{"meta":{"query_hash":"4e1aa4da46da","filters":{"venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":23,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":23,"exported":23,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4e1aa4da46da","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Thought+A+Journal+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1488671081","doi":"10.1002/tht3.81","title":"Intentionalism about Moods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02718441358315473,"score_gpt":0.30515280660116517,"score_spread":0.27796839301801046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488671081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06679181,0.002577402,0.40037856,0.014025251,0.0008688982,0.000114264454,0.00025950713,0.00035618278,0.51462823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408472,0.0008203906,0.038459636,0.0016583435,0.0005013185,0.00020942635,0.0001604809,0.00014303363,0.01720011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980247,0.00083367835,0.00011758581,0.00041749323,0.0003539583,0.00025267812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987386,0.0004710547,0.00012570103,0.0003183676,0.00021499139,0.00013124563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020699291,0.00048432432,0.000404786,0.0010129759,0.0026044361,0.004695637,0.00076591497,0.001536422,0.004006589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003073163,0.00037330898,0.0012207162,0.00045212163,0.014384674,0.007419848,0.0038275768,0.0032023296,0.0006241772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003199726,0.0000021335393,0.000046191042,0.000010087314,0.0000028166507,0.0000127713365,0.00061541353,0.00007396924,0.00016795493,0.99766964,0.00027957285,0.0011163723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054126044,0.000005906512,0.00008724511,0.000009804813,0.000003940909,0.00002400289,0.00015111509,0.0004325187,0.00012264473,0.99204236,0.0071106283,0.0000044506523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012819269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094375183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004695637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019304208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008897285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014006197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501685897","doi":"10.1002/tht3.113","title":"Phenomenal Blending and the Palette Problem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Creatures; Epistemology; Palette (painting); Simple (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.022459131425452403,"score_gpt":0.23220790060789256,"score_spread":0.20974876918244018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501685897","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11477831,0.007614735,0.3849459,0.11084912,0.0017254534,0.00015564071,0.00015721336,0.0005702681,0.37920335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96308255,0.0013949239,0.022502499,0.0043786243,0.00045786868,0.00016322728,0.00005139977,0.00012759704,0.007841271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750656,0.0009623287,0.00011402314,0.0005156373,0.0005687402,0.00033265312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971938,0.0015672804,0.00029909835,0.0005632502,0.00018843451,0.00018815366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004819938,0.000573985,0.0007502954,0.0019396832,0.004256268,0.006300232,0.0019250097,0.0032584483,0.007809786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007264428,0.0005136409,0.0010675361,0.0012477391,0.04659242,0.022950644,0.009788807,0.009055837,0.00070953683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011212322,0.0000067977116,0.00017608087,0.000023127179,0.0000035537846,0.00005709562,0.0035776105,0.00007610306,0.00014899774,0.9930561,0.00048287172,0.0023804903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063609905,0.00001046071,0.00015795676,0.0000284038,0.0000031259094,0.00016094996,0.0016291825,0.00038666336,0.00016245116,0.9863458,0.011102248,0.0000063783878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076426537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005109434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007809786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022545445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009876244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026126325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581406839","doi":"10.1002/tht3.7","title":"Knowledge Norms and Acting Well","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.09713036496291498,"score_gpt":0.30029271442886024,"score_spread":0.20316234946594525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581406839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030983735,0.0031535362,0.108949214,0.07299086,0.0010531972,0.00009205162,0.00011370739,0.00018043177,0.7824833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530763,0.001071018,0.018106434,0.006382442,0.00054146163,0.00017360324,0.000078928126,0.00008828865,0.020481404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98126686,0.010814655,0.00091299706,0.0025036014,0.0031223113,0.0013795642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97497195,0.01304504,0.0023329959,0.0041400827,0.0038577947,0.0016521509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017974844,0.0005904934,0.0007461812,0.001494643,0.005009376,0.008587844,0.001405023,0.0054453737,0.007592338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024499258,0.0003166219,0.00082504563,0.00084253954,0.04184049,0.014990466,0.005831235,0.0047220835,0.0014504484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035964176,0.000004139846,0.00008640405,0.000009294556,0.0000031828088,0.000014272169,0.0007798555,0.000117936455,0.000022607614,0.9971106,0.0006178869,0.0012302212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048265692,0.0000060419407,0.00009194993,0.000038076963,0.0000031146749,0.000020168307,0.0006681979,0.00029767837,0.00007226455,0.98614883,0.012641513,0.0000072727667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037234523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002457826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017974844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004087728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004324688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09506118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605641722","doi":"10.1002/tht3.71","title":"The