{"meta":{"query_hash":"b9093663625f","filters":{"venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review"},"cohort_total":23,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":23,"exported":23,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b9093663625f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Transnational+Human+Rights+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2178195001","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1001","title":"International Human Rights Fact-finding Praxis in its Living Forms: A TWAIL Perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Human rights; Salience (neuroscience); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Public relations; Psychology","score_opus":0.02577428534812014,"score_gpt":0.32630597994136723,"score_spread":0.3005316945932471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178195001","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005552722,0.1305319,0.060405895,0.43960539,0.004990508,0.00012215137,0.0001539977,0.000104878025,0.35853258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6878606,0.10222335,0.027056893,0.12437892,0.012013129,0.0004801131,0.00022659286,0.00024332922,0.04551701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97766155,0.01443719,0.0010649048,0.0018899621,0.0039732787,0.00097312935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94897974,0.040997423,0.0023897125,0.0038764917,0.0030215294,0.0007351628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043638505,0.0006033772,0.000992423,0.004430443,0.005622814,0.022322414,0.0033457424,0.012234474,0.005837484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051254712,0.00042704237,0.0006690131,0.0063284417,0.059608337,0.024542514,0.006586642,0.017435296,0.0011359315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023821906,0.0000028015686,0.000048806458,0.000080243335,0.0000032092466,0.000019458763,0.0013049651,0.00013340381,0.000016038812,0.98840696,0.004698121,0.005283562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004157641,0.00001981416,0.00029445338,0.0016908656,0.000009717169,0.00012969354,0.0036388428,0.000789818,0.00015280003,0.6724225,0.32082447,0.0000228631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005773293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052315984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043638505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009534438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00835233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23078525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288275913","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1013","title":"Indigenous Rights Before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights : A Call for a Pro Individual Interpretation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Political science; International law; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Reservation of rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.05650578190975631,"score_gpt":0.3599535535068404,"score_spread":0.3034477715970841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288275913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011876755,0.10515364,0.0127636045,0.6353868,0.009279448,0.000078748846,0.000058584716,0.00006313421,0.2253393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4870337,0.05533192,0.01832873,0.38590094,0.013750575,0.00041411872,0.00007894427,0.000112507696,0.03904848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9650881,0.017487314,0.0015967984,0.0027379305,0.010393257,0.0026965833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698547,0.022774799,0.0011201331,0.0009875107,0.0042208047,0.001042147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03581133,0.00042274495,0.0011933356,0.002092453,0.008906037,0.014180869,0.003554319,0.016887847,0.0023440677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02715429,0.00049264915,0.001031592,0.0029560754,0.036551896,0.01551004,0.0059325257,0.036364682,0.00038146295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000241651,0.000008926122,0.000064219865,0.000057058114,0.0000035151763,0.000058469228,0.0028727585,0.00004158178,0.000043405827,0.9818611,0.008880655,0.0061059245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018833576,0.000043276574,0.0009574514,0.0015908148,0.000027431193,0.00016982193,0.00608682,0.0002792943,0.00024366267,0.47655183,0.51397705,0.000053641023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043340992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06646818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043340992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010589486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029798904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18939072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292436634","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1018","title":"African Lessons for Post-2015 Global Right to Development Conceptualization and Practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10941805667882604,"score_gpt":0.42216247012375346,"score_spread":0.3127444134449274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292436634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011235888,0.07989229,0.0028839735,0.7566764,0.0064264904,0.000060772178,0.00012272163,0.000032642245,0.14266883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6984631,0.04941621,0.0062867566,0.18439636,0.0032898795,0.00038240067,0.00018659262,0.00014945072,0.057429183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98365027,0.009813456,0.0005993224,0.0008803447,0.002020494,0.0030361323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809869,0.014450973,0.0006186926,0.00082395045,0.0019276087,0.0011918636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04603166,0.0005683286,0.00087171694,0.0021182115,0.006728762,0.015368126,0.0017871514,0.009401405,0.012279919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03396237,0.00037509087,0.00062466675,0.0026802884,0.019274242,0.017178673,0.009271946,0.013092628,0.0006657052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020757929,0.000017619395,0.00013020125,0.000245536,0.000005632319,0.000080360674,0.0062071513,0.00008334874,0.0000942739,0.9467739,0.028110225,0.018230928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029543899,0.000026226518,0.0013330908,0.0032466727,0.000014884848,0.000101852944,0.012552955,0.00014009938,0.00027695083,0.2752924,0.7069542,0.00003125992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031903308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032558445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04603166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014074832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03384293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24344164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753971949","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1065","title":"Assessing