{"meta":{"query_hash":"9bb96700732d","filters":{"venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":32,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":32,"exported":32,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9bb96700732d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Southern+Journal+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1493767296","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00121.x","title":"DERRIDA ON THE DEATH PENALTY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Deconstruction (building); Sovereignty; Abolitionism; Philosophy; Renunciation; Capital punishment; Politics; Reading (process); Punishment (psychology); Conscience; Law; Epistemology; Capital (architecture); Literature; Theology; Political science; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Art","score_opus":0.11956394809336791,"score_gpt":0.27402274967074963,"score_spread":0.15445880157738173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493767296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33354244,0.0020926967,0.000024025934,0.087031975,0.0040936973,0.00024154561,0.00009860536,0.000043198223,0.5728318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779444,0.000019476965,0.000008585113,0.004645995,0.01627387,0.0000026040798,0.000001104844,0.00003334787,0.0010706572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984025,0.00027176796,0.00040218854,0.0000839524,0.0005233693,0.00031626044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986197,0.0002823798,0.00041841774,0.0003567019,0.00019560184,0.00012722283],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001424955,0.00019374788,0.0002319658,0.00007133609,0.00074664195,0.00014316528,0.00066649535,0.0000507854,0.0012969961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009059946,0.000087093365,0.00035328447,0.000027985197,0.00043548018,0.00020329255,0.000052560874,0.0007309761,0.0008627833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008932657,0.00010227045,0.00008487424,0.000009109581,0.00014929267,0.000004361321,0.08377319,0.0000053695035,0.0000261851,0.9140711,0.001562813,0.00012213328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039359665,0.00020277483,0.00006950356,0.000100097226,0.00015370238,0.00006127529,0.0071321786,0.000005050101,0.00008788468,0.89245903,0.09913924,0.00019566696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042805812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008727047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6444019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029237122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003622042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533970978","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00095.x","title":"WHEN THINKING HESITATES: PHILOSOPHY AS PROSTHESIS AND TRANSFORMATIVE VISION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Perception; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Temporality; Sociology","score_opus":0.030454718429926916,"score_gpt":0.28951092938332423,"score_spread":0.2590562109533973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533970978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7681936,0.012002121,0.00036728728,0.04431929,0.0014797669,0.00058359077,0.000047222096,0.0000788849,0.17292824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953691,0.000042137475,0.00025769172,0.0019002281,0.002213357,0.000009406704,0.0000023605207,0.00005122869,0.00015450543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976475,0.00053577643,0.0006928326,0.0001930243,0.00041970404,0.00051116606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983892,0.0002445931,0.0006170127,0.0003671306,0.00013276495,0.00024931208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015639937,0.0003240914,0.0004827962,0.00022181383,0.0004501479,0.000050849903,0.0006193891,0.00019310648,0.000551227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042029144,0.00020410589,0.00028179598,0.00016459664,0.0005021337,0.00058309396,0.000075493546,0.0007524439,0.00085365906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029318547,0.000914511,0.0029115875,0.00009709383,0.001723789,0.000068280904,0.44419545,0.00000843384,0.00068320683,0.5385332,0.0006987487,0.00723381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012975516,0.0008451634,0.00093471684,0.00013700857,0.00025549717,0.0005640678,0.0046801884,0.0000016611306,0.000099807825,0.9891806,0.0017434695,0.0002602531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012601218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.98728e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45064738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003869861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002647652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1727638832","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00074.x","title":"IN DEFENSE OF THE WHAT‐IT‐IS‐LIKENESS OF EXPERIENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Phrase; Unconscious mind; Interpretation (philosophy); Hacker; Mental state; Consciousness; Subject (documents); Popularity; State (computer science); Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Computer science; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.0657146296348593,"score_gpt":0.302250454041192,"score_spread":0.2365358244063327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1727638832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048996,0.0006261038,0.000063838845,0.0049906843,0.0009034137,0.000121515644,0.000012222823,0.0000028768238,0.08837977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986214,0.00001770412,0.000040383416,0.0010918382,0.00016594169,0.0000025511724,3.0620054e-8,0.0000107465385,0.00004939991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982517,0.00036185436,0.0006367663,0.00013653116,0.00039555947,0.00021761784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984348,0.00016369192,0.00065684994,0.0005395395,0.00013224334,0.000072911505],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009775102,0.00012951321,0.0002892844,0.00007918017,0.000057675148,0.000008764764,0.0013969616,0.00007769528,0.0010296421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008307999,0.000064884465,0.00024117995,0.0004208895,0.0012745772,0.00020825047,0.0001065224,0.00032766792,0.000042117066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066468015,0.00039680488,0.0022164343,0.000014234466,0.0000639714,0.000024813633,0.22290774,0.0000063654775,0.0016865064,0.77137864,0.00003559009,0.0006042174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005221988,0.0001972388,0.0014757826,0.00018601984,0.000029484638,0.00007259671,0.009153286,0.0000028176519,0.0052988078,0.98290247,0.00007035898,0.00008895165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038901853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021953654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21375445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013039889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038259543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914511293","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00091.x","title":"COHERENCE: THE PRICE IS RIGHT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Argument (complex analysis); Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04977269533428182,"score_gpt":0.22939181229589595,"score_spread":0.17961911696161412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914511293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17419042,0.006645778,0.000022562483,0.051735543,0.0033603932,0.00022363802,0.00006236783,0.000033871336,0.7637254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98703843,0.000009316743,0.000017129334,0.0027701089,0.006697832,0.000001840423,1.920572e-7,0.000012294923,0.0034528375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987637,0.00010803594,0.00031495377,0.000074449425,0.0004781573,0.0002607302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989207,0.00010686411,0.00042455088,0.00027177972,0.00016567067,0.000110480265],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010482001,0.00013500876,0.0001657072,0.00005800378,0.000997846,0.000101450794,0.00092417747,0.000027070444,0.0037413395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024329174,0.000059012113,0.00020042912,0.000058205485,0.0011202468,0.00041573317,0.000046187746,0.0003840768,0.0007816554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007030847,0.00015771807,0.000114613664,0.000013673179,0.000112001886,0.000004993355,0.42210764,0.0000033659007,0.00028221728,0.56020445,0.016314957,0.00061404554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025157572,0.00014783838,0.000085111096,0.000047121277,0.00008120068,0.0000709127,0.006496992,0.0000025987508,0.0001072072,0.46516132,0.5273856,0.00016250259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012806424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033949755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81284803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002942398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004220328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942090137","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12080","title":"Some