{"meta":{"query_hash":"48af24b5c4b5","filters":{"venue":"Utilitas"},"cohort_total":54,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":54,"exported":54,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48af24b5c4b5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Utilitas"},"results":[{"id":"W1977216584","doi":"10.1017/s095382081000004x","title":"Mill on the Harm in Not Voting","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Harm; Duty; Voting; Obligation; Morality; Harm principle; Law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Moral obligation; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04658484643245275,"score_gpt":0.34700163341908685,"score_spread":0.3004167869866341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977216584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030439263,0.0059016505,0.008978061,0.3494435,0.0018420792,0.00004143046,0.000063932544,0.000042653897,0.6032474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87986153,0.0018241438,0.001363932,0.052363202,0.0011954234,0.0000903471,0.000020065332,0.0000833799,0.063197926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98321277,0.010696913,0.0003748719,0.0013581428,0.0031234708,0.0012338571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835069,0.0126693165,0.00073021377,0.0009798284,0.0015344265,0.0005792428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009806256,0.0003221563,0.0006455797,0.00081595633,0.010197342,0.009452648,0.0010252851,0.007065973,0.004604825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024840273,0.00031090353,0.00039707017,0.00092683197,0.027880695,0.006822691,0.004206652,0.008866317,0.0008345069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011424926,0.000007967681,0.0002727206,0.0000134149095,0.0000040964774,0.000039141214,0.0049783858,0.00009312867,0.000028040567,0.97419024,0.016700469,0.003660952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000170274,0.000021155403,0.00060491165,0.0001315736,0.0000102633785,0.000055012057,0.0046884343,0.00048511362,0.00019006646,0.8126389,0.18113558,0.000021970674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064122705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005950113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010197342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033503852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002399625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051861107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990365400","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808003166","title":"Nozick, Ramsey, and Symbolic Utility","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Rationality; Mathematical economics; Normative; Value (mathematics); Decision theory; The Symbolic; Economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.08805860237501995,"score_gpt":0.20843380836933137,"score_spread":0.12037520599431142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990365400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04052703,0.028436158,0.10380617,0.07240352,0.00095824036,0.00005959853,0.00008532798,0.00006187204,0.75366205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94874513,0.008228839,0.010091535,0.0033549126,0.000574734,0.00012818829,0.000026396094,0.000035531277,0.02881462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988098,0.000682133,0.000028102655,0.00013445529,0.00020718921,0.00013832809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760264,0.0016816121,0.00023774052,0.00017888662,0.00018086207,0.00011824168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020360297,0.00042015346,0.00049053045,0.001126642,0.002124666,0.0030763538,0.0009293589,0.0014730253,0.0046313377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006188469,0.00018451571,0.00032543892,0.0012775827,0.016082006,0.006079844,0.0020938215,0.0029570956,0.0005379059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023228895,0.0000026877922,0.0000249747,0.000005298478,4.983071e-7,0.0000071019494,0.000112906266,0.00010934821,0.0000059796885,0.9983872,0.00042160565,0.0009199533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015609603,0.0000026489217,0.000048910024,0.000020050995,8.632758e-7,0.0000144757105,0.00007154037,0.00038601639,0.000024861562,0.99085766,0.008568903,0.000002470162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026502223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002397845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046313377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042004525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001326384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03047663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992103826","doi":"10.1017/s0953820812000374","title":"Playing Dice with Morality: Weighted Lotteries and the Number Problem","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Lottery; Dice; Morality; Outcome (game theory); Action (physics); Economics; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.028476265113334016,"score_gpt":0.22992297309469634,"score_spread":0.20144670798136233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992103826","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08382603,0.0027602208,0.59530103,0.048228253,0.0010649808,0.00024212478,0.00010475203,0.0001851721,0.26828736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88432884,0.000747062,0.09304014,0.0032489041,0.00058177917,0.00038845115,0.000039464474,0.00011155829,0.017513804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856161,0.010821024,0.00038366398,0.0009938432,0.00160791,0.00057749037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98201054,0.01379374,0.0011272636,0.0016773626,0.00084282784,0.00054831617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017890982,0.00080938404,0.0010684091,0.0011099629,0.003425581,0.005964381,0.0026391854,0.005012027,0.007909226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032368332,0.0005599436,0.0014369915,0.0008907363,0.025003448,0.013227179,0.004194172,0.0062655695,0.0006782357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013661034,0.000011119515,0.000055537057,0.000017867867,0.0000052811074,0.000016739079,0.00014868543,0.001339491,0.00003070712,0.9954861,0.000473527,0.0024012418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009654467,0.000006304856,0.000023995035,0.000011452364,0.0000019450042,0.000010758163,0.00004052201,0.0025546432,0.000033164564,0.9956012,0.0017018899,0.000004526508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010424525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095384836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017890982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036596449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023969852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094617665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992982628","doi":"10.1017/s0953820807002877","title":"Beccaria's Luxury of Comfort and Happiness of the Greatest Number","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Luxury goods; Sociology; Distributive property; Section (typography); Class (philosophy); Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Advertising; Social psychology; Philosophy; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12095805951271647,"score_gpt":0.20842195882817086,"score_spread":0.08746389931545438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992982628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022806168,0.013538809,0.011074493,0.03522213,0.0008502136,0.000050555576,0.00010960391,0.00003988321,0.91630805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87788546,0.010301621,0.010022711,0.009784846,0.0010978889,0.0002274732,0.00010091801,0.000036604986,0.09054245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993605,0.00017790022,0.000018674486,0.00010337417,0.00020517377,0.00013435556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963725,0.00014028221,0.000037014768,0.000028669921,0.00010089705,0.000055807912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006689716,0.0002892182,0.0002845643,0.0008808366,0.0032257435,0.0030194332,0.00039814838,0.0015980827,0.0051783714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016705347,0.00010731886,0.00020254597,0.00087940134,0.009558,0.00347793,0.0022437742,0.001997105,0.00068866287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008037551,0.000005289651,0.0001586071,0.000022079617,9.829606e-7,0.000028506576,0.0014951243,0.00005347808,0.00007232341,0.97810113,0.011221193,0.008833348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042475494,0.00002685087,0.0017713128,0.00015189064,0.0000047364333,0.000295793,0.001834736,0.0003446558,0.00018321157,0.5891297,0.40623823,0.000014554998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003948575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005304765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051783714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020579915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013312503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017323375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003018970","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808003208","title":"Benefit versus Numbers versus Helping the Worst-off: An Alternative to the Prevalent Approach to the Just Distribution of Resources","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"sort; Metric (unit); Distribution (mathematics); Aggregate (composite); Characterization (materials science); Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Operations management","score_opus":0.1623778619965742,"score_gpt":0.3084663210537725,"score_spread":0.14608845905719828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003018970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029592866,0.0062059946,0.25880793,0.15219375,0.0014866628,0.00010202956,0.000120362914,0.0001232747,0.5513671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9219748,0.0019773464,0.040856272,0.011769562,0.0013053915,0.00031257444,0.000035499786,0.00016270428,0.02160584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877538,0.007839443,0.00037111426,0.0011440917,0.0021855198,0.00070592004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99071866,0.005203288,0.00093098904,0.0012130812,0.0012071332,0.0007268599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012472445,0.0010615244,0.0010153591,0.0025804501,0.005740397,0.0113813775,0.00269573,0.007276852,0.0060055763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016521094,0.00043604666,0.0008214473,0.0020534475,0.0642552,0.019779209,0.007898132,0.008132913,0.0008830922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065158606,0.0000031922252,0.000033344455,0.000012490251,0.000001921639,0.00000599896,0.0005633771,0.000052048417,0.000025180543,0.99801314,0.0003709619,0.00091185194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007633393,0.000010956385,0.00008590646,0.00004927062,0.000004608701,0.00001999021,0.00070839556,0.00021665123,0.00006265195,0.98513967,0.013687662,0.000006653837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021835163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003432475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012472445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063479654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036344614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06596142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008321645","doi":"10.1017/s0953820804001426","title":"Teleological Egalitarianism vs. the Slogan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Egalitarianism; Teleology; Virtue; Autonomy; Individualism; Epistemology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0670312286759142,"score_gpt":0.35284510459083585,"score_spread":0.28581387591492163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008321645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0631246,0.0051371497,0.09799704,0.09252248,0.0012899904,0.00009681583,0.00019870223,0.00023695201,0.7393963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95446664,0.001295348,0.011631602,0.01119128,0.00058357854,0.00021537929,0.00007158829,0.00011237186,0.02043215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945393,0.0025834308,0.00029251823,0.0008578031,0.0011196922,0.00060733623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997741,0.00095119467,0.00029018597,0.000532186,0.00034177868,0.00014365137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049255104,0.00049934484,0.0007066611,0.0011173977,0.0018428216,0.0041783075,0.0009263363,0.0030539974,0.0039705816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003957125,0.00040106793,0.00077903416,0.0009355708,0.036528345,0.0067368485,0.0040320815,0.0054568416,0.0009466273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007849606,0.0000029676119,0.000063599364,0.000023100623,0.0000039118345,0.000013403497,0.00034582685,0.00009474128,0.00006863824,0.99756134,0.00065595424,0.001158661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001366712,0.000018037521,0.00023492394,0.000040301093,0.0000069758034,0.00007040832,0.00030152488,0.00025791532,0.0001590562,0.98394185,0.014947136,0.0000082553115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012041499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010274623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049255104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030949868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015939244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02604884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010820112","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000211","title":"Varouxakis Georgios Liberty Abroad: J. S. Mill on International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 278.