{"meta":{"query_hash":"4e1aa4da46da","filters":{"venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":23,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":23,"exported":23,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4e1aa4da46da","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Thought+A+Journal+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1488671081","doi":"10.1002/tht3.81","title":"Intentionalism about Moods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02718441358315473,"score_gpt":0.30515280660116517,"score_spread":0.27796839301801046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488671081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086135976,0.001448731,0.0023648369,0.017249225,0.0023329498,0.00017158127,0.0000070558717,0.000033150947,0.8902565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500364,0.000017222077,0.00085848744,0.0014083917,0.0019398353,0.000008029756,7.9296683e-7,0.000014610955,0.00074899633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984225,0.00016536744,0.00053440535,0.00017084475,0.00040614398,0.00030074298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986988,0.00014440459,0.00033305617,0.00025446733,0.0002971547,0.00027211886],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005383056,0.0001488853,0.0002675409,0.00015910652,0.00009593121,0.000048659793,0.0005974513,0.00009697797,0.0078079407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102704,0.00010763113,0.00024898135,0.00032204064,0.00041351528,0.000385638,0.000061151855,0.00039025518,0.0016266676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051941606,0.00018730512,0.00011798007,0.000004983699,0.00006646191,0.000040759016,0.00034142117,0.0000014111598,0.0008191101,0.9926411,0.0027464414,0.002981076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057773234,0.00025919732,0.0055806437,0.0000576564,0.000027188062,0.0003096294,0.000046342153,0.000012503294,0.00021430064,0.98875105,0.0040297764,0.00013396973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007989422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.1999668e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90886766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028706996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027507607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501685897","doi":"10.1002/tht3.113","title":"Phenomenal Blending and the Palette Problem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Creatures; Epistemology; Palette (painting); Simple (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.022459131425452403,"score_gpt":0.23220790060789256,"score_spread":0.20974876918244018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501685897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0916617,0.0060032634,0.00022637438,0.0624089,0.00251735,0.00034016123,0.0000109729035,0.00002574895,0.8368055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987576,0.00010040889,0.00035751885,0.0035496897,0.0077363076,0.0000024516976,6.232735e-7,0.00001165425,0.00066535705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990901,0.00013215201,0.0003563915,0.00006950565,0.00019094121,0.00016093544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993393,0.00012265117,0.00029930368,0.000088459994,0.00004886946,0.00010142994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008527082,0.00009731446,0.00020849789,0.000066313405,0.00035579046,0.00008331795,0.00014482989,0.000017396653,0.0003165312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009174588,0.000052660096,0.000081793325,0.000022989305,0.00025047665,0.00015031549,0.000021788745,0.0002326859,0.000018628985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002535632,0.000026497957,0.00009301833,0.00008967522,0.000029930134,0.00000167597,0.006807627,8.2221743e-7,0.000008004868,0.9874026,0.0024548324,0.002831715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024222082,0.0003040417,0.000042877105,0.00015908579,0.00005183605,0.00006847195,0.0004537998,0.000049285485,0.000011077036,0.62257195,0.3737588,0.00010659386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005664382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008458681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8959143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010049147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018267507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34657946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581406839","doi":"10.1002/tht3.7","title":"Knowledge Norms and Acting Well","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.09713036496291498,"score_gpt":0.30029271442886024,"score_spread":0.20316234946594525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581406839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19751298,0.014795373,0.00011465041,0.0026590535,0.004537165,0.00010340175,0.0000075744642,0.000031700187,0.7802381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842541,0.0001623615,0.0002948832,0.00034451936,0.012510554,7.433093e-7,7.5155134e-7,0.000020092008,0.0024119571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991132,0.00009507408,0.00034290343,0.00007306536,0.00013915353,0.00023661816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990217,0.00018444355,0.00033903075,0.00010828947,0.00019623514,0.00015030801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076123996,0.00013329356,0.00029252772,0.00011133829,0.0002250483,0.00005590266,0.00013426537,0.000058533846,0.00021420667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053218504,0.00009676918,0.00013292836,0.000031027135,0.0003015871,0.0005978243,0.000043652795,0.0004339025,0.00008370273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046634148,0.00021836386,0.0008176014,0.00013043861,0.0001269248,0.0000073465253,0.05406923,3.5282036e-7,0.00023200786,0.93825704,0.0019497359,0.004144313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062903407,0.00021989182,0.00022947813,0.00013791755,0.00014993461,0.00010345025,0.0017159119,0.000005535137,0.0005994781,0.15153153,0.8444469,0.00023093064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000040482055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010374212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84249717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018024342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030694886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39461327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605641722","doi":"10.1002/tht3.71","title":"The