{"meta":{"query_hash":"44e27f922d6f","filters":{"venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law"},"cohort_total":49,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":49,"exported":49,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/44e27f922d6f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Theoretical+Inquiries+in+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1623388010","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-104","title":"Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Humanity; Political philosophy; Law and economics; International law; Political science; Popular sovereignty; Power (physics); Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049915315287974174,"score_gpt":0.3507328770423187,"score_spread":0.30081756175434454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623388010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09493637,0.00029166817,0.0019428055,0.0005883651,0.00024436298,0.00013778683,0.000012287045,0.000041622174,0.90180475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834806,0.000057148565,0.0003256671,0.0007089165,0.00018322842,0.0000064293354,0.000002005966,0.000008833401,0.00035973027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.0005782214,0.00027070107,0.00020995455,0.0002911522,0.00047157222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859023,0.0007864654,0.000043019598,0.00021154438,0.000069219466,0.00029953616],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015833344,0.00012058865,0.00030020394,0.000036487174,0.00013210492,0.000024353847,0.0002454315,0.00025103206,0.00083333196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010849594,0.00010155825,0.00004509252,0.0001676237,0.13164875,0.00019095113,0.00013654545,0.00022373661,0.000047331665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009886451,0.000057046498,0.0006314787,0.0000071696095,0.000009703099,0.0000075198386,0.0021438445,0.0000013744562,0.0000017818516,0.9968249,0.00005857201,0.00015771089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039234615,0.0000741269,0.00006239749,0.00002173735,0.00001025893,0.000002335353,0.0023268203,0.000028829003,0.00041719794,0.9921759,0.0043597044,0.0001283669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031620944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006376713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9034117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004061053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010503847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91244006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1644300354","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-110","title":"Sovereignty as Trusteeship and Indigenous Peoples","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Colonialism; Political science; Law; Paternalism; International law; Duty; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028482701137677154,"score_gpt":0.3320846004974409,"score_spread":0.3036018993597637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1644300354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48438784,0.000148187,0.000057823654,0.0006841961,0.00009560987,0.0001133476,0.000004461116,0.000031362804,0.51447713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997924,0.000088565226,0.00011241429,0.0012139179,0.00020766318,0.00000866442,0.0000026013201,0.000009870044,0.00043231095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883497,0.00025823488,0.00013851956,0.00015782187,0.0002626123,0.00034787232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992766,0.00030462854,0.000023500574,0.00013209696,0.000010142614,0.00025306502],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007070578,0.00009462566,0.00014226869,0.000022447774,0.00020699187,0.000066973014,0.00017400335,0.00012717226,0.0011446585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032969937,0.00008427827,0.000022253394,0.00009208731,0.060004856,0.00014765158,0.00010218229,0.00012545136,0.0001374915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034018383,0.000033560882,0.002005598,0.0000043290825,0.0000027420424,0.000006987174,0.05223789,7.58847e-7,0.0000026492953,0.9453512,0.000054307642,0.00026596856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023825832,0.00009302347,0.000097126234,0.000010864774,0.0000056224685,0.0000036069173,0.01646286,0.0000012911672,0.00016853261,0.9726367,0.01015845,0.00012365474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005894957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039787314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5140448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008591922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095917494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963547191","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1139","title":"Functionalism and Political Economy in the Comparative Study of Consumer Insolvency: An Unfinished Story from England and Wales","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Ideology; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economy; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.03833989309812411,"score_gpt":0.3380792953903343,"score_spread":0.2997394022922102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963547191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631681,0.0001094505,0.00013701746,0.0017041147,0.000027073063,0.00026597994,0.000019956979,0.0000084490985,0.03455987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956083,0.0000042597567,0.000048741476,0.00023762273,0.000096751115,0.000034704768,0.000007697574,0.0000030289127,0.0000063609095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988286,0.0005322527,0.0001915738,0.00017006639,0.0001136139,0.00016391894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873966,0.0010238731,0.00003084654,0.00012523378,0.000029679171,0.000050710165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059621094,0.00007229414,0.00016610694,0.000024352377,0.00018729042,0.000053789987,0.0001274532,0.00005604926,0.0000582022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035947745,0.000053250675,0.000010525702,0.00008084851,0.027554626,0.00012442764,0.000046239064,0.00015488357,0.0000012005715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025855958,0.00027667766,0.0148236,0.0000017961097,0.0000045320526,0.0000010427412,0.03240521,0.0000012579906,0.0000043874797,0.95240206,0.00001696839,0.000036634246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060709385,0.00009381032,0.019855265,0.0000056041913,0.000012307218,3.8366386e-7,0.045471255,0.000044418906,0.0000117971595,0.9233368,0.010482456,0.000078777935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002291334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059128185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03639274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021280552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000345775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9750918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965277367","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1258","title":"Comparative Taxation and Legal Theory: The Tax Design Case of the Transplant of General Anti-Avoidance Rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax reform; Tax law; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Indirect tax; Double taxation; Law and economics; Economics; Direct tax","score_opus":0.020004447956183627,"score_gpt":0.2674586854296543,"score_spread":0.24745423747347067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965277367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97446203,0.000051144012,0.016442977,0.0006480311,0.00021050977,0.0002590128,0.00001167021,0.000015187559,0.007899408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990842,0.000003399575,0.00029755235,0.00038656054,0.00016635726,0.000009724526,0.0000030158326,0.000007811944,0.000041400835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992246,0.00012419106,0.00025154432,0.00012624983,0.00014294188,0.00013044522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912256,0.000298795,0.00027448114,0.00020732768,0.00008933325,0.000007485026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082839373,0.00011345021,0.00020807439,0.00003799799,0.00014217968,0.00007687571,0.00020575308,0.00006395877,0.0001520834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017695375,0.000060716233,0.000039952167,0.00016407543,0.019680468,0.00031211332,0.000066395034,0.00022478492,0.00000421911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008851849,0.000039568793,0.00056687975,0.00003394163,0.000010531491,0.000007861857,0.0013532013,0.00006159684,0.0041948906,0.9934731,0.000051586896,0.0001183329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008819159,0.000038952676,0.0038519735,0.0001244688,0.000101725214,0.000079931255,0.0026435743,0.011288785,0.051896688,0.9233466,0.0054334896,0.00031193855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026734915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015212073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07012653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000030210888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011131526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969029342","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1158","title":"Citizenship with a Vengeance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Amnesty; Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Immigration; Argument (complex analysis); Globalization; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.016126527560400006,"score_gpt":0.32293648690307847,"score_spread":0.30680995934267846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969029342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33419922,0.00011456019,0.14669089,0.0011947693,0.0002548926,0.00023954416,0.0000022975312,0.000109714485,0.51719415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979516,0.00002167335,0.0006534724,0.00063631794,0.0003038925,0.000007362216,0.0000037830573,0.000008247805,0.0004136435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891293,0.0001432589,0.00018164022,0.00015327844,0.00029149695,0.00031738603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993567,0.00030150395,0.000033859716,0.00013605814,0.00008400099,0.00008789047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014644313,0.000081862854,0.000113439564,0.000039093553,0.00022295286,0.00005688175,0.00015208889,0.00010085673,0.00057766127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033366992,0.00006270739,0.000023100594,0.00025707964,0.038963787,0.00012881466,0.000012857934,0.00014963353,0.00003466375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084808176,0.000018769037,0.0006874603,0.0000032566936,0.0000029475084,0.000005405932,0.015143553,0.0000010780814,0.000027738372,0.9831481,0.00028886428,0.0005880299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020541008,0.000110119945,0.00024631678,0.00004415276,0.0000055600794,0.0000014132057,0.0047868784,0.000019009949,0.0013579527,0.9770893,0.01599276,0.00014114223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035699843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020773867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6637524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007536664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051220115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9636516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971249996","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1150","title":"The Critical Modernism of Hannah Arendt","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Trilogy; Modernism (music); Successor cardinal; Politics; Metaphysics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Literature; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02380308296743102,"score_gpt":0.3541619359858111,"score_spread":0.3303588530183801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971249996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01171255,0.00040578493,0.03121561,0.042324547,0.00081089337,0.00031402914,0.000039090603,0.00014557112,0.91303194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982294,0.000013648445,0.00029152483,0.00059883954,0.0006220079,0.000023843126,0.0000028131806,0.000019051027,0.0001989057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720925,0.0005877373,0.0004978277,0.00025573964,0.0006342978,0.000815172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963249,0.0029152357,0.000042813714,0.0003805627,0.00015240286,0.00018411649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012072165,0.00015603872,0.00026623343,0.00004502695,0.0005457767,0.000106648935,0.000610769,0.00018501612,0.0003760954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021779435,0.000116413226,0.000109236054,0.00023297084,0.2175635,0.00017653636,0.00015504523,0.00030128172,0.000071927534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037674872,0.00010487868,0.00006892684,0.000010348246,0.0000043055443,0.000007799338,0.0012799819,0.0000064579044,0.000037549933,0.9979587,0.000350254,0.00013309649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001396914,0.00004994824,0.000024547746,0.000028139004,0.000010597774,8.5009464e-7,0.00058814214,0.00011182154,0.0009063502,0.9865496,0.011445592,0.00014471088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002691643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017970314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98651683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079200225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009401259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78456587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984682637","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1255","title":"Tax