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.014160944329353593,"score_gpt":0.27697239383707295,"score_spread":0.26281144950771934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010820112","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002438268,0.8592967,0.0019827383,0.0777066,0.003331489,0.000009116244,0.00010116976,0.00004546959,0.055088393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1328901,0.6929254,0.0027790205,0.009728969,0.0088012265,0.00007947792,0.00022068505,0.00016605745,0.1524091],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944645,0.00029131028,0.000022590835,0.000075973556,0.00009656886,0.000067031586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954057,0.00030350345,0.000046642537,0.000023756475,0.000041167394,0.00004446258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013806794,0.001275989,0.0006820754,0.002115941,0.0021236956,0.0052899783,0.0009774705,0.0026183422,0.012816894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001827369,0.00064039964,0.00042134873,0.0025861054,0.0035653522,0.007901731,0.0019428668,0.0037795855,0.0031773793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006476788,0.00006189573,0.00074364216,0.0005930987,0.00003922381,0.00024956104,0.008956657,0.00032023893,0.0001799367,0.41374853,0.46783155,0.107210934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013602167,0.00001665576,0.002148972,0.00096158206,0.000016177793,0.00027854007,0.003465484,0.00022977706,0.00024575987,0.17362134,0.8189807,0.000021478541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043825656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010659534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012816894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002324486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016230042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04287684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020268946","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000089","title":"Sidgwick on Consequentialism and Deontology: A Critique","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Deontological ethics; Prima facie; Philosophy; Duty; Epistemology; Business ethics; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.06786874989644973,"score_gpt":0.5037389770587267,"score_spread":0.43587022716227697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020268946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011509949,0.05185965,0.09820856,0.48589528,0.0038956713,0.00008227935,0.000107794796,0.00011480125,0.34832606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69059634,0.025747303,0.069758095,0.10804257,0.007927755,0.00064848445,0.00008839416,0.0005401198,0.09665089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98359597,0.009948756,0.0005801486,0.001635605,0.0036824918,0.0005570085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787828,0.018106028,0.00050513574,0.001157146,0.0011383268,0.00031054488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017682688,0.000983486,0.0008640947,0.0033943127,0.006488571,0.0076544643,0.0021782801,0.008863632,0.0035505146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02041868,0.0006060665,0.0014328655,0.002423844,0.053136617,0.009853191,0.005218989,0.012843722,0.0008567652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022580932,0.0000018092504,0.000016821286,0.000015720667,0.0000012136277,0.00000946896,0.0006351706,0.00004323887,0.000016355623,0.9953571,0.0023101748,0.0015906577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000912442,0.0000050147114,0.000059814447,0.00010520784,0.0000020550854,0.000034627457,0.00022552907,0.00018042275,0.00007566326,0.9318758,0.06741961,0.0000070784963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006522737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057416707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017682688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011451591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006188161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09351611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020580741","doi":"10.1017/s0953820806002019","title":"Value and Friendship: A More Subtle View","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Teleology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Positive economics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Social science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017217681839704763,"score_gpt":0.217969278428342,"score_spread":0.20075159658863723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020580741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058709756,0.011338094,0.018905167,0.06213962,0.000827861,0.000019976515,0.00008871312,0.00004139459,0.8479295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772256,0.0016559185,0.0012916203,0.0026559676,0.00058604847,0.000029283816,0.000023021197,0.000022175824,0.016510436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977825,0.0012399479,0.000038787726,0.000301958,0.00040739364,0.00022946268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835443,0.00086176605,0.00015715156,0.00020807052,0.00019293379,0.0002257219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016184271,0.00046135514,0.00043945588,0.0017895305,0.0034596699,0.009066323,0.0008627537,0.0034052557,0.0069290507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002751169,0.00015361863,0.0004057325,0.0013981442,0.02491669,0.011410805,0.004827371,0.0036943902,0.0006146585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004709467,0.0000058166906,0.00017990662,0.000013994122,0.000003435843,0.00003623632,0.0025325106,0.000035777255,0.000038041453,0.994412,0.0007598093,0.0019777995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011027029,0.000028109109,0.00072232104,0.00006587797,0.000008909893,0.00021085957,0.004322726,0.00023300927,0.000073555355,0.92114925,0.07316549,0.000008906138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021328318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002138829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009066323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00366975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087358785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02662605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027020936","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800003666","title":"Utility and Humanity: The Quest for the<i>Honestum</i>in Cicero, Hutcheson, and Hume","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cicero; Philosophy; Morality; Humanity; Epistemology; Skepticism; Appeal; Foundation (evidence); Classics; Law; Political science; Theology; History","score_opus":0.060788001840822614,"score_gpt":0.30619604338012535,"score_spread":0.24540804153930273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027020936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058481954,0.08507026,0.015300125,0.3275475,0.0021281077,0.00004292965,0.000046175974,0.000050275263,0.5113327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9304936,0.012357491,0.0021043266,0.017220931,0.0021172692,0.00007390957,0.000015142303,0.000043716867,0.0355736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953075,0.0031536568,0.00006587532,0.00029396758,0.0007931957,0.00038577628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560034,0.00315145,0.0003037482,0.0002608466,0.00042478065,0.00025884088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061323587,0.00041388976,0.0004518007,0.0017529648,0.007855395,0.010495562,0.0010741107,0.003433454,0.0015817139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008155793,0.00031447964,0.00022089492,0.0016274662,0.0557676,0.008684495,0.0038758237,0.005947558,0.00025967715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043475234,0.000004534327,0.000078462086,0.0000144404385,0.000001251516,0.00003121149,0.006751604,0.00005944245,0.000019546877,0.98595583,0.0043578264,0.0027213308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008776636,0.000009715147,0.000400453,0.00014404516,0.0000031966226,0.000041322288,0.0035925435,0.00019384893,0.000103291975,0.89235985,0.103131436,0.000011693686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015271975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013734147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015271975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009384452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055183657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06808931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054837677","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800003423","title":"The ‘Two Hats’ Problem in Consequentialist Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Cognitivism (psychology); Conscience; Philosophy; Epistemology; Deontological ethics; Psychology; Internalism and externalism; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Cognition","score_opus":0.14687427661513056,"score_gpt":0.2983389804075128,"score_spread":0.15146470379238222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054837677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011533327,0.00556798,0.19267128,0.23102243,0.0033366915,0.000061120925,0.00010684807,0.0003340565,0.5553662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8217988,0.0024053138,0.048028328,0.039175436,0.0040367357,0.00027847738,0.00007080294,0.00049074204,0.083715454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891234,0.0053404737,0.000437653,0.0014320922,0.002959372,0.00070694945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98519033,0.008524541,0.00069760275,0.0034658376,0.0015349363,0.0005866443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015867222,0.0006597687,0.00078261417,0.000861801,0.0050124195,0.006453423,0.0021588411,0.007305326,0.013063117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027130485,0.00062945345,0.00090665737,0.0006818469,0.041829947,0.013157926,0.004540584,0.01298193,0.003288711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006027639,0.000003704812,0.000038232156,0.000014267169,0.0000036234794,0.000014603792,0.000311135,0.000045553472,0.000033745422,0.9930514,0.003916862,0.0025608488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008144552,0.0000077667555,0.00005751622,0.000023873059,0.000002237188,0.000054994845,0.00014784162,0.00018085194,0.00007433078,0.97102755,0.02840744,0.0000073979763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015972462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018687272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015867222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031835262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022929225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083914876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071494016","doi":"10.1017/s0953820806002330","title":"Comments on Krister Bykvist ‘Prudence for Changing Selves’","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Section (typography); Reading (process); Epistemology; Welfare; Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06296930381444997,"score_gpt":0.29531400526983864,"score_spread":0.23234470145538866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071494016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039504105,0.0028744757,0.000119239405,0.9795094,0.013332096,0.0000079501915,0.000056403936,0.000028537657,0.003676931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02378952,0.0040361267,0.00040393593,0.914044,0.027199088,0.00007728988,0.000065082255,0.00023957875,0.030145284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912798,0.0035231279,0.00040652772,0.0013464704,0.002649155,0.00079493824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96673477,0.018359909,0.0020735243,0.0006063897,0.010301554,0.0019237779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074219313,0.0013959456,0.001971571,0.0012224732,0.008433848,0.0059328857,0.00366292,0.017976947,0.009899578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047572657,0.0010094008,0.0010232384,0.0017422098,0.008928123,0.008646046,0.004056561,0.035487488,0.0058268695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013305215,0.0000041705566,0.000046307312,0.00003578867,0.0000030532588,0.00011658879,0.0015666921,0.000022741655,0.000038131737,0.005663657,0.9914704,0.001019238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018006274,0.000016681295,0.0009052259,0.0004459,0.000011187335,0.00044205185,0.0074424655,0.00013606925,0.00021503009,0.0069606164,0.98332745,0.00007943718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026810713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022854818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026810713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071600867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043077264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05330932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086941244","doi":"10.1017/s0953820811000161","title":"Degrees of Preference and Degrees of Preference Satisfaction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Preference; Revealed preference; Degree (music); Preference theory; Mathematical economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Physics; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.25027251912779697,"score_gpt":0.25363080181042363,"score_spread":0.0033582826826266676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086941244","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2123931,0.0022196472,0.3958544,0.009944768,0.0005462899,0.0002174099,0.0008049677,0.00022688546,0.37779257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97196925,0.0005941081,0.020312522,0.0004607853,0.00026991777,0.0002503524,0.00020654716,0.000032300937,0.005904175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98233944,0.0079940315,0.0014531199,0.0020430477,0.0047048945,0.001465425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97807467,0.011111082,0.0024316476,0.0033338775,0.0034508775,0.0015979072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00887726,0.0007029072,0.0006589687,0.0024633396,0.001601629,0.006172381,0.0011653434,0.001734909,0.0067510814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028553288,0.0004249654,0.0007850036,0.0027423198,0.012397199,0.009347356,0.004286295,0.0028462776,0.0007680697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027969047,0.000007386554,0.00041813013,0.000026322668,0.000013381905,0.000015617557,0.0006283351,0.00036517082,0.0001991668,0.9930549,0.00037552448,0.004868062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001366825,0.000021693124,0.0005772846,0.000017973362,0.000007692483,0.00007304908,0.00042065093,0.0008383648,0.00015947779,0.99222624,0.0056305425,0.000013393621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057504093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040431976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00887726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016734576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000843727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046948016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091781130","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000132","title":"Ross on Self and