{"meta":{"query_hash":"44e27f922d6f","filters":{"venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law"},"cohort_total":49,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":49,"exported":49,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/44e27f922d6f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Theoretical+Inquiries+in+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1623388010","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-104","title":"Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Humanity; Political philosophy; Law and economics; International law; Political science; Popular sovereignty; Power (physics); Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049915315287974174,"score_gpt":0.3507328770423187,"score_spread":0.30081756175434454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623388010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056761585,0.047256198,0.038263224,0.4099948,0.0015769298,0.000047003505,0.00010950061,0.00008513086,0.4459057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96002585,0.0077201864,0.0047824793,0.011597234,0.00097522704,0.00008253585,0.000035730816,0.000055379987,0.01472537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960859,0.0025145514,0.000107892316,0.00042693873,0.0006023325,0.00026226748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946942,0.003927173,0.0003194144,0.00039584577,0.00040547704,0.0002577836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005946087,0.00039368516,0.0005806695,0.0024444028,0.004840802,0.009186717,0.0012591442,0.0054203304,0.0037476541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092635825,0.00032742662,0.0005326216,0.0020712041,0.03451825,0.013808358,0.0041276556,0.006867273,0.00045781056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028205336,0.0000020839423,0.000015392214,0.0000056062204,9.289591e-7,0.000013318298,0.00082250225,0.000073885734,0.000009788096,0.9975998,0.000978854,0.00047499858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058213677,0.0000025127667,0.00003477651,0.000043186596,0.0000020648156,0.000014699694,0.0004901137,0.00025309366,0.000022124612,0.98665434,0.012473132,0.000004247658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006196792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049809935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010428835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010428835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034657514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075666845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1644300354","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-110","title":"Sovereignty as Trusteeship and Indigenous Peoples","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Colonialism; Political science; Law; Paternalism; International law; Duty; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028482701137677154,"score_gpt":0.3320846004974409,"score_spread":0.3036018993597637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1644300354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33875895,0.007757026,0.009148879,0.04540467,0.0003096481,0.000034774006,0.000027970706,0.000020707355,0.59853745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950053,0.0004513144,0.00024788396,0.00056206994,0.00005335675,0.0000071827053,0.0000028249442,0.0000024462315,0.0036674952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959258,0.0021443744,0.00016345791,0.0003827404,0.00060104916,0.000782552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573517,0.002453135,0.0005773139,0.00029952909,0.0004842139,0.00045058562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004007521,0.00012503382,0.00026740707,0.00084123237,0.005187114,0.0055027963,0.0006489172,0.0027180072,0.0036209559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057979785,0.00017029032,0.0002733795,0.0007353682,0.03236466,0.0063274284,0.006276472,0.0038339603,0.00013470603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016682023,0.00000533558,0.00048142427,0.0000082555425,0.0000018003128,0.00007973396,0.010561902,0.00006715541,0.000040008723,0.98731005,0.00029623095,0.001146525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016682947,0.00004414679,0.0039047136,0.000233293,0.000016973647,0.0003728363,0.021591075,0.0011292651,0.00019534714,0.8801436,0.09231128,0.00004082591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018411973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014519495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018411973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045283954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028747276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03660959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963547191","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1139","title":"Functionalism and Political Economy in the Comparative Study of Consumer Insolvency: An Unfinished Story from England and Wales","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Ideology; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economy; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.03833989309812411,"score_gpt":0.3380792953903343,"score_spread":0.2997394022922102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963547191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73453003,0.01244986,0.00090721407,0.025180923,0.00015033748,0.000024253013,0.000056130364,0.0000056172544,0.22669558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98735785,0.001919124,0.00012400998,0.0010916549,0.000030113195,0.000018771123,0.000015166245,0.000010402227,0.009432995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959429,0.002787327,0.00008975858,0.00013095165,0.00035772054,0.00069138256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995378,0.003571564,0.00026015317,0.00013569774,0.0003726933,0.0002818829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003218801,0.0001746767,0.00052380963,0.0030587735,0.008235973,0.0071182433,0.0006042496,0.0018990103,0.004692331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005713276,0.00026930193,0.00018704418,0.0042491243,0.018241266,0.004758683,0.0040995455,0.0025076463,0.00019824223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068158704,0.000028958582,0.0036048442,0.00014830238,0.000009623737,0.0013937161,0.4632159,0.000114635266,0.00026885403,0.51813173,0.002329613,0.010685743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021913505,0.00007949086,0.038160946,0.0006422475,0.000016686186,0.0008863117,0.71400124,0.0002747258,0.00025900215,0.042884544,0.20272467,0.000048243495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13780932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2357636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13780932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014809271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035779558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2740144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965277367","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1258","title":"Comparative Taxation and Legal Theory: The Tax Design Case of the Transplant of General Anti-Avoidance Rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax reform; Tax law; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Indirect tax; Double taxation; Law and economics; Economics; Direct tax","score_opus":0.020004447956183627,"score_gpt":0.2674586854296543,"score_spread":0.24745423747347067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965277367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31098235,0.0022805291,0.059325423,0.01564779,0.00013355704,0.00019123829,0.00006778438,0.00006230052,0.61130905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98793435,0.0002620699,0.0050500333,0.00040878032,0.000015872776,0.00004801206,0.000012812555,0.000010957142,0.006257029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952383,0.0028146452,0.000114014,0.00041623073,0.000767979,0.00064887776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659973,0.0017883406,0.00037467107,0.00063202955,0.00037237062,0.00023292292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058969217,0.00024949215,0.0005248081,0.001783415,0.0084329145,0.0070992312,0.0013489826,0.0026739163,0.004162046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008800454,0.0002818236,0.00057994603,0.002442793,0.035004605,0.0069334423,0.0036504897,0.0026825734,0.00017147767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005368495,0.0000047877606,0.00021000826,0.000007689707,0.0000013623703,0.000045582365,0.0016874099,0.0003352049,0.000033512195,0.9955916,0.00011566808,0.0019618357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005067671,0.000058196518,0.0020792307,0.00012341274,0.000022839627,0.00024754365,0.005457256,0.004526114,0.00054577243,0.92443806,0.062428966,0.00002191452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047091834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046545792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047091834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02050348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008742821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14876384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969029342","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1158","title":"Citizenship with a Vengeance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Amnesty; Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Immigration; Argument (complex analysis); Globalization; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.016126527560400006,"score_gpt":0.32293648690307847,"score_spread":0.30680995934267846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969029342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07176238,0.002433904,0.0113854585,0.04305669,0.0006846984,0.000045626908,0.000047347476,0.00009823985,0.8704857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93640476,0.0006383238,0.0014517605,0.0035114354,0.00021525015,0.000036827554,0.000030171163,0.000036655096,0.05767476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655557,0.0017369487,0.000112213624,0.0004973391,0.0005075015,0.00059038517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794143,0.0005856378,0.00023164778,0.00039998817,0.00030388605,0.0005375125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027914618,0.00026148307,0.00033838162,0.0008813479,0.0077171023,0.007266743,0.0006886701,0.0029701726,0.00881103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004581808,0.00015286,0.00031255325,0.00067791133,0.028831534,0.008089998,0.008231347,0.0038257665,0.0010116878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000390887,0.0000090778785,0.000488712,0.000009013575,0.0000018760919,0.00007244756,0.0079373885,0.00003588563,0.0000535756,0.9846736,0.0024336793,0.0042808442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011457106,0.00005388652,0.0015768207,0.00019100915,0.000008664102,0.00040452252,0.020928968,0.00026513595,0.00019988428,0.5376641,0.43866777,0.000027746579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004575888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059224195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00881103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022867064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037990566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029475808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971249996","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1150","title":"The Critical Modernism of Hannah Arendt","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Trilogy; Modernism (music); Successor cardinal; Politics; Metaphysics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Literature; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02380308296743102,"score_gpt":0.3541619359858111,"score_spread":0.3303588530183801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971249996","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015192553,0.03669147,0.0090714125,0.6088607,0.0059555033,0.00003709049,0.00004086278,0.000051248466,0.3240993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8383188,0.012822552,0.0046871332,0.07596113,0.0055600763,0.00013763846,0.000033662785,0.00006402547,0.062414948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954117,0.0026122124,0.00008561953,0.00048416576,0.0010372574,0.000369044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957814,0.002972196,0.00020268654,0.00023821575,0.00049746205,0.0003080819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050413366,0.00037052768,0.0003241264,0.0011130096,0.006176349,0.0052039293,0.0007370004,0.00367438,0.003460002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00974685,0.00022910617,0.00024159832,0.0008414224,0.02892865,0.0075413035,0.002588011,0.007150693,0.0004366094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063495445,0.00001021661,0.000049114376,0.000021578417,0.0000016388689,0.00002729308,0.003034435,0.000049510305,0.00003399751,0.9710109,0.022737002,0.0030178607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012558414,0.000011162338,0.00018409369,0.00017777782,0.0000032188545,0.00006994382,0.0025743314,0.00031018016,0.00016375098,0.71757746,0.27890098,0.00001457944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006000748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005841378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073936437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073936437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040907576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053644896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984682637","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1255","title":"Tax