{"meta":{"query_hash":"6e8778abade4","filters":{"venue":"Thinking & Reasoning"},"cohort_total":29,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":29,"exported":29,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6e8778abade4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Thinking+%26+Reasoning"},"results":[{"id":"W1972145739","doi":"10.1080/13546780701679764","title":"On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive bias; Cognition; Argument (complex analysis); Cognitive psychology; Confirmation bias; Response bias; Social psychology; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.04949511825641475,"score_gpt":0.3181974358631981,"score_spread":0.26870231760678337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972145739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978604,0.00006650364,0.0006892176,0.000033758442,0.0000041708404,0.000017981714,0.00003207841,0.000008139215,0.001287771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994487,0.00002308085,0.000357631,0.000014943987,0.0000052356168,0.000021042486,0.00003953655,0.000004015037,0.00008573662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963297,0.0012031234,0.00061363145,0.0005816499,0.0010375865,0.0002343518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7423477,0.20049642,0.03395613,0.013430825,0.0057191537,0.004049779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011212432,0.0006429471,0.00041832824,0.0028433409,0.00039350803,0.0013415241,0.00053362345,0.0012320393,0.0032800806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10645924,0.0003320761,0.00053803844,0.00076282764,0.0020513828,0.002523526,0.001954624,0.0012264608,0.0006242343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010362047,0.0004138231,0.97498626,0.0000770302,0.0001531296,0.00012383393,0.0016943413,0.00077580585,0.0033511857,0.0005922013,0.00009797173,0.01669823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005523259,0.0009851854,0.98571277,0.00004826039,0.00006701071,0.00057470583,0.0008630101,0.004286069,0.0038085436,0.0032198888,0.0003325232,0.0000467329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050066126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005605812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011212432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026169734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003801769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05929774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991848957","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2015.1016450","title":"Better but still biased: Analytic cognitive style and belief bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive bias; Cognition; Analytic reasoning; Cognitive style; Cognitive psychology; Heuristic; Confirmation bias; Style (visual arts); Debiasing; Response bias; Deductive reasoning; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.21927638075755815,"score_gpt":0.3909617875035358,"score_spread":0.17168540674597763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991848957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99119604,0.0003418362,0.0021698542,0.00042440166,0.00002192958,0.00001149912,0.000045392502,0.000013522605,0.0057754056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853694,0.00009854559,0.00084070355,0.00011854175,0.000028715187,0.000007748994,0.000030179392,0.000007951616,0.00033073634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982085,0.00073965616,0.00014335594,0.00026112996,0.000521729,0.00012562725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94483703,0.037880648,0.009064545,0.0042104293,0.002297305,0.0017101697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039634146,0.0002864474,0.0003087973,0.0008925399,0.00023721627,0.0021755002,0.00031052643,0.0006595596,0.0036579692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049001556,0.00015476218,0.0003251211,0.0005896341,0.0012649321,0.0014532034,0.00087944366,0.0011075832,0.00037290403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014605025,0.0010039936,0.87831384,0.00019716163,0.00056895486,0.00032921077,0.0067588943,0.0019799117,0.011729476,0.014162591,0.00066000805,0.08283534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009973892,0.00057410344,0.9422385,0.000094817864,0.0001933541,0.0007162845,0.0020145548,0.005828577,0.0027851039,0.043848775,0.0015438242,0.00006243217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000555242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044352212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039634146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002883559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002691387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020960748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994669758","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2013.875942","title":"Belief bias is stronger when reasoning is more difficult","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Debiasing; Belief structure; Dual (grammatical number); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.09637316939967731,"score_gpt":0.363925256305812,"score_spread":0.2675520869061347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994669758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99563557,0.00032629163,0.0020111967,0.00017921795,0.000017393017,0.000021991698,0.00004425839,0.00001613571,0.0017479411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983473,0.000106628,0.0011810339,0.000112314425,0.00002499586,0.000015829834,0.000047416845,0.0000106120615,0.000153907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597126,0.0013815134,0.00043672614,0.0007563127,0.0012142417,0.00023992066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8404381,0.11445706,0.030508734,0.010001715,0.0029020256,0.0016923307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078090397,0.00051200745,0.0007599917,0.0011803152,0.0003032705,0.0020708889,0.00044916663,0.001117946,0.0044358117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06849802,0.00052717305,0.0006166973,0.00077470485,0.0014962879,0.0015630263,0.001548256,0.0017581701,0.00024503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010024018,0.0019214487,0.7717165,0.001580521,0.0020049508,0.00093663123,0.009214073,0.0013792269,0.10684892,0.00456679,0.0006050294,0.089201935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038733703,0.0015017347,0.9694294,0.00012331875,0.0004523193,0.0012650369,0.0015909452,0.0016447017,0.0133009665,0.009038496,0.0011782446,0.00008743309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042195202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005412989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078090397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033233644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023561741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041298687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995081088","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2013.844729","title":"Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":878,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Test (biology); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Reliability (semiconductor); Variance (accounting); Information processing; Reflection (computer programming); Dual (grammatical number); Prime (order