{"meta":{"query_hash":"9eaf9d826608","filters":{"venue":"Uniform Law Review"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9eaf9d826608","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Uniform+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2161256765","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unv009","title":"Iura Novit Arbiter revisited: towards a harmonized approach?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Supreme court; Duty; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Arbitration; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.05753428096148712,"score_gpt":0.26567606908966646,"score_spread":0.20814178812817935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161256765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018233314,0.056634545,0.019435884,0.41751128,0.0040395535,0.00026076057,0.00010339652,0.0003271787,0.48345402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5597422,0.01579738,0.023228262,0.28283182,0.0045942906,0.00062313373,0.00013831176,0.0003284558,0.112716176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94605017,0.024901006,0.003035149,0.0076581473,0.011904182,0.006451356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758908,0.013919882,0.0017834092,0.0026357013,0.0045896946,0.0011805737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049363207,0.0007226784,0.0018093849,0.005673886,0.010336159,0.032387268,0.00780928,0.029211503,0.005154872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051887088,0.0009757799,0.0013240378,0.0036257936,0.023553815,0.01261002,0.016037468,0.022313418,0.0016573786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141359615,0.000018887362,0.0003719962,0.00011721398,0.00001264843,0.0002556139,0.0030485205,0.00019857363,0.00011666207,0.9586529,0.017321553,0.019871308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026322565,0.000096335105,0.0019338058,0.0024152652,0.000048494083,0.00051136676,0.0045306897,0.00160876,0.00065782695,0.2427974,0.7452718,0.00010204858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027041294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052908573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049363207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019418458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03253151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2610607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315208986","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.619","title":"R. Brownsword /N.J. Hird /G. Howells (eds.), Good Faith in Contract - Concept and Context, Aldershot, Dartmouth - Ashgate , 1999, pp. 326.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Faith; Good faith; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01965605918304419,"score_gpt":0.2897990723030501,"score_spread":0.2701430131200059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315208986","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004959622,0.86752254,0.0012691801,0.04071623,0.0022110904,0.00003063449,0.00036860752,0.000055386838,0.08733038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008875564,0.87839234,0.0016766407,0.0039994465,0.0013356615,0.000053137886,0.00043173184,0.000090361376,0.10514527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778867,0.0006390717,0.00014018608,0.00023543295,0.0010572777,0.00013927645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647504,0.001818756,0.00038546763,0.00012503077,0.0008684435,0.00032724606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025803335,0.0008254243,0.0007835761,0.003448922,0.0016017555,0.004767173,0.00094084797,0.0029295594,0.04825099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005923186,0.00070529565,0.00037064604,0.006565049,0.0025951786,0.006789536,0.001388909,0.0021044863,0.027701072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012986073,0.000014784651,0.0003372778,0.0008130081,0.000009035427,0.000046047397,0.0006925678,0.000096753334,0.000058975947,0.018874798,0.8367622,0.14228164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000481678,0.000007927287,0.0017651013,0.0018600067,0.000009297222,0.00013120071,0.0009329565,0.000042534313,0.000063543586,0.012705573,0.9824645,0.000012551196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03768661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06669074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04825099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039662314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007307813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1614157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320277435","doi":"10.1093/ulr/13.1-2.58","title":"Harmonising The Law in a Multilingual and Pluri-Juridical Environment: A Canadian Point of View (Abstract)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041327497477783984,"score_gpt":0.2905188570617818,"score_spread":0.24919135958399785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320277435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010793882,0.076278575,0.0037536363,0.43098262,0.0024028907,0.000085842796,0.00042021036,0.00009343882,0.47518888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7039604,0.08861927,0.011019356,0.0861755,0.0019746642,0.00013119652,0.00040446653,0.00017757305,0.10753749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98300064,0.0030004377,0.00046715167,0.0011350769,0.009435059,0.0029615264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836948,0.0028930113,0.00057470106,0.000640196,0.009716984,0.0024802957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012092477,0.0005244116,0.0010063646,0.0057651806,0.023093803,0.02134536,0.0025470548,0.007901492,0.0066065434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020530349