Transplants and Local Culture: A Comparative Study of the Chinese and Canadian GAAR","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Divergence (linguistics); China; Legal culture; Political science; Ideology; Law; Tax avoidance; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.011092599745191153,"score_gpt":0.26267188891192733,"score_spread":0.25157928916673616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984682637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964561,0.00016073143,0.000016438878,0.000115211325,0.0000038736766,0.000005604372,0.000050216888,0.0000010949198,0.0031907167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857175,0.00028091174,0.000029923167,0.00005303839,0.0000024578483,0.000004646285,0.000076195145,0.0000026292676,0.0009784201],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903154,0.00013732622,0.000024475241,0.00008281881,0.00024842622,0.0004753556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977738,0.00039685986,0.00039949006,0.00008351289,0.00079541904,0.0005508698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009054474,0.00028904126,0.0005044518,0.0028528327,0.009742459,0.002463363,0.00091522647,0.0003685452,0.0036471563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027977885,0.00021424923,0.00026326568,0.009709027,0.0038203164,0.0008438267,0.0016752788,0.00087308313,0.00016959873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019390883,0.00018262186,0.51748276,0.0001412991,0.0000886189,0.0010452949,0.4396569,0.00022993132,0.0010030023,0.0053185676,0.002081504,0.032575533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061825767,0.000065140455,0.57455355,0.00005569432,0.000032114072,0.00012925862,0.41896158,0.00015840965,0.00011133793,0.00015793614,0.0057346546,0.000034083005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97154284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028457165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025167806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020480298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1826061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985756541","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1181","title":"Comment on David Enoch's Luck Between Morality, Law, and Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Luck; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.054111860622361854,"score_gpt":0.33499492003137904,"score_spread":0.2808830594090172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985756541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021412714,0.00084667606,0.00012240584,0.9898114,0.006989669,0.000004384474,0.00003580936,0.00001143459,0.0019640643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026654932,0.00029597318,0.000093505434,0.9876436,0.005781956,0.000021827638,0.000009066544,0.000017955097,0.0034705638],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929027,0.0020533619,0.00049716263,0.001456621,0.002141178,0.00094901444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713208,0.021187898,0.0010286421,0.0008465721,0.0034283916,0.0021875778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01209736,0.0011960925,0.0023555288,0.0015250042,0.011547194,0.007855447,0.006703876,0.07533069,0.0066560465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040994376,0.0012206458,0.0014498685,0.0016855355,0.022403719,0.011787626,0.00603541,0.11542604,0.005602633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044689514,0.000012891118,0.00015849173,0.00005881613,0.000013453359,0.00015347765,0.0014143954,0.000060201848,0.00005982182,0.039569795,0.9563934,0.0020605135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007576691,0.00002448473,0.00092201296,0.0004791184,0.00003231689,0.00023635481,0.0044233543,0.0002372742,0.00038339634,0.07171346,0.92136925,0.00010334207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04153031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060312986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07533069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006956496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008175253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08257717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997782852","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1093","title":"Settlement, Return, and the Supersession Thesis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Settlement (finance); Indigenous; Human settlement; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01548796120428758,"score_gpt":0.3141964076059255,"score_spread":0.2987084464016379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997782852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12778065,0.0069441292,0.02296466,0.06819528,0.0018114869,0.00013139435,0.00007015308,0.00005888577,0.7720433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547355,0.0014295548,0.0016272619,0.005044441,0.0007517091,0.00009948945,0.000047516773,0.000045630284,0.036218874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937836,0.0031912643,0.00028123875,0.00089973706,0.0010013558,0.00084275095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958364,0.0020703361,0.0004904894,0.00063807744,0.00066969305,0.00029505568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066896537,0.00038107045,0.00055652816,0.00092931057,0.0056500575,0.0064362693,0.0015469481,0.003216362,0.007564508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010291982,0.00025466213,0.00074356823,0.00088526274,0.039033838,0.008251848,0.0072109415,0.006679683,0.00091011333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010724997,0.000010367975,0.00037609885,0.000022076914,0.0000037833422,0.00013927395,0.008168936,0.000060722316,0.000039653794,0.98568463,0.0018996549,0.0035841104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007487019,0.00008831495,0.0025806185,0.00031738653,0.00001706941,0.0006546197,0.019770361,0.00056186505,0.0003676161,0.81226134,0.16326886,0.000037075417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004298102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003250425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007564508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032171342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002549918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035378695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003235112","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1280","title":"The Efficacy of Regulation as a Function of Psychological Fit: Reexamining the Hard Law/Soft Law Continuum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hard law; Soft law; Law; Compliance (psychology); Perspective (graphical); Function (biology); Incentive; Philosophy of law; Psychology; Social psychology; Comparative law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; International law","score_opus":0.07379689688929711,"score_gpt":0.34910201110018635,"score_spread":0.2753051142108892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003235112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589199,0.0002619213,0.0044394815,0.0023092008,0.000015885911,0.00007857016,0.000039760653,0.000026818563,0.03390855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988507,0.000037212783,0.000673138,0.00011261051,0.000012435253,0.000026120066,0.000019982916,0.000013023609,0.00025476786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945064,0.003010293,0.00018594145,0.00065615383,0.0011806546,0.00046059236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92183965,0.05711492,0.0071891453,0.0068730735,0.0037935688,0.0031896438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012119204,0.00034519102,0.00059727044,0.0026165582,0.0015414093,0.005171196,0.0011008222,0.0019230536,0.005273351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054738004,0.00033722518,0.00063300354,0.0014655936,0.009964675,0.0059616086,0.0061915317,0.0046266736,0.00033123413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002009809,0.0029709104,0.59303606,0.00027480736,0.0003474338,0.0004935304,0.05951375,0.0029270635,0.0062045497,0.22242494,0.0009185453,0.10887865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013345183,0.000735128,0.8730438,0.00010675598,0.00013408177,0.0002794739,0.018619128,0.012018297,0.0014968684,0.090690345,0.0026637018,0.00007907823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013051553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073065405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012119204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014468692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000818635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06409323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036014529","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1249","title":"An Examination of Convergence and Resistance in Global Tax Reform Trends","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Jurisdiction; Convergence (economics); Tax reform; Political science; Politics; Value-added tax; Political economy; Face value; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.011360619556756161,"score_gpt":0.2585174977168316,"score_spread":0.24715687816007542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036014529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8711337,0.0046641314,0.00079839403,0.008870639,0.00008292224,0.000045826517,0.00022714619,0.00003976111,0.11413741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995497,0.0017815479,0.00024824328,0.00037943377,0.000056159115,0.000013069388,0.00011577274,0.00002167945,0.0018872176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697065,0.0009511911,0.00018635526,0.000479012,0.0007565714,0.00065620075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407506,0.0018284795,0.0016910871,0.0005003189,0.0015716912,0.0003333424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004288996,0.00023877676,0.00045382744,0.00917663,0.0023090744,0.0069381027,0.0006401214,0.0012111448,0.003998069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011412006,0.00023749779,0.00036609836,0.013061224,0.0056062895,0.00642947,0.0042664837,0.0022260097,0.0003732028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003462928,0.0001397205,0.18207434,0.000741312,0.00016568093,0.0016129902,0.23747075,0.0021475188,0.0021564676,0.33670595,0.006171673,0.2302673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029313605,0.00036602,0.61284876,0.0009116482,0.00011013237,0.0012163514,0.18747497,0.002047919,0.0024230985,0.027555265,0.16492672,0.00008975584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008486812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011147314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00917663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050399476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019546156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03656751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036475377","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-008","title":"Corporate Fiduciary Duties and Prudential Regulation of Financial Institutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Corporation; Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Corporate law; Shareholder; Liability; Law; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.09868123007834605,"score_gpt":0.35699083718970587,"score_spread":0.2583096071113598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036475377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2340819,0.004177109,0.10167702,0.03211601,0.00047109343,0.00014644465,0.00008823917,0.00012091004,0.6271212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862959,0.00036919504,0.0038938224,0.0024037557,0.0001666082,0.00005734639,0.000013569076,0.000009626652,0.006790251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861362,0.00469237,0.0008383978,0.0017157309,0.0044946494,0.002122648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712622,0.011496278,0.0063286573,0.0045490325,0.0046959887,0.0016679524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122216875,0.00027454365,0.00039264973,0.001472831,0.003033862,0.0069508553,0.0014606266,0.0051556327,0.0022645213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02312338,0.0004442366,0.0006608485,0.000700828,0.020387586,0.0036590083,0.0039060162,0.0048610168,0.00031285733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007779773,0.000028158785,0.001118028,0.0000124634535,0.00000660732,0.00004813967,0.0006413389,0.0010767032,0.00025670658,0.991928,0.0007225222,0.004153603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002933936,0.000057798665,0.0070626074,0.00022210546,0.00003028527,0.00013960325,0.00046458966,0.00514009,0.0009985224,0.9547101,0.031089319,0.000055593126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009867679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00909339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122216875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060551423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007828016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06463528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036875568","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1107","title":"Conflicts of Interest in Publicly-Traded and Closely-Held