Features of Promises and their Obligations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Moral obligation; Normative; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02722561487486898,"score_gpt":0.22988759999919123,"score_spread":0.20266198512432224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942090137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897589,0.0007049734,0.00004768041,0.006426792,0.00015769308,0.00007653649,0.00002327901,0.0000088954375,0.0027952204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881655,0.000046890236,0.000038630675,0.00035154828,0.0006204878,6.93944e-7,7.941049e-8,0.000009150856,0.000115951974],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933475,0.00013205111,0.00021231151,0.00007508799,0.0001553649,0.000090433154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992817,0.00019228504,0.0002821175,0.00014864134,0.00004531758,0.000049917904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026196885,0.00008332134,0.00014816517,0.00005761602,0.00011131199,0.000019782547,0.00030486056,0.000023806231,0.000013327729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025747833,0.000039975403,0.00008916349,0.000092513124,0.00023377512,0.00011043645,0.000036264206,0.00015859136,0.000008067875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001045529,0.00013453557,0.00042781787,0.000047799607,0.00003433908,0.0000042571182,0.0093927365,0.00006281792,0.8140651,0.16829158,0.00025388258,0.007180608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040668517,0.00023199178,0.0009431751,0.00007651683,0.000021195016,0.0001004296,0.00024849892,0.000033606157,0.11867718,0.87872714,0.00045256183,0.00008101288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023830555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.0625784e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71043557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000032128821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016497812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16301496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975675069","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00131.x","title":"On Cheering Charles Bronson: The Ethics of Vigilantism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Parade; Relevance (law); Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09622889416789544,"score_gpt":0.2767592872719903,"score_spread":0.18053039310409486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975675069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56297463,0.0048101717,0.0005943173,0.3170459,0.002097984,0.00039863048,0.000115614115,0.000064543,0.111898236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604213,0.00010430579,0.000020908888,0.0013740337,0.0020605645,4.4222435e-7,8.158033e-7,0.0000117899135,0.000384985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989275,0.00016489576,0.00034984248,0.000066601446,0.00037877265,0.00011239497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872655,0.00031283734,0.00047686094,0.0002314696,0.0002213405,0.000030968935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011940459,0.000105243955,0.00017027078,0.00005614674,0.00038861102,0.00006492668,0.00040970123,0.00006177279,0.00014216008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012872214,0.000052516803,0.00015874357,0.000027383914,0.00034311376,0.00008152817,0.000012249935,0.0008515961,0.000050775132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007014439,0.000050327497,0.0000026340454,0.000019193541,0.000035886085,0.0000023862658,0.16104123,0.00006587176,0.0006704269,0.8367801,0.00021960399,0.0010422425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033027344,0.0003275366,0.000097886856,0.00030888355,0.000096543874,0.000024687308,0.012797883,0.000028979415,0.00095334055,0.97032046,0.014589594,0.00012390222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000135150685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012245057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43306753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012189119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033026277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36998087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987355271","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00007.x","title":"Epistemic Side Constraints and the Structure of Epistemic Normativity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rationality; Constraint (computer-aided design); Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.023699987076120508,"score_gpt":0.22233272757256536,"score_spread":0.19863274049644486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987355271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95257944,0.0020500636,0.00008228826,0.017361397,0.0005673394,0.00021392097,0.0002380158,0.0000119525885,0.026895585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781775,0.000024308609,0.00003338343,0.00031051936,0.0014847646,4.5938475e-7,0.0000018450293,0.000015859221,0.0003111154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983809,0.0004701039,0.0006302894,0.00008717242,0.00027418157,0.0001573822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978836,0.00058976654,0.0009881809,0.00023506611,0.0002666512,0.000036726986],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010019753,0.00016653689,0.00044880543,0.00005544689,0.0002954931,0.00005288714,0.0003464462,0.00006376965,0.00009862517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006823564,0.00008025844,0.00023600664,0.000031408814,0.0043677823,0.00010851442,0.00004122638,0.0005568588,0.0000089509585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001769904,0.00003449526,0.00025031145,0.000109038825,0.00017216716,0.000005270544,0.04844451,0.00003028063,0.0015997511,0.94850075,0.00008601093,0.00059039844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012160536,0.00006696071,0.00009857648,0.00011291587,0.00015973333,0.00014062872,0.005596909,0.0000104596265,0.00035170253,0.9916145,0.00053106423,0.00010049713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015633708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015333961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04523831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000146240245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000550952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009749450","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00158.x","title":"Theory to Practice and Practice to Theory? Lessons from Local NGO Empowerment Projects in Indonesia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Empowerment; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.09597409301164248,"score_gpt":0.4234417654821513,"score_spread":0.3274676724705088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009749450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7329805,0.0011216492,0.0054597724,0.24833721,0.00065071177,0.0018051086,0.00003586893,0.000029422214,0.009579782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551692,0.00017624485,0.0039383266,0.03989915,0.00054538884,0.00005362925,0.0000017544406,0.00003891412,0.00017737798],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99130315,0.0064654374,0.0009466895,0.00020589282,0.0005762685,0.000502586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98863757,0.009223026,0.00070041267,0.000487958,0.00045632932,0.00049473124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008607182,0.00022652224,0.00042696932,0.0002845354,0.00091152487,0.000015127316,0.000523204,0.00013529173,0.00009622022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004291669,0.0001500217,0.000063009575,0.00043140817,0.00012825463,0.00024583927,0.00036429055,0.0017134412,0.0003673951],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021123368,0.00086838484,0.0044169654,0.000106360225,0.00025063014,0.00043203458,0.91557276,0.00009028012,0.00016807836,0.0321227,0.0026313998,0.022217011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065411367,0.0017565264,0.041218024,0.0020599894,0.00023958205,0.00089650764,0.5910415,0.000010361204,0.000039002014,0.22176531,0.1336601,0.00077195326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005401735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012033018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3245313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029652886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011858562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74441445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010343456","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00057.x","title":"The <i>Meno's</i> Metaphilosophical Examples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Contrast (vision); Epistemology; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sketch; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04833043365752451,"score_gpt":0.2417534965416718,"score_spread":0.1934230628841473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010343456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17653958,0.010962736,0.00051272137,0.22855566,0.0060375463,0.0006944583,0.00014512138,0.00016178662,0.5763904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837127,0.000051907744,0.000037770227,0.0013690186,0.014049997,0.0000019474203,0.0000011342479,0.00004067059,0.00073489716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767417,0.0001933148,0.0008539423,0.00015108919,0.0007078054,0.00041970826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730957,0.0011537939,0.00060010067,0.00043843267,0.00031717643,0.00018094883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026364257,0.00025392647,0.00033947482,0.00009419876,0.0013016633,0.00024240867,0.0010287752,0.00006543166,0.00024210305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015482472,0.00011283898,0.0005147096,0.00010556636,0.0014401258,0.00018036265,0.000095964424,0.0007925696,0.00022197503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032192026,0.000095695075,0.000016357153,0.000006889113,0.00022748929,0.000035672005,0.00905627,0.0000034775255,0.000110249835,0.98624766,0.0012000324,0.0026783103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037161028,0.00017550694,0.000021253501,0.000028633565,0.00010545741,0.000051470197,0.0023859907,0.0000023677608,0.00008111919,0.7246864,0.27196127,0.00012894956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017515962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012818242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8071731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038667586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042424035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011703803","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00132.x","title":"Free Love: A Hegelian Defense of Same‐Sex Marriage Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Duty; Institution; Mount; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02495260672409235,"score_gpt":0.27786896941250144,"score_spread":0.2529163626884091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011703803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165651,0.0031449115,0.00007734616,0.06040405,0.00018791435,0.00030700484,0.000032861986,0.0000378886,0.019242913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972606,0.000057500256,0.00072630524,0.00070151855,0.0009395964,4.345027e-7,5.4664815e-7,0.000013669001,0.0002998574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985723,0.00008162387,0.0005647585,0.00014450442,0.00041249784,0.00022431673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824136,0.000065862936,0.00055524276,0.000756661,0.00025292783,0.00012795621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065604725,0.00015512796,0.00046911588,0.00020024915,0.000062035,0.000007291747,0.000407122,0.000098865545,0.000085950385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036480153,0.00008253784,0.00024683744,0.00023417924,0.00023279947,0.00005551694,0.00003504474,0.000511795,0.000057984256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03861242,0.009458979,0.044728357,0.002328818,0.005145311,0.0051525724,0.10206567,0.00020363934,0.16502017,0.42174473,0.044706475,0.16083287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021678268,0.0020108065,0.0023977424,0.00026791322,0.00016025262,0.00065967924,0.000853225,0.00000350204,0.0075511923,0.98136663,0.0024476263,0.00011357741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015936499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011329498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55962193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003547815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008738851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33657953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042947784","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01982.x","title":"Comments on Sarah Broadie “Virtue and beyond in Plato and Aristotle”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Citation; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.027849842312379778,"score_gpt":0.22645211781133123,"score_spread":0.19860227549895146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042947784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81370115,0.0018053299,0.0000025593338,0.04557522,0.00024366858,0.00013035673,0.000058172904,0.000012041228,0.1384715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947611,0.000036706366,0.000019809098,0.0028409506,0.0019928392,0.0000011054734,7.970345e-7,0.000018076953,0.00032858923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991077,0.0000864454,0.00034332508,0.00011181295,0.00020674229,0.00014395292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937445,0.00016108293,0.000198684,0.00013359272,0.00003758222,0.000094636656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000323114,0.00015256998,0.00024699717,0.00011147855,0.00021616962,0.00008327795,0.00017285012,0.000041455085,0.00012208789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002290463,0.000093133065,0.00007543573,0.000029622071,0.0003645532,0.00014374324,0.000047939302,0.00043596106,0.00005268918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044958654,0.000294406,0.0003116886,0.000018833169,0.00010265359,0.000031046282,0.035938546,0.000023053155,0.00004754342,0.95330137,0.00061414397,0.008867137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017584052,0.00044376377,0.00023872728,0.00013392705,0.000051939372,0.000044180273,0.0018326053,0.00005730246,0.000037344744,0.93092185,0.064283095,0.00019688309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011305053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051878986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18105997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025591184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010278636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37978563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052308120","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00048.x","title":"The Temporality of Life: Merleau‐Ponty, Bergson, and the Immemorial Past","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01786531883805733,"score_gpt":0.21434492383173734,"score_spread":0.19647960499368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052308120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6695794,0.005976691,0.00019138408,0.23264301,0.0016084083,0.00040791655,0.00009947124,0.000026684693,0.08946705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991581,0.000062501866,0.00000678848,0.00064031576,0.007472906,0.0000012182578,6.561259e-7,0.00001592703,0.00021865864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978325,0.0003735916,0.00088664336,0.000111519286,0.00055238116,0.00024337339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728066,0.0012024307,0.00072846905,0.00032152314,0.00032734638,0.00013958137],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004227306,0.00018206141,0.00044674228,0.000051988005,0.00076518924,0.000119392535,0.0006887124,0.00004914207,0.00023276046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002746773,0.000063785374,0.00045832948,0.00008772813,0.0038059307,0.00008316989,0.000118588614,0.00047359732,0.00002336891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016974666,0.00006147208,0.00009795511,0.000010520928,0.0004218347,0.000004062592,0.011343646,0.0000022789982,0.000022406144,0.9852691,0.00014127114,0.0009279624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00129835,0.00013005536,0.000060541828,0.000028368799,0.00027993586,0.000011331271,0.003464333,0.000016207645,0.00003203056,0.9850553,0.009526803,0.00009670139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010385413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069235066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32200164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010927546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002950715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075924159","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00086.x","title":"Malebranche