Universalism and The Rhetoric of Development Assistance in Human Rights Research: Canadian-Ghanaian Human Rights Engagements","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Universalism; Cultural relativism; Rhetoric; Transformative learning; Political science; Environmental ethics; International human rights law; Sociology; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; Relativism; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.15730178134937164,"score_gpt":0.4210525454827544,"score_spread":0.2637507641333827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753971949","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16434656,0.3935629,0.0038145566,0.21998994,0.0016086823,0.00016189393,0.00020687874,0.00004048456,0.21626797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9182872,0.066806376,0.0017988663,0.0050947783,0.00013832832,0.00005993534,0.00003685438,0.000026078942,0.007751562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833536,0.010066068,0.0005684395,0.00090659683,0.0029234956,0.0021818012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532301,0.03392512,0.0019776383,0.00085041026,0.0083317375,0.001684884],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031057589,0.00043691043,0.00070471485,0.0039285105,0.010974121,0.01254052,0.0015412449,0.003135812,0.004038791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03414885,0.00023041134,0.00019822917,0.0087615615,0.022672825,0.0048939763,0.0056230295,0.0029324105,0.00014543995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087001674,0.000031052095,0.0058893827,0.0027849204,0.000042207976,0.0008531993,0.28782904,0.0003309729,0.00082682446,0.55590665,0.018093199,0.12732555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003296976,0.000049061182,0.014036198,0.008534393,0.00010050737,0.00039330308,0.24184482,0.00036831977,0.0011857859,0.036414288,0.6969643,0.00007603318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86370164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93324447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09345513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1487186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67806756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754378547","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1075","title":"Human Rights Discourses in Nigeria Across Time: Trajectory, Successes and Potentials for Canadian-Nigerian Engagement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Political science; Politics; Law; Documentation; Jurisprudence; Public administration","score_opus":0.036229459803270636,"score_gpt":0.37909422465246945,"score_spread":0.3428647648491988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754378547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5259432,0.18334821,0.0004409223,0.07967329,0.0010490891,0.00010511346,0.00023854464,0.000014894502,0.20918676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473716,0.041955784,0.00027116967,0.0020012138,0.000060989296,0.000025230167,0.00005479233,0.000008822135,0.008250391],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568105,0.0010242912,0.00013330189,0.0003080567,0.0012339903,0.0016193825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926334,0.002620898,0.0007152502,0.00012785009,0.0026575888,0.0012449999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006571714,0.00027788413,0.00050541613,0.003352915,0.017980315,0.01294746,0.0010645879,0.0022101789,0.0031253286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008917425,0.00020814966,0.00019545224,0.007352631,0.009721716,0.0039558546,0.00408582,0.0030425668,0.00015531004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008796324,0.000071671806,0.01841602,0.0012843095,0.000030409374,0.0014573738,0.57987446,0.0001541314,0.0006143363,0.25840533,0.014887645,0.12471638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001072892,0.000030533112,0.04695064,0.0032616197,0.00004116892,0.00042528362,0.64305365,0.00011537282,0.00038692873,0.005005129,0.30065614,0.000062826264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91148865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9663807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08851135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07007425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15165408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50842667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754503488","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1070","title":"Canada-Ghana Engagements in the Mining Sector: Protecting Human Rights or Business as Usual?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Corporate social responsibility; Multinational corporation; Profitability index; Duty; Business; Duty to protect; Social responsibility; Economic growth; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.07385773945982392,"score_gpt":0.2958857275347266,"score_spread":0.22202798807490265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754503488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23170194,0.12598608,0.0010656036,0.2791478,0.0010267878,0.00013429279,0.00064122304,0.000033493598,0.36026278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065874,0.042450227,0.0009027561,0.019475253,0.00011282036,0.000023881279,0.0001353989,0.000017381442,0.03029484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634665,0.0005164722,0.000085197,0.00023611524,0.0013836971,0.00143185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504244,0.0013495103,0.0005282568,0.00012659056,0.0017172616,0.0012359591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024847868,0.00020944489,0.0003254349,0.0013145342,0.007640373,0.005851006,0.001139166,0.0024912367,0.005796096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068939785,0.00013626354,0.00018794986,0.004568733,0.008851759,0.0024306283,0.0020029778,0.002267567,0.0002669786],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072632676,0.00007294839,0.027174618,0.0013262188,0.00003236284,0.0018352959,0.04784515,0.0003000011,0.0008924566,0.6570897,0.097389765,0.16596891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022220682,0.000034559995,0.054439735,0.002565478,0.000045790406,0.0005325351,0.09118051,0.00022279302,0.0005960198,0.013376547,0.83693177,0.00005203197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9757603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06113488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06113488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13101336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44356662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754635665","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1071","title":"Canadian-Zambian