{"meta":{"query_hash":"0786b22b38fc","filters":{"venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal"},"cohort_total":571,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":571,"exported":571,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0786b22b38fc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=University+of+Toronto+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1543831736","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2605","title":"Administrative decentralization and tax compliance: A transactional cost perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Tax law; Tax reform; Phenomenon; Context (archaeology); Public economics; Bureaucracy; Indirect tax; Administrative law; Double taxation; Business; Value-added tax; Economics; Ad valorem tax; China; Public administration; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.10012939627459912,"score_gpt":0.2682444937450942,"score_spread":0.16811509747049508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543831736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5881863,0.0021693849,0.16013698,0.013026029,0.00019378656,0.0006723126,0.0004100506,0.00014620122,0.23505887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993186,0.00029208564,0.0024159276,0.000109385765,0.00007981819,0.000068343325,0.00003135162,0.0000072202174,0.0038099182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934214,0.0028065434,0.00036442955,0.0004893508,0.0015822288,0.0013360779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97778,0.011210258,0.0063236593,0.0019724467,0.0019447523,0.00076904043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00445207,0.00041886594,0.00077892025,0.0016515306,0.0013286498,0.0036436163,0.0015714009,0.0019314177,0.011225021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015466,0.00040862156,0.0008344078,0.0023515082,0.0052750576,0.0055428315,0.0025006284,0.002415921,0.00041033243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009271806,0.0002047286,0.011479849,0.00009827614,0.00005541065,0.00039550482,0.00072783604,0.03362686,0.0003571262,0.938366,0.0009605769,0.013635128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014277115,0.00037398215,0.02868177,0.00017474315,0.000113843926,0.00068000355,0.003089637,0.109131575,0.0006564768,0.8446467,0.012206282,0.00010229867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067850235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038891973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011225021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004518593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004030975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037551403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764645577","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2660","title":"Taking purposes seriously: The purposive scope and textual bounds of interpretation under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Originalism; Meaning (existential); Judicial interpretation; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01907488820453316,"score_gpt":0.240325353376364,"score_spread":0.22125046517183083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764645577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083231285,0.0056410604,0.02655139,0.06471032,0.0003714464,0.000113063594,0.00014746808,0.00010337245,0.81913054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809496,0.0010734184,0.0044214283,0.0022996003,0.00010634486,0.00008256995,0.00003753976,0.000063792526,0.010965759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.965694,0.01678727,0.0009826929,0.0019632361,0.01026633,0.0043064663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671943,0.02183708,0.0014686369,0.002575511,0.005584765,0.0013396434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020757487,0.00071504945,0.00084991514,0.004192556,0.031015716,0.029033639,0.002773564,0.0045486456,0.0026726578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037583392,0.0008737056,0.00066557195,0.004604149,0.15047856,0.011335723,0.01127272,0.008916001,0.0003263552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007393717,0.0000038758913,0.000255981,0.000019410956,0.0000025710324,0.000051050327,0.04774043,0.00010100381,0.00008584698,0.9463508,0.0010753789,0.004306123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040705352,0.000018380755,0.0032499626,0.0005910933,0.00004203835,0.00011477459,0.071392514,0.00090244244,0.00064177136,0.78239715,0.14050786,0.00010131441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7880925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79718417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2119075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07329427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10597033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53178966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184234808","doi":"10.3138/utlj.102913r","title":"Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Democracy; Epistemology; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Presentation (obstetrics); Communicative action; Critical theory; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.008568229017063117,"score_gpt":0.23772919759403602,"score_spread":0.2291609685769729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184234808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004813396,0.23388983,0.032681245,0.16212459,0.0046925275,0.00008141549,0.00036347407,0.00029988427,0.5610536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62991536,0.12769926,0.019883351,0.021317776,0.0072586033,0.00047224906,0.0004655691,0.00028652695,0.19270138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964281,0.0023255867,0.00013048065,0.00034003507,0.00056700705,0.00020893864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844235,0.0009341873,0.00016092623,0.000115245515,0.0002264285,0.00012096807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028197623,0.0006670462,0.00064193225,0.0027120549,0.0049587544,0.008554545,0.0010863034,0.004281728,0.009133237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042942306,0.00039911797,0.00044696103,0.0036587513,0.012994551,0.011367029,0.0028111702,0.0037012347,0.0019864682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005707987,0.000002969358,0.00002645803,0.000054343935,0.0000018455336,0.00002312361,0.001497767,0.00007204835,0.000023403258,0.9711231,0.020472074,0.006697167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094111265,0.000007290486,0.00018473236,0.0002708717,0.0000055823084,0.000054936332,0.0012848785,0.0002948276,0.00010024213,0.6707629,0.32701582,0.000008523084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016381612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009977539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016381612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007390754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042114365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053623915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1856655805","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3205","title":"Disgorgement: From property to contract","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Property (philosophy); Breach of contract; Law and economics; Exclusion clause; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Damages; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03433791124766411,"score_gpt":0.2617073319479883,"score_spread":0.22736942070032418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1856655805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07924762,0.0050868248,0.18306927,0.08313108,0.00066244905,0.00010439737,0.0001047553,0.00025491504,0.6483387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97117627,0.0009229635,0.005323555,0.0032541044,0.00025960043,0.00005577623,0.000026634825,0.00006004231,0.01892103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909471,0.003427794,0.00039187536,0.001306504,0.0025389395,0.0013878243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946385,0.002730632,0.0006120964,0.001196063,0.0005064073,0.00031637104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006251438,0.00044673996,0.0006167479,0.0012284309,0.004914888,0.008840571,0.0022984783,0.009028232,0.008048724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012698444,0.0004405731,0.00075785205,0.001103375,0.04681471,0.018141437,0.008653197,0.008692443,0.00063881936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022226923,0.000002616138,0.000042030373,0.000006271451,7.004157e-7,0.00003702573,0.0005931143,0.00008843191,0.000033407876,0.9980269,0.0002779102,0.0008892868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009272255,0.000016761263,0.0001904966,0.00006195293,0.0000056907697,0.00013370963,0.000720359,0.00087801093,0.00021200159,0.9646915,0.03306917,0.000010942582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008521578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056900196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009028232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074622114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006986165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054142416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965314229","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0717","title":"How to redistribute? A critical examination of mechanisms to promote global wealth redistribution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Economics; Distributive justice; Public economics; Redistribution of income and wealth; Distributive property; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Law; Public good","score_opus":0.010327840355007098,"score_gpt":0.20834118173438446,"score_spread":0.19801334137937737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965314229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047748156,0.009842833,0.05725879,0.13533232,0.0012438586,0.00027412205,0.00006895674,0.00010645472,0.74812454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430909,0.0050427276,0.009433178,0.011370303,0.0007047191,0.00039188622,0.00002468128,0.000101558784,0.029839955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943652,0.003038684,0.00015786609,0.0006307108,0.000915504,0.00089205016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964927,0.0020717045,0.0002696826,0.0005623741,0.00046712614,0.00013643345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009689922,0.0006183938,0.0005755879,0.0025969085,0.007023272,0.008388986,0.0018495189,0.0051587494,0.007005351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011426583,0.00039292235,0.0011088141,0.0018522084,0.032817896,0.012074824,0.005823948,0.0053974413,0.00048932486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003117753,0.000004473725,0.000049423397,0.000015437729,0.0000031728541,0.000013149272,0.00056351133,0.00016243417,0.000030511077,0.9966185,0.0007698545,0.0017662938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038342,0.000025709098,0.0005664012,0.0003277702,0.000031384963,0.00008112104,0.0032172746,0.0008994799,0.00044944216,0.89989483,0.09444987,0.000018382227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005137044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006162056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009689922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008949167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056641796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064931035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965994057","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2486","title":"Residential schools litigation and the legal profession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legitimacy; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.011547366703732291,"score_gpt":0.29239031262039017,"score_spread":0.28084294591665787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965994057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29642862,0.006342387,0.0071907295,0.19810936,0.0008264431,0.000076070326,0.000051347815,0.00011875543,0.49085626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710084,0.0010529445,0.00053306436,0.006772401,0.0001963819,0.000014094919,0.00000944574,0.000022478058,0.020390602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842121,0.00699487,0.00030620137,0.0010568538,0.0031031126,0.0043268814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886114,0.00488316,0.0013540577,0.0006621217,0.001957106,0.0025320502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093132155,0.00025139426,0.00029581098,0.0015460072,0.046924673,0.01131297,0.0018650983,0.006800388,0.011214442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018129423,0.000304762,0.00046571292,0.0017260194,0.053954344,0.0049123093,0.013170692,0.008657411,0.00089395355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013187233,0.000054957072,0.0037169068,0.000039279497,0.0000062230565,0.0007584073,0.07436476,0.00031177435,0.0001268882,0.8906611,0.013531998,0.016414393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038261573,0.00010809874,0.012086323,0.0005710924,0.00003216627,0.0012015739,0.27021405,0.0010663216,0.000970565,0.22176473,0.49183598,0.00011077469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41492695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58775944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58507305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04475614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06252655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8250236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966275155","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2499","title":"Residential schools, respect, and responsibilities for past harms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Scope (computer science); Active listening; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Relation (database); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.011223534804351204,"score_gpt":0.2595761314823836,"score_spread":0.24835259667803242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966275155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44306302,0.004070418,0.014105763,0.2368076,0.0013392381,0.0001015141,0.000043238477,0.00018579807,0.3002834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888432,0.0002914779,0.0007572134,0.0032058046,0.000070755945,0.000013856994,0.0000042906254,0.000012503049,0.006800965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766938,0.014049381,0.0008089661,0.0013744424,0.003692225,0.0033812267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97916806,0.0057866634,0.0032524941,0.0022415586,0.0033451214,0.0062061944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018481951,0.00024497957,0.0006042536,0.0010128046,0.025453577,0.0067819585,0.0017621004,0.0058834027,0.0051544933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026139544,0.0004099528,0.0004904573,0.00045242757,0.059054356,0.0063240505,0.01176305,0.008994213,0.00058142544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003170162,0.00018561252,0.016314289,0.00012853454,0.000037860256,0.0016310943,0.44297084,0.00028024905,0.00089817744,0.49473745,0.014116375,0.028667917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026364549,0.00016424971,0.02308691,0.00081955234,0.00005559472,0.0022034016,0.49257678,0.0004093424,0.0011390593,0.20184293,0.27751857,0.00015731787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02800349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056744147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056627914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018241199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097743094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966706145","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.deal","title":"THE JUDICIAL INVENTION OF PROPERTY NORMS: ELLICKSON’S WHALEMEN REVISITED","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whaling; Law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Philosophy; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.007731500490552293,"score_gpt":0.17667975169458153,"score_spread":0.16894825120402923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966706145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079466626,0.017960042,0.01013363,0.43269056,0.003648835,0.000092274204,0.000054772787,0.000060484614,0.4558927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8630407,0.0027959314,0.00177963,0.0695774,0.0017355538,0.00010738162,0.000023826937,0.000054791682,0.060884822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802454,0.008700582,0.00076963,0.0032969245,0.0035185495,0.0034688357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773507,0.017300764,0.0008380053,0.0010441032,0.002650844,0.0008156018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028918158,0.00046464955,0.00071135035,0.0016399325,0.024764199,0.014553787,0.0028185383,0.027334975,0.0029157512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0370859,0.00083386776,0.0007085429,0.0013287903,0.054925445,0.011979664,0.0058109476,0.022060448,0.00049282855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009332522,0.000011950316,0.00028125028,0.000015833724,0.000003818239,0.00029099954,0.014397755,0.00007276585,0.0000883227,0.968971,0.011928096,0.0039289366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007724315,0.0000462187,0.0013802976,0.00034509812,0.000035245197,0.0002443256,0.016250934,0.00068253255,0.0008553116,0.4742091,0.5057606,0.000113064416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12988111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13600992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12988111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021210298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017745381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25825024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967664096","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0048","title":"Giving voice to reality: Michael Trebilcock and pension governance issues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Pension; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Finance","score_opus":0.016384007647004012,"score_gpt":0.20818598397525256,"score_spread":0.19180197632824855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967664096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021127976,0.016907303,0.0038537276,0.7852602,0.0009068572,0.000016988886,0.000026272633,0.000033269604,0.17186752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8729215,0.009446014,0.0014585727,0.07716369,0.002701518,0.000055193457,0.000017410874,0.00004748377,0.036188643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928625,0.00393302,0.00014631102,0.00075843907,0.0014436484,0.00085611024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941321,0.0036727255,0.0005642452,0.00028017777,0.0005273969,0.0008234427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007387088,0.00027204928,0.00044522205,0.0007981019,0.0099936705,0.011024515,0.0014940674,0.010306806,0.004147415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012400159,0.0004378723,0.00030791564,0.0014562433,0.03210166,0.011385644,0.004085826,0.008030881,0.0005603173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000867374,0.000011299633,0.00029662155,0.000024742909,0.0000030369683,0.00021445726,0.010142402,0.00023246526,0.000032261018,0.9489823,0.034203116,0.005848539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014410741,0.000016569174,0.0008129538,0.00017535177,0.0000058022497,0.00028239936,0.01132694,0.0004266865,0.00011808092,0.7245089,0.26228136,0.00003053062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02798884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022601549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02798884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010428668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055879373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07566565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968518342","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0015","title":"Murdering Holiness: The Trials of Franz Creffield and George Mitchell (review)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Philosophy; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.028364857741183785,"score_gpt":0.29161271836724917,"score_spread":0.26324786062606537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968518342","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023635103,0.9304787,0.000024004863,0.066294976,0.0019007963,0.000009489613,0.00002077424,0.000001788647,0.001033049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011027542,0.91357964,0.0001380531,0.06696062,0.0071976217,0.000058173297,0.000032927677,0.000007659445,0.0009977301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911438,0.005615878,0.0007809086,0.00048317315,0.0015588506,0.00041748644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462068,0.03921954,0.0060401694,0.0008571812,0.0054608807,0.0022153438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014349374,0.00087009376,0.0022865608,0.0023398418,0.0019691132,0.0039321114,0.0028359876,0.010591655,0.004637882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096408404,0.00044499204,0.0006721885,0.002917973,0.008633581,0.004327003,0.0021062484,0.007172517,0.00088070234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029119907,0.000024111487,0.000713514,0.013906202,0.00042631084,0.00019563496,0.0012622466,0.00007820016,0.00005753259,0.00903366,0.75243616,0.22157525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005293162,0.00014221815,0.0053933077,0.083492205,0.0008409265,0.0007713788,0.0022073223,0.00004328644,0.00009189329,0.008985537,0.8974389,0.0000637452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046669483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14102106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046669483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006086648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016712302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09279567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969163031","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0064","title":"Why is this taking so long?: The move toward a national securities regulator","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regulator; Business; Regulatory authority; Law and economics; Accounting; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.018817514721210415,"score_gpt":0.19348312394984654,"score_spread":0.17466560922863614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969163031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10252587,0.003009513,0.031312928,0.6959375,0.0010145417,0.00011521722,0.00011797292,0.00013395662,0.1658325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9335129,0.0009760331,0.007923833,0.04041669,0.00020523663,0.000057725534,0.00002975244,0.000029443781,0.01684837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258864,0.002119151,0.00014643047,0.0011247972,0.0020376958,0.0019832298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899811,0.002294403,0.0008770716,0.000686433,0.0039659464,0.0021950086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010614961,0.00021932472,0.0005342708,0.0005231712,0.0089782765,0.0087761665,0.0019077113,0.011552927,0.003643784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016361786,0.00032737764,0.0006823111,0.00074027246,0.012684427,0.006612263,0.0027307745,0.00939322,0.0006564088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029136289,0.000029133009,0.0023331372,0.000032441694,0.000012065759,0.0001643188,0.0019808265,0.0014281828,0.0003953753,0.9681313,0.018326392,0.007137612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013440776,0.00011094887,0.006817564,0.00028117595,0.000082511164,0.00034660057,0.008302891,0.013214702,0.0018461983,0.6953567,0.27332714,0.00017921385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42213833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4829004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96833974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031660244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060435444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83936244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969347150","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0022","title":"Blackstone in America: Selected Essays of Kathryn Preyer (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Style (visual arts); Supreme court; Affection; Memoir; History; Law; Classics; Sociology; Art history; Political science; Art; Psychology; Literature","score_opus":0.017880209350935587,"score_gpt":0.24474282630755573,"score_spread":0.22686261695662013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969347150","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000629646,0.96588147,0.00002236362,0.021063352,0.011159344,0.000012482939,0.00003251136,0.0000047379435,0.0017608425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010108728,0.9497124,0.00011089112,0.029172529,0.012559447,0.00009394654,0.000092561946,0.000014307626,0.0072330264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985353,0.00039341784,0.00019286589,0.00020468845,0.00057015725,0.00010363475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529475,0.0016121066,0.00059435266,0.0000967848,0.0017053038,0.0006967207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029160022,0.001319007,0.0018839622,0.003596185,0.0012808547,0.0034217997,0.0012926876,0.0032933957,0.010899912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011959515,0.0007251643,0.000789986,0.006091309,0.001828238,0.0050753877,0.0029661579,0.004910832,0.0062974617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014422752,0.000009708165,0.00009767978,0.0027208535,0.000020206307,0.00005836009,0.0002084849,0.0000140596585,0.000047469995,0.00046143366,0.9500953,0.04625202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011959076,0.000011429291,0.00078598567,0.01011163,0.00002617129,0.00021468101,0.0003252018,0.0000054859256,0.000020765403,0.00026584454,0.9882069,0.0000138094365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008792721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01600211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010899912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034122453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006827876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036463797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969559824","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0070","title":"Bilateralism versus multilateralism in international economic law: Applying the principle of subsidiarity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Publishing; Political science; Indigenous; Bilateralism; Politics; Law; Sociology; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.014510088909460999,"score_gpt":0.22628280209898266,"score_spread":0.21177271318952165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969559824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02165189,0.0033683153,0.06450285,0.029397093,0.00041159894,0.0000950554,0.000055571105,0.000054534317,0.8804631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700735,0.0019702148,0.010308081,0.0026583483,0.00060997717,0.0002045549,0.000023268774,0.00005408955,0.014097891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994913,0.0024899081,0.00023192809,0.00057289784,0.0011634376,0.00062876224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425477,0.0038613381,0.00045988685,0.0006309855,0.0005083272,0.00028473255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00560516,0.00031862714,0.0005158964,0.0015142405,0.0030753477,0.007450414,0.0009713355,0.0042649284,0.0076903985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017615145,0.0004396063,0.00053376606,0.0019878526,0.021966139,0.013900151,0.0058248704,0.0051882705,0.0006098101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001462879,0.0000014207486,0.00004699967,0.000005084404,9.000666e-7,0.00000995497,0.00020397843,0.00005060027,0.000008106404,0.99812716,0.00037683485,0.0011674964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010891686,0.0000065878016,0.00017935131,0.000039914856,0.0000045264346,0.000028674129,0.00025103707,0.00040018972,0.00003379025,0.99051183,0.008529832,0.0000033182523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051466157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054488746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076903985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052801142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041777957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03831005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971997154","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0000","title":"Representing Indigenous Self-Determination","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Geography; Political science; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.013262252575638518,"score_gpt":0.25375521245036986,"score_spread":0.24049295987473135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971997154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11837391,0.0016353418,0.0067645446,0.027289191,0.00049306033,0.00006796836,0.000035894976,0.00008596563,0.84525424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282234,0.0005007176,0.0010398299,0.0013039552,0.00006604775,0.00001991245,0.000011293771,0.000021838807,0.06881307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954631,0.0018750593,0.00012441896,0.0003695198,0.00081378635,0.001354158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732023,0.00080204086,0.00020958553,0.00039133144,0.0005966694,0.00068005646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044011325,0.00025823282,0.00027624585,0.00058748724,0.015095985,0.007961536,0.0010334079,0.0019462792,0.007495958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004653109,0.00016881847,0.0002421631,0.00058546045,0.022617707,0.0033310095,0.008163195,0.0028644688,0.0006890732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067823917,0.000008523445,0.00090269087,0.000031528165,0.0000029991925,0.00029354164,0.2269197,0.00012233987,0.00043362705,0.753743,0.007237867,0.010297429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006640382,0.000051668983,0.0030167394,0.00020719002,0.000020441861,0.00041624098,0.19025189,0.00067160436,0.0011359525,0.09386621,0.7103112,0.000044284894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14367129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23927969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8563287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018931413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01548776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28567004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972016682","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2485","title":"The settlement process: A personal reflection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Population; Process (computing); Sociology; Geography; Business; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010595712501859554,"score_gpt":0.2732135604849558,"score_spread":0.2626178479830963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972016682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38854292,0.008091055,0.023387404,0.29069352,0.0066388566,0.00030189287,0.00012875037,0.00034035303,0.28187525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94004804,0.0022499934,0.0023662185,0.014543336,0.0006144898,0.00009695608,0.000030957355,0.0002468363,0.039803185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.944738,0.04322682,0.0008151418,0.002680484,0.0038748581,0.0046647666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97339463,0.018554877,0.0011479862,0.0013135762,0.0021182331,0.0034706818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029131694,0.0013566602,0.001051685,0.0023506058,0.045477793,0.025102952,0.0042376597,0.012066534,0.0070691924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050142825,0.0011878562,0.0010754254,0.0023297598,0.059514757,0.026149474,0.01931896,0.03613797,0.0014059459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127255835,0.000044139477,0.00024515184,0.00002399174,0.0000038538055,0.00083707675,0.96218634,0.000092971975,0.00016627592,0.025889384,0.006760793,0.0037372515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053308286,0.00002618656,0.00012898626,0.00012927405,0.000003702067,0.00054115563,0.8529019,0.0001670109,0.00024104772,0.0066943755,0.13913053,0.00003057032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01167633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011594897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045477793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011193183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009114688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15406495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978543247","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0002","title":"Varieties of Vagueness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Philosophy; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.01581975805949516,"score_gpt":0.19431159047135058,"score_spread":0.17849183241185543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978543247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043869857,0.024077881,0.29618287,0.031902596,0.001970385,0.00024676626,0.00076184765,0.00065063615,0.6003373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90308434,0.0055276444,0.052910443,0.006689931,0.0022160322,0.0005388668,0.0005466719,0.0004077818,0.02807836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98498845,0.005829949,0.0013131486,0.002758381,0.0041109533,0.0009991109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815089,0.011088098,0.0011779099,0.0034284934,0.0022027795,0.0005939292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011399843,0.0012264439,0.001306783,0.006841195,0.0054857903,0.013238025,0.0025385332,0.005208345,0.007880068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02651579,0.0009227607,0.002282548,0.004038854,0.035180103,0.023163142,0.011604951,0.006922075,0.0012061818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000506091,0.0000020481416,0.000090845795,0.000025750222,0.000004897854,0.0000743316,0.0015634907,0.00008920966,0.00006528921,0.99545926,0.0007293256,0.0018905542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005804888,0.000006103909,0.00013346468,0.00006776923,0.000007814884,0.0002497461,0.0009205467,0.0004239214,0.00008531075,0.96662384,0.03145866,0.000017086786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016306558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008690498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013238025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005456875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015168526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060288906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978552434","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0012","title":"Future(s) of American legal history","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Critical legal studies; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Legal history; Legal culture; Sociology; Narrative; Political science; Identity (music); Legal profession; Legal realism; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011899754422835447,"score_gpt":0.23535662559417084,"score_spread":0.2234568711713354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978552434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003906928,0.29174715,0.00075363903,0.5084021,0.013935465,0.0000115598805,0.00010210391,0.000047249647,0.18109387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30509526,0.4790823,0.0028466552,0.1027937,0.030579275,0.00013084014,0.00016815675,0.00008986425,0.07921398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987478,0.0005688186,0.0000342403,0.0001501792,0.00032507707,0.00017385723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973463,0.0010474714,0.00016933487,0.00022238301,0.000581609,0.000632942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032093772,0.00031876934,0.00041339826,0.0022731016,0.0063843415,0.012836576,0.0007983886,0.0050029466,0.017539015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00396078,0.0002227763,0.00029265098,0.002671762,0.012570055,0.014901771,0.0023141021,0.004687643,0.00199389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017778,0.00002770965,0.00040566034,0.00030121012,0.000005299951,0.0000487792,0.0037851532,0.000055908135,0.0001269039,0.6849748,0.18739048,0.122860394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000184865,0.000005999802,0.0003522871,0.00041593437,0.000002811726,0.000037022146,0.0024053215,0.000041121617,0.000022068407,0.07253668,0.9241722,0.0000065944973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012975272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022260105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017539015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074936096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010069047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05867386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979206386","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.603","title":"IDEAS, INTERESTS, INSTITUTIONS AND THE HISTORY OF CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY LAW, 1867–1880","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislation; Scholarship; Law; Creditor; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Repeal; State (computer science); Sociology; Economics; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.02171454587795497,"score_gpt":0.24027734574756968,"score_spread":0.21856279986961472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979206386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10316373,0.053418048,0.0020914562,0.052352943,0.0006301599,0.00007899549,0.0008852389,0.00007253162,0.7873069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81092477,0.022568766,0.0014033258,0.0055076755,0.00022919787,0.000044734676,0.00024132262,0.00005527331,0.15902494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973749,0.00023495455,0.00006177404,0.00024584425,0.001022604,0.001059846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978104,0.0005074705,0.00015893814,0.000059040656,0.0011165225,0.00034764578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019606638,0.0005217161,0.00026855888,0.0057098125,0.017780973,0.00822257,0.0011253136,0.0030091442,0.0066473065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053385594,0.00053649675,0.0002870899,0.0058882656,0.032691553,0.0025518446,0.001760582,0.0036055744,0.00048425022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025937965,0.000014621125,0.0022188963,0.00007137959,0.000008994749,0.00026081598,0.040879067,0.0005504272,0.0001344399,0.8924451,0.032849547,0.030540723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010810338,0.000009636026,0.012098931,0.00026997534,0.000014260259,0.00010248095,0.0073149554,0.00020543695,0.00018025532,0.02052797,0.95920604,0.00005912754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71635526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28364474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14489491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83087057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979939751","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0002","title":"Putting the Community in Communication: Dissolving the Conflict Between Freedom of Expression and Copyright","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Context (archaeology); Freedom of expression; Compromise; Law; Law and economics; Balance (ability); Public domain; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.020883743707081768,"score_gpt":0.2580742430135937,"score_spread":0.23719049930651195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979939751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03450836,0.010723767,0.009833889,0.19942862,0.002395515,0.000072799754,0.000048401715,0.00014249873,0.7428463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132271,0.0051489426,0.0033186246,0.01970478,0.002834918,0.00019818719,0.00004181432,0.00022101325,0.055304613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98652595,0.008295806,0.0002363318,0.001050627,0.0025054256,0.0013857932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98145825,0.01311056,0.001111005,0.00095280114,0.0013157042,0.002051701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009690293,0.0007363219,0.0006168572,0.0025769311,0.023906102,0.025444554,0.003052105,0.013957896,0.020005273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023111006,0.00038890605,0.00039847963,0.0022777445,0.071989976,0.029720757,0.021905048,0.0094515225,0.0019535348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019234925,0.00001920102,0.00013619568,0.00007985294,0.000002731378,0.00019193048,0.057184853,0.0000921358,0.00008902625,0.9158933,0.0128299575,0.0134616345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002257377,0.000047049343,0.00035973548,0.00078790466,0.000009351834,0.00027602745,0.07376955,0.00043582162,0.00030661802,0.4849201,0.4390309,0.000034343633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056272014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066273203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025444554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009337095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009569039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067745686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982786921","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0016","title":"The Idea of Consideration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Doctrine; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Epistemology; Control (management); Contrast (vision); Law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03285581476177582,"score_gpt":0.2494688006652572,"score_spread":0.21661298590348138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982786921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021628259,0.005958798,0.20835502,0.05445943,0.0013392068,0.00018527439,0.00011966423,0.00015738404,0.70779693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91004074,0.0016903959,0.026650881,0.011243005,0.0011030731,0.00047108522,0.00007115739,0.0001735069,0.04855617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827172,0.007416972,0.00065608224,0.0034499196,0.004392314,0.0013675708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98950034,0.0050565843,0.0009973974,0.0024395876,0.001196174,0.00080986903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012931424,0.00054533716,0.00093635014,0.0018159653,0.007199982,0.009827179,0.0026256996,0.0061233323,0.0065131094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587377,0.0006356085,0.0013060228,0.0018114961,0.06089709,0.014553239,0.009587661,0.009434066,0.0009798935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021063802,0.0000013717448,0.000034550136,0.0000056430863,0.0000012476843,0.000005733697,0.0003602647,0.000019782752,0.000018992258,0.99826765,0.0003287546,0.0009538762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006776869,0.000017241427,0.000071711074,0.00005153867,0.0000073025267,0.0000530928,0.00031190325,0.00019629403,0.00008781475,0.949112,0.050074853,0.000009556854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048946454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038224729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012931424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065438203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00845022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0683887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982885878","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.909","title":"INVESTING IN DEMOCRACY? POLITICAL PROCESS AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Doctrine; Democracy; Politics; Law and economics; Foreign direct investment; Political science; Economics; Jurisprudence; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.011479221014135078,"score_gpt":0.22215176281388316,"score_spread":0.2106725417997481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982885878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061914776,0.0120020285,0.021758152,0.28244248,0.0007485316,0.000054440603,0.000050968632,0.000057581237,0.6209711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682405,0.0023981186,0.0014657427,0.011388196,0.00059464434,0.00004322111,0.0000144084715,0.000016157988,0.01583894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954312,0.0021753858,0.00011810489,0.00051672035,0.000824341,0.0009342665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959757,0.0023017453,0.00054460956,0.0004448078,0.00037330334,0.00035985583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067346757,0.00015500882,0.00029775032,0.00065446267,0.0033045732,0.010881564,0.00066639675,0.0057178256,0.002992742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010056674,0.00017575093,0.00033550157,0.000909043,0.024604479,0.006432032,0.0028074887,0.0060682544,0.00033468517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017980689,0.0000022448785,0.00007628395,0.0000032040684,5.443299e-7,0.000009890935,0.00032719623,0.00004855608,0.0000173939,0.99781054,0.0007379922,0.0009644662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010365244,0.00001131291,0.00046669986,0.00005131552,0.0000040992377,0.000033024317,0.0006334352,0.0005501906,0.00013481149,0.94982916,0.048268363,0.0000071808763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071515255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057193115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010881564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006309807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004433927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045781076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984436990","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.343","title":"A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE STATE'S FORENSIC SCIENCE AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Political science; Federal Rules of Evidence; Admissible evidence; Law; Scientific evidence; Criminal justice; Contemplation; Adversary; Empirical evidence; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.0980487035760128,"score_gpt":0.36246655556734136,"score_spread":0.26441785199132856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984436990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027740275,0.018178815,0.26518017,0.2330808,0.0026319302,0.00051304366,0.0003361526,0.00017027174,0.45216858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105935,0.005235897,0.0544731,0.021004936,0.0019849811,0.0006802607,0.00010512598,0.00008435212,0.005837793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9283422,0.04916134,0.0039023987,0.005520382,0.0099930465,0.0030805918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8880696,0.08836749,0.004672829,0.0074554365,0.008919756,0.002514882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0636733,0.0008045592,0.0016208475,0.007900449,0.017050032,0.020397265,0.004107676,0.012578498,0.0040480234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10752226,0.0013249435,0.001517343,0.0035944514,0.07516677,0.014190986,0.015910013,0.014394487,0.0005269796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063771777,0.0000048171223,0.00020434926,0.00004350059,0.000006933745,0.00010048265,0.0030096637,0.00018238158,0.00005662049,0.993989,0.0005797692,0.0018160706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018981222,0.00003839644,0.0007032959,0.0008797389,0.000046882888,0.00023326282,0.005116299,0.0004890511,0.00025745068,0.92516243,0.06701113,0.000043075193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01652872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018141849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98304576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016954256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024431325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3367406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985312042","doi":"10.3138/utlj.041813","title":"REFLECTIONS ON THE STATE AS FIDUCIARY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Statutory interpretation; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.0305442363649234,"score_gpt":0.30412674739813045,"score_spread":0.2735825110332071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985312042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011456378,0.09613701,0.015625611,0.39317724,0.003347873,0.0000121698695,0.000058488953,0.00004584192,0.48013943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7749229,0.06320998,0.004271644,0.069592245,0.0051609003,0.00006928123,0.00006036313,0.00011398146,0.08259879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633515,0.0016982416,0.00008764495,0.00040337446,0.0010480273,0.00042753844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972007,0.0021208758,0.00011846928,0.0001657013,0.0002701204,0.00012410691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004847776,0.00027788043,0.00052328967,0.00079009816,0.0037187678,0.007599271,0.0010401336,0.00656782,0.004165799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005292373,0.0002977012,0.0004307289,0.0011224353,0.034587443,0.011052906,0.0035266997,0.010435312,0.00082798017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.213717e-7,6.94825e-7,0.0000071098525,0.0000085299525,3.786257e-7,0.0000069722823,0.000325948,0.000031349984,0.000006114417,0.99613345,0.0026233715,0.00085535314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000277973,0.0000052695245,0.00007896523,0.00016663808,0.0000017191446,0.000044979948,0.0007322366,0.00014495547,0.000053118187,0.79010975,0.20865351,0.000006025067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011652648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010870299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011652648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008242991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005346706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05980742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985582839","doi":"10.3138/utlj.041813-02ra","title":"Normative jurisprudence and legal realism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Normative; Legal formalism; Legal positivism; Law; Critical legal studies; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Realism; Sociology; Legal history; Legal research; Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.009558701956465807,"score_gpt":0.16184893777700615,"score_spread":0.15229023582054035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985582839","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009845915,0.40174097,0.04720347,0.14636691,0.004184095,0.00005500802,0.000083477404,0.00007237097,0.3904477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58110166,0.29174453,0.019916244,0.0342972,0.019133277,0.0003670749,0.00018546882,0.00019017389,0.053064406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965725,0.0017698788,0.00011960601,0.0003185329,0.0010087125,0.0002107632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953968,0.0037387996,0.00020549292,0.00018796726,0.00035629803,0.00011455458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034279567,0.0004737791,0.0006675925,0.002565723,0.0024103918,0.0052621225,0.0011220991,0.003906441,0.002713323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005680803,0.00031087268,0.00034363367,0.0021737982,0.023554703,0.007173088,0.0021031888,0.0050181015,0.0006026918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1609245e-7,0.0000021948993,0.00001589263,0.0000332228,8.0570004e-7,0.000012301666,0.00031530386,0.00007297193,0.000014337748,0.9964766,0.001316007,0.0017397736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022157553,0.000003853309,0.000098205564,0.00030729026,0.000001904567,0.0000457267,0.00034847742,0.00019114181,0.000032923555,0.8653415,0.133622,0.0000049051578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031103815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028479765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00612366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00612366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031782084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044430494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987359688","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0014","title":"The Logic of the Rule of Law: Lessons from Willis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; CLARITY; Rule of law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03158620901448495,"score_gpt":0.28454818479866695,"score_spread":0.252961975784182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987359688","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03113372,0.050796624,0.02412228,0.47314975,0.0028840867,0.000036351026,0.00012846291,0.00016391359,0.41758493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8868365,0.01921442,0.007985338,0.025288073,0.00426008,0.000068139365,0.000055767803,0.00017047867,0.056121215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954081,0.0024372037,0.00016014521,0.000504382,0.001103152,0.0003868552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904565,0.0070110667,0.0003684402,0.00069632864,0.0010051673,0.00046254866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008743367,0.00049874,0.00093938794,0.0019172144,0.0065275226,0.00995372,0.0017430028,0.005769941,0.0023969589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014706742,0.00065695297,0.00065857254,0.0016099473,0.049031086,0.014961414,0.003624591,0.00854001,0.0007571328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003503262,0.0000058173514,0.00006263226,0.0000111112595,0.000001836456,0.0000420692,0.001325641,0.00015423242,0.000009832677,0.9920053,0.0048812116,0.001496817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007498664,0.0000064115134,0.000112906375,0.000068620815,0.0000030333338,0.00004295156,0.0008282549,0.00067099684,0.000046144145,0.9314818,0.0667207,0.000010656734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044956226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022653718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044956226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013628456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010522675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09888178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988010735","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0063","title":"The evidentiary burden for overturning government's choice of regulatory instrument: The case of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Advertising; Direct-to-consumer advertising; Medical prescription; Business; Public economics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.10390471592628747,"score_gpt":0.4148161472062495,"score_spread":0.310911431279962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988010735","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069262676,0.018558815,0.009620245,0.56866354,0.0012667439,0.00013693755,0.00011715895,0.00006774796,0.3323063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8493376,0.008285434,0.0044217263,0.11616351,0.0011828368,0.00012923435,0.000032983415,0.000047461974,0.020399373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95349,0.01741793,0.0019280736,0.0040778993,0.015504087,0.00758188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116877,0.07348634,0.0037774546,0.0029967583,0.007008607,0.0010431572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035659295,0.00049196894,0.001112637,0.00209393,0.01769293,0.021940343,0.00377525,0.032626092,0.0021983227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0740776,0.0010559215,0.0014550727,0.002496209,0.054198656,0.010076389,0.0045470935,0.021299455,0.00037824071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011639667,0.000007709442,0.00034425515,0.0000474236,0.000007532081,0.00038222346,0.0033444902,0.00020686003,0.000111178226,0.98737735,0.005316221,0.0028432177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016144358,0.000091435715,0.0050580474,0.0014732517,0.00023184819,0.00095834647,0.012784611,0.002124724,0.001956207,0.61153847,0.36332977,0.0002918623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41063923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40523666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04906042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052550144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8164981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988984160","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1123","title":"THE LAW AND POLITICS OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Commonwealth; Politics; Political science; Mainstream; Realism; Private law; Legal realism; Comparative law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01074838589350766,"score_gpt":0.2397695653175655,"score_spread":0.22902117942405784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988984160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03728876,0.0035586737,0.006593975,0.028083203,0.00023021564,0.000014081801,0.000026446118,0.000044886896,0.9241597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588222,0.0006985654,0.00076064677,0.0032348072,0.00016655053,0.00002709831,0.000014098697,0.000035537403,0.03624047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962774,0.0018186916,0.00006803512,0.0005560196,0.0006219439,0.00065781956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869424,0.0006108089,0.0001174359,0.00030335085,0.00015714165,0.000117076495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028426165,0.0001996383,0.00032848906,0.0009480168,0.0077305543,0.009366308,0.00072380557,0.0039040998,0.0055156522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037173333,0.0002265808,0.0002933166,0.0007063234,0.036215127,0.0057333144,0.0044960612,0.0046595884,0.0006064328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001423732,0.0000016818448,0.00003497574,0.0000019080733,4.0899204e-7,0.0000063921557,0.00039186308,0.000025231127,0.000013549602,0.9984523,0.00050758343,0.00056260795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067363476,0.000005165799,0.00028340032,0.000045825687,0.0000036697052,0.000029502115,0.00096893194,0.00024413611,0.00012524909,0.9380324,0.060249705,0.000005283765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009062361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009288588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009366308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073896684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036364947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053616047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989387975","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.579","title":"THE ABIDING PRESENCE OF CONSCIENCE: CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGAINST THE LAW AND THE MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL IMAGINATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Criminal law; Conscience; Political science; Constitutional law; Proportionality (law); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Public law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.023906472535384266,"score_gpt":0.2577655830646704,"score_spread":0.23385911052928612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989387975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19741985,0.015581117,0.018344069,0.1857816,0.0008654793,0.000023692939,0.000030752188,0.00007324113,0.5818803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924091,0.0008338026,0.00075858564,0.0025221042,0.00020484603,0.000008618872,0.0000042894494,0.000008218555,0.0032503596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526805,0.0027315775,0.00011706829,0.00040561662,0.0008765147,0.0006011146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668723,0.0020380141,0.00030725135,0.0003772562,0.00023531305,0.00035485005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060144668,0.00023357662,0.00032094444,0.0011689244,0.00784791,0.009307893,0.00093748706,0.0044633495,0.0012604767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007446681,0.0002137426,0.0002670667,0.0006425737,0.11839032,0.007071241,0.005146797,0.006333271,0.00013755202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005109337,0.000004134279,0.00012221676,0.000008360789,9.443268e-7,0.000058294816,0.008836946,0.000073031595,0.000056785735,0.988063,0.00051494985,0.0022563608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009295334,0.000011640096,0.000541831,0.000078935474,0.0000027102762,0.00007634289,0.005429457,0.0002531525,0.0000906596,0.9634022,0.03008804,0.000015806258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020799426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020515304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020799426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077795866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007173376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056445062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990719429","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0013","title":"Frank Iacobucci and the University of Toronto","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Friendship; Character (mathematics); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Social science; Literature","score_opus":0.01291416203427385,"score_gpt":0.27374297899915906,"score_spread":0.2608288169648852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990719429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006079486,0.15716489,0.00068941695,0.32487968,0.01398657,0.00003340914,0.0008754293,0.00020567223,0.4960854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.105855085,0.061156273,0.0006963198,0.014619149,0.0019584836,0.000042682343,0.00036462437,0.00014208588,0.81516534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812,0.0002522154,0.00005502372,0.00031833036,0.0007410273,0.0005133563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572927,0.0004546343,0.00024896394,0.00017047698,0.0014095268,0.0019871062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091244065,0.0005135008,0.0004428639,0.0010301685,0.010826049,0.005616235,0.0005885709,0.0027135413,0.045462206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004008945,0.0003975495,0.00017686213,0.0016297905,0.0040947846,0.0016450164,0.0020512482,0.0025876914,0.007595784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002135667,0.0000059500267,0.00049908005,0.00008257702,0.0000023886591,0.00012878871,0.0017606614,0.000054147484,0.000057983394,0.058305465,0.9210553,0.018026425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022122094,0.0000030797612,0.00084273267,0.00013369219,0.0000018523479,0.000043160875,0.0008868257,0.000023478582,0.000044768592,0.0013366708,0.99667066,0.000010858773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7343702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88139147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0480847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051405028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5343883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991144808","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0029","title":"John Willis and the Challenges for Public Law Scholarship in a Neoliberal Globalizing World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; State (computer science); Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Accountability; Political science; Democracy; Corporate governance; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Politics; History; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.043644719354182224,"score_gpt":0.26449566462811497,"score_spread":0.22085094527393273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991144808","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006658181,0.045512244,0.00072651665,0.87695605,0.006395265,0.000016190601,0.000030965246,0.000053898508,0.06365061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5595694,0.067500375,0.0033903103,0.20195237,0.025071124,0.00013526586,0.00007667592,0.00020944173,0.14209504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591917,0.0017951896,0.00010689604,0.00043333299,0.0012743969,0.00047108665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99068564,0.0061037187,0.00038142694,0.00033835814,0.0011382832,0.0013525777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050092596,0.0003293784,0.0005098371,0.0025769423,0.012569055,0.01550956,0.0012497779,0.0073326738,0.0065144734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010826142,0.0003728628,0.00026741985,0.0029551126,0.03157923,0.01085026,0.0057613114,0.007588099,0.0007820175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007161807,0.00002301121,0.00021011807,0.000065999026,0.0000023203138,0.000103090155,0.0065909433,0.00010732783,0.00004372482,0.79618466,0.18915461,0.007507074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044564986,0.0000060695193,0.00029979428,0.0004011893,0.0000025368377,0.00007732382,0.0077500446,0.00018338914,0.000065282744,0.23474987,0.7564422,0.000017726548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034596194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037476286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034596194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017317127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016482733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12564516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992484021","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2637","title":"The fault of trespass","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Duty; Tort; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Liability; Law; Contributory negligence; Normative; Possession (linguistics); Strict liability; Business; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009435617330577219,"score_gpt":0.24321257248906838,"score_spread":0.23377695515849117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992484021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15592273,0.0058688144,0.06246932,0.13080855,0.0009091561,0.00007493353,0.00016057555,0.00020163982,0.6435842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97584957,0.00052322325,0.0013966277,0.004134734,0.00021618824,0.000026571948,0.000019203082,0.000029297295,0.017804626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99086446,0.0028044807,0.00048584933,0.0017490245,0.0028104787,0.0012857752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197185,0.002898557,0.0009455963,0.0020575458,0.0014914318,0.0006351383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075020264,0.00036394814,0.0006470753,0.0007890068,0.006635981,0.00734632,0.0012544774,0.006844034,0.0039788196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018558867,0.00037303133,0.00044254403,0.00050909125,0.05341307,0.010916307,0.0057517188,0.006559282,0.0009004051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000920618,0.000003631708,0.0004264038,0.000009585099,0.0000035992423,0.00011303658,0.0026032822,0.00011694807,0.00006495126,0.9917705,0.002284932,0.0025939122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017581862,0.000048561284,0.0012383228,0.00015032863,0.0000168479,0.0006157235,0.003121875,0.0009799827,0.0004123686,0.91377074,0.07959741,0.000030361993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012717007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007321281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012717007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056719733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058122533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041153252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993234971","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0009","title":"Private Law and Kantian Right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Normative; Categorical imperative; Law; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Autonomy; Kantian ethics; Philosophy; Public law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01993033948230251,"score_gpt":0.18697039109619312,"score_spread":0.16704005161389063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993234971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04095505,0.008175345,0.0681932,0.086201705,0.0010556055,0.00004125223,0.00009126652,0.00013964968,0.79514706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424536,0.0014358349,0.007560004,0.010069624,0.00057609624,0.00006245274,0.000041240688,0.00006834103,0.037732866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952807,0.0020366586,0.00016454973,0.00085667684,0.0010519072,0.0006094565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981316,0.0008510615,0.00019135147,0.0003694846,0.00029178202,0.00016479741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00463167,0.00035491496,0.00036028147,0.0008800526,0.0041008308,0.0050916257,0.0006588406,0.0036793111,0.00352102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049098255,0.0002415465,0.0005079696,0.0005521049,0.038531497,0.00823641,0.0033238067,0.00563437,0.00068458385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001545275,0.0000012146459,0.000013555273,0.0000023861078,4.680747e-7,0.0000043753885,0.00021425233,0.00002840875,0.000013892616,0.99882156,0.00040755776,0.0004907104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042557826,0.0000047772082,0.00007529848,0.000015657828,0.000001379787,0.000020326235,0.00013097517,0.00012193985,0.000071002665,0.98188365,0.017665917,0.000004782254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034790505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027750046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005692974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005692974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003435979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0413056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993751475","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0012","title":"If Philosophical Legal Ethics is the Answer, What is the Question?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Closed-ended question; Political science","score_opus":0.03466443420024338,"score_gpt":0.35657622478657486,"score_spread":0.32191179058633146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993751475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009955519,0.0072674574,0.00351592,0.9777364,0.001714689,0.000007117046,0.000046357614,0.00002638331,0.008690197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22210781,0.0595228,0.024474321,0.6284615,0.038550448,0.00033007766,0.0003534369,0.00047187656,0.025727805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98933,0.0057706987,0.00036364896,0.00092173077,0.0024824971,0.0011314752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476128,0.031468503,0.0034337444,0.0023876748,0.009506877,0.0055903764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026749719,0.0007819612,0.002011925,0.0023877295,0.0059494334,0.012613577,0.0030042857,0.016846027,0.020603484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068840764,0.0006323779,0.0011044745,0.0026155806,0.04584876,0.037210222,0.005714433,0.019093024,0.008057044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003767897,0.00012161981,0.0011751357,0.0005578472,0.000057213532,0.000103381615,0.0017172369,0.00028749384,0.00018500362,0.84981364,0.12207906,0.02386474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019570916,0.000011596026,0.0004361647,0.0005159849,0.000008175803,0.00008640514,0.004874498,0.00027665205,0.000061922576,0.91213655,0.08155357,0.000018835568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047897045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046508457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026749719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070583154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012819669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14146769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993791420","doi":"10.2307/825930","title":"Redressing Historic Injustice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.008626619001954255,"score_gpt":0.15816022856717196,"score_spread":0.14953360956521772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993791420","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027293256,0.034585632,0.004661649,0.49694183,0.0040075094,0.00006731872,0.000060855164,0.00019554561,0.4321864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6440278,0.02173434,0.0023470244,0.15028928,0.0023407966,0.00011223433,0.000069026115,0.00018278914,0.17889671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970277,0.0008832723,0.00010275157,0.00027663083,0.00090413756,0.0008055243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618536,0.0012785947,0.00047483973,0.00042914235,0.0008076965,0.00082452036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004292547,0.0003260178,0.00034994213,0.0009787529,0.010278339,0.005583628,0.0014259599,0.0075266818,0.0052630533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012593259,0.00031273504,0.00022509719,0.0007058494,0.015919227,0.0058960863,0.0062103877,0.008522868,0.0010665125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023067521,0.00006492457,0.0022527792,0.00014274767,0.000016088345,0.0004930755,0.032133117,0.00027911318,0.0004623556,0.5486257,0.36143607,0.054070935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002277679,0.000040981296,0.0040980186,0.00053298235,0.00003156477,0.0003241628,0.02185737,0.00018165969,0.00070947193,0.08086238,0.8912978,0.000040777402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07014974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1446308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07014974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00532624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009314562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13948286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994050578","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0025","title":"'This New Democracy.. . ': Justice Iacobucci and Canada's Rights Revolution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Law; Democracy; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Economic Justice; Political science; Dissenting opinion; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009781214823715448,"score_gpt":0.22387862478239262,"score_spread":0.21409740995867718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994050578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012426123,0.027618686,0.00085084577,0.79795605,0.003021053,0.000037115224,0.00020698408,0.000057651207,0.15782548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5882445,0.016067024,0.0015030424,0.24791265,0.002256447,0.000059969374,0.00018149691,0.00015614247,0.1436187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917725,0.0012092541,0.00008008273,0.00079531287,0.0027003593,0.0034425196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955069,0.0009741984,0.00021191346,0.00018142298,0.0015316173,0.0015939245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037136816,0.00049835275,0.00046029096,0.0013975126,0.02813327,0.014633873,0.00201741,0.008719867,0.0073487195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009183831,0.0003186906,0.00029962632,0.0018696373,0.024818499,0.0037549054,0.0035625717,0.010701055,0.0006329209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001955694,0.000015883872,0.0009118832,0.000044906017,0.000006536663,0.00016250882,0.007508533,0.0002080725,0.000105711915,0.53982955,0.432546,0.018640896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151347995,0.000007061673,0.0031409813,0.00032735846,0.0000088055,0.00007118135,0.008707053,0.0003375891,0.00016287947,0.061279487,0.92587686,0.00006565361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14082952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14082952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17712745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994274195","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.341","title":"PATH DEPENDENCE, DEVELOPMENT, AND THE DYNAMICS OF INSTITUTIONAL REFORM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Path dependence; Perspective (graphical); Dysfunctional family; Property rights; Path (computing); Development (topology); Law and economics; Political science; Property (philosophy); Dynamics (music); Institutional change; Economic system; Sociology; Positive economics; Political economy; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Public administration; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.007872377906210547,"score_gpt":0.21713897372139437,"score_spread":0.20926659581518384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994274195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.452013,0.0048381747,0.14284906,0.04983487,0.00010048966,0.00024046598,0.00025233324,0.00020004233,0.34967154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907482,0.00068868283,0.00418794,0.00028784675,0.00001665906,0.00005178813,0.000022315515,0.000016548189,0.003979979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997521,0.0012715346,0.00006106638,0.00033124187,0.00036957423,0.00044556297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99389267,0.0029631755,0.0011665955,0.0006529495,0.0007582723,0.0005664306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00499275,0.00021800934,0.00036585517,0.002059208,0.0025245324,0.0041742167,0.0008507148,0.0015646323,0.0064840717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010953593,0.00028204537,0.0004321783,0.0022951257,0.022194378,0.008624272,0.004953243,0.002569263,0.0003100853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008542258,0.000008658718,0.0010393078,0.000012013096,0.00000266365,0.000030038083,0.0009444834,0.0012444095,0.00008432812,0.99207836,0.00024356977,0.0043036435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016400625,0.000021148158,0.0026902682,0.000038299993,0.000005634012,0.00005386607,0.0015061009,0.0035798815,0.00020072449,0.9750046,0.01687247,0.000010598223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006428191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042268042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010164139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010164139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004972179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07374638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995286705","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0425","title":"Republicanism and the division of powers in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Normative; Law and economics; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Politics; Multinational corporation; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Constitution; Lawmaking; Legislature","score_opus":0.005666595961203131,"score_gpt":0.19097371737783328,"score_spread":0.18530712141663014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995286705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5228862,0.0033247569,0.0011377448,0.02866519,0.00016263136,0.00008526025,0.0005387326,0.000052284122,0.44314715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704399,0.00065496535,0.0003326883,0.000943509,0.000012828135,0.000011150093,0.000081855236,0.000013047831,0.027510036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969081,0.00021347754,0.000055469456,0.0003193356,0.00076279853,0.0017407362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701416,0.00044113223,0.00021737674,0.00012251113,0.0012262997,0.0009785141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013298247,0.00016530375,0.00044047902,0.0012459565,0.026150402,0.0059373616,0.0014153017,0.0013550151,0.007956656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056396513,0.0002900989,0.00030563318,0.0028844266,0.008337415,0.0013947258,0.00340076,0.0029445102,0.00025621863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008268049,0.000034311164,0.016057009,0.00006326131,0.000028631248,0.000412525,0.017226968,0.001130236,0.00037662734,0.9205855,0.020296179,0.023705998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017077335,0.00007894405,0.19961531,0.00037563065,0.00015690814,0.00043440252,0.060800456,0.007937645,0.0015000543,0.15135574,0.57727915,0.0002949457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.829568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17043194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1785222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997483733","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.421","title":"DEMOCRACY, COMMUNITY, AND FEDERALISM IN ELECTORAL APPORTIONMENT CASES: THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AND AUSTRALIA IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Democracy; Individualism; Federalism; Apportionment; Political science; Jurisprudence; Separation of powers; Legislature; State (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05433165714937223,"score_gpt":0.29791275718114807,"score_spread":0.24358110003177585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997483733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7262231,0.011355777,0.0006188114,0.011614665,0.00017124027,0.00014479531,0.00017031585,0.000022159958,0.24967915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831753,0.0034318373,0.00047180615,0.0019097436,0.000026544905,0.0000741507,0.00008731823,0.000012663811,0.010810622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444723,0.0015092804,0.00015070748,0.00025625183,0.0014373693,0.0021991467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926004,0.0028336223,0.00039507597,0.00023817054,0.0028366572,0.0010960234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042906334,0.0002500742,0.0007203975,0.006701603,0.02673958,0.007980524,0.0019378194,0.0027385342,0.0026057172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014804062,0.0003868627,0.00042275485,0.01183346,0.011412231,0.0023674245,0.0046528014,0.0035476312,0.00012838555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013222801,0.00020213691,0.038466416,0.00036675925,0.00007227713,0.0029469288,0.1473908,0.001788964,0.00044501078,0.7405447,0.023642132,0.04400164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009282887,0.00010705979,0.30372608,0.0014193137,0.00020485488,0.0011984451,0.35140386,0.0045238403,0.00086666964,0.03537108,0.30083525,0.00025065689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99005836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10872701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08385589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7888733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997740180","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0006","title":"Can the Law Do Without the Reasonable Person?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Honor; Causation; Jurisprudence; Philosophy of law; Common law; Positivism; Sociology; Comparative law; Adjudication; Criminal law; Reasonable person; Political science; Law and economics; Liability","score_opus":0.01632376486803916,"score_gpt":0.24679325122369217,"score_spread":0.230469486355653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997740180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016437463,0.045899794,0.0035137723,0.5647494,0.0065586832,0.000041669813,0.00012905338,0.000082597784,0.37738135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42135853,0.067790665,0.0043101413,0.19641586,0.013651787,0.00019005168,0.00029509433,0.00022822987,0.29575968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429697,0.002399278,0.00020220496,0.0008206345,0.0016579912,0.0006229358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505085,0.0028279081,0.00026832183,0.0002767849,0.0010013923,0.0005747504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048005087,0.0004011643,0.00060187606,0.0011257757,0.005889622,0.007820598,0.0013613428,0.005679255,0.015837332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014287371,0.00037062305,0.0002819443,0.0011416744,0.021311397,0.009847182,0.0025163575,0.008873523,0.0039826976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009804197,0.0000129745995,0.00015544155,0.00006743833,0.0000025035597,0.0000552278,0.0011047357,0.000081621394,0.000028548595,0.7774997,0.20795135,0.01303068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004759367,0.000008902597,0.0003503158,0.0003559387,0.0000034070736,0.00007011924,0.0015404676,0.0001554431,0.000044434903,0.36240354,0.6350462,0.000016513844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03740818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027076136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03740818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00925515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100771645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074380875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998001869","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0002","title":"Constitutional cosiness and legislative activism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Political science; Charter; Nothing; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012407419558927458,"score_gpt":0.2437157712267815,"score_spread":0.23130835166785405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998001869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021937605,0.004961264,0.0013083204,0.022351013,0.0002221621,0.000015893334,0.00005611537,0.000020183275,0.9491274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94977194,0.0018264945,0.0003137251,0.0024397613,0.00037408315,0.00003669037,0.000046568275,0.000017392402,0.04517342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684626,0.0016100213,0.00009063067,0.0003806489,0.0004728791,0.00059959595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674004,0.002093307,0.00033612325,0.00023630628,0.00023917113,0.00035501085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023772414,0.00016843498,0.00029133118,0.0010723746,0.004975669,0.007946669,0.0008820339,0.0023594867,0.014865534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053136265,0.00017135475,0.00025311174,0.0019212837,0.022318492,0.0040500117,0.0040273736,0.0042137266,0.00065940624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035195974,0.000005365005,0.00014441149,0.000012517484,8.737824e-7,0.000014762316,0.0017032303,0.000036803845,0.000018283296,0.99456304,0.002056662,0.0014405559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001730804,0.000016964308,0.0021462431,0.00028432248,0.000007644867,0.00006939604,0.00825036,0.0003594582,0.00024408939,0.63024175,0.35834998,0.000012447507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009807107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011213595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010288301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036485395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07464719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998006502","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0016","title":"The Puzzle of Martial Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Martial law; Proclamation; Comparative law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.009613245002529722,"score_gpt":0.24832261895429203,"score_spread":0.2387093739517623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998006502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08456938,0.012552937,0.0018018982,0.21476601,0.00062113395,0.000012831197,0.00007709938,0.000033232023,0.6855656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582116,0.0023444223,0.00032512654,0.007262546,0.00042638642,0.000008798523,0.000021669532,0.000014856439,0.03138449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985267,0.0004480487,0.000029266865,0.00020583399,0.00036458735,0.00042546017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986926,0.0005359292,0.00011647681,0.00015095243,0.00018766243,0.00031655218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022438169,0.00016214488,0.00030891213,0.0005574195,0.011054047,0.008775471,0.00078551506,0.0038403012,0.005260201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005240221,0.00027167602,0.00019263886,0.0006469517,0.036946543,0.0063035307,0.0038233667,0.0066442974,0.0005043117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029490789,0.0000032260157,0.00014817379,0.000004895967,7.447854e-7,0.000029423578,0.0030722795,0.000036239628,0.000019211218,0.98826456,0.0062851105,0.0021332032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009897808,0.0000120261575,0.0014111366,0.000120811106,0.0000030448382,0.00010824295,0.008065043,0.00026168692,0.00008368053,0.65778154,0.33212894,0.0000139330095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05101681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054563243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05101681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008012146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007627888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101439714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001503077","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2005","title":"Authority, justice, and public law: A unified theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Duty; Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020331275350106637,"score_gpt":0.24490026477474316,"score_spread":0.22456898942463652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001503077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024673773,0.03414356,0.13933091,0.12516959,0.0010215229,0.00020085218,0.00024247925,0.0001985281,0.6750188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9238598,0.014077092,0.028250294,0.007180644,0.002184689,0.00048338808,0.00014731323,0.000109792054,0.023707073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945253,0.002427798,0.00018896219,0.0006036793,0.0015644981,0.0006898161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962387,0.0023066907,0.00028185477,0.00031994423,0.00047485565,0.00037801897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058508758,0.00089793076,0.0013819924,0.006721197,0.007288646,0.018204866,0.0027388665,0.008729397,0.0052484996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00517459,0.00072859216,0.0016748713,0.0037010498,0.043778986,0.026080996,0.0066755046,0.0072735636,0.00071347336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1786627e-7,0.0000042623024,0.00001497353,0.0000060731204,7.533714e-7,0.0000053459466,0.00016199274,0.00014242098,0.000002992559,0.99883884,0.0002529882,0.000568699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008253414,0.000005039282,0.000049880477,0.00005957467,0.0000041305993,0.000009574347,0.00024816673,0.0008627582,0.000012164648,0.9912089,0.0075263493,0.0000051200936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011682021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007895185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018204866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015249724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011620051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110644996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003674295","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.39","title":"FEDERAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: A LOOK AT PATRONAGE IN FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS SINCE 1988","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Judicial review; Corporate governance; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.01858306994758652,"score_gpt":0.2362304961876446,"score_spread":0.2176474262400581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003674295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753372,0.0013803899,0.00032216663,0.0043461006,0.000059446793,0.000016798549,0.00016910689,0.000014748504,0.01835413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948324,0.0002784016,0.000068070694,0.0002198227,0.00006183773,0.0000075861867,0.00006355618,0.0000053704052,0.0044629616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946866,0.0010806577,0.00021740829,0.00039849503,0.0008637845,0.002753056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866807,0.00374356,0.004934586,0.00037617312,0.0014457962,0.0028192329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003988073,0.00007638217,0.00028128753,0.0027596662,0.0052998383,0.002129517,0.000981819,0.0012700212,0.0059776893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016344797,0.00021251541,0.0002386377,0.0036340798,0.0020775036,0.0012754258,0.0017127506,0.0018666622,0.0004989145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034757066,0.0002899819,0.66293234,0.00017667,0.000036546408,0.0017838214,0.1691641,0.00055990176,0.0015622023,0.045562956,0.012202665,0.10538121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008495594,0.00008466175,0.9386587,0.0000925736,0.000010249803,0.00033174653,0.022677563,0.00019074269,0.0002232977,0.0006834017,0.037010837,0.000027646794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1743888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31304875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99275106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072489455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040357597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34674746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004751260","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2505","title":"The role of reparative justice in responding to the legacy of Indian Residential Schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Settlement (finance); Wrongdoing; Plaintiff; Commission; Political science; Order (exchange); Compensation (psychology); Law; Payment; Value (mathematics); Business; Finance; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010039394971988051,"score_gpt":0.26191666166364763,"score_spread":0.2518772666916596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004751260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07114941,0.012592858,0.0181325,0.34213963,0.001918771,0.00017660428,0.000026530299,0.00019484121,0.5536688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94832844,0.0029432916,0.0027459557,0.031597644,0.0009747642,0.00006095321,0.0000071731147,0.000048811562,0.01329307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96584845,0.018073674,0.0008632245,0.0025136522,0.0049427995,0.0077583413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97477764,0.013048623,0.0029621774,0.0021193745,0.0034099754,0.0036822555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02521123,0.0003359445,0.0004606182,0.0022544758,0.02286714,0.028924925,0.0039482187,0.012264047,0.004367214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030481407,0.00042006155,0.00060940866,0.002057533,0.05658096,0.01286901,0.01472983,0.015564383,0.0007850953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012969062,0.000043315384,0.0011169332,0.0000838312,0.000008352909,0.00061142124,0.018653503,0.0003051662,0.0002141785,0.94869727,0.009103476,0.02114972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023596675,0.00015049716,0.00413829,0.0008593581,0.00005774477,0.0014342866,0.082712166,0.0017566107,0.0012553913,0.5572036,0.35022897,0.0001794282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019838259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0379883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012626269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030606821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1333313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006616143","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.tomlins","title":"ANIMALS ACCURS’D: <i>FERAE NATURAE</i> AND THE LAW OF PROPERTY IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY NORTH AMERICA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Property (philosophy); Order (exchange); Settlement (finance); Sociology; Property law; Political science; Property rights; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009206363595720154,"score_gpt":0.2283009194454895,"score_spread":0.21909455584976933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006616143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19637595,0.04842514,0.0037818046,0.22769451,0.0012706708,0.000021349373,0.00020627657,0.000049458507,0.52217484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953183,0.0039232196,0.00034179073,0.0048068515,0.00019473283,0.000009005634,0.00002374502,0.000008863048,0.03750881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937624,0.00021682648,0.00001808224,0.000082028186,0.00012721287,0.00017956168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925226,0.00034867311,0.00012578307,0.000053594664,0.00012776874,0.00009189954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081433094,0.00014455467,0.00014678048,0.00059627736,0.008035369,0.0045828284,0.00053935597,0.0020308325,0.0030290142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014574802,0.000183315,0.00012406259,0.00085875747,0.02788985,0.0024757632,0.0012876426,0.00188699,0.00017989021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009206654,0.000006309358,0.0019236174,0.00003172165,0.0000034669831,0.00020941782,0.041881375,0.000116568015,0.0001063517,0.9201552,0.030453656,0.0051030074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082243805,0.000013508354,0.019155012,0.00028290378,0.000010365376,0.00019913237,0.046399504,0.00020491089,0.00023407092,0.082460135,0.85100764,0.000024546276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56670165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73636365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43329835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02044642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006352837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8717003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007174447","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2004","title":"Two logics of authority in modern law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Epistemology; Relation (database); Identification (biology); Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Public law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0313217026405304,"score_gpt":0.2253329696495683,"score_spread":0.19401126700903792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007174447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06788121,0.009734782,0.19598617,0.062395707,0.000569421,0.00006966443,0.000169087,0.00018412864,0.66300994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657773,0.0011284722,0.015733533,0.0017256001,0.00036716188,0.000081007354,0.000041194504,0.00003298928,0.015112823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532807,0.002246155,0.0001996539,0.00058041216,0.0011337737,0.0005120119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534273,0.0025799193,0.0004847363,0.0005086202,0.00047426933,0.0006098061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005223584,0.0003194983,0.00044255986,0.0019311493,0.0037890736,0.009519311,0.0009780709,0.0029370442,0.00438717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062712454,0.00037539905,0.00063543406,0.0016457253,0.04164118,0.013152638,0.004006853,0.003774906,0.0005289254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001667035,0.0000012539882,0.000014456426,0.0000024095673,2.5045773e-7,0.0000032637313,0.00028014666,0.00003090889,0.000007881042,0.999114,0.00012403722,0.000419769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010821136,0.0000047419985,0.000094035706,0.00001905473,0.0000019911115,0.00002512858,0.00038968783,0.00048905105,0.00005262745,0.9892119,0.00969484,0.0000061456085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005111241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039010677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009918028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009918028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038125827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07196069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009613640","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.499","title":"Electoral Fairness and the Law of Democracy: A Structural Rights Approach to Judicial Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Law; Deference; Fundamental rights; Gerrymandering; Redistricting; Law and economics; Judicial review; Human rights; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015573670904401118,"score_gpt":0.25021697575501783,"score_spread":0.2346433048506167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009613640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022432322,0.022632184,0.31877968,0.18485449,0.0016632022,0.00076092867,0.00027611532,0.00027945498,0.44832164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.896167,0.0073094056,0.04962447,0.012657778,0.0031944064,0.0006212775,0.00009478397,0.00010552379,0.030225385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9486286,0.025726441,0.0021635164,0.005114166,0.013962504,0.0044047087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469416,0.037337676,0.0023257146,0.0038631926,0.008350691,0.0011810444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057789423,0.0004767012,0.0010681964,0.0037911134,0.0077412976,0.015202729,0.0031314907,0.009550636,0.0040805945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06615116,0.0007438173,0.001072763,0.0028737304,0.0324561,0.010500322,0.004159561,0.009743288,0.0005987589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030229392,0.0000050446483,0.000088380315,0.000020144791,0.0000048643255,0.000017042908,0.000405056,0.0003679168,0.000044537064,0.9936394,0.0016567225,0.0037477459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032831736,0.000023284807,0.00031104052,0.00012251516,0.000014240085,0.000034801596,0.0001988388,0.0018572573,0.00020080044,0.9473057,0.04986712,0.000031551277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04727261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061673947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057789423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026895562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03866308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30562335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009940061","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0035","title":"Who's Afraid of Canadian Legal History?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Legal culture; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Law; Legal realism; Focus (optics); Political science; Common law; Legal opinion; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Legal research; Comparative law; History; Black letter law; Private law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009835300970968729,"score_gpt":0.1836732424722006,"score_spread":0.17383794150123186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009940061","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018739061,0.058345012,0.0012209328,0.622732,0.004227523,0.00003388913,0.000607854,0.00015889357,0.29393485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68332934,0.063425966,0.0029761621,0.08262796,0.0021477274,0.00005499178,0.0005847676,0.0002717011,0.16458134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452555,0.00066055893,0.00011619552,0.00057517475,0.0022846397,0.0018379624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910288,0.00094948575,0.00040243941,0.0002695303,0.0051640472,0.0021858227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041943216,0.00062269205,0.00063546374,0.0062153516,0.042470973,0.023936342,0.002296725,0.0031508969,0.01859425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013916238,0.00044912295,0.0003704023,0.0105870245,0.022902299,0.009489836,0.0038620313,0.0040955218,0.0013510418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004352294,0.00002148571,0.008243316,0.00031815036,0.0000309071,0.00038386398,0.038154114,0.00014121177,0.00017875592,0.37903023,0.45006815,0.12338627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005662437,0.0000071527234,0.00987882,0.0004964347,0.000028470638,0.00015873015,0.049625464,0.00015346934,0.00011904835,0.021814011,0.9176354,0.00007733514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99475217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99733436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17506672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17506672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2131079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95680565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010507052","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.579","title":"THE FUTURE OF NATIONAL CITIZENSHIP: GOING, GOING, GONE?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.008006076081529371,"score_gpt":0.24516936515131676,"score_spread":0.2371632890697874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010507052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08065698,0.017269474,0.00030366555,0.6787435,0.0013030673,0.000010803523,0.00014522021,0.00002199163,0.2215453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95905167,0.005768493,0.00017862674,0.014875805,0.00038268714,0.000016559698,0.00004828138,0.000021448366,0.019656524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964813,0.0014637682,0.00006715172,0.0001802528,0.00028092586,0.0015266166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409866,0.0007279919,0.00029520952,0.00025230102,0.00073218654,0.003893681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039559766,0.00022768286,0.00048408317,0.0007687228,0.017206825,0.015681913,0.0010303495,0.0047264574,0.011945127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005683637,0.00022527626,0.00025546952,0.0012592233,0.03352213,0.011397651,0.006181212,0.0064372057,0.000631485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003410236,0.00004208249,0.0063381772,0.000092945214,0.000010274727,0.00034349482,0.09166495,0.000076173936,0.0000639273,0.778995,0.09965795,0.022680962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015501206,0.000022730148,0.012940144,0.00094341923,0.000020583288,0.00025563958,0.48486692,0.0001117335,0.00007530648,0.113447174,0.38724077,0.000060095994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3123612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6333542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3123612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018655494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038385928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6210861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010864096","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0018","title":"Culture and competitive resource regulation: A liberal economic alternative to sui generis Aboriginal rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024077932249131524,"score_gpt":0.20121362087113204,"score_spread":0.17713568862200052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010864096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10093481,0.0014248447,0.013206098,0.059108708,0.00023795405,0.000043116583,0.000026111431,0.00002842021,0.82498986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98424536,0.00025831713,0.0014236536,0.0031778428,0.000103812956,0.00003544151,0.0000047729873,0.000005740599,0.010745015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939014,0.0026365966,0.00017298784,0.00047847684,0.00139433,0.0014162882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507374,0.002000352,0.0006246714,0.0010249036,0.0008210829,0.00045521458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005868086,0.00025398974,0.00037904945,0.0010468534,0.0066871285,0.008289097,0.0013118209,0.004581641,0.0024078693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008450852,0.00026043836,0.00047193427,0.00087655283,0.043679867,0.0036501084,0.0053050164,0.0053959107,0.00023945868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002582978,0.0000028935099,0.00013571611,0.0000031714321,0.0000011378512,0.000026335045,0.00096404913,0.00007923909,0.00004589848,0.99766254,0.00018445247,0.00089206616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030760028,0.00004111635,0.0018551219,0.0001222075,0.000014215449,0.0001333624,0.0040316014,0.0009467829,0.0005060772,0.93532175,0.05696562,0.000031356398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025664942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039705448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008861604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124220885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06429571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012417400","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0005","title":"Methodology and Perspective in the Theory of Lawyers' Ethics: A Response to Professors Woolley and Markovits","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Adjudication; Sociology; Identity (music); Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09049720170802593,"score_gpt":0.4104518565846362,"score_spread":0.31995465487661023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012417400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007343078,0.008160255,0.0015320751,0.98588747,0.0019719382,0.000008402713,0.000007135882,0.0000073630376,0.0016909344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11874207,0.02372258,0.010361584,0.80853486,0.026338592,0.0004816783,0.000032834545,0.00013684909,0.011648998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8618429,0.11535242,0.0026257047,0.0058551175,0.012219113,0.0021047778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7191429,0.25371295,0.004891596,0.0038352343,0.01236926,0.006048018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096283816,0.0010890301,0.0025326756,0.0033851585,0.01554505,0.02073401,0.0066488176,0.024868917,0.0029569382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10255802,0.0011535814,0.0015806727,0.0038962415,0.091950454,0.02415584,0.01186183,0.04762149,0.0006710002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029466233,0.000055874225,0.0002801518,0.00020281698,0.000012448418,0.00018147171,0.025197048,0.00032987134,0.00006641705,0.84667987,0.12024385,0.006720617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060999555,0.000045393183,0.0003843664,0.0008910643,0.000008712483,0.00016203764,0.020409977,0.001038517,0.0001125826,0.573757,0.4030662,0.00006314192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01995214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021288844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096283816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030274263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020022871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50920355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012710559","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2775","title":"The mystery of privity: <i>Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada v Robinson</i> (1915)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.017733287137583733,"score_gpt":0.2270689261279302,"score_spread":0.20933563899034646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012710559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19031785,0.016248181,0.0016554839,0.17961541,0.0009138998,0.00007268412,0.0003181926,0.00007232353,0.61078596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86312556,0.0029415318,0.00049619155,0.035396133,0.00017569495,0.00001902071,0.0000721314,0.00002623702,0.09774739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970559,0.0002602465,0.00003540556,0.00023438958,0.0010073795,0.0014067331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927026,0.00023460206,0.00007707142,0.00002103847,0.0002142137,0.00018286359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011638281,0.00016284459,0.00018204642,0.0006526853,0.018367201,0.005754697,0.0011844238,0.004925494,0.0031667675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026642645,0.00028248507,0.00022277185,0.00090696453,0.0112353135,0.0013199816,0.0017114108,0.0041987514,0.000275123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027676382,0.000010643111,0.0041195396,0.00006637149,0.000013189058,0.002150385,0.02796809,0.00026225008,0.0006495183,0.8595338,0.09443291,0.010765602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027132375,0.000035665413,0.023882153,0.00033975847,0.000049562444,0.0007662379,0.0338878,0.00036740486,0.0010399679,0.027532646,0.9119322,0.0001394852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98255986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99413353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06838462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06838462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073627815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49616742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012965939","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0013","title":"Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness , and: Thinking, Fast and Slow , and: Information and Exclusion (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Psychology; Economics; Nudge theory; Political science; Social psychology; Public economics","score_opus":0.011874162383600046,"score_gpt":0.27119034685486126,"score_spread":0.2593161844712612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012965939","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025044597,0.99698347,0.00004526729,0.0013057406,0.0006895023,0.000010885858,0.00004731966,0.000004752287,0.0008880699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036638716,0.99634415,0.00012569601,0.0015508091,0.000577697,0.00002344029,0.0000802825,0.000004465606,0.00092712615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986646,0.00041964505,0.00017640382,0.00014116598,0.0005215052,0.000076563396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996698,0.0017997249,0.0004148059,0.000066662,0.0008146274,0.00020627552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018727373,0.0011142514,0.0023333426,0.0032578644,0.00044033772,0.0023233118,0.0015017148,0.002227441,0.013245364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008448966,0.00047919946,0.001534524,0.004580354,0.0007973155,0.003665481,0.0010558541,0.004017614,0.0039519765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117742245,0.000044483986,0.00016508273,0.053533513,0.0004444468,0.000044769862,0.000101197926,0.00016350056,0.00015230196,0.0034462807,0.36538094,0.57640564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060664574,0.000097635166,0.0012717705,0.037646033,0.0004020254,0.00030907217,0.000119364595,0.000051836192,0.000117433025,0.0023601365,0.9575232,0.000040824478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004589019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006645902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013245364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013402195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033839103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044310212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014376924","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0023","title":"The Association of State and Indigenous Law: A Case Study in 'Legal Association'","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; State (computer science); Normative; Legal research; Political science; Association (psychology); Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Legal opinion; Associative property; Legal profession; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008501322687538827,"score_gpt":0.25486889242610916,"score_spread":0.24636756973857032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014376924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9004087,0.0006978315,0.0024934197,0.009118206,0.00008332279,0.0001163372,0.00001642005,0.000018631088,0.08704718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99105173,0.00051227864,0.0013820679,0.00049762375,0.000033816534,0.000058990416,0.000006788677,0.000006333315,0.0064503467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153686,0.005364347,0.0002086545,0.00043913844,0.0012855824,0.0011655153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99128425,0.005948096,0.00094485306,0.0004821676,0.0004922123,0.0008484811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008412254,0.00026258008,0.000495784,0.0015644289,0.029623121,0.0048161154,0.001744727,0.005246974,0.002528695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136148725,0.00050346827,0.0005043196,0.0030929851,0.017207688,0.0046480717,0.00793394,0.0057386365,0.00016649568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018810355,0.00021186771,0.014532717,0.00008521962,0.000012350058,0.02319728,0.7496154,0.00032290706,0.00039983157,0.19817767,0.0020970546,0.0113289505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021385365,0.000169386,0.02746725,0.0002742885,0.000060955055,0.022054255,0.8183103,0.0023034024,0.00062666996,0.025300436,0.10334195,0.00006965935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14813013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2940709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8518699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009852535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008773207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29453582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017701405","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1128","title":"JUSTIFYING FIDUCIARY REMEDIES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Economics; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.019099113735496668,"score_gpt":0.25268118527066724,"score_spread":0.23358207153517058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017701405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098286614,0.002865688,0.12756903,0.099332266,0.0019174421,0.0003467031,0.00018094681,0.0004332219,0.6690681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95184404,0.00050945836,0.015552947,0.0104788635,0.0005895915,0.00017499743,0.000034519853,0.0000718671,0.02074372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97712225,0.005921977,0.0013688646,0.0030182474,0.008976325,0.0035923112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97243315,0.015837621,0.001990241,0.004649922,0.004276288,0.00081276975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020002278,0.0007573889,0.0010968482,0.0017484266,0.0057236184,0.008975435,0.0028539111,0.015914088,0.005827099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047186684,0.00060640735,0.00083519565,0.0006975483,0.026189419,0.0074751135,0.0071409666,0.011309936,0.0009144694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056086574,0.000009876278,0.00013748815,0.000013737589,0.0000041475837,0.00005384175,0.00025203335,0.00020816692,0.00011867601,0.9964803,0.0012410737,0.0014751515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042972213,0.00003624951,0.00039084637,0.0001259599,0.000021906633,0.000109571614,0.00032200527,0.002334774,0.0009193439,0.9503757,0.045287006,0.000033603323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008475335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008831713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020002278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007996168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012726368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1057834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018534325","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.080912","title":"BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, IMMIGRATION, AND GLOBAL POVERTY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Naturalization; Immigration; Poverty; Political science; Pace; Global citizenship; Population; Institution; Deportation; Development economics; Statelessness; Inequality; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Nationality; Geography; Alien; Economics; Demography","score_opus":0.0061687815081890645,"score_gpt":0.21858054354721823,"score_spread":0.21241176203902917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018534325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18532294,0.16037446,0.0015913945,0.17890729,0.002205504,0.000029559915,0.00005708026,0.000027748189,0.4714841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939657,0.034801435,0.00026534597,0.0108404765,0.000786415,0.000022994363,0.000017203054,0.0000123609525,0.013596836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999044,0.00049167016,0.000024865605,0.00006948564,0.00012891994,0.000241084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995957,0.00020104302,0.00006800092,0.000028467366,0.000036128033,0.00007070127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012323504,0.00020590176,0.00021819027,0.000720814,0.0046082293,0.004636995,0.0003404657,0.0019041381,0.0023064108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014300627,0.000088601424,0.00022213979,0.0008428588,0.022230646,0.0033976182,0.0047679082,0.0029535368,0.00015003499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004397501,0.000012185182,0.0011747602,0.000045623172,0.000003054639,0.00020828603,0.015623778,0.00007553389,0.000026333502,0.9648605,0.0073811603,0.010584359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012045764,0.00003520025,0.0063129356,0.001357602,0.000012379567,0.00062808074,0.049490236,0.0001579479,0.0001223179,0.5410455,0.40080267,0.000023096072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006623611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009148017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006623611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023488677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023741608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017042339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019028309","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.250712","title":"THE OFFICE OF OWNERSHIP","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Business; Property rights; Subject (documents); Law; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Common ownership; Property (philosophy); Right to property; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01649052370239258,"score_gpt":0.23994697288744257,"score_spread":0.22345644918504998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019028309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012399308,0.004955407,0.021015044,0.038552992,0.0008023875,0.00004440958,0.00014076087,0.00006587396,0.92202395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7933124,0.0048060203,0.004003595,0.007967784,0.0012911842,0.00015087391,0.00012117165,0.00008877256,0.1882583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997063,0.00084539485,0.00011818437,0.0004860874,0.0006855945,0.00080182636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980438,0.000699384,0.00026945482,0.0003918051,0.00029468018,0.00030088995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028364826,0.00034050253,0.0003431696,0.0010327593,0.004970497,0.009355722,0.0013030743,0.0037339013,0.012512368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00451342,0.00032129133,0.00044100883,0.0011418196,0.021281105,0.010977201,0.004587673,0.0040259683,0.001796988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017225512,9.2555854e-7,0.000049142316,0.000002793967,3.7786634e-7,0.0000124447615,0.0004465875,0.000018094903,0.000007966295,0.9966275,0.0018893915,0.00094300846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011183371,0.000018511486,0.0004937246,0.0001246472,0.000008482219,0.0001207758,0.0013524997,0.00038736558,0.00016465156,0.5094261,0.4878793,0.00001272078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027070269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019334061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027070269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064095855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067053204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053825438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020771747","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0002","title":"Law and Film: Where are the Mediators?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popular culture; Legal culture; Statute; Law; Sociology; Legal education; Fair use; Class (philosophy); Legal profession; Political science; Media studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010316664066615881,"score_gpt":0.21227367640987874,"score_spread":0.20195701234326285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020771747","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059550186,0.54909676,0.0011353826,0.3055444,0.0048604584,0.00009518043,0.00016752165,0.000039584058,0.13310568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18431057,0.7179192,0.0011601796,0.030871637,0.0067253998,0.0002503863,0.00022398018,0.00011657489,0.058422044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956729,0.002793022,0.00014555057,0.00029702287,0.0005804864,0.0005110029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926945,0.004286526,0.0005652581,0.00023634332,0.0015047868,0.0007125273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005158921,0.00046418005,0.00070580025,0.0021547945,0.004332703,0.01819249,0.0011975459,0.004965413,0.028796991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014300642,0.0004595047,0.00036230762,0.003096716,0.009701084,0.029727323,0.0033280144,0.0050149476,0.0047416002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110159664,0.00015838858,0.0020534277,0.0046416516,0.000040967643,0.00064138504,0.052243266,0.000050788272,0.00059882744,0.41073316,0.29444447,0.2342836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017820601,0.00004179405,0.0023681512,0.00782187,0.00003856676,0.0003368493,0.09586226,0.0000528008,0.0005801067,0.03088731,0.8619623,0.000030120704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011707842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012344312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028796991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065107774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005864185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09633559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021608390","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.070812ra","title":"RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND INDIVIDUALITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Individualism; Independence (probability theory); Relational theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03045350251775319,"score_gpt":0.2505324012269758,"score_spread":0.2200788987092226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021608390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08090195,0.10941162,0.024419377,0.028327648,0.000723576,0.00004499747,0.0000758172,0.000058576494,0.75603646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580573,0.024503069,0.0017029828,0.0017388937,0.0006456536,0.000033148997,0.00004543713,0.000017420214,0.013256015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810165,0.00076197163,0.000078982834,0.00032031702,0.0005100359,0.00022694952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870193,0.00061511836,0.00019092002,0.00015839604,0.00014484895,0.00018865112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018985502,0.00016286169,0.00027735796,0.00076736993,0.0018259544,0.0032108768,0.00065011665,0.00073257386,0.0046090316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002631469,0.000096431606,0.0002509139,0.0007957626,0.012207056,0.0041640806,0.0036566104,0.0013677666,0.00037362924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032220821,0.000006155697,0.0004919979,0.00007606968,0.0000061940805,0.00007172973,0.0047073667,0.00011206756,0.00008828707,0.97886825,0.0009879365,0.014580599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005385744,0.000023333352,0.0032736734,0.0003175688,0.0000112157795,0.0005789064,0.005458337,0.00016945007,0.00018114338,0.7547675,0.23519905,0.000014524946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023672814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015026453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046090316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017840712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017145306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015418708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023229601","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0517","title":"Administrative penalties in the <i>Rechtsstaat</i>: On the emergence of the <i>Ordnungswidrigkeit</i> sanctioning system in post-war Germany","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law and Political Science","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; German; Politics; Enforcement; Democracy; State (computer science); Law; Statutory law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017888527232253076,"score_gpt":0.25132715204671763,"score_spread":0.23343862481446456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023229601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8413133,0.0023855628,0.0022124457,0.015831036,0.00016229268,0.000015668104,0.00006368468,0.00003855278,0.13797745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997552,0.00024490873,0.000059466867,0.00032849883,0.000017611716,0.0000021692993,0.0000047845147,0.0000051480656,0.0017855099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973361,0.00086483033,0.0000980169,0.00022164415,0.00033939554,0.0011400111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851304,0.0005029532,0.0005117551,0.00009912404,0.00015854939,0.00021464439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030703524,0.00014991529,0.00016481601,0.0009507984,0.0049621295,0.0063316002,0.00054807577,0.0017472627,0.0009614194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004056406,0.00027487313,0.00014550681,0.0012906644,0.014149008,0.003195659,0.0034431133,0.0027530733,0.00014790248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059917944,0.000031809253,0.005920297,0.000030645617,0.0000061468004,0.00053449784,0.039334066,0.00085033325,0.0004695446,0.93321943,0.00441779,0.015125405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051268344,0.00024710046,0.14229219,0.0006956849,0.00005330744,0.0010407486,0.06915448,0.0028891463,0.0038469713,0.12715127,0.65230805,0.0002697385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04608891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0783328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04608891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01222015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004851808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09164125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024212870","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0312","title":"When tribalism meets liberalism: Human rights and Indigenous boundary problems in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Democracy; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Tribalism; Citizenship; Human rights; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.010950430013658355,"score_gpt":0.2184607752053984,"score_spread":0.20751034519174003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024212870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18368557,0.004592888,0.0044126767,0.18832846,0.0005297725,0.00012243555,0.00022891103,0.00008677627,0.6180125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650711,0.0010898295,0.0012789796,0.008663463,0.000080331585,0.000045270197,0.000058784404,0.000054256823,0.02365807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863905,0.0019209792,0.00023919698,0.0011513439,0.0037089887,0.0065890085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846453,0.0041939123,0.0004882171,0.00073127955,0.003054985,0.0030671265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007555596,0.00039966733,0.0010268184,0.0023775345,0.062871054,0.020544467,0.004102147,0.0070899576,0.0098674735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02073649,0.00051173323,0.00072139985,0.0041758125,0.053243723,0.007814739,0.011205324,0.012865092,0.00034164285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021324846,0.00001809226,0.0018909125,0.000031619216,0.00001164327,0.0003262555,0.027310045,0.00045093088,0.00007958598,0.9535358,0.008052131,0.008271719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008740838,0.000024693258,0.010708912,0.00031639307,0.00006446916,0.00028404858,0.12875281,0.003014481,0.0004377703,0.58164334,0.27444676,0.00021888522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99373794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22529764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22529764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28370002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8985449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024261585","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0003","title":"New Modes and Orders: The Difficulties of a Jus Post Bellum of Constitutional Transformation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformation (genetics); Political science; Law; Jus ad bellum; Philosophy; Chemistry; International law; Use of force","score_opus":0.006852739900187109,"score_gpt":0.21864763803405782,"score_spread":0.2117948981338707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024261585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06431108,0.0053329053,0.10781267,0.14041018,0.0016588371,0.00025674395,0.0000805316,0.00023127513,0.67990565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611749,0.0011583818,0.014327951,0.0047898088,0.00075758505,0.0003533141,0.000039422273,0.00010134055,0.017297136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97525066,0.014587326,0.0009475219,0.0022456187,0.0052457335,0.001723162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98485214,0.009062889,0.0008923241,0.0026886214,0.0014210915,0.0010830835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022730296,0.00049815397,0.00083424884,0.0028846366,0.0107356785,0.019673213,0.001980335,0.00672727,0.004614769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028478742,0.0007242444,0.00078261504,0.0013685179,0.10328724,0.029761244,0.012108985,0.01693535,0.0007923824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016411476,0.0000023203406,0.000023280263,0.000002050742,2.506386e-7,0.0000057345355,0.0006571277,0.000031032196,0.0000056991958,0.99811196,0.00016670827,0.0009922412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010106138,0.000010901869,0.000093797375,0.000026242014,0.0000011234857,0.000031575582,0.0014694748,0.00048624258,0.000040441744,0.9779418,0.019878728,0.000009435689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004915406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004395649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022730296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013040918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011248204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12021071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025174668","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.091212","title":"OPINION WRITING AND AUTHORSHIP ON THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legal writing; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Style (visual arts); Writing style; Government (linguistics); Political science; Dissenting opinion; Judicial opinion; Staffing; Sociology; Literature; Linguistics; Philosophy; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.023712041430609454,"score_gpt":0.22749929703170937,"score_spread":0.20378725560109992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025174668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8068046,0.001626733,0.0002520592,0.0076702577,0.00021846716,0.000037458718,0.0007263353,0.00003042568,0.18263364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602444,0.0005977962,0.00021608612,0.00031815688,0.000050490744,0.0000058624405,0.0001636796,0.000023562769,0.012599805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918629,0.001156319,0.00025694934,0.00047802264,0.004740896,0.0015049492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469659,0.013276427,0.0074794223,0.0016603076,0.02488978,0.0057281787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003661403,0.00019628293,0.00036561527,0.003344817,0.01318171,0.007555307,0.0007549886,0.0006384432,0.0074023237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043597728,0.00016218075,0.00017557407,0.006732144,0.0054504224,0.0013721766,0.0023629507,0.0012571219,0.0005743552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022746695,0.000136166,0.24126843,0.00021424981,0.000073484145,0.0023846994,0.37476882,0.0007669154,0.0020807504,0.07990511,0.0891407,0.20903325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029748731,0.00005738184,0.58315176,0.0005824088,0.000048939106,0.00055811496,0.17341055,0.0012796503,0.0012282674,0.009869003,0.22960822,0.000176069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8770632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95522225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122936785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042457167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050448697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30804974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025993770","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0001","title":"Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public sphere; Law; Secularism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Reasonable accommodation; Democracy; Politics; Sharia; Public space; Context (archaeology); Political science; Islam; Theology; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.007957179484469331,"score_gpt":0.23580184041575847,"score_spread":0.22784466093128913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025993770","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043127075,0.99759173,0.000015398064,0.0010518184,0.00051352096,0.000004047187,0.000028861794,0.0000027602314,0.0007487183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006344331,0.9974693,0.000025636677,0.00079393963,0.0005400411,0.0000078543635,0.000060308827,0.0000022160293,0.00046628836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993309,0.00018237361,0.00009755809,0.00010777554,0.0002078833,0.000073610805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973398,0.0015122278,0.0004112345,0.00005108843,0.00050662225,0.00017906682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089392846,0.0009906862,0.0026343449,0.0053088074,0.000640675,0.0038966509,0.0018836807,0.002272964,0.025391795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041760923,0.0005624308,0.0008335706,0.012231448,0.0015720453,0.0041697216,0.0016334653,0.0030557734,0.006711882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061708204,0.000047100286,0.0005493455,0.07099041,0.00017426352,0.00029243322,0.00040342181,0.00019245115,0.00016921235,0.002901336,0.3600912,0.5641271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021872675,0.00003248543,0.0039103697,0.07073972,0.00020095428,0.0010054928,0.00050449435,0.000046421625,0.00003692065,0.0012853575,0.9221863,0.000029624534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005797772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012075211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025391795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021325154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005222347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08494401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026316860","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.23","title":"JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial restraint; Adjudication; Political science; Worry; Economic Justice; Law; Reputation; Honesty; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01814470664394893,"score_gpt":0.26093746463234535,"score_spread":0.24279275798839642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026316860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19319834,0.013752035,0.06661929,0.14998962,0.0013747677,0.00025817624,0.00005973738,0.00014197026,0.5746061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816409,0.0011077973,0.0030370192,0.0072912066,0.0005264177,0.00008639534,0.000009491355,0.00003250713,0.00626817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9309528,0.037958268,0.0036421358,0.0044838465,0.015836505,0.0071265297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9292519,0.047778137,0.0067930617,0.006607839,0.007409347,0.0021596553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046660274,0.00041826506,0.0010862978,0.0015522187,0.012608881,0.010544259,0.0027329,0.011205926,0.002197915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086972095,0.00063053635,0.0006793167,0.0018297491,0.036955114,0.007234404,0.010664695,0.012274911,0.0007065207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002358227,0.0000132557325,0.0009412402,0.00004091278,0.000017651662,0.0002518738,0.010158094,0.00031560133,0.00034650724,0.9782956,0.0024333822,0.0071622278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076813536,0.000070113274,0.0027044695,0.00047999804,0.000038247126,0.00030906338,0.007678965,0.0011006457,0.0006177738,0.88747895,0.099364646,0.00008034373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015272441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016695393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046660274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007533485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016880797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24676609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026561431","doi":"10.2307/825912","title":"The Centrality of the Act Requirement for Criminal Attempts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Criminology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04759333073247084,"score_gpt":0.29318477346848326,"score_spread":0.2455914427360124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026561431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38338578,0.0009761806,0.07255964,0.017148744,0.00045063443,0.00018868143,0.000954101,0.0003080244,0.52402824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309444,0.00010699004,0.0014302889,0.00028782923,0.00019377885,0.000029918134,0.000070077505,0.000069164846,0.004717488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437594,0.001782724,0.0003378375,0.0012033846,0.0014294315,0.0008706219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89190286,0.07983452,0.0071044494,0.0063999924,0.008159785,0.0065984316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005138936,0.00028334418,0.001369416,0.004279484,0.004594906,0.0075391266,0.0017214098,0.0041702306,0.029345911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06606559,0.0006383732,0.0008480549,0.0026120115,0.0075201523,0.010804312,0.0036083094,0.006741342,0.002094246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002968915,0.00008140011,0.004905468,0.0000870208,0.000023102548,0.0003203291,0.0012333127,0.00090132345,0.0012129894,0.97966,0.0026984024,0.008579829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018805802,0.000121532445,0.020030547,0.000092027374,0.00015652608,0.000860696,0.0026645416,0.010391931,0.002027263,0.94725263,0.016158149,0.000056089997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008286836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009055345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029345911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028413692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032961972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09817183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027099529","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0013","title":"Liberal Democracy and the Social Acceleration of Time (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legislature; Liberal democracy; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.007068407538718789,"score_gpt":0.2302690120485928,"score_spread":0.223200604509874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027099529","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025189198,0.9988304,0.0000071785576,0.00056415104,0.00027158193,0.0000029047399,0.000018011713,0.000001412298,0.00027924703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004756208,0.99837697,0.000015132719,0.00057076616,0.00032888373,0.0000069882726,0.000030365662,0.0000010194718,0.00019428694],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941504,0.00014761354,0.00009703377,0.00010049928,0.00018314822,0.000056747172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766374,0.0012502816,0.0005019024,0.000032005573,0.00038963856,0.00016252903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009469638,0.00090834085,0.0019999011,0.0037402944,0.00044080245,0.0026982748,0.0013289611,0.001649067,0.012488364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005002225,0.00047393295,0.000931037,0.007836797,0.00078495726,0.0026259979,0.0010325965,0.0025169693,0.0024725609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013403803,0.0000495058,0.00043759294,0.11818591,0.00035974826,0.000121861696,0.00020571813,0.0002546233,0.00012678962,0.0032537945,0.30958325,0.56728715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006704785,0.00008372609,0.0042897244,0.10361658,0.0005213576,0.00069637696,0.00025961173,0.000059945483,0.00007114529,0.0017215288,0.88856685,0.000045938308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049675265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009648199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012488364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001447384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046473416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04177773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030102691","doi":"10.3138/utlj.52.3.253","title":"Dealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Tort; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.017026486490842728,"score_gpt":0.23118182172628224,"score_spread":0.2141553352354395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030102691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5006869,0.02381113,0.004621715,0.1737588,0.000620742,0.00022427694,0.00023494271,0.00008478329,0.2959568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660719,0.008549899,0.0016093673,0.007752081,0.00008910128,0.00003520912,0.000047041416,0.000019265424,0.015826028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931213,0.0008426645,0.00021722501,0.0005016053,0.0021269415,0.0031901582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538815,0.0011734803,0.0005894417,0.00014532117,0.0014215349,0.0012819384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034577583,0.00035378954,0.00047594187,0.0023832698,0.054033697,0.013406321,0.0034233206,0.004716616,0.005026761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107900575,0.00049083045,0.00050519215,0.0047025885,0.018063722,0.003957583,0.0075095464,0.0068600667,0.00024943388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057846977,0.00022042781,0.04769889,0.00033496943,0.00007071228,0.006753836,0.20895223,0.0013383618,0.0006852921,0.57011074,0.045866124,0.117910564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004719019,0.000094958064,0.07993902,0.0012566242,0.00017879122,0.0033815731,0.50991404,0.0027222498,0.0010488735,0.058355547,0.34276524,0.00029588392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99435186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17084499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17084499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28450516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9617023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030652659","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0020","title":"The Contextual Turn: Iacobucci's Legacy and the Standard of Review in Administrative Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Standard of review; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Scrutiny; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02791156109271762,"score_gpt":0.3187172411592737,"score_spread":0.29080568006655605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030652659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02546862,0.08125174,0.023981024,0.5878915,0.0051814686,0.00019842564,0.00030416646,0.00017368766,0.2755494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8213431,0.018625364,0.015367444,0.123348966,0.00590525,0.0002722116,0.00011115292,0.00024560743,0.014780905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95414066,0.01608256,0.0018628556,0.007943206,0.014806485,0.0051641753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94312996,0.032323886,0.0027828077,0.0042416323,0.013903984,0.003617678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02722309,0.00087616284,0.0017861803,0.006896297,0.028796079,0.040068947,0.0044121635,0.012969508,0.0032401616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054268394,0.0011691249,0.0012657336,0.006926338,0.101335354,0.013823535,0.009145907,0.019947784,0.00048015645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012378225,0.0000071117224,0.00055807456,0.00005858706,0.000011756352,0.00009785508,0.0066372547,0.00013068595,0.00009760278,0.97892064,0.008530914,0.004937081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004663955,0.000033583852,0.0054468713,0.0011294394,0.000089764035,0.00020259625,0.0090011265,0.0004919196,0.00035401105,0.58967483,0.39330873,0.00022045159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6649632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70941293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6649632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09255461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08213367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6740198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031497028","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0026","title":"Banging Constitutional Bibles: Observing Constitutional Culture in Transition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Modernity; Political economy; Globalization; Ideology; Citizenship; Face (sociological concept); Political science; State (computer science); Economic history; Sociology; Law; History; Social science","score_opus":0.021269041020626062,"score_gpt":0.25743577320305894,"score_spread":0.23616673218243286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031497028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98747545,0.000069783884,0.00031031884,0.0005211165,0.000008588792,0.000015281843,0.00005988883,0.000008842959,0.011530694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925476,0.000023842455,0.00011046319,0.000045251756,0.0000018498943,0.000009595867,0.00001865692,0.0000042706006,0.0005312439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989912,0.0005267509,0.000031675692,0.00009418032,0.00013276955,0.00022346321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579996,0.0017730859,0.00083225,0.00035481996,0.00046826946,0.0007715641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002080329,0.0001060061,0.00017237947,0.0013002352,0.0041324017,0.0043284493,0.00052988715,0.00074713636,0.0030314182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008630149,0.0001810545,0.000116776944,0.0012721283,0.006042296,0.0027620187,0.004535589,0.0021211314,0.00023331998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022676581,0.00014012054,0.082968876,0.00005219983,0.0000149495545,0.00020957454,0.8734786,0.00016436272,0.0030063745,0.015860243,0.0014856101,0.02239229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015017316,0.00011810232,0.21136102,0.00004629392,0.000009894839,0.00008265497,0.76462907,0.00041428115,0.0012130339,0.0057270764,0.01634518,0.000038409693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027410917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05561309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027410917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026637095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014145796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054502726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031959760","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.1","title":"THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Water Resources and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Principal (computer security); Judicial independence; Enforcement; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.004430792985953958,"score_gpt":0.20821857349087775,"score_spread":0.2037877805049238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031959760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030796265,0.010818411,0.052020617,0.12975945,0.00097368995,0.00013414731,0.00009572403,0.000112232956,0.7752895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94144446,0.0033314372,0.008776703,0.00937457,0.0010220816,0.00024889884,0.000040698986,0.00006882165,0.03569238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97984844,0.011575162,0.0007102192,0.0016458874,0.0032089173,0.003011439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98456347,0.011146339,0.0010151074,0.0010660811,0.0013774211,0.0008315084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01600775,0.00040587646,0.00071647443,0.0023825942,0.010684671,0.016172161,0.001612183,0.009196287,0.004782847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022881562,0.00093365,0.00065467355,0.0019779587,0.057468273,0.011331807,0.0052129347,0.009880481,0.00077745493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010161809,0.0000011558053,0.00004112518,0.0000037047055,7.226536e-7,0.000011911302,0.000276664,0.00006506455,0.000014782194,0.9988109,0.00026758993,0.0005054257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018667004,0.00001322731,0.00035016343,0.00009500984,0.000008923353,0.00003302987,0.00052007113,0.0005023337,0.000108315035,0.9457936,0.052540213,0.000016403623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020619515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021671144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020619515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013685346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016591553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0992946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034043494","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0302-3","title":"INJUSTICE AMPLIFIED BY HIV NON-DISCLOSURE RULING","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Punitive damages; Supreme court; Charter; Test (biology); Political science; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Hiv test; Law; Criminology; Transmission (telecommunications); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Virology; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.009187688988705362,"score_gpt":0.22093227853897418,"score_spread":0.2117445895502688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034043494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4084462,0.0014757835,0.015980108,0.064895436,0.0013195939,0.0002362676,0.000122969,0.00014672546,0.5073769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693963,0.00024021309,0.0019830968,0.012070803,0.00032124572,0.000046579116,0.000025167,0.000019044648,0.015897563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98608047,0.0033147226,0.00075580995,0.0013680906,0.006090425,0.0023905751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97393054,0.01896923,0.0016990856,0.0024533411,0.0020746025,0.0008732562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108911395,0.00030650568,0.0005590519,0.0010064567,0.0057105646,0.0052712406,0.0014498155,0.005470185,0.0045119408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033115316,0.00033914932,0.00066976144,0.00049913954,0.007882504,0.0027253726,0.004928063,0.010693365,0.000543828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009152255,0.00021131716,0.009793715,0.000083640036,0.00005240233,0.006820293,0.01710826,0.0007973073,0.0032741902,0.91325176,0.021357154,0.02715842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023079786,0.0005284059,0.024458716,0.00076972763,0.0004296864,0.009124072,0.015820786,0.01137337,0.024309743,0.62468445,0.28793594,0.00033424617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010312314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019730002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108911395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030987053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004595807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05759853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034465670","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0066","title":"Legal universalism: Persistent objections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011496792284269482,"score_gpt":0.2280273932835177,"score_spread":0.21653060099924823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034465670","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016309164,0.014380479,0.028341297,0.8587789,0.0035943452,0.00009756866,0.00013957685,0.00017089151,0.07818774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7373184,0.006333538,0.012939315,0.22207351,0.014244313,0.00051533844,0.00010754683,0.00023614938,0.0062318947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8949899,0.04769864,0.005444174,0.015716707,0.03221037,0.003940233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71764493,0.23554488,0.010124976,0.021011844,0.012323793,0.0033495866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.120179944,0.00068439636,0.0027393964,0.0032314782,0.0067147086,0.010064338,0.0071229124,0.018014112,0.005744304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24392602,0.0009587996,0.0015863925,0.0023213958,0.11832019,0.022801261,0.0134521425,0.035419445,0.0006514318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014989281,0.000019131585,0.00018793251,0.00006333997,0.000018871151,0.000024678055,0.000618356,0.00012314787,0.000025641302,0.9915957,0.0038132267,0.0034949612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004780889,0.000015152155,0.00019987623,0.00014623816,0.000015824326,0.00004585834,0.00030696875,0.0002518911,0.0001316891,0.97792244,0.020901522,0.0000148088375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033485135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015874148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120179944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012081419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009514335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6355799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036083413","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0006","title":"Choices and Approaches: Antiterrorism Law and Civil Society in the United States and the United Kingdom After September 11","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Civil liberties; Kingdom; Political science; Law; Commission; Context (archaeology); Civil society; Scope (computer science); Counter terrorism; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.05957556204022244,"score_gpt":0.2521517273917206,"score_spread":0.19257616535149816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036083413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11114774,0.04159105,0.0015570187,0.45717964,0.0019840838,0.000107538835,0.00016309954,0.000034435292,0.38623536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88898337,0.008281889,0.0010116722,0.053492352,0.00021082575,0.000074316435,0.00004397048,0.00003889455,0.047862746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97496694,0.011217267,0.0010943384,0.0015568235,0.0043501747,0.0068143667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98536104,0.0058530355,0.0010939842,0.0005617333,0.0033875224,0.0037426946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010124718,0.0005076845,0.00058984343,0.0020946376,0.047926154,0.029797953,0.002077999,0.018305877,0.0057209954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014517559,0.00063350477,0.0007949243,0.0031654225,0.06473985,0.0066768173,0.009627353,0.01161883,0.0005854964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038688202,0.000025946647,0.0023569267,0.00006713849,0.000015114036,0.0006911736,0.06752766,0.00035434487,0.0001257256,0.8976083,0.0220678,0.009121265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054516244,0.000053179538,0.018713987,0.0013070094,0.000030781448,0.00032220417,0.21565966,0.0005056946,0.00026414945,0.08663569,0.6761637,0.00028946417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9482432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.968978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9482432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15679236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11709644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97800136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036896611","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0012","title":"An Object Lesson in Speculation: Multiple Views of the Cathedral in Leaf v. International Galleries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Speculation; Object (grammar); Art; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Finance","score_opus":0.02930546553526868,"score_gpt":0.2058389816630228,"score_spread":0.17653351612775414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036896611","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026041368,0.0045264764,0.0050755832,0.7581634,0.0021319224,0.000035461202,0.00011040061,0.00004245276,0.20387287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6398476,0.0025127789,0.0018036371,0.30907854,0.0069964356,0.00015263325,0.000074120326,0.00012523102,0.039408915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915155,0.00452572,0.00026208488,0.0014545394,0.0012710249,0.0009712233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865122,0.011350954,0.0005151085,0.0005177301,0.0006999752,0.00040408355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013020398,0.0006741301,0.0007633905,0.0013394635,0.012541222,0.013512501,0.004049708,0.029768426,0.008105173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028555922,0.0007478174,0.0012380931,0.0013591284,0.035479844,0.026057528,0.007813988,0.031944357,0.0008879644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029947389,0.000011393359,0.00032718788,0.000025755426,0.0000068641616,0.00056501897,0.015177361,0.000073015086,0.00007811279,0.95270526,0.028661389,0.0023387256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009131781,0.000041531435,0.0005595724,0.00049123773,0.00003398067,0.0004257851,0.022311246,0.0005709677,0.00043823768,0.72518176,0.24978125,0.00007308163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016627839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018367365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98337215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006810156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004729287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06885928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039003416","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0011","title":"Why compare?: Comments on Kevin Jon Heller and Markus D Dubber's The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05712357264414657,"score_gpt":0.3110658969474713,"score_spread":0.2539423243033247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039003416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007908825,0.012667202,0.00014877507,0.96950513,0.016073663,0.00000748615,0.000033720833,0.000020239802,0.0014647145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018570042,0.010120849,0.00059445645,0.95841753,0.020661846,0.00006635769,0.000042491643,0.00010646903,0.0081329355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842627,0.00756501,0.0011196429,0.0016239714,0.0048276563,0.0006011096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91244847,0.066411525,0.0030715351,0.0014523531,0.014119579,0.0024965107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024548514,0.0016643662,0.0020225623,0.0027166798,0.008030183,0.011309536,0.007240821,0.02316176,0.008506657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10175394,0.0011870622,0.0010571757,0.0063135778,0.01241372,0.023612943,0.006184031,0.0295418,0.0061370507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052445575,0.0000039788147,0.000042826003,0.00007771319,0.0000018241201,0.00002696956,0.0005548152,0.000016644488,0.000011186234,0.0059716785,0.99067664,0.002610427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088615,0.000009447214,0.00024293808,0.00071743666,0.0000058761448,0.00009739032,0.002129755,0.000056844285,0.00006104204,0.008162962,0.9884744,0.00003306909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027205717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05014415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027205717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007258756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0105052525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12982649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039123807","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0006","title":"The Natural Law Duty to Recognize Private Property Ownership: Kant's Theory of Property in His Doctrine of Right","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Duty; Law; Doctrine; Public property; State (computer science); Private property; Law and economics; Political science; Property law; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012214894139636926,"score_gpt":0.21932444111470115,"score_spread":0.20710954697506423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039123807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013597172,0.012104837,0.048429266,0.06803865,0.0012485227,0.00005417664,0.00018895733,0.00009806942,0.85624033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89035606,0.0040681367,0.010803953,0.010312872,0.0015129057,0.0001712493,0.000088751585,0.000089435736,0.08259666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976629,0.0012214151,0.0000690954,0.00032496062,0.00045339222,0.0002683221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989519,0.0006102563,0.00008280834,0.00015513969,0.00013350532,0.00006637587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026489608,0.00046355376,0.00035419958,0.0010359046,0.003584551,0.0058698165,0.0013673055,0.0059534307,0.004345789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002835853,0.0004266359,0.0005416199,0.0009628191,0.038494386,0.010009331,0.0029463856,0.0067308303,0.0011064686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021745273,0.0000023864027,0.00001295288,0.0000047692038,5.2928925e-7,0.000011047112,0.00033774046,0.000053014104,0.000012888227,0.9970908,0.001837536,0.0006340983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036829542,0.000004367215,0.00007399916,0.000041518913,0.0000018650375,0.000028793176,0.00015762266,0.00026338088,0.000048345337,0.966535,0.0328351,0.0000062623176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045285113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040249834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059534307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047710952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024129488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034616888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039144629","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.300412ra","title":"THE END OF THE ROAD TO SERFDOM?