{"meta":{"query_hash":"c79d541ba869","filters":{"venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review"},"cohort_total":38,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"exported":38,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c79d541ba869","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Victoria+University+of+Wellington+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W141257998","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5516","title":"Democratising or Demonising the World Heritage Convention?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Treaty; Political science; Legitimacy; Democratic legitimacy; Democracy; Sovereignty; Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0668074836086298,"score_gpt":0.25057774953867323,"score_spread":0.18377026593004342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141257998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011002044,0.01973648,0.0019470406,0.004828757,0.0021178857,0.0014308039,0.000015900132,0.00021594108,0.9587051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7499659,0.01841968,0.0018101908,0.0027200356,0.0015312426,7.816368e-7,0.0000978409,0.000043197593,0.22541113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925894,0.00006325387,0.00021997142,0.00013207168,0.00017728895,0.00014847382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935603,0.00012575425,0.00018610334,0.00017725017,0.00012107763,0.00003377144],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063015585,0.00010354417,0.00019635339,0.00003284107,0.0006281098,0.0000615207,0.00023984193,0.000020219852,0.0042382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010083801,0.00007354599,0.00011826037,0.00012499614,0.00018580961,0.00033450872,0.000054613185,0.00009853224,0.000050165134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049729744,0.000027333423,0.00009103983,0.001073746,0.000057203222,0.000011746751,0.0025109034,0.0000017695503,0.000029910188,0.9829269,0.009318445,0.003901257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014729238,0.000022610788,0.000033647666,0.0011661077,0.000120958175,5.075884e-7,0.00096322974,0.000020802136,0.00003292642,0.00062359916,0.99676347,0.000104877836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066857005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026320577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002961426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008423171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99667203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585351093","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5048","title":"The Privy Council as the Final Court for the British Empire","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Empire; Section (typography); Work (physics); High Court; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.052886702333518804,"score_gpt":0.28416348668682817,"score_spread":0.23127678435330937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585351093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012882604,0.24514773,0.0017228979,0.065359876,0.0034562387,0.0022711933,0.00014037089,0.000078617355,0.6805348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4988917,0.45635524,0.00036199758,0.006568842,0.0025758871,0.000006250141,0.000011609758,0.000017441515,0.035211023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988527,0.00017327936,0.00012366456,0.00008822338,0.00048096044,0.00028112563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800664,0.0011674738,0.00015319083,0.00020021659,0.000388205,0.00008427935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00200097,0.00007076993,0.0001520161,0.0000022226923,0.0044403314,0.000063950996,0.0005764478,0.000042721233,0.00014919392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002506694,0.000046463352,0.00016322508,0.0001233599,0.0019118764,0.00011530689,0.000040782717,0.000108665015,0.000037972633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062590875,0.000013264293,0.00007301667,0.0000519998,0.00002846219,3.7595885e-7,0.00045410194,0.0000011985534,2.5210147e-7,0.9688868,0.029076459,0.0014078073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007643682,0.000013907459,0.000028665974,0.00021986499,0.00014368781,0.0000026528214,0.0006235705,0.0000024764938,7.9138005e-7,0.00050734513,0.998314,0.00006655424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02028752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008527442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96923757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015818539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012969915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99685574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201809459","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5396","title":"Book Review: Human Rights in the South Pacific – Challenges and Changes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022417580605305503,"score_gpt":0.2528157274758621,"score_spread":0.23039814687055662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201809459","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004565628,0.7627162,0.0000011590146,0.017932102,0.000077271005,0.00038697067,0.0000029053022,0.000015238229,0.2188225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031842053,0.9656836,0.0000124892995,0.0013043704,0.00010480189,3.7640518e-7,0.0000028069085,0.0000018627136,0.0010476339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893296,0.00031982744,0.0001310608,0.00018789734,0.00023919185,0.00018907145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995181,0.00006706713,0.00012957912,0.00018600748,0.000054645916,0.00004460575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001011597,0.00010682651,0.00037419415,0.000024106748,0.00063125324,0.0000075548905,0.00026245404,0.000056993715,0.0001541982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009769493,0.00007944924,0.00007590115,0.00014475109,0.00022416415,0.00007416831,0.000017852983,0.000108762135,0.000010222178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010107747,0.00008299866,0.000018896333,0.0033043232,0.000031519576,0.000022928214,0.063657686,7.464025e-8,0.0000013086923,0.81180537,0.1152316,0.0058332123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010352126,0.00006191422,0.000039539373,0.0037634764,0.000062437444,4.0499765e-7,0.00313737,1.2387088e-7,4.1254432e-7,0.00050997856,0.99222225,0.00009856621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056085497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041764714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021159653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011048783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48551533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210338013","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5228","title":"Why Legal History Matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Project commissioning; Publishing; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0128029408878248,"score_gpt":0.22982842293614558,"score_spread":0.21702548204832078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210338013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037038703,0.056579746,0.00017981969,0.07842842,0.010930933,0.0010332512,0.000024856849,0.0003768075,0.8487423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05513484,0.74108315,0.00959972,0.10693491,0.0038352788,0.000002223727,0.000072129646,0.00008471839,0.08325303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991309,0.00011169397,0.00011440337,0.0001712409,0.00029202868,0.00017974938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935925,0.00004410513,0.00013791314,0.00020585953,0.00013369325,0.00011919837],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048417525,0.000089519206,0.00023058496,0.0000038634694,0.00035131327,0.000009088129,0.00043962168,0.00014666804,0.0043383203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019734025,0.00009585079,0.00021138568,0.0001301438,0.0006655907,0.00024506432,0.000032368196,0.00026316484,0.00009647233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003231071,0.000027358416,0.000018363424,0.00029702383,0.00001753465,0.0000034780862,0.0025775917,2.2675664e-7,0.00025393514,0.549311,0.44732675,0.00016350619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009651593,0.00000819263,0.0000029283901,0.0002754874,0.00006865134,5.3385793e-7,0.00037061214,4.7485258e-7,0.00001808356,0.00021663627,0.9988273,0.0001146297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006809437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056133005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7654893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001213393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012040188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213989475","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5214","title":"Informal Land Titles: Snowden v Baker (1844)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Statutory law; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); High Court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014406159355908586,"score_gpt":0.26081987261241735,"score_spread":0.24641371325650877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213989475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020580685,0.0017715312,0.00026237988,0.003608467,0.00069738703,0.00054703164,0.00003191751,0.000101007456,0.9723996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9000327,0.07521946,0.0034032525,0.0010786806,0.0010674979,0.0000014579645,0.00004637154,0.00002200134,0.01912857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994429,0.00002969734,0.00010993843,0.00010282343,0.00018114751,0.00013354345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946606,0.000043271182,0.000099769095,0.0001884288,0.00010572728,0.0000967178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035880864,0.00005914694,0.00015078705,0.000015691265,0.0003218262,0.000015020252,0.00031222776,0.00007321983,0.0016832862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023650484,0.00006041367,0.00008274555,0.00016500044,0.00020961634,0.0001756007,0.000045993944,0.00014669793,0.00036316592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035127175,0.00003084518,0.0007547886,0.00023907975,0.000014130314,0.0000011596723,0.0011153511,0.0000013126239,0.00007747185,0.99198294,0.0042007803,0.0015786262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008646957,0.0000062305817,0.00011183129,0.00013542386,0.00003243621,2.3828585e-7,0.00007514741,0.000005150633,0.00001826979,0.00018341905,0.99927175,0.000073638694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006607559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011501637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014881821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090902366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218652726","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i2.5264","title":"Immigration