Others","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Trilemma; Duty; Pleasure; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.026867533460950277,"score_gpt":0.22846040373200618,"score_spread":0.2015928702710559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091781130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012013347,0.07662728,0.0037342268,0.17723115,0.00280098,0.000021998081,0.00007082023,0.000046524303,0.7274536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.602113,0.035608266,0.002782898,0.02772391,0.0026358191,0.00008061849,0.00007724576,0.00015983773,0.32881847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998281,0.0010889615,0.000032453845,0.00018612406,0.00025544898,0.00015593453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877316,0.00058490585,0.00009001975,0.00014838565,0.00023430899,0.0001691562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015719179,0.00049551256,0.00030563146,0.00089026697,0.0042968006,0.005198506,0.00047572164,0.0025550737,0.007733328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002689099,0.0001624705,0.0003192864,0.00068714353,0.010620211,0.0064224377,0.0024700523,0.0032083169,0.0018652802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079658275,0.0000072332814,0.00013216348,0.000026423448,0.0000025796742,0.0000449637,0.0040289545,0.00004789014,0.00004222072,0.9509808,0.039169263,0.0055095227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006780632,0.000012907764,0.00027111307,0.00023264298,0.0000037474,0.00012250214,0.00372591,0.000102805745,0.00008927465,0.46978065,0.52564263,0.000009046728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053287162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074632536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007733328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030557837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017685445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025870502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098619143","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808002963","title":"Well-Being, Autonomy, and the Horizon Problem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Happiness; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Psychology; Welfare; Task (project management); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.03224788498135521,"score_gpt":0.2941692804513121,"score_spread":0.26192139546995685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098619143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20945254,0.008966034,0.14553887,0.09584234,0.00070638617,0.000082679275,0.00028039984,0.0001126284,0.5390182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98427975,0.0008046618,0.0059077786,0.00069461664,0.00026072768,0.00003607289,0.00003862111,0.000022864142,0.00795484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998483,0.0006066729,0.00005425929,0.0002707622,0.00033935838,0.00024593275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965083,0.0019422453,0.00037953025,0.00035822752,0.00028996237,0.00052168395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031940131,0.000232347,0.00043653784,0.0007116426,0.002606359,0.0031480181,0.00085854344,0.0020375,0.0072647347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009372544,0.00024216471,0.00047023417,0.0005626316,0.009735028,0.0067597674,0.0028225926,0.004184131,0.00040000773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010119896,0.000007562679,0.00021996084,0.0000075771754,0.0000024797155,0.00002038219,0.00017326696,0.00043425916,0.00003555392,0.99505603,0.000515188,0.0035175346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050873036,0.0000033189506,0.00019122308,0.0000065680324,0.0000014416142,0.000015320467,0.000088691784,0.0007076567,0.000022275339,0.9967039,0.0022518751,0.000002538157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003146072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024283575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072647347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002919451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017370955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02430296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098958246","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990331","title":"Moral Schizophrenia and the Paradox of Friendship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Psychology; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Moral psychology; Phenomenon; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05768902164057853,"score_gpt":0.4412399544241247,"score_spread":0.3835509327835462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098958246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1967713,0.0067295353,0.007929535,0.23603266,0.00088974973,0.000019375619,0.00003655086,0.00007799332,0.5515134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914103,0.0006023839,0.00033540634,0.0035786163,0.00020648145,0.000007650491,0.000004746485,0.000011588475,0.0038429615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99415356,0.003922844,0.00011934643,0.00035423128,0.0008423032,0.00060778303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940796,0.0031229157,0.00087555236,0.00041208748,0.00054896576,0.0009610281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053167855,0.00021123663,0.00030742254,0.0011573855,0.008884391,0.0050581265,0.00077643874,0.004017627,0.0056173485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011904018,0.00021071403,0.00024655563,0.0007662895,0.035692096,0.0073746378,0.0057866676,0.0036413025,0.0007775364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001013092,0.0000070893634,0.00024941316,0.000012300336,0.0000024114456,0.00010410632,0.0052605257,0.00004420018,0.000030666717,0.9882832,0.0034166726,0.0025793079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027797762,0.00001632889,0.00056561845,0.00004544627,0.0000049381097,0.00029416752,0.0054609487,0.0003043288,0.00007394908,0.958815,0.03437672,0.000014686551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002944583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00262535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008884391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034965717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020042257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028118134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104059996","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800004052","title":"<i>Principia</i> Then and Now","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02123487866047863,"score_gpt":0.2910164832279981,"score_spread":0.2697816045675195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104059996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007886277,0.014854489,0.084588036,0.15499203,0.008868983,0.00007154497,0.0002818046,0.0005375199,0.7279193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5515768,0.012151853,0.08602905,0.10682768,0.008503601,0.0006115006,0.00038987998,0.00059735856,0.23331223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998492,0.00046861006,0.00009053129,0.0003391707,0.00048308945,0.00012642382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998588,0.00044357183,0.0001806897,0.0003396003,0.00035894162,0.000089159264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019819755,0.0004558466,0.00032540885,0.00065018353,0.0024031377,0.004777103,0.0011931923,0.001912561,0.007271667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003595078,0.00021512288,0.0007641893,0.00055006583,0.010446313,0.004387133,0.0020927577,0.005153801,0.0035510394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008006145,0.000005652345,0.0001255239,0.000035168996,0.0000057200314,0.00001604703,0.0002133766,0.0000519779,0.00008974597,0.9709641,0.023116607,0.0053680716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005765394,0.000019052353,0.00045488004,0.000084312625,0.000007797922,0.00015028559,0.00018617531,0.00026377803,0.00052351924,0.65333694,0.34495512,0.000012302649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029135798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030203979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007271667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024164557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015229413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024326205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111614934","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800003137","title":"Vices as Higher-level Evils","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Selfishness; Virtue; Malice; Feature (linguistics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12209407553739866,"score_gpt":0.3088756553733365,"score_spread":0.18678157983593785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111614934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0742467,0.0023021253,0.1287102,0.0052952417,0.00021407282,0.0000386488,0.000097566335,0.00026138732,0.7888342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762271,0.0006064685,0.007872214,0.00034335212,0.00010382075,0.000030946874,0.000042463293,0.000068620735,0.014705022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975623,0.0010158302,0.000090864494,0.0003436301,0.0006142026,0.00037313678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983606,0.0005115841,0.0001977736,0.0005631419,0.00021922881,0.00014771959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026194481,0.00048809158,0.00044315553,0.0013162751,0.0018577504,0.0071816975,0.0007922642,0.0013517245,0.0051979544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033911804,0.00035472942,0.0007092208,0.00052110525,0.01784582,0.0063950405,0.0037094322,0.0026171794,0.00087054406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002275953,0.0000018932768,0.00010491436,0.0000087247345,0.0000020607788,0.000011416026,0.00037731137,0.000116031304,0.00006453251,0.99772984,0.00012420298,0.0014567932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039600695,0.000008273558,0.00043558632,0.000030137673,0.000005843747,0.000085983134,0.00027536048,0.00049430184,0.00019993584,0.9805444,0.017906895,0.000009235387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008339948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010839129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071816975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002008382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010175785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01738882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121384512","doi":"10.1017/s0953820806002378","title":"Schultz's Sidgwick","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Coherentism; Economic Justice; Internalism and externalism; Epistemology; Foundationalism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11688273653711992,"score_gpt":0.5554238641889074,"score_spread":0.43854112765178754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121384512","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005145959,0.07410433,0.0055201654,0.5892809,0.019327572,0.0000398684,0.00010610474,0.00013024348,0.30634487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14122649,0.029808281,0.003948967,0.08527823,0.0058942293,0.00009823701,0.0000693574,0.00025473768,0.7334215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971324,0.0012295345,0.000083665116,0.00044387748,0.00088759925,0.0002228565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997251,0.0012526705,0.00017267106,0.00021263464,0.0005539883,0.0005571525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023206528,0.0004896547,0.0003892467,0.0008887885,0.0053397017,0.0053533036,0.00068628555,0.0036881454,0.018276803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008919322,0.00026161276,0.0003115554,0.000632752,0.009725058,0.005762388,0.004465511,0.0067053335,0.00486122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019637606,0.000014268199,0.00023605446,0.00008756876,0.00000450223,0.00015180187,0.005497074,0.00007741185,0.00015701195,0.37406507,0.5762778,0.043411855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017687005,0.000004851444,0.000080702164,0.00012973686,8.1664587e-7,0.00012611855,0.001012385,0.000034933393,0.00007983646,0.03231479,0.9662085,0.0000053779463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00857905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012826116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018276803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047393166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005057776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061142027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121478539","doi":"10.1017/s0953820805001792","title":"Utility and Capability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Epistemology; Economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03157079136568135,"score_gpt":0.30939975488992455,"score_spread":0.2778289635242432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121478539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03656614,0.027348962,0.086320415,0.039498534,0.0006702558,0.000054977874,0.00018249465,0.000084921005,0.8092733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568303,0.008084865,0.007922561,0.0021917531,0.0006330286,0.00010206494,0.00006904657,0.000031444524,0.024134926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984611,0.0008186782,0.00006324164,0.0001755977,0.00025842202,0.00022298326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792093,0.0012490437,0.00015822961,0.0002119148,0.00027330476,0.000186695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001973174,0.0006444247,0.00050847704,0.0018152741,0.0016371788,0.0038841667,0.0006828123,0.0017943624,0.0073562064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040480946,0.00019590507,0.00062251877,0.0018111961,0.01445897,0.0056012305,0.003174938,0.0027434337,0.00083435734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003486785,0.0000022610147,0.00010219933,0.000011771482,0.0000025178929,0.000011298779,0.00014543183,0.00013407202,0.000016037728,0.9967114,0.00043708112,0.002422453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031074865,0.000011181656,0.00035303927,0.000043929096,0.0000029587102,0.00006301309,0.00015388941,0.0003169704,0.000053446744,0.9765236,0.022469867,0.0000050444824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017536508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011813905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073562064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023786973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001012329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02460891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122773855","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990240","title":"Rawls and Cohen on Facts and Principles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Primary goods; Positive economics; Economics; Economic