and Politics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Politics; Meditation; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Theology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.02838642226425866,"score_gpt":0.28461614216322495,"score_spread":0.2562297198989663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022453484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19684795,0.0055327783,0.000002853194,0.07171133,0.0014446032,0.0005534294,0.000015437801,0.00005599846,0.7238356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847114,0.0019444255,0.000011074185,0.007379799,0.00051637704,0.00000971674,3.7889558e-7,0.000008080365,0.005418758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828166,0.00006350883,0.00022697091,0.00025946042,0.00034826345,0.0008201585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987089,0.00033330492,0.000052049283,0.00032388483,0.0003279583,0.00025388837],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008692498,0.0001318351,0.00024504113,0.000032801745,0.00093975087,0.00041904935,0.00036881247,0.000019530857,0.0007355165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046130503,0.00006763086,0.000051711086,0.00007802118,0.003247534,0.00029744665,0.00023310009,0.00015046351,0.0007925429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011410448,0.000013886778,0.00021268973,0.000047349735,0.0000058866176,6.812425e-7,0.0011733269,1.3897628e-7,0.00003474099,0.99530464,0.002949526,0.00025599616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009966728,0.000080271595,0.00019494539,0.00007502443,0.00004324969,0.00001375129,0.0031157625,0.00007126888,0.000027299033,0.020798044,0.97530663,0.00017408511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010731078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010094676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047432848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009901797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028181666","doi":"","title":"Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Liberalism; Politics; Flourishing; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04391383405460877,"score_gpt":0.3598240225034738,"score_spread":0.31591018844886504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028181666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09596154,0.00028359843,0.000024844534,0.5376935,0.0010679114,0.0012235866,0.0000766869,0.00014243164,0.3635259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80513835,0.000055769713,0.0001355345,0.1910459,0.00053686625,0.000028143137,0.000001268988,0.000015125871,0.0030430313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430776,0.00054657814,0.00044294924,0.0006228682,0.0016343126,0.002445527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959757,0.0008311098,0.0000916005,0.00077111094,0.0010192267,0.0013112851],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028088659,0.00025027804,0.00043295813,0.00009355627,0.00093201525,0.00025673126,0.0016588089,0.00010529374,0.0038524717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005797823,0.00015813694,0.0002360252,0.0012237027,0.0061965073,0.00067915936,0.0003552113,0.00041038796,0.006000667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006643504,0.000038442806,0.0005997772,0.000025331145,0.0000069566727,0.0000021659612,0.0015408236,1.18928185e-7,0.00018677411,0.99098366,0.006057046,0.00055222964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028565383,0.00017157136,0.0050295317,0.00021907847,0.000055729106,0.000008407039,0.0018621815,0.000074622905,0.0012015345,0.35007304,0.64045316,0.00056551397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041554207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012933933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70917684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046455796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001025577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99705815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107484652","doi":"","title":"Thomas Hobbes, Comedian","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Contempt; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Laughter; Harm; Politics; Reputation; Law; Racism; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.11231554403286571,"score_gpt":0.296006524206292,"score_spread":0.18369098017342628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107484652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034253816,0.001804291,0.000033006527,0.47582668,0.001221137,0.0004065743,0.000062374595,0.00014021518,0.51708037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933668,0.000113882146,0.000035875113,0.061444186,0.003931788,0.000013990488,0.0000027920057,0.000011134131,0.0007783509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754936,0.000107478176,0.00030702783,0.00031466392,0.00060391816,0.0011175863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805164,0.00023172119,0.00003676699,0.0003062643,0.00018524026,0.0011883914],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005140816,0.00016399652,0.0002625894,0.000023681529,0.00059055357,0.00022934981,0.0008454426,0.000025591038,0.0035977091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015369188,0.00008309406,0.00015303631,0.00020515277,0.0039312933,0.00021299659,0.00021039956,0.00027863117,0.0021824397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027672966,0.00003054051,0.000021372995,0.000030406683,0.000003901601,0.000002375632,0.00065925956,4.030401e-8,0.000014618787,0.99460304,0.0036151668,0.0010165107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006935369,0.000056744237,0.00009725811,0.00003204902,0.000024031444,0.0000025133106,0.00024625688,0.00005761254,0.0000710695,0.16468301,0.83452773,0.0001323771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075211115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069680727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005090335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089087356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108599780","doi":"","title":"Jesting