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Rule of law; Democracy; Law and economics; Serfdom; Bureaucracy; Order (exchange); Oppression; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.021419505765335245,"score_gpt":0.25603169860590774,"score_spread":0.2346121928405725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039144629","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011608022,0.49725345,0.0011051454,0.35929236,0.031573728,0.000010542048,0.00009620653,0.000059557777,0.10944817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07771857,0.49738342,0.0011892079,0.17389144,0.0419281,0.00005530391,0.00024962644,0.00022129201,0.20736311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988863,0.00036573014,0.000029257697,0.00018768272,0.00030410851,0.000226858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990772,0.00042504285,0.00006295178,0.00006212966,0.00020037785,0.00017230168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013175807,0.00038499758,0.0004742445,0.0008705702,0.0023908732,0.007539766,0.0008010944,0.00445374,0.018739147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032782867,0.00022930287,0.00032795614,0.0011726415,0.0060864086,0.010141798,0.0020207758,0.00534392,0.004693959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017191558,0.00001675697,0.00013107448,0.00036587744,0.0000049404716,0.000064221575,0.001105084,0.000049714505,0.00005763877,0.3109453,0.6269251,0.060317002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001608612,0.0000038846215,0.0001598432,0.00041172103,0.0000012101344,0.000059269198,0.0005249823,0.000017668453,0.000025289082,0.022523364,0.9762675,0.0000036535228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010534084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015855648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018739147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005577005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006074435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06268865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039683354","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.261112","title":"HUGO PREUSS’S CONCEPT OF THE <i>VOLK</i>: CRITICAL CONFUSION OR SOPHISTICATED CONCEPTION?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Democracy; Politics; Mythology; Political science; State (computer science); Doctrine; Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.019096488003876543,"score_gpt":0.27489956550357,"score_spread":0.25580307749969344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039683354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024799202,0.08022793,0.017598838,0.5870445,0.004958606,0.000056024284,0.000118124124,0.00012137734,0.28507546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8576744,0.018622505,0.0061803805,0.07985514,0.008897656,0.00017032084,0.000118154465,0.0002385391,0.02824283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949439,0.0030673137,0.00009091799,0.00062742684,0.0007226413,0.0005476681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975696,0.0016062411,0.0002477589,0.00018763277,0.00021967855,0.00016911035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004308348,0.0010007023,0.000637078,0.0028504138,0.006706185,0.0124290865,0.0031378132,0.007057972,0.0029222406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006758875,0.00043546635,0.00036017364,0.0024293833,0.057046253,0.01939789,0.004506893,0.011362234,0.0008946736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006649039,0.000004445516,0.000066337205,0.000023792307,0.0000015971898,0.000025707344,0.0081037115,0.000026198959,0.000024590927,0.97972304,0.00946602,0.0025279147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008981895,0.000018991475,0.00041057356,0.00029023513,0.0000036559,0.00014021002,0.008254601,0.00022973651,0.00013839717,0.6924834,0.29799405,0.000027202579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009391658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008069366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124290865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008050103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003397473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058407843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039981008","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0014","title":"Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); German; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Constitution; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0136201582477239,"score_gpt":0.2739484023916838,"score_spread":0.2603282441439599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039981008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052045077,0.042232823,0.004247187,0.083598904,0.0015382542,0.00010543208,0.000625021,0.00013088877,0.81547636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88558686,0.0101509495,0.0035993098,0.017080195,0.0003346513,0.00007251685,0.00022762205,0.000076850905,0.08287111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919487,0.0011062414,0.00020658254,0.0010490477,0.0031714,0.0025178741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973846,0.00075828034,0.000095610565,0.00014168257,0.0011517936,0.00046804568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00409101,0.0005900906,0.0004957653,0.0035778042,0.016779793,0.0107823,0.0019082422,0.004414001,0.005571964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008601036,0.00043802388,0.00043531612,0.004675545,0.022775674,0.0027283423,0.0029816024,0.004924246,0.0003865687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075290623,0.000004511826,0.00016903832,0.000017687807,0.0000033128556,0.00004391402,0.0030489452,0.00015836261,0.00006488988,0.9807992,0.011269576,0.00441291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041004976,0.00001552057,0.008405839,0.00033888101,0.000036202087,0.00014952067,0.0059087104,0.0011306041,0.00036213725,0.19732876,0.78612113,0.0001617239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98133415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98398083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8315182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1684818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10036744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96444327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040095158","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0001","title":"Fuzzy rules and clear enough standards: The Uses and Abuses of &lt;i&gt;Pierson v Post&lt;/i&gt;","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Style (visual arts); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Literature; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.01067645475033622,"score_gpt":0.17542192271973192,"score_spread":0.1647454679693957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040095158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1235931,0.023958812,0.026577743,0.28727663,0.0011064105,0.000049386344,0.000090525275,0.00006191093,0.53728557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97752315,0.002122659,0.0019905365,0.009265278,0.00017632199,0.0000387668,0.000012107165,0.000030026878,0.008841133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335993,0.008443507,0.0005625006,0.0016040527,0.004921915,0.0011081053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863338,0.0095444415,0.0008118517,0.0012411202,0.0016586038,0.00041023365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014505235,0.00029019185,0.00044690177,0.0015517893,0.008724938,0.010707154,0.0012984885,0.0062875687,0.0012718975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028331975,0.00046895572,0.00035460637,0.0019056303,0.06147733,0.011493853,0.0045407503,0.009370065,0.00018311324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041909884,0.0000023546093,0.00012898861,0.0000096949725,0.0000015339176,0.000025233952,0.0056449845,0.000022841632,0.000018589571,0.9884857,0.0022321362,0.0034237693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000227733,0.00003136933,0.0015356492,0.0003535555,0.000018460047,0.00013859395,0.013159923,0.00068179634,0.00056494074,0.8518747,0.13156489,0.000053266158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06419271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06951086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06419271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013416781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008390108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12763816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040334088","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2418","title":"Unsettling the lawyers: Other forms of justice in Indigenous claims of expropriation, abuse, and injustice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Injustice; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.008375183208198819,"score_gpt":0.18175576992857806,"score_spread":0.17338058672037923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040334088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2497523,0.004721536,0.009288898,0.096670315,0.0010628572,0.000087441644,0.000019498888,0.00007720724,0.6383199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97996956,0.0004716518,0.0006257259,0.004783839,0.00028843532,0.000028975353,0.000003749655,0.000019836849,0.013808256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902806,0.0041843094,0.00025338825,0.0007240657,0.001834619,0.0027230273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435174,0.003309439,0.0005988455,0.00055120606,0.0005463791,0.00064239634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074354783,0.00033230666,0.0005780408,0.0018876359,0.032956865,0.018082162,0.0027595218,0.010118503,0.005195462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015371092,0.00039576698,0.00071157306,0.001475865,0.11287722,0.01423496,0.018691171,0.014718653,0.000391303],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010523779,0.000037776557,0.00065568794,0.000034475193,0.0000053875888,0.0007869069,0.29387957,0.00007524094,0.000145083,0.69634044,0.0017558887,0.0062730215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019935742,0.000065538065,0.0023428146,0.00027539243,0.000025201476,0.0010679107,0.45749637,0.0004572884,0.000403506,0.40102914,0.13674974,0.00006718869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039743118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05659926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008452626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104775755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0790236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040584697","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0053","title":"Preference, pluralism, and proportionality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023434782033723903,"score_gpt":0.17786960044065103,"score_spread":0.15443481840692713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040584697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09132369,0.009110309,0.14389497,0.04967421,0.0009981765,0.000099974706,0.00007809053,0.00007497627,0.7047456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660763,0.0011886379,0.010334677,0.0019655575,0.000510077,0.00007372138,0.00002093251,0.000034817665,0.0197952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878946,0.007103936,0.00038645105,0.0011439961,0.0026714175,0.00079953007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263316,0.0044338694,0.0006749939,0.0007988054,0.0008804462,0.0005786679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009619659,0.000419105,0.00065616204,0.0011798234,0.0041176714,0.0055281087,0.0008437908,0.0017393758,0.004521303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016046401,0.00032800023,0.0006370652,0.0016819839,0.022376867,0.0077099996,0.0042131385,0.0035615137,0.00042234542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008705956,0.000007873162,0.00009229936,0.000013188788,0.000004766205,0.000024667757,0.0007123124,0.00023272779,0.000035268946,0.99414223,0.00086338294,0.0038626762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064238807,0.000005732167,0.000088617475,0.000010173439,0.000002149167,0.000027518048,0.00020507573,0.00029729045,0.000027111786,0.99133563,0.007990304,0.0000038179473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032428196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002844109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009619659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040753675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020442652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050874174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040736168","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0068","title":"Reinventing the night-watchman state?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Language change; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Political science; Private security; Criminal law; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.020689580146145886,"score_gpt":0.2874990188203944,"score_spread":0.26680943867424856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040736168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43159992,0.0027595954,0.0019641398,0.14578527,0.0014158485,0.000035247725,0.00003658018,0.00005820924,0.41634518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95069236,0.00062627974,0.00026608384,0.005518641,0.00009948983,0.0000073986153,0.000009469509,0.000017807732,0.042762488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999212,0.00032709382,0.000010673394,0.00005969947,0.00010269845,0.00028771686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960274,0.00007201432,0.00005451361,0.000032907355,0.000048537873,0.00018939513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086425163,0.00007656536,0.00009196486,0.00019010801,0.0054823887,0.0037638848,0.0003542043,0.0013890378,0.0064236056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001679658,0.0001083932,0.000089472705,0.00022516825,0.007720335,0.003489572,0.0023324492,0.0026245122,0.0005408858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017443113,0.000035207773,0.0037196951,0.000023662733,0.0000018647306,0.0001674519,0.06235041,0.000053873468,0.00029127247,0.8967211,0.017273977,0.019344123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010567934,0.00006303385,0.006938424,0.0001638853,0.0000052621695,0.00021734931,0.13746506,0.00028701304,0.0005447616,0.057646282,0.79663503,0.000023379493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03143119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06617313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036800015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050254017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062496483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040771557","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.169","title":"LAW AND ECONOMICS IN THE LEGAL ACADEMY, OR, WHAT I SHOULD HAVE SAID TO DISCIPULUS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sketch; Normative; Perspective (graphical); Audience measurement; Empirical legal studies; Dominance (genetics); Legal research; Legal realism; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.030816844686630884,"score_gpt":0.22232812137493319,"score_spread":0.1915112766883023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040771557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010295573,0.019171871,0.0023759748,0.9514085,0.0075123734,0.0000053925883,0.000052889747,0.00004212253,0.018401332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19484822,0.0668873,0.012531654,0.5695349,0.09235561,0.00011999112,0.00013954422,0.0002203433,0.063362464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952798,0.0023556256,0.00018807605,0.0007183824,0.00092354795,0.00053462025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97972405,0.012418501,0.001133638,0.001961368,0.0026097107,0.0021527652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01012349,0.00046203684,0.00084067386,0.0018876167,0.005345385,0.015963953,0.0024627366,0.010049517,0.011767646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030149678,0.00032244573,0.00069645164,0.0017632943,0.03221021,0.026610112,0.005727104,0.012346736,0.0034423003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011345457,0.000020005371,0.00030570818,0.00011950853,0.000007750807,0.000023430486,0.0008169636,0.00015943265,0.000026827855,0.86957425,0.11771605,0.011218751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009034201,0.000011880048,0.00039964225,0.0004801388,0.000006225403,0.000044226446,0.0015330215,0.0003977743,0.0000679874,0.6903363,0.30669338,0.000020529857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008385265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077461894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015963953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074662175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00978497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054171383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042851964","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0035","title":"Constitutional rights in the balance: Modern exclusionary rules and the toleration of police lawlessness in the search for truth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawlessness; Discretion; Exclusionary rule; Political science; Law; Balance (ability); Human rights; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04441986453828719,"score_gpt":0.2839734639625264,"score_spread":0.23955359942423918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042851964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16274114,0.009629585,0.16746582,0.19631918,0.0011212442,0.00017682901,0.00019053182,0.00018891419,0.4621668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98028576,0.0008592107,0.008015716,0.0055952608,0.0006991418,0.00012351843,0.000028217446,0.000052400595,0.00434082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96577924,0.016280815,0.0025158704,0.0055114515,0.0072246436,0.0026879772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94570065,0.035278037,0.004864986,0.0085968515,0.0037132304,0.0018461794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03722671,0.00039900898,0.0011937165,0.0022733891,0.008783193,0.015011399,0.0025584628,0.00986242,0.0026946627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06369503,0.00077573064,0.00087633904,0.0014441472,0.11089819,0.019208243,0.009761929,0.012046411,0.0004930696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013173205,0.0000074229843,0.00020152006,0.000012981037,0.0000054290676,0.000047756326,0.0020843544,0.00011567545,0.000121546465,0.9948397,0.0003488517,0.00220143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023006216,0.000014265758,0.00022197895,0.000071717586,0.000008309121,0.000049364346,0.00047543435,0.0002080885,0.00017186574,0.98860955,0.010128111,0.000018394672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056431927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041168714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03722671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005967028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077416124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19687599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044511085","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1117-1","title":"AUTHORITY TO PROSCRIBE AND PUNISH INTERNATIONAL CRIMES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Jurisdiction; Dignity; Punishment (psychology); Law; Criminal law; Political science; International law; Criminal jurisdiction; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01117392381419972,"score_gpt":0.2494568161555595,"score_spread":0.2382828923413598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044511085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024614625,0.00072940096,0.0064671803,0.01212032,0.0002353968,0.000041076466,0.000032898362,0.00006199085,0.9556972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9150535,0.00079823064,0.0025808099,0.0039393487,0.0002460282,0.000048049613,0.000036548223,0.00004720962,0.07725046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944106,0.0014296088,0.0003960929,0.00071665103,0.0019591479,0.0010879018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438816,0.0021993618,0.000821552,0.0009533164,0.0012084717,0.00042906526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054306947,0.00045770037,0.00029455777,0.0013778284,0.00496096,0.0072602164,0.0010025238,0.0035562667,0.0071803755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010973893,0.0003540473,0.00033149694,0.0007177804,0.018478785,0.003217813,0.0049041836,0.004846072,0.0011529333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004354856,0.000012371828,0.001133255,0.00001683973,0.0000053571625,0.00010301625,0.0055017057,0.0001420616,0.00021681131,0.98138833,0.0035422363,0.007933537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003671609,0.00011583123,0.00801514,0.0007142246,0.000070646216,0.001113156,0.010802916,0.0015534522,0.0018715368,0.32389295,0.65171427,0.00009910831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015951658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04144849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015951658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003553642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064938474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031717658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044755740","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.75","title":"RETHINKING THE DICEYAN DIALECTIC","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Constitution; Constitutional theory; Political science; Sovereignty; Parliament; Ideology; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03223350373744688,"score_gpt":0.23427174905547754,"score_spread":0.20203824531803066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044755740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02943203,0.017998343,0.04195763,0.23946996,0.0024195903,0.00006412612,0.00011804467,0.00008819697,0.66845214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88334906,0.007248173,0.014198308,0.03529861,0.0023235364,0.00021984299,0.000058926555,0.00021661409,0.05708688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819666,0.009868191,0.0005806487,0.0024564455,0.003529669,0.0015984441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029326,0.006970214,0.0003390515,0.000645932,0.0013068971,0.0004446239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015607563,0.00076314714,0.0011978425,0.005364133,0.015147038,0.016379347,0.00236998,0.009470094,0.0041561197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017851137,0.00062942586,0.00064886065,0.003074237,0.05931312,0.019306248,0.008311171,0.011719942,0.00088307576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002193472,0.0000013022653,0.000013104711,0.0000044326343,5.495171e-7,0.000008649228,0.0011820635,0.000024900339,0.0000064852425,0.99711144,0.0011128646,0.00053191866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015881358,0.00000780447,0.00012439539,0.00011065115,0.000004355818,0.000041449726,0.0019730423,0.0003755244,0.00012096686,0.82044107,0.17677031,0.000014437943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017501421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015417384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022955319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022955319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0115602845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16655332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044835123","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1117-3","title":"TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND CRIMINALIZATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Relation (database); Acknowledgement; Sociology; Computer security","score_opus":0.010797130379867416,"score_gpt":0.2385564415872736,"score_spread":0.2277593112074062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044835123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3221626,0.006220206,0.022820612,0.013149296,0.00011462563,0.000047404534,0.00010208888,0.000054686057,0.6353285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948776,0.000489786,0.0007066726,0.00018153874,0.000016353328,0.0000125829,0.000013544073,0.0000066594935,0.0036952372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953159,0.0023056278,0.00015472264,0.0006459387,0.00064196537,0.00093573384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746644,0.0008774724,0.0004196751,0.00039331883,0.0004977662,0.0003453599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024098724,0.00016500674,0.00037328995,0.0013644699,0.004434455,0.0047664805,0.0006758126,0.0011681346,0.0036433102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043662465,0.00019368794,0.00030015042,0.0015809799,0.051152855,0.003905024,0.0063549834,0.001674566,0.00020804968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021309372,0.0000014722879,0.00058247056,0.0000076103643,0.0000018634571,0.000025370426,0.0036270374,0.00013835233,0.00003414693,0.99353975,0.00026153,0.0017782954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014873164,0.00003394781,0.0106676975,0.0001720717,0.00002031405,0.00035104668,0.016251583,0.0012170281,0.00026750859,0.8726461,0.098330304,0.000027518845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03475576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0320064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03475576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007751212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063338927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06910694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045693014","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.231112","title":"COPYRIGHT ORIGINALITY AND JUDICIAL ORIGINALITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Originality; Paraphrase; Copyright law; Outcome (game theory); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual property; Linguistics; Philosophy; Economics; Creativity","score_opus":0.010730204917584035,"score_gpt":0.248677690112529,"score_spread":0.23794748519494496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045693014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08701458,0.0043207393,0.021871122,0.02251193,0.0006531512,0.00014932232,0.00011110618,0.0000625642,0.8633054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642445,0.00108927,0.003342854,0.002181597,0.0010810024,0.00009663376,0.000051138493,0.000038422935,0.02787466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97006613,0.011544096,0.0022250342,0.003433793,0.009515899,0.0032150254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946144,0.02651678,0.006245577,0.009768682,0.009207334,0.002117702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02113902,0.00031727125,0.00070345873,0.0025909129,0.005723719,0.01206422,0.0016293158,0.006103428,0.008165775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07769922,0.0003873011,0.00074431504,0.0021742801,0.03771857,0.008419655,0.0061412696,0.0051670154,0.0010650768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007836276,0.000008933654,0.00029912064,0.000023016093,0.0000045707816,0.00007218852,0.0010094235,0.00010597939,0.000110016,0.9935452,0.0009650353,0.003848821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047849793,0.000051984913,0.002440909,0.00016727234,0.000019327259,0.00028929533,0.00083374727,0.0005395844,0.0005622354,0.9427988,0.05221411,0.000034824883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024659738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025726822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02113902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040454445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00513634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11179519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045988882","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0006","title":"A New Approach to Old Cases: Reconsidering Statutes of Limitation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Principal (computer security); Maximization; Political science; Rules of evidence; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Economics; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.06766223257713491,"score_gpt":0.2926820225917903,"score_spread":0.2250197900146554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045988882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013854834,0.008475616,0.34854323,0.46030977,0.00705861,0.00021687915,0.00029625467,0.00027825416,0.1609666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49431962,0.006918509,0.3082254,0.11353414,0.016758505,0.00076576346,0.00021570717,0.0005715968,0.058690675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728573,0.014678264,0.0017329521,0.0031132228,0.006273222,0.0013449795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94602203,0.036601312,0.0019960098,0.006549878,0.0072265286,0.0016043086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04144829,0.00085225597,0.0018696534,0.0038979833,0.008412799,0.012347271,0.009161079,0.014688934,0.006808686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0709488,0.0007601583,0.0014984224,0.0029240418,0.046409152,0.033123724,0.0059218016,0.025180327,0.0010966338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047172916,0.0000071651043,0.00010800063,0.000017225704,0.000003400905,0.000069621274,0.0007550388,0.00023849164,0.000039317456,0.9885145,0.005364438,0.004878064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010260747,0.0000105437175,0.0001110897,0.000113670554,0.000007186817,0.00009527804,0.0004446337,0.0013389833,0.00008700683,0.9410196,0.056739062,0.000022769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014821569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035724636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04144829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01181179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013498835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21920216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048126926","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.411","title":"EQUALITY UNDER AND BEFORE THE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Anachronism; Normative; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Law and economics; Extant taxon; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07866532542565509,"score_gpt":0.29018785071594355,"score_spread":0.21152252529028848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048126926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04109832,0.010820166,0.022737723,0.066094436,0.0016974794,0.000059381127,0.00013187324,0.0000652008,0.8572954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92017746,0.002722046,0.0028066728,0.006963778,0.0013574299,0.00007373468,0.00007210572,0.00005386586,0.06577286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883354,0.003535038,0.00045155606,0.0025907266,0.0028224557,0.002264857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964945,0.0012012539,0.00030467,0.00073101796,0.00069744844,0.00057108194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00639123,0.00034544466,0.000916715,0.00088471593,0.010152344,0.012016727,0.0010019228,0.004552195,0.0070389193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008904787,0.00038125776,0.00040614003,0.00075067446,0.055229884,0.010927516,0.009114309,0.0059894384,0.0009383247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034977904,0.0000016332128,0.000063777785,0.000007615159,9.598297e-7,0.000015854714,0.0014747302,0.000024621708,0.000029600793,0.9957141,0.0007858847,0.0018776413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010332663,0.000029476902,0.00082774466,0.00014857276,0.000010902471,0.00008250477,0.0032393604,0.00016014908,0.00027268892,0.7723145,0.22288604,0.000017727149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043054115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03580579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043054115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012224751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016944315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088697195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050838610","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0031","title":"Is Formalism inevitable?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Scholarship; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.017879355690791746,"score_gpt":0.27723399539297183,"score_spread":0.2593546397021801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050838610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014381904,0.057277534,0.055698518,0.414234,0.0055202446,0.00005555081,0.00025650425,0.00030472458,0.45227107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8590796,0.03173366,0.017115857,0.035700187,0.0053144954,0.00025695088,0.00035205396,0.0003876625,0.050059594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908948,0.0052949036,0.00032102413,0.001202434,0.0015305707,0.00075630884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896248,0.0067074127,0.00050552236,0.0014334065,0.0011148859,0.0006140876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012310483,0.00057862094,0.0008456817,0.0014377355,0.0066619697,0.011502124,0.0016323242,0.003512343,0.00673193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018383887,0.0005675623,0.0008372579,0.0012738821,0.045912277,0.025009913,0.006771861,0.008823277,0.0016708506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035513604,0.0000037354591,0.000045343753,0.000019628613,0.0000018447932,0.000020301408,0.00065981445,0.000062634565,0.00001373877,0.9922036,0.0046622762,0.0023034608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037046964,0.0000029379207,0.000047785838,0.00007496604,0.0000016328569,0.0000279839,0.0004193794,0.00017876326,0.000024826906,0.9557967,0.043416034,0.0000052097325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074269627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039111846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012310483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007653102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007049325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0651049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052860973","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.29","title":"From Author's Right to Property Right","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Property rights; Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Intellectual property; Exclusive right; Copyright Act; Real property; Sociology; Philosophy; Copyright law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01654885660416777,"score_gpt":0.25808075067657127,"score_spread":0.2415318940724035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052860973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010148734,0.0056073037,0.0044009923,0.050741695,0.00192753,0.0000436646,0.000116306306,0.000072874034,0.92694074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6493642,0.006751436,0.004890966,0.04311425,0.004727947,0.00024699233,0.00019012549,0.00023495934,0.29047918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899333,0.0026391107,0.000561353,0.0019251349,0.0039862283,0.00095486856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867813,0.0077053984,0.0007054039,0.0016305563,0.0025828062,0.00059457956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061677876,0.00043218402,0.00049023546,0.001801377,0.006338681,0.0119432695,0.0016044169,0.0076275817,0.013452692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02338027,0.00033584828,0.00048285892,0.0013893328,0.028033487,0.013043097,0.0051975204,0.011313818,0.0036421313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004851429,0.000005404402,0.00011713818,0.000018419101,0.0000015350722,0.000054564574,0.0020782782,0.000026139305,0.000045989364,0.98782504,0.007257118,0.002565575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000183581,0.000032754702,0.00040778975,0.0003801751,0.000009802702,0.00022087138,0.0017242255,0.00015420883,0.00040422461,0.49235415,0.50426924,0.000024143052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077594277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006596311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013452692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074719335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008864435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054212928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056240794","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0000","title":"Investment Rules and the Denial of Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Investment (military); Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.013901353388218489,"score_gpt":0.1779326313506829,"score_spread":0.16403127796246442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056240794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017791132,0.013833182,0.034164768,0.104537226,0.0018940493,0.00007814418,0.00011856913,0.00015259915,0.8274304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89433223,0.0052940804,0.0081091095,0.021142974,0.0015173479,0.00031967025,0.00014678344,0.00017128054,0.06896655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875931,0.0052374164,0.0006145528,0.0024521179,0.0027901244,0.0013126767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957054,0.0025039203,0.0003142994,0.000917274,0.00038599104,0.00017307705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010580877,0.00052617956,0.0006803734,0.0013321248,0.005001708,0.01125137,0.0015916032,0.004953548,0.004425623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011696763,0.0004170034,0.00070597586,0.0011934356,0.062265385,0.0140875485,0.0064977743,0.008731782,0.0008409574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7071385e-7,9.311244e-7,0.000012483532,0.0000028657194,6.9554346e-7,0.0000041113394,0.00026188252,0.000034858247,0.0000069755324,0.9984433,0.0005288122,0.0007021753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067339142,0.0000037601462,0.00004305074,0.000028181767,0.0000017051157,0.000014345736,0.00022958609,0.00009088367,0.000053013337,0.9475668,0.051957045,0.0000050015483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004696194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024123015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008412719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052052774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06103885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056543025","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0010","title":"Recognizing Quebec in the Constitution of Canada: Using the Bilateral Constitutional Amendment Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; French; Political science; Negotiation; Constitutional law; Constitutional amendment; Population; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.023199667368727937,"score_gpt":0.21659417120346544,"score_spread":0.1933945038347375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056543025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046499547,0.0074729417,0.019976946,0.097794116,0.0012170713,0.0004100721,0.0008364777,0.00020623008,0.8255866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84285796,0.0034079764,0.020322643,0.01700202,0.00022676503,0.00024048619,0.00034227798,0.00006203533,0.11553784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920169,0.002044604,0.00025310327,0.00083333877,0.0027386895,0.0021133628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946989,0.0018844975,0.00018003887,0.00037421242,0.0022945763,0.00056780584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008734725,0.0004382319,0.00034373344,0.0021187621,0.017366255,0.013748701,0.0019424009,0.005679737,0.004920035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014415181,0.0003782252,0.00036377003,0.0028926933,0.0115937395,0.0031680218,0.003556718,0.0049866824,0.00035706986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009032321,0.0000061186074,0.00065146317,0.000021954978,0.000005598933,0.00017547047,0.004066121,0.0006614802,0.00021904985,0.97039044,0.014106188,0.009687094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057971312,0.000022317961,0.006933972,0.00043282306,0.000057317895,0.0001476734,0.0090179825,0.00293182,0.0006972216,0.13320155,0.8463383,0.00016107658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98327535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8910651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10893487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20014805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79038155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059400667","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2873","title":"The importance of being earnest: Two notions of internalization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Sanctions; Preference; Social psychology; Internalization; Opposition (politics); Incentive; Perception; Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.026071572934634694,"score_gpt":0.20431550783055463,"score_spread":0.17824393489591994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059400667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41632617,0.0015757455,0.07087405,0.010095185,0.00023666034,0.00017801543,0.00011361348,0.000094625466,0.500506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99217075,0.00020812747,0.004484551,0.00041299104,0.000028762035,0.00009323923,0.000023424638,0.00003070121,0.0025475328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851804,0.007750546,0.0006068625,0.0017036931,0.0035817164,0.0011767697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819287,0.007836699,0.0028725343,0.004775804,0.0014433037,0.0011429782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006187569,0.0006262837,0.00069482974,0.0011849469,0.0028066037,0.0061533656,0.0018197275,0.0027588974,0.0046931305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016301256,0.00058974815,0.0009805771,0.00093318213,0.036441892,0.011115213,0.009103953,0.00587661,0.00038177805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012390783,0.00020412626,0.0070417286,0.00018025697,0.000047013244,0.00016776292,0.047601778,0.00058365037,0.0017125979,0.92261046,0.00049997994,0.019226704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008748139,0.00040971956,0.031991035,0.00047569658,0.00012145925,0.001167202,0.03689494,0.0035976258,0.0025911392,0.8828979,0.039579906,0.00018588766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019334401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013385708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006187569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026714874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018152965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032723427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060105243","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0014","title":"Private Law and Public Right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Canada Council for the Arts","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Slavic languages; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Classics; Law; History; Art history","score_opus":0.02653600188505005,"score_gpt":0.2331907195830554,"score_spread":0.20665471769800536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060105243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024818592,0.005156762,0.000641751,0.038434166,0.00019526455,0.000011390207,0.00036401508,0.000041415457,0.9526734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5567976,0.009106576,0.00073390396,0.01205288,0.0008577011,0.000049455106,0.00040796128,0.00010491105,0.41988903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998323,0.0002851839,0.00003655509,0.00019545709,0.00056840613,0.00059143733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976318,0.000933643,0.00017060248,0.00035091926,0.0004546979,0.00045833885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012241423,0.00024014413,0.00031205692,0.0010413632,0.005933966,0.008867096,0.00069142453,0.0038317132,0.075308494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059133503,0.0002214472,0.00019435097,0.0018509977,0.01282742,0.0062773046,0.0027574636,0.0026362361,0.00577849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017460187,0.000004620327,0.00011239749,0.000012787097,9.426541e-7,0.00002489566,0.00051784876,0.000030278848,0.0000117106,0.9428944,0.052171625,0.0042167935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075456755,0.000004393755,0.001427666,0.00020620096,0.0000039728457,0.00007046587,0.0017735916,0.00016479817,0.00007177794,0.5133659,0.4828959,0.000007770558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22194964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23858157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22194964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015899533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013061371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44131547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060291855","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0013","title":"Ernie's Three Worlds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035658198521737815,"score_gpt":0.24481946985963499,"score_spread":0.20916127133789716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060291855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0086573865,0.0051376494,0.004638347,0.09017996,0.0015282353,0.00002397959,0.00007779924,0.00006577075,0.8896909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51395327,0.004914103,0.005577244,0.035937224,0.0006341541,0.00012692541,0.00009774272,0.00017064088,0.43858868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964169,0.0011334623,0.000076979566,0.0006491368,0.0008739794,0.0008495363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815494,0.0005603227,0.00009354305,0.00030649017,0.00026548555,0.00061924465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034292762,0.00055074156,0.00049263856,0.0013404046,0.014381106,0.013548779,0.0009493058,0.003933591,0.015661906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053438237,0.00042080562,0.00045217574,0.0007825046,0.023348046,0.011381051,0.011665005,0.007342524,0.002203001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006060949,0.000006894132,0.00014360504,0.0000070134993,0.0000012996071,0.000055768363,0.0053024124,0.000025611242,0.000021563683,0.9595169,0.02993667,0.0049762577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048868687,0.0000083435325,0.00032505064,0.00012552181,0.0000029499017,0.00016117936,0.008787192,0.00012324365,0.00009827884,0.28319237,0.7071568,0.000014073974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03192009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059030607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03192009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009790192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071105273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07103318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061494529","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.1","title":"ONCE MORE INTO THE FRAY: CHALLENGES FOR LEGAL POSITIVISM","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.028825019273952368,"score_gpt":0.2572214584636875,"score_spread":0.22839643918973512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061494529","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036789968,0.013263924,0.008398489,0.95297563,0.0017110384,0.000010937577,0.00004058253,0.000043598076,0.019876676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72894245,0.021969637,0.021964474,0.19468747,0.016133036,0.00033299034,0.00011988692,0.0002753598,0.015574582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96035236,0.025783593,0.0011011442,0.0031601202,0.007889362,0.0017133987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8935705,0.08514787,0.0023033991,0.0062161474,0.008802615,0.00395942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06906184,0.00087019574,0.0024915328,0.00381602,0.014607747,0.018721951,0.005752196,0.014834617,0.0059710257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073806986,0.00070396706,0.0012640926,0.0026027234,0.12996113,0.029748268,0.011402327,0.035047766,0.0012915462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139222075,0.000020420473,0.00009226126,0.00006574621,0.000008395785,0.000033127028,0.002873528,0.0001511049,0.000024337025,0.9847356,0.008928191,0.0030533506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001568409,0.000006184409,0.000050639006,0.000093089395,0.0000018482976,0.000014603742,0.002218501,0.00024005816,0.000023225211,0.9793076,0.01802022,0.0000083204295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015551982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01546404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06906184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01739669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018387148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36523825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068203766","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.105","title":"TAKING BRITAIN'S HUMAN RIGHTS ACT SERIOUSLY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Sovereignty; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law and economics; Right to property; Wonder; Sociology; International human rights law; Coalition government; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042123605801952624,"score_gpt":0.28746042997400234,"score_spread":0.24533682417204972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068203766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011009976,0.024390766,0.0011665769,0.6415758,0.008223787,0.00006953275,0.00026024837,0.00011896655,0.31318438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22598115,0.00983823,0.0027053559,0.42933595,0.0038535441,0.00028795275,0.00029097786,0.00013170608,0.32757518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897912,0.0028246113,0.00040186496,0.000717099,0.0045620035,0.0017032229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99357384,0.0038433606,0.00024507858,0.0004234211,0.0010259126,0.0008883153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050030225,0.00064812676,0.0007590381,0.00084713864,0.007835048,0.011557817,0.0012551466,0.023884894,0.0068487315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011256421,0.00055839453,0.0004450179,0.001143516,0.012860218,0.0043896595,0.0031911174,0.016346145,0.0026344364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041947707,0.00005656607,0.00096198363,0.0001666077,0.0000135588025,0.0007146003,0.010693203,0.00023528021,0.00067674415,0.4706837,0.4904045,0.02535142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024949251,0.00003424772,0.0038949018,0.0002540052,0.00000992178,0.000103014696,0.0021123572,0.00011590862,0.00014072962,0.038255513,0.95501554,0.000039038936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2161216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3084277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2161216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0132805845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019650355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42972732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069530579","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.377","title":"NAZI LAW AND THE CONCEPT OF COMMUNITY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Nazi Germany; Power (physics); Law; Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); World War II; Rule of law; Politics; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.024751558967417382,"score_gpt":0.17931802139015493,"score_spread":0.15456646242273755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069530579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06348726,0.021122502,0.023543177,0.06316648,0.00084817444,0.000107454995,0.000067318884,0.00006632407,0.8275913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658202,0.0026209718,0.0036258877,0.003954124,0.00042402124,0.00012813718,0.000029402914,0.000026948019,0.023370318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935789,0.0034698376,0.00019955638,0.00081798993,0.0011057212,0.00082796847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973024,0.0011059821,0.0003917647,0.00034001176,0.00037785748,0.00048198545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052712234,0.0004338994,0.0004860513,0.0024635284,0.0134816,0.009366618,0.001351765,0.004904542,0.004038937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004773086,0.00029516136,0.00045171697,0.0021216988,0.08932157,0.014404747,0.01099421,0.0047927215,0.00057556847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001331006,0.000001696768,0.00003253237,0.000003195458,4.395291e-7,0.0000071733157,0.0012682569,0.000021151336,0.000009235718,0.9975805,0.00040766207,0.0006668086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010875639,0.000010324715,0.00016379768,0.00005054799,0.0000018097805,0.00004366399,0.001608049,0.00018536314,0.000036712143,0.9267033,0.071177654,0.00000803255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01072079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007806782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010118169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00571492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073412836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069585775","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614-03ra","title":"List and Pettit on group agency and group responsibility","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Group (periodic table); Criminal liability; Liability; Law and economics; Political science; Criminal responsibility; Sociology; Law; Criminal law; Social science","score_opus":0.012579742963598714,"score_gpt":0.2079142936178357,"score_spread":0.195334550654237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069585775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015391827,0.0124184685,0.013844505,0.25773787,0.00107717,0.000079685655,0.00010300129,0.00003617969,0.69931126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7966112,0.00972161,0.0054412615,0.050056793,0.0014341823,0.00029585214,0.000056059227,0.000058994465,0.13632415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690646,0.0013913269,0.00008427062,0.00036228498,0.0009025063,0.00035321864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996318,0.002416838,0.0002482801,0.00025396293,0.0005566116,0.00020636921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003004573,0.00036829076,0.00037054022,0.0011850885,0.007506168,0.004528724,0.0011597931,0.0076952614,0.008495467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068438197,0.00023340742,0.00040020436,0.0012591874,0.024607273,0.006328724,0.0043803626,0.004482789,0.0010338485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031432435,0.000003888372,0.00010686712,0.0000131208135,0.0000010975942,0.000035356705,0.0013738725,0.00006925816,0.000013723443,0.9851656,0.011486423,0.0017276874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013848667,0.000020969674,0.00094777014,0.00023729338,0.000008572729,0.00010723758,0.0024408475,0.00039167824,0.0001400286,0.7216764,0.2739953,0.000019950106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016691487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01845864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016691487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062520807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036218714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045362234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071745665","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0045","title":"Person, place, or thing?: Property and the structuring of social relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Property rights; Intuition; Structuring; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01396040738108468,"score_gpt":0.2380048575908833,"score_spread":0.22404445020979863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071745665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.178613,0.0116263535,0.13601579,0.089939006,0.0003916347,0.000118499454,0.0001866683,0.00019978646,0.5829092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98609805,0.0009902109,0.005943467,0.001100391,0.000102504906,0.00005612072,0.00002628289,0.000022452152,0.0056605157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653095,0.0022480136,0.00010148123,0.0004081517,0.0003692483,0.00034222688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978258,0.0011507547,0.0002876662,0.00035334416,0.00016009204,0.00022234846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036525698,0.00025375132,0.00047813452,0.0012700054,0.00552291,0.007117543,0.0010451474,0.0024077913,0.003173817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039883456,0.00034194053,0.0004402731,0.001443281,0.06664536,0.011967214,0.0052427175,0.0023861807,0.0004585836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003712969,0.0000028409304,0.0001664997,0.000007518795,0.0000016073684,0.000025097906,0.0032059487,0.00010243066,0.0000249464,0.9944429,0.00035558065,0.0016609378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009571071,0.000008022611,0.0005128376,0.000030725667,0.0000024773806,0.000037050428,0.002417433,0.00028787137,0.00005101615,0.9739396,0.022697054,0.00000641413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011142364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00869167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011142364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053268266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037090145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038648963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072706969","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.109","title":"DEMOCRATIC OBJECTIONS TO STRUCTURAL JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE JUDICIAL ROLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Federalism; Law; Judicial activism; Political science; Constitution; Judicial independence; Separation of powers; Democracy; Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.007300103575219185,"score_gpt":0.24305011294563528,"score_spread":0.2357500093704161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072706969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03949143,0.0148005225,0.1320545,0.39121878,0.0038608455,0.00021212357,0.000071268536,0.00026822937,0.41802233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889972,0.0046034832,0.020553995,0.055868138,0.0071647502,0.00047891133,0.000043022723,0.00013692597,0.021178821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.929729,0.035651438,0.002941304,0.007956078,0.019233543,0.004488716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88341326,0.091198854,0.0075406185,0.009659916,0.0069501954,0.0012371468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058066346,0.0005319615,0.0010980493,0.002127882,0.008672517,0.013613093,0.0031363443,0.014552836,0.003413616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09916698,0.0007032881,0.001435861,0.0015446609,0.050014466,0.010822338,0.007066478,0.01722342,0.00084982085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042725383,0.0000056297017,0.00006391848,0.000013270229,0.000003735124,0.000015961466,0.00040359853,0.00016926839,0.000043831096,0.9961183,0.0011400491,0.0020182554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036710157,0.000024506624,0.00018753675,0.00008970573,0.000015850032,0.000052846743,0.00013922452,0.0007449803,0.00031426834,0.9694335,0.02893994,0.00002092735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003121394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035728405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058066346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007907235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010335148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3070879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074105530","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1119","title":"EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE IN CYBERSPACE? BODIN, SCHMITT, GROTIUS IN CYBERSPACE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Extraterritoriality; Law; International law; Global commons; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; The Internet","score_opus":0.008344743393117108,"score_gpt":0.24660782111064702,"score_spread":0.23826307771752991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074105530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14038143,0.015333205,0.029220888,0.25449836,0.0010324606,0.000035958812,0.0000775677,0.000083266656,0.5593369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869294,0.0016579143,0.00079964485,0.0043865447,0.00027743916,0.000022318929,0.000011500903,0.000020681815,0.005894564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972218,0.0013128855,0.000064461834,0.0004228466,0.00048509735,0.00049282366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716955,0.0016553733,0.00024791688,0.0003442315,0.0003033705,0.0002795649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002930401,0.00026017008,0.00036163058,0.0011050397,0.0060961205,0.008788479,0.0007876738,0.003445346,0.004230605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063624335,0.00022445447,0.000302113,0.0012918155,0.04717005,0.014475092,0.005146108,0.004635274,0.0004955239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034591021,0.0000021668009,0.00016615054,0.000009014184,0.0000014231315,0.00003506768,0.004509939,0.00008784491,0.000033826334,0.9905743,0.0017264885,0.0028503404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009013175,0.000010323571,0.0010407531,0.00017187599,0.0000075872636,0.0001172003,0.009695827,0.00032600565,0.00013759917,0.9053914,0.0830767,0.000015684831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133401025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012432253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053385035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00365969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03873372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075608957","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0224","title":"Resourceful impacts: Harm and valuation of the sacred","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Valuation (finance); Adjudication; Prosperity; Context (archaeology); Damages; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Business; Geography; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.019097554529141848,"score_gpt":0.25372563051924807,"score_spread":0.2346280759901062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075608957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16166091,0.008031955,0.16117017,0.055576764,0.0005609153,0.00061632466,0.0003930902,0.00007137306,0.61191845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98489815,0.0012033969,0.007982525,0.0010318371,0.00009201786,0.000118551696,0.00003079835,0.000018345325,0.004624401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98380893,0.008900643,0.00042212266,0.00066640053,0.0049298527,0.0012721437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845381,0.0088233715,0.0015744127,0.001863976,0.002612255,0.0005879199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013559841,0.0010269113,0.0007035512,0.0040149735,0.0032323308,0.0098704975,0.0021143449,0.004908593,0.0039233007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029354218,0.00045003387,0.0010470678,0.0023517814,0.039036717,0.010478975,0.0061659347,0.0052319183,0.00021159746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025471507,0.000036606667,0.0025618216,0.000084932966,0.00003920721,0.00015771526,0.0023997114,0.003941195,0.00013983049,0.97951,0.0010198649,0.010083482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007921721,0.000055133827,0.0024351624,0.00034772753,0.000043083266,0.00012544327,0.0041867774,0.0048374273,0.00028491908,0.97532517,0.012309027,0.00004220164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023912845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026592609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023912845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015428419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008468174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11194152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076505528","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0211","title":"Moral rightness and the significance of law: Why, how, and when mistake of law matters","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Culpability; Law; Action (physics); Criminal law; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of law; Strict liability; Liability; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.01804449367545182,"score_gpt":0.18566222737401747,"score_spread":0.16761773369856564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076505528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39173248,0.009293469,0.11793902,0.19924378,0.0013909407,0.00018370803,0.00016203822,0.00014620044,0.2799084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889381,0.0006383143,0.0046489327,0.0033078913,0.00023368,0.0000460407,0.000015956248,0.000028204786,0.0021428422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835576,0.008371498,0.000943585,0.0023413817,0.0033024193,0.0014834704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527379,0.03049198,0.008372706,0.0028309552,0.0036341415,0.0019323027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014814296,0.00048382624,0.00088187,0.0014773816,0.002801637,0.007886867,0.0015929989,0.006847895,0.0043408363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068044275,0.000432374,0.0008665443,0.00083787204,0.042599794,0.01548931,0.0052650836,0.006276665,0.00051033427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004919867,0.000057927147,0.0037542093,0.000096019154,0.000037009824,0.00028608646,0.0061071543,0.0006923154,0.0005451978,0.9788563,0.0011960889,0.008322507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017650365,0.0000305652,0.0033602777,0.00010828402,0.000020061634,0.000126667,0.0020294941,0.0015701959,0.00038071725,0.98699576,0.00532783,0.000032407846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041123168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022646808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014814296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004212356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00309046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07834643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076998095","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0059","title":"Access to justice and beyond","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Tribunal; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.018811540854771994,"score_gpt":0.2066464900329916,"score_spread":0.1878349491782196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076998095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011790264,0.017716315,0.0057473714,0.076740324,0.00069571816,0.000019857553,0.000073482515,0.000036328365,0.8871804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593934,0.009316233,0.001303842,0.0243872,0.0024061617,0.0000764538,0.0000675948,0.00007960726,0.10296947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943481,0.0019364941,0.00014562081,0.00082183117,0.0014711333,0.0012769183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957898,0.0018795104,0.00025901909,0.00052641385,0.00062904967,0.0009161706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004116262,0.00028639226,0.0005565295,0.001648308,0.009134684,0.0110593345,0.0012259224,0.005563848,0.016987205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008325009,0.00020897413,0.00040967096,0.0012717745,0.030516664,0.010273638,0.010778338,0.0055929953,0.0014009131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031670515,0.000005094599,0.00007278032,0.000008823581,0.0000013977732,0.000023990562,0.0013751995,0.000026541053,0.00001997483,0.9909402,0.0033305155,0.004192392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005313094,0.000014989079,0.00047905283,0.00025130884,0.0000035904625,0.00008817412,0.0014521106,0.00008097195,0.000053692696,0.7239297,0.27363047,0.000010575835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015419122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011596471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016987205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00802817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071967617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0582487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078039457","doi":"10.2307/825939","title":"Rethinking the Process/Substance Distinction: Baker V. Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Human rights; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021476845913563917,"score_gpt":0.2455718296829147,"score_spread":0.22409498376935078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078039457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05518059,0.018258676,0.007419421,0.6584543,0.0027242796,0.00044757273,0.0005525526,0.00024047015,0.2567221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67369044,0.007183457,0.008485372,0.2684237,0.00080978224,0.00018687974,0.00016247855,0.00016870012,0.04088922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9570218,0.005213598,0.0016276636,0.003266509,0.025658196,0.007212324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94587845,0.025527734,0.0020005538,0.0013928135,0.020672802,0.004527631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02366749,0.00045713765,0.0007011126,0.003894693,0.019035878,0.016327465,0.004474032,0.017541701,0.0025409914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07170119,0.0009834245,0.00071316067,0.003946102,0.017421732,0.0064327484,0.0048796786,0.013737785,0.0003691396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007254874,0.000024484325,0.0047503253,0.0002670988,0.000051587383,0.0009963616,0.012656649,0.00055434403,0.0011623574,0.79682416,0.14786355,0.034776457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046014762,0.00014847395,0.02615889,0.0019117779,0.00056430965,0.00063279236,0.015050755,0.0029596982,0.0043151476,0.1763933,0.77079314,0.0006116251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9738366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095835045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095835045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28157917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69533515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079831649","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2419","title":"Blaming the victim: Canadian law, causation, and residential schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Blame; Tort; Notice; Law; Damages; Prison; Supreme court; Criminology; Political science; Attendance; Estate; Sociology; Liability; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.005574235348561375,"score_gpt":0.20721737809004726,"score_spread":0.20164314274148587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079831649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12946807,0.020338167,0.0049486137,0.31128785,0.001257761,0.00014774817,0.0001715212,0.00010770991,0.5322726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9155708,0.008455791,0.0021646253,0.032779038,0.0002301964,0.000048547376,0.000055620465,0.00003771751,0.040657766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919739,0.0011288463,0.00025772274,0.0007365065,0.003061459,0.0028416782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99333525,0.0022464225,0.00068386644,0.00032710994,0.0025967895,0.000810549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00718976,0.0004363115,0.0005423638,0.0026016333,0.04318563,0.00811943,0.0038169788,0.008647603,0.006099016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017783204,0.00069307914,0.0006344289,0.0026036222,0.02836899,0.0037693027,0.0064452374,0.01032307,0.00026747744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011121462,0.000020681155,0.005881338,0.00008729499,0.00001500648,0.0011030539,0.03392087,0.00024837334,0.00016973731,0.91753584,0.022894537,0.018112175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006612956,0.000065840475,0.04592478,0.0014642376,0.00021882205,0.0018027838,0.08747381,0.0013842989,0.001056281,0.1588776,0.7013424,0.00032296777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08822092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08822092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16066514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6400906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079936065","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0010","title":"The Impact of Hot Issue Markets and Noise Traders on Stock Exchange Listing Standards","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Stock exchange; Business; Capital market; Mandate; Incentive; Public interest; Market maker; Primary market; Accounting; Finance; Economics; Stock market; Corporate governance; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.015397347305828554,"score_gpt":0.2118321612226256,"score_spread":0.19643481391679704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079936065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86133784,0.0010765253,0.004891489,0.004133796,0.000053960688,0.00006878338,0.00017059594,0.000056142628,0.12821086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988438,0.000101070436,0.00014794817,0.00011730136,0.00003775869,0.000005891792,0.00001654349,0.0000047491326,0.00072507025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968996,0.0012253602,0.00017196612,0.00021142112,0.0010739912,0.00041769067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93396765,0.041910354,0.019299692,0.0012438705,0.0019728628,0.001605514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040261648,0.00025004701,0.00042310037,0.0010982737,0.00092883914,0.0068932017,0.0005637664,0.0013684005,0.008157954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031408306,0.00017672223,0.0003470716,0.0010992792,0.0041121137,0.0044272197,0.0017986755,0.001688249,0.00026678623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008668482,0.00077898573,0.24358015,0.00023928752,0.00020209054,0.0011585676,0.0033116587,0.019725198,0.002200277,0.66845703,0.0044857534,0.054994065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000303439,0.0008726622,0.39176166,0.00027258886,0.00028834897,0.00049872056,0.009957888,0.039768875,0.0040496266,0.53777754,0.014246888,0.00020179516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023633083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024155453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008157954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019206062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010203015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080641437","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0020","title":"Errors of fact and law: Race, space, and hockey in Christie v York","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Dissent; Law; Economic Justice; Space (punctuation); Race (biology); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Politics; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009558075751939552,"score_gpt":0.20340499353663485,"score_spread":0.19384691778469532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080641437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4165491,0.009614775,0.001409719,0.1636411,0.0008036179,0.00004860078,0.00021371948,0.00002795215,0.40769145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97910863,0.0012749532,0.00014570403,0.0028575782,0.000064834036,0.0000114999775,0.000017350376,0.000017091015,0.016502364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555725,0.0012024244,0.000117778676,0.00045092808,0.0010268773,0.0016448114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940812,0.0033491207,0.00067331974,0.00026977196,0.0007478548,0.0008786378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035549507,0.00023603046,0.00051733974,0.0018340644,0.033863857,0.014076739,0.0018273036,0.0045737145,0.004089481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015745437,0.00047011473,0.0001998461,0.0020943277,0.061036043,0.007172942,0.007162921,0.0071330126,0.0001899732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017837363,0.000010520593,0.0032892583,0.000026734979,0.000006260972,0.0007796547,0.22310801,0.00021622676,0.00004708128,0.75019026,0.01602597,0.0062821903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027102908,0.000024594729,0.016512046,0.00073468924,0.0000542587,0.000675945,0.47882414,0.00055937114,0.00048157707,0.09982385,0.40205157,0.00023083643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9323809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9518725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06999515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06999515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0578203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50785273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082217453","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0018","title":"Willis, 'Theology,' and the Rule of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Politics; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.008257648076468992,"score_gpt":0.23484182789019992,"score_spread":0.2265841798137309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082217453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013025835,0.10636898,0.0035357927,0.34241593,0.007307192,0.000057820333,0.0001663712,0.000077132565,0.52704495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6872363,0.045022752,0.0026731784,0.033880062,0.012097797,0.00018722126,0.00014304148,0.000090747366,0.21866882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974759,0.0014567316,0.00006840392,0.00027521257,0.0004953614,0.00022843032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980958,0.0012709225,0.00017641367,0.00010373406,0.00020678241,0.00014630579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023028178,0.00046778866,0.0003319818,0.0017275047,0.004249116,0.006022665,0.0009568253,0.0030631705,0.0056285174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006357546,0.00027285636,0.00021977289,0.0017640718,0.024820838,0.0061825276,0.0027436332,0.004713396,0.00071707275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000273541,0.000005597836,0.00007861065,0.000025047788,7.447093e-7,0.000028221484,0.0025709681,0.0000446288,0.000008655368,0.97326034,0.021243082,0.0027314245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005272913,0.000009626312,0.00036844672,0.00022831235,0.0000021586236,0.00007067646,0.0027277153,0.00014293125,0.00003433132,0.4889079,0.5074949,0.0000077162595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017899381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012643265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017899381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006562048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047853556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047611237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083022284","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0004","title":"Combating Terrorist Financing: Is Canada’s Legal Regime Effective?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Commission; Money laundering; Convention; Political science; Finance; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Business; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.01222665008477198,"score_gpt":0.20959969081581256,"score_spread":0.1973730407310406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083022284","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04578872,0.016579209,0.0012520087,0.6196085,0.0026191573,0.00026300378,0.0010779777,0.00008069603,0.3127308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66047686,0.024718868,0.0039125383,0.2352145,0.0012698804,0.0001603639,0.0008285108,0.000106050175,0.073312424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97242874,0.0020491264,0.0006371923,0.0012966314,0.014786178,0.00880213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95407337,0.010288364,0.002555042,0.0009908618,0.025006518,0.007085805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01351041,0.00052670116,0.00077293994,0.0039544213,0.020225473,0.02300515,0.0043060887,0.01025994,0.010433619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050332457,0.0006270888,0.00082411885,0.004388616,0.014526927,0.0071373605,0.0028720747,0.008498806,0.00071163883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014191365,0.00019994135,0.025945043,0.00071221637,0.00012682464,0.00079898216,0.007525062,0.00088749896,0.0007068282,0.58913064,0.27545846,0.098366484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002005613,0.00012569517,0.07356352,0.0026815147,0.00031175578,0.00023230001,0.01586144,0.0013467894,0.0019848556,0.03048952,0.87278837,0.0004136887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98824394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15904297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15904297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40835348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.975391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083205220","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614ra","title":"Proportionality and justification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Legitimacy; Deliberation; Political science; Law and economics; Supreme court; Accountability; Duty; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.016665978894505853,"score_gpt":0.2422938532457298,"score_spread":0.22562787435122394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083205220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010396018,0.034773953,0.13469058,0.12732254,0.0035713895,0.00020538329,0.00023714268,0.0001776346,0.6886254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8470102,0.010573912,0.03727277,0.03584483,0.005582531,0.0007592777,0.00019411619,0.00027246523,0.06248992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96969116,0.017122708,0.0014390508,0.0040077916,0.0057884343,0.0019508309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797339,0.013625599,0.0013814174,0.0026846405,0.0021190108,0.00045550577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021490501,0.00086785574,0.0012174979,0.0027020269,0.005677739,0.01215807,0.002324153,0.010572683,0.009997412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03976765,0.0005898527,0.0010759993,0.0025375385,0.079247996,0.019720322,0.0071017593,0.01031669,0.0016992125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001224638,0.0000011816289,0.00001754341,0.000013228728,0.0000013905238,0.000004678758,0.00016116227,0.000027216114,0.000007437045,0.9979406,0.0008078644,0.0010164465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005647192,0.0000049669375,0.00006019755,0.00009735709,0.0000031790519,0.00002877837,0.0001291527,0.00012157399,0.00005029209,0.9572002,0.042291928,0.0000066167586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057092328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031829223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021490501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007847138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008264439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11365396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083521428","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0004","title":"The Rule of Law as Liberal Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitutionalism; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Legitimacy; Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Rule of law; Philosophy of law; Politics; Political science; Originalism; Democracy; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Liberal democracy; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010948889504164151,"score_gpt":0.23674918367656606,"score_spread":0.2258002941724019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083521428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005862743,0.011376405,0.016223563,0.20161869,0.0030750306,0.000047246267,0.00008838627,0.000120822486,0.7615872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71644247,0.006126286,0.008202126,0.058557164,0.0046848296,0.00019283824,0.000127063,0.0002155889,0.20545164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907137,0.004264535,0.00022298454,0.0011714604,0.0025338489,0.0010934458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931722,0.003519882,0.0005162264,0.0011508862,0.0010205379,0.00062025565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00793314,0.00036816334,0.00045399796,0.0008350163,0.005402691,0.01268586,0.0011028491,0.005740544,0.0055526122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014182629,0.0003023559,0.00032083373,0.00078550726,0.04002826,0.009230849,0.0042552114,0.010711903,0.0019003458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021203311,0.000003482392,0.000027629565,0.000005672536,6.363802e-7,0.0000071748073,0.0003001735,0.0000450467,0.000016586886,0.98969835,0.0077254097,0.0021676256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064001238,0.000005754673,0.0001072064,0.000048042013,0.000001889902,0.000018858322,0.00029207533,0.00017957459,0.00006253538,0.8641785,0.1350926,0.0000066115786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009631787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008710977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01268586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006552667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011596061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047543168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087746324","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0026","title":"Basic rights and substantive criminal law: The Incest Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Law; Substantive law; Criminology; Criminal procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.04666004204695751,"score_gpt":0.25993476191343245,"score_spread":0.21327471986647495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087746324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4520828,0.004863359,0.015870277,0.07308187,0.00023628013,0.000092119655,0.00013140276,0.000053156367,0.45358872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983403,0.00071080704,0.0013082466,0.0052903937,0.0001599916,0.00006293033,0.000023914174,0.000010394756,0.0090301605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933896,0.0021088205,0.00022476671,0.0006793594,0.0016026148,0.001994804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907952,0.00552997,0.00088914845,0.0011944836,0.00083141285,0.00075983227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006079864,0.0002900513,0.0006664987,0.0012090921,0.0052781436,0.0044372836,0.0015512996,0.0071576876,0.0029805992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012386024,0.00046182945,0.00076313916,0.0010310762,0.03373321,0.0077891694,0.008018345,0.011480545,0.00033519385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012382049,0.000024301069,0.0006809414,0.000013430184,0.0000034864076,0.00040990577,0.0016339537,0.0001284006,0.00010768658,0.99416566,0.000716216,0.0021035024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058999336,0.00007009458,0.0024965603,0.00011299932,0.00002444875,0.0009862134,0.0022708937,0.00075604685,0.000687253,0.9640132,0.02849762,0.00002565016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012379796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015017379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012379796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003961461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036194096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032153785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088944785","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0009","title":"The law of capture, Newfoundland-style","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Style (visual arts); Law; Corollary; Occupancy; Variety (cybernetics); Seal (emblem); Political science; Sociology; History; Archaeology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.006093123986782072,"score_gpt":0.18610896164325544,"score_spread":0.18001583765647336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088944785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11981368,0.007321788,0.002595555,0.021653183,0.00031802483,0.000043553886,0.0004236281,0.000039553302,0.847791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.803042,0.0022734718,0.00073340675,0.005670656,0.00007117929,0.000038512222,0.00013451677,0.000018045666,0.1880183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987207,0.00009797958,0.000032475604,0.00023357318,0.0002979602,0.0006172083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940825,0.00014901224,0.000073246454,0.000063087806,0.00020730385,0.0000990999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058225647,0.00022193654,0.00018413784,0.00053037883,0.009658716,0.00422682,0.0007306102,0.0014049682,0.0038084306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014205322,0.00025772295,0.00016709848,0.00074347504,0.011704741,0.0015019651,0.0022620761,0.0023059149,0.00031094797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050246028,0.000021677302,0.008468298,0.00006362326,0.000017229348,0.00086232723,0.017357843,0.00048682644,0.00064564083,0.9036726,0.04571946,0.022634279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023711016,0.00003947559,0.04922368,0.00033895834,0.000046723682,0.0005368673,0.010797582,0.00053376175,0.000707888,0.033984303,0.9036856,0.000081420665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9628553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98527884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05434157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05434157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03012484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3942775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089111058","doi":"10.2307/825935","title":"Why Regulators Turn to Tradeable Permits: A Canadian Case Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turn (biochemistry); Economics; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.025377538933273713,"score_gpt":0.2416104488927641,"score_spread":0.21623290995949038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089111058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5098382,0.0030498006,0.0028520369,0.08041617,0.00031104955,0.0005021385,0.0005338726,0.00008963789,0.40240705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9446679,0.0019405084,0.0013954521,0.007639574,0.0000426305,0.00007653771,0.00008266298,0.00004557384,0.044109106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867834,0.0020234864,0.00022331266,0.0008543917,0.0037609607,0.0063544516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859049,0.006212514,0.000712258,0.0005279888,0.00498913,0.0016533462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074459724,0.0007964923,0.0008366713,0.0026935274,0.047818262,0.011337204,0.0036721097,0.017369762,0.008821108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023943568,0.0009027429,0.0013084785,0.006294878,0.014297147,0.004496973,0.0035680977,0.010049437,0.00055248546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004536996,0.000645562,0.04393589,0.00040516787,0.00014513894,0.01767341,0.11917344,0.0063332543,0.0026026126,0.6685099,0.101555586,0.038566276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000550277,0.0002460916,0.051229794,0.00079432176,0.00057339633,0.0030672573,0.3071119,0.009587181,0.0034228382,0.040253233,0.5824983,0.00066540705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15455496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15455496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21612479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089711025","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0015","title":"Formalism in Music and Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Theoretical physics; Political science; Physics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.03416187840239202,"score_gpt":0.2359458338655684,"score_spread":0.20178395546317637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089711025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026866615,0.042045116,0.22783037,0.10010199,0.0019745573,0.00008311227,0.00019108139,0.0005480761,0.6003591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096548,0.012966554,0.038950942,0.00496259,0.0014069645,0.00012901615,0.00009276747,0.00016441946,0.031671964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658066,0.0019607744,0.00016480582,0.00036795126,0.000669678,0.0002562025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639267,0.0021890218,0.00028922752,0.00055156345,0.0003177616,0.00025981758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054768194,0.0004618145,0.00062577415,0.0015311517,0.0050902152,0.008586472,0.0012340524,0.0035753401,0.003513012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008832452,0.00039286638,0.0006719858,0.0014108481,0.047633782,0.008552575,0.0040700664,0.0035112565,0.00062706793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.305268e-7,9.021751e-7,0.00002093023,0.000006688511,6.398075e-7,0.0000063616394,0.00038808622,0.00015165989,0.000010215405,0.99791354,0.00045200269,0.001048133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035618698,0.0000030126969,0.000045153043,0.0000339137,0.0000010427918,0.000016175964,0.00017895013,0.0004351917,0.00002474114,0.97771513,0.021538263,0.000004821531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022879971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013706762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022879971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00959399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007102903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06960964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092671075","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0007","title":"Language and Judgment's Reach: Reflecting on Limits on Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Proportionality (law); Constitution; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Legislature; Common law; Fidelity; Bill of rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.03164118550424202,"score_gpt":0.29693485752345006,"score_spread":0.26529367201920806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092671075","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01785244,0.056582153,0.010162053,0.46718928,0.0038052988,0.000055414308,0.00009115344,0.000055641434,0.44420663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88121945,0.020927474,0.0031618422,0.04902194,0.0037285674,0.00008776339,0.000065203174,0.0001611183,0.04162677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657219,0.015319275,0.0011177431,0.0028716037,0.0109131085,0.004056427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706162,0.020570593,0.0008664601,0.0010603621,0.0058829817,0.0010034414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028722145,0.00056116894,0.00094636495,0.0026896617,0.016933968,0.02305477,0.0035268255,0.0085556125,0.0033320454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057235975,0.00048672446,0.0006384897,0.0020383496,0.08943899,0.02107334,0.007922699,0.012304686,0.00064640626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068942663,0.0000046481696,0.000118379845,0.000073977906,0.0000054183174,0.00012884283,0.03064768,0.0001153633,0.00009487001,0.93973887,0.019911371,0.009153868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014984612,0.000011598351,0.00053395506,0.0009213502,0.00001186362,0.00008335752,0.033394497,0.00015468292,0.00019496157,0.64902633,0.31561542,0.000037065136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22789265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21031988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22789265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033616386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049168736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45313233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093143504","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.467","title":"ACADEMIC SCRIBBLERS AND DEFUNCT ECONOMISTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Economic Growth and Development","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Innovator; State (computer science); Institutional economics; Liberalization; New institutionalism; Coase theorem; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Market economy; Entrepreneurship; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Finance; Law; Transaction cost; Politics","score_opus":0.006765942145678583,"score_gpt":0.17460172609656088,"score_spread":0.1678357839508823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093143504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012011,0.12735552,0.0042278958,0.6750653,0.035119575,0.000025603944,0.0002936218,0.000147433,0.15656403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.070457876,0.18223424,0.0073247566,0.30068138,0.058778312,0.00023618675,0.0005757253,0.00053707097,0.37917444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672085,0.001028747,0.00017648964,0.00058033556,0.0012156076,0.00027801545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99121946,0.004647161,0.00060035253,0.0007879439,0.0021383543,0.00060662295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003685448,0.0011953231,0.0008219782,0.0022812528,0.003901284,0.00729517,0.0013198188,0.006204387,0.01916366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021817818,0.00048257664,0.00036951917,0.005035884,0.01285021,0.008894201,0.0037159368,0.008900151,0.0153832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001727104,0.000014474378,0.00015370247,0.00009494689,0.0000030217338,0.000032585558,0.0006399531,0.00018047058,0.00004424418,0.37372842,0.60719097,0.01789997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062192908,0.0000041002268,0.00012855364,0.0002782134,0.0000013952182,0.0000213776,0.00034660244,0.000106021,0.00003422581,0.0920546,0.9070128,0.0000058326345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004461026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050861645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01916366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00512904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004541276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06410885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093184516","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0009","title":"Sexual Citizens: The Legal and Cultural Regulation of Sex and Belonging (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.008031324265683574,"score_gpt":0.24379840144105672,"score_spread":0.23576707717537315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093184516","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005695668,0.9990074,0.000007742655,0.00038062944,0.00017247211,0.0000043053124,0.000017414513,0.0000011169489,0.00035196543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00058873947,0.9987676,0.00001620837,0.00030954464,0.00013459522,0.0000071790173,0.000023842651,5.9952936e-7,0.00015169187],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932635,0.0001830485,0.00013616093,0.00008367602,0.00021379608,0.0000568957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978382,0.0011663166,0.00046696863,0.000030173234,0.00037193453,0.00012636272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009826396,0.0008001301,0.0018998537,0.0022510847,0.00048528996,0.0021973785,0.0010734515,0.0015243196,0.010640643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037220216,0.00036582447,0.00094596687,0.004507372,0.00078630174,0.002055567,0.0009884269,0.0016950673,0.0014429936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011521728,0.000042474323,0.0008973901,0.15530086,0.00039137335,0.00016394664,0.00032686748,0.00010712499,0.00013179966,0.0014329632,0.12779376,0.7132961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095802556,0.00013986304,0.011424666,0.1996839,0.0014991061,0.0018915808,0.0011337417,0.000076448676,0.00014015812,0.0009369783,0.78291184,0.000065896216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077635436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015203357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010640643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009663132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041869753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03559655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094373958","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.0301-1","title":"SEX, LIES, AND HIV: <i>MABIOR</i> AND THE CONCEPT OF SEXUAL FRAUD","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Sexual assault; Test (biology); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Hiv test; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Poison control; Family medicine; Demography; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Epistemology; Population; Biology; Health services","score_opus":0.006032792113304776,"score_gpt":0.19912697218950715,"score_spread":0.19309418007620238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094373958","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11000837,0.045865078,0.0028323308,0.5901773,0.0011175829,0.000031079664,0.000057453206,0.000020371173,0.24989045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95831376,0.006810893,0.00045483332,0.025117055,0.00070026953,0.000027699418,0.000010765862,0.000008025024,0.008556708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995369,0.0028595522,0.00012371733,0.00016775198,0.0006686344,0.00081121223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662495,0.0019422318,0.00054261176,0.00017546811,0.00032594154,0.0003888774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042480547,0.00029949754,0.0003725054,0.0012755127,0.008196821,0.009716754,0.0011935788,0.00783427,0.0019214858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007733408,0.00026388865,0.00032416102,0.0012358968,0.06419843,0.0064065857,0.004968535,0.0068516745,0.0001600451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059811623,0.0000060799016,0.00046244016,0.000015784313,0.0000018057765,0.000112076814,0.01238547,0.00004348436,0.000020584053,0.98119044,0.0038770596,0.001878917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002809494,0.00003531037,0.003432445,0.0006232077,0.000019267154,0.00078772084,0.05616653,0.0005094515,0.0002453343,0.76599604,0.17209941,0.000057205667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09659595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08235609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09659595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012047359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010611947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19206738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094997892","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0024","title":"My Continuing Legal Education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Nothing; Banner; Legal education; Law; Media studies; History; Political science; Sociology; Art history; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012600813934692104,"score_gpt":0.30020376384300207,"score_spread":0.28760294990831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094997892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002071968,0.02458915,0.0023105305,0.3188845,0.0641106,0.00034553488,0.0010681187,0.00065071177,0.5859689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010000527,0.012782539,0.0020238422,0.05448162,0.02419485,0.00040033608,0.0008550127,0.0002121647,0.8950491],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776125,0.00047171814,0.00015503356,0.0003408698,0.0008934848,0.000377615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163014,0.0007213659,0.00036243838,0.00036589516,0.0019398894,0.0049802572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024773981,0.0005746539,0.0005574814,0.0014294419,0.003331168,0.006674841,0.0017677088,0.006033774,0.3132579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01387452,0.0003028241,0.00045907457,0.0010149799,0.0014355308,0.0044364138,0.0069762715,0.007813874,0.13504425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005881183,0.000048605303,0.00019304441,0.00007941665,9.2756915e-7,0.00014508386,0.00026741537,0.000014903088,0.00008852236,0.0051971045,0.9047983,0.08916073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023387524,0.000007559909,0.00013455877,0.00013468342,3.9496908e-7,0.00013838928,0.000119723445,0.00001260447,0.000018660383,0.00083830976,0.9985904,0.0000023575517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018782977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044608414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3132579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024307093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007961411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97955424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095259753","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.1","title":"Pandectism and the Gaian Classification of Things","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Medical and Health Sciences Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; German; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03745855982522201,"score_gpt":0.3026153306674386,"score_spread":0.2651567708422166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095259753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08367869,0.0070956694,0.051487118,0.027337281,0.0007907947,0.00008922058,0.0001767405,0.00011837111,0.8292262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496958,0.0012843249,0.012658359,0.0030802318,0.00028319677,0.00012295754,0.00010003196,0.000056166813,0.03271901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975031,0.0009718738,0.00009294743,0.0005734854,0.00048801585,0.00037057063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989968,0.00036281082,0.00011689951,0.00021177983,0.0002036894,0.000107987726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018852475,0.00046042245,0.00037816318,0.0020764177,0.0050339205,0.005165584,0.00091298856,0.0024902697,0.00277615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002191741,0.00028767297,0.00051350304,0.0012722409,0.04131958,0.0059711644,0.0040158164,0.004044653,0.0004810427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021820842,9.2995145e-7,0.00005309063,0.0000028231534,4.5825857e-7,0.000007808839,0.00059284404,0.000018591014,0.0000144466285,0.99822265,0.00035338494,0.00073079346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010980277,0.000017167617,0.0007889177,0.00003272342,0.0000052064543,0.00012058941,0.0007748216,0.00028184816,0.00010349271,0.9114677,0.08638311,0.000013476211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078807585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065192524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078807585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052074976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022695689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037783206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098201070","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2325","title":"The stripping of the trust: A study in legal evolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Liability; Economic Justice; Creditor; Business; Externality; Value (mathematics); Distributive property; Welfare; Stripping (fiber); Law and economics; Point (geometry); Inequality; Punitive damages; Service (business); Public economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Debt; Economics; Law; Finance; Microeconomics; Marketing","score_opus":0.010026889588759615,"score_gpt":0.24335590176580496,"score_spread":0.23332901217704535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098201070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77564144,0.0037614598,0.010088027,0.02668131,0.00011522861,0.000079740596,0.00005596098,0.000033036034,0.18354383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995596,0.0005434662,0.000597727,0.0002919707,0.000018119496,0.000008517061,0.000009096764,0.000009825297,0.0029252365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510574,0.002531118,0.00018518785,0.00047566282,0.00082206837,0.000880286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98721075,0.0071777585,0.0017566811,0.0013751683,0.001478563,0.0010010756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005655415,0.00014357537,0.00038679762,0.002308492,0.009993821,0.007107111,0.0014870175,0.0025242453,0.0032166082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019621,0.00033097368,0.00036230413,0.0031038283,0.04481944,0.010072674,0.0053247903,0.003500282,0.00017522335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017558994,0.000027806867,0.004161852,0.000034370183,0.000004888835,0.00042540795,0.08592229,0.0004145814,0.00016912371,0.8967681,0.0008007958,0.01125328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054929766,0.00018501811,0.049591843,0.00055623474,0.000045228957,0.0013580016,0.24599859,0.006596767,0.0014989406,0.43934393,0.25466773,0.00010277334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12819539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10551624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12819539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033082686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010906072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25489843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103142816","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2717","title":"Victim impact statements at sentencing: Towards a clearer understanding of their aims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Normative; Legislature; Order (exchange); Craft; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; History; Business","score_opus":0.0867052643159974,"score_gpt":0.40131605196388676,"score_spread":0.31461078764788936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103142816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10305709,0.009918567,0.14226589,0.08923574,0.00086855417,0.00053318817,0.00035138943,0.00021734377,0.6535523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431674,0.0032716477,0.028419886,0.006077547,0.00037882416,0.00039296236,0.000102402184,0.00008240514,0.01810702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9658171,0.017906338,0.0017787258,0.0011840848,0.010442194,0.0028715213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96303666,0.0216206,0.003535324,0.0020351901,0.008337236,0.0014349531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036998972,0.00071578234,0.0006606269,0.007329065,0.0078161955,0.025792915,0.0027544287,0.009212321,0.002550192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040040817,0.0008977477,0.00066154456,0.0036940586,0.04394628,0.021970052,0.009707926,0.010479158,0.0005742041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069569237,0.000010414021,0.0011984904,0.000069626425,0.0000034323625,0.00007462924,0.018071992,0.00023036847,0.0001416402,0.9700945,0.00094378594,0.009154193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017600307,0.0000779759,0.012955458,0.0025441796,0.00003685267,0.0004852911,0.091604665,0.0024250976,0.001369305,0.75411546,0.13422461,0.00014352307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034729883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06166288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036998972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017949618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02467196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19567162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110221353","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2167","title":"Panel selection on high courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Panel data; Allocative efficiency; Political science; Law; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04291580922159556,"score_gpt":0.2478318461141811,"score_spread":0.20491603689258553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110221353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7938952,0.0015688699,0.022514768,0.0076547908,0.00012639971,0.00033154426,0.0039781122,0.00016289606,0.16976744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98986256,0.0002393728,0.0009980565,0.00047543918,0.00005567052,0.00006383101,0.0004527447,0.000018756673,0.007833473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854547,0.0061826776,0.00034117527,0.0020636697,0.0025316807,0.0034261614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486122,0.03023395,0.009121404,0.004623106,0.003938376,0.0034710155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008838821,0.00027620269,0.0008524672,0.00116745,0.0024850103,0.0035430472,0.0015247624,0.0018378086,0.024995241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053797655,0.00035381955,0.00067494396,0.0023836337,0.004053235,0.0022268104,0.002499034,0.0025752343,0.0017488418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008350322,0.0003013668,0.5127907,0.00025788136,0.00032548592,0.0011896756,0.004866433,0.060371723,0.001471364,0.268411,0.030300638,0.118878774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018839311,0.0003537424,0.73031545,0.0003572123,0.00021912876,0.0002700589,0.0055049947,0.042686056,0.0015986344,0.16692998,0.051419936,0.00015638398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12644781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18145882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12644781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009075924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043956223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2514236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114343904","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0047","title":"Beyond the countertrade taboo: Why the WTO should take another look at barter and countertrade","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taboo; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024467333516138133,"score_gpt":0.1780342202317672,"score_spread":0.15356688671562907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114343904","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075508416,0.030595407,0.021633457,0.64446014,0.0028079413,0.00003670734,0.0001210658,0.00009469091,0.22474203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9211706,0.011541604,0.0040722378,0.035697803,0.0024852976,0.00003278854,0.000043657074,0.00014537781,0.024810715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694806,0.0013056699,0.00010523624,0.00033312538,0.00089662825,0.00041143855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933877,0.003505614,0.0007840948,0.00082167104,0.0011292679,0.00037171564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057697278,0.0003168801,0.0005196329,0.00077859295,0.0039859237,0.010224823,0.0010171802,0.0065752626,0.0035193928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014939603,0.00025373243,0.00036509038,0.0014130655,0.02836322,0.01301246,0.0021384219,0.008678684,0.0006822353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017770717,0.000007273195,0.0004955477,0.000021940894,0.0000034473114,0.000070223585,0.0015583915,0.0002617871,0.00010116305,0.9812133,0.009150214,0.0070990263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019042593,0.00001980358,0.0018998189,0.00025604077,0.000007985613,0.0001492409,0.00387319,0.0010476053,0.00032848644,0.8541131,0.13825239,0.000033315966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01818343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021816881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01818343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005413738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004429604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03927964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121799125","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1203","title":"Savigny’s theory of choice-of-law as a principle of ‘voluntary submission’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Key (lock); Law; Sociology; Reflection (computer programming); Law and economics; Conflict of laws; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02190900661073231,"score_gpt":0.27186577919541177,"score_spread":0.24995677258467947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121799125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026587037,0.0026125133,0.32012093,0.035079747,0.0006420493,0.00026498572,0.00017273925,0.00012915567,0.6143909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9080907,0.0012863799,0.030487293,0.0053677433,0.0006280266,0.0005044146,0.000067661545,0.00009564228,0.05347227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905917,0.004008668,0.0003524292,0.0015517093,0.0024399955,0.0010554555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554956,0.0024145222,0.00041097973,0.0006147823,0.0007386419,0.00027155448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008751235,0.0007501246,0.0007722059,0.0018531742,0.004481712,0.00742256,0.002166067,0.0060346317,0.0049542794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010442194,0.00045094165,0.0013808189,0.0014031176,0.035187818,0.0075027086,0.0043344293,0.005789936,0.0010289041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011898976,0.0000018441065,0.000023204879,0.0000038629864,9.588042e-7,0.0000065939043,0.00017871732,0.00006943657,0.0000088010465,0.9990157,0.0003005245,0.00038928053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005398733,0.000006442799,0.000053671283,0.000014639492,0.0000018948587,0.00002418739,0.00006216834,0.00040034784,0.000044357148,0.9862205,0.013160081,0.000006262484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060898457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048797387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008751235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007881485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060579726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0571844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123071053","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0005","title":"Constructive Trusts from a Law and Economics Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Plaintiff; Unjust enrichment; Express trust; Damages; Law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Wrongdoing; Sociology; Political science; Business; Computer science; Restitution","score_opus":0.009137035967406807,"score_gpt":0.23603158689937292,"score_spread":0.22689455093196612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123071053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02384256,0.01763916,0.046207253,0.08677401,0.0005917892,0.000078909135,0.00021250108,0.00008880093,0.8245652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93149096,0.0077100853,0.004459932,0.004379026,0.0015928834,0.00010758911,0.000055519307,0.000030502715,0.0501735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978678,0.00090869144,0.00007123404,0.0002023429,0.0006553384,0.000294597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954145,0.0029611394,0.0004647291,0.00023665845,0.00064563804,0.0002773131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019572284,0.00038098946,0.00037524768,0.0020179814,0.0020943964,0.00798299,0.001177418,0.0049648453,0.0108532645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005298607,0.00034272773,0.00062035106,0.0013503253,0.012747246,0.0092791235,0.001674071,0.004051566,0.0006832715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.909727e-7,0.0000027950882,0.000030208323,0.000006838031,0.000001005239,0.000017386585,0.00003267984,0.00028018648,0.000008904332,0.99804926,0.00087584043,0.0006939335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024556894,0.0000051994875,0.00009271144,0.00004474672,0.0000020101077,0.000028259541,0.00008476484,0.0010564267,0.000024696505,0.9842296,0.014424212,0.000004893474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070472755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003776149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01319263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01319263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031899107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095719695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129370845","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.467","title":"PROPERTY AND COLLECTIVE UNDERTAKING: THE PRINCIPLE OF <i>NUMERUS CLAUSUS</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Private property; Politics; Property rights; Context (archaeology); Political science; Democracy; Converse; Law; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04223924788035284,"score_gpt":0.2432543048598389,"score_spread":0.20101505697948607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129370845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043411348,0.0027111801,0.15397108,0.049476847,0.0005733331,0.00008072792,0.000092362076,0.00015238466,0.7495307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95959526,0.0005222452,0.015327276,0.00306839,0.00044915502,0.00015936226,0.000038500475,0.000074618256,0.020765213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394715,0.0026873755,0.00028637046,0.00113678,0.0012750986,0.00066729326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956839,0.0021045622,0.0004364486,0.0010061248,0.00045191756,0.0003171164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070640594,0.0003195245,0.000606804,0.0014002735,0.0060572205,0.008510655,0.0015233814,0.004887852,0.004545065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074229846,0.00033678822,0.000953217,0.0008508895,0.06787675,0.011085148,0.0067450507,0.0050316285,0.0008858146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015866918,0.0000014346205,0.000031076215,0.0000035092323,5.28545e-7,0.000006245677,0.0002791373,0.000034696932,0.000016090073,0.99893314,0.00023782002,0.00045481927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005897949,0.000006277005,0.00010712943,0.000028548633,0.0000018267648,0.000034811128,0.00022386582,0.00034231727,0.000083728206,0.9815856,0.017574498,0.0000055889673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005110666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004384089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008510655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060795415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043970644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044110358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131317104","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614-02ra","title":"The work of Lon Fuller: A promising direction for jurisprudence in the twenty-first century","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.011890624605049945,"score_gpt":0.2366738668175516,"score_spread":0.22478324221250165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131317104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059230495,0.28229484,0.0069590267,0.5161594,0.0054689706,0.000021301992,0.000056432305,0.00003777343,0.18307915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5888603,0.20435643,0.011104519,0.11405037,0.013040243,0.00016805987,0.000097061726,0.00017539457,0.06814756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513644,0.003234559,0.0001045154,0.00037125376,0.00083312363,0.0003201085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913884,0.0067945565,0.00029664073,0.00045595202,0.0005548097,0.000509615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006630112,0.0005132449,0.0007443967,0.0026695202,0.006434864,0.009135054,0.0013272188,0.0061521027,0.0049083047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008140032,0.00023827371,0.00036879562,0.0024915056,0.049982045,0.015113429,0.0037854668,0.0067743664,0.00053077453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004320196,0.0000042252655,0.000029250468,0.000035591347,0.000001316249,0.000015772477,0.0014933475,0.000035443732,0.0000090961,0.9819313,0.011749296,0.0046909894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075436437,0.000010542778,0.00012390938,0.0003241348,0.000001930019,0.00005139951,0.0023159126,0.00007651554,0.000041008545,0.6395981,0.35743758,0.000011484202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011824665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015866313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011824665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084865065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075641326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06157422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133791078","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0115","title":"The goals of regulating work: Between universalism and selectivity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Normative; Work (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.010160563250065478,"score_gpt":0.22672867526483892,"score_spread":0.21656811201477344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133791078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20027079,0.019130478,0.12038406,0.13985021,0.0004447818,0.00015109728,0.00013022196,0.00012936121,0.519509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868737,0.0016356135,0.005233172,0.0033352214,0.00012285751,0.000114987895,0.000019210322,0.000031810534,0.0026334627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98305964,0.009817263,0.00057681097,0.0012503408,0.0033793414,0.0019167212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98652595,0.007917418,0.0015346152,0.0016771569,0.0013555271,0.0009893386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018736359,0.00036370743,0.00082935253,0.0018614144,0.0048183217,0.008208633,0.0013151154,0.0035186838,0.00086950825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012744804,0.00045353879,0.0005894323,0.0013788549,0.06900902,0.008702848,0.0096856505,0.0059035337,0.00019227808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054828406,0.000007242445,0.0005441715,0.000029744788,0.0000037090124,0.0000144484475,0.0034271174,0.00016060493,0.00006328475,0.9916756,0.0003390094,0.0037296193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009390632,0.000018314144,0.0015550901,0.00018868099,0.00000806674,0.000041002513,0.004084249,0.00027606566,0.0001707039,0.97840333,0.0152340075,0.000011041593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067528915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006448949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018736359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064179567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009342297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09908855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149087219","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2817","title":"Tribunal administration and the duty to consult: A study of the National Energy Board","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Duty; Law; Principle of legality; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Appeal; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02045605531417109,"score_gpt":0.2159457382052585,"score_spread":0.19548968289108742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149087219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8702494,0.0010716051,0.00054202095,0.008488719,0.000057669582,0.00003768864,0.000039053655,0.000004643217,0.11950923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917339,0.00025404803,0.000110671135,0.0014527068,0.000017133032,0.000021388632,0.000018706307,0.0000060996613,0.006385351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854989,0.0072876643,0.00047910472,0.0008238168,0.002906721,0.003003792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95297855,0.029060833,0.007709378,0.001377206,0.004339131,0.0045349756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0151058575,0.00010097768,0.00037943263,0.0022001036,0.01073734,0.007393277,0.0012845247,0.002620622,0.010482071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052299567,0.00032198647,0.0002886626,0.003154444,0.006626617,0.0047389027,0.0040153265,0.0032175134,0.0009157416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034859055,0.0016364456,0.37651628,0.00017906893,0.00010092724,0.0017311252,0.22239424,0.0005706456,0.00060332316,0.31303936,0.017752925,0.065127045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000797027,0.00030722283,0.43179578,0.000681117,0.00007011932,0.0007117084,0.40672043,0.0011691585,0.00035916755,0.014779522,0.14323165,0.00009451895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121196374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1895842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98899573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011004247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010425179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24098188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151919055","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.707","title":"‘TO HEAP DISTRESS UPON DISTRESS?’ COMPARATIVE REFLECTIONS ON INTEREST-RATE CEILINGS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financial literacy; Skepticism; Economics; Redistribution (election); Politics; Interest rate; House of Commons; Political economy; Law and economics; Public economics; Positive economics; Political science; Monetary economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.04980467333542229,"score_gpt":0.26138788674817104,"score_spread":0.21158321341274874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151919055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06144205,0.025142264,0.0060975826,0.22526589,0.0013822938,0.0000226054,0.00015946127,0.000039736038,0.68044806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560492,0.00851372,0.0007644983,0.01672406,0.0021753537,0.00004429408,0.000053254378,0.00007230152,0.015603375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991033,0.0049362527,0.00027453393,0.00090771803,0.0011895201,0.0016589327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99192894,0.0049785473,0.0006902404,0.000982804,0.0010177752,0.00040176965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012190187,0.00037003032,0.00065352494,0.0013765994,0.004756125,0.010384776,0.0018712798,0.005871712,0.0057633934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020192474,0.0003429644,0.0007539759,0.0016678689,0.045758333,0.013385442,0.0056464286,0.0098346975,0.00048272457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010800152,0.0000033230363,0.00013281206,0.000015560543,0.0000020342995,0.0000317183,0.0039763027,0.000064850996,0.000024626284,0.989943,0.0032051231,0.0025897895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048745158,0.000054315926,0.007070006,0.00067099393,0.000020886006,0.00024063421,0.019645693,0.00037524087,0.00042536462,0.5545646,0.41682482,0.0000586459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017370064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0126833515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017370064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014065261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031597624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10205108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154988461","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0003","title":"The Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Status quo; Law and economics; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Law; Legal realism; Legal research; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014877897780977298,"score_gpt":0.2264908908722523,"score_spread":0.21161299309127501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154988461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005827955,0.0100493785,0.12251599,0.03722361,0.0005594735,0.00008846051,0.00018742919,0.00019620018,0.8233515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89474726,0.008375593,0.036488086,0.008314798,0.0015844511,0.00033182153,0.00023752195,0.00023004452,0.04969035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98732555,0.0059706704,0.0004843783,0.0014793732,0.0030803496,0.001659715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943494,0.0031538752,0.00048073247,0.0009265389,0.00083703024,0.00025247296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007941378,0.00082105445,0.0010120638,0.0036135176,0.006778172,0.01563244,0.0032030146,0.0058384663,0.007564852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011238699,0.0006498728,0.0014886927,0.0037045784,0.07458308,0.013989998,0.005310288,0.0074015562,0.0013315261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.92971e-7,8.2416375e-7,0.000015670956,0.000007172627,0.0000014127379,0.000007397743,0.00021635028,0.00010220336,0.0000068919435,0.99856985,0.00042958432,0.0006417049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004940936,0.000002785725,0.00005845198,0.000041240673,0.0000033707436,0.000019145451,0.00020803895,0.00032405433,0.000038761314,0.97236437,0.026929926,0.000004955069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038893808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0219878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038893808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020760337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017641231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1506275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158042753","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2926","title":"The lawyer as fiduciary: Defining private law duties in public law relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Law; Obligation; Discretion; Normative; Political science; Private law; Trust law; Sociology; Law and economics; Public law","score_opus":0.05001110103854751,"score_gpt":0.31067836116635655,"score_spread":0.26066726012780905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158042753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22530976,0.009806322,0.09410954,0.065909974,0.000550244,0.00018067866,0.00005271183,0.00008569939,0.6039951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98793834,0.0008374058,0.0037470895,0.0017278052,0.00023588825,0.00006699939,0.000012925775,0.00003756455,0.005396002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990462,0.0051982254,0.0004046973,0.00063898816,0.001850579,0.0014454795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884694,0.006884976,0.0014163484,0.0013253603,0.00079809595,0.0011058471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069301403,0.00031328382,0.0005788109,0.0029444906,0.010329663,0.02206634,0.001520911,0.009886887,0.0035742312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014055352,0.00062869204,0.00054098887,0.0027557034,0.065846466,0.027147489,0.008735197,0.007900845,0.00064311444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003890355,0.000021896472,0.00040633976,0.00001248485,9.716393e-7,0.00004791829,0.0107637495,0.0000547208,0.000049005255,0.9852461,0.0003616491,0.0030313798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009120732,0.000023925339,0.0017857783,0.00021380011,0.000004847908,0.00023407792,0.015222874,0.0010229594,0.00015710018,0.94841945,0.032886058,0.000020055655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069015105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005951766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02206634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011480167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007864013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08329481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158052902","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2087","title":"Private ownership and the standing to say so","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Institution; Law and economics; Politics; Property (philosophy); Order (exchange); Law; Private law; Sociology; Political science; Business; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029379287020417144,"score_gpt":0.26759781105064157,"score_spread":0.23821852403022442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158052902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1160296,0.0055471747,0.044822503,0.124924384,0.0007321443,0.000046365752,0.00013311472,0.00009469995,0.70767003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840936,0.00045666107,0.0013039414,0.0021090005,0.0001991732,0.000022511615,0.000018434048,0.000026148693,0.011770477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994892,0.0026004242,0.00016550068,0.00072274,0.00080556504,0.00081391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289083,0.0034529713,0.000709659,0.0013004425,0.00083863403,0.0008074619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007384274,0.00027685176,0.00040980004,0.00085583865,0.005738903,0.008858079,0.000959734,0.004165336,0.0062355595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077864025,0.00031940328,0.00048663263,0.00079354533,0.05412618,0.012452732,0.0054238657,0.004514959,0.000698239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002333505,0.000002987959,0.00011158546,0.000004652073,0.0000017033746,0.000013338363,0.0013837414,0.000031937863,0.000024660141,0.99700874,0.0006313062,0.00078313105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010360418,0.0000151931,0.0005069494,0.000056157274,0.000006062215,0.00006931251,0.0027113783,0.00031051008,0.00014583339,0.9502457,0.045910258,0.000012318117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060975966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005662907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008858079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044305795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004079837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039052248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162482819","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0117","title":"THE CONSTITUTION AS FRAMEWORK FOR GOVERNANCE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Corporate governance; Public administration; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.010284514206548316,"score_gpt":0.25738612952854023,"score_spread":0.2471016153219919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162482819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00535981,0.010060393,0.03865544,0.04300572,0.0006041552,0.00014657028,0.0004023027,0.00014386301,0.9016218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82806116,0.009091957,0.030941933,0.01055882,0.0006147084,0.00049751415,0.00051118725,0.00015569292,0.11956713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440336,0.0016517467,0.00015016257,0.0009065791,0.0015329997,0.0013551065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843055,0.00040539447,0.0000862492,0.0003207491,0.0004777735,0.0002792202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005303401,0.0006049489,0.0006493342,0.0018613188,0.0074832826,0.010696068,0.0017870596,0.0037974091,0.00617906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045398925,0.00031769773,0.00044700745,0.0022056082,0.040107198,0.0053952606,0.0032263356,0.005159217,0.0008446951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.175811e-7,4.215588e-7,0.0000116950305,0.0000034317252,3.592833e-7,0.0000052767,0.00017431255,0.000093159804,0.000008117801,0.9983169,0.00084187003,0.000543891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000093571025,0.0000037510758,0.00019074595,0.00008573521,0.000003509469,0.000017142496,0.00038851306,0.0003813022,0.00003859413,0.8287299,0.17014132,0.000010168766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6149951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5082085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6149951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050625484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056276508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7745445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165253292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.0301-2","title":"THE OVER-CRIMINALIZATION OF PERSONS WITH HIV","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Exceptionalism; Harm; Criminology; Sexual assault; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Environmental health; History; Virology; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.008283993410580115,"score_gpt":0.21478927099888664,"score_spread":0.20650527758830653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165253292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70710427,0.0028279931,0.0014329666,0.054871403,0.0004376246,0.000037004495,0.000036021578,0.00002909054,0.23322359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858618,0.0005124399,0.00017899858,0.008720463,0.000083463456,0.000008296986,0.000008030986,0.000005604548,0.004620984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949962,0.0018132568,0.0002802184,0.00041329535,0.0009585369,0.0015386224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617887,0.001096508,0.00080060516,0.00038994607,0.0005517123,0.0009823702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028990307,0.00014592921,0.00030889947,0.0006539137,0.011328602,0.003116131,0.00071306,0.0020327894,0.0013594637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007855399,0.00021350267,0.00024434345,0.00037958173,0.013776104,0.0018896061,0.005575051,0.004973649,0.00013554793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003101708,0.00008158433,0.052137192,0.00007805066,0.000025549356,0.003730502,0.11198395,0.00022706315,0.001183319,0.74702895,0.016494796,0.06699793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037457117,0.00034518735,0.13900338,0.0014219065,0.00009847915,0.019305892,0.14249578,0.0019353479,0.004925665,0.15722512,0.53304064,0.00016515699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061571646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105049916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061571646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002780938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006457971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12242657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W216707762","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2012-02r","title":"Tribal Constitutionalism: States, Tribes and the Governance of Membership; Beyond Blood: Rethinking Indigenous Identity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Identity (music); Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; Democracy; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.010995649330058628,"score_gpt":0.174968539463916,"score_spread":0.16397289013385738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W216707762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37343106,0.0031284788,0.012531894,0.065202765,0.0004128623,0.00005213099,0.00008136276,0.000045919962,0.5451135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932029,0.0002114555,0.00039852783,0.0008407077,0.000044888264,0.000015765605,0.0000069814423,0.000021624624,0.0052572098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952146,0.002684126,0.000097298944,0.00057615625,0.00043950175,0.0009883405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949196,0.0027474326,0.00037490687,0.0007510454,0.0004925957,0.0007144664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071775583,0.0002144295,0.00046528425,0.0012931064,0.013972269,0.015393002,0.002578421,0.0036778522,0.007140084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013297679,0.00034266026,0.00024048737,0.0020110789,0.0862326,0.010522213,0.0083515635,0.0059129186,0.0002808304],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008300498,0.000008641793,0.0008185484,0.00001737704,0.000002697356,0.000042582753,0.09950734,0.000059107213,0.000062997184,0.89415807,0.0010908704,0.004223489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021317537,0.000026471773,0.0070979423,0.00029158787,0.000033411572,0.00006606728,0.26770243,0.00053919794,0.00036051442,0.6096036,0.11421828,0.000039244078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09509825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17028287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99005187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009948134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015185618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18908942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171032244","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.123","title":"WHY DOES ONTARIO REQUIRE EQUAL TREATMENT IN SALES OF CORPORATE CONTROL?