Epistemology of Prejudice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Introspection; Culpability; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Criminology","score_opus":0.032070464176204586,"score_gpt":0.30618113263398367,"score_spread":0.2741106684577791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605641722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10669883,0.017283045,0.00023345437,0.15383445,0.002876754,0.00043537279,0.0000035179328,0.00002464659,0.7186099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962843,0.00066355366,0.0003048032,0.0002444923,0.00077782024,0.0000040502687,8.2113914e-8,0.0000052755436,0.0017156384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851257,0.0004569017,0.00045751754,0.000072822906,0.00028103386,0.00021918718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807805,0.00075183116,0.00054821075,0.00014093063,0.0004070062,0.000073997406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013239892,0.00007824498,0.0002603257,0.000052741896,0.0005575935,0.000017906017,0.00046448232,0.00008408081,0.00008343265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044864815,0.00004920957,0.00013916091,0.00017923242,0.0011324392,0.00014196223,0.000050596027,0.00020076892,0.000041651987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012938166,0.0001365396,0.007608858,0.00004032952,0.0003866595,0.000026707086,0.020488027,0.0000034316056,0.00023435973,0.9341642,0.030131703,0.0066498043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004901679,0.00041347393,0.0099423975,0.000060988918,0.000070469614,0.00007434505,0.005075487,0.0000024110336,0.0002818328,0.87316275,0.11029052,0.00013514352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008968586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046635996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88958544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026341624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013770576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42886144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1799915287","doi":"10.1002/tht3.100","title":"Basic Knowledge and Contextualist “E = K”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Identification (biology); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.06956186225621573,"score_gpt":0.27674724919219484,"score_spread":0.2071853869359791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1799915287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2319887,0.02218191,0.00011288411,0.0149041265,0.0033180872,0.0003209267,0.00002105007,0.00005024641,0.7271021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98894423,0.00020287745,0.0001540473,0.0009414942,0.0047677234,0.0000032414544,0.0000013801556,0.00002056819,0.004964407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904186,0.00012736591,0.00041309273,0.00010590536,0.0001425565,0.00016925237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987412,0.00019423227,0.0003060463,0.00013546672,0.000494516,0.00012850515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038182037,0.0001453022,0.00035165437,0.00011457376,0.00018882388,0.00011785399,0.00017586502,0.000056126217,0.00063242106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060452596,0.00010740743,0.0001417795,0.000029372268,0.00060207583,0.00042291242,0.00003857437,0.00035821303,0.00017075829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022220212,0.00012326318,0.000093982584,0.000091573296,0.00010606722,0.00001119624,0.02231196,1.614914e-7,0.00022255443,0.9552563,0.017607221,0.004153534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008040806,0.00034078828,0.0002092424,0.00014251156,0.00008859865,0.00007401422,0.0014380799,0.0000120848035,0.00014729041,0.59463906,0.40190652,0.00019770786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027065726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003398705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75695556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015369022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046337478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1861935076","doi":"10.1002/tht3.163","title":"Sensitivity, Causality, and Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Université de Montréal; University of Glasgow; European Commission","keywords":"Causation; Impossibility; Sensitivity (control systems); Causality (physics); Rest (music); Counterexample; Statistical evidence; Epistemology; Modal; Econometrics; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2065072938505597,"score_gpt":0.42507689479463623,"score_spread":0.21856960094407654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1861935076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9014356,0.006666383,0.0067947167,0.027391873,0.0010839368,0.00034639385,0.00003569358,0.000032463384,0.056212917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955629,0.00014758753,0.0037080126,0.0001830653,0.00036598937,3.114731e-7,1.2098043e-7,0.000006910255,0.00002511486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977532,0.0006092034,0.00046106376,0.00011272138,0.00089605333,0.00016775576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974045,0.0013907691,0.0003417589,0.00009894972,0.00055021205,0.0002137693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004712527,0.00008338637,0.00032444965,0.00012962683,0.000059456805,0.000046743666,0.00016858142,0.00006686665,0.00001611929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030163876,0.000072145194,0.00003353251,0.0002262886,0.0005542835,0.00052219