{"meta":{"query_hash":"0786b22b38fc","filters":{"venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal"},"cohort_total":571,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":571,"exported":571,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0786b22b38fc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=University+of+Toronto+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1543831736","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2605","title":"Administrative decentralization and tax compliance: A transactional cost perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Tax law; Tax reform; Phenomenon; Context (archaeology); Public economics; Bureaucracy; Indirect tax; Administrative law; Double taxation; Business; Value-added tax; Economics; Ad valorem tax; China; Public administration; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.10012939627459912,"score_gpt":0.2682444937450942,"score_spread":0.16811509747049508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543831736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017672181,0.011724867,0.14992483,0.0027713745,0.0007147867,0.0003219713,0.0003793547,0.000033451648,0.8164572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710244,0.00058559695,0.0015960633,0.000043829594,0.000033430748,1.0241655e-7,0.00000190371,0.000002883468,0.0006337317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996298,0.000012707945,0.0001199408,0.00010867535,0.000039432114,0.00008942879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944246,0.000010141709,0.00022825455,0.000044106273,0.00017103953,0.00010400637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010452707,0.00005801365,0.00014918626,0.000016386812,0.00022803119,0.000021681215,0.00007466055,0.00002828653,0.00057652016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015527066,0.000073629235,0.000043159755,0.000023633369,0.0001300605,0.0003914754,0.000011300545,0.00006056174,0.0000136525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017600936,0.000100626414,0.011344794,0.000007774777,0.00013095286,0.000007876062,0.014091072,0.00008979477,0.000004239647,0.9708159,0.0027055452,0.0005254379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072724377,0.0007079659,0.195997,0.00010190447,0.000055165372,0.000174758,0.21272518,0.0017569348,0.000043233405,0.08575937,0.49475878,0.0006472657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061416733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011024449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97943026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035350592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027898132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92844135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764645577","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2660","title":"Taking purposes seriously: The purposive scope and textual bounds of interpretation under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Originalism; Meaning (existential); Judicial interpretation; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01907488820453316,"score_gpt":0.240325353376364,"score_spread":0.22125046517183083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764645577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6578853,0.006822509,0.00022733521,0.005759897,0.0002917775,0.00030910125,0.000027054137,0.0000049405576,0.32867205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996399,0.0001799583,0.000037765563,0.00004564673,0.000046893572,6.208651e-8,2.2314171e-7,7.5686114e-7,0.000048753544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953514,0.000081083876,0.00007209031,0.000045153003,0.00018194817,0.00008455223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947387,0.00004672538,0.00014691209,0.000032744265,0.0002217414,0.00007799233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028442746,0.00003837263,0.000090143396,0.000011736441,0.0012422787,0.00002721153,0.00013168548,0.000029069608,0.00005228408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017780749,0.00002530954,0.000025827027,0.000022858932,0.0018625588,0.00024809045,0.00003538245,0.000054155833,2.4022776e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007860738,0.00001597528,0.0026167098,0.0000031965542,0.00016058114,0.0000050032236,0.090905294,0.000017845126,0.000040871753,0.9018809,0.0005696231,0.003705359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016866424,0.00052880426,0.12426121,0.00033671974,0.0003765823,0.000057525718,0.65442497,0.00009556626,0.00008969043,0.09697346,0.12085738,0.00031144897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9596109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8049075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014151105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023116714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95547295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184234808","doi":"10.3138/utlj.102913r","title":"Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Democracy; Epistemology; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Presentation (obstetrics); Communicative action; Critical theory; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.008568229017063117,"score_gpt":0.23772919759403602,"score_spread":0.2291609685769729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184234808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04192759,0.0012347304,0.00039012643,0.003713466,0.00018443288,0.00006915922,0.000005633336,0.000010372856,0.95246446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642944,0.0008442598,0.0003469299,0.00021439898,0.00012412321,1.0191345e-8,2.528956e-7,0.000001967224,0.0020386416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926996,0.00029262668,0.00006608093,0.00005570253,0.00020236975,0.000113276255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995115,0.00011729532,0.00012633378,0.000079186095,0.000090228874,0.000075464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081661093,0.000044527143,0.00009841524,9.1483565e-7,0.0015917978,0.000020524589,0.00027755118,0.00006134593,0.0005432186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020782594,0.000032305958,0.00008901813,0.000013180723,0.0015676424,0.0003974287,0.00004402176,0.00010678855,0.0000010073707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017407103,0.000019774088,0.00016708874,0.0000034803581,0.00003148813,9.325496e-7,0.049630187,0.0000021222004,0.00003533853,0.94736934,0.0011485085,0.0015743215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005103067,0.000059890615,0.001316848,0.000042746185,0.000104420586,0.000007200372,0.20806709,0.000008169519,0.00004517145,0.077200405,0.7125392,0.000098568555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018905204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09400369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9545018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049668655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028259117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1856655805","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3205","title":"Disgorgement: From property to contract","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Property (philosophy); Breach of contract; Law and economics; Exclusion clause; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Damages; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03433791124766411,"score_gpt":0.2617073319479883,"score_spread":0.22736942070032418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1856655805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0377224,0.00022430807,0.00041321208,0.0017061463,0.00042762735,0.00008310081,0.000015829934,0.000017421853,0.9593899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98804736,0.00009368881,0.0008216598,0.00032801923,0.00027972844,1.4531818e-8,0.0000015490454,0.0000035340051,0.010424424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992331,0.00012523706,0.00008477832,0.00007707054,0.00035209613,0.00012767641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921685,0.00002714677,0.00008261628,0.000063443455,0.0002925649,0.00031735617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000341809,0.000046208006,0.00009021001,0.000008851273,0.00031746866,0.000047404388,0.00034663884,0.000025727697,0.0025592598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007412647,0.000039010833,0.000056453126,0.000014726043,0.000100802325,0.00062174164,0.000043654833,0.00006958963,0.00008027022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006441874,0.00030019827,0.0027444565,0.0000020179848,0.00021235558,0.00017121536,0.048982017,0.000054068943,0.0006038393,0.8873264,0.044178367,0.014780886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046786194,0.00006871869,0.001993323,0.00001750894,0.000013363104,6.900744e-7,0.005681044,0.000014835917,0.000020328745,0.00024798219,0.9914106,0.00006374016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23978454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24976608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95032495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035780354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097786615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965314229","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0717","title":"How to redistribute? A critical examination of mechanisms to promote global wealth redistribution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Economics; Distributive justice; Public economics; Redistribution of income and wealth; Distributive property; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Law; Public good","score_opus":0.010327840355007098,"score_gpt":0.20834118173438446,"score_spread":0.19801334137937737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965314229","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08107046,0.000021433381,0.8700813,0.009520651,0.0005149968,0.00025795028,0.000079485515,0.00004872877,0.03840499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490196,0.0000018943796,0.0046204193,0.00016978363,0.00018741643,8.8809635e-8,0.000015939893,0.0000032660516,0.00009920804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925566,0.000025454257,0.00013708073,0.00013220879,0.000293004,0.00015659344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894536,0.000012281141,0.0002739848,0.000107828346,0.000603539,0.000056982066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049023965,0.00008130054,0.00015429332,0.000028476763,0.00024175525,0.00008410164,0.00020793297,0.000046191868,0.00014418548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025606397,0.0000913373,0.000056913646,0.00011345271,0.0000393581,0.0009495822,0.000095410556,0.000056668545,0.000010686477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010320143,0.00008570129,0.000088722474,0.000067563546,0.000010798728,0.0000069307666,0.000086611944,0.000025453035,0.0044274824,0.975278,0.0027052858,0.017114213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048016035,0.0011611198,0.099951334,0.00097353134,0.00037303663,0.00007081652,0.010215054,0.0112610515,0.0034214815,0.07351395,0.79300296,0.0012540689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002138632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063810367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91383153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025554613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019538025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3724627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965994057","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2486","title":"Residential schools litigation and the legal profession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legitimacy; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.011547366703732291,"score_gpt":0.29239031262039017,"score_spread":0.28084294591665787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965994057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08671407,0.00017531072,0.001843677,0.16980246,0.0009522175,0.00017239318,0.0000014052034,0.00001952606,0.74031895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536496,0.00012812094,0.0006388226,0.0001860132,0.00024775474,3.7341056e-8,5.912607e-7,0.0000011964776,0.0034324995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919975,0.00043360703,0.00007161031,0.000043191772,0.0001838119,0.00006802196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942315,0.000121633755,0.00014826587,0.00005075159,0.00020099292,0.000055232587],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012353837,0.000025425032,0.000050495266,0.00000954481,0.0017174762,0.00011824104,0.00012048791,0.00003471085,0.00064740254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028035813,0.000020998394,0.000025422652,0.0000299564,0.00028114935,0.0015028126,0.000018944278,0.00020435073,0.0000046716864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058706817,0.00001142029,0.00020824173,0.0000014809821,0.000008004054,3.2148148e-7,0.0139431795,8.131864e-7,0.000028537357,0.97775036,0.005611885,0.0023770572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007761165,0.0000174627,0.0032239764,0.000020826661,0.000024102093,0.000004315013,0.06139621,0.000026595819,0.0000141416795,0.0062163915,0.92823905,0.000040823266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21297427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1689683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97153395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000843691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020574257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966275155","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2499","title":"Residential schools, respect, and responsibilities for past harms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Scope (computer science); Active listening; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Relation (database); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.011223534804351204,"score_gpt":0.2595761314823836,"score_spread":0.24835259667803242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966275155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5864172,0.00081440783,0.0013178819,0.00212787,0.0011298294,0.00041036605,0.00001639521,0.000032642914,0.40773344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645233,0.003987088,0.0041950066,0.000026385434,0.0014736161,3.346682e-8,0.0000019086317,0.000006918752,0.025785718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908537,0.00029004618,0.00010784193,0.000104071754,0.00019719992,0.00021548198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992195,0.00013815984,0.00012501841,0.00008435303,0.0002621242,0.00017088397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013307141,0.000050737213,0.00011225373,0.000025323763,0.008374782,0.00005349759,0.00017354284,0.00006927163,0.0002569848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016697468,0.00004973028,0.000055290555,0.000016897915,0.00027945978,0.00048954145,0.0000022724805,0.000087581895,0.0000024699218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029008818,0.00003689813,0.00047022203,0.000019710611,0.000019689574,0.000001668607,0.22476698,8.473775e-7,0.000007769962,0.77179885,0.0021849459,0.00040233968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004100336,0.00012239555,0.002203767,0.000024737745,0.000018891513,0.000004430615,0.052766506,0.0000027053024,0.000018729132,0.0053447476,0.93901664,0.00006643828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.553008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98750204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93683165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003080867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014531645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99291617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966706145","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.deal","title":"THE JUDICIAL INVENTION OF PROPERTY NORMS: ELLICKSON’S WHALEMEN REVISITED","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whaling; Law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Philosophy; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.007731500490552293,"score_gpt":0.17667975169458153,"score_spread":0.16894825120402923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966706145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3639446,0.0036266062,0.00070279825,0.00068621855,0.00042640147,0.0002958395,0.000012927354,0.000016310607,0.6302883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945608,0.001052459,0.00046890235,0.000043957578,0.00006590645,4.671056e-8,0.0000013521595,0.000003962111,0.0038026203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993364,0.00006533486,0.000115888404,0.00006368563,0.00026643672,0.0001522447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999562,0.0000135849805,0.00022122558,0.00009438165,0.0000070118117,0.00010177358],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024244365,0.000059611837,0.0000974934,0.000004407289,0.00044955328,0.0000020686864,0.000219471,0.000027895509,0.0030027516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000030125589,0.000037417954,0.00009402762,0.000019931733,0.0014230993,0.0004273858,0.000111193476,0.0000754566,0.000040157713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023686558,0.0032852918,0.31322125,0.00010706282,0.0007500504,0.000056095796,0.053524297,0.00067354715,0.06415949,0.019199982,0.29664645,0.24600783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003355687,0.00014465206,0.05559879,0.000025549978,0.000044608838,0.000029310311,0.007042163,0.000023951314,0.00014256366,0.00009801366,0.9364109,0.00010394498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015845142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051816516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6397644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005056457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061450987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967664096","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0048","title":"Giving voice to reality: Michael Trebilcock and pension governance issues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Pension; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Finance","score_opus":0.016384007647004012,"score_gpt":0.20818598397525256,"score_spread":0.19180197632824855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967664096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8686978,0.0024371766,0.00073522556,0.0023040366,0.0007016844,0.000094114206,0.00008272235,0.00002035692,0.12492684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98840934,0.0019750036,0.0045686853,0.00018074451,0.00018176055,4.129154e-8,9.962655e-7,0.000011102185,0.0046723075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992772,0.000013094981,0.00022272335,0.00022589868,0.000053229014,0.00020787543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992396,0.000022517834,0.00032078856,0.00019957525,0.000060167193,0.00015732126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003193854,0.000107902,0.00029945045,0.00002731848,0.00034808193,0.000043211723,0.00023143442,0.000093992785,0.000582763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001527354,0.00013679055,0.000081571874,0.000034025867,0.00009633978,0.00057113357,0.00009660157,0.00019971258,0.000039886338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002552861,0.00023158139,0.019304905,0.00007997607,0.0001235716,0.00012900721,0.01839524,0.000044548866,0.0040393574,0.9194036,0.022914657,0.015078279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005057218,0.00007912413,0.04874534,0.00003603158,0.0000073993647,0.000047568123,0.00031395827,0.00012169788,0.00009667919,0.00089510484,0.9489706,0.0001807508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093927994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14315882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92605597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001077119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013269542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9121056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968518342","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0015","title":"Murdering Holiness: The Trials of Franz Creffield and George Mitchell (review)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Philosophy; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.028364857741183785,"score_gpt":0.29161271836724917,"score_spread":0.26324786062606537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968518342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028989568,0.04999857,0.0016762157,0.007834626,0.00036241795,0.00025842278,0.00004553051,0.000014107089,0.91082054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97177297,0.026627539,0.0006438459,0.00029720814,0.00015276864,2.49478e-8,5.1977423e-7,0.0000015752987,0.0005035732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933785,0.00016186325,0.00016349791,0.000047592333,0.00018304605,0.000106171334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993227,0.00019859368,0.00022660829,0.00005782558,0.00011576108,0.00007851803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010088041,0.00004438632,0.00021777248,0.0000058935,0.00052134326,0.000006562483,0.00017849552,0.000036467536,0.00059724384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015299021,0.000035124558,0.00010861959,0.000020003281,0.0007806321,0.00014221256,0.000027697433,0.000078878824,9.022423e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016214874,0.000021343556,0.00008280753,0.00002707663,0.000037846792,0.000005640307,0.0021732186,0.000022750299,0.000042466956,0.99592847,0.00050664187,0.0011355495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004991695,0.000037480513,0.0003703546,0.0002775902,0.0001094571,0.000012825935,0.008615495,5.7983596e-7,0.000037894308,0.0009476311,0.98902124,0.00007025272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12887782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040142268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000697165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002996412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97737265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969163031","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0064","title":"Why is this taking so long?: The move toward a national securities regulator","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regulator; Business; Regulatory authority; Law and economics; Accounting; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.018817514721210415,"score_gpt":0.19348312394984654,"score_spread":0.17466560922863614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969163031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14987442,0.0036856486,0.0011025448,0.0053040623,0.0030596373,0.00021901453,0.00033868803,0.00003146059,0.83638453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683297,0.0003384263,0.00028278,0.00097358297,0.0006086494,1.3903954e-7,0.0000023699176,0.000011092206,0.0009500201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917936,0.00001787299,0.00033855595,0.00018190981,0.00007843817,0.00020388061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988291,0.000042448683,0.00073165575,0.00017152869,0.00012830965,0.00009694793],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062867266,0.00009503661,0.00028969106,0.000038209444,0.0007028329,0.00013415734,0.0004598286,0.00012281624,0.008003404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033996468,0.00011678169,0.00022344501,0.000024183235,0.00037856092,0.000696317,0.000076315824,0.0002338746,0.000067245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032897944,0.00004136019,0.0059377537,0.000015207716,0.00015746866,0.0000057534003,0.008173517,0.000011052778,0.000015141743,0.950455,0.034811217,0.0003436293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007947156,0.000048250036,0.011244355,0.000028361737,0.000015856478,0.000058462712,0.0021184082,0.00051303726,0.00004853656,0.06124948,0.9236254,0.0002551326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06829516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072829954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8892055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000287589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052858908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969347150","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0022","title":"Blackstone in America: Selected Essays of Kathryn Preyer (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Style (visual arts); Supreme court; Affection; Memoir; History; Law; Classics; Sociology; Art history; Political science; Art; Psychology; Literature","score_opus":0.017880209350935587,"score_gpt":0.24474282630755573,"score_spread":0.22686261695662013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969347150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010568617,0.004130524,0.00035900262,0.00017947737,0.00008734365,0.000085773776,0.000013868064,0.000008885003,0.9845665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890651,0.008072961,0.0017489686,0.00010269996,0.00003821816,3.3604735e-8,8.9055584e-7,0.0000023425494,0.0009687849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923563,0.00016420589,0.00014347803,0.000067434885,0.00021939618,0.00016988399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929833,0.00004121337,0.00020972246,0.00006900557,0.00027063064,0.00011110034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023044775,0.000053936343,0.00019826744,0.000016091879,0.00021256121,0.0000019375839,0.00024504287,0.00003995475,0.0035362248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004631728,0.000059329817,0.00007004509,0.00008043113,0.001118342,0.00026682258,0.00002692075,0.00009736503,0.0000046516443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000421809,0.00012978248,0.0043398417,0.000033270306,0.00004643631,0.00002737593,0.0075814896,0.0000033149483,0.000039929986,0.98335636,0.003280737,0.0011192741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083875144,0.0002489404,0.01933615,0.00058460387,0.00014809883,0.000016847305,0.020367645,0.0000055574556,0.0000744164,0.0009413879,0.95715266,0.000284958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2820442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12325726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027586805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066899223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99737465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969559824","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0070","title":"Bilateralism versus multilateralism in international economic law: Applying the principle of subsidiarity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Publishing; Political science; Indigenous; Bilateralism; Politics; Law; Sociology; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.014510088909460999,"score_gpt":0.22628280209898266,"score_spread":0.21177271318952165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969559824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73908055,0.000011308509,0.000026565418,0.0006887931,0.0018577038,0.00013695785,0.0000065560275,0.000010435128,0.25818115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985714,0.000012351723,0.00037207935,0.00057266606,0.00033698409,3.217751e-7,0.000009250892,0.000004575554,0.00012036676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994477,0.000009982946,0.0001906591,0.00009105353,0.00016061068,0.00009998207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994771,0.000025108502,0.00026999883,0.000096334166,0.00011951221,0.000011985136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026462946,0.00007378164,0.00010378708,0.000039848826,0.00017931176,0.00007433619,0.00040680604,0.000046344125,0.0020582755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008970479,0.00006560701,0.000085360894,0.000015521857,0.0001476292,0.0015529379,0.000105431165,0.00017261071,0.000018761959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001607152,0.000047487025,0.0018551601,0.000006126884,0.000037558806,0.0000057625093,0.00016546425,0.000096965756,0.0020368523,0.9953858,0.00009656512,0.00010549837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003057241,0.000016721397,0.012717397,0.000031493266,0.000032068558,0.000008687521,0.0004438285,0.0070364624,0.0008507732,0.004141595,0.9714915,0.00017223202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07307081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2119625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99124426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102055536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016738459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971997154","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0000","title":"Representing Indigenous Self-Determination","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Geography; Political science; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.013262252575638518,"score_gpt":0.25375521245036986,"score_spread":0.24049295987473135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971997154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46042508,0.00022157494,0.00013155375,0.000049822404,0.0003520581,0.000109036606,0.0000010087483,0.000028778824,0.5386811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743376,0.012554575,0.0031248634,0.000008803439,0.00049722265,9.3168735e-9,0.0000015741871,0.0000049330033,0.009470467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990677,0.00018725317,0.00011596051,0.00008937299,0.000296792,0.00024288835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992497,0.000041284373,0.00021007813,0.000085209336,0.00027128044,0.00014243419],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005026574,0.000049008937,0.000097224474,0.00002573064,0.016473759,0.00001599316,0.0002298421,0.00007912292,0.0005012615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027143417,0.00005252018,0.00006638997,0.000035610403,0.00019219714,0.0006556684,0.0000018055017,0.00009964894,0.000010534318],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010509553,0.00011731473,0.0017847461,0.00000860944,0.000016787231,0.000043331587,0.96900576,0.0000022266045,0.0000027204283,0.028350813,0.00009924329,0.0005579149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025258455,0.00005289429,0.0037949032,0.000017431385,0.000019578949,0.00006860456,0.03671585,0.0000075768253,0.00003494128,0.00021081831,0.95872813,0.00009665912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7508659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000638335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002575289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98480666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972016682","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2485","title":"The settlement process: A personal reflection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Population; Process (computing); Sociology; Geography; Business; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010595712501859554,"score_gpt":0.2732135604849558,"score_spread":0.2626178479830963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972016682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05117718,0.00024632167,0.00033290146,0.0012434404,0.00065823324,0.00011413568,0.0000017826227,0.000013824587,0.9462122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816969,0.0045019854,0.00027964383,0.00002669111,0.0007238839,1.9351607e-8,0.0000011577737,0.0000031208642,0.012766594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992371,0.00020180897,0.00007142253,0.000058656107,0.0002490387,0.00018193286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995252,0.00004628843,0.0001252159,0.000045191024,0.00015998336,0.000098156306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076339085,0.000035995276,0.000053550553,0.000007725003,0.01768207,0.000032195945,0.0001752867,0.000040098857,0.00041940509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000022212305,0.000027380685,0.000043595195,0.00002158877,0.00020959559,0.00026404957,7.733604e-7,0.00008184336,0.0000049456753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039030812,0.000048394242,0.00019796609,0.000007266322,0.00001958092,6.3622116e-7,0.56480145,0.0000020484079,0.0000019034546,0.43268237,0.00042053877,0.0017787905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012858248,0.00006132595,0.00031911084,0.000010069183,0.000010429768,0.0000032527037,0.075551875,0.0000130502785,0.0000073042497,0.0010102974,0.92284846,0.00003623182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25742826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98499113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9334456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034558604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012919453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978543247","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0002","title":"Varieties of Vagueness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Philosophy; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.01581975805949516,"score_gpt":0.19431159047135058,"score_spread":0.17849183241185543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978543247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27981427,0.0006484401,0.012090038,0.005178096,0.004000968,0.0001828936,0.00006710964,0.00006337137,0.69795483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766046,0.000041706746,0.0014141606,0.0000148317495,0.0003027092,8.316402e-9,0.0000017309023,0.0000045541124,0.00055984146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995151,0.00002234966,0.00013428202,0.000059638864,0.00017694886,0.00009167699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992989,0.000024296516,0.00021692537,0.00008801892,0.0003307722,0.000041092375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013216132,0.000059691363,0.00014406121,0.000018578621,0.00032777645,0.00002480253,0.00016760477,0.00003028445,0.0025565985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002509702,0.000064037355,0.00008030783,0.0000046154046,0.00023166409,0.0002667635,0.000029518058,0.00006048606,0.0000058036335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034178775,0.000058683774,0.00007021259,0.000017809183,0.00005796143,0.000009562631,0.05384643,0.00011145497,0.000057438803,0.94549805,0.00004320053,0.00019500064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004477745,0.00062982755,0.0041492456,0.00033772888,0.00046826815,0.000060914786,0.22252624,0.00008318326,0.0014532743,0.6825425,0.08275647,0.0005146304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15435144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19121523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71784616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013598085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050557283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978552434","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0012","title":"Future(s) of American legal history","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Critical legal studies; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Legal history; Legal culture; Sociology; Narrative; Political science; Identity (music); Legal profession; Legal realism; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011899754422835447,"score_gpt":0.23535662559417084,"score_spread":0.2234568711713354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978552434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01913443,0.00227524,0.00029714705,0.0003670558,0.0007032661,0.000023648348,0.000008799346,0.00000765661,0.97718275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99464417,0.0003639923,0.0015451116,0.00008300945,0.0006235719,6.2152536e-9,4.825222e-7,0.0000017336788,0.0027379214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993694,0.0001042625,0.000076618904,0.00003643463,0.00023114096,0.00018214736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993948,0.000035396974,0.00019765984,0.00005513981,0.00012046011,0.00019659],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002291177,0.000040861316,0.00012207003,0.000010824446,0.00031505604,0.0000026856796,0.00018001796,0.000026032498,0.002045554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009989026,0.00004613213,0.00008916566,0.000016845215,0.0018255046,0.0004871352,0.000019453535,0.00007167031,0.0000034440773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017122442,0.000040212813,0.0015376757,0.0000016785776,0.00002123954,0.0000026595674,0.0037849667,8.989694e-7,0.000020743848,0.987907,0.005034252,0.0016315359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009112225,0.00003295541,0.0016243451,0.0000045433785,0.000022830152,0.0000063866855,0.022204842,2.42249e-7,0.0000048152638,0.000026018515,0.97593224,0.00004967349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33879188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07896929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074624043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005800265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979206386","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.603","title":"IDEAS, INTERESTS, INSTITUTIONS AND THE HISTORY OF CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY LAW, 1867–1880","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislation; Scholarship; Law; Creditor; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Repeal; State (computer science); Sociology; Economics; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.02171454587795497,"score_gpt":0.24027734574756968,"score_spread":0.21856279986961472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979206386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03193505,0.0006015084,0.00006408301,0.0041053486,0.0004190699,0.00008926655,0.000017774579,0.0000062577988,0.96276164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967186,0.0003566696,0.000377317,0.00010213122,0.00007306507,5.175116e-8,5.969587e-7,0.0000015073593,0.0023700693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995927,0.000055601537,0.00007803176,0.000054729884,0.00011142998,0.000107499916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994764,0.000038805418,0.0000938498,0.00009777199,0.00011195958,0.0001812248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034471066,0.000036265876,0.00008123849,0.000022674887,0.0009013283,0.000015040402,0.0002877389,0.000048457445,0.00077955343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025615262,0.000032172815,0.000055011675,0.000027112592,0.0017490216,0.0002947786,0.000035665103,0.00016264728,0.000002151097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008767176,0.000010398514,0.0001073065,0.0000013752136,0.00001190467,0.0000017827647,0.008968416,0.0000011644015,0.00004842982,0.9875117,0.0028704065,0.00045836787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030113876,0.0000068471945,0.0010401938,0.000007302255,0.000021596128,0.000004585316,0.005261503,0.0000074213995,0.0000019172683,0.0014467915,0.991864,0.000036674835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98899364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003962916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006346198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85355633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979939751","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0002","title":"Putting the Community in Communication: Dissolving the Conflict Between Freedom of Expression and Copyright","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Context (archaeology); Freedom of expression; Compromise; Law; Law and economics; Balance (ability); Public domain; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.020883743707081768,"score_gpt":0.2580742430135937,"score_spread":0.23719049930651195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979939751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7161204,0.002669022,0.000538074,0.0038165248,0.000098572295,0.00021922236,0.0000089778505,0.000015647773,0.27651358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983693,0.00026962868,0.0011532003,0.000012275247,0.000048641552,4.5050594e-8,0.0000016542677,0.0000017748434,0.00014351623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998536,0.0009473327,0.00015738336,0.00003898501,0.00022545899,0.00009485363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987425,0.0006516274,0.00027896673,0.0001874789,0.00010385522,0.000035541547],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001566694,0.000045010966,0.000111687055,0.000012303783,0.0023353682,0.00003790661,0.00053514016,0.000051848605,0.00016590787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005492868,0.000030741674,0.00004111492,0.000035484332,0.00083396723,0.0004173565,0.0001342951,0.0002408861,3.096254e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017338099,0.00040340537,0.13934958,0.000057489848,0.000076944525,0.0000065139197,0.3870985,0.0005339243,0.0085414285,0.42806634,0.025433557,0.010258948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002612127,0.0001005722,0.44723773,0.0008705981,0.00007894131,0.0000067185815,0.34392244,0.00042870766,0.0007239638,0.014973247,0.18881302,0.00023193676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34863755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34424874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4130931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000790603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026586178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982786921","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0016","title":"The Idea of Consideration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Doctrine; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Epistemology; Control (management); Contrast (vision); Law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03285581476177582,"score_gpt":0.2494688006652572,"score_spread":0.21661298590348138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982786921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029914243,0.00022351519,0.00082304515,0.0007475578,0.00008023202,0.00005514142,0.0000029116748,0.000005598821,0.96814775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980178,0.00032020145,0.00087334047,0.000010983639,0.000029173676,1.15832615e-8,9.6275905e-8,7.4550655e-7,0.00074763654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997035,0.000048741604,0.00005915467,0.000026266885,0.00010398498,0.000058351223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964136,0.00003683888,0.00010707135,0.000052269395,0.00012312969,0.00003933846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026220953,0.00001732317,0.000038069058,0.000002493413,0.0010434105,0.000009900316,0.00015274793,0.00001957612,0.00059227785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014169277,0.000014648737,0.000038291724,0.00001036743,0.00028256542,0.00019855097,0.000017557746,0.00003586694,0.0000023028397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009541095,0.000014221257,0.00028277637,5.319577e-7,0.000009925134,6.65699e-7,0.011337775,7.969788e-7,0.00006898172,0.9862513,0.00061526493,0.0014082511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026815984,0.000046990735,0.009585188,0.000010563629,0.000029139766,0.0000028983015,0.05817419,0.000014719707,0.00033132758,0.015096626,0.9163818,0.000058394835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1684138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4350659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97115463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055387824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062594074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8371238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982885878","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.909","title":"INVESTING IN DEMOCRACY? POLITICAL PROCESS AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Doctrine; Democracy; Politics; Law and economics; Foreign direct investment; Political science; Economics; Jurisprudence; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.011479221014135078,"score_gpt":0.22215176281388316,"score_spread":0.2106725417997481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982885878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15871109,0.0000125208435,0.0000443831,0.0022214507,0.0002961505,0.000055401946,0.0000014792763,0.000014288923,0.83864325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98548514,0.000004095373,0.0008151489,0.013187378,0.00035226037,9.259303e-8,0.000005728185,0.000005125252,0.00014505966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993792,0.0000075034045,0.00015426669,0.00011079516,0.00019700637,0.00015118405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999563,0.000016924389,0.00014335192,0.000051386673,0.00018778173,0.000037591795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019196309,0.00007919269,0.00009451909,0.000048958293,0.00022973272,0.00010923247,0.00021372228,0.00004604938,0.00086037465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003519889,0.00008382003,0.000035516907,0.000025913452,0.00020631509,0.002072375,0.000081997314,0.00019135131,0.000009843223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024109146,0.00006142157,0.0035415976,0.000012240551,0.000014810078,0.000014297981,0.00009450847,0.000006681647,0.00041867333,0.99558455,0.00017260412,0.00005449857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004537674,0.00006167926,0.025359618,0.00020816784,0.00007891036,0.00017084506,0.005309402,0.015436376,0.00044341077,0.47445995,0.47331554,0.0006184536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021323614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08530895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8384982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077421515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002232845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984436990","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.343","title":"A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE STATE'S FORENSIC SCIENCE AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Political science; Federal Rules of Evidence; Admissible evidence; Law; Scientific evidence; Criminal justice; Contemplation; Adversary; Empirical evidence; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.0980487035760128,"score_gpt":0.36246655556734136,"score_spread":0.26441785199132856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984436990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92998034,0.00053062366,0.0008015687,0.008191578,0.00040665496,0.00059417594,0.000007624667,0.000009603801,0.059477843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975611,0.00012136906,0.0014000868,0.00060351787,0.00004970824,2.160313e-7,4.4960526e-8,0.0000022193963,0.00026175543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997702,0.0006680569,0.00026052422,0.00015984675,0.0009636573,0.000245922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974045,0.00082750974,0.00028107018,0.00034738643,0.00068364944,0.00045585303],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006019539,0.000066876346,0.0001864755,0.00001225672,0.0011930584,0.000005078161,0.00086108735,0.00007331469,0.0017184824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068629407,0.000037084264,0.00005003215,0.00008401842,0.0017357141,0.00046304238,0.0004558508,0.00051454717,0.0000040858426],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003040771,0.001226891,0.123358645,0.0008697451,0.00019514277,0.000027264674,0.70010227,0.000004119816,0.0005047022,0.09387325,0.026682353,0.05011483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022626556,0.0009893606,0.5368575,0.002107907,0.00022778765,0.00007593202,0.33304766,0.0006057374,0.00031708516,0.0035333373,0.11965943,0.00031559856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06089555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04611289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41349888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019034535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009321257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985312042","doi":"10.3138/utlj.041813","title":"REFLECTIONS ON THE STATE AS FIDUCIARY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Statutory interpretation; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.0305442363649234,"score_gpt":0.30412674739813045,"score_spread":0.2735825110332071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985312042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049664225,0.000036868056,0.0001208994,0.010280865,0.000073813,0.000092087685,0.0000029880584,0.000012211926,0.93971604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98673046,0.00025970663,0.00024277353,0.00027317135,0.00008708415,1.2593664e-7,2.269455e-7,0.000001856042,0.012404576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999564,0.000079984406,0.00004828447,0.000049645798,0.00015393512,0.000104141385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960804,0.00005975415,0.00006509427,0.000084099294,0.00010329732,0.0000797228],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019162506,0.000029825456,0.00004124614,0.0000054822303,0.0018699118,0.000044906898,0.00024473786,0.000021789572,0.0059940484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000154201,0.00002407085,0.000052419677,0.000025624553,0.00017370458,0.00031201175,0.000025615087,0.000102942286,0.00014655148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059468425,0.00004172927,0.000024001758,4.7673524e-7,0.00001924816,0.0000015212789,0.013681999,0.000022422068,0.00013640689,0.969867,0.014029917,0.002169339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008159561,0.000034275283,0.0012365412,0.0000067290134,0.000006817438,0.0000018487242,0.025068812,0.000007817072,0.000026127034,0.015848594,0.95763797,0.000042870717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43152466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29608467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9540184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017604504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069350404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985582839","doi":"10.3138/utlj.041813-02ra","title":"Normative jurisprudence and legal realism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Normative; Legal formalism; Legal positivism; Law; Critical legal studies; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Realism; Sociology; Legal history; Legal research; Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.009558701956465807,"score_gpt":0.16184893777700615,"score_spread":0.15229023582054035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985582839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11858142,0.006384839,0.0015553386,0.0019456748,0.0002053617,0.000074839656,0.000047189973,0.000010097351,0.87119526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968386,0.00096787635,0.0007617848,0.000077486795,0.000037251833,5.5605994e-8,5.041763e-7,0.0000013681565,0.0013150694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969226,0.00000617358,0.000113702,0.000074091404,0.000026069856,0.0000876784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969214,0.000012327991,0.0001370747,0.00004402989,0.00005520111,0.00005922091],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000081815546,0.00004753476,0.00013219554,0.000012321176,0.00032268345,0.000031900756,0.00010283938,0.000025466208,0.0010871692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000068295744,0.000051956315,0.000043626762,0.000011606754,0.00018192337,0.0009638107,0.000056665274,0.00006652186,0.00006701415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071517966,0.0000168439,0.0024618201,0.000004092252,0.000046415127,0.000007604328,0.0007301463,0.0000028566262,0.000006709457,0.99375606,0.0023170218,0.0006432985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092332036,0.000119163626,0.11998918,0.000032695414,0.000014360679,0.00011286392,0.0030724006,0.00016000084,0.000018506194,0.038932852,0.8363804,0.00024422756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14328384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009470229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009799358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009435969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987359688","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0014","title":"The Logic of the Rule of Law: Lessons from Willis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; CLARITY; Rule of law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03158620901448495,"score_gpt":0.28454818479866695,"score_spread":0.252961975784182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987359688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3004466,0.0046970127,0.00015612281,0.03978611,0.00050834886,0.00013721803,0.000056803285,0.000011552362,0.65420026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754024,0.00092036044,0.00041024515,0.000058687303,0.00009705049,8.897258e-9,1.4897303e-7,0.0000014356227,0.00097181665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992647,0.00013635124,0.00010847927,0.00005588968,0.00031307607,0.000121492485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928886,0.00016575631,0.00022253733,0.00012878006,0.00013909879,0.000054943786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038850028,0.00004138586,0.0001065578,0.0000031836578,0.0011405929,0.000014986683,0.00063273904,0.000042962405,0.00060771545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032774347,0.000028056287,0.00013298588,0.000018955561,0.000910809,0.00033574348,0.00007319215,0.00008699637,0.000002145765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000704158,0.000064476226,0.0006418964,0.0000039943225,0.00004801931,0.0000024750327,0.02592904,0.00005225708,0.00057519635,0.9640676,0.0024451353,0.00609949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023103757,0.000039427967,0.0060793213,0.00007126508,0.00007714485,0.000001978324,0.02851801,0.00001036192,0.000562051,0.006226261,0.9581196,0.00006354214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4027876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7151228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95784134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013660415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007420384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87726337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988010735","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0063","title":"The evidentiary burden for overturning government's choice of regulatory instrument: The case of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Advertising; Direct-to-consumer advertising; Medical prescription; Business; Public economics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.10390471592628747,"score_gpt":0.4148161472062495,"score_spread":0.310911431279962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988010735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99012816,0.001627943,0.000043505657,0.0009660109,0.0008906186,0.00036338912,0.00012678548,0.000005934708,0.0058476287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880683,0.0003946268,0.00015661739,0.000111884336,0.00014484787,4.9489256e-7,0.0000010401891,0.000007161721,0.00037647953],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987011,0.0003579865,0.00036263117,0.00012023786,0.00022268514,0.00023534131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979385,0.0008763411,0.00054495106,0.00018864876,0.00025384704,0.00019772064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012538225,0.000109145745,0.00023411255,0.000014703688,0.00079369644,0.0000078424955,0.000392708,0.00021753761,0.00040790666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014634554,0.000086692926,0.00016658641,0.000039557584,0.00048740226,0.00031122763,0.00012206238,0.00073152373,4.606286e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009355072,0.00081470615,0.022760931,0.0011554917,0.0027880508,0.00013041479,0.027095957,0.0009836961,0.6288691,0.036393598,0.012461508,0.25719148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056140106,0.0005656324,0.012432594,0.00040925218,0.0016271465,0.00032165615,0.021984126,0.003971249,0.19758917,0.00040847913,0.754702,0.00037468204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006069853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077160965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7422405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014483494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008404951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91758424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988984160","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1123","title":"THE LAW AND POLITICS OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Commonwealth; Politics; Political science; Mainstream; Realism; Private law; Legal realism; Comparative law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01074838589350766,"score_gpt":0.2397695653175655,"score_spread":0.22902117942405784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988984160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06546656,0.00060762255,0.00015184846,0.0049047046,0.00006636643,0.00011100662,0.000005973728,0.000005751391,0.9286802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997069,0.00061271735,0.00037624393,0.00004913931,0.0000512584,3.1700715e-8,1.2188566e-7,9.690963e-7,0.0018404922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964964,0.00003727165,0.000059378064,0.000033358694,0.00012538483,0.00009493397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961966,0.00004959,0.000078926925,0.000057443587,0.00011167147,0.00008270463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001520799,0.000023921571,0.000047899593,0.000002358775,0.0013384151,0.000028548813,0.00016552587,0.000021399326,0.00030018762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005147279,0.000019491132,0.0000293357,0.000010182334,0.00045912992,0.00025744215,0.000039981023,0.00004355201,0.000002644481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012402372,0.00001302031,0.000107088774,0.000001228247,0.000009755493,2.2532147e-7,0.003342591,8.9486036e-7,0.000043945958,0.9952751,0.0006842748,0.0005206496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014083038,0.000024109722,0.0018595618,0.0000058740325,0.000014974173,0.0000011957097,0.030398088,0.000010302305,0.000024114872,0.008128422,0.95935905,0.00003350694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3656249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18603668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009056185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034376382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989387975","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.579","title":"THE ABIDING PRESENCE OF CONSCIENCE: CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGAINST THE LAW AND THE MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL IMAGINATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Criminal law; Conscience; Political science; Constitutional law; Proportionality (law); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Public law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.023906472535384266,"score_gpt":0.2577655830646704,"score_spread":0.23385911052928612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989387975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066221566,0.0011932295,0.0044937786,0.0015541457,0.00027150064,0.000105370775,0.0000146763105,0.0000053464405,0.98573977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817705,0.000768511,0.00047250127,0.00020266524,0.00006614358,7.700695e-8,2.2810386e-7,8.1583636e-7,0.0003119923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990806,0.00024816196,0.0001072426,0.00006516547,0.00035084572,0.00014795725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987437,0.00058594637,0.0001901476,0.00008091367,0.00033243708,0.00006685984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010678752,0.000048127557,0.00007971001,0.000005332529,0.0041268948,0.000039290484,0.0004206248,0.000024285044,0.00007220504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013842578,0.000028643215,0.000053596563,0.000026830225,0.027680226,0.000427167,0.00006052674,0.00011226321,5.8345285e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053711112,0.000010881475,0.00005717683,0.00000306102,0.000016020413,0.000002262255,0.014564159,0.000017957631,0.000017765891,0.98474085,0.00011929655,0.00039683812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022238842,0.00010925944,0.0013056037,0.00012948655,0.00082429685,0.0001421723,0.40571392,0.0017835423,0.00011911089,0.08062703,0.5066995,0.00032220833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055254284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026263239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009346714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056677166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990719429","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0013","title":"Frank Iacobucci and the University of Toronto","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Friendship; Character (mathematics); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Social science; Literature","score_opus":0.01291416203427385,"score_gpt":0.27374297899915906,"score_spread":0.2608288169648852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990719429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02707504,0.0013402307,0.0016432179,0.0077227587,0.00032614736,0.00009351633,0.0000043137443,0.0000103221855,0.9617845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388844,0.0016744614,0.0013136037,0.00008641843,0.000084294625,2.1459194e-9,4.617713e-7,0.000001672987,0.0029506572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937445,0.00015397092,0.000088025496,0.00005881304,0.00021082108,0.00011392951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991068,0.00023033883,0.00020910171,0.00008005458,0.00028253585,0.000091159614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013618765,0.000039896582,0.000096823154,0.00000803355,0.0012913108,0.000021541693,0.00023773356,0.000046792957,0.0053744935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074785225,0.00003867232,0.000057846737,0.000036349364,0.0007048259,0.0011315997,0.000032289958,0.00014557573,0.000002714128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033658344,0.000076379976,0.00085826503,0.000004823097,0.00007059526,0.000007660074,0.13134687,0.0000017525891,0.00004644446,0.85367906,0.007388357,0.0061832177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079816143,0.000021317159,0.007359568,0.000008757385,0.00003788901,0.0000048637726,0.19433637,0.000004421366,0.0000064129636,0.0003190079,0.7970575,0.00004573301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6787529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.810642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9668134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002715873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021898224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991144808","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0029","title":"John Willis and the Challenges for Public Law Scholarship in a Neoliberal Globalizing World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; State (computer science); Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Accountability; Political science; Democracy; Corporate governance; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Politics; History; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.043644719354182224,"score_gpt":0.26449566462811497,"score_spread":0.22085094527393273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991144808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019845625,0.02734086,0.000055131448,0.05460934,0.00015360292,0.00018165864,0.000007092227,0.00001398148,0.8977927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945957,0.004215593,0.00045683456,0.00029483208,0.00024043981,1.4420806e-7,1.5297873e-7,0.0000013111355,0.00019498578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936104,0.00012360906,0.00008127109,0.00007423965,0.00018180601,0.00017806138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996023,0.000112811256,0.00007057859,0.000034444536,0.00010703263,0.00007282596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007667248,0.000049261205,0.00012344657,0.000013645311,0.0015421577,0.00005303414,0.0001928957,0.00003216808,0.000070008784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041622236,0.000041662108,0.00006617989,0.000032276606,0.0010608555,0.00080378127,0.00005105299,0.00009033466,7.953779e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007408837,0.000018095232,0.0004958205,0.0000014407273,0.000028016224,0.0000018180259,0.0066493973,0.000002484149,5.953607e-7,0.9857661,0.000111485264,0.006850633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015985989,0.000019487607,0.004603043,0.0000442385,0.000024416302,0.0000041820626,0.017004276,0.000007791964,8.5596105e-7,0.07963005,0.896981,0.00008207791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1576394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95920247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026364654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064124906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992484021","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2637","title":"The fault of trespass","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Duty; Tort; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Liability; Law; Contributory negligence; Normative; Possession (linguistics); Strict liability; Business; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009435617330577219,"score_gpt":0.24321257248906838,"score_spread":0.23377695515849117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992484021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025445813,0.00017264632,0.001617548,0.0034068886,0.000096548065,0.00004776549,0.0000036901024,0.0000070320743,0.96920204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967926,0.00028217654,0.00036382282,0.000014665629,0.00007657204,1.0905666e-8,1.07472125e-7,0.000001008113,0.0024690365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959856,0.00007820572,0.000057764275,0.00003239516,0.00015270968,0.00008034511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957794,0.000082762774,0.000107653046,0.00007307738,0.00010201685,0.0000565666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038971065,0.000021210904,0.00005092331,0.0000027943759,0.0011188997,0.000015196163,0.00029827605,0.000023049293,0.00024140778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023716626,0.000017183445,0.00005596339,0.000014620754,0.0002755607,0.00013893464,0.000026698795,0.000046590867,0.000002797987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010742971,0.000015948472,0.00016424473,8.9853546e-7,0.000011196366,2.5727292e-7,0.0036375334,0.000012447209,0.000080804755,0.9840508,0.0016181873,0.010396932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012545293,0.00001838067,0.0013750497,0.000004281937,0.000008747506,4.439677e-7,0.008405568,0.00003249227,0.00002708821,0.0014656623,0.9885147,0.000022102535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0971511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41099766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006810532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037519563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90886104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993234971","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0009","title":"Private Law and Kantian Right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Normative; Categorical imperative; Law; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Autonomy; Kantian ethics; Philosophy; Public law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01993033948230251,"score_gpt":0.18697039109619312,"score_spread":0.16704005161389063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993234971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22377689,0.00021549127,0.0002283855,0.00009168832,0.00023378983,0.000046839246,0.000007585931,0.00002117713,0.77537817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785244,0.00024539643,0.0010924236,0.0001517211,0.000029800034,5.3066564e-9,9.400273e-8,0.0000033247625,0.0006247804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999519,0.00004596957,0.000069568014,0.00011335315,0.00011705363,0.00013506718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967057,0.000012811592,0.0000829998,0.00009407163,0.000021594074,0.000117980075],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006669765,0.00006121646,0.00009048431,0.000008986266,0.0004320698,0.000013043131,0.00023558922,0.000032616972,0.0022764634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000063983075,0.0000568416,0.000047306497,0.00001401906,0.00028530974,0.0005704109,0.000073442134,0.000084988096,0.00001121988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008696529,0.00010990811,0.0005762779,0.000011846387,0.000014425736,0.00046467935,0.002803305,5.048108e-7,0.03822205,0.9557953,0.0005651381,0.0013496291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030040052,0.00075077405,0.01933178,0.00014545894,0.00012036043,0.0011002085,0.0014384054,0.00011237667,0.16681816,0.020993713,0.78552777,0.0006570105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011296063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01609801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030869338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000080192785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993751475","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0012","title":"If Philosophical Legal Ethics is the Answer, What is the Question?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Closed-ended question; Political science","score_opus":0.03466443420024338,"score_gpt":0.35657622478657486,"score_spread":0.32191179058633146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993751475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053721596,0.00018277254,0.00010588348,0.82789695,0.0016937746,0.00007548088,0.0000043099326,0.000011718794,0.16465694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98267025,0.0015301756,0.0005553487,0.009864647,0.0010586751,8.070443e-8,8.1929596e-7,0.000003734774,0.004316289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988249,0.00038140596,0.00010825526,0.000083544815,0.00046509455,0.00013680974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984832,0.0004782936,0.00018404148,0.00017898732,0.0005797988,0.00009570175],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019794442,0.00005625309,0.00006624916,0.000011325754,0.0039493367,0.00042405335,0.00055444695,0.00014626894,0.0068360073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002816588,0.00004030677,0.00008644759,0.00008029445,0.0008481094,0.0029342985,0.000037178546,0.0016107996,0.000027210996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013209583,0.000045955796,0.00009804167,0.0000010004261,0.000024296705,0.0000018467038,0.0772221,6.8174296e-7,0.00002396141,0.90290445,0.018027838,0.0016365955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010693753,0.000015581223,0.00058783044,0.000010198667,0.000029637968,0.000011613118,0.06461013,0.000009207206,0.000010621332,0.011305857,0.9232509,0.000051479947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16658121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26161847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011113247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075197546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993791420","doi":"10.2307/825930","title":"Redressing Historic Injustice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.008626619001954255,"score_gpt":0.15816022856717196,"score_spread":0.14953360956521772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993791420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067713626,0.0021556437,0.0009908254,0.00021374863,0.0002904465,0.000042992106,0.0000025144443,0.000017599812,0.9285726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820035,0.00058486674,0.0030357132,0.00010251795,0.000049820304,1.3412345e-8,3.4289076e-7,0.0000054560037,0.014217745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994395,0.000033107564,0.0000736356,0.00010106217,0.00022946115,0.00012327461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965507,0.000011095036,0.00012454216,0.00008712334,0.0000034500051,0.000118749216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000054596334,0.00006349791,0.00008994446,0.000005739433,0.0004291725,0.0000023020616,0.00020225643,0.00003062779,0.030411288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000021128994,0.00006568677,0.000069207956,0.000018505812,0.0010881978,0.0003598914,0.000086589884,0.0000910201,0.00019242286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035414347,0.0018827305,0.009587677,0.000040574025,0.00019569728,0.0010761222,0.061271027,0.0046950267,0.025384877,0.0033004703,0.69559467,0.19661698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034308794,0.00011286267,0.0050614225,0.000014613468,0.000039667477,0.00012889579,0.0053343982,0.0002661317,0.00002310494,0.000042568037,0.988486,0.00014726947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012685571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036921587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91435486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013257383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020276825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99388903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994050578","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0025","title":"'This New Democracy.. . ': Justice Iacobucci and Canada's Rights Revolution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Law; Democracy; Supreme court; Constitutionalism; Economic Justice; Political science; Dissenting opinion; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009781214823715448,"score_gpt":0.22387862478239262,"score_spread":0.21409740995867718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994050578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028036064,0.002710282,0.0013809009,0.002814807,0.00060714333,0.00005866537,0.0000051323595,0.000012508311,0.9643745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948677,0.0007588933,0.0009283869,0.000080095604,0.00039055655,2.8792633e-9,3.521096e-7,0.0000010466982,0.0029730098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999359,0.000037040478,0.000080328085,0.00006894464,0.00028538497,0.00016928135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994826,0.000060591385,0.00008732829,0.000029399831,0.00014206792,0.00019801324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030072586,0.000046807003,0.00009151227,0.000008679679,0.0028168678,0.000010802457,0.000113117,0.000040695784,0.00074655644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030384812,0.00004937907,0.00003097002,0.000022356055,0.00031956605,0.00027418806,0.000029778068,0.00007561158,0.0000021875821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009796461,0.000024727382,0.0024494864,0.000004376006,0.000071858965,0.000097009266,0.004730374,0.0000028969525,0.000024734882,0.92483914,0.063588835,0.004068585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003096795,0.000025352425,0.013181183,0.000028108416,0.00009372104,0.0000141460205,0.008829366,0.0000018282298,0.0000073843858,0.0076839174,0.9697315,0.000093808994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99849606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99977547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96683156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006602752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047511345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994274195","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.341","title":"PATH DEPENDENCE, DEVELOPMENT, AND THE DYNAMICS OF INSTITUTIONAL REFORM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Path dependence; Perspective (graphical); Dysfunctional family; Property rights; Path (computing); Development (topology); Law and economics; Political science; Property (philosophy); Dynamics (music); Institutional change; Economic system; Sociology; Positive economics; Political economy; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Public administration; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.007872377906210547,"score_gpt":0.21713897372139437,"score_spread":0.20926659581518384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994274195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095795594,0.00019812642,0.0010389733,0.0021221072,0.00014252767,0.000054443255,0.0000032296955,0.0000053800927,0.9006396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952351,0.00030605923,0.0029404815,0.000040737526,0.000027908929,8.655594e-9,0.0000015700352,5.646385e-7,0.0014476043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994975,0.000031843123,0.00008687656,0.000039868748,0.0002705931,0.00007337087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967194,0.000017718816,0.00010916867,0.000023558176,0.00013935393,0.00003826626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041836253,0.00003258762,0.00006855162,0.000011750428,0.00075676397,0.000013084275,0.00019133708,0.000028830691,0.00018506445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001264292,0.000025759715,0.000030721872,0.000017512626,0.00035699774,0.00035501993,0.00002251752,0.00005513566,8.1996404e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059967864,0.000013968971,0.00032205402,0.0000011975934,0.000016819387,0.0000041793273,0.0061451467,0.0000014331084,0.0000030144379,0.9864607,0.000045455454,0.0069260844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010030278,0.00024089766,0.28502363,0.00050466246,0.00011679865,0.0001256723,0.1282251,0.0009539454,0.00025437592,0.09282373,0.48098627,0.0007146443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015172713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13718642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89943945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004281705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019626331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99138534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995286705","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0425","title":"Republicanism and the division of powers in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Normative; Law and economics; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Politics; Multinational corporation; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Constitution; Lawmaking; Legislature","score_opus":0.005666595961203131,"score_gpt":0.19097371737783328,"score_spread":0.18530712141663014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995286705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30569327,0.0009266027,0.00012195303,0.004222271,0.00017983996,0.000052754305,0.0000029106543,0.0000019789506,0.6887984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994595,0.00039600907,0.000034732217,0.000043629374,0.000017019216,5.221277e-9,5.006499e-8,3.2702954e-7,0.00004872978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959284,0.000091306974,0.000053762673,0.000031179356,0.00016935947,0.00006156079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997348,0.00008004219,0.00006685919,0.000023789391,0.00006095945,0.000033551947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003940128,0.000019782306,0.00007845114,0.0000042399465,0.00044511587,0.0000043541545,0.000102783844,0.000010945514,0.000106795465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049324706,0.000015408874,0.000019548957,0.000015684534,0.000560127,0.000104544604,0.000032354812,0.00003750391,6.8831305e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002831416,0.000005379304,0.0105254585,7.88578e-7,0.000011582512,0.0000016493876,0.0038615686,0.0000055646424,0.000002820478,0.9825347,0.00029021007,0.0027319724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026474327,0.00006485458,0.35462227,0.00009189389,0.000036782032,0.000003898365,0.15021072,0.00005323676,0.000007777589,0.028554432,0.46356857,0.00013811831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95398027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021305456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025166976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34235165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997483733","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.421","title":"DEMOCRACY, COMMUNITY, AND FEDERALISM IN ELECTORAL APPORTIONMENT CASES: THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AND AUSTRALIA IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Democracy; Individualism; Federalism; Apportionment; Political science; Jurisprudence; Separation of powers; Legislature; State (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05433165714937223,"score_gpt":0.29791275718114807,"score_spread":0.24358110003177585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997483733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98923045,0.00014036354,0.0000135933105,0.0011796065,0.000032591306,0.00006573334,0.000021762775,0.0000017842776,0.009314101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990673,0.00031799637,0.000068942616,0.00012179785,0.000012605583,3.7211645e-8,0.0000035117175,8.95004e-7,0.00040693438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999139,0.0004238172,0.00008583139,0.00004844867,0.00016028053,0.0001426318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995311,0.00016233369,0.00007983132,0.00003720344,0.000093199844,0.00009633855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023178058,0.00005150843,0.00011168292,0.000017242046,0.0015600724,0.000013510329,0.00010259663,0.00002380947,0.00009260444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013996832,0.000049034952,0.000013099274,0.000043844033,0.0012492846,0.00017308141,0.00003302354,0.00021493368,1.0313515e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088786546,0.00009654332,0.14726071,0.0000034194532,0.00004521269,0.00032864526,0.106798194,0.00027914162,0.000002878187,0.74238116,0.0026998913,0.000015418724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085596147,0.000120131415,0.36496288,0.000034748697,0.000021026031,0.00020860782,0.54525703,0.00005141592,0.000002160607,0.0011855809,0.087132305,0.00016816302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74119556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001106742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007040147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997740180","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0006","title":"Can the Law Do Without the Reasonable Person?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Honor; Causation; Jurisprudence; Philosophy of law; Common law; Positivism; Sociology; Comparative law; Adjudication; Criminal law; Reasonable person; Political science; Law and economics; Liability","score_opus":0.01632376486803916,"score_gpt":0.24679325122369217,"score_spread":0.230469486355653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997740180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015661031,0.00048602646,0.00006400158,0.05166796,0.000058734895,0.00010723951,0.000007935578,0.000013325944,0.93193376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99133795,0.00021519444,0.0003797368,0.00032158234,0.0003027213,7.4338324e-8,2.4784765e-7,0.0000024366657,0.0074400674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939716,0.000100932695,0.000050125047,0.00006392759,0.00023441986,0.00015344216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995625,0.000042318505,0.000088201756,0.00013152404,0.000090608024,0.000084863175],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045625368,0.000042476742,0.000060943497,0.0000024685846,0.003433843,0.0000772598,0.0005195484,0.00003165462,0.0011600823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007353608,0.000027882908,0.00007294192,0.000024444327,0.0004996521,0.0002883711,0.000037583373,0.00013245924,0.000011200223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007370361,0.000019083258,0.00020739473,4.877601e-7,0.000017813292,9.38358e-7,0.027775992,0.000025901652,0.000012337677,0.9661131,0.0042240885,0.0015955267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012950765,0.000009366764,0.0006301358,0.00000536954,0.000022640153,0.0000044825615,0.07027014,0.00002601074,0.0000057816383,0.0005234631,0.9283333,0.000039810202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41046366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8384929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9756769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026969847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089265355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998001869","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0002","title":"Constitutional cosiness and legislative activism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Political science; Charter; Nothing; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012407419558927458,"score_gpt":0.2437157712267815,"score_spread":0.23130835166785405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998001869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012397412,0.0011470265,0.00069399754,0.0030008974,0.00014622878,0.000049210434,0.000008869688,0.000013907531,0.98254246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939239,0.001174136,0.0017072769,0.000088235465,0.0002498454,1.1893586e-8,5.962762e-7,8.3064776e-7,0.0028551547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995514,0.000061027786,0.000044427925,0.00005812336,0.0001834443,0.00010155728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965256,0.000029328767,0.00007103161,0.000028068742,0.00012809246,0.000090940324],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018360694,0.000039717426,0.00007472876,9.885238e-7,0.0013425244,0.00002407718,0.000108905486,0.00006589535,0.001243881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009821402,0.0000402997,0.000049259477,0.0000151543145,0.0016055285,0.0008330704,0.000021435757,0.000092650684,0.0000027869758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020681739,0.0000342093,0.00023465708,0.0000015299514,0.000037690632,0.0000047842213,0.040549997,0.0000108361855,0.00004804091,0.9511082,0.003747659,0.0042016804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036238818,0.000012673016,0.0006005322,0.000014321411,0.000018061193,0.000011174195,0.027214708,0.0000061938144,0.000015021735,0.0006917524,0.9709957,0.000057467798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107964305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091168575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021371427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082162915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998006502","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0016","title":"The Puzzle of Martial Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Martial law; Proclamation; Comparative law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.009613245002529722,"score_gpt":0.24832261895429203,"score_spread":0.2387093739517623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998006502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016312178,0.00023627513,0.0000814977,0.0008415616,0.0001325303,0.000026209276,0.0000028115949,0.000005582236,0.9823614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982715,0.00018913604,0.00012721129,0.000102318554,0.000095090756,2.745874e-9,1.06547475e-7,7.220115e-7,0.0012138801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936515,0.0001808303,0.00007573824,0.000040835403,0.00016380905,0.00017364095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995659,0.00010872928,0.00007858065,0.000068932764,0.0000794348,0.00009845201],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048199363,0.000031965654,0.000086251464,0.0000030918673,0.001411127,0.000009607673,0.00026342666,0.00006042747,0.00088693877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033437427,0.000026827036,0.000085424,0.00001167502,0.0009735769,0.00022615177,0.000018715187,0.00008746472,0.000003623435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056875295,0.000024744899,0.000032429878,3.924777e-7,0.000012909583,0.0000052776204,0.0009957015,0.0000011040136,0.000013212449,0.99768543,0.00019299363,0.0009789059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005189776,0.00016419719,0.0039008541,0.0000137439865,0.0000352941,0.000006612178,0.011604815,0.0000057652796,0.0002008593,0.62786007,0.35560858,0.00008021453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0247867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0633004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98195934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009179282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045953995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001503077","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2005","title":"Authority, justice, and public law: A unified theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Duty; Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020331275350106637,"score_gpt":0.24490026477474316,"score_spread":0.22456898942463652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001503077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010423507,0.00076709944,0.0012770701,0.0017253938,0.00025437094,0.000034444296,0.0000030954145,0.000016732798,0.9854983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833953,0.0005739569,0.0002932981,0.00011661222,0.00021478416,1.4615328e-8,2.6815943e-7,0.0000012193473,0.0004603319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930257,0.000206339,0.000061080216,0.00007116949,0.00020815493,0.00015070448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994902,0.000105128,0.00007022693,0.000039397604,0.00015432527,0.00014072577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006752381,0.000045948032,0.00010379196,0.00000898804,0.0025596241,0.00004074991,0.00016566896,0.000046996985,0.00038113506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007600961,0.00004705261,0.000044124467,0.000021632653,0.0011742023,0.00041080423,0.00006863649,0.00008000593,0.000004266124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020087322,0.000021270434,0.00027830544,0.0000027799958,0.000027985672,0.000003599527,0.002419415,3.9677272e-7,0.000007052108,0.99358374,0.00034552888,0.0032898218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041939545,0.000060546336,0.0030037456,0.000021034484,0.00013058688,0.0000068001223,0.041220393,0.0000062885088,0.0000018503911,0.24731098,0.70770895,0.00010939648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16639698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.498244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010769901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006976306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003674295","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.39","title":"FEDERAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: A LOOK AT PATRONAGE IN FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS SINCE 1988","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Judicial review; Corporate governance; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.01858306994758652,"score_gpt":0.2362304961876446,"score_spread":0.2176474262400581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003674295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4974596,0.0011012526,0.00015180184,0.0009964547,0.00043659838,0.00019152169,0.000017077587,0.000026408105,0.49961928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970781,0.000769328,0.00032386856,0.00012515568,0.00024210777,1.7520651e-7,0.0000025622471,0.0000037857205,0.0014548982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858147,0.00016745579,0.00018785243,0.00017086658,0.0005301698,0.00036217453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945724,0.00003815822,0.00016278235,0.000063314925,0.00011704348,0.00016144282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027272792,0.00011908184,0.00024628546,0.000026362697,0.004024865,0.000024274863,0.0002703305,0.00007863371,0.0008727435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023181263,0.00013272335,0.0001473461,0.000050821218,0.0010459372,0.000591329,0.0001490428,0.00014303466,0.00003569794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022483293,0.0018575379,0.2802135,0.00002286052,0.0007595972,0.0035587181,0.096619114,0.00010371346,0.00028146367,0.5848999,0.02205377,0.007381446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011728809,0.00096236385,0.29956692,0.00038233763,0.000119734104,0.0003305363,0.112677276,0.000030777723,0.00007994297,0.020651864,0.5520452,0.0014241961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34168532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6248694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5642481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016699127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002523508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004751260","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2505","title":"The role of reparative justice in responding to the legacy of Indian Residential Schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Settlement (finance); Wrongdoing; Plaintiff; Commission; Political science; Order (exchange); Compensation (psychology); Law; Payment; Value (mathematics); Business; Finance; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010039394971988051,"score_gpt":0.26191666166364763,"score_spread":0.2518772666916596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004751260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38467318,0.0012647664,0.00012632113,0.0040637124,0.00034297226,0.00015952383,0.000005667105,0.000004221438,0.6093596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993153,0.00022364935,0.00008669146,0.000017296554,0.00013816646,4.540634e-8,6.719695e-8,7.850566e-7,0.00021796783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991514,0.00027959084,0.00012173728,0.000052660824,0.00028241365,0.00011218104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993495,0.00020235893,0.00016222254,0.00006124151,0.00018004455,0.00004465805],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010769399,0.00003427731,0.00010174562,0.000027926048,0.0013848185,0.000020152098,0.0003290422,0.000026250988,0.000045753513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031902824,0.000025141919,0.00005338973,0.00010267226,0.00044865476,0.00029806976,0.00005698833,0.000092867835,0.000001926517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002535067,0.000016938477,0.0018323766,0.000001674047,0.00003463208,0.000002561911,0.034953903,0.00007585966,0.00018475368,0.95986104,0.00050380535,0.0022789557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043014617,0.00015528333,0.029340513,0.00014320425,0.00007197529,0.000002401686,0.5321781,0.000008204067,0.00036533386,0.02095195,0.41626063,0.00009223299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27125224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6870374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93890905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014873946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013991588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006616143","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.tomlins","title":"ANIMALS ACCURS’D: <i>FERAE NATURAE</i> AND THE LAW OF PROPERTY IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY NORTH AMERICA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Property (philosophy); Order (exchange); Settlement (finance); Sociology; Property law; Political science; Property rights; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009206363595720154,"score_gpt":0.2283009194454895,"score_spread":0.21909455584976933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006616143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72337073,0.003905415,0.0000028261813,0.0038418942,0.00023742921,0.00043700868,0.000014052657,0.000017908285,0.26817274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626386,0.002885803,0.00034760236,0.00011684934,0.000044077347,2.1030495e-7,7.1506673e-7,0.000003440738,0.00033745804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990421,0.00021908096,0.00016758632,0.00010584872,0.00026603078,0.00019934299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991864,0.00012020026,0.00024350837,0.00010163711,0.0002499291,0.00009830512],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021827537,0.00008047103,0.00020396031,0.000029476874,0.0007247956,0.000057167566,0.00039795996,0.000046230005,0.0014699618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036392055,0.000055682412,0.00011281783,0.00006908951,0.0016408468,0.0008810362,0.00009292931,0.0002153917,0.0000051144225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002631916,0.0012639168,0.06434523,0.00009937334,0.00096561306,0.00008340989,0.31809852,0.000121556244,0.0017018727,0.5444808,0.04924031,0.016967481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002841368,0.00034805693,0.08275451,0.00011397173,0.00011103255,0.000018781415,0.27769276,0.000055786615,0.000018765855,0.0008441303,0.63490313,0.0002977025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.600485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85168576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58566284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009701482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003343412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007174447","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2004","title":"Two logics of authority in modern law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Epistemology; Relation (database); Identification (biology); Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Public law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0313217026405304,"score_gpt":0.2253329696495683,"score_spread":0.19401126700903792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007174447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045788236,0.0002759037,0.00023314914,0.0005641539,0.00030825887,0.000044643897,0.00003127453,0.0000106543175,0.9527437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869275,0.00004284179,0.00027949756,0.00013058784,0.00029514128,1.3106939e-8,0.0000018642127,0.0000035843932,0.000553726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999307,0.000106375366,0.00016403035,0.00008508335,0.000173755,0.00016378751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952936,0.000061409,0.00010353471,0.000097901946,0.00009725129,0.00011056375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020921903,0.00007577387,0.00020800784,0.000013090372,0.00021341043,0.000016156466,0.00021007478,0.000040017618,0.0023266536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009756936,0.00007035044,0.00012116036,0.0000061806595,0.00041771424,0.00026942327,0.00005454702,0.00016076145,0.00000485454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060411017,0.00014131538,0.00008121672,0.000014902144,0.000018838742,0.0000065178933,0.0029431272,0.000014747276,0.00002014931,0.9958023,0.00008697739,0.00080950017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015139573,0.00026409695,0.00033082772,0.00008469582,0.000048293678,0.000008545197,0.0026498463,0.0005536448,0.000067666435,0.53534573,0.4589575,0.00017519083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03100783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09559418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9529045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007421347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009791444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009613640","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.499","title":"Electoral Fairness and the Law of Democracy: A Structural Rights Approach to Judicial Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Law; Deference; Fundamental rights; Gerrymandering; Redistricting; Law and economics; Judicial review; Human rights; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015573670904401118,"score_gpt":0.25021697575501783,"score_spread":0.2346433048506167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009613640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079061344,0.050368816,0.00045392636,0.00449815,0.0005571807,0.0005065494,0.00001647066,0.000017228576,0.8645203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799585,0.0011771852,0.00036896556,0.00017151482,0.00023715849,7.344939e-8,3.731221e-7,0.000001116338,0.000047771322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991934,0.00017516651,0.00010993489,0.000059797156,0.00028556728,0.0001761572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995117,0.000049378483,0.000121545985,0.000045234032,0.00015407067,0.00011806155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052184856,0.000059295424,0.00022153916,0.0000063317666,0.0018057559,0.000010070109,0.00020131226,0.000030594423,0.00012845412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024001261,0.000042100994,0.00008370117,0.000042190262,0.0013016535,0.00037661553,0.00006537471,0.00007639093,0.0000011470114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007290074,0.000017188255,0.00077918277,0.00001192951,0.00004808614,5.681126e-7,0.005046377,5.7397506e-7,0.0000039123083,0.9930567,0.0005466949,0.00041590162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004577926,0.00022865091,0.041691095,0.00111477,0.0012080101,0.00011604409,0.035270594,0.000014645589,0.000061649356,0.16325527,0.7516763,0.00078501255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.362905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21997476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9189345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010376791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049455477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009940061","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0035","title":"Who's Afraid of Canadian Legal History?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Legal culture; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Law; Legal realism; Focus (optics); Political science; Common law; Legal opinion; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Legal research; Comparative law; History; Black letter law; Private law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009835300970968729,"score_gpt":0.1836732424722006,"score_spread":0.17383794150123186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009940061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0097268345,0.0015560869,0.000043627642,0.0004036912,0.00055368943,0.0000319879,0.000011228364,0.000005096974,0.98766774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221807,0.0013097499,0.00061982614,0.00014469109,0.00031957575,6.514104e-9,0.0000011623047,0.00000688573,0.0754174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999331,0.000044888176,0.00009903109,0.000061469254,0.00023903672,0.00022454889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915576,0.000018523077,0.000124943,0.000072540235,0.00015802211,0.00047018548],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055188505,0.000037956434,0.00011393424,0.00027241698,0.0009219693,0.000021486556,0.0002770277,0.00007574042,0.009364885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020663072,0.000060408085,0.00010101837,0.000055521614,0.0007991489,0.0005029594,0.000010547135,0.000102967075,0.0000074019385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056123816,0.000037589863,0.00047407902,0.000011149329,0.00005519929,0.00029514605,0.056856915,0.0000033066121,0.00009981708,0.68401134,0.25118202,0.0069172983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016060258,0.00002419164,0.0026310468,0.000013592175,0.000016983508,0.0000051594234,0.011395608,3.6665637e-7,0.0000028844127,0.000045231634,0.9856453,0.00005905741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9124539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007526851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018502392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99628305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010507052","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.579","title":"THE FUTURE OF NATIONAL CITIZENSHIP: GOING, GOING, GONE?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.008006076081529371,"score_gpt":0.24516936515131676,"score_spread":0.2371632890697874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010507052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05558307,0.003936318,0.0007595305,0.004123169,0.0006505595,0.00013146465,0.000013412417,0.000023836674,0.93477863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904128,0.0023591786,0.000537992,0.00006846962,0.0005492698,1.58664e-8,0.000002514085,0.0000019048898,0.006067907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907434,0.00014128305,0.00013210849,0.00006397952,0.00046557534,0.00012273662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991074,0.000054387583,0.00023546816,0.000059364396,0.00047389028,0.00006949199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064539874,0.000052026506,0.00008880296,0.000014370806,0.0013897159,0.00003927062,0.00026797986,0.00006996796,0.00061039504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004893005,0.00004360192,0.00010412174,0.000036460646,0.00019995013,0.00038150838,0.000008490216,0.000103150924,0.000004272081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055061602,0.00003008392,0.00047984277,0.0000018122646,0.000027892958,0.0000012610275,0.019130338,0.000007706329,0.0001673345,0.9209125,0.051725954,0.007460231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035396285,0.00013369798,0.005798061,0.000029221137,0.000017348582,0.0000049118785,0.025904132,0.00005174577,0.000076030934,0.017832637,0.9497133,0.000084978165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043939576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3654215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93482965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028874984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001826844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010864096","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0018","title":"Culture and competitive resource regulation: A liberal economic alternative to sui generis Aboriginal rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024077932249131524,"score_gpt":0.20121362087113204,"score_spread":0.17713568862200052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010864096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43393108,0.00038780778,0.00052391185,0.00034926544,0.00048076836,0.00014796667,0.000009898631,0.000022011474,0.5641473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923156,0.00003063387,0.0008351583,0.00035580524,0.0014832679,5.984148e-8,0.000007554699,0.0000063211314,0.00496562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950844,0.000018629988,0.00009243654,0.00009948672,0.000107051885,0.0001739578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996536,0.000010507371,0.00012850485,0.0000601539,0.000101765225,0.000045461446],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013128313,0.00009526094,0.00013030184,0.000031238058,0.00048244165,0.00007132112,0.00015131374,0.000042516673,0.002183086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027840629,0.00008526112,0.000051325933,0.0000199349,0.00007006639,0.0015947561,0.00006852992,0.00009186679,0.00008564835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016282079,0.00019604423,0.008795569,0.000061218925,0.00036918488,0.000046746427,0.018728469,0.00045173735,0.0004276689,0.8871614,0.07959736,0.0025364293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004956279,0.00003515689,0.0041363193,0.000044232478,0.00004319126,0.000021986516,0.0012731573,0.00026038694,0.000099380704,0.0005384453,0.9929141,0.00013801875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022003362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013417444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014328721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008140746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012417400","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0005","title":"Methodology and Perspective in the Theory of Lawyers' Ethics: A Response to Professors Woolley and Markovits","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Adjudication; Sociology; Identity (music); Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09049720170802593,"score_gpt":0.4104518565846362,"score_spread":0.31995465487661023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012417400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77227587,0.00014206048,0.00019910054,0.120109156,0.00024247631,0.00016285671,0.0000042347306,0.0000036996069,0.106860526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338174,0.00009019727,0.005338085,0.00043063887,0.000032638385,9.1661704e-8,6.852895e-8,0.0000013572104,0.0007252035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695575,0.0026882244,0.00007338143,0.000064699656,0.00013869125,0.00007926436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965505,0.0029240027,0.000110874804,0.000062956475,0.00029831752,0.000053357628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009207737,0.0000325424,0.00008044163,0.000038825492,0.00055764813,0.00002362839,0.00015617609,0.00008445196,0.00035793873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033234507,0.000028395574,0.000017051862,0.00007447612,0.00048530698,0.00040533178,0.000028496166,0.00058805005,4.0248509e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043794417,0.00002467318,0.00038184394,0.0000015635253,0.000009280136,0.0000018030178,0.4111616,1.6231814e-7,0.00041219025,0.5869271,0.00016178613,0.0004800341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028659144,0.00006850032,0.02752557,0.000010827266,0.000017036737,0.000011913176,0.86069316,5.7234354e-7,0.000015224636,0.013065149,0.09826387,0.000041576594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11166347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49900344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57386196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006942763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040629922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89425206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012710559","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2775","title":"The mystery of privity: <i>Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada v Robinson</i> (1915)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.017733287137583733,"score_gpt":0.2270689261279302,"score_spread":0.20933563899034646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012710559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3896528,0.0013648053,0.00055130525,0.004624361,0.0004591501,0.00025723843,0.000069173366,0.000010950589,0.60301024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998166,0.00014622186,0.0002091743,0.000019728224,0.00004869662,2.9107676e-8,4.7018526e-7,0.0000019792087,0.0014076792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919397,0.00011138127,0.00013726787,0.00005446292,0.0003629436,0.00013996732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991059,0.000086414526,0.00026544748,0.00011651189,0.0002675759,0.00015818619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005822002,0.000043878335,0.00014122356,0.00000538493,0.000685024,0.000014637311,0.0004000588,0.000031073872,0.000076662676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026278389,0.00003734248,0.00006382494,0.000033763856,0.00036061782,0.00020646666,0.00005198946,0.00007439872,3.561355e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004033572,0.000310039,0.0068263817,0.000043601347,0.0003068171,0.000019308169,0.06041945,0.00045040372,0.0009594642,0.81221616,0.11058275,0.007462279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005054373,0.000034912606,0.0019278151,0.00002005725,0.00002511892,0.0000023165885,0.021728216,0.00002202538,0.00010495197,0.00039705547,0.97517836,0.000053712873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93624866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86459565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032381975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085361185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.526872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012965939","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0013","title":"Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness , and: Thinking, Fast and Slow , and: Information and Exclusion (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Psychology; Economics; Nudge theory; Political science; Social psychology; Public economics","score_opus":0.011874162383600046,"score_gpt":0.27119034685486126,"score_spread":0.2593161844712612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012965939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7694176,0.1874386,0.007489982,0.004047365,0.0009153405,0.0004785952,0.000030992363,0.000054915025,0.030126631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86836356,0.12811393,0.0019049807,0.0014261557,0.000076819706,1.7744776e-7,0.0000046070077,0.0000050006556,0.000104776445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918,0.00014806607,0.00020699711,0.00012643418,0.00013074477,0.00020773595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991806,0.000087289955,0.00029079532,0.00008891601,0.000050072078,0.0003022885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078904326,0.00010666324,0.00022705394,0.00003739872,0.00076935475,0.000030424992,0.000059408903,0.000098832264,0.00014195322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030830164,0.000095852,0.000021858099,0.000022193171,0.00013973235,0.0011454982,0.00010282883,0.00020232546,0.0000015704667],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016556727,0.000055240915,0.01694583,0.00021328093,0.00004271801,0.0000037784712,0.014847304,3.2182137e-7,0.00003767232,0.015984278,0.003995094,0.9477089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021416182,0.00039785897,0.87883604,0.00054003997,0.000066025816,0.00078553025,0.006982856,0.00007334131,8.873641e-7,0.0005488979,0.109420344,0.00020653893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010881944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018774911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058642003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013428573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99570465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014376924","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0023","title":"The Association of State and Indigenous Law: A Case Study in 'Legal Association'","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; State (computer science); Normative; Legal research; Political science; Association (psychology); Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Legal opinion; Associative property; Legal profession; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008501322687538827,"score_gpt":0.25486889242610916,"score_spread":0.24636756973857032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014376924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560589,0.000106291736,0.0000130489325,0.0009340792,0.000033047952,0.00015652228,0.0000065871227,0.0000036944461,0.042687807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819124,0.00021233418,0.000057480538,0.000021712925,0.000025082954,4.9473993e-8,1.5003813e-7,0.0000010548953,0.0014909072],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923134,0.00018506047,0.00012302319,0.000055075103,0.00026913796,0.00013639258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992938,0.00013062982,0.00030978807,0.00005054305,0.00016271161,0.000052525982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012099884,0.00003468369,0.00009125623,0.000008882791,0.0012408046,0.000052800526,0.00012897034,0.000038405473,0.00002348237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032791537,0.00003283651,0.000031099633,0.000038723498,0.000048275466,0.00034200156,0.000019955136,0.00010790028,6.111722e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010133777,0.0009891988,0.17589322,0.000004391897,0.00021156578,0.00037804578,0.5308862,0.00009182955,0.00008545262,0.27852523,0.00053022883,0.012303307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032288805,0.0005918025,0.22953965,0.000023289354,0.00014332224,0.000050975646,0.5042396,0.000044986373,0.00002034536,0.0045285537,0.25732842,0.00026019086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46085808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9238759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46301788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093045586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009069043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9543391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017701405","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1128","title":"JUSTIFYING FIDUCIARY REMEDIES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Economics; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.019099113735496668,"score_gpt":0.25268118527066724,"score_spread":0.23358207153517058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017701405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044991113,0.00043079854,0.0005422923,0.004560284,0.00017185554,0.00009977032,0.0000027020606,0.000025004896,0.9491762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296,0.00055218564,0.0023115233,0.00005879999,0.00018529235,5.084409e-8,3.9436114e-7,0.0000019692627,0.0039298367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995592,0.000042157513,0.000060812756,0.000053761018,0.00016015205,0.00012388466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958813,0.000029294624,0.000075955315,0.000063287414,0.00013579152,0.00010751309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017971853,0.000031803083,0.00006248747,0.00000627349,0.0012165856,0.00003438158,0.00022906734,0.000034935365,0.004066966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016042717,0.000033913082,0.000052566535,0.00001748683,0.00019983127,0.0006221769,0.000040787232,0.000074865966,0.000041515967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010106166,0.000079148835,0.0013090245,0.000010513171,0.00005400755,0.000009142804,0.039547708,0.000018331042,0.00077082176,0.8957568,0.03944364,0.022990765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014670199,0.000013187965,0.004550017,0.000016071757,0.000017083872,0.0000022843021,0.04741327,0.000019833213,0.000020543697,0.0021178161,0.9456173,0.000065851375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32073396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2330182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94796884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001608049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054125903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99684346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018534325","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.080912","title":"BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, IMMIGRATION, AND GLOBAL POVERTY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Naturalization; Immigration; Poverty; Political science; Pace; Global citizenship; Population; Institution; Deportation; Development economics; Statelessness; Inequality; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Nationality; Geography; Alien; Economics; Demography","score_opus":0.0061687815081890645,"score_gpt":0.21858054354721823,"score_spread":0.21241176203902917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018534325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48904103,0.0015245173,0.0031216168,0.0031570976,0.00043727114,0.00025869627,0.000019030496,0.000046040343,0.5023947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558574,0.0011694902,0.0008283948,0.00012528426,0.00014294178,5.643433e-8,0.0000028314246,0.0000019382537,0.0021433246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993243,0.0001202336,0.00010452491,0.0000858689,0.000233072,0.0001320086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993518,0.000020047071,0.000118232194,0.000058429192,0.00030754265,0.00014393682],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020897,0.000059299746,0.00009530931,0.000009698054,0.00096530496,0.00008577747,0.00013313223,0.00007335264,0.004321104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025298268,0.000055790504,0.00005418932,0.000031475574,0.0002019389,0.0009785377,0.000014293184,0.00005889845,0.000015852724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035148296,0.000043261556,0.012194609,0.0000059104186,0.00005831235,0.0000037459008,0.028260889,0.0000020842504,0.00022069365,0.8550549,0.093463615,0.010656793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011641396,0.00023255315,0.07486306,0.000059508784,0.00006384359,0.000026586786,0.09155026,0.00019875335,0.000081929895,0.040986925,0.7904332,0.00033920474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22772655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7396882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.814068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027861187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081567574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99658906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019028309","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.250712","title":"THE OFFICE OF OWNERSHIP","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Business; Property rights; Subject (documents); Law; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Common ownership; Property (philosophy); Right to property; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01649052370239258,"score_gpt":0.23994697288744257,"score_spread":0.22345644918504998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019028309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061773032,0.00032385977,0.00023936348,0.00447605,0.00008687123,0.00009860558,0.0000028080851,0.000007998676,0.9329914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954119,0.00029966084,0.00036703795,0.00001734084,0.00005451032,2.7106276e-8,1.2436428e-7,0.0000010622217,0.0038483888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996067,0.00005731565,0.000060885635,0.00003246359,0.0001507001,0.00009192655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951506,0.00007513582,0.0001123611,0.000071451366,0.00015894836,0.000067017165],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002530104,0.000022320255,0.00004684387,0.0000028245815,0.0010272317,0.000023506385,0.00031680948,0.000024307146,0.0011227502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017134382,0.000017052385,0.000053100433,0.000017820033,0.00031133706,0.00027134694,0.000028078868,0.00005445214,0.000014793048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010242701,0.000028848954,0.00032445023,0.0000017917187,0.000020986841,4.7792776e-7,0.006458886,0.0000061614433,0.00019703251,0.98159695,0.00538816,0.0059660203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011670776,0.00001640121,0.005251521,0.000005847979,0.000010025003,6.9985623e-7,0.031004181,0.000009599151,0.000027053215,0.0013760226,0.9621506,0.000031396274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2873564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2686457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008332408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057181845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020771747","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0002","title":"Law and Film: Where are the Mediators?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popular culture; Legal culture; Statute; Law; Sociology; Legal education; Fair use; Class (philosophy); Legal profession; Political science; Media studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010316664066615881,"score_gpt":0.21227367640987874,"score_spread":0.20195701234326285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020771747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08791935,0.007932703,0.000017796012,0.0060742507,0.00034750288,0.00010038193,0.0000138647765,0.000029523444,0.89756465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809794,0.0146246,0.00023040689,0.0003979517,0.00029891272,2.335035e-8,3.6000324e-7,0.0000028204445,0.0034655302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937606,0.00011067341,0.00005299344,0.000064740925,0.0002617556,0.00013378201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995714,0.0000418453,0.000103589104,0.00006477098,0.00010303132,0.00011535585],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002183116,0.00004879208,0.00008942392,7.5940915e-7,0.0033578768,0.000022832908,0.0002558465,0.00008836027,0.0010996939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008055002,0.000037696504,0.00008266439,0.000019292174,0.0011484309,0.00042814884,0.00003915528,0.00014290209,0.0000036509098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032918957,0.000054797547,0.0059330324,0.000009398615,0.00009718398,0.000084641455,0.20627351,0.000004422266,0.000020727311,0.68022716,0.10696373,0.00029850446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022401605,0.0000149867,0.0012662255,0.000014859044,0.00001945839,0.0000202308,0.15868129,0.0000012205486,0.0000048438587,0.00062543096,0.8390726,0.000054870045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061388463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48185968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8940991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010343772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039035996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021608390","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.070812ra","title":"RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND INDIVIDUALITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Individualism; Independence (probability theory); Relational theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03045350251775319,"score_gpt":0.2505324012269758,"score_spread":0.2200788987092226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021608390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50912654,0.00079437625,0.00013447767,0.005789096,0.00017504033,0.00017265392,0.0000063643674,0.00002664828,0.48377478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99327105,0.00020685195,0.0036801454,0.000038866525,0.0000876988,4.7835652e-8,6.061794e-7,0.0000012954113,0.0027134286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994218,0.000106819054,0.00007179347,0.000064286534,0.00021494609,0.000120375065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999532,0.00006357411,0.000098541,0.000030007855,0.00016117876,0.0001146912],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002558515,0.000043129272,0.000088779045,0.0000045125553,0.0014974761,0.000035225625,0.00011224914,0.00005063216,0.0030949393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034739376,0.000041387015,0.000043697495,0.00001273058,0.00045105864,0.0008946535,0.000056402998,0.00008447061,0.000013022066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016410318,0.00007541967,0.07594545,0.00000967808,0.00021414486,0.0000063293205,0.19895153,0.000007797388,0.00005705752,0.7019017,0.0088717025,0.01394281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035781146,0.000021828308,0.4760073,0.000012025637,0.0000237225,0.0000022806537,0.048754416,0.000008838688,0.000002288091,0.0016833091,0.47303283,0.00009335058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3403237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11609381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7002184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039859442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005316976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023229601","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0517","title":"Administrative penalties in the <i>Rechtsstaat</i>: On the emergence of the <i>Ordnungswidrigkeit</i> sanctioning system in post-war Germany","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law and Political Science","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; German; Politics; Enforcement; Democracy; State (computer science); Law; Statutory law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017888527232253076,"score_gpt":0.25132715204671763,"score_spread":0.23343862481446456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023229601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45304492,0.00010311047,0.000057294594,0.005045123,0.00034690095,0.00018333779,0.0000067732744,0.0000061485794,0.5412064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994088,0.00004405417,0.000032068852,0.00028854015,0.00006656799,1.4279838e-7,7.996702e-8,0.000001472938,0.00015827529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800444,0.0010168245,0.00016155797,0.000093700335,0.00049540104,0.00022805633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899954,0.0004987762,0.00018481235,0.00014803151,0.0001099719,0.00005889032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021156387,0.00006566566,0.000119589335,0.000010810005,0.0011028252,0.000025634528,0.0008628328,0.000047001402,0.00027242137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013191898,0.000036110374,0.00008905857,0.000109786895,0.0007672198,0.00031720384,0.00004921592,0.00022549652,0.0000027858964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034562756,0.000046828176,0.0023212933,0.0000074518616,0.000006801388,0.0000039849992,0.03766745,0.000035429326,0.00008920918,0.95926744,0.0003087446,0.000210807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079101423,0.0005089012,0.08514401,0.00054656324,0.000058983802,0.000025689287,0.7911039,0.00021525829,0.00060759677,0.005027146,0.115662426,0.0003084952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14234492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46970004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015788287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015671874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86336625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024212870","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0312","title":"When tribalism meets liberalism: Human rights and Indigenous boundary problems in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Democracy; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Tribalism; Citizenship; Human rights; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.010950430013658355,"score_gpt":0.2184607752053984,"score_spread":0.20751034519174003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024212870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428781,0.0009115133,0.000006630627,0.0012970059,0.00018470721,0.00016348109,0.000007726551,0.000011507664,0.054539323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983747,0.000096553405,0.00027855433,0.00004995019,0.00009549564,7.067936e-8,0.000001219316,0.000002861765,0.0011005959],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888,0.00023506196,0.00013659957,0.00011836728,0.00035561202,0.00027433125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999463,0.000050705898,0.0001494635,0.000056323694,0.00010836428,0.00017214712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003838685,0.00008825685,0.00021259331,0.0000116507,0.0027057054,0.000052253585,0.00025344416,0.0000612624,0.00028077138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012295507,0.00008292215,0.000041598287,0.000021488133,0.00033095133,0.0004990619,0.0000628271,0.00014597128,6.362823e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050506776,0.00012703476,0.037291974,0.00004972841,0.00023385609,0.00012759591,0.8882481,0.000043970802,0.000104352584,0.056080323,0.013930008,0.003712549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010505634,0.000063501524,0.045308907,0.00006410759,0.000031356005,0.0000063461375,0.02102095,0.000005454415,0.000007596539,0.0035406952,0.9286921,0.00020843567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9147621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001956272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019710575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024261585","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0003","title":"New Modes and Orders: The Difficulties of a Jus Post Bellum of Constitutional Transformation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformation (genetics); Political science; Law; Jus ad bellum; Philosophy; Chemistry; International law; Use of force","score_opus":0.006852739900187109,"score_gpt":0.21864763803405782,"score_spread":0.2117948981338707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024261585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84459054,0.000076445045,0.0013991272,0.00089303724,0.00013290433,0.0000672831,0.00002915611,0.0000033068254,0.1528082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864936,0.00003903931,0.00065436756,0.000008817259,0.00005157306,6.8695334e-9,0.0000013633921,5.786904e-7,0.00059490727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960405,0.000027456843,0.00008240927,0.000029308341,0.00020486781,0.00005193677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954754,0.000037576283,0.000109171684,0.000026889442,0.00024007433,0.000038776492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014795126,0.000029719944,0.000066350236,0.000010764054,0.0005229532,0.0000109639495,0.00014012588,0.00003419177,0.0007976759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007382104,0.00002278463,0.00004676531,0.0000059881468,0.0010651688,0.0003981507,0.00000894585,0.000065761174,3.6125456e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036483354,0.000017433944,0.000037739534,0.0000037119178,0.000022799995,4.5291935e-7,0.01314346,0.000011122481,0.0010082787,0.9854152,0.00007888792,0.00022441415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008229734,0.0008897279,0.044952974,0.00042607522,0.00055617385,0.00013744681,0.23451662,0.00052677403,0.007083744,0.22864187,0.47326866,0.00077019434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08874445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37683976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75677335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028180866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013672932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9173237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025174668","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.091212","title":"OPINION WRITING AND AUTHORSHIP ON THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legal writing; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Style (visual arts); Writing style; Government (linguistics); Political science; Dissenting opinion; Judicial opinion; Staffing; Sociology; Literature; Linguistics; Philosophy; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.023712041430609454,"score_gpt":0.22749929703170937,"score_spread":0.20378725560109992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025174668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33998123,0.00079073606,0.000029917002,0.015400048,0.0002473475,0.000096494085,0.0000074277896,0.0000045165075,0.6434423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999448,0.00024570528,0.000039525963,0.000057064775,0.00007480994,1.7902224e-8,1.1060372e-7,5.475602e-7,0.00013422857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995421,0.00006952656,0.000053269046,0.000034387856,0.00021231601,0.00008840092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996345,0.000092325456,0.00006814644,0.000023061799,0.00012653161,0.000055452107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026444576,0.000027002203,0.00006165449,0.0000032525297,0.0011969146,0.000010385904,0.00010465792,0.000018717445,0.00053494255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003820514,0.0000218319,0.000021013419,0.000011651005,0.000356505,0.00013261694,0.000023847368,0.000055340683,5.0542207e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011070021,0.000010703148,0.0031706472,0.0000020393156,0.000029166391,0.0000016257655,0.004241616,0.0000032941966,0.000024155868,0.98237383,0.009124056,0.001007798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062491646,0.00016908238,0.21019784,0.00025390903,0.000044164608,0.000008663398,0.3009421,0.000037190777,0.00006142038,0.040383127,0.44702873,0.00024887276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98758614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98606473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014448325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017551088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.920582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025993770","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0001","title":"Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public sphere; Law; Secularism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Reasonable accommodation; Democracy; Politics; Sharia; Public space; Context (archaeology); Political science; Islam; Theology; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.007957179484469331,"score_gpt":0.23580184041575847,"score_spread":0.22784466093128913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025993770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01704205,0.009162903,0.000068363675,0.004601595,0.00020590931,0.000061807135,0.0000038303842,0.000006405815,0.96884716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98719287,0.01140564,0.0004165637,0.0006688588,0.000065104614,1.4734592e-8,2.1650925e-7,0.0000011452581,0.00024958298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995547,0.00008048939,0.000072857874,0.000060776834,0.00012572196,0.00010543361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961495,0.000088410896,0.000049783706,0.000037071262,0.000060110713,0.00014965225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030512005,0.000037764814,0.00011544847,0.000005928919,0.00035804385,0.000007321144,0.0000818352,0.000049027683,0.00042188575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044199933,0.000038510356,0.000027246511,0.000011135848,0.0018565126,0.00016504123,0.000024966947,0.00014991291,7.9464e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011314893,0.000013395975,0.00041060927,0.000006080984,0.000003174251,0.000012785708,0.00051513815,2.2569413e-8,0.000011072407,0.99695176,0.00127039,0.0007942561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019694412,0.000030386767,0.00029850914,0.000053596763,0.000015767835,0.000027716025,0.0009223686,0.0000013200923,9.986701e-7,0.0045146197,0.9938858,0.000051976647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18641889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3616393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018275283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012488548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8189988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026316860","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.23","title":"JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial restraint; Adjudication; Political science; Worry; Economic Justice; Law; Reputation; Honesty; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01814470664394893,"score_gpt":0.26093746463234535,"score_spread":0.24279275798839642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026316860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18653984,0.00023113916,0.000050548842,0.0035633885,0.00049076066,0.00006185088,0.000005544968,0.000003853049,0.80905306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923426,0.00022456559,0.00018852514,0.00006407322,0.00023977079,1.6779833e-8,1.3790508e-7,6.189869e-7,0.000048023267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993258,0.00008002682,0.00008032611,0.000043129367,0.00036420286,0.000106495056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996356,0.00008309353,0.00008923397,0.000042246833,0.00011377858,0.000036044636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077274244,0.000031495172,0.000083642,0.000009391719,0.0007842381,0.00001238008,0.00041816878,0.000040435087,0.0004589415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082910716,0.000026869966,0.000054166714,0.000034177538,0.0009669462,0.00017111188,0.000033762255,0.00015362859,0.0000017187648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003083657,0.00004776301,0.000704344,0.000001540783,0.000012354451,0.00001717681,0.014574803,0.000002808323,0.00020456103,0.9820263,0.00076722703,0.0016102832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008253928,0.00012979655,0.10736786,0.000052251075,0.00015876062,0.000018440755,0.26554507,0.0000037573036,0.00002593438,0.04874052,0.57698005,0.00015216546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3608528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85582095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005784122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013505295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64340335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026561431","doi":"10.2307/825912","title":"The Centrality of the Act Requirement for Criminal Attempts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Criminology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04759333073247084,"score_gpt":0.29318477346848326,"score_spread":0.2455914427360124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026561431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6677741,0.0014094055,0.0090438,0.009930407,0.0023045298,0.0010425126,0.000060706592,0.00003253055,0.30840203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972384,0.0011914913,0.0003096955,0.000040762123,0.00017192893,4.2816758e-8,5.1168405e-7,0.0000023569482,0.0010448343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921393,0.00020738118,0.00010541962,0.00006076892,0.00025864298,0.00015387707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936736,0.000081470745,0.00020292033,0.000120183744,0.00017198465,0.000056057823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008912245,0.000039608167,0.0000644479,0.0000037906116,0.001984692,0.000025733872,0.0004267309,0.00002506038,0.0001578235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076445285,0.00002757253,0.000107923806,0.00002022171,0.00033663222,0.00033331837,0.00005131593,0.00007035482,0.0000010862815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003564801,0.00057206675,0.0069134277,0.00021299995,0.00035391157,0.000039009417,0.118071504,0.000066155095,0.0035345978,0.6648762,0.027907336,0.17388794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040553146,0.000132177,0.008780432,0.000050611347,0.00018460474,0.000007860057,0.09953299,0.000011100546,0.00018556217,0.0004504864,0.8901954,0.000063208696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04516705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20895441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8622881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020806454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007932607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027099529","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0013","title":"Liberal Democracy and the Social Acceleration of Time (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legislature; Liberal democracy; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.007068407538718789,"score_gpt":0.2302690120485928,"score_spread":0.223200604509874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027099529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030865392,0.0028794333,0.000104587176,0.010373762,0.000063920605,0.00011066846,0.0000053388653,0.0000068820345,0.95559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934729,0.0032258418,0.00019561773,0.00022318996,0.00020742668,2.0718444e-8,7.902146e-7,0.0000013709532,0.0026728758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995488,0.00013911867,0.00008874232,0.000036468635,0.00009444597,0.00009240692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999701,0.00006292065,0.000110022505,0.000025587378,0.00006337244,0.000037068003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041404323,0.00002923292,0.000116118885,0.0000037728553,0.00084025465,0.000010119872,0.00011578504,0.000031811982,0.0011417079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015147457,0.000025081375,0.00006630262,0.000009761573,0.00055368204,0.00035306902,0.00002330712,0.00005040917,0.0000023789858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003479956,0.000021454776,0.00009646237,0.000011480992,0.000015229306,0.0000013451042,0.0016836833,5.034154e-7,0.000017096356,0.9867904,0.008959157,0.002368339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005223388,0.00010770097,0.024054244,0.00024329509,0.00036211728,0.000019395744,0.008650748,0.000103155086,0.000072972616,0.15053467,0.8102992,0.0003291111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056147505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042218138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068847665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004689329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030102691","doi":"10.3138/utlj.52.3.253","title":"Dealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Tort; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.017026486490842728,"score_gpt":0.23118182172628224,"score_spread":0.2141553352354395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030102691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96335334,0.001858859,0.00003675347,0.0034903507,0.00007654495,0.00015084041,0.0000066288003,0.0000041161147,0.031022547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982244,0.0010359546,0.00035525224,0.000027385582,0.00005311771,5.4799532e-8,1.4899227e-7,0.0000016948927,0.000301997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999178,0.00019388631,0.000097794924,0.00007174672,0.00033606665,0.00012251224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918664,0.00014274269,0.00019959963,0.000038391267,0.00034998707,0.00008264499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002309802,0.000055352037,0.00012165368,0.000008536652,0.0011032494,0.000025610292,0.0001528837,0.00002603114,0.00028077594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009349418,0.000042143503,0.000020290767,0.000043888875,0.00046334774,0.0007650908,0.000023546187,0.00013708632,2.7940908e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028953305,0.000063328225,0.018465906,0.0000420032,0.00032152288,0.00012545667,0.8833268,0.000543494,0.00010386684,0.087130725,0.008547643,0.0010396712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009354628,0.00007091039,0.06569548,0.000127722,0.0001127591,0.000003931894,0.915519,0.000059939994,0.00004347088,0.000082914594,0.017218422,0.00012997014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087047815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001166168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018897651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8485413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030652659","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0020","title":"The Contextual Turn: Iacobucci's Legacy and the Standard of Review in Administrative Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Standard of review; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Scrutiny; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02791156109271762,"score_gpt":0.3187172411592737,"score_spread":0.29080568006655605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030652659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036472924,0.0970898,0.00033940675,0.029674236,0.0003313491,0.00057722605,0.000016926539,0.000010134619,0.835488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97784483,0.021609914,0.00009549557,0.00012949496,0.00004352854,2.7287639e-8,1.13514396e-7,0.0000014065364,0.00027519788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898595,0.00027998118,0.00018152017,0.000066274595,0.0003257255,0.00016057007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988693,0.0005642588,0.00021587836,0.00008014688,0.00018951342,0.000080880374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032922733,0.000054234868,0.00019913018,0.000004860313,0.00097017916,0.000037912094,0.00030702047,0.00003385165,0.00017136591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001261102,0.000035342367,0.00008190306,0.000031628133,0.001934459,0.000514271,0.00004140582,0.00014270381,4.727547e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078122824,0.00001392328,0.00009071113,0.000024015402,0.000019576171,0.000022187796,0.013687091,1.6495085e-7,0.0000044431977,0.9783027,0.00086673285,0.0061872164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010523831,0.00019640988,0.00084238756,0.00060552376,0.00006648746,0.000017555387,0.13601013,7.7886403e-7,0.000028618453,0.002032595,0.8590745,0.00007268344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11633828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8525948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97627014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014697194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011756685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8895461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031497028","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0026","title":"Banging Constitutional Bibles: Observing Constitutional Culture in Transition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Modernity; Political economy; Globalization; Ideology; Citizenship; Face (sociological concept); Political science; State (computer science); Economic history; Sociology; Law; History; Social science","score_opus":0.021269041020626062,"score_gpt":0.25743577320305894,"score_spread":0.23616673218243286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031497028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14005491,0.008183916,0.010560344,0.012975925,0.00086245284,0.0004540549,0.00008530197,0.00010902136,0.8267141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393976,0.00096523506,0.0044299928,0.00010033757,0.00027001897,7.1477835e-8,0.0000038687795,0.0000011715972,0.00028956388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907506,0.00011239126,0.00013618742,0.00010415625,0.00035735493,0.00021486534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951833,0.000042722368,0.00009723552,0.00003437875,0.0002039171,0.000103416685],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003470544,0.00007867978,0.0001430872,0.000026219224,0.001735474,0.000031378848,0.00018519851,0.00009031192,0.0013071804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036121273,0.000080249694,0.00010532119,0.00007296188,0.0022093584,0.0011953949,0.000026332056,0.00016546262,0.000008659271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041997067,0.000086594875,0.002201278,0.0000101664755,0.00005857725,0.00003066512,0.065724134,0.0017241723,0.00032224428,0.92692035,0.0017626281,0.0011171665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018727883,0.000035810786,0.0066690687,0.00027048355,0.000058258196,0.000035118785,0.14226504,0.0001946067,0.00004622228,0.0006032627,0.84764105,0.00030829327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038036764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22394188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9263171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012111879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015579391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031959760","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.1","title":"THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Water Resources and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Principal (computer security); Judicial independence; Enforcement; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.004430792985953958,"score_gpt":0.20821857349087775,"score_spread":0.2037877805049238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031959760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55682164,0.0002177066,0.00000838771,0.0066016708,0.00023304377,0.00007064054,0.000005092377,0.0000019978877,0.43603978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996088,0.000050218554,0.000021078242,0.000049874307,0.000077353994,1.2586365e-8,3.7469697e-8,5.4268236e-7,0.00019205255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939567,0.00012906358,0.000059029495,0.000032236916,0.00025231412,0.00013169549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966484,0.00007359508,0.00009020931,0.0000858742,0.00005016015,0.000035292393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000448915,0.000025627178,0.000045072593,0.0000022214235,0.0009191699,0.000022927648,0.00048276628,0.000033874167,0.000089928704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037019792,0.000013619156,0.00005606011,0.000015131675,0.0009870295,0.00012433587,0.00003257319,0.00015608383,7.0756994e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010932247,0.00001603172,0.0058169845,4.2093026e-7,0.0000039722545,0.0000016323175,0.0073242183,0.0000020249,0.00012877228,0.9859384,0.0001955677,0.00056106807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015482168,0.000012314423,0.024074366,0.00001099122,0.000008895191,0.000007698885,0.04909219,0.000010221022,0.00008931958,0.008045083,0.9184681,0.000026005655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26606017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006653857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075106764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73882717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034043494","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0302-3","title":"INJUSTICE AMPLIFIED BY HIV NON-DISCLOSURE RULING","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Punitive damages; Supreme court; Charter; Test (biology); Political science; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Hiv test; Law; Criminology; Transmission (telecommunications); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Virology; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.009187688988705362,"score_gpt":0.22093227853897418,"score_spread":0.2117445895502688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034043494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19221155,0.00029136002,0.0033618796,0.001590487,0.0004131429,0.00018663105,0.000009050252,0.00003111535,0.8019048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815468,0.00022570141,0.0031403734,0.000089815054,0.0001514575,4.845308e-8,0.0000020975979,0.000004216584,0.014839474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924326,0.00006190966,0.00010449267,0.000090265174,0.00029120073,0.00020887122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940884,0.000032416367,0.00011647222,0.000066527966,0.00017134266,0.00020440188],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025846143,0.000063292566,0.000116616015,0.000011111372,0.0013876292,0.00007439995,0.0002923424,0.00006427477,0.009858317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009255875,0.00005894744,0.00005913441,0.000018504701,0.0001960989,0.0006551275,0.000039955696,0.00010544729,0.000085513915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008082832,0.00029868234,0.0024081604,0.000032504868,0.00023793345,0.00006212818,0.21093068,0.000027438668,0.0012291721,0.22402185,0.55055606,0.010114555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006534477,0.000043917447,0.003866968,0.000046364126,0.00003789318,0.0000032030625,0.06789566,0.000026035046,0.000041062143,0.002016099,0.9251658,0.00020357249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12504603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08785352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78933525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028050184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010434838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034465670","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0066","title":"Legal universalism: Persistent objections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.011496792284269482,"score_gpt":0.2280273932835177,"score_spread":0.21653060099924823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034465670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043296278,0.00019535134,0.000106761414,0.0015738904,0.00086148875,0.00003688371,0.0000064494957,0.000019292827,0.9539036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711674,0.00029057483,0.00039131445,0.00003340472,0.0002657192,1.10306395e-8,3.8723525e-7,0.0000012878585,0.0019005719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999476,0.00004311837,0.000054650714,0.000065087785,0.00022534243,0.00013580635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995455,0.000023926847,0.00006418327,0.00004522476,0.00020249614,0.00011867563],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017775391,0.00004326548,0.00008188492,0.000012404371,0.0026729703,0.000023725803,0.00019206425,0.0000505218,0.0020544855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020606712,0.0000481816,0.00014729977,0.000030005393,0.0008617832,0.00046603734,0.000036177746,0.00015341344,0.000010492528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018248233,0.000037061902,0.00041514792,4.997804e-7,0.00005968646,0.000018013392,0.005157871,0.000005425269,0.00015200413,0.9919224,0.0015456103,0.00066803227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021341298,0.00003305429,0.0014247507,0.000006304252,0.000048884445,0.000016355805,0.064153984,0.0000025788233,0.0000055070254,0.0011647108,0.9328631,0.00006732966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.564569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8468473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019549318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019328331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036083413","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0006","title":"Choices and Approaches: Antiterrorism Law and Civil Society in the United States and the United Kingdom After September 11","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Civil liberties; Kingdom; Political science; Law; Commission; Context (archaeology); Civil society; Scope (computer science); Counter terrorism; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.05957556204022244,"score_gpt":0.2521517273917206,"score_spread":0.19257616535149816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036083413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91581726,0.0012512411,0.000058144768,0.0012169258,0.000091907146,0.00017900193,0.000009709344,0.000013142505,0.08136265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971698,0.0014848489,0.00023979945,0.00081524556,0.00006507367,1.5081152e-7,0.000002416211,0.0000041903345,0.0002184878],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884677,0.00049558986,0.00010967959,0.00012723377,0.00023124217,0.00018949628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993805,0.00023157062,0.00012806949,0.00009372263,0.000074668016,0.00009146037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014358679,0.000096624055,0.00015169398,0.000019778985,0.0010762635,0.0001008373,0.00023115044,0.00012615733,0.00015982088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012416384,0.00006478349,0.00006010594,0.00006586565,0.002699366,0.00050670735,0.00007359128,0.00028426177,2.343961e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018004177,0.000060516453,0.01930919,0.000026435748,0.00009198012,0.000019378485,0.62786144,0.000002979499,0.0000012247212,0.35180816,0.0005258646,0.00011278181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020691657,0.000056535235,0.039980724,0.00007233494,0.00012533038,0.00001822722,0.29793194,0.0002487724,0.0000018117076,0.0035230236,0.6557858,0.00018632963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48278728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7634399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65525997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046589106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025291583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99459267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036896611","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0012","title":"An Object Lesson in Speculation: Multiple Views of the Cathedral in Leaf v. International Galleries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Speculation; Object (grammar); Art; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Finance","score_opus":0.02930546553526868,"score_gpt":0.2058389816630228,"score_spread":0.17653351612775414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036896611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83363223,0.00018708379,0.000035612895,0.00011984535,0.00024511962,0.00004278597,0.0000073711344,0.0000034768484,0.1657265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973286,0.000110928486,0.00011640698,0.000013962255,0.00007803413,3.0207232e-8,0.0000021367741,0.000002264355,0.002347635],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950725,0.00008577903,0.00014233038,0.000062211024,0.00013678224,0.00006562905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965805,0.000016378212,0.00014547416,0.00008667595,0.00007134077,0.000022105372],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014420561,0.00005007331,0.00012786643,0.000035051486,0.0003057953,0.0000072340126,0.00022209533,0.000020573187,0.003278028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000074194463,0.00004358104,0.000102935155,0.000011090305,0.00027574474,0.0005614021,0.000029252758,0.000081257145,0.0000010605283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007705416,0.0007413289,0.16285048,0.000023320707,0.00016690795,0.00010530257,0.71571344,0.0014477253,0.0005017776,0.112417884,0.0025494562,0.002711846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018812877,0.00014621623,0.14605382,0.00009549072,0.00004454793,0.000026932437,0.06399713,0.0014566765,0.00008310496,0.00039974085,0.7855981,0.00021693954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039016183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83039993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79138374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018185154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003109728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039003416","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0011","title":"Why compare?: Comments on Kevin Jon Heller and Markus D Dubber's The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05712357264414657,"score_gpt":0.3110658969474713,"score_spread":0.2539423243033247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039003416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24179296,0.005517516,0.00020068066,0.0015844071,0.00039535188,0.00018851223,0.000024837953,0.000007796699,0.75028795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982022,0.0006028896,0.00016752967,0.00036898835,0.00011131039,8.84233e-8,0.000001011285,0.0000019201698,0.00054407166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999031,0.00026849806,0.00012539035,0.000069784444,0.00033866632,0.00016665117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922776,0.00021053194,0.00019020603,0.000065366694,0.00020804259,0.00009809159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033910602,0.00008346386,0.0002099764,0.000011834333,0.0012627756,0.000022748758,0.00023509412,0.000023279608,0.0008661635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061837673,0.000067001194,0.00007698105,0.00001723249,0.0008976938,0.00043440366,0.000082952,0.000109156936,0.0000049497226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037539616,0.00029377444,0.0063303425,0.000008555688,0.00030218216,0.0000025366012,0.080047786,0.000009977777,0.00006791011,0.8472782,0.06498857,0.0002947916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060856063,0.00016514334,0.014800843,0.00011295759,0.0000772936,0.0000040434297,0.051062886,0.000013576542,0.00024757278,0.00039251725,0.93241435,0.00010025561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081126824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23884551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016785091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001874233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97123766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039123807","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0006","title":"The Natural Law Duty to Recognize Private Property Ownership: Kant's Theory of Property in His Doctrine of Right","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Duty; Law; Doctrine; Public property; State (computer science); Private property; Law and economics; Political science; Property law; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012214894139636926,"score_gpt":0.21932444111470115,"score_spread":0.20710954697506423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039123807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15402257,0.0021375446,0.00007201949,0.0068943975,0.000592176,0.0008697645,0.000024610577,0.000036305762,0.83535063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97029895,0.00030758503,0.0005678341,0.000052765583,0.00012468555,1.8619967e-7,0.0000012177601,0.000006302346,0.028640477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812216,0.0005001252,0.00035681154,0.00017147142,0.00049569964,0.00035370764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988799,0.000115476214,0.00032643808,0.00019585711,0.0003588256,0.00012351784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015879781,0.00013156747,0.00032416056,0.000035440524,0.00082881405,0.000037838672,0.0007711616,0.00008661389,0.0006469464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067582696,0.000057652836,0.0001583302,0.00012762398,0.0008804207,0.0006741668,0.0001120362,0.00025616592,0.0000035544813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019026026,0.000403512,0.0009953722,0.000043090542,0.00011361722,0.00006972117,0.008161665,0.000024992623,0.003544317,0.96269244,0.0032449157,0.018803762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011169827,0.00021704065,0.00248234,0.0001478124,0.00004059086,0.000008418867,0.0022160928,0.00001903279,0.0023717259,0.00410388,0.98708713,0.00018894067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41349953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69049877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98384225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003805753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016243303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70836097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039144629","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.300412ra","title":"THE END OF THE ROAD TO SERFDOM?