Epistemology of Prejudice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Introspection; Culpability; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Criminology","score_opus":0.032070464176204586,"score_gpt":0.30618113263398367,"score_spread":0.2741106684577791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605641722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05995074,0.02093122,0.14100008,0.089652866,0.0025352458,0.00010434891,0.00016428338,0.00010722061,0.68555397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643701,0.004039419,0.014110761,0.007180281,0.0010805535,0.00013544939,0.000061865285,0.000074664065,0.008946911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982945,0.011043055,0.00069896196,0.0018821745,0.0022923292,0.0011384839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851857,0.0090784,0.0012065745,0.0022824442,0.0014257885,0.00082102156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012773016,0.00083102245,0.000909656,0.0038671785,0.008585262,0.010056208,0.002126899,0.0060602957,0.00365337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020058999,0.0005227707,0.0010236977,0.0018566665,0.08622867,0.011825953,0.010368514,0.008728832,0.00063181494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043792097,0.0000060553493,0.00027627707,0.00004501321,0.000006670051,0.00005217144,0.0057555647,0.00007817115,0.000058415975,0.9904953,0.000565351,0.0026565548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004772386,0.0000064367982,0.00014289851,0.00012068209,0.000004938725,0.00008671392,0.0020492424,0.00013701821,0.000092197384,0.9764965,0.020851739,0.000006943675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029337464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019054462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012773016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004911769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004231927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06755102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1799915287","doi":"10.1002/tht3.100","title":"Basic Knowledge and Contextualist “E = K”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Identification (biology); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.06956186225621573,"score_gpt":0.27674724919219484,"score_spread":0.2071853869359791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1799915287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03718149,0.0066174637,0.23870575,0.11837629,0.0010968489,0.0002362987,0.0002562827,0.00018842448,0.5973412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416484,0.0013281186,0.04025647,0.009214202,0.00047079808,0.00030101408,0.00006698218,0.0000726472,0.006641382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98081034,0.012221446,0.0012018485,0.0027100556,0.002128935,0.0009274172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97146535,0.018511128,0.0018054317,0.0051375236,0.0022766425,0.000803867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020667022,0.0007613102,0.001076872,0.0029094035,0.006067311,0.008413833,0.0020866413,0.0058453814,0.0049172067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024171354,0.00094954047,0.001129833,0.0023857413,0.09547172,0.020596692,0.009996233,0.008167667,0.00063607696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006589654,0.0000027494636,0.000068858564,0.00003788993,0.0000047379062,0.000022919288,0.0010984868,0.000045617195,0.000024071858,0.99735343,0.0002960823,0.0010386575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011032305,0.0000067053825,0.000100927566,0.00008142492,0.0000056952904,0.00004167179,0.0006909558,0.00010602164,0.00008891466,0.9894546,0.009404291,0.000007767084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049533625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005573275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020667022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005106231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051261066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109298944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1861935076","doi":"10.1002/tht3.163","title":"Sensitivity, Causality, and Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Université de Montréal; University of Glasgow; European Commission","keywords":"Causation; Impossibility; Sensitivity (control systems); Causality (physics); Rest (music); Counterexample; Statistical evidence; Epistemology; Modal; Econometrics; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2065072938505597,"score_gpt":0.42507689479463623,"score_spread":0.21856960094407654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1861935076","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17776075,0.021470113,0.39261088,0.18220021,0.0015076578,0.00028816194,0.00031581675,0.00028820263,0.22355819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781885,0.0015884492,0.014988571,0.0029897385,0.00048432912,0.00008556535,0.00002099222,0.00002411319,0.0016297309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9508871,0.02941879,0.002544477,0.0046523064,0.010530711,0.0019665824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8394582,0.14132552,0.0067010457,0.0056577157,0.0050372696,0.0018201334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052880522,0.0005546047,0.0019738737,0.0047672316,0.004791962,0.013803847,0.0029334119,0.008928979,0.0045788884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15023921,0.0012685771,0.000978951,0.0031825725,0.047308695,0.022588361,0.007847033,0.010016605,0.00028624455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008957438,0.0000077736195,0.00025493614,0.000030157811,0.000012867908,0.00004517847,0.00039971396,0.0005846545,0.000028936314,0.99607253,0.00026784453,0.002286642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008862918,0.0000035451926,0.000110098124,0.000019245537,0.000004398309,0.000011534197,0.00007486883,0.00069622457,0.0000326636,0.99825364,0.00077701325,0.000007843691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004583405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026788013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052880522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008775732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0089785615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2796623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131318859","doi":"10.1002/tht3.149","title":"Well-Being, Self-Regarding