{"meta":{"query_hash":"c79d541ba869","filters":{"venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review"},"cohort_total":38,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"exported":38,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c79d541ba869","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Victoria+University+of+Wellington+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W141257998","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5516","title":"Democratising or Demonising the World Heritage Convention?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Treaty; Political science; Legitimacy; Democratic legitimacy; Democracy; Sovereignty; Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0668074836086298,"score_gpt":0.25057774953867323,"score_spread":0.18377026593004342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141257998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040302213,0.007497426,0.012294685,0.32984337,0.0018217686,0.00010771569,0.000058383106,0.00011574935,0.6079586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89444447,0.004101991,0.004686723,0.045215108,0.00115385,0.00014465359,0.00005611271,0.00015133074,0.050045803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985386,0.008293248,0.00048194523,0.0014993913,0.0021550297,0.002184314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99158925,0.004762631,0.0011181318,0.0011787821,0.00077014434,0.0005810683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01914421,0.00026896116,0.00037382165,0.0008837891,0.006985874,0.012783934,0.0012107216,0.0066575375,0.007311124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026634442,0.0002915087,0.0004301811,0.0012842634,0.019952165,0.015840936,0.0056771226,0.008881079,0.0011065318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060195616,0.000010912625,0.00018634222,0.000026326714,0.0000026448147,0.000036215806,0.0024720812,0.00013888195,0.00011270991,0.9849851,0.0053451266,0.006677593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030088122,0.00002985984,0.00086656114,0.0003193167,0.000012895442,0.00010375201,0.005457411,0.00041469513,0.0005302787,0.57528925,0.41690388,0.00004196008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017023098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021307055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01914421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073592807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014449808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10124546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585351093","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5048","title":"The Privy Council as the Final Court for the British Empire","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Empire; Section (typography); Work (physics); High Court; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.052886702333518804,"score_gpt":0.28416348668682817,"score_spread":0.23127678435330937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585351093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19502647,0.013236932,0.0030553138,0.10619618,0.0016038895,0.00010839637,0.00038277602,0.00012045668,0.68026954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789144,0.0016423264,0.0010671982,0.009130921,0.00016811711,0.000030293464,0.000082149134,0.00006432678,0.10890014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990568,0.0027057515,0.00034554038,0.0009863154,0.0027226384,0.0026717607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930607,0.002436478,0.00038878887,0.00047811522,0.0023827772,0.0012531268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00569666,0.00013980448,0.00034495068,0.0011908193,0.012634576,0.01319902,0.00092448114,0.005925615,0.0048390287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016878383,0.000567703,0.00023029497,0.002059853,0.0073853442,0.0025823358,0.0020895994,0.00725071,0.0007543241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058142126,0.000025760757,0.004258687,0.0000801956,0.000016978094,0.00060151145,0.0059036654,0.00059240556,0.00063324545,0.8787327,0.092665225,0.016431516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055726254,0.00007788705,0.026113342,0.0004217,0.000065374654,0.00036655756,0.008999107,0.0011168713,0.0009254699,0.038571656,0.92315173,0.00013452633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5271162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7822551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5271162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02198478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026943954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95133746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201809459","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5396","title":"Book Review: Human Rights in the South Pacific – Challenges and Changes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022417580605305503,"score_gpt":0.2528157274758621,"score_spread":0.23039814687055662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201809459","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031688504,0.8016436,0.00042983773,0.06542742,0.028781014,0.000072462935,0.00017945423,0.000055972327,0.10309336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035596741,0.78770465,0.00052457594,0.021249061,0.0113368295,0.00009651056,0.00023522503,0.00006904794,0.17522438],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883205,0.00023164145,0.000057708472,0.000094564435,0.0007167844,0.000067179244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962807,0.001342688,0.00023397694,0.00007609403,0.0018440582,0.00022243819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012716958,0.0007489563,0.0010137217,0.0024056872,0.0012554898,0.0033059102,0.0011749325,0.0020605763,0.02695128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00429119,0.0003815077,0.0003264143,0.005709493,0.0015406851,0.0033383726,0.0010280076,0.0036565443,0.011489477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003423343,0.0000054716234,0.000028431074,0.0006434412,0.0000046295395,0.00002280463,0.00011243388,0.000060148643,0.000029068542,0.0033406788,0.9623964,0.03335295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025052018,0.000004777709,0.00016560948,0.00093909964,0.0000040142045,0.00005773604,0.00013922581,0.000016274234,0.000015360894,0.0008218257,0.99782926,0.0000043688124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02373763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05277034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02695128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038756798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009935312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090161026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210338013","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5228","title":"Why