{"meta":{"query_hash":"af8761afb470","filters":{"venue":"Theory and Decision"},"cohort_total":23,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":23,"exported":23,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af8761afb470","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Theory+and+Decision"},"results":[{"id":"W1555008460","doi":"10.1007/s11238-017-9597-9","title":"Conditional expected utility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Preference; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Decision theory; Separable space; Utility theory; Representation theorem; Preference theory; Conditional probability; Consistency (knowledge bases); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.15982006671841248,"score_gpt":0.45042826275737896,"score_spread":0.2906081960389665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555008460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95805675,0.00009280984,0.029229958,0.00011499755,0.0006109892,0.000082769395,0.00004464071,0.000035217865,0.011731886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759513,0.000013087241,0.0015187588,0.0001556953,0.00009447262,0.0000038002381,0.0000044243743,0.000007918473,0.0006067004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978255,0.00018344073,0.00054740126,0.00058256433,0.00066619203,0.00019491544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931557,0.0046244585,0.00033561868,0.0015057623,0.00020710049,0.00017134732],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066245147,0.00014701062,0.00030278065,0.00015424874,0.0012033598,0.0010743621,0.0010275169,0.00011561616,0.0026818875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092586465,0.000101307254,0.0001160632,0.00007601053,0.0004415953,0.00070335926,0.00045509086,0.00014026208,0.0009937347],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045712414,0.00004766797,0.0041010906,2.992225e-7,0.0000033393237,0.000015532252,0.000086487256,0.0000031633242,0.00007970983,0.037956186,0.003190912,0.95405847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038912866,0.000038742513,0.1254107,0.000012444024,0.000006404549,0.000022913126,0.00019454607,0.00026242668,0.00012293056,0.86391973,0.009501344,0.00011868908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005872322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000102795975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014124852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035439967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596875802","doi":"10.1023/a:1026249026940","title":"Newcomb's Hidden Regress","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Overdetermined system; Underdetermined system; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.10397390808836886,"score_gpt":0.40386303184065714,"score_spread":0.29988912375228827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596875802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559432,0.00065084145,0.018444128,0.00005712866,0.00086217053,0.00010203583,0.000006390567,0.000046496152,0.0238876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99134225,0.000052189906,0.0062114657,0.00033603256,0.000051250787,0.0000035377498,8.693823e-7,0.000016042446,0.0019863388],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971905,0.00048459487,0.0006852812,0.00065611716,0.00070880575,0.00027469758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99139667,0.007066532,0.00019736018,0.0009692319,0.00015082739,0.0002193645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100270705,0.00019204894,0.00036837478,0.00029058606,0.00030576755,0.00046544525,0.0005894152,0.00014063904,0.0016546116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006568519,0.00012726833,0.00016574045,0.00041644016,0.00016786136,0.00040724565,0.0001689561,0.00017018881,0.0014063796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019832388,0.000039002185,0.0007473358,3.5979068e-7,0.0000033596045,0.000017742166,0.00013230783,0.00000964344,0.000059457627,0.12768658,0.003423207,0.8676827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041798374,0.00007254341,0.0013234883,0.000022871838,0.000011569147,0.00006866174,0.00051010423,0.00004537541,0.0002607848,0.9381299,0.05896144,0.00017528722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002983109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8675074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022499366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042375847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002408747","doi":"10.1007/s11238-013-9403-2","title":"Catastrophe insurance equilibrium with correlated claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Actuarial science; Auto insurance risk selection; Market liquidity; Economics; Insurance policy; Casualty insurance; General insurance; Bond insurance; Key person insurance; Property insurance; Business; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.009739588197298919,"score_gpt":0.19874307419656265,"score_spread":0.18900348599926373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002408747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8457162,0.0008470854,0.12989137,0.00003178498,0.00024276593,0.00011479361,0.000026043432,0.0000350752,0.023094917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794394,0.00019480234,0.0010547873,0.00025544703,0.000066508364,0.000008220276,0.000007945662,0.000016630109,0.00045170024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910015,0.000023298744,0.00030076382,0.00032273156,0.000040829542,0.00021225568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993054,0.00015800261,0.00014220824,0.0003164831,0.000020691825,0.000057162917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010681339,0.00012851499,0.0002617127,0.00010192963,0.00011073147,0.000051793835,0.00014238272,0.000066478875,0.00008453093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079391844,0.000111008216,0.000035508252,0.00017835583,0.000087724344,0.0002028927,0.00006117987,0.00011460487,0.000504938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006531244,0.000034866105,0.018189179,0.000008904432,0.000011715609,0.0000042248616,0.00012512793,0.00016302045,0.000011999019,0.9039384,0.00030864787,0.07655075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011676872,0.00029195548,0.16017948,0.000048274927,0.000005067888,0.000007009342,0.000033104756,0.0009106645,0.000048488604,0.80830914,0.02874461,0.00025451777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016428903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037619277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15222779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014887932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004040566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6490125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041906847","doi":"10.1007/s11238-012-9342-3","title":"Are