{"meta":{"query_hash":"48af24b5c4b5","filters":{"venue":"Utilitas"},"cohort_total":54,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":54,"exported":54,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48af24b5c4b5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Utilitas"},"results":[{"id":"W1977216584","doi":"10.1017/s095382081000004x","title":"Mill on the Harm in Not Voting","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Harm; Duty; Voting; Obligation; Morality; Harm principle; Law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Moral obligation; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04658484643245275,"score_gpt":0.34700163341908685,"score_spread":0.3004167869866341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977216584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6617319,0.000005153827,0.0000014338245,0.0039875046,0.000178235,0.000054807264,0.0000026856937,0.000016860948,0.33402145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625266,0.0000012889285,0.000023450057,0.0028819966,0.00013083589,0.0000047777244,1.3814169e-7,0.0000021589963,0.0007027222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930143,0.0001450396,0.00008038292,0.000094057876,0.00013392934,0.0002451752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899626,0.00079972943,0.000012396198,0.00011704327,0.000015345584,0.000059246846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001363373,0.00003884794,0.00004617641,0.000015586682,0.0002279462,0.000022901118,0.00021742744,0.000048037055,0.0008201763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027003835,0.00002617362,0.00002560288,0.0001007351,0.0003728622,0.00006824789,0.000029560046,0.00024577946,0.0003236442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043479577,0.000012731592,0.0008153248,6.5879624e-7,6.7192343e-7,9.7941e-7,0.0023383352,3.0056285e-7,0.00044009075,0.99432385,0.00015866096,0.0019040608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020289674,0.000047106423,0.069636516,0.000040309136,0.0000044407225,5.696305e-7,0.0054974016,0.0001352269,0.007248157,0.49673635,0.42022076,0.00023026521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005239472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005347788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49758747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001542485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003334443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8980356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990365400","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808003166","title":"Nozick, Ramsey, and Symbolic Utility","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Rationality; Mathematical economics; Normative; Value (mathematics); Decision theory; The Symbolic; Economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.08805860237501995,"score_gpt":0.20843380836933137,"score_spread":0.12037520599431142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990365400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5111752,0.001134042,0.000003241746,0.00044750614,0.00031023,0.00006400084,0.000020129704,0.00007488293,0.48677078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940319,0.00004300064,0.000035215453,0.00041389483,0.000245576,0.0000041945377,0.000002279081,0.000004885839,0.0052190693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999331,0.000020468344,0.000118783,0.0002140254,0.00014040775,0.00017534396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999629,0.000033307675,0.00002501782,0.00018514413,0.000038195547,0.00008931819],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012239619,0.00009057616,0.000118467644,0.00004694916,0.00076981966,0.000028737359,0.00012800736,0.000023822551,0.0019096994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002478773,0.000079943224,0.000040636878,0.000022397107,0.001576417,0.00023726835,0.000039462,0.000089437024,0.00020807477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036005855,0.00015860125,0.002194409,0.000042309814,0.000018402734,0.000032561864,0.07833088,1.7370223e-7,0.000094184,0.87575585,0.036633804,0.0067028287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016641762,0.00007027915,0.012153498,0.000007959755,0.00000746391,0.000020330772,0.00075351144,0.000077434015,0.000024804143,0.018014362,0.9685553,0.00014866564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019317743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011667014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9319215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012354539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026596881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992103826","doi":"10.1017/s0953820812000374","title":"Playing Dice with Morality: Weighted Lotteries and the Number Problem","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Lottery; Dice; Morality; Outcome (game theory); Action (physics); Economics; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.028476265113334016,"score_gpt":0.22992297309469634,"score_spread":0.20144670798136233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992103826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74625075,0.00040039103,0.000025512383,0.006917699,0.00017896561,0.00042811048,0.000016961105,0.00008342037,0.24569817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99033844,0.000021255752,0.00034238363,0.0012713078,0.00020293587,0.000071117516,0.000007797397,0.000014735035,0.0077300505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992325,0.00011895767,0.00015805237,0.00017039267,0.00012502105,0.00019510713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993361,0.00023492523,0.00006271427,0.00021035799,0.000114742164,0.00004113917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026864707,0.00012662982,0.00019565258,0.000013944473,0.00047154716,0.00019122289,0.000098490025,0.000039810824,0.0009540141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000151699915,0.00006670435,0.000037135258,0.000019686751,0.0018671326,0.00025236123,0.00004618963,0.0001919577,0.00015699095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045422275,0.000025058387,0.0037799943,0.000085273525,0.00008265731,0.0000016610223,0.05306634,8.731355e-8,0.0000071363097,0.93897325,0.0030508137,0.0008822887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030320196,0.00016050407,0.012747454,0.00016374848,0.0002706937,0.000033887864,0.03724096,0.0003022389,0.0000802502,0.42416397,0.52116185,0.0006423955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028551132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007315739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51811105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006490108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017572562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992982628","doi":"10.1017/s0953820807002877","title":"Beccaria's Luxury of Comfort and Happiness of the Greatest Number","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Luxury goods; Sociology; Distributive property; Section (typography); Class (philosophy); Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Advertising; Social psychology; Philosophy; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12095805951271647,"score_gpt":0.20842195882817086,"score_spread":0.08746389931545438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992982628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90546554,0.000082466024,0.000011501404,0.00013886348,0.00017048533,0.000117038784,0.000004151846,0.000012993836,0.09399696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781424,0.000010771089,0.000017485881,0.00026815318,0.00008988939,0.000002487926,0.0000046366504,0.000008002739,0.0017843281],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994686,0.0000073799893,0.00017983149,0.00010298865,0.00013399462,0.0001071877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995995,0.000028604252,0.00008740878,0.00017151477,0.0001082814,0.000004683498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108066655,0.00008162477,0.00014219011,0.000031075768,0.00011048743,0.0000091252305,0.00014844415,0.00004084306,0.0005783138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008662149,0.00005045778,0.000052732,0.0001942665,0.00020563857,0.00017934815,0.0001374657,0.000062899555,0.000060916238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000124734,0.00015874591,0.9682534,0.00043843285,0.00007526457,0.0000054219295,0.0005869833,0.000010492807,0.00091494573,0.0075308396,0.019601846,0.0022989092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001338449,0.00003410166,0.8151783,0.0002818306,0.00015884564,0.00004236959,0.00044933803,0.00382512,0.0049325144,0.0043457034,0.16901776,0.00039568395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012622022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003274778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1530751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000033789104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010445368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63321304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003018970","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808003208","title":"Benefit versus Numbers versus Helping the Worst-off: An Alternative to the Prevalent Approach to the Just Distribution of Resources","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"sort; Metric (unit); Distribution (mathematics); Aggregate (composite); Characterization (materials science); Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Operations management","score_opus":0.1623778619965742,"score_gpt":0.3084663210537725,"score_spread":0.14608845905719828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003018970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93281776,0.0011279136,0.00016801641,0.005578589,0.0026554575,0.000927647,0.00041376098,0.000052633022,0.056258224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603415,0.00007582438,0.000032552016,0.00035652466,0.0010467223,0.000069154994,0.000056642803,0.00001531469,0.0023131236],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855286,0.0002536038,0.00025857575,0.0002812127,0.00036375158,0.0002900106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843657,0.00056358817,0.0001134237,0.00062064215,0.00018978637,0.0000759853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074283394,0.00017090591,0.00019010334,0.000025595533,0.0010324869,0.00005714419,0.00062314933,0.000049143007,0.00005706138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020116963,0.00008207619,0.00013398635,0.00008741981,0.0006995247,0.00010464418,0.00013652805,0.00028494722,0.00004969458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011244067,0.00022046857,0.000084248575,0.00004901149,0.0002975191,0.0000014791846,0.58330643,0.0017171777,0.00000547858,0.39548483,0.011823836,0.0058850977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008516189,0.00060537196,0.003100295,0.00004504199,0.00019129003,0.000002613726,0.123346135,0.0005103645,0.00014183113,0.0010609581,0.86989367,0.00025083288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014756195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003464425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85806984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006884739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029781439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79411584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008321645","doi":"10.1017/s0953820804001426","title":"Teleological Egalitarianism vs. the Slogan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Egalitarianism; Teleology; Virtue; Autonomy; Individualism; Epistemology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0670312286759142,"score_gpt":0.35284510459083585,"score_spread":0.28581387591492163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008321645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02253739,0.0001977406,0.000051845123,0.24177225,0.00022146752,0.00011292423,0.0000070399983,0.0001056493,0.7349937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873796,0.000015623174,0.00025896914,0.008687532,0.0011467477,0.0000060303905,0.0000012675567,0.0000035416645,0.0025006589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998748,0.0003003755,0.00012795061,0.00014682332,0.0002862617,0.00039058353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904734,0.0005555656,0.000016813094,0.00019461368,0.000041077103,0.00014456795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011117836,0.000068336616,0.00008700145,0.000013017784,0.00070888945,0.000034954097,0.0003428192,0.00016440656,0.0010771017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011174121,0.000043810996,0.00007275824,0.00010819578,0.0011559193,0.00010528591,0.000050443694,0.00031536134,0.00076142093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056313384,0.00002804544,0.00014709722,0.0000010146578,0.000004673471,0.0000016701242,0.0045782696,0.0000010671807,0.0000025910526,0.9884517,0.0049011526,0.0018770822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048800703,0.000017500568,0.0024396528,0.0000016279116,0.0000057245225,5.7214197e-7,0.00067454734,0.000013917295,0.0000135769915,0.39799744,0.598737,0.000049645914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008981429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078365917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96484226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055629134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095273834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010820112","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000211","title":"Varouxakis Georgios Liberty Abroad: J. S. Mill on International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 278.