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Control (management); Business; Law and economics; Event study; Value (mathematics); Empirical evidence; Tender offer; Empirical research; Microeconomics; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Corporate governance; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.025174482933552827,"score_gpt":0.18008237044853323,"score_spread":0.1549078875149804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171032244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34377,0.0014268918,0.00697128,0.066080876,0.0004446972,0.00016616978,0.0004965031,0.00007655266,0.58056706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958884,0.00039237746,0.0009605529,0.0057763965,0.00012935275,0.00002468119,0.0000968062,0.000019801295,0.033716034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934848,0.00035833096,0.00018049039,0.00090868806,0.003316465,0.001751198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947982,0.0011470531,0.0006978745,0.0007766833,0.0019193136,0.000660764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026304903,0.00014395975,0.00036427163,0.00051452214,0.0067985617,0.00333892,0.0011765256,0.0035036183,0.006373377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010391531,0.000348984,0.0005390237,0.0009858669,0.008322045,0.002694109,0.0013733557,0.0027782524,0.00047460973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024061001,0.00009295648,0.04127967,0.00014042007,0.00005749297,0.0008672363,0.0076859626,0.0007443937,0.0019481635,0.86989,0.028471095,0.048582062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027766745,0.00023883619,0.32325235,0.00032859182,0.00013812869,0.00079495413,0.009924961,0.0027586694,0.004605597,0.18654077,0.47093153,0.00020801686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82418716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9102646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17581284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02715677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025289468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35369647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172136248","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.941","title":"IS SYSTEMIC RISK RELEVANT TO SECURITIES REGULATION?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Systemic risk; Broker-dealer; Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Realm; Business; Financial regulation; Hybrid security; Financial institution; Financial market; Financial system; Economics; Investment banking; Financial crisis; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.009638277215983728,"score_gpt":0.1877742171988643,"score_spread":0.17813593998288058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172136248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11814331,0.02653433,0.095778264,0.45040467,0.002190755,0.000089491085,0.00018084868,0.00017830094,0.3065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676967,0.0068997345,0.0025744208,0.014510868,0.0021868274,0.000045661778,0.000026011043,0.000032164655,0.006027645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442106,0.0019445192,0.0003102731,0.0009979669,0.0016863972,0.000639765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836928,0.009454551,0.0032276562,0.0014374844,0.0017123091,0.0004752014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008224293,0.00029331353,0.00085171126,0.0008466157,0.0013869156,0.00514125,0.0008995086,0.0061028614,0.0028425772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018092386,0.00030191918,0.0009203789,0.0008295268,0.017169772,0.0057468372,0.0022088313,0.0065834005,0.0004191168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009321529,0.000010801434,0.0006772127,0.000036847185,0.000009459413,0.00008938633,0.0003047094,0.00076548033,0.00014713946,0.9906063,0.0023100532,0.0050333403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011155543,0.000013661241,0.0009664308,0.00009236128,0.000015795036,0.00009173057,0.00017407852,0.0013887404,0.00019655132,0.9837625,0.01327234,0.000014769197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027941056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001477644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008224293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035707396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036414012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04349476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246285831","doi":"10.2307/825992","title":"Taking Law Seriously","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; sort; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.014648262376545214,"score_gpt":0.2551295873113233,"score_spread":0.24048132493477808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246285831","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004758609,0.1482135,0.015533143,0.5535968,0.012256467,0.000053519267,0.00011852227,0.00014695968,0.26532245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42808944,0.14090547,0.016538218,0.27468976,0.031629257,0.0001814175,0.0002111564,0.000234133,0.10752109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943916,0.0023420842,0.00021988148,0.00057616393,0.0020239719,0.0004463337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940129,0.0031782647,0.00031796697,0.00052909227,0.0014025146,0.00055928365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069143637,0.00058484694,0.0010367375,0.001667495,0.006397046,0.012133234,0.0013964536,0.008200206,0.004063276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011228541,0.00036096582,0.00054989284,0.0015452852,0.022494076,0.013264859,0.0030625532,0.008614078,0.0015899622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005363539,0.000010427152,0.00022628046,0.0001876525,0.000012785414,0.00008963194,0.0028225698,0.0002073763,0.00011857893,0.9131406,0.060723104,0.022455707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004413162,0.00001668467,0.0003080624,0.0004628595,0.000012394442,0.00009659409,0.002447742,0.0001718329,0.00010008883,0.43150494,0.56486386,0.000010510111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019653851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026404826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019653851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007966131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00962463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057798624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255984055","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3437","title":"The lure and the limits of dialogue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028836825296061897,"score_gpt":0.24361622916133863,"score_spread":0.21477940386527672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255984055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07590609,0.03466207,0.024886739,0.2593297,0.001162871,0.000068819216,0.000111049994,0.00018484844,0.6036879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824671,0.0027445327,0.0019443785,0.005297399,0.0005153611,0.000091593975,0.000019829491,0.0001011673,0.0068186806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93231505,0.055167813,0.0010954795,0.0033852134,0.0054221037,0.0026143715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95655113,0.033844925,0.0019062797,0.003765779,0.0022321262,0.0016997689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029197507,0.000568854,0.0011462021,0.00317015,0.021910304,0.024377985,0.002221791,0.007965118,0.004982402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046691753,0.0008354329,0.00051547715,0.0024914106,0.17205717,0.032418124,0.018434439,0.012419024,0.00083633536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009147229,0.000002923711,0.00008160032,0.000029086224,0.000002100154,0.000039532788,0.041368987,0.00005074934,0.00004247061,0.95532656,0.00095793104,0.0020888615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026873118,0.000016420881,0.00022900518,0.00028557537,0.0000071912386,0.00016952973,0.036795888,0.0002779602,0.00013018936,0.8415221,0.12051473,0.0000245617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014032533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007889293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029197507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019001551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009321344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15441298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258436064","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3244","title":"Polycentricity and queue jumping in public law remedies: A two-track response","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polycentricity; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Sociology; Negotiation; Legislature; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05971884230427966,"score_gpt":0.30081584581321086,"score_spread":0.2410970035089312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258436064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051435903,0.0036966368,0.010651122,0.83322245,0.002496939,0.00007876852,0.00008552362,0.0001305269,0.09820203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62973154,0.0025574733,0.0027414158,0.32795057,0.003440157,0.00013236185,0.000048601163,0.000119471595,0.033278365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836377,0.0046018003,0.0007613894,0.002840784,0.0050997455,0.0030586529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97216,0.019289216,0.0025881266,0.001645038,0.0031212633,0.0011963227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017187605,0.0005781672,0.0007055797,0.0016147699,0.013964065,0.013220912,0.003298918,0.027145484,0.008736799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0374985,0.000709714,0.0013520934,0.001792592,0.036411297,0.020635348,0.01575597,0.032138523,0.0006493893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029178367,0.000033065568,0.0009878952,0.000061991435,0.000011818529,0.00045444243,0.012188302,0.00029418617,0.00023689709,0.9281397,0.048819717,0.00874289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013535007,0.00012210682,0.00401112,0.00055199733,0.000048898684,0.0005997769,0.027642542,0.0017345259,0.0011638117,0.26417628,0.6996056,0.00020810409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034045946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039150186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034045946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014948854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01264973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108462036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259722634","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3398","title":"The inhospitable court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Jury; Allegation; Plaintiff; Sexual violence; Law; Criminology; Meaning (existential); Political science; Criminal justice; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.007220496383931603,"score_gpt":0.21774061532967542,"score_spread":0.21052011894574382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259722634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13138224,0.001684722,0.012703269,0.032546047,0.0006156165,0.00016579875,0.00013831934,0.00008117676,0.8206828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541795,0.00030116283,0.0010804038,0.0028361366,0.00017915825,0.00006243378,0.00003529895,0.000041234973,0.041284617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893478,0.0044960356,0.00031905874,0.0014381291,0.002951888,0.0014470654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940211,0.0018795693,0.0006509412,0.0011626121,0.0008335648,0.0014521728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040245494,0.0002981099,0.00031894413,0.0008009437,0.011329232,0.009784638,0.0011847527,0.0022261166,0.014255006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01825858,0.00030897133,0.00016377939,0.0005365456,0.027923383,0.0037405167,0.00987261,0.0048893876,0.0011081806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027392107,0.00002196306,0.0023667095,0.00004869573,0.000010650087,0.00083249644,0.046003703,0.00012845323,0.0011501792,0.9087191,0.016701298,0.023989243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003268902,0.000079437916,0.008518475,0.0003776357,0.000016819804,0.0012392439,0.07590725,0.0006057053,0.0012131165,0.33120912,0.5807448,0.00005563124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010923022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020278895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014255006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004805094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007186691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04768777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261443190","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2964","title":"Public law and ordinary legal method: Revisiting Dicey’s approach to <i>droit administratif</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Public law; Principle of legality; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Municipal law; Political science; Legal history; Common law; Positive law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.0647117251803447,"score_gpt":0.2874538842758036,"score_spread":0.2227421590954589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261443190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042323273,0.021276157,0.06184808,0.089592606,0.0011782831,0.00009178714,0.000100728,0.00014869467,0.7834405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423159,0.004513917,0.011252865,0.01017883,0.0008261952,0.00010602998,0.000036320114,0.000091589325,0.030678336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226576,0.003787902,0.0002911065,0.0011386654,0.0014333348,0.0010832067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548006,0.0027952732,0.0003278328,0.0003247178,0.00077464676,0.0002973595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067964634,0.0005222363,0.0007667223,0.0044360724,0.009069824,0.016322426,0.0019716674,0.006118755,0.002956154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064017554,0.00041819885,0.000647282,0.0023639605,0.040311996,0.011042778,0.005574311,0.0069595203,0.00040765508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019615527,0.0000019955385,0.000032075997,0.00000857111,8.283967e-7,0.00002377184,0.0023186114,0.000036911537,0.000009980709,0.9960521,0.0006753512,0.0008379247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016856176,0.00002632761,0.0006081341,0.00018754735,0.000013205467,0.00016311111,0.0042218245,0.00094871724,0.00024222172,0.68755084,0.30599105,0.000030149595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048227552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037962396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048227552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024888663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008715672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18058074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272064723","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3239","title":"Adjudicating constitutional rights in administrative law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Formalism (music); Human rights; Common law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.053723045879230845,"score_gpt":0.2983441586715995,"score_spread":0.24462111279236867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272064723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08310308,0.007267596,0.30420652,0.04300314,0.0010845776,0.0005285963,0.0001348993,0.00023994643,0.56043166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94611174,0.0018349495,0.031400062,0.0030398152,0.0005932091,0.00034465647,0.000054471937,0.00008658657,0.01653441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9121914,0.048481215,0.005864893,0.005773014,0.017048396,0.010641067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9332989,0.047748998,0.0033661327,0.008801808,0.005533558,0.0012506229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05620176,0.00061900774,0.0012993575,0.0039676256,0.011763011,0.021469055,0.0038109408,0.012001361,0.0041218973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079958215,0.0012484596,0.0015732447,0.003910856,0.080327906,0.020657094,0.011716386,0.009792704,0.0008012265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027709282,0.000004218726,0.000097233016,0.000011265031,0.000002614276,0.000037727394,0.001357248,0.00022948941,0.000049230628,0.9962851,0.00027278494,0.0016502591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022906452,0.000021592996,0.00036970444,0.00014811006,0.000014986529,0.000065175474,0.0014157185,0.0011437504,0.00043493832,0.960682,0.03565008,0.00003100644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03451233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027030634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05620176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017346965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027876388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29722685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291541762","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3155","title":"An economic analysis of waiver of tort in negligence actions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Plaintiff; Tort; Doctrine; Damages; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Liability; Deterrence theory; Contributory negligence; Strict liability; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.0226978752234672,"score_gpt":0.21142859090212532,"score_spread":0.18873071567865812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291541762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22380683,0.01067287,0.15814865,0.03021337,0.00046263012,0.00047025757,0.0005979723,0.000120985394,0.5755064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708943,0.002810368,0.0034973975,0.0005559126,0.00024441563,0.000111491085,0.00007539269,0.000018410132,0.021792386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973611,0.0009188728,0.000107367756,0.00018764472,0.00081171835,0.0006132892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453247,0.0036680847,0.00081496703,0.00020266934,0.0004886754,0.00029313198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030706017,0.00047747415,0.00082431996,0.0022037737,0.0020916834,0.0053857733,0.0012112049,0.0029263922,0.0051654154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011279849,0.000595369,0.0010491402,0.0014662357,0.004825106,0.0044661174,0.0016573912,0.0032617068,0.00031498433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014920439,0.000025781119,0.0007184194,0.000031010244,0.000017533941,0.00013681747,0.000083164545,0.016313115,0.0001038049,0.9773179,0.00140575,0.0038317835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000337803,0.000099697994,0.0054458543,0.00018069094,0.00010552625,0.00026226547,0.00046025487,0.099734165,0.00034268523,0.8702618,0.023014897,0.00005840354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024721608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021530597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024721608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013351197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059209545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096870124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312964853","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3622","title":"Between universalism and relativism: Reflections on the evolution of law and development studies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Political science; Bureaucracy; Washington Consensus; Universal suffrage; Law and development; Context (archaeology); Relativism; Politics; Blueprint; Political economy; Developing country; Development economics; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Epistemology; Development studies; History","score_opus":0.0705247228216803,"score_gpt":0.3010891666861169,"score_spread":0.23056444386443659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312964853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030904457,0.10307676,0.033835948,0.66345876,0.004222633,0.00005610348,0.00006257977,0.00010940711,0.1642734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90305483,0.031721417,0.010965049,0.040643994,0.006378952,0.00016621918,0.00004795209,0.00024999093,0.0067717154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95817,0.031248268,0.001035384,0.0030137834,0.0043407273,0.002191839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90627605,0.08281748,0.0023370732,0.004408424,0.0026469268,0.0015141021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053828917,0.0008163985,0.0015653431,0.008621231,0.013113643,0.020752769,0.0036779847,0.010601688,0.0034055924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04255828,0.0009647623,0.001163496,0.0067490158,0.1936422,0.04731211,0.01787154,0.02414182,0.00031202802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003989201,0.000006911178,0.00009476865,0.000028849325,0.0000027537185,0.000023420316,0.007233731,0.00007014644,0.000013189542,0.98964524,0.00083697995,0.0020398586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010828358,0.000014505748,0.00020227616,0.00023733113,0.0000037409172,0.00005864394,0.008144441,0.00019125934,0.00005104095,0.92475706,0.06631215,0.00001668667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009876087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068293316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053828917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023994252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010288014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28467786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314134142","doi":"10.2307/825999","title":"The Legitimate Extent of Freedom of Expression","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.014263215657445864,"score_gpt":0.22510592371711377,"score_spread":0.2108427080596679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314134142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03727716,0.0025734003,0.01376033,0.018117558,0.00019883049,0.000030137468,0.00015331451,0.00003492825,0.92785436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98557633,0.0004424029,0.00088104827,0.000566982,0.00015834824,0.000047707184,0.000033876273,0.00002693927,0.012266285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861057,0.0067839804,0.00065507396,0.001688151,0.0030272063,0.0017397731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783039,0.012628489,0.0010604839,0.00441913,0.0023336606,0.0012543376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009815743,0.00036536893,0.0008502946,0.0024135744,0.008127899,0.015311264,0.0014013841,0.0063639083,0.008359228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022732403,0.00070564996,0.0006040101,0.0019759086,0.06633573,0.012119987,0.0063766027,0.006306569,0.00093286217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003157103,0.000001733264,0.00005169606,0.0000033962824,0.0000010354639,0.0000062001286,0.0009755736,0.00002428889,0.00001960401,0.9982141,0.00022637047,0.00047278457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000773249,0.0000046693917,0.0005160786,0.00003723728,0.000006389805,0.000023605997,0.001092503,0.00012908137,0.0000949441,0.98545,0.012630568,0.000007089306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01766498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02212695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01766498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009962943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069938735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072286546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320189691","doi":"10.2307/825913","title":"The Charter and Poverty: Beyond Injusticiability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.010514691940649535,"score_gpt":0.23122063798725465,"score_spread":0.22070594604660512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320189691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12350154,0.011708435,0.0103430925,0.27663538,0.00068065623,0.000052713858,0.00019642178,0.00005766633,0.57682407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98243034,0.0015251326,0.000476305,0.0024375245,0.00019557324,0.000022786604,0.000013852074,0.000023485905,0.012874998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960498,0.001958076,0.00010091728,0.00028924746,0.00066111033,0.00094084494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914675,0.0043497086,0.0010665937,0.0008268482,0.001067412,0.0012219815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043944763,0.00036707302,0.0006544162,0.0019687365,0.010880213,0.012940302,0.000989296,0.0049907225,0.009539069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01195712,0.0003824337,0.00022765031,0.002380737,0.076065965,0.010444745,0.0062998347,0.0053853365,0.00028322238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044143585,0.0000045180677,0.00036069652,0.0000105795625,0.0000013630164,0.000026299616,0.0046594786,0.00006421852,0.000012340213,0.9894818,0.0030915008,0.002282806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014302605,0.0000130966255,0.002515808,0.00015999297,0.000010023983,0.00004967651,0.017874219,0.00033684995,0.000101519996,0.896759,0.082143,0.000022506392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22482918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2865662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7751708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017962238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019083926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4470411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326814643","doi":"10.2307/3650877","title":"Atoms of the Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Atomic and Molecular Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.00392297835788481,"score_gpt":0.17396237466412345,"score_spread":0.17003939630623865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326814643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005594332,0.011897124,0.002197978,0.09422518,0.0018535389,0.000048363334,0.00039976157,0.00009420262,0.88368946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30926403,0.005976481,0.0011119153,0.026199387,0.0018726976,0.00006891787,0.00019603873,0.00016035487,0.6551502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984333,0.00035368002,0.00004507889,0.00030547476,0.000527403,0.0003350396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840194,0.00044196198,0.000097496224,0.00030235847,0.00038343653,0.00037283095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001612236,0.0005222549,0.0005172781,0.0008184255,0.011913029,0.009419488,0.00079334836,0.0051777004,0.036005486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068685613,0.00048247984,0.00031460798,0.0008531148,0.015424017,0.0043994426,0.0025295252,0.0074196127,0.0035177108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009099061,0.0000057255097,0.00017271357,0.000013106321,0.0000027589126,0.000023292618,0.00086667744,0.000058468075,0.000040657735,0.9020065,0.09414395,0.002657077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012004189,0.000009144636,0.00083999266,0.00006985849,0.00000767838,0.00003271546,0.0010030927,0.00019532842,0.000116849915,0.19251539,0.8051838,0.000014170867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3730204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46611312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3730204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01986128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018229188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7416984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331989244","doi":"10.2307/825927","title":"Identifying the Maori Treaty Partner","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0442503408053541,"score_gpt":0.2614163553888796,"score_spread":0.21716601458352547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331989244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6623391,0.0087034805,0.0023446118,0.052091755,0.00057338923,0.00022459535,0.0003504879,0.000033617536,0.27333897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9378664,0.0039897766,0.0010247228,0.003141689,0.00016315593,0.00015841435,0.00015571878,0.000021399137,0.053478796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843484,0.0004810913,0.000045783305,0.00008977162,0.00040212594,0.0005462486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985921,0.00024264684,0.00036538433,0.00010316159,0.0003610137,0.00033575567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029164974,0.00022087219,0.00030979957,0.0017150423,0.006332155,0.0028164966,0.0005133029,0.0012601208,0.0077888602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008327615,0.00017385784,0.00015891493,0.0016414117,0.0017976074,0.0031829267,0.0044833953,0.0018244877,0.0009855701],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096938515,0.000081339385,0.20027773,0.0001773346,0.00003626171,0.0019173804,0.31726062,0.00009236547,0.001659598,0.18229571,0.14184311,0.15426163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016726352,0.00011411521,0.15827903,0.0009149721,0.00006103681,0.0017214268,0.40519345,0.00044750833,0.0013612466,0.013041058,0.4187852,0.000064212276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046133343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09932537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046133343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020472996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035180065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09172964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361095287","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3873","title":"Acquisitive prescription and fundamental rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Doctrine; Nothing; Medical prescription; Law; Virtue; Political science; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.01045418138607904,"score_gpt":0.23882048966831887,"score_spread":0.22836630828223983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361095287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048012562,0.005880164,0.030750075,0.02002219,0.00030513163,0.000071787494,0.000076067365,0.00009498107,0.8947871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94446266,0.0018761083,0.004142283,0.002724377,0.00034995488,0.00010125435,0.000032439497,0.00005149145,0.046259474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994333,0.0026575187,0.0002488473,0.000777454,0.0012648049,0.0007184709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744725,0.0012776951,0.0002690386,0.00045359737,0.00038918343,0.00016322716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006232245,0.00036454125,0.00043408357,0.0011068844,0.0071720863,0.0057880837,0.0011116337,0.0044829696,0.0042486764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006936789,0.00043692,0.00038134228,0.0011915057,0.06224214,0.006199426,0.00516226,0.005503634,0.0006285734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001106788,0.0000013986189,0.000016366326,0.0000039038346,3.3238462e-7,0.000008082641,0.0008071892,0.000025466958,0.000024130468,0.9983059,0.000212606,0.0005933752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134976835,0.000018502005,0.00031295067,0.00009807696,0.000004135105,0.000095455165,0.0008893723,0.0003512713,0.0003636537,0.90636164,0.09147289,0.000018592107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016193585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013427806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016193585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007791336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00649835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056530416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399871532","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3671","title":"Law and development: Forty years after ‘Scholars in Self-Estrangement’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Embeddedness; Field (mathematics); Political science; Relation (database); Law; Milestone; Sociology; Social science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.009156073736940879,"score_gpt":0.22802735484153128,"score_spread":0.2188712811045904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399871532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009535057,0.10707784,0.0023189927,0.82266974,0.0068265963,0.000015945136,0.000025772444,0.00003429917,0.051495776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66820866,0.08965254,0.004440684,0.15592287,0.014225238,0.00012148869,0.00007354845,0.00019815213,0.067156754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97695255,0.015384341,0.00052346004,0.0016345682,0.0031965731,0.002308511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707083,0.019822767,0.0011263886,0.002399185,0.00337481,0.0025685662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023554517,0.0004883491,0.0007339036,0.0021676847,0.010236121,0.021554107,0.0016839235,0.009017539,0.0032141504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02482997,0.00037474436,0.0005357601,0.003027819,0.0743422,0.023809193,0.008458834,0.015578828,0.0005982153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012363272,0.000014482414,0.00025017752,0.00006390246,0.0000033525596,0.00009849901,0.031313077,0.000057245703,0.0000571048,0.92467946,0.02762912,0.015821202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008383166,0.00002411244,0.0006149083,0.0006843387,0.0000040429964,0.00008025455,0.022169193,0.00009387433,0.00014517,0.24235958,0.733794,0.00002213007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01623549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01736379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023554517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0230616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021259185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16732442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416877329","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3808","title":"Enhancing moral relationships through strict liability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Liability; Strict liability; Doctrine; Moral responsibility; Law and economics; Default rule; Blame; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04650170053143371,"score_gpt":0.22399929395256063,"score_spread":0.17749759342112692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416877329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094920725,0.0013623403,0.42476076,0.024722984,0.0005602525,0.00024978264,0.000049398634,0.0006396009,0.4527341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9201746,0.0006694638,0.046220977,0.0031020117,0.000279872,0.00020331028,0.000038839615,0.00012684209,0.029184144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98797846,0.005306826,0.00061054144,0.0012106076,0.003966577,0.0009269101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789467,0.008459788,0.00432734,0.0039434596,0.002142725,0.0021799859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012070843,0.00056029327,0.00043127453,0.001165016,0.0038506456,0.0061871232,0.0019352278,0.0029246036,0.01057855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034361325,0.00048586456,0.000668972,0.0005630932,0.010749468,0.008938445,0.013021127,0.004919559,0.0019249665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016798593,0.00010524685,0.0009686936,0.000056836067,0.000009849256,0.00021508332,0.0039108596,0.0018001107,0.0011189332,0.9580781,0.0021546877,0.031564686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030930998,0.00013913355,0.0013567627,0.00015061784,0.000022392553,0.0004384799,0.0015148807,0.005479831,0.0011505865,0.9305059,0.059166957,0.000043574255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012680074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013571861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012070843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025173237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06383753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461480614","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3761","title":"The past and future of law and development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Ethnocentrism; Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.00945480414423544,"score_gpt":0.2261087200482236,"score_spread":0.21665391590398816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461480614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048773047,0.28792152,0.0041685645,0.49974003,0.0035656253,0.000016275228,0.00006488849,0.000070202215,0.19957565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6390201,0.23101474,0.007279577,0.07077161,0.006833647,0.00014450392,0.000099524594,0.00011471444,0.044721656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911004,0.0051914463,0.00029321533,0.0008658836,0.0013194438,0.0012296134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914909,0.004827313,0.0005221957,0.00085363584,0.0009372928,0.0013686449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008219721,0.00051170547,0.0006141075,0.0034094772,0.0089098215,0.020248743,0.0014226434,0.0059782555,0.0067068865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077230935,0.00030233458,0.0003927778,0.0039861077,0.050886296,0.023365313,0.008047046,0.008074402,0.0009001581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060561865,0.000007777588,0.00022534782,0.000078882294,0.0000025288061,0.000040132938,0.0038764658,0.000043947253,0.00002721509,0.96954286,0.011482277,0.014666643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003411753,0.000014719044,0.00048172887,0.0006544806,0.0000025012532,0.00009329384,0.00829107,0.000121953446,0.00004307362,0.383206,0.6070742,0.000013547384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010880409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013624764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020248743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01502715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016440101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10903013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465874630","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3851","title":"Taking on responsibility and trusting others: A response to Shiffrin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06740742379365061,"score_gpt":0.2692754594714817,"score_spread":0.20186803567783107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465874630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032899315,0.00360637,0.0006671139,0.98827237,0.0009892052,0.0000029800742,0.000007728545,0.000008769473,0.0031555432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27657476,0.007854988,0.0017365114,0.6961166,0.007909262,0.000057033172,0.000013300574,0.000059263446,0.009678299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947872,0.0026553953,0.00015660888,0.0009253738,0.0011845597,0.00029073862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662132,0.02784737,0.00104621,0.0012946973,0.0023315933,0.0012668627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013552572,0.00051183207,0.0011686906,0.0007945937,0.006527114,0.0056504295,0.0026769943,0.032049693,0.0025427626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026492111,0.00044943154,0.00059108465,0.0010663896,0.037139915,0.023272103,0.0041339663,0.030669846,0.000610448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007985686,0.00007446779,0.0008497395,0.00011192487,0.000016620066,0.00070988195,0.034061376,0.0003342183,0.00027276878,0.6388123,0.3098982,0.014778639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067755565,0.00008287995,0.002164475,0.000513913,0.00001735988,0.001345005,0.028385345,0.001292856,0.00038624613,0.50367427,0.46186477,0.00020521469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016527975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015614517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032049693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009337025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044923704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07167375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W249145109","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2015.1","title":"Middle Income Access to Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Demographic economics; Criminology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07346225000072863,"score_gpt":0.30139953577419404,"score_spread":0.2279372857734654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W249145109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5021365,0.00085572543,0.00019107568,0.018990051,0.0001104431,0.000035817822,0.000989518,0.000022128934,0.47666878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94109464,0.0004423427,0.00005613661,0.0012706872,0.00004002643,0.000017717752,0.00015082007,0.000005941612,0.056921616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988882,0.000085355045,0.00001572991,0.00004891553,0.0001710754,0.000790767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878126,0.00012318102,0.000095407755,0.000055963847,0.00020650057,0.00073774735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000491889,0.0001343594,0.00024789022,0.0010318776,0.007230901,0.0038873043,0.00036325783,0.0006595584,0.046412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021628456,0.00013327226,0.00013035323,0.0010192945,0.0014290056,0.0014806646,0.0026570535,0.001250998,0.0022251932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021223842,0.0002817805,0.12614429,0.0000719292,0.00002888433,0.0013521498,0.040274575,0.0001633222,0.0007952029,0.5857879,0.16485806,0.08002969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003523369,0.000100766876,0.4325477,0.0003321173,0.000034124725,0.00042073862,0.07003291,0.00045949628,0.0005957281,0.04135889,0.4540374,0.000044850673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25280997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57209533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25280997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052024485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006427603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5026769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507249553","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4008","title":"The path of the law: Towards legal singularity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Witness; Singularity; Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Tax law; Sociology; Mathematics; Tax reform","score_opus":0.02024037742337321,"score_gpt":0.2663106734233213,"score_spread":0.24607029599994812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507249553","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028354393,0.22090684,0.0108870845,0.6328674,0.0035562818,0.000019562638,0.00010322731,0.000067319044,0.12875688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44869947,0.1862802,0.0065911342,0.29732788,0.0176157,0.00018969155,0.0001986531,0.00020304057,0.04289421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868989,0.0055407747,0.000509559,0.0013311105,0.004481123,0.0012386154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828499,0.012135828,0.0008680077,0.0007325771,0.0026299073,0.0007839029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01158998,0.00039884166,0.0007917518,0.0031955119,0.006223014,0.009410745,0.00190787,0.011270685,0.0065146587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030436143,0.0004577307,0.00060961425,0.0031128887,0.03533547,0.023873758,0.005027593,0.016448176,0.0011373177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020015905,0.0000042686142,0.00004765706,0.00002514833,0.0000012764252,0.0000254916,0.00043761177,0.000052217198,0.000006259306,0.971058,0.024670832,0.003669226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066725797,0.0000073707374,0.00016625958,0.00031424913,0.0000022038232,0.00005755067,0.0006629518,0.00021424658,0.00002040873,0.73984545,0.2586915,0.000011099452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01831513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0122366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01831513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013334166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01562889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09674662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513622979","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1045","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.006228755026898652,"score_gpt":0.21161473306984047,"score_spread":0.2053859780429418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513622979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003747689,0.037682787,0.00036213093,0.03571842,0.02290113,0.000114498136,0.0009130834,0.00029426132,0.9016389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010686739,0.0055262535,0.00006125186,0.003515888,0.001968705,0.000022376289,0.00018461427,0.000048415226,0.9876039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999006,0.00007248886,0.000024000616,0.00008531123,0.000690227,0.00012197216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975211,0.0003839186,0.000094489056,0.00021124326,0.0013300811,0.00045912617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071400526,0.00062242005,0.00073027855,0.003209229,0.0033391376,0.0051267464,0.0012193542,0.0034810351,0.374592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045388667,0.000476991,0.0004823858,0.0037621472,0.0012003931,0.0019845078,0.0015313828,0.0027679065,0.2461015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020359953,0.0000033505362,0.000018957458,0.00002687136,6.0618635e-7,0.000010418119,0.000009615027,0.000013686525,0.000012194904,0.0015170352,0.98679745,0.011587849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015896026,0.0000017952567,0.00010917232,0.000052701587,0.000001239295,0.000011582568,0.000021619573,0.0000102096365,0.0000108340555,0.00040171927,0.999376,0.0000016650758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05958526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19985195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.374592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060376814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008046414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8920686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513997421","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3609","title":"Quantifying <i>Dunsmuir</i>: An empirical analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s jurisprudence on standard of review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Deference; Standard of review; Law; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Voting; Political science; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Medicine","score_opus":0.04199834323995864,"score_gpt":0.3078332140184926,"score_spread":0.26583487077853396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513997421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.932419,0.0016689312,0.001575387,0.007874277,0.00005751723,0.00019411012,0.00046077085,0.000033941124,0.055716153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966427,0.00022679378,0.00046691496,0.00065822457,0.000017848275,0.00002415885,0.000112668786,0.000013497045,0.0018372794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92889535,0.0117104305,0.0034037023,0.0045432104,0.044866867,0.0065803956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64077944,0.17922673,0.060038403,0.011611017,0.0950461,0.013298369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054283123,0.00020434064,0.0006349721,0.009180824,0.011164599,0.010297205,0.0028928625,0.0020063473,0.0020204056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23571451,0.0005712261,0.0005641795,0.012400469,0.011548811,0.0040713325,0.0038150465,0.0043725152,0.00020040423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021314352,0.00023274736,0.7382184,0.00031070015,0.00021992432,0.0006704905,0.09624401,0.0018754315,0.001411191,0.09227366,0.011989548,0.056340653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000187016,0.00009613478,0.9441215,0.00025916766,0.00005375241,0.000111732275,0.023880644,0.0015150738,0.0007386085,0.0024540345,0.026603868,0.00014682378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9509236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9640987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88391685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116083145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10719101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8422461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514792834","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.521","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013165894464398087,"score_gpt":0.20910273735557172,"score_spread":0.19593684289117363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514792834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037298506,0.035928562,0.00036846072,0.035696473,0.021818502,0.000121745856,0.0009371895,0.00031009282,0.90444607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001026015,0.0052046017,0.00006245706,0.0034521373,0.0018185943,0.000023148466,0.00018998065,0.000048553877,0.98817444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989792,0.0000737896,0.00002432251,0.00008683137,0.0007104643,0.00012546817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974492,0.00038791157,0.000096361815,0.00021813442,0.0013780828,0.00047029],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073386583,0.0006280231,0.00075740553,0.0033300126,0.0034469555,0.0051653855,0.0012543495,0.003539808,0.38428128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045950827,0.0004928389,0.0004981879,0.003794782,0.0012086873,0.0019707915,0.0015617032,0.0027637004,0.25434923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019917518,0.0000033668512,0.000018865128,0.000026730899,5.9911355e-7,0.0000101263595,0.0000095242995,0.000013258424,0.000011826895,0.0014488087,0.9869947,0.011460238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016378971,0.0000018258232,0.00011327879,0.000055097007,0.0000012767031,0.000011331125,0.00002208329,0.000010234348,0.000010640272,0.00039399738,0.99937695,0.0000017047912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06143538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.204401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38428128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061498173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008416503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87824804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516572032","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3406","title":"Rethinking original ownership","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Accession; Scholarship; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Dominance (genetics); Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics; Linguistics; Epistemology; International trade; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018252520956592685,"score_gpt":0.18495122941874237,"score_spread":0.16669870846214968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516572032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14586642,0.0020820173,0.055963114,0.027854517,0.00055066147,0.00009166189,0.00009915315,0.0001341015,0.7673583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96397555,0.00036874306,0.0022730692,0.0016271903,0.00016450025,0.00004951956,0.000023919298,0.00006562278,0.031451795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921306,0.002981431,0.00029143348,0.001365354,0.0019298836,0.0013014291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910892,0.0038667612,0.00055547757,0.0027816517,0.0012600836,0.0004467932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010851811,0.00027181127,0.0004354039,0.0011078877,0.005517939,0.008858915,0.0018449666,0.0030070506,0.006990917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018298808,0.00030626496,0.00039734508,0.0011281843,0.03909081,0.011644638,0.008788762,0.0050603584,0.000802862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038810417,0.0000029368678,0.00016019042,0.0000068638547,0.0000012194213,0.00002477641,0.002456677,0.00008364096,0.000075680655,0.9934156,0.00074755587,0.0030210325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003117022,0.000042584816,0.0012617958,0.00019937825,0.000016120992,0.00013993097,0.005036288,0.001419567,0.0008199886,0.7942444,0.19676097,0.000027746326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012325357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0153062185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98767465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009428413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065852534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06840825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525314292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3959","title":"The Moral Unity of Public Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy of law; Adjudication; Dignity; Jurisprudence; Public law; Political science; Analogy; Sociology; Political philosophy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Morality; Politics; Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036241777053454584,"score_gpt":0.24241479684511122,"score_spread":0.20617301979165664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525314292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032380175,0.0042935316,0.053142365,0.15770058,0.0010516153,0.00008588189,0.00012365516,0.00021418845,0.75100803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95824116,0.00084059726,0.0055833766,0.005405093,0.0009585851,0.00009400206,0.00006877469,0.00010085584,0.02870748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880156,0.005157944,0.00033072554,0.0016889544,0.0029516488,0.0018550296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99171466,0.0026217266,0.00071283424,0.0022020694,0.0014482652,0.001300465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011277446,0.0004295615,0.0006221235,0.0018626784,0.012588185,0.019628339,0.0015200807,0.0064741634,0.0052791853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014665011,0.00050818414,0.0007018158,0.001259522,0.07011282,0.0126162255,0.0076587936,0.009365083,0.0009315667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019389033,0.0000051350376,0.00005190499,0.000006089128,0.0000013834231,0.0000088262495,0.0012966834,0.00007744604,0.000022646263,0.9955705,0.001601146,0.0013563684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001096518,0.000008243991,0.00023541691,0.00004683157,0.000005108311,0.000025049449,0.0013241697,0.00032996744,0.00008415257,0.92895234,0.0689699,0.000007873023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014190145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009816679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019628339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015540191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01984495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1127525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553297566","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3855","title":"The Puzzle of Intra-Familial Commodification","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Normative; Context (archaeology); Resentment; Criticism; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Positive economics; Political science; History; Market economy","score_opus":0.015735448531999218,"score_gpt":0.24023396855608983,"score_spread":0.22449852002409063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553297566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17285538,0.00782008,0.021162791,0.25877225,0.00066271704,0.000043705862,0.00007810308,0.00007301715,0.53853196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803438,0.0016476935,0.0016880836,0.0069219545,0.00022832201,0.000021028123,0.0000111238605,0.000023745639,0.009114205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936511,0.0034690707,0.00023489153,0.00072322227,0.0012357243,0.00068602624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479973,0.003103923,0.0004931667,0.0010307552,0.00031756598,0.0002548215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064427247,0.00029085606,0.00035936967,0.00065284735,0.007704187,0.006388363,0.0009871193,0.0056115235,0.0035042095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009594642,0.00032878856,0.0003401917,0.000593651,0.062388398,0.008560019,0.0055586556,0.0059811748,0.00032044214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048371307,0.0000025615439,0.00027893047,0.000009692127,0.0000019050686,0.00021068595,0.0076746163,0.000069439695,0.0000499538,0.9871594,0.0015170473,0.003021044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014524305,0.000018896964,0.0019252233,0.00036656926,0.000014984085,0.0013992166,0.017967455,0.0007600578,0.0005190014,0.8489266,0.12804641,0.000041008083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024684861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020555701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024684861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064729643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043573813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04908234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553335236","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3860","title":"De-Ciphering Self-Help","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Scholarship; Government (linguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.011420178437838158,"score_gpt":0.23900912723153353,"score_spread":0.22758894879369537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553335236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043909233,0.018926658,0.04497491,0.2781533,0.0044414513,0.00014276586,0.000098323675,0.00030434565,0.609049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8371899,0.01027788,0.010795786,0.052742958,0.0022062692,0.0002174435,0.00006980175,0.00025101937,0.08624888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157965,0.004460559,0.0003057719,0.0008912176,0.0017680727,0.0009946922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994948,0.0021647706,0.00063485716,0.0007729351,0.00083013077,0.00064925663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065097683,0.0004958634,0.0004744586,0.0012256217,0.004192412,0.008422566,0.0011434958,0.004154034,0.0053034592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010536635,0.00024005279,0.00049409806,0.0006366222,0.043094516,0.008542977,0.008363238,0.007906439,0.0018542495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008958233,0.000013395727,0.00023680092,0.000054608015,0.0000033287092,0.00007415797,0.01133496,0.000058920577,0.00013662613,0.97101396,0.008362464,0.00870168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017496828,0.000050277074,0.0006004025,0.0005153513,0.0000115957955,0.00039829698,0.010163663,0.00038675865,0.0006836798,0.47530326,0.5118424,0.000026784202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031524203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005198859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008422566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052502076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006830405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03809303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555205963","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4007","title":"The post-modern lawyer: Technology and the democratization of legal representation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Democratization; Legal process; Legal realism; Legal service; Political science; Livelihood; Law; Practice of law; Legal research; Legal ethics; Legal pluralism; Legal education; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.011318898144744405,"score_gpt":0.265649658808152,"score_spread":0.2543307606634076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555205963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14383277,0.01986395,0.03434748,0.13915488,0.0005659746,0.00006665221,0.00012560547,0.00035476204,0.661688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442692,0.006947719,0.008764511,0.0045115775,0.0007059832,0.00005317245,0.000047121255,0.00010558331,0.034595177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972983,0.0013257776,0.00009031465,0.00041238204,0.0005561265,0.00031705646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99324703,0.0038308275,0.0006550342,0.0014028396,0.00039133284,0.0004729651],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004902104,0.00018167983,0.00027952204,0.0016701657,0.0032663236,0.010928939,0.0009806855,0.0026630054,0.011733122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008680186,0.00029042046,0.00024799898,0.0013452863,0.02622391,0.011461307,0.0039342223,0.002888872,0.0016088585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002885788,0.00004173319,0.0015384867,0.000090165784,0.0000074669088,0.00013992506,0.012795164,0.0003364847,0.00077761133,0.9142898,0.0054162894,0.06453794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028790959,0.00007473776,0.006189025,0.00032195964,0.000010862345,0.0003871981,0.0074831485,0.0012021033,0.0015928729,0.5318507,0.4508206,0.00003799457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041267425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046577025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99673367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00568835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026728956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041272104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561364701","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.1","title":"MITIGATING STATE SOVEREIGNTY: THE DUTY TO CONSULT WITH INDIGENOUS PEOPLES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Sovereignty; Human rights; Duty to protect; Indigenous rights; Political science; Conceptualization; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.01102152311945175,"score_gpt":0.23804451248450872,"score_spread":0.22702298936505697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561364701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24661,0.0040452597,0.021240627,0.19423828,0.0003401598,0.00007324082,0.000024981062,0.000053633004,0.5333738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866441,0.00058124895,0.0012831248,0.004697136,0.00004974157,0.00002963157,0.0000036160936,0.0000075072608,0.006703966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889774,0.00719999,0.0003074944,0.00069447164,0.0013406427,0.001480075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988193,0.007353536,0.00084104965,0.000650778,0.0007132323,0.00055947603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011593859,0.0001650069,0.0002961598,0.000721938,0.0142681915,0.007958282,0.0012672577,0.006165041,0.0030777184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014929543,0.00023939452,0.0002983789,0.00060728536,0.052143283,0.006781377,0.010768418,0.006125617,0.00020336412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003974287,0.00001003562,0.00076010934,0.000038499755,0.0000030794206,0.00034599158,0.1308125,0.000093206865,0.00018761822,0.8610245,0.0015521137,0.0051682824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016082604,0.00004832695,0.003856931,0.0010566328,0.000032305838,0.00087000383,0.21839093,0.001087091,0.0010072783,0.55649567,0.21707901,0.00005990356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05114641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051421434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073454236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012707264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101697445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572350151","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4216","title":"Why judges should dissent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Political science; Judicial opinion; Transparency (behavior); Law; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.04189442167510912,"score_gpt":0.29010924771984514,"score_spread":0.24821482604473602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572350151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124169275,0.0070995307,0.04003694,0.4817887,0.011811555,0.00026520572,0.0001057002,0.0004981241,0.33422506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84984076,0.0009989414,0.008662709,0.110878706,0.0022591313,0.00019743375,0.000059969243,0.0002479758,0.026854435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9523303,0.018956134,0.0018170053,0.005958018,0.014133461,0.0068051172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95539945,0.02202543,0.0032777553,0.0031305982,0.011815081,0.004351639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028714912,0.00048130576,0.00053893845,0.0013140504,0.010960177,0.0074377693,0.0018003149,0.009875551,0.0048662396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109528735,0.0006734264,0.0005982048,0.0006079803,0.020902945,0.0049760845,0.0050161188,0.009782947,0.0030175995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012817985,0.00008773435,0.011392401,0.00021478452,0.0000767521,0.0021442883,0.050367873,0.00061755534,0.0028330653,0.6357072,0.23392487,0.06250533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001651153,0.000086755346,0.007624449,0.00048270813,0.000043005337,0.0009338214,0.026583469,0.0010122899,0.0026283534,0.55504537,0.4052121,0.00018250002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007598218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011161504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028714912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004633508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006505995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15186077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576008894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4217","title":"Ten theses on dissent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028879671997048793,"score_gpt":0.27744498722907146,"score_spread":0.24856531523202266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576008894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030070024,0.010962035,0.007056607,0.76920336,0.044893723,0.000108675806,0.00017092134,0.00009985091,0.1644978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20060384,0.014222365,0.009161825,0.58385843,0.058511656,0.0010426656,0.00028229383,0.00024227456,0.13207461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816108,0.008300009,0.0010956648,0.0013537555,0.005956007,0.0016837477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449323,0.03637093,0.0022693828,0.0028954367,0.010181008,0.0033510146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017758686,0.00084399316,0.0009471384,0.0032754024,0.009870325,0.010158725,0.003968174,0.013118746,0.01016555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047465846,0.00047176424,0.0014049252,0.002521681,0.03028583,0.0104628885,0.008201156,0.018844217,0.0024448608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024582147,0.00006215947,0.0003344433,0.00008277358,0.0000054849816,0.00006878249,0.0025644822,0.000048596583,0.000042765278,0.8183625,0.16892026,0.009483171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000206773,0.000034410852,0.0008349852,0.00035626322,0.000008525865,0.00009016525,0.0059253406,0.0002264628,0.00020589214,0.30329558,0.68896353,0.00003814321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007183316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012897468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017758686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007651075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071312236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093918025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577250387","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4041","title":"Commodification and the allocation of care and responsibility for children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Nexus (standard); Context (archaeology); Cash; Sociology; Law and economics; Public relations; Business; Political science; Economics; Economy; History","score_opus":0.033296371499663045,"score_gpt":0.3238004875552276,"score_spread":0.2905041160555646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577250387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61703813,0.003063934,0.0102722,0.031538907,0.00012584742,0.00010243565,0.0000214952,0.000021013211,0.33781615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996121,0.00030900718,0.00057893165,0.0004378261,0.000014565059,0.000027939735,0.0000022081808,0.0000037973236,0.0025045497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894392,0.005865543,0.0004702516,0.00080761395,0.0013060638,0.002111263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994871,0.0031342625,0.00090753194,0.00048451303,0.00023764028,0.00036504245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006127821,0.0003716757,0.00033959755,0.00095561624,0.0127813285,0.0066135223,0.0013259491,0.0033841,0.0028663734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011218385,0.00042265654,0.00040533475,0.00080981106,0.06877558,0.0057107788,0.014348517,0.0037881953,0.0001259454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010377474,0.000011788762,0.0024315158,0.000020527696,0.0000045496863,0.0011748616,0.050176274,0.00024912687,0.00013531533,0.9410289,0.0005823904,0.0041744118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006751856,0.0001147938,0.012889741,0.0012325747,0.000059337734,0.00716907,0.23272327,0.0019321658,0.0018990964,0.61009,0.13170972,0.000112865986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03047866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029751593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03047866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015105565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007001219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109599054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577385108","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016r3","title":"How to end mass imprisonment: The legal and cultural strategies of Bryan Stevenson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Mass incarceration; Law; Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Life imprisonment; Criminal justice; Legislature; Prison; Sociology","score_opus":0.016056524630071296,"score_gpt":0.26575665211865734,"score_spread":0.24970012748858605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577385108","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012984033,0.21576515,0.0031983,0.6944567,0.007054243,0.000031878393,0.000015185368,0.000035066572,0.066459395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46330103,0.24794579,0.0043734545,0.2506893,0.0045381333,0.00011274969,0.000030499446,0.00015569106,0.028853422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99086225,0.006038813,0.00033687297,0.00043504566,0.0016659851,0.0006611057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98916453,0.006929417,0.0006182584,0.00034852486,0.0020714724,0.0008678441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01080497,0.00028956833,0.00044148578,0.0012548036,0.0057341955,0.008694941,0.0013182033,0.0038013745,0.0016250389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017450102,0.00025845648,0.00025504315,0.0011579903,0.015723223,0.0083638895,0.0031116903,0.0065534366,0.0003278758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023973731,0.000038070375,0.0005297898,0.0005577147,0.000017537785,0.00024170049,0.032472644,0.00020536988,0.00032484723,0.728459,0.16552238,0.07160702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059748354,0.000036852132,0.00076390273,0.0019917442,0.00001632793,0.00016603059,0.017344365,0.00010228896,0.00036548072,0.0705084,0.9086611,0.0000375496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02712488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06876892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02712488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008716768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016593512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06324482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578643190","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3883","title":"Against racial profiling","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Racial profiling; Inference; Officer; Profiling (computer programming); Psychology; Criminology; Presupposition; Exclusionary rule; Social psychology; Race (biology); Political science; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.026716426334872697,"score_gpt":0.23611097618504887,"score_spread":0.20939454985017616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578643190","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02537902,0.008027665,0.0121070985,0.55436003,0.0036506564,0.000109396664,0.00014598879,0.00013252521,0.39608768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63222724,0.00569722,0.006790001,0.29033864,0.0040452927,0.00025675134,0.000105898216,0.00024287292,0.06029616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96921647,0.015504398,0.00077659555,0.003947089,0.0074117933,0.003143786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95793456,0.021602336,0.003728093,0.005694147,0.007568077,0.003472785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03878057,0.0007614082,0.0011098984,0.0015983583,0.016129345,0.008551766,0.0021405027,0.015209526,0.006590661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061224546,0.00069903897,0.00074889924,0.0013158777,0.041637078,0.008537749,0.009354529,0.02134735,0.0017913977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031994132,0.000010903845,0.0017496388,0.000058137564,0.000013540296,0.000114514434,0.01314384,0.000120469114,0.00011069933,0.91335464,0.048024394,0.023267262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005807201,0.00005302879,0.004773554,0.0012325501,0.000082551625,0.0005254524,0.010185131,0.0009457484,0.0008842271,0.31387255,0.6672865,0.00010062443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10358366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10637739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10358366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009416058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013145554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20596147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579109160","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4262","title":"The role of dissents in appellate judging","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Concurrence; First amendment; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.010881212267710706,"score_gpt":0.24792491752561457,"score_spread":0.23704370525790386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579109160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20272584,0.008644003,0.038377292,0.14484625,0.002942451,0.00018190702,0.00006118802,0.000105084306,0.602116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98157966,0.00053328753,0.0039055801,0.006528794,0.0006855383,0.00006824727,0.0000074313407,0.000027554433,0.006663867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86459136,0.087654665,0.005671315,0.008481427,0.02580244,0.0077987984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74566996,0.21232994,0.0137393195,0.007292646,0.014647096,0.006321083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.095376655,0.00045448547,0.0007876592,0.0029924575,0.017092766,0.013382597,0.002433847,0.008841366,0.0053935647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24571733,0.00062308245,0.00069501024,0.001818252,0.044629533,0.012227197,0.0126624685,0.010554033,0.0006749504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090520065,0.000045100845,0.0045781382,0.000109169094,0.000030889674,0.0008295382,0.03460458,0.00037839948,0.00029662758,0.9267307,0.005227002,0.027079305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010525969,0.0000949273,0.00814706,0.00046107778,0.000037594084,0.000572894,0.024495913,0.0014488049,0.0010903198,0.88732463,0.07608994,0.00013166311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006229455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010927525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095376655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064641847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007844343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.504406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591591668","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.6","title":"THE AUTHORITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Principle of legality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019544201955677,"score_gpt":0.29297163796962145,"score_spread":0.2734274360139444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591591668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008172484,0.016857289,0.014365442,0.14709853,0.0018440378,0.000042938012,0.000103917875,0.00007733413,0.8114379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8257776,0.0070552374,0.004599612,0.026712952,0.003312547,0.00014803419,0.00008808489,0.00010506099,0.13220084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914792,0.00400653,0.00025234197,0.0019308683,0.0015143618,0.0008166308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958187,0.0021145819,0.00037076604,0.0007769678,0.0006086878,0.0003104814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062992494,0.00056799635,0.0004382678,0.0013399062,0.005182298,0.010728365,0.0012172421,0.0051477295,0.011720362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01006641,0.00033616688,0.000450248,0.0009226921,0.0441197,0.009394414,0.0048334403,0.007871343,0.0018924159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002277233,0.000001716657,0.000033128286,0.0000069596263,0.0000010633908,0.00001012187,0.0006081199,0.000025580373,0.000016957993,0.99403507,0.0033332536,0.001925823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079317315,0.000011464122,0.00021308,0.00012747757,0.000003578263,0.000050757197,0.0005577331,0.00014375096,0.00008588798,0.76063746,0.2381503,0.000010577593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060652927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044551254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011720362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060900445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047843065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044186592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593517378","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.7","title":"IS THE PRINCIPAL FUNCTION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO ADDRESS THE PATHOLOGIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW? A COMMENT ON PATRICK MACKLEM’S <i>THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; International human rights law; Political science; International law; Principle of legality; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Public international law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05262080441488057,"score_gpt":0.32050096005471757,"score_spread":0.267880155639837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593517378","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035549554,0.0044043264,0.0016235271,0.9593471,0.0010762606,0.0000074814507,0.000031161715,0.000020669186,0.029934485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33689347,0.0049680793,0.002824947,0.6163971,0.006614356,0.00010525751,0.00003712784,0.00012026691,0.032039393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354833,0.003071378,0.0002276928,0.0010986716,0.0012189524,0.0008350201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99049205,0.0061496436,0.0010316675,0.000454512,0.0012366934,0.0006354373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008135829,0.000635365,0.0007692409,0.00075104216,0.009454921,0.01067598,0.0026934864,0.01662136,0.0052602985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01979735,0.0005441378,0.0007759964,0.0017072188,0.037510812,0.011710988,0.0042630453,0.020407105,0.0011852838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018053443,0.000005185892,0.00019498129,0.000069258735,0.0000056247463,0.00016477909,0.011954365,0.00008179717,0.00010247186,0.841404,0.14345792,0.0025414873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025104993,0.000029516495,0.0013717762,0.00048852933,0.000015951558,0.00046129312,0.014374943,0.00052499917,0.00047019395,0.30883965,0.67329293,0.00010498782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053946186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051931992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053946186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007896197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006915634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1072644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606015604","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016-0015","title":"Deliberative freedoms and the asymmetric features of anti-discrimination law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Affirmative action; Political science; Value (mathematics); Employment discrimination; Plaintiff; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.029045542333470994,"score_gpt":0.2887452390489362,"score_spread":0.25969969671546517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606015604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042708628,0.004511425,0.13384491,0.12497576,0.00079929095,0.000097008706,0.00016352018,0.0001632654,0.6927362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481755,0.0012105507,0.011008965,0.015168338,0.00087601313,0.00019328982,0.000057073135,0.00009656195,0.023213832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856462,0.006528321,0.0005292107,0.0019181527,0.0034000701,0.001978097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819426,0.011580393,0.0015073281,0.003095346,0.001202528,0.00067175936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01408743,0.00052631553,0.000740465,0.0013060842,0.0054438454,0.008398916,0.0020359482,0.007356491,0.007040153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018914426,0.00043060223,0.0013717741,0.0011576876,0.050294545,0.01296155,0.0064934385,0.009690518,0.00092601334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017782966,0.000002857085,0.00003960631,0.000005146683,0.0000014202893,0.000011471647,0.00022917904,0.00009366758,0.000013364741,0.9985556,0.00044783784,0.0005981858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006124493,0.00000303174,0.00006990247,0.000017698838,0.0000015695974,0.000013290222,0.00006789157,0.0002558997,0.000046228273,0.99077636,0.008737184,0.000004789767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003887692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027528233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01408743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006269641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004052076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07450229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625816929","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.9","title":"POSITIVISM AND PRACTICE BEYOND SOVEREIGNTY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Sovereignty; International law; Political science; Law; Legal positivism; International human rights law; Normative; Politics; Law and economics; Multinational corporation; Positivism; State (computer science); Sociology; Legal profession; Legal realism","score_opus":0.015485124074292273,"score_gpt":0.28586992215848017,"score_spread":0.2703847980841879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625816929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010066484,0.009765736,0.02028355,0.45950285,0.0031307477,0.000023642682,0.000042172727,0.00007795217,0.49710682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8454435,0.008223064,0.0048668263,0.06040946,0.005953661,0.0001600633,0.00006235727,0.00022138713,0.07465973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910488,0.005574096,0.0002663265,0.00092065166,0.0012550696,0.00093513867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868925,0.009668641,0.00054013793,0.0013996951,0.0009616294,0.0005374244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009386722,0.00055147376,0.0006965844,0.0011449804,0.0068378104,0.013892903,0.0019427689,0.0082372,0.007297318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014287304,0.00037122314,0.0007716292,0.00151181,0.0696595,0.015768537,0.006533908,0.015431273,0.0013343069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8704636e-7,0.0000021902297,0.000020169233,0.000007470136,6.146422e-7,0.0000081610215,0.001984839,0.000024091301,0.000007122421,0.9952237,0.0022825943,0.0004383931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074552686,0.0000073116844,0.000071311646,0.00011319338,0.000001972889,0.000034037384,0.0030332084,0.0001520845,0.00006445254,0.8722335,0.124275945,0.000005572174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061446377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005650963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013892903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008118455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007580265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058903754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626596183","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0044","title":"Law as computation in the era of artificial legal intelligence: Speaking law to the power of statistics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Argumentation theory; Artificial intelligence; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Legal research; Philosophy of law; Legal profession; Computer science; Practice of law; Political science; Comparative law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03252342726147227,"score_gpt":0.3224076401534819,"score_spread":0.2898842128920096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626596183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01773682,0.07269556,0.12869544,0.6004749,0.0032917238,0.000031164876,0.00017894035,0.00028454003,0.17661095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85697085,0.04190252,0.038883828,0.03052102,0.009043235,0.000116886724,0.00012257032,0.0002999447,0.022139156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954021,0.0025656822,0.00014799541,0.00038882275,0.001166273,0.00032910868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98178655,0.014860479,0.0007144354,0.0012747647,0.0008029707,0.0005608609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008412202,0.0003417364,0.0006723618,0.00198119,0.0045276172,0.011792748,0.0010999553,0.0048065265,0.0026767382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021045731,0.0004830221,0.00047763844,0.0025878844,0.05690033,0.020730298,0.0033138853,0.0073482576,0.0006395348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027294668,0.0000021772626,0.000060038088,0.0000107996175,0.0000013212921,0.0000111468125,0.00053357676,0.00021928726,0.000016921686,0.9936754,0.0028022325,0.002664385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020247087,0.0000027193905,0.00007237383,0.000032655804,0.0000012350644,0.000010161907,0.00019714999,0.00059233245,0.00003077026,0.9778201,0.021233251,0.0000052292503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012187529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010789051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012187529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008020707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005896372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058194637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726852703","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0025","title":"A right to deliberative freedom: Reply to Campbell and Smith","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Commit; Injustice; Action (physics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030717578137828588,"score_gpt":0.2920036532704029,"score_spread":0.2612860751325743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726852703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001871149,0.0018315993,0.00022696401,0.9938226,0.0019560305,0.000003141643,0.000015065197,0.000009821274,0.0019475672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015314102,0.001880704,0.0005868007,0.9694063,0.0077896016,0.000046049267,0.00001405522,0.00004316269,0.004919228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862831,0.0066411705,0.00048281482,0.002103442,0.0033899632,0.0010995475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454993,0.04018691,0.0019904107,0.0019923402,0.0075538936,0.0027771813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018556332,0.0007919442,0.0016722525,0.0013085352,0.007307778,0.008190172,0.005388632,0.060798448,0.008174893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061312992,0.00095966965,0.0012438465,0.002055709,0.023762764,0.015914753,0.0053518233,0.061430693,0.0028049187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027289894,0.000016250366,0.000108319815,0.000077587174,0.000010670338,0.000099103854,0.0012424721,0.00018681015,0.000056325047,0.17080538,0.82413006,0.0032396463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008826746,0.000025979556,0.00042126555,0.00069045025,0.000024841742,0.0002103316,0.0030173121,0.0006937617,0.00036265177,0.3558475,0.63848704,0.00013061753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027890055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02429505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060798448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014768164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015470348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10715103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727723761","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0053","title":"Warming up to inscrutability: How technology could challenge our concept of law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Legitimacy; Principle of legality; Law and economics; Political science; Coercion (linguistics); Strengths and weaknesses; Intelligibility (philosophy); Law; Deception; Legislation; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044169528776786246,"score_gpt":0.32710228554090787,"score_spread":0.2829327567641216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727723761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030612633,0.011127624,0.11029818,0.5443224,0.0019329498,0.00008249261,0.000074235744,0.0001595041,0.30138993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92804706,0.004074592,0.01806153,0.029957665,0.0016657604,0.00016620637,0.000034505123,0.00020492886,0.017787734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97670084,0.015858725,0.00054712675,0.0022011294,0.0032202275,0.0014719855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9547441,0.034215983,0.0015339641,0.0042005125,0.0035717282,0.0017336993],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03342329,0.0005932895,0.00095472124,0.0026461934,0.01084678,0.018493433,0.00283945,0.015140331,0.0058976575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042705763,0.0006819915,0.0010403458,0.0014291056,0.13665937,0.02988217,0.0087087825,0.016319249,0.0009280899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046205696,0.000004263546,0.000074266965,0.000011751949,0.0000026940645,0.000045274737,0.0021733753,0.00019966459,0.000044845103,0.9951563,0.0008901121,0.0013928204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008735246,0.00001135291,0.00007635177,0.00006641836,0.0000037365514,0.000054905235,0.0015733856,0.00042015847,0.000121515666,0.9645393,0.03310778,0.0000161954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012787351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073303315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015508328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009550996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17676139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728244694","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r2","title":"<scp>abraham drassinower</scp> <i>What’s Wrong with Copying?</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.012816995225184417,"score_gpt":0.23019160042814166,"score_spread":0.21737460520295723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2728244694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006201804,0.010509088,0.00023816824,0.871409,0.026723128,0.000019040624,0.0003992463,0.0001223615,0.08995976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023716945,0.0092998985,0.00048765895,0.617328,0.02422448,0.000088576,0.0004825303,0.00048774964,0.32388422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967871,0.00064726034,0.00017660257,0.00034019194,0.0015930666,0.00045582335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837573,0.0061880597,0.00072091265,0.000847765,0.006711258,0.0017746978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027277002,0.0005805743,0.0007299947,0.0018799657,0.010707543,0.008128472,0.0017687373,0.01291108,0.05446202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029944964,0.00048209942,0.0005237395,0.0021245051,0.0042058453,0.006780362,0.0031400733,0.01201962,0.017663764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029731937,0.0000013719635,0.000062140985,0.000018164188,0.0000013503623,0.000021888267,0.00021558303,0.000004903473,0.000016735663,0.003083519,0.99355316,0.0030181273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031180452,0.0000026035182,0.0005843367,0.00021855079,0.0000038514913,0.00005965867,0.0017763859,0.000023166363,0.000083707404,0.003848048,0.99338394,0.000012539541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088837154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20118934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088837154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057312115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005039773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18219358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750682743","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.0","title":"INTRODUCING PATRICK MACKLEM, <i>THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS</i>: FOUR CONTEXTS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Sovereignty; International human rights law; International law; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public international law; Principle of legality; Skepticism; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.01580124053682205,"score_gpt":0.2647988976038668,"score_spread":0.24899765706704477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750682743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01180405,0.11465577,0.011698876,0.34786314,0.008337233,0.0001155937,0.00026055233,0.00021387877,0.50505084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3932102,0.106727585,0.015574459,0.11576663,0.019350717,0.00072823465,0.0003609113,0.00054759276,0.34773365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903417,0.0003832922,0.000026494848,0.00014827133,0.00025578975,0.00015200912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990909,0.00047668655,0.00011127002,0.000038727667,0.0001522162,0.0001301757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008960454,0.0007591651,0.0003132095,0.0012388156,0.0063301516,0.008809103,0.0013197636,0.0035268406,0.0061381296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034927307,0.00047958925,0.0003853266,0.0018020562,0.010098091,0.010918479,0.0032512797,0.008953613,0.0016254437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001628036,0.000017464146,0.00021089552,0.0001769619,0.000003950005,0.00028828968,0.009878989,0.00014073774,0.000200544,0.6896937,0.28593317,0.0134391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048979364,0.000015487572,0.00049718184,0.00038702693,0.0000041926482,0.00027654265,0.004567863,0.00016948265,0.00013173292,0.13528845,0.8586336,0.000023514422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012029398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014856062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012029398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003988823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003289826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028941035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751690197","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.3","title":"THE USES AND LIMITS OF LEGALISM: ON PATRICK MACKLEM’S <i>THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; International human rights law; Political science; Sovereignty; International law; Legalism (Western philosophy); Reservation of rights; Principle of legality; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Politics; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022138986569685982,"score_gpt":0.2796053056703029,"score_spread":0.2574663191006169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751690197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007822022,0.046539962,0.0038398022,0.77681637,0.0019549078,0.000020623114,0.000036577327,0.000037801132,0.1629319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68453497,0.0537919,0.007225535,0.18291275,0.012344828,0.00021013411,0.000045158515,0.00023703108,0.05869775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906556,0.005913844,0.00020193995,0.00076014735,0.0017919337,0.0006764867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98693526,0.009683201,0.00068733527,0.00061066734,0.0014106715,0.0006729244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009887714,0.00059168437,0.0006554574,0.0021290043,0.011711904,0.014941792,0.0020817767,0.006500077,0.0026911101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013433639,0.0005398819,0.0004925905,0.0017529073,0.08161962,0.018945323,0.0070567788,0.011442758,0.0006752985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057320767,0.000005463611,0.00006925968,0.000035601,0.000001617442,0.00006809104,0.006581973,0.00004925445,0.000031351658,0.9667045,0.023219397,0.0032278935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010125576,0.000010224769,0.00030022932,0.00049778394,0.00000487373,0.00013678214,0.005865625,0.0002583065,0.000105199266,0.6834711,0.30930373,0.000036111243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032804858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031328786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032804858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009727943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068211956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070581496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751766599","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0098","title":"Parenthood is a fiduciary relationship","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Law; Possession (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Discretion; Sociology; Epistemology; Duty; Philosophy; Geography; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0440035289107704,"score_gpt":0.2702720190051765,"score_spread":0.2262684900944061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751766599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08518419,0.0038986048,0.015529098,0.033879396,0.00065911765,0.000066269386,0.00016088119,0.00007843378,0.860544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444222,0.0013734591,0.0020904497,0.0047412408,0.00013625303,0.000035657395,0.00004418652,0.000021478529,0.047135133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450666,0.0016868094,0.00017772533,0.0008146677,0.0013643325,0.001449864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996274,0.0011402501,0.0004616729,0.00032154348,0.0010954785,0.0007070841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044301273,0.00017434057,0.00028646956,0.0005545481,0.013576887,0.004766019,0.00085397647,0.002689599,0.008637711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008481577,0.00026364523,0.0002124907,0.0009262224,0.016048554,0.003989221,0.0034604163,0.0029346978,0.0010902502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007462989,0.000007723674,0.0020300045,0.000013194388,0.0000028139907,0.0002989476,0.015791412,0.00003097361,0.00009240154,0.9647614,0.0061654216,0.010798266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000206768,0.000040549163,0.011194154,0.00024945394,0.000020514659,0.0013370932,0.016532693,0.0002419465,0.00033293955,0.17072281,0.7992472,0.000059903952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2750198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33758447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2750198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011160189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017982513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54683805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752463403","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.4","title":"INTERNATIONAL LABOUR RIGHTS: LEGITIMIZING THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Globalization; Political science; Normative; International law; Labour law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Law; Order (exchange); International human rights law; Surrender; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.015372209847331482,"score_gpt":0.27139438449897346,"score_spread":0.25602217465164195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752463403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017438926,0.006962584,0.009233298,0.14461884,0.0011137823,0.000024542052,0.000049694558,0.000046485882,0.8205119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94310045,0.004457364,0.0021995564,0.015268392,0.0019780959,0.0000949995,0.000057594076,0.00007272037,0.032770716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909724,0.0036914716,0.0003410223,0.0013094782,0.0019137365,0.0017718751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924425,0.00384675,0.000704616,0.0014549188,0.00096380885,0.0005873824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009698735,0.00040309902,0.0006314083,0.0015136271,0.006245407,0.015210218,0.0014989725,0.0073974417,0.0076565435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018140133,0.00029517233,0.0004438702,0.0018101585,0.058375474,0.019560315,0.008126204,0.0094411215,0.0010597314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010321328,0.0000013049123,0.000039715986,0.0000037654677,4.147566e-7,0.000007973686,0.0010595804,0.0000125955785,0.000006684302,0.99723524,0.00057655026,0.0010552291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008457975,0.000008243771,0.00036750245,0.0002886094,0.000004313501,0.000051456933,0.004949733,0.0001452752,0.000097844975,0.8377894,0.1562792,0.0000098872615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016819196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01240472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016819196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081995465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008752195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05949211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752495212","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.2","title":"THE SOVEREIGNTY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Education, Technology, and Economics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Human rights; Law; International human rights law; Derogation; Political science; International law; Sovereignty; Municipal law; Public international law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013221514315147957,"score_gpt":0.22559015170309074,"score_spread":0.2123686373879428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752495212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04272839,0.025617732,0.014344275,0.33314306,0.0008924384,0.00003570569,0.00009388795,0.000055633565,0.5830888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945403,0.0065874998,0.0027935621,0.015892945,0.0006952566,0.00005449315,0.000045105546,0.00005223844,0.028475914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968168,0.0016269854,0.00010541905,0.000481816,0.0005226446,0.00044637042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962147,0.002356675,0.0003864198,0.00036660096,0.000434713,0.0002409806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004178752,0.00032676643,0.00040236497,0.0009991841,0.0047896905,0.009374,0.00075141375,0.003913468,0.0062407567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009867651,0.000291673,0.00032586892,0.0011393256,0.019403854,0.015806733,0.0036512967,0.004521597,0.00062769937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051782654,0.0000031926897,0.0001431535,0.0000142712615,0.000001589969,0.000030307461,0.0020225837,0.00007471554,0.000019665682,0.9903038,0.005070674,0.0023107575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067844558,0.000010731318,0.00062350096,0.00016327071,0.0000045379497,0.00008108497,0.0024706868,0.00036114693,0.00010996102,0.8802582,0.115892574,0.000017436032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011773643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00920619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011773643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004217162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033003497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030597806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753253894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.8","title":"HUMAN RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW? THE FORGOTTEN ORIGINS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Political science; Reservation of rights; International law; Right to property; Solidarity; Public international law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0224146321648271,"score_gpt":0.22995041688503107,"score_spread":0.20753578472020395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753253894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015886152,0.07030822,0.003954415,0.2447132,0.0010761211,0.000021790256,0.00004942812,0.000044449407,0.6639462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8068283,0.04003653,0.003072423,0.041285686,0.0025613073,0.0001461802,0.00006777284,0.0001575937,0.10584412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985312,0.0008684895,0.00002808177,0.00012172483,0.00014453073,0.00030594322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990374,0.00057981047,0.00012049034,0.00007649722,0.00010106756,0.000084721236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020260813,0.000424287,0.00034285616,0.0011577985,0.004040479,0.009541443,0.00081883505,0.0026109037,0.005200349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026704827,0.00021122556,0.00028206632,0.0017869336,0.02340777,0.008294045,0.0033259287,0.0047047315,0.00050836726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006432283,0.0000054519633,0.00020159516,0.000028073257,0.0000023929608,0.000060117934,0.009951254,0.000044167664,0.0000550106,0.9796158,0.004902754,0.0051269336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010387886,0.000010612768,0.0010491603,0.00052546384,0.0000049259297,0.00012065055,0.013681855,0.00012163776,0.00010193967,0.36052543,0.62382984,0.000018090912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016253656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012811941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016253656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068657384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024952486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04981464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753533019","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.5","title":"THE POLITICS OF INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS RIGHTS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Declaration; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Political science; International human rights law; Indigenous rights; Politics; Law; Right to property; Linguistic rights; Latin Americans; Negotiation; Fundamental rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.015373165803747504,"score_gpt":0.26151575339568883,"score_spread":0.24614258759194133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753533019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011375093,0.0037475943,0.00071229547,0.012414867,0.0001768403,0.0000063560565,0.000017325352,0.000015504462,0.9715341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8775946,0.0044304165,0.00086909323,0.0037297516,0.00044549053,0.0000492827,0.000032730943,0.000047160975,0.112801515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960433,0.001219137,0.00008878265,0.00048583004,0.0010536883,0.0011092158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987723,0.00045643622,0.00011907554,0.00020847826,0.00021814794,0.00022552712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028735825,0.00026523764,0.00023578845,0.0010027407,0.007610748,0.006963209,0.0006544988,0.0016542288,0.007475835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040844954,0.00015642233,0.00024764787,0.0013081116,0.020388858,0.0039498094,0.0049901856,0.0038625193,0.00050082325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021005865,0.0000026308592,0.00011023057,0.000010052562,0.0000013842727,0.000037420607,0.007215808,0.000029106423,0.000040176554,0.9864135,0.0029682338,0.003169537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008118555,0.000018530962,0.0024578318,0.00030049076,0.000013486063,0.00018639692,0.020205121,0.00019954474,0.00031961963,0.2356007,0.74067265,0.000017458971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045339104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036919523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045339104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008938445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005219281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090150416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765588717","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0012","title":"The definitive article","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Statute; Jurisdiction; Institution; Criminal jurisdiction; Criminal code; Criminal procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.03692326805195515,"score_gpt":0.3321777794202439,"score_spread":0.29525451136828873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765588717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083438284,0.009543811,0.0012359198,0.052697815,0.085353814,0.00024094271,0.0030081628,0.00045804415,0.84662706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065992926,0.006721203,0.0010233814,0.02739193,0.014027696,0.000141942,0.0028068784,0.000275685,0.94101197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978586,0.00030311267,0.00011523086,0.00040034382,0.0010558183,0.00026689892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545884,0.0006991357,0.00020410762,0.0008667929,0.0019396022,0.00083152077],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020098274,0.00049485744,0.0006407858,0.0015328367,0.0025344566,0.0075752875,0.0016673458,0.0054071564,0.46080503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010453863,0.00036822332,0.00085901393,0.0013613098,0.0016151905,0.004030471,0.0027217346,0.0039477125,0.25833756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017484734,0.00002563309,0.00014180821,0.00014920007,0.0000050763374,0.000055798588,0.000048123275,0.00002289714,0.000118192205,0.023108704,0.94023526,0.03607186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034447564,0.000005688908,0.00013921884,0.000079066805,0.0000019829,0.000034882567,0.000040096784,0.000007883254,0.00005264228,0.0014637855,0.9981686,0.000002683063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046301708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064736484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46080503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00292606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063476046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7690962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766014730","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017.67.4.r1","title":"MANAGING THE GOVERNANCE GAP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Operationalization; Human rights; Due diligence; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Ex-ante; Corporate social responsibility; Political science; Liability; Law; State (computer science); Closing (real estate); Public international law; Business; International law; Economics","score_opus":0.019640618463702908,"score_gpt":0.19421891205855069,"score_spread":0.17457829359484778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766014730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03481382,0.07091219,0.07457131,0.418921,0.005444667,0.00020841375,0.00012713764,0.00035874484,0.39464265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79988885,0.034947127,0.012229587,0.09052723,0.0038180975,0.0004229039,0.00019300156,0.00026053484,0.0577127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885958,0.0047575594,0.00051441253,0.0014756859,0.0026457037,0.0020108074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818029,0.009692065,0.0017586041,0.0022549676,0.0022469778,0.0022445414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014753082,0.00038397202,0.0006863216,0.0017123406,0.005885193,0.013503034,0.002186783,0.0070001814,0.0076956027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02364314,0.00043728919,0.00051357475,0.0017648462,0.01840801,0.022047104,0.013865519,0.009117931,0.0011958948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032591822,0.000008428736,0.00037093318,0.000090650035,0.0000056221966,0.00009094072,0.0029961737,0.00021243896,0.00007112862,0.9582273,0.016210638,0.021712516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007563356,0.000016545635,0.0006202981,0.0008218872,0.000007977221,0.00013984933,0.004909792,0.00034940054,0.00014770034,0.5006916,0.49227515,0.000012323424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005589787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061454736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014753082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009801382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020161176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07802272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766092601","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0028","title":"Thinking like a private lawyer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Relation (database); Tort; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Centrality; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy; Liability; History","score_opus":0.021583469122099904,"score_gpt":0.27689184325087796,"score_spread":0.25530837412877805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766092601","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013606789,0.019949377,0.02668688,0.54856956,0.0056347,0.000041231462,0.00005554234,0.00018918408,0.38526675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6432096,0.01955945,0.009489493,0.15435384,0.0068371184,0.00009588948,0.00008796436,0.00017948613,0.1661872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951338,0.002217722,0.0001252391,0.0007823444,0.0011918979,0.0005490183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643195,0.0017521367,0.0003537055,0.00042672697,0.00046833814,0.00056709093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004630793,0.00025217855,0.00036902403,0.0006866153,0.004571698,0.010387113,0.00082249765,0.0071320166,0.01039829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084750755,0.00023455701,0.00033495075,0.00063784077,0.022942754,0.012493146,0.002904972,0.0077713393,0.0023697994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003475936,0.000013597592,0.00022251996,0.00005230531,0.0000046369087,0.000070658076,0.003858588,0.00008051733,0.000078746714,0.9519836,0.033385724,0.0102456845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063798107,0.000013733331,0.00028444474,0.00026938136,0.000005681258,0.0002489565,0.004990518,0.00024538985,0.00011918709,0.53395003,0.45985338,0.000012845974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002633572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041843276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01039829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031591135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006315415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034785748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767613032","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0052","title":"How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Work (physics); Legal profession; Affect (linguistics); Public relations; Law; Software; Computer science; Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.042783489009042025,"score_gpt":0.32148663866148397,"score_spread":0.2787031496524419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767613032","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019924462,0.022891842,0.013817385,0.52026856,0.0026316333,0.000083593026,0.00015898456,0.00013221856,0.42009133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86880636,0.018808804,0.012586744,0.050388064,0.0026629863,0.00013050549,0.0000872576,0.00014261247,0.046386592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874178,0.0070211873,0.00023101542,0.0012933427,0.0024315792,0.0016050452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98698306,0.0065242215,0.0006906182,0.0018072957,0.0021988559,0.0017958188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014511112,0.00052489946,0.00051010714,0.0016624532,0.008657804,0.015952077,0.0012786295,0.008618664,0.007658479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019628514,0.00047718178,0.0005179002,0.0012402578,0.064555705,0.013644156,0.00406228,0.0068438067,0.0015856972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011327019,0.000030772506,0.0008629799,0.000044190274,0.000014113719,0.00008814684,0.003818502,0.0006431015,0.000090715715,0.97250944,0.013553508,0.008333221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022000233,0.000022523456,0.0011623044,0.00021400169,0.000012460005,0.000064640575,0.002898971,0.0006438875,0.0001905072,0.72122586,0.27351573,0.000027143169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08189308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055177223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08189308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023786165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01836549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1725815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768011231","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0056","title":"Prediction, persuasion, and the jurisprudence of behaviourism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Jurisprudence; Predictive analytics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Meaning (existential); Software deployment; Analytics; Data science; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023314108959790494,"score_gpt":0.2745674372997067,"score_spread":0.2512533283399162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768011231","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14043686,0.014226147,0.11086471,0.45281598,0.0011261052,0.00010423216,0.00015120993,0.0002098187,0.28006503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849282,0.0012652896,0.0051371306,0.006348848,0.00040648066,0.00004418881,0.000021576201,0.000034622266,0.00181361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.963824,0.024647648,0.0009224087,0.0030316797,0.0061290436,0.0014453117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9063129,0.07677279,0.0059067993,0.004937851,0.0047515775,0.0013182051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03355341,0.00045794412,0.0006793406,0.002156295,0.0037228086,0.00927097,0.0020051112,0.0071091703,0.0017624409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072981946,0.0003677839,0.0006562618,0.0014543335,0.054359205,0.0067596077,0.0040474217,0.00911651,0.00031742646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800398,0.00001796347,0.0016947268,0.000046437726,0.000015865833,0.00008601941,0.0040322486,0.0011986113,0.000059025686,0.98166096,0.0024564608,0.008713566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015629257,0.0000151317045,0.0014168534,0.00014218535,0.000009555704,0.00005495018,0.0009619811,0.003292618,0.00012499109,0.9802285,0.013716828,0.000020887886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009889851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057702586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03355341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007662897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048511177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17744952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768384443","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0075","title":"The banishment of Isaac: Racial signifiers of gender performance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Harm; Ethnic group; Transgender; Sociology; Reading (process); Race (biology); Construct (python library); Gaze; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021118522644930457,"score_gpt":0.24558049977424562,"score_spread":0.22446197712931515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768384443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26227093,0.0019884484,0.008942994,0.029058568,0.00073837704,0.00004259408,0.00004272133,0.000055412984,0.6968599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98087764,0.00018185958,0.00066648034,0.0013766558,0.000088893794,0.000014759151,0.000006782993,0.000011949396,0.016774923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736506,0.0011088186,0.000081471204,0.00026722322,0.00061400735,0.00056352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781597,0.00094547507,0.0002983044,0.0003672615,0.00042248567,0.00015046509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034182877,0.0003091378,0.00032753623,0.0007343853,0.009550545,0.004563323,0.0008709813,0.0030026196,0.0033785515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052740094,0.00022944457,0.00023451853,0.00037261835,0.03419538,0.0028957743,0.003498887,0.0045906203,0.0003401601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144773185,0.000006808563,0.00069806876,0.000012288475,0.0000017414276,0.00012163202,0.034270152,0.000030719297,0.0003057884,0.9597811,0.0012917487,0.0034654413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003712438,0.0002351252,0.014926275,0.0004594138,0.00006387298,0.001040312,0.1186013,0.0009801491,0.006619585,0.35313517,0.50378877,0.00011289546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039272945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05651341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039272945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047793756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037161896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0780887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782332759","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0102","title":"Introduction: Artificial intelligence, technology, and the law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Democracy; Economic Justice; Legal research; Legal writing; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Legal profession; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021076920366314835,"score_gpt":0.2759681546717757,"score_spread":0.2548912343054609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782332759","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011322675,0.4368556,0.003157913,0.16852519,0.06523354,0.000080140875,0.0015979366,0.0001888839,0.32322848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042944912,0.31443816,0.004576793,0.07500905,0.0996453,0.0001874352,0.0017225014,0.0003201813,0.4611557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993304,0.00015607016,0.00003799872,0.000096115094,0.00029426508,0.00008515017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985311,0.00079418125,0.00006207965,0.00008772846,0.00031525028,0.00020963396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007143129,0.0009902932,0.00059108296,0.0021774077,0.0027467126,0.0055257548,0.00077174394,0.0039966265,0.033690564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017848434,0.0004753613,0.00041743892,0.0024061713,0.004247206,0.0031076253,0.0014927896,0.005870855,0.007086917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014600224,0.000013938356,0.00023580788,0.0003336113,0.0000072336006,0.00007634076,0.0011762632,0.0001231211,0.00012500156,0.14092098,0.8276832,0.029289946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016751566,0.0000060959064,0.0006041153,0.0003807797,0.0000019429656,0.00007480655,0.00024208792,0.00003636956,0.000016264588,0.015119758,0.98351073,0.0000052335445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023156496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035988055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033690564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058723437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032766496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112706184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783051054","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0080","title":"The origins of gender identity and gender expression in Anglo-American legal discourse","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Human rights; Identity (music); Law; Scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Human sexuality; Gender studies; Parliament; Expression (computer science); Politics","score_opus":0.0339511753438979,"score_gpt":0.3530585936606168,"score_spread":0.3191074183167189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783051054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44134077,0.03176355,0.0042513325,0.08039771,0.0014082204,0.000045111705,0.00006321021,0.000048733025,0.4406814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98623973,0.003448212,0.0004617805,0.003314711,0.00024921814,0.00002311196,0.000012937411,0.000026961852,0.006223232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933368,0.004624571,0.00016784159,0.00043787394,0.00069477106,0.0007382383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591225,0.0027298613,0.00038266843,0.00015531637,0.00040699428,0.0004129618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007969474,0.00038035796,0.00036135124,0.0025540323,0.022263963,0.012467876,0.0010460569,0.0029738052,0.0024186934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005144173,0.0003659096,0.00018200476,0.0020478736,0.061701268,0.009392133,0.0050527295,0.0053428197,0.00028927394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010398803,0.000013104353,0.00044177173,0.000026074564,0.0000014283534,0.00011341774,0.6404762,0.000010881827,0.00016191308,0.35246655,0.0013513229,0.0049268915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007846589,0.00003745934,0.0035076444,0.00057635247,0.000010374363,0.00029733355,0.70036155,0.00018323005,0.00037712025,0.06257773,0.23202468,0.000038643124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04064373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042272765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04064373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012313027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004602133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08933765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784182983","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0057","title":"Don’t be so hateful: The insufficiency of anti-discrimination and hate crime laws in improving trans well-being","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hate crime; Harassment; Emancipation; Law; Identity (music); Political science; Criminology; Racism; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015119211946833373,"score_gpt":0.27759004219038663,"score_spread":0.2624708302435533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784182983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2785026,0.006386618,0.0019166928,0.5838633,0.0008311323,0.000018649076,0.000018599345,0.000027743936,0.12843461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95832396,0.0017767836,0.00040846833,0.03094174,0.00010335038,0.0000091638,0.000004873629,0.000014327754,0.008417345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971059,0.0014937677,0.000071444614,0.00014838226,0.00044475275,0.0007357341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952756,0.0018949461,0.0006906861,0.0002886359,0.00048085686,0.0013693152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003949935,0.00016478552,0.00022707584,0.00038853104,0.008128652,0.0053671235,0.0005980466,0.0035959322,0.003342456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062978347,0.0001792683,0.00021806652,0.00034745145,0.023935763,0.0033358573,0.003842998,0.0061517353,0.00042649193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009877829,0.0002632945,0.02348173,0.00016624585,0.000026807158,0.0009836457,0.1436933,0.00014169836,0.0017071394,0.67044735,0.055278245,0.10371175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045631517,0.00038090837,0.071257405,0.0013517608,0.000102588805,0.0020582436,0.42327622,0.0009147701,0.0038389536,0.16767141,0.3290015,0.00010070699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050745208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089556485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050745208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050111734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005644274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1008997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784246330","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0073","title":"Gender identity, gender pronouns, and freedom of expression: Bill C-16 and the traction of specious legal claims","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Law; Political science; Politics; Legislature; Human rights; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Binary opposition; Freedom of expression; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012049845758129975,"score_gpt":0.20870440582891384,"score_spread":0.19665456007078386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784246330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3347487,0.011499217,0.005377981,0.11942831,0.00091170776,0.000039345734,0.00011462155,0.00003251887,0.5278476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98947805,0.0011067078,0.00038115805,0.0020130835,0.00012868685,0.000009473985,0.000018730836,0.000015348802,0.00684882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944165,0.0024901172,0.00015885665,0.0005279893,0.0015651758,0.00084138213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98962003,0.007065004,0.0011496987,0.0005707423,0.0010934853,0.00050099986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006398253,0.00035820284,0.0004167405,0.0021853298,0.01611434,0.012570741,0.0010607485,0.004238084,0.0033642696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014342409,0.0003678456,0.00021029274,0.0025731323,0.08176017,0.0069465605,0.004577181,0.0050873156,0.0003220884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024955476,0.000015781636,0.0032120217,0.000039705505,0.0000029458386,0.00023581437,0.20604545,0.00005307643,0.0001259906,0.77171063,0.004937694,0.013595861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029856401,0.00004072038,0.023987448,0.00079799176,0.000037342972,0.00059591635,0.43796146,0.00077407394,0.001211898,0.26093283,0.2735374,0.00009300991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27923816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33273563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72076184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021820795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01158826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5552256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785765963","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0021","title":"Group rights, participatory goods, and language policy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Public good; Law and economics; Citizen journalism; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.036511443260439716,"score_gpt":0.31385319758550745,"score_spread":0.27734175432506775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785765963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051040884,0.012211286,0.031523533,0.11300425,0.0006047141,0.00006911893,0.00011325394,0.00011631855,0.79131675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946152,0.002876253,0.0047356095,0.0068384893,0.00078898825,0.0001636632,0.0000611068,0.00009064676,0.038293306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904585,0.005964652,0.00022331392,0.0010386405,0.0010288402,0.0012860687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881059,0.008873475,0.0009187432,0.001017971,0.0005755135,0.0005084039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008030391,0.00054785406,0.00060190045,0.00193257,0.006372139,0.009035727,0.001689154,0.005162941,0.014980633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009894209,0.0003147382,0.0007149077,0.0019585795,0.033660542,0.016455939,0.007079766,0.0045917337,0.0015184105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045608836,0.000004564756,0.000043721706,0.000015466117,0.000001832917,0.000014849213,0.0010612669,0.00010689955,0.00003195105,0.9969002,0.00050583394,0.0013089197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015178765,0.000008839555,0.00014725314,0.00008767608,0.000004607135,0.000022033555,0.0011106611,0.00020450942,0.0001554685,0.9613132,0.036922384,0.00000826252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005441437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034676853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014980633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008287827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039510457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060132742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787245113","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0030","title":"Overcoming Dicey in administrative law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Administrative law; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Public law; Delegation; Legislature; Judicial review; Accountability","score_opus":0.033788770659844036,"score_gpt":0.310458407285915,"score_spread":0.27666963662607097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787245113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016800756,0.025688596,0.014413937,0.32481444,0.00317063,0.000044042463,0.00004771245,0.00017676495,0.61484325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66410697,0.01056277,0.00821433,0.089705616,0.0041913805,0.0002419383,0.00006615058,0.00030186443,0.22260906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007577,0.004616414,0.0003291583,0.0011779375,0.0023472195,0.0014535415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99000883,0.006467835,0.0005131419,0.0011064961,0.0012463595,0.00065731764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010024988,0.00048629782,0.0007590754,0.0025451898,0.012258087,0.020307066,0.002029056,0.008905687,0.006287786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021998426,0.00056814007,0.00061247434,0.0015946393,0.04738538,0.0193639,0.011129934,0.018041138,0.0011661446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002273151,0.0000031970535,0.00003978169,0.000009321047,8.1775624e-7,0.000028974442,0.002405626,0.00003840412,0.000009486279,0.9847888,0.010385972,0.0022873995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096067015,0.0000109138855,0.00017073996,0.00015718101,0.000002859359,0.00008952198,0.0036737719,0.00027123824,0.000104158564,0.5265167,0.46897584,0.000017471253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014094929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01822766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020747561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020747561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01183983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15053475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787708624","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0069","title":"The proper role of policy in private law adjudication","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Statutory law; Private law; Law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Politics; Law and economics; Opposition (politics); Sociology","score_opus":0.009596039025498703,"score_gpt":0.2588751311499375,"score_spread":0.24927909212443877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787708624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027061533,0.006229912,0.33022097,0.23585348,0.0015550586,0.00036249295,0.00013578002,0.00017624172,0.3984046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92440397,0.002688376,0.042713225,0.010485467,0.0010285082,0.00041145505,0.00004579798,0.00010900119,0.01811423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8859653,0.076287016,0.005908739,0.009175242,0.017776772,0.004887014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9087644,0.06758582,0.0042032474,0.010296274,0.0076902756,0.001460084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0845119,0.00062080973,0.0015185059,0.0023932855,0.0091117425,0.023629254,0.00330257,0.010898493,0.0031527577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08699067,0.0010683907,0.0009104013,0.0024149306,0.08264123,0.01874981,0.008788134,0.01401862,0.0011482353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029042783,0.0000042476886,0.000070706614,0.000013213169,0.0000017528633,0.000009681048,0.0007909188,0.00013120155,0.000031913034,0.9966613,0.00038131393,0.0019008717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001138807,0.000009980651,0.00014408567,0.000098716904,0.000005647593,0.000020243913,0.0005829068,0.0009501216,0.00028871448,0.98309845,0.014778405,0.00001129111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015052409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011030308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0845119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017636398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034398515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44694698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790078636","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0047","title":"Transformative legal technology and the rule of law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Economic Justice; Cognition; Rule of law; Law; Legal profession; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.006344534758098222,"score_gpt":0.22562990034735253,"score_spread":0.21928536558925432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790078636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10072213,0.00573067,0.071334034,0.017232979,0.00024209674,0.00005672668,0.00009457175,0.00020564499,0.8043811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773661,0.0013908384,0.008961526,0.0005705034,0.0001097667,0.00003689295,0.000032281667,0.00003224062,0.011499914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963258,0.0012989895,0.00017778913,0.00070262665,0.0011210588,0.00037364152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948137,0.0027039913,0.0006028681,0.0011542806,0.00045252097,0.00027263677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028568574,0.00024282758,0.0003467268,0.001362374,0.0016384762,0.0073542525,0.0009889577,0.0018133466,0.0050052945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077562993,0.00023915796,0.00035858274,0.0010260826,0.040355466,0.007540972,0.0026048806,0.002270339,0.0007575116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035936382,0.0000048166353,0.00009899561,0.000010200348,0.0000014092295,0.000020321713,0.0007186825,0.00030897427,0.00007119704,0.9951852,0.00021723553,0.0033593117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010045698,0.000009883194,0.00041003182,0.00003270005,0.0000031887266,0.000060803497,0.0004213055,0.00072577223,0.00024279265,0.9751956,0.022878531,0.00000937234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007112264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052133924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073542525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049671447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029376936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036039293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799704751","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0055","title":"Canadian legislatures and the regulation of the private health-care industry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Public administration; Health care; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01594424963709182,"score_gpt":0.21152415081458112,"score_spread":0.1955799011774893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799704751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029537812,0.0092129335,0.0060400967,0.31636614,0.0011344169,0.00015003528,0.00070706895,0.00014821634,0.6367033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7506296,0.007330426,0.007029127,0.11158691,0.00076655194,0.00017980684,0.00040617905,0.00011351994,0.12195781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741285,0.0031158612,0.0006271473,0.0017822958,0.013830567,0.0065155416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98394024,0.0052872803,0.0009979191,0.00091822556,0.0064968946,0.0023594492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101742335,0.0004570658,0.0005633477,0.0025220097,0.018669764,0.010515474,0.0023795494,0.007274411,0.005241317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021981511,0.00073682517,0.00079578673,0.0026907478,0.018082399,0.0023225734,0.0038846757,0.0076674847,0.00039661222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009210162,0.000008349598,0.0007615254,0.000031065567,0.000008007279,0.00005080311,0.0015437444,0.00029914538,0.00010801397,0.96379805,0.027608817,0.005773279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006793995,0.000026025213,0.012615535,0.0004174754,0.00006517914,0.00006301169,0.0025638011,0.0013405457,0.0003764364,0.12135758,0.86095744,0.00014894648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98648304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1375282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1375282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22662422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799817919","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0002","title":"Special advocates and amici curiae in national security proceedings in the United Kingdom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Perspective (graphical); Kingdom; Function (biology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02091117640454297,"score_gpt":0.2721191769183879,"score_spread":0.2512080005138449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799817919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4000492,0.032049693,0.0049705124,0.10182628,0.0020664707,0.0001756021,0.000054629556,0.000088659166,0.45871896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770678,0.0019343938,0.00075778906,0.008106841,0.00009717244,0.000048923477,0.000010956667,0.000021275227,0.011954854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97183293,0.015398118,0.0021241156,0.0014818595,0.004249094,0.004913857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9547053,0.031219985,0.0045183566,0.0015261936,0.0049533513,0.0030768407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018603645,0.0002425462,0.0005591247,0.0014983581,0.01470852,0.012999433,0.0012035273,0.010018715,0.003883613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053169314,0.0006534041,0.00044158116,0.0011406554,0.014985278,0.0046178387,0.011415536,0.0077919485,0.0004814893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014154868,0.000038892045,0.0062015275,0.00039018525,0.000028321347,0.004797409,0.0780006,0.0005531548,0.0008975087,0.86302745,0.019783165,0.02614015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001045642,0.0003381692,0.020738622,0.0028065776,0.00011957823,0.00258631,0.09702058,0.0010643204,0.0020956453,0.073869854,0.798961,0.00029490356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11900461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22497812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11900461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018111624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02542924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23662382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800000445","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0062","title":"Legal pluralism? Indigenous rights as legal constructs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Legal research; Human rights; Legal culture; Legal realism; Citizenship; Sociology; Right to property; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.007006730574619357,"score_gpt":0.2341439601458829,"score_spread":0.22713722957126353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800000445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107588306,0.013466452,0.025216011,0.10728748,0.00057480397,0.00004909435,0.000044810517,0.000057955778,0.74571514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98562926,0.0015295384,0.001997453,0.0018070971,0.0003357791,0.00003503827,0.000010951194,0.000012528812,0.00864226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940367,0.0028175246,0.00019718088,0.0008295697,0.0012237385,0.00089536345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947842,0.0028471618,0.0005764356,0.0007065059,0.0005416747,0.00054399285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075292327,0.00024918382,0.0005250213,0.0017551073,0.008320703,0.00802953,0.001566938,0.0037851282,0.0034490465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076245684,0.0002485114,0.00042353236,0.001385412,0.08900765,0.013384063,0.0078836,0.0053047375,0.00023367752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8021066e-7,0.0000026361636,0.00004889316,0.0000069411017,7.1274735e-7,0.000019182202,0.005874629,0.000026121501,0.000019343215,0.99307925,0.00014907283,0.0007724654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006876262,0.0000085229085,0.00031655477,0.000084497035,0.000004051203,0.00007421173,0.0077381646,0.0002125613,0.0000629107,0.95003223,0.041451607,0.000007842662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018202607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011177826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073228795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006475271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05313146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800134484","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0059","title":"The choices we make and the world they create: Métis conflicts with Treaty One peoples in <i>MMF v Canada</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; Battle; Supreme court; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.00655182880691618,"score_gpt":0.18519983515282307,"score_spread":0.17864800634590688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800134484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47173664,0.002324224,0.0024231365,0.11578456,0.0005103325,0.00008245454,0.00008517259,0.00003073251,0.40702266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97299767,0.00036907193,0.00032843347,0.008046265,0.000034224744,0.00002082335,0.000017287877,0.000026358503,0.018159812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875321,0.0032557661,0.00013192928,0.00075601,0.0025567121,0.0057675224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966876,0.00092486356,0.00028312593,0.00011204369,0.00052420225,0.0014682029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058266595,0.00039378894,0.00047335523,0.0013470555,0.09102853,0.024356952,0.0025465146,0.008758961,0.0048947684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007712101,0.0005081749,0.0005263569,0.0020363377,0.062032863,0.005524988,0.010394915,0.012837905,0.0003039768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018657272,0.00003320941,0.0033966375,0.000017067665,0.000012606601,0.0009743448,0.37089548,0.00018244737,0.00025119542,0.60408777,0.014550076,0.005580579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022929853,0.000018333265,0.0044012577,0.00018450212,0.00003074229,0.00027517855,0.6823339,0.000366108,0.00041778522,0.05670602,0.25512442,0.0001188012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9526243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12362382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12362382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11852128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89695776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800268292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0001","title":"Reforming the bifurcated process under section 38 of the Canada Evidence Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Principal (computer security); Political science; Process (computing); Criticism; Law; Privilege (computing); Law and economics; Relation (database); Business; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02897294672493908,"score_gpt":0.2765586495432078,"score_spread":0.24758570281826872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800268292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19020358,0.00406172,0.11441391,0.16508363,0.00178209,0.0058294446,0.0011397994,0.0007191594,0.5167667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8113213,0.0019529788,0.097808525,0.021995028,0.00030204322,0.001002725,0.00043535684,0.000094152514,0.06508784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9380023,0.010813804,0.0036119947,0.006607271,0.031711828,0.009252819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9270141,0.025339993,0.0036178934,0.006734683,0.032093562,0.0051996307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038479988,0.0005316201,0.0005764818,0.0041787303,0.011581915,0.0107286265,0.004255444,0.009971733,0.004607494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09183686,0.0010638204,0.00091602217,0.0035807157,0.0157057,0.005871369,0.0075323265,0.011691512,0.0013405891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049615093,0.000058144386,0.003150613,0.00006354757,0.000019476078,0.0003970546,0.0054050507,0.0019577262,0.0010239318,0.93948066,0.015838947,0.032555196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038304678,0.00028726662,0.020365179,0.0010866725,0.00015456193,0.00061703374,0.006933426,0.015859941,0.005361273,0.4363964,0.5119185,0.0006367049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7835121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84697175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21648788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06863821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36476612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49800742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800941461","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0084","title":"The residue of <i>imperium</i>: Property and sovereignty on Indigenous lands","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Property law; Business; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.008602484312042346,"score_gpt":0.2231545530912251,"score_spread":0.21455206877918273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800941461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21807398,0.0103235245,0.008868695,0.0441571,0.0004772843,0.000018528308,0.00008888288,0.000040458934,0.7179515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97402555,0.0015965584,0.00044793158,0.0010679412,0.00014836711,0.0000072111634,0.000009617338,0.000010923135,0.022685755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999169,0.000291845,0.000022629623,0.00007496414,0.00018303767,0.00025856524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993511,0.00027823064,0.00010659066,0.0000934873,0.00009621365,0.000074362404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010949188,0.00009787403,0.0001987775,0.00038811087,0.004438988,0.004862669,0.000666729,0.0013824728,0.002760598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020564818,0.00011820098,0.00015536427,0.00055125466,0.028482521,0.0029839934,0.0031906776,0.0024122957,0.00021946026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045341976,0.0000018729197,0.0003196788,0.000015666517,0.0000012507286,0.00007619049,0.012358584,0.000055542943,0.00011675541,0.98278093,0.0020047952,0.0022642564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015181438,0.000053470372,0.00972482,0.00034941756,0.000026583342,0.00044332916,0.034420367,0.0007994294,0.0011930137,0.61980844,0.33312434,0.0000416523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12589954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1789491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87410045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065688277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041243993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2503335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801425793","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0114","title":"The need to justify and limit procedural innovation in national security litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Legitimacy; Plaintiff; Value (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Procedural justice; Political science; State (computer science); Law; National security; Business; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.024272660860192585,"score_gpt":0.29378463912315755,"score_spread":0.26951197826296497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801425793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08101577,0.004083406,0.26237163,0.3764572,0.0015021702,0.0010479321,0.00009193715,0.00071369926,0.27271634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87085485,0.0011109816,0.08371419,0.03329447,0.0015052604,0.0010808993,0.000052950178,0.00018482326,0.008201496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.78330797,0.08465316,0.015821414,0.018890316,0.08552736,0.011799812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.512848,0.34675536,0.035084393,0.052528635,0.045406617,0.007377014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18169627,0.0007642822,0.0015496048,0.00383242,0.00905037,0.023685323,0.0067741163,0.029231038,0.0043609203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37028348,0.0012215595,0.0018342625,0.0017491106,0.059353154,0.028459186,0.013971855,0.025427705,0.0014837777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032508968,0.00008159794,0.0016973945,0.00014415637,0.00003444576,0.00009467323,0.002617402,0.0021019934,0.00073421764,0.968972,0.002782341,0.020707252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009077251,0.00016019588,0.0014910604,0.00085048244,0.000058164474,0.00017728128,0.0014968776,0.004918285,0.0019617241,0.94179714,0.046865497,0.00013248739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008063639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009043595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18169627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021131376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05288245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9609132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802889441","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0110","title":"Honour in sovereignty: Can Crown consultation with Indigenous peoples erase Canada’s sovereignty deficit?