and Descartes on Method: Psychologism, Free Will, and Doubt","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Psychologism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Relation (database); Subject (documents); Cartesianism; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.07650655209298385,"score_gpt":0.25161154222283755,"score_spread":0.1751049901298537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075924159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8445534,0.0038199464,0.00034936052,0.036030263,0.0009530254,0.00018838437,0.000057788096,0.000040819003,0.11400698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958238,0.00009100437,0.000395269,0.0015424831,0.0016106056,0.0000011348077,1.4067432e-7,0.000012540621,0.0005230498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899185,0.00014590124,0.00027563443,0.0001453647,0.0002880402,0.00015319508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914324,0.00021567981,0.00021014169,0.00023082536,0.000085886335,0.00011421627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055921153,0.0001418616,0.00023113155,0.00008683041,0.00090540154,0.000041870368,0.00037531203,0.000039349678,0.00015781655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074508374,0.00007756709,0.00009684679,0.00004582282,0.0009625163,0.00019623929,0.00005738902,0.00033339043,0.000018625864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003553187,0.00016440026,0.0003097694,0.000020889194,0.000100645484,0.00008039152,0.19300947,0.000017901271,0.00035061807,0.79896504,0.0030673053,0.003558239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091205793,0.0007687479,0.00021440285,0.000054270466,0.00004908427,0.00035334035,0.0011446663,0.00001571149,0.000040159666,0.9497046,0.046544734,0.00019821481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010863677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033113977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1918648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000135071705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014100192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69637084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078990544","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00098.x","title":"Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Economic Justice; Virtue; Denial; Law and economics; Law; Subject (documents); Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04009014783141977,"score_gpt":0.22850228857581148,"score_spread":0.18841214074439172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078990544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7279609,0.008072593,0.000075792144,0.04207857,0.0011417377,0.00024568048,0.00021149447,0.000029198416,0.22018404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569297,0.00005644237,0.000028911985,0.00014102962,0.0027055647,7.3127995e-7,0.00000252423,0.000016480635,0.0013553761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913204,0.00010970819,0.00034663835,0.00007971785,0.00022170733,0.00011017284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989313,0.00017819244,0.0004355882,0.0001317666,0.00028883212,0.000034360102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000447102,0.000110959176,0.00019774915,0.00008191074,0.00028257098,0.000059161343,0.00017784513,0.000045508623,0.00015520543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031948315,0.00007139952,0.00009967406,0.000021586588,0.0005386306,0.00014965428,0.000020564017,0.0002591868,0.000018086861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012426506,0.00010067862,0.000031925923,0.0001030249,0.000079983605,0.000005100922,0.17771232,0.00001696987,0.00013793739,0.8208964,0.00027216258,0.0005192614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008860833,0.00049660256,0.0006023694,0.0002904978,0.00077625836,0.000039473278,0.06034711,0.00003567433,0.00027929177,0.9255805,0.0104228165,0.00024332516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019487091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000169867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26773205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011185667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029760635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2911588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087416828","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01809.x","title":"Aristotle's Theory of Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Analytic philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.048568168009053836,"score_gpt":0.3098308887936929,"score_spread":0.2612627207846391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087416828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45393252,0.0012683742,0.0035213039,0.037754446,0.0004056326,0.0002057036,0.000024865272,0.000023787265,0.50286335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781674,0.00009627337,0.000117628384,0.00023048223,0.0011078687,7.326094e-7,1.2780657e-7,0.0000070945957,0.0006230746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990828,0.00020125655,0.0002530183,0.000046684687,0.0003025321,0.00011368222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990512,0.00021161034,0.0003498208,0.00015086167,0.00016888433,0.000067626424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014210534,0.00005209564,0.00011578815,0.000034683882,0.00029548368,0.000017807633,0.0004872891,0.000035030098,0.00025571167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014908555,0.000031838124,0.00012465927,0.00017930995,0.000318545,0.00006747896,0.00002620184,0.00017670791,0.000067806555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006903289,0.00007272866,0.00027458306,0.000005717206,0.00004035826,0.0000041508715,0.026302269,0.000055020064,0.00030463398,0.9701928,0.00012069799,0.0025580295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019127382,0.000042637712,0.00019996104,0.000024797988,0.00011980761,0.000011126335,0.014014091,0.0000038800017,0.00003846579,0.92362225,0.061674874,0.000056814733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007221137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001517352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5438842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021869088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009254061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27998632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100178732","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01944.x","title":"Foucault after Hyppolite: Toward an A-Theistic Theodicy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Multiculturalism; Theodicy; Philosophy; Criticism; History and philosophy of science; Art history; Classics; Epistemology; Theology; History; Law; Art; Literature; Political science","score_opus":0.06604896464539492,"score_gpt":0.2710881779474994,"score_spread":0.20503921330210448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100178732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5522612,0.005329248,0.00017785872,0.10612156,0.0039586416,0.00045044324,0.00055766234,0.0001665117,0.3309769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97187144,0.000029678586,0.00007685687,0.0039078314,0.022692602,0.000004709694,0.000003788051,0.000056132627,0.0013569922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980501,0.0002509431,0.00064272474,0.00017494871,0.0005370297,0.00034425902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844855,0.00010482132,0.0004387448,0.00043757504,0.00036474664,0.00020558569],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008429549,0.00027078448,0.00035975926,0.00014876177,0.00037211753,0.00026003364,0.00075920153,0.000086253836,0.0020262904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006180109,0.00016251425,0.00039521654,0.000039721577,0.00077754265,0.00043737734,0.00006084201,0.00067315716,0.0007604567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000546214,0.00029770727,0.000028635604,0.000044395947,0.00025936714,0.00004795176,0.3028849,0.000038965827,0.00006932257,0.6924302,0.0005544865,0.0027978513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007691161,0.00034412477,0.00002325655,0.00009700918,0.00021056276,0.000091426606,0.0060817557,0.000042105075,0.00003126305,0.8853771,0.10663712,0.00029515495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004802203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054441552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41961023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004631683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007469459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100959722","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00045.x","title":"Yielding