Reasons, and Morality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Morality; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.022198487836265938,"score_gpt":0.3191771512198415,"score_spread":0.2969786633835756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131318859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15455706,0.022412444,0.031311918,0.18168637,0.0008271965,0.00007706735,0.0000791413,0.000062281666,0.60898656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858271,0.0022359062,0.002902915,0.0045644008,0.00016887567,0.000039354803,0.000016099828,0.000017461154,0.004227807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993473,0.0046402668,0.00015703881,0.00045542966,0.00076246663,0.0005117502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994013,0.0032265643,0.0008912904,0.00043027705,0.0005757732,0.0008630477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008855391,0.00034096724,0.00040086568,0.00087362743,0.0039522075,0.006938937,0.0008580229,0.0039670607,0.002868323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076274266,0.00020883352,0.0003793522,0.0006968138,0.055278007,0.005740346,0.003916719,0.005676614,0.00034929937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055448118,0.0000145819085,0.00044693382,0.000023842358,0.00000415737,0.000045786994,0.0068555702,0.000088887384,0.00006215888,0.98905116,0.00083668093,0.0025646007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072517114,0.000018733675,0.0011493565,0.00013035658,0.000004642954,0.000118964126,0.00620044,0.00016584546,0.00008638761,0.9666332,0.025470335,0.000014430637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001875724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015079301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008855391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003286491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026396974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046832323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493854963","doi":"10.1002/tht3.210","title":"Essence Facts and Explanation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030884694775852716,"score_gpt":0.3020228605549769,"score_spread":0.2711381657791242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493854963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063546956,0.03259626,0.29091644,0.06977175,0.0018287292,0.00013795956,0.0011986151,0.00047321658,0.53953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9273168,0.007498618,0.039425485,0.0043644425,0.0014377108,0.00011345663,0.0009130056,0.00013818704,0.018792333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979552,0.0008204004,0.00012691767,0.0004122375,0.00041306057,0.00027215877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963006,0.0022131195,0.00027089767,0.00071987085,0.00036838185,0.00012705779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028490615,0.0005673065,0.00059364334,0.002188269,0.0020148675,0.0037064725,0.0012472288,0.003470077,0.011311178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073724044,0.000495191,0.0010915145,0.0013492955,0.012107353,0.012968054,0.003439766,0.0039862986,0.0009781258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052434157,0.0000027631543,0.00016051272,0.000028153332,0.0000060131306,0.000028291919,0.00022552446,0.00015216124,0.00004060732,0.99606293,0.0008712975,0.0024165004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004842226,0.0000023685977,0.00021685555,0.0000220915,0.000004529038,0.00004960889,0.00008424492,0.00032087188,0.000050806553,0.9900613,0.009177787,0.0000047084036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029140606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016818367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011311178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020872988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012728167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03783965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524483968","doi":"10.1002/tht3.213","title":"Actionability Judgments Cause Knowledge Judgments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12007274588769724,"score_gpt":0.313337800412243,"score_spread":0.1932650545245458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524483968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69498324,0.0021000376,0.105506964,0.0067199124,0.00067016593,0.00073581113,0.001102129,0.001066509,0.18711534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846628,0.00029706402,0.011224955,0.0008508353,0.00011115058,0.00011358056,0.00036705745,0.0001642143,0.0022084021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783245,0.008228447,0.0011417755,0.0060863975,0.0053023817,0.0009165836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72749627,0.21827029,0.026769714,0.0154616805,0.00954793,0.0024540904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013915315,0.00091633765,0.00071844284,0.0019270318,0.0012934492,0.002580963,0.00096918806,0.002363567,0.015554919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19718058,0.0011619875,0.0013500821,0.00081806805,0.0041012303,0.009052111,0.003385905,0.0037698292,0.00068613776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005218427,0.003120364,0.23620366,0.0059129284,0.0024559272,0.0019625938,0.0387899,0.0181901,0.06467157,0.38683453,0.008992507,0.22764754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084008666,0.0011879127,0.3453941,0.00057718623,0.0011751456,0.0011771063,0.0045137145,0.018997842,0.03587062,0.56555074,0.024280349,0.00043511254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006292442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049696225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015554919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020386474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017009451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07359213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792277594","doi":"10.1002/tht3.267","title":"The