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Rule of law; Democracy; Law and economics; Serfdom; Bureaucracy; Order (exchange); Oppression; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.021419505765335245,"score_gpt":0.25603169860590774,"score_spread":0.2346121928405725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039144629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0670392,0.0001574402,0.000034165114,0.035995573,0.00034963325,0.00010670447,0.000004348698,0.0000052086602,0.8963077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976631,0.0000815978,0.00009319367,0.0002172167,0.00011695223,1.823627e-8,2.7133554e-8,0.0000012211182,0.0018267024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927056,0.0001745251,0.000071273855,0.000039656312,0.00028536023,0.00015862344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939454,0.00012740832,0.00006958737,0.00010157936,0.00017042406,0.00013645092],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044848135,0.000032101132,0.00006356232,0.0000033461884,0.0014446272,0.000022261655,0.00052207155,0.000049219267,0.0008330696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009944505,0.000020990186,0.00008493788,0.000023852304,0.0008274672,0.00024555545,0.000073543015,0.00013236827,0.000013563361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010934961,0.000015901496,0.00014316823,0.0000016100073,0.000016788901,6.1894826e-7,0.010500086,0.000004441541,0.000058663605,0.98433334,0.002159994,0.0027544494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034541206,0.00008289045,0.026233666,0.000052166917,0.000039480998,0.000003272068,0.04465882,0.0000116726405,0.00014474361,0.19757155,0.7307377,0.00011864987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26579288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2142906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9306239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013687996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009627553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039683354","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.261112","title":"HUGO PREUSS’S CONCEPT OF THE <i>VOLK</i>: CRITICAL CONFUSION OR SOPHISTICATED CONCEPTION?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Democracy; Politics; Mythology; Political science; State (computer science); Doctrine; Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.019096488003876543,"score_gpt":0.27489956550357,"score_spread":0.25580307749969344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039683354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07427849,0.00032408838,0.0009616023,0.0034664697,0.00072869007,0.00028309255,0.000040009723,0.000028370856,0.9198892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973393,0.00006282799,0.00029516127,0.00019344817,0.00011143608,6.313256e-8,4.636457e-7,0.0000024389808,0.0019948431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988328,0.00043136976,0.00014784253,0.0000875076,0.00026362788,0.00023683971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988499,0.00036833776,0.00011698594,0.0001228792,0.0003589346,0.00018290669],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002708977,0.00006315235,0.00017017455,0.0000066562216,0.00094120146,0.00001389912,0.00041139062,0.00013510798,0.024147723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038839868,0.000047003272,0.000112118454,0.000028666076,0.0035891156,0.00037240618,0.00008527988,0.00016662889,0.000017727956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004481402,0.000057150708,0.00018294224,0.0000035418905,0.00002064436,0.000003577309,0.0025108529,0.000001152452,0.000088596644,0.9956975,0.0011454041,0.00024380781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040830635,0.00081257673,0.034679744,0.00031747264,0.0004083457,0.000059202543,0.11153043,0.00024539963,0.0013798617,0.7024011,0.14344853,0.0006342539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023686606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005816192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92306083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015040416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018251789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039981008","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0014","title":"Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); German; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Constitution; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0136201582477239,"score_gpt":0.2739484023916838,"score_spread":0.2603282441439599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039981008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22476631,0.0010972283,0.00033643938,0.0020330742,0.00020125232,0.0000829918,0.000012961828,0.0000069071157,0.7714628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992357,0.00029785617,0.00022875053,0.000057859248,0.00007640358,1.3214352e-8,5.6536436e-7,4.3996263e-7,0.00010239474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999412,0.000032631426,0.00008758798,0.000063710024,0.000211609,0.00019244185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955654,0.00003030655,0.000053286705,0.000021479396,0.00012526142,0.0002131523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007879758,0.000035184326,0.000072550574,0.000022243363,0.0011670127,0.0000106529205,0.00009080361,0.000040443796,0.00040111959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000319716,0.000039819122,0.000025283227,0.00003091228,0.0020303929,0.00030198917,0.000017917284,0.00007348517,0.0000021605385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014495708,0.000014025737,0.06914519,8.990863e-7,0.000008630541,0.00006251569,0.001775138,0.0000012405512,0.0000059135896,0.9281664,0.00013304502,0.00067250297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002786601,0.000016327573,0.46763024,0.000031398515,0.000010362591,0.000023477442,0.0072772256,0.000001529214,0.0000032331277,0.015395504,0.50924015,0.00009189017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97997284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063956005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007100809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040095158","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0001","title":"Fuzzy rules and clear enough standards: The Uses and Abuses of &lt;i&gt;Pierson v Post&lt;/i&gt;","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Style (visual arts); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Literature; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.01067645475033622,"score_gpt":0.17542192271973192,"score_spread":0.1647454679693957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040095158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8795764,0.013996988,0.00011394267,0.0005384156,0.000281152,0.00017451403,0.00033824894,0.000009755996,0.10497059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99162495,0.0076010786,0.00032898816,0.000060971124,0.000120100034,1.357715e-7,0.0000018367923,0.000011473729,0.0002504648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913013,0.00003615279,0.00037482887,0.00018888018,0.000064106025,0.00020589215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987705,0.00007183858,0.00070781016,0.00017119588,0.0001510984,0.00012760801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005394006,0.00011133891,0.00044137987,0.000044306737,0.0004367714,0.000087561784,0.00024925932,0.000096329815,0.0006911395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042369185,0.00012406122,0.000112471775,0.000019112047,0.00052639464,0.0008368177,0.00008548489,0.00008927025,0.000014187595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015951517,0.00008385603,0.010017889,0.000077314806,0.00034022197,0.000006637235,0.010281906,0.000016180818,0.00032004653,0.9716757,0.0042119296,0.0028088125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032782364,0.0009710189,0.123287134,0.00019196716,0.00010273927,0.000106461295,0.0112321135,0.00022180933,0.00008625491,0.05698169,0.8028542,0.0006864072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027460804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025415044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.914694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019880285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034748937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040334088","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2418","title":"Unsettling the lawyers: Other forms of justice in Indigenous claims of expropriation, abuse, and injustice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Injustice; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.008375183208198819,"score_gpt":0.18175576992857806,"score_spread":0.17338058672037923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040334088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98529094,0.00011724971,0.0008622566,0.000065565924,0.000093382936,0.00008816029,0.0000017650756,0.000005637922,0.013475009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994084,0.00004704115,0.00022272712,0.00008226547,0.00015816778,3.132067e-8,0.0000011359616,0.000005513813,0.00007471328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994611,0.000017191238,0.00018375185,0.000075006414,0.00015501976,0.000107908156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991935,0.000045431236,0.000451416,0.000103555474,0.0001955731,0.000010562921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039487806,0.00006987706,0.00016161916,0.000043684908,0.00026150126,0.00002974694,0.00021048351,0.000042755742,0.00015144459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061456717,0.00005347907,0.000040561004,0.000043667224,0.00012842237,0.0008274587,0.000044899345,0.00008714627,0.0000015729723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037236762,0.0001877937,0.015502366,0.0006061523,0.00008925694,0.000008955937,0.015317602,0.00041617887,0.0007778543,0.9632107,0.0002537458,0.0032570288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017567458,0.0006876063,0.2427926,0.0022947178,0.003111141,0.00005765369,0.11606057,0.0076833023,0.00093230105,0.32501382,0.28205347,0.0017453469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015248085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10494708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6381969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003493864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014127148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99130946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040584697","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0053","title":"Preference, pluralism, and proportionality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023434782033723903,"score_gpt":0.17786960044065103,"score_spread":0.15443481840692713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040584697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53895235,0.001468344,0.00030687198,0.00078823365,0.0003194382,0.000046508907,0.00006478236,0.00000871702,0.45804474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979928,0.00024678698,0.0008789309,0.000030031453,0.000050479415,2.9957775e-8,0.0000011000967,0.0000011047367,0.000798699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971014,0.0000035320545,0.00010931194,0.00008064861,0.000026909931,0.00006944795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970585,0.000007358034,0.00013474522,0.000048187692,0.00005053746,0.000053291027],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013323629,0.000040560924,0.000111159265,0.000009239434,0.00030028424,0.000015329664,0.00008721383,0.000032836382,0.0013952833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010743982,0.00004335813,0.000042010346,0.000009583876,0.00022644296,0.000338381,0.00004234863,0.00010216383,0.000012558345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011676963,0.000022943654,0.024861174,0.0000029870187,0.000029693218,0.0000029096334,0.00020311172,6.2065084e-7,0.000028339842,0.974164,0.00034211492,0.0003303927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005135834,0.000039357215,0.22650783,0.0000071052696,0.000008538743,0.000040746876,0.00029516546,0.000020509517,0.000016458267,0.04460342,0.7278277,0.00011956179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01842099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025390623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036173504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013853666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040736168","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0068","title":"Reinventing the night-watchman state?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Language change; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Political science; Private security; Criminal law; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.020689580146145886,"score_gpt":0.2874990188203944,"score_spread":0.26680943867424856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040736168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60063785,0.000018249204,0.000081727085,0.0028478317,0.00043561214,0.000036920046,0.0000026168993,0.000012251455,0.39592692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931429,0.00022154205,0.0006750993,0.00008103363,0.00018819304,9.065835e-9,2.4541657e-7,0.0000021545532,0.0056888442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943465,0.00012203649,0.00006204351,0.000048080423,0.0001848102,0.00014837961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952716,0.0000756008,0.00013089851,0.000088647896,0.000080193015,0.000097511744],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069081684,0.000034193297,0.00005605836,0.0000065756512,0.002392465,0.000055563236,0.00030859577,0.00003682331,0.0039262758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021604752,0.000028800117,0.000070048955,0.000020049882,0.00029562006,0.0005773516,0.000033128723,0.00023884357,0.00001577355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006799809,0.00015878424,0.012704469,0.000008032483,0.00014705761,0.000042327454,0.68175364,0.00005433617,0.0033664482,0.2632155,0.019089524,0.019391876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014774466,0.000021636446,0.014802414,0.00000828591,0.000025472063,0.000018160381,0.0419733,0.0000133415115,0.000009311503,0.0007134095,0.94220877,0.00005816719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78619736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9670628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92311925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006221942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006454416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040771557","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.169","title":"LAW AND ECONOMICS IN THE LEGAL ACADEMY, OR, WHAT I SHOULD HAVE SAID TO DISCIPULUS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sketch; Normative; Perspective (graphical); Audience measurement; Empirical legal studies; Dominance (genetics); Legal research; Legal realism; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.030816844686630884,"score_gpt":0.22232812137493319,"score_spread":0.1915112766883023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040771557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65735054,0.001363942,0.00015333119,0.006996001,0.0016382935,0.0003456015,0.000097809636,0.00001233149,0.33204216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959113,0.0016407919,0.00027976252,0.0014629625,0.00031470234,2.645175e-7,0.0000015062594,0.000011447399,0.000377263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990095,0.000027743332,0.00041197063,0.0002505089,0.00003172998,0.00026854355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992358,0.000059103902,0.00032459537,0.00019165134,0.000018307017,0.00017052137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009079846,0.00011665879,0.00039864532,0.00004831271,0.0003819897,0.00027167285,0.00052576186,0.00016434885,0.0005506506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014131276,0.00012912425,0.00010931568,0.000022619295,0.00025821652,0.0019237318,0.00011894328,0.00034909876,0.00003087016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096974174,0.000046748486,0.0031804307,0.0000071375916,0.000038486225,0.00001266412,0.0042306455,0.000040013867,0.000008573301,0.99086785,0.00058898,0.00088148436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014947364,0.00018878699,0.008924181,0.000039675087,0.000017389932,0.00013335774,0.015183214,0.00034357974,0.000022954007,0.0342306,0.93903583,0.000385673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07349866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6387255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95663726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022844676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022087537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.932671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042851964","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0035","title":"Constitutional rights in the balance: Modern exclusionary rules and the toleration of police lawlessness in the search for truth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawlessness; Discretion; Exclusionary rule; Political science; Law; Balance (ability); Human rights; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04441986453828719,"score_gpt":0.2839734639625264,"score_spread":0.23955359942423918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042851964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8555313,0.00062690955,0.0011941047,0.002796833,0.000118864875,0.0003349237,0.000019412919,0.0000026566115,0.13937505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995201,0.00014566383,0.00021987781,0.000041946423,0.000048356622,2.0455053e-7,6.6552803e-7,4.4186993e-7,0.000022713533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991709,0.0003362405,0.00008752164,0.000055220753,0.00025290487,0.00009719256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937165,0.00040141123,0.00006245317,0.00005805303,0.000086311535,0.000020114794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014514383,0.000035652996,0.000084760286,0.000008405077,0.0008740545,0.00001743345,0.00034791793,0.00003203469,0.00006137676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013302337,0.000019977999,0.000038976144,0.00002397441,0.0013804054,0.0003500724,0.000027363854,0.00008284909,2.127337e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023556448,0.000038608632,0.0006511189,0.0000052197283,0.0000036933811,0.000002929204,0.1383717,0.000013760773,0.000004464973,0.8603787,0.000043068463,0.00025118838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005821201,0.00026647453,0.11650473,0.00037487914,0.00013047527,0.00010300288,0.6767231,0.0027162537,0.00005902965,0.15544169,0.041567862,0.0002912976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27573404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.486358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.704937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057913465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007483495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7290889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044511085","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1117-1","title":"AUTHORITY TO PROSCRIBE AND PUNISH INTERNATIONAL CRIMES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Jurisdiction; Dignity; Punishment (psychology); Law; Criminal law; Political science; International law; Criminal jurisdiction; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01117392381419972,"score_gpt":0.2494568161555595,"score_spread":0.2382828923413598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044511085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3032784,0.000049042534,0.00026282016,0.003692887,0.0005981891,0.00012360883,0.0000073753995,0.00001738872,0.6919703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791839,0.00003317513,0.0020235402,0.000106113876,0.00022670458,6.75484e-8,8.50715e-7,0.0000020428406,0.01842357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941957,0.000049580794,0.00007032091,0.000078098885,0.00027009405,0.00011234642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993889,0.000021014748,0.00005958093,0.00003922216,0.00033206854,0.0001592174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018583823,0.000043016065,0.00006998757,0.000017087725,0.0007574932,0.0000982808,0.00027440244,0.00003812356,0.006334973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017022265,0.000043987748,0.00003976201,0.000006445442,0.00017775329,0.0008166341,0.00005433553,0.00006816238,0.00002672828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012022957,0.00002466469,0.00032925786,0.0000010980823,0.000022378992,0.0000046245527,0.006555477,5.971758e-7,0.00005556962,0.98737687,0.00476279,0.00085466774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038570538,0.00007906374,0.024761695,0.000031589734,0.000016871962,0.000009475365,0.0063402015,0.000021422087,0.0000455694,0.0627221,0.9054486,0.00013765927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16116245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15283507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9246547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020317135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004761071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99457335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044755740","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.75","title":"RETHINKING THE DICEYAN DIALECTIC","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law; Constitution; Constitutional theory; Political science; Sovereignty; Parliament; Ideology; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03223350373744688,"score_gpt":0.23427174905547754,"score_spread":0.20203824531803066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044755740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06975555,0.001858343,0.0002558006,0.00332316,0.00038024902,0.000049624192,0.0000013563391,0.000016470578,0.92435944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969191,0.0020738116,0.00014675903,0.000087076936,0.00024316745,1.1715016e-8,8.474713e-8,8.9858423e-7,0.0005291169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994277,0.000099137134,0.000051499082,0.0000446626,0.00026321702,0.00011381794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966276,0.000071081326,0.00006894826,0.00003723458,0.00010875485,0.000051250718],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002744273,0.000032434913,0.00006834873,0.000004604069,0.005557493,0.000010196262,0.00021598124,0.000027267046,0.00048718075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040536837,0.000026528085,0.000069001966,0.000027000431,0.0011756677,0.0002417898,0.00003604706,0.00009506465,0.000006046182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002786372,0.000027182376,0.003708366,7.41315e-7,0.00006064436,0.000054791897,0.080875464,0.0000058913924,0.000018980609,0.91121435,0.0027462165,0.0012594914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039562993,0.000061356004,0.03140499,0.000035769357,0.00006341189,0.000060356346,0.044482466,0.0000032724836,0.00000800091,0.04885297,0.87449837,0.0001333954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37365347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5539768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92716354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000187906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013158502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99573714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044835123","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1117-3","title":"TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND CRIMINALIZATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Relation (database); Acknowledgement; Sociology; Computer security","score_opus":0.010797130379867416,"score_gpt":0.2385564415872736,"score_spread":0.2277593112074062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044835123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2981476,0.0003797721,0.0067375773,0.0042915684,0.0009528993,0.00027990644,0.0000062505133,0.000045741326,0.6891587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979632,0.00030863195,0.0006533847,0.000014973393,0.00036441587,4.416389e-8,6.223807e-7,0.0000012506678,0.0006934889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997077,0.00003615154,0.00004473778,0.000041752166,0.000106715845,0.00006293254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973005,0.000011165802,0.000056499666,0.00003119158,0.00009742953,0.00007366981],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000098933546,0.000022424956,0.000038761507,0.0000052641244,0.00074986595,0.000039429153,0.0000747261,0.000026776372,0.0009575172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000056899294,0.000024707022,0.000020804287,0.000010323589,0.000114061346,0.00058133824,0.000016437998,0.00003599826,0.0000052866667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001539635,0.00006110724,0.0019007784,0.0000060896623,0.000023059954,0.0000019155866,0.025682718,0.000007869309,0.000594124,0.9472193,0.010119583,0.014368035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025020872,0.0000306226,0.0098355375,0.00000833326,0.000022227889,0.0000025253414,0.014946924,0.00006053308,0.000017577815,0.0026360585,0.9721365,0.000052948577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30554697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11760999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96201694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010647523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027253182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045693014","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.231112","title":"COPYRIGHT ORIGINALITY AND JUDICIAL ORIGINALITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Originality; Paraphrase; Copyright law; Outcome (game theory); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual property; Linguistics; Philosophy; Economics; Creativity","score_opus":0.010730204917584035,"score_gpt":0.248677690112529,"score_spread":0.23794748519494496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045693014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2170715,0.0003329387,0.0010880285,0.0020785504,0.00047215063,0.0001419255,0.000004419587,0.000032208678,0.77877825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959256,0.00028507362,0.0022186427,0.000067876994,0.00018784794,3.8820804e-8,6.738217e-7,0.0000019415572,0.0013122846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917656,0.00017848477,0.000100997146,0.00009009295,0.0003030673,0.00015077168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930304,0.00004667336,0.00014104796,0.000073444266,0.00022282646,0.00021295268],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044403266,0.00005513262,0.0001226652,0.00001149393,0.0010443083,0.00006396015,0.00017826007,0.000068837515,0.008959621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000277714,0.00005432909,0.000052434058,0.00001727463,0.00050416647,0.0011082296,0.000030520474,0.00009328336,0.000026864542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008364965,0.00009507622,0.0053846915,0.000012261103,0.00003666221,0.000013453113,0.010982798,0.0000018549158,0.0004453864,0.93511283,0.041712027,0.0061193355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087528967,0.00007516951,0.019810654,0.00004234413,0.000032957825,0.000008827774,0.017341815,0.00005663001,0.000054184933,0.015783038,0.9457571,0.0001619992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43549657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14673202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91932976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019114256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008227249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99194634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045988882","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0006","title":"A New Approach to Old Cases: Reconsidering Statutes of Limitation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Principal (computer security); Maximization; Political science; Rules of evidence; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Economics; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.06766223257713491,"score_gpt":0.2926820225917903,"score_spread":0.2250197900146554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045988882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36283118,0.0010060398,0.09446109,0.0017772188,0.0004764829,0.00037307222,0.00001622416,0.00006832921,0.5389904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87087715,0.00017353032,0.12750159,0.00004134981,0.00006203528,1.8777705e-8,4.3153187e-7,0.000003895023,0.0013399979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926454,0.000053344273,0.00012837329,0.000100310295,0.00031782032,0.00013561634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922854,0.00011481741,0.0001713375,0.00008121094,0.00023255963,0.00017152542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037410462,0.000051568204,0.00013094688,0.000036497262,0.00038463867,0.00003190456,0.00025672137,0.000046471916,0.00032554934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002093973,0.000059893337,0.00006162146,0.00007092235,0.000089842644,0.0006589899,0.000038304,0.00006633333,0.000007377459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039709464,0.0003583185,0.00077888195,0.00007516057,0.00016189727,0.000109535074,0.34989023,0.00854192,0.0005452891,0.5511828,0.011647568,0.07631128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037213634,0.0006315505,0.006885782,0.000682912,0.00019404262,0.00017417596,0.50045645,0.000017162882,0.001149604,0.036083687,0.44932556,0.0006776703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07550656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16646004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53765035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031398196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035902066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048126926","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.411","title":"EQUALITY UNDER AND BEFORE THE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Anachronism; Normative; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Law and economics; Extant taxon; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07866532542565509,"score_gpt":0.29018785071594355,"score_spread":0.21152252529028848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048126926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012002126,0.00014762706,0.00017676158,0.0044212085,0.00010800418,0.000029898687,0.0000041794115,0.000008452981,0.9831017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986982,0.00006876797,0.00020360482,0.0004582116,0.000110493165,5.3534777e-9,1.0721172e-7,0.0000013483884,0.00045927436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993861,0.00018373465,0.00005618347,0.00005146887,0.00017610611,0.00014643017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996183,0.000049475566,0.00005043236,0.00006613825,0.000073942574,0.00014172471],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006336358,0.000036029287,0.00006666434,0.0000027113285,0.0014078723,0.000015855285,0.00021230229,0.00006971986,0.0008992404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016408632,0.000028939912,0.00004879419,0.000010174238,0.0014994283,0.0003575861,0.00004729671,0.00015432431,0.0000037111752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011773688,0.00001689486,0.00012335197,0.0000018261787,0.0000150169235,0.0000027888195,0.036744043,1.0572659e-7,0.0000010360671,0.9628414,0.00006657248,0.00017517536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021383024,0.00006537036,0.005312684,0.000012994238,0.000037909802,0.0000051537404,0.053963352,0.0000018798488,0.0000074660857,0.8460933,0.09422544,0.000060604518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.356604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6067353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98669606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009683834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003951195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050838610","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0031","title":"Is Formalism inevitable?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Scholarship; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.017879355690791746,"score_gpt":0.27723399539297183,"score_spread":0.2593546397021801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050838610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030718176,0.00023681315,0.003925599,0.0020098668,0.00010150116,0.000052565523,0.0000061530204,0.000014277657,0.96293503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941593,0.00027330077,0.0018605229,0.00014065315,0.00014871544,6.273382e-9,3.881677e-7,0.0000017842393,0.0034153427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952054,0.00001798768,0.0000716049,0.000047567177,0.00018238089,0.0001599457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995876,0.00002299159,0.000083954095,0.00006300349,0.00010975705,0.00013270581],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005149855,0.000031125255,0.000058945436,0.000008057834,0.0010219871,0.00002023215,0.00022957566,0.000042186446,0.0020675866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006385785,0.000034319502,0.00006341927,0.0000264675,0.00014082824,0.00053497107,0.0000333051,0.000071397,0.000012297493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022681324,0.000048736234,0.0010553331,0.0000028390145,0.000021374319,0.000010971013,0.02458707,0.0000023576754,0.000120648925,0.9562634,0.0077580824,0.010106456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016781849,0.000012936475,0.0024592583,0.0000056033045,0.000010132862,0.0000028749243,0.020951224,0.0000035291894,0.000050850143,0.0008799815,0.9754119,0.000043872496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1986249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42091504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020432033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000516836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052860973","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.29","title":"From Author's Right to Property Right","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Property rights; Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Intellectual property; Exclusive right; Copyright Act; Real property; Sociology; Philosophy; Copyright law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01654885660416777,"score_gpt":0.25808075067657127,"score_spread":0.2415318940724035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052860973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013007374,0.00027456446,0.0013484677,0.00253962,0.0006481931,0.000065872024,0.0000406592,0.00001810946,0.98205715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97765064,0.000032897005,0.0043165446,0.0002077101,0.0009547016,2.4952703e-8,0.0000017291969,0.0000025949084,0.016833158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991548,0.00013499007,0.00008165197,0.000068336165,0.00028537042,0.00027481865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.000050026298,0.00007926414,0.00007783599,0.00012835539,0.00047235293],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002694081,0.000059140435,0.00011637895,0.000010420003,0.0011288838,0.000020868449,0.0002714141,0.000054890774,0.009664838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024028097,0.00004784905,0.0000758583,0.000025462374,0.00050246407,0.00063100166,0.000042599153,0.00008915396,0.00006498383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024016403,0.000057822726,0.0009585549,8.8157196e-7,0.00003613666,0.000012745243,0.008720276,0.0000024356325,0.000053773227,0.97079474,0.01870997,0.0006286662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011516097,0.00002212432,0.0007614603,0.000013383751,0.00002773242,0.000004131366,0.005994778,7.65137e-7,0.000037182795,0.00035234104,0.9925868,0.00008417163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4091597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12959492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042073408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032613822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99124044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056240794","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0000","title":"Investment Rules and the Denial of Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Investment (military); Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.013901353388218489,"score_gpt":0.1779326313506829,"score_spread":0.16403127796246442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056240794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92931396,0.0007727383,0.000042967382,0.00060797844,0.0004468868,0.00008995855,0.000007825967,0.00000563657,0.06871208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985565,0.00026726344,0.00026597304,0.00032969582,0.0004848613,5.0171305e-8,8.7162937e-7,0.000002972678,0.000091817135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996878,0.0000045377838,0.00007088125,0.000049916107,0.000113581096,0.00007326803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996069,0.0000134208685,0.00021986448,0.00006777819,0.00008297852,0.000009077745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015488155,0.00004761906,0.00010615197,0.0000096694985,0.00018225564,0.00002401348,0.00016195548,0.000027209631,0.00022448652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015483974,0.00003704653,0.000049028316,0.000013466406,0.00028489364,0.00074357673,0.00008800229,0.000073735755,0.0000028660402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016270437,0.000022022701,0.0016998033,0.000021470929,0.00001654341,0.0000097432,0.0009389398,1.4841847e-7,0.00019746188,0.99242556,0.0010582559,0.003447361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049426886,0.00003119664,0.18036726,0.000068095236,0.00015833262,0.000025072755,0.0030833257,0.00019621894,0.00005633312,0.017185474,0.79368114,0.00020483608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06196855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049255103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97524005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011091912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063678817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9680935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056543025","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0010","title":"Recognizing Quebec in the Constitution of Canada: Using the Bilateral Constitutional Amendment Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; French; Political science; Negotiation; Constitutional law; Constitutional amendment; Population; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.023199667368727937,"score_gpt":0.21659417120346544,"score_spread":0.1933945038347375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056543025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71187276,0.00094435137,0.00033652293,0.0019091846,0.000536225,0.00020687447,0.00003438098,0.000004562582,0.28415516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993964,0.00012066366,0.000055422857,0.00005762811,0.00004630045,2.3635057e-8,4.6119575e-7,4.929862e-7,0.0003226047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934685,0.00011285171,0.000092821574,0.000044947585,0.00029174922,0.00011079774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965334,0.000030848187,0.0001199143,0.000040506948,0.00010944315,0.000045951274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003407652,0.000030109139,0.00007119249,0.000026500027,0.002350996,0.000021887294,0.00020198984,0.000025372092,0.00033897924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000179212,0.000027816606,0.00003586035,0.000044426964,0.00250605,0.00030437726,0.000008646468,0.000091311515,1.8936095e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094190036,0.00008702707,0.0041034343,0.000022230774,0.000069117596,0.00034102457,0.13626605,0.0019637013,0.00013461015,0.84757334,0.008557779,0.0007874995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007354748,0.000025393572,0.005516107,0.00012669037,0.000053299133,0.000198248,0.17961466,0.000065889086,0.000019016188,0.00036072734,0.8131285,0.00015599588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99969155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8472126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032330998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069156443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059400667","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2873","title":"The importance of being earnest: Two notions of internalization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Sanctions; Preference; Social psychology; Internalization; Opposition (politics); Incentive; Perception; Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.026071572934634694,"score_gpt":0.20431550783055463,"score_spread":0.17824393489591994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059400667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3523566,0.010396094,0.02245774,0.0009115455,0.0006308298,0.00008443446,0.000057740024,0.0000071524664,0.61309785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988817,0.00038816527,0.00031824087,0.000009688421,0.000027149204,1.9132395e-8,6.0601093e-7,0.0000012128728,0.0003732228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996706,0.000007721132,0.00018447413,0.00004540574,0.00003776145,0.000054036613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940455,0.000017070759,0.0003565406,0.000057478886,0.00013406412,0.000030269443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022072493,0.000031579555,0.00011711846,0.0000114812565,0.00016833736,0.0000061565183,0.00014032297,0.000014120911,0.00008617372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029198009,0.000029620476,0.00006493286,0.000021719527,0.00017072688,0.00023246052,0.000041997737,0.000038536866,0.0000030132874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020522146,0.000020763477,0.09255333,0.0000029528444,0.00005094206,0.0000012622878,0.0007438733,0.00012865699,0.000005771719,0.9061259,0.00020526747,0.00014073969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041769054,0.00041522534,0.14411514,0.00018618254,0.00008814438,0.00005855039,0.010800453,0.0013101916,0.00028892266,0.26560742,0.5725651,0.0003877962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014132918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02045133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6465251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009915764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021767893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060105243","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0014","title":"Private Law and Public Right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Canada Council for the Arts","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Slavic languages; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Classics; Law; History; Art history","score_opus":0.02653600188505005,"score_gpt":0.2331907195830554,"score_spread":0.20665471769800536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060105243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033522338,0.00014742279,0.0003215694,0.0006768405,0.000047410424,0.00004330657,0.0000034356005,0.000013179792,0.9652245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678475,0.0002739386,0.0021003631,0.00006960508,0.000050699677,1.8452797e-8,2.522757e-7,0.0000016742058,0.0007186963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960685,0.000044061853,0.00005234429,0.00005968977,0.00011485211,0.00012220259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996298,0.000011127661,0.000071598515,0.00006342345,0.000069188325,0.00015488609],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018042397,0.0000324486,0.00005937299,0.0000055181936,0.0011431024,0.00003038293,0.00021075369,0.00003598967,0.002199542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004446704,0.000033052595,0.00003477165,0.000015916317,0.00039006872,0.00060891575,0.00005079899,0.00006208979,0.000006386233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004451812,0.000027362265,0.00047746248,9.704557e-7,0.0000110229175,0.000004010748,0.005632473,3.7105576e-8,0.00002048216,0.9931627,0.00019447177,0.0004645623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017228705,0.00001916863,0.002190022,0.0000045345064,0.000012035116,0.000003844001,0.0055038063,0.0000023075086,0.00002338053,0.0073636537,0.98465395,0.000051032224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20731443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46940053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033112436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060291855","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0013","title":"Ernie's Three Worlds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035658198521737815,"score_gpt":0.24481946985963499,"score_spread":0.20916127133789716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060291855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01863964,0.00013995914,0.0015058166,0.00039645442,0.00008683474,0.000043255623,0.0000031717314,0.00001589008,0.97916895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400306,0.00016019875,0.002984895,0.000028046099,0.00009602806,1.8462936e-8,2.1710703e-7,0.0000020645007,0.0027254515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959326,0.000030995772,0.00005545966,0.000054685814,0.00014696996,0.000118656244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996297,0.000011409661,0.00007966481,0.00007722962,0.00008412681,0.00011786572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020050012,0.000032502285,0.000060693677,0.0000063438624,0.00086849293,0.0000136533745,0.00031187435,0.00003493187,0.0054911915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004898101,0.000035206285,0.00006538049,0.000020526024,0.00021170905,0.00036434754,0.000038615017,0.00007275022,0.000024761352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016355816,0.000050557926,0.0023674236,0.0000010269875,0.000019166218,0.000007772847,0.015298426,8.134782e-7,0.000021205151,0.97650725,0.0012571557,0.004452842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020289094,0.000026511927,0.015406624,0.000008303137,0.000021283666,0.0000025256381,0.011140871,0.000005756798,0.00001632476,0.005542297,0.96755755,0.00006907517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2977756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7502186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014038943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059346905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99541795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061494529","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.1","title":"ONCE MORE INTO THE FRAY: CHALLENGES FOR LEGAL POSITIVISM","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.028825019273952368,"score_gpt":0.2572214584636875,"score_spread":0.22839643918973512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061494529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07201466,0.021410037,0.002227802,0.042144805,0.0006269628,0.00024479665,0.000011006116,0.000034367324,0.86128557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916661,0.0068397042,0.0005674389,0.00010598089,0.00031731057,8.86278e-8,2.4689749e-7,0.000001466879,0.0005016903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994735,0.000052344254,0.000055283286,0.000065309476,0.00022441246,0.00012912629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999586,0.00008084145,0.000066762106,0.000039962146,0.00016992008,0.000056529207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021425255,0.00004516795,0.00009209454,0.000005349005,0.004051209,0.000009937218,0.00021986404,0.000034587632,0.00007623811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023945542,0.000037525453,0.00009406145,0.000014169844,0.0010777281,0.00033173812,0.000036545785,0.00006685713,0.0000018817343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054523334,0.00003462389,0.0001747228,0.0000019116815,0.0000711403,0.000025927311,0.07178988,0.00000689309,0.000020399864,0.9182692,0.0012413585,0.008309379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031203456,0.00006986794,0.008022541,0.000023741533,0.000030615174,0.000016486885,0.09208778,0.0000057640464,0.000010512825,0.005532461,0.89380455,0.00008363769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23624626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39164692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018048065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013240607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068203766","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.105","title":"TAKING BRITAIN'S HUMAN RIGHTS ACT SERIOUSLY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Sovereignty; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law and economics; Right to property; Wonder; Sociology; International human rights law; Coalition government; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042123605801952624,"score_gpt":0.28746042997400234,"score_spread":0.24533682417204972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068203766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15245543,0.00009387468,0.00006275961,0.0009812431,0.0001391404,0.000033264227,0.0000028679553,0.000023438608,0.846208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794257,0.00006029719,0.00033536568,0.00008411044,0.00033452452,5.8852896e-9,4.793387e-7,0.0000026176247,0.0012400572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990823,0.00015494024,0.000089704394,0.000082527156,0.00033393933,0.0002565464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999365,0.00005563484,0.00012342122,0.00007653062,0.00013585055,0.00024359084],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032101877,0.000058378486,0.0001238249,0.000012329488,0.004762631,0.000018888373,0.0003217674,0.00010909725,0.0015626762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025802308,0.00006556441,0.00011385336,0.000021942227,0.00088812667,0.00063735305,0.000036571673,0.00022783411,0.000010430335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015784644,0.000055336877,0.00030828148,0.0000029391113,0.000025297964,0.00018513328,0.015836837,0.0000020589061,0.000030539253,0.9827756,0.000627779,0.00013439922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012998739,0.00019812994,0.012512554,0.000085707725,0.00006231903,0.00011220729,0.0077742385,0.0000062729323,0.00006246073,0.1711205,0.80641747,0.00034830856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39938694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44026107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034946742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009218722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069530579","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.377","title":"NAZI LAW AND THE CONCEPT OF COMMUNITY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Nazi Germany; Power (physics); Law; Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); World War II; Rule of law; Politics; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.024751558967417382,"score_gpt":0.17931802139015493,"score_spread":0.15456646242273755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069530579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058219977,0.000858574,0.000047105983,0.0003963354,0.0001204239,0.00003778201,0.00003148713,0.0000068557583,0.94028145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959004,0.0000750499,0.000027898226,0.0002287998,0.000057343874,1.04926e-8,0.000001105368,0.0000019704526,0.0037074075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995454,0.00015166124,0.00010000947,0.000026234715,0.000100428195,0.00007626054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955714,0.00010990755,0.000085528496,0.00008639483,0.00009803723,0.000062987616],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000116760726,0.000047307214,0.00015433395,0.000003965408,0.0013087719,0.0000081872295,0.00017635133,0.000020582997,0.00094758876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005653735,0.00003427791,0.00007921634,0.0000029873152,0.0028491803,0.00022166558,0.000049577528,0.00016238945,0.0000012452439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006995241,0.00004109816,0.000008297585,0.0000040982864,0.00002814619,0.0000051188313,0.05014212,6.929556e-7,0.0000016185036,0.94856215,0.0009929994,0.00014368434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016506406,0.00017776473,0.00015368681,0.000017117754,0.00004255066,0.00003510379,0.029269125,0.00004571707,0.000006439954,0.009433094,0.9590877,0.000081014965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18516295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09988505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004632944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014508933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069585775","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614-03ra","title":"List and Pettit on group agency and group responsibility","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Group (periodic table); Criminal liability; Liability; Law and economics; Political science; Criminal responsibility; Sociology; Law; Criminal law; Social science","score_opus":0.012579742963598714,"score_gpt":0.2079142936178357,"score_spread":0.195334550654237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069585775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95970297,0.00008896698,0.00030298368,0.0007382465,0.00003440699,0.000026020994,0.0000014533191,0.0000069808902,0.039097976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799514,0.00013549105,0.0009202852,0.00044558197,0.000013599828,1.3289117e-8,6.229527e-7,0.0000017018987,0.00048757103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999488,0.00012868954,0.00006979106,0.00012719767,0.000101448495,0.00008487198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996721,0.00006031923,0.00006868859,0.00009728412,0.000007772528,0.00009381144],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031098202,0.000055151846,0.000089148394,0.000008319447,0.0003596713,0.000011075773,0.00010076073,0.000043065687,0.0026337446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029334578,0.000054897617,0.000029684303,0.000012073762,0.0003929063,0.0003219453,0.000079205674,0.0000818976,0.000008509557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010036093,0.00037994108,0.78822637,0.000026943393,0.000100044395,0.00006138473,0.0036835235,0.000020198002,0.006686298,0.12485215,0.0104336105,0.06452594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040375115,0.00017935877,0.93240017,0.000009013914,0.000028371713,0.000024427074,0.0004250748,0.00010010307,0.000012880482,0.0011869044,0.06515936,0.00007056258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012705633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04980328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14417385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007391603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024992733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071745665","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0045","title":"Person, place, or thing?: Property and the structuring of social relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Property rights; Intuition; Structuring; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01396040738108468,"score_gpt":0.2380048575908833,"score_spread":0.22404445020979863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071745665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44463512,0.000068456364,0.0001830567,0.008439128,0.00013746157,0.00019063239,0.0000135368555,0.000014243572,0.54631835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943316,0.000036855923,0.000988478,0.000013981687,0.00009896553,3.5704915e-8,1.8862548e-7,0.0000015703804,0.0045283204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996231,0.000059017548,0.00005980293,0.000046186324,0.00013861194,0.00007327312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996419,0.000057091376,0.000120195466,0.000045999153,0.000090696245,0.00004410491],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003577417,0.000029855846,0.00007275044,0.0000053574904,0.0019228865,0.000024739595,0.00018566998,0.00004396525,0.0009377296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003262863,0.000017878498,0.00004491987,0.000019246885,0.00068059785,0.00028535383,0.00003319486,0.0001591467,6.662944e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009458177,0.000015155305,0.00037083856,0.0000034031184,0.00002605232,8.7479214e-7,0.0954606,0.0000035737849,0.0001864425,0.9016161,0.00082962215,0.001392758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00174806,0.00003160014,0.012727269,0.000013480618,0.00008524245,0.000012456205,0.14843765,0.00017770346,0.00002640306,0.0017675064,0.834864,0.000108625034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07388999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3291917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044321634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009553435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072706969","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.109","title":"DEMOCRATIC OBJECTIONS TO STRUCTURAL JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE JUDICIAL ROLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Federalism; Law; Judicial activism; Political science; Constitution; Judicial independence; Separation of powers; Democracy; Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.007300103575219185,"score_gpt":0.24305011294563528,"score_spread":0.2357500093704161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072706969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03755223,0.009220584,0.00013827583,0.017507995,0.0010879149,0.0005041147,0.000029104625,0.000020739124,0.93393904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970231,0.001577023,0.00023849214,0.0007950681,0.00030200605,2.7564985e-7,5.5796136e-7,0.000001126051,0.00006236728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992218,0.00012520597,0.00013974738,0.00009403884,0.0002554023,0.00016382537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999505,0.000090894966,0.00008398812,0.0000486035,0.00016112678,0.0001104072],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051604176,0.00006693283,0.0002046866,0.000014054641,0.0027599933,0.000024584955,0.00019322384,0.000047609556,0.00055651093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113231144,0.000056049572,0.00007135441,0.00006352311,0.004205173,0.00029684612,0.00006640484,0.00022156649,0.000004280392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045475368,0.000010306204,0.0005399073,0.000003181437,0.000025315614,0.0000046034093,0.0018750813,0.000003539376,0.000019449159,0.99652386,0.00046443223,0.00048486725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037180944,0.00012256127,0.028597336,0.0004725888,0.00056702975,0.00015767511,0.026178624,0.000020800857,0.000009707395,0.4190515,0.52059275,0.0005113486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34341288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8937054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95947087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012621112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023157994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074105530","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1119","title":"EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE IN CYBERSPACE? BODIN, SCHMITT, GROTIUS IN CYBERSPACE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Extraterritoriality; Law; International law; Global commons; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; The Internet","score_opus":0.008344743393117108,"score_gpt":0.24660782111064702,"score_spread":0.23826307771752991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074105530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35079643,0.00010571872,0.00028732963,0.001505921,0.0011244755,0.00023505121,0.0000039254874,0.000020886198,0.6459203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967024,0.00010427912,0.00060398993,0.000087420376,0.00039910624,2.1036094e-7,4.7955166e-7,0.0000035945468,0.0020985377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874276,0.00032354717,0.0001387539,0.00013923903,0.0002513077,0.00040439182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934125,0.00009494476,0.00007847339,0.0000914059,0.0001019405,0.00029198322],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006067934,0.00008640531,0.00018954101,0.000054296972,0.00039562897,0.000035275934,0.00028014896,0.00019416818,0.0022092038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083451094,0.00009955046,0.00007520312,0.00006670356,0.00030184985,0.000991271,0.00005383805,0.00026198264,0.00004074678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105191204,0.00006627838,0.002825685,0.0000022735821,0.000013857091,0.000037287467,0.013281913,0.000044390585,0.000043671447,0.981781,0.0013671432,0.0004312874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008462459,0.0008674389,0.16160446,0.00039089395,0.00007932958,0.00004251151,0.22425963,0.00023728874,0.00026234155,0.29447344,0.3080815,0.0012387026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41878447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3195043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6873076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009934134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012903183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075608957","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0224","title":"Resourceful impacts: Harm and valuation of the sacred","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Valuation (finance); Adjudication; Prosperity; Context (archaeology); Damages; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Business; Geography; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.019097554529141848,"score_gpt":0.25372563051924807,"score_spread":0.2346280759901062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075608957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8713941,0.002153463,0.00024252682,0.0014671785,0.00014981104,0.00009615037,0.0000061206906,0.000005129461,0.12448551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996685,0.0026068115,0.00021869509,0.000096383315,0.000054819968,7.2308257e-9,1.4478316e-7,0.000001237589,0.00033685414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945515,0.00015829846,0.00006482602,0.000036298447,0.00019990215,0.00008549605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996796,0.00005060568,0.00012458081,0.000048957063,0.000027420583,0.000068839894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049982656,0.000026023316,0.00006486003,0.0000047586864,0.00068674696,0.0000088605675,0.00011948181,0.00003265299,0.00028980948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036859383,0.000022835487,0.000032312248,0.000009757224,0.0003475551,0.00021180774,0.000030134628,0.000051927025,6.671754e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037715686,0.0002656162,0.10922015,0.0004654681,0.00012595845,0.0000032655653,0.38820165,0.0001190654,0.0022837666,0.46749434,0.007161994,0.024281576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001028623,0.00017578535,0.36502498,0.00023701548,0.00012880712,0.000003979599,0.23464195,0.00008005656,0.00012699417,0.0021524585,0.39629078,0.00010857091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062037025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16611287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46534187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012652866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003096658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.944209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076505528","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0211","title":"Moral rightness and the significance of law: Why, how, and when mistake of law matters","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Culpability; Law; Action (physics); Criminal law; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of law; Strict liability; Liability; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.01804449367545182,"score_gpt":0.18566222737401747,"score_spread":0.16761773369856564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076505528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8706097,0.00085868407,0.00034157617,0.009901218,0.00026468243,0.00042675954,0.00006959544,0.000015521664,0.11751228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854136,0.00012421029,0.0003346732,0.00035566062,0.000017855464,7.261429e-8,1.6691928e-7,0.000003636523,0.0006223773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933165,0.000114871465,0.0001141538,0.00012218021,0.00019104546,0.00012611318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941534,0.000090027235,0.00021543694,0.00012594844,0.00007303363,0.00008019138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012351976,0.000080404796,0.00019864851,0.000009015878,0.00027531435,0.00003158335,0.00028097394,0.000033107153,0.00037568703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008131643,0.000058985977,0.000058665977,0.000012311236,0.001588025,0.0006204342,0.000069822476,0.000086094136,6.737778e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034335768,0.000119433644,0.00049272354,0.00013757142,0.000047297563,0.000032394615,0.0074750856,0.000014016631,0.13190596,0.8529317,0.005612458,0.00088800734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031861894,0.0019859811,0.025446046,0.0010712189,0.0007735604,0.00075391633,0.0228839,0.0020998942,0.33192196,0.14465252,0.43453628,0.0020128423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06757578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014454738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7082792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002422463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010590951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9386333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076998095","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0059","title":"Access to justice and beyond","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Tribunal; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.018811540854771994,"score_gpt":0.2066464900329916,"score_spread":0.1878349491782196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076998095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30869237,0.00055135676,0.0013012867,0.0007731994,0.0017743014,0.000105772706,0.00006775283,0.000011389918,0.6867226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976995,0.00028363237,0.0010265473,0.0002678969,0.00029929934,4.8166e-8,8.495213e-7,0.0000072086027,0.00041501375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942505,0.0000074235168,0.00022556106,0.00016091803,0.000022952554,0.00015809141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933136,0.000022501,0.00025973163,0.00013741835,0.000043538817,0.0002054616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033895785,0.00006325192,0.00025506178,0.000036288366,0.00032346926,0.00009337483,0.0003332894,0.0000768945,0.0014197528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002304807,0.00009793517,0.00006544937,0.000018828787,0.00011735728,0.0007985662,0.00010729328,0.0001262725,0.000056999874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044511842,0.000042123407,0.012938011,0.000023839306,0.000059424812,0.000010104652,0.0016843138,0.000013076053,0.00008437339,0.97903585,0.004829281,0.0012351121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018335372,0.00022521953,0.05680395,0.000025744932,0.000077850484,0.00009600597,0.0030033896,0.00028010152,0.000073300056,0.05954985,0.8774897,0.0005413377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030652719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09361914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.919486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009386681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013251764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078039457","doi":"10.2307/825939","title":"Rethinking the Process/Substance Distinction: Baker V. Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Human rights; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021476845913563917,"score_gpt":0.2455718296829147,"score_spread":0.22409498376935078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078039457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27136523,0.0016639527,0.00072644633,0.017562507,0.0009121231,0.000113032904,0.0000037862173,0.000025708021,0.70762724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966739,0.00040367333,0.00009509394,0.00011600529,0.00020047571,1.9239513e-8,2.0947998e-7,0.0000019274341,0.0025087101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991794,0.000085859334,0.00007452484,0.00007386785,0.0004189348,0.00016737562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945277,0.000067961126,0.000116031544,0.000077373676,0.00018917712,0.00009670474],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040212562,0.000046429057,0.00007324257,0.000002980114,0.0022896554,0.000032348824,0.0003507218,0.000030793497,0.001645274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030554627,0.00004011147,0.000041289553,0.000037808608,0.00026062614,0.0004897381,0.000013896528,0.00013038071,0.000001546191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078884803,0.0001600424,0.042495422,0.00006335762,0.00019351783,0.0012651175,0.33315855,0.0004216522,0.00007356201,0.49263892,0.09999341,0.028747631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117507574,0.000016764589,0.0040631336,0.000050681112,0.000027825852,0.000035287565,0.04486956,0.00001219527,0.0000049087002,0.0016850495,0.9490416,0.00007545631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97985023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8490482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000529593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035305237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079831649","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2419","title":"Blaming the victim: Canadian law, causation, and residential schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Blame; Tort; Notice; Law; Damages; Prison; Supreme court; Criminology; Political science; Attendance; Estate; Sociology; Liability; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.005574235348561375,"score_gpt":0.20721737809004726,"score_spread":0.20164314274148587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079831649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4184553,0.0002870326,0.00028977278,0.0047987346,0.00038762303,0.000119458455,0.0000060050734,0.000017715065,0.57563835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857014,0.00025247122,0.00018557627,0.00026532056,0.00028659863,1.3820259e-8,6.1021046e-7,0.0000031587688,0.00043609377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921185,0.00019638943,0.000092760674,0.000082542014,0.00021008012,0.00020640221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937576,0.00005791827,0.00009956754,0.00009587483,0.00012848173,0.00024241213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068754266,0.00005456486,0.00009487146,0.00001674575,0.0028163367,0.00010353968,0.00026689254,0.000060435883,0.0006745087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005008113,0.000051069434,0.00004588446,0.000022974657,0.00034569734,0.0005291858,0.000023303373,0.00013693287,0.000006307356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026140147,0.000012040381,0.013531115,0.000003991219,0.000068871246,0.00001936596,0.057348203,0.000019117277,0.000083870305,0.9221467,0.0049034045,0.0018372103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006656584,0.00004752648,0.038047656,0.000058455862,0.00009297803,0.00001952018,0.0858486,0.00005974485,0.000050715225,0.0029282004,0.87199646,0.00018449014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97423863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99842924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023952316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017301211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079936065","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0010","title":"The Impact of Hot Issue Markets and Noise Traders on Stock Exchange Listing Standards","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Stock exchange; Business; Capital market; Mandate; Incentive; Public interest; Market maker; Primary market; Accounting; Finance; Economics; Stock market; Corporate governance; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.015397347305828554,"score_gpt":0.2118321612226256,"score_spread":0.19643481391679704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079936065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5256264,0.0076091485,0.00010296731,0.00023367596,0.00016830115,0.00010770057,0.00021604759,0.000006507692,0.4659292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687874,0.0020991755,0.00013775157,0.000010574829,0.00007739983,4.67077e-8,0.0000012851302,0.00000560555,0.0007894222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945617,0.000021757813,0.00020339662,0.000102953345,0.00005875756,0.00015696148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939215,0.00005083743,0.00035777834,0.00009739293,0.000052350417,0.00004946676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047584352,0.00008810868,0.00021177252,0.000022720018,0.00039122775,0.00004125869,0.00014325487,0.00004647858,0.0005529488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022401713,0.00007851209,0.000120082004,0.000023084867,0.0001844769,0.00029983604,0.000024902562,0.00008535116,9.320321e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024472927,0.0004315345,0.03529184,0.00014338299,0.00041019786,0.00005026689,0.0040017394,0.00031579184,0.00014111813,0.8659412,0.0671823,0.023643317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019132326,0.0010605487,0.7472223,0.000104463135,0.000022205557,0.000016055117,0.0018367368,0.0006361727,0.000033335426,0.009351433,0.23751526,0.0002882567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03827408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069442648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8565898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027608243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003072869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080641437","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0020","title":"Errors of fact and law: Race, space, and hockey in Christie v York","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Dissent; Law; Economic Justice; Space (punctuation); Race (biology); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Politics; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009558075751939552,"score_gpt":0.20340499353663485,"score_spread":0.19384691778469532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080641437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63108736,0.010278002,0.000008880321,0.0003431949,0.00023732762,0.00007588686,0.000014976788,0.0000067507704,0.35794762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963067,0.0021582088,0.00027145527,0.000013265822,0.000049741553,1.0172257e-8,2.4142233e-7,0.0000018193676,0.0011985514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995486,0.000066127854,0.00006458841,0.000048424117,0.00013105046,0.00014117351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996215,0.000023691033,0.0000922243,0.000039262308,0.000030225921,0.00019309961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024492142,0.000035622517,0.00011872821,0.000049604587,0.0005791873,0.000030721374,0.00008506999,0.000054955344,0.0006589152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011935662,0.00004925102,0.000030880805,0.000023799334,0.00074219727,0.0006383828,0.000023364259,0.00007918085,0.0000011260877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019369597,0.0002796059,0.07184171,0.00007824409,0.00009874233,0.000054032193,0.25677922,0.0000059573426,0.00016959272,0.62989324,0.024725987,0.01587997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039509122,0.00003612314,0.038459882,0.000040672327,0.000021775604,0.00000511084,0.04065166,0.0000014406927,0.0000031076959,0.0001580303,0.920155,0.00007209188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9612665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99641997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.895429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004176937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092618844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72146595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082217453","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0018","title":"Willis, 'Theology,' and the Rule of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Politics; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.008257648076468992,"score_gpt":0.23484182789019992,"score_spread":0.2265841798137309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082217453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00891189,0.0009812124,0.00017158894,0.0036301822,0.000058225913,0.000030104204,0.000009050108,0.000003573739,0.98620415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964108,0.0005617607,0.001011337,0.00025260233,0.00012003894,6.966513e-9,2.3118645e-7,8.562375e-7,0.0016423855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995647,0.00011457159,0.00006405894,0.000036061334,0.00012603446,0.00009459576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959004,0.00011625967,0.00009731304,0.00004356555,0.00008798098,0.000064865664],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003063878,0.000030063648,0.00009599277,0.000003826185,0.00071188214,0.000006693118,0.00015413777,0.000030253486,0.00075068505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015262836,0.000024544705,0.000050644197,0.000008186074,0.004639807,0.00021576638,0.000027449241,0.00005827312,0.0000013990424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033381486,0.000011016901,0.00013763957,9.172931e-7,0.000018964518,0.0000012643918,0.0040417165,0.000006638395,0.0000036726346,0.9950696,0.0002537347,0.00042145627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048527992,0.000017230203,0.00023534085,0.0000068769086,0.000029318466,0.000010723465,0.004558565,0.000004797017,0.000006820615,0.0038124293,0.99079895,0.000033666885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19871481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16703129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072758325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014847764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083022284","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0004","title":"Combating Terrorist Financing: Is Canada’s Legal Regime Effective?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Commission; Money laundering; Convention; Political science; Finance; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Business; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.01222665008477198,"score_gpt":0.20959969081581256,"score_spread":0.1973730407310406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083022284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07786702,0.0004210938,0.00010329472,0.005698128,0.00051165593,0.00013778036,0.00008746341,0.000013680781,0.9151599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991522,0.000060766968,0.00031634126,0.00057673507,0.00013226319,2.3712882e-8,2.0806856e-7,0.0000034305556,0.007388207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925846,0.00009018569,0.00008176668,0.00008928587,0.00024394353,0.00023634803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993963,0.000035843816,0.00018666084,0.00008482574,0.00008949565,0.00020683765],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002414914,0.000061517116,0.00012145056,0.000008671717,0.0010595734,0.000016518654,0.00029196453,0.000048286925,0.0011622285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041718362,0.000075078744,0.00006669581,0.00002552207,0.00021057222,0.00044146148,0.000026044023,0.00012262705,0.000002219434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001294251,0.000061961626,0.0039702132,0.000017920533,0.00010290861,0.0004389542,0.11734232,0.000002081414,0.000030304429,0.3571926,0.512714,0.007997295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028336092,0.000043580465,0.016799886,0.000037916965,0.000016843082,0.0000116572655,0.0077326065,0.0000037552977,0.00006170494,0.00022045383,0.97468615,0.00010209324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.913655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001200583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009296789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083205220","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614ra","title":"Proportionality and justification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Legitimacy; Deliberation; Political science; Law and economics; Supreme court; Accountability; Duty; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.016665978894505853,"score_gpt":0.2422938532457298,"score_spread":0.22562787435122394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083205220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07068454,0.0006083646,0.0028823542,0.0033408536,0.00019673824,0.000057676996,0.0000030825338,0.000015168943,0.9222112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891186,0.00033302727,0.00039859692,0.0000254375,0.00010940454,1.0773043e-8,3.4556354e-7,4.2593126e-7,0.00022087019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965763,0.00005590267,0.000044475506,0.000042396605,0.00014333459,0.000056247198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972206,0.000020683698,0.000061700004,0.000021114374,0.00012338108,0.000051054645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033292937,0.00002076181,0.000048698876,0.000003484672,0.0011726134,0.0000095545065,0.000058873244,0.000020200225,0.00024906127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034020424,0.00002155434,0.000021312555,0.000009638191,0.00052578666,0.00019817369,0.000015226919,0.000029340164,0.000002179777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008914164,0.000012961339,0.0022513214,0.0000011570066,0.000009211852,5.192948e-7,0.0016212264,0.0000010057067,0.000019713645,0.99001926,0.00030798916,0.005746746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023934062,0.000033109718,0.09093968,0.00001637218,0.000035165864,0.00000409079,0.013134671,0.000011013486,0.0000076442775,0.04371521,0.8517903,0.00007342099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13133588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2027298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007759887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041090545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9018913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083521428","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0004","title":"The Rule of Law as Liberal Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitutionalism; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Legitimacy; Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Rule of law; Philosophy of law; Politics; Political science; Originalism; Democracy; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Liberal democracy; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010948889504164151,"score_gpt":0.23674918367656606,"score_spread":0.2258002941724019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083521428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02317349,0.0014606554,0.000035556062,0.001468016,0.00023701704,0.00002896582,0.0000039236,0.0000060604757,0.9735863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996824,0.0005429792,0.00015554402,0.000054086657,0.00024153062,1.2308709e-8,2.3712514e-7,9.518463e-7,0.002180631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945843,0.00005527856,0.000076985874,0.000040905183,0.0002508429,0.000117566145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958634,0.00007605186,0.00010067806,0.000035316025,0.00016890615,0.000032702243],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021621512,0.00003421095,0.000077118035,0.0000032649157,0.002672596,0.000016545224,0.00020113279,0.000028005734,0.0002608917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014202036,0.000028792738,0.00007236661,0.000016802556,0.0009841357,0.00022082978,0.000036636287,0.0000534837,0.0000058962523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002945498,0.00002337031,0.00014318642,0.0000010598825,0.000021433329,0.0000058206333,0.0017907493,0.000008591545,0.000024258652,0.99593246,0.001611726,0.00040788102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002506526,0.000038131515,0.0027046273,0.000017682047,0.000078300975,0.00000419196,0.015877208,0.0000012748244,0.000031544805,0.078754,0.90218383,0.00005854894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6344182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.619394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011794412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008941989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087746324","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0026","title":"Basic rights and substantive criminal law: The Incest Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Law; Substantive law; Criminology; Criminal procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.04666004204695751,"score_gpt":0.25993476191343245,"score_spread":0.21327471986647495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087746324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57437915,0.00072886894,0.00006625101,0.00033264465,0.00017586703,0.000067952016,0.0000047270764,0.000010776353,0.4242338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878836,0.00020997575,0.00039135982,0.000045509343,0.000083121085,2.00013e-8,1.1147964e-7,0.0000019357444,0.0004796044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992605,0.00017301022,0.00008174304,0.00009700033,0.00021018668,0.00017760303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994279,0.00008778324,0.00010930597,0.00008443472,0.00014266654,0.00014790428],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048516152,0.00006453914,0.00010230472,0.000007702583,0.0025907727,0.00003746626,0.00026343996,0.000046790126,0.001185564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000105209265,0.000051184554,0.000058862544,0.000020336767,0.0012005841,0.0008087866,0.000049763792,0.00012160124,0.000004978957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012048896,0.000041959906,0.00029822072,0.0000060731686,0.000026689273,0.0016379452,0.13955298,1.6441794e-7,0.00001197069,0.85667455,0.00063289964,0.0009960852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008093771,0.0003868163,0.0050591757,0.00012919714,0.00046824696,0.0023861104,0.4744795,0.000010996469,0.00018061513,0.016714962,0.49902216,0.0003528595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7628325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9290948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83995956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012360424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047206002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088944785","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0009","title":"The law of capture, Newfoundland-style","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Style (visual arts); Law; Corollary; Occupancy; Variety (cybernetics); Seal (emblem); Political science; Sociology; History; Archaeology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.006093123986782072,"score_gpt":0.18610896164325544,"score_spread":0.18001583765647336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088944785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010015278,0.0014931967,0.000026137168,0.0011854486,0.00034444543,0.0000623862,0.00000578543,0.0000060994,0.9868612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96914333,0.0010638542,0.00014581988,0.00007268426,0.000118942226,2.6703397e-8,3.7746875e-7,0.0000027196254,0.029452274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994771,0.000074489224,0.000071517745,0.000042441738,0.00020587415,0.00012861064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994832,0.000041790976,0.00011728726,0.00007630558,0.00015369183,0.00012769252],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021729317,0.000029494053,0.00007688211,0.000015065953,0.0023367456,0.00010478681,0.0003005529,0.00004418836,0.0039467923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011532727,0.000031161595,0.00008295019,0.000019762143,0.0011701345,0.00048371847,0.000020372365,0.00007793141,0.000021401704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014634528,0.000022861832,0.00018568628,0.0000039924566,0.00004019852,0.0000069867965,0.022668375,0.0000023610223,0.00003813175,0.9271517,0.04738931,0.002475765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014669957,0.000015271047,0.0012727254,0.000007514114,0.000013546415,0.0000022142578,0.02026983,0.0000016786223,7.135124e-7,0.0009821113,0.97725093,0.000036734687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99660087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99965674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.959128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073084654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019015375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089111058","doi":"10.2307/825935","title":"Why Regulators Turn to Tradeable Permits: A Canadian Case Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turn (biochemistry); Economics; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.025377538933273713,"score_gpt":0.2416104488927641,"score_spread":0.21623290995949038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089111058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42566535,0.00016913678,0.00001345095,0.0016916246,0.00023063162,0.00012808426,0.000009458667,0.000012458321,0.5720798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897951,0.00004429732,0.00011958117,0.0005639119,0.00013724902,2.1436787e-8,1.6105228e-7,0.0000046905557,0.009334985],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991413,0.00016633952,0.00009739365,0.00010040925,0.00028061587,0.00021397386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913806,0.000023226827,0.00006510943,0.0000844353,0.00016931139,0.00051988644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003117401,0.00006131303,0.00010071235,0.000038913287,0.0011809698,0.0000637418,0.00030461984,0.000033103075,0.0073301042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028898525,0.00006989027,0.00006925709,0.000042444637,0.00009150522,0.00057797413,0.000018718296,0.00010422198,0.000026709284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011359692,0.001070326,0.006020567,0.000007849113,0.0004691576,0.0346407,0.4163017,0.00016273063,0.00006754071,0.3293228,0.19859083,0.01323224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033926067,0.00013807885,0.00064622925,0.000011152287,0.000021434395,0.00017765856,0.06516237,0.000031618085,0.0000012294304,0.000013477819,0.93336964,0.00008788285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95557564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99642384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73477876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074073626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006613576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089711025","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0015","title":"Formalism in Music and Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Theoretical physics; Political science; Physics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.03416187840239202,"score_gpt":0.2359458338655684,"score_spread":0.20178395546317637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089711025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11810296,0.00012692771,0.00008562655,0.00020609266,0.00003616037,0.000039217746,0.0000021080868,0.000005358541,0.8813955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983583,0.00018650043,0.0009949302,0.0000496355,0.000029571938,1.6430297e-8,1.3392894e-7,0.0000010484518,0.00037988144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997155,0.00002856292,0.000047504873,0.000041376745,0.00007670824,0.00009034967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998023,0.000008903352,0.00004532667,0.00003875691,0.00003198804,0.00007271576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001843878,0.00002390149,0.000049985654,0.0000057220514,0.00046345463,0.000010649883,0.00012700158,0.000029560813,0.00086841854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000022469885,0.000026162854,0.000022811158,0.000013635316,0.00020717917,0.00047009793,0.000032882028,0.000055088152,0.0000022266854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007522479,0.000020662554,0.0005663376,0.0000010587289,0.0000034904065,0.0000050972044,0.030433957,2.5174674e-7,0.000012361045,0.96794003,0.000107588115,0.0009016364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054326246,0.000039256152,0.018337132,0.000017745835,0.000015031218,0.0000065691715,0.044472173,0.000012160646,0.000023813887,0.010171486,0.92626673,0.00009460966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5179338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84696174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95776856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008041928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023058736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9508574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092671075","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0007","title":"Language and Judgment's Reach: Reflecting on Limits on Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Proportionality (law); Constitution; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Legislature; Common law; Fidelity; Bill of rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.03164118550424202,"score_gpt":0.29693485752345006,"score_spread":0.26529367201920806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092671075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40631455,0.000088856475,0.000003512818,0.0005354412,0.00019980111,0.00002326913,0.0000016514261,0.000008347104,0.5928246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988528,0.00010867273,0.00017553201,0.000067389534,0.00023460617,1.291019e-8,2.056555e-7,0.00000101246,0.0005597973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953455,0.00004184845,0.00004542784,0.000071271366,0.00019839569,0.00010849674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971056,0.00005896019,0.00006134178,0.00003656694,0.000052790245,0.000079762285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021213859,0.00004284475,0.00007435476,0.000010944722,0.0018712741,0.000018604413,0.00009830038,0.000041661253,0.00027755435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002921357,0.00003994558,0.000034656096,0.000015147538,0.00031236565,0.00016103276,0.000017664857,0.00015151438,0.0000057655475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008214499,0.00005693124,0.00042174445,0.000001005376,0.000034354507,0.000039642804,0.016803931,9.016069e-7,0.0007898105,0.9749669,0.00072193664,0.0060807345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013513484,0.0005417443,0.019769643,0.00015685972,0.000086123044,0.000022726614,0.07837212,0.0000036126855,0.00074644625,0.017799163,0.88080084,0.00034934244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17253983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6348849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009086585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002838462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093143504","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.467","title":"ACADEMIC SCRIBBLERS AND DEFUNCT ECONOMISTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Economic Growth and Development","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Innovator; State (computer science); Institutional economics; Liberalization; New institutionalism; Coase theorem; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Market economy; Entrepreneurship; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Finance; Law; Transaction cost; Politics","score_opus":0.006765942145678583,"score_gpt":0.17460172609656088,"score_spread":0.1678357839508823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093143504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8608964,0.00042276343,0.01575672,0.0009419786,0.0009865032,0.000061543375,0.0000017523544,0.00003270694,0.12089965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736218,0.00015923535,0.025783148,0.000120317585,0.000040413543,1.30299e-8,2.0161242e-7,0.0000019124925,0.00027296777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958867,0.00001222238,0.00009475497,0.000119871256,0.00005145152,0.00013301369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954647,0.000022513816,0.00009834556,0.00011581262,0.000034186436,0.0001826644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020972684,0.00005750121,0.00009741161,0.000015860063,0.0002216032,0.00003384871,0.00045662987,0.000058902133,0.00018755179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000051778948,0.00006395677,0.000035702098,0.000008373173,0.000080143545,0.0009119795,0.00014831376,0.00019823202,0.0000100956495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056546,0.00004156492,0.03154829,0.000018045193,0.000105020095,0.000064303895,0.0044170804,0.000016750297,0.0020925303,0.8811198,0.0073372102,0.07318286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047224653,0.0002572762,0.25146034,0.000063445186,0.000042504475,0.0012356339,0.0019608096,0.004648159,0.001677823,0.019035602,0.7140062,0.00088974345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019918708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011245426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8620842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075346965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007320744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62752116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093184516","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0009","title":"Sexual Citizens: The Legal and Cultural Regulation of Sex and Belonging (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.008031324265683574,"score_gpt":0.24379840144105672,"score_spread":0.23576707717537315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093184516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419475,0.013754661,0.000010631581,0.0017341571,0.00014410993,0.00006980736,8.310121e-7,0.0000071057725,0.04233119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871927,0.01104147,0.00030802295,0.000025128362,0.000082592254,7.352894e-9,5.215554e-7,0.0000013808403,0.0013482138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958616,0.000074466974,0.00006820549,0.000051172196,0.00014217931,0.000077784694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996756,0.000039655344,0.00009988194,0.00004227684,0.00009037658,0.00005226697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038434163,0.000036660564,0.00009049524,0.0000057903735,0.00071592716,0.000016787326,0.000095478856,0.00005102069,0.0002628591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021572596,0.00002700174,0.000023334194,0.000018810048,0.00047536046,0.00029706655,0.00002656296,0.00012640265,3.0964245e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485489,0.00011648098,0.020534743,0.00023723574,0.00046946236,0.000041787065,0.5133244,0.000020477926,0.013355405,0.2337243,0.018784119,0.1992431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092670036,0.000126465,0.038193893,0.00039716886,0.00022988887,0.00011781046,0.33749363,0.00010739324,0.00016373902,0.00091167673,0.6211128,0.00021884126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025994707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033709638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60232866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019965239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020371184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98392266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094373958","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.0301-1","title":"SEX, LIES, AND HIV: <i>MABIOR</i> AND THE CONCEPT OF SEXUAL FRAUD","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Sexual assault; Test (biology); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Hiv test; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Poison control; Family medicine; Demography; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Epistemology; Population; Biology; Health services","score_opus":0.006032792113304776,"score_gpt":0.19912697218950715,"score_spread":0.19309418007620238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094373958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5269945,0.013909365,0.00013766375,0.0094447695,0.00028623216,0.0003997117,0.00003470786,0.000026820537,0.44876617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903833,0.00206496,0.00047633838,0.00017541178,0.00011790455,4.1641645e-8,5.533738e-7,0.0000021225935,0.0067793587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994351,0.00013831625,0.00007104044,0.00006482936,0.00018300301,0.00010768298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999565,0.00007794958,0.000112879374,0.000054200853,0.00010455991,0.00008541496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002921856,0.000047593898,0.00013205124,0.0000010680077,0.0008843318,0.000034151628,0.00016982749,0.00007772061,0.00089262857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013283895,0.000035173915,0.000036108762,0.000015193076,0.002000013,0.00041471998,0.000054285247,0.000105105886,0.0000010079668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007090546,0.00005694611,0.0017683331,0.000018093793,0.00017105366,0.000004198491,0.49944547,0.000003582537,0.0002802719,0.4417183,0.048983596,0.0074792425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017473516,0.000072501585,0.0012438671,0.000020435107,0.00007684034,0.000010277641,0.6038665,0.000011767462,0.00004496525,0.0024575812,0.3903442,0.00010367329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06494365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030687908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46338877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042088534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034149485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094997892","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0024","title":"My Continuing Legal Education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Nothing; Banner; Legal education; Law; Media studies; History; Political science; Sociology; Art history; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012600813934692104,"score_gpt":0.30020376384300207,"score_spread":0.28760294990831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094997892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024099434,0.00026311827,0.0002781138,0.026230557,0.0005676225,0.00004618344,0.0000011662958,0.000015245423,0.94849855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97658795,0.00017465463,0.004516082,0.00030123017,0.0005687201,2.6414298e-8,0.0000011602845,0.0000020041764,0.017848162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950117,0.000093282906,0.00008518289,0.000050797345,0.00017135589,0.00009823879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993287,0.000041483916,0.00015667765,0.000054689852,0.00032916066,0.00008929667],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003932675,0.000032265627,0.000053650812,0.000017768181,0.00075466564,0.00008540786,0.0001622221,0.000037859707,0.005565108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000770778,0.000039454284,0.00004063143,0.000042650827,0.00012005195,0.002524255,0.000010542827,0.00016074006,0.000027643797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015012137,0.00013371992,0.00024061132,0.0000013578892,0.000014223394,8.491753e-7,0.042029057,0.000005520127,0.00007556086,0.8551411,0.028517794,0.07382521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012020343,0.000009071108,0.0006428862,0.000010893723,0.000012438174,0.000005424945,0.05689343,0.0000039379966,0.000013678057,0.00017407569,0.9420713,0.000042614196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19176167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35150108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95248854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003769423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006601069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095259753","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.1","title":"Pandectism and the Gaian Classification of Things","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Medical and Health Sciences Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; German; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03745855982522201,"score_gpt":0.3026153306674386,"score_spread":0.2651567708422166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095259753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6394457,0.006746774,0.0022040205,0.017581148,0.00030158556,0.00031067827,0.0000017457119,0.000009042648,0.33339927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974978,0.0011426574,0.00060889614,0.000116118055,0.000060329825,1.5185538e-8,2.1615713e-7,8.477489e-7,0.0005731068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999441,0.00005497152,0.00007903992,0.00003480867,0.0002799099,0.000110261426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995058,0.00006534587,0.0000822237,0.000057758374,0.00008212345,0.00020672011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092908856,0.00002348341,0.000104989645,0.000009848015,0.00020644774,0.000002983829,0.000078525954,0.00002960942,0.00073271914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040560502,0.000014215249,0.00003266228,0.000017924493,0.0004907628,0.00023230494,0.000025482259,0.00012570857,0.0000013625909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040151663,0.00065959105,0.16050445,0.0006058079,0.00023201045,0.000025377443,0.088262334,5.816307e-7,0.005772935,0.53449994,0.009198333,0.1962235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068742116,0.00046805327,0.8388149,0.00021984828,0.00012369476,0.00034688963,0.02700609,0.0012761675,0.000126265,0.0009283333,0.12373455,0.00008096315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010642011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011969755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6783105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047967675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048678987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098201070","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2325","title":"The stripping of the trust: A study in legal evolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Liability; Economic Justice; Creditor; Business; Externality; Value (mathematics); Distributive property; Welfare; Stripping (fiber); Law and economics; Point (geometry); Inequality; Punitive damages; Service (business); Public economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Debt; Economics; Law; Finance; Microeconomics; Marketing","score_opus":0.010026889588759615,"score_gpt":0.24335590176580496,"score_spread":0.23332901217704535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098201070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8405874,0.000099840276,0.0004527329,0.0015280533,0.00012255182,0.00017348993,0.0000016792847,0.00000419614,0.1570301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991787,0.000026172049,0.000040465053,0.0000056314216,0.000047043584,3.9188485e-8,2.7552028e-8,8.861495e-7,0.00070100446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994026,0.00019441542,0.00008194749,0.00004159534,0.00019232731,0.00008714408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996352,0.000052047744,0.00012376462,0.000093064344,0.00006705382,0.000028848655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007157865,0.000024597302,0.000054601634,0.000004951105,0.0011898421,0.00001965053,0.0003708207,0.000019881414,0.000045231976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035195364,0.000017348042,0.00004906013,0.00004131327,0.00019034327,0.00020029652,0.00005232221,0.00008700098,5.3096323e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021050508,0.00010383607,0.026488926,0.0000012409557,0.000015193487,4.4355605e-7,0.015664218,0.000101761856,0.00007009811,0.9550242,0.00015555762,0.0023534957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007401208,0.00008020921,0.468405,0.00002404917,0.000028865335,0.00000123235,0.12402359,0.00030902252,0.0000092634045,0.0020174717,0.40429747,0.000063685016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29743934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76122105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9530067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025439766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007916148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9151424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103142816","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2717","title":"Victim impact statements at sentencing: Towards a clearer understanding of their aims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Normative; Legislature; Order (exchange); Craft; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; History; Business","score_opus":0.0867052643159974,"score_gpt":0.40131605196388676,"score_spread":0.31461078764788936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103142816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89120376,0.0000959614,0.003838451,0.0020028607,0.0004488106,0.00021423529,0.000026380936,0.00002191679,0.10214763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858475,0.00019499776,0.00043486425,0.00012767306,0.00010473956,4.9108912e-8,0.000003110938,0.000007712436,0.0005421227],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825233,0.00061907497,0.00032252006,0.00012235418,0.00036775562,0.0003159741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983848,0.00038168038,0.0005285562,0.0001935886,0.00021641128,0.00029499282],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013722436,0.00010648439,0.0003181609,0.000026341784,0.0008303354,0.0000049074083,0.0002281229,0.0001228062,0.01292166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017322063,0.00008601806,0.00015225296,0.000030302928,0.00015575445,0.0005638772,0.00016016416,0.0003719437,0.00002195575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0085737845,0.0017563102,0.3392334,0.0024199411,0.0027914105,0.000116464864,0.4614882,0.00018972781,0.0065218615,0.07395645,0.082283705,0.02066877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005316955,0.001489962,0.03595668,0.0010443656,0.00024350046,0.000021342667,0.6593702,0.0011156861,0.00016179153,0.0033074087,0.2916214,0.00035072793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057345685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036988243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30327672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016115787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015735335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98798066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110221353","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2167","title":"Panel selection on high courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Panel data; Allocative efficiency; Political science; Law; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04291580922159556,"score_gpt":0.2478318461141811,"score_spread":0.20491603689258553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110221353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08189149,0.00029620406,0.000281595,0.0017767017,0.0005845853,0.000045983805,0.00000374983,0.000022188891,0.9150975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985981,0.00019570407,0.00018283993,0.000054965167,0.0002592823,1.0544711e-8,2.9402608e-7,9.238205e-7,0.00070789334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945736,0.00006276211,0.00004442981,0.000049878785,0.00028469143,0.00010088366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995735,0.000019132971,0.00006063385,0.000020537595,0.00021462196,0.00011155622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002315949,0.000034145698,0.00007174168,0.000007707544,0.0010167973,0.000012319637,0.00010032559,0.000033729873,0.00035445797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002582689,0.00003547474,0.00003773074,0.000018111396,0.0002703597,0.00023356368,0.000016152491,0.000059050642,0.000016135687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008285792,0.000050957944,0.0009395945,4.322455e-7,0.00003491551,0.000012086171,0.0047477144,0.000050413924,0.000010126356,0.9839835,0.008171838,0.0019155545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079308345,0.0002588705,0.00922885,0.000031195785,0.000045255845,0.000009572211,0.036223464,0.0000068737613,0.00002251572,0.033967376,0.9192803,0.00013264931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44261882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39752504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95001614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044407227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016645937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7820485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114343904","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0047","title":"Beyond the countertrade taboo: Why the WTO should take another look at barter and countertrade","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taboo; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024467333516138133,"score_gpt":0.1780342202317672,"score_spread":0.15356688671562907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114343904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7173282,0.0037751354,0.00029759522,0.012876165,0.0014137914,0.00022069253,0.00028358828,0.000018049634,0.2637868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943949,0.00095029525,0.00013157347,0.0028624213,0.00018605418,1.4541845e-7,0.0000022522245,0.000013361526,0.0014589869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992379,0.000016597063,0.00025094143,0.00019470547,0.00005064448,0.0002492175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992684,0.00005007316,0.00028007478,0.00028392242,0.000024520341,0.000092990675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003698733,0.00014103543,0.0002479605,0.000017750055,0.00064129435,0.00010715399,0.0004958814,0.00011519372,0.0033427447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061194332,0.00011087308,0.00014311583,0.000017064509,0.00038256473,0.00051185174,0.00008736418,0.00031141704,0.000049381542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030725513,0.00021590332,0.07354829,0.000032072796,0.00063604244,0.000045880002,0.009621397,0.000059738144,0.00093691266,0.761266,0.15235573,0.0009748053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007556871,0.00006220599,0.020191392,0.0000069101334,0.000027907763,0.0001535512,0.0012041497,0.0003600349,0.00004208189,0.0043351525,0.9726861,0.00017481123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006582515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077115156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8203304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015625042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011034654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121799125","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1203","title":"Savigny’s theory of choice-of-law as a principle of ‘voluntary submission’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Key (lock); Law; Sociology; Reflection (computer programming); Law and economics; Conflict of laws; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02190900661073231,"score_gpt":0.27186577919541177,"score_spread":0.24995677258467947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121799125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3362352,0.00078550127,0.00028045534,0.00020406608,0.00017425905,0.00006378813,0.000012447162,0.000005939511,0.66223836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989551,0.0002485876,0.00032472573,0.000025579167,0.00009027906,1.7482767e-8,4.7511665e-7,0.00000153924,0.00035374812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913114,0.00016629502,0.00016068888,0.000067948,0.00035588632,0.00011805533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991205,0.00015127844,0.00028969158,0.000069610374,0.00028097534,0.00008796192],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005588304,0.000054093325,0.0002160426,0.000013899602,0.00056390127,0.0000030017445,0.00027407732,0.000052485633,0.0009780567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009014503,0.00005256748,0.0001313509,0.00002884084,0.0012976229,0.00023358702,0.00007741133,0.00006733852,0.000001708538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010290636,0.00007957019,0.0053225495,0.000010088975,0.000072700204,0.0000017930175,0.0044449396,0.0000072380085,0.00035564028,0.9881497,0.00009096773,0.0013619007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015692151,0.00054982235,0.0665999,0.00040133792,0.00025086786,0.000006347762,0.028837439,0.000008233561,0.0013229635,0.13536404,0.764829,0.00026084104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35058728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1893215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85278565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001101632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015554343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123071053","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0005","title":"Constructive Trusts from a Law and Economics Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Plaintiff; Unjust enrichment; Express trust; Damages; Law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Wrongdoing; Sociology; Political science; Business; Computer science; Restitution","score_opus":0.009137035967406807,"score_gpt":0.23603158689937292,"score_spread":0.22689455093196612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123071053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18006153,0.0003661276,0.00015634624,0.0023770751,0.000061388506,0.00006332056,0.00004491998,0.000010205135,0.81685907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951992,0.0005341082,0.003660926,0.00010111734,0.00023438002,2.356489e-8,4.6611183e-7,0.0000019660513,0.00026781767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965864,0.0000389805,0.00005691383,0.0000877481,0.00006265088,0.0000950758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996071,0.00003950843,0.000088033776,0.000052330197,0.00009710189,0.00011593325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009510636,0.000040777843,0.00008604771,0.000005070509,0.00086076616,0.000035737317,0.00013652892,0.000043012766,0.0007685127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005142453,0.00004773347,0.000044069806,0.000008657792,0.0005459278,0.00056170643,0.00003698033,0.00007627717,0.000004790414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015624248,0.000016570122,0.0001336103,2.231698e-7,0.000029269255,0.0000010383078,0.020053575,0.00000792628,0.000011164826,0.9782759,0.000089506626,0.0013655688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060911576,0.00002441385,0.0016483715,0.0000077487675,0.000039948554,0.0000055947517,0.15519802,0.000060916038,0.000027854221,0.02101607,0.8212576,0.00010435002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42665574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7429038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95725983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052234926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007039566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84146756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129370845","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.467","title":"PROPERTY AND COLLECTIVE UNDERTAKING: THE PRINCIPLE OF <i>NUMERUS CLAUSUS</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Private property; Politics; Property rights; Context (archaeology); Political science; Democracy; Converse; Law; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04223924788035284,"score_gpt":0.2432543048598389,"score_spread":0.20101505697948607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129370845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0346519,0.00059376546,0.00015460009,0.00042584215,0.00011238811,0.0001642235,0.000003201271,0.000009667943,0.9638844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885042,0.00042639283,0.00038143093,0.000035565972,0.000040147686,3.4344435e-8,9.696669e-8,0.0000025500467,0.010609633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935704,0.00014461309,0.00009090995,0.000075402546,0.00019665026,0.00013539137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948585,0.000028582497,0.00014988345,0.00007730198,0.0001724365,0.00008596461],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037293354,0.000052790834,0.000121588,0.000009347353,0.0010460617,0.000015566962,0.0002738696,0.000044473287,0.00094589265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018191502,0.000028276121,0.000054634114,0.000036784815,0.00064350443,0.00035945,0.000057532943,0.00010267892,9.914978e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052805897,0.00023567473,0.003957529,0.00001686496,0.00021060873,0.000033814176,0.13184285,0.0000016623325,0.00029162585,0.8555807,0.0016954365,0.005605205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073102844,0.00027596927,0.008086464,0.000040955572,0.00006714163,0.000015922957,0.014803471,0.000018680239,0.00034256733,0.0034989663,0.9720004,0.00011843911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19954975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23107012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97030497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001606223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018945817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131317104","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020614-02ra","title":"The work of Lon Fuller: A promising direction for jurisprudence in the twenty-first century","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.011890624605049945,"score_gpt":0.2366738668175516,"score_spread":0.22478324221250165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131317104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.269814,0.010479592,0.004407858,0.021393027,0.0022556304,0.0010115043,0.000009899711,0.000028511738,0.6906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816895,0.0014688646,0.00013330767,0.00001815921,0.00013855934,1.4288692e-7,1.1666978e-7,8.042249e-7,0.00007110778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994175,0.00012260144,0.00008129097,0.000049544527,0.00021540985,0.00011367128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994595,0.00025389058,0.00012290796,0.00004111947,0.00009969571,0.000022856437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009154821,0.000033958397,0.00007777121,0.000006404697,0.002212883,0.000020602478,0.00023515259,0.000025821697,0.00001989217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008074542,0.000023500099,0.000069778274,0.00004205052,0.0004636405,0.00015370687,0.000023130748,0.000058710993,4.4531677e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035482977,0.00011020035,0.007799437,0.000008847757,0.00005967396,0.0000019010588,0.043332495,0.000050253064,0.00002210804,0.9187501,0.0016804569,0.027829694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036488276,0.000070141905,0.02246515,0.00010386962,0.000030487732,0.0000013955929,0.040728632,0.000009765201,0.0000065791637,0.004987257,0.9311732,0.00005865997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069218576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47784096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015639004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044348355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133791078","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0115","title":"The goals of regulating work: Between universalism and selectivity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Normative; Work (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.010160563250065478,"score_gpt":0.22672867526483892,"score_spread":0.21656811201477344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133791078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92292416,0.00025475165,0.00013939869,0.0012286133,0.0000690772,0.000091275295,0.0000040516466,0.0000074199556,0.075281255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977616,0.00028237767,0.00037116406,0.000010642138,0.00005542344,1.0440801e-8,1.9137906e-7,0.0000017742439,0.001516837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994034,0.00014979005,0.00007586772,0.00005310629,0.00018034346,0.00013750012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936676,0.00014048803,0.00016169953,0.000061600265,0.00018243589,0.0000869884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004169174,0.000037966463,0.00009245658,0.000007679363,0.0014551395,0.000034330005,0.00018455679,0.000039447164,0.0003127667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023467845,0.000031737105,0.000039123723,0.000041448442,0.000375494,0.0004881027,0.000052552583,0.00007256437,2.3882419e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026019203,0.000045256333,0.08159053,0.0000037655257,0.00019976457,0.0000022264828,0.027637597,0.000007357803,0.0003244876,0.818727,0.0030463967,0.06838957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005608114,0.00006340115,0.7568911,0.00004543106,0.000059773723,6.518533e-7,0.045249857,0.000007543803,0.000064086125,0.0036521496,0.19329718,0.00010806715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26525983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16675353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81507486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001228272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004835853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149087219","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2817","title":"Tribunal administration and the duty to consult: A study of the National Energy Board","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Duty; Law; Principle of legality; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Appeal; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02045605531417109,"score_gpt":0.2159457382052585,"score_spread":0.19548968289108742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149087219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5402585,0.000050641753,0.00035825663,0.0063055316,0.00040136866,0.00026960913,0.00000633557,0.00001040166,0.45233932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972164,0.0000029035662,0.00005119899,0.0021903627,0.00015408966,1.5019812e-7,0.0000012849441,0.000001829749,0.00038175232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999349,0.00003174668,0.00012505596,0.00005907866,0.00038431067,0.000050789593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916,0.000023826244,0.00020633193,0.000044427095,0.00054930383,0.00001614098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033973934,0.00004869355,0.000081735896,0.000018081742,0.00024392034,0.000054279357,0.00018502602,0.000016238982,0.00013884899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005531217,0.00003235312,0.000040825133,0.000037017406,0.000115089635,0.0005463385,0.000076721786,0.000043712094,0.0000020496545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046779308,0.00014551831,0.00096211093,0.0000025777324,0.00005163444,0.0000013162773,0.0005972554,0.000056556903,0.00003182662,0.99151444,0.006107092,0.00006190226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021049684,0.00046659834,0.04034089,0.00006532701,0.00028158422,0.000043546563,0.033083506,0.0055234707,0.0001519238,0.019814892,0.8788488,0.00032979378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011503191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046138357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97169954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064754735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004538498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151919055","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.707","title":"‘TO HEAP DISTRESS UPON DISTRESS?’ COMPARATIVE REFLECTIONS ON INTEREST-RATE CEILINGS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financial literacy; Skepticism; Economics; Redistribution (election); Politics; Interest rate; House of Commons; Political economy; Law and economics; Public economics; Positive economics; Political science; Monetary economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.04980467333542229,"score_gpt":0.26138788674817104,"score_spread":0.21158321341274874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151919055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73975,0.00012420687,0.0013944589,0.00060257624,0.001002555,0.00009049503,0.00021348069,0.000021845806,0.25680038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966817,0.00014224264,0.0011282876,0.0001162258,0.00016315299,1.578895e-7,0.00000896193,0.000010150839,0.0017491581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991839,0.000025760964,0.0002686671,0.0002439134,0.00004129033,0.00023649205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991197,0.000036651778,0.0003432996,0.00022852843,0.000078323115,0.00019350005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020067098,0.00013957998,0.0003442568,0.00006568077,0.00053449674,0.000061574894,0.00033771992,0.00009379429,0.0009419925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000074138065,0.00016919323,0.00015295844,0.00005663449,0.00011804521,0.0004092281,0.000059900853,0.00035725482,0.000130502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004820642,0.000478029,0.0012831928,0.000021352427,0.00015155843,0.00006631081,0.013123935,0.00032463705,0.0018777826,0.9732704,0.00761614,0.0013045996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009807753,0.00030710496,0.011362273,0.000072589544,0.000015845473,0.000024599065,0.0012742537,0.00019314975,0.00056863634,0.0013333388,0.9835319,0.0003355169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018703545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1851957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9759158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022595923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014432534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154988461","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0003","title":"The Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Status quo; Law and economics; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Law; Legal realism; Legal research; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014877897780977298,"score_gpt":0.2264908908722523,"score_spread":0.21161299309127501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154988461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06600149,0.0022029495,0.0032092114,0.0007479395,0.0004041377,0.00004865983,0.0000054366533,0.0000077796885,0.9273724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978278,0.0014842921,0.00013027326,0.000018652678,0.000081355916,1.6669322e-8,2.4093532e-7,5.3013514e-7,0.00045679093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994792,0.000099185665,0.000075537886,0.00003477218,0.00023596751,0.00007535156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995579,0.000091549584,0.000094640054,0.000028156031,0.00019273013,0.00003501044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003315307,0.000028148273,0.00006310533,0.0000058016217,0.0030711598,0.0000062240433,0.00016815757,0.000021292877,0.00017919665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054127446,0.000023061335,0.00006953735,0.000019746765,0.0021337257,0.00033543992,0.00002710419,0.000052744526,0.0000021773142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009496171,0.000017422579,0.00034276184,4.9279737e-7,0.000038231487,0.000009440222,0.005470745,0.000017310776,0.000013271657,0.9905833,0.00026137778,0.0031506864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005767637,0.00010024259,0.026262157,0.000057156292,0.000052955045,0.00006133609,0.063341945,0.00001730931,0.000039668168,0.052029956,0.8573407,0.00011981516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07936588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16922633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93855333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014521222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002378709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158042753","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2926","title":"The lawyer as fiduciary: Defining private law duties in public law relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Law; Obligation; Discretion; Normative; Political science; Private law; Trust law; Sociology; Law and economics; Public law","score_opus":0.05001110103854751,"score_gpt":0.31067836116635655,"score_spread":0.26066726012780905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158042753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067711934,0.00030968618,0.000029278206,0.051601898,0.0004480411,0.000059313395,0.0000025372908,0.000016710193,0.9407613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938329,0.00013207333,0.0008570338,0.0005117746,0.00008950124,1.2859668e-7,0.0000026052394,0.000003539839,0.004570448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989331,0.00032680787,0.00014936012,0.000075844226,0.0003213283,0.00019361047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883944,0.0002598403,0.00020280102,0.00011262389,0.00044032314,0.0001449647],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015245241,0.000052633106,0.000079379475,0.00002076846,0.0026588538,0.00025079798,0.00032469304,0.00006765622,0.0010239705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004105295,0.00005027171,0.00003915752,0.00013201371,0.00053130306,0.0027920967,0.00004563939,0.00034173325,0.000056520083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015166013,0.000037285165,0.00071419793,4.5828972e-7,0.000014980505,0.0000030193278,0.023112256,0.000009929321,0.0000012451623,0.97018945,0.005637001,0.00026501375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025592436,0.000020253427,0.00044641196,0.000009296845,0.000009711987,0.0000048157517,0.06608922,0.000005390282,0.0000018573604,0.029389458,0.9037109,0.000056757697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4380256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8514165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005433547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008293528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158052902","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2087","title":"Private ownership and the standing to say so","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Institution; Law and economics; Politics; Property (philosophy); Order (exchange); Law; Private law; Sociology; Political science; Business; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029379287020417144,"score_gpt":0.26759781105064157,"score_spread":0.23821852403022442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158052902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026649553,0.00016381867,0.0028848818,0.04105664,0.00020877857,0.00008596834,0.0000029564887,0.000014922863,0.9289325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980736,0.00010428168,0.00042938517,0.0006342099,0.00020577562,8.647238e-9,6.05759e-8,0.0000015448475,0.00055112643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992282,0.00028758234,0.000055291654,0.00005506075,0.00021071275,0.0001631606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993817,0.00026076796,0.00004660989,0.000057603633,0.000055008393,0.00019827989],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014465832,0.00003634691,0.000089235225,0.000006918123,0.0015887807,0.000049973893,0.0002131797,0.000048291757,0.00020425154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001972859,0.000027539418,0.00004437887,0.000016489814,0.00093023566,0.00022443038,0.000049100643,0.00013319586,0.000003590938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060700477,0.000004670671,0.00007688326,0.000002178307,0.000009675094,0.0000012312436,0.017564625,0.000002163932,0.000006888814,0.9813828,0.00018555703,0.00070266303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083678233,0.00006052653,0.0008091695,0.00003697259,0.000033263237,0.0000026594164,0.012206529,0.000022398839,0.000010957205,0.29714215,0.68875235,0.00008622714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033417106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06398069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97142404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013440833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034917626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162482819","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0117","title":"THE CONSTITUTION AS FRAMEWORK FOR GOVERNANCE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Corporate governance; Public administration; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.010284514206548316,"score_gpt":0.25738612952854023,"score_spread":0.2471016153219919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162482819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001613525,0.0007377815,0.016060583,0.004755844,0.00048792388,0.00014605079,0.00001419578,0.000010568056,0.9761735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888686,0.0008675439,0.0057685478,0.00018702638,0.00024376299,1.3643636e-7,4.143011e-7,0.0000012049924,0.004062795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949867,0.000051780462,0.00006448453,0.00004689,0.00017725998,0.00016093194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918497,0.00029547594,0.0001279249,0.00005696284,0.00023245202,0.00010219578],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019044701,0.00003627317,0.00006219822,0.0000017950111,0.0025704538,0.000044404835,0.00022932545,0.000045528628,0.0010454494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014556626,0.000031582193,0.000072430536,0.000012746758,0.0016381765,0.00036794346,0.000015745478,0.000072649746,0.00001891544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011893997,0.000007783913,0.00007363417,8.442841e-7,0.000014965466,9.2638953e-7,0.0004823274,0.000003596425,0.0000030120477,0.9935814,0.003989543,0.001830055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010387655,0.000028234317,0.00026142498,0.000015269663,0.000011568582,0.0000041777134,0.00701546,0.000003685579,0.0000035634237,0.037628654,0.9548818,0.000042316096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19455165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06100572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98725504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026971338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005664112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165253292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.0301-2","title":"THE OVER-CRIMINALIZATION OF PERSONS WITH HIV","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Exceptionalism; Harm; Criminology; Sexual assault; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Environmental health; History; Virology; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.008283993410580115,"score_gpt":0.21478927099888664,"score_spread":0.20650527758830653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165253292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13630305,0.001444705,0.00082079903,0.0042009046,0.00020150731,0.00020440875,0.000007618341,0.000019982022,0.85679704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887755,0.0010704837,0.0007480076,0.000038579838,0.000080811806,3.8514436e-8,6.2101674e-7,0.0000022854003,0.009283668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994967,0.00007479088,0.000048786034,0.000039689545,0.00024002063,0.00010000113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999538,0.000031484993,0.00012207234,0.00005328807,0.00019741952,0.000057726043],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016372067,0.00003320376,0.000059960435,9.303731e-7,0.0014029951,0.000028480892,0.00021283443,0.000043411164,0.0016151968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007943595,0.00002308219,0.00006162574,0.000022354163,0.00051900547,0.00044022026,0.000014323434,0.0000605864,0.0000023219027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067281326,0.00008627823,0.0038404756,0.000013721562,0.00015425062,0.0000042374304,0.26124227,0.00003384558,0.00026007113,0.643247,0.08843443,0.0026161398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037565635,0.00006827099,0.004198403,0.000034753495,0.000056010747,0.0000036306506,0.43247303,0.000021295642,0.000030281542,0.0008581497,0.5618106,0.00006989309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06484152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14203672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8524725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011548102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057805075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W216707762","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2012-02r","title":"Tribal Constitutionalism: States, Tribes and the Governance of Membership; Beyond Blood: Rethinking Indigenous Identity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Identity (music); Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; Democracy; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.010995649330058628,"score_gpt":0.174968539463916,"score_spread":0.16397289013385738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W216707762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39345917,0.00992875,0.00030950626,0.0018375742,0.00070196536,0.00036016994,0.00030830255,0.00002629525,0.59306824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957509,0.0005128999,0.00011455468,0.00011351615,0.00009570047,8.866072e-8,0.0000039141896,0.0000027337696,0.0034056618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992773,0.00008676841,0.00018237717,0.00007571478,0.00024362511,0.00013420098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992982,0.00012097334,0.00021540286,0.00007667991,0.00020277014,0.000085954045],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023397335,0.00007460157,0.00020672947,0.000007684684,0.00070899253,0.00006034167,0.00021874659,0.000036190515,0.0024176876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018766059,0.00005621001,0.000098126584,0.000008489384,0.001570994,0.00094166683,0.00005283688,0.00014513842,0.0000031239938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066365035,0.000048941984,0.00007870773,0.000017035516,0.00008683673,0.000009514096,0.025081823,0.000002206737,0.0000038565945,0.9738569,0.0005370318,0.00021076974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073554497,0.0003962238,0.0012964897,0.00017014291,0.00051126914,0.00012808647,0.031236315,0.0003318032,0.000022330876,0.5403481,0.41777083,0.00043295507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17867266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100189246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60229176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101359954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000563985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171032244","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.123","title":"WHY DOES ONTARIO REQUIRE EQUAL TREATMENT IN SALES OF CORPORATE CONTROL?