moral norms distinct from social norms? A critical assessment of Jon Elster and Cristina Bicchieri","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Preference; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.11027214976170185,"score_gpt":0.3683432365179837,"score_spread":0.2580710867562818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041906847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932402,0.00011013225,0.004137137,0.0003267731,0.0003110649,0.00006564845,0.00007231934,0.000015417729,0.0017213328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983424,0.000014353143,0.0007547547,0.00066182617,0.00017593945,0.000003785555,0.0000031412526,0.000006516048,0.00003728602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998951,0.00016674999,0.00019687213,0.0002483665,0.0002322812,0.00020474124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986136,0.0010569897,0.00008257087,0.000110018285,0.000020604433,0.00011620759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005191978,0.000115231145,0.00019585348,0.00004264532,0.00020816375,0.00002380373,0.0000920022,0.00007237058,0.00017142623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036960797,0.00007959126,0.000041541647,0.000054489068,0.0003963743,0.00019919247,0.00012884276,0.00012976486,0.00001564918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040011895,0.0018799485,0.25673622,0.00008595169,0.00002503153,0.000074064774,0.001588746,0.0000013685016,0.08755601,0.51577926,0.0025037755,0.12976846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003835873,0.000079014426,0.72200054,0.00003212936,0.000015297483,0.00001828287,0.000100691366,0.000034587218,0.001395183,0.27571893,0.00012991008,0.000091866445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035026796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010275658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46526432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000108804425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051321854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32456374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052441488","doi":"10.1007/s11238-005-2459-x","title":"Policy Stable States in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Graph; Conflict resolution; Policy analysis; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Stability (learning theory); State (computer science); Action plan; Operations research; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Theoretical computer science; Public administration; Algorithm; Law","score_opus":0.10500785286603376,"score_gpt":0.41043910553120244,"score_spread":0.3054312526651687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052441488","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45433477,0.00014449916,0.54336494,0.00076176453,0.000019774523,0.00028402172,0.000032714852,0.000014319156,0.0010431908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99524707,0.00009329692,0.003228287,0.0009195208,0.000042947893,0.00006727692,0.000006396456,0.000006878799,0.00038831617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983919,0.00023071047,0.00040025162,0.0003288737,0.0004158498,0.0002323814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938782,0.0053174803,0.00009667839,0.0005431868,0.00010356341,0.000060902763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010453807,0.00010893161,0.00016475767,0.00027633965,0.00035397548,0.00016378876,0.00052087754,0.00006247319,0.000018297362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017584092,0.00006211303,0.00006794807,0.0007094647,0.00019103287,0.00024962449,0.000067493056,0.000101434925,0.000043488002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004702569,0.00005346273,0.000013012709,0.0000010373551,0.00000163501,4.258297e-7,0.0027158007,0.03517611,0.00022702756,0.9338288,0.00027948813,0.027233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006890739,0.000055820004,0.00047129433,0.000012730955,0.000004899192,0.000006158114,0.001717177,0.01220481,0.00019422981,0.9827035,0.0018590069,0.00008130956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001953272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035879235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54091233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019220071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000632928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36231017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054476895","doi":"10.1007/s11238-009-9134-6","title":"Combining strength and uncertainty for preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution with multiple decision makers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Status quo; Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Conflict resolution; Mathematical optimization; Management science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Machine learning; Political science","score_opus":0.0964554859682428,"score_gpt":0.37250009136491175,"score_spread":0.276044605396669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054476895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57054657,0.0001599825,0.42830133,0.00014462047,0.000018215283,0.00060272025,0.000034796078,0.000013444222,0.0001783552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98387563,0.000060063885,0.015519975,0.0003391201,0.00002031292,0.00010424947,0.000011413437,0.0000066145167,0.00006262951],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980699,0.00023392067,0.00047082256,0.0005254313,0.00045164736,0.0002482794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977971,0.021171348,0.00016569841,0.00045468318,0.00015806245,0.00007918899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008253896,0.00017396898,0.0002705085,0.00020351584,0.0005242083,0.00022156406,0.00043019294,0.00009368969,0.0000068429767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022713111,0.000092373404,0.0000625107,0.00038480468,0.0002218839,0.0002568412,0.00004159025,0.00012007294,0.000001909862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007780202,0.00012157296,0.00031667136,0.0000030515912,0.0000057209286,4.726201e-7,0.0029392815,0.0126945935,0.00020125267,0.45651484,0.00037327036,0.5190491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00179476,0.00041204318,0.003553537,0.000052122556,0.000015857677,0.000005864615,0.0026250551,0.16522373,0.000058983624,0.82547814,0.0006597779,0.00012015266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000036240922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007971173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51892895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009918321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029963301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40318394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063479817","doi":"10.1007/s11238-007-9065-z","title":"Utility