Transplants and Local Culture: A Comparative Study of the Chinese and Canadian GAAR","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Divergence (linguistics); China; Legal culture; Political science; Ideology; Law; Tax avoidance; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.011092599745191153,"score_gpt":0.26267188891192733,"score_spread":0.25157928916673616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984682637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804928,0.0000269002,0.00011449273,0.0003973029,0.00014064273,0.00021961408,0.000004674036,0.000010643938,0.018592933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925303,0.000001289299,0.0000131924,0.00059340737,0.00009927779,0.000006149646,0.000002111921,0.0000052239266,0.000026312026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999479,0.000022096508,0.00014018052,0.00012507748,0.0001030552,0.00013061355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973863,0.000039730672,0.000044142733,0.00011714217,0.000038660262,0.000021713464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015771597,0.00009908763,0.0001600127,0.000044700355,0.00011397203,0.00008040644,0.00012341746,0.00005203114,0.00015447155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045008786,0.0000577133,0.000013012477,0.00018257122,0.011658029,0.00020414974,0.000052838517,0.00019360585,0.0000046286405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031107924,0.000056134133,0.030280102,0.000018638942,0.0000066251,0.0000025948755,0.0053310473,0.0000017210709,0.00006396079,0.9640666,0.000055855508,0.00008555693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053769285,0.00023233517,0.2680154,0.00018402758,0.00018779207,0.000019350024,0.04211991,0.0054821433,0.0005738796,0.6340767,0.04274437,0.0009871318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01505457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18405229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32998994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003902068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075281077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99150425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985756541","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1181","title":"Comment on David Enoch's Luck Between Morality, Law, and Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Luck; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.054111860622361854,"score_gpt":0.33499492003137904,"score_spread":0.2808830594090172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985756541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50416833,0.00009588692,0.022140767,0.03698308,0.0012376689,0.00069295574,0.00009145747,0.000285364,0.43430448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96881986,0.0000152357015,0.00019974625,0.03066414,0.00023290877,0.0000051800753,0.0000031276536,0.000017574104,0.00004224859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982641,0.00019618555,0.0003312345,0.0004002186,0.00032106688,0.0004872421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978538,0.0015582059,0.000042208478,0.00035244355,0.000015983223,0.0001773624],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008025316,0.00018654314,0.00023969001,0.00004298646,0.00020056295,0.000067183115,0.000324009,0.000110447,0.00018701117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037325922,0.00015113331,0.000035469886,0.00017704938,0.03971325,0.00012807011,0.0002815146,0.0003177654,0.000071054594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073087416,0.00009746937,0.0001688872,0.000032294,0.0000019135068,0.000051539082,0.0004490052,0.0000018142943,0.0013604208,0.9970017,0.00024617987,0.0005156786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005085082,0.0003449403,0.00020647078,0.00006542019,0.000032618314,0.000008886997,0.00013724154,0.000048339793,0.11564137,0.85955316,0.023166625,0.0002864318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001564214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051192183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4646515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037681184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063301563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997782852","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1093","title":"Settlement, Return, and the Supersession Thesis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Settlement (finance); Indigenous; Human settlement; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01548796120428758,"score_gpt":0.3141964076059255,"score_spread":0.2987084464016379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997782852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048603013,0.00027493562,0.00939768,0.056049228,0.00030254197,0.0002956482,0.000025401332,0.000058270205,0.88499326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959922,0.00009885964,0.0002355095,0.003377018,0.00015986864,0.000009922577,0.0000019601187,0.000003960844,0.00012070711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903363,0.00027089522,0.00013343974,0.000111840425,0.00020596955,0.00024424333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991256,0.0006351475,0.000020964215,0.00011507912,0.000028546663,0.00007465769],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082046253,0.000068773974,0.00011863009,0.000013931657,0.00044971326,0.000052102932,0.00015549368,0.00005702214,0.0003667879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036980418,0.000041973246,0.00003077773,0.00010472956,0.2362982,0.000090544665,0.000063834275,0.00012376357,0.000010264545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040653777,0.000013213478,0.00018501616,0.0000019630577,0.0000038764124,0.0000027809679,0.004431141,0.0000016954965,0.0000035354424,0.9951751,0.0000490917,0.00009190406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047952536,0.000014842236,0.000011719801,0.000022432141,0.000010018865,0.0000018745039,0.0056847916,0.0000027243184,0.000072708935,0.9350156,0.058611725,0.000072045455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028947176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000082473045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058649894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019047101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76578015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003235112","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1280","title":"The Efficacy of Regulation as a Function of Psychological Fit: Reexamining the Hard Law/Soft Law Continuum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hard law; Soft law; Law; Compliance (psychology); Perspective (graphical); Function (biology); Incentive; Philosophy of law; Psychology; Social psychology; Comparative law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; International law","score_opus":0.07379689688929711,"score_gpt":0.34910201110018635,"score_spread":0.2753051142108892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003235112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32259986,0.00027136793,0.0023908054,0.0011606594,0.0008126086,0.00049665227,0.000003360035,0.000060681177,0.672204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991361,0.000016566872,0.000043082382,0.00037415547,0.0002546742,0.00001666527,9.162418e-7,0.000008813206,0.00014905081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980733,0.00058202515,0.00048028617,0.00019408709,0.00039293687,0.00027739932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978582,0.0014292074,0.00020445044,0.00028516736,0.00017103527,0.000051928997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024160328,0.000105577536,0.0002421561,0.000014820405,0.0005379921,0.00005296875,0.0004061604,0.00017322939,0.00033230227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010097023,0.00005893622,0.00007556901,0.00026002078,0.069849916,0.00017177216,0.00007606051,0.00019346632,0.000014673051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038777103,0.00008042866,0.00020162035,0.000009915074,0.00001176732,6.9954405e-7,0.010240399,8.414486e-7,0.00012621828,0.98790157,0.000103796425,0.0009349862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032122343,0.00035386585,0.0024504794,0.00008758888,0.000026773292,9.3187606e-7,0.003666084,0.000006151737,0.0009069573,0.9797868,0.012293222,0.000099910256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013388168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010632835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020650978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027669208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93268144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036014529","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1249","title":"An Examination of Convergence and Resistance in Global Tax Reform Trends","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Jurisdiction; Convergence (economics); Tax reform; Political science; Politics; Value-added tax; Political economy; Face value; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.011360619556756161,"score_gpt":0.2585174977168316,"score_spread":0.24715687816007542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036014529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89375854,0.00001583506,0.00092603685,0.0004615557,0.00016357927,0.000051079634,0.0000039057463,0.000023265357,0.10459618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992001,0.0000033214758,0.00033252567,0.00029144128,0.000095360956,0.000005894546,0.000009889525,0.0000052360033,0.00005619564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932534,0.000016392283,0.00023111011,0.00016678839,0.000127008,0.00013338032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996146,0.00002358172,0.00011722889,0.00017058759,0.00006299488,0.000010980754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049067196,0.00008403345,0.00012936494,0.00007629206,0.00003333222,0.000051341,0.0001406547,0.000064107444,0.0003598121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091387315,0.00007513155,0.000011825427,0.000461845,0.008220898,0.00062986556,0.000057371308,0.00011157358,0.0000067936235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000527343,0.00004587476,0.0067358906,0.00003563493,6.834792e-7,0.000002641883,0.0000787336,7.1056684e-7,0.00067642634,0.9895931,0.00001347399,0.002764116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005163711,0.000015721545,0.11198432,0.000050341678,0.0000051862753,6.411231e-7,0.00034321687,0.0014570885,0.00047981838,0.88319933,0.001771581,0.00017636966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050346527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018175829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10639373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021534912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000058118612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99447817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036475377","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-008","title":"Corporate Fiduciary Duties and Prudential Regulation of Financial Institutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Corporation; Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Corporate law; Shareholder; Liability; Law; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.09868123007834605,"score_gpt":0.35699083718970587,"score_spread":0.2583096071113598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036475377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7972743,0.00012557991,0.023202205,0.003960727,0.00039382698,0.00037493586,0.000025007554,0.000063007144,0.17458041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991659,0.00001560291,0.0004404807,0.000113153204,0.00015396638,0.000013080997,0.000005235125,0.0000031928384,0.000089410816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992749,0.000106436004,0.00018517477,0.0001104297,0.00018663258,0.00013640728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995786,0.00007531753,0.000065540815,0.000109630855,0.00008958907,0.0000813043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005920989,0.000053214077,0.000106798405,0.00002931533,0.00018454777,0.00003548235,0.00011631272,0.00008200496,0.00007901354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035303916,0.000049999264,0.000018028231,0.0001887694,0.0385262,0.00019129367,0.00007973522,0.00008064388,0.000007473385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022463884,0.00003373397,0.0004971514,0.0000041798994,0.0000012598354,5.092889e-7,0.004581972,0.000024787843,0.00005549368,0.9944305,0.00015180775,0.0001961804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017865979,0.000025834961,0.00075113296,0.000014731258,0.000006991772,5.5902046e-7,0.00082710234,0.000066855035,0.00042933188,0.98219943,0.015431974,0.00006738336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015211737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027196668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20189157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036720005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022597765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9640904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036875568","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1107","title":"Conflicts