{"meta":{"query_hash":"e5a8718c6e23","filters":{"venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e5a8718c6e23","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=UIC+Law+Open+Access+Repository+%28University+of+Illinois+at+Chicago%29"},"results":[{"id":"W2528229018","doi":"","title":"Town of Greece and City of Saguenay: Non-Establishment Principles with or without an Establishment Clause, 14 First Amend. L. Rev. 343 (2016)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04888247021302318,"score_gpt":0.2601085662785723,"score_spread":0.21122609606554915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528229018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94457144,0.000036320318,0.0006641342,0.00089828117,0.00022913654,0.00069696,0.00004788089,0.000035175235,0.0528207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233013,0.00017527497,0.0008127888,0.0001481125,0.00015629838,0.0000029128091,0.00002435,0.00002174275,0.0063283737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981285,0.000026355614,0.00044868392,0.00057661283,0.00055897346,0.0002608894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756956,0.00009573999,0.0010750905,0.0006009976,0.00059008686,0.0000685433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035006454,0.00025511053,0.0005874479,0.00014415917,0.00041323094,0.00032048894,0.0017579686,0.00011654843,0.000445773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046036712,0.00018377342,0.00007973606,0.00025230233,0.00097447063,0.004933449,0.0018173541,0.000104739505,0.000003419955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004899455,0.0015977984,0.9184433,0.00156539,0.00073914934,0.00012930104,0.0010715078,0.00017806047,0.0076377383,0.0544101,0.0073821023,0.0019460883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01609919,0.0012462129,0.64669317,0.004604482,0.0012441985,0.000064541535,0.0021425507,0.0020743946,0.03544094,0.0020405522,0.28601462,0.002335155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0235293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014809692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27863252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001322784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009621544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338844312","doi":"","title":"Lessons for the Hague: Internet Jurisdiction in Contract and Tort Cases in the European Community and the United States, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tort; Political science; Law; The Internet; Conflict of laws; Computer science; Liability","score_opus":0.04574332797324318,"score_gpt":0.31074261406364556,"score_spread":0.26499928609040235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338844312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97646433,0.00024872812,0.00031043563,0.010112204,0.00014210961,0.0010863454,0.000022367827,0.000018744662,0.011594749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981089,0.0008394804,0.000038074275,0.0005594124,0.00006074296,0.00000354457,0.00003103076,0.0000071876834,0.0003516118],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978785,0.0013174508,0.00021557481,0.00019086707,0.00020913378,0.00018847955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982514,0.0010668217,0.0002197344,0.00030348115,0.00010281587,0.000055784472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002550421,0.00011924917,0.00021540694,0.000060525457,0.0019184032,0.0005058588,0.0013443606,0.00007332858,0.000011431087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034133383,0.00008002713,0.000056325014,0.0002722751,0.001208518,0.0007204222,0.0007355381,0.0003485452,7.719722e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037102075,0.0012009776,0.07057001,0.00016517792,0.00046329442,0.00034581765,0.6125389,0.0034896755,0.00010426463,0.28013417,0.0050779576,0.022199564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007277488,0.00021449725,0.7171949,0.00020870274,0.0001624531,0.00005955191,0.024921117,0.002177986,0.00004265048,0.0012572096,0.24615979,0.00032361096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.484771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33867475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6466249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015465776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066251174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W383050908","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation: A Constitutional Analysis, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 1 (2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.022336684305534434,"score_gpt":0.26828515493679234,"score_spread":0.2459484706312579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W383050908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13330035,0.00019858363,0.013430473,0.0047622733,0.0010881401,0.0009963785,0.00011876774,0.00012147948,0.84598356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807238,0.00011722583,0.0005298939,0.00032018346,0.00023244364,0.0000012976487,0.00007437435,0.000007791782,0.017993012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974767,0.00029780032,0.00034317526,0.000576264,0.00090010255,0.00040593807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978783,0.00019009071,0.00051849865,0.00066641206,0.00042267801,0.00032400794],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006298392,0.00020996272,0.000562434,0.00012961679,0.0030932555,0.00044940284,0.003182322,0.0002210779,0.001072687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052991494,0.00022129127,0.00022093454,0.00069337187,0.0110386005,0.0020883307,0.0011661072,0.00020594265,0.000024814144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000559436,0.000103349106,0.060660858,0.000018950312,0.0004793375,0.000052272775,0.001387868,0.00031834576,0.00014669192,0.9106334,0.025935624,0.00020735066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084131863,0.000026847363,0.023426963,0.00003180452,0.00043091972,0.0000070600026,0.00040690688,0.00036050213,0.00030705036,0.0015218982,0.9722069,0.0004318097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82968855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86378515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000685727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026727498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570088871","doi":"","title":"Paying