Corporations: A Comparative and Economic Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Negotiation; Transaction cost; Adjudication; Business; Liability; Law and economics; Database transaction; Economics; Law; Finance; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.09212785268488419,"score_gpt":0.28678276775453043,"score_spread":0.19465491506964624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036875568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51043195,0.049965642,0.004640263,0.0085577825,0.00016355423,0.00010402288,0.00035217666,0.000006707929,0.42577788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846846,0.009317698,0.00073302654,0.000347921,0.0001396684,0.000044310036,0.00012961777,0.0000034397422,0.004599639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958702,0.0025175237,0.00010531572,0.0001511608,0.0007801559,0.000575666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98869354,0.008723251,0.001364961,0.00019813082,0.0007281111,0.00029194562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032385774,0.0001851357,0.00028366962,0.0049677715,0.002536706,0.0045771697,0.0007196791,0.0017918685,0.00699042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009697672,0.00018620731,0.0005699144,0.0042538983,0.004696435,0.0036871135,0.0017567523,0.0013731192,0.00030531923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001047833,0.00014297696,0.020816442,0.00016892236,0.000060221126,0.0005997288,0.0021578998,0.0016592429,0.00014307558,0.94405997,0.002628975,0.027457848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013519864,0.0008365417,0.36888808,0.0016458093,0.0004540186,0.005575501,0.04378917,0.0152626755,0.0015261744,0.35367292,0.20805442,0.0001593644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008159806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012229565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008159806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064400123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012450169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04672581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040638741","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1153","title":"Who Is the Citizen's Other? Considering the Heft of Citizenship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Statelessness; Refugee; Stateless protocol; Political science; Social citizenship; Politics; Sociology; Law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.027314552713529734,"score_gpt":0.33318446980151295,"score_spread":0.3058699170879832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040638741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18857837,0.0097619025,0.019806266,0.19630182,0.0016597606,0.000050415907,0.00005618784,0.000068110785,0.5837171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831324,0.0013346163,0.0007014831,0.0044279406,0.00029045108,0.00002481659,0.000017212458,0.000040727147,0.01003046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922941,0.005301627,0.000121754056,0.00073874125,0.0005634964,0.0009803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971155,0.0015555869,0.00022744494,0.0003256498,0.00029075175,0.00048509208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059041297,0.00040724612,0.00049569795,0.0013749603,0.02004763,0.015337576,0.0013275747,0.004698519,0.004491164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060644876,0.00022566774,0.00047616145,0.0014305523,0.07990873,0.024992011,0.011865213,0.007956106,0.00049732206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055639043,0.000004926963,0.00040387383,0.000014309328,0.0000022500924,0.00019300192,0.0684251,0.00003497259,0.000041745723,0.92653,0.0018783355,0.002465924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009805241,0.000023738632,0.00076294795,0.00029375227,0.000010825542,0.0003288809,0.21953477,0.00030528338,0.0002404347,0.59576625,0.18269645,0.000026898804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014043165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013951105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02004763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061122254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004649208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044347584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042208543","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1127","title":"Facts on the Ground and Reconciliation of Divergent Consumer Insolvency Philosophies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Debt; Debtor; Opposition (politics); Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.03783276758323504,"score_gpt":0.3068127772802049,"score_spread":0.26898000969696984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042208543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1190755,0.018206976,0.015762134,0.19353692,0.0027310783,0.00007135482,0.00029478237,0.00009553905,0.65022564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93704695,0.0064528007,0.0051592086,0.024439322,0.0021293126,0.00013140032,0.00024030758,0.00014805187,0.02425273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995139,0.0020678146,0.00023779615,0.00090336165,0.0010574706,0.00059451896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907069,0.0059205494,0.0006174916,0.0014043178,0.0010608069,0.00028997913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009990174,0.00038254494,0.00052211806,0.0024723234,0.0049270997,0.010289394,0.0014899969,0.0048036575,0.0065038167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012222539,0.00034561494,0.00042132262,0.0028373164,0.03966034,0.014854197,0.0049587404,0.011354133,0.00068453985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003028695,0.000009651015,0.00027498938,0.000021279151,0.000004763141,0.000094283896,0.008961554,0.000045730314,0.00006639409,0.9784491,0.005387577,0.0066544237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037012178,0.00002823466,0.0017327345,0.0003051808,0.000014513736,0.00026600843,0.011672213,0.0002608799,0.00030373177,0.7165228,0.2688184,0.00003821053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024741678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027488035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010289394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037981689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017680766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052833676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043700055","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1291","title":"Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Family law; Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Law reform; Law; Political science; Best interests; Welfare; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07582124601240359,"score_gpt":0.3830031713158916,"score_spread":0.30718192530348803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043700055","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36841923,0.026538499,0.0012510075,0.44509447,0.0014013586,0.00006881342,0.000051355568,0.000033894787,0.15714131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387888,0.00610905,0.00066712283,0.028521411,0.00019906306,0.000040491705,0.000013942832,0.000011709262,0.025648417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967077,0.0013834614,0.00009254045,0.00027151802,0.00058619987,0.00095848175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974711,0.00069463596,0.00036087332,0.00020919584,0.00058117387,0.00068303494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041733664,0.00013629523,0.00032663002,0.0010206355,0.0089782085,0.0051374515,0.0009729883,0.003933813,0.0040994794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011106123,0.00021919866,0.00025214563,0.00127624,0.011965336,0.0062556043,0.0040627937,0.0042938353,0.00021201873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026613441,0.00013379303,0.007507543,0.00029722316,0.00002109149,0.00087258447,0.11251965,0.00033310914,0.00048703264,0.7613948,0.022260595,0.09414596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003581872,0.0002256097,0.099821545,0.0017595714,0.00005269984,0.00067913905,0.1525079,0.0010316334,0.00055344036,0.17522348,0.5680021,0.00010709773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23697694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29084972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23697694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016524473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031601604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4711951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046776891","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1292","title":"Something Old, Something New? Re-theorizing Patriarchal Relations and Privatization from the Outskirts of Family Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Family law; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.059238919851540256,"score_gpt":0.35029443015572254,"score_spread":0.2910555103041823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046776891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25572106,0.030727612,0.017323375,0.19520555,0.00051573117,0.00008916246,0.000044457276,0.00008141726,0.50029165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884975,0.0029325269,0.00061929796,0.0019238897,0.00006411635,0.000019611998,0.0000054663637,0.000019956153,0.005917718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949351,0.003289022,0.00006542432,0.00031830446,0.00060010835,0.0007919316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646395,0.002383337,0.00028090057,0.00024725051,0.0003625122,0.0002620652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066540544,0.000373314,0.0003609517,0.0024276911,0.015468797,0.011616969,0.0017847763,0.0032091942,0.0018060714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005428045,0.00030633333,0.00032028698,0.001683634,0.1293381,0.013509043,0.0041156285,0.0064703096,0.00016825987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002988297,0.000009832472,0.00039664144,0.000023209015,0.00000164371,0.00014841174,0.1755398,0.00009437817,0.000053084637,0.81919193,0.0007605354,0.0037774823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010470289,0.000024916799,0.0020842883,0.0006385922,0.000011441975,0.00035182395,0.29972506,0.0008388186,0.0003289929,0.50518954,0.19077024,0.00002584422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27267602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20798373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27267602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039358873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022722062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54217774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057609726","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1154","title":"The Worth of Citizenship in an Unequal World","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Entitlement (fair division); Politics; Legitimacy; Scrutiny; Sociology; Economic Justice; Obligation; Population; Function (biology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03522674584828078,"score_gpt":0.40109550790755,"score_spread":0.3658687620592692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057609726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24817982,0.0053956886,0.030908545,0.07348228,0.000663925,0.00006854751,0.000080304424,0.00004631124,0.64117455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233115,0.00061050814,0.0011978088,0.0015179225,0.00023097174,0.000037053196,0.000017972381,0.000018055358,0.0040384177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993238,0.003956592,0.0001790833,0.00084124383,0.00088400906,0.0009011588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99389523,0.0028875489,0.00072279794,0.001249267,0.00040568647,0.0008394624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006935527,0.00034114067,0.00060404494,0.0015597421,0.009391166,0.011603327,0.0011327653,0.0037001339,0.004405614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009551691,0.00029160685,0.0004030433,0.0011622156,0.08683682,0.021204092,0.011768046,0.004981546,0.00039053685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009146779,0.000007789141,0.00052221486,0.000008340016,0.0000057734906,0.00005504159,0.006060607,0.00007852183,0.000046274406,0.9899451,0.00044920467,0.0028120056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009576168,0.000017179187,0.0011263202,0.00005763295,0.000007710431,0.00011225755,0.008825343,0.00018906851,0.000089430585,0.9694713,0.020083407,0.00001076465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002103571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023847565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011603327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036391441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018828821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03667897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063592555","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1023","title":"Criminal Theory in the Twentieth Century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Culpability; Public law; Comparative law; Political science; Common law; Normative; Punishment (psychology); Presumption; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.027713424019522738,"score_gpt":0.34247547716345256,"score_spread":0.3147620531439298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063592555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049053945,0.15146224,0.0049539004,0.063997455,0.0026040433,0.00005475185,0.00011103106,0.00004452143,0.7277181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6543889,0.096488036,0.0043259184,0.016251242,0.0020610804,0.00018517397,0.00013788378,0.00006561736,0.22609621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985781,0.00050653296,0.000060162565,0.00023832591,0.00036470452,0.0002522739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988765,0.0005394774,0.00015112026,0.000062822306,0.00021713055,0.00015304473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009942485,0.00038635923,0.00031763263,0.0030461852,0.0071841697,0.0053314515,0.0009412685,0.0033923439,0.0046724994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023578731,0.00020203715,0.00023310941,0.0022085086,0.026006488,0.0043064426,0.002363126,0.0028901885,0.0005981506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036276447,0.0000145628865,0.00022505107,0.000032989803,0.0000014953836,0.00012599313,0.0038977603,0.00015295002,0.000020719757,0.98311645,0.0054934686,0.0069149896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011558946,0.000021965318,0.0015328138,0.0004944806,0.0000030736162,0.00028436686,0.0030115598,0.0003798908,0.000064168526,0.2867153,0.70746195,0.000018867475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0472076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050593097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0472076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01825838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060541895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13247442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069029812","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1163","title":"(In)Security and Citizenship: Security, Im/migration and Shrinking Citizenship Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Resizing; Political science; Business; Law; Politics; Economic policy","score_opus":0.015787696996087345,"score_gpt":0.3150778134869479,"score_spread":0.29929011649086057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069029812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56164247,0.0075379657,0.002645517,0.060327712,0.00027769065,0.00002532462,0.000043218333,0.000025216294,0.36747485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99288416,0.0010122646,0.00017472434,0.0006861574,0.000036546648,0.0000061516103,0.000007515957,0.000003908225,0.005188603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990345,0.00040140125,0.000029589413,0.00006855251,0.00013533184,0.00033068756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936837,0.00020901908,0.00013215534,0.00005222428,0.00007905041,0.00015917067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001168089,0.00013971732,0.00017079117,0.00074278703,0.005721972,0.005784156,0.00045469456,0.0010043221,0.0031880809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014920321,0.00006422093,0.00014174062,0.0010786883,0.026276497,0.0025707446,0.0037776595,0.0014277147,0.0001418991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020973346,0.000025688947,0.013990862,0.00006580329,0.0000044405083,0.00044201248,0.1906742,0.00014730897,0.00021805782,0.7636229,0.0048464253,0.025941344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128048405,0.000062163905,0.0696097,0.0005433229,0.000019628744,0.0008088885,0.51140743,0.0006071355,0.00041144967,0.15894862,0.25753862,0.000030239375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11066548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13927777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11066548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062888917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055167796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22004265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095581877","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1007","title":"Communities of Judgment and Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Epistemology; Human rights; Set (abstract data type); Relation (database); Common sense; Sociology; Law; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04300944005400052,"score_gpt":0.35848443865536544,"score_spread":0.3154749986013649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095581877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04486464,0.009562932,0.028504018,0.06592083,0.0006571466,0.000087367436,0.000036165147,0.000079173486,0.8502878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972648,0.0016905963,0.004420798,0.0026082634,0.000318908,0.000082616694,0.000020472618,0.00002952539,0.018180776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98191273,0.011472869,0.00042377439,0.0017254998,0.0028629238,0.0016022626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982483,0.00597968,0.00092826516,0.001079457,0.0013135069,0.0008742772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011682599,0.00041900494,0.0005322635,0.0021459493,0.010191396,0.011094069,0.0011974461,0.0052069174,0.0051836874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019969324,0.00024231992,0.00048034507,0.0015808864,0.057962883,0.01097979,0.008675679,0.0044917865,0.00057271717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024460896,0.0000039606684,0.000076906814,0.000009370016,0.0000014189374,0.0000152281955,0.0019424352,0.00010604146,0.000017142514,0.99445045,0.0009397186,0.0024350444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053227677,0.0000059335784,0.00016414608,0.00003655347,0.0000015144491,0.000021098183,0.0014874873,0.00028764148,0.000033449684,0.9740893,0.023862313,0.0000051373418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00720657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050656428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011682599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008124701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076131104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061784208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119769935","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1027","title":"Harm and Fault in Discrimination Law: The Transition from Intentional to Adverse Effect Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Statute; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Employment discrimination; Liability; Harm; Malice; Political science; Jurisdiction; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02107537109339203,"score_gpt":0.3369209354750022,"score_spread":0.31584556438161016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119769935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124397315,0.022376295,0.13168566,0.20286646,0.0024620148,0.00012601986,0.00007090234,0.00014691487,0.51586837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700528,0.0036733695,0.006032156,0.009751629,0.0012604692,0.00007229197,0.000014959635,0.000043872144,0.009098482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029994,0.0035937412,0.00042884008,0.0008867492,0.0035453886,0.0012453577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235934,0.0055038454,0.00049217086,0.0006445059,0.00060827006,0.00039186515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007902748,0.00041799762,0.00064574374,0.001792154,0.0054915138,0.009200585,0.0016460646,0.010269203,0.0019489161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015419796,0.00039749226,0.000864481,0.000901664,0.06880342,0.01779581,0.008042442,0.014318652,0.000295798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023736582,0.0000052860255,0.00009982174,0.000006824837,4.3268318e-7,0.00005726444,0.0012606843,0.00008098672,0.0000350447,0.9965301,0.00022761751,0.0016936639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050951126,0.000021987296,0.00029655063,0.000079757774,0.0000026490002,0.00014516861,0.00096208765,0.00050016347,0.000104921135,0.9825984,0.015269939,0.000013203723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062996615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003852894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010269203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007082851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004575686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051389933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141357239","doi":"10.1515/til-2013-004","title":"The Montreal Protocol Protection of Ozone and Climate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Ozone layer; Greenhouse gas; Kyoto Protocol; Environmental science; Climate change; Environmental protection; Ozone; Treaty; Protocol (science); Natural resource economics; Meteorology; Political science; Geography; Ecology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.009596809917588154,"score_gpt":0.23024073032797623,"score_spread":0.22064392041038808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141357239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024326958,0.003201488,0.0056697503,0.020905487,0.002225517,0.00095096126,0.0048553185,0.00036630107,0.9593924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08032144,0.00825868,0.021614376,0.047139157,0.0017943203,0.003262279,0.005887582,0.0004733032,0.8312488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151003,0.0014226799,0.00042334505,0.0010573694,0.00405318,0.0015333223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949449,0.00069684716,0.00028426602,0.00092912687,0.0028166666,0.00032815192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006506412,0.001197149,0.00076020684,0.0022468688,0.0068529067,0.0066959686,0.0037810726,0.00953547,0.044390637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014065334,0.00077895884,0.0014507206,0.0019061473,0.0035762356,0.0027443236,0.0037380848,0.010473834,0.013927843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006006467,0.00005680326,0.0005279794,0.00016497406,0.000020527466,0.0002166408,0.00046170622,0.00035727007,0.0014968473,0.67960113,0.29950196,0.017534075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025871763,0.000029800149,0.0011347478,0.0001968433,0.000017627402,0.00005916195,0.00007542059,0.00016359959,0.0005434142,0.016816055,0.9808842,0.000053369116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38936576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31360942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38936576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011820042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04256139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7741988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154197270","doi":"10.1515/til-2013-009","title":"Differentiation in the Emerging Climate Regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Climate change; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Developing country; Kyoto Protocol; Convention; Conference of the parties; International community; Montreal Protocol; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Economic growth; Politics; Ecology; Law; Ozone layer","score_opus":0.05232735177005776,"score_gpt":0.2660323475270985,"score_spread":0.21370499575704072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154197270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20357788,0.0069901217,0.067867555,0.03133667,0.00045392293,0.00011965385,0.00020929407,0.00007522869,0.6893696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857077,0.0015456801,0.004693741,0.0016285166,0.00013380013,0.00005361238,0.000053631153,0.000015258953,0.0061680973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964993,0.0016262949,0.00017680517,0.00050725986,0.0006718438,0.00051850686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997449,0.00089175015,0.00047736752,0.0003704233,0.0004789549,0.00033243315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004240671,0.00019053355,0.00032772985,0.00073104934,0.0023025442,0.0035296534,0.0006461152,0.0016885037,0.0030547131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007229282,0.00012380944,0.0004534288,0.0008978846,0.010818974,0.004631215,0.0040033017,0.0038448572,0.00035069828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003822128,0.0000034294615,0.00035149566,0.000007702628,0.0000012235027,0.0000237658,0.00035288904,0.0002942376,0.00003782677,0.9967055,0.00021805888,0.0020001098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008175709,0.000014697383,0.0013985629,0.000066798195,0.0000028978259,0.000060069695,0.00064842834,0.0010279459,0.00010566163,0.97377217,0.022884512,0.000010085664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030208474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025075185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004240671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040926794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028126996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029694617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193824776","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0015","title":"Property’s