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Control (management); Business; Law and economics; Event study; Value (mathematics); Empirical evidence; Tender offer; Empirical research; Microeconomics; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Corporate governance; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.025174482933552827,"score_gpt":0.18008237044853323,"score_spread":0.1549078875149804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171032244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.967831,0.00026735713,0.00018191042,0.00023986048,0.00020190189,0.000111485,0.000009908167,0.000011873564,0.031144684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797887,0.00017408446,0.00012026205,0.0001751332,0.00014502603,6.2039824e-8,0.0000052594173,0.000005963516,0.0013953374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930453,0.0000138154655,0.00020289833,0.00011711869,0.00019823328,0.00016337227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897736,0.000017018665,0.00071759336,0.00011588541,0.00015347295,0.000018664756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000118156495,0.000116682895,0.00029235505,0.000039079365,0.00020299152,0.000018812212,0.00018880526,0.00005019062,0.0014543458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004518555,0.00009780238,0.00012485447,0.00004489366,0.00016214311,0.0017890659,0.00004342607,0.00007523256,0.000006380859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003372547,0.0013049034,0.8205591,0.00014062182,0.0004267691,0.002350435,0.004480369,0.00065409933,0.0024804634,0.14842781,0.011838045,0.003964878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008194536,0.00022651989,0.1727619,0.00018407714,0.00015317103,0.000040260184,0.0024692756,0.00017262169,0.00009431099,0.002691016,0.8126554,0.0003569396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80052054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97797006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8008173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004321344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008603023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172136248","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.941","title":"IS SYSTEMIC RISK RELEVANT TO SECURITIES REGULATION?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Systemic risk; Broker-dealer; Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Realm; Business; Financial regulation; Hybrid security; Financial institution; Financial market; Financial system; Economics; Investment banking; Financial crisis; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.009638277215983728,"score_gpt":0.1877742171988643,"score_spread":0.17813593998288058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172136248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82871324,0.0014172506,0.0026356538,0.0006441288,0.00096506806,0.00012580033,0.00022860724,0.000023966875,0.16524631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959223,0.000315091,0.0016179737,0.00007298469,0.00009485076,4.6663338e-8,0.0000012746477,0.000005178177,0.0019702702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943966,0.0000112205025,0.0002307589,0.00013177506,0.0000526688,0.0001339133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992888,0.000014277944,0.0003111151,0.00016106955,0.000102233425,0.00012251295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002467114,0.000070899274,0.00019349519,0.0000338865,0.00032784833,0.00003314327,0.00020504139,0.000075467615,0.005040027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039482962,0.00009011777,0.000118332435,0.000028581853,0.000057926372,0.0003468939,0.000038251674,0.00012518674,0.00023642213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004933304,0.000035313005,0.020166844,0.000013715207,0.00003934734,0.0000048771785,0.0032811866,0.00006390488,0.00011860629,0.9650287,0.009937192,0.0012609728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070112274,0.00009757595,0.17935042,0.000049398037,0.000018659652,0.000057518344,0.0022881874,0.00027890634,0.00006216967,0.027868642,0.78899103,0.00023634853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01862787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017975412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013112897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016514528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246285831","doi":"10.2307/825992","title":"Taking Law Seriously","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; sort; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.014648262376545214,"score_gpt":0.2551295873113233,"score_spread":0.24048132493477808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246285831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037401833,0.00012715787,0.00009035744,0.0009634071,0.00004148407,0.000039266935,0.0000037967495,0.000017238104,0.96131545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99268353,0.00034140603,0.0010000144,0.00010891147,0.00012671342,1.5883456e-8,4.17758e-7,0.0000022710992,0.0057367263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953526,0.000046694517,0.000061175604,0.000060769053,0.00016363627,0.00013248505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967295,0.000014665185,0.00007897416,0.00006920374,0.000055935154,0.000108246146],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017432965,0.000035147637,0.00006645643,0.0000034280094,0.0015222378,0.000037203587,0.00025662134,0.00003829271,0.016904999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027451779,0.000040016697,0.00006468946,0.000019745758,0.0002278622,0.00045691984,0.000017379843,0.00007578182,0.000035635207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013852159,0.00003189146,0.00009330967,0.0000012557174,0.000014602672,0.000009570115,0.009217567,0.00003136918,0.00004661547,0.97428584,0.0006509277,0.015603201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016145232,0.00001445759,0.0007623326,0.000008569738,0.000011373077,0.0000042471625,0.005159616,0.000009589703,0.000008132975,0.0008712823,0.9929376,0.000051343606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4589903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64850885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017871098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047909107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255984055","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3437","title":"The lure and the limits of dialogue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028836825296061897,"score_gpt":0.24361622916133863,"score_spread":0.21477940386527672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255984055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032582168,0.011186512,0.000091431095,0.012395158,0.00039324735,0.000088826884,0.0000050859626,0.000005330729,0.94325227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971254,0.0024546946,0.000036739333,0.000026120088,0.00010015729,1.2705672e-8,5.8248144e-8,4.203527e-7,0.00025641473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995661,0.000111227215,0.00004699225,0.000026258474,0.00018315513,0.00006628351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955976,0.00012238884,0.00007406764,0.000028253702,0.00016661223,0.000048906277],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057932263,0.000022924803,0.00006755354,0.0000020882417,0.0014448783,0.000011979384,0.0001564946,0.000018560515,0.000019066958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080689366,0.000013481304,0.000037481324,0.000013608668,0.0020481423,0.00011899046,0.000035882902,0.000044215496,6.953262e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088612906,0.0000066211273,0.0006566147,3.4516222e-7,0.000033302997,0.0000015423261,0.012750215,0.0000017848665,0.0000014580379,0.98292667,0.0016430181,0.0018898275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010980262,0.00004693635,0.004663474,0.000017163924,0.000055193334,0.0000048712263,0.12353906,0.000003579062,0.00000393353,0.050089017,0.8204306,0.00004817191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22319661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5488094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9645432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053475283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009554081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258436064","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3244","title":"Polycentricity and queue jumping in public law remedies: A two-track response","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polycentricity; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Sociology; Negotiation; Legislature; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05971884230427966,"score_gpt":0.30081584581321086,"score_spread":0.2410970035089312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258436064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82365596,0.0017571929,0.000091027476,0.011583918,0.00031028115,0.00010686452,0.0000032827431,0.000024552743,0.16246694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845046,0.00038234727,0.0006070663,0.0001051696,0.00008890171,2.0126741e-8,1.6734687e-7,0.0000025734755,0.0003633069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986783,0.00046323927,0.000121596284,0.00011948766,0.00035588426,0.00026144134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990768,0.00015957619,0.00011402268,0.0001044127,0.0001973207,0.0003478793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022345257,0.00006415355,0.00014828533,0.000029685849,0.0006386543,0.00007252562,0.00034369464,0.000060665327,0.00016648752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040597847,0.00007212557,0.000045725363,0.000058806025,0.00044184958,0.0013348351,0.00010492669,0.00014805168,0.0000034840496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034778721,0.0002326864,0.014864156,0.000025859928,0.00005419033,0.0005932883,0.15668005,0.000021409107,0.0004467692,0.8125607,0.0071149804,0.003928056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018797898,0.00020799063,0.0058759158,0.00016298563,0.00003604771,0.00005494075,0.17695846,0.000046775058,0.000039166294,0.003719812,0.81078625,0.00023187426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48505667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85746753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8088409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070145883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025743534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51837236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259722634","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3398","title":"The inhospitable court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Jury; Allegation; Plaintiff; Sexual violence; Law; Criminology; Meaning (existential); Political science; Criminal justice; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.007220496383931603,"score_gpt":0.21774061532967542,"score_spread":0.21052011894574382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259722634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072233146,0.0020093957,0.0002727417,0.017242318,0.00059578096,0.000063149986,0.000005144489,0.000022650423,0.97256553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911122,0.016942242,0.00069287926,0.00012923026,0.00043854013,3.1996066e-8,1.4366717e-7,0.000004018578,0.070670895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940985,0.00008736071,0.00005102674,0.000047883335,0.00023881903,0.00016503071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999544,0.00006913193,0.00008216093,0.00006924835,0.00014600871,0.00008941929],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047929672,0.000034109766,0.00005612283,5.1636573e-7,0.0029017844,0.000031001957,0.0003531905,0.0000590472,0.0016512003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002456649,0.00001981465,0.00009060564,0.000014412909,0.00060286786,0.0004617116,0.000030471185,0.000058538826,0.000014045375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026937529,0.000025129055,0.00061296165,0.000001055745,0.000054371354,0.0000068007507,0.02134133,4.909958e-7,0.00012514502,0.8420817,0.12585132,0.009872758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021631453,0.000018621216,0.00028321304,0.000014454957,0.00001024553,0.0000016892417,0.038440317,2.1302367e-7,0.00001570911,0.0030630182,0.9578979,0.00003830305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02071582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18882018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002628553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000715326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261443190","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2964","title":"Public law and ordinary legal method: Revisiting Dicey’s approach to <i>droit administratif</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Public law; Principle of legality; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Municipal law; Political science; Legal history; Common law; Positive law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.0647117251803447,"score_gpt":0.2874538842758036,"score_spread":0.2227421590954589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261443190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002518817,0.00035402828,0.0015443191,0.006618118,0.00014375588,0.000104767314,0.000007254304,0.000025979034,0.988683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759515,0.000057442638,0.021170923,0.0005920044,0.0007951004,8.69098e-8,0.0000017255679,0.0000067825467,0.0014244203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860114,0.0003649792,0.00014060363,0.0001682067,0.00045607463,0.00026897056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987382,0.00005487726,0.00014071963,0.00009086337,0.00028065997,0.0006946641],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001393449,0.000092710696,0.00022700871,0.00001712849,0.0013918792,0.00017666245,0.0003572125,0.00009671526,0.00008648232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078062556,0.00010350948,0.00009269035,0.00006751188,0.00033744637,0.0014718272,0.00011648184,0.00019009228,0.000004201603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044965433,0.000048845188,0.00006106449,0.0000074682034,0.00003121258,0.000028016231,0.012778278,0.0000021269732,0.000014616441,0.9831837,0.0011552516,0.0026445005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058402156,0.00017851104,0.00008236887,0.00002742383,0.000050854134,0.000039231636,0.044774376,0.000014573237,0.0000061823034,0.019853944,0.93417746,0.000211045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15154521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060556415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98725855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003757709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272064723","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3239","title":"Adjudicating constitutional rights in administrative law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Formalism (music); Human rights; Common law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.053723045879230845,"score_gpt":0.2983441586715995,"score_spread":0.24462111279236867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272064723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03206426,0.00013728693,0.00008701243,0.00025535777,0.00017550566,0.000053250995,0.000004862893,0.000011199644,0.96721125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975427,0.000014108663,0.0010619538,0.000032292977,0.00013077907,1.851806e-8,0.0000011227169,9.059531e-7,0.0012161261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992038,0.00014697031,0.00010580945,0.000084966814,0.00030252273,0.00015594106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994015,0.000038547074,0.00012055876,0.000053456086,0.00016219514,0.00022373072],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043285088,0.00005209677,0.0001153524,0.000015236013,0.0009338994,0.000028014312,0.00022951476,0.00005735206,0.0013438973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000124932985,0.00005336925,0.000049580874,0.000021109096,0.0017600246,0.0006248041,0.000022419277,0.00011955694,0.00001802674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029578025,0.000049412476,0.00022718597,8.894506e-7,0.000011054008,0.000059502443,0.016649088,0.000003762214,0.0000028309732,0.9821548,0.0007598498,0.000052031868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014332694,0.00011572484,0.0008978052,0.00006698256,0.000019307668,0.0000182059,0.03215678,0.000010859176,0.000027727072,0.07611196,0.8889841,0.00015731924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18026817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8739539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96599513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000503412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035820386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291541762","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3155","title":"An economic analysis of waiver of tort in negligence actions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Plaintiff; Tort; Doctrine; Damages; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Liability; Deterrence theory; Contributory negligence; Strict liability; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.0226978752234672,"score_gpt":0.21142859090212532,"score_spread":0.18873071567865812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291541762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92647564,0.00038959485,0.0019984485,0.000056938337,0.00031626294,0.000061654624,0.00027885023,0.0000040868067,0.07041849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864304,0.00096037897,0.00020308365,0.0000059772105,0.00004632359,5.0355904e-8,0.0000016840403,0.0000046953014,0.00013474766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991158,0.000023076975,0.0005341165,0.00016567585,0.000024404084,0.00013693115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987891,0.00003490863,0.00082271965,0.00022516491,0.000042358064,0.00008576259],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003798478,0.00006434936,0.000543815,0.00016935114,0.00007410517,0.0000072035086,0.0003079912,0.00007536503,0.0025185961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000076247734,0.00008183987,0.00024317512,0.000052504958,0.00018317744,0.0007865955,0.000029046267,0.00004086348,0.000013749201],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111458496,0.0001739413,0.4702323,0.000012529491,0.00087647914,0.0000039140364,0.0018562134,0.0012903789,0.00040854476,0.5234918,0.000112410096,0.0014299967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037640752,0.000649571,0.93245894,0.00015340422,0.0004561841,0.00001069647,0.0066243913,0.0043233456,0.00095156964,0.020512305,0.02933551,0.000759999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15308785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2086097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5029795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005565593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003480849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312964853","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3622","title":"Between universalism and relativism: Reflections on the evolution of law and development studies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Political science; Bureaucracy; Washington Consensus; Universal suffrage; Law and development; Context (archaeology); Relativism; Politics; Blueprint; Political economy; Developing country; Development economics; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Epistemology; Development studies; History","score_opus":0.0705247228216803,"score_gpt":0.3010891666861169,"score_spread":0.23056444386443659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312964853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53373694,0.00100591,0.0015409605,0.005251724,0.00019329593,0.00018956003,0.0000075539465,0.00002170727,0.45805237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969545,0.000510003,0.0008232906,0.00001513052,0.000028201432,2.158916e-8,7.2082734e-8,0.0000014251164,0.0016673374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948835,0.00010943506,0.00008015194,0.00006695627,0.00016913634,0.000085970234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995363,0.0001501894,0.000103157916,0.000040143255,0.00011335652,0.000056862293],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000399455,0.000043509368,0.00009575023,0.000015409043,0.0015064097,0.000008128523,0.0000792968,0.000032652104,0.00011708257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012900801,0.0000259975,0.000016957201,0.000013849695,0.0006764866,0.00024593898,0.000041069376,0.000043396147,0.0000010257468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013732879,0.00000941634,0.0006091226,0.0000021969834,0.0000865987,0.0000016788888,0.05880038,1.4943964e-7,0.000027961118,0.9388853,0.00022332415,0.0013401477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086471887,0.00015595577,0.036508296,0.00025657585,0.000059975195,0.0000032783407,0.14501859,2.2372609e-7,0.000119599135,0.025611436,0.79124105,0.00016031669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014764823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14878607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057773036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099543075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314134142","doi":"10.2307/825999","title":"The Legitimate Extent of Freedom of Expression","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.014263215657445864,"score_gpt":0.22510592371711377,"score_spread":0.2108427080596679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314134142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044865455,0.0071263933,0.00020197964,0.0013789333,0.00051540957,0.0001328208,0.000017087204,0.000014204659,0.94574773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873803,0.0069429316,0.0011461242,0.000009528326,0.00009472485,1.8082064e-8,1.9691784e-7,0.000002045962,0.0044240947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999331,0.000101694415,0.000100189776,0.000045047243,0.00031110435,0.000110976776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994071,0.00004870832,0.00022659093,0.000082555765,0.00017568418,0.00005936603],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029884063,0.00003749286,0.0000983374,0.0000012212658,0.001018653,0.000010768676,0.00034054974,0.0000609775,0.0018216326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001580939,0.000028139159,0.00013998456,0.000020133155,0.0006889306,0.00028739177,0.00003906047,0.00007612412,0.0000013669866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014644634,0.0004365762,0.0008279977,0.000042993724,0.00019494543,0.000017260989,0.2875303,0.0002499271,0.007992497,0.57104766,0.12299823,0.008515176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071437156,0.00010638965,0.0006172663,0.00013457627,0.000050017577,0.0000039846077,0.18451807,0.00006963367,0.00082519813,0.001198364,0.81166303,0.00009912104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014419307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02572134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9425149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081853046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017238091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320189691","doi":"10.2307/825913","title":"The Charter and Poverty: Beyond Injusticiability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.010514691940649535,"score_gpt":0.23122063798725465,"score_spread":0.22070594604660512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320189691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31662753,0.0005482387,0.00014634438,0.0042021563,0.00034147472,0.0000899377,0.0000021188005,0.000012817286,0.6780294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321496,0.001640986,0.000217432,0.00015976062,0.00012058085,1.4274176e-8,1.7395695e-7,0.0000016540079,0.004644404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994736,0.00007776057,0.00006422105,0.00005876273,0.0001885934,0.00013711721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966204,0.00005342024,0.00004053161,0.000055370856,0.00008293026,0.00010570561],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004730768,0.00003630852,0.00006410664,0.0000044230314,0.002248051,0.000048583337,0.00015072964,0.000030815925,0.0013607744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011896283,0.000025732574,0.000030935884,0.00001106036,0.00035816245,0.0002684215,0.00003293726,0.00006074019,0.0000036692668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002072112,0.000096900134,0.007863706,0.0000052402656,0.00008824389,0.000060589344,0.09247688,9.64604e-7,0.000034544857,0.8309469,0.02051312,0.04770569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019705229,0.0000333168,0.014904378,0.0000053851486,0.000011646075,0.0000050562076,0.016352156,0.0000041298413,0.0000022622546,0.0057442086,0.96269137,0.00004905222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024939068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43367195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94217825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017143191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006336737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326814643","doi":"10.2307/3650877","title":"Atoms of the Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Atomic and Molecular Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.00392297835788481,"score_gpt":0.17396237466412345,"score_spread":0.17003939630623865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326814643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15584809,0.00012077308,0.011188883,0.00003888656,0.0001493829,0.000051154173,0.000012436775,0.0000027693618,0.8325876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989289,0.000003172301,0.00045037948,0.000018187708,0.000027441838,6.482881e-9,3.8239637e-7,0.0000029610753,0.0005685933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996742,0.000044642842,0.00006321708,0.000044606237,0.00009477158,0.00007858509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996624,0.000007208958,0.00012347288,0.00011264242,0.00005535427,0.00003894632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000054940894,0.000046018093,0.000089321235,0.0000018883894,0.0001919966,0.000004061145,0.00016548684,0.000015028412,0.0006739048],"category_scores_gemma":[5.0301134e-7,0.000038908587,0.00014606693,0.000011198907,0.0001271518,0.00010875263,0.000030335526,0.000070995135,0.0000019036839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056038457,0.000040122195,0.0014135523,0.0000016240477,0.000059502814,7.553113e-7,0.00039530746,0.000014946176,0.00064300996,0.99663985,0.0002809596,0.00050477067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003714911,0.00013040881,0.0027032706,0.0001148254,0.00034800518,0.000021347392,0.020216867,0.00008611671,0.06561384,0.0777195,0.82888204,0.00044887254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00906512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009950552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91892034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031440453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040095678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331989244","doi":"10.2307/825927","title":"Identifying the Maori Treaty Partner","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0442503408053541,"score_gpt":0.2614163553888796,"score_spread":0.21716601458352547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331989244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049781627,0.0019346861,0.00023577192,0.001254136,0.00022249264,0.000039146853,0.0000029906885,0.000013873763,0.99131876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97974503,0.0011787477,0.00016693206,0.000018927734,0.00016995486,1.7523547e-8,8.313312e-8,0.0000019346826,0.018718379],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993308,0.00013890126,0.00006415213,0.000061552724,0.0002395983,0.00016495342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996632,0.000034426444,0.00008186267,0.00007508603,0.00006687286,0.00007856471],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002961942,0.00004667251,0.000094281306,0.000006346441,0.0023001109,0.00003417578,0.00024032145,0.000033937155,0.0033281737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012195143,0.00003684805,0.00010269652,0.000024394716,0.00045061356,0.00030042452,0.000031549313,0.000083407656,0.000038965096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003815332,0.00010759326,0.005358343,0.0000052651094,0.00023418371,0.00007971875,0.61763424,0.0000036550355,0.000017190254,0.31199387,0.042862453,0.02166535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002507997,0.000015094295,0.0020081303,0.000013137744,0.000040541956,0.000006517156,0.40173298,0.000009306141,0.0000017109973,0.0005929935,0.5952652,0.000063553365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023133937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09708992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97476685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013227854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012409459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361095287","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3873","title":"Acquisitive prescription and fundamental rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Doctrine; Nothing; Medical prescription; Law; Virtue; Political science; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.01045418138607904,"score_gpt":0.23882048966831887,"score_spread":0.22836630828223983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361095287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37607422,0.0003223914,0.0016206707,0.0035134922,0.00014729041,0.00012528762,0.000023888655,0.000022030603,0.6181507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959363,0.00023949727,0.00038521184,0.000015813095,0.00007810815,1.9859758e-8,1.9079089e-7,9.446511e-7,0.0033439696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996647,0.00004398491,0.000040513914,0.000055543227,0.00011276782,0.0000824751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997405,0.000021650843,0.000056402667,0.00003550471,0.000055228313,0.00009071155],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001234421,0.00002701627,0.000045144046,0.000004760226,0.0008680811,0.000018858384,0.00009370894,0.000026904454,0.0010389534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000030459441,0.000021363767,0.000028465722,0.000007582975,0.00026116587,0.00054868497,0.000029130159,0.000024626168,0.000005419899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026545184,0.000029251589,0.0006934517,9.5299237e-7,0.000018434985,0.0000036000251,0.0070050824,1.3268176e-7,0.0013086741,0.9853639,0.0007715645,0.0047783917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004249938,0.000037490398,0.0103243375,0.000021477388,0.000015404905,0.000003990588,0.006443406,0.0000017009709,0.00008398538,0.0036647667,0.97892416,0.000054314743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06566434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17548618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98169917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019964727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021581245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399871532","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3671","title":"Law and development: Forty years after ‘Scholars in Self-Estrangement’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Embeddedness; Field (mathematics); Political science; Relation (database); Law; Milestone; Sociology; Social science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.009156073736940879,"score_gpt":0.22802735484153128,"score_spread":0.2188712811045904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399871532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56944835,0.0014350849,0.00013088272,0.0003575833,0.00025202546,0.00015076443,0.000008668492,0.0000369767,0.42817968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937241,0.0002477417,0.0053616245,0.000052571333,0.000040878098,6.3674996e-8,1.1803498e-7,0.0000034700504,0.0005694002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992635,0.00008787073,0.00009753589,0.00009934732,0.0002502031,0.00020150474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996488,0.000029923682,0.00006820687,0.000062599014,0.00005318012,0.00013727257],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041569368,0.00005486244,0.00009864759,0.000016426087,0.0002940083,0.000031995067,0.00020607702,0.00006437953,0.0010888202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010213874,0.000051089053,0.000028798613,0.00002171595,0.00026573727,0.000958628,0.00006316917,0.00007735981,0.000013263273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034085428,0.00027390075,0.12383382,0.00002803077,0.00019256366,0.00063430145,0.71364814,8.9214717e-7,0.00012051651,0.12974174,0.000677252,0.030507954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007359167,0.000022274662,0.029800583,0.000052987787,0.000011085261,0.0000018497103,0.0061693243,1.3557323e-7,0.000013546817,0.0002559514,0.9628412,0.00009511443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023318024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34499475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045287432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000750562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416877329","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3808","title":"Enhancing moral relationships through strict liability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Liability; Strict liability; Doctrine; Moral responsibility; Law and economics; Default rule; Blame; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04650170053143371,"score_gpt":0.22399929395256063,"score_spread":0.17749759342112692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416877329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7179391,0.00024141904,0.015938843,0.0014216144,0.0006721904,0.00013385765,0.000035957328,0.0000683481,0.26354867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996592,0.00018245234,0.001492861,0.00003171364,0.0000670781,1.5699387e-8,1.13303166e-7,0.0000035906155,0.0016302016],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910325,0.00023494106,0.00012972423,0.00015343561,0.0002090734,0.00016957201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931204,0.00024567393,0.00013893923,0.00015491596,0.00005874116,0.0000896919],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027370531,0.000070268805,0.00010857268,0.000009585642,0.0006202735,0.000012602051,0.00027901746,0.000048927268,0.0016971175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027370843,0.000054206383,0.00009622343,0.000034081346,0.00019294782,0.0012341178,0.00006320248,0.00012561069,0.000030209252],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038689494,0.0004170396,0.020404449,0.000034380373,0.000034550023,0.00023417834,0.0057047964,0.00004033785,0.55990005,0.39757696,0.0036706366,0.011595705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007205949,0.0011557929,0.14339542,0.00063527393,0.0001931204,0.0005101554,0.007495601,0.00014341608,0.41690782,0.0705091,0.35047215,0.0013761979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003521126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011195241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34680152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023282511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038611564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461480614","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3761","title":"The past and future of law and development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Ethnocentrism; Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.00945480414423544,"score_gpt":0.2261087200482236,"score_spread":0.21665391590398816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461480614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07173717,0.010427142,0.00020762079,0.0062439353,0.00051656214,0.00012419069,0.000008439514,0.000015821488,0.9107191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588066,0.0014537977,0.0014953082,0.000019182273,0.0001577867,9.788191e-9,3.6127854e-8,0.0000015787389,0.000991666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953955,0.000067370536,0.00006400085,0.00005034135,0.00017517708,0.000103528604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961823,0.000067862326,0.00009052951,0.000048025922,0.00008754078,0.00008782847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003057276,0.000034854358,0.00006962284,0.0000036918561,0.0009948695,0.000018055302,0.0001605709,0.000037346676,0.00016180913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000067787023,0.000022090717,0.000016709839,0.000007980035,0.0007535866,0.00026158712,0.00006054312,0.000037603924,9.517091e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007029194,0.000018881212,0.0033025476,0.000006275046,0.000056940702,0.000008911556,0.19848275,5.0186294e-8,0.00007698656,0.73926383,0.0007754119,0.057937123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023371216,0.000019385323,0.0016976098,0.00001370531,0.000007011233,0.0000016823096,0.020358592,6.4322634e-8,0.000021235299,0.00031737852,0.97729546,0.00003416947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010340332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10503342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97652006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097986784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043166627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465874630","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3851","title":"Taking on responsibility and trusting others: A response to Shiffrin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06740742379365061,"score_gpt":0.2692754594714817,"score_spread":0.20186803567783107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465874630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97836435,0.000016068096,0.00031805786,0.004648871,0.00011720026,0.00005458482,0.000010812656,0.000013107061,0.016456949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778974,0.000018652114,0.0008260793,0.0005245618,0.00003083269,2.6266491e-8,2.0141128e-8,0.0000033221734,0.00080676377],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906933,0.0003035522,0.000091663904,0.00020168767,0.0001805379,0.00015323043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992246,0.00037224087,0.000109860746,0.000117393836,0.000028450571,0.00014746004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062217226,0.0000675476,0.000099292425,0.000028812103,0.0003292862,0.000011410471,0.00018395607,0.0000367014,0.0007592886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038678342,0.000052599327,0.000044988992,0.000020835669,0.00016742384,0.00024340917,0.00006361567,0.00007029642,0.000017423155],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017456185,0.0001780073,0.0010812044,0.0000055785285,0.00001456179,0.00021101267,0.002281326,0.000010557025,0.92773074,0.015176662,0.0007853334,0.035068803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0096545275,0.004986024,0.7823373,0.0011384622,0.000053472148,0.00081684184,0.004330559,0.00004541825,0.06014156,0.006402452,0.12934734,0.00074602664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067384966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011093229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86758924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020724439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001954924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8313678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W249145109","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2015.1","title":"Middle Income Access to Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Demographic economics; Criminology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07346225000072863,"score_gpt":0.30139953577419404,"score_spread":0.2279372857734654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W249145109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10051164,0.00012682378,0.0008593875,0.0013517299,0.0007040037,0.00008924533,0.000002598586,0.000021059512,0.8963335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98351437,0.000084212224,0.0053264247,0.00024011533,0.00028690574,2.5408816e-8,4.1978097e-7,0.0000036597921,0.010543892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928266,0.0000732944,0.0000756334,0.000070091024,0.00033920843,0.00015912394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920094,0.00001920744,0.000068107525,0.0000618868,0.00023761511,0.00041223675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046091605,0.000043604152,0.000092030954,0.000017392344,0.0008000016,0.00007514198,0.00046242672,0.000036699974,0.0017685279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025094076,0.000041735635,0.00003549574,0.000029589717,0.000108415225,0.00073013955,0.000098915494,0.00005696704,0.000040769246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023459627,0.0001782551,0.002411854,0.000024817738,0.000096199445,0.00021211972,0.30518386,0.00010264472,0.000013730807,0.6123423,0.07452563,0.0046740077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036707235,0.00005125319,0.003214061,0.000034262343,0.000025974967,0.0000033077176,0.03349246,0.000002427488,0.0000079231095,0.001871437,0.9608354,0.00009442144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08784916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43527162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88630974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005427308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024082397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507249553","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4008","title":"The path of the law: Towards legal singularity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Witness; Singularity; Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Tax law; Sociology; Mathematics; Tax reform","score_opus":0.02024037742337321,"score_gpt":0.2663106734233213,"score_spread":0.24607029599994812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507249553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088960625,0.00046545526,0.0023591274,0.011455192,0.001567855,0.00018378872,0.000019277448,0.000022923514,0.89496577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969848,0.00023348711,0.00025863101,0.000044489738,0.00014020284,1.5553526e-8,3.04882e-8,0.000002690841,0.002335666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988392,0.00029018093,0.00013947186,0.0000750051,0.00045539698,0.00020072046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990917,0.00014808752,0.00021894918,0.0001783316,0.00028012766,0.00008281222],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009247271,0.00005456536,0.000104737905,0.0000037727832,0.002371362,0.000037152524,0.00082100363,0.00006511041,0.0006803938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012218265,0.000030237123,0.00016145184,0.00002938446,0.0022969944,0.00052616565,0.00010997777,0.00007983422,0.0000047697313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035381716,0.000026642016,0.0003099487,0.0000010480848,0.000019734662,0.000003815958,0.0059637916,0.0000013682545,0.00039009695,0.980821,0.0006837351,0.011743396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012472314,0.000052676332,0.0009731253,0.000059925707,0.000029370376,0.0000044650888,0.022514401,0.000003995846,0.0018354171,0.016457668,0.9578625,0.000081731356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3342805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68636984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033264747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019169204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513622979","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1045","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.006228755026898652,"score_gpt":0.21161473306984047,"score_spread":0.2053859780429418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513622979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021164415,0.37245426,0.000111894034,0.0015457844,0.00066195225,0.00021343525,0.00004094366,0.00008096299,0.6227743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19750136,0.57776994,0.045039415,0.036662474,0.002770713,2.3563267e-7,0.000046795543,0.00037928548,0.13982978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925625,0.000063913954,0.00012488746,0.00010021918,0.00027620996,0.00017852733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990832,0.000018971868,0.00023933398,0.00022919825,0.00022042333,0.00020885967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038541103,0.00008815592,0.00020908737,0.000012568235,0.00032536825,0.0000115971825,0.00043609974,0.00005442842,0.06750925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024609288,0.000094956624,0.000170857,0.000020579442,0.00018454966,0.0009044377,0.00006955756,0.00032256372,0.000538988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004012219,0.000060563238,0.000068983376,0.00006187019,0.000053618576,0.000075059164,0.00017489196,5.401773e-7,0.0044011273,0.004882265,0.9889092,0.0012717908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047054628,0.000041354146,0.00053829787,0.0002661341,0.00009370831,0.00023355965,0.00011175702,0.000004892466,0.0001083578,0.000028319486,0.9980024,0.00010067015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075880177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052697916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48294455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017070523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057064193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513997421","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3609","title":"Quantifying <i>Dunsmuir</i>: An empirical analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s jurisprudence on standard of review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Deference; Standard of review; Law; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Voting; Political science; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Medicine","score_opus":0.04199834323995864,"score_gpt":0.3078332140184926,"score_spread":0.26583487077853396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513997421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76003087,0.01794406,0.00092682434,0.025826106,0.00066693756,0.00039506122,0.0005702915,0.000012428073,0.19362743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937461,0.0060409266,0.00006869484,0.00006666795,0.000020067193,1.4091423e-8,1.802465e-7,9.145613e-7,0.000056409714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987243,0.00018538917,0.00019674745,0.0000741268,0.000706813,0.00011263091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988873,0.00011229361,0.0003611314,0.000102790866,0.00046633978,0.00007012221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060029543,0.0000504128,0.00033125505,0.0000157442,0.00052347884,0.0000021246112,0.00035724387,0.000026864593,0.0004135703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010514888,0.000032817727,0.00017798264,0.000112642294,0.000758559,0.0001637672,0.00004559772,0.000045961522,8.9672454e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008618042,0.00040512605,0.27395067,0.00020609408,0.0031985203,0.00002347985,0.016549313,0.00012967516,0.0013722656,0.6745306,0.019909466,0.008862981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015445275,0.0008380513,0.4799613,0.005988355,0.0044682957,0.000004314278,0.03833311,0.000015412805,0.0013601878,0.0017854704,0.46519104,0.00050993124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8539605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99379826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67274517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002991245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009023642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45283046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514792834","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.521","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013165894464398087,"score_gpt":0.20910273735557172,"score_spread":0.19593684289117363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514792834","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076994207,0.6871888,0.00011778332,0.00052122865,0.00011624368,0.00011246435,0.000018732544,0.00004616348,0.31110865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03188782,0.906992,0.005133338,0.008340534,0.0003234143,4.2389633e-8,0.000009490601,0.00007095522,0.04724238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991547,0.00010053255,0.00013661289,0.000100274905,0.00032470017,0.00018320262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991719,0.00001636879,0.00023557691,0.00018368108,0.00020460243,0.00018786926],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021527502,0.000090841575,0.0002430855,0.00001333042,0.00054309453,0.0000039719157,0.0003530376,0.00003753528,0.032292694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000139705935,0.00010013738,0.00019220864,0.00002595022,0.00022807646,0.0009151691,0.00006096514,0.0001437155,0.0005515557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004587723,0.000055842545,0.00009803878,0.00004717235,0.000056451954,0.00032772956,0.00033564627,0.0000025826034,0.00016145923,0.00072550087,0.99787927,0.0002644501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058579847,0.000063486565,0.00094645435,0.00042736827,0.00007406075,0.0010144754,0.00013471437,0.0000043276355,0.000039014147,0.000008126649,0.99659777,0.00010443011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007934108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064509697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26386628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045961913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007218399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516572032","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3406","title":"Rethinking original ownership","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Accession; Scholarship; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Dominance (genetics); Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics; Linguistics; Epistemology; International trade; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018252520956592685,"score_gpt":0.18495122941874237,"score_spread":0.16669870846214968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516572032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93188995,0.00020654224,0.000063827756,0.006369315,0.00042522725,0.00005572094,0.000016745802,0.000035444435,0.0609372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925844,0.00040139782,0.0002050327,0.00002969015,0.00024205257,4.1210986e-9,7.7882305e-7,2.220933e-7,0.0065364433],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995975,0.000024421714,0.00005898497,0.000067303634,0.00012812985,0.00012366932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997368,0.000028689888,0.00007780298,0.00002034771,0.000050235703,0.00008612796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012924372,0.00004650835,0.000077897865,0.0000015721766,0.0004104881,0.000012143837,0.00019179838,0.00005059734,0.0038873528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000020944076,0.0000069455477,0.00008118815,0.000012018944,0.00008536583,0.0003000149,0.000025205994,0.000047820107,0.000011735407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038759262,0.0001660904,0.008953477,0.000008990923,0.00013174249,0.00018646712,0.0021028293,9.2275104e-7,0.099833496,0.07905702,0.004594885,0.80457646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031284319,0.00019356282,0.010934428,0.000055948123,0.000012019139,0.000059721016,0.00048051868,0.0000014605564,0.00045361268,0.0050672684,0.9823357,0.000092951464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010204031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07198483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97774076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000714399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056157446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525314292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3959","title":"The Moral Unity of Public Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy of law; Adjudication; Dignity; Jurisprudence; Public law; Political science; Analogy; Sociology; Political philosophy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Morality; Politics; Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036241777053454584,"score_gpt":0.24241479684511122,"score_spread":0.20617301979165664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525314292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02796861,0.00093708374,0.00024137029,0.006619162,0.00026538057,0.00003949929,0.0000100965435,0.000008811173,0.96391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809074,0.0011230757,0.000053785163,0.000023171457,0.00008985009,1.0997993e-8,6.252473e-8,7.1685804e-7,0.00061858207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937785,0.00013022446,0.00007067225,0.000040005925,0.00024779412,0.00013342735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939275,0.000111233356,0.00010604409,0.00004838566,0.0002670172,0.00007459577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004917093,0.000032152613,0.000077372126,0.0000041434737,0.0023563942,0.0000133655285,0.00026988934,0.000027185346,0.00039252164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004190852,0.000020244399,0.00007052662,0.000021645445,0.0021764946,0.00037646343,0.000054491946,0.000038806047,0.0000036581546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015777168,0.0000170212,0.00162301,3.670149e-7,0.00003411125,0.0000020138566,0.0010899126,1.1265973e-7,0.000031071177,0.9916671,0.00056682917,0.0049526542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000343003,0.00004633671,0.006518138,0.000023881648,0.000020890553,0.0000020343168,0.022408975,2.2460968e-7,0.000026964855,0.050156545,0.92039454,0.000058457048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3444298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80360025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97012216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017864596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012723773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553297566","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3855","title":"The Puzzle of Intra-Familial Commodification","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Normative; Context (archaeology); Resentment; Criticism; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Positive economics; Political science; History; Market economy","score_opus":0.015735448531999218,"score_gpt":0.24023396855608983,"score_spread":0.22449852002409063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553297566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9001105,0.0026686876,0.0022511971,0.020555232,0.00040806053,0.00028694846,0.000011839829,0.000046531713,0.073661014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969268,0.0019250022,0.0006360644,0.000011842815,0.00005009957,2.9376343e-8,2.6381676e-7,0.0000019763236,0.00044792876],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995849,0.000029016628,0.00010481047,0.000062565436,0.00012533483,0.000093339375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993487,0.00005392096,0.00014971427,0.00019809554,0.00020013799,0.00004942981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022760718,0.000035752146,0.00010727047,0.000010355266,0.0002496391,0.0000018763635,0.00013278205,0.000041181243,0.00008749326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008432124,0.000020560004,0.000051776606,0.0000147880655,0.0003468291,0.000117568794,0.000025856421,0.00006786502,0.0000024367112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036454722,0.00041781017,0.029304007,0.00011462187,0.00029223014,0.000038568418,0.0014195037,0.0000012954689,0.1024984,0.2637951,0.014094173,0.58437884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050845505,0.001442151,0.2382645,0.0002979772,0.0001534261,0.00024307381,0.009195485,0.000011158926,0.044793062,0.005709902,0.69464564,0.0001590577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00275627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038189704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68055147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014170112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047152014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41666743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553335236","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3860","title":"De-Ciphering Self-Help","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Scholarship; Government (linguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.011420178437838158,"score_gpt":0.23900912723153353,"score_spread":0.22758894879369537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553335236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06682227,0.00015513755,0.006394595,0.0034466644,0.00009891613,0.000057557227,0.000005106948,0.00004680709,0.9229729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925805,0.00044284874,0.0034163129,0.000026356664,0.00013620897,1.912996e-8,4.764012e-8,0.000002050944,0.0033956745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960685,0.000043136613,0.00004649122,0.000048744398,0.00012240966,0.00013238857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966514,0.00003061815,0.00006166823,0.00005772377,0.00006503234,0.00011979429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023830979,0.00002786236,0.00004947558,0.0000038372177,0.0007274651,0.000019333245,0.00022235313,0.000033232427,0.0019483696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009240839,0.000024186207,0.000051271316,0.000012865118,0.00010747858,0.00036556186,0.000032528995,0.000036634483,0.000014868117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013656454,0.00005479801,0.0022614296,0.0000026711798,0.000034927572,0.000009792621,0.013227848,0.000003895226,0.0013547977,0.9632403,0.0022938156,0.017502015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019888794,0.000012914397,0.0020188985,0.000013233635,0.000011337391,0.0000028716574,0.005141034,0.0000042167667,0.00003954686,0.0009166425,0.9915957,0.000044737277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057673886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10691803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98930186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041405766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008920958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555205963","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4007","title":"The post-modern lawyer: Technology and the democratization of legal representation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Democratization; Legal process; Legal realism; Legal service; Political science; Livelihood; Law; Practice of law; Legal research; Legal ethics; Legal pluralism; Legal education; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.011318898144744405,"score_gpt":0.265649658808152,"score_spread":0.2543307606634076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555205963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50165576,0.0024072705,0.05179743,0.11246234,0.00091216556,0.00067589997,0.000012986916,0.00006737096,0.3300088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780804,0.000929141,0.00022215868,0.000017853788,0.000044841185,4.54954e-8,8.744546e-8,0.0000017234006,0.0009761322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934345,0.00019258243,0.00011409169,0.00005984219,0.00019147948,0.00009855938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990836,0.00027459857,0.00019576191,0.00009395689,0.00032208438,0.000030045021],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000583159,0.00003301903,0.00007502719,0.0000136508115,0.0013395003,0.000023342574,0.0002756182,0.000051804425,0.000126697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021320059,0.000018676606,0.000039934454,0.000044555458,0.0023623921,0.0004891546,0.00004693645,0.000049591297,0.000001448326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121345256,0.000007728126,0.0009608219,5.8208656e-7,0.000016704402,0.0000012670389,0.006477918,0.0000041656017,0.000906494,0.94880074,0.00010473129,0.042597525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021176098,0.0003377957,0.003213309,0.00014565077,0.00017992132,0.00004704049,0.2570405,0.00050644315,0.008695057,0.3960561,0.33135766,0.00030293028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04051308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31654912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5527446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008748649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055737695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561364701","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.1","title":"MITIGATING STATE SOVEREIGNTY: THE DUTY TO CONSULT WITH INDIGENOUS PEOPLES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Sovereignty; Human rights; Duty to protect; Indigenous rights; Political science; Conceptualization; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.01102152311945175,"score_gpt":0.23804451248450872,"score_spread":0.22702298936505697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561364701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67375636,0.00010712318,0.0001580413,0.00091723347,0.0001589774,0.00022280602,0.00002815117,0.00001652753,0.3246348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958134,0.00026011266,0.0008786705,0.00010327489,0.00014458396,6.96567e-8,6.545759e-7,0.000006602991,0.0027925763],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881756,0.00012660111,0.000110300025,0.00012672647,0.00042870198,0.00039007782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987676,0.000100656536,0.0003542822,0.0002619668,0.00029254446,0.00022294732],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006148047,0.00009771078,0.00017190562,0.000011442398,0.014928012,0.00030033034,0.0009075121,0.000052165633,0.0010232498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004281281,0.00006793724,0.0000759055,0.000018740127,0.00082371663,0.0006434146,0.0000831533,0.00015655122,0.000011423396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018082731,0.00007747208,0.005908334,0.000011139271,0.00016186676,0.00015941195,0.75751346,0.0000468148,0.00004168322,0.23087588,0.00057908124,0.0044440245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018515184,0.00058631314,0.03720937,0.00023506045,0.00016378453,0.00008545768,0.5214623,0.000007732067,0.00021851975,0.003929036,0.4336605,0.00059034914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6020645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9707142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43308145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003251259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006309229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572350151","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4216","title":"Why judges should dissent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Political science; Judicial opinion; Transparency (behavior); Law; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.04189442167510912,"score_gpt":0.29010924771984514,"score_spread":0.24821482604473602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572350151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014555329,0.0006904135,0.0001292889,0.012135619,0.0003694671,0.000033893582,0.0000043411465,0.000009792699,0.9720718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977152,0.00095443183,0.00015355222,0.000133558,0.00024042871,1.11524665e-8,1.8233088e-7,0.0000010267158,0.0008016466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950093,0.000034303237,0.000048502323,0.000056541518,0.00023831887,0.00012137692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999576,0.00001861962,0.00011762725,0.000076704244,0.0001204588,0.000090634174],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018071834,0.000039021732,0.00008907221,0.0000045433953,0.005745553,0.00005542196,0.0003700323,0.000034125434,0.0013993139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044298158,0.00003908174,0.00007840117,0.000004898148,0.0011152206,0.00051115605,0.000079231635,0.00005961035,0.00000953675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003218494,0.000043029264,0.010222778,0.0000013015485,0.00006409827,0.00003738373,0.0047559794,0.0000015690986,0.000023767992,0.9575305,0.023981165,0.0033062522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020515776,0.00001713345,0.024526017,0.000019261535,0.00002869027,0.0000024923231,0.018927837,7.400295e-7,0.000007551648,0.0072959913,0.9489001,0.00006900977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5178304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79247814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98315984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016869833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005880157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576008894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4217","title":"Ten theses on dissent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028879671997048793,"score_gpt":0.27744498722907146,"score_spread":0.24856531523202266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576008894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025566814,0.00020831008,0.000022873688,0.0032821915,0.00023924884,0.00002516473,0.0000032864605,0.000006067751,0.970646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790496,0.00065741176,0.00006363445,0.000031142667,0.00019192684,8.523019e-9,8.467549e-8,7.469693e-7,0.0011500847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995838,0.000030891162,0.000036634367,0.000047308993,0.00020519817,0.000096191965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996637,0.000026440764,0.00009869624,0.00006718252,0.00007801046,0.00006597457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014921725,0.00003243513,0.000071236675,0.0000039399115,0.0049647274,0.000041221454,0.00030370784,0.00002280826,0.0006245131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005060047,0.000029626246,0.000062913925,0.0000034319282,0.00084698776,0.00029685075,0.00004785064,0.000046930905,0.000012046156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003769163,0.000037452177,0.0030929656,5.088146e-7,0.000036805708,0.000022771612,0.0034834861,0.0000014972829,0.000009411032,0.98574907,0.0012868199,0.006241515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033759038,0.0000855957,0.09235202,0.00006665141,0.00003447141,0.0000027710078,0.037012458,0.0000011776926,0.000018165281,0.015289658,0.8546918,0.00010764708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37905595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49178115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97233814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013716806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000511904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577250387","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4041","title":"Commodification and the allocation of care and responsibility for children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Nexus (standard); Context (archaeology); Cash; Sociology; Law and economics; Public relations; Business; Political science; Economics; Economy; History","score_opus":0.033296371499663045,"score_gpt":0.3238004875552276,"score_spread":0.2905041160555646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577250387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507299,0.0016208725,0.00037142838,0.028986441,0.00007533316,0.00031172967,0.000016244481,0.0000047725644,0.017883264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982465,0.001260141,0.00040982608,0.00001529709,0.000027542761,4.4906585e-8,8.641048e-7,7.20405e-7,0.000039085327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996578,0.000114496004,0.0000623505,0.00004241567,0.000081235936,0.00004168481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993176,0.00007395624,0.00018664813,0.00009169899,0.00030070127,0.000029429119],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008124928,0.00001950783,0.00006374261,0.0000049107907,0.0015137256,0.000020072866,0.00012671271,0.00003283296,0.00001190102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111043795,0.000016863316,0.000018389033,0.0000040192967,0.0006052457,0.00020460796,0.000018083885,0.000033230914,3.1822104e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030749565,0.000010973041,0.005389126,0.00001965853,0.000015537153,6.117368e-8,0.045129944,1.4842597e-7,0.000017275492,0.9051909,0.000079429235,0.043839462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031832736,0.00017777186,0.7464874,0.000062620726,0.000045800574,0.0000026133691,0.19036213,0.000035195448,0.000064141976,0.0060561793,0.053433996,0.00008888857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04198297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32174328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053334534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054241013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577385108","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016r3","title":"How to end mass imprisonment: The legal and cultural strategies of Bryan Stevenson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Mass incarceration; Law; Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Life imprisonment; Criminal justice; Legislature; Prison; Sociology","score_opus":0.016056524630071296,"score_gpt":0.26575665211865734,"score_spread":0.24970012748858605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577385108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.944995,0.00029862963,0.0008755796,0.0025626388,0.0001622304,0.000050951377,0.0000060859634,0.0000036942545,0.051045224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978001,0.00055944605,0.0002913334,0.000007007761,0.000083424005,1.7715147e-8,1.3792054e-7,0.0000011638302,0.0012573373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952835,0.00005567378,0.000052459913,0.0000620383,0.00019965357,0.000101852376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999506,0.000021533473,0.00016581269,0.00010798015,0.00012172893,0.00007692405],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020771008,0.00004261849,0.00009762172,0.00000941995,0.0021127888,0.0002914427,0.00030811128,0.000028353537,0.00015889127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021982669,0.000034036664,0.000073958036,0.000012193667,0.00036351715,0.0009821509,0.000047181136,0.0000648393,3.875132e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040393256,0.0001922695,0.0057232524,0.000057503796,0.00072823424,0.000092764916,0.36420202,0.00017159557,0.008671126,0.3145468,0.0029246644,0.30228585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120685305,0.000067113455,0.003877605,0.000013885069,0.00016185503,0.0000041386074,0.9343741,0.000014517168,0.00006230267,0.00006546599,0.061195128,0.000043238277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42662683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75296223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5701721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093619885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004558435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578643190","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3883","title":"Against racial profiling","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Racial profiling; Inference; Officer; Profiling (computer programming); Psychology; Criminology; Presupposition; Exclusionary rule; Social psychology; Race (biology); Political science; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.026716426334872697,"score_gpt":0.23611097618504887,"score_spread":0.20939454985017616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578643190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43344423,0.00009563026,0.00021664452,0.00032782016,0.0006156752,0.000053998112,0.000009720174,0.000017075103,0.56521916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771976,0.00019051772,0.0005503536,0.00005664561,0.00014737132,7.320176e-9,1.7339084e-7,0.0000033095296,0.0013318277],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994726,0.000035547364,0.00007043974,0.00010895041,0.00017046639,0.00014200514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994552,0.00001535503,0.0002061755,0.00019116815,0.00004014727,0.0000919278],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009945599,0.00005697438,0.0000939119,0.000007652673,0.0017782989,0.0000589681,0.00048630647,0.000034559922,0.00044921754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007970189,0.000057315912,0.000085711545,0.0000051082175,0.00022554243,0.0008713074,0.000112538844,0.00010830168,0.000016178094],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032563007,0.0002764929,0.0029412922,0.00003397473,0.000033618282,0.0017692003,0.0035700325,0.000053025116,0.7958178,0.13617618,0.0028805868,0.056122173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056286934,0.0004797802,0.017806781,0.00024900006,0.00009316935,0.00029262857,0.003068202,0.0011679789,0.43064886,0.0031741897,0.5364968,0.0008939042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022455656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006656588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56427556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000705954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029059542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579109160","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4262","title":"The role of dissents in appellate judging","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Concurrence; First amendment; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.010881212267710706,"score_gpt":0.24792491752561457,"score_spread":0.23704370525790386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579109160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.179595,0.001354465,0.000012523994,0.00078611256,0.00015523749,0.0000317517,0.0000016314468,0.000002030951,0.81806123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984775,0.0012534494,0.000025963975,0.0000027296567,0.00004695655,5.5242086e-9,3.4105575e-8,5.098409e-7,0.00019283868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962944,0.000034664416,0.00005575675,0.00003269056,0.00015423025,0.0000932079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996879,0.000027705793,0.00013827166,0.000052615727,0.00006208586,0.000031381147],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002710574,0.000023572191,0.00006558494,0.0000039563915,0.0030179613,0.000022561379,0.000308553,0.000017946435,0.00006229578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033349374,0.000019959505,0.00004289337,0.0000063877555,0.0007752727,0.00023345779,0.00006160385,0.000044495737,0.0000013750544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004963165,0.000027489574,0.08121553,9.0044233e-7,0.00003731791,0.000008884131,0.008026915,0.000006415242,0.000091914495,0.889981,0.00006817901,0.020485861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065066316,0.000036764246,0.32592377,0.00013121254,0.000033150405,0.0000023954085,0.1490638,0.000019829436,0.00010662026,0.06921573,0.45468998,0.00012609882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43597156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72671014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82076526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087528635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000483084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591591668","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.6","title":"THE AUTHORITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Principle of legality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019544201955677,"score_gpt":0.29297163796962145,"score_spread":0.2734274360139444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591591668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22221567,0.000035128694,0.000018191491,0.00034412372,0.0003040761,0.000029137045,0.0000032058936,0.00000366776,0.7770468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812188,0.000016019801,0.00008654577,0.00000236649,0.00018078966,5.6200364e-9,2.0440432e-7,9.831541e-7,0.018494247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994229,0.00007201602,0.00007760416,0.000045512996,0.000282358,0.000099597775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924654,0.000034287175,0.0002835314,0.00013183698,0.00024277683,0.000061000326],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004557557,0.0000327696,0.00007448741,0.000004888303,0.012026321,0.00007072832,0.0007797845,0.000037141406,0.0009836346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010165769,0.000025017816,0.00008910413,0.000001752843,0.000915817,0.00045340933,0.000045342065,0.00007366779,0.0000033261886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014038535,0.000017411652,0.00012712204,7.820055e-7,0.000024337174,0.0000057411376,0.0023614184,1.4656135e-7,0.000022254995,0.9967607,0.00055696454,0.000109080866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034490443,0.000060256432,0.013556086,0.000026674577,0.000023972183,0.0000017835362,0.00097381073,0.0000026560724,0.00012461845,0.3006517,0.6841694,0.000064111155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3487312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8570334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75900316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013424228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038362006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593517378","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.7","title":"IS THE PRINCIPAL FUNCTION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO ADDRESS THE PATHOLOGIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW? A COMMENT ON PATRICK MACKLEM’S <i>THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; International human rights law; Political science; International law; Principle of legality; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Public international law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05262080441488057,"score_gpt":0.32050096005471757,"score_spread":0.267880155639837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593517378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10292596,0.000026653914,0.00004479495,0.01958881,0.0006617218,0.00020000618,0.00016871603,0.000007493826,0.87637585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998745,0.000013666327,0.00003271753,0.0006410237,0.00026162446,2.1426223e-7,0.0000025748411,0.0000024543776,0.0003007287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984862,0.00025632326,0.00024223191,0.000109830624,0.0007500914,0.00015532922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846256,0.00021760246,0.00054388406,0.00029985048,0.00040686905,0.00006924674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096179626,0.00008753275,0.00016380078,0.000016802996,0.003526049,0.00005132949,0.0015948067,0.00008999252,0.00068433484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003334336,0.00005299755,0.00019139274,0.000013635434,0.0020740044,0.00033935776,0.0002679286,0.0002704923,0.0000017972811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012729752,0.0001262183,0.00031473057,0.000004830678,0.00010913041,0.0000030716963,0.0075257933,0.000012081532,0.000063793625,0.99052,0.0011592645,0.00003379691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011429344,0.00050829333,0.014042767,0.00015749111,0.00014344483,0.0000031573195,0.0057545183,0.000009708555,0.0015777786,0.56833667,0.4081669,0.00015634121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18474567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22393817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.895819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021014591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027908169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606015604","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016-0015","title":"Deliberative freedoms and the asymmetric features of anti-discrimination law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Affirmative action; Political science; Value (mathematics); Employment discrimination; Plaintiff; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.029045542333470994,"score_gpt":0.2887452390489362,"score_spread":0.25969969671546517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606015604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012341371,0.0005796988,0.00014317992,0.007843803,0.00015862928,0.000060942257,0.000009623782,0.000003847323,0.9788589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872965,0.0005217175,0.00026043027,0.00008203762,0.00011328703,1.04759454e-8,2.3684734e-7,0.0000013342287,0.00029130137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993402,0.00018492622,0.00006873066,0.000054548887,0.0002443968,0.00010720556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992333,0.00019279866,0.0001885826,0.00009921238,0.00020557408,0.00008051105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069929665,0.00004017542,0.00012293542,0.000010065012,0.0026736017,0.00006142055,0.00033714296,0.000071601135,0.00004905423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022237115,0.000031924144,0.00006646269,0.000011655553,0.0035057003,0.0006510239,0.00006478674,0.00015058246,4.4090314e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042941654,0.000016763412,0.00005557605,0.0000042647544,0.000024706203,0.000002603598,0.0129296975,8.317177e-7,0.00000838914,0.9858474,0.00014172656,0.00092510943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004061701,0.00018673041,0.05392794,0.00013131078,0.00027131787,0.000014058264,0.05413785,0.000041779742,0.00031801456,0.85613394,0.030542009,0.00023337672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28008452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22642767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98638827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006522768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041748488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625816929","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.9","title":"POSITIVISM AND PRACTICE BEYOND SOVEREIGNTY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Sovereignty; International law; Political science; Law; Legal positivism; International human rights law; Normative; Politics; Law and economics; Multinational corporation; Positivism; State (computer science); Sociology; Legal profession; Legal realism","score_opus":0.015485124074292273,"score_gpt":0.28586992215848017,"score_spread":0.2703847980841879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625816929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03043905,0.00008226796,0.0000652162,0.0012782773,0.0001748019,0.000027082207,0.0000043545497,0.0000045199095,0.9679244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892024,0.00014007428,0.00100724,0.00006899103,0.00018274407,4.6481947e-9,3.0158327e-7,0.0000016186372,0.00939666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949574,0.00008290742,0.000045292414,0.00006029922,0.00022312975,0.00009260161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993613,0.0000768394,0.00019352265,0.000074370415,0.000205155,0.00008885776],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039466427,0.000035324392,0.00006468153,0.0000058219043,0.003650071,0.00013618957,0.00027329117,0.00003818994,0.0011981255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057915913,0.000036690097,0.00003838807,0.0000012250929,0.00046382757,0.0016602625,0.000049406048,0.00006769195,0.000004872674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050169197,0.000020327365,0.000054159817,8.8873054e-7,0.000029490735,0.00004128844,0.0039096037,1.6889729e-7,0.0000137741945,0.99500054,0.00040799336,0.00047158176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093165593,0.0001037273,0.013536327,0.000041707706,0.00008280805,0.00007961431,0.007599869,0.000007157049,0.000028162514,0.25393805,0.72349083,0.00016007943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122591585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15397973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9587633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013371657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005555719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626596183","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0044","title":"Law as computation in the era of artificial legal intelligence: Speaking law to the power of statistics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Argumentation theory; Artificial intelligence; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Legal research; Philosophy of law; Legal profession; Computer science; Practice of law; Political science; Comparative law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03252342726147227,"score_gpt":0.3224076401534819,"score_spread":0.2898842128920096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626596183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24307711,0.00012882946,0.14162241,0.003788042,0.0015810379,0.0006480524,0.000069145746,0.000018945044,0.6090664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957277,0.000019783129,0.0037973584,0.00023240014,0.00018080951,4.998632e-8,7.4649546e-7,0.0000040497084,0.00003710058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983722,0.00038057874,0.00032997914,0.000108302025,0.0005991687,0.00020976285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986276,0.0003024812,0.00030963944,0.0001367971,0.0005563602,0.00006709106],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014573258,0.000077108525,0.00016681962,0.000018209581,0.00091658003,0.00005376614,0.0006861377,0.000064755775,0.0010585638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010308669,0.00006237174,0.000072949544,0.00012057183,0.0019951225,0.00044097326,0.00006773033,0.00020551398,0.0000204215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009775733,0.00006858744,0.00003991535,0.0000024935139,0.000013957105,0.000008864246,0.10684695,0.0005194341,0.0000936692,0.88606477,0.00025431288,0.0059893145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016960701,0.0012771481,0.00066284626,0.0002385754,0.000095995514,0.0000196507,0.64004576,0.0010749934,0.005434092,0.0752088,0.27543223,0.00034033458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4736112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8874978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8108559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018450322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001238522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726852703","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0025","title":"A right to deliberative freedom: Reply to Campbell and Smith","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Commit; Injustice; Action (physics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030717578137828588,"score_gpt":0.2920036532704029,"score_spread":0.2612860751325743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726852703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026833085,0.00011334801,0.00065140316,0.027518816,0.00027553507,0.000115143106,0.000014442044,0.000009364845,0.94446886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903791,0.00010003033,0.0038802417,0.001337235,0.00024113028,3.5940236e-8,9.503105e-8,0.0000032887474,0.004058864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992711,0.0001149312,0.00007037063,0.00011255045,0.00022056708,0.00021047001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897933,0.0000623314,0.000081503145,0.00015632981,0.0001886688,0.0005318642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004880146,0.000057581092,0.0001207141,0.000011488059,0.0031077059,0.00009835669,0.0003655329,0.000061583145,0.0003964613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021855578,0.000059085527,0.00004693938,0.000010147376,0.0005327808,0.0005495032,0.000098182645,0.00013743067,0.000013215917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007042907,0.000030407506,0.00027039374,0.000004018202,0.000033160766,0.00004336307,0.03196265,0.00000412816,0.000028697877,0.95993507,0.007146536,0.00047113505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000439904,0.00020328538,0.0027668,0.000060765648,0.000033990098,0.000006801392,0.00848218,0.000003779131,0.000056881632,0.042244826,0.9455392,0.00016161885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1830432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25475833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020426397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011204863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727723761","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0053","title":"Warming up to inscrutability: How technology could challenge our concept of law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Legitimacy; Principle of legality; Law and economics; Political science; Coercion (linguistics); Strengths and weaknesses; Intelligibility (philosophy); Law; Deception; Legislation; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044169528776786246,"score_gpt":0.32710228554090787,"score_spread":0.2829327567641216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727723761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25335032,0.00081376947,0.0006791158,0.12565252,0.0017139051,0.00035470445,0.000039483537,0.00008286848,0.6173133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774355,0.00021608523,0.0008463712,0.0001799126,0.00026928852,2.759399e-8,2.4201125e-7,0.0000049061514,0.0007395969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989447,0.0001383531,0.0001207975,0.00012739863,0.00038839667,0.00028036945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983681,0.000050508985,0.0002017912,0.0001415333,0.0010128473,0.00022522482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079551485,0.00007966028,0.00024357751,0.00003240052,0.0012829751,0.000039649913,0.0005154419,0.00026841162,0.0002613171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021781148,0.000090431226,0.00010204537,0.00006506737,0.0012895567,0.00068788056,0.00011577564,0.00025453235,0.0000036127567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050502855,0.00006495641,0.00014543773,0.000008013249,0.00006252511,0.000009580878,0.15307367,8.656135e-7,0.00037746824,0.840244,0.0012213142,0.0047417004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068921247,0.0007857492,0.00014860643,0.000094974006,0.000047674028,0.0000032462701,0.44073147,0.0000036397144,0.0009837077,0.017666379,0.53864104,0.00020430835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11829392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51243144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003429674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001994159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98677367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728244694","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r2","title":"<scp>abraham drassinower</scp> <i>What’s Wrong with Copying?</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.012816995225184417,"score_gpt":0.23019160042814166,"score_spread":0.21737460520295723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2728244694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03117885,0.0020280015,0.0001594637,0.0007628335,0.0010478424,0.000074398755,0.00000337109,0.000020018348,0.9647252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95888364,0.0045907563,0.0010262929,0.0001094068,0.00044279933,5.250726e-8,4.923279e-7,0.000009898514,0.034936633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.00006974496,0.000086617205,0.00012963683,0.0003785704,0.0002937956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990215,0.000062050676,0.00036121806,0.00021398418,0.00020457864,0.00013672492],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038386643,0.00009041178,0.00019396235,0.000013185062,0.00813812,0.00021496542,0.00065126,0.00007375242,0.0003935559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004431519,0.000091490896,0.000099342935,0.0000113083615,0.0013607795,0.0017945439,0.00009569099,0.00015012498,0.000011109222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014615028,0.00031815912,0.014952054,0.00003993801,0.00060876366,0.00063125725,0.28666106,0.00001993001,0.00014885626,0.42359316,0.24683453,0.026046144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005750404,0.00008103183,0.0054810583,0.00007406627,0.000049641225,0.0000075988464,0.103514545,0.0000028088675,0.000007577935,0.00014401526,0.89000815,0.000054468765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14643802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5805215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005656475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018407275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99315315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750682743","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.0","title":"INTRODUCING PATRICK MACKLEM, <i>THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS</i>: FOUR CONTEXTS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Sovereignty; International human rights law; International law; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public international law; Principle of legality; Skepticism; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.01580124053682205,"score_gpt":0.2647988976038668,"score_spread":0.24899765706704477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750682743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.264562,0.000063013154,0.00008706467,0.00054929435,0.00043878666,0.00008562376,0.000013576292,0.000007812528,0.7341928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910789,0.000014599008,0.00017403185,0.000017320868,0.00050612574,1.8553607e-8,7.1852037e-7,0.000002774975,0.008205486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990574,0.00012337982,0.00014568704,0.0000994786,0.0004130663,0.00016098886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875724,0.000052030144,0.00051443,0.0002211773,0.00037230804,0.000082788574],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059490587,0.00006622818,0.00015256989,0.0000138981095,0.006670192,0.000098378114,0.0009815014,0.000055805896,0.003977771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020521136,0.0000532042,0.00015255334,0.0000040568,0.00076181616,0.0007518751,0.00008239247,0.00013590702,0.0000066706107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030266796,0.000028837074,0.00035487377,0.0000028368715,0.00005060086,0.000017330252,0.0038621945,0.0000023674027,0.00006163032,0.9940321,0.0013725982,0.0001843958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002122377,0.00023312225,0.020278923,0.00013955228,0.00015700686,0.000020330102,0.0025147405,0.000013095971,0.0005915712,0.44969454,0.5239293,0.00030542843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29890501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6437768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7265169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002068681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005841674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99693274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751690197","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.3","title":"THE USES AND LIMITS OF LEGALISM: ON PATRICK MACKLEM’S <i>THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; International human rights law; Political science; Sovereignty; International law; Legalism (Western philosophy); Reservation of rights; Principle of legality; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Politics; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022138986569685982,"score_gpt":0.2796053056703029,"score_spread":0.2574663191006169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751690197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49166983,0.000095689524,0.000004324625,0.00044113162,0.00017007628,0.000057909798,0.000014726722,0.0000025291474,0.5075438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949718,0.000080308084,0.000028818686,0.000012818815,0.00012681383,1.4895011e-8,2.8647153e-7,0.0000017138085,0.004777385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927455,0.00010249352,0.00011188873,0.00006078962,0.00034808036,0.00010221271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990322,0.00011259575,0.0004242613,0.00015100952,0.00023102299,0.000048917183],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040514724,0.000050303453,0.00010826483,0.000008560509,0.0054362617,0.00006651179,0.000657607,0.00003994218,0.00038224307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001466059,0.000031567964,0.00008883901,0.000003313116,0.0010744367,0.00035745156,0.0000464865,0.000088323526,9.2000477e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004608998,0.000026276939,0.00026466048,0.0000023410614,0.000037938134,0.0000034461798,0.0028997883,7.496001e-7,0.00003598284,0.99586064,0.000716096,0.00010597569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014798426,0.0004776306,0.0349005,0.0001558096,0.00014321589,0.0000084907715,0.0044486136,0.000005304132,0.0014596375,0.3793127,0.57740253,0.0002057015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14449953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.560201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61654794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073836454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003738774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99585855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751766599","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0098","title":"Parenthood is a fiduciary relationship","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Law; Possession (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Discretion; Sociology; Epistemology; Duty; Philosophy; Geography; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0440035289107704,"score_gpt":0.2702720190051765,"score_spread":0.2262684900944061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751766599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026929138,0.000495109,0.0026511175,0.03987712,0.00009445217,0.00011767703,0.0000287409,0.000040447318,0.9297662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750996,0.00015143878,0.0011967816,0.00031513738,0.00015148171,1.9919336e-8,8.0991407e-7,0.0000018769814,0.00067247555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954957,0.000059271642,0.00006561951,0.000066814,0.00016535743,0.00009334341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995884,0.000034411438,0.0000821764,0.000052666197,0.000071942835,0.00017042302],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013294967,0.00003138979,0.00006106746,0.000003714411,0.0010142094,0.000022546124,0.00022323692,0.00003747465,0.0022943635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028549619,0.000036466,0.00006864557,0.000032551994,0.00010728096,0.0003539581,0.00003426447,0.00009577893,0.00002864036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025244693,0.000050218096,0.008063738,0.0000052013847,0.00003023632,0.000008769085,0.08332038,0.000014161964,0.0000381613,0.88318235,0.023272488,0.0019890417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020456286,0.000023088567,0.007005219,0.000007221875,0.000022162376,0.0000010490347,0.023953924,0.00003154072,0.00000917453,0.0014212144,0.96726274,0.000058070556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03759274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04619371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107168045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008685077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752463403","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.4","title":"INTERNATIONAL LABOUR RIGHTS: LEGITIMIZING THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Globalization; Political science; Normative; International law; Labour law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Law; Order (exchange); International human rights law; Surrender; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.015372209847331482,"score_gpt":0.27139438449897346,"score_spread":0.25602217465164195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752463403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00969975,0.000036000543,0.00040044184,0.016782725,0.0029255494,0.00005532406,0.000028993176,0.000015696265,0.9700555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702183,0.0002997562,0.0011789831,0.00025583254,0.0011333955,9.120983e-8,0.0000038181215,0.000004508357,0.026905296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988699,0.00006434633,0.00012397823,0.000108445434,0.0006636386,0.0001696759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987754,0.00004709529,0.00030130605,0.00016184823,0.0006290675,0.00008525427],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005467992,0.00007229258,0.00009056518,0.00001784905,0.003945647,0.0004805663,0.002044388,0.00005372671,0.006885709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008592124,0.00006264579,0.000109418594,0.000010795971,0.00051541993,0.0019466198,0.00017797278,0.00015788134,0.000018694285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006243458,0.000040624607,0.0006942747,6.292014e-7,0.00012974048,0.000036784306,0.002177112,0.00001915498,0.000038763814,0.99030566,0.0055187796,0.0009760517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047443493,0.0000150716205,0.0019439836,0.000022552164,0.000014776737,0.000012909505,0.0032213791,0.000057624467,0.000029656358,0.0019472736,0.9921835,0.00007686023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36815014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46442577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044547112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010403651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752495212","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.2","title":"THE SOVEREIGNTY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Education, Technology, and Economics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Human rights; Law; International human rights law; Derogation; Political science; International law; Sovereignty; Municipal law; Public international law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.013221514315147957,"score_gpt":0.22559015170309074,"score_spread":0.2123686373879428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752495212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056214865,0.0004587827,0.017960357,0.0058992617,0.0027985687,0.000057385245,0.0000074167806,0.000025167019,0.9165782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940512,0.0004392461,0.004826065,0.0000201399,0.000056842797,1.0398791e-8,1.7304662e-7,0.0000010874196,0.00060519576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969596,0.000011972018,0.00008058621,0.00006370673,0.00007201624,0.0000757371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918747,0.000027164699,0.00029510912,0.00034717377,0.000110865956,0.000032225602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021937488,0.000033509823,0.00006263718,0.0000068737163,0.0009011612,0.00007611164,0.001965364,0.000033370005,0.000110782814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015285843,0.000030669526,0.000054235923,0.0000034223942,0.0002907098,0.0008733487,0.00023183737,0.00006597794,0.0000023867615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005342448,0.000018062774,0.0013828196,8.078481e-7,0.00002919314,0.0000011807037,0.00037800008,0.0000063558696,0.000017979582,0.9942024,0.0005434138,0.003414458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002158544,0.00024946197,0.08465128,0.000070689035,0.000042399526,0.00016697175,0.010314555,0.0045725913,0.001934038,0.2790301,0.61644423,0.00036515933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067791087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03730154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93783635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106398336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037849448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753253894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.8","title":"HUMAN RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW? THE FORGOTTEN ORIGINS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN LATIN AMERICA","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Political science; Reservation of rights; International law; Right to property; Solidarity; Public international law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0224146321648271,"score_gpt":0.22995041688503107,"score_spread":0.20753578472020395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753253894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25071293,0.000017665465,0.000006526888,0.0003549685,0.00021600006,0.00005037637,0.000028047722,0.000004826292,0.74860865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201226,0.0000016592003,0.00004164671,0.000031931264,0.00017210397,8.082919e-8,0.0000042970223,0.0000026143512,0.007733412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992839,0.000052150885,0.0002214932,0.00009660635,0.00019500716,0.0001508602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938345,0.00002603293,0.0002562906,0.00018108974,0.00008881157,0.00006432853],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010673645,0.00008609629,0.00020140583,0.000029281542,0.0016168369,0.000057217196,0.00065417914,0.00003711816,0.0018003684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000028114343,0.0000652189,0.00010410483,0.0000051952597,0.0007491109,0.0005780324,0.000080399965,0.00018863188,0.0000044700873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021143886,0.00011961258,0.00050703995,0.000004071497,0.000026756175,0.000038094357,0.0055474024,0.0000024601031,0.000015853486,0.99336326,0.00030004393,0.000054266624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080924685,0.0001212245,0.0047983225,0.0000597884,0.000015014175,0.0000017687863,0.00095905236,0.00009434232,0.0000061473866,0.040697422,0.952331,0.00010669272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68907696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9055161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9526658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043648077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011804204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753533019","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.5","title":"THE POLITICS OF INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS RIGHTS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Declaration; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Political science; International human rights law; Indigenous rights; Politics; Law; Right to property; Linguistic rights; Latin Americans; Negotiation; Fundamental rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.015373165803747504,"score_gpt":0.26151575339568883,"score_spread":0.24614258759194133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753533019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19184323,0.00017853768,0.000084770254,0.00074992975,0.0007787663,0.00004951702,0.0000055462197,0.00000438876,0.8063053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857157,0.00034733783,0.00044086692,0.0000072811617,0.00014457469,5.863956e-9,2.3666583e-7,0.0000010189073,0.013342996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994726,0.000035192814,0.000074711315,0.00003657447,0.00026947062,0.00011142186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939764,0.000026776308,0.00022536928,0.00009820566,0.00018307316,0.000068918314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030226703,0.00002860794,0.00005917459,0.0000062910594,0.0059103165,0.00007107185,0.00069439004,0.000028839951,0.00069373194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012731442,0.000020581972,0.00004932228,0.0000025598156,0.0005678821,0.0002933288,0.000054492662,0.000049235212,0.000003029725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014963654,0.00003203639,0.0013179159,9.888678e-7,0.00006783942,0.000016898868,0.05309889,6.688923e-7,0.0000052049095,0.9421329,0.0013323146,0.0019793613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021952421,0.000019050016,0.012896991,0.0000129425425,0.000008519365,0.0000023818998,0.0068532587,0.0000013705892,0.000028564937,0.016884882,0.9630326,0.00003992645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20301378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5211364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96170026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002143091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013332938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99538386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765588717","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0012","title":"The definitive article","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Statute; Jurisdiction; Institution; Criminal jurisdiction; Criminal code; Criminal procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.03692326805195515,"score_gpt":0.3321777794202439,"score_spread":0.29525451136828873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765588717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012912059,0.000082807135,0.00008205839,0.037117027,0.0003734079,0.00002546737,0.000001185761,0.0000046116556,0.9494014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457973,0.0003303173,0.00034890018,0.000081832186,0.000107763306,1.3385615e-8,8.7447404e-8,9.245423e-7,0.0045504454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962705,0.000080744496,0.00004506468,0.000029781426,0.00013195314,0.000085407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992934,0.00012054948,0.00018468926,0.000105760664,0.00023938052,0.000056205747],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005388833,0.000018970606,0.000029938083,0.000002871229,0.008910856,0.0002490132,0.00032499628,0.000020432833,0.0010718673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000348635,0.000016670905,0.000030134235,0.000008629094,0.00046409955,0.0013249757,0.000023483477,0.00012139267,0.000020569054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014614402,0.000019332876,0.00075199007,2.1731151e-7,0.000013904816,0.0000021068827,0.013810148,2.829661e-7,0.000012196879,0.9731984,0.005306138,0.006870631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223498,0.000009595626,0.011675894,0.000003400812,0.000008941213,0.0000016716851,0.053558633,0.0000022924005,0.000011308525,0.0033404953,0.9312413,0.000024132292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22984788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55185914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98166764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011214807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023122744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766014730","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017.67.4.r1","title":"MANAGING THE GOVERNANCE GAP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Operationalization; Human rights; Due diligence; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Ex-ante; Corporate social responsibility; Political science; Liability; Law; State (computer science); Closing (real estate); Public international law; Business; International law; Economics","score_opus":0.019640618463702908,"score_gpt":0.19421891205855069,"score_spread":0.17457829359484778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766014730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06574134,0.00026804968,0.0002061626,0.003215447,0.00054758275,0.00006132733,0.000001333816,0.000018970297,0.9299398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950189,0.0001045141,0.00007392878,0.00017978014,0.0006836383,1.2661099e-8,5.0014813e-7,0.0000048456477,0.003933864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995451,0.000004877685,0.00007170134,0.00008155845,0.0001688441,0.00012790815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991375,0.000007392732,0.00046323205,0.00027686945,0.000104050705,0.00001093836],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016754729,0.00006818185,0.00009740533,0.00000606697,0.0027234978,0.00034870696,0.00079047447,0.000021958542,0.0018103766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000034726677,0.000052594696,0.000085660664,0.000006417582,0.0001850661,0.0022015912,0.00020674228,0.000095003015,0.00004978458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003723509,0.00001743043,0.0010368866,0.000014060881,0.000027748245,0.000062890605,0.0000945509,0.000007940863,0.000018996712,0.98670536,0.007389374,0.004587504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006663043,0.000008137254,0.046616115,0.00006659507,0.00007219891,0.000010617471,0.00056863815,0.00033578777,0.0000058917635,0.0795334,0.8719759,0.00014042221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042964563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17227277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9292776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057148456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009042189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766092601","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0028","title":"Thinking like a private lawyer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Relation (database); Tort; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Centrality; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy; Liability; History","score_opus":0.021583469122099904,"score_gpt":0.27689184325087796,"score_spread":0.25530837412877805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766092601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039311863,0.00010907461,0.00079284987,0.003479361,0.00019419807,0.000062574225,0.0000040213017,0.00001772734,0.95602834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935752,0.00027817528,0.0024367638,0.00005957237,0.00015854344,1.7204803e-8,2.2431773e-7,0.0000022684735,0.003489219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950564,0.000033529635,0.000053426043,0.00006288055,0.0002185894,0.00012595295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945086,0.000014063616,0.00018408107,0.00016981736,0.00007931097,0.00010187856],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003486703,0.000034771925,0.00006873216,0.0000042277156,0.005144157,0.00015255371,0.00076701125,0.00004079227,0.000835515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015718393,0.00003727581,0.0000681451,0.0000055658697,0.00029542317,0.00075595116,0.00012385561,0.00008711915,0.000012878732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008602111,0.000023526494,0.0017116589,0.0000015221674,0.000018284283,0.0000089343885,0.008950232,0.0000025370796,0.000059038273,0.98630875,0.00111225,0.0017946736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020269134,0.000010469984,0.009041224,0.000015177178,0.000014223873,0.0000018647607,0.0036253738,0.0000075496528,0.000008752191,0.0044213217,0.9825984,0.00005292656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15918298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33406502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014928663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054650372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99615103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767613032","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0052","title":"How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Work (physics); Legal profession; Affect (linguistics); Public relations; Law; Software; Computer science; Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.042783489009042025,"score_gpt":0.32148663866148397,"score_spread":0.2787031496524419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767613032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01397637,0.0005442279,0.037720922,0.014469263,0.0017346393,0.0003703826,0.0000125338665,0.00004562426,0.93112606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961477,0.00022657127,0.002351568,0.0001392925,0.0006155136,4.6189875e-8,2.2588104e-7,0.0000056498307,0.0005134221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982952,0.00051911274,0.00019250768,0.00014002538,0.00057609455,0.000277099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978146,0.0005486065,0.00043081355,0.00021657074,0.00085873145,0.00013071038],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001577372,0.000093081915,0.00017306257,0.000015145772,0.001989271,0.00010427688,0.0008351413,0.00010242586,0.001337569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045667213,0.0000819884,0.00014684351,0.0000811011,0.0041620536,0.0019706546,0.00009623393,0.00019762515,0.000020289657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013389972,0.000075534124,0.00001625087,0.0000027986866,0.00004133823,0.000010697682,0.032056358,0.000010620082,0.00033993638,0.95510465,0.0003585725,0.01184932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035788617,0.0003505333,0.000014455115,0.000045175355,0.00008973423,0.000015366713,0.16479744,0.000075842334,0.006761371,0.021194128,0.8064788,0.00014138126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16823682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4977717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98217136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024986255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012263193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768011231","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0056","title":"Prediction, persuasion, and the jurisprudence of behaviourism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Jurisprudence; Predictive analytics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Meaning (existential); Software deployment; Analytics; Data science; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023314108959790494,"score_gpt":0.2745674372997067,"score_spread":0.2512533283399162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768011231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69329673,0.0011434485,0.0044817063,0.0028283512,0.0011013151,0.0002699851,0.00001598912,0.000030893367,0.29683158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801624,0.00063884386,0.0005233155,0.000023091496,0.00020882588,2.0895646e-8,1.0304346e-7,0.0000019599036,0.000587608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992287,0.00016991429,0.00012477768,0.000071839786,0.000290476,0.00011429917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918365,0.00007158574,0.00016674324,0.000089749505,0.00040830657,0.00007994202],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084866607,0.00004138643,0.00010100819,0.000009827667,0.0013916803,0.000018309422,0.00030655428,0.000055984867,0.0012939513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006714342,0.00003466882,0.000058433805,0.00003107289,0.004167662,0.00042064718,0.000054117452,0.00008218717,0.0000033286983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041019995,0.0000917783,0.0075112954,0.000005074727,0.000055586384,0.000008320487,0.23999329,0.0000044595963,0.000282539,0.7365386,0.004216265,0.010882625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016383458,0.0007211234,0.022037473,0.00019536943,0.0003307404,0.00004606521,0.4183176,0.00027078248,0.002000943,0.021282267,0.53284925,0.0003100473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19942537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19622883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7152563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090640606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006695767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768384443","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0075","title":"The banishment of Isaac: Racial signifiers of gender performance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Harm; Ethnic group; Transgender; Sociology; Reading (process); Race (biology); Construct (python library); Gaze; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021118522644930457,"score_gpt":0.24558049977424562,"score_spread":0.22446197712931515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768384443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51106703,0.0030680893,0.00020056746,0.00014244426,0.00053913466,0.00008449204,0.0000054032867,0.0000050836393,0.48488778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789536,0.0009252714,0.0001824711,0.000016422338,0.00015754341,1.2849523e-8,8.5714085e-8,0.0000015501461,0.00082125515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993293,0.000073222145,0.00011045839,0.000050714647,0.00028974435,0.00014653473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993516,0.000036598878,0.00020673599,0.000066292574,0.000281517,0.00005725756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044142077,0.000042601387,0.00011004428,0.0000073833803,0.0010380988,0.000008052454,0.0002720312,0.000032540574,0.0001687929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015813488,0.000035657242,0.00007588145,0.000020495796,0.0010996084,0.00023712024,0.000053851552,0.000048193808,0.0000026663508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011417151,0.00035340677,0.10970033,0.00008842586,0.000997298,0.000012351877,0.3144229,0.000014098494,0.0018458872,0.38153905,0.009308174,0.18057637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001333776,0.0007244463,0.034042723,0.00008159009,0.00013768712,0.000003863727,0.4639931,0.000021554677,0.0017848696,0.0010681461,0.49661288,0.00019536373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015946187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1213994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4873047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010039661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008075237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782332759","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0102","title":"Introduction: Artificial intelligence, technology, and the law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Democracy; Economic Justice; Legal research; Legal writing; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Legal profession; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021076920366314835,"score_gpt":0.2759681546717757,"score_spread":0.2548912343054609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782332759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022918787,0.0010263432,0.01803556,0.07714097,0.0027485287,0.00037051726,0.000004857731,0.00011842337,0.877636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537385,0.00030253938,0.0015526838,0.00010047892,0.0019244606,6.681411e-8,1.5996619e-7,0.0000037317445,0.00074201066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990615,0.0001749439,0.00016677349,0.00013827307,0.00024597024,0.00021251648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991495,0.000083176295,0.00015005433,0.0001527364,0.00037661396,0.00008794394],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010455127,0.00006968075,0.00014042338,0.00003096135,0.0030794465,0.000068634006,0.0004572521,0.00011116785,0.0034231371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001000941,0.000060035443,0.00006362522,0.00012848302,0.0119299665,0.00052930316,0.000096188516,0.00018300326,0.000048214853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011882929,0.000019533203,0.000016544393,7.939902e-7,0.000019927082,0.0000033554275,0.011389065,0.0000022291638,0.00003206561,0.9717388,0.0008401798,0.015818685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061588944,0.0000895593,0.0000059712875,0.000009920781,0.00003220986,0.00001976395,0.10069394,0.000052074647,0.0008852275,0.18248595,0.71558,0.00008380435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066537604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46770182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001536414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055930064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783051054","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0080","title":"The origins of gender identity and gender expression in Anglo-American legal discourse","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Human rights; Identity (music); Law; Scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Human sexuality; Gender studies; Parliament; Expression (computer science); Politics","score_opus":0.0339511753438979,"score_gpt":0.3530585936606168,"score_spread":0.3191074183167189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783051054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9075573,0.001042366,0.00033625902,0.00028494486,0.00052919716,0.00006884053,0.000013402589,0.000005605556,0.09016208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975833,0.00091228314,0.0002576209,0.00004328973,0.00025933597,4.5807923e-8,5.5920344e-7,0.0000057120255,0.00093782885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990565,0.00021241016,0.00016936816,0.00012652269,0.00019692318,0.00023827632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926734,0.00004555577,0.00025502974,0.00019713497,0.00010668751,0.0001282281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003644269,0.0000806307,0.00016579912,0.00003541166,0.0005020568,0.00002571749,0.00029353148,0.000054628756,0.0006820999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000099935605,0.000068204885,0.00006550314,0.000046485566,0.00086910266,0.0005785836,0.0000856273,0.0001630556,0.000007985965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011391703,0.00062665774,0.4104401,0.00016116018,0.0002740872,0.00015140887,0.039259367,0.0000029680928,0.0012004366,0.5074908,0.027021836,0.012231981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015364719,0.00027721073,0.9225078,0.000017533257,0.00008415705,0.00009090662,0.018063454,0.000008946182,0.000027138458,0.0018604295,0.055375595,0.00015031242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2901726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31536528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51206774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024569602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069791335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74685156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784182983","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0057","title":"Don’t be so hateful: The insufficiency of anti-discrimination and hate crime laws in improving trans well-being","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hate crime; Harassment; Emancipation; Law; Identity (music); Political science; Criminology; Racism; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015119211946833373,"score_gpt":0.27759004219038663,"score_spread":0.2624708302435533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784182983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.861074,0.0006090584,0.00039309796,0.0011309788,0.00035917095,0.000101821985,0.000006101181,0.000007718411,0.13631807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833655,0.0005021071,0.00015382966,0.00010306643,0.00012579982,4.052789e-8,8.6989974e-7,0.000006281784,0.00077142956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909633,0.0001745161,0.00020794099,0.00013450295,0.00015403736,0.00023265491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993959,0.000044785535,0.0002164613,0.00014827304,0.00011834488,0.00007623471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005010032,0.000086113,0.0001709515,0.00005984351,0.00059116445,0.000027999573,0.0002648354,0.00008690511,0.0007668764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010234051,0.000078640056,0.000062671636,0.000045496217,0.00050052284,0.0004265946,0.000042911543,0.00017262662,0.0000034593804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009799722,0.0025353148,0.1259648,0.0011259901,0.00028282843,0.0001640995,0.4215263,0.000022416867,0.010795976,0.37401757,0.0058097206,0.056775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003524045,0.0013643753,0.93462825,0.00010730629,0.00025719337,0.00013832739,0.030887911,0.00026288905,0.00027990236,0.0015053661,0.026735714,0.00030872042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32226056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2278654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8086634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001184321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000637173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83967584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784246330","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0073","title":"Gender identity, gender pronouns, and freedom of expression: Bill C-16 and the traction of specious legal claims","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Law; Political science; Politics; Legislature; Human rights; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Binary opposition; Freedom of expression; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012049845758129975,"score_gpt":0.20870440582891384,"score_spread":0.19665456007078386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784246330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.664889,0.0019427731,0.28668308,0.00046453648,0.0012194556,0.0003950354,0.000006562158,0.000035770016,0.044363786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406236,0.00036219534,0.005316037,0.000011190591,0.00010611956,3.4172547e-8,1.504878e-7,0.000002460206,0.00013946924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992906,0.00009564148,0.00014041994,0.00012436367,0.00024932245,0.00009968758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993157,0.000027983524,0.00024962414,0.00016168278,0.00018073269,0.00006427892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037003224,0.000066214394,0.00014485631,0.000026998981,0.0003126725,0.000045555615,0.00028820455,0.000052235486,0.0001051629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065195763,0.00004698649,0.00005905089,0.000033736742,0.00042424022,0.0013581285,0.00014280083,0.00010172051,7.658522e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004580035,0.0010513341,0.006944127,0.00038566027,0.0011037352,0.0001570458,0.070703596,0.0001363843,0.13473095,0.6599151,0.01147172,0.108820304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06495672,0.007937754,0.2690329,0.001125568,0.0013889804,0.009125821,0.06635905,0.02214744,0.18837106,0.1452767,0.22134325,0.0029347613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009040934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006752939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5146384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056137178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000335404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785765963","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0021","title":"Group rights, participatory goods, and language policy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Public good; Law and economics; Citizen journalism; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.036511443260439716,"score_gpt":0.31385319758550745,"score_spread":0.27734175432506775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785765963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11026502,0.00045657845,0.00010933908,0.0029216441,0.00017188568,0.00003909028,0.000009211154,0.000022225013,0.886005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981021,0.000106712185,0.00031670043,0.0002129752,0.0008463835,8.253385e-9,2.4733936e-7,0.0000018288404,0.0004130202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993207,0.00015360562,0.000062136736,0.00006750197,0.00018155317,0.00021449979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995008,0.00005585436,0.00005095218,0.00006284948,0.00006144959,0.00026808647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039988963,0.000043845674,0.00008521261,0.000012326829,0.0012208759,0.000020583193,0.00015801295,0.00007964479,0.0006690597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004492837,0.000044715252,0.000041530122,0.00002148614,0.0014563998,0.00037596267,0.00004051352,0.000113480055,0.000009271607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018483654,0.00002339092,0.000111188245,0.0000026218163,0.000014751299,0.000012229676,0.027492028,2.461113e-8,0.000040432133,0.97138125,0.00038756407,0.0005160363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007776552,0.00028166824,0.0036738203,0.000051376446,0.000065879176,0.0000127276135,0.03226962,0.000008723707,0.000095048665,0.2454665,0.7170879,0.00020904817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31903186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36922953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016891213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007467379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93901134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787245113","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0030","title":"Overcoming Dicey in administrative law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Administrative law; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Public law; Delegation; Legislature; Judicial review; Accountability","score_opus":0.033788770659844036,"score_gpt":0.310458407285915,"score_spread":0.27666963662607097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787245113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06458178,0.000053876225,0.0002264036,0.00086195325,0.00007221859,0.000052695104,0.0000054255233,0.000007862752,0.93413776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978219,0.00006218914,0.0010167074,0.00006521752,0.00015925382,2.3320506e-8,2.957163e-7,0.0000016105623,0.00087280397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952054,0.00006513374,0.00007318147,0.0000673253,0.00014530578,0.00012851364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963856,0.000034128563,0.0000818943,0.000060136954,0.000091071146,0.000094206895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026170234,0.000035476336,0.00007283788,0.0000067348083,0.0009142323,0.000026774887,0.00022289669,0.000040583036,0.0012915903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009998366,0.00004012571,0.000041731535,0.000027939808,0.0005018329,0.0004701572,0.000035323203,0.00008263309,0.000011044281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020136713,0.000038091985,0.00051449105,9.2710184e-7,0.0000075815424,0.0000067898,0.016700927,8.2659847e-7,0.000082802384,0.9817975,0.00030879534,0.0005211427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003449456,0.0000678514,0.0031429764,0.000023588485,0.00000938712,0.0000024487965,0.031146262,0.000014513407,0.00007344619,0.0027694968,0.96233267,0.000072413015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32913256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90107924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002713664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009364258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787708624","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0069","title":"The proper role of policy in private law adjudication","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Statutory law; Private law; Law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Politics; Law and economics; Opposition (politics); Sociology","score_opus":0.009596039025498703,"score_gpt":0.2588751311499375,"score_spread":0.24927909212443877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787708624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10903688,0.00026600872,0.00012623894,0.0038874403,0.000040430135,0.00013490186,0.0000042451247,0.0000075513663,0.8864963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987135,0.00028336936,0.00030602168,0.000023166762,0.00013316945,5.3319795e-8,1.9339144e-7,0.0000014130197,0.00053912535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995642,0.00006423785,0.000080099606,0.000045220724,0.00014399245,0.000102274054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961084,0.000023171408,0.000118579665,0.00008465171,0.000114670496,0.000048081856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032342097,0.000025305939,0.00005109403,0.000007500936,0.0008890683,0.000015777625,0.00029958473,0.000028585897,0.0001394952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018787921,0.000020906404,0.000031878913,0.00004405555,0.0007693702,0.00025519822,0.00004318214,0.000052571824,0.0000053477293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013495173,0.000023183899,0.0004042233,6.9440813e-7,0.0000055641044,1.5610344e-7,0.0077502476,0.0000014193358,0.00047349877,0.98830014,0.00007731818,0.002950036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017575084,0.000033607725,0.006774125,0.00001247845,0.0000057752627,5.9972933e-7,0.010492092,0.00002071726,0.00028377838,0.008882193,0.97328395,0.00003491908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33601534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61236864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001991929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103854174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68380845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790078636","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0047","title":"Transformative legal technology and the rule of law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Economic Justice; Cognition; Rule of law; Law; Legal profession; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.006344534758098222,"score_gpt":0.22562990034735253,"score_spread":0.21928536558925432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790078636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037817318,0.00081250677,0.0001747432,0.0058046696,0.00011631283,0.00007416491,0.000006624188,0.000011515903,0.95518214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976413,0.00066991494,0.0005537692,0.000092342874,0.00007531014,1.7693887e-8,1.2596988e-7,0.000001125348,0.00096606085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995696,0.000078525576,0.00006580374,0.00004109892,0.00014614698,0.00009883149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996272,0.000025675614,0.00009108842,0.000046661255,0.00017118391,0.000038208324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034294548,0.000035651585,0.00010535114,0.0000023926752,0.0013208608,0.000013002302,0.00023174797,0.00008831288,0.0004866415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007148132,0.000026127587,0.00006837971,0.000034079818,0.0047647445,0.0004297449,0.000024226389,0.00010335243,0.0000012479812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005349949,0.000011165474,0.00001580215,0.000002149468,0.00003395285,9.458473e-7,0.111388616,1.3584621e-7,0.000042207223,0.8874814,0.0003839713,0.0005861378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010153104,0.00007188071,0.00005239706,0.00001901541,0.00003977076,0.00000931207,0.17524797,0.0000033316926,0.0002883992,0.014495955,0.80871063,0.000046043002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039038952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14071606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.959824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057579287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035097753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799704751","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0055","title":"Canadian legislatures and the regulation of the private health-care industry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Public administration; Health care; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01594424963709182,"score_gpt":0.21152415081458112,"score_spread":0.1955799011774893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799704751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25138226,0.01457726,0.000454045,0.16081509,0.001285304,0.0007205718,0.00022214711,0.000011622678,0.57053167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984884,0.0002303649,0.0001599407,0.0006406859,0.000077286335,2.532265e-8,4.6093285e-7,0.0000020954615,0.00040069598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996232,0.000036378275,0.00014034503,0.000060980135,0.000026557645,0.00011255485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947166,0.00001016691,0.00027079703,0.00012957843,0.000039239618,0.00007852431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034384136,0.000036480735,0.00011617957,0.000021349699,0.00047860757,0.00001136362,0.00017498367,0.00006245873,0.00019173058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013607804,0.00002956221,0.000042343654,0.000024510238,0.00020612379,0.0001262482,0.000044892895,0.00012717494,0.0000014920515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022984646,0.000003174699,0.0026158844,0.0000150953865,0.000025855536,2.1454592e-7,0.0064388025,0.000004967004,3.8567907e-7,0.98708487,0.0021331364,0.0016546206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070191734,0.00005463205,0.14118828,0.000034529847,0.00000575564,0.000004189217,0.002387577,0.000054290023,0.0000065617023,0.008337549,0.84717375,0.000050989842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88073134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92663634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031028577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067194516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3681111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799817919","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0002","title":"Special advocates and amici curiae in national security proceedings in the United Kingdom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Perspective (graphical); Kingdom; Function (biology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02091117640454297,"score_gpt":0.2721191769183879,"score_spread":0.2512080005138449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799817919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63439965,0.000009466756,0.0000013243479,0.0004518078,0.000112691734,0.000041212425,0.0000020097862,0.0000023868101,0.36497945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815434,0.00002666983,0.000063080326,0.000082810315,0.0014435081,2.7444734e-8,9.0486793e-7,0.0000013113865,0.00022733478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993011,0.000059328606,0.0000871058,0.00006979365,0.00036880386,0.00011389907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948245,0.000046653964,0.00008393431,0.000016908125,0.00033533346,0.000034712662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007273628,0.00004162704,0.00006696661,0.000057885794,0.00057181955,0.000054175496,0.00026362896,0.000044172168,0.0008578088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003016734,0.000036287423,0.000024833822,0.000041002004,0.000469576,0.0004913638,0.000025436533,0.000113886184,0.000002591811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005105521,0.000029762643,0.0013197062,0.0000014497239,0.0000051847537,0.000005432416,0.034205575,3.0865098e-7,0.000003984972,0.9633628,0.000991644,0.000023070279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011407812,0.000110289155,0.034500197,0.00009416444,0.0000105491,0.000014359632,0.017942922,0.00008885636,0.000017186456,0.27503088,0.6709133,0.00013651978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10396387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63668716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68833196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029866555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007463517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9392405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800000445","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0062","title":"Legal pluralism? Indigenous rights as legal constructs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Legal research; Human rights; Legal culture; Legal realism; Citizenship; Sociology; Right to property; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.007006730574619357,"score_gpt":0.2341439601458829,"score_spread":0.22713722957126353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800000445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43217418,0.000088511224,0.000044202035,0.00015898734,0.0006352844,0.00009807448,0.000010253491,0.000027304519,0.5667632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857775,0.000098226636,0.0007466089,0.00010923657,0.00086225395,2.272834e-8,0.0000020387517,0.0000065515146,0.01239757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984267,0.00018500145,0.0001712582,0.00016967024,0.00053475186,0.0005126183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878454,0.000037688744,0.0002393462,0.00015306614,0.0004644974,0.00032084933],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004154955,0.00012846156,0.00023033569,0.00003325736,0.006248659,0.00015408477,0.00059417536,0.00015785391,0.007819959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009978775,0.00011905154,0.000146847,0.00005384066,0.0017219621,0.0013063704,0.00005201923,0.00019328791,0.00009627091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008093354,0.00006642876,0.00015145919,0.000002544936,0.00007918733,0.00032571945,0.11455302,5.122816e-7,0.000057893085,0.8820792,0.0016808185,0.0009222988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005561507,0.00027037106,0.00022652472,0.000021628082,0.00004602148,0.00015012994,0.01626799,0.0000010339103,0.00028057024,0.002459947,0.97954166,0.00017799466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87103814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9504003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006163581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000745765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99504507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800134484","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0059","title":"The choices we make and the world they create: Métis conflicts with Treaty One peoples in <i>MMF v Canada</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; Battle; Supreme court; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.00655182880691618,"score_gpt":0.18519983515282307,"score_spread":0.17864800634590688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800134484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14112312,0.005680805,0.000004477953,0.018169412,0.00029396708,0.00021243353,0.000029392657,0.0000102101385,0.8344762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95975363,0.0052670403,0.000040153012,0.00016245231,0.00018338393,9.7930375e-8,2.6020456e-7,0.0000037639404,0.03458922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992088,0.00017176403,0.000074793126,0.000078195844,0.00026739563,0.0001990478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993671,0.00020333787,0.0001150166,0.000090410234,0.00009386707,0.00013023838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044381098,0.000052087682,0.00012145551,0.000027924607,0.0036473102,0.00017042355,0.00029355288,0.000026800375,0.00042843158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002062744,0.000040114923,0.00003019179,0.000044798733,0.0020314802,0.00021034855,0.00002857282,0.00010620867,9.683175e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002081027,0.00010279517,0.010849354,0.000029723373,0.00038364544,0.00023923672,0.26473764,0.000009277446,0.000017236973,0.65232676,0.045485813,0.023737496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082855317,0.000027887332,0.018123502,0.000042584037,0.00003558644,0.000005544247,0.02434725,0.0000016926498,0.0000011092475,0.000111986985,0.95641595,0.00005837053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9109301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095944916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088221475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800268292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0001","title":"Reforming the bifurcated process under section 38 of the Canada Evidence Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Principal (computer security); Political science; Process (computing); Criticism; Law; Privilege (computing); Law and economics; Relation (database); Business; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02897294672493908,"score_gpt":0.2765586495432078,"score_spread":0.24758570281826872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800268292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92332846,0.0004116896,0.000099124125,0.008288348,0.0008907156,0.000121290024,0.0000023597488,0.000008621309,0.06684937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891883,0.00012654027,0.000017362694,0.000056816192,0.00018884256,1.7647903e-8,4.581374e-8,0.0000017032886,0.00068982504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914664,0.00013426339,0.000089755784,0.00006592308,0.00042445786,0.00013894757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991749,0.00008018989,0.00020608435,0.000107886946,0.0003738515,0.000057108482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005231846,0.00004458735,0.00007630163,0.0000050216613,0.0018156886,0.000016889748,0.0005472291,0.00003583606,0.00045504794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007810802,0.00002906646,0.000051157618,0.000067833236,0.0005736986,0.00067087554,0.000046281824,0.00010780911,5.464108e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002526351,0.00041060484,0.069352254,0.00042049418,0.0007980545,0.00007520409,0.60138947,0.0011711144,0.013390992,0.20790794,0.07059249,0.031965047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004629979,0.00029144637,0.058418203,0.0010875479,0.0002272189,0.00006191045,0.5444763,0.00010633627,0.0040636533,0.0014345399,0.38905755,0.00031233625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9803145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31846505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006294869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007738818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800941461","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0084","title":"The residue of <i>imperium</i>: Property and sovereignty on Indigenous lands","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Property law; Business; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.008602484312042346,"score_gpt":0.2231545530912251,"score_spread":0.21455206877918273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800941461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32697287,0.00031347506,0.00001584424,0.00031844748,0.00019052003,0.00013429079,0.000011061879,0.000009577749,0.6720339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941749,0.00133897,0.000112781825,0.000045655655,0.00021992535,2.1641807e-8,3.5424813e-7,0.0000036414474,0.004103745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914974,0.00014174705,0.000102240556,0.00008439595,0.00029210068,0.00022977314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993357,0.0000645176,0.00015939136,0.000111401605,0.00022698438,0.00010198162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060353364,0.000062703286,0.0001250209,0.000010158633,0.0040025814,0.00004220842,0.00030834856,0.00007100685,0.0004803539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014088805,0.000035959543,0.000054647528,0.000024781819,0.001056695,0.00018155521,0.00003718887,0.00009535637,0.0000028152604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061402016,0.0001544596,0.0019806153,0.000013660328,0.00012384108,0.00003033119,0.31002244,0.0000015331951,0.00017190907,0.67113423,0.0014425514,0.014310363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006254906,0.0008663967,0.004264951,0.0000456535,0.000037899026,0.00001478402,0.044266474,0.000003276165,0.00044708131,0.0018971438,0.9473942,0.0001366732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28135785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81734586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94595164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014786368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024138301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99729407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801425793","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0114","title":"The need to justify and limit procedural innovation in national security litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Legitimacy; Plaintiff; Value (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Procedural justice; Political science; State (computer science); Law; National security; Business; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.024272660860192585,"score_gpt":0.29378463912315755,"score_spread":0.26951197826296497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801425793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8450338,0.00010542753,0.000086040316,0.028796537,0.00021021685,0.00012838938,0.0000026280613,0.000009386705,0.12562753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990911,0.00007035555,0.0002799988,0.00013576743,0.0001721854,4.456345e-8,3.9932956e-7,0.0000010119843,0.0002491303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994228,0.000059723097,0.00009290507,0.000059294343,0.0002607578,0.00010454226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992606,0.00006094416,0.00007910267,0.000026708765,0.00052166986,0.000050968374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080456154,0.00003095103,0.000045404944,0.000020115902,0.0010456697,0.000049082522,0.00012930317,0.000034125584,0.000084858424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021416979,0.000029321505,0.000012776952,0.00008966441,0.0002990676,0.0005584361,0.000029005849,0.00006402183,0.000002668552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103212835,0.000012498974,0.0009714762,0.000004679754,0.0000050779786,0.00000153012,0.03054609,0.0000018905693,0.00017559138,0.9616012,0.0041841087,0.00239264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005352516,0.00023105343,0.034659084,0.00012418565,0.000018222987,0.000011708814,0.1103224,0.0001509172,0.00016054254,0.031928007,0.82170194,0.00015669779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04159879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5295134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9296732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002774054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012316334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9647833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802889441","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0110","title":"Honour in sovereignty: Can Crown consultation with Indigenous peoples erase Canada’s sovereignty deficit?