,0.0005338653,0.00067233905,0.009009294,0.025852213,0.008180037,0.0053583253,0.008459623,0.0005639771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013090056,0.0000149300495,0.0006114316,0.0001351414,0.00001838362,0.00011705645,0.0045559607,0.0003404191,0.00013656526,0.88938826,0.08372097,0.0209477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019483572,0.000025732543,0.006781388,0.0010775104,0.00006268505,0.00018748562,0.013151418,0.0005136663,0.00038315626,0.13965619,0.8379865,0.00015472618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98180586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1019721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1019721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29154792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73986286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327732972","doi":"10.1093/ulr/13.1-2.39","title":"Harmoniser le droit dans un espace multilingue et pluri-juridique : un point de vue canadien","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Ethnology; Political science; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.03511453166318413,"score_gpt":0.31209981244383667,"score_spread":0.27698528078065254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327732972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04895895,0.030006658,0.011957733,0.094712585,0.0008391491,0.000036243964,0.00017625591,0.00005579987,0.81325656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9104209,0.009536043,0.0028325452,0.007972725,0.0003524243,0.000067755645,0.00007895447,0.00010221015,0.068636395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375546,0.0028819588,0.00024802866,0.0007572614,0.0015127943,0.0008444632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540085,0.0022811505,0.00033354037,0.000497819,0.0011501351,0.00033648527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006831731,0.00031300468,0.0006525304,0.0022198197,0.007514613,0.012664479,0.0013640033,0.004147317,0.012843285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013241894,0.00041442868,0.0004449295,0.0033597653,0.019979913,0.012983042,0.0072775865,0.0060230508,0.0010980598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001632393,0.0000061739293,0.00040818568,0.00005005509,0.000010523854,0.000085616884,0.008766576,0.00014883811,0.00008476626,0.9721376,0.0056232903,0.012662086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021059728,0.00004524919,0.004286371,0.00083975267,0.00004047965,0.00021761408,0.02505197,0.0002762201,0.0004891771,0.5282202,0.44044656,0.00006530421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03447478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04229083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008354973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009103445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06854826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327833353","doi":"10.1093/ulr/17.4.599","title":"From Acorn to Oak Tree: the Development of the Cape Town Convention and Protocols","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Cape; Law; Political science; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04555235159467189,"score_gpt":0.3520435758984515,"score_spread":0.30649122430377956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327833353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055658743,0.00945476,0.27408716,0.14532155,0.0085614575,0.006788549,0.0011321971,0.001008828,0.54807967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14403476,0.009664637,0.2226933,0.035169918,0.0029744431,0.009780984,0.0014938762,0.0014348817,0.57275313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91327995,0.03814569,0.007366273,0.007544485,0.030855613,0.0028080272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89445406,0.04317874,0.004632829,0.018135022,0.033873998,0.0057253125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09789662,0.00084345,0.00087833946,0.0047831372,0.009321054,0.019219907,0.005410943,0.009067857,0.017012415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16370621,0.0018350834,0.0006678524,0.0033649972,0.014660437,0.021099173,0.008774102,0.015360624,0.008003903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014825984,0.000020679545,0.00013789223,0.00012312626,0.0000038848007,0.00015237682,0.003566319,0.00022922798,0.00043452243,0.88620114,0.07998046,0.02913553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014140195,0.000029430648,0.00047418952,0.00078594935,0.000005868602,0.00009392019,0.00071861735,0.00048977154,0.00035312766,0.033773635,0.96320564,0.000055669017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13155474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1215786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13155474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024185317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06222294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.517733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332475208","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.633-b","title":"Peter Kaye (ed.), European Case Law on the Judgments Convention, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester/New York/Weinheim/Brisbane/Singapore/Toronto, 1998, pp. L + 964, ISBN 0-471-94089-5.