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.014160944329353593,"score_gpt":0.27697239383707295,"score_spread":0.26281144950771934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010820112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05075967,0.00006200103,0.0003370153,0.003663946,0.0006093952,0.00016512784,0.0001398316,0.00013926862,0.94412374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8741743,0.000107662025,0.00015827181,0.0008311279,0.00031524472,0.0000026425184,0.000021328735,0.000008752404,0.12438067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998354,0.00042657088,0.00017008348,0.00030318066,0.00035691477,0.0003892581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987138,0.00057712395,0.00006230547,0.00029400835,0.00011243869,0.00024031258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065984775,0.00012360438,0.00013331103,0.000047194484,0.00053461484,0.00004906291,0.00050136517,0.00013437189,0.00060966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008846204,0.00012527195,0.00010232971,0.00014704056,0.0005064097,0.00045661468,0.00012203505,0.00022121871,0.00089249405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031502455,0.0000603953,0.0005945918,0.0000026071618,0.000018195296,0.0000026667933,0.00027766437,0.00001741189,0.000010850118,0.850886,0.14739758,0.00070055743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023911975,0.000040143037,0.016541509,0.000021135887,0.000016902477,7.147097e-7,0.0002297974,0.00039477216,0.00006287814,0.003807096,0.97849137,0.00015454223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004064086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054293334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84707886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018635788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008501302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020268946","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000089","title":"Sidgwick on Consequentialism and Deontology: A Critique","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Deontological ethics; Prima facie; Philosophy; Duty; Epistemology; Business ethics; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.06786874989644973,"score_gpt":0.5037389770587267,"score_spread":0.43587022716227697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020268946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21997759,0.0006010427,0.0034207213,0.11752619,0.0024236299,0.0007862435,0.000020117493,0.00028877222,0.6549557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954353,0.000061132756,0.0012228865,0.04253185,0.00028160674,0.000051015293,0.000004920383,0.000015867954,0.0014777473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945453,0.0042632506,0.00031623055,0.00028048785,0.00022247598,0.00037229803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98227614,0.016939173,0.00009073211,0.00036317817,0.00012788255,0.00020289267],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004965799,0.00010847286,0.00020316779,0.000049199352,0.0007271931,0.0000057895086,0.00012722424,0.00044627863,0.0009363033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03211765,0.000094455325,0.000025230947,0.0000566635,0.0004841451,0.00006897556,0.00008950666,0.0029017073,0.00075383607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007430854,0.000042763175,0.0031012488,0.00019572247,0.000016933245,0.000012937005,0.002523606,9.4848595e-8,0.00014045133,0.9439674,0.046659824,0.0032647015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010394802,0.00021308984,0.011176074,0.0002533252,0.000039740084,0.000012342857,0.0022923755,0.00023390057,0.000045992678,0.36647817,0.6180433,0.00017218564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005224873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044005975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7343754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004436584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015036223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020580741","doi":"10.1017/s0953820806002019","title":"Value and Friendship: A More Subtle View","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Teleology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Positive economics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Social science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017217681839704763,"score_gpt":0.217969278428342,"score_spread":0.20075159658863723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020580741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28095436,0.005998844,0.000004149662,0.0035640078,0.00028613285,0.0000862886,0.00005248391,0.000080225676,0.7089735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457186,0.00000983271,0.000031365023,0.00047316487,0.0004822227,0.000005386116,0.000014613615,0.000007134409,0.0044044442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999549,0.00002893018,0.00010206761,0.00013225959,0.000054123702,0.00013364296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974585,0.00005976303,0.000021594564,0.00012462855,0.000020205494,0.000027976417],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000092118535,0.00008357325,0.0001065631,0.000028036737,0.00019331241,0.000028738985,0.00006345485,0.000034699257,0.0024077226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009866704,0.00006887332,0.000037117366,0.000011433671,0.0003754312,0.00007964138,0.000022992155,0.000075306496,0.00013389807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009416748,0.000028164935,0.00061772665,0.000017430482,0.000008581094,0.000004182353,0.0023244056,2.8434297e-7,0.0000044560898,0.9920346,0.0043937117,0.00055703684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120410645,0.000031530308,0.003703904,0.000010495636,0.000014964142,0.0000038723283,0.0002577385,0.000012566232,0.000016721733,0.43754905,0.55820304,0.00007570275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024158401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001657305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71361744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004103928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068675736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027020936","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800003666","title":"Utility and Humanity: The Quest for the<i>Honestum</i>in Cicero, Hutcheson, and Hume","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cicero; Philosophy; Morality; Humanity; Epistemology; Skepticism; Appeal; Foundation (evidence); Classics; Law; Political science; Theology; History","score_opus":0.060788001840822614,"score_gpt":0.30619604338012535,"score_spread":0.24540804153930273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027020936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34382468,0.023020484,0.00035082953,0.033773094,0.00054627785,0.0016350617,0.0001755305,0.00010881368,0.5965652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642307,0.0003539218,0.00005614475,0.0009913885,0.00016727208,0.000024054956,0.0000011753224,0.0000037902523,0.0019791634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918586,0.0001282642,0.00012837852,0.00016337237,0.00014135696,0.0002527728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985384,0.0011669047,0.00003377614,0.00014985887,0.00004572512,0.00006533734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007008111,0.000078032055,0.000103049126,0.000014768452,0.0009614514,0.000059273098,0.00014289324,0.000046335907,0.0001427956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034049738,0.00005074735,0.000030584,0.000091777896,0.0021820308,0.00008414803,0.000038361206,0.00010725258,0.0000070713218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004762394,0.000023656841,0.018396426,0.000007163321,0.000008002292,7.7860506e-7,0.0037489969,1.9012644e-7,0.0000010791955,0.97064143,0.002438057,0.0047294344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013741448,0.000019988694,0.04887674,0.000006715305,0.00002114775,0.0000015444347,0.004677436,0.00014142106,0.000002056031,0.006210823,0.9398245,0.000080175705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061490517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011510041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96443063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021661655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008782961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9295568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054837677","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800003423","title":"The ‘Two Hats’ Problem in Consequentialist Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Cognitivism (psychology); Conscience; Philosophy; Epistemology; Deontological ethics; Psychology; Internalism and externalism; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Cognition","score_opus":0.14687427661513056,"score_gpt":0.2983389804075128,"score_spread":0.15146470379238222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054837677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017169379,0.004165516,0.0000045398046,0.089537024,0.00040761934,0.00021300651,0.000028015496,0.00006545458,0.88840944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958261,0.00022428596,0.000016742262,0.0017725704,0.00016783424,0.000013360594,0.0000015143488,0.000008427901,0.0019691307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992341,0.00015233234,0.00016683269,0.00013017937,0.00013957045,0.00017700855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989498,0.00076876755,0.000028071505,0.00016087777,0.000050810428,0.000041662926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008511173,0.00007769252,0.000084000276,0.000025766407,0.0005003068,0.00015172185,0.00012056615,0.00005733943,0.00086755527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020152277,0.000051328512,0.00003210378,0.000019996429,0.0012576778,0.000059095273,0.000051431427,0.000599211,0.00010145142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048418246,0.00002199261,0.00001158032,0.00001326123,0.000006980472,0.00000498683,0.016037257,3.461356e-7,0.000004474956,0.98191047,0.0003094053,0.0016743775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013042211,0.00001508241,0.000012325643,0.000017234715,0.000003334397,0.0000014413373,0.0005284112,0.00019851344,0.000003853128,0.68921155,0.3098249,0.00005291235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040937882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030448902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97865677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012241241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014959795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9499122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071494016","doi":"10.1017/s0953820806002330","title":"Comments on Krister Bykvist ‘Prudence for Changing Selves’","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Section (typography); Reading (process); Epistemology; Welfare; Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06296930381444997,"score_gpt":0.29531400526983864,"score_spread":0.23234470145538866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071494016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.159347,0.0004231862,0.00071485597,0.0057917507,0.0022917192,0.0005198124,0.00015158013,0.00015970854,0.8306004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817609,0.0000014123148,0.000063793384,0.0038599954,0.00079668214,0.00001015691,0.000020464982,0.000010792687,0.013475776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992981,0.000016339642,0.00013666027,0.00015180842,0.00007680532,0.0003203027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947757,0.00023992352,0.000038537393,0.00016224499,0.000036653026,0.000045059533],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044787885,0.00010118316,0.000106389845,0.00008033126,0.00044162557,0.000029405324,0.00012690101,0.00003901937,0.0009975946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025661313,0.000087817556,0.00007192139,0.00001597744,0.00017699425,0.000071767216,0.000027375585,0.00008685389,0.0001981056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013407625,0.00007149446,0.00016089567,0.000020046655,0.00003165462,0.0000032335493,0.011810815,2.5497542e-7,0.000009722752,0.970953,0.013909366,0.0028954286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040850227,0.00024657775,0.0005302175,0.000044605953,0.000023291253,0.000001524404,0.0015752023,0.000019871473,0.0002562641,0.06574397,0.93099433,0.0001556301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011059911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000064915286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.917085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001581389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044668527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086941244","doi":"10.1017/s0953820811000161","title":"Degrees of Preference and Degrees of Preference Satisfaction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Preference; Revealed preference; Degree (music); Preference theory; Mathematical economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Physics; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.25027251912779697,"score_gpt":0.25363080181042363,"score_spread":0.0033582826826266676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086941244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98916477,0.00026763725,0.00011138747,0.000007419051,0.00010170217,0.00013472546,0.00004040061,0.000029084928,0.010142844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835736,0.00020130692,0.0012405394,0.000008389116,0.000008605828,0.0000069906996,5.6235484e-7,0.0000062252134,0.00017001847],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990824,0.00006697795,0.00024186412,0.00026909466,0.00018406592,0.00015562336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940395,0.00010920924,0.000120355355,0.0002673434,0.000044610846,0.000054534208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009056557,0.000108238615,0.00016283263,0.00006161773,0.00004382951,0.0000048647626,0.0001736764,0.00005515172,0.00031118953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002915171,0.0000871771,0.00003344026,0.00013801442,0.00027244573,0.00019945807,0.000081475366,0.00007946205,0.000012202532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018949973,0.00026135228,0.34307045,0.00042806656,0.000015949223,0.000008528756,0.0057228208,0.000015611884,0.52356666,0.03304053,0.00024103852,0.09343949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013938027,0.0002002,0.7944357,0.000052147792,0.000012201694,0.000006486781,0.00008227895,0.000315517,0.20310502,0.0015015344,0.000063171196,0.00008636402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008097298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028002847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45136523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060922353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024538895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3554979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091781130","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000132","title":"Ross on Self and