Human Rights Engagements: A Critical Assessment of the Literature and Research Agenda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Refugee; Economic growth; Independence (probability theory); Law","score_opus":0.11900321658098438,"score_gpt":0.47058380806746836,"score_spread":0.35158059148648396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754635665","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006885096,0.8700251,0.00025284,0.10434387,0.0014705339,0.00006320638,0.00019957391,0.000008743831,0.016751073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13967219,0.8411695,0.0010667489,0.014234554,0.0005768366,0.00013126573,0.00018637202,0.00001792918,0.0029446243],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98779964,0.0037024328,0.00067754404,0.0009033266,0.0037935511,0.0031234038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9556973,0.024066035,0.0018839694,0.00057502225,0.015023281,0.002754511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028353732,0.00107475,0.0018521927,0.015843442,0.017551696,0.016778558,0.0034982886,0.004959322,0.005470276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03872031,0.0006647998,0.0008720601,0.030365571,0.011582194,0.0072487774,0.006377026,0.006053065,0.00033309008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014585248,0.00008442783,0.008120674,0.032340858,0.0002872711,0.001210135,0.12829559,0.0004402398,0.00047833702,0.30256948,0.13207933,0.39394772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020170823,0.00003635044,0.015853904,0.053027947,0.0002885244,0.00035554048,0.14366609,0.00019103939,0.00025773363,0.009143605,0.7770642,0.000094904186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9352313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97422147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13953295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13953295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37111253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754649929","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1069","title":"Towards Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in Nigeria: A Role for Canadian-Nigerian Cooperation?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Constitution; Cultural rights; Right to property; Rights of Nature; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.042474395487613524,"score_gpt":0.35986416961186535,"score_spread":0.31738977412425184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754649929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0796748,0.20072801,0.0026156865,0.2816931,0.0022355441,0.00009177004,0.00010723859,0.000020850262,0.432833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8727837,0.09611609,0.0025235002,0.011812844,0.00028744628,0.000027770657,0.000054491597,0.000012687371,0.01638145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452704,0.0014025003,0.00023734549,0.00039838627,0.0016680091,0.0017667052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162865,0.0030783413,0.0006012624,0.00029182015,0.003558557,0.0008415075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007051395,0.00030524356,0.00050226133,0.0023922499,0.011103678,0.0120200105,0.0010166484,0.003432955,0.0024124265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01007548,0.00022085113,0.00024437837,0.003749681,0.017640851,0.0050823996,0.002493775,0.004533725,0.00010936521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013348389,0.000011198698,0.0018473782,0.0004147292,0.0000076021292,0.00034859547,0.011706262,0.00021499163,0.00017573565,0.93831944,0.008498775,0.038441926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013513932,0.00002707669,0.014528003,0.0052228686,0.000053978616,0.0006143992,0.06579657,0.0005458407,0.0006718308,0.1241571,0.78827333,0.00009541491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87336355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9218352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12663645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051430468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14175655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3731559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754700054","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1073","title":"In Search of Accountability: A Critical (If Preliminary) Assessment of the Literature on Canadian-Nigerian Engagements on the Immunities of State Officials for Human Rights Violations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Mandate; State (computer science); Accountability; Limelight; Treaty; International human rights law; Public