{"meta":{"query_hash":"af8761afb470","filters":{"venue":"Theory and Decision"},"cohort_total":23,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":23,"exported":23,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af8761afb470","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Theory+and+Decision"},"results":[{"id":"W1555008460","doi":"10.1007/s11238-017-9597-9","title":"Conditional expected utility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Preference; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Decision theory; Separable space; Utility theory; Representation theorem; Preference theory; Conditional probability; Consistency (knowledge bases); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.15982006671841248,"score_gpt":0.45042826275737896,"score_spread":0.2906081960389665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555008460","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067682885,0.001544807,0.78791213,0.0052890168,0.00037981686,0.0001658714,0.0017752374,0.00045884334,0.13479145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91884506,0.0011731467,0.037015185,0.0005685605,0.00031636015,0.0001630296,0.00093369256,0.00008859008,0.04089637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982577,0.00073210755,0.00007259161,0.00031084317,0.0003884569,0.00023838467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937704,0.004330408,0.0002795944,0.0007413345,0.0006240514,0.00025419463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023986686,0.00080483063,0.0010115037,0.0012065896,0.00041004055,0.002559591,0.0012410176,0.0012428417,0.024085475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016818605,0.00033274066,0.0008420949,0.0011766814,0.0011788309,0.0042825113,0.0010204425,0.0022495943,0.0019576382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004404678,0.00006189889,0.0007496967,0.00006107008,0.00003812702,0.00006580462,0.000050935385,0.008101288,0.00021399163,0.96773696,0.0033489969,0.01952723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012203156,0.000029431336,0.00085999735,0.000035915604,0.000027116908,0.00013403548,0.000028734292,0.04878011,0.00034360826,0.9462883,0.0034460903,0.000014427966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093788997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066144613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024085475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013258612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00109563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08057392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596875802","doi":"10.1023/a:1026249026940","title":"Newcomb's Hidden Regress","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Overdetermined system; Underdetermined system; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.10397390808836886,"score_gpt":0.40386303184065714,"score_spread":0.29988912375228827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596875802","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019877227,0.0025460313,0.94098306,0.0037424252,0.000559638,0.0000464191,0.00033059702,0.00025221566,0.03166243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6673282,0.006546393,0.22318907,0.0009120532,0.0008679437,0.00016366676,0.0004019022,0.00019642858,0.10039445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890757,0.00039110857,0.000061251885,0.00024026958,0.00030072106,0.00009918439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99227846,0.0059511266,0.0002826832,0.0008989764,0.0004478853,0.00014084502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028634025,0.0007068911,0.0014835148,0.0013803882,0.00071829703,0.0028098084,0.0014638827,0.0014639294,0.010254722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013793184,0.0006267067,0.0011923658,0.0016214226,0.0020983685,0.005243734,0.0018911419,0.0029951278,0.0016127609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032362874,0.000024683806,0.0004814442,0.000062043655,0.00004420832,0.000056383,0.000072482384,0.01046983,0.00013514282,0.95768785,0.0025265021,0.028407102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015163216,0.000008448121,0.0002468227,0.000024554562,0.000026963127,0.00004629888,0.000014635724,0.07385321,0.0003752143,0.9188984,0.006476661,0.000013564262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030505615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025246462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010254722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011836156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012393697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034305453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002408747","doi":"10.1007/s11238-013-9403-2","title":"Catastrophe insurance equilibrium with correlated claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Actuarial science; Auto insurance risk selection; Market liquidity; Economics; Insurance policy; Casualty insurance; General insurance; Bond insurance; Key person insurance; Property insurance; Business; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.009739588197298919,"score_gpt":0.19874307419656265,"score_spread":0.18900348599926373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002408747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7951069,0.0011920291,0.14831872,0.008259677,0.00027337126,0.00011345332,0.00053537433,0.00031624915,0.045884207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98627496,0.00030595748,0.0033108294,0.00016033847,0.00014290286,0.000039262886,0.00008287827,0.000026601687,0.009656285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990056,0.00037283514,0.00004999309,0.00016508446,0.00016733943,0.00023910425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920859,0.005277728,0.00088482513,0.0003540352,0.0004935911,0.00090382085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021582628,0.0007334736,0.0022074033,0.0014121259,0.0012013956,0.0032924223,0.0015732597,0.0034242969,0.010865516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009496574,0.00082993746,0.0014813838,0.00071559416,0.003093976,0.0044171284,0.0020554252,0.002329454,0.0005806236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019451878,0.00015577492,0.00125979,0.00009939965,0.00011010853,0.00076644553,0.00016584306,0.08947585,0.0014995488,0.8993125,0.004064828,0.0028953725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014629893,0.00009392645,0.0014739085,0.000021868012,0.000046590532,0.00025023465,0.00012309905,0.45005766,0.0002911914,0.54689103,0.0005396786,0.000064502885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028235377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019030046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010865516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001544972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011531421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03634876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041906847","doi":"10.1007/s11238-012-9342-3","title":"Are