of Gambling when Events are Valued: an Application of Inset Entropy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Entropy (arrow of time); Binary entropy function; Mathematical economics; Utility theory; Statistics; Principle of maximum entropy","score_opus":0.12925279367505316,"score_gpt":0.42914729220514236,"score_spread":0.2998944985300892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063479817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74496305,0.00009751769,0.25433496,0.0000065711833,0.00014297836,0.000121883175,0.000026623218,0.000012476067,0.00029392156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274594,0.000012080815,0.0071210875,0.000042004016,0.00003482336,0.0000012858002,0.0000048138545,0.000008745691,0.000029211002],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714255,0.00024080307,0.0011539254,0.00049127796,0.00078717317,0.00018424676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946122,0.0032715937,0.00071666355,0.0009107217,0.0003462206,0.00014255439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015090469,0.00013721069,0.00042014476,0.00034869876,0.0001062942,0.000040141098,0.00057710166,0.00013303407,0.00022259928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020786098,0.00010107411,0.00011049396,0.00033220288,0.00015078773,0.0003717391,0.00018085376,0.00010903045,0.000038685404],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013765862,0.00019470204,0.034264397,0.0000029630369,0.0000037841783,0.0000014423688,0.00038416224,0.00002570992,0.0014779093,0.008101834,0.0000682493,0.9540983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039201725,0.00011226044,0.11790256,0.00003895701,0.000014060783,0.000005400378,0.0009402794,0.0014678588,0.0034084874,0.8750756,0.00054450345,0.00009805163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001898508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028165661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95400023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012109087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025605206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5230085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066188514","doi":"10.1007/s11238-012-9348-x","title":"Emotional balance and probability weighting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Taiwan University","keywords":"Weighting; Balance (ability); Normative; Balance theory; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics; Political science","score_opus":0.08542908166859771,"score_gpt":0.3755244638367624,"score_spread":0.2900953821681647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066188514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98156327,0.000640858,0.015035462,0.000068706395,0.0004762436,0.00009874463,0.0000097730135,0.00002966523,0.002077305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909294,0.000028831968,0.008590906,0.00015712967,0.00014262935,0.0000029833334,0.000001130382,0.000007392114,0.00013960064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980599,0.00024986346,0.00051362655,0.00042568796,0.0004893506,0.00026156195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318725,0.0059070596,0.0001512216,0.00043184633,0.00010383834,0.0002187794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0114076035,0.00013815603,0.00025665291,0.00012819938,0.00029561628,0.00022671557,0.00024748442,0.000094875504,0.00046717213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003591264,0.00009147703,0.000058040838,0.00020025956,0.0001920463,0.000688086,0.0002757842,0.00013095653,0.00024966363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001682965,0.000059548616,0.0457003,0.0000012623075,0.000001893285,0.0000010462228,0.00028125715,0.000005350858,0.00011008943,0.046870396,0.00037494212,0.9064256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021946707,0.00003445297,0.08771411,0.000024904106,0.0000059100485,0.00004745177,0.00019734027,0.00027197867,0.000079817466,0.9076682,0.0036161612,0.00012025347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014716622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000131137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9063054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001969378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016708726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51152074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071889362","doi":"10.1007/s11238-013-9363-6","title":"Theory and implementation of coalitional analysis in cooperative decision making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Transitive relation; Stability (learning theory); Algebraic number; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Mathematical economics; Graph; Range (aeronautics); Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Combinatorics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.04309458511039922,"score_gpt":0.426392385656841,"score_spread":0.3832978005464418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071889362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77087986,0.00018770802,0.22797023,0.0000415518,0.000025751693,0.00024523807,0.000029052531,0.00000839268,0.00061219424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996928,0.000041059993,0.0027185634,0.00016535245,0.000015752914,0.000037121783,0.000008210922,0.0000061194974,0.00007983696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997055,0.0009472195,0.0007976537,0.0004585421,0.0005726463,0.00016894969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812781,0.017746499,0.00023381569,0.00039242895,0.00026887632,0.000080268655],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010685907,0.00014213822,0.000366853,0.0006821979,0.00018874896,0.00015212392,0.0002631722,0.00007334924,0.003685487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015610481,0.00010013126,0.00008120187,0.0013365196,0.00026290637,0.000497054,0.00018220548,0.00010224881,0.00007684366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039712153,0.000037285285,0.008615874,0.0000013847688,0.000029061977,7.257851e-7,0.0010053029,0.00023782517,0.0007482786,0.6334837,0.00008102078,0.35536242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003869323,0.000046367477,0.22392294,0.000022389439,0.000040577514,0.000003792472,0.005692416,0.00043493556,0.0004071658,0.7689049,0.00005018602,0.00008739181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017225397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000726473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35527503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015598709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027060134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128536831","doi":"10.1007/s11238-011-9249-4","title":"Using