Justice; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.1007900615427099,"score_gpt":0.3587296502886735,"score_spread":0.25793958874596357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122773855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011116399,0.079815865,0.0461292,0.15257084,0.003250363,0.00007429119,0.00040948042,0.000121060184,0.7065125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78459597,0.046007156,0.029992895,0.03281879,0.006584302,0.00044575054,0.00032751687,0.00027310988,0.098954566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643457,0.0017760221,0.0001710924,0.0005969949,0.0008091098,0.0002121698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943938,0.004085775,0.0002709138,0.0005276475,0.00058737554,0.00013445987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044467095,0.0008448931,0.0009231287,0.002950901,0.0036476569,0.0055142143,0.0010863427,0.0049713794,0.0051294053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009155454,0.00062696246,0.0009939967,0.0022640075,0.024995178,0.011664346,0.0027577286,0.0064506326,0.0013732675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040711325,0.0000025619615,0.000018143697,0.000016777889,0.0000029072553,0.000012872828,0.00025469117,0.00006769058,0.0000149485295,0.9953317,0.0031208612,0.0011526854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005059608,0.0000023881216,0.000034213597,0.000031380205,0.0000018740183,0.000014886795,0.000048114594,0.000054777083,0.000021077623,0.9763248,0.023457615,0.000003758254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038182593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035171625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055142143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048557417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019687018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035230994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132482899","doi":"10.1017/s0953820811000070","title":"Dead and Gone","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Virtue; Welfare; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.09944507161060448,"score_gpt":0.2089704965621464,"score_spread":0.10952542495154191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132482899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040208034,0.007089556,0.027837388,0.056205582,0.0033549778,0.00003703164,0.00035508716,0.00022248925,0.8646899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71621716,0.003175741,0.0056247385,0.018354049,0.0005188489,0.00006917302,0.00023889318,0.00029950007,0.25550193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988121,0.0004983302,0.000040644474,0.00020962737,0.0002123038,0.00022712645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914825,0.00024322739,0.000086985165,0.00015907688,0.00019883644,0.00016372444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016044932,0.0003427289,0.00037202556,0.0009294372,0.004671158,0.004805915,0.0007226188,0.001864644,0.018062027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028265426,0.00019369903,0.00050250406,0.0006325307,0.015670745,0.0068472754,0.0047527947,0.0042816587,0.0031049778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002236013,0.0000066915227,0.00021499867,0.000034354347,0.000005888753,0.00011200385,0.006847778,0.000043315747,0.00012328109,0.97402936,0.010308501,0.008251388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008684724,0.000031885527,0.00063754275,0.00021432721,0.000013408731,0.00043503495,0.01450712,0.00013816827,0.00038581807,0.44538575,0.538216,0.000026100091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002334305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041655223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018062027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016849283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012910529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060423493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133696524","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990392","title":"On Sidgwick's Demise: A Reply to Professor Deigh","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Philosophy; Suspect; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.03839211748810955,"score_gpt":0.281089518611169,"score_spread":0.24269740112305943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133696524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018609599,0.0031038013,0.00008441329,0.98881054,0.006834145,0.0000021969895,0.000007416756,0.000004687335,0.00096667866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064349743,0.0024944618,0.0002257638,0.97698385,0.009916982,0.000016982838,0.0000074047903,0.00003555686,0.0038839846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865306,0.005562493,0.0010368694,0.002146165,0.003549373,0.0011743947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9438223,0.04342759,0.0013915703,0.0013677819,0.006171544,0.0038191802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020786002,0.0012391183,0.0017400625,0.0014999048,0.012105402,0.009528446,0.0055632764,0.052327156,0.0050149527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060508683,0.0009174245,0.0014594976,0.0021416221,0.029343901,0.019495329,0.009275302,0.08949943,0.0020870455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029145478,0.000011554209,0.00012827986,0.00007567999,0.000008414785,0.00029682633,0.0029569636,0.00004221045,0.00007801542,0.054187823,0.93654066,0.005644338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026538622,0.000018246288,0.00026112693,0.00048275883,0.000007849158,0.0003633083,0.0051539643,0.0001105467,0.00020756567,0.036810096,0.9564915,0.00006660695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038500976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047079425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052327156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010643067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0151701085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10992819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141018876","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990094","title":"Utilitarianism and Psychological Realism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Realism; Flourishing; Normative; Epistemology; Empirical psychology; Value (mathematics); Moral realism; Philosophy; Philosophical realism; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Economics; Theoretical psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1057381843068476,"score_gpt":0.30573340685169004,"score_spread":0.19999522254484242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141018876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034559827,0.016200604,0.13273503,0.12477648,0.0012331693,0.000084696745,0.00010135241,0.000136701,0.6901722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515641,0.002960895,0.012668331,0.00698156,0.0017560615,0.00018984373,0.00005666225,0.00010752277,0.02371514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843919,0.010076971,0.0005536177,0.001170196,0.0029531922,0.00085406966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863963,0.009172293,0.00087350653,0.0015727197,0.0013753147,0.00060980726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013135987,0.0006355982,0.00075307867,0.001919272,0.0033660512,0.008025675,0.0014390273,0.0051006,0.0039392654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014937457,0.0004104966,0.00083092664,0.0012780725,0.049361728,0.008162454,0.0054592565,0.008130444,0.0009547503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021428048,0.000002691914,0.000023089493,0.0000107289,0.0000016075442,0.0000071924583,0.00030243013,0.00008126548,0.000018484898,0.9985537,0.00036308749,0.0006334991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038289686,0.0000030482283,0.00002849126,0.000019524881,0.0000010003505,0.000011210796,0.00008451244,0.00015724191,0.000019367379,0.99312747,0.0065416917,0.0000026167836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097644667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006956543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013135987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061314055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022673125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069470584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144604339","doi":"10.1017/s0953820804001153","title":"The Appeal of Utilitarianism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Welfarism; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Economics; Positive economics; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Philosophy; Welfare; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.048314278732881945,"score_gpt":0.3414845816633871,"score_spread":0.2931703029305051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144604339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014110474,0.027126199,0.07281583,0.26574266,0.0034986946,0.000056402212,0.00009717947,0.00016737198,0.6163852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.868777,0.010266516,0.012501388,0.04270912,0.010283699,0.00024578502,0.00005084187,0.0003468839,0.054818813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716438,0.01704712,0.000596669,0.0021679546,0.007158919,0.0013855239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746698,0.017180538,0.0011874355,0.0025296635,0.0034304266,0.0010021379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020396564,0.0008829983,0.0010725699,0.0022773154,0.004404,0.011699222,0.0015891887,0.008099198,0.005016985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02842065,0.00050729554,0.0010340298,0.0014997042,0.051056765,0.010213387,0.006119245,0.015762057,0.0017854561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000511748,0.0000039074125,0.000035706948,0.000024628716,0.00000603776,0.000011116384,0.00035456088,0.00010706219,0.000025949901,0.99517435,0.0022866423,0.0019649684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007586872,0.0000066104176,0.000052685133,0.000056356253,0.00000266558,0.000017709906,0.00012144021,0.00018881113,0.00003738922,0.9719991,0.027503297,0.000006264081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016935734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010815051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020396564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070346748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003771196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10786861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151151846","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800002880","title":"Sidgwick's Minimal Metaethics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Reputation; Philosophy; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.036410559724372876,"score_gpt":0.3348963710062298,"score_spread":0.2984858112818569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151151846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015322735,0.009395236,0.31735513,0.119209595,0.0019399985,0.00014808972,0.00023328132,0.00027804557,0.536118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7725924,0.0047792117,0.14945829,0.017250774,0.0015211953,0.00075430237,0.00014230529,0.0003255646,0.0531759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99165887,0.0041035367,0.00048945163,0.0015268082,0.0019681496,0.0002532149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991091,0.0047503402,0.00045428466,0.002358078,0.00094344217,0.0004029534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011634178,0.0006841541,0.0009662404,0.0026008512,0.004163098,0.0066561815,0.0019431231,0.004051293,0.0040332633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012652607,0.00046753834,0.001226396,0.0011776396,0.03394492,0.008324524,0.0056701256,0.0085055875,0.0008180521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016320637,0.0000014964879,0.000017452134,0.000008107956,0.0000013013932,0.000003705147,0.00016509982,0.00003622351,0.0000135289865,0.99784636,0.0006895317,0.0012154806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029567764,0.0000043670493,0.000026177771,0.000028634528,0.0000019952113,0.00002216874,0.000059042723,0.00020361552,0.000052674135,0.9830593,0.01653617,0.0000030014205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020418318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022834863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011634178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006774636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004946305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061528206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153480875","doi":"10.1017/s0953820812000386","title":"Aggregation and the Separateness of Persons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.043947020994198525,"score_gpt":0.325211589978441,"score_spread":0.2812645689842425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153480875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21420085,0.0048546568,0.315704,0.030333288,0.00065039634,0.00013031169,0.00015807027,0.00017921533,0.4337893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724467,0.00049040234,0.018781858,0.0010400062,0.00021491376,0.000097896744,0.000049831866,0.00003821507,0.0068401564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98337054,0.009515413,0.00082756655,0.0024633016,0.0027454195,0.001077724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844817,0.0071190367,0.001709206,0.0036532865,0.0019054564,0.0011312907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011582794,0.00055504544,0.0010327479,0.0025741737,0.005579139,0.006876577,0.0009891522,0.002954888,0.0041603176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014034743,0.0006165936,0.0012890465,0.0017099751,0.035946585,0.0130175315,0.010409823,0.004760777,0.00059827435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001673594,0.00000683573,0.00036903739,0.000025724736,0.000012401917,0.000027842034,0.0022347686,0.00015279975,0.00013828119,0.9923017,0.00042647088,0.0042874725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014642329,0.000021064976,0.0006036121,0.000053829634,0.000019712092,0.000098487166,0.0010449522,0.0006911397,0.00025565125,0.98417896,0.013004777,0.000013191682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013201112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001050571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011582794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027257642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020699587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06125641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154724959","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808003257","title":"Defending Limits on the Sacrifices We Ought To Make For Others","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Value (mathematics); Obligation; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Position (finance); Set (abstract data type); Space (punctuation); Law; Sociology; Political