Bill 2007: Special Advocates and the Right to be Heard","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mirroring; Immigration; Appeal; Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Human rights; Subject (documents); Immigration law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01922557278183171,"score_gpt":0.2581632762789021,"score_spread":0.23893770349707041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218652726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01706781,0.049301732,0.00669794,0.35477546,0.00442927,0.0059744664,0.00008505095,0.00031697957,0.5613513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1769062,0.7935197,0.0028761656,0.014572647,0.0073250537,0.0000011559097,0.00005717832,0.000023289287,0.004718611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991386,0.0002698312,0.00012249686,0.00015218479,0.00019985666,0.000117035845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995017,0.00008665893,0.00009440575,0.00013840948,0.00010262113,0.00007621268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009070108,0.00006964348,0.00018628156,0.000025082414,0.00047646696,0.000023912837,0.00019107759,0.000035535406,0.00030352428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007831159,0.00004974751,0.00006235406,0.00019773262,0.00021222563,0.00018834772,0.00002508356,0.000079897545,0.00006732937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004885032,0.00008106051,0.0000108552695,0.00049993163,0.000030256579,0.000011552674,0.015147038,0.0000060382436,0.0000914281,0.8863317,0.065896414,0.031405218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000186189,0.00006681194,0.000016908947,0.00031288093,0.00012535235,5.220917e-7,0.000844311,0.0000032209007,0.000038298476,0.00056068605,0.9977745,0.0000703326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003655875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018035502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9318781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031812036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032440472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5526614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219607269","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v39i2.5464","title":"Freedom of Expression, Commercial Expression and Tobacco in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Supreme court; Freedom of expression; Law; Flexibility (engineering); Value (mathematics); Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Economics; Computer science; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.011249540627606525,"score_gpt":0.18831942828267745,"score_spread":0.17706988765507092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219607269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94810045,0.0237473,0.020085013,0.0007218234,0.0014994929,0.00078084413,0.000018583301,0.00008020262,0.004966322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637925,0.028412744,0.0076280083,0.00008855531,0.0000308624,2.268419e-7,0.0000025299933,0.000004753498,0.000039812294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991664,0.00009169178,0.00019937057,0.00019655036,0.00022161951,0.0001243184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934375,0.000053992502,0.00016801867,0.00028252817,0.00007744753,0.00007426034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014889591,0.000089851885,0.00030126478,0.00004011087,0.00010299231,0.00000305171,0.00037875323,0.00004259543,0.000028654107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012802197,0.00009208778,0.000042359177,0.00023807389,0.000064385626,0.000199703,0.00012954442,0.00009896729,0.000001824002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010184635,0.0021263468,0.22239117,0.024246378,0.0003192088,0.0019797278,0.017435174,0.0021868313,0.2122454,0.19143483,0.12622117,0.1983953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021481304,0.0002183175,0.007906682,0.011767587,0.00004726707,0.00004400178,0.00015113213,0.00068781874,0.06603742,0.00025380068,0.91001827,0.00071959995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43842056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21087442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7837971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000693572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022004194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8035251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231547810","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5412","title":"The State of Judicial Scrutiny of Public Contracting in New Zealand and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Procurement; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Public administration; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Public law; Government procurement; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.023303310904248944,"score_gpt":0.2576232751249873,"score_spread":0.23431996422073834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231547810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86097544,0.06090115,0.0001515595,0.024400579,0.00076817034,0.0015113531,0.000075365344,0.00002374621,0.051192615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640924,0.03540939,0.000063000734,0.000035875168,0.00005152762,6.892052e-8,0.0000010368692,0.000001930761,0.00034481712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993688,0.00010276324,0.00016326769,0.000057124962,0.0001626376,0.00014542836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992845,0.00022084096,0.0002428793,0.000084787935,0.000078403966,0.0000885956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085373275,0.000039007027,0.00017322451,0.000010592854,0.0001682822,0.0000049294545,0.00015790729,0.000019480403,0.0000198443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074695694,0.000034654677,0.00002737322,0.00014983166,0.00016442231,0.00011192891,0.000029933415,0.000061987455,4.1674744e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019103949,0.00007506872,0.038600355,0.00046346858,0.000050874885,6.8159227e-7,0.0054226993,0.0000050010367,0.00011964989,0.9303828,0.0032467165,0.021613607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010629486,0.0000047141057,0.0013473144,0.00020048303,0.00001939565,6.9068825e-8,0.00032308817,0.0000020174448,0.00003235745,0.00023531474,0.9976939,0.000035063913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9240559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92244536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046675174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004662203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14131767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308837678","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5386","title":"A Pacific Human Rights Mechanism: Specific Challenges and Requirements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Human rights; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Project commissioning; Key (lock); Political science; Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Business; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Social science; Computer security; Finance; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03629845025561608,"score_gpt":0.2645375673411293,"score_spread":0.22823911708551325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2308837678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018508929,0.09793541,0.00008295769,0.0032206485,0.00048467383,0.00054747734,0.0000075294074,0.00008181758,0.8957886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5626196,0.43603277,0.00019537246,0.000028653089,0.00013451699,1.1986087e-7,0.000003518357,0.0000033534952,0.0009820986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998936,0.00015057731,0.0001592415,0.00024871418,0.00028245169,0.00022302319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945855,0.000033448185,0.00013909994,0.00018056807,0.000091099966,0.00009723903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740531,0.00012100998,0.0003588218,0.00003108997,0.001023171,0.000011558364,0.00020098884,0.00007780454,0.0001618768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003667855,0.00011856133,0.00009481087,0.0001148683,0.00021027542,0.00012644878,0.000025956313,0.00008005968,0.000019379622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065133004,0.000035167646,0.0000034423133,0.00015157474,0.000018975199,0.0000071130075,0.0055658957,2.7033288e-8,0.000017358896,0.9905106,0.0012543718,0.0024289666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019297254,0.000097285134,0.000020917656,0.00074201426,0.00004753353,4.089569e-7,0.0026015188,3.4217874e-7,0.000010143734,0.02127931,0.97487074,0.00013681085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050202134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011709853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97361636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043292173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012128676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78695077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338978280","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i2.4918","title":"The Implications of a Supreme Law Bill Of Rights for New Zealand Judicial