{"meta":{"query_hash":"9bb96700732d","filters":{"venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":32,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":32,"exported":32,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9bb96700732d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Southern+Journal+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1493767296","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00121.x","title":"DERRIDA ON THE DEATH PENALTY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Deconstruction (building); Sovereignty; Abolitionism; Philosophy; Renunciation; Capital punishment; Politics; Reading (process); Punishment (psychology); Conscience; Law; Epistemology; Capital (architecture); Literature; Theology; Political science; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Art","score_opus":0.11956394809336791,"score_gpt":0.27402274967074963,"score_spread":0.15445880157738173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493767296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058071904,0.014788936,0.0066835834,0.2490634,0.0042647216,0.000037973783,0.00011714833,0.000079974896,0.66689247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557334,0.0021196846,0.00063364743,0.030505477,0.0008338341,0.00008839452,0.000030160054,0.000056557274,0.109998845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978758,0.0010951756,0.000070154434,0.00028212418,0.00037704493,0.00029964047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992213,0.00036194694,0.00006131402,0.00009794338,0.00019497826,0.00006248304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021621976,0.00033376398,0.000352531,0.0005759471,0.003706589,0.0031545341,0.0009637094,0.0043819556,0.0039841086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042416477,0.00013684167,0.0003057273,0.00029083414,0.015506444,0.0024847218,0.0051953853,0.0057322844,0.00072271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013482825,0.0000053176022,0.000069554815,0.000014953233,0.0000018155664,0.00005709627,0.0022827536,0.00014500393,0.00009655117,0.9820784,0.013072615,0.0021625028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019019459,0.00002150188,0.00039423912,0.00019121243,0.000005171778,0.00010501785,0.0021667622,0.00033505933,0.0005905416,0.29990563,0.69623935,0.000026472824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009015256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054149786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009015256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067212763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002089472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048766494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533970978","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00095.x","title":"WHEN THINKING HESITATES: PHILOSOPHY AS PROSTHESIS AND TRANSFORMATIVE VISION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Perception; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Temporality; Sociology","score_opus":0.030454718429926916,"score_gpt":0.28951092938332423,"score_spread":0.2590562109533973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533970978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12910412,0.008632014,0.119225845,0.17212208,0.0026336098,0.00008590287,0.000049802235,0.0004368451,0.5677098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98194903,0.00090479397,0.004181493,0.004360163,0.00019393272,0.000035399342,0.000009341444,0.000093789844,0.008271954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932647,0.0045487713,0.00011358505,0.00054004625,0.000996299,0.0005366921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948323,0.0031648506,0.00048446044,0.0005569149,0.00052151276,0.00044006947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009102637,0.0004494984,0.00044546122,0.0011091697,0.0038703503,0.011029579,0.0009812252,0.004216685,0.0030575478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010630306,0.0003556586,0.0005344949,0.00063857005,0.06384808,0.0168305,0.006606336,0.0075751403,0.00057015836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000125522665,0.000008819772,0.00012094461,0.00001998808,0.0000041565136,0.000114064795,0.03141436,0.00013857392,0.00018526094,0.96317667,0.001977026,0.0028277102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013081364,0.000023255669,0.00015445582,0.00006599077,0.0000053654794,0.00020362053,0.01838599,0.0006011052,0.00030746748,0.9366077,0.043613173,0.000018755298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00117956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007397478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011029579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044612843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030284354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04813993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1727638832","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00074.x","title":"IN DEFENSE OF THE WHAT‐IT‐IS‐LIKENESS OF EXPERIENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Phrase; Unconscious mind; Interpretation (philosophy); Hacker; Mental state; Consciousness; Subject (documents); Popularity; State (computer science); Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Computer science; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.0657146296348593,"score_gpt":0.302250454041192,"score_spread":0.2365358244063327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1727638832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06919683,0.0024343522,0.07392453,0.093228996,0.001420029,0.000049256647,0.0001522508,0.000142667,0.7594511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848973,0.00046685897,0.0026534377,0.0045066085,0.0006450941,0.000049058926,0.0000521488,0.00006120494,0.0066683753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589133,0.0021769942,0.00019044521,0.0008702033,0.0006062625,0.0002647693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99105704,0.0049569528,0.00086005,0.0017351714,0.0010000585,0.00039067486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005261713,0.0003338445,0.00051134103,0.0011241094,0.0031012797,0.0062122424,0.001625295,0.004034836,0.0064107603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012891582,0.0003204938,0.0005371801,0.00083429297,0.041995127,0.012769221,0.0052125296,0.005717492,0.0006627723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009807177,0.0000032799464,0.0001546764,0.000020885675,0.0000037416,0.000060623694,0.002081158,0.000055838886,0.000072283285,0.99576545,0.0006816668,0.0010904827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073126944,0.000011890623,0.00029515178,0.00004514771,0.0000065722584,0.00016704902,0.0014830892,0.00033633682,0.000105640116,0.9826659,0.014867315,0.000008441724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011628207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006750231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064107603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018908891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009479097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027826965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914511293","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00091.x","title":"COHERENCE: THE PRICE IS RIGHT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Argument (complex analysis); Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04977269533428182,"score_gpt":0.22939181229589595,"score_spread":0.17961911696161412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914511293","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009417806,0.01393248,0.02403257,0.81445277,0.0061428235,0.000035768633,0.00029439473,0.00012688158,0.1315644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8326374,0.011387469,0.010234789,0.09639667,0.013953483,0.00015980926,0.00027165242,0.00040485238,0.03455379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961616,0.0049513015,0.00051731255,0.0012878678,0.0030188577,0.00060849823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95791584,0.026274018,0.0015144709,0.0067169736,0.0060093133,0.0015694496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0133923385,0.00040569133,0.0010962161,0.0012506983,0.0037536765,0.009679029,0.0013137476,0.006039021,0.026489485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055919766,0.00041967232,0.00054824376,0.0015767178,0.02657851,0.02748365,0.0050776447,0.011422017,0.0033207438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023686021,0.000005472122,0.00010599871,0.000054887667,0.000009895862,0.000017515933,0.00033603888,0.00011077773,0.000040122755,0.97469735,0.01693249,0.0076657827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024363238,0.000008239199,0.00015515198,0.00012442522,0.0000063095904,0.000026327647,0.0004173751,0.00019379798,0.000054652442,0.9516135,0.047366012,0.000009871776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005208647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037562572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026489485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003938487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036437789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08861619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942090137","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12080","title":"Some