{"meta":{"query_hash":"218f5225aad0","filters":{"venue":"University of New South Wales law journal"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/218f5225aad0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=University+of+New+South+Wales+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1525475572","doi":"","title":"The Kyoto Protocol: An Agreement without a Future?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Convention; Project commissioning; Protocol (science); Climate change; Publishing; International market; Montreal Protocol; Component (thermodynamics); Political science; International trade; Environmental resource management; Business; Law; Environmental science; Geography; Meteorology; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0835774667573879,"score_gpt":0.2470613287772004,"score_spread":0.16348386201981252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525475572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007089395,0.025633333,0.02073333,0.707639,0.014552776,0.000047477733,0.00026348047,0.00018998119,0.22385122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50148565,0.043248348,0.02092022,0.302118,0.015484099,0.00047905487,0.00062840484,0.0006596884,0.11497659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98869914,0.0043450203,0.0004736432,0.001269741,0.0042047305,0.001007672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953656,0.0018820623,0.00046914068,0.00079023605,0.0009039491,0.00058898976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013876816,0.0006443175,0.0007476556,0.001138128,0.004768327,0.010211323,0.0017161105,0.011967885,0.007142833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021275172,0.0003508747,0.0006217412,0.001614734,0.01573488,0.031352423,0.0052064233,0.012217129,0.0022145407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012882932,0.000006756392,0.000049169623,0.00003308676,0.0000037318712,0.000034705354,0.00035215344,0.000092846945,0.000045916,0.96731275,0.025725247,0.006330622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013886366,0.000018704566,0.00018262154,0.00018464512,0.000006756202,0.00006298245,0.0005872253,0.00017962094,0.000091689355,0.66769725,0.33094978,0.000024793895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042111548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026031516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013876816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037610482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008071908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07338846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1694103430","doi":"","title":"Revering irreverence: A fair dealing exception for both weapon and target parodies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Law; Comics; Supreme court; Value (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Crew; Sociology; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052833066548143404,"score_gpt":0.2454073311545032,"score_spread":0.1925742646063598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1694103430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1039495,0.0015197354,0.061828468,0.055744153,0.0015579305,0.00025304247,0.00006079231,0.0003793173,0.7747071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91661924,0.00022947548,0.0056868545,0.028340414,0.00046750664,0.00027372758,0.000029789211,0.00012202109,0.048231017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94186926,0.02650095,0.0030030396,0.006375005,0.01570372,0.00654796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96982354,0.01888074,0.0018657385,0.0046313796,0.0035602115,0.0012384213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029804928,0.0005060015,0.00077858334,0.0011514302,0.011578449,0.010146956,0.003242089,0.01481065,0.005651494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07372352,0.0005843251,0.0010807759,0.000740167,0.019016853,0.008468687,0.01116211,0.015469957,0.001367202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003511659,0.000042680087,0.0010163407,0.00003259716,0.000010420278,0.0008520159,0.015810028,0.00017969676,0.0006626862,0.95946926,0.008565649,0.013323507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007165192,0.00024836612,0.0045739436,0.00066890166,0.00006959521,0.0018915188,0.019226274,0.0023879989,0.0025912698,0.6039939,0.36407056,0.00020604004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012286433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017335897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029804928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053213085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010153414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15762544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1758492907","doi":"","title":"The Recall of Members of Parliament and Citizens' Initiated Elections","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Recall; Publishing; Project commissioning; Political science; Law; Public administration; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.059856400377418024,"score_gpt":0.24901038775821588,"score_spread":0.18915398738079786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1758492907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7036842,0.0059350505,0.0038365875,0.019429244,0.0003330643,0.00006414392,0.00024328913,0.00003258769,0.26644197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093,0.00061772077,0.00024147422,0.00047794415,0.00014037127,0.000015064228,0.000039610874,0.0000058424976,0.007532129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772266,0.016995884,0.00065859983,0.0009437507,0.002106124,0.0020691573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526438,0.02938786,0.011997505,0.0028436254,0.0015814808,0.0015457484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091891475,0.00016052256,0.00034654967,0.0015485429,0.0030255255,0.0056911204,0.0009091487,0.002336407,0.0055778967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045510966,0.0003214335,0.0003690576,0.0017876126,0.0060283146,0.003193216,0.0038004445,0.0026130616,0.00033665306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008627548,0.00026110632,0.099738784,0.0005847436,0.0002008259,0.0018055156,0.2228051,0.0017226667,0.00064994907,0.4776175,0.019657798,0.17409323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094759285,0.0007043813,0.41911465,0.0013932094,0.00022540694,0.0034953272,0.15961601,0.001422445,0.0016112812,0.055245098,0.35679466,0.00028286333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013013873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021753794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013013873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030408606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00201724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048597395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924644488","doi":"","title":"The 