science; Business; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.25006695954333685,"score_gpt":0.30003610400269826,"score_spread":0.0499691444593614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154724959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046307094,0.0066015767,0.045152392,0.19239455,0.0007562352,0.000073305746,0.000056766945,0.0000761028,0.70858204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95475006,0.0024044919,0.009666004,0.016563138,0.00064650574,0.00020036964,0.00002908714,0.00009326162,0.01564709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97813696,0.013386648,0.0008935136,0.0019134941,0.0034974697,0.0021718417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716348,0.016516441,0.0029143395,0.0040919073,0.0027920685,0.002050499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029632293,0.00072525075,0.0011733907,0.001502073,0.008327095,0.015712107,0.002827852,0.011879528,0.0043030595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028568119,0.0005990164,0.0007300434,0.00094560784,0.0988873,0.016106373,0.013321431,0.011697011,0.001156846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004730911,0.0000070358324,0.00012122275,0.000019292112,0.0000055002074,0.000018574889,0.002604824,0.000101300764,0.00008013848,0.994241,0.00085464056,0.001941873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007831484,0.000011405809,0.00020014051,0.00019043197,0.0000064609776,0.000044881144,0.002743289,0.00016644514,0.00015947768,0.9718694,0.024586229,0.0000140813145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028705772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003949091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029632293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052656806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006617314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15671235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156642301","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000181","title":"On the Equivalence of Trolleys and Transplants: The Lack of Intrinsic Difference between ‘Collateral Damage’ and Intended Harm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral damage; Collateral; Harm; Scrutiny; Illusion; Law and economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.17015251227983363,"score_gpt":0.30819701557935225,"score_spread":0.13804450329951862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156642301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2100029,0.002577494,0.08133402,0.02406956,0.00078760105,0.000075220276,0.000091961985,0.0000927562,0.68096846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98474044,0.00062970415,0.0042175823,0.002572965,0.00017817691,0.000051687883,0.00003745567,0.000046405243,0.007525526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948665,0.0015476197,0.0002646621,0.001154474,0.0016393525,0.00052732223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922752,0.0043442384,0.0007694495,0.0016651484,0.00063660584,0.00030937424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060590897,0.0003006043,0.0007154912,0.0007796205,0.0020181437,0.0053768917,0.001694663,0.0041799885,0.008533746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020093715,0.00028777722,0.00076220965,0.00038313598,0.046195786,0.015491935,0.005455054,0.006440497,0.0007962488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005033208,0.000011371759,0.0002708766,0.000029996017,0.0000070362225,0.00008754771,0.0014675919,0.00012906916,0.0004770605,0.9932499,0.00029998893,0.003919308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012457452,0.000034504777,0.0009280744,0.00003693743,0.000008602535,0.00019692045,0.0006735103,0.0003010067,0.0005404159,0.9917378,0.005515715,0.000014057221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010660986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009301658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008533746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018790755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012127177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032043934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261960870","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000217","title":"Huei-chun Su, Economic Justice and Liberty: The Social Philosophy in John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism (London and New York: Routledge, 2013), pp. xx + 214.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Mill; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.083299977522055,"score_gpt":0.32439919064092054,"score_spread":0.24109921311886556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261960870","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00871706,0.5516653,0.02497437,0.22582933,0.0037848598,0.00011743206,0.00053308613,0.00014135524,0.18423714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43230456,0.43908536,0.017362608,0.029608496,0.0046216245,0.00057015725,0.0003747347,0.00023666452,0.0758358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990484,0.0004884946,0.000057571877,0.000088964276,0.00019882416,0.00011784728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997865,0.0016240835,0.0001362622,0.000085726824,0.00018147557,0.00010749078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028380153,0.0008611283,0.0006053339,0.0016909812,0.0029530327,0.004947333,0.0012278827,0.004321135,0.007260183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038065712,0.00049465836,0.00057385094,0.0031309803,0.010680568,0.007414818,0.0018035587,0.004406434,0.0010155143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004148689,0.000030416524,0.00049201935,0.00029250295,0.000034910146,0.00018491894,0.008206218,0.00044472655,0.00016440383,0.8512883,0.109003425,0.029816583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025577496,0.000018994007,0.0036568341,0.0005706697,0.000029248884,0.000108559056,0.0035725702,0.00048954086,0.00037813094,0.76296836,0.22813614,0.000045310804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117897475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031516172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117897475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040786783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032488373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02959299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271845555","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000291","title":"Mill on Mental Health Acts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Legislature; Mental health; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Test (biology); Social psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry; Political science; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12240077137454458,"score_gpt":0.4199633537737443,"score_spread":0.2975625823991997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271845555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021469036,0.008245359,0.009011453,0.14650354,0.0019615998,0.00008431962,0.00009479893,0.00006677474,0.812563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8334152,0.0036309932,0.0036100454,0.06577046,0.0021323464,0.0002707087,0.00005073715,0.00009644623,0.091023065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983383,0.008921384,0.00065629167,0.0014698246,0.003915927,0.0016536118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98410285,0.012147435,0.0008502728,0.0010842928,0.0014906387,0.00032445902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013288911,0.0005931539,0.00074041844,0.0014620591,0.011322137,0.01233434,0.0013075897,0.011343133,0.0049858307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030300312,0.00052186655,0.0006128796,0.0012915295,0.029176442,0.007602203,0.005035901,0.0117671685,0.0009373257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003677828,0.000003114838,0.000065640794,0.000010139432,0.0000011267196,0.000015057797,0.0016559875,0.00003717494,0.000018616627,0.99073654,0.0058410596,0.0016119702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001920013,0.0000321226,0.00068260456,0.00044704165,0.000017587872,0.00006645435,0.0039907,0.0005983088,0.00043389422,0.63253677,0.36113882,0.000036534333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055379346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046113515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013288911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005701756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004385802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07027936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331076044","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000539","title":"Human Rights, Categorical Duties: A Dilemma for Instrumentalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Dilemma; Categorical variable; Normative; Human rights; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.07670098403710218,"score_gpt":0.3681353748928335,"score_spread":0.2914343908557313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331076044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028998883,0.009891056,0.13330396,0.4446233,0.0012182676,0.00008017961,0.00010263475,0.00019859584,0.38158312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9270191,0.0034956648,0.023785105,0.023510898,0.002077006,0.00031763906,0.00004945402,0.0002290891,0.019516027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868242,0.008429945,0.00036045746,0.0012103874,0.0025269876,0.00064799545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97495663,0.018094447,0.00092322123,0.0029619809,0.0019949358,0.0010688086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019421047,0.00067269185,0.0010794074,0.0018348371,0.0060231276,0.009088086,0.0027758016,0.008534634,0.004706049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02382844,0.0006440661,0.0010583452,0.0012045967,0.072922766,0.021449408,0.008562069,0.015683025,0.0012177443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027499461,0.00000412254,0.000022996774,0.0000070590895,0.000001020086,0.000007454768,0.00034098924,0.000028819888,0.000013482527,0.99821174,0.0005955494,0.000763929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059843305,0.0000027453816,0.000019125255,0.000018648148,0.0000010038239,0.0000133297735,0.0001874235,0.00009777139,0.0000257867,0.99345386,0.0061715418,0.0000027231495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001473957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011973748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019421047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061043105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004596994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10270953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468793022","doi":"10.1017/s0953820816000170","title":"Effort and Achievement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Competence (human resources); Distributive justice; Epistemology; Distributive property; Positive economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05411237397655988,"score_gpt":0.25748381885523397,"score_spread":0.2033714448786741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468793022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08307832,0.01391718,0.018898172,0.015867656,0.00039441275,0.000035883757,0.00008132057,0.00005896218,0.86766815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97146446,0.0038790167,0.00197731,0.00054247165,0.00026449503,0.00003344444,0.000040340426,0.0000334874,0.021765044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965233,0.0017598001,0.00012302169,0.0003943493,0.00068630965,0.0005131014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964057,0.0016024939,0.0005586336,0.0003166525,0.00044506224,0.00067147944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002764046,0.00051928184,0.00031275235,0.0015881903,0.0020313011,0.007943602,0.00071333535,0.0015719539,0.00614186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057075303,0.000104973326,0.0002589256,0.0015519062,0.01681382,0.0055712587,0.0060680793,0.0016998159,0.00087708666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001199946,0.000016386512,0.0010081616,0.000051346655,0.0000058683777,0.0000348311,0.003260703,0.00013815305,0.00006793023,0.98039037,0.0006505566,0.014363673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008681974,0.00006091361,0.0049599647,0.00022836713,0.000010753809,0.00013105695,0.004659656,0.0003103504,0.00021847061,0.8937062,0.09568991,0.000015692818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010588564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010492972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007943602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002175371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001218386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020546615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483301427","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000369","title":"Value and Preference Relations: Are They Symmetric?