Legal History Matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Project commissioning; Publishing; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0128029408878248,"score_gpt":0.22982842293614558,"score_spread":0.21702548204832078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210338013","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022883802,0.12586759,0.0005905539,0.8087694,0.005902359,0.000016060087,0.00007118072,0.000021687414,0.056472752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18603563,0.13123584,0.0007735736,0.6101393,0.013713163,0.000056215515,0.00019529555,0.00014498677,0.05770605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98351604,0.006675603,0.0008004129,0.0014285549,0.0052579064,0.0023214696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627195,0.02290177,0.0020943996,0.0010396934,0.0088689225,0.0023757736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01606259,0.00030109135,0.000854712,0.0030186623,0.0066625825,0.011435123,0.00161389,0.011408316,0.009888232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05022538,0.0007664081,0.0005036905,0.0025080207,0.020744009,0.014995241,0.00313072,0.011225364,0.0026608394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017358785,0.000014957889,0.0008393905,0.00054743927,0.000028798064,0.00022723459,0.006500287,0.00011438807,0.00015753986,0.4952823,0.4649178,0.03135251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009217697,0.00000894658,0.0015849032,0.0011577422,0.000015071786,0.00015139558,0.0047889836,0.000059496135,0.000092332215,0.09993069,0.8921759,0.00002522836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12246003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15854244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12246003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016575346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02278958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24349451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213989475","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5214","title":"Informal Land Titles: Snowden v Baker (1844)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Statutory law; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); High Court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014406159355908586,"score_gpt":0.26081987261241735,"score_spread":0.24641371325650877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213989475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16215737,0.01751157,0.0028653909,0.035190895,0.00095485605,0.0001594069,0.00046734483,0.000044744116,0.78064835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7321208,0.006516959,0.0019906731,0.036134306,0.0007945518,0.00019574765,0.00017869083,0.000035770998,0.22203256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975568,0.0004849175,0.00011471693,0.00029621331,0.00087154843,0.0006757345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854255,0.0007272095,0.00022766144,0.0000710507,0.0003087435,0.00012266875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022317308,0.0002173856,0.00024947646,0.001098132,0.0042150514,0.0029280821,0.0008361867,0.004767978,0.0034948045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058739134,0.00036297672,0.00025652003,0.0013000086,0.007246486,0.0017068019,0.0020119594,0.0026729654,0.00055274466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031235646,0.000014534877,0.0034446125,0.00011949845,0.000009011252,0.0013284781,0.014010867,0.00016333112,0.00028468046,0.87738335,0.08196051,0.021249859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040604933,0.00005538805,0.016143465,0.0005529873,0.000023195995,0.00064763374,0.0034837641,0.00011428177,0.00046255573,0.058120508,0.92030525,0.00005029868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24397095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3731343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24397095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064697852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008547106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4851017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218652726","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i2.5264","title":"Immigration Bill 2007: Special Advocates and the Right to be Heard","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mirroring; Immigration; Appeal; Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Human rights; Subject (documents); Immigration law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01922557278183171,"score_gpt":0.2581632762789021,"score_spread":0.23893770349707041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218652726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021893905,0.007807106,0.0025497242,0.45848322,0.006212901,0.00038628152,0.00043042522,0.00019160747,0.50204474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17208841,0.0049934657,0.004955615,0.5183658,0.0034120707,0.0010134594,0.00048742344,0.00013919733,0.29454458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786632,0.0044117062,0.0020861635,0.00215055,0.008360147,0.004328175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98299223,0.0089363465,0.0014233456,0.0013473959,0.0033550938,0.001945583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018622926,0.00052525307,0.00083508115,0.0012295442,0.0076614833,0.0095083695,0.0024519197,0.03480372,0.008706955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04356077,0.0013695987,0.0012548628,0.00096910447,0.00929833,0.004607717,0.006827158,0.019679334,0.0028704582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003464273,0.000060753522,0.0015306073,0.00013810996,0.000013092291,0.00068916095,0.0038732362,0.00007792504,0.0005122431,0.69364715,0.28044537,0.018977711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084927924,0.000076715376,0.00730619,0.00084995624,0.00004160665,0.00072973524,0.0016076415,0.0001461964,0.0005013991,0.024835574,0.963741,0.000078956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07393283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08942606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07393283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007543145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03271365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14700496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219607269","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v39i2.5464","title":"Freedom