{"meta":{"query_hash":"e5a8718c6e23","filters":{"venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e5a8718c6e23","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=UIC+Law+Open+Access+Repository+%28University+of+Illinois+at+Chicago%29"},"results":[{"id":"W2528229018","doi":"","title":"Town of Greece and City of Saguenay: Non-Establishment Principles with or without an Establishment Clause, 14 First Amend. L. Rev. 343 (2016)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04888247021302318,"score_gpt":0.2601085662785723,"score_spread":0.21122609606554915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528229018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06905967,0.010919183,0.0020533556,0.040245313,0.00091184647,0.00013915612,0.0012388251,0.00009788223,0.8753348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80653775,0.0031724134,0.0018642035,0.020108256,0.00033417653,0.00032844607,0.00045111703,0.00007579849,0.1671278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829394,0.00042429203,0.000117119554,0.00033293536,0.00029690523,0.0005348016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923205,0.000286381,0.0001013387,0.00013981902,0.00015291316,0.000087470304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012984155,0.00046367262,0.00044744616,0.000598373,0.006758164,0.006719376,0.0015398712,0.007779413,0.008078745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032913352,0.00060607167,0.00077312184,0.0010060889,0.00618014,0.0029231494,0.005069581,0.003942526,0.0011772487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041722236,0.000024322724,0.0020069263,0.00018396888,0.000022414282,0.0013800166,0.004948328,0.00031846794,0.00035292574,0.941083,0.042097505,0.0075404397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119658886,0.00006248085,0.030122723,0.0007740855,0.00009794676,0.0013433931,0.015751047,0.00035928734,0.0013519638,0.10361781,0.84630173,0.0000978088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11880273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22930144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8811973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045814277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011846036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23622245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338844312","doi":"","title":"Lessons for the Hague: Internet Jurisdiction in Contract and Tort Cases in the European Community and the United States, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tort; Political science; Law; The Internet; Conflict of laws; Computer science; Liability","score_opus":0.04574332797324318,"score_gpt":0.31074261406364556,"score_spread":0.26499928609040235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338844312","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056030408,0.087658316,0.0027099894,0.508396,0.0031486086,0.00012158773,0.00024044153,0.000051056926,0.34164363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7821484,0.026154181,0.0024234494,0.15216778,0.0018382502,0.0003386111,0.0002030368,0.00006120994,0.034665197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844698,0.0071192966,0.0006894974,0.0012148435,0.0028907852,0.0036158583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573583,0.035609376,0.0012110597,0.00079498865,0.0031664309,0.0018598383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026698204,0.000808173,0.0011402463,0.0063494695,0.0277257,0.034408487,0.0064121303,0.050996546,0.0077336207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05072854,0.0010519841,0.0016679134,0.007104571,0.038743492,0.039916065,0.012859902,0.016673043,0.00073980907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036903642,0.00009108887,0.0020847577,0.00008087145,0.00001654016,0.0007831071,0.013470719,0.00031996294,0.00002136432,0.9014597,0.06771016,0.013924879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016786526,0.00006916621,0.007561794,0.002963949,0.00011042078,0.00065022043,0.115096085,0.0015170766,0.00021857479,0.5928442,0.278586,0.00021475527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33723614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4479377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33723614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023963695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040779214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6705464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W383050908","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation: A Constitutional Analysis, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 1 (2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.022336684305534434,"score_gpt":0.26828515493679234,"score_spread":0.2459484706312579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W383050908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063627146,0.008013085,0.001982854,0.1562399,0.0007131833,0.00027664963,0.003197755,0.00015385554,0.7657955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7454243,0.0058860197,0.0024820366,0.06947547,0.0003681981,0.0003492365,0.0007952381,0.0000989979,0.17512047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98716563,0.0008965271,0.00024854284,0.00083064585,0.005926544,0.004932009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922168,0.0026845182,0.00027485113,0.00034785716,0.0034207292,0.0010551404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005457245,0.00066428457,0.000587176,0.0034965968,0.033971176,0.015302517,0.0029682203,0.011394127,0.009667403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014347336,0.0009626866,0.0010101445,0.003790973,0.011446583,0.0027355237,0.0029082529,