{"meta":{"query_hash":"0815512d230a","filters":{"venue":"Utah Environmental Law Review"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0815512d230a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Utah+Environmental+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1535564555","doi":"","title":"THE TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY DEBATE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utah Environmental Law Review","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Pipeline (software); Opposition (politics); Politics; Keystone species; Law; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.0053816876499834165,"score_gpt":0.1881168670091417,"score_spread":0.18273517935915828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535564555","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028235199,0.046466615,0.00061206747,0.47560775,0.0034798859,0.000040201372,0.00017719899,0.00008297538,0.44529808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35654926,0.030298129,0.0007988822,0.29037273,0.0026019907,0.0001321682,0.00017972286,0.00011096389,0.31895608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966343,0.0006264272,0.00012587226,0.00047169454,0.0013077249,0.0008340475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967481,0.0017233785,0.00013981675,0.00015198678,0.00094740675,0.00028935607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039777295,0.00032915143,0.00029483228,0.0012083241,0.013108743,0.0109699555,0.0019460078,0.012588006,0.008109859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075172163,0.00046181097,0.0003651941,0.0012278109,0.009152448,0.0066161826,0.003789295,0.0101248855,0.0012199467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000217854,0.00003980595,0.0013091173,0.00017039347,0.000015458108,0.0005492632,0.0025654153,0.00020922249,0.000364798,0.59582037,0.37618202,0.022752438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101363485,0.000020903271,0.0018716523,0.00018491819,0.000016489423,0.000120366094,0.0023870475,0.00009739487,0.00026661405,0.016716564,0.97827566,0.000032276228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.129736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17215835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.870264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012025568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02154732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2579617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}