Features of Promises and their Obligations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Moral obligation; Normative; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02722561487486898,"score_gpt":0.22988759999919123,"score_spread":0.20266198512432224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942090137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1930099,0.0018226681,0.14770304,0.019767867,0.00025764518,0.0001103458,0.00022652102,0.00023194966,0.63687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838657,0.00034455094,0.006025852,0.00034334464,0.00014150863,0.00007369093,0.000042020794,0.000042894553,0.009120376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968749,0.0014984234,0.000136613,0.00030227864,0.0008297547,0.00035791035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935408,0.0038893272,0.0006841903,0.00073256233,0.0008379027,0.0003150884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004701448,0.000201932,0.0003057661,0.0011122725,0.00289859,0.0041511944,0.0010141095,0.0024066144,0.009267698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011578302,0.00041962886,0.0005703489,0.000956442,0.008242363,0.012657254,0.0033444655,0.0025475514,0.0008211296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006660584,0.000002733691,0.000085320135,0.0000075616235,0.0000010020098,0.00003660161,0.0006737879,0.00010102473,0.00010256164,0.9976421,0.00030771262,0.0010328912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007268561,0.000011241332,0.00029852797,0.000020562748,0.0000035667667,0.00009663368,0.0005029783,0.0011038539,0.00013329802,0.9889691,0.00884534,0.0000075572134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011725142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007800277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009267698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002287787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001005288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031003475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975675069","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00131.x","title":"On Cheering Charles Bronson: The Ethics of Vigilantism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Parade; Relevance (law); Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09622889416789544,"score_gpt":0.2767592872719903,"score_spread":0.18053039310409486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975675069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03315505,0.018335937,0.012370507,0.35933113,0.0012696617,0.000059516024,0.00004053144,0.000042238127,0.5753954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415499,0.0033092003,0.002107976,0.02508901,0.0008531032,0.00006236459,0.000008409004,0.00003801267,0.026981913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944635,0.003734448,0.00013314422,0.00041337044,0.000802562,0.00045299326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945576,0.00378171,0.00035733334,0.00031784768,0.00072781526,0.00025771873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008158798,0.0002748582,0.00032484936,0.00086967065,0.006007313,0.0065999404,0.0009758682,0.0071902703,0.0028551463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01006305,0.00025146498,0.00024158749,0.0007051757,0.05093296,0.0048973006,0.0030772577,0.0071601374,0.00037696495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002856577,0.0000028485706,0.00006346802,0.000009131898,0.0000012593783,0.000041630887,0.0019585665,0.000048755337,0.000025053123,0.9925775,0.0042957393,0.0009732307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007361542,0.0000068872537,0.00018041114,0.00016574666,0.0000029731123,0.00005516988,0.001791877,0.00024089032,0.00009381823,0.9338317,0.06361205,0.000011011805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01046006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009187923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01046006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005440364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042069755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0431484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987355271","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00007.x","title":"Epistemic Side Constraints and the Structure of Epistemic Normativity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rationality; Constraint (computer-aided design); Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.023699987076120508,"score_gpt":0.22233272757256536,"score_spread":0.19863274049644486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987355271","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05978231,0.00091257837,0.5849089,0.01051729,0.00041717416,0.00011945459,0.00018154543,0.00018494399,0.34297574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93062943,0.00040979098,0.059147257,0.0010476721,0.00032057465,0.00028121416,0.00011905608,0.00010225068,0.007942748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98817676,0.006617328,0.00060436793,0.0012726024,0.0026030245,0.00072591717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98425806,0.0088990405,0.0012120395,0.0025783547,0.0024128202,0.00063969084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009499939,0.0005059699,0.0007826411,0.001445649,0.0034690385,0.0060031833,0.0014366255,0.002671095,0.0060630054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014422711,0.00054055284,0.0008207071,0.0013333306,0.01695412,0.011867718,0.0057819188,0.0049844543,0.00077258056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053962926,0.0000029734558,0.000042358955,0.000009723809,0.000002311716,0.000013723601,0.00024888213,0.000165511,0.00008667911,0.99847585,0.00011471557,0.0008319111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006914779,0.000004899928,0.000034965233,0.00001352186,0.000002414995,0.00001424879,0.000090092755,0.0006953273,0.00013830415,0.9960537,0.0029414855,0.00000420613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006509883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071925257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009499939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019788737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025276127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050241053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009749450","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00158.x","title":"Theory to Practice and Practice to Theory? Lessons from Local NGO Empowerment Projects in Indonesia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Empowerment; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.09597409301164248,"score_gpt":0.4234417654821513,"score_spread":0.3274676724705088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009749450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6262822,0.0030613916,0.013002633,0.100345865,0.0005251951,0.0013341006,0.000034273336,0.00010232841,0.25531197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98291796,0.0011072172,0.004859369,0.0016100622,0.000027413282,0.00046448837,0.000009748571,0.000032515294,0.008971274],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862141,0.010937036,0.00025610664,0.00045072552,0.00085698994,0.0012851894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804818,0.014621693,0.00056702027,0.00089468656,0.00064809615,0.002786756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023418581,0.0006360169,0.00069161534,0.0009369709,0.012789802,0.011632599,0.0027408204,0.0028456282,0.0057227938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017375208,0.00069647585,0.00033575625,0.0016945557,0.024309138,0.008336453,0.011571645,0.007815966,0.0006676869],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082278704,0.0015902383,0.009113513,0.000690854,0.000009962235,0.0014434312,0.74615306,0.00054590835,0.000429236,0.11795518,0.0051971627,0.116789185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007631119,0.00021837442,0.0061046947,0.0013770793,0.000015352542,0.00032891205,0.90911955,0.0009644651,0.0005212055,0.046469912,0.034778386,0.000025800862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066585597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01670913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023418581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010697987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026114775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12385076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010343456","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00057.x","title":"The <i>Meno's</i> Metaphilosophical Examples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Contrast (vision); Epistemology; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sketch; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04833043365752451,"score_gpt":0.2417534965416718,"score_spread":0.1934230628841473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010343456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024591122,0.0038087985,0.02994977,0.032713827,0.00085058913,0.0000343724,0.00009014397,0.00010797147,0.9078535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96022594,0.0012856834,0.0057284795,0.0026005213,0.00058948545,0.00007351558,0.000041971885,0.00006714896,0.02938721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778455,0.0014998693,0.000053507472,0.00012263012,0.0003902691,0.00014924734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985911,0.00073797954,0.00013782407,0.00019689214,0.00024278316,0.00009340472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020950483,0.00040187046,0.0002993993,0.0012731313,0.003454735,0.0038703303,0.00088366953,0.0016161565,0.005199912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005205875,0.00019234576,0.00030184322,0.0009030883,0.017845737,0.0037790092,0.0022649912,0.0028481446,0.0007686569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005376809,0.0000036471697,0.000046223264,0.000016530272,0.0000011263613,0.00002931647,0.0021253964,0.00005027422,0.000052268937,0.9937708,0.0025938796,0.0013051288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015120678,0.000013142248,0.00042751845,0.00019467964,0.000006134533,0.00018042997,0.003794625,0.0012270185,0.0005422874,0.7248153,0.2687677,0.000016035085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032088265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036464392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005199912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00244257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000891864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01772213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011703803","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00132.x","title":"Free Love: A Hegelian Defense of Same‐Sex Marriage Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Duty; Institution; Mount; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02495260672409235,"score_gpt":0.27786896941250144,"score_spread":0.2529163626884091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011703803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056697678,0.009749846,0.060449786,0.114383265,0.000857601,0.00006432076,0.000051935363,0.00006121039,0.7576844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948313,0.0026486148,0.00604678,0.010599544,0.00045869156,0.00008620795,0.000017191807,0.000022631548,0.031807166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967519,0.0019996935,0.00006986388,0.00025897895,0.00063732546,0.00028223675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804246,0.001211621,0.00012658787,0.00022319861,0.00021484954,0.00018120914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054949834,0.00025379268,0.00044560333,0.0009078248,0.0031322932,0.0044910084,0.0008578782,0.0032096151,0.002918338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031092567,0.00017596154,0.0003829605,0.0004269451,0.058039322,0.004429507,0.0047520213,0.0059913383,0.00044971477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020275222,0.0000024596504,0.000014404534,0.0000033231404,6.7103963e-7,0.0000075562766,0.0008316817,0.000044659122,0.0000183948,0.99822956,0.00031578954,0.0005294992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007824152,0.0000087004555,0.00004813872,0.00003666646,0.0000018311844,0.000033198823,0.0008201952,0.00016348112,0.00008864069,0.9749419,0.023844898,0.0000044252474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019874016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019430362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054949834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003551014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044739856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029060602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042947784","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01982.x","title":"Comments on Sarah Broadie “Virtue and beyond in Plato and Aristotle”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Citation; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.027849842312379778,"score_gpt":0.22645211781133123,"score_spread":0.19860227549895146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042947784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044698874,0.002190713,0.00012883174,0.9719355,0.01996254,0.000009411407,0.0000643914,0.00001617996,0.0052454337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005212322,0.0008593502,0.00010971928,0.9633813,0.019460296,0.00003867553,0.0000214076,0.000041001953,0.010875918],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925553,0.0019706362,0.00056183216,0.0017439857,0.0019533474,0.0012148458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97254634,0.018615749,0.001465335,0.00079676294,0.005347742,0.0012280924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00869393,0.0014949527,0.00250315,0.0019908207,0.0171438,0.009574585,0.0053938585,0.06305379,0.013568179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04353477,0.0012638441,0.0016954875,0.0027379845,0.015000424,0.0135212885,0.009214327,0.058304157,0.0061512194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026443353,0.0000067107,0.00008225106,0.00005003511,0.0000086355485,0.00013019277,0.0019587905,0.000030384605,0.000057663703,0.01912741,0.9774359,0.0010856031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037085014,0.000015562466,0.0011991244,0.0005703934,0.000028334292,0.00012672575,0.0059924494,0.00016244742,0.00030878035,0.027011612,0.9644568,0.000090613205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039829813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068276234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06305379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007904187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072410167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079195976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052308120","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00048.x","title":"The Temporality of Life: Merleau‐Ponty, Bergson, and the Immemorial Past","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01786531883805733,"score_gpt":0.21434492383173734,"score_spread":0.19647960499368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052308120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22044902,0.03106884,0.021269778,0.08980234,0.0010308203,0.00003613404,0.0001482113,0.000058180365,0.63613665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894739,0.0024492277,0.00086615805,0.00062585046,0.000119533055,0.000017030738,0.000014077016,0.000015494039,0.006418841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989064,0.0006335936,0.00002695158,0.00015140319,0.00015793004,0.00012380547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981584,0.0011467446,0.00024255882,0.00011064294,0.00017766624,0.00016404824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001984741,0.0002893909,0.00024411501,0.0011270988,0.0036369178,0.0074608624,0.00068272144,0.0018385934,0.004327802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00397183,0.00020533164,0.00017828609,0.001319389,0.028959554,0.013129832,0.0029625192,0.0024740584,0.00022961943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010998606,0.000004468572,0.00011127898,0.000018962663,9.552359e-7,0.000072634844,0.0195267,0.00006528143,0.000032945365,0.9774629,0.000917299,0.0017756463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011997614,0.000017971346,0.00057207973,0.00018867906,0.0000039444203,0.00027416297,0.035886817,0.00032007004,0.00012686642,0.8300546,0.13252458,0.000018153334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008100532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056661586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008100532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005714814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023495203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04146409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075924159","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00086.x","title":"Malebranche