0.007555017,0.0007770945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027508873,0.00004276681,0.0024436237,0.00006568809,0.000017585055,0.00029457474,0.004012133,0.00031833025,0.0002248924,0.88431627,0.101059176,0.007177482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013812726,0.000060193885,0.029192153,0.0008557557,0.00027062473,0.0002428059,0.0106989015,0.002184128,0.0016150137,0.08007865,0.8743765,0.0002871413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98978347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99328196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11143375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11143375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24650243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8085122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570088871","doi":"","title":"Paying it Forward: The Case for a Specific Statutory Limitation on Exclusive Rights for User-Generated Content Under Copyright Law, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 240 (2011)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Content (measure theory); Law; Copyright law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.1402587078487118,"score_gpt":0.26770156305193943,"score_spread":0.12744285520322762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570088871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07784017,0.0061921054,0.02352219,0.16903208,0.00079264643,0.0001829867,0.0002554234,0.00021265043,0.7219697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875736,0.0019620259,0.0063404012,0.036141235,0.0008487765,0.00029161922,0.000081628095,0.00009688484,0.06666379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867591,0.004707808,0.00068732107,0.0016672215,0.0039937547,0.0021847081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819051,0.011696383,0.0009943623,0.0022456092,0.0024672223,0.0006912874],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150523605,0.0004888232,0.00046931815,0.0014023461,0.010199644,0.016146509,0.0031925438,0.020317787,0.0043491786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029019002,0.0007246835,0.00081772194,0.0012501113,0.03005164,0.014102585,0.005949374,0.010281176,0.0009601516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006082933,0.000011935295,0.00031766735,0.00001269004,0.000002836001,0.00011891969,0.0018941083,0.00008986688,0.00007599936,0.9901361,0.005381746,0.0019520067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053683543,0.00003927639,0.0016902316,0.00043555448,0.000052632906,0.00035369865,0.0035544753,0.0019812589,0.0013738811,0.81216127,0.17822094,0.00008314542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04162532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053942163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009557639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01756954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082766056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W598803545","doi":"","title":"The Case for a U.S. Privacy Commissioner: A Canadian Commissioner’s Perspective, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2000)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03197506263777512,"score_gpt":0.31079550972087383,"score_spread":0.2788204470830987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W598803545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005346506,0.01615485,0.0018694992,0.7560938,0.0015384688,0.000072044655,0.0002561728,0.000045237026,0.21862341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3470063,0.01494578,0.004303984,0.5153583,0.0013530939,0.0001878643,0.00018083936,0.00016131207,0.11650248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657737,0.0067326506,0.00082105974,0.0031022425,0.010201194,0.013369218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97512674,0.009810413,0.00091588806,0.00087828963,0.009028266,0.0042404756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023402274,0.00094860006,0.0010310659,0.004579682,0.059460185,0.0366669,0.0059388787,0.051273882,0.010806382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05037514,0.0014864207,0.0018543678,0.006498741,0.0424012,0.01541766,0.0065353904,0.026817475,0.0013362156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012312655,0.000020834901,0.00064953585,0.000035152945,0.000010167239,0.00017708128,0.0038182642,0.00016484049,0.000049458282,0.85384417,0.13711679,0.0041013644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008343759,0.000026373298,0.0048112487,0.0010062905,0.00009706651,0.00032216765,0.014512474,0.0017010566,0.00034057227,0.22478378,0.7520403,0.00027525373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9768901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14663474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14663474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2713283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98978275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W618962613","doi":"","title":"Retirement in a Defined Contribution Era: Making the Money Last, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1091 (2008)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Poverty; Social security; Annuity; Poverty rate; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Economics; Poor people; Poverty level; Demography; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Finance; Life