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Value (mathematics); Dilemma; Relation (database); Preference relation; Symmetry (geometry); Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Positive economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.1859911685268948,"score_gpt":0.26814648802992597,"score_spread":0.08215531950303118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483301427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1546749,0.0061500273,0.33346933,0.040941462,0.0008924854,0.00020058328,0.00060160435,0.00022481922,0.4628448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97615474,0.0010288092,0.015056424,0.0016213668,0.00038378008,0.00016247449,0.00012965337,0.00005845853,0.0054042647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98787874,0.0068025556,0.0005685087,0.0015049357,0.0023716185,0.00087357993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98627484,0.006805373,0.0018853727,0.0025854053,0.0018716401,0.0005772831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01056171,0.00068861037,0.0013226866,0.0021281596,0.0017667313,0.0071703545,0.0015884361,0.0030948236,0.010671937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024427952,0.0006744055,0.0011723852,0.0021471984,0.021126937,0.028200394,0.003726671,0.004013439,0.0016254808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015932326,0.0000076279116,0.000170009,0.000023323095,0.0000101132955,0.000015419448,0.0003534743,0.00007889666,0.000071906965,0.99306315,0.0003274604,0.005862666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009094885,0.0000075959883,0.00022784532,0.000013626607,0.0000035502,0.000031722928,0.0002071414,0.000348826,0.00006662815,0.9974638,0.0016141839,0.0000059242984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015995471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009051817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010671937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003127107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015359743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055856287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598556056","doi":"10.1017/s0953820817000048","title":"Prichard's Arguments against Ideal Utilitarianism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Ideal (ethics); Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.044302715380062044,"score_gpt":0.2478539746170053,"score_spread":0.20355125923694328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598556056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014604077,0.011716595,0.14988005,0.2727929,0.004499979,0.00009009347,0.00016576164,0.00019034957,0.5460602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79739344,0.008403034,0.048394408,0.080840416,0.0056990143,0.0005504496,0.00009381236,0.00037406286,0.058251366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98320884,0.00950246,0.00059145264,0.0016685728,0.0039181164,0.0011105809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97634107,0.016753308,0.0011107259,0.002483597,0.0026942294,0.0006170844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016202096,0.0006901941,0.0011589277,0.0020306616,0.004103071,0.0076585324,0.002377807,0.0065460657,0.006091139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035783354,0.00056408864,0.0017253974,0.0021783123,0.028621543,0.009126422,0.006467502,0.015165906,0.002060197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005341229,0.000003902535,0.00002771272,0.000014912428,0.0000039802044,0.00001252216,0.00016182032,0.00014912264,0.000010359131,0.99472684,0.0039054602,0.0009780566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000816059,0.0000067036603,0.000052566196,0.000046602967,0.0000047565363,0.000029837138,0.0000931111,0.00033368557,0.000058372447,0.97580546,0.023552798,0.000008046541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001013251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081367587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016202096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038167196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019892913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08568585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801048049","doi":"10.1017/s0953820818000067","title":"Scales for Scope: A New Solution to the Scope Problem for Pro-Attitude-Based Well-Being","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Limiting; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Tone (literature); Wish; Well-being; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07859569776412613,"score_gpt":0.3805006486859248,"score_spread":0.3019049509217987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801048049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020357776,0.0034948976,0.8855734,0.015725141,0.00145302,0.0004759467,0.00060482806,0.0005047286,0.07181028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5054473,0.002095451,0.47120655,0.00334955,0.0020767325,0.002554846,0.0005304397,0.00053417747,0.012204913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97727066,0.01173557,0.0017505352,0.0040754983,0.004505043,0.0006626747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93125397,0.041090727,0.005636066,0.013394762,0.0069810506,0.0016434345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022936024,0.0024024553,0.0022913236,0.0050993683,0.0032220706,0.007088057,0.0036091185,0.003368725,0.014095519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115832,0.0015899598,0.0032124277,0.0050290725,0.014376402,0.018201193,0.008764503,0.009646062,0.0020790268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005430421,0.00004277274,0.0028266013,0.00019551371,0.00008737537,0.000097161224,0.0018170266,0.00084968033,0.0003273308,0.9513579,0.0037219536,0.03862233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046403853,0.00007784386,0.0027817725,0.00015623454,0.00004696303,0.00018838134,0.0006264216,0.007480312,0.00014666244,0.9714083,0.01697245,0.00006824556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025711078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018871749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022936024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029674468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028591745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12129879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895769854","doi":"10.1017/s0953820818000237","title":"On Two Interpretations of the Desire-Satisfaction Theory of Prudential Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Object (grammar); Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Epistemology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.030350179224699424,"score_gpt":0.2904351899425258,"score_spread":0.2600850107178264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895769854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039659645,0.0027643356,0.3913569,0.025471305,0.0006676308,0.00016293,0.00026324484,0.00016976295,0.53948426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93350464,0.0011985628,0.040075574,0.0029014589,0.0007647968,0.00048552908,0.00026056808,0.00013794447,0.020670941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931544,0.003554391,0.00027218016,0.0007029423,0.0017558037,0.00056033616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943294,0.0030642059,0.00048030898,0.0008197961,0.00081193337,0.00049434067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009528154,0.0010472788,0.001173156,0.0035813623,0.002570983,0.010227902,0.0022768376,0.004119774,0.008479324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010478739,0.0005984934,0.0015785138,0.0025830495,0.03386197,0.012914174,0.005362304,0.0066738324,0.0009860444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045703514,0.0000042740185,0.00003247376,0.0000054403827,0.0000014883082,0.000009722126,0.00042030038,0.000065053675,0.000010886697,0.99861157,0.00017687891,0.0006571852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070909764,0.000008139138,0.000089908586,0.000017773375,0.0000020649777,0.000019652725,0.00023814215,0.0005356627,0.000034620887,0.9967039,0.002336977,0.0000060686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014246255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001234324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010227902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042460626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018857052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050390303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954017355","doi":"10.1017/s0953820818000316","title":"Sidgwick's Dualism of Practical Reason, Evolutionary Debunking, and Moral Psychology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Dualism; Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Intuitionism; Epistemology; Prudence; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.12371495770278428,"score_gpt":0.3470355135611986,"score_spread":0.22332055585841432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954017355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07043444,0.023635296,0.11142714,0.23984338,0.0021663199,0.000061012375,0.00009279308,0.000091592345,0.55224806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94899565,0.003219696,0.020137144,0.008254728,0.0007093776,0.000089228124,0.000023111006,0.00004669665,0.018524332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967439,0.0019162206,0.00010751735,0.00044869428,0.0006167867,0.00016675673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554574,0.002858759,0.00036236076,0.00047172382,0.0005023009,0.00025919496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049451035,0.00041293053,0.00048649,0.0016069264,0.0019929344,0.0052564275,0.0010541561,0.0029523799,0.0026477277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007386543,0.00022081491,0.0004504274,0.00072917563,0.038648102,0.00725141,0.0033607122,0.0048306384,0.00035570623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004801158,0.000003185312,0.000050436418,0.000013011146,0.0000018912672,0.0000164425,0.00051531417,0.000089903886,0.000049776794,0.9961976,0.0010906298,0.0019671686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026920043,0.0000022387546,0.00006025297,0.000020453444,9.453736e-7,0.000023876679,0.00010756681,0.00017258,0.000054509972,0.9921909,0.0073607946,0.0000031814386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013077765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011267719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052564275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050483043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020835001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036628187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966602879","doi":"10.1017/s0953820819000256","title":"On ‘Hybrid’ Theories of Personal Good","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Element (criminal law); State (computer science); Mathematical economics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.015121515441197544,"score_gpt":0.2353595637368893,"score_spread":0.22023804829569174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966602879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015957108,0.016691308,0.07232287,0.048717245,0.0006144914,0.000032966516,0.00009051284,0.00008871366,0.84548485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90356547,0.010087096,0.02025435,0.011228249,0.0013294488,0.00020742608,0.00014210536,0.000121101504,0.053064656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720615,0.0013775859,0.00006468035,0.0003987888,0.00070518843,0.00024764807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973616,0.001564599,0.00019270681,0.0003621698,0.0003559437,0.00016297953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038645808,0.0007740647,0.0005468779,0.0020982148,0.002212885,0.0069562485,0.0017243302,0.0028343918,0.0076148002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034778968,0.00027991302,0.0007491041,0.0018467606,0.028120669,0.011471041,0.004425234,0.0044476995,0.0015975495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023125638,0.000002055413,0.000025621672,0.0000072935454,0.0000019276495,0.000007109394,0.00037831077,0.00005069338,0.000011127514,0.99762446,0.0007488803,0.00114017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022786076,0.0000027465626,0.00008060523,0.000022112958,0.0000014436961,0.000022238324,0.00019252468,0.00013752573,0.00002004363,0.98770255,0.011812972,0.0000029400155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017791925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001731477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076148002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004413682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096641167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03202361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016237943","doi":"10.1017/s0953820820000060","title":"The Vegan's Dilemma","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); French horn; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Animal ethics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.007736165118407698,"score_gpt":0.18539852131224324,"score_spread":0.17766235619383555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016237943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03310211,0.0025103528,0.017788991,0.32469398,0.0024678288,0.00007003904,0.00006132601,0.0000848116,0.61922055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9058397,0.00090525625,0.0056172297,0.048528958,0.00072643434,0.00014882618,0.000027356084,0.00006999091,0.038136397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99294347,0.0041679735,0.0001656934,0.00069617067,0.0012741172,0.00075257954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99337995,0.0044242623,0.00034858522,0.0004649743,0.0007964473,0.00058565295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074895932,0.0005169708,0.00056153786,0.00093056605,0.0052606524,0.0056199348,0.001318867,0.008852513,0.007916791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017827475,0.00029321876,0.0004293128,0.00047819654,0.026072633,0.0061658937,0.0051644375,0.007718819,0.0010072072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013870893,0.000009886004,0.00011524433,0.000018008861,0.0000048077172,0.00013386348,0.0008825596,0.0001619705,0.000058301594,0.98292667,0.012469146,0.0032057639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014227154,0.000012548226,0.000060046917,0.00007161074,0.0000031454356,0.00026223515,0.00085037516,0.00041451445,0.000121593686,0.9181369,0.08004203,0.000010805935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013724694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011690708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008852513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00274518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002485618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039609194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036563981","doi":"10.1017/s0953820820000138","title":"Sidgwick's Distinction Passage","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Utilitarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.09239672567249559,"score_gpt":0.23545652548527007,"score_spread":0.1430597998127745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036563981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022588272,0.0048481063,0.01944504,0.1543745,0.0049807285,0.00008555469,0.00027658037,0.000055655048,0.7933455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.833541,0.0016619812,0.0077744545,0.055732697,0.0016421315,0.00030308665,0.00014830378,0.00011154541,0.099084854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477875,0.0017252526,0.00020257554,0.0014149499,0.0012919717,0.00058646756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740785,0.0015140042,0.000113377886,0.00029940656,0.00048126382,0.00018394362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048168562,0.0005438832,0.0005998108,0.0011963437,0.006341745,0.0067806677,0.0020067624,0.009172685,0.008053089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009448546,0.00039795082,0.000756124,0.0009810171,0.02456904,0.0077420888,0.004927902,0.014993986,0.0015714817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055873415,0.000002105087,0.00001766103,0.000004995271,9.762248e-7,0.00003850581,0.0008243338,0.000012901792,0.000041259245,0.99301696,0.0054149856,0.0006197873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001871535,0.000012493747,0.00016484316,0.00012882114,0.0000059501504,0.00014700797,0.0009124687,0.00015187208,0.000392022,0.7259838,0.27206182,0.000020123649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008925849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054575196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009849852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009849852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00324116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07146597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124021968","doi":"10.1017/s0953820811000252","title":"Bentham