with Giants","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"French Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comedy; Comics; Politics; Literature; Laughter; Philosophy; Monarchy; Art; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05835714550932806,"score_gpt":0.2612232944114382,"score_spread":0.20286614890211016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108599780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013095311,0.0030285027,0.00010150362,0.10925625,0.00042618532,0.00031476957,0.000013219511,0.00011272544,0.8736515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733378,0.000012196423,0.00010450832,0.024848364,0.0009476388,0.0000064985643,4.513303e-7,0.000004969267,0.00073754805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885064,0.000026631442,0.0001246755,0.00016678452,0.0002938029,0.000537485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928665,0.00006458569,0.000018991183,0.00015138827,0.00018845208,0.00028994653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027096272,0.00007984965,0.00011680199,0.000011781243,0.00040473414,0.00028974828,0.00033990107,0.000007825346,0.0009239303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060374185,0.000034976485,0.00003102484,0.0001205498,0.0016092464,0.0002357362,0.000050235318,0.00012586561,0.00031884486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.4039624e-7,0.000005645946,0.000014110832,0.000022401868,0.0000012460355,0.0000025140982,0.002131703,6.244768e-8,0.00003124922,0.99490565,0.001400723,0.0014838468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000765672,0.00012700743,0.00016221784,0.0001719413,0.00003334487,0.000009001387,0.0014689888,0.00013958961,0.00017989222,0.013331134,0.9841369,0.00016345485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044987264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011449089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9827361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015582547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006799742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108668142","doi":"","title":"Wit and Persuasion in Philosophic Courtiership","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Politics; Hatred; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Literature; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Art; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.12987030872756677,"score_gpt":0.38025047354935765,"score_spread":0.2503801648217909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108668142","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06648972,0.0020250157,0.000013267889,0.89148796,0.00010415795,0.00028674403,0.0000012483895,0.000033208657,0.03955871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893217,0.0009226307,0.000034157656,0.00927159,0.00031842262,0.0000060748334,4.9305235e-8,0.0000026334792,0.00012275921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981792,0.0001803858,0.00015247015,0.00024255682,0.00054199935,0.00070340844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990455,0.00025391128,0.000024345884,0.000102896156,0.00009536241,0.00047798915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017330643,0.00007309672,0.00017270393,0.000022805414,0.0005567375,0.00007417042,0.00039509308,0.000028128185,0.000078152734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076245316,0.000042865773,0.000035573466,0.00078940234,0.0044552353,0.00021117907,0.00020458917,0.00017089822,0.0000758955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024225842,0.000011650289,0.0013033899,0.000015481277,8.558813e-7,0.0000012972282,0.0025739525,5.6380493e-8,0.00004713266,0.9923976,0.00028148844,0.0033646473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000430123,0.00021738534,0.042286113,0.00038053154,0.00006496448,0.0000032088944,0.023480281,0.000498926,0.00010838038,0.34308168,0.58885443,0.0005939669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001943649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002179614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92283195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000994349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001521551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110769038","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Italian Fascism and