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.04607043350071265,"score_gpt":0.2981543683563499,"score_spread":0.25208393485563724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332475208","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005640959,0.6590527,0.0032020933,0.06326313,0.0043198154,0.000059376736,0.0004721183,0.000101284015,0.26896527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02011914,0.6616312,0.0045219865,0.016533835,0.0037767803,0.00021545062,0.00073100964,0.00020737002,0.29226318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960937,0.001236214,0.00032338375,0.0004118625,0.0016413451,0.00029353442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970952,0.0016568047,0.00035636788,0.00013260165,0.0006114417,0.00014754572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030225453,0.0011856395,0.00080106617,0.0044343905,0.0026855615,0.006571564,0.0015248262,0.005824439,0.037894815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010372659,0.00097102823,0.0005846739,0.006285409,0.00347774,0.012985968,0.002291688,0.0033107307,0.020385968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013708074,0.000015314734,0.0001338549,0.0004897461,0.000007958397,0.00010065986,0.00049063476,0.00012584402,0.00006702579,0.07512144,0.86070716,0.062726595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005478331,0.0000050966796,0.00053662417,0.0010233906,0.000006219217,0.00016988958,0.000286738,0.00005175823,0.00007642173,0.02327764,0.97454315,0.00001761578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02087923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027414674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037894815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004066824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066271448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1267708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963737236","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz041","title":"Conflict-of-laws rules on assignments of receivables in the United States and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Law; Statutory law; Commission; Insolvency; Corporation; Accounts receivable; Business; Choice of law; Exclusive jurisdiction; Database transaction; Harmonization; Probate; Political science; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.025296689807900632,"score_gpt":0.22868192943671853,"score_spread":0.20338523962881788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963737236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08889025,0.001705222,0.015063943,0.011711785,0.00044852804,0.00068731577,0.0022362738,0.00020769882,0.879049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87986255,0.0016356958,0.014288809,0.007720286,0.00015205762,0.00030247532,0.0009731441,0.000105132734,0.09495983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97682834,0.0018874818,0.0016844285,0.0016868921,0.011997581,0.0059153256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759243,0.0064030993,0.001278538,0.0014338323,0.01322071,0.0017395423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007847602,0.00044323728,0.00073705794,0.003439864,0.012313823,0.015923232,0.003839546,0.0047546406,0.0071619675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030689303,0.0011054393,0.0009248018,0.0031344395,0.008134594,0.0024886795,0.0031636264,0.0063276924,0.0008266852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003143016,0.000031150554,0.0035826946,0.000037772454,0.000021565138,0.00046623385,0.0017119568,0.0030909318,0.0003157179,0.9620465,0.020998294,0.0076656304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017586787,0.000075155265,0.028320514,0.0011071805,0.00023807451,0.0007811581,0.007505023,0.020233892,0.004549625,0.2666397,0.6696406,0.0007331246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9772627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076209486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076209486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1552525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5529411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971261347","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz030","title":"Identifying borrowed sources in secured transactions law reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Statute; Order (exchange); Business; Security interest; Law; Law and economics; Law reform; Work (physics); Uniform Commercial Code; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03014785700823235,"score_gpt":0.32824674827119976,"score_spread":0.2980988912629674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971261347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9051336,0.0026774353,0.00540343,0.008496315,0.00006500787,0.00021995383,0.00029542806,0.000038677405,0.07767021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944159,0.00075703516,0.0009133198,0.00048874604,0.000065831,0.000079463316,0.00009417435,0.000016234319,0.0031693766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98888993,0.0039322227,0.0009134817,0.0008914564,0.003941192,0.0014316177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449354,0.02520761,0.01950386,0.003532868,0.00509764,0.0017226577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008671061,0.00020413323,0.0005759046,0.0074085454,0.004293183,0.008789875,0.0015107299,0.0027179064,0.006157274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043804687,0.000605312,0.00047261265,0.009016176,0.009455988,0.007800573,0.009602742,0.0042039026,0.00039491715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015567747,0.00030003814,0.14053129,0.0004871512,0.00011665932,0.004003562,0.10317493,0.0020406854,0.0021342803,0.6845047,0.0053034252,0.05724756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012696159,0.00042170778,0.40274987,0.0037395142,0.00022755808,0.0024330348,0.1893244,0.012183656,0.007314428,0.20390144,0.17731224,0.00026522536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074411565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011986714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013506356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013506356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045760986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09799594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971761648","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz025","title":"L’échange