{"meta":{"query_hash":"3c8d0691dc6b","filters":{"venue":"Theoretical Linguistics"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3c8d0691dc6b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Theoretical+Linguistics"},"results":[{"id":"W1988392427","doi":"10.1515/thli.29.3.263","title":"Is the meta-language really natural?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indexicality; Computer science; Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Demonstrative; Simple (philosophy); Natural language; Subject (documents); Philosophy of language; Semantic property; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Philosophy; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Programming language","score_opus":0.02697957168907204,"score_gpt":0.2634736818004412,"score_spread":0.23649411011136914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988392427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035014187,0.0007351307,0.0015624041,0.013720607,0.007973995,0.00046748517,0.00012698915,0.00029073507,0.9716212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892478,0.00001264786,0.0016462561,0.0022588456,0.0033710643,0.000013555664,0.000017274662,0.0000470075,0.0033855431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824864,0.00022225818,0.00042487253,0.00029619024,0.0004134397,0.00039460076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974593,0.0011181663,0.00013367368,0.00060318504,0.00059291,0.000092785696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088746013,0.00026128034,0.00035343587,0.00005287124,0.00043609363,0.00026680698,0.0003422649,0.000073025316,0.009325381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02287664,0.00015778365,0.00023138268,0.000053522712,0.0011371081,0.000015191231,0.000052652045,0.00035731468,0.00041958914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011602112,0.000043445867,0.000006593471,0.00001592615,0.0002966285,0.000014533719,0.021701198,0.0000013939284,0.0000080173895,0.9769507,0.0008763505,0.000073612624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016862185,0.000040307863,0.000008199584,0.000011636927,0.0012293999,0.0000046072682,0.002579616,0.00060189114,0.0005604911,0.9068285,0.08772351,0.00024321604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011337301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006753174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003246004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000529928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99158025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159060141","doi":"10.1515/thli.2009.007","title":"The lexical category debate in Salish and its relevance for Tagalog","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tagalog; Linguistics; Noun; Verb; Relevance (law); Computer science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.020340330702820698,"score_gpt":0.25938872206124974,"score_spread":0.23904839135842904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159060141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1620885,0.003425994,0.01010101,0.10924244,0.022737816,0.004342986,0.0006613401,0.0009897532,0.6864101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957843,0.00007559852,0.00039954513,0.00063229696,0.0027202193,0.000012632933,0.000021411603,0.000021855221,0.00033213352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987554,0.00006472693,0.0003913964,0.0002435398,0.00017251827,0.0003724488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721324,0.0020174365,0.00008132813,0.0001952616,0.00041106917,0.00008164706],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006539575,0.00016170382,0.0002271989,0.000051837796,0.0003757425,0.00019910338,0.00018530819,0.00008233847,0.000062763895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028313246,0.00011985254,0.000045929195,0.000034912067,0.00060608535,0.000016466702,0.00003185048,0.00020280966,0.000016025822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009109547,0.000044391978,0.000011485751,0.00001556166,0.000010426999,0.0000071822333,0.0035875281,0.000005977471,0.000011803079,0.9950199,0.00015977462,0.0010348543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031358303,0.00013723255,0.00015960418,0.00003652442,0.000057443205,0.0000013558029,0.00033769972,0.017783156,0.00007539483,0.9589877,0.021937788,0.00017247828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022008406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014582434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8336958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000367076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003567823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9798717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259513452","doi":"10.1515/tl-2015-0008","title":"Stratified reference: the common core of distributivity, aspect, and measurement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Distributivity; Core (optical fiber); Mathematics; Computer science; Telecommunications; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.11002835191169034,"score_gpt":0.2891399240936449,"score_spread":0.17911157218195456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259513452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17287281,0.0003103658,0.003704034,0.007674724,0.004857152,0.0009184663,0.0006850783,0.00022483584,0.80875254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825853,0.000005138432,0.00020879137,0.000058108388,0.0013651974,0.000004408447,0.000032159052,0.00001556216,0.000052086598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985371,0.000110328205,0.00038109833,0.00017337484,0.0005920759,0.00020600665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976428,0.00042841106,0.0001556313,0.000327401,0.0013323996,0.00011331918],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012836115,0.00015430695,0.00026047777,0.000027340726,0.00016811753,0.00010783472,0.00020215867,0.00006138068,0.00018897411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012550793,0.00010432132,0.000033794004,0.000030065445,0.0015610538,0.00001016919,0.000101366895,0.00021807935,0.000017257864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050308714,0.00007867295,0.00029528487,0.000027907263,0.00003046745,0.0000034514899,0.005619664,0.0000019286672,0.0000132489995,0.9934527,0.00021639105,0.000209928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029511904,0.00017307658,0.00033131402,0.000049861108,0.00013572915,0.0000017064322,0.0022128369,0.0011771582,0.00026595962,0.9912976,0.0039187977,0.00014083541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028269997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041332477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82538575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005247382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009128342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99576694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416108023","doi":"10.1515/tl-2025-2011","title":"Mapping the pragmatic field: in how many ways?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Linguistics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint John Regional Hospital; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Focus (optics); Syntax; Field (mathematics); Empirical research","score_opus":0.03310870120737721,"score_gpt":0.28330825986893304,"score_spread":0.25019955866155585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416108023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034222296,0.00038945032,0.0029548747,0.00920053,0.0006634403,0.00021188076,0.000010318861,0.00008330221,0.983064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951542,0.00002608412,0.00041662526,0.0012872821,0.00045461755,0.000022344075,0.000008371413,0.00001018394,0.0026202921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917066,0.00012850943,0.00022501312,0.00012493269,0.00013309832,0.00021778634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791473,0.001326352,0.000051717616,0.00053770805,0.00014369318,0.000025820264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004268323,0.00011990322,0.00016139992,0.00008520876,0.00022847793,0.00032319824,0.00049058,0.000048209036,0.00092974084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003716646,0.00007764643,0.00004859155,0.00007993481,0.000886592,0.000020587862,0.00014709975,0.00032601107,0.000043667493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007106382,0.000036443136,0.000030779232,0.00004136796,0.000016283422,0.0000049773116,0.012046669,0.0000025259533,0.0000028488605,0.98511237,0.0021598034,0.00053880375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001578733,0.000017249104,0.00004606259,0.00014106485,0.000021679269,4.7016667e-7,0.021244666,0.0010376761,0.00004387765,0.8412396,0.13593853,0.000111283945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003031387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010059213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99173194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002342192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050501894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}