turn taking to achieve intertemporal cooperation and symmetry in infinitely repeated 2 × 2 games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Monash University; Australian National University; McGill University; City University of Hong Kong; Purdue University","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Repeated game; Mathematical economics; Dilemma; Path (computing); Prisoner's dilemma; Turn-taking; Stochastic game; Turn (biochemistry); Sequential game; Computer science; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12269238990374412,"score_gpt":0.3860870284441435,"score_spread":0.26339463854039935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128536831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99152416,0.00033299098,0.00053386594,0.000017844419,0.000109312445,0.00013381927,0.0000014927655,0.000016855569,0.0073296395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747175,0.00006515512,0.002281731,0.00012205351,0.000019896625,0.0000032520566,6.122652e-7,0.000005301976,0.000030223677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934316,0.00014173392,0.00017139374,0.00017074663,0.00005552593,0.00011743548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964505,0.00015313612,0.000054403958,0.000067208566,0.000022450546,0.00005772709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001037341,0.00007025267,0.000121253004,0.00010840111,0.00020843737,0.000053420146,0.000057488305,0.000050527982,0.000040654548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020563435,0.000063776424,0.00001203355,0.000123201,0.00012617017,0.00024276471,0.00010970192,0.000058415855,0.0000053403714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026036105,0.00014252316,0.15316768,0.0000062021,0.000017174218,0.000026892703,0.22931021,0.000008339909,0.0121344915,0.30545312,0.000035993944,0.29709375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029044114,0.0014583771,0.16248357,0.0008885728,0.00006796628,0.000027146436,0.18307555,0.0005657626,0.017647171,0.6286132,0.0008099206,0.0014583826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088172476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007666712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32316005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046565525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013445299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2600727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133234212","doi":"10.1007/s11238-014-9458-8","title":"Social choice with approximate interpersonal comparison of welfare gains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preorder; Axiom; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Interpersonal communication; State space; Social choice theory; Welfare economics; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Discrete mathematics; Psychology; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.04195033670055933,"score_gpt":0.2845840094842663,"score_spread":0.24263367278370698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133234212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92441016,0.00015058044,0.024351751,0.00021510062,0.00006271902,0.000060057788,0.000029620203,0.0000150153,0.050704964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921876,0.0000027164433,0.00046504388,0.00013888977,0.000098802295,0.0000032049627,0.0000048844563,0.000011189363,0.000056525987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924976,0.000023738758,0.00034028268,0.00021620926,0.00002187374,0.0001481506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937993,0.00023803863,0.00019602843,0.0001277724,0.000010088853,0.000048135902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007407555,0.00009965937,0.00035014172,0.00009630907,0.0001364106,0.000024446534,0.000118806965,0.0000700336,0.000097135795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009838065,0.00008916026,0.000050075145,0.00006348697,0.00012481584,0.00011626405,0.00005109259,0.00009299053,0.000045291054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003070913,0.00004776219,0.019146502,0.000019936326,0.000016240094,1.1170869e-7,0.0008925708,0.000008520425,0.000005668986,0.9643842,0.00018892217,0.014982467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008719503,0.00019513135,0.050495483,0.000021475511,0.000006136928,0.0000022420695,0.00026825332,0.0045512086,0.000096172,0.93649584,0.00682182,0.00017426393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014620263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070454385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07480855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013761131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023570012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.363585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145394968","doi":"10.1007/s11238-005-6849-x","title":"Maximal-Element Rationalizability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Transitive relation; Element (criminal law); Mathematics; Rationality; Relation (database); Maximal element; Mathematical economics; Completeness (order theory); Combinatorics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Set (abstract data type); Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027765605949643366,"score_gpt":0.2512401148187992,"score_spread":0.22347450886915585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145394968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8713516,0.001566366,0.10076537,0.00015086167,0.00018844283,0.00012565538,0.000024458892,0.000036807498,0.025790423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996716,0.00003254254,0.0017314426,0.00025588204,0.00014200302,0.0000075248886,0.000004179794,0.0000075885173,0.0011027908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913764,0.00005287391,0.0003975067,0.0002512013,0.000030013996,0.00013073815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992298,0.00036054043,0.00011146904,0.00022845856,0.000014762521,0.000054997297],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039124102,0.0000841956,0.00018101347,0.00006948857,0.000118136784,0.00004237772,0.00009452116,0.000049568025,0.0013699419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022522062,0.00008142705,0.00004649507,0.000067051624,0.000050982104,0.00015635462,0.000044041804,0.00005913392,0.0009393897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012569853,0.000041510422,0.0037778472,0.000005564885,0.0000069677626,3.6342948e-7,0.00023895927,0.00005660217,0.000017028948,0.9687545,0.00019645438,0.026778549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033407833,0.000036548492,0.0071470663,0.000011290587,0.0000018064143,0.0000042257952,0.000048306134,0.0005487813,0.00010984305,0.94093084,0.05072195,0.00010524172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034257491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020974826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12536444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027854197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003931685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772681577","doi":"10.1007/s11238-017-9643-7","title":"The wisdom of collective grading and the effects of epistemic and semantic diversity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Arts and Humanities Research Council; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Epistemology; Grading (engineering); Diversity (politics); Philosophy; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.019073952973342856,"score_gpt":0.22431862195545696,"score_spread":0.2052446689821141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772681577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869218,0.0021149481,0.000039156337,0.00013917373,0.00017171318,0.00010646662,0.0000024183182,0.0000025769507,0.010501736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991475,0.00034938604,0.000005461885,0.00002011651,0.000025978617,8.859637e-7,3.7610246e-8,0.0000013806999,0.00044928232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996104,0.000080266225,0.00007792096,0.0000861993,0.000091418486,0.00005374631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972034,0.002474476,0.00011822495,0.00015351051,0.0000307029,0.000019676336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010473087,0.000047531437,0.00012109053,0.00002190999,0.0035528166,0.00006347301,0.0001563904,0.000013278733,0.000003997498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032634116,0.000023634206,0.000022049473,0.0000075499383,0.004264049,0.00013589764,0.00022539096,0.000044179134,3.5757415e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006191507,0.0000067444385,0.00020460683,0.000030223155,0.000010668574,8.332645e-7,0.030734181,6.436616e-8,0.0001351231,0.9603176,0.00003571866,0.007905099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006604573,0.00009382457,0.0046693096,0.00010083201,0.00002951368,0.000002474221,0.0011885726,0.000030044532,0.00012791311,0.99287444,0.0001881293,0.00003446985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045987043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005019854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032556873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004303163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065424565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893737531","doi":"10.1007/s11238-018-9673-9","title":"Sunk ‘Decision Points’: a theory of the endowment effect and present bias","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment effect; Situational ethics; Sunk costs; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Endowment; Mechanism (biology); Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Inference; Prospect theory; Positive economics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0818551225695389,"score_gpt":0.381343428437957,"score_spread":0.29948830586841807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893737531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823967,0.0006515002,0.012159648,0.000114804534,0.0010539228,0.00043614366,0.000022057742,0.000025945186,0.0031392279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785626,0.00007324505,0.0012534347,0.00021863647,0.00014681862,0.000008786332,6.462287e-7,0.000019529312,0.00042266847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952494,0.0013900693,0.0010483033,0.00080430385,0.0011897539,0.0003181779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704697,0.027188957,0.00044818345,0.0014367139,0.00026527068,0.00019113679],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021777641,0.00029373035,0.00058801513,0.0003121666,0.0004741706,0.00030520337,0.0009802629,0.00017002072,0.0005925437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009304719,0.00014673355,0.0002260809,0.0005205479,0.00096515095,0.00032540437,0.0011117208,0.00020825371,0.00022503162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002550372,0.000070091286,0.0028430682,0.0000025790634,0.000011287185,0.0000039606275,0.0004953779,0.000006609078,0.00048337717,0.032477837,0.0013251738,0.95973027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009976301,0.00064475636,0.018253729,0.00016764246,0.00004293025,0.000055621887,0.00037143927,0.00022279994,0.0052789696,0.96745723,0.0063247113,0.00018255462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010019863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013999022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030213421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043237622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963142712","doi":"10.1007/s11238-017-9612-1","title":"Confidence biases and learning among intuitive Bayesians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Contrarian; Overconfidence effect; Bayesian probability; Task (project management); Perception; Conservatism; Computer science; Phenomenon; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Probabilistic logic; Psychology; Machine