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Law; Honour; Duty; Politics; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.010372781011870804,"score_gpt":0.22271116260188928,"score_spread":0.21233838159001847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802889441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8753838,0.000316444,0.000027410057,0.0005120767,0.00015190965,0.00019692286,0.000044959634,0.000015890157,0.123350605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840176,0.00028755123,0.00058938976,0.00007691149,0.00013965141,1.09181485e-7,0.0000028429329,0.000005235476,0.0004965393],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986734,0.00016571136,0.00014678643,0.00015217785,0.00049616105,0.00036578465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890286,0.00012758812,0.00023723408,0.00007351701,0.00047444878,0.00018438137],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002535942,0.00012152052,0.00022223745,0.000016892222,0.0022494874,0.000050154304,0.0002748374,0.0000772887,0.0010105706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000987762,0.00011237811,0.000046703837,0.00006525826,0.0006170838,0.00045475285,0.000043680764,0.00015372624,0.0000023817274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009913347,0.00025601475,0.0715934,0.000043031516,0.00039051537,0.00036940508,0.78993475,0.00012911233,0.00008590099,0.12848239,0.003492028,0.004232092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00275139,0.00029884034,0.117188655,0.00013755329,0.000092913026,0.000020733565,0.84605163,0.000012855885,0.00008040398,0.00050266925,0.0324044,0.00045795008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12797973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026639767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001633583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807847431","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0012","title":"The migration and evolution of programs to counter violent extremism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Violent extremism; Political science; China; Accountability; State (computer science); Criminology; Focus (optics); Political economy; Terrorism; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0113711688348157,"score_gpt":0.2528563701314315,"score_spread":0.24148520129661577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807847431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836232,0.00053277763,0.0028510934,0.0014136429,0.00040967294,0.00013186637,0.0000045381917,0.00001081841,0.011022387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990326,0.00032697755,0.00009062506,0.000030148405,0.00020052289,6.447479e-8,2.217694e-7,0.0000018483732,0.00031696793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930775,0.00009602486,0.00010396888,0.00007511899,0.00024741987,0.0001697112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938506,0.000035031917,0.000096371004,0.00007641435,0.00027458026,0.00013255244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039167402,0.000047745547,0.000078911326,0.000009398527,0.00077374483,0.00002971023,0.00020024572,0.00004744736,0.00009178836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020127582,0.00003978125,0.000043488206,0.000023801516,0.00062193454,0.00027920277,0.000031768497,0.00005280746,0.0000030771646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074151903,0.00031646749,0.04142239,0.000033786335,0.00014643112,0.0000121032335,0.6553103,0.0000018481531,0.0017686392,0.12869549,0.0054430272,0.16610801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005523359,0.0008177729,0.04377142,0.00028183238,0.00006515994,0.0000099544795,0.6277412,0.00012648515,0.000109189925,0.0019341016,0.32440677,0.00018373091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119756736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4678078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34805107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028751415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006111129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8861049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808225335","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0074","title":"The architectural metaphor and the decline of political conventions in the Supreme Court of Canada’s <i>Senate Reform Reference</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Nomination; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Political question; Campaign finance; Federalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.014169028608343584,"score_gpt":0.24523895859791522,"score_spread":0.23106992998957165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808225335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34074277,0.001858706,0.000017162904,0.0750688,0.00028066483,0.00026811758,0.000055743323,0.00000486848,0.5817032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987771,0.00039085958,0.00006855066,0.00018859735,0.00006086641,4.5170523e-8,4.501029e-7,0.0000010479021,0.00051251624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989892,0.00029909538,0.00013411396,0.000047660662,0.0003533926,0.0001765405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932915,0.00016524806,0.00013953724,0.000094171104,0.00021492588,0.000056964218],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001215445,0.000043784956,0.00012016578,0.0000015432198,0.0012558566,0.000015757778,0.00045502456,0.000042093132,0.000106834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047530386,0.000021303618,0.00007717815,0.000032917138,0.0027985722,0.0000985754,0.000054748973,0.00015553109,8.536566e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108935186,0.000015562202,0.00010922727,0.0000034363916,0.000050548908,0.000001256858,0.023515683,3.9885944e-7,0.000023449988,0.9740492,0.0019718441,0.00015042936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017334743,0.000108126886,0.006862217,0.00005906857,0.00013573884,0.000024482228,0.52742404,0.000021359205,0.00015162474,0.02379076,0.4395916,0.00009753787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9254316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9502585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018055548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027689367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808336711","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0010","title":"Counterterrorism on campus","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Terrorism; Radicalization; Political science; Academic freedom; Obligation; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Statutory law; Law; Power (physics); Duty to protect; Sociology; Public administration; Higher education; Politics","score_opus":0.01284545393768329,"score_gpt":0.2701861750362174,"score_spread":0.2573407210985341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808336711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42910954,0.00021272554,0.0011583266,0.0016822873,0.0025982577,0.000118290314,0.000021728143,0.00006292257,0.56503594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964443,0.00021452112,0.00005518369,0.0004154926,0.0009359624,3.2877097e-8,6.0523377e-7,0.000006167088,0.0019277544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987114,0.00017072071,0.00013907184,0.00015290159,0.0004494656,0.00037641806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990628,0.00006526214,0.00014321781,0.00016425054,0.00026605392,0.00029846778],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039241137,0.00010468817,0.00017037187,0.00002273767,0.0012180578,0.0000418738,0.00052339816,0.000117767886,0.0035542655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029390501,0.000109559776,0.00012358936,0.00003078237,0.00095848646,0.0005271081,0.00003934717,0.00017127104,0.00011707905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008144343,0.0005978051,0.002891342,0.000024594245,0.00024652042,0.0003249306,0.7551242,0.0000023642144,0.00032046382,0.14978197,0.054517604,0.035353754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008410873,0.0007630218,0.003208038,0.00015964307,0.00005310995,0.000023285718,0.37770504,0.000030806365,0.00007396261,0.0011650813,0.6157005,0.00027644163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0978264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19313966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5673347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048311552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001161552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287731110","doi":"10.3138/utlj.102412r","title":"Philosophical Interventions: Reviews 1986–2011","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Craft; Intermediary; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Psychology; History; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06107641061088669,"score_gpt":0.23340376554904171,"score_spread":0.17232735493815501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287731110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048616743,0.0049851816,0.00023235353,0.00828997,0.00033591874,0.0003348662,0.000027683498,0.00003635829,0.980896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98936343,0.0008965823,0.00088079233,0.00020890715,0.00077030406,7.131469e-7,0.000005395419,0.000007607906,0.007866244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.00005696124,0.00021149959,0.00009398682,0.00010204371,0.00011400986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936825,0.000017228866,0.00019799985,0.00015388482,0.0001546121,0.00010803015],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012124278,0.00008143722,0.00017526124,0.000017178258,0.0006445012,0.000059176513,0.00026930007,0.000032397347,0.05000426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000050260073,0.00007648835,0.00029420116,0.000005437288,0.0003003458,0.00074622023,0.000045854304,0.00012943185,0.00076679204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069201647,0.00011566065,0.0000078116855,0.000027884422,0.000038579354,0.0000026902658,0.0033869722,3.1031433e-7,0.000039099243,0.9679944,0.025159445,0.00322022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032397668,0.00010654162,0.00013217858,0.000136747,0.00006076437,0.000016934027,0.0022549452,0.000007878686,0.000007510164,0.067163326,0.92967,0.000119248885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008373061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009673121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058494352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010007761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889272343","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0033","title":"The hydraulics of constitutional claims: Multiplicity of actors in constitutional interpretation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional theory; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Constitutional law; Law; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.014521814287404579,"score_gpt":0.2579335399891207,"score_spread":0.24341172570171615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889272343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21530956,0.0010309651,0.011759384,0.0009660096,0.0009235602,0.00021231575,0.000056904777,0.000011698316,0.7697296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910545,0.00039977147,0.00035126595,0.000017148483,0.00009576378,5.4475283e-8,9.124984e-7,5.965487e-7,0.00002901977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991409,0.00011210369,0.00020601718,0.00006872427,0.0003487594,0.00012347527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892396,0.00020104974,0.00025155512,0.000047301968,0.0005259461,0.000050184954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049408275,0.000053210053,0.00014339418,0.000020721318,0.0011042258,0.0000075274434,0.00023245954,0.000055355133,0.00017787685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001306972,0.000047213358,0.000088134635,0.000059162634,0.016045975,0.00030678976,0.00005057797,0.000086445616,0.0000017889249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001633169,0.00006026755,0.009426483,0.0000022709814,0.00004999306,0.0000017562442,0.004234896,0.000041048366,0.00014531858,0.98448354,0.00013385741,0.0012572481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005618176,0.0008026239,0.1945497,0.0009911258,0.00026956835,0.000043760796,0.18088472,0.00081535365,0.0019341498,0.14136316,0.47197825,0.0007494391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05590909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35411203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8431204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002741351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049617974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890544174","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0029","title":"<i>Politeia’s</i> place in our practical life: Pierre Bourdieu on the modern state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; State (computer science); Politics; Epistemology; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04270725949400157,"score_gpt":0.3220995671569359,"score_spread":0.2793923076629343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890544174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033750188,0.000114212766,0.00026077282,0.08957533,0.00032975603,0.00010386179,0.00001658289,0.00001939612,0.8758299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634993,0.00017094842,0.00020354922,0.001445681,0.00047652426,2.966911e-8,2.2319335e-7,0.0000042008805,0.0013489138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850255,0.00046573576,0.0001178189,0.00011208456,0.00044066887,0.00036112402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903196,0.00027814115,0.00010518889,0.00012681299,0.00014614582,0.0003117486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011970502,0.00007542274,0.00012926228,0.000014943662,0.0010931742,0.00004614784,0.00034003437,0.000108094704,0.0003419132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040202457,0.000064871165,0.00007842623,0.000036983223,0.0006968665,0.00050869776,0.00006203816,0.00047559428,0.000034269742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023939618,0.000113040645,0.00008509372,0.000003154365,0.000028354367,0.00004163908,0.030477237,0.000013726716,0.000011138622,0.9609577,0.00771057,0.0003189225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013629084,0.00052932714,0.001130537,0.00014317113,0.00005763091,0.00001777565,0.07230366,0.0004528158,0.000057856967,0.43533438,0.48826033,0.0003496091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06464351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18305627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96259975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003652343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037634134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9415851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898181445","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0017","title":"How the prison is a black box in punishment theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Sanctions; Prison; Imprisonment; Criminology; Legitimacy; Sociology of punishment; Field (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminal law","score_opus":0.015486763415355818,"score_gpt":0.25232860908564647,"score_spread":0.23684184567029065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898181445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71335566,0.00067359785,0.004320598,0.009924577,0.000431467,0.00013518534,0.0000037465843,0.000016195858,0.27113897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952006,0.0006542994,0.00015880956,0.000112386864,0.00018473355,2.1158863e-8,1.1775852e-7,0.00000162733,0.0036874535],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932176,0.00019012793,0.00005813924,0.00007158449,0.00022065445,0.00013773733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995567,0.00005131576,0.00009145591,0.00009442272,0.00014672926,0.00005938382],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005885873,0.00004223478,0.00008172966,0.000019083322,0.0009573731,0.00006867582,0.0002841244,0.00003815054,0.0016494066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002351768,0.00003542338,0.00009386692,0.00006505663,0.00055463996,0.00034951261,0.000036156493,0.00009410411,0.000007946108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025898652,0.00023886516,0.0019474147,0.000010238474,0.00018873718,0.000037606875,0.73223513,0.00001049173,0.00009698961,0.1304564,0.011948983,0.12257012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000125879,0.00005722531,0.0005096241,0.000015578162,0.00010398697,0.00000186455,0.7910999,0.00003259689,0.00002593553,0.00053502433,0.2074495,0.000042859643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21596026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83706784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6211076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030121856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006366179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898316944","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0036","title":"Group RESPs: The intersection of government support for education savings and securities regulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Government (linguistics); Business; Finance; Public economics; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0060629477692027865,"score_gpt":0.19260096867776857,"score_spread":0.18653802090856578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898316944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759465,0.00010867293,0.0009111837,0.00016828299,0.00036690413,0.0001588036,0.0000044767007,0.0000074482546,0.022327762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982464,0.00001889977,0.0006257451,0.00008993722,0.00043736896,1.2645532e-7,0.000006622034,0.000003833694,0.0005710778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995142,0.000009654238,0.00013489737,0.00007863504,0.00019322868,0.0000693614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992765,0.000017081175,0.0003474199,0.00007664321,0.00027537346,0.0000069388016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031731377,0.000054559405,0.00009339791,0.000019688145,0.000367716,0.000042921707,0.0001024888,0.000026685038,0.00050228916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024682427,0.000049285787,0.00006693181,0.000033989065,0.00012494254,0.0011272171,0.00005683961,0.000030413163,0.0000012225651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016802844,0.00030936612,0.110564634,0.00040285406,0.00012470274,0.0000012922097,0.0074462625,0.000006352954,0.0068210247,0.801371,0.041838802,0.029433444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011898259,0.0002822004,0.42382157,0.00034255726,0.000493565,0.000007997179,0.019156223,0.0020732568,0.0004005529,0.010673853,0.5413284,0.00023000217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013916262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04519704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79069716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015771628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012935017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99265015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898506936","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0018","title":"Same-sex marriage beyond Charter dialogue: Charter cases and contestation within government","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Appeal; Law; Cabinet (room); Political science; Charter; Legislature; Caucus; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017619022394133373,"score_gpt":0.246761469031435,"score_spread":0.22914244663730163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898506936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90283656,0.00046950637,0.00008526431,0.0023053763,0.00061729737,0.00023091516,0.00005604638,0.000026664195,0.093372345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961011,0.0003011702,0.0005600566,0.00013802445,0.00033685213,9.484154e-8,0.0000011805495,0.0000033412205,0.0025581813],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990686,0.0001354965,0.00011137576,0.00011765666,0.00038709506,0.0001797395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937963,0.00010128741,0.00017606097,0.00005461625,0.00015237484,0.00013605462],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003304758,0.00008420377,0.0001525737,0.0000046535847,0.001537455,0.000054573542,0.00013243203,0.000056755413,0.0009709294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007575518,0.00007728971,0.00005262426,0.000015076433,0.00076627557,0.00062934513,0.00005628501,0.0000804668,0.000008822575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037805046,0.00019047044,0.023516065,0.000028714972,0.0004040823,0.00017044345,0.8828858,0.000001123862,0.0021866078,0.05751729,0.01815322,0.014568116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002683728,0.00083090994,0.08338078,0.00011008092,0.00017432582,0.00004666251,0.5731069,0.00004762352,0.00038834978,0.0007449944,0.33795998,0.0005257175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11157767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4660262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35444853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005134162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002246114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900682386","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0084","title":"<i>Dunsmuir</i>’s Disconnect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Law; Rule of law; Action (physics); Administrative law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.013911962211216943,"score_gpt":0.24684771979243017,"score_spread":0.23293575758121324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900682386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098698445,0.00013619264,0.00019834081,0.000410751,0.0004383721,0.000039963565,0.0000023992548,0.00002131071,0.9000542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884448,0.00015639125,0.0005261371,0.000056393532,0.00062034995,4.181958e-9,3.0949948e-7,0.0000028707987,0.010192727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993595,0.0000970382,0.00006671693,0.00007809382,0.00022093023,0.00017772432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951684,0.000023071072,0.00008889534,0.00008208245,0.00014097837,0.00014813988],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028221085,0.000047833862,0.000095752715,0.00001123798,0.0017937302,0.000036397993,0.0003168073,0.000045020854,0.010719128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008020331,0.000047178564,0.00008244488,0.000016032598,0.0008598529,0.0005585521,0.000030310688,0.00006730264,0.00006427472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041610085,0.000048044847,0.00025589232,0.000002094888,0.00003367897,0.000022692257,0.051297806,2.149574e-7,0.000056241748,0.93675464,0.009486038,0.002001026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040583228,0.00012629824,0.0014991517,0.00002123013,0.000024825742,0.000005158453,0.024451062,0.000003683081,0.000054457654,0.0057605677,0.9675475,0.00010027763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07680144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74869347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018984394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075459466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900859774","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0085","title":"A house divided: The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent jurisprudence on the standard of review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of review; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Voting; Political science; Statute; Roberts Court; Jurisdiction; Concurring opinion; Deference; Legislature; Economic Justice; Law of the case; Unanimity; Statutory law; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Court of record","score_opus":0.022875086450049906,"score_gpt":0.2539409517552513,"score_spread":0.23106586530520137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900859774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15149847,0.012235799,0.00009433758,0.0700837,0.0011887543,0.0008714945,0.00010562712,0.000028637693,0.7638932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829687,0.015226904,0.00006194173,0.00033539662,0.000120131575,2.5456925e-8,1.2394109e-7,0.000003818113,0.0012829861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872035,0.00025689948,0.00014417755,0.0000666891,0.0006647636,0.00014710148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988832,0.00011545097,0.0002954819,0.0001800954,0.0004464189,0.00007934677],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010656263,0.00005577584,0.00017675907,0.0000063332905,0.0010621878,0.000010175552,0.0006340861,0.000025364421,0.003694695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057639536,0.000034013203,0.00007435145,0.000028600227,0.0008550547,0.00013287806,0.000042988868,0.00010166582,0.0000015777389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023846774,0.00007822188,0.0002356405,0.00007283635,0.00013006068,0.000013484186,0.030166497,0.0000017480472,0.000027543176,0.58022356,0.3865562,0.0022556935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017943792,0.00020299315,0.0011726144,0.0005463213,0.000056963716,0.0000015320217,0.0063708755,8.837421e-7,0.00014148036,0.0010113275,0.9902589,0.000056693178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.703495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8314702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000408718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008108999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901057308","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0108","title":"The concept of a linguistic community","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Constitution; Nothing; Sociology; Statutory interpretation; Law; Constitutional law; Perspective (graphical); Common law; Political science; Scholarship; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.018152313446316203,"score_gpt":0.26815142520049395,"score_spread":0.24999911175417774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901057308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091533855,0.0006366208,0.00030517494,0.00041906597,0.0004973556,0.000053726733,0.000014319271,0.0000072362045,0.90653265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785894,0.00007107203,0.00009406458,0.000020393065,0.00023704342,4.6835695e-9,6.292883e-8,0.0000010874933,0.0017173472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992526,0.00030572485,0.000083699706,0.000025922556,0.00019589711,0.00013616319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991818,0.00020271452,0.00015743835,0.000094240866,0.0002756127,0.00008819754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063163915,0.000028130244,0.0000836263,0.0000019672932,0.0020631866,0.000013460026,0.000378806,0.000031469597,0.00028332305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023243237,0.00002304961,0.000055138727,0.000014523627,0.0015526413,0.00009454521,0.000041218613,0.00010168696,0.0000027351748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001829201,0.000021656053,0.00022899288,0.0000017047547,0.000016873772,0.0000015462207,0.033726662,1.2320494e-7,0.000014578987,0.9638154,0.0012911911,0.0008629635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019992933,0.0001057845,0.0036700584,0.00003838508,0.00001205439,0.0000017913649,0.01819764,0.0000041731687,0.00004693022,0.0044208593,0.97326535,0.000037047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7699259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7248559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97197413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015546648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084231746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901358135","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0053","title":"The Legitimacy of Civil Freedom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Foundation (evidence); Normative; Law; Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.015553866862264058,"score_gpt":0.21065756097522592,"score_spread":0.19510369411296186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901358135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101460665,0.00045985798,0.0008300408,0.0007055794,0.0009955921,0.00008675477,0.000018485649,0.00001908504,0.89542395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755853,0.0002908429,0.00021453346,0.000037485213,0.0001489473,7.1982207e-9,6.148002e-8,0.0000028858192,0.0017466779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994101,0.00006509919,0.00009690337,0.00008291,0.0002065606,0.00013845145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944997,0.000079503174,0.00015478762,0.00014789694,0.00010278837,0.00006508511],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013743542,0.00005139835,0.000086291846,0.000007799023,0.0007274701,0.00001564617,0.000498382,0.000023881033,0.001379918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051907093,0.000039256087,0.00008572444,0.000026099135,0.0008047477,0.00034034936,0.00008287563,0.00007643707,0.000013515941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007066141,0.00041140197,0.0011798218,0.000030445086,0.000082437524,0.0001957385,0.007921054,0.000041729807,0.3401165,0.54572004,0.07496309,0.028631134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016301225,0.00078814564,0.0039277365,0.00008504924,0.000049463288,0.00017886079,0.0027210552,0.0005038157,0.047039587,0.004067705,0.9387822,0.00022623182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071942406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06504842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8960979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000480552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032301516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901505419","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0060","title":"How institutions structure judicial behaviour: An analysis of Alarie and Green’s <i>Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts: A Cross-Country Examination of Institutional Constraints on Judges</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Structuring; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01783893595478457,"score_gpt":0.26579021817837395,"score_spread":0.24795128222358936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901505419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98579705,0.000083835235,0.0003421667,0.00031498878,0.00015303327,0.00010278108,0.00037980257,0.0000059553504,0.0128203705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994655,0.00013937142,0.00016773352,0.00005693366,0.00012277055,1.01518296e-7,0.000026889058,0.0000013768752,0.000019270983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991174,0.00010307063,0.00014492516,0.00013621067,0.00039308995,0.00010533422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900043,0.000040356244,0.00021849919,0.0000621995,0.0005891215,0.000089376954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002458385,0.00008560786,0.00021804677,0.00007759365,0.0017281894,0.000042541506,0.00010675112,0.000093877694,0.00020521967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045571476,0.00008651253,0.000047040558,0.00009438128,0.0046531856,0.00059676776,0.00003264841,0.00008933865,1.382569e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014369574,0.0001785226,0.017304588,0.0000042485685,0.0003315408,0.0000060562343,0.004203699,0.00012542175,0.0002523384,0.97210974,0.000024332574,0.0053158104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001552331,0.000927293,0.9783162,0.00008248929,0.000998729,0.0000084656895,0.012071066,0.00009130335,0.00024476077,0.0019353912,0.003555861,0.00021611637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068856984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37754893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002510335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022912213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901670390","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0086","title":"<i>Dunsmuir</i> and the scope of admissible evidence on judicial review: Principled limitations or path dependency?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Charter; Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Relevance (law); Duty; Law and economics; Law; Judicial opinion; Subject (documents); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0840774017677635,"score_gpt":0.3263102886251629,"score_spread":0.2422328868573994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901670390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05899976,0.108643115,0.0008779272,0.03272115,0.001070775,0.001341916,0.000020433466,0.00005060683,0.7962743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8480835,0.14939123,0.0008652587,0.0003642224,0.0001930661,1.3050382e-7,1.7824331e-7,0.0000032533137,0.0010991736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987802,0.00032960842,0.00017644415,0.000112856826,0.00044408237,0.0001567894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984967,0.00054751727,0.0002737377,0.00013719045,0.00040406157,0.00014077024],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014577315,0.000068197725,0.00020779352,0.000011434907,0.0012750063,0.000025149355,0.00041613774,0.00004255908,0.0010044327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009376041,0.000048921615,0.00008719444,0.000060768147,0.0012411878,0.0006342194,0.00006867634,0.000106755106,0.0000069558237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006637482,0.00033637098,0.00084449875,0.00057346595,0.00020137968,0.00009880671,0.07208092,0.000005694082,0.000504912,0.8162713,0.046185244,0.05625995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029776602,0.0022273029,0.004978274,0.014671381,0.0008424267,0.00006871598,0.03439918,0.000031703414,0.00046416596,0.003834229,0.9350525,0.0004524714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050286047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3406353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88886726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011152862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033183538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903694083","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0068","title":"The power to consent: Indigenous peoples, states, and development projects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Veto; Indigenous; Duty; Declaration; Supreme court; Commit; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Medicine; Linguistics; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014181696564772207,"score_gpt":0.2559748801376912,"score_spread":0.241793183572919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903694083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7834919,0.000717578,0.00010138268,0.00039016476,0.0005573478,0.00032634076,0.0000032865094,0.000013394315,0.21439856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965915,0.018137688,0.0031544133,0.00008404628,0.00033358476,5.25926e-8,0.0000018047574,0.0000074143104,0.012365992],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914104,0.0001388302,0.00010221114,0.000087959925,0.0002333045,0.000296639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920344,0.00009458591,0.00010619833,0.00007064536,0.0003042856,0.00022085886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006689181,0.000055454402,0.000079567624,0.000016434675,0.019573929,0.00005503425,0.00021460638,0.00004571271,0.00023898686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000446829,0.000042849726,0.00001753865,0.000029432702,0.0004564633,0.0001794349,0.0000045179913,0.000062692125,0.000015386984],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003735999,0.000035468416,0.0004041214,0.0000046697405,0.00002094644,0.000003602686,0.9627381,1.3329777e-7,6.9397646e-7,0.035351615,0.0005375766,0.00086571666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011893792,0.0000934208,0.0025698594,0.00001659927,0.000004601349,0.00000757908,0.16541539,9.7805035e-8,0.00001762525,0.00005773896,0.83164227,0.000055902223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7028913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99911296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83110464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052154204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008498491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904922122","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0057","title":"Institutional bypasses in Brazil’s New Unionism movement: Central unions and workers’ committees","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Representation (politics); State (computer science); Dysfunctional family; Political economy; Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Labour economics; Economics; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.011051428953507667,"score_gpt":0.25062470830465267,"score_spread":0.239573279351145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904922122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5786297,0.000920046,0.0015867798,0.009511504,0.0010636341,0.00022143435,0.0000407692,0.000036193967,0.40798995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950336,0.00074281497,0.0011996742,0.00040713043,0.00024539395,2.11006e-8,0.0000024724695,0.000002886211,0.0023660003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991936,0.00010618079,0.000109413,0.000097837146,0.00024518353,0.00024777662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947417,0.0000300112,0.00008713012,0.0000700878,0.000101150865,0.00023745876],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023073981,0.00006751895,0.000105518106,0.000030672192,0.0015691074,0.000056872712,0.0002318763,0.000060911294,0.0018455506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016661801,0.00007257432,0.000039627757,0.000067872694,0.00072446134,0.00074206095,0.00007110734,0.000107152395,0.0000010780776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027454187,0.00008857833,0.030637333,0.0000010610704,0.00003755331,0.0000124193575,0.01082056,0.000009899202,0.000041463187,0.9492528,0.0056654774,0.003405417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009479289,0.00006174898,0.34255773,0.000053322867,0.00001664766,0.0000017675915,0.01729484,0.000008652101,0.00001194408,0.0037945977,0.6351538,0.00009706695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47355026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8744268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036776988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032919672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906133617","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0024","title":"Constructing the global constitutional canon: Between authority and criticism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Criticism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.024486889273632746,"score_gpt":0.2788400033718727,"score_spread":0.25435311409823996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906133617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058587268,0.0010102366,0.0013996526,0.004178357,0.00049148913,0.000059819205,0.00006510328,0.000014390516,0.9341937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986219,0.00008982517,0.00049579935,0.000059912923,0.0006720075,1.4795959e-8,3.7989716e-7,4.727381e-7,0.000059684793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993551,0.00009940434,0.000079140445,0.00007352115,0.00024376485,0.00014911905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945146,0.000085102976,0.000052456315,0.000033319528,0.00027631284,0.0001013231],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003713063,0.000047869176,0.00010280466,0.0000038577664,0.004219461,0.000032350497,0.00016035016,0.000043723332,0.00042535318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063449355,0.00004219163,0.00004327435,0.00002969526,0.0103172865,0.00025932697,0.000070460315,0.0000777955,0.0000032377534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009319311,0.00000488792,0.03819759,7.542535e-7,0.00003907706,0.0000051795714,0.00126829,4.1676746e-8,0.0000010301525,0.9570569,0.00029985863,0.003117103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067185645,0.00009827874,0.054823473,0.000067250534,0.00016004528,0.000095431125,0.084399834,0.00000293569,0.000012664264,0.19821376,0.6612492,0.00020528116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.171951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50613517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035518594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028819303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910883856","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0079","title":"Voicing the market: Extending the ambition of contract theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Value (mathematics); Centrality; Morality; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Economics; Government (linguistics); Contract theory; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.008238026037929214,"score_gpt":0.23779649265686761,"score_spread":0.2295584666189384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910883856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17946772,0.00048249832,0.0013120392,0.0027661854,0.00016732975,0.000194421,0.000007428976,0.000008340543,0.815594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743176,0.00026123604,0.000079393634,0.00005215914,0.000068477326,2.7927152e-8,1.6737638e-7,0.0000016295993,0.002105164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941957,0.00019770503,0.00007148955,0.00004404108,0.00017498703,0.00009219413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940884,0.00021976477,0.00016472394,0.00009776079,0.00007816597,0.00003072181],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011454955,0.000029973678,0.000063914784,0.000004398447,0.0009589041,0.0000217229,0.00031217714,0.000025309471,0.0025770597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017672672,0.000019830948,0.000077302655,0.000021417802,0.0002431527,0.00026681297,0.000032726428,0.00009579105,0.0000048204192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035617224,0.00001951962,0.00062075275,0.0000025467334,0.000027056652,7.1312644e-7,0.010023752,0.000020861984,0.0006770519,0.9841277,0.000455491,0.003988926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062323763,0.00006042111,0.050889734,0.00008322353,0.000094576215,0.000008617755,0.13836336,0.00021734246,0.0001741579,0.010856323,0.7985106,0.00011839461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05798263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05948181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97327137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110520385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004330933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911880519","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0118","title":"Nothing to hide, but something to lose","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014755831856533263,"score_gpt":0.17889282991633443,"score_spread":0.16413699805980117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911880519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36393657,0.0016131371,0.006174259,0.0030446819,0.00080907973,0.00013542252,0.000059365255,0.000016199829,0.62421125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910299,0.00007328795,0.0041438807,0.0006800726,0.00008274383,4.3191896e-8,4.2991883e-7,0.0000037677396,0.0039858487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949235,0.0000061370047,0.00015878255,0.00014017818,0.00004959819,0.0001529567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995875,0.0000219448,0.00011580458,0.00009297801,0.000057352107,0.00012446234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021746386,0.00006659028,0.0002095864,0.000042540254,0.00028583623,0.000032477023,0.00022804282,0.000034504854,0.0014847508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023476732,0.000080404134,0.00009596584,0.00003560632,0.000031395906,0.00048182084,0.00012970796,0.0000972844,0.0006912657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006461497,0.00004094224,0.0084536625,0.000011098852,0.0001012062,0.000017261955,0.0046749082,0.0004458103,0.00017039737,0.9833593,0.0014268252,0.0012339985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005464356,0.00012840163,0.010853584,0.00004896032,0.000008172106,0.000014347091,0.0025126499,0.00004574284,0.00005859026,0.00437784,0.9811947,0.00021059578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036810007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006928404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97976786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032410328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016887461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920997510","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0041","title":"Slow or spectacular death: Reconsidering the legal history of blockade and submarines in World War I","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Interdiction; Law; Historiography; Law of war; International law; Spanish Civil War; History; Political science; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029464353710831007,"score_gpt":0.22297734741772735,"score_spread":0.19351299370689634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920997510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70218366,0.0004092229,0.0000032046942,0.00025839198,0.00026694336,0.000051059014,0.0000010376954,0.00000330222,0.2968232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435015,0.00011310229,0.00021016035,0.000018719411,0.00007648949,1.33306495e-8,1.5367212e-7,0.000002041816,0.056077834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994952,0.000069404814,0.00009247821,0.000064867054,0.00018160764,0.00009644433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966013,0.00006453165,0.000106539395,0.00005339797,0.00007578969,0.000039578215],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027625702,0.00004251959,0.00010793339,0.000027139737,0.00018524929,0.000008831099,0.00018641529,0.000025793528,0.0026651006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008860881,0.000033224456,0.00004936273,0.000009060117,0.00019737454,0.00034660602,0.000033671633,0.00009219402,0.000002022213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011412353,0.000030512974,0.0058736755,0.000008170918,0.00003864921,0.000052545733,0.013266,0.000010858002,0.00010075814,0.9798337,0.00049072545,0.0001802583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001001902,0.00008707159,0.020893598,0.000120419056,0.00003679268,0.000032061427,0.006415231,0.000061233484,0.000073038136,0.009213593,0.9619136,0.00015149618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14011537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8037493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97062016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056405703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014243645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921422683","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0078","title":"Reconstituting Canada: The enfranchisement and disenfranchisement of ‘Indians,’ circa 1837–1900","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Treaty; Political science; Law; Democracy; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.003430689752311973,"score_gpt":0.16154386553397526,"score_spread":0.15811317578166328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921422683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28631437,0.0040652496,0.00005016874,0.001802763,0.0012849463,0.00025289282,0.00004922766,0.0000064899764,0.7061739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956321,0.00093830127,0.00007258882,0.0000823045,0.00006781379,2.8774929e-8,5.0051466e-7,0.0000021948808,0.003204175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928516,0.00008453927,0.00011494043,0.0000785252,0.00028403607,0.00015277781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994854,0.000042765532,0.00017129992,0.00009206719,0.00007181836,0.0001366989],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003704663,0.00004507132,0.00012521233,0.000026902217,0.001353555,0.00003852785,0.00022584025,0.000030589006,0.0031501527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013219657,0.00005128621,0.00005698312,0.000026302057,0.00051745767,0.00023401646,0.00003036824,0.00009467939,0.00000203149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002035847,0.0001822142,0.034041777,0.00020984893,0.0006000983,0.00012939757,0.19751735,0.00018180309,0.00043377097,0.6241274,0.070460215,0.071912535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033215297,0.000023398507,0.0075023877,0.000041177987,0.000035663335,0.0000033880456,0.02692081,0.000004624572,0.000003657712,0.00006737228,0.9649979,0.00006747143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8945377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015225131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013499806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922446363","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0063","title":"The problem of the past: How historic wrongs became legal problems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Injustice; Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Complicity; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.0079962469658757,"score_gpt":0.16531471255409533,"score_spread":0.15731846558821963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922446363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6079498,0.007854054,0.0014155892,0.013933347,0.0009913411,0.0014062913,0.000058138758,0.000033666918,0.36635774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935787,0.00036336458,0.0006218712,0.000011918562,0.000048013568,2.0818764e-8,9.997523e-7,9.754276e-7,0.0053741722],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912196,0.0001584146,0.00007982508,0.00008220824,0.00035871737,0.00019884287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994409,0.00009540802,0.00016376015,0.00011388664,0.00009745983,0.000088569344],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044692244,0.000056121986,0.00009510377,0.000008414472,0.00061802566,0.000020275793,0.00048629436,0.000042832904,0.0018105516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012290845,0.000030599367,0.000100865465,0.00003999073,0.0003133238,0.00036290428,0.00004634599,0.0002275333,0.00001256208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017863115,0.000085951484,0.43463528,0.00021929422,0.00031406325,0.000037490976,0.0058595063,0.0037884407,0.0014191644,0.028847352,0.012117477,0.51088965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004757573,0.0008491106,0.14772932,0.000040318748,0.000014729904,0.000045230983,0.0014041935,0.00036603725,0.000050083858,0.0031200964,0.84581137,0.00009374214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066324435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1953789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8336939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004389479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059104656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936064673","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.003","title":"Assisted dying, suspended declarations, and dialogue’s time","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Political science; Charter; Law; Legislation; Legislature; Praise; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Politics; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.011862443589240169,"score_gpt":0.23123663071061687,"score_spread":0.2193741871213767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936064673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22597659,0.00050728675,0.00009630672,0.0007092118,0.000222182,0.00010283275,0.000011101856,0.0000147554265,0.7723597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861074,0.00012532066,0.00027626552,0.000036474063,0.00007445015,1.0458447e-8,6.916766e-7,0.0000019023839,0.013377457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993959,0.00010805769,0.00007501023,0.00007034465,0.00020145497,0.00014924629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995784,0.000050315357,0.00010531866,0.00005699044,0.00006981906,0.00013914907],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028552004,0.000039644652,0.00011464437,0.0000056768226,0.00046550506,0.00003347428,0.00013268183,0.00005632042,0.002501952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002371331,0.00004186781,0.00004128264,0.000013849221,0.0001427932,0.00042505332,0.00002666854,0.00006112521,0.000041187617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003037128,0.000041258663,0.0061201556,0.000007367838,0.000041833548,0.000015410655,0.0049777757,0.0000012725799,0.00050569605,0.98340064,0.0033300028,0.0015282063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072171545,0.00007048694,0.047338996,0.000048641978,0.000024766985,0.000014182959,0.0031567407,0.000038104095,0.000015124672,0.0014048234,0.9470404,0.00012601228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2660866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24612652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022671834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075041666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950720224","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0022","title":"Marriage, work, and the invention of family law in English legal thought","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Wife; Domestic relations; Law; Cognitive reframing; Ideology; Situated; Sociology; Relation (database); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012096950998904352,"score_gpt":0.23526338550525075,"score_spread":0.2231664345063464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950720224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32992738,0.00028518907,0.000035122226,0.0006957941,0.00011074133,0.00011740533,0.0000030724436,0.0000047757712,0.6688205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731326,0.000261662,0.000201654,0.000038517665,0.000055121647,4.202987e-8,3.5181316e-7,0.000001480436,0.0021279275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949205,0.00012507015,0.000088863475,0.00005697128,0.0001519917,0.000085046704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963725,0.00005533323,0.00011312299,0.000070235066,0.00008283789,0.00004123485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005775068,0.00003231791,0.000097568496,0.0000074150084,0.0002631926,0.00002581564,0.00019170738,0.00003878534,0.00021361906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011116096,0.000027743909,0.00005556903,0.000037893573,0.00035910014,0.0004216133,0.000049124665,0.00009692243,0.0000013430366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005823495,0.000019710282,0.0016241826,0.0000028901306,0.000009079073,8.458077e-7,0.005801012,0.000009567059,0.000022640368,0.9919213,0.00019638294,0.00033412286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018329943,0.000025780539,0.014488722,0.000043969703,0.000024142166,6.610638e-7,0.034167286,0.000017519205,0.000011941657,0.0031333717,0.9461828,0.000070820184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15390627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2887558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98878795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085094325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003634858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85172796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952608107","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-05-22","title":"Damages without duty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Duty; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01019217149654458,"score_gpt":0.25134800550708025,"score_spread":0.24115583401053567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952608107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16170666,0.000099616955,0.0002135017,0.0009658263,0.00010333796,0.000065029715,0.0000040745313,0.000013696127,0.83682823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98774105,0.0001918495,0.00096938864,0.00003347191,0.00007550001,9.670829e-9,3.9693825e-7,0.000001862658,0.01098645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957687,0.000045567278,0.00004869099,0.00005832608,0.00016427392,0.000106259264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964774,0.000018037093,0.00007697339,0.00008312105,0.00008278237,0.00009134256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020789579,0.000031083175,0.00007056722,0.000005157667,0.0005870856,0.000024463163,0.00025436896,0.000034007535,0.0038142477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005145488,0.000033053835,0.000055013716,0.000016021742,0.00012973837,0.00040683176,0.000036663223,0.00007107025,0.000054851218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021703085,0.000051601502,0.013451371,0.0000041969565,0.000028638848,0.0000038273884,0.010687042,0.000018971705,0.00039638253,0.9710465,0.0021375648,0.002152172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002444602,0.00002104315,0.0072105112,0.00000937727,0.000011391634,0.0000017200385,0.014994646,0.000014297421,0.00001794116,0.0005264338,0.9768942,0.000053979973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12044124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20460525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97475666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014582775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066755114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954005072","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0023","title":"The patriation of Canadian corporate law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Common law; Political science; English law; Corporate law; Legislation; Comparative law; Sources of law; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Business","score_opus":0.01927071117823441,"score_gpt":0.21882490558066606,"score_spread":0.19955419440243166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954005072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08725339,0.00013623852,0.00003839735,0.002573387,0.00015889059,0.00010634175,0.000015651844,0.0000040618943,0.9097136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756056,0.00029821432,0.0001462637,0.00002480219,0.000039464252,1.0934105e-8,6.529072e-7,0.0000011279603,0.0019288813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963033,0.0000510823,0.00006145081,0.000035123856,0.0001283195,0.00009370898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948794,0.00003203188,0.00017896232,0.000069689886,0.00013580597,0.00009557733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032259652,0.00002180561,0.000048768496,0.000009435059,0.0009528663,0.00002010255,0.00021577186,0.000028895576,0.00047324694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005304327,0.000019381518,0.000042855667,0.00003866267,0.00014923484,0.00021820937,0.000013040205,0.000048068076,0.000011010729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062465933,0.0000046568193,0.00073272793,7.9451394e-7,0.000008995403,4.862974e-7,0.0024648353,0.000014039364,0.000053645475,0.99571884,0.00048338933,0.00051131716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014730149,0.000017240362,0.002730458,0.000005084572,0.000008934709,4.40924e-7,0.010059644,0.00001701791,0.000019223002,0.0021382994,0.9848271,0.00002924364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97488403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99708176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020293714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019159935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7328773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954077660","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0115","title":"Corrective justice, coherence, and Kantian right","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Economic Justice; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Indeterminate; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008365572406852782,"score_gpt":0.19333079816482543,"score_spread":0.18496522575797264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954077660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49526265,0.00022688479,0.00015569465,0.00008851841,0.00076063746,0.000088636116,0.000012169888,0.000015689577,0.5033891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949578,0.00020992054,0.00023292235,0.00007381906,0.000038917482,8.360953e-9,1.8372182e-7,0.0000031653958,0.0044832835],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999445,0.000056167162,0.00006803996,0.00014176026,0.00015269512,0.00013629455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996043,0.000055484787,0.00010331483,0.00008865816,0.000045996687,0.000102240076],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000066779685,0.00006759072,0.00011763127,0.000014506138,0.00031538124,0.000020062413,0.00020515009,0.00003773553,0.0032103015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001654597,0.00006367615,0.000045680914,0.00002519481,0.00015611156,0.0005083422,0.00006016917,0.00011606132,0.000043095264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012451864,0.00085684983,0.023430288,0.00029439115,0.00016200959,0.0016667609,0.016197119,0.00015685156,0.4524854,0.43730536,0.029597282,0.036602475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010147851,0.0026607553,0.08990034,0.0006165594,0.0006267379,0.0023503536,0.022030376,0.002777494,0.06974839,0.006484917,0.79098445,0.0016717599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003337436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054798997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76138717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057428308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024085699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99770087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957568653","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0022","title":"Unity in the eye of the beholder? Reasons for decision in theory and practice in the Ontario Works program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Corporate governance; Front line; Public relations; Scale (ratio); Judicial opinion; Political science; Sociology; Law; Management; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.019062088792294,"score_gpt":0.2965428445027758,"score_spread":0.2774807557104818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957568653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85845727,0.00081040006,0.000038776092,0.0030804502,0.000099365316,0.0004849367,0.0000024217984,0.000001600222,0.13702479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992801,0.00030621586,0.00023810967,0.000094205556,0.000017718503,3.0542034e-7,1.260099e-7,6.320963e-7,0.000062601124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989377,0.00059322116,0.00008314274,0.000055255176,0.00022913421,0.00010153738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823165,0.0015164546,0.000102384016,0.000064365406,0.00007088372,0.000014284166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030010417,0.000036861315,0.000084999854,0.000010226688,0.00049457006,0.000022230248,0.00032510163,0.00004069405,0.000036043562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037733436,0.000021410724,0.000044399218,0.0000670641,0.00042270895,0.0003228552,0.00004828111,0.00017867333,1.8126413e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006231258,0.00032442858,0.09098553,0.0000027335045,0.000022436025,0.000007168856,0.1664105,0.000028735689,0.0000025619656,0.71979964,0.00013043702,0.021662727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006259091,0.00009238955,0.52988285,0.0001754975,0.00003037713,0.0000047488265,0.33888054,0.0000022248314,3.7584948e-7,0.025121976,0.10513325,0.000049849565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6078769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69467765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019708206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015154414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39473426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961168636","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0057","title":"A new legal science with an old aftertaste","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Scholarship; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Criminal justice; Argumentative; Normative; Criticism; Criminal law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.010563075363505973,"score_gpt":0.248315783896043,"score_spread":0.23775270853253702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961168636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.651145,0.00013350825,0.00042023236,0.0010113132,0.00030708543,0.000088649285,0.0000011214961,0.000018462322,0.34687462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98869175,0.000048034453,0.0037814248,0.000050506984,0.000097405595,5.229717e-9,1.1359902e-7,0.0000024248377,0.007328326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989992,0.000046912613,0.000058862795,0.00013671412,0.00052372226,0.00023459188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992623,0.000018479135,0.00008658184,0.00012889718,0.00016587954,0.00033788552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046810502,0.000055068173,0.0001004535,0.0000175394,0.00086185674,0.000105674066,0.000561721,0.000028731183,0.0025003892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008162193,0.000052255462,0.00004000068,0.000056684432,0.00047726417,0.0030637276,0.000042995347,0.00008719067,0.000020937252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001031133,0.00011831347,0.011254504,0.000017863918,0.00003856528,0.00017166305,0.055396177,0.000066197405,0.0020846247,0.912519,0.0021266635,0.015175345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011751017,0.0012297845,0.011453256,0.00019737754,0.00007379921,0.000086288244,0.09430077,0.00004533379,0.00020501686,0.00064312434,0.8902611,0.00032905213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.490849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.611426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91187584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002910998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005160231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964660712","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-05-27","title":"Institutions protecting constitutional democracy: Some conceptual and methodological preliminaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Legislature; Statutory law; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Government (linguistics); Executive branch; Constitutional law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07140572652467007,"score_gpt":0.3218985388752062,"score_spread":0.2504928123505361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964660712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2602231,0.004086222,0.011657787,0.0030644087,0.0012489253,0.00064567785,0.00003153743,0.00010466695,0.7189377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823366,0.00012603874,0.0165575,0.00004569969,0.0001373013,7.051687e-8,6.300638e-7,0.0000016570525,0.00079452636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988052,0.00046362545,0.00011552326,0.00013054015,0.0002869019,0.00019819319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991506,0.0003247687,0.00014612003,0.00007090148,0.00015756201,0.00015010108],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009415489,0.00006977989,0.00017341363,0.000015076331,0.0021798597,0.000044432407,0.00023328343,0.00011043921,0.0013970606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039242563,0.000071328555,0.00006403882,0.000029895824,0.0044872784,0.0011070371,0.000106832624,0.00026147012,0.000014755105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054902433,0.000022471713,0.0017103478,0.0000042777174,0.000027732216,0.00001487239,0.042494263,0.00003650202,0.00008231495,0.9550663,0.00009247634,0.000393527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009976812,0.00022103035,0.0014588871,0.00006733787,0.00006536055,0.000044637905,0.121868774,0.000027790757,0.00005071555,0.011096342,0.86388403,0.00021740481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013394641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006162925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94396996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027577122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031744372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971621849","doi":"","title":"Sexual History Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: A Critical Reevaluation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Sexual history; Criminology; Sexual revolution; Psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Political science; Medicine; Human sexuality; Medical emergency; Law","score_opus":0.13270185352480676,"score_gpt":0.34066949974569305,"score_spread":0.2079676462208863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971621849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86010784,0.016858954,0.0005935945,0.0018027535,0.001814437,0.00020854676,0.00000674076,0.000040249073,0.11856688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784124,0.00020470699,0.00035471917,0.00007922836,0.000355396,7.1136164e-8,5.9487286e-7,0.00000344346,0.0011606266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824876,0.0005415218,0.00013843506,0.00011528496,0.0006312454,0.00032477683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990342,0.00025649817,0.00009714039,0.00010013278,0.0002549152,0.0002570953],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00196915,0.000073040705,0.00013689473,0.000029026518,0.0004683082,0.000018438343,0.00027161586,0.00012563306,0.0028157039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000501595,0.00008900835,0.000046132285,0.000029627108,0.00038246543,0.0016765126,0.00004647586,0.00021333642,0.000014041394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037652662,0.0008412885,0.06689743,0.00007457707,0.000080697435,0.0002751623,0.7179485,0.000015944119,0.0008085812,0.17114107,0.022605665,0.018934585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008511886,0.0003806212,0.049312778,0.000094522504,0.00012343694,0.000083424566,0.5440515,0.00009829269,0.0000079542115,0.0003326218,0.40432355,0.00034009136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3533148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5813792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3817179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019023567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036726063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982313139","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0051","title":"‘Repugnant’: Homosexuality and Criminal Family Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Homosexuality; Criminal law; State (computer science); Law; State of exception; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04238659385392869,"score_gpt":0.2583657877288654,"score_spread":0.21597919387493675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982313139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10984093,0.0030553485,0.00036919423,0.0042868727,0.00018022128,0.00006122052,0.00001638829,0.000024520596,0.8821653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800825,0.000873858,0.00033958926,0.0005080736,0.0001908544,1.1470567e-8,3.1272762e-7,0.0000011738333,0.000077891695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939704,0.0000798054,0.00007415433,0.000088004264,0.00023339495,0.00012758825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995869,0.000030489766,0.00006775471,0.000027560429,0.000114326576,0.00017299167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017848036,0.000049396578,0.000121790654,0.0000030559493,0.0017248954,0.000024684112,0.00014478917,0.000035664187,0.0002665089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021447908,0.000052314925,0.000049787905,0.00001952823,0.0010677427,0.0003525336,0.00006643886,0.000078805926,0.0000042765464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054484695,0.00002276978,0.000637081,0.000004432582,0.00003707359,0.00003250342,0.019706791,9.757903e-7,0.00009079237,0.9765489,0.0008043425,0.0020598297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056461303,0.00015442136,0.010635788,0.000026609778,0.00010287824,0.000007902876,0.16647576,0.0000049732425,0.000014417062,0.007784468,0.81406415,0.00016404258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37872773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29239234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089733854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007924888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991662242","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.007","title":"Remedies for violations of Indigenous peoples’ human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Indigenous rights; Reservation of rights; Law; Indigenous; Fundamental rights; Jurisprudence; Right to property; International law; Rights of Nature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013313868627646528,"score_gpt":0.2696257006686968,"score_spread":0.25631183204105024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991662242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7723239,0.00010321793,0.0007396561,0.00022539297,0.000101684294,0.000256194,0.000028468252,0.000010755504,0.2262107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624366,0.00003903516,0.0012828594,0.000004840616,0.00006934193,6.817301e-8,0.0000023066661,0.0000017510469,0.0023561406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958384,0.00002734975,0.000089507324,0.00005560451,0.00013967538,0.00010403795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994685,0.00005708995,0.00015557343,0.000075723,0.00018376148,0.000059370454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018989657,0.000032700613,0.00009624372,0.000011614362,0.0013748603,0.000010576764,0.00021807423,0.000039413404,0.0006582473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000057059083,0.000034201104,0.000084076055,0.000019752999,0.00012682067,0.0002588201,0.00002177862,0.00004295886,0.0000036888373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015092521,0.00006638342,0.0030560195,0.000011908737,0.000037094174,4.0950363e-7,0.043553583,0.000014746678,0.000842822,0.9517817,0.00044605703,0.00017418733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084757555,0.00016928611,0.016436908,0.000049846753,0.00006881567,0.0000016307537,0.04155376,0.00001554238,0.00021888228,0.009475791,0.9310239,0.00013805418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15998268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7113073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013684528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076493685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991746385","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.002","title":"The disappointing remedy? Damages as a remedy for violations of human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Political science; Punitive damages; Tort; Law; Human rights; Common law; Proportionality (law); Disappointment; Discretion; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.018075868416494403,"score_gpt":0.29953905966886396,"score_spread":0.28146319125236957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991746385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56957227,0.00035343703,0.00026150187,0.0020092996,0.00033756206,0.0002778932,0.0000057693514,0.000014480491,0.42716777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950007,0.00006461071,0.00051038945,0.000007296226,0.000088079134,4.0532385e-8,6.1737893e-7,0.0000021814697,0.0043260464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993031,0.00009429297,0.00012446949,0.00007503767,0.00024724548,0.00015588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991133,0.00024605702,0.00022001387,0.000110427536,0.00023915619,0.000070997914],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007453215,0.000045434583,0.00010897439,0.000009138029,0.0027216955,0.00003315045,0.00036641493,0.000039025545,0.0004598042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052440333,0.000038170332,0.000118339674,0.000021813508,0.00030417446,0.0004936595,0.000038318605,0.00006989056,0.0000042867387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008396568,0.00003753545,0.0015474411,0.000015823056,0.000042007345,0.0000025429952,0.017269393,0.0000058727555,0.0017958417,0.9761447,0.0021038642,0.00095105276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059896294,0.00028928355,0.0038733676,0.00019711505,0.00009997742,0.0000041676685,0.05112656,0.000034140263,0.00040959215,0.020277893,0.9229485,0.00014044458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14167021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52049273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95586675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012739308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054335225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991900837","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.006","title":"The right-remedy gap in economic and social rights adjudication: Holism versus separability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dignity; Holism; Social rights; Fundamental rights; Right to health; Political science; Law and economics; Empowerment; Human rights; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014228895770455503,"score_gpt":0.26792245688190774,"score_spread":0.25369356111145225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991900837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49127096,0.0006536371,0.000004093624,0.0015574533,0.0008172808,0.00014582857,0.0000060309703,0.0000121175635,0.5055326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986299,0.00011405679,0.00011325956,0.000009922103,0.0001797542,5.0694183e-8,4.9149656e-7,0.0000022340632,0.0009502927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990749,0.0002625572,0.00012513115,0.00012799192,0.00020705599,0.00020237632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993893,0.00019221423,0.00015730238,0.000114369504,0.00006361382,0.0000832267],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007748274,0.000062334286,0.00013851219,0.000011237119,0.0014356584,0.00005455508,0.00039509402,0.000094211115,0.0012182897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001466568,0.000056134922,0.00006377795,0.000020083744,0.00067661534,0.0005682259,0.000066227956,0.00016808024,0.000037733862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004870894,0.000053145475,0.005009009,0.000006166003,0.000066883935,0.000011530787,0.1681611,0.000011062865,0.000008119003,0.82323843,0.0016677462,0.0012796925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001353717,0.000049536924,0.008011884,0.0000072839835,0.000020697495,9.885978e-7,0.014144256,0.00002542228,0.0000049959835,0.0055734017,0.97070086,0.00010697779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09333616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96903306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086784473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115535426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992685277","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.004","title":"Remedial discretion and dilemmas in Asia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Remedial education; Legislation; Reinterpretation; Political science; Law; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Discretion; Constitutionality; Government (linguistics); Judicial restraint; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.00941150560976816,"score_gpt":0.22191570462976817,"score_spread":0.21250419902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992685277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43078542,0.00049185083,0.00009227209,0.0010374124,0.00026383833,0.00006272524,0.000001798613,0.0000051829475,0.5672595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988309,0.00068829366,0.000105514446,0.000011069631,0.00007068364,7.900204e-9,2.3152653e-7,5.6987557e-7,0.00029269006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963725,0.00004477547,0.000044926455,0.000046944555,0.00014573376,0.000080347185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983835,0.00002004086,0.000040323906,0.000018367586,0.000039366907,0.00004355209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018665253,0.00002552972,0.00006909932,0.0000078832145,0.00034985,0.000008668512,0.00006581944,0.000028068753,0.0006496395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009810699,0.000026635866,0.000023908051,0.00001549332,0.00028386348,0.00028795504,0.000019895795,0.000050295217,0.000004636455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000842426,0.000029760458,0.06049819,0.000002021604,0.00001925484,0.000015441703,0.010873125,0.0000049814776,0.000077161014,0.9232219,0.00016544014,0.0050085112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016581913,0.00015924232,0.35845602,0.00013080046,0.000035072146,0.0000093828385,0.1098056,0.000020185713,0.000012417176,0.020268235,0.50922495,0.00021989079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.226684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7021551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013921408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045355868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77846557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993070474","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.001","title":"Interim remedies and constitutional rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Law; Political science; Charter; Plaintiff; Common law; Limiting; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.014208744565499847,"score_gpt":0.23841466989568655,"score_spread":0.2242059253301867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993070474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07784907,0.0013653754,0.00033711753,0.00072362454,0.0004714195,0.000051769224,0.000004276632,0.000010372287,0.91918695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99842185,0.00054239365,0.00022845597,0.00003224648,0.000100910154,9.139568e-9,3.168514e-7,4.1821244e-7,0.0006734043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995778,0.000037302234,0.000054266475,0.000058406506,0.00018046935,0.00009172334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997037,0.00003302099,0.000054095446,0.000024420113,0.0001193213,0.000065454005],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015003805,0.000036475467,0.000090036345,0.000007937056,0.0011054128,0.000013506095,0.000094011644,0.0000296545,0.0014433303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010484928,0.00003538733,0.000038172406,0.000011507424,0.0033788607,0.0003327173,0.000042290605,0.0000524365,0.000014487309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024015324,0.000011986898,0.002627852,0.0000012258018,0.000033218792,0.0000067968513,0.0023723575,9.309929e-7,0.00003493341,0.9939469,0.0006038952,0.00033590526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004340814,0.00005541313,0.0045879097,0.00005766659,0.000024510102,0.000016399601,0.016803073,0.0000023661541,0.000010994509,0.028148428,0.9497682,0.00009100083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08430865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17187707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96579844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012602903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083760424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993557111","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.005","title":"Choosing between simple and complex remedies in socio-economic rights cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Work (physics); Dialogical self; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029304648008640122,"score_gpt":0.2639876908291506,"score_spread":0.23468304282051045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993557111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86429876,0.00049836753,0.00000931141,0.00072291686,0.00011470914,0.000052356492,0.00000838222,0.0000061663172,0.13428901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992596,0.0003792469,0.000104293205,0.00001543345,0.0001351478,9.527697e-9,8.9252376e-7,9.003894e-7,0.00010451137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956965,0.000054316366,0.00007738332,0.000069486436,0.000104916464,0.00012426965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971867,0.00009148486,0.0000711916,0.000025895895,0.00003507943,0.00005770982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001886335,0.000042801777,0.00014297511,0.0000126631685,0.0009667809,0.000016728629,0.00009662197,0.000032928863,0.0006445128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006521032,0.000045217494,0.00003684447,0.000010227353,0.00047716402,0.0003467261,0.00004531856,0.00005677006,0.000007800562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005701568,0.000028138924,0.50390476,0.000006966237,0.00011170476,0.00004209115,0.018429914,0.00001752813,0.00004163008,0.472779,0.0020063187,0.0025749507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010423098,0.00008883472,0.4009027,0.000067781504,0.000046868776,0.000009644056,0.06780375,0.0000097401335,0.000005991864,0.033534605,0.4962786,0.00020914976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60727614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75780493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49427232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035207535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006255092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74357945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994375318","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.intro","title":"Introduction: A symposium examining remedies for violations of human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0192179483760636,"score_gpt":0.252920296803765,"score_spread":0.23370234842770138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994375318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5648396,0.00010811243,0.0007521567,0.0012875206,0.0010717411,0.00029471013,0.000006484765,0.000022470167,0.43161717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98603445,0.000024759824,0.0024152994,0.0000047264184,0.00041571178,4.5504315e-8,0.0000019149345,0.0000020696853,0.011101009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947333,0.000044723052,0.00011336688,0.00007769152,0.0001842467,0.00010664478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945915,0.000033527318,0.00015589864,0.000065501874,0.00022831283,0.000057587287],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003366299,0.00004064466,0.00011910915,0.00002048464,0.0012606737,0.00001386819,0.00014505695,0.00003798371,0.002906811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000040764057,0.000037997837,0.00005288882,0.000016247444,0.0001595577,0.00036352884,0.00001838924,0.00004228673,0.0000033770355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047187874,0.00006415005,0.0011525919,0.00001835567,0.000090437556,0.0000019148592,0.05804664,0.00001712288,0.0019560647,0.93066305,0.007711615,0.00023085558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006138052,0.00019804861,0.0026004736,0.000045912373,0.00003497922,0.0000019729127,0.016209371,0.0000071634345,0.00024652216,0.004533823,0.9754091,0.00009884917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016333591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1703063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96769744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019124197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005477529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005639023","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0076","title":"Criminal justice and the liberal good of ‘order’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Flourishing; Social order; Criminal justice; Order (exchange); Politics; Precondition; Law and economics; Theory of criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Value pluralism; Liberalism; Political philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.023516492643505815,"score_gpt":0.20669629069767598,"score_spread":0.18317979805417017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005639023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6613013,0.0017109917,0.0019771503,0.008821091,0.00046200032,0.00020147022,0.00003457365,0.000030305266,0.3254611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981799,0.00047066185,0.0005627822,0.00044909635,0.00006821293,7.095765e-9,8.4876504e-8,0.0000025033648,0.0002667487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994911,0.0000883619,0.0000852591,0.00008644465,0.00015779525,0.000091021255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996074,0.00008457232,0.000114963994,0.000058571597,0.00004579013,0.00008868927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008176597,0.000051439063,0.00011631587,0.0000045025245,0.00028255695,0.000011780038,0.00025944895,0.000021316922,0.00037243636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007575798,0.000039114042,0.000056613157,0.00002523146,0.00038239322,0.00027286392,0.000086005704,0.000084048086,0.000002062947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036223216,0.00030863914,0.00043667722,0.0005099997,0.00009043929,0.00044411252,0.07067305,0.00022360573,0.11617198,0.78469414,0.007423227,0.015401814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.079041764,0.0087302495,0.029145146,0.00081332,0.00999091,0.0036670915,0.21246257,0.031454485,0.13564019,0.01420966,0.47184366,0.0030009514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018546707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009527968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77048445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015083733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021467473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4077917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005822310","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0064","title":"Civil order, criminal justice, and ‘no justice no peace’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Civil society; Duty; Sanctions; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.02086001863279383,"score_gpt":0.2575681927886288,"score_spread":0.23670817415583498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005822310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093787946,0.003049531,0.0080644395,0.0017912115,0.0013671874,0.00013564782,0.00001783052,0.00007372327,0.8917125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97638816,0.013279943,0.0046841055,0.0007064678,0.0016116115,6.58235e-8,0.000002564469,0.00001154651,0.0033155463],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904525,0.0001268905,0.00012535533,0.00015765699,0.00032921493,0.00021565557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872446,0.00008806256,0.00014430779,0.0000742282,0.0006262418,0.0003426885],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024192689,0.00009090229,0.00018113617,0.000020491272,0.0017872513,0.00007255187,0.00026037442,0.00006887281,0.0033465829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002184173,0.00010420977,0.000104276434,0.000087467786,0.00029397383,0.0005693156,0.0000704831,0.00018262876,0.00006338925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002261661,0.00073742867,0.0005733053,0.0016896268,0.0008692152,0.0006352055,0.6453399,0.0004662207,0.0013734652,0.08118175,0.16531496,0.09955725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032176054,0.00016979547,0.0000767797,0.00002535386,0.004017325,0.000012741168,0.6544605,0.00057411974,0.000002514992,0.000009834618,0.34020478,0.00012446956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12848042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3595489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8883969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001502415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013711324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005824885","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0063","title":"Civil order, markets, and the intelligibility of the criminal law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Criminal law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil society; Modernity; Social order; Sociology; Political science; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.019536961946682915,"score_gpt":0.24530791825934686,"score_spread":0.22577095631266395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005824885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0826213,0.0010681185,0.0010224197,0.031480767,0.00010784507,0.0002581387,0.0000191069,0.000011997966,0.88341033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987935,0.00046273536,0.00023215472,0.0002384231,0.000051759034,2.4891877e-8,9.7846666e-8,0.0000012271514,0.0002200765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941707,0.0001810161,0.00008388409,0.00006402976,0.00017667102,0.00007734952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995046,0.00009879529,0.00011674621,0.00009009168,0.00011568573,0.000074056064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046008584,0.00003504,0.00008848312,0.0000014448839,0.0009391631,0.000020973594,0.00038112898,0.000027056522,0.0005380833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055191304,0.000023063634,0.00007369087,0.000032180324,0.0012876147,0.00016493951,0.00012060257,0.00010885621,7.8683496e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001044545,0.000020476404,0.00028778188,0.000009384063,0.000018637103,5.1283007e-7,0.022761911,0.0000038647177,0.000021650632,0.9750744,0.00064366974,0.0010532687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078974443,0.00003068598,0.0045603192,0.000022198576,0.000101158024,0.0000031713867,0.057156634,0.00013763212,0.00006130401,0.004608455,0.93245816,0.000070554655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10643164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3266636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97046596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052905816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006583597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8995187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005924819","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0061","title":"The constitution of criminal law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Law; Constitution; Political science; Flourishing; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.022617027915012446,"score_gpt":0.25593738061297144,"score_spread":0.233320352697959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005924819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1406029,0.0015538293,0.0068221353,0.0033614875,0.00046270678,0.000086089996,0.00000865274,0.000021490529,0.8470807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998737,0.00079720723,0.00020719497,0.000063148196,0.0000999623,7.7271105e-9,2.375547e-7,7.4833565e-7,0.000094533694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994926,0.00008533276,0.00008413693,0.000047696798,0.00020294658,0.000087274464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948686,0.000058632904,0.00012125891,0.000045230896,0.00019773752,0.000090257054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020794293,0.00003103634,0.000081089805,0.0000047552144,0.0015725936,0.000021916463,0.00020281396,0.00002670615,0.00051511463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032735123,0.000027787699,0.00010964705,0.0000369077,0.0007150707,0.0002502638,0.000022583525,0.00006919526,0.000003450112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001257531,0.000032795753,0.0000945781,0.000009634152,0.00007136903,0.000012834932,0.044024833,0.00006400698,0.00018884608,0.93758494,0.0008583242,0.016932115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013222206,0.00006727003,0.000057684843,0.000010907158,0.0003055849,0.000003638957,0.71719944,0.000057534842,0.00005739275,0.000106060565,0.28196463,0.00003764752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37027216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6969073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93747884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009443884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090321664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006054766","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0118","title":"Criminal punishment and the right to rule","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Criminal justice; State (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Law; Political science; Theory of criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.017173148332485264,"score_gpt":0.20027301433369363,"score_spread":0.18309986600120837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006054766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.616181,0.00069804996,0.0018626834,0.0440776,0.00043353593,0.0002975701,0.000025771044,0.000039950606,0.33638382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749327,0.00015976699,0.00042746682,0.0015011021,0.00006901278,1.8552946e-8,6.9573254e-8,0.0000021687658,0.00034713463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949807,0.00007151957,0.000063292384,0.00010225249,0.00016141812,0.00010341852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996563,0.000039723538,0.000051330775,0.0000620014,0.000022686841,0.0001679459],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008436788,0.00005121965,0.00009251224,0.0000045512056,0.00042364883,0.000025893525,0.0002718601,0.000015343132,0.00093205884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033458313,0.000036570244,0.00005038587,0.000018754945,0.00018951214,0.00021768246,0.00010952241,0.00008372441,0.000013146655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032250446,0.00027709067,0.00036545892,0.00008668822,0.00007716094,0.001230044,0.07140261,0.00015466148,0.17747892,0.67580885,0.046732087,0.023161389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061301813,0.0007771986,0.0030349258,0.00006538202,0.00018249748,0.00036058406,0.009523101,0.0008570282,0.038569655,0.002484188,0.9376173,0.00039798173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002028993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001441378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8908852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035582598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012613619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006544480","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0075","title":"A democratic theory of punishment: The Trop principle","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Law; Democracy; Citizenship; Political science; State (computer science); Supreme court; Prison; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020872847237066516,"score_gpt":0.2526635567651236,"score_spread":0.23179070952805708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006544480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7043325,0.001439869,0.015521801,0.005676267,0.0002606263,0.00017231517,0.0000086783175,0.000026282505,0.27256167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987641,0.00044903767,0.00023509075,0.00007665762,0.00008087651,1.6834923e-8,1.9858282e-7,0.0000014984365,0.0003925353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993624,0.00019925574,0.000087097455,0.000052372678,0.0002097374,0.0000891426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951345,0.00007768802,0.00013737947,0.00006389509,0.00012111523,0.000086461165],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032805422,0.00003552487,0.00009961135,0.000007330041,0.0008009173,0.000015071226,0.00028616,0.000023819302,0.0015602004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005076819,0.000029504556,0.00012836093,0.000057312118,0.00025498416,0.0002035789,0.00003637454,0.00007835983,0.0000029002729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000404461,0.0002001565,0.0010119813,0.000042946496,0.0004776735,0.000040013074,0.39189783,0.00032664245,0.00051151804,0.52412194,0.0021289394,0.0788359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018750953,0.00011959593,0.00029161453,0.000014225474,0.00042356228,0.0000028057837,0.93072504,0.00013653838,0.000038364436,0.0006306049,0.067380525,0.000049599777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047207717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20526214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53882724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009127952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000775215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006647981","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0066","title":"Criminal law as public ordering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Order (exchange); Law; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Verb; Noun; Philosophy of law; Leverage (statistics); Phrase; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05364129303452982,"score_gpt":0.2770848625728848,"score_spread":0.22344356953835495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006647981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046933822,0.0006088839,0.0006284929,0.019982915,0.00023198419,0.000061747596,0.0000026327098,0.000044280318,0.93150526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762744,0.00031519294,0.0008813273,0.0005262433,0.00024707665,1.1753248e-8,3.56726e-7,0.000003585626,0.0003987914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990977,0.00010185595,0.00009410971,0.0001113028,0.00036201152,0.00023301419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992401,0.00004150648,0.00009914807,0.00006287788,0.00017090714,0.00038547246],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027587413,0.000063623884,0.00012610159,0.000006613866,0.0013848286,0.000086893655,0.00044658585,0.000053278298,0.004676019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067124085,0.00007427748,0.0001011554,0.00003385039,0.00039945086,0.0012100117,0.00007792534,0.00013691983,0.000042889125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007623986,0.000028967634,0.00016527226,0.000015705975,0.000024169405,0.00011154672,0.031747535,0.0000055918667,0.00016927555,0.9621094,0.0025378345,0.0030084513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002158723,0.00012029731,0.000149684,0.00002321693,0.000043677293,0.000015378466,0.068920754,0.000012948872,0.000034702713,0.00057499955,0.9297894,0.000099017634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2594647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3923528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96153444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019793627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013987852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010769090","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0142","title":"Criminalization, legal moralism, and abolition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Government (linguistics); Argumentative; Law; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Realm; Sociology; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02444520781592778,"score_gpt":0.2549425004430945,"score_spread":0.23049729262716673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010769090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17153972,0.0010547753,0.01359759,0.045952804,0.00015392131,0.0002228889,0.000035976,0.00007255249,0.76736975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980816,0.00040313345,0.000831067,0.00022818048,0.00013713802,1.4149868e-8,0.0000010258352,0.0000015433932,0.0003162779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966884,0.000039895713,0.000050561735,0.0000540287,0.00011682259,0.00006986697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966973,0.000008685035,0.000059322545,0.000027248183,0.00009592974,0.0001391064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000858061,0.00002647006,0.000052136522,0.000003319287,0.0006842065,0.000035611494,0.000102965634,0.000025137379,0.0006192975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000110247065,0.00003072741,0.000026091322,0.000018736971,0.00014777399,0.00048960187,0.000023040453,0.00004316927,0.000002844196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001125731,0.00001114839,0.0001989884,0.000003785985,0.000006683132,0.0000036430424,0.0152787985,0.000012542301,0.00006821928,0.98176503,0.0019061132,0.00073377934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018931359,0.000022925708,0.0018008354,0.000005122035,0.000021118312,0.0000025748868,0.019176241,0.00008783844,0.00001441828,0.0006502855,0.97798383,0.000045500085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0879778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05161421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98111475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059784183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043957014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9656913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011337745","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0102","title":"Criminal law in an age of mass incarceration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Mass incarceration; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.029609939556643015,"score_gpt":0.27268729641120965,"score_spread":0.24307735685456663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011337745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89574325,0.000115489755,0.0033524483,0.00037939462,0.00006996445,0.000043146978,0.0000037561974,0.000008870171,0.10028369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988625,0.00013934872,0.0007960251,0.00006317542,0.000088360815,1.1464767e-8,0.000001824477,0.0000016036006,0.000047156576],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994036,0.00013212572,0.00010370814,0.00007012178,0.00020130593,0.00008915373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960524,0.000019389863,0.000095136085,0.000045387642,0.00012658753,0.00010825579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018857516,0.000037143764,0.000115434756,0.000017289416,0.00036015545,0.000021825994,0.00017204901,0.000039105147,0.0008074475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013501609,0.000044652927,0.00007277923,0.00005643638,0.00016991033,0.0006015397,0.00001583957,0.00008227792,0.0000014288046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006454661,0.00036093718,0.0050390745,0.00007497923,0.00010477211,0.0003120675,0.65360934,0.0014241692,0.010574568,0.288219,0.00029328943,0.03934234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030828812,0.00020827103,0.001418966,0.000019604053,0.00021182241,0.0000016475151,0.9863006,0.00060369977,0.00009851058,0.00015362674,0.010597137,0.000077810946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47480693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91720235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44239545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015402136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005310754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88409835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012515956","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0115","title":"In Search of Honourable Crowns and Legitimate Constitutions: <i>Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada</i> and the Colonial Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Indigenous; Duty; Doctrine; Political science; Legislation; Colonialism; Sociology","score_opus":0.0248928437648911,"score_gpt":0.23658758774391284,"score_spread":0.21169474397902174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012515956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76428944,0.0047944314,0.00024881167,0.08923141,0.00036326115,0.0008168117,0.000095662974,0.000017002487,0.14014314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797916,0.0016709225,0.00016214995,0.000096357675,0.00003980336,8.9106805e-8,4.3563324e-7,6.789301e-7,0.000050422303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937934,0.0001245935,0.000099650184,0.000067233996,0.00021809783,0.00011111158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995191,0.00012708323,0.000090825415,0.000022577933,0.00015949269,0.00008089001],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000311138,0.00004528228,0.00014022157,0.00000550637,0.0013805706,0.000025871379,0.00010138465,0.00003434754,0.00008886976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010796496,0.000037702754,0.0000237005,0.000036362082,0.002089551,0.0004397947,0.00005073063,0.00009548155,2.0901e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047756574,0.00003562393,0.010143534,0.0000583487,0.000105569125,0.0000388599,0.114265025,0.00031945715,0.00010045179,0.86982965,0.004297252,0.0003286695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013417891,0.00022769999,0.037699204,0.00031797957,0.00023509531,0.000043309785,0.27753773,0.0010894556,0.00018660979,0.0009255873,0.66784644,0.00047302514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99014544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99726224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86890405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037526662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003180858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014232915","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0043","title":"Treaty Failure or Treaty Constitutionalism? The Problematic Validity of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Jurisprudence; Federalism; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Presumption; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Reinterpretation; Political science; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.02510141922362404,"score_gpt":0.22622060910536207,"score_spread":0.20111918988173802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014232915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9026873,0.00029225062,0.00045202518,0.039981667,0.00018958277,0.0006193647,0.000053776446,0.000020651974,0.055703364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755746,0.0000641783,0.0001322931,0.00009815895,0.00007655631,7.6127456e-8,7.7701435e-7,0.0000014212276,0.0020690921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991476,0.00025714823,0.00012179499,0.00007506127,0.00030337466,0.00009500352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941504,0.00007481275,0.00020567117,0.00007808642,0.00014725105,0.00007914752],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000240331,0.00006318857,0.0001300971,0.000004374074,0.0015212159,0.00003572589,0.00027012968,0.00003865245,0.0015749735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021908481,0.000034028504,0.00009534755,0.000026143152,0.0009774824,0.00029433076,0.000038216862,0.00007670322,0.0000019425895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115653886,0.00009400821,0.008481354,0.00004049808,0.00014867178,0.000010669874,0.16812676,0.000042230702,0.000048733276,0.8181913,0.0039723613,0.0007277572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026266964,0.00031749904,0.030278264,0.00021776461,0.0005068509,0.000024115854,0.21777098,0.000077284814,0.00017417286,0.006370751,0.7413186,0.00031701848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1850617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9755993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81182057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001528603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028806253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014514066","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0103","title":"The artificial morality of private law: The persistence of an illusion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Moral rights; Political science; Property rights; Normative; Legal realism; Morality; Sociology; Legal profession; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.051750940863436866,"score_gpt":0.22016833041651132,"score_spread":0.16841738955307445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014514066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97964275,0.00014327515,0.00014589606,0.0029926074,0.00016080656,0.000091528214,0.000024034167,0.000008691154,0.016790425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995042,0.0001227866,0.00014809005,0.00012902523,0.0000460758,1.0260391e-8,1.7717547e-7,0.0000024462627,0.000047187146],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991237,0.00018934032,0.00015790523,0.00010953665,0.0003027382,0.000116765426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932855,0.000073925585,0.00026526547,0.00017098375,0.000077228724,0.000084040126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023163007,0.00005975564,0.00011922667,0.0000036142442,0.00073345564,0.000014225373,0.00069313886,0.00002754351,0.00017133288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006284752,0.00003832757,0.000117784824,0.000039969902,0.00072708266,0.00036020222,0.00013786284,0.00011673185,0.0000014507539],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006142052,0.0001822672,0.00015350207,0.000032386964,0.000022824226,0.000042501306,0.010003384,0.0002649919,0.6195162,0.36223203,0.00020980874,0.0067259227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025945303,0.0035032048,0.019693922,0.00022547369,0.0003185287,0.00015393562,0.046121005,0.011593666,0.7140606,0.011697294,0.18928908,0.0007487757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051160576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077319513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35053474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003342099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025425627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7733983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014659821","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0095","title":"The implications of property as self-government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Land tenure; Alienation; Land law; Property rights; Corporate governance; Scholarship; Property (philosophy); Political science; Government (linguistics); Common ownership; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.017524330141002003,"score_gpt":0.24212745615857714,"score_spread":0.22460312601757515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014659821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010586061,0.00019961064,0.0006375495,0.050165612,0.00003803072,0.00016666547,0.000016817341,0.00001792457,0.93817174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974187,0.00063228025,0.00064443046,0.000104918516,0.000063001164,5.4500166e-8,1.7167145e-7,0.0000015695551,0.0011348646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952775,0.000045376582,0.00007436911,0.000049348462,0.00022261788,0.0000805402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956805,0.000034586203,0.00012284354,0.00007315351,0.00009557951,0.00010581589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001576797,0.000026818589,0.0000526136,9.256697e-7,0.0011890051,0.000018511033,0.00035420456,0.000020227866,0.00029344874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018949042,0.000018461624,0.000057036166,0.000023801043,0.00015984589,0.00015973666,0.00005262928,0.000055560464,0.00000571766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023020228,0.000060498776,0.00055401097,0.0000033961096,0.00004640979,7.5211966e-7,0.017800288,0.000009965261,0.00057744706,0.97131836,0.0048481636,0.0047576935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110097375,0.00003477721,0.0014347484,0.0000029243665,0.000018375293,7.725058e-7,0.015615002,0.000017546514,0.00006782767,0.00048350176,0.98218644,0.000027969301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03524798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055292167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001802762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010654826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9711764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015089011","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0130","title":"The capabilities approach: A panacea for labour law’s ills?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Subject (documents); Politics; Panacea (medicine); Labour law; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017443473761506643,"score_gpt":0.2098335434216658,"score_spread":0.19239006966015915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015089011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008113164,0.00027451632,0.0034760574,0.0067139645,0.00013004633,0.00019210196,0.000031113363,0.000021368884,0.9810477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976344,0.00020862937,0.00070904044,0.00019459942,0.00013076061,1.2017277e-7,0.000001527912,0.0000022661693,0.0011186479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999549,0.000051554987,0.00008675316,0.000055545,0.00011474,0.00014246494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960095,0.00007538594,0.000077563374,0.000039728955,0.000094372095,0.00011198609],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003148901,0.00004177557,0.00008187846,0.0000026136543,0.0015853518,0.00009386477,0.00024719062,0.000036331036,0.00013274407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021408056,0.000037119484,0.00010180412,0.000015948179,0.00035690196,0.0010469784,0.000012732422,0.00005580101,0.0000026752214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062147556,0.000013881007,0.000029514507,0.000010473004,0.000025925374,3.7278062e-7,0.03430475,0.000024583822,9.185885e-7,0.9591596,0.0011546602,0.0052131433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026673052,0.00005191837,0.00004374361,0.000004966103,0.000011262871,6.181386e-7,0.10980479,0.000052696927,0.00000491098,0.0032769844,0.88643295,0.000048413858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025732176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15102722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98952127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120614684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061742394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022583908","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3796","title":"Destination-based cash-flow taxation: A critical appraisal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Economics; Double taxation; International taxation; Residence; Cash flow; Business; Multinational corporation; Intuition; Public economics; Microeconomics; Tax reform; Finance; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.02127260369165949,"score_gpt":0.24752137183647704,"score_spread":0.22624876814481756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022583908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14537498,0.00025007577,0.09475355,0.014834545,0.0034792246,0.0002493722,0.000018949397,0.00016281147,0.7408765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950635,0.0000040062437,0.0040394403,0.00016908297,0.0005082629,5.4342646e-8,0.0000042307615,0.000005340842,0.00020609706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994383,0.0000107976675,0.000107365224,0.00010404555,0.00021683297,0.00012267173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855524,0.00006879855,0.0007278846,0.00017714433,0.00044574792,0.000025208385],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021333892,0.00007653146,0.00010887027,0.000026553973,0.00147922,0.0002950236,0.00034630887,0.000039758204,0.0022034005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006168484,0.000085203676,0.00007496704,0.000018199524,0.00019923881,0.0022313509,0.00006484478,0.00009054776,0.00004714825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048685004,0.0005475234,0.06142969,0.00025878928,0.00007841451,0.00041874993,0.0004512515,0.0015078194,0.000756522,0.8640864,0.029413885,0.04056414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004270387,0.0000612068,0.243542,0.0002750282,0.0001811662,0.000034481196,0.0019497746,0.08644117,0.00008760197,0.0033711425,0.6591726,0.0006134484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012967238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029013718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006630995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004015528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026722079","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0054","title":"The Gross Indecency of Criminalizing HIV Non-Disclosure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Supreme court; Queer; Criminal code; Law; Parliament; Narrative; Reading (process); Deviance (statistics); Political science; Criminology; Promiscuity; Sociology; Criminal law; Gender studies; Psychology; Literature; Art; Politics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.016564982803276448,"score_gpt":0.24723187501469737,"score_spread":0.23066689221142092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026722079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35863176,0.008248826,0.00056586415,0.012358724,0.0006076326,0.00015480832,0.0000039979677,0.000029755205,0.61939865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958106,0.0028787716,0.0003031279,0.000037719605,0.000157988,6.7979e-9,3.0428077e-7,0.000002897989,0.0008085437],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926996,0.00011094977,0.00011099876,0.00006693784,0.00028658562,0.0001545614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942094,0.000062435516,0.00017200751,0.000060536302,0.00014955021,0.00013450571],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030497173,0.000049893562,0.00011627963,0.0000054018496,0.0014355072,0.000027391408,0.00041860252,0.00007423285,0.0005634504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037691527,0.000040290415,0.000103716535,0.000044553904,0.00043514455,0.00025716005,0.00004945944,0.00015332602,0.0000053622125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031979973,0.0000985869,0.01358444,0.00003430833,0.0002357914,0.00009003633,0.8866737,0.000075381875,0.0004983962,0.065246604,0.024269335,0.008873644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004947477,0.000106620406,0.0026787953,0.00007349563,0.00007836181,0.0000033962006,0.48849475,0.000038488673,0.00015847135,0.00049471005,0.5072792,0.00009892899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027680447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017275194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6371789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077081495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079867066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027621733","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0082","title":"Homosexuality and Prostitution: A Tale of Two Deviancies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Queer; Homosexuality; Criminalization; Mainstream; Politics; Gender studies; Sociology; Framing (construction); Criminology; Context (archaeology); Queer theory; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0194425250841066,"score_gpt":0.26364761702526873,"score_spread":0.24420509194116213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027621733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77170396,0.0073315226,0.0005526843,0.0034415284,0.00020733831,0.00012303272,0.000005393807,0.000027468155,0.21660706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768287,0.00087640935,0.00093116495,0.000036398564,0.00008725897,6.4985457e-9,3.4279884e-7,0.000001218161,0.000384306],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995337,0.00008353109,0.00007588963,0.000062391184,0.00015527947,0.00008917959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961364,0.000021547257,0.000100857695,0.00003417145,0.00010838661,0.0001213718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001924492,0.000037202022,0.00011179105,0.000004870833,0.00055842765,0.0000146020375,0.00012453592,0.0000440063,0.00051412557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028819348,0.000037406466,0.00003859183,0.000034238186,0.0005848353,0.00030298025,0.000034884655,0.0000747082,0.0000017291873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002568721,0.00016574269,0.029266797,0.00008430757,0.00023989832,0.00010018377,0.7119606,0.00005654292,0.0014738677,0.24119148,0.0034344308,0.011769292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017417251,0.00031378723,0.0055474704,0.00012531076,0.00012800105,0.000018290246,0.35222575,0.0000408458,0.0005783738,0.0015927322,0.637468,0.00021976745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039038528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022735618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6340335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056745597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007109756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039870728","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0058","title":"The 1969 Criminal Amendments: Constituting the Terms of Gay Resistance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Resistance (ecology); Human sexuality; Homosexuality; Criminal code; Criminology; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminal law","score_opus":0.036123578123288036,"score_gpt":0.27417815928338146,"score_spread":0.23805458116009343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039870728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036633648,0.0015725624,0.0003145726,0.008935787,0.00024052532,0.00011081452,0.00001584673,0.000013668381,0.95216256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964071,0.0005675394,0.00028650317,0.000120023564,0.00016852978,1.9801611e-8,1.7846222e-7,0.0000018585503,0.0024482321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914986,0.00018425594,0.00012256674,0.00006592774,0.00031493683,0.00016242967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934584,0.00015628726,0.00023769366,0.0000781751,0.0000917396,0.00009026651],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045810107,0.00004884744,0.000107277156,0.0000029545217,0.0021020158,0.00003977191,0.0004990079,0.000024877907,0.00044492647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006472229,0.00003376362,0.00006933194,0.000027651855,0.0013010922,0.00022219609,0.000058000205,0.000098608696,0.0000015486639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012007595,0.000015999123,0.0003273202,0.000011119004,0.000055504803,0.000014433485,0.2426921,0.0000043828295,0.00007128089,0.75064135,0.0048851958,0.0011612382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013238822,0.000033405337,0.000099620425,0.000019872035,0.00002839407,8.5508316e-7,0.4880603,0.000003155584,0.000022842163,0.0005528876,0.51101005,0.000036194386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031796023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112389125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012221196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008827266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039919733","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0100","title":"Angela Fernandez, <i>Pierson v. Post, The Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Professionalization; Legal culture; Political science; Law; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.023642886250249066,"score_gpt":0.30790902438735934,"score_spread":0.28426613813711027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039919733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022113739,0.0016166058,0.0033883613,0.7277051,0.0006807867,0.0007731381,0.000038290393,0.000026023903,0.2436579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936445,0.00030640585,0.00039129297,0.004742255,0.0001555311,3.0622786e-7,0.0000024972862,0.000002487346,0.0007547629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999459,0.00014789528,0.00007614621,0.00006235356,0.00016429898,0.00009027883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993364,0.00016125049,0.00020452784,0.000040814135,0.00020699586,0.00004998753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038590643,0.000038945946,0.00006212472,0.0000050197173,0.0014803242,0.00008230479,0.0001837373,0.000026175652,0.00015709708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000141029,0.00002654456,0.0000328902,0.00007944986,0.00033946845,0.0008023721,0.000021266273,0.00018202138,6.536054e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012027985,0.00004619038,0.000718152,0.00000553522,0.000029022634,0.0000013683482,0.14613432,0.000011868431,0.00007965224,0.83736885,0.010866684,0.004618089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022490887,0.000045997487,0.001722835,0.000007768089,0.000019187035,0.0000017700628,0.13446742,0.00004775142,0.00000507933,0.0001756254,0.863248,0.00003367566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20070994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40437067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97153074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010482651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001957738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042348065","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0043","title":"The constitutional office of the legislature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Normative; Constitutional theory; Political science; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional economics; Constitutional review; Sociology; Constitution; Physics","score_opus":0.016714622466399664,"score_gpt":0.22174458412907877,"score_spread":0.20502996166267912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042348065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045440635,0.0029266225,0.0003209635,0.022892337,0.00045911057,0.00007456425,0.000018439556,0.000007392233,0.9687565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883586,0.00055294007,0.000058974572,0.00016594883,0.00018275778,9.50922e-9,1.2268967e-7,4.6424603e-7,0.000202914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942726,0.00007994592,0.00006694242,0.000041717656,0.00029847867,0.00008564446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995419,0.00007515338,0.00011240115,0.00003534843,0.00018151,0.00005369047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017014283,0.000032248703,0.00006829088,0.0000015309516,0.0027830065,0.000011460337,0.0003366354,0.000029353741,0.0002191844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007992786,0.000021011421,0.000098170814,0.000034631397,0.0034496605,0.00014618637,0.00006423904,0.00009938949,0.0000023948392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004058147,0.000008531586,0.0006280538,7.659822e-7,0.000039044102,0.0000018033445,0.0028408337,0.000016184342,0.000029313209,0.9918842,0.0041503576,0.00036035752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016120817,0.000016135127,0.0037322575,0.000014222131,0.00002508261,0.000002272574,0.013926856,0.0000021503804,0.000010292785,0.0022768117,0.9797999,0.00003281354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038868736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14143907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007782498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029114354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043080976","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0031","title":"The office of ownership revisited","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Property (philosophy); Easement; Law and economics; Business; Property rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028994996894398883,"score_gpt":0.2555444730131005,"score_spread":0.22654947611870163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043080976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020596221,0.0010894114,0.0009194775,0.024045736,0.00006711271,0.00013200118,0.000015154496,0.000020052601,0.9531148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982829,0.0005737043,0.00034143418,0.000084144645,0.00009688429,8.17343e-9,3.2566848e-7,0.0000013186799,0.0006192579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955696,0.000078017896,0.000072518334,0.000043168864,0.00016766923,0.00008167329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995133,0.00006859348,0.00013436198,0.000058691458,0.00012380803,0.00010121821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026041514,0.000025098927,0.00006335017,0.0000020526395,0.00089245883,0.000017398523,0.0003419502,0.00002392141,0.00042329135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044110202,0.000020283273,0.000065331005,0.00003504041,0.00023231732,0.00016489522,0.000034903056,0.00006995299,0.000005330279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006193934,0.000019835972,0.0002804894,0.000005841973,0.000030851974,0.000002292998,0.014205656,0.000011097398,0.0002693289,0.9766263,0.0054803975,0.003006002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012816144,0.000023058374,0.0008606334,0.0000074346053,0.000015794134,4.0614523e-7,0.017705409,0.000017131179,0.000024756511,0.0001775989,0.9810116,0.000027981083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03245689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05127578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000629659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062110754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9739861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043467281","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0036","title":"Between sovereign and subject: the constitutional position of the official","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Sovereignty; Law; Duty; Political science; Constitutional law; Position (finance); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.019582561218891577,"score_gpt":0.23923233259021656,"score_spread":0.219649771371325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043467281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30382642,0.000229965,0.0012388481,0.006841821,0.00013850308,0.000114013514,0.00006532177,0.000008355488,0.6875368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950767,0.00003307323,0.000041952266,0.00020059664,0.0001865577,4.2305417e-9,1.7109585e-7,4.9688015e-7,0.000029477735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994661,0.00017877379,0.000061788036,0.000039212235,0.0001735594,0.00008056396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996437,0.00010745335,0.000074865115,0.000032427677,0.00006493003,0.000076666845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025406334,0.000027156322,0.000064191016,0.0000020155449,0.0008990828,0.000010610365,0.00021014237,0.000031416806,0.00032056568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006775943,0.000019396924,0.00005148791,0.000020095473,0.0022371493,0.00023177134,0.000042005566,0.00008407576,0.0000010096438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027102902,0.0000053113386,0.0010964335,0.0000016555847,0.000013168726,8.929118e-7,0.0030807222,0.0000052388928,0.0000834063,0.9954002,0.00007519829,0.00021066157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028282173,0.00060515746,0.20309393,0.00025355545,0.0005188653,0.00004424275,0.09996964,0.000087362445,0.0027661636,0.40085414,0.28846923,0.0005094875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071148337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022799012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6956813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057159334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012253196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043611909","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0032","title":"Office and contracting-out: an analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Odds; Phenomenon; Government (linguistics); Public office; Business; Service (business); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02467461157356531,"score_gpt":0.2708792790045017,"score_spread":0.24620466743093639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043611909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44279644,0.0004807194,0.010168378,0.012217707,0.000074877986,0.00014204852,0.000033686243,0.000053395685,0.53403276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985797,0.00015434757,0.00082476274,0.00011950652,0.00009265454,6.9743558e-9,8.6864617e-7,0.0000012127925,0.00022696563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996032,0.00006034817,0.000055573393,0.00007317545,0.00012575863,0.000081903425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995354,0.000030175564,0.00009103312,0.00004386453,0.00007843218,0.00022110526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017012662,0.000029718496,0.00009094507,0.00000600294,0.0007684638,0.0000398617,0.00015636803,0.000028750572,0.00086891436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017347133,0.00003323133,0.00005694013,0.000036446847,0.00012772053,0.00046221685,0.000024301335,0.00006736488,0.0000034562295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018072782,0.00017366195,0.0115389135,0.00000903562,0.0006529023,0.00003523981,0.18297704,0.00027521604,0.0008779517,0.79264605,0.0010577731,0.00957551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004042802,0.00006980424,0.014277264,0.0000034044883,0.0004079836,0.0000013089262,0.08454971,0.0007654457,0.000015774196,0.0001226621,0.89927155,0.00011082572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119104974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44979674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89821374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006091552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003681607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043982908","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0003","title":"Catalytic agents? Lon Fuller, James Milner, and the lawyer as social architect, 1950–69","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Scholarship; Law; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Variety (cybernetics); Legal education; Political science","score_opus":0.029968031947274987,"score_gpt":0.2937238616934155,"score_spread":0.26375582974614054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043982908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036200233,0.00057452015,0.00014621562,0.2755085,0.00033173498,0.00014427405,0.0000073277597,0.000021870756,0.68706536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945586,0.0004059149,0.00020332131,0.0020034967,0.00035892028,6.30728e-8,0.0000016754622,0.0000032286478,0.002464783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991886,0.00024619309,0.00009833735,0.000083529805,0.0002561371,0.0001271829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993892,0.00014119993,0.00016729103,0.000048774746,0.00012966625,0.00012391104],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044380405,0.00005428052,0.000105419924,0.000010892044,0.0018918328,0.00010764561,0.0002463014,0.000044396613,0.0022781577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017447559,0.000048089452,0.00006905829,0.00006807751,0.00063820696,0.00063715444,0.000046992634,0.00027973304,0.00002413928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032795043,0.00007159803,0.00024535638,0.0000093462295,0.00011905065,0.000013674291,0.38923645,0.000004690068,0.000018012342,0.53489536,0.06318595,0.011872552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082654704,0.00003263396,0.0005614362,0.000005050907,0.000050823735,0.0000064227584,0.087677956,0.000017049082,0.000004786363,0.00093916006,0.9098142,0.00006396308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17601478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07476541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95835835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010664175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002870963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044407179","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2019-0131","title":"Modern treaty making and the limits of the law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Sleep Society","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Aotearoa; Negotiation; Autonomy; Politics; Citizenship; Political science; Law; Indigenous; Colonialism; Pluralism (philosophy); Arms control","score_opus":0.02151780873752061,"score_gpt":0.25466739552123835,"score_spread":0.23314958678371775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044407179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13852143,0.00097257225,0.00009920038,0.004875306,0.00020812856,0.00016366261,0.000004124833,0.000006470527,0.8551491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676806,0.0021428324,0.00012623634,0.000093186245,0.00014593321,3.6480594e-9,8.8760906e-8,0.0000016863169,0.0007219813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935204,0.00023253344,0.000074331525,0.000052345018,0.00017891834,0.00010985584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995725,0.0000609356,0.00014560722,0.00005866379,0.00009540469,0.00006686912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032014557,0.000035637342,0.000092884045,0.0000028794486,0.0059369877,0.000015485852,0.00024979448,0.000038347192,0.000119249285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000026185917,0.000021255604,0.00006253088,0.000020700985,0.0006720995,0.00019590918,0.0000034184686,0.00008269397,5.244198e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003923467,0.000011151928,0.00012564634,0.0000051489274,0.000012763902,5.773303e-7,0.43643785,0.0000039456145,0.0000012805015,0.56313765,0.000030705607,0.00019404615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010361193,0.000059895137,0.0015281757,0.000050122664,0.00008440852,0.0000068839104,0.09361632,0.0000951546,0.0000374419,0.0043343464,0.89907026,0.00008084553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49819413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97601634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89903957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102581565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063866226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99535716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045202888","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2019-0136","title":"A theory of mistaken assumptions in contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Appeal; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Freedom of contract; Common law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.033215750537898256,"score_gpt":0.2628744662742217,"score_spread":0.2296587157363234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045202888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0615676,0.00034446488,0.0012732038,0.0052404385,0.000041369538,0.00012292231,0.000036077618,0.000013613693,0.9313603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898446,0.00012663905,0.000505305,0.000111813606,0.000048082537,2.5553312e-8,5.801312e-7,0.0000015721814,0.00022150297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952424,0.000103545586,0.00009259596,0.000054613567,0.00013435636,0.00009063639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996061,0.000060714727,0.00010720608,0.00004796905,0.00007037954,0.00010767182],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027976476,0.00003077821,0.000095776915,0.0000049215605,0.00032583272,0.000011510542,0.00022339707,0.00003636918,0.0014128486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020406887,0.000034342174,0.00006604848,0.000027840846,0.00025406905,0.00027546627,0.000022152959,0.0000894539,0.0000041544295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003215843,0.000044379278,0.0003770078,0.0000030161325,0.000013563973,0.0000046236423,0.015112424,0.000018630784,0.00027222035,0.9833646,0.0001676477,0.00058977434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008817895,0.00006219527,0.008276144,0.0000308796,0.000039906896,0.0000016152572,0.045722954,0.000056616384,0.000069491405,0.005924546,0.93882954,0.00010429556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1348003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40044007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111553585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070642775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048661938","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0084","title":"Law and macroeconomics as mainstream","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Recession; Economics; Convention; Great recession; Keynesian economics; Economic analysis; Perspective (graphical); Mainstream economics; Monetary policy; Macroeconomics; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Applied economics; Classical