623,0.000080902195,0.000209108,0.000004366853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026241166,0.00014860378,0.006205111,0.000057708323,0.000018919687,0.0004421243,0.0073593725,0.000040515682,0.0001812942,0.98090434,0.0009304633,0.00344916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055554224,0.00025702998,0.0053314846,0.0005964676,0.000035051566,0.00010649402,0.00045279268,0.000023091787,0.00021493869,0.987391,0.0048990636,0.00013707245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030798983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005528499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09412727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064778964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039324883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36111155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131318859","doi":"10.1002/tht3.149","title":"Well-Being, Self-Regarding Reasons, and Morality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Morality; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.022198487836265938,"score_gpt":0.3191771512198415,"score_spread":0.2969786633835756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131318859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6666574,0.009076322,0.00045651416,0.09702388,0.0011133596,0.0003184377,0.000003241719,0.00009719908,0.22525366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862881,0.001185777,0.0055206236,0.002023797,0.0047828956,8.5750355e-7,0.0000012520088,0.000024054965,0.00017267918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841154,0.00020467618,0.00052587845,0.00016198504,0.00047183456,0.00022410245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844897,0.00022418026,0.00033195628,0.00024464497,0.00035829184,0.00039193232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019871844,0.0001516396,0.0004896758,0.00015802046,0.00011166187,0.000029956356,0.00011896067,0.00016630776,0.00003518398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004970254,0.0001156928,0.00014225834,0.00018319848,0.00007344956,0.00014760431,0.000039306717,0.0009235418,0.000012351666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009720084,0.0006553823,0.17433162,0.0031206205,0.0006480495,0.0007991367,0.00686306,0.000009131564,0.00044626513,0.7853388,0.011241829,0.015574095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059585725,0.0028559584,0.01522667,0.0015973363,0.0010670653,0.003151091,0.00019746288,0.0005592921,0.0008359751,0.30434617,0.66361135,0.0005930762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016753142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.515503e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6523695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005537332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011863411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47178155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493854963","doi":"10.1002/tht3.210","title":"Essence Facts and Explanation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030884694775852716,"score_gpt":0.3020228605549769,"score_spread":0.2711381657791242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493854963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45329922,0.0015728156,0.024739888,0.058285,0.0020715909,0.00017430098,0.0000202833,0.000045678164,0.4597912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854505,0.000046893805,0.00023723624,0.0003344201,0.0006947804,7.6519524e-7,1.01706476e-7,0.000006701143,0.00013406998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906105,0.00010586836,0.00027537838,0.00013958897,0.00024127854,0.00017682083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991242,0.00025717527,0.00022034215,0.00013970643,0.00008895239,0.00016959928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047709016,0.00009375728,0.00016119819,0.000105104264,0.00006511434,0.000015093685,0.00023117704,0.000057609745,0.00041416058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001399521,0.000052276326,0.000054905297,0.00014737829,0.0002751039,0.0003072114,0.00003192256,0.00011145735,0.00009888901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011453525,0.000051387295,0.00027357865,0.0000031204042,0.000019337293,0.000056096076,0.00033073474,1.0595638e-7,0.0056655547,0.9830111,0.00016646509,0.010307948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006510817,0.0002616474,0.0041985274,0.000081415594,0.000015195854,0.0002755516,0.000025419477,0.0000012427089,0.0012547493,0.9914349,0.001706693,0.000093611125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.541717e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.789576e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54524577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017866352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016683154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4534768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524483968","doi":"10.1002/tht3.213","title":"Actionability Judgments Cause Knowledge Judgments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12007274588769724,"score_gpt":0.313337800412243,"score_spread":0.1932650545245458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524483968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48623893,0.003539284,0.0008501333,0.028314,0.017802982,0.0005949676,0.00019133903,0.00014434599,0.46232402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98476887,0.00015442526,0.0001383864,0.0004344324,0.0057545872,0.0000043184727,0.0000014206087,0.000027432352,0.008716128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832726,0.00027782607,0.0006176656,0.00018427873,0.00033219936,0.00026076485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981354,0.00031720838,0.0005148573,0.0002838188,0.00058820966,0.00016053708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088748644,0.00020202501,0.00039496753,0.00015440375,0.00029570682,0.000050924336,0.00031734485,0.00008587436,0.0007739984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