d’arguments autour de l’élaboration du droit économique à partir du Traité mettant en commun les listes des matières d’affaires*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Member states; European union; Humanities; Welfare economics; Law; Business; International trade; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04476772419451526,"score_gpt":0.3109217059744589,"score_spread":0.26615398177994365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971761648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2131661,0.011839332,0.0433091,0.09868021,0.001837135,0.00022260763,0.00080841454,0.00010857911,0.63002855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659047,0.0018766747,0.0046418654,0.0022541797,0.000462385,0.00011127506,0.0001748847,0.00008458421,0.024489507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983563,0.008882573,0.0007181259,0.0011703903,0.004653898,0.0010120536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8943727,0.088864155,0.0030454258,0.0035387962,0.009770358,0.0004086218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018713964,0.00043445776,0.0005138543,0.006597855,0.0051259147,0.009607914,0.0010682732,0.0033739482,0.015650377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05801224,0.0004106009,0.0009757329,0.0038258317,0.008809997,0.00611674,0.0027219118,0.0032592616,0.0013539484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022695545,0.0000369625,0.0026489764,0.00044503028,0.000100187644,0.00045211264,0.01685764,0.00091004046,0.0013159498,0.9424658,0.012232895,0.022307437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011398574,0.0001321654,0.02945053,0.0029540893,0.00027731643,0.0005691206,0.043486204,0.0070254058,0.009900813,0.40626523,0.49967286,0.0001523559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014279337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01420651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018713964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006900652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034079251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098970115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212886798","doi":"10.1093/ulr/11.1.166","title":"18th ICCA Congress \"International Arbitration 2006: Back To Basics?\", organised by the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) - Montreal (Quebec) - 31 May to 3 June 2006.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; International arbitration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.036307240419730914,"score_gpt":0.24562248366154768,"score_spread":0.20931524324181677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212886798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003340146,0.0865372,0.002035791,0.11060266,0.027063625,0.0014697373,0.011469945,0.0007737049,0.7567072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013266477,0.016839374,0.0015781306,0.025593795,0.003801975,0.0007435394,0.00348272,0.00039895723,0.934295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928544,0.0006836075,0.00041626123,0.00053265557,0.0042543476,0.0012587594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99297196,0.00057524256,0.00040583452,0.00035425462,0.004831537,0.0008612575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070761135,0.0016460245,0.001492364,0.0037121116,0.005457926,0.0099143395,0.002835598,0.01389018,0.057760824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011553694,0.0007653736,0.0016274723,0.0038930434,0.002250651,0.0034559565,0.0023955454,0.0075078416,0.027729109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027888962,0.000034990306,0.00018884435,0.0001118134,0.000009597462,0.000047629128,0.00005184115,0.00006696802,0.000114424154,0.005787881,0.98610747,0.007450737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134287675,0.000009846203,0.0021977094,0.00019924364,0.000010228292,0.000022950186,0.000049773967,0.000047490576,0.000089708396,0.0007639932,0.99657625,0.000019369209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5236904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6820526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5236904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025421709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03572207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95822936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214926895","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.2.299-a","title":"The Evolution of Legal Systems, Bijuralism and International Trade / Evolution Des Systemes Juridiques Et Mondialisation - Ottawa (Canada), 20-21 October/octobre 2000. Conference organised by the Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa in collaboration with the Canadian Department of Justice and the Department of Heritage Canada / Colloque organise par la Faculte de droit de l'Universite d'Ottawa en collaboration avec le Ministere de la Justice du Canada et le Ministere du Patrimoine du Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Library