Cut-Free Approach and the Admissibility-Curry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Metatheory; Criticism; Intuitionistic logic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Law; Linear logic","score_opus":0.03584329057771598,"score_gpt":0.24377705222429283,"score_spread":0.20793376164657684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792277594","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030974487,0.008326745,0.68983114,0.066911004,0.001597416,0.00017092185,0.0003036293,0.00044882402,0.20143583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80357033,0.0025388564,0.15274498,0.013239879,0.0019213125,0.0005250858,0.00020360194,0.00043040037,0.024825629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98942435,0.003919585,0.00069296313,0.0019648406,0.0033701414,0.00062808284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98161674,0.011093823,0.0009143405,0.003503904,0.0022579806,0.00061318284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014467115,0.0007970861,0.0014651428,0.003070749,0.004162665,0.0064932103,0.0039013082,0.005775146,0.005128865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022491183,0.0012603273,0.0028932558,0.0013814555,0.02899571,0.018582428,0.006168857,0.012449249,0.0010089504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004204669,0.0000027414528,0.000015925212,0.000013833229,0.0000042548163,0.000016002903,0.00008386025,0.00009511788,0.00004418118,0.9985796,0.00035679922,0.0007834685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004178319,0.0000034267769,0.00001495395,0.000009854695,0.000002999276,0.000017582877,0.00001734528,0.00034615723,0.00007590637,0.99760973,0.0018942563,0.000003636885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019139617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001480778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014467115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058169533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032398275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07651037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792378140","doi":"10.1002/tht3.263","title":"Against Existential Grounding","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Ground; Philosophy; Physics; Linguistics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.0437556829156535,"score_gpt":0.3320311971522997,"score_spread":0.28827551423664616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792378140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09185155,0.007567374,0.2527127,0.1794343,0.0035119473,0.00018498335,0.0007314105,0.0008863679,0.46311936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94108707,0.0019233878,0.022631725,0.020501923,0.0018979745,0.00016073397,0.00034310736,0.0003786729,0.011075323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98481375,0.005789865,0.00089615764,0.0033679914,0.0036466995,0.0014856172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706232,0.01793747,0.0012691544,0.0059112394,0.003383663,0.00087530026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020447684,0.0010375911,0.0019406638,0.0020884948,0.004142294,0.006155351,0.0033069174,0.008567669,0.0071404898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040363215,0.0009964354,0.001955249,0.0013115354,0.03334131,0.019029427,0.010811485,0.018561153,0.0015579973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033741962,0.000009525538,0.00032210178,0.000068829126,0.00002392953,0.000111305206,0.0010125422,0.00017182087,0.00015882426,0.99148285,0.002396524,0.004207882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023436578,0.000013219234,0.0001964279,0.000119941906,0.000020864554,0.00012144628,0.0005066645,0.00058067695,0.00039933305,0.9802762,0.017726026,0.000015728678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025059197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018090301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020447684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034153212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020560287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10813898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901886758","doi":"10.1002/tht3.394","title":"The Hierarchy of Fregean Senses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.02879752274494847,"score_gpt":0.3203073444967785,"score_spread":0.29150982175183004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901886758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15639041,0.0043901484,0.2896416,0.0073579224,0.00035371602,0.00007494298,0.000462029,0.0006098268,0.5407195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481942,0.0008729306,0.040204067,0.0007037914,0.00021846169,0.00011305662,0.00022678326,0.00012888467,0.009337649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924314,0.0024137155,0.000534002,0.0015401236,0.0023302638,0.0007503473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917413,0.0043535684,0.00041096922,0.0015920902,0.0014466572,0.00045553094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053743115,0.0007471948,0.0009581466,0.003765478,0.0038551895,0.0065432596,0.001429011,0.0019218561,0.006146327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