and Descartes on Method: Psychologism, Free Will, and Doubt","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Psychologism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Relation (database); Subject (documents); Cartesianism; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.07650655209298385,"score_gpt":0.25161154222283755,"score_spread":0.1751049901298537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075924159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030917767,0.046121795,0.040796783,0.21272634,0.002617845,0.000052308984,0.00008749269,0.000095723495,0.6665839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941149,0.010295459,0.0051532355,0.008113199,0.0022268305,0.00006501173,0.000027354221,0.00007572273,0.032894183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948586,0.003541796,0.00011934692,0.00024328924,0.0010230656,0.00021396572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99071395,0.007409599,0.00033057353,0.00050290936,0.000800258,0.00024263727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005130381,0.0003464162,0.0005076796,0.002125402,0.00281176,0.0050701825,0.00064983446,0.003366939,0.0026394855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010737777,0.00022979728,0.00035444225,0.0012088179,0.03583101,0.0047939653,0.00235578,0.00420391,0.00037400986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032735934,0.0000014186174,0.000018901537,0.0000084963685,8.4299796e-7,0.000016920558,0.0007317643,0.000055369004,0.00001047347,0.99662423,0.0015284105,0.0009999725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045411575,0.000003178076,0.00007037881,0.000035116704,0.0000014087343,0.000025674073,0.00030013043,0.0001303729,0.000044761695,0.96402067,0.03535887,0.000004966563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048514027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038691298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00515046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00515046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020751443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03736943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078990544","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00098.x","title":"Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Economic Justice; Virtue; Denial; Law and economics; Law; Subject (documents); Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04009014783141977,"score_gpt":0.22850228857581148,"score_spread":0.18841214074439172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078990544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061732173,0.002023523,0.049844004,0.06153321,0.0006007451,0.00006507918,0.00004854466,0.00006440741,0.82408834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384908,0.00073535054,0.00893221,0.008828811,0.00031179163,0.00013571557,0.000024877274,0.000050663606,0.042489864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563247,0.0020345019,0.00014685332,0.00049965037,0.0012514368,0.00043506053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973406,0.0012307491,0.00025616348,0.0004782511,0.00043789024,0.0002563084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066651166,0.00039073123,0.00047304804,0.00060608436,0.0040682615,0.0042427676,0.0010932642,0.0038510715,0.0031368826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005482217,0.00024305227,0.00050392724,0.00040744664,0.028972197,0.0054238713,0.004994549,0.0055333404,0.000634643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025992936,0.0000036943552,0.000044144883,0.000005318299,8.8635437e-7,0.000009549914,0.00040219334,0.000050187795,0.00003259618,0.9980076,0.00048980216,0.00095147063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008408028,0.000009090631,0.00020819946,0.000028675613,0.0000021505398,0.000035339286,0.00028155098,0.00023361194,0.000094891206,0.97584593,0.02324624,0.0000057952607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002234779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029362356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066651166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035238725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039818916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035248876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087416828","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01809.x","title":"Aristotle's Theory of Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Analytic philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.048568168009053836,"score_gpt":0.3098308887936929,"score_spread":0.2612627207846391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087416828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007515504,0.005997184,0.06762736,0.035308186,0.0025147449,0.00012455997,0.00023669949,0.0001565615,0.8805192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75341034,0.004852525,0.04248855,0.01794822,0.004402267,0.0005749778,0.00012091504,0.00016734212,0.17603473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956774,0.0014990905,0.0002537759,0.0005845316,0.0014099192,0.0005752821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978514,0.0010045923,0.00015621741,0.00025116713,0.0005818469,0.00015486033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004580175,0.0009254347,0.0019289559,0.004670972,0.009531512,0.0072500715,0.0015504328,0.009008225,0.0060762116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005634832,0.00079884566,0.0012737748,0.0024984395,0.033151668,0.008802963,0.0034658636,0.009425901,0.0017698465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016793712,0.0000021345995,0.000008420142,0.0000073037104,0.0000019026684,0.000006711248,0.00018210168,0.000047411326,0.0000053657377,0.9975715,0.0015195828,0.0006458369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063054863,0.0000030086455,0.000031279375,0.000013733154,0.0000023363832,0.000014485251,0.0000419679,0.00008269184,0.000017459572,0.98791075,0.011871162,0.0000047596855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010495319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013294465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010495319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008439918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063293506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061236143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100178732","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01944.x","title":"Foucault after Hyppolite: Toward an A-Theistic Theodicy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Multiculturalism; Theodicy; Philosophy; Criticism; History and philosophy of science; Art history; Classics; Epistemology; Theology; History; Law; Art; Literature; Political science","score_opus":0.06604896464539492,"score_gpt":0.2710881779474994,"score_spread":0.20503921330210448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100178732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010521087,0.012720828,0.0696751,0.43775004,0.010807809,0.000078182675,0.00006917254,0.00031653722,0.45806116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7277416,0.006010068,0.037085015,0.07763141,0.0063789506,0.00039400955,0.000059849815,0.0009951602,0.143704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935818,0.0046463143,0.00013849587,0.00047220066,0.00081401184,0.0003471559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287236,0.0040068403,0.00034999195,0.00091140403,0.0011682115,0.000691117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009288566,0.0005536487,0.0007315818,0.0017467362,0.011657476,0.01041504,0.0013912461,0.0053226943,0.0062641357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014653805,0.00034514343,0.00046017932,0.0010377923,0.054625936,0.011237152,0.0062307543,0.01474514,0.0014955507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007868514,0.000007806507,0.000027131735,0.00001277611,0.0000012908533,0.000010511798,0.0023283965,0.00002943617,0.00002324772,0.9848124,0.0095884465,0.00315067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013865074,0.000009592688,0.00007173989,0.000099189114,0.0000030924186,0.000035506506,0.0022677705,0.00028268466,0.00012887787,0.8240905,0.172987,0.000010184637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066138166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008696199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011657476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005964698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009111902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049123228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100959722","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00045.x","title":"Yielding