'PPSA': Continuing the reconceptualisation of retention of title (Romalpa) security","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Security interest; Lien; Legislature; Perfection; Accounts receivable; Business; Debt; Statute; Property (philosophy); Publishing; Project commissioning; Tangible property; Law and economics; Law; Property law; Economics; Accounting; Property rights; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05981142648466718,"score_gpt":0.24275514738509368,"score_spread":0.1829437209004265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924644488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07838833,0.006113699,0.07297108,0.21944648,0.0022271771,0.000278397,0.00015693561,0.0002942944,0.62012357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8655501,0.001949828,0.023660999,0.03847551,0.0015052612,0.00038514752,0.00008619025,0.0001638881,0.068223186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97707456,0.011992906,0.0011722947,0.0023398853,0.0061575463,0.0012628327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824677,0.008195855,0.0015570323,0.0035316658,0.0033198227,0.00092797796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03110742,0.00031113953,0.0007149963,0.0011424822,0.004737405,0.01278223,0.0035216997,0.009137356,0.0024928497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02933085,0.00067086116,0.0007781038,0.0010188766,0.029928688,0.013254965,0.009391934,0.0131941335,0.0006344168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006696879,0.000009884508,0.00017451803,0.00003255301,0.000003603865,0.00006981556,0.0069057625,0.0001171862,0.00017800338,0.9778389,0.004701921,0.009961079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033940298,0.00013784022,0.0022098469,0.0007110018,0.000027682727,0.0003716334,0.0062673837,0.0017342863,0.0010880339,0.36778846,0.619551,0.00007894306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022055537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021841686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03110742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009349139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023159204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16451377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200397163","doi":"","title":"Dropped HS and the 'PPSA': Lessons from the 'Fairbanx' Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Personal property; Legislation; Law; Security interest; Uniform Commercial Code; Property (philosophy); State (computer science); Common law; Property law; Political science; Business; Property rights","score_opus":0.06583037182818825,"score_gpt":0.20546485249434632,"score_spread":0.13963448066615808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200397163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08964289,0.0040510725,0.004175717,0.19431815,0.0012197642,0.00010471548,0.000094043586,0.000042984495,0.70635056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8154057,0.0028248827,0.0014609675,0.038938344,0.00067792175,0.0002070579,0.00007666852,0.00008384907,0.14032461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933703,0.0025318174,0.00014584922,0.00067554764,0.0016013171,0.0016751855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442804,0.003855922,0.00016517362,0.0003090026,0.0005558287,0.0006861126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01170819,0.00053309137,0.0008320112,0.0014624365,0.020631233,0.014869431,0.0026041984,0.013868531,0.016433148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016015789,0.00054745475,0.00072337803,0.0016285239,0.02716038,0.013454629,0.009030613,0.018687446,0.000850357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009825301,0.000016466352,0.0004566101,0.000012498458,0.0000025270883,0.00059074943,0.0055488423,0.00011230947,0.000022109776,0.98054355,0.008569326,0.0041151955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095648495,0.00005294058,0.0040161847,0.0006607335,0.000028597186,0.00081708835,0.036665644,0.0013450725,0.00032537006,0.5962037,0.35971168,0.00007740195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26214737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27461168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26214737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017530717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016554264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.521243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213204439","doi":"","title":"Conceptualising the rights of a lessee under the personal property securities regime: The challenge of 'new learning' for Australian lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Personal property; Collateral; Lease; Statutory law; Project commissioning; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Publishing; Law and economics; Settlor; Business; Property (philosophy); Law; Common law; Property law; Property