{"meta":{"query_hash":"9eaf9d826608","filters":{"venue":"Uniform Law Review"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9eaf9d826608","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Uniform+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2161256765","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unv009","title":"Iura Novit Arbiter revisited: towards a harmonized approach?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Supreme court; Duty; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Arbitration; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.05753428096148712,"score_gpt":0.26567606908966646,"score_spread":0.20814178812817935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161256765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020686154,0.00615941,0.00039365984,0.0038649645,0.00019979072,0.0006037871,0.000004082171,0.00015667528,0.9884108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07173819,0.003349726,0.0054276977,0.9096851,0.0025884027,0.00019122228,0.0010328921,0.000091384165,0.0058954037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986155,0.000013890988,0.0004444728,0.0002555791,0.00044235215,0.00022822828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902797,0.0000071409413,0.0002352633,0.0002845023,0.00040798046,0.000037162325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065524137,0.0002117215,0.00033112033,0.0000858484,0.00009347968,0.000276027,0.0003143303,0.00004863934,0.00076655956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010476212,0.00015983974,0.0001473494,0.00037424627,0.000058553323,0.0014359457,0.00011898535,0.00013923063,0.002241942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009372469,0.000060052385,0.000024606812,0.0010491259,0.000021283857,0.0000041519725,0.0000064031983,8.8151774e-7,0.000009418889,0.96149385,0.03641952,0.0009013283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049561705,0.000008275494,0.000023348213,0.00075491244,0.00007383438,0.000008185613,0.000007201258,0.000999273,0.000017844448,0.005614093,0.9917744,0.00022304346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025607794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009506552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057051857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035574358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315208986","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.619","title":"R. Brownsword /N.J. Hird /G. Howells (eds.), Good Faith in Contract - Concept and Context, Aldershot, Dartmouth - Ashgate , 1999, pp. 326.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Faith; Good faith; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01965605918304419,"score_gpt":0.2897990723030501,"score_spread":0.2701430131200059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315208986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009152128,0.4178076,0.000019309544,0.018694976,0.000119334945,0.0030474276,0.00017371797,0.00020050835,0.550785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6505436,0.33654776,0.00013397181,0.008502822,0.00014157603,0.000076460215,0.000035745306,0.000023024111,0.0039950614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981376,0.00017386349,0.0005095811,0.00036471363,0.00031345326,0.00050082174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990517,0.00014328615,0.00015087241,0.00033770426,0.000056457757,0.00025999162],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007924641,0.00021619054,0.00049919926,0.000019833966,0.0004438983,0.00013786662,0.00035946709,0.00011370288,0.0022072685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048467482,0.00018405807,0.000114405026,0.00037524436,0.0005064145,0.0004417396,0.000040582534,0.0002677696,0.00025475727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008919572,0.000101255086,0.00021363088,0.00021695979,0.000023264753,0.000011883823,0.0019101856,0.0000024311369,0.00000680765,0.6934237,0.0067583444,0.29732263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045608057,0.000029559957,0.00031396214,0.0008265171,0.000044830304,0.0000041892013,0.00019100195,0.000012948678,0.000012230688,0.00074014225,0.9971168,0.00025172674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025188033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02038102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008312551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014356045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320277435","doi":"10.1093/ulr/13.1-2.58","title":"Harmonising The Law in a Multilingual and Pluri-Juridical Environment: A Canadian Point of View (Abstract)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041327497477783984,"score_gpt":0.2905188570617818,"score_spread":0.24919135958399785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320277435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038264573,0.14025679,9.212074e-7,0.011361213,0.00007387312,0.0006635382,0.000019152742,0.000015339929,0.8093446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81145495,0.18511547,0.000060686685,0.003151666,0.00003363031,0.0000046321793,0.0000019700026,0.0000053250114,0.00017165432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991038,0.00008823238,0.0002810245,0.000118871714,0.00021833446,0.00018974877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999613,0.00008873107,0.00007379748,0.00009924132,0.000025893642,0.00009934268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007146054,0.00007960785,0.0001933162,0.00001715949,0.00041025915,0.000013285652,0.00016360235,0.000024075902,0.00017554643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009230452,0.000054946522,0.00005339876,0.00006680057,0.0008229231,0.000107422056,0.00003817075,0.00011843648,0.000032190015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020708837,0.000027442751,0.0001914605,0.00018011323,0.000014245473,0.000034851888,0.0028972393,6.23468e-7,0.0000033682547,0.9915432,0.00022418705,0.0048812428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090603775,0.000011855709,0.0011572174,0.0008974393,0.0000104543105,0.00000744353,0.00012505984,0.000002089999,0.000019869985,0.000339567,0.9972693,0.000069133705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20506564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33805317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008305776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009381403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8002279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327732972","doi":"10.1093/ulr/13.1-2.39","title":"Harmoniser