administration","score_opus":0.07551594570600124,"score_gpt":0.42685651315353296,"score_spread":0.3513405674475317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754700054","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023986334,0.77761066,0.00042089375,0.1338714,0.002037911,0.000067263085,0.00013817701,0.000005231652,0.061862085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45115685,0.5176461,0.0005796072,0.025037754,0.0013499612,0.000075978736,0.000071291135,0.000016137283,0.0040663197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879915,0.0052986075,0.0007417083,0.00083642005,0.0031259086,0.002005793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9329696,0.047695793,0.0034997202,0.0007355041,0.013789953,0.0013093827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021816611,0.00067037187,0.0009325391,0.009846699,0.010781852,0.011341876,0.0018105212,0.0040860474,0.0035232261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05055826,0.0004192003,0.00042136735,0.016609175,0.012835567,0.0063523795,0.0026605295,0.0045456584,0.00028956833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015679606,0.00007991773,0.013926619,0.015788209,0.00014992736,0.0013215488,0.13693988,0.00025500986,0.00061504217,0.50776625,0.06303332,0.25996745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002527162,0.000078871795,0.03049052,0.0509411,0.00026736624,0.0006469631,0.17630084,0.00016118305,0.00060094043,0.016676616,0.7237257,0.0000846417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60153556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8336634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39846444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043746404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12641606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80162215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755209705","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1066","title":"Canada-Botswana Human Rights Engagements: A Critical Assessment of the Literature and a Research Agenda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sustainability; Sociology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.10623607245805676,"score_gpt":0.48209665959894377,"score_spread":0.375860587140887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755209705","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031070076,0.603452,0.0010633301,0.3163506,0.0021957217,0.0002529943,0.0004236384,0.000021002235,0.045170672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45174992,0.505614,0.0027576191,0.03278221,0.0007569998,0.00039732497,0.0002704159,0.00003821651,0.005633346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97820103,0.008009302,0.0010396715,0.0018095837,0.0066192206,0.0043211933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9018164,0.07013998,0.0037824383,0.0010820212,0.01966182,0.0035173723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03586605,0.0009553423,0.001517919,0.015809137,0.024618376,0.022233414,0.0039472156,0.0059866174,0.0044946484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05605174,0.00069428794,0.0007756781,0.034118954,0.020365728,0.011453799,0.007040542,0.0073227617,0.00026851127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009426001,0.00008153767,0.010259184,0.01953159,0.00017223162,0.001995181,0.21057467,0.0004946719,0.0004360661,0.42555422,0.06726121,0.2635453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015980582,0.00002907943,0.013367816,0.053092018,0.00016158175,0.0005333859,0.38654783,0.00033037513,0.00029195263,0.020642053,0.5248875,0.000100442885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8877238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9538018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1656339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1656339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3434439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9677464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755604978","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1074","title":"Evaluating Canadian and South African Collaborative Human Rights Initiatives: A Preliminary Analysis and Research Agenda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Human rights; Law; Political science; Charter; Parliament; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Government (linguistics); International human rights law; Population; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.17343914074143107,"score_gpt":0.4854186976573275,"score_spread":0.3119795569158964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755604978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4828754,0.118568435,0.0017582771,0.03664512,0.00043292964,0.004342081,0.0042783585,0.00005823916,0.35104117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92699474,0.045117315,0.0058351015,0.0039002404,0.00008077221,0.0011502297,0.0015669641,0.000024163102,0.015330445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803423,0.0059103877,0.0006218193,0.0007612432,0.007861743,0.0045025027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94232595,0.016206572,0.0022251776,0.0007416552,0.034390643,0.0041100476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026741141,0.0008131841,0.0010140926,0.008888486,0.012802048,0.010955051,0.002454953,0.0016648204,0.0065017836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048092786,0.00035671907,0.00060242845,0.023378864,0.0028876418,0.0031092952,0.0031144547,0.0016150529,0.00034342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013541664,0.0011636902,0.16033673,0.012163352,0.00067860715,0.00089679705,0.082652844,0.002138701,0.0012376135,0.21382463,0.054503042,0.46905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000335314,0.00082154595,0.2935122,0.009816826,0.001226079,0.00029277036,0.2976321,0.0018192582,0.002200377,0.0064763436,0.38566777,0.00019946802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9828872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99314815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17589614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17589614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3190282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9558437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756088165","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1067","title":"Canadian-Tanzanian Human Rights Engagements: A Critical Assessment of the Literature and a Research Agenda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Tanzania; International human rights law; Rights of Nature; Right to property; Law; Linguistic rights; Political science; Human rights education; Fundamental rights; Constitution; Bill of rights; Reservation of