rights; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.11436841202167895,"score_gpt":0.27733304086971866,"score_spread":0.1629646288480397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213204439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14369534,0.0028440757,0.052034233,0.11939492,0.00025601304,0.00014740381,0.00006399942,0.000046177527,0.68151796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689971,0.0006697329,0.004401607,0.006037619,0.00014851769,0.00008137857,0.000010795184,0.000014141395,0.019639103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105656,0.0038226724,0.00035042266,0.0010556201,0.0020578227,0.0016568826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99288017,0.0041660503,0.00072909414,0.0007050642,0.0007868245,0.00073284184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012211555,0.00030666086,0.0005122003,0.0012480185,0.007998755,0.012166439,0.002714659,0.012215402,0.003663778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013661101,0.0004907608,0.0006227879,0.0009927333,0.07648151,0.015041611,0.009293921,0.011080622,0.00038245285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002106705,0.0000035600103,0.00013482002,0.0000066450593,7.2111385e-7,0.00006607394,0.005874693,0.00007969399,0.000055428256,0.9926521,0.0002486013,0.0008755717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016432155,0.000029978353,0.0009273675,0.00019287532,0.000011692819,0.000188055,0.007888007,0.0012282277,0.00026634138,0.91512185,0.07409841,0.000030789204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06812693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05323365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06812693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01313212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01477012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13546073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259560503","doi":"","title":"Recognising Universal Rights in Australia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Project commissioning; Legislature; Law; Human rights; Publishing; Political science; Bill of rights; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.070610575375957,"score_gpt":0.3003931602527289,"score_spread":0.2297825848767719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259560503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12859811,0.007689554,0.007716469,0.09772621,0.0013490182,0.00010966994,0.000051763276,0.00006702391,0.7566921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8435924,0.003035114,0.005201456,0.019902788,0.00033643693,0.00009830365,0.000038484774,0.000040402683,0.12775457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367476,0.002114579,0.00027785706,0.0006687083,0.0018762705,0.0013878645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972832,0.0008197041,0.00021436613,0.0003833451,0.0006562994,0.0006431054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059563885,0.00021935001,0.000388362,0.0010055299,0.006095349,0.005148545,0.0008225113,0.0039587603,0.0047968198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011259021,0.00034716752,0.00035854705,0.0006756629,0.010944309,0.006374183,0.01035602,0.0054054693,0.000435842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006712345,0.000017148748,0.0010792115,0.00005919329,0.0000042370984,0.00028669316,0.02904276,0.0001475974,0.00055592105,0.93441105,0.008387276,0.0260022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008380067,0.00005836046,0.011226,0.0004432166,0.000013761151,0.0003164537,0.0101114875,0.0006503738,0.0004448045,0.41429245,0.56239694,0.00003778196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09342283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11739329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09342283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008534282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015815059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18575811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271805363","doi":"","title":"A Compliance System for the Kyoto Protocol","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Compliance (psychology); Convention; Protocol (science); United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Montreal Protocol; Plan (archaeology); Project commissioning; Action plan; Publishing; Political science; Climate change; Law; Engineering; Management; Economics; Meteorology; Geography; Ozone layer","score_opus":0.04037480117105149,"score_gpt":0.22876678958063984,"score_spread":0.18839198840958835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271805363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072147525,0.0018723668,0.28311947,0.045727685,0.0037640086,0.0016440022,0.0008153624,0.002056471,0.6537859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3510525,0.0030813536,0.41392046,0.04280552,0.0055412604,0.008672165,0.0029765016,0.0012565263,0.17069374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94408345,0.021789903,0.0059330813,0.008342725,0.016680589,0.003170294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97494406,0.00847732,0.0015894219,0.0048247413,0.009298504,0.00086588727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049387734,0.0009166324,0.0009780001,0.0037159212,0.008839807,0.0137621565,0.00313137,0.0149061605,0.019547896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05571166,0.00095379207,0.0016204711,0.003528485,0.011703164,0.019208124,0.009829072,0.013180178,0.008751595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038895796,0.0000074423656,0.000034440498,0.0000194096,0.0000026439266,0.000020990365,0.00016390329,0.0001502603,0.000051030842,0.9908593,0.006222818,0.0024637987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005861542,0.000059934755,0.00023477248,0.00022526423,0.000019858418,0.00009768906,0.00022895483,0.0020548007,0.0003207235,0.7300989,0.266526,0.00007445668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006784146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030256119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049387734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058168923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02284541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26119047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289146279","doi":"","title":"Challenging a Potential Juror for Cause: Resuscitation or Requiem?