Actuality: Trust and Reason in Gillian Rose's Vision of Community","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Rationality; Epistemology; Friendship; Alterity; Sociology; Impossibility; Conviction; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.041607044259080996,"score_gpt":0.3280487834047635,"score_spread":0.2864417391456825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100959722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16408974,0.0071318867,0.031410787,0.3007475,0.00083885586,0.000082175626,0.000052279105,0.00011873702,0.49552792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99222904,0.00039263887,0.0012353058,0.0017645967,0.00007837873,0.000018796889,0.000004007795,0.000017792361,0.0042594075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911404,0.00650476,0.00014560942,0.00060051034,0.0009689098,0.00063992245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951338,0.003039267,0.00037764834,0.00046414256,0.00053686916,0.00044820388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008836702,0.00037019877,0.0004396497,0.0014198432,0.00982183,0.011395147,0.0016051786,0.0051936605,0.0021019003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010092544,0.0002744047,0.0004510085,0.0008216563,0.077297606,0.01180265,0.0070316675,0.0058191153,0.0002495847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000910798,0.000004321583,0.00006855969,0.000012514138,0.0000018642105,0.00008415512,0.031365417,0.00016103288,0.000041699037,0.9656645,0.0014343412,0.0011524162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021275991,0.000018245657,0.00020633545,0.00008856225,0.000008800191,0.00015852985,0.030961698,0.00070305716,0.00015927559,0.87149334,0.096150406,0.000030454368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02015839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019862873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02015839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011557245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004485107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08385414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104601679","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00088.x","title":"The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Wright; Epistemology; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Medicine; Art history","score_opus":0.06441762251572031,"score_gpt":0.26277322146600063,"score_spread":0.19835559895028032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104601679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14032666,0.002934795,0.20220338,0.20018359,0.0035174878,0.00010340315,0.00027718933,0.00091549376,0.44953808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96309406,0.00057743053,0.009987081,0.007558415,0.0006763848,0.00006569634,0.00006254051,0.00013391627,0.017844481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553216,0.00213037,0.00020639767,0.0005581066,0.0011127769,0.0004601445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98685443,0.0067920946,0.00087795616,0.002436412,0.0019442221,0.0010948578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058185887,0.00035510265,0.0008527312,0.0008692945,0.0028697334,0.003953392,0.0016106004,0.0057742293,0.014302395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03397998,0.00038786934,0.00061147107,0.0006925942,0.010215161,0.008999749,0.006801357,0.005984371,0.0013720238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032867774,0.00001827496,0.00024057507,0.000032136046,0.000005167787,0.00021702168,0.00039720145,0.000386366,0.00012721027,0.9868542,0.006569873,0.005119097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001748204,0.0000087837425,0.000108222186,0.000020145611,0.0000028785032,0.00012288633,0.00026434718,0.0009882291,0.00012338317,0.9850043,0.013330487,0.000008677204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009887114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014302395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021754887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028228087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047846317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109235385","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00127.x","title":"Puzzles about Trust","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Access Control and Trust","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Epistemology; Computational trust; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Reputation; Social science","score_opus":0.038166490388517,"score_gpt":0.2782668937827928,"score_spread":0.2401004033942758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109235385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2315555,0.013720576,0.1361722,0.2554874,0.0011003369,0.00009381131,0.00022595949,0.00015379934,0.36149043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402446,0.0011986146,0.0017185751,0.0010605985,0.00015394279,0.000019055746,0.000020242029,0.000012640313,0.0017919554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921538,0.0045946487,0.00041246778,0.00075653644,0.0014264188,0.00065617106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97667503,0.015248581,0.0024261654,0.002951157,0.0017836613,0.0009153603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093884915,0.00037504957,0.00070126925,0.0015874397,0.004027035,0.007578116,0.0009170885,0.004175067,0.004889009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029440865,0.0003242491,0.00054702576,0.0015321268,0.032133393,0.015587751,0.0045523974,0.00507547,0.00044382704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016288557,0.0000048989036,0.00031602717,0.000028971383,0.00000752927,0.00006108462,0.0022780464,0.0005483052,0.0000370837,0.9926179,0.0010970555,0.002986875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071252043,0.000008987298,0.00018265407,0.0000428487,0.000006204445,0.000056976827,0.0010194025,0.0013077604,0.000043324933,0.98882616,0.008491672,0.0000069858443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003778695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014743711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093884915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005116199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024254508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049651682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110946410","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00015.x","title":"Agent Reliabilism, Subjective Justification, and Epistemic Credit","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0411197691073327,"score_gpt":0.23919623394467543,"score_spread":0.19807646483734273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110946410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1745213,0.003747618,0.36996895,0.056803375,0.00051496935,0.00016054095,0.00021054856,0.00030140096,0.39377132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901265,0.0002330429,0.0061654453,0.00056442444,0.00014326758,0.00005430476,0.000022926946,0.000029919833,0.0026602598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915863,0.005265355,0.00033699156,0.00075030595,0.0015474847,0.00051355973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94457954,0.039410822,0.0036112955,0.0057943705,0.0052394676,0.0013644446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014442021,0.00043842744,0.0009314167,0.0021278164,0.001974697,0.0057508624,0.0015618125,0.0046281954,0.005932532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04407338,0.0003786462,0.0006229734,0.0013861748,0.02170278,0.0082728695,0.0042788954,0.004911664,0.00045314315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075400553,0.000009154041,0.00019962952,0.000015796972,0.000005992807,0.000026086092,0.00024062883,0.00058017566,0.000036330763,0.9969657,0.00033734806,0.0015757537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010618264,0.0000042353113,0.0001477142,0.000024032639,0.0000035853755,0.000018697907,0.00006021017,0.0017268792,0.0000685167,0.99573225,0.002197306,0.0000058637834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002281103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020897584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014442021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033102932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024405282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07637763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114070813","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00161.x","title":"Global