Actuality: Trust and Reason in Gillian Rose's Vision of Community","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Rationality; Epistemology; Friendship; Alterity; Sociology; Impossibility; Conviction; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.041607044259080996,"score_gpt":0.3280487834047635,"score_spread":0.2864417391456825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100959722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97033817,0.0009171114,0.000018324685,0.0037016426,0.000088969005,0.000057907673,0.0000054296247,0.0000043418536,0.024868133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992205,0.0002398465,0.00004977539,0.00012446764,0.00032225958,1.4441781e-7,1.5076365e-7,0.0000053520234,0.000037493526],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987684,0.00040547762,0.00032089168,0.000038158018,0.00030107668,0.00016603377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990633,0.00038866742,0.0002816809,0.0000957508,0.000108875414,0.00006170911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005017494,0.00006518209,0.00020268948,0.00007585887,0.0004349852,0.000024832663,0.0002615197,0.000056284764,0.00001547297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040096574,0.00004575054,0.00007046153,0.00018245284,0.00043257134,0.000111730194,0.000055295604,0.00038911207,0.0000017626814],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073024275,0.00053561345,0.07892762,0.00009473214,0.00017396743,0.00006149443,0.79850286,0.00000985528,0.0019515996,0.0062926994,0.0017486806,0.11097062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024092009,0.00087680784,0.1372941,0.0011228721,0.00011699484,0.000055627796,0.6313497,0.0000036579945,0.0009083377,0.21863776,0.0068219947,0.00040297743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001365341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005530336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21234506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033642085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027393167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33455986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104601679","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00088.x","title":"The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Wright; Epistemology; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Medicine; Art history","score_opus":0.06441762251572031,"score_gpt":0.26277322146600063,"score_spread":0.19835559895028032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104601679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27110875,0.008787474,0.0007975605,0.5853437,0.0056479755,0.0007728939,0.00006770995,0.00007501486,0.12739888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98804486,0.00007683127,0.000019661895,0.0036486727,0.0058821463,0.0000019614706,4.958425e-7,0.0000140395705,0.0023113575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985874,0.00035677594,0.000389162,0.00008763932,0.00034509282,0.00023390255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859744,0.00034026202,0.00035935955,0.0003729593,0.00026049613,0.00006949247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019629523,0.00013875174,0.00019219136,0.000036563422,0.0012099528,0.00016854428,0.0007250511,0.00004004518,0.000051649124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010976202,0.000055368117,0.0002541106,0.000046054833,0.0004587052,0.00008927285,0.00003131737,0.0005457606,0.00024533932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027328066,0.00011382716,0.000026751011,0.0000074872705,0.0001924332,0.000010373417,0.20571364,0.00011362303,0.0001632869,0.76778156,0.010171498,0.015432242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026373073,0.00036641932,0.000116406714,0.00004134703,0.0001057289,0.000027516608,0.0075103743,0.000012517321,0.000040666248,0.74939555,0.24199976,0.00012000364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025865957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009962217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7169361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020943253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045640558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109235385","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00127.x","title":"Puzzles about Trust","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Access Control and Trust","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Epistemology; Computational trust; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Reputation; Social science","score_opus":0.038166490388517,"score_gpt":0.2782668937827928,"score_spread":0.2401004033942758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109235385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7935263,0.0029699707,0.0001857739,0.028521787,0.00067743676,0.0001450986,0.000013565766,0.00003713098,0.17392291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949303,0.00021006477,0.000054160715,0.0004374295,0.0032003305,0.0000010094642,1.5788824e-7,0.000011729839,0.0011548041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986914,0.00021337264,0.00029417127,0.00006908103,0.00052131526,0.00021066393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990968,0.00011210671,0.00034602042,0.00014020638,0.00018395296,0.00012091986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007670535,0.0000913691,0.00019403553,0.000061569124,0.00083194085,0.0000431401,0.0006867065,0.000056113076,0.0003676517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013602158,0.000053221935,0.00021057275,0.00017000336,0.0005800036,0.00019490854,0.000026769601,0.00026068668,0.00019766114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010362146,0.0005529177,0.07706797,0.000026281119,0.0008447601,0.00063880207,0.3867708,0.00023749692,0.000393959,0.4932994,0.0056907237,0.03344068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034222547,0.00036128514,0.012370261,0.00015164794,0.0002549756,0.00032659754,0.026172433,0.00003089728,0.000088463996,0.7627584,0.19343233,0.0006304857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015320841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003274085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3605984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028599434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017123137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63987005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110946410","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00015.x","title":"Agent Reliabilism, Subjective Justification, and Epistemic Credit","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0411197691073327,"score_gpt":0.23919623394467543,"score_spread":0.19807646483734273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110946410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9097751,0.0037121044,0.00015417165,0.025584262,0.0019260067,0.0002477078,0.000087314336,0.000037634127,0.058475696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919937,0.00003958069,0.000047804606,0.00029015358,0.0052206665,0.0000024468904,0.0000027153228,0.000021041842,0.0023818898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889994,0.0001809889,0.00043709733,0.0001157419,0.00022507139,0.00014117567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986428,0.0002102355,0.00048990984,0.00020770806,0.00040202524,0.000047303078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000815785,0.0001323985,0.00023248118,0.000067102155,0.00033906943,0.000074956704,0.00023050944,0.000051527673,0.0000846759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058713387,0.00008200703,0.00014588563,0.00003063309,0.00081525784,0.00011000142,0.000024307486,0.00036837623,0.00005743995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009507983,0.00011779534,0.0005098401,0.000065745815,0.0001220657,0.0000102804415,0.077906474,0.000046101133,0.00043361317,0.9182264,0.0020334483,0.00043313848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038639567,0.00015281989,0.0004164334,0.000061573526,0.0001634159,0.000045132692,0.0069996254,0.000008785628,0.0001016737,0.9640473,0.0274847,0.00013211227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010355818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056120985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0822186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029034032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044474717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33441496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114070813","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00161.x","title":"Global