{"meta":{"query_hash":"97787ea6304a","filters":{"venue":"Think"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/97787ea6304a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Think"},"results":[{"id":"W2041487990","doi":"10.1017/s1477175610000163","title":"WAS ANDREW CARNEGIE GENEROUS?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Think","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Virtue; Character (mathematics); Tact; History; Classics; Economic history; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037595386815958524,"score_gpt":0.23888244160800748,"score_spread":0.20128705479204895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041487990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5754198,0.00016703796,0.0000053175695,0.0019621938,0.0009046803,0.00004161361,0.0000061650403,0.00017142593,0.42132178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782673,0.00001539899,0.000269535,0.00053617347,0.00078969746,0.0000040453797,0.000027342538,0.000010611674,0.02007991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954563,0.000033473996,0.00009637954,0.00009230365,0.00011142058,0.00012081538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993383,0.000037768,0.00003949503,0.00046020187,0.00007774207,0.000046436424],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030022347,0.00006316431,0.0000707521,0.000038601098,0.00036057134,0.0008691282,0.00038009943,0.00004587398,0.0011986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007746111,0.000052030406,0.000034476903,0.000016529943,0.000090798756,0.0007409422,0.00006127742,0.0004438016,0.00028330632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036914207,0.00003739939,0.00019853542,0.000004419367,0.000013248269,0.0000015309838,0.03839117,7.86506e-7,0.0016193718,0.8973619,0.05139665,0.0109712975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000124483,0.000016753442,0.0006234924,0.00000422155,0.000008636761,0.0000028389668,0.0006191698,0.00007897097,0.00018200491,0.014479109,0.9837554,0.00010491046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054777705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022153568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93235874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000074122686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026174519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765632582","doi":"10.1017/s1477175617000173","title":"THE WORST ARGUMENT IN THE WORLD – DEFENDED","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Think","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. Thomas University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument map; Medicine","score_opus":0.07977520488007983,"score_gpt":0.26599976483932863,"score_spread":0.1862245599592488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765632582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010448358,0.00014733305,9.587225e-7,0.022439184,0.00075961335,0.00008927182,0.0000013689241,0.000014897725,0.966099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95987535,0.000006289018,0.0000055003593,0.0008552564,0.0004036998,0.0000074599943,2.3744182e-7,0.0000021740975,0.038844045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994941,0.00003660585,0.00008385285,0.00008266228,0.00016817464,0.00013463304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993803,0.0001115267,0.00004786596,0.00042916802,0.000012179903,0.000018987643],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046745918,0.00004880796,0.000048654518,0.000015673962,0.0025147866,0.00045078166,0.0007588612,0.00000813474,0.00019853422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005063865,0.000021636457,0.000032393655,0.000014503418,0.00039265942,0.00012384854,0.000042138054,0.0001341396,0.00019763724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038471367,0.000015075753,0.000022099593,7.4630236e-7,0.0000013538303,0.0000027926724,0.026684405,4.3845628e-7,0.0000011589589,0.9594732,0.012498673,0.0012962394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056359895,0.00001106737,0.0007366396,0.0000046714567,0.0000016392353,2.4855862e-7,0.0005478852,0.00001676147,0.0000031483569,0.18421821,0.8143632,0.00004016698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001751264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077855834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.949427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023673418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000093916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386549080","doi":"10.1017/s1477175623000222","title":"Jordan Peterson's Confusion over Religious Symbolism: A Lesson from Cain and Abel","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Think","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Confusion; Reading (process); Civilization; Philosophy; Simple (philosophy); Literature; Religious studies; Sociology; Theology; History; Art; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Archaeology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022186544885877353,"score_gpt":0.3281702936453863,"score_spread":0.30598374875950896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386549080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.967699,0.00020148604,0.000013984489,0.012330706,0.0006727894,0.00012854689,0.000016229988,0.0002845226,0.01865272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878054,0.0040815314,0.000075049815,0.0017742887,0.0002784845,0.000007048291,0.000019063726,0.000011590238,0.0059475317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999072,0.00011295039,0.00011412888,0.00019244819,0.00027508388,0.00023335792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942577,0.00022542324,0.000050623148,0.0001347889,0.00003789216,0.00012552993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003064586,0.0000831284,0.00012728783,0.00004493501,0.0005555062,0.0001361376,0.00012534935,0.00011776599,0.00017328985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001249685,0.000079221565,0.000072537914,0.00022058429,0.00013591516,0.00012848468,0.00005047191,0.00017157981,0.00034192528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001846007,0.00003272109,0.0019383382,0.0000073120946,0.00004494363,0.00003541563,0.41067144,0.000003979767,0.0020784456,0.03421304,0.54806125,0.0028946337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010952341,0.000064711596,0.030867169,0.0001135543,0.00006180792,0.0000036632857,0.08944532,0.0011515806,0.00019074393,0.085217625,0.79126364,0.0005249672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028477686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018140223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32122612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005568408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057323814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97799176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411426840","doi":"10.1017/s1477175625000168","title":"Vice-Charging and Epistemic Vices of Consequence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Think","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Vice president; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.040367214234454614,"score_gpt":0.27684798149628,"score_spread":0.23648076726182538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411426840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6361732,0.003370494,0.00007165582,0.003886229,0.0007870834,0.00014319585,0.000022561833,0.00008235688,0.35546324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873174,0.00012864379,0.00010620896,0.0009915313,0.000082404695,0.0000028419931,0.0000027479698,0.0000048635534,0.011363392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994878,0.00004889531,0.00017150096,0.00012263359,0.0000623574,0.00010682093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994541,0.00022414808,0.00007966512,0.00014018962,0.000082547194,0.00001939092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002579585,0.00007556117,0.00017820485,0.00005362728,0.00015520432,0.000033005133,0.000095763855,0.000042026015,0.000097192766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035963043,0.000065616914,0.000033192384,0.000021574608,0.0006419076,0.0000876761,0.000036021145,0.00013220981,0.0000134732945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073627275,0.000011712845,0.00022617046,0.0002521579,0.000032671927,0.0000032793503,0.029793726,4.945926e-7,0.0011572764,0.967573,0.00027497835,0.00066719874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007646995,0.00010550679,0.0010787294,0.00074361946,0.00017933812,0.000015114042,0.021608949,0.00015652734,0.0074308305,0.8036523,0.16388798,0.00037641003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046424876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043281796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35114416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008330127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048512124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26757804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}