on Presumed Offences","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Value (mathematics); Law; Probabilistic logic; Jeremy bentham; Reasonable doubt; Proxy (statistics); Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.19807827353361548,"score_gpt":0.25762180641838406,"score_spread":0.059543532884768574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124021968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047121355,0.033266623,0.0043520946,0.06256233,0.0054527423,0.000042724903,0.0002101083,0.000057874087,0.8893434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3935249,0.034783468,0.0031268361,0.112461664,0.0078044683,0.0002061426,0.0001673547,0.00021424578,0.44771096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355847,0.0020094467,0.00041496725,0.001087727,0.0021960298,0.00073335227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653983,0.0019155379,0.000139301,0.0003146777,0.0009514314,0.00013919994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032583182,0.0005373993,0.0006103727,0.0016491298,0.005751149,0.0052063246,0.0013011154,0.009382631,0.013516984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012065016,0.00041982677,0.0005453923,0.00092141214,0.011499414,0.004333884,0.0040644994,0.009182307,0.0036782608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009175278,0.0000048235092,0.00010088934,0.000034109613,0.0000030175538,0.00012600276,0.00086671236,0.000076139004,0.000067029985,0.94427,0.04262768,0.011814421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009060864,0.00002121533,0.0006487973,0.0006600607,0.000009799804,0.00023116986,0.00049258984,0.00016147325,0.00021250859,0.24988,0.7476392,0.000034157376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0393844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042784356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0393844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004494813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042637764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07831031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156377128","doi":"10.1017/s095382082100011x","title":"What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Population; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.16720809244975068,"score_gpt":0.4030050556124028,"score_spread":0.2357969631626521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156377128","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012519725,0.0018786305,0.0053489446,0.9768341,0.006458723,0.000024535,0.00007245712,0.00005053703,0.00808007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062445585,0.002693133,0.012166931,0.9011138,0.014015041,0.00035208213,0.00015139578,0.00023684147,0.0068251668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9669794,0.014056295,0.002495471,0.005596908,0.007971529,0.0029004216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94411564,0.030864825,0.003523776,0.0036364337,0.013289369,0.0045700576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05650076,0.0012355014,0.0036937285,0.002976099,0.0121820085,0.016055228,0.014361355,0.036112245,0.013221665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12490542,0.0007106372,0.0027871842,0.0019903972,0.05223085,0.04224143,0.0120194275,0.060546882,0.007427898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110080386,0.000049177313,0.00061960897,0.0003179094,0.00012900608,0.0003343509,0.005210416,0.00027244174,0.00016541012,0.78777987,0.19176596,0.013245803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005976503,0.000041006588,0.0005297399,0.000681605,0.000051961862,0.00014885642,0.006393461,0.00045892698,0.00024038061,0.84061795,0.15067615,0.00010023546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058428766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047696983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05650076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005896919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069936584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29880816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215937039","doi":"10.1017/s095382082100039x","title":"Human Extinction and Moral Worthwhileness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond","keywords":"Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Existentialism; Philosophy; Sacrifice; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Theology; Physics","score_opus":0.054565776563617094,"score_gpt":0.24699603160291195,"score_spread":0.19243025503929484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215937039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09917858,0.014353113,0.029149398,0.105017245,0.0013782285,0.0000392968,0.000029118972,0.000072560004,0.75078243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990741,0.00089433487,0.0008264347,0.0016595552,0.0003166222,0.000014148321,0.0000048377606,0.00001363465,0.005529422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952154,0.0032097783,0.00008536346,0.00038185186,0.0007658484,0.00034169623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99148506,0.0054665906,0.00075203343,0.0009126964,0.0009454316,0.0004381847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005511994,0.0003278905,0.00041370123,0.0009873102,0.002716884,0.0049785906,0.0008715098,0.0031832673,0.004690151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010319232,0.00014120492,0.00029354938,0.00045659984,0.04190041,0.005445578,0.0053273416,0.00534277,0.00033134242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005885802,0.0000058124556,0.00006793826,0.00002679736,0.000002630449,0.000034401797,0.0016615265,0.00009768397,0.00006260216,0.9953733,0.00085981906,0.0018015519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005791551,0.000010655939,0.00021581305,0.00009322741,0.000004034172,0.00008332929,0.0015391409,0.00023619749,0.00015875223,0.96542627,0.032220602,0.000006189315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005619536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005752211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005511994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023527157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011545809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029150605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238668407","doi":"10.1017/s0953820817000085","title":"UTI volume 29 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Göteborgs Universitet; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; University of Missouri; University of East Anglia; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; University College London; London School of Economics and Political Science; Saint Louis University; York University; Tulane University; University of Otago; Queen Mary University of London; Florida State University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Environmental science; Geography; Meteorology; Physics; Engineering; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.026757242881305147,"score_gpt":0.3265337810120632,"score_spread":0.29977653813075805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238668407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017372598,0.0034146095,0.000349383,0.005077705,0.009596266,0.00007051497,0.0020521693,0.0012329601,0.9764692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049845544,0.0011880588,0.00028453267,0.00070485234,0.0014998151,0.00002310475,0.0010001811,0.00030219907,0.99001276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933785,0.000056888814,0.000024950963,0.00010544425,0.00036564155,0.000109270855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990392,0.00010708417,0.00004206149,0.00015771773,0.00031406357,0.00033990605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071930775,0.0007376668,0.00076644175,0.0020875968,0.0030431673,0.007438111,0.00078878546,0.002035094,0.7785909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015907941,0.00036192924,0.0005017749,0.0016642618,0.0009136003,0.0016032617,0.0028011547,0.0018325583,0.54698014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042002026,0.000059280777,0.00042000948,0.00018820574,0.0000059005956,0.00008554737,0.00010231915,0.00004663179,0.0007924173,0.0042755394,0.9286382,0.06534398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003404446,0.000011052086,0.0010656279,0.00011415403,0.0000020508924,0.000050190687,0.000068131856,0.000051343257,0.00025215195,0.00033078503,0.998047,0.0000040111004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004708399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010434608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22140908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027314266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027081408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31581318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243381491","doi":"10.1017/s0953820819000037","title":"UTI volume 31 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Göteborgs Universitet; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; University of Missouri; University of East Anglia; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; University College London; London School of Economics and Political Science; Saint Louis University; York University; Tulane University; University of Otago; Queen Mary University of London; Florida State University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Geography; Physics; Engineering; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.01958851249040404,"score_gpt":0.1927269284122684,"score_spread":0.17313841592186435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243381491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011573511,0.0037351947,0.00062495645,0.004217523,0.0108950855,0.00008755715,0.0028185265,0.0017661714,0.9746976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033968475,0.0012607906,0.000402242,0.00058462884,0.0018863468,0.000026114783,0.0015344865,0.00044908893,0.99045956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992237,0.00006208748,0.000034014767,0.00013634484,0.00043983324,0.00010403001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847585,0.00017671681,0.0000642181,0.00024414307,0.00054915954,0.0004898498],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078048423,0.00091465155,0.00087252137,0.002585022,0.0022885816,0.009111135,0.00094828557,0.0021972258,0.8194175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019944934,0.0003926677,0.0006380271,0.0021652859,0.0008376417,0.0019673542,0.002559685,0.002048779,0.6921534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046854544,0.00006417169,0.0003429418,0.00020946306,0.0000061144087,0.00007317916,0.000054196218,0.000049310558,0.00088647683,0.0030896603,0.9137284,0.08144916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039199535,0.000013116839,0.0007959473,0.00011168458,0.0000025899033,0.00006783625,0.000035885976,0.00006159373,0.00028093328,0.00042698657,0.9981951,0.0000043583354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023317812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005028588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18058252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021736429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002013103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25757897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243807325","doi":"10.1017/s095382081700019x","title":"UTI volume 29 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Göteborgs Universitet; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; University of Missouri; University of East Anglia; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; University College London; London School of Economics and Political Science; Saint Louis University; York University; Tulane University; University of Otago; Queen Mary University of London; Florida State University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Environmental science; Geography; Mathematics; Physics; Engineering; Meteorology; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.027333704281530893,"score_gpt":0.3267205375188658,"score_spread":0.29938683323733495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243807325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016064338,0.002870901,0.00033384902,0.004417535,0.008220518,0.00006681745,0.0020032031,0.0012707841,0.9792099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004745477,0.0010757023,0.0002711903,0.0006344838,0.0012826412,0.000021732136,0.000963659,0.0003030189,0.99070203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994005,0.000048982176,0.000022591348,0.00009670219,0.00033026747,0.000100873636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907863,0.00009936082,0.00003984579,0.00015397277,0.00030395278,0.00032416263],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006646978,0.0007197377,0.00075387134,0.0019676539,0.002994158,0.0071619167,0.00076651335,0.0019726257,0.7929624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014922845,0.00035128518,0.0005172939,0.0016295359,0.00088922976,0.0015349832,0.002673282,0.0018110874,0.5751796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040311654,0.000056502246,0.00040220396,0.0001770473,0.000005730919,0.00008100144,0.00009279079,0.000045064106,0.0007892134,0.0038897106,0.93095994,0.06346055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033993922,0.000011188384,0.0011013313,0.00011507517,0.0000021472601,0.000051196635,0.000067508445,0.000055642682,0.00027165926,0.00033717434,0.9979797,0.000004098178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049521383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010952081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20703763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002682368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025995048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.295314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253191964","doi":"10.1017/s095382081500045x","title":"UTI volume 27 issue 4 Cover and Front matter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Göteborgs Universitet; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; University of Missouri; University of East Anglia; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; University College London; London School of Economics and Political Science; Saint Louis University; York University; Tulane