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Law; Honour; Duty; Politics; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.010372781011870804,"score_gpt":0.22271116260188928,"score_spread":0.21233838159001847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802889441","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1737029,0.010676855,0.001571156,0.47815877,0.0007493286,0.000059472062,0.0001760015,0.00006987522,0.3348357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415052,0.003315234,0.0007122482,0.034371547,0.00011578533,0.000016540174,0.0000439638,0.00002697318,0.019892426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418217,0.0007419338,0.00007269347,0.0003513579,0.0013507786,0.0033011588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921863,0.0021831917,0.0003454103,0.00018318092,0.0021450112,0.0029569063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003641287,0.00023168598,0.00037877692,0.0009725879,0.035620846,0.013098932,0.002370723,0.0063085454,0.008359897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124492245,0.00027074697,0.00029760046,0.0016662999,0.018793706,0.0062718876,0.006420031,0.00761923,0.00040131345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006607327,0.00007707882,0.017382659,0.0003018604,0.00003611447,0.001855174,0.1314015,0.0005803272,0.0007658518,0.6597267,0.11885595,0.0689507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004819342,0.00004250816,0.03991026,0.0012607257,0.00011500168,0.0004894706,0.2226383,0.0014258466,0.0008845797,0.090406716,0.64256525,0.00021320506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98723257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121906236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.121906236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28332803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8844958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807847431","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0012","title":"The migration and evolution of programs to counter violent extremism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Violent extremism; Political science; China; Accountability; State (computer science); Criminology; Focus (optics); Political economy; Terrorism; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0113711688348157,"score_gpt":0.2528563701314315,"score_spread":0.24148520129661577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807847431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5808583,0.005997163,0.019733312,0.06520159,0.00086204073,0.0010140263,0.00022861735,0.00041279753,0.3256922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96922934,0.0017309887,0.011849112,0.0033712946,0.00008337415,0.00027111714,0.000107397515,0.000049752376,0.013307617],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961802,0.0021892826,0.00008715692,0.00030674352,0.00050771976,0.00072901347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250495,0.0022473014,0.0010020483,0.0006179414,0.001719179,0.0019087301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006519972,0.00024744583,0.00014477746,0.0023957666,0.001888742,0.0030555048,0.0014845972,0.0012275074,0.0040303334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010310971,0.00021623375,0.00032755247,0.0011653845,0.0030827585,0.0017543781,0.0023424614,0.0015114882,0.00040259093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035147197,0.0023641393,0.026220197,0.00043900724,0.0000594936,0.00020443584,0.0073526264,0.0051268744,0.0016959467,0.24391998,0.013589096,0.69867676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057368923,0.0068800445,0.32415533,0.0022160583,0.00016152723,0.0006977055,0.039333683,0.018251885,0.0059878845,0.08196119,0.5196187,0.00016240258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019950328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030231826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98004967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008541859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010031138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061975777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808225335","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0074","title":"The architectural metaphor and the decline of political conventions in the Supreme Court of Canada’s <i>Senate Reform Reference</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Nomination; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Political question; Campaign finance; Federalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.014169028608343584,"score_gpt":0.24523895859791522,"score_spread":0.23106992998957165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808225335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13421574,0.0036174501,0.0057329326,0.076524876,0.00049294205,0.000040085368,0.00018932666,0.00012716114,0.7790594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957481,0.00051981903,0.0009279387,0.004939502,0.000047056707,0.000017475644,0.00003501696,0.00005108922,0.03598112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467695,0.0013757331,0.000080244834,0.00043680798,0.0017203207,0.0017100027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801373,0.00053251104,0.00013027505,0.00018349767,0.0007727574,0.0003672805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026173687,0.00032969037,0.0003312423,0.0015282072,0.039631877,0.015160416,0.0017889343,0.0038401226,0.0043381844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004919587,0.00037840605,0.00031047047,0.0024633843,0.0513486,0.0029519715,0.003376014,0.0064939307,0.00035900075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005100208,0.0000023570608,0.0003031723,0.0000068657573,0.0000016437936,0.000087398774,0.014777929,0.0001447612,0.00010903717,0.97688216,0.0055478173,0.0021317387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036465375,0.000019217881,0.0064397906,0.00020207994,0.000029222028,0.00018267287,0.045610636,0.0011298138,0.00077038235,0.17839967,0.7670406,0.00013929661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109248936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109248936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08996024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79266024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808336711","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0010","title":"Counterterrorism on campus","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Terrorism; Radicalization; Political science; Academic freedom; Obligation; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Statutory law; Law; Power (physics); Duty to protect; Sociology; Public administration; Higher education; Politics","score_opus":0.01284545393768329,"score_gpt":0.2701861750362174,"score_spread":0.2573407210985341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808336711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5604133,0.0022397926,0.0043017366,0.028758122,0.0014247065,0.0000554548,0.00006554656,0.00016210233,0.40257928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98377347,0.000298191,0.00018517114,0.00211113,0.00011978704,0.0000101778105,0.000010791737,0.00002163915,0.013469671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524397,0.0025651548,0.00014624254,0.00046256502,0.0006725733,0.0009093808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940767,0.0019654422,0.0012270485,0.0010093569,0.0007279165,0.0009934144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022268922,0.000295723,0.000280692,0.0007011186,0.006820305,0.0052567516,0.0005130899,0.0028784398,0.009143751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010720391,0.00016409953,0.00033809157,0.00043130413,0.006655823,0.0028443742,0.00664981,0.0035620877,0.0012981293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035035625,0.0001906366,0.033673644,0.00034682974,0.0001060575,0.004089538,0.25787905,0.0009130664,0.0067021614,0.4976242,0.07062113,0.12750332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029229579,0.0004027687,0.025102144,0.0007655047,0.000065424305,0.0030672825,0.1722483,0.0013005026,0.006914054,0.04799101,0.7419814,0.00013237404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037136127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052262577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002124303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011865123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030588865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287731110","doi":"10.3138/utlj.102412r","title":"Philosophical Interventions: Reviews 1986–2011","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Craft; Intermediary; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Psychology; History; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06107641061088669,"score_gpt":0.23340376554904171,"score_spread":0.17232735493815501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287731110","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010209016,0.992168,0.00009830891,0.0019897257,0.0014676588,0.000014409045,0.00009566139,0.000011782245,0.0040523973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020471842,0.9894588,0.00033425822,0.003020752,0.0010477215,0.000058165053,0.00015813313,0.00001963824,0.003855367],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997421,0.0007782399,0.0004333305,0.00033284957,0.0008745874,0.00015994745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986016,0.0068166214,0.0018644984,0.0006286093,0.0042564087,0.00041783974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032302497,0.0011742433,0.0011264328,0.010928403,0.00065134955,0.0023371775,0.0009456822,0.0019538242,0.011443811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020618029,0.0008766188,0.00075757015,0.01004853,0.0019413873,0.003010329,0.0020698898,0.0027859493,0.004433851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017330267,0.000054442986,0.00025894993,0.039425522,0.000143609,0.00006359363,0.00051287643,0.00023717202,0.0005188077,0.014152565,0.39747277,0.54698634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108476015,0.000014411664,0.0012374582,0.02247971,0.00005692449,0.00006929398,0.000074528136,0.000012008735,0.00012248955,0.00066677324,0.97524685,0.000008647473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091308085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025226034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011443811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008949531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011813817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06493372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889272343","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0033","title":"The hydraulics of constitutional claims: Multiplicity of actors in constitutional interpretation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional theory; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Constitutional law; Law; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.014521814287404579,"score_gpt":0.2579335399891207,"score_spread":0.24341172570171615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889272343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2130958,0.0062236576,0.17260346,0.122772306,0.00049306836,0.0002470739,0.00010706363,0.0003055719,0.48415205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881136,0.00045502963,0.006929053,0.0010544761,0.0002028351,0.000123339,0.00001907284,0.00007081812,0.0030318694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92661464,0.048362225,0.0025579499,0.0063968757,0.010449999,0.0056183683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9088785,0.07315365,0.0045163566,0.0077322656,0.0028735138,0.0028457951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061979465,0.00059006276,0.001762159,0.006407572,0.02556105,0.03533091,0.0037247492,0.009706509,0.0064963466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072130874,0.0019578582,0.0013167666,0.0041564847,0.16754411,0.053252213,0.027066728,0.012485213,0.00060644496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009590688,0.000006165114,0.0006777934,0.000018412848,0.000007453026,0.00014928458,0.024696978,0.00018970258,0.00008188566,0.9703395,0.00035257364,0.0034706462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030163996,0.000014438199,0.00065018825,0.00012386276,0.00002232256,0.00013195173,0.016327089,0.0010733637,0.00023894741,0.962372,0.018974539,0.000041104915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014572796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116634555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061979465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021301933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01529076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32778263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890544174","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0029","title":"<i>Politeia’s</i> place in our practical life: Pierre Bourdieu on the modern state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; State (computer science); Politics; Epistemology; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04270725949400157,"score_gpt":0.3220995671569359,"score_spread":0.2793923076629343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890544174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040602054,0.055175584,0.00985325,0.22658938,0.00071857846,0.000024074938,0.00003365135,0.00007204633,0.6669314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559833,0.009444271,0.0017536716,0.0057142368,0.00071922946,0.000041177613,0.000010723439,0.000041415413,0.026292058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710196,0.0021966617,0.000022469596,0.0001589453,0.00027838282,0.00024152415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988832,0.0007060104,0.000095020296,0.000070951886,0.0000961322,0.00014870061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021428934,0.000367998,0.00026988206,0.0008942113,0.010475406,0.010322028,0.00058029324,0.0032342703,0.0017877902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023988136,0.00023697237,0.00021536628,0.0011953237,0.044939727,0.0050190585,0.0027513837,0.0051148576,0.00045566322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000448994,0.000004889715,0.000058602793,0.000008792805,6.357312e-7,0.000035973877,0.011371211,0.000118878794,0.000028046099,0.98267853,0.0036645774,0.0020253137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006493591,0.000009640396,0.00028140013,0.0001373829,0.0000022768666,0.00008892188,0.011275571,0.00040656983,0.000099556244,0.6846658,0.30301356,0.000012905972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02404579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016975313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02404579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013671578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059448183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099194705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898181445","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0017","title":"How the prison is a black box in punishment theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Sanctions; Prison; Imprisonment; Criminology; Legitimacy; Sociology of punishment; Field (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminal law","score_opus":0.015486763415355818,"score_gpt":0.25232860908564647,"score_spread":0.23684184567029065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898181445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06117841,0.014514327,0.12384681,0.20175415,0.0014672626,0.00009695133,0.00017301353,0.00013954123,0.5968296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539693,0.003279244,0.010387323,0.006194665,0.0005889959,0.0001475061,0.000047129735,0.0000989804,0.025286913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923183,0.00541466,0.00017071838,0.00064735446,0.00083837385,0.000610645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476177,0.0032885321,0.00039028734,0.0005323742,0.0006254402,0.00040167154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065337936,0.0004656576,0.0008581075,0.0017764491,0.005988931,0.007705755,0.0016163789,0.0044410224,0.0058113965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009581447,0.00051086646,0.0007152396,0.0011447738,0.03441228,0.011404487,0.0038490267,0.0058923145,0.00071807904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023780929,0.0000030919546,0.000055186665,0.000009931104,0.0000013636613,0.000016092754,0.0006563368,0.00012203572,0.000006599466,0.9975915,0.0007251304,0.0008103282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009160824,0.000007594474,0.00014360009,0.00005951981,0.000003454686,0.000029018294,0.00053104025,0.00047485388,0.00002368978,0.9835187,0.015192788,0.000006454185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107529005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010539429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107529005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070457277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006525918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05112058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898316944","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0036","title":"Group RESPs: The intersection of government support for education savings and securities regulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Government (linguistics); Business; Finance; Public economics; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0060629477692027865,"score_gpt":0.19260096867776857,"score_spread":0.18653802090856578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898316944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21442766,0.0047426443,0.003323707,0.16149883,0.00051230885,0.00010165228,0.00029408457,0.00013287019,0.61496633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92601544,0.0018492014,0.0013735441,0.008538316,0.00012566416,0.000017847478,0.00006508574,0.000021451377,0.061993442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613273,0.0005352963,0.000070785005,0.00021996691,0.0013147583,0.001726476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539006,0.0011649012,0.0005585551,0.0002987655,0.0011456675,0.0014420501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023840363,0.00014869393,0.0001558536,0.0009291237,0.009172002,0.006846848,0.0010195631,0.0029623627,0.0068048076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007034075,0.00023353541,0.00027663802,0.0013079197,0.007757023,0.0023783713,0.0031061014,0.0033017413,0.00024821635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035227342,0.000043083182,0.01906752,0.00006462453,0.000011368017,0.0007318915,0.015121206,0.0002965935,0.0003149895,0.871345,0.04401888,0.048949562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017960901,0.000038122387,0.07183589,0.00035089997,0.000029037272,0.00034059354,0.01825483,0.0007123067,0.00085812615,0.040058628,0.86741316,0.00009044018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89665383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.957582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10334617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05794177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097602956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4203989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898506936","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0018","title":"Same-sex marriage beyond Charter dialogue: Charter cases and contestation within government","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Appeal; Law; Cabinet (room); Political science; Charter; Legislature; Caucus; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017619022394133373,"score_gpt":0.246761469031435,"score_spread":0.22914244663730163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898506936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3504045,0.006012675,0.0067383065,0.1084998,0.0007838384,0.00007732228,0.00006258663,0.0000472058,0.52737373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861485,0.00047411423,0.00032764726,0.0045101675,0.00012860842,0.00002850032,0.000010038845,0.000015505111,0.008356842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753998,0.014348144,0.00043883943,0.0019239078,0.0033501366,0.0045391712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815331,0.01401751,0.0010730422,0.0010512056,0.0010602354,0.0012648816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017185766,0.00026510388,0.00053900905,0.0016529812,0.035641607,0.014710142,0.002003586,0.009855935,0.0042821653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027778743,0.00041354547,0.0005679549,0.0022853664,0.053377435,0.010586269,0.009960414,0.011473225,0.00028412623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009548706,0.0000111729405,0.0006638972,0.000010178407,0.000002145321,0.0005484396,0.070728526,0.00008389485,0.00005454682,0.9229105,0.0027469357,0.0022301355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056800745,0.000061518775,0.005259893,0.00045344816,0.000034481505,0.00090938335,0.23397149,0.0013033224,0.0011829817,0.35665745,0.399991,0.00011831837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.130994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13970302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.869006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025272053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014737461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26046312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900682386","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0084","title":"<i>Dunsmuir</i>’s Disconnect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Law; Rule of law; Action (physics); Administrative law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.013911962211216943,"score_gpt":0.24684771979243017,"score_spread":0.23293575758121324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900682386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008124356,0.009335781,0.0022074876,0.77402705,0.0036464802,0.000022784057,0.000106883665,0.00008037929,0.20244874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40026873,0.0057686227,0.004253587,0.5118422,0.0019281685,0.00009411981,0.00008479056,0.00011314937,0.07564667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892603,0.0028752538,0.0004863132,0.0015322757,0.0037073914,0.0021384503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930387,0.0037815745,0.00044593733,0.00043099603,0.0018027425,0.00050003757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006512283,0.00030662667,0.0004586326,0.001538413,0.013109427,0.015834672,0.0028080214,0.011273204,0.0036677662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017412763,0.0004272627,0.00054646784,0.0019306935,0.024036407,0.0044428166,0.0026690948,0.010132717,0.0007420265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009547003,0.0000062255313,0.0003850737,0.000034082226,0.0000038301387,0.000114035,0.003431164,0.0000618218,0.00009941975,0.88064486,0.10885691,0.006353059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011769267,0.000011765059,0.0019743564,0.0002741725,0.000012459283,0.00022130086,0.004531472,0.00022378821,0.00049324986,0.11626698,0.8759104,0.00006825656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6211209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74492323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37887907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041605435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04467784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76222074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900859774","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0085","title":"A house divided: The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent jurisprudence on the standard of review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of review; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Voting; Political science; Statute; Roberts Court; Jurisdiction; Concurring opinion; Deference; Legislature; Economic Justice; Law of the case; Unanimity; Statutory law; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Court of record","score_opus":0.022875086450049906,"score_gpt":0.2539409517552513,"score_spread":0.23106586530520137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900859774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03241665,0.030730722,0.0053152996,0.7442232,0.0075067873,0.0001333702,0.0005542706,0.00013406097,0.17898567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54102325,0.008792759,0.004872246,0.3638457,0.0033342883,0.00009204658,0.00024254862,0.00019570497,0.0776015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95171505,0.0052107493,0.001671753,0.0064494405,0.027522821,0.007430116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945698,0.020525327,0.001421882,0.0019160291,0.024626018,0.005812734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028599115,0.0005052451,0.0009688898,0.0035250494,0.03284977,0.030126352,0.0046296213,0.01899979,0.0035671312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05930044,0.0009899669,0.0012115851,0.0048957393,0.027414868,0.0063712485,0.0037992315,0.021848394,0.00040401114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003616673,0.000018833201,0.0018891917,0.00007105238,0.000034304663,0.000391436,0.0055140057,0.000394829,0.00054715044,0.8457999,0.12839673,0.01690644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059764734,0.000038807073,0.010245366,0.0005618604,0.00008357128,0.00013796339,0.0035647033,0.0009637935,0.0008170858,0.057594266,0.92566067,0.00027212643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97783947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81418234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18581767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25408524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901057308","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0108","title":"The concept of a linguistic community","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Constitution; Nothing; Sociology; Statutory interpretation; Law; Constitutional law; Perspective (graphical); Common law; Political science; Scholarship; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.018152313446316203,"score_gpt":0.26815142520049395,"score_spread":0.24999911175417774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901057308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059795678,0.010067185,0.09506156,0.0540457,0.00093096436,0.0002918566,0.00024165149,0.00021513825,0.7793502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94128555,0.0023574275,0.018663224,0.0044327695,0.00063377875,0.0002817896,0.00012810579,0.000091288384,0.032126013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98831683,0.005831558,0.00038908765,0.001241521,0.0030154735,0.0012054832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926247,0.002791827,0.00097425526,0.0007947856,0.0013315068,0.0014830324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063285353,0.000497755,0.0005357256,0.004984965,0.010753561,0.012157902,0.0023460703,0.0037914016,0.0063014464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009778204,0.0003513103,0.0005867662,0.003111995,0.05157517,0.0143083595,0.011320989,0.0034089617,0.0010077754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003869292,0.0000041257395,0.00019342339,0.000030212794,0.0000024881285,0.000055147324,0.0077229952,0.00008760046,0.0000787204,0.9854909,0.001470918,0.004859724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109192015,0.000024502104,0.00069564383,0.00022128344,0.0000108041295,0.00026132909,0.010250609,0.0008791607,0.00012772677,0.77184975,0.21563765,0.000030642295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025568724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018832853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025568724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010285049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010689022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074623585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901358135","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0053","title":"The Legitimacy of Civil Freedom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Foundation (evidence); Normative; Law; Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.015553866862264058,"score_gpt":0.21065756097522592,"score_spread":0.19510369411296186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901358135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03863712,0.02846066,0.029775053,0.09902471,0.0013541015,0.000037687678,0.0001026798,0.000102307,0.8025056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583273,0.0073693036,0.0024499702,0.0044412147,0.0013072672,0.000057611407,0.00004498576,0.000050591636,0.025951777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573356,0.0018445575,0.000114133516,0.00061392295,0.0011608448,0.0005329266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567837,0.0028882278,0.0002946217,0.0005346048,0.0003923173,0.00021188732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036617473,0.00031027163,0.0004598064,0.0017379697,0.0038102437,0.007866596,0.0007857116,0.0044078194,0.0040763724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008277667,0.0002414682,0.00044628815,0.0009827553,0.041546173,0.008453633,0.0036106708,0.004487554,0.0007061845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010880111,0.0000011505055,0.000022431746,0.000004902243,6.5987746e-7,0.000008173807,0.00031159603,0.000060775055,0.00000883501,0.9976834,0.0007693142,0.0011276235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038322287,0.0000032494002,0.00016399815,0.000068195695,0.0000019992528,0.000025084371,0.0002616665,0.00019852485,0.000047612986,0.95527476,0.043945447,0.000005606359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005264844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003580971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007866596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044690673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0464406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901505419","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0060","title":"How institutions structure judicial behaviour: An analysis of Alarie and Green’s <i>Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts: A Cross-Country Examination of Institutional Constraints on Judges</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Structuring; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01783893595478457,"score_gpt":0.26579021817837395,"score_spread":0.24795128222358936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901505419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93562615,0.0009247225,0.0018419615,0.0062394636,0.00001616801,0.000054007636,0.00013630294,0.00001182667,0.055149343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970227,0.0003759334,0.00045316655,0.0005195722,0.000012754026,0.000032272597,0.00005047371,0.0000083653,0.0015248888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571985,0.0023153792,0.00012439779,0.00035230396,0.00070587336,0.0007821394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677384,0.019181028,0.007744661,0.0015357529,0.0020284567,0.0017717335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005311069,0.00013789663,0.0005734873,0.0017763426,0.0030987496,0.004250004,0.0015652409,0.0014567939,0.0036400573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01751187,0.0002720021,0.0005745049,0.0044220695,0.0074198204,0.0033512707,0.0027572436,0.0027702712,0.00024261605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003404398,0.00062460406,0.24915925,0.000263622,0.00046073893,0.00075703196,0.097151175,0.007149078,0.00087452185,0.6007296,0.012603863,0.029886128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015527241,0.00035862398,0.7290136,0.0005142092,0.0004511098,0.00023490642,0.12722488,0.011113388,0.00077238044,0.10132085,0.02870452,0.00013631381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048140123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07728062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048140123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072641396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032616106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095719814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901670390","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0086","title":"<i>Dunsmuir</i> and the scope of admissible evidence on judicial review: Principled limitations or path dependency?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Charter; Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Relevance (law); Duty; Law and economics; Law; Judicial opinion; Subject (documents); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0840774017677635,"score_gpt":0.3263102886251629,"score_spread":0.2422328868573994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901670390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040060845,0.051733654,0.01905475,0.79276395,0.0033123388,0.00014505361,0.00015127847,0.00014375825,0.12868917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3534855,0.03046549,0.047453366,0.5334095,0.011566208,0.001050361,0.00013118697,0.00019089303,0.022247447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8873676,0.06541604,0.008015068,0.011885063,0.02075148,0.006564782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8047636,0.16562031,0.0069223405,0.009198009,0.011418105,0.002077655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09397583,0.00067334995,0.0020191465,0.0034060422,0.005714882,0.024652382,0.0070944433,0.033990875,0.0032093755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16024165,0.001578017,0.0020899246,0.0028783795,0.06782675,0.022636004,0.0068414384,0.023808764,0.0012226589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012877509,0.000004719788,0.00013650671,0.00006723092,0.0000089680625,0.000037743957,0.00046377012,0.00011132855,0.000041131665,0.9809358,0.013416281,0.0047636684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003459476,0.00002603976,0.0003957407,0.0007769563,0.000024857123,0.00008710742,0.00039496797,0.0004548556,0.00023148285,0.9080107,0.08949564,0.00006700629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029603722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038182136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018135713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025577035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4969976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903694083","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0068","title":"The power to consent: Indigenous peoples, states, and development projects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Veto; Indigenous; Duty; Declaration; Supreme court; Commit; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Medicine; Linguistics; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014181696564772207,"score_gpt":0.2559748801376912,"score_spread":0.241793183572919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903694083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33777198,0.015389743,0.011913819,0.16759624,0.0006908182,0.0002512078,0.000047886566,0.00007129194,0.46626702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835638,0.0023874706,0.0014174173,0.0027482933,0.00007330446,0.00008195128,0.000008994773,0.000012492759,0.009706351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982369,0.0118100755,0.0004738532,0.0006825322,0.0021132468,0.0025513545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98974717,0.0075976877,0.00051986147,0.0005501678,0.0006281598,0.00095700583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018304953,0.00026211335,0.0003548742,0.0011012485,0.0205598,0.011427299,0.0014952096,0.0057448596,0.0026997342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015321635,0.0004037609,0.00034269295,0.0016953391,0.05490823,0.0073955543,0.013097082,0.0061351317,0.00013965073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009145791,0.000016496795,0.0007624601,0.00006529066,0.00000463187,0.00041156515,0.30616766,0.0001461349,0.00010228603,0.67928344,0.0012129663,0.011817815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013663897,0.000061657505,0.0038860172,0.000633122,0.00002549964,0.00048087497,0.36922836,0.00067085505,0.00042719152,0.46537367,0.15912503,0.00007399628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13104779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1499481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13104779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01295814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026556976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904922122","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0057","title":"Institutional bypasses in Brazil’s New Unionism movement: Central unions and workers’ committees","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Representation (politics); State (computer science); Dysfunctional family; Political economy; Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Labour economics; Economics; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.011051428953507667,"score_gpt":0.25062470830465267,"score_spread":0.239573279351145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904922122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79800975,0.0034413773,0.014926121,0.021353992,0.00021197168,0.00017974645,0.000052401112,0.00009882619,0.16172583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541336,0.0002303694,0.000887247,0.00045619495,0.000024696074,0.000040008767,0.0000086724785,0.000010974368,0.0029284246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359304,0.0028695886,0.00024358202,0.00072918774,0.0011593269,0.0014053036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933409,0.0025152562,0.001540795,0.0009199863,0.0006865728,0.0009964628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008258462,0.00025460435,0.00040127325,0.001050554,0.008958837,0.007018023,0.0010022407,0.0021148468,0.0023126164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010673407,0.00044460746,0.00037621733,0.001261133,0.019828865,0.0041027786,0.007534337,0.0036236355,0.00017475517],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003358859,0.00003280472,0.0055268877,0.00008304651,0.000009175711,0.00034787873,0.057559453,0.00038101585,0.0010998534,0.91769254,0.0010578468,0.016175989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018030696,0.0004913288,0.06054058,0.001241005,0.000095351774,0.0012694089,0.10768265,0.0035943643,0.0040088035,0.2736305,0.54706603,0.00019966367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0464376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07420646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0464376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015539891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014678233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11275035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906133617","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0024","title":"Constructing the global constitutional canon: Between authority and criticism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Criticism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.024486889273632746,"score_gpt":0.2788400033718727,"score_spread":0.25435311409823996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906133617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03588924,0.013486849,0.060039055,0.38413215,0.002856228,0.000096133066,0.000074699485,0.000288178,0.50313747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9251858,0.0028358712,0.012026629,0.034980267,0.002399623,0.00021324419,0.00007016439,0.00038663833,0.021901732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714858,0.019529216,0.0007462898,0.0030458644,0.0035779711,0.0016148482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627115,0.026983762,0.0011887212,0.0054645645,0.0024584983,0.001192918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03383431,0.0007354635,0.0010318013,0.0038535215,0.009563898,0.026001822,0.0032842224,0.013389335,0.0051700897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04144343,0.0005301936,0.00076144666,0.002533495,0.09814707,0.02876914,0.012839327,0.013833471,0.00087045575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027918056,0.0000026010582,0.00006329462,0.00000947476,0.0000018909732,0.000024821566,0.0037462187,0.00006252113,0.000017746923,0.99256647,0.0014227045,0.0020794242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007049634,0.0000057756242,0.00009821085,0.00011554609,0.000003764921,0.000024123328,0.004554066,0.00029383047,0.00006532833,0.94720614,0.047616653,0.000009569926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002927162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031406647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03383431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010338071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071177916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17893505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910883856","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0079","title":"Voicing the market: Extending the ambition of contract theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Value (mathematics); Centrality; Morality; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Economics; Government (linguistics); Contract theory; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.008238026037929214,"score_gpt":0.23779649265686761,"score_spread":0.2295584666189384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910883856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023902513,0.03291363,0.14701498,0.21729301,0.0017130205,0.00010233161,0.00011286748,0.00012723175,0.57682055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92672235,0.014863452,0.022410836,0.014263227,0.0027054164,0.00022922379,0.00004885043,0.00014284569,0.01861388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873153,0.007195599,0.00032057386,0.001049945,0.0030940361,0.0010245433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793467,0.015343403,0.00084492646,0.0015347465,0.0017487984,0.0011814329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016239267,0.00061099813,0.0013361031,0.0024909284,0.009052445,0.014789819,0.0025617846,0.010313755,0.004117417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016574204,0.00061818113,0.0010422633,0.0024755122,0.092480324,0.016186113,0.0063275998,0.0106830085,0.00077119033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011053198,0.0000017527647,0.00001571019,0.000006463585,5.743655e-7,0.000009888307,0.00033824143,0.00008770241,0.0000047391804,0.9985154,0.00034922324,0.00066916423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046423006,0.0000039799675,0.00004396795,0.00004979049,0.0000011806665,0.000014315421,0.0002816329,0.00050309947,0.00001419424,0.98296887,0.016109534,0.000004905258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024114203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012461818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024114203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02119065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016986424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15374964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911880519","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0118","title":"Nothing to hide, but something to lose","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014755831856533263,"score_gpt":0.17889282991633443,"score_spread":0.16413699805980117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911880519","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043331683,0.0064669806,0.038598478,0.48644784,0.0026946487,0.00004470166,0.0002589638,0.00013093319,0.4220257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8467233,0.002370154,0.0033868295,0.086211346,0.0014258963,0.000060428836,0.00008980383,0.00012573367,0.059606444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225545,0.0036403744,0.00020743583,0.0011325877,0.0019793166,0.00078477873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913003,0.0046231905,0.0010076528,0.0018663247,0.0007372111,0.00046540215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072856457,0.00039475283,0.00054087676,0.0004984651,0.004774284,0.006363091,0.0009942974,0.0065709194,0.010307093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019413523,0.0003407266,0.0005096496,0.0004823044,0.040142573,0.015900273,0.0053546643,0.008614253,0.0025884458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032376236,0.00001493475,0.0004913258,0.000050599017,0.000020733896,0.00014775268,0.0039445907,0.00009098378,0.00018849364,0.9651281,0.022055129,0.0078349635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019586212,0.000044241293,0.0006353987,0.00024990243,0.000023665034,0.0007677698,0.0036913396,0.00023332975,0.0006396513,0.7320877,0.26156715,0.000040417377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017475211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017171941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010307093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018875756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018819487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03853059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920997510","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0041","title":"Slow or spectacular death: Reconsidering the legal history of blockade and submarines in World War I","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Interdiction; Law; Historiography; Law of war; International law; Spanish Civil War; History; Political science; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029464353710831007,"score_gpt":0.22297734741772735,"score_spread":0.19351299370689634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920997510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27242294,0.031816114,0.0021443225,0.11965659,0.0014517482,0.00003439338,0.00013344464,0.000029249308,0.5723112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977989,0.0054438473,0.00011665121,0.0042319424,0.00040372234,0.000013820482,0.000023337741,0.0000207418,0.011756803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983103,0.0007400876,0.00005748141,0.00017190329,0.00018066479,0.00053955265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961953,0.0024676402,0.00048706005,0.00017186726,0.0003078451,0.00037041193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030502237,0.00028768997,0.0003328187,0.0018088457,0.014099323,0.010895008,0.0015302284,0.005118421,0.0021457328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00879194,0.00039291804,0.00016762254,0.0016378507,0.058039237,0.007249835,0.0052281967,0.007858595,0.00021199064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018731476,0.000007312624,0.0010025688,0.00004269097,0.0000029114526,0.0005018311,0.31420192,0.00008416284,0.000062802545,0.6721782,0.006425264,0.00547157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015503509,0.00007160762,0.00805537,0.0008983596,0.000018140068,0.0006227804,0.3821223,0.00024185558,0.000400324,0.08911493,0.5183845,0.000054293174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17593662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2847542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17593662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019280467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008457875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34982514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921422683","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0078","title":"Reconstituting Canada: The enfranchisement and disenfranchisement of ‘Indians,’ circa 1837–1900","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Treaty; Political science; Law; Democracy; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.003430689752311973,"score_gpt":0.16154386553397526,"score_spread":0.15811317578166328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921422683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17029282,0.02283098,0.0010402018,0.14069225,0.002127855,0.00006667254,0.0009262543,0.00010791041,0.661915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8081219,0.0069566253,0.0006233153,0.018639449,0.00028580008,0.00003636548,0.00024199519,0.00013872278,0.16495584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720854,0.00020437925,0.000026231815,0.00023895905,0.0007570165,0.0015648885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840325,0.00021581532,0.00008859434,0.000054124877,0.000697222,0.0005410467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012404172,0.00046195273,0.00028814923,0.0015399504,0.04418279,0.009050717,0.0012959063,0.0030764386,0.0064078784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038250831,0.0003090397,0.00025054577,0.002856743,0.020854654,0.0026270472,0.003702191,0.005919848,0.0005690329],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008751208,0.00002458686,0.00612484,0.000111941605,0.000017998771,0.0009584096,0.19561702,0.00023387831,0.00059109344,0.60722756,0.15743113,0.031574123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008578749,0.000009966472,0.009040423,0.000106057494,0.000017139468,0.0001741146,0.049242597,0.000092832066,0.00026115842,0.006336366,0.9346529,0.000057874622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1437087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1437087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18137254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922446363","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0063","title":"The problem of the past: How historic wrongs became legal problems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Injustice; Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Complicity; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.0079962469658757,"score_gpt":0.16531471255409533,"score_spread":0.15731846558821963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922446363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12352516,0.0109582255,0.017184213,0.25731283,0.0017603782,0.000067366964,0.000118097596,0.00013764699,0.58893615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96133286,0.0022939881,0.0018560814,0.010059881,0.00036332253,0.000037198508,0.000033318083,0.000093958566,0.023929331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870618,0.0064536943,0.0004356715,0.0014517322,0.0024505975,0.002146437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440444,0.0029510483,0.0006055744,0.0009212823,0.00063224003,0.0004854124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010984135,0.00045449028,0.0006642583,0.0023034895,0.03341549,0.018253021,0.002504235,0.011187179,0.007965144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013150733,0.0005880856,0.0009895095,0.0015232293,0.084063426,0.0279592,0.009686107,0.015505024,0.00097054645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061215987,0.000009163144,0.0005113056,0.00002582062,0.000005061445,0.00051200576,0.047188252,0.00016402938,0.000053672564,0.94125295,0.005919599,0.0043520764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017218805,0.000032152584,0.001034593,0.0006985115,0.000029533641,0.0020890944,0.11280927,0.0006648915,0.0005200177,0.4991502,0.38288987,0.00006469543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038897827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047719758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9611022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018628387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008335876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13515908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936064673","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.003","title":"Assisted dying, suspended declarations, and dialogue’s time","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Political science; Charter; Law; Legislation; Legislature; Praise; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Politics; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.011862443589240169,"score_gpt":0.23123663071061687,"score_spread":0.2193741871213767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936064673","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20539305,0.011587065,0.016756138,0.49688286,0.0032199754,0.00009679536,0.00014562334,0.00020496073,0.26571357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961407,0.00096073997,0.0013043273,0.022439478,0.00031214763,0.0000644764,0.000045588862,0.00009014337,0.01337607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9557476,0.031330165,0.000922608,0.0021455372,0.00416166,0.0056924336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95013285,0.030555893,0.0041051093,0.0024476568,0.0050967154,0.0076617366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036509313,0.0003323155,0.00055849354,0.0013181946,0.039723333,0.017166335,0.0030179839,0.008140337,0.005341171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07236928,0.00062140555,0.0005506534,0.0012740326,0.05503187,0.011513983,0.012124229,0.015324814,0.00077073264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052030766,0.000030205969,0.0020690123,0.00007658837,0.000023343167,0.0009563339,0.43268698,0.00022115487,0.0002769665,0.5118153,0.030915793,0.020876376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034887962,0.000042245767,0.002272705,0.00046291828,0.000019790961,0.00034105292,0.35065874,0.0002958285,0.00033835263,0.13655625,0.508883,0.00009420441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15832706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2617561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15832706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035407376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03569391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31481093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950720224","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0022","title":"Marriage, work, and the invention of family law in English legal thought","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Wife; Domestic relations; Law; Cognitive reframing; Ideology; Situated; Sociology; Relation (database); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012096950998904352,"score_gpt":0.23526338550525075,"score_spread":0.2231664345063464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950720224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36397612,0.052333143,0.014554465,0.06289331,0.0009866051,0.00005036344,0.000058154572,0.00006015024,0.5050876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981005,0.004156316,0.0007697763,0.0011103373,0.00027349382,0.000014739278,0.000009765044,0.000017718383,0.012642855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973622,0.0016918432,0.000089984096,0.0001770962,0.00035702638,0.00032183022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997244,0.0020459634,0.00019821784,0.00011870514,0.00022037808,0.00017271332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037466057,0.00016931999,0.00026445033,0.0018714098,0.008534057,0.0053971107,0.0005777026,0.0016107507,0.0022360554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00481376,0.00021345277,0.00018077402,0.0009840098,0.028143616,0.0057105133,0.0025050582,0.0022939623,0.00022040894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071922523,0.000010427667,0.00039502597,0.000024878635,9.643238e-7,0.00022975175,0.14781061,0.0000441655,0.00006780292,0.8444104,0.0012358486,0.0057628388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026844364,0.000060054277,0.0047251196,0.00051942276,0.000008513269,0.00060023443,0.12986304,0.0007210769,0.00043782158,0.40512702,0.4578735,0.000037367223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01982437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017632466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01982437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008230872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002652049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059719503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952608107","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-05-22","title":"Damages without duty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Duty; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01019217149654458,"score_gpt":0.25134800550708025,"score_spread":0.24115583401053567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952608107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006400375,0.0074385726,0.02185909,0.07602308,0.0026917523,0.000093410155,0.00034534038,0.00009202987,0.8850563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51628387,0.0058540734,0.0106521305,0.075407155,0.0040934407,0.00031129897,0.00029623983,0.00019282487,0.38690898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898606,0.0017885118,0.0006773396,0.0019985493,0.00473025,0.0009447994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588567,0.0017181115,0.0002876158,0.00084699685,0.0010700389,0.00019154829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064672446,0.0007484569,0.0009074775,0.0014389874,0.0043909564,0.006574432,0.0016659889,0.0105655175,0.01586399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015562148,0.000634568,0.0009303178,0.0007476478,0.014261306,0.007735861,0.0043042693,0.009412447,0.0033092268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023079565,0.0000029393195,0.000038890612,0.000011193598,0.0000023785951,0.000016039594,0.00010353853,0.00004600321,0.00003753914,0.99218667,0.005961701,0.0015907226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012215886,0.00003098663,0.00039711432,0.00014496622,0.000011756141,0.0001943373,0.00016626705,0.00027022086,0.0003412501,0.6849844,0.31342122,0.00002526548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012797698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013620137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01586399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058746547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051866733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053070307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954005072","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0023","title":"The patriation of Canadian corporate law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Common law; Political science; English law; Corporate law; Legislation; Comparative law; Sources of law; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Business","score_opus":0.01927071117823441,"score_gpt":0.21882490558066606,"score_spread":0.19955419440243166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954005072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11315629,0.028506173,0.0028464482,0.043800484,0.0007674266,0.00005129928,0.0017075373,0.00013663861,0.80902773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90813804,0.018301077,0.0018892441,0.0038970697,0.0003122446,0.00002082972,0.0005498197,0.000085715255,0.066806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930067,0.00049203,0.00012672266,0.00080519484,0.0042948187,0.0012744834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922506,0.0012475597,0.00059445045,0.00034823976,0.004977676,0.00058137375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001845937,0.00029358297,0.00032196008,0.009698808,0.013512552,0.0111104455,0.00125248,0.0020260564,0.0043058777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010153399,0.00028019014,0.00034774176,0.016642496,0.011022149,0.0024862222,0.0018012098,0.0022119074,0.00036927284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014106711,0.0000051372645,0.007626373,0.00015030564,0.00001736198,0.00038551007,0.020409262,0.0003540361,0.00031287037,0.8693933,0.039485022,0.061846714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020235625,0.0000054728594,0.021725558,0.00027250272,0.00002407252,0.00021786957,0.0052609392,0.00037126627,0.00024271404,0.012784272,0.9590456,0.00004758253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99027073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85094535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14905468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11390184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98697597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954077660","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0115","title":"Corrective justice, coherence, and Kantian right","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Economic Justice; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Indeterminate; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008365572406852782,"score_gpt":0.19333079816482543,"score_spread":0.18496522575797264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954077660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062524505,0.016454048,0.07729468,0.19372037,0.0009345832,0.00005077261,0.00008560466,0.00010326602,0.6488321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970486,0.0016346833,0.006574751,0.0061573307,0.00034344356,0.000032844466,0.000023245857,0.00003196991,0.014715778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916277,0.004130247,0.00031305643,0.00109012,0.0020086835,0.00083031435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352926,0.0035869952,0.0007139145,0.00090022467,0.00085669494,0.00041288853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00876756,0.00029318605,0.00056367915,0.001014876,0.0039989296,0.006095736,0.00094134203,0.0046381527,0.0030525154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012260606,0.00027660534,0.00040121167,0.0010344224,0.04710929,0.008791134,0.0045038965,0.005923405,0.00044348216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003162463,0.0000020149303,0.00003810294,0.00000684483,0.0000015026018,0.000010801414,0.0004945323,0.000060527633,0.000026226104,0.9975268,0.0007449078,0.0010846026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006307884,0.00000373271,0.00013424845,0.000022836986,0.0000019104348,0.000016608272,0.00021336315,0.00010808564,0.0000589139,0.9879566,0.011471638,0.0000056633417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007700539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008675686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00876756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008057249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004207647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0584597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957568653","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0022","title":"Unity in the eye of the beholder? Reasons for decision in theory and practice in the Ontario Works program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Corporate governance; Front line; Public relations; Scale (ratio); Judicial opinion; Political science; Sociology; Law; Management; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.019062088792294,"score_gpt":0.2965428445027758,"score_spread":0.2774807557104818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957568653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55674314,0.0038811555,0.021972846,0.12204835,0.0003271318,0.0001870914,0.00010311964,0.00008209975,0.29465503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942321,0.00032606107,0.0010224866,0.0005101122,0.000011710753,0.000022562092,0.000007560843,0.000015053175,0.0038523453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817923,0.009401424,0.00050833693,0.0013800936,0.0036807728,0.0032372056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97232234,0.018184038,0.0021039937,0.001733131,0.0026693535,0.0029871115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022405641,0.00030520398,0.000493063,0.0021762725,0.029499663,0.018554213,0.0023546908,0.003478229,0.0043904874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03847792,0.00055721926,0.00047063685,0.0023986788,0.09032171,0.009462918,0.007852887,0.0039027932,0.00024830087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021116432,0.00002206202,0.008691568,0.0000803314,0.000008429758,0.00036148098,0.37081337,0.00039275322,0.00013055922,0.60289174,0.0034196244,0.0131668765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025066905,0.000025929343,0.013101941,0.00067839224,0.000025594041,0.00013652335,0.63453496,0.0016106361,0.00032953298,0.19935945,0.15009233,0.000079634345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82615536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8931189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82615536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11883274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11539002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8621959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961168636","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0057","title":"A new legal science with an old aftertaste","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Scholarship; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Criminal justice; Argumentative; Normative; Criticism; Criminal law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.010563075363505973,"score_gpt":0.248315783896043,"score_spread":0.23775270853253702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961168636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004488194,0.076870136,0.032638974,0.6847179,0.021080134,0.000036282534,0.00014348543,0.00027544066,0.17974952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40371585,0.0978399,0.04325024,0.19138868,0.08392234,0.00038123256,0.0003156586,0.0009087682,0.17827739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924077,0.0032738303,0.00023489712,0.0007992152,0.002922156,0.00036213553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857841,0.008409319,0.00059269735,0.0023789813,0.0017271471,0.0011077565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009212107,0.00097345794,0.0014943883,0.003914277,0.008454017,0.018122056,0.0022203592,0.0094253,0.007670316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01381015,0.00056629785,0.00075808354,0.0023124008,0.0898098,0.033257518,0.009363345,0.01806401,0.0023207588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007434536,0.000010722674,0.00007392777,0.00005124056,0.000004485402,0.000029068662,0.0010243754,0.00004446091,0.00006576144,0.97369474,0.01798812,0.007005796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009582098,0.000023581773,0.00013604322,0.00025268493,0.000004714115,0.000108792454,0.0017118566,0.00030663327,0.00009561208,0.73915654,0.25817937,0.000014493905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033273294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050609442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018122056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007528025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077770986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964660712","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-05-27","title":"Institutions protecting constitutional democracy: Some conceptual and methodological preliminaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Legislature; Statutory law; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Government (linguistics); Executive branch; Constitutional law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07140572652467007,"score_gpt":0.3218985388752062,"score_spread":0.2504928123505361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964660712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0305853,0.07849406,0.30535424,0.17981939,0.0028309706,0.0011598701,0.002321461,0.00019523925,0.39923945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61717045,0.079292074,0.22137669,0.025710491,0.007216151,0.0074206297,0.0016437357,0.00023108712,0.03993875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952709,0.002931491,0.00036542816,0.00045141618,0.0005807525,0.00039994478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116486,0.0065534734,0.0010299236,0.00050274713,0.0005230022,0.00022594641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008027825,0.0011557307,0.0010117794,0.0075846603,0.005617833,0.009876297,0.0032628991,0.0065603172,0.008881478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008296509,0.0010715128,0.001317109,0.009731972,0.02869102,0.010312854,0.006040071,0.011220533,0.0018963955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.55777e-7,0.000007967927,0.000054963537,0.000026262893,9.140523e-7,0.000021750788,0.0004651435,0.0000829151,0.000021432777,0.99840516,0.00040441396,0.00050820096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000918724,0.000022091186,0.00036935526,0.00034003195,0.0000060531925,0.00013007133,0.0016760073,0.0007339145,0.00017236239,0.8868684,0.109653264,0.000019184336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006147061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004857141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009876297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007933722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004824133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057563424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971621849","doi":"","title":"Sexual History Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: A Critical Reevaluation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Sexual history; Criminology; Sexual revolution; Psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Political science; Medicine; Human sexuality; Medical emergency; Law","score_opus":0.13270185352480676,"score_gpt":0.34066949974569305,"score_spread":0.2079676462208863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971621849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07555395,0.25834745,0.0036698608,0.6112867,0.003940531,0.00032388789,0.00049686537,0.000042245458,0.04633847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8374668,0.095025055,0.004580845,0.055328388,0.0047835056,0.0002448273,0.00023027358,0.000058504524,0.0022819163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97683585,0.011664498,0.0036888449,0.0010789476,0.005301071,0.0014308327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54787064,0.4038563,0.012646334,0.0061457795,0.026336888,0.0031440533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066228844,0.0005104107,0.0013766866,0.02243529,0.00779754,0.014774589,0.006446239,0.011989172,0.0025827214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24819668,0.0015256666,0.0008311642,0.008039201,0.036838084,0.017129617,0.007857557,0.012852913,0.00025681243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031362835,0.00015749378,0.053578265,0.013920129,0.00044057015,0.009840935,0.15469772,0.00042731178,0.0010741394,0.45018888,0.065922305,0.24943867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011077561,0.00023656596,0.06528814,0.059066754,0.000924259,0.010575962,0.22758843,0.00075019145,0.0013021792,0.1404789,0.4934276,0.00025025825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048324052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16274673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066228844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016893415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02136312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3502558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982313139","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0051","title":"‘Repugnant’: Homosexuality and Criminal Family Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Homosexuality; Criminal law; State (computer science); Law; State of exception; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04238659385392869,"score_gpt":0.2583657877288654,"score_spread":0.21597919387493675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982313139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28854287,0.03515805,0.0019370625,0.21782145,0.0006237176,0.00002521856,0.00008404198,0.000027741291,0.45577994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97922224,0.0029494155,0.00013697782,0.006226594,0.00009264822,0.0000045846896,0.000009364368,0.0000058101227,0.011352304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998252,0.00074542867,0.000030462646,0.00012172027,0.00033438538,0.00051600515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883705,0.0005459232,0.00012219159,0.000075070995,0.00017283652,0.00024690587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019889541,0.0001272574,0.00017767583,0.00067247427,0.011154264,0.0058497083,0.00078982575,0.0022835406,0.0027124495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030323956,0.00014882613,0.00012883735,0.00086405023,0.045609,0.0024321736,0.0020586015,0.0032486212,0.00014638103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006062881,0.000010092104,0.0016572996,0.000015979123,0.0000018729198,0.00014870855,0.044182923,0.00006349608,0.000073075666,0.9426531,0.005138062,0.0060493355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026413798,0.000047587797,0.037240524,0.00056605524,0.000023750292,0.00057083333,0.16333707,0.00054975256,0.00067949016,0.23501247,0.56187606,0.00007006504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7919984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8311656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20800161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030717233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026081657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4184531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991662242","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.007","title":"Remedies for violations of Indigenous peoples’ human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Indigenous rights; Reservation of rights; Law; Indigenous; Fundamental rights; Jurisprudence; Right to property; International law; Rights of Nature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013313868627646528,"score_gpt":0.2696257006686968,"score_spread":0.25631183204105024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991662242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048896752,0.018265406,0.018534377,0.091406785,0.0028669965,0.0009298965,0.00037380078,0.0008972258,0.81782883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69946945,0.016944671,0.03006217,0.04809556,0.0007566175,0.0003996877,0.00038903585,0.00022288419,0.20365983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728095,0.0022291685,0.0015531038,0.0015924945,0.015395925,0.006419761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98816633,0.0030735522,0.0008468741,0.0012388229,0.005695706,0.0009788296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009168886,0.00080318766,0.00063283526,0.003794369,0.016377112,0.007317207,0.0043927245,0.0089921905,0.0076253987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021724125,0.0007008013,0.0012014351,0.0018156783,0.019096278,0.0023057098,0.006324764,0.011408907,0.0008329727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001634557,0.000090630536,0.003155254,0.0004705581,0.00005540709,0.0015198436,0.029282875,0.0009735101,0.0033188302,0.8185267,0.06578484,0.07680511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003906426,0.00008842493,0.01298786,0.0017243251,0.00017223078,0.00090704294,0.017332535,0.0008201107,0.0036816346,0.053428717,0.90853304,0.0002849072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8861044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92851174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113895595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041418936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12564202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30051684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991746385","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.002","title":"The disappointing remedy? Damages as a remedy for violations of human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Political science; Punitive damages; Tort; Law; Human rights; Common law; Proportionality (law); Disappointment; Discretion; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.018075868416494403,"score_gpt":0.29953905966886396,"score_spread":0.28146319125236957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991746385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02650536,0.03093253,0.038566932,0.64699787,0.005387421,0.0001186059,0.00010783497,0.00021992375,0.25116366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8554283,0.008463019,0.00957338,0.0654461,0.003415145,0.00010930496,0.000029754772,0.00010053792,0.057434455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751868,0.008910111,0.0011376025,0.003468157,0.009011153,0.0022861008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98603606,0.0070952284,0.0015036564,0.0027252522,0.0017169642,0.0009228285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014509762,0.0005164992,0.00086072145,0.0017431272,0.005625475,0.012810505,0.0022837897,0.017438717,0.0066849054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038767386,0.0005198781,0.0009913306,0.0007893739,0.029195588,0.015540504,0.006333695,0.014745764,0.00092363503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013961985,0.00001534723,0.00029960246,0.000045640827,0.000014292047,0.000074652875,0.00042354342,0.00038590998,0.00022304093,0.97997046,0.008340354,0.010193228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006434812,0.00017929744,0.0016905464,0.0005610314,0.000054313718,0.00050096906,0.0015998554,0.0010866589,0.0011373039,0.7242601,0.26876053,0.0001049973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007837298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01147554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076195984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01063617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076735914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991900837","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.006","title":"The right-remedy gap in economic and social rights adjudication: Holism versus separability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dignity; Holism; Social rights; Fundamental rights; Right to health; Political science; Law and economics; Empowerment; Human rights; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014228895770455503,"score_gpt":0.26792245688190774,"score_spread":0.25369356111145225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991900837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1018535,0.012089296,0.23577307,0.2752499,0.0014742835,0.00030075223,0.00020116493,0.00013359704,0.37292442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96909404,0.0011606419,0.016186228,0.007443727,0.0006460265,0.0002336689,0.000030087049,0.0000528911,0.005152639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.958099,0.024868738,0.0022335378,0.0038015035,0.0075760097,0.0034211068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96036935,0.029695392,0.0024612804,0.004167719,0.0022780388,0.0010282384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044020496,0.00049484,0.0012995327,0.0027665866,0.00973285,0.014414749,0.002304291,0.008432799,0.002625973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04439209,0.0006418227,0.0011992925,0.0019202087,0.110681854,0.02331053,0.010722525,0.015830837,0.00028785132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033017147,0.0000028527995,0.00005176087,0.000008918321,0.0000018572395,0.000014398142,0.0010252974,0.00005393794,0.000026731079,0.99794453,0.0001742211,0.00069215166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020508034,0.000012607696,0.00020364893,0.00012261268,0.0000075253693,0.000038306596,0.0014540321,0.0004206589,0.00015380028,0.9875668,0.009983173,0.000016451313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009530125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007471035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044020496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012889591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016038243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23280537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992685277","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.004","title":"Remedial discretion and dilemmas in Asia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Remedial education; Legislation; Reinterpretation; Political science; Law; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Discretion; Constitutionality; Government (linguistics); Judicial restraint; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.00941150560976816,"score_gpt":0.22191570462976817,"score_spread":0.21250419902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992685277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27096304,0.004294139,0.008457382,0.044567242,0.00023662245,0.000079867736,0.000084299805,0.00006175503,0.67125565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833941,0.0006053261,0.0010077283,0.0034415696,0.0000693852,0.000032772306,0.000011248831,0.000020884258,0.011417016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99353504,0.0022823936,0.00052673,0.00089196867,0.0012029267,0.0015609441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923199,0.00335495,0.0011059679,0.001261009,0.0011554129,0.0008028677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01259757,0.0002744335,0.0006084174,0.0012540808,0.007547784,0.008024794,0.0016461124,0.003807707,0.0077007534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013864607,0.0003514917,0.0005083982,0.0013603482,0.023280026,0.006545302,0.007057236,0.006589566,0.0005357088],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028938199,0.000032469477,0.0018324073,0.00004354421,0.000014122167,0.00076205435,0.010706936,0.0006839319,0.0002810818,0.9744855,0.0018077203,0.009321236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099266304,0.00008502981,0.005365326,0.0005319944,0.000046728037,0.0009507266,0.023429753,0.002566957,0.0011894995,0.81631356,0.14932533,0.00009575935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023637109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02574753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023637109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00899787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010373604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06662315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993070474","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.001","title":"Interim remedies and constitutional rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Law; Political science; Charter; Plaintiff; Common law; Limiting; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.014208744565499847,"score_gpt":0.23841466989568655,"score_spread":0.2242059253301867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993070474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022152668,0.0041104094,0.044133287,0.02888918,0.00083826674,0.00025329343,0.00022392004,0.00018016706,0.8992189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.855935,0.0026045318,0.01785314,0.010791834,0.0010566144,0.0003984441,0.00017788332,0.00012955721,0.111053035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97807944,0.0059334794,0.001413507,0.0038222186,0.00633306,0.0044183093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98591805,0.0057466826,0.0012220134,0.0038716248,0.002295584,0.00094605744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018022312,0.00063857983,0.0009714317,0.0019773196,0.007466613,0.011251513,0.002874945,0.011462203,0.016858842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030874869,0.0006956364,0.0012020785,0.0011619566,0.046745744,0.011892817,0.007894146,0.012951025,0.001654591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004597772,0.000005959341,0.000056516874,0.000010330703,0.000002161659,0.000030926545,0.00031410978,0.000089182984,0.00007752388,0.99635917,0.00069460814,0.0023549385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004437256,0.00007365523,0.0007119102,0.00027098868,0.000030981646,0.00015830467,0.00069558364,0.0003556102,0.0005947214,0.8544753,0.14253618,0.00005241955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016588401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020535734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018022312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009021115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017187411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09531224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993557111","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.005","title":"Choosing between simple and complex remedies in socio-economic rights cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Work (physics); Dialogical self; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029304648008640122,"score_gpt":0.2639876908291506,"score_spread":0.23468304282051045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993557111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46079126,0.008151561,0.11551578,0.08178968,0.0006251377,0.0020002956,0.00010975108,0.00027059508,0.33074597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98020935,0.0005762559,0.014465279,0.0028041606,0.00008532927,0.00022000591,0.0000096919175,0.000023287337,0.0016066708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93516177,0.030062005,0.005339052,0.004800372,0.017296882,0.0073399083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8818769,0.09666296,0.009943544,0.0039394824,0.004469172,0.0031079429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05927853,0.0007101189,0.0013499645,0.0072431387,0.014151921,0.01991407,0.003472497,0.012445082,0.0034885695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11461885,0.001056151,0.0014258642,0.0031269868,0.04222229,0.02022516,0.014936003,0.009292687,0.0003926335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006098215,0.00011975544,0.003656585,0.00016090149,0.000050783336,0.0005654439,0.0047984137,0.002711821,0.00065297104,0.9685126,0.0013130236,0.017396785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471681,0.00015712102,0.0074561904,0.0006026132,0.00009984676,0.00034156564,0.0061428538,0.00666626,0.001708229,0.96170175,0.014690849,0.00018543878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054029603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015570851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05927853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013266294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012591059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31349862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994375318","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.intro","title":"Introduction: A symposium examining remedies for violations of human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0192179483760636,"score_gpt":0.252920296803765,"score_spread":0.23370234842770138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994375318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008702123,0.15230896,0.0007740079,0.6571039,0.13902913,0.00010517556,0.00048425025,0.000064759835,0.049259648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027874783,0.15835872,0.0020100581,0.39696944,0.1589325,0.00020999646,0.0005854905,0.00021880664,0.2548402],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686533,0.0007905038,0.00024080108,0.00040947937,0.0011872794,0.0005066333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226224,0.0032655725,0.00031865656,0.00038215274,0.0026105663,0.0011607037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051850597,0.0013153665,0.0008320815,0.0027033414,0.0071687866,0.009973277,0.0025948985,0.022919597,0.023776429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009347669,0.0008146538,0.0013054991,0.0022989844,0.0057996805,0.0072940206,0.003972313,0.016066372,0.004336206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017206577,0.000023749151,0.00012153033,0.00028222657,0.000008370946,0.000061217426,0.0005829601,0.00005501417,0.00013485628,0.013705177,0.9691767,0.015830874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011216344,0.000019718478,0.0008360238,0.0007993311,0.000020822596,0.00005449236,0.000895505,0.000026914568,0.00007778183,0.0039555137,0.9932827,0.000020000654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15846719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3951579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015928322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019029934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31508958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005639023","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0076","title":"Criminal justice and the liberal good of ‘order’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Flourishing; Social order; Criminal justice; Order (exchange); Politics; Precondition; Law and economics; Theory of criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Value pluralism; Liberalism; Political philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.023516492643505815,"score_gpt":0.20669629069767598,"score_spread":0.18317979805417017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005639023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043708812,0.003826711,0.0172133,0.10201868,0.00060483854,0.00002896231,0.000041830725,0.00006296164,0.8324939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97083765,0.0008037277,0.0026048997,0.0070827194,0.0003508816,0.0000406321,0.000020268202,0.00003681118,0.018222328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920609,0.0041204505,0.0002232524,0.00085520773,0.0014403946,0.0012996808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941603,0.0023252205,0.00075941015,0.0011154807,0.0007406383,0.0008990293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056424863,0.00031393563,0.00039186783,0.0011123493,0.011328292,0.011829335,0.0008127584,0.0043128976,0.0032489363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008263649,0.00029927175,0.00038614956,0.001035997,0.078815036,0.006586239,0.006557483,0.006653837,0.00052660226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017455893,0.0000021005665,0.0000597991,0.000003604645,8.6802373e-7,0.000009190626,0.00090013875,0.00003539379,0.000013181484,0.9974016,0.0008423114,0.00073007325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063286648,0.00000443167,0.00022049507,0.000023098573,0.0000017368959,0.00002423893,0.00055813004,0.00010011245,0.00004344535,0.96404105,0.0349712,0.000005595103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012310783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019151855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012310783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007913092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009011669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057413816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005822310","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0064","title":"Civil order, criminal justice, and ‘no justice no peace’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Civil society; Duty; Sanctions; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.02086001863279383,"score_gpt":0.2575681927886288,"score_spread":0.23670817415583498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005822310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058046386,0.016927185,0.018254232,0.17499918,0.0043387986,0.000092897775,0.00015333411,0.0001599709,0.72702795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386711,0.0031235963,0.0034905586,0.025726086,0.0017995826,0.00015119526,0.00009335074,0.00013438969,0.026810111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901912,0.0048707915,0.00038906102,0.0010414554,0.0019310891,0.0015763782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432313,0.0031403822,0.0009186084,0.0006978061,0.00038622497,0.00053383695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034405687,0.0006978555,0.0004558472,0.0018120903,0.013047309,0.011453174,0.001217789,0.0100222435,0.0055332882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006743252,0.00036690178,0.00049906626,0.0019062845,0.09146789,0.01365541,0.011199381,0.012873149,0.000561165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052204327,0.000006875637,0.0001482156,0.000022291837,0.0000015098874,0.00005254075,0.008457707,0.00003772351,0.000026302625,0.9849974,0.0036601885,0.0025841247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014699227,0.000031487358,0.0017288099,0.00025789844,0.0000045094375,0.0005052942,0.019549595,0.0002582792,0.00022459758,0.61675143,0.3606316,0.000041753294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009893849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016656479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013047309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073040053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041785478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05299449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005824885","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0063","title":"Civil order, markets, and the intelligibility of the criminal law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Criminal law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil society; Modernity; Social order; Sociology; Political science; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.019536961946682915,"score_gpt":0.24530791825934686,"score_spread":0.22577095631266395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005824885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0755033,0.024785835,0.03373265,0.083060876,0.0005225269,0.00005520813,0.00009681763,0.00007307628,0.78216976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97822684,0.004855718,0.0028931983,0.0017287561,0.0002890983,0.000034799403,0.000023383367,0.000025700321,0.01192243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956487,0.0023853977,0.00016359176,0.00035038774,0.0010405027,0.00041140808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941934,0.004107429,0.00056761445,0.00041524787,0.0003793259,0.0003369407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004668219,0.0005270997,0.0005711771,0.00243021,0.0057714977,0.011148545,0.0009324192,0.0037339174,0.003737073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007250772,0.0003577854,0.00032940664,0.0019290476,0.09178016,0.0113120945,0.0054600383,0.0045797992,0.00027385794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.497468e-7,0.0000016308526,0.00003523416,0.0000069788957,4.773833e-7,0.000015614516,0.0010328487,0.0000842342,0.000009052489,0.9979259,0.00020153231,0.00068547524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036288357,0.0000038024718,0.00021856616,0.000057737412,0.0000012103948,0.00003325711,0.0017794834,0.00028840033,0.000042557716,0.9768092,0.020756533,0.0000055156634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026265599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022330772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026265599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01427745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009557327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10359067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005924819","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0061","title":"The constitution of criminal law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Law; Constitution; Political science; Flourishing; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.022617027915012446,"score_gpt":0.25593738061297144,"score_spread":0.233320352697959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005924819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010508979,0.011757052,0.01682137,0.055087224,0.0010981438,0.0001212867,0.00020417388,0.00008332105,0.90431833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8753182,0.009662575,0.010148461,0.014871164,0.0021737334,0.00043135602,0.00025610457,0.00010194522,0.08703637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507034,0.0015930828,0.00021754486,0.0008659161,0.0013691816,0.00088404125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690324,0.0015442788,0.00031189324,0.00042550656,0.00049544027,0.00031962869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003985089,0.0004236313,0.0005203778,0.0027596136,0.009213077,0.012150558,0.0010727553,0.0051520853,0.0067230724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073358472,0.00051097194,0.00042040244,0.0017427001,0.04156636,0.0057874443,0.004738694,0.0065228296,0.0010715328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.647982e-7,0.0000015215195,0.00004218879,0.0000040548325,6.599162e-7,0.0000102371805,0.00039876462,0.00004105755,0.000009799598,0.99758697,0.0012043313,0.00069983903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007332643,0.000008508222,0.00041174103,0.00018351199,0.000004457723,0.000059022335,0.0006003204,0.0002969711,0.00006396966,0.7717908,0.22656041,0.000012949729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02539045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017839387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02539045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011665918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111800395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08464259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006054766","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0118","title":"Criminal punishment and the right to rule","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Criminal justice; State (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Law; Political science; Theory of criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.017173148332485264,"score_gpt":0.20027301433369363,"score_spread":0.18309986600120837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006054766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033273593,0.0043091998,0.007041727,0.044293333,0.00030280848,0.000021005466,0.000052333166,0.00002948621,0.9106766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499234,0.001656089,0.0015082421,0.004778063,0.00023408403,0.000034101064,0.000029165849,0.000018092827,0.041818716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955081,0.0015415413,0.00016068574,0.0006743123,0.0010909507,0.0010244523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773395,0.00072481326,0.00038787336,0.00034839843,0.00041407402,0.00039092204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028271433,0.00022773129,0.0003928628,0.0007095372,0.0049558943,0.005295102,0.00075335824,0.0042309305,0.005083721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005064607,0.0002126212,0.00030562736,0.00045750407,0.029089315,0.0028578192,0.0031538652,0.004442665,0.00071553275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019842832,0.00000391247,0.000114570554,0.000004473545,0.0000010319076,0.000023269293,0.00044382093,0.000065292035,0.000021216596,0.99698347,0.0011266834,0.0012102326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017540442,0.000012872133,0.0013187691,0.000075774165,0.0000053164995,0.00011545347,0.00050081825,0.00029530027,0.00009414783,0.9323433,0.06520544,0.0000152017465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038677018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045364514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038677018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006314179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074282917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07690376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006544480","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0075","title":"A democratic theory of punishment: The Trop principle","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Law; Democracy; Citizenship; Political science; State (computer science); Supreme court; Prison; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020872847237066516,"score_gpt":0.2526635567651236,"score_spread":0.23179070952805708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006544480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019196488,0.0025074885,0.27205077,0.046576574,0.000821879,0.00017639584,0.00016779543,0.00016975877,0.6583328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227556,0.001433596,0.023470279,0.010622917,0.0009382205,0.00043662352,0.000063335305,0.00011873241,0.040160764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896808,0.005334891,0.00033616665,0.0011885702,0.002093094,0.001366462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948383,0.0024334192,0.0006949585,0.0008715036,0.00081865664,0.00034311114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007122686,0.0006668872,0.000778228,0.0011460634,0.0055030026,0.0049258727,0.0013960054,0.00419851,0.00664987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010892424,0.00038149898,0.0012499469,0.00077973376,0.022852834,0.00607341,0.0046611256,0.008080874,0.0013007207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029658138,0.0000034953293,0.00006374422,0.000011528292,0.0000036109152,0.000020517933,0.0002556016,0.00034749124,0.000023333385,0.9971566,0.0009789161,0.001132267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015383692,0.000014847526,0.0001276227,0.00003775421,0.0000051440825,0.000060935487,0.000116980795,0.00083298195,0.000058361493,0.97869295,0.02002847,0.000008698627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029640347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040160893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007122686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004290941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005833644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037668765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006647981","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0066","title":"Criminal law as public ordering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Order (exchange); Law; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Verb; Noun; Philosophy of law; Leverage (statistics); Phrase; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05364129303452982,"score_gpt":0.2770848625728848,"score_spread":0.22344356953835495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006647981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025496101,0.0018246089,0.009274307,0.027930524,0.00029598043,0.000050527164,0.0001227819,0.00009620374,0.93490887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657173,0.0011333534,0.002114312,0.0030475124,0.00032502442,0.000054388714,0.0000910956,0.000055950295,0.027461061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99242544,0.0024972623,0.0003437215,0.00092627085,0.0023926164,0.0014147596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904681,0.0040946873,0.0012704021,0.0023000436,0.0012835668,0.00058323913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046925736,0.00034627027,0.00043707291,0.0022430026,0.007836497,0.014893841,0.0013565982,0.0052020093,0.009464491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012945729,0.00047751254,0.0004171187,0.0028997862,0.05776023,0.011581892,0.0057179937,0.004958216,0.0008425114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014325469,0.0000035449586,0.00016546734,0.0000067458705,6.066775e-7,0.000034882043,0.001271559,0.000044960398,0.000012262416,0.9959228,0.0010449719,0.0014907814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010408318,0.000013583255,0.0011944206,0.00013614804,0.000010604478,0.00020843057,0.0033394818,0.00038265006,0.00020852621,0.85812,0.13636157,0.000014011762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048987936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057184473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048987936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01801858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015562031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13073456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010769090","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0142","title":"Criminalization, legal moralism, and abolition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Government (linguistics); Argumentative; Law; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Realm; Sociology; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02444520781592778,"score_gpt":0.2549425004430945,"score_spread":0.23049729262716673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010769090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028866505,0.10231454,0.0074158898,0.15105647,0.0023850016,0.00003818061,0.000048157042,0.00005828581,0.7078169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89568305,0.028367834,0.0016917454,0.014220058,0.0014508264,0.00008236188,0.00004584466,0.000040012746,0.058418255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601376,0.0019378889,0.0001069478,0.00034097314,0.0009193935,0.0006810225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799865,0.0010052788,0.00036279915,0.00018060271,0.00027151057,0.00018116836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026859767,0.00026776068,0.00041741267,0.0009394542,0.0037606554,0.005949205,0.0010356333,0.0030708236,0.0020095876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00490558,0.00023039618,0.00028638463,0.0013301502,0.060287047,0.0045113345,0.0029171435,0.0055718143,0.00033889106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016677033,0.000002667596,0.000060320257,0.000022107251,8.4899614e-7,0.000023325318,0.0009607134,0.0000433402,0.000010256677,0.99321645,0.0032820618,0.0023762085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007963474,0.000013095209,0.0012497302,0.00028945718,0.0000041323888,0.00015002319,0.002536279,0.00023860892,0.0000876163,0.8002398,0.19517197,0.000011322601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022376727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0192889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022376727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010076759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075552207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07311237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011337745","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0102","title":"Criminal law in an age of mass incarceration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Mass incarceration; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.029609939556643015,"score_gpt":0.27268729641120965,"score_spread":0.24307735685456663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011337745","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08617416,0.028171446,0.0017181354,0.48624483,0.0032544462,0.000027779231,0.00006839972,0.00008269408,0.39425805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8281976,0.010821518,0.0005850213,0.054863933,0.0025110394,0.000035137782,0.00003107936,0.00007807339,0.10287669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978011,0.00063898705,0.000043380063,0.00022084,0.00046118975,0.00083440304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970515,0.00091661466,0.000356614,0.00019760244,0.00045595536,0.0010218055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022513813,0.00030440892,0.00035906833,0.0009905867,0.017236216,0.008844985,0.00088906754,0.006816726,0.0040776944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071234046,0.0003554117,0.00024291557,0.0011075273,0.026249044,0.007941074,0.0054931752,0.012102541,0.00059900526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019797553,0.000016827606,0.0011122354,0.000033282966,0.0000047450726,0.00094363454,0.08639168,0.000090447895,0.00009893794,0.81021875,0.08886056,0.012209134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007724454,0.00003723187,0.0039123385,0.00028121233,0.000008958746,0.0009972886,0.058905836,0.00016935056,0.00014890957,0.1434035,0.7920984,0.000029233135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09075075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17722806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09075075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012288464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009178621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18044508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012515956","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0115","title":"In Search of Honourable Crowns and Legitimate Constitutions: <i>Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada</i> and the Colonial Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Indigenous; Duty; Doctrine; Political science; Legislation; Colonialism; Sociology","score_opus":0.0248928437648911,"score_gpt":0.23658758774391284,"score_spread":0.21169474397902174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012515956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16188653,0.014725299,0.0042903475,0.104942344,0.0007480886,0.0001926812,0.00019249477,0.000049864222,0.7129723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91821486,0.0024267214,0.0017862526,0.014242034,0.00012392772,0.00005424265,0.000049306513,0.00002815591,0.06307451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995262,0.0006994482,0.000087334905,0.00046273446,0.001455343,0.002033166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977774,0.00085654744,0.00018188202,0.00009201005,0.0007154091,0.00037674615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030664282,0.00034225543,0.00031969667,0.0012715952,0.020327639,0.015662575,0.002045031,0.007739854,0.003295804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067997277,0.0004275587,0.00034064378,0.0012168091,0.029052202,0.003151896,0.0034456637,0.00917139,0.00025727195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009421293,0.0000053706203,0.00051921804,0.000025064814,0.0000057346765,0.00032839997,0.0130645055,0.0001529175,0.00023589874,0.97614235,0.006710965,0.002800165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000684504,0.00003212103,0.010521233,0.00058581575,0.000079249745,0.00035006666,0.055201527,0.0012902432,0.0019300501,0.23537998,0.69433993,0.00022138518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9660207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07823352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07823352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0893198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5676266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014232915","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0043","title":"Treaty Failure or Treaty Constitutionalism? The Problematic Validity of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Jurisprudence; Federalism; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Presumption; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Reinterpretation; Political science; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.02510141922362404,"score_gpt":0.22622060910536207,"score_spread":0.20111918988173802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014232915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054356825,0.010637938,0.0038445077,0.3751086,0.0020058006,0.00008437522,0.0005311321,0.00008442899,0.55334634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89137954,0.0037565017,0.0017476435,0.036150537,0.0009483604,0.000092411465,0.00018381001,0.0000928243,0.065648295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98236257,0.0053166896,0.00041900715,0.0019085036,0.0054106815,0.0045825453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905963,0.0037204826,0.00054619554,0.0008058641,0.0036230457,0.0007080939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014528396,0.00041629266,0.00092703156,0.0015341436,0.020749087,0.0144915,0.005499042,0.0075567407,0.009788386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024409164,0.00041615756,0.00077252014,0.0023408674,0.03640089,0.00731011,0.0030460476,0.01161566,0.00077454955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010949525,0.000007272251,0.00049270893,0.000027743134,0.000007673941,0.00009357898,0.003009198,0.00015753301,0.000058973612,0.9789652,0.013100431,0.0040687374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012380518,0.00005099702,0.012203178,0.001244593,0.000097928234,0.00015581459,0.019270843,0.0020521826,0.0007163067,0.4237873,0.5400299,0.00026725524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96470946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11175648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11175648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11048521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81085384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014514066","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0103","title":"The artificial morality of private law: The persistence of an illusion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Moral rights; Political science; Property rights; Normative; Legal realism; Morality; Sociology; Legal profession; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.051750940863436866,"score_gpt":0.22016833041651132,"score_spread":0.16841738955307445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014514066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04934434,0.008144149,0.08322344,0.55352783,0.0016968221,0.000049869996,0.00016519548,0.00023604505,0.30361235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471368,0.0020207285,0.012212644,0.023726594,0.0019438812,0.00013090046,0.000057150788,0.0002998934,0.012471344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97771716,0.012967738,0.0005372743,0.0025655965,0.0049553863,0.0012568265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634976,0.023559911,0.0019663211,0.006502848,0.0028189803,0.0016543546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019689627,0.00045246576,0.00094575377,0.0021301077,0.0100516,0.017956419,0.002479843,0.009451746,0.0050719143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036468983,0.0008186685,0.0009683375,0.0013877361,0.1242285,0.028068095,0.009731365,0.019388976,0.0009194591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004392732,0.0000052155233,0.000056302462,0.000011115589,0.0000021319918,0.000013784925,0.0014640213,0.000072928444,0.000031873693,0.9958133,0.0011480505,0.0013768319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008042476,0.000003861156,0.000051679337,0.000029485956,0.0000013746607,0.000023010292,0.00047677686,0.00033206822,0.0000319047,0.98436916,0.014665936,0.000006658849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004551851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026175852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019689627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009616766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069135022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10412997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014659821","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0095","title":"The implications of property as self-government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Land tenure; Alienation; Land law; Property rights; Corporate governance; Scholarship; Property (philosophy); Political science; Government (linguistics); Common ownership; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.017524330141002003,"score_gpt":0.24212745615857714,"score_spread":0.22460312601757515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014659821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060985718,0.011708029,0.030709464,0.058097545,0.0005576606,0.000046519162,0.000092130875,0.00009451621,0.8377085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97429866,0.0027597107,0.0026702934,0.0018078821,0.00036715713,0.000052621246,0.000033335116,0.000030906278,0.017979423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751294,0.0011165813,0.000078505465,0.00042098446,0.00041056643,0.0004603485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716043,0.0014999142,0.0002687674,0.00054600573,0.00030706907,0.00021788271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022269853,0.00023022514,0.00036417914,0.001021691,0.0041259136,0.0072499993,0.0010852669,0.003402939,0.0050994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036733449,0.00019953193,0.00057792204,0.0011493055,0.03364002,0.009976701,0.0036204194,0.0030327588,0.00056311046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001554717,0.000002356071,0.000047830075,0.0000053858275,7.90712e-7,0.000017566595,0.00023133846,0.00017034012,0.000013642715,0.9984573,0.00024889104,0.00080284465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050961753,0.0000063432,0.00013338756,0.000021278296,0.000001809842,0.00002560853,0.00022592628,0.00051838416,0.000052113115,0.9782195,0.020787217,0.0000033300823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007587597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031174405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007587597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005771591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032141826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041876018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015089011","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0130","title":"The capabilities approach: A panacea for labour law’s ills?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Subject (documents); Politics; Panacea (medicine); Labour law; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017443473761506643,"score_gpt":0.2098335434216658,"score_spread":0.19239006966015915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015089011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009831569,0.02076523,0.06306944,0.63807964,0.0013833123,0.00004023538,0.00007095924,0.00010380766,0.26665577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88470274,0.01710103,0.016127374,0.04583344,0.0035244944,0.00022276083,0.000057145968,0.00017875506,0.032252263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913322,0.004204475,0.00033936306,0.0009819627,0.002118371,0.0010235481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882258,0.007326479,0.0010260179,0.0011121313,0.0010822115,0.0012275026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012507779,0.0009382121,0.0008182431,0.0037897252,0.0065564276,0.015406936,0.0025311548,0.008784721,0.006788749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016201252,0.00043021305,0.0009208864,0.0026358287,0.07956789,0.030896349,0.009974567,0.012540561,0.00099003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020547568,0.0000022475162,0.00004987439,0.000017648674,0.0000014462012,0.000010667764,0.0007315891,0.000052573414,0.000010401057,0.99581945,0.0012628303,0.002039175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003546592,0.000005212646,0.000071491915,0.0001293458,0.000001874322,0.000022206234,0.0013250014,0.0002312361,0.00003532319,0.9634238,0.034744166,0.0000069524845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014066233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012559003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015406936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011160036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013297042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080972075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022583908","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3796","title":"Destination-based cash-flow taxation: A critical appraisal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Economics; Double taxation; International taxation; Residence; Cash flow; Business; Multinational corporation; Intuition; Public economics; Microeconomics; Tax reform; Finance; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.02127260369165949,"score_gpt":0.24752137183647704,"score_spread":0.22624876814481756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022583908","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043051955,0.5412217,0.008612994,0.3120629,0.022296028,0.00025776197,0.00014599,0.000059120892,0.11103842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20090556,0.5691264,0.008993022,0.16009802,0.02981558,0.00069856277,0.00018456,0.00021621725,0.029962113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991747,0.0042512366,0.000514082,0.00072810863,0.0022855948,0.00047398047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574337,0.03564591,0.0008703837,0.0006786178,0.0050879717,0.00028332023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023511073,0.0010492041,0.0010196412,0.008391282,0.004508928,0.008307701,0.002730005,0.00978358,0.004792021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044973407,0.00071779883,0.0011758859,0.004773958,0.016312607,0.014042815,0.0029951048,0.015270002,0.0014188827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039755872,0.00002647335,0.00011063528,0.0020174987,0.000014538717,0.000173331,0.003224796,0.00037702743,0.00009276546,0.8833588,0.06778293,0.04278153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001841759,0.000038712784,0.00028590925,0.010945148,0.000028896044,0.00012796136,0.003578804,0.00041501297,0.0003617447,0.13856708,0.84558445,0.000047926973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008820917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068743206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018564427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009800757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.134695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026722079","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0054","title":"The Gross Indecency of Criminalizing HIV Non-Disclosure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Supreme court; Queer; Criminal code; Law; Parliament; Narrative; Reading (process); Deviance (statistics); Political science; Criminology; Promiscuity; Sociology; Criminal law; Gender studies; Psychology; Literature; Art; Politics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.016564982803276448,"score_gpt":0.24723187501469737,"score_spread":0.23066689221142092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026722079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18395616,0.0044926265,0.0051520304,0.10893253,0.00084320543,0.000049082777,0.00013670119,0.0000702382,0.69636744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96720916,0.0011518882,0.00052190176,0.008229552,0.00014193749,0.00001150777,0.000022166201,0.000024881661,0.022686956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945656,0.0013696426,0.000120855606,0.00044579152,0.002079891,0.0014181852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549353,0.0020431995,0.00060696306,0.00047197042,0.0007525214,0.0006317448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042983205,0.00022263851,0.00023575046,0.0012025463,0.014952491,0.008669107,0.0010657148,0.0029623709,0.0028432705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012212624,0.000302732,0.00021679176,0.0007753282,0.06490857,0.004147382,0.0059609017,0.0085379835,0.00024909686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135223245,0.0000064570027,0.0020332858,0.000028550528,0.0000049549735,0.0002851626,0.069099054,0.000101715676,0.00034905347,0.9113789,0.0068822303,0.00981705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018338182,0.000056774297,0.023075243,0.0006924214,0.00004179967,0.001593085,0.12738167,0.0005553478,0.0026847553,0.18178596,0.66196674,0.00014787364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.510447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67334545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48955297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019715026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025691677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9848721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027621733","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0082","title":"Homosexuality and Prostitution: A Tale of Two Deviancies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Queer; Homosexuality; Criminalization; Mainstream; Politics; Gender studies; Sociology; Framing (construction); Criminology; Context (archaeology); Queer theory; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0194425250841066,"score_gpt":0.26364761702526873,"score_spread":0.24420509194116213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027621733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0434996,0.14438297,0.0040004128,0.6301263,0.007649243,0.000070214046,0.00013003245,0.00010372808,0.17003745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67799884,0.11122985,0.0039111692,0.10374652,0.012062515,0.00021040722,0.00014714223,0.00028163946,0.090411864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962322,0.0017270816,0.00013916014,0.00040011446,0.000885526,0.00061596406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569845,0.002277834,0.00026863173,0.0003741113,0.00049682584,0.0008841333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039393026,0.00080814905,0.0011380921,0.0037055097,0.011816968,0.012683483,0.0011286299,0.00644934,0.0057174596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006054333,0.00040663703,0.00066495663,0.0019928368,0.07646878,0.015509741,0.0149803795,0.014042737,0.00060820347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003426412,0.00008405256,0.0015452352,0.00016934516,0.000016451364,0.00062191964,0.10719766,0.00006672615,0.00019224802,0.84073985,0.019361703,0.029970497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019580684,0.00007839245,0.0028522199,0.0012986955,0.000027749724,0.0008938998,0.11747727,0.00016436732,0.00018877082,0.4817788,0.39513937,0.00008097351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029991256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035367403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029991256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074484646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008832253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059633374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039870728","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0058","title":"The 1969 Criminal Amendments: Constituting the Terms of Gay Resistance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Resistance (ecology); Human sexuality; Homosexuality; Criminal code; Criminology; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminal law","score_opus":0.036123578123288036,"score_gpt":0.27417815928338146,"score_spread":0.23805458116009343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039870728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27609184,0.00610903,0.0038309097,0.06915629,0.0014428591,0.00009701472,0.00011042003,0.00004581235,0.64311576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96653116,0.0011782447,0.0006489065,0.0060455445,0.0003608187,0.00003475124,0.000019798055,0.000027468479,0.025153248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98952967,0.0040529734,0.0004221189,0.00087135215,0.0027810077,0.002342853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947114,0.0027510023,0.00082842144,0.0005171902,0.0008016986,0.0003903275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051399474,0.0002844542,0.00033677602,0.0015152076,0.012348778,0.009668696,0.0008683338,0.0062725674,0.0023247944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012886396,0.0005233839,0.0005178425,0.0011649445,0.040040266,0.003297573,0.0051669194,0.0105121,0.00040807386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001667263,0.0000102958165,0.00043964435,0.000011206355,0.000002562296,0.0002627115,0.019679237,0.00012781868,0.00024015423,0.9736443,0.0020641817,0.0035011868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008478291,0.00008925887,0.008215432,0.0006403587,0.000038177604,0.00060839753,0.02991689,0.00070387684,0.0025834846,0.22602758,0.7309414,0.00015036523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12909149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10430054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12909149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021630112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013084177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2566802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039919733","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0100","title":"Angela Fernandez, <i>Pierson v. Post, The Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Professionalization; Legal culture; Political science; Law; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.023642886250249066,"score_gpt":0.30790902438735934,"score_spread":0.28426613813711027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039919733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003440006,0.019066961,0.00027590146,0.9126396,0.0052123345,0.00002106824,0.00018113344,0.000039444865,0.05912353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16073261,0.043541078,0.0010946178,0.5836568,0.0066313683,0.00015495044,0.00021565006,0.00013912708,0.20383386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980925,0.00044095388,0.000088331,0.0002460678,0.0007770664,0.0003551479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994709,0.0033174516,0.00030147724,0.00009270397,0.00093394227,0.00064549345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022213536,0.00046026925,0.000244278,0.0008690427,0.008819993,0.0068944586,0.0017720356,0.011063142,0.0069875014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012427109,0.00046325027,0.00035624937,0.00091648835,0.0049218214,0.005259535,0.002134246,0.009289536,0.0012288498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014815103,0.000011867873,0.00082366436,0.00005756158,0.000004270108,0.00011938213,0.0014845292,0.000026838203,0.000064681895,0.061676916,0.9299584,0.0057570566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038434275,0.000019990448,0.00792447,0.00051324005,0.000035420788,0.00022013446,0.010825286,0.00017737983,0.0006086274,0.018745955,0.9608411,0.000050080394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20022237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5062702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20022237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00729681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016856361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3981139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042348065","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0043","title":"The constitutional office of the legislature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Normative; Constitutional theory; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional review; Sociology; Constitution; Physics","score_opus":0.016714622466399664,"score_gpt":0.22174458412907877,"score_spread":0.20502996166267912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042348065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04316799,0.008121789,0.016717354,0.031724013,0.00076712365,0.000043761967,0.000272117,0.000111368456,0.8990745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431599,0.002189225,0.0021169167,0.0023497879,0.0005360099,0.00004596225,0.00011877487,0.00004381718,0.0494397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948095,0.0021076738,0.00022398456,0.00080337434,0.0011737334,0.0008817398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995395,0.0022375472,0.000437762,0.0005582767,0.00075406,0.0006173549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056608827,0.00014817266,0.0003878133,0.000901927,0.0035779593,0.007262351,0.00067371235,0.0017376248,0.0043377993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077733467,0.00025294308,0.00019350428,0.00088521134,0.019282991,0.0032426652,0.0026223825,0.0028951464,0.00078052253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002887878,0.0000012345948,0.000088427274,0.00000624431,9.776438e-7,0.000007758122,0.00091218343,0.00003156606,0.00006422421,0.99604744,0.00092634244,0.0019108319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031267293,0.000037155194,0.002480751,0.00017298681,0.00002026507,0.000066545974,0.002147267,0.00036152502,0.0005761252,0.44488192,0.5491969,0.000027298305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03284262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03863441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03284262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005938375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013705925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06530297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043080976","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0031","title":"The office of ownership revisited","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Property (philosophy); Easement; Law and economics; Business; Property rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028994996894398883,"score_gpt":0.2555444730131005,"score_spread":0.22654947611870163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043080976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056481875,0.01629226,0.026260858,0.177083,0.0017715858,0.000041416504,0.00011746684,0.000067172296,0.7218843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412241,0.0037531215,0.0012952164,0.01171509,0.0016390685,0.000060555692,0.000037106023,0.00007289241,0.040202916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265033,0.0025448161,0.00022778138,0.0011676266,0.0019070372,0.0015023955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947819,0.0033110804,0.0004339847,0.00047961876,0.00058362895,0.000409672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057572518,0.00037989306,0.00061391667,0.0011858525,0.0063332175,0.009043228,0.0018504752,0.0071796514,0.007686542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009726354,0.00034930868,0.00075477205,0.0012125554,0.03916086,0.017484704,0.007550649,0.010060059,0.00066486315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003204108,0.0000016014208,0.000053777647,0.0000049632536,6.219995e-7,0.000022009282,0.0008173519,0.000022895661,0.000010396578,0.9970999,0.0009769951,0.000986358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028271326,0.000025936224,0.0006748836,0.00019928701,0.000011794978,0.00015372428,0.0031512785,0.00054977334,0.00026832015,0.771461,0.22345327,0.00002234838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025570873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014690045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025570873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008727169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059498814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06332028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043467281","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0036","title":"Between sovereign and subject: the constitutional position of the official","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Sovereignty; Law; Duty; Political science; Constitutional law; Position (finance); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.019582561218891577,"score_gpt":0.23923233259021656,"score_spread":0.219649771371325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043467281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120314516,0.004691178,0.025103966,0.050408326,0.0006855809,0.00005927459,0.00007908515,0.000080439575,0.7985776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98595744,0.0005320715,0.0010427877,0.001093321,0.00016790134,0.000027613602,0.000011613067,0.00003601764,0.011131228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886801,0.00655598,0.00036707264,0.0015344433,0.0017276175,0.001134766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934297,0.0041965186,0.0004600665,0.0006366677,0.0006097821,0.0006672379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010085863,0.00024362325,0.0006933193,0.0012344363,0.010212765,0.011296418,0.0008256028,0.0033436662,0.0036799246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012901312,0.00040026885,0.00030573198,0.0013217838,0.051845174,0.0071593984,0.0050736186,0.005126219,0.0003595227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000434059,0.0000027667197,0.00014088018,0.0000054547763,0.000001770373,0.000019659483,0.007593309,0.00003460701,0.00006769917,0.99052715,0.00049053674,0.0011119739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005622867,0.00006954872,0.0019149991,0.00024128442,0.00004040266,0.000114538576,0.015507312,0.00048749297,0.0005735543,0.82524556,0.15569825,0.00005088623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027806804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033455618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027806804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008323993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010854376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06039512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043611909","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0032","title":"Office and contracting-out: an analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Odds; Phenomenon; Government (linguistics); Public office; Business; Service (business); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02467461157356531,"score_gpt":0.2708792790045017,"score_spread":0.24620466743093639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043611909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3652,0.0021560257,0.02685313,0.010372539,0.00012069384,0.00018641622,0.00012576245,0.000028537379,0.5949568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839272,0.00093818543,0.0017694285,0.00046597718,0.00006578464,0.000055314074,0.000038756083,0.000019724836,0.012719575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965785,0.0013253767,0.000090317655,0.00018544568,0.0006060476,0.0012143854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966608,0.0022198448,0.0003229584,0.00017857802,0.0002959213,0.00032185824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030700427,0.0002592047,0.00041842894,0.0016745683,0.009276091,0.005091954,0.0010310182,0.0016865436,0.009069502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00503641,0.00018539856,0.0007730633,0.0024180366,0.012272617,0.004913431,0.004896971,0.0025609538,0.00035827898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025331485,0.00003793846,0.0018517188,0.000026522215,0.0000021594954,0.00041332364,0.012349513,0.00021577827,0.000055374127,0.9791829,0.0009860366,0.0048534907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077803066,0.0001433163,0.015298749,0.00043663947,0.000054552533,0.0011641075,0.11490705,0.008500569,0.0012358851,0.6396069,0.21850538,0.00006893778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02406405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019980213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02406405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005885676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056045884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047847986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043982908","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0003","title":"Catalytic agents? Lon Fuller, James Milner, and the lawyer as social architect, 1950–69","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Scholarship; Law; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Variety (cybernetics); Legal education; Political science","score_opus":0.029968031947274987,"score_gpt":0.2937238616934155,"score_spread":0.26375582974614054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043982908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040803093,0.12062737,0.0024433304,0.4512909,0.0022037297,0.00003880839,0.000059761347,0.000047176352,0.38248584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77850133,0.04067126,0.0017679807,0.042704638,0.001456568,0.00009000223,0.000038691873,0.000069169124,0.13470042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830735,0.0008437942,0.000039378425,0.00020112561,0.00029464363,0.00031361182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874806,0.00056206336,0.00010757194,0.000056731264,0.00013853525,0.00038691954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033819266,0.00048038215,0.00027057354,0.0012621852,0.015442189,0.008755327,0.0008747919,0.0051472774,0.0041533257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003575366,0.00041975334,0.00014739901,0.0012508675,0.04943266,0.008967117,0.0026824472,0.004450574,0.00054363336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007897405,0.000015271664,0.000357165,0.000021719512,0.0000015996669,0.000085963475,0.033642936,0.00006586618,0.000035818335,0.9039086,0.054878756,0.006978398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012146272,0.000011754452,0.0011208345,0.00022624967,0.0000034418338,0.00010862857,0.022644222,0.00011799079,0.00012104926,0.14990066,0.8257135,0.000019430023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23324034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36588234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23324034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03441473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017878404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46376544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044407179","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2019-0131","title":"Modern treaty making and the limits of the law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Sleep Society","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Aotearoa; Negotiation; Autonomy; Politics; Citizenship; Political science; Law; Indigenous; Colonialism; Pluralism (philosophy); Arms control","score_opus":0.02151780873752061,"score_gpt":0.25466739552123835,"score_spread":0.23314958678371775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044407179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048978947,0.016621465,0.025886646,0.17390323,0.0013282393,0.000093172406,0.00006244368,0.000117447606,0.7330085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510381,0.0042998763,0.0048936615,0.010647449,0.0009800409,0.00010929814,0.000028605215,0.000061016424,0.027941938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765271,0.010706201,0.0006413311,0.0023985235,0.0068756933,0.002851213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898252,0.005485603,0.0010033799,0.0012662646,0.0016280041,0.00079168065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02347756,0.0003245039,0.00067100185,0.0018820273,0.018578324,0.015930437,0.002474456,0.0074961637,0.0044921148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023630457,0.00055155996,0.0005339684,0.0017793459,0.099212594,0.015338743,0.0075267856,0.0129103325,0.00045636445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013653423,0.0000029740195,0.0000372629,0.000005998879,7.8347614e-7,0.000013643486,0.0021979955,0.000061367384,0.0000152509365,0.9954094,0.00083562464,0.0014182876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071704326,0.0000071003433,0.00028137103,0.00014094087,0.0000046804666,0.000031803265,0.0026602622,0.0003891992,0.0000648966,0.88741237,0.108979404,0.000020773005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104469754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07296203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8955302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038132828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028391223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27667433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045202888","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2019-0136","title":"A theory of mistaken assumptions in contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Appeal; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Freedom of contract; Common law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.033215750537898256,"score_gpt":0.2628744662742217,"score_spread":0.2296587157363234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045202888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040294435,0.0041675367,0.30710083,0.048095375,0.00071283156,0.00021939195,0.00022747177,0.00017624335,0.5990058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944938,0.0013218344,0.024322113,0.0054790475,0.0005836499,0.00031314715,0.00007155494,0.00006941576,0.02290125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804813,0.007703672,0.00084987405,0.002255954,0.006563288,0.0021459418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98067564,0.01260472,0.0014654984,0.0025277964,0.0021644745,0.00056186196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016649006,0.0007379903,0.0006794682,0.0026849357,0.007201407,0.010632423,0.003632121,0.0099075595,0.0071333805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026992816,0.00095387927,0.001468312,0.002122248,0.04522641,0.021723544,0.00651017,0.010805959,0.0011106177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011675891,0.0000013592769,0.000019992,0.0000025126678,6.8801484e-7,0.000013170224,0.0002118938,0.00009425139,0.000004460129,0.9992132,0.00016796151,0.00026924675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068481204,0.0000041090034,0.00002872304,0.000024382181,0.0000023638681,0.000029777191,0.00010239118,0.00096665666,0.000032492233,0.9932541,0.005542158,0.0000060546536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011541111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005968869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016649006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013309322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007904318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09656632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048661938","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0084","title":"Law and macroeconomics as mainstream","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Recession; Economics; Convention; Great recession; Keynesian economics; Economic analysis; Perspective (graphical); Mainstream economics; Monetary policy; Macroeconomics; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Applied economics; Classical