016588267,0.00012486996,0.00029364382,0.000046973386,0.00053360575,0.00060059753,0.000060589402,0.0003869639,0.0002624675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003962096,0.0014805306,0.0018123209,0.00019841956,0.00087594485,0.000055000393,0.01970852,0.0000010526315,0.0028954863,0.93970793,0.019791007,0.013077556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017951943,0.0004468639,0.0005553655,0.00028617028,0.00019898951,0.00004134941,0.00030330135,0.0000012544934,0.001791736,0.54103935,0.4532462,0.00029422314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006219573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034086388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49852994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012706459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012600565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8474739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792277594","doi":"10.1002/tht3.267","title":"The Cut-Free Approach and the Admissibility-Curry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Metatheory; Criticism; Intuitionistic logic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Law; Linear logic","score_opus":0.03584329057771598,"score_gpt":0.24377705222429283,"score_spread":0.20793376164657684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792277594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014587528,0.008039199,0.00016777872,0.095877536,0.0022069924,0.00043593274,0.000031064745,0.00004886335,0.8786051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97827667,0.00018686707,0.00015417843,0.0013597469,0.018100496,0.0000061814667,7.3898804e-7,0.000025282401,0.0018898597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981481,0.00031407972,0.0006223425,0.00018546844,0.000455954,0.00027406303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976972,0.0006898922,0.0004512578,0.00062443403,0.00037553842,0.00016169815],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001563821,0.00021723464,0.0003779919,0.00006667483,0.0013558576,0.00034614684,0.0009470594,0.000055668184,0.00015307519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004810737,0.00009483435,0.00028823805,0.00009233415,0.004028418,0.00033020115,0.00022878395,0.00056358555,0.000028105485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007699712,0.00009516798,0.000007624543,0.000018843291,0.00012045064,0.000004926134,0.005564207,2.3725207e-7,0.0000059194313,0.9824143,0.009152607,0.0018457535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015027241,0.00021434356,0.000019741115,0.000033410786,0.00008447116,0.00006021624,0.00035110698,0.000062375686,0.000034776454,0.7080504,0.289481,0.00010545392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006072324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025326997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96368915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022640279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005932844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792378140","doi":"10.1002/tht3.263","title":"Against Existential Grounding","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Ground; Philosophy; Physics; Linguistics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.0437556829156535,"score_gpt":0.3320311971522997,"score_spread":0.28827551423664616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792378140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13616428,0.00035345647,0.0027780342,0.0024756247,0.003913474,0.000068708214,0.000004073513,0.000026940726,0.85421544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98850787,0.000009744144,0.00074708083,0.0010174843,0.00937871,0.0000013579387,5.0718046e-7,0.000017186627,0.00032007956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983379,0.00018391693,0.00050388917,0.00020184238,0.00041299543,0.000359435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987846,0.00011208332,0.0003645413,0.00027816987,0.00021092563,0.000249669],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087652105,0.00015507783,0.0002779162,0.00018065466,0.0001832331,0.0000446285,0.0006214931,0.00009634595,0.0013445363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101255995,0.00011878171,0.00022079682,0.00041821075,0.00073838845,0.00027549834,0.00007123881,0.00033101992,0.0006133071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029487358,0.00015554523,0.00007255856,0.0000045603333,0.00006840195,0.00014756486,0.0007650923,2.511891e-7,0.0019833716,0.99047303,0.0008280683,0.005206664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094629335,0.00089147635,0.00082572055,0.00008458575,0.00004720372,0.00036370836,0.000073632924,0.000010897875,0.0009941077,0.9825669,0.01299891,0.00019654809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013811313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.0540332e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85389537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041319086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003374319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901886758","doi":"10.1002/tht3.394","title":"The Hierarchy of Fregean