rights; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.10883145825892698,"score_gpt":0.3905784568041324,"score_spread":0.2817469985452054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756088165","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015282976,0.80589896,0.00020261106,0.13048635,0.0015300261,0.000038115624,0.00012676779,0.000009668585,0.04642453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27804774,0.6965138,0.00064773444,0.017028753,0.0008610393,0.00007830374,0.00011278609,0.000019437379,0.006690457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525934,0.0014985066,0.00022685058,0.0003931344,0.0013192733,0.0013028282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98438144,0.008232712,0.0010942316,0.00024373195,0.004440552,0.0016073383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014059649,0.00064288796,0.00092033425,0.009660353,0.015097864,0.012386835,0.0020583656,0.0037003113,0.006118282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017667513,0.00046754724,0.00035581767,0.027446141,0.012487353,0.005984734,0.0041337935,0.004327917,0.0003149666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008631272,0.000086346394,0.005277047,0.01154167,0.00005692575,0.0014775346,0.17537105,0.0001982283,0.00029529806,0.47003835,0.0884052,0.247166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011287066,0.00003127609,0.012981915,0.0219368,0.00006259727,0.0003590446,0.16078441,0.00009466185,0.00013527728,0.0074453307,0.7961118,0.000045571196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8304623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92213106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16953772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09622021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2096972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6981298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756308975","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1068","title":"Women’s Health Rights in Canadian-Anglophone African Human Rights Engagements: Normativity, Indigeneity and the Spaces Beyond the Norm Life Cycle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Government of Canada; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Normative; Right to health; Environmental ethics; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.03380385322817762,"score_gpt":0.32960949094976116,"score_spread":0.2958056377215835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756308975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6802745,0.005462031,0.0034183026,0.07631923,0.00037903452,0.00016668018,0.0001426023,0.000034679764,0.23380297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908766,0.0007686557,0.00061439665,0.0016804152,0.000016445909,0.000026430364,0.000017108901,0.00001315502,0.00598673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863549,0.004617383,0.00020964534,0.0007741489,0.0032109937,0.0048330254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873188,0.0058434694,0.00076907227,0.00046198562,0.0024579985,0.0031487457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012095603,0.00046142592,0.0005694588,0.002253594,0.051204156,0.013648694,0.0021756275,0.0030402606,0.003939602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016115714,0.0003871667,0.00033905005,0.0028050041,0.05030911,0.0037871285,0.009788719,0.0052946624,0.00014155394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035239875,0.000024892102,0.006093136,0.000077918085,0.000009867863,0.0004947014,0.845935,0.000117861346,0.00040342842,0.12608428,0.003467861,0.017255824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007567911,0.000017199283,0.009104761,0.00028459512,0.000012956131,0.00017141584,0.8841128,0.00021782597,0.0002881779,0.011519731,0.09418496,0.0000779941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9809638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98872656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120740175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120740175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2121307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8760354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756415109","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1072","title":"Canadian-Anglophone African Human Rights Engagement: A Critical Assessment of the Literature on Health Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Human rights; Political science; Sustainability; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.034589592326671616,"score_gpt":0.3863432729829478,"score_spread":0.35175368065627616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756415109","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007931851,0.7122,0.0005514145,0.21601197,0.0026053411,0.00007784754,0.0000721738,0.000010739349,0.060538635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2763361,0.66228914,0.001507945,0.05065581,0.0012505561,0.00017412186,0.00008530195,0.000033891058,0.007667156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783481,0.00896317,0.0009025638,0.0011159772,0.0068026544,0.0038674322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415112,0.041363996,0.0014762838,0.0007236693,0.012095937,0.0028289326],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03804921,0.0009659542,0.0014406637,0.009088519,0.023168601,0.017026672,0.0034290499,0.0075558536,0.004372565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039902464,0.00049138145,0.00062382396,0.015573694,0.024942815,0.008402721,0.006533051,0.009665651,0.00028949103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060368,0.000047098023,0.0016366104,0.007933892,0.000084525935,0.0010994474,0.16426367,0.00020792476,0.0002577163,0.560883,0.10438807,0.15913776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015250623,0.000025667789,0.0036585776,0.02149558,0.0000925805,0.00033859987,0.13189659,0.00009811995,0.00022034292,0.018780176,0.8233065,0.00007209524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85480964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92534584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11611826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30625162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84250087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942848434","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1086","title":"Sovereignty and Canadian-Nigerian Human Rights Engagements: Some Theoretical Reflections","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Human rights; Power (physics); Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Popular sovereignty; Law; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Law and economics; Political