annuity","score_opus":0.027937586604483387,"score_gpt":0.24688018648797563,"score_spread":0.21894259988349224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W618962613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024832608,0.022096924,0.001164928,0.5638226,0.0019524471,0.000043951346,0.00081702665,0.00016353282,0.385106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40371323,0.011763217,0.0011339462,0.23496448,0.0029923578,0.0003296436,0.00038721494,0.00011712851,0.34459877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732035,0.0009079019,0.00008617335,0.0002390597,0.0005672226,0.0008793169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833435,0.000643825,0.00013553901,0.00010898981,0.00034127416,0.00043600806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038108046,0.0005425225,0.00027724824,0.0006812756,0.01251,0.007212403,0.0015527243,0.00978815,0.014194095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008510736,0.0004376912,0.00050240254,0.00064323365,0.0033722762,0.0058475873,0.0051342524,0.0061838725,0.003642588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051928262,0.00007405835,0.0028323238,0.00005531157,0.000011434224,0.0003284009,0.0039568907,0.00008240174,0.00010856003,0.36196503,0.6131614,0.017372297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046152792,0.000038523693,0.007930962,0.0005241813,0.000032168722,0.00011850437,0.004759619,0.00033227223,0.00027516615,0.046291977,0.9396075,0.00004298071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08508225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18304737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08508225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005804403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010358044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16917402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W659492332","doi":"","title":"Regulating Online Behavioral Advertising, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 899 (2011)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Psychology; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.07502167232764793,"score_gpt":0.2788031705706153,"score_spread":0.20378149824296737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W659492332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010762847,0.019524971,0.001030439,0.2599962,0.0007095445,0.00008990251,0.0005460968,0.00021635315,0.70712364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29625794,0.017851958,0.0019792216,0.28434023,0.0026344273,0.0008651083,0.00039351668,0.00015974928,0.3955178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957704,0.0012350882,0.00017298257,0.0004521103,0.0011018924,0.001267473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965109,0.0022669558,0.0002206245,0.00013634462,0.00064239174,0.00022273074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003926951,0.0011432916,0.0005061605,0.0016653381,0.01518932,0.014208433,0.0015709193,0.022446828,0.014770064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008420109,0.0011719643,0.0011042819,0.0016202843,0.006112077,0.006201595,0.0031409482,0.010656618,0.0047401534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056254226,0.00016482588,0.0033760057,0.000109663335,0.000022111097,0.0005240929,0.0027493967,0.00033630888,0.00031945657,0.61830115,0.3543778,0.019662881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010265245,0.00008528061,0.012936305,0.0014330563,0.00017170521,0.00028418386,0.004577476,0.0025069467,0.00067262497,0.13451391,0.8425574,0.00015860202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13065022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22982015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13065022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011645395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013209204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2597795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983014096","doi":"","title":"Lessons for the Hague: Internet Jurisdiction in Contract and Tort Cases in the European Community and the United States, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; The Internet; Personal jurisdiction; Lawsuit; European union; Enforcement; Doctrine","score_opus":0.06902041929019843,"score_gpt":0.26005334088924253,"score_spread":0.19103292159904411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983014096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0630357,0.06835775,0.002909119,0.5074001,0.0029480967,0.00012599897,0.000212864,0.00004978119,0.35496062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80940956,0.018915927,0.0023819138,0.1370459,0.0015679854,0.00027452628,0.00016922697,0.00005568398,0.030179275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98324513,0.0075127687,0.00069561816,0.0013654233,0.0032133202,0.0039676405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622511,0.031093787,0.0010622347,0.0007706429,0.0030423526,0.0017799463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027002817,0.00073697895,0.0010310374,0.005916328,0.027963962,0.033572916,0.0059868135,0.0470334,0.006907357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049835708,0.0009778859,0.0016289186,0.0063901064,0.04135178,0.037652776,0.012238126,0.016646203,0.0006721981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034220753,0.00007885932,0.0019304068,0.00006241404,0.000015848442,0.00065686554,0.013403009,0.00027590175,0.000023288814,0.9172617,0.0532468,0.013010622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017073599,0.000071354676,0.007651984,0.0024058206,0.00011770278,0.00065758085,0.11654002,0.00155715,0.0002603659,0.59774727,0.2726001,0.00022000053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40243065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5059905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40243065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025686491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04443053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8001765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999366961","doi":"","title":"Copyright & Privacy - Through the Copyright Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 212 (2005)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Information privacy; Copyright law; Legal aspects of computing; Privacy policy; Privacy laws of the United States","score_opus":0.05381275699792375,"score_gpt":0.26480903499634495,"score_spread":0.2109962779984212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999366961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005788549,0.04290342,0.0028980635,0.2288646,0.0008261746,0.000062310166,0.0005055455,0.00012585391,0.7180255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32170552,0.043233372,0.003468077,0.16943215,0.0032591547,0.00041396913,0.00028763132,0.00018529742,0.45801485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605584,0.0011111031,0.00015247712,0.00043344244,0.0013881803,0.0008589931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971167,0.0017829972,0.00019421721,0.00021349452,0.0005080429,0.00018462162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00451329,0.0010591364,0.00041382783,0.0016346321,0.012764336,0.017231114,0.0018698801,0.020134356,0.01642301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011230764,0.00078892685,0.00094092544,0.00235753,0.012383352,0.014031701,0.0036444385,0.009269831,0.0029882623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011042286,0.000022535589,0.0003941475,0.000052179446,0.000006725219,0.0001616161,0.0013635736,0.00012754647,0.0000895513,0.80699754,0.18276116,0.008012398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029790119,0.000027243648,0.001997422,0.00076704577,0.00004756055,0.00019449973,0.0034681181,0.0007119456,0.00052604504,0.30283356,0.68934757,0.000049224913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11447829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16695859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11447829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012666482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013088346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22762388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001704711","doi":"","title":"The Law School Curriculum and the Movement for Black Lives, 31 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 27 (2020)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; York University; University of Oregon; University of North Texas; Pennsylvania State University; Georgetown University; University of Cincinnati; University of Connecticut; Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University; Washburn University; Creighton University; University of Minnesota; Emory University; University of Pennsylvania; George Washington University; Concordia University; Yale University","keywords":"Curriculum; Movement (music); White (mutation); Curriculum development; Work (physics); White supremacy","score_opus":0.02579984262376814,"score_gpt":0.31092738901980077,"score_spread":0.2851275463960326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001704711","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023599677,0.007783697,0.00046675935,0.537152,0.0013246804,0.000043843193,0.00025152272,0.00008600198,0.4292918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4157714,0.006263225,0.0011479054,0.18001522,0.001198665,0.0002904818,0.00024683995,0.00010980536,0.39495644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978794,0.00053426705,0.00003708591,0.00015603406,0.0005522579,0.0008409154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714965,0.00058920647,0.00022515212,0.00006237777,0.00026951448,0.0017041818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030284899,0.00031933447,0.00015029659,0.00093547045,0.012476214,0.006501454,0.0007721153,0.0065306467,0.026524108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005864516,0.00041001925,0.00021315098,0.0004823941,0.006888891,0.0039340635,0.0048738774,0.004524195,0.0027156065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020717582,0.0003813702,0.0056485767,0.000070890856,0.000004233472,0.0002253979,0.009064751,0.000102976825,0.00031520255,0.48608178,0.42520976,0.07287425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034628167,0.000040024832,0.024008896,0.00044837102,0.000009071854,0.000071724615,0.008663357,0.00015578716,0.00036220567,0.037232965,0.92895085,0.000022208193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1426352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37761253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1426352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008648167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04389388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28360993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027194943","doi":"","title":"The Case for a U.S. Privacy Commissioner: A Canadian Commissioner’s Perspective, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2000)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information privacy; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Consumer privacy; The Internet; FTC Fair Information Practice; Privacy policy; Legal aspects of computing; Personally identifiable information; Privacy