theory); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.0971559523513711,"score_gpt":0.39984466099706467,"score_spread":0.3026887086456936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995081088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98282456,0.00022415115,0.0078186765,0.00025037798,0.00005882654,0.0010744602,0.00086521334,0.00017495126,0.006708746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629879,0.00034025975,0.027521677,0.00036105476,0.0000752148,0.0010191592,0.0019287731,0.00006824503,0.005697779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981616,0.00039292837,0.0003239856,0.00019763823,0.00077949057,0.00014429532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921123,0.0020933961,0.0027930415,0.0007764459,0.0016616439,0.0005631547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024430496,0.0008406258,0.0006879269,0.0016036708,0.000269993,0.00078791066,0.000850795,0.0009331039,0.0028038053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010506804,0.00036551213,0.00082883507,0.000700021,0.00027934727,0.0010698197,0.0010375971,0.0016110429,0.00098942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019782523,0.007862624,0.75533044,0.00033410205,0.00060660637,0.0007621941,0.0017873996,0.0032084181,0.027102437,0.0013885822,0.0067036347,0.19293518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021614919,0.0047141253,0.9661759,0.000059704074,0.00014319408,0.0019457471,0.00029835955,0.0073436457,0.013588118,0.0016260272,0.0037833261,0.000105664265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006602517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089968805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028038053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024485207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051575806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012920201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999129463","doi":"10.1080/13546780903135722","title":"A judgement analysis of social perceptions of attitudes and ability","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Overfitting; Judgement; Attractiveness; Perception; Regression analysis; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial neural network","score_opus":0.023215201591387402,"score_gpt":0.3618854664482291,"score_spread":0.3386702648568417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999129463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963348,0.000012552191,0.001001326,0.000010871089,0.000004520435,0.000055940494,0.00016334721,0.00000939784,0.0024072435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976804,0.000013199172,0.0011904852,0.00000855906,0.000006612346,0.00008157487,0.00026545502,0.0000047016215,0.0007489191],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810034,0.000883665,0.00010323654,0.000203886,0.0005583496,0.00015046577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831473,0.010824587,0.0016244795,0.0010299751,0.0023106188,0.0010629782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030479147,0.00037036827,0.00035892767,0.0019279949,0.00070895016,0.0009079942,0.00031237298,0.00041607823,0.0065880176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019718722,0.00016288746,0.0007202987,0.0009795247,0.00067613786,0.0005960884,0.0009597002,0.00068730296,0.00062649895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032994628,0.0019126703,0.78521484,0.00032977565,0.0005089795,0.00039965427,0.02579162,0.001972017,0.046474997,0.0023665368,0.0015467886,0.13018265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033000386,0.0010725853,0.9866238,0.000011779538,0.000039393217,0.00011648839,0.0035947242,0.0031823933,0.0033900428,0.0009124629,0.0009720943,0.000051176085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031301142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036704873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065880176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057967997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030059856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022039115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044003764","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2013.791642","title":"When emotions improve reasoning: The possible roles of relevance and utility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.050805653278423506,"score_gpt":0.3322174880239647,"score_spread":0.2814118347455412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044003764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021257,0.004746561,0.033533666,0.006182932,0.0002815898,0.00014532814,0.00011151254,0.00015379091,0.052718896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884614,0.0008543571,0.009401968,0.00038347568,0.000059567534,0.00003615908,0.00004380484,0.000040747902,0.0007184854],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344194,0.003418803,0.0004413459,0.0007166354,0.0014022894,0.0005789809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694456,0.022993404,0.003275681,0.0021185887,0.001377214,0.0007895803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006696475,0.00042512646,0.0004798769,0.0007459188,0.00046052822,0.004376145,0.00055599294,0.0011958339,0.00358124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055253845,0.00040262932,0.00097234943,0.00055203383,0.0028564348,0.0053123916,0.0018739098,0.0016881042,0.00033487412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052983784,0.002256661,0.1093088,0.004808478,0.0012970497,0.0022665672,0.02146705,0.014420288,0.07143276,0.17587854,0.0033433572,0.58822197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005573875,0.0014905198,0.24930525,0.0010682858,0.0012152039,0.0012163025,0.008011647,0.016748827,0.02722815,0.67814785,0.014806276,0.00020427554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041038074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059554185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006696475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011198854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067499996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035414755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044641675","doi":"10.1080/13546780500172490","title":"Conditional probability and pragmatic conditionals: Dissociating truth and effectiveness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Conditional probability; Inference; Regular conditional probability; Statement (logic); Conditional expectation; Conditional independence; Law of total probability; Mathematics; Conditional probability distribution; Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Random variable; Epistemology; Posterior probability; Philosophy; Probability mass function","score_opus":0.04135405219078417,"score_gpt":0.35201243388704573,"score_spread":0.3106583816962616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044641675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195207,0.0008136325,0.05405298,0.000932314,0.00006304392,0.00012724623,0.0005981109,0.00024252028,0.023649508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99582654,0.00008785254,0.0035945212,0.000052398747,0.00003095143,0.0000311643,0.00016095435,0.000035734203,0.00017984564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98962855,0.00537243,0.00066796155,0.0013935915,0.0024961259,0.00044144556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.725879,0.23780671,0.018368594,0.00851994,0.0073156366,0.0021100945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145115685,0.00059574284,0.00075122836,0.003086106,0.00056621985,0.0041163634,0.00089111016,0.0016050303,0.008648989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23234119,0.00057664304,0.00069042965,0.0022379041,0.0035332162,0.0065056747,0.0034845022,0.0017774657,0.0005708399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007449925,0.00079191156,0.45291525,0.0021845768,0.0012989547,0.00095892156,0.023451267,0.030309469,0.023302339,0.16078782,0.004294249,0.29225537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016166289,0.00052965584,0.685732,0.00029903758,0.00044776953,0.00054761244,0.0021756082,0.0908484,0.0053959116,0.2111105,0.0023553802,0.00039647074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025481174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013651671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0145115685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010911926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054147537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07674545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053520992","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2012.687892","title":"Effects of perspective and belief on analytic reasoning in a scientific reasoning task","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Test (biology); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Task (project management); Scale (ratio); Artificial intelligence; Moral reasoning; Computer