{"meta":{"query_hash":"cbe19701d05d","filters":{"venue":"Theoria & praxis"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cbe19701d05d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Theoria+%26+praxis"},"results":[{"id":"W1513858770","doi":"","title":"The Problem of Nature’s Spectral Haunting of Hegelian Subjectivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria & praxis","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Subjectivity; Materiality (auditing); Philosophy; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Dialectic; Interpretation (philosophy); Aesthetics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.004922061375872112,"score_gpt":0.2689201754252239,"score_spread":0.2639981140493518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513858770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22296846,0.007907061,0.050631523,0.051459502,0.0011976425,0.000033560136,0.00006549972,0.00020067127,0.66553605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857647,0.00091649295,0.0016604977,0.0012198628,0.00025341226,0.000024915475,0.000014342658,0.00006618576,0.010079774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782526,0.0011672974,0.000048154256,0.00028931902,0.00044465362,0.00022533778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978073,0.0014396204,0.00017562637,0.00031669356,0.00015399022,0.00010679273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027085661,0.0003589761,0.00045453533,0.0012788372,0.0046863016,0.006350592,0.0009353777,0.0017891582,0.0022769126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046475995,0.00027407473,0.00034999437,0.00068533816,0.068199575,0.008481513,0.0051043155,0.0041283416,0.00042757072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073248602,0.000004014707,0.00009778316,0.000014950568,0.0000021806236,0.000038309532,0.017390074,0.00006167918,0.00012366658,0.9793017,0.0006834296,0.0022750623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007193479,0.000012853614,0.00021921514,0.000068708876,0.0000034685816,0.00014234039,0.010063368,0.0001296568,0.00038942602,0.9522478,0.036707666,0.000008400915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015363876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017136812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006350592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003757905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002276817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027265668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542887716","doi":"","title":"The Idea of Human Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria & praxis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Right to property; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Law; Linguistic rights; Sociology; Political science; Charter; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029699377863020345,"score_gpt":0.34889359050768104,"score_spread":0.3191942126446607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542887716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045000245,0.045844518,0.022698877,0.07929587,0.0028452748,0.00008322672,0.00016642988,0.00010824161,0.8444575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6804958,0.05044068,0.017045336,0.050869193,0.00900183,0.00062617275,0.0002794892,0.00030660542,0.19093488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885805,0.006248327,0.00038054457,0.0017007082,0.0021252255,0.0009646784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995193,0.0026444404,0.0004529477,0.00083974004,0.00042210205,0.0004477405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061227004,0.0010380677,0.000870849,0.0024597263,0.0065023196,0.015029443,0.001861316,0.007084806,0.01100476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006430786,0.00039169026,0.0007559431,0.0024253132,0.07927091,0.017641554,0.008546553,0.0098686945,0.0030821415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016159091,0.0000020613224,0.000020628557,0.000019888981,0.0000013245702,0.00001166541,0.0009157377,0.000023098282,0.000015246605,0.9940805,0.0029447502,0.0019635104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004526272,0.000011421948,0.00007793034,0.0002086467,0.0000026670873,0.00007975619,0.0009370688,0.00007323754,0.00004843052,0.7147596,0.28378764,0.000009059362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004065204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00224653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015029443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074191038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006372079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05382967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556432547","doi":"","title":"On the Concept of Globality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria & praxis","topic":"Global Economic and Social Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Globality; Interdependence; Praxis; Politics; Convergence (economics); Epistemology; Globalization; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Political economy; Social science; Economics; Philosophy; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.04652030979590878,"score_gpt":0.23145629493998027,"score_spread":0.1849359851440715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556432547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013562029,0.05007274,0.024394047,0.22293234,0.0079413615,0.00007412547,0.00019919733,0.000119944474,0.68070424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75056964,0.059285693,0.014138613,0.09552395,0.013875966,0.0004228935,0.0002843077,0.00048341157,0.06541551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580306,0.0022643844,0.000102479054,0.00062794826,0.0007701536,0.00043195664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953557,0.0030615735,0.00030894735,0.00051969144,0.00042483304,0.0003292751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048536984,0.00081166596,0.0007813173,0.0025248877,0.0047394605,0.010304565,0.0014145687,0.0031898667,0.00649614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061483774,0.00025485063,0.000660636,0.0022614594,0.06274175,0.0160891,0.007972717,0.010490428,0.0013721511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017678909,0.0000021092017,0.000037647857,0.00001725332,0.0000018407453,0.000015457003,0.001104502,0.00004696106,0.000010603674,0.9934455,0.0038570326,0.0014592864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037390303,0.000006020115,0.00012112396,0.000118770215,0.0000029738733,0.00004864633,0.0012171108,0.000090908536,0.000024288522,0.88868994,0.109669074,0.0000073872066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002316446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017289716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010304565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004181982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003073448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03034252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953458239","doi":"","title":"Preface: Theoria and Praxis: The History and Theory of Subjectivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria & praxis","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Subjectivity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02141899317460553,"score_gpt":0.28095643277698296,"score_spread":0.2595374396023774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953458239","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008014965,0.077920556,0.006700169,0.25412712,0.5798298,0.00016845604,0.0013589194,0.00021570073,0.07887775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033416837,0.049896367,0.0034282275,0.08516436,0.6592667,0.0004199713,0.0013908622,0.00060459896,0.16641197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985709,0.00061651546,0.00010830982,0.00026293762,0.00038476987,0.000056534183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849185,0.009136493,0.0005564356,0.0006655668,0.0037672424,0.0009557127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026696536,0.0012282776,0.00086089043,0.0029991898,0.003880567,0.0065847486,0.0015936944,0.0030298478,0.032145318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022884168,0.00031905482,0.00062244554,0.0034640837,0.00477348,0.0065350165,0.0021136717,0.012041866,0.011533243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014525216,0.000012157634,0.00005498519,0.00018733238,0.0000034554746,0.000024201365,0.00031690233,0.00007519033,0.00007474164,0.03366374,0.95767766,0.007895081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013415272,0.000019265779,0.0006263959,0.00064412504,0.0000073658953,0.00009456569,0.00055861665,0.00023204208,0.00009827566,0.03594832,0.961736,0.000021631226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008766677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069480743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032145318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045010196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036259675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10753679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141354968","doi":"","title":"Taking Tragic Measures? Disability Studies’ Anti-Metrology and the Government of Thalidomide","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria & praxis","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Thalidomide; Subjectivity; Disability studies; Subject (documents); Narrative; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Criticism; Epistemology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Medicine; Philosophy; Law; Gender studies; Social science; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03501478813116073,"score_gpt":0.34651751965456745,"score_spread":0.31150273152340674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141354968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48480263,0.007873423,0.0039175176,0.1705877,0.0005606829,0.000045252476,0.000031762607,0.000028455937,0.33215252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937312,0.0006986136,0.00013633721,0.0015133129,0.000067322864,0.0000114242275,0.0000039391,0.000006006668,0.0038319016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885366,0.008785712,0.00016766858,0.0005237697,0.0008433258,0.0011429429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98986256,0.0073644347,0.0010443366,0.0006271307,0.00045779764,0.0006437439],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012096322,0.00032817008,0.0003044002,0.0018089827,0.015016815,0.010311365,0.001010363,0.0042929077,0.004415596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013210795,0.00019037502,0.000207985,0.0013916376,0.06255515,0.01128536,0.0077035595,0.004391421,0.00025026692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009322852,0.00002147392,0.0007046385,0.000024059995,0.0000026506852,0.0001235826,0.24512123,0.000046595553,0.000096943106,0.74623066,0.0019368241,0.0056820866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023534778,0.00005264469,0.0020700507,0.00038127726,0.000011495965,0.00031922047,0.4904607,0.00026239848,0.0005824422,0.26879752,0.23701113,0.000027579648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008627832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008189971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008184697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004369257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063972175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769862417","doi":"","title":"Preface: Should We Be Afraid of Jacques Derrida?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria & praxis","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Narrative; Epistemology; Philosophy; Simplicity; Simple (philosophy); Order (exchange); Humanism; Resistance (ecology); Economic Justice; Aesthetics; Law; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.13146652122882374,"score_gpt":0.329485061719547,"score_spread":0.19801854049072326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769862417","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013820156,0.037065428,0.0010694009,0.59269977,0.33021465,0.000055070832,0.00030136236,0.00011621086,0.03709612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.075021915,0.032797545,0.0015132908,0.23714083,0.25418702,0.00015978675,0.00047119745,0.00048512575,0.39822334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924564,0.00024603447,0.000037433056,0.00019904744,0.00020142602,0.00007048219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603915,0.0012272941,0.00018669214,0.000111856374,0.001664234,0.0007708579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015670821,0.00076300977,0.00066703436,0.00080042373,0.0045772805,0.004050135,0.00083058665,0.0030174358,0.027068028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009868029,0.0002535356,0.00036788773,0.0005320333,0.0022616617,0.0041616214,0.0015558721,0.010904934,0.010969676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019260417,0.0000069785688,0.000119990786,0.000067114575,0.0000023267141,0.00009312046,0.000648301,0.000025053045,0.00011509496,0.005383772,0.98897356,0.0045454483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003181372,0.000010352135,0.00040847954,0.00018670085,0.0000026373996,0.00022736222,0.0012567766,0.000062402134,0.0000936943,0.0029537212,0.9947832,0.0000114347295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006925577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008287212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027068028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032197621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019639828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090551555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}