Care Chains: Freedom, Responsibility, and Solidarity<sup>1</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04088998789279767,"score_gpt":0.31144448963354054,"score_spread":0.27055450174074286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114070813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054262836,0.008201887,0.022872657,0.3264784,0.0014779024,0.000082134,0.00011183227,0.000049598395,0.58646274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721867,0.0021204473,0.0020724942,0.0063137677,0.00056069065,0.000081077684,0.000030510993,0.00002839918,0.016605943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959857,0.0024474526,0.00010308602,0.00029117553,0.00060536107,0.0005672408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359834,0.0044345297,0.00050810527,0.00038885602,0.0005222865,0.0005479507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053881085,0.0003457369,0.00033559912,0.00076164876,0.0046370365,0.010373564,0.00086146605,0.0054761027,0.009395346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008164075,0.00023000989,0.00037351224,0.001387699,0.0360043,0.0100399,0.0050410787,0.0054714642,0.00043772018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003596377,0.0000019929537,0.00007813166,0.0000070158057,9.838063e-7,0.000012065515,0.0012713305,0.000074468895,0.000006307085,0.9956797,0.0016819312,0.0011824556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006224038,0.000005120413,0.0002555149,0.00006192354,0.0000036182512,0.000026551703,0.0031607416,0.00027330627,0.00005858963,0.9678315,0.028310947,0.0000060877255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015257711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016346253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015257711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008971097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010435391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06509018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158332646","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00038.x","title":"How to Collaborate: Procedural Knowledge in the Cooperative Development of Science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Scarcity; Knowledge management; Descriptive knowledge; Naturalism; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.042824520251148926,"score_gpt":0.2420132347140211,"score_spread":0.19918871446287217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158332646","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08217559,0.001325972,0.46283758,0.042403497,0.0003297503,0.0003456106,0.00006744163,0.0002619596,0.41025257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448551,0.00050416996,0.0476896,0.0008612085,0.00008413609,0.00023452184,0.000056411736,0.00007715889,0.005637694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95748323,0.033604536,0.0012177966,0.0020847917,0.0038243276,0.0017853857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93595374,0.040854346,0.0049868203,0.009805362,0.0050560487,0.0033436646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030448416,0.00047356443,0.0006574359,0.002430085,0.007436397,0.0143828355,0.0028618686,0.0056297365,0.005673888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06645766,0.0006734729,0.0010568263,0.0019773382,0.046112344,0.019798063,0.014483168,0.005384764,0.0008516074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018506676,0.000044121745,0.000701045,0.0000817035,0.00001776221,0.00019082065,0.024054768,0.0021404382,0.00034254356,0.9577322,0.0014213901,0.013254822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023923394,0.000026467102,0.00045179113,0.00015478968,0.000013148354,0.0001204005,0.007245464,0.0033473703,0.0004018091,0.954092,0.0340974,0.000025382042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039317827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002680148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042316136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0103516085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16102856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806049702","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12274","title":"The Birth of <i>Being and Time</i>: Heidegger's Pivotal 1921 Reading of Aristotle's <i>On the Soul</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Soul; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Ontology; Key (lock); Fundamental ontology; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.019591509738731305,"score_gpt":0.25552376306344626,"score_spread":0.23593225332471496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806049702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067097634,0.030739339,0.018873433,0.055564243,0.0026317239,0.000039877,0.000081141654,0.000086791166,0.82488585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293625,0.003880241,0.0018827253,0.003480155,0.00058361277,0.000030730527,0.00002408706,0.00006423154,0.06069168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893934,0.0007078748,0.000017021177,0.00011605447,0.00013626301,0.00008354062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992964,0.00040893245,0.00005766575,0.00005086971,0.000105981846,0.000080048136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019773676,0.00034052916,0.00028672995,0.0009841247,0.00304104,0.004738325,0.0004753087,0.0015395128,0.0025238022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015386128,0.00022156443,0.00019011198,0.00049337826,0.023734253,0.004169421,0.0016580587,0.0035505383,0.0004379124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010628197,0.000005119658,0.00004664408,0.0000104706405,0.0000010313877,0.000026101032,0.008687879,0.000048639322,0.000106268446,0.9860805,0.0033467247,0.0016298483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017694358,0.000037834747,0.0008270447,0.00021121495,0.00000530607,0.00009833268,0.0078112166,0.0003245934,0.0004040919,0.7079986,0.28224602,0.000018041781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062065516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004696103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062065516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052093803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001614405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037796915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366683289","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12510","title":"Raging better: Reflections on the Myisha Cherry's <i>The Case for Rage</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rage (emotion); Typology; Argument (complex analysis); Anger; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14637272239167584,"score_gpt":0.3781314620560827,"score_spread":0.23175873966440688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366683289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09229838,0.012422887,0.004407693,0.7681354,0.006374439,0.000052397016,0.000033636195,0.0001092534,0.11616593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87078184,0.0032278681,0.0013976722,0.08529487,0.0022957427,0.00008357455,0.000010071324,0.00025684337,0.036651578],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883223,0.008505727,0.00012639459,0.0007301218,0.0010742688,0.001241165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887649,0.008420344,0.0005826417,0.00039783466,0.000842375,0.0009919363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010578786,0.0007304943,0.0010524938,0.001004047,0.022625277,0.013554637,0.0021530595,0.01226574,0.004537286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017127296,0.0006509883,0.0006573554,0.0007090313,0.051078428,0.010221971,0.011256777,0.028542472,0.0009733847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042495954,0.000060554485,0.00024646136,0.000092867784,0.0000111135405,0.0013261928,0.5587476,0.000104891915,0.00055605057,0.3514464,0.082118176,0.0052472176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001896463,0.000053652133,0.0004695985,0.00042772337,0.000010436173,0.0009560556,0.4554554,0.00031026272,0.00047878272,0.06638775,0.47537974,0.000051636922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005521179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008090124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022625277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008320254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033122841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380356787","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12522","title":"Expressing