011757115,0.00079438515,0.0010966308,0.0012856048,0.018823123,0.019278308,0.0057231034,0.0045694765,0.0011326758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006076033,0.0000034033403,0.00010592047,0.000017045355,0.0000039713527,0.000015831314,0.00044224894,0.000076170174,0.00018289639,0.99624157,0.00024534273,0.002659602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039816982,0.000006776689,0.00021211902,0.000018945379,0.0000036244023,0.00003934464,0.000106686995,0.00029040634,0.000103927865,0.9958901,0.0033160036,0.000008164944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016361753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016016909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065432596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025092617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011297782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028422415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901933380","doi":"10.1002/tht3.398","title":"Metaphysical Vagueness Without Vague Objects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme","keywords":"Vagueness; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Abstraction; Legitimacy; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.03392288595889619,"score_gpt":0.3308243290956619,"score_spread":0.2969014431367657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901933380","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13105153,0.013295828,0.48850787,0.07227374,0.0015460732,0.00010196797,0.00017712552,0.0004037872,0.2926422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95193225,0.0017144225,0.03175824,0.0042410963,0.00058609236,0.00009075277,0.00006566994,0.00007889025,0.009532552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973558,0.0010266728,0.00021295209,0.00038621202,0.00084438274,0.00017396944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933194,0.003803151,0.00073165237,0.001169862,0.0007510648,0.00022488549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055367504,0.00046506632,0.0007613857,0.0014873615,0.0017565356,0.0058696526,0.0012597032,0.003744723,0.0025688317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013354413,0.0005435953,0.00091349194,0.0008953396,0.019411495,0.013133528,0.00408531,0.004886159,0.00051442283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005922884,0.0000021241788,0.000044872664,0.000013131247,0.0000024520739,0.000022586344,0.0002658231,0.00014584266,0.000104086204,0.9980782,0.00024943304,0.0010654794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036024583,0.00000433828,0.00006160571,0.000015674159,0.0000024306137,0.00003619203,0.0000752717,0.0005705897,0.00013825967,0.99510586,0.0039796275,0.000006525287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086103025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059145264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058696526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001624053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001048286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029281497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947228016","doi":"10.1002/tht3.419","title":"Constitutive and Consequentialist Essence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Assimilation (phonology); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019159426496319264,"score_gpt":0.2964437146430562,"score_spread":0.27728428814673695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947228016","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10481005,0.004434726,0.522773,0.018445035,0.00059115724,0.00013813615,0.00018051211,0.00027205513,0.34835532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94960356,0.00095305225,0.039780088,0.0012792472,0.00029802517,0.00013935534,0.00009178924,0.00010942341,0.007745486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450725,0.0020566406,0.0003953136,0.0010972627,0.00150952,0.0004340027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942603,0.0024291612,0.000634043,0.0016421007,0.0007118988,0.0003225405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008594513,0.00036490874,0.00074330927,0.0020338267,0.0023655004,0.004854747,0.0013166461,0.0026602522,0.0030364434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00807405,0.00040890407,0.0014650862,0.0010743196,0.02492779,0.013740911,0.0062898453,0.0042240135,0.00036719884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017358595,0.0000027564722,0.00006728742,0.0000121508565,0.000001943733,0.0000073640153,0.0005598942,0.000048001784,0.000055025394,0.9984074,0.000069383845,0.00076699065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003973328,0.000009515117,0.00023223014,0.000025667356,0.000005666303,0.000057247285,0.00025198635,0.00038775426,0.00013341707,0.9898108,0.009076397,0.0000052947985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078744494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008188218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008594513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027133166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019430157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045452654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953614120","doi":"10.1002/tht3.417","title":"Knowledge from