of Interest in Publicly-Traded and Closely-Held Corporations: A Comparative and Economic Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Negotiation; Transaction cost; Adjudication; Business; Liability; Law and economics; Database transaction; Economics; Law; Finance; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.09212785268488419,"score_gpt":0.28678276775453043,"score_spread":0.19465491506964624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036875568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886153,0.00013542948,0.0004770456,0.0013877309,0.00003580097,0.00015152813,0.0000078117155,0.000016479098,0.009172894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989388,0.000027036549,0.000088463,0.0007710485,0.00011796197,0.000011756405,0.000018508166,0.0000069972957,0.000019419102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912447,0.000022491553,0.00039293434,0.00023482114,0.000056811445,0.00016849581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947447,0.00013016044,0.0001852742,0.00015561632,0.00003850997,0.000015983213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033235142,0.00013279784,0.00038243862,0.00022342268,0.000037130023,0.00014904348,0.00011680311,0.00006760299,0.0002719907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004004847,0.0001217671,0.000034681936,0.0003975124,0.009686806,0.0008467041,0.00013953469,0.0001236445,0.000014837959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008095555,0.00005417516,0.0343715,0.000025089761,0.000037502257,0.000002213989,0.00037033926,0.000066330744,0.00004704523,0.9646474,0.00006976955,0.00022764673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025345117,0.00007618843,0.035336323,0.00015056787,0.00029193994,0.000003735195,0.0020283337,0.04712613,0.0010163282,0.8963207,0.0144656105,0.00064964406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035125643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007469713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06832674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026003434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000943435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99300826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040638741","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1153","title":"Who Is the Citizen's Other? Considering the Heft of Citizenship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Statelessness; Refugee; Stateless protocol; Political science; Social citizenship; Politics; Sociology; Law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.027314552713529734,"score_gpt":0.33318446980151295,"score_spread":0.3058699170879832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040638741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35009173,0.00032370992,0.045519985,0.013476579,0.0003595303,0.00055974105,0.000012484995,0.00007399756,0.58958226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580884,0.000046524026,0.00009861825,0.0033580048,0.00028814943,0.0000071048894,9.877967e-7,0.000010003489,0.00038178184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984115,0.0003928846,0.00035264422,0.00014511294,0.00038096897,0.00031691376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782157,0.0016504931,0.000084221545,0.00027293907,0.00011894316,0.000051828836],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032935857,0.00010294994,0.00016126368,0.000032119835,0.00045546438,0.000077728655,0.00034789226,0.00011933998,0.0011908406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008891624,0.00005726839,0.00007329182,0.0002631127,0.06081674,0.00008290307,0.000042023064,0.00021312581,0.000016011963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028322536,0.000009673237,0.00054851826,0.0000045490756,0.00000826539,6.861507e-7,0.039613962,0.0000013338041,0.00007931456,0.95813304,0.0011849873,0.00038736913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012290731,0.00003789045,0.00014878063,0.000047455906,0.00001081326,0.00000116349,0.028295606,0.000049534854,0.007002196,0.94194454,0.022241555,0.00009753037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016967976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015215453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6457171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004364603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056347333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042208543","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1127","title":"Facts on the Ground and Reconciliation of Divergent Consumer Insolvency Philosophies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Debt; Debtor; Opposition (politics); Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.03783276758323504,"score_gpt":0.3068127772802049,"score_spread":0.26898000969696984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042208543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8190275,0.00012509138,0.000638446,0.014170752,0.000096473355,0.0002717701,0.000015997652,0.000022641365,0.16563137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935424,0.00008785206,0.000037987113,0.00033803825,0.00009216477,0.000017372966,0.0000024158876,0.0000036362253,0.00006628725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992797,0.0001255904,0.00017307133,0.000110497276,0.00017690782,0.00013424741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926674,0.00048909924,0.000047412777,0.00012649453,0.00004132036,0.000028903823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004547083,0.000058908,0.00009157898,0.000018221079,0.00025519475,0.000033370172,0.00012768424,0.0000545195,0.00023645531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015666358,0.000040358795,0.000022476448,0.000121659665,0.03138897,0.000077991404,0.000049863746,0.00008775972,0.000013088554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010727001,0.00004202134,0.0007067544,0.0000036100957,0.0000025703146,2.2593753e-7,0.0017488998,0.0000028195739,0.000050909446,0.9971671,0.00009106636,0.0001732975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008429482,0.000024206198,0.00096839195,0.000013752218,0.000005433774,1.0580562e-7,0.0007704923,0.000013433813,0.0005143095,0.98581743,0.011731724,0.000056445897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040734495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020671567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18032677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029642988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021158743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043700055","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1291","title":"Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Family law; Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Law reform; Law; Political science; Best interests; Welfare; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07582124601240359,"score_gpt":0.3830031713158916,"score_spread":0.30718192530348803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043700055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4732661,0.00055285584,0.00012975238,0.0034393452,0.00071394973,0.00083458575,0.000020320731,0.00019007717,0.52085304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568135,0.00010541728,0.00042298427,0.0016144387,0.000568016,0.000055506607,0.000007873119,0.000018763272,0.0015256532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706006,0.0005253256,0.00050392025,0.00029816336,0.00052216573,0.0010903538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988705,0.0004453422,0.00007723678,0.00026281294,0.00008297884,0.00026114556],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017892234,0.0002491349,0.00046827554,0.000043254982,0.00043933955,0.00010515965,0.00045939477,0.00031227307,0.0010812421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062885537,0.00017069303,0.000089813984,0.00044364546,0.053158566,0.0005853167,0.00023866046,0.00047083592,0.00025265903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095090625,0.00009051551,0.0022697535,0.000018565903,0.000014500114,0.000010021588,0.03255999,5.3743946e-7,0.0000408064,0.96441275,0.00026166026,0.00022583114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024882893,0.00027362796,0.012779944,0.0006216877,0.00008613568,0.00000407368,0.08613146,0.00001968982,0.0008774667,0.6301211,0.26480165,0.0017948742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007967153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002578902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5224152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008590071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025856483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046776891","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1292","title":"Something Old, Something New? Re-theorizing Patriarchal Relations and Privatization from the Outskirts of Family Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Family law; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.059238919851540256,"score_gpt":0.35029443015572254,"score_spread":0.2910555103041823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046776891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8840249,0.0031468542,0.04399739,0.021182498,0.0011918668,0.0009330229,0.00003500396,0.00017681975,0.045311652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99395895,0.00012048958,0.004285904,0.00084736844,0.00068965513,0.000010454947,0.0000070459905,0.0000147400315,0.000065371074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751264,0.00089298293,0.00042905842,0.0002108763,0.0004955647,0.0004588527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950947,0.004339713,0.00014474094,0.00019446532,0.00009086912,0.00013547047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026523145,0.00015701202,0.00028499507,0.000027819942,0.0010659908,0.000104327184,0.00028110194,0.0002045439,0.00013214802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00308814,0.00010827562,0.00006381207,0.00031976018,0.03566414,0.0006761087,0.00028002122,0.0004012303,0.000011434182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016432969,0.000020195657,0.0063442285,0.000004835316,0.00002093585,2.5981146e-7,0.18510199,0.000007785482,0.0002144812,0.80764884,0.000044805067,0.0005752409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032873917,0.000021341673,0.0022395838,0.00010735185,0.00004878483,1.7005607e-7,0.054458827,0.000047047433,0.00038109045,0.9369991,0.0051677306,0.00020022162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044749416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040799085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13064316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121741985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032820022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96696025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057609726","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1154","title":"The Worth of Citizenship in an Unequal World","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Entitlement (fair division); Politics; Legitimacy; Scrutiny; Sociology; Economic Justice; Obligation; Population; Function (biology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03522674584828078,"score_gpt":0.40109550790755,"score_spread":0.3658687620592692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057609726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57566965,0.000093851246,0.0047694505,0.0051524555,0.0006703311,0.000222849,0.0000025942388,0.00005005359,0.41336876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998804,0.00005442695,0.000088173445,0.0006623305,0.00012065674,0.0000050437657,0.0000011408202,0.0000060717725,0.00025821026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985727,0.00035189666,0.00033406535,0.00011662037,0.0002722555,0.00035244657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977653,0.0018575343,0.00004688093,0.00018002227,0.000059409766,0.00009087966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028416696,0.00006697234,0.00012729707,0.000049663813,0.0002580219,0.000053052387,0.00029080542,0.000084378145,0.00024419968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047139823,0.000049963826,0.00005638295,0.0005238519,0.051435504,0.00008569892,0.00003645724,0.0002725504,0.000011928862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056331726,0.000038741124,0.0038220412,0.0000015424829,0.0000029612813,0.0000033406984,0.015421386,0.0000051173733,0.000015313972,0.97992104,0.00019951553,0.0005126939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015450927,0.000039033777,0.000823098,0.00002791126,0.000002704494,2.1203081e-7,0.02227653,0.000029019391,0.00021049593,0.9699697,0.0063824262,0.000084365565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015246341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008869139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4231343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075606695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043898755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95114595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063592555","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1023","title":"Criminal Theory in the Twentieth Century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Culpability; Public law; Comparative law; Political science; Common law; Normative; Punishment (psychology); Presumption; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.027713424019522738,"score_gpt":0.34247547716345256,"score_spread":0.3147620531439298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063592555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7282083,0.00046537322,0.016738668,0.0028111176,0.00068045146,0.00022232319,0.0000018988684,0.00005442198,0.25081745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973811,0.0005591102,0.000047932408,0.0015976236,0.00025455697,0.000023113476,0.0000023062044,0.0000067493906,0.00012749953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782765,0.00097199413,0.00023610007,0.00019547963,0.0003596884,0.0004090729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987158,0.00090397027,0.00003174898,0.00024797863,0.000043076077,0.000057423196],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024052935,0.00010276673,0.00015472976,0.0000939583,0.00035376515,0.00011728867,0.00045223266,0.000094655195,0.0017283598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004148054,0.00007344499,0.00008549561,0.0007471234,0.033975214,0.00015583617,0.000055232376,0.00029761126,0.000061938954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082164835,0.00012092,0.00050433504,0.000004798459,0.000004613206,0.00004074067,0.06691067,0.000007681663,0.000002967338,0.92343247,0.00006514178,0.008823522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105717365,0.000033945536,0.00009365527,0.000020048792,0.00007839132,0.0000054972525,0.5377977,0.000036361682,0.000007815949,0.4461742,0.015541794,0.000104884486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067008636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025531435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47725824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007228495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004281602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069029812","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1163","title":"(In)Security and Citizenship: Security, Im/migration and Shrinking Citizenship Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Resizing; Political science; Business; Law; Politics; Economic policy","score_opus":0.015787696996087345,"score_gpt":0.3150778134869479,"score_spread":0.29929011649086057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069029812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321366,0.000464862,0.0027128935,0.0020298152,0.0002244133,0.0002855857,0.0000039562387,0.000058825128,0.062083058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983632,0.0003894282,0.00015533215,0.00063432526,0.00033751555,0.000010017642,0.000009154382,0.000011974049,0.000089069326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981019,0.00038480572,0.00040528257,0.00032920085,0.00034269068,0.000436149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885875,0.0006867465,0.000071964605,0.00015227706,0.00008924904,0.0001410169],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003045068,0.00016348284,0.00023675276,0.00013291581,0.00036221783,0.00019642824,0.00013635402,0.00026405658,0.00020476886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079227716,0.00015308284,0.00003309095,0.00029907853,0.025049472,0.00030970885,0.00006382078,0.00030777394,0.0000049342552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062777035,0.0000179104,0.008216169,0.000018181358,0.000004062318,0.000007893869,0.06411674,1.9995049e-7,0.000048043945,0.927026,0.00023893488,0.00024311541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029295523,0.00006166262,0.00089555955,0.000073281924,0.0000083702425,0.0000047088142,0.009338887,0.0001319583,0.00079431845,0.98672146,0.0014851385,0.00019172487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003261403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013576867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066226594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009046658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039663173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9776038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095581877","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1007","title":"Communities of Judgment and Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Epistemology; Human rights; Set (abstract data type); Relation (database); Common sense; Sociology; Law; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04300944005400052,"score_gpt":0.35848443865536544,"score_spread":0.3154749986013649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095581877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4748594,0.000036198115,0.00044366278,0.0024958232,0.00008653075,0.00012221141,0.0000058314804,0.00004098908,0.52190936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921364,0.00001157175,0.00010305983,0.0004226089,0.0001365412,0.000008494024,0.000002986175,0.000007361358,0.00009372716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860275,0.00040389478,0.000260409,0.00010591981,0.0002717879,0.00035522328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990626,0.00047994568,0.00003195135,0.00022681271,0.00005114524,0.00014756678],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006030497,0.00009838419,0.00021699045,0.000058445403,0.00041188876,0.000051582178,0.00034117463,0.00009651862,0.0010120869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006767358,0.00008642981,0.00003289266,0.00014506045,0.14122006,0.00017673365,0.00019587719,0.00017092394,0.000014227658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016939444,0.00008015718,0.0008864015,0.000008916233,0.000005593188,0.0000054995535,0.009414659,4.2545855e-7,0.0000146792,0.98948854,0.000043378503,0.00003480536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017725152,0.000082628045,0.00007332166,0.000042473206,0.0000072343323,9.4685464e-7,0.00208484,0.0000040428704,0.00028387987,0.98543245,0.011706626,0.000104320454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014229107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013218651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5243543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045833596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015058261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119769935","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1027","title":"Harm and Fault in Discrimination Law: The Transition from Intentional to Adverse Effect Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Statute; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Employment discrimination; Liability; Harm; Malice; Political science; Jurisdiction; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02107537109339203,"score_gpt":0.3369209354750022,"score_spread":0.31584556438161016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119769935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8950559,0.000028379036,0.039267622,0.029344507,0.00014231777,0.0006358934,0.000027964688,0.000039140472,0.03545831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858737,0.000031345302,0.00013395738,0.00092168746,0.0001242924,0.000105938234,0.000037917765,0.000006530251,0.00005098756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988664,0.00029077282,0.00019045117,0.00020093558,0.0002374428,0.00021400761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931586,0.00043906822,0.000024766403,0.000117316245,0.000038394235,0.00006461549],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008106411,0.00008626006,0.00010607026,0.00003679001,0.00028749707,0.000071621835,0.0001583975,0.000073896634,0.00015564285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016459126,0.000063410924,0.00003214747,0.0002181285,0.011174127,0.0002771233,0.000050487306,0.00015822599,0.000020795833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062891966,0.000051162817,0.00018285784,0.0000032627254,0.0000023286207,0.0000015252465,0.01886182,0.000028911745,0.000111818794,0.97810537,0.000013748935,0.0025743148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044209362,0.0000657726,0.0038081014,0.00007096591,0.000021816248,7.819426e-7,0.012501931,0.00085138954,0.00027929893,0.97652906,0.005279457,0.00014931856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017019433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059294654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10353148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010265154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014578883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141357239","doi":"10.1515/til-2013-004","title":"The Montreal Protocol Protection of Ozone and Climate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Ozone layer; Greenhouse gas; Kyoto Protocol; Environmental science; Climate change; Environmental protection; Ozone; Treaty; Protocol (science); Natural resource economics; Meteorology; Political science; Geography; Ecology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.009596809917588154,"score_gpt":0.23024073032797623,"score_spread":0.22064392041038808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141357239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89103115,0.00006214422,0.0023310971,0.0012582385,0.00010827291,0.03046428,0.000014713331,0.000060251583,0.07466986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998337,0.00000581987,0.00018079637,0.000040557865,0.000035578887,0.0013720402,0.0000017597274,0.0000016062166,0.000024890149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938416,0.00005303201,0.00017570899,0.000107363325,0.00009387282,0.00018585224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961746,0.00016153477,0.00004117912,0.00011603961,0.000019011284,0.00004476319],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023400885,0.00006899188,0.00009447903,0.0000014529667,0.000116781004,0.00005453283,0.000096602525,0.00004913261,0.0011619419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050552087,0.000039131417,0.000015272035,0.00006636705,0.018293438,0.00012799233,0.00001997061,0.00009818728,0.000021759874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001440977,0.00001558494,0.0069560036,0.000051541097,0.000003927447,0.0000011619313,0.00016497762,0.000028177785,0.00029200772,0.9732346,0.000023616065,0.01908431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010653706,0.0005678183,0.036328845,0.00010728217,0.000010399694,0.000025406214,0.0012025778,0.01117201,0.014610233,0.9331302,0.001454193,0.00032568225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002096225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006761637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10730581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000013478716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061250057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154197270","doi":"10.1515/til-2013-009","title":"Differentiation in the Emerging Climate Regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Climate change; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Developing country; Kyoto Protocol; Convention; Conference of the parties; International community; Montreal Protocol; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Economic growth; Politics; Ecology; Law; Ozone layer","score_opus":0.05232735177005776,"score_gpt":0.2660323475270985,"score_spread":0.21370499575704072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154197270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.887921,0.00026295465,0.0025281927,0.009096505,0.0003692775,0.0003440943,0.000041968462,0.000030559462,0.09940547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973621,0.00024185362,0.00007454393,0.0020586043,0.00011824455,0.00008772568,0.00001857404,0.000015700924,0.000022669366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987461,0.000039594568,0.00053756975,0.00023604171,0.000023253137,0.00041741546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993456,0.00019325559,0.000106838015,0.00031177726,0.000007704977,0.00003480837],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073263753,0.00012183374,0.0002608465,0.00011644379,0.000074268675,0.00012752131,0.00028807158,0.00009375123,0.0020897395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100019606,0.000106993066,0.000054729157,0.00016136025,0.004327069,0.00027825372,0.00009906473,0.00018857766,0.0010634919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008009527,0.000045375476,0.00939541,0.00001589229,0.0000032262794,9.5618e-7,0.0027924066,0.000009918375,0.0000032978935,0.98749804,0.00012266479,0.000104793646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027086004,0.000021596044,0.0044986117,0.000016177733,0.0000014771429,0.0000019504319,0.00075270067,0.003757545,0.000027951628,0.9893296,0.001169877,0.00015167637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010192403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041038587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1094411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063447216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019673842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193824776","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0015","title":"Property’s