economics","score_opus":0.014874719734636714,"score_gpt":0.17451865062101682,"score_spread":0.1596439308863801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048661938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14052114,0.0011519586,0.0007698431,0.001049995,0.00017107796,0.00004835914,0.00010528146,0.000013406739,0.8561689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675095,0.0008375946,0.0010147846,0.0010106609,0.00008660687,2.533304e-8,0.0000022943095,0.0000053120466,0.00029175804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995041,0.00000962242,0.0002024769,0.00015028872,0.000009796666,0.00012371462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948424,0.0000148221725,0.0002154557,0.000089698464,0.000014965916,0.00018083061],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014316669,0.00007390978,0.00021893287,0.000012101896,0.00035193097,0.000034417004,0.00018567638,0.00005545015,0.0029182276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000973983,0.00010345621,0.00008849017,0.000010466526,0.00024262158,0.00070021144,0.00006530309,0.00010545595,0.00015539057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004027151,0.000019747538,0.0006110754,0.000006172569,0.000050530205,0.00000982708,0.0008827273,0.000042680585,0.0000101543765,0.99775326,0.00032325843,0.0002502692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011880179,0.00017642674,0.0005787772,0.000010814916,0.000015770996,0.00007294495,0.002366708,0.00037434458,0.00005696085,0.062324315,0.9326291,0.00020578463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008554888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068324623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001290813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001554512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084730852","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0060","title":"Bureaucracy without alienation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Bureaucracy; Relevance (law); Statutory law; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Administrative law; Hegelianism; Deliberative democracy; Political philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.025055761804479246,"score_gpt":0.27097926936160094,"score_spread":0.2459235075571217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084730852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022882205,0.00014862245,0.005565416,0.017892815,0.00007671162,0.000098371966,0.000007141779,0.000034953344,0.95329374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763185,0.0001661089,0.001207514,0.00017879729,0.00016829939,1.4136726e-8,7.8174025e-7,0.0000017445566,0.0006449065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959344,0.000043016607,0.000053373857,0.000055850516,0.00017270599,0.00008159151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962103,0.000012360562,0.00008333631,0.000038108057,0.00009905913,0.00014610092],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012566402,0.000028075441,0.000058111153,0.0000032218556,0.00072645454,0.000023936582,0.00020166823,0.000028676592,0.0011089621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017338558,0.00003124795,0.00004710322,0.000023206743,0.000112038055,0.0004254554,0.000026240226,0.000061968574,0.000015170137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023178129,0.000033251737,0.00095630175,0.0000031041034,0.00002178254,0.0000048146126,0.030975368,0.00003649916,0.0003293754,0.96000135,0.0037418802,0.0038731014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021438049,0.000022959943,0.0009586485,0.0000043497053,0.000014946533,7.8870266e-7,0.012312179,0.00008939801,0.000022353775,0.000557033,0.98575723,0.000045718487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06961567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09230404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113348025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057883655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085937296","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0040","title":"Office-holding and officiality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Law; Jurisprudence; Orthodoxy; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Subject (documents); Philosophy of law; Private law; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03044656825647138,"score_gpt":0.25779265439418997,"score_spread":0.2273460861377186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085937296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20749912,0.00036921105,0.0020927088,0.010028887,0.00007841224,0.00010138646,0.000014284074,0.000035337645,0.7797807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844676,0.00031368478,0.0008467281,0.000119456665,0.00013616087,5.9193006e-9,2.6353678e-7,0.0000013954243,0.0001355245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963206,0.000045876586,0.00005381297,0.00006189439,0.00012266629,0.00008367438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999658,0.000022358057,0.000067292225,0.000033213943,0.000056718876,0.00016240697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016725485,0.000028190736,0.00006612607,0.0000025730517,0.0008479544,0.000027409156,0.00014475077,0.000029007002,0.00064099213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019181905,0.000032368716,0.000035695302,0.000019635723,0.00016642676,0.00027316535,0.00004405901,0.00006711019,0.0000045881907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004849926,0.000035557292,0.0011455595,0.00000918837,0.000025873362,0.000008443956,0.029835658,0.000016759885,0.00047114847,0.9587606,0.0016094517,0.008033218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020535148,0.000024947225,0.0034541204,0.00000743806,0.000017585176,0.0000011563862,0.0208776,0.000052942243,0.00001662168,0.00021365043,0.9750721,0.000056500947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08036886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10851489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97346264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073451345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052111565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.925755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086279047","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0053","title":"Conscientious refusal to provide medically assisted dying","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Patient rights; Health care; Nursing; Medicine; Law; Political science; Public relations; Family medicine","score_opus":0.07855758155362169,"score_gpt":0.34001142564304593,"score_spread":0.26145384408942424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086279047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5888709,0.004100392,0.021717988,0.028083153,0.00070789765,0.00061258825,0.00005417254,0.000119713266,0.35573322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730403,0.00031596655,0.02463845,0.001236151,0.00016856698,3.8323336e-8,0.0000049363753,0.000008044179,0.0005875689],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918,0.000043452234,0.00016305351,0.00011729922,0.00035860436,0.00013759166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902785,0.00004659734,0.00013818954,0.00008325877,0.00028212293,0.0004219728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000152736,0.00007099449,0.00026585665,0.000019666999,0.00012398124,0.0000069211246,0.0001580628,0.000051782547,0.00087702804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018902877,0.00006902191,0.000108361906,0.000050143804,0.00013943008,0.00014228636,0.00006219435,0.00013495823,0.000009306171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012949888,0.0016272173,0.09055216,0.0016197729,0.003578164,0.0073008714,0.15535189,0.00012057823,0.3176886,0.023762446,0.19032182,0.1951266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038928578,0.0013728015,0.0063404883,0.0010945871,0.0002974067,0.00011718276,0.010683687,0.0001446601,0.002940082,0.00003337476,0.9729073,0.00017556586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030038129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036814292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7825855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016450998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015322135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9602842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086337398","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0038","title":"Office and profession in the design of modern institutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Marxism and Critical Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Function (biology); Bureaucracy; Public relations; Nexus (standard); Element (criminal law); Political science; Work (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Public administration; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06259458247983132,"score_gpt":0.22740598599554662,"score_spread":0.1648114035157153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086337398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07912848,0.0020855512,0.017895142,0.00438207,0.00017186592,0.00025749358,0.000029276356,0.000014560251,0.89603555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994408,0.00007919066,0.00018233391,0.00014310614,0.000042230615,1.5879234e-8,3.2145167e-7,9.846581e-7,0.00011100583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996904,0.00009432347,0.000059374594,0.00003527856,0.00007214163,0.000048477606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981695,0.00004784879,0.000033186065,0.00003283087,0.000038121932,0.00003108071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000139927,0.000028864382,0.00006653344,0.0000049511295,0.00023996927,0.000011095346,0.0001112854,0.000013913567,0.0007683573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010437058,0.000021304308,0.000021525808,0.000004134147,0.0002512402,0.00021818525,0.000023793236,0.00007267947,8.98026e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102567916,0.000036890724,0.000010644908,0.000017295906,0.0000064339188,0.000008570068,0.05295338,0.00002302973,0.00006746571,0.94525504,0.00037319126,0.0011454762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031239404,0.000912752,0.0009514881,0.00033953314,0.00017694953,0.00003342401,0.43096307,0.0033448911,0.00008327839,0.05138885,0.5083536,0.00032824712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017234609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058196015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92031235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011473878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018940815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8412973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090799164","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0062","title":"Contracts, markets, and justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contract theory; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Sociology; Position (finance); Social contract; Law; Distributive property; Economics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.018782845608439687,"score_gpt":0.2456214040471554,"score_spread":0.22683855843871573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090799164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026805691,0.0010873888,0.0014938029,0.01827073,0.00009078405,0.00009179838,0.000014264807,0.000023072113,0.95212245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673814,0.0012157515,0.0011732094,0.0002653015,0.00015685889,8.052103e-9,2.7034704e-7,0.0000014341246,0.0004490305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996686,0.000044499968,0.000045337474,0.00005258199,0.000107800515,0.00008120208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996279,0.000038754042,0.00005995292,0.000028806671,0.000059635066,0.00018497703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014337177,0.000026535616,0.000058956684,0.0000020626037,0.00073822605,0.00002589785,0.000132959,0.000027315298,0.00082460535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027668806,0.000029630264,0.000026840651,0.000013031517,0.00015271197,0.00029534494,0.00003039954,0.00006660534,0.00000423044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007264425,0.000031613687,0.00029996733,0.000012074147,0.000032221007,0.000019164754,0.02064233,0.000005125867,0.00023015519,0.9635096,0.007327101,0.007818001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023104307,0.000016192822,0.0021451048,0.0000047735994,0.000042045715,0.0000019878273,0.01834009,0.000048872527,0.000004682089,0.00017232163,0.978954,0.00003883971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030278314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045191366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97162694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005453937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044219203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9761791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106304731","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0066","title":"Notwithstanding rights, review, or remedy? On the notwithstanding clause and the operation of legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.04378781811301545,"score_gpt":0.26094789933883056,"score_spread":0.2171600812258151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106304731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025067158,0.018606655,0.005736602,0.14599918,0.00052253646,0.0010924378,0.000026525307,0.000033306576,0.80291563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889787,0.010309242,0.00008233654,0.00042898042,0.00012542373,4.8821715e-8,2.5742293e-7,0.0000010086344,0.000073997086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927735,0.00018924836,0.00010979171,0.000060492897,0.00029091898,0.00007221994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946135,0.0001849835,0.00015701856,0.00003714403,0.00011657883,0.000042939446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006645791,0.000044791363,0.00013183604,0.000004743401,0.0019826854,0.000020763036,0.00013968142,0.0000221085,0.00032712176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014495064,0.000023837692,0.00004867241,0.000041519157,0.0007355116,0.000269898,0.000030488442,0.00008391065,0.0000010122162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003297161,0.0000073269816,0.00015730727,0.0000086872005,0.0000452342,0.000003211586,0.01542118,0.000012060091,0.000022313732,0.98195577,0.0016224231,0.0004147786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035587982,0.00045582905,0.0017897519,0.0020352658,0.00049625314,0.0000121925805,0.1005113,0.00039885083,0.00013289916,0.012997413,0.87729156,0.00031987912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031982213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1014858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011113708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006128056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106859394","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0067","title":"Ownership and offices: the building blocks of the legal order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legitimacy; Order (exchange); Possession (linguistics); Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Property rights; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0216388014336906,"score_gpt":0.24339178786570423,"score_spread":0.22175298643201363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106859394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49748525,0.0009056401,0.0012443863,0.075382024,0.0001640062,0.00026060408,0.000017491351,0.000019746636,0.42452085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987916,0.00010771658,0.00039632095,0.00015978747,0.00009395808,1.411296e-8,5.381911e-8,0.000001332683,0.00044922088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999571,0.00007047557,0.000060298258,0.00005134326,0.00016770305,0.00007917907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999625,0.000047239828,0.00011458615,0.000061127306,0.00008439605,0.000067606736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020807773,0.000030594736,0.000059703692,0.0000020835616,0.0010107892,0.000026980486,0.00036585447,0.000025929852,0.00025810782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030563053,0.00001952099,0.000049147464,0.000043201686,0.00036776013,0.00018966838,0.00008153889,0.000101861806,3.9016362e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029202407,0.000025897441,0.0013920885,0.000007271093,0.000045360706,0.0000017077496,0.0383061,0.00009869134,0.0006834819,0.95578116,0.0017370373,0.0018920084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019846972,0.00002013105,0.0017320685,0.000013242574,0.00003720056,0.0000020980135,0.037550487,0.000093268405,0.000072585506,0.00027426684,0.9599638,0.000042402437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0684041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10007118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95822674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004203429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007913704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93779945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107133429","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0059","title":"The geometry of property","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Dominion; Property (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Horizontal and vertical; Geometry; Law and economics; Property rights; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Geology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012833805231550914,"score_gpt":0.21276409291767012,"score_spread":0.1999302876861192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107133429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16524078,0.002147765,0.0003753704,0.008872567,0.00015745212,0.00012849945,0.000008397814,0.000028119372,0.823041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975297,0.0002546888,0.00018706683,0.000046178455,0.000041895637,1.3235209e-8,4.2996035e-7,0.0000029207931,0.0019371463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992996,0.000111365465,0.0001068115,0.00007184104,0.00024995426,0.00016043184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993392,0.000050747403,0.00007583519,0.000116184354,0.00028237238,0.00013562365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022692808,0.00004949338,0.00011763033,0.000005583329,0.0003859032,0.000012007321,0.00041934036,0.000043900836,0.00090582366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101126825,0.00003100518,0.00010809926,0.000047043533,0.0002649006,0.00018510364,0.000115109855,0.00013303237,0.000004136364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019484095,0.00018708232,0.0016311524,0.00011101965,0.00037792392,0.00013321485,0.004320113,0.004432581,0.0013924857,0.8686617,0.0064377245,0.11036659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006317183,0.00029169605,0.0010475176,0.000011137169,0.000019058916,0.000012294096,0.012721005,0.00046808278,0.00045381242,0.001678158,0.9825922,0.00007328176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07658902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0396146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013114385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007577034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107210760","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0085","title":"Policing and public office","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Order (exchange); Public office; Law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Public order; State (computer science); Ancien regime; Sociology; Business; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03162895750013965,"score_gpt":0.19954860960417878,"score_spread":0.16791965210403914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107210760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8263719,0.00034581116,0.00070090726,0.0062766094,0.00014686774,0.000055387947,0.000010563507,0.00003928334,0.16605264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987259,0.00022942392,0.0002488069,0.0005958162,0.00006927975,2.2023339e-9,8.762428e-8,0.0000025354414,0.00012818647],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957085,0.000041585772,0.000055756984,0.00009537059,0.00011848079,0.00011794188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964774,0.000026021493,0.00006539573,0.000044406508,0.000024742201,0.0001917179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000038603197,0.00004495906,0.00007771167,0.0000071334416,0.00031182944,0.000024924537,0.00018472667,0.000020977694,0.0006095685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052043135,0.000045784986,0.000035851226,0.000025338713,0.00010717453,0.0005245074,0.000074350355,0.00008393492,0.0000074318223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033802204,0.00022511794,0.0052067456,0.000089061985,0.00004948608,0.0006904045,0.016042618,0.000046705085,0.6022361,0.3266132,0.01232649,0.036136083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004265369,0.001071741,0.018232148,0.000097807155,0.00009191591,0.00077695766,0.012647887,0.0026185086,0.02313204,0.00073834177,0.93558484,0.0007424246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008100945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060361116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92325836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033805012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018670371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107770851","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2020-0056","title":"A unified model of public law: Charter values and reasonableness review in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Administrative law; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Normative; Judicial review; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.040249437279116576,"score_gpt":0.2285426591580825,"score_spread":0.1882932218789659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107770851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11457624,0.072745815,0.00047710966,0.041849643,0.00018401029,0.0003173835,0.00007060929,0.000014736612,0.7697644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812864,0.018076366,0.000104883424,0.00046626077,0.000024591904,2.6804763e-8,3.392757e-7,8.339788e-7,0.000040287716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945277,0.000079118865,0.000088874884,0.000060325452,0.00021639686,0.00010253961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999632,0.000021449225,0.00008130735,0.000024649373,0.00013417154,0.00010639859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021478275,0.00003791706,0.00016095374,0.000003820756,0.00034033592,0.0000056054223,0.00012986298,0.000016750002,0.00013382018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002553168,0.000039068833,0.000027784305,0.000030987714,0.00028030254,0.0002782151,0.0000399065,0.000050940962,1.8491e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003055709,0.000023107988,0.0031918136,0.00008520206,0.000051926294,0.000020571615,0.0056931465,0.000034765108,0.00002094359,0.98612297,0.0018635977,0.0028613743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045494884,0.0003184379,0.021542149,0.004484633,0.0005100715,0.000020842146,0.2589708,0.002741386,0.000049621307,0.062077936,0.6434866,0.0012480351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99847925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9240451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026941323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074811897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26176232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108520199","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0100","title":"The question of fairness in contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; State (computer science); Political science; Law enforcement; Rule of law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016863510070994417,"score_gpt":0.27115745184663353,"score_spread":0.25429394177563913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108520199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11611901,0.0007680076,0.0017292892,0.024123685,0.00013832218,0.00022149357,0.000015146812,0.000019099558,0.85686594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994045,0.0002698744,0.00013321357,0.000051063493,0.00004950342,1.9411333e-8,2.1828811e-7,9.72373e-7,0.000090646194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995941,0.00008576376,0.000075287506,0.000038797738,0.00013237304,0.00007367303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996657,0.000054123302,0.00010048038,0.00003811032,0.00007818175,0.00006343582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029356347,0.00002283094,0.00006173891,0.0000020688005,0.0005160607,0.000015763997,0.0002163744,0.0000266436,0.0001379951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019209223,0.00002022596,0.00003948408,0.000022772268,0.00023843697,0.000252669,0.000021583337,0.000071917835,0.0000015775151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002382513,0.000016046053,0.00042782185,0.0000015259949,0.000005520486,0.0000018372173,0.0066786865,0.000023812378,0.00010738204,0.9913685,0.00009921212,0.0012458336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005030497,0.00004952302,0.008344994,0.000022864127,0.000015900167,9.4052587e-7,0.0272706,0.00014443943,0.00008869461,0.0029280633,0.96056837,0.00006258954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30248407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65224105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98844045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098387354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051095543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7021608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109455559","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0068","title":"Private law offices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Representation (politics); Private law; Commercial law; Business; Identity (music); Task (project management); Political science; Public law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.022886487446781616,"score_gpt":0.2503122336098992,"score_spread":0.22742574616311756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109455559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021660019,0.00020533628,0.00085701724,0.009596293,0.000062904444,0.00006750415,0.000009335495,0.000030216943,0.96751136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742633,0.0002013022,0.0014252594,0.00032401373,0.00018201997,1.164949e-8,5.1902276e-7,0.0000020479717,0.00043852083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995516,0.00004469741,0.000061397106,0.00006559941,0.00016923764,0.00010750052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996015,0.000017917351,0.000087709064,0.000049383376,0.000064160275,0.00017933449],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000121310884,0.000034106455,0.00007158814,0.000002260059,0.0009736791,0.000033094973,0.00031250063,0.00003225427,0.0014852231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007963751,0.000037413964,0.00006200446,0.000022758055,0.00022413628,0.00042428105,0.00004931667,0.00007709112,0.000022673723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001272777,0.000016787619,0.000095520314,0.000002295081,0.000013277406,0.000004715763,0.008955985,0.000011543873,0.00014896363,0.98901856,0.001122977,0.00059661886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016223668,0.000023748324,0.00027763963,0.0000047886806,0.000012732115,6.7528435e-7,0.0074326824,0.000018991403,0.000034449324,0.0005709431,0.991415,0.000046105684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104048744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20459372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000895697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004440405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111648035","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0039","title":"Private law rights as democratic participation: Kelsen on private law and (economic) democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Private law; Law; Public law; Ideology; Political science; Comparative law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02063517685177603,"score_gpt":0.25169710591330874,"score_spread":0.23106192906153272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111648035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20988622,0.00024977094,0.000084621424,0.008941892,0.00018675871,0.00012519077,0.00000881373,0.000028401566,0.7804883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805295,0.00024243367,0.0003075269,0.0009828303,0.00027330298,8.583642e-8,8.330413e-7,0.0000025732957,0.00013747736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991886,0.00011177905,0.00014397112,0.00014381522,0.00021793642,0.00019388385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942064,0.00007543506,0.00014504854,0.00005320755,0.000056621608,0.00024906988],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016479999,0.00009014991,0.0001868224,0.000006169163,0.0028670984,0.0000496926,0.00019504082,0.000053292184,0.00061113486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019212814,0.00009068827,0.000070177615,0.000020405447,0.0009336616,0.00058381545,0.00007388893,0.00010463697,0.000044130218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008700545,0.000025475596,0.000636413,0.0000026831428,0.00006936101,0.000026314772,0.0040108436,0.000024065062,0.000015886117,0.9945001,0.00037357316,0.00022830511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010256994,0.00031558942,0.003761766,0.00006428193,0.00012162981,0.0000067666424,0.0028646751,0.00004757765,0.0001358984,0.22052597,0.7708664,0.00026376176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13610202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29396603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7881667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021286479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058260695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113173929","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2020-0110","title":"Taking tort seriously","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.029116114515872076,"score_gpt":0.2620778172179014,"score_spread":0.23296170270202934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113173929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032608394,0.00019620135,0.0018201005,0.008621135,0.00008146293,0.000067339046,0.000005645499,0.00003086971,0.95656884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976192,0.00015465965,0.0013317304,0.00020051995,0.00019956025,1.0050162e-8,3.1162418e-7,0.000001928551,0.0004920974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960107,0.000033684308,0.000054503034,0.000057676123,0.00015417745,0.00009891514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996109,0.000011697726,0.00010761271,0.000040703257,0.00006740906,0.00016168991],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000112135865,0.000029532697,0.000063369946,0.0000024865801,0.00084477564,0.000026186139,0.00024526773,0.00002887998,0.0025971893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014765523,0.00003411329,0.000058327023,0.000021794387,0.00010894807,0.00033483357,0.000038903137,0.00006992343,0.000013613293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033348184,0.00003752463,0.0014953581,0.0000058742444,0.000039633527,0.000028194443,0.055139206,0.00004369595,0.00049765763,0.9283493,0.004664799,0.009665392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014725229,0.000022799719,0.0016539722,0.0000051916295,0.000012102235,0.0000015405384,0.01654358,0.000026933863,0.000013074721,0.00014351966,0.98138225,0.000047811653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12044641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17771839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9767174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012833992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074312426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121146652","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0014","title":"Reflecting back on the future of labour law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Labour law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Collective bargaining; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025781302255975545,"score_gpt":0.2652584007141061,"score_spread":0.23947709845813056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121146652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1109518,0.00026540234,0.000047159363,0.030252332,0.0003158623,0.000088209265,0.00002409279,0.000011290166,0.85804385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630886,0.00029099538,0.00031242403,0.0015888087,0.0003600275,5.505519e-9,2.482155e-7,0.0000025518004,0.0011360708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940455,0.00012715168,0.0000710303,0.00005696897,0.00023056625,0.000109734974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995557,0.0000386195,0.00013308335,0.000058828315,0.00012065327,0.000093136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002338168,0.000040230738,0.000084099534,0.0000034475404,0.0009246684,0.000018455405,0.00029339726,0.00003801797,0.0042287153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012583832,0.000031478772,0.00006787479,0.00004110874,0.00015800718,0.00021357478,0.00003509687,0.00011923666,0.0000025396928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025502479,0.000020979951,0.000104222374,0.000001946474,0.00002628611,0.000003304534,0.013262225,0.0000055441947,0.00018227522,0.98279774,0.0028473649,0.00072261016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020941993,0.000081602026,0.0011109845,0.000014748679,0.0000102859,2.9792494e-7,0.04735007,0.0000022166425,0.00008971186,0.0005816915,0.9505103,0.000038629896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08494415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33036005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98221606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000898588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004593008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121219761","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.403","title":"Culture and Competitive Resource Regulation: A Liberal Economic Alternative to Sui Generis Aboriginal Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006731780988225742,"score_gpt":0.24147619663305475,"score_spread":0.234744415644829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121219761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36465052,0.0004702353,0.00022267354,0.0005243751,0.00037465664,0.00016781552,0.000034916262,0.00001825402,0.6335366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794163,0.00024001984,0.0030255145,0.00010027662,0.0013446229,7.688895e-8,0.000004323746,0.000005906402,0.015862936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991731,0.0001404003,0.00009728612,0.00011028954,0.00018904668,0.0002898808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993448,0.000026433512,0.00013381072,0.00006896114,0.00009952977,0.00032643342],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000291575,0.000087730914,0.00015410568,0.000019676576,0.001974874,0.000056728048,0.00020111153,0.000071259,0.0018813515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000015845214,0.00007984547,0.0000631513,0.00001881807,0.00028494422,0.00079691067,0.000028192875,0.0000978414,0.00001469342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068413494,0.000030514075,0.0007387609,0.000001640116,0.000046248017,0.000008518121,0.17976165,0.000018138106,0.000014707232,0.81648916,0.0026164036,0.00020586139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031076485,0.00007522488,0.0034417824,0.000017946017,0.000027348338,0.000017987008,0.015078329,0.000004196481,0.00005416326,0.0008918515,0.97995925,0.00012115216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18348682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5922838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97734284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000649983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095766445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121572313","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0038","title":"Sizing up private law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simplicity; Private law; Law and economics; Law; Function (biology); Political science; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Public law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01597979342325995,"score_gpt":0.17613633175462592,"score_spread":0.16015653833136598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121572313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19062108,0.0016124934,0.000490328,0.0001358409,0.0017555554,0.00011257983,0.000040012423,0.00001735333,0.80521476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696755,0.00041458182,0.00037765974,0.000121483026,0.00018925684,3.1188048e-8,0.0000021475173,0.000011745624,0.0019155231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991675,0.000016812191,0.00035176866,0.0001970774,0.00003512352,0.00023169113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907297,0.000021885906,0.0005343155,0.0002117198,0.00003732506,0.00012180399],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041374337,0.00008657198,0.0004012674,0.000026616231,0.00027416868,0.000051757015,0.00034875554,0.00009391092,0.003524838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005807541,0.00013516672,0.00019082885,0.000018223554,0.00012479599,0.0008148867,0.00007473511,0.00011707112,0.0005377996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031967404,0.000024218942,0.011218718,0.000014993943,0.00008104388,0.0000050516314,0.00084044714,0.00003584442,0.000030760773,0.98716545,0.0003960693,0.00015545021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020610956,0.00016693272,0.0048370296,0.000062494226,0.000015988502,0.000031131058,0.0017609302,0.00032480905,0.00007117961,0.05524151,0.9350424,0.00038453692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06139367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02329102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9346463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039916122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013511994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121922778","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0065","title":"Regional Competition Law Agreements: An Important Step For Antitrust Enforcement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Publishing; Enforcement; Politics; The Renaissance; Indigenous; Political science; Slavic languages; Economic history; Sociology; Law; Media studies; History; Classics; Art history","score_opus":0.02003147405143842,"score_gpt":0.21157537182185143,"score_spread":0.191543897770413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121922778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12290525,0.00090592576,0.103650235,0.0011035113,0.0020978665,0.0004329605,0.00058911555,0.000050420334,0.7682647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99205357,0.00030407784,0.0063649644,0.0002322605,0.00014305503,1.9984246e-7,0.000062870706,0.0000067967144,0.0008322233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929655,0.000010848646,0.0003194916,0.00016012098,0.00006377355,0.00014923494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991611,0.000009477564,0.0004129825,0.00017398658,0.00010776377,0.00013466911],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035359894,0.000082755694,0.00022260012,0.00004042359,0.00041237968,0.00003789831,0.00023116497,0.00005545918,0.016448967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000380879,0.00010417431,0.00020043123,0.000023141058,0.00009076705,0.0005443913,0.000024917008,0.00010226573,0.000020019601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045556375,0.00011425197,0.0014275507,0.0000072476014,0.00009345781,0.0000038053058,0.0001714969,0.000008646676,0.00013491896,0.99721336,0.00062670046,0.00015298654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015259527,0.00022712091,0.0020963727,0.000013954006,0.00004447428,0.000020659105,0.0015048769,0.003009728,0.00005044256,0.015254652,0.9760326,0.00021916442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022159291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11334094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98195875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008208766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013995923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121924561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.275","title":"EXCLUSION AND EXCLUSIVITY IN PROPERTY LAW","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Setter; Position (finance); Property law; Business; Tangible property; Law; Boundary (topology); Real property; Political science; Sociology; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.023045131689279037,"score_gpt":0.2465368943110173,"score_spread":0.22349176262173825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121924561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31327897,0.00024706093,0.00012709109,0.0015850159,0.000043870547,0.00009839998,0.0000031834584,0.000011337517,0.68460506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706227,0.0007981037,0.00044441383,0.000051021474,0.000047176083,2.7064466e-8,2.381886e-7,0.0000015710339,0.0015951922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995344,0.00006958297,0.00006242159,0.00007148166,0.00015235835,0.000109753564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997188,0.00001853582,0.000055647568,0.00005480061,0.0000558327,0.000096424315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023794344,0.000035215573,0.000077998106,0.000006933059,0.0014474259,0.000011305299,0.00014436345,0.000041192667,0.00030342108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000074026257,0.000030469157,0.000029596675,0.000023057064,0.00039997164,0.00046078395,0.00006421795,0.00008522046,0.0000023308742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072814866,0.00024104815,0.007508669,0.000009740302,0.000015351992,0.00010034831,0.058698133,0.000020318843,0.00078104803,0.92453426,0.0012746465,0.006743609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053347263,0.00004183078,0.01325945,0.000021242491,0.0000069070497,0.000023010743,0.007266921,0.00003153187,0.000029971834,0.0009852322,0.9777099,0.000090568916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4795797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7218105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019636037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006219808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021911","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0215","title":"A theory of redressive justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Undoing; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Enforcement; Tort; Political science; Law; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.015587830290980638,"score_gpt":0.25685699440608467,"score_spread":0.24126916411510405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122021911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019382516,0.0001422105,0.0072972164,0.0005890049,0.00008847466,0.000045251076,0.000005824024,0.0000081819635,0.9724413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968604,0.00014885156,0.001283282,0.000026855752,0.000101686266,1.1722325e-8,2.2889174e-7,0.0000014155266,0.0015772796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995334,0.00013229343,0.00006294335,0.000044737822,0.0001452595,0.00008137456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947596,0.00009179294,0.00014667565,0.000071472205,0.00013943591,0.00007468847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004713764,0.000026313259,0.000072935705,0.00000578271,0.000589562,0.0000081091775,0.00024196133,0.00003228128,0.0008120735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048548132,0.000027486003,0.000055481938,0.000016980177,0.0002735948,0.0002042346,0.000031434894,0.00005576981,0.000003715913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019099863,0.000023960174,0.00004346731,0.000004093774,0.000011868832,7.662152e-7,0.008105277,0.000010481839,0.00013750225,0.9882867,0.0005224326,0.0028343978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041269558,0.00006012491,0.0018101494,0.000033839937,0.00011661613,0.0000025065651,0.055033293,0.000033133205,0.000105520936,0.017825786,0.92448884,0.00007752052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033774577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055178933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97747785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007639043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005138369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9726596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122025944","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3558","title":"The utopian promise of private law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Dominion; Economic Justice; Private property; Utopia; Law and economics; Private law; Distributive property; Function (biology); Law; Sociology; Distributive justice; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02501029058460926,"score_gpt":0.2639183396345651,"score_spread":0.23890804904995586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122025944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016077287,0.00015599065,0.00015184822,0.013324234,0.00020201787,0.00006220621,0.000008622885,0.000009965048,0.97000784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973488,0.0003862748,0.00017476775,0.000062965104,0.00012855101,1.0113757e-8,4.4710234e-8,0.0000016699013,0.0018969232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928707,0.00015884133,0.00008681348,0.0000486061,0.00024382108,0.00017486335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993584,0.00018737648,0.000102600556,0.00009026952,0.00012486686,0.0001364689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060418376,0.000036076668,0.000079865844,0.0000034921304,0.0011085212,0.000012155592,0.0003546777,0.0000621025,0.0003238453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073803785,0.000023200566,0.00007977545,0.000011844347,0.0015147105,0.0003335829,0.00004183281,0.000081457496,0.000004730028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034890967,0.000016998521,0.000059273243,0.0000024705068,0.000016856398,0.0000032745452,0.0025104226,9.648771e-8,0.00012714585,0.99584025,0.00011898103,0.001269346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041351802,0.00006277407,0.00050364446,0.000055341756,0.000018796341,0.000001671579,0.0021135672,5.4864887e-7,0.00023737586,0.25438058,0.74215513,0.000057026988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04168154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13749485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015465255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008120785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122179429","doi":"10.3138/utlj.11117-2","title":"CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND CONCEPTIONS OF PENALITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminal jurisdiction; German; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Universal jurisdiction; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03976751809362463,"score_gpt":0.31766872520294265,"score_spread":0.27790120710931804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122179429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84910184,0.00045089392,0.00018515046,0.00085845415,0.00005753101,0.00009350085,0.0000036685833,0.000004292601,0.1492447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897975,0.00031045818,0.0004964283,0.0000082824645,0.000030102528,4.7091422e-8,1.8782892e-7,8.045723e-7,0.00017395196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941057,0.00015612703,0.00009415337,0.00007291574,0.00016677486,0.00009948816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993766,0.000064620086,0.000116498144,0.000039084633,0.00032072773,0.0000824595],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025410153,0.000040495856,0.0001302142,0.000015718904,0.00039059666,0.000015636148,0.00010663243,0.00003574916,0.0013766511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017717106,0.000044521385,0.00004225025,0.000025553729,0.00070573925,0.00081842794,0.000023429126,0.00008805849,0.0000027830483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012259363,0.00015193215,0.008147328,0.000015627116,0.0000341627,0.000007656822,0.39339986,0.000017817547,0.00059776596,0.59551805,0.001063052,0.00092415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040772633,0.0001478086,0.16535202,0.000065757216,0.000048943573,0.0000075137477,0.8240432,0.00003714469,0.00004485733,0.003765956,0.005998656,0.00008038398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64015937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5205754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5917521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032104793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006693039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122274319","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.579","title":"GIVING VOICE TO REALITY: MICHAEL TREBILCOCK AND PENSION GOVERNANCE ISSUES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Moral hazard; Pension; Liability; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Commission; Business; Private pension; Economics; Actuarial science; Law; Finance; Sociology; Political science; Incentive; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.014998732713589107,"score_gpt":0.2777613802792982,"score_spread":0.2627626475657091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122274319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71908724,0.00041543558,0.00042048265,0.027460953,0.0002929936,0.00016924959,0.000027094486,0.000030942305,0.2520956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99174106,0.00054444605,0.0029691067,0.000081035025,0.00018705356,2.9223237e-8,2.7402814e-7,0.0000026165278,0.0044743945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994894,0.00003814988,0.000067314955,0.000097301025,0.00018215798,0.00012564947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995005,0.000035187153,0.00009054695,0.00009525902,0.000105378575,0.00017310973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030772088,0.000043869462,0.00008546342,0.00000507683,0.0009670455,0.000040613126,0.00021150072,0.00004791861,0.00041165182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000390325,0.000047629397,0.000035548695,0.000023953284,0.00015188353,0.00039427448,0.000078135316,0.00012308192,0.0000078910925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049053757,0.000085788524,0.0026628952,0.000011150033,0.000025570609,0.000013218261,0.039239734,0.0000090200765,0.010353945,0.9194992,0.011001898,0.017048504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012821412,0.000020202744,0.016008753,0.000014532813,0.000009613304,0.000004306902,0.0059453608,0.000015243656,0.000053850243,0.00051290705,0.9772239,0.00006314234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37742424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80637306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008899022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041814827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.743783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122295073","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.983","title":"IF PHILOSOPHICAL LEGAL ETHICS IS THE ANSWER, WHAT IS THE QUESTION?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Legal ethics; Law; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Principle of legality; Political science; Sociology; Meta-ethics; Normative ethics; Immorality; Information ethics; Legal profession; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03466443420024338,"score_gpt":0.35657622478657486,"score_spread":0.32191179058633146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122295073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053721596,0.00018277254,0.00010588348,0.82789695,0.0016937746,0.00007548088,0.0000043099326,0.000011718794,0.16465694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98267025,0.0015301756,0.0005553487,0.009864647,0.0010586751,8.070443e-8,8.1929596e-7,0.000003734774,0.004316289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988249,0.00038140596,0.00010825526,0.000083544815,0.00046509455,0.00013680974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984832,0.0004782936,0.00018404148,0.00017898732,0.0005797988,0.00009570175],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019794442,0.00005625309,0.00006624916,0.000011325754,0.0039493367,0.00042405335,0.00055444695,0.00014626894,0.0068360073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002816588,0.00004030677,0.00008644759,0.00008029445,0.0008481094,0.0029342985,0.000037178546,0.0016107996,0.000027210996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013209583,0.000045955796,0.00009804167,0.0000010004261,0.000024296705,0.0000018467038,0.0772221,6.8174296e-7,0.00002396141,0.90290445,0.018027838,0.0016365955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010693753,0.000015581223,0.00058783044,0.000010198667,0.000029637968,0.000011613118,0.06461013,0.000009207206,0.000010621332,0.011305857,0.9232509,0.000051479947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16658121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26161847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011113247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075197546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122401549","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0004","title":"From author’s right to property right","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Chicago; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Property rights; Statute; Property (philosophy); Exclusive right; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Right to property; Sociology; Intellectual property; Philosophy; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0151646453969118,"score_gpt":0.24738780700671692,"score_spread":0.2322231616098051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122401549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03130213,0.0011612229,0.00030088602,0.0057862643,0.0012766836,0.00014623988,0.000026714117,0.00004415939,0.9599557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93917215,0.00028828203,0.006251423,0.00034222723,0.0018685216,6.939678e-8,0.0000028488766,0.000006549394,0.052067928],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901384,0.0001600977,0.00008447063,0.000090164154,0.0003592961,0.00029213494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992376,0.000024406121,0.00008851217,0.000097786164,0.00013610467,0.00041557327],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004260886,0.000071866,0.00013010947,0.000002251771,0.001620124,0.000036959605,0.00039872582,0.00013166052,0.015532318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016511774,0.000052643933,0.00013512577,0.000035125293,0.00023032918,0.0009850598,0.000056998157,0.00014692197,0.00007302342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008674033,0.00027703113,0.0016309584,0.0000055288924,0.0001814344,0.00002810842,0.4280671,0.000004434949,0.0007454098,0.1831457,0.38283294,0.00299462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001886782,0.000020551472,0.00069468695,0.000019622497,0.00003484484,0.0000022354063,0.03883217,7.726913e-7,0.00012421049,0.00069101684,0.95929235,0.00009886211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13955218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16488709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90788776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004216087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006238591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122428845","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0008","title":"Animals accurs’d: &lt;i&gt;Ferae naturae&lt;/i&gt; and the law of property in nineteenth-century North America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Order (exchange); Settlement (finance); Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.005647770035188382,"score_gpt":0.18091042586277323,"score_spread":0.17526265582758485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122428845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44453463,0.022531576,0.000012978986,0.00457692,0.0005418699,0.00064940925,0.00005390653,0.000023851318,0.5270749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904722,0.006389104,0.00016032654,0.0001215583,0.00007860782,1.8615127e-7,0.0000012020437,0.0000045638117,0.0027722416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893296,0.00023398704,0.00016444852,0.00011950863,0.00032302854,0.00022606067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992366,0.00006754346,0.00022437742,0.000112948255,0.00017958083,0.00017893719],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029273704,0.000077476005,0.00023398822,0.000058433125,0.0011001368,0.000108843036,0.00039991454,0.0000704917,0.0018983776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036253343,0.00006630075,0.00010481616,0.00007435826,0.0022688836,0.00071929954,0.00006767451,0.00016729292,0.000008903001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008182242,0.0004251867,0.003872497,0.00010535308,0.0003701549,0.00012973591,0.2147303,0.000045548317,0.0018298059,0.62990886,0.10170185,0.046062518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008880957,0.00005141576,0.014959334,0.000032100925,0.000031464708,0.000004177777,0.0060186097,0.000012549782,0.0000011542671,0.000103833365,0.9777981,0.00009917108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8849808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99410325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87609625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065710966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022597334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122505542","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0004","title":"The Reasonable Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Frank Iacobucci's Career on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Voting; Political science","score_opus":0.025530191102306383,"score_gpt":0.2686493321745971,"score_spread":0.24311914107229068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122505542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51263344,0.0013709097,0.00033390685,0.0051540043,0.00037468906,0.00010339565,0.000051523923,0.0000056106733,0.47997254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993114,0.00027803014,0.000042159245,0.00007203808,0.00007734414,1.4536395e-8,5.5389756e-7,0.0000010081321,0.00021744691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988701,0.00011953459,0.00013216502,0.000063403444,0.00063776586,0.00017705918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988474,0.0003645072,0.00017201027,0.00008937306,0.00043510742,0.000091585236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010675107,0.000049200236,0.00016186736,0.0000140320335,0.0021773153,0.000008897855,0.00035312245,0.000036339763,0.00035958286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009284882,0.00003325001,0.00011246658,0.00011172634,0.0007438191,0.0001095064,0.000032682685,0.00009113644,1.8016883e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038001695,0.00014413527,0.02829002,0.0000045048123,0.0017211741,0.000029198645,0.015866807,0.00052628625,0.000043394684,0.93316,0.018532999,0.0013014595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041730123,0.00018571618,0.30234522,0.00003900276,0.0021560723,0.0000019018024,0.31469998,0.000110141766,0.00007693324,0.0015734526,0.37821853,0.00017575415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9698301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93158656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035695257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050778623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122585759","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.347","title":"Contracts to the Detriment of a Third Party: Developing a Model Inspired by Jewish Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Harm; Law; Judaism; Political science; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Israeli law; Common law; Business; Sociology; Municipal law; Chinese law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028397188368254146,"score_gpt":0.2643624809128136,"score_spread":0.23596529254455947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122585759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07778607,0.0019719638,0.0046126666,0.0026550747,0.0003640308,0.00020738665,0.000028793153,0.000018089013,0.9123559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958813,0.0002041205,0.0012432255,0.00085133064,0.00010362908,4.785274e-8,8.1134175e-7,0.0000037761183,0.0017117423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990584,0.00014044167,0.00014332023,0.000062781764,0.00037969893,0.00021534269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992663,0.00006697351,0.00018173148,0.000074400064,0.00023472097,0.00017587485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076546747,0.000060610004,0.00012235223,0.000010379953,0.0005946357,0.000028891707,0.0003985857,0.000037426507,0.00015535209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047541387,0.000053158125,0.00007872049,0.000027428725,0.00016805746,0.00072153844,0.000058328187,0.00009356023,0.000008790403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063186286,0.000077478275,0.00017452976,0.0000020274322,0.000063058804,0.0000021275262,0.010629225,0.00006214875,0.0006538912,0.9831145,0.004338803,0.000819062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003999082,0.000043991295,0.000520674,0.000041879302,0.000022740423,0.0000018017411,0.0026231955,0.00008823194,0.00054257264,0.0003075728,0.99531716,0.00009025551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023347385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069999374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99097836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032614483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001001227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9831562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122591002","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0011","title":"Democracy, Community, and Federalism in Electoral Apportionment Cases: The United States, Canada, and Australia in Comparative Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Democracy; Federalism; Individualism; Jurisprudence; Apportionment; Political science; Legislature; Separation of powers; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06483907648198886,"score_gpt":0.29210837386029515,"score_spread":0.22726929737830628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122591002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938523,0.00037132038,0.0000049631976,0.001566877,0.00003543863,0.000068684785,0.000009319543,0.0000017033,0.0040893583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989306,0.0008608958,0.000022122746,0.00006863127,0.000012562503,5.4738766e-8,0.0000015996791,6.247023e-7,0.00010295575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999283,0.0003032423,0.00007919136,0.000048948885,0.00016537214,0.00012020188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965173,0.000103392806,0.00006532107,0.000025583024,0.000094577124,0.000059387457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023588332,0.00004892616,0.00011232411,0.000015791165,0.0022888095,0.00001228765,0.0000889784,0.000021013298,0.000053764197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013632553,0.000044223776,0.000012745356,0.00004971025,0.00089655817,0.00016517795,0.000046130528,0.00018177289,1.1163442e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021127753,0.00018293415,0.45023268,0.000003805578,0.000115354414,0.0004882104,0.33024016,0.00025585643,0.000006666245,0.21423781,0.003963539,0.000061710474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046346197,0.000053248255,0.5913345,0.000021688464,0.0000108125305,0.00004589516,0.39669272,0.000014274991,0.0000011116905,0.0029351544,0.0083510615,0.00007601892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99976784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21130265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009090977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022466855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122742871","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.355","title":"ARGUMENTS OF VIRTUE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Constitutional interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02032845432850052,"score_gpt":0.23900120557065604,"score_spread":0.21867275124215552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122742871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41394642,0.002571082,0.0009996435,0.000554533,0.00023028997,0.00009385281,0.000022903576,0.00001106614,0.5815702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998205,0.0011384258,0.00039190546,0.000024883953,0.00006827533,1.7835857e-8,3.7596718e-7,5.488085e-7,0.00017058919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994978,0.00003231896,0.000075786,0.000056686287,0.00025194717,0.00008548242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996137,0.000022165614,0.000090889705,0.000020907848,0.00017713825,0.00007521751],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001158763,0.000039800812,0.00010340925,0.000009802338,0.0014399465,0.0000037736238,0.000094531395,0.000033022356,0.00028751738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024853058,0.000041791613,0.00004393624,0.000017698345,0.0056347,0.00027476207,0.000032049542,0.000050191302,0.0000013813044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047325495,0.000048752485,0.008516249,0.000004147697,0.000043521326,0.000022740334,0.004546189,0.0000030329054,0.00006122768,0.9860363,0.00043024134,0.00024027421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052543636,0.0007311646,0.23133087,0.0004887876,0.0005362848,0.00080525817,0.2117968,0.000019817278,0.00035565867,0.044908408,0.50295925,0.0008133111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03698629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029259836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9411279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010003878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026266446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122872171","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0009","title":"Law-Making in Small Jurisdictions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Simple (philosophy); Faith; Legal culture; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0167603221118748,"score_gpt":0.1801361238520556,"score_spread":0.1633758017401808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122872171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06753328,0.0016099935,0.0018445723,0.00015152282,0.00057550054,0.00007109164,0.00004594344,0.000014222365,0.9281539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983942,0.00017890382,0.0006382426,0.00005093049,0.00025257355,6.831906e-8,0.0000023635944,0.00000822146,0.00047449573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921185,0.000017257744,0.00039117568,0.00015755618,0.000019037485,0.00020310194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937826,0.000019461702,0.00039368923,0.00012741284,0.000028099555,0.000053058706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034572947,0.00007084171,0.00030487136,0.00005083413,0.00029788402,0.00003906168,0.00021996886,0.00008705803,0.0007621557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000040805558,0.00011751253,0.000139396,0.000028215321,0.00013078157,0.00044329994,0.000038099854,0.000114544055,0.00005433852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016193644,0.00006538226,0.019745987,0.0000061524897,0.000024205305,0.000015100477,0.00057996693,0.00025227288,0.000005076835,0.9787804,0.0004108202,0.0000984677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023902282,0.00012527328,0.050382327,0.000100762474,0.000020380061,0.000055458782,0.0017036893,0.00081504864,0.000017283613,0.22518334,0.7187268,0.0004794214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3226725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6050511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93086094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054893695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014943996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83450705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122972675","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0007","title":"The Vertical Restraints Paradox: Justifying the Different Legal Treatment of Price and Non-Price Vertical Restraints","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031081620689989327,"score_gpt":0.20533742162380983,"score_spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122972675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94513947,0.003994189,0.0006191435,0.0017812864,0.00020701921,0.00010245022,0.000022537766,0.0000047263993,0.048129197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951524,0.004421279,0.0000887999,0.000022656228,0.000060625,1.9329376e-7,4.7562702e-7,0.0000027853816,0.0002507517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993417,0.00002293456,0.00023514156,0.00013083052,0.000079142585,0.00019019487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995162,0.00013446719,0.000090389265,0.00012157361,0.000046529596,0.0000908549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013028023,0.000096885255,0.00023135472,0.000011702263,0.0011204645,0.000022878114,0.00019198161,0.0000423299,0.00009050039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003431612,0.00006519156,0.00011561211,0.000022924882,0.0008112448,0.00018646638,0.0000649777,0.00010081234,0.0000063473703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004549651,0.00039632764,0.023949893,0.000015795642,0.0004957204,0.0001270537,0.0038801667,0.00003377433,0.00007470299,0.96847755,0.00050306314,0.0015909867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023596047,0.0005802511,0.87130123,0.00004173366,0.000081481274,0.0002540727,0.002577555,0.00049152056,0.00011136212,0.0032795225,0.118687175,0.00023451664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072784787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030417237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96519804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026112105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034701225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123075200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.137","title":"STRUCTURAL JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE OBJECTION FROM DEMOCRACY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Enforcement; Democracy; Legislation; Federalism; Politics; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009126243226453234,"score_gpt":0.2355373833031734,"score_spread":0.22641114007672017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123075200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23796473,0.04086637,0.00010025642,0.029756572,0.0020430686,0.00032189288,0.000024906889,0.000030552637,0.68889165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873513,0.011848158,0.00014181543,0.00022178225,0.0003583848,1.9320684e-8,4.0676733e-7,7.7209313e-7,0.00007734646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956197,0.000086085594,0.00006344395,0.00005230737,0.00015837135,0.00007780123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965036,0.00006694141,0.0000901047,0.000033983786,0.0001085487,0.000050082195],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027867165,0.000036741112,0.000116383926,0.0000031348502,0.0024728798,0.000016933063,0.00013026987,0.00003030246,0.0011710058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006236872,0.000027639067,0.000055714263,0.000016421425,0.0012439843,0.0002655469,0.000037128866,0.0001328313,0.0000021030512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007889676,0.0000073571296,0.0016141698,0.0000041074045,0.000082581784,0.0000044796675,0.005087558,2.8257173e-7,0.000036527166,0.9827385,0.0018495151,0.008496036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026379386,0.00005461394,0.09475372,0.00021860625,0.00086914253,0.000038384467,0.025381647,0.000010635448,0.000008912411,0.28200775,0.5937246,0.00029403623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53904855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7205359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74938655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046069836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006109461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123233902","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0020","title":"Property and Collective Undertaking: The Principle of Numerus Clausus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private property; Property rights; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Converse; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.07993937749254479,"score_gpt":0.2821336073769927,"score_spread":0.20219422988444793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123233902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026250802,0.00018070498,0.00012435703,0.00072576635,0.000086293054,0.000076107775,0.0000031530897,0.0000056669187,0.9725472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801874,0.00013529418,0.00027604305,0.000047993373,0.0000445445,1.6448098e-8,4.9662276e-8,0.0000016603232,0.0014756508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939287,0.00016741123,0.000071202856,0.00005576509,0.00018165253,0.00013112865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950546,0.0000819535,0.00009788649,0.00006016458,0.00015335808,0.00010119976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041323638,0.000038881048,0.00009140953,0.0000065780223,0.00093449553,0.000008065147,0.00020781354,0.00006479968,0.00039424698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006682325,0.000026012229,0.00004684617,0.000024463465,0.00104935,0.00022510988,0.000047398415,0.00013894221,8.1446e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007587252,0.000043751974,0.0006319608,0.000004794948,0.00003719118,0.000004890453,0.043938592,3.36117e-7,0.000011201398,0.95494384,0.00007186997,0.00023571223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015177693,0.0006504353,0.03327508,0.00012515154,0.00021145088,0.000028144043,0.09023282,0.000038449205,0.0003325888,0.6363831,0.23689815,0.0003068325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094521485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08026902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97176796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017161443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019697667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93651366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123294711","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0021","title":"Electoral fairness and the law of democracy: A structural rights approach to judicial review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015573670904401118,"score_gpt":0.25021697575501783,"score_spread":0.2346433048506167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123294711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079061344,0.050368816,0.00045392636,0.00449815,0.0005571807,0.0005065494,0.00001647066,0.000017228576,0.8645203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799585,0.0011771852,0.00036896556,0.00017151482,0.00023715849,7.344939e-8,3.731221e-7,0.000001116338,0.000047771322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991934,0.00017516651,0.00010993489,0.000059797156,0.00028556728,0.0001761572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995117,0.000049378483,0.000121545985,0.000045234032,0.00015407067,0.00011806155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052184856,0.000059295424,0.00022153916,0.0000063317666,0.0018057559,0.000010070109,0.00020131226,0.000030594423,0.00012845412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024001261,0.000042100994,0.00008370117,0.000042190262,0.0013016535,0.00037661553,0.00006537471,0.00007639093,0.0000011470114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007290074,0.000017188255,0.00077918277,0.00001192951,0.00004808614,5.681126e-7,0.005046377,5.7397506e-7,0.0000039123083,0.9930567,0.0005466949,0.00041590162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004577926,0.00022865091,0.041691095,0.00111477,0.0012080101,0.00011604409,0.035270594,0.000014645589,0.000061649356,0.16325527,0.7516763,0.00078501255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.362905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21997476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9189345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010376791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049455477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123302563","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.073","title":"CHARITIES AND TERRORIST FINANCING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legitimacy; Transparency (behavior); Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Militant; Political science; Finance; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.023341868083039504,"score_gpt":0.22370790941972915,"score_spread":0.20036604133668964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123302563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6063091,0.005383792,0.0003320142,0.000227813,0.00037549745,0.000053126772,0.0000017682142,0.000018889856,0.38729796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98379105,0.012868033,0.0027589754,0.000034753535,0.00006098492,1.1236904e-8,1.3884578e-7,0.000001570675,0.00048449164],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995897,0.000037553746,0.00005909942,0.00005613986,0.00013978394,0.00011776544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972737,0.000011848401,0.00006707937,0.00003464611,0.00007120095,0.00008784458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002612592,0.00003743724,0.000075800184,0.0000061464716,0.0009547555,0.00001622353,0.00012087222,0.000042806467,0.00046131125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000073849924,0.00004101678,0.000042841064,0.000011157076,0.00027503178,0.00033923227,0.000029558123,0.000050707964,0.0000017646071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018430912,0.000024943907,0.0032037247,0.0000068807535,0.00002582005,0.000018310595,0.9459077,1.0783486e-7,0.000013127491,0.03943734,0.010538946,0.0008046279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035411757,0.000054001343,0.06198852,0.000045100547,0.0000197372,0.0000104178325,0.8098364,0.0000017917516,0.000029553148,0.0044607553,0.12307757,0.00012206725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51937217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18083954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38681346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016155916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007463054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.834108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123575200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0077","title":"Criminal law and the constitution of civil order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Polity; Politics; Comparative law; Constitution; Morality; Private law; Jurisdiction; Sociology","score_opus":0.02207173704490226,"score_gpt":0.20137159426822976,"score_spread":0.1792998572233275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123575200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11080712,0.0008956125,0.0028896257,0.0039861873,0.00026175956,0.00014183462,0.000024262778,0.000018769686,0.8809748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989553,0.0002491885,0.00018221498,0.0005245214,0.000032304077,6.600787e-9,9.958662e-8,0.0000011031896,0.000055239692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957454,0.000072775554,0.00007441704,0.000074328695,0.0001339178,0.00006999953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996903,0.000048438556,0.00009636857,0.00004977013,0.000050239232,0.00006488597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000806599,0.00004278109,0.0000995026,0.0000034922914,0.000311573,0.000009932558,0.000166523,0.000020093978,0.00054115633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046523095,0.000032135988,0.000044687593,0.000020365298,0.0010108106,0.00027261913,0.00005705424,0.00007896285,0.0000018712061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030038808,0.000026836446,0.000052570485,0.000020574063,0.000009080004,0.00003847845,0.003208506,0.000029975623,0.016592765,0.97867966,0.0005588789,0.0004822843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02768072,0.0019442263,0.0034436476,0.00037448568,0.0009239953,0.0014053654,0.032295924,0.0059010857,0.07901885,0.012056549,0.83396965,0.0009854647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066876286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011810088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017511775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002447756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123793227","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2037","title":"How tort law empowers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Delict; Redress; Political science; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Scrutiny; Sociology; Law and economics; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.011350819186203726,"score_gpt":0.2362524998717011,"score_spread":0.22490168068549737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123793227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008035085,0.000079654405,0.0021045934,0.0045976243,0.00014316503,0.00004930844,0.000003780169,0.000019483163,0.9849673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277323,0.00009491751,0.0011830977,0.00010286351,0.00018917344,1.8730168e-8,5.3391904e-7,0.0000023869666,0.005653793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947745,0.00006628759,0.000048134367,0.00006952751,0.00020314929,0.0001354558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955136,0.00002657291,0.000086975495,0.00009062609,0.00009728439,0.00014719015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028597316,0.0000399483,0.00007852574,0.0000047049784,0.0011891088,0.00006667153,0.00029254035,0.00004509457,0.00053881115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011841144,0.000043464126,0.00007809708,0.000016325273,0.0002889488,0.0005288879,0.00003464035,0.00007448999,0.000007476776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005575845,0.000018816054,0.00012916235,0.0000011417203,0.000010838704,0.000001461224,0.003022961,0.0000026813982,0.000057975252,0.99351156,0.0018238218,0.0014140309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016892541,0.000022985567,0.00036881724,0.0000053482254,0.000012355783,0.0000014387201,0.00939275,0.000008706947,0.000016329835,0.0013208314,0.98862755,0.000053967153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15809794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4663198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018457547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000418324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9145784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123918208","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.213","title":"FORMALISM IN MUSIC AND LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Epistemology; Law; Theoretical physics; Philosophy; Political science; Physics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.022847260544907672,"score_gpt":0.21664331691128785,"score_spread":0.19379605636638017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123918208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07495367,0.0005928832,0.000014244626,0.00016082286,0.000117869255,0.000036555575,0.0000017579428,0.000007715024,0.92411447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683917,0.0009550469,0.0010098813,0.00012954342,0.000057901878,1.083626e-8,1.9696887e-7,0.0000014606925,0.0010067843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958855,0.000058970913,0.000052560616,0.000050906594,0.00012367085,0.00012531721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997668,0.000009360894,0.00005466482,0.000037017977,0.00004796873,0.000084131774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002668783,0.00003535707,0.00007334769,0.0000015179717,0.00065078103,0.000012468148,0.00015186584,0.00007592243,0.0017722978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003315247,0.000036096317,0.000046700425,0.000016602015,0.0004119305,0.00068533124,0.000030308947,0.00009347303,0.0000016893889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001721727,0.00002762688,0.0006101557,0.0000027232268,0.0000110098545,0.000017660535,0.20588306,1.8701144e-7,0.000011999164,0.7918198,0.0009843444,0.0006142294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007794663,0.000057842753,0.005327535,0.000036294805,0.00002453923,0.000012286986,0.24930422,0.0000024979322,0.000024558816,0.012171743,0.7321342,0.000124792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24027735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75441426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9231077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107434775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002345633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123947670","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0007","title":"Promoting Consensus in Society through Deferred-Implementation Agreements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08851777018322296,"score_gpt":0.3615972571401677,"score_spread":0.27307948695694473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123947670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9009696,0.0009463275,0.010615339,0.00028526777,0.0004287846,0.00023466018,0.000019696674,0.000017277931,0.086482994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99180186,0.0000064704063,0.0075643836,0.000029878272,0.00006739777,3.539765e-8,8.868262e-7,0.0000036366,0.0005254647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778855,0.00018306564,0.00057420676,0.00021822854,0.0010239952,0.0002119841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985921,0.0002602549,0.0005886572,0.00018857735,0.00031775684,0.000052701947],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015497854,0.00009115388,0.00024050404,0.000032957596,0.0004542956,0.000117152726,0.00041782422,0.000046836016,0.0019178296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045107783,0.000084658626,0.00020348238,0.00011298208,0.000080376594,0.00054638385,0.00013559258,0.00010115792,0.00001559225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046376837,0.0008158257,0.28349954,0.000041307358,0.00022844608,0.0005626241,0.085149325,0.0023783564,0.0058857887,0.2226951,0.2861977,0.112082236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008427562,0.00032241916,0.2230548,0.00024404621,0.000055843437,0.00030423843,0.21225323,0.007802272,0.00028085196,0.14181587,0.40480325,0.0006356224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067672774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22207531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15440254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030386742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005399597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124106265","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4005","title":"Law in the future","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020695685114375972,"score_gpt":0.2727627974300204,"score_spread":0.25206711231564444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124106265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029008485,0.00040642318,0.00057899865,0.012642928,0.00061712344,0.00009796279,0.000004144183,0.000014248576,0.9566297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802804,0.00046972002,0.00023185027,0.00018415677,0.0004074017,1.8250828e-8,6.144438e-8,0.0000018965325,0.00067682733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915534,0.0002402496,0.00008556914,0.000065677494,0.00028135965,0.00017178156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995666,0.00011392871,0.000077908764,0.00009551217,0.00008438151,0.000061624625],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007275709,0.000041977484,0.000073190655,0.0000072773146,0.00080544915,0.000024010771,0.0005510423,0.00006210016,0.0026895634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017278615,0.000027445934,0.00006605286,0.00002977086,0.0006812678,0.0006442227,0.00002522748,0.00008480702,0.000026283313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020633235,0.000025587113,0.000346162,5.2201443e-7,0.0000047258104,0.000023864157,0.022102652,9.429542e-7,0.000062706284,0.9661671,0.0012997774,0.00994535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008867915,0.000028040935,0.0003672492,0.000020082702,0.0000058333526,0.0000040410214,0.08532566,6.3925506e-7,0.000044820226,0.0086453855,0.9054199,0.000049668277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1598708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9049312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002598896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048719754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124226099","doi":"10.2307/3650880","title":"Venture-Capital Exits in Canada and the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Venture capital; Capital (architecture); Business; Political science; Finance; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006414240146212012,"score_gpt":0.15792462023382542,"score_spread":0.15151038008761342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124226099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791747,0.000870019,0.00004119012,0.0005650998,0.00024613,0.00006418017,0.0000022920228,0.00000467475,0.019031756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991642,0.0002608323,0.00003080646,0.0004130278,0.00006208517,2.3412458e-8,0.000005115875,0.000003337915,0.00006055683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995204,0.000026941416,0.00009325856,0.00006930988,0.000145562,0.00014451973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969625,0.0000335588,0.00012253631,0.000066826084,0.0000635769,0.000017257013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024524867,0.00007027565,0.000119701515,0.00002604071,0.00022478611,0.00004797121,0.000175186,0.00002365497,0.00043700228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026208028,0.000057762885,0.00003448263,0.00004874587,0.00010763978,0.00061467115,0.000067469075,0.00012732623,0.0000018117478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042898124,0.00008030829,0.026150666,0.00006650914,0.00011746496,0.00024769042,0.0019769063,0.00042953342,0.000021402793,0.96273065,0.0068946104,0.00085530843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009967518,0.00003230659,0.053783994,0.0001364333,0.00014599794,0.000073064904,0.048138004,0.0016339219,0.000022294204,0.021182973,0.86442643,0.00045704233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94154763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019290183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006232307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47848684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124279764","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.525","title":"POPULARITY AS A FACTOR IN COPYRIGHT LAW","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Argument (complex analysis); Scope (computer science); Premise; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014954926124756941,"score_gpt":0.20127871215037754,"score_spread":0.1863237860256206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124279764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14050594,0.0002569736,0.000077269164,0.00063846336,0.00019368753,0.000082746796,0.0000013852765,0.000028304337,0.8582152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770516,0.000038556143,0.000101997255,0.000897807,0.00023046517,1.13071055e-8,0.0000024416515,0.0000045889346,0.0010189991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929243,0.000013977532,0.000151175,0.00013197448,0.00020632171,0.00020414683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995667,0.000010318928,0.00013389396,0.00011526715,0.00014782656,0.000026024481],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013527497,0.00011140409,0.00019490061,0.000043602184,0.00035485678,0.000109831795,0.00032641646,0.00007006807,0.018894052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018338187,0.000099176315,0.00011404782,0.000055662265,0.00007522149,0.002422183,0.0000636205,0.0001894001,0.00011349672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016883325,0.00095311727,0.0043404563,0.000087385466,0.00012858286,0.0006332225,0.003218731,0.000013081812,0.0025262951,0.86559296,0.099972285,0.02084555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016001861,0.00012696226,0.010160712,0.000098749195,0.000042162414,0.000023022378,0.001172631,0.0013250954,0.00016499401,0.0146827875,0.97027725,0.00032544226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15268888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1560472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87030494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016729455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016408849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124331650","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0037","title":"'Necessity knows no law': On extreme cases and uncodifiable necessities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontological ethics; Dignity; Normative; Torture; Context (archaeology); Consequentialism; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Human rights; History","score_opus":0.07944835856887593,"score_gpt":0.25887220525571875,"score_spread":0.1794238466868428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124331650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051945053,0.0009966736,0.000027488519,0.00019264143,0.00048199072,0.00005890076,0.000012622192,0.000029987046,0.9462547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99071974,0.0010598283,0.00084627996,0.00019804695,0.00025165238,3.2356347e-8,8.524433e-7,0.0000056568624,0.0069179363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894774,0.00021502891,0.000112746,0.00014705697,0.00032910617,0.00024829726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911135,0.00015509657,0.00016983776,0.00011683879,0.0002103484,0.00023650787],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000478545,0.00010215425,0.00018755367,0.000015496096,0.0019130304,0.000053058884,0.00030081364,0.00014478537,0.0039256006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054028867,0.000104841936,0.0000817203,0.000019870578,0.0010648709,0.00089567754,0.000057241698,0.00022664118,0.000011667905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002465463,0.00014737765,0.0020509441,0.000019826266,0.000059774822,0.0001721112,0.045106683,0.0000016242639,0.000033081036,0.9461596,0.004358854,0.001643569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006613561,0.00030439848,0.0033890083,0.0001237099,0.000067228655,0.000021535085,0.05365008,0.00000610174,0.0000724347,0.0024525665,0.9389968,0.00025476105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53561604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79147214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94370705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020617298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011341003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124412607","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0052","title":"Ideas, interests, institutions and the history of Canadian bankruptcy law, 1867-1880","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislation; Scholarship; Law; Creditor; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Repeal; State (computer science); Sociology; Economics; Law and economics; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.01370690613942484,"score_gpt":0.19978170140996168,"score_spread":0.18607479527053683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124412607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016585523,0.0023475601,0.000011219314,0.0019806502,0.0015677308,0.00007004743,0.000024273233,0.0000060978346,0.9774069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848853,0.0011485348,0.00016940164,0.00017027512,0.00012729489,3.5469043e-8,8.155682e-7,0.00000275538,0.013495629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994708,0.00008748522,0.00008912148,0.00006343926,0.0001495192,0.0001396843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933195,0.00003449193,0.0001075064,0.00010091986,0.0001245586,0.0003005516],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041545913,0.00004080043,0.00011098779,0.00011966775,0.0015552721,0.000040020266,0.00030545658,0.00007157094,0.0028336884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044806082,0.000046813766,0.00007835752,0.000035847013,0.004428933,0.00043653275,0.000024217801,0.00020682733,0.000003974592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017626964,0.00000874291,0.000055836957,0.0000032833439,0.00001925088,0.000013435079,0.021544347,5.758166e-7,0.000020481879,0.9480212,0.029516784,0.0007784751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037794423,0.0000094703955,0.0007575986,0.0000125881415,0.000032503922,0.000010109722,0.006232103,0.0000016056756,2.9403776e-7,0.0006491488,0.9918671,0.00004948385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96829975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020392062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022890158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125005679","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0001","title":"Shareholder Isolation and the Regulation of Auditors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Accounting; Corporation; Business; Audit; Auditor's report; Auditor independence; Shareholder resolution; Corporate governance; Finance; Joint audit; Internal audit","score_opus":0.005617768537583901,"score_gpt":0.16837619700195125,"score_spread":0.16275842846436736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125005679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5450818,0.00061710336,0.271194,0.0038211935,0.000772234,0.00041035467,0.0000044389794,0.00005653509,0.17804232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987583,0.000052016872,0.0005006377,0.00008095757,0.00031671434,2.7827598e-8,0.0000016748054,0.0000046372666,0.0002850345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950594,0.000009760326,0.0001184041,0.00007805989,0.0002056329,0.000082224156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954425,0.000017188437,0.004320742,0.00008066442,0.00013190733,0.000006992287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002804313,0.000060163806,0.00010999678,0.000022069302,0.00031479387,0.000042098058,0.00015486081,0.000026864567,0.00046210497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018707603,0.00005316903,0.000055612072,0.00003986436,0.00015616232,0.0013771994,0.00010365645,0.00007172168,0.000005116223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055868906,0.00009549326,0.010334586,0.00018588286,0.00019451801,0.000009352415,0.0024893675,0.007445361,0.00082515366,0.92950314,0.006151964,0.042206507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010580333,0.000049440445,0.55432576,0.0004268183,0.00036266632,0.000012665045,0.00555717,0.0024735366,0.00007838207,0.02160989,0.40416518,0.0003581637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021813521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008795839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90789324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008053054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007793327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125175680","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.537","title":"LEGAL UNIVERSALISM: PERSISTENT OBJECTIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Rehearsing; Political science; Law; Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.011754322329900426,"score_gpt":0.17276611680309018,"score_spread":0.16101179447318975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125175680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15888195,0.00028558527,0.0012707826,0.00032065995,0.0012881884,0.00004162191,0.00008147369,0.00001757702,0.8378122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943828,0.00014220826,0.0012319089,0.000041051746,0.00011571504,2.3665596e-8,0.0000025137333,0.0000044935264,0.0040792786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995374,0.00001016627,0.00017106897,0.00012656162,0.00001729176,0.00013747519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994565,0.000014013254,0.00020983923,0.00016169433,0.00004194584,0.00011596124],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023363007,0.0000677746,0.00016596136,0.000040464198,0.0006418595,0.000030956573,0.0002549983,0.00007429111,0.007868419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012752406,0.000093024806,0.00023749276,0.000022227423,0.00023029158,0.0009348095,0.00003974344,0.00023136732,0.00012269088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017512586,0.000052654537,0.00050889817,0.0000020192817,0.000070955124,0.000007924266,0.00061470584,0.00007605082,0.00009305541,0.9976995,0.0007526774,0.00010402119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064112747,0.00007681412,0.0013415847,0.0000060031434,0.000021594611,0.0001320763,0.0036297028,0.00019310319,0.000027396633,0.0076113767,0.9861709,0.00014834142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02465313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050485965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99008816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001994629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032612905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99303854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125339624","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.397","title":"THE EVIDENTIARY BURDEN FOR OVERTURNING GOVERNMENT'S CHOICE OF REGULATORY INSTRUMENT: THE CASE OF DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Charter; Argument (complex analysis); Consumer protection; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Public relations; Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.10390471592628747,"score_gpt":0.4148161472062495,"score_spread":0.310911431279962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125339624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99012816,0.001627943,0.000043505657,0.0009660109,0.0008906186,0.00036338912,0.00012678548,0.000005934708,0.0058476287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880683,0.0003946268,0.00015661739,0.000111884336,0.00014484787,4.9489256e-7,0.0000010401891,0.000007161721,0.00037647953],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987011,0.0003579865,0.00036263117,0.00012023786,0.00022268514,0.00023534131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979385,0.0008763411,0.00054495106,0.00018864876,0.00025384704,0.00019772064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012538225,0.000109145745,0.00023411255,0.000014703688,0.00079369644,0.0000078424955,0.000392708,0.00021753761,0.00040790666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014634554,0.000086692926,0.00016658641,0.000039557584,0.00048740226,0.00031122763,0.00012206238,0.00073152373,4.606286e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009355072,0.00081470615,0.022760931,0.0011554917,0.0027880508,0.00013041479,0.027095957,0.0009836961,0.6288691,0.036393598,0.012461508,0.25719148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056140106,0.0005656324,0.012432594,0.00040925218,0.0016271465,0.00032165615,0.021984126,0.003971249,0.19758917,0.00040847913,0.754702,0.00037468204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006069853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077160965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7422405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014483494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008404951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91758424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125346337","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.691","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE BALANCE: MODERN EXCLUSIONARY RULES AND THE TOLERATION OF POLICE LAWLESSNESS IN THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawlessness; Exclusionary rule; Discretion; Law; Political science; Balance (ability); Human rights; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.03770498597795385,"score_gpt":0.2871670229026199,"score_spread":0.24946203692466606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125346337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72354436,0.00046436637,0.00026055597,0.002663755,0.00009167125,0.00026360402,0.000029249639,0.0000025281606,0.27267992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995389,0.00011796396,0.00013932039,0.00006486858,0.000085361906,1.8436641e-7,8.8323776e-7,4.5161187e-7,0.000052084106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919903,0.0003679199,0.000079025485,0.00004566282,0.00021231061,0.00009602437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995082,0.00029661166,0.000057011108,0.000050299528,0.00006819628,0.000019660883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010436914,0.000035074565,0.000083790765,0.000009429803,0.00076035364,0.000017147997,0.0003108208,0.00003421986,0.00006390945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009203571,0.00001858529,0.000036244903,0.000025179874,0.0012270088,0.0002953136,0.000023526289,0.00008110332,2.6088583e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012481955,0.0000313432,0.00059744285,0.0000029632042,0.0000044070257,0.0000014492462,0.24953017,0.000007110937,0.000002694811,0.7495066,0.000044845274,0.0001461454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008537235,0.0002588754,0.09990769,0.00022876465,0.00010087613,0.00006343186,0.52291876,0.0020192594,0.000101672704,0.23451659,0.13102803,0.00031882976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44088218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48728222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51499003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046107678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007070646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5848102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125353358","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.445","title":"PERSON, PLACE, OR THING? PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURING OF SOCIAL RELATIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Structuring; Property rights; Epistemology; Intuition; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013791017483509402,"score_gpt":0.22701702171855773,"score_spread":0.21322600423504834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125353358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3243057,0.00018940943,0.00006351895,0.007866417,0.00032791833,0.00020197313,0.000008463411,0.000018057657,0.66701853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864755,0.000064644046,0.00056028046,0.00002003473,0.00014484486,1.7401836e-8,1.6431586e-7,0.0000019812082,0.012732504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947053,0.000107733635,0.000073089286,0.00005604725,0.00019158663,0.000100999474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960655,0.000051123814,0.00012563956,0.00004616974,0.00011427538,0.000056257733],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004928429,0.00004210648,0.00011044895,0.000008759269,0.0019277459,0.00003276326,0.00021343339,0.00005631148,0.0021640125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043622746,0.00002018,0.00005602158,0.000020809966,0.00092644605,0.0004662713,0.00003176532,0.00021217142,6.8936583e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064558676,0.000033880853,0.00047469308,0.000009609232,0.000081614766,0.0000094221605,0.19118527,0.0000026546425,0.00033990393,0.79988897,0.0023785785,0.004949788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00236753,0.000068990936,0.0053996393,0.000020818257,0.00008110094,0.000023056728,0.054925274,0.00013247451,0.00003569349,0.00091077486,0.93591833,0.0001163241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1296217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40852278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93353975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050648443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115584924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125541929","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0007","title":"A Network Effects Perspective on Software Piracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Business; Intellectual property; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Legislature; Software; Computer security; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.00991715124233946,"score_gpt":0.1909535129673466,"score_spread":0.18103636172500714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125541929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015087515,0.0010593064,0.0017837228,0.0011124586,0.00045933586,0.00015032424,7.464897e-7,0.00007742298,0.9802692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323905,0.000044747387,0.0011955706,0.0014578379,0.0022636028,4.2959332e-8,0.000001092064,0.000010956402,0.0017870772],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993579,0.000014762862,0.0000909213,0.00013540934,0.00019272392,0.0002083231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994042,0.00004462619,0.00014210037,0.000111040674,0.00027522873,0.000022832031],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001403931,0.00011261966,0.0001604051,0.000029053957,0.0006047029,0.0000858411,0.00026701327,0.00004853618,0.007925597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006079929,0.000098848264,0.0001268822,0.000047959045,0.00007307303,0.0016683446,0.00009651201,0.00016942553,0.00024813318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001332113,0.00043423942,0.0005911634,0.00007529268,0.00022913098,0.00010871887,0.0020083378,0.0005367364,0.000089186055,0.18221526,0.7648747,0.047505144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012916063,0.00014851568,0.0016683394,0.00016376983,0.0000997661,0.000010858344,0.0015423513,0.002630128,0.000035197452,0.003438632,0.98871064,0.00026021557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017673489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022235308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97848207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034887317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016281885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99560636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125656850","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.373","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND BEYOND","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Tribunal; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Work (physics); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.018811540854771994,"score_gpt":0.2066464900329916,"score_spread":0.1878349491782196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125656850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30869237,0.00055135676,0.0013012867,0.0007731994,0.0017743014,0.000105772706,0.00006775283,0.000011389918,0.6867226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976995,0.00028363237,0.0010265473,0.0002678969,0.00029929934,4.8166e-8,8.495213e-7,0.0000072086027,0.00041501375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942505,0.0000074235168,0.00022556106,0.00016091803,0.000022952554,0.00015809141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933136,0.000022501,0.00025973163,0.00013741835,0.000043538817,0.0002054616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033895785,0.00006325192,0.00025506178,0.000036288366,0.00032346926,0.00009337483,0.0003332894,0.0000768945,0.0014197528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002304807,0.00009793517,0.00006544937,0.000018828787,0.00011735728,0.0007985662,0.00010729328,0.0001262725,0.000056999874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044511842,0.000042123407,0.012938011,0.000023839306,0.000059424812,0.000010104652,0.0016843138,0.000013076053,0.00008437339,0.97903585,0.004829281,0.0012351121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018335372,0.00022521953,0.05680395,0.000025744932,0.000077850484,0.00009600597,0.0030033896,0.00028010152,0.000073300056,0.05954985,0.8774897,0.0005413377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030652719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09361914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.919486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009386681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013251764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125752786","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.229","title":"Corrective Justice and Unjust Enrichment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Private law; Economic Justice; Tort; Law; Duty; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Restitution; Liability","score_opus":0.01763466405302733,"score_gpt":0.27011748703015,"score_spread":0.25248282297712266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125752786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054830313,0.001121465,0.0017056318,0.0008418961,0.00037258194,0.00008131866,0.000006579898,0.000013691005,0.9410265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697775,0.00059560844,0.0007750092,0.00003841844,0.00018674371,2.1970317e-8,2.3738131e-7,0.000001303339,0.0014249046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996206,0.00004831828,0.000041365296,0.000040950308,0.00012059433,0.00012816474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963087,0.000037997386,0.00006453392,0.000038888935,0.00006631505,0.00016140335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024105779,0.0000300183,0.000053164385,0.000004856451,0.0009829703,0.000015267462,0.000099706114,0.00002799797,0.00057966233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010370704,0.000032175118,0.000026052658,0.000015401207,0.00016059449,0.0005884236,0.00003511753,0.000060543898,0.0000060907687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016459182,0.00008648548,0.0016319548,0.000004943862,0.000024062258,0.0000014574413,0.042845614,0.000003003039,0.000058201393,0.9485249,0.0022156618,0.0045872703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021529505,0.000024646812,0.011087842,0.000007365134,0.000105281906,0.0000055670394,0.09071607,0.0000074461877,0.000011185901,0.00030336482,0.8974518,0.00006410703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07064777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059177373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9482215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021391867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032610405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95799017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125754116","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4006","title":"Self-driving laws","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self driving; Computer science; State (computer science); Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.01632854652933821,"score_gpt":0.2709001571330333,"score_spread":0.25457161060369504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125754116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036224995,0.00019656925,0.00046443383,0.008339616,0.00035598577,0.00004955824,0.000003156356,0.000045253037,0.95432043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99253106,0.0020882834,0.0020017752,0.0000803226,0.00024292727,4.7553046e-9,5.795787e-8,0.0000033679123,0.003052196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992315,0.00014131353,0.00006988561,0.00006337696,0.0002960163,0.00019786907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922395,0.00012144833,0.00011373226,0.00006379537,0.00027418972,0.00020291048],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007120615,0.000044472068,0.00009733969,0.000008754264,0.0013514471,0.00004359491,0.00028941373,0.00009460706,0.001655415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009989028,0.000038290545,0.000092936905,0.000016546894,0.0003114917,0.0011114172,0.00003961202,0.000090172216,0.000012803999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016922075,0.00006623604,0.002586035,0.0000040677282,0.00007443662,0.00003016353,0.044739142,2.975131e-7,0.00032536988,0.9392454,0.0039215973,0.008990307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047206832,0.00006351708,0.0022020934,0.000058832953,0.000026128,0.0000027407816,0.018871937,0.0000011402104,0.00003059919,0.008579608,0.9695809,0.00011042161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06959414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44943213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041288446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016230502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125754435","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.481","title":"AN OBJECT LESSON IN SPECULATION: MULTIPLE VIEWS OF THE CATHEDRAL IN <i>LEAF V. INTERNATIONAL GALLERIES</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Painting; Law; Doctrine; Appeal; Damages; Speculation; Rescission; Verisimilitude; Art; Art history; Political science; Literature; Economics","score_opus":0.03133497533826046,"score_gpt":0.2749085395805675,"score_spread":0.24357356424230703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125754435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.877229,0.000075394935,0.00014404861,0.0012041259,0.00012860695,0.00010918251,0.000008839682,0.0000042649103,0.12109658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884975,0.00022946045,0.00051244214,0.000024391546,0.000061351646,6.989453e-8,0.0000010405734,0.0000017488331,0.0003197598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939257,0.000106088024,0.00012764709,0.0000679177,0.00021666526,0.00008911848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996332,0.00002321976,0.00013676487,0.000092241025,0.00007351689,0.000041059102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002480672,0.00003742201,0.0000868112,0.0000149728285,0.0003390506,0.000008302347,0.00039434794,0.000037866914,0.00031629708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016200387,0.000034870285,0.00006159036,0.000052590833,0.00022781859,0.00043761462,0.000038531653,0.000096293006,9.244777e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019520507,0.00080776744,0.49976122,0.000008236912,0.00003616949,0.000033318673,0.223004,0.0027723643,0.0021262344,0.26754948,0.00084441295,0.002861592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012014023,0.000036440695,0.57783884,0.0000441825,0.000006991179,0.000009958493,0.0253405,0.0005268721,0.00015390715,0.0005245654,0.39419916,0.00011718678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19556947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7996242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60405475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002963618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010511034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80978733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125995196","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2759","title":"The (ir)relevance of constitutional protection for property rights? Compensation for takings in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Statutory law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Property law; Constitutional law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Constraint (computer-aided design); Law; Government (linguistics); Economics; Private property","score_opus":0.02946621708068886,"score_gpt":0.23164383999305554,"score_spread":0.20217762291236668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125995196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7852731,0.0035284762,0.058962543,0.06903922,0.0026318042,0.0117591955,0.00028985392,0.000043452135,0.06847239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991362,0.00012157617,0.000308746,0.000024700106,0.000037560334,9.3343715e-7,0.00000227506,8.9592254e-7,0.00036708385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994972,0.00010287105,0.00009660161,0.0000466696,0.00016422528,0.00009244504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921197,0.00018360808,0.00014734469,0.000031723735,0.00038263685,0.000042715204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007457917,0.000034171662,0.00008316351,0.0000079705205,0.00094702194,0.00002045106,0.00012347035,0.0000178099,0.000010361226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000924677,0.000015818325,0.000023150347,0.000026723563,0.0008416532,0.00022588338,0.000010785143,0.00005096103,3.1981806e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015860132,0.000020676873,0.00018314176,0.000012163566,0.000036225745,0.0000010557816,0.0073715644,0.00044240223,0.000017554077,0.98613924,0.0011345088,0.0030554794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021601003,0.00006831348,0.0002550465,0.000027814533,0.00001483766,0.000002687858,0.006020245,0.004392486,0.000036043275,0.0066069313,0.9803727,0.00004275652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004922566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005944285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7283823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126045634","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.425","title":"REINVENTING THE NIGHT-WATCHMAN STATE?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Language change; Political science; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.020689580146145886,"score_gpt":0.2874990188203944,"score_spread":0.26680943867424856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126045634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60063785,0.000018249204,0.000081727085,0.0028478317,0.00043561214,0.000036920046,0.0000026168993,0.000012251455,0.39592692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931429,0.00022154205,0.0006750993,0.00008103363,0.00018819304,9.065835e-9,2.4541657e-7,0.0000021545532,0.0056888442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943465,0.00012203649,0.00006204351,0.000048080423,0.0001848102,0.00014837961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952716,0.0000756008,0.00013089851,0.000088647896,0.000080193015,0.000097511744],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069081684,0.000034193297,0.00005605836,0.0000065756512,0.002392465,0.000055563236,0.00030859577,0.00003682331,0.0039262758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021604752,0.000028800117,0.000070048955,0.000020049882,0.00029562006,0.0005773516,0.000033128723,0.00023884357,0.00001577355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006799809,0.00015878424,0.012704469,0.000008032483,0.00014705761,0.000042327454,0.68175364,0.00005433617,0.0033664482,0.2632155,0.019089524,0.019391876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014774466,0.000021636446,0.014802414,0.00000828591,0.000025472063,0.000018160381,0.0419733,0.0000133415115,0.000009311503,0.0007134095,0.94220877,0.00005816719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78619736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9670628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92311925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006221942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006454416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130335609","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0098","title":"Religious institutionalism: a feminist response","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalism; Sociology; Religious controversies; Religious organization; New institutionalism; Normative; Religious freedom; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Religious identity; Religious discrimination; Political science; Economic freedom; Politics; Religiosity; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013370208013375228,"score_gpt":0.260283591813146,"score_spread":0.24691338379977074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130335609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02454221,0.0009970139,0.00051690347,0.0025207298,0.00032036976,0.00002655196,0.000037243677,0.000016683989,0.9710223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908682,0.00054308795,0.002521108,0.00038017394,0.0001651354,1.4131734e-8,0.0000020973573,0.0000018453552,0.005518349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911195,0.0002657035,0.000089814304,0.00007896317,0.00029392607,0.00015964435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992142,0.00013372934,0.00009159334,0.00007946753,0.00029825929,0.00018277483],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038338278,0.000047218047,0.000103221166,0.000008996571,0.0013342432,0.000027313128,0.00017867956,0.00005382478,0.0015048746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013764833,0.00005790554,0.00009797626,0.000037613936,0.001267723,0.00021779582,0.000038135564,0.00009195476,0.000011935231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012402539,0.00003568909,0.00022135414,0.0000013758373,0.000024269246,0.0002826436,0.0030921265,0.000009665926,0.000056767585,0.9913286,0.004673709,0.00014976144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022945055,0.000023540559,0.0002964375,0.000018468596,0.000020260492,0.000111196256,0.015146042,6.940206e-7,0.00001661415,0.0007204849,0.9833501,0.000066687724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07003195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09667012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99060816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046740964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002965058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135184885","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0018","title":"The domain of private law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Reciprocal; Law; Normative; Core (optical fiber); Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Institution; Sociology; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.01659580473579248,"score_gpt":0.24110670887428515,"score_spread":0.22451090413849267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135184885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03883609,0.00035232,0.0012545713,0.018817509,0.00006931969,0.00010267245,0.000011168127,0.000013555042,0.9405428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815965,0.00029150245,0.0010970378,0.00010414412,0.0000843829,1.335408e-8,1.7788678e-7,0.0000014247082,0.0002616709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995739,0.00006119376,0.0000698489,0.000041978,0.00016510797,0.000088009976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996252,0.00003943818,0.000112760536,0.000057613935,0.000066474284,0.00009852579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021904113,0.000025679312,0.000060148563,0.0000013303118,0.0011922746,0.000018786723,0.00035053675,0.000022874929,0.00028315763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009508985,0.000021726322,0.000062576546,0.000021251304,0.0003962425,0.000185113,0.000050977018,0.00006379901,0.00000392875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015090498,0.000009364456,0.0000627809,0.0000013806232,0.000012916955,0.0000012943025,0.008157389,0.0000046080477,0.00022083249,0.9904209,0.0006141679,0.00047929137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014690455,0.000022626082,0.00025943658,0.0000040507935,0.000008358236,4.2388172e-7,0.013193877,0.000006298593,0.000054037766,0.0035921272,0.98268527,0.000026584243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056098513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16519994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98682874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006593944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042044067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.950187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150515959","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.191","title":"PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC RIGHT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Private law; Law; Tort; Unjust enrichment; Public law; Public interest; Political science; Economic Justice; Exclusive right; Common law; Commercial law; Liability; Law and economics; Normative; Private rights; Business; Sociology; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.02653600188505005,"score_gpt":0.2331907195830554,"score_spread":0.20665471769800536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150515959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033522338,0.00014742279,0.0003215694,0.0006768405,0.000047410424,0.00004330657,0.0000034356005,0.000013179792,0.9652245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678475,0.0002739386,0.0021003631,0.00006960508,0.000050699677,1.8452797e-8,2.522757e-7,0.0000016742058,0.0007186963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960685,0.000044061853,0.00005234429,0.00005968977,0.00011485211,0.00012220259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996298,0.000011127661,0.000071598515,0.00006342345,0.000069188325,0.00015488609],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018042397,0.0000324486,0.00005937299,0.0000055181936,0.0011431024,0.00003038293,0.00021075369,0.00003598967,0.002199542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004446704,0.000033052595,0.00003477165,0.000015916317,0.00039006872,0.00060891575,0.00005079899,0.00006208979,0.000006386233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004451812,0.000027362265,0.00047746248,9.704557e-7,0.0000110229175,0.000004010748,0.005632473,3.7105576e-8,0.00002048216,0.9931627,0.00019447177,0.0004645623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017228705,0.00001916863,0.002190022,0.0000045345064,0.000012035116,0.000003844001,0.0055038063,0.0000023075086,0.00002338053,0.0073636537,0.98465395,0.000051032224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20731443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46940053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033112436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159239982","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0035","title":"Elaborate imaginings: Rethinking environmental obligations in Canadian insolvency law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Debt; Judicial review; Environmental law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.012110517428257386,"score_gpt":0.22055626110435944,"score_spread":0.20844574367610205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159239982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2766473,0.00050242775,0.000017414604,0.008702331,0.00013020361,0.000114173614,0.00007380346,0.000015969323,0.7137964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774754,0.00041953824,0.000600312,0.0009149353,0.00010139238,2.9998205e-8,0.0000044527524,0.0000045297106,0.00020727221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921066,0.00011814342,0.000105898485,0.00009987502,0.00019993588,0.0002655048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936646,0.00001887474,0.00008823837,0.00005430223,0.000008953949,0.00046319736],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002290879,0.00006321505,0.00010065268,0.000015313193,0.0009057148,0.000030589235,0.00026626803,0.00006502099,0.002203561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010272401,0.00008202079,0.000050695508,0.000040911113,0.00041719197,0.0007595679,0.00003507968,0.00018438688,0.000025641895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026533804,0.000054379794,0.036574632,0.000005288477,0.000031932854,0.00014655759,0.19155465,0.00006350914,0.00061584805,0.76925284,0.00080223504,0.00087159796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064510683,0.00007862382,0.013557729,0.000036874295,0.000024632169,0.0000047066133,0.03771678,0.000038842856,0.00005738884,0.0033374964,0.94429076,0.00021106639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99364066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94348854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010276298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017585303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163237934","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0135","title":"The notwithstanding clause: Legislatures, courts, and the electorate","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Charter; Legislature; Law; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Free Exercise Clause; Law and economics; First amendment; Sociology","score_opus":0.010382390662058916,"score_gpt":0.2284526592122968,"score_spread":0.21807026855023787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163237934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015717708,0.056625985,0.00043188292,0.024206305,0.0007833481,0.00011093362,0.000008369392,0.000016258798,0.9020992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98484224,0.013591469,0.000061783925,0.000089732406,0.0001840835,1.9388937e-8,1.6937044e-7,0.0000010357124,0.0012294666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937624,0.00016768782,0.00005573473,0.000051515497,0.00022460357,0.00012420361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994782,0.00017529598,0.00007434914,0.00004182849,0.00018339965,0.000046912184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051035493,0.00003702815,0.00008106763,0.0000024054286,0.005356508,0.00007857722,0.00014259141,0.000027604892,0.0001205827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006357114,0.00002341172,0.00004933006,0.000021403574,0.0014405489,0.00018033254,0.000052731633,0.000110572946,8.17736e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007106229,0.000004854705,0.0002549363,4.473755e-7,0.00006027975,0.000018264254,0.004240696,0.000001297154,0.000013256235,0.9921923,0.0021872798,0.0009552882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005296074,0.000010034371,0.0013852845,0.000017131166,0.000042479867,0.0000140661,0.028161472,0.0000035955802,0.000007828102,0.023860548,0.9459211,0.000046845136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08400747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5611285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96912456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012981366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017199379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99593836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194464316","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0011","title":"The death of law? Computationally personalized norms and the rule of law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Rule of law; Law; Private law; Personalization; Public law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.02841311351289822,"score_gpt":0.2863250007659639,"score_spread":0.2579118872530657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194464316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12476674,0.0028867172,0.0018465589,0.0049335402,0.00034725465,0.00017373913,0.000025302885,0.00001033764,0.8650098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743813,0.0005442885,0.0011152122,0.00010210485,0.00005445127,2.9972277e-8,6.9735273e-7,0.0000024397891,0.0007426628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898005,0.000268592,0.00016619616,0.00007099801,0.00039321685,0.000120928424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986085,0.0005008959,0.0002334378,0.000083401996,0.0005127711,0.000060967268],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007906132,0.000049799637,0.00015725716,0.000004145646,0.0014979327,0.000034699842,0.00031007268,0.000043240932,0.0005605809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005420822,0.000035598398,0.000119092416,0.000022289616,0.003097552,0.00027541086,0.00007009742,0.00008955083,0.0000012058896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010737514,0.000026483842,0.00016947232,0.0000035263038,0.00005272609,0.000005068704,0.027941527,0.00004894508,0.00007070712,0.9710697,0.000034312463,0.0004701351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017789503,0.00013009898,0.001624699,0.00012955142,0.00020886971,0.000035260833,0.18429004,0.00051343767,0.0017662133,0.19510363,0.6141877,0.00023152132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16838866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2738972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87267137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008974588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013649254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197035081","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0132","title":"When, and how, does property matter?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Law and economics; Nothing; Property law; Property rights; Law; Private property; Intangible property; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Restitution; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.012809334355310438,"score_gpt":0.2137237181715257,"score_spread":0.20091438381621526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197035081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034869898,0.0018154023,0.00025409684,0.06160657,0.00046061687,0.000107394786,0.000010238199,0.000026914258,0.90084887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8397718,0.0016438363,0.001794083,0.00023373598,0.00020692302,1.692265e-8,7.2616405e-7,0.0000038965754,0.15634498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994209,0.00012303953,0.00004419653,0.00009148072,0.00018180403,0.00013859352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995694,0.000013557063,0.000055773013,0.00006499394,0.00016174464,0.00013448895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018812991,0.000047859005,0.00010640879,0.0000061098044,0.00084430416,0.000094662675,0.00014664924,0.000041909057,0.005906199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011285616,0.000024410465,0.0000484704,0.000013484118,0.0002634734,0.0006890924,0.000055757464,0.000084286294,0.000005676885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004197385,0.000604148,0.023901895,0.0001484798,0.00056061125,0.0019249999,0.16733567,0.0000026532243,0.0060048453,0.47023004,0.1988958,0.12997115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026914058,0.000021949087,0.0011761576,0.000023511788,0.000017810144,0.000020445339,0.010009314,0.0000033863105,0.00011288467,0.00059214997,0.9876869,0.000066383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1019798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4115184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8049019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010884725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009382821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199404808","doi":"","title":"Are M&A Lawyers Better at Contract Drafting?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.025655701782349168,"score_gpt":0.26936531552930976,"score_spread":0.2437096137469606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199404808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5576148,0.00032103696,0.00015450091,0.0032752168,0.00091596146,0.0001262432,0.000027023309,0.00004344302,0.4375218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963248,0.00004494862,0.0003045103,0.00044384404,0.00017608237,7.205073e-8,7.720611e-7,0.0000056420245,0.0026993696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863535,0.00030786506,0.00013423654,0.00012101695,0.00053132186,0.00027023163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991507,0.0001029102,0.00036154257,0.000104880426,0.0001223439,0.00015760027],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006803379,0.00006755822,0.00014354408,0.000015534079,0.004486894,0.000030673695,0.0005117359,0.00004597349,0.031681914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033793283,0.00008489484,0.0001414763,0.000038573344,0.00051697064,0.00047039756,0.00017971692,0.00021807208,0.000027521548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011913826,0.0008031685,0.118394844,0.000020976933,0.0004628931,0.001947106,0.3483236,0.001713424,0.0021326267,0.4248436,0.07611981,0.02404656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013860689,0.00004796984,0.0014312508,0.00000794111,0.000023676586,0.000013586971,0.0801303,0.000025653655,0.000087965454,0.00039174067,0.91758895,0.00011233351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14769296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5214073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84146917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001442762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065843866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199535267","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0048","title":"Popular sovereignty and constitutional democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Popular sovereignty; Democracy; State (computer science); Rhetoric; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014590500417542323,"score_gpt":0.2518528578356401,"score_spread":0.23726235741809779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199535267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016485417,0.0008598381,0.0014097639,0.00047559876,0.00016138183,0.000021099568,0.000013087672,0.000009151194,0.98056465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677396,0.00056592666,0.0012129527,0.00014905968,0.00008929166,4.4117328e-9,0.0000012237037,9.365234e-7,0.0012066504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999335,0.0001967653,0.00006606882,0.00007847634,0.00015805327,0.00016566543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995136,0.00006920033,0.000048711834,0.000051267587,0.0001351029,0.00018207087],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000267113,0.000041275576,0.00010572807,0.0000052655623,0.0012955588,0.000015917045,0.00009493292,0.000081687336,0.007706164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009487523,0.00004764703,0.00006117013,0.00001393198,0.0030226638,0.00036711057,0.00004843904,0.000107615,0.0000052459814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016221913,0.000025467021,0.0009173348,0.0000017770237,0.000029068058,0.00010514847,0.00046773918,0.0000011418064,0.0000059705576,0.9979891,0.00011890902,0.0003221155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004898673,0.000019148529,0.0019917358,0.000016761953,0.0000357322,0.00010164442,0.009307232,0.000005781074,0.00002855379,0.9060065,0.08191453,0.00008249735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033723689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004502374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98028857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014164043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024935722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199818095","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0007","title":"Farewell to the F-word? Fragmentation of international law in times of the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); International law; Political science; Scholarship; Law; Dialectic; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0191897909301938,"score_gpt":0.2843033732650755,"score_spread":0.2651135823348817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199818095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46438825,0.00025701115,0.0011707657,0.018346226,0.0010593513,0.00020348036,0.00006830503,0.000007521139,0.51449907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974323,0.00013045731,0.00022655452,0.00039121037,0.000059045826,4.5291408e-8,0.000002801248,0.0000012560348,0.0017563334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992226,0.00017531929,0.00012415399,0.00005423591,0.00036279447,0.000060925293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939036,0.000090782836,0.00018070482,0.00005587813,0.00024360324,0.00003868675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043487785,0.00003065366,0.00006611045,0.000011930894,0.000266635,0.0000116573865,0.00033039832,0.000031442818,0.002022699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008348383,0.000024827923,0.00006915822,0.000043897024,0.0001402718,0.00022177755,0.00005346702,0.00006381234,0.0000014550433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005162736,0.000054233762,0.02366348,0.0000041971207,0.000035436464,0.000002991664,0.016666418,0.0010815812,0.00039798502,0.95678955,0.00073433423,0.0005181585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00126361,0.00004845762,0.047735363,0.0001015855,0.000043024418,0.000013714863,0.05369919,0.00010543586,0.001077195,0.012135515,0.8836562,0.00012072579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15228257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68584466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94465405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004286112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001771612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200467662","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0023","title":"Combatting corruption and collusion in public procurement: Lessons from Operation Car Wash","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social; Governo Brasil","keywords":"Collusion; Procurement; Language change; Incentive; Competition (biology); Enforcement; Law enforcement; Business; Economics; Public economics; Industrial organization; Market economy; Law; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.039380567322648344,"score_gpt":0.26540796231657143,"score_spread":0.2260273949939231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200467662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9354087,0.00032778556,0.000446046,0.0042740623,0.0003392371,0.00008471627,0.000005820515,0.00000997516,0.059103623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972634,0.0010795516,0.00081077387,0.00005021109,0.00003991779,4.3380936e-8,0.0000065576705,0.0000015727718,0.00074799673],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994781,0.00010705182,0.00010088378,0.0000919825,0.000120714634,0.00010123744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968123,0.00002003623,0.00008212882,0.000035281988,0.00009935936,0.0000819707],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003800153,0.00003628951,0.00008474554,0.000015229077,0.00067701284,0.000072269475,0.000072072886,0.00004388988,0.0019141798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023958133,0.00004627245,0.000021383285,0.000023334469,0.00005739413,0.00056276296,0.000054938035,0.00006350955,0.0000032991597],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015566192,0.00051529484,0.12813558,0.000029683746,0.00013236277,0.00013518467,0.26855266,0.00018854561,0.009471191,0.25240752,0.0011088476,0.33916748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032066905,0.000050508905,0.22134386,0.00019244476,0.00003390895,0.0000140430075,0.29105055,0.0012518072,0.00012044284,0.0005554601,0.4818616,0.00031868453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042527862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6528173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61028945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006786942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021200406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200710296","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0014","title":"Corruption and the criminal law: Assurance and deterrence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Criminal justice; Deterrence (psychology); Language change; Criminal law; Law and economics; Compliance (psychology); Cheating; Psychological intervention; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.018395647837976866,"score_gpt":0.23760055582198655,"score_spread":0.21920490798400968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200710296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49147823,0.002431457,0.0012834321,0.0041579856,0.0006575247,0.000089614194,0.0000028767313,0.000013286078,0.4998856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99451756,0.0030658285,0.00072260987,0.0001357615,0.000036570924,1.9962165e-8,2.4461735e-7,8.8172413e-7,0.0015205392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996199,0.00009458993,0.000059890644,0.00006412322,0.000083879386,0.000077597826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997092,0.000057778077,0.00006438105,0.000035731046,0.00006610008,0.000066817134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037809543,0.000030405576,0.00007338307,0.0000033609947,0.00082216476,0.00005088896,0.000071574694,0.000023201015,0.000704252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018379564,0.000028530018,0.000024592135,0.00000802792,0.00043884723,0.00029383902,0.000039095834,0.00005111846,0.0000020326831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002177764,0.000033252578,0.0034360397,0.000012488055,0.000045481152,0.000041703748,0.0799066,0.0000061608416,0.00008210688,0.8012403,0.00035239675,0.11462565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028801204,0.000038350314,0.061007466,0.00008393722,0.00008155393,0.0001640047,0.16478175,0.00018220235,0.000020651925,0.0017737377,0.7687881,0.00019814787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029792294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4643035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7994666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010144235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006962477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9766684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201412318","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0043","title":"From birth to agony: The political life of Operation Car Wash (Operação Lava Jato)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Opera; Language change; Lava; Power (physics); Intervention (counseling); Balance (ability); Political science; Political corruption; Law; Sociology; History; Art; Geology; Literature; Psychology; Art history; Volcano","score_opus":0.017486322434149052,"score_gpt":0.255328627901139,"score_spread":0.23784230546698998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201412318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8712831,0.000933078,0.0004853222,0.008786785,0.0004894547,0.00008886124,0.00013007502,0.000011644884,0.11779168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996435,0.00028599412,0.00031654164,0.0004640721,0.0003811249,2.3023109e-8,0.0000017597997,0.0000037675852,0.0021117234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898064,0.0001992909,0.00011721116,0.00010859855,0.00038974092,0.00020452985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999221,0.00011176937,0.00009290131,0.00012973495,0.00023008113,0.00021446773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020200032,0.00006252328,0.00016386117,0.000007786383,0.00066089554,0.000046708545,0.00028869376,0.00005958901,0.0020950472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011778047,0.00005794265,0.0001009481,0.000036569363,0.00023039595,0.0004374098,0.000068598034,0.00011252898,0.0000062972845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018973854,0.00024108833,0.0036507866,0.000012811806,0.00018325438,0.000069666596,0.17856254,0.0001442829,0.0066007813,0.79037267,0.01652477,0.0034476111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000726644,0.00009161268,0.01282043,0.000065753164,0.00007062851,0.000006173652,0.42362845,0.000044652166,0.0028707974,0.00093025534,0.5585544,0.00019021604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59512293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63176477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7894424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003308126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042425594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203351226","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0088","title":"The judicial review of legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Administrative law; Legitimacy; Ultra vires; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.01895730970178488,"score_gpt":0.26709398360848474,"score_spread":0.24813667390669986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203351226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001058206,0.09648247,0.00007014891,0.007198851,0.00033740056,0.000039879105,0.0000064591463,0.0000042330594,0.89480233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7361799,0.2622543,0.00017742111,0.00028833913,0.0002768877,2.29175e-8,5.916986e-7,0.0000011863245,0.0008213543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993137,0.00016027264,0.0000997182,0.000043737167,0.00029030492,0.00009227444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992666,0.00006777373,0.00012384982,0.000049919578,0.00044587185,0.000045940724],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005479178,0.000028786968,0.00011675902,0.0000018294076,0.0017446681,0.000008384802,0.00017130039,0.000020383812,0.00073253835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012989475,0.000024411906,0.00011316933,0.000033160242,0.0007912311,0.00015213991,0.000048817546,0.000058216403,0.0000020365364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013850584,0.00002539499,0.00028827583,0.000024395595,0.000056160105,0.000014078229,0.0010515265,2.3913128e-7,0.000013744432,0.9874032,0.0060297227,0.0050793868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001020005,0.000012502337,0.0020477911,0.0004158643,0.000045521076,0.0000039092924,0.009702038,1.2279028e-7,0.000016646909,0.0059170495,0.98170114,0.00003540861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1647014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48489857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012168539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003274375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204240245","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0063","title":"Clash of powers: Did Operation Car Wash trigger a constitutional crisis in Brazil?