{"meta":{"query_hash":"c0b8d6718543","filters":{"venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c0b8d6718543","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+University+of+Queensland+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1850866196","doi":"","title":"Murphy's Law - the Canadian Treatment of Detainees in Afghanistan: Are Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law Obligations Circumvented?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International humanitarian law; Political science; Human rights; Project commissioning; State (computer science); International human rights law; Publishing","score_opus":0.022257961903403147,"score_gpt":0.2610123870801411,"score_spread":0.23875442517673792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850866196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03061812,0.020067018,0.002345855,0.21184821,0.0019421151,0.00016042394,0.0002857873,0.00009925597,0.73263323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73654556,0.01599767,0.0031214226,0.04478055,0.00052205013,0.0001633834,0.00011577202,0.000055167908,0.19869837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939859,0.0008262689,0.00016574148,0.00032144412,0.0027530468,0.0019475787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594253,0.0010657855,0.00036765676,0.0001421854,0.0018758998,0.00060586643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030501366,0.00049571856,0.0005070823,0.0025008055,0.024169521,0.0071483473,0.0025357443,0.005538507,0.0046295226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014884407,0.000363035,0.00043952922,0.004138826,0.019098328,0.0028029587,0.0036624433,0.006058725,0.0004516037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014221224,0.000012276158,0.0013604113,0.00008738549,0.0000056715107,0.00035928356,0.010925272,0.00020181783,0.00014792594,0.9025165,0.065760106,0.018609209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026484504,0.000032676875,0.011910831,0.0007549056,0.000039016933,0.00050013786,0.02215842,0.0005247324,0.0003124844,0.058200765,0.9054027,0.00013680365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98083234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99328387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073785834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073785834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1675609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53535616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208164423","doi":"","title":"Free speech and the issue of academic freedom: Is the Canadian velvet totalitarian disease coming to Australian campuses?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Publishing; Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Higher education","score_opus":0.03498383549313287,"score_gpt":0.26079912007352407,"score_spread":0.22581528458039118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208164423","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.183204,0.0067124325,0.0017899051,0.40735552,0.0010768604,0.00004691298,0.00010520879,0.000051474617,0.39965773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540407,0.0012799363,0.000257835,0.017406212,0.00023909163,0.000017874234,0.000016528536,0.000018660574,0.026723258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859659,0.0032217908,0.0002528394,0.0009200089,0.00463487,0.005004581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98606664,0.0060923155,0.0010269508,0.0008493597,0.002785193,0.0031795525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075797047,0.00040396437,0.0005835053,0.001823097,0.05831798,0.01852269,0.0025313545,0.0095475195,0.005239833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01963672,0.0004360163,0.00054102397,0.0030252507,0.072233655,0.0052818195,0.008061774,0.013055429,0.00041661382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025696078,0.00001707896,0.0023233476,0.000054445412,0.0000080787,0.0005170097,0.1474777,0.0001868689,0.00017228768,0.8098323,0.026041586,0.013343638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030450641,0.000038479124,0.022869205,0.0004034418,0.000040221035,0.00049007573,0.19971807,0.00084232335,0.0004541202,0.12910885,0.6457496,0.00025521542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9627839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96085787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09493796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09706633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6888263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253351770","doi":"","title":"Religious Vilification: Confused Policy, Unsound Principle and Unfortunate Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Hatred; Incitement; Argument (complex analysis); Subject (documents); Legislation; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01690532574155348,"score_gpt":0.2779925484278232,"score_spread":0.26108722268626977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253351770","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011822574,0.0083723515,0.0082494505,0.8381076,0.0021436966,0.000041260035,0.000034908106,0.00010001783,0.13112813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5616537,0.004552925,0.007708293,0.37455425,0.0038809408,0.00019541896,0.00003842474,0.00015120716,0.04726484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829454,0.0075415536,0.0006170676,0.0019205357,0.005268804,0.0017067186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861633,0.008864776,0.0007664058,0.0014734833,0.0018338837,0.0008981306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018020777,0.00042916284,0.00061890745,0.0012661507,0.011513456,0.012245882,0.0038612136,0.027266383,0.0036573245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038855903,0.0005396257,0.0005391458,0.0007227679,0.049090974,0.012442327,0.008390473,0.02310733,0.0010271427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038957924,0.000010989399,0.000093144714,0.000013750696,0.0000017811776,0.0000510742,0.00097540714,0.000055686814,0.000050377454,0.97838897,0.016703673,0.0036512334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003143042,0.000025949428,0.00032737132,0.0003843999,0.000015031302,0.00022674166,0.0031176342,0.00069992343,0.00028968,0.79247534,0.2023672,0.00003926982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012941396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012815807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027266383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008709354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012462346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09530413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594526090","doi":"","title":"Self-governing