law","score_opus":0.04078997455384497,"score_gpt":0.31587065719587776,"score_spread":0.2750806826420328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027194943","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00461851,0.016985081,0.0017606118,0.79022634,0.0014804589,0.00006713128,0.0003412672,0.000041279964,0.18447931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2854955,0.018224332,0.004486019,0.5761014,0.0013455348,0.00021426837,0.00026287007,0.00015708744,0.11371306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651537,0.0073916037,0.00092571665,0.0032167411,0.011405818,0.011906467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97224426,0.012503497,0.0008889035,0.0011395138,0.009083044,0.0041407137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02519741,0.0009309727,0.0011060106,0.0047492054,0.050752968,0.037123606,0.005632994,0.046259806,0.010182843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050413363,0.0014913098,0.0019269006,0.008388228,0.042682767,0.017658802,0.0070775817,0.024779128,0.001236309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000161125,0.000023177718,0.00073595194,0.000042376523,0.000012298352,0.00015980368,0.004262118,0.00015896054,0.00004986056,0.8214521,0.16790694,0.005180274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074663396,0.000025339501,0.0044165426,0.0009276626,0.00008408861,0.00026792922,0.013339641,0.0013198066,0.0002893855,0.17720981,0.8018087,0.00023649134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97578293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9731996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13818847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13818847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26175365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034532640","doi":"","title":"The (Unnoticed) Revitalization of the Doctrine of Equivalents, 95 St. John's L. Rev. 65 (2021)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.011985995570025332,"score_gpt":0.2212847713366331,"score_spread":0.20929877576660777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034532640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007493453,0.007369093,0.0042364304,0.19548108,0.0019195755,0.000033390927,0.00025459775,0.00007764393,0.78313464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5414721,0.005391692,0.0043952065,0.21660607,0.003726998,0.0003733891,0.0001750749,0.00017293623,0.2276866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949203,0.0013759608,0.00018444945,0.00069672,0.0018601767,0.0009624176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508625,0.0026540817,0.00023754961,0.00059115497,0.0012207634,0.00021018532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062260316,0.0006074362,0.00047618555,0.0010033174,0.009323828,0.009123702,0.002657368,0.017904712,0.008694617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020753251,0.0007254329,0.00071141473,0.00075320277,0.017132804,0.009089627,0.004120907,0.017219892,0.0022058086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057459633,0.000004946042,0.000047719575,0.000008186624,0.0000013413378,0.000030185525,0.00036300128,0.000031032774,0.000025312685,0.9709391,0.027292807,0.0012505165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030671432,0.000015449901,0.0007710168,0.00028920328,0.000026057256,0.00013578078,0.00093927025,0.0006985021,0.00061010313,0.58599216,0.41045249,0.000039237817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04510446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06533208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04510446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007539962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010739686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08968383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042878932","doi":"","title":"The Regulation of New Media Broadcasting in Canada Post-iCraveTV.com, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 331 (2001)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Broadcasting (networking); Retransmission; Negotiation; New media; Public broadcasting; State (computer science); Audience measurement; Commercial broadcasting","score_opus":0.04167016127177006,"score_gpt":0.23016245411626465,"score_spread":0.1884922928444946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042878932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014866685,0.0082485555,0.0011638043,0.06493661,0.0008386242,0.00014894272,0.001380404,0.00034351257,0.9080728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18818535,0.0060382695,0.001790182,0.037910007,0.00035065087,0.0001859619,0.0006812058,0.00020701418,0.76465136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938744,0.00024569035,0.000114240065,0.00043005624,0.003323802,0.002011841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567384,0.0007415551,0.00018620056,0.00016034048,0.0025659578,0.00067204447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018760052,0.0006574027,0.0002842769,0.0016352923,0.020867793,0.013680461,0.0025679376,0.008152123,0.01864503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005932,0.0008346651,0.0005478447,0.0025409444,0.005793099,0.0019714714,0.002172116,0.0051785037,0.0030876745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031019754,0.000056095323,0.0028318274,0.00007574685,0.000012861604,0.0005578448,0.0039960123,0.0005119332,0.0006019203,0.4481254,0.52052563,0.022673685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024557823,0.0000143594925,0.0075511164,0.0001745823,0.000027618635,0.00008939089,0.0015901789,0.000859727,0.0005613046,0.00633635,0.9827001,0.00007074484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99539536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10676205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10676205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17708836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77461654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7047901329","doi":"","title":"Interpretation & The Internet, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Superconducting and THz Device Technology","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Guard (computer science); The Internet; Extant taxon; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02424973895396198,"score_gpt":0.26655195733291465,"score_spread":0.24230221837895266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7047901329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004140658,0.014514561,0.0015034709,0.15340424,0.00077884423,0.0000801133,0.00041917962,0.000116589064,0.8250423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18162571,0.013808137,0.0025155768,0.19720364,0.002551125,0.00059055147,0.00036052844,0.00016497531,0.6011798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962845,0.0011445404,0.00014745037,0.0004403877,0.0013040551,0.0006790298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972193,0.0017829555,0.00015941352,0.00017767149,0.00051442196,0.00014625817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003193093,0.00094103254,0.00043862453,0.001687492,0.013275056,0.014751909,0.0015627198,0.021736884,0.02103984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008695953,0.0008771811,0.0007848413,0.0016616904,0.009897872,0.008170881,0.0028890523,0.0101985615,0.0046905074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017476366,0.00002914341,0.00044478328,0.000043903496,0.0000048928146,0.00020277474,0.0014365588,0.00015620369,0.00011979409,0.7441847,0.24624133,0.0071184034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037271817,0.000025307796,0.0018169011,0.00057436374,0.000027565568,0.00015948257,0.002340121,0.0010018859,0.00036995823,0.18357222,0.81001645,0.00005839283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12907615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16619726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12907615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01371198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012293721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25664967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7048758687","doi":"","title":"Low-Income Litigants in the Sandbox: Court Record Data and the Legal Technology A2J Market","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Debt; Settlement (finance); Consumer debt; Summons; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Class action","score_opus":0.022722391012818945,"score_gpt":0.288732309599187,"score_spread":0.2660099185863681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7048758687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05530381,0.0069701723,0.0020433236,0.28052852,0.0019117525,0.0001461518,0.02578707,0.0013417937,0.6259674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51812935,0.010759503,0.004230992,0.07093519,0.004354666,0.0003829426,0.023176273,0.0014305626,0.3666005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970489,0.00070476765,0.00019566389,0.00024984134,0.0013565476,0.00044429454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742537,0.016457729,0.0024025722,0.0009711779,0.0031981473,0.0027165941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033485945,0.00017563635,0.00027237888,0.002881966,0.0054655825,0.009566314,0.0012868195,0.0029301876,0.097509764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026128378,0.00031620893,0.00030929584,0.004797812,0.0014774173,0.008435809,0.0027757923,0.0026791173,0.016531099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028277162,0.00006403946,0.009353378,0.00007139608,0.00000525552,0.00058782136,0.002942948,0.000060181585,0.00009150031,0.01629739,0.9268279,0.04366998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022500837,0.000031525135,0.054579344,0.00058455626,0.000017893168,0.0008208974,0.019312602,0.0006367836,0.00016562962,0.00943586,0.91433185,0.00006058517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055562526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1388465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097509764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023568347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042547267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3262027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7055108802","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation: A Constitutional Analysis, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 1 (2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Laser Design and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Scrutiny; The Internet; Freedom of information; Freedom of expression; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.019027919084122113,"score_gpt":0.23588805775095156,"score_spread":0.21686013866682946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7055108802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05434252,0.007997935,0.0023265241,0.14302017,0.00068995875,0.0002639949,0.0027623891,0.00019502407,0.7884016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6856531,0.0063506,0.0029572027,0.07609889,0.00035900867,0.00035741812,0.00069397513,0.00011946271,0.22741044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851489,0.0009322714,0.0002837457,0.00090590515,0.0076172804,0.0051119155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286276,0.0023670418,0.00023656538,0.00031976603,0.003398251,0.0008155487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005251015,0.00069364876,0.0005750922,0.003656091,0.033682495,0.015755763,0.0032562981,0.012252367,0.010731152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013688899,0.0011569865,0.0010345081,0.0036480715,0.010129192,0.002678032,0.0025918114,0.007560546,0.0010219496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032361673,0.000049318463,0.0023609316,0.000076731056,0.000020340647,0.0003723962,0.0036887329,0.0003950251,0.00036366074,0.860063,0.12405569,0.00852187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012362425,0.00006279825,0.025512004,0.0007804491,0.00027537346,0.00028297686,0.009603845,0.0023675903,0.002313953,0.06491921,0.8934546,0.00030349116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98869973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11163906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11163906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22317322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81000185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W765027207","doi":"","title":"The