moral norms distinct from social norms? A critical assessment of Jon Elster and Cristina Bicchieri","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Preference; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.11027214976170185,"score_gpt":0.3683432365179837,"score_spread":0.2580710867562818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041906847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008231112,0.03937251,0.00625184,0.90566266,0.0034372744,0.000042715033,0.00004473416,0.000012634911,0.03694451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73965794,0.039345153,0.009948178,0.184966,0.017220713,0.00043251607,0.00007044556,0.000102160324,0.008256931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98502827,0.009499927,0.0004100233,0.0013601576,0.0032006488,0.0005009322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82188684,0.16123839,0.0023467327,0.0027165336,0.009985862,0.0018255832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037268598,0.0008756804,0.001626076,0.004566972,0.005377261,0.009567118,0.0031528568,0.008871444,0.004267308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09509381,0.00056943065,0.0006139261,0.002307023,0.046829905,0.020506507,0.004203639,0.0131197525,0.00057323783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007390249,0.000032224398,0.0003306529,0.00020900666,0.000028983639,0.00008104234,0.0042751096,0.00021103137,0.0000455492,0.94643444,0.03318214,0.015095956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025923882,0.000010197096,0.00035107357,0.0004835279,0.000014828738,0.000052190488,0.0028807956,0.00045257437,0.00007816048,0.9621757,0.033454813,0.000020111864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043751085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037551476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037268598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060489355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063578533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19709754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052441488","doi":"10.1007/s11238-005-2459-x","title":"Policy Stable States in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Graph; Conflict resolution; Policy analysis; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Stability (learning theory); State (computer science); Action plan; Operations research; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Theoretical computer science; Public administration; Algorithm; Law","score_opus":0.10500785286603376,"score_gpt":0.41043910553120244,"score_spread":0.3054312526651687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052441488","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18616581,0.0006370878,0.7547888,0.0054517253,0.00014330805,0.00012916871,0.0008191563,0.0003752496,0.05148972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94936657,0.00052609626,0.03995667,0.00030621936,0.00006193915,0.00017331846,0.00034704892,0.00010796334,0.009154157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985839,0.0008228223,0.000038334772,0.00022883042,0.00013114973,0.00019499107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435586,0.004415384,0.00038898122,0.00024682414,0.0002793243,0.000313643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018845075,0.0007851645,0.001571386,0.0014648916,0.00136477,0.0043328903,0.0017905734,0.0031038297,0.012048777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009532966,0.000628444,0.0010484238,0.001836908,0.0033418222,0.0069456208,0.0017999113,0.0028883035,0.0009443945],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009740409,0.000041969117,0.00029897748,0.000051603703,0.00003762988,0.00007669609,0.00019971847,0.13542858,0.00020791672,0.8572339,0.0018124547,0.004513132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000302635,0.000010925335,0.00006740048,0.000009385814,0.000012120759,0.000011911525,0.000065387685,0.203727,0.00006042293,0.79536414,0.00062807294,0.000012917266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00862029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079563055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012048777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024404794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020776095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040307164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054476895","doi":"10.1007/s11238-009-9134-6","title":"Combining strength and uncertainty for preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution with multiple decision makers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Status quo; Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Conflict resolution; Mathematical optimization; Management science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Machine learning; Political science","score_opus":0.0964554859682428,"score_gpt":0.37250009136491175,"score_spread":0.276044605396669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054476895","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05559567,0.00026538718,0.9387915,0.0009029672,0.00004311368,0.000053658914,0.00010051169,0.00005634443,0.0041908664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8570469,0.0005109211,0.13918434,0.00023202489,0.000095056064,0.00020486985,0.00014388135,0.00006297657,0.002519088],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426067,0.0039632507,0.00017765969,0.000496624,0.0007723966,0.0003293925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745428,0.022745192,0.00087192305,0.0006513276,0.0006667168,0.0005220902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069465055,0.0014053668,0.0021151337,0.0022358086,0.0008919686,0.0034448712,0.0029161323,0.0029823156,0.0043702116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027584758,0.00096231885,0.0017095887,0.002937656,0.0028453993,0.0101313,0.0020441855,0.0032728594,0.00047316574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002618785,0.000099399,0.0011900458,0.00018052399,0.00017815916,0.00020104443,0.0004023175,0.51304513,0.00089057325,0.4590765,0.00079788914,0.023676611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003198933,0.00003343223,0.00017911331,0.0000145024715,0.00004081548,0.00004260912,0.000053725693,0.5666021,0.00013748309,0.4325351,0.00029137716,0.000037757294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003104507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039175893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069465055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019188018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010617853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036737084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063479817","doi":"10.1007/s11238-007-9065-z","title":"Utility