Care Chains: Freedom, Responsibility, and Solidarity<sup>1</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04088998789279767,"score_gpt":0.31144448963354054,"score_spread":0.27055450174074286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114070813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9320391,0.0030212903,0.000011118217,0.018649908,0.00024295948,0.00017355617,0.00005980984,0.000028710565,0.045773584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497956,0.0004747105,0.000048212725,0.00038823517,0.003868754,0.0000013286732,2.6332273e-7,0.000009412204,0.000229509],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821717,0.00047001155,0.00032976503,0.000121384386,0.00056102505,0.00030066073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989875,0.00014940852,0.00024569407,0.00016157166,0.00030206892,0.00015378484],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009878221,0.0001400591,0.00029210476,0.00005198263,0.0017978423,0.00003803169,0.00041949865,0.00011606402,0.000013253996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004693531,0.000083801475,0.00021034831,0.0002780522,0.00190823,0.00013080813,0.00010619677,0.0002615706,0.000016354743],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034840472,0.00008267176,0.022050729,0.000025565192,0.0002558914,0.00006407367,0.8756042,0.000101735335,0.0000063036478,0.09932006,0.000575165,0.0015652173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013314042,0.00032626913,0.0063209627,0.00009072651,0.00012359941,0.00011855344,0.27389547,0.000015018636,0.000004919583,0.7144897,0.0029663886,0.00031696758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083236257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028725842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61516964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109197084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002731038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158332646","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00038.x","title":"How to Collaborate: Procedural Knowledge in the Cooperative Development of Science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Scarcity; Knowledge management; Descriptive knowledge; Naturalism; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.042824520251148926,"score_gpt":0.2420132347140211,"score_spread":0.19918871446287217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158332646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9134485,0.00058649696,0.000025080437,0.016480265,0.00041030004,0.00025757207,0.000019459845,0.000006455801,0.06876587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815637,7.588191e-7,0.00013693598,0.00030198816,0.00075323286,0.000004584416,2.3231719e-7,0.000006202898,0.00063967693],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876785,0.000076116536,0.00036096238,0.00011356241,0.00049313606,0.00018838183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987914,0.000053793236,0.00028261993,0.0001442113,0.0006815889,0.000046388395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013942501,0.00011603356,0.00018144443,0.00022529808,0.0007833137,0.00017552484,0.0010337675,0.000014688855,0.000031770105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050176746,0.000057552497,0.00005022182,0.0004126027,0.0020111315,0.0003280234,0.00004515339,0.00017937238,0.00002777682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009368638,0.00022801451,0.000027952346,0.00002063376,0.000012272513,0.0000057125844,0.56979233,0.00008003114,0.0049247225,0.42354673,0.00089995307,0.0003679439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023239162,0.0017858432,0.0012898202,0.00078633585,0.00008819137,0.00009100397,0.33547136,0.00006044747,0.01023559,0.33116883,0.31572986,0.000968822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010982966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3148299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072732495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005433189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7410098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806049702","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12274","title":"The Birth of <i>Being and Time</i>: Heidegger's Pivotal 1921 Reading of Aristotle's <i>On the Soul</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Soul; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Ontology; Key (lock); Fundamental ontology; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.019591509738731305,"score_gpt":0.25552376306344626,"score_spread":0.23593225332471496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806049702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.853263,0.0013444124,0.000043259963,0.014438897,0.0008335784,0.0002135917,0.000038376213,0.000014744991,0.12981014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742115,0.000029264733,0.000025165938,0.00068783935,0.0014819027,0.000002828796,4.8438625e-7,0.00003459466,0.0003167897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791414,0.0005444958,0.0007242355,0.0001769097,0.00033629418,0.00030395229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719214,0.00083114573,0.0010724915,0.000612004,0.00021648424,0.000075701755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018029654,0.0002172547,0.00040915544,0.00009587807,0.0005320171,0.00002391063,0.0008486108,0.00011488639,0.00017861069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012805307,0.00010231168,0.0002487451,0.00021371024,0.001841024,0.000060817696,0.00012749068,0.0006021889,0.00018590319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050136354,0.000448232,0.0018174294,0.00004558708,0.0023529523,0.000036527632,0.051180836,0.000018344703,0.021738455,0.911686,0.0021279727,0.0035340413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010261943,0.0016189303,0.00045780474,0.00015389507,0.00019733966,0.00018768958,0.0030836114,0.000012099888,0.0013536913,0.9892216,0.0025082084,0.00017896766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018341321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014123891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14415812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013998294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032980093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.678333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366683289","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12510","title":"Raging better: Reflections on the Myisha Cherry's <i>The Case for Rage</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rage (emotion); Typology; Argument (complex analysis); Anger; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14637272239167584,"score_gpt":0.3781314620560827,"score_spread":0.23175873966440688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366683289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8385897,0.00015309024,0.0002540422,0.15033016,0.0013563707,0.00042774144,0.000085042506,0.000051396055,0.008752455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993252,0.000006017025,0.000042087147,0.00303578,0.0016271465,0.000047583842,0.0000013007456,0.000042276846,0.0019458341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998797,0.00030263362,0.00034498292,0.00012952593,0.00016550915,0.00026033807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985387,0.0005267105,0.0002878312,0.00047869113,0.000111714544,0.00005637333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014203656,0.00014339999,0.00016241506,0.0001012825,0.0008426714,0.00005871539,0.00048825503,0.000059744754,0.00033446122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058674825,0.00006373507,0.00033953835,0.0003669059,0.00014800784,0.00003933318,0.000040327992,0.00056884135,0.00045223988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022120941,0.001640156,0.000835323,0.000075417105,0.0029924859,0.0059137205,0.24622999,0.0010482019,0.018810693,0.35964575,0.2946548,0.06594136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006887101,0.0028365932,0.00259842,0.00040518446,0.001948838,0.01736126,0.11406458,0.00015887212,0.00058088644,0.6348903,0.21717763,0.0010903396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031649197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011224086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27524453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002615994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020613024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6481232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380356787","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12522","title":"Expressing