Appointments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","score_opus":0.03882758577520705,"score_gpt":0.2898765720509398,"score_spread":0.25104898627573274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338978280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02115082,0.15429866,0.0051472937,0.056147538,0.0068159965,0.015012682,0.00067369745,0.00029845958,0.74045485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832053,0.014232435,0.0004853453,0.00010489294,0.0004939304,0.0000016825854,0.0000132292125,0.0000100641755,0.001453094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907136,0.00010459174,0.00028112755,0.00012839853,0.000265517,0.00014900145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985893,0.00017260089,0.0004184895,0.00018140182,0.0005138885,0.00012432542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007832111,0.00007384445,0.00034567728,0.000017121532,0.00037230257,0.000008769548,0.0003880799,0.000064087704,0.00002010392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006869982,0.00005300151,0.00013337955,0.00025067764,0.00037035625,0.00013301703,0.00003192091,0.00004203282,0.0000048476145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037811762,0.000046903977,0.00012570921,0.00027125297,0.000048805603,1.1916871e-7,0.002015935,0.0000015187087,0.000034532088,0.98142654,0.015650587,0.00034028638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030589956,0.00007800876,0.000009584461,0.0005368808,0.00010513114,9.874404e-8,0.0001483027,7.105051e-7,0.00013347455,0.05427964,0.94434327,0.000058978738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22582304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04116832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049328748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030012528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97632784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347051369","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5519","title":"Hegemonic Federalism: The Democratic Implications of the UN Security Council's \"Legislative\" Phase","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Federalism; Public administration; Democracy; Legislation; Hegemony; Government (linguistics); Security council; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.031430712782297955,"score_gpt":0.289482856809323,"score_spread":0.25805214402702503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347051369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16462475,0.010010231,0.0021525268,0.021737438,0.0015251478,0.0024217304,0.000114488816,0.00008645901,0.7973272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940916,0.003281533,0.00008176786,0.00038626348,0.00012288612,3.0002118e-7,0.0000037777247,0.0000043725327,0.0020275211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987269,0.00021507627,0.0002311637,0.00013525618,0.0005316462,0.00015993924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844885,0.00026181684,0.00033314642,0.00027431114,0.000629488,0.000052379743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015711009,0.00008476843,0.00020440188,0.000013231398,0.0011818669,0.000013800274,0.0006831869,0.00005474089,0.00040442942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052033723,0.00005763811,0.00019133138,0.00017951973,0.0006710847,0.00013624011,0.000047523456,0.00013179841,0.000012079012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008031555,0.000066290086,0.000036536076,0.000081750826,0.000032096963,5.309029e-7,0.0027446458,9.003626e-7,0.00002166105,0.9960386,0.00087535224,0.00009358719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023505164,0.000019394285,0.00013541512,0.0003534029,0.00010855319,5.890682e-7,0.000086450316,0.0000047381045,0.00012176483,0.09113039,0.9077313,0.00007297007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004593952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015858697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90685594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020624597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030087927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9090083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414343126","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i2.5845","title":"The Patentability of Human Beings: The Effect of a Proposed Exclusion in the Patents Act 1953","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Project commissioning; Patent law; Publishing; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Economics; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.051507120759562625,"score_gpt":0.2169979599029825,"score_spread":0.1654908391434199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414343126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96827626,0.0071849157,0.00001528648,0.0012175771,0.00040028585,0.0023517562,0.0000044635503,0.00002579179,0.020523665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99410474,0.0055788043,0.0000030855488,0.00016130877,0.00006519292,8.0961263e-7,0.000006656708,0.000007630669,0.00007178772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986379,0.0002711105,0.0003672216,0.00017598977,0.0003700974,0.00017765518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866515,0.00028682785,0.0004663153,0.00041966245,0.00015482391,0.0000071878358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019410752,0.00015352028,0.00037740974,0.00004009415,0.00045096356,0.000022486198,0.00084120064,0.000056827404,0.00029035663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001155268,0.00007324306,0.0002214706,0.0004667749,0.00028837932,0.00021759857,0.00017799294,0.0001917954,0.000038941515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006360318,0.0068572043,0.304311,0.20258398,0.002265814,0.0001342181,0.034031708,0.00036290128,0.0249704,0.17675161,0.039529376,0.20184146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031807576,0.0008459128,0.0038344737,0.011181891,0.001189852,0.000002522761,0.0008650718,0.002239106,0.0036293312,0.0012764988,0.97113967,0.00061490614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034519737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032922678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002252758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005029204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5218375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550297742","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5383","title":"Legal Pluralism, Customary Law and Human Rights in Francophone African Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"French; Human rights; Charter; Political science; Legal pluralism; Colonialism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Comparative law; Geography; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00787781370084571,"score_gpt":0.23692712362302998,"score_spread":0.22904930992218428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550297742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14791948,0.014683648,0.000016274606,0.0037116015,0.00074265304,0.0011652734,0.00003686676,0.00014882021,0.8315754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872627,0.010912516,0.0001095612,0.00063155405,0.00018351103,1.7610382e-7,0.000009560826,0.000004957267,0.00088543934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987011,0.00018434576,0.00022887801,0.00024675558,0.00032330412,0.0003155958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993556,0.000059326634,0.00016334736,0.00018815722,0.00010940702,0.00012416365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054904463,0.00014563891,0.00046589115,0.000052812185,0.0013810368,0.000033916756,0.00030631965,0.000120979326,0.0003950995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000030053077,0.00013676712,0.000091307185,0.00033151268,0.0006574917,0.00034360818,0.000022670982,0.0001530995,0.000022486884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000137839415,0.000052183314,0.000040487772,0.00014865323,0.000009512301,0.000031071908,0.006314136,6.397544e-7,0.000010481219,0.992807,0.0005100155,0.00006203532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002857334,0.000071914445,0.000113637216,0.00070337707,0.000035808982,9.96346e-7,0.000266802,4.7480646e-7,0.000029171148,0.0025815342,0.9957284,0.00018217627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24370213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32843232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99521834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011777562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009244929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604885731","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i2.4743","title":"Law School as Social Innovation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; New Zealand Law Foundation","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Mandate; Project commissioning; Legal education; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Publishing; Public relations; Resilience (materials science); Sociology; Law; Social science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05594210053858727,"score_gpt":0.2648109310513972,"score_spread":0.2088688305128099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604885731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060013685,0.005530092,0.00026450257,0.004595302,0.0008747301,0.00040047924,0.000055627646,0.00005692386,0.92820865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807959,0.016065296,0.00030381026,0.00071756437,0.00015253655,2.55151e-7,0.000031957657,0.000011892232,0.0019207681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934185,0.000022982904,0.0002988663,0.0001480144,0.000047650195,0.0001406386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987918,0.00002025041,0.0006773532,0.00035720534,0.00010662899,0.00004673912],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005883279,0.00009905697,0.0004176955,0.000058290163,0.0010821996,0.00006125474,0.0005605308,0.00009214943,0.0011770598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105711355,0.00013646216,0.00012206223,0.00015470955,0.00017076728,0.00043077112,0.00012540432,0.00015880365,0.00068589987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006482538,0.000027472257,0.0012435254,0.00021387498,0.000038469167,0.0000012131313,0.00026223503,1.04144284e-7,0.000005328079,0.99604607,0.0016507426,0.0005044631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029815568,0.000019182824,0.002152541,0.00026360992,0.00001652276,2.813483e-7,0.00003219681,0.0000029317687,0.000017337574,0.028416406,0.96862125,0.0001595639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005938081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038205402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009798658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003719568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624364408","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5945","title":"Search for Principle - The Government's Liability in Negligence for the Careless Exercise of its Statutory Powers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Project commissioning; Liability; Government (linguistics); Law; Publishing; Business; Strict