of Gambling when Events are Valued: an Application of Inset Entropy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Entropy (arrow of time); Binary entropy function; Mathematical economics; Utility theory; Statistics; Principle of maximum entropy","score_opus":0.12925279367505316,"score_gpt":0.42914729220514236,"score_spread":0.2998944985300892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063479817","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4123551,0.00091496203,0.560748,0.0016543064,0.00017190119,0.000087519315,0.0003579397,0.00014892976,0.023561308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811453,0.00030462348,0.016587518,0.000057397818,0.000097869015,0.000041363157,0.00007442194,0.000025395739,0.0016660652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986706,0.0008107801,0.00006788644,0.00015284006,0.00017346008,0.00012447513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97744066,0.019929243,0.0005914006,0.0010134499,0.00056107127,0.00046407565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038045214,0.000410442,0.0011356772,0.0013659311,0.00043308374,0.00171802,0.001051423,0.0010319513,0.0039257314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02345974,0.00036277488,0.0008946604,0.0012580857,0.0025461647,0.0046420423,0.0018052866,0.0014117158,0.00014506128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021614601,0.00009666224,0.0069428794,0.00011999766,0.00010966458,0.00020998657,0.00041956297,0.07220468,0.0009095463,0.8941247,0.0010212664,0.02362491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013905481,0.00003686844,0.0028491654,0.00003164714,0.00003513941,0.00012137874,0.0001101953,0.27706215,0.00021954403,0.7191104,0.0003825846,0.000026991618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013165427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010237669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039257314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010685938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055850495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020120442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066188514","doi":"10.1007/s11238-012-9348-x","title":"Emotional balance and probability weighting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Taiwan University","keywords":"Weighting; Balance (ability); Normative; Balance theory; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics; Political science","score_opus":0.08542908166859771,"score_gpt":0.3755244638367624,"score_spread":0.2900953821681647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066188514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43820846,0.0023026988,0.4264788,0.008142762,0.00039207557,0.00010887712,0.00010571156,0.00008484455,0.124175794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831777,0.0003234925,0.011474724,0.0003042013,0.00013655145,0.000056375204,0.00003595379,0.000020705602,0.0044703316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791497,0.0011295687,0.00010033311,0.0002344723,0.0004161878,0.00020446494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916129,0.005903936,0.00070097635,0.000505431,0.00080407655,0.000472681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034024834,0.00045259233,0.00054921606,0.0011742511,0.0005822243,0.00315646,0.0006028251,0.0011320319,0.009805348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022928234,0.0003101057,0.00047087783,0.00081950094,0.0018277926,0.003960573,0.0014247199,0.0012471041,0.00051300944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000296289,0.00020748992,0.004785973,0.00012666512,0.00014229286,0.00013410847,0.00070267677,0.010775369,0.0022475347,0.8974917,0.0016437034,0.08144626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022294063,0.000040217623,0.0032687893,0.000015498726,0.00003511984,0.000064903834,0.0001713763,0.017966652,0.0003404557,0.97680444,0.0012557992,0.0000145114645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044663515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032148315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009805348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083531474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034927207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032802165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071889362","doi":"10.1007/s11238-013-9363-6","title":"Theory and implementation of coalitional analysis in cooperative decision making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Transitive relation; Stability (learning theory); Algebraic number; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Mathematical economics; Graph; Range (aeronautics); Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Combinatorics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.04309458511039922,"score_gpt":0.426392385656841,"score_spread":0.3832978005464418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071889362","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013946641,0.00092105253,0.9059965,0.004706197,0.00019829092,0.00013480008,0.000058581598,0.000062925894,0.07397512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7985757,0.0011361727,0.19081743,0.00046624694,0.00022977106,0.0006049944,0.00007983783,0.000058020698,0.008031785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876264,0.008201299,0.0004865176,0.00082025817,0.0022941842,0.00057141454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978799,0.015881594,0.0010984595,0.0021469004,0.0016214683,0.00045261203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01151529,0.00084333593,0.0012673753,0.0016709404,0.002024569,0.0054275324,0.0030890692,0.0027524987,0.008630778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030922772,0