Senses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.02879752274494847,"score_gpt":0.3203073444967785,"score_spread":0.29150982175183004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901886758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17464377,0.0021851743,0.0010515796,0.015936712,0.0027728325,0.00013444218,0.000013574031,0.000020380674,0.80324155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958146,0.00003510529,0.00038952587,0.0003812458,0.0031146163,9.857487e-7,1.4360616e-7,0.000011696607,0.00025208003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835277,0.00027912427,0.0005383723,0.00013616872,0.00040611764,0.00028744983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815273,0.0005285964,0.00046873928,0.00037672606,0.0003167572,0.00015647353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011518039,0.0001245346,0.00025733843,0.00009836575,0.00021138646,0.000021215414,0.000734951,0.00006937116,0.00039136043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022081721,0.000070602866,0.00019387614,0.0003933743,0.001902993,0.00012014752,0.00007033251,0.00028991915,0.00012877323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038517444,0.00010708205,0.00008969116,0.0000038379367,0.00006907946,0.000033759166,0.0009868101,2.6818236e-7,0.0013587453,0.9900665,0.0010032657,0.005895785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044638026,0.00097096595,0.00088207464,0.000054772103,0.000033355882,0.00022070276,0.000077637764,0.0000055231085,0.0040225475,0.980982,0.0122133875,0.00009067303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000027490735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.237347e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8211708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016715881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042895394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7011657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901933380","doi":"10.1002/tht3.398","title":"Metaphysical Vagueness Without Vague Objects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme","keywords":"Vagueness; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Abstraction; Legitimacy; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.03392288595889619,"score_gpt":0.3308243290956619,"score_spread":0.2969014431367657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901933380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24731688,0.00068169803,0.00421194,0.0038804857,0.00378401,0.00018124872,0.000010985754,0.00006311087,0.73986965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99016744,0.0000068259787,0.00096096075,0.00095766125,0.007667421,0.0000040792506,5.787752e-7,0.000028043289,0.00020696617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976698,0.00034311827,0.0005919448,0.00031747905,0.0005982371,0.00047939754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815285,0.00020477966,0.00043871594,0.00045916092,0.0003665852,0.0003778891],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009234191,0.00025151344,0.0005273316,0.00020651198,0.00017794038,0.00004299589,0.0008597473,0.00013634407,0.0009788416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014208496,0.00018194818,0.00031732154,0.0006727891,0.0010978511,0.0003397085,0.00009415607,0.00048093076,0.00082765025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005301441,0.00039005151,0.00027300784,0.000008240857,0.00016605688,0.00013009096,0.0013263429,0.0000010751544,0.003327436,0.9913486,0.00044103077,0.0020578702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011542732,0.0012931152,0.0019705018,0.000081388396,0.00013102056,0.00043620527,0.00006781789,0.000023008351,0.00660496,0.9854159,0.0025397271,0.00028212674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000047211342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010912438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7428506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003676094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007062807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947228016","doi":"10.1002/tht3.419","title":"Constitutive and Consequentialist Essence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Assimilation (phonology); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019159426496319264,"score_gpt":0.2964437146430562,"score_spread":0.27728428814673695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947228016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24301964,0.0011735264,0.0011391357,0.0047058985,0.001758188,0.0001491995,0.00001424072,0.000016049255,0.7480241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832714,0.000021328218,0.00024469325,0.0007235946,0.00045892518,0.0000010807995,3.286893e-7,0.000007171548,0.00021573635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988999,0.000119084485,0.00033656217,0.00018542707,0.00024543575,0.00021361004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899846,0.0002310674,0.00027091693,0.00019388384,0.00012243597,0.00018320882],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005199143,0.00012463501,0.00027816987,0.0000994045,0.00007407911,0.00003059931,0.00028939743,0.00007278514,0.0010963801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007443961,0.00009487816,0.00008957161,0.00020471899,0.0009669983,0.00021788542,0.000055174063,0.00028565843,0.0002824735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019943481,0.000069372705,0.00078281877,0.000009667737,0.0000499768,0.00014352646,0.0003498078,0.0000011079258,0.00312058,0.9947629,0.00012295123,0.0003878546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094882457,0.00037133825,0.0011268059,0.00008941895,0.0000379159,0.0009882939,0.000085283646,0.0000059207705,0.0006712399,0.9924117,0.0031175243,0.00014578177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000042130055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.0736042e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7553075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018328237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056762387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953614120","doi":"10.1002/tht3.417","title":"Knowledge from