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impeachment; Mandate; Politics; Political science; Constitutional amendment; Democracy; Language change; Presidential system; Law; Separation of powers; Political economy; Constitutional crisis; Constitutional court; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.014173507237649693,"score_gpt":0.2587681920036555,"score_spread":0.24459468476600577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204240245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1296196,0.003311135,0.001201452,0.0061687627,0.0006605008,0.00012123607,0.0000535064,0.000013463865,0.85885036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977938,0.001482398,0.00030732778,0.00008517851,0.000083129074,3.7530356e-8,0.0000022982092,8.8564167e-7,0.00024496124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992059,0.000119435,0.00014193336,0.000090526126,0.00031916727,0.00012305025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941254,0.000042363667,0.00009177457,0.00004184771,0.00034585534,0.000065603934],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002692218,0.000050137038,0.00016265643,0.000018983235,0.0006932548,0.000015968868,0.00012431458,0.00005756895,0.0013267077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004963493,0.0000558508,0.00009862412,0.00005892975,0.0010248241,0.00046074067,0.00004435834,0.00008315956,0.0000038818775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055576715,0.00010572016,0.0032348456,0.000003346504,0.00006241174,0.00005771301,0.0061604315,0.000089152985,0.0003688958,0.98703873,0.0024648216,0.00035834915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037712217,0.00015086937,0.025204131,0.00026427375,0.00017229724,0.000053144533,0.24891566,0.000033163997,0.0006345814,0.017253177,0.7031114,0.0004360927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11280537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39480618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035205725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006091816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205252510","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0137","title":"Remedial consistency in private law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Consistency (knowledge bases); Duty; Wrongdoing; Compensation (psychology); Constructive trust; Law; Sequential consistency; Law and economics; Political science; Consistency model; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Data consistency","score_opus":0.01784485825747845,"score_gpt":0.2559892153328297,"score_spread":0.23814435707535125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205252510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05786771,0.00027803954,0.00012492518,0.0026457177,0.00014905757,0.000049118647,0.0000047530416,0.000009827291,0.93887085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964992,0.00044828738,0.0016621207,0.00009372951,0.00010139953,2.2982833e-8,0.0000010232433,0.0000017490344,0.0011924952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945295,0.00008948904,0.00008761928,0.00007291993,0.00017001205,0.00012700613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999611,0.000032387656,0.00006893929,0.00007811025,0.00011245691,0.00009705991],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023691167,0.000032577533,0.00008501783,0.000005329259,0.0006266655,0.000024533776,0.00017658128,0.000044155648,0.0012937069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021641941,0.000039032057,0.000058711707,0.00003551164,0.0002652248,0.00030856766,0.00004903196,0.000097507895,0.0000071130876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007460617,0.00004292535,0.0007464213,0.0000014041519,0.0000075391586,0.000046624365,0.004334647,0.000003471382,0.0002207423,0.9937554,0.0002299325,0.00060345256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039619755,0.0000114688855,0.0028157742,0.000019278159,0.000010964757,0.0000062564486,0.012876828,0.0000049847235,0.000083106825,0.004337075,0.97937596,0.00006213041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13839969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87834156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023481577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000166018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206450776","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0119","title":"Systemic corruption and institutional multiplicity: Brazilian examples of a complex relationship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Honesty; Incentive; Language change; Enforcement; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Public economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.049469307102950416,"score_gpt":0.26252749595097424,"score_spread":0.21305818884802383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206450776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8935159,0.000379353,0.0031036122,0.0004056825,0.00025186356,0.000072969,0.000015207633,0.000011975879,0.10224342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602634,0.00037746178,0.0026851955,0.000019470464,0.0000310886,2.4728294e-8,0.0000048939787,0.0000012156339,0.00085428683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949986,0.00009436336,0.00013017766,0.000072866256,0.0001253429,0.00007738591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995173,0.000061045175,0.00013765614,0.000044970777,0.00015425037,0.00008475147],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003166813,0.000036234524,0.000105744395,0.000016464464,0.000700273,0.00001757384,0.00007564718,0.000043175754,0.0013311905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045171317,0.000045850662,0.000041750238,0.000023419672,0.0002295557,0.00030833686,0.00003589044,0.000051911884,0.000003629523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011319684,0.00014628073,0.17804891,0.000067485045,0.00010052715,0.000032918877,0.050896794,0.00024496412,0.0022420515,0.72079754,0.00037335805,0.04693595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00132347,0.000028844706,0.71299297,0.00016649588,0.00003733006,0.00012999012,0.08243365,0.0003205801,0.000015325915,0.00044225543,0.20195429,0.0001548187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02233312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19590351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72035533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036189283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022616616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206639810","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0055","title":"The limits of evidence-based anti-bribery law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Causal inference; Law and economics; Psychological intervention; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Business; Public economics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07486109082667752,"score_gpt":0.24454920663611618,"score_spread":0.16968811580943866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206639810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19055514,0.014270088,0.0019100163,0.020385968,0.0015212826,0.00020218264,0.0000043946975,0.00006008224,0.77109087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809957,0.00041323874,0.0002270849,0.00032030867,0.00017016586,1.9921993e-8,7.080834e-7,0.0000031190975,0.0007657865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948436,0.00001739649,0.000115657895,0.00007218525,0.00020812263,0.000102303144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999084,0.00006510559,0.00022993979,0.000120133416,0.00049158465,0.000009268592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017949154,0.00005743281,0.00012777909,0.000009565639,0.00069593365,0.00006774391,0.00019937946,0.000020743793,0.00039322983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028069446,0.00004392214,0.000116150215,0.000047969326,0.0001780353,0.0009422935,0.0000724651,0.00005293638,0.0000076075808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024849034,0.00016455287,0.01672987,0.0001732046,0.00026513785,0.000088479515,0.0002528034,0.0007620404,0.0021588083,0.94550693,0.017234875,0.016414808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010020981,0.000022508304,0.08786268,0.0005257662,0.0001360426,0.000008703394,0.0052271816,0.0008156784,0.0006894502,0.0020232908,0.9015034,0.00018323558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050976323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027047075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94348365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038189544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027681373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208393888","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0062","title":"Private liability without wrongdoing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Plaintiff; Law; Liability; Injustice; Duty; Legal liability; Strict liability; Private law; Permission; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.016246374383488582,"score_gpt":0.20797009930637617,"score_spread":0.19172372492288758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208393888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8533351,0.00014452904,0.00046741744,0.00034550717,0.00053444697,0.00009625387,0.00002300075,0.000039224782,0.14501454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997835,0.00004520158,0.0006076446,0.0000961056,0.000039464285,4.1333475e-8,2.8912862e-7,0.000004469175,0.0013718079],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907154,0.00018647005,0.00010182936,0.0001579533,0.0003114521,0.0001707539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995505,0.0000367229,0.00013887187,0.00015387523,0.000024388148,0.00009559887],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024340782,0.00006572542,0.000115065726,0.000012612956,0.0012472864,0.0000144849355,0.00046735335,0.000016392143,0.0053215534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000331162,0.000071842966,0.000098076016,0.000034852877,0.00014204095,0.00042647927,0.0002702962,0.00020984399,0.0000063549883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013687022,0.0017933369,0.037227377,0.00010730824,0.000095405325,0.0014926838,0.016564578,0.0037620945,0.5519932,0.3430456,0.008718575,0.033831157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017833416,0.0005668066,0.008772272,0.000024905748,0.000045740933,0.00046133233,0.0034473112,0.00091369747,0.011024962,0.0028062314,0.96977776,0.00037561398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038941244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022450425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9610592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030057342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003498315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212606031","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0090.br","title":"Stephen P Garvey, <i>Guilty Acts, Guilty Minds</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.015146492737580225,"score_gpt":0.2425762131743265,"score_spread":0.22742972043674628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212606031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012321908,0.002536787,0.0001261614,0.002926482,0.0006166401,0.00006530334,0.000026762264,0.00003175206,0.9813482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8962867,0.009772293,0.009513404,0.0010280013,0.0013644929,8.480749e-8,0.000019540543,0.000017929038,0.081997514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987155,0.0002667246,0.00012018969,0.00014665541,0.00047264027,0.00027827622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989574,0.000048994145,0.00015611337,0.00017613338,0.0004187279,0.00024261179],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046343764,0.00008830847,0.0001778616,0.0000017950754,0.0017228656,0.00007338686,0.0005271516,0.00017639875,0.007845715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057738576,0.0000952009,0.00024573653,0.00005717595,0.00040780453,0.00069491396,0.000118772004,0.00021449619,0.000017450835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001089118,0.00044951122,0.0021902397,0.000033976165,0.0004460472,0.00047134617,0.14244838,0.000023287193,0.0013285171,0.43903342,0.40687686,0.0065895133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045432238,0.00002166112,0.0006344663,0.000029277313,0.000050681596,0.000016750597,0.08307286,0.0000013554968,0.00016009226,0.00089659746,0.91454685,0.00011507349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025184778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32613724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8993507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043972288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003128713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213473835","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0034","title":"Giving reasons as a means to enhance compliance with legal norms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Sanctions; Compliance (psychology); Nudge theory; Enforcement; Law and economics; Relevance (law); Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.013518099946229734,"score_gpt":0.22598813453550332,"score_spread":0.21247003458927358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213473835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11735847,0.00044183622,0.014083137,0.0055922437,0.00029580298,0.00011321949,0.0000030854994,0.000054033022,0.86205816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98754144,0.000039767623,0.003445008,0.00069541036,0.0002466164,8.696034e-8,0.0000014938227,0.000007271532,0.008022924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935555,0.000008021056,0.00009118606,0.00014761566,0.0002309464,0.00016668272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925786,0.000011056032,0.00014345332,0.0001322299,0.00042759298,0.000027778124],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008281726,0.000092137256,0.00016530481,0.000018747167,0.00060609146,0.00011720387,0.00019861782,0.000019585366,0.0012827616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016414027,0.000089706846,0.000066005414,0.00008857494,0.00006770124,0.0012266794,0.0001268759,0.00007871144,0.00006601343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014442186,0.00067266333,0.037671532,0.00049299834,0.0009439368,0.001613267,0.0039785686,0.0035136016,0.004517471,0.8281494,0.060383357,0.056618996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000498196,0.000034282293,0.034517318,0.00035419516,0.000051278275,0.000065762964,0.007838097,0.0002600446,0.00012067901,0.00039118473,0.9556368,0.00023215092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01184305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.120519646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8952535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009277473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003177035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213682929","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0099","title":"The city in the constitutional imagination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Megacity; Constitutionalism; Metropolitan area; Government (linguistics); Politics; Urbanization; State (computer science); City-state; Political economy; Silence; Political science; Emancipation; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economy; Economics; Economic growth; History; Democracy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.017607447257000513,"score_gpt":0.2546349311284768,"score_spread":0.2370274838714763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213682929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009463619,0.0033101293,0.0005335119,0.016461868,0.00030122465,0.000043482043,0.0000045671504,0.0000040759714,0.96987754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980546,0.0014512216,0.000075489574,0.0001100495,0.00010254832,3.1119168e-8,4.838552e-7,2.530459e-7,0.00020531069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938047,0.00016517134,0.000054662938,0.000040653897,0.00026961486,0.00008943667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995499,0.00013160074,0.00004642563,0.000033363,0.00021662124,0.000022048423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055210304,0.000024810071,0.000043911386,0.0000033264503,0.002847278,0.000035657165,0.00017888917,0.000017735994,0.00027031882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078721496,0.000017809461,0.00004554612,0.000038033326,0.0018833482,0.00023308072,0.000026419877,0.00007961277,0.0000023290027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075442667,0.00002046347,0.0023842654,2.1152158e-7,0.000010700162,0.000022491173,0.0031357408,0.0000029420216,0.0000048400757,0.9922674,0.0008002227,0.0013432113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021824575,0.000006960247,0.027349284,0.000011500441,0.000012508526,0.000017336846,0.067369975,0.0000024873013,0.000004115408,0.04262644,0.86234236,0.00003877729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07451428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6065309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019252516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002972276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214682557","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0042.br","title":"Hanoch Dagan, <i>A Liberal Theory of Property</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Mathematics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018800059681103348,"score_gpt":0.2283910366791582,"score_spread":0.20959097699805485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214682557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018192353,0.0018059192,0.00028774512,0.001736881,0.0002778713,0.00006818425,0.000007956567,0.000015912801,0.9776072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89048916,0.0012832447,0.0014377732,0.00013573644,0.0002093902,1.8364691e-8,0.0000015446724,0.0000054323,0.10643771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906605,0.00027288022,0.00011458627,0.00009198812,0.00028686132,0.00016761669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992401,0.000033010598,0.00015407163,0.000104874605,0.00034223465,0.00012568066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045170996,0.00005722737,0.00016356357,0.0000094844145,0.0006045503,0.000026885591,0.00029430678,0.000058085367,0.005230323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030280513,0.00004029387,0.00011982375,0.00004044028,0.00038586423,0.0005487753,0.000062906445,0.000112526664,0.0000051091747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028115668,0.0003138525,0.0004304274,0.000025934823,0.00016679981,0.00026586515,0.028397135,0.000007245702,0.0040279566,0.9294571,0.010213705,0.0264128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005457603,0.0000769666,0.00037092998,0.000053323314,0.000039209568,0.00002022923,0.009046388,0.0000041349485,0.001659206,0.0028803798,0.98520863,0.00009486857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04368485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15508999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012428354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002901922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214749934","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0105","title":"‘Within or outside Canada’: The Charter’s application to the extraterritorial activities of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Mandate; Supreme court; Presumption","score_opus":0.013082003700187955,"score_gpt":0.22357188091480212,"score_spread":0.21048987721461418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214749934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51689255,0.0014960073,0.00033073672,0.19410253,0.012973091,0.002182756,0.0009057936,0.000033222066,0.2710833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877644,0.000026451235,0.000014120436,0.0004825834,0.0002475541,5.094701e-7,4.2924748e-7,0.0000016797998,0.00045021382],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889517,0.00035875096,0.00009876353,0.0000746517,0.00042372703,0.00014895723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999434,0.00009710992,0.00011685591,0.0001521115,0.00011324046,0.00008666475],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006913035,0.000051523395,0.00008470635,0.000006951156,0.0054822075,0.000016240434,0.00075095484,0.000019173756,0.00043968132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024403871,0.000031390584,0.00004534392,0.000075594915,0.00018957835,0.00013259953,0.00012492905,0.00017773923,4.0404356e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031344185,0.00003893035,0.0009328321,0.000013262122,0.0001276314,0.000011786533,0.8380882,0.0017653247,0.000035577315,0.12310397,0.03427112,0.0012978896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052274198,0.000030421541,0.0010233455,0.000006028097,0.000020901929,0.000004737641,0.44218218,0.00004672338,0.000036639423,0.0005808462,0.5559631,0.00005283134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.521692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009160983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015477611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99581254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215614503","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0028","title":"On the breach: Identifying infringements of section 35 rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0310557196913512,"score_gpt":0.27036531051999246,"score_spread":0.23930959082864126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215614503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69737744,0.00041105476,0.00009700482,0.0010402541,0.00062599813,0.000080572754,0.0000037477444,0.000012175046,0.30035177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973245,0.00022676688,0.00018975505,0.000021795831,0.00010856161,2.3745173e-8,3.6474276e-7,0.0000013530359,0.0021268642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991838,0.00018667775,0.00008785967,0.00006862368,0.0003575042,0.00011555449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999422,0.00008778091,0.00015734394,0.00005871208,0.00022727055,0.000046882247],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003011133,0.000047006426,0.00009977773,0.000005990867,0.0018673701,0.00002842361,0.00017894812,0.000040275478,0.001407716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048009864,0.000036648773,0.00009895252,0.000034754037,0.00021206484,0.00034477562,0.00006341336,0.0001070443,0.000003328184],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015840931,0.00041387393,0.0048808246,0.00004455731,0.000973925,0.00014003314,0.41811907,0.000109268316,0.004581047,0.5523534,0.01408302,0.0041425615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017326971,0.00016312767,0.055461567,0.00042998474,0.00024911045,0.000017979824,0.38814864,0.000021947755,0.0022789221,0.0073559945,0.5437798,0.0003602252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17266087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3881525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5449974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052647904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003669361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217101867","doi":"","title":"How the Prison is a Black Box in Punishment Theory (University of Toronto Law Journal, 2019)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01112758708649897,"score_gpt":0.23011584782306796,"score_spread":0.218988260736569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217101867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73960197,0.004485337,0.0018836497,0.0048756753,0.0007582559,0.0003146495,0.00001948361,0.000018685389,0.2480423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859873,0.006543336,0.00027320185,0.0000718969,0.00009446961,1.0012194e-8,6.37551e-7,0.0000047402214,0.0070244293],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985276,0.0004292332,0.00014052811,0.00014415123,0.0004981246,0.00026039156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881333,0.00011350134,0.0003867441,0.00021453557,0.0003219521,0.00014992834],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011171465,0.00010414738,0.00026631463,0.000027789863,0.0012543545,0.00009531221,0.0007027072,0.00010298399,0.005425202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017014167,0.000099028985,0.00031138764,0.0000726598,0.0004952402,0.001387299,0.00010159473,0.00025615853,0.000012169027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012812217,0.00090477837,0.004721882,0.00008307201,0.0010135864,0.00017240751,0.65729266,0.00027340226,0.000523072,0.25046352,0.021538772,0.061731648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049751066,0.00012767162,0.0008200465,0.0000636134,0.0002977799,0.000010428761,0.8163385,0.000053226435,0.000015009281,0.0003486299,0.18132119,0.00010640755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69127154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9439819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2527103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010238263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014888361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200022466","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0059","title":"Heritage preservation easements, urban property, and heritage law: Exploring Canadian common law and civil law tools for responding to international cultural preservation frameworks for cities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Cultural heritage; Cultural heritage management; Cultural property; Industrial heritage; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Property law; Property rights; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11015196299193279,"score_gpt":0.24222850522882433,"score_spread":0.13207654223689153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200022466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4093103,0.0015237175,0.0007943002,0.011312557,0.0016072916,0.0021629313,0.00081925053,0.00009709266,0.57237256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97909415,0.00013716496,0.0020219237,0.0010403619,0.0004746818,0.000009917153,0.00026636102,0.000016158796,0.016939268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991127,0.000056466837,0.0002082629,0.00020108222,0.0001988956,0.00022256422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903405,0.00009458725,0.00011979445,0.00010935463,0.0004977903,0.00014444868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002516513,0.00013864909,0.00018171936,0.000040699917,0.0014730215,0.0009134974,0.00020760171,0.00007504092,0.000503167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003746381,0.00013018378,0.000072644114,0.000022306014,0.00013841139,0.0067964196,0.00013682502,0.00013053253,4.1838553e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000264257,0.000023216173,0.00021367757,0.000106303516,0.00011532241,0.0000073114356,0.028105954,0.0000181825,0.00022641562,0.964178,0.0060435757,0.0006977762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008331851,0.00015050775,0.00030413168,0.00020409859,0.000055965233,0.0000025909906,0.042320833,0.00046016148,0.00008363786,0.0042912867,0.95109767,0.00019595827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25586805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9602275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9598867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023461568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019789386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200610885","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0136","title":"Automating accountability? Privacy policies, data transparency, and the third party problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Argument (complex analysis); Internet privacy; Analytics; Usability; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Computer science; Privacy by Design; Data sharing; Business; Computer security; Data science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.036533492700662785,"score_gpt":0.28441747803439976,"score_spread":0.24788398533373698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200610885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38917303,0.019003967,0.011859074,0.05729582,0.0012328731,0.0017022185,0.0007154877,0.00033128585,0.51868623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99194,0.0033720827,0.0041708937,0.00010044247,0.00020037514,1.1247221e-7,0.000018138966,0.0000038938833,0.00019402872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998682,0.00046204464,0.00015481425,0.00017695302,0.00032802226,0.0001961572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990172,0.0001246569,0.00016476733,0.00043584112,0.00015395782,0.000103610866],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016469704,0.000069924754,0.00015952534,0.00000816558,0.0020409895,0.00013980878,0.0010063893,0.00006869205,0.00048995845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023805945,0.000060613354,0.000051513056,0.00005343861,0.00066205044,0.0018228345,0.00053712394,0.00019202384,0.0000013998857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051565154,0.00046815802,0.01486118,0.00021407,0.00038116303,0.000057944384,0.45183083,0.000009545236,0.00038103055,0.4710724,0.019915631,0.04029237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034242363,0.000062918276,0.014687413,0.0001561528,0.00022862025,0.00008231717,0.11969375,0.00048208341,0.000068054054,0.026100565,0.83469546,0.00031845388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30681795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5532027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8147798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017408408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027814804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205940295","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.163","title":"The Sword in the Zone: Fantasies of Land-Use Planning Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Urban Planning and Landscape Design","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Deference; Urban sprawl; Urban planning; Law and economics; Political science; Urbanism; Sociology; Architecture; Geography","score_opus":0.014895571651411081,"score_gpt":0.20096314137191182,"score_spread":0.18606756972050073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205940295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82338685,0.001622542,0.0003485467,0.00024138499,0.00019808239,0.00010507928,0.000011848894,0.000010093697,0.17407559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999247,0.000065395216,0.00023812888,0.000047501326,0.000028617073,2.6933225e-8,8.8181315e-7,0.0000022940583,0.00037014822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993556,0.00012133044,0.00008986034,0.00004835433,0.00020750033,0.00017734281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954706,0.00018265977,0.00010698097,0.00011004304,0.0000060478756,0.00004723193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005552568,0.000055249653,0.0000840855,0.0000048223756,0.0003877901,0.000020320842,0.0003204911,0.000030843974,0.00027618825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007843033,0.000034410703,0.000046196325,0.000023721774,0.00021202165,0.0004649007,0.000051475352,0.00012305756,0.0000069085527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029264903,0.00015151604,0.8941151,0.00000529078,0.000053497213,0.000051075058,0.028712275,0.0006597129,0.00037657516,0.008707013,0.06547459,0.0014007398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066604046,0.00011300905,0.42578936,0.00005001288,0.000043378215,0.00010603024,0.013391665,0.00012246575,0.000100226775,0.00004676997,0.5594413,0.00012969591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03363611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032509644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49396676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006926196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003619917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98514456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206351923","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2021-0062","title":"Private liability without wrongdoing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Plaintiff; Law; Liability; Injustice; Duty; Legal liability; Strict liability; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.017375205652467533,"score_gpt":0.2157921753736549,"score_spread":0.19841696972118736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206351923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.767325,0.00030143763,0.0012909523,0.00043767065,0.00045904727,0.000052754534,0.000010060909,0.00003368383,0.23008943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956364,0.00020913396,0.0020531164,0.000094469324,0.000061236955,8.692857e-9,2.989623e-7,0.0000042006372,0.0019411173],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992148,0.00012664174,0.000104805404,0.00017247746,0.00021281275,0.00016842858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994831,0.000042164582,0.00010563482,0.00017549834,0.00007514376,0.0001184671],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001323987,0.000069494774,0.00013123699,0.0000070455717,0.00043462103,0.000025317599,0.00026304257,0.000037146518,0.0023511515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091117385,0.00007249033,0.000107187385,0.00003266986,0.0001563629,0.0005447923,0.00011867521,0.00013696711,0.000014757134],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022653039,0.00064312795,0.017591618,0.000087800494,0.000052100324,0.0017943193,0.0038526654,0.00017355842,0.7941252,0.16017869,0.0018764515,0.019397952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026286726,0.00026950258,0.025218522,0.00019487774,0.00009319842,0.00094839756,0.0026992138,0.0005971929,0.26058248,0.0047936267,0.7013918,0.00058247946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017031983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067856507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6995154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013998763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056358593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206459726","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0086","title":"Discrimination and the value of lived experience in Sophia Moreau’s <i>Faces of Inequality</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explanatory power; Sketch; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06146223311865459,"score_gpt":0.3144872413944259,"score_spread":0.25302500827577135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206459726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297082,0.00050763856,0.000052883865,0.003468354,0.00008735754,0.00007314737,0.000012593303,0.0000025217657,0.0660873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995816,0.00021494454,0.0000929579,0.000051149284,0.000019578883,7.361865e-8,3.1746723e-7,9.751567e-7,0.000038422964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989005,0.0005109337,0.00012621439,0.000051530224,0.00032079464,0.00009005914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946773,0.0002107884,0.00015418546,0.00005367894,0.00006889098,0.000044709068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010438546,0.00003176836,0.0001223555,0.000012995107,0.0005115383,0.000004933008,0.0002380461,0.000026505671,0.00014801513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009893896,0.00002844888,0.000045593097,0.000034556368,0.0012981322,0.00025052793,0.000094220544,0.00013181994,4.460266e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010421037,0.000042450338,0.0006863816,0.000008276315,0.000006387456,0.0000018934413,0.17371121,0.00004336477,0.000057348854,0.8251949,0.000009576491,0.00013398966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021333136,0.00019955674,0.019517848,0.000060208862,0.000053168562,0.0000044262265,0.7047102,0.00025724203,0.00017081066,0.2685688,0.0041979775,0.00012642631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23026271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04007154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5566261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011122038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006519961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97744465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210304826","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0125","title":"Legal gaslighting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Political science; Normative; Law; Pretext; Function (biology); Context (archaeology); Confusion; Politics; Authoritarianism; Rule of law; Democracy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.010368217863916429,"score_gpt":0.2400624610593805,"score_spread":0.22969424319546408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210304826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06628378,0.00012328585,0.00017568831,0.0004911143,0.00029994256,0.000011936757,0.0000019803729,0.000008510807,0.9326038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96160877,0.000052461182,0.0011111053,0.00005001329,0.00030054935,2.8839793e-9,8.5151055e-7,0.0000016440196,0.03687461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994553,0.000076304015,0.000058973772,0.000056598277,0.00024497282,0.00010786647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995099,0.00002450408,0.00006808048,0.00004002547,0.00028117388,0.00007635448],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001797474,0.000029885026,0.00006360323,0.000005915735,0.0011516163,0.000044274508,0.00016492115,0.000031203104,0.008403374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011427765,0.000033036824,0.00007834239,0.000006953062,0.00012887524,0.000488736,0.000024384643,0.000068406174,0.000013246791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007503793,0.000020019625,0.00004149073,9.5315056e-7,0.000019562523,0.00013676236,0.0031267311,0.0000019521754,0.00006809338,0.9956253,0.00076102494,0.0001906064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021195716,0.000013370679,0.00040245007,0.000019646412,0.000012930177,0.00002308352,0.0043260413,0.0000041247854,0.00014553728,0.011777067,0.9830101,0.000053681466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07521246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5087651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022606381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015440655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210499943","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0038","title":"Chronotopes of security legal regimes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Chronotope; Politics; Function (biology); Political science; Space (punctuation); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.010960562283310509,"score_gpt":0.22814213561783633,"score_spread":0.2171815733345258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210499943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21107706,0.006726862,0.000046988902,0.0005946562,0.00041695175,0.00007697986,0.000025256011,0.000013660621,0.7810216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962962,0.00037318238,0.00013053384,0.000021310254,0.00008505419,3.2550794e-8,4.43642e-7,0.0000019158156,0.0030912817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923617,0.0001624343,0.00008263882,0.00006599399,0.00031633963,0.0001364534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958706,0.000025243158,0.00016059156,0.00006144826,0.000097683376,0.00006799142],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003624465,0.000042244228,0.00013375422,0.00001245588,0.0013573776,0.000009464196,0.00029530426,0.000018892568,0.0011617478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012043675,0.000049846883,0.000100028716,0.000026913785,0.00032154133,0.00034133415,0.00015094482,0.00010244961,0.0000012336772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018910841,0.00025895718,0.013380127,0.000021105321,0.00022965332,0.00008223937,0.0791194,0.000026443848,0.000111334215,0.8857801,0.00646439,0.014337151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004069443,0.00012319062,0.00093301904,0.000009875142,0.000028939152,0.000008655347,0.28043863,0.0000027296492,0.000030289582,0.00089612365,0.71705306,0.000068526235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21944566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29247752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88488394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025708898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111433714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211202533","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0113","title":"Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Harm; Redress; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026247015115743136,"score_gpt":0.1927512163600884,"score_spread":0.16650420124434528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211202533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092203185,0.00033142656,0.0027343181,0.004868374,0.00037206433,0.00008372474,0.000016023074,0.00006832804,0.89932257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802494,0.00007669949,0.00066358474,0.00052605115,0.00008572951,3.4388976e-9,1.09663056e-7,0.000002600401,0.000620271],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999596,0.000035326757,0.000059478647,0.000092243135,0.000118161726,0.00009880354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969625,0.000017018208,0.000067993235,0.000053085165,0.0000204723,0.00014519966],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000031619795,0.000044243592,0.00007748571,0.0000038710723,0.00023957994,0.000011626686,0.00027576266,0.00002063918,0.0030214489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021865972,0.00004535279,0.00006935162,0.000018176137,0.00008737452,0.00038987095,0.000054440487,0.00008342581,0.00004034676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045078047,0.00032666457,0.0013741842,0.00006394822,0.00005879544,0.0017193501,0.023858825,0.000309397,0.5347478,0.3534582,0.03666378,0.046968278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008150032,0.00022509827,0.0008897853,0.0000149967445,0.00001933107,0.0000697595,0.0011157277,0.0005927077,0.016930167,0.00035161673,0.97882825,0.0001475762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016896495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093057763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9421644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068109744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003848788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213358528","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0011","title":"Index to Volume 60","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.013791657626865348,"score_gpt":0.17057936720903633,"score_spread":0.15678770958217098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213358528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07243627,0.00018222145,0.000866786,0.0003214621,0.0026060326,0.000050869356,0.00009948693,0.00001098184,0.9234259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921581,0.00006877456,0.0017621943,0.00009836289,0.000116008145,3.5783437e-8,7.009329e-7,0.0000050368944,0.1057908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994714,0.0000036386903,0.00016593956,0.00016222289,0.000027425433,0.00016936174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994734,0.0000077584655,0.00017432586,0.00015550456,0.000045186986,0.00014385462],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003186902,0.00006446438,0.00020164803,0.00004056219,0.00030707777,0.000038250277,0.00031770527,0.000049205217,0.041727964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001850119,0.000084279905,0.00010535644,0.000024763604,0.0001107457,0.00040131313,0.00010967412,0.00011858108,0.0029587196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008249521,0.00013370394,0.03940163,0.000009342415,0.0002117635,0.000035983972,0.0056927167,0.00013145494,0.000101950005,0.5202427,0.43158108,0.0023751985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035443297,0.000031211064,0.01583558,0.0000034180532,0.00000444551,0.0000074644045,0.0017199866,0.00015412568,0.0000054594275,0.0011333136,0.98064095,0.00010961302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015631182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020302974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8197218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010809423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001072465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214568452","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.151","title":"Book Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0114450027348881,"score_gpt":0.22306126153045783,"score_spread":0.21161625879556972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214568452","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002438774,0.74725133,0.0000923743,0.0003076187,0.00017791156,0.00007936067,0.000012858975,0.00002705194,0.25180763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18265463,0.71877396,0.01273252,0.020430377,0.0019794554,1.232073e-7,0.00002354993,0.00018504937,0.06322033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991437,0.000119381424,0.000121316996,0.000064943335,0.0002786769,0.0002719456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914825,0.000017763661,0.00023435839,0.00016922792,0.00013678275,0.0002936181],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004951765,0.000087001885,0.00021117053,0.000011465327,0.00028439044,0.0000064411665,0.0002957456,0.000037978825,0.045130208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014763931,0.00009308141,0.00016662812,0.000021034111,0.00011153957,0.0017969733,0.00006954155,0.00013290627,0.00081410573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034844856,0.000090302194,0.0003176709,0.00007547136,0.0000674047,0.00001562901,0.00041296842,5.838789e-7,0.00022095299,0.0031842869,0.9947899,0.00078997767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038858823,0.000033064523,0.0012618563,0.00043219086,0.00013623119,0.00017436448,0.00027313386,0.0000014200373,0.000045585046,0.0000064108563,0.99714714,0.00009998821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046675787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031997608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1885873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004998654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002921544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214589949","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0006","title":"Editor’s Note","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0050501246256619186,"score_gpt":0.19391079293196778,"score_spread":0.18886066830630585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214589949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08069921,0.0008728917,0.0034782959,0.0008348645,0.008138345,0.00035372947,0.00006325109,0.00018585291,0.9053736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840901,0.00007578385,0.009711965,0.000052550327,0.003175313,2.7173833e-8,0.0000026128853,0.00002809768,0.0028635643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991019,0.00007303485,0.00011686734,0.00010965561,0.00035507584,0.00024345973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898595,0.000028888177,0.00020747291,0.00017719014,0.00034949795,0.00025100977],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018262448,0.000099340104,0.0001652396,0.000021489346,0.0004019803,0.000037962523,0.00042218258,0.00007593985,0.018728476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014336309,0.00010907409,0.00013890707,0.000022245471,0.0001795747,0.0016062257,0.00008816662,0.00017781221,0.0020777131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010847336,0.00016397923,0.0006037511,0.000009397309,0.00012715001,0.000058828286,0.002170593,0.0000914899,0.010021717,0.006351715,0.9772997,0.0029931904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013914607,0.00013814065,0.008097488,0.000038818027,0.000063541505,0.000085739724,0.0030186768,0.00033738994,0.00026138645,0.00043924563,0.985913,0.00021513272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11846159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060681224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9033909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063647033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005246729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220808168","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0113","title":"Flexibility, choice, and labour law: The challenge of on-demand platforms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Compensation (psychology); Phenomenon; Labour law; Independent contractor; Business; Labour economics; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.01775278847469003,"score_gpt":0.23653833117302303,"score_spread":0.218785542698333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220808168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26672813,0.00028199452,0.000024837007,0.0014945563,0.00010588154,0.00008742127,0.00002312414,0.00000638162,0.73124766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990709,0.00033396765,0.000022404884,0.000069462716,0.000033353375,5.374805e-8,7.5036087e-7,0.0000013589578,0.00046774486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951446,0.00004734911,0.000091878945,0.000055798362,0.00019435842,0.00009614746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996713,0.00006491493,0.00010897534,0.00006193305,0.000038146576,0.000054751825],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005990222,0.000038241647,0.000088230016,0.000008624108,0.0013830917,0.00002139204,0.0002160561,0.000022770058,0.0010121057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000591283,0.00003332742,0.000053976073,0.000019492083,0.00029723026,0.0007400158,0.000046615558,0.00010898341,8.82414e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000471562,0.000060630744,0.0003011005,0.0000069367693,0.000024386109,0.0000011856794,0.016911285,0.000080643105,7.6443604e-7,0.9774663,0.0001212089,0.0049784277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091611315,0.00040302562,0.003996338,0.000022856631,0.000023783115,0.000004412369,0.056841217,0.000028474446,0.0000109919165,0.048649963,0.88899255,0.0001102669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028643593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14052552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012977375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003685434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221090915","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0096","title":"The reinvention of Canadian tort law, 1945–95: <i>Jordan House</i> as case study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Pleading; Law; Plaintiff; Lawsuit; Redress; Political science; Tort reform; Doctrine; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.026942741274139426,"score_gpt":0.26372171234855196,"score_spread":0.23677897107441254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221090915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81519455,0.0006796033,0.0000038108724,0.0017762017,0.00054169516,0.00022163417,0.000013031463,0.000015107367,0.18155438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817485,0.00025963376,0.000037455782,0.000053885047,0.00006271831,1.2179135e-7,2.9120147e-7,0.000004324898,0.0014067463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987229,0.0003778494,0.00013257923,0.000093989824,0.0004619792,0.00021070526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992704,0.000066413355,0.00017120858,0.00013297703,0.00013716723,0.00022182737],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012059431,0.000054693646,0.00010893007,0.000022786526,0.0058381376,0.00003657047,0.0004358414,0.000023553304,0.0010757222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002128352,0.000055891822,0.00010421603,0.000079594865,0.00031379974,0.00036179254,0.00008454354,0.00014987857,0.0000023895966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035729288,0.00045969823,0.004339731,0.000014176262,0.00022607477,0.00916495,0.17651357,0.00014422757,0.00006221336,0.7706552,0.03322485,0.0048379814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002054692,0.00026715314,0.00017499097,0.0000067849064,0.00005570811,0.00025180043,0.3781836,0.0000025088448,0.000003962536,0.00033887048,0.6204527,0.00005644657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77031636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007201511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003656846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223498131","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0085","title":"Frontiers of legality: Understanding the public policy exception in choice of law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Public law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Comparative law; Doctrine; Philosophy of law; Common law; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.0494973636357639,"score_gpt":0.286267658032464,"score_spread":0.2367702943967001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223498131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34024146,0.0012110213,0.004841051,0.015007397,0.0009491208,0.000279554,0.000039158,0.000019930038,0.6374113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934256,0.00017793114,0.00005147789,0.00003550457,0.00008078952,4.3178005e-8,7.990562e-7,0.0000021398657,0.00030872907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894994,0.00031229152,0.00013970793,0.000062980405,0.00039981594,0.00013527859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994855,0.000045617486,0.00026439337,0.000079294216,0.00007178206,0.00005342592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009461248,0.000039740116,0.00012352546,0.000047799116,0.00107971,0.00001686707,0.00029333122,0.000031791697,0.0005965982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021650974,0.000041649157,0.00008214482,0.00010065285,0.0004231035,0.0005362309,0.00007187706,0.00013490678,1.05680904e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055482826,0.00007191518,0.0052342345,0.000005077323,0.00003794846,0.000002279982,0.031997442,0.00006363966,0.00013933281,0.9602567,0.0007928191,0.0013431218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097592536,0.00017975518,0.010299217,0.000016855047,0.00003985937,0.0000039898973,0.25658956,0.00006544586,0.000011875598,0.0075865723,0.72413063,0.0001003477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5680793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60717434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95267016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013416586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018586157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83043647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223521672","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0127","title":"Of linchpins and bedrock: Hope, despair, and pragmatism in animal law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Scholarship; Environmental ethics; Environmental law; Law reform; Bedrock; Animal rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Transformative learning; Pragmatism; Sociology; Property rights; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Welfare; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.0068280068223254935,"score_gpt":0.18287298040866923,"score_spread":0.17604497358634374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223521672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95133966,0.00040646116,0.00002198687,0.0005101331,0.000024113851,0.00006048522,0.000014836837,0.0000029608968,0.04761937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851876,0.00029971925,0.0010182366,0.00008814256,0.0000062931176,4.583324e-8,8.2002003e-7,0.0000032588691,0.000064717766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994075,0.00007172189,0.00010147206,0.00010716653,0.00021137547,0.000100813915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972886,0.00002823078,0.00010053661,0.000065064465,0.0000023649363,0.00007493337],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025698027,0.000059638103,0.00011366587,0.000008635292,0.0003671326,0.0000047954372,0.00013452642,0.000034466342,0.0017079391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027381457,0.00007031234,0.00002613615,0.000020411077,0.0004639373,0.00037591808,0.00042484925,0.0002021672,9.667225e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019222692,0.0020929684,0.40182352,0.00019919305,0.00017968494,0.00073609344,0.053495202,0.006198131,0.06973415,0.44911084,0.0017510823,0.012756877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055923457,0.003076713,0.8426459,0.00010914118,0.00012867338,0.00059385324,0.020436564,0.0009649489,0.0013001414,0.018939855,0.10549344,0.000718412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026274579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04519746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4408224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020387208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000458609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229616329","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.197","title":"THE FRENCH RESPONSE TO THE WORLD BANK'S <i>DOING BUSINESS</i> REPORTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Resistance (ecology); Comparative law; Legal realism; Sociocultural evolution; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Commercial law","score_opus":0.009359559792998856,"score_gpt":0.17810038901662656,"score_spread":0.1687408292236277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229616329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32833868,0.0020480857,0.0014393228,0.010588136,0.008050213,0.00036602543,0.000059579303,0.000032150176,0.64907783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933886,0.00016976854,0.00048600405,0.00021466459,0.00053796294,2.312506e-7,7.9992117e-7,0.0000114079285,0.005190585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989829,0.00004458331,0.0004570085,0.00020225653,0.000054298947,0.00025895255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850607,0.00012978366,0.0006680902,0.00044108002,0.00011610382,0.00013884506],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023194645,0.000092048766,0.00026801272,0.00003756379,0.0013279198,0.00014599542,0.000517921,0.000063874126,0.000878022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011273438,0.00009056713,0.00014592696,0.000078233235,0.00021982448,0.00039982327,0.00011271592,0.00023163276,0.0000873511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009632958,0.00020316229,0.03697172,0.00002606171,0.0005030353,0.00027408387,0.008829174,0.0005589378,0.0006863859,0.78047085,0.16254994,0.007963357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023432789,0.000027824335,0.031908065,0.0000137627785,0.000008038676,0.00007751614,0.00044950732,0.00003177165,0.000015258013,0.0038151112,0.96329284,0.00012596294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0695043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5271356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8007429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021567405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005114398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229847917","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0009","title":"Nazi Law and the Concept of Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023156464497248955,"score_gpt":0.2512282348904293,"score_spread":0.22807177039318033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229847917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16649437,0.00035602038,0.0000486307,0.00027105765,0.000050872473,0.00002975533,0.000005506226,0.0000039623483,0.83273983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989585,0.00029245456,0.00007878052,0.00022869356,0.0000309477,5.4482334e-9,1.8184708e-7,8.523354e-7,0.0004095286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886256,0.0008164326,0.00006617965,0.000023965908,0.00012016297,0.00011071021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993251,0.000361553,0.00007791534,0.00007567748,0.00007988751,0.000079888174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006479272,0.000031971045,0.00012854129,0.0000029430928,0.0022091616,0.0000033732501,0.00023191015,0.000056935052,0.0007175567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005089866,0.000025867539,0.00006188054,0.000009676938,0.0070732697,0.00019474729,0.000056860063,0.00018310038,8.347839e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000692944,0.000022626202,0.00007722059,8.861992e-7,0.000023814797,0.0000037737634,0.023985604,7.647449e-7,0.0000011755488,0.97563404,0.00010110607,0.00007968891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004951179,0.00021139547,0.010349272,0.000032587675,0.00010376599,0.000093058195,0.1890083,0.000009829652,0.00015178246,0.687332,0.10758507,0.00017178629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2067977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054285116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83246416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053383123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004392739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230044696","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020415r","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Legislation; Legislature; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.019827583048009672,"score_gpt":0.2606447722653794,"score_spread":0.24081718921736975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230044696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025481691,0.34595844,0.000028977507,0.0048086066,0.0001767415,0.000044721353,0.0000015284327,0.000012242785,0.64894325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005624184,0.828444,0.0020316665,0.017572328,0.000771386,4.6894368e-8,0.0000024252574,0.0000076068145,0.14554636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936986,0.00011823526,0.000058848327,0.000049319457,0.00029000724,0.00011372966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994253,0.000010416108,0.00008939434,0.00005909947,0.00021709932,0.00019871212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048644465,0.000036291665,0.00010149586,6.4075897e-7,0.0005821798,0.00001254463,0.00025504956,0.000055040986,0.007292516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025510435,0.00003549034,0.00010518443,0.000018865276,0.00024476004,0.0005650824,0.0000253211,0.00008722234,0.00002097098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053587582,0.000015295615,0.000014052661,0.00001195722,0.000015634283,0.000008648845,0.012323097,5.0267465e-7,0.0000013098304,0.028913563,0.9581835,0.00050705933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018633174,0.000020166504,0.000011347548,0.0001312626,0.000029329456,0.0000050839567,0.018551221,2.8011652e-7,0.0000014376805,0.00026386537,0.9807542,0.00004548893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018888624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03484953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5033969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027897325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012598443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230155788","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.219","title":"ABUSE OF JOINT DOMINANCE IN CANADIAN COMPETITION POLICY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Oligopoly; Competition law; Industrial organization; Predatory pricing; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Monopoly","score_opus":0.010254059207268192,"score_gpt":0.18231725752718989,"score_spread":0.1720631983199217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230155788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.473387,0.00032713095,0.00052774476,0.00053240574,0.0002661472,0.000042106134,0.000078249504,0.0000033848166,0.5248358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848986,0.00040771277,0.000685379,0.00004545642,0.00004298329,2.5701567e-8,0.0000023589532,0.0000028454228,0.00032336713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994987,0.0000112928465,0.00023427088,0.000086506945,0.000028618608,0.00014059032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943495,0.0000057696734,0.00024503167,0.0001217579,0.000052479132,0.00014002355],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002657472,0.000049299546,0.00021942997,0.00016254437,0.00009756307,0.000008834482,0.0001596696,0.000049359485,0.003836241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013823167,0.000067381014,0.000111781716,0.00006714129,0.00007356054,0.0002243834,0.000010375193,0.00012284635,0.00002389337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009120209,0.00004666751,0.009871636,0.0000058841315,0.000019423349,0.000005927838,0.0008305593,0.000034225457,0.00013607032,0.98878634,0.00013112518,0.00012299263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002976728,0.00012737933,0.4257134,0.000100768164,0.000028987757,0.000054349875,0.0026706015,0.0022751195,0.00034779534,0.031848356,0.5333607,0.0004958278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9218715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024046999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006555441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99707437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230840024","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.01","title":"Errors of Fact and Law: Race, Space, and Hockey in <i>Christie v York</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Dissent; Law; Economic Justice; Space (punctuation); Race (biology); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Gender studies; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011768011800210797,"score_gpt":0.23144332909019,"score_spread":0.2196753172899792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230840024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58536077,0.011087542,0.000014585306,0.0006528134,0.00020193163,0.000112903836,0.000012726801,0.000013003009,0.40254372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369806,0.0045742653,0.0009872545,0.000039243187,0.0000697041,1.9953887e-8,4.1517205e-7,0.0000022827248,0.000628754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938226,0.00010285679,0.00008081792,0.00006398937,0.0001873272,0.00018272673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995844,0.000038032907,0.00012019247,0.00004693443,0.00005168844,0.00015875576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003464052,0.00005863194,0.00015401917,0.0000033713961,0.0005044993,0.000016972725,0.0001185328,0.00010827398,0.00031552993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011055453,0.00005847159,0.000052323077,0.000027818314,0.0006451847,0.000759754,0.000042895976,0.00012583332,5.9663404e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013252502,0.00029362162,0.06769348,0.000050185816,0.00010322601,0.000013291889,0.3027457,0.0000063229513,0.00032873818,0.61293906,0.01214005,0.003553796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010076216,0.00007908212,0.014952446,0.00009498276,0.000052692274,0.000010606247,0.28438288,0.0000033309595,0.00006900282,0.00093835633,0.69824994,0.00015904364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11820122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2841443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6861099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010420123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029374989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88767076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231199517","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.153","title":"LEGITIMATING PUBLIC POLICY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Public policy; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Policy making; Democratic legitimacy; Policy analysis; Position (finance); Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.049899822072171154,"score_gpt":0.28419272028929593,"score_spread":0.2342928982171248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231199517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063113324,0.0003993111,0.00051705795,0.006348528,0.00013972732,0.000042247255,0.0000020215045,0.000026495361,0.9294113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951168,0.00070901425,0.0016503504,0.00006529524,0.00028600227,8.049367e-9,2.2783306e-7,0.0000021767512,0.0021701385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927014,0.000092507085,0.00007667613,0.00006324804,0.0002893597,0.00020807465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944097,0.0000458688,0.00010480765,0.000063785235,0.00016099706,0.0001835911],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031280896,0.00004247977,0.000091819384,0.000017653325,0.0023103824,0.000028695655,0.000302086,0.000040430998,0.0014906259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009068976,0.000048843984,0.000082301834,0.000038309947,0.00047873636,0.0011615139,0.000039909468,0.000083285355,0.00001388804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028862762,0.00006689439,0.0025925606,0.000008084104,0.000028853525,0.0001532988,0.043483593,0.000007461151,0.00008877822,0.93370944,0.010436279,0.00939587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025520017,0.000051553114,0.0028904951,0.00003126868,0.000012662619,0.00010212165,0.030475026,0.000012480305,0.000011401684,0.0008782175,0.9651743,0.000105275474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42948765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29450658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038378252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032640412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231600438","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0018","title":"Editors' Note","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.006507595387370583,"score_gpt":0.21848238169627268,"score_spread":0.2119747863089021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231600438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07912871,0.0006419314,0.012989195,0.00019949037,0.0052754697,0.00012922288,0.000046328514,0.00012781096,0.90146184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872717,0.000035983216,0.008386803,0.000029691706,0.0030950059,1.9316606e-9,0.0000020438974,0.00002242874,0.0011563395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989701,0.000045934616,0.00014403081,0.00011102409,0.00042418984,0.0003047374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902326,0.00005241127,0.00023244516,0.00016049945,0.0002535845,0.00027782706],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000793925,0.00009847671,0.00016102407,0.000033511995,0.0004518707,0.00001629461,0.00038133626,0.000089550485,0.0031818785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019685258,0.000114135066,0.0001511398,0.0000345005,0.00019217662,0.00081722566,0.00007374497,0.00020636729,0.0002942726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040879087,0.0011478747,0.008467226,0.000048726764,0.0007027535,0.0031010539,0.017746624,0.0002155987,0.071713686,0.06713136,0.79782474,0.027812447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013559206,0.00013123384,0.009856249,0.000032007647,0.0000651453,0.0001524063,0.0030596384,0.000025098629,0.001188961,0.0001479995,0.98381394,0.00017140436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0322791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15024193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.908143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052102987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99772936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231632637","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.185","title":"REPRESENTING INDIGENOUS SELF-DETERMINATION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Opposition (politics); Indigenous rights; Legislature; Political science; Political economy; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Self-determination; Law","score_opus":0.013262252575638518,"score_gpt":0.25375521245036986,"score_spread":0.24049295987473135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231632637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46042508,0.00022157494,0.00013155375,0.000049822404,0.0003520581,0.000109036606,0.0000010087483,0.000028778824,0.5386811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743376,0.012554575,0.0031248634,0.000008803439,0.00049722265,9.3168735e-9,0.0000015741871,0.0000049330033,0.009470467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990677,0.00018725317,0.00011596051,0.00008937299,0.000296792,0.00024288835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992497,0.000041284373,0.00021007813,0.000085209336,0.00027128044,0.00014243419],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005026574,0.000049008937,0.000097224474,0.00002573064,0.016473759,0.00001599316,0.0002298421,0.00007912292,0.0005012615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027143417,0.00005252018,0.00006638997,0.000035610403,0.00019219714,0.0006556684,0.0000018055017,0.00009964894,0.000010534318],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010509553,0.00011731473,0.0017847461,0.00000860944,0.000016787231,0.000043331587,0.96900576,0.0000022266045,0.0000027204283,0.028350813,0.00009924329,0.0005579149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025258455,0.00005289429,0.0037949032,0.000017431385,0.000019578949,0.00006860456,0.03671585,0.0000075768253,0.00003494128,0.00021081831,0.95872813,0.00009665912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7508659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000638335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002575289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98480666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231885791","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4263","title":"‘Writing separately’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Law; Concurrence; Variety (cybernetics); First amendment; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.04536705882565019,"score_gpt":0.3641999661543541,"score_spread":0.31883290732870395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231885791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016427958,0.00005732467,0.000109072644,0.014017218,0.00037059502,0.000022620614,0.00000144258,0.0000075063485,0.9689863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99159235,0.00012204297,0.0012833382,0.000080927086,0.00020796004,7.0529182e-9,2.9501658e-7,0.0000013024389,0.00671176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959975,0.00006389742,0.0000595597,0.00004134588,0.0001442116,0.000091253416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999297,0.00003901029,0.00024841636,0.00010175245,0.00023889866,0.00007490594],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005012048,0.000024812178,0.00004871472,0.000007012505,0.0047199884,0.0002150552,0.00032389167,0.00003298272,0.0040416704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015139882,0.000029747453,0.000035845896,0.000009532691,0.00024024073,0.0022991728,0.000024573734,0.00014072903,0.000020660616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017629773,0.00004740167,0.0023783364,0.0000020211967,0.000020898638,0.000010949153,0.024135346,0.0000018061556,0.000057785477,0.9523371,0.013993884,0.0069968808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014687044,0.000009108204,0.005787109,0.0000074760655,0.000010163964,0.0000036674585,0.03353925,0.0000035264763,0.000009963418,0.00070072187,0.95974267,0.000039473707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3125506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3448733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014533615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026488796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232098802","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.855","title":"EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY CANADIAN MEDICAL PATENT LAW IN PRACTICE: JAMES BERTRAM COLLIP AND THE DISCOVERY OF EMMENIN","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Medical History and Innovations","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Futures studies; Commercialization; Negotiation; Legislation; Law; Political science; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.013114811937105463,"score_gpt":0.19823958666533387,"score_spread":0.18512477472822841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232098802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36246875,0.0010263188,0.000015016845,0.009284474,0.0016647927,0.00017659628,0.00006539776,0.0000060683333,0.6252926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997731,0.00025718057,0.000076411096,0.0005550922,0.00013440556,9.158873e-8,0.0000030288074,0.0000029864086,0.001239824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992545,0.0000907745,0.00017215207,0.00006676462,0.0002902098,0.00012559036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993426,0.00011776632,0.00014582092,0.00008163099,0.00014466615,0.00016750644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005833322,0.000057452075,0.00014245263,0.000025009935,0.00052302476,0.000039233906,0.00018293878,0.00006685591,0.0038677906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008412258,0.000043939755,0.000049517545,0.000012091373,0.0015009603,0.00076301233,0.000029254665,0.0003908656,0.0000015244249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115622344,0.000066847155,0.00010422124,0.000006923053,0.000042896278,0.00003241447,0.027124207,1.887946e-7,0.000006636328,0.96812063,0.003773441,0.0006059461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012585482,0.00006372082,0.0005304535,0.000042526583,0.000038831386,0.000018800974,0.019701311,0.000013569749,0.0000026579585,0.00039339456,0.9778789,0.000057274145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7932031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9692632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9741055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080647456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021436012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99704283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232172700","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.555","title":"THE PARADOX OF RULE OF LAW REFORMS: HOW EARLY REFORMS CAN CREATE OBSTACLES TO FUTURE ONES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Politics; Law reform; Face (sociological concept); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Path dependence; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.010629426809805146,"score_gpt":0.22601544636713128,"score_spread":0.21538601955732614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232172700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63396114,0.0006306213,0.000020622747,0.0067183464,0.00056723703,0.00010480508,0.000039917388,0.000010021445,0.3579473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982989,0.000666661,0.00030700816,0.00002795097,0.00023165159,6.11074e-8,3.8186508e-7,0.0000019180372,0.00046548064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923646,0.00004071138,0.000113322676,0.000071497176,0.0003626508,0.00017534125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923235,0.000039919843,0.00019567506,0.0000954194,0.00032420256,0.00011245047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032807142,0.000065340646,0.00016943864,0.0000107032465,0.0017832115,0.000027036422,0.00039480423,0.00006530956,0.0000751905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023513878,0.00004401035,0.00011137643,0.00003890199,0.0012113337,0.00038363464,0.00007065185,0.00012921126,0.0000010494754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092755894,0.0000290156,0.0011408937,0.0000029099517,0.000068052694,0.0000040370783,0.014277981,0.0000013059773,0.0005067118,0.9808009,0.00017103068,0.002904401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052033743,0.0002436681,0.055072166,0.00007312382,0.00007599143,0.000006027239,0.17783885,5.3393273e-7,0.0006002549,0.029304655,0.73607683,0.00018755619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5258366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9030507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95149624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012837826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013600709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232671323","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.135","title":"THE ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND INDIGENOUS LAW: A CASE STUDY IN ‘LEGAL ASSOCIATION’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Normative; State (computer science); Association (psychology); Political science; Legal research; Legal realism; Legal pluralism; Associative property; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006247602781100124,"score_gpt":0.23525494792052445,"score_spread":0.22900734513942433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232671323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95329714,0.0003699252,0.0000026289893,0.00073100737,0.00008761339,0.00013933447,0.000005388835,0.000004676218,0.045362312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959294,0.0007184931,0.000049147435,0.000042979584,0.00003919988,2.7005276e-8,1.7139226e-7,0.0000011400001,0.0032194403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895555,0.00031754136,0.00012316873,0.000060121787,0.00037735663,0.00016625608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992306,0.0001231879,0.00033637072,0.000044178392,0.00021092607,0.000054714932],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015495926,0.000044117525,0.00011631605,0.0000025843262,0.0015807452,0.000055890905,0.0001386301,0.00007938006,0.000041024003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004130142,0.000039262508,0.00005280642,0.000041502935,0.00007754024,0.00044509282,0.000017026525,0.00015658294,4.4286287e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064603126,0.000415341,0.06380332,0.0000031323088,0.00018491146,0.00035404626,0.89595944,0.000022297787,0.000027042819,0.034924645,0.0012469502,0.0029942675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00191605,0.0003699683,0.0368478,0.000018682804,0.000094020215,0.00003615146,0.8695383,0.000004834516,0.000008931495,0.00235334,0.08867106,0.00014086037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24291363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8852951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6423814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011534124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008448344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232737770","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.811","title":"CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE CRIMINAL LAW: RETHINKING CRIMINAL TRIAL BIFURCATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Punishment (psychology); Certainty; Culpability; Deterrence (psychology); Conviction; Criminal law; Criminology; Law; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sentence","score_opus":0.06492241565591172,"score_gpt":0.23049865253854734,"score_spread":0.16557623688263562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232737770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3705174,0.0006433053,0.0018180385,0.00065978535,0.0012438925,0.0003037794,0.000014813855,0.000035373792,0.6247636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828774,0.00021437084,0.0008351565,0.00025245477,0.00012751653,6.901988e-8,3.6819418e-7,0.0000025926417,0.000279723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919146,0.00018346001,0.00012952343,0.00013057899,0.00023824495,0.00012675454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994865,0.00009783981,0.00016875377,0.00010319625,0.000069290785,0.000074409145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035972492,0.00007448264,0.00011939657,0.00001288515,0.0010126862,0.000029018931,0.00027774306,0.000046475834,0.00070779456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006629701,0.000057464018,0.00008315911,0.000017020624,0.0013722077,0.00057855604,0.000068288115,0.0001610363,0.000004194028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004412119,0.000048185375,0.000006434891,0.0000069998923,0.000007662108,0.00004408067,0.00922892,0.0000011123117,0.00091194664,0.9846294,0.00011497489,0.0005881995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.25975132,0.0035432228,0.0045463867,0.00067006645,0.002584822,0.006641464,0.047536563,0.0013600154,0.037102714,0.48708254,0.14722334,0.0019575646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016476618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005887966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62777036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006323716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048152244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232802946","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.609","title":"Sexual History Evidence in Cases of Sexual Assault: A Critical Re-evaluation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Sexual assault; Sexual history; Scope (computer science); Psychology; Power (physics); Criminology; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Computer science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.15347285082328962,"score_gpt":0.37010928053891573,"score_spread":0.2166364297156261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232802946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8255781,0.025972147,0.0010146735,0.0019063558,0.0024003414,0.00035074473,0.000012402189,0.00004087923,0.14272438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983993,0.00020369195,0.0006416837,0.000029853796,0.00018392163,1.0691194e-7,7.3613234e-7,0.0000028488923,0.0005378646],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983488,0.0004754205,0.00017074942,0.0000934719,0.00069991656,0.00021167003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986177,0.0004625016,0.00015468775,0.00007590684,0.00056554715,0.00012364812],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002070956,0.000064013926,0.00016977213,0.00003497487,0.0003543403,0.000007155618,0.00016632206,0.00008706548,0.0023787473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001004233,0.000072044495,0.000028925495,0.00004731326,0.00046207925,0.0013812642,0.00004224651,0.000117318275,0.0000031828863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006794615,0.0013227329,0.22524497,0.00013711906,0.00020231535,0.00006409432,0.62849164,0.00023231147,0.0012685233,0.07558684,0.045622177,0.021147788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00134323,0.00058635167,0.06432169,0.00017353709,0.00030895273,0.000021908478,0.7789868,0.00030746727,0.00003873735,0.00018296303,0.15336893,0.00035940894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13641317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31120342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17479026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012458113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023786302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233044663","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.41","title":"DEFERENCE, DEFIANCE, AND DOCTRINE: DEFINING THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Statute; Standard of review; Doctrine; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Judicial deference; Substantive due process; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Separation of powers; Legislature; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01872079232334788,"score_gpt":0.26243890550361487,"score_spread":0.24371811318026698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233044663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050796535,0.040119432,0.00004139621,0.0025352712,0.0003785087,0.000108078966,0.000008869246,0.000008840717,0.90600306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95908576,0.04032633,0.00031576285,0.000108885266,0.000093924275,3.766591e-8,2.2165995e-7,9.25982e-7,0.000068127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994504,0.000059280315,0.0000994486,0.00005812648,0.00022287166,0.00010988331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994655,0.0000892615,0.00014942586,0.00004707207,0.00018925744,0.000059461116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004391979,0.000044802087,0.00014386821,0.0000068586974,0.0012373527,0.000009329463,0.00020123862,0.000034753863,0.0002962538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098849676,0.000036068035,0.000061988125,0.000040586532,0.001027653,0.00018836833,0.00004425711,0.00013887105,0.0000022026618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014051142,0.000013281147,0.003395141,0.000010498843,0.000026207084,0.0000027832448,0.0011634221,2.0334095e-7,0.000028551183,0.98655236,0.0010121883,0.007781309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047397034,0.00008087798,0.033477306,0.0005958886,0.00020485054,0.000025835529,0.0086556,9.543232e-7,0.000020935564,0.016251799,0.9400543,0.00015770897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07444991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47929397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97030056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028192499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012735616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233971825","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.61","title":"THE VERY IDEA OF A JUDGE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Skepticism; Order (exchange); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.009444938411722052,"score_gpt":0.2465539911978685,"score_spread":0.23710905278614644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233971825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21152297,0.00017389217,0.00018444749,0.002795934,0.00027632096,0.00006609685,0.000007597962,0.000008579179,0.78496414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772024,0.00025018436,0.00044673932,0.000013466944,0.00008898875,1.4246517e-8,1.2714011e-7,0.0000011420093,0.001479107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996344,0.000032808006,0.000060337687,0.000034936747,0.00015060982,0.00008691282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995706,0.000062260275,0.00010540744,0.000086408574,0.000110900626,0.000064435546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003580421,0.00002291503,0.000049553128,0.0000032840999,0.0011852741,0.000018290575,0.00033034149,0.000032472897,0.00044951565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002122287,0.00001920187,0.00006292556,0.00001677567,0.0003853793,0.0001984115,0.000035836205,0.0001071402,0.0000035759122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011288102,0.000022048363,0.0003505399,9.4839874e-7,0.0000130570625,0.0000010262936,0.0038574664,0.0000012762497,0.0010383333,0.9897415,0.0015070146,0.0034555234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118736665,0.000012198215,0.0033872607,0.0000030695837,0.000010624975,0.0000013877842,0.008141988,0.0000058723213,0.000070401315,0.0017403874,0.986481,0.000027042635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120543376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5908464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045866167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000873832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91162896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234508442","doi":"10.3138/utlj020614-03ra","title":"LIST AND PETTIT ON GROUP AGENCY AND GROUP RESPONSIBILITY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.02383678178646964,"score_gpt":0.20909330993204833,"score_spread":0.1852565281455787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234508442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6897718,0.0006726169,0.00023546387,0.0011220159,0.00043884612,0.00009373223,0.000022453693,0.000026377758,0.30761674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691373,0.0002225543,0.00020940317,0.000108276574,0.000227819,2.0137827e-8,0.000002710438,0.0000037775328,0.0023116807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994441,0.00012250173,0.00009478244,0.00012440849,0.00012309322,0.000091081005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952024,0.000095610616,0.000101563186,0.00011224911,0.00008592188,0.00008438363],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054194446,0.00006668637,0.00011076626,0.000017662069,0.0008545837,0.000067651374,0.00008887221,0.0000429104,0.0010615401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003174629,0.000066373395,0.00003804001,0.000003301671,0.0004593467,0.0004454575,0.000031109077,0.00013930353,0.0000032511548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019107929,0.00006346491,0.00031855548,0.000033450557,0.000019018744,0.0000037477853,0.027034648,2.865304e-7,0.00015282055,0.9647255,0.0010952001,0.006362258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009810284,0.00053035014,0.049292125,0.000082837636,0.00008108878,0.000016685677,0.015263168,0.00008685522,0.000011762839,0.0138005,0.9196505,0.0002030908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016957412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17416082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.950925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057645062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000078048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234579946","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.737","title":"POLICING MORALITY: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND THE CRIMINALIZATION OF INCEST","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Constitutional court; Law; Supreme court; Political science; German; Context (archaeology); Morality; Criminology; Sociology; Constitution; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.04781127884243131,"score_gpt":0.2756272408217971,"score_spread":0.22781596197936582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234579946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063296616,0.0002431665,0.00047356877,0.00064444554,0.00010553482,0.00006184696,0.000008255066,0.000005796194,0.93516076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990172,0.00025222535,0.00038184688,0.00012908623,0.00007110636,1.2837645e-8,4.578322e-7,9.642363e-7,0.00014713491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994493,0.00015503906,0.00009129812,0.00004465539,0.00016773878,0.000091983165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954826,0.000059532333,0.00014171268,0.000048496368,0.00013444165,0.00006755684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045914995,0.00003784043,0.00010338932,0.000008748017,0.0008615054,0.00001207356,0.00015178886,0.000034898363,0.00050088577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021554159,0.000032139884,0.00004968714,0.000017847984,0.003772392,0.0003444779,0.00003292535,0.00005078663,6.611251e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009715958,0.00001701939,0.00057803956,0.0000059393797,0.000015594218,0.0000022578702,0.03650818,0.0000010123129,0.00001089757,0.9624902,0.00007851727,0.00019519492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054160804,0.0003270507,0.020507306,0.0002940102,0.0007693032,0.0001351382,0.22739813,0.00006680651,0.00046978565,0.09287252,0.65129083,0.0004530378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8116337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5040547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93572056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007253631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009251328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234787365","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.293","title":"On Non-domination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.027096492398328113,"score_gpt":0.28365787032774564,"score_spread":0.2565613779294175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234787365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020640282,0.000061087696,0.0003660744,0.0015747083,0.00030209098,0.000023760827,0.000001902468,0.0000056525414,0.97702444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985671,0.000061903316,0.00023823707,0.00013682518,0.0003226586,4.2268558e-9,2.3774035e-7,0.0000012814671,0.000671754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946016,0.000086461514,0.00004200604,0.000030119027,0.00021434233,0.00016688973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956745,0.00009213636,0.000046789326,0.000038846418,0.00006921629,0.00018556973],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005052232,0.00002853082,0.00005441151,0.000007644596,0.0007005301,0.000008441718,0.00012460435,0.00006374457,0.0010252729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005876782,0.000031072894,0.00005112919,0.000011527323,0.00023440534,0.0005588051,0.000013093042,0.000112501584,0.000025907157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019674137,0.000048605823,0.000080564314,0.0000014130933,0.000006793363,0.0000015044875,0.009996054,0.000001079584,0.000013722992,0.98848766,0.0007844514,0.00055845093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013957074,0.00027326122,0.012015813,0.000090335925,0.00008488292,0.000007694897,0.0383081,0.000024739404,0.00019167316,0.25515285,0.69215006,0.0003048944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029695146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017963171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027772516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003697641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235133096","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.ellickson","title":"THE ENTITLEMENTS OF UNALLIED HUNTERS AFTER A SEQUENTIAL CAPTURE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whaling; Humanism; Animal rights; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Geography; Environmental ethics; Ethnology; Fishery; Political science; Law; Sociology; Archaeology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0070778236559528515,"score_gpt":0.20449883932619814,"score_spread":0.19742101567024528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235133096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115124695,0.0066656056,0.00017403926,0.00092733797,0.002287605,0.00014816677,0.000052071508,0.000011420923,0.87460905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903032,0.0005389593,0.00007620191,0.000026817228,0.00012889903,2.3348264e-8,4.389643e-7,0.000001998031,0.008923437],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999416,0.0000810105,0.00007148199,0.00003391946,0.00023485637,0.00016273068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961066,0.000014460315,0.00011111233,0.000059156875,0.00007168507,0.0001329236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032129657,0.000030019944,0.00006385207,0.000022043649,0.0010356174,0.00004324625,0.00020697371,0.0000384517,0.004840888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007684965,0.00003297656,0.00009464695,0.000017802335,0.0005437346,0.0004139084,0.000025224163,0.00006726198,0.000009120607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007013134,0.00036929993,0.012504027,0.000058961657,0.00076871883,0.00007497728,0.43992198,0.0000082431425,0.00069062295,0.39956293,0.13366184,0.0116770975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001708637,0.000009074327,0.0026157314,0.0000109577595,0.000035886816,0.0000014480617,0.022254128,2.810352e-7,0.0000042494135,0.00004024302,0.9748201,0.00003705026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7860768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98916256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8751785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074348936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014817234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99606884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235229934","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.657","title":"COVENANTS FOR THE SWORD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; SWORD; State (computer science); Political science; Constitutional law; Covenant; Phenomenon; Punishment (psychology); Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Power (physics); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Business; Epistemology; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03918655260594354,"score_gpt":0.2586597190380242,"score_spread":0.21947316643208067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235229934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011764248,0.00034175382,0.0070117936,0.00048595972,0.00030071771,0.000068172856,0.00001756276,0.000006569193,0.99059105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392056,0.00027472328,0.0019895546,0.00011158765,0.00014332506,2.5269614e-8,2.2637319e-7,0.000001279806,0.003558713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996508,0.00003831772,0.0000443796,0.000033801945,0.00011187726,0.000120846016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959296,0.0000995937,0.000071815666,0.000045204964,0.000116889205,0.00007356608],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002252279,0.000026952499,0.0000534162,0.0000030523995,0.0013039446,0.0000074936847,0.00023036363,0.000023438539,0.001458884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021399539,0.000022003565,0.00007060397,0.000009306999,0.0007783742,0.00017933865,0.000014838494,0.000038877864,0.0000029916346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028056173,0.000013734698,0.00022657194,7.1902593e-7,0.000022706403,0.0000023257853,0.0037517976,8.7108646e-7,0.0000017516478,0.9927921,0.0019759643,0.0011833754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014503938,0.000031639473,0.0006518613,0.000005236311,0.000028353606,0.000003137386,0.014696095,0.0000025473935,0.0000049325777,0.0013995301,0.982998,0.000033633416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19305895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16828793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99274415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010571677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030027324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235892352","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.899","title":"THE CONSTITUTION AND THE RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Principle of legality; Excuse; Political science; Acquittal; Self defense; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009736492840438149,"score_gpt":0.20614915803564135,"score_spread":0.1964126651952032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235892352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052933455,0.0002498377,0.00011525974,0.00026275107,0.00017401807,0.00004993733,0.0000017144755,0.000004804356,0.94620824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979454,0.00030322553,0.00025019413,0.000011356413,0.000040166535,1.0780439e-8,5.8331796e-8,4.3747417e-7,0.001449148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995897,0.000102635255,0.00005848608,0.000030922707,0.0001582481,0.00006001324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999594,0.00007661718,0.00011285278,0.000039437444,0.00014783912,0.000029283228],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045887113,0.000023498376,0.00005014842,0.0000036029217,0.0016564982,0.000013542784,0.00022258447,0.00001992948,0.00054782885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008486255,0.000013515439,0.000040534593,0.000004472832,0.0016081502,0.00022315636,0.000019749037,0.00004629238,0.0000014288339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054309796,0.0000101443475,0.000061969564,6.6549194e-7,0.000023813298,0.0000022029817,0.0130602885,1.290468e-7,0.0000018449109,0.98661816,0.0001016516,0.000064831525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001601722,0.00007966164,0.0055329693,0.00004390522,0.00010543049,0.00002416924,0.011564745,0.000026910011,0.00012203161,0.35309026,0.6277063,0.00010187694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066869356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21743728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059280825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005650693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236243580","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.315","title":"FREEING MIGRATION FROM THE STATE: MICHAEL TREBILCOCK ON MIGRATION POLICY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration policy; Opposition (politics); Citizenship; Democracy; Immigration law; Politics; Political science; Political economy; State (computer science); Economics; Law","score_opus":0.007953827998630062,"score_gpt":0.22955567058172005,"score_spread":0.22160184258309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236243580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239779,0.00010857763,0.00011858178,0.04104161,0.00035515107,0.00008980498,0.00027004498,0.000011579934,0.03402671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994963,0.00036165336,0.0002157382,0.0008216936,0.0007797859,2.9885054e-8,0.0000036156885,0.00000332284,0.0028511654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993486,0.00009434078,0.00007895666,0.000080451275,0.00024231063,0.00015534973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994221,0.00010367719,0.00016338084,0.00011118384,0.00007455894,0.00012509781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022336113,0.00005464462,0.00007183187,0.000013140302,0.0010546603,0.00005416903,0.00028836334,0.000060946015,0.0006228948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008932606,0.000050672912,0.00007217471,0.000038354046,0.00021548853,0.0004277485,0.000013725881,0.0001834647,0.000007096468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023956603,0.00011840223,0.00566388,0.0000034807529,0.000101973834,0.000030473291,0.25421655,0.000117324,0.0046012276,0.508404,0.19558696,0.030916138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027450954,0.000035300076,0.023404166,0.000017376718,0.000012910255,0.0000016625715,0.005061883,0.000044959004,0.00012404607,0.0030782414,0.9678677,0.0000772544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77228075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030080395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000242425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8111701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236495455","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.237","title":"THE EVERYDAY PROBLEM OF EMERGENCIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Principle of legality; Mistake; Rule of law; Politics; Law; Empirical research; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012930951744914413,"score_gpt":0.2337491872356998,"score_spread":0.2208182354907854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236495455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014370302,0.0036046375,0.00013503239,0.0035257323,0.00016991285,0.00005603723,0.000002864655,0.000007791148,0.9781277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956146,0.003234753,0.0002814278,0.000021507372,0.00007711428,6.8300303e-9,7.2002074e-8,4.2764677e-7,0.0007701316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949586,0.00005371208,0.000075642725,0.000034646375,0.00023567808,0.00010442757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996031,0.00003400282,0.0001016705,0.000031172665,0.0001890001,0.00004103796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003042945,0.000029806988,0.00007217146,0.000004057783,0.0019585511,0.0000079982365,0.00020615742,0.000021108108,0.00023162091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015581008,0.000023489143,0.000071279195,0.000024732262,0.0005852656,0.0001992419,0.000018358793,0.00004202807,0.0000016238539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002668824,0.000025790974,0.00043844865,5.75906e-7,0.000031054442,0.0000022849467,0.00627246,0.000005575729,0.0000638534,0.98211074,0.0029133162,0.008109218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017312395,0.00010074949,0.012381959,0.000024232391,0.000029916688,0.0000019637305,0.044620782,0.0000010217808,0.000028187293,0.045105543,0.8974697,0.00006282982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11366574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32103515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98124427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092309994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093625866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236913483","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.ziff","title":"THE LAW OF CAPTURE, NEWFOUNDLAND-STYLE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Style (visual arts); Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Possession (linguistics); Corollary; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006093123986782072,"score_gpt":0.18610896164325544,"score_spread":0.18001583765647336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236913483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010015278,0.0014931967,0.000026137168,0.0011854486,0.00034444543,0.0000623862,0.00000578543,0.0000060994,0.9868612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96914333,0.0010638542,0.00014581988,0.00007268426,0.000118942226,2.6703397e-8,3.7746875e-7,0.0000027196254,0.029452274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994771,0.000074489224,0.000071517745,0.000042441738,0.00020587415,0.00012861064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994832,0.000041790976,0.00011728726,0.00007630558,0.00015369183,0.00012769252],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021729317,0.000029494053,0.00007688211,0.000015065953,0.0023367456,0.00010478681,0.0003005529,0.00004418836,0.0039467923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011532727,0.000031161595,0.00008295019,0.000019762143,0.0011701345,0.00048371847,0.000020372365,0.00007793141,0.000021401704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014634528,0.000022861832,0.00018568628,0.0000039924566,0.00004019852,0.0000069867965,0.022668375,0.0000023610223,0.00003813175,0.9271517,0.04738931,0.002475765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014669957,0.000015271047,0.0012727254,0.000007514114,0.000013546415,0.0000022142578,0.02026983,0.0000016786223,7.135124e-7,0.0009821113,0.97725093,0.000036734687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99660087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99965674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.959128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073084654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019015375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237118766","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.241","title":"HUMAN FREEDOM AND TWO FRIEDMEN: MUSINGS ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF GLOBALIZATION FOR THE EFFECTIVE REGULATION OF CORPORATE BEHAVIOUR","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Globalization, Economics, and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Polity; Sovereignty; Politics; Shareholder; Human rights; Political economy; Economics; Market economy; Law and economics; Political science; Corporate governance; Economic system; Law; Management","score_opus":0.03385570397036306,"score_gpt":0.21246495380309774,"score_spread":0.17860924983273468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237118766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96954477,0.0005247628,0.0106897205,0.0006876798,0.00015139888,0.00040521164,0.00035200347,0.000005293486,0.017639136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934554,0.00024214435,0.00024511525,0.000035141253,0.000036684716,3.5973977e-7,0.0000074625796,0.000004099507,0.00008347989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995688,0.000019517054,0.00023527484,0.00008365767,0.00002265552,0.00007007467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871784,0.00006509698,0.00091655256,0.00013715608,0.00013897866,0.00002436583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026376988,0.00005690479,0.00016377856,0.000024696237,0.00054180063,0.000010449249,0.0001494282,0.000035732246,0.00009074045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018560208,0.000053751006,0.00007367726,0.000032223088,0.000274403,0.00019000878,0.000021569665,0.00003141059,6.1734767e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023140297,0.000035662226,0.054622274,0.000005993978,0.00004893023,4.9740127e-8,0.0017301663,0.0011558611,0.00006860032,0.9411088,0.0011496856,0.000050812323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010717041,0.00019267606,0.94476855,0.000020947016,0.000048993134,0.000009901567,0.0009774416,0.0012297127,0.00017796064,0.045749262,0.0056510707,0.00010176687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016497495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008450898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8953596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011406047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011680409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99005175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237137637","doi":"10.2307/825996","title":"Dealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01072058484516884,"score_gpt":0.22477020344622411,"score_spread":0.21404961860105529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237137637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8794072,0.00088871625,0.00005599102,0.00078366743,0.0001343514,0.00015558532,0.000004481244,0.000002542676,0.11856744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99425155,0.0044813077,0.00029161695,0.00001481022,0.00009891451,1.444545e-8,3.3478375e-7,0.0000019978786,0.0008594752],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919164,0.00023558106,0.00010444505,0.00006606473,0.0002674379,0.00013483659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991599,0.00010788617,0.00021111546,0.0000507105,0.00036455406,0.000105888335],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035506362,0.000044033146,0.00009221531,0.000019055877,0.003538299,0.000019528812,0.00013994677,0.000030046562,0.0003122001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000071950644,0.000034524222,0.000013401752,0.000046593897,0.00029376402,0.00066008983,0.0000012212662,0.00012303398,3.1555552e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057505385,0.000027898515,0.0011903627,0.000015719434,0.000027394604,0.000016124071,0.8102794,0.000057368048,0.0000013999605,0.18787149,0.0003884382,0.00006685782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079980044,0.00011412721,0.01573229,0.00014991385,0.000086990265,0.00001098824,0.8123039,0.00003845415,0.000042836553,0.00029346312,0.17029494,0.00013227257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18757802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010798061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045438563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237314774","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.617","title":"THE HABIBI LIBEL TRIAL: DEFAMATION AND THE HIDDEN-COMMUNITY BASIS OF CRIMINAL LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Subversion; Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0366780363691468,"score_gpt":0.24976368039579408,"score_spread":0.2130856440266473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237314774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44880885,0.00015983745,0.000054099393,0.00039943776,0.00021698487,0.00011509026,0.0000033376027,0.0000058085066,0.5502366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790645,0.00016699903,0.00026855466,0.000035383233,0.000079735626,5.838435e-8,3.40837e-7,0.0000018749125,0.0015406288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988728,0.00060958473,0.00012368156,0.000038153186,0.00026276812,0.00009297306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912953,0.0002733042,0.00022174425,0.000097946875,0.00023032473,0.000047152564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014136794,0.00004404317,0.0001005219,0.00000828569,0.003409672,0.00003835109,0.00044869806,0.000039753515,0.00048324544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003013659,0.000028243174,0.00009245742,0.000008603338,0.001471816,0.00041930535,0.000052375803,0.00014371655,0.0000014542079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018962391,0.00004110816,0.000015700482,0.0000024537233,0.00003718448,9.687889e-7,0.0424579,8.700591e-8,0.0000023403297,0.95495135,0.00011425068,0.00048042505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025638508,0.0006499408,0.0094145285,0.00011601847,0.00044213212,0.000018344737,0.11997904,0.000029630959,0.00028597348,0.7265205,0.116647065,0.0002583596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35834977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6299907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5490976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009023571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049906757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237425038","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.799","title":"NEW MODES AND ORDERS: THE DIFFICULTIES OF A <i>JUS POST BELLUM</i> OF CONSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Law; Political science; Constitution; International law; Politics; Municipal law; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Public law; Public international law; Sociology","score_opus":0.006363238006426126,"score_gpt":0.21425249150764336,"score_spread":0.20788925350121723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237425038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8220795,0.000097703465,0.0015194266,0.00091113325,0.00013632965,0.00007589859,0.00003525711,0.000003815738,0.17514095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986572,0.000049365546,0.00069038715,0.000012829926,0.000052820124,7.971926e-9,0.0000015260337,6.4893476e-7,0.000535174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995779,0.000029904186,0.00008839205,0.00003154981,0.00021711992,0.000055172666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995172,0.000042884534,0.00011684168,0.000029197969,0.0002522663,0.00004163253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015994704,0.000032121574,0.00007112532,0.000010545674,0.0005347147,0.000011667418,0.00015010757,0.00003638356,0.0006915606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007550286,0.000024727435,0.00005024692,0.0000066858684,0.0011178277,0.0004192825,0.000009636989,0.000071154405,3.7033416e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004058491,0.000018869849,0.00003757707,0.0000039117517,0.000023305985,4.9234353e-7,0.0126705365,0.000011856275,0.0013598074,0.98548764,0.00010289136,0.00024251227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0084248595,0.000872515,0.026797164,0.00042662641,0.0005514054,0.0001477037,0.19693236,0.0004082774,0.008969964,0.20545587,0.55023193,0.00078129675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09076638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38297224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7800318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028336404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014244945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91528827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237555607","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.155","title":"MICHAEL TREBILCOCK AND THE PAST AND FUTURE OF LAW AND ECONOMICS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Scholarship; Coase theorem; Law; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Transaction cost; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007666033138728695,"score_gpt":0.16043229367241765,"score_spread":0.15276626053368897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237555607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8081397,0.0054230783,0.00003872587,0.0011783763,0.0006473423,0.00011775552,0.00009057934,0.00000431573,0.18436012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992639,0.0064582103,0.00029809147,0.00010427326,0.00038800345,5.7929917e-8,8.7895125e-7,0.000006847026,0.00010461402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940866,0.00001600579,0.00028805123,0.00015346841,0.000013683707,0.000120125274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992294,0.000046167646,0.0004597347,0.00013553038,0.000028355014,0.00010086832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046078739,0.000079994265,0.0003928163,0.000021278864,0.00029806647,0.00004466368,0.00014978241,0.000102247504,0.00014583199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004097343,0.00008950569,0.000072996365,0.000007687655,0.0008180833,0.00038398657,0.0000763336,0.00013591931,0.0000017048635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008134896,0.000014482713,0.008470529,0.000015619025,0.000069872825,9.237486e-7,0.0019924867,0.000001190409,0.000009171186,0.988463,0.00009708263,0.0007842791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008189528,0.00021316069,0.031807233,0.000027678014,0.00008024295,0.00021271603,0.007057758,0.0006681738,0.000025723333,0.1579589,0.7933051,0.0004538152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034037653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08248064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8305041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036984693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008535455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97239476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237582122","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.349","title":"IDEAS, INTERESTS, AND INSTITUTIONS: CONCEDING CITIZENSHIP IN BANGLADESH","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Independence (probability theory); Human settlement; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Human rights; Identity (music); Political science; Urdu; Work (physics); Sociology; Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Gender studies; Political economy; Politics; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.02962039295173821,"score_gpt":0.2833240569912619,"score_spread":0.2537036640395237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237582122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8409771,0.0007367095,0.000124113,0.00066292996,0.0006279204,0.000072181814,0.0000047745893,0.00001770597,0.1567766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966271,0.0010127599,0.0019444453,0.00008898523,0.00015417175,4.0874653e-8,7.226918e-7,0.0000024300773,0.00016936692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993436,0.00006970102,0.000112627255,0.00008981219,0.00017334602,0.0002109122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951416,0.00006880544,0.00008116277,0.000053411,0.000103510974,0.00017897076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005084838,0.000058553796,0.00011519408,0.000020498319,0.00077206816,0.0000444704,0.00019111042,0.000104813465,0.00052504864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008880486,0.00006908581,0.00004688648,0.000029158686,0.0008268545,0.00034327817,0.000053291107,0.00025155052,0.0000025050765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016454009,0.000031678734,0.01630496,0.000010934813,0.00002735298,0.000042602453,0.117310226,0.0000011163588,0.00013156181,0.8617987,0.0035432584,0.00078117143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025360961,0.00007735143,0.13021286,0.00024215192,0.000046967478,0.000055484827,0.5109348,0.00002544972,0.000054736483,0.0336463,0.32171935,0.0004484217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104650624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.507708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82815236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003164919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002255419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9013116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237651009","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.491","title":"THE PERSISTENT DILEMMAS OF DEVELOPMENT: THE NEXT FIFTY YEARS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Politics; Political science; Work (physics); Law and development; Field (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Path dependence; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Development studies; Neoclassical economics; Economics","score_opus":0.021537289022471356,"score_gpt":0.22887168505616956,"score_spread":0.20733439603369822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237651009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7655997,0.00039475394,0.00003594544,0.0014402483,0.000765155,0.00012795127,0.0000019371646,0.000010328188,0.23162392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951908,0.00022803391,0.00091628137,0.000022171644,0.00007790367,3.3471963e-8,2.6894742e-7,0.0000021973638,0.003562308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992517,0.00007437318,0.00011175621,0.000057685247,0.00034733315,0.00015715565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994634,0.0000755849,0.00014493568,0.000099199635,0.00013044251,0.00008647478],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074107427,0.000045257682,0.0000771521,0.0000068403433,0.002372216,0.000050863502,0.0005164989,0.000042103195,0.0016701117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015337377,0.00002781266,0.000098287856,0.000018874898,0.00061153644,0.00021038282,0.00006136032,0.00014582548,0.000007544771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076581906,0.00010236773,0.0010937296,0.00000592828,0.00025223714,0.000021114884,0.30478257,0.000005272303,0.00025289884,0.6321598,0.0076389727,0.05360853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015154679,0.000014943468,0.008856823,0.000008627878,0.000012663689,0.000002631378,0.03171618,0.0000019011798,0.000028101485,0.00034444514,0.95881456,0.000047596415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02024324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43080074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012279453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028599668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238454917","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.fernandez","title":"FUZZY RULES AND CLEAR ENOUGH STANDARDS: THE USES AND ABUSES OF <i>PIERSON V POST</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Law; Style (visual arts); Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Literature; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.014220824814434626,"score_gpt":0.18470277522737175,"score_spread":0.17048195041293712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238454917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85434663,0.02469068,0.00015098458,0.00032455206,0.00038685213,0.000098065226,0.00032478222,0.000006774716,0.119670704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364376,0.0058405604,0.00022696557,0.00006048219,0.00014731109,3.2999015e-8,9.967692e-7,0.000007067966,0.00007283537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994074,0.000025854075,0.0002513187,0.000101572376,0.00004140857,0.0001724243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914074,0.00005104223,0.0005278682,0.00011009003,0.000064672684,0.000105558815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006531119,0.00007224905,0.00030976016,0.00002413653,0.0003198217,0.000033019,0.00014772789,0.00006249913,0.00020551283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002782054,0.000080844184,0.00007613181,0.000012031424,0.00036404407,0.0007155852,0.00005813087,0.00007460309,0.000003803192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018333484,0.000077306795,0.07593602,0.000057726313,0.00021677489,0.0000023979414,0.014048862,0.0000053718522,0.000031754844,0.9065758,0.0013612801,0.0015033821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030992085,0.0007359601,0.13528554,0.00016034009,0.00012172413,0.00015161693,0.039306123,0.000048302707,0.0001378877,0.029407281,0.7909308,0.00061520335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032964926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009652662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87716854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012905408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016023814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9734746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238569443","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.250712","title":"THE OFFICE OF OWNERSHIP&lt;sup&gt;†&lt;/sup&gt;","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01637918581381339,"score_gpt":0.1804790408094979,"score_spread":0.1640998549956845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238569443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09952315,0.0034369193,0.00002465427,0.0025829873,0.00048462377,0.0001345284,0.00003052468,0.000024595322,0.893758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882072,0.00029160464,0.00012313497,0.00010282885,0.00042658034,8.230757e-8,0.0000023865439,0.0000075751677,0.01083861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990924,0.00014750242,0.00020329167,0.00011165701,0.00021177487,0.00023335703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887556,0.00019287424,0.00028550957,0.00021425617,0.0003207999,0.00011101206],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030760092,0.00012746092,0.00022649142,0.000021353842,0.0013467284,0.000054608812,0.0005672308,0.00007911868,0.017138368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001949398,0.0000956934,0.00020727806,0.000009106247,0.0011055635,0.0006546126,0.0000787329,0.00020369829,0.00009488657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018758826,0.0000842918,0.000051002335,0.000014095241,0.00026738935,0.000009021527,0.015869569,0.000019706395,0.000097269345,0.96129054,0.02026233,0.0018471736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007683797,0.00028624194,0.00068700337,0.00005390189,0.0001286676,0.000024792478,0.011077913,0.000048866852,0.00003536699,0.01832226,0.9683919,0.0001747147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008750824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94812953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006188294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039353243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238681007","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.279","title":"PRIVATE LAW AND KANTIAN RIGHT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Normative; Categorical imperative; Autonomy; Law; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Kantian ethics; Philosophy; Public law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01993033948230251,"score_gpt":0.18697039109619312,"score_spread":0.16704005161389063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238681007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22377689,0.00021549127,0.0002283855,0.00009168832,0.00023378983,0.000046839246,0.000007585931,0.00002117713,0.77537817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785244,0.00024539643,0.0010924236,0.0001517211,0.000029800034,5.3066564e-9,9.400273e-8,0.0000033247625,0.0006247804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999519,0.00004596957,0.000069568014,0.00011335315,0.00011705363,0.00013506718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967057,0.000012811592,0.0000829998,0.00009407163,0.000021594074,0.000117980075],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006669765,0.00006121646,0.00009048431,0.000008986266,0.0004320698,0.000013043131,0.00023558922,0.000032616972,0.0022764634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000063983075,0.0000568416,0.000047306497,0.00001401906,0.00028530974,0.0005704109,0.000073442134,0.000084988096,0.00001121988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008696529,0.00010990811,0.0005762779,0.000011846387,0.000014425736,0.00046467935,0.002803305,5.048108e-7,0.03822205,0.9557953,0.0005651381,0.0013496291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030040052,0.00075077405,0.01933178,0.00014545894,0.00012036043,0.0011002085,0.0014384054,0.00011237667,0.16681816,0.020993713,0.78552777,0.0006570105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011296063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01609801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030869338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000080192785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238894806","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.687","title":"CONSUMER CREDIT REDUX","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Government (linguistics); Economic interventionism; Economics; Political science; Consumer protection; Law and economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.011608491887110479,"score_gpt":0.24810062710047245,"score_spread":0.236492135213362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238894806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07377305,0.00009588942,0.000048941893,0.00051307125,0.000792186,0.000024834553,0.0000044603835,0.000012096207,0.9247355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873411,0.000255428,0.0007728283,0.00008719559,0.00036187866,3.683128e-9,5.3034404e-7,0.0000026977837,0.011178311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947876,0.00006448462,0.00006478012,0.000054185053,0.00022926745,0.00010854597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994646,0.000038414768,0.00009190757,0.00005852037,0.00021535656,0.00013122534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033492572,0.000035073615,0.00006246175,0.0000082981605,0.00058811874,0.00003187476,0.00030015118,0.000040973035,0.010804805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053525713,0.00003870736,0.00006650076,0.000009769429,0.00035324326,0.0005056568,0.000022700215,0.00016970509,0.00003913355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028134838,0.000031528103,0.00039894046,7.1779044e-7,0.000026387297,0.000028853738,0.0018414512,4.789774e-7,0.0012161628,0.9877844,0.0071348906,0.0015080819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022735527,0.000018872508,0.0018798627,0.0000062599493,0.000010272626,0.0000058815913,0.0015304309,0.0000044765543,0.000039278457,0.00031855583,0.99591213,0.000046627243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043573916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28640816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007400173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007873617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99009943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239043492","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.417","title":"DIGNITY, LIBERTY, EQUALITY: A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TRIANGLE OF CONSTITUTIONALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Constitutionalism; Politics; Ideology; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Law; Liberalism; Bill of rights; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Democracy","score_opus":0.028095736643470138,"score_gpt":0.2739936088723604,"score_spread":0.24589787222889026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239043492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043167215,0.0010971829,0.0003312812,0.0016245825,0.00027722356,0.000090511305,0.00003505972,0.00001617095,0.9533608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987462,0.000257604,0.0003190743,0.0000813911,0.00014958196,1.600025e-8,0.0000015752522,6.804985e-7,0.00044386802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908966,0.0001223651,0.00015100848,0.00007830884,0.00040854883,0.00015011532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939877,0.00005839572,0.00017729275,0.000047120076,0.00020761346,0.00011079055],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003724196,0.000061490566,0.00019803672,0.000016705424,0.0015356172,0.000016609285,0.00021506786,0.000053683,0.0010371659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022469816,0.0000614338,0.0001512005,0.000039847906,0.0012655545,0.0004386308,0.000037230013,0.00007317128,0.000005193826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073627496,0.00014014047,0.00040768247,0.0000013090605,0.000059479797,0.000014118536,0.003673981,0.0000020733507,0.00006987721,0.9934561,0.0009948935,0.001106685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018958288,0.00026919483,0.009167292,0.00011842253,0.00013375735,0.000020459924,0.016247254,0.00000203875,0.00010893456,0.22465317,0.7471506,0.00023302699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2488299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22908024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028000955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021492575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239310495","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.131212","title":"INTRODUCTION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.00502274955518309,"score_gpt":0.17294804547788886,"score_spread":0.16792529592270578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239310495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48934713,0.00075350766,0.0015049606,0.0032299433,0.0011770072,0.0002603008,0.000015738387,0.00013597966,0.50357544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915892,0.000059000307,0.0043863025,0.000018664894,0.0006263819,1.3958979e-8,0.0000022052786,0.000012630676,0.0033056175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994144,0.000062205734,0.00008517565,0.00009153821,0.00019834674,0.00014831954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930686,0.000008663524,0.00015259342,0.0001337322,0.00027142823,0.00012672493],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015580209,0.0000629049,0.00010752371,0.000018066652,0.00030375546,0.000024897949,0.00020841647,0.00003912417,0.038220216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010743286,0.000069892376,0.00008016541,0.000021011667,0.00012551738,0.0015215008,0.000041815012,0.00011175999,0.0016458167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019100758,0.00024993208,0.0011710277,0.000012154791,0.0002344132,0.000033185755,0.0028473528,0.00016670383,0.04944177,0.049813263,0.8836579,0.012181322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011522002,0.00015808486,0.017309245,0.000014649771,0.00006500636,0.00023825897,0.006821372,0.00016242023,0.00077591103,0.0007568061,0.9723671,0.00017893931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067519076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029992353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.502242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047396874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020315538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239877486","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0067","title":"Editors' Note","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.004713475738712176,"score_gpt":0.2042997986697399,"score_spread":0.19958632293102774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239877486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28207323,0.00017074094,0.00096682535,0.0004872003,0.013246241,0.0001415415,0.00009272778,0.00014545285,0.70267606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986861,0.00001852916,0.008560828,0.000020222999,0.0035074232,5.629551e-9,0.0000020411078,0.000021133872,0.0010088305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915576,0.00004743012,0.00010735313,0.000113519,0.00035204092,0.00022387088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990381,0.00003312411,0.00020675636,0.00021128193,0.00025697207,0.00025376177],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003328146,0.00009709589,0.00015561827,0.00002305682,0.00047883086,0.000025121604,0.0004738216,0.00010994382,0.008250207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027874881,0.000109383356,0.00014657725,0.000023179007,0.00025354573,0.0009201954,0.00008532769,0.0004269442,0.00040948528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084230903,0.0005984304,0.0038213897,0.000021837615,0.00030083966,0.0005353745,0.0067472947,0.000051681396,0.3472987,0.062232245,0.56930584,0.008244043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010606769,0.000078669196,0.0044380934,0.000013814011,0.000056276014,0.0001510864,0.0008532236,0.00006319079,0.0010730067,0.00022137088,0.99184066,0.0001499039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033496723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23322129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70478773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002460908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007396938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239968141","doi":"10.3138/utlj.57.4.795","title":"THE SCOPE AND STRUCTURE OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Economic and Industrial Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Restitution; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.013893773278130768,"score_gpt":0.17752538886686214,"score_spread":0.16363161558873138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239968141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6074345,0.014126339,0.0016603683,0.00042952053,0.0009158997,0.0001492713,0.00006581528,0.0000056075273,0.37521264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959018,0.0024434186,0.00084144395,0.000021088696,0.000048806072,3.988103e-9,6.5385996e-7,0.0000026625578,0.0007400901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952537,0.000006184961,0.000249708,0.0000785274,0.000022458056,0.00011775152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994486,0.000032953976,0.00034415117,0.00008009478,0.000029806015,0.00006439686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041551524,0.000051085357,0.00015623814,0.000017313308,0.00025472566,0.0000141341825,0.00015893826,0.0000520329,0.0006393586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009827179,0.000049316764,0.00004302609,0.000014192751,0.00011515295,0.00022218518,0.00004857257,0.000083128136,0.0000033127578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013705937,0.00003042766,0.015174596,0.000010166788,0.00016467231,0.0000051399907,0.0012742777,0.000016454067,0.0001223276,0.9679598,0.0024980311,0.012607023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019699899,0.00020907325,0.11493497,0.000037045138,0.000018635114,0.00002778559,0.0049134702,0.000026757112,0.0007235348,0.0122752,0.8646369,0.00022661165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054192934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010761421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018541097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001767043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81923866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240210251","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0302","title":"INTRODUCTION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Punitive damages; Supreme court; Criminology; Test (biology); Political science; Law; Sexual intercourse; Psychology; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.008082832676914065,"score_gpt":0.2253796253075708,"score_spread":0.21729679263065674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240210251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5551827,0.0004906471,0.004661084,0.0055514676,0.0010977822,0.000093504605,0.0000010706975,0.00003686889,0.43288487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945712,0.000593177,0.00073750434,0.00002142509,0.0006555,1.7560515e-8,3.575255e-7,0.0000013115107,0.003419522],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996272,0.000055881435,0.000047936875,0.000048238166,0.00013575931,0.00008502163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960005,0.00001290028,0.000061007224,0.00004944115,0.0002045649,0.000072026145],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013890631,0.000024767069,0.000056012235,0.000012996494,0.00082172616,0.000030536343,0.00011028324,0.000025923015,0.020170191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015245281,0.000027533075,0.00006821059,0.000031088315,0.00011988413,0.000623359,0.000011608996,0.000052040174,0.0000599593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006481144,0.00027629622,0.0010490086,0.000013611259,0.0002516599,0.00001852681,0.120605886,0.00016695708,0.0011311886,0.15541399,0.14249967,0.5785084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006740168,0.000023728879,0.00045613895,0.0000029722169,0.0000802472,0.0000044873236,0.5923848,0.00002534636,0.0000096839,0.00015154747,0.40675685,0.00003680117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7162486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69093394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5784716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018762416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030048988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240555861","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.163","title":"ENDING IMPUNITY: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE PROSECUTION OF HEADS OF STATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; State (computer science); Law; Mandate; Political science; Politics; Rule of law; Accountability; Premise; Economic Justice; Transitional justice; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08930135471851057,"score_gpt":0.31760099509362677,"score_spread":0.2282996403751162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240555861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122123055,0.00021868522,0.00076239894,0.00078844937,0.00023833779,0.00007287176,0.00001522767,0.0000075045987,0.8757735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.0002764842,0.00022045641,0.00001618876,0.00003529696,2.8015197e-8,1.0309051e-7,7.5857173e-7,0.00006450314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994704,0.00011434378,0.00008487029,0.000039036484,0.00020117938,0.00009012905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951756,0.00008810673,0.00009009344,0.00003611194,0.00022818468,0.000039933013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003533384,0.00003091827,0.00008427187,0.0000122311285,0.001104062,0.0000035331216,0.0001220488,0.00002318482,0.00043669826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080268896,0.000025623536,0.00006392345,0.000035796405,0.0010475396,0.00017341546,0.00002606528,0.000074491145,8.3185415e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060824503,0.0000703455,0.00046144312,0.0000021842293,0.0000314428,0.0000018813208,0.018652247,0.000001142689,0.0002761202,0.97989017,0.000100709665,0.00045149057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011216028,0.001771447,0.061391473,0.0005070046,0.00033326022,0.000021410106,0.48461837,0.000012015968,0.0055073486,0.3411137,0.10321051,0.00039187545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18707389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1746978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8772631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012621249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000894036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84916633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240900943","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.177","title":"PREFERENCE, PLURALISM, AND PROPORTIONALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Pluralism (philosophy); Proportionality (law); Social choice theory; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023434782033723903,"score_gpt":0.17786960044065103,"score_spread":0.15443481840692713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240900943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53895235,0.001468344,0.00030687198,0.00078823365,0.0003194382,0.000046508907,0.00006478236,0.00000871702,0.45804474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979928,0.00024678698,0.0008789309,0.000030031453,0.000050479415,2.9957775e-8,0.0000011000967,0.0000011047367,0.000798699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971014,0.0000035320545,0.00010931194,0.00008064861,0.000026909931,0.00006944795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970585,0.000007358034,0.00013474522,0.000048187692,0.00005053746,0.000053291027],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013323629,0.000040560924,0.000111159265,0.000009239434,0.00030028424,0.000015329664,0.00008721383,0.000032836382,0.0013952833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010743982,0.00004335813,0.000042010346,0.000009583876,0.00022644296,0.000338381,0.00004234863,0.00010216383,0.000012558345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011676963,0.000022943654,0.024861174,0.0000029870187,0.000029693218,0.0000029096334,0.00020311172,6.2065084e-7,0.000028339842,0.974164,0.00034211492,0.0003303927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005135834,0.000039357215,0.22650783,0.0000071052696,0.000008538743,0.000040746876,0.00029516546,0.000020509517,0.000016458267,0.04460342,0.7278277,0.00011956179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01842099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025390623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036173504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013853666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241341417","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.545","title":"MIND THE GAP: CANADA'S DIFFERENT CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS OF FAULT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Fault (geology); Criminal procedure; Section (typography); Ambivalence; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.037307828059278375,"score_gpt":0.25725847926338236,"score_spread":0.21995065120410398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241341417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7779123,0.0012682097,0.0022398015,0.0011867463,0.00045512608,0.00012461928,0.00015691484,0.0000043793348,0.21665187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990951,0.00029491424,0.00023579621,0.00001898872,0.000032920616,1.0048188e-8,2.8178832e-7,7.9974336e-7,0.00032118315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991951,0.00008551037,0.000086972344,0.000060049788,0.00045375017,0.000118638294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993953,0.000077407865,0.00011100621,0.00005334963,0.00025257867,0.00011037634],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002961855,0.000047791273,0.000101048565,0.000005703653,0.0007727653,0.000014770739,0.00018997141,0.000028662951,0.0014250849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045933582,0.000037814323,0.000041450807,0.000009991402,0.0024884683,0.00024122022,0.000036827936,0.00007313712,1.3001555e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002784503,0.0000569117,0.0062646186,0.000017177283,0.00006441894,0.000059530656,0.02923027,0.000003107085,0.00006388018,0.9545559,0.0041796193,0.005226064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064646685,0.00020147311,0.046875793,0.00015389259,0.00028306703,0.000072061746,0.1423832,0.0000123378095,0.00026275768,0.0009115107,0.8080001,0.00019737137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95249206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95364445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031802114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006445929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241675747","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.239","title":"REGIONAL COMPETITION LAW AGREEMENTS: AN IMPORTANT STEP FOR ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Externality; Competition law; Competition (biology); Business; Law and economics; Structuring; Law enforcement; Face (sociological concept); International trade; Economics; Member states; Pareto principle; Industrial organization; Public economics; Law; Political science; European union; Microeconomics; Operations management","score_opus":0.02003147405143842,"score_gpt":0.21157537182185143,"score_spread":0.191543897770413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241675747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12290525,0.00090592576,0.103650235,0.0011035113,0.0020978665,0.0004329605,0.00058911555,0.000050420334,0.7682647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99205357,0.00030407784,0.0063649644,0.0002322605,0.00014305503,1.9984246e-7,0.000062870706,0.0000067967144,0.0008322233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929655,0.000010848646,0.0003194916,0.00016012098,0.00006377355,0.00014923494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991611,0.000009477564,0.0004129825,0.00017398658,0.00010776377,0.00013466911],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035359894,0.000082755694,0.00022260012,0.00004042359,0.00041237968,0.00003789831,0.00023116497,0.00005545918,0.016448967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000380879,0.00010417431,0.00020043123,0.000023141058,0.00009076705,0.0005443913,0.000024917008,0.00010226573,0.000020019601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045556375,0.00011425197,0.0014275507,0.0000072476014,0.00009345781,0.0000038053058,0.0001714969,0.000008646676,0.00013491896,0.99721336,0.00062670046,0.00015298654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015259527,0.00022712091,0.0020963727,0.000013954006,0.00004447428,0.000020659105,0.0015048769,0.003009728,0.00005044256,0.015254652,0.9760326,0.00021916442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022159291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11334094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98195875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008208766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013995923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243079077","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.241","title":"THE IDEA OF CONSIDERATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Doctrine; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Epistemology; Control (management); Contrast (vision); Legal doctrine; Law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03285581476177582,"score_gpt":0.2494688006652572,"score_spread":0.21661298590348138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243079077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029914243,0.00022351519,0.00082304515,0.0007475578,0.00008023202,0.00005514142,0.0000029116748,0.000005598821,0.96814775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980178,0.00032020145,0.00087334047,0.000010983639,0.000029173676,1.15832615e-8,9.6275905e-8,7.4550655e-7,0.00074763654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997035,0.000048741604,0.00005915467,0.000026266885,0.00010398498,0.000058351223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964136,0.00003683888,0.00010707135,0.000052269395,0.00012312969,0.00003933846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026220953,0.00001732317,0.000038069058,0.000002493413,0.0010434105,0.000009900316,0.00015274793,0.00001957612,0.00059227785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014169277,0.000014648737,0.000038291724,0.00001036743,0.00028256542,0.00019855097,0.000017557746,0.00003586694,0.0000023028397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009541095,0.000014221257,0.00028277637,5.319577e-7,0.000009925134,6.65699e-7,0.011337775,7.969788e-7,0.00006898172,0.9862513,0.00061526493,0.0014082511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026815984,0.000046990735,0.009585188,0.000010563629,0.000029139766,0.0000028983015,0.05817419,0.000014719707,0.00033132758,0.015096626,0.9163818,0.000058394835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1684138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4350659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97115463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055387824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062594074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8371238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243377217","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.289","title":"BEYOND THE COUNTERTRADE TABOO: WHY THE WTO SHOULD TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT BARTER AND COUNTERTRADE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Barter; Cronyism; Currency; Economics; International economics; Order (exchange); International trade; Transaction cost; Business; Monetary economics; Law; Market economy; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.014392428692588275,"score_gpt":0.1897680677407137,"score_spread":0.17537563904812542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243377217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7141684,0.006243909,0.00024566034,0.014202028,0.0012807713,0.00019552746,0.00035447342,0.000014699571,0.26329452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941036,0.00082045305,0.00006034552,0.0030288447,0.00020783584,1.1646046e-7,0.000001371585,0.00000975871,0.0017676817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993395,0.000018986551,0.00020628628,0.0001442023,0.00006927174,0.00022172698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993786,0.000042870895,0.00023875029,0.00023292779,0.00003760924,0.00006921284],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033110104,0.00012394243,0.0002252,0.00001597951,0.0007234459,0.00009057868,0.00040765063,0.00009759781,0.002220685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008887146,0.00009040145,0.00013140182,0.000021783251,0.00038023898,0.000335772,0.0000848039,0.00025693368,0.000026907985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118942946,0.00008196031,0.022313027,0.000013535946,0.00015449697,0.000015623638,0.009307804,0.000008587872,0.0005979236,0.780718,0.18612005,0.0005500143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003966303,0.00005594717,0.028949201,0.000006453581,0.000019675526,0.00006756816,0.00097155233,0.00005940373,0.000039576993,0.0029941532,0.9663189,0.00012094548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01847579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11825078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7801989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010030094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010346165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243583015","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.251","title":"IN SEARCH OF ‘BORA'S HEAD’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Head (geology); Geology; Political science; Paleontology","score_opus":0.024312292420346333,"score_gpt":0.21923113901315497,"score_spread":0.19491884659280864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243583015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33785632,0.00149967,0.00007500903,0.00084721635,0.0004726511,0.00005208272,0.0000094295065,0.000007548227,0.65918005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955305,0.00010366034,0.00015114086,0.00010313189,0.000115224924,3.1676806e-9,7.5536855e-7,0.0000014062998,0.0039941776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958754,0.00004331208,0.00009310812,0.00005206578,0.00011549553,0.00010850211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997397,0.000014553166,0.00006326614,0.000059418642,0.000075737094,0.000047310656],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016945819,0.000040670264,0.00012280031,0.00003652457,0.00020739407,0.0000026453679,0.00015246494,0.000026026031,0.007246065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002346064,0.000043079624,0.00005710936,0.0000055998853,0.00055888295,0.00032415177,0.000016017828,0.00012043861,0.000006883693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028678976,0.00019640035,0.00031591675,0.000015639029,0.000021385076,0.0001263178,0.3000067,0.000014637626,0.00017588408,0.6881994,0.007564411,0.0030765433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013633777,0.0006268799,0.0077065052,0.000083960724,0.000020203981,0.00002606574,0.030083312,0.000038335613,0.00005733793,0.0021482774,0.95772433,0.000121409175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012057799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16567335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9501599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032969754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243814312","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.263","title":"BILATERALISM VERSUS MULTILATERALISM IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW: APPLYING THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bilateralism; Subsidiarity; Multilateralism; Political science; Law and economics; Federalist; Government (linguistics); International law; Economics; Politics; Public administration; Law; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.014386067779344968,"score_gpt":0.23321075993873608,"score_spread":0.2188246921593911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243814312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9170623,0.000022788674,0.000018446404,0.00038673915,0.0013715253,0.00010361325,0.00000401158,0.000011277094,0.08101934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913627,0.0000132764535,0.00030174575,0.00008686926,0.00031733073,1.5782682e-7,0.0000043173413,0.000004209087,0.00013581055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953645,0.000010242837,0.00015444806,0.000082799816,0.00011754183,0.00009849707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994783,0.00002410928,0.00029841508,0.0001038304,0.000083731036,0.000011623933],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002494559,0.000066864726,0.0001121484,0.0000368831,0.00016949812,0.000075688666,0.00036149035,0.00004872897,0.0017722043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011322994,0.000059310434,0.00007238056,0.00001655492,0.000115458286,0.0013740255,0.00010888055,0.00017579763,0.000014975833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035092104,0.00007779316,0.013977882,0.000018340997,0.00006121518,0.000015722222,0.0011131036,0.0002305034,0.0025495158,0.98026216,0.00016764778,0.0011752221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018204032,0.0000073527835,0.023916978,0.000020121162,0.000022286935,0.000003415823,0.00080497947,0.0015910785,0.00024018383,0.00052121334,0.9709453,0.00010666205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23121199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39835846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070100185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011322378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243929112","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.dagan","title":"INSIDE PROPERTY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Autonomy; Property rights; Property law; Tangible property; Corporate governance; Business; Public property; Interpersonal communication; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025693669923225436,"score_gpt":0.2590236299858315,"score_spread":0.23332996006260606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243929112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020629466,0.0002957626,0.00032365744,0.0011500198,0.00011286059,0.000050327744,0.0000022800182,0.00001294577,0.97742265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364287,0.0002052842,0.0012585332,0.0000447166,0.00020610027,1.6036555e-8,2.2682921e-7,0.0000015400738,0.0046407226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995988,0.000048406197,0.000044880948,0.00003215676,0.00013673237,0.00013903326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999658,0.000012467785,0.000057991612,0.00005364396,0.000066882094,0.00015099664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026060452,0.000025983829,0.000049827584,0.0000039427714,0.0008607793,0.000013866966,0.00016714822,0.000029395214,0.0015293383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009140933,0.000021346797,0.00004478316,0.000014838088,0.0001430516,0.00066111836,0.000031581312,0.000059409776,0.000021530872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014469291,0.00012253314,0.0042030993,0.000002753312,0.000024338173,0.0000023553346,0.029202648,0.0000031252234,0.00021705545,0.94969875,0.0066254684,0.009883412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000979528,0.00000803814,0.0031926273,0.0000041976764,0.000009387341,0.0000023918199,0.010467892,0.0000020122943,0.000017775827,0.00017322558,0.98598826,0.00003623289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1863979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1845904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018237236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005270743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244513941","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0088","title":"The law of strangers: The form and substance of other-regarding international adjudication","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Accountability; Political science; Sovereignty; Globalization; Law; Jurisprudence; Settlement (finance); International law; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.010891590445995207,"score_gpt":0.23700090764014323,"score_spread":0.226109317194148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244513941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22872114,0.0013590152,0.0021993795,0.02811203,0.00085228914,0.000278364,0.000031462885,0.000022212203,0.7384241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989559,0.00026538406,0.0003802292,0.000025925634,0.00009680826,1.2090123e-8,2.3271953e-7,0.0000022019349,0.00027332635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947536,0.00006483581,0.000096584256,0.000044364646,0.00024926502,0.0000695689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999284,0.000082654675,0.00023774765,0.00006915702,0.000296023,0.00003040623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004374338,0.000030119998,0.00005905745,0.0000066245457,0.00078848394,0.000019530838,0.00032741137,0.000023710294,0.0003803818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002028513,0.000022919596,0.00003170816,0.00003677603,0.0012504414,0.00039310902,0.000018145589,0.0000426125,5.153966e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030012685,0.000012114318,0.0011266524,0.0000017495479,0.00004256734,1.9915596e-7,0.016843589,0.0000011902303,0.0003440498,0.98033106,0.00025928396,0.0010075069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010284979,0.00010183669,0.016950399,0.000103774495,0.000075944474,0.000005877706,0.06415628,0.00005430173,0.0030310708,0.004942049,0.9094326,0.00011739979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024493543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39214376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97538906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009080416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003313479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98200244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245190038","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.867","title":"CONSTITUTIONALIZING SELF-DEFENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Self defense; Law; Criminal code; Supreme court; Political science; Criminal law; Dignity; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03859207213984661,"score_gpt":0.19711780775754367,"score_spread":0.15852573561769706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245190038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06604465,0.0002324648,0.0013564285,0.00004873815,0.00037022194,0.00004429249,0.000007817079,0.000047637972,0.93184775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956368,0.00022402377,0.0036534064,0.00007551232,0.000033083856,8.530077e-9,9.23537e-8,0.000002042568,0.00037498327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949324,0.000046026125,0.0000751116,0.00010197831,0.00015796683,0.00012565561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966305,0.000022238963,0.000094287076,0.000081821374,0.000045627414,0.00009297861],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007961979,0.00005353126,0.000075702446,0.0000104236715,0.0004434818,0.000008008255,0.00028924263,0.00002778618,0.0029602668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001992838,0.000054475706,0.000066581386,0.00002023458,0.0002399335,0.00057494256,0.00005181895,0.00008138678,0.000031451647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063968255,0.00020657,0.0012215807,0.000011298839,0.000017778648,0.00042398192,0.004321363,0.000006349898,0.02945221,0.9618867,0.0012717049,0.0011164618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004562717,0.0008712934,0.019808598,0.0003342929,0.00022963157,0.0034950885,0.008332741,0.0004403925,0.13024157,0.020757947,0.8096778,0.001247967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006253223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030866533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9411288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008541316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004462273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245544978","doi":"10.3138/utlj.57.4.781","title":"THE ROLE OF EMOTIONS IN THE RULE OF LAW","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.008709613143756954,"score_gpt":0.238056225269696,"score_spread":0.22934661212593904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245544978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08498383,0.0011131337,0.00003363017,0.0014258117,0.00009456504,0.000059825983,0.00000515376,0.0000030363897,0.912281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985595,0.0005985486,0.00020831628,0.000036703565,0.000053722135,7.160222e-9,2.0619267e-7,9.096531e-7,0.0005421307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993998,0.00011046504,0.00008480007,0.000032673775,0.00025843395,0.0001138339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995455,0.000106094354,0.00013114729,0.00007061705,0.000115068884,0.000031540552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011230678,0.000028407385,0.000068042806,0.0000013976812,0.0010063428,0.000009632323,0.00040010855,0.000055883113,0.00018107712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012729886,0.000019124991,0.000103050916,0.000036472436,0.00070357264,0.0001929716,0.000021060929,0.00010642172,5.714631e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001606679,0.000049803813,0.00038010423,0.0000015199047,0.000017157436,0.0000015880923,0.11093012,0.00000500758,0.00016891822,0.8869914,0.0004371481,0.0010011613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016964917,0.00002307971,0.003855221,0.000014634292,0.000014927494,0.0000017599291,0.36840487,0.0000012281047,0.0000901983,0.0070381593,0.6203597,0.000026582007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07886742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5153422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9135756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008662576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036594112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9272665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245566518","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.469","title":"CANADA'S THIRD NATIONAL POLICY: THE EPIPHENOMENAL OR THE REAL CONSTITUTION?