le droit dans un espace multilingue et pluri-juridique : un point de vue canadien","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Ethnology; Political science; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.03511453166318413,"score_gpt":0.31209981244383667,"score_spread":0.27698528078065254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327732972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04513968,0.25975686,0.00062016747,0.08392998,0.00083820836,0.001157312,0.00016234047,0.0000922978,0.6083031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6157605,0.34670416,0.0012180968,0.008489896,0.00028730894,0.00007106362,0.000027893511,0.000030136975,0.027410937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771976,0.00042035128,0.0005108696,0.00037313259,0.00037248986,0.0006033979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986538,0.00021650172,0.00023425592,0.0002735355,0.0003354901,0.00028640698],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096187583,0.00030470683,0.0005876646,0.000030293993,0.0010814372,0.000038140435,0.00047848516,0.00010608369,0.0009873187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017519787,0.0002961239,0.00029446726,0.00036809238,0.0008347332,0.000410183,0.00013733904,0.00033516242,0.00021955048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000616815,0.00013312363,0.00027106516,0.00030604878,0.00013189693,0.00009730043,0.014451098,0.0000146850825,0.000011332511,0.9759475,0.0074000927,0.0012296607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025225294,0.00007048827,0.00076216814,0.0019798342,0.00008764014,0.00007156407,0.0007493827,0.00007522489,0.0005526145,0.006697883,0.98835224,0.00034868583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24950191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4276554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98095214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006344419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008859129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327833353","doi":"10.1093/ulr/17.4.599","title":"From Acorn to Oak Tree: the Development of the Cape Town Convention and Protocols","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Cape; Law; Political science; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04555235159467189,"score_gpt":0.3520435758984515,"score_spread":0.30649122430377956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327833353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11409935,0.010110278,0.00056700734,0.049837887,0.0012701289,0.06422409,0.00007394057,0.00008034318,0.75973696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796061,0.0012930569,0.0020249982,0.0064880946,0.00063886266,0.004372774,0.00003307375,0.000012636242,0.0055304044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993738,0.00007341004,0.00018143296,0.00005174009,0.00022565109,0.000093960436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967635,0.000038044556,0.00010137692,0.00008674771,0.00006357411,0.000033908153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078182237,0.000042465465,0.00007949968,0.0000046820073,0.0002414272,0.000017542327,0.00015725891,0.000020309575,0.00019959436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006187355,0.000021869468,0.000033408567,0.00007971496,0.00005365877,0.000121786594,0.000037968915,0.00003472098,0.000024923074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024937642,0.000025369416,0.00064782094,0.00009722143,0.000011001713,1.8106435e-8,0.0033023558,6.639931e-8,0.000064712076,0.94500285,0.0007277956,0.050118312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041560073,0.0000042707743,0.0040583555,0.00078615494,0.000010946888,1.04750434e-7,0.00010732739,6.613929e-7,0.0003837383,0.0011884937,0.99338263,0.00003572471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095083925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036430066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99265486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040407143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055451874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21854183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332475208","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.633-b","title":"Peter Kaye (ed.), European Case Law on the Judgments Convention, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester/New York/Weinheim/Brisbane/Singapore/Toronto, 1998, pp. L + 964, ISBN 0-471-94089-5.