learning; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13014408484338472,"score_gpt":0.42261229900778424,"score_spread":0.2924682141643995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963142712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9369624,0.0011812425,0.05693768,0.00006471758,0.0009853309,0.0002674832,0.000048407113,0.000068940804,0.0034837818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960969,0.0007552928,0.0016831746,0.00009642928,0.00014725217,0.000014230688,0.000008549256,0.00003140164,0.0011667849],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534273,0.0008835235,0.001008675,0.0015395646,0.00088077335,0.00034474002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97536486,0.021447742,0.0010354243,0.0014963577,0.0003494321,0.00030619002],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014311063,0.00045438777,0.0009507346,0.0005170982,0.0011194985,0.0026674843,0.0013261206,0.0005366246,0.00038580815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030709729,0.00033767632,0.00020089041,0.00011056843,0.001025872,0.0005764138,0.0030333665,0.0012705937,0.00018098869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004055441,0.000029386883,0.0035393233,0.0000051983266,0.000013982624,0.00006923367,0.0010435696,0.0004017049,0.000019526238,0.010351078,0.00042158502,0.98369986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000307399,0.000126997,0.017119521,0.00080324244,0.000050995375,0.000044031556,0.0014240888,0.0022213697,0.00006365145,0.9758726,0.001536419,0.00042970528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083255065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057985108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98327017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038349226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011292054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119266273","doi":"10.1007/s11238-020-09791-z","title":"Measuring rationality: percentages vs expenditures","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Measure (data warehouse); Variety (cybernetics); Sign (mathematics); Economics; Econometrics; Work (physics); Sensitivity (control systems); Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05383645305722129,"score_gpt":0.24644283128394817,"score_spread":0.19260637822672688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119266273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92119896,0.006311653,0.046878844,0.0001798802,0.0004371284,0.000053283344,0.000052255407,0.000024043535,0.02486396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963057,0.0005960863,0.0011621187,0.0004365672,0.000121057565,0.0000046625883,0.0000131177785,0.000010807673,0.0013498667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992295,0.00002856198,0.00029453723,0.00029633826,0.000021695021,0.0001293739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.0002885549,0.00007733874,0.00023257837,0.0000144368905,0.000059776674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010496543,0.0000874589,0.00021403292,0.000052745207,0.00014968649,0.00009172518,0.000080774735,0.000056548004,0.0014268971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001408801,0.00009275702,0.000061412684,0.000029103549,0.000043332424,0.00019914657,0.00008866418,0.00006762094,0.0001924147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010325697,0.000020452198,0.0013016937,0.0000051388024,0.00001467989,0.0000051037755,0.00031303865,0.000048137106,0.00006342548,0.9909749,0.00026300122,0.0068871593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032627175,0.000013643659,0.004948435,0.000013199974,0.000002685352,0.000015538062,0.0003125982,0.00011114992,0.00064235495,0.97146696,0.022023829,0.00012331434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000065045915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005252329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07510676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023016857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010095688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192066814","doi":"10.1007/s11238-012-9293-8","title":"Pareto utility","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Isoelastic utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Pareto principle; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Subjective expected utility; Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Mathematical optimization; Function (biology); Exponential function; Exponential utility; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0801050099982059,"score_gpt":0.3952288934776774,"score_spread":0.3151238834794715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192066814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74897414,0.0010466323,0.22921656,0.000026594711,0.00042735867,0.00006447064,0.000003834934,0.00002594971,0.020214431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963236,0.0002561622,0.0024492927,0.00017673399,0.00011349866,0.0000019550055,0.000001867072,0.0000047286744,0.00067216053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984076,0.0003018596,0.000331141,0.0002127487,0.00055094174,0.00019570044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629176,0.0029207687,0.000088146306,0.00043174793,0.000091026326,0.00017653858],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010103222,0.00008490516,0.00014981099,0.00011455575,0.00017404874,0.00009827769,0.00019769324,0.000068240144,0.0009596011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025510779,0.00005292631,0.000047512232,0.0003164204,0.000081102924,0.00055250514,0.00009994625,0.00006481417,0.0005608167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025342952,0.000032132357,0.048521698,2.434176e-7,0.0000019514498,6.621827e-7,0.0004371051,0.000017397302,0.00001721115,0.08033804,0.0038909432,0.8664892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015960357,0.000020520843,0.12124775,0.0000037637417,0.0000057536417,0.000010819485,0.00032163385,0.0004915466,0.00016988777,0.81339896,0.06408581,0.000083939056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019658194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001218094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86640525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004685093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010340668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241625290","doi":"10.1007/s11238-004-5641-7","title":"The dynamic stability of coalitionist behaviour for two-strategy bimatrix games","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stability (learning