{"meta":{"query_hash":"f1674ccff5da","filters":{"venue":"Transforming Anthropology"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f1674ccff5da","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Transforming+Anthropology"},"results":[{"id":"W2144403410","doi":"10.1111/traa.12015_7","title":":Theories of Religion: A Reader. Seth D. Kunin (ed.), with Miles‐Watson Jonathan. New Brunswick, NJ, and London, UK: Rutgers University Press, 2006. iv + 524 pp. (Cloth US$78.00; Paper US$35.95)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transforming Anthropology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Art history; Memphis; Media studies; History; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Geology","score_opus":0.009386659988797381,"score_gpt":0.2631970535470254,"score_spread":0.253810393558228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144403410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75120944,0.025828347,0.005028712,0.057628583,0.0017798268,0.0022593634,0.00010413675,0.00059919275,0.15556242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8514199,0.1405117,0.0010294107,0.0008900093,0.00019731725,0.0000068427225,0.000019621259,0.000039279872,0.0058858953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797046,0.00026232784,0.00035027225,0.00044209414,0.00034410076,0.00063072436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987831,0.0002705174,0.00017679633,0.00027247233,0.00019656727,0.00030052607],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002849701,0.00028405583,0.00047937577,0.00006708629,0.0009515869,0.00006619528,0.00030369687,0.00037233683,0.0010524733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000453127,0.00025692294,0.00016816148,0.0003413048,0.0034596159,0.00064150087,0.000028198338,0.00040205312,0.000024414916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077534874,0.00043877738,0.026545096,0.00021373524,0.00059700315,0.000083298764,0.11183878,0.00007837282,0.005843156,0.24909578,0.6002779,0.0042127706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002126793,0.00065655157,0.00089600834,0.00022625474,0.00020238632,0.00007517525,0.035271607,0.00005823243,0.0054211426,0.0025740939,0.9517933,0.0006984559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4088127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02127714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38753557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011432539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007118556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767265527","doi":"10.1111/traa.12101","title":"Beyond Genealogies: Expertise and Religious Knowledge in Legal Cases Involving African Diasporic Publics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transforming Anthropology","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Knowledge production; Publics; Power (physics); Ethnic group; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Anthropology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04539941828925477,"score_gpt":0.36540455861240895,"score_spread":0.3200051403231542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767265527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96475935,0.008720784,0.000052310774,0.007983986,0.0013926801,0.0002619526,0.0000102069735,0.000107630236,0.016711097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392165,0.015393055,0.00006875657,0.000087548906,0.00032795838,0.00002909687,0.0000026876762,0.000018273184,0.00015097194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983879,0.00014073952,0.0002858627,0.00036568544,0.00015090377,0.00066892727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991272,0.0002654043,0.00009846466,0.00029728535,0.000048492704,0.00016312931],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049117795,0.00017808219,0.00033780903,0.00018737122,0.001758654,0.00017395288,0.00040608816,0.00022760042,0.000049271574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034415905,0.00017944447,0.00006781052,0.00015469239,0.0028822399,0.0005225916,0.00005216938,0.00022174462,0.0000069660014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012873056,0.00035418433,0.025897602,0.0000835154,0.000055721815,0.0009972259,0.711626,0.0000026428606,0.0003262073,0.071889855,0.00088848226,0.18774982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065728114,0.0016365685,0.0631471,0.00025544036,0.00022565063,0.00036857408,0.47977832,0.00036759963,0.0033346214,0.024820192,0.41680196,0.002691177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114641346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.340444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41591346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016957257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035544694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796229505","doi":"10.1111/traa.12109","title":":Uncertain Tastes: Memory, Ambivalence and the Politics of Eating in Samburu, Northern Kenya. Holtzman Jon. Berkeley, CA, and London, UK: University of California Press, 2009. ix + 285 pp. (Cloth US$85.00; Paper US$29.95; EBook US$29.95)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transforming