science","score_opus":0.03947755928593623,"score_gpt":0.35931031318835016,"score_spread":0.31983275390241395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053520992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99801433,0.000043949465,0.00048559697,0.00003752034,0.000009213626,0.000026620271,0.000016749933,0.000008664775,0.0013574383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965322,0.00009488629,0.002639258,0.00007931986,0.000020436952,0.00008195647,0.00006384291,0.000016889348,0.0004712409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955408,0.0022452308,0.00033590267,0.0005466341,0.0011219108,0.00020956522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8566841,0.121095054,0.013973323,0.0040610647,0.0013257816,0.0028606285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006501706,0.00076216314,0.00062372285,0.0007432997,0.00038743808,0.0020586418,0.0005558154,0.0009718816,0.004577287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06796233,0.00051582244,0.00043616432,0.00043217992,0.0011559377,0.0015627539,0.0017222475,0.0019734174,0.0003104749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.041106533,0.02283471,0.4543585,0.001307775,0.00136757,0.0011312756,0.02109944,0.0032250779,0.3446318,0.00387152,0.0007266321,0.104339264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015374774,0.015161615,0.93366504,0.00015250595,0.00057937,0.0007104089,0.0032202348,0.009709241,0.02677989,0.0071000457,0.0012008444,0.00018325042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031020064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055495335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006501706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033382795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031214408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034384727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059176211","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2014.895915","title":"Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Process (computing); Dual (grammatical number); Psychology; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Creativity; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.026087810539078507,"score_gpt":0.37156233579437825,"score_spread":0.34547452525529976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059176211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49226412,0.0035993312,0.37227786,0.011725405,0.0001656493,0.00011760519,0.00011683083,0.00014025663,0.119592994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772136,0.00050346024,0.02020602,0.00023656292,0.00007713148,0.000043269727,0.000024247798,0.000014637254,0.0016809575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975611,0.0011975076,0.00009561225,0.00048143277,0.00048815503,0.00017620351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863446,0.01004522,0.001252108,0.0013397184,0.0004463439,0.00057203934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043007415,0.00050780014,0.00041726706,0.002568469,0.00055489835,0.005109682,0.0011792391,0.0016016375,0.0039258823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099410685,0.00026142926,0.00084453094,0.0009429407,0.009065911,0.009901167,0.0026768413,0.0027699408,0.00032961747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117842006,0.00014449243,0.009248349,0.00015932016,0.000045689365,0.00057632616,0.009519,0.0030265285,0.0019947886,0.94516057,0.00025263717,0.02975463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002576646,0.000058049667,0.0038799318,0.00004786858,0.000015995709,0.00083259476,0.0011145702,0.006775836,0.0005265775,0.9846128,0.0020899465,0.000020085128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032120926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023055881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005109682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009698277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008343013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022744775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064616710","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2014.942367","title":"Explaining the gambler's fallacy: Testing a gestalt explanation versus the “law of small numbers”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Western University; King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Gestalt psychology; Psychology; Closure (psychology); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Perception","score_opus":0.058629117070252285,"score_gpt":0.23074066032289492,"score_spread":0.17211154325264263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064616710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778805,0.00009449078,0.015803635,0.0010069079,0.000047419064,0.00008229003,0.000043253196,0.00004239432,0.0049990914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953797,0.000047628062,0.0037253867,0.00021014427,0.000024921606,0.000058137928,0.00006333005,0.000013130811,0.00047756804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495935,0.0025885946,0.00035241715,0.0007724022,0.0010586185,0.00026864972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91501373,0.064871155,0.01232559,0.0050671506,0.0017214187,0.0010008776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011427299,0.0008305719,0.0008985877,0.0015422131,0.00071766716,0.0017732615,0.0010917473,0.0017622369,0.007440699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08597145,0.00044683815,0.0009558407,0.00040852342,0.0042988877,0.004955664,0.0025396056,0.0019466524,0.0006324867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0137982955,0.004251192,0.6555535,0.0005750773,0.00059373013,0.001856275,0.021328297,0.013278395,0.0076872027,0.12540641,0.0019218888,0.15374969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012358356,0.004528283,0.37044963,0.00025229083,0.00034493377,0.002715361,0.008004565,0.17855348,0.00728505,0.42154962,0.004769681,0.00031131873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015862136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074710546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011427299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064969267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006471669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060434043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066164253","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2012.670752","title":"Belief bias in informal reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Syllogism; Psychology; Task (project management); Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Cognitive psychology; Similarity (geometry); Social psychology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.05332454511842592,"score_gpt":0.33961335761915207,"score_spread":0.28628881250072613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066164253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979886,0.00018628937,0.012545905,0.00023810918,0.000053580163,0.00031310148,0.0000790442,0.00007447941,0.0066234423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895886,0.000081771366,0.008414766,0.00027394143,0.000036386144,0.0003391602,0.00010313454,0.000033636763,0.0011286774],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98907197,0.0052045593,0.0009552522,0.0013040808,0.0029331231,0.00053099485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8572669,0.104394026,0.016681815,0.016434785,0.0030827685,0.0021397504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012790838,0.0007806791,0.0007543568,0.0007125499,0.00041440755,0.00215489,0.0008457449,0.0012704185,0.004828466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10002348,0.00046976082,0.0005129869,0.00041026832,0.0018233332,0.0023994641,0.0024938781,0.0021027646,0.0004602765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024868345,0.020985262,0.19240983,0.0029016072,0.0010936842,0.00086572627,0.026531028,0.0073521673,0.36427543,0.06661513,0.0021860774,0.28991574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006854348,0.023976136,0.5733816,0.00070144486,0.0010411367,0.0021869352,0.003434531,0.044116292,0.13637452,0.18800193,0.01928876,0.00064232986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004765145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035524045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012790838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007144327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005117069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06764525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080983262","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2010.503606","title":"Conditional