Sovereignty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0480782264763015,"score_gpt":0.3631084027986167,"score_spread":0.3150301763223152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193824776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024538739,0.0026419938,0.038026884,0.02425461,0.00036345175,0.00006288695,0.00014874224,0.00006359725,0.90989906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619753,0.001439164,0.0046998914,0.0032464077,0.0005702403,0.00009904312,0.000108155495,0.00003419788,0.027827624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941766,0.0021059655,0.0003688125,0.0011859909,0.0014539,0.00070864934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99275255,0.0032210841,0.0005309672,0.0016065894,0.0014414099,0.00044730256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066886772,0.00026396263,0.00069980585,0.0013200935,0.003667402,0.008035894,0.0009988268,0.0035448659,0.009137631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009588391,0.00030413622,0.00067403825,0.0009351564,0.032994498,0.0075864084,0.0048828213,0.0058327727,0.0012271018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011739874,0.000001919219,0.000036430327,0.0000049208106,0.0000014488378,0.000011142711,0.00028398188,0.000041056588,0.000034711607,0.9983183,0.00048056472,0.0007842988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089899795,0.000013001469,0.00018349783,0.000060765786,0.0000052883142,0.000067034576,0.00018795545,0.00027718552,0.00012586066,0.94998825,0.049074207,0.000007918383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038474367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019186776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009137631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030519078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034531674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03537357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474951546","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0017","title":"Technological tattletales and constitutional black holes: communications intermediaries and constitutional constraints","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; State (computer science); Constraint (computer-aided design); Business; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.03281549725311105,"score_gpt":0.3141082639295648,"score_spread":0.28129276667645375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474951546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22509561,0.0024088845,0.21563289,0.05000191,0.00036247523,0.00021778121,0.00012667075,0.00022798324,0.5059258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99003464,0.00029339347,0.0042332993,0.0008116799,0.000071735194,0.000086131426,0.000015180758,0.00003307565,0.0044208895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987931,0.0061713653,0.0004881184,0.0020526028,0.0019125886,0.0014443034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97244745,0.016875008,0.0028228508,0.0054907734,0.0014865338,0.00087736204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014697411,0.0004008695,0.00056066987,0.0022068785,0.008611362,0.0151214795,0.002460019,0.0052937157,0.008915516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024411079,0.00063345133,0.00061196205,0.0017331211,0.11783026,0.025280507,0.012223472,0.0076573663,0.0005451028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028107604,0.0000029305631,0.00008833594,0.0000049074793,0.0000010096489,0.000031139756,0.001902167,0.00012483563,0.000032944732,0.9969914,0.0001352715,0.0006821953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130003045,0.000015582551,0.0002257204,0.00009135746,0.000006913944,0.00008746094,0.0033513892,0.0010003678,0.0003553755,0.97222733,0.022607783,0.00001768996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037616163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022804574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006193853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053194035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07772833},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2509696337","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0022","title":"Technological neutrality: recalibrating copyright in the information age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Normative; Law and economics; Technological change; Net neutrality; Jurisprudence; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; The Internet","score_opus":0.02550113929871186,"score_gpt":0.2383122564895001,"score_spread":0.21281111719078824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509696337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1940519,0.0036374587,0.2678456,0.047994487,0.0008920027,0.00015094923,0.00006969329,0.00024294641,0.48511484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822547,0.00074483576,0.010755453,0.0013334865,0.00025034283,0.00006919293,0.00001819282,0.000052573385,0.004521276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749781,0.014019713,0.0012559791,0.0021242818,0.006517201,0.0011048521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472781,0.029611114,0.0048737656,0.010393504,0.0065720608,0.0012713958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033032507,0.00041390123,0.0005057853,0.004406386,0.0042809495,0.01876967,0.0024147504,0.0053362483,0.0029151305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060063012,0.00035564875,0.00066237256,0.0017252227,0.07225035,0.028087009,0.010849043,0.0060664196,0.0006516479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041287553,0.0000064748797,0.00014647197,0.000015764243,0.0000023345917,0.000050797516,0.0043114824,0.00019503623,0.0001922756,0.99158305,0.0001500224,0.0033421621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072238804,0.000025960215,0.00029601713,0.00013432215,0.000009196225,0.00015437105,0.0030455166,0.0011099792,0.0008663422,0.9664157,0.027908133,0.000027301408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012758571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085127883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033032507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004739582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005178413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17469466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513990116","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0019","title":"Taking notice seriously: information delivery and consumer contract formation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Boilerplate text; Obligation; Normative; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.017812689208509157,"score_gpt":0.23763276570735953,"score_spread":0.21982007649885038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513990116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4484958,0.001983641,0.02561302,0.07835018,0.00026969105,0.00018936818,0.00008609126,0.00008335709,0.44492897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953804,0.00020514804,0.00072968483,0.00073439436,0.00006559615,0.0000136314875,0.000006664963,0.000008949456,0.0028555146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988356,0.0063701477,0.00060816284,0.0008229864,0.0026042054,0.0012385439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303953,0.05283831,0.009073124,0.0028504226,0.0030254333,0.001817354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01634317,0.00017532412,0.00024704836,0.0009562074,0.0036852714,0.008089558,0.00087924337,0.0045013125,0.012083582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05612746,0.00028666708,0.00030023084,0.0011093868,0.01150572,0.008391135,0.004007011,0.0040334295,0.00040555812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000181749,0.00019980325,0.0124918725,0.00009021104,0.000017104809,0.00071405666,0.02644494,0.00091641664,0.0007235183,0.9239246,0.002736031,0.031559706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013055275,0.00027647853,0.027286146,0.0003622456,0.00008211901,0.0005949314,0.039786056,0.0066923066,0.002459861,0.8376057,0.08459987,0.00012374156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011840996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008478434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01634317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006482395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072095217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08643204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514070696","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0016","title":"The policy battle over information and digital policy regulation: a canadian perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Public relations; Grassroots; Public policy; Influencer marketing; Legislation; Public interest; Political science; Business; Marketing; Politics","score_opus":0.007625764211486596,"score_gpt":0.3039728308897685,"score_spread":0.2963470666782819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514070696","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014942068,0.021780163,0.0020068816,0.6321858,0.0011323099,0.00007491213,0.00033465563,0.00007107096,0.32747203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7820899,0.03716108,0.004727496,0.0981139,0.0008652582,0.00008360652,0.00021900868,0.00012062325,0.07661901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781601,0.0043206187,0.00046041087,0.001670937,0.008017564,0.007370425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757455,0.009711959,0.00096227095,0.0005852691,0.008576657,0.0044182353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012549688,0.00082447,0.0009450655,0.006692483,0.047105137,0.03053017,0.0041477755,0.01342883,0.009640611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018311251,0.00066825794,0.0009823111,0.008290172,0.045109224,0.00782846,0.0053976844,0.012449213,0.0005715047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020165848,0.000022670476,0.00087916106,0.00014345438,0.000010315926,0.0002546137,0.0068659508,0.00057676807,0.0001346871,0.94523424,0.036944732,0.008913195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041224615,0.000027015712,0.0051884814,0.0012422875,0.00006657178,0.0001827768,0.03257875,0.0020527975,0.00046861975,0.13826938,0.819669,0.000212999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99602747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60972214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3902779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4733041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7071912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517679917","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0023","title":"Intellectual property, antitrust, and the rule of law: between private power and state power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tying; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Private law; Public law; Law; Competition law; Rule of law; Competition (biology); State (computer science); Economics; Power (physics); Politics; Political science; Monopoly; Market economy; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0462665861976401,"score_gpt":0.23636294406863326,"score_spread":0.19009635787099316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517679917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09997302,0.023342555,0.07533883,0.14350943,0.0008185697,0.000047582533,0.00009164394,0.00007205649,0.6568063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853057,0.002668605,0.0032465712,0.0024652886,0.00059370545,0.00003223569,0.000014688719,0.000018869541,0.0056542936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937674,0.0034768863,0.00021203984,0.0007228042,0.001297984,0.0005228818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841175,0.012604284,0.0010075102,0.0009806008,0.0009214282,0.000368662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076375287,0.00027581636,0.00063235476,0.0017866794,0.0042611575,0.01711352,0.0009691299,0.005569333,0.004002393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011492586,0.0003502484,0.00060009665,0.0017742654,0.056370016,0.015624642,0.004008231,0.006942911,0.0004442931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002149672,0.000003722066,0.00004927864,0.000004222257,8.738651e-7,0.000014781492,0.00026437634,0.000099647696,0.000015347323,0.9985158,0.00020162048,0.0008282313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048838706,0.0000074327804,0.00013857878,0.000059559323,0.0000028829213,0.00002345906,0.00040152273,0.0005453467,0.00006249715,0.9897776,0.008970516,0.0000056933154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049492465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029878505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01711352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065243565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045910296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04733771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737459881","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0013","title":"Property and Sovereignty: How to Tell the Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Politics; Stewardship (theology); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04499553625122221,"score_gpt":0.3274981946011386,"score_spread":0.2825026583499164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737459881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026706247,0.026076844,0.16601329,0.43625128,0.0057871332,0.00009874352,0.0004068269,0.00031367413,0.338346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202047,0.007981989,0.025849964,0.026858844,0.002585935,0.0001593441,0.0002425718,0.00025451556,0.015862133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868067,0.0087270895,0.00067774695,0.0013714994,0.0018513778,0.00056567806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95660305,0.03315588,0.0016689704,0.0039697965,0.0033959437,0.0012063538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015933815,0.00063882663,0.0015616844,0.0032927182,0.004865879,0.011796728,0.002822323,0.008561665,0.015346928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061424233,0.00066966633,0.00076249224,0.0022409023,0.06045348,0.04390896,0.00877394,0.014058531,0.002133391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012879867,0.000007358055,0.00014578464,0.000044221437,0.000008769546,0.00006555624,0.001734076,0.00019429046,0.000024954063,0.9880977,0.0047568697,0.0049075154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048934085,0.0000034263232,0.000051008097,0.000072677794,0.0000040014247,0.000040535437,0.0005312013,0.0003000326,0.000044561897,0.9831245,0.015816296,0.0000069332013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005639264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029221477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015933815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055184546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031226748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08426708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785381600","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0009","title":"Class Action Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Compensation (psychology); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Mechanism (biology); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.050430366174970855,"score_gpt":0.40489152223698555,"score_spread":0.35446115606201467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785381600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058019903,0.0005041609,0.006957121,0.008118672,0.00016817506,0.00012765845,0.00047738134,0.00004739905,0.9255794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96617246,0.00017793673,0.0009004269,0.0007579875,0.00008967338,0.000051918672,0.00014866874,0.000012190515,0.031688575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98879087,0.0027799238,0.0003041008,0.001068284,0.0049504433,0.0021063394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841817,0.0043331212,0.001514942,0.0021189996,0.005826591,0.0020245686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006890486,0.00034577414,0.000466669,0.0026520907,0.003879638,0.006869215,0.0014316583,0.0018579721,0.03199084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021695597,0.000121995065,0.00033218344,0.0018938386,0.0066109165,0.0030369963,0.0025700843,0.0015367182,0.0015326929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028726801,0.000052260963,0.017346688,0.0000511762,0.00003100127,0.00010749671,0.0021331492,0.00051065243,0.00019174254,0.93309844,0.010410158,0.036038525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005028563,0.00012467803,0.08927687,0.0005707681,0.00013682943,0.00042424482,0.009963977,0.0031990027,0.0008707902,0.4574671,0.4378301,0.00008536459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07254713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08634018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07254713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01272982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00891571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14424974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801021333","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0005","title":"Schrödinger’s Robot: Privacy in Uncertain States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Doctrine; Intervention (counseling); Internet privacy; Optimism; Computer science; Privacy law; Nothing; Computer security; Psychology; Information privacy; Artificial intelligence; Law; Privacy policy; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036516741908373146,"score_gpt":0.3865891889344925,"score_spread":0.3500724470261194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801021333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06225257,0.004793681,0.41001186,0.10683379,0.0009982028,0.00010599326,0.000446992,0.00023858504,0.41431832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96489555,0.0016764601,0.019264905,0.0023205506,0.00041837586,0.000100376885,0.00008670383,0.00003592446,0.011201194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968316,0.0017546375,0.00017509791,0.00035187035,0.00066697487,0.00021989654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99185735,0.0058806213,0.00057547976,0.00086037564,0.0006574217,0.00016869484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033827159,0.00029940705,0.00048936123,0.0007406771,0.0015936625,0.0031562317,0.00085691095,0.0033439952,0.006373797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014919098,0.00032026987,0.00071974454,0.00064235914,0.0120082265,0.0064856326,0.0030464067,0.00400606,0.0007439722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005050537,0.0000019473075,0.00005760432,0.000016493876,0.0000029300065,0.00006081154,0.00021444607,0.001341393,0.000062405816,0.99615306,0.0007598283,0.0013240771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005757177,0.0000050443796,0.000049996735,0.000018493996,0.0000023954367,0.000044950033,0.00005481832,0.00433925,0.00008242086,0.99164397,0.0037449754,0.000007910149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034189764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012990079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006373797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021566912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015179927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021322489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886905957","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0028","title":"Indigenous Peoples, Political Economists and the Tragedy of the Commons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Indigenous; Commons; Politics; Population; Environmental ethics; Natural resource; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.01912896356402754,"score_gpt":0.27922406251644105,"score_spread":0.2600950989524135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886905957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.166557,0.02278022,0.0038846936,0.28999758,0.0010130117,0.000024288864,0.00012268536,0.00004535218,0.5155752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94988316,0.0054027066,0.0005049209,0.0074431067,0.0005682343,0.000013765014,0.000014428583,0.000014546048,0.036155257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927586,0.00034251346,0.0000119756905,0.00004686835,0.00016777095,0.00015504533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979613,0.0012170322,0.00016030826,0.000065917426,0.00034998718,0.00024536886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015320386,0.00014932264,0.00014259575,0.0014500832,0.005459699,0.004017669,0.00048067485,0.0013905625,0.004820801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019466062,0.0000956141,0.00010156938,0.0011931236,0.01275986,0.0020128503,0.0013670563,0.0022249827,0.00018922475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006926653,0.000011807301,0.0009133788,0.000023677554,0.0000034212626,0.00008518049,0.004236994,0.00032973426,0.00003491092,0.9822521,0.009355808,0.0027460526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012513763,0.000013590507,0.00445599,0.00021196454,0.000009300504,0.00009708609,0.017581157,0.001632582,0.00015272781,0.6483138,0.3274958,0.000023398374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15918776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17549667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15918776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0129524395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049620895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31652236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911278515","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0003","title":"Re-reading Westin","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Anonymity; Information privacy; Reading (process); Privacy policy; Focus (optics); Privacy by Design; Control (management); Negotiation; Right to privacy; Curiosity; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026471485795455982,"score_gpt":0.33031660607444474,"score_spread":0.30384512027898875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911278515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005715537,0.019811623,0.014372163,0.74697524,0.023230346,0.00004943536,0.00014860646,0.00011522019,0.18958183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43544042,0.034730226,0.01164808,0.28230348,0.018734055,0.00033437493,0.00020156094,0.000655239,0.21595265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991964,0.0041247993,0.00025700228,0.001303752,0.0018508551,0.00049957645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875485,0.008823955,0.0003503337,0.00078301,0.0021278725,0.00036634493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629494,0.0008750111,0.0007213709,0.0020500517,0.006707316,0.010865336,0.0015840228,0.005968869,0.0060972446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018045435,0.00045251314,0.00046929246,0.0013911447,0.032074835,0.02135213,0.0043077427,0.016025614,0.0020957233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014512673,0.000015229325,0.0000829886,0.000047363603,0.0000026468183,0.00009389153,0.008792503,0.000110240726,0.00007993809,0.85178435,0.13028607,0.008690208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068237237,0.000013266033,0.000107123305,0.00042990452,0.0000051205093,0.000115229326,0.00455049,0.0003027039,0.00029740133,0.2835935,0.71055496,0.000023404364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00977886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007404345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010865336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072714053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051049744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052758038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912552388","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0011","title":"Theorizing Privacy in a Liberal Democracy: Canadian Jurisprudence, Anti-Terrorism, and Social Memory After 9/11","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberal democracy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Sociology; Terrorism; Right to privacy; Transparency (behavior); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.010594079133734356,"score_gpt":0.293567769427548,"score_spread":0.28297369029381364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912552388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.226448,0.0062795375,0.0088770315,0.19095512,0.00052812276,0.000106543266,0.00014429128,0.000051640593,0.5666096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99168676,0.00072896475,0.0004936639,0.002385795,0.00003578085,0.00002001859,0.000015006721,0.000014997164,0.0046189236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991147,0.0037360962,0.00017578443,0.0007362962,0.0021491179,0.002055715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98544365,0.00923022,0.00071039645,0.0008222926,0.0027445,0.0010488926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010332891,0.00051659,0.0004998561,0.003064754,0.04297865,0.019454906,0.0030898652,0.007867445,0.0041585914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016809525,0.00045890544,0.0005512896,0.003561573,0.12846135,0.011873283,0.01040829,0.01035844,0.00023502106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009468361,0.000009746642,0.00032731428,0.000016645345,0.0000027722351,0.00019738796,0.17590918,0.00019176304,0.000053282733,0.8188706,0.0021629254,0.0022489429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031474174,0.000023359928,0.0017322506,0.0004420492,0.000026820757,0.0001814611,0.28530666,0.0011414692,0.00037101615,0.5185099,0.19214071,0.00009279951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.853229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7811172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14677101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11067955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07006314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80304015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008109300","doi":"10.1515/til-2020-0002","title":"25 Years of Elder Law: An Integrative and Historical Account of the Field of Law and Aging","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Constructive; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Sociology; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.024428691493304896,"score_gpt":0.3279550088564711,"score_spread":0.3035263173631662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008109300","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21581607,0.37433562,0.0041800034,0.09502806,0.0031612287,0.000097459284,0.00014923974,0.000037844155,0.30719453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89776784,0.08257069,0.0007372388,0.0041354834,0.001320272,0.000057913403,0.000029191979,0.000011481128,0.01337001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975228,0.0016304186,0.00010476962,0.00016998977,0.00030760575,0.00026442925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644583,0.0022190579,0.00047078345,0.00008352081,0.0003233414,0.00045754653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046271896,0.00037012892,0.00029216395,0.003815951,0.0068414314,0.006880105,0.0007870353,0.0025929245,0.0022197023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004413083,0.00017747382,0.00017658545,0.0027401312,0.02264414,0.0065340507,0.0043271957,0.0034318767,0.0001545631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008032954,0.000048866885,0.0018222927,0.00010777483,0.0000036847405,0.0005692123,0.22220764,0.00011577492,0.000089199566,0.75301355,0.0069372766,0.015076726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039717997,0.00007283112,0.0065897196,0.0017877974,0.000007938998,0.0007696701,0.1641974,0.00023681692,0.00015315237,0.06630417,0.7598387,0.00003784437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011327224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018411987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011327224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004356564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05398923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089303589","doi":"10.1515/til-2020-0015","title":"Territorial