Regulation of New Media Broadcasting in Canada Post-iCraveTV.com, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 331 (2001)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Broadcasting (networking); Political science; Computer science; Computer network","score_opus":0.048838181709773436,"score_gpt":0.29530497845599313,"score_spread":0.24646679674621969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W765027207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02235877,0.011757631,0.001113096,0.08651008,0.0007777146,0.000113012335,0.0010848931,0.00020848092,0.87607634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39034232,0.009985306,0.0017567823,0.04470257,0.0004183843,0.00018685606,0.00057794625,0.00018100809,0.5518488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937981,0.00034870536,0.00011714257,0.0004454407,0.0030439594,0.002246641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534035,0.000884115,0.00024134107,0.00015912773,0.00266584,0.0007092891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022143342,0.0005346256,0.0002852793,0.0015821597,0.023737712,0.014040405,0.002406897,0.0067752167,0.014340696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062587974,0.0006602398,0.0004931075,0.0028512583,0.008000954,0.002218731,0.0024311303,0.005553682,0.0017021779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002568371,0.000048675945,0.003040195,0.00007904308,0.000013871851,0.0004585536,0.008366112,0.00043324594,0.00042509317,0.6491573,0.3172494,0.020702712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024775454,0.00001540561,0.010718783,0.0002623968,0.000037980168,0.00009968562,0.0037372056,0.00082124176,0.00055073504,0.010707386,0.972939,0.000085454405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99527705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12785965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12785965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1950548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92769104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W765900239","doi":"","title":"Does the Establishment Clause Matter? Non-Establishment Principles in the United States and Canada, 4 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 451 (2002)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02390779965627653,"score_gpt":0.2591866654505635,"score_spread":0.23527886579428697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W765900239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105576895,0.011590041,0.001702022,0.13903272,0.0004448273,0.00015952828,0.0012582346,0.00006340327,0.7401724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85721934,0.0047290595,0.0008110112,0.036454078,0.00019909248,0.000094113355,0.0002975909,0.000056481767,0.10013921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924515,0.0006457114,0.00015114296,0.00041706767,0.0019785392,0.0043560234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942965,0.0017501769,0.0003217774,0.00020033914,0.0024353177,0.0009958996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049002455,0.0003489602,0.00049680227,0.0011896199,0.027431468,0.012978991,0.0025169584,0.008073397,0.011589964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010967297,0.00066818093,0.00068207766,0.0021755323,0.012715085,0.0038922115,0.0027356579,0.0072417804,0.0009702579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003583348,0.00005982351,0.0053290604,0.00004877449,0.000014242134,0.00021265703,0.0040801344,0.0002609574,0.00017578682,0.91853046,0.06468772,0.0065646716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002166192,0.000074137824,0.10717492,0.0009901923,0.00025760673,0.00024049195,0.03593744,0.002169379,0.0017482435,0.20617169,0.6447587,0.00026059907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9793403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06680912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06680912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15361935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48473632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W811677781","doi":"","title":"When Contract Negotiations No Longer Protect Your Business Interests: The Strange World of Third Party Business Interests Under Freedom of Information Legislation, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 455 (2009)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Legislation; Political science; Law and economics; Business