Others","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Trilemma; Duty; Pleasure; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.026867533460950277,"score_gpt":0.22846040373200618,"score_spread":0.2015928702710559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091781130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16316548,0.00014491331,0.0000049930923,0.0023876443,0.00020453779,0.00004458139,0.000011267919,0.00008131152,0.8339553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965974,0.00000739841,0.000011127267,0.0022794863,0.0003386411,0.0000025391003,0.0000012491367,0.000008264385,0.0007538646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996162,0.000036253325,0.00006345065,0.00011049698,0.00007551448,0.0000980791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965024,0.00015264594,0.000013605937,0.000119067,0.000018008468,0.000046445017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023480534,0.00006024325,0.00006933527,0.000019887246,0.00014569567,0.000045504774,0.000051826555,0.000029995055,0.00048871984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004474217,0.00004559993,0.000023782753,0.0000058958212,0.00019873293,0.00003289003,0.000017325037,0.00011008715,0.00011915248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007995605,0.00002306287,0.000006748737,0.0000067969513,0.000009626252,3.7400505e-7,0.0053202854,2.0985715e-7,0.000003892454,0.99182487,0.00025727737,0.0025388855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009276868,0.000066501656,0.00007014038,0.0000074378363,0.000004094267,1.9552996e-7,0.00009880243,0.000108665045,0.0000109637585,0.58090085,0.41859394,0.000045658082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003664547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045659577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83343196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004720592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53511393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098619143","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808002963","title":"Well-Being, Autonomy, and the Horizon Problem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Happiness; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Psychology; Welfare; Task (project management); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.03224788498135521,"score_gpt":0.2941692804513121,"score_spread":0.26192139546995685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098619143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05225089,0.0002899776,0.000019066032,0.0300111,0.00010845482,0.00016647713,0.0000014387981,0.0000624858,0.9170901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489915,0.00009152283,0.00013987542,0.0008687652,0.00028036098,0.000009298291,6.207289e-7,0.0000038477287,0.0037065477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912125,0.00019859303,0.000104400584,0.0001258696,0.0001909478,0.00025894758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992971,0.00042168112,0.000018827212,0.00011986298,0.00003135396,0.000111188376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007760928,0.00005862521,0.00009186553,0.000014397106,0.00089603633,0.000022910845,0.00014428356,0.00008607929,0.00011688879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027052127,0.00003966054,0.000042044423,0.000084869615,0.0022233247,0.00009282163,0.0000425185,0.00019335416,0.000101705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009578711,0.000010361028,0.00029329638,0.0000040028317,0.0000054383763,0.000002312581,0.020523777,1.911149e-7,4.6407902e-7,0.9774831,0.0010927881,0.0005746905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020711089,0.000021786385,0.0006928277,0.000004879181,0.000007097712,0.0000017782628,0.0005309413,0.000021477275,0.000007821529,0.700839,0.2976133,0.000051999046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022136208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012056947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9426483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036077345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017888888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81919324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098958246","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990331","title":"Moral Schizophrenia and the Paradox of Friendship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Psychology; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Moral psychology; Phenomenon; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05768902164057853,"score_gpt":0.4412399544241247,"score_spread":0.3835509327835462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098958246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39765087,0.0003090256,0.00005667195,0.015346865,0.0009576106,0.00040136822,0.0000075214584,0.00005058048,0.5852195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950855,0.000021086986,0.0021836562,0.0010736805,0.00017598084,0.000025427124,9.69042e-7,0.000014771537,0.0014189491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980098,0.0011578387,0.00027110212,0.00013142797,0.00023225046,0.00019756137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98962,0.009682349,0.00013157775,0.0004053208,0.000065693326,0.00009506828],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051716496,0.00006548781,0.00015387672,0.000025569434,0.0003964925,0.0000028111792,0.00018287408,0.00021959904,0.0024545225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016243597,0.000038815524,0.000025999409,0.00007712516,0.0010765884,0.000052343647,0.00013179553,0.0034838591,0.00025264942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002158459,0.000016036809,0.0098204985,0.000056374192,0.000010522616,0.0000010395886,0.001777264,1.9700837e-8,0.0001120133,0.9830601,0.0033613243,0.001568945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003444538,0.000035985682,0.054595135,0.000076197146,0.00005401438,0.0000040457107,0.0039721583,0.00023452996,0.000058900114,0.8470868,0.09033565,0.00010202971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024343346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026683067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5974346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004338758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010068005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104059996","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800004052","title":"<i>Principia</i> Then and Now","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02123487866047863,"score_gpt":0.2910164832279981,"score_spread":0.2697816045675195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104059996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16866201,0.00039753277,0.00011601636,0.0004330381,0.00021323179,0.00004941783,0.0000038024416,0.00002642057,0.8300985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797827,0.000004292963,0.00014586488,0.0006274528,0.000027086735,0.0000057376214,3.2529846e-7,0.0000037436582,0.0012072516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993969,0.00008051616,0.000072182935,0.00019157938,0.00006984619,0.00018893305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995758,0.00010067123,0.000011672174,0.00020909637,0.000009026919,0.00009373694],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027679867,0.00005812949,0.000065266264,0.000014454855,0.000056397155,0.000009269919,0.00009194814,0.00004237163,0.0019861178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070987975,0.0000450868,0.00002056626,0.000081550555,0.0002553864,0.000031850766,0.000021151282,0.000072536146,0.00071043253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075908224,0.000032204367,0.00094268075,0.000001200338,0.0000049166374,0.0000054007637,0.0003991793,3.6287098e-8,0.00007771537,0.99641794,0.00040599532,0.0017051671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021834215,0.000059045833,0.011533697,0.0000030747372,0.0000062575405,0.000023264083,0.0001156957,0.0000052050723,0.00027819377,0.8582315,0.12943839,0.000087358036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000055557944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014496854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82931626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000049071236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000585605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111614934","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800003137","title":"Vices as Higher-level Evils","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Selfishness; Virtue; Malice; Feature (linguistics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12209407553739866,"score_gpt":0.3088756553733365,"score_spread":0.18678157983593785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111614934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6938743,0.00037341454,0.000020404357,0.0016084982,0.00065802364,0.00010606389,0.000018449702,0.00015273868,0.3031881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682504,0.000081659855,0.00007320403,0.002159618,0.00014207332,0.000008411957,0.0000011558916,0.00001039677,0.029273089],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898785,0.000048807822,0.0001386732,0.00031760408,0.00022277133,0.00028430088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945813,0.00011272299,0.00003117345,0.00028903794,0.000014966721,0.000093976385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007725872,0.00010894718,0.00009850793,0.0000410119,0.00012211713,0.000032738684,0.00028497062,0.000045508277,0.0041096513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017681088,0.00008839959,0.000055683413,0.00024956057,0.00008269396,0.00018187339,0.00005908771,0.00009040495,0.0034130425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013992701,0.0006671567,0.012268918,0.00007606541,0.000017381955,0.00095292134,0.0011491127,0.000013728382,0.64337695,0.1251736,0.06259271,0.15357153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000281168,0.00010317827,0.03140636,0.000021529762,0.000008071349,0.000051967123,0.000039628263,0.000082986226,0.06412349,0.011813832,0.89184177,0.00022599172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000983126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015021464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8292491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000150200485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020472366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121384512","doi":"10.1017/s0953820806002378","title":"Schultz's Sidgwick","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Coherentism; Economic Justice; Internalism and externalism; Epistemology; Foundationalism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11688273653711992,"score_gpt":0.5554238641889074,"score_spread":0.43854112765178754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121384512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077823915,0.00046744573,0.0043600025,0.009562613,0.0022868558,0.00042008545,0.000006684829,0.000258517,0.9048139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97463286,0.000030389207,0.004168999,0.012584242,0.00071948976,0.000013389185,0.0000076151446,0.000021969807,0.007821046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972312,0.0009504566,0.00047644918,0.00023406453,0.0004754696,0.0006323601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853291,0.013619941,0.00012203302,0.0004516668,0.00020511894,0.00027213004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013020105,0.00009856234,0.00014617271,0.00006578356,0.00094706996,0.000003545687,0.00023120987,0.0004099371,0.004462267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02380354,0.00008521651,0.000041813004,0.00020970778,0.00020940648,0.00012979876,0.00013472997,0.0043779337,0.007655505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025366622,0.00021925251,0.08625358,0.00042277685,0.000061336716,0.00011805882,0.0112565365,5.260055e-7,0.0008504238,0.6311283,0.2394663,0.029969243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000558989,0.00004694137,0.03945364,0.00010934069,0.00001962914,0.000002633716,0.014949678,0.000024249675,0.000087695735,0.0513761,0.89323467,0.00013640734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024859607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025250504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89699286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012148155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022180838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121478539","doi":"10.1017/s0953820805001792","title":"Utility and Capability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Epistemology; Economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03157079136568135,"score_gpt":0.30939975488992455,"score_spread":0.2778289635242432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121478539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6565962,0.0003065868,0.000053190648,0.0009777815,0.00021634011,0.00014106584,0.000024176212,0.00008602131,0.34159866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973068,0.000015459695,0.00014913263,0.00017687654,0.00024195966,0.000004094747,0.0000054391103,0.0000042674,0.0020959307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861956,0.00030798497,0.0002137644,0.00026440236,0.00027455104,0.00031972892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937576,0.00015651195,0.000038377922,0.00025312163,0.00008058185,0.00009565533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013997924,0.00009001796,0.00014557391,0.00002249563,0.00047141442,0.00004505295,0.00013088652,0.00010167849,0.0007406975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036499967,0.000083737585,0.000056225323,0.00013529717,0.0008466971,0.00018012772,0.00004397551,0.00010030201,0.000044285414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025426962,0.00019505047,0.5902476,0.00003687906,0.0000072348976,0.0000021714877,0.005028764,2.2419853e-7,0.00004106066,0.38370183,0.012539903,0.008173885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013979005,0.000014580902,0.6278775,0.0000031706566,0.0000070594283,2.915777e-7,0.0013906884,0.00004088831,0.00006768805,0.08452942,0.2858126,0.00011635436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044277716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0167815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34071067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054666867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008927847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9620865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122773855","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990240","title":"Rawls and Cohen on Facts and Principles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Primary goods; Positive economics; Economics; Economic