Falsehood","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Premise; Verdict; Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07153808595598073,"score_gpt":0.27900952413600877,"score_spread":0.20747143818002806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953614120","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12365752,0.008693379,0.52885675,0.10845254,0.0020710563,0.00021195045,0.00068774883,0.0005293855,0.22683969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489281,0.0019627875,0.034715775,0.008952807,0.0010630159,0.00016406718,0.00023857226,0.00013374948,0.0038410446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752008,0.014642246,0.0013323579,0.003993918,0.003847603,0.0009829884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8935657,0.08510692,0.00399737,0.011888438,0.004514589,0.00092706026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022739502,0.0009704049,0.0013827059,0.002347238,0.0038112518,0.005862231,0.002377723,0.0061284425,0.0075467667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09363789,0.0011023601,0.0019299974,0.0011411133,0.04573201,0.031717125,0.006989709,0.0106120575,0.0009158485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010430964,0.000020857511,0.001268151,0.0002557365,0.000066796885,0.00039138022,0.004507257,0.00062483683,0.00034932207,0.97689223,0.0026736446,0.012845413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016409402,0.0000114246,0.0002732405,0.00007428995,0.000017221293,0.00023554265,0.00034337817,0.0007150052,0.00034288925,0.9919532,0.0060026417,0.000014648047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017021382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077572354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022739502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034825671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017512068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120259404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093794830","doi":"10.1002/tht3.470","title":"Desolation sound: Social practices of natural beauty","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Beauty; Natural (archaeology); Sound (geography); Aesthetics; Value (mathematics); Counterexample; Art; Computer science; Mathematics; History; Acoustics; Physics","score_opus":0.0582772348523895,"score_gpt":0.3096350281006884,"score_spread":0.2513577932482989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093794830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055477057,0.0027511327,0.040831856,0.0596655,0.00059570686,0.000036318743,0.000042384283,0.00010397018,0.8404962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757415,0.00055721734,0.0055833734,0.0019880298,0.00013303368,0.000038680097,0.000014276057,0.000040945244,0.015902935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956475,0.0027993305,0.00008081951,0.00042482166,0.0007762551,0.0002713112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970553,0.0013043212,0.00031153593,0.0006203471,0.00051380415,0.00019468571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038377394,0.00033086233,0.0002676295,0.0009876546,0.0043521654,0.0059214006,0.0007400989,0.0029124012,0.003945568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050290697,0.00019688894,0.00034332095,0.0007941906,0.056098007,0.005983528,0.0044151135,0.004117685,0.0004178119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004742293,0.000004801737,0.00011586111,0.0000140840475,0.0000016540134,0.000020368,0.0053013326,0.00006446397,0.000096154334,0.99130964,0.00092245766,0.0021444417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012624214,0.000018301676,0.00042131654,0.000060586462,0.0000059178938,0.00008544712,0.006023331,0.0003734274,0.00026544568,0.91342926,0.07929392,0.000010520961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026395395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045953398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059214006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036711486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002054597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026636243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131993214","doi":"10.1002/tht3.473","title":"Surprise, surprise: KK is innocent","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Surprise; Analogy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Blame; Counterintuitive; Wright; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; History; Social psychology; Art history","score_opus":0.08003400529711314,"score_gpt":0.2827868260427748,"score_spread":0.20275282074566164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131993214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06264551,0.006002367,0.14383164,0.22482084,0.0039016749,0.000078513585,0.00020909678,0.000676044,0.5578343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940491,0.0010223063,0.009693902,0.020389404,0.0009136912,0.00008852501,0.00005174898,0.00029142344,0.02705797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464816,0.002353665,0.00025615725,0.0011076545,0.0010935115,0.0005409424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98618096,0.009136295,0.0009721918,0.0016337703,0.0014340288,0.0006427328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006198048,0.00053283,0.00077587215,0.00086518016,0.004394896,0.0073099714,0.001215356,0.005367467,0.007051201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029947298,0.0005114546,0.00084799994,0.00055119896,0.023452848,0.020392293,0.0059776804,0.00894119,0.0014376965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004420736,0.000008924807,0.00025300798,0.000056593755,0.000008420123,0.0002533484,0.0030478986,0.00019910651,0.0001696111,0.9810425,0.0100943865,0.0048219864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130210055,0.000014219858,0.00020906614,0.00004752976,0.000008369706,0.0002532061,0.0010847523,0.0006022032,0.00026563345,0.9694177,0.02806592,0.000018376068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034656774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020583987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073099714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00391938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031383275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0327788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175943036","doi":"10.1002/tht3.500","title":"Seeing and attending wholes and