Sovereignty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0480782264763015,"score_gpt":0.3631084027986167,"score_spread":0.3150301763223152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193824776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040266286,0.00003509527,0.00069820357,0.010088272,0.00037513048,0.00019240013,0.0000024023961,0.00006373705,0.9845181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992478,0.000044423094,0.00013526763,0.00079035736,0.0004156992,0.000013150827,9.0369133e-7,0.000009794297,0.0061123674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987467,0.00016342684,0.00017103054,0.00021195384,0.00028847856,0.00041839347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919623,0.00008252726,0.000049659113,0.00048735124,0.000052602813,0.0001316127],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008617181,0.000103193684,0.00017763265,0.000019729943,0.0013017824,0.00041211752,0.00079236773,0.0001148622,0.003846752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061398087,0.0000547881,0.000047594265,0.000043966153,0.1265187,0.0004665043,0.00018712817,0.00020531744,0.00018504329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041956926,0.00004483559,0.0002568558,0.000004216831,0.000003845997,0.000018685472,0.0018480725,2.5600744e-7,0.000011356545,0.9949409,0.000371926,0.0024571395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002004201,0.00003279166,0.000060353068,0.000024426878,0.0000035609178,6.5811867e-7,0.00018629715,0.00002847433,0.00023416805,0.7583383,0.2407691,0.000121486824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074721925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003389781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056071054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007720986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474951546","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0017","title":"Technological tattletales and constitutional black holes: communications intermediaries and constitutional constraints","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; State (computer science); Constraint (computer-aided design); Business; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.03281549725311105,"score_gpt":0.3141082639295648,"score_spread":0.28129276667645375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474951546","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016376288,0.0002567676,0.9784599,0.008839916,0.00013804593,0.00018657639,0.00008889537,0.00009095432,0.0103013255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978197,0.00070778036,0.00094843743,0.00035456786,0.000078851976,0.000019702478,0.000007353668,0.0000033390156,0.00006025653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986867,0.0002572561,0.00026799826,0.0002495965,0.00022650149,0.00031195092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978078,0.001667431,0.000047101676,0.0002516918,0.00008004694,0.00014592851],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007290178,0.00013270426,0.0002182317,0.000056518613,0.00057566224,0.00009321446,0.000360541,0.00022853696,0.00052321446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001055127,0.00008697145,0.000031263036,0.000106169355,0.9995852,0.0002573536,0.00029460402,0.00018690624,0.000033533273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016721662,0.000055182078,0.0014723628,0.00000563439,0.000013523957,0.00000784887,0.0012552134,6.408729e-8,0.00005939987,0.9953045,0.000079563266,0.0017299633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004855289,0.000029546209,0.0000042795673,0.000101295875,0.000012222114,0.000021564996,0.0022004906,0.0000067998344,0.00009587473,0.9855843,0.01129759,0.00016047935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.3973144e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012312317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99900955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005630765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000161912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5728832},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2509696337","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0022","title":"Technological neutrality: recalibrating copyright in the information age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Normative; Law and economics; Technological change; Net neutrality; Jurisprudence; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; The Internet","score_opus":0.02550113929871186,"score_gpt":0.2383122564895001,"score_spread":0.21281111719078824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509696337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17303914,0.000047091366,0.042529628,0.029490262,0.00039173022,0.00076123147,0.0000032200192,0.00038398552,0.7533537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99112463,0.0000062167264,0.00005084554,0.00853951,0.00019526761,0.0000353161,0.000006482296,0.000008103419,0.000033621367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987968,0.000062659354,0.00041800615,0.00016835293,0.00021824271,0.00033589988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999215,0.0003874622,0.0000649979,0.00028199534,0.000042587195,0.000007971589],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010883464,0.00015349459,0.00018458549,0.00013185889,0.0001157409,0.00034464468,0.00051143294,0.00014332938,0.0034704441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082535174,0.00006570812,0.000046550333,0.00051213783,0.022306688,0.0021866928,0.00022716829,0.00025191673,0.0005442939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070277725,0.000031072428,0.00015849399,0.00001868894,0.0000018833433,0.000010556987,0.00023525392,3.8661062e-7,0.000114228,0.9885009,0.003974345,0.006883907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037293034,0.00002348033,0.000090136324,0.00009364479,0.0000054624916,0.000002539593,0.00040333334,0.0018249991,0.0005800151,0.8938332,0.10259028,0.00017997065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018805787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017087845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8180855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029750092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066862294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513990116","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0019","title":"Taking notice seriously: information delivery and consumer contract formation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Boilerplate text; Obligation; Normative; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.017812689208509157,"score_gpt":0.23763276570735953,"score_spread":0.21982007649885038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513990116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74262565,0.00011759748,0.16987003,0.010565682,0.0009202887,0.00050352793,0.000009584415,0.00029645854,0.07509114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934133,0.000030465113,0.000105643856,0.0062159323,0.00019551876,0.000010510601,0.000011199534,0.000010311387,0.0000070754822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913824,0.000017506844,0.0003123504,0.00010924724,0.00017546435,0.00024716856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992624,0.000256441,0.00015434249,0.00014000821,0.00017363431,0.000013178262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049882365,0.00013168139,0.00015879473,0.00009036685,0.00013873422,0.00027898434,0.00011295915,0.00013447783,0.00038211557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043193973,0.00009037915,0.000022838245,0.0001485078,0.00945319,0.005324535,0.00013977823,0.0001274726,0.0002103269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001023974,0.00001203087,0.0007509816,0.00010835368,0.0000046498344,0.0000021900446,0.00015930575,0.000002843362,0.00012938764,0.9881748,0.00007194135,0.010481121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003218598,0.000025667736,0.0032462422,0.0006416925,0.000078728706,0.000021708101,0.0005700589,0.007003671,0.00076220423,0.8951409,0.088536955,0.0007535664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055188528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028031129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25078765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024245513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000097586335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514070696","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0016","title":"The policy battle over information and digital policy regulation: a canadian perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Public relations; Grassroots; Public policy; Influencer marketing; Legislation; Public interest; Political science; Business; Marketing; Politics","score_opus":0.007625764211486596,"score_gpt":0.3039728308897685,"score_spread":0.2963470666782819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514070696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016209232,0.00005362667,0.004630831,0.15522194,0.00027334152,0.00026327287,0.00003565001,0.00006076497,0.82325137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855,0.000038255283,0.000021734279,0.0007396775,0.00032245778,0.000007855374,0.0000016500971,0.0000034973532,0.00031487196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921817,0.00008913883,0.00014782717,0.00007982032,0.00020591781,0.00025915197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990179,0.00055945246,0.00003529004,0.00012508177,0.00009300506,0.00016929247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035937398,0.00006237633,0.000064432024,0.00010516703,0.00048169674,0.00029705663,0.00013028803,0.00008109038,0.00022100956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031189446,0.00003581747,0.000019445555,0.00023206198,0.03167334,0.0010334535,0.000043994325,0.00005236251,0.000053935706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018418328,0.000002911081,0.00011689096,6.1614367e-7,0.0000017267574,1.8423887e-7,0.009479423,3.2225338e-7,0.000004456433,0.98524195,0.0007335327,0.0043995883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018559115,0.000014693459,0.000533045,0.000018524328,8.841562e-7,6.641206e-7,0.0044049197,0.000020079744,0.000018531342,0.8988806,0.095859654,0.00006281741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024385886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0137054175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98234075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038202095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038117694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517679917","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0023","title":"Intellectual property, antitrust, and the rule of law: between private power and state power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tying; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Private law; Public law; Law; Competition law; Rule of law; Competition (biology); State (computer science); Economics; Power (physics); Politics; Political science; Monopoly; Market economy; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0462665861976401,"score_gpt":0.23636294406863326,"score_spread":0.19009635787099316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517679917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88642603,0.00014743618,0.0045364373,0.0037100147,0.00018828803,0.00046455464,0.000009677267,0.000052659707,0.10446487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758184,0.000040098974,0.00003606289,0.0019153123,0.00009397607,0.000008402116,0.000001862626,0.000024790126,0.00029766292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987881,0.00007046986,0.0003638967,0.00025725563,0.00019833563,0.00032194145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893034,0.0006487543,0.00008026164,0.00022852323,0.00009276856,0.000019332432],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081833126,0.0001942125,0.0003408006,0.00006894727,0.00014574628,0.00013544042,0.00025868136,0.00008366677,0.0010800578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060733146,0.00007838001,0.000043732212,0.00014273888,0.044893216,0.0004789928,0.00057945825,0.0001630439,0.00010148651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071218656,0.00002972593,0.0010745346,0.000049762308,0.00003061094,0.0000029123598,0.0013339376,1.7061302e-7,0.00022717267,0.99522823,0.00019060817,0.001120151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023726984,0.000117197735,0.00030864883,0.00030215678,0.000049465627,0.0000045439206,0.000184424,0.0001266963,0.0037773962,0.955994,0.03641332,0.0003494265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066369525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000397572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11115577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009031822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007476641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737459881","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0013","title":"Property and Sovereignty: How to Tell the Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Politics; Stewardship (theology); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04499553625122221,"score_gpt":0.3274981946011386,"score_spread":0.2825026583499164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737459881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06898467,0.00009714495,0.0029042435,0.1470783,0.00038902552,0.00067463773,0.0000063511175,0.000056263496,0.77980936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933968,0.00006880022,0.00010052421,0.0015633039,0.0002480206,0.000019038813,3.936753e-7,0.0000067239425,0.0045964047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989191,0.00017795574,0.00010050952,0.00021568747,0.00024234178,0.0003443691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991603,0.00018606443,0.000033811863,0.0004366148,0.000042029435,0.00014121864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007262208,0.00010441811,0.00015529133,0.000014319885,0.0013601345,0.0007588347,0.00072692195,0.00007430002,0.0005082479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082061125,0.000041706673,0.000024405399,0.00005178471,0.077764705,0.00021352977,0.00031845656,0.0001812541,0.000023151244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035774472,0.000018507717,0.0004525579,0.0000037526584,0.0000031172278,0.000005104442,0.003776811,5.2277166e-8,0.000044656583,0.98944044,0.00019998774,0.006019234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017436859,0.00008274764,0.0011242322,0.000040821273,0.000006814612,0.0000012956008,0.0005720662,0.000036242993,0.00061875087,0.82705337,0.17012413,0.00016519125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005035402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055613875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92441213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002576023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003952631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785381600","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0009","title":"Class Action Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Compensation (psychology); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Mechanism (biology); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.050430366174970855,"score_gpt":0.40489152223698555,"score_spread":0.35446115606201467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785381600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071962975,0.000012444778,0.035691433,0.010895956,0.00042745555,0.00019016609,0.0000038395406,0.00011973278,0.880696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739933,0.000012922819,0.00035053937,0.001054204,0.00075333746,0.000017042184,0.0000014040534,0.00000642441,0.00040482415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991726,0.00013606937,0.0001276848,0.00014327336,0.00017691539,0.00024343097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952275,0.00015710815,0.000021968972,0.00016935349,0.00005147691,0.000077344484],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053292484,0.000055524397,0.00007738182,0.00001870752,0.0003872103,0.000064104075,0.00020779397,0.000091135094,0.0010980358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015337145,0.000049675593,0.00002676619,0.00020695475,0.08024656,0.00013785424,0.000062195744,0.00011760785,0.00033384835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010986887,0.000027006748,0.000056212168,0.0000014377797,0.0000016807087,4.0076213e-7,0.0029894765,9.2788935e-7,0.000086114036,0.9957721,0.00032055727,0.0007330956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006292995,0.0000240606,0.000029705025,0.0000055684877,0.0000029057746,2.421027e-7,0.0010971298,0.000097877484,0.00081683503,0.72828287,0.2695185,0.00006138809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001378956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002609631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069820104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043230528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801021333","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0005","title":"Schrödinger’s Robot: Privacy in Uncertain States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Doctrine; Intervention (counseling); Internet privacy; Optimism; Computer science; Privacy law; Nothing; Computer security; Psychology; Information privacy; Artificial intelligence; Law; Privacy policy; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036516741908373146,"score_gpt":0.3865891889344925,"score_spread":0.3500724470261194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801021333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6578759,0.00016261768,0.00090896134,0.038673807,0.00075290323,0.00058443914,0.0000061768465,0.000109156936,0.30092606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681413,0.00016852858,0.00038127397,0.0021129493,0.0001397526,0.0000093674225,0.0000039796105,0.00001634737,0.0003536695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979061,0.00047029904,0.00030232678,0.00025771692,0.00043092816,0.000632623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983481,0.0011202553,0.000048414924,0.00023681691,0.000099138975,0.00014728612],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002650639,0.00013250459,0.00027890623,0.00007692734,0.00018701944,0.0002113467,0.00045659958,0.0002724401,0.0013109304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015478622,0.00012332691,0.000053810112,0.000398071,0.040747546,0.00046031334,0.00014606479,0.0005212899,0.00015099469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031459836,0.000058687918,0.0036327327,0.000012447001,0.0000039283655,0.000008483321,0.040071603,0.000061967236,0.000035983066,0.95575523,0.00008051904,0.00024695095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000303917,0.00006639527,0.00016735739,0.000083293155,0.0000025836905,1.7488381e-7,0.009086357,0.00011326244,0.00010962017,0.9829775,0.0069054356,0.0001840953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093373837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005774068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33893824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019334989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017589495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886905957","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0028","title":"Indigenous Peoples, Political Economists and the Tragedy of the Commons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Indigenous; Commons; Politics; Population; Environmental ethics; Natural resource; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.01912896356402754,"score_gpt":0.27922406251644105,"score_spread":0.2600950989524135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886905957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4742329,0.00086592656,0.0002969027,0.01172418,0.00057989976,0.00043657786,0.000014076926,0.000028517725,0.511821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859834,0.000060957613,0.000018173501,0.00083296327,0.0003178444,0.000011612793,2.515585e-7,0.0000054001343,0.00015448783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986053,0.000528806,0.00020819191,0.00011644984,0.0001709854,0.0003702648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982966,0.0013632174,0.000041435742,0.00018062127,0.000047407975,0.000070703994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009878946,0.00008282175,0.00022244395,0.000011545716,0.0008647315,0.00004524868,0.00035476332,0.0000890049,0.00015830008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007776741,0.000046180045,0.000061057304,0.00013549915,0.32591698,0.000044209617,0.00016460787,0.000162878,0.000005946302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028730692,0.000023472901,0.0009716133,0.0000042305187,0.000010396349,3.259479e-7,0.08534272,3.736394e-8,6.7839744e-7,0.9133223,0.00018558718,0.00010984945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039086037,0.000037500045,0.0011849611,0.00001603232,0.000015813477,6.502491e-7,0.013720421,0.0000047101644,0.0000712271,0.9781946,0.006289357,0.000073845025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018754423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009988336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52436537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078569385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009312398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6759175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911278515","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0003","title":"Re-reading Westin","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Anonymity; Information privacy; Reading (process); Privacy policy; Focus (optics); Privacy by Design; Control (management); Negotiation; Right to privacy; Curiosity; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026471485795455982,"score_gpt":0.33031660607444474,"score_spread":0.30384512027898875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911278515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16892783,0.00009268813,0.013265595,0.007876862,0.0015844998,0.00058951427,0.000009799332,0.00026894556,0.80738425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846095,0.000026513846,0.0003734469,0.0006257445,0.00028190634,0.000012322965,0.0000055419473,0.000009682646,0.00020391002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986448,0.0003077614,0.00018425482,0.00022780079,0.00027254492,0.00036283318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991249,0.0003718065,0.0000342619,0.0003416046,0.000034640398,0.000092811315],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013659438,0.00008942085,0.00015026641,0.000044134053,0.00021471061,0.000098735756,0.00045897186,0.00014233455,0.0023279358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012315047,0.000084186395,0.000034153873,0.0002403768,0.026650522,0.0003366476,0.00024883237,0.00023212243,0.0005604214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000316338,0.000026870151,0.0015918642,0.0000095225005,0.0000021089645,0.0000027089086,0.0052168216,9.5287794e-7,0.000049833026,0.9922871,0.00031191797,0.000468659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019220001,0.000049765873,0.000057549005,0.000039659306,0.0000039148886,5.4796146e-7,0.003272413,0.00006881068,0.00054216816,0.9676329,0.028000807,0.00013925646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027024277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001844559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8295331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086022614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043366883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912552388","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0011","title":"Theorizing Privacy in a Liberal Democracy: Canadian Jurisprudence, Anti-Terrorism, and Social Memory After 9/11","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberal democracy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Sociology; Terrorism; Right to privacy; Transparency (behavior); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.010594079133734356,"score_gpt":0.293567769427548,"score_spread":0.28297369029381364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912552388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93866,0.00017515048,0.00008605429,0.006252581,0.0005965691,0.00051218644,0.000010518137,0.00004886594,0.053658076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673814,0.000036807876,0.00005687607,0.0022399183,0.00048555102,0.000035933095,0.0000030350368,0.000025666657,0.0003780769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973323,0.0005918091,0.00037817433,0.0004036951,0.0003661314,0.0009279114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990998,0.00037769607,0.000058559843,0.00020300462,0.000058859456,0.0002021006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014750329,0.00021321636,0.00046127677,0.00015875211,0.0004587085,0.00020348032,0.00039108578,0.00033820418,0.00081040326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001904075,0.00021258042,0.000085561835,0.00035382793,0.024333872,0.00045124596,0.00011832145,0.00042088446,0.00006468065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005928485,0.000025858779,0.03176826,0.000016572822,0.0000061414244,0.00003988732,0.0770095,3.523339e-7,0.000014562611,0.8902895,0.000058796064,0.0007112789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001051288,0.00005076591,0.011072862,0.000095298936,0.00002090607,0.0000017344231,0.018413277,0.00005130845,0.000030612504,0.9589156,0.009777579,0.0005188035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010393501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07351701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06862605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026330267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036190488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008109300","doi":"10.1515/til-2020-0002","title":"25 Years of Elder Law: An Integrative and Historical Account of the Field of Law and Aging","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Constructive; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Sociology; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.024428691493304896,"score_gpt":0.3279550088564711,"score_spread":0.3035263173631662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008109300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992775,0.00096282497,0.001219699,0.005485896,0.00016442373,0.00023533983,0.000006027889,0.000019991563,0.09262826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812186,0.00013297165,0.00011695186,0.0015781559,0.000036657795,0.0000016216356,1.5088936e-7,0.000004141403,0.0000075199173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922776,0.00019000404,0.00018242681,0.00011373521,0.00017658333,0.00010947517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921024,0.00054690987,0.000051804836,0.00010160155,0.000038727645,0.000050706876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023603863,0.000058251917,0.00019545385,0.000011412266,0.00005708704,0.000008492287,0.0001674117,0.00007748622,0.00007483153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024261007,0.000042000436,0.000029244815,0.00011821451,0.02262071,0.00010452423,0.0000964883,0.00013568184,1.23488e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003868917,0.000024367673,0.00045077203,0.000016015843,0.000005847382,7.3305193e-7,0.062479082,1.3540247e-7,0.0004081164,0.9359228,0.000033774566,0.00061967014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034509404,0.00047270788,0.00016516642,0.00029088772,0.00004038897,5.6605535e-7,0.008351901,0.000027480413,0.033438623,0.9527008,0.0040217955,0.00014459471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008732881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005292007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0988443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016329619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022743627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9800392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089303589","doi":"10.1515/til-2020-0015","title":"Territorial