Justice; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.1007900615427099,"score_gpt":0.3587296502886735,"score_spread":0.25793958874596357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122773855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49091217,0.00027080526,0.000003848423,0.022039061,0.00005075506,0.000088999266,0.0000074714876,0.000044036577,0.48658288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970427,0.00005038255,0.000054675067,0.0021547123,0.0001072196,4.2925427e-7,6.569797e-7,0.0000016276384,0.00058760284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.00006627044,0.00006401418,0.000117981515,0.00014201565,0.00018825183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950993,0.00023504412,0.00001082446,0.0000692295,0.00001627755,0.00015870575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032444444,0.00004890427,0.00006918973,0.000017558848,0.00024791135,0.000032928903,0.00005096003,0.00007832369,0.000028742648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005272483,0.000042427804,0.000012591557,0.00003716794,0.0003312535,0.000069403395,0.000013716302,0.00010678515,0.000017961107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006974618,0.000016676666,0.0003476183,0.000003188599,0.0000020492307,0.0000017611982,0.0042780605,1.5566415e-7,0.000010778504,0.99127704,0.00017237746,0.0038833185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013700845,0.00011744495,0.07076069,0.000018914583,0.000006559743,4.977759e-7,0.0006658505,0.000012317444,0.000077842065,0.8149945,0.11311655,0.00009184214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015233901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052555315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5061305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014801623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031328702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19067587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132482899","doi":"10.1017/s0953820811000070","title":"Dead and Gone","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Virtue; Welfare; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.09944507161060448,"score_gpt":0.2089704965621464,"score_spread":0.10952542495154191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132482899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24605413,0.0009185411,0.000002279194,0.0003223678,0.0001963252,0.000031148298,0.0000094652105,0.000037957005,0.7524278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992851,0.0000074879904,0.000053043375,0.00031032012,0.00015642097,0.0000023748494,0.0000016300946,0.0000037284792,0.006613985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974495,0.000015290925,0.000056015804,0.000078787736,0.00002254742,0.00008243406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983764,0.000022970442,0.00001195084,0.00008608443,0.000013536015,0.00002782135],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000060636186,0.00004803572,0.000058911824,0.000018528108,0.000115999785,0.000007763573,0.00004657327,0.000021127658,0.008359022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008466192,0.000038954928,0.000018092667,0.0000041373783,0.00030987218,0.00006195336,0.000018240387,0.00004779315,0.00026555712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017009506,0.000012265398,0.0008177133,0.000004883777,0.000011962117,0.000002387412,0.018916588,1.5619241e-9,0.0000026449013,0.97683275,0.0018649622,0.0015168502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015569916,0.00009801747,0.008486298,0.00000679501,0.000018136041,0.000004385803,0.0007998056,0.0000022236577,0.00006364074,0.6103572,0.37991408,0.00009366659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009440489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013257985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7467969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000013462204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029866492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99254745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133696524","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990392","title":"On Sidgwick's Demise: A Reply to Professor Deigh","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Philosophy; Suspect; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.03839211748810955,"score_gpt":0.281089518611169,"score_spread":0.24269740112305943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133696524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43889493,0.0000370241,0.00000458114,0.029026981,0.0012524906,0.00024560108,0.000052420055,0.00013042643,0.5303556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97788304,9.305262e-7,0.00005001188,0.015608654,0.0008069099,0.000036997066,0.0000059138456,0.000020343257,0.005587216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990747,0.0000416552,0.00017500798,0.0002609392,0.00020187012,0.00024580708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989497,0.0003115069,0.000032420827,0.00042990554,0.00011299385,0.0001634556],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041707227,0.00012908518,0.00013869407,0.000048371523,0.00028191457,0.000074461364,0.00021960615,0.00007640168,0.0043200664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063567027,0.00010053565,0.000074666445,0.0000292825,0.00023629222,0.00006708285,0.000066228946,0.00059611973,0.0012472653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005790527,0.00008155817,0.0000054350157,0.00001278475,0.000012506122,0.0000060158927,0.0053626867,2.0833176e-7,0.0003047168,0.9871262,0.005907275,0.0011227132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101181504,0.00009026817,0.00006399075,0.000015670596,0.0000057451075,7.158657e-7,0.00013426435,0.0000086742975,0.00015842111,0.5924939,0.40683207,0.00009510212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010502731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039566873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5389881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000102992135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039857427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141018876","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990094","title":"Utilitarianism and Psychological Realism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Realism; Flourishing; Normative; Epistemology; Empirical psychology; Value (mathematics); Moral realism; Philosophy; Philosophical realism; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Economics; Theoretical psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1057381843068476,"score_gpt":0.30573340685169004,"score_spread":0.19999522254484242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141018876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13011405,0.0007045046,0.000013410053,0.01622378,0.00027212346,0.0000926509,0.00003117129,0.0001226591,0.85242563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943565,0.00003955859,0.000053151067,0.0043714345,0.0003854938,0.0000023496493,0.0000066828,0.000005111352,0.0007797025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929476,0.00004764722,0.0001445462,0.00022183843,0.00011217776,0.00017905263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995656,0.00008441472,0.000020660422,0.00019892877,0.00003625148,0.0000941554],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025981618,0.000102595804,0.00012791851,0.00003253175,0.00020905034,0.00006425054,0.00010291616,0.000077936864,0.0014630834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006963348,0.000077518016,0.000047447786,0.000014801636,0.00040656788,0.000079375015,0.00002242692,0.0002262385,0.000082926286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019790346,0.000081922255,0.0000018677933,0.000002787555,0.000004813397,0.000008290534,0.003239009,2.3882277e-8,0.000021897866,0.98691607,0.000732125,0.008971397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001552414,0.00022746879,0.00092154054,0.000007280538,0.0000065908494,0.0000048825264,0.00022386623,0.000018009525,0.0000037858954,0.8615326,0.13681076,0.000087943896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003265228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002327192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000058467676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049488785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144604339","doi":"10.1017/s0953820804001153","title":"The Appeal of Utilitarianism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Welfarism; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Economics; Positive economics; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Philosophy; Welfare; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.048314278732881945,"score_gpt":0.3414845816633871,"score_spread":0.2931703029305051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144604339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03212488,0.00070911885,0.00019856905,0.04796689,0.00048317717,0.00015613445,0.000015161323,0.000059696555,0.9182864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998942,0.000029913916,0.00011257471,0.00028868002,0.00016438878,0.0000025424686,5.6169364e-7,0.000003018682,0.0004562933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912995,0.00009658445,0.00013783124,0.000087278306,0.0002740257,0.00027430474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929374,0.0003562667,0.000023067016,0.00017185815,0.000057676723,0.000097376054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008837958,0.0000452903,0.000068845155,0.000011453605,0.0005752085,0.000014294044,0.00024306751,0.00008451733,0.00004387092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081991305,0.000032356114,0.00006230369,0.000106886306,0.0012497826,0.000060855906,0.000029710189,0.0001445023,0.00007179009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055334,0.000020102034,0.00003291744,0.0000031912828,0.000005351278,6.9068983e-7,0.0049227118,0.0000016113314,0.000008336433,0.99404484,0.00014350784,0.00081120123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009197106,0.000021540849,0.0011353372,0.0000069050107,0.0000046215805,1.6500991e-7,0.0018833247,0.0000011784026,0.000091981965,0.8814758,0.11525251,0.000034631317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033771852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009945912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96681714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047336966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023663751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5105316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151151846","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800002880","title":"Sidgwick's Minimal Metaethics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Reputation; Philosophy; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.036410559724372876,"score_gpt":0.3348963710062298,"score_spread":0.2984858112818569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151151846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17267549,0.0003103783,0.000031773037,0.0017077096,0.0002195335,0.00005519386,0.000011644696,0.000061093866,0.8249272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922381,0.0000043303567,0.00021691418,0.0012756346,0.00012603031,0.0000086308255,0.0000020108318,0.0000060587186,0.0061222794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990306,0.00011424472,0.00013500995,0.0002651541,0.00015871401,0.0002963014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993275,0.00019460899,0.000013241141,0.00032628299,0.000015219032,0.00012318995],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035947244,0.00008520219,0.00010439046,0.000021312788,0.00008115745,0.000012642752,0.0002536294,0.000098222146,0.06365638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059985512,0.00006957652,0.000068208035,0.0001746302,0.00044238503,0.0000544653,0.000019293902,0.00018554929,0.0080621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055651613,0.00008310485,0.000070405265,0.0000014454438,0.0000145948,0.000019685207,0.0008170989,4.2180133e-7,0.00004769403,0.96121174,0.0011773433,0.03650079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031526265,0.00016972177,0.01312301,0.000005479179,0.00002492788,0.000024158637,0.00012775401,0.0000504699,0.00020662465,0.7748057,0.21096614,0.00018074094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033178578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023593047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8195626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000866755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012199698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99271023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153480875","doi":"10.1017/s0953820812000386","title":"Aggregation and the Separateness of Persons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.043947020994198525,"score_gpt":0.325211589978441,"score_spread":0.2812645689842425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153480875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5561119,0.0005122994,0.000030181563,0.03481896,0.00010204047,0.00022167558,0.0000056904605,0.000019189398,0.40817806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989466,0.00001554915,0.000025310763,0.00029635956,0.00005651958,0.0000069092835,3.0296206e-7,0.0000011590175,0.000651271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955624,0.00013729325,0.000057996876,0.00004746124,0.00010613847,0.00009485407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947673,0.0003595033,0.000016226395,0.00005987089,0.00004684488,0.00004083558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041087883,0.000024006144,0.000051862466,0.000008166631,0.00018165656,0.000015350837,0.00006178167,0.00004218778,0.00012279535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037061368,0.000015160764,0.000020658686,0.000055212884,0.0011332851,0.00008540672,0.0000126360865,0.000054928478,0.000028660796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000381225,0.000005016019,0.00028562592,0.0000045154898,0.0000034816621,4.37803e-8,0.011173859,2.0585027e-7,0.00000510861,0.98689914,0.0003984742,0.001220695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020261436,0.00000886342,0.005217718,0.000008603203,0.00000971908,1.7156682e-7,0.004952579,0.00015622655,0.00007884624,0.98215,0.007179031,0.000035636647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004562336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000101537815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44283473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006657691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031231415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6896918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154724959","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808003257","title":"Defending Limits on the Sacrifices We Ought To Make For Others","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Value (mathematics); Obligation; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Position (finance); Set (abstract data type); Space (punctuation); Law; Sociology; Political