.0006379329,0.0015684464,0.0022569345,0.010095569,0.0066984165,0.004021361,0.003534034,0.0007149765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000472014,0.000012788684,0.00006484728,0.00002446299,0.000011769427,0.000008124967,0.00014871843,0.005415946,0.00004144909,0.9905359,0.00023237454,0.003498879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008950468,0.00000951768,0.000042944062,0.00002846996,0.000007257143,0.000011313417,0.00009766229,0.02267784,0.000090188834,0.97471285,0.002307303,0.000005665916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042903502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023231239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01151529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004187446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062859543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060899377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128536831","doi":"10.1007/s11238-011-9249-4","title":"Using turn taking to achieve intertemporal cooperation and symmetry in infinitely repeated 2 × 2 games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Monash University; Australian National University; McGill University; City University of Hong Kong; Purdue University","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Repeated game; Mathematical economics; Dilemma; Path (computing); Prisoner's dilemma; Turn-taking; Stochastic game; Turn (biochemistry); Sequential game; Computer science; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12269238990374412,"score_gpt":0.3860870284441435,"score_spread":0.26339463854039935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128536831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81275076,0.000104181745,0.17029792,0.00040739428,0.000024986715,0.00011780112,0.000040883493,0.000106625695,0.016149463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884566,0.00003466673,0.01052064,0.000037122514,0.0000054116654,0.00007053408,0.0000124470735,0.000008343191,0.00085418473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996302,0.0025089688,0.00012664725,0.00037262202,0.00028354296,0.00040622623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900832,0.0056762337,0.0024448393,0.00096876925,0.00024019986,0.0005867388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00293581,0.00069215405,0.00071200856,0.0004891614,0.00071158493,0.0014628941,0.0009996626,0.0009946162,0.0022856817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012029958,0.00038918402,0.0008227618,0.00024091193,0.0029967884,0.0020007074,0.0014824459,0.0008373824,0.00025768043],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001163289,0.00052380306,0.009478962,0.00024973226,0.00038405947,0.0011957953,0.0020971964,0.30908042,0.034254555,0.60902077,0.0009588383,0.03159252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003382941,0.0011811748,0.004907145,0.00003961697,0.00009243553,0.00049894885,0.00067985617,0.44420975,0.005397731,0.5400806,0.0024647017,0.00010963766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013164988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013622177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00293581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010259632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010085467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015526235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133234212","doi":"10.1007/s11238-014-9458-8","title":"Social choice with approximate interpersonal comparison of welfare gains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preorder; Axiom; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Interpersonal communication; State space; Social choice theory; Welfare economics; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Discrete mathematics; Psychology; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.04195033670055933,"score_gpt":0.2845840094842663,"score_spread":0.24263367278370698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133234212","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25267562,0.0004793654,0.7143223,0.0024023307,0.00015024336,0.00016752389,0.00042800268,0.00020818603,0.029166462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95440966,0.00015192396,0.03995362,0.00017317808,0.00008434016,0.00016468462,0.00014214368,0.00004166461,0.0048788325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944561,0.0036425015,0.00014726738,0.0008121418,0.00057399157,0.00036801558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658085,0.029457731,0.0012631052,0.002057949,0.0007204095,0.0006922872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008009197,0.0007710331,0.002087138,0.001433156,0.0008508453,0.0035570997,0.0028077918,0.002910311,0.013783829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055628207,0.000786933,0.0013130821,0.0018656355,0.0028208527,0.00822972,0.002894219,0.0023274613,0.00062627596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043054947,0.00020054102,0.0027275737,0.00012520213,0.00015948428,0.00018035453,0.00037580475,0.2488434,0.00030957963,0.71963817,0.002165994,0.024843292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026291144,0.00004770706,0.00055051484,0.000015041456,0.000018753059,0.00004649343,0.00008595873,0.6487505,0.000099906916,0.35005108,0.0002925031,0.000015291647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004129112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026364909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013783829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029609813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011468901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046111524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145394968","doi":"10.1007/s11238-005-6849-x","title":"Maximal-Element Rationalizability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Transitive relation; Element (criminal law); Mathematics; Rationality; Relation (database); Maximal element; Mathematical economics; Completeness (order theory); Combinatorics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Set (abstract data type); Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027765605949643366,"score_gpt":0.2512401148187992,"score_spread":0.22347450886915585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145394968","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10068754,0.0014493058,0.5113169,0.011126584,0.00042120003,0.00019589245,0.0006325374,0.0005004398,0.37366962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92963564,0.0007155226,0.031438697,0.0009836514,0.0004997841,0.00028302803,0.00043362853,0.00013992716,0.035870142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996293,0.0013463531,0.00022581677,0.0009787083,0.00070666434,0.0004494954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215215,0.004656858,0.0003282194,0.001359359,0.0011663197,0.0003371247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031207292,0.0009886232,0.0022386878,0.0014644071,0.0023127242,0.00454491,0.0018763657,0.0021356998,0.01573821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010693545,0.0007126205,0.0017379962,0.0014215473,0.005652027,0.00807829,0.0034527509,0.004628176,0.0019485108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001039682,0.000009502683,0.00005186115,0.000017641752,0.00000780374,0.000007994128,0.00009102748,0.00036908963,0.000084626736,0.996988,0.0006637749,0.001698374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000445692,0.0000019432612,0.00002202208,0.000003363394,0.0000026011544,0.000005744491,0.000018444287,0.00082459726,0.000047444017,0.99843067,0.0006372781,0.0000015628008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001136955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007597364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01573821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017855631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012048595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052649617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772681577","doi":"10.1007/s11238-017-9643-7","title":"The wisdom of collective grading and the effects of epistemic and semantic diversity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Arts and Humanities Research Council; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Epistemology; Grading (engineering); Diversity (politics); Philosophy; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.019073952973342856,"score_gpt":0.22431862195545696,"score_spread":0.2052446689821141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772681577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4729828,0.007232727,0.12761202,0.08529684,0.0010226598,0.00015717254,0.0005452061,0.0002494548,0.30490115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875201,0.0004805335,0.0077404478,0.0010394992,0.0004389854,0.000043377615,0.000054571927,0.00007155157,0.0026109377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9611943,0.021691423,0.0020504282,0.0045844154,0.008809695,0.0016696854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5275721,0.39522594,0.017123584,0.035260554,0.017883437,0.006934393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05480854,0.00075073953,0.002534717,0.0034679654,0.0047191684,0.011022424,0.0029561287,0.0066621876,0.01429263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21579301,0.00075517135,0.0012878843,0.002961446,0.021612357,0.020016434,0.0062533813,0.007247224,0.0009987972],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005929416,0.00028603492,0.008391159,0.00040584148,0.00030357187,0.00010630289,0.0034207627,0.007814836,0.0004988704,0.92262936,0.0046041254,0.050946023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009502199,0.00003265054,0.002199389,0.000049530023,0.00005707997,0.000023192037,0.0004917978,0.0034772735,0.00020483938,0.99149334,0.0018502045,0.000025661797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035254834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057253256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05480854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004230143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004115945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28985876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893737531","doi":"10.1007/s11238-018-9673-9","title":"Sunk ‘Decision Points’: a theory of the endowment effect and present bias","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment effect; Situational ethics; Sunk costs; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Endowment; Mechanism (biology); Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Inference; Prospect theory; Positive economics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0818551225695389,"score_gpt":0.381343428437957,"score_spread":0.29948830586841807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893737531","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1854393,0.0038392057,0.76402354,0.008482197,0.0004926782,0.00008330255,0.00024799537,0.00016295932,0.037228834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513503,0.0011450859,0.04191301,0.0005585937,0.0003589125,0.00007080521,0.000074393116,0.000058164514,0.004470749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997684,0.0011003338,0.0000843501,0.00049809157,0.00044395894,0.00018921484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877808,0.008629728,0.0010129393,0.0014664038,0.0007063441,0.00040375115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005507673,0.0004996296,0.0011052286,0.0012647171,0.00065422914,0.003978342,0.0018591045,0.0020751562,0.00845002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026335044,0.00046086943,0.0011368581,0.0013042092,0.004976472,0.008737294,0.0022172788,0.0030660725,0.0006212258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010960266,0.000039280832,0.0023623228,0.00009333278,0.000084778905,0.000065989996,0.0002868044,0.011502562,0.0005078099,0.95842355,0.0008463612,0.02567751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013952182,0.00002162552,0.0009794428,0.00001760115,0.000014347841,0.00003594328,0.00004151476,0.016914688,0.00016002795,0.9809312,0.0008545586,0.000015122493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083527766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064633845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00845002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013431509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061377685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029127717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963142712","doi":"10.1007/s11238-017-9612-1","title":"Confidence biases and learning among intuitive Bayesians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Contrarian; Overconfidence effect; Bayesian probability; Task (project management); Perception; Conservatism; Computer science; Phenomenon; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Machine