Justice in Israel/Palestine","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Palestine; Compromise; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04675035597196315,"score_gpt":0.3338797192303954,"score_spread":0.28712936325843225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089303589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3012039,0.0018982234,0.009842827,0.048190754,0.0074510383,0.000831892,0.000027060662,0.00037612848,0.63017815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947397,0.00003709831,0.00018065481,0.0021567536,0.0028106484,0.000013071466,0.0000019265294,0.000010023455,0.00005008287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856794,0.0002532003,0.00025513791,0.00023263521,0.00027716855,0.0004139394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930716,0.00037252746,0.0000290526,0.00009781393,0.000041271807,0.00015219372],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049445225,0.00011263515,0.00022852128,0.000026905092,0.00013623401,0.00005282185,0.00026669566,0.00011034327,0.00008170032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017039465,0.00010534906,0.000034853812,0.0003031479,0.03445873,0.00014122277,0.00013881168,0.00023035814,0.000094624855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008293008,0.000036029593,0.0052983183,0.000020282669,0.00000335127,0.000026830254,0.00962697,0.0000020023037,0.000020907188,0.9836488,0.000142435,0.0010911453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015144319,0.00022886416,0.00027072403,0.00011931606,0.00004670385,0.0000011739487,0.05878299,0.00013698795,0.00019502884,0.8934696,0.04476814,0.00046605125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019381841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091280445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6935358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056087272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050717048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121641526","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1198","title":"Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dignity; Religious law; Family law; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Arbitration; Allegiance; Sociology; Israeli law; Identity (music); Religious identity; Political science; Private sphere; Public sphere; Private law; Islam; Public law; Religiosity; Black letter law","score_opus":0.03512001175155976,"score_gpt":0.2922466806274343,"score_spread":0.25712666887587454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121641526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61559695,0.00027672635,0.0044370047,0.00097477686,0.000274736,0.0002330789,0.000008012996,0.00008409291,0.3781146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741524,0.00032542198,0.00043959433,0.0015785716,0.00016135185,0.000013010445,0.000025934885,0.000008585883,0.000032279517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846077,0.00027021326,0.00026828,0.00025554837,0.00043563795,0.00030953292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993087,0.00034000885,0.000048785572,0.00016670456,0.000055235367,0.00008054156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004617331,0.000112097536,0.00017950065,0.000070096234,0.00063417834,0.00004144178,0.00024749653,0.00017971215,0.0000629087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020874981,0.000115546674,0.000047017125,0.0002894444,0.036547314,0.00033942432,0.00017799708,0.00018949341,0.00003805052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050420847,0.00007488431,0.0032356097,0.0000031617526,0.0000031025122,0.000060969935,0.03407885,0.00001681309,0.000118403725,0.96186244,0.0004403615,0.0000549938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040569363,0.000036304707,0.0010164201,0.00003455585,0.0000074338964,0.0000016586298,0.0041445442,0.00011322921,0.00018754698,0.99307054,0.00082429353,0.0001577479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017094823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036231005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3818183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018714747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007543706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98945045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122093128","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1253","title":"Ordinary People, Necessary Choices: A Comparative Study of Childcare Expenses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legislature; Flexibility (engineering); Tax deduction; Context (archaeology); Baseline (sea); Variety (cybernetics); Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Order (exchange); Actuarial science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gross income; Tax reform; Computer science; Management; Finance; State income tax","score_opus":0.029280073424633273,"score_gpt":0.3613706878434686,"score_spread":0.3320906144188353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122093128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84597105,0.00010015639,0.00009868355,0.00029402802,0.00048990414,0.00049408444,0.000005643772,0.00005313814,0.15249331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938,0.000010103179,0.000041685893,0.000111534166,0.00033989578,0.000047965783,0.0000022681274,0.00001147124,0.00005507726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981352,0.0003643628,0.0004112682,0.00027701666,0.00047030378,0.0003418489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987768,0.00055066723,0.00012213156,0.00025529118,0.0001751535,0.00011993499],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074563373,0.00015532202,0.00047747028,0.00006225798,0.0003748133,0.000079739286,0.000484176,0.00014822691,0.0006562799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035609963,0.00012818197,0.000049182687,0.00051488855,0.03286366,0.00035518408,0.00014608633,0.00036364485,0.000015988746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007255202,0.00045581354,0.008000316,0.000022041979,0.000014171921,0.0000053525177,0.11807438,0.0000019688873,0.00008380888,0.87310493,0.00006127741,0.00010337458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001610818,0.0012229157,0.0041518207,0.00017271348,0.000057595535,0.0000041267394,0.46089715,0.000024737417,0.0011603421,0.51902544,0.011022404,0.00064994884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00549637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020830277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35407954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020999485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000971426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123715249","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1259","title":"Tax Levels, Structures, and Reforms: Convergence or Persistence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Globalization; Tax competition; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Tax revenue; Ad valorem tax; Convergence (economics); Direct tax; International economics; Market economy; Public economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03215570590205604,"score_gpt":0.2716658884045457,"score_spread":0.23951018250248965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123715249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81958723,0.000099162775,0.00408021,0.0034516933,0.0017150525,0.00033641615,0.0000109392295,0.0002218431,0.17049746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613893,0.000004664631,0.0003931388,0.0026938342,0.0004268116,0.0000062937665,0.0000047334865,0.000012321102,0.00031927417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992069,0.000009067177,0.00018958386,0.00021363822,0.00015715916,0.00022365472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995892,0.000060571045,0.000068971414,0.00019934577,0.000061698054,0.000020228184],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024237066,0.00013034057,0.00015244732,0.000059744812,0.00012255643,0.00020949336,0.00021526453,0.000097010736,0.0045205243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036998544,0.00008721186,0.000023132498,0.00018229074,0.017370615,0.0006704096,0.00016536767,0.00025860776,0.00008193578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006148802,0.000013012748,0.0008011635,0.00004228855,0.0000032349897,0.000008495387,0.00022872712,5.421513e-7,0.00038606307,0.99763286,0.00021559098,0.0006065542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000498476,0.000023291508,0.0019058752,0.00003840027,0.000019191235,0.000011009322,0.0014175081,0.0010247349,0.00089191925,0.7889154,0.20489831,0.0003559039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103282415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020674193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20871747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007664614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010119349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125020779","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0011","title":"Informal Workers’ Aggregation and Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Workforce; Informal sector; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Informal education; Business; Sociology; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03575435948051943,"score_gpt":0.3792886883178452,"score_spread":0.34353432883732576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125020779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5495085,0.00023298994,0.009087462,0.023303602,0.00088875706,0.000675096,0.000016063756,0.00021215204,0.41607538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963762,0.00006582746,0.00008466197,0.002333366,0.00018018263,0.000060126225,0.0000024149467,0.0000123576665,0.00088484987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988122,0.00017987423,0.0003311267,0.00014738309,0.00013385691,0.00039553197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877125,0.00088853977,0.0000528964,0.00016364422,0.000050464056,0.00007318116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050932996,0.00011702026,0.00018577717,0.000029986457,0.0004024836,0.000008597214,0.000089183835,0.00013749386,0.0007471248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017528998,0.000068513276,0.000021792961,0.00007617331,0.029418062,0.00024355177,0.00023534334,0.00018522707,0.00014731083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010142832,0.000010216958,0.04623728,0.000027127602,0.000008373973,0.0000017441446,0.0028441437,3.3462168e-8,0.000014525261,0.94748646,0.00056679704,0.0027018616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012365843,0.000108166685,0.0036520928,0.00054093474,0.000012290518,8.7324855e-7,0.0018436197,0.0000039344823,0.00021942856,0.9567229,0.035468873,0.00019025661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022646245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007612609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4468677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035052955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017649045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125806982","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1000","title":"Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Tort; Political science; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029359555964043813,"score_gpt":0.3850370660161229,"score_spread":0.3556775100520791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125806982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044311494,0.00006474841,0.01670347,0.009292071,0.0003292173,0.00020792727,0.0000057403313,0.00010548468,0.9289799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965164,0.00012349056,0.00029413262,0.0013210292,0.00033905738,0.000033432956,0.000004256206,0.0000067165347,0.001361488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897707,0.0001763556,0.00015103984,0.00018738324,0.00022693831,0.00028122426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990987,0.00050976407,0.00002611887,0.00018588694,0.00006994436,0.00010955294],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050706364,0.00007724884,0.00010290236,0.000026970325,0.000550747,0.000064215485,0.00027189436,0.00009314171,0.0012013728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063789566,0.000071187074,0.000030465117,0.00031760006,0.06060011,0.00019436164,0.00009282873,0.00018895172,0.00031983983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003261255,0.000061656094,0.00018629624,0.0000025874306,0.0000026367475,0.000016259983,0.0036301364,0.000019843525,0.000014668639,0.9951944,0.00042499404,0.00041396255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009764964,0.000024840294,0.00011447687,0.000014684164,0.000013192366,0.000004159591,0.0048703686,0.000054006985,0.00005580415,0.80507267,0.1895796,0.00009852877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028738106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014357407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000914746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103835264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126088849","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1019","title":"Correlativity, Personality, and