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.04607043350071265,"score_gpt":0.2981543683563499,"score_spread":0.25208393485563724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332475208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031501066,0.10514996,0.000029393845,0.010578016,0.00077311473,0.0018577009,0.00005527566,0.00032094517,0.8780855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20272285,0.66215134,0.0006206787,0.053122927,0.00401994,0.0001321582,0.0003759378,0.00025950623,0.07659465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624157,0.0008732918,0.00084499887,0.00056823035,0.00075709267,0.0007148359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810886,0.00013264827,0.00036267607,0.00088352524,0.00009568671,0.00041657413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002525666,0.00042487233,0.00053688337,0.000022192793,0.0016944899,0.00034739857,0.00060190493,0.00013755055,0.0076182703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060481376,0.00031727433,0.00041754375,0.00026073176,0.00037489002,0.0005493341,0.00007606149,0.00038729538,0.0032431649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008062584,0.00046375484,0.00009977678,0.00085934135,0.00028917685,0.00039494378,0.0076132687,0.000005334691,0.000016256216,0.3684542,0.29977664,0.3219467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003806348,0.000087377084,0.000037726943,0.0025680028,0.00020196021,0.00012924537,0.00012457673,0.0000034406662,0.000008632019,0.00033461096,0.99573517,0.0003886087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04212015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05882921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80149084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026964306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013722114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963737236","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz041","title":"Conflict-of-laws rules on assignments of receivables in the United States and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Law; Statutory law; Commission; Insolvency; Corporation; Accounts receivable; Business; Choice of law; Exclusive jurisdiction; Database transaction; Harmonization; Probate; Political science; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.025296689807900632,"score_gpt":0.22868192943671853,"score_spread":0.20338523962881788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963737236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518914,0.0047077644,7.7125924e-7,0.0010170313,0.00007131822,0.0005335587,0.000017208149,0.0000059708714,0.041754954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495309,0.032780167,0.000016917507,0.017189248,0.000040991104,0.000011243244,0.0001772906,0.000013777611,0.0002394735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929607,0.000012680275,0.00027121263,0.000097572665,0.00020974722,0.00011270805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993659,0.00006387288,0.0003079703,0.00019684371,0.000060989645,0.000004401016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003211421,0.000096162854,0.00024946514,0.000033310316,0.000025335972,0.000021810167,0.00016960666,0.000018033554,0.00010107231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002202124,0.000059795133,0.000023128108,0.00023794037,0.000035535864,0.00018271539,0.00003970529,0.000060563085,0.000013362212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031036387,0.00008062433,0.025224814,0.009167792,0.000031574353,0.000008234734,0.00004447183,0.000034992845,0.000041990534,0.94683385,0.013608872,0.0048917327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022034587,0.000013248538,0.0036604512,0.0028862674,0.000025016016,4.0208118e-7,0.00007148032,0.00007623572,0.00003163426,0.00057854544,0.99235123,0.00008516228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62387675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29435152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97874236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016497846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002835398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7185247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971261347","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz030","title":"Identifying borrowed sources in secured transactions law reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Statute; Order (exchange); Business; Security interest; Law; Law and economics; Law reform; Work (physics); Uniform Commercial Code; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03014785700823235,"score_gpt":0.32824674827119976,"score_spread":0.2980988912629674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971261347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036668198,0.009884924,0.00022670862,0.0054062577,0.00014713194,0.001131347,0.000014376828,0.00010607715,0.9794164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97482324,0.018493108,0.00031704138,0.0024850953,0.00005568741,0.000073987205,0.0000128277325,0.000013084936,0.003725907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998968,0.000056230045,0.0002987494,0.00018062982,0.00023110665,0.00026528703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949616,0.000030187464,0.00008607186,0.0002566541,0.00004491138,0.00008603682],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065425097,0.000091256516,0.0002187528,0.000024389892,0.00036394,0.000072087474,0.00028524938,0.00006332963,0.00094330317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075133566,0.00007784226,0.00011190002,0.00040461015,0.000109197426,0.00041068523,0.00001579658,0.00017221484,0.00048011736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.064433e-7,0.000023470304,0.000021461849,0.00029285354,0.00000434459,5.1625113e-7,0.0010830871,0.0000022007573,0.000016393898,0.99707466,0.000025713536,0.0014545063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011326178,0.000006616691,0.000044894732,0.000762015,0.00001835959,8.768106e-7,0.00051950046,0.000011302051,0.000034783734,0.0026990906,0.99567205,0.00011724626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022881435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07134717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99564636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001831611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006531293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971761648","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz025","title":"L’échange