Codifications of English Criminal Law and Empire: The Queensland and Canadian Examples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal code; Politics; Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Criminal law; Code (set theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.03147503646858546,"score_gpt":0.25830422925128205,"score_spread":0.2268291927826966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594526090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15332629,0.004523283,0.0043548136,0.02039566,0.0002844849,0.00014743829,0.00053956336,0.000070877875,0.81635755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187561,0.0034682485,0.00406937,0.0012209468,0.000062418556,0.00010965762,0.00018072246,0.00008962883,0.07204289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954986,0.0010565013,0.00017578773,0.00024511604,0.0019131332,0.0011109173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951466,0.0016320096,0.00025430403,0.00036288658,0.002287956,0.0003163154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027592161,0.00049556355,0.00043098704,0.0043689795,0.024364758,0.0063236733,0.0018696542,0.002126958,0.0047187363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01111927,0.00038261933,0.00044286708,0.0077964882,0.019950869,0.002525374,0.0034926876,0.0029831452,0.00028465985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001657031,0.000013709197,0.0017604486,0.000069673384,0.000006577964,0.00053465314,0.06142381,0.00058260583,0.00017154377,0.9136412,0.012985804,0.008793375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000340723,0.000026172967,0.023746774,0.00052495557,0.000045993023,0.00084125047,0.076622225,0.0031305782,0.0006089243,0.11736943,0.77686894,0.00018068356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98687965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11192887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11192887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06847829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8121046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080256185","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v39i2.5019","title":"The End of Fiduciary Accountability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Jurisprudence; Fiduciary; Accountability; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Project commissioning; License; Convention; Expression (computer science); Publishing; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.028252859306871145,"score_gpt":0.26001178622238574,"score_spread":0.23175892691551458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080256185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01635495,0.0057345456,0.028043024,0.42350632,0.0024658612,0.00003271421,0.00010781363,0.00022678706,0.52352804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8586959,0.0025255869,0.0073820995,0.070610225,0.003324415,0.00018424982,0.000059487833,0.00026614973,0.056951903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96604484,0.015809316,0.0008125743,0.0046912404,0.0077755977,0.004866397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643887,0.018785205,0.0019055575,0.0071180933,0.0052013877,0.0026009579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02868574,0.0005546554,0.0008814932,0.0015309973,0.01127879,0.016668282,0.0020207565,0.010684702,0.0079606995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05581295,0.0005137339,0.0007683768,0.00089605566,0.04634002,0.016838636,0.009427179,0.019447353,0.0018198625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010033495,0.0000053614845,0.00009695751,0.000009901528,0.0000023082011,0.000025074707,0.0009416392,0.00009563474,0.000034275185,0.98573095,0.008469013,0.004578789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012494731,0.000016437052,0.00029401152,0.00012302808,0.000004655881,0.000039242157,0.0005214778,0.0003709115,0.00013151353,0.8913032,0.107166134,0.000016872287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010728586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062734955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02868574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011082467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012842372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15170646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175260927","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v40i1.5643","title":"Judicial Activism and Constitutional (Mis) Interpretation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Judicial activism; Law; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Judicial review; Doctrine; Political science; Separation of powers; Project