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Political science; National Policy; Public administration; State (computer science); Law; Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.012829605554604516,"score_gpt":0.24844310949393947,"score_spread":0.23561350393933495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245566518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013596169,0.00011638259,0.00002782322,0.15918157,0.00013305403,0.00007188712,0.00012750382,0.000005071249,0.8389771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98143077,0.00046897528,0.000046638597,0.0053557977,0.0006692345,2.2863198e-8,5.226506e-7,9.904152e-7,0.012027026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907887,0.00011161217,0.00007858469,0.00005732541,0.0004804517,0.00019317355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941224,0.00010454761,0.00013130544,0.000069215064,0.00015080356,0.00013188036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000405324,0.000048119033,0.000069937334,0.000007696571,0.0024577589,0.000037882837,0.00044438193,0.00003114686,0.0005164066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009119957,0.000029128661,0.000050035927,0.00005478777,0.00058005936,0.00023591243,0.000014951781,0.000119535565,0.0000015678917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030406054,0.0000070534084,0.000030346435,3.1083928e-7,0.000014446694,0.000012055967,0.0030537476,0.000030539235,0.0000016793081,0.8506925,0.14518265,0.00094426225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018404008,0.00002041586,0.00999437,0.0000069502316,0.000008812514,0.000015532465,0.0036060296,0.0000060158527,9.617813e-7,0.0034197115,0.9826898,0.000047377045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99921995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99990064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018271941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007210858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245605678","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.255","title":"The Logic of Planning and the Aim of the Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Equivocation; Legal positivism; Order (exchange); Positivism; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Legal profession; Economics","score_opus":0.01463502003074349,"score_gpt":0.24117583763820172,"score_spread":0.22654081760745823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245605678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07987161,0.016567405,0.00005313418,0.0062975334,0.0005639028,0.00016209803,0.000007322318,0.0000066626267,0.8964703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800426,0.0008170536,0.00007453338,0.00008960631,0.00009195212,1.3596594e-8,4.9376915e-8,9.910814e-7,0.00092151976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933434,0.00022763135,0.00006981434,0.000028182843,0.00022316047,0.00011688023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994715,0.0001451528,0.0001883062,0.00007472604,0.0000804642,0.000039871444],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009076968,0.000033679928,0.00008437102,4.6859722e-7,0.0019704406,0.000012846682,0.00035907538,0.000051330015,0.00011284824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022422488,0.000016043414,0.000108818436,0.000019745718,0.0020818736,0.00023508487,0.00006760551,0.00011090114,2.1605203e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033620057,0.0000127248995,0.0012692749,0.0000027486471,0.00003773892,1.86997e-7,0.09801253,0.000005855819,0.0000233381,0.899169,0.0012883627,0.00014460867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077243143,0.000026139021,0.0053372644,0.000049283117,0.00009354028,0.0000065267527,0.40301183,0.00000525555,0.00007787196,0.008666934,0.58189374,0.00005921171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02214235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034968045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91813266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004606955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023910097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246449393","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.783","title":"CITIZENSHIP REVOCATION AS PUNISHMENT: ON THE MODERN DUTIES OF CITIZENS AND THEIR CRIMINAL BREACH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Citizenship; Law; Duty; Political science; Punishment (psychology); State (computer science); Polity; Punitive damages; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04046815951217862,"score_gpt":0.2348403605115367,"score_spread":0.1943722009993581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246449393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34357858,0.00030739186,0.00011388084,0.0006792734,0.00007008378,0.00006392507,0.000012713985,0.000005506767,0.65516865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979636,0.00026420955,0.00006281923,0.000067299865,0.000057717232,3.898175e-8,1.7907816e-7,0.0000021291096,0.0015819886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993234,0.00016390345,0.00009442767,0.00006845358,0.00020504394,0.00014474697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999453,0.00009572622,0.00016080425,0.00008450169,0.00011111706,0.00009485639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044947397,0.00005439078,0.0001125458,0.000006859632,0.0005319703,0.00001415633,0.00020898202,0.000047475736,0.00050164445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047662234,0.00004088037,0.0000580726,0.000013384221,0.00048562232,0.00014507746,0.000028904286,0.000081091195,0.0000016731632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048796755,0.00002251248,0.00026624536,0.000007768958,0.000025138212,0.00000267083,0.049288567,1.9113226e-7,0.000055016026,0.9486009,0.00055535673,0.0011268643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015153423,0.00088780635,0.07676162,0.00066583074,0.00018744504,0.00007452433,0.25660554,0.00008351443,0.0017293263,0.60279083,0.058223333,0.00047491258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22487095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039109617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65438503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012975303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050958064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97842413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246612561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.405","title":"JUDICIAL POLITICS IN AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Dialectic; Rule of law; Law; Constraint (computer-aided design); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Law and economics; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Adjudication; Independence (probability theory); Sociology; Democracy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015423808318879165,"score_gpt":0.2529957120198597,"score_spread":0.23757190370098055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246612561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017396549,0.0008628038,0.00010561623,0.0053358767,0.00023752962,0.00004014921,0.000003132884,0.000011419922,0.9760069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982995,0.00047966416,0.00036459506,0.00007834989,0.0003112379,5.1563696e-9,2.6788032e-7,7.293459e-7,0.0004656751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993931,0.00006804999,0.00008222884,0.000059906382,0.00021800054,0.00017873183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997006,0.000022775754,0.000060655522,0.00003244982,0.00009412192,0.00008938228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023731792,0.000042174324,0.000111153204,0.000016263462,0.0012765314,0.0000134482925,0.0001684476,0.0000500326,0.00029508796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003280435,0.000048415797,0.000058974278,0.000035129717,0.00038874298,0.00029611477,0.000016718515,0.00008889184,0.0000038620506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665835,0.000038296435,0.00063496537,2.9363466e-7,0.000009040927,0.000034218378,0.004984043,0.0000028423294,0.00000580498,0.991471,0.0008597514,0.0019430935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075496803,0.00015575296,0.05442399,0.000069201385,0.000037638387,0.000008927375,0.06334688,0.0000040564414,0.000007214745,0.2866033,0.59440535,0.00018274602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42274737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5234226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003632119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017186672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246713511","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.519","title":"REGULATION AND PUBLIC LAW IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Democracy; Legitimacy; Legislature; Political science; Statute; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.026559781979468653,"score_gpt":0.2704350863892322,"score_spread":0.24387530440976354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246713511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20278083,0.00031727672,0.000036415036,0.0018454554,0.000121031364,0.000042757125,0.000002065114,0.0000053297845,0.79484886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946475,0.000110343346,0.00024214888,0.00002121175,0.00007718226,1.7063174e-8,1.8458071e-7,5.008542e-7,0.00008367535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962,0.000054716715,0.00004581372,0.000056669785,0.00013448825,0.000088273126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996389,0.00003208212,0.000052986517,0.000021406358,0.00019416388,0.0000604324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018203433,0.000030880285,0.000080877646,0.0000106222815,0.0009868224,0.000020860864,0.00007507861,0.00003431301,0.0003646538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016780863,0.00003315245,0.000023380908,0.000024498788,0.0010422278,0.000520125,0.000024653535,0.00010032904,0.0000014997668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014722217,0.000022571048,0.0023190046,2.4474207e-7,0.000011954405,0.000002489201,0.018196952,7.450109e-7,0.000080385995,0.97910017,0.00007141905,0.00017934035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008841473,0.00006769354,0.13725875,0.00002306246,0.000023366878,0.0000097064985,0.45902976,0.000018528654,0.000017619048,0.162344,0.24016158,0.00016178934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54679865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8167562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018278898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066818124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.758994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246890151","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.317","title":"THE VERTICAL RESTRAINTS PARADOX: JUSTIFYING THE DIFFERENT LEGAL TREATMENT OF PRICE AND NON-PRICE VERTICAL RESTRAINTS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertical restraints; Rule of reason; Resale price maintenance; Supreme court; Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031081620689989327,"score_gpt":0.20533742162380983,"score_spread":0.1742558009338205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246890151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94513947,0.003994189,0.0006191435,0.0017812864,0.00020701921,0.00010245022,0.000022537766,0.0000047263993,0.048129197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951524,0.004421279,0.0000887999,0.000022656228,0.000060625,1.9329376e-7,4.7562702e-7,0.0000027853816,0.0002507517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993417,0.00002293456,0.00023514156,0.00013083052,0.000079142585,0.00019019487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995162,0.00013446719,0.000090389265,0.00012157361,0.000046529596,0.0000908549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013028023,0.000096885255,0.00023135472,0.000011702263,0.0011204645,0.000022878114,0.00019198161,0.0000423299,0.00009050039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003431612,0.00006519156,0.00011561211,0.000022924882,0.0008112448,0.00018646638,0.0000649777,0.00010081234,0.0000063473703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004549651,0.00039632764,0.023949893,0.000015795642,0.0004957204,0.0001270537,0.0038801667,0.00003377433,0.00007470299,0.96847755,0.00050306314,0.0015909867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023596047,0.0005802511,0.87130123,0.00004173366,0.000081481274,0.0002540727,0.002577555,0.00049152056,0.00011136212,0.0032795225,0.118687175,0.00023451664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072784787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030417237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96519804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026112105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034701225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246970930","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.277","title":"Why Compare? Comments on Kevin Jon Heller and Markus D Dubber’s <i>The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Comparative law; Political science","score_opus":0.05438337534974762,"score_gpt":0.3075949605492642,"score_spread":0.2532115851995166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246970930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23187456,0.0061120642,0.00024427092,0.0017389213,0.00045693098,0.00020473618,0.000029463105,0.000008886623,0.75933015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978634,0.0006898733,0.00018766138,0.00048147637,0.000121257806,9.828735e-8,0.0000011481385,0.0000021188596,0.00065292977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899423,0.00026598512,0.00013535924,0.00007413804,0.00035297443,0.00017728677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919695,0.000209851,0.00020191012,0.000067076406,0.0002166644,0.00010754974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034965837,0.00008805242,0.00022321782,0.000012484711,0.001223014,0.000022457825,0.0002386285,0.000024630503,0.00077113503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000658517,0.00007333666,0.00008083931,0.000018488528,0.0008617968,0.00044356988,0.00008339248,0.00011372574,0.0000054976863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005038193,0.00039366525,0.0084394775,0.000012852417,0.00032280217,0.000003467999,0.0897968,0.000011184865,0.00012507643,0.76495594,0.13508324,0.00035167692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006119779,0.00015009983,0.009222582,0.00011081127,0.0000716968,0.000004300461,0.038275514,0.000009948513,0.00029026225,0.00030654945,0.95084745,0.00009879896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0725908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22813594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8157642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001781631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020580508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9406558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246999568","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.731","title":"MISFEASANCE AS AN ORGANIZING NORMATIVE IDEA IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Tort; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Meaning (existential); Private law; Relation (database); Liability; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.011420385509152866,"score_gpt":0.2647944649778695,"score_spread":0.25337407946871665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246999568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58446556,0.000026204274,0.00012067452,0.00082176883,0.000088407694,0.00006659563,0.0000041734756,0.000013844942,0.4143928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971211,0.00006263053,0.0023161497,0.00008931543,0.000094171366,3.2404202e-8,7.010832e-7,0.0000029480254,0.00031294394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943644,0.00006690347,0.00008866281,0.000080956015,0.0001750181,0.00015200219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995133,0.0000255609,0.00011091357,0.00009800296,0.00010666895,0.00014554519],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034157035,0.000046816873,0.00008548674,0.00000917581,0.0009282188,0.000044463202,0.00037416036,0.000058056088,0.0011424817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018711875,0.000052891548,0.000034810364,0.000042068023,0.00027913516,0.0011019895,0.000046857127,0.00021901997,0.000017151388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010532667,0.000045998528,0.0008472116,0.0000014105731,0.000005443965,0.0000074807967,0.018340703,0.0000043625164,0.0017300897,0.9784048,0.000053995445,0.00054796715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006726562,0.000056951416,0.011828018,0.000027201862,0.00001553175,0.000011417926,0.03609273,0.00004020955,0.0005650192,0.013864226,0.9366379,0.00018818695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32118005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8537992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9645406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016512487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008204211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247183412","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.201","title":"Recent Developments in WTO Jurisprudence: Has the Appellate Body Resolved the Issue of an Appropriate Standard of Review in SPS Cases?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of review; Deference; Context (archaeology); Flexibility (engineering); Jurisprudence; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Balance (ability); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Judicial review; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.02427028833850085,"score_gpt":0.28137912274520366,"score_spread":0.2571088344067028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247183412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58080906,0.09951162,0.00028146725,0.11062071,0.0020072137,0.003792557,0.00008793861,0.00005542792,0.202834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756945,0.023259947,0.00068784726,0.00011629051,0.000045629262,7.105181e-8,0.000001189597,0.000005246746,0.00018927797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828583,0.00060880685,0.00029763958,0.00008368079,0.00050834846,0.00021569498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907637,0.00007551813,0.00038327198,0.00015888772,0.00021270315,0.00009327203],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023388648,0.00007403511,0.00023552653,0.000024092094,0.0003889262,0.000015672025,0.00054714485,0.000050344788,0.0013902945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010890746,0.00005573135,0.000042742548,0.00021058795,0.0004442912,0.0006844518,0.00007139706,0.00015660899,0.0000025702532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001781635,0.0019195367,0.10137028,0.0008207682,0.00044542382,0.00018370073,0.42696124,0.0001899505,0.0010906267,0.35835245,0.015746871,0.09113751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005859164,0.000059522445,0.024860376,0.00050389045,0.000042967516,0.0000073896003,0.015988188,0.000002262551,0.00031365696,0.000084262916,0.95744884,0.00010270859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030096276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20275314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035857354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002639937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247679508","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.02","title":"The Society of Property","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Normative; Scope (computer science); Object (grammar); Business; Transaction cost; Freedom of contract; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021958059277297663,"score_gpt":0.25504533425970555,"score_spread":0.2330872749824079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247679508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019464178,0.0015280432,0.0007210771,0.0058226073,0.0001832707,0.00011919182,0.0000062234158,0.000011400912,0.972144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927026,0.00096675236,0.0010463208,0.000021287451,0.00012440064,1.8146473e-8,1.09546136e-7,0.0000011425609,0.0051373835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962705,0.00004282242,0.000050671384,0.000023028682,0.00014370323,0.00011269775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966174,0.000030660816,0.000088922025,0.00005767021,0.00008886671,0.00007214933],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044094934,0.000020755922,0.000042640335,0.0000010320622,0.0013160853,0.000010168354,0.00021685207,0.00002410001,0.00028249348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000059869694,0.000012994541,0.00010655499,0.000013917697,0.00031233465,0.00030964962,0.000033927285,0.0000518834,0.0000025805148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016025391,0.00009675723,0.0025017068,0.0000046552395,0.000066738496,1.5354765e-7,0.042905763,0.0000029590383,0.0003081535,0.92117023,0.02229987,0.010626969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007398901,0.000007388315,0.0015835915,0.0000035892683,0.000010993723,5.9689023e-7,0.025133826,0.0000055183486,0.000027311566,0.00015165358,0.9729807,0.000020853597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0887993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06692435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010709221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005302282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248148381","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.313","title":"LEGAL POSITIVISM AS AN IDEA ABOUT MORALITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Utilitarianism; Legal realism; Law; Directive; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Legal profession","score_opus":0.04242048475938505,"score_gpt":0.3216567940517019,"score_spread":0.27923630929231685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248148381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08509101,0.00004452743,0.00018674915,0.0032634605,0.00035764783,0.00004349215,0.000003806722,0.000019406396,0.9109899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356407,0.00006879045,0.0022114122,0.0002832081,0.00013758475,2.1544539e-8,0.000001557116,0.0000026027137,0.003730732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992205,0.00023954791,0.000097990946,0.00007841959,0.00022696967,0.00013655992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991819,0.000029436122,0.00017417416,0.00009754696,0.00034210808,0.00017483096],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006175792,0.000046529596,0.00007653811,0.000016979655,0.0011937234,0.00007654275,0.0002669622,0.00005713189,0.010204166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058260426,0.000054090004,0.000052343727,0.000047665544,0.00025407097,0.0036143006,0.000018847772,0.00021058852,0.00002871196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041328687,0.0001368901,0.0006166743,0.0000010085456,0.00002025283,0.000014196016,0.04475762,2.5957442e-7,0.000031007112,0.9512867,0.0014280799,0.00166601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026087253,0.00009427836,0.024992527,0.00000993638,0.00003471941,0.000020142825,0.069471434,0.000002711817,0.0000479433,0.0041525243,0.90080595,0.00010695051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8115668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45587763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94713414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022628321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049066846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99070066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248566953","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.511","title":"TREBILCOCK'S HERESY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heresy; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.009960277216154228,"score_gpt":0.25230285097464383,"score_spread":0.2423425737584896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248566953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104846165,0.000056470875,0.00021319524,0.0017705702,0.00020231584,0.000043844357,0.000004732854,0.000016810023,0.89284587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393004,0.000100010075,0.0017845372,0.000029661493,0.00019758138,1.3593504e-8,3.08476e-7,0.0000018580866,0.003955975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958956,0.000030147645,0.000050788494,0.000053199987,0.00016616871,0.00011012387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995961,0.000020954256,0.00006876338,0.00008139325,0.00010148394,0.00013126503],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022701589,0.000030013076,0.000056399444,0.0000050580597,0.0010199662,0.000026725249,0.0002806589,0.0000552956,0.0045814654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011976582,0.000032318192,0.000063646556,0.00001687541,0.00022942324,0.00032285566,0.000028714623,0.00015463869,0.00001786349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084361345,0.000045329827,0.00055789115,9.609049e-7,0.000011589014,0.000004866139,0.005477766,0.0000017214963,0.00089246867,0.98468584,0.0026008282,0.0057123066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015679629,0.000011296973,0.0018041217,0.0000024881565,0.000008902971,0.0000030806127,0.0071267756,0.0000052383025,0.000028420463,0.0011878026,0.98962295,0.00004214948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20898737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7553338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071959985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008101902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248687743","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.1","title":"THE PUZZLE OF MARTIAL LAW","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Martial law; Proclamation; Political science; Comparative law; Politics","score_opus":0.008655443699399041,"score_gpt":0.2413368030932218,"score_spread":0.23268135939382276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248687743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043261643,0.000322453,0.00019089627,0.0019539015,0.00014473402,0.000026689038,0.0000066953608,0.0000050269414,0.99302346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713224,0.00022318681,0.00034356533,0.00010731722,0.00013303713,2.8126197e-9,2.329781e-7,6.814767e-7,0.002059759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946016,0.00008397655,0.000074750955,0.00003511327,0.00021477403,0.00013122008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955094,0.00006823319,0.00010836459,0.00005646884,0.00012862451,0.00008738325],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024371535,0.000030866784,0.000072743234,0.0000031733998,0.0015626387,0.000013812499,0.00023475013,0.000028251608,0.00043482252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015146852,0.000027037559,0.00007427341,0.000014438598,0.0012920646,0.00021047247,0.000013183929,0.000058052225,0.0000020664318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024238805,0.000017644203,0.000047716723,3.8684885e-7,0.000010464595,0.0000040526897,0.0008106317,0.000004572016,0.000027478114,0.9969821,0.0010268205,0.0010438807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001317083,0.000052895106,0.00040740534,0.0000066789817,0.000014907486,0.0000038089577,0.005371452,0.0000012367153,0.000028692259,0.00257183,0.99137497,0.00003440896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13153844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25073817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012142555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022932145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248798288","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.185","title":"TOWARD A STUDY OF THE ECOLOGY OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Political science; Environmentalism; Sociology; Law; Biology; Politics","score_opus":0.017134776734915192,"score_gpt":0.25195240689489146,"score_spread":0.23481763015997625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248798288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86087495,0.00010049027,0.000008548007,0.001061486,0.00022035128,0.000113429574,0.000002781254,0.000004512949,0.13761346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925166,0.00013683975,0.0000807974,0.000042929612,0.00007782179,8.23872e-9,5.725252e-8,9.263971e-7,0.00040896435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926525,0.00019940796,0.000095283875,0.000054656164,0.0002802305,0.00010514136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994611,0.000026995274,0.00024028574,0.00007290601,0.00015479072,0.00004388348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002824771,0.000040214534,0.00014908679,0.0000019344789,0.0005791395,0.0000045906286,0.00039943578,0.00007810214,0.00046843375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001891465,0.000032374584,0.00013240331,0.00003991583,0.0003393734,0.00019940344,0.000034881235,0.00011368452,2.992427e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024904663,0.0017998216,0.00844069,0.00000896372,0.0002637948,0.000015339338,0.837478,0.000052610732,0.00092767255,0.14014225,0.0063680992,0.0042537544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019556135,0.0011110505,0.12825467,0.000036769517,0.00019518459,0.000005710199,0.8103121,0.000002679877,0.0002194053,0.004455717,0.053325884,0.00012521309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034302488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20235804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16805555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013856572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000961392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97212815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249523082","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.893","title":"INVESTMENT RULES AND THE DENIAL OF CHANGE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Law; Liberalism; Rule of law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.017559733650854063,"score_gpt":0.1950726318927486,"score_spread":0.17751289824189453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249523082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37942094,0.00013490346,0.0000420028,0.0021330442,0.00042944483,0.00011638889,0.000002808693,0.000008025661,0.61771244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570304,0.000042127,0.00047372264,0.0031808624,0.00043527188,7.7783135e-8,0.0000021171768,0.0000024617893,0.00016031358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967754,0.000007132476,0.00008067532,0.000043233475,0.00013814043,0.00005329043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996329,0.000013417214,0.00017376353,0.00004887119,0.00012170281,0.0000093346325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017519016,0.000042885473,0.00007672552,0.00001648881,0.0001937277,0.000034728004,0.00014167995,0.00002180175,0.0009251562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009910931,0.00003214999,0.000048482438,0.000010197626,0.00026357255,0.00086608407,0.000059394697,0.00007090675,0.0000062425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007631836,0.00002291825,0.00034535013,0.000007477978,0.000022441302,0.000001804476,0.00023128663,2.420941e-7,0.00035698587,0.99812776,0.0005794565,0.00022796186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045381845,0.00003328656,0.019427521,0.00004495423,0.00012833826,0.000024933499,0.0015324928,0.001651319,0.00022549657,0.035806924,0.93642783,0.0001587152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023155931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032816187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012899467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063863104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249874612","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.439","title":"Future(s) of American Legal History","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Critical legal studies; Scholarship; Narrative; Legal history; Legal culture; Elite; Rhetorical question; Legal realism; Political science; Legal profession; History; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011899754422835447,"score_gpt":0.23535662559417084,"score_spread":0.2234568711713354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249874612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01913443,0.00227524,0.00029714705,0.0003670558,0.0007032661,0.000023648348,0.000008799346,0.00000765661,0.97718275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99464417,0.0003639923,0.0015451116,0.00008300945,0.0006235719,6.2152536e-9,4.825222e-7,0.0000017336788,0.0027379214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993694,0.0001042625,0.000076618904,0.00003643463,0.00023114096,0.00018214736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993948,0.000035396974,0.00019765984,0.00005513981,0.00012046011,0.00019659],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002291177,0.000040861316,0.00012207003,0.000010824446,0.00031505604,0.0000026856796,0.00018001796,0.000026032498,0.002045554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009989026,0.00004613213,0.00008916566,0.000016845215,0.0018255046,0.0004871352,0.000019453535,0.00007167031,0.0000034440773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017122442,0.000040212813,0.0015376757,0.0000016785776,0.00002123954,0.0000026595674,0.0037849667,8.989694e-7,0.000020743848,0.987907,0.005034252,0.0016315359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009112225,0.00003295541,0.0016243451,0.0000045433785,0.000022830152,0.0000063866855,0.022204842,2.42249e-7,0.0000048152638,0.000026018515,0.97593224,0.00004967349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33879188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07896929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074624043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005800265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249882619","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.i","title":"<scp>editors' note</scp>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.017834647115386404,"score_gpt":0.23352937344884037,"score_spread":0.21569472633345396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249882619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009632736,0.00033691208,0.00035852345,0.00024990528,0.0015209225,0.00004407421,0.00000509426,0.000018418305,0.98783344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985469,0.00047201602,0.0026433654,0.000034812645,0.001999443,1.8583894e-8,5.013801e-7,0.0000042216084,0.009376614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993992,0.00006721654,0.00006920638,0.00006533086,0.00022995805,0.00016909778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994786,0.00004666314,0.0000989773,0.00006345347,0.00017358165,0.0001387747],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022423785,0.000047023852,0.00009196276,0.000010326919,0.0016699118,0.000014212478,0.00019861493,0.00006271942,0.0010646867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035575667,0.000046870642,0.00010330701,0.000026976464,0.00038536865,0.0004632923,0.000046258676,0.000085100604,0.000012670946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023533421,0.00019816663,0.0025628544,0.000008430515,0.00016266349,0.00013307964,0.32080296,0.0000067183423,0.000053811622,0.44720274,0.2255895,0.003255535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019808512,0.000044663244,0.0049145804,0.000008590124,0.000030320884,0.000003994392,0.04887422,0.000002730755,0.000013160177,0.0005813279,0.9453026,0.000025745765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.191352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30498704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019440729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075072014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249935794","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.381","title":"FREEDOM, LAW, AND NAKED VIOLENCE: A REPLY TO KRAMER","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Clearance; Law; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Position (finance); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.007710817025249586,"score_gpt":0.2358381702143783,"score_spread":0.22812735318912872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249935794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06677052,0.0016286628,0.00016185347,0.010361194,0.0003179477,0.00016833811,0.000010061562,0.000048387512,0.92053306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98682255,0.0019900952,0.004297296,0.003933403,0.00029657918,2.4166374e-8,5.629951e-7,0.0000029113864,0.0026565543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927056,0.000080993945,0.0000771228,0.000112266134,0.00027186392,0.00018721745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994437,0.000019922067,0.00007711426,0.00008350737,0.00013985291,0.00023589385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032255577,0.00006227947,0.0001221852,0.0000022441702,0.0013506016,0.000049234837,0.00025389544,0.00008511463,0.00071702077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001801586,0.000062558145,0.000087261644,0.00003407728,0.00037720453,0.00045891732,0.000029059407,0.0001248303,0.0000054358543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009005385,0.000084214764,0.00018927155,0.0000038019543,0.00004571011,0.000034891,0.09085299,0.000011953664,0.00030035866,0.8731332,0.028434103,0.0068194414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040216168,0.00014153447,0.0010954887,0.00007072725,0.000029408846,0.000009727808,0.05148156,0.0000026150262,0.000017059616,0.005230098,0.9414016,0.000118037395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07837147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10343086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92005205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017056483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042751115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249976768","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0037","title":"The role of the courts in the political constitution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Principal (computer security); Constitutional law; Enforcement; Judicial independence; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.0070442479614752545,"score_gpt":0.22683069639267164,"score_spread":0.21978644843119638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249976768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11590423,0.0004563346,0.000011932316,0.008353258,0.00038763712,0.00007377452,0.000004515142,0.0000024856295,0.87480587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966884,0.00010848352,0.000016786842,0.00006347611,0.00010739702,2.8381693e-8,5.0359404e-8,3.270303e-7,0.000034587596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993918,0.00012164517,0.000065958215,0.00003232879,0.00026289263,0.00012540177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996142,0.00013059162,0.00006551525,0.000056247485,0.000102606275,0.000030841784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046858474,0.000027606644,0.000052748994,0.000003264897,0.0020457245,0.00001460385,0.0003560456,0.000032180575,0.00008020637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007774814,0.000015013512,0.00006106713,0.000022458402,0.0026574382,0.00011540437,0.000038275066,0.00014958685,0.0000010369481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009899763,0.000018767836,0.005058084,1.9982326e-7,0.0000081040525,0.0000011964872,0.0023920164,8.0222947e-7,0.00007418587,0.99166393,0.000120868855,0.0006519665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020293612,0.000017142484,0.04040336,0.000015969894,0.000026223724,0.000011086808,0.1281273,0.0000039244796,0.000044789787,0.13833788,0.6927654,0.000043999524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26409072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75531757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8837646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007733021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018945635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250144784","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1011","title":"METHODOLOGY AND PERSPECTIVE IN THE THEORY OF LAWYERS’ ETHICS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS WOOLLEY AND MARKOVITS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Adjudication; Identity (music); Sociology; Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.10050969560981,"score_gpt":0.41219862166908017,"score_spread":0.3116889260592702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250144784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7854529,0.00013070453,0.00018424522,0.11561943,0.00023049225,0.00015487477,0.0000040066834,0.0000035168393,0.09821986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935022,0.00008926554,0.005244915,0.00043500582,0.000031577536,9.1012296e-8,6.836846e-8,0.0000013734912,0.0006954798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695665,0.0026859385,0.000073475596,0.000064818894,0.00013961742,0.000079526384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966346,0.0028406428,0.00011282062,0.00006288282,0.00029545845,0.000053601918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009226384,0.000032616055,0.00008049766,0.00003861941,0.0005522041,0.000023335202,0.00015631395,0.00008405848,0.0003559212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032437767,0.000028457935,0.000017096065,0.000074904,0.00048292638,0.0004063906,0.00002848257,0.00058672053,4.014001e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040938906,0.000023882862,0.00038945157,0.0000014635813,0.000009158134,0.0000018186606,0.42671022,1.524416e-7,0.0004315326,0.57140297,0.00015523803,0.00046474193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002813671,0.00006833448,0.03174059,0.0000105897025,0.000016723036,0.000012217329,0.8617592,5.37604e-7,0.000014749621,0.013003356,0.09305094,0.00004138107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1126417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49960744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5583996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007040978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039609504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8932673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250264301","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2136","title":"Strange bedfellows","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nothing; Framing (construction); Charter; Political science; Law; Legislation; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01679811731214948,"score_gpt":0.24698094369839,"score_spread":0.23018282638624052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250264301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092929445,0.0006361457,0.00037140632,0.0019813906,0.00038734145,0.00008938405,0.0000040880877,0.000035627636,0.90356517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511355,0.00049308926,0.0013731152,0.000042353127,0.00024960242,1.3185593e-8,3.5298638e-7,0.00000236059,0.0027255844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992344,0.0001548674,0.000072708404,0.000072996794,0.00028211382,0.000182931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995122,0.000054042008,0.00009925165,0.00005298915,0.00014624435,0.00013526982],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037549651,0.00005596871,0.0001269699,0.000004772477,0.0015752442,0.000025802905,0.00026343166,0.000057161866,0.0018348391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040548788,0.000054001295,0.000106503496,0.000016692751,0.0003920821,0.00044697456,0.0000367196,0.00009343745,0.000017106158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012172295,0.00021826406,0.0074309194,0.00002745011,0.0003402196,0.00003671471,0.2744474,0.00004419737,0.00061862497,0.64054567,0.026033701,0.0501351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038975145,0.00005040278,0.0069759325,0.000015991523,0.000031765077,0.0000013678665,0.045855727,0.0000105668005,0.000012336205,0.00035800933,0.9462027,0.000095474774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29045784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5589228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.920169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032530673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021043887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250408531","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0024","title":"The Teacher","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affection; Sociology; Law; Rigour; Humanity; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019947039724658742,"score_gpt":0.31696612613223707,"score_spread":0.29701908640757835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250408531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048347646,0.00017353377,0.0005538575,0.015527865,0.00038925104,0.000023295068,2.6139438e-7,0.0000068060813,0.97849035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97537094,0.00023208447,0.0007056061,0.0001237631,0.0002401323,3.989871e-9,1.6310592e-7,0.0000012550565,0.023326034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995908,0.000070401344,0.00005685465,0.00002605013,0.00015708084,0.00009881461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999482,0.00013264311,0.00009693144,0.00004750501,0.00017884096,0.00006212946],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014316578,0.000018549868,0.000025966223,0.0000056217114,0.0022213415,0.000051193172,0.00017810939,0.00002645737,0.002354381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001052182,0.000016059068,0.000028946184,0.00003262539,0.00020971133,0.0006129274,0.000009428075,0.00015537026,0.000011417455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023090293,0.000033852048,0.00056725246,2.9186367e-7,0.00001596553,0.00000266047,0.02537956,3.7875864e-7,0.000017449553,0.9331527,0.023208924,0.017597912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006618118,0.000006724499,0.002669073,0.0000015122148,0.00000536274,0.0000019563045,0.08381604,5.137602e-7,0.0000037270208,0.0005802024,0.9128293,0.000019414843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18158036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.638037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019914187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001920429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251224987","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0046","title":"'To heap distress upon distress?: 'Comparative reflections on interest-rate ceilings","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Financial literacy; Economics; Redistribution (election); Politics; House of Commons; Interest rate; Law and economics; Political economy; Public economics; Political science; Monetary economics; Law; Finance; Parliament","score_opus":0.047540486916349566,"score_gpt":0.26009263057957366,"score_spread":0.21255214366322409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251224987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73220277,0.00012421534,0.001270961,0.0005884596,0.0010094873,0.000088570945,0.00018806169,0.000022105887,0.26450536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644524,0.00015035461,0.0011437107,0.00011391938,0.00018014798,1.7498846e-7,0.0000079628835,0.000010668947,0.0019478353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991569,0.000025585847,0.00027409225,0.0002553591,0.000042269752,0.00024581942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991029,0.00003658604,0.0003466248,0.00023807959,0.00007734415,0.00019845423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020806782,0.00014406187,0.00034262065,0.000069753594,0.0005357827,0.00006366346,0.0003486856,0.00009760509,0.0010288443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008147987,0.00017395189,0.00016143,0.000059125636,0.000111272406,0.00043735362,0.00006172562,0.00036447978,0.00013801642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046316825,0.0004618888,0.0011261154,0.000021128304,0.00015056787,0.0000678586,0.013147827,0.00031125618,0.0020140032,0.9743769,0.006396128,0.0014631136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009478142,0.00030518454,0.0109083885,0.00007209868,0.000016104197,0.000025311314,0.0012040285,0.00016535248,0.000645434,0.0015385298,0.9838272,0.00034457567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019056214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1760557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97743106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023381044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015480862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251434993","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0014","title":"Index to Volume 58","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02522958638035363,"score_gpt":0.16715563764747376,"score_spread":0.14192605126712013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251434993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044274505,0.0007087812,0.0015897781,0.0002256763,0.0010879379,0.000050867875,0.0000887042,0.00001161514,0.9519621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8081828,0.00042766467,0.0011722965,0.000113341746,0.00007843817,3.4008565e-8,7.294948e-7,0.000004977928,0.19001976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945104,0.0000052622913,0.00017774099,0.00016210377,0.000031205862,0.00017266137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951327,0.00000699455,0.00017333032,0.00013096507,0.000043046115,0.00013241723],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020039854,0.00006579689,0.00022808707,0.000042261898,0.00046408386,0.000015960824,0.0002696908,0.000036688925,0.027190126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011843078,0.00008757994,0.000115451854,0.000029249091,0.00013264622,0.00040793387,0.00010068952,0.00006165862,0.0031190533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009287569,0.00011995633,0.059782434,0.000007347967,0.00021478845,0.00007354133,0.009135383,0.00033729902,0.0000066894954,0.14344321,0.786121,0.0006654706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044455475,0.000046524667,0.022258392,0.000005227008,0.000003826586,0.000024083884,0.0020920637,0.00012492233,0.0000025959253,0.00043235277,0.97444856,0.00011690703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016607102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036444257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76390827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023995231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013002109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251762122","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.001","title":"EMPIRE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE REAL SPANISH CONTRIBUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; International law; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Law; Humanism; Natural law; Politics; Vocabulary; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04463799458015297,"score_gpt":0.21915463777847477,"score_spread":0.1745166431983218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251762122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029961457,0.00026419235,0.000025980695,0.0017577525,0.0005731939,0.000046668272,0.000055142962,0.000012597466,0.96730304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973726,0.00030406285,0.000043064283,0.00026070263,0.00046462737,2.5612838e-8,0.0000040498167,0.000002522542,0.0015482889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958587,0.000045140612,0.00008592124,0.000063452346,0.00011168586,0.0001079374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996413,0.000027788426,0.00006775189,0.000056678902,0.00012467812,0.00008182534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010123384,0.000055624976,0.00008280399,0.0000048530474,0.00054825784,0.00003754987,0.00017196657,0.000027641232,0.0061860927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000049558753,0.000041120165,0.00006770886,0.0000023975501,0.00048210143,0.0003268784,0.0000548799,0.000102383645,0.0000073632937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080052334,0.00004826538,0.00013585135,0.0000017628072,0.000055004675,0.000008917589,0.005012818,4.391942e-8,0.0000040231716,0.993833,0.00041499894,0.00040525018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006656727,0.000122029836,0.0022177005,0.000024650004,0.00005966403,0.000026622103,0.004434611,0.000014457027,0.000021360145,0.11404986,0.87827265,0.00009073597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021178082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03743182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005542133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068688564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99472237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251764200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.93","title":"Redressing the Right Wrong: The Argument from Corrective Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Indigenous; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022258492148469238,"score_gpt":0.2682911348908973,"score_spread":0.24603264274242806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251764200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2159215,0.012373758,0.00050354365,0.015333625,0.0041696676,0.00041551594,0.000024124303,0.000047556572,0.7512107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965931,0.0006063057,0.00038869833,0.00010466753,0.0007805995,7.80509e-8,4.889634e-7,0.000002676357,0.001523389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876606,0.00040750878,0.000088299836,0.00007247775,0.00039765937,0.00026796912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910396,0.00034208302,0.00019477433,0.00009008099,0.00015538321,0.00011372247],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006293116,0.0000759107,0.000116923045,0.0000029549478,0.0058577,0.000060935738,0.00043370918,0.000051075618,0.0014999569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081810234,0.00004330632,0.00010631489,0.000026221405,0.0007316932,0.00069610396,0.000104006846,0.0002016543,0.000014017553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011782767,0.00016176689,0.004185916,0.000004991766,0.0004812226,0.000012102334,0.8648837,0.00003298977,0.00015043063,0.08522715,0.036517795,0.008224071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024150732,0.000015930638,0.029333571,0.000027538359,0.0002561441,0.0000023675464,0.39931,0.000010721722,0.000038658007,0.0002285287,0.5704445,0.00009051012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31348264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23898336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7806716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081156165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003386231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251865052","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0031","title":"Index to Volume 59","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Computer science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.016139228396103083,"score_gpt":0.17292880075427064,"score_spread":0.15678957235816757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251865052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013981131,0.0006561118,0.0017531065,0.0006431492,0.0008191157,0.000050433733,0.0000642151,0.000011612713,0.98202115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8973117,0.00017829359,0.0011904833,0.00026597662,0.00007772083,1.5129801e-8,6.961933e-7,0.0000030916667,0.100972034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994604,0.0000047384096,0.00017373415,0.00015912944,0.000028149887,0.00017386812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995328,0.0000050434874,0.00016857847,0.00012827624,0.00003745084,0.00012785816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002509069,0.00006564227,0.00021903946,0.00004127413,0.00027697493,0.00003466408,0.00027344262,0.000035546822,0.016535046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010691961,0.00008662904,0.00010947196,0.000028842525,0.0000568233,0.0004151777,0.00005235466,0.00005989148,0.0019762916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111945046,0.00015619783,0.01131317,0.00000512044,0.00015133535,0.000030510908,0.0077374927,0.00029417465,0.000014818352,0.5121943,0.46273452,0.0052564624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044190732,0.000094140465,0.023319652,0.0000075575945,0.000005218985,0.0000062106424,0.0018975217,0.00015358042,0.0000029088997,0.0029153018,0.97103137,0.0001246285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062512998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022731866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023546991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008327162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252389196","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.623","title":"TREBILCOCK ON TAX AVOIDANCE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Tax law; Tax avoidance; Income tax; Law; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Tax reform; Engineering","score_opus":0.007172937373887382,"score_gpt":0.18780731705785964,"score_spread":0.18063437968397225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252389196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2427236,0.00004582958,0.00011575086,0.0006926914,0.00062764913,0.000041094543,0.000001612499,0.00003125615,0.7557205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99519217,0.000010733297,0.0003932283,0.0003731068,0.0006391188,1.1518489e-8,0.0000012247639,0.0000044916374,0.0033859243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995945,0.0000051852976,0.00007127914,0.00007670122,0.00015112109,0.000101180376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995593,0.0000109787425,0.00020240466,0.00009672303,0.000113771726,0.000016863352],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011498286,0.000062515144,0.000090086265,0.000025179592,0.00032470847,0.00007197557,0.00020964463,0.00004088052,0.0055732583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002149615,0.000062278195,0.00006814269,0.000024116145,0.00005953437,0.0011376746,0.000035414298,0.00017479823,0.0001436063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017790003,0.00017765888,0.0038478952,0.00002653013,0.00003878462,0.00004893439,0.00050033396,0.000038977512,0.0034504826,0.9432372,0.03764473,0.010810572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004489353,0.0000132661835,0.00857307,0.000016458514,0.000015230457,0.0000032485177,0.00072776404,0.000107482665,0.000065018,0.00037030724,0.9895787,0.000080491765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044652686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13118796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.951934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002792947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000074503496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99533576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252601561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.663","title":"WHY IS THIS TAKING SO LONG? THE MOVE TOWARD A NATIONAL SECURITIES REGULATOR","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regulator; Business; Law and economics; Regulatory authority; Accounting; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.025818973041209305,"score_gpt":0.28586492119223617,"score_spread":0.2600459481510269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252601561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09686298,0.0012660823,0.00022723373,0.015711801,0.00087596104,0.00010455111,0.00003336454,0.000020101343,0.88489795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950292,0.00029488208,0.00026514474,0.0008182406,0.00042632694,7.574189e-8,6.069322e-7,0.0000024702817,0.0031630672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990603,0.00007187661,0.00009164794,0.00008165865,0.0005654382,0.00012912405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989921,0.0001043163,0.00018530135,0.00005345339,0.00060782157,0.00005704928],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003765087,0.000061481696,0.00010015618,0.000013342818,0.0020372097,0.00008813627,0.00038253696,0.000043665463,0.00826269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005907826,0.000052510986,0.000119509976,0.000024224384,0.0007527004,0.0005792692,0.000073232295,0.00017717987,0.00000861214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029785686,0.000031080235,0.0008715033,0.0000022877882,0.00010998961,0.0000042789,0.059857532,0.0000019667566,0.00006076495,0.8263418,0.11211004,0.0005789731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001732411,0.000019057765,0.0056968117,0.000016296497,0.000014466363,0.000005815251,0.015399725,0.000027445705,0.000059259975,0.0040049506,0.9745149,0.000068025794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11100772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52084786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8981662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019187378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001351674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252619127","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.265","title":"LORD WRIGHT AND INNOVATIVE TRADITIONALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Law; Restitution; Tort; Duty; Law and economics; Statutory law; Sociology; Appeal; Political science; Liability; Economics; History","score_opus":0.014778380003170836,"score_gpt":0.25242463714073543,"score_spread":0.2376462571375646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252619127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055314805,0.00027544677,0.0009428134,0.007595528,0.000052386935,0.00006578857,0.000015403453,0.000014184371,0.93572366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973993,0.00027700668,0.0012091618,0.00013775911,0.0000999464,9.212807e-9,0.0000010972711,7.8308744e-7,0.000874967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996665,0.000030322411,0.000050919803,0.00004947737,0.00012605873,0.000076693585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996835,0.00001764652,0.000064453714,0.000032846103,0.00012712786,0.00007441267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014100652,0.000028877435,0.00005498191,0.0000074790587,0.0008156672,0.000021383166,0.000112163754,0.000028672965,0.00076316035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005111807,0.00003053436,0.000022997676,0.00003407407,0.000190256,0.00039873598,0.000008379073,0.00006225647,0.0000027574376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071182694,0.000028409635,0.00004178262,4.209575e-7,0.0000070979813,0.0000034782915,0.0073314467,7.754659e-7,0.00006521014,0.98627335,0.0021369085,0.0041040075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030585873,0.00004052885,0.012504606,0.000009619605,0.000010008384,0.000006517699,0.010484587,0.0000063014886,0.000018107454,0.020496963,0.9560497,0.00006720724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018886982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027882524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9657764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110620094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051550676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98985606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252727894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1003","title":"THREE ISSUES IN LEGAL ETHICS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Law; Adjudication; Jury; Political science; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03897483545341218,"score_gpt":0.3586189794483755,"score_spread":0.3196441439949633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252727894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056336652,0.00010716417,0.000263902,0.1049134,0.0011962743,0.00005488013,0.0000021254277,0.000014376147,0.83711123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925078,0.00019284022,0.004350432,0.00023173014,0.00025964755,1.5918012e-8,5.559353e-7,0.0000019729418,0.0024549814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947315,0.000085097454,0.00007592695,0.000048951082,0.0002166956,0.00010017333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993923,0.00012607907,0.00009796527,0.000064670756,0.00025077004,0.00006821873],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010701645,0.000029967674,0.000057197343,0.000019762603,0.00076934986,0.00006818013,0.00021710094,0.00009951806,0.005452257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031919224,0.000035002355,0.000029573379,0.000054319516,0.00023426658,0.0015316397,0.000015780644,0.00090405694,0.000012284934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011393285,0.000053356558,0.0017399489,0.0000012157697,0.0000059104163,0.0000061657843,0.034084607,0.0000010326272,0.00012617992,0.9579858,0.0045620175,0.001422373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014202404,0.000010765836,0.0053029577,0.0000056782656,0.0000047954454,0.0000036604858,0.02503524,0.0000041297985,0.000009248137,0.0027231395,0.9667168,0.00004155433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7211011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9621548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011128767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061815075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253009809","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.147","title":"A HEGELIAN CRIMINAL LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Scholarship; Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Law; Rendering (computer graphics); Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04431641068584398,"score_gpt":0.20805710705676297,"score_spread":0.16374069637091898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253009809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105405286,0.00015299334,0.00033347416,0.00008002017,0.00035894438,0.000044533397,0.000009790016,0.00002775641,0.89358723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972226,0.00011611024,0.0013233522,0.00019826979,0.000055700282,1.01231326e-8,1.3078092e-7,0.0000044687954,0.0010793736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993628,0.0000595298,0.000089646004,0.00012684168,0.00018159574,0.00017954045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995713,0.000015719746,0.00009883688,0.0001239033,0.000043487515,0.00014671196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000080019745,0.00007336572,0.00010433975,0.000012047176,0.00045537474,0.0000124229355,0.0003920529,0.000038307957,0.0045964113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000113266915,0.00007259532,0.000101791586,0.000019924577,0.00027084208,0.00060389034,0.00006600402,0.000112958114,0.000043616295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002919917,0.00037075195,0.00025642957,0.000025796335,0.000021065345,0.0010970135,0.011216385,0.0000029168339,0.057787083,0.9214171,0.0023625535,0.005150925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047100806,0.0021443353,0.01116133,0.00025702236,0.00032827453,0.0023322632,0.017033014,0.00020003367,0.20982471,0.016478058,0.7343371,0.0011937998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03684162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0330552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90493906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007215215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002067583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253206351","doi":"10.3138/temp-utlj-barkow","title":"LAW VERSUS POLITICS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Discretion; Law; Politics; Criminal justice; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Legal doctrine; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.04343393329329004,"score_gpt":0.2977326394517626,"score_spread":0.25429870615847255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253206351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026638094,0.0009690221,0.00009108496,0.0009304466,0.00093033473,0.000030670155,0.000003462285,0.000015560541,0.97039133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698824,0.00027946936,0.00078801345,0.000056305424,0.0004824778,5.432802e-9,2.9938155e-7,0.0000023678658,0.0014027955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992398,0.00008869747,0.00006440614,0.000046797468,0.00026911777,0.00029117733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993933,0.00007700552,0.000072897245,0.000071038,0.00010206267,0.00028369026],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003769983,0.00004597513,0.0000860646,0.0000056994877,0.0012284125,0.000022865152,0.0002443883,0.000052949494,0.0020711226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024480485,0.0000524073,0.00008126082,0.000014401268,0.00042145076,0.0010819483,0.000038249607,0.00008416034,0.000027672004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045912024,0.000034138564,0.00030689253,0.0000028908307,0.000015677244,0.0000062307868,0.010691139,7.31605e-7,0.000014711135,0.98628384,0.0021648717,0.00043294867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029582396,0.000048848633,0.0005336021,0.00001515697,0.000045150922,0.0000053116987,0.032092962,7.55928e-7,0.00002288651,0.0005209437,0.96634823,0.000070328286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3463433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37184495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003770361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055254306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253339146","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.179","title":"ERNIE'S THREE WORLDS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035658198521737815,"score_gpt":0.24481946985963499,"score_spread":0.20916127133789716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253339146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01863964,0.00013995914,0.0015058166,0.00039645442,0.00008683474,0.000043255623,0.0000031717314,0.00001589008,0.97916895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400306,0.00016019875,0.002984895,0.000028046099,0.00009602806,1.8462936e-8,2.1710703e-7,0.0000020645007,0.0027254515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959326,0.000030995772,0.00005545966,0.000054685814,0.00014696996,0.000118656244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996297,0.000011409661,0.00007966481,0.00007722962,0.00008412681,0.00011786572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020050012,0.000032502285,0.000060693677,0.0000063438624,0.00086849293,0.0000136533745,0.00031187435,0.00003493187,0.0054911915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004898101,0.000035206285,0.00006538049,0.000020526024,0.00021170905,0.00036434754,0.000038615017,0.00007275022,0.000024761352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016355816,0.000050557926,0.0023674236,0.0000010269875,0.000019166218,0.000007772847,0.015298426,8.134782e-7,0.000021205151,0.97650725,0.0012571557,0.004452842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020289094,0.000026511927,0.015406624,0.000008303137,0.000021283666,0.0000025256381,0.011140871,0.000005756798,0.00001632476,0.005542297,0.96755755,0.00006907517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2977756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7502186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014038943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059346905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99541795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253351290","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0000","title":"The judicial invention of property norms: Ellickson’s whalemen revisited","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014654528245273529,"score_gpt":0.24124766129125105,"score_spread":0.22659313304597753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253351290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0699192,0.0006119946,0.00049860764,0.00796278,0.0001487031,0.0005012328,0.000010196305,0.000020990128,0.9203263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942405,0.001214943,0.00036272383,0.000027862896,0.00012816765,1.5652975e-7,9.4410456e-7,0.0000021689768,0.004022529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993944,0.0000924498,0.00012037424,0.00005475223,0.00021792462,0.00012009877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993386,0.000028913204,0.0001988065,0.000089660054,0.00026773667,0.00007623343],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003984283,0.0000357827,0.000078688936,0.0000061860164,0.0012765422,0.00003979714,0.00031727616,0.000035386583,0.0012200711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020058565,0.0000239649,0.00007794541,0.000033300454,0.0002813783,0.0004844424,0.000044586093,0.00007357448,0.0000146940765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054648946,0.00015960612,0.0023937214,0.000017762883,0.00011100186,0.0000019004831,0.019566258,0.000009640626,0.0013790036,0.90074867,0.03335968,0.042198084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022617671,0.000042010848,0.003936682,0.000028652823,0.000023971648,9.256394e-7,0.017419586,0.000041125615,0.00003338557,0.0030309695,0.9751629,0.00005361565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29076323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2278789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016120091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073514995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253863679","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016.0001","title":"Decomposing <i>Bhasin v Hrynew</i>  : Towards an institutional understanding of the general organizing principle of good faith in contractual performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Faith; Political science; Common law; Fair dealing; Subject (documents); Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Good faith; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04354523155426537,"score_gpt":0.2984003652038038,"score_spread":0.25485513364953843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253863679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.924033,0.00003268065,0.0008522515,0.0003499507,0.00009683834,0.00007432887,0.000010530444,0.0000032116538,0.074547194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844354,0.00008182546,0.0013189735,0.000009554907,0.00006122074,2.436698e-8,5.136679e-7,0.0000023560945,0.000081983664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993208,0.000062707724,0.00014799603,0.00007453734,0.0002625763,0.00013135067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992916,0.000018363098,0.00036639135,0.00015153289,0.00010674196,0.00006538419],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044963002,0.000049867314,0.00012522364,0.000012804525,0.0020283759,0.000040436218,0.0005893134,0.000048413,0.00008572099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027308597,0.000045661352,0.000056619167,0.000027014261,0.00060467975,0.00096729334,0.00010742267,0.000116913834,1.8578251e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048774073,0.00012585093,0.04862637,0.000012102362,0.00002592894,0.0000023582247,0.010941683,0.00047437273,0.0032459688,0.9355513,0.000009199901,0.00093609636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032997732,0.00019556924,0.88700753,0.00041351863,0.00009682402,0.00002536844,0.04165563,0.002111877,0.0045837923,0.0028255451,0.057422023,0.00036254406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06913392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22077776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9327257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056063954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037594695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254039495","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.81","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW AT THE MARGINS: LAW, POWER, AND PREROGATIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.011029377175947543,"score_gpt":0.2473415289119836,"score_spread":0.23631215173603606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254039495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024486154,0.020387791,0.000010690629,0.007493951,0.00041792582,0.0001364324,0.000012718775,0.0000093473345,0.94704497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736192,0.024821993,0.00010378055,0.0006106439,0.00018990251,7.3190705e-8,4.2538554e-7,0.0000016282995,0.00065234496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994052,0.000087787375,0.00007075698,0.00007145524,0.00024312554,0.00012167679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955624,0.000064844746,0.00010158503,0.000050507828,0.00014727795,0.000079543686],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041156955,0.000050236526,0.00011936161,0.0000032188657,0.0029288495,0.000014737369,0.00018061051,0.00003702358,0.0020666933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045110508,0.000039698367,0.00006690548,0.000020216945,0.0019793492,0.0002604425,0.00009966474,0.00013281913,0.000008362402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022662294,0.000017957113,0.00038571074,0.0000050989797,0.0000472197,0.000008385931,0.004999433,8.132039e-8,0.00003614633,0.987698,0.005631368,0.0011479422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001850233,0.000031508906,0.004097884,0.00010785734,0.000057205005,0.000010668225,0.0068732747,1.4655016e-7,0.000005445652,0.006073381,0.9824937,0.00006392185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20904116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85459894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010834189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007070608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254078437","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.337","title":"Response to Ian Shapiro, ‘On Non-domination’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03401959761954053,"score_gpt":0.29999730937931274,"score_spread":0.2659777117597722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254078437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08495134,0.000054539025,0.00037696733,0.021774642,0.00043445037,0.000073558316,0.0000092819755,0.000012524775,0.8923127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965955,0.00001676103,0.0005619648,0.0006804324,0.00033788194,1.8055857e-8,2.0963364e-7,0.0000025529034,0.0018046494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902934,0.00026798536,0.000067697794,0.000056040277,0.00031489573,0.00026403906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991313,0.0001733373,0.000049009614,0.00007306136,0.00011061691,0.00046265018],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013917991,0.00004717986,0.00008490063,0.000021041378,0.00093946327,0.000016842934,0.00023097119,0.00008301863,0.0011275057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002143558,0.000052339114,0.0000708306,0.00002868756,0.00023120329,0.0005347893,0.00003254655,0.00014084924,0.00007393821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057843,0.000105294035,0.00017828618,0.00000222297,0.000016075666,0.000008457298,0.051397234,0.000004086319,0.0001911441,0.9437052,0.002993231,0.0008203307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060263363,0.0002544514,0.013528794,0.000047329264,0.000026977452,0.00000412408,0.024777753,0.000004362252,0.00010568882,0.010703503,0.94977736,0.00016699023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017995209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019210674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94678414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005485486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008062863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254144971","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0003","title":"Pandectism and the Gaian classification of things","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Slavic languages; Media studies; Sociology; History; Classics; Social science; Library science; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.0107399347739563,"score_gpt":0.1724584517980768,"score_spread":0.16171851702412052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254144971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84848523,0.008176129,0.000887157,0.00031690803,0.00033456975,0.00008794003,0.000006732834,0.0000064926317,0.14169882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991598,0.00032261823,0.00028728863,0.000018093933,0.00004517144,2.1209023e-9,0.0000010980324,4.2098165e-7,0.000165512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962276,0.00007779206,0.00007739007,0.00003282291,0.00011135041,0.0000778836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996756,0.00004036899,0.00014422467,0.000050057686,0.00003536589,0.00005442042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047386248,0.000030360248,0.00007842874,0.0000064158253,0.00022663812,0.0000068485733,0.000077675606,0.000025410933,0.000545735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000055984456,0.000021285172,0.000035023306,0.000011241042,0.00014960367,0.0005395518,0.00000476377,0.000053299245,0.0000030751949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035992326,0.00003212852,0.84593457,0.00003525916,0.000094496725,0.0000018277855,0.020689163,0.000033079825,0.00016977564,0.061557334,0.0010531475,0.0700393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052634726,0.000034380017,0.98181796,0.000018539225,0.000022456821,0.000046646583,0.0065631466,0.0008141642,0.000004198965,0.00038196138,0.009736466,0.00003374712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10904383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050782166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15067454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005975851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009599426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9665386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254361771","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.761","title":"BASIC RIGHTS AND SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW: THE INCEST CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Public law; Political science; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Comparative law; Legislator; Criminalization; Constitutional law; Common law; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal justice; Legislation","score_opus":0.04254894311437708,"score_gpt":0.26682160793049053,"score_spread":0.22427266481611347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254361771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4872637,0.0002938439,0.00001776235,0.00015058895,0.00010445885,0.000045730012,0.000006861725,0.0000070408464,0.51211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986467,0.00013344674,0.00025153786,0.000066008906,0.000136029,1.8045524e-8,1.9287063e-7,0.0000022214335,0.00076385704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930465,0.00018064186,0.00007725823,0.000082767074,0.00017195336,0.00018274662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994713,0.00007047904,0.000104557614,0.00008031915,0.00011489638,0.00015843581],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036478482,0.00006546019,0.00010165306,0.000009308419,0.0024745935,0.000032372256,0.00022916845,0.000050840663,0.0013003582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000066182492,0.00005205694,0.00006281183,0.000019705289,0.0010979333,0.00052221474,0.000042065407,0.00011982578,0.000004934347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007164025,0.000030023784,0.0001261437,0.000003210194,0.000021250831,0.00071321847,0.13155402,4.922759e-8,0.000005297874,0.8664174,0.00036073575,0.0006970124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000786131,0.0002942475,0.0033114897,0.000047410176,0.0003579266,0.0016145756,0.27159715,0.0000044227017,0.00012568281,0.014947805,0.7066518,0.00026135196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8640803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94536525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8514696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011789877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055959827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254376792","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.037","title":"DISTINCTIONS OF POWER AND THE POWER OF DISTINCTIONS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR KOSKENNIEMI","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Rationalization (economics); Power (physics); Epistemology; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Pretext; Law; Empire; Sociology; Political science; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029781548179835825,"score_gpt":0.22118174203996982,"score_spread":0.191400193860134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254376792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49712607,0.0007066838,0.00027248962,0.0042440053,0.00077397155,0.00032534567,0.00027276302,0.000017966435,0.4962607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752134,0.00003227475,0.00016903231,0.00006720267,0.000053310432,1.6140488e-7,6.372644e-7,0.000004116625,0.0021519095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928993,0.00017302307,0.00019121708,0.00007784769,0.00014906512,0.000118893455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923074,0.00017657675,0.00014674547,0.00013045954,0.00020316259,0.000112336485],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029760654,0.00007402059,0.0001918349,0.000017210969,0.00039510298,0.000009133349,0.00016786045,0.00002974916,0.006801883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007123909,0.000052025098,0.00013200041,0.000013557244,0.00097236194,0.00016788983,0.000080957274,0.00010864908,0.000003688833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034578498,0.0002061675,0.00008701631,0.000011480499,0.00008865912,0.0000036584534,0.030443091,1.5380637e-7,0.000031933396,0.9650001,0.00059688475,0.00007300393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004627342,0.0016394937,0.021150231,0.0002965638,0.0003938282,0.000050986335,0.0675809,0.0000076107326,0.00015179095,0.076821126,0.82695395,0.00032619125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004710613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043283743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88817894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036023408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018975375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99410605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254409687","doi":"10.3138/utlj.022814ra","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012708497647286716,"score_gpt":0.1926830216063101,"score_spread":0.17997452395902339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254409687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013336932,0.1408673,0.00020642814,0.0009279792,0.00032864037,0.000049710703,0.000008482988,0.00001827183,0.85745984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21763164,0.13966738,0.0019892054,0.06658496,0.0049790707,2.3098883e-7,0.000047867823,0.000059692695,0.56903994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953693,0.00006362531,0.00010738855,0.00006278796,0.0001319053,0.00009734646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956703,0.000029382676,0.00008623475,0.00008922668,0.00015739813,0.00007071178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015235908,0.000058169207,0.00013548761,0.000009245795,0.00045589745,0.000034425382,0.0001514525,0.000015124027,0.058415513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008501521,0.00005748235,0.000096752265,0.0000030837753,0.00014259398,0.0007261987,0.000013375756,0.000064091946,0.00003508549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012858931,0.000028215582,0.0000047278895,0.00010468958,0.00002701149,0.000007648844,0.013998327,5.5716214e-7,0.0000024732344,0.5127796,0.47017986,0.0028540234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024026971,0.00006731469,0.00004245043,0.00031463456,0.00004644113,0.0000126105815,0.0020414589,0.000013160968,0.0000017206662,0.00035666043,0.99679357,0.00006971951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00469173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014098063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5266137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004255566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014107943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9424452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254710195","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.119","title":"CHOICES AND APPROACHES: ANTI-TERRORISM LAW AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM AFTER SEPTEMBER 11","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Civil liberties; Law; Political science; Kingdom; Civil society; Commission; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Counter terrorism; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.06355987544218396,"score_gpt":0.2555994116095605,"score_spread":0.19203953616737657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254710195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972268,0.0006898985,0.000032860284,0.0010309671,0.000038183378,0.0001144048,0.000004099226,0.0000068248323,0.02581479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997802,0.0014702393,0.00019004225,0.00038754052,0.000038496848,1.6487272e-7,0.0000013114264,0.0000030697367,0.0001071349],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999029,0.00036220497,0.000101315214,0.00011899272,0.00020653075,0.00018196611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994614,0.00020186137,0.00010694691,0.000084099585,0.00006174841,0.00008393961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001113613,0.0000879352,0.00014253793,0.000016973296,0.0009726433,0.0000936932,0.00022962756,0.00006859626,0.00015107385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010081293,0.000058535636,0.00005286117,0.0000664786,0.0018547064,0.00059040694,0.00008594867,0.00016490537,3.4716857e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003803376,0.00010664849,0.043738667,0.000059743736,0.00011128613,0.00005222474,0.6947969,0.000008269611,0.0000052295763,0.25941813,0.0010468655,0.0002756757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020524573,0.00009010868,0.08951489,0.00015285151,0.00021894832,0.000046058678,0.45696267,0.00044100813,0.0000046347773,0.0021317266,0.44814458,0.00024005676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5726361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6480589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44709772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045870365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017884868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7480885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254802156","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.059","title":"COMBATING TERRORIST FINANCING: IS CANADA'S LEGAL REGIME EFFECTIVE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Commission; Money laundering; Convention; Political science; Finance; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Business; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.011249892374082306,"score_gpt":0.20787374230447425,"score_spread":0.19662384993039195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254802156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10506747,0.00047524183,0.00011511472,0.0056228875,0.0005508347,0.00015202204,0.00010077956,0.000015204513,0.8879005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927156,0.00006115726,0.00031844806,0.0005568516,0.00013334474,2.639628e-8,2.1160324e-7,0.00000343594,0.0062109455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925965,0.00009016223,0.00008094613,0.00008924583,0.00024392681,0.00023608615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993943,0.000037372058,0.00018636402,0.00008472335,0.00009061207,0.00020665608],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023880503,0.00006148244,0.0001212701,0.000008611481,0.0010348608,0.000016826707,0.00029301713,0.00004826507,0.0011093272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042167892,0.00007504011,0.00006662257,0.000028908462,0.0002118524,0.00040497372,0.000026191186,0.00012247289,0.0000020836314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015578132,0.000074498974,0.005095065,0.000021598029,0.000123385,0.0005423187,0.121181294,0.0000026140303,0.00003663656,0.3792027,0.48167327,0.011890843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029061898,0.0000449447,0.017976472,0.000039753715,0.000017146122,0.000011780798,0.0071601854,0.000004213102,0.00006739993,0.00023235292,0.9740504,0.00010473956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8876481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011437475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007269707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255801062","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.65","title":"THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF AN EXTERMINATORY LEGALITY: LAW AND THE HOLOCAUST","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nazism; The Holocaust; Political science; Judaism; Impossibility; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.011502320031210907,"score_gpt":0.2558543895657031,"score_spread":0.2443520695344922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255801062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35279968,0.0040435772,0.000033851735,0.0046079867,0.00016815905,0.000121316785,0.000006435201,0.000009550024,0.63820946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989595,0.00071110553,0.000041233834,0.00012386378,0.000069154594,1.4672021e-8,7.734371e-8,4.9810933e-7,0.00009458807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929166,0.00023414,0.00009050441,0.000060587285,0.00021809478,0.00010498975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951726,0.000097669596,0.00011220864,0.00007700538,0.00013699713,0.000058851798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010878233,0.000039861632,0.00010773828,0.0000026641428,0.0030833986,0.000028631197,0.00023520052,0.00003085887,0.000037212154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002982116,0.000025395686,0.00006296058,0.000016388009,0.004135294,0.00035777767,0.000033723336,0.00007851305,2.5983513e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013196874,0.000027384116,0.00017869791,6.480837e-7,0.000018490016,0.000003945509,0.005651711,5.856572e-7,0.0000095248,0.9880636,0.000057127243,0.0058563645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026848565,0.0003830977,0.11232584,0.000058532063,0.00019380343,0.000028064356,0.17087135,0.000020185635,0.000059320246,0.39109167,0.32204804,0.00023521643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23906294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4699548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64615977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008596563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074982134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255813588","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0014","title":"Contents: volume LIV, 2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.025887185600513837,"score_gpt":0.18449456161820066,"score_spread":0.15860737601768682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255813588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011241559,0.024511812,0.0006074123,0.00013105555,0.008531323,0.00010852915,0.0022229573,0.000009585857,0.9637649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007257139,0.008114806,0.00046781084,0.00009045715,0.00033135377,1.0256293e-7,0.00004394219,0.00002046367,0.98367393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862164,0.000015025045,0.0005030428,0.0004195028,0.000066063156,0.00037472692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826896,0.00001392494,0.0011020674,0.00030319506,0.00012604833,0.00018577497],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032812217,0.00024554157,0.0008545304,0.00008754411,0.0005515356,0.00009338246,0.0007248142,0.00025388759,0.2565451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015372194,0.00032643342,0.00046821244,0.000033174223,0.00036604097,0.00064498204,0.00019857046,0.00030155256,0.05646467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035217014,0.00008103067,0.00007092066,0.000036871832,0.00043778864,0.00002138193,0.0009480044,0.00018820871,5.0239066e-7,0.026690766,0.97135985,0.0001294756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011374094,0.000074773016,0.00012506265,0.00010765236,0.00003656141,0.000016275872,0.002396487,0.000018718772,0.0000012092614,0.00056072354,0.99520314,0.00032201002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07092026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00755771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20008042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014959959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007019748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255829909","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.845","title":"‘NECESSITY KNOWS NO LAW’: ON EXTREME CASES AND UNCODIFIABLE NECESSITIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontological ethics; Dignity; Normative; Context (archaeology); Torture; Consequentialism; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Human rights; History","score_opus":0.06945261550055411,"score_gpt":0.20941931047490123,"score_spread":0.1399666949743471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255829909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3268664,0.00036493596,0.000033437547,0.00004566447,0.00031520255,0.000049803417,0.000023004623,0.000027051332,0.67227453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957118,0.000518718,0.00048372243,0.0001717887,0.00006688208,2.9096263e-8,3.2513523e-7,0.0000056807276,0.0030410455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992017,0.00009554693,0.0001071003,0.0001866374,0.00020477915,0.00020422647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994057,0.0000941929,0.00013929675,0.000140609,0.00006433513,0.00015587268],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009390757,0.00011339441,0.0001615601,0.000017690547,0.00074519374,0.000029816236,0.00029046307,0.00005240237,0.0034283486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004030333,0.00010588454,0.000066712026,0.000022305961,0.0003717954,0.0008714118,0.00009540333,0.00013746851,0.000028255463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002078559,0.0014330808,0.0050684554,0.000163295,0.00008918778,0.0044436157,0.011237322,0.000029217075,0.075225055,0.8709763,0.01722334,0.012032577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007984648,0.005457243,0.026571663,0.0011510463,0.00033789125,0.002534764,0.016718637,0.0006895736,0.13306975,0.0069289315,0.7962409,0.0023149347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056648258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04128217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86404735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008515492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025026851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255938873","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1021","title":"PHILOSOPHICAL LEGAL ETHICS AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Democracy; Political science; Legal process; Sociology; Compromise; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.051558578290668754,"score_gpt":0.35012770066188137,"score_spread":0.29856912237121264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255938873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14610368,0.00007142857,0.00017294288,0.26113343,0.0009732907,0.00004821889,0.000006408102,0.000017519764,0.5914731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958428,0.00013465944,0.0022866018,0.000387822,0.0003601092,1.1546428e-8,6.582915e-7,0.0000016575223,0.0009856541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933815,0.00018781156,0.00006692804,0.0000645328,0.00024737045,0.00009520099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914116,0.000230376,0.00009266151,0.000043553388,0.00035069755,0.00014154224],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012349177,0.000037367936,0.000061853636,0.000013185888,0.0017838889,0.0000877951,0.00014282604,0.00014382842,0.003743702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005353498,0.0000409942,0.000035885525,0.00003141861,0.0005921087,0.0012566985,0.000022634742,0.0021107285,0.0000047218437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018817776,0.000047503006,0.0004409352,0.0000016471676,0.000013475821,0.000004246005,0.036764678,3.523007e-8,0.00013935324,0.9602637,0.0011809671,0.0011246386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019229058,0.000023657389,0.0024262122,0.000005165713,0.00001796077,0.000029479887,0.036014758,0.0000096837075,0.0000051978673,0.0052292636,0.9559865,0.00005982966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20910428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5122783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95503443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008017231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006916644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256174237","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.643","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF CONTRACT REMEDIES (AND WHY DO CONTRACTS PROFESSORS TEACH REMEDIES FIRST?)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Compensation (psychology); Incentive; Normative; Breach of contract; Contract theory; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01139003454695533,"score_gpt":0.2541324606851664,"score_spread":0.24274242613821104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256174237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7240837,0.0028823267,0.00027538277,0.017099043,0.0007537239,0.00039357337,0.000014916332,0.000028846966,0.25446847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751294,0.0012438446,0.00031906005,0.000013702787,0.00014376492,1.2003709e-7,2.5523266e-7,0.0000022245881,0.0007640622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993113,0.00007672284,0.00012698102,0.00007391639,0.0002568583,0.00015420809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990473,0.00022268113,0.00024914547,0.00010302698,0.0002780188,0.00009984375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086898176,0.000051418036,0.00011317593,0.000009027413,0.0022716739,0.000036421025,0.00027446586,0.00007299485,0.00013921618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017175141,0.000041286425,0.00005735557,0.000021972359,0.00094131986,0.00040161255,0.000045623667,0.00021992323,0.0000010006388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083648534,0.00007010851,0.0060367496,0.000008492857,0.0000650007,0.0000024864557,0.026932003,0.0000024234257,0.0017479762,0.9593296,0.002748925,0.0029726066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004601199,0.00004240468,0.026733415,0.000034592893,0.000045964094,0.0000040904342,0.061610818,0.000021811773,0.00006663746,0.0030594897,0.9078446,0.00007605086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16055721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7627324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015345034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011117367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256545904","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.389","title":"RECOGNIZING QUEBEC IN THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA: USING THE BILATERAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROCESS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; French; Political science; Constitutional law; Negotiation; Constitutional amendment; Population; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.023199667368727937,"score_gpt":0.21659417120346544,"score_spread":0.1933945038347375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256545904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71187276,0.00094435137,0.00033652293,0.0019091846,0.000536225,0.00020687447,0.00003438098,0.000004562582,0.28415516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993964,0.00012066366,0.000055422857,0.00005762811,0.00004630045,2.3635057e-8,4.6119575e-7,4.929862e-7,0.0003226047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934685,0.00011285171,0.000092821574,0.000044947585,0.00029174922,0.00011079774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965334,0.000030848187,0.0001199143,0.000040506948,0.00010944315,0.000045951274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003407652,0.000030109139,0.00007119249,0.000026500027,0.002350996,0.000021887294,0.00020198984,0.000025372092,0.00033897924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000179212,0.000027816606,0.00003586035,0.000044426964,0.00250605,0.00030437726,0.000008646468,0.000091311515,1.8936095e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094190036,0.00008702707,0.0041034343,0.000022230774,0.000069117596,0.00034102457,0.13626605,0.0019637013,0.00013461015,0.84757334,0.008557779,0.0007874995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007354748,0.000025393572,0.005516107,0.00012669037,0.000053299133,0.000198248,0.17961466,0.000065889086,0.000019016188,0.00036072734,0.8131285,0.00015599588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99969155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8472126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032330998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069156443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281652745","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0087","title":"Rethinking relational architecture: Interpersonal justice beyond private law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Private law; Interpersonal communication; Law; Political science; Public law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022216035721710926,"score_gpt":0.20841992088579064,"score_spread":0.1862038851640797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281652745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28363195,0.0007210739,0.007917271,0.0036566597,0.0026863434,0.00023944858,0.00017613363,0.00010882493,0.7008623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947078,0.00003122064,0.0031638583,0.000813752,0.00011998149,6.813947e-8,0.0000025613558,0.000007737407,0.0011530163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874014,0.00021328982,0.00013322903,0.00019173129,0.00052714144,0.00019445774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999442,0.00011940706,0.00018443623,0.00011628394,0.000034305227,0.00010356805],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002488509,0.0000919985,0.000117773525,0.00002375252,0.0020181597,0.000021575472,0.0004921812,0.0000319357,0.005026574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003697931,0.00010146536,0.00012597855,0.000047620535,0.00023879526,0.0004262062,0.00030105957,0.00050090946,0.000006544926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024852416,0.00010925111,0.00006658373,0.000015867321,0.000022086268,0.00033621312,0.008730687,0.0017872511,0.025516925,0.9604162,0.00132658,0.0014238456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026301544,0.00074911583,0.0010227301,0.00007948787,0.00021758773,0.0023721666,0.0042346343,0.0019220944,0.003707845,0.08348604,0.898955,0.0006231659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019809334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032283727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8976284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029899317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043995693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283330108","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2021-0091","title":"How victims matter: Rethinking the significance of the victim in criminal theory","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Retributive justice; Criminology; Criminal law; Psychology; Law and economics; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.01627710178796654,"score_gpt":0.19214840109803924,"score_spread":0.1758712993100727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283330108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966661,0.00048595882,0.0004119426,0.0071311514,0.0010200951,0.00030524793,0.000038775124,0.00001535508,0.09392535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831635,0.000040571373,0.00006838317,0.00032830803,0.000027848027,1.4469222e-7,8.6637314e-8,0.000004445242,0.001213855],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865526,0.00058269803,0.00010634423,0.00012627977,0.000378014,0.00015143289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934036,0.0001508587,0.00023977402,0.00021125388,0.000027805483,0.000029968753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048095905,0.00006929103,0.00010884496,0.000015446023,0.0010092469,0.000020733634,0.0009884343,0.000020362333,0.0016203041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033690318,0.000048557213,0.00011401505,0.00007345486,0.00031475647,0.00029753256,0.00028389867,0.00036222785,0.0000010390305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014723078,0.00083598966,0.0130272135,0.0001387156,0.00008056385,0.0005341991,0.17548083,0.0041836067,0.43167776,0.35590625,0.006225434,0.010437124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006363567,0.0014876385,0.13074614,0.00045554744,0.00046666493,0.0020491646,0.38218635,0.002016298,0.10781261,0.07551973,0.28943926,0.0014569903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036711907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050801854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32386515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018545598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045096804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286681081","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0107","title":"Rethinking the division of tax room and revenue in fiscal federalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tax credit; Government (linguistics); Politics; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Revenue; Law and economics; Double taxation; Direct tax; Ad valorem tax; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012359437236215645,"score_gpt":0.22566495066236988,"score_spread":0.21330551342615423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286681081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663152,0.0010523323,0.00071917794,0.003617111,0.00024776033,0.00011737044,0.000023925491,0.000003995809,0.027903091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879295,0.0005182042,0.0000984646,0.00004528768,0.000017802377,1.9248676e-8,4.7968547e-7,0.0000010335804,0.0005257814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933225,0.00017973875,0.00006697445,0.000044521872,0.000302297,0.00007423627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977404,0.000032740543,0.00011638971,0.00003579004,0.000018537718,0.00002249536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051890634,0.000023066097,0.00006095151,0.0000055427035,0.0009225793,0.00001194505,0.0001394872,0.000019427933,0.00026468074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017372753,0.000021804222,0.00002635282,0.000028821234,0.00008959738,0.00021627448,0.000075966964,0.00008761039,6.667386e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025354672,0.0002041525,0.12242709,0.00002043294,0.00003529966,0.00006726488,0.35616028,0.00087333913,0.00030452435,0.49296734,0.010353472,0.016333267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018440041,0.00027448003,0.21952376,0.00014952784,0.00003714832,0.000011039083,0.12501486,0.00039449104,0.00005597226,0.029234106,0.62326175,0.00019883785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108984284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23631011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6129083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022134802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027305266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89694905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294811563","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0116","title":"What is purposive interpretation?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Presupposition; Doctrine; Epistemology; Nonprobability sampling; Constitutional interpretation; Set (abstract data type); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010967684414629992,"score_gpt":0.24340022694349536,"score_spread":0.23243254252886536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294811563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019125529,0.008668974,0.00048112433,0.0109914895,0.0022632356,0.0002032007,0.00002436324,0.000024303572,0.9582178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964725,0.0018049716,0.000089256246,0.00030551484,0.000077560064,1.220566e-7,5.4936885e-7,9.864605e-7,0.0012485802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940866,0.00009575564,0.000054186217,0.00005550026,0.00029438655,0.000091492046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969715,0.00002688519,0.0000809495,0.000028844262,0.000113674745,0.000052514744],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018972259,0.00003053623,0.000069113055,0.0000086448,0.003175779,0.000030664738,0.00020301026,0.000012799879,0.006175435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061302767,0.00003640421,0.000072846764,0.000025892607,0.00032467875,0.0007196638,0.00009538763,0.00007844338,0.0000054424636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011229713,0.000070700575,0.00061446195,0.0000012459042,0.00012433507,0.000038573504,0.13290721,0.000052719017,0.00001931539,0.84304726,0.008598229,0.014413645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015082517,0.00004654842,0.00038915497,0.000009392739,0.000020004336,0.0000050386416,0.27764437,0.0000061645846,0.00000308016,0.0073980875,0.7142802,0.00004715237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12962215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15633959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97734696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041452632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105270854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4305014601","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0047","title":"Private law legalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Private law; Law; Political science; Rationality; Private rights; Law and economics; Public law; Property rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015386625497086276,"score_gpt":0.24837166932680332,"score_spread":0.23298504382971705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4305014601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019628853,0.00020243273,0.0003271558,0.003284267,0.00018134585,0.00007624927,0.000021760696,0.000022887523,0.97625506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478155,0.00008442185,0.0008672886,0.0001619436,0.0000973989,8.018615e-8,0.0000012456551,0.0000026299751,0.004003423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934846,0.00010874528,0.00006475205,0.000067154935,0.00027949977,0.00013135916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996518,0.000017349494,0.0000972877,0.00008332586,0.000049728886,0.00010050281],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003345976,0.000033808206,0.00006717943,0.0000058260703,0.0035665734,0.000028266824,0.0004011058,0.00001891601,0.00533624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000033352355,0.000041388397,0.00007418513,0.000028275912,0.00020630928,0.00036132737,0.00013386492,0.00013511073,0.0000061686146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095092255,0.000034672772,0.00004709344,7.1556974e-7,0.000011529092,0.0000067857413,0.0063234763,0.000041056595,0.00008054481,0.9914977,0.0015900134,0.00035687903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017804425,0.000023196259,0.00018634932,0.0000016857224,0.000010989702,0.0000048462152,0.012839025,0.000006585564,0.0000080516065,0.00272472,0.98396736,0.00004914683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3035434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25558335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003991231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067525754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306822587","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0056","title":"How important are the groundbreaking cases in administrative law?