liability; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02710318604166993,"score_gpt":0.3033416156082833,"score_spread":0.2762384295666134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624364408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5700012,0.19232151,0.0096119,0.040872067,0.0019265616,0.05562119,0.0034106364,0.00021866258,0.12601632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8143145,0.18301092,0.00037248735,0.00011339665,0.000075874756,0.00001968796,0.0000064156457,0.000009639677,0.0020771197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902666,0.00010188648,0.0001928802,0.00017244168,0.00031757908,0.00018858117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885,0.0005365606,0.00011419473,0.00029547198,0.00015570855,0.000048055645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013416798,0.00007037699,0.00021219315,0.000006352286,0.0004661517,0.000010158124,0.00063357846,0.000046905574,0.00017704593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039636347,0.00005293249,0.00014893789,0.00026159314,0.00032678363,0.00009896423,0.00004006405,0.00008560099,0.0000042029774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015576938,0.00019254426,0.00055029086,0.002546964,0.000036730362,2.7000627e-7,0.009663614,0.0006208453,0.000082686674,0.9622434,0.00053955906,0.023367334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001511288,0.000021291551,0.0001375005,0.0004124149,0.00005737793,1.8013115e-8,0.0011444878,0.00012417234,0.00021076728,0.00012460459,0.9975553,0.000060912418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037431975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020639799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001393886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001683847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.565862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910877383","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i3.5327","title":"Litigating Climate Change – Of Politics and Political Questions: A Comparative Analysis of Justiciability of Climate Change in the United States and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Political question; Political science; Politics; Law; Context (archaeology); Climate change; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03288232814075758,"score_gpt":0.270340585075876,"score_spread":0.2374582569351184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910877383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976104,0.0010652645,0.000009655572,0.00025499848,0.0000242024,0.0002611709,0.00031832236,0.00000340507,0.00045256555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97561234,0.024074888,0.00015244345,0.000112743975,0.000013038514,7.3445597e-7,0.000031091076,0.0000023553966,3.5677036e-7],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909985,0.00011722251,0.00026993456,0.00014045597,0.00016599921,0.00020656013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992701,0.0002529432,0.00019664573,0.00015870942,0.00006042793,0.00006121215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042777148,0.00009355006,0.0004506612,0.000065422035,0.00006124548,0.0000022383097,0.000117694544,0.00003122196,0.00006113235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002748922,0.00008325453,0.000042918487,0.00058668206,0.0004915347,0.00007738555,0.00011347406,0.000057861744,2.7936088e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007574448,0.00039238948,0.6733108,0.018269232,0.00034649778,0.000011030471,0.042108387,0.00025458337,0.0003498609,0.26401946,0.000032177766,0.0008298565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001788064,0.0012642865,0.83328253,0.01917892,0.008235935,0.000007492096,0.031010117,0.069464505,0.0016295166,0.0013123838,0.03156607,0.0012601818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63841695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41385368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26270705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006093978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007669542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.596842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949360093","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i3.4898","title":"The Crown's Relationship with Tribal Peoples and the Legal Dynamics for the Resolution of Historical and Contemporary Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Legalism (Western philosophy); Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Ceremony; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.01895321507556511,"score_gpt":0.2148043660116618,"score_spread":0.1958511509360967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949360093","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22896603,0.3819724,0.05003275,0.18183778,0.002652768,0.012698476,0.00026212574,0.00017363609,0.14140405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922334,0.005925512,0.0005108681,0.0000561896,0.00002838556,0.0000013838605,0.00000615669,0.000004835244,0.0012332859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993514,0.00012319401,0.0001373207,0.00010929693,0.00021145178,0.00006735822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858826,0.0010109865,0.00017206225,0.0001441276,0.00005222099,0.00003235685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084710214,0.0000652698,0.00015555751,0.0000053930657,0.00029128118,0.000011741416,0.00020352844,0.00003147851,0.000008250189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009954083,0.000034770812,0.00004292897,0.00007666158,0.00074363983,0.00012700772,0.00007727909,0.000076942575,0.0000015133785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006789478,0.000021017504,0.005500754,0.00014971293,0.000035352958,7.902325e-7,0.00041912316,0.00007844345,0.000002295675,0.98905265,0.0037160588,0.00034484742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010283352,0.00011679129,0.001995931,0.00024507687,0.00013072888,0.000005880418,0.00023067802,0.0027312916,0.0000046968694,0.0028872448,0.9905474,0.00007595504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004451773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030568151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016944914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026279879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6729779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949536135","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i4.5333","title":"Foreword: The Dynamic Evolution of International Law – Rise or Decline?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo; Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; New Zealand Law Foundation; National University of Singapore; York University","keywords":"Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Field (mathematics); International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014964126067174906,"score_gpt":0.2810331926632186,"score_spread":0.2660690665960437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949536135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06606901,0.008498886,0.008415521,0.012642382,0.007968183,0.0018012776,0.0002633545,0.00016270136,0.8941787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98609895,0.004356181,0.0004468109,0.00018869711,0.00036103724,2.620888e-7,0.000008881156,0.0000051704064,0.00853401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990275,0.0001237873,0.00019303284,0.00013210822,0.0004095721,0.000114019895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989045,0.000111808535,0.00025091338,0.0001569116,0.0005352987,0.000040517647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005907104,0.000071440656,0.00017420684,0.000028603907,0.00045729414,0.000008959469,0.00065506896,0.000057603072,0.0017516185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032541684,0.000053129468,0.00012729522,0.0000991749,0.0009372722,0.00017866628,0.00006759013,0.00007228278,0.00007149256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003419863,0.000030720577,0.000028373224,0.00007092542,0.00003440853,9.251186e-7,0.0004965406,0.0000010286706,0.000007664716,0.9987404,0.0004472432,0.000107587744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015139583,0.000044736018,0.000048954134,0.00057300006,0.000060837694,4.7385842e-7,0.000058517773,0.00009573521,0.000023376046,0.03182442,0.96705335,0.00006519817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009012129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050250385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96691597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015403602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114252725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950114440","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i3.4735","title":"Fiducia in Public Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Private law; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Public law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0487478028784544,"score_gpt":0.30280212028204084,"score_spread":0.2540543174035864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950114440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040421886,0.0034699484,0.00008300509,0.018498424,0.0002979416,0.00046319707,0.000013726659,0.00004244907,0.9730891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619954,0.036193468,0.000288196,0.00025393532,0.000112218695,4.278876e-7,0.0000037601549,0.0000043361983,0.001148233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999296,0.00008028414,0.00012133728,0.00015789468,0.00017724468,0.00016721351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991698,0.00003958179,0.00019617968,0.0004114857,0.00009387606,0.00008902655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061717536,0.000059799033,0.00019962547,0.000016147142,0.001040768,0.000051120503,0.0007543725,0.000060016035,0.000347038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052502186,0.00006767336,0.00008523308,0.00010150529,0.00043504866,0.00035111487,0.00009073224,0.00009774966,0.00009459099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010839132,0.000027784788,0.00031330567,0.00010764632,0.0000044063813,0.0000014698209,0.00033990943,3.2178846e-7,0.0000067223814,0.9981473,0.00040725493,0.0006427661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010885371,0.000005143959,0.00017338182,0.00036784777,0.000016120415,6.907898e-8,0.00008286541,0.0000027336084,0.000009498797,0.0022317271,0.99692786,0.00007389948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039851278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04883491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006640975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009003788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96852136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952609420","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i4.5023","title":"The