Falsehood","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Premise; Verdict; Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07153808595598073,"score_gpt":0.27900952413600877,"score_spread":0.20747143818002806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953614120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039147,0.0070807245,0.00007614058,0.0034352266,0.006867273,0.00015490467,0.000058047972,0.000038918755,0.67837405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98385036,0.00008431182,0.00027623549,0.0005942377,0.009178886,9.450366e-7,0.000004640394,0.000028135024,0.0059822495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883515,0.00013595093,0.00047601078,0.00013730614,0.00022744262,0.00018817149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986564,0.00023478098,0.0004154481,0.00024211698,0.0003515797,0.00009970242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039904378,0.00016448266,0.00044709854,0.00012567635,0.00010839169,0.00007184177,0.00033881984,0.00007942864,0.0014335484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037345242,0.0001263013,0.0002979985,0.000039803246,0.00020741786,0.0003366285,0.00004595996,0.000502163,0.0009110036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008810898,0.00025999077,0.00037614125,0.00006149121,0.00026319272,0.000021422398,0.027599767,0.0000028055651,0.000711262,0.9640687,0.004719707,0.0018273996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008423663,0.00030711404,0.00013079494,0.00014478629,0.00010300124,0.000012622068,0.00074062747,0.000009122663,0.00044489186,0.58492565,0.41215253,0.00018651223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017679811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034527788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67993563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026006544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008919927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093794830","doi":"10.1002/tht3.470","title":"Desolation sound: Social practices of natural beauty","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Beauty; Natural (archaeology); Sound (geography); Aesthetics; Value (mathematics); Counterexample; Art; Computer science; Mathematics; History; Acoustics; Physics","score_opus":0.0582772348523895,"score_gpt":0.3096350281006884,"score_spread":0.2513577932482989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093794830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96185833,0.0005402291,0.0008108343,0.030472025,0.00019803831,0.000107467145,0.0000037127995,0.000011457786,0.005997919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951776,0.000025755597,0.0025158979,0.0010484254,0.001193905,3.2252143e-7,8.525491e-7,0.000009192145,0.000028015513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888706,0.0000817321,0.0003515717,0.00009817282,0.000434332,0.00014710183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984342,0.000053813423,0.0013058275,0.00005859916,0.00002992634,0.000117659096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003297531,0.00008732222,0.00021336859,0.000030012327,0.000094269984,0.000013737258,0.00020949167,0.000050866314,0.00035842552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010038707,0.000071251074,0.00011275249,0.00022601691,0.00010075799,0.00056185154,0.000058980266,0.00031301638,0.00006050751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020351796,0.0005159395,0.8623432,0.00021859119,0.00022407065,0.00010971604,0.023065872,0.00021333035,0.061905693,0.008418288,0.0333219,0.0076282397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008672014,0.005383719,0.6814138,0.0002363907,0.00092026015,0.00048115698,0.0018493485,0.0051505435,0.006650191,0.22443396,0.063164495,0.001644104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030933705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002643092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21601567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065025204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003220904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3924508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131993214","doi":"10.1002/tht3.473","title":"Surprise, surprise: KK is innocent","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Surprise; Analogy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Blame; Counterintuitive; Wright; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; History; Social psychology; Art history","score_opus":0.08003400529711314,"score_gpt":0.2827868260427748,"score_spread":0.20275282074566164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131993214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124980345,0.02629088,0.00044626548,0.0543404,0.011749681,0.0002627379,0.00016880999,0.00009952556,0.78166133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96969754,0.0010160416,0.0007080946,0.0055589746,0.010360837,0.0000021767648,0.000010031257,0.00005431532,0.012591979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980632,0.00023098435,0.0007308453,0.00019914295,0.0004824986,0.0002933328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975014,0.00018773584,0.00055311836,0.00032960475,0.001265402,0.00016274399],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000673143,0.0002218122,0.0005555402,0.00014801373,0.00025304497,0.00013964725,0.00031396374,0.00010490976,0.0015884056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000130766,0.00018573915,0.0004255407,0.00011777472,0.0003774916,0.00035647536,0.00005984399,0.000692786,0.00012437871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012160559,0.000513439,0.00043759024,0.00019575514,0.0005035948,0.00061461737,0.03443319,0.000004544615,0.0005427759,0.9099844,0.04908179,0.0035666917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007428456,0.00016971031,0.00008747213,0.00014811616,0.00015144021,0.00011807649,0.001006415,0.0000033551535,0.0029324535,0.32057604,0.6738146,0.0002494572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010590219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031551353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8447172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004651867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027725528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175943036","doi":"10.1002/tht3.500","title":"Seeing and attending wholes and