science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0049458349740787964,"score_gpt":0.21857613864043451,"score_spread":0.21363030366635571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214926895","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053153757,0.54866195,0.000528058,0.16159767,0.0018532912,0.00016439595,0.0069584935,0.00008501821,0.22699736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6105132,0.25901738,0.001323583,0.007014188,0.0004997623,0.00013161829,0.0033574011,0.00008470292,0.118058145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559814,0.00073109765,0.00024413156,0.00037498155,0.0019585583,0.0010931246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879546,0.0020196254,0.001059117,0.00037542303,0.007322845,0.0012684395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003866119,0.00034813583,0.00054331066,0.006069963,0.008687789,0.009754465,0.0017802463,0.002387751,0.008931803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01253395,0.00077690755,0.0003455805,0.015148118,0.008770035,0.0034045323,0.0017074398,0.0024255603,0.00084890384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022017639,0.00006901161,0.03328672,0.002198607,0.00021231796,0.0004869677,0.018548585,0.0013188724,0.0006462648,0.3123954,0.48303378,0.14758334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039738505,0.00002845888,0.18722206,0.0015134555,0.00013116452,0.00012611227,0.009596545,0.00020876962,0.00039753612,0.0109397,0.7896829,0.000113544615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98817086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99491054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16838464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16838464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15741567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9645559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400639897","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae021","title":"Airline insolvencies and environmental concerns: a comparative legal perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Convention; Business; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.037541660921648824,"score_gpt":0.3537381226340304,"score_spread":0.3161964617123816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400639897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23143901,0.03412972,0.0023454388,0.026525978,0.00021909461,0.000035105182,0.00021386055,0.000011694715,0.70508003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875537,0.007572301,0.00033303146,0.0007266463,0.00011568507,0.000021317499,0.000041631494,0.000005235729,0.0036302498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783,0.0014077065,0.000046074165,0.00012424092,0.00031145642,0.000280573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937039,0.0046541546,0.00081981503,0.00011853196,0.00046823957,0.0002352497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002245063,0.00018570285,0.00028464574,0.0035206925,0.0037120956,0.006263625,0.00082529295,0.002632668,0.01197014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003961134,0.00015146712,0.00021701532,0.0044868295,0.010398217,0.0068974886,0.0026773585,0.0021825752,0.0003167928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000956825,0.000047053072,0.0018067992,0.00018991127,0.0000059933705,0.00042445958,0.013172001,0.00019791673,0.00011413268,0.97749114,0.001669097,0.004871775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027822281,0.00025339157,0.056680705,0.0042159944,0.000061368795,0.0014289236,0.2958362,0.0018388215,0.00065152196,0.22992802,0.40900406,0.000073080686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013764933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020307437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013764933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008340565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021078808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060515344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404588660","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae043","title":"Clearing clouds of uncertainty—a principled approach to determining what qualifies as an ‘accident’ under the Montreal Convention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Clearing; Accident (philosophy); Political science; Environmental science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02947853798332438,"score_gpt":0.29064820283388065,"score_spread":0.26116966485055626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404588660","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015277657,0.004108463,0.5859917,0.09045612,0.00084794406,0.00094202213,0.00041421055,0.00017465721,0.3017873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8132465,0.0022415863,0.16141409,0.01069525,0.0013624699,0.00090176135,0.00015842161,0.00009305473,0.009886906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94952524,0.025091818,0.0028726177,0.005925237,0.013590298,0.0029948396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94435996,0.039135087,0.0033072468,0.0038601635,0.00816467,0.0011728188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0707027,0.0012114489,0.001908405,0.0064260596,0.00895033,0.022335092,0.0075138514,0.012123361,0.006539154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07976763,0.0014255532,0.0028517777,0.0028598704,0.07138942,0.01627743,0.010066466,0.014974744,0.00074566685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038479975,0.0000053068743,0.00012424585,0.000019267602,0.000010259124,0.000068450965,0.0004190955,0.00097019004,0.00002845539,0.99537283,0.0011687179,0.00180928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000988612,0.000009303541,0.0001560287,0.0001283035,0.000017801127,0.00003839393,0.00034597667,0.0026563727,0.000097143,0.98848546,0.00803063,0.000024662946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041386478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045906764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0707027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019444942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032270957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3739161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}