reasoning under time constraint: Information retrieval and inhibition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Causal inference; Premise; Inference; Constraint (computer-aided design); Modal; Psychology; Computer science; Mental model; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006249378082953072,"score_gpt":0.24510733955068012,"score_spread":0.23885796146772706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080983262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825843,0.00034686553,0.0056022624,0.00012832445,0.000010590858,0.00013198805,0.00017072709,0.000058392332,0.010966569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509805,0.00017966644,0.0025592225,0.000065779794,0.000012636707,0.00008986359,0.00030751218,0.000036680573,0.0016504984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714214,0.00079950294,0.00023533987,0.0004771863,0.0011497119,0.00019603838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97333956,0.018218582,0.0048247664,0.001812944,0.0011702545,0.00063383894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037466288,0.00041803747,0.00067457225,0.0007287154,0.0003030832,0.0017492748,0.0008461214,0.00051226886,0.004123647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04276482,0.00044942854,0.00044941137,0.0007313315,0.00086494896,0.0014687679,0.0011762757,0.0011728392,0.00046456786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009436028,0.0037247855,0.4490812,0.0016531157,0.0006212797,0.0013516492,0.0202095,0.012086913,0.1026524,0.026135173,0.0030809285,0.36996698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001134695,0.0017089543,0.8473775,0.00017712473,0.0008686288,0.0020459124,0.0021646225,0.06307324,0.028085098,0.04634532,0.0067996895,0.00021929004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005807541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030255225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005807541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010265298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011980594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019814312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084288866","doi":"10.1080/13546780600780796","title":"Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":358,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Cognition; Proposition; Cognitive bias; Omitted-variable bias; Variable (mathematics); Cognitive psychology; Variables; Statistics; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025457032009194816,"score_gpt":0.3277243517903294,"score_spread":0.3022673197811346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084288866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948709,0.000054462398,0.0016157659,0.000050829985,0.00000473988,0.000024375262,0.000046551562,0.000017936172,0.0033144841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990287,0.000012917537,0.0006764518,0.000020247333,0.0000037254765,0.000017989245,0.000041021358,0.000007749026,0.00019125752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975248,0.0006966877,0.00026066232,0.00055105326,0.0007705337,0.00019618994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635102,0.019566925,0.0074410136,0.0065448456,0.0016129425,0.0013239763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003518804,0.00023386297,0.00033959595,0.0005972787,0.0003552674,0.0009868564,0.00034279047,0.0002768845,0.0036875408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03459394,0.0002599799,0.00027160638,0.00027424464,0.0016176499,0.0013210896,0.0013313022,0.00068457343,0.00022729764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025532786,0.0007584815,0.8381518,0.00051354273,0.00052636367,0.0002693191,0.0061692726,0.0006269631,0.087028325,0.0057097324,0.00039593424,0.057296913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004112204,0.0003944203,0.9776685,0.000027015185,0.000059073536,0.00036899667,0.0006193608,0.0010621466,0.014170532,0.0048627295,0.0006956155,0.00003040303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048278435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006322456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036875408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021269481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031777346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018609464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087967090","doi":"10.1080/13546780902930917","title":"Inhibiting beliefs demands attention","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Analytic reasoning; Variety (cybernetics); Motivated reasoning; Task (project management); Social psychology; Content (measure theory); Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06805243705929927,"score_gpt":0.3762724253259446,"score_spread":0.3082199882666454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087967090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8961156,0.0007447569,0.02241883,0.002953534,0.00019902854,0.00013401042,0.00014384816,0.00027131455,0.07701912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848763,0.00045980798,0.009039059,0.0011953488,0.0001212359,0.00010234891,0.00018751006,0.00009942954,0.003918912],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739933,0.00059237995,0.00016609413,0.0005489875,0.00097407005,0.0003191948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838304,0.009900299,0.00202868,0.0025263813,0.00088505045,0.0008293013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016749167,0.00069126085,0.00046356107,0.0005036984,0.00039927647,0.0023500167,0.0008624072,0.0014976036,0.0072649503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021649485,0.0005202772,0.00046509426,0.0004164534,0.0010816761,0.0022881462,0.0020055396,0.0018244522,0.0009730565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025767968,0.0020714425,0.07287817,0.0016766121,0.00051565334,0.0013444253,0.0051629576,0.005067101,0.5079202,0.08527712,0.006474225,0.3090354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001279504,0.0023111226,0.42058203,0.0004931474,0.0009597886,0.0021190585,0.0020177704,0.034460034,0.12894155,0.36079678,0.04577675,0.00026247368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018011206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015146941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072649503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010826451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008033396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024303675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117954820","doi":"10.1080/13546780802619248","title":"The role of training, alternative models, and logical necessity in determining confidence in syllogistic reasoning","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Syllogism; Psychology; Representation (politics); Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Affect (linguistics); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05763808930143242,"score_gpt":0.3047740255960552,"score_spread":0.2471359362946228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117954820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978066,0.000092080256,0.0012246514,0.00007159116,0.000005445607,0.000015404114,0.000027777216,0.000015767262,0.0007407092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984517,0.00003623643,0.0011928813,0.000020494272,0.000003456285,0.000013721359,0.000055811943,0.000010068963,0.00021557197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993814,0.0028453972,0.0006180362,0.000917713,0.0014352762,0.00036951256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7665093,0.19598694,0.0230863,0.0075465073,0.0035726952,0.0032983266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009996987,0.00042288486,0.000521314,0.0006641839,0.00027535445,0.0023423755,0.00094719074,0.0014565527,0.0025465798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13142742,0.0006349515,0.00031141704,0.00035760485,0.0012847161,0.0018765659,0.0010995221,0.0015188407,0.00024831033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010649417,0.0037254014,0.80945724,0.00043265618,0.00041422845,0.00036220273,0.005217849,0.008330012,0.07464809,0.0016716011,0.00065426575,0.08443705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014626494,0.002082054,0.9369316,0.00015551315,0.00021152449,0.0004360193,0.0007717108,0.029789597,0.0234256,0.005346262,0.0005956382,0.00010831933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019638948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001986455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009996987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075741485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004712667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052869737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135439319","doi":"10.1080/13546780542000014","title":"Relational integration in older adults","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09151745083876306,"score_gpt":0.32695538536112706,"score_spread":0.235437934522364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135439319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99484175,0.0012937932,0.00014066746,0.00024133014,0.000028071312,0.000028198037,0.0002724383,0.000018869945,0.0031348981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604577,0.0007241443,0.00030139016,0.0002455541,0.000026070797,0.00001984775,0.00036450932,0.0000039668175,0.0022686727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994881,0.00003285448,0.00007789916,0.00013145765,0.00020160925,0.00006804731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801576,0.00028582703,0.0007660276,0.00013278596,0.00042518246,0.0003743078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090945663,0.0007974223,0.0007878649,0.0017969452,0.0010373633,0.0017084464,0.00049252703,0.0010991849,0.007405685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061733755,0.00041582802,0.00042448987,0.0008294244,0.0005023597,0.0018971935,0.0010977178,0.0011320233,0.0009309142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038921522,0.0010211777,0.87914306,0.00029033207,0.000089450965,0.0025207042,0.021309216,0.00016776535,0.004241633,0.0006975443,0.003811173,0.0863188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007241069,0.0013286751,0.9760415,0.0001289503,0.00013957033,0.0067948634,0.0047772783,0.0006065521,0.0009795872,0.0028081452,0.006276624,0.000045830235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01205726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089249415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01205726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068383827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003713421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024774551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800542281","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2018.1459314","title":"Miserliness in human cognition: the interaction of detection, override and mindware","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Cognition; Computer science; Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.08989650816669473,"score_gpt":0.3730028939043947,"score_spread":0.2831063857377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800542281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8801154,0.0009701643,0.10094498,0.003273187,0.000031493604,0.00006868171,0.00006588754,0.00020982636,0.01432034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98947036,0.00011438933,0.0099806655,0.00012759105,0.000023219796,0.00002267326,0.000015600532,0.000023906936,0.00022160787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910484,0.005545882,0.00039560144,0.0012715182,0.0013725464,0.00036595072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9146125,0.06453351,0.010740528,0.0059449044,0.0020511327,0.0021173186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012521557,0.0005907062,0.00078744977,0.003376595,0.000825829,0.006029514,0.0012608046,0.002116106,0.0025098727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06448037,0.001074429,0.00091973814,0.0012719478,0.010958863,0.010913548,0.0031877884,0.0022882856,0.00023559965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012503454,0.0008396254,0.28937575,0.00048658883,0.00070917525,0.001069908,0.021104263,0.040219378,0.013260436,0.48453265,0.0014962854,0.14565566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068641166,0.00035807185,0.14031088,0.00010375158,0.00014731947,0.0010503186,0.0019070266,0.06704781,0.0025606805,0.7852208,0.001024472,0.00020023946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017021528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011516074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012521557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012477908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096531387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06622106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895596350","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2018.1481144","title":"Developmental grey matter changes in superior parietal cortex accompany improved transitive reasoning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Memory and Neural Mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Universidad de La Laguna; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Posterior parietal cortex; Psychology; Transitive relation; Grey matter; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Cortex (anatomy); Voxel; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Neural correlates of consciousness; Neuroscience; Cognition; Magnetic resonance imaging; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Medicine; White matter","score_opus":0.03815569606022492,"score_gpt":0.2809634442185483,"score_spread":0.24280774815832337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895596350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986318,0.00013828654,0.00055832416,0.000039054536,0.00000392553,0.0000053141393,0.00019124719,0.000035333036,0.00039680378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830747,0.00013865213,0.000897924,0.00001793027,0.0000023129908,0.000012033554,0.00014119802,0.000008804348,0.00047363027],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986196,0.000011299462,0.00001277294,0.000057233647,0.000035311714,0.00002150298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999278,0.00012128831,0.0003863356,0.000065208566,0.00006857798,0.00008061126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035254413,0.00025118678,0.0002607007,0.0007058154,0.00012252401,0.0003560321,0.00017757743,0.00028937683,0.0017023125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008658931,0.00028214164,0.00021250566,0.0001977035,0.00054547074,0.00029122178,0.00027396763,0.00035923062,0.00017136865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073089317,0.00014711494,0.18781352,0.00012534995,0.00009986767,0.0029929588,0.0011847054,0.00033966472,0.7828552,0.00067383976,0.00036780367,0.022669153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010866736,0.0001915594,0.9666585,0.0000073856145,0.000022010798,0.0010650028,0.00015365185,0.00027046425,0.031128107,0.00021248226,0.0002746973,0.0000053521244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020553977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031489788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020553977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025614217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032639064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0056948066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214288572","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2021.1999327","title":"Investigating lay evaluations of models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Overfitting; Distrust; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Mean