science; Business; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.25006695954333685,"score_gpt":0.30003610400269826,"score_spread":0.0499691444593614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154724959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44528118,0.0018334392,0.00041940872,0.054824952,0.0034117815,0.0017001427,0.00036782437,0.0003300521,0.4918312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96985483,0.000044441837,0.000117869145,0.0018356873,0.000695668,0.000072853734,0.000010732691,0.000018833141,0.027349055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993065,0.00003410461,0.00014303619,0.0001864473,0.00013960499,0.00019031332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991759,0.00042457326,0.000039984618,0.0002438055,0.00007268575,0.00004303256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026809808,0.00009731681,0.00009003233,0.00005237641,0.0008006372,0.000068970185,0.00015729488,0.000038703365,0.0005290687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015737728,0.000065917804,0.00007162086,0.000025102483,0.00015896457,0.000056958906,0.000009088206,0.00010134347,0.00032682493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005055537,0.000045123314,0.000034045795,0.00003504542,0.000024003662,8.1010535e-7,0.15248527,0.000010314349,0.000096516764,0.7407595,0.10202958,0.004429254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088161636,0.00007295694,0.00016445873,0.000030925916,0.000013959581,7.209334e-7,0.018686632,0.000054366763,0.00057542603,0.0044400617,0.97577196,0.00010036922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067190485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007374126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8737424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021298689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018925673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61579347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156642301","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000181","title":"On the Equivalence of Trolleys and Transplants: The Lack of Intrinsic Difference between ‘Collateral Damage’ and Intended Harm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral damage; Collateral; Harm; Scrutiny; Illusion; Law and economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.17015251227983363,"score_gpt":0.30819701557935225,"score_spread":0.13804450329951862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156642301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930739,0.000034573277,0.000048030117,0.005269483,0.00006590004,0.00014949954,0.000046691166,0.000007380366,0.0013045504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988116,0.000057258716,0.000013877566,0.0009928959,0.000017836323,0.0000041757085,7.547249e-7,0.0000033056942,0.0000982858],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999133,0.00019608869,0.00017510694,0.00020362425,0.00016152076,0.00013066524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987543,0.00093375245,0.00006470986,0.00019677883,0.000015272168,0.000035179302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029600388,0.00009136574,0.00016023712,0.000028987792,0.00008350582,0.000008276016,0.0002371762,0.000033277745,0.000032503853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013219997,0.000045813813,0.000029857394,0.00007204605,0.00068643014,0.0000319236,0.00005270865,0.00012236365,0.0000036910485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023597472,0.0007713079,0.1043254,0.00055635464,0.00015332196,0.000013355049,0.009554384,0.000020487882,0.4842719,0.27846184,0.002549046,0.11696284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000924531,0.0006223181,0.91736525,0.00012674363,0.00003224423,0.000008519524,0.00010533451,0.00033356575,0.038908076,0.041230716,0.00023931252,0.000103390485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015287014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002182598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81303984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000036927765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005375574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25291803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261960870","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000217","title":"Huei-chun Su, Economic Justice and Liberty: The Social Philosophy in John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism (London and New York: Routledge, 2013), pp. xx + 214.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Mill; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.083299977522055,"score_gpt":0.32439919064092054,"score_spread":0.24109921311886556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261960870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5117362,0.016035382,0.000024347866,0.03837931,0.0012964495,0.00081284327,0.000089898975,0.00013757976,0.43148798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532956,0.00033915532,0.00007573059,0.0015408099,0.001038923,0.000013056483,0.0000032823132,0.000015439424,0.0016440687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979084,0.0005202508,0.00032646823,0.0004043211,0.00022705623,0.0006134756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857,0.0006403921,0.00006604921,0.00023601107,0.000040416613,0.0004471023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00172608,0.00020134992,0.0002940755,0.000049535956,0.00062466145,0.00015413426,0.0003493099,0.0002046732,0.00022685481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060302863,0.00016582514,0.00006145081,0.00014619598,0.0012672379,0.00046723709,0.00019095442,0.00029466546,0.00020329695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010409482,0.000049398706,0.0010650383,0.000021385444,0.000023356863,0.0000055854266,0.026677944,0.00000248704,0.000005406339,0.93465114,0.031366583,0.006027611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088411686,0.00009650664,0.007787881,0.00002875208,0.00008112395,0.0000033914769,0.009812001,0.00011590383,0.000010252052,0.6929935,0.2879031,0.00028346866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009489904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019472297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4835933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015470959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039622426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271845555","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000291","title":"Mill on Mental Health Acts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Legislature; Mental health; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Test (biology); Social psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry; Political science; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12240077137454458,"score_gpt":0.4199633537737443,"score_spread":0.2975625823991997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271845555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091013834,0.00028998867,0.000005706522,0.010020586,0.00045084066,0.00013232557,0.00002261411,0.00007052164,0.89799356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99245,0.000013838923,0.000061194434,0.005158737,0.0001226569,0.0000020432758,0.000002081841,0.0000026234034,0.0021868253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905866,0.0002234009,0.000081304,0.00010395439,0.00022742567,0.000305267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993902,0.00007456794,0.000016886872,0.00010432726,0.000021962845,0.0003920492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000928609,0.000044278804,0.00006900691,0.000016312892,0.00021781988,0.000010760002,0.00012740403,0.000031513697,0.00018715549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005242466,0.000038969796,0.000024249928,0.00007619616,0.00023464013,0.00010559225,0.000026859516,0.00006262609,0.0007102437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017928009,0.0000363716,0.00020196599,0.0000016557799,0.0000021498172,7.480561e-7,0.009308499,4.0781774e-7,0.00000280966,0.9745894,0.013104488,0.0027335896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014402956,0.00013776678,0.00091721927,0.000014937584,7.2268983e-7,2.926866e-7,0.003804165,0.0000034632103,0.00009343686,0.13944413,0.8553776,0.00006221931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005474658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007913074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90143615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015116052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020731434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9128983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331076044","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000539","title":"Human Rights, Categorical Duties: A Dilemma for Instrumentalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Dilemma; Categorical variable; Normative; Human rights; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.07670098403710218,"score_gpt":0.3681353748928335,"score_spread":0.2914343908557313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331076044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28757644,0.0000909284,0.0005895658,0.06143347,0.0012641276,0.0007994627,0.00025402397,0.00035293162,0.64763904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957008,0.0000014303637,0.00008243416,0.00041865496,0.0006078378,0.0000343402,0.0000038071287,0.0000063745847,0.0031443448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988671,0.00009695559,0.00016197312,0.00019388237,0.00024323764,0.00043687483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992089,0.00033836876,0.000025338166,0.00015588843,0.000059618586,0.0002118397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043478757,0.00008501995,0.000116692,0.000030672236,0.0009266517,0.00002886986,0.00021762706,0.00015528976,0.00059786416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026803568,0.000055730758,0.000094353265,0.00007058282,0.00081503304,0.0001799376,0.000035768397,0.000080402904,0.000121054116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065045674,0.000036288893,0.0000750376,0.000005675276,0.000008761645,0.0000012567484,0.001443913,6.9885875e-9,0.00003182748,0.9926908,0.0052200663,0.00047984414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018664387,0.000036071197,0.00015549979,0.000006728102,0.0000063548105,2.2298346e-7,0.000114223236,5.2320513e-7,0.00008728862,0.59914714,0.40019378,0.00006552639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030602722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008538596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70812434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015104207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061295264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7127149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468793022","doi":"10.1017/s0953820816000170","title":"Effort and Achievement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Competence (human resources); Distributive justice; Epistemology; Distributive property; Positive economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05411237397655988,"score_gpt":0.25748381885523397,"score_spread":0.2033714448786741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468793022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7405575,0.00092753523,0.00007153969,0.005884038,0.0009999586,0.00016716713,0.000053701366,0.00009577151,0.25124282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733483,0.000047873033,0.000044008302,0.000560552,0.0003000529,0.000007201482,0.00000218841,0.0000073332367,0.02568245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953365,0.000020068726,0.00010430884,0.0001302586,0.00007302598,0.00013867868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967396,0.000080791084,0.000024187957,0.00014308217,0.000035522833,0.000042470037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001869791,0.00007065468,0.000097041884,0.000021084667,0.00012789352,0.000020901458,0.000054281325,0.000027934308,0.0005790723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020372512,0.00004183395,0.000034629928,0.000005167568,0.00039837646,0.00007926836,0.000032787455,0.000048658916,0.00013959993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008340131,0.000043622687,0.0016028584,0.000022574857,0.000028654873,0.0000016083452,0.006740219,7.804867e-9,0.00011581591,0.97525716,0.0046784636,0.011500698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002448813,0.00010363006,0.0021411718,0.000020960782,0.000017359707,8.2139707e-7,0.0008108609,0.000001261324,0.00020738508,0.04661875,0.9497448,0.000088106455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062707535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000286133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94506633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000895948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010647367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6340436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483301427","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000369","title":"Value and Preference Relations: Are They Symmetric?