Justice in Israel/Palestine","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Palestine; Compromise; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04675035597196315,"score_gpt":0.3338797192303954,"score_spread":0.28712936325843225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089303589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62960273,0.0024558955,0.0010758435,0.008752633,0.000094263756,0.000027164793,0.00002041297,0.000010738,0.35796028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971699,0.00011142516,0.00005855566,0.00027109243,0.000009301804,0.0000029265432,0.0000029515309,0.0000010764909,0.0023727566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986179,0.0006471934,0.000035515717,0.00009115299,0.00016187661,0.00044641102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994578,0.00020659433,0.000096828444,0.00004115519,0.00009953693,0.00009816942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002335157,0.00012417005,0.00024403403,0.0006429796,0.0086975265,0.0043916046,0.00055397145,0.0015580847,0.0039983955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016192178,0.00009661965,0.00009161509,0.00070832716,0.017888026,0.0013560983,0.0038150302,0.0014424551,0.00026736018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029688981,0.000056259145,0.006891717,0.000049419126,0.000009076987,0.0012693553,0.07428581,0.0003368423,0.00055655674,0.89637685,0.0028743912,0.017264046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053333733,0.00017194,0.030349337,0.0007560358,0.000021871949,0.0014610001,0.3773574,0.0012991931,0.001522747,0.23964007,0.3473102,0.000056897912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016692098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027340423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016692098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047856877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031686423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034722745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121641526","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1198","title":"Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dignity; Religious law; Family law; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Arbitration; Allegiance; Sociology; Israeli law; Identity (music); Religious identity; Political science; Private sphere; Public sphere; Private law; Islam; Public law; Religiosity; Black letter law","score_opus":0.03512001175155976,"score_gpt":0.2922466806274343,"score_spread":0.25712666887587454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121641526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052903425,0.018864166,0.006254135,0.93832755,0.0026252898,0.000024746105,0.000023902361,0.0000302546,0.028559625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47323087,0.025933983,0.0130009195,0.44212386,0.018308628,0.00023777969,0.000030739375,0.00021699385,0.02691624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857465,0.010343175,0.00036691272,0.0011539642,0.001597603,0.00079199875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825951,0.0140417125,0.00048099906,0.0009723006,0.0013804452,0.00052944775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017947963,0.0005870764,0.0008442079,0.001578486,0.0124609545,0.010830309,0.004102019,0.01707688,0.002025984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027328333,0.00048046318,0.0010881025,0.0011481844,0.059589043,0.024010073,0.0072764982,0.020260852,0.00068861886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001797061,0.00001598804,0.00031043307,0.000066240464,0.000010497639,0.0004238535,0.025921466,0.00020308088,0.00007669474,0.9239921,0.0407808,0.008180965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003847679,0.000030025858,0.0003929764,0.00051151944,0.000008963429,0.00046347053,0.012670787,0.00058535865,0.00017531183,0.70682997,0.2782354,0.00005776293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02055742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020775447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02055742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006097426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050019356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094919026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122093128","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1253","title":"Ordinary People, Necessary Choices: A Comparative Study of Childcare Expenses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legislature; Flexibility (engineering); Tax deduction; Context (archaeology); Baseline (sea); Variety (cybernetics); Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Order (exchange); Actuarial science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gross income; Tax reform; Computer science; Management; Finance; State income tax","score_opus":0.029280073424633273,"score_gpt":0.3613706878434686,"score_spread":0.3320906144188353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122093128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167355,0.0016222555,0.0005060181,0.0010589709,0.000014067416,0.000023362183,0.00013806284,0.0000020795735,0.07989976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771774,0.00063038565,0.0001867462,0.00011900268,0.0000075172993,0.000013254082,0.000076806435,0.0000033468039,0.0012452235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625564,0.0019424158,0.00009915181,0.00020638896,0.00094202976,0.00055431883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933503,0.0046310797,0.0008561241,0.00017558981,0.0006653102,0.00032163467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022063334,0.00011739884,0.00039900347,0.0032512627,0.0039705704,0.003057587,0.0006138199,0.00079019455,0.006256698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009186316,0.00014192724,0.00025937453,0.0052921064,0.0049394052,0.0033475142,0.0023696271,0.0011656525,0.00013418042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032700613,0.00039950057,0.100239016,0.00033027676,0.00014249259,0.0018937109,0.22218493,0.0012201556,0.00063495646,0.6186171,0.004614986,0.049395908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006482226,0.0002662289,0.3454642,0.0005137507,0.0000828089,0.0007568203,0.5130692,0.0009283595,0.00064945343,0.03701349,0.10112554,0.00006528086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076197684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17016105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076197684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008508785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020707657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15150833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123715249","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1259","title":"Tax Levels, Structures, and Reforms: Convergence or Persistence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Globalization; Tax competition; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Tax revenue; Ad valorem tax; Convergence (economics); Direct tax; International economics; Market economy; Public economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03215570590205604,"score_gpt":0.2716658884045457,"score_spread":0.23951018250248965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123715249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75152516,0.028466647,0.013091214,0.03758007,0.00021673446,0.000116397576,0.00092329516,0.00013345863,0.16794695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924239,0.0031386327,0.0010520736,0.0006234138,0.00024126237,0.000030780287,0.0002461281,0.00002706504,0.0022168644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542505,0.0017370662,0.00031146256,0.00088628056,0.0009472814,0.00069282384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98198545,0.006827991,0.0059781275,0.0015566073,0.002449526,0.0012022416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006369833,0.0002040665,0.000940838,0.0065861456,0.0012641251,0.009158642,0.0009817437,0.0015170708,0.0060895653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027194941,0.0002655018,0.00052257336,0.008261231,0.008367668,0.011857361,0.0059226356,0.0026942103,0.0006784022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002759361,0.00022764955,0.31275722,0.0004135908,0.00032612152,0.00025812633,0.0122692,0.0041586743,0.00031098735,0.49523318,0.004215517,0.1695538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009209624,0.00037223534,0.51897156,0.0012509098,0.00020364104,0.00063406443,0.029141314,0.008216244,0.0009017589,0.3823335,0.0577501,0.00013256067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024873104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019836144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009158642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003301757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017720914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033687294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125020779","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0011","title":"Informal Workers’ Aggregation and Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Workforce; Informal sector; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Informal education; Business; Sociology; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03575435948051943,"score_gpt":0.3792886883178452,"score_spread":0.34353432883732576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125020779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33534846,0.0052814246,0.015845895,0.04323037,0.0006191142,0.00025186874,0.00015138327,0.00023132842,0.5990401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97714955,0.0005632681,0.0010372107,0.0021319226,0.00019815064,0.00007514375,0.000026806976,0.00002278014,0.01879525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991008,0.0020584636,0.00048973155,0.0014472802,0.0026944077,0.0023022522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99020517,0.0038669023,0.0017502526,0.0017786495,0.0012330136,0.0011660041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066565415,0.00028554216,0.00038732748,0.0020894113,0.013630898,0.009562122,0.0016366084,0.0032696708,0.0057268953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012796969,0.00041320975,0.00044487073,0.0018057576,0.028763073,0.0037545788,0.011663626,0.0043759085,0.00061815314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016587328,0.00004055067,0.0107312035,0.00007035439,0.000012413623,0.0005005279,0.04528723,0.00033554333,0.00028121582,0.9060587,0.007728585,0.02893716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043428605,0.00009194774,0.037228398,0.000724848,0.000041476953,0.00060520676,0.040155724,0.001448683,0.0005659182,0.44416505,0.47482693,0.000102346654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030254481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025966698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030254481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008385225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008676498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060839355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125806982","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1000","title":"Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Tort; Political science; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029359555964043813,"score_gpt":0.3850370660161229,"score_spread":0.3556775100520791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125806982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010511727,0.010359965,0.26314038,0.024185194,0.0014540872,0.00021004463,0.00009146264,0.00026734264,0.68977976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8460099,0.005176599,0.04997512,0.008546245,0.0019728339,0.00043875506,0.000063611806,0.00021566683,0.08760115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988059,0.0030961996,0.0005053453,0.0017518955,0.005434487,0.0011530578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438184,0.002197701,0.0006197748,0.0015925698,0.00091269996,0.0002954677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074906033,0.0011719698,0.0010035058,0.002148716,0.00413768,0.008768057,0.0029722843,0.009140892,0.00639788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009743711,0.00058064016,0.0012123724,0.0011989065,0.039302498,0.0122690685,0.007085558,0.009214379,0.0009778744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016045702,0.000004021697,0.000017440043,0.000007803158,0.0000015865829,0.000016420538,0.00009144362,0.00022295362,0.000037243903,0.9977582,0.0003661654,0.0014750923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053201857,0.0000128505435,0.00008442865,0.00004894727,0.00000641075,0.0000753296,0.00007119484,0.00050246035,0.00014271494,0.97859794,0.020438455,0.000013897746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024947408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032395488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009140892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00605617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046063485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043940842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126088849","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1019","title":"Correlativity, Personality, and