squared prediction error; Mean squared error; Machine learning; Psychology; Function (biology); Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial neural network","score_opus":0.053562441379743815,"score_gpt":0.3362210250929328,"score_spread":0.28265858371318897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214288572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91967523,0.00093834044,0.042208273,0.0024799786,0.00011977722,0.00010590544,0.00013236653,0.000117427044,0.034222648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946077,0.00016219736,0.004399324,0.00016540701,0.000022971419,0.000033009448,0.000059420978,0.000029908906,0.0005200877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808359,0.013706681,0.0006000296,0.0011509844,0.00327991,0.00042654856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8116134,0.15110184,0.013778253,0.011455498,0.010822062,0.0012289187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02638787,0.0008062787,0.0004066475,0.0018210687,0.001154869,0.0059909457,0.000926666,0.0019912082,0.0050320127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22102873,0.0005046646,0.0009014738,0.0005391347,0.0039068772,0.006565655,0.002994403,0.002474402,0.000558911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024480554,0.00041647846,0.19240093,0.0018465625,0.00062819116,0.0015177666,0.5118659,0.015257508,0.021826344,0.07509713,0.0067891576,0.16990592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003284988,0.0027496633,0.18067704,0.0033197918,0.00075066625,0.0026153245,0.40609387,0.10098028,0.018165957,0.21845828,0.065081716,0.00077898393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024220068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013847643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02638787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013738124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061386876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13955408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309971750","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2022.2146191","title":"Insight problem solving ability predicts reduced susceptibility to fake news, bullshit, and overclaiming","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; National Stroke Foundation; Smart Family Foundation; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Information overload; Cognition; Fake news; Identification (biology); Psychology; Information processing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Cognitive psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.02101978709828871,"score_gpt":0.28623990907279295,"score_spread":0.26522012197450423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309971750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99958366,0.000020064766,0.000028597771,0.000023595918,0.0000014527757,0.0000044096787,0.000021963338,0.0000017509121,0.00031459727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995382,0.000026720096,0.00008198994,0.000008937052,0.0000027407366,0.000004749317,0.000060400784,0.0000013025931,0.00027501598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957186,0.00009565635,0.000058916543,0.000079020305,0.00012371417,0.00007087653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988213,0.0031724256,0.0063131726,0.000862873,0.00057650765,0.0008620278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010583814,0.00034832305,0.00029293765,0.0013381814,0.00032074196,0.0010422425,0.00019928819,0.0007155096,0.004326721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013345149,0.00024760087,0.00033055083,0.00042054395,0.0006297262,0.00051700626,0.00059948955,0.0008460205,0.00045286375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013666069,0.00031841634,0.9940363,0.000013772353,0.000030564188,0.000081345235,0.00082247576,0.00008001012,0.0006646953,0.00006396385,0.000077695775,0.0036739341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060559582,0.00017996895,0.998528,0.0000048819593,0.000012509118,0.00024311534,0.0003359748,0.00032102066,0.00017575003,0.00011600326,0.000071861745,0.000004796472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016367923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016708331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004326721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020976065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002038174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014474332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324149497","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2023.2189163","title":"Bullshit blind spots: the roles of miscalibration and information processing in bullshit detection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01589757397525402,"score_gpt":0.2846071918145373,"score_spread":0.26870961783928327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324149497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964671,0.0003351377,0.0007121832,0.00038410904,0.000005684906,0.00001695137,0.000018831577,0.000005436824,0.0020546184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993094,0.0001354068,0.00031588797,0.000079813246,0.000006894615,0.0000069260373,0.000012400476,0.000002783982,0.00013049605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466336,0.0026636967,0.0004703381,0.0004670568,0.0013561182,0.00037933153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84900975,0.096114926,0.036718056,0.009472724,0.00604018,0.0026443722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01014593,0.00029983438,0.00033880933,0.0017146588,0.0010074563,0.00390846,0.0006733471,0.00097070826,0.0020087117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088094994,0.00048328628,0.00044207223,0.00095634727,0.0034664795,0.004112319,0.002365525,0.002188038,0.00012260547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044153002,0.00048247332,0.8745819,0.00031156273,0.00022487789,0.0003738211,0.085565194,0.00028990227,0.0017488265,0.0020814582,0.00021805144,0.033680487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023673309,0.00031894902,0.9638288,0.00018718244,0.00015397796,0.00052940956,0.026425136,0.0011465014,0.0014251964,0.0049316147,0.0009695828,0.000059985818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00630331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054179095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01014593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008897137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016096039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053657472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376286387","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2023.2210847","title":"The temporal dynamics of third-party moral judgment of harm transgressions: answers from a 2-response paradigm","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Accidental; Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Moral disengagement; Pace; Dynamics (music); Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.0728626972903084,"score_gpt":0.29809383383270466,"score_spread":0.22523113654239624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376286387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91215265,0.00016857691,0.06472259,0.0012640328,0.00018969923,0.00063549314,0.00044791953,0.00020892285,0.020210084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620235,0.000106623454,0.033565845,0.0009064549,0.00008202953,0.00093062915,0.00029295558,0.00015919638,0.0019328514],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962769,0.0020735853,0.00015755248,0.00069553184,0.000578065,0.00021832065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718032,0.021545393,0.0028014297,0.0019344671,0.00132561,0.00058982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063707326,0.00043587587,0.0006908051,0.00038643662,0.00049688446,0.0016300551,0.0009517237,0.0021129942,0.0075193015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05126117,0.0005644528,0.00046561725,0.00035097168,0.0010247432,0.002049524,0.0015591704,0.0023983663,0.0009431348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012321248,0.0029220507,0.034763422,0.0012055517,0.00022188666,0.0010145415,0.017298248,0.007520821,0.78053224,0.03597587,0.0030637959,0.1031603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024187802,0.007517416,0.38653073,0.00037325645,0.00033422612,0.0035345748,0.0075502917,0.26426718,0.102292314,0.20646375,0.017863544,0.0008539505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075191876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069229124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075193015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006789455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043809047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033692062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380997685","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2023.2220971","title":"Verbal