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Aside; Project commissioning; Law; Publishing; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06640430337038426,"score_gpt":0.31678248969345996,"score_spread":0.2503781863230757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289146279","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1056861,0.008466221,0.047667038,0.71928924,0.0050278543,0.00075617555,0.00014700305,0.00020113871,0.112759195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90860355,0.004697579,0.019351419,0.043709096,0.0021739993,0.0003296463,0.00008235505,0.00012298352,0.02092924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705201,0.016842252,0.0017577172,0.0022152336,0.004891608,0.0037730199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96406555,0.022284497,0.0041824826,0.0015383427,0.0040549226,0.0038742113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039791524,0.0005998822,0.0011076054,0.0017529315,0.0095216,0.008664584,0.0025801775,0.015616541,0.014863237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18046641,0.00074054516,0.00092606933,0.0009684744,0.012272367,0.01600953,0.007482249,0.013027858,0.0047212294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047396147,0.00028144868,0.012420343,0.0007734874,0.000090335525,0.00567951,0.07282489,0.0010600946,0.0024080814,0.54429376,0.13816689,0.22152719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014771648,0.00048604253,0.011869364,0.0031517067,0.000093639625,0.00618026,0.13009901,0.0036174287,0.0018949858,0.54764676,0.2943147,0.00049845467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004133075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009945955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039791524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037928156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017175494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21044022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554322188","doi":"","title":"Posturing, Tinkering and Reforming the Law of Negligence - a Canadian Perspective?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; Law; Tort reform; Project commissioning; Political science; Law reform; Liability; Common law; Perspective (graphical); Publishing","score_opus":0.04385904964817727,"score_gpt":0.2452122505781492,"score_spread":0.20135320092997191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554322188","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012630053,0.041043878,0.0011142113,0.7964684,0.0019302362,0.000047344423,0.00013396311,0.0000490411,0.1465829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7094294,0.08408573,0.0053345216,0.1477128,0.0014589891,0.000062795865,0.00017283784,0.00011425518,0.051628716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859073,0.002187468,0.00032999966,0.00084885326,0.0054174885,0.0053088223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98038805,0.0031888678,0.0008508652,0.00058441143,0.011043994,0.003943867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010267914,0.00076646113,0.0008801415,0.0052761184,0.032370765,0.019777328,0.0045075924,0.014231494,0.008876408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032035552,0.00054395135,0.0006856341,0.0065883826,0.037164636,0.011728876,0.004048445,0.011691555,0.0007189702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005688089,0.000068558926,0.0025949313,0.00033821538,0.000030407466,0.00034513758,0.014921407,0.0006334219,0.0002977002,0.7951778,0.13236454,0.053171042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068065034,0.00005787241,0.0134286,0.0015108961,0.00012633494,0.00036379223,0.055481456,0.000990527,0.0005122478,0.15324783,0.77389365,0.00031868037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18954937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18954937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4297868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94000787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610808217","doi":"","title":"Investor Loss from Securities Non-disclosure: A Statutory Presumption of Causation on the Canadian Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Causation; Statutory law; Project commissioning; Legislation; Business; Law; Publishing; Order (exchange); Statutory interpretation; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03991898861520887,"score_gpt":0.24410372532078797,"score_spread":0.2041847367055791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610808217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035516847,0.0030691705,0.028596716,0.22741379,0.0008802143,0.00024676524,0.00070464413,0.00013386461,0.703438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88804436,0.0030830298,0.0064345263,0.034915846,0.0005157854,0.00011523532,0.00016428129,0.00004120949,0.06668579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896506,0.0012893787,0.0003194643,0.00093612703,0.004885324,0.0029190416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99102205,0.0036061602,0.00087174046,0.00070634886,0.0032089045,0.0005848298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086124325,0.00069161935,0.0011380921,0.0023688856,0.0076822652,0.0087560965,0.0040069786,0.008814045,0.010566739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023677321,0.0006200272,0.0017231021,0.0017454703,0.012988132,0.005827259,0.00346804,0.012416134,0.0007696174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007650937,0.000008207983,0.0005418169,0.000013979838,0.0000071025097,0.00010141245,0.00019280578,0.00048685403,0.000039254675,0.99293375,0.00389091,0.0017763041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009842629,0.000052501124,0.0053898604,0.00041342835,0.00012759921,0.00041962124,0.0010557082,0.012845904,0.0005307303,0.8952301,0.08369399,0.0001420925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8464089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8579833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1535911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042360615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078041255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3089912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}