of Expression, Commercial Expression and Tobacco in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Supreme court; Freedom of expression; Law; Flexibility (engineering); Value (mathematics); Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Economics; Computer science; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.011249540627606525,"score_gpt":0.18831942828267745,"score_spread":0.17706988765507092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219607269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15514933,0.010790893,0.0013674543,0.066061154,0.00041208413,0.0001881197,0.0005282195,0.000053193584,0.7654495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8580468,0.0051198574,0.00095243094,0.01779213,0.000111582995,0.000069575726,0.00017798327,0.000033534492,0.11769615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948112,0.0003096852,0.00015035085,0.00043133978,0.0021956463,0.0021017825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502254,0.0018712649,0.00029782834,0.00022307037,0.0014874657,0.0010978557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023728453,0.0002643981,0.0004738798,0.0018410331,0.021783851,0.00953022,0.001971842,0.0057323254,0.0110535575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076504736,0.0005062869,0.0006344703,0.0026877823,0.00961553,0.0019283877,0.0039890087,0.0069978987,0.00038702777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000636904,0.000088183166,0.014942517,0.00014080455,0.00003812544,0.0013376921,0.009636864,0.00081982854,0.0006021309,0.9043053,0.03537865,0.032646164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013976738,0.00009070644,0.09430723,0.0009243872,0.00020796797,0.0007503641,0.024335789,0.0044080447,0.001918199,0.11599245,0.7565694,0.0003556761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99641645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087830774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087830774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12000546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63725984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231547810","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5412","title":"The State of Judicial Scrutiny of Public Contracting in New Zealand and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Procurement; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Public administration; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Public law; Government procurement; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.023303310904248944,"score_gpt":0.2576232751249873,"score_spread":0.23431996422073834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231547810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37389615,0.05003474,0.00173164,0.16009368,0.0008129372,0.00024847116,0.00045924212,0.00010148442,0.41262165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96998066,0.008966927,0.0008772095,0.008205852,0.0002395597,0.00004839375,0.00008789181,0.000032616692,0.011560866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9634482,0.0033699763,0.0015623168,0.0029306184,0.020446038,0.008242765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508177,0.01897331,0.0053298,0.0018190283,0.019688878,0.0033712497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015714679,0.00029848015,0.0009348833,0.0059805796,0.019368533,0.017773371,0.004150404,0.006866327,0.0036857266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07243038,0.0008539277,0.00080550654,0.007050364,0.02066061,0.0031390942,0.003855501,0.0067975125,0.0001707078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028784267,0.000108407105,0.02669001,0.000881038,0.00028621987,0.0023346073,0.041844636,0.0021784615,0.002900841,0.74884886,0.060188185,0.11345102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026291292,0.00015637564,0.2099848,0.0028353098,0.0005321553,0.0008632433,0.041901674,0.0035945717,0.0027857546,0.060090624,0.67618227,0.00081026217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98611337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98984736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15226677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15226677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18710765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308837678","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5386","title":"A Pacific Human Rights Mechanism: Specific Challenges and Requirements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Human rights; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Project commissioning; Key (lock); Political science; Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Business; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Social science; Computer security; Finance; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03629845025561608,"score_gpt":0.2645375673411293,"score_spread":0.22823911708551325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2308837678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08358756,0.0056363563,0.041097067,0.31862244,0.0010740412,0.0013820647,0.00013125564,0.00016297401,0.5483063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779145,0.0042447294,0.045046132,0.03828825,0.0006248756,0.0014601517,0.000109504275,0.00012436716,0.032187577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9519188,0.02207087,0.003467127,0.0032293457,0.012942747,0.006371199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466099,0.033134084,0.0027633694,0.0025775398,0.011047797,0.003867287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05610413,0.00049495033,0.001036222,0.0013652614,0.012737582,0.019642483,0.0051297583,0.014593251,0.004793463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060757738,0.0011597461,0.001002202,0.0013144009,0.02066465,0.01721744,0.010259583,0.020333698,0.00053391745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001319263,0.000050750514,0.0015045194,0.00031830283,0.000014752279,0.0010977797,0.008273962,0.0008016049,0.0005090143,0.9681313,0.0059743486,0.013310439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008721316,0.00022551171,0.0065965997,0.0030312557,0.000098995995,0.002875295,0.06636461,0.0033907683,0.0024003596,0.47296214,0.44169706,0.00027027668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030920982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035491195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05610413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008606719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05618508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2967106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338978280","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i2.4918","title":"The