parts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Counterexample; Pace; Virtue; Psychology; Crowding; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.0315117463361862,"score_gpt":0.3053472851435999,"score_spread":0.2738355388074137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175943036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18817113,0.0052197035,0.18458198,0.014313988,0.0005392713,0.00008813766,0.00013321977,0.0005402609,0.60641223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600372,0.0009478343,0.018635508,0.0017624547,0.00012590429,0.00005391758,0.00005393188,0.0001430204,0.01824029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908483,0.00029382517,0.000023015109,0.0002967338,0.00015962357,0.0001420156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880195,0.00068522233,0.000078852514,0.00024334191,0.00008284583,0.0001078404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009272891,0.000369395,0.0004332231,0.0006330883,0.0015973656,0.0039448915,0.0008368216,0.0018181994,0.0068972413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023334625,0.00047332814,0.00076492847,0.00032101973,0.016555808,0.009993846,0.0037457303,0.0022725544,0.000782788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072706476,0.000013992218,0.000625877,0.00010509317,0.000015579211,0.00019356063,0.009400657,0.00036110898,0.0032027136,0.96620196,0.0018635513,0.017943202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024518851,0.000067054694,0.0029247743,0.000075749005,0.00003421877,0.00052589463,0.0025754026,0.0013265307,0.0022444653,0.9389076,0.051266115,0.00002769958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023997289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014604792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068972413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014428103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007199195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023073554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216365467","doi":"10.1002/tht3.505","title":"On performatives being statements too","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Performative utterance; Statement (logic); Falsity; Utterance; Epistemology; Speech act; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Linguistics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03629788040243592,"score_gpt":0.3620852785516364,"score_spread":0.3257873981492005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216365467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0285194,0.004200084,0.05440027,0.012426638,0.0014102989,0.00010142742,0.00031523773,0.00017410376,0.89845246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8895871,0.0038795911,0.013698762,0.0062229843,0.002475501,0.00036973096,0.0006117252,0.00040033914,0.08275427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99253076,0.0038107757,0.0003539498,0.0014423933,0.0011853364,0.00067681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994311,0.002722209,0.00043453777,0.001132012,0.0011126915,0.00028759017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047270926,0.0012967008,0.0006893934,0.0017339092,0.004461307,0.00941266,0.0013531349,0.0041746427,0.012727045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077210944,0.000702653,0.0007601376,0.0013850881,0.03440804,0.021142248,0.0066659437,0.005457895,0.0036533265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071077725,0.0000025191828,0.00004827283,0.000019145944,0.000002512165,0.00003875244,0.003694906,0.00002584026,0.00010631236,0.9939008,0.0009010166,0.0012528861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012733127,0.000024139092,0.00039897632,0.000112330934,0.000013035458,0.00018332303,0.0038327598,0.0002220122,0.00033116934,0.85491943,0.1399282,0.000021839092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029329988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016932067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012727045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024056975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011315829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042576253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229698470","doi":"10.1002/tht.27","title":"Aha! Trick Questions, Independence, and the Epistemology of Disagreement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Epistemology; Independence (probability theory); sort; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.039163960784125124,"score_gpt":0.2591638248835249,"score_spread":0.21999986409939978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229698470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10175768,0.0029224511,0.36459392,0.08566601,0.001093239,0.00026034992,0.00032496135,0.00046225934,0.44291902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549253,0.0003633771,0.030885825,0.0036644635,0.0003444144,0.00024363109,0.000114424474,0.00014147685,0.009316979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96627307,0.022569189,0.001380292,0.0029834914,0.004767236,0.0020267377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9271019,0.056803748,0.002746536,0.008573394,0.003512528,0.0012618923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029009199,0.00076505204,0.0012827929,0.0028640602,0.012598905,0.0081391735,0.0029419593,0.009909796,0.009733935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066902034,0.00095620775,0.001786527,0.0020228636,0.052102152,0.024496272,0.01299333,0.013951642,0.0012640427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002440712,0.000009442208,0.0003343318,0.000031063286,0.0000064404758,0.00015863677,0.003600514,0.00016399055,0.00007302718,0.99158174,0.0014706027,0.0025457325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002412485,0.0000069620182,0.00015012089,0.000048274072,0.0000053286567,0.00020902575,0.0011662262,0.0011465912,0.00020785094,0.9826888,0.01433129,0.00001548798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024309498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013397456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029009199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003871886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002243363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15341711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295993527","doi":"10.5840/tht2022912","title":"A Higher-Order Approach