it Forward: The Case for a Specific Statutory Limitation on Exclusive Rights for User-Generated Content Under Copyright Law, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 240 (2011)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Content (measure theory); Law; Copyright law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.1402587078487118,"score_gpt":0.26770156305193943,"score_spread":0.12744285520322762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570088871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73704624,0.00026375044,0.0060568657,0.0028951496,0.0018197454,0.008653289,0.00010077341,0.00019843123,0.24296574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799052,0.000032341286,0.00064167933,0.0018598,0.0003536858,0.000040389048,0.00014806452,0.000052657655,0.016966213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792314,0.000083444764,0.0004958651,0.0007908361,0.00026143718,0.0004452576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972786,0.0003053956,0.00071708683,0.0006722139,0.00096436543,0.000062354],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045866752,0.00038725842,0.00051893445,0.00014633674,0.0034565292,0.0009816693,0.001839851,0.00017335858,0.0016956986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031117575,0.0002757602,0.00030750415,0.00024137739,0.0005581941,0.003554956,0.0011824218,0.00022395859,0.000116901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009104525,0.0012484983,0.0003501022,0.00083954347,0.0008040187,0.0006516229,0.0050617014,0.00009546608,0.006415734,0.44416475,0.53024065,0.0010233691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003955078,0.00034051525,0.00041527385,0.0002550612,0.0005298875,0.00007331026,0.004005955,0.011826719,0.019351682,0.008333268,0.949904,0.0010092198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017640183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015974442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4358315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021506696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069337795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W598803545","doi":"","title":"The Case for a U.S. Privacy Commissioner: A Canadian Commissioner’s Perspective, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2000)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03197506263777512,"score_gpt":0.31079550972087383,"score_spread":0.2788204470830987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W598803545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18466158,0.0010648727,0.000098328426,0.022128284,0.0006805743,0.0026640447,0.00012587415,0.000109073466,0.78846735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95469165,0.0002593726,0.00036275334,0.0005839982,0.00030937,0.000006588356,0.000011479812,0.000020326921,0.043754432],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979093,0.00036648562,0.0003137709,0.00048167785,0.00038291462,0.00054583437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975237,0.0003449554,0.00029424872,0.0005466585,0.00052173913,0.0007686964],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007283929,0.0002110793,0.00040130483,0.00006679005,0.010693022,0.0010181854,0.003145395,0.00022964443,0.0009807188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068859044,0.00018321729,0.00018479992,0.0004375881,0.00091438787,0.0014820079,0.00072364823,0.00024423847,0.000026934451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017157636,0.0006911132,0.007645085,0.00030208172,0.00075808854,0.003510129,0.13787773,0.00040285962,0.00015018917,0.39284295,0.42097145,0.033132527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008039949,0.00006809082,0.0008265604,0.00007651426,0.000056304558,0.00009159655,0.0058393115,0.0002463281,0.000036724898,0.0014738755,0.9901835,0.000297222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.963221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87015915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7700301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011658918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017261645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W618962613","doi":"","title":"Retirement in a Defined Contribution Era: Making the Money Last, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1091 (2008)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Poverty; Social security; Annuity; Poverty rate; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Economics; Poor people; Poverty level; Demography; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Finance; Life