economy","score_opus":0.03865991025708563,"score_gpt":0.35197166543502506,"score_spread":0.3133117551779394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942848434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16501723,0.08703483,0.002461692,0.1450246,0.0007050233,0.00009178004,0.00013663636,0.000017869932,0.59951025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483501,0.028550223,0.00086315355,0.003859645,0.00008977615,0.000044460176,0.000037395686,0.000013439588,0.018191755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995447,0.0016701794,0.000113496615,0.0003544881,0.0009116605,0.0015031766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946743,0.0035164854,0.00031421444,0.00011184702,0.0009317381,0.00045136956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006642129,0.0004673866,0.00054749753,0.0030888724,0.022148354,0.0128844725,0.0012998891,0.003619014,0.004864148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059212684,0.00031289313,0.00030672492,0.006662623,0.026561158,0.00596933,0.005464123,0.005187166,0.00015222073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007242897,0.000011417216,0.0008463688,0.00013823641,0.0000025680883,0.00034797136,0.12636164,0.0001386691,0.00006224817,0.86100394,0.003001004,0.008078761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105392655,0.000015710157,0.0055765645,0.0025525468,0.00001815023,0.00035530547,0.53881836,0.00053205324,0.00023957495,0.07435299,0.37747428,0.000053859527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9454572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10141902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10141902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08602833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7358499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947970535","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1063","title":"Canadian-African Human Rights Engagements –A Literature Review and an Agenda for Future Research: An Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1225808138693515,"score_gpt":0.4369947523708944,"score_spread":0.3144139385015429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947970535","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013625554,0.95390433,0.00033018983,0.031043544,0.0017061946,0.0000792318,0.00054652424,0.000013081835,0.011014277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024635546,0.95960116,0.0019613542,0.008926651,0.0008609198,0.00016379438,0.00042054983,0.000019448233,0.0034104865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936824,0.0014595411,0.00068199204,0.00046263382,0.002521457,0.0011920327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787916,0.010844451,0.001302274,0.00025406154,0.007860772,0.0009467742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0128755355,0.0016346361,0.0023914431,0.026506064,0.009020203,0.015176179,0.0026492418,0.0038148689,0.011413814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023152672,0.00071265246,0.0013554159,0.065150775,0.006454842,0.0093148025,0.0050090123,0.0035799094,0.0006631419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018068502,0.00015957757,0.005886868,0.07046775,0.0002924017,0.0006521428,0.015920732,0.0005680328,0.000960478,0.18648453,0.23433663,0.48409012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002330899,0.000044810808,0.013197952,0.07121978,0.00032680633,0.00026274158,0.02159809,0.00020511648,0.00029719502,0.009923605,0.8827801,0.00012054991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8717792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9569263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1282208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07479281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2204502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5426624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948927674","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1083","title":"Deprivation of Nationality as a Counter-Terrorism Tool: a Comparative Analysis of Canadian and Dutch Legislation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationality; Counter terrorism; Legislation; Political science; Terrorism; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Immigration","score_opus":0.1036170585763439,"score_gpt":0.383845943151202,"score_spread":0.2802288845748581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948927674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71501034,0.15395166,0.0005634884,0.015196577,0.00030756503,0.00012181968,0.002637068,0.0000144367095,0.11219707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565328,0.036937717,0.00025912235,0.0010956179,0.000029891415,0.000023509434,0.0007581051,0.00001906872,0.004344215],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475765,0.00084332353,0.00017106692,0.00029688317,0.002561923,0.0013691729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99034005,0.0024268697,0.002013824,0.00023910624,0.0041440665,0.00083606684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004139207,0.0002104833,0.0005073591,0.0035211174,0.0028881773,0.00394527,0.0011313467,0.0006671441,0.004081796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013207493,0.00015134815,0.0004914461,0.012591432,0.0026577106,0.0013150665,0.0011810642,0.0010030259,0.00017350576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078633387,0.00023681307,0.33051127,0.0057071927,0.0012149893,0.0011102228,0.09054759,0.0014488765,0.0011909248,0.16631396,0.06602288,0.33490902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038661896,0.00007799103,0.77165467,0.0035499698,0.0005517457,0.00017234903,0.05675506,0.0003018883,0.00041912802,0.0010047801,0.16539884,0.000074814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97804445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99040306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054371167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054371167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0858016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39449227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032640545","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1094","title":"Implementing UNDRIP in Canada: Any Role for Corporations?