d’arguments autour de l’élaboration du droit économique à partir du Traité mettant en commun les listes des matières d’affaires*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Member states; European union; Humanities; Welfare economics; Law; Business; International trade; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04476772419451526,"score_gpt":0.3109217059744589,"score_spread":0.26615398177994365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971761648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4933565,0.043386083,0.00015839477,0.01976708,0.00036259583,0.0019959002,0.000052715266,0.00020629376,0.44071445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391332,0.057353534,0.000418742,0.0014757073,0.0002021978,0.00010270223,0.000026554244,0.000012791391,0.0012745388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985981,0.0003594863,0.00037951206,0.0001843195,0.00019864892,0.00027992844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900293,0.00030076294,0.00019233991,0.00017847752,0.00024597943,0.00007950889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011716839,0.00016726642,0.00038744305,0.000032134423,0.00058868603,0.00010928123,0.00037615432,0.000060729773,0.00094436307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022272572,0.00014220884,0.00012748862,0.00017715659,0.00023923715,0.00055476144,0.00008709827,0.000116205454,0.00021523156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005670033,0.000059756992,0.0066391695,0.00028636158,0.0000673291,0.0000013266473,0.0026257737,0.000004759229,0.000022524093,0.98402274,0.0015484613,0.0047161053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018522902,0.00008081899,0.004569657,0.0013593636,0.000059937673,0.0000022663658,0.00053849124,0.00019464646,0.0001817531,0.018372571,0.9742436,0.00021168834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053450204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03380868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026526995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088144865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212886798","doi":"10.1093/ulr/11.1.166","title":"18th ICCA Congress \"International Arbitration 2006: Back To Basics?\", organised by the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) - Montreal (Quebec) - 31 May to 3 June 2006.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; International arbitration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.036307240419730914,"score_gpt":0.24562248366154768,"score_spread":0.20931524324181677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212886798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010000904,0.00048124223,0.0033586856,0.10641869,0.0038963973,0.0035298576,0.00048574433,0.00015996827,0.8806693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046334192,0.00057130074,0.0022522886,0.8227308,0.008435538,0.0010294891,0.010081107,0.00016823049,0.10839706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969619,0.000023228651,0.0009311915,0.0004994018,0.0011925347,0.00039177778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974073,0.000081968356,0.00045735054,0.00033673536,0.0016609248,0.00005571297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092616887,0.00039237615,0.00037053172,0.00011912544,0.00039871954,0.00093366933,0.00086821266,0.00010158371,0.0018904193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001839828,0.0003178413,0.00021287998,0.00038585838,0.000085575506,0.0015931724,0.00012981791,0.00018485909,0.0015184326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006635319,0.00012224252,0.000060245195,0.000110906854,0.00004177025,0.0000012262382,0.0000108375325,0.000049386166,0.00026100306,0.46747327,0.53143376,0.00036898808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097232044,0.000026902642,0.0003828541,0.00039789223,0.000089917135,0.0000038540575,0.0000138699515,0.0016157819,0.00037509916,0.003363671,0.99236494,0.00039290992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010479928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05276521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7722723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058173353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020762828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214926895","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.2.299-a","title":"The Evolution of Legal Systems, Bijuralism and International Trade / Evolution Des Systemes Juridiques Et Mondialisation - Ottawa (Canada), 20-21 October/octobre 2000. Conference organised by the Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa in collaboration with the Canadian Department of Justice and the Department of Heritage Canada / Colloque organise par la Faculte de droit de l'Universite d'Ottawa en collaboration avec le Ministere de la Justice du Canada et le Ministere du Patrimoine du Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Library