annuity","score_opus":0.027937586604483387,"score_gpt":0.24688018648797563,"score_spread":0.21894259988349224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W618962613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651605,0.0002862541,0.000051005547,0.001165693,0.000294268,0.0009603672,0.00001045658,0.00006715036,0.03200434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965024,0.00011941345,0.00021962299,0.0008869544,0.00022666191,0.00000559859,0.00011848026,0.000026944723,0.0018939279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749935,0.00011097583,0.00056871603,0.0006841561,0.00067881023,0.00045798876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976826,0.000090405134,0.0009064184,0.0007642331,0.0005230445,0.000033307628],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065385323,0.00031718376,0.0006117253,0.0002436714,0.0017314792,0.00044794122,0.0023472058,0.00016584258,0.0005641708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009614367,0.00029626623,0.00024779647,0.0012007767,0.00036320003,0.0033895564,0.0029655807,0.00031546227,0.00010518362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064981915,0.0003575802,0.9479402,0.00016057717,0.00009513818,0.00043836774,0.00043938519,0.0003535846,0.0015345713,0.027832054,0.020027326,0.00017144576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031851383,0.00004248686,0.8695711,0.0005066028,0.0003860162,0.000024863928,0.0002876098,0.004679732,0.00059514825,0.0009224862,0.11898059,0.000818222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0206583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01284818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09895326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035248123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008120886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W659492332","doi":"","title":"Regulating Online Behavioral Advertising, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 899 (2011)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Psychology; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.07502167232764793,"score_gpt":0.2788031705706153,"score_spread":0.20378149824296737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W659492332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82724196,0.000115911054,0.00010851867,0.000564511,0.00070628914,0.00048288546,0.000015641917,0.00016158694,0.17060271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887702,0.00004030395,0.0017968002,0.0007669704,0.00040822852,0.000001451952,0.00012160536,0.000057270983,0.008037168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977382,0.000050420967,0.00047865193,0.00075154996,0.0005115246,0.00046966842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975665,0.00003747407,0.00090026564,0.00090179243,0.00052824226,0.000065675296],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003961247,0.0003565699,0.00058059697,0.00016114184,0.0013769015,0.0005513496,0.0031737261,0.00033031072,0.0020140072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018622764,0.0003901848,0.00022057472,0.0004373416,0.0005410665,0.0066788783,0.004735752,0.00041595663,0.00013385134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043022293,0.0066155926,0.53798336,0.0035673801,0.00096023205,0.0023950147,0.004648754,0.00031413796,0.023134168,0.34759688,0.048263032,0.0202192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007565077,0.00018426997,0.62804943,0.0015985656,0.0018823054,0.0001242857,0.0028457795,0.0037164306,0.006876453,0.009267965,0.33408237,0.0038070886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07349839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011169802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3383289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012762313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000791611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983014096","doi":"","title":"Lessons for the Hague: Internet Jurisdiction in Contract and Tort Cases in the European Community and the United States, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; The Internet; Personal jurisdiction; Lawsuit; European union; Enforcement; Doctrine","score_opus":0.06902041929019843,"score_gpt":0.26005334088924253,"score_spread":0.19103292159904411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983014096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96393585,0.0006797619,0.00043031474,0.0027958367,0.00034466485,0.0007973082,0.0002025759,0.000010215783,0.030803464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957338,0.0007919204,0.00007652972,0.00045099863,0.000024229897,0.0000035106414,0.000045722823,0.0000072736707,0.00286603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990356,0.00018926342,0.00030625888,0.00026272854,0.000038242055,0.00016792289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986888,0.0005333625,0.00031808153,0.00038742044,0.0000373961,0.000034927252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956736,0.0001230046,0.00031272272,0.00009016783,0.00082224904,0.00040352577,0.0012060144,0.000046391648,0.000046232282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029139721,0.00009086255,0.00006129266,0.00017756753,0.00076823233,0.00057206186,0.0011462175,0.00023353701,0.000020368196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024778654,0.0011896173,0.18316145,0.0002709993,0.0011378089,0.00015373257,0.17281769,0.013701482,0.000011723659,0.554844,0.06715411,0.003079522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009549039,0.00011306321,0.62567604,0.00011989789,0.00008400651,0.00006654246,0.009774775,0.005226708,0.000013079835,0.0039820084,0.3449547,0.0004401703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10974299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03565257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.550862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012921693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014472862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98194426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999366961","doi":"","title":"Copyright & Privacy - Through the Copyright Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 212 (2005)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Information privacy; Copyright law; Legal aspects of computing; Privacy policy; Privacy laws of the United States","score_opus":0.05381275699792375,"score_gpt":0.26480903499634495,"score_spread":0.2109962779984212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999366961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12575969,0.00088546216,0.00049031584,0.0105877025,0.0008888252,0.0017344973,0.0000141260925,0.0002309073,0.85940844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9140837,0.00039198264,0.0008420986,0.00348861,0.0011669915,0.0000063507687,0.00008741881,0.00006645591,0.07986639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996954,0.00010763908,0.0006082209,0.00094983453,0.0006901217,0.0006901373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970434,0.00014801946,0.0007856497,0.001413501,0.0005468094,0.000062625615],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052147656,0.0005019815,0.0006926778,0.00012881386,0.0024580862,0.0016291967,0.006020624,0.0002579426,0.019123962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007577896,0.00035938402,0.00033364436,0.00065575464,0.00092214387,0.011209056,0.0058518206,0.0005721077,0.0017693749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094545545,0.00051360694,0.00095846003,0.0002671686,0.0003015901,0.000057815607,0.0016683921,0.000048906513,0.002387495,0.018835075,0.9722471,0.0017689267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009961859,0.000027396394,0.00073172513,0.00016294193,0.00020645109,0.000024819008,0.00019458575,0.0021607224,0.002943009,0.0011306024,0.9908215,0.00060010015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015761867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078506805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.788324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031903517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121890705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001704711","doi":"","title":"The Law School Curriculum and the Movement for Black Lives, 31 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 27 (2020)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; York University; University of Oregon; University of North Texas; Pennsylvania State University; Georgetown University; University of Cincinnati; University of Connecticut; Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University; Washburn University; Creighton University; University of Minnesota; Emory University; University of Pennsylvania; George Washington University; Concordia University; Yale University","keywords":"Curriculum; Movement (music); White (mutation); Curriculum development; Work (physics); White supremacy","score_opus":0.02579984262376814,"score_gpt":0.31092738901980077,"score_spread":0.2851275463960326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001704711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42841256,0.0015808819,0.00015571885,0.1022076,0.0017667281,0.0046174936,0.000042631666,0.00010980512,0.46110657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718585,0.00084109674,0.000584391,0.0020407191,0.00051641423,0.000009576438,0.000016269632,0.000016748214,0.024116304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980105,0.00040570422,0.00026245188,0.0004845947,0.0004948532,0.00034186992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807936,0.00041246228,0.00040460375,0.00049875485,0.00030234468,0.0003024554],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082381896,0.00017284128,0.00030622238,0.0000150310925,0.004205358,0.0011923203,0.003265177,0.00011582758,0.00018078314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002040701,0.0001303581,0.00014786902,0.0003188445,0.002671621,0.0016277841,0.0017843625,0.00025053573,0.00004394107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060732506,0.00021245133,0.005584052,0.00011242318,0.00032973895,0.000012458085,0.08079295,0.00007726463,0.0004950711,0.7912441,0.12008817,0.00044401063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014132207,0.000052407297,0.0012440574,0.000038785125,0.00014680135,0.0000014661181,0.024709279,0.00026507152,0.0003733204,0.0040560924,0.9674277,0.00027181534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067548916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028430276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8473395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002807795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028721747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027194943","doi":"","title":"The Case for a U.S. Privacy Commissioner: A Canadian Commissioner’s Perspective, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2000)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information privacy; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Consumer privacy; The Internet; FTC Fair Information Practice; Privacy policy; Legal aspects of computing; Personally identifiable information; Privacy