the Emerging Consensus on Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028136906328389607,"score_gpt":0.3426470481351979,"score_spread":0.3145101418068083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126088849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15160857,0.00041879155,0.0025395367,0.020984955,0.0010521669,0.00041802463,0.000004194536,0.00007202769,0.8229017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997584,0.000080899,0.000013768601,0.0015189574,0.00042573793,0.000014637207,4.4361192e-7,0.000008568855,0.00035299768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811685,0.00079910975,0.00020156895,0.000211439,0.00035212818,0.00031893063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641484,0.0032410175,0.0000597511,0.00011658116,0.00008200672,0.00008579043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020722533,0.000113743576,0.00023468758,0.000026060314,0.00078332314,0.000116623465,0.00016892786,0.00010223544,0.00024856694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020045626,0.000076291224,0.000038861926,0.00027762042,0.096879765,0.00008654746,0.00008592375,0.00029197338,0.000025431102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003235993,0.00003178675,0.000635261,0.00001091214,0.0000097376505,0.000010615041,0.02943283,0.0000071314867,9.329245e-7,0.9687384,0.00024101642,0.0005578189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007636399,0.00006474703,0.00013053144,0.00008767892,0.000049717095,0.000009158202,0.02378194,0.00023858609,0.000011793093,0.96178186,0.012920803,0.00015957294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020654413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094270485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8459754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005752448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000562951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.905578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231325389","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1169","title":"Closing the Gap","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Luck; Epistemology; Action (physics); Inference; Philosophy; Rest (music); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05008031918610636,"score_gpt":0.3192618937435698,"score_spread":0.26918157455746344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231325389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39317158,0.00011607246,0.06280603,0.0045295022,0.0011535452,0.00026951652,0.000004345734,0.00015963287,0.53778976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99503714,0.000009630941,0.00010116107,0.0045271013,0.00018591188,0.0000034374236,2.6819112e-7,0.000011434069,0.00012391701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884415,0.0001194188,0.00021292655,0.00021535247,0.00021538338,0.00039275092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864376,0.00097302377,0.00002478329,0.00028993608,0.000010625797,0.000057880698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000726286,0.00009969848,0.00010014057,0.0000263476,0.00017753265,0.00004848321,0.00037489735,0.000057861413,0.00046400187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006265223,0.000059311045,0.000040160863,0.00026148694,0.05992785,0.00009805559,0.00013225617,0.00023909542,0.00013507203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031072785,0.000031087086,0.000056709207,0.0000033609765,4.541283e-7,0.000037857215,0.00048438174,0.0000023426892,0.015583079,0.98238176,0.00009872857,0.0012891628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011427533,0.00003616533,0.000036223886,0.000015876405,0.0000024974418,0.000018334738,0.0001167177,0.00010069025,0.17518033,0.81963325,0.0046497914,0.00009583412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019606903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030693293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60186553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001949094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007874803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94263047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290766374","doi":"10.1515/til-2022-0015","title":"Bilateral labor agreements as migration governance tools: An analysis from a gender lens","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Gender equality; Work (physics); Human rights; Political science; Inequality; Gender inequality; Gender diversity; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Law; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.041082460714554854,"score_gpt":0.3428963459407654,"score_spread":0.30181388522621055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290766374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432774,0.000045408153,0.0011730021,0.002692676,0.00044484343,0.00016341581,0.00037442482,0.000055752833,0.051773075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954652,0.000028296916,0.00017653765,0.003261105,0.00019703734,0.000053372984,0.00020448156,0.000010130107,0.00060381123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782944,0.000512099,0.0002621648,0.0003023161,0.0007889277,0.0003050534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993883,0.00018003752,0.00006944584,0.00021274423,0.00007583347,0.00007368047],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005849614,0.00011173811,0.00017941899,0.000055581593,0.00048191135,0.00015155156,0.00041857743,0.00005754823,0.013790073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001204253,0.00010958084,0.00008258798,0.00055168266,0.007587027,0.00054643175,0.00013812132,0.00017057465,0.00004214916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010519637,0.00013236303,0.009110811,8.561793e-7,0.00008579197,0.0000128647525,0.014045352,0.00031478965,0.000056542514,0.9759386,0.000086829496,0.000109996894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052593753,0.0001923834,0.008661285,0.0000073448277,0.00017508934,5.0213583e-7,0.006275719,0.0014158573,0.0003900061,0.88503224,0.09692889,0.00039473467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005035877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005168909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09684206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028865968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006166813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99511373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321602674","doi":"10.1515/til-2023-0011","title":"Good faith in employment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Scope (computer science); Business; Law; Bad faith; Transformative learning; Political science; Good faith; Sociology","score_opus":0.02533934397680164,"score_gpt":0.25463574732860367,"score_spread":0.22929640335180201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321602674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87592477,0.000016404414,0.00041847437,0.0019073695,0.0004327841,0.00024379294,0.0000017753833,0.00029272557,0.12076192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745023,0.0000035531134,0.000018908124,0.0014479844,0.00046760982,0.000029458755,0.000025538544,0.000024278675,0.0005324295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988299,0.00001727144,0.00028805554,0.00025777958,0.00020723337,0.00039978512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959385,0.000079868056,0.000044074433,0.00023908324,0.000029972249,0.000013121586],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043601647,0.0001515524,0.0002134996,0.00021365524,0.00008309687,0.00017593891,0.0002555123,0.000072774295,0.0012481214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016639897,0.00012296835,0.00004093893,0.00062916306,0.008432965,0.0004097771,0.00027674748,0.00016457218,0.0014637291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038158116,0.00005937632,0.0026953504,0.00003728089,0.00000337705,0.00008113905,0.0001262295,0.00001941872,0.000024571314,0.99599636,0.00070910784,0.00020966181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043095092,0.000011417663,0.0013148211,0.000056785044,0.000006164368,4.7156632e-7,0.0001287726,0.0005733765,0.00006891638,0.98067915,0.016546888,0.00018229548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038903934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028183573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12152549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030385838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008700748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W577197919","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0004","title":"Organizing: Should the Employer Have a Say?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Freedom of association; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Labour law; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.042896892642980015,"score_gpt":0.3436806157805566,"score_spread":0.30078372313757656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W577197919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17005286,0.00015556192,0.029125087,0.28477493,0.0014281117,0.00077068445,0.00003592846,0.0003037018,0.51335317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908951,0.000042721626,0.000059599977,0.0067909784,0.0002830437,0.000014215784,5.205073e-7,0.00001411801,0.0018996865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998637,0.00028736267,0.00017750787,0.00017408408,0.0003228532,0.0004011836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988873,0.00064806273,0.000027688577,0.00027928385,0.00006518418,0.000092466085],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089324865,0.000095264724,0.00011883902,0.000021144491,0.00042997653,0.00008307857,0.0004284942,0.00010050474,0.0038033777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005925792,0.000044594133,0.000038517235,0.00018589955,0.06406705,0.0001488406,0.00014038545,0.00012171476,0.000042708583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010608132,0.00003473786,0.00088924635,5.0054354e-7,0.000006900393,0.0000030548522,0.0060779997,7.2934704e-8,0.00015020634,0.9907209,0.0012107404,0.000894994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018159636,0.000026033646,0.0003184482,0.000020333464,0.0000070069445,2.7535907e-7,0.0020758177,7.5818946e-7,0.00065135706,0.81616616,0.18045428,0.0000979597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014246748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076286896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82084227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072150615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005541862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99710727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886156249","doi":"10.1515/til-2024-0021","title":"Imagining how U.S. federalism would affect third-party funding regulation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Government (linguistics); Legalization; Enforcement; Commission; State (computer science); Accountability; Normative; Federal law","score_opus":0.04278326659619959,"score_gpt":0.28256914219585066,"score_spread":0.2397858755996511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886156249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17240666,0.0068905107,0.26793674,0.0346945,0.004546063,0.000603777,0.00012612958,0.00070198264,0.5120936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784005,0.000044621895,0.00034487376,0.00068189675,0.00024222575,0.000018891982,0.000020217625,0.00002794083,0.00077929813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987064,0.000037042715,0.00038671642,0.00041592514,0.00007039155,0.00038354404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994464,0.00014830966,0.00006490291,0.00023829206,0.000021049209,0.0000810529],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007147407,0.00017717162,0.00032068565,0.00015623192,0.00013646163,0.00047481252,0.00016690395,0.0002282618,0.0007561676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024789976,0.00018191997,0.00011474945,0.00038166536,0.0063312803,0.0004934608,0.0000856565,0.000347439,0.00037303512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017776954,0.00001646815,0.00093014207,0.00003840516,0.000010562074,0.000010960539,0.0005935957,0.000030621308,0.000042056483,0.99633104,0.0013272086,0.0006511911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016728866,0.00003601596,0.0008988494,0.00008243687,0.000004811645,0.0000063618477,0.00011592314,0.00506288,0.00031540153,0.93020695,0.06287239,0.00023066333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013332879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042631746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013767692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014647559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99637294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}