learning; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13014408484338472,"score_gpt":0.42261229900778424,"score_spread":0.2924682141643995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963142712","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39861864,0.002254173,0.5773835,0.007357182,0.0001782436,0.000075467826,0.00024842107,0.00019725082,0.013687182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96514213,0.0008545634,0.031404775,0.00050236343,0.00023796177,0.00006832267,0.0001346455,0.00005309817,0.0016022047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922037,0.0046073594,0.0004363323,0.0011756079,0.0011549566,0.0004219429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75780654,0.21794514,0.00953651,0.007088562,0.0058728284,0.001750388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019971047,0.0007589864,0.0013296144,0.002238787,0.0007163597,0.005624646,0.0018352756,0.0027792237,0.0051590404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.228363,0.001036378,0.00096505083,0.0015307502,0.0048613604,0.0107655125,0.002728419,0.0037345611,0.00036796578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033035545,0.00013899077,0.009390255,0.00027274128,0.00023932525,0.00012650451,0.00093722413,0.043096088,0.0005514563,0.8904713,0.001574196,0.052871685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020144666,0.000012041508,0.0009108855,0.0000204452,0.000016842867,0.000022566272,0.00003383501,0.034969773,0.00011871697,0.9636347,0.00022450903,0.000015501304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016673965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009883676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019971047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015278064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089867454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10561824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119266273","doi":"10.1007/s11238-020-09791-z","title":"Measuring rationality: percentages vs expenditures","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Measure (data warehouse); Variety (cybernetics); Sign (mathematics); Economics; Econometrics; Work (physics); Sensitivity (control systems); Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05383645305722129,"score_gpt":0.24644283128394817,"score_spread":0.19260637822672688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119266273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7204502,0.0023638369,0.18728513,0.003847086,0.0003460298,0.00012164548,0.0022629122,0.0004948906,0.08282822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824149,0.00034983354,0.014662345,0.00010083443,0.0000819682,0.00005702609,0.00034374656,0.000062899664,0.0019265385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98571014,0.008352885,0.0009837628,0.0012780315,0.00311958,0.00055567647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9044917,0.074793816,0.009677799,0.007185342,0.0029498653,0.0009014882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076388507,0.0009289821,0.0009042167,0.0034467753,0.00040086568,0.0044671646,0.001392874,0.001784084,0.008904084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100877196,0.00034966186,0.0006631868,0.0043531014,0.0025931098,0.00733325,0.001702951,0.0014849557,0.0015026848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002245092,0.00048069298,0.160451,0.00048233854,0.000667105,0.00015663012,0.0024497707,0.05595127,0.003982961,0.48491088,0.007998877,0.2802233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011691713,0.0006030501,0.09310301,0.00045913216,0.0004101018,0.00061139785,0.0051023904,0.13998498,0.014437631,0.7325453,0.012460223,0.00016584423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001954956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012859936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008904084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012869218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069638196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040398598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192066814","doi":"10.1007/s11238-012-9293-8","title":"Pareto utility","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Isoelastic utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Pareto principle; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Subjective expected utility; Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Mathematical optimization; Function (biology); Exponential function; Exponential utility; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0801050099982059,"score_gpt":0.3952288934776774,"score_spread":0.3151238834794715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192066814","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057138526,0.0010574702,0.95792896,0.0010647897,0.0000864999,0.00013145908,0.00012494819,0.00007379364,0.03381822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.424558,0.005244845,0.5386287,0.001064226,0.00033758164,0.0011095271,0.00043650414,0.00019071781,0.0284298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970476,0.0015405681,0.00014038167,0.0003514981,0.00071197515,0.00020807578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680823,0.0019943472,0.00019749397,0.00028688597,0.0005956222,0.00011740744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006265554,0.0016291931,0.0014452863,0.0017545101,0.0012759313,0.0035266443,0.0021582001,0.0018590868,0.007977456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014205955,0.00051455013,0.0014682281,0.0023209609,0.002297279,0.0058142566,0.0022071598,0.0030319719,0.0021916702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016024338,0.00003847703,0.0003219962,0.00014495994,0.000022498463,0.00006269272,0.00012612871,0.017736685,0.00033818238,0.94993025,0.002354363,0.028907645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018637358,0.00009595579,0.00024909392,0.00016849989,0.000029359378,0.00022272486,0.00014766603,0.09175305,0.00069963525,0.88653183,0.02004834,0.0000353202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001213674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011449187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007977456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023211883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022914633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03313577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241625290","doi":"10.1007/s11238-004-5641-7","title":"The dynamic stability of coalitionist behaviour for two-strategy bimatrix