law","score_opus":0.04078997455384497,"score_gpt":0.31587065719587776,"score_spread":0.2750806826420328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027194943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41119546,0.0012770169,0.0010713988,0.053146526,0.0014751233,0.0062906034,0.00062228943,0.0002900165,0.52463156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557038,0.000796077,0.00298625,0.0009276638,0.00042422305,0.000015930784,0.00009892731,0.000035012978,0.03901212],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976623,0.0005368851,0.00029388326,0.00056487095,0.00038262585,0.0005594483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716425,0.00032643453,0.00027577078,0.0010427968,0.00041027422,0.00078044896],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089639035,0.00022720864,0.00034907475,0.00009583082,0.01108984,0.0009760222,0.0045484975,0.0002668035,0.0012615884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015179541,0.00021070104,0.0001883194,0.0004292573,0.0009601125,0.00187443,0.0017931353,0.0003345403,0.000044852426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025081658,0.0009493139,0.0050606304,0.0002040355,0.0006629938,0.001673385,0.114383146,0.00023052124,0.00023863155,0.16651207,0.6668258,0.04075131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009781307,0.000057499736,0.0011478711,0.000045172972,0.00005952785,0.00012789364,0.0031856874,0.00034602016,0.000041012216,0.0033612996,0.9903293,0.00032053338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91059095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8608338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54450834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014466959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012265212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034532640","doi":"","title":"The (Unnoticed) Revitalization of the Doctrine of Equivalents, 95 St. John's L. Rev. 65 (2021)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.011985995570025332,"score_gpt":0.2212847713366331,"score_spread":0.20929877576660777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034532640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.909613,0.0014182808,0.00007806259,0.00028367652,0.00038359093,0.00026961503,0.000044616336,0.000018470728,0.0878907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99329114,0.0015682529,0.000099281635,0.000019032515,0.00003284958,7.239924e-7,0.0000376094,0.0000109878,0.004940131],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910843,0.0000854933,0.0002567894,0.00021220156,0.00019510224,0.00014197394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989083,0.00007965416,0.00024113311,0.00065432774,0.0000706691,0.00004594282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015305716,0.0001256135,0.00026152446,0.000010371737,0.0003334581,0.0000319645,0.0014042992,0.0001212138,0.00039016284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022479862,0.00010222285,0.00013035897,0.00022098878,0.0003687565,0.0003076795,0.0018394709,0.00015107078,0.000002401249],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005620517,0.0005495688,0.20622493,0.0028382496,0.0015240847,0.00014493603,0.000830789,0.012106154,0.73988867,0.016220197,0.015024681,0.0040857084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014604343,0.000057427096,0.12111707,0.00039945694,0.00034132626,0.00005191171,0.00061400357,0.0013608228,0.75751513,0.00035103684,0.116250314,0.0004810497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040286343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042175094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10122564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009163879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000313291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42720094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042878932","doi":"","title":"The Regulation of New Media Broadcasting in Canada Post-iCraveTV.com, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 331 (2001)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Broadcasting (networking); Retransmission; Negotiation; New media; Public broadcasting; State (computer science); Audience measurement; Commercial broadcasting","score_opus":0.04167016127177006,"score_gpt":0.23016245411626465,"score_spread":0.1884922928444946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042878932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85792285,0.00013696712,0.00020438239,0.0020354579,0.00064063753,0.0005200107,0.000004594765,0.00002896115,0.13850613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906135,0.00007138097,0.0002171027,0.00062056165,0.00028136664,5.166774e-7,0.00005257926,0.000017789867,0.008125192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838585,0.000047610534,0.00043060028,0.00036493337,0.00043545608,0.00033556364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982988,0.00021472956,0.00056561356,0.00047781502,0.0003856571,0.00005734911],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003254002,0.00020486845,0.0003666072,0.00011643568,0.00070438214,0.00040912183,0.0020579116,0.00008981038,0.0018193618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081847575,0.00017070789,0.00009157285,0.0005845372,0.00017579847,0.0024230191,0.0021557957,0.00020774733,0.000027577364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034404441,0.00036130392,0.17624277,0.0004652518,0.00043373485,0.00023035258,0.0031063445,0.0024327885,0.008222391,0.0063126036,0.75002426,0.048727777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019860486,0.000029965446,0.25110015,0.00026138895,0.00010428623,0.000027097387,0.0006998102,0.035459366,0.0005234144,0.00069197913,0.7084983,0.00061821955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96626323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9643341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13269064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039552266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046529633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7047901329","doi":"","title":"Interpretation & The Internet, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Superconducting