and receiving negative emotions: Comments on Myisha Cherry's <i>The Case for Rage</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rage (emotion); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.09392404286219735,"score_gpt":0.3515936713885609,"score_spread":0.25766962852636355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380356787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97904044,0.00017462466,0.00019338277,0.017760452,0.0005792078,0.00032190728,0.00007995591,0.000025318604,0.001824737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770105,0.000011875744,0.00014238623,0.00073087274,0.00065283856,0.000019546607,0.000001266558,0.000030711435,0.0007094693],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897885,0.00026879372,0.00030802737,0.00012513455,0.0001235461,0.00019561968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987433,0.00052639627,0.0003137635,0.00025405313,0.000097495795,0.000064971464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000908584,0.00012782673,0.00017251981,0.00009267186,0.00056115084,0.000060338298,0.00022572953,0.000055265034,0.0000974404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092454924,0.000071293354,0.00014176981,0.00018289163,0.00014179928,0.00006793817,0.00004548355,0.00033552304,0.000064529595],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003718187,0.002532588,0.0044095316,0.00022546647,0.0028182396,0.0055268356,0.5730428,0.00080919947,0.013901817,0.054542102,0.09271242,0.24576081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021663008,0.0052360184,0.024127392,0.0027296038,0.0020420589,0.014135645,0.2579191,0.00052543916,0.00090928306,0.64935154,0.019643938,0.0017169748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024596007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037812026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5948095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020863457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011502129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43159753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388133135","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12545","title":"Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Existentialism; Naturalism; Ontology; Rationality; Parallels; GRASP; Analytic philosophy; Character (mathematics); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08482429848669673,"score_gpt":0.29481864546611003,"score_spread":0.2099943469794133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388133135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6882759,0.0012686295,0.0000037907719,0.2380548,0.00070322765,0.00021379559,0.0000493605,0.000037138183,0.07139338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954409,0.00008978173,0.0000025749782,0.002588625,0.0015714519,0.0000036920699,0.0000017106513,0.00002371535,0.00027754199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981278,0.00064673397,0.00050441315,0.00012168405,0.00036550578,0.00023382815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982971,0.0009890392,0.00031852687,0.00021742668,0.00010867231,0.000069233836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039557284,0.00015776033,0.00033016884,0.00015049978,0.0006925313,0.00011921935,0.00047390995,0.000110922345,0.0001816762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017671645,0.00007873434,0.00018077978,0.0000867455,0.0022737125,0.00008075713,0.000121676036,0.0018016614,0.00009606408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012581481,0.00003260591,0.000084722815,0.000015149315,0.00007413032,0.000029793697,0.098304294,0.0000074371246,0.000026980273,0.9011262,0.000026465857,0.00014639489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014264866,0.000116531344,0.00013397637,0.00007406723,0.000040277864,0.000033361113,0.008571542,0.000021545478,0.0000033364722,0.98380125,0.0056773587,0.00010025791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019758311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004759661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30716503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002348859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051376457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394692283","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12554","title":"The concept of unlivability: A reading of Frantz Fanon's “The North African Syndrome” (1952)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Colonialism; Reading (process); Resistance (ecology); Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Gender studies; Anthropology; History; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0324209632371599,"score_gpt":0.2918188526448891,"score_spread":0.25939788940772923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394692283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9166198,0.011042699,0.000106626285,0.0464139,0.00084041443,0.00026860528,0.0000478977,0.000019695268,0.024640368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998652,0.0005104612,0.000012074947,0.00007822635,0.0005419296,0.00000153659,1.401321e-7,0.000009313606,0.00019436295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811816,0.0004596635,0.00050537346,0.00009374908,0.000591772,0.00023130406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800277,0.001108001,0.00041399596,0.00020754765,0.00020545506,0.00006222024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014165876,0.00011432921,0.00031304054,0.000030060184,0.0009864942,0.000046967867,0.0007919425,0.00005097863,0.00019572028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002894156,0.000043052645,0.00032660054,0.0004358952,0.003741134,0.000071578375,0.00008862648,0.00035396556,0.000013606239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026719595,0.00019800306,0.0031640502,0.00006275099,0.0012214592,0.00007453437,0.438302,0.00009133798,0.000092393486,0.53460705,0.0011212393,0.020797957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005197667,0.0014504548,0.0023674346,0.00041935575,0.00039114206,0.000058702983,0.3918288,0.000040251693,0.000114502014,0.48041615,0.122092366,0.00030106292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006148261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017285522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12097113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004350549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104132894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395075826","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12568","title":"The young Leibniz's tentative acceptance of physical occasionalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04036566334219853,"score_gpt":0.25991667061199303,"score_spread":0.21955100726979448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395075826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54748917,0.019056698,0.0003039168,0.060219985,0.009276882,0.0005146016,0.00033940337,0.00010176493,0.3626976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943598,0.00002363994,0.000013334832,0.00012912048,0.0038555095,0.0000017939682,2.962947e-7,0.000013928019,0.0016025915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869674,0.00012540784,0.000359067,0.000108671025,0.0005540254,0.00015609288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884105,0.0004551813,0.00024086272,0.0001822985,0.00022096203,0.000059631693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057202694,0.0001258374,0.00019967744,0.000056222085,0.00053711317,0.00013722798,0.0006819327,0.000019340967,0.00015372873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063942236,0.000054021868,0.00033141908,0.00010956915,0.0010854319,0.00023027972,0.000043932003,0.00038900107,0.0001182738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056729412,0.000046535188,0.000008143028,0.000014235407,0.00007943198,0.000018125058,0.12961851,0.000017864355,0.0003500701,0.86759186,0.0009298821,0.001268604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015972767,0.0002855058,0.000025296058,0.00013799558,0.00007947191,0.000041743733,0.007542511,0.00016214263,0.00011012117,0.9456097,0.0457241,0.000121700716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013842668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000073627252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44687063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038048955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006269465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41310945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396614204","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12560","title":"Touching