economics","score_opus":0.014874719734636714,"score_gpt":0.17451865062101682,"score_spread":0.1596439308863801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048661938","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005053396,0.51665735,0.014704271,0.16978997,0.0070101502,0.000020118912,0.0002156391,0.00013056409,0.2864186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48210597,0.36072114,0.006383778,0.040663157,0.040141553,0.00011850064,0.00023426526,0.00026312438,0.06936858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724895,0.0010388201,0.0001016243,0.00044726016,0.00089642976,0.0002668735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953786,0.002951063,0.0003503321,0.0004080222,0.00061911374,0.00029282205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035024267,0.000535239,0.0009978546,0.0024534853,0.0020618003,0.009456238,0.0009025915,0.0042981287,0.006256129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007060388,0.00028391313,0.00042702226,0.0031049203,0.020772638,0.011128833,0.0020747534,0.0055920617,0.0012211773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002091006,0.000003527858,0.000049806247,0.000032909626,0.000001424806,0.000008176142,0.00015731597,0.00013180105,0.000013820701,0.99012756,0.005621262,0.003850436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030041115,0.000004965584,0.00025050194,0.00019902964,0.0000018780578,0.00001766448,0.00014195779,0.00029079747,0.00002029862,0.86772525,0.13134034,0.0000042854826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008763256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005088223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010826734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010826734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005298795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078553855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084730852","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0060","title":"Bureaucracy without alienation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Bureaucracy; Relevance (law); Statutory law; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Administrative law; Hegelianism; Deliberative democracy; Political philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.025055761804479246,"score_gpt":0.27097926936160094,"score_spread":0.2459235075571217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084730852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013418719,0.0038081247,0.018809298,0.055954456,0.0012361797,0.000057349123,0.00009347415,0.00014891654,0.9064736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7911747,0.0034261208,0.0037227483,0.015227531,0.0013553827,0.0001593681,0.00010415516,0.00019086472,0.18463904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151003,0.002149909,0.0002553218,0.0016658108,0.0027738425,0.0016450867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957918,0.0009752916,0.00039780413,0.0014689566,0.00078144995,0.0005846779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00502683,0.00047742407,0.0005365226,0.001287842,0.010173042,0.0101623405,0.0012299148,0.0036679844,0.009974054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009423372,0.00042105277,0.0006568212,0.0012456991,0.049532697,0.0075505455,0.0069647324,0.006457059,0.0032464557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020537082,0.000002201383,0.00005329609,0.0000070121464,0.0000011023571,0.0000119143515,0.0007038618,0.00003042448,0.000021649992,0.99453694,0.0029452555,0.0016843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017931116,0.000023661174,0.0007859131,0.00016479118,0.000009503891,0.00007674816,0.001558575,0.00023950785,0.00020674057,0.5617539,0.43514818,0.000014489188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026370758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025725227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026370758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010975886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016509421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07963598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085937296","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0040","title":"Office-holding and officiality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Law; Jurisprudence; Orthodoxy; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Subject (documents); Philosophy of law; Private law; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03044656825647138,"score_gpt":0.25779265439418997,"score_spread":0.2273460861377186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085937296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18838848,0.0031499753,0.027135441,0.02978793,0.00067743607,0.000051324612,0.000061162245,0.00012239491,0.7506259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887212,0.00036386907,0.00068334106,0.000620658,0.00011069454,0.000013783142,0.000012934747,0.00002886676,0.009444768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98975694,0.0039993473,0.00038348167,0.00161632,0.00220733,0.002036527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289036,0.002501621,0.0011018629,0.0011327419,0.00095616945,0.0014173297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072654425,0.0002669572,0.0004934199,0.0010912946,0.010311837,0.009645702,0.0011757318,0.002360019,0.0037274698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010098454,0.00030158288,0.00034252866,0.0010553906,0.06550101,0.0074784965,0.007795382,0.005551086,0.00052859046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063510042,0.000009515774,0.0003838935,0.000010434919,0.0000013596278,0.00004399579,0.014976805,0.00004026906,0.00008163328,0.980755,0.0007294578,0.0029613278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030140325,0.00006979502,0.0029255857,0.00022545928,0.000018505838,0.00018631399,0.027991332,0.0003650273,0.0007107184,0.83371687,0.13372096,0.000039329367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01865549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014924643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01865549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007361427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009136263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053411126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086279047","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0053","title":"Conscientious refusal to provide medically assisted dying","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Patient rights; Health care; Nursing; Medicine; Law; Political science; Public relations; Family medicine","score_opus":0.07855758155362169,"score_gpt":0.34001142564304593,"score_spread":0.26145384408942424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086279047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13538082,0.0046815514,0.004091574,0.4911018,0.0023032755,0.000118078904,0.00012089509,0.000080878686,0.36212108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81668246,0.0011103029,0.0007353748,0.15169632,0.0004875919,0.000042492095,0.000029206309,0.00001848537,0.029197833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883189,0.0030648853,0.00055795716,0.0010177081,0.0031908236,0.0038496533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870207,0.0062469966,0.00136483,0.0007222267,0.0022672694,0.0023779233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010889141,0.00021924441,0.0003277808,0.000480191,0.02016974,0.0049224407,0.0014500334,0.010083535,0.003514139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022058891,0.0003422861,0.00050338503,0.00043419216,0.028643075,0.002834699,0.0057197018,0.014254873,0.00041578282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003922296,0.000061481755,0.010549049,0.00009510056,0.000019727207,0.0025764734,0.06147751,0.00019611181,0.00057157065,0.8354067,0.068892926,0.020114074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007215346,0.00014930226,0.024402179,0.0011964274,0.00004477223,0.0035585002,0.05014948,0.00086677354,0.001049041,0.08272917,0.8355387,0.00024350236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5195138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6883493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5195138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02226107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046507906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96663177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086337398","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0038","title":"Office and profession in the design of modern institutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Marxism and Critical Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Function (biology); Bureaucracy; Public relations; Nexus (standard); Element (criminal law); Political science; Work (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Public administration; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06259458247983132,"score_gpt":0.22740598599554662,"score_spread":0.1648114035157153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086337398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075187765,0.006227028,0.19697483,0.028550103,0.0005556794,0.00019288216,0.00006769006,0.0002769893,0.691967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511061,0.0012574352,0.024255581,0.0009528885,0.00024388815,0.0001847544,0.000022874961,0.00007588535,0.021900631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961467,0.0065197125,0.00031916884,0.00081698265,0.0015411092,0.0011884657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960743,0.001623389,0.0005362385,0.00067025115,0.00047977315,0.00061608315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00782156,0.00042483213,0.00046902365,0.0021101176,0.006164991,0.011430052,0.0013294733,0.0031771767,0.0039803055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006340069,0.0005216306,0.0005533451,0.0013732937,0.06986337,0.008633727,0.0052310843,0.0026109335,0.00060626026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028542252,0.0000021288233,0.0000761098,0.000008762118,9.476255e-7,0.0000103848115,0.0012559418,0.00018607423,0.000019175788,0.9973392,0.00018568937,0.0009127334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015122817,0.000014027769,0.0002173249,0.000051795232,0.0000037721975,0.000042528096,0.0015368608,0.0007592086,0.00009748742,0.9625818,0.034668714,0.000011285246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047593922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043802443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012899289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012899289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010003786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09359133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090799164","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0062","title":"Contracts, markets, and justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contract theory; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Sociology; Position (finance); Social contract; Law; Distributive property; Economics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.018782845608439687,"score_gpt":0.2456214040471554,"score_spread":0.22683855843871573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090799164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016665854,0.12968247,0.018218948,0.20821092,0.0022851329,0.000055383793,0.000112552436,0.00006387146,0.6247049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7252082,0.06057187,0.0059543955,0.019283831,0.0022649434,0.000118501106,0.00007313945,0.000086296284,0.18643875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983917,0.0007657485,0.000030664283,0.00013243301,0.00044391345,0.0002354344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986858,0.0008543209,0.00009202841,0.00006661734,0.00015199714,0.0001492124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018538118,0.00032441886,0.0003423579,0.0007840366,0.0033754027,0.0054513584,0.0005253767,0.0027819064,0.0047814627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003469403,0.00023509815,0.00017714585,0.0014009726,0.016417801,0.0046214634,0.0014168264,0.0026590708,0.00058722636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038796384,0.0000031035213,0.000060563736,0.000018942275,0.0000012144225,0.000016104366,0.00055501674,0.00011905032,0.000018957384,0.9802663,0.015685357,0.0032514906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005053815,0.0000091144675,0.00032405485,0.00010856787,0.0000019243369,0.000051746665,0.0011494873,0.00030573335,0.000056243483,0.77449507,0.22348607,0.000007002482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015143594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016314281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015143594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006794957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005867004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049301088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106304731","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0066","title":"Notwithstanding rights, review, or remedy? On the notwithstanding clause and the operation of legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.04378781811301545,"score_gpt":0.26094789933883056,"score_spread":0.2171600812258151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106304731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028901108,0.023727214,0.013028962,0.3223403,0.002415347,0.00013156349,0.000112102694,0.000096727264,0.6092467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79834646,0.00918619,0.0037516714,0.08700168,0.0039013408,0.00020297115,0.000086826854,0.000122058766,0.09740084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872759,0.0050612865,0.0004966145,0.0019032487,0.0030459038,0.0022170425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98881793,0.00677565,0.0009907732,0.0015459439,0.0014352199,0.00043454985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0151191,0.00030272422,0.0007135777,0.0010267211,0.005837409,0.015445588,0.0019995386,0.012939953,0.005054799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02553224,0.00040768425,0.0006147845,0.0012268738,0.060060825,0.013723456,0.0030878668,0.008696593,0.00093193114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024644876,0.0000019924485,0.000037715865,0.0000064169,7.385957e-7,0.000014546908,0.0008061706,0.000016034624,0.00002889295,0.9957557,0.0023121813,0.0010171862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040473835,0.000044023687,0.0011807181,0.0005119862,0.000025471014,0.000106217616,0.0037923516,0.00032765995,0.00045184352,0.6738276,0.31964162,0.00005002057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049175028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041171227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049175028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0121344505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018632218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097777605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106859394","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0067","title":"Ownership and offices: the building blocks of the legal order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legitimacy; Order (exchange); Possession (linguistics); Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Property rights; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0216388014336906,"score_gpt":0.24339178786570423,"score_spread":0.22175298643201363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106859394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053177107,0.0049370974,0.059616506,0.034234945,0.00034863813,0.000102047925,0.00019226268,0.00018197666,0.8472094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547494,0.0015923554,0.008426002,0.0019258794,0.00035021297,0.0000982568,0.00007110144,0.0000775502,0.032709133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953629,0.001795677,0.00021390438,0.0006263504,0.0011214027,0.0008796817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957818,0.0021415416,0.00051542633,0.0007384409,0.0003341205,0.0004887126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031124388,0.00027740028,0.00042970196,0.0011607357,0.005947471,0.010009364,0.0010727328,0.0034232035,0.007491274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007348372,0.00052334205,0.00042780678,0.0011894867,0.06494138,0.011155707,0.0055242926,0.004352938,0.001015124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025447796,0.0000017546668,0.000083151084,0.000005747462,5.1072965e-7,0.000017725833,0.0011855698,0.00005094634,0.000023519671,0.99673754,0.0006409726,0.0012499848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016136006,0.000017651815,0.00094113895,0.00009552525,0.0000047041376,0.00008195243,0.001717723,0.00044226996,0.00016753041,0.91170496,0.08479641,0.000014110952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029348578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023618711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029348578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065920884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008076594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05835551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107133429","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0059","title":"The geometry of property","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Dominion; Property (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Horizontal and vertical; Geometry; Law and economics; Property rights; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Geology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012833805231550914,"score_gpt":0.21276409291767012,"score_spread":0.1999302876861192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107133429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054584544,0.005050983,0.14448087,0.011116185,0.00023546723,0.00007914282,0.00053971104,0.0002103342,0.7837028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545469,0.0019126297,0.018189708,0.00060741295,0.00019815768,0.000110125395,0.00022641542,0.000094890755,0.024113804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974915,0.00088103174,0.00011605194,0.0006214817,0.0005754932,0.00031445865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864167,0.0004032547,0.00019084661,0.0003798467,0.00023589053,0.00014859407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014358547,0.000379695,0.00035335842,0.0013979864,0.004395292,0.008510783,0.0010237986,0.001728672,0.007962176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031190284,0.00036444466,0.00055642024,0.0015403653,0.0346938,0.008616481,0.0039263186,0.0017412223,0.0010653589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010489182,4.2792428e-7,0.00003233138,0.0000026395262,5.628425e-7,0.000008564601,0.00016878378,0.000115720526,0.000021138947,0.99900156,0.00018276804,0.00046439827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006201313,0.000008325448,0.00030883815,0.000018168017,0.0000032893556,0.00006285987,0.0004995409,0.0006819881,0.00009774098,0.94450116,0.05380513,0.0000067806745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0153680835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007130369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153680835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065463935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019603828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04749763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107210760","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0085","title":"Policing and public office","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Order (exchange); Public office; Law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Public order; State (computer science); Ancien regime; Sociology; Business; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03162895750013965,"score_gpt":0.19954860960417878,"score_spread":0.16791965210403914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107210760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03239775,0.0034078995,0.014331534,0.03642407,0.0007272966,0.00006169072,0.00008745155,0.00011729461,0.912445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8938721,0.0012892105,0.0015700356,0.0040484276,0.00045570402,0.000051696545,0.00005467538,0.000071327006,0.098586805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946404,0.0012479968,0.00016996622,0.0007894345,0.0010776082,0.0020746903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968182,0.000842677,0.0005221575,0.0005261111,0.0005058582,0.00078498875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022997875,0.00038499132,0.0003998343,0.0010353777,0.012711351,0.00953373,0.0011451354,0.0041451906,0.015128453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053883763,0.00033192956,0.00042666926,0.0009750025,0.032079328,0.0059531964,0.0076729613,0.003903234,0.001462133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006591991,0.000006596532,0.00033800874,0.000013672595,0.0000014041707,0.00007524576,0.0025884772,0.00012640844,0.000021561294,0.9878842,0.004480652,0.004457146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003208476,0.000049752744,0.0025028184,0.0003539073,0.000018076478,0.00032027822,0.010226608,0.00083162275,0.0004458398,0.45164752,0.5335315,0.000039988092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13068224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11913067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13068224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014924005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015180222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25984317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107770851","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2020-0056","title":"A unified model of public law: Charter values and reasonableness review in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Administrative law; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Normative; Judicial review; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.040249437279116576,"score_gpt":0.2285426591580825,"score_spread":0.1882932218789659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107770851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0669076,0.022549305,0.040594645,0.22764336,0.0007895757,0.00041430883,0.0010013665,0.00028256077,0.6398173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490793,0.00482158,0.013751065,0.006087572,0.00015791795,0.00014104253,0.00018806879,0.000071881695,0.025701601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840259,0.0040917187,0.0005040636,0.0015138017,0.0066053118,0.0032591894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827293,0.005193664,0.00078410766,0.001134309,0.008213892,0.0019447164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012573631,0.00039329633,0.00097051216,0.0055367895,0.015413983,0.019876305,0.0028576753,0.0047351667,0.0035676549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027937986,0.00063390366,0.00076614413,0.0066159787,0.027067231,0.006820343,0.0035963575,0.006541515,0.00027322109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004624261,0.000004582944,0.00032897922,0.00001673769,0.0000038116136,0.00004003016,0.0011699788,0.00086434523,0.000021337917,0.99033207,0.00403427,0.003179289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047648475,0.000021467818,0.0046668663,0.00038449513,0.000045482062,0.00006681733,0.00414537,0.009524599,0.00025126073,0.7858867,0.19482218,0.00013714368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98461574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70658386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29341617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35890236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8195371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108520199","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0100","title":"The question of fairness in contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; State (computer science); Political science; Law enforcement; Rule of law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016863510070994417,"score_gpt":0.27115745184663353,"score_spread":0.25429394177563913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108520199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03603137,0.05431497,0.14638753,0.24888489,0.003928625,0.00017427123,0.00017986393,0.00009946348,0.5099991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181651,0.014312329,0.020707555,0.014906728,0.0055969153,0.00022125675,0.00007256061,0.000127119,0.025890464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96362686,0.018866656,0.0013958162,0.0040478855,0.008974689,0.003088065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641533,0.02579774,0.0018369694,0.0032763998,0.0037124562,0.0012231207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036365602,0.0005869206,0.0014690659,0.0021606146,0.0097002275,0.014309946,0.003191245,0.009912485,0.003968178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06448492,0.000575016,0.0009947248,0.0029441367,0.057196774,0.016842198,0.004977891,0.009324762,0.00094684644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039602783,0.0000029667028,0.00006258838,0.000013158921,0.0000027664341,0.0000136335375,0.00040918172,0.00012008978,0.000011695675,0.9965322,0.00084715395,0.0019805103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057406896,0.000005884139,0.00007252024,0.000059292965,0.0000030703734,0.000020641555,0.00018131158,0.00028150677,0.000028844164,0.98867303,0.010663333,0.0000048071634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013887725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050617224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036365602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013002266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015329816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19232196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109455559","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0068","title":"Private law offices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Representation (politics); Private law; Commercial law; Business; Identity (music); Task (project management); Political science; Public law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.022886487446781616,"score_gpt":0.2503122336098992,"score_spread":0.22742574616311756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109455559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024432808,0.0020286336,0.009785897,0.010032831,0.00026244696,0.000102814534,0.00017552836,0.00012458986,0.9530544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7170013,0.0015250399,0.0032535344,0.0030678194,0.00032437904,0.0001156092,0.00011484766,0.00006387713,0.27453354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431276,0.0012752849,0.00020677295,0.0008790361,0.001531883,0.00179433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955695,0.0011764143,0.0006304078,0.0006954494,0.0006824881,0.0012457032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019327308,0.00023207375,0.00030899225,0.0008032527,0.007158104,0.009430012,0.0011649672,0.0027686767,0.02537998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055649537,0.0004227772,0.0002588609,0.0008378461,0.011069843,0.006398608,0.005009697,0.0024254587,0.0042787082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070907804,0.000010535218,0.0005631825,0.000021872136,0.0000011231556,0.00008919216,0.002680633,0.000045707948,0.00009751512,0.97507983,0.009308119,0.012095167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013973354,0.000037550228,0.002055407,0.00021216822,0.000007735771,0.00026334927,0.0052158576,0.00022224715,0.0002842712,0.100612074,0.89105856,0.00001680733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016388353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025582379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02537998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005890298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0101234475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08490449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111648035","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0039","title":"Private law rights as democratic participation: Kelsen on private law and (economic) democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Private law; Law; Public law; Ideology; Political science; Comparative law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02063517685177603,"score_gpt":0.25169710591330874,"score_spread":0.23106192906153272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111648035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045645643,0.03590591,0.032662354,0.22535668,0.0013763838,0.0000579611,0.00009690047,0.000061968705,0.65883625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9127263,0.011655757,0.0040567694,0.01921215,0.0013702438,0.0001203231,0.000044452096,0.000086259715,0.05072771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583983,0.0022530663,0.00010026092,0.0005202076,0.000786211,0.0005003938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562293,0.003407921,0.00026891968,0.00029466007,0.00026686562,0.00013875909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051236777,0.00046396643,0.0004549675,0.0014594586,0.0044382927,0.008123537,0.00089140824,0.00511119,0.005569996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006273552,0.0002722392,0.00043888733,0.0018992625,0.041343898,0.017816234,0.005723885,0.007154079,0.00073666085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018029234,0.000002790793,0.000017114407,0.000005271742,4.1007863e-7,0.000007267369,0.0008514451,0.000050163067,0.000008354692,0.9976338,0.0006902245,0.00073140056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048530965,0.000004411186,0.000060304443,0.00006548314,0.0000010052057,0.000011456816,0.0005487492,0.0001682055,0.000038472208,0.96565783,0.03343363,0.0000055276464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005337147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004750682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008123537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065015247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035764922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04717207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113173929","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2020-0110","title":"Taking tort seriously","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.029116114515872076,"score_gpt":0.2620778172179014,"score_spread":0.23296170270202934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113173929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003829347,0.15525526,0.013282231,0.42044964,0.012900822,0.000042687483,0.00015210816,0.00017213772,0.39391583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26466382,0.089471824,0.00712854,0.38586748,0.02444723,0.0001710034,0.00028267328,0.0003098387,0.22765759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526405,0.0016934562,0.0002190697,0.00088266906,0.0015151415,0.0004256833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961218,0.0021809514,0.0002621389,0.00036860528,0.00080460944,0.00026174722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037262286,0.0008743665,0.00067701,0.001857242,0.005513414,0.010232638,0.0014768062,0.014252889,0.015216154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008633732,0.00032756774,0.0010436539,0.0009537402,0.013209347,0.012686415,0.0047902497,0.012429503,0.0030139734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003847589,0.0000066780053,0.00013577663,0.00008098575,0.0000059271883,0.000076414944,0.0011188275,0.00012746705,0.000060092305,0.9263951,0.05790684,0.014082055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027931135,0.000012399006,0.00029719458,0.00044149286,0.000008777065,0.00018038359,0.0012076761,0.0001640539,0.00010965041,0.2846863,0.71287847,0.000010850639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009536222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012127713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015216154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006181505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005113062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050903082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121146652","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0014","title":"Reflecting back on the future of labour law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Labour law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Collective bargaining; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025781302255975545,"score_gpt":0.2652584007141061,"score_spread":0.23947709845813056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121146652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005766276,0.050349876,0.0019974636,0.7376559,0.0056705684,0.00001798006,0.00025915843,0.00006191741,0.1982209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41837743,0.07476283,0.0051128846,0.297461,0.007534039,0.0000527179,0.00034407532,0.00020466432,0.1961503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99000835,0.0017034528,0.00016729833,0.00088517444,0.004430526,0.0028051755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916437,0.0021906255,0.00019062874,0.0003515341,0.0043864707,0.0012369453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007110786,0.000594361,0.0006890144,0.0030802418,0.019051393,0.019187352,0.0029717218,0.00955359,0.014654976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012351505,0.0003452453,0.00071138045,0.0029560388,0.042554367,0.013842998,0.0037701766,0.016369907,0.0017588565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008743103,0.000007200911,0.00018833869,0.000047151847,0.00000300335,0.000051415424,0.0033881022,0.00014133021,0.00006736661,0.9019285,0.08393463,0.010234193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059034674,0.000005733471,0.0006854294,0.0004980554,0.0000055595942,0.000035303783,0.0068689263,0.00022752689,0.00007119417,0.18749788,0.8040605,0.000038021637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.940444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9393398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14823215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1107798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121219761","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.403","title":"Culture and Competitive Resource Regulation: A Liberal Economic Alternative to Sui Generis Aboriginal Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006731780988225742,"score_gpt":0.24147619663305475,"score_spread":0.234744415644829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121219761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09445381,0.0011817799,0.014967556,0.059009038,0.00022812742,0.0000472269,0.000028421324,0.000028284696,0.8300557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828079,0.00023956191,0.0015153447,0.0034071857,0.000098087876,0.00005100923,0.000005540398,0.000007206311,0.011868318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940546,0.0027768482,0.00013019543,0.0004505258,0.0012314101,0.0013563028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964959,0.0013767459,0.00043782342,0.00069490727,0.00054951716,0.00044511614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00602748,0.00025703732,0.00035669885,0.0008451814,0.0060618473,0.0070778085,0.0013821088,0.0038087906,0.002480812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006625758,0.00026657112,0.00045934442,0.0007102364,0.045412283,0.0031349533,0.0054093264,0.0042943773,0.00023945548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029209864,0.0000038286385,0.00013913185,0.000003521303,0.0000011671989,0.000022218399,0.0010352894,0.000117282165,0.00004202606,0.9975733,0.00022870526,0.0008305609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003356418,0.00003914157,0.0016238025,0.00010210217,0.000012385289,0.00009460989,0.0045205816,0.001184885,0.0004000543,0.93130153,0.060655825,0.000031468713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030075753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0465832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009667294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013262431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070141435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121572313","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0038","title":"Sizing up private law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simplicity; Private law; Law and economics; Law; Function (biology); Political science; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Public law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01597979342325995,"score_gpt":0.17613633175462592,"score_spread":0.16015653833136598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121572313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041314207,0.0037438003,0.14995009,0.07518866,0.0011942877,0.0001387235,0.00013619247,0.0003388864,0.7279952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90799785,0.0022614324,0.03041915,0.007108076,0.00085060997,0.00017261869,0.0001188496,0.00027508728,0.0507964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928517,0.002726496,0.0002993569,0.0012784065,0.0019979635,0.0008461028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123305,0.0036482916,0.00055809494,0.0025091623,0.0012767114,0.00077460974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010034969,0.0007543363,0.0007164529,0.0026794435,0.007315829,0.017679194,0.001390391,0.0053816824,0.012308976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015596644,0.00059199176,0.0010257439,0.0013178455,0.037763234,0.02609754,0.00999375,0.009101308,0.002330771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022257677,0.000003914477,0.00008088157,0.0000092562195,0.0000012621665,0.000020876567,0.00061910227,0.00011272921,0.000049963975,0.9953198,0.0008720373,0.002907893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047662575,0.000009157775,0.00014043943,0.00007359198,0.000005059328,0.000050594226,0.00074263697,0.00091561116,0.00016836957,0.9541694,0.043711912,0.000008301085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00339975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003370815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017679194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008303165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008356233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060243964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121922778","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0065","title":"Regional Competition Law Agreements: An Important Step For Antitrust Enforcement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Publishing; Enforcement; Politics; The Renaissance; Indigenous; Political science; Slavic languages; Economic history; Sociology; Law; Media studies; History; Classics; Art history","score_opus":0.02003147405143842,"score_gpt":0.21157537182185143,"score_spread":0.191543897770413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121922778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008238817,0.0056393254,0.07035668,0.40096334,0.0019584259,0.00015473289,0.0002131877,0.00051689305,0.51195854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72203404,0.005244427,0.06748924,0.08641901,0.0023379435,0.00032436883,0.00028017233,0.00058574893,0.11528498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881682,0.0038450193,0.00046281368,0.001655252,0.003863884,0.0020047554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704643,0.011516703,0.0020332707,0.0058640256,0.0065520075,0.0035697415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017449008,0.00046327568,0.0010750941,0.0012700574,0.0070844707,0.015094035,0.0030835117,0.016269835,0.025117487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05014782,0.0006193305,0.00096799026,0.0015567939,0.017240234,0.018519348,0.0062081898,0.01478135,0.0054892953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004249305,0.000009597222,0.00013550429,0.00002868641,0.0000054960788,0.00006029171,0.00035147005,0.00030206895,0.00006516559,0.96491367,0.027451003,0.006672889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001604185,0.000019949523,0.0003792767,0.00028565706,0.000010660455,0.000110356435,0.0007806436,0.0007668156,0.00025284072,0.76831967,0.22902757,0.00003053606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036702015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036190037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036702015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008668508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028494278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09228027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121924561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.275","title":"EXCLUSION AND EXCLUSIVITY IN PROPERTY LAW","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Setter; Position (finance); Property law; Business; Tangible property; Law; Boundary (topology); Real property; Political science; Sociology; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.023045131689279037,"score_gpt":0.2465368943110173,"score_spread":0.22349176262173825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121924561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079468764,0.0050885347,0.2687724,0.02786374,0.00038962817,0.00013345198,0.00011389482,0.00017054904,0.61799896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96329015,0.0010517932,0.010068555,0.0021308372,0.00040033064,0.00028823846,0.0000618981,0.000079106234,0.022629114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98925054,0.004805311,0.00042392957,0.0016054278,0.0027876145,0.0011271653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99285746,0.0042334446,0.0006927507,0.0010556299,0.00073263637,0.00042805824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075286124,0.00048996217,0.0009888422,0.0017634027,0.006965177,0.007608313,0.0019211456,0.004779242,0.006825047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011449574,0.0005532583,0.0010473178,0.001430846,0.049845506,0.01710983,0.009191674,0.006793055,0.00089207734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000230099,0.000002777319,0.000055498884,0.0000048912966,9.3373757e-7,0.000012730557,0.00031423316,0.00008119969,0.000027046395,0.9987753,0.00014598099,0.00057714223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012013805,0.000010699565,0.00014086642,0.000039087176,0.0000034550067,0.000046720856,0.00023059663,0.00070055557,0.00008383209,0.98567766,0.013047363,0.000007075529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006329408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029441155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007608313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00587066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045593586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04259479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021911","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0215","title":"A theory of redressive justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Undoing; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Enforcement; Tort; Political science; Law; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.015587830290980638,"score_gpt":0.25685699440608467,"score_spread":0.24126916411510405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122021911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011182547,0.0019743063,0.2626035,0.015029225,0.0006684919,0.00011363136,0.00012135859,0.00013070709,0.7081763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80204225,0.0019278652,0.05632956,0.009459807,0.0011466126,0.00043833823,0.00016274091,0.00022340479,0.12826942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938221,0.002131963,0.00020512675,0.0012417237,0.0018620421,0.00073709234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959266,0.0016900186,0.00041630477,0.0009010639,0.00075763086,0.0003083749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058241547,0.0006019676,0.0006250595,0.0017574355,0.0047633736,0.005650515,0.0022166774,0.0041335383,0.0113262525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00702965,0.00038988492,0.0011011033,0.001053751,0.021560684,0.008643136,0.0045235744,0.0055783167,0.0017248843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6018345e-7,0.0000017948248,0.000022484264,0.0000028821,7.369009e-7,0.0000088088445,0.00013259855,0.00005806906,0.000008184252,0.9988802,0.000309791,0.00057389337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062021754,0.000007714596,0.00009223724,0.000034754292,0.0000040528957,0.00007049106,0.00016552428,0.0006574777,0.000049863283,0.965376,0.033529643,0.000005982878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051001036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047405898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113262525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047120852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046581025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037890077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122025944","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3558","title":"The utopian promise of private law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Dominion; Economic Justice; Private property; Utopia; Law and economics; Private law; Distributive property; Function (biology); Law; Sociology; Distributive justice; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02501029058460926,"score_gpt":0.2639183396345651,"score_spread":0.23890804904995586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122025944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032549754,0.0073601212,0.09794947,0.08724392,0.00071270776,0.000050974068,0.00012060275,0.00018457227,0.77382785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541637,0.0014445005,0.007608717,0.004374509,0.0004607756,0.00009492261,0.000029290506,0.00007700774,0.0317466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500763,0.0022868896,0.00012504112,0.0007935399,0.0010709148,0.0007159887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558455,0.0021642542,0.00030661825,0.0011343423,0.0004275139,0.0003827113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005976748,0.00038257684,0.0006491622,0.000942233,0.0071523692,0.011580922,0.0011235066,0.0046248883,0.004717451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008578101,0.0004494161,0.0006269248,0.0006751389,0.052152663,0.012373863,0.007416,0.0066715945,0.0007229931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023774596,0.0000015422859,0.00001762953,0.000003543178,6.747142e-7,0.000007054816,0.00024914922,0.00006829013,0.000013917834,0.9985831,0.00037792278,0.0006749018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045289366,0.000003139743,0.000039121434,0.000023286451,0.0000014867489,0.000015331281,0.00019455714,0.00019807927,0.0000517965,0.97948897,0.019975718,0.0000039347146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005553218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041541564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011580922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072285333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060616573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05244696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122179429","doi":"10.3138/utlj.11117-2","title":"CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND CONCEPTIONS OF PENALITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminal jurisdiction; German; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Universal jurisdiction; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03976751809362463,"score_gpt":0.31766872520294265,"score_spread":0.27790120710931804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122179429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12770237,0.020861696,0.024908846,0.016230825,0.0002792045,0.00002275516,0.00008725299,0.000028932494,0.8098781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369216,0.0020077361,0.001188002,0.00042414648,0.00011060407,0.000022691289,0.000024964775,0.000013899921,0.0025156534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958241,0.002517057,0.000101930695,0.00040015392,0.0005564434,0.00060038577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773043,0.0013420098,0.0002813016,0.00020766679,0.0002635225,0.00017509575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036580958,0.0003496122,0.00044393327,0.0050616907,0.0060529616,0.007683287,0.0010471197,0.0020371897,0.0035154833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004400328,0.00022959338,0.0004095294,0.0027277365,0.048950106,0.010374412,0.005267617,0.0032363907,0.00015644604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013007033,0.0000013704195,0.00007291971,0.0000054777947,9.410737e-7,0.000012698548,0.0013014455,0.000043656986,0.000009873751,0.9979358,0.00009999581,0.00051454216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008200002,0.000021892214,0.0027433939,0.00022329803,0.000013022852,0.00023713641,0.011672257,0.0004826182,0.00012527569,0.9185011,0.06595487,0.000016833048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006579211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061781546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007683287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007377528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018820227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05352801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122274319","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.579","title":"GIVING VOICE TO REALITY: MICHAEL TREBILCOCK AND PENSION GOVERNANCE ISSUES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Moral hazard; Pension; Liability; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Commission; Business; Private pension; Economics; Actuarial science; Law; Finance; Sociology; Political science; Incentive; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.014998732713589107,"score_gpt":0.2777613802792982,"score_spread":0.2627626475657091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122274319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019542964,0.01514112,0.0036912803,0.7636872,0.000797155,0.000020786969,0.000022942839,0.000034135443,0.19706242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86694586,0.007735906,0.0013964435,0.08478303,0.0021835375,0.0000637957,0.000014586715,0.000043704076,0.036833134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914308,0.004712555,0.0001757989,0.00088310445,0.0017207628,0.0010769572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938835,0.0038979107,0.00056332676,0.00027574948,0.0005343082,0.00084514165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008311419,0.0003062381,0.00046768208,0.00080990634,0.013171752,0.011983282,0.0016597465,0.012654864,0.0038235714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127579495,0.00048378567,0.0003424989,0.0013460994,0.0400412,0.010982125,0.004644191,0.0095409155,0.00055664114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069534035,0.000009063863,0.00021176512,0.000022302984,0.000002746137,0.00021239919,0.0128239235,0.00018403034,0.000032579555,0.9555441,0.026608232,0.004341843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016811697,0.000018086012,0.0007010488,0.00020207147,0.000007042025,0.00033089204,0.013883045,0.00041426404,0.00014091196,0.701491,0.28276002,0.000034845576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03592284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02772441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01218373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076189963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08839953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122295073","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.983","title":"IF PHILOSOPHICAL LEGAL ETHICS IS THE ANSWER, WHAT IS THE QUESTION?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Legal ethics; Law; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Principle of legality; Political science; Sociology; Meta-ethics; Normative ethics; Immorality; Information ethics; Legal profession; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03466443420024338,"score_gpt":0.35657622478657486,"score_spread":0.32191179058633146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122295073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059876754,0.008401724,0.0032398393,0.97572905,0.002431175,0.000006919775,0.000033304812,0.000025638294,0.009533699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16594507,0.05735896,0.01981752,0.6828704,0.047026828,0.00032408015,0.00025393566,0.00044891375,0.025954278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98455137,0.008715767,0.00047206855,0.001246755,0.0036069034,0.001407148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451415,0.035007358,0.0032206995,0.0029184606,0.008013313,0.005698728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029900488,0.0009805976,0.0022982452,0.0027476298,0.007827849,0.015475899,0.0033111495,0.021100152,0.019648168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063248344,0.0006821358,0.0013230345,0.0027458838,0.061110985,0.044266623,0.0070731123,0.025510924,0.009051225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021084872,0.000085199965,0.00055917806,0.00032045244,0.000034268414,0.000079845624,0.0014520729,0.0001952007,0.000109447974,0.8941212,0.0871292,0.015892848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014173603,0.000008633427,0.00019419625,0.0004235403,0.000004881706,0.000068845104,0.0030807983,0.00016942008,0.000037922106,0.90551484,0.09046684,0.000015828922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004454047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038078483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029900488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008538783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0141533045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15813082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122401549","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0004","title":"From author’s right to property right","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Chicago; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Property rights; Statute; Property (philosophy); Exclusive right; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Right to property; Sociology; Intellectual property; Philosophy; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0151646453969118,"score_gpt":0.24738780700671692,"score_spread":0.2322231616098051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122401549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011520211,0.00523206,0.005120231,0.054929662,0.0017778706,0.000043407155,0.00011422256,0.00007058523,0.92119175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68140197,0.005734549,0.0049168244,0.04280771,0.004355203,0.00021899177,0.000191476,0.00023655026,0.26013675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894996,0.0028068935,0.0005813966,0.0020550955,0.004047207,0.0010096965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986426,0.0077386326,0.0007071238,0.0018027787,0.0026916456,0.00063391274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006395686,0.00043564866,0.00046743205,0.0018239678,0.006411942,0.011910043,0.0015600511,0.008052669,0.013714353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024353564,0.00035058396,0.0005124911,0.0013634689,0.03009603,0.014454772,0.005298604,0.011669805,0.0036061688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004986229,0.000005553084,0.000121153476,0.00001713058,0.0000016303555,0.00005526155,0.0021185826,0.000026509393,0.000047597423,0.9886016,0.006503508,0.002496543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018090946,0.000031944495,0.0004005024,0.00035931973,0.000009082205,0.00022221208,0.0017375692,0.00015251686,0.00042565045,0.51171166,0.48490617,0.000025301933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007757008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065021226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013714353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076089473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008570145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055207074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122428845","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0008","title":"Animals accurs’d: &lt;i&gt;Ferae naturae&lt;/i&gt; and the law of property in nineteenth-century North America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Order (exchange); Settlement (finance); Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.005647770035188382,"score_gpt":0.18091042586277323,"score_spread":0.17526265582758485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122428845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055032536,0.029036129,0.0018322433,0.21017978,0.0019762383,0.000020916994,0.0002596239,0.00006156454,0.7016009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73168856,0.0074244537,0.0008977967,0.012516532,0.00049940305,0.000015942429,0.000082220766,0.00003491341,0.24684016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947745,0.000121534504,0.000011053159,0.00006472519,0.00014804825,0.00017710896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994912,0.00016396145,0.00006384078,0.000032939668,0.00016221346,0.000085884385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006433658,0.00019551412,0.00013540879,0.0007340127,0.009280343,0.0041214763,0.00042485545,0.0018513942,0.008353684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001379421,0.00014689067,0.00013754022,0.0008101283,0.01323316,0.001983992,0.00097519805,0.0018338793,0.0005974578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014062438,0.000010203174,0.0022255962,0.00005050786,0.0000032057796,0.00021792496,0.024013516,0.000093671966,0.00020102493,0.8044193,0.15502292,0.013728071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038935727,0.000006131909,0.008662942,0.00014924517,0.0000047867748,0.00009964671,0.012495579,0.000110409994,0.00028195363,0.026341619,0.95182836,0.00001551776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74087065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86616206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25912935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02552098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009787328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5213108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122505542","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0004","title":"The Reasonable Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Frank Iacobucci's Career on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Voting; Political science","score_opus":0.025530191102306383,"score_gpt":0.2686493321745971,"score_spread":0.24311914107229068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122505542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694118,0.000981382,0.00009628808,0.004790353,0.00006146167,0.000101590165,0.00072666875,0.000008545629,0.02382185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99094045,0.00060967,0.0000831896,0.00062855345,0.000026195625,0.000027492655,0.00044480333,0.000016490518,0.007223097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002504,0.0014094508,0.00024188953,0.00095800235,0.003301967,0.0040635327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575116,0.0099449,0.0057046106,0.00076917995,0.015308061,0.010761577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005126272,0.0003573515,0.0010439616,0.0059310133,0.030878637,0.009704512,0.0044356724,0.0028254823,0.00885784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034597363,0.0004926637,0.00041915412,0.011508795,0.009073059,0.0028969888,0.0048760213,0.005913807,0.00077169464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023351987,0.0007469023,0.5829013,0.0001494165,0.000071684946,0.0011176328,0.34542692,0.0004097139,0.00028469332,0.021739388,0.02744224,0.019476606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019548439,0.00007218951,0.51109016,0.00037193534,0.000028700493,0.00013498281,0.46033,0.00088131387,0.00010881346,0.0007140184,0.026166426,0.00008183795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09728983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09728983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7058904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122585759","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.347","title":"Contracts to the Detriment of a Third Party: Developing a Model Inspired by Jewish Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Harm; Law; Judaism; Political science; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Israeli law; Common law; Business; Sociology; Municipal law; Chinese law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028397188368254146,"score_gpt":0.2643624809128136,"score_spread":0.23596529254455947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122585759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09715677,0.0026031518,0.19391946,0.028867763,0.0003317132,0.00012572524,0.00010150913,0.00008429444,0.67680967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404107,0.0010605757,0.028381342,0.0012998567,0.00019000618,0.00010565558,0.000025467754,0.00003745242,0.028488973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986125,0.000761777,0.000028321983,0.00011290063,0.0002466529,0.0002378149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985751,0.000682764,0.00014562084,0.0001854274,0.00023224403,0.00017883914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038065098,0.00035784426,0.00039853872,0.0012615373,0.005014382,0.005335469,0.001959189,0.0038159601,0.005179762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028910558,0.0003163455,0.000880707,0.0009259785,0.013955579,0.0054218853,0.0029284398,0.0025542304,0.00061509246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020439861,0.0000055532223,0.00006799167,0.0000025059546,9.983602e-7,0.00004851755,0.00051899534,0.00042442486,0.000022442366,0.9981919,0.00021622633,0.00049841596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028777766,0.000032083903,0.00030034658,0.000061389466,0.000013894086,0.00023860304,0.0011392545,0.019327097,0.00011380732,0.948893,0.029834002,0.000017765671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01439691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016267492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01439691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006496525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043258728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04713577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122591002","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0011","title":"Democracy, Community, and Federalism in Electoral Apportionment Cases: The United States, Canada, and Australia in Comparative Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Democracy; Federalism; Individualism; Jurisprudence; Apportionment; Political science; Legislature; Separation of powers; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06483907648198886,"score_gpt":0.29210837386029515,"score_spread":0.22726929737830628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122591002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71422815,0.011437151,0.0006265162,0.011565188,0.00017195413,0.00014893201,0.00016959169,0.000022828184,0.26162964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98314464,0.0034704562,0.00045540824,0.0019182137,0.000026753643,0.000076778175,0.000084544554,0.000012095483,0.010811073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944872,0.0015436158,0.00014533095,0.0002465448,0.001384203,0.002193118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929871,0.002727929,0.00038281432,0.00022352285,0.0026231385,0.0010554834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004258779,0.00024646492,0.0007119054,0.0067724674,0.02672905,0.007929141,0.0019077619,0.0027188265,0.0026135535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014675061,0.0003782782,0.00042405876,0.011881331,0.0116209,0.0022917783,0.0046562348,0.0034930892,0.0001284671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001251149,0.00019799836,0.03696785,0.00035335185,0.000068964924,0.0029009038,0.13764344,0.0017537193,0.00040833565,0.7545046,0.022388449,0.042687334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096138545,0.00010940464,0.3045349,0.0014345135,0.00020844379,0.0012124139,0.34523743,0.00449987,0.0008321205,0.037621766,0.30397275,0.00024025264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98926675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8934802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10651983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08160237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7728591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122742871","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.355","title":"ARGUMENTS OF VIRTUE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Constitutional interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02032845432850052,"score_gpt":0.23900120557065604,"score_spread":0.21867275124215552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122742871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045127027,0.011520425,0.048432093,0.11881685,0.0006824561,0.0000522312,0.00007665278,0.000054692846,0.7752375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97387886,0.002081715,0.005374621,0.0058291964,0.00039504014,0.00007776434,0.000018806792,0.00002778128,0.01231606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142843,0.005263889,0.0002175642,0.000708682,0.0014177244,0.0009635731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926214,0.005409998,0.0005615217,0.00068092736,0.00044561565,0.00028052327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010618689,0.00032784423,0.00060673547,0.0017773551,0.006246289,0.0070593716,0.0011695805,0.0058892616,0.0031012916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01432123,0.0002941343,0.00063614635,0.0014718411,0.06435675,0.0072912443,0.0042702653,0.007480591,0.0003476254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013107245,0.0000010778733,0.000017548527,0.0000026649345,6.032096e-7,0.000004795629,0.00011834851,0.000030543157,0.0000057797356,0.99926406,0.00027321023,0.0002801134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006653465,0.0000031654768,0.00009393549,0.000024456534,0.0000016796528,0.000012290472,0.00019566582,0.0001244614,0.00004841946,0.98436433,0.015121355,0.0000035580094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052892053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057796077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010618689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006722295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004791191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05615765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122872171","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0009","title":"Law-Making in Small Jurisdictions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Simple (philosophy); Faith; Legal culture; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0167603221118748,"score_gpt":0.1801361238520556,"score_spread":0.1633758017401808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122872171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06710967,0.00778944,0.028319227,0.032667767,0.000504606,0.00016855133,0.00024044783,0.00013911806,0.86306113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95277613,0.0017528761,0.003538114,0.001304898,0.0002817804,0.00009002696,0.00007975148,0.00002004603,0.040156316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606943,0.0017564204,0.00021912614,0.000761751,0.0007380613,0.00045525222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464357,0.0031962348,0.0005406581,0.0005636839,0.00064594974,0.00040989602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040364154,0.000184368,0.0004238397,0.0011888354,0.0055919,0.008670008,0.001871474,0.002774924,0.01785378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075217327,0.0002616574,0.00046846535,0.0020333864,0.019574212,0.004895407,0.004409594,0.0028172627,0.0009935815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000421223,0.000006406844,0.00023125428,0.000020191284,0.0000024379076,0.00008442066,0.0013890411,0.00037809176,0.00005257348,0.99281377,0.0019510806,0.003066552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011138248,0.000024268615,0.0013320381,0.00024734848,0.000011605074,0.00008612131,0.0023502118,0.001630005,0.0002435497,0.8123208,0.18172352,0.000019344736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014962229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014803263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01785378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070958915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007690292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059726775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122972675","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0007","title":"The Vertical Restraints Paradox: Justifying the Different Legal Treatment of Price and Non-Price Vertical Restraints","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031081620689989327,"score_gpt":0.20533742162380983,"score_spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122972675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09965426,0.005883127,0.1683787,0.116507374,0.0015208668,0.00012794866,0.00029910737,0.0002512087,0.6073775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491246,0.0018408427,0.014563633,0.0134080835,0.0013519876,0.00018565594,0.00009400728,0.00013376147,0.019297507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914056,0.0022203824,0.0005010965,0.0011831326,0.0037002438,0.0009895832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98867875,0.0063761636,0.0013097427,0.0017649079,0.0014379681,0.0004323748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077070817,0.0005881562,0.00094138726,0.0018555411,0.0034180295,0.007548967,0.0039044172,0.011462274,0.004938011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020138977,0.00059321465,0.001760309,0.001350666,0.02416508,0.01179525,0.0055586374,0.0134921195,0.00092721847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026043374,0.0000038931876,0.000040568648,0.000006703681,0.000001660178,0.000031942276,0.00008193505,0.00009835592,0.000041760777,0.99870145,0.00044692442,0.00054208183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024578081,0.000008962248,0.00017583474,0.000056492747,0.000005975795,0.00005357463,0.00013553275,0.0017915278,0.00014740226,0.9892687,0.008317489,0.000013985949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061126826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011462274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048310603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040759385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123075200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.137","title":"STRUCTURAL JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE OBJECTION FROM DEMOCRACY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Enforcement; Democracy; Legislation; Federalism; Politics; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009126243226453234,"score_gpt":0.2355373833031734,"score_spread":0.22641114007672017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123075200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05090512,0.011086776,0.05745545,0.51315564,0.0021933203,0.00033934932,0.00011814429,0.00021705539,0.3645291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8949586,0.0031590897,0.0121072,0.06720182,0.0046620513,0.0005033592,0.000056309214,0.000115952265,0.017235696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89702237,0.055218592,0.00450463,0.0113864,0.024933318,0.0069346325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82871294,0.1284852,0.011499494,0.01537861,0.013797406,0.0021262513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077561446,0.00040087715,0.0013705121,0.0020277924,0.007853076,0.011595924,0.0032682787,0.018823113,0.0034122472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16479191,0.0007850489,0.0015012559,0.0015523997,0.04126815,0.01064385,0.0076306034,0.016352933,0.00076876755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007785249,0.00000844202,0.00018679145,0.000030140778,0.000008699149,0.000037577473,0.0008155577,0.00014361873,0.000064240136,0.99191356,0.0031678553,0.003615778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012906422,0.00004933104,0.0006663385,0.00014864939,0.000024999372,0.00014847114,0.0004021886,0.00084766996,0.0004419563,0.94482267,0.05228771,0.000031006686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041671186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003805488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077561446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00868778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015316857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41018903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123233902","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0020","title":"Property and Collective Undertaking: The Principle of Numerus Clausus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private property; Property rights; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Converse; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.07993937749254479,"score_gpt":0.2821336073769927,"score_spread":0.20219422988444793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123233902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039667524,0.0025613506,0.2218692,0.031316247,0.00060772407,0.0001157572,0.00009082153,0.00015893075,0.70361257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528983,0.00061230385,0.023323653,0.002496255,0.00048192928,0.00023455657,0.000042306216,0.00009928247,0.01981135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916933,0.0037922894,0.00037185405,0.0015985162,0.0016900789,0.00085399655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941678,0.0030918063,0.0005096061,0.0012379893,0.0005802256,0.00041257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008910954,0.00043646086,0.0008374582,0.0018091154,0.006445274,0.0079561705,0.0015318524,0.0048447405,0.0054085464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010989461,0.00043286517,0.0010684625,0.0010184767,0.07335182,0.013415229,0.00798416,0.004991175,0.0010177599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023181783,0.0000016383052,0.00003339525,0.0000044278004,7.224458e-7,0.000007507789,0.00026261187,0.00004737644,0.000016939746,0.9989303,0.00015995698,0.00053274893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061499486,0.000005661326,0.00006594355,0.00001957378,0.0000015038434,0.000028720879,0.00013734934,0.0002613003,0.00005188626,0.9888763,0.010540937,0.0000046914124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030014594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025082154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008910954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004895293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039305394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047126174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123294711","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0021","title":"Electoral fairness and the law of democracy: A structural rights approach to judicial review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015573670904401118,"score_gpt":0.25021697575501783,"score_spread":0.2346433048506167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123294711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025619386,0.020114785,0.343796,0.16461672,0.001502799,0.0008081596,0.0002568086,0.00028365295,0.44300163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9078582,0.0057955957,0.043868,0.009609838,0.0028656889,0.00060887117,0.000082391925,0.00010115224,0.029210206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94319844,0.030583913,0.002346734,0.005152891,0.013798823,0.004919198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448429,0.03966188,0.0025669886,0.0042288913,0.007542159,0.0011570709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06293812,0.000473515,0.001015597,0.0038392304,0.007765135,0.015200643,0.0030423168,0.009154584,0.0049083116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06941228,0.00076248427,0.0010747423,0.0027482938,0.029499846,0.010864758,0.004332631,0.009219274,0.0006407996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003353183,0.000005829023,0.000102484424,0.00001960278,0.0000045225793,0.000016002085,0.00038237186,0.0003831691,0.000045427074,0.9936051,0.0013788196,0.0040533952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003142663,0.000026525806,0.0003060826,0.000110908855,0.000013261582,0.00003510973,0.0001955455,0.0019074172,0.00021150749,0.95695454,0.040178366,0.000029297225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028348157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03826684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06293812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02286388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032499883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33285254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123302563","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.073","title":"CHARITIES AND TERRORIST FINANCING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legitimacy; Transparency (behavior); Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Militant; Political science; Finance; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.023341868083039504,"score_gpt":0.22370790941972915,"score_spread":0.20036604133668964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123302563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42566332,0.011180865,0.0016327925,0.08112039,0.0003425443,0.0002952542,0.0015134398,0.000064522086,0.47818696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684352,0.005139841,0.00053280033,0.002079931,0.000048054255,0.000024992874,0.00023995961,0.00000940006,0.023489783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953057,0.0006016415,0.00007442205,0.00011824281,0.0016166879,0.0022833156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893783,0.0014369026,0.0015216019,0.00015169574,0.004979985,0.0025314882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013606611,0.00019482631,0.00015315558,0.0027595756,0.0102005685,0.0054473164,0.0010420235,0.0010141366,0.005264951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009324365,0.00016279244,0.00023665355,0.0044620717,0.004842442,0.0008889168,0.002178327,0.0016441115,0.00018624566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063669715,0.000107122985,0.17264953,0.0003661208,0.000048743204,0.0012710697,0.015940579,0.002899934,0.0001653197,0.65769684,0.07610239,0.072688706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004162928,0.00006602825,0.37269545,0.0021389718,0.0000909745,0.00052165665,0.06094491,0.0019970578,0.00053181255,0.020741656,0.54008263,0.00014730527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98733264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99336267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98733264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09946759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19989803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72169125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123575200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0077","title":"Criminal law and the constitution of civil order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Polity; Politics; Comparative law; Constitution; Morality; Private law; Jurisdiction; Sociology","score_opus":0.02207173704490226,"score_gpt":0.20137159426822976,"score_spread":0.1792998572233275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123575200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031294614,0.0046567,0.011185985,0.06108283,0.00036670975,0.000038255315,0.000062319945,0.000057967485,0.89125454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594604,0.0017773875,0.0025782795,0.004187378,0.00034739458,0.00007402504,0.00004683748,0.00003375176,0.031494483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968129,0.0011872498,0.00009483104,0.00047437072,0.000641025,0.0007895683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973525,0.001193453,0.00031372835,0.00040543708,0.00031815717,0.00041676481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033704,0.0002754353,0.00038475727,0.0012785608,0.008511979,0.010178671,0.00091246894,0.004833982,0.006003186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061413185,0.00034565796,0.00038310292,0.0009817259,0.059478138,0.0053461306,0.0038742812,0.0052708634,0.0007228088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.8943474e-7,0.0000011585191,0.000025361993,0.0000016639772,3.3125497e-7,0.0000069566318,0.0002712577,0.000041815016,0.0000061600667,0.99888235,0.00044243026,0.00032008823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066526313,0.00000306594,0.00021563315,0.000025558653,0.000001494542,0.000019957673,0.0003276144,0.00017071642,0.000043007523,0.96758366,0.031597868,0.0000046430096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03560795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036243126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03560795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013274831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010991311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0963161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123793227","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2037","title":"How tort law empowers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Delict; Redress; Political science; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Scrutiny; Sociology; Law and economics; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.011350819186203726,"score_gpt":0.2362524998717011,"score_spread":0.22490168068549737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123793227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044007238,0.0037069877,0.026295535,0.07074319,0.0005482629,0.00005042078,0.00012238066,0.00020858212,0.8543174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94000065,0.0019968685,0.0029000023,0.008325001,0.00073419756,0.00005797574,0.00007266892,0.000106477615,0.045806248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98989934,0.003925979,0.00033647678,0.0018130568,0.0023566964,0.0016684919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99169123,0.003941668,0.0007060699,0.0018904171,0.0009182272,0.0008523728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00921182,0.00048911944,0.0006810815,0.002119142,0.007029147,0.010953696,0.0010577353,0.0052241464,0.014895422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013230483,0.0007264979,0.0006771,0.0009971875,0.059714604,0.015974218,0.011046408,0.0061372304,0.0020921852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018295042,0.000006669456,0.00016072439,0.000008385228,0.0000020631435,0.000022869446,0.0025012465,0.00005110463,0.00004085615,0.99400073,0.0015181674,0.0016853027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011769457,0.00001462806,0.0005054074,0.000098922035,0.000011543796,0.00015875998,0.0022759303,0.00015290662,0.00014678853,0.8625091,0.13410011,0.000014187308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009427588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010016908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014895422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060590925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008368712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04983008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123918208","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.213","title":"FORMALISM IN MUSIC AND LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Epistemology; Law; Theoretical physics; Philosophy; Political science; Physics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.022847260544907672,"score_gpt":0.21664331691128785,"score_spread":0.19379605636638017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123918208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035911366,0.035298936,0.16485226,0.105110966,0.00183036,0.00006886507,0.00015009916,0.00049423845,0.6562829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94005245,0.008406652,0.019781956,0.004272083,0.0010432482,0.000086397835,0.00005797451,0.00013280625,0.026166465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960747,0.0023487336,0.00017493559,0.00040182364,0.0006992157,0.00030063672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960646,0.00239575,0.00032884724,0.00059716863,0.0003366408,0.0002771184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056905947,0.00043721835,0.0005601723,0.0013982793,0.005785765,0.009405883,0.0011682243,0.0036800103,0.0033113935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00987604,0.00036444984,0.00060527213,0.0013546622,0.051425558,0.008925183,0.00409033,0.0035542955,0.00057500944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010536592,0.0000010446364,0.000026313211,0.0000065038275,6.735552e-7,0.000007653288,0.0006676839,0.00014404122,0.000012346546,0.9975325,0.00047899727,0.0011212503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044161593,0.00000408011,0.00006292441,0.000039419327,0.0000013003297,0.000020030633,0.00033611926,0.00046742216,0.000033031327,0.9728468,0.026178595,0.0000058466617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021764638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012919622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021764638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009821681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070398087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071261644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123947670","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0007","title":"Promoting Consensus in Society through Deferred-Implementation Agreements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08851777018322296,"score_gpt":0.3615972571401677,"score_spread":0.27307948695694473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123947670","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17528227,0.00040931063,0.6148687,0.01691308,0.00039260928,0.0007542272,0.00005162113,0.00042895754,0.1908993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487187,0.00007700914,0.04374969,0.00059316173,0.00006135853,0.0002866158,0.000013660875,0.000024653726,0.006475069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94215417,0.03641704,0.0027234727,0.0039133662,0.010609543,0.0041823345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8357366,0.11384605,0.008671963,0.022944702,0.013052369,0.0057483437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05401731,0.00064207695,0.0010993833,0.0022219275,0.005098231,0.0062440666,0.004089462,0.006173203,0.008441132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1334644,0.0009160823,0.0011277861,0.0014783026,0.009810151,0.007415456,0.0127224205,0.00737417,0.00074653287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067897396,0.00020399205,0.0010959193,0.00013169838,0.000040495743,0.0001565276,0.0030318603,0.0056517697,0.00090551795,0.9525405,0.0012451882,0.03492874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089881825,0.0001556445,0.0006756316,0.000098107324,0.000040493636,0.000057045792,0.0012035647,0.020967184,0.0009649835,0.9677563,0.007951781,0.000039413306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024803872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050983476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05401731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036226131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011074506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2856742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124106265","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4005","title":"Law in the future","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020695685114375972,"score_gpt":0.2727627974300204,"score_spread":0.25206711231564444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124106265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004546985,0.039523166,0.000817073,0.2547196,0.0023839646,0.00001778607,0.00029040306,0.00006134804,0.69763976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28866786,0.017643379,0.0006798096,0.035245355,0.0024328649,0.000033185013,0.00024360337,0.000096909775,0.654957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982881,0.0004680557,0.000044612316,0.00025734733,0.00047842477,0.00046347306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781644,0.00041219514,0.00011746188,0.00026203252,0.00051973714,0.0008722788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023473506,0.00043344242,0.00040853507,0.0010718512,0.012827981,0.013372458,0.0007444176,0.0059686434,0.040914398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045953337,0.0003158109,0.0003133872,0.0011741767,0.018590352,0.007672908,0.003361222,0.006595137,0.0040190755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008258223,0.000009300186,0.0003118537,0.000024462312,0.000003184381,0.000052121057,0.0027919498,0.00006395769,0.000044681783,0.7865732,0.20242794,0.0076890956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039587667,0.0000049793425,0.00072157715,0.00010679322,0.000003608371,0.000030297953,0.002683618,0.00006469447,0.00003485152,0.07724342,0.9190942,0.000007990724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38442004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.590353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38442004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028195757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026422402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76436496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124226099","doi":"10.2307/3650880","title":"Venture-Capital Exits in Canada and the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Venture capital; Capital (architecture); Business; Political science; Finance; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006414240146212012,"score_gpt":0.15792462023382542,"score_spread":0.15151038008761342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124226099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97405595,0.0008459366,0.00020925923,0.0014212186,0.000026015265,0.000037827813,0.003898985,0.000030812185,0.019474048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900277,0.000405535,0.000091411464,0.000113949725,0.0000053264457,0.0000049115824,0.0013935426,0.0000069931193,0.007950621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858475,0.00005740462,0.000035410376,0.00012295246,0.00037574468,0.00082383386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954833,0.00044718693,0.00082167465,0.00008622585,0.0017349443,0.0014267167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070015376,0.00023889358,0.0005009424,0.002392557,0.004269047,0.003130321,0.0008809579,0.00058235636,0.0037058266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036480126,0.00019516768,0.00033231996,0.00391906,0.0012600512,0.0006127885,0.0016478812,0.001011038,0.00018262153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006997499,0.0001397455,0.8608981,0.00016815968,0.00010186219,0.0019501033,0.009283185,0.004194673,0.00046790473,0.03253658,0.029860895,0.059699006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042847325,0.00004647601,0.9476651,0.0001635338,0.000048111684,0.00020896211,0.016908823,0.0038085382,0.00040555754,0.001021319,0.029604832,0.00007593338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051514696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051514696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049223017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37376708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124279764","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.525","title":"POPULARITY AS A FACTOR IN COPYRIGHT LAW","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Argument (complex analysis); Scope (computer science); Premise; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014954926124756941,"score_gpt":0.20127871215037754,"score_spread":0.1863237860256206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124279764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18761289,0.0027047726,0.07861956,0.02080976,0.00032541092,0.00017678556,0.00010552522,0.00014030066,0.70950496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858,0.0004567709,0.0031613915,0.0005678786,0.00043101434,0.00009696384,0.000019410845,0.0000427735,0.009423812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985946,0.004815831,0.0008732951,0.0024696293,0.0047419393,0.001153407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95669425,0.028882636,0.00442892,0.004751338,0.0037911,0.0014517916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012426388,0.0005074924,0.00088306144,0.0031532613,0.006393317,0.011928553,0.0015921337,0.004221499,0.011293217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044830933,0.0005232577,0.00096685934,0.0028732314,0.039411433,0.024994312,0.008267703,0.005596412,0.0008480977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006940732,0.000010838153,0.00083757786,0.00002159877,0.0000047140356,0.0000349481,0.0007905574,0.00024540603,0.00009331616,0.9940269,0.00029644417,0.003630834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023113982,0.000054679258,0.0025465447,0.00009509604,0.000017526965,0.00014161164,0.0012163103,0.0020142097,0.00036967773,0.97214824,0.021341115,0.000031837943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025534455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017914966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012426388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063262447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00348478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06571782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124331650","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0037","title":"'Necessity knows no law': On extreme cases and uncodifiable necessities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontological ethics; Dignity; Normative; Torture; Context (archaeology); Consequentialism; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Human rights; History","score_opus":0.07944835856887593,"score_gpt":0.25887220525571875,"score_spread":0.1794238466868428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124331650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15117297,0.008845349,0.17808256,0.06991225,0.00060980715,0.00010413951,0.00016775486,0.00011982111,0.5909854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804946,0.0017703763,0.009022278,0.0023885476,0.00040709644,0.00008047456,0.00005013533,0.000043734988,0.0057426915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939493,0.0029838188,0.0002725012,0.00071381184,0.0012926443,0.00078799186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832982,0.012962099,0.00071890885,0.0015514371,0.0009965207,0.0004729227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075182905,0.0004345375,0.00081267674,0.0022154397,0.0051962775,0.0061763697,0.001665419,0.004621163,0.003426509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017735468,0.00056196086,0.00081804383,0.0015515707,0.047198284,0.018070774,0.007110577,0.007050567,0.0003561151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024467631,0.0000023760344,0.00008265465,0.0000051920974,8.669835e-7,0.000065716216,0.00045134642,0.00010669257,0.000013217266,0.9981358,0.00023260171,0.00090099295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002348015,0.0000023137823,0.00009576666,0.00002092631,0.0000014588559,0.000055218363,0.0002585611,0.0003584029,0.00002607453,0.99583024,0.0033448064,0.0000039915412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040664338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037373954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075182905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049673617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002034515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039761007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124412607","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0052","title":"Ideas, interests, institutions and the history of Canadian bankruptcy law, 1867-1880","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislation; Scholarship; Law; Creditor; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Repeal; State (computer science); Sociology; Economics; Law and economics; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.01370690613942484,"score_gpt":0.19978170140996168,"score_spread":0.18607479527053683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124412607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13258119,0.049921688,0.0017811551,0.050649576,0.0005884907,0.00007801139,0.00094853796,0.00007306789,0.76337826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84216976,0.018523024,0.0010251286,0.004499314,0.00016757744,0.000036581536,0.00020603335,0.000048599373,0.133324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972875,0.00024776184,0.000059982045,0.00024091112,0.0009840273,0.0011797926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779534,0.00051795034,0.00016052162,0.000054683842,0.0010789225,0.00039248462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001968729,0.0004890162,0.0002905847,0.0055832253,0.020432,0.00853672,0.0011530789,0.002936042,0.0067883823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053140954,0.00050141127,0.00026248195,0.005972132,0.03346733,0.002609717,0.0019254027,0.0035768459,0.0004719374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002662951,0.00001625887,0.0028421762,0.00007620688,0.000008815195,0.0002964304,0.063578434,0.00046255626,0.00013281821,0.8691024,0.03283539,0.030621855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010690996,0.000010464953,0.014049914,0.0002961789,0.0000151216755,0.00010995217,0.012506714,0.00018166764,0.00017542731,0.017828062,0.9547557,0.00006010265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99655163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28642434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28642434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1500995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8276466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125005679","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0001","title":"Shareholder Isolation and the Regulation of Auditors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Accounting; Corporation; Business; Audit; Auditor's report; Auditor independence; Shareholder resolution; Corporate governance; Finance; Joint audit; Internal audit","score_opus":0.005617768537583901,"score_gpt":0.16837619700195125,"score_spread":0.16275842846436736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125005679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62009865,0.0046443767,0.048326276,0.015167517,0.00026607877,0.00011725048,0.00003931502,0.000120335055,0.3112202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489355,0.00017842925,0.00063598226,0.0006938451,0.00006588486,0.000028745108,0.0000051165293,0.0000075541216,0.003490726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98343337,0.006027445,0.0008961552,0.0025099055,0.004373595,0.0027596473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95590156,0.02047417,0.012220465,0.00530624,0.0031353158,0.0029622316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109110465,0.0002582949,0.00048298418,0.0012648833,0.004442007,0.007164427,0.0014060228,0.002602798,0.002705379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027969342,0.00042699435,0.00037159174,0.0008931418,0.017610816,0.0035745422,0.008825968,0.0035843945,0.00046716837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016018613,0.00008922319,0.013558613,0.00008944351,0.00004875023,0.00034239425,0.010795935,0.0016717163,0.0048203277,0.9262151,0.0012651222,0.040943198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019420577,0.00032697787,0.037521712,0.00051203265,0.00016110975,0.00070618663,0.0055167256,0.0069355583,0.012291127,0.84991086,0.08579588,0.00012770478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038768197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037321725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0109110465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035146652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004603498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057703853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125175680","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.537","title":"LEGAL UNIVERSALISM: PERSISTENT OBJECTIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Rehearsing; Political science; Law; Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.011754322329900426,"score_gpt":0.17276611680309018,"score_spread":0.16101179447318975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125175680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01628051,0.012483206,0.0371054,0.84382033,0.0034937987,0.00009111185,0.00014678415,0.00018881678,0.08639007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7431826,0.006110128,0.014466687,0.21479058,0.013870343,0.00048561257,0.00010709903,0.00024378706,0.006743266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9062406,0.04156815,0.005103883,0.014286111,0.028979292,0.003821892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73976684,0.2122495,0.0102647785,0.020932106,0.013413827,0.0033730352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10654458,0.0006219628,0.0026426015,0.0029235084,0.0066364426,0.009664482,0.0065050274,0.019274883,0.005615407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23367445,0.0009274349,0.0015858767,0.0022597504,0.105790116,0.022754787,0.01197678,0.035356544,0.00071268063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107422065,0.000014128689,0.00013919764,0.00004159105,0.000011997222,0.000019488314,0.00043233705,0.00012092985,0.000019308462,0.9928219,0.0035120174,0.002856416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034368877,0.000011456473,0.00015513007,0.00012223676,0.000011271715,0.000040729017,0.00020904657,0.0002660073,0.00011095425,0.9796687,0.01935676,0.000013352027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036295438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016070596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10654458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012145693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009786972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56346834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125339624","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.397","title":"THE EVIDENTIARY BURDEN FOR OVERTURNING GOVERNMENT'S CHOICE OF REGULATORY INSTRUMENT: THE CASE OF DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Charter; Argument (complex analysis); Consumer protection; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Public relations; Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.10390471592628747,"score_gpt":0.4148161472062495,"score_spread":0.310911431279962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125339624","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069262676,0.018558815,0.009620245,0.56866354,0.0012667439,0.00013693755,0.00011715895,0.00006774796,0.3323063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8493376,0.008285434,0.0044217263,0.11616351,0.0011828368,0.00012923435,0.000032983415,0.000047461974,0.020399373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95349,0.01741793,0.0019280736,0.0040778993,0.015504087,0.00758188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116877,0.07348634,0.0037774546,0.0029967583,0.007008607,0.0010431572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035659295,0.00049196894,0.001112637,0.00209393,0.01769293,0.021940343,0.00377525,0.032626092,0.0021983227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0740776,0.0010559215,0.0014550727,0.002496209,0.054198656,0.010076389,0.0045470935,0.021299455,0.00037824071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011639667,0.000007709442,0.00034425515,0.0000474236,0.000007532081,0.00038222346,0.0033444902,0.00020686003,0.000111178226,0.98737735,0.005316221,0.0028432177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016144358,0.000091435715,0.0050580474,0.0014732517,0.00023184819,0.00095834647,0.012784611,0.002124724,0.001956207,0.61153847,0.36332977,0.0002918623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41063923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40523666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41063923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04906042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052550144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8164981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125346337","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.691","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE BALANCE: MODERN EXCLUSIONARY RULES AND THE TOLERATION OF POLICE LAWLESSNESS IN THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawlessness; Exclusionary rule; Discretion; Law; Political science; Balance (ability); Human rights; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.03770498597795385,"score_gpt":0.2871670229026199,"score_spread":0.24946203692466606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125346337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16923979,0.0089127,0.1323111,0.23342851,0.0010008285,0.00017326143,0.00018690816,0.00016433187,0.45458254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818393,0.0008016836,0.0062783766,0.005964468,0.0006281769,0.00011412518,0.000024540335,0.00004665784,0.004302626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654952,0.016774876,0.0023726951,0.0054229912,0.00691022,0.0030239273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9437723,0.036888365,0.0052095377,0.008175655,0.0038658527,0.002088381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040130507,0.0004016862,0.0011925952,0.0022532318,0.009625935,0.015761243,0.002568111,0.011205598,0.0028731807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063748114,0.000803938,0.00087462313,0.0015476282,0.117264226,0.019322438,0.009825197,0.012247157,0.0004835231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012392709,0.000007263029,0.00019335735,0.000011444496,0.0000050105223,0.000045274133,0.0020851637,0.00012582351,0.000107932865,0.9952113,0.00035953283,0.0018354037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025360468,0.000015389942,0.00024590912,0.00007472042,0.000007896275,0.000048709586,0.00057587546,0.00022434954,0.00016155378,0.9876754,0.010924637,0.000020073918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00793364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054759057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040130507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007374568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009483038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21223295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125353358","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.445","title":"PERSON, PLACE, OR THING? PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURING OF SOCIAL RELATIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Structuring; Property rights; Epistemology; Intuition; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013791017483509402,"score_gpt":0.22701702171855773,"score_spread":0.21322600423504834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125353358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15268315,0.010999898,0.1519124,0.09882338,0.000491227,0.000108156244,0.00016488036,0.0001995768,0.58461726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98363423,0.0011837529,0.006436806,0.0013983866,0.00016283979,0.00005579821,0.00002681725,0.000025292402,0.0070760217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674475,0.001992572,0.000108097614,0.00042080454,0.00036748964,0.00036620672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776185,0.0010844403,0.0003078708,0.00044355768,0.00017157143,0.00023077993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034886207,0.0002421363,0.0004906742,0.0011641907,0.0042707054,0.006198296,0.0010819043,0.0025025583,0.0039812773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038473983,0.0002685297,0.0005159985,0.0012133595,0.055151008,0.012673425,0.004556739,0.002514387,0.00060338096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024782878,0.000002655427,0.0001238496,0.000006480417,0.0000014070664,0.000018896779,0.0017707522,0.00007587536,0.000028011893,0.99607027,0.00027465212,0.0016247786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068562904,0.000007268393,0.0002840129,0.000024210862,0.0000018774199,0.000031830525,0.0015006317,0.00018280363,0.00004779996,0.9793682,0.018539578,0.000004887243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005949879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046644607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006198296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038794444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028415015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028147459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125541929","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0007","title":"A Network Effects Perspective on Software Piracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Business; Intellectual property; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Legislature; Software; Computer security; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.00991715124233946,"score_gpt":0.1909535129673466,"score_spread":0.18103636172500714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125541929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076191515,0.006600079,0.16564728,0.03498852,0.00052951963,0.00015482832,0.00047483758,0.00017459474,0.715239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395623,0.008162866,0.007924268,0.0020593414,0.0010547579,0.00013915841,0.0000886646,0.00007105395,0.040937517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998201,0.0006879714,0.000045059463,0.00027795075,0.0005025872,0.00028536667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99232894,0.0049264277,0.0012550344,0.00054720574,0.0006111217,0.00033127252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023024916,0.0007315801,0.0005491161,0.0029094575,0.002004967,0.0039112624,0.0016077048,0.003478573,0.021467872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006326793,0.00037916907,0.0008895488,0.0015573989,0.0062280884,0.007995555,0.0029563832,0.0026479973,0.0012641113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011949435,0.000025013398,0.00080767344,0.000046078778,0.000012187569,0.00018350955,0.00022243547,0.0033291108,0.00012209668,0.9887975,0.0014922458,0.0049502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021898015,0.000057325735,0.0012125869,0.00011174981,0.00003844882,0.00037519188,0.00034858185,0.013484462,0.00024541919,0.9610333,0.023044847,0.000026258278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040617497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002668321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021467872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038352828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011241442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07181716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125656850","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.373","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND BEYOND","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Tribunal; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Work (physics); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.018811540854771994,"score_gpt":0.2066464900329916,"score_spread":0.1878349491782196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125656850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011790264,0.017716315,0.0057473714,0.076740324,0.00069571816,0.000019857553,0.000073482515,0.000036328365,0.8871804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593934,0.009316233,0.001303842,0.0243872,0.0024061617,0.0000764538,0.0000675948,0.00007960726,0.10296947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943481,0.0019364941,0.00014562081,0.00082183117,0.0014711333,0.0012769183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957898,0.0018795104,0.00025901909,0.00052641385,0.00062904967,0.0009161706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004116262,0.00028639226,0.0005565295,0.001648308,0.009134684,0.0110593345,0.0012259224,0.005563848,0.016987205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008325009,0.00020897413,0.00040967096,0.0012717745,0.030516664,0.010273638,0.010778338,0.0055929953,0.0014009131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031670515,0.000005094599,0.00007278032,0.000008823581,0.0000013977732,0.000023990562,0.0013751995,0.000026541053,0.00001997483,0.9909402,0.0033305155,0.004192392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005313094,0.000014989079,0.00047905283,0.00025130884,0.0000035904625,0.00008817412,0.0014521106,0.00008097195,0.000053692696,0.7239297,0.27363047,0.000010575835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015419122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011596471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016987205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00802817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071967617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0582487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125752786","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.229","title":"Corrective Justice and Unjust Enrichment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Private law; Economic Justice; Tort; Law; Duty; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Restitution; Liability","score_opus":0.01763466405302733,"score_gpt":0.27011748703015,"score_spread":0.25248282297712266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125752786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05740916,0.004201189,0.07361736,0.042687222,0.00053921324,0.00008749143,0.00007068002,0.00013572279,0.8212519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599305,0.000642343,0.0044613155,0.004487775,0.00027794947,0.00006052057,0.000023974351,0.00004953754,0.03006599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952887,0.0015487542,0.00016518752,0.0007027969,0.0013867383,0.00090776663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977028,0.0009336236,0.00028659872,0.0005477734,0.00032020826,0.00020907489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031333936,0.0003767921,0.00049692206,0.0010213066,0.004298414,0.0037240095,0.0007846084,0.004194198,0.0055200746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006282878,0.000258952,0.00050888746,0.0006445794,0.03042776,0.0068304734,0.00523305,0.0046779113,0.00045958662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002295729,0.0000038747876,0.00006328254,0.000006463238,0.0000010927987,0.000021799871,0.00036947947,0.00008576166,0.000041650983,0.9975387,0.00044621914,0.0014194453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049276455,0.0000061596684,0.0002063624,0.000025197789,0.000002704322,0.0000496631,0.00018144572,0.00019955146,0.00013448391,0.980352,0.018832905,0.0000044894023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004862274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048245676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055200746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051535764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046392204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03739202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125754116","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4006","title":"Self-driving laws","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self driving; Computer science; State (computer science); Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.01632854652933821,"score_gpt":0.2709001571330333,"score_spread":0.25457161060369504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125754116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04330331,0.002672997,0.2745741,0.03108182,0.00054725097,0.0005374475,0.00036432652,0.0006219081,0.6462969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7975984,0.001789918,0.10936567,0.007979738,0.00042032383,0.0007279835,0.00025694244,0.0004093894,0.08145168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990062,0.0029344873,0.0005317137,0.0022714182,0.003598553,0.0006018901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841403,0.0052868244,0.0017399456,0.005064456,0.0032159497,0.0005525016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010431665,0.00060681324,0.00052177504,0.0013226181,0.002285485,0.0055154404,0.0020374155,0.0035911344,0.009026796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023924146,0.000640472,0.00095379486,0.00068402075,0.022049867,0.007857915,0.0032557982,0.0042044693,0.0019101823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004450424,0.000015602738,0.00038885316,0.00003285531,0.000009618555,0.000023870034,0.0004611998,0.00082587724,0.00020873046,0.9907198,0.0017630918,0.005546114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018957528,0.000036794732,0.0007037943,0.00011247886,0.000012954272,0.00008089729,0.00022961468,0.0032311196,0.0006961254,0.88776654,0.10708801,0.000022702392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005280643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003931034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010431665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046400726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004820501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05516857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125754435","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.481","title":"AN OBJECT LESSON IN SPECULATION: MULTIPLE VIEWS OF THE CATHEDRAL IN <i>LEAF V. INTERNATIONAL GALLERIES</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Painting; Law; Doctrine; Appeal; Damages; Speculation; Rescission; Verisimilitude; Art; Art history; Political science; Literature; Economics","score_opus":0.03133497533826046,"score_gpt":0.2749085395805675,"score_spread":0.24357356424230703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125754435","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009045987,0.0038638967,0.0034573013,0.8801661,0.0024553924,0.000019916453,0.0000753738,0.000035796187,0.1008803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43394634,0.0029445798,0.0024031668,0.51484513,0.012232619,0.00015224676,0.00007031884,0.00014615912,0.033259455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078476,0.0051329345,0.00027976508,0.0015173525,0.0014160273,0.000869118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98097,0.015652355,0.00073961704,0.0008277549,0.0012228917,0.0005874004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154857235,0.00069374556,0.0008015709,0.0013946327,0.012402285,0.013874441,0.0047925417,0.030711785,0.008884026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032621525,0.00072886713,0.0012567719,0.0013201092,0.03911315,0.026377877,0.0071469904,0.03718571,0.00115202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027579352,0.0000113173555,0.00031126768,0.00003228039,0.000008559946,0.00041536786,0.012112723,0.000079019526,0.00007468493,0.93035877,0.053924218,0.002644151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065385415,0.000031331063,0.0004198287,0.00047772686,0.000026051666,0.0003301267,0.016944563,0.0005662887,0.00030385723,0.72157013,0.259201,0.000063758234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014763494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01506045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030711785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006141767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004901146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08189726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125995196","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2759","title":"The (ir)relevance of constitutional protection for property rights? Compensation for takings in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Statutory law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Property law; Constitutional law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Constraint (computer-aided design); Law; Government (linguistics); Economics; Private property","score_opus":0.02946621708068886,"score_gpt":0.23164383999305554,"score_spread":0.20217762291236668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125995196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39183623,0.010055712,0.0027169313,0.06297225,0.00023671259,0.00006656917,0.0005701823,0.000053428957,0.531492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99236906,0.0011661036,0.00038249523,0.0016663814,0.000021629085,0.000007666381,0.000035996753,0.0000057542425,0.004344788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436635,0.00049867894,0.0001267572,0.00042565315,0.0019756586,0.0026069582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558973,0.0012697042,0.0004447911,0.00019711563,0.0018448109,0.0006537981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026552938,0.00017973865,0.0005423103,0.0021974526,0.0119627435,0.008756494,0.0016610672,0.0025782296,0.004550386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010514912,0.00022174344,0.00050240924,0.0032848122,0.014663351,0.0023523387,0.0018203675,0.003178645,0.00012812273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032582404,0.000012408919,0.005373647,0.00004016106,0.000018470027,0.00013707751,0.002547395,0.0007758827,0.00022725099,0.97776276,0.0036984081,0.0093741305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024322627,0.0001327086,0.26072028,0.0015232495,0.0006280772,0.0007154858,0.045935933,0.009765151,0.0032687595,0.37638342,0.30019045,0.00049320754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99232167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11283164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11283164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11832847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81865466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126045634","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.425","title":"REINVENTING THE NIGHT-WATCHMAN STATE?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Language change; Political science; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.020689580146145886,"score_gpt":0.2874990188203944,"score_spread":0.26680943867424856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126045634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42370576,0.0027664609,0.0020401513,0.14970133,0.0014937286,0.000036070855,0.0000372962,0.000057716086,0.42016152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498698,0.0006370032,0.00027090198,0.0057872203,0.00010457628,0.000007745895,0.0000097833945,0.000018686818,0.04329421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991911,0.00033461378,0.000010892455,0.000062253945,0.00010476425,0.00029641096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995932,0.00007357706,0.000054390017,0.000034128287,0.000049899423,0.00019479652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009141777,0.00007811401,0.000093772,0.0001903556,0.005506294,0.0038627083,0.00036789826,0.0014530795,0.0065351278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017249279,0.00011158923,0.00009283735,0.00022464158,0.007832543,0.0036339369,0.002376501,0.0027474929,0.0005552547],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016990723,0.00003427563,0.003412107,0.00002296566,0.0000018407085,0.00016312378,0.059443343,0.00005200098,0.00028104175,0.9015007,0.01701788,0.018053783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001078471,0.00006211116,0.006533331,0.00016507515,0.0000052467026,0.0002163324,0.13277148,0.00028898867,0.0005482297,0.06048851,0.7988866,0.000023414153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031186903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06493357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031186903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037531948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051179156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062010765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130335609","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0098","title":"Religious institutionalism: a feminist response","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalism; Sociology; Religious controversies; Religious organization; New institutionalism; Normative; Religious freedom; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Religious identity; Religious discrimination; Political science; Economic freedom; Politics; Religiosity; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013370208013375228,"score_gpt":0.260283591813146,"score_spread":0.24691338379977074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130335609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075316824,0.005257318,0.0030866503,0.47780183,0.00066207687,0.000032634496,0.00018943193,0.000044878896,0.4376083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93694663,0.0015273498,0.00046736273,0.032527003,0.00045059333,0.00002503665,0.00003160369,0.000023641958,0.028000811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968142,0.0012375506,0.00003830875,0.00033261217,0.0006378937,0.00093951554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972914,0.0016068999,0.00019648946,0.00013727056,0.00044634918,0.0003215877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003769915,0.00025880415,0.0002735964,0.00092268677,0.012265884,0.00433487,0.0013588618,0.00491615,0.004168908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040055173,0.00021964363,0.000282932,0.000885937,0.05364417,0.0035978155,0.003393405,0.006042743,0.00022490068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062405065,0.000006233767,0.00056304404,0.000013110254,0.0000022164609,0.00015133602,0.029749515,0.000091903275,0.00008079371,0.9525676,0.013998823,0.0027691724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002736285,0.000021900636,0.005763868,0.00025686139,0.000012398512,0.0003540989,0.0888654,0.000462075,0.00051814737,0.17598493,0.72768104,0.00005193998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44014576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.515721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44014576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029432999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013401225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87516767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135184885","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0018","title":"The domain of private law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Reciprocal; Law; Normative; Core (optical fiber); Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Institution; Sociology; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.01659580473579248,"score_gpt":0.24110670887428515,"score_spread":0.22451090413849267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135184885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021282272,0.009799303,0.05270815,0.06986672,0.0004226227,0.000073408286,0.00026138747,0.00010564887,0.84548056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413757,0.00532808,0.0073088566,0.0059391833,0.00093510846,0.00012976173,0.00014531806,0.00008358374,0.03875446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941292,0.0028599084,0.00017781009,0.0010485861,0.0011273411,0.0006571803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909396,0.0048766634,0.00047170906,0.0021844662,0.0007884918,0.00073902897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005822416,0.00037355622,0.00074587687,0.0012869543,0.008338561,0.013360421,0.0013423907,0.0064138807,0.00886982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011143478,0.00047357703,0.00058668765,0.0013656834,0.062152807,0.012694534,0.00711546,0.00768995,0.0012710589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010533594,0.0000016097359,0.000034070457,0.000006223798,7.4644237e-7,0.000011354831,0.00035902107,0.00004391085,0.000010575482,0.9981183,0.0006858919,0.00072726666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054588577,0.000003175693,0.00013527636,0.000053767206,0.0000026224357,0.00004298797,0.0005209808,0.0002753583,0.00004512371,0.95329165,0.045619257,0.0000043576047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022641296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010862944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022641296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011548331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011853757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08378935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150515959","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.191","title":"PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC RIGHT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Private law; Law; Tort; Unjust enrichment; Public law; Public interest; Political science; Economic Justice; Exclusive right; Common law; Commercial law; Liability; Law and economics; Normative; Private rights; Business; Sociology; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.02653600188505005,"score_gpt":0.2331907195830554,"score_spread":0.20665471769800536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150515959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008423177,0.011327604,0.031307414,0.08398916,0.0010569121,0.0000562699,0.00012607424,0.000086985376,0.8636264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79148465,0.0088104615,0.010037624,0.0381079,0.0037576964,0.0002721687,0.00019203557,0.00018219122,0.14715526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992648,0.0029549862,0.00029244655,0.0013988535,0.0014539951,0.001251773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572515,0.0026002512,0.00032276998,0.00068786705,0.00041858424,0.00024550574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006356104,0.0006912381,0.00055473705,0.0012197858,0.008309741,0.0103771435,0.0009818316,0.009853047,0.017526152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065963212,0.00040372467,0.0008964988,0.0012312821,0.045601778,0.015021245,0.0077855624,0.010930618,0.002630793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015576624,0.0000022824797,0.000014296511,0.000004859483,5.9214227e-7,0.0000065550835,0.0001816847,0.000017969058,0.000007990918,0.9982332,0.0007195686,0.0008094564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009026579,0.0000082354745,0.000070601585,0.00004703434,0.0000029759065,0.0000428159,0.00021347441,0.00009311529,0.00006924336,0.9352657,0.06417139,0.000006367482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045822607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027982392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017526152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007680231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058630824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159239982","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0035","title":"Elaborate imaginings: Rethinking environmental obligations in Canadian insolvency law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Debt; Judicial review; Environmental law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.012110517428257386,"score_gpt":0.22055626110435944,"score_spread":0.20844574367610205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159239982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06577087,0.0054688947,0.016486173,0.17431724,0.0009430456,0.00011085659,0.0002033033,0.00010835276,0.7365912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392394,0.0033389374,0.006185105,0.01918352,0.00021525455,0.000051035073,0.00007481094,0.00011247419,0.031599514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99202627,0.0017388489,0.00018246814,0.00084974885,0.0031042309,0.0020985168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929015,0.0035544161,0.00025092042,0.00036402495,0.0022924622,0.0006366758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008370438,0.000664517,0.00056879054,0.00359028,0.034474622,0.020115014,0.0036382366,0.007765608,0.0068152347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013343171,0.0007570343,0.000742174,0.0037526852,0.061231345,0.011212162,0.00816057,0.013607191,0.00035288912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032435173,0.0000044611256,0.00031069454,0.000014008649,0.0000019144986,0.00014456316,0.026372211,0.00024248197,0.00007968855,0.963274,0.0063034473,0.003249264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022133465,0.000012440496,0.0026878268,0.0004399927,0.000037828737,0.00015001046,0.062306743,0.0025303971,0.00039659868,0.4181376,0.51312584,0.00015258943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9780212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1748425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1748425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14553383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9570657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163237934","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0135","title":"The notwithstanding clause: Legislatures, courts, and the electorate","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Law; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Free Exercise Clause; Law and economics; First amendment; Sociology","score_opus":0.010382390662058916,"score_gpt":0.2284526592122968,"score_spread":0.21807026855023787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163237934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08351675,0.005919698,0.021027703,0.042137362,0.00048662428,0.000116350246,0.00024902166,0.000085036765,0.8464614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96276003,0.0012831951,0.0029012659,0.0043703816,0.000142324,0.000060204657,0.00005408912,0.000031349853,0.02839714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943534,0.0015060743,0.00011600603,0.0005109601,0.0015986946,0.0019148382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997373,0.0012702637,0.00025679014,0.00019545533,0.0006164577,0.00028804806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041646915,0.00023488665,0.0003831146,0.0011918922,0.010635237,0.010585396,0.0014083319,0.0035750195,0.0052837017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007002224,0.00039430245,0.0002682968,0.0019800975,0.024411265,0.0040098475,0.001931372,0.003966301,0.0003119314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020001162,0.0000014973978,0.0002193857,0.00000367288,7.033976e-7,0.000010906155,0.0009996614,0.000067004636,0.000028913777,0.9965552,0.00080852705,0.0013024937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004716684,0.00004634737,0.011389693,0.00027785092,0.000050553965,0.00008467496,0.008877839,0.0013898987,0.0006952825,0.6639538,0.31309557,0.00009128345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7005215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8114443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29947847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022527993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043720827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6024843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194464316","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0011","title":"The death of law? Computationally personalized norms and the rule of law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Rule of law; Law; Private law; Personalization; Public law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.02841311351289822,"score_gpt":0.2863250007659639,"score_spread":0.2579118872530657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194464316","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091220744,0.00308826,0.44907987,0.1749001,0.0010881992,0.00014442079,0.0006449974,0.000771832,0.27906162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9309332,0.0009288583,0.052110568,0.0053427154,0.0004955633,0.000118824704,0.00017757114,0.00022373362,0.009668847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919384,0.0034959875,0.00037137303,0.0019087908,0.0016665974,0.0006187452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762542,0.012485146,0.0015357409,0.007094564,0.0016043364,0.0010260148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010901228,0.0002982441,0.00086087856,0.0009777066,0.0031066134,0.010001528,0.0018731795,0.004031446,0.004346332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034869723,0.0004995872,0.00076573435,0.00087357283,0.036418222,0.019977001,0.0037974184,0.0072779795,0.00081583386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007631189,0.000007004002,0.00021612445,0.000012935143,0.0000048492543,0.00002183404,0.0005194559,0.0008515415,0.000047216028,0.9932473,0.0013889996,0.0036751635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054965276,0.000003094868,0.00008713648,0.000014941539,0.0000028513,0.000018545139,0.00015758198,0.0018793195,0.00010207018,0.98932195,0.008400326,0.0000067051483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009208944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006134274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010901228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050923117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047508553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057651877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197035081","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0132","title":"When, and how, does property matter?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Law and economics; Nothing; Property law; Property rights; Law; Private property; Intangible property; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Restitution; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.012809334355310438,"score_gpt":0.2137237181715257,"score_spread":0.20091438381621526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197035081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076086804,0.014388382,0.033894915,0.371076,0.0012928633,0.00009199315,0.00036844384,0.000093174065,0.5027075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564932,0.0036298116,0.0026660638,0.018628165,0.00076236826,0.00006140973,0.000099052224,0.00007619269,0.017583705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98822093,0.0056251357,0.000423799,0.0018045087,0.0022322258,0.0016935624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98495144,0.009110774,0.0011721337,0.0015126838,0.0019519192,0.0013010188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012558236,0.00035566336,0.000994476,0.0011839399,0.007599091,0.010967039,0.0018559508,0.006655192,0.0072989897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018212069,0.00029307455,0.0005534861,0.0015929851,0.07731682,0.018631773,0.004568186,0.0051622917,0.0011025165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047725885,0.0000053400213,0.00044451441,0.000025492001,0.000004762817,0.000041528303,0.0016295211,0.000059624446,0.000041811963,0.99360126,0.0018999404,0.002241407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008442932,0.000012628734,0.0010808338,0.0001449651,0.000013541265,0.000058451336,0.0046350695,0.00016409867,0.00014127018,0.93968856,0.054037623,0.000014473917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037987832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02656974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037987832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137569215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012472173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09981394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199404808","doi":"","title":"Are M&A Lawyers Better at Contract Drafting?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.025655701782349168,"score_gpt":0.26936531552930976,"score_spread":0.2437096137469606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199404808","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10471376,0.010111657,0.0014871516,0.7773978,0.0017495068,0.000080424405,0.0004092117,0.00013394133,0.1039166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982999,0.0052490085,0.0016101605,0.0703383,0.0017727716,0.00004985041,0.00022804044,0.00011959198,0.02233225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667165,0.014440522,0.0017780837,0.0020470333,0.0069567044,0.008061212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.761278,0.10480009,0.03875468,0.01087386,0.039891552,0.044401802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038024154,0.0002982566,0.0012364491,0.003660744,0.008513805,0.016657313,0.0021527524,0.011414497,0.063257754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22273982,0.00088892103,0.0007221819,0.004417141,0.010922802,0.016260473,0.0022911942,0.0070502735,0.006877326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000977583,0.0011051388,0.16290525,0.0006743904,0.00022636574,0.0007625737,0.02111759,0.0010571921,0.0009818865,0.079634145,0.474469,0.2560889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008091194,0.00077838526,0.37866127,0.001701702,0.00043149947,0.0012830901,0.099482164,0.002877046,0.001914855,0.13222344,0.37945262,0.00038476827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12658866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1949953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12658866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017294243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03386464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25170362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199535267","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0048","title":"Popular sovereignty and constitutional democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Popular sovereignty; Democracy; State (computer science); Rhetoric; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014590500417542323,"score_gpt":0.2518528578356401,"score_spread":0.23726235741809779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199535267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08373675,0.010711791,0.02244029,0.05668263,0.000534726,0.000034672772,0.00008572505,0.00006439151,0.82570904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97625095,0.0013619554,0.0008401061,0.0019464582,0.00039360658,0.000025295698,0.00003337036,0.00001917121,0.01912907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626833,0.0016839689,0.00014726022,0.00062539865,0.00062285824,0.0006522881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639964,0.0018350944,0.00041450222,0.00058336416,0.0004283779,0.00033905957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004245857,0.00017628667,0.00040940332,0.0008190212,0.0053961817,0.006741167,0.0005453447,0.0022393996,0.0061614537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069261477,0.00021283906,0.00032598234,0.0012546136,0.03643784,0.006733136,0.005641941,0.0045112404,0.0004345031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015739752,0.0000013984813,0.0000720936,0.000005121759,8.2757066e-7,0.000009826337,0.0006688926,0.000035755485,0.000015434425,0.99790215,0.00032978144,0.0009570325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001477396,0.000016723458,0.0005236843,0.000056855497,0.0000047650265,0.000057322628,0.001029555,0.00025510386,0.00012208783,0.91414565,0.083765924,0.00000768659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073756916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006001146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073756916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005031504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004268194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036506355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199818095","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0007","title":"Farewell to the F-word? Fragmentation of international law in times of the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); International law; Political science; Scholarship; Law; Dialectic; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0191897909301938,"score_gpt":0.2843033732650755,"score_spread":0.2651135823348817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199818095","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12177925,0.019975316,0.0050352155,0.67226326,0.0031573465,0.00003832771,0.000089759335,0.000062261875,0.17759925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242256,0.006075655,0.0010650123,0.057930786,0.0014959165,0.00005027256,0.000057552144,0.00012091568,0.008978355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494994,0.0023686902,0.00014746281,0.00049257785,0.00079451315,0.0012467623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921875,0.0037760907,0.0011867087,0.0008325355,0.00065040844,0.0013667182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007545577,0.0002776299,0.0006204211,0.0016058886,0.013644245,0.018913094,0.0016601415,0.009535654,0.0075123804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022224749,0.0003900922,0.00040049996,0.0019591136,0.049681447,0.031048106,0.009580171,0.013284865,0.00084773096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035248133,0.000021547286,0.001154551,0.00007222887,0.00000778117,0.00060270366,0.114238895,0.00014851119,0.000112286485,0.8351757,0.03352121,0.0149094295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021774125,0.000040285406,0.0025070868,0.0010547361,0.000009141639,0.00068330864,0.19907723,0.00038130526,0.000179214,0.513602,0.28237438,0.000069636546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014586745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015630152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018913094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012164737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077757966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08826178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200467662","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0023","title":"Combatting corruption and collusion in public procurement: Lessons from Operation Car Wash","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social; Governo Brasil","keywords":"Collusion; Procurement; Language change; Incentive; Competition (biology); Enforcement; Law enforcement; Business; Economics; Public economics; Industrial organization; Market economy; Law; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.039380567322648344,"score_gpt":0.26540796231657143,"score_spread":0.2260273949939231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200467662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6473686,0.00739471,0.040494215,0.07094618,0.00015837986,0.00017474298,0.000055916717,0.00011205297,0.2332953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877971,0.002465687,0.0032532362,0.0011661518,0.000028307819,0.000026460277,0.00001530393,0.000022365879,0.0052254703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649256,0.0023436083,0.000059347876,0.00012033561,0.00040078678,0.000583247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910047,0.0059059723,0.00087797677,0.00051845826,0.001100335,0.00059251336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059943977,0.0004092332,0.0005110879,0.0005653024,0.0033865343,0.00397304,0.00088607584,0.0014994394,0.0037187217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008866468,0.0002867518,0.00048179875,0.0010260063,0.005092616,0.0044960915,0.0042091035,0.002549394,0.0003260694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038145663,0.0009531056,0.042055897,0.0008841007,0.00016602843,0.004369341,0.026489673,0.037969843,0.002014724,0.72249824,0.009176257,0.15304135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035638525,0.0013229612,0.03299066,0.0023687072,0.00028251094,0.0011728781,0.09325134,0.05795219,0.0060988218,0.56417423,0.23978087,0.00024841423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028334344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04921458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028334344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004589585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008722027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056338847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200710296","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0014","title":"Corruption and the criminal law: Assurance and deterrence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Criminal justice; Deterrence (psychology); Language change; Criminal law; Law and economics; Compliance (psychology); Cheating; Psychological intervention; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.018395647837976866,"score_gpt":0.23760055582198655,"score_spread":0.21920490798400968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200710296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41970518,0.010645009,0.040732287,0.084851,0.00022758133,0.00019656304,0.00007334014,0.0000748595,0.4434941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498475,0.00089166494,0.00069063646,0.00068395014,0.0000637084,0.000015301133,0.0000054281145,0.0000037575148,0.0026608156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99319917,0.0031606948,0.00027404333,0.00040920379,0.001982733,0.000974098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98175365,0.0076642786,0.0065896916,0.0011577473,0.0018273555,0.0010072597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052066627,0.00034599655,0.0003139132,0.0016463201,0.0018877751,0.0056457003,0.00049132644,0.002429425,0.003275807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01987052,0.0002278214,0.00031692995,0.0007407922,0.014621838,0.0044288826,0.0036864427,0.0030138216,0.00023192998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023262959,0.000045701603,0.011163495,0.000067076246,0.000015271768,0.00009170518,0.0015825978,0.0017022825,0.00021920519,0.9669672,0.00073933724,0.01738288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008187876,0.000464791,0.063953474,0.0011233626,0.00010151314,0.0007758353,0.0051493864,0.018438376,0.0022512777,0.83985394,0.06768455,0.00012164013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009610514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010338018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009610514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004585977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039832084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033273757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201412318","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0043","title":"From birth to agony: The political life of Operation Car Wash (Operação Lava Jato)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Opera; Language change; Lava; Power (physics); Intervention (counseling); Balance (ability); Political science; Political corruption; Law; Sociology; History; Art; Geology; Literature; Psychology; Art history; Volcano","score_opus":0.017486322434149052,"score_gpt":0.255328627901139,"score_spread":0.23784230546698998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201412318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85356516,0.0020509055,0.00041295332,0.039113693,0.00031130595,0.000018809653,0.000026707681,0.000019440837,0.10448104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847665,0.0004254022,0.000050836756,0.0016146201,0.00003853378,0.000009395965,0.000010283101,0.000018915212,0.013065551],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792165,0.00086267956,0.000015495065,0.000119759025,0.00019237585,0.0008881679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825996,0.0004884882,0.00016125906,0.000059760103,0.00021398692,0.0008165742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020809874,0.0002515254,0.00030472165,0.00070625416,0.034402236,0.010288413,0.0009001966,0.0023600198,0.0029685546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033886738,0.0004016847,0.00009389262,0.000569369,0.028967246,0.00329346,0.006502181,0.008075845,0.00031292773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004976536,0.00003202175,0.002654031,0.000021123042,0.000004844831,0.0009954287,0.8980065,0.00006027911,0.0003412461,0.08175714,0.008978976,0.007098688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038099531,0.00003368397,0.004256774,0.000075751355,0.000004087257,0.00018474086,0.83250105,0.000059114107,0.00020907566,0.0032582413,0.1593906,0.000023136196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122134335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19844729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122134335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010536869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008290257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24284685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203351226","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0088","title":"The judicial review of legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Administrative law; Legitimacy; Ultra vires; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.01895730970178488,"score_gpt":0.26709398360848474,"score_spread":0.24813667390669986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203351226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045767337,0.05273668,0.057881836,0.14610498,0.0035357098,0.00018595633,0.00011071845,0.00011152715,0.69356525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94814086,0.011298226,0.0067274487,0.010700455,0.0022476201,0.00009953425,0.00003482258,0.000041483818,0.020709494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9606578,0.025518522,0.0012598886,0.0029887604,0.00779098,0.001783976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96180344,0.025783032,0.0026569641,0.0035515134,0.005520639,0.00068438804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02705354,0.00023728979,0.0005586143,0.0026622151,0.00610493,0.0098317545,0.0013276068,0.004437528,0.0021080743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057922073,0.00032826583,0.00033360653,0.0019208064,0.035974037,0.008662151,0.0038057975,0.0037688727,0.00037716678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002409087,0.000002905293,0.00014261996,0.000029571149,0.0000034159148,0.00002925131,0.0025373078,0.00008146274,0.000050802202,0.98483974,0.002882757,0.009397718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023598748,0.000051043782,0.001191639,0.00051983097,0.000021030315,0.0002411608,0.0037682294,0.00045095396,0.00044770943,0.6481354,0.3451048,0.000044591292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009039399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010727382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02705354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009808859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015700467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14307445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204240245","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0063","title":"Clash of powers: Did Operation Car Wash trigger a constitutional crisis in Brazil?