and numeric probabilities differentially shape decisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Vagueness; Cognitive psychology; Nonverbal communication; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.11305609871285237,"score_gpt":0.3700312167534983,"score_spread":0.25697511804064593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380997685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858407,0.00010782773,0.0028260536,0.00019305648,0.000030028152,0.000029286039,0.00007207269,0.000032365657,0.010868617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975122,0.00006854433,0.0017298457,0.00007700314,0.000014088326,0.0000229809,0.00006171646,0.00002426281,0.00048938754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668807,0.0018192766,0.00018132635,0.0005302471,0.000588082,0.00019304575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96405,0.03018959,0.0030994934,0.0010923224,0.00091107213,0.00065744936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003303578,0.00035776498,0.00034399095,0.00047766117,0.00035145535,0.002831855,0.00034806528,0.0009800288,0.006359155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04682963,0.00032073187,0.00038265984,0.00032351882,0.0009512419,0.0018421429,0.0010040685,0.000977873,0.00059607736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020081833,0.001972979,0.40012088,0.0014465457,0.0006836828,0.0016672543,0.027613813,0.01890558,0.2557642,0.030927787,0.0044122706,0.23640324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009643816,0.0024566345,0.77274734,0.00039111657,0.0008205531,0.00084642024,0.008120743,0.04878816,0.043892436,0.110444635,0.010169527,0.0003580228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006923424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007800199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006359155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000464594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029486997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021273494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386967128","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2023.2259548","title":"Open-minded and reflective thinking predicts reasoning and meta-reasoning: evidence from a ratio-bias conflict task","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Critical thinking; Analytic reasoning; Task (project management); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Semantic reasoner; Verbal reasoning; Numeracy; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Reflection (computer programming); Social psychology; Confirmation bias; Debiasing; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Moral reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.2915215675014313,"score_gpt":0.4302327762172313,"score_spread":0.1387112087158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386967128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997895,0.000057898367,0.0010912641,0.000036476642,0.000003722424,0.000013388802,0.000060697632,0.000008864712,0.0008327186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975535,0.00005131376,0.0017917686,0.000039594346,0.0000065956415,0.000023387058,0.00019318998,0.0000133494195,0.00032742624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975452,0.0009807069,0.00029316597,0.00045284268,0.0006012404,0.00012690038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92700577,0.047036145,0.014768201,0.0072205355,0.0016345411,0.0023347028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007648526,0.00054238865,0.0004701949,0.0008864445,0.0002686749,0.0024042113,0.0006880839,0.00082994974,0.0025222818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04955568,0.00053519715,0.00054288335,0.00043770706,0.0007818301,0.0021018083,0.0016563311,0.0013146132,0.000490914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038120474,0.003408859,0.93705255,0.00016580301,0.00072166027,0.00021336967,0.0031262557,0.0023950604,0.016893916,0.0016367548,0.00042444837,0.030149164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015857746,0.0009943895,0.9669438,0.000043491385,0.00016337393,0.0005348387,0.00043278205,0.0143439695,0.008868483,0.0067497175,0.0006903284,0.00007610791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067731756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007672251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007648526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000204908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002505159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04044974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399783700","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2024.2368026","title":"Conspiracy beliefs in the context of a comprehensive rationality assessment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationality; Irrational number; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Probabilistic logic; Perception; Need for cognition; Cognition; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04292926179922172,"score_gpt":0.38479288631156155,"score_spread":0.3418636245123398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399783700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997943,0.00005052391,0.00038621484,0.00007830739,0.0000017593507,0.0000073622814,0.000009988393,0.0000023417474,0.0015204299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957925,0.00003092299,0.0002921308,0.000010454395,0.0000021154892,0.0000028192471,0.000012604036,5.557169e-7,0.00006914333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806947,0.00084331166,0.00012732613,0.00014226121,0.0006674345,0.00015016853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975868,0.012438986,0.006938217,0.0016350374,0.0018863861,0.0012334671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004564694,0.0002462629,0.0002608046,0.0015451919,0.00042211777,0.0015212412,0.00030943856,0.00033803663,0.0014453572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027426675,0.0001428072,0.00023606356,0.0008970808,0.0017154564,0.0012428825,0.0015805432,0.0011524837,0.000077931356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022576512,0.0002726077,0.92603135,0.000051420226,0.00012754332,0.00033932447,0.018688006,0.0014789549,0.0013429486,0.006374691,0.00023282797,0.044834524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015900441,0.00030044367,0.9644039,0.00009582557,0.000065763554,0.00031314936,0.011086989,0.0069278525,0.0009719473,0.014457237,0.0013238395,0.00003709179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004724296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012010156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004724296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072467385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010486386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024140656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405622067","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2024.2443149","title":"Jumping to fixations: jumping to conclusions is associated with less hypothesis generation and more fixation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jumping; Fixation (population