Shafts of Strife and War: A Critical Analysis of the Immigration (Mass Arrivals) Amendment Bill","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Immigration; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Immigration law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.016215360915711394,"score_gpt":0.28257503428005754,"score_spread":0.26635967336434613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952609420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76354843,0.17777696,0.011466869,0.021603968,0.0029003925,0.0033414853,0.00024683803,0.00008529549,0.019029746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9199535,0.07965437,0.0001372693,0.000050391547,0.00005493308,3.6065416e-7,0.0000061110863,0.0000022734519,0.00014073227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.00037702746,0.0002598823,0.00009960034,0.00035913484,0.00012712111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988645,0.00025712376,0.0002814686,0.00019835147,0.0003377328,0.000060838764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011638302,0.00007038455,0.00027598903,0.000040875057,0.00037378632,0.000007664009,0.00021305848,0.000058432306,0.00010587353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020712816,0.000042081432,0.0001979334,0.00055629446,0.00043728063,0.00020220083,0.000021227856,0.00006157143,0.0000013054066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025980942,0.00011931167,0.006819903,0.0004434491,0.00035075875,8.30873e-8,0.016091926,0.00001422115,0.0015329269,0.9717275,0.0013095922,0.0015643766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013756646,0.00005890367,0.0018360291,0.00064087653,0.0020883342,1.0421805e-7,0.004148596,0.00023093131,0.0016384324,0.00092402863,0.9881649,0.000131293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004556819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076289987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048725356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056674056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68885773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975264628","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i3.5612","title":"Book Review: The Constitution of Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Commonwealth; Independence (probability theory); Constitutional theory; Nothing; Constitutional law; Law; Historiography; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013585651942245428,"score_gpt":0.2650917697447398,"score_spread":0.2515061178024944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975264628","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001368124,0.6758803,0.00043761334,0.012815241,0.000179618,0.00037429298,0.000020666972,0.000019407851,0.3102592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027977144,0.9573338,0.00023018967,0.011991793,0.00014611123,2.6540522e-7,0.0000055408823,0.0000019795784,0.002313178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895114,0.00021400685,0.00020763851,0.00011186101,0.00037740773,0.00013792029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904186,0.00015397585,0.0002713851,0.00019247153,0.0002714949,0.000068835376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007240244,0.00007210906,0.00027412962,0.000013488239,0.00034814424,0.0000031653174,0.0003661969,0.0000501929,0.0014784095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008865891,0.00006258486,0.00013236114,0.00020107975,0.0020270126,0.00018020948,0.00003264738,0.000112210044,0.00005434776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002296692,0.000016217202,0.000012921191,0.0006307799,0.000012280529,6.84415e-7,0.0000953314,0.000004471875,0.0000032826224,0.92517084,0.07362184,0.0004290541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055983026,0.000011013969,0.0000020192256,0.0035901107,0.0001222699,0.0000011322854,0.00004364145,0.0000010625556,0.000020744255,0.000049559414,0.9960357,0.00006677628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034005179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042609722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007115443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067314616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975404603","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v35i1.5632","title":"\"Vexatious and an Abuse of the Process of the Court\": The Assets Company v Mere Roihi Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Certainty; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020904804518232796,"score_gpt":0.2892961959220668,"score_spread":0.268391391403834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975404603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649066,0.0065840026,0.00006329735,0.006216452,0.0002002483,0.0014199094,0.00007151642,0.000024177436,0.020513808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868532,0.012902512,0.000055519966,0.000080645754,0.000029764205,4.2833904e-7,9.923664e-7,0.0000030883416,0.0000738763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999264,0.00013711298,0.00014388813,0.00010736814,0.00026011607,0.00008753063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991014,0.00008324447,0.00030951467,0.00030060022,0.00016718233,0.000038068534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035112927,0.000062879364,0.00017822042,0.0000066363627,0.0005585724,0.000008510907,0.00061559456,0.000037313424,0.000016128863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020517538,0.000036451245,0.00008562495,0.00029867544,0.0006686567,0.000096899494,0.00004706953,0.00008537314,0.0000011046179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064679157,0.00014297431,0.0012810951,0.0007489901,0.000037128084,4.7408906e-7,0.00971667,0.00014155866,0.000080531565,0.9874475,0.00015084416,0.00024577737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033672614,0.000030074529,0.0032252143,0.0017570175,0.0003265095,0.0000023132784,0.002793982,0.000010827778,0.00050182175,0.0032497062,0.9876395,0.00012631963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005800572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006426693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002520575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001132286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8768769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976173574","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v37i4.5583","title":"Recognising Multi-textualism: Rethinking New Zealand's Legal History","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty of Waitangi; Treaty; Project commissioning; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Publishing; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043234437444675825,"score_gpt":0.27235618299210623,"score_spread":0.22912174554743042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976173574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11047249,0.3879141,0.0007991771,0.037189495,0.021421023,0.007620979,0.000047876147,0.0015728702,0.432962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24062495,0.4444729,0.022839723,0.0034496218,0.0020897281,0.0000014113036,0.00006460947,0.00009901845,0.28635803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820447,0.0003347912,0.00026995188,0.00035042528,0.0005001141,0.0003402261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988058,0.00018133456,0.000356813,0.00022912519,0.0002413464,0.00018555053],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085636956,0.00018424721,0.000570121,0.00003150698,0.0004646937,0.000021599672,0.000478672,0.00016420185,0.0019604743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001247007,0.00018830108,0.0002641448,0.00020447382,0.00032538982,0.0004610225,0.000101786536,0.00027216715,0.00034084715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017701305,0.0003882328,0.006009545,0.0049132775,0.00076024723,0.00007325755,0.26635322,0.000038386508,0.0014075994,0.4394139,0.26026922,0.020196073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041218262,0.000026227106,0.000067893685,0.0018466852,0.00012053453,5.1189187e-7,0.00096792367,0.000006386892,0.000016329685,0.000097657874,0.99619937,0.0002382974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090911016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008765435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73593014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077723217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022792771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976279444","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5529","title":"Using Human Rights Treaties to Resolve Ambiguity: the Advent of A Rights-Conscious Charming Betsy Canon","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Dualism; International human rights law; Political science; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Immigration; Common law; Fundamental rights; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03278274552012431,"score_gpt":0.3137602957655722,"score_spread":0.2809775502454479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976279444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6617162,0.008358203,0.0058761253,0.0031802135,0.0021334556,0.0026886421,0.000083609084,0.0001294206,0.3158341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996837,0.0008118024,0.0009606375,0.000119108234,0.00027309914,2.3225745e-7,0.000008852963,0.0000056354884,0.0009836103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883026,0.00013522849,0.0002567263,0.00015474751,0.00044258352,0.0001804608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990566,0.00010891557,0.00029628718,0.00015608458,0.00030915136,0.00007297217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011044771,0.00009336148,0.00025681447,0.000059760467,0.0009993368,0.000010888909,0.0003341557,0.000058665915,0.00013903463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016660204,0.00007857388,0.00014016534,0.00024458257,0.00023872234,0.00012534112,0.00003882489,0.00007683714,0.000008861957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017104312,0.000041961914,0.00012107928,0.00012555161,0.000036820693,0.000004660003,0.0034253912,0.000008840631,0.00038291895,0.99540204,0.00018436532,0.00024924468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014550747,0.000045129906,0.000092742535,0.0014666537,0.00012957318,4.966611e-7,0.00017834667,0.0000053777712,0.0015400735,0.005961481,0.9903206,0.00011400158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15142882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12771948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99013627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021308263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059101614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88819736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976893161","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5518","title":"Deliberation