and THz Device Technology","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Guard (computer science); The Internet; Extant taxon; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02424973895396198,"score_gpt":0.26655195733291465,"score_spread":0.24230221837895266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7047901329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9610613,0.000017085997,0.0034012364,0.00080436066,0.0011884293,0.00033817173,0.000014734384,0.00007538129,0.033099297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98890495,0.0000036509123,0.0020883689,0.0001527633,0.0002451077,0.0000026208063,0.00006960211,0.000019207924,0.008513734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987251,0.00011005853,0.0002631013,0.0004566096,0.00019081062,0.0002542795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834937,0.00014620274,0.0003226346,0.00090386695,0.0001839334,0.00009399158],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024633683,0.00021486238,0.00033043773,0.00006852164,0.0005522127,0.00032099243,0.0029586412,0.00016058316,0.0015229178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075849393,0.00018907223,0.0001750896,0.00020044923,0.000534621,0.001115543,0.0025921746,0.0006384328,0.00019029173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038180058,0.0011617058,0.64855516,0.00016080031,0.001974349,0.00004460016,0.02332148,0.0003146413,0.05990447,0.17910628,0.048445337,0.036629375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004259201,0.00021067541,0.05861657,0.0003148687,0.0005914977,0.00016527118,0.0066158273,0.0036653003,0.029742537,0.008198212,0.88564295,0.0019770646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030855969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01138814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83719766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048135673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005743388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7048758687","doi":"","title":"Low-Income Litigants in the Sandbox: Court Record Data and the Legal Technology A2J Market","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Debt; Settlement (finance); Consumer debt; Summons; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Class action","score_opus":0.022722391012818945,"score_gpt":0.288732309599187,"score_spread":0.2660099185863681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7048758687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7875025,0.000038608967,0.000023997454,0.012526535,0.00010538322,0.00091235957,0.00008463308,0.000023202809,0.19878277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98237425,0.00009716258,0.0000537589,0.0000726921,0.00004958254,0.0000064249057,0.00004937171,0.000008594801,0.017288134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983958,0.00028706202,0.00022943805,0.0004594121,0.0003488164,0.00027946683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806494,0.00037275793,0.00017987996,0.0012456408,0.00007623128,0.000060549835],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009585194,0.00014129686,0.00030179252,0.000111625326,0.00071101286,0.00035052115,0.0052015483,0.00006869815,0.007975587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017300075,0.00010208324,0.000051774594,0.00068137125,0.00080655655,0.0003216836,0.007992065,0.00033429704,0.000020756082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027769606,0.0008699598,0.42422795,0.00033067164,0.0007149518,0.0007813003,0.0036076242,0.000023950259,0.0032258444,0.14420292,0.25754768,0.1616902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010527688,0.0001715931,0.22531095,0.00033959222,0.00018428647,0.000027934595,0.016766042,0.020819493,0.0013145995,0.003882504,0.7199277,0.00072757434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023852436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037524637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46238008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014643212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001033822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99615365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7055108802","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation: A Constitutional Analysis, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 1 (2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Laser Design and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Scrutiny; The Internet; Freedom of information; Freedom of expression; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.019027919084122113,"score_gpt":0.23588805775095156,"score_spread":0.21686013866682946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7055108802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44172254,0.00024690284,0.05866607,0.0019470787,0.0005428394,0.001260699,0.00036145997,0.000369166,0.49488324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921901,0.000056837423,0.001843848,0.00013765282,0.000065703956,0.0000034369432,0.00023545856,0.000012988488,0.0054539465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986742,0.00005544089,0.0002865137,0.000381993,0.00035507482,0.00024676172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986018,0.000092944116,0.00018594603,0.0007554542,0.00017210825,0.00019172623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016412526,0.00020744331,0.0004157129,0.00011313307,0.0006641702,0.00021014239,0.0017797584,0.00013075462,0.00043317172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010826153,0.0002375057,0.00013601205,0.0005357606,0.00038754975,0.0009612125,0.00069716247,0.00018864762,0.000039971208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013159179,0.0003536975,0.08804235,0.00029676073,0.003543747,0.000087980465,0.0007325319,0.12032376,0.022673309,0.20950234,0.55350286,0.0008090885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007281059,0.000011195824,0.04127643,0.000033746826,0.0004331378,0.000020532236,0.000028902286,0.010246324,0.0031170056,0.00022667774,0.94339854,0.00047941494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28443772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33444917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5504676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003859049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048658173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9685201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W765027207","doi":"","title":"The