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Value (mathematics); Dilemma; Relation (database); Preference relation; Symmetry (geometry); Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Positive economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.1859911685268948,"score_gpt":0.26814648802992597,"score_spread":0.08215531950303118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483301427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11368554,0.002409257,0.0000138063115,0.004089391,0.00031518925,0.00011531493,0.000054203363,0.00008117676,0.8792361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977367,0.000022188398,0.00003428959,0.00040504785,0.00020469651,0.000006602087,0.0000048176726,0.000007150137,0.0015785095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994462,0.000060683305,0.00010979623,0.00013474768,0.00014245974,0.00010610386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940896,0.00019811376,0.000036576548,0.00015000923,0.000107633874,0.000098719196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036358647,0.00007158816,0.00009200202,0.000058808077,0.00014279531,0.00006882797,0.0000797867,0.00004724668,0.00021274683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045791527,0.00005498008,0.000023037694,0.000024243001,0.00019494139,0.000120865174,0.000052200263,0.0001715476,0.00016746343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008141742,0.000022957433,0.00011026516,0.0000075123908,0.000009512032,0.0000012809573,0.0071449294,0.0000013020493,4.1882737e-7,0.99145883,0.0004295639,0.0008052983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014060637,0.000043321306,0.00057724916,0.000020970705,0.00001066219,8.967369e-7,0.0013672712,0.00016225319,0.000002343757,0.9095955,0.08800843,0.00007051001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016352105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013776809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88405114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015311825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028366483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23294286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598556056","doi":"10.1017/s0953820817000048","title":"Prichard's Arguments against Ideal Utilitarianism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Ideal (ethics); Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.044302715380062044,"score_gpt":0.2478539746170053,"score_spread":0.20355125923694328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598556056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3630667,0.00086424244,0.00066191814,0.00074088515,0.0015113975,0.00018767187,0.00034858062,0.00006198288,0.6325566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993895,0.000109011584,0.000508019,0.00043348165,0.00017952098,0.000024086155,0.000025244055,0.000017757866,0.0048078834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986301,0.000011770017,0.0005190004,0.0004596837,0.000022342541,0.00035710805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983426,0.000028400358,0.00032364362,0.0011577464,0.000017764425,0.00012986542],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006422413,0.00016570839,0.00032168126,0.00010023485,0.0009217674,0.00018383937,0.000657948,0.00011463144,0.0014279127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032775037,0.0002007881,0.00015708104,0.000030655716,0.00025104915,0.0006627063,0.00017600655,0.00016676345,0.006162733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010324271,0.0000628159,0.020061841,0.000008982559,0.000051990228,0.000005279449,0.00020404252,0.0000073755436,0.000013382981,0.9760222,0.0019348523,0.001616955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007281185,0.00003950533,0.10872916,0.000016676244,0.000006206949,0.0000033229908,0.00008745655,0.0006179512,0.00010086734,0.36191633,0.52742636,0.0003280533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018496539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031704967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6308283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106676336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027261443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801048049","doi":"10.1017/s0953820818000067","title":"Scales for Scope: A New Solution to the Scope Problem for Pro-Attitude-Based Well-Being","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Limiting; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Tone (literature); Wish; Well-being; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07859569776412613,"score_gpt":0.3805006486859248,"score_spread":0.3019049509217987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801048049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056340387,0.0010557745,0.18386072,0.40118486,0.0017662516,0.010589667,0.000121502504,0.00042524486,0.39536196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756713,0.0000052405576,0.014426924,0.0052039595,0.0024929072,0.00027212076,0.0000086278715,0.000017323098,0.0019016027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855196,0.00010617438,0.00019594473,0.00027547329,0.00028023755,0.000590192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986863,0.0005783607,0.000038743503,0.00021644322,0.00023543742,0.00024468944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016204877,0.00010933819,0.00012948131,0.000038291262,0.0013483637,0.000099635,0.00035786873,0.0001362803,0.00006042742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001259283,0.00008223836,0.000106395106,0.00020863656,0.0005548169,0.00013813193,0.000043334127,0.000106807645,0.00016559912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015660505,0.00006642211,0.00005637738,0.000100899066,0.00001775184,1.48025e-7,0.004950481,0.000009453712,0.00011287294,0.92487407,0.06107863,0.008576307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035132037,0.00029867643,0.00012803225,0.00011687778,0.00002763408,9.409959e-8,0.00020442437,0.00026786636,0.0011557041,0.42270634,0.5746029,0.00014013912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010850106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061612017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102654354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005491466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895769854","doi":"10.1017/s0953820818000237","title":"On Two Interpretations of the Desire-Satisfaction Theory of Prudential Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Object (grammar); Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Epistemology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.030350179224699424,"score_gpt":0.2904351899425258,"score_spread":0.2600850107178264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895769854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98158914,0.000012256305,0.001384144,0.00004532905,0.00063851546,0.00011995252,0.000020971103,0.000014431651,0.016175268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995059,0.0000014428228,0.00005737697,0.00012788997,0.000035249926,0.0000032706803,1.979828e-7,0.0000045967854,0.00026410044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929863,0.00017783763,0.0001465814,0.00012693845,0.00016998428,0.00008004376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993823,0.0002447151,0.00007632788,0.00025053715,0.000030492562,0.000015615387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013814782,0.00005151474,0.00006359346,0.000033785724,0.00007725734,0.000004533862,0.00017031588,0.000019082607,0.00029599218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006307596,0.000033504555,0.00006186932,0.00014675956,0.0003460153,0.00006317577,0.000043262415,0.000055139724,0.000035583093],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008011402,0.00008577303,0.0014941022,0.000015526713,0.000006491398,4.1769357e-7,0.0013787744,0.00004006061,0.40880516,0.57369614,0.00027001713,0.01412742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018212326,0.00017288818,0.050422084,0.000049526257,0.000016406224,0.0000022401282,0.000065654014,0.00082566333,0.8273112,0.12081593,0.00008750934,0.000048772356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004076135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018667975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45288023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010099822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021188118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3240907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954017355","doi":"10.1017/s0953820818000316","title":"Sidgwick's Dualism of Practical Reason, Evolutionary Debunking, and Moral Psychology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Dualism; Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Intuitionism; Epistemology; Prudence; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.12371495770278428,"score_gpt":0.3470355135611986,"score_spread":0.22332055585841432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954017355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674784,0.00025555165,0.00003098359,0.0079318015,0.0005315548,0.00015116554,0.000020408314,0.0000356405,0.023564491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576026,0.0000569761,0.0009853403,0.0025484655,0.00004387997,0.000005031757,0.0000042329493,0.0000076219585,0.00058818224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988061,0.00013934574,0.00020549621,0.00040803454,0.00021768782,0.00022330093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993447,0.00021789756,0.00007629183,0.00025257622,0.000029542482,0.00007900945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017384066,0.000104766725,0.00016315286,0.00006339567,0.000050866576,0.000005148587,0.00011781934,0.00009994998,0.00046990017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024193079,0.00009241739,0.00004660188,0.000103177044,0.00033426288,0.00013808552,0.00007858529,0.00016028313,0.0002574982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011322154,0.0017279204,0.18031992,0.00011818175,0.000052959807,0.00016469993,0.0007145952,0.0000105071385,0.20549741,0.48403567,0.11827065,0.007955255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015760008,0.00073126814,0.8765879,0.000048691516,0.000025663427,0.00093781314,0.00008800097,0.00048939657,0.005913905,0.067072146,0.046244502,0.00028468648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016633761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011827713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.696268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013373818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025421135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5145077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966602879","doi":"10.1017/s0953820819000256","title":"On ‘Hybrid’ Theories of Personal Good","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Element (criminal law); State (computer science); Mathematical economics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.015121515441197544,"score_gpt":0.2353595637368893,"score_spread":0.22023804829569174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966602879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88671327,0.000046882993,0.0000078826,0.00012663439,0.00028471666,0.00007446404,0.00004062629,0.000024941379,0.1126806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954873,0.00000397242,0.000011955297,0.00029496415,0.000022934246,0.0000018775149,7.7222137e-7,0.0000056997924,0.004170581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993705,0.00003835317,0.00008842883,0.0001882358,0.00018171198,0.0001327575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956053,0.00019537316,0.000028054706,0.00017696945,0.000010516778,0.0000285395],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007125372,0.00006603176,0.00008810782,0.00002800424,0.000031570708,0.000006219345,0.0001399869,0.000016321925,0.0015403205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018736401,0.00004984464,0.00005446081,0.00007569557,0.00009191897,0.00005813497,0.000030870895,0.00006648985,0.0007087233],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009533128,0.00018650026,0.0036093416,0.000056950907,0.0000049159153,0.000014114757,0.000966018,0.000004934545,0.2175378,0.76760036,0.0018089868,0.008114745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055548473,0.00064186443,0.010049001,0.000055058175,0.000007695642,0.000015164275,0.0002442572,0.0006224434,0.88465047,0.09018333,0.01275376,0.00022145995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008510564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.3442275e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67741704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006469654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015493439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016237943","doi":"10.1017/s0953820820000060","title":"The Vegan's Dilemma","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); French horn; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Animal ethics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.007736165118407698,"score_gpt":0.18539852131224324,"score_spread":0.17766235619383555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016237943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93833715,0.00011354854,0.00008613174,0.01883084,0.0000656776,0.00024155223,0.0000055954683,0.00007209417,0.0422474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997873,0.0000101881515,0.000070224974,0.0014066688,0.000050336836,0.000008016208,0.0000025488794,0.0000055232804,0.0005735121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921674,0.000041759835,0.00010434593,0.00019437542,0.00019395037,0.00024884174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995804,0.000058870828,0.000021525113,0.00017347094,0.0000014632403,0.00016430015],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011485878,0.00009201944,0.000062024774,0.0000015375442,0.00027853998,0.00003145736,0.00023995899,0.00003386138,0.0021985923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012864314,0.00005073558,0.000055633194,0.0001226865,0.00029333145,0.00014438016,0.00021351074,0.000112663794,0.0020898033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026375998,0.00028740967,0.2849971,0.00003398253,0.00006873961,0.000069552916,0.010164202,0.0029339262,0.008113047,0.0040175132,0.5356976,0.15335321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009562915,0.00008366202,0.25335371,7.4629804e-7,0.0000064137535,0.000002654961,0.0009841257,0.00025522726,0.00036972016,0.0009468647,0.7438018,0.00009948496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103216094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026475822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2081042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010311958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000273243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036563981","doi":"10.1017/s0953820820000138","title":"Sidgwick's Distinction Passage","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Utilitarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.09239672567249559,"score_gpt":0.23545652548527007,"score_spread":0.1430597998127745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036563981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019121218,0.00020915964,0.00012247585,0.03599037,0.00042032683,0.00008859525,0.000068065834,0.0001979132,0.94378185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943319,0.0000041236694,0.0000085494785,0.004035573,0.0010974512,0.000004459628,0.000014235001,0.000009770899,0.0004939318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994806,0.000033983233,0.000110799156,0.00014346695,0.000116056544,0.00011510746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996726,0.00007554445,0.000023019478,0.00009817038,0.000036944835,0.000093756804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000097529206,0.000072948606,0.00008683189,0.000011821463,0.00016707975,0.000053957563,0.00008734851,0.000032759177,0.004722472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012473087,0.00006020536,0.000059003036,0.00001812792,0.00020458699,0.00007763887,0.000037180613,0.00017994376,0.00065453857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014093251,0.000018631012,0.000010964265,0.000016244492,0.000010114508,0.000004357165,0.0060198535,4.51425e-7,0.000028559914,0.99059093,0.001474606,0.0018111933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008731201,0.000052388394,0.000062385916,0.0000042714473,0.000008120754,2.2968419e-7,0.0004186785,0.00018925256,0.000024530264,0.51500076,0.48408622,0.00006588396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029791358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030331803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97521067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007166703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011369098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124021968","doi":"10.1017/s0953820811000252","title":"Bentham