parts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Counterexample; Pace; Virtue; Psychology; Crowding; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.0315117463361862,"score_gpt":0.3053472851435999,"score_spread":0.2738355388074137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175943036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7516336,0.01605287,0.0006057243,0.020559099,0.0010019472,0.00006865109,0.000007806166,0.000021189237,0.21004914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756753,0.00012742887,0.0006057589,0.00074563315,0.0008396867,7.6066124e-7,3.2079677e-7,0.000009474179,0.00010339255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897254,0.00015428373,0.0002860355,0.00018744842,0.00019091356,0.00020880831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922395,0.00019602446,0.00016014869,0.00013346157,0.000080866295,0.00020555849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004886147,0.00011112719,0.000239574,0.00007655329,0.0001202004,0.000051941515,0.00012100686,0.00006232606,0.00018395629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001022166,0.00008886893,0.00006274208,0.00019192371,0.00029997126,0.00019924814,0.00008453949,0.00025902037,0.000013098241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005601306,0.00006194384,0.0017761679,0.000015619617,0.000051416766,0.0006383706,0.0008482196,8.394088e-7,0.0026816379,0.98890984,0.000117345255,0.004842607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006847303,0.0001684597,0.009132815,0.00015794308,0.000057139954,0.0025699576,0.00017973552,0.000013036496,0.00094107975,0.9812305,0.004708937,0.00015565714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.891082e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.1106143e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24593396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010155668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000204275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.362397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216365467","doi":"10.1002/tht3.505","title":"On performatives being statements too","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Performative utterance; Statement (logic); Falsity; Utterance; Epistemology; Speech act; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Linguistics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03629788040243592,"score_gpt":0.3620852785516364,"score_spread":0.3257873981492005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216365467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25267255,0.0004119006,0.0013750114,0.0052112937,0.001274426,0.00005827801,0.000009057593,0.000015198942,0.73897225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965929,0.00002750334,0.0005428254,0.0017338921,0.00069341395,0.0000011389596,0.0000012469645,0.00001162589,0.00039545028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836534,0.00026307607,0.0004772465,0.00016921744,0.00044672468,0.00027836795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989118,0.0002293825,0.00027763846,0.0002376216,0.00015641421,0.00018712835],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006004676,0.0001420202,0.00025968498,0.0001122138,0.00012683649,0.00003789932,0.00033090502,0.000059021717,0.0017251231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015021238,0.00010773115,0.00016490088,0.00033077106,0.00016078324,0.00038094932,0.00005890488,0.0003945398,0.00028875892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020340296,0.00030523326,0.00005627657,0.000009116391,0.00008767141,0.00037092023,0.0022956564,0.000009251481,0.00042543994,0.9921339,0.0005100339,0.0035931065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008216877,0.0005269803,0.0004495762,0.00010265853,0.000028226972,0.0002031016,0.00021452991,0.000011723844,0.002450638,0.99230886,0.002749406,0.00013264529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.4964253e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.174368e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7439203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040055747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005019729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229698470","doi":"10.1002/tht.27","title":"Aha! Trick Questions, Independence, and the Epistemology of Disagreement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Independence (probability theory); sort; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.039163960784125124,"score_gpt":0.2591638248835249,"score_spread":0.21999986409939978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229698470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5240138,0.036829617,0.0010825819,0.11042559,0.006201537,0.001719079,0.00006203084,0.000055381002,0.31961036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954751,0.00047221457,0.0002606961,0.0006489342,0.0015426679,0.000007909462,9.22066e-7,0.000011320961,0.0015802298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984192,0.00037627984,0.00065127277,0.000101925616,0.00029742208,0.00015386398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980547,0.00047663247,0.00070002483,0.00019305112,0.00050579984,0.000069827154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011023887,0.00013509374,0.00046548827,0.00012537594,0.0001836552,0.00005121206,0.0002682322,0.00007444691,0.00028737998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013988612,0.000077051554,0.00017827435,0.000047376507,0.0015692071,0.00027387,0.000057913297,0.00043786378,0.000023017286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008916036,0.00009439513,0.00032532657,0.00006496846,0.00014261715,0.0000054601906,0.00777534,0.0000019786987,0.000035464775,0.9884315,0.0014241713,0.0016096045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001692535,0.00034273078,0.0005741213,0.00010756566,0.00016291735,0.000088663226,0.0011059127,0.000021680524,0.00007547423,0.9739166,0.021794079,0.000117723546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012650648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041782507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4714613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015700502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005976801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5781809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295993527","doi":"10.5840/tht2022912","title":"A