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impeachment; Mandate; Politics; Political science; Constitutional amendment; Democracy; Language change; Presidential system; Law; Separation of powers; Political economy; Constitutional crisis; Constitutional court; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.014173507237649693,"score_gpt":0.2587681920036555,"score_spread":0.24459468476600577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204240245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91136956,0.0009582825,0.00070109713,0.025567496,0.000047601636,0.000050974508,0.000080491445,0.000017935763,0.061206646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979532,0.00018427883,0.00006770297,0.00043254552,0.000008603051,0.000006181719,0.0000111739255,0.0000053569747,0.0013310399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987692,0.0003314047,0.00004287262,0.00015021737,0.0002615693,0.00044469882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740237,0.0009395815,0.00060439593,0.00019689983,0.00035598574,0.000500769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025999697,0.00012817638,0.0002511116,0.00074043113,0.0052968124,0.0039921436,0.0006632515,0.0014243706,0.003183453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00849601,0.00028314083,0.00015609305,0.0007706882,0.010021311,0.0025128496,0.0027527316,0.0026876621,0.00014618463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011263511,0.00009763302,0.070115045,0.0002601531,0.000028357064,0.003829528,0.27979505,0.00078266364,0.0048492597,0.59213936,0.009031853,0.038958456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045169218,0.00020498417,0.19337508,0.0006921196,0.000053016618,0.0013852884,0.43570176,0.0020827777,0.002809423,0.062401444,0.3011311,0.00011787832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17056112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26804778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17056112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009976824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010151947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33913672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205252510","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0137","title":"Remedial consistency in private law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Consistency (knowledge bases); Duty; Wrongdoing; Compensation (psychology); Constructive trust; Law; Sequential consistency; Law and economics; Political science; Consistency model; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Data consistency","score_opus":0.01784485825747845,"score_gpt":0.2559892153328297,"score_spread":0.23814435707535125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205252510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10005018,0.0039007238,0.3112837,0.04528895,0.0006880909,0.00037163222,0.00028377256,0.00035605076,0.5377768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627695,0.00042094043,0.02150419,0.0027562203,0.00042382785,0.00025062665,0.00005938525,0.00006414301,0.011751134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96780336,0.011688685,0.0019342685,0.0052838754,0.010353912,0.0029358612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96780425,0.0151482895,0.0032301033,0.008859472,0.004106136,0.00085169397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02244427,0.00037176444,0.001233009,0.0017941993,0.005334093,0.009099592,0.0023711617,0.007719374,0.005239726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05014017,0.00074441126,0.0013054388,0.0014276012,0.039597392,0.012502757,0.0081009725,0.009534921,0.00058781717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024747433,0.00000467215,0.00007054248,0.000006714961,0.0000024729902,0.000017205666,0.00018630456,0.00019630074,0.000030687308,0.9983347,0.00018694939,0.00096107967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012876103,0.000011241538,0.00016893106,0.000033259515,0.000004756763,0.000049030783,0.00011377006,0.00080710027,0.00015690959,0.9914841,0.0071473527,0.000010652057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003948676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018902412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02244427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00645386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00899282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206450776","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0119","title":"Systemic corruption and institutional multiplicity: Brazilian examples of a complex relationship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Honesty; Incentive; Language change; Enforcement; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Public economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.049469307102950416,"score_gpt":0.26252749595097424,"score_spread":0.21305818884802383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206450776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40432677,0.006709457,0.043904956,0.018010965,0.0001308678,0.0001766263,0.00028810953,0.000114343005,0.5263379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99276334,0.0014066753,0.0026303486,0.000198445,0.000018586343,0.000028430964,0.000025910867,0.000013261202,0.0029149894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964238,0.0023291835,0.0001333619,0.00022553906,0.00049708795,0.00039094966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519134,0.0022072806,0.0010361528,0.00065760897,0.00059168757,0.0003160157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036352493,0.00035210614,0.0004450084,0.001875199,0.005756135,0.0036122596,0.00047754083,0.0011544956,0.003622983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010584433,0.00026687732,0.00041274758,0.0043144403,0.0100706965,0.0026800132,0.004220563,0.0014841888,0.00018142017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022776407,0.00001969416,0.006198953,0.00012425815,0.000011744903,0.0006117817,0.014160263,0.0012401221,0.00024119749,0.96397024,0.0017852267,0.01161378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078176585,0.00009425131,0.03982423,0.0010763607,0.000109509056,0.0027849944,0.036526144,0.010788452,0.0010283878,0.65118223,0.2564022,0.00010514233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038864996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05973297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038864996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006182402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003182777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07727754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206639810","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0055","title":"The limits of evidence-based anti-bribery law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Causal inference; Law and economics; Psychological intervention; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Business; Public economics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07486109082667752,"score_gpt":0.24454920663611618,"score_spread":0.16968811580943866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206639810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003955354,0.09878795,0.039271675,0.7522233,0.004584272,0.00020677962,0.00024631398,0.00017996688,0.10054437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45841002,0.060104337,0.08556009,0.3656671,0.020979498,0.0017012459,0.000288037,0.00035380802,0.0069357925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.597463,0.22220063,0.028746612,0.0330131,0.11232881,0.006247853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23114802,0.68822837,0.0134765245,0.031275466,0.029940382,0.005931204],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4202664,0.0014198391,0.00651473,0.0081327865,0.0060967356,0.027175685,0.009806742,0.027221441,0.0064122034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52620065,0.0021680633,0.0033088147,0.0044003967,0.093403436,0.04422949,0.020271095,0.04925939,0.0022282996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006663671,0.000060887647,0.0004366582,0.00094935024,0.00011662517,0.00010842623,0.00168031,0.0005891202,0.00009797577,0.94695514,0.014861275,0.03407771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007302725,0.00005229016,0.000271779,0.0038411089,0.000044952358,0.00011474203,0.00051613245,0.00048727178,0.000118680386,0.92542535,0.06899287,0.0000617914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006520785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035530915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4202664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014312025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029462598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7149148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208393888","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0062","title":"Private liability without wrongdoing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Plaintiff; Law; Liability; Injustice; Duty; Legal liability; Strict liability; Private law; Permission; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.016246374383488582,"score_gpt":0.20797009930637617,"score_spread":0.19172372492288758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208393888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05545523,0.0022684424,0.11775474,0.03845488,0.0007473601,0.0002577339,0.00023166947,0.00018192253,0.78464806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89630884,0.0010039201,0.012500667,0.007930291,0.0009386586,0.0003318831,0.00014921655,0.00009715022,0.08073944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825378,0.004488262,0.0010150346,0.004140111,0.005562886,0.0022559788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98313576,0.0055899974,0.0018736693,0.005923855,0.0025710675,0.00090564945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009505307,0.00085474947,0.0009729869,0.0015230232,0.004148481,0.006476468,0.0022775505,0.013087724,0.013104734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024450473,0.000682404,0.0013012028,0.00064046774,0.021765262,0.010597698,0.008153456,0.009863422,0.0025941976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053864164,0.00001959291,0.00035517954,0.000018087156,0.000008497994,0.00016402735,0.000292772,0.00021892383,0.000089026835,0.9949941,0.001399893,0.002434513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014748567,0.000021132957,0.00036219473,0.00007031761,0.000014283478,0.0003774163,0.00014344287,0.0009844403,0.0002604161,0.98263204,0.015103931,0.000015629734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002714443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020050395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013104734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038759306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048452187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050269425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212606031","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0090.br","title":"Stephen P Garvey, <i>Guilty Acts, Guilty Minds</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.015146492737580225,"score_gpt":0.2425762131743265,"score_spread":0.22742972043674628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212606031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001243743,0.09898189,0.00036317733,0.83596146,0.031072658,0.000056504337,0.00040075756,0.0000659308,0.031853814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028728385,0.08203453,0.00058253465,0.73100275,0.03605641,0.0002806619,0.00030535428,0.00017753735,0.12083193],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956085,0.0014341417,0.00033744704,0.00056069664,0.0015629492,0.00049624563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820776,0.00797242,0.0005559249,0.0003231761,0.0018685297,0.0010722652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004483506,0.0013401309,0.0008741449,0.0028651212,0.01140152,0.008250213,0.0036082577,0.028966665,0.009860689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020611528,0.0012874502,0.00060942315,0.002912163,0.009207495,0.0066198967,0.0033287958,0.015900241,0.0033569245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005425748,0.000006832883,0.00017769022,0.00006792818,0.000004581583,0.00005925722,0.00087106257,0.000018984376,0.00001812855,0.010929293,0.9846868,0.003153927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038640315,0.000018313665,0.0067260927,0.00088968175,0.000029658675,0.0002203912,0.0084058,0.00010310248,0.00018897517,0.020508856,0.9628126,0.00005783332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30638924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.581794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6936108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006899567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0115011595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6092117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213473835","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0034","title":"Giving reasons as a means to enhance compliance with legal norms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Sanctions; Compliance (psychology); Nudge theory; Enforcement; Law and economics; Relevance (law); Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.013518099946229734,"score_gpt":0.22598813453550332,"score_spread":0.21247003458927358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213473835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69745576,0.0014012819,0.14336951,0.009438483,0.0003761671,0.00085749576,0.00010573805,0.0011936094,0.14580204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365257,0.0004950626,0.058228496,0.0008801951,0.000066058274,0.00026580718,0.000046531553,0.00007455532,0.003417543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97188085,0.020853149,0.0012592493,0.0009331509,0.0042043664,0.00086925784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8586841,0.111743964,0.012860922,0.010450697,0.004060792,0.0021995287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02160019,0.00053484907,0.0004477307,0.0015227492,0.0013429751,0.0038359496,0.0009157115,0.0028508352,0.0056548603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082973614,0.00039455885,0.00085349736,0.0010477788,0.0050896625,0.0039807307,0.002957443,0.0029563284,0.0010659395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007917017,0.0032315094,0.051114272,0.003045076,0.0002957328,0.0009366832,0.105389416,0.0063152025,0.03387771,0.39638662,0.0071529313,0.39146316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007693386,0.0056245695,0.15457828,0.0031139145,0.00069143245,0.0019219862,0.05373207,0.021039922,0.05013461,0.44889536,0.2587252,0.00077328866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035950693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006416093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02160019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009935095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020274008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11423409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213682929","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0099","title":"The city in the constitutional imagination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Megacity; Constitutionalism; Metropolitan area; Government (linguistics); Politics; Urbanization; State (computer science); City-state; Political economy; Silence; Political science; Emancipation; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economy; Economics; Economic growth; History; Democracy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.017607447257000513,"score_gpt":0.2546349311284768,"score_spread":0.2370274838714763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213682929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053159166,0.032994945,0.012954333,0.22704953,0.0014714528,0.000024769011,0.0001342318,0.00007649486,0.672135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97319025,0.003629727,0.00093181676,0.005817813,0.00083648483,0.000029742334,0.000037146587,0.000041190684,0.015485867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442434,0.0033720739,0.00013484771,0.0005430982,0.0007945328,0.0007311103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970606,0.0019359911,0.00014947963,0.00033462569,0.0002645087,0.00025480552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053357827,0.00036938497,0.00049045443,0.0017445799,0.012034822,0.012968573,0.0012771654,0.0045503885,0.0030271702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063712336,0.0003528326,0.00030124094,0.0018714534,0.08043929,0.009583796,0.004807293,0.0064451797,0.00030397795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0397084e-7,6.8486094e-7,0.000018260565,0.0000033201216,2.90723e-7,0.0000067645324,0.0017451376,0.00003138891,0.0000070844585,0.9968767,0.000994175,0.00031542324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007432705,0.0000054242405,0.0001756803,0.000067749075,0.0000024142291,0.000032265176,0.007624599,0.00018364683,0.000070981936,0.8126681,0.17915359,0.000008175578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042373776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0443811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042373776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021338107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011378792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15481949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214682557","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0042.br","title":"Hanoch Dagan, <i>A Liberal Theory of Property</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Mathematics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018800059681103348,"score_gpt":0.2283910366791582,"score_spread":0.20959097699805485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214682557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009509801,0.103028506,0.00904427,0.6003637,0.0066297012,0.000044229884,0.00091221405,0.00008600992,0.2703816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5136541,0.060986586,0.009039824,0.17671055,0.007109779,0.00022852918,0.00038029527,0.00019510857,0.23169528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858713,0.0005321144,0.00005360201,0.00019780207,0.00042303704,0.00020633446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776506,0.0015601447,0.00011825856,0.00014149297,0.0003035401,0.000111551424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022564104,0.00039883022,0.00036088045,0.0009055531,0.005291888,0.004029126,0.001098506,0.0054759523,0.0062047755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007544038,0.00047130775,0.00031970613,0.0015954913,0.0075580566,0.006530714,0.0014704829,0.005078745,0.0011342305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008881403,0.0000046015734,0.00010892154,0.00003289009,0.0000031652462,0.000019921317,0.0006585886,0.00005365502,0.00002651773,0.8861021,0.1108059,0.002174856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021296893,0.0000039562156,0.00082398375,0.000109611494,0.000008960391,0.000038756887,0.0009178494,0.00014863072,0.00026288742,0.652468,0.3451748,0.000021251448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06826604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1256609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93173397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067243264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00521362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13573736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214749934","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0105","title":"‘Within or outside Canada’: The Charter’s application to the extraterritorial activities of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Mandate; Supreme court; Presumption","score_opus":0.013082003700187955,"score_gpt":0.22357188091480212,"score_spread":0.21048987721461418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214749934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03985933,0.011702196,0.0037203408,0.14420159,0.00287501,0.00017148127,0.0006769941,0.00012687744,0.79666626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7260909,0.012176954,0.0053474335,0.070238456,0.00085139746,0.000090897774,0.00054425397,0.00018876822,0.18447103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97948784,0.0022286254,0.00041811026,0.0016766457,0.011560247,0.0046285708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98467165,0.0034735769,0.0005576764,0.0005372774,0.009243572,0.0015161509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008705807,0.00048884045,0.00042167396,0.0023358027,0.02721657,0.017256957,0.0033644068,0.0062009217,0.0049700136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02127342,0.00046029122,0.00060903496,0.004329674,0.015283367,0.0036788026,0.0034709529,0.008545054,0.0005991874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004031677,0.000032321434,0.004811872,0.00018379203,0.000018386276,0.0014393261,0.026465202,0.00071439566,0.0005791428,0.67244023,0.24755658,0.045718458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000149546795,0.000026447995,0.013112614,0.0004933917,0.000052031704,0.00026427206,0.018186133,0.0008395166,0.0008038461,0.017089136,0.9489222,0.0001955303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120054506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26887876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8710605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215614503","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0028","title":"On the breach: Identifying infringements of section 35 rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0310557196913512,"score_gpt":0.27036531051999246,"score_spread":0.23930959082864126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215614503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3107149,0.0036151647,0.06699064,0.030462546,0.00025867147,0.0004385617,0.0002505471,0.00015398063,0.58711493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93910205,0.001671988,0.026175546,0.004770704,0.000083592786,0.00010203464,0.00017073772,0.000063716725,0.027859699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97267514,0.005661297,0.0010513249,0.0015388367,0.013868968,0.0052043786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97505957,0.011751718,0.0027723385,0.0022098816,0.0074913735,0.0007151114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017792003,0.00070805755,0.0007193952,0.008357628,0.013596974,0.016746964,0.0019145765,0.005723847,0.0031142149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04681882,0.00045156517,0.00081206905,0.0049416935,0.028205605,0.012738332,0.010200409,0.0066825124,0.00050996715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033550794,0.000019720184,0.013187187,0.000057213725,0.0000083405475,0.00077820243,0.045555208,0.00033995733,0.0008543002,0.8962303,0.0038831106,0.039052933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018484552,0.000108170294,0.06321914,0.0018566956,0.00015489345,0.0016000909,0.12281277,0.005851,0.008091057,0.5987375,0.19724761,0.00030260824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46893802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50895244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46893802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02850071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042642664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.932417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217101867","doi":"","title":"How the Prison is a Black Box in Punishment Theory (University of Toronto Law Journal, 2019)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01112758708649897,"score_gpt":0.23011584782306796,"score_spread":0.218988260736569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217101867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026622944,0.05909494,0.008044092,0.59681445,0.0041894494,0.000051315423,0.0008754896,0.00007282591,0.30423447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85941744,0.014936007,0.0024458007,0.021247737,0.0014066203,0.00008752778,0.00017735611,0.00013580557,0.100145735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739766,0.0012374274,0.00009614599,0.00028754934,0.00041630305,0.0005649515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967379,0.0013945891,0.0002109999,0.0002319523,0.0007684092,0.0006561383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030570652,0.00057331845,0.0005647649,0.0016563564,0.013530017,0.013882572,0.0013787572,0.0067328196,0.012948642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006776112,0.00080125785,0.00046730423,0.0034334997,0.043084495,0.009535825,0.0032076812,0.005533525,0.0008465964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008676303,0.000005164893,0.0003616911,0.00006571669,0.0000063146913,0.000046228557,0.007311574,0.00020870224,0.000014794061,0.9292196,0.05766899,0.0050824997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026164262,0.00001245425,0.0052595567,0.0004473252,0.000035455585,0.000090681686,0.012389393,0.00052016653,0.00008119434,0.68468744,0.29640335,0.00004683147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8783731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058275156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0426155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4765702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200022466","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0059","title":"Heritage preservation easements, urban property, and heritage law: Exploring Canadian common law and civil law tools for responding to international cultural preservation frameworks for cities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Cultural heritage; Cultural heritage management; Cultural property; Industrial heritage; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Property law; Property rights; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11015196299193279,"score_gpt":0.24222850522882433,"score_spread":0.13207654223689153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200022466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063084476,0.0077253687,0.0103154,0.080263436,0.00040979148,0.00015186741,0.00019544139,0.00007459285,0.83777964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453382,0.0057999725,0.0053205322,0.0068282727,0.00008305427,0.0000940084,0.00009432487,0.000063771804,0.036377814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930495,0.001406508,0.00015012582,0.00053099304,0.0023469469,0.00251604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940527,0.002519037,0.0003680105,0.0003263497,0.0017761738,0.0009576988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005200766,0.0006131869,0.00047296507,0.0042322725,0.03306511,0.023726698,0.0028536425,0.0038547136,0.007161303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00965908,0.0004973571,0.0005727777,0.0077360286,0.052055504,0.006760552,0.007940109,0.0068525244,0.00023831255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031043464,0.000007616258,0.000870719,0.000029831685,0.0000027829997,0.00012742291,0.017765293,0.0002866797,0.00004540073,0.96881515,0.0053608976,0.0066851326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016654374,0.00001915001,0.010961956,0.0008186953,0.000049105864,0.0002036528,0.17776878,0.002581407,0.0003760511,0.22406211,0.58301544,0.00012695156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.209718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.209718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2615248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9166151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200610885","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0136","title":"Automating accountability? Privacy policies, data transparency, and the third party problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Argument (complex analysis); Internet privacy; Analytics; Usability; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Computer science; Privacy by Design; Data sharing; Business; Computer security; Data science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.036533492700662785,"score_gpt":0.28441747803439976,"score_spread":0.24788398533373698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200610885","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07095858,0.003718779,0.6990216,0.19700196,0.0008908759,0.000627819,0.00030365004,0.0025235235,0.024953216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76555914,0.0016104417,0.2112138,0.016297925,0.0007531674,0.0007921027,0.0002587685,0.0007215562,0.002793056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.66208065,0.25052637,0.016187117,0.01874866,0.04297019,0.009487041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29831982,0.49610484,0.050417304,0.12102131,0.030487055,0.003649639],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22165224,0.0013501592,0.0017420432,0.0042087757,0.008748791,0.02120406,0.0048327665,0.010712979,0.0029238043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3701439,0.0017507293,0.0025514136,0.006597765,0.027686704,0.051883407,0.015198709,0.018895902,0.0009891457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002690656,0.00032363404,0.025968498,0.0011866152,0.0002575885,0.00064530625,0.029074918,0.008574185,0.00368401,0.7247916,0.012373025,0.19285154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013080824,0.00013391131,0.0052335,0.0013130845,0.00013920668,0.0007825979,0.007911893,0.02390839,0.011445508,0.8689329,0.07978564,0.00028257142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008705741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003080574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22165224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009325273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023221292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9598414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205940295","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.163","title":"The Sword in the Zone: Fantasies of Land-Use Planning Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Urban Planning and Landscape Design","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Deference; Urban sprawl; Urban planning; Law and economics; Political science; Urbanism; Sociology; Architecture; Geography","score_opus":0.014895571651411081,"score_gpt":0.20096314137191182,"score_spread":0.18606756972050073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205940295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056591306,0.013886744,0.025287038,0.44708863,0.0013450878,0.000058438727,0.000058055448,0.00013030114,0.4555543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95670754,0.002748221,0.0035076144,0.018123684,0.0007091014,0.0000935213,0.0000243344,0.00009176431,0.017994136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98424464,0.010796263,0.00027411946,0.0012681569,0.0023555686,0.0010612934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917287,0.0061921445,0.00040573167,0.0007349052,0.0005098167,0.0004287349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01870079,0.00056038564,0.0006035224,0.0017658704,0.012468092,0.021245617,0.0023866417,0.008358414,0.003021139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016791755,0.0007212239,0.0006627154,0.001374557,0.11093848,0.021689035,0.010904899,0.013277642,0.0005413319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040559753,0.000004484976,0.000066025525,0.000009546775,0.0000010002601,0.00004799287,0.011563454,0.00007770216,0.000032346412,0.9847801,0.0016134763,0.001799931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014162738,0.000019417317,0.00015944969,0.00013450476,0.0000033729013,0.00010880433,0.019534517,0.00047485332,0.000079062076,0.8935605,0.08588967,0.000021689426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009693438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006746833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99030656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008701878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005149009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09890044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206351923","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2021-0062","title":"Private liability without wrongdoing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Plaintiff; Law; Liability; Injustice; Duty; Legal liability; Strict liability; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.017375205652467533,"score_gpt":0.2157921753736549,"score_spread":0.19841696972118736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206351923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05545523,0.0022684424,0.11775474,0.03845488,0.0007473601,0.0002577339,0.00023166947,0.00018192253,0.78464806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89630884,0.0010039201,0.012500667,0.007930291,0.0009386586,0.0003318831,0.00014921655,0.00009715022,0.08073944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825378,0.004488262,0.0010150346,0.004140111,0.005562886,0.0022559788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98313576,0.0055899974,0.0018736693,0.005923855,0.0025710675,0.00090564945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009505307,0.00085474947,0.0009729869,0.0015230232,0.004148481,0.006476468,0.0022775505,0.013087724,0.013104734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024450473,0.000682404,0.0013012028,0.00064046774,0.021765262,0.010597698,0.008153456,0.009863422,0.0025941976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053864164,0.00001959291,0.00035517954,0.000018087156,0.000008497994,0.00016402735,0.000292772,0.00021892383,0.000089026835,0.9949941,0.001399893,0.002434513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014748567,0.000021132957,0.00036219473,0.00007031761,0.000014283478,0.0003774163,0.00014344287,0.0009844403,0.0002604161,0.98263204,0.015103931,0.000015629734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002714443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020050395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013104734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038759306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048452187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050269425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206459726","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0086","title":"Discrimination and the value of lived experience in Sophia Moreau’s <i>Faces of Inequality</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explanatory power; Sketch; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06146223311865459,"score_gpt":0.3144872413944259,"score_spread":0.25302500827577135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206459726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10806559,0.078365736,0.012061753,0.20008864,0.0025689935,0.000025886286,0.000075997,0.0000394756,0.5987079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97193277,0.008303087,0.0006472692,0.006179647,0.0006667997,0.000027052882,0.000021901722,0.00001777889,0.012203695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978807,0.0013171745,0.000035529596,0.00014359779,0.0003629923,0.000260055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821234,0.0011735047,0.00022354253,0.00012314854,0.00012512889,0.00014228253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018754802,0.00022760886,0.0002832456,0.0005576757,0.0042655864,0.006882914,0.0007404072,0.0021912374,0.002032123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003211962,0.00014484236,0.00026514812,0.000717189,0.02937958,0.007952013,0.0043273848,0.003863751,0.00017836652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007022359,0.000005717059,0.00033845467,0.000046517704,0.0000032873356,0.00009125782,0.026070856,0.000076866505,0.000031465694,0.9632124,0.004904897,0.005211182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006670492,0.00002183196,0.0027132602,0.00063875946,0.000010210764,0.00044718443,0.029202541,0.00035639733,0.00013803819,0.7488478,0.2175937,0.00002357754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007322782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008181651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005241603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018394486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038030684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210304826","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0125","title":"Legal gaslighting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Political science; Normative; Law; Pretext; Function (biology); Context (archaeology); Confusion; Politics; Authoritarianism; Rule of law; Democracy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.010368217863916429,"score_gpt":0.2400624610593805,"score_spread":0.22969424319546408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210304826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010205994,0.0027621605,0.01647651,0.07565145,0.0020279754,0.00010269686,0.00014868955,0.00031549527,0.89230895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6695197,0.0024308315,0.009878071,0.055872213,0.0016389361,0.0002128831,0.00021514673,0.00023049937,0.26000172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923833,0.0018985592,0.00033179307,0.0013476872,0.0025332149,0.0015054157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421126,0.0019046672,0.00034811487,0.0013892682,0.0015499152,0.0005967741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062588835,0.00048309765,0.0004712811,0.0013360318,0.00829924,0.009865532,0.0020443432,0.007344252,0.02519765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020169534,0.0003649839,0.0006601567,0.0009104745,0.020103449,0.009619586,0.0066765957,0.0089532705,0.0028810934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006284123,0.000003951067,0.00007904123,0.000014699788,0.0000013980166,0.000059353417,0.0012008229,0.000049196417,0.00010263921,0.9836082,0.01083681,0.004037551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014784479,0.000027401184,0.00033463552,0.00016387801,0.000008619124,0.0001530258,0.0020168494,0.000445143,0.00065144774,0.35078672,0.64536816,0.000029380279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025370538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025862662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025370538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01148566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00965344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08429456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210499943","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0038","title":"Chronotopes of security legal regimes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Chronotope; Politics; Function (biology); Political science; Space (punctuation); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.010960562283310509,"score_gpt":0.22814213561783633,"score_spread":0.2171815733345258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210499943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24137537,0.0018501533,0.05285846,0.0019846312,0.0002810239,0.00027546586,0.000591386,0.00013280626,0.7006507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97744864,0.0007946464,0.010643395,0.0001644673,0.00007781677,0.00016369039,0.000208379,0.000029502891,0.01046946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986058,0.0004367149,0.00011991052,0.00026124486,0.00033308193,0.00024329712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977925,0.0006721915,0.0005924149,0.00032127678,0.0004225662,0.00019901042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00170763,0.00021656697,0.00016849427,0.002445652,0.002082635,0.0038204018,0.00044074262,0.00072045036,0.0063785426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003918898,0.00026932606,0.00034891977,0.0014610647,0.008479949,0.0053199437,0.0017151926,0.0014839505,0.00041656912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100765,0.000005356102,0.0005707684,0.0000135195405,0.000001360347,0.000030663658,0.0015091598,0.00018104857,0.00017147351,0.9945616,0.00026670372,0.0026783247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008649073,0.00013493237,0.02038005,0.00021922917,0.000023566929,0.00062882225,0.013618618,0.0031670774,0.0009145531,0.80883926,0.15192695,0.000060505685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031554534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053816927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063785426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038713028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018278168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02808845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211202533","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0113","title":"Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Harm; Redress; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026247015115743136,"score_gpt":0.1927512163600884,"score_spread":0.16650420124434528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211202533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00186662,0.0021275743,0.005815225,0.0108670425,0.0013275539,0.00013668889,0.00094219536,0.0005149938,0.97640216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09761883,0.0061210566,0.007441614,0.015611753,0.0016651042,0.0003715982,0.0033785102,0.0008655245,0.8669261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961301,0.0008185666,0.00022493886,0.000712484,0.0014941957,0.00061976735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960348,0.0007322458,0.00026450102,0.00088644715,0.0012400078,0.00084197865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027209322,0.00062782055,0.00042529652,0.0009196075,0.0027929393,0.0062769535,0.0018359431,0.0025823151,0.22297579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010163487,0.00031569533,0.0007695547,0.0010763229,0.0025823591,0.0054986407,0.0061029163,0.0032658936,0.09318239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005967203,0.00004760932,0.0015310722,0.0003222098,0.000016783248,0.00045078582,0.0026311052,0.00026218762,0.0005501525,0.40458685,0.42660818,0.16293347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046985933,0.000007824602,0.00025740918,0.00007904596,0.0000028063673,0.00019841627,0.00020735545,0.000032387445,0.00008490792,0.015145168,0.9839739,0.0000060091397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004911869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054284954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22297579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003047141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064577595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213358528","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0011","title":"Index to Volume 60","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.013791657626865348,"score_gpt":0.17057936720903633,"score_spread":0.15678770958217098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213358528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031933573,0.0025455756,0.0002300315,0.002589726,0.00813956,0.00025857612,0.00580776,0.0008732198,0.9792362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00061566685,0.00079718884,0.000049803308,0.0006446168,0.0011398547,0.00006125672,0.000988302,0.00017677547,0.9955265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988035,0.00009244127,0.00006563744,0.00016764896,0.0007000779,0.00017066768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699426,0.00047083662,0.00017044468,0.00036430635,0.0011585762,0.00084159774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006803267,0.0024427301,0.002551904,0.0139109,0.004330848,0.008421129,0.0023460076,0.0035078798,0.8296714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005853231,0.000950653,0.0010209569,0.010281588,0.0015087848,0.0035037883,0.0042089056,0.002519771,0.794639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010145387,0.000020431347,0.000075124786,0.00008867012,0.0000021453413,0.000012308097,0.000017718201,0.000027700484,0.000047981473,0.0013236017,0.98243296,0.015941244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009706313,0.0000091662605,0.0006649529,0.00019019822,0.000003702755,0.000013519648,0.0000389916,0.0000637187,0.000045529316,0.0009905077,0.9979614,0.0000086606315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033520438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06361512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17032862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004871438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039254217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.242953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214568452","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.151","title":"Book Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0114450027348881,"score_gpt":0.22306126153045783,"score_spread":0.21161625879556972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214568452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039141974,0.03894872,0.00038258522,0.04138428,0.02507168,0.000118537355,0.0009579374,0.00030517834,0.89243966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011488334,0.0056131543,0.000064354695,0.004083555,0.0021619576,0.000024162511,0.00019339015,0.00005196346,0.98665875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.000081411265,0.000026938478,0.00009319323,0.0007605873,0.00013709105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972817,0.00042626564,0.00010404014,0.00023040506,0.0014560964,0.00050155714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076236285,0.00061974773,0.0007302441,0.0032498662,0.0034982953,0.005388267,0.0012789944,0.003716848,0.368121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050023724,0.00048359222,0.00049502746,0.0038089154,0.0012688441,0.0020337058,0.0016069532,0.002905515,0.23267773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019381748,0.0000032515698,0.000018415232,0.00002653367,6.1120653e-7,0.000010899588,0.0000101775895,0.000013524997,0.000011822278,0.0015694824,0.98753464,0.01079885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015428116,0.0000017492185,0.000108026565,0.00005482608,0.0000012266312,0.0000117406125,0.00002263289,0.000009960879,0.000010732393,0.000412062,0.9993637,0.0000017469612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061636955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20954065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.368121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006461809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008648854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9012987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214589949","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0006","title":"Editor’s Note","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0050501246256619186,"score_gpt":0.19391079293196778,"score_spread":0.18886066830630585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214589949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053616834,0.0025291175,0.00023369609,0.614172,0.35545316,0.00015388578,0.0004189848,0.00023247019,0.026270462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003917438,0.0012603607,0.00039553532,0.7383132,0.11299765,0.00025453893,0.00008260785,0.00012905877,0.14264964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883471,0.0008206599,0.0010093105,0.0025088182,0.0051994137,0.00211459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761086,0.007846342,0.0015434148,0.0014518343,0.01003193,0.0030178535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007097426,0.002183405,0.004114909,0.0031216138,0.01464108,0.014838032,0.007165685,0.07119402,0.05101911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060278412,0.0022704287,0.0033877075,0.0030840072,0.0047573373,0.0055936794,0.004125706,0.050895456,0.02990644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104393885,0.000006783801,0.000058245278,0.000028837932,0.00000792124,0.00014381969,0.000058431717,0.000017893775,0.000032882388,0.00087783847,0.9975515,0.0012054462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033325203,0.000013920368,0.0007525875,0.00022570188,0.000044722037,0.00013276834,0.0003311783,0.0001590125,0.00019758048,0.0011649376,0.9968874,0.000056890967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06873112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20090617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07119402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013427674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023732938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17067587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220808168","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0113","title":"Flexibility, choice, and labour law: The challenge of on-demand platforms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Compensation (psychology); Phenomenon; Labour law; Independent contractor; Business; Labour economics; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.01775278847469003,"score_gpt":0.23653833117302303,"score_spread":0.218785542698333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220808168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12182343,0.0046564667,0.072407454,0.2592112,0.0008030574,0.00013409503,0.00024212542,0.00016979613,0.5405523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9432783,0.0011256901,0.0074375183,0.014269886,0.0010003056,0.00025131876,0.000058576396,0.00012052544,0.032457914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98842096,0.0047897818,0.00040267128,0.0020516887,0.0025322777,0.00180274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98303026,0.010619089,0.0011370481,0.002751149,0.0010338596,0.0014285997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010728065,0.0005858327,0.000836374,0.0008824604,0.009005007,0.015443442,0.0035972036,0.01353458,0.013388515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0180752,0.0005479901,0.0013107331,0.0009707661,0.036699306,0.015925422,0.010259156,0.010425725,0.0018390127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011032364,0.000016112976,0.00026456648,0.000015672078,0.0000029637213,0.00009168878,0.001210202,0.00030085508,0.00007893182,0.9933761,0.0018641241,0.0027678746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026311976,0.000021047352,0.00038806282,0.000113056645,0.000005173078,0.000078523386,0.0012100658,0.0015015443,0.00010378986,0.9692593,0.02726184,0.000031250478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108715035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062946035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015443442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057674935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004369031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05673611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221090915","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0096","title":"The reinvention of Canadian tort law, 1945–95: <i>Jordan House</i> as case study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Pleading; Law; Plaintiff; Lawsuit; Redress; Political science; Tort reform; Doctrine; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.026942741274139426,"score_gpt":0.26372171234855196,"score_spread":0.23677897107441254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221090915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78621286,0.006158294,0.0008748991,0.011403987,0.00016636729,0.00025710862,0.00044494984,0.00003236608,0.19444923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95685947,0.0032030805,0.0010574865,0.0023506365,0.000036928086,0.000078429315,0.00015221139,0.000020319429,0.036241405],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955153,0.0007519772,0.00009186819,0.0003218279,0.0014786489,0.0018403976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966691,0.00065173267,0.00030610687,0.000129889,0.0014317405,0.0008115161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035220995,0.00044217505,0.00035149773,0.0039247056,0.0372003,0.004164664,0.0020253495,0.0023439138,0.0034784456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053587393,0.0004132139,0.00037023742,0.006059566,0.011483592,0.0017268996,0.0043950314,0.00319735,0.00033700356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018526845,0.00037351702,0.06282861,0.00025493687,0.000052620137,0.011992558,0.45855597,0.0012802874,0.0012008781,0.3139295,0.06849253,0.080853306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035539695,0.00012071788,0.06679694,0.00036761005,0.00005280059,0.0026710986,0.28704745,0.0010644009,0.0018811717,0.0036436494,0.6361702,0.00014837639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13995153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13995153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12580031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99753433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223498131","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0085","title":"Frontiers of legality: Understanding the public policy exception in choice of law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Public law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Comparative law; Doctrine; Philosophy of law; Common law; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.0494973636357639,"score_gpt":0.286267658032464,"score_spread":0.2367702943967001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223498131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08012637,0.010670705,0.15520571,0.17570114,0.00076464156,0.00012022991,0.000092968425,0.00011020203,0.577208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97752756,0.0030159522,0.0087974155,0.00425022,0.00076804566,0.00012567727,0.000041169944,0.00005915911,0.0054147793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918665,0.0048092594,0.00021171058,0.00082568865,0.0013076133,0.0009791881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850735,0.011466043,0.0011591171,0.0008537633,0.0006815999,0.00076595315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011314901,0.00053774286,0.0008943353,0.0030436548,0.0075012674,0.01843717,0.0028003652,0.008634241,0.0038962935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013297574,0.0004877281,0.001086379,0.002493598,0.08042515,0.030554509,0.009808066,0.011335889,0.00055212673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011801671,0.0000031790269,0.000058230882,0.0000052167943,3.9167733e-7,0.00001670817,0.0011988367,0.0000931971,0.000011389441,0.9979519,0.00013158712,0.0005282075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029504488,0.0000032080743,0.000104831044,0.00004512745,0.0000013712358,0.000019255149,0.0010558687,0.0004656246,0.000019559602,0.99171066,0.0065674647,0.000004110098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071977526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031968637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01843717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010972444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007926917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223521672","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0127","title":"Of linchpins and bedrock: Hope, despair, and pragmatism in animal law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Scholarship; Environmental ethics; Environmental law; Law reform; Bedrock; Animal rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Transformative learning; Pragmatism; Sociology; Property rights; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Welfare; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.0068280068223254935,"score_gpt":0.18287298040866923,"score_spread":0.17604497358634374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223521672","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12835398,0.016339974,0.036936734,0.40876752,0.0012678982,0.000050708888,0.00006194063,0.00014858686,0.40807262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726317,0.0015537287,0.0022343616,0.014669011,0.0003593207,0.00005244962,0.000010463746,0.00005103926,0.008437887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99149746,0.0060387063,0.000150477,0.0006718,0.0009839264,0.000657553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864759,0.0101677505,0.0010536205,0.0008984443,0.00069942,0.0007048535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010083712,0.00036510607,0.00050510163,0.0014903893,0.010140004,0.013677861,0.0014918213,0.0073680393,0.0030073698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154476045,0.00039556596,0.00042104116,0.0012861211,0.13217819,0.016256224,0.008326123,0.01141969,0.00048703403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007412109,0.0000062535737,0.00021563125,0.000010206269,0.0000013064359,0.00005127434,0.011250161,0.000042873355,0.000035760553,0.9851554,0.0015305602,0.0016931726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010936208,0.000015783531,0.00036650215,0.00013688741,0.0000037551222,0.000095311516,0.013779392,0.0004019379,0.00009900099,0.9523158,0.032755036,0.000019614134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054895505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006790109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013677861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007112392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005017352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053328395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229616329","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.197","title":"THE FRENCH RESPONSE TO THE WORLD BANK'S <i>DOING BUSINESS</i> REPORTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Resistance (ecology); Comparative law; Legal realism; Sociocultural evolution; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Commercial law","score_opus":0.009359559792998856,"score_gpt":0.17810038901662656,"score_spread":0.1687408292236277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229616329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004636439,0.009064908,0.00033719107,0.94699216,0.007860249,0.000023182107,0.00060498744,0.00013108169,0.03034977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11208158,0.010087498,0.0012772306,0.77947706,0.014982936,0.00014431041,0.00078581297,0.00031447047,0.08084912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98077786,0.0054920968,0.000894903,0.0012545947,0.008212957,0.0033675772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595337,0.019717963,0.0050790533,0.0010690964,0.012143739,0.0024564539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016486412,0.0014424297,0.00080651126,0.0035465423,0.009870446,0.017231671,0.0021241524,0.022718005,0.0071887425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04139099,0.00085972226,0.0012890857,0.004014827,0.0064662,0.004003119,0.0029153635,0.012241333,0.001671709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051756117,0.000013588271,0.0013262668,0.00012628229,0.000023837723,0.0005460515,0.0021224085,0.00014962394,0.00026378568,0.04082249,0.94805235,0.006501473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001690203,0.000023946684,0.005089096,0.00020813607,0.000017985889,0.00013576857,0.0020514533,0.00015747205,0.0003562862,0.0016326422,0.99023974,0.000070571085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36391875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2344159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36391875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026682695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020402491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.723601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229847917","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0009","title":"Nazi Law and the Concept of Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023156464497248955,"score_gpt":0.2512282348904293,"score_spread":0.22807177039318033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229847917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06348726,0.021122502,0.023543177,0.06316648,0.00084817444,0.000107454995,0.000067318884,0.00006632407,0.8275913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658202,0.0026209718,0.0036258877,0.003954124,0.00042402124,0.00012813718,0.000029402914,0.000026948019,0.023370318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935789,0.0034698376,0.00019955638,0.00081798993,0.0011057212,0.00082796847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973024,0.0011059821,0.0003917647,0.00034001176,0.00037785748,0.00048198545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052712234,0.0004338994,0.0004860513,0.0024635284,0.0134816,0.009366618,0.001351765,0.004904542,0.004038937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004773086,0.00029516136,0.00045171697,0.0021216988,0.08932157,0.014404747,0.01099421,0.0047927215,0.00057556847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001331006,0.000001696768,0.00003253237,0.000003195458,4.395291e-7,0.0000071733157,0.0012682569,0.000021151336,0.000009235718,0.9975805,0.00040766207,0.0006668086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010875639,0.000010324715,0.00016379768,0.00005054799,0.0000018097805,0.00004366399,0.001608049,0.00018536314,0.000036712143,0.9267033,0.071177654,0.00000803255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01072079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007806782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010118169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00571492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073412836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230044696","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020415r","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Legislation; Legislature; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.019827583048009672,"score_gpt":0.2606447722653794,"score_spread":0.24081718921736975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230044696","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023275372,0.43236455,0.0011877897,0.056890924,0.07750231,0.00012262535,0.0016082292,0.00045881805,0.42963198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019861965,0.23864374,0.0010013034,0.032821912,0.0251017,0.000114351016,0.0014861104,0.00023607459,0.6986087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988727,0.00012097463,0.00005639492,0.00013295146,0.00073025184,0.00008664023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961294,0.00080576236,0.00017795253,0.00018749326,0.0022558868,0.00044348618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009782354,0.0005573624,0.0008884485,0.0032423246,0.0012912061,0.004653369,0.0019097815,0.003044442,0.21323338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075114374,0.00036937514,0.0004768685,0.0038455764,0.0009226069,0.0032878,0.0015401681,0.002968563,0.18681787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023398386,0.000003960261,0.000014026907,0.00010886908,0.0000011142404,0.000013745937,0.00001565322,0.000013227725,0.000017027682,0.0012363808,0.96684664,0.031726964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014267921,0.0000020170485,0.000047593745,0.00020239218,0.0000011678937,0.000038624497,0.00001816161,0.000003478944,0.000007277871,0.00030237212,0.99937385,0.0000017647285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009986333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022893528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21323338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026155654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050952667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7133367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230155788","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.219","title":"ABUSE OF JOINT DOMINANCE IN CANADIAN COMPETITION POLICY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Oligopoly; Competition law; Industrial organization; Predatory pricing; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Monopoly","score_opus":0.010254059207268192,"score_gpt":0.18231725752718989,"score_spread":0.1720631983199217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230155788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051972095,0.011875155,0.0093465205,0.1490507,0.0009706714,0.00015471771,0.00058562064,0.00016132453,0.7758832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.854907,0.007139071,0.0074343733,0.02807258,0.00041703926,0.00011229632,0.0002480284,0.00010146287,0.10156822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97205013,0.0036521729,0.0011299945,0.0023005295,0.014051936,0.0068151285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807457,0.004954049,0.0009210918,0.0014201225,0.009833219,0.0021259827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011878269,0.0005234543,0.0007311759,0.003813711,0.02229343,0.014199693,0.0026110215,0.0064670886,0.007032779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029467212,0.001027756,0.00081545924,0.006618267,0.015229623,0.0055821748,0.005244926,0.0064554596,0.0003612815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014493791,0.000009372971,0.0012403649,0.000047113794,0.000012356098,0.00009889597,0.0026592934,0.00070991623,0.00017057717,0.9555146,0.025789432,0.013733714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006471083,0.00005745404,0.023915147,0.00051392085,0.00009457748,0.00023683085,0.005067135,0.0055306684,0.0007490255,0.22945425,0.73392266,0.00039373816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98913515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17117074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17117074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22925623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96132445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230840024","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.01","title":"Errors of Fact and Law: Race, Space, and Hockey in <i>Christie v York</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Dissent; Law; Economic Justice; Space (punctuation); Race (biology); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Gender studies; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011768011800210797,"score_gpt":0.23144332909019,"score_spread":0.2196753172899792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230840024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30280408,0.009805287,0.0017021423,0.24688874,0.0011887284,0.00004364467,0.00017505749,0.00003811231,0.43735427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97347236,0.0013815023,0.00016967411,0.0048849573,0.00012496018,0.000012144919,0.000020216963,0.000026784966,0.01990738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957969,0.0012614458,0.00012406726,0.00039770603,0.00086764485,0.0015522931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941835,0.0029478217,0.00079330587,0.00026870813,0.0007339151,0.0010726209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003498056,0.00024664827,0.00044891002,0.0014143842,0.031266216,0.017404867,0.0019639723,0.0051763332,0.00445854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013760378,0.00046680245,0.0002122892,0.0017208823,0.061696533,0.0072432067,0.006668145,0.007806491,0.0002598374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018154922,0.000011753871,0.0037069607,0.000033401437,0.000007649527,0.00092347414,0.20421991,0.00024369931,0.00004954051,0.7562403,0.02794554,0.006599634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002867372,0.000025278468,0.015749056,0.0007255068,0.000059869664,0.00071406196,0.43505657,0.0006096982,0.00050185225,0.10230213,0.44404554,0.0001817754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90215635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92873013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09784365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057686448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050813444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41854644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231199517","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.153","title":"LEGITIMATING PUBLIC POLICY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Public policy; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Policy making; Democratic legitimacy; Policy analysis; Position (finance); Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.049899822072171154,"score_gpt":0.28419272028929593,"score_spread":0.2342928982171248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231199517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02031098,0.0024652565,0.091247775,0.23126704,0.001550364,0.00028235314,0.00019359893,0.00043687568,0.65224576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93583196,0.0015706654,0.0231374,0.015527346,0.0010972178,0.0002735171,0.00013893213,0.00017922386,0.022243848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92919225,0.025496073,0.002256923,0.007998297,0.027163701,0.007892774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8979909,0.051264048,0.005258881,0.017139452,0.024676185,0.0036705974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0775707,0.0008143728,0.001250063,0.0051917075,0.016578058,0.02212119,0.0037414776,0.0105277,0.0065429956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13200668,0.0007036582,0.00084581866,0.0030455033,0.07397242,0.010473177,0.012250878,0.013944029,0.0010635407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029717742,0.000005630344,0.00021847532,0.000022732282,0.0000053010654,0.000022819404,0.0017365662,0.0002710056,0.000053079075,0.99172544,0.0021056724,0.0038302278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025572017,0.000010453063,0.0005187466,0.00027293706,0.00002006231,0.000025271733,0.0015766729,0.0007422355,0.00037328425,0.8380347,0.15837264,0.000027409404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16816956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14707658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16816956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039029125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104320765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41023797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231600438","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0018","title":"Editors' Note","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.006507595387370583,"score_gpt":0.21848238169627268,"score_spread":0.2119747863089021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231600438","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008789876,0.0034176344,0.0003571821,0.5725047,0.33248407,0.00028129749,0.00109758,0.0005813015,0.08839726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047665094,0.0012614856,0.0005026147,0.54388267,0.06333928,0.00043883806,0.00018474952,0.00021561907,0.3854082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869927,0.00080610503,0.00093796523,0.0031586094,0.005973145,0.0021313915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764826,0.0081783235,0.0011576904,0.0015763296,0.010362898,0.0022420767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00722779,0.0021117637,0.0038175862,0.003935286,0.014808026,0.016076393,0.0077897557,0.056128185,0.09351195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05689403,0.0022532716,0.003375772,0.0036372996,0.0045295004,0.0059776325,0.0045568165,0.037472013,0.054252688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010989105,0.000008486209,0.000064405045,0.000025711395,0.000007546128,0.000076856595,0.00007619786,0.000018818393,0.000036175086,0.0020144302,0.9961514,0.0015089732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003408755,0.000014171532,0.00073739537,0.00016286549,0.000043454434,0.000052120162,0.0002833885,0.00014249967,0.0002145638,0.0013950972,0.9968786,0.00004173181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09223673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21911152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09351195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013576261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020822458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3128286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231632637","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.185","title":"REPRESENTING INDIGENOUS SELF-DETERMINATION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Opposition (politics); Indigenous rights; Legislature; Political science; Political economy; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Self-determination; Law","score_opus":0.013262252575638518,"score_gpt":0.25375521245036986,"score_spread":0.24049295987473135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231632637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11837391,0.0016353418,0.0067645446,0.027289191,0.00049306033,0.00006796836,0.000035894976,0.00008596563,0.84525424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282234,0.0005007176,0.0010398299,0.0013039552,0.00006604775,0.00001991245,0.000011293771,0.000021838807,0.06881307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954631,0.0018750593,0.00012441896,0.0003695198,0.00081378635,0.001354158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732023,0.00080204086,0.00020958553,0.00039133144,0.0005966694,0.00068005646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044011325,0.00025823282,0.00027624585,0.00058748724,0.015095985,0.007961536,0.0010334079,0.0019462792,0.007495958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004653109,0.00016881847,0.0002421631,0.00058546045,0.022617707,0.0033310095,0.008163195,0.0028644688,0.0006890732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067823917,0.000008523445,0.00090269087,0.000031528165,0.0000029991925,0.00029354164,0.2269197,0.00012233987,0.00043362705,0.753743,0.007237867,0.010297429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006640382,0.000051668983,0.0030167394,0.00020719002,0.000020441861,0.00041624098,0.19025189,0.00067160436,0.0011359525,0.09386621,0.7103112,0.000044284894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14367129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23927969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8563287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018931413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01548776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28567004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231885791","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4263","title":"‘Writing separately’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Law; Concurrence; Variety (cybernetics); First amendment; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.04536705882565019,"score_gpt":0.3641999661543541,"score_spread":0.31883290732870395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231885791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008700209,0.0026800917,0.030051937,0.08415237,0.056569945,0.00016530795,0.00031692864,0.0008566063,0.8165066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13104025,0.0017436105,0.020398762,0.0506992,0.015880471,0.00025038826,0.00049403403,0.0014260585,0.77806723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864139,0.0052728374,0.00097154273,0.0019597984,0.004026349,0.0013554972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753092,0.009716239,0.0015580141,0.004791064,0.0057363464,0.0028892395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008155852,0.00075605843,0.0005632033,0.0011298917,0.0054798205,0.006529626,0.0012890557,0.0034150013,0.077828616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046202566,0.00041829798,0.0005849275,0.0010897424,0.00488577,0.0069617513,0.007410323,0.008324961,0.0528793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059529517,0.00004067714,0.0005136022,0.00020201775,0.000018575603,0.0005042489,0.019518802,0.00007863309,0.0015663708,0.29337877,0.5651353,0.11898345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050505164,0.000018425457,0.000249317,0.00010767352,0.000005732254,0.00027477415,0.0018907,0.000079252386,0.0005107073,0.017754817,0.9790856,0.000017977345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013761452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029819172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077828616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017766249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045262356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26036268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232098802","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.855","title":"EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY CANADIAN MEDICAL PATENT LAW IN PRACTICE: JAMES BERTRAM COLLIP AND THE DISCOVERY OF EMMENIN","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Medical History and Innovations","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Futures studies; Commercialization; Negotiation; Legislation; Law; Political science; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.013114811937105463,"score_gpt":0.19823958666533387,"score_spread":0.18512477472822841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232098802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059507757,0.075227454,0.003329076,0.408503,0.0017623194,0.00007316675,0.00016415895,0.00007636896,0.4513567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8398197,0.03009729,0.0018811175,0.039472833,0.0006863287,0.00004479392,0.00004492316,0.00007753311,0.08787551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941146,0.0011482759,0.000121091696,0.0005257925,0.0026256887,0.0014646138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925961,0.004149543,0.00031353103,0.00024233786,0.0016428274,0.0010556828],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064919125,0.00034806327,0.0003291461,0.002080334,0.031145958,0.011254983,0.0015208538,0.006921849,0.0030155615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013079991,0.00049745146,0.00024138835,0.0034289735,0.046469945,0.004020385,0.0029966375,0.0070969695,0.00032104086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023240244,0.000013717446,0.00067003403,0.000046317935,0.0000059814947,0.0006597842,0.044715583,0.00024128711,0.0002162261,0.88250214,0.05646882,0.01443688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021321772,0.000016876787,0.004142627,0.00039813257,0.00001660538,0.00030872872,0.020648258,0.00034219853,0.00043979156,0.05802627,0.9155426,0.00009647506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96885407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16183117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14983056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97215706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232172700","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.555","title":"THE PARADOX OF RULE OF LAW REFORMS: HOW EARLY REFORMS CAN CREATE OBSTACLES TO FUTURE ONES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Politics; Law reform; Face (sociological concept); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Path dependence; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.010629426809805146,"score_gpt":0.22601544636713128,"score_spread":0.21538601955732614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232172700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08878682,0.0101423655,0.04690272,0.56524444,0.0016963783,0.0002955788,0.00015376425,0.00019870327,0.28657922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395857,0.0029154704,0.0104398895,0.031260695,0.0006809659,0.0002813832,0.000058482736,0.00016678813,0.014610608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9437716,0.029725803,0.0019024007,0.00505177,0.012436369,0.007112139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9043901,0.06191923,0.0071495757,0.008903946,0.011685581,0.005951566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06452168,0.0005368694,0.0013965593,0.002580941,0.016229253,0.020711666,0.0034384616,0.012523031,0.004149872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123015545,0.0007612819,0.0011101,0.002534717,0.048393615,0.025181873,0.012208862,0.023534106,0.0007613313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020359927,0.000041267147,0.000651218,0.000060131537,0.000011997852,0.00017168478,0.0072112205,0.00042469442,0.00013170045,0.9801412,0.0043231007,0.006811438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008233208,0.00008691516,0.0020650225,0.00029891924,0.000022586824,0.00016689627,0.008935713,0.0011535464,0.0006103514,0.8622926,0.12420429,0.00008076759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017771415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017902792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06452168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02014261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027946185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34122735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232671323","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.135","title":"THE ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND INDIGENOUS LAW: A CASE STUDY IN ‘LEGAL ASSOCIATION’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Normative; State (computer science); Association (psychology); Political science; Legal research; Legal realism; Legal pluralism; Associative property; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006247602781100124,"score_gpt":0.23525494792052445,"score_spread":0.22900734513942433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232671323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92011255,0.00063703174,0.001981265,0.007791419,0.000076294695,0.00010600512,0.000014583359,0.000015000309,0.069265805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254805,0.00048078186,0.0012180887,0.000435392,0.000032631706,0.00005217332,0.000006749582,0.000006043389,0.0052200574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122626,0.005686259,0.0002205945,0.00045525224,0.0012220169,0.0011895342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923127,0.005040208,0.00083088083,0.0004619801,0.0005021676,0.0008520598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00776713,0.0002782094,0.0004832259,0.0015514931,0.030161837,0.0045208414,0.001854141,0.0052338615,0.0024789022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01256619,0.0005425528,0.0005095753,0.003050141,0.017187838,0.0049160914,0.0076948716,0.0056571043,0.00016614585],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019566669,0.00020342499,0.013295353,0.00007972948,0.000012545714,0.023993807,0.8091465,0.00027375,0.0004489861,0.14132394,0.001701478,0.009500804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017271379,0.00015228288,0.023350522,0.00022731385,0.000050059152,0.020508468,0.85693544,0.0018837372,0.0005934564,0.016110234,0.0801084,0.000062888495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15495896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30728152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15495896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010130043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008276137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.308114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232737770","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.811","title":"CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE CRIMINAL LAW: RETHINKING CRIMINAL TRIAL BIFURCATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Punishment (psychology); Certainty; Culpability; Deterrence (psychology); Conviction; Criminal law; Criminology; Law; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sentence","score_opus":0.06492241565591172,"score_gpt":0.23049865253854734,"score_spread":0.16557623688263562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232737770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33316812,0.0044179303,0.1748904,0.08470504,0.0012174216,0.00026969743,0.00018371905,0.00024698334,0.4009007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901703,0.00025430898,0.005370995,0.0017491748,0.00020987703,0.00008054787,0.000014383928,0.0000373473,0.0021131164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802744,0.009598822,0.0012076354,0.003180482,0.0036505254,0.0020881137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97221315,0.018911783,0.0020065813,0.0036687383,0.0018249736,0.0013746044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023915473,0.0002867819,0.0009434525,0.0016128247,0.005797929,0.010110196,0.0017744157,0.006484474,0.0037585439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06737498,0.00062746846,0.0010637636,0.000979464,0.039486244,0.011231093,0.0094575295,0.011022938,0.0004089951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013564182,0.0000064061537,0.0002361624,0.000011026613,0.0000039930374,0.0000398721,0.00050451944,0.00036997878,0.00014273793,0.9962197,0.00020156725,0.002250446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004446324,0.000036430618,0.00062940613,0.000060064798,0.00001413561,0.000052170173,0.00032163973,0.001472595,0.0003215508,0.9902541,0.006769568,0.000023805698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033605145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033178218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023915473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007943918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008544197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12647861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232802946","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.609","title":"Sexual History Evidence in Cases of Sexual Assault: A Critical Re-evaluation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Sexual assault; Sexual history; Scope (computer science); Psychology; Power (physics); Criminology; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Computer science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.15347285082328962,"score_gpt":0.37010928053891573,"score_spread":0.2166364297156261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232802946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03847935,0.23326825,0.03689076,0.57542634,0.0070370235,0.00069277955,0.00013232196,0.000055032007,0.10801816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8069926,0.12605059,0.015336074,0.035925783,0.009149692,0.0006517532,0.00006690145,0.000054279495,0.0057723583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97236913,0.019893767,0.0021540006,0.000984974,0.0036490625,0.0009490441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80191857,0.18048622,0.0039154817,0.0028984195,0.01003611,0.00074522983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046814688,0.0008725455,0.0014582971,0.010342643,0.007751377,0.011531062,0.0041785557,0.015077782,0.0017832716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107285164,0.00095264864,0.0009295351,0.003237691,0.06268362,0.02673349,0.0058222893,0.016739704,0.00030481548],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026500671,0.000016409243,0.0005062171,0.0008456459,0.000021634125,0.00064408366,0.012013442,0.00025666613,0.0001237497,0.96166414,0.0048335423,0.01904794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030311623,0.00007444725,0.002169009,0.009465449,0.00010757663,0.001563497,0.03236408,0.0016146438,0.00087619835,0.7821719,0.16945729,0.000105733205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009424076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012844513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046814688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022334535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009871644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24758273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233044663","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.41","title":"DEFERENCE, DEFIANCE, AND DOCTRINE: DEFINING THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Statute; Standard of review; Doctrine; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Judicial deference; Substantive due process; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Separation of powers; Legislature; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01872079232334788,"score_gpt":0.26243890550361487,"score_spread":0.24371811318026698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233044663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05860707,0.087382406,0.12577802,0.079798706,0.001237503,0.00031926885,0.00017655863,0.00018712584,0.6465134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94350994,0.008843266,0.020575576,0.007144206,0.0017150902,0.00033028662,0.000065063716,0.00008545136,0.017731076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9605327,0.018705342,0.002991993,0.0034955216,0.01137985,0.0028945124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92213476,0.05479332,0.004457757,0.0066625807,0.009185878,0.0027657629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04086169,0.00032865506,0.0010652087,0.004345259,0.004357731,0.018019365,0.00260039,0.007880401,0.0020845116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094870254,0.0006710725,0.00050201884,0.0018045314,0.042313296,0.012775319,0.006199467,0.0066044875,0.0005345685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003878371,0.000003657206,0.00015304543,0.000012854864,0.0000015503892,0.000025347574,0.00053226744,0.00013245408,0.000060329545,0.9942821,0.0009775391,0.0038149324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140733555,0.000020382411,0.00042246009,0.00022341924,0.0000059375625,0.0000892222,0.00046979327,0.0007466919,0.00014506548,0.9565376,0.04129941,0.000025910127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010376992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010692527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04086169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011411656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012664067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2160998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233971825","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.61","title":"THE VERY IDEA OF A JUDGE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Skepticism; Order (exchange); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.009444938411722052,"score_gpt":0.2465539911978685,"score_spread":0.23710905278614644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233971825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01273343,0.0072236657,0.038471382,0.20199169,0.003479148,0.000100830395,0.00012453932,0.00012342552,0.7357519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8303897,0.003200857,0.01118782,0.043478794,0.0022080184,0.00021708939,0.00010063968,0.00012958364,0.109087534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99177307,0.0038931817,0.0002928371,0.0016332767,0.0015148199,0.00089274376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581015,0.0018244977,0.00033312142,0.0004435538,0.0007174654,0.0008712584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00663965,0.00037228316,0.00045950865,0.0012670212,0.005855221,0.009748805,0.0016022887,0.0073113833,0.006069969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011212015,0.00044429692,0.00040095,0.00082179136,0.039821096,0.011302814,0.0041284105,0.008405006,0.0021005634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031700918,0.0000024118997,0.000065161454,0.0000073393653,0.0000010731183,0.00001851084,0.0016685494,0.000021307249,0.00003402698,0.9912976,0.005557478,0.0013234048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017833283,0.000022495491,0.0001763148,0.00010445768,0.000006928897,0.00012591714,0.0024399187,0.00028242142,0.00011814535,0.6529033,0.34378314,0.000019175906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062767183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004604768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009748805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050885803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056231203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03692043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234508442","doi":"10.3138/utlj020614-03ra","title":"LIST AND PETTIT ON GROUP AGENCY AND GROUP RESPONSIBILITY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.02383678178646964,"score_gpt":0.20909330993204833,"score_spread":0.1852565281455787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234508442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011278385,0.02535115,0.018840067,0.31045407,0.0017298925,0.0000878289,0.0002405134,0.00006009086,0.63195795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7136444,0.0148388175,0.010084731,0.04767247,0.0025780532,0.00032414653,0.00013065504,0.00015656566,0.21057013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969747,0.0014798127,0.000115212926,0.0003214537,0.0007686471,0.00034031473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917317,0.0060716085,0.0002647108,0.00048794626,0.001171751,0.00027230996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00399286,0.000515543,0.0007208353,0.0017595273,0.008436958,0.006909801,0.0015026396,0.010911114,0.015859392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012703663,0.00049847696,0.0005082738,0.0025339988,0.025107048,0.008805123,0.0027590771,0.00731541,0.0015984549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006043042,0.0000046693713,0.00006630496,0.000015295524,0.00000198859,0.00002118583,0.0014967568,0.00007064287,0.000010463829,0.9808982,0.016227925,0.0011805863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002530356,0.000011904549,0.0006454977,0.00019444044,0.00001593193,0.000042096595,0.002070469,0.00030113198,0.0001030215,0.84019834,0.15636355,0.000028385759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08366783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14227605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08366783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012437155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005754441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16636163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234579946","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.737","title":"POLICING MORALITY: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND THE CRIMINALIZATION OF INCEST","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Constitutional court; Law; Supreme court; Political science; German; Context (archaeology); Morality; Criminology; Sociology; Constitution; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.04781127884243131,"score_gpt":0.2756272408217971,"score_spread":0.22781596197936582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234579946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18877555,0.0082557695,0.036608417,0.10620936,0.00090065773,0.00012481923,0.00014260827,0.00007828065,0.6589046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993651,0.0006032855,0.0010977057,0.0016652538,0.00017178556,0.0000386843,0.000014614826,0.000015132036,0.0027426698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028426,0.004545486,0.00040175626,0.00096891326,0.00203437,0.0017651973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903313,0.005013332,0.0015211949,0.0010414199,0.0013431695,0.00074970693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010602268,0.000390283,0.0004274456,0.002670471,0.0086431075,0.010936884,0.0015971442,0.004573172,0.0022608312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022267101,0.00041558352,0.0004276343,0.0016296555,0.09246706,0.0075169033,0.0058489875,0.0065389248,0.00013738424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014204338,0.0000041494354,0.00026853182,0.000005601789,0.0000012178197,0.000027781942,0.001718925,0.000106923035,0.000021871569,0.99652314,0.00031625884,0.0010041732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010757013,0.00001995974,0.0021901582,0.00016688467,0.00000839704,0.00009634954,0.006415308,0.00044579885,0.0002046567,0.9538485,0.03656866,0.000024538891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019798415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017050967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019798415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008591567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010093836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062336445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234787365","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.293","title":"On Non-domination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.027096492398328113,"score_gpt":0.28365787032774564,"score_spread":0.2565613779294175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234787365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03518863,0.008814922,0.045703813,0.062492523,0.00092769327,0.00006220547,0.000035676352,0.000046210167,0.84672827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434977,0.002561953,0.0027247802,0.0076734745,0.0006693121,0.000111506066,0.000020280675,0.00007653226,0.0426644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99218327,0.0040519675,0.00017548958,0.000956392,0.0016055992,0.001027268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937757,0.003510795,0.0004156692,0.00083998806,0.001077114,0.0003806484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009071508,0.0005889817,0.0006022138,0.0012250971,0.006402204,0.0066833124,0.0014667015,0.0026828975,0.0041210554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008030349,0.00018264243,0.0006769452,0.0010325083,0.05169659,0.009803025,0.006552161,0.0062472005,0.00066661177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011062115,0.0000014416108,0.000035218298,0.0000050614353,8.966784e-7,0.000014618551,0.00084193907,0.000024066041,0.000017313996,0.99811697,0.0003702727,0.00057117204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036438219,0.0000061424703,0.00010609265,0.00004393237,0.000002398833,0.000040832096,0.00079460524,0.00014302069,0.00009282353,0.9674221,0.031340383,0.0000039966235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040135817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030153277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009071508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066477414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037290193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048232913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235133096","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.ellickson","title":"THE ENTITLEMENTS OF UNALLIED HUNTERS AFTER A SEQUENTIAL CAPTURE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whaling; Humanism; Animal rights; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Geography; Environmental ethics; Ethnology; Fishery; Political science; Law; Sociology; Archaeology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0070778236559528515,"score_gpt":0.20449883932619814,"score_spread":0.19742101567024528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235133096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6155143,0.0006433378,0.0067151412,0.011037677,0.0002488692,0.000100888836,0.00016525981,0.000047949456,0.3655266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97140133,0.00012829172,0.00061336387,0.0020448903,0.00009079556,0.00006408665,0.00004305907,0.000012413128,0.025601825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572766,0.0006577865,0.00019479303,0.0011030978,0.0008556291,0.0014610718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668914,0.0011175418,0.0004677419,0.0006718632,0.0005484692,0.0005052084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040895957,0.00024969134,0.00032114616,0.00081412186,0.010781999,0.003230614,0.0016646786,0.004727889,0.0061383885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011636673,0.00055297493,0.00054900226,0.00058461924,0.012075894,0.0043482017,0.0058285156,0.004107336,0.0005775102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017093023,0.00009008747,0.024985222,0.00004897032,0.000058211073,0.003741686,0.04561139,0.00046079524,0.0025643802,0.8894009,0.011234741,0.021632621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017019566,0.0005895601,0.12782037,0.0005896995,0.00030471114,0.0057534706,0.050848298,0.0043051005,0.0038596888,0.4393048,0.36605984,0.00039418793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049585324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09897235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95041466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003751876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050856336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098593414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235229934","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.657","title":"COVENANTS FOR THE SWORD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; SWORD; State (computer science); Political science; Constitutional law; Covenant; Phenomenon; Punishment (psychology); Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Power (physics); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Business; Epistemology; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03918655260594354,"score_gpt":0.2586597190380242,"score_spread":0.21947316643208067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235229934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039222132,0.002717906,0.01967698,0.03641512,0.001049724,0.000082548955,0.00007867799,0.00013001768,0.90062696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86666596,0.0010140034,0.0023774842,0.008841429,0.00062515965,0.000105519044,0.00008652305,0.00018604154,0.12009793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991581,0.0029645218,0.00044913546,0.0017445949,0.0017737471,0.0014868642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954574,0.001249471,0.00039246673,0.0011701137,0.0009912043,0.0007393925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00560419,0.00036865554,0.0006107131,0.001544213,0.012028785,0.013073763,0.0012499671,0.004894773,0.018079266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012909817,0.0004062446,0.0005367369,0.0011354716,0.03424729,0.010339651,0.010819862,0.007700477,0.0024775537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004406725,0.0000047460303,0.00014803592,0.00000820441,0.0000031713246,0.000043601412,0.0020573952,0.00003462454,0.000056826848,0.9920151,0.0030344888,0.0025893021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016310498,0.000025906393,0.00089689915,0.00024214428,0.00001874983,0.000112007816,0.006319143,0.00031645256,0.00028974895,0.59644043,0.39528862,0.0000336236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013521046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015892148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018079266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049676397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008676191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06048113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235892352","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.899","title":"THE CONSTITUTION AND THE RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Principle of legality; Excuse; Political science; Acquittal; Self defense; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009736492840438149,"score_gpt":0.20614915803564135,"score_spread":0.1964126651952032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235892352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034496557,0.0021945657,0.026553817,0.030645115,0.0004924246,0.000057265235,0.00006386011,0.000059473557,0.9054369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510429,0.0008104265,0.0043125055,0.0041415477,0.00031529594,0.00009323268,0.000037764727,0.000039903978,0.03920642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929831,0.0031775937,0.00030665996,0.0009578204,0.0012841285,0.0012907253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430275,0.0028833053,0.00042919617,0.0012539793,0.00074850785,0.0003822512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008214824,0.00030212422,0.00047092716,0.00097492215,0.0057563265,0.0058073946,0.00074425904,0.0046599004,0.005282847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010037759,0.0003698448,0.0005759721,0.00056797144,0.04656464,0.0048184223,0.004801714,0.0050950884,0.00082808034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001752538,0.0000017992297,0.00004225365,0.0000030336664,7.135953e-7,0.000011629809,0.00021977788,0.00004681703,0.00002956593,0.998953,0.00024634786,0.0004432676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018435834,0.000012417159,0.0002702909,0.00005833728,0.0000049964783,0.0000679553,0.00027448585,0.00020472035,0.00017163983,0.95373577,0.04516915,0.000011768827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077320538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065509384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008214824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044413363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064979685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043444633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236243580","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.315","title":"FREEING MIGRATION FROM THE STATE: MICHAEL TREBILCOCK ON MIGRATION POLICY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration policy; Opposition (politics); Citizenship; Democracy; Immigration law; Politics; Political science; Political economy; State (computer science); Economics; Law","score_opus":0.007953827998630062,"score_gpt":0.22955567058172005,"score_spread":0.22160184258309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236243580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077055395,0.026900703,0.0015166481,0.68666196,0.002411142,0.000022618495,0.000044351727,0.000040010138,0.27469698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4155216,0.03952387,0.0024198296,0.25207844,0.002644221,0.000119306285,0.000058344984,0.00009860953,0.2875358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977197,0.00086427113,0.000033578643,0.0002654837,0.00041545212,0.00070154795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876237,0.00045285202,0.0000658964,0.00004109252,0.0002488954,0.00042900568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021111378,0.00033511265,0.0003163431,0.0009082101,0.011125501,0.0055787135,0.0014430425,0.005098471,0.005452291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034956348,0.0002376822,0.00033496926,0.0013021772,0.008395628,0.0041013644,0.0023126504,0.005081782,0.00079599686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011951876,0.000019070216,0.00031109503,0.000041646585,0.0000031411423,0.00013820519,0.004179081,0.0004809274,0.00006797999,0.7743167,0.20775105,0.012679205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012531067,0.000013032933,0.0006887774,0.00033659692,0.00000624289,0.00008688717,0.0041401475,0.000430198,0.00010587149,0.12309161,0.8710556,0.000032535496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43340144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4356443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97976774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020232249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022631489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8617575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236495455","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.237","title":"THE EVERYDAY PROBLEM OF EMERGENCIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Principle of legality; Mistake; Rule of law; Politics; Law; Empirical research; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012930951744914413,"score_gpt":0.2337491872356998,"score_spread":0.2208182354907854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236495455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025967276,0.020416055,0.015764818,0.3619578,0.002806978,0.00008062719,0.00024848615,0.00007808501,0.5726798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988488,0.012441382,0.006105875,0.024486816,0.0029260917,0.00018992762,0.00017630165,0.000104142644,0.05472071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99095434,0.005328715,0.00047596608,0.0009936669,0.0013084731,0.0009388704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906256,0.006243636,0.00064214296,0.0008661687,0.00093470194,0.0006876687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00872705,0.000484347,0.0007128776,0.0011013561,0.014561392,0.012060362,0.00209392,0.011432159,0.006601247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022189576,0.00052437565,0.0005512788,0.001274878,0.06180754,0.017626109,0.007144385,0.011228139,0.00084123557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003955385,0.000004306427,0.00015991845,0.00003461782,0.0000028074294,0.00012118003,0.007006343,0.00011691328,0.000025473684,0.97884285,0.010927478,0.0027541297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009794035,0.000009897205,0.00036892606,0.00021422545,0.000005228249,0.0003064696,0.021799752,0.00017600326,0.000046935922,0.7380701,0.23897636,0.000016450389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01142584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012466361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014561392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008446474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007520935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061283708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236913483","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.ziff","title":"THE LAW OF CAPTURE, NEWFOUNDLAND-STYLE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Style (visual arts); Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Possession (linguistics); Corollary; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006093123986782072,"score_gpt":0.18610896164325544,"score_spread":0.18001583765647336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236913483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119598866,0.007392449,0.0026112667,0.021116924,0.00031797876,0.000044307275,0.00042347968,0.00004034789,0.84845436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8094653,0.002216949,0.0007163736,0.0055448283,0.00007209068,0.000038482332,0.00013297546,0.000017534816,0.18179545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987098,0.00009957785,0.000032496657,0.00023139211,0.0002950873,0.0006315694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993968,0.00015268625,0.00007408852,0.00006560556,0.00020945564,0.00010136169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057975424,0.0002308483,0.00019117248,0.0005710513,0.009734302,0.0042519555,0.0007469331,0.0014294024,0.0038146807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014276515,0.00026345276,0.00017221601,0.0007769972,0.011784644,0.0015372875,0.0023036234,0.002342457,0.00030322306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052253137,0.00002217165,0.008474475,0.00006324867,0.000018156476,0.00088826474,0.016565474,0.00051950465,0.00060994166,0.90552396,0.044794265,0.022468278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025692632,0.000041712767,0.051714543,0.00035183353,0.000050428956,0.000575184,0.010773373,0.0005943295,0.00070578774,0.037793767,0.8972873,0.00008602504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9632492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054862235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054862235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028949922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3980552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237118766","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.241","title":"HUMAN FREEDOM AND TWO FRIEDMEN: MUSINGS ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF GLOBALIZATION FOR THE EFFECTIVE REGULATION OF CORPORATE BEHAVIOUR","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Globalization, Economics, and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Polity; Sovereignty; Politics; Shareholder; Human rights; Political economy; Economics; Market economy; Law and economics; Political science; Corporate governance; Economic system; Law; Management","score_opus":0.03385570397036306,"score_gpt":0.21246495380309774,"score_spread":0.17860924983273468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237118766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035239708,0.011607723,0.012042097,0.2717778,0.0016189035,0.00003328335,0.000034853918,0.00004800351,0.66759765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148822,0.0031260166,0.0020562066,0.02898322,0.0007263965,0.000052955318,0.000012302028,0.000036734953,0.05012397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962907,0.0020010856,0.000083611085,0.00039401348,0.0006989629,0.00053173536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970577,0.0020262538,0.00019318402,0.00031224784,0.0001657112,0.00024495367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056741196,0.00038858457,0.0003639282,0.0007077422,0.0069522085,0.0059183505,0.0007153763,0.0053254524,0.0040174876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005787027,0.000226742,0.0004380389,0.00046630614,0.0726875,0.0066419467,0.00560195,0.007289071,0.0003120697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005199953,0.0000030598874,0.00007349089,0.0000052618057,0.0000012556508,0.00003069253,0.0034362075,0.000065232445,0.00002676708,0.9920644,0.0023102488,0.0019780507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000131458455,0.000015027638,0.00062572875,0.00011773802,0.0000045831575,0.000052052612,0.004181909,0.00020664018,0.00021744736,0.8393088,0.15523718,0.00001980741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008731584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010225034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008731584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059344214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003299291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04305744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237137637","doi":"10.2307/825996","title":"Dealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01072058484516884,"score_gpt":0.22477020344622411,"score_spread":0.21404961860105529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237137637","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1449853,0.07051516,0.0020179623,0.5806555,0.0009055129,0.00011392352,0.00021189137,0.00006726836,0.20052737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8938811,0.028950656,0.0011115762,0.05172335,0.00042243823,0.000043215034,0.00004969117,0.000034135344,0.023783963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991497,0.0012033877,0.00030719253,0.0003873284,0.002976301,0.0036287566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909161,0.0031992237,0.0008146681,0.00020850678,0.0027281782,0.002133359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00555261,0.0004130975,0.0006515128,0.0017726144,0.051550206,0.012577673,0.0028918847,0.010163775,0.003717222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014557658,0.00051326596,0.0005495368,0.0037354697,0.026130842,0.004294504,0.008077874,0.011404552,0.00022977317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045648274,0.00010665004,0.017317211,0.0003234323,0.000076048935,0.00724867,0.18649384,0.0008877901,0.00050114386,0.51107955,0.21287598,0.06304406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000541189,0.00005761432,0.047826968,0.0020825055,0.00018037378,0.004042546,0.43842044,0.001281453,0.0009362815,0.0748707,0.42992434,0.00032257522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080616675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080616675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1849768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58491766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237314774","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.617","title":"THE HABIBI LIBEL TRIAL: DEFAMATION AND THE HIDDEN-COMMUNITY BASIS OF CRIMINAL LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Subversion; Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0366780363691468,"score_gpt":0.24976368039579408,"score_spread":0.2130856440266473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237314774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58728796,0.0044311625,0.0024631484,0.099095926,0.00030396134,0.00004264615,0.000033749136,0.000015788319,0.3063256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933129,0.00036367495,0.00019294067,0.0026165687,0.00008420397,0.000016181675,0.000004718149,0.000005769435,0.0034030988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641126,0.0018992525,0.000065652814,0.00033103183,0.00036680902,0.0009259735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478877,0.0034232943,0.0005713699,0.00028039733,0.00043325493,0.0005029623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004645928,0.00017409955,0.00033789163,0.0009650697,0.011481643,0.01118968,0.0012440135,0.005897945,0.004394017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010306456,0.0002238029,0.00017810157,0.00087257783,0.031874415,0.0093274405,0.00791058,0.0068950304,0.00029354155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004145881,0.000038377337,0.0031463893,0.000035969922,0.0000049161517,0.0008974695,0.04919245,0.00008519428,0.00014160866,0.9345403,0.003222213,0.0086537395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092772614,0.00008403661,0.01204609,0.0006310174,0.000019126606,0.0011756073,0.1737074,0.0016325995,0.0007384943,0.7124326,0.09737239,0.000067917405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013629417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027920231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013629417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063783946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004579219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046278715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237425038","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.799","title":"NEW MODES AND ORDERS: THE DIFFICULTIES OF A <i>JUS POST BELLUM</i> OF CONSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Law; Political science; Constitution; International law; Politics; Municipal law; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Public law; Public international law; Sociology","score_opus":0.006363238006426126,"score_gpt":0.21425249150764336,"score_spread":0.20788925350121723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237425038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08044158,0.006234548,0.08529876,0.15421207,0.0016854614,0.00019478663,0.00007403893,0.00022540933,0.6716334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631631,0.0012107984,0.011411117,0.00473078,0.00058866246,0.0002501189,0.00003677693,0.00009754163,0.018511089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98095083,0.010414557,0.0007745405,0.001833032,0.0042931936,0.0017339529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98937994,0.0056144255,0.00079395436,0.0021210979,0.001091705,0.0009988352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017439853,0.00045685013,0.000734569,0.0023401235,0.010842509,0.021095566,0.0020689869,0.0061045215,0.0042326483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01929342,0.0006628708,0.0007320194,0.0013029675,0.10063821,0.0281705,0.013269029,0.01687506,0.0007346083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002167073,0.0000030681006,0.00003856668,0.0000027089734,3.0178745e-7,0.000007796513,0.0010938221,0.000029694724,0.000009987035,0.99723285,0.00024153857,0.0013374344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010514893,0.000014159432,0.00016667834,0.000037759135,0.0000014870229,0.000045132198,0.0026015565,0.0004921686,0.000066934284,0.9620898,0.034461074,0.000012765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006959543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062037613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021095566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015376231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011423922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11156291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237555607","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.155","title":"MICHAEL TREBILCOCK AND THE PAST AND FUTURE OF LAW AND ECONOMICS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Scholarship; Coase theorem; Law; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Transaction cost; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007666033138728695,"score_gpt":0.16043229367241765,"score_spread":0.15276626053368897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237555607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027315158,0.248973,0.002760435,0.61764044,0.0043063755,0.000008269122,0.000041049338,0.000039136055,0.123499736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46076736,0.2012886,0.0075885714,0.15897822,0.032974288,0.00010525755,0.00007060305,0.00012649833,0.13810062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723816,0.0013760459,0.00007782617,0.00037132044,0.00068715704,0.00024946206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956311,0.0027253323,0.00031059762,0.00026338518,0.000615037,0.00045457302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034769038,0.00040248965,0.00045304187,0.0015159062,0.004544543,0.0104941055,0.0010756274,0.0051055336,0.0054408954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007205212,0.0003129844,0.00026925854,0.0018806199,0.020998748,0.009767397,0.0017617038,0.0070268945,0.0009309935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008888368,0.0000053693643,0.00007017884,0.000029555958,0.0000023471603,0.000034316163,0.00081578345,0.000066591725,0.000020653742,0.9400269,0.051848058,0.007071476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005080905,0.0000069160883,0.00028541576,0.00020347958,0.000002220411,0.000078298464,0.00069852086,0.00019012281,0.00004155657,0.45085967,0.5476154,0.000013398125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03019603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042964775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010738581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065687383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07791424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237582122","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.349","title":"IDEAS, INTERESTS, AND INSTITUTIONS: CONCEDING CITIZENSHIP IN BANGLADESH","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Independence (probability theory); Human settlement; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Human rights; Identity (music); Political science; Urdu; Work (physics); Sociology; Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Gender studies; Political economy; Politics; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.02962039295173821,"score_gpt":0.2833240569912619,"score_spread":0.2537036640395237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237582122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30229998,0.003391567,0.002102673,0.06346284,0.00016913904,0.000043271826,0.00004361587,0.000023345916,0.6284635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99272716,0.0006254372,0.00016355536,0.0010766448,0.000023702634,0.000015880587,0.000005314462,0.000005907445,0.0053564534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401975,0.004026482,0.00015185229,0.00033003706,0.00067380036,0.00079816696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99283934,0.0043620626,0.0009273149,0.00044542368,0.00047141715,0.0009544504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077484725,0.00029135533,0.00032210653,0.0013372068,0.012429813,0.010932093,0.00089235324,0.004585359,0.003200105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008474282,0.00029102468,0.0001993338,0.0021317413,0.061365034,0.0063182074,0.011898894,0.0047026845,0.00030839627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015216039,0.000017471099,0.0021290733,0.000027882572,0.000004560169,0.00030472825,0.14120948,0.00010428327,0.00017670056,0.84870374,0.0017861313,0.0055206977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044927176,0.00006330602,0.0052900417,0.00028677852,0.000018234445,0.000340347,0.35560983,0.00026983596,0.0004852494,0.39625952,0.24127075,0.00006113202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020235637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02806288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020235637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012833738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006877414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09311569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237651009","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.491","title":"THE PERSISTENT DILEMMAS OF DEVELOPMENT: THE NEXT FIFTY YEARS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Politics; Political science; Work (physics); Law and development; Field (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Path dependence; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Development studies; Neoclassical economics; Economics","score_opus":0.021537289022471356,"score_gpt":0.22887168505616956,"score_spread":0.20733439603369822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237651009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02590996,0.39967057,0.0024139683,0.5148948,0.006025791,0.00002598765,0.000082604805,0.00004903933,0.050927296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6241206,0.23471403,0.0063760816,0.08944698,0.0061558755,0.00024077586,0.00015180735,0.00009861877,0.03869517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99246526,0.003618876,0.00037834983,0.00059273257,0.0015724808,0.0013723663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99064016,0.0051409295,0.0006593917,0.0006527586,0.0011417445,0.0017649469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015165863,0.000620942,0.0010090455,0.0025771717,0.0094392095,0.016946286,0.0013888876,0.007538699,0.0058625033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017231824,0.000543501,0.0005262899,0.0031883006,0.03329969,0.024367638,0.010629289,0.008164288,0.0005526488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050318376,0.00004454905,0.0010138229,0.00025661453,0.000013415296,0.00024051775,0.018244507,0.0004306322,0.00014933532,0.8763372,0.042092677,0.06112653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009670046,0.00003642212,0.0010077693,0.0008903975,0.0000074423206,0.0001732785,0.022915067,0.00025746133,0.00007689136,0.34443137,0.6301431,0.000051128398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011585266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019107966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016946286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016549243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015034315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120073736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238454917","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.fernandez","title":"FUZZY RULES AND CLEAR ENOUGH STANDARDS: THE USES AND ABUSES OF <i>PIERSON V POST</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Law; Style (visual arts); Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Literature; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.014220824814434626,"score_gpt":0.18470277522737175,"score_spread":0.17048195041293712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238454917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11328687,0.017696533,0.020864507,0.2987941,0.0009130131,0.000035600635,0.00007314473,0.000057871184,0.54827833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96685934,0.0022816735,0.0018815587,0.015090415,0.00026416645,0.000041958632,0.0000127793655,0.00003457089,0.013533379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917258,0.004207887,0.00027044804,0.0009708596,0.0022023995,0.00062253495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921708,0.0056982604,0.000498766,0.00060538494,0.0008141184,0.00021260155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008174039,0.00025020394,0.00033679963,0.0009962782,0.0075082183,0.008981043,0.00092610816,0.0054666246,0.0013657028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016456995,0.00040380785,0.00027558452,0.0013131609,0.04652948,0.010534637,0.0038139303,0.0073475027,0.00017764703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004149363,0.0000022113652,0.00012952759,0.000008224324,0.0000012295827,0.00003189479,0.0047212923,0.000016674177,0.000021144555,0.98935086,0.0030821958,0.0026306193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020242987,0.0000338479,0.0014688319,0.00029276067,0.000017284752,0.00020843396,0.010999842,0.0006670854,0.0006229981,0.7859375,0.19968863,0.000042568383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04412173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047762267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95587826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00918206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056496956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08772987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238569443","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.250712","title":"THE OFFICE OF OWNERSHIP&lt;sup&gt;†&lt;/sup&gt;","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01637918581381339,"score_gpt":0.1804790408094979,"score_spread":0.1640998549956845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238569443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036019825,0.0020779716,0.00054558733,0.026147071,0.0033229617,0.000044606957,0.002853449,0.0003727323,0.96103364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009027757,0.0002863092,0.000073922616,0.00035939107,0.0001388825,0.000006688636,0.00014189346,0.000040499028,0.98992455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882656,0.00006590498,0.00004599307,0.00015716186,0.0005765439,0.00032784222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708134,0.00039999041,0.00025122616,0.0002364882,0.001003383,0.0010274136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000913932,0.00045680616,0.00038260108,0.0008082203,0.0042033195,0.005596282,0.00074618007,0.002755504,0.4082941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034309048,0.00036112996,0.00020173013,0.0009274764,0.0017616365,0.0015789528,0.0017186186,0.002506747,0.09763366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034735483,0.000010401233,0.0005567985,0.000044053548,0.0000027496417,0.000089715606,0.00038693732,0.000044293756,0.00027707,0.07404047,0.8995174,0.02499538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006746996,0.000004378166,0.0011793242,0.00002902961,0.00000309372,0.000020030959,0.0003364762,0.000093006274,0.00020335274,0.0014567295,0.996662,0.000005844967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25351012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33961955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4082941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068848566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013423134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84399664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238681007","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.279","title":"PRIVATE LAW AND KANTIAN RIGHT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Normative; Categorical imperative; Autonomy; Law; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Kantian ethics; Philosophy; Public law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01993033948230251,"score_gpt":0.18697039109619312,"score_spread":0.16704005161389063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238681007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038726132,0.0080148205,0.07371347,0.06983175,0.00088121917,0.000043179745,0.00008597151,0.00012712613,0.8085764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397038,0.0016670796,0.009346259,0.009028888,0.0005492019,0.00007190652,0.000045455574,0.00007045093,0.03951691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472433,0.0023074902,0.00017725705,0.0009843468,0.0011462364,0.0006602765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813616,0.000825933,0.00018506258,0.00038366803,0.00029434034,0.00017483316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048218966,0.00038874702,0.00039609402,0.0009529564,0.0042424835,0.004930105,0.0007046088,0.003924762,0.003704202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004868066,0.0002502068,0.00053060456,0.00061246735,0.043661486,0.008248641,0.003697273,0.005760096,0.00071109855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015053728,0.0000012333124,0.00001334327,0.0000024220794,4.9292777e-7,0.000004226644,0.00021715772,0.000027459071,0.000013981439,0.99888426,0.00031974044,0.000514331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004584904,0.000005203599,0.00007794297,0.00001617546,0.0000014698211,0.000020571724,0.000124277,0.000108779896,0.00006302185,0.98203456,0.017538583,0.0000048555357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037689395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028573587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006061939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006061939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038126337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043982685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238894806","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.687","title":"CONSUMER CREDIT REDUX","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Government (linguistics); Economic interventionism; Economics; Political science; Consumer protection; Law and economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.011608491887110479,"score_gpt":0.24810062710047245,"score_spread":0.236492135213362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238894806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0082386015,0.010343552,0.0007493227,0.10640511,0.0058226474,0.00008048282,0.0006832841,0.00029104657,0.8673859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054840494,0.0032361897,0.0003982833,0.020496355,0.0019548277,0.000050982588,0.00024630976,0.0000888225,0.9186877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820197,0.00018512121,0.00005413327,0.00039225572,0.0008753114,0.00029116045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975,0.00066459883,0.000120666184,0.00031074678,0.00089844107,0.00050551334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016625458,0.0003380094,0.00029861738,0.00094376,0.004667492,0.007185629,0.0007786286,0.005950454,0.07674676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074387197,0.00030149118,0.0002970225,0.001009272,0.002584743,0.0027998884,0.0024050602,0.004951295,0.0094313305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003302769,0.000018739487,0.0010280445,0.00007341236,0.0000037288164,0.0002392543,0.0008477033,0.000059518767,0.00016749442,0.27134073,0.6890472,0.03714109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042557162,0.0000062757067,0.000952606,0.00004601305,0.0000015272584,0.000050651055,0.00012873666,0.000044863133,0.00008731126,0.0030996613,0.9955735,0.000004563597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059431367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098833546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07674676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01099505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008437034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2567435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239043492","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.417","title":"DIGNITY, LIBERTY, EQUALITY: A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TRIANGLE OF CONSTITUTIONALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Constitutionalism; Politics; Ideology; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Law; Liberalism; Bill of rights; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Democracy","score_opus":0.028095736643470138,"score_gpt":0.2739936088723604,"score_spread":0.24589787222889026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239043492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024688747,0.048843678,0.06860064,0.5445198,0.0026730148,0.00010980985,0.00016830165,0.00011869268,0.31027728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686818,0.025242172,0.030785883,0.04886012,0.0052197725,0.0003854665,0.00013922593,0.00017445482,0.020511115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98591876,0.007532903,0.0004916545,0.0022470884,0.0026987132,0.0011108448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855247,0.010612847,0.0006953258,0.0013486018,0.0010040996,0.00081444264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014925378,0.0006212708,0.0013685764,0.0023915377,0.0063234065,0.020331627,0.0026291695,0.010783001,0.005410863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013222375,0.0004917085,0.0007423826,0.0026375868,0.09671569,0.034421876,0.01059373,0.025233978,0.0007107533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017589368,0.0000042157453,0.000033412085,0.0000142476265,7.4666315e-7,0.000010177853,0.0009093107,0.000027565091,0.000023297027,0.996974,0.00058487983,0.0014164544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038507483,0.000006858379,0.00008309747,0.00008473012,0.0000011849181,0.00003176846,0.00071215647,0.0001317119,0.000028928767,0.97306395,0.02584506,0.00000670545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043787137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003051996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020331627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005734255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078933895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239310495","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.131212","title":"INTRODUCTION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.00502274955518309,"score_gpt":0.17294804547788886,"score_spread":0.16792529592270578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239310495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012411965,0.0015039126,0.001444809,0.013090091,0.0026134097,0.00010894207,0.0035674942,0.00036561774,0.9760646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010001613,0.0008990844,0.00058552064,0.0032390675,0.00064810767,0.00006478632,0.0014398469,0.00012389668,0.982998],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985221,0.00015835786,0.000037998776,0.0003014559,0.00066160224,0.00031858525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980719,0.00023714975,0.00008147748,0.00023484041,0.0008291158,0.00054545584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011108546,0.00061918824,0.00037967073,0.0014890019,0.003989416,0.0070011695,0.0013884294,0.002441831,0.45000297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037097582,0.00032703666,0.0004573857,0.0016064575,0.0016645485,0.0020612413,0.0025801493,0.0020265,0.18919553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025181766,0.00002096872,0.00053006236,0.00011265694,0.000002247294,0.000056889035,0.0007784115,0.000068902795,0.00014072585,0.114770874,0.83864105,0.04485202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017772894,0.0000036249685,0.00059307576,0.00006257041,0.0000011793862,0.000017165168,0.00026215558,0.000014655523,0.00005047361,0.0024720624,0.9965178,0.0000034720963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13270652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21701238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54999703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009370805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008951012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.784504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239877486","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0067","title":"Editors' Note","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.004713475738712176,"score_gpt":0.2042997986697399,"score_spread":0.19958632293102774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239877486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008648859,0.0033452122,0.00033724573,0.58532923,0.3330626,0.00025556667,0.0009796587,0.00052594184,0.07529962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050126165,0.0012346709,0.00049718627,0.5722637,0.06751095,0.00042941535,0.0001662539,0.00020479059,0.3526804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98656553,0.0008417005,0.00098794,0.0033307779,0.0060679438,0.002206145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754543,0.008608743,0.001244163,0.0016418286,0.010641033,0.002409992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073744874,0.0021071055,0.0038233958,0.0036930458,0.014800772,0.01611081,0.0077343634,0.059088793,0.0855203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05999483,0.0021932567,0.003316088,0.0033849142,0.004617624,0.006068634,0.004640584,0.039461885,0.04946978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116708725,0.000008357294,0.000066497836,0.000026841204,0.000007952114,0.00008381211,0.00008131952,0.000018993209,0.00003826655,0.0020265132,0.996097,0.0015327239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034243363,0.000014644677,0.00071343477,0.00016651371,0.00004414127,0.00005584089,0.00029274833,0.00014393487,0.00022286992,0.0014220503,0.9968464,0.000043129225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08733673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20574799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08733673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013388919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020844266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2860939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239968141","doi":"10.3138/utlj.57.4.795","title":"THE SCOPE AND STRUCTURE OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Economic and Industrial Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Restitution; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.013893773278130768,"score_gpt":0.17752538886686214,"score_spread":0.16363161558873138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239968141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28280318,0.0024454598,0.057922214,0.009730266,0.00006189695,0.00010103942,0.00031352972,0.0001254264,0.646497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390477,0.00019030018,0.0015413455,0.00016710584,0.000035646404,0.000029889423,0.000027536686,0.000019359666,0.0040841256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581146,0.0015725505,0.00022793215,0.0007832162,0.00087351666,0.0007313868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98137283,0.011092986,0.001781347,0.0030229257,0.0017247288,0.001005124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048328787,0.00021487442,0.0009082469,0.002888662,0.003261586,0.0060996716,0.0013515276,0.0026178367,0.010428751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023721503,0.0005243177,0.00044659732,0.002214579,0.02119257,0.009483223,0.0045522857,0.0024083469,0.00038428325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014874621,0.00000677893,0.000762023,0.000009866267,0.0000034006107,0.000016934813,0.0004146073,0.00026328632,0.00004168668,0.9954862,0.0002395517,0.002740716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006964565,0.0000067774313,0.0014936074,0.000023892851,0.0000063363696,0.000029650804,0.000566017,0.0009199747,0.00011727501,0.9939401,0.0028851,0.000004353399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042662714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006417896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010428751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004359407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003480595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03488767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240210251","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0302","title":"INTRODUCTION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Punitive damages; Supreme court; Criminology; Test (biology); Political science; Law; Sexual intercourse; Psychology; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.008082832676914065,"score_gpt":0.2253796253075708,"score_spread":0.21729679263065674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240210251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014187405,0.0027233465,0.0026394948,0.02412611,0.007479549,0.00016595198,0.0038474335,0.00057243253,0.9570269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010707664,0.0021726673,0.0018514862,0.011882023,0.0012240302,0.00009119729,0.002680968,0.0002850697,0.9691049],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799037,0.00017014181,0.00006959975,0.00039164184,0.0009548643,0.0004233612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977543,0.00019158184,0.0000671845,0.00025188457,0.0012294672,0.00050553714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012803039,0.00063691894,0.00048166027,0.0011720943,0.005488366,0.0065414556,0.002306569,0.003425169,0.3610664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043837037,0.0002724381,0.0005377831,0.0015262717,0.0015642368,0.002835799,0.0034528817,0.0023802673,0.16513544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018658928,0.000017189608,0.000602417,0.0000863755,0.000002379735,0.00013189104,0.0006589054,0.000058030033,0.00015746364,0.064561106,0.87301713,0.060688492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010587196,0.000002716196,0.00026847946,0.000041020317,7.4895263e-7,0.000041094438,0.00016576925,0.000013596597,0.00003168777,0.0014379094,0.997993,0.0000029178377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12550212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19082378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6389336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008406583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012378501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9113612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240555861","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.163","title":"ENDING IMPUNITY: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE PROSECUTION OF HEADS OF STATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; State (computer science); Law; Mandate; Political science; Politics; Rule of law; Accountability; Premise; Economic Justice; Transitional justice; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08930135471851057,"score_gpt":0.31760099509362677,"score_spread":0.2282996403751162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240555861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014566569,0.21986218,0.0023873148,0.68686616,0.009119626,0.00005380538,0.000034005836,0.000024744324,0.067085534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55849373,0.16302928,0.0016284712,0.24111567,0.013835225,0.00021911309,0.000042873784,0.00010540017,0.021530287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98323625,0.011569541,0.00056448736,0.001030683,0.0016270725,0.0019718711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94208324,0.05247239,0.001653282,0.0004569078,0.0023219043,0.0010122693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023913203,0.0006984899,0.0010741159,0.0038296408,0.018489106,0.018435838,0.004264088,0.020875188,0.0016499159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035113823,0.00062765385,0.0006700462,0.0042493944,0.0651488,0.016406741,0.006247109,0.01971664,0.00038390578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020429236,0.000019509931,0.00040009778,0.00036840775,0.000010013196,0.0009001823,0.15587895,0.00011133861,0.00012075093,0.7530209,0.07688428,0.012265178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012721476,0.00004809348,0.0009755877,0.0025293697,0.000016818762,0.0005857745,0.21162878,0.00015026842,0.00038307044,0.10332863,0.68029594,0.000044956574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02809133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045588266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02809133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019343652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015814256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14034867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240900943","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.177","title":"PREFERENCE, PLURALISM, AND PROPORTIONALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023434782033723903,"score_gpt":0.17786960044065103,"score_spread":0.15443481840692713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240900943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09132369,0.009110309,0.14389497,0.04967421,0.0009981765,0.000099974706,0.00007809053,0.00007497627,0.7047456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660763,0.0011886379,0.010334677,0.0019655575,0.000510077,0.00007372138,0.00002093251,0.000034817665,0.0197952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878946,0.007103936,0.00038645105,0.0011439961,0.0026714175,0.00079953007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263316,0.0044338694,0.0006749939,0.0007988054,0.0008804462,0.0005786679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009619659,0.000419105,0.00065616204,0.0011798234,0.0041176714,0.0055281087,0.0008437908,0.0017393758,0.004521303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016046401,0.00032800023,0.0006370652,0.0016819839,0.022376867,0.0077099996,0.0042131385,0.0035615137,0.00042234542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008705956,0.000007873162,0.00009229936,0.000013188788,0.000004766205,0.000024667757,0.0007123124,0.00023272779,0.000035268946,0.99414223,0.00086338294,0.0038626762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064238807,0.000005732167,0.000088617475,0.000010173439,0.000002149167,0.000027518048,0.00020507573,0.00029729045,0.000027111786,0.99133563,0.007990304,0.0000038179473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032428196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002844109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009619659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040753675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020442652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050874174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241341417","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.545","title":"MIND THE GAP: CANADA'S DIFFERENT CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS OF FAULT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Fault (geology); Criminal procedure; Section (typography); Ambivalence; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.037307828059278375,"score_gpt":0.25725847926338236,"score_spread":0.21995065120410398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241341417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22226185,0.012215174,0.010539833,0.24795054,0.0010605286,0.00012196734,0.0010179112,0.00016113945,0.504671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685125,0.0015322542,0.0024168561,0.014188182,0.000088602756,0.000024189658,0.00013290643,0.00003705568,0.013067581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788305,0.0018577426,0.0005538644,0.0013762191,0.013189691,0.0041919346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820801,0.004621081,0.0008839748,0.0008226274,0.00899952,0.0025926712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008285096,0.00024194107,0.00053421094,0.002973525,0.014379774,0.014046659,0.0026417081,0.0037389747,0.0027802638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026302893,0.0003220844,0.0005111334,0.0031823262,0.015894312,0.0042491867,0.0037983258,0.0073538627,0.00012908205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002625879,0.000014914566,0.004086175,0.00005561006,0.000014716872,0.00009979101,0.0072121075,0.00061519427,0.00020925203,0.9581921,0.013258425,0.016215391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012100122,0.000119367956,0.08640598,0.0013040396,0.00018508588,0.00030390127,0.043314677,0.0031218727,0.0021558471,0.31385067,0.5486208,0.00049676496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99000776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8638762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1361238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2134567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98765194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241675747","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.239","title":"REGIONAL COMPETITION LAW AGREEMENTS: AN IMPORTANT STEP FOR ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Externality; Competition law; Competition (biology); Business; Law and economics; Structuring; Law enforcement; Face (sociological concept); International trade; Economics; Member states; Pareto principle; Industrial organization; Public economics; Law; Political science; European union; Microeconomics; Operations management","score_opus":0.02003147405143842,"score_gpt":0.21157537182185143,"score_spread":0.191543897770413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241675747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025915127,0.012692943,0.15246914,0.3133101,0.0015240504,0.00011990128,0.000071335286,0.00029072267,0.49360666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87403595,0.0049629523,0.053730343,0.02914721,0.0014707365,0.00015494642,0.00006153123,0.00015839154,0.036278103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900025,0.0040865513,0.00033238798,0.001128883,0.0030851925,0.0013644655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909932,0.004099324,0.0011343154,0.0012453599,0.0015916761,0.0009360712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010191343,0.00045233764,0.000828003,0.00085731636,0.004731402,0.010483085,0.0018207037,0.009969944,0.0052510416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017775845,0.00045954526,0.0010771387,0.0013181368,0.014660327,0.012771212,0.0052778358,0.0113689955,0.0013106021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026937928,0.000004167773,0.000096185715,0.000013225592,0.0000039289207,0.00003751111,0.0003115074,0.00052796584,0.0000732377,0.99204177,0.0031200885,0.003767779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015085455,0.000026110907,0.00044037122,0.00019593212,0.0000138666965,0.000117879164,0.0008151049,0.0014743465,0.00028825464,0.8558679,0.14071701,0.000028183498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013865135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01358399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013865135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073569682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013891349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05389756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243079077","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.241","title":"THE IDEA OF CONSIDERATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Doctrine; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Epistemology; Control (management); Contrast (vision); Legal doctrine; Law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03285581476177582,"score_gpt":0.2494688006652572,"score_spread":0.21661298590348138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243079077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021628259,0.005958798,0.20835502,0.05445943,0.0013392068,0.00018527439,0.00011966423,0.00015738404,0.70779693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91004074,0.0016903959,0.026650881,0.011243005,0.0011030731,0.00047108522,0.00007115739,0.0001735069,0.04855617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827172,0.007416972,0.00065608224,0.0034499196,0.004392314,0.0013675708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98950034,0.0050565843,0.0009973974,0.0024395876,0.001196174,0.00080986903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012931424,0.00054533716,0.00093635014,0.0018159653,0.007199982,0.009827179,0.0026256996,0.0061233323,0.0065131094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587377,0.0006356085,0.0013060228,0.0018114961,0.06089709,0.014553239,0.009587661,0.009434066,0.0009798935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021063802,0.0000013717448,0.000034550136,0.0000056430863,0.0000012476843,0.000005733697,0.0003602647,0.000019782752,0.000018992258,0.99826765,0.0003287546,0.0009538762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006776869,0.000017241427,0.000071711074,0.00005153867,0.0000073025267,0.0000530928,0.00031190325,0.00019629403,0.00008781475,0.949112,0.050074853,0.000009556854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048946454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038224729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012931424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065438203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00845022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0683887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243377217","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.289","title":"BEYOND THE COUNTERTRADE TABOO: WHY THE WTO SHOULD TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT BARTER AND COUNTERTRADE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Barter; Cronyism; Currency; Economics; International economics; Order (exchange); International trade; Transaction cost; Business; Monetary economics; Law; Market economy; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.014392428692588275,"score_gpt":0.1897680677407137,"score_spread":0.17537563904812542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243377217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07508834,0.02935543,0.019115638,0.6918822,0.0025689125,0.00003315551,0.00011506448,0.00008113922,0.1817601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92589206,0.010948404,0.0035594772,0.037090156,0.0023235877,0.00003061548,0.00003974104,0.00012626473,0.019989636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972663,0.0012032073,0.000098096076,0.00030168094,0.0007550008,0.0003756738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934861,0.0034847625,0.000756274,0.0008014452,0.0011058152,0.00036556163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057755187,0.00030157343,0.0004945792,0.0007268292,0.003539147,0.009241016,0.0009538125,0.0063582812,0.0034800444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015070455,0.00024106196,0.00032729897,0.0013044148,0.027338617,0.012950939,0.0020379412,0.008653761,0.0006229215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020776117,0.000008117552,0.00059115456,0.000023595429,0.000003656248,0.00007453246,0.0015402037,0.00027903583,0.000105015635,0.97971183,0.010374936,0.007267155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020926622,0.000019502299,0.002084021,0.00025267966,0.0000068321488,0.00014276592,0.0036644328,0.001056359,0.0002996373,0.86706865,0.12535241,0.00003177882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016799662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01913149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016799662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050560217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003987272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036684215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243583015","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.251","title":"IN SEARCH OF ‘BORA'S HEAD’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Head (geology); Geology; Political science; Paleontology","score_opus":0.024312292420346333,"score_gpt":0.21923113901315497,"score_spread":0.19491884659280864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243583015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029993441,0.0028123115,0.0019633735,0.124271214,0.006434057,0.000047107278,0.00011360061,0.00014954752,0.8342154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35888398,0.0005939066,0.00086190895,0.039515063,0.0009494875,0.000025462094,0.00004417677,0.00024399975,0.598882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985796,0.00036445583,0.000050205115,0.00022174978,0.00021202781,0.0005719016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991222,0.00019367524,0.000082306484,0.00010277474,0.00023714904,0.00026195362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013908056,0.0003173484,0.0003357569,0.00062532845,0.020682808,0.0063343006,0.0010137144,0.004984504,0.040061165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004316544,0.00037205574,0.00022049133,0.00063177344,0.011808134,0.0034767718,0.003346259,0.006915696,0.0070008775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004386598,0.000009585821,0.00079208025,0.00004869438,0.00000445814,0.0006081149,0.052712828,0.000024819285,0.00039110263,0.64866775,0.28372118,0.012975616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000650064,0.000008499294,0.00073568465,0.000058864283,0.0000046162295,0.000201984,0.01958827,0.000027640435,0.00019475436,0.009651776,0.9695072,0.000014297338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093295574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29635936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093295574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070954673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073350933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18550509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243814312","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.263","title":"BILATERALISM VERSUS MULTILATERALISM IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW: APPLYING THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bilateralism; Subsidiarity; Multilateralism; Political science; Law and economics; Federalist; Government (linguistics); International law; Economics; Politics; Public administration; Law; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.014386067779344968,"score_gpt":0.23321075993873608,"score_spread":0.2188246921593911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243814312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035319954,0.004954594,0.20183356,0.04280397,0.0005991299,0.00011979804,0.000059292674,0.000071194925,0.71423846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971185,0.0015805184,0.01461487,0.0024534343,0.00033871553,0.00013412259,0.0000183665,0.000041979954,0.0096328985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222034,0.0039523086,0.00028617596,0.00071571773,0.0019901714,0.0008352388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970457,0.001734625,0.0003075753,0.00040240565,0.0003553994,0.00015426455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062415516,0.00032812252,0.00053116627,0.0011352365,0.004105942,0.008325828,0.0010575086,0.0040436178,0.0026623518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010247974,0.0004161127,0.000535547,0.0014301627,0.027487168,0.008265299,0.005091599,0.0055611287,0.00029270566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.116597e-7,6.7418864e-7,0.000021181215,0.0000022888694,4.1464156e-7,0.000006758215,0.00017101888,0.00007157139,0.000008489993,0.9991736,0.00010688053,0.0004363931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000996676,0.000006933094,0.00017358625,0.00004608104,0.000003633286,0.00003512303,0.00031800618,0.0006850884,0.00006420658,0.9800949,0.018556306,0.000006155141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012399237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010604179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012399237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010652873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073962514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07729232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243929112","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.dagan","title":"INSIDE PROPERTY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Autonomy; Property rights; Property law; Tangible property; Corporate governance; Business; Public property; Interpersonal communication; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025693669923225436,"score_gpt":0.2590236299858315,"score_spread":0.23332996006260606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243929112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004908596,0.002060707,0.020824151,0.0077292915,0.00056511635,0.000060530696,0.00018998764,0.0002291258,0.96343255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4796472,0.0027795848,0.010306603,0.01086077,0.0013076445,0.00020122537,0.0004454407,0.00050334487,0.49394822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387497,0.001298984,0.00030147503,0.001690455,0.0019766702,0.00085735024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653804,0.00091659755,0.000299776,0.0012786826,0.0007178077,0.00024924747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033791116,0.0005946618,0.00062303373,0.001311227,0.0063509773,0.010552959,0.0015269193,0.004956605,0.036059678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006089375,0.00047893028,0.00089750055,0.00093871105,0.017111706,0.010773219,0.0056536137,0.0046864334,0.006647933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036471442,0.000003172909,0.00012097061,0.000021195085,0.0000027643744,0.000066850414,0.0014470709,0.00005548329,0.00007185887,0.9873646,0.0061781383,0.0046642907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054431816,0.00002174233,0.00045175644,0.00017548124,0.000016725313,0.00021471316,0.0010410249,0.00022937174,0.0004317701,0.24245797,0.7549321,0.000021801421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027393585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021427894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059957244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049897474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120631635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244513941","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0088","title":"The law of strangers: The form and substance of other-regarding international adjudication","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Accountability; Political science; Sovereignty; Globalization; Law; Jurisprudence; Settlement (finance); International law; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.010891590445995207,"score_gpt":0.23700090764014323,"score_spread":0.226109317194148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244513941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11349054,0.0059595136,0.08732944,0.05151877,0.0010359025,0.00015933996,0.00006922643,0.00013819555,0.7402991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98434955,0.00088896457,0.0026296945,0.002557208,0.00025991394,0.000042650812,0.00001677573,0.00005129497,0.009203987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9644895,0.02097133,0.0015420192,0.0040334323,0.006445649,0.0025180408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683917,0.018606786,0.0028276455,0.0053038183,0.003573852,0.0012962385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021843167,0.00035408628,0.00066590065,0.001452975,0.011985942,0.0198466,0.0024258578,0.006808206,0.0025424215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038677115,0.00058481743,0.00056010316,0.001836608,0.08604284,0.009937872,0.008694218,0.008853144,0.00037980362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005037147,0.000003248776,0.00036989574,0.000013753095,0.0000043725313,0.00014173563,0.01599154,0.000111874746,0.000091175156,0.9785018,0.0010210257,0.0037444734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027134683,0.000040704203,0.0024816822,0.00051019684,0.00006377117,0.0004312277,0.027445551,0.0018838618,0.0008285032,0.80197644,0.1642263,0.00008450322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0470385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04332311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0470385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011732276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0120940255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11551911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245190038","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.867","title":"CONSTITUTIONALIZING SELF-DEFENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Self defense; Law; Criminal code; Supreme court; Political science; Criminal law; Dignity; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03859207213984661,"score_gpt":0.19711780775754367,"score_spread":0.15852573561769706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245190038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052277595,0.0023578058,0.040456876,0.04230204,0.0007542345,0.00019625571,0.00033500599,0.00021383839,0.86110634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95114034,0.00055511185,0.005514314,0.008682222,0.00018831695,0.00012315207,0.00010399057,0.00007119134,0.03362126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859232,0.0026155806,0.0005679057,0.0025359408,0.005174651,0.0031827667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934644,0.0029913732,0.00047793938,0.0020654355,0.004200095,0.0009188665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013459592,0.0005908042,0.0006270297,0.0015928919,0.010603734,0.010561426,0.0027264953,0.007190053,0.004874395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019898342,0.0004505079,0.0007426819,0.0010773162,0.052818723,0.004496561,0.0061761057,0.009553857,0.00055725855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019311453,0.0000020057767,0.0001084095,0.0000054625657,0.0000019241302,0.000017261375,0.0008709951,0.000077600125,0.00006759371,0.99686736,0.0009946952,0.0009848146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003361609,0.00003372404,0.0019673451,0.00027251517,0.000042568943,0.00012347747,0.0024005556,0.0010922772,0.0012546653,0.78696936,0.20572482,0.000085065694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5976448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59991705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5976448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042741623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.076480165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8094495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245544978","doi":"10.3138/utlj.57.4.781","title":"THE ROLE OF EMOTIONS IN THE RULE OF LAW","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.008709613143756954,"score_gpt":0.238056225269696,"score_spread":0.22934661212593904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245544978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35925108,0.0032998298,0.004217054,0.030781008,0.00020687211,0.000031682895,0.00007264172,0.000023266675,0.60211664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964295,0.00024661038,0.00013896303,0.00031627738,0.000028315588,0.0000057671296,0.0000037034797,0.000007667168,0.002823262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711406,0.0016910706,0.00006866991,0.00025041946,0.0003963929,0.00047929387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99017847,0.006752275,0.00082166714,0.00047016423,0.00081374374,0.00096359855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031078188,0.00019492574,0.00034349464,0.0007303172,0.0042735916,0.0113801975,0.0008942113,0.002730171,0.005760629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012307501,0.00029914,0.00023552938,0.00067022693,0.038080182,0.0040700487,0.0024527188,0.0028386372,0.00027688686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010227793,0.000064490145,0.0053744502,0.000076169774,0.000023294404,0.000383719,0.072107024,0.0007860251,0.0004999814,0.9053361,0.0035188082,0.011727644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091728514,0.000055793214,0.037350833,0.00016293112,0.000043454867,0.00016681259,0.06608176,0.002097606,0.00052148156,0.84492195,0.048432857,0.0000729184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06606945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056630578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06606945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064898683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00470013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13136977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245566518","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.469","title":"CANADA'S THIRD NATIONAL POLICY: THE EPIPHENOMENAL OR THE REAL CONSTITUTION?