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Declaration; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Political science; Human rights; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Public relations; State (computer science); Sample (material); Public administration; Business; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.06722681399333716,"score_gpt":0.32505462742636015,"score_spread":0.25782781343302297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032640545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06651139,0.11039906,0.002544559,0.49791986,0.0033787498,0.00024705345,0.001402699,0.00013984842,0.31745684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7139821,0.08116992,0.0065503456,0.09799992,0.00048618138,0.00014282968,0.0008449167,0.00017546068,0.098648354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98913145,0.0013848753,0.00025672704,0.0006442464,0.0044751246,0.004107547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868803,0.0019354412,0.00048063477,0.00043263793,0.007884639,0.0023864594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007795175,0.00033573512,0.00047382695,0.0013344074,0.01058555,0.010049503,0.0026655875,0.0033172986,0.0053874794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014344889,0.0002539924,0.00057148974,0.00256853,0.006966061,0.0028105981,0.002505106,0.004714837,0.00043225387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007351201,0.00009220445,0.011827897,0.0021241384,0.000102303864,0.0008299193,0.019666832,0.0013244807,0.0010720439,0.53068435,0.24452119,0.18768112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018998626,0.000028476232,0.020865323,0.0018312074,0.000063763815,0.00010696399,0.018011006,0.00038211182,0.0007631759,0.007170937,0.9506819,0.00007621907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11456612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11456612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4447933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8312392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129217487","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1064","title":"Background: Towards a Critical Assessment of Canadian-Nigerian Bilateral Relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); International relations; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.08603613697390834,"score_gpt":0.41720202096765074,"score_spread":0.3311658839937424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129217487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03566357,0.28229994,0.007890543,0.33216283,0.0056581274,0.00042519727,0.0009870396,0.00008051382,0.33483234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75924945,0.16715227,0.012469549,0.03373075,0.0019680315,0.00036996222,0.00051613565,0.00006416891,0.024479654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894343,0.0031331002,0.00044178823,0.0009584626,0.004007856,0.0020244457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971162,0.015423387,0.0014721409,0.0006842817,0.009583922,0.0016742056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015255016,0.000883926,0.00056885235,0.009693085,0.01927935,0.015770677,0.0017654066,0.003775625,0.0056426334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025959589,0.00030064417,0.0003719876,0.012626619,0.020295547,0.005119147,0.0044126515,0.005979332,0.00026633387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025682733,0.000012593768,0.0020047876,0.0016904493,0.000013064548,0.00035051734,0.048688807,0.00043446035,0.00029199946,0.84095216,0.05974169,0.045793742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058000255,0.000011766785,0.004699209,0.009130563,0.000029662375,0.00026413822,0.077083185,0.00029476022,0.00034112888,0.062435236,0.845654,0.000050401228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86142826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91369396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13857174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11473535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22160478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83246714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511820","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1093","title":"International Accountability in the Implementation of the Right to Development and the “Wonderful Artificiality” of Law: An African Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Right to development; Transformative learning; Artificiality; Political science; Human rights; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06436027505756274,"score_gpt":0.38695234525815453,"score_spread":0.3225920702005918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511820","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014271787,0.33452466,0.009661417,0.35991082,0.003619276,0.00005391473,0.000054921562,0.000023678196,0.2778795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6925745,0.23181927,0.0046158987,0.044882245,0.0038470945,0.00012355001,0.00005021834,0.000054597076,0.022032682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98199904,0.01184239,0.0005469086,0.00095428305,0.0021416727,0.0025156834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98490727,0.011422268,0.0012250197,0.00046738624,0.0014672863,0.00051068567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02113928,0.0005001878,0.0006286977,0.0028860716,0.0039635277,0.009563318,0.0009547348,0.0053582466,0.0026919907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016826658,0.00025280664,0.0006390857,0.0029640896,0.01771517,0.011260104,0.0044670883,0.008615654,0.0002524184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000587774,0.00000974052,0.00019996746,0.00021738143,0.0000050037056,0.00006431313,0.0018165559,0.00015035116,0.0000584759,0.9818393,0.0039333035,0.011699799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010725063,0.00005321561,0.0024633333,0.005675119,0.00003432105,0.00023393732,0.0062890886,0.00053738867,0.00054354256,0.3783047,0.6058249,0.000029713186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010624832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008017245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02113928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00684185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013845719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11179656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396917687","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1104","title":"Taking ‘Third World’ Lives Seriously: Decolonising Global Health Governance to Promote Health Capabilities in the Global South","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Global health; Corporate governance; Global governance; Political science; Business; Health