to Diachronic Continence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Normative; Order (exchange); Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07426243732536746,"score_gpt":0.2699445828771557,"score_spread":0.19568214555178826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295993527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022010151,0.0035854036,0.32656202,0.020129396,0.0005871006,0.000084974236,0.0001899696,0.0002744312,0.6265765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905311,0.001371205,0.06031996,0.0019974094,0.00052109064,0.00014777729,0.00010805546,0.00016968719,0.03005391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954436,0.0025218125,0.00023143826,0.00063425937,0.0007557776,0.00041313807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935514,0.0035522273,0.00048668784,0.0014345187,0.0007062551,0.00026893814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004696515,0.00062237965,0.00054372667,0.0026355092,0.0032863223,0.0079314215,0.0019913986,0.0029357767,0.00919524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008078573,0.0005311263,0.0011639883,0.001267163,0.028823176,0.01391506,0.004403492,0.0052083377,0.0012488972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020822515,0.0000016966404,0.00003618197,0.000006890017,0.0000012031833,0.00001287037,0.00042731082,0.000063447515,0.000020865682,0.9986916,0.00013808055,0.0005978432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004064475,0.000003934326,0.000072180985,0.000021029637,0.000002731165,0.000042009986,0.00016980994,0.0005469965,0.00007693598,0.98879015,0.0102643315,0.000005893058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030414013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003077126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00919524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005851564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019844642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04245627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323904039","doi":"10.5840/tht20233815","title":"Reconciling the Epistemic and the Zetetic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06218353819122607,"score_gpt":0.2499699023227975,"score_spread":0.18778636413157143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323904039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04409477,0.007868374,0.2094664,0.33372495,0.00317039,0.000060998027,0.00008246187,0.00024613828,0.4012855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95203435,0.0019548405,0.015741933,0.016924083,0.0016371666,0.00016815471,0.000042433654,0.00016187776,0.011335163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96584654,0.018116392,0.0014687529,0.0027494114,0.009907976,0.001911045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670848,0.020334443,0.002713776,0.0040437826,0.004213979,0.0016090793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029061977,0.0006693741,0.0010143225,0.002713635,0.0053474796,0.014315005,0.0023994173,0.006445876,0.002490432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044974767,0.0005215073,0.00055212225,0.0013712699,0.07201401,0.022902792,0.015520571,0.010763269,0.0005702358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062786016,0.00000364072,0.000053146818,0.000011852689,0.0000019542924,0.000010896914,0.00071910117,0.00006310938,0.000025544421,0.997141,0.0004281083,0.0015353088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009046336,0.000008372927,0.000110315676,0.000059490187,0.0000026671771,0.000022597182,0.0009466806,0.00029311434,0.00013730252,0.9823272,0.0160755,0.0000076124998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019448283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030080602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029061977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073533338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008481124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15369624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402783746","doi":"10.5840/tht202492035","title":"Recruitment Revisited","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thought A Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.3600932633523501,"score_gpt":0.4962339274580881,"score_spread":0.136140664105738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402783746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029775796,0.01074568,0.16602583,0.1415845,0.0023544244,0.00018011474,0.00014436235,0.00044882493,0.6487404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8167115,0.004787094,0.023605268,0.028010378,0.0028893792,0.0007431286,0.00014623828,0.0003818209,0.12272517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334323,0.0024340134,0.00025440907,0.0017716606,0.0014073118,0.0007894386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942022,0.0032574837,0.0003435662,0.0007405618,0.00083501684,0.0006212148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009366547,0.00075072737,0.00097357755,0.0018847899,0.004200221,0.004856655,0.003159462,0.005135904,0.020523332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01539633,0.00045352473,0.0015564597,0.0010724717,0.021259658,0.01630872,0.0085920505,0.0067743827,0.0036131367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014297309,0.00000794776,0.00025370417,0.00004857834,0.0000034970064,0.00007562707,0.0011598971,0.00014632542,0.00014903651,0.9848535,0.0032546546,0.010032909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022262055,0.000022396893,0.0005050682,0.00008512807,0.00000572718,0.0003549186,0.00051466184,0.0010652671,0.00019937838,0.9327735,0.0644371,0.000014752073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030328599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018204863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020523332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005914337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004438474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0686574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}