{"meta":{"query_hash":"521c00147f91","filters":{"venue":"The University of Chicago Law Review"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/521c00147f91","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+University+of+Chicago+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1000343132","doi":"","title":"James Madison Has Left the Building","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Chicago Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Nullification; Law; Legislation; Political science; Statutory law; State (computer science); Democracy; Judicial review; Constitution; Legislature; Sovereignty; Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.02876443821679884,"score_gpt":0.2704875496667374,"score_spread":0.24172311144993855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1000343132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014279865,0.050474685,0.001267016,0.21437559,0.03164971,0.000056572782,0.00045411816,0.0004159797,0.6998784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006454697,0.009708558,0.0005492968,0.02354535,0.0019567737,0.00002239224,0.00010485823,0.00010065737,0.95755744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834,0.00022755927,0.000063052714,0.00038573428,0.00075631693,0.00022728469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974955,0.00048299038,0.00010186699,0.00019955014,0.0007271949,0.0009929201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013200251,0.00056427094,0.0004632061,0.0011397977,0.004460771,0.005416848,0.0007696603,0.004014766,0.19618611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047055646,0.0003813559,0.00031595185,0.0006819353,0.0015042159,0.0020684386,0.0021111148,0.004244974,0.0913435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018125307,0.000018534392,0.00031695425,0.000048752558,0.0000049132373,0.00010472256,0.00009789846,0.000025409992,0.00015357266,0.022417651,0.9076737,0.0691198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.016684e-7,0.0000024865822,0.000109654015,0.000032125154,0.0000010099286,0.000025472706,0.000025681209,0.0000065502913,0.00003819186,0.0005517503,0.99920386,0.0000023487278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020842373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059273515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19618611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030664008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062102377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65630794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W350415636","doi":"10.2307/20141859","title":"The Luck of the Draw: Using Random Case Assignment to Investigate Attorney Ability","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Chicago Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public defender; Defense attorney; Luck; Natural experiment; Plea; Right to counsel; Law; Legal ethics; Psychology; Political science; Supreme court; Criminal justice; Statistics","score_opus":0.03840572026592548,"score_gpt":0.2230084178892135,"score_spread":0.18460269762328801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W350415636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65396875,0.0006883365,0.32054737,0.0015111183,0.00037962978,0.0077475314,0.0010330456,0.00033353848,0.013790676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380394,0.00007402788,0.052257095,0.0010419588,0.00013304714,0.0060330266,0.00048522238,0.00007615463,0.0018599286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8031019,0.17101239,0.004568497,0.009598441,0.009884521,0.0018343297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57022065,0.33104667,0.03774765,0.050732695,0.0075900275,0.0026623616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12719753,0.000742804,0.0011533068,0.0022725358,0.0016544107,0.00268897,0.003181198,0.0021399895,0.005197513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37943313,0.0007459004,0.0012154382,0.0020885018,0.0050167493,0.004189292,0.003451581,0.0027188938,0.0011140339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010184141,0.003969161,0.7130673,0.0006266986,0.0022444236,0.0006558735,0.00872324,0.02234263,0.002003243,0.08699661,0.0057308967,0.14345586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034322725,0.015633851,0.3954774,0.0008281912,0.0016324368,0.0014720084,0.0056469925,0.23373003,0.011112422,0.30448484,0.026024764,0.0005247999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029660407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019377567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12719753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020197674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001620026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6726929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}