care","score_opus":0.043528752443577796,"score_gpt":0.37128079022151633,"score_spread":0.32775203777793854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396917687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0733174,0.0053059505,0.029321214,0.450908,0.0015823587,0.00014084163,0.000027744996,0.00015241446,0.43924403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92017215,0.0022767952,0.0054415045,0.05232676,0.00031484783,0.00017244638,0.000021485412,0.00012658605,0.019147344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98968863,0.0070594493,0.00023961987,0.00072310714,0.00097136147,0.0013178943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913794,0.0044264006,0.00076711184,0.0015341446,0.00071969983,0.00117329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018270418,0.00045163985,0.00041005563,0.0009187891,0.007128198,0.010777056,0.0011791111,0.004566458,0.0040094764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117575135,0.0003132692,0.000653002,0.0006946473,0.05673797,0.012336031,0.017266104,0.010490368,0.00055576646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009560706,0.000016765309,0.00054797606,0.000056114328,0.000004976631,0.00013288308,0.035889458,0.00027850692,0.00029524846,0.9486138,0.004503552,0.009651183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027101833,0.000057753427,0.0009973403,0.00056452677,0.000013903782,0.00017468157,0.029869396,0.00057642907,0.00083107565,0.704905,0.26195306,0.000029787945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008074669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01180296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018270418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008156588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020544967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096624374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W647303043","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1002","title":"The Right to Food and the Political Economy of Third World States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Right to food; Context (archaeology); Politics; Third world; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Food prices; Food systems; Development economics; Political economy; Economics; Geography; Agriculture; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.02407982847185957,"score_gpt":0.30259596824512436,"score_spread":0.2785161397732648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W647303043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044421062,0.11127144,0.0041481103,0.114888385,0.00065001874,0.000022429462,0.000061450424,0.000018817958,0.72451836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398172,0.035895538,0.0007521971,0.007917835,0.0004441649,0.00004750232,0.000040269508,0.000018077331,0.015067233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640673,0.0022785212,0.00006561408,0.00018244133,0.0003665412,0.00070014555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973699,0.0017737224,0.00030202317,0.00016970426,0.00020272235,0.00018190294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052366653,0.00022233049,0.00032480786,0.0011241384,0.0031363573,0.006827291,0.0005661724,0.0027344949,0.0041309246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042947726,0.000120626864,0.00036754156,0.0016895495,0.021419918,0.005360069,0.0038074302,0.0030542936,0.0002544556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002322304,0.0000033854935,0.00019896028,0.000029309918,0.0000021947371,0.000029059593,0.0010091348,0.00010070103,0.000016784079,0.9920054,0.0013373219,0.005265336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006717437,0.000013930911,0.0023164002,0.00088146044,0.0000059057434,0.00012683387,0.0055926433,0.00026322878,0.00013671219,0.67015797,0.3204851,0.000013093272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009127763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008991107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009127763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041451785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004260771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03007549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W916266699","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1000","title":"Balancing, Proportionality, and Human Rights Adjudication in Comparative Context: Lessons for Nigeria","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Reservation of rights; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.07421079593648132,"score_gpt":0.3946551032844333,"score_spread":0.320444307347952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W916266699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07335968,0.18776345,0.048109755,0.122067966,0.0026312226,0.00026261498,0.000065768676,0.000041180938,0.56569827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9199538,0.035023604,0.020808455,0.0052391896,0.0009425698,0.00023658437,0.000020731959,0.000049795795,0.017725276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747121,0.02069026,0.00087100937,0.001066489,0.0016966375,0.0009634559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96092874,0.03232242,0.0017848145,0.0015049797,0.0031607898,0.00029821726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043923058,0.0003608504,0.00085099414,0.0030236319,0.005366357,0.009882748,0.0012558935,0.0033734222,0.0056863436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050039317,0.000357475,0.00033327178,0.0041439347,0.026338272,0.015128071,0.003496924,0.0041672573,0.00026723582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011319633,0.000008316152,0.0003745096,0.00010823424,0.0000029083371,0.00007501637,0.0022209275,0.00013006887,0.000031569805,0.9779056,0.0009074069,0.018224064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033439534,0.00007310639,0.003767655,0.0026033998,0.000025467687,0.00030909147,0.017343676,0.001177458,0.0005265609,0.8133923,0.16070464,0.000043232107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016791614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029265396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043923058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009936006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008679608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23229015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}