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Political science; National Policy; Public administration; State (computer science); Law; Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.012829605554604516,"score_gpt":0.24844310949393947,"score_spread":0.23561350393933495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245566518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049222577,0.009451225,0.009250646,0.28796414,0.0009397573,0.00007316216,0.0005521488,0.00015789364,0.64238834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94068414,0.004407478,0.0038220724,0.015745388,0.00015675621,0.00006907888,0.00016634242,0.00008457226,0.034864087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402606,0.0008240367,0.0000857252,0.00064500934,0.0022665453,0.002152648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727637,0.0005945778,0.00015662477,0.0003064266,0.00096761185,0.0006985117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035183611,0.00033592177,0.00052979094,0.0015078592,0.01843872,0.015248571,0.0018709225,0.0031139308,0.00405907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007296966,0.0003000946,0.00036657468,0.0030941425,0.046568137,0.0060074413,0.003378516,0.006308844,0.00027868673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045460124,0.0000040629193,0.0005175852,0.000018834611,0.000003824499,0.000041114374,0.004169758,0.00013544688,0.000040748033,0.98152643,0.008771176,0.0047664884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001908728,0.000011228229,0.0063121133,0.00056114304,0.000033427925,0.00009349834,0.020869728,0.0011340245,0.00035201642,0.3788989,0.5916431,0.00007177838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.979226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98192894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17773838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17773838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29856828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9537069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245605678","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.255","title":"The Logic of Planning and the Aim of the Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Equivocation; Legal positivism; Order (exchange); Positivism; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Legal profession; Economics","score_opus":0.01463502003074349,"score_gpt":0.24117583763820172,"score_spread":0.22654081760745823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245605678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009134968,0.00878733,0.11354851,0.08027922,0.00062828127,0.00006000046,0.00021784689,0.0002025769,0.7871412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89954317,0.005382508,0.028901296,0.0075207534,0.0006304151,0.0002610384,0.00014615638,0.00016977525,0.05744491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583495,0.0021111597,0.00013203266,0.0005004183,0.0009103669,0.00051109126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967782,0.0019708604,0.0002371147,0.00034861645,0.0004014055,0.00026387678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052921544,0.00055253186,0.00041424859,0.0013954731,0.005398716,0.010772452,0.0013562145,0.0033014007,0.006632996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061213216,0.000571733,0.0006557454,0.0016290125,0.04617013,0.010877596,0.0037386087,0.0058475095,0.001262799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023197333,0.0000011681228,0.000024083382,0.000005937504,8.776388e-7,0.000008088577,0.00028477536,0.000093131144,0.0000075916914,0.9976738,0.0009731439,0.0009250352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075046237,0.0000042613906,0.00005711278,0.000037202717,0.0000024222484,0.000015729354,0.00031236227,0.00026175793,0.00006370219,0.9640693,0.03516369,0.000004949885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013414566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012677465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013414566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091416305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01092036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06632745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246449393","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.783","title":"CITIZENSHIP REVOCATION AS PUNISHMENT: ON THE MODERN DUTIES OF CITIZENS AND THEIR CRIMINAL BREACH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Citizenship; Law; Duty; Political science; Punishment (psychology); State (computer science); Polity; Punitive damages; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04046815951217862,"score_gpt":0.2348403605115367,"score_spread":0.1943722009993581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246449393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088188216,0.0104270205,0.013086704,0.09868431,0.00074705086,0.00005250756,0.00002024258,0.000038655144,0.78875536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97945,0.002204314,0.00070826785,0.0047068433,0.00036625675,0.000030442281,0.0000054219336,0.000023131897,0.012505367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99166214,0.0050815186,0.00023906678,0.0006557684,0.0009809867,0.0013805353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921747,0.0046718135,0.001103689,0.0009855313,0.0006559568,0.0004082933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006201351,0.0003197933,0.0004862686,0.0011817389,0.0075642006,0.010558053,0.0013967223,0.009034224,0.003443537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008664379,0.00032377895,0.00036818522,0.0009850909,0.110361435,0.009407674,0.0069119544,0.008258399,0.00041125683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000354756,0.0000056011545,0.00010764735,0.0000075199246,6.5670656e-7,0.000021626538,0.0015464489,0.00005779299,0.000013388901,0.99663275,0.0005456174,0.0010574034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018256345,0.00003482934,0.0012722635,0.00025000807,0.000007611096,0.00012910803,0.005484993,0.0006142631,0.00017037903,0.9178447,0.07414774,0.000025770902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010656814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019357868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011553917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011553917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00755923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08382988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246612561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.405","title":"JUDICIAL POLITICS IN AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Dialectic; Rule of law; Law; Constraint (computer-aided design); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Law and economics; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Adjudication; Independence (probability theory); Sociology; Democracy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015423808318879165,"score_gpt":0.2529957120198597,"score_spread":0.23757190370098055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246612561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0924921,0.045581188,0.014054775,0.021585392,0.0004576091,0.000049857073,0.000043056036,0.000036671154,0.8256994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97419554,0.010146984,0.0010912953,0.001753086,0.0005925404,0.000043389,0.000018202092,0.000014552552,0.012144401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927199,0.0035342914,0.00033430912,0.0007004791,0.0015250022,0.0011860593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523854,0.003068883,0.00075318187,0.00038220102,0.00034260508,0.00021463941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004744103,0.00019532705,0.00046145407,0.0015674812,0.0049412055,0.008493627,0.00095549796,0.0035423941,0.0025030917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006261417,0.00036145942,0.00029697065,0.0022456048,0.021867117,0.0038335812,0.003076152,0.0032871566,0.00034370314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017354433,0.0000036533022,0.0001281695,0.000024711737,0.0000014563867,0.000043399163,0.0019662837,0.00011866182,0.0000547206,0.99506396,0.0004946351,0.0020985855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027696322,0.000033413366,0.003352865,0.00053805363,0.000011762475,0.0003783868,0.0059430413,0.00063561846,0.000521595,0.72320265,0.2653301,0.000024757335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005180772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073055713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008493627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006325636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034691803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045895875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246713511","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.519","title":"REGULATION AND PUBLIC LAW IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Democracy; Legitimacy; Legislature; Political science; Statute; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.026559781979468653,"score_gpt":0.2704350863892322,"score_spread":0.24387530440976354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246713511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077118855,0.01927131,0.0056812335,0.027082784,0.00026234167,0.000016737993,0.00006113414,0.00003247587,0.93988013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290324,0.01296511,0.002302584,0.0073686372,0.0011256391,0.0001155658,0.00010930808,0.00005837514,0.04692242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943843,0.0031005843,0.00010648648,0.0005376856,0.00092444953,0.00094652025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959966,0.0025428345,0.00027170184,0.00044742136,0.00051596836,0.00022553632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040587205,0.0003264638,0.0006079942,0.0029830884,0.0071064276,0.015790392,0.0012350266,0.0053132763,0.010552679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059121842,0.00031303664,0.0005302853,0.0029775046,0.0410604,0.0068893475,0.003298493,0.004662106,0.0007713204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010047203,0.0000024489523,0.00003158055,0.000008375221,9.0106187e-7,0.00000846595,0.00040060948,0.00006823129,0.000012965761,0.99808997,0.0006520322,0.0007232683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011825775,0.00001940551,0.00087897555,0.00021024635,0.000013433333,0.00008291335,0.0026705554,0.0004015353,0.00017034097,0.69299376,0.30253512,0.000011768621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031652622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03010659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031652622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026389556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007628073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1914705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246890151","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.317","title":"THE VERTICAL RESTRAINTS PARADOX: JUSTIFYING THE DIFFERENT LEGAL TREATMENT OF PRICE AND NON-PRICE VERTICAL RESTRAINTS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031081620689989327,"score_gpt":0.20533742162380983,"score_spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246890151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09965426,0.005883127,0.1683787,0.116507374,0.0015208668,0.00012794866,0.00029910737,0.0002512087,0.6073775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491246,0.0018408427,0.014563633,0.0134080835,0.0013519876,0.00018565594,0.00009400728,0.00013376147,0.019297507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914056,0.0022203824,0.0005010965,0.0011831326,0.0037002438,0.0009895832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98867875,0.0063761636,0.0013097427,0.0017649079,0.0014379681,0.0004323748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077070817,0.0005881562,0.00094138726,0.0018555411,0.0034180295,0.007548967,0.0039044172,0.011462274,0.004938011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020138977,0.00059321465,0.001760309,0.001350666,0.02416508,0.01179525,0.0055586374,0.0134921195,0.00092721847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026043374,0.0000038931876,0.000040568648,0.000006703681,0.000001660178,0.000031942276,0.00008193505,0.00009835592,0.000041760777,0.99870145,0.00044692442,0.00054208183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024578081,0.000008962248,0.00017583474,0.000056492747,0.000005975795,0.00005357463,0.00013553275,0.0017915278,0.00014740226,0.9892687,0.008317489,0.000013985949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061126826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011462274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048310603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040759385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246970930","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.277","title":"Why Compare? Comments on Kevin Jon Heller and Markus D Dubber’s <i>The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Comparative law; Political science","score_opus":0.05438337534974762,"score_gpt":0.3075949605492642,"score_spread":0.2532115851995166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246970930","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010565001,0.005508289,0.00015078243,0.9737607,0.01830467,0.000008865561,0.000050413302,0.000026049009,0.0020846212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00300766,0.005673098,0.0006048912,0.9539957,0.021219218,0.00007129454,0.00006552608,0.00012080583,0.015241919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921017,0.003161722,0.00062574097,0.0010087811,0.002709083,0.00039293666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94857144,0.033293713,0.002461315,0.00090378703,0.013105836,0.0016640404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014634685,0.0012779813,0.0014254067,0.002164282,0.0064977338,0.0071587204,0.0045556985,0.013156395,0.013221527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08375643,0.0008131454,0.00081116724,0.0042623696,0.006283078,0.014445965,0.003920069,0.017364334,0.007594123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004772922,0.0000026336588,0.00004790741,0.000041045434,0.0000013652497,0.000023397179,0.00035033267,0.000011560173,0.00001034762,0.0032910304,0.9942736,0.0019420339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008433943,0.000009575922,0.00039081575,0.00045151004,0.0000058131773,0.000093957824,0.0020979336,0.00006244596,0.00009454188,0.0062014265,0.99055254,0.000031016076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022603162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039565876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022603162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005096708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00609649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07739651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246999568","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.731","title":"MISFEASANCE AS AN ORGANIZING NORMATIVE IDEA IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Tort; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Meaning (existential); Private law; Relation (database); Liability; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.011420385509152866,"score_gpt":0.2647944649778695,"score_spread":0.25337407946871665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246999568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17068999,0.0031266331,0.33494613,0.045148127,0.00042504186,0.0001718612,0.0001365665,0.00027157497,0.44508407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98070496,0.0003578172,0.0117925275,0.00094153895,0.00017723905,0.00010471616,0.000028953824,0.0000584711,0.005833737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884885,0.0049862172,0.00048190076,0.0022167454,0.002783205,0.001043361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309903,0.003392798,0.0005956757,0.0018520073,0.00073507684,0.00032537902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010248733,0.0005014416,0.000768769,0.0017246577,0.006088968,0.01219361,0.0017287849,0.005857986,0.0020718833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009776427,0.00058489206,0.0008415066,0.001009333,0.07533157,0.018965062,0.006245576,0.0060299747,0.00031584824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014929122,0.0000027783544,0.0000364075,0.000003000447,7.221807e-7,0.000012182607,0.0006758649,0.00009641229,0.000036419275,0.99865806,0.00006889001,0.0004078396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037790255,0.0000050372614,0.000070622664,0.0000125526085,0.0000017246846,0.00002433048,0.00042752482,0.00042198887,0.00011583745,0.9940057,0.004904937,0.0000059477707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024126181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017454844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01219361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074993744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004735845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054412067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247183412","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.201","title":"Recent Developments in WTO Jurisprudence: Has the Appellate Body Resolved the Issue of an Appropriate Standard of Review in SPS Cases?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of review; Deference; Context (archaeology); Flexibility (engineering); Jurisprudence; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Balance (ability); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Judicial review; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.02427028833850085,"score_gpt":0.28137912274520366,"score_spread":0.2571088344067028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247183412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020138526,0.032026265,0.02293667,0.7745905,0.0048992913,0.00010981874,0.00011423231,0.00013877903,0.14504598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52174604,0.018847868,0.02350717,0.3934412,0.014624852,0.00045721757,0.00019326108,0.0002614229,0.026920961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86614597,0.051348675,0.013551837,0.01733792,0.044860117,0.006755613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69184935,0.22588156,0.018890092,0.016281469,0.03933628,0.007761157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17180626,0.0006209032,0.0015854344,0.0033314184,0.012520577,0.02542336,0.0069665564,0.05397187,0.0032243961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26414567,0.0020357536,0.002324248,0.0048563457,0.042191092,0.019254219,0.008674587,0.036599156,0.0011715613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019224857,0.000032128497,0.0007003836,0.00022803197,0.000019902194,0.00045860102,0.0035361778,0.00044978553,0.00029348937,0.9590125,0.021748062,0.01350178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008128681,0.0001118216,0.0038533136,0.0023705019,0.000066742316,0.00094260764,0.0030591397,0.002416417,0.0008662988,0.36826533,0.6177639,0.00020263132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028752025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022530746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17180626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020342752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033300623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9086092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247679508","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.02","title":"The Society of Property","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Normative; Scope (computer science); Object (grammar); Business; Transaction cost; Freedom of contract; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021958059277297663,"score_gpt":0.25504533425970555,"score_spread":0.2330872749824079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247679508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066130958,0.011037682,0.011373404,0.05177631,0.0011952759,0.000033703036,0.00015799106,0.0001576873,0.91765475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6244008,0.013791813,0.0063330247,0.015337483,0.0029510467,0.00022611459,0.00025921667,0.00034593037,0.33635464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955996,0.0018268749,0.00015934111,0.000967217,0.0008064655,0.00064036506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676335,0.00089984504,0.00029542044,0.0011496408,0.00048048384,0.0004111823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031867733,0.0006326392,0.00067327294,0.0013915217,0.0076983636,0.01493707,0.0011908896,0.0048317458,0.025906475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006075158,0.00034956288,0.0006417459,0.0013974865,0.0246744,0.014683972,0.007903944,0.00530274,0.0052399626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040068817,0.0000023824769,0.00006740111,0.000013142872,0.0000024496496,0.000034223147,0.0006966308,0.000046205503,0.00003129467,0.98686415,0.008218425,0.004019756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004700471,0.000010660819,0.00015042404,0.00008530018,0.0000041593457,0.00011529496,0.0006418278,0.00014840311,0.000077789155,0.43986395,0.5588887,0.000008876749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058144936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004125161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025906475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006743431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005584444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08666581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248148381","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.313","title":"LEGAL POSITIVISM AS AN IDEA ABOUT MORALITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Utilitarianism; Legal realism; Law; Directive; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Legal profession","score_opus":0.04242048475938505,"score_gpt":0.3216567940517019,"score_spread":0.27923630929231685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248148381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0154327,0.012839722,0.14503035,0.4795141,0.0027693447,0.00006290026,0.00011221399,0.00014369974,0.34409496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87810344,0.0074131386,0.028465766,0.05009035,0.004683367,0.00035982975,0.00009562778,0.0002331779,0.030555312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913272,0.005351234,0.00027761704,0.0008572134,0.0014427074,0.0007440489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803498,0.014306836,0.0014205636,0.0014315714,0.0015404888,0.0009507417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01908762,0.0006785635,0.0011628784,0.0026440183,0.0051236707,0.012910989,0.003804263,0.008168265,0.007828949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019428745,0.00055238965,0.001187168,0.0017894291,0.071459815,0.02487821,0.00625682,0.014656719,0.0014074048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015422656,0.0000029391645,0.000019209565,0.000008353949,0.0000011372802,0.0000061231162,0.00058315095,0.000027858741,0.000011030126,0.998353,0.0006261475,0.00035948018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003005553,0.0000052742657,0.000030181209,0.000043940418,0.0000013168486,0.000014374645,0.00048310665,0.00015390442,0.000040386116,0.9896634,0.009557629,0.000003396442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023259139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017045245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01908762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007343977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003664471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10094625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248566953","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.511","title":"TREBILCOCK'S HERESY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heresy; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.009960277216154228,"score_gpt":0.25230285097464383,"score_spread":0.2423425737584896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248566953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019251242,0.04582964,0.002621667,0.3816456,0.03142731,0.000042370204,0.00022355614,0.00025647756,0.5360282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046150934,0.017206796,0.0018745251,0.09840772,0.006821284,0.000062380444,0.00008825784,0.00028225034,0.82910585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970763,0.00083984126,0.00006585853,0.00061493495,0.0010259912,0.00037712228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996999,0.00077124283,0.00016377051,0.00023468844,0.0009715499,0.0008597746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002357448,0.00070258544,0.0006335779,0.0012493666,0.009061612,0.0091861095,0.0010431088,0.003928255,0.027789831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008453486,0.00035095363,0.00037744665,0.0010428921,0.006351317,0.0050426046,0.0033984787,0.008270749,0.0076922798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011238876,0.000013607888,0.00012846277,0.00004143925,0.0000035337182,0.00006784597,0.0013404727,0.000026980415,0.000064204774,0.17662622,0.80187815,0.019797858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011240392,0.0000043007617,0.00006997326,0.00005891929,9.579162e-7,0.0000533759,0.00041396313,0.000019177922,0.0000415751,0.0074058827,0.9919264,0.000004328132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039970465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07414191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039970465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077792117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008461835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09296626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248687743","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.1","title":"THE PUZZLE OF MARTIAL LAW","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Martial law; Proclamation; Political science; Comparative law; Politics","score_opus":0.008655443699399041,"score_gpt":0.2413368030932218,"score_spread":0.23268135939382276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248687743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0760983,0.012442936,0.0014696859,0.25817603,0.0009064422,0.000013609351,0.0000760206,0.00003915038,0.65077794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94066936,0.0027875372,0.00035430383,0.01269654,0.0007026006,0.000009649874,0.000024919642,0.000021114001,0.042733904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843127,0.00041851873,0.000027679407,0.0002303934,0.0004174162,0.0004746529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858046,0.0005759361,0.000115513445,0.0001431679,0.00020965993,0.00037529544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232284,0.00017010256,0.00029988325,0.0005555792,0.01254596,0.008560916,0.00093770586,0.004493981,0.005957911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055202474,0.00026687325,0.00019597531,0.00056707294,0.034818977,0.0060180225,0.0037579853,0.007418777,0.00061086356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004104196,0.000004968124,0.00018572848,0.0000065938457,8.446354e-7,0.000043209304,0.0036391434,0.000040717932,0.00002572153,0.98115313,0.012138874,0.0027570478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011541439,0.000014506003,0.0015487574,0.00013641412,0.0000032033588,0.0001402771,0.009350426,0.00027750168,0.00011904948,0.5424131,0.44596857,0.000016594757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05218375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062008243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05218375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008945438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076950067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103760004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248798288","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.185","title":"TOWARD A STUDY OF THE ECOLOGY OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Political science; Environmentalism; Sociology; Law; Biology; Politics","score_opus":0.017134776734915192,"score_gpt":0.25195240689489146,"score_spread":0.23481763015997625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248798288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52630776,0.009987913,0.009794668,0.062468972,0.00012129731,0.000069465925,0.00076124084,0.000053012605,0.3904357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99342525,0.0012805834,0.00068103045,0.0004943035,0.00005092131,0.000021208909,0.000060206596,0.000020796886,0.0039657727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883753,0.000569718,0.00001802399,0.00015126086,0.00014938274,0.00027406367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406815,0.0033910146,0.000722406,0.000330717,0.000570415,0.00091733027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014177279,0.00016570395,0.00039577982,0.003021333,0.0037892647,0.009851595,0.0013525732,0.0021368994,0.013875721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084312,0.0003713192,0.00017677632,0.0043844865,0.01730012,0.0076944274,0.0020281186,0.0015003198,0.0007191018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057874182,0.00017683087,0.07190421,0.00012953371,0.00003119364,0.00018632658,0.01735584,0.0013747307,0.00050348445,0.8622095,0.0071863313,0.03888416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004349091,0.00008072696,0.21655269,0.00034612924,0.000029927602,0.00024856933,0.114855394,0.0057558045,0.00043782446,0.56885153,0.09276257,0.00003544885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08988691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17344883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08988691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008630442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00586617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17872739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249523082","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.893","title":"INVESTMENT RULES AND THE DENIAL OF CHANGE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Law; Liberalism; Rule of law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.017559733650854063,"score_gpt":0.1950726318927486,"score_spread":0.17751289824189453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249523082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017791132,0.013833182,0.034164768,0.104537226,0.0018940493,0.00007814418,0.00011856913,0.00015259915,0.8274304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89433223,0.0052940804,0.0081091095,0.021142974,0.0015173479,0.00031967025,0.00014678344,0.00017128054,0.06896655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875931,0.0052374164,0.0006145528,0.0024521179,0.0027901244,0.0013126767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957054,0.0025039203,0.0003142994,0.000917274,0.00038599104,0.00017307705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010580877,0.00052617956,0.0006803734,0.0013321248,0.005001708,0.01125137,0.0015916032,0.004953548,0.004425623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011696763,0.0004170034,0.00070597586,0.0011934356,0.062265385,0.0140875485,0.0064977743,0.008731782,0.0008409574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7071385e-7,9.311244e-7,0.000012483532,0.0000028657194,6.9554346e-7,0.0000041113394,0.00026188252,0.000034858247,0.0000069755324,0.9984433,0.0005288122,0.0007021753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067339142,0.0000037601462,0.00004305074,0.000028181767,0.0000017051157,0.000014345736,0.00022958609,0.00009088367,0.000053013337,0.9475668,0.051957045,0.0000050015483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004696194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024123015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008412719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052052774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06103885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249874612","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.439","title":"Future(s) of American Legal History","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Critical legal studies; Scholarship; Narrative; Legal history; Legal culture; Elite; Rhetorical question; Legal realism; Political science; Legal profession; History; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011899754422835447,"score_gpt":0.23535662559417084,"score_spread":0.2234568711713354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249874612","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005303923,0.30068836,0.0009895735,0.47429892,0.013161606,0.000012840292,0.00010979758,0.00005135705,0.20538372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35368076,0.45929104,0.0031701443,0.08247789,0.027149813,0.00012599409,0.00016301606,0.000086623295,0.073854744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888057,0.0005159678,0.000032196116,0.00014066025,0.00027901056,0.00015170395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971559,0.0012017887,0.00017877428,0.00025436564,0.00057207607,0.00063699426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031520845,0.0002872416,0.00039260316,0.002171434,0.0056824195,0.011860557,0.0007244342,0.0043482473,0.0148241455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036879752,0.00019344894,0.00026276615,0.0026136418,0.012759673,0.012854378,0.0020782156,0.004246367,0.0014987491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017236554,0.000026275791,0.0004147435,0.00031004756,0.0000054372504,0.000042759373,0.0042553735,0.000054532575,0.00013160745,0.7234626,0.14532109,0.12595826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016327872,0.0000062436957,0.0003872402,0.0003951903,0.0000029486214,0.000035277102,0.0022811794,0.00003992539,0.000024752864,0.07231975,0.92449963,0.000006179152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012080645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020878207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0148241455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007383386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010407082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05357051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249882619","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.i","title":"<scp>editors' note</scp>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.017834647115386404,"score_gpt":0.23352937344884037,"score_spread":0.21569472633345396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249882619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044511718,0.0026109745,0.0003373319,0.51745594,0.45182878,0.00016017695,0.0014663625,0.000444454,0.02525083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060570594,0.002599195,0.0009252575,0.45528272,0.42763266,0.00035295286,0.00042972493,0.00020854529,0.106511876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882903,0.00097499526,0.0015777498,0.001504283,0.0063145123,0.0013380527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9031613,0.03136325,0.0031945219,0.0049671475,0.05282002,0.0044937497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007313311,0.0015883641,0.0035695203,0.0065514073,0.009519476,0.009737056,0.0063605653,0.03345581,0.046851832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07223765,0.0017952013,0.0028227202,0.0061075804,0.005599345,0.00421866,0.003228925,0.024714997,0.026927663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007927344,0.0000031923882,0.00005957052,0.000037392503,0.00000471965,0.000055957164,0.00003007981,0.000012222593,0.000022450173,0.00037750957,0.99820495,0.0011838999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004435063,0.0000095341875,0.0023602024,0.00032210414,0.00006292816,0.00015727473,0.0003069743,0.00030113765,0.00024070665,0.0015940667,0.9945528,0.000047991114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14737983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39438158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14737983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011819072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015513506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2930439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249935794","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.381","title":"FREEDOM, LAW, AND NAKED VIOLENCE: A REPLY TO KRAMER","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Clearance; Law; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Position (finance); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.007710817025249586,"score_gpt":0.2358381702143783,"score_spread":0.22812735318912872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249935794","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040644254,0.011342061,0.00056386326,0.969125,0.0012319213,0.000003357128,0.000016124623,0.0000108302165,0.013642454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42244938,0.024925048,0.0014083162,0.5026075,0.010558224,0.00004435626,0.000023028166,0.000086404936,0.03789779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667215,0.0016335733,0.00013988612,0.0004250093,0.00075803173,0.0003713929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98919964,0.008768302,0.00058057613,0.00027982675,0.0007489323,0.0004227761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004383858,0.00034016772,0.00069477246,0.00095004216,0.007977105,0.006788996,0.002062191,0.01890221,0.0029044142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013621803,0.000517286,0.00032507893,0.0013358517,0.03363408,0.012088887,0.0043187565,0.01598548,0.00063263497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026205353,0.000016751605,0.00028245457,0.00007494672,0.0000055936725,0.00020326229,0.01266896,0.00016567255,0.000056714875,0.723349,0.25567657,0.0074739195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027541439,0.000024656974,0.0011230998,0.00047251538,0.000014132206,0.00033885837,0.020373128,0.0004968134,0.00032362196,0.5016509,0.47508445,0.00007023522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0256176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035835665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0256176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008056628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060902378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05845517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249976768","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0037","title":"The role of the courts in the political constitution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Principal (computer security); Constitutional law; Enforcement; Judicial independence; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.0070442479614752545,"score_gpt":0.22683069639267164,"score_spread":0.21978644843119638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249976768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03378326,0.010863583,0.03274487,0.10948561,0.00077844074,0.00010877619,0.000081440856,0.00008818698,0.8120658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499753,0.0027613286,0.0058744187,0.0075454456,0.0007646725,0.00017904479,0.000031441305,0.000052985433,0.03281535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97940546,0.012078814,0.00061471574,0.0015526761,0.003198764,0.0031495863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984567,0.011160776,0.0010056343,0.0009824471,0.0013777085,0.000906507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01504638,0.00037286564,0.0006369007,0.0023656355,0.011330963,0.016513526,0.0015088624,0.00847016,0.004582513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022554338,0.0008579268,0.000541829,0.0018860518,0.059473183,0.00941745,0.004748865,0.009235865,0.0007468606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010270933,0.0000011566061,0.000042854957,0.0000032791843,6.212709e-7,0.000011538535,0.00032891068,0.000051469717,0.000013790709,0.99883395,0.00025261202,0.0004588205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002338757,0.000016283522,0.0005082597,0.00009830781,0.000009728195,0.000042598207,0.0007423947,0.00047990034,0.00012055153,0.93297535,0.06496623,0.000017029966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023181744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024170304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97681826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014045846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016876586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10191023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250144784","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1011","title":"METHODOLOGY AND PERSPECTIVE IN THE THEORY OF LAWYERS’ ETHICS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS WOOLLEY AND MARKOVITS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Adjudication; Identity (music); Sociology; Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.10050969560981,"score_gpt":0.41219862166908017,"score_spread":0.3116889260592702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250144784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072991755,0.007103871,0.0014620615,0.9872033,0.0018950521,0.000007413745,0.0000067493133,0.000006700508,0.0015849374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12358155,0.02158419,0.010148278,0.8069815,0.02607296,0.0004214347,0.000034174005,0.00013397208,0.011041978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8665458,0.110595316,0.0026730166,0.006065885,0.012022939,0.0020970365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71728545,0.25438732,0.0049091754,0.004070109,0.013048835,0.0062992033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0926168,0.0010541044,0.0024605982,0.0033337257,0.015169061,0.01972186,0.00666853,0.025270304,0.0029970394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102383286,0.0011849011,0.0015875319,0.0038521548,0.093620084,0.024677798,0.011578962,0.048429377,0.00067642116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030332447,0.000055786342,0.00027405945,0.00018829024,0.000012874642,0.00018358222,0.02589758,0.00034517722,0.00006958459,0.8399463,0.12641306,0.0065834327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058285455,0.00004340976,0.00038945838,0.00080946926,0.000008247021,0.0001661976,0.019973796,0.0010590707,0.00011931727,0.56250185,0.41480514,0.00006575207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021481806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022052353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0926168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03108628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01924008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4898103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250264301","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2136","title":"Strange bedfellows","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nothing; Framing (construction); Charter; Political science; Law; Legislation; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01679811731214948,"score_gpt":0.24698094369839,"score_spread":0.23018282638624052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250264301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006540532,0.0070163943,0.0023167452,0.740212,0.028375514,0.000032793305,0.00026014194,0.00023176988,0.21501409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14661132,0.00421956,0.0016434392,0.47164944,0.008164527,0.000055967455,0.00018880985,0.00045738745,0.36700964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572057,0.0014546812,0.00011671131,0.0006516861,0.0011794756,0.0008769458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470794,0.0012960036,0.0002759485,0.0006494046,0.0015798127,0.0014909045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044227056,0.00065231026,0.0006255443,0.00083540543,0.01750882,0.0066728275,0.0014706062,0.0065585026,0.042643324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018931512,0.00035327487,0.0005895672,0.00066625484,0.015724463,0.009318611,0.005366665,0.016258582,0.011149858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031629468,0.000017211361,0.0005299307,0.000033605076,0.0000076212486,0.0008029341,0.0064456654,0.00005341601,0.00018043676,0.21691218,0.7569795,0.018005721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004044298,0.00000802491,0.00015999314,0.000077773984,0.0000024355522,0.00043022927,0.006147643,0.000051184354,0.00008502432,0.02574409,0.96727455,0.000014953709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033617277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0580349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042643324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056272657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053091045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1426562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250408531","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0024","title":"The Teacher","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affection; Sociology; Law; Rigour; Humanity; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019947039724658742,"score_gpt":0.31696612613223707,"score_spread":0.29701908640757835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250408531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027640043,0.012733835,0.00384782,0.24239737,0.029594814,0.00013734127,0.00029882364,0.00060683396,0.70761925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019939557,0.0028311615,0.0012018736,0.039866697,0.0015786479,0.00006459586,0.00014532695,0.00028012,0.9340919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960485,0.0010494594,0.00016164083,0.0007859016,0.001194944,0.0007595399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99280316,0.000517754,0.00036737183,0.00063581666,0.003103603,0.0025722643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021147765,0.0004584807,0.0005012684,0.0009200594,0.008832156,0.008975562,0.0011000915,0.0036009261,0.13459657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011646087,0.00047982385,0.0003808545,0.0007849363,0.003641858,0.0067149666,0.0064132516,0.007941112,0.09276594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011198289,0.000031384043,0.00038855095,0.000058829486,0.0000023385412,0.0001606165,0.004782217,0.000017372971,0.00022892369,0.04065369,0.91084933,0.042815562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014401681,0.00000494565,0.000118015756,0.00005298836,6.028235e-7,0.00010795098,0.0016641255,0.000006063618,0.000025401238,0.0014422333,0.9965733,0.0000029504965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074516693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015449745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13459657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005555341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008591016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4502704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251224987","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0046","title":"'To heap distress upon distress?: 'Comparative reflections on interest-rate ceilings","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Financial literacy; Economics; Redistribution (election); Politics; House of Commons; Interest rate; Law and economics; Political economy; Public economics; Political science; Monetary economics; Law; Finance; Parliament","score_opus":0.047540486916349566,"score_gpt":0.26009263057957366,"score_spread":0.21255214366322409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251224987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0818406,0.03153766,0.0046935603,0.3466568,0.0017005078,0.000022989509,0.00024229173,0.00004826459,0.5332575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564825,0.007991297,0.00045974902,0.021502048,0.0016154377,0.000034876088,0.00005420937,0.00005110023,0.011808649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923983,0.00377276,0.00025082435,0.00073428714,0.0011126745,0.0017312411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99146324,0.005242149,0.00095104915,0.0008227984,0.0010650737,0.0004556832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012234595,0.00031934207,0.00056837813,0.0012563572,0.004685541,0.01027249,0.0019673635,0.006762938,0.00621676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022007445,0.00027814152,0.0005803519,0.0019585497,0.034170408,0.012748321,0.0056049554,0.008555709,0.00044854128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019934218,0.0000058962028,0.00034646425,0.000035972764,0.0000034091065,0.000059333954,0.008837569,0.00007694496,0.00003607717,0.9769279,0.007609344,0.006041185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006619632,0.00008515492,0.017038403,0.0011960291,0.00003566439,0.00039541765,0.039700203,0.00037026632,0.00062885863,0.37118143,0.5692191,0.00008328485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024214443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022648277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97578555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010064893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003920486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0730263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251434993","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0014","title":"Index to Volume 58","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02522958638035363,"score_gpt":0.16715563764747376,"score_spread":0.14192605126712013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251434993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032348145,0.0022853562,0.00025286683,0.0025733316,0.008089046,0.00028392405,0.0053326744,0.0008715819,0.9799876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00065130513,0.00077097875,0.00005717534,0.00065767195,0.0013822262,0.00006923972,0.0009153024,0.00017777373,0.99531835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989512,0.00008341996,0.00005431347,0.00015353935,0.0006085156,0.0001489813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735886,0.0004558337,0.00014730534,0.0003278879,0.0009849437,0.0007252131],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006369723,0.0023756044,0.0024602332,0.013088648,0.004135111,0.0079204505,0.002406129,0.0033818847,0.81398064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053590294,0.0009584913,0.00096112816,0.009444021,0.0014870096,0.0032947375,0.0038755361,0.0025636565,0.7708784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009423738,0.000020005762,0.000073893774,0.000079981925,0.0000021167114,0.000011339523,0.000016095453,0.00002942755,0.000049284223,0.0013713492,0.98273695,0.015600153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011003102,0.000010299332,0.0007374017,0.00019151405,0.0000040547575,0.0000143257275,0.00003710418,0.00007268422,0.000050382816,0.0011563479,0.99770564,0.000009261318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028793344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05762072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18601936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004504029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034051747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26533407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251762122","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.001","title":"EMPIRE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE REAL SPANISH CONTRIBUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; International law; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Law; Humanism; Natural law; Politics; Vocabulary; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04463799458015297,"score_gpt":0.21915463777847477,"score_spread":0.1745166431983218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251762122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033040233,0.042401403,0.0010094353,0.0775983,0.001159336,0.000010500906,0.000064330205,0.0000329197,0.8446835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86018854,0.023048798,0.0007225798,0.011030022,0.0020892257,0.000029158507,0.00008426881,0.00009990157,0.10270758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981729,0.00063075894,0.000045822482,0.00017462597,0.00046899717,0.00050694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825007,0.00074193644,0.0001361577,0.00018479727,0.0004547385,0.00023229845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032251643,0.0003675279,0.0004808295,0.0014260882,0.0041487566,0.012451571,0.00062654965,0.0023991389,0.0059850146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005021321,0.00025907427,0.00029074957,0.0017817833,0.014545739,0.004639359,0.0038415673,0.00487049,0.0004935288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014272243,0.000023614262,0.00064830325,0.000041616095,0.000006572401,0.00008385447,0.004409681,0.00015104117,0.00004287698,0.9714137,0.011359303,0.011805236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003363539,0.0000142256,0.004065125,0.00036856777,0.00001216715,0.000089818066,0.0056024864,0.00027801725,0.0000810301,0.17113791,0.81830066,0.000016229513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053302027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040788963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053302027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017278392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00885378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12536407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251764200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.93","title":"Redressing the Right Wrong: The Argument from Corrective Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Indigenous; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022258492148469238,"score_gpt":0.2682911348908973,"score_spread":0.24603264274242806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251764200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04965701,0.006332709,0.042148504,0.3856353,0.002356065,0.00015550258,0.000042488577,0.000112361115,0.5135601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340788,0.0008772317,0.0032604537,0.041609358,0.0006439834,0.00009739874,0.00000978827,0.00007182622,0.019351117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797283,0.010618274,0.0005531873,0.001895778,0.004145116,0.0030594058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820123,0.010767946,0.0016329809,0.0018721173,0.0023791634,0.0013355854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015284348,0.0005554831,0.0007419095,0.0012842665,0.018603876,0.009540365,0.0023089664,0.014253263,0.0027311407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031156674,0.00044588392,0.0007729966,0.000718387,0.08260097,0.012010015,0.010114469,0.016676107,0.0003592469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009367867,0.000013318692,0.00020723761,0.000034324425,0.0000052969103,0.0001884796,0.008533329,0.00015204615,0.00007733705,0.9850798,0.0038413422,0.0018580565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045110064,0.00003814287,0.00051554444,0.00035980917,0.000022813843,0.00033315553,0.013131867,0.0007871826,0.0006319294,0.8670402,0.11704532,0.00004893215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024774611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020664658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024774611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01171022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012066768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08496404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251865052","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0031","title":"Index to Volume 59","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Computer science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.016139228396103083,"score_gpt":0.17292880075427064,"score_spread":0.15678957235816757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251865052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000292498,0.0021139178,0.00024842436,0.0023911807,0.007577118,0.0002827309,0.005142183,0.0008043002,0.98114747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00063380325,0.0007608483,0.00005594054,0.00064563274,0.0012203812,0.00006583203,0.00090201315,0.00017010902,0.9955454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891746,0.00008331132,0.000057477002,0.0001614504,0.00062707654,0.00015323312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973924,0.00043572593,0.00014090538,0.00032411804,0.00097095076,0.0007358887],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006342497,0.0022709754,0.002399682,0.01283929,0.0043241954,0.008132986,0.002378015,0.003392652,0.81770325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005372673,0.00092038244,0.0009999146,0.009306178,0.0015313275,0.0032382156,0.004062591,0.0025353995,0.7799267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000986084,0.000021274545,0.00007646105,0.0000846291,0.0000022379688,0.00001268895,0.000017346598,0.000030486328,0.00005434247,0.0015180118,0.98175806,0.0164147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102338545,0.000009469346,0.00068947684,0.0001871009,0.0000038102974,0.000013971023,0.0000356913,0.00006832288,0.000051751467,0.0010980627,0.9978231,0.000009084513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030646825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059267044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18229675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046305223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035226382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26002413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252389196","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.623","title":"TREBILCOCK ON TAX AVOIDANCE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Tax law; Tax avoidance; Income tax; Law; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Tax reform; Engineering","score_opus":0.007172937373887382,"score_gpt":0.18780731705785964,"score_spread":0.18063437968397225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252389196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072348462,0.043589797,0.0016467299,0.19541126,0.0053883647,0.000024771552,0.00006893696,0.000055829994,0.7465795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2506064,0.031621013,0.00091006455,0.110577814,0.0044100652,0.00005906803,0.00004888965,0.00011307415,0.6016537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886847,0.000269987,0.00002301456,0.00021080601,0.00043830284,0.00018943948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937695,0.00019784302,0.000042290536,0.000049620634,0.00022849863,0.000104873114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009680414,0.00030471932,0.00026364974,0.00066199864,0.0048744,0.0033424827,0.0006206905,0.002625455,0.0072545926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032741462,0.0001880092,0.00019130083,0.00072194246,0.004327648,0.0028280509,0.0018037913,0.005305983,0.0017168206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007420081,0.0000114548275,0.00020331722,0.000028598928,0.0000018521531,0.00007738474,0.0016604732,0.000088264635,0.000055978926,0.6553345,0.3241087,0.018422093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018233743,0.000008365889,0.00036991655,0.00014607624,0.0000021063606,0.000076571305,0.00065835705,0.00009331894,0.00009852402,0.050930373,0.94760585,0.00000861658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040642984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04018817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040642984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046918364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045443727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08081281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252601561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.663","title":"WHY IS THIS TAKING SO LONG? THE MOVE TOWARD A NATIONAL SECURITIES REGULATOR","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regulator; Business; Law and economics; Regulatory authority; Accounting; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.025818973041209305,"score_gpt":0.28586492119223617,"score_spread":0.2600459481510269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252601561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036359068,0.003949328,0.014283017,0.8637626,0.0016571361,0.00003918328,0.000114591116,0.00012334842,0.07971173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497395,0.002982917,0.007527505,0.10754844,0.00071508053,0.00006697713,0.0000650739,0.0000745982,0.031279847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99269307,0.001813478,0.00013790274,0.0012055717,0.0019601241,0.0021898714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862688,0.0029439756,0.0010687925,0.0009298876,0.0055287182,0.0032596723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010080856,0.00027011064,0.0006576521,0.000572255,0.010749519,0.0083100395,0.0019559183,0.011946663,0.006062373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015410569,0.00034588197,0.0007743583,0.00087145745,0.012096686,0.010027065,0.0030160835,0.01065053,0.0012696867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051458555,0.000040302093,0.0041670245,0.000079064645,0.000025167881,0.00032328087,0.003807309,0.000681513,0.0006929021,0.9181078,0.052968834,0.019055324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007007786,0.00012191831,0.0077652833,0.0003713424,0.000074111194,0.0005630616,0.01842352,0.0033576672,0.0014995085,0.59789604,0.3696493,0.0002080731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23968624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30163428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23968624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017443907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030031879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47658223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252619127","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.265","title":"LORD WRIGHT AND INNOVATIVE TRADITIONALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Law; Restitution; Tort; Duty; Law and economics; Statutory law; Sociology; Appeal; Political science; Liability; Economics; History","score_opus":0.014778380003170836,"score_gpt":0.25242463714073543,"score_spread":0.2376462571375646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252619127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04310837,0.022266626,0.013203655,0.18327112,0.00398065,0.000058931404,0.000068843605,0.00009258311,0.7339493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7008779,0.00550562,0.0058360966,0.05056181,0.0031459143,0.00010301392,0.000044005697,0.00011521452,0.23381044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426407,0.00232599,0.0001780657,0.0007036479,0.0019216319,0.00060660555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974063,0.0012892251,0.00016645652,0.00023108613,0.0007182136,0.00018874646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039526615,0.00028841718,0.00030179834,0.0010866036,0.0051511885,0.004937086,0.00084242877,0.0035546958,0.004198568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059906594,0.00027024074,0.0003035829,0.00058388786,0.02298724,0.005015676,0.0033757268,0.0058302376,0.00087812403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005959204,0.000008250881,0.00010068488,0.000015828185,0.0000016697459,0.000062892985,0.0025085967,0.0000537197,0.00006236857,0.9784604,0.01415531,0.004564318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015873196,0.000030825977,0.00036993696,0.00013219561,0.000004435904,0.00015276558,0.0014188729,0.0002810049,0.00021959677,0.36377195,0.63358337,0.000019220312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067074364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00787335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006876274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006876274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002925683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049891114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252727894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1003","title":"THREE ISSUES IN LEGAL ETHICS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Law; Adjudication; Jury; Political science; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03897483545341218,"score_gpt":0.3586189794483755,"score_spread":0.3196441439949633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252727894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031159217,0.014258816,0.013021223,0.64586097,0.004463507,0.000050603874,0.00007426486,0.000064067215,0.31909066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48030865,0.016223824,0.027493162,0.29242682,0.022233747,0.0007430822,0.00018757053,0.00033105563,0.16005215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836586,0.008663008,0.00058334746,0.0011302567,0.004192978,0.0017716873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836377,0.010093136,0.0007765679,0.0013424264,0.0026302969,0.0015197386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015603425,0.00074503967,0.0008716713,0.0028311508,0.013171163,0.01659194,0.002588852,0.020669421,0.01138082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027098687,0.00048039202,0.0014717935,0.0019783361,0.049181778,0.016292065,0.0074620876,0.020631608,0.0033856765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025369684,0.000007098688,0.000028172546,0.000011676122,8.7747964e-7,0.000022129594,0.00048376241,0.00002471531,0.000010084249,0.98951334,0.008420236,0.0014754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105772515,0.0000058428,0.000059536913,0.000115310126,0.0000019029403,0.0000589784,0.00083497696,0.00015759164,0.000028841092,0.8874809,0.1112382,0.000007375025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074735917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054441704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020669421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014858461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012261684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107806206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253009809","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.147","title":"A HEGELIAN CRIMINAL LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Scholarship; Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Law; Rendering (computer graphics); Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04431641068584398,"score_gpt":0.20805710705676297,"score_spread":0.16374069637091898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253009809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013446681,0.06306576,0.018259348,0.15809026,0.0023391377,0.000027138103,0.00008643484,0.000083805644,0.7446015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64931893,0.038718954,0.010675458,0.03905916,0.002757119,0.00011924863,0.00008989495,0.00013856798,0.2591226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788874,0.0007284153,0.00005317303,0.0003420969,0.000699056,0.00028851355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998895,0.000543193,0.00008541247,0.00011413341,0.0002230976,0.00013912619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019207651,0.0004258519,0.00047288573,0.0019045296,0.0047260337,0.005060968,0.0007206649,0.003299716,0.00317168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004299437,0.00028401683,0.00028273757,0.0009718664,0.034602005,0.00546678,0.0029155738,0.0048373756,0.0010604732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020426323,0.0000021518135,0.000027700871,0.000007791252,8.138556e-7,0.000011330726,0.0003564513,0.000055070217,0.000009792787,0.9901153,0.007012051,0.0023995752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055347728,0.000006441184,0.00011662661,0.00012909512,0.0000019651904,0.00005809037,0.00041206914,0.00017394623,0.000070930815,0.7963476,0.2026695,0.000008151199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016489381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021625789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016489381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008870613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006867328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064361155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253206351","doi":"10.3138/temp-utlj-barkow","title":"LAW VERSUS POLITICS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Discretion; Law; Politics; Criminal justice; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Legal doctrine; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.04343393329329004,"score_gpt":0.2977326394517626,"score_spread":0.25429870615847255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253206351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068278676,0.05052757,0.0064721745,0.26433128,0.0035148489,0.000027014898,0.00012184033,0.000044222812,0.6681332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7555348,0.029285604,0.0024896269,0.11959103,0.009351981,0.00018060699,0.00014260237,0.0001745314,0.08324927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463886,0.0026441312,0.00012612369,0.00071928214,0.0010528356,0.0008187482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951807,0.0030126069,0.0003050589,0.00044642895,0.00064295024,0.0004123064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005345895,0.00045226456,0.00064610934,0.0015967885,0.007056515,0.010196789,0.000966664,0.00520753,0.009180255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011771047,0.00028818412,0.00032305435,0.0019895714,0.044613928,0.012325055,0.003925953,0.0070601306,0.0016577006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040337222,0.0000032548594,0.00008259065,0.00001997103,0.0000013044586,0.0000129827495,0.00074464554,0.000012133714,0.000017992064,0.9905608,0.00617219,0.002367963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011448371,0.000019776164,0.0005400126,0.00029463603,0.000006543459,0.0000667762,0.003076616,0.00006290651,0.000089498164,0.66693413,0.32888874,0.000008827148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009822934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007889342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010196789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005987659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007129522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04344374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253339146","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.179","title":"ERNIE'S THREE WORLDS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035658198521737815,"score_gpt":0.24481946985963499,"score_spread":0.20916127133789716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253339146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0086573865,0.0051376494,0.004638347,0.09017996,0.0015282353,0.00002397959,0.00007779924,0.00006577075,0.8896909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51395327,0.004914103,0.005577244,0.035937224,0.0006341541,0.00012692541,0.00009774272,0.00017064088,0.43858868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964169,0.0011334623,0.000076979566,0.0006491368,0.0008739794,0.0008495363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815494,0.0005603227,0.00009354305,0.00030649017,0.00026548555,0.00061924465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034292762,0.00055074156,0.00049263856,0.0013404046,0.014381106,0.013548779,0.0009493058,0.003933591,0.015661906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053438237,0.00042080562,0.00045217574,0.0007825046,0.023348046,0.011381051,0.011665005,0.007342524,0.002203001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006060949,0.000006894132,0.00014360504,0.0000070134993,0.0000012996071,0.000055768363,0.0053024124,0.000025611242,0.000021563683,0.9595169,0.02993667,0.0049762577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048868687,0.0000083435325,0.00032505064,0.00012552181,0.0000029499017,0.00016117936,0.008787192,0.00012324365,0.00009827884,0.28319237,0.7071568,0.000014073974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03192009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059030607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03192009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009790192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071105273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07103318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253351290","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0000","title":"The judicial invention of property norms: Ellickson’s whalemen revisited","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014654528245273529,"score_gpt":0.24124766129125105,"score_spread":0.22659313304597753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253351290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060765926,0.006928732,0.01866089,0.17712696,0.0010371152,0.000072217255,0.000114650764,0.000052642437,0.7352409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107154,0.0013069994,0.0024236306,0.014317474,0.00068829115,0.00005407874,0.000021905911,0.00005421424,0.07041794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558073,0.0016359456,0.00013425996,0.001054282,0.0007066449,0.00088821905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99244237,0.0049036094,0.00039259277,0.0010454799,0.0008816267,0.0003343829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009386571,0.00038161883,0.00081697357,0.0014279201,0.009190966,0.008576986,0.0021241847,0.013812951,0.0094379345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021443645,0.00054608623,0.0005608086,0.0014356299,0.038004886,0.011287553,0.0034943013,0.0095482,0.00080436416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039524293,0.0000029979592,0.0000656095,0.0000050735484,0.0000017586802,0.000036324138,0.0013429734,0.000040037994,0.000014936682,0.9949025,0.0023800903,0.001203724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023918252,0.00000609989,0.0003342528,0.00006196721,0.00001133746,0.00004570369,0.0012912488,0.00034328853,0.00017674714,0.93067116,0.06701771,0.000016578166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08349325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114892684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08349325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009816944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008031672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16601449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253863679","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016.0001","title":"Decomposing <i>Bhasin v Hrynew</i>  : Towards an institutional understanding of the general organizing principle of good faith in contractual performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Faith; Political science; Common law; Fair dealing; Subject (documents); Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Good faith; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04354523155426537,"score_gpt":0.2984003652038038,"score_spread":0.25485513364953843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253863679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042134907,0.0074389447,0.041920055,0.12992473,0.0008109022,0.00025215966,0.00029752046,0.00010779989,0.77711296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90196615,0.004889941,0.01483139,0.029732622,0.0003714907,0.00024129737,0.00025414093,0.00009767396,0.047615245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385965,0.0011134621,0.00018028765,0.0008322182,0.002501959,0.0015122864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646974,0.0011393793,0.00040585586,0.0003714907,0.0010778295,0.0005356122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046858108,0.00053020875,0.00047747185,0.0026618582,0.008652861,0.013929297,0.003118075,0.0054089082,0.0036262446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072246334,0.0006198336,0.00059161364,0.0026170623,0.044904537,0.009667399,0.006156127,0.010470212,0.0006186577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025298293,0.0000023851876,0.000142875,0.000008996711,0.0000012611823,0.000031899304,0.0025180578,0.00006167681,0.0000585169,0.9930254,0.0022571057,0.0018893568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020173115,0.000021580783,0.0026681605,0.00029403344,0.00001510571,0.0001365155,0.007292526,0.0014982269,0.0005926967,0.81766695,0.16969064,0.000103442246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6113985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6686746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6113985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04208647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052402332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78178006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254039495","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.81","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW AT THE MARGINS: LAW, POWER, AND PREROGATIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.011029377175947543,"score_gpt":0.2473415289119836,"score_spread":0.23631215173603606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254039495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07170479,0.05642524,0.042934716,0.21586964,0.0017078338,0.00011536606,0.000059029237,0.00015233085,0.6110311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644056,0.007089878,0.0018487329,0.0068429415,0.002046591,0.000080150356,0.000011043383,0.000059778875,0.017615195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.972569,0.014036722,0.00094940205,0.0019545516,0.007867634,0.0026226335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94471085,0.04185878,0.0036092612,0.00213198,0.00605794,0.0016310852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020180462,0.00031803563,0.0007075439,0.0020487674,0.008558658,0.022476662,0.0019162958,0.005788833,0.003996089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07963507,0.00046223906,0.0003328536,0.0018982693,0.042116497,0.012404504,0.004978699,0.0074767014,0.00087810186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101102205,0.000009056436,0.00025559205,0.000031673622,0.0000034759057,0.000052539875,0.003354161,0.0001395842,0.00014551454,0.9803469,0.003058869,0.012592523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002818092,0.000051545263,0.001180959,0.0003736609,0.000011772847,0.00012214856,0.0035439467,0.0004334751,0.00057573384,0.9041475,0.089489914,0.000041240968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063251024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064020525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022476662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008666755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01781994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10672575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254078437","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.337","title":"Response to Ian Shapiro, ‘On Non-domination’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03401959761954053,"score_gpt":0.29999730937931274,"score_spread":0.2659777117597722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254078437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014392841,0.00096444803,0.00006544263,0.98892564,0.00920507,0.000003913231,0.000029231966,0.000015876722,0.0006464767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012035405,0.00023863044,0.000042323838,0.9895907,0.0061039883,0.000012273554,0.000008962771,0.000021932872,0.002777654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222285,0.0019010765,0.00083765347,0.0016526197,0.0019235353,0.0014622498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97123104,0.017593237,0.0022087179,0.00097589777,0.0048681013,0.0031230068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069087404,0.0015043649,0.0024024714,0.0015828921,0.011806004,0.011426868,0.00526644,0.10871945,0.009459665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052354332,0.0016745548,0.0018453819,0.0020409196,0.016373409,0.01087811,0.009627972,0.104274996,0.0069044563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001556407,0.0000053552335,0.00009902682,0.000045881352,0.000007701123,0.00012857626,0.00073238736,0.000027795002,0.00006912264,0.0044927537,0.9934202,0.00095569255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035279256,0.00001703366,0.001280134,0.0004341933,0.000026874694,0.00027920768,0.0052507217,0.0001338547,0.00026828103,0.010887667,0.98128784,0.000098940654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024636526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04399235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10871945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008069392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009333078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058547854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254144971","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0003","title":"Pandectism and the Gaian classification of things","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Slavic languages; Media studies; Sociology; History; Classics; Social science; Library science; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.0107399347739563,"score_gpt":0.1724584517980768,"score_spread":0.16171851702412052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254144971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027618611,0.002674748,0.00900296,0.007670118,0.00039079596,0.00006159448,0.0003549563,0.00007251633,0.9521537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9310969,0.0014437711,0.009310221,0.0013769021,0.0001821532,0.00013643842,0.00048492514,0.00006465777,0.05590405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985593,0.00056528003,0.000062530555,0.00030651726,0.000208969,0.000297531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931455,0.00015605876,0.00007974724,0.00014020203,0.00018919758,0.000120373516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009029842,0.00035083806,0.00027409615,0.0026367153,0.0056832605,0.0066222996,0.0006932816,0.0011275101,0.007863593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016676068,0.00018218672,0.0003992114,0.0033391742,0.021086264,0.0050841914,0.0029010714,0.0022788143,0.0012163757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035140442,0.0000010100101,0.00017855909,0.000005761149,0.0000012541426,0.000010924694,0.0011547502,0.000018351304,0.000014219303,0.994863,0.0015232494,0.0022253967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007367573,0.000011495926,0.0021743332,0.000045088836,0.0000071919153,0.00012814699,0.0027907954,0.00022675822,0.00004416945,0.78809994,0.20645371,0.000011172388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030873654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036091447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030873654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061738323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024819802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061387897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254361771","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.761","title":"BASIC RIGHTS AND SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW: THE INCEST CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Public law; Political science; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Comparative law; Legislator; Criminalization; Constitutional law; Common law; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal justice; Legislation","score_opus":0.04254894311437708,"score_gpt":0.26682160793049053,"score_spread":0.22427266481611347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254361771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4424492,0.0041946275,0.01391118,0.06536755,0.00020910426,0.000083185754,0.00012032424,0.000051102015,0.47361365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983093,0.00062822277,0.0011108866,0.0048306785,0.00014556242,0.00005988312,0.000021460344,0.000010550653,0.010099816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349445,0.0020306392,0.00020015618,0.00064595643,0.0015006776,0.0021281799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919984,0.004571073,0.0008182839,0.0010346622,0.000795384,0.00078214594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056439233,0.00029435987,0.0006364814,0.0011646848,0.005540044,0.004619457,0.0015337887,0.006828691,0.00314458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010864189,0.00046302026,0.00072720484,0.0010190182,0.03297931,0.007365282,0.008116639,0.011000402,0.00033966248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010552648,0.000022088512,0.00055746234,0.000011033312,0.00000290552,0.00030575733,0.0015278882,0.00013644628,0.00009585922,0.99487805,0.0006682792,0.0017837025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056177316,0.000071410584,0.0024415539,0.00010964905,0.000022561897,0.00076835504,0.0023249404,0.00083873846,0.00064259535,0.9626499,0.03004804,0.000026120668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014773618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017505974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014773618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043827984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039401916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031799614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254376792","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.037","title":"DISTINCTIONS OF POWER AND THE POWER OF DISTINCTIONS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR KOSKENNIEMI","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Rationalization (economics); Power (physics); Epistemology; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Pretext; Law; Empire; Sociology; Political science; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029781548179835825,"score_gpt":0.22118174203996982,"score_spread":0.191400193860134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254376792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010285749,0.0088134445,0.00017413274,0.9846565,0.0025025257,0.0000025329207,0.000011019106,0.0000070404544,0.002804248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13851967,0.019795395,0.0012095685,0.78848207,0.029160602,0.000069955095,0.000038366936,0.0001210192,0.022603327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98616403,0.008345521,0.00042022808,0.0014094702,0.0021297645,0.0015309931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98125976,0.013833941,0.0007587625,0.000419068,0.0022134904,0.0015148536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016074674,0.00094647263,0.00165398,0.0015163039,0.010949265,0.011793765,0.004473187,0.020668108,0.003177515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024642296,0.0006900688,0.0008532778,0.0024617678,0.039208442,0.018018134,0.0076577645,0.03882712,0.00068775576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053033764,0.00002461726,0.00023318351,0.00009466479,0.000012610085,0.0004169287,0.032716867,0.00014737024,0.0001359425,0.5096231,0.45140007,0.00514166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052896197,0.000029061783,0.0006376692,0.00036238634,0.000011369585,0.00028546792,0.030591065,0.00033263987,0.00017734552,0.12346504,0.843979,0.00007598631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035561413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046195336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035561413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018257149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009574521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13246548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254409687","doi":"10.3138/utlj.022814ra","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012708497647286716,"score_gpt":0.1926830216063101,"score_spread":0.17997452395902339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254409687","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025597957,0.5956295,0.00057151663,0.07884453,0.07131416,0.00006292702,0.00087666773,0.00019323807,0.25225157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030334147,0.35742667,0.00048144392,0.040016927,0.028683975,0.00006593326,0.00089256925,0.0001736691,0.5692255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991124,0.000101631034,0.000038402824,0.00009065254,0.00058481505,0.00007210033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649376,0.00073200243,0.00016116699,0.00015219365,0.002079391,0.0003813831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097583194,0.0004063108,0.0008117147,0.0027109447,0.0013093543,0.003961305,0.0014406753,0.0025558711,0.1325053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060660634,0.0003322886,0.000323071,0.0041176085,0.0011062883,0.0025283415,0.0014248908,0.0030477666,0.080995515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002264379,0.00000275742,0.000009579662,0.00011822972,0.0000011762264,0.000010039965,0.000015995694,0.000009649026,0.000011416463,0.0013164515,0.97747713,0.021025343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015382509,0.0000013602646,0.000049122948,0.00022286361,0.0000013499093,0.000028394576,0.00001912119,0.000002487625,0.0000055595865,0.00030885564,0.99935776,0.0000015925126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011061097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027197175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1325053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002815862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005493561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44327438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254710195","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.119","title":"CHOICES AND APPROACHES: ANTI-TERRORISM LAW AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM AFTER SEPTEMBER 11","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Civil liberties; Law; Political science; Kingdom; Civil society; Commission; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Counter terrorism; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.06355987544218396,"score_gpt":0.2555994116095605,"score_spread":0.19203953616737657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254710195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15160084,0.05727357,0.0015247634,0.41058597,0.0016692515,0.00013214497,0.00028168323,0.000024155197,0.37690765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355072,0.010849122,0.0010273794,0.03092697,0.00012591384,0.000081905266,0.00006022837,0.00002075223,0.021400537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96812826,0.01638629,0.0015020818,0.0016333251,0.0054947273,0.006855243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97636956,0.011578381,0.0017454595,0.0008066487,0.0052291946,0.00427088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013396108,0.00044838828,0.0006418882,0.0035063382,0.040986035,0.03194589,0.0025576986,0.015443586,0.005305306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024544472,0.00075148494,0.0006985222,0.0055271387,0.06415565,0.009198551,0.010675411,0.009693734,0.00048652638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004584845,0.000029277206,0.004161348,0.000114158844,0.000019195224,0.00074557477,0.091262355,0.000255119,0.00007449834,0.87581,0.016457962,0.011024736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054424654,0.000051604253,0.02960543,0.0021239135,0.000036708487,0.00033749573,0.3915025,0.00039775835,0.0002586468,0.09389383,0.48144245,0.0002952783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9416293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9687909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14457503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104755215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254802156","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.059","title":"COMBATING TERRORIST FINANCING: IS CANADA'S LEGAL REGIME EFFECTIVE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Commission; Money laundering; Convention; Political science; Finance; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Business; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.011249892374082306,"score_gpt":0.20787374230447425,"score_spread":0.19662384993039195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254802156","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04687436,0.018049171,0.0011936412,0.6064621,0.0024485716,0.0002650154,0.001026559,0.00008211301,0.32359844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6692864,0.026787361,0.0037062804,0.22628212,0.0012304119,0.00015516691,0.0007432065,0.000095777614,0.07171326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.972705,0.0020002748,0.0006229504,0.0012312412,0.0148981465,0.008542319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95679003,0.010191928,0.002685361,0.0009148862,0.022779576,0.00663818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013055921,0.0005236736,0.00076846173,0.004005375,0.01940568,0.023816207,0.004361572,0.01036508,0.009799845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049466822,0.000599142,0.00077547226,0.0046015102,0.01489734,0.0068622474,0.0028795158,0.008348472,0.00067945267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001341339,0.00019631916,0.025413712,0.00071676326,0.00011316231,0.00076371635,0.0070611336,0.0008934536,0.0006569756,0.6174454,0.24656047,0.10004477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021780819,0.00013710004,0.081882715,0.002984711,0.00034246288,0.00024818932,0.017920788,0.0014531622,0.0019936443,0.03478818,0.85760015,0.0004311315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99236476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15372922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15372922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40737504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98155415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255801062","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.65","title":"THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF AN EXTERMINATORY LEGALITY: LAW AND THE HOLOCAUST","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nazism; The Holocaust; Political science; Judaism; Impossibility; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.011502320031210907,"score_gpt":0.2558543895657031,"score_spread":0.2443520695344922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255801062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5790433,0.016262297,0.0033251368,0.09101899,0.00020283544,0.000018413146,0.00003256385,0.00004635258,0.31005013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994949,0.0011010375,0.00014365722,0.00055350055,0.000025668092,0.0000025890204,0.0000025534382,0.0000040847744,0.003217964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985514,0.0007023994,0.00003743346,0.000104868355,0.00025759544,0.0003462645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978928,0.001107513,0.0002882482,0.0001598047,0.0002482484,0.00030345912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002411863,0.00015209305,0.00023899703,0.00097263145,0.010305055,0.0091184955,0.0007799025,0.002360551,0.0011332408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037016037,0.0002573026,0.00013753261,0.000751836,0.09362506,0.004334925,0.0028543333,0.0031328888,0.000116281146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010264005,0.0000075880785,0.00091593,0.000014611374,0.0000019841311,0.00025150224,0.070951976,0.000068065594,0.00015570848,0.9230484,0.001279083,0.0032948602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004844166,0.00005910653,0.014662497,0.0003608177,0.000025340654,0.0007067763,0.19195443,0.0006849312,0.0008458807,0.61100495,0.17959452,0.0000524425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20604461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27772504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20604461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023218155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138381375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40969062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255813588","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0014","title":"Contents: volume LIV, 2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.025887185600513837,"score_gpt":0.18449456161820066,"score_spread":0.15860737601768682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255813588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010559683,0.009501776,0.00053671777,0.010554372,0.014967606,0.0001611588,0.009200412,0.00081787637,0.9532041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024812939,0.0020098048,0.00007999157,0.00046670885,0.0016611565,0.000029113362,0.0010675084,0.00012958825,0.99207485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923134,0.00006296972,0.000035285808,0.0000931998,0.00046884594,0.00010841887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998131,0.00036735798,0.00009851878,0.00018062131,0.00087071426,0.00035178542],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056770135,0.00096486794,0.0009938338,0.006245561,0.0032949003,0.008524725,0.0014189867,0.002186264,0.4972679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032717772,0.0005026646,0.000369581,0.0066313776,0.0014308931,0.002299793,0.0013897476,0.0021329233,0.2231033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008642548,0.0000112739,0.000067050394,0.00006495092,0.0000011317446,0.000008536264,0.00003107289,0.000042433712,0.00003824441,0.002627217,0.9873016,0.009797826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007166103,0.000009284635,0.0011980147,0.0002026577,0.0000048568895,0.000014567467,0.00006887083,0.00009211244,0.00009755938,0.0015566731,0.9967428,0.000005389413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07456339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16667603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4972679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01304441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056481613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7170863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255829909","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.845","title":"‘NECESSITY KNOWS NO LAW’: ON EXTREME CASES AND UNCODIFIABLE NECESSITIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontological ethics; Dignity; Normative; Context (archaeology); Torture; Consequentialism; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Human rights; History","score_opus":0.06945261550055411,"score_gpt":0.20941931047490123,"score_spread":0.1399666949743471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255829909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13804695,0.007826731,0.16668673,0.05817054,0.00053723383,0.00008024812,0.000119498676,0.00011333314,0.6284187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98043424,0.0015367689,0.009093704,0.0023945617,0.0003495707,0.0000715764,0.000046952096,0.00004486075,0.0060277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946321,0.0025561198,0.00025537112,0.00074331235,0.0011216886,0.0006913806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98967326,0.0073514353,0.00055596186,0.0013461331,0.0007025966,0.0003707625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006390291,0.00041115182,0.0007799921,0.0019397654,0.0050750915,0.006201174,0.0016307887,0.004607811,0.0033895613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014265121,0.0005106625,0.00085040403,0.0012782746,0.048944857,0.01779847,0.0064931894,0.006085881,0.00040671186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022603103,0.0000017815794,0.00006709868,0.0000045022166,9.4334973e-7,0.000058130565,0.00051983865,0.000088565444,0.000015149809,0.9981337,0.00023236976,0.0008755913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018472693,0.000001766079,0.000074429656,0.000016056081,0.0000012509457,0.000050925348,0.0002186064,0.00024919084,0.000025397012,0.9960608,0.0032959997,0.0000036776387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038320266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038996283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006390291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046951156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001923258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034065604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255938873","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1021","title":"PHILOSOPHICAL LEGAL ETHICS AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Democracy; Political science; Legal process; Sociology; Compromise; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.051558578290668754,"score_gpt":0.35012770066188137,"score_spread":0.29856912237121264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255938873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014481927,0.038261723,0.01640026,0.21868223,0.0010493941,0.000043875654,0.000052286265,0.000054266853,0.7109739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86060464,0.016533844,0.0071044206,0.03655156,0.0023000361,0.00017766921,0.00006354129,0.0001100858,0.076554194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892384,0.006959321,0.0002794246,0.0007513189,0.0017767451,0.0009948271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485993,0.0028849565,0.00043361145,0.00064646587,0.0006579514,0.00051711453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073846485,0.00055269094,0.00050729024,0.0019079535,0.0100368075,0.009668367,0.0013197818,0.00916062,0.007760305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009879184,0.00038679613,0.0005786717,0.0015988293,0.08007752,0.012549552,0.0070439703,0.008406655,0.0014855363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001277464,0.000003750159,0.000033096887,0.000010998453,8.7783906e-7,0.00001562258,0.002455516,0.0000342372,0.00001283469,0.9936651,0.002365134,0.0014015354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044790536,0.000005832352,0.00008883522,0.0001337305,0.0000013170893,0.00007056914,0.0018256449,0.00010318136,0.000043826236,0.89655024,0.10116703,0.0000052731775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003782567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002564459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100368075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009032031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046928725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06553227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256174237","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.643","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF CONTRACT REMEDIES (AND WHY DO CONTRACTS PROFESSORS TEACH REMEDIES FIRST?)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Compensation (psychology); Incentive; Normative; Breach of contract; Contract theory; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01139003454695533,"score_gpt":0.2541324606851664,"score_spread":0.24274242613821104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256174237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053791676,0.03563513,0.014218161,0.6953695,0.0033697884,0.0000596555,0.00009606792,0.00019348873,0.19726652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.857775,0.015299841,0.006233548,0.06385299,0.002421157,0.000109053464,0.00004910229,0.00017237208,0.054086894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98608404,0.0060938727,0.000330537,0.0016345098,0.0037181408,0.0021389239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765587,0.0097341845,0.0024806033,0.0019349463,0.0035759113,0.005715713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131047275,0.00019668124,0.0004169088,0.0012521156,0.005540782,0.007035497,0.0012932831,0.0055619753,0.006913172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034349512,0.00044246536,0.00031167426,0.0014313672,0.023601064,0.011100014,0.0040442557,0.009600652,0.0014971045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001695782,0.00009144155,0.0014873319,0.00009392677,0.0000065445533,0.000053282478,0.0075809807,0.00025509793,0.00017113355,0.8860742,0.026935723,0.07723337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004346352,0.00010725917,0.008760247,0.00061975484,0.000008616046,0.00016843526,0.0061841523,0.00045416283,0.0004691724,0.27882954,0.70430094,0.00005431174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015326591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017613636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021048358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021048358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014766491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15271723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256545904","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.389","title":"RECOGNIZING QUEBEC IN THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA: USING THE BILATERAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROCESS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; French; Political science; Constitutional law; Negotiation; Constitutional amendment; Population; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.023199667368727937,"score_gpt":0.21659417120346544,"score_spread":0.1933945038347375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256545904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046499547,0.0074729417,0.019976946,0.097794116,0.0012170713,0.0004100721,0.0008364777,0.00020623008,0.8255866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84285796,0.0034079764,0.020322643,0.01700202,0.00022676503,0.00024048619,0.00034227798,0.00006203533,0.11553784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920169,0.002044604,0.00025310327,0.00083333877,0.0027386895,0.0021133628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946989,0.0018844975,0.00018003887,0.00037421242,0.0022945763,0.00056780584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008734725,0.0004382319,0.00034373344,0.0021187621,0.017366255,0.013748701,0.0019424009,0.005679737,0.004920035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014415181,0.0003782252,0.00036377003,0.0028926933,0.0115937395,0.0031680218,0.003556718,0.0049866824,0.00035706986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009032321,0.0000061186074,0.00065146317,0.000021954978,0.000005598933,0.00017547047,0.004066121,0.0006614802,0.00021904985,0.97039044,0.014106188,0.009687094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057971312,0.000022317961,0.006933972,0.00043282306,0.000057317895,0.0001476734,0.0090179825,0.00293182,0.0006972216,0.13320155,0.8463383,0.00016107658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98327535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8910651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10893487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20014805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79038155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281652745","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0087","title":"Rethinking relational architecture: Interpersonal justice beyond private law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Private law; Interpersonal communication; Law; Political science; Public law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022216035721710926,"score_gpt":0.20841992088579064,"score_spread":0.1862038851640797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281652745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08240375,0.0070302114,0.19272442,0.09147933,0.0007938425,0.00006892959,0.0000804778,0.0002296653,0.6251894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97703177,0.0017116223,0.00875426,0.0021080298,0.00021470775,0.00004462473,0.000027836846,0.00009257462,0.01001467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960413,0.0019550559,0.00010105837,0.0005460271,0.0007957146,0.00056088663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651223,0.0015411049,0.0003160262,0.0007984335,0.0004022849,0.0004300205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004880079,0.00040624433,0.000529425,0.0014520923,0.006989424,0.013676313,0.0019096232,0.0031396525,0.005938594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058777076,0.00036126256,0.00058616727,0.00089462847,0.059510503,0.019431401,0.010177221,0.006510743,0.00060616236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020754662,0.0000026407474,0.000100537436,0.000007940096,0.0000018047257,0.000029879744,0.00441199,0.000089188194,0.000048243728,0.993276,0.0003057288,0.0017241183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004002309,0.000008479266,0.00045349405,0.000060726008,0.00000605085,0.000075451375,0.004543668,0.00062435266,0.000114247516,0.9675252,0.026575387,0.000008891925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01970679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02193307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01970679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01001635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007520145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072674036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283330108","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2021-0091","title":"How victims matter: Rethinking the significance of the victim in criminal theory","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Retributive justice; Criminology; Criminal law; Psychology; Law and economics; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.01627710178796654,"score_gpt":0.19214840109803924,"score_spread":0.1758712993100727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283330108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116854556,0.03668582,0.048327178,0.31481162,0.00447422,0.00013011196,0.00008721618,0.00014651974,0.47848272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596272,0.008821894,0.00289466,0.011360322,0.0013588391,0.00008321052,0.000024676585,0.00018288387,0.015646499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850912,0.010065791,0.00035872732,0.0010810244,0.001978574,0.0014246277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870508,0.009004893,0.0006841845,0.00097590464,0.0013500481,0.0009340757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01650011,0.001048325,0.001520858,0.0038381475,0.013068608,0.016998412,0.005316006,0.010527119,0.0032314062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01715564,0.0009165158,0.0006857093,0.0021166105,0.12898444,0.021052293,0.011235345,0.013821637,0.0005767478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005868013,0.0000072810035,0.00037362732,0.000042006184,0.000004765263,0.00011804623,0.03136765,0.00008698432,0.000025653633,0.96410054,0.0017730625,0.0020945908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031974956,0.000044420784,0.0014083507,0.00056097866,0.00007529254,0.00036762454,0.04280671,0.0009898562,0.00018237495,0.8622149,0.09127278,0.000044692733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052245542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06291072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052245542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022081131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013696839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16021055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286681081","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0107","title":"Rethinking the division of tax room and revenue in fiscal federalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tax credit; Government (linguistics); Politics; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Revenue; Law and economics; Double taxation; Direct tax; Ad valorem tax; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012359437236215645,"score_gpt":0.22566495066236988,"score_spread":0.21330551342615423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286681081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3186323,0.0035781371,0.10086875,0.15180226,0.0010318931,0.000118627344,0.00020324334,0.00017098963,0.42359373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990489,0.0004836988,0.0031739515,0.0015709001,0.00020312853,0.000040442086,0.000012711767,0.000033527667,0.003992683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924217,0.0040018703,0.0002355137,0.0008571198,0.0010310496,0.0014527267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939944,0.0035511076,0.0007277431,0.0008129462,0.0004037956,0.0005099645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103141535,0.00035125454,0.0009851599,0.0012988589,0.0060557853,0.013087447,0.0021808874,0.0065129707,0.0050084544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017929776,0.0007280758,0.001275664,0.0016710868,0.02521507,0.013671552,0.0071147126,0.009334969,0.00038942302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005638224,0.0000067392343,0.00014211534,0.0000044239737,0.0000012683265,0.000008183798,0.00023746699,0.0010404165,0.000019341172,0.9973143,0.00026245997,0.0009576594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022075212,0.000012890978,0.00056068186,0.000057411515,0.000009860037,0.000014923921,0.0005382058,0.004803559,0.00009696212,0.98529565,0.00857117,0.000016653743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027959006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033982184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018036466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011006167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13086438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294811563","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0116","title":"What is purposive interpretation?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Presupposition; Doctrine; Epistemology; Nonprobability sampling; Constitutional interpretation; Set (abstract data type); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010967684414629992,"score_gpt":0.24340022694349536,"score_spread":0.23243254252886536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294811563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012367264,0.023554001,0.15369563,0.33518317,0.005621991,0.00013934042,0.0002473622,0.00024437264,0.4689468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686254,0.013685276,0.03791069,0.045298655,0.010304753,0.0006119004,0.00036273367,0.00055721763,0.022643492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95189124,0.033758223,0.0015362728,0.0039048286,0.00659746,0.0023118935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94755,0.037310116,0.0022223827,0.0064672153,0.0051463083,0.0013039222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039046142,0.0009997798,0.001972072,0.003242784,0.009320477,0.018264217,0.003751252,0.007403921,0.008582604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050412554,0.000871354,0.00154811,0.0042451755,0.08283352,0.03577776,0.0065935156,0.012170182,0.0021875666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005606349,0.0000067182064,0.00010940084,0.000036679972,0.0000052001737,0.000037017788,0.0015763303,0.000051340714,0.000011509725,0.9919333,0.0027890499,0.0034379163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006483866,0.000004595856,0.00007197675,0.000112287176,0.000004054444,0.000059903,0.0010812902,0.00018224669,0.000048763257,0.9737249,0.024695389,0.0000081223425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058849114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003730311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039046142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009109487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009639436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2064982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4305014601","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0047","title":"Private law legalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Private law; Law; Political science; Rationality; Private rights; Law and economics; Public law; Property rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015386625497086276,"score_gpt":0.24837166932680332,"score_spread":0.23298504382971705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4305014601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029856682,0.0026249278,0.079687856,0.10757076,0.0007301462,0.00011793597,0.00016918537,0.00012635933,0.77911615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326283,0.0009973824,0.011997541,0.01206674,0.00079444615,0.00015174501,0.00007839598,0.00006411039,0.04122132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880598,0.0037533105,0.00038648993,0.0024261614,0.003997282,0.0013769341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059814,0.0040239748,0.00075167173,0.0018482395,0.0019521904,0.00082575146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010841492,0.0003971648,0.0005460178,0.00093658257,0.006139398,0.009972995,0.0016706159,0.0072389673,0.0056023407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014782379,0.00048604017,0.0007136743,0.0006595125,0.04613497,0.0077240025,0.0052892286,0.007929179,0.00083293504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001698829,0.000002580916,0.00004098698,0.000006783454,0.0000011855734,0.000012635532,0.0003585283,0.00005149374,0.000027425662,0.9977869,0.0009989659,0.0007108769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012654973,0.000008208716,0.00017319722,0.00004473619,0.0000056219446,0.000053049796,0.00029123042,0.0004925289,0.00017338099,0.95186347,0.046873562,0.000008279366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0127203725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009220807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127203725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012380344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010546193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08982611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306822587","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0056","title":"How important are the groundbreaking cases in administrative law?