theory); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.029289359964888618,"score_gpt":0.28302498621405237,"score_spread":0.25373562624916374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241625290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9339902,0.0018119152,0.062216315,0.000051368737,0.00021015445,0.00027025814,0.00017633307,0.000018964729,0.0012545291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993504,0.000058765498,0.00037627263,0.000016779068,0.000025987847,0.000020028107,0.0000074443806,0.000010922259,0.00013338018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989741,0.00005475666,0.0005399495,0.00023321777,0.00003109773,0.0001669083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827975,0.001067831,0.0002572732,0.00031201553,0.000039796243,0.000043334923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045411657,0.00009950403,0.00025381884,0.00005170405,0.0002942822,0.000069529924,0.00015591476,0.000057691264,0.00003263311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003309883,0.000078253885,0.00009726216,0.000083921586,0.0002051641,0.00009618367,0.000032095628,0.00006830315,0.000024536965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036830394,0.000049474653,0.0012872146,0.000021073201,0.000009476609,2.9995195e-7,0.00022539867,0.000086687476,0.00012388344,0.9936986,0.0000056099743,0.0041239653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009303108,0.00014539987,0.0038620352,0.000030521234,0.0000070331953,0.000005714774,0.00049727,0.00013842674,0.00068463135,0.99334204,0.00025912208,0.000097478194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003182343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025190311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065360256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033609173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015716134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31911007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376138165","doi":"10.1007/s11238-023-09934-y","title":"The precautionary principle when project implementation capacity is congestible","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Postponement; Planner; Scope (computer science); Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Operations research; Business; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.16073581390796507,"score_gpt":0.3502594132150123,"score_spread":0.18952359930704724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376138165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99042356,0.00057106075,0.0008276985,0.00079800206,0.00031019686,0.00027052427,0.00036306257,0.000060157454,0.0063757277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932206,0.0033512607,0.00044769095,0.00082992204,0.00016945618,0.00008143113,0.00006599333,0.000023967828,0.0018096269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914116,0.000025356012,0.00033686496,0.00024543938,0.000024919806,0.00022628103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989627,0.00061247393,0.00013534343,0.00023534645,0.0000136087165,0.000040531224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021488725,0.00009171152,0.00014467334,0.00012757079,0.00042585956,0.00009865407,0.00012651613,0.000055713033,0.00032656587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012767193,0.00007892493,0.00004600502,0.00014013144,0.00007590487,0.00019285311,0.00012015468,0.000070669776,0.00073650276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009654515,0.000011126973,0.00608216,0.00001006,0.000015611642,6.362829e-7,0.0026116814,0.000005825606,0.000009091923,0.96532965,0.008754498,0.017073134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029858967,0.00003793243,0.020635301,0.0000064990645,0.0000028385484,0.000003852672,0.00054907065,0.00085212325,0.000087597844,0.8421665,0.13525686,0.00010283418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009119922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059642007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12650236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003058206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010358293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9466499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411349214","doi":"10.1007/s11238-025-10048-w","title":"Payment schemes for finitely repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Mathematical economics; Dilemma; Payment; Game theory; Superrationality; Mathematics; Economics; Actuarial science; Computer science; Law and economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0669329766000516,"score_gpt":0.4109754526165244,"score_spread":0.3440424760164728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411349214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65496176,0.00044593855,0.33907598,0.00047122667,0.00015995256,0.00037057995,0.000025538578,0.00005945824,0.004429578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98587525,0.000035771165,0.0049058944,0.0006326852,0.00004050898,0.00010581618,0.0000075414537,0.0000084200165,0.008388108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980024,0.00024525562,0.0005965598,0.0005620658,0.00037604853,0.00021766384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98318046,0.0155696,0.00014463531,0.00076890684,0.00024563592,0.00009075159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066279816,0.000156006,0.00028449777,0.00025951874,0.00040120873,0.00022806517,0.0005030103,0.00009713019,0.00031416587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076325,0.00010434316,0.00011860712,0.00059829775,0.00018168284,0.00018404056,0.00020850638,0.00009771735,0.00012515586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006532171,0.00004665822,0.00020495882,0.0000027142967,0.000009924403,5.187868e-7,0.00010829501,0.000012673155,0.00076905056,0.5992056,0.0046554175,0.39433095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049082685,0.000054621058,0.0020772477,0.000036789497,0.000017758555,0.0000019700494,0.00034401886,0.000277932,0.003642042,0.7850515,0.20790768,0.00009757637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001250593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016556415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39423335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013693755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004169004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9137367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412588131","doi":"10.1007/s11238-025-10073-9","title":"A duality between utility transforms and probability distortions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Duality (order