Post-war Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; History; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.040791690290036424,"score_gpt":0.32241206791735516,"score_spread":0.28162037762731873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110769038","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018724453,0.0012146796,0.000115387455,0.8778083,0.0014907424,0.00072465057,0.000007379021,0.0000334473,0.099881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957661,0.0000745459,0.00019059592,0.03843732,0.0026044014,0.0000163066,5.05451e-7,0.000005044934,0.0010103043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971689,0.0004769689,0.00026968654,0.00026527527,0.00086044305,0.00095874356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987311,0.0002460787,0.000039914834,0.00031952237,0.00018608384,0.00047734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004087092,0.00008668902,0.00018795571,0.000026551039,0.00023654201,0.00003849999,0.0010522362,0.000042362455,0.00030203143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006080533,0.00004690179,0.00009843712,0.0011084729,0.0029476946,0.00018908856,0.000099263736,0.00020559962,0.00023904524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022493207,0.00001924275,0.0001355646,0.000014856959,8.97546e-7,4.7710415e-7,0.011363038,2.3114215e-7,0.000075630596,0.9487195,0.039072745,0.00059555046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046175875,0.00005034534,0.0026549834,0.000023015176,0.000016547923,0.0000013611316,0.010241292,0.000011978186,0.00006293132,0.005915304,0.9808769,0.00009916218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015210673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008337767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9428042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055329193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074280833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111201273","doi":"","title":"Benjamin Franklin’s Comic Critique of Religious Controversy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Hoax; Comics; Character (mathematics); Politics; Literature; Religious belief; Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.028516273881448048,"score_gpt":0.35271446681044794,"score_spread":0.3241981929289999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111201273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021131398,0.0038438418,0.0017496889,0.3714641,0.00065073225,0.00080200203,0.000097301985,0.000099564524,0.6001614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96815,0.00069195405,0.00019768564,0.030397378,0.00042851563,0.0000059255763,5.4394263e-7,0.0000036993126,0.00012428226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978456,0.00022502393,0.00029410652,0.0001995908,0.0006543962,0.00078130607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980125,0.0006385983,0.000075134005,0.00019811989,0.00041684322,0.0006588345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012263206,0.000091040165,0.0002617793,0.000020315283,0.0004776301,0.000042413907,0.000736891,0.000040446117,0.00020971432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007326246,0.00006045153,0.00011151185,0.0005131534,0.009384511,0.00013660232,0.000090115405,0.0001603475,0.000113503156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025852696,0.0000116418,0.00020221337,0.00001432986,0.00000281581,0.0000010669004,0.0004257658,7.76323e-7,0.00010971617,0.99651843,0.0024317817,0.00027888498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015866682,0.000079359925,0.00050553697,0.00007459989,0.00005504529,0.0000021626358,0.002184282,0.00005458457,0.00031405428,0.043226067,0.9531476,0.00019807881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045971796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005668015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95329237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012472147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023011863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213739780","doi":"","title":"Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Epoch (astronomy); History; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Art history; Astronomy; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.08245182573749571,"score_gpt":0.3159131761051389,"score_spread":0.2334613503676432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213739780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5775752,0.005925114,0.0000027526107,0.3091684,0.0006747491,0.0005195956,0.00015362311,0.000026478594,0.105954096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99154574,0.00006391256,0.000016628328,0.0042408463,0.00025357975,0.000014458967,0.0000015890703,0.0000037649743,0.0038594853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829155,0.00032533664,0.00027381073,0.00018409148,0.0004958128,0.00042939666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983063,0.00042304784,0.00006465409,0.00048252897,0.00062597654,0.00009753226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012450424,0.00011636802,0.00024339747,0.000012217223,0.0008851054,0.00012150857,0.00062195904,0.000020155187,0.00068593514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016233489,0.000040208106,0.00012488029,0.00012281857,0.003305396,0.00018927766,0.00018399791,0.00017427852,0.000031350814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004091468,0.00006546124,0.0000080862,0.000041541545,0.000010466009,8.896936e-7,0.0035691652,2.7624114e-7,0.00016241249,0.9945094,0.00061617896,0.0010120407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011087046,0.00026263582,0.0039497684,0.00051915145,0.00017386524,0.000012308569,0.008864168,0.0003144967,0.0065978626,0.47683915,0.5020994,0.00025631808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022623659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001632203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5176702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021162967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096588206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}