the wounds of colonial duration: Fanon's anticolonial critical phenomenology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Colonialism; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.040803107973577335,"score_gpt":0.34300753440253273,"score_spread":0.3022044264289554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396614204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54497874,0.0068833325,0.00092861097,0.39135972,0.003288268,0.00022446278,0.000020121517,0.000036343732,0.05228044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543315,0.00021798821,0.00005064153,0.00037260665,0.003806603,0.0000014706104,1.3517007e-7,0.0000074437917,0.00010998927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998502,0.0004035606,0.0003928231,0.000092884424,0.00039037288,0.00021831975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987621,0.0007608202,0.00015877745,0.0000979061,0.00016653448,0.00005390141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010263294,0.00009241786,0.00022479352,0.000036276837,0.001026474,0.00008963333,0.00045541365,0.00008347823,0.0006363134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038184517,0.00004215167,0.00018493751,0.00021644337,0.0024758386,0.00011078847,0.000067396395,0.00038730452,0.000039111612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111052475,0.00006492687,0.00012042874,0.000013218307,0.0001481194,0.000039295264,0.0689016,0.0000083078585,0.00023360894,0.92739296,0.00054210145,0.00242436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037637813,0.0012072795,0.0003346428,0.00012791912,0.00022908446,0.00005789163,0.04110865,0.000068963316,0.00006765911,0.8549726,0.10125788,0.0001910731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017638411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008612314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4504544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005032137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013350708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91223305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400546234","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12582","title":"Thoughts on the structure of the history of Africana philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.046482331154765286,"score_gpt":0.25614837344161145,"score_spread":0.20966604228684615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400546234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40379506,0.02240069,0.000011941972,0.41884467,0.005914489,0.0007100945,0.0003584136,0.00005162462,0.14791302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939023,0.00009927903,0.000010103402,0.00054445653,0.004442808,9.580058e-7,2.2022762e-7,0.00001678082,0.0009830935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749726,0.00061504525,0.00050522696,0.00013811831,0.0010319203,0.00021243743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981429,0.00065889966,0.0005649654,0.00030812685,0.0002488845,0.00007620373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076563447,0.00018955745,0.00034563424,0.000057296238,0.000429708,0.000020809293,0.0012605146,0.000088620756,0.00021447602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002637117,0.00006785618,0.00053256785,0.00047899433,0.0020010388,0.00008084185,0.00010225918,0.000669062,0.00001514316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016048481,0.00008337796,0.00014025063,0.000072191506,0.0005296167,0.000009086725,0.16537742,0.0000579155,0.0023963281,0.82287836,0.007480597,0.00081436615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116911724,0.00015301484,0.00009111152,0.00029379467,0.00014338917,0.000005919955,0.0042111115,0.0000036138326,0.0002185822,0.93994397,0.05470571,0.000112897396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103686994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036193167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59010726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001894428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024714877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73729104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401549937","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12586","title":"Preparing the particular: Kant on the imagination's role in judgment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Imagination; Psychology","score_opus":0.032848372017029684,"score_gpt":0.24699547904191083,"score_spread":0.21414710702488116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401549937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28878978,0.0066471454,0.00002838879,0.46612996,0.0013237564,0.0004147712,0.00003778542,0.00004834652,0.23658007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956033,0.00003405039,0.0000015313009,0.0021344991,0.0020242964,0.0000100259795,3.860435e-7,0.000021231945,0.00017068555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986408,0.00028787242,0.0003518531,0.00010847476,0.00043769757,0.00017332737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988646,0.0005973054,0.0001374513,0.00027250458,0.00008960957,0.000038562386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022215932,0.00013393215,0.00014263307,0.00007314943,0.00034975374,0.000323307,0.00052324985,0.000028645538,0.00029867055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090595015,0.000050091196,0.00020670866,0.000067095396,0.00044987703,0.00010204807,0.00006531272,0.00086991274,0.00018966504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004018029,0.000048671012,0.000003481296,0.000009914529,0.00008672045,0.0000141083265,0.047371026,0.00015856844,0.000056111352,0.951311,0.00012148741,0.00077872636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012468621,0.000078644516,0.0000078519115,0.00020742287,0.000045170076,0.000012947058,0.0033694005,0.0006317057,0.00006612825,0.9678594,0.027524173,0.000072472285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020450936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026910138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7068135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040214723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004918185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37793863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406098040","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12612","title":"A common measure: Hobbes on the epistemic functions of public reason","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Sovereignty; Epistemology; Politics; Measure (data warehouse); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08143138602242155,"score_gpt":0.2541070526870265,"score_spread":0.17267566666460493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406098040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2507982,0.0035047338,0.00006403347,0.36969817,0.0018341531,0.00034664723,0.00024597993,0.000038822305,0.37346926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948334,0.00002892096,0.0000026362165,0.0016244332,0.0017171187,0.00000478013,0.0000020463506,0.00001545247,0.0017711908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981611,0.0004964482,0.0005694553,0.000105990664,0.00044368047,0.0002233386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981881,0.0006982462,0.000353717,0.00037794004,0.0002971172,0.00008492763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009811028,0.00017320135,0.0003252293,0.000120734425,0.00043818966,0.000088438275,0.000628101,0.000051461833,0.00071889174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022895611,0.000079381614,0.00041467953,0.00012649792,0.0006926203,0.00007916639,0.000057064568,0.0005652556,0.00011237488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013724771,0.00021067564,0.000091511676,0.000023394576,0.00025092403,0.0000021074352,0.0034597327,0.0000035547444,0.000038286867,0.9933457,0.0014045933,0.0010323056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004136002,0.00024223686,0.000054605505,0.00033910017,0.00015464533,0.00001061251,0.003028989,0.000008738335,0.00007806301,0.92378163,0.07179041,0.00009736629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022581666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015664886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7440352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003716569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058003676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7871361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}