Implications of a Supreme Law Bill Of Rights for New Zealand Judicial Appointments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","score_opus":0.03882758577520705,"score_gpt":0.2898765720509398,"score_spread":0.25104898627573274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338978280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098920636,0.0045242286,0.0067894435,0.2747216,0.0023137918,0.00042318765,0.00021817909,0.00009383336,0.6119951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541329,0.002581006,0.007975912,0.03811934,0.0010964463,0.00020943374,0.000082336344,0.00005659364,0.09574602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702204,0.006594487,0.0020009622,0.0034750206,0.010480117,0.007229123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796952,0.0092262495,0.0025623203,0.0015875798,0.004736141,0.0021925268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02279848,0.0002631595,0.00071047636,0.0016081532,0.01409263,0.014183769,0.0030257225,0.010582949,0.0064841337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07440099,0.00089884584,0.001032298,0.0013744712,0.018405667,0.0055805235,0.0047804145,0.017295897,0.0008430813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020591628,0.000017888713,0.00098628,0.000030746636,0.000005791415,0.0004803184,0.0036988957,0.0002181822,0.00035374283,0.97823584,0.009474914,0.0064768638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022785175,0.00019509817,0.02940811,0.0009622906,0.000100805904,0.0008271536,0.009814406,0.0022924312,0.00091871375,0.250009,0.7049438,0.00030042118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5124191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6636686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5124191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037240777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059982717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347051369","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5519","title":"Hegemonic Federalism: The Democratic Implications of the UN Security Council's \"Legislative\" Phase","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Federalism; Public administration; Democracy; Legislation; Hegemony; Government (linguistics); Security council; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.031430712782297955,"score_gpt":0.289482856809323,"score_spread":0.25805214402702503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347051369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07160834,0.0016280405,0.016702928,0.098366715,0.0005965603,0.000081313185,0.000052540156,0.00006332,0.8109002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796126,0.00042186663,0.0021404221,0.004830633,0.00015023796,0.000049019054,0.000015800977,0.000017659519,0.01276176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990908,0.004326106,0.00014576754,0.00062154303,0.0021501195,0.0018484034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963207,0.0020470102,0.00024257562,0.00037786126,0.0006402986,0.00037157367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010172082,0.00018219193,0.00024134874,0.0010587102,0.013381974,0.0075449273,0.0007142829,0.0026801508,0.0022379903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011636585,0.00025201414,0.00027848833,0.0010458342,0.023750124,0.003971598,0.0026938822,0.005825729,0.00014696269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026478695,0.0000032988455,0.000103897866,0.0000022379443,6.9036395e-7,0.000011769269,0.0020606425,0.00007304762,0.000029806011,0.9951232,0.001023239,0.0015655549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003269271,0.000025980473,0.002875834,0.000081633116,0.000011719019,0.000056837347,0.00667729,0.0015968424,0.00037286093,0.8127828,0.17544934,0.000036079568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18680792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2810687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18680792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02400054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023925982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3714412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414343126","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i2.5845","title":"The Patentability of Human Beings: The Effect of a Proposed Exclusion in the Patents Act 1953","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Project commissioning; Patent law; Publishing; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Economics; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.051507120759562625,"score_gpt":0.2169979599029825,"score_spread":0.1654908391434199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414343126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09574369,0.005568352,0.010823447,0.20586447,0.001440761,0.00015733986,0.00042925728,0.00007442337,0.67989826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828301,0.0027665582,0.0041642557,0.074826874,0.0015373124,0.0002854412,0.000089117304,0.00003911359,0.033461325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846837,0.0046346732,0.0010669396,0.0016455038,0.005717665,0.0022515934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9497386,0.04142656,0.0028787735,0.0018619366,0.003205476,0.00088857097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019356515,0.0004795858,0.0009500952,0.00196626,0.008665645,0.009739451,0.0021755665,0.022607516,0.0037362985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046143077,0.00051521236,0.0019787636,0.0019092779,0.029647594,0.0061081303,0.0052484972,0.015161498,0.0007283887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025911433,0.000017992765,0.0005013685,0.000018377867,0.000008843373,0.00013529805,0.0011891971,0.00018549873,0.000105768115,0.9909377,0.0047774124,0.0020967305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028676854,0.00012702482,0.0071248487,0.00059202674,0.00020687295,0.00033603303,0.0019919458,0.0017578257,0.0014117288,0.7785323,0.20747678,0.00015578627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07097158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05108712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07097158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008933783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016584659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14111698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550297742","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5383","title":"Legal