University; University of Otago; Queen Mary University of London; Florida State University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Physics; Engineering; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.0357382874893012,"score_gpt":0.317089383584607,"score_spread":0.2813510960953058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253191964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015643886,0.0027103547,0.00030356398,0.004135602,0.007833234,0.00006222562,0.0019478062,0.0012162783,0.9802265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004471609,0.0009622753,0.0002463085,0.0005636634,0.0011440709,0.000018726007,0.0009212593,0.00026189192,0.9914102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994118,0.000047462836,0.000022516964,0.0000957029,0.0003262233,0.0000963487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991381,0.00009105969,0.000038260074,0.00014328335,0.000286993,0.00030228953],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006425492,0.0007396991,0.00074183,0.002061114,0.0028986877,0.007041826,0.0007534196,0.0018668453,0.7955112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014193591,0.00035729117,0.00052233884,0.0016638903,0.0008640194,0.0014820696,0.0025509296,0.0017564228,0.57114106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004220157,0.00005471183,0.00040097395,0.00017211976,0.0000058101223,0.0000733821,0.000093785915,0.00004711024,0.0007914308,0.003927962,0.93194455,0.062446035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034328548,0.000011495296,0.0011149988,0.00010981254,0.0000021408384,0.000045434434,0.00006671147,0.00005363639,0.00027006425,0.00030784035,0.99801046,0.000004000562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005268594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011592154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7955112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027830654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026030703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29167843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256529887","doi":"10.1017/s095382080000409x","title":"Feeling Utilitarian","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Normative; Mill; Alienation; Philosophy; Feeling; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07949601172552787,"score_gpt":0.35299652292298844,"score_spread":0.27350051119746055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256529887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049975075,0.007178705,0.04716969,0.29764578,0.0028691345,0.000033997258,0.000065559936,0.00022886113,0.5948332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92101467,0.002121568,0.004540317,0.026523497,0.0011001934,0.00006136965,0.00003677474,0.00019387367,0.044407733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344033,0.003994293,0.000155611,0.0007556559,0.0011446859,0.00050945906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266136,0.0036656782,0.00072729576,0.00084595353,0.0013960897,0.0007036494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009957672,0.0004811601,0.0004002,0.00077461003,0.0028689506,0.008138188,0.00070389063,0.0041226074,0.009290519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015397551,0.0003128484,0.00033728642,0.000499686,0.02684078,0.011260279,0.0034440004,0.006438444,0.0024127674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011972959,0.000010024898,0.00018515978,0.000025778807,0.000006067143,0.000038483126,0.009804873,0.00006571615,0.00027869883,0.9712099,0.013810665,0.004552641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015124049,0.000027070282,0.00027433468,0.00009014715,0.000006454349,0.00012195594,0.005471327,0.00041380088,0.000270937,0.79988384,0.1933989,0.000026103819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082754786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095300085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009957672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022949413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001053187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052661836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282937470","doi":"10.1017/s0953820822000139","title":"Clifford's Consequentialism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Argument (complex analysis); Proposition; Counterexample; Consequentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08721855486844853,"score_gpt":0.2675061887832756,"score_spread":0.18028763391482705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282937470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029193051,0.0025360924,0.0876049,0.076949306,0.001125484,0.00014212201,0.00019918106,0.00015495808,0.8020949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456901,0.0007645022,0.013918737,0.009216703,0.0007509526,0.00016026701,0.00006493257,0.00009367193,0.029340217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99127275,0.0032613408,0.0005378301,0.0017269374,0.0025633639,0.0006378174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984969,0.008169803,0.0006134588,0.0026828428,0.0030006513,0.00056424807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012798632,0.000527998,0.00069703395,0.0025648861,0.0035945487,0.005248258,0.0023678578,0.0049431897,0.00735388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018745003,0.0005843215,0.0009363314,0.000908047,0.028431613,0.0059905653,0.00478092,0.006389398,0.0009899272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004991813,0.0000055630953,0.00005528546,0.000021124506,0.000003218681,0.00002929448,0.00032804025,0.00008490522,0.00003121559,0.9968245,0.0012325435,0.0013792654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009073084,0.0000031941809,0.00007247334,0.000045493707,0.000006158096,0.0000318152,0.00009567275,0.00040416297,0.0001472365,0.9865216,0.012657701,0.0000054510274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005116122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033810523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012798632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006329462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034957314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0676865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286492816","doi":"10.1017/s0953820822000152","title":"The Decline of Egoism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.039614504713568574,"score_gpt":0.24350493654294622,"score_spread":0.20389043182937766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286492816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04727261,0.0165381,0.0065171137,0.32161292,0.0010519987,0.000019632333,0.00008046324,0.0000712254,0.6068359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9459894,0.0038975773,0.0012497166,0.01581715,0.00069602655,0.00003205064,0.000026017631,0.00009649563,0.032195643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302614,0.004297757,0.00012713621,0.00072044064,0.0012686788,0.0005598563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98852926,0.006622243,0.00064788584,0.0013341644,0.00204899,0.00081739755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076535554,0.0002724246,0.0004573757,0.0012986091,0.003949689,0.008054094,0.00081087556,0.0034754302,0.00660394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01253267,0.00023717871,0.00029737243,0.00095385336,0.037162673,0.010526563,0.005055871,0.009656052,0.001044568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070841643,0.0000042645815,0.00010210117,0.000012638745,0.0000015227153,0.000011281222,0.0015981443,0.000036812056,0.000033966102,0.98764706,0.0057599265,0.004785114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009393021,0.000016473903,0.00055114925,0.00013953095,0.0000027654066,0.000068861365,0.0018107733,0.00030387464,0.00022431284,0.7718739,0.22498891,0.000010164135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005577375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034270738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01079768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01079768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004037065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078343034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323544903","doi":"10.1017/s0953820823000031","title":"Helen McCabe, <i>John Stuart Mill, Socialist</i> (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2021), pp. 368.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Mill; Economic history; Media studies; Art; Art history; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.01930532443906563,"score_gpt":0.27295858244113397,"score_spread":0.25365325800206834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323544903","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002878027,0.8594157,0.00073353155,0.10143738,0.005112017,0.000014063907,0.00042553814,0.000092046845,0.032481983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014622441,0.7727687,0.0016084589,0.025429169,0.0068188747,0.000075373144,0.0005564347,0.00034136654,0.17777923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989286,0.00035455098,0.00006493459,0.000120633355,0.00041682317,0.000114483584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974777,0.0013835159,0.00014456408,0.00008027785,0.00063765515,0.0002761722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001899446,0.0020221937,0.00095226936,0.0030018077,0.0035872771,0.004996561,0.001931599,0.0040644454,0.035305373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039403504,0.0011592099,0.00061752426,0.0050846157,0.0033861576,0.008846602,0.0016061906,0.004487609,0.018652985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014087266,0.000007691188,0.00015542698,0.00027044353,0.000008934885,0.000034095625,0.0008960464,0.00004215696,0.000045428653,0.008526597,0.9690514,0.020947628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008192617,0.0000040336035,0.0018524802,0.0006818645,0.000013115922,0.000085423766,0.0014984269,0.00006313355,0.00009475336,0.011632372,0.9840463,0.000019835526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18496113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43670538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18496113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008213639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060078283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36776912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403305789","doi":"10.1017/s0953820824000116","title":"Jeff Sebo, Saving Animals, Saving Ourselves: Why Animals Matter for Pandemics, Climate Change, and Other Catastrophes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. xvii + 255.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Pandemic; Economic history; Climate change; History; Political science; Philosophy; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Biology; Ecology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.05681980759642018,"score_gpt":0.2542892514322731,"score_spread":0.1974694438358529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403305789","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002083615,0.8147861,0.00042135606,0.1476698,0.015241649,0.000013442539,0.00025608428,0.000068222194,0.021335028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070562074,0.79396474,0.0010903575,0.0651596,0.012407427,0.00006287177,0.00049454224,0.00021694164,0.119547345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991303,0.00031650858,0.00008050915,0.00007030616,0.00032223325,0.000080225946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790454,0.0010955257,0.00015501723,0.00003875867,0.0004299506,0.00037626337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017018378,0.0012266097,0.00067343406,0.0018601888,0.0021766247,0.0035484317,0.0013155926,0.0050473604,0.03235752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039730924,0.0007264858,0.0004168935,0.0017891199,0.0024610853,0.008902594,0.0016097686,0.0051158983,0.018559953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013124046,0.000005789879,0.00008097277,0.00033036654,0.000005792862,0.000030002473,0.0005749912,0.000016810194,0.00003631546,0.003397846,0.97420746,0.0213005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074783,0.0000062046493,0.0010750764,0.0010675925,0.000008097299,0.00010501968,0.0013174268,0.000021898304,0.0000724968,0.0059328824,0.99037254,0.000013230868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030764172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086546555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03235752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023407524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032743488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108246684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403515261","doi":"10.1017/s0953820824000165","title":"Intuition and Kagan's Hierarchicalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04574917801499246,"score_gpt":0.3634780149275634,"score_spread":0.3177288369125709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403515261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11493171,0.0021293433,0.15447196,0.032943122,0.00044041788,0.00011391788,0.00034289053,0.00023607687,0.6943906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97754955,0.00026558386,0.012416968,0.0016401422,0.00012969186,0.00005521379,0.000044239285,0.000029261582,0.00786938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598855,0.0019700332,0.00012988935,0.00059510884,0.00092707726,0.00038934321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639493,0.001884872,0.00032281314,0.0004958274,0.00070675963,0.00019485498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004500407,0.00037441618,0.0005080657,0.0020919691,0.002349148,0.0028727262,0.0009625683,0.001665487,0.005068694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007157968,0.00035278217,0.0007340952,0.0011344673,0.021153778,0.004942807,0.003241711,0.0024422735,0.0005680164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004078062,0.0000038779435,0.00007329959,0.000008535208,0.0000023329067,0.0000111470945,0.00027029976,0.00014672878,0.000029573263,0.99799323,0.0005632002,0.0008935958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058770365,0.0000029504988,0.00013416559,0.000009882223,0.0000022688503,0.000020716623,0.00008137027,0.00047533045,0.000029189,0.99583876,0.0033957202,0.0000037813359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039793584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033890826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005068694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004562571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014552126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033103943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}