and Legitimacy in Transnational Governance: The Case of Environmental Impact Assessments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Legitimacy; Environmental governance; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Transnational governance; Criticism; Corporate governance; Harm; Democratic legitimacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Economics; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.009568564324980777,"score_gpt":0.2713858767380855,"score_spread":0.26181731241310474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976893161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946091,0.00093328254,0.00035088928,0.0001850807,0.000051927727,0.00034412136,0.00005220299,0.000003888818,0.0034694923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938922,0.0055663073,0.00039086668,0.000072814684,0.000009766679,2.2014572e-7,0.0000112034795,0.000005146956,0.000051487586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920094,0.00006658791,0.00021538857,0.00015047926,0.00022868466,0.00013791946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999577,0.00006948392,0.00017715702,0.00011260865,0.0000028457316,0.000060930717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048453838,0.00010395955,0.00019169334,0.000010971209,0.00010756197,0.000004563345,0.00012577251,0.000044940913,0.0011456336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000026434616,0.00008900061,0.000078419536,0.000114460236,0.0003002093,0.00029511892,0.000060617807,0.00009701075,0.000005772496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063204014,0.003798267,0.6258272,0.0018487526,0.0004902421,0.0011856827,0.007658714,0.0017044342,0.049895886,0.1314431,0.0010568822,0.17445882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025268008,0.0004501487,0.9413149,0.0005721413,0.00027669835,0.00016100187,0.0007987317,0.00053314125,0.0013712735,0.0011851322,0.05023113,0.0005789199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014687662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009812219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31548768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026443586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008236521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977226620","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i4.5628","title":"The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: The Canadian Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Convention; Project commissioning; Law; Preference; Publishing; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03721263206562045,"score_gpt":0.2965334689502709,"score_spread":0.25932083688465046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977226620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006679699,0.009566656,0.0006320281,0.16003443,0.0031237956,0.0024827,0.00014735264,0.00004641448,0.8172869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93967456,0.05365951,0.00005989742,0.0016405586,0.0002755889,0.000002005307,0.000017494023,0.0000054503757,0.004664964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922276,0.00012939493,0.00015647555,0.00008308466,0.00029831735,0.00010998488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982786,0.00092883967,0.00020674536,0.00014019376,0.0003967593,0.0000488708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009335645,0.000052182,0.00008362716,0.00005942575,0.0012219425,0.000035495068,0.00070841215,0.000027421705,0.00015983461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032076752,0.000033242566,0.00010624502,0.00028622025,0.0004085577,0.00011956235,0.000015515581,0.00008246338,0.000016127664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011611138,0.0000145653985,0.00001121311,0.000009443284,0.000028939708,1.4670081e-7,0.00077958184,0.000036783844,0.000010071788,0.99685824,0.0016093607,0.00063002994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013500868,0.000014377981,0.000059109414,0.00021824933,0.000030420628,1.1612526e-7,0.00038604933,0.0002297366,0.00005211344,0.00013357229,0.9987036,0.000037633385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06524801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44153547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012102139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014042413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94097656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004382415","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i1.5968","title":"Access to Legal Education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033139406781002884,"score_gpt":0.3528028254099387,"score_spread":0.31966341862893577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004382415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051001683,0.0017242841,0.000099810866,0.08171704,0.0009879975,0.000507683,0.0000052182204,0.000056560213,0.90980124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65471786,0.15646894,0.006026546,0.039465833,0.0019347402,0.000005590533,0.00008719409,0.00003410389,0.14125915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992713,0.0001432814,0.00013266139,0.00013422518,0.00020545171,0.00011313251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928355,0.000065625565,0.00009441751,0.00016832654,0.00027328462,0.00011480856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043734058,0.0000564146,0.00013061333,0.000044036937,0.0003899059,0.000048077483,0.00038254057,0.000042232015,0.01169084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083151645,0.000067848276,0.000052912204,0.00075921713,0.000083564264,0.0009815376,0.0000151895865,0.00011102975,0.00055880524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012319914,0.0001562274,0.00012289599,0.00019078708,0.000012447072,4.5076882e-7,0.0026573713,0.000005876013,0.000008358981,0.8784985,0.082977705,0.035357047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000388104,0.00000942564,0.00007797588,0.00034670197,0.000033258137,2.6839567e-7,0.00026492184,4.4618105e-7,0.000010138027,0.00024664824,0.99889505,0.000076352386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029202128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031011128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91591734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082569495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083540566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98921263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004713773","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v32i3.5870","title":"In Absentia Trials and the Right to Defend: The Incorporation of a European Human Rights Principle into the Dutch Criminial Justice System","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to a fair trial; Law; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Convention; Political science; Project commissioning; Administration of justice; Criminal justice; Publishing","score_opus":0.0451853290645602,"score_gpt":0.3142188533675821,"score_spread":0.2690335243030219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004713773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5549612,0.022696784,0.00976578,0.026552558,0.0048152986,0.014399167,0.00006384696,0.0002321015,0.36651325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889238,0.009918191,0.00016957877,0.00021234844,0.00048317554,0.0000013235108,0.000005983567,0.0000079176025,0.00027768975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955548,0.0033971719,0.00043303813,0.00018547387,0.00030372167,0.00012577756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845,0.0005448213,0.00049316103,0.00031191023,0.00014978215,0.000050319923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008284645,0.000099739715,0.00036270355,0.000040216073,0.0011781284,0.00003559275,0.00052933156,0.000034653956,0.00004440665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026577868,0.000055253447,0.000098384146,0.00035688595,0.00044279255,0.0001895322,0.00011857604,0.00013767769,0.000030693365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018561876,0.000032995566,0.00001081087,0.0013544004,0.000028679382,0.000014713902,0.018386878,0.000013602401,0.00010440858,0.979004,0.0005072945,0.0003565468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048782953,0.000048324408,0.000051594456,0.001185557,0.0010031009,0.0000024223953,0.0033562004,0.000013909132,0.00004716478,0.00057055353,0.99314815,0.00008519293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01913691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024575407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99264085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005630806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003709724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99322355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005497808","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5939","title":"\"We are all Here to Stay\"; Addressing Aboriginal Title Claims after Delgamuukw v British Columbia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Media studies; Library