{"meta":{"query_hash":"18c2cdcec9e9","filters":{"venue":"UC Irvine law review"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/18c2cdcec9e9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=UC+Irvine+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W2766035516","doi":"","title":"Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Human Rights and Regulatory Lessons from Lilly v Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investor-state dispute settlement; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Intellectual property; Revocation; State (computer science); Law and economics; Settlement (finance); Law; Enforcement; Complaint; Political science; Business; Economics; Engineering; Foreign direct investment; Finance; International investment","score_opus":0.024636860047612997,"score_gpt":0.2643363390335452,"score_spread":0.2396994789859322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766035516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12192708,0.013651638,0.000015677344,0.06653719,0.0015821359,0.0012796563,0.00023744136,0.00017399644,0.7945952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79524505,0.0007491329,0.00015482002,0.19566588,0.0015275234,0.00005879368,0.0007808044,0.00004661263,0.0057713487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884856,0.000014145607,0.00034070993,0.0002909569,0.0003172753,0.00018832757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894655,0.000013291378,0.00039649213,0.00049716514,0.00011349921,0.000033003864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002018607,0.00019348183,0.0002716131,0.00002605057,0.0010035784,0.00037528866,0.00038985713,0.000025542491,0.00068497943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026048829,0.00015809486,0.00005559063,0.000038886712,0.00012257855,0.0009567985,0.00020981985,0.00009912231,0.000093630086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016425403,0.00001543294,0.0005442166,0.0003721448,0.000033260552,0.000011779148,0.0000031645575,2.062373e-7,0.00004383025,0.9182016,0.080501154,0.00027157128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026361927,0.0000034433683,0.012016051,0.00096756214,0.00006398674,7.919248e-7,6.6620044e-7,0.000060173497,0.000050250812,0.025085617,0.96127975,0.0002081085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59434426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76242936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.893116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005342421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035622455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7718816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883061291","doi":"","title":"Copyright As a Property Right? Authorial Perspectives in Eighteenth-Century England","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Statute; Law; Property (philosophy); Intellectual property; Proposition; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Copyright Act; Sociology; Easement; History; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02152914237324407,"score_gpt":0.32519881301413256,"score_spread":0.3036696706408885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883061291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021164014,0.2346675,0.0000024686387,0.017027263,0.0014309543,0.0013190837,0.00001125136,0.00015116594,0.7432739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17218103,0.7919445,0.0006933161,0.0060340357,0.009409011,0.00016609125,0.000026570799,0.000040263883,0.019505197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997838,0.00052673655,0.00031434098,0.00040456568,0.00048246427,0.00043388334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916154,0.000047252837,0.00011008798,0.00028114635,0.0002446523,0.00015532855],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011466071,0.00019445528,0.00041040088,0.000005542509,0.0007101788,0.00008535195,0.00043300152,0.00019056341,0.006615215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023572163,0.00010854844,0.00018107507,0.0005053528,0.00084258337,0.00029596945,0.0000696358,0.00027670147,0.00066715496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020707614,0.0001551644,0.000056432964,0.0002875861,0.000027300164,0.00001561699,0.017093014,1.2197744e-8,0.000020369935,0.88218176,0.09801668,0.0021253712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043401503,0.00007773522,0.000026429429,0.0011485356,0.00004445466,0.0000035581504,0.00085744966,9.548766e-7,0.000027617722,0.0023580978,0.9948037,0.00021741533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002152373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00457544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89678705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016701616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016819978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99429286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895749759","doi":"","title":"Location Tracking by Police: The Regulation of ‘Tireless and Absolute Surveillance’","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Seriousness; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Tracking (education); Phone; Anonymity; License; Secrecy; Computer security; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03911756228731976,"score_gpt":0.3556573052824298,"score_spread":0.31653974299511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895749759","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14932753,0.6472947,0.00059557473,0.1017171,0.0008273841,0.0024672952,0.00002321201,0.0001758924,0.097571336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973919,0.02473448,0.000032044416,0.00082641555,0.0002117934,0.000005977449,0.000003403712,0.0000044809913,0.00026242295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991621,0.00017631236,0.00020714352,0.00011904386,0.00020612724,0.00012930328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932814,0.000117832155,0.00013749358,0.00017060283,0.00021007341,0.000035858546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012274652,0.00005957571,0.00015620832,0.000006671682,0.00030764556,0.000029205465,0.0001498153,0.000031793777,0.000116431656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011406112,0.00004180653,0.000027969229,0.00022622845,0.0004317193,0.00015096825,0.000023210489,0.00004034209,0.000016051443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021281832,0.00004618904,0.0009779164,0.0037739887,0.000021357053,2.4223735e-7,0.005548866,7.463969e-7,0.00089134293,0.7781016,0.04531926,0.16529717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005829572,0.000036586367,0.009939213,0.0019543008,0.000034817956,0.0000022966708,0.00013220613,0.00002501092,0.00014452629,0.00074064906,0.9868285,0.00010357938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015490247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013069734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94150925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019658397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029797604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969897283","doi":"","title":"Individual Choice of Law for Indigenous People in Canada: Reconciling Legal Pluralism with Human Rights?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05001393962651693,"score_gpt":0.3356475473879512,"score_spread":0.2856336077614343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969897283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350227,0.018928226,0.0000023206478,0.0044397945,0.00034783353,0.0031408712,0.000112513364,0.000058369253,0.03794733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967754,0.00055208604,0.00037173426,0.001431323,0.00038781538,0.000115032555,0.00002586728,0.000013567298,0.0003271855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807835,0.00016805173,0.00048304393,0.00027936895,0.00049844483,0.0004927379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888456,0.00021504505,0.00027034368,0.0001839428,0.00034083423,0.000105267776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000720527,0.00018965564,0.00064663094,0.000015420503,0.0011696628,0.000036981222,0.00040701198,0.00006354401,0.00015076624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012539787,0.00013199676,0.000079464146,0.00029596034,0.00040865014,0.00025111221,0.0000668745,0.00014718137,0.0000055128817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003986491,0.00020496796,0.026243996,0.00435324,0.00040621427,0.000020460153,0.05672052,0.0000031042584,0.0000555532,0.89974535,0.0073350323,0.0048716962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004901944,0.00014199488,0.0076681445,0.001661427,0.00011282964,0.0000013346429,0.0004360708,6.2816144e-7,0.000118314136,0.00021889409,0.9888492,0.0003009502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99685353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98151416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059638673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003997456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8996219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972374064","doi":"","title":"Transforming the Work of Geographical Indications to Decolonize Racialized Labor and Support Agroecology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Redress; Scholarship; Political economy; Sociology; Corporate governance; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.017774253332111873,"score_gpt":0.3017752557993181,"score_spread":0.2840010024672062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972374064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83607185,0.012938893,0.0001393085,0.11321417,0.0005795169,0.0042994376,0.000027467184,0.00015524853,0.032574084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712709,0.0017124199,0.00008351982,0.026404798,0.00040572675,0.000057988353,0.000011759093,0.000012156326,0.000040731054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989254,0.000044779154,0.00038723438,0.00019523298,0.00015427281,0.0002930648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992208,0.00008315435,0.00014689268,0.00024167416,0.00027557526,0.00003192314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084930414,0.00013818976,0.00038603245,0.00005738738,0.0003145938,0.0000610765,0.00025771162,0.000070234775,0.0003726356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004957593,0.00009560524,0.00011596948,0.0010702837,0.0003655957,0.0002304921,0.00008944571,0.000100185796,0.000046658213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008692003,0.00032759726,0.0598948,0.0047149598,0.00013395587,0.0000063840275,0.0009440797,2.5808876e-7,0.000022617352,0.8782278,0.010863158,0.04477749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034005314,0.000063903695,0.07172434,0.00034599652,0.00034557207,0.0000018710018,0.00016545407,0.0000010209782,0.000006338488,0.007620663,0.91920656,0.00017824079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005238061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096432155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9083434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000182216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037921127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40800986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}