information; Business; Law; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.034104707878309104,"score_gpt":0.25172112104419114,"score_spread":0.21761641316588204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W811677781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019899197,0.01304214,0.008743735,0.59597737,0.001520008,0.000050271054,0.00009959109,0.00008545524,0.3605822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6746421,0.009820421,0.0045156274,0.22302572,0.0030306156,0.00030868762,0.00012851323,0.00029931616,0.084228955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96439296,0.018682357,0.0008621317,0.0031078164,0.007009085,0.0059456797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97538406,0.017544307,0.0013905087,0.0019120659,0.002020704,0.0017483401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03364307,0.0006895405,0.000816267,0.0012080629,0.03118766,0.04904376,0.0038317791,0.038917683,0.009686313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04389463,0.0010307516,0.0013641625,0.0023483548,0.04617774,0.052516267,0.013621349,0.027511282,0.0022261443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011151223,0.000013259591,0.00020919283,0.000017307164,0.000004215547,0.0001876724,0.008214484,0.000056444078,0.000040361545,0.95520985,0.03261434,0.0034218712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003478239,0.000018554714,0.00045313814,0.00041745818,0.000016942535,0.0002164869,0.0164473,0.00058190967,0.00023020769,0.7162304,0.26529214,0.000060648093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028043251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031148622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04904376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016332306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021792615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17792368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W824533568","doi":"","title":"Interpretation & The Internet, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); The Internet; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.022178969518380547,"score_gpt":0.282027364190812,"score_spread":0.2598483946724314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W824533568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006026273,0.029418577,0.002534911,0.2793654,0.0008079054,0.000067140114,0.00024908164,0.000084907064,0.6814458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47982964,0.027274407,0.004147817,0.185006,0.003201253,0.00048911304,0.00030614887,0.00019436229,0.29955137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935634,0.0029454129,0.00022166783,0.00055921177,0.0017959793,0.0009142748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547535,0.003201528,0.00022131947,0.00025004768,0.00062448677,0.00022731132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005948776,0.00073773926,0.00050040765,0.00208386,0.015335294,0.019908395,0.0016262463,0.01872737,0.014123987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013103945,0.00063179235,0.000839078,0.0018685111,0.021190364,0.011510027,0.0038857092,0.010307114,0.0024487088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008724693,0.000020159081,0.00033058668,0.00003108582,0.000005508333,0.00015343074,0.0021389488,0.00011927247,0.000045807377,0.8837431,0.10820997,0.0051934537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044014207,0.000019571162,0.0013599871,0.0007522343,0.000028722321,0.00014273256,0.005499188,0.0008635593,0.00020723861,0.509496,0.48154408,0.000042750933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08281677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11930392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08281677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015974406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017641488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16466945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W890600056","doi":"","title":"Copyright & Privacy - Through the Copyright Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 212 (2005)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Internet privacy; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.04406353582006987,"score_gpt":0.2561642523602597,"score_spread":0.21210071654018983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W890600056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008151534,0.048536066,0.0034798484,0.3082973,0.0009648568,0.00006068205,0.00043249526,0.00012498033,0.62995225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4077139,0.038687643,0.003502642,0.15816244,0.0035734458,0.00034446933,0.00022578119,0.00017518445,0.38761452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955877,0.0013946453,0.0001648869,0.00049982546,0.0014000885,0.00095281034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996415,0.0022481051,0.00021811531,0.0002690425,0.0006023589,0.00024735322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055025956,0.00092952745,0.0004469787,0.0017023156,0.012583147,0.018974327,0.0018169563,0.018800076,0.014310532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012787509,0.0007063208,0.00088156585,0.002348605,0.014663814,0.015627591,0.0039413203,0.0093732085,0.0021971036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009227299,0.000016563821,0.0003413968,0.000042684387,0.0000053843773,0.00011670347,0.0013634017,0.00009716038,0.000062650026,0.885053,0.10672116,0.00617068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028852619,0.000029744519,0.0018329795,0.00089907617,0.000051408042,0.00018019085,0.0046021026,0.0006756306,0.00053727627,0.3845487,0.60656613,0.000047950838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10245991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15550739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10245991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013959203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014842926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20372707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}