commissioning; Politics; Publishing; Sociology; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.016461759099501122,"score_gpt":0.24189701933531674,"score_spread":0.22543526023581562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175260927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17405811,0.0047946326,0.040700886,0.044283435,0.0005770002,0.000057745023,0.000029971496,0.000048784386,0.73544955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933913,0.0003541525,0.0008112404,0.0013448511,0.0002393811,0.000027497115,0.000005320432,0.000015992646,0.0038104204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721584,0.018594803,0.0008511726,0.0021691492,0.004076292,0.0021501144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95732474,0.033723913,0.0035384803,0.002996639,0.0018000347,0.00061620126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017087888,0.00033895893,0.000521967,0.0019765433,0.0070039784,0.010741474,0.0014922594,0.004490437,0.0034237157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030368518,0.00030966284,0.0004283981,0.0013112613,0.05750318,0.007904218,0.008121609,0.008525721,0.00031026953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004817113,0.000005335986,0.00032838556,0.000017184264,0.000002773791,0.00010306449,0.011633732,0.00010182966,0.000099238445,0.98429006,0.00042193176,0.0029917946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014444893,0.00003418964,0.0012377374,0.0002048284,0.000014428784,0.00043005176,0.014006694,0.0008254443,0.0007594529,0.917885,0.06456927,0.000018546158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012415017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016426342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017087888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043362016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029192332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090370476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200075973","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v40i3.6125","title":"First Nations Peoples, Climate Change, Human Rights and Legal Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Climate change; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Right to property","score_opus":0.016288602219491456,"score_gpt":0.24418155858878832,"score_spread":0.22789295636929685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200075973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029282743,0.06399663,0.0021718433,0.21051651,0.0012439667,0.000037530917,0.00006353194,0.00003236997,0.6926549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90030664,0.025050543,0.0015052189,0.02251536,0.0008321068,0.00008756063,0.000041754058,0.000022193608,0.049638636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966588,0.0019309752,0.00005786035,0.00021286598,0.00052832766,0.00061113323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967925,0.001930332,0.0004457725,0.0001283319,0.00023139763,0.00047173654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033146003,0.00027243423,0.00032773113,0.001409012,0.007817945,0.006313661,0.00063464965,0.005274069,0.0083178235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041966466,0.00016269933,0.00021721404,0.0019387411,0.03058721,0.00463536,0.0042646653,0.0048533394,0.0003672048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025591446,0.000014432531,0.00059591513,0.000043572745,0.0000019203042,0.0001284216,0.008166751,0.000098660246,0.000034366272,0.9786028,0.0073321606,0.0049783755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078599005,0.00002905135,0.0048569664,0.0007306118,0.00000636147,0.00042507058,0.02030632,0.00017108345,0.00010145537,0.47006878,0.5032691,0.000027313037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031216078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041590326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031216078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006984081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009084908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06206876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320024411","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v41i3.6255","title":"Native Title Rights to Take Resources","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislation; Indigenous rights; Resource (disambiguation); Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Project commissioning; Law; Publishing; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.006929900087722718,"score_gpt":0.16574217882993675,"score_spread":0.15881227874221404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320024411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055148777,0.0011022006,0.009522041,0.008903312,0.0004987216,0.00010916464,0.00014037458,0.00007684627,0.9244985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74602765,0.0008255382,0.003833711,0.009861002,0.00046977276,0.00028323775,0.00011373641,0.00006361188,0.23852178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358773,0.0012762389,0.00052603503,0.0011418071,0.0021522169,0.00131589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993254,0.003170116,0.0005252146,0.0010825543,0.0014684765,0.0004996261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070843096,0.0002817817,0.00045857206,0.00070713204,0.0050034807,0.0051089716,0.0013258883,0.0054196953,0.0074271383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0096186595,0.00048757053,0.0005158242,0.0005203283,0.013025656,0.0042741173,0.005449094,0.0052892333,0.0014117245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001337661,0.00002347648,0.0010000558,0.000033981127,0.0000060677794,0.0002896622,0.008967752,0.00009858268,0.0008130086,0.9790941,0.0041536223,0.0055062873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058364418,0.00018226997,0.0066107684,0.00064013386,0.00004529501,0.0013008688,0.006357608,0.0009783411,0.0024905608,0.3203034,0.6609206,0.00011167534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018961757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02500179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018961757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002578741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061633145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0377028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386594152","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v42i2.7355","title":"Open Justice, Closed Courts and the Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Economic Justice; Political science; Witness; Secrecy; National security; Context (archaeology); Duty; Sociology","score_opus":0.027561262579000694,"score_gpt":0.2819553095403632,"score_spread":0.2543940469613625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386594152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044994432,0.015716627,0.026554722,0.08564289,0.0009497648,0.00012245263,0.00008467862,0.000061357045,0.82587314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9007804,0.004718255,0.0059374413,0.012185308,0.0008748259,0.00022520783,0.000049014423,0.00005647657,0.07517315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898481,0.0041162753,0.0003346799,0.001242841,0.0027838345,0.0016742854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99099404,0.0057339505,0.0006574925,0.00093402463,0.0010361506,0.0006442137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008846122,0.00024108036,0.00058235775,0.0015043791,0.011385349,0.012915814,0.001682595,0.007169672,0.0055412706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018974388,0.0004766067,0.00044267566,0.0015052983,0.05864498,0.010053137,0.0071516978,0.009825773,0.00052829226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.802302e-7,0.000002399752,0.000030475576,0.000004903783,5.2794644e-7,0.000018774868,0.0006901785,0.00004338514,0.000009660068,0.99764,0.00064689707,0.00091177353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072198786,0.000009655877,0.0004019819,0.00011132724,0.000003718166,0.000031351887,0.0007189137,0.00024365268,0.00004224522,0.9485355,0.04988381,0.000010689202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045811832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04058058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045811832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013357945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017561633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09691912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400598815","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v43i2.8293","title":"The Territorial Scope of Australia’s Unfair Contract Terms Provisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Project commissioning; Publishing; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.025840957248229327,"score_gpt":0.2995478676164416,"score_spread":0.27370691036821226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400598815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06207668,0.003497232,0.021033376,0.013383586,0.00012633255,0.0001845804,0.00012654561,0.0000420877,0.8995296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464052,0.0017063996,0.0090489155,0.0028703797,0.000110753,0.00034109072,0.00006631781,0.000032462598,0.039418522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98383313,0.0046955114,0.0010164843,0.001565402,0.0067631076,0.0021264404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990594,0.0043103592,0.001154645,0.0011115767,0.0022237399,0.0006055728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008267133,0.0002568499,0.00044324467,0.0014932425,0.006101164,0.0071468647,0.0013799223,0.0035326653,0.0036164273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012493175,0.00083282986,0.00062127376,0.001433696,0.019948658,0.004541565,0.006977401,0.004140135,0.0007228581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029961188,0.0000050394797,0.00032795776,0.000023636705,0.0000029843497,0.00009546855,0.0047046356,0.00018224584,0.00020882818,0.9908112,0.001072285,0.0025627238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027115904,0.00007839463,0.016505051,0.001002532,0.0000669781,0.0010736802,0.01651432,0.002766913,0.0010326428,0.5879949,0.37282905,0.00010837779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06572002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08372636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06572002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007234003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014774819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13067496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409988700","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v44i1.8931","title":"'Employment or Nothing'","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01767939020186646,"score_gpt":0.2672237193635911,"score_spread":0.24954432916172462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409988700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20758353,0.0018542716,0.014186755,0.09257007,0.0018233759,0.00009029425,0.00013667875,0.00006168301,0.6816933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96856326,0.00029378428,0.000525536,0.017409097,0.00043879327,0.00005395695,0.000033858294,0.000014739619,0.012667043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99054915,0.0028716673,0.00046531524,0.0014637738,0.0028055478,0.001844564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848732,0.008463483,0.002292762,0.0015253436,0.0016507123,0.0011945644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008143894,0.00020728892,0.00039975235,0.000480791,0.0042952397,0.00378882,0.0015593315,0.006665982,0.0076444596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027985903,0.00019682304,0.0003800921,0.0004608141,0.019166159,0.0053910273,0.0055394555,0.0050941217,0.0013060103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038763257,0.000036086392,0.0039139595,0.00006631919,0.000007119174,0.00026934763,0.0073091397,0.00007513508,0.0003708395,0.96832925,0.006463409,0.013120622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058220197,0.0004220151,0.025276927,0.0010391565,0.00005336826,0.0018066816,0.037234467,0.0007807839,0.0019883756,0.59211594,0.3391494,0.00007471965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029232816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034262077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008143894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012059647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024808142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04306948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}