games","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stability (learning theory); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.029289359964888618,"score_gpt":0.28302498621405237,"score_spread":0.25373562624916374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241625290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61086154,0.00041990678,0.3552156,0.0024978777,0.00007872077,0.00013975558,0.00033153556,0.00012264257,0.030332383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98415506,0.00018250901,0.010692839,0.00007880014,0.00003869134,0.00012474338,0.00012705836,0.000033383298,0.004566985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977235,0.0010406385,0.000111861475,0.00041688507,0.00032455788,0.00038246278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97813624,0.016624609,0.0020086796,0.0010026415,0.0011048658,0.0011230026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039506084,0.0005920635,0.0015906661,0.0014086269,0.0020466987,0.004116848,0.0024477292,0.0021615503,0.007529019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03218396,0.0007147143,0.0011428844,0.0011778679,0.0043585068,0.005956804,0.0025501614,0.0026719535,0.0005235391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023698679,0.00006648649,0.0010219817,0.0000725321,0.000059968577,0.000106620464,0.0006867797,0.048984148,0.0012933982,0.9404811,0.0011465104,0.0058434396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005044045,0.00003537234,0.00041193527,0.000013333992,0.000012649607,0.000046783935,0.00020153794,0.24464676,0.00023635654,0.7537362,0.0005823874,0.000026186557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056317737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030078955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007529019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002454913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018822288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025187075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376138165","doi":"10.1007/s11238-023-09934-y","title":"The precautionary principle when project implementation capacity is congestible","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Postponement; Planner; Scope (computer science); Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Operations research; Business; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.16073581390796507,"score_gpt":0.3502594132150123,"score_spread":0.18952359930704724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376138165","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14764208,0.0008152649,0.6391282,0.019678662,0.00043066475,0.00020844821,0.00047503418,0.000561008,0.1910606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97312486,0.0002604947,0.014084432,0.0007610143,0.00031887935,0.00015788234,0.000048057893,0.00011254432,0.011131816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954465,0.0013589235,0.00020698819,0.00086108653,0.00096092664,0.0011655713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97536916,0.016399547,0.002198075,0.0035023987,0.0014844084,0.0010464467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006304215,0.00071014126,0.0015895807,0.0011951539,0.0013266153,0.0043545524,0.002465098,0.004286785,0.014578735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031703733,0.0012020121,0.001705241,0.00085450924,0.0054398477,0.009610041,0.0037529971,0.007189301,0.0008326656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009187996,0.00005129041,0.000659504,0.0000928605,0.00006873699,0.0001527933,0.00017157682,0.035303853,0.0006608333,0.949656,0.0030665237,0.010024048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021250597,0.000026678152,0.00036760257,0.000030446548,0.000014505862,0.000064043226,0.00006391954,0.019825837,0.00043818392,0.97695917,0.002173391,0.0000150386095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018522957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016182492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014578735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001485571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026937413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048770726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411349214","doi":"10.1007/s11238-025-10048-w","title":"Payment schemes for finitely repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Mathematical economics; Dilemma; Payment; Game theory; Superrationality; Mathematics; Economics; Actuarial science; Computer science; Law and economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0669329766000516,"score_gpt":0.4109754526165244,"score_spread":0.3440424760164728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411349214","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103188455,0.0011248105,0.8472839,0.0045217006,0.0004060571,0.0005381551,0.00026318073,0.0002869253,0.042386718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8491069,0.00089707196,0.12837812,0.0004483639,0.0002756805,0.00094096834,0.00015706498,0.00007848192,0.019717474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869848,0.008373635,0.0009319658,0.0009536138,0.0016913956,0.0010645258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567096,0.03500227,0.002827138,0.0028322898,0.0014888297,0.0011398827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013688802,0.001122059,0.002201776,0.0014278215,0.0020434083,0.0068690847,0.004784559,0.005316957,0.008643263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049595516,0.0010608864,0.0013600463,0.0017507044,0.0042821225,0.011089874,0.0032190704,0.004886871,0.001046468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011604319,0.00006959209,0.00013078305,0.000085537235,0.00002026248,0.000038095735,0.00016995089,0.015800685,0.0003080834,0.9733156,0.00096242235,0.008982902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009192547,0.000055509332,0.00007644175,0.000039484203,0.000015218075,0.000043455162,0.000032821015,0.056061093,0.0001680762,0.9418373,0.001553855,0.000024855586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000981172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007047054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013688802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003920391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032827193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07239419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412588131","doi":"10.1007/s11238-025-10073-9","title":"A duality between utility transforms