science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0049458349740787964,"score_gpt":0.21857613864043451,"score_spread":0.21363030366635571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214926895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8844133,0.018718533,0.00017104077,0.074793115,0.00027600597,0.0030184942,0.01048189,0.000009692236,0.008117899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925466,0.0066280453,0.00004561139,0.00024081342,0.000025663483,0.00001081459,0.00022132632,0.0000109184175,0.0002701611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963929,0.0019739373,0.0006157895,0.0001955063,0.0005657669,0.00025609214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976135,0.000679455,0.00082475453,0.00018441341,0.00055918354,0.00013873063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018792814,0.00021023018,0.00043872336,0.000025440628,0.0007842201,0.00007278468,0.00032766085,0.00011071939,0.000011085885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012797864,0.00015468476,0.00003310869,0.00046622846,0.0008946072,0.0003210887,0.00002871839,0.00014188072,1.5388485e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024346192,0.000097649274,0.0043956945,0.0022803138,0.0002986763,0.000037212656,0.01479698,0.0015811232,0.00011882745,0.9557219,0.020141363,0.00028677945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018766428,0.00012676611,0.013440625,0.0014039121,0.0011193388,0.00007890016,0.043896563,0.0016429136,0.00024423195,0.000064793094,0.9358308,0.00027455483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048682643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045867827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400639897","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae021","title":"Airline insolvencies and environmental concerns: a comparative legal perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Convention; Business; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.037541660921648824,"score_gpt":0.3537381226340304,"score_spread":0.3161964617123816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400639897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074289967,0.21988235,0.0001126479,0.010053828,0.0003265411,0.00065102463,0.000107590946,0.000104628336,0.7613324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429024,0.052509207,0.00007482328,0.0013530075,0.00020405382,0.0000134155725,0.000033671065,0.0000039075285,0.0029055378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994128,0.00004728269,0.000115908144,0.00012497592,0.00020356881,0.00009548241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981046,0.00005411238,0.000028594537,0.000039977178,0.000027879236,0.000038996393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023954792,0.000064715474,0.00012523126,0.000014167489,0.00019075982,0.000074693206,0.00006571466,0.000023301382,0.00028109853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013721692,0.00005248318,0.00004589854,0.00006466409,0.00025904833,0.00035655886,0.00002026683,0.00007598547,0.0000854208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011940066,0.000009508907,0.0000093389135,0.00008721134,0.000014938613,0.000003454831,0.0022972284,2.835252e-7,0.000009483805,0.9962103,0.00063782017,0.0007192378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042492207,0.000023849328,0.000045332545,0.0007849696,0.000024264038,0.0000031557847,0.0016930079,0.000049806727,0.000017682823,0.004620761,0.99262077,0.000073892574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028403501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022179154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99198294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022021963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005553882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42937785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404588660","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae043","title":"Clearing clouds of uncertainty—a principled approach to determining what qualifies as an ‘accident’ under the Montreal Convention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Clearing; Accident (philosophy); Political science; Environmental science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02947853798332438,"score_gpt":0.29064820283388065,"score_spread":0.26116966485055626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404588660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5039117,0.33474398,0.0037548407,0.0018394047,0.00257039,0.0033973553,0.000015842126,0.0016664995,0.14810003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674794,0.03165005,0.00020192661,0.00032913653,0.000081788574,0.000033146993,0.000008503555,0.00004058237,0.00017546055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999102,0.00004550632,0.00030071803,0.00017582843,0.00017793957,0.00019799748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995243,0.00006595644,0.00003154363,0.00028807242,0.000030392912,0.00005973205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004609245,0.00016094377,0.00032281748,0.00003939637,0.00010273102,0.00013395326,0.00018175833,0.000042626983,0.000017220933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015085854,0.000108178145,0.00015893547,0.00021382733,0.0000415326,0.0004535922,0.00006888535,0.00015446512,0.000040885614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033337015,0.00013943051,0.000061123246,0.022390753,0.0012623868,0.000017346549,0.008415976,0.034639854,0.00038971257,0.6350762,0.001615309,0.29595852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010775804,0.0007000911,0.0033991304,0.047828317,0.0019801501,0.00033761916,0.024296077,0.16015272,0.0011153991,0.007375723,0.74940133,0.0023358506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030183076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042842753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74778605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006819583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000120963405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44113767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}