science; Management; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.017449960063808702,"score_gpt":0.27018260702404273,"score_spread":0.252732646960234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005497808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041837543,0.11361347,0.00003784535,0.004952336,0.0012945415,0.00083656673,0.00019599119,0.00026511206,0.8369666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035350237,0.7083205,0.002650075,0.0034541392,0.00091377075,0.0000020463879,0.000024111221,0.000030828,0.2492543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921894,0.00008564359,0.00009819893,0.00017393033,0.00024363541,0.00017966128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999581,0.000017077198,0.000061865976,0.0001276757,0.000089447276,0.00012297707],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018148111,0.00006251488,0.00020231384,0.0000017807066,0.00029898374,0.000071523675,0.0002351154,0.00010917736,0.023427933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003819146,0.00009160056,0.00012478179,0.00019563774,0.00015204141,0.00012114826,0.000013603866,0.00011186457,0.00053706137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025401803,0.00013759271,0.0009065109,0.0014413958,0.00010225963,0.00009783389,0.007356354,0.000005704419,0.0000056880685,0.0087899715,0.9422082,0.0389231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075493626,0.00001023562,0.000036130707,0.0018593286,0.00005585986,7.757542e-7,0.00038198603,5.3818854e-7,7.5444547e-7,0.00019052724,0.99727213,0.00011623832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012115311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049198776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.594707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008429253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007214904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044136967","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i1.5855","title":"Recent Developments in the Law of Equitable Remedies: What Canada Can Do For You","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Supreme court; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04301465892440598,"score_gpt":0.26593507759359203,"score_spread":0.22292041866918605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044136967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015863255,0.24352826,0.00023202565,0.11448072,0.0027599295,0.00797418,0.0002935007,0.00007570089,0.6147924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34071487,0.65585,0.00088406453,0.0013798149,0.00007736598,0.0000041408516,0.000016474365,0.000007662023,0.0010656101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913496,0.00008217799,0.00018358443,0.00012698799,0.00027914075,0.0001931375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993489,0.00012406203,0.00015279665,0.00016901657,0.00015525223,0.000049998096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068477535,0.00006298594,0.00020061102,0.000011342558,0.00035629305,0.000016437956,0.0004435263,0.000035434627,0.00016030346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003215165,0.000056424753,0.00004667786,0.000291087,0.00013697562,0.00014148407,0.00003688449,0.000060191316,0.0000023376497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004268765,0.00006211484,0.000066415065,0.00051562535,0.000020447664,0.0000011383618,0.008253047,0.000008406113,0.000005631973,0.9787446,0.0069327904,0.005385498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120453944,0.0000087443395,0.000005638919,0.0006337753,0.00002657384,6.9392044e-8,0.0033591003,0.0000032834896,0.000021591937,0.00025020383,0.9955078,0.00006281068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48362687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86091334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019100425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020729024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5198117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123738432","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i4.5334","title":"International Law and the Practice of Legality: Stability and Change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; International law; Political science; Sources of international law; Municipal law; Statute; Public law; Public international law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03258657486503207,"score_gpt":0.29308632400806517,"score_spread":0.2604997491430331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123738432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02594304,0.0047959797,0.00009180538,0.017173048,0.0009299338,0.00074776565,0.000037145728,0.000024698,0.9502566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832107,0.015035332,0.00027084284,0.0008172778,0.0003103506,2.8956936e-7,0.000002714646,0.0000023768378,0.0003501261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991904,0.00025093343,0.000121780184,0.00011626568,0.00025402787,0.00006662496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989761,0.00026439416,0.00018513003,0.00010005241,0.0004390272,0.00003526794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012767001,0.000049213104,0.00016539828,0.000011179195,0.0003187936,0.000015121478,0.00020304631,0.00003394827,0.00040994733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007063777,0.000038773636,0.00004464861,0.000037029982,0.0019871662,0.00033313243,0.00005801116,0.00005612773,0.0000046249747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053109,0.000019844663,0.000020809352,0.00011088049,0.000028949045,4.1839593e-7,0.0039532557,4.023164e-9,0.000002911219,0.9956722,0.000037612637,0.000100008096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002640997,0.000023061957,0.000026125344,0.000260291,0.000069958,5.5034934e-7,0.00014623892,0.0000041825083,0.00003281163,0.01407912,0.9850515,0.000042047937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022419354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00594509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026567557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023478138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98409045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124426488","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i1.5588","title":"The Needs of the Many and the Needs of the Few: A New System of Public Interest Intervention for New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Adversarial system; Intervention (counseling); Public interest; Order (exchange); Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fair dealing; Balance (ability); Public relations; Business; Sociology; Legislature; Psychology","score_opus":0.02554518457729594,"score_gpt":0.2556189662009864,"score_spread":0.23007378162369047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124426488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48405337,0.17447506,0.006460746,0.27009314,0.007222361,0.012285231,0.00012569242,0.00014213106,0.045142252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771081,0.018454779,0.000027374635,0.000044706358,0.0001859319,5.4125593e-7,9.1445247e-7,0.000005331861,0.004172316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988142,0.0003830061,0.00035733441,0.00007306322,0.0002407331,0.00013165851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984385,0.00028490095,0.0007119335,0.0003111884,0.00019850992,0.000054992535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017169862,0.00008833768,0.0003211786,0.000034660294,0.00039426112,0.00002281986,0.0006712769,0.00006614459,0.000029837249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008206542,0.000046502802,0.00038235047,0.00044698897,0.00059686776,0.00012668208,0.0001199879,0.00009371472,6.938331e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090175316,0.00003673194,0.00062326586,0.0009252766,0.00011613732,2.355506e-8,0.0111945355,0.0000024548895,0.00004088502,0.9662878,0.0030466788,0.017636014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007912734,0.000045454668,0.00019343142,0.002241055,0.0002501729,5.308219e-7,0.0039497814,0.0000340621,0.000092378476,0.0003451348,0.9920086,0.000048120684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009075745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008521799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98896194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056542245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012479626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158256369","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5521","title":"The Democratic Challenge of Incorporation: International Human Rights Treaties and National Constitutions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Treaty; Political science; Democracy; Law; State (computer science); International community; International human rights law; Supreme court; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.021827669595668803,"score_gpt":0.2848495493933192,"score_spread":0.2630218797976504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158256369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009706049,0.004220848,0.0023347363,0.007198674,0.0009544636,0.0005375048,0.000038779806,0.00003852037,0.9749704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900831,0.008203283,0.00030182177,0.000034654237,0.0001633272,2.59094e-7,0.000024254376,0.0000018015329,0.0011875029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916816,0.00007006342,0.00020326352,0.00008794936,0.00039792075,0.000072633666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890965,0.00021065919,0.00025176315,0.00005592356,0.00053734815,0.000034669898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088390824,0.000053052754,0.00011475046,0.000036311743,0.00093003956,0.000011502659,0.00018075672,0.000042468935,0.000081230886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040255112,0.000046858546,0.00005298764,0.0000962678,0.00061876385,0.00018973154,0.000020587904,0.000050610455,0.000004047289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006150996,0.000025345456,0.00016464647,0.000041770763,0.000026722699,5.9902356e-7,0.00036266862,0.0000019331094,0.000012584519,0.9988657,0.0002680103,0.00022381888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016057031,0.000023289187,0.00017810437,0.00034872227,0.00003396353,4.697467e-7,0.000131679,0.000011447513,0.00005256533,0.0649818,0.9340185,0.00005889681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026343937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019317748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008291203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073868105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210337685","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v52i4.7400","title":"Dissonance between Fact and Law: The Example of Visual Artistic Practice and Income Tax Concessions for Peak Copyright","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Common law copyright; Statute; Legislation; Income tax; Law; Tax law; Fair use; Economics; Common law; Law and economics; Double taxation; Public economics; Political science; Intellectual