{"meta":{"query_hash":"c8844b43877d","filters":{"venue":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c8844b43877d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=University+of+Pennsylvania+Journal+of+Law+and+Social+Change"},"results":[{"id":"W2624958397","doi":"","title":"Transgender Intrasectionality: Rethinking Anti-Discrimination Law and Litigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Performativity; Intersectionality; Transgender; Critical race theory; Race (biology); Law; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Queer theory; Queer; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Law and economics; Gender studies; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08491800983161889,"score_gpt":0.29554970243466266,"score_spread":0.21063169260304376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624958397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13080043,0.0049692686,0.02907229,0.49859408,0.004836375,0.00020002635,0.00011668213,0.00031673498,0.33109406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89540374,0.001600683,0.0057192645,0.07411708,0.0013820283,0.0001736787,0.000054188582,0.00018162894,0.021367608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665377,0.015203538,0.0018121534,0.0041105608,0.00617211,0.0061638276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8602941,0.12057594,0.0033167305,0.0058888253,0.005779132,0.0041452707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05108119,0.0004922075,0.00069530535,0.0035122226,0.028505594,0.032064058,0.007104611,0.03504979,0.011685754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106354915,0.0010187582,0.0012535701,0.0019537478,0.05056444,0.031764537,0.017980939,0.03303557,0.001283611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033141652,0.000101986734,0.0019298014,0.00006128814,0.000011536553,0.0005093237,0.03699913,0.00018354024,0.00033987474,0.9203619,0.018974796,0.020493684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086783475,0.00013709738,0.004141446,0.0015684011,0.00014363833,0.00078872696,0.116470866,0.0022875653,0.0022797436,0.60099924,0.27088317,0.00021322047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0238618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04724804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05108119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008960411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023179682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27014643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124997244","doi":"","title":"The Right to Die in the United States, Canada, and China: Legal Fictions and Their Utility in a Comparative Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to die; China; Causation; Supreme court; Disparate treatment; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Plaintiff","score_opus":0.057701579302222486,"score_gpt":0.28110308841116916,"score_spread":0.22340150910894668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124997244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17429273,0.038428597,0.0014653149,0.11802559,0.00070030306,0.000056166406,0.00018870758,0.000014555564,0.66682804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96186024,0.011606337,0.00044343268,0.011853703,0.00012597025,0.000034735276,0.000061222396,0.000009346306,0.014004982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953811,0.0013478213,0.00008224578,0.00021984434,0.0012745991,0.001694359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753344,0.0011329164,0.00015338813,0.00010483891,0.00075151236,0.00032389566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041245813,0.0003931408,0.00058700616,0.0032316889,0.018126586,0.008821685,0.001375031,0.0038383063,0.0036022863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006048832,0.00016219715,0.00044713297,0.0045600277,0.03866582,0.004246679,0.003809328,0.005923152,0.000102647144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023470086,0.0000126499135,0.0016167387,0.00004559151,0.000009577155,0.00027290545,0.020682717,0.00018173963,0.00005824723,0.96466357,0.003357161,0.009075666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007918876,0.00012924762,0.03346367,0.0022547015,0.00019705486,0.00049349974,0.19693787,0.0012706534,0.0007858274,0.27281487,0.4913568,0.00021670228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9309906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96459645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09794102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09794102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08222163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71061516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}