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Administrative law; Deference; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Standard of review; Concurring opinion; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Precedent; Majority opinion; Certiorari; Judicial opinion; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; History","score_opus":0.042128945546095524,"score_gpt":0.2677486533160273,"score_spread":0.2256197077699318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306822587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32234207,0.029647162,0.0030761664,0.3288652,0.0016453078,0.00010477578,0.00028644572,0.00007226237,0.3139606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97951645,0.0035738389,0.00042450344,0.008850618,0.0004066519,0.000013572397,0.000044633896,0.00002463127,0.007144945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733473,0.00672067,0.0006799628,0.0023019756,0.007994102,0.008955989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9380242,0.034845077,0.007822221,0.0022372154,0.009268177,0.0078030205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017086519,0.00030942942,0.000547639,0.0038855318,0.021231994,0.02384061,0.0024481856,0.005781776,0.0044005327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086546615,0.0006255726,0.00061881455,0.0050080097,0.0458879,0.015250204,0.004186251,0.012214103,0.00045254832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009336318,0.00011733787,0.030104727,0.00024416394,0.000049279988,0.0016057094,0.07765096,0.0006549516,0.0009220628,0.7671627,0.034904465,0.08649027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041965774,0.00014659374,0.23583083,0.0009429716,0.00013355304,0.0010929646,0.11389215,0.00063798594,0.0017050934,0.22481416,0.42053685,0.00022490474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67526114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77383214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67526114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06732442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053669505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6533026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384567723","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0091","title":"How victims matter: Rethinking the significance of the victim in criminal theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Retributive justice; Criminology; Criminal law; Psychology; Law and economics; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.0217242042204304,"score_gpt":0.20741697179260538,"score_spread":0.18569276757217498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384567723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116854556,0.03668582,0.048327178,0.31481162,0.00447422,0.00013011196,0.00008721618,0.00014651974,0.47848272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596272,0.008821894,0.00289466,0.011360322,0.0013588391,0.00008321052,0.000024676585,0.00018288387,0.015646499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850912,0.010065791,0.00035872732,0.0010810244,0.001978574,0.0014246277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870508,0.009004893,0.0006841845,0.00097590464,0.0013500481,0.0009340757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01650011,0.001048325,0.001520858,0.0038381475,0.013068608,0.016998412,0.005316006,0.010527119,0.0032314062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01715564,0.0009165158,0.0006857093,0.0021166105,0.12898444,0.021052293,0.011235345,0.013821637,0.0005767478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005868013,0.0000072810035,0.00037362732,0.000042006184,0.000004765263,0.00011804623,0.03136765,0.00008698432,0.000025653633,0.96410054,0.0017730625,0.0020945908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031974956,0.000044420784,0.0014083507,0.00056097866,0.00007529254,0.00036762454,0.04280671,0.0009898562,0.00018237495,0.8622149,0.09127278,0.000044692733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052245542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06291072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052245542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022081131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013696839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16021055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385577120","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0064","title":"Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Disadvantaged; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Harm; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Law; Algorithm; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.053902923674394095,"score_gpt":0.26727063266057827,"score_spread":0.21336770898618418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385577120","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015555427,0.021522515,0.042162478,0.7455244,0.0018409007,0.000054162836,0.000118544194,0.00008270361,0.17313875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79105526,0.014747646,0.032553777,0.11528982,0.00435901,0.00020091518,0.0001041574,0.000209317,0.041480158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99127686,0.0046227574,0.00025887336,0.0010775811,0.0021979802,0.00056597684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96547645,0.02797311,0.00080114754,0.0016174167,0.0031169122,0.001014918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013666634,0.00048312824,0.00089285546,0.0013115417,0.008386935,0.006931397,0.0013178424,0.0049251625,0.0032220127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04169837,0.00032840951,0.00038695586,0.0017092387,0.036547367,0.009980541,0.0040687076,0.009790443,0.00049968815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008344145,0.000012717672,0.0004940636,0.000021258462,0.000004643702,0.000019017238,0.0010522328,0.0005801684,0.000018670018,0.96187425,0.024373854,0.011540772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008105431,0.0000058350947,0.00040579154,0.00012062501,0.000003971326,0.000018650342,0.0006279732,0.0014991282,0.000076719785,0.9271719,0.07004722,0.000014102635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10218806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10751235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89781195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012789893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012302715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20318651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385829522","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0112","title":"Public nuisance for private persons","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Private law; Liability; Law and economics; Private sphere; Private rights; Political science; Business; Law; Public law; Public sphere; Economics","score_opus":0.0642349668068549,"score_gpt":0.2884805393198329,"score_spread":0.224245572512978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385829522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03360821,0.0015909531,0.06746791,0.026773578,0.00052802655,0.00011959753,0.00015257172,0.0001727898,0.86958635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744822,0.00093756337,0.008268536,0.0062539373,0.00056882604,0.00022717234,0.00012258314,0.00012561165,0.10901351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941095,0.0018661988,0.00021391311,0.0011371718,0.0013313193,0.0013419434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951125,0.0016596036,0.0004691681,0.0017503724,0.00065890054,0.0003494962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044883396,0.00061402965,0.0007394401,0.0010125736,0.007142126,0.010218661,0.0015947007,0.011071999,0.0154706845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008952665,0.0004320574,0.0013294372,0.00066773023,0.022643501,0.01249813,0.007792741,0.0091987075,0.0028954106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003133994,0.000007573955,0.00006480563,0.0000055255878,9.716246e-7,0.000039332175,0.0003873991,0.00005975682,0.000041593517,0.99720323,0.00093947264,0.0012472656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014873098,0.00003777108,0.00040198574,0.00014324962,0.00001570479,0.00030288054,0.0008922573,0.0008038998,0.0005334443,0.8677277,0.1290983,0.000027951412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00428199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044514257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154706845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004240244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058671962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051754594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830333","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0003","title":"Explainability and the Epistemic Division of Labour in Adjudication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Transparency (behavior); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Division of labour; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010235642338196089,"score_gpt":0.2192349413401937,"score_spread":0.2089992990019976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830333","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10485983,0.0060554678,0.52980083,0.13746446,0.0006881754,0.00017250124,0.00027346224,0.00031017358,0.2203751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96692735,0.0006259838,0.02713111,0.0017330875,0.00039975368,0.00012153618,0.000063563275,0.00006813245,0.0029294787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93844944,0.041681785,0.0035712442,0.004829629,0.008055011,0.0034128765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80242354,0.15860133,0.010103545,0.020531941,0.006360721,0.0019789317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05968453,0.0005801525,0.0014229558,0.005277295,0.009906432,0.014413286,0.0034164202,0.009202793,0.0056428853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12315883,0.0011327125,0.0015136149,0.0031651922,0.080885544,0.029265674,0.012257054,0.008656368,0.0005851837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009611373,0.0000041063818,0.00023267421,0.000015666505,0.000003976536,0.000030157194,0.0017160878,0.0002997605,0.000027310622,0.9953087,0.0002921474,0.002059868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012913064,0.0000040613236,0.00017963193,0.000047486414,0.0000054095512,0.000025068439,0.0004405669,0.00097268133,0.00008683194,0.9946128,0.0036027534,0.000009993946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010420093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010569466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010973795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010222748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31564575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830349","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0006","title":"Problems with Probability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Settlement (finance); Probabilistic logic; Liability; Triage; Resolution (logic); Balance (ability); Legal liability; Computer science; Actuarial science; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Economics; Psychology; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.042545828120874464,"score_gpt":0.2729816347433351,"score_spread":0.23043580662246063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830349","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060660886,0.05547585,0.42248917,0.26874268,0.009082561,0.0002502999,0.0011405406,0.00053918955,0.23621355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59097344,0.044799857,0.17814253,0.073827304,0.057013832,0.0014148277,0.000802318,0.0009951626,0.05203068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96472234,0.015551071,0.0021088063,0.0073743802,0.009017559,0.0012258114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8120236,0.16149461,0.0039346414,0.011106271,0.010015778,0.0014251095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042682618,0.0019178907,0.0035657876,0.0045851716,0.0057003913,0.01062171,0.006472042,0.010323343,0.021900946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13733473,0.0013636488,0.0036479258,0.0044018575,0.04116885,0.031338714,0.0076610697,0.02534471,0.005616959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013302209,0.000008126298,0.00026653736,0.00010667296,0.000023702469,0.000062371735,0.00024018636,0.0006099699,0.000014855021,0.9827382,0.0085473005,0.0073689716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009617302,0.0000054904394,0.000059101687,0.000058321955,0.000005250593,0.0001077268,0.00005453376,0.00091008,0.000025014564,0.98307496,0.015677635,0.00001221341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00861343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028228585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042682618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008851148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044269487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22572994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830373","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0005","title":"Courts as Data Guardians for the Public Good","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Public records; Government (linguistics); Workflow; Business; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.11631886042939898,"score_gpt":0.3531896412349339,"score_spread":0.23687078080553492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830373","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048988283,0.01301694,0.06819872,0.56627256,0.002334834,0.00027767548,0.00051098986,0.00045340153,0.2999465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8927243,0.0064221816,0.012841284,0.042979244,0.0022443007,0.00020690724,0.00022578848,0.0002063167,0.0421496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95408934,0.02311548,0.0027365044,0.0068239802,0.0087452335,0.0044895466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8866277,0.06731408,0.00848174,0.014841591,0.016049545,0.0066853436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03861562,0.00047230505,0.0010165263,0.003007132,0.011411102,0.03463425,0.0035501532,0.013905772,0.010524507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09159984,0.0012500874,0.00060186716,0.003576292,0.037001334,0.03596056,0.015788302,0.014609944,0.0022195512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022379852,0.000008626343,0.0013023564,0.00003812849,0.000009573511,0.0001516938,0.0045403913,0.00018213365,0.00010731967,0.97250766,0.010473519,0.010656396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042774172,0.000030129591,0.0010566168,0.00046853363,0.00005104753,0.00020703333,0.006426776,0.0011711711,0.0007752652,0.64808035,0.3416117,0.000078597695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02752412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020122666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03861562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013047763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027449125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20422143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830377","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0004","title":"Contractual Howlers: A Russian Bond Case Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bond; Order (exchange); Meaning (existential); Literal and figurative language; Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.029088612063656025,"score_gpt":0.2105053900414622,"score_spread":0.1814167779778062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789488,0.0003905387,0.0022898673,0.0012569631,0.000012894417,0.000036425026,0.00003344149,0.00000822415,0.01702301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963934,0.0003069795,0.00077763456,0.00011520814,0.000006492827,0.000023358769,0.00001855891,0.0000070891183,0.002351239],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949673,0.0035732992,0.00020058674,0.0003145028,0.00045478946,0.00048960594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960091,0.0025408522,0.0006627195,0.0002908876,0.00027402616,0.00022227195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045856135,0.00035284305,0.0005284086,0.0006503161,0.010899618,0.003061418,0.0010180556,0.003253413,0.0019069086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008143078,0.0004148291,0.0003357063,0.0013178054,0.005331899,0.0030763026,0.0028361038,0.0030719829,0.000357391],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021719994,0.00022935745,0.026803456,0.00013606186,0.000029972289,0.018256105,0.6599457,0.0013917298,0.0026891122,0.27305457,0.0024474969,0.014799219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057277146,0.00032542917,0.034737527,0.0004553104,0.000060541628,0.011800464,0.8118552,0.007525217,0.003508465,0.029740425,0.09981435,0.00011982064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016088082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014602127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016088082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036917268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013327472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03198886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830382","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0007","title":"Access to Justice and Civil-Procedural Bargaining","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Procedural justice; Political science; Psychological intervention; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Law and economics; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03697158666923104,"score_gpt":0.2247608322656042,"score_spread":0.18778924559637317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037329353,0.00386578,0.085274674,0.023820765,0.00031444727,0.00012857803,0.00007980387,0.000109438326,0.84907705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96280247,0.0014518505,0.0058276323,0.0021477933,0.00021951502,0.00010628566,0.00003483562,0.00004968016,0.027359998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817555,0.0068294103,0.0006131435,0.0022154348,0.0042330404,0.0043535433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117416,0.0050745686,0.0008856195,0.0012434318,0.0008305617,0.0007917717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013971999,0.00048447074,0.000675819,0.0014914903,0.009262051,0.015170251,0.0029989292,0.0065400708,0.01339125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019490073,0.0004000766,0.00086712296,0.0021735406,0.05578254,0.010349039,0.009103618,0.007125375,0.0012179607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017092126,0.000002932458,0.000044136617,0.0000056183558,0.0000012105716,0.000017157987,0.00061504205,0.00016782168,0.000013003481,0.9978417,0.0002137963,0.0010757805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008214888,0.00000845208,0.0002765402,0.00009325744,0.0000049385008,0.00004134507,0.0010115361,0.00089132116,0.000096084885,0.971117,0.026435394,0.000015841591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05913518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04297801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05913518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01576341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01576776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117581904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830403","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0002","title":"An Evidence-Based Approach to Private Ordering","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Incentive; Bargaining power; Law and economics; Arbitration; Private information retrieval; Ex-ante; Business; Imperfect; Economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04934786125561251,"score_gpt":0.21232620027880708,"score_spread":0.16297833902319458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058165984,0.085016616,0.47225273,0.25119805,0.0040719924,0.0016249375,0.002343358,0.00028514763,0.17739064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48524955,0.06178969,0.37992784,0.047197904,0.0066295387,0.0025347648,0.0016197357,0.00014316237,0.01490778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90908736,0.056182254,0.006922454,0.009856639,0.01649888,0.0014524146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6946664,0.24779278,0.011828347,0.021869758,0.02149534,0.0023474207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11397442,0.0020926143,0.0036686587,0.016110264,0.003470778,0.013479158,0.008276673,0.014463668,0.010042707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18791226,0.0013368375,0.0033843978,0.007448207,0.029932683,0.02085501,0.007815796,0.016620371,0.0021380964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006751849,0.000088558016,0.0012703456,0.0018416636,0.00036690445,0.000672586,0.00052987254,0.0023395757,0.00018097684,0.9458301,0.0072447206,0.039567176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054426644,0.00005614882,0.00033850255,0.0024622004,0.00012817707,0.00029677156,0.0002161119,0.0020041743,0.00027600725,0.95214623,0.04197363,0.000047645703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006105717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005862667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11397442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012470676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020627197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60276157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830409","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0014","title":"The Counterintuitive Consequences of Sex Offender Risk Assessments at Sentencing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Counterintuitive; Psychology; Risk assessment; Sentence; Criminology; Sentencing guidelines; Social psychology; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.025593429787216453,"score_gpt":0.30059076041138255,"score_spread":0.2749973306241661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.951698,0.00015960846,0.009355008,0.010923108,0.00020690908,0.00017727097,0.00016493729,0.00009689425,0.027218232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909059,0.000046237936,0.0051733116,0.001472175,0.000070656686,0.00007349929,0.00003204794,0.00002808594,0.0021981741],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765929,0.01222784,0.0014928664,0.0017717555,0.006005349,0.0019092432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9539681,0.03253527,0.00503484,0.002711964,0.004525424,0.0012243544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011497035,0.00029233613,0.00023337404,0.0013053605,0.0029033332,0.0024351405,0.001072649,0.0017336955,0.0021176795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08393677,0.00041133663,0.0006096578,0.0006366125,0.0023114625,0.0022843806,0.0022774998,0.0036313822,0.0003213808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002820782,0.0018803383,0.3983225,0.0005329739,0.000576391,0.0039513786,0.05320013,0.01782405,0.028046895,0.12926918,0.028739149,0.33483618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022089123,0.0026940822,0.80425006,0.0006084528,0.0003792931,0.0023436893,0.023033766,0.020430373,0.027951257,0.07744511,0.040255684,0.00038737166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015886817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04735307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015886817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027376777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001892996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060802877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830852","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0071","title":"The Reconciliation Project of Labour Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Indigenous; Sociology; Democracy; Law; Capitalism; Narrative; Equity (law); Normative; Law reform; Political science; Private law; Law and economics; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.02412989270591382,"score_gpt":0.2854735803885939,"score_spread":0.26134368768268007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07660892,0.006503517,0.067231104,0.07117104,0.0005584149,0.00023184658,0.00007565242,0.00030149517,0.77731806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96844906,0.00096406863,0.0070465803,0.0026202302,0.00013983886,0.000095407566,0.000038845406,0.000054674223,0.02059128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98020786,0.010247905,0.0004074935,0.0018067204,0.0041279937,0.0032020744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945972,0.0019932294,0.00039096776,0.0010512049,0.0014532652,0.000514181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01660574,0.00049229,0.0007437143,0.0025943962,0.020046117,0.016160317,0.0030513315,0.004508102,0.0030521774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013778715,0.0003228087,0.0004854435,0.0024374863,0.081624106,0.0076934365,0.012016353,0.007366254,0.0003313102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034849197,0.0000052460223,0.000115593924,0.00001236116,0.000002043566,0.000039649753,0.00962561,0.00018718441,0.000033034623,0.9828986,0.0011075349,0.0059697162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143101715,0.000026126716,0.0010515687,0.00018684562,0.000013899567,0.00010108878,0.015886497,0.001187068,0.00029827846,0.77251184,0.20869373,0.000028718703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3097718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2615277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3097718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0512006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08367096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6159375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386744342","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0027","title":"A milestone in Canadian legal history","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Lakehead University; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Milestone; Indigenous; Law; Legal history; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010587496698634196,"score_gpt":0.19624311569554193,"score_spread":0.18565561899690772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386744342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007876831,0.23980363,0.0017976532,0.18979761,0.009594581,0.00007160061,0.00044342558,0.00010315406,0.5505115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35041505,0.3473263,0.007356363,0.036322653,0.0042795753,0.00010863661,0.00058558997,0.00023336537,0.25337246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946957,0.00052279903,0.000111067726,0.00041238026,0.0031902783,0.0010676549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995698,0.0006576966,0.0001409894,0.00010588317,0.0026135393,0.0007838547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026540477,0.00056405907,0.0005137652,0.004863289,0.016922083,0.014077169,0.0018710197,0.0025847787,0.011697518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063998657,0.00030726637,0.0003797312,0.008861014,0.0146377105,0.0055071427,0.0025987383,0.00340296,0.0010361508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020428568,0.000008833562,0.0008949818,0.0004297613,0.000009452404,0.00025987916,0.016814118,0.00020328704,0.00013503972,0.7003138,0.20153399,0.07937639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016399649,0.0000028158686,0.0013013302,0.00042487017,0.00000484333,0.00005801488,0.003916143,0.000038640348,0.000038728853,0.010437075,0.9837638,0.000012002536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98359287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16861884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16861884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21418017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387130733","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0017","title":"Reconstructing <i>Gladue</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Complicity; Blame; Prison; Criminology; Accountability; Political science; Supreme court; Impunity; Law; Jury; Sociology; Restorative justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Human rights","score_opus":0.018609392712293383,"score_gpt":0.2589954752653462,"score_spread":0.24038608255305283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387130733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017951265,0.0057476717,0.011246572,0.6620012,0.00939589,0.000115100374,0.00055291085,0.0003804996,0.29260883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27723172,0.0018543744,0.009236834,0.5370951,0.0014271574,0.00016414633,0.0002001363,0.00024492116,0.1725456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934161,0.0011174384,0.0001646935,0.0009435493,0.0020399042,0.002318387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966175,0.0010933728,0.00022750985,0.00029735797,0.0012309916,0.0005333524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004617063,0.0006501687,0.00049346266,0.0011094676,0.011574651,0.0148487,0.004844761,0.01792133,0.003418481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012447279,0.00063592993,0.0008652598,0.00076832366,0.025052538,0.005665383,0.0043365103,0.033738784,0.0012754095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025750554,0.000020644318,0.0005327796,0.000050761897,0.0000052675223,0.0002468942,0.010572583,0.00023476452,0.00026810056,0.8027447,0.1758524,0.009445396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017453334,0.000023068018,0.0011767091,0.00024199099,0.000013478971,0.0001891082,0.008111416,0.00057989813,0.00041714552,0.07661113,0.9125285,0.00009009488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66591537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78862804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97822225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021777734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034182362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67210424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667228","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0060","title":"The Autonomy of Administration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Autonomy; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Doctrine; Presumption; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.018280407148459875,"score_gpt":0.27629386433761677,"score_spread":0.2580134571891569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018687973,0.007970555,0.05624638,0.16969685,0.0012706718,0.00008299692,0.00008742803,0.00026557167,0.74569166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8609457,0.0030437955,0.008643831,0.024795083,0.0016161376,0.00020562744,0.00008042631,0.00016703655,0.100502275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98261845,0.007928873,0.00068099133,0.002937558,0.0035663655,0.00226768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989106,0.004148341,0.00088565814,0.0023010296,0.0016283471,0.001930665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011331097,0.00036678844,0.0004861998,0.0008194447,0.006716618,0.0141256815,0.001320425,0.004424835,0.0036859824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014239738,0.0004350736,0.0007007148,0.00061821705,0.032887436,0.008360873,0.00785101,0.009342782,0.0016913062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037667567,0.000003889582,0.000102969156,0.000007739725,0.0000020489738,0.000015199441,0.0014640416,0.00006683272,0.000077152035,0.99254143,0.0030240386,0.0026909187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011462855,0.000019953612,0.00048423602,0.00010046984,0.0000056072595,0.00006781715,0.00071649003,0.00034661833,0.00021494669,0.5998964,0.3981157,0.000020415036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009168176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005974349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141256815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007769166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016392965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05992526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667245","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0063","title":"The Independence of the Judiciary and Some of Its Enemies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Democracy; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Supreme court; Miller; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015509600138397353,"score_gpt":0.23616337561439815,"score_spread":0.2206537754760008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022187274,0.01725171,0.0029645497,0.8546523,0.0011575938,0.000008756136,0.000044946206,0.000022761973,0.101710185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88359416,0.008991141,0.0014324383,0.08057543,0.003570788,0.000037834565,0.000034265446,0.000054475488,0.02170947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98886824,0.0044773933,0.00040638755,0.0009410821,0.002591079,0.0027158158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793382,0.012587807,0.0014860703,0.0015585471,0.0022281471,0.0028012653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014710495,0.00039284967,0.0007609069,0.0012011577,0.01341049,0.0153396875,0.0018396641,0.009612316,0.0043133013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019528471,0.00073282485,0.0005418104,0.0013701969,0.055761576,0.011960291,0.0063055176,0.025070328,0.0010112046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047873105,0.000020326655,0.0007715265,0.00005939081,0.000010444413,0.00015921067,0.009831031,0.000107084896,0.00014551355,0.9445219,0.032282945,0.012042693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044490873,0.00005021094,0.0084067695,0.00055846386,0.0000174109,0.00026692182,0.013069615,0.00044333423,0.00046089312,0.59916437,0.3774094,0.000108107626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06232663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073227555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06232663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015716316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011277175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12392771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667261","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0066","title":"Reflections on ‘Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Supreme court; Social equality; Economic Justice; Social justice; Law; Algorithm; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14908466407441157,"score_gpt":0.4130959155791495,"score_spread":0.2640112515047379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667261","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002397675,0.008825262,0.002737432,0.9429248,0.000979301,0.000010150832,0.000045970868,0.000016242439,0.04206328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41377908,0.010686347,0.0063006347,0.5244877,0.0054234816,0.00006969548,0.00006844679,0.00016104837,0.03902365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98411834,0.006173455,0.00036048974,0.0015925642,0.005242487,0.0025126287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97240543,0.020944627,0.000608803,0.0009539501,0.0035134887,0.0015736117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016170887,0.0004955929,0.00087729056,0.0013229065,0.01348231,0.01534169,0.003282214,0.015586149,0.006359134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0431227,0.0004256914,0.00051683554,0.0015830029,0.06755152,0.013302541,0.0048539634,0.022583254,0.00085925794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008222876,0.0000072075213,0.0001357956,0.000025212275,0.0000040962514,0.00002072719,0.0027907875,0.0002315612,0.00003199968,0.91937387,0.071698286,0.0056722653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001686624,0.000009646364,0.000504419,0.00025668988,0.0000050946323,0.000043296695,0.0031799458,0.00054868317,0.00025398633,0.57553005,0.41960502,0.000046315352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5202183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52928716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4797817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03967912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042497467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96521443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667268","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0062","title":"The Joy of Justice: <i>Les Misérables</i> and Rosalie Abella","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Universalism; Doctrine; Pragmatism; Law; Economic Justice; Autocracy; Law and economics; Realism; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.01700146489031163,"score_gpt":0.251302037658309,"score_spread":0.23430057276799737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032789118,0.031352278,0.0008270483,0.9096965,0.003826688,0.00000699029,0.0000169239,0.000021609449,0.050973117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59628296,0.026463768,0.0023803038,0.27104512,0.008996096,0.000059776434,0.000026215597,0.00015589756,0.094589785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938286,0.003758226,0.00011393483,0.0005722991,0.0010857165,0.0006412714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342316,0.0042718076,0.00031516826,0.00026737145,0.00082092104,0.0009016023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072488496,0.00038290577,0.0006418644,0.00069741835,0.015332824,0.010240025,0.0009913652,0.005891518,0.0018717519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01282495,0.00037788387,0.0002287046,0.00055963174,0.024446698,0.007407718,0.0028722056,0.016259184,0.00081067777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024275756,0.00001618691,0.0002922651,0.00003979005,0.000006221796,0.00012874726,0.01074973,0.00006594356,0.000088133565,0.70971614,0.27232608,0.0065464834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013406469,0.000012283463,0.0006343551,0.00027396996,0.0000071095506,0.00016858376,0.008388687,0.00021180422,0.00021147804,0.23582835,0.75420797,0.00004202465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04092437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06626455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009335252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008656236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08137232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667270","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0089","title":"Editor’s Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.014960917419215814,"score_gpt":0.26065816797123514,"score_spread":0.24569725055201933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667270","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041108742,0.0014940262,0.00006651102,0.069464415,0.9239296,0.00003484039,0.00015959318,0.000057385645,0.0047525037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013163005,0.0021050074,0.0002355723,0.1598627,0.74596804,0.00013913926,0.000159784,0.00010102074,0.090112515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154973,0.0009616259,0.00077638315,0.0011642128,0.0045619,0.0009861945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688721,0.007811871,0.0025213046,0.001769703,0.014572904,0.004452089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007649362,0.002357115,0.0024301857,0.0047752676,0.0048166984,0.008935489,0.004445838,0.020555126,0.10521866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05301078,0.0011868977,0.0029987523,0.0019703563,0.0025720347,0.0033439144,0.0028909678,0.015578024,0.046652224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008171808,0.0000033868505,0.0000146930615,0.000055943106,0.000003994078,0.000034716126,0.000006911811,0.000008267086,0.000014400301,0.00021129868,0.9978695,0.0017687521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026487898,0.000010616577,0.00026305203,0.00025943184,0.000015725382,0.00006808058,0.000042257965,0.000039817918,0.000058506055,0.0005455399,0.9986559,0.0000144932155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055880435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016427353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10521866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00511128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007925975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35199147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667275","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0069","title":"The Administration of Justice: Justice Rosalie Abella’s Contribution to Canadian Administrative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Economic Justice; Legislation; Sociology; Principle of legality; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.029819710840239086,"score_gpt":0.3002272643422826,"score_spread":0.2704075535020435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667275","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014564182,0.02334064,0.001346112,0.8120496,0.005254919,0.000054342087,0.000107610875,0.000077370736,0.14320527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5932703,0.02408558,0.004026932,0.23520455,0.002523508,0.00008197058,0.000087018896,0.00021348959,0.14050658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98973405,0.001875256,0.00016014824,0.0009290337,0.004170814,0.0031307663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153495,0.0023786125,0.00019560568,0.00025837537,0.003025969,0.0026065318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006502193,0.00045638942,0.0006208671,0.0022626724,0.05559039,0.012477538,0.0028053937,0.0069899536,0.0037762602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138323,0.0005667671,0.00045706925,0.0027731103,0.028425075,0.0037891062,0.003754051,0.012668003,0.0004958055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019072371,0.000035564495,0.0013360116,0.00006961576,0.000014300275,0.00035772895,0.033734802,0.00022741563,0.00021207174,0.50873834,0.4343625,0.020892559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009423203,0.0000074398013,0.0028601238,0.00014097495,0.00001305346,0.00012886807,0.013577233,0.00021948472,0.00014792108,0.025899865,0.9569158,0.00007972213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99164236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18235059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18235059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26203907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9483574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667287","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0073","title":"Substantive Equality and Its Remedial Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Focus (optics); Social equality; Economic Justice; Gender equity; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Inequality; Law; Social science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03552002745116641,"score_gpt":0.28295883661936505,"score_spread":0.24743880916819863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02704688,0.014089648,0.20906238,0.24173345,0.0025256947,0.000091218164,0.00017863534,0.00024272635,0.5050294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93297577,0.002168629,0.029629523,0.01354084,0.00153455,0.00017304138,0.000060583676,0.00016549558,0.019751575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875448,0.006094681,0.00060958497,0.0020744982,0.0025324493,0.0011440449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98506063,0.010204481,0.0007109121,0.0023431869,0.0012769531,0.00040382176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015146249,0.0006236242,0.0007878371,0.0013421255,0.0058973245,0.008418763,0.0021935022,0.00766207,0.008823027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04120758,0.0004727742,0.00090492127,0.00095737964,0.05436838,0.01445118,0.0073396782,0.009691931,0.00096953113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030577012,0.0000027315039,0.000053885084,0.0000066196303,0.0000020679263,0.000008207812,0.00017940842,0.00016646663,0.000012694541,0.9967032,0.000868717,0.0019928901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054288116,0.000004475365,0.00007562954,0.00002651335,0.0000022070565,0.000011698277,0.000087568056,0.0004065475,0.00006268248,0.99111205,0.008200207,0.0000049413397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006152922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061967946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015146249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053410567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08010203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387901656","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0082","title":"Ableism’s new clothes: Achievements and challenges for disability rights in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Ableism; Medical model of disability; Normative; Disability studies; Scholarship; Inclusion (mineral); Ideology; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Normalization (sociology); Political science; Politics; Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Convention; Gender studies; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.039474078018174506,"score_gpt":0.2662170139979951,"score_spread":0.22674293597982056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387901656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100602426,0.019647166,0.0029398482,0.400254,0.0014037227,0.00008921387,0.00047714898,0.00008681625,0.47449964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90966463,0.01113895,0.0014642718,0.01838638,0.0001910726,0.000034398592,0.00012917366,0.00006522329,0.05892589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930535,0.0007286841,0.000103145256,0.00041149688,0.0021674987,0.0035357152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945642,0.0010306061,0.00015153059,0.00018860445,0.0017394695,0.0023256391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004137248,0.00044005914,0.00056866504,0.002472435,0.034013905,0.016185034,0.002259669,0.0038369426,0.009821737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008506613,0.0003451869,0.00059795706,0.0036869193,0.022238225,0.0044170464,0.0069647715,0.0077079176,0.00035344902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034002194,0.000026033911,0.0029754597,0.00011577389,0.000017314627,0.00037283092,0.023140816,0.00054844003,0.00015548266,0.8807799,0.04868024,0.043153606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033228975,0.000026189296,0.011592363,0.0006795106,0.00004317103,0.00017072323,0.09199712,0.0013062226,0.0004246694,0.13061303,0.7629598,0.00015394963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99883026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22691396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22691396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41386107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8966702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911209","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0043","title":"A person suffering: On danger and care in mental health law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive detention; Mental health law; Law; Mental health; Jurisdiction; Involuntary treatment; Harm; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03443700117604496,"score_gpt":0.32411988488266374,"score_spread":0.28968288370661877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0403109,0.024989767,0.005436571,0.42587748,0.0013644896,0.00012699352,0.00007255663,0.000032976524,0.50178826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82508105,0.01370578,0.0021416284,0.118246764,0.002213669,0.0001466746,0.000051037474,0.00003901448,0.03837442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318296,0.0029741146,0.00020862334,0.00033392885,0.0017416487,0.0015588187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948801,0.0037967719,0.00027123734,0.00014907238,0.0004669363,0.00043594945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005449559,0.0003902079,0.00046426503,0.0012662647,0.017309079,0.010267371,0.0027112,0.020027231,0.0038165094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008331928,0.00040640705,0.00060369156,0.0012121282,0.07235984,0.010376859,0.00914586,0.014726731,0.00030198137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032832604,0.0000095778105,0.0001794207,0.000019071069,8.6609e-7,0.00023414266,0.010438675,0.000052617102,0.000023946408,0.98339593,0.004237466,0.0014050049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029335339,0.00004298224,0.0014499889,0.00072396843,0.000012313936,0.00044975703,0.0242166,0.00051318476,0.00011215609,0.777406,0.1949985,0.00004517587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22745994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26374382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22745994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03263951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025998576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45227194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911532","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0056","title":"Against moralism in anti-discrimination law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Private law; Politics; Instrumentalism; Statutory law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05002326567264085,"score_gpt":0.3009886832183637,"score_spread":0.2509654175457228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020464107,0.0049450104,0.0455082,0.431718,0.0023302173,0.00008492609,0.00006387362,0.00016854508,0.49471715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.806631,0.001962554,0.012331587,0.13889891,0.004418232,0.0004089883,0.000047983838,0.00020010165,0.035100475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97945297,0.010178764,0.00047462923,0.0021695497,0.005857603,0.0018665021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845702,0.009654356,0.001123132,0.001374598,0.0023324483,0.0009451849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021647625,0.0006564967,0.00083518773,0.0017848553,0.007876424,0.0096203135,0.0023706488,0.015552035,0.0046655564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023586784,0.00051201455,0.0012280272,0.00083874556,0.059672464,0.010060258,0.006646894,0.025763169,0.0012677122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002094364,0.000007312203,0.000038422208,0.000009609307,0.0000016278179,0.00001534225,0.00042707505,0.000056209716,0.000022862743,0.99693763,0.0017402931,0.0007415042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017918963,0.000009926898,0.000083890474,0.00006898932,0.0000032913806,0.000027039776,0.0002551482,0.00035484708,0.000094793664,0.96666825,0.032406572,0.000009354656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026147522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001923529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021647625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006157163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061377604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114484906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911625","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0023","title":"Interpreting Dicey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; History; Democracy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017460022971329724,"score_gpt":0.256647569993155,"score_spread":0.2391875470218253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010637784,0.01816537,0.006484596,0.15251903,0.008197837,0.000050333074,0.0004936395,0.00015433268,0.80329704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44372413,0.013182631,0.008023093,0.088190004,0.0059271157,0.00024200382,0.0005835689,0.00043772193,0.4396898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641645,0.0012102192,0.0001379182,0.0007128248,0.0009643217,0.00055831793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973031,0.0016019949,0.00015713362,0.0002229967,0.0005531795,0.00016152833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032721346,0.00042041246,0.0005140665,0.0019640576,0.007651173,0.008752219,0.0012321391,0.004079529,0.010361886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012217532,0.00039298847,0.00026290948,0.0022587324,0.009710517,0.005772428,0.0035175104,0.0042155623,0.0016764652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011120744,0.0000033974818,0.00017399684,0.000049781902,0.0000025563077,0.0001321603,0.007237935,0.00006199229,0.00004371434,0.78016406,0.2040265,0.008092763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023598432,0.0000033376095,0.00011829576,0.000096797274,0.0000017858583,0.00007149775,0.0017956012,0.000061181985,0.00009325145,0.031348817,0.9663993,0.0000077724035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021838648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036117055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021838648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100162085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004505355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07267296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388143396","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0057","title":"Lessons from the American Innocence Projects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Redress; Criminal justice; Injustice; Law; Legalism (Western philosophy); Culpability; Context (archaeology); Political science; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Narrative; Imprisonment; History; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.035658266066478685,"score_gpt":0.3040701322674209,"score_spread":0.2684118662009422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388143396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01314072,0.33113882,0.0014946623,0.23955467,0.005340405,0.000016724023,0.00006173457,0.00005409579,0.40919808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41897258,0.40491194,0.0029093025,0.075337276,0.006734484,0.00012050659,0.000161173,0.00018451191,0.0906681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652904,0.0014707096,0.00009180612,0.00028343152,0.0011090625,0.0005158958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940521,0.0033975053,0.0002523638,0.00035272562,0.0011410515,0.0008042155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006418875,0.00041928262,0.0006401257,0.002589602,0.008076178,0.011715652,0.0012233199,0.0041983207,0.005156687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064668464,0.00028498436,0.00032495992,0.0035939936,0.012244885,0.010046724,0.0050527393,0.008506082,0.0010331474],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016432492,0.000060329297,0.00047627895,0.0002614267,0.000008655394,0.00011986168,0.012300235,0.000090082445,0.00006378269,0.8072314,0.086658016,0.092713356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002594276,0.000009024602,0.0008853606,0.0007134139,0.0000050365707,0.00008028482,0.0060468055,0.00004148456,0.000055068816,0.06948329,0.9226665,0.0000111641075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038201254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052896608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038201254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009600172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014276154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075957775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390939528","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0020","title":"Subsidiary and the structure of property law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Public property; Law and economics; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Law; Private law; Private property; Political science; Common law; Property rights; Public law; Business; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.009040956041293341,"score_gpt":0.23063285207405976,"score_spread":0.2215918960327664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390939528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060238816,0.0034977533,0.14264894,0.012313582,0.00028269118,0.000205723,0.000089552974,0.00016920442,0.78055376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573868,0.0011779757,0.014942335,0.0009337584,0.00034353818,0.00018053873,0.000067393456,0.000052332234,0.02491533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957468,0.0015696286,0.00018692875,0.00078837527,0.0010912368,0.0006169941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951782,0.002481675,0.00054451724,0.00090954365,0.00058535894,0.00030072645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003814423,0.0002599645,0.0005315745,0.0021115257,0.0039382456,0.0072021126,0.0011794796,0.002568193,0.006757709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070766867,0.0003915426,0.0005694572,0.0012186407,0.031867705,0.0099435095,0.004201677,0.0039239153,0.0009207179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.953635e-7,0.0000016218734,0.000030566654,0.000002166747,3.1758387e-7,0.0000066351163,0.000139149,0.00004661534,0.000015968526,0.99907494,0.00011774829,0.0005634003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011514542,0.00001103717,0.00016195199,0.000025304675,0.000002289175,0.00003302896,0.0001348635,0.000568444,0.000070342394,0.9787998,0.020176806,0.0000045827246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031073226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020583959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072021126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006294822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004524075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045672297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390957819","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0056","title":"Appellate review of foreign law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Deference; Common law; Law of the case; Precedent; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.012266900019474995,"score_gpt":0.26173264205854985,"score_spread":0.24946574203907484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390957819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060831867,0.17483322,0.013222753,0.12053438,0.031568926,0.0031741923,0.004356196,0.0009333354,0.64529383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14431949,0.19927955,0.016651195,0.070573576,0.016373266,0.0018264661,0.006013025,0.0005044105,0.54445904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95744604,0.0055666217,0.004037536,0.0022318966,0.02713568,0.0035821216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8472322,0.012243127,0.0037345053,0.0088843545,0.123629004,0.004276851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030300817,0.00077278377,0.0015917373,0.015002264,0.0060386313,0.010160949,0.0037137414,0.0064214305,0.011569623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08861416,0.0007708292,0.0009951404,0.010972119,0.0051811184,0.0023770763,0.0029301068,0.0036129977,0.008196065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036915786,0.000030365514,0.0016865493,0.0020329151,0.00009362224,0.0009168635,0.0013463416,0.00030363767,0.0013786452,0.051761825,0.8226919,0.117720425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041622116,0.000007045257,0.0017730661,0.00057109864,0.000023075363,0.00007697747,0.00010226422,0.00012201582,0.00020259037,0.0012952485,0.99580646,0.000016044438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50379777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65399945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50379777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036347494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14975129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390957837","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0124","title":"Time for a pluralist approach? Judicial review of non-state decision makers in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Private law; Jurisdiction; Public law; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Administrative law; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.010678757702769924,"score_gpt":0.2579974893549134,"score_spread":0.24731873165214346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390957837","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25894836,0.023011588,0.0075753746,0.4720552,0.0015519344,0.0004112093,0.00032993106,0.000119956334,0.23599645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96356314,0.0036981928,0.003243486,0.014642769,0.00023363646,0.00007192321,0.00006420439,0.000039967512,0.014442698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96919245,0.0061993883,0.0014312693,0.0029910032,0.011468378,0.0087174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353208,0.025859423,0.0034417515,0.002063793,0.023482474,0.009831773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02374106,0.00027995728,0.0009805771,0.0026675467,0.029363425,0.0205683,0.00416609,0.0058989627,0.0036534115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07743126,0.0007491326,0.00048856146,0.004295662,0.01565668,0.0048203017,0.0058068912,0.007429129,0.00026946375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013153342,0.00010453907,0.017375533,0.00044133395,0.00012097544,0.0013250686,0.054623935,0.0033351528,0.0010141908,0.7299676,0.08878791,0.1027723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023481254,0.00013224263,0.06360018,0.0019560966,0.0002635432,0.0005044493,0.07800992,0.011966884,0.002693422,0.22024897,0.6197468,0.0006426489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9744391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98937315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1655861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1655861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4015185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96780187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390957838","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0047","title":"Abysmal jurisprudence: On the genesis of John Finnis’s practical guide to statesmen","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Humanity; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Law; Action (physics); Epistemology; Transcendental number; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02703113758526892,"score_gpt":0.26316192122048887,"score_spread":0.23613078363521994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390957838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02801874,0.027891152,0.04109819,0.2643295,0.0034545192,0.000099410485,0.000058643735,0.00019808106,0.63485193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8431145,0.004596462,0.014608167,0.028415965,0.0013463964,0.00022912803,0.000033369088,0.00018004217,0.107475966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992339,0.0051294533,0.00015661906,0.0006528623,0.0011869307,0.0005350105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630356,0.0026226714,0.00015647794,0.0002027085,0.00044008525,0.00027447392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077962377,0.0006305568,0.00053754094,0.0014844347,0.014140171,0.0065088896,0.0016154398,0.0063047768,0.0043082666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009325312,0.0004308254,0.00033315265,0.0009267261,0.052630078,0.0076023247,0.0052333726,0.009329661,0.0010156513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025153436,0.0000064447163,0.000026576283,0.000011137499,7.0727884e-7,0.00003404099,0.008086798,0.00004519282,0.000033323795,0.98479664,0.005120322,0.0018363221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007814284,0.000015365278,0.00011175275,0.00019565375,0.0000015985279,0.000077761586,0.0050858804,0.00038732053,0.00009714267,0.6379139,0.35608828,0.000017535369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0143374745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0208491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0143374745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009883083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064065983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07170719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399155853","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2023_0152","title":"On lizard pumps and the self-determination of Karen Knop","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Courage; Supreme court; Diversity (politics); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.005249701019471866,"score_gpt":0.20070226948507108,"score_spread":0.19545256846559922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399155853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075569585,0.06988974,0.0014250504,0.42274612,0.0038242016,0.000023482778,0.000049431277,0.000045674104,0.4264268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.807205,0.029497297,0.0006769497,0.031467624,0.0014474312,0.000026133179,0.000016014536,0.000051874034,0.12961169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987915,0.00055549905,0.00001746235,0.00014540118,0.0002871603,0.00020290467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989423,0.00051831553,0.00007030179,0.00004690653,0.0002289833,0.00019327636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018154425,0.00020891018,0.00023366237,0.00064397557,0.00996657,0.005474685,0.0007042536,0.0018781412,0.002902654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003342254,0.00017514001,0.00011003971,0.0005206006,0.022312602,0.0037722203,0.002711431,0.003663587,0.00042311833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002600864,0.000026962556,0.0013937112,0.000048545473,0.0000071057434,0.0005369888,0.093038656,0.000091451555,0.00019494971,0.7150854,0.16254228,0.02700798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006368912,0.00002124123,0.0026563748,0.00039457926,0.0000073869824,0.0004482034,0.04977277,0.00016805834,0.0002594658,0.090737596,0.85548806,0.000039943247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08639195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13127862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9136081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057765786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004433193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1717782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399155869","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0123","title":"Private citizen of the world: Karen Knop’s scholarship","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and World Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018976772801084438,"score_gpt":0.2232383596132863,"score_spread":0.20426158681220186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399155869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006089596,0.02273197,0.00075450406,0.7079646,0.0059452727,0.000014620767,0.000059781178,0.000020594021,0.25641906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4271906,0.030016378,0.0009774223,0.16792329,0.0054646973,0.00008101991,0.000071518436,0.00023100595,0.36804396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966145,0.0011249376,0.000108195076,0.0004847834,0.0008287093,0.00083889056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537355,0.0024320446,0.00017839926,0.00032407275,0.0006162131,0.0010758524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033507484,0.00047823958,0.0005788377,0.0015787061,0.021860698,0.016048945,0.0013488348,0.010621544,0.011537466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009420537,0.00045132032,0.00029718425,0.002215464,0.03279334,0.018512748,0.008606482,0.010913491,0.0019137458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074191603,0.000015917578,0.000112662645,0.000029599958,0.0000027856736,0.00014018446,0.013677919,0.00005276919,0.000018837824,0.77394867,0.2074328,0.004560421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004734529,0.000003420974,0.00022679006,0.00019913742,0.0000029700118,0.00011256608,0.01723902,0.000070275106,0.000042992127,0.15245058,0.8296298,0.000017794531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12234484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1715783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87765515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015485193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017811269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24326545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399155886","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0165","title":"Possibility in paradox: Karen Knop re/stated","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.014764602534148893,"score_gpt":0.27822329748327057,"score_spread":0.26345869494912166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399155886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011373234,0.018814275,0.010416972,0.58858824,0.0037080357,0.000027624243,0.00012306402,0.00009377434,0.36685485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7199569,0.009144459,0.004367821,0.09729994,0.0022111451,0.00011683132,0.00007215659,0.0002793482,0.16655137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713886,0.001240014,0.000107810636,0.00056250475,0.0005987775,0.0003520619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980135,0.001182547,0.00012471479,0.00019902301,0.0003663593,0.000113947564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002575858,0.00053178205,0.00041123293,0.00092615536,0.005792275,0.0098894965,0.0014212128,0.008093562,0.009653029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00897789,0.0004123307,0.0005359064,0.0009808354,0.02125012,0.016163524,0.0048638135,0.009682092,0.0021466876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009027833,0.000003555834,0.00006327813,0.000028150313,0.0000029539463,0.00014248215,0.0035733178,0.000107206375,0.00004837837,0.96370304,0.029532451,0.0027862128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100006655,0.0000048839015,0.000104781044,0.0001978689,0.0000077105415,0.00030913608,0.0069788545,0.00032934692,0.00029500882,0.64417523,0.34755185,0.000035267596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015419499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00995417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060094036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051594055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043601453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399155888","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0001","title":"History and contestation: On teaching <i>Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Space (punctuation); Law; International law; Sociology; Conversation; Humility; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013461155105898761,"score_gpt":0.24134894252279387,"score_spread":0.2278877874168951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399155888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10455437,0.053539645,0.009144439,0.30745137,0.0030798134,0.00013245727,0.000031642743,0.00014058928,0.5219257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89477867,0.024046475,0.002470148,0.023917237,0.0011132613,0.00016604585,0.000022911647,0.00018999596,0.053295217],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931825,0.004987412,0.000072337665,0.00036249412,0.00068376877,0.0007115762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929624,0.004896589,0.00038845246,0.00019209628,0.00034713987,0.0012132775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006108779,0.00052770297,0.00057013147,0.0012513978,0.0192073,0.013745779,0.001773677,0.0032284863,0.0045791296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007101073,0.00036951283,0.00026999196,0.0015465071,0.07256693,0.013650099,0.010550175,0.009281841,0.00069033355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009892643,0.00004654889,0.0006961297,0.00011002575,0.0000037528835,0.00022853244,0.5514013,0.00015329005,0.000092712056,0.39647582,0.03305342,0.017728562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009747229,0.000044254703,0.0011014182,0.0007613779,0.0000066369107,0.00023740769,0.4000786,0.00023099488,0.0003023761,0.10307486,0.4941261,0.000026249141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044928133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08939494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95507187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018016724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013551291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13072109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173316","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2023_0163","title":"Private international law’s ambivalent humanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Humanism; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.015077751754143142,"score_gpt":0.2671355663726974,"score_spread":0.25205781461855425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08260108,0.004836615,0.0070545026,0.20098773,0.0005958319,0.000022902374,0.00007988662,0.000049748498,0.70377177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790546,0.0009764068,0.0005449921,0.0080082,0.00020955186,0.000020594734,0.000018222032,0.000020537698,0.011146912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948637,0.0026296403,0.00011105947,0.00065793976,0.0010559321,0.00068170903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670416,0.001794056,0.0002558048,0.00045887707,0.0003739082,0.00041314596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004207421,0.00022488204,0.0002534457,0.0010719943,0.0072246874,0.011839545,0.0007888456,0.0038319428,0.0029468942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006494272,0.00026984964,0.00023686934,0.0008602828,0.06428312,0.008963867,0.0050616404,0.0056098076,0.00034812337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021615908,0.0000033672777,0.00008631892,0.0000052076634,6.8771743e-7,0.000032064774,0.0075108195,0.000038149796,0.00002078267,0.9891099,0.0022940875,0.0008964276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009569294,0.000006791796,0.0005339176,0.00008164193,0.0000026809594,0.00012535315,0.011467137,0.00021857934,0.00010879109,0.8605281,0.12690063,0.000016740265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014254999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010725976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014254999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011367314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004919272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08247596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173337","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0005","title":"The law of international society: A road not taken","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012847067317860355,"score_gpt":0.2566588880102314,"score_spread":0.24381182069237103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173337","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051270183,0.11223258,0.007656879,0.6854153,0.009925496,0.000029929668,0.000076594086,0.00008999102,0.17944618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60820836,0.11271904,0.009986136,0.13674104,0.031149099,0.00022919974,0.00012902517,0.00027895797,0.10055902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954803,0.0021998088,0.00012716354,0.0005794041,0.0011863966,0.00042685968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957338,0.0017644019,0.0002013625,0.00066703255,0.0008615889,0.00077198236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056806123,0.00084725046,0.000890287,0.0022502,0.00855435,0.018814195,0.002156536,0.011861172,0.0054322374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010398771,0.00042476636,0.00060699316,0.0018441087,0.053359356,0.037053064,0.007993173,0.01802107,0.0017530558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035714131,0.0000060547086,0.000037409554,0.00003317155,0.0000017753172,0.000018524088,0.0016014142,0.000032705644,0.000023006423,0.98433685,0.010100508,0.003804967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009875387,0.000023870798,0.00011817031,0.00025362684,0.0000042427196,0.000083570725,0.004081056,0.0001636919,0.000057014964,0.6639099,0.3312835,0.000011436895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018290982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017223896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018814195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009789712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011565958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0710296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173355","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0320","title":"Editor’s introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.010783776986596575,"score_gpt":0.2568700634690322,"score_spread":0.2460862864824356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173355","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040993622,0.0014976993,0.00006708494,0.070074596,0.92329043,0.00003502049,0.00016201174,0.00005823224,0.0047740326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013046652,0.0020893973,0.00023687615,0.16014862,0.7461499,0.00014006329,0.0001614631,0.00010083474,0.08966827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915202,0.0009772959,0.00077895954,0.0011663919,0.0045751873,0.0009819934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688354,0.007857691,0.002551858,0.0017577211,0.0145580815,0.0044393074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007657728,0.0023422253,0.0024101369,0.004751588,0.0047643413,0.008837504,0.004414133,0.02031128,0.106602505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05313885,0.001185919,0.002993583,0.0019318757,0.0025434168,0.0033155347,0.002882495,0.015412753,0.04701329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008246466,0.0000033838685,0.0000146352395,0.0000567016,0.000004048195,0.000034817564,0.000006797689,0.000008233971,0.000014387909,0.000208331,0.9978527,0.0017878434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026915679,0.0000106695725,0.0002602797,0.0002592496,0.000015750782,0.00006817344,0.00004118274,0.000039277882,0.00005833258,0.0005438792,0.9986619,0.000014459259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005403511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015925527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106602505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005022489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007851208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3566209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173373","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0023","title":"Private citizen of the faculty: Some reflections on a colleague, scholar, teacher, and friend","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.03188651589341995,"score_gpt":0.3103022722752983,"score_spread":0.2784157563818783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173373","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09763798,0.0026706182,0.0012083531,0.83160216,0.008173316,0.000106370106,0.00007690108,0.00007304954,0.058451284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59348,0.002122804,0.0006581998,0.31378797,0.0030155035,0.000107740954,0.000036336038,0.00035395543,0.08643744],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97378355,0.013349882,0.00045684638,0.0014527391,0.002881628,0.0080753965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96051526,0.015313948,0.0012511044,0.00095713907,0.00449651,0.017466076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012699418,0.00083879585,0.0010325994,0.0017028885,0.12656032,0.02849359,0.005125151,0.035967197,0.011165726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03601695,0.001368207,0.0015745882,0.0022032557,0.045083452,0.015114905,0.014806169,0.06550777,0.0016603337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043039134,0.0001357041,0.0017371699,0.00006468899,0.000019150737,0.0048661553,0.83134204,0.00006497768,0.00034759898,0.031524673,0.12514618,0.0047085998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074237696,0.000022133225,0.000542753,0.00008262585,0.0000073739684,0.00039203357,0.861707,0.000034370634,0.00011747667,0.001528028,0.13552888,0.000029890443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17206538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3268953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17206538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031740803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022788186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34212768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173382","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0006","title":"‘Private’ diplomacy and nuclear disarmament: Revisiting the Cold War activism of Women for a Meaningful Summit","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disarmament; Summit; Cold war; Diplomacy; Political science; Nuclear weapon; Political economy; International trade; Law; Sociology; Politics; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.012030217743715108,"score_gpt":0.26927338310778554,"score_spread":0.25724316536407044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3200732,0.013614071,0.00991541,0.15483664,0.001839762,0.000099741155,0.000053772204,0.00006401546,0.4995034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97401154,0.0017731164,0.00041950776,0.0060456633,0.0002853481,0.000050164974,0.000011514189,0.000046533536,0.017356595],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185586,0.0052894074,0.000114548384,0.00048485523,0.00056293985,0.0016923675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946239,0.0038578901,0.00050423417,0.0002672857,0.00021663134,0.0005301145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009427464,0.0006276246,0.00052069465,0.001493992,0.027369156,0.015591688,0.001350675,0.0048764427,0.0042473692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076465756,0.0005062724,0.0003189119,0.0013283222,0.07643195,0.010781048,0.014509578,0.007066669,0.00044631114],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001729022,0.000017674436,0.0005951051,0.00006425946,0.000004124756,0.00028431587,0.55266273,0.000083813895,0.00025441544,0.43343636,0.0040978733,0.008482015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009526508,0.000051692252,0.0016099763,0.00042963607,0.000006794491,0.00019829912,0.5248968,0.0001626483,0.00068098726,0.05822946,0.41369805,0.000026062446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027886642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050039195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027886642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014699074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00917644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10664976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173393","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0007","title":"My own pink world: Feminist diplomacy after culture","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01261164017243876,"score_gpt":0.2673832752390351,"score_spread":0.25477163506659634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22079553,0.008122477,0.0073418925,0.27755144,0.0018973367,0.000040229486,0.00007683143,0.00007188176,0.48410243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97676545,0.0007635073,0.00049769104,0.0066995164,0.00011764601,0.000016792052,0.000009187081,0.000043676147,0.015086626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948226,0.00329406,0.000060121107,0.0003187308,0.0005337041,0.0009708219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964502,0.0017813705,0.0003212233,0.0004194195,0.00037167635,0.00065608905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072128098,0.00033571591,0.00031396648,0.0008963721,0.014939196,0.015557976,0.00079114054,0.0025223852,0.005529186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007986892,0.00026821933,0.00025808564,0.0009189122,0.053860776,0.010625377,0.0086439205,0.0072102346,0.00042563013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020881176,0.000012432434,0.000730362,0.000021906713,0.0000031595116,0.00015315134,0.20347962,0.000054004184,0.00016250642,0.7786021,0.008270722,0.008489085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002009024,0.000044926786,0.002603298,0.00043830663,0.000009705134,0.0002844561,0.42681307,0.00039560787,0.001021002,0.2009222,0.36740303,0.000044310305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045620613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045876157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045620613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0154914195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006165625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112398624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173395","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0142","title":"The right to have private rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.00813369998721891,"score_gpt":0.2493610512684378,"score_spread":0.2412273512812189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016168222,0.0037730276,0.013841403,0.12285217,0.0008139836,0.000050117185,0.00019161013,0.00007458991,0.84223497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79535073,0.0027008825,0.005029043,0.031510353,0.00089830224,0.00014051422,0.00016126792,0.000091128015,0.16411784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99099684,0.0031155865,0.000359639,0.0016586008,0.0022847627,0.0015845872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99390197,0.0026613579,0.0003559231,0.0014311401,0.0010382168,0.0006113332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074007683,0.00038081003,0.0005407136,0.0006115521,0.006938286,0.007408948,0.0008455491,0.0069871014,0.010148904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011193484,0.00045542637,0.00043203533,0.00050751417,0.03951064,0.009748838,0.0060173925,0.00686793,0.0019939477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003176874,0.0000035834253,0.00008157417,0.0000068054865,0.0000015678896,0.000024603838,0.001567052,0.00002091022,0.00006619675,0.9892964,0.006542679,0.0023854547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016582764,0.000022128146,0.00057734956,0.0001620489,0.000008265814,0.00024327514,0.0015959563,0.00015319644,0.00032843067,0.5489869,0.44787332,0.00003252434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018237142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015357098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018237142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043016667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059492844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03913945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173893","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0010","title":"Trade law as foreign relations law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011346325241881354,"score_gpt":0.20157671482210202,"score_spread":0.19023038958022065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003999498,0.010648153,0.004152374,0.043666236,0.0011038566,0.000012998103,0.0000495122,0.000057356447,0.93631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6918202,0.013255578,0.0029384426,0.025695741,0.0036204522,0.00008622502,0.00012045091,0.00012989675,0.26233307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758434,0.000909418,0.000083634746,0.00029966637,0.0006271469,0.00049579004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985317,0.0005876475,0.00014301884,0.0002597444,0.00029992493,0.00017798235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002373403,0.00033054705,0.00035664323,0.0012096369,0.004952592,0.014968353,0.00077309273,0.005844292,0.009198438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036311408,0.00021687464,0.00030213545,0.0017520247,0.024545265,0.0075325654,0.0027077869,0.0055713276,0.0016124847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.925872e-7,9.767382e-7,0.000018644647,0.0000031917402,2.1844602e-7,0.000013952587,0.00040141167,0.000033272274,0.000008333004,0.9957151,0.0026773338,0.0011268439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004382463,0.0000071310587,0.0001609034,0.00011517993,0.0000023388855,0.00006693113,0.0012209959,0.00027233412,0.00005580866,0.5150066,0.48308167,0.00000572385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042086862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027811445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042086862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011445769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008708903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08368379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173933","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0143","title":"Rehoming diplomacy: Privilege and possibility in the international law of diplomatic relations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Diplomacy; Privilege (computing); Political science; Law; International law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.010841228235912081,"score_gpt":0.21498657315728417,"score_spread":0.2041453449213721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13757858,0.013645198,0.043183394,0.040809985,0.0008651362,0.00007210668,0.000054519787,0.00006014853,0.76373106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98853475,0.0009762299,0.001355792,0.0015389312,0.00022357101,0.00006228084,0.000008739405,0.000021822678,0.007277977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99124265,0.005300067,0.0002956691,0.00086670404,0.00092154817,0.0013734171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645185,0.0024528867,0.00027589896,0.00041839448,0.00019070982,0.00021024467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008872282,0.00044206379,0.000465361,0.0017981123,0.012297154,0.0137201315,0.0011291977,0.004655139,0.0030808435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010587203,0.0004952302,0.0005403169,0.0013977601,0.08615882,0.014481065,0.012859637,0.007548527,0.00029615298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037506886,0.0000016081865,0.00008372901,0.0000048698125,6.4334733e-7,0.000028225777,0.006336324,0.000026974098,0.000022498167,0.99242353,0.00018056188,0.0008871583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023975748,0.00003405841,0.0008790346,0.0002948883,0.000009085443,0.00017692347,0.01518427,0.00033878183,0.0002033997,0.89126277,0.09156386,0.000028928715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009818747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070573306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137201315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070963986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044076894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05148816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085657","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0151","title":"Why we should think about democratic frontsliding as well as democratic backsliding","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024495461010879946,"score_gpt":0.2640620831361423,"score_spread":0.23956662212526236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085657","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073465374,0.0147109255,0.008634505,0.855274,0.0045728413,0.00003881642,0.00006518847,0.00009889874,0.10925819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65908694,0.0106630465,0.0069614076,0.26936054,0.005650505,0.00017182594,0.000087526154,0.00037776248,0.047640525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882438,0.005214807,0.00031904242,0.0016965227,0.0020128384,0.0025128946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864304,0.0059774527,0.0012464563,0.0014126019,0.0024855242,0.0024475192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010636005,0.00046067438,0.0006842489,0.0011161695,0.0101651475,0.0135086365,0.0018642056,0.011074484,0.008841478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022104573,0.00040291285,0.0006129935,0.0011644053,0.057011932,0.025631921,0.004234078,0.019294087,0.002442944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114386485,0.000013942896,0.00054604193,0.00008430877,0.000008638439,0.00006239822,0.004350074,0.0001709091,0.000064579355,0.936378,0.052133087,0.0061765206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020760657,0.000012363718,0.0007953585,0.00026394994,0.000007876708,0.00010019585,0.005587016,0.00022656684,0.00017839558,0.7613644,0.23141545,0.000027619079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015383048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018834358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015383048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010437027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078666145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07572627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085671","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0021","title":"Unjust enrichment in law and equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Equity (law); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Restitution","score_opus":0.021927008087945787,"score_gpt":0.3043307091853372,"score_spread":0.28240370109739144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06380742,0.012495965,0.024000261,0.095535256,0.00057266344,0.0000904482,0.00006112781,0.00007301856,0.8033637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602719,0.0016451533,0.0015557619,0.015440098,0.00049686217,0.000097713855,0.000023033952,0.000024687088,0.020444874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99290293,0.003269793,0.0002372763,0.00087570935,0.0012920047,0.0014221529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972391,0.001631836,0.00027559555,0.00029072154,0.00029482332,0.00026792154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006659916,0.00036360446,0.00046877962,0.0011638203,0.006832272,0.0079579055,0.0011353537,0.0058446247,0.0036817745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008210365,0.0003501689,0.00040404004,0.0007858872,0.049865622,0.009749552,0.006774293,0.006231625,0.00033569318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020555376,0.000003013379,0.0000786921,0.0000039894862,6.7378085e-7,0.000018410168,0.00041883573,0.00004800805,0.000016281507,0.9979304,0.0005857115,0.00089386303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009290965,0.000011822566,0.00030952212,0.000075431526,0.00000292518,0.00003919484,0.0005584692,0.00023683185,0.00013438279,0.96427643,0.03433731,0.000008295313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133343795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010550006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0133343795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007925042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065388405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05750054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085703","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0074","title":"Family lawyers on cohabitation and judge-made law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Law; Political science; Family law; Sociology","score_opus":0.013498242166093787,"score_gpt":0.25600637802477283,"score_spread":0.24250813585867903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18884562,0.010688272,0.008060885,0.26851958,0.0011233962,0.00010504296,0.00006413375,0.000052886706,0.5225402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511358,0.0016800058,0.0006678441,0.023430066,0.00037836752,0.000026186955,0.000010786575,0.000016284368,0.022654647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881443,0.004491446,0.00031526302,0.0010109176,0.0025809698,0.0034570675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98199147,0.011353642,0.001279738,0.0008105339,0.0027209166,0.0018437544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016124118,0.00019764299,0.00040098478,0.0009873769,0.022601776,0.006168781,0.0017654216,0.0063456977,0.006471619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030207805,0.00033314887,0.00022822448,0.000776519,0.03866308,0.0044375765,0.0060087168,0.008555009,0.0003234507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020590565,0.000038571136,0.00443837,0.000031655276,0.0000051141137,0.00064032804,0.050865714,0.00012265553,0.00021435799,0.9117439,0.0123387985,0.019540003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067083776,0.00014217451,0.017370403,0.0008062993,0.000057627618,0.0005788161,0.08329585,0.0007335171,0.001482042,0.33688527,0.5584641,0.000116855124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38109186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51115465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38109186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018381473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03176819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7577473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085720","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0045","title":"Judicial review as a quasi-administrative jurisdiction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Administrative law; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.06516211597671469,"score_gpt":0.377156321890533,"score_spread":0.3119942059138183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033234756,0.012183677,0.32037234,0.08293337,0.0026452735,0.0009770818,0.00019087426,0.0005277193,0.54693496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8647897,0.004718116,0.048283566,0.016408702,0.003893851,0.0010305396,0.00009467632,0.0001558145,0.060624983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8953787,0.056783516,0.0050318716,0.013434585,0.024545087,0.004826079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92779106,0.04223443,0.005673249,0.012283171,0.010211974,0.0018060748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053786356,0.00042429328,0.0009334917,0.0023211,0.00550532,0.016501805,0.003292831,0.007790979,0.004432279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06391766,0.0008603942,0.00090265943,0.0018444072,0.026258653,0.009752337,0.006808144,0.007054821,0.0015485036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006181805,0.00001006681,0.00019479758,0.00003137443,0.000008109324,0.000046685924,0.0009300459,0.00023158987,0.00016194492,0.98933804,0.0019447287,0.0070965136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008028258,0.0001411968,0.0010207293,0.00042031164,0.00005377621,0.00041683178,0.0007464161,0.0028489234,0.0008006296,0.68878967,0.30455306,0.00012823347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049615363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005638571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053786356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006807235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01863523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2844528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523653","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0004","title":"When judges are not judging","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.024763917333902312,"score_gpt":0.3087551784044162,"score_spread":0.28399126107051387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10520033,0.0055194665,0.017570198,0.17363109,0.010794647,0.00019452447,0.0001369161,0.0003324646,0.6866203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90549463,0.0012795526,0.004734492,0.041723173,0.0014516484,0.00013834833,0.000109870576,0.00031131523,0.044756994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91214925,0.03218116,0.004233965,0.011609252,0.029566193,0.01026022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91177636,0.02902041,0.007876932,0.00782203,0.034808937,0.008695372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033972897,0.0003679661,0.0010464041,0.0014127292,0.013341923,0.01741304,0.0026484935,0.009056373,0.006339414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17495866,0.0008022586,0.00045943816,0.0018374431,0.02554714,0.009604207,0.0068611843,0.0124238795,0.0028157025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013400086,0.000055667035,0.014903273,0.00040978653,0.00008604342,0.0020371713,0.12950176,0.0002581075,0.0018927803,0.5646107,0.20561364,0.08049699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053958138,0.00007675283,0.0072501986,0.00090507086,0.00009128447,0.0010824199,0.08088155,0.00053848926,0.0019048039,0.21456519,0.69247174,0.00017857025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022459708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046885032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033972897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066400245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016652456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17966801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523696","doi":"10.3138/ultj-2024-1031","title":"Editor’s note","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.004239539415224225,"score_gpt":0.21665188450017447,"score_spread":0.21241234508495024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523696","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048077296,0.0023095047,0.00021303074,0.57643545,0.38607368,0.00016574484,0.0004684523,0.00022808691,0.033625342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038858275,0.0012895943,0.00040357513,0.68608534,0.11211188,0.0002859891,0.00010344157,0.00013564216,0.1956987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887388,0.00078834937,0.000917818,0.002263216,0.0052267946,0.002065055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97799385,0.006809159,0.0012178114,0.0012050115,0.009791126,0.002983028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065990714,0.0021715632,0.00384533,0.0033529594,0.015196768,0.014832932,0.007065133,0.06312167,0.06141464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05526027,0.0021390577,0.0032178727,0.0030930496,0.004321488,0.005304707,0.004062263,0.045043,0.034836233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008557609,0.0000056083168,0.000045252917,0.000021990243,0.0000059234894,0.00009735232,0.000046763904,0.000014599541,0.000023872279,0.00081561046,0.997869,0.00104558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030402725,0.000011996717,0.0006020148,0.0001839046,0.000035714653,0.000087618195,0.00029873362,0.0001340761,0.00015923662,0.0010007815,0.9974093,0.000046399888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08919828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24308358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08919828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01381944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025829377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20545244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523726","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0002","title":"LexOptima: The promise of AI-enabled legal systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.015636912651205172,"score_gpt":0.283403782770766,"score_spread":0.26776687011956085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523726","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020980988,0.0040838164,0.64117146,0.14548467,0.001011391,0.00039312817,0.0009176384,0.0051179216,0.18083896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4713066,0.005054185,0.4868315,0.006732605,0.0008100264,0.0005003571,0.0011615858,0.0010588501,0.0265443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942211,0.0028128705,0.0002602573,0.0006654167,0.0016700503,0.0003703644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869501,0.005727129,0.00077990483,0.004038331,0.0012082087,0.00129633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092667565,0.00055678043,0.0005604615,0.0016973296,0.003596814,0.011607265,0.0028592478,0.0032033785,0.011500861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020578472,0.000508126,0.0007823723,0.0017275795,0.0105829695,0.015665274,0.009689195,0.004661236,0.002562317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040577343,0.0000436567,0.00061400316,0.00011804623,0.000020302465,0.0000878536,0.0006679338,0.01418283,0.00057763606,0.9064162,0.017526932,0.059704043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020887848,0.000026841437,0.00026186657,0.00011569294,0.000009328128,0.00006314494,0.00036561856,0.04247872,0.0006207944,0.8031491,0.15285861,0.000029311683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011307824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010885927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011607265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057467604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010143517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049007833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523980","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0033","title":"Marx, justice, and the juridical","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.006863217310059625,"score_gpt":0.23932067711405802,"score_spread":0.2324574598039984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017065793,0.042458534,0.008324743,0.15667318,0.0015483953,0.00003986098,0.00008067012,0.000059900598,0.773749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90528274,0.009635677,0.0029326905,0.009777668,0.0012190578,0.00008352995,0.000037965823,0.000062541956,0.07096817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493426,0.002788929,0.00015300786,0.0003779563,0.001106153,0.0006398105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975683,0.0015073778,0.00023392882,0.00023390696,0.00023846806,0.00021800114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004570422,0.00041189734,0.00043976223,0.0014929624,0.008454065,0.01049584,0.0008914817,0.004428811,0.0023376555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006273674,0.00032995606,0.00025206414,0.0017479664,0.054999538,0.006472005,0.0040043765,0.0052127964,0.00050958304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034033487,0.0000025429374,0.000025221772,0.000008070578,6.2499834e-7,0.000010912611,0.001307175,0.000041602558,0.000009781506,0.994173,0.0034160193,0.0010017194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008228862,0.0000043646965,0.000116742696,0.00005929065,0.0000015450856,0.00002662429,0.0017578098,0.00008573339,0.00006273722,0.89723843,0.10063054,0.000007878062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0110206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013106122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015568841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015568841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01072804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11296034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406525303","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0133","title":"Myths and misconceptions in extraterritorial torts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.007991150208491234,"score_gpt":0.26759540826327044,"score_spread":0.2596042580547792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406525303","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02838126,0.01848068,0.010979259,0.89194727,0.0040716003,0.000034458037,0.00008097204,0.00008700156,0.04593746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82397765,0.014887899,0.006596643,0.1411354,0.007847208,0.00017183306,0.000053518026,0.00011482049,0.0052151456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735554,0.01593993,0.0012657709,0.0031491672,0.00485364,0.0012362149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9022325,0.08276441,0.0043629277,0.0035195674,0.0055914456,0.0015290543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051205833,0.0006916997,0.0009132818,0.005089218,0.0094376,0.012073949,0.0063614394,0.014940269,0.0023094302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0637382,0.0008305902,0.000998498,0.0028418084,0.14309488,0.026062539,0.006804041,0.026974902,0.00063598115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027147542,0.000027131287,0.0006308743,0.00013145992,0.000016115648,0.00020246494,0.04809448,0.00034816258,0.000086290675,0.92248905,0.018190658,0.009756237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026328931,0.000034961893,0.00065734,0.00097589823,0.000017358601,0.00045289917,0.022166165,0.0011027703,0.0004374346,0.8570663,0.11699164,0.00007093824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004226092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002538194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008474322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037838072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27080554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406525310","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0039","title":"Chekhov’s gun is being fired","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gun control; Political science; Forensic engineering; Computer security; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.004160155815388647,"score_gpt":0.1946226107348326,"score_spread":0.19046245491944397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406525310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009750009,0.019724688,0.0029650752,0.09073079,0.0048932843,0.000020843236,0.00024920085,0.00010115004,0.87156487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5112339,0.010231175,0.0015888615,0.06873319,0.0014050099,0.000046365258,0.00028188288,0.00026465044,0.40621495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982418,0.00026306586,0.000039285365,0.00029097666,0.0007114893,0.00045338258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993285,0.00018558836,0.000032282514,0.0000906284,0.00026414377,0.00009887997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014321137,0.00021210083,0.00051249744,0.00052082696,0.008712389,0.004203058,0.00082343904,0.0030106255,0.01030563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044076582,0.00016998242,0.00031213873,0.00074555667,0.008462471,0.002380495,0.0019423864,0.006446893,0.00187122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001101419,0.000002208774,0.00018242447,0.000021983835,0.0000039119795,0.000034619054,0.0006561856,0.000052073636,0.00004566021,0.9135585,0.07624503,0.009186475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066137145,0.0000073673036,0.00082272524,0.00016787843,0.000006085528,0.00009021287,0.0010920335,0.000107063024,0.00020767143,0.13160937,0.86586535,0.000017559154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27672735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37021935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7232727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010196976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014162422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55023324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408226521","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0025","title":"The laws of the unreasonable victim: Care, mitigation, and strategic deferral","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deferral; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.012034341763393042,"score_gpt":0.18091752038818254,"score_spread":0.1688831786247895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408226521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16684808,0.013424232,0.1534984,0.15551823,0.0008982248,0.00015659395,0.00009305594,0.00007025283,0.5094929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98094994,0.0011457391,0.004463596,0.004789653,0.00024160778,0.00006273493,0.00001006506,0.00001189099,0.008324768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451184,0.002184892,0.00020057564,0.00064584607,0.0015505302,0.00090622454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504757,0.0026863487,0.00083027245,0.00059374765,0.0004818423,0.00036029276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005822272,0.00040481074,0.0005381597,0.0007190035,0.0030351502,0.0049069165,0.0015162252,0.007342646,0.0023948115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011413136,0.00034115303,0.0006508935,0.0005217447,0.0316994,0.0062899794,0.0049431752,0.0053144004,0.00022535509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002454359,0.0000031029379,0.00014887136,0.000005482835,0.0000014655033,0.000028768414,0.00035932512,0.00016099334,0.000028179393,0.9979704,0.00026100196,0.0010300116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011108801,0.000023923629,0.000683756,0.00007354365,0.000011347288,0.00013291874,0.0004920281,0.00093973515,0.0001893151,0.98368764,0.01374038,0.00001432414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014829649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01383204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014829649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005722604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007089665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041520536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408226825","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0008","title":"Deference as informed respect: <i>Vavilov’s</i> implications for procedural review of legislative functions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Cégep de Jonquière","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislature; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02745905059110631,"score_gpt":0.3123904438579811,"score_spread":0.2849313932668748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408226825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03986089,0.025344558,0.12575808,0.2801006,0.002262395,0.00018649537,0.00015917313,0.0002061626,0.52612174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92458767,0.0027938224,0.015452197,0.031595554,0.00085446617,0.00011000626,0.000032095144,0.000071905655,0.024502339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97815794,0.0084036235,0.0010879018,0.0031061475,0.0065249396,0.0027194275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98242503,0.009884291,0.0013179255,0.0019811234,0.003338254,0.0010535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022291683,0.00037154407,0.00063099473,0.0019108341,0.007336868,0.011933506,0.0025260455,0.007942625,0.0021070794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036217343,0.00042044974,0.001138604,0.0012439993,0.045373704,0.0083009,0.005885595,0.008533463,0.00037990173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029945577,0.0000019037544,0.00006394323,0.00001007822,0.0000018868328,0.000018256036,0.00088190346,0.00007695715,0.0000394722,0.99650025,0.0009306135,0.0014716513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015779686,0.00002156488,0.0005058209,0.00016456317,0.000017585187,0.00008498482,0.0007226903,0.00055484375,0.00030274005,0.8917238,0.10584991,0.000035751716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14033158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11902717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14033158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025372908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03547918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2790295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408511282","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0053","title":"Contracting Without Promising","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.010012354597544345,"score_gpt":0.2176820259032647,"score_spread":0.20766967130572034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408511282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006993007,0.00134314,0.047025606,0.025386838,0.0005994944,0.00013647943,0.00034592298,0.00020429338,0.9179652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65788776,0.0027725976,0.03789957,0.01814886,0.0009790953,0.0006273349,0.00065748027,0.0006026707,0.28042465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174994,0.0027420889,0.00051448605,0.0021141644,0.0016518353,0.0012273688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925176,0.002577567,0.0005204964,0.002152019,0.00156586,0.0006665064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007935486,0.00077184464,0.0009062277,0.0011814788,0.0076443474,0.0073945187,0.0016816973,0.006676289,0.044765588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016922923,0.00082414754,0.0015665254,0.0011533315,0.016280875,0.014388989,0.007120427,0.0076040737,0.008402749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048190905,0.0000033217318,0.000045759465,0.000012164675,0.0000018197944,0.000034217683,0.00016859248,0.000040247367,0.00003886894,0.99612457,0.002057223,0.0014683716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013898317,0.00001752688,0.00013487595,0.000081985956,0.000009085561,0.0002477573,0.00036051913,0.00046780042,0.00018889068,0.88291425,0.11554775,0.000015676764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045025754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005137997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044765588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051660007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007895293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14975584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411054569","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0077","title":"Constitutional silence, section 36, and public services on Indian reserves","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Business; Art; Advertising; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.013415727894647027,"score_gpt":0.18240255632641983,"score_spread":0.1689868284317728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411054569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10291836,0.0054388214,0.008198904,0.22471574,0.0014300075,0.00011233708,0.0011141552,0.00022057779,0.65585107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89011675,0.0016088927,0.0026257704,0.047163613,0.00042446057,0.000083388324,0.00026660072,0.000095104755,0.05761548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841941,0.0020221183,0.00062477967,0.0016619492,0.0065419455,0.00495519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904987,0.0034799362,0.0005412621,0.00093319325,0.003353961,0.0011928725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009312124,0.00038789486,0.00054360175,0.0015752555,0.01576594,0.009709168,0.0026644368,0.0062268167,0.006021438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018244106,0.0005009422,0.00064031547,0.002217934,0.030090664,0.0036052573,0.00449486,0.011473734,0.00050096796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008317817,0.000004383257,0.00032353448,0.000014548579,0.0000032979133,0.000065239525,0.0025841903,0.000131839,0.00013602585,0.9848369,0.0089547,0.0029370782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054289543,0.00004924721,0.01212674,0.0006413633,0.00007188233,0.0002469053,0.012664409,0.0010580806,0.0012607593,0.32151482,0.6500299,0.00028160037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9277356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9208619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11218141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46723515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411055867","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0081","title":"Ethics for traveling judges","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0661092475760345,"score_gpt":0.3611830205292944,"score_spread":0.2950737729532599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411055867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07123618,0.005871321,0.04101031,0.22444259,0.0018979962,0.00020622103,0.00006792229,0.000071143266,0.65519637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8878844,0.0014947468,0.009644775,0.025985532,0.0006483697,0.00019378217,0.000039935323,0.00007826029,0.074030235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97700423,0.01514333,0.0008280311,0.0018807128,0.002343457,0.0028001517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879666,0.0050906427,0.00092366396,0.0013038919,0.002494878,0.0022203384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01376272,0.00027879942,0.00029013262,0.00059047376,0.016624229,0.008119938,0.0012042738,0.00867788,0.0043363953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021373102,0.00036806468,0.00040983208,0.0005456078,0.032277554,0.0046636327,0.0042608944,0.00788902,0.0011251973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049540613,0.0000061304845,0.00062627083,0.000016367334,0.0000029917057,0.00017069768,0.017853104,0.000101807476,0.0001083584,0.96686125,0.010787704,0.0034604373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022699673,0.00003652279,0.0016803704,0.00025989948,0.000013957867,0.0005945086,0.03247054,0.0006985127,0.0003011217,0.55621827,0.40765983,0.0000437753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020238474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027102973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020238474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056778304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113607505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07278514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412797751","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0109","title":"Virtuous or vicious circle? Legitimacy and effectiveness in WTO dispute settlement thirty years on","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Legitimacy; Political science; Settlement (finance); Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.006175919507822212,"score_gpt":0.2517982292743991,"score_spread":0.2456223097665769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412797751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54786605,0.0063006026,0.014679586,0.04403835,0.00040851487,0.00015533314,0.000057465706,0.000051151528,0.38644296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969688,0.00043273068,0.00046079932,0.00031608116,0.00009147145,0.000017048626,0.000008111046,0.000014249863,0.0016907516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97963274,0.010107101,0.0010610243,0.0014361533,0.005548753,0.0022141365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9211764,0.051428918,0.013073153,0.0029052394,0.0070178537,0.0043985685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03171035,0.00028681415,0.00064230035,0.00459154,0.004007597,0.01681174,0.0013011899,0.0030288124,0.0068487287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10229091,0.00024712045,0.000430054,0.0028516909,0.03175882,0.016534116,0.008056529,0.0044360203,0.00056852493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010890077,0.00018022035,0.03136487,0.000106549676,0.000053260435,0.000306944,0.024420409,0.001588754,0.00022993208,0.89392114,0.0024681948,0.04525096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010088094,0.00030478547,0.08881281,0.00094397925,0.00006717236,0.00039086794,0.046789628,0.0067311614,0.0012673606,0.8028601,0.051597416,0.00013383021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036602223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030456115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03171035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007174885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00419788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16770232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412797945","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0012","title":"On disciplining states","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005491298718677091,"score_gpt":0.22526738476711883,"score_spread":0.21977608604844173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412797945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008841333,0.002717625,0.0015377243,0.023284493,0.0003321659,0.000019384774,0.000093575334,0.00001531229,0.9631584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73292047,0.0025843233,0.00051340926,0.010407768,0.0005017752,0.0000635271,0.00006772072,0.000058860303,0.2528822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789065,0.000625218,0.0000528264,0.00033615332,0.0004378608,0.0006572869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977412,0.0009928608,0.0001361684,0.0003550744,0.00047911165,0.00029552958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023676394,0.00040469997,0.00043719375,0.0012053284,0.013602244,0.010524283,0.0011561464,0.006117247,0.025400897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006746639,0.00036321022,0.00034729086,0.0015742367,0.027547412,0.005728769,0.0038764605,0.006249267,0.001391362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017362323,0.0000013539675,0.000053409356,0.0000036498495,5.849792e-7,0.000010164621,0.001084719,0.00001846956,0.000005869432,0.99194443,0.0061712964,0.00070442056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011485408,0.0000068261916,0.0008259075,0.00012916194,0.000009059541,0.00002785106,0.006200976,0.00015555111,0.00010462655,0.7404504,0.2520655,0.000012700947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30494264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45168212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30494264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017282771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012410389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60633534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102522511","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0055","title":"Seventy-five years of legal education and scholarship at the ‘modern’ Faculty of Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal research; Higher education; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.023926528288515745,"score_gpt":0.3374437462230814,"score_spread":0.3135172179345656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102522511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014996242,0.33688837,0.0018886612,0.3919605,0.053952392,0.000056868605,0.00037044229,0.0001706779,0.19971582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24154489,0.23264538,0.0032663622,0.050565254,0.027698133,0.00011504219,0.00045615272,0.00032098603,0.4433877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392515,0.0011123313,0.00022801083,0.00032312007,0.0032765605,0.0011348333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908049,0.001459753,0.0005101036,0.00033908908,0.0023487946,0.0045373295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004741508,0.0004896258,0.00046067088,0.0024906383,0.0093535,0.009231124,0.0010817895,0.0035605493,0.017841442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085797245,0.00043572675,0.00031241143,0.003880093,0.016433233,0.0051395064,0.004641703,0.004715222,0.0031433217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018978357,0.000037196605,0.0010336803,0.0005261006,0.0000065991003,0.00019330565,0.04030898,0.00007929201,0.00032686803,0.2530875,0.62261844,0.0817631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013007278,0.0000064831606,0.0012824875,0.00029106997,0.0000011836306,0.000034136938,0.003386957,0.000008884489,0.000032444255,0.0018518032,0.9930956,0.000007715842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1688646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43004158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96007127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03992874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04445863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3357634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102574942","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0036","title":"Trebilcock and trade-offs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technocracy; Normative; Scholarship; Variety (cybernetics); Theme (computing); Politics; Relation (database); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.009671858974177336,"score_gpt":0.24612016569689543,"score_spread":0.2364483067227181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102574942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007314374,0.022723902,0.026924,0.08374028,0.0010859774,0.00006607173,0.00006349204,0.00007425003,0.8580076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77825314,0.013775598,0.012473631,0.050677292,0.0033807654,0.000498371,0.000084208456,0.00036040696,0.14049661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98094845,0.009410545,0.000623267,0.003513988,0.0035702786,0.0019335239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98796964,0.008632461,0.00056586444,0.001211254,0.001192432,0.00042833292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0147004295,0.0011142546,0.0011181707,0.003633971,0.01015977,0.012778422,0.002692372,0.015126273,0.01649375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025947997,0.0006633388,0.0014811968,0.0036214634,0.055420555,0.016211296,0.0078053093,0.014238472,0.0022886426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026015502,0.0000041467483,0.000025086709,0.0000067195947,0.0000017860611,0.000020507006,0.00026734488,0.00007681768,0.0000057778607,0.9964498,0.0019735238,0.0011657528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000474356,0.0000052104224,0.000039483795,0.000071658105,0.0000023865905,0.00004209904,0.00016774556,0.00018575642,0.000040844003,0.95591325,0.043518025,0.000008813689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009848358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006840259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017738666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017738666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00508979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12870365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102610877","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0034","title":"Gender equality, AI, and the future of human rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Principal (computer security); Order (exchange); Gender equality","score_opus":0.023860933616311364,"score_gpt":0.3286279204972078,"score_spread":0.30476698688089643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102610877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020594973,0.042731963,0.009950527,0.42445856,0.0015449269,0.000023465736,0.000044140943,0.00003036359,0.5006211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90837187,0.02006572,0.0035279938,0.03387592,0.0018710698,0.00006346344,0.000026493573,0.000035566918,0.03216195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99171525,0.0048342547,0.00012553297,0.0006353316,0.001471552,0.0012180617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919966,0.0052296803,0.00044013382,0.00059310073,0.00082540564,0.0009150285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012440686,0.00036851532,0.00051851966,0.0012690732,0.009368242,0.010948129,0.0009859552,0.005920219,0.005152515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008770333,0.00020974026,0.00033264488,0.0010590027,0.09455832,0.009891766,0.0053042546,0.006769026,0.00047411886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027571346,0.000002621414,0.000095503914,0.000011051353,0.0000010176843,0.00002247407,0.002918655,0.000045272314,0.00002504898,0.9913521,0.001664107,0.0038595204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049822256,0.000010808014,0.0005596237,0.00017446061,0.0000026572782,0.00006168663,0.0050399723,0.00012054078,0.000090694404,0.83125776,0.16266398,0.000012826796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048317704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05749115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048317704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014502625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012471892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10522437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102648418","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0039","title":"Denise Réaume and the Women’s Court of Canada: Feminist judgment projects and rewriting <i>Pierson v Post</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Scholarship; Supreme court; Rewriting; Legal history; Conciliation; Perspective (graphical); Common law; Legal formalism","score_opus":0.0049925668961238135,"score_gpt":0.2008647706149532,"score_spread":0.19587220371882938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102648418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0998428,0.017554259,0.0032106156,0.17849922,0.002148977,0.00007801557,0.00018026555,0.00008099851,0.6984048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88196194,0.00432577,0.001154637,0.018184025,0.00041336106,0.00006154796,0.00005401967,0.00013826464,0.09370639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992912,0.0018570648,0.00010794732,0.0007391022,0.002385485,0.0019983833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953257,0.002525999,0.00021990885,0.00022692,0.0011459552,0.00055562885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046190443,0.00052311557,0.00042783207,0.0015093955,0.040254958,0.018019829,0.002547096,0.0065681473,0.0036449875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009881544,0.00053605053,0.00033129443,0.0023045342,0.058637712,0.0048608165,0.00492022,0.011662637,0.00028719177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001207817,0.00001071251,0.00046873925,0.00003793599,0.0000058318437,0.0005248845,0.18526363,0.00019863698,0.00021680277,0.7555664,0.04799217,0.009702236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012476122,0.000014867324,0.002171024,0.00034539818,0.000019171885,0.00023824429,0.14571947,0.0003724872,0.0008178359,0.05417501,0.7960165,0.00009749239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9412241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96908903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14074495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14074495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09378149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99661404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102652650","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0041","title":"Richard Charles Bosworth (Dick) Risk: Maker of Canadian legal history","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Compensation (psychology); Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.007257814264269505,"score_gpt":0.1821882469109997,"score_spread":0.1749304326467302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102652650","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010345861,0.1144311,0.0018881641,0.6526644,0.009373425,0.00004894957,0.00051350787,0.0001190476,0.21061556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3668484,0.10270554,0.0054864497,0.08497839,0.0039748424,0.00006432073,0.00033576312,0.00040204177,0.4352043],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965012,0.00046354707,0.00007125679,0.0003972572,0.0018944012,0.0006723397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944659,0.0010610755,0.00018306763,0.00013986601,0.0029528085,0.0011972591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027783199,0.0005511165,0.0005160275,0.004263189,0.025706703,0.011590635,0.0014662726,0.0030414995,0.011367024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009895606,0.00046553358,0.00027931825,0.0049363105,0.016299954,0.0048731784,0.002379621,0.004742881,0.0011266313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017898547,0.000008746162,0.0012528182,0.0000839628,0.000006737338,0.00021779205,0.011651969,0.000122045676,0.0001293231,0.26598224,0.6917773,0.028749144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027176336,0.0000013233112,0.0011577116,0.00012602835,0.0000033729762,0.00006257154,0.005265109,0.00006764023,0.00006489221,0.012061176,0.9811608,0.000026675783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97353506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98416394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1204087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1204087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09534011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87363034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102654051","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0033","title":"The law’s own terms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Perspective (graphical); Liability; Framing (construction); Property (philosophy); Economic Justice; Relation (database)","score_opus":0.008273622615102337,"score_gpt":0.25890349847135896,"score_spread":0.2506298758562566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102654051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004314159,0.0065055927,0.017824544,0.13162886,0.0026481769,0.000044895543,0.00016334062,0.00008920978,0.83678114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63391805,0.0055956217,0.01229422,0.04784246,0.006863965,0.0003407081,0.0002718427,0.0003467692,0.2925264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932957,0.0020302255,0.00027610152,0.0010302574,0.0025582223,0.000809345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582183,0.0015555137,0.00022245152,0.000978657,0.0009948397,0.00042671058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005862656,0.00052607,0.0006812139,0.0013253038,0.0068011484,0.011745569,0.0018081401,0.007573051,0.010813434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012617023,0.0004595034,0.0004900087,0.0010693601,0.029919157,0.010059323,0.004898098,0.012278878,0.002536941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.864475e-7,0.0000019183433,0.000017572667,0.0000029780076,5.4277217e-7,0.0000057269945,0.0004940252,0.000015242708,0.000012612667,0.99356306,0.0049447906,0.00094085105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044437274,0.000007241934,0.00011205146,0.00007515773,0.000002893826,0.000048896978,0.0009080038,0.00017741961,0.00007266594,0.62425965,0.37432295,0.000008726546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014012029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012071685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014012029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008208917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008457715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05956012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102689192","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0043","title":"A pragmatist approach to the administrative state: A new interpretation of John Willis’s ‘three approaches to administrative law’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Opposition (politics); Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Constitutional interpretation","score_opus":0.07232671953910134,"score_gpt":0.28953992751324215,"score_spread":0.2172132079741408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102689192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029097067,0.007326329,0.101062275,0.25914925,0.0025945038,0.00009266189,0.00020470606,0.0001832413,0.60029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9110894,0.0026180742,0.022963557,0.017891167,0.0017324658,0.00017000573,0.00008527084,0.000123412,0.043326642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914255,0.0030102357,0.00027537651,0.0009656286,0.0032250502,0.0010981967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572515,0.0014157499,0.0003339744,0.0005190375,0.0015177897,0.00048821385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062205936,0.00067087234,0.0004649373,0.0042209676,0.008897779,0.012706577,0.0025715197,0.005249667,0.0030126397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009920688,0.00042310986,0.0007628847,0.0029768308,0.06267683,0.009133134,0.004754855,0.007617212,0.00043412863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.152293e-7,0.0000013427607,0.000021743932,0.0000031470177,4.722429e-7,0.000007319401,0.0017030897,0.000024391536,0.000013549174,0.9965629,0.0011168267,0.00054430123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011040909,0.000009395092,0.00039727907,0.00006627629,0.0000059451995,0.00006313173,0.0027301155,0.0007326601,0.00012647647,0.8335147,0.1623161,0.000026861708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12736921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12935653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12736921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024713153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027623385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25325572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102692710","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0040","title":"Multidisciplinary Marty Friedland, miscarriages of justice, and the modern law school","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Multidisciplinary approach; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Social injustice; Focus (optics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.014064567837728262,"score_gpt":0.30338030359581064,"score_spread":0.2893157357580824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102692710","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030514397,0.14253417,0.003342334,0.6837144,0.0024078554,0.000013324364,0.00002344566,0.000033031753,0.13741717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83550465,0.06193355,0.0023570892,0.061090544,0.0051663797,0.00004684843,0.000018688854,0.00004698104,0.033835337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975055,0.0013220774,0.0000710424,0.00029377363,0.000480369,0.0003272341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460536,0.0032585922,0.0005892276,0.00021753467,0.00046578769,0.0008633755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039063073,0.00021773452,0.00039492015,0.0021390212,0.013631264,0.006778028,0.0008405741,0.0057658367,0.002725715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057255975,0.0003768595,0.000268013,0.0011721831,0.03952473,0.008131929,0.005310258,0.009475442,0.00028348254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008839949,0.00003539475,0.0008195422,0.00003654687,0.0000036539673,0.00008831157,0.012856834,0.00010580131,0.000035492063,0.94038314,0.033198386,0.012428046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010540779,0.000031590913,0.0025883878,0.000620964,0.000007786052,0.00029074936,0.011668576,0.0002579765,0.000121584526,0.5894806,0.39488572,0.00003552309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030773053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052990638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030773053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0149451215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010145053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108434916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102710797","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0044","title":"Some leading themes in the contract scholarship of Stephen Waddams","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Certainty; Equity (law)","score_opus":0.023318244356577686,"score_gpt":0.29635687343484957,"score_spread":0.27303862907827187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102710797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029839393,0.12294881,0.016434409,0.45924973,0.0048897597,0.000060567214,0.00009158197,0.000061977036,0.36642373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.707593,0.08526245,0.012648444,0.05104859,0.006380455,0.00021391614,0.00006233733,0.0001847387,0.13660611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971034,0.0012504228,0.000062215535,0.00030208996,0.00097220537,0.0003097098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976776,0.0013520019,0.00013264557,0.00009864247,0.00040796,0.00033120828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004161904,0.0004376966,0.00038821728,0.001297088,0.007214394,0.0061495667,0.0010775519,0.0032223877,0.0036822718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006857238,0.00037128173,0.0002901863,0.0022908975,0.020802056,0.006774129,0.0036033737,0.0055799386,0.00065586134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034423276,0.0000067644773,0.00007611867,0.000014668052,5.4961015e-7,0.00003748949,0.0037342568,0.000036738584,0.000022909437,0.9781068,0.015708733,0.002251476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079529145,0.000019057883,0.00039909038,0.00034923415,0.0000019039908,0.00019869542,0.0065234206,0.0003875771,0.000105925465,0.52765745,0.46432903,0.000020731493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020477576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020682696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020477576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007479455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067959386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054267526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102741097","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0064","title":"On living federal lives: Katherine Swinton’s <i>The Supreme Court and Canadian Federalism</i> and the future of federal imagination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Disenchantment; Originalism; Legitimacy; Constitutional law; Politics; Economic Justice; Principle of legality","score_opus":0.004502356691243037,"score_gpt":0.21590702195478098,"score_spread":0.21140466526353793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102741097","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011354712,0.07829609,0.0010617952,0.7390581,0.0048066564,0.000021965925,0.00014900137,0.000042716725,0.16520895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5363002,0.07876799,0.0024751448,0.20760603,0.003456243,0.000061760555,0.00016912995,0.00017335505,0.17099014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958858,0.00080775045,0.00004861007,0.0003874149,0.0016760867,0.0011943853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969639,0.00095609395,0.00008947709,0.00009002832,0.0012142065,0.0006862426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027748921,0.0004281964,0.0004143102,0.0018551756,0.035482727,0.011957486,0.0015962793,0.0044100923,0.004440447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049000573,0.00029718908,0.00029069136,0.0025563976,0.029891752,0.0053723822,0.0026417058,0.007130058,0.0004164681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001231823,0.000011960093,0.00043329186,0.000037720678,0.000006311825,0.00011763383,0.0180065,0.00010525278,0.00010972702,0.6393861,0.3259521,0.015820988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007704169,0.0000048608263,0.0015288658,0.00026974917,0.000007736425,0.000060866783,0.014726666,0.0001300556,0.00011409236,0.062084407,0.92101175,0.00005325132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97187084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98779154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12518552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12518552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115124874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9082888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102758668","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0035","title":"A rule-of-law compliant reading of section 33: The continuing relevance of Lorraine Weinrib’s public law scholarship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Section (typography); Legislature; Scholarship; Rule of law; Public law; Legislation","score_opus":0.028029359702664902,"score_gpt":0.26856022067914115,"score_spread":0.24053086097647625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102758668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01259197,0.013469769,0.014812685,0.71851283,0.0042201295,0.000021295822,0.000057606467,0.000091834336,0.2362218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7882625,0.008091116,0.005941209,0.1355153,0.005422897,0.0000624013,0.000053312546,0.00019349823,0.056457777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275255,0.0024284958,0.00017463403,0.0009352708,0.0026623863,0.0010466367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835856,0.011438651,0.0005467866,0.0013387003,0.0023142537,0.0007761269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009868597,0.00028471276,0.00065904536,0.0013582,0.011044075,0.0148608,0.0019855655,0.010383061,0.0031195057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021961054,0.0004398109,0.0005067243,0.0015531915,0.04163685,0.012425323,0.0037181617,0.019267736,0.0007278412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032422074,0.0000098132305,0.00006788354,0.0000068855716,8.877262e-7,0.000022843571,0.001665955,0.00009420615,0.000024957599,0.982916,0.011951981,0.0032353427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010310821,0.000012231275,0.00035190914,0.00019263437,0.000004544012,0.000043748063,0.0020000427,0.0007025635,0.00020781637,0.6849569,0.31149015,0.000027035578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110616006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10462175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110616006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024290424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02556107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2199443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102759388","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0052","title":"Transforming spousal support from the ground up: Carol Rogerson and the development of the spousal support advisory guidelines","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Negotiation; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Exaggeration; Set (abstract data type); Advisory committee","score_opus":0.0265818875826978,"score_gpt":0.27782091103299517,"score_spread":0.25123902345029736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102759388","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008213267,0.0066155475,0.003090248,0.92855483,0.002460079,0.00005603862,0.000020483607,0.00005353672,0.05093602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5793429,0.015333126,0.01917863,0.27945298,0.0023282047,0.0003041114,0.0000521276,0.00036246103,0.103645526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96859264,0.01625387,0.00078565197,0.0015537924,0.008962215,0.003851915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94474614,0.025773184,0.0014124,0.0013703938,0.017052103,0.009645815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027049042,0.00040838303,0.00048273674,0.001971691,0.031799354,0.015288656,0.002658081,0.010580293,0.0030806973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061360717,0.00077578606,0.00041020944,0.001544788,0.04176222,0.009216695,0.0054021482,0.021301592,0.00063269894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019140149,0.000039719343,0.001323927,0.000058364833,0.000007197832,0.00048506554,0.091178365,0.00026591175,0.00018217864,0.48477888,0.38370088,0.037960287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018009187,0.000016099882,0.0005600363,0.00036506765,0.000009012571,0.00016505599,0.047000997,0.0002883873,0.00028228044,0.041264676,0.90991044,0.000119847056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.727563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83037513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.727563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051109254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12631786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5480828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102811689","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0046","title":"Individual freedom and the supremacy of law: Alan Brudner on criminal justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminal law; Hegelianism; Subject (documents); Politics; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.021949593535058234,"score_gpt":0.23545805812761478,"score_spread":0.21350846459255654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102811689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026707442,0.10701964,0.008478825,0.34963462,0.0019903486,0.000023871988,0.000054504664,0.000044043478,0.5060467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8345572,0.04975466,0.0038475443,0.033036295,0.0023963947,0.000060303064,0.00003218087,0.00006778983,0.07624762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819857,0.00088741013,0.000043418575,0.00020251828,0.00040280947,0.00026530985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774724,0.0015839614,0.00012959707,0.00010088364,0.00023123017,0.00020703454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029747372,0.0002840339,0.0004595875,0.0014812096,0.0069826334,0.0056375605,0.0007564379,0.0035384612,0.0023667973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036645718,0.0003236308,0.0002101334,0.0011862399,0.03283863,0.0064317277,0.0023017162,0.0055197286,0.0006669165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006447499,0.000008080484,0.00006962084,0.000009662757,0.0000010559789,0.00001887846,0.0015788535,0.00011984515,0.000013063939,0.9878693,0.007983347,0.0023218656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008199053,0.0000059065023,0.00024406302,0.000118493714,0.000002324634,0.00004326537,0.0007446392,0.00024178663,0.000044558034,0.8840795,0.114453994,0.000013222225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02112536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02301456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02112536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008548969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044028624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062027454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102812399","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0051","title":"Professor Alan Mewett on morality and the criminal law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Morality; Public morality; Foundation (evidence); Public law; Criminal procedure; Focus (optics); Comparative law","score_opus":0.02755648655297038,"score_gpt":0.33728179897787536,"score_spread":0.309725312424905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102812399","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018191352,0.115782775,0.0016416516,0.77864176,0.0065630823,0.000024518109,0.00007629022,0.00003334246,0.09541742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14441164,0.179344,0.0048542344,0.2620482,0.00881268,0.00011417829,0.00010833404,0.00011805529,0.40018865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716645,0.00081618235,0.000071715665,0.00033431273,0.0012000623,0.00041131483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603575,0.0016912841,0.00015871039,0.00009010041,0.001336824,0.000687294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024165406,0.00036757643,0.00038869554,0.0011976698,0.007985002,0.0050686,0.0010764602,0.004027548,0.0050850334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064127897,0.00032519578,0.0002601589,0.0011782516,0.013872563,0.004892154,0.0017964278,0.01092815,0.0015549072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011508815,0.000013248548,0.00031264324,0.00006074875,0.000004077403,0.00006727892,0.0033496716,0.00012631327,0.00006907753,0.31030893,0.6657265,0.019949991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039662837,0.000004445896,0.0004460421,0.00023023825,0.0000029817638,0.00007815583,0.00093680265,0.00009793378,0.00008065382,0.041402187,0.9566991,0.000017565108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38994458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5159533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38994458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022928448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023986766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77534974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102830595","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0037","title":"‘More legal theory than I thought’: Robert Sharpe and legal scholarship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal realism; Legal formalism; Normative; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Scholarship; Habeas corpus; Legal profession; Legal opinion","score_opus":0.008113778256324878,"score_gpt":0.25199561264418585,"score_spread":0.24388183438786099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102830595","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046073403,0.16727139,0.006611619,0.6962396,0.0034657528,0.000017729477,0.00004295842,0.000046615718,0.1216969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6402893,0.11758786,0.010345986,0.1435166,0.018325498,0.0001649287,0.000084530424,0.00019796503,0.0694874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99327624,0.0045453813,0.00020398825,0.00056957616,0.0010040565,0.0004007169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890308,0.007958476,0.0005338535,0.00065654796,0.0012393523,0.00058100454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076286285,0.000595652,0.000802141,0.0031368644,0.0067102136,0.010774078,0.0016296486,0.0077703204,0.0043865307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016133795,0.00045842148,0.0005233555,0.003280637,0.05439246,0.019435026,0.0029983972,0.012166124,0.0008996281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029220212,0.0000078522935,0.000037740392,0.000027933447,0.0000017803386,0.000028027696,0.002483582,0.00006461065,0.000017266111,0.97197837,0.022226833,0.003123044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011577148,0.000010803001,0.00014919585,0.00031168538,0.0000032565185,0.00006396042,0.0029614288,0.00016395087,0.00005429307,0.7344368,0.2618168,0.00001621138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015511844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013843506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015511844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006714802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07197064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104003265","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0095","title":"Old habits die hard: Precedent, psychology, and the admissibility of forensic evidence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Scientific evidence; Scrutiny; Cognitive bias; Harm; Acknowledgement; Deference; Rigour; Cognition; Delusion","score_opus":0.03903203113210236,"score_gpt":0.34721307698462583,"score_spread":0.3081810458525235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104003265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30206403,0.04176909,0.05076362,0.25589934,0.0026203557,0.00019379541,0.00008637156,0.00013410527,0.34646937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763727,0.004254219,0.00667578,0.009603218,0.00054152595,0.00004114319,0.000020451442,0.00003294266,0.0024580285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97795314,0.012116118,0.0008091155,0.0026655705,0.005208663,0.0012475466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87642515,0.09509322,0.011202711,0.0042884727,0.008342959,0.0046473886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03771165,0.00038546065,0.00050593715,0.0041823313,0.0077388627,0.011180319,0.001777113,0.005741448,0.0035680197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109837905,0.00062799436,0.0004871877,0.0016510905,0.06611284,0.0115982685,0.004588363,0.0069019715,0.0005467867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014819943,0.00020203734,0.015393728,0.00030010098,0.000074440235,0.00070645043,0.028569182,0.0008681718,0.00068812974,0.8737425,0.008978855,0.070328236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049674603,0.0001141028,0.01542109,0.0006276318,0.00003694264,0.0005932622,0.008869592,0.0009259102,0.00038965192,0.9437379,0.029126931,0.000107379135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066891303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007921972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03771165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005381823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007341732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19944066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104057871","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0014","title":"Employer reputation and the right of workers to a private life in dismissal cases: Finding the balance in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Balance (ability); Unfair dismissal; Reputation; Test (biology); Work–life balance; Expansive; Industrial relations","score_opus":0.0059602205558194855,"score_gpt":0.21293552317215506,"score_spread":0.20697530261633557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104057871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050003,0.0022891157,0.0005704537,0.025483334,0.00017798321,0.00011639542,0.00031288483,0.000013415601,0.066036016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935762,0.00051800034,0.00013872841,0.0009723118,0.00001793223,0.000013703028,0.000056347355,0.000006694653,0.0047001163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98720443,0.0011104607,0.00040939555,0.000781745,0.0036861806,0.006807715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722056,0.005004093,0.0036666703,0.0007070783,0.008866529,0.009549964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051996903,0.00023079898,0.00082027004,0.002850518,0.027683917,0.008663089,0.0038451713,0.003127504,0.0062293843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0323704,0.0006105091,0.0005881837,0.0041610147,0.008584109,0.0027329258,0.0062192315,0.0049671778,0.00029471173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042936293,0.0005693222,0.63657486,0.00033755024,0.00014583547,0.006271534,0.098349035,0.0015070216,0.00067505834,0.14225587,0.036442548,0.07644196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010828971,0.00012584309,0.7602694,0.0011900179,0.00019166814,0.001198232,0.16293234,0.003719097,0.0004762308,0.011351127,0.058108598,0.00032923286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113798745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113798745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15245569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82567155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165112071","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0024","title":"Theology in <i>Vincent v Lake Erie</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Relevance (law); Damages; Property (philosophy); Private property; Economic Justice; Natural law; Property rights; Obligation; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.00755479912293219,"score_gpt":0.25438042034466074,"score_spread":0.24682562122172855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165112071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018528277,0.014253454,0.0019578736,0.0814109,0.0032243803,0.000026034855,0.00007820045,0.00007187172,0.880449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54715663,0.0042876727,0.0008537609,0.03023833,0.0015858015,0.000070217175,0.00006728375,0.0001252989,0.415615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988261,0.00038976825,0.000023376686,0.00016510343,0.00021422736,0.00038145017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978894,0.00007536566,0.000031004103,0.000021901995,0.000045253415,0.000037538088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073852285,0.00033523058,0.00020859428,0.00045541467,0.0057908967,0.0062956153,0.000822832,0.0038852643,0.0052339067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014930961,0.0003108389,0.00023578733,0.00048486944,0.009331085,0.0035234904,0.0027083496,0.0059453906,0.0008320473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011188879,0.000003949869,0.00007477147,0.000014707097,0.0000014630484,0.00014284349,0.00467115,0.00003158767,0.00010098091,0.93217164,0.060778376,0.0019973507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006333193,0.000009267231,0.00046532066,0.00009493355,0.0000030314543,0.00018893498,0.0033124073,0.00006928987,0.00018241337,0.041136615,0.9545167,0.000014798559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07915056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088304855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07915056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008058598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031861796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15737969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165185624","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0103","title":"Beyond economic allegiance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Jurisdiction; Nexus (standard); Equity (law); Normative; Politics","score_opus":0.0063011530924254175,"score_gpt":0.18222871426504625,"score_spread":0.17592756117262084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165185624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009808963,0.0033176458,0.06316534,0.03440269,0.00089572417,0.000058266516,0.000070889284,0.000114332324,0.8881662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8360529,0.0032103215,0.0148833655,0.015402659,0.0016197524,0.00026833944,0.000112205635,0.0002570052,0.12819348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814897,0.0068351873,0.00078655634,0.0033644692,0.0056443317,0.0018797125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98638827,0.0056573027,0.0009181071,0.003401342,0.0031127303,0.0005222376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017691795,0.0008244016,0.0010790819,0.0025437605,0.009175698,0.015046522,0.002647383,0.006870246,0.011923687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030331837,0.00054370257,0.00095714297,0.001812878,0.043666843,0.018789046,0.01130161,0.011670471,0.0027898427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016840833,0.0000021106905,0.00004209791,0.0000069160037,0.0000014460195,0.0000053230924,0.0001970826,0.00006288046,0.000012950268,0.9978332,0.00048491306,0.0013493202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009519701,0.000013088814,0.00013691155,0.00013095564,0.000008221394,0.000050317543,0.000312494,0.0003124791,0.00017864161,0.86745894,0.13137232,0.00001598386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009117988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009021614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017691795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009674866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012955652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09356427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165203122","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0005","title":"Is law an intellectual practice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029475989745648953,"score_gpt":0.3601314257086606,"score_spread":0.3306554359630116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165203122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018967267,0.009504798,0.000640683,0.68577045,0.0021260104,0.000017194969,0.00010082286,0.0000590817,0.28281367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8485431,0.012005994,0.0009745526,0.031364482,0.0018134449,0.000037020774,0.00009319154,0.00007435449,0.10509377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930264,0.0026908536,0.00024458754,0.0005975128,0.0019669842,0.001473702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969236,0.011551786,0.0024340749,0.002039737,0.0047321483,0.010006242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008884299,0.000292342,0.00051984296,0.0015815874,0.0126699405,0.024825612,0.0013068321,0.007134732,0.022851447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027589414,0.00034483313,0.0002555348,0.0028532166,0.06579949,0.0101889325,0.0048624747,0.0067395386,0.0019985219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016199298,0.000037289225,0.0016107109,0.0001264804,0.00000687703,0.00018628083,0.030420594,0.000072839895,0.00008195781,0.83848137,0.105461225,0.023498205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029238578,0.000030526146,0.0077218525,0.0006819887,0.000021340256,0.0001744804,0.08979539,0.00021706051,0.00019844438,0.19916947,0.7019231,0.000037162557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4067783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6190966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4067783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047202572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0856797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8088212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165206146","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0006","title":"The demise of parliamentary divorce in Ontario: The 1930 <i>Divorce Act</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Demise; Parliament; Legislature; Institution; Federal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.006058721604103293,"score_gpt":0.1946975838619056,"score_spread":0.18863886225780233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165206146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57262295,0.007344809,0.0011025849,0.105744496,0.00069368526,0.000103377184,0.00077945576,0.00006446355,0.31154418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410905,0.0020452351,0.00026045938,0.0047164857,0.00007313997,0.00002126488,0.00007793346,0.00002750497,0.051687434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966114,0.00038051404,0.00009438534,0.00022851306,0.0009037699,0.0017814226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761,0.00033295326,0.00031292293,0.00009613317,0.0006480323,0.0010000279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022672443,0.00014975156,0.00025945294,0.00087899674,0.03557977,0.0049275183,0.0013528507,0.0025310812,0.0044474504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004216657,0.00057862455,0.00033006963,0.001743358,0.012714296,0.0015628977,0.0035844846,0.0038686853,0.00035705045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018621254,0.000047588623,0.043031678,0.00015483978,0.000034286346,0.002563803,0.34805563,0.000542428,0.0018714997,0.49305436,0.07905884,0.03139882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043541837,0.000039613773,0.12561741,0.00020287039,0.00005594088,0.00032040602,0.091408595,0.00055554294,0.0009985222,0.007856045,0.77277833,0.0001231927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99712497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23494166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23494166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17682855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88735926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}