property; Copyright law","score_opus":0.02690961963721568,"score_gpt":0.25162978113126644,"score_spread":0.22472016149405077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210337685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4175191,0.2275612,0.018977715,0.03552533,0.0045530205,0.016372502,0.0012119798,0.00053665705,0.2777425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474216,0.004096292,0.00013041479,0.00052585447,0.0001444469,0.0000022189704,0.000031166255,0.000010539863,0.00031688542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917996,0.000058231508,0.00021943566,0.00021806553,0.00019244505,0.00013187103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986772,0.0005941211,0.00037574608,0.00015819295,0.00017761199,0.000017114953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056909927,0.00011844037,0.00035177197,0.00003145217,0.000711368,0.00003236241,0.00024004055,0.000026228525,0.000691572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011907398,0.00008768827,0.000068989466,0.0002158785,0.00025509924,0.00050025375,0.00029432838,0.00013247893,0.000005364108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058864127,0.00033705222,0.0016549459,0.011961932,0.00033844577,0.000009073419,0.0010949203,0.00000904988,0.00047892734,0.9286839,0.045448944,0.0093942145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030506006,0.000071355316,0.00018325108,0.0004241509,0.00032851408,0.0000010104144,0.00013250015,0.0007333144,0.000022911194,0.00094798626,0.99672884,0.00012111872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065890597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020201798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9512799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001902885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018869816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99607307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372080422","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i3-4.5810","title":"Protecting Rights in Common Law Constitutional Systems; a Framework for a Comparative Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Common law; Constitution; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Legislature; Human rights; Constitutional review; Fundamental rights; Comparative law; Politics; Democracy; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.0721219157603624,"score_gpt":0.314255935206012,"score_spread":0.2421340194456496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372080422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06313842,0.10477647,0.012332655,0.0041869185,0.00388686,0.02204264,0.00020661567,0.00034979286,0.7890796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978145,0.001544569,0.00039780833,0.000053246466,0.00013307214,0.00000771417,0.0000019780705,0.0000014244761,0.00004573196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987438,0.00034041947,0.00024217388,0.00020015611,0.00028952077,0.00018397893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990357,0.00043238298,0.00018664532,0.00009177137,0.00019666554,0.00005682091],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069117313,0.00010534861,0.00049342454,0.000030676834,0.0014440494,0.000015770136,0.00020848287,0.00006764848,0.00008297005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037007663,0.000106945976,0.00009601277,0.00030857185,0.0012259241,0.00013599484,0.000033485438,0.00016645477,0.000024554689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015563131,0.00019867961,0.00035739725,0.00015956088,0.000046704834,0.0000046366645,0.0037019434,0.000023075312,4.998919e-7,0.99536204,0.00010668387,0.000023195504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046356054,0.0001060839,0.000022367183,0.0032766382,0.00010471291,6.2375153e-7,0.0036999357,0.000036968235,0.0000022232873,0.035974577,0.95613295,0.00017938478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038258933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028815808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013786444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004789405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387652472","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v54i1.8446","title":"The Criminal Law, the Intelligence and Security Act and the Protective Security Requirements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Criminal law; Statute; Political science; Criminal code; Common law; Legislature; Legislative history; Politics","score_opus":0.04387486937391837,"score_gpt":0.2984201245111002,"score_spread":0.25454525513718185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387652472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20302516,0.23214757,0.0055908794,0.15115723,0.006929051,0.031702816,0.00028394102,0.0013241896,0.36783916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.746575,0.25278044,0.00002119069,0.0003313796,0.00016326646,0.000002918307,0.0000034546258,0.000007151818,0.0001152341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813277,0.0009717802,0.00015947949,0.00021536645,0.00032220923,0.00019838064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987329,0.00062459917,0.00018261358,0.00025863093,0.0001413337,0.00005989645],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036844495,0.00010206763,0.00018084329,0.000014074239,0.0025057693,0.00007480188,0.00046140084,0.000044483808,0.00001965202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002677527,0.000059777332,0.00006681808,0.00030927366,0.00201366,0.00023835337,0.00018258068,0.00024965286,0.000026436857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013499922,0.000014694777,0.00001540644,0.0008070416,0.000038086557,0.0000046332916,0.026861554,7.591458e-7,0.0000047539315,0.96597844,0.0004137172,0.005725907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017812694,0.000065116656,0.000037073376,0.00070157903,0.00035793692,0.0000020374632,0.018455185,0.000075659234,0.00004058952,0.017263684,0.96271145,0.000111543966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009692932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058926987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96229774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035702822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042954776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410144503","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v55i2.9803","title":"Navigating Towards an Airworthy Protection Regime for New Zealand's Airline Passengers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Advertising; Political science; Publishing; Aeronautics; Business; Media studies; Engineering; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.020109284044250098,"score_gpt":0.30061366792152455,"score_spread":0.28050438387727444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410144503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080145575,0.028493922,0.24454822,0.3257587,0.01742294,0.02105797,0.00026762992,0.0018880956,0.28041697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83657974,0.07722491,0.021921722,0.0028260492,0.0038212258,0.000014454479,0.00049154303,0.000059086007,0.05706125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991738,0.000115338924,0.0001715841,0.0001853569,0.00021796308,0.00013596039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999263,0.00005155317,0.0001959864,0.00011447815,0.00030668138,0.000068289766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000629953,0.00008044804,0.00020193933,0.000020357273,0.00039374354,0.000018364877,0.00021641109,0.0000844763,0.000083715735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000806136,0.000090310255,0.0001257959,0.00023674406,0.000073606694,0.00026284478,0.00001660556,0.000113749134,0.0000062342506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006293634,0.000060581817,0.000100807556,0.0005604944,0.00005219202,8.516896e-7,0.001400987,0.000039638475,0.000104360035,0.94080883,0.0030528132,0.053755514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026657144,0.000053769094,0.00003104689,0.0017883534,0.00007425016,1.0753727e-7,0.00014660203,0.00008856351,0.00018283792,0.0036749528,0.9936032,0.000089727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028632533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006237834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013237492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022032831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9778359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W822600774","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v44i3/4.4982","title":"Māui And The People Of The North","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.006742660316217058,"score_gpt":0.20047318462312808,"score_spread":0.193730524306911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W822600774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4659379,0.09390607,0.000046724595,0.04076817,0.0023452763,0.0036377213,0.000033943412,0.00007968407,0.3932445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94675887,0.051578533,0.000047631947,0.00025601388,0.00005431612,4.644526e-7,6.8485946e-7,0.0000023446437,0.001301121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.00020064495,0.00009776798,0.000078329984,0.00018950031,0.00009198938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994128,0.00011056132,0.00013482095,0.000154865,0.00015138251,0.00003561436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026962973,0.00004960889,0.00020556638,0.000005882587,0.00043661697,0.0000071585873,0.00033813997,0.00003186863,0.00023910122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004714911,0.000032785498,0.0000949033,0.00023984416,0.00085040997,0.000093530056,0.00007166172,0.000056969253,0.00001609214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001794064,0.000026294687,0.005807516,0.00048186397,0.00002930285,2.4236095e-7,0.009975426,9.39033e-7,0.000003741874,0.9762052,0.0060574096,0.0013940918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015527157,0.000010211545,0.001630511,0.00021071506,0.000075397315,1.305348e-7,0.00036144,0.0000014343132,0.0000021035385,0.0013295573,0.9961825,0.0000407507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06679624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0329027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99012506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002497602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057684363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}