Anthropology","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Citation; Politics; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.010198603187852236,"score_gpt":0.25121305936298305,"score_spread":0.24101445617513081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796229505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745452,0.0099765,0.00008151183,0.0012014733,0.00023469476,0.00054345943,0.0002659997,0.00003537001,0.013115831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99315697,0.0058608903,0.00015930075,0.0001653829,0.00013132312,0.0000039315723,0.0000067834867,0.000016742566,0.0004986919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777126,0.00040450363,0.0004405902,0.0003948614,0.00032703247,0.00066173973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887204,0.00029314464,0.00021648352,0.00024926983,0.00022321261,0.00014582522],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006918458,0.00024890306,0.0005769501,0.000052749194,0.0011620941,0.000023645222,0.00038606743,0.00025944746,0.00029926412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011909503,0.00022503505,0.00009429434,0.00023419289,0.013216258,0.00021460096,0.00008371704,0.00026263657,0.00000559904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002171685,0.00055698707,0.69243675,0.000971208,0.000383798,0.00014613105,0.22401686,0.00008320673,0.0024479516,0.055048212,0.006230617,0.0155066075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011112863,0.0028546792,0.035238624,0.0012024823,0.0007648043,0.00009578692,0.10556449,0.0008167237,0.0028201991,0.011048822,0.82659274,0.0018877909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56678414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43938002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8203621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013985744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032388038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98946923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014645237","doi":"10.1111/traa.12169","title":"Pelau MasQUEERade: Making Caribbean Queer Diasporic Space in the Toronto Pride Parade","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transforming Anthropology","topic":"Caribbean history, culture, and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Parade; Pride; Gender studies; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Ethnography; Aesthetics; History; Anthropology; Art; Art history; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03857872171536836,"score_gpt":0.3309563814027947,"score_spread":0.29237765968742635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014645237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2863784,0.021739846,0.0077152285,0.27528793,0.005392025,0.0027472072,0.00013414418,0.0007733704,0.39983183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995189,0.0009462714,0.00013597333,0.002582316,0.0008234249,0.000019292691,0.000007667404,0.000021438904,0.00027461234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997934,0.00038216132,0.00030501478,0.00031988285,0.0003417696,0.0007171912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993665,0.00019746741,0.00006753387,0.00018981652,0.000034110162,0.00014457337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005220709,0.00019857608,0.00030712102,0.00003386459,0.00061432406,0.000035073863,0.00045428853,0.00023236206,0.00054444856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011304644,0.00016433028,0.00013858387,0.00024793574,0.0010289695,0.00021813964,0.000012338485,0.00038709276,0.000029584782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035225403,0.000050807015,0.0024108274,0.000038852195,0.000022264154,0.00009603135,0.6456599,0.00001781982,0.000066113564,0.34416452,0.0051499163,0.0022876975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043573213,0.00013811541,0.0016202338,0.000020564743,0.000057912977,0.000017063065,0.23448704,0.000033287506,0.00011340926,0.0008732863,0.7618737,0.00032965647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061489712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13634926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75672376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004139844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023192816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9447599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403679923","doi":"10.1086/731889","title":"“South-South” Capitalist Extractive Patriarchy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transforming Anthropology","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.022992928323346103,"score_gpt":0.35236352004033494,"score_spread":0.32937059171698885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403679923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7193763,0.024208827,0.0051685264,0.022875821,0.008698679,0.0006778836,0.000032346008,0.0015219196,0.21743964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404776,0.0015676256,0.000097817705,0.00007735263,0.0006193136,0.00001243203,0.000007634712,0.00002745974,0.003542617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984336,0.00018546353,0.00023350489,0.00034702904,0.00023476526,0.0005656404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993645,0.00030031963,0.00002748606,0.00012701318,0.000046318582,0.00013433884],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047768388,0.00015628406,0.00022282288,0.0001693092,0.00082956225,0.00009685665,0.00020133397,0.000327167,0.0026315483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008295584,0.00013368874,0.0001523777,0.00041471276,0.0018897752,0.00019676972,0.000010345332,0.0004169291,0.0005195862],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003648466,0.000042021835,0.00042024467,0.00003785626,0.00014877939,0.00024812625,0.88375247,0.000008462228,0.00020636247,0.07423135,0.0007222427,0.040145595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033242058,0.0001665714,0.00008845516,0.00011041702,0.00013823017,0.000026644198,0.37822995,0.00009155407,0.0011949914,0.006710494,0.6124979,0.0004123712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043901247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057360163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61177564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009249807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002259321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}