the Emerging Consensus on Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028136906328389607,"score_gpt":0.3426470481351979,"score_spread":0.3145101418068083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126088849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060569886,0.11291615,0.043406777,0.62886006,0.0049354085,0.000029228308,0.00007026594,0.0001163239,0.14909591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88846016,0.04495912,0.011150292,0.04446101,0.0042329663,0.00007550573,0.00006900427,0.00011443344,0.006477411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97760916,0.010378446,0.0011536814,0.0036078724,0.006054589,0.0011963104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631551,0.026358854,0.0021638419,0.0024855898,0.004232213,0.0016044194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02867957,0.00059285795,0.0012908119,0.004201236,0.0065503456,0.011804763,0.0033224344,0.0094016185,0.0024149294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025288593,0.00032078323,0.00071426213,0.0024592,0.056334265,0.017619817,0.0076871854,0.015253225,0.0004562065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012750761,0.000011435531,0.00026959673,0.00008685919,0.0000070422366,0.000059677746,0.0063278913,0.00019061599,0.00005063351,0.9728252,0.002665556,0.017492535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066860543,0.000017137907,0.00047406746,0.00043640504,0.000004884364,0.00008586411,0.0064406716,0.00034040166,0.00011317396,0.95151937,0.040535692,0.000025765275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022494935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018433875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02867957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008386602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071808784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15167385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231325389","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1169","title":"Closing the Gap","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Luck; Epistemology; Action (physics); Inference; Philosophy; Rest (music); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05008031918610636,"score_gpt":0.3192618937435698,"score_spread":0.26918157455746344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231325389","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001233008,0.0401127,0.0023014518,0.8079146,0.038156655,0.000014290679,0.00029826874,0.00014552019,0.10982352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10033756,0.06378477,0.004164569,0.6437743,0.05003523,0.00018826859,0.00097038655,0.0010304532,0.13571456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993856,0.0023401363,0.0002514085,0.0011232932,0.001386128,0.001042967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851173,0.007911553,0.00054741156,0.0012595654,0.0022861548,0.002878086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009420057,0.0007484269,0.0012499915,0.0017787708,0.0063840426,0.01377295,0.0026336599,0.013171082,0.099287406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027070345,0.0003099733,0.00066552125,0.0018549381,0.011433296,0.025884211,0.0120175425,0.020087644,0.02028789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003419161,0.000030992796,0.00017358387,0.0002631452,0.000007933327,0.00011665735,0.0018163559,0.000060232444,0.00007080526,0.43526226,0.5162756,0.045888286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050544554,0.000006240051,0.00012557718,0.00040522232,0.0000019080383,0.00006729935,0.001339558,0.00002847303,0.000024024535,0.07771848,0.9202717,0.0000063799075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027659158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028588588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099287406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005229132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010063522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33214945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290766374","doi":"10.1515/til-2022-0015","title":"Bilateral labor agreements as migration governance tools: An analysis from a gender lens","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Gender equality; Work (physics); Human rights; Political science; Inequality; Gender inequality; Gender diversity; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Law; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.041082460714554854,"score_gpt":0.3428963459407654,"score_spread":0.30181388522621055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290766374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49163404,0.0036299648,0.040565345,0.011701092,0.00012404277,0.00024943458,0.0009829726,0.00009072817,0.4510224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887671,0.00066295016,0.0033028452,0.0002955941,0.000026458287,0.00012776462,0.00012095531,0.000025725674,0.0066707786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907946,0.00606017,0.00023052526,0.00047559082,0.0013101075,0.0011290064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98946065,0.00665355,0.0017565555,0.0006882275,0.0010163793,0.00042465047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009164702,0.0002550283,0.00030449397,0.0035498836,0.0030647598,0.0064388127,0.00092617434,0.0010272958,0.014614805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015870767,0.00019285444,0.0003610668,0.006010483,0.0062739057,0.00629688,0.0049666427,0.0014813014,0.00049761933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026367843,0.000023150986,0.01308578,0.000107528125,0.000009747519,0.00013441835,0.030986877,0.0006486217,0.0002004322,0.9336365,0.0013421444,0.019798407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032795382,0.000098397075,0.050604396,0.0015579053,0.000054747838,0.00034263314,0.22900598,0.0055708913,0.0007396995,0.40272442,0.30922678,0.000041405958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006348245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007930191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014614805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004937385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037937614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048891366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321602674","doi":"10.1515/til-2023-0011","title":"Good faith in employment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Scope (computer science); Business; Law; Bad faith; Transformative learning; Political science; Good faith; Sociology","score_opus":0.02533934397680164,"score_gpt":0.25463574732860367,"score_spread":0.22929640335180201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321602674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050194867,0.003580428,0.02080451,0.06550339,0.00052429544,0.00005742479,0.000035585377,0.00004338211,0.8592561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972291,0.0006625943,0.0009939332,0.0031720563,0.00016213696,0.000027766391,0.0000083058185,0.000014445089,0.022667762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925,0.0041411007,0.00023557452,0.0005709454,0.0013084372,0.0012438952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910158,0.0051092645,0.00075397774,0.0012171039,0.0009536818,0.0009500947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007280467,0.00022595472,0.00030713342,0.0010547609,0.0061870646,0.0078139845,0.0009819584,0.004126909,0.0072435713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013386374,0.00025804527,0.0003344523,0.0006453241,0.049890183,0.0052915593,0.007409264,0.004902711,0.00084585056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003047322,0.000006737055,0.000197945,0.000008343481,8.7517645e-7,0.000049706665,0.0026567308,0.00007560836,0.000027429482,0.9928416,0.0011260828,0.0030058487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076018578,0.000020770722,0.0006048229,0.00021541555,0.0000032174357,0.00014875305,0.0044606864,0.0003407197,0.00015865336,0.91083527,0.08319223,0.000011886299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043768557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034782686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078139845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038998057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004371629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03850329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W577197919","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0004","title":"Organizing: Should the Employer Have a Say?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Freedom of association; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Labour law; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.042896892642980015,"score_gpt":0.3436806157805566,"score_spread":0.30078372313757656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W577197919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08574094,0.006223088,0.0065489616,0.24894087,0.0028529563,0.00005140392,0.000066533925,0.000051159783,0.6495241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90990746,0.0024207302,0.0009840601,0.037349217,0.0013179028,0.000044421868,0.000056288332,0.000035875186,0.04788402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619687,0.0015545376,0.00010838081,0.00043247564,0.0007641256,0.00094361504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669003,0.001772384,0.00032587926,0.00024507265,0.00043523658,0.0005313467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047332905,0.0002284716,0.0002727713,0.0004825665,0.008685706,0.008222598,0.0008711826,0.0057689594,0.006347367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075626145,0.00021453235,0.00027031676,0.00043593446,0.012429566,0.0039391997,0.0023546182,0.00434364,0.0014632521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028970548,0.00005634069,0.002792834,0.00008206869,0.0000073389906,0.00037985653,0.019229352,0.00013151285,0.00044552048,0.9123943,0.030972503,0.033479486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028129703,0.00008227626,0.0053686434,0.00054959254,0.000020430825,0.00034556614,0.066447966,0.00027984238,0.0009472147,0.29259676,0.6332862,0.000047403075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064709256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0130668245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008685706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032413523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049349237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025032341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886156249","doi":"10.1515/til-2024-0021","title":"Imagining how U.S. federalism would affect third-party funding regulation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Government (linguistics); Legalization; Enforcement; Commission; State (computer science); Accountability; Normative; Federal law","score_opus":0.04278326659619959,"score_gpt":0.28256914219585066,"score_spread":0.2397858755996511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886156249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70954007,0.0013373992,0.0030647418,0.10651001,0.00039489003,0.000093873525,0.0003853199,0.000043689106,0.17862988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934946,0.00021071185,0.00034479625,0.0045192637,0.000057548525,0.000026387266,0.000030397085,0.0000058661603,0.0013104569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923334,0.003545292,0.00024127074,0.0006657745,0.0015147078,0.0016995709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96096605,0.023276899,0.0073795915,0.0013805818,0.0050096796,0.0019872244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015226362,0.00017643027,0.0003069961,0.0013785254,0.0045914263,0.006484742,0.00082383706,0.00299793,0.0066301967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03860362,0.00022769374,0.00084775395,0.001749936,0.005748153,0.0035845921,0.0026452118,0.0039757504,0.00040840716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003373054,0.000507997,0.23900996,0.00012644334,0.00015835698,0.0005886097,0.009878891,0.0057468303,0.0013445542,0.6810818,0.02439452,0.036824748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024688186,0.001000244,0.4452709,0.0009467406,0.00064466277,0.00025460098,0.045063343,0.0097051505,0.0056312126,0.33379412,0.15719359,0.00024868367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042156115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057098158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042156115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010393262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007840391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083821476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}