Higher-Order Approach to Diachronic Continence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Normative; Order (exchange); Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07426243732536746,"score_gpt":0.2699445828771557,"score_spread":0.19568214555178826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295993527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045947473,0.0071771145,0.00150508,0.030584529,0.008394152,0.0005718722,0.000113231334,0.000094594136,0.90561193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98211056,0.00002682533,0.0012352037,0.0032841603,0.0054397904,0.000021451238,0.000004963312,0.000033868477,0.007843192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983849,0.00024620845,0.0004682649,0.00017331811,0.00046757038,0.00025975987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883825,0.000109091336,0.00038134353,0.000229282,0.00031295573,0.00012910074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007637348,0.00016646896,0.00040162646,0.00017129381,0.0004661764,0.0000651412,0.0004870023,0.00003137574,0.0007995224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004110256,0.00014104828,0.00022170148,0.00013100279,0.00024965467,0.00020122787,0.00014458176,0.00071941223,0.00003661312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100282195,0.00036599408,0.000026155796,0.000047317008,0.000114761664,0.000022450748,0.015733242,0.00017142066,0.00013553508,0.97217196,0.010609918,0.00050096074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007068392,0.000615673,0.000044411125,0.00002532513,0.00008711784,0.00005628938,0.0010315923,0.000023065697,0.000036262707,0.1659725,0.8311731,0.00022782593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016574853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047985027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93616307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074032214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012995927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.875421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323904039","doi":"10.5840/tht20233815","title":"Reconciling the Epistemic and the Zetetic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06218353819122607,"score_gpt":0.2499699023227975,"score_spread":0.18778636413157143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323904039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30282065,0.05670317,0.00013691667,0.3492541,0.010127428,0.00081543595,0.000070419745,0.000058719892,0.28001317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919024,0.00023624544,0.000036893853,0.0028547368,0.002967798,0.000008025419,6.860592e-7,0.000015180818,0.0019780027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984408,0.0006155155,0.0004127641,0.00009058574,0.00029666617,0.00014368421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983939,0.0007845083,0.00045128143,0.00019458789,0.00013705606,0.00003865363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024775274,0.00010881234,0.0002773854,0.000054943055,0.0011146674,0.000081307,0.00038458817,0.000019512368,0.0002437734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009848212,0.00005516051,0.00020090876,0.000043437383,0.0010464175,0.00011053138,0.00011055947,0.00083888636,0.0000061717037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015521291,0.000024482626,0.000017547096,0.00002367925,0.00010011614,0.000013395553,0.037299868,0.000024416391,0.000028925033,0.9600677,0.0011990864,0.0010456102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097582594,0.00016254163,0.000010462131,0.000027465712,0.00013198196,0.00027525466,0.004851145,0.00005203703,0.000017412976,0.76817286,0.22523502,0.00008801257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001647904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014972671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6890818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028406486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065091095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85732335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402783746","doi":"10.5840/tht202492035","title":"Recruitment Revisited","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.3600932633523501,"score_gpt":0.4962339274580881,"score_spread":0.136140664105738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402783746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38178462,0.020787489,0.00037349542,0.29322714,0.012421049,0.0043505915,0.000100588004,0.0006685322,0.2862865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98254955,0.0029923732,0.00030098157,0.0017297046,0.009212191,0.000050414612,0.0000061614555,0.00004858247,0.0031100563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970818,0.0008460242,0.0010814526,0.00013170076,0.00044068095,0.00041831724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979556,0.00036029617,0.00072162633,0.00026310855,0.00043768573,0.00026167306],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025692163,0.00013503722,0.00046494263,0.00031672456,0.00033638414,0.000005395943,0.00023205031,0.00019408522,0.00028856465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020188914,0.000097718774,0.00015906956,0.00055690313,0.00002401869,0.00012042517,0.0000701832,0.00089322566,0.0011682633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007327196,0.00030784015,0.012982336,0.0055442736,0.0006307706,0.0013788476,0.034479596,0.000018066234,0.0023725808,0.28392908,0.5965261,0.06109777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014004573,0.00046746724,0.006014807,0.0026580917,0.000036418376,0.000045232686,0.0028935857,0.000020984571,0.000032273234,0.04602849,0.9402059,0.00019629282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009319669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000044511867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60076493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001344348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027620365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}