Regulation of New Media Broadcasting in Canada Post-iCraveTV.com, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 331 (2001)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Broadcasting (networking); Political science; Computer science; Computer network","score_opus":0.048838181709773436,"score_gpt":0.29530497845599313,"score_spread":0.24646679674621969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W765027207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8764304,0.0001948955,0.000073922085,0.003484416,0.00044988593,0.000344448,0.000012230247,0.000010480734,0.11899934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99160373,0.00026594158,0.00020108573,0.00016470152,0.00011692321,5.174693e-7,0.000012174686,0.0000051886473,0.007629749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845976,0.00020470373,0.00030121068,0.0002442796,0.0005420863,0.00024793576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983809,0.0004920468,0.00040531164,0.00021746052,0.00037538988,0.00012887182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003532474,0.000117318574,0.00027981226,0.00004505265,0.0011592117,0.00013404747,0.001683633,0.00005496085,0.00028140948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006201656,0.0001101258,0.00006785618,0.00032021376,0.00038479042,0.00087136426,0.0010519845,0.00012682196,0.000003371607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014592129,0.00029062133,0.60332286,0.00006262038,0.0006386665,0.00020040115,0.04530905,0.0034730842,0.002027928,0.21363081,0.11079251,0.01879223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000841137,0.000043123026,0.6313434,0.000102593185,0.00003142189,0.0000067428714,0.0050432147,0.0011261207,0.00033958003,0.00072864984,0.36014423,0.00024974224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98697156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99505734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24935171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007931728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001158947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8915836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W765900239","doi":"","title":"Does the Establishment Clause Matter? Non-Establishment Principles in the United States and Canada, 4 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 451 (2002)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02390779965627653,"score_gpt":0.2591866654505635,"score_spread":0.23527886579428697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W765900239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7681032,0.00008590103,0.00000969085,0.012980511,0.0002287552,0.0006141759,0.00010328465,0.000011540128,0.21786296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848936,0.0006109406,0.00006127765,0.0028015033,0.00005671998,0.0000034804186,0.000022843375,0.0000062639438,0.011543331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980833,0.00042596675,0.0002389263,0.0003171945,0.00057018094,0.00036445932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852425,0.000490762,0.0002677746,0.00040177655,0.00015741774,0.00015800126],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045714382,0.00016032676,0.00024785832,0.00005176212,0.0022668166,0.00055302616,0.00212344,0.000075664175,0.0007198926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002547895,0.00009985056,0.000045812885,0.0003669208,0.002451532,0.00081005006,0.00084445777,0.00022109154,0.0000059754093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011193028,0.00039100513,0.4259285,0.000080652084,0.00019649266,0.00037436967,0.021979265,0.00083335675,0.000038740713,0.46286392,0.08697196,0.00022978589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042636375,0.000023603909,0.050134115,0.0000518864,0.000057414785,0.000010345065,0.017414065,0.00016169155,0.00006593185,0.00009537916,0.93132937,0.00022984622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96995765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93180376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8443574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004072817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065382646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W811677781","doi":"","title":"When Contract Negotiations No Longer Protect Your Business Interests: The Strange World of Third Party Business Interests Under Freedom of Information Legislation, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 455 (2009)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Legislation; Political science; Law and economics; Business