on Presumed Offences","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Value (mathematics); Law; Probabilistic logic; Jeremy bentham; Reasonable doubt; Proxy (statistics); Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.19807827353361548,"score_gpt":0.25762180641838406,"score_spread":0.059543532884768574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124021968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6724655,0.00006113266,0.000007982917,0.000102408296,0.00047183468,0.00011023765,0.000013244151,0.000093530725,0.3266741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967743,0.000015164306,0.000072635106,0.00046915264,0.00004117778,0.000010072931,4.616557e-7,0.0000058792803,0.002611156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923694,0.00004685963,0.00009951406,0.00025764186,0.0001670061,0.00019204908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958825,0.00007214742,0.00002496983,0.00024487497,0.000007118188,0.00006261794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000062469495,0.0000793428,0.0000673944,0.00003455972,0.00007829633,0.000009161176,0.00024736422,0.000028849063,0.0016488511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023975216,0.000059057245,0.0000411852,0.000103721955,0.000104575665,0.000091356975,0.00003850889,0.00007092934,0.0009095424],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005779629,0.0028244192,0.027892752,0.0001263172,0.000029616507,0.00044213288,0.015206945,0.000008086559,0.33580986,0.33592364,0.08568549,0.19547279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033658216,0.000493472,0.08299465,0.000036474852,0.000009530922,0.000008067996,0.00012323547,0.00020723967,0.8477916,0.01765375,0.05006652,0.00027886702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047974067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000072345606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5119817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006031315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010153436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156377128","doi":"10.1017/s095382082100011x","title":"What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Population; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.16720809244975068,"score_gpt":0.4030050556124028,"score_spread":0.2357969631626521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156377128","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012357408,0.003646674,0.0000076767155,0.5558536,0.001500309,0.00013386115,0.000015554582,0.00007446282,0.42641047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97286665,0.00079697935,0.000014030693,0.017965643,0.0006381618,0.00000613404,0.000003402728,0.000006626656,0.0077023525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832505,0.00040455756,0.00015334008,0.00022586959,0.000526939,0.00036423065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985511,0.0008655644,0.000026837362,0.00031551905,0.000110595,0.00013042058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089936244,0.000085680236,0.00011546325,0.000014734958,0.0011884029,0.00014961865,0.00027094517,0.0001580675,0.0007332172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010082936,0.000056765526,0.00010555075,0.0002009669,0.00069300615,0.0001809933,0.00012511013,0.00037954518,0.0002628488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071618806,0.000042021027,0.000015129969,0.000006617691,0.000009224802,0.000025507521,0.016264293,5.929136e-7,0.000019875972,0.96946394,0.009111186,0.0050344574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006755734,0.000017029597,0.00049829425,0.000057810157,0.000009957848,9.4828584e-7,0.009556447,0.000008878238,0.00019042134,0.37006146,0.6194604,0.00007081944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026317048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046371308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96050924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006157465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021507133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91403544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215937039","doi":"10.1017/s095382082100039x","title":"Human Extinction and Moral Worthwhileness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond","keywords":"Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Existentialism; Philosophy; Sacrifice; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Theology; Physics","score_opus":0.054565776563617094,"score_gpt":0.24699603160291195,"score_spread":0.19243025503929484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215937039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65920424,0.0013376181,0.0000024361423,0.0011625335,0.00041267276,0.00003258289,0.000014628485,0.00005068379,0.3377826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98732764,0.0000057266166,0.000012052285,0.00030370147,0.000462082,0.0000039042084,0.000019369592,0.000005441929,0.011860105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995935,0.000039415416,0.00008628167,0.00013914268,0.00004419566,0.000097439624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997647,0.000022483513,0.000018822226,0.0001196384,0.00004414998,0.000030196037],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006980747,0.00006440939,0.000085878935,0.000020802705,0.00031336484,0.000037646372,0.000034766963,0.000031545547,0.007981162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010814535,0.00006012172,0.00003096588,0.0000113321585,0.0002213713,0.000094127565,0.000029412162,0.000075701675,0.000059834165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000672964,0.000033837317,0.0014554849,0.0000140793545,0.0000176598,0.000013043146,0.0032710365,2.8130125e-7,0.000053043495,0.9915347,0.0015737339,0.0020263798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034182644,0.00006851011,0.018172368,0.000020542882,0.00003581256,0.000018387553,0.0017568091,0.0000089536325,0.00022420027,0.46696216,0.5122171,0.00017335343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027144757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041656662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52457255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039402594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008990322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238668407","doi":"10.1017/s0953820817000085","title":"UTI volume 29 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Göteborgs Universitet; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; University of Missouri; University of East Anglia; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; University College London; London School of Economics and Political Science; Saint Louis University; York University; Tulane University; University of Otago; Queen Mary University of London; Florida State University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Environmental science; Geography; Meteorology; Physics; Engineering; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.026757242881305147,"score_gpt":0.3265337810120632,"score_spread":0.29977653813075805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238668407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019958977,0.0005479771,0.000018371902,0.059612848,0.00030144883,0.00010299475,0.000013973482,0.00002404354,0.91941935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72121125,0.000088335044,0.00009120524,0.00070029567,0.00032773367,0.0000034980333,3.1673022e-7,0.0000039573056,0.2775734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993604,0.000040659022,0.00007718181,0.00014812412,0.00013332952,0.00024031513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995776,0.00003205657,0.000046623034,0.00023859249,0.000018836541,0.00008628234],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020246544,0.00006837994,0.000111871326,0.000013754692,0.0016657606,0.000093054405,0.0001812282,0.000055001903,0.0077275266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015949944,0.000055789416,0.000030833307,0.00000972985,0.0008475671,0.00015971159,0.00013151325,0.0000605324,0.0080541875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050770122,0.000010380852,0.16436382,0.0000073200263,0.000021621681,0.0000029445032,0.016047204,2.7421498e-8,9.2181136e-7,0.0024471625,0.8144604,0.002633146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000678218,0.0000064891956,0.31219077,0.0000057127904,0.0000083824625,2.8065952e-7,0.001455433,0.0000049747823,0.0000015555022,0.0019096879,0.68429375,0.000055171648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011161635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007439411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7012523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024225777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028391094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243381491","doi":"10.1017/s0953820819000037","title":"UTI volume 31 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Göteborgs Universitet; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; University of Missouri; University of East Anglia; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; University College London; London School of Economics and Political Science; Saint Louis University; York University; Tulane University; University of Otago; Queen Mary University of London; Florida State University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Geography; Physics; Engineering; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.01958851249040404,"score_gpt":0.1927269284122684,"score_spread":0.17313841592186435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243381491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19176748,0.0017621826,0.00001689765,0.000430687,0.0020811455,0.00013305416,0.00029520222,0.000016962284,0.80349636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31763932,0.000044928798,0.00008116236,0.0004620468,0.000051313873,0.0000043016234,0.000004803009,0.0000071951204,0.68170494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990877,0.0000034108525,0.00025341669,0.00040797298,0.000017087792,0.00023040953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995539,0.000018113411,0.00008074233,0.00028243635,0.000009724863,0.00005504083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024574247,0.00010352434,0.00026738242,0.00007752448,0.000061202074,0.00006557988,0.00011590595,0.00004968954,0.23486744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015698073,0.00011434141,0.00005812096,0.00003783931,0.00007940648,0.00019107648,0.00012324098,0.0000574104,0.7078637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005788548,0.000014974152,0.20698318,0.000015263166,0.000036258833,5.716495e-7,0.00047735064,0.000004403913,0.000002004724,0.003502679,0.7888564,0.00010110654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002650913,0.00001571025,0.07508407,0.000004077333,0.0000031453458,9.4250385e-7,0.00028742873,0.00061456236,0.000004794113,0.0014782381,0.9221034,0.00013854927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015122618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011677287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47299626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004323922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051729075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.765832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243807325","doi":"10.1017/s095382081700019x","title":"UTI volume 29 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Göteborgs Universitet; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; University of Missouri; University of East Anglia; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; University College London; London School of Economics and Political Science; Saint Louis University; York University; Tulane University; University of Otago; Queen Mary University of London; Florida State University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Environmental science; Geography; Mathematics; Physics; Engineering; Meteorology; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.027333704281530893,"score_gpt":0.3267205375188658,"score_spread":0.29938683323733495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243807325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020405442,0.0005428667,0.000019111572,0.059898105,0.00030421498,0.00010367014,0.000014153798,0.000024114066,0.9186883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7189509,0.00008656863,0.000091941045,0.00069592247,0.00032472375,0.0000034815914,3.0647058e-7,0.000003943543,0.2798422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993602,0.000040626004,0.0000771819,0.00014818303,0.00013340752,0.00024040489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957705,0.000032273907,0.0000465489,0.00023871716,0.00001910652,0.000086289],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020377332,0.00006839539,0.00011185097,0.000013760309,0.0016654191,0.00009304276,0.00018121002,0.000054995435,0.007667547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016194842,0.000055794415,0.000030838415,0.000009734888,0.0008476601,0.00015973026,0.00013141388,0.000060534265,0.0082798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005185634,0.000010445488,0.17190614,0.0000074435793,0.000021737009,0.0000029072717,0.016134158,2.7439695e-8,9.738126e-7,0.0023889807,0.8069151,0.0026068885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006821349,0.000006454723,0.3138055,0.0000057695606,0.000008296264,2.7557314e-7,0.001460832,0.000005011611,0.0000016069241,0.0018913051,0.6826916,0.00005514637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011180934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007448309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69854546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002434138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028574555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253191964","doi":"10.1017/s095382081500045x","title":"UTI volume 27 issue 4 Cover and Front matter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Göteborgs Universitet; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; University of Missouri; University of East Anglia; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; University College London; London School of Economics and Political Science; Saint Louis University; York