and probability distortions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Duality (order theory); Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Utility theory; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.10523689138528741,"score_gpt":0.41825811575637145,"score_spread":0.31302122437108404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412588131","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08757877,0.0009684669,0.84863263,0.0023985861,0.00018161033,0.00008714623,0.00021385401,0.00011088592,0.059828047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933864,0.00071979576,0.05871507,0.00039502594,0.00022243118,0.00012213553,0.00011025622,0.00006143486,0.0057898336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960037,0.0016955982,0.0002634827,0.00065136154,0.0011338105,0.00025211665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187464,0.0045758346,0.0011080264,0.0011927896,0.00092499034,0.00032372106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037336901,0.00065329636,0.00064221496,0.0011545472,0.0006850649,0.0036114806,0.00081775157,0.0009844918,0.0070628887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016945595,0.00035484816,0.0010576039,0.0010929836,0.0053297,0.010447482,0.0027603353,0.00308116,0.0006687868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017037624,0.000013554515,0.00021578254,0.000015321999,0.0000071448667,0.00004003867,0.000084477564,0.0021177304,0.0002847667,0.9917875,0.00016382089,0.005252795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009886852,0.000028660059,0.00019350421,0.00001332941,0.000006173425,0.0001379473,0.00004561535,0.008658353,0.0004343419,0.9885257,0.0019348715,0.000011556928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048212352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024007913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070628887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015615477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082946237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023627698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413195541","doi":"10.1007/s11238-025-10083-7","title":"Oriented data-generating processes: a categorization of ROC curves","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Receiver operating characteristic; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Data mining; Econometrics; Pattern recognition (psychology)","score_opus":0.026292291034637986,"score_gpt":0.31295091938331565,"score_spread":0.28665862834867767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413195541","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09463263,0.001807633,0.8869484,0.0033751747,0.000110229215,0.0007314818,0.0005760443,0.00068326504,0.0111350715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69162506,0.0015073788,0.3013501,0.0009063704,0.00027149369,0.0015444033,0.0008311202,0.00025946734,0.0017046486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97517055,0.014875154,0.0014598562,0.0033584426,0.0041437307,0.0009922824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7803632,0.1700081,0.014343574,0.021830563,0.010692178,0.0027624064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04317842,0.0021857198,0.0018235536,0.00850108,0.0011911211,0.0075848647,0.0023395459,0.00413646,0.0033742576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1924341,0.00075883564,0.0024362446,0.005424103,0.008568986,0.007933501,0.0041990024,0.004619132,0.0009878977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020355613,0.00014559827,0.021353919,0.00032810544,0.00018228305,0.00047230872,0.0019497374,0.03129886,0.0020333312,0.8509439,0.0022784285,0.08880999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006449648,0.0001806971,0.0070649735,0.00017526277,0.00006691482,0.00062689476,0.0004702287,0.13250588,0.0010020004,0.8538516,0.0038828552,0.000108156004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000997531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031013082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04317842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028693487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014585924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22835207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415566272","doi":"10.1007/s11238-025-10102-7","title":"Comparative dynamics in a dynamic oligopoly model of capital accumulation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Oligopoly; Capital accumulation; Best response; Nash equilibrium; Differential game; Path (computing); Epsilon-equilibrium; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.03858308199944627,"score_gpt":0.2986092226643149,"score_spread":0.2600261406648686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415566272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50482225,0.0024365876,0.31163982,0.01005037,0.00021844037,0.00009778322,0.00075273967,0.00027917096,0.16970284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702092,0.00073607935,0.01287831,0.00018075622,0.000056787714,0.000044566,0.00010212424,0.00003532751,0.015756888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956805,0.00019946462,0.000014737918,0.0000849864,0.000074141935,0.000058582173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972594,0.0018217122,0.00031128305,0.00015457833,0.00019832734,0.00025482377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012985986,0.00030608894,0.00082800543,0.0008907545,0.00097451115,0.0031329705,0.0015273985,0.0019397349,0.01359817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006559133,0.00042533522,0.00065007695,0.0013769501,0.0021518725,0.004637248,0.0011041468,0.0013061739,0.00053849194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025430916,0.000018638475,0.00029386167,0.000021134645,0.000009923528,0.000071598646,0.00007430391,0.047421176,0.00017530589,0.9482649,0.0009781331,0.0026456483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029665309,0.000021268073,0.000400484,0.000015438169,0.000009714138,0.000076265,0.000072767085,0.24411353,0.000068537796,0.75298977,0.002186876,0.000015624053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074669984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004622319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01359817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022520465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013818081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045490444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}