and receiving negative emotions: Comments on Myisha Cherry's <i>The Case for Rage</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rage (emotion); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.09392404286219735,"score_gpt":0.3515936713885609,"score_spread":0.25766962852636355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380356787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061795842,0.005741445,0.0023062997,0.8202748,0.026481759,0.00006425265,0.00006205401,0.00009808923,0.08317559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6655428,0.004339629,0.0012725347,0.23931906,0.019089663,0.00016348234,0.000039995655,0.0003340387,0.06989893],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928046,0.00520979,0.0001327216,0.00035535268,0.0010118022,0.00048577876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98198235,0.014454839,0.000829068,0.00029616355,0.0016023525,0.000835243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006991768,0.0008065819,0.0008784534,0.0005962708,0.011685122,0.007979429,0.0019232606,0.01254918,0.0029706836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020573404,0.00041367896,0.0007090623,0.0005013747,0.022837134,0.005692772,0.0042493036,0.027863655,0.0007075004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017897949,0.00008491571,0.00083250186,0.0002503719,0.000032069798,0.0051577366,0.46926904,0.00029837695,0.0020757716,0.17245439,0.34102356,0.008342304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030854135,0.00013693156,0.0019618995,0.0005856103,0.0000212535,0.0018525526,0.44761544,0.0005604579,0.0008700822,0.01762171,0.5286393,0.00010386126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00583058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069922414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01254918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005023428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015409845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036976457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388133135","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12545","title":"Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Existentialism; Naturalism; Ontology; Rationality; Parallels; GRASP; Analytic philosophy; Character (mathematics); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08482429848669673,"score_gpt":0.29481864546611003,"score_spread":0.2099943469794133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388133135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07986833,0.011499002,0.12431008,0.07966087,0.00072099216,0.00010802786,0.00012887681,0.00011714599,0.70358664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685702,0.001611291,0.0112306485,0.002282782,0.00025118262,0.000092821814,0.000023196515,0.000029929648,0.015908081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961158,0.0025474585,0.00010208568,0.0002800547,0.0006840417,0.00027043963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782383,0.0012982662,0.00016715263,0.00025285356,0.000271249,0.00018674575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005174558,0.00038370895,0.00053742004,0.0015012065,0.0040883883,0.0047208867,0.0008655644,0.0033287532,0.001732096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034531758,0.0002650551,0.00041923547,0.00094985624,0.043998748,0.0059560924,0.0029569915,0.0035176321,0.0002677206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.387538e-7,0.0000019686518,0.000011550982,0.0000031340026,4.1674787e-7,0.0000045550005,0.00046959208,0.000075158765,0.0000099181325,0.9988059,0.00026800414,0.0003489063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024662024,0.0000019662543,0.000030402161,0.000011708129,7.310828e-7,0.000007984744,0.00018156946,0.00022301266,0.000017697437,0.99282503,0.0066953106,0.0000020704147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063776085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005076156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008740503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008740503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005482339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06341708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394692283","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12554","title":"The concept of unlivability: A reading of Frantz Fanon's “The North African Syndrome” (1952)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Colonialism; Reading (process); Resistance (ecology); Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Gender studies; Anthropology; History; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0324209632371599,"score_gpt":0.2918188526448891,"score_spread":0.25939788940772923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394692283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13125761,0.106394164,0.009920036,0.37677488,0.008309759,0.00009669307,0.00010800993,0.00007040624,0.3670684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623488,0.00990531,0.0015683728,0.013155146,0.0013011702,0.00009368634,0.000017873412,0.000021111788,0.011588513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983897,0.0010945443,0.000036396435,0.00011775162,0.00020779787,0.00015380232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876934,0.0008606989,0.00011709646,0.00004544848,0.00010323778,0.00010417199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024223698,0.0005668703,0.000364483,0.0021721448,0.0061161285,0.0026122883,0.00083350984,0.003361834,0.0015639985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004658454,0.00019916851,0.0001861015,0.0008123557,0.048131287,0.0065712305,0.002614241,0.0043757544,0.00011145544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020869213,0.000015977268,0.00067032187,0.00007034325,0.0000032937146,0.0015160128,0.13710797,0.00009586646,0.0002174622,0.8319117,0.017267393,0.011102817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001784164,0.000044492434,0.0032046528,0.0010680873,0.000009018365,0.0048836567,0.096517175,0.00028243512,0.0002590258,0.35029912,0.543367,0.00004746074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018253453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01616943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018253453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006550305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026669584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04752606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395075826","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12568","title":"The young Leibniz's tentative acceptance of physical occasionalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04036566334219853,"score_gpt":0.25991667061199303,"score_spread":0.21955100726979448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395075826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16991197,0.023494804,0.035086688,0.14802758,0.0031683652,0.000034742967,0.00010186723,0.00016926469,0.62000465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827559,0.0019371522,0.0012571501,0.0025836087,0.0007212764,0.00001386244,0.000010063388,0.000031658325,0.010689257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806875,0.0009592626,0.00007122826,0.00029594958,0.0004368682,0.00016795323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969175,0.002132355,0.00021717645,0.0002290972,0.0003576721,0.00014627443],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049761585,0.00023193395,0.0002654962,0.0013501485,0.0029379143,0.0047878134,0.000718774,0.0024750484,0.0017492924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073461602,0.00020288034,0.00024555274,0.0006471099,0.031507544,0.0052288985,0.0029162797,0.0033707288,0.0002944104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054960956,0.0000014863742,0.00008305725,0.000008140453,0.0000010501684,0.00003101058,0.0020990574,0.000042736643,0.000046072568,0.995385,0.0009550893,0.0013417822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010552154,0.000016528233,0.00056873675,0.00011699083,0.0000058906253,0.0001244366,0.0024519279,0.00046437205,0.0002916711,0.8612029,0.13472852,0.000017504439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040084044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025719798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036067152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001806086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026316702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396614204","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12560","title":"Touching