University; Tulane University; University of Otago; Queen Mary University of London; Florida State University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Physics; Engineering; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.0357382874893012,"score_gpt":0.317089383584607,"score_spread":0.2813510960953058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253191964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013127532,0.0015303346,0.00007302097,0.041334637,0.0004491059,0.00012110156,0.000012332168,0.000042372427,0.94330955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6987906,0.000039649556,0.0001616661,0.0012847865,0.00030773302,0.0000029299065,6.2900403e-7,0.0000045136762,0.29940748],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992948,0.00007184942,0.00008550819,0.00013511488,0.00017729867,0.00023541226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996526,0.00003559327,0.000021966322,0.00010108255,0.00003182583,0.00015693618],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028010466,0.000067242145,0.00010793755,0.000019658446,0.00023360358,0.000026505484,0.00008222283,0.000052800853,0.004123006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012314963,0.00005453136,0.000023343255,0.00004094754,0.00043471917,0.00009990284,0.00007161793,0.00005541853,0.013552204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005442535,0.000009420705,0.05356829,0.0000034413188,0.000012474745,0.0000017012449,0.034767948,1.5616938e-7,2.456883e-7,0.0011893184,0.90984875,0.0005927825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011852116,0.000016493825,0.03181887,0.0000046103883,0.000010352532,6.188018e-7,0.009959329,0.00001129254,0.0000010207615,0.003915153,0.9540698,0.000073952935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053556305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002965366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6856631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044848523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005815126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99678737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256529887","doi":"10.1017/s095382080000409x","title":"Feeling Utilitarian","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Normative; Mill; Alienation; Philosophy; Feeling; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07949601172552787,"score_gpt":0.35299652292298844,"score_spread":0.27350051119746055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256529887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023378696,0.00032649408,0.00013229888,0.004969237,0.0004318458,0.000079867,0.0000047120843,0.00009428994,0.97058254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964586,0.000010865084,0.00047741557,0.00090110634,0.00017533313,0.0000032945557,9.452619e-7,0.0000054843495,0.001966979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880433,0.0002723492,0.0001224829,0.00015360268,0.00024844916,0.0003987934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992632,0.00029681128,0.000013534445,0.0001630168,0.000053337102,0.00021010179],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001132241,0.00006394985,0.00008377956,0.000027896753,0.00051763555,0.000027891594,0.00013282051,0.00012507557,0.0009552057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024639673,0.000064283595,0.000060350332,0.00015361757,0.00039575167,0.00011300697,0.0000117426125,0.00019156907,0.000370627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016766919,0.000020045305,0.00044869035,0.0000032842106,0.000003965007,0.0000022663628,0.0034845376,4.788623e-7,0.0000036790886,0.9950151,0.0006245283,0.00039174638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005443817,0.000008056544,0.0003140369,0.0000044719145,0.000004461941,3.13049e-7,0.001721415,0.0000051381962,0.000027816157,0.55274546,0.44505236,0.00006200422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007896493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023435427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97307986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056374414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018922398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282937470","doi":"10.1017/s0953820822000139","title":"Clifford's Consequentialism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Argument (complex analysis); Proposition; Counterexample; Consequentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08721855486844853,"score_gpt":0.2675061887832756,"score_spread":0.18028763391482705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282937470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18736501,0.00158505,0.000030179506,0.0041975677,0.006838063,0.00028707247,0.00041513646,0.00024867008,0.7990333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598631,0.00000733484,0.000035154662,0.0025045478,0.00047192688,0.000040741237,0.00005482558,0.0000148625295,0.037007477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991184,0.00015225094,0.00017315931,0.00017371438,0.00017895944,0.00020353588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951065,0.00010314699,0.00005449142,0.00023581015,0.000053086085,0.000042821965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037938275,0.000089392226,0.0001418109,0.000045848992,0.0007729036,0.000042535055,0.00017146903,0.000022229427,0.012664438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031366686,0.00008845227,0.000107189284,0.000022028178,0.00048338962,0.00006490779,0.00010774974,0.0002790102,0.00016947504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012731408,0.000055939934,0.00005401483,0.000014174555,0.00003263023,0.000015572114,0.022303874,0.0000022446102,0.00002823967,0.93383086,0.042863816,0.0007859144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016671223,0.00007395998,0.000029254295,0.0000018118192,0.000023396036,0.0000070923475,0.008445852,0.000017288005,0.000033483702,0.06780052,0.92329925,0.000101396705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000473019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028979642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8804354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030890882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005578368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286492816","doi":"10.1017/s0953820822000152","title":"The Decline of Egoism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.039614504713568574,"score_gpt":0.24350493654294622,"score_spread":0.20389043182937766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286492816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08710302,0.0028167004,0.0000054683005,0.03369614,0.0012050271,0.0001363578,0.00016970118,0.00004805421,0.8748195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996831,0.000012504717,0.0000026319778,0.0010534097,0.00015366175,0.000012023833,0.00000408572,0.000005071913,0.0019256091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994843,0.000069297836,0.00012346974,0.00006309382,0.00017287594,0.000086975386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994341,0.0003111512,0.000034947323,0.00016608715,0.00003524204,0.00001848506],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005507867,0.0000378754,0.00005958682,0.000014405932,0.000634044,0.000016617381,0.00019566731,0.000008444942,0.0032202313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006365064,0.000024527202,0.000054261232,0.000015854097,0.00033765507,0.000017439274,0.00019113091,0.00017791377,0.000017929971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018120416,0.000028589824,0.000003126227,0.0000033327217,0.000010899223,8.646223e-7,0.0032544609,0.0000018713702,0.000010272922,0.9935558,0.0010908677,0.0020217982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041531184,0.000034144712,0.000011594269,6.806663e-7,0.0000026539653,2.9470573e-7,0.000788696,0.00002978591,0.000008932749,0.5221672,0.476897,0.000017450486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008466786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011565218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.909728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073011215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019507268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323544903","doi":"10.1017/s0953820823000031","title":"Helen McCabe, <i>John Stuart Mill, Socialist</i> (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2021), pp. 368.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Mill; Economic history; Media studies; Art; Art history; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.01930532443906563,"score_gpt":0.27295858244113397,"score_spread":0.25365325800206834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323544903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11849405,0.00024854275,0.000006900343,0.006522977,0.00049958023,0.0004100985,0.00056299905,0.00042660136,0.87282825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738599,0.0016796329,0.000043376444,0.0006919494,0.00031267368,0.0000041889093,0.000015307856,0.000013734718,0.023379227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981708,0.00040590682,0.00014482139,0.00034630293,0.0003211047,0.00061108934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897105,0.0004185004,0.00004688539,0.00019976724,0.000074703916,0.00028908285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000787008,0.00013674477,0.00020279903,0.000038057045,0.0011026777,0.00004387555,0.00029871304,0.00015461,0.00019456873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004259176,0.00014606475,0.000083511695,0.00036919696,0.0009328727,0.0003791321,0.00022867127,0.00016548605,0.00014507942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048858015,0.000040084862,0.00056126434,0.000019150284,0.00003417866,0.000049718226,0.0023479527,0.0000015565006,0.000040365125,0.94661677,0.044685915,0.005554175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002611724,0.000038745555,0.007933561,0.000021664273,0.000030539893,4.4776476e-7,0.0037633642,0.000014398224,0.00009890869,0.04156157,0.94607985,0.00019578659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015058365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021218562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9050552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117330026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088550005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99150044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403305789","doi":"10.1017/s0953820824000116","title":"Jeff Sebo, Saving Animals, Saving Ourselves: Why Animals Matter for Pandemics, Climate Change, and Other Catastrophes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. xvii + 255.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Pandemic; Economic history; Climate change; History; Political science; Philosophy; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Biology; Ecology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.05681980759642018,"score_gpt":0.2542892514322731,"score_spread":0.1974694438358529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403305789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7273224,0.1000254,0.00032446798,0.009127548,0.0050168233,0.003393294,0.0065420116,0.0010534454,0.14719464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794386,0.0023256347,0.00058803946,0.0029973576,0.0022390434,0.000045511246,0.000071608614,0.000095188996,0.012199007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851334,0.000038524613,0.00022482133,0.0004916597,0.00019996219,0.0005317067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993884,0.0001180208,0.000069263784,0.00021565458,0.00005996556,0.00014868616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047119716,0.00023596559,0.00028698155,0.00011850172,0.0006235675,0.00015756648,0.00022197353,0.00007075615,0.0005936887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023351888,0.0002065659,0.000099446166,0.00005311201,0.00053464767,0.0004804419,0.000107090804,0.00017065504,0.000017155964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003812384,0.00014000338,0.014451273,0.0024872592,0.00025689453,0.00010260926,0.12793338,0.0000022247232,0.0020582585,0.18397936,0.6421183,0.026089216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028204688,0.00016444603,0.0010628065,0.00035047246,0.00011429278,0.000007742274,0.0148857115,0.0002451476,0.000018583502,0.00019191789,0.9824441,0.00023271368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051913376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010935358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34032583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008080078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037682672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8423513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403515261","doi":"10.1017/s0953820824000165","title":"Intuition and Kagan's Hierarchicalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04574917801499246,"score_gpt":0.3634780149275634,"score_spread":0.3177288369125709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403515261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038176488,0.002451716,0.0007234049,0.069827996,0.00077951164,0.00012480635,0.000032543954,0.000340544,0.88754296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979421,0.00006713683,0.00007470189,0.0008058297,0.00043223266,0.000003018595,0.0000025263703,0.0000037523685,0.00066869444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993907,0.00009302543,0.00006514974,0.00012490714,0.00015100186,0.00017518652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947125,0.00032671646,0.0000032647285,0.00005827216,0.000015087122,0.00012542635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045025098,0.000039555867,0.00004730185,0.000032448057,0.00019711818,0.000072947,0.000053758067,0.00008906924,0.00018975545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003110044,0.000035739216,0.000025317255,0.000103768856,0.0005298322,0.00011880864,0.00002336605,0.0001970053,0.000112995454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013777574,0.0000051075053,0.000011153359,0.000017676952,0.000003726441,0.0000063375155,0.0054757055,2.8801738e-8,0.0000103338,0.9858279,0.0014296805,0.00721092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015416712,0.000009249339,0.00016866629,0.000018015258,0.0000045944703,5.724761e-7,0.000181822,0.000046958114,0.00000922068,0.7261504,0.27336097,0.000034141427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036415228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000064027605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026703145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006695991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2077689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}