theory); Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Utility theory; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.10523689138528741,"score_gpt":0.41825811575637145,"score_spread":0.31302122437108404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412588131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8876761,0.00023550486,0.107698746,0.00024221349,0.00023081715,0.0002419898,0.00006854994,0.000046720714,0.0035593603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981323,0.000026755499,0.0013801678,0.00012027928,0.00002437919,0.000008983259,0.0000035138748,0.0000050694784,0.0002985777],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972777,0.00037729455,0.00092055777,0.0007705418,0.00043407845,0.00021984517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123585,0.0075086514,0.00012581203,0.0008097662,0.00015114572,0.00016877083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01266882,0.00018187248,0.00046340187,0.00022088799,0.00047077084,0.00030633717,0.00038003395,0.0001560068,0.00020137388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038187397,0.00012027974,0.0001238634,0.00047837125,0.00046085494,0.00039978384,0.00023938039,0.0001996038,0.00004186143],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000318352,0.000065260065,0.037517034,0.0000040671057,0.000006110262,0.0000011727317,0.0002217416,0.000001630178,0.000014887682,0.029178571,0.00027653566,0.9323946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029392465,0.000039640538,0.21818627,0.000026939939,0.000025383039,0.0000026208609,0.00021879759,0.000067775065,0.00005372085,0.775118,0.0058630314,0.000103909515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014966848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043367007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93229073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036077163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006355959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49048656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413195541","doi":"10.1007/s11238-025-10083-7","title":"Oriented data-generating processes: a categorization of ROC curves","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Receiver operating characteristic; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Data mining; Econometrics; Pattern recognition (psychology)","score_opus":0.026292291034637986,"score_gpt":0.31295091938331565,"score_spread":0.28665862834867767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413195541","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022922378,0.0021798818,0.9742131,0.000054845696,0.00009639047,0.000053159554,0.0000031787233,0.000038991428,0.0004380314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615154,0.00044395908,0.037646275,0.00028152368,0.000012068001,0.0000026286168,0.000014443378,0.000002137178,0.000081567516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993304,0.00006628046,0.00017979223,0.00024267728,0.00010909238,0.000071735376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989887,0.0003579647,0.00005460955,0.00043579796,0.00013987039,0.000023043083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089364,0.00005887166,0.0000980197,0.000059861242,0.000084380066,0.00004195658,0.0004201091,0.000029577057,0.0000031081113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056168693,0.00004625026,0.000007220105,0.00042813033,0.00002664707,0.00036144545,0.0003040355,0.00004579177,0.0000016316984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003605113,0.000033583103,0.00006941267,0.00014125218,0.000006413975,7.641987e-7,0.00024856415,0.00020915194,0.0011671326,0.7006224,0.00039592554,0.29706934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024015187,0.000053153042,0.000086769556,0.00081406464,0.000014316917,0.0000034131476,0.0000598381,0.26656327,0.004840626,0.7269335,0.0002805619,0.0001103568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000033568776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023695004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93859303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000032354753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009673281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18860309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415566272","doi":"10.1007/s11238-025-10102-7","title":"Comparative dynamics in a dynamic oligopoly model of capital accumulation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Oligopoly; Capital accumulation; Best response; Nash equilibrium; Differential game; Path (computing); Epsilon-equilibrium; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.03858308199944627,"score_gpt":0.2986092226643149,"score_spread":0.2600261406648686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415566272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7411312,0.00078442274,0.24221711,0.000022333425,0.000084929176,0.00009245873,0.00007195383,0.000006494925,0.015589122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796313,0.00013760013,0.001393773,0.0000469473,0.0000036183499,0.000005000484,0.000009981085,0.0000052131877,0.0004347487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991772,0.000015851148,0.0004623707,0.00021998429,0.00001242626,0.00011215286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993617,0.00027687108,0.00013764855,0.00018614825,0.000014602791,0.000023062432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076222786,0.00008999338,0.00034577804,0.00025545128,0.00004112121,0.000017704451,0.00010283222,0.00007491201,0.000028082552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047225563,0.00009842108,0.00004526466,0.00010961615,0.00007558302,0.00016961306,0.000069785856,0.00007320655,0.000012134942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026823545,0.000034462268,0.0012826781,0.00000905283,0.000011485543,1.7665023e-7,0.0008240602,0.015357895,0.000019279609,0.97853595,0.0000056499775,0.0036510697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032038253,0.0000133236945,0.0013395709,0.000017846389,0.0000017105707,2.1276225e-7,0.00031909253,0.4224994,0.000024500914,0.57540154,0.0000097137545,0.00005272137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039668463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014142948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40714148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010438791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014759471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4013495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}