genetics); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.15750505677185578,"score_gpt":0.3852931347231377,"score_spread":0.22778807795128192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405622067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98732346,0.00056679174,0.003243792,0.0011030559,0.00011465095,0.000059430116,0.00026769974,0.00012062136,0.007200539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934424,0.00022307219,0.0040624524,0.0007332204,0.00007894139,0.00006965344,0.00031468543,0.000060940125,0.0010145744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497074,0.0014492573,0.0005787669,0.0007274429,0.0019171493,0.0003565193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.857336,0.07955235,0.04870559,0.006018111,0.0046191947,0.003768772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075036,0.00042404298,0.0005020737,0.0013579697,0.00066647265,0.0012981682,0.00048053032,0.0013972118,0.0087381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08033481,0.00039087152,0.00066618435,0.00092574774,0.0011833356,0.0011012041,0.0012051448,0.0014762889,0.00059257547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040532574,0.0008355582,0.8534025,0.00071693334,0.0011148998,0.00059331517,0.0043963064,0.0006215717,0.033703387,0.002608898,0.0057439595,0.09220938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013526985,0.00059222337,0.98511595,0.00014377214,0.00023597782,0.00068280165,0.001248206,0.0012251098,0.002905093,0.0054044873,0.002228109,0.000082984494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020863872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032631988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0087381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065553014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000501181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039683282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411469388","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2025.2520186","title":"Actively open-minded thinking and liberal ideology: associations and dissociations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ideology; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019259498487210765,"score_gpt":0.3648475982979647,"score_spread":0.34558809981075395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411469388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99913317,0.000032188662,0.000096463315,0.000020377287,0.0000022588565,0.0000037447962,0.000022469314,0.0000019665642,0.00068735547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997111,0.00001757018,0.00007785823,0.000007923791,0.000004528769,0.0000042587526,0.00004403641,0.0000022674647,0.00013040466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986539,0.00036106116,0.00012156113,0.000259907,0.0004244762,0.00017899352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98644453,0.005991721,0.0045684315,0.0010119668,0.0006123498,0.0013710302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018060275,0.00024565178,0.00044145866,0.0017130873,0.00048602882,0.0013617144,0.00026652007,0.00040600917,0.0035253207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01163039,0.0003434799,0.00031209944,0.0009952438,0.001570709,0.00064944406,0.0015884428,0.0011984344,0.0002687164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002463073,0.0001670908,0.99055934,0.000016269214,0.000074280004,0.00012632308,0.0016803539,0.00008674833,0.0015494257,0.0005057137,0.000040735904,0.0049475413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108107615,0.00008373191,0.9970836,0.000007457145,0.000015191871,0.00040849007,0.0007659116,0.00029106092,0.00021647911,0.0010211208,0.000087283726,0.000008804093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010208222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014968094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035253207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002615614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003883472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011793375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411605300","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2025.2522485","title":"Systematic adaptive and maladaptive giving-up strategies in cognitive problem-solving","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0234525620049973,"score_gpt":0.3030130102216901,"score_spread":0.2795604482166928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411605300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984964,0.00015942143,0.00073246594,0.00003255516,0.0000018978129,0.000007807115,0.000008589432,0.000006683386,0.0005540489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905306,0.00007550378,0.00072498503,0.0000134816455,0.0000021061182,0.0000059827403,0.000020232943,0.0000029967885,0.000101630234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971405,0.001233093,0.00031502233,0.00035344815,0.0006889579,0.00026902408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98560184,0.005347094,0.005190037,0.002028421,0.00083294796,0.0009997111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041816663,0.0003861755,0.0003047353,0.0018224986,0.00043276203,0.0020065268,0.00045734816,0.0005441028,0.00076454406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021838216,0.0003972567,0.00037751984,0.00073934253,0.0017989059,0.0011485241,0.0014697263,0.0009165551,0.00015847731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013333287,0.00024534191,0.9470727,0.000064737906,0.00015823645,0.000104674524,0.006385568,0.00039408478,0.0021490583,0.0009998855,0.00006599863,0.04222629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012615499,0.00039286466,0.9856614,0.00006645888,0.00006818547,0.0008731963,0.0040174494,0.0017926326,0.0011384184,0.005363935,0.00057180255,0.000041161697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008274103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017396798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041816663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044429587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051438215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022115052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412721440","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2025.2536581","title":"Jumping to conclusions predicts truncated searches even in uncongenial contexts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Jumping; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.08133237262939795,"score_gpt":0.41803366666766867,"score_spread":0.3367012940382707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412721440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986645,0.00003437023,0.00015338261,0.00003410188,9.586984e-7,0.0000044359576,0.000019555871,0.000002937615,0.0010857004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992028,0.000044599994,0.000417289,0.000014965221,0.000002039065,0.000004762353,0.000085979314,0.000004912758,0.00022269839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992949,0.00015561772,0.00009901829,0.00014817246,0.00019897545,0.00010338829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820005,0.008888275,0.0058576856,0.0013983772,0.00051283196,0.0013422886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015862454,0.00022549523,0.00024879805,0.00094106304,0.00037560487,0.0021302649,0.00037966896,0.0008229147,0.004482376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020077731,0.00034289164,0.0003092454,0.0005604174,0.00075544347,0.0012724694,0.0011238904,0.0010617716,0.00043687754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006665618,0.0005712969,0.96781164,0.00010975885,0.00018491512,0.0003770044,0.0028704472,0.0008729363,0.007950675,0.001902146,0.00022461638,0.01645794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024120263,0.00024265675,0.98893285,0.00004145928,0.00007013305,0.00028680052,0.0011537204,0.0031709438,0.00085959263,0.004794324,0.00039797017,0.000025425106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012170665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002850312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004482376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023175975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027397598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014995098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}