information; Business; Law; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.034104707878309104,"score_gpt":0.25172112104419114,"score_spread":0.21761641316588204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W811677781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8164236,0.0002469637,0.035287134,0.018394213,0.002790562,0.0048149247,0.00012658838,0.00034624874,0.121569775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682796,0.000031598902,0.000771257,0.0011137131,0.00038611927,0.000003567481,0.00013411524,0.000023976238,0.00070767436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977669,0.00008344367,0.00084840937,0.00036987604,0.0006033955,0.000327959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940439,0.00014206668,0.0018299372,0.0007877375,0.0031560906,0.00004025292],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005512419,0.0003541673,0.0006552899,0.00031628282,0.000672945,0.00083144766,0.0024806373,0.0002458107,0.0003348335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008315536,0.00030484196,0.00017561122,0.0012794762,0.00057776505,0.0114395395,0.0013232626,0.00039814573,0.00004269193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009462173,0.0048934324,0.15072627,0.007466723,0.0027738565,0.00015540468,0.013249578,0.079468675,0.00744834,0.59228855,0.10941818,0.022648819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003123496,0.000054308697,0.9202805,0.0010774278,0.00041601696,0.000013371217,0.0003886787,0.0092234835,0.0002855818,0.0030281127,0.061364662,0.0007443303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027298855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015537504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76955426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011093945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017430067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W824533568","doi":"","title":"Interpretation & The Internet, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); The Internet; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.022178969518380547,"score_gpt":0.282027364190812,"score_spread":0.2598483946724314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W824533568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6096984,0.000079781785,0.000735772,0.0026658315,0.0026895301,0.00074758177,0.000008610394,0.000076324635,0.38329816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834388,0.000042687396,0.00023825438,0.0003670147,0.000510273,0.0000017710686,0.0000071440422,0.000011728147,0.015382366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837697,0.00024755145,0.00026842812,0.00037784735,0.0004592359,0.00026995377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984662,0.00018333585,0.0004399274,0.0004206082,0.0003324911,0.0001574165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065417605,0.00015435889,0.00029924794,0.000046389363,0.0015710513,0.0008441785,0.0035753949,0.0002052599,0.0006124334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004116127,0.00013275983,0.00013544271,0.0002876347,0.0010001237,0.0023353652,0.00177763,0.000382334,0.00006537507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00142755,0.0009263247,0.09676708,0.00043352225,0.00096079154,0.00027482116,0.2149981,0.00020210624,0.01090728,0.50141865,0.14061914,0.03106463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010268148,0.00013307056,0.041990712,0.00020491522,0.00013715746,0.00002261297,0.0038129713,0.0012687341,0.0023972848,0.002240815,0.9461355,0.0006293823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21205957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16686419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80551636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012819777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020627072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W890600056","doi":"","title":"Copyright & Privacy - Through the Copyright Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 212 (2005)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Internet privacy; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.04406353582006987,"score_gpt":0.2561642523602597,"score_spread":0.21210071654018983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W890600056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104072966,0.0009488792,0.00031942019,0.01054265,0.0008523809,0.0016928272,0.000012327313,0.0002172782,0.8813413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94014573,0.000359218,0.00053234847,0.0034576452,0.0011000203,0.0000058031924,0.000058287245,0.000060471575,0.054280486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704397,0.00010035885,0.0005895823,0.0009227601,0.00066942646,0.00067390676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972251,0.0001386975,0.00076315994,0.001293548,0.0005202606,0.000059253784],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049323007,0.0004858276,0.0006757373,0.00012171504,0.0024102943,0.0015821961,0.0060377154,0.0002456744,0.016572967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006309201,0.00034613162,0.00032387118,0.0006350402,0.00090547866,0.011714016,0.005791302,0.00054915703,0.0012317796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010424082,0.0005672123,0.0009935342,0.00028938058,0.00033308362,0.00009921686,0.0016932626,0.000050431056,0.0024465376,0.026458995,0.9634094,0.0026165165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001036571,0.00003692981,0.0008775709,0.00016455048,0.00020993261,0.000024124312,0.0002715775,0.0041946108,0.0048626442,0.0011238889,0.9866091,0.00058852124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014700515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042593973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83607274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030980824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012146638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}