the wounds of colonial duration: Fanon's anticolonial critical phenomenology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Colonialism; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.040803107973577335,"score_gpt":0.34300753440253273,"score_spread":0.3022044264289554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396614204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5335816,0.009289595,0.016628118,0.03950057,0.001087042,0.00014156899,0.00007694514,0.000094374926,0.39960012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99095356,0.00055596064,0.0006210191,0.0011250969,0.00006112718,0.000030176547,0.0000065232803,0.000019691124,0.006626864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963096,0.002794332,0.00005264521,0.00023942332,0.00028932453,0.0003146581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949773,0.0039026046,0.00028149146,0.00019499514,0.00033379724,0.00030986423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046264385,0.0005572612,0.00036044003,0.0014821592,0.010463609,0.0083064055,0.000994323,0.0029085143,0.0031530634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008100057,0.00024180111,0.00020773806,0.0010230697,0.05061288,0.010378838,0.004033085,0.0037730597,0.00014048601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036864443,0.000019326819,0.0007455141,0.000066539076,0.0000023663176,0.00054659223,0.64576215,0.00010013956,0.00030751838,0.34336975,0.0037959716,0.005247327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018316443,0.00007538321,0.0024938458,0.00092794676,0.00000857123,0.0014417603,0.61076313,0.00081202335,0.00060019427,0.11059126,0.27220035,0.000067225854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016468091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015201458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016468091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008676642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023859777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06295377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400546234","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12582","title":"Thoughts on the structure of the history of Africana philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.046482331154765286,"score_gpt":0.25614837344161145,"score_spread":0.20966604228684615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400546234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09060873,0.08209046,0.004978893,0.24714288,0.0070755095,0.000042496784,0.00016331983,0.00007049901,0.5678272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340856,0.012744394,0.0010655781,0.0066948906,0.0021461346,0.000049190276,0.00003784101,0.000059969494,0.04311643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977653,0.0014824988,0.000048314243,0.00015612219,0.0002690836,0.0002787793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731463,0.001892971,0.00020244722,0.00013464535,0.000257014,0.00019819822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004652784,0.00026877454,0.00028626312,0.0030526652,0.010206327,0.0101330085,0.0006076851,0.0019252708,0.0074806903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061101685,0.00027508996,0.00017564288,0.00245862,0.022016734,0.009071461,0.004149005,0.006537611,0.0003526065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015865111,0.0000067858223,0.00014680577,0.000040795236,0.0000018242607,0.000100852914,0.025972685,0.000060903323,0.00008623561,0.9607994,0.0073900153,0.0053778016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013845241,0.000024039158,0.0014841853,0.0007738437,0.0000049694495,0.0001647083,0.032963235,0.00022301913,0.00030256552,0.24297902,0.72104806,0.000018583589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007002174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007128205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01042241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01042241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039831894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075620234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401549937","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12586","title":"Preparing the particular: Kant on the imagination's role in judgment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Imagination; Psychology","score_opus":0.032848372017029684,"score_gpt":0.24699547904191083,"score_spread":0.21414710702488116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401549937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09750488,0.018013755,0.04306322,0.20149592,0.0011995777,0.000041182604,0.000078194535,0.00013367466,0.6384696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862766,0.0018331151,0.0022747617,0.0034264969,0.00029689752,0.0000129267955,0.000009578806,0.000032904656,0.0058366666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378645,0.0047727316,0.00012707956,0.0002820217,0.0006145527,0.00041719354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99232775,0.005876782,0.0003053414,0.00046868515,0.0006121373,0.00040924968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006877382,0.00033897668,0.0003416328,0.0011705969,0.0034007293,0.008273241,0.00067777216,0.0030389891,0.0026407735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008880009,0.00026854762,0.0003273411,0.0007746794,0.03946762,0.008263642,0.003856413,0.0062109027,0.00054704316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014999478,0.0000063012662,0.00009366471,0.000023972594,0.0000034151026,0.000073404706,0.0062142187,0.00024878196,0.00010001565,0.9875886,0.002652272,0.0029802911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008161809,0.0000058791456,0.00014558113,0.000062746534,0.0000035310768,0.000034096487,0.002701117,0.0002764502,0.00014743449,0.97791517,0.01868914,0.000010768165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023388024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001978788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008273241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003270639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024022062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03637147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406098040","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12612","title":"A common measure: Hobbes on the epistemic functions of public reason","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Sovereignty; Epistemology; Politics; Measure (data warehouse); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08143138602242155,"score_gpt":0.2541070526870265,"score_spread":0.17267566666460493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406098040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027538411,0.010341002,0.23467074,0.073685244,0.0015327858,0.000083946994,0.00011407552,0.00013451742,0.6518992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588231,0.0018819958,0.018366285,0.003464466,0.0010980448,0.00015755549,0.000042765878,0.00011017874,0.016055547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874681,0.008767893,0.0003819913,0.0011013795,0.0016891959,0.00059137656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689157,0.0087160915,0.0005604055,0.0018112345,0.0014616841,0.00055912486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014265261,0.00068487227,0.0010675637,0.003196929,0.0061289966,0.010759259,0.0011416108,0.004841569,0.0044765878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017989116,0.0005089714,0.0010974753,0.0019792232,0.055792313,0.015548933,0.0067422017,0.0067407587,0.0010099708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018839129,0.000001617564,0.0000072121748,0.0000030363592,0.0000010164159,0.0000052334954,0.00025315597,0.000055166372,0.000008251949,0.9990276,0.00027269323,0.00036306778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029355076,0.0000020862967,0.000012681882,0.000015863545,0.0000013559824,0.0000052580604,0.00011030717,0.00013478575,0.000020271758,0.99603504,0.0036564828,0.0000028307873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024273575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014404764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014265261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072914795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026584892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07544279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}