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Administrative law; Deference; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Standard of review; Concurring opinion; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Precedent; Majority opinion; Certiorari; Judicial opinion; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; History","score_opus":0.042128945546095524,"score_gpt":0.2677486533160273,"score_spread":0.2256197077699318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306822587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32167798,0.0058789817,0.000043211967,0.017978441,0.00071978,0.00023768916,0.00007804304,0.000022658982,0.6533632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999323,0.0002236231,0.00001992892,0.0001020332,0.00008979082,1.3710675e-7,4.1714173e-7,0.0000010397124,0.00024002777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992444,0.00017483579,0.00006975028,0.00006575893,0.00031376522,0.00013148489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996077,0.00008661051,0.00016238034,0.00003666392,0.00006465102,0.00004200808],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037494066,0.00004343111,0.000095202755,0.0000071334407,0.004173017,0.000037620743,0.00023118859,0.000015287662,0.00035900116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002609848,0.00003860086,0.00006535937,0.000040487885,0.0006408764,0.000300454,0.00008950297,0.0001379736,2.434235e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000459034,0.00004213773,0.0060993778,6.599533e-7,0.000029938274,0.0003597249,0.014003746,0.000004446092,0.000003863639,0.97891754,0.00028326694,0.00020936974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019449087,0.00006867329,0.0047327206,0.000012476383,0.000018162198,0.000048254267,0.64130455,0.000001875972,0.0000017520769,0.0057447455,0.34780687,0.00006541205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50869757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92923737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97317284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004977501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014603212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384567723","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0091","title":"How victims matter: Rethinking the significance of the victim in criminal theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Retributive justice; Criminology; Criminal law; Psychology; Law and economics; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.0217242042204304,"score_gpt":0.20741697179260538,"score_spread":0.18569276757217498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384567723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92139983,0.00018386595,0.00028669497,0.006606743,0.00076920615,0.00022716113,0.000018458664,0.000028980197,0.07047908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979139,0.00012124789,0.000052456784,0.00017623862,0.000038909282,6.903054e-8,9.693621e-8,0.0000048817697,0.0016921954],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989702,0.00032288852,0.00010672071,0.00012554636,0.00029802782,0.00017660599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932265,0.00020352499,0.00019129497,0.00021059076,0.00003728021,0.00003467844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045195007,0.000073320836,0.00011315794,0.00002051918,0.0004920394,0.00002671358,0.0007981084,0.000038327762,0.00040036076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006290595,0.00004781443,0.00011154989,0.000116207426,0.00037428946,0.00035951953,0.00015249438,0.00023802121,0.000007180136],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079870416,0.00035425913,0.015227697,0.00022682035,0.00007858523,0.00059437327,0.13862215,0.0015170844,0.556944,0.26254186,0.009766951,0.0133274635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051171035,0.000726149,0.39743745,0.0013281346,0.0003932354,0.0007121936,0.1981537,0.002845841,0.19290937,0.09095501,0.10808835,0.0013334574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027388532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007694934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38220975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008877226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033963057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43836695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385577120","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0064","title":"Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Disadvantaged; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Harm; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Law; Algorithm; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.053902923674394095,"score_gpt":0.26727063266057827,"score_spread":0.21336770898618418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385577120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16791125,0.001828265,0.0052070953,0.0043818927,0.0012684627,0.0001601573,0.0000088353345,0.00029990997,0.81893414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630034,0.0005386334,0.00041309727,0.00022150135,0.0005993083,3.4565215e-8,0.000008765908,0.0000075273047,0.001910807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993618,0.000017365252,0.00010832523,0.00011705065,0.0002422205,0.00015323993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955815,0.00004211101,0.00018260627,0.00006607648,0.00013254638,0.000018534201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031085167,0.00007847585,0.0001520294,0.000029758374,0.0008223306,0.00013693343,0.00018948986,0.000032895576,0.0005533677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022591275,0.0000851721,0.00005520719,0.000060238075,0.000098260265,0.00086779136,0.0007233232,0.000095792515,0.00006289768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000489891,0.00023817398,0.06355988,0.00076295825,0.00092989893,0.00031009482,0.0068496955,0.0040430035,0.0017811083,0.59589183,0.09723772,0.22790575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019088289,0.000033042943,0.16907302,0.00016452455,0.00035444702,0.000006562356,0.030728392,0.01724674,0.000009497432,0.017513255,0.76257527,0.00038640838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025740074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148014305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8283891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004898749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000073183664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385829522","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0112","title":"Public nuisance for private persons","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Private law; Liability; Law and economics; Private sphere; Private rights; Political science; Business; Law; Public law; Public sphere; Economics","score_opus":0.0642349668068549,"score_gpt":0.2884805393198329,"score_spread":0.224245572512978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385829522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078877375,0.0002958789,0.0078000408,0.031394985,0.000453165,0.00045364656,0.00011104801,0.00017968421,0.88043416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906586,0.0003010627,0.0019357105,0.000041332914,0.00016994243,1.8682908e-7,0.000002424574,0.0000035002554,0.0068872413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995365,0.000029613118,0.00005186608,0.00006656475,0.00014064387,0.00017480353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996006,0.000045978995,0.00007332997,0.00006589336,0.000099330355,0.000114880844],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031789267,0.00003153703,0.00006279203,0.0000109623015,0.0015358821,0.000038147737,0.00028773045,0.000033862478,0.00047434552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029124441,0.000035708075,0.00008365271,0.000052770338,0.00016407196,0.00039488904,0.00003596713,0.00004945828,0.000015804715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007066422,0.000018525194,0.00027729006,0.0000032009157,0.00001649123,0.0000017989662,0.0063443165,0.0000059522717,0.00009323451,0.9795719,0.011556694,0.002103526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019800117,0.00001543096,0.001141841,0.0000051035418,0.000008477259,6.63986e-7,0.011110042,0.00005974116,0.000006693392,0.002025011,0.9853844,0.00004459615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01895976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123163745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017085145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008098585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830333","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0003","title":"Explainability and the Epistemic Division of Labour in Adjudication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Transparency (behavior); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Division of labour; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010235642338196089,"score_gpt":0.2192349413401937,"score_spread":0.2089992990019976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505436,0.00050551567,0.04086953,0.0034739054,0.00014387559,0.00016962418,0.0000025094723,0.000028615117,0.004262822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835277,0.00038515247,0.0011176943,0.000014501584,0.000007708359,7.5413375e-8,2.1787845e-7,0.0000014835629,0.00012042723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992162,0.000187398,0.00016647774,0.00011654171,0.00018886793,0.00012449309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924093,0.00019436484,0.00016566322,0.00021862159,0.00013612337,0.000044321336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012350848,0.000047904072,0.00013211457,0.00003519282,0.0002156952,0.000019921838,0.00055052317,0.00003255556,0.000037421443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007764046,0.00004112949,0.000045622895,0.00013506238,0.0002495813,0.0007153566,0.00022545528,0.00008909251,0.000003811437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009686512,0.00005491916,0.0052319984,0.000037607337,0.0000140155025,0.000024211677,0.0149010485,0.00047890982,0.0008152099,0.9557381,0.000120424935,0.022486692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004521091,0.00055870373,0.4533634,0.00045328235,0.00003471177,0.00008469679,0.059330206,0.10732238,0.008276329,0.3525944,0.012916723,0.0005440852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026812155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021175977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6031437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012851006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035364887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830349","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0006","title":"Problems with Probability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Settlement (finance); Probabilistic logic; Liability; Triage; Resolution (logic); Balance (ability); Legal liability; Computer science; Actuarial science; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Economics; Psychology; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.042545828120874464,"score_gpt":0.2729816347433351,"score_spread":0.23043580662246063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19973703,0.00010335619,0.0023103426,0.0022056568,0.00037197644,0.00035698703,0.00000663612,0.00018380953,0.7947242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552214,0.0001730264,0.0017740207,0.00001695162,0.000100236735,6.768039e-8,6.1327273e-7,0.000004440221,0.0024084963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990987,0.00012513425,0.00009326284,0.000103068465,0.00035203915,0.00022776957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993737,0.00005969972,0.00010411064,0.00010024117,0.0002279296,0.00013432252],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007411286,0.00005165258,0.00010100996,0.000013392727,0.0011485444,0.000030226363,0.0003230012,0.000053007643,0.0018071334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003587578,0.0000501488,0.00005636907,0.00009372401,0.0007956662,0.0005933111,0.000039508348,0.00009780986,0.000052396557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018256545,0.00017456725,0.008751111,0.000029489902,0.000088100875,0.000105665706,0.12695777,0.0013771004,0.00021346,0.837071,0.0049554026,0.020093752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019862075,0.00021990668,0.0014694927,0.000073047915,0.00003178637,0.00000763064,0.076211974,0.00007632547,0.00011627706,0.017317835,0.9040881,0.00018903559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1609887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6995662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89913267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030231252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013314896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830373","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0005","title":"Courts as Data Guardians for the Public Good","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Public records; Government (linguistics); Workflow; Business; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.11631886042939898,"score_gpt":0.3531896412349339,"score_spread":0.23687078080553492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014948491,0.0014263524,0.018662108,0.086408146,0.005091841,0.0010640881,0.00033838322,0.00028077423,0.8717798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913456,0.0014026512,0.0005823249,0.00014674224,0.0005801949,1.339966e-7,0.000009656827,0.000008160402,0.00592456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899906,0.00011249794,0.00010609808,0.00012701424,0.00036640803,0.00028894437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987921,0.0004235814,0.000120848774,0.00030359876,0.00022616755,0.00013366652],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015672158,0.000054583088,0.00009914558,0.000015119408,0.002754245,0.00010175431,0.0014830884,0.000064199405,0.0018539662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025489304,0.00004971347,0.000091639704,0.00006500418,0.0006051783,0.0010478466,0.00018824526,0.00009765328,0.00008880471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032846816,0.000035394387,0.00017687106,0.0000031622847,0.00009481559,0.000025272222,0.015103629,0.000035518395,0.000020233343,0.8752672,0.08207118,0.027133865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069591995,0.000031837437,0.00009380535,0.0000071104805,0.000032884724,0.0000035931032,0.06840685,0.00031968782,0.000010142196,0.0040046824,0.9269607,0.000059130816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11002221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58514714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019615622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023790188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830377","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0004","title":"Contractual Howlers: A Russian Bond Case Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bond; Order (exchange); Meaning (existential); Literal and figurative language; Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.029088612063656025,"score_gpt":0.2105053900414622,"score_spread":0.1814167779778062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.768253,0.00071268616,0.00018750817,0.00020173352,0.00096449594,0.00022641603,0.000108641914,0.000044855362,0.22930062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986366,0.00023461666,0.00007883011,0.000033586355,0.00025457697,1.5570242e-7,0.000002526702,0.000013356962,0.0007457267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899083,0.00002834668,0.00042347942,0.00023200714,0.000043287688,0.00028205823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999027,0.00004373248,0.0004960145,0.00021079407,0.00003441924,0.00018805185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007473833,0.00010371909,0.0004593481,0.0000761309,0.0005411438,0.00007140907,0.00027203374,0.00008749331,0.0011227238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017570997,0.00015629832,0.00018450776,0.000054074164,0.00013783731,0.00066485343,0.0000740748,0.00013523773,0.00027258508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023088159,0.0008453891,0.087739706,0.00004323473,0.001135039,0.011209446,0.04800199,0.00013244424,0.000010121891,0.8323315,0.016011251,0.0023090076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015272679,0.002129298,0.052970737,0.00010404856,0.0001827284,0.0041576414,0.39997032,0.0019480994,0.000014353664,0.03533442,0.48621696,0.001698688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17971702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17162797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7969971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035876472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027115326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830382","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0007","title":"Access to Justice and Civil-Procedural Bargaining","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Procedural justice; Political science; Psychological intervention; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Law and economics; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03697158666923104,"score_gpt":0.2247608322656042,"score_spread":0.18778924559637317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26528984,0.0011337458,0.0015700285,0.0012362105,0.001265278,0.0001782906,0.00009878721,0.00005784688,0.72916996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980543,0.00067288574,0.00021131846,0.00025985853,0.00023597367,9.4580614e-8,0.0000020366172,0.000009936774,0.0005535647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928063,0.000011561677,0.0002619898,0.00018940847,0.000030287178,0.00022614418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993715,0.00003322658,0.00025557357,0.00010929073,0.000040403305,0.00018996048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004406298,0.00007283075,0.00029312618,0.00006768062,0.00041562566,0.00009918212,0.00031724534,0.00006110122,0.0006070788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003744827,0.00011410686,0.000073536605,0.0000568514,0.00008100379,0.0008284799,0.0001602631,0.00007854886,0.00013150128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010861683,0.000037783655,0.030176807,0.00009822133,0.00017705112,0.000050986222,0.0072833723,0.0004146463,0.000033247266,0.93155795,0.028645469,0.0014158264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004757649,0.0006117144,0.2063267,0.0002906211,0.00017951189,0.00015722329,0.027569517,0.004884663,0.000057807647,0.124807045,0.6288648,0.0014927234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020482248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03281736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80675095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019496873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016950144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830403","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0002","title":"An Evidence-Based Approach to Private Ordering","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Incentive; Bargaining power; Law and economics; Arbitration; Private information retrieval; Ex-ante; Business; Imperfect; Economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04934786125561251,"score_gpt":0.21232620027880708,"score_spread":0.16297833902319458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6272004,0.0015346984,0.054178163,0.0007199696,0.001543394,0.0004551898,0.000106044834,0.00015815768,0.31410396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967699,0.00029152044,0.002397909,0.00010302997,0.00020068919,2.0366656e-7,0.0000039612123,0.000013334194,0.00021942372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911886,0.000025992647,0.00031316548,0.00024263785,0.00004368027,0.00025566123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916506,0.000027590153,0.00030087863,0.00024264977,0.000043724198,0.00022012256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076731463,0.00008473796,0.00033010085,0.00008301171,0.00034863618,0.00006758802,0.00046426879,0.00007283528,0.0003841783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002712163,0.00013195821,0.00012731172,0.00007881289,0.000077123215,0.0009213506,0.000056634915,0.000084748535,0.0001934752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016661435,0.00017668484,0.028135326,0.000073395,0.00013483109,0.000022545762,0.0033140436,0.014218216,0.00017334908,0.9499318,0.002291969,0.0013612151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005280908,0.0015147323,0.10122901,0.00059098937,0.00007267508,0.000047913098,0.00933562,0.063441105,0.00030066585,0.04072281,0.77534646,0.0021171106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024953038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053490517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.909209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037548202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025559768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830409","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0014","title":"The Counterintuitive Consequences of Sex Offender Risk Assessments at Sentencing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Counterintuitive; Psychology; Risk assessment; Sentence; Criminology; Sentencing guidelines; Social psychology; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.025593429787216453,"score_gpt":0.30059076041138255,"score_spread":0.2749973306241661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603674,0.00016445413,0.00049079803,0.0001693104,0.00029822867,0.00004185936,0.000015194041,0.000013499609,0.038439274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933849,0.004870213,0.0000661249,0.00000767506,0.000043067186,3.5243296e-8,6.6061654e-7,0.0000017329546,0.0016256126],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991475,0.00020466463,0.0001053999,0.00007127545,0.00032644806,0.00014475397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991905,0.000212717,0.00023463846,0.00007047363,0.00023147067,0.000060197242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067525543,0.000043597476,0.00010536126,0.00001957624,0.0022935502,0.000026395679,0.00022207375,0.000029973828,0.00052551035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003737997,0.000037772534,0.00011900462,0.00007901191,0.0005882676,0.0002237194,0.00006161157,0.000077199846,0.000006730559],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089225726,0.0003091406,0.07502329,0.00007680288,0.003080032,0.00034262726,0.54409796,0.0014502608,0.0067986753,0.03483893,0.013117734,0.31997228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012172165,0.000047762675,0.0016995682,0.000020800908,0.00018100147,0.00000514686,0.9763768,0.00012990739,0.00010051388,0.00015060123,0.02112129,0.00004490247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5225635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8131455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4322788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038191126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104220286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830852","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0071","title":"The Reconciliation Project of Labour Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Indigenous; Sociology; Democracy; Law; Capitalism; Narrative; Equity (law); Normative; Law reform; Political science; Private law; Law and economics; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.02412989270591382,"score_gpt":0.2854735803885939,"score_spread":0.26134368768268007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106569335,0.00010460867,0.000030686486,0.0019263264,0.0005833499,0.00009924346,0.0000299237,0.000026618307,0.8906299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97947437,0.00079233106,0.000109779365,0.000041399107,0.00011906285,3.9926338e-8,0.0000016456722,0.0000022969336,0.019459074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934256,0.000104675564,0.00008621607,0.0000440156,0.00031006587,0.00011247406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943435,0.000078035904,0.0001265845,0.00004902555,0.0002812988,0.00003071213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006900538,0.000029751282,0.000059601734,0.00001002292,0.0010021371,0.000021747106,0.0002497088,0.000031733878,0.00037126732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031718257,0.000025896241,0.00006172068,0.00004829469,0.00023140949,0.00033173815,0.000025363393,0.00004977003,0.000007764663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003267715,0.000009798928,0.00028475316,0.0000023804148,0.00002652606,0.0000027495355,0.004911727,0.000007570049,0.000060010385,0.9913964,0.0025818096,0.0006835906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001898849,0.000037122503,0.0019129063,0.000013597652,0.00000798332,7.162901e-7,0.011537315,0.000013909778,0.0000752776,0.0027813322,0.9833957,0.00003425577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3258928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64093214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000190249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009582625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77077293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386744342","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0027","title":"A milestone in Canadian legal history","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Lakehead University; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Milestone; Indigenous; Law; Legal history; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010587496698634196,"score_gpt":0.19624311569554193,"score_spread":0.18565561899690772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386744342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043350875,0.0014436111,0.0000017515425,0.0015676437,0.00084635353,0.000050002935,0.000012798471,0.000020562105,0.9527064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90254396,0.0018335949,0.000084492945,0.0001504643,0.00019227776,4.1702528e-8,0.0000027141261,0.000006524573,0.0951859],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935085,0.00007312644,0.00006464632,0.00006633724,0.00017463007,0.00027038547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943185,0.0000138719415,0.00004581025,0.000056937217,0.00004997197,0.000401559],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040642114,0.000032182772,0.00008458481,0.00022155077,0.000862969,0.000030442201,0.00022720169,0.000060764098,0.0061374735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022230148,0.000054447024,0.000060182363,0.00006545291,0.00044847265,0.00045414898,0.000012201306,0.000110021894,0.00006828043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029496143,0.00003201816,0.0016177961,0.0000098522305,0.000027548736,0.0017633813,0.08978916,0.000031103787,0.000035343553,0.3346316,0.5666833,0.0053494344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016559205,0.000009643465,0.0069920965,0.000011516678,0.0000055213577,0.000003790038,0.010617986,0.0000052583387,8.684189e-8,0.00006390511,0.9820684,0.000056196914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8591931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01511612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029333727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99477106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387130733","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0017","title":"Reconstructing <i>Gladue</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Complicity; Blame; Prison; Criminology; Accountability; Political science; Supreme court; Impunity; Law; Jury; Sociology; Restorative justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Human rights","score_opus":0.018609392712293383,"score_gpt":0.2589954752653462,"score_spread":0.24038608255305283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387130733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6226964,0.00017034328,0.00043061312,0.000417187,0.00063796184,0.00003003375,0.0000030882074,0.00006473911,0.37554964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959359,0.0015044446,0.0005489963,0.000020635169,0.00019093846,1.0869967e-8,6.8262824e-7,0.0000024126564,0.0017959797],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948317,0.00007057501,0.00006871859,0.00006158722,0.00017504198,0.00014092491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995941,0.000054773223,0.000086759166,0.000054027205,0.00012369908,0.00008662997],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036080935,0.00003264875,0.00008115198,0.00002620147,0.0014481461,0.000027555796,0.00016320466,0.000034201083,0.0019207868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003131106,0.000039064562,0.000106384294,0.000104789964,0.0001560721,0.0003520789,0.000026570866,0.00007096221,0.000033965785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011402295,0.00009930929,0.011867629,0.000030330331,0.00033828735,0.00028249074,0.20191443,0.00028666854,0.0005648823,0.09258632,0.01866658,0.67324907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010230335,0.00001651841,0.00017623724,0.000015424182,0.00009681941,0.000011012839,0.841784,0.00008782875,0.000009996501,0.00016049139,0.15748787,0.000051526848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41143793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.732951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6731975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001563595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061435574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667228","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0060","title":"The Autonomy of Administration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Autonomy; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Doctrine; Presumption; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.018280407148459875,"score_gpt":0.27629386433761677,"score_spread":0.2580134571891569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07262072,0.00012571336,0.00040631613,0.0067770337,0.00015091039,0.000097546275,0.000009389652,0.000026394622,0.919786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960412,0.00028265166,0.0001736405,0.000005058901,0.000048010304,2.3184711e-8,5.259875e-7,8.1201546e-7,0.0034481282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996922,0.000036298687,0.0000560246,0.000028024131,0.00011929663,0.00006812666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996951,0.000051072715,0.000088556015,0.000050838342,0.00007396058,0.00004045486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031680803,0.000016568176,0.000035169764,0.0000037285035,0.0010638111,0.000015590102,0.00018886717,0.000018683262,0.00018442958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000109674165,0.000014647939,0.000041545154,0.000030455969,0.00019002265,0.00015977863,0.000020492793,0.00003440225,0.000006730119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094719335,0.000011703407,0.00018956247,0.0000011561167,0.000011464854,0.0000013284765,0.00574429,0.000009482694,0.0000735085,0.9879835,0.0015768973,0.0043876045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077077646,0.000019125335,0.003742889,0.000003691092,0.0000069114503,5.119674e-7,0.01904797,0.00003027598,0.000039592807,0.0012993296,0.97571295,0.000019687719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030844536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21444836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096752854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018160006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667245","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0063","title":"The Independence of the Judiciary and Some of Its Enemies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Democracy; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Supreme court; Miller; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015509600138397353,"score_gpt":0.23616337561439815,"score_spread":0.2206537754760008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7319861,0.013477019,0.000010176635,0.005656115,0.0005991368,0.00013296473,0.000022417647,0.0000133633475,0.24810268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98940504,0.010310337,0.000007461261,0.000012644832,0.000047261445,1.5149187e-8,3.941178e-8,5.741551e-7,0.00021665814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943984,0.00007036965,0.00007014789,0.000035668985,0.00030010354,0.000083869774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955606,0.0001178043,0.000121533376,0.000036494494,0.0001421601,0.000025969386],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004089985,0.000027005744,0.00007657612,0.00000605859,0.0015083897,0.000005537572,0.00023365462,0.00002725577,0.00003573176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006351654,0.000018324901,0.000049918155,0.000044357166,0.001184835,0.00018635613,0.00011507737,0.000057525398,7.4937816e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023407933,0.000010417631,0.004999291,0.0000035276937,0.00005470504,0.0000026092332,0.007273257,0.000008629815,0.0002484424,0.9850656,0.00066356815,0.0016465742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073787867,0.00011915899,0.43773448,0.00031038673,0.00014505396,0.000008691704,0.23467682,0.00001785402,0.0007601578,0.17082155,0.15447941,0.00018855995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10147668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20627105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81424403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043680782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010728677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667261","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0066","title":"Reflections on ‘Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Supreme court; Social equality; Economic Justice; Social justice; Law; Algorithm; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14908466407441157,"score_gpt":0.4130959155791495,"score_spread":0.2640112515047379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019668916,0.000056446548,0.0007542553,0.0031795593,0.00047648296,0.000054372143,0.000015267859,0.000095338495,0.97569937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114084,0.0011608346,0.0005361438,0.00017237841,0.00023203733,4.1320014e-8,0.0000069435396,0.000005516708,0.0067452635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869615,0.00038725405,0.000114763505,0.00013001672,0.00046520258,0.0002066439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993042,0.00019356448,0.00012613219,0.000069901645,0.00012311077,0.00018314351],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011187126,0.000064312066,0.0001271471,0.000030321977,0.002227054,0.00010732993,0.000235215,0.000077077195,0.0010104444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103085156,0.000076190314,0.00006492598,0.00007380347,0.0002884405,0.00045204847,0.00019547467,0.00017437135,0.000044656783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047290712,0.00006779138,0.00014598729,0.000012890099,0.00005404334,0.0000215994,0.063110076,0.00012457186,0.00010337721,0.91983384,0.00312738,0.0133511545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093891466,0.00020122192,0.006604612,0.00008399123,0.00018203775,0.000002707207,0.21569316,0.00023350306,0.000025306512,0.0322509,0.743529,0.00025459056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19622941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35358185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9714719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027005462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061281215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667268","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0062","title":"The Joy of Justice: <i>Les Misérables</i> and Rosalie Abella","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Universalism; Doctrine; Pragmatism; Law; Economic Justice; Autocracy; Law and economics; Realism; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.01700146489031163,"score_gpt":0.251302037658309,"score_spread":0.23430057276799737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10092725,0.0023227818,0.00002343517,0.008445925,0.0005799577,0.00010331561,0.00001968445,0.000036204063,0.8875415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906773,0.005462955,0.00007728157,0.00003536012,0.0002247689,1.4641007e-8,4.1919307e-7,0.0000029205837,0.003518991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993208,0.00012298406,0.00008406723,0.00005704511,0.0002651393,0.00014993643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945927,0.0001482215,0.000116643285,0.00005343381,0.0001272184,0.000095188865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005480262,0.000042510004,0.00010096804,0.000008185258,0.0024991722,0.000030288078,0.00024156008,0.000057764486,0.00009865439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041652933,0.000036419402,0.00006766502,0.000049717557,0.00067970157,0.00022661038,0.000053761785,0.00008935269,0.0000032079934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000684284,0.000031613614,0.0006233374,0.00002535425,0.0000722206,0.000022356277,0.03707464,0.000010628846,0.00024687775,0.94225067,0.0138487,0.00572515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051145215,0.000066161396,0.0019818998,0.000035443845,0.00010745846,0.0000021118044,0.09436616,0.000014301888,0.000036126727,0.021483196,0.88129306,0.00010264984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07468755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14104407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007130746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072582574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667270","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0089","title":"Editor’s Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.014960917419215814,"score_gpt":0.26065816797123514,"score_spread":0.24569725055201933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05354608,0.00022265474,0.00041179347,0.02762894,0.017979166,0.00011930518,0.0000107635515,0.0001745673,0.89990675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779727,0.0008782507,0.00017899254,0.000029816805,0.012494761,1.1049295e-8,0.0000016948729,0.0000037811387,0.008439985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994562,0.000076276854,0.000043429776,0.00005793575,0.00024276337,0.00012335164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967074,0.00002855372,0.00006789876,0.00005089224,0.000110021974,0.00007190077],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005862025,0.000028578686,0.00005743219,0.000013624574,0.0011786345,0.000025698984,0.00016687131,0.000051443993,0.0013706279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028864331,0.000032944852,0.00005001474,0.00003256618,0.00021365454,0.00043559057,0.000026860203,0.00011055905,0.000032891643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028190985,0.000036673144,0.000101028294,0.0000041422613,0.00003548582,0.000023305069,0.029093793,0.0000132397945,0.00047765454,0.64804053,0.31753212,0.004613851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108833585,0.00002209899,0.00067003496,0.00000481682,0.0000072548423,0.0000014232002,0.01720888,0.0000064561073,0.000017324086,0.0028891473,0.97902507,0.00003866931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060014594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14048326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019664198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006647699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667275","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0069","title":"The Administration of Justice: Justice Rosalie Abella’s Contribution to Canadian Administrative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Economic Justice; Legislation; Sociology; Principle of legality; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.029819710840239086,"score_gpt":0.3002272643422826,"score_spread":0.2704075535020435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032735985,0.00078226865,0.00032460698,0.024928443,0.0015460019,0.0003823933,0.00024001783,0.000039964907,0.93902034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986637,0.00057119824,0.000054925673,0.00011518042,0.00017397037,1.3370685e-7,0.0000042135775,0.0000015281934,0.00041512804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991338,0.000108685395,0.00013038702,0.00007821566,0.0003166509,0.0002322417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988798,0.00016262525,0.00012614022,0.00005353636,0.0005467714,0.00023114456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055410416,0.000056789755,0.00011163187,0.000015322406,0.004292534,0.00003424039,0.00022455724,0.000053925873,0.00012150159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017279519,0.00005357091,0.000061819606,0.00009325023,0.00069494115,0.00021723789,0.000026885156,0.0000752753,0.000017639226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001192617,0.000012602552,0.00004172503,0.00000315803,0.000043465643,0.000024073499,0.0034683303,0.000017810708,0.000037649443,0.9921012,0.0038298848,0.00030082528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003278928,0.00022516052,0.0048949295,0.000044993547,0.00026799986,0.00000558358,0.09785809,0.000010687341,0.0000980589,0.0065597454,0.8895839,0.00012294203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7853863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98554146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054333365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092913443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99700373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667287","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0073","title":"Substantive Equality and Its Remedial Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Focus (optics); Social equality; Economic Justice; Gender equity; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Inequality; Law; Social science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03552002745116641,"score_gpt":0.28295883661936505,"score_spread":0.24743880916819863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55954915,0.0021727465,0.00002692493,0.0053091696,0.00078464195,0.00015424824,0.00003411297,0.00009985903,0.43186912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98983514,0.0067529576,0.00011078815,0.00004585204,0.00014998397,1.7854676e-8,0.0000011884309,0.0000017147701,0.003102351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992001,0.00018758616,0.000070273156,0.00008438647,0.0002882554,0.00016941669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948335,0.00009120319,0.00009586614,0.00003645266,0.00016453161,0.00012857417],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007140471,0.00004651055,0.00010430252,0.0000025055106,0.0014148604,0.0000281397,0.00018505492,0.00009061486,0.00078168476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006057016,0.000046825826,0.0000681266,0.000056720855,0.0007722659,0.0004902065,0.000037387614,0.000104992636,0.000009745891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005180662,0.000020951147,0.00091298326,0.000008905689,0.00006786263,0.00005663577,0.15614301,0.0000027177718,0.00080223003,0.83488494,0.006288063,0.0007598893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006957326,0.00006948117,0.0029883161,0.000050166298,0.0000516702,0.000007614052,0.4417368,0.00001369931,0.0002063541,0.0085802125,0.5454166,0.00018339032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022137733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28607643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82630473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012785474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009477898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387901656","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0082","title":"Ableism’s new clothes: Achievements and challenges for disability rights in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Ableism; Medical model of disability; Normative; Disability studies; Scholarship; Inclusion (mineral); Ideology; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Normalization (sociology); Political science; Politics; Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Convention; Gender studies; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.039474078018174506,"score_gpt":0.2662170139979951,"score_spread":0.22674293597982056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387901656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90669274,0.000649514,0.00004538077,0.016856126,0.00048804295,0.0004370351,0.00002422185,0.000022521881,0.074784406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973474,0.0013414212,0.00018124981,0.000010151721,0.000070951704,7.7529805e-8,0.0000014625872,0.0000016864594,0.0010455669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993693,0.00008475702,0.000089549365,0.00010449054,0.00019583035,0.0001560512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996082,0.00010941754,0.00005875904,0.00006042858,0.00003715477,0.00012601684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003641133,0.000043102496,0.000104072795,0.0000072720054,0.00049066864,0.000014542338,0.00013659055,0.000031256768,0.00020689551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015195731,0.000038712114,0.000033245244,0.000024288105,0.00023646983,0.00034551191,0.000023190085,0.000038688584,5.307563e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036266237,0.00029464284,0.0770678,0.0001491626,0.00014687647,0.000029215968,0.09556454,0.00015344194,0.00002092601,0.7530246,0.006969399,0.066216774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012234448,0.000063406726,0.1826126,0.000041361192,0.00002228695,7.9276913e-7,0.09393617,0.00007701761,0.00000833528,0.034001883,0.6878778,0.00013495373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99849105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7190227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007227234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002867508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37738758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911209","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0043","title":"A person suffering: On danger and care in mental health law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive detention; Mental health law; Law; Mental health; Jurisdiction; Involuntary treatment; Harm; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03443700117604496,"score_gpt":0.32411988488266374,"score_spread":0.28968288370661877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255084,0.001216485,0.0000050681447,0.0022855958,0.00056153623,0.00011245567,0.000030388741,0.000026412963,0.070253685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893486,0.0002728068,0.00009925247,0.00016138439,0.000050846003,4.6203066e-8,0.000004980077,0.0000068348054,0.00046900587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991772,0.00015766908,0.00010402542,0.00015143496,0.00016779653,0.00024184803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995674,0.000047885187,0.00007803755,0.000106845626,0.000030924548,0.00016891256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027655085,0.00007399775,0.00016436228,0.000048188223,0.00034767474,0.000010980066,0.00011983296,0.00007734941,0.0004334232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000051216166,0.00007544739,0.00005113625,0.000036864774,0.00008504063,0.00007959112,0.00002908787,0.00020769492,0.000022681406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015423105,0.00033613134,0.003510524,0.00014208666,0.00017943978,0.005847809,0.6157537,0.000029110499,0.00008699401,0.050904684,0.014254538,0.30741265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033143112,0.0015514478,0.09705105,0.0005413079,0.000009649785,0.00054734334,0.5774408,0.00003550888,0.0000043653613,0.00013085676,0.31913108,0.00024229125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07395102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13060552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30717036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003866638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040567913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93221563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911532","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0056","title":"Against moralism in anti-discrimination law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Private law; Politics; Instrumentalism; Statutory law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05002326567264085,"score_gpt":0.3009886832183637,"score_spread":0.2509654175457228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10714471,0.000059072485,0.000020622772,0.0067786574,0.00024306176,0.000041199342,0.000007631763,0.00002951229,0.88567555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987557,0.00038642192,0.00008847205,0.0002050303,0.000120780496,1.1105421e-8,0.0000021823014,0.0000021757057,0.00043922538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992488,0.00014633336,0.00007991197,0.00006519101,0.0002584982,0.00020124344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963707,0.00006445488,0.000050158273,0.000050745028,0.00007996287,0.00011761822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059778645,0.00003927555,0.00009059602,0.000022574588,0.0006466876,0.000020485524,0.00020060276,0.00008761052,0.00017607467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042608466,0.00004619754,0.000057248762,0.000057275152,0.00043869927,0.00059389276,0.000035696707,0.00015369298,0.000017893277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066201774,0.000022021728,0.000116407704,0.000004749274,0.000005237395,0.00004783175,0.013831562,0.00002459336,0.00003746198,0.98516995,0.00039859416,0.0003349847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016111246,0.00009706429,0.021172011,0.00021396141,0.000046191148,0.000004391966,0.10718876,0.0002895444,0.00009905137,0.47320145,0.39569208,0.00038438072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17688018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38452506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026783344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058560872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82860106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911625","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0023","title":"Interpreting Dicey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; History; Democracy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017460022971329724,"score_gpt":0.256647569993155,"score_spread":0.2391875470218253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029220518,0.00033626155,0.00015762009,0.0016062807,0.00033696272,0.000024766949,0.000002974354,0.000037222362,0.9682774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823433,0.0007519792,0.00010120734,0.000036880494,0.0001264973,8.6256495e-9,2.9432653e-7,9.0938823e-7,0.00074789836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956065,0.000048963415,0.000047643825,0.000043194552,0.00018197452,0.00011759299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973977,0.000044648797,0.000049981132,0.000022819038,0.000083524305,0.000059270078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029017194,0.000026651249,0.00006316482,0.000009313368,0.0014931007,0.0000125496435,0.00014847721,0.000023206747,0.0007247111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004013951,0.000028937508,0.000056946552,0.000037928734,0.00037889637,0.00022986041,0.000053769305,0.00004979122,0.000033539647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002866316,0.000016083883,0.0030894803,0.000001693634,0.000055270924,0.00004752566,0.023499224,0.000011584768,0.000048946444,0.9579647,0.00833873,0.0068980795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019894181,0.000028630924,0.0061713066,0.000055060264,0.00002025443,0.0000028060967,0.10714089,0.000012584315,0.000005124895,0.009569801,0.876716,0.00007859089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24222942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36084428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014461865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005839762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388143396","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0057","title":"Lessons from the American Innocence Projects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Redress; Criminal justice; Injustice; Law; Legalism (Western philosophy); Culpability; Context (archaeology); Political science; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Narrative; Imprisonment; History; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.035658266066478685,"score_gpt":0.3040701322674209,"score_spread":0.2684118662009422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388143396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96153724,0.00015778215,0.0004186686,0.004268231,0.00022611553,0.000042763804,0.000011544918,0.000038003614,0.03329967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713886,0.0019192352,0.00017234913,0.00007340369,0.00015707263,2.8980944e-8,0.0000011443316,0.000001809561,0.0005361032],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938273,0.0001289928,0.000053852484,0.00007289018,0.00022741575,0.00013409599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947584,0.00013777017,0.00012245066,0.00008541329,0.00011881207,0.000059730217],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027690447,0.00003586132,0.000086915024,0.000015103121,0.0015723234,0.00003781112,0.00032041522,0.000016095859,0.00044458156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043121796,0.000031217733,0.00008603996,0.00020707828,0.00038714678,0.00022648391,0.00004355976,0.00008805685,0.000022358452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017444926,0.0001360105,0.012846054,0.000005763152,0.00036692337,0.00016629955,0.39013,0.0001732935,0.00040251092,0.049051967,0.036879793,0.5096669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061100865,0.000024441018,0.009763938,0.000011879868,0.00011775827,0.0000012373289,0.8918227,0.000059675087,0.0000048263214,0.00011312316,0.09797453,0.00004478451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86301285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9301262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50962216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014740608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001025452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390939528","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0020","title":"Subsidiary and the structure of property law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Public property; Law and economics; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Law; Private law; Private property; Political science; Common law; Property rights; Public law; Business; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.009040956041293341,"score_gpt":0.23063285207405976,"score_spread":0.2215918960327664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390939528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09299343,0.005175268,0.00022941556,0.010490021,0.00023473012,0.00023619008,0.000049473234,0.000026315309,0.89056516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980663,0.00042792104,0.00023369827,0.000030603056,0.000069321424,7.259652e-9,2.6064984e-7,0.0000013916422,0.0011705116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996585,0.00006379598,0.000050297727,0.000046294135,0.00012056618,0.00006052853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997782,0.00004304687,0.000036984417,0.00004904759,0.000049804446,0.000042923013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001904984,0.000026734662,0.000063467254,0.000003409915,0.00056215416,0.0000326282,0.00015650096,0.000028385102,0.0004357022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004637372,0.00001559869,0.000044657234,0.000018669409,0.00067689316,0.00025325766,0.00003554816,0.00008023958,6.8692015e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016240854,0.000004789567,0.000029253226,0.0000070704045,0.000020937734,0.0000021420497,0.010108771,0.0000022178417,0.00020646983,0.98749983,0.00044439084,0.0016578947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002734092,0.000016316946,0.00026394942,0.000027908973,0.0000414699,0.0000068413333,0.010792965,0.00005717485,0.000079775025,0.0081634475,0.98023665,0.000040075603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2098376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36808872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050957784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000562519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79542416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390957819","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0056","title":"Appellate review of foreign law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Deference; Common law; Law of the case; Precedent; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.012266900019474995,"score_gpt":0.26173264205854985,"score_spread":0.24946574203907484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390957819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005208827,0.011490328,0.0004464396,0.0007116778,0.0002065946,0.000045462726,0.000008145234,0.000009576347,0.9865609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703256,0.024571383,0.0004975936,0.00014565626,0.00016699501,1.1557673e-8,0.000002458968,0.0000027854787,0.0042875228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999481,0.000058325986,0.00009011975,0.000047363552,0.00025351858,0.00006965731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996578,0.000029960696,0.00007696775,0.00003421516,0.00015880162,0.000042273226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041159338,0.000030147532,0.000081998376,0.000007488598,0.00023358599,0.000014521237,0.0001515544,0.000028035285,0.0027584361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008913602,0.000030757987,0.0001027573,0.000019882606,0.00013277636,0.00040818224,0.000015295358,0.00005229497,0.000011578359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052643522,0.000008454451,0.000013671344,0.00014591687,0.000025242905,0.000008939345,0.00086745655,0.0000013312001,0.000022924954,0.9950986,0.0023592773,0.0014429322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075507116,0.000026677717,0.000044169145,0.0018657459,0.000035128523,0.0000046127375,0.001187632,0.000016748985,0.000057099896,0.0077036805,0.9889408,0.000042236963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08771098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0885178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016980474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065155116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99815315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390957837","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0124","title":"Time for a pluralist approach? Judicial review of non-state decision makers in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Private law; Jurisdiction; Public law; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Administrative law; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.010678757702769924,"score_gpt":0.2579974893549134,"score_spread":0.24731873165214346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390957837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09970153,0.043652005,0.016270276,0.012880629,0.0010385247,0.0024378956,0.00072279735,0.00004444641,0.8232519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97684777,0.014351318,0.006663802,0.00021368465,0.00014162615,5.050332e-7,0.000008915493,0.000008593712,0.0017637864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994426,0.000030379255,0.00013341561,0.000075339005,0.00020643763,0.0001118708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996389,0.00006982497,0.0000788543,0.000053935335,0.000086876666,0.00007159938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003836475,0.000039055645,0.0001337235,0.00001077347,0.00021690443,0.0000115283965,0.00020472144,0.000019165487,0.00030344396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017857195,0.000039860246,0.000076075565,0.000053055184,0.000081307226,0.00019204365,0.000025311998,0.000062847634,0.0000012735356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057627173,0.0003793178,0.0006660559,0.004632901,0.0004137369,0.0001670771,0.046348553,0.001097503,0.0006033312,0.36286208,0.37952387,0.20272927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033010473,0.000024876186,0.00047002197,0.0016254564,0.000042468677,0.0000021749684,0.0047201286,0.0012450651,0.0000071742998,0.00052415044,0.9909145,0.00009385082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87714624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087698526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091676967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33224985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390957838","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0047","title":"Abysmal jurisprudence: On the genesis of John Finnis’s practical guide to statesmen","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Humanity; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Law; Action (physics); Epistemology; Transcendental number; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02703113758526892,"score_gpt":0.26316192122048887,"score_spread":0.23613078363521994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390957838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076539814,0.0013559908,0.0002035081,0.017828992,0.00080182974,0.00011204433,0.000072906776,0.000025845196,0.90305907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99174166,0.00016812602,0.00047267278,0.00027034053,0.00037327138,7.462148e-8,9.299014e-7,0.0000062502804,0.0069666887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993455,0.00009832641,0.00013924511,0.000101008816,0.00018552966,0.000130429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934,0.0002663282,0.00007766128,0.00012597068,0.0001193249,0.00007072462],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036422742,0.00008179098,0.00013739738,0.000025563508,0.00047722296,0.000043228585,0.00025065977,0.00004029685,0.01635786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002355379,0.00006086292,0.00012132528,0.000010111685,0.0003708842,0.00029494803,0.00005496026,0.00017497421,0.00006364154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017235291,0.000048950693,0.000015462734,0.000013474283,0.00012228599,0.000064569125,0.016733347,0.0000145528975,0.000037140348,0.91412044,0.06800242,0.0006549838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016358672,0.00044227697,0.00026729435,0.0000981118,0.00009156875,0.000029809182,0.0143861985,0.000026017455,0.00008213277,0.008406301,0.97591126,0.00009541361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008352592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012039416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91520184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060524348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007296236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399155853","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2023_0152","title":"On lizard pumps and the self-determination of Karen Knop","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Courage; Supreme court; Diversity (politics); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.005249701019471866,"score_gpt":0.20070226948507108,"score_spread":0.19545256846559922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399155853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06178918,0.005157134,0.000175299,0.003386156,0.0008943258,0.00014202349,0.000021951186,0.000034369692,0.92839956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911112,0.0023372741,0.00014985134,0.000027591084,0.00009162061,1.7088002e-8,2.8454514e-7,0.0000022505317,0.0062798825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961704,0.00008276478,0.000047074696,0.000043265147,0.000153181,0.000056686855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997483,0.00007008847,0.00004480581,0.00003631958,0.000048318976,0.000052175452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003209896,0.000022460488,0.00006173862,0.000036748603,0.0006960081,0.000076198485,0.00011338093,0.000026030251,0.0007051338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016141454,0.000023114775,0.00005296675,0.000022254364,0.000481992,0.00026978157,0.000013220302,0.00006264698,0.0000033491353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063256906,0.000021931148,0.0000184306,0.00003054137,0.000041861076,0.000039340703,0.069748715,0.0000019266715,0.000010538243,0.896946,0.0076418044,0.025435667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035322105,0.00004282414,0.0004348392,0.000065062086,0.000057312987,0.0000064347623,0.00816303,0.000084055064,0.0000021864314,0.002585594,0.988163,0.00004242768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68772805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95938987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004896589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001726976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7720721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399155869","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0123","title":"Private citizen of the world: Karen Knop’s scholarship","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and World Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018976772801084438,"score_gpt":0.2232383596132863,"score_spread":0.20426158681220186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399155869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12347821,0.0058879936,0.000015834255,0.0011647523,0.0011180702,0.0000948339,0.0000666916,0.000026479755,0.86814713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94694364,0.000034901917,0.0000679427,0.00005121395,0.00026958087,1.8749974e-8,0.0000013868421,0.00000448488,0.052626804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994854,0.00006853875,0.000107675114,0.000076262855,0.00016245288,0.00009968271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996108,0.000037963146,0.00007878339,0.00011711531,0.00011289606,0.00004244969],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012692357,0.00007192796,0.00012591308,0.000029415854,0.0004195655,0.00012732395,0.0003064567,0.000017963544,0.008028375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000032571897,0.000052175867,0.0001680586,0.000024265384,0.00022824675,0.00053654565,0.00007680529,0.00022875672,0.000008824107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003512375,0.000022611015,0.0002571467,0.000028360671,0.00010483068,0.0000152124085,0.020121573,0.0000025994166,0.00014789545,0.9612722,0.017037978,0.0009544867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017483639,0.000030004476,0.0014473066,0.0002891777,0.0000475334,0.0000065062095,0.0016647548,0.000009061665,0.00015827351,0.0031623826,0.9929451,0.00006507085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014138133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099103995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9759071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008087807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033154196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99287844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399155886","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0165","title":"Possibility in paradox: Karen Knop re/stated","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.014764602534148893,"score_gpt":0.27822329748327057,"score_spread":0.26345869494912166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399155886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47960943,0.00041085685,0.00007209309,0.0006356405,0.000443007,0.000060894363,0.000011827332,0.000028177134,0.5187281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99007547,0.00007970719,0.00018607988,0.000017529204,0.00011699238,1.507888e-8,0.0000017386268,0.000002366329,0.009520122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926794,0.00011832155,0.00010671245,0.000102348495,0.00026420064,0.00014048556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965906,0.00005412377,0.000044011973,0.00005503217,0.000107740016,0.000080025355],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046413043,0.000047112517,0.00008989578,0.000024652565,0.00044552982,0.00006307323,0.0002445042,0.000052526022,0.0051731043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010651844,0.000047006764,0.00007770984,0.000021547597,0.00021673841,0.0006251227,0.000022737651,0.00013131116,0.000022144128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003956791,0.00003698325,0.00029696204,0.000005668361,0.0000244223,0.00013767672,0.015556169,0.000005970076,0.000011948192,0.9822579,0.00096638507,0.00066033157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073908176,0.00011509537,0.017914824,0.00025308548,0.00003829563,0.000012369953,0.009574927,0.00022551916,0.000036874906,0.19087113,0.77997637,0.00024241734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23169734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78122646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7913868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067979813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016159513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399155888","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0001","title":"History and contestation: On teaching <i>Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Space (punctuation); Law; International law; Sociology; Conversation; Humility; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013461155105898761,"score_gpt":0.24134894252279387,"score_spread":0.2278877874168951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399155888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36600283,0.00037725695,0.00009378275,0.00064051547,0.0006411315,0.00005552045,0.0000053710983,0.00002763667,0.63215595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959922,0.00017494101,0.0003889965,0.00007978802,0.00010403789,2.1804523e-8,0.000001117741,0.0000018807764,0.0032570139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994703,0.00008260119,0.00006476812,0.00009179436,0.00022321867,0.000067307345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997287,0.0000869801,0.000045641023,0.000022120783,0.000065555905,0.000050993483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037308398,0.000042881828,0.00005980245,0.00003469099,0.0008599701,0.00003718013,0.00011268834,0.000036542064,0.0003866641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008462063,0.0000475064,0.000025787846,0.000004000979,0.00017435692,0.0008132421,0.00006396275,0.00012542441,0.0000018215889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020430907,0.00002996612,0.00023399334,0.0000057402403,0.000015080841,0.00005289609,0.037664603,7.878442e-7,0.000005527582,0.9609026,0.00018869585,0.00087970623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000971487,0.00015447334,0.008823835,0.00026477038,0.0000390783,0.000035203488,0.0065093194,0.0010212653,0.0000059414056,0.04394454,0.93803054,0.00019955453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040193204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118798785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93784183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009604097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037364378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9661982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173316","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2023_0163","title":"Private international law’s ambivalent humanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Humanism; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.015077751754143142,"score_gpt":0.2671355663726974,"score_spread":0.25205781461855425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018368823,0.00071557285,0.0007841223,0.0024988807,0.0018803779,0.00005077443,0.000008063175,0.000055233297,0.97563815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99032336,0.0011520649,0.00037586907,0.000059063233,0.0004878293,1.9291779e-8,0.0000014792556,0.0000037434663,0.007596592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934256,0.000049868828,0.00008336177,0.0000857071,0.0003209301,0.00011758237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970216,0.000020072783,0.000051351006,0.000051527684,0.00008493492,0.00008994353],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031624385,0.000045871304,0.00006842981,0.000016088343,0.00070579135,0.00010857453,0.00025296494,0.000047245878,0.0051757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000040554705,0.000051420702,0.00010597861,0.000016135622,0.00020199637,0.00068582856,0.000046262005,0.00010410898,0.000019948142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014233389,0.000023440834,0.000056145098,0.0000039868523,0.000057610985,0.000047671612,0.011335407,0.0000028241047,0.00014191645,0.98134756,0.0013606456,0.0056085587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001520893,0.0000320073,0.000614104,0.0000474342,0.000022463008,0.0000075837775,0.0034464155,0.00003492603,0.000022435406,0.0026235336,0.99294007,0.000056919303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08148535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1934053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041159347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050856208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173337","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0005","title":"The law of international society: A road not taken","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012847067317860355,"score_gpt":0.2566588880102314,"score_spread":0.24381182069237103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027411148,0.00056180777,0.00015029882,0.0036338803,0.0013164767,0.00005132131,0.000023073675,0.000018562814,0.9668334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738605,0.00037507617,0.00027460064,0.0000631137,0.00035532625,2.474819e-8,0.0000012393797,0.0000026026771,0.025067521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927026,0.000042691398,0.00010035728,0.00006528321,0.000418884,0.00010253484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995262,0.00007469151,0.00008102286,0.00004899806,0.00022043401,0.000048641992],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042549314,0.000041348085,0.00006659331,0.0000068191944,0.0010194136,0.00008876239,0.00045397418,0.00004133918,0.0013555603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000057868056,0.00003304863,0.00019014507,0.000009361999,0.0005371956,0.00046419885,0.00004010319,0.000101068814,0.000009623473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023431094,0.000014178123,0.0000069154453,0.000002537164,0.00012570068,0.0000091964785,0.008787514,0.0000025845425,0.00004896045,0.98613936,0.0040943725,0.00074524985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014457587,0.000023018145,0.00020900895,0.000041548654,0.00002113565,0.0000044422036,0.0038473273,0.00009764798,0.000048304104,0.017633285,0.9778847,0.000045014996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09185807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2697964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97379035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031305602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012511345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173355","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0320","title":"Editor’s introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.010783776986596575,"score_gpt":0.2568700634690322,"score_spread":0.2460862864824356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077428403,0.002436414,0.0016348788,0.02057576,0.023260223,0.00007586786,0.00000818221,0.00009888954,0.94416696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769268,0.00085460435,0.0002837881,0.00002193572,0.01587024,6.906331e-9,6.292736e-7,0.0000033929914,0.0060385955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952006,0.000063744854,0.000042213844,0.000065671375,0.00021234908,0.00009594999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997536,0.000028416172,0.000031550087,0.000041871444,0.00007954149,0.00006502364],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004597121,0.000030095594,0.00005128986,0.000010920618,0.00075805123,0.000068156856,0.00013633628,0.00005166201,0.0024416957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013840001,0.00003258267,0.000058935344,0.00001772819,0.00021368549,0.00062788476,0.000017352331,0.00014944469,0.000015528563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010202698,0.000018660467,0.000007795058,0.000006099291,0.000030269792,0.000021510554,0.016563088,0.0000020280636,0.00022644606,0.8716054,0.10580161,0.005706918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047950947,0.000022681303,0.00005653326,0.000015790756,0.00001325317,0.000004399823,0.007968457,0.000010699221,0.000018471694,0.0037909264,0.98801345,0.000037400787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057056483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1160204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002949635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105208856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173373","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0023","title":"Private citizen of the faculty: Some reflections on a colleague, scholar, teacher, and friend","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.03188651589341995,"score_gpt":0.3103022722752983,"score_spread":0.2784157563818783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3477524,0.0023521325,0.00006323381,0.0043216697,0.0009318132,0.00014389073,0.000079918325,0.000033376007,0.64432156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98727053,0.001015228,0.00034359397,0.000060895374,0.00026649173,2.8032241e-8,4.1688241e-7,0.0000038439794,0.011038972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934894,0.00013591048,0.000082657236,0.000071935894,0.00023007237,0.000130465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996737,0.00005147822,0.00006847487,0.00006189184,0.000052711373,0.0000917413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004006694,0.000047470545,0.00008884598,0.000016757003,0.0010629472,0.00003129867,0.00023070289,0.000092194976,0.00028364916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005632436,0.000039113354,0.00007493242,0.000046417063,0.00048625478,0.00037465282,0.000051920786,0.00032559087,0.0000020183888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018348124,0.000021334426,0.0003597007,0.00001014057,0.000059021364,0.000005592076,0.025656914,0.000004563755,0.00015943251,0.96350926,0.009475262,0.0007204065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026475123,0.00006162134,0.0014709164,0.00011504687,0.000056368892,0.000007679909,0.023717774,0.000014000426,0.000052429914,0.0088448515,0.96533036,0.0000641766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026368454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022404388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95585513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024350722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012549238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99543417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173382","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0006","title":"‘Private’ diplomacy and nuclear disarmament: Revisiting the Cold War activism of Women for a Meaningful Summit","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disarmament; Summit; Cold war; Diplomacy; Political science; Nuclear weapon; Political economy; International trade; Law; Sociology; Politics; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.012030217743715108,"score_gpt":0.26927338310778554,"score_spread":0.25724316536407044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44239953,0.001435185,0.0012565239,0.00156684,0.00011170513,0.0002428456,0.000040837585,0.000025774216,0.55292076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998318,0.0005232551,0.00042339563,0.000020684445,0.00016682141,7.973019e-8,3.147725e-7,0.0000040272826,0.00054343033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995189,0.000044817418,0.00008199991,0.000057864407,0.0001684676,0.00012798354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995941,0.00013969722,0.000087401386,0.000038279642,0.000080076206,0.000060455983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049364584,0.00003808543,0.00007924304,0.000016116006,0.0006724743,0.000040211413,0.0001579142,0.000028040176,0.00033739416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041785897,0.000032472497,0.00006780614,0.000024528832,0.00019979427,0.0003917759,0.000039148686,0.00006912166,0.0000011502095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019771047,0.0000063157863,0.00010653174,0.000012474664,0.00006845097,0.0000019338693,0.03551958,0.0000027596836,0.00011896298,0.9621346,0.00018192337,0.0018267095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037590755,0.00008294045,0.00083810074,0.00018387563,0.00006076301,0.0000043750065,0.07271322,0.00047848758,0.000022854309,0.027990289,0.897163,0.00008619689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052899113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081118505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041472196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042172807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7996799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173393","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0007","title":"My own pink world: Feminist diplomacy after culture","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01261164017243876,"score_gpt":0.2673832752390351,"score_spread":0.25477163506659634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069290525,0.0079203695,0.00013052406,0.0016409138,0.0007412203,0.00008057438,0.000019491124,0.000065070155,0.9824728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525838,0.0011229347,0.00033027574,0.00016457606,0.0005482872,6.189217e-8,0.0000010841915,0.0000058258574,0.04524314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906605,0.000100941725,0.000098560755,0.00014533507,0.00034859692,0.0002405113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952173,0.00002484009,0.0000558109,0.00009564527,0.00009205026,0.00020991045],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002618363,0.00009050534,0.00013016237,0.000028987755,0.0008339338,0.00016166073,0.0003478923,0.00007736535,0.005426228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064461997,0.000089933055,0.00018411859,0.000066667744,0.00030932098,0.00051265664,0.00006226298,0.00021036842,0.000044010805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016206439,0.00014694179,0.0031479667,0.00007376762,0.00028273306,0.0006444985,0.4225804,0.0000019691504,0.000108126595,0.49047297,0.06986791,0.012510665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017012979,0.000032646672,0.0009471541,0.000062323845,0.00004866239,0.000011528074,0.040010512,0.000005991741,0.000007377772,0.0015085515,0.9570841,0.00011102093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034055118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2709123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94565475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003043552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014011715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173395","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0142","title":"The right to have private rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.00813369998721891,"score_gpt":0.2493610512684378,"score_spread":0.2412273512812189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038760997,0.00036048092,0.00041801113,0.0027069948,0.0010358574,0.00008286422,0.000006721487,0.000029665645,0.9565984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93944734,0.000059048707,0.00031192283,0.000041020132,0.0004181057,2.9230915e-8,4.437161e-7,0.0000026316245,0.059719454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992792,0.0000751523,0.00007698809,0.00008095075,0.00033272282,0.00015499849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956864,0.0000833068,0.000036845893,0.00006546179,0.00012497953,0.00012077572],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036573468,0.00004719625,0.00006188528,0.000013921559,0.002725987,0.00015907448,0.0004175537,0.000034878103,0.0022917124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000054858415,0.000032940447,0.000092903356,0.000010729512,0.00023503168,0.00039723507,0.00003454446,0.000096598145,0.00007529402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001688515,0.000007899806,0.0000046880946,0.000001143311,0.000038377464,0.00005777261,0.0055948496,0.0000022600063,0.0000110865185,0.9892541,0.0047137816,0.00029711623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060046466,0.000024304696,0.000087003405,0.00003164326,0.000012159267,0.0000046543864,0.0005459095,0.000012016076,0.000043307697,0.108629994,0.8905022,0.00004672899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0509132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59724784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003754594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006620814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173893","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2024_0010","title":"Trade law as foreign relations law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011346325241881354,"score_gpt":0.20157671482210202,"score_spread":0.19023038958022065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001445378,0.00022734921,0.00037738247,0.0023279905,0.000356568,0.000058070164,0.0000040151635,0.000056932568,0.99514633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907218,0.000021976923,0.00040206252,0.005564453,0.0005245238,7.1283516e-8,0.000015777061,0.000008945128,0.002740383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940085,0.000008790444,0.00013170874,0.00010671734,0.00023657334,0.00011533337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972624,0.000019185427,0.0000874795,0.00006814005,0.000078004145,0.000020970165],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013505381,0.000081677514,0.00008856603,0.00003104823,0.000518762,0.00022292485,0.00018610717,0.000046209872,0.007061112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004198445,0.00008390143,0.00013340497,0.00003760717,0.00013409114,0.0031874096,0.00004064948,0.0001272326,0.00028768077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018889747,0.000032660966,0.0000146200255,0.000015876662,0.000058253398,0.00004191315,0.000116031086,0.000029142207,0.00010298,0.9883216,0.011164078,0.00008397256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028114524,0.0000168401,0.000095601994,0.0000619832,0.000058818467,0.00002143927,0.0006560479,0.0017569364,0.000040407576,0.06081396,0.9361015,0.000095309224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034607396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033628207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99240595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001400809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020339132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173933","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0143","title":"Rehoming diplomacy: Privilege and possibility in the international law of diplomatic relations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Diplomacy; Privilege (computing); Political science; Law; International law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.010841228235912081,"score_gpt":0.21498657315728417,"score_spread":0.2041453449213721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22375858,0.000257971,0.00025144772,0.001972507,0.00024254898,0.00009729663,0.000005044896,0.000015622252,0.773399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986452,0.000021015921,0.00034298774,0.00065761,0.0001306629,9.585901e-8,0.0000050281183,0.0000032118292,0.00019420001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944425,0.000016077862,0.00016948376,0.0000827391,0.00022516584,0.00006226534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966514,0.00005808156,0.00011416528,0.0000647799,0.000090711415,0.0000071218255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038494382,0.000054108426,0.000078134515,0.000042717293,0.00015773447,0.000118063246,0.00022155131,0.000023830047,0.0006509543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020138517,0.000044804976,0.00005755381,0.000041176074,0.00012468144,0.0017846546,0.00006443629,0.00009930548,0.0000073401925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017799905,0.000046143025,0.0019100725,0.000032447922,0.00003071643,0.000011434689,0.00063017715,0.00001041478,0.00017070473,0.99660826,0.00040770945,0.00012410016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024221244,0.0000854885,0.12518682,0.0010967628,0.00025116763,0.00009062266,0.0105852615,0.04247911,0.00012423181,0.30971384,0.5075335,0.0004310582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007865478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024093162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7748866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008241116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015160683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085657","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0151","title":"Why we should think about democratic frontsliding as well as democratic backsliding","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024495461010879946,"score_gpt":0.2640620831361423,"score_spread":0.23956662212526236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02073783,0.005760987,0.0005517686,0.0049509243,0.0013224976,0.00008098005,0.0000048498655,0.00006857536,0.96652156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186062,0.0036608123,0.0009474108,0.0012514996,0.0008317052,9.570613e-8,0.0000015646185,0.000017224074,0.07468348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875146,0.00015260508,0.00020302826,0.0001956615,0.00027875972,0.0004184653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991697,0.00015729685,0.000086375236,0.00010051693,0.00006027628,0.00042585115],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057188777,0.00012753681,0.0002465712,0.00003839426,0.0019420006,0.00014342391,0.0003997937,0.00013575685,0.017211609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000403968,0.00013493159,0.000229691,0.0000348364,0.00035526534,0.001214867,0.00005290742,0.00026652293,0.0005437366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066969566,0.000082924555,0.00012427868,0.00009710197,0.00022554539,0.0004366154,0.050125018,0.00003312354,0.00017729955,0.6620349,0.27999723,0.006598935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022367433,0.00007428034,0.000027555048,0.00022420408,0.00009021682,0.000033887085,0.02373162,0.00030358956,0.00002264756,0.04172168,0.9333709,0.00017575959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08934872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08102679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8978684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009611897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027711617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085671","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0021","title":"Unjust enrichment in law and equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Equity (law); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Restitution","score_opus":0.021927008087945787,"score_gpt":0.3043307091853372,"score_spread":0.28240370109739144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01729985,0.0014756185,0.00034222062,0.0022220584,0.00010664445,0.00006041812,0.000006514404,0.000015521166,0.97847116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978192,0.0007633129,0.00031641388,0.000050593237,0.000062840874,2.5869637e-8,2.8045028e-7,0.0000013185432,0.0009860538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996132,0.00003595972,0.000053831216,0.00006607743,0.00012990473,0.00010098355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980783,0.000026522566,0.000022311156,0.00003836285,0.000024308993,0.00008068061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003122488,0.000028824252,0.000054297834,0.00000788547,0.0004282897,0.00005631309,0.00012668337,0.00002995602,0.0005133599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000028513643,0.000030582236,0.000029027291,0.000025581745,0.00023885322,0.00045065078,0.00007199093,0.00008231587,0.000004547015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003693321,0.000017080021,0.00008650613,0.0000052587416,0.000006981408,0.000013331838,0.0064648474,0.0000032647877,0.00004110048,0.9903389,0.00033496512,0.00268406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013011596,0.000017460638,0.00076701125,0.000029755727,0.0000121763405,0.0000028718143,0.010303084,0.00004042641,0.000006346464,0.006233491,0.98241025,0.000046990208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24072489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59576374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030740479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057066383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76433116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085703","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0074","title":"Family lawyers on cohabitation and judge-made law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Law; Political science; Family law; Sociology","score_opus":0.013498242166093787,"score_gpt":0.25600637802477283,"score_spread":0.24250813585867903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15505332,0.0019088736,0.00028049506,0.002142068,0.00068511884,0.00007859245,0.000007875774,0.000053200445,0.83979046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99717516,0.0010164198,0.00016212398,0.00011992664,0.00015536607,1.9286768e-8,7.576559e-7,0.000003306964,0.0013668982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994264,0.00007309545,0.000066288725,0.000091043476,0.00023126551,0.00011186665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997005,0.000050530296,0.00004114324,0.000041490137,0.000062531304,0.000103798724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031693533,0.0000485324,0.000076761775,0.0000167697,0.0007685504,0.00008263817,0.00008893147,0.000057792102,0.0002752677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005928247,0.00005298241,0.000058127614,0.000024650688,0.00026259062,0.0005610234,0.000015187982,0.0001001398,0.000008161671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044380537,0.000021016918,0.00010115287,0.000009795984,0.00003690724,0.000028014321,0.018677857,0.000007365439,0.00037581284,0.96466523,0.0017144978,0.014317969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002682524,0.00014502996,0.0036513344,0.00009548017,0.000040629053,0.0000049375117,0.016104475,0.00006571694,0.000020050824,0.0015229329,0.9779966,0.000084572406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10656919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15944493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022427272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047916947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89938027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085720","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0045","title":"Judicial review as a quasi-administrative jurisdiction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Administrative law; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.06516211597671469,"score_gpt":0.377156321890533,"score_spread":0.3119942059138183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085720","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.6829268e-8,0.5488583,0.0000052708915,0.00016745362,0.0004520746,0.00011628556,0.000021916014,0.000013998399,0.45036465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000011955297,0.98710394,0.00006313488,0.00006649699,0.00066145795,1.4663911e-7,0.000006922616,0.00001130606,0.012074646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983754,0.00047090751,0.00030698354,0.00018348238,0.0004957564,0.0001674483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900293,0.000072781986,0.0004536768,0.000089075766,0.00024986628,0.00013164387],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006578992,0.00017645127,0.0007599225,0.000028506913,0.0008644227,0.000051289277,0.00046319727,0.00010672085,0.0023166025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007463932,0.00015957282,0.0006808768,0.000060565155,0.0004017705,0.00032555705,0.0000860559,0.00035290315,0.0002815977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098570545,0.000070337344,1.4204392e-7,0.0044236234,0.0006294665,0.00020172191,0.002780058,9.2610914e-9,1.1526219e-8,0.6219762,0.06932941,0.30057916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004982726,0.000120195786,3.1059946e-7,0.03099767,0.0013700299,0.000038198483,0.0013701377,5.8723646e-8,9.304956e-9,0.0002618371,0.96565783,0.00013390422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024280824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075206235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8963284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084279565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006074537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523653","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0004","title":"When judges are not judging","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.024763917333902312,"score_gpt":0.3087551784044162,"score_spread":0.28399126107051387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008052153,0.00014816104,0.0006172245,0.082054846,0.0005665498,0.000040262817,0.0000026674552,0.000017879376,0.90850025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977427,0.00015756604,0.0018482426,0.0009638839,0.00010944958,2.0529782e-8,6.256177e-7,0.000001430586,0.019491754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951494,0.00010684964,0.00007413702,0.000055365992,0.0001509826,0.00009771326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993723,0.00008888791,0.0001424495,0.000065007065,0.00027689672,0.00005445369],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041612523,0.00003221566,0.000066613466,0.00002623051,0.0012989837,0.00007508615,0.00021215033,0.00004141623,0.0042446144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014502573,0.00003816491,0.000043607666,0.00005357958,0.00014064614,0.0010715694,0.000024090476,0.00017379652,0.000009695729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002648106,0.000069798705,0.0044130613,0.000005240054,0.000046666963,0.0000049124305,0.028102957,0.000004413507,0.000044874898,0.88497883,0.07741783,0.0048849257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015193793,0.000005235681,0.0055292635,0.000020551503,0.000020385003,8.825462e-7,0.07130468,0.0000030896113,0.000016846123,0.0016601089,0.921249,0.000038069877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14950484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33281606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032891444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039334604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523696","doi":"10.3138/ultj-2024-1031","title":"Editor’s note","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.004239539415224225,"score_gpt":0.21665188450017447,"score_spread":0.21241234508495024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069109,0.0009889948,0.0066592786,0.0005297418,0.006849932,0.00010300477,0.00004757652,0.0000870834,0.9778235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763896,0.00018454339,0.009173258,0.00012610963,0.0023875346,1.6226057e-8,0.0000037815348,0.00002245087,0.011712699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992498,0.00007488655,0.00011403278,0.00011176515,0.0002560363,0.00019344466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992817,0.000037828384,0.00014726946,0.00017508435,0.00024198343,0.00011611218],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025907278,0.0000886815,0.00016930919,0.000037125657,0.00047180033,0.000022672035,0.00042773972,0.00007638236,0.0023122188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020999792,0.00010399624,0.0001453343,0.000043370488,0.00017112575,0.0006297636,0.0001093486,0.00018098361,0.0001575233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050568,0.00020282918,0.00082655915,0.000022890768,0.00025898643,0.00011550976,0.0014220978,0.00018259308,0.0046942905,0.06282506,0.9255792,0.003364327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011921799,0.000049955383,0.0025574993,0.00007119197,0.00008994729,0.00001714509,0.0015263857,0.00013585459,0.00027879697,0.00044134073,0.9935364,0.00010329407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029426029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09575491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008891639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012529446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523726","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0002","title":"LexOptima: The promise of AI-enabled legal systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.015636912651205172,"score_gpt":0.283403782770766,"score_spread":0.26776687011956085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043749124,0.0013481654,0.0046459176,0.0033854044,0.001211764,0.00034286876,0.000007030987,0.000026737891,0.945283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903516,0.0001309368,0.0002168896,0.00004537178,0.00009450817,7.0065205e-8,1.77416e-7,0.0000023643972,0.009158043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898094,0.00025179726,0.00018523246,0.00008660439,0.00030897878,0.0001864506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990961,0.00011367841,0.00018876577,0.00014194119,0.0003911625,0.00006835919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008478812,0.000060757306,0.00016674823,0.000018690711,0.0012397495,0.000053964035,0.0006152648,0.000073826974,0.00066779944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067739704,0.000052497853,0.00011592167,0.00006271398,0.0010917749,0.00060207973,0.000065699634,0.00016571932,0.000005037348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008508206,0.000057966838,0.00035502,0.000014122714,0.00006399387,0.000011436684,0.012359655,0.00043365196,0.00017082278,0.98033243,0.005321123,0.00079469284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025382094,0.000079977915,0.0002223975,0.00015980563,0.00010022938,0.0000046769624,0.12844986,0.00036060478,0.00058250997,0.0031895698,0.86648065,0.000115910654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30814308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20198488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003470835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003349227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9535276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523980","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0033","title":"Marx, justice, and the juridical","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.006863217310059625,"score_gpt":0.23932067711405802,"score_spread":0.2324574598039984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004745153,0.00061004946,0.0005816615,0.009206088,0.00021029792,0.000038531958,0.0000015043737,0.0000059527824,0.9846008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911595,0.0012084689,0.00024321896,0.0005479755,0.00009429996,1.6140453e-8,8.330017e-8,7.3633873e-7,0.006745721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957895,0.0001252824,0.00005529042,0.00004569774,0.00007434029,0.000120422534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996147,0.00017813843,0.0000344636,0.00004333768,0.000038765345,0.00009059966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004833544,0.000027867314,0.0000832954,0.000006168559,0.001065155,0.000025421203,0.0001737567,0.000041707575,0.0006680527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006463025,0.000023072093,0.000048776026,0.000012178998,0.0010773354,0.00019959341,0.00005278523,0.00008822451,0.0000023693121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004948493,0.00000935062,0.00004495194,0.000004159275,0.00001783312,0.0000035919454,0.0015588176,2.1544211e-7,5.48229e-7,0.9929924,0.0024976167,0.0028210543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008886023,0.000010072323,0.0011247261,0.000015075016,0.00011299083,0.0000023511043,0.012553935,0.000017195327,0.0000018474706,0.032628693,0.9526103,0.00003422359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057395827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08647811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099719786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010568739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94888103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406525303","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0133","title":"Myths and misconceptions in extraterritorial torts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.007991150208491234,"score_gpt":0.26759540826327044,"score_spread":0.2596042580547792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406525303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11710238,0.0024850282,0.0003028003,0.00137107,0.002161041,0.00014986815,0.000006531382,0.000017742841,0.8764035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962773,0.00078119105,0.00014955716,0.00003702845,0.0003648066,3.8646327e-8,2.9833592e-7,0.0000012290376,0.0023885574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944764,0.0001266819,0.00008736007,0.00007572403,0.00012675587,0.00013581791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997135,0.000043998574,0.000052395848,0.00004259647,0.00007384767,0.000073704105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028826366,0.000042580283,0.00012182063,0.000018406821,0.0007506986,0.000038354603,0.00012952246,0.00007394549,0.00039537906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023938348,0.00005167761,0.000053088774,0.00003073658,0.00028384046,0.00037033283,0.000019213201,0.00009275289,7.853609e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002272053,0.00014621428,0.012704424,0.00001548911,0.000083624545,0.000075413205,0.13783735,0.0000063411685,0.00037301984,0.81680626,0.007996373,0.023728292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016046572,0.00004068206,0.011206642,0.00007658511,0.000042089345,0.0000012971927,0.14166336,0.000008923466,0.0000066197317,0.0035874792,0.84164405,0.00011760011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17668022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72843814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8791749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029927475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016393757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82880235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406525310","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0039","title":"Chekhov’s gun is being fired","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gun control; Political science; Forensic engineering; Computer security; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.004160155815388647,"score_gpt":0.1946226107348326,"score_spread":0.19046245491944397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406525310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051502917,0.00015946188,0.0011659875,0.0005605428,0.00023680732,0.00003800219,0.000017575843,0.000008537882,0.94631016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921141,0.00004526435,0.00053833675,0.000077402634,0.00007683581,2.13949e-8,0.0000022993086,0.0000024281221,0.0071433014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996145,0.000019360517,0.00008066699,0.00008000429,0.00008987046,0.00011561142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996739,0.000026329008,0.00007692318,0.00008867401,0.00008830914,0.000045870565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000053688233,0.00007114208,0.00014029416,0.000011189762,0.00050316163,0.000016712114,0.0001641048,0.00001952022,0.0036797796],"category_scores_gemma":[8.960793e-7,0.000076217504,0.00013046153,0.000024758028,0.0000587545,0.00017195604,0.00008819728,0.00009488129,0.000010744327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001244977,0.0002651387,0.017905379,0.000029253864,0.00086022425,0.000012467291,0.007890487,0.000038438477,0.00092993013,0.8150885,0.11832134,0.03853433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025510523,0.000079924976,0.007222658,0.00021569323,0.00021408121,0.000002024206,0.018504271,0.00048163126,0.0030477338,0.035118688,0.9322227,0.00033948987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014475283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019591535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9406112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053350446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034307483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408226521","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0025","title":"The laws of the unreasonable victim: Care, mitigation, and strategic deferral","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deferral; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.012034341763393042,"score_gpt":0.18091752038818254,"score_spread":0.1688831786247895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408226521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23545483,0.00985975,0.000114505754,0.00054150453,0.0007174416,0.00012169209,0.00005192678,0.00000481158,0.75313354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818504,0.00083163654,0.000059040864,0.00003500361,0.00004364534,7.025979e-8,7.477678e-7,0.0000030533845,0.00084174215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994778,0.000026046124,0.00025372804,0.000099948906,0.000024951678,0.00011749871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933773,0.000035869452,0.00036133206,0.00015240753,0.000073677824,0.000038980754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000273507,0.000053397707,0.00019792246,0.000014275857,0.0006517963,0.000044295906,0.00027839842,0.000055614597,0.00009869962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010572812,0.00005322883,0.000104684914,0.000030035735,0.00035089368,0.0002009707,0.000060736995,0.00007687629,0.0000026079606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001926327,0.000010717124,0.019196825,0.000016334612,0.000072140545,4.2456173e-7,0.0010122237,0.000026884565,0.0000052591513,0.9791133,0.00036936664,0.00015729669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025817154,0.00015070043,0.077526584,0.00017712916,0.00008459234,0.00002022908,0.049866892,0.00058356294,0.00014171925,0.620911,0.24762405,0.0003318146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046950277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08315075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76273024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020224531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047699083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9593962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408226825","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0008","title":"Deference as informed respect: <i>Vavilov’s</i> implications for procedural review of legislative functions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Cégep de Jonquière","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislature; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02745905059110631,"score_gpt":0.3123904438579811,"score_spread":0.2849313932668748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408226825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004553562,0.00917576,0.001976139,0.009331294,0.00014299207,0.00026998974,0.00004072365,0.0000108985905,0.97859687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494994,0.042643055,0.0013306662,0.00093342963,0.000122181,0.0000019110123,0.0000074417267,0.0000023999376,0.00545948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952656,0.00003288024,0.00014092716,0.00006552101,0.00012517211,0.00010895713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988954,0.00012862842,0.00017117838,0.00005349769,0.00070383685,0.000047449153],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020066045,0.00004609117,0.00014717248,0.000016130674,0.001365648,0.000007915474,0.00018838307,0.00003061865,0.00020091934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026907245,0.00004697097,0.00011533091,0.00008669852,0.0005320075,0.0003228954,0.00003616289,0.00005309952,0.0000018901861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042787542,0.00003071684,0.00052525324,0.00008258241,0.00006798525,1.9589912e-7,0.0019318338,8.5924137e-7,0.000018858253,0.9788732,0.016308548,0.0021171947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029019895,0.00006447019,0.004891777,0.0011905219,0.0001250275,0.000001946913,0.011330765,3.150405e-7,0.000010048101,0.02794187,0.9540869,0.00006616548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05696863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24860285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025735178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087092805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408511282","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0053","title":"Contracting Without Promising","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.010012354597544345,"score_gpt":0.2176820259032647,"score_spread":0.20766967130572034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408511282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040584326,0.00027980816,0.0009089918,0.0014179711,0.0003117593,0.00008662283,6.2251655e-7,0.000040951825,0.9563689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965305,0.000017990373,0.00045640365,0.00055375486,0.00042649216,2.6937087e-8,0.0000013848488,0.000004027994,0.0020094528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949086,0.000007950937,0.000114614464,0.0000844366,0.00013311373,0.00016900524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994849,0.000014700166,0.0002230075,0.00008179691,0.00018267264,0.00001292041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029784394,0.00007488379,0.00013564868,0.000054131277,0.00051563577,0.00014363835,0.00025812586,0.00004062279,0.00086517684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038937313,0.0000795547,0.000076126926,0.00005373778,0.00005297265,0.002158296,0.000099427445,0.000112492,0.00001182001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002728761,0.00015289773,0.02887685,0.00016601454,0.000254797,0.000023519005,0.0003943315,0.000016044227,0.002065131,0.91330326,0.027370118,0.027104154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016130975,0.000008467977,0.0077505517,0.00016740909,0.00012068011,0.0000057202424,0.0016674395,0.00056384574,0.00006029232,0.003910035,0.983981,0.00015144175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030821273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018826522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9566109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011275619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004112143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411054569","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0077","title":"Constitutional silence, section 36, and public services on Indian reserves","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Business; Art; Advertising; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.013415727894647027,"score_gpt":0.18240255632641983,"score_spread":0.1689868284317728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411054569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23717445,0.0050086426,0.00051584473,0.0016606051,0.0005555832,0.00005490991,0.00008598722,0.000012358321,0.7549316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820954,0.0008208235,0.00014314924,0.000104732215,0.000055549932,7.0500754e-8,0.0000023995394,7.173228e-7,0.000663029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996179,0.000010023377,0.00012375669,0.00011470329,0.00003544158,0.000098187396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969804,0.00002136602,0.00011817673,0.00005253721,0.000060119506,0.00004974841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001276755,0.0000563881,0.00013132337,0.000041282456,0.00067838194,0.000043666987,0.00011989666,0.000046469002,0.00038935224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000100997095,0.00006415979,0.00005045366,0.000039380142,0.00041153448,0.00053926447,0.000057247933,0.00009244132,0.000010187512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003724075,0.000040164974,0.030585617,0.000016658147,0.00008209817,0.0000058212718,0.00020722531,0.000019171823,0.0000023743225,0.96826017,0.00037474342,0.00036873517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011382974,0.00011484321,0.13640851,0.00011901009,0.000015190848,0.000029739336,0.0045027,0.00007815588,0.000012799859,0.030728227,0.8266753,0.00017724841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020937841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017178383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93753195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001656708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030093432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9855818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411055867","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0081","title":"Ethics for traveling judges","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0661092475760345,"score_gpt":0.3611830205292944,"score_spread":0.2950737729532599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411055867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012135441,0.0016777855,0.014051092,0.006852992,0.00047276766,0.00009592576,0.000009222968,0.000011495068,0.96469325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897108,0.0010100721,0.0018538744,0.00016503713,0.00010511697,4.5268283e-8,5.4213507e-7,0.0000010408294,0.007153478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996225,0.000059580023,0.00005941829,0.00004823776,0.0001304836,0.000079731086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992991,0.00022539058,0.000053915122,0.00002611476,0.0003683993,0.000027077074],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040135553,0.000029807441,0.00007905905,0.0000076748,0.0014107422,0.000017613065,0.0001671583,0.000037290327,0.00029189856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008774842,0.00003241091,0.000077885874,0.000014294138,0.00018768344,0.00019523127,0.00002321905,0.00008364963,9.321456e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034115423,0.000017077275,0.00035081417,0.0000041967533,0.00006381725,6.560941e-7,0.012655791,0.000007329414,0.000026826565,0.9787462,0.0069398903,0.0011533062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002508425,0.000025432724,0.0010132743,0.000029412662,0.000021146363,2.0974169e-7,0.034474004,0.00002110042,0.00003957048,0.0068009505,0.9572892,0.0000348445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037566062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43153894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97757536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019946742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011673474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412797751","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0109","title":"Virtuous or vicious circle? Legitimacy and effectiveness in WTO dispute settlement thirty years on","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Legitimacy; Political science; Settlement (finance); Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.006175919507822212,"score_gpt":0.2517982292743991,"score_spread":0.2456223097665769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412797751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.795187,0.0003661723,0.0008280247,0.008085318,0.0008784219,0.00065011095,0.00003736763,0.00006925797,0.19389834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989616,0.00020372792,0.00016500073,0.00010845974,0.000031053303,6.127168e-8,8.9315415e-7,0.0000037461386,0.00052545784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991855,0.00024839316,0.00009024902,0.00012262026,0.0002052839,0.00014796473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995955,0.00012469714,0.000068701804,0.00007401953,0.00005936369,0.00007771279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004026595,0.000059060567,0.00013643067,0.0000409488,0.00043882232,0.000039574665,0.00016395585,0.000047959256,0.0005438708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027302944,0.00006744233,0.000032263404,0.00009891618,0.00021677521,0.0003227054,0.00005214269,0.000109034016,0.000003366088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073110854,0.00044113642,0.03981665,0.00006800014,0.00018364555,0.000524249,0.0302401,0.00022745201,0.0001838257,0.9037967,0.0018106834,0.02197649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031525374,0.00019684694,0.7816275,0.00036083136,0.000060256923,0.000009532711,0.014369202,0.000021268563,0.00011193391,0.0010236716,0.19884145,0.00022500531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029293936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30741706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90277296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005135847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013452173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97717005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412797945","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0012","title":"On disciplining states","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005491298718677091,"score_gpt":0.22526738476711883,"score_spread":0.21977608604844173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412797945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09606579,0.00034953942,0.0007020571,0.00007139866,0.00015022127,0.000008101012,0.000013221194,0.000016679976,0.902623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96416503,0.00016325925,0.0010105529,0.000053167645,0.000048586076,2.0687903e-8,0.0000056065346,0.0000041241437,0.03454967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996133,0.0000061891487,0.000084632964,0.00009015069,0.00010343907,0.00010232472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966174,0.00004552107,0.00008655183,0.00011671052,0.00003852642,0.000050923998],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000053076215,0.00006265255,0.000096415584,0.0000063438283,0.00039015966,0.000007811128,0.00021111556,0.000042016436,0.00609633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009503421,0.0000699201,0.000063625026,0.0000097675875,0.00009682215,0.00014353343,0.000048740512,0.00014242438,0.0000035459384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004114721,0.0026125137,0.0053263837,0.0015949049,0.0021411858,0.0010254653,0.018338924,0.00773242,0.3342833,0.39596522,0.11649748,0.110367484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018801477,0.00004442712,0.000053037467,0.0006050524,0.000075857526,0.000011313519,0.010945876,0.000113178845,0.039763957,0.0048764055,0.9413991,0.00023163648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035705123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086259574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8680992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033998833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029544844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99481225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102522511","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0055","title":"Seventy-five years of legal education and scholarship at the ‘modern’ Faculty of Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal research; Higher education; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.023926528288515745,"score_gpt":0.3374437462230814,"score_spread":0.3135172179345656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102522511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4229615,0.0005061827,0.000059825725,0.011541953,0.0003629157,0.00009277421,0.00001677108,0.000004225147,0.56445384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98651206,0.00011168005,0.00046564842,0.00015440091,0.000027694754,4.013025e-8,0.0000022596046,0.0000010918861,0.012725126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994654,0.0001473694,0.00010245039,0.00005193168,0.00017156271,0.00006126651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992211,0.00009856818,0.00021162491,0.000071411414,0.00036070668,0.000036622052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005020541,0.00002972467,0.00007180517,0.000018238869,0.000563775,0.000027015309,0.00016921759,0.000040393767,0.00040914578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010833001,0.000029865563,0.000039624025,0.000058675672,0.00035531545,0.0008837176,0.000038038062,0.000143513,9.19086e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039215036,0.00011547957,0.0012508285,0.00000885338,0.000047105717,3.1752927e-7,0.032061726,0.0000045042425,0.00021465916,0.95369816,0.0031707059,0.0093884375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002612927,0.000022920922,0.026477706,0.00005017376,0.000060252845,0.000003113438,0.039129686,0.0000027941082,0.00015656585,0.0057726055,0.92801654,0.0000463557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22591858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24082287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94792557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020054482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006375084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7792361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102574942","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0036","title":"Trebilcock and trade-offs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technocracy; Normative; Scholarship; Variety (cybernetics); Theme (computing); Politics; Relation (database); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.009671858974177336,"score_gpt":0.24612016569689543,"score_spread":0.2364483067227181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102574942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023330139,0.00067562767,0.00014672593,0.0018983395,0.00017277876,0.000026586766,0.000002117743,0.000008630045,0.973739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848595,0.0009746985,0.00022298488,0.00022197654,0.0000620822,3.2140908e-9,2.2037275e-7,0.0000012396572,0.013657238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996214,0.000079334546,0.000055422573,0.000050833183,0.00011640441,0.00007658744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997737,0.000038488357,0.000047475038,0.00003233205,0.000046268615,0.00006175636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020241883,0.000030243333,0.00006256072,0.000011348047,0.00050771714,0.000028180017,0.00015616864,0.000025450408,0.00073193514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018527466,0.000033068936,0.000043266547,0.0000137748475,0.00019407598,0.0003346172,0.000021184858,0.00006344761,0.0000020020375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026722952,0.000020795962,0.0005248375,0.0000018584078,0.000028229864,0.000010231738,0.0019213004,8.2746215e-7,0.000055892033,0.9902898,0.0026331097,0.0044863746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030895203,0.000021846923,0.0074135223,0.000023256596,0.000014793582,0.0000014844056,0.0034811466,0.000010552087,0.000011935387,0.0007449669,0.98793346,0.000034060842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018844554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0695695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98954487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011737408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048229627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102610877","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0034","title":"Gender equality, AI, and the future of human rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Principal (computer security); Order (exchange); Gender equality","score_opus":0.023860933616311364,"score_gpt":0.3286279204972078,"score_spread":0.30476698688089643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102610877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054747805,0.0017758687,0.00014433284,0.014320908,0.0003100005,0.00008522256,0.0000045999145,0.0000070143415,0.92860425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975414,0.00046328706,0.00007854632,0.00021751884,0.00013549304,5.8980545e-9,1.8955333e-7,9.3550443e-7,0.0015625914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923897,0.00028940348,0.00008977013,0.00005074253,0.0002270543,0.000104078594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939084,0.000084693376,0.00011507607,0.000065567394,0.0002795511,0.0000642861],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011597803,0.00004001592,0.00013592035,0.000010587527,0.0022934405,0.000042276326,0.000253145,0.00009649714,0.00028509964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016337599,0.000031358304,0.00008558352,0.000025413296,0.0011069416,0.00035228886,0.00005872665,0.00017621835,2.0269096e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003035183,0.000016598076,0.00021073206,0.000006212379,0.000052753545,0.0000013849212,0.032659177,3.0789408e-7,0.000012990137,0.96507305,0.0015495917,0.0003868509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018545734,0.000049107435,0.0049141822,0.000050061237,0.00011400351,9.930047e-7,0.07937012,0.0000039023093,0.000026163278,0.55300665,0.3605133,0.00009697568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25219834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6472941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9427936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009247137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009604558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102648418","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0039","title":"Denise Réaume and the Women’s Court of Canada: Feminist judgment projects and rewriting <i>Pierson v Post</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Scholarship; Supreme court; Rewriting; Legal history; Conciliation; Perspective (graphical); Common law; Legal formalism","score_opus":0.0049925668961238135,"score_gpt":0.2008647706149532,"score_spread":0.19587220371882938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102648418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51184064,0.005037044,0.000024703531,0.017418522,0.00029181252,0.00029242254,0.000030296185,0.000011090874,0.4650535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954437,0.0012951696,0.0001714912,0.00041257846,0.000037462607,1.0610077e-7,2.3310895e-7,0.000001403661,0.0026378485],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933356,0.00011291215,0.00008760208,0.000074723415,0.00023337199,0.00015782357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949634,0.00008065597,0.00015576273,0.000050031107,0.0001334708,0.00008372561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006370857,0.00005177202,0.00014026581,0.0000021554642,0.0015170185,0.00002965851,0.00016215563,0.000053786356,0.00007637728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043901928,0.000042188345,0.00003912777,0.00002811033,0.0007466077,0.00014289364,0.000057986294,0.00011004422,2.7438311e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004684843,0.000063770014,0.0031741138,0.00011462331,0.00029353073,0.00003027462,0.53553146,0.0000036924073,0.0001785403,0.42440498,0.03328509,0.0024514322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012099774,0.000035708665,0.00076435483,0.000093523035,0.00005261988,0.0000068411337,0.7530286,0.0000065028557,0.00003299821,0.0004349633,0.2442677,0.00006623349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78594697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9479573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4836031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051369297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048756506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102652650","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0041","title":"Richard Charles Bosworth (Dick) Risk: Maker of Canadian legal history","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Compensation (psychology); Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.007257814264269505,"score_gpt":0.1821882469109997,"score_spread":0.1749304326467302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102652650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020487493,0.007397101,0.000036740614,0.00093595375,0.0010746351,0.000069093905,0.00006135081,0.00001072115,0.9699269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.843969,0.011509956,0.00044650366,0.0002479747,0.00023099294,6.400852e-8,0.000003229706,0.000008211938,0.14358407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921554,0.00012396395,0.00012198075,0.00009497054,0.00022488128,0.00021868398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920267,0.000022129683,0.00017761621,0.00010796843,0.00017837244,0.00031123808],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037375756,0.000055532015,0.000162786,0.0003809535,0.0014082841,0.000034193854,0.000337386,0.00009108424,0.0068305414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003505936,0.00008359473,0.00014468085,0.000088690154,0.0008303376,0.0004419122,0.000021386379,0.00016667724,0.000009091362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059823153,0.000056476645,0.004143988,0.000026431677,0.00017597995,0.00013062177,0.034430303,0.000008513921,0.000029210465,0.33200377,0.61981183,0.009123052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022686424,0.000015731006,0.008869756,0.000031408264,0.0000611748,0.0000016322712,0.0073408275,0.000001671716,0.0000012102726,0.000116026116,0.98326343,0.00007023985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99970824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8263428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065583014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032175712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102654051","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0033","title":"The law’s own terms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Perspective (graphical); Liability; Framing (construction); Property (philosophy); Economic Justice; Relation (database)","score_opus":0.008273622615102337,"score_gpt":0.25890349847135896,"score_spread":0.2506298758562566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102654051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002268795,0.0002467298,0.00035140337,0.0070859357,0.00013924442,0.000046717807,0.0000026056657,0.000009816745,0.98984873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98123455,0.0005356758,0.00025187273,0.00013033554,0.000072559786,3.399644e-8,1.9878962e-7,0.0000010037675,0.01777376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962294,0.000050964947,0.000054685464,0.000045389956,0.000118883225,0.00010715625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968266,0.000054513184,0.000057205245,0.000085467975,0.00006761978,0.000052521315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026758306,0.000026876858,0.000046634126,0.0000033044153,0.0030856915,0.000056094872,0.00036727835,0.0000290367,0.0002983062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009164161,0.000021762353,0.000059835602,0.000021928057,0.00036403336,0.0002088007,0.00005110745,0.00007393742,0.00000560339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063667862,0.0000116184065,0.00009821673,6.734112e-7,0.0000141380715,0.000001113294,0.0019454991,0.0000019025312,0.000018677873,0.9905591,0.0039676772,0.0033750387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112304,0.00000589969,0.0007500031,0.0000076145493,0.0000115929015,4.527916e-7,0.010126685,0.000005320659,0.000010788539,0.006217159,0.98272747,0.000024722034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18064378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6559369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018338786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007166088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102689192","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0043","title":"A pragmatist approach to the administrative state: A new interpretation of John Willis’s ‘three approaches to administrative law’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Opposition (politics); Interpretation (philosophy); Administrative law; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Constitutional interpretation","score_opus":0.07232671953910134,"score_gpt":0.28953992751324215,"score_spread":0.2172132079741408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102689192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01671521,0.0001671482,0.0486996,0.0028289184,0.00020381129,0.0006872866,0.000042508633,0.000020052741,0.93063545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98567754,0.000016237595,0.007690638,0.00013078145,0.00007276181,4.800181e-7,0.0000026295224,0.0000041964263,0.006404733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876344,0.0002474509,0.00022485234,0.00018821385,0.00036729858,0.00020872094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908096,0.00010339526,0.00023104556,0.00016489728,0.00017895007,0.00024077845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004919049,0.0001203217,0.00024796708,0.00004188201,0.0009793757,0.00009478497,0.00062269735,0.00006420006,0.000277896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003683064,0.00010114958,0.00011866836,0.00010625241,0.00047483505,0.00048218697,0.00007838154,0.00015714909,0.0000057117086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003088887,0.00012561874,0.00004233184,0.000015723399,0.000115444134,0.0000039784845,0.15930328,0.00009303437,0.000006454547,0.83221567,0.004773037,0.0029965611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025632924,0.0019463808,0.010636248,0.0006356522,0.00041065252,0.000018646995,0.48170614,0.0007739862,0.00043171798,0.06321022,0.43687013,0.00079694117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04276478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7395637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003026185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005941202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9636095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102692710","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0040","title":"Multidisciplinary Marty Friedland, miscarriages of justice, and the modern law school","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Multidisciplinary approach; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Social injustice; Focus (optics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.014064567837728262,"score_gpt":0.30338030359581064,"score_spread":0.2893157357580824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102692710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062619704,0.00052146334,0.0004396758,0.014747406,0.0002195077,0.000078266625,0.0000043680557,0.000006313113,0.97772104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758871,0.0003640587,0.0010868312,0.00012976391,0.000053973334,5.27455e-8,4.3952224e-7,0.0000018699438,0.022475904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949604,0.00016736006,0.00008982824,0.000052611285,0.00012371523,0.00007044798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993723,0.00019409877,0.00013887387,0.00007411774,0.0001662769,0.00005433233],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005112814,0.00003503282,0.0000853735,0.000015259928,0.0010640279,0.00003845275,0.00016460333,0.00003922038,0.0013752631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118422286,0.000029057706,0.000038025657,0.000045508787,0.00060565904,0.0005112294,0.00004351409,0.00014436644,0.0000019864253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120467084,0.000042476207,0.0005392402,0.000012542431,0.00004724074,0.0000011539177,0.016760807,0.0000076963515,0.00003862625,0.97595876,0.00575812,0.0007128521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024976416,0.000029397974,0.0064339642,0.00007773563,0.00037707872,0.000004511614,0.15128954,0.0001792402,0.000026890855,0.028190456,0.8107873,0.000106217274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14396837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23580097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022275902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102710797","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0044","title":"Some leading themes in the contract scholarship of Stephen Waddams","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Certainty; Equity (law)","score_opus":0.023318244356577686,"score_gpt":0.29635687343484957,"score_spread":0.27303862907827187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102710797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40182313,0.0019933202,0.00018066337,0.0058423085,0.00012160002,0.00019619401,0.000009012471,0.000009720166,0.589824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986184,0.00032304518,0.00017010505,0.00008117602,0.000046093213,4.0362895e-8,2.2863786e-7,9.062752e-7,0.00076000206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994618,0.00013264336,0.00008974693,0.000049443912,0.00016281717,0.00010350173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961203,0.000117468066,0.00009573021,0.00007955474,0.000066676876,0.000028551869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065374037,0.0000318365,0.00008896611,0.000013586325,0.0005254186,0.00002747781,0.00044740958,0.000037253056,0.00016196682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003205553,0.000026949956,0.00006279331,0.00004367564,0.00018511419,0.00049900275,0.000030156656,0.00013037892,0.0000015598177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014889686,0.000049922408,0.003540123,0.0000037578818,0.000017957678,0.0000023504647,0.012752092,0.000011906122,0.00021073023,0.98125863,0.00021368451,0.0019239718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014253871,0.00006000067,0.08941894,0.0001975128,0.00008834765,0.0000025952254,0.15765828,0.00003753706,0.0002496535,0.037019726,0.7136817,0.00016032984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068617165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20408905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9442389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001521417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009736661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.937585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102741097","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0064","title":"On living federal lives: Katherine Swinton’s <i>The Supreme Court and Canadian Federalism</i> and the future of federal imagination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Disenchantment; Originalism; Legitimacy; Constitutional law; Politics; Economic Justice; Principle of legality","score_opus":0.004502356691243037,"score_gpt":0.21590702195478098,"score_spread":0.21140466526353793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102741097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38102683,0.0071354727,0.000277415,0.08801595,0.0008415191,0.00042528656,0.00004368458,0.000015323641,0.5222185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99628556,0.0006287519,0.000047274963,0.00046947275,0.00013430881,6.937338e-8,1.8640972e-7,0.0000019702159,0.002432417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992494,0.00020218686,0.000096719115,0.0000799865,0.00019265886,0.00017907945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994068,0.00018301616,0.00010467092,0.00006456321,0.00012129822,0.00011965555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005713591,0.00006206667,0.00013785496,0.000010525318,0.001842852,0.00012036685,0.00018578574,0.000042968524,0.00009833212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005604828,0.00004412503,0.00005087918,0.000023029517,0.0005431111,0.00027089362,0.00003552898,0.000119654505,2.5311738e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004244224,0.000012018794,0.002039984,0.000010525647,0.000035698977,0.000003818577,0.012655078,0.0000019078536,0.000009143836,0.9806932,0.0032469763,0.001249188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022288968,0.00012303554,0.122081116,0.00046399253,0.00006822058,0.000024328307,0.08124602,0.0002543876,0.000009647939,0.022415683,0.77085835,0.00022630813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9528697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98461777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9582775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031419133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017029014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102758668","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0035","title":"A rule-of-law compliant reading of section 33: The continuing relevance of Lorraine Weinrib’s public law scholarship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Section (typography); Legislature; Scholarship; Rule of law; Public law; Legislation","score_opus":0.028029359702664902,"score_gpt":0.26856022067914115,"score_spread":0.24053086097647625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102758668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21984848,0.0026259623,0.0010650291,0.0023424858,0.00062927994,0.00015629451,0.000029168385,0.000015114169,0.7732882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889064,0.00048899656,0.00027836728,0.00003697186,0.000073083684,4.920537e-8,4.971018e-7,0.0000013544195,0.00023006009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909997,0.00016170564,0.00020410267,0.00008151161,0.000309635,0.00014309623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988266,0.00017406172,0.00033846888,0.00007569169,0.0005418314,0.000043331253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008052696,0.000059413367,0.00022100544,0.000020599979,0.000995445,0.000017004082,0.0003047305,0.000053264925,0.00008743765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012598604,0.000053801974,0.00012396481,0.00008579506,0.0016046193,0.0005084186,0.00008033485,0.00014588522,4.4156909e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065421365,0.000042129646,0.0019164905,0.000014814146,0.000095456686,0.0000020658172,0.0044271257,0.000011478811,0.0009563541,0.9912905,0.00006997499,0.0011081496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002562346,0.00029932667,0.03640012,0.0024729052,0.00041353778,0.000016519283,0.106771395,0.000047808957,0.0019255854,0.09567669,0.7530356,0.00037817188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21423785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35019234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89561385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022268268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010646407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7909946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102759388","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0052","title":"Transforming spousal support from the ground up: Carol Rogerson and the development of the spousal support advisory guidelines","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Negotiation; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Exaggeration; Set (abstract data type); Advisory committee","score_opus":0.0265818875826978,"score_gpt":0.27782091103299517,"score_spread":0.25123902345029736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102759388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192892,0.0021141365,0.0003059482,0.01756651,0.0010333218,0.000589739,0.00003266189,0.00002183902,0.059046656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957352,0.00057126593,0.0006941776,0.00021712888,0.00012159569,2.5879837e-7,0.000001367174,0.0000034464708,0.0026555147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986554,0.00023979993,0.00028988972,0.00012249136,0.00047276195,0.00021965975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907404,0.00024998552,0.00022754929,0.000106411186,0.00028314095,0.000058874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011670323,0.00011548512,0.00024576197,0.0000071008453,0.003188158,0.00004339571,0.00061541266,0.0000752487,0.0003369162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009032468,0.000062131556,0.00017462698,0.00004983267,0.0011878704,0.00034626326,0.00013942654,0.00018215974,8.5381004e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073304353,0.00008555739,0.023908693,0.00003340216,0.0011333252,0.000012385848,0.87618333,0.000016717717,0.0004418122,0.041344397,0.015553751,0.040553566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020178985,0.000026763937,0.037153203,0.00009263975,0.00026168922,0.0000039204247,0.4741085,0.000011162585,0.0001995612,0.00035188437,0.4856249,0.00014787425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17515185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5089234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47007117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035229386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033637142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102811689","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0046","title":"Individual freedom and the supremacy of law: Alan Brudner on criminal justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminal law; Hegelianism; Subject (documents); Politics; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.021949593535058234,"score_gpt":0.23545805812761478,"score_spread":0.21350846459255654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102811689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43895012,0.00071459205,0.00034730718,0.0014043489,0.00078250637,0.00016131393,0.00005727543,0.000017371545,0.55756515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981276,0.0002542483,0.00020426352,0.00037623572,0.000049827428,2.2827752e-8,3.262984e-7,0.0000024923054,0.0009849984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992376,0.0001453688,0.00012212784,0.00012520162,0.00024063523,0.0001290865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939686,0.00023381197,0.00012490223,0.00013446715,0.00005181509,0.000058122754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022056678,0.00007756629,0.00015413555,0.00002045252,0.00050605746,0.00002424454,0.00041713894,0.00003815168,0.00025663013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007169457,0.000058084188,0.00007993415,0.000026949096,0.0007599972,0.00025334585,0.0001312514,0.00015995809,0.0000016471677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057321746,0.00011549634,0.00011396436,0.000057413003,0.00003497648,0.000044196524,0.004041286,0.00005330474,0.004727444,0.9862581,0.0023017328,0.0016788659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07362596,0.004534492,0.08526426,0.0027403224,0.010809857,0.0012972996,0.08315095,0.0042212093,0.10951527,0.048753373,0.57366025,0.002426771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013521973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008305432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003850331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032731812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99304706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102812399","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0051","title":"Professor Alan Mewett on morality and the criminal law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Morality; Public morality; Foundation (evidence); Public law; Criminal procedure; Focus (optics); Comparative law","score_opus":0.02755648655297038,"score_gpt":0.33728179897787536,"score_spread":0.309725312424905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102812399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014379537,0.00010516522,0.00008273348,0.1265223,0.0003572808,0.00008714883,0.0000024410826,0.000008012516,0.85845536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906154,0.000101770886,0.0002512026,0.0014681024,0.00006508404,6.336883e-8,4.7229267e-7,9.1016767e-7,0.00749697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933016,0.00030615568,0.0000729953,0.000055222114,0.0001528207,0.000082624385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940944,0.00019291186,0.00010355529,0.00007163681,0.00017934163,0.000043146356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008444554,0.00003439982,0.00007120571,0.000010424519,0.0017743978,0.000073198506,0.00017084541,0.000036126956,0.00066571287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009830583,0.000028142133,0.000033993154,0.000041660383,0.0006228801,0.0005498689,0.000023383813,0.00021888052,0.000002169332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011391191,0.000038210797,0.000099224504,0.0000033033054,0.000022206103,0.0000010211446,0.018458826,6.066917e-7,0.0000024098802,0.97485185,0.0055735963,0.0008348299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068014616,0.000019535142,0.0021600157,0.000021622081,0.00006035879,0.0000016033414,0.08016949,0.000004310266,0.000011823553,0.008010385,0.90882,0.00004074656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27942252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35164815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97623587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014089716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022911179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102830595","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0037","title":"‘More legal theory than I thought’: Robert Sharpe and legal scholarship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal realism; Legal formalism; Normative; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Scholarship; Habeas corpus; Legal profession; Legal opinion","score_opus":0.008113778256324878,"score_gpt":0.25199561264418585,"score_spread":0.24388183438786099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102830595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08978083,0.0060246065,0.0002522631,0.005426299,0.0005447103,0.000118194694,0.00001272684,0.00004540953,0.89779496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94627213,0.001873601,0.0009882719,0.00043107072,0.000230228,4.6769095e-8,0.0000014518128,0.000004192936,0.050198995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901396,0.00026058496,0.00009202387,0.0001358606,0.00027852162,0.00021905005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999449,0.00006233998,0.00009078166,0.000098186,0.0001584256,0.00014123846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080997654,0.00008704566,0.00015015031,0.0000050835297,0.0021648253,0.00014344617,0.00040754,0.00016423922,0.0008081622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045782002,0.00008534023,0.0001469837,0.000054975408,0.0006734863,0.0014355439,0.00009264832,0.00030719882,0.0000022361141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009203049,0.000037975777,0.001125216,0.000009099595,0.00008833694,0.000037813268,0.011397015,0.0000014559316,0.000063712985,0.9812779,0.0039546085,0.0019148568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051769306,0.000033956796,0.005250937,0.00008363937,0.00007894282,0.000016884036,0.07977061,0.0000020937682,0.000034069166,0.005546023,0.9085462,0.00011895619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025436088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13479698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97573185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026029034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017047646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104003265","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0095","title":"Old habits die hard: Precedent, psychology, and the admissibility of forensic evidence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Scientific evidence; Scrutiny; Cognitive bias; Harm; Acknowledgement; Deference; Rigour; Cognition; Delusion","score_opus":0.03903203113210236,"score_gpt":0.34721307698462583,"score_spread":0.3081810458525235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104003265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5639794,0.033035383,0.0030637772,0.018596914,0.0013990169,0.00062752183,0.000015747715,0.00004871934,0.3792335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99110246,0.004526988,0.0017914535,0.00014130889,0.000028522096,4.548649e-8,5.6956928e-8,0.0000016618428,0.0024075056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989761,0.00031340084,0.00016213756,0.00013882332,0.00027772004,0.00013182517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985243,0.0006575869,0.00022912658,0.00017667883,0.00033593643,0.00007639119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015823388,0.000058989117,0.00019132688,0.000020565689,0.0007041529,0.000029214501,0.0005256302,0.000068394205,0.00033781875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009813085,0.00004768964,0.000087375796,0.000057550307,0.0014424798,0.00048814417,0.00011734033,0.0001218168,8.838746e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004426992,0.00035651738,0.06080551,0.00023345876,0.00044051587,0.000032306998,0.059686124,0.000024476927,0.00037134037,0.51700544,0.030486792,0.3261305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058891494,0.00033009655,0.4855649,0.0018399413,0.00047854648,0.00002111509,0.034888092,0.000045610286,0.00038576484,0.1385633,0.33162296,0.00037051152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020247044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17870113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42712304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009989787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016329515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104057871","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0014","title":"Employer reputation and the right of workers to a private life in dismissal cases: Finding the balance in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Balance (ability); Unfair dismissal; Reputation; Test (biology); Work–life balance; Expansive; Industrial relations","score_opus":0.0059602205558194855,"score_gpt":0.21293552317215506,"score_spread":0.20697530261633557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104057871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93848747,0.00014612376,0.00021708077,0.0042897966,0.00007040209,0.00012452912,0.0000028004981,0.0000012395238,0.056660566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996762,0.00008093227,0.000045414326,0.00009295237,0.000005435307,7.196524e-8,2.1720999e-7,5.116863e-7,0.00009823148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961936,0.000081984195,0.00010624673,0.000036971225,0.000081197984,0.00007423598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970937,0.00014329467,0.0000649865,0.000031419237,0.000020382873,0.000030560503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040795023,0.000025879586,0.00007717813,0.000013453777,0.00022790402,0.000020128144,0.00012221311,0.0000143166135,0.000032095442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004193178,0.000019424508,0.000017299057,0.000061582374,0.000112199596,0.0003905664,0.000013808033,0.000053518062,7.809631e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010009775,0.000044917426,0.38336125,0.000033856497,0.00007847546,0.000039172864,0.09951437,0.0037333732,0.0000020862515,0.49250203,0.0014359477,0.018253563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004716691,0.000059437323,0.55775887,0.0008817028,0.00005133098,0.0000059112294,0.29648215,0.0008426576,0.00002148039,0.006619652,0.1323259,0.00023424436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95729464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99818134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48588237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003741774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003052146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17528765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165112071","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0024","title":"Theology in <i>Vincent v Lake Erie</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Relevance (law); Damages; Property (philosophy); Private property; Economic Justice; Natural law; Property rights; Obligation; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.00755479912293219,"score_gpt":0.25438042034466074,"score_spread":0.24682562122172855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165112071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017168637,0.00024215813,0.0007164883,0.004082479,0.00012411196,0.000060336974,0.000009410863,0.000008709391,0.97758764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954158,0.0005281268,0.00044788118,0.00014092855,0.00003332387,3.7681488e-8,6.4295756e-7,8.9586325e-7,0.0034323772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961644,0.00007066674,0.00006556115,0.000055978348,0.00007995096,0.00011141832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976456,0.00003162445,0.000049036524,0.00005924882,0.00005076199,0.00004477234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023907602,0.000027715845,0.000071096176,0.000010480776,0.00045045777,0.000011287595,0.00023875419,0.000041505147,0.0016622542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000101938385,0.00003075195,0.00004070096,0.00003663662,0.00021207426,0.00017527994,0.000047848633,0.00008117259,0.000003898116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013216859,0.000035994915,0.0019394029,0.0000013089928,0.0000071614177,0.0000046241685,0.0024410132,0.000011243041,0.000014301343,0.9920816,0.0012370008,0.0022131442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022643241,0.0000072256266,0.0052580377,0.000011480722,0.000006186821,5.7859023e-7,0.0058066854,0.0000075309727,0.000005223613,0.004727224,0.9839145,0.000028878865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08616842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94652396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98735434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002899452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001205492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165185624","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0103","title":"Beyond economic allegiance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Jurisdiction; Nexus (standard); Equity (law); Normative; Politics","score_opus":0.0063011530924254175,"score_gpt":0.18222871426504625,"score_spread":0.17592756117262084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165185624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038071927,0.0002957765,0.0011010851,0.0013339121,0.0005728086,0.000043721913,0.0000016215793,0.000023022725,0.9585561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929083,0.00008364465,0.00038162174,0.0006675687,0.0002461789,1.763996e-8,0.000001837243,0.0000029138123,0.005707891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996953,0.000004445832,0.000084498955,0.00007602089,0.000055312834,0.000084407875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961406,0.000007715269,0.00021570928,0.00007928852,0.00007485372,0.000008351889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010356844,0.000052816325,0.000092720875,0.000027275222,0.00027810654,0.00005736405,0.00020422258,0.000024833958,0.0024739252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000045461766,0.00006108519,0.000059642138,0.000023146891,0.000053907046,0.0011275712,0.000066211185,0.00005808727,0.00007444699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007152798,0.000034202738,0.003842498,0.00003036722,0.000042301308,0.000014420881,0.00005715294,0.00018833115,0.00018579415,0.9357614,0.051999163,0.007772872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006577047,0.000004158374,0.008949917,0.000037049445,0.000027166585,0.0000017994956,0.0009053342,0.00072610733,0.000020252175,0.0057095354,0.9828731,0.00008790751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125871925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048893034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001159225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027740316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165203122","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0005","title":"Is law an intellectual practice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029475989745648953,"score_gpt":0.3601314257086606,"score_spread":0.3306554359630116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165203122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016356212,0.0001380043,0.0008041663,0.040748347,0.00047889276,0.0000430685,0.000002469072,0.000014920575,0.9561345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97505134,0.0004040689,0.004205581,0.0042426344,0.00015756114,3.178497e-8,0.0000015112171,0.000002496297,0.01593479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992891,0.0002407623,0.000094313604,0.000074196636,0.00019116217,0.0001104503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988408,0.00030285658,0.00013219944,0.00009342999,0.0005425927,0.00008811449],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006365205,0.00004008146,0.000068093555,0.0000228696,0.0015817285,0.00011685671,0.00025741855,0.000058504662,0.008939715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042070323,0.00004752802,0.000043851647,0.000094067276,0.00027473856,0.0031586315,0.000024069417,0.00024831967,0.000021818005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044807235,0.00011941612,0.000031070405,0.0000014669905,0.000038709994,0.0000027340564,0.071062654,0.0000010092283,0.000016043015,0.8896283,0.0365811,0.0024726975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014665921,0.000028682589,0.000060835733,0.000008791498,0.00003206086,0.0000033162084,0.14110063,0.00000557942,0.000019931022,0.0014920702,0.85706085,0.00004059008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4118523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41031766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97341573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031958576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066575524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165206146","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0006","title":"The demise of parliamentary divorce in Ontario: The 1930 <i>Divorce Act</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Demise; Parliament; Legislature; Institution; Federal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.006058721604103293,"score_gpt":0.1946975838619056,"score_spread":0.18863886225780233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165206146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16105759,0.0045690015,0.000039688854,0.006402983,0.0010059314,0.00018857917,0.000009593123,0.00000847173,0.82671815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453538,0.0026749487,0.00006875374,0.00033689965,0.00005531662,9.3292556e-8,5.6891935e-7,0.000002774941,0.05150686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992976,0.00014055218,0.00011849462,0.00006484949,0.00022082317,0.000157658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994947,0.00012473654,0.00012467463,0.00011724499,0.00007070331,0.00006795028],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005785865,0.000041875308,0.00010087725,0.000030476293,0.0021900125,0.00007249374,0.0005645731,0.000046356352,0.0009809856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024379091,0.00003948807,0.000097562144,0.000050991162,0.00097202696,0.00030521504,0.000058921207,0.00020042103,0.0000018275314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057213765,0.0002747331,0.06268595,0.000037589176,0.00039318562,0.000109347304,0.3298175,0.00013204168,0.00016081767,0.35555062,0.21971783,0.030548243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471211,0.0000119748465,0.015424798,0.00003792147,0.000029403427,8.246027e-7,0.033151414,0.000001607772,0.0000027723215,0.00041995358,0.9506345,0.000037699836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99904275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7842962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025041758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092717155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}