Pluralism, Customary Law and Human Rights in Francophone African Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"French; Human rights; Charter; Political science; Legal pluralism; Colonialism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Comparative law; Geography; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00787781370084571,"score_gpt":0.23692712362302998,"score_spread":0.22904930992218428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550297742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42067146,0.17559648,0.0011813733,0.041059088,0.00022327877,0.000029529865,0.000050370534,0.00000746607,0.361181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796188,0.014437523,0.00015814426,0.0010028123,0.000057568872,0.000009964521,0.000009021102,0.0000014326588,0.004704868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691784,0.0016175607,0.0001438708,0.00015780155,0.00038311875,0.00077970815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669695,0.0021407926,0.0005510241,0.00012105478,0.0002897375,0.00020040954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047429414,0.00017681795,0.00026150802,0.0019240993,0.0057076523,0.0046543456,0.00045752173,0.001975709,0.0017874193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045454754,0.0001453016,0.00016277691,0.0026616203,0.015107283,0.0036359832,0.0021659464,0.0013686306,0.00005588077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014703581,0.000026372896,0.0030052,0.0002083066,0.0000099604285,0.0005925561,0.017176112,0.00029247548,0.00011773768,0.95456266,0.0025779223,0.021416083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006532569,0.000129125,0.08448792,0.005297587,0.00006651281,0.0015089916,0.09327829,0.00081036414,0.0006462663,0.3569025,0.45670453,0.00010255546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11443461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13400708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11443461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007469773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007463126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22753704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604885731","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i2.4743","title":"Law School as Social Innovation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; New Zealand Law Foundation","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Mandate; Project commissioning; Legal education; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Publishing; Public relations; Resilience (materials science); Sociology; Law; Social science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05594210053858727,"score_gpt":0.2648109310513972,"score_spread":0.2088688305128099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604885731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02289984,0.011624326,0.009461774,0.1209052,0.001263706,0.00016226823,0.00006582009,0.00014028647,0.8334768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89474887,0.006899927,0.0034786055,0.009777479,0.0010314117,0.00018656524,0.00005305216,0.000053665954,0.08377036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943433,0.003174637,0.00013506206,0.0006186069,0.0008186356,0.0009099062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443626,0.0022115267,0.0005422485,0.0007941719,0.00075520214,0.0012605016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005474467,0.00024856615,0.00040264908,0.0016905867,0.006839238,0.011426814,0.0011140832,0.004432067,0.0119070085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062759514,0.00019093219,0.00035570504,0.0015601038,0.029067481,0.008213593,0.009223831,0.0038780721,0.0011271642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018596688,0.00002290703,0.00014804686,0.000028781931,0.0000024005478,0.000027463333,0.001963642,0.00014240421,0.000022616374,0.9813021,0.005467886,0.010869872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010148869,0.000030943374,0.0006381578,0.0001928741,0.0000035962148,0.00004235811,0.0034478325,0.00035144872,0.000058730395,0.53705806,0.45815682,0.000009027959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011542079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015454147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119070085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011130276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016929906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08075619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624364408","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5945","title":"Search for Principle - The Government's Liability in Negligence for the Careless Exercise of its Statutory Powers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Project commissioning; Liability; Government (linguistics); Law; Publishing; Business; Strict liability; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02710318604166993,"score_gpt":0.3033416156082833,"score_spread":0.2762384295666134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624364408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03826091,0.010312541,0.07634649,0.29240417,0.0011457767,0.00031289592,0.00022157964,0.00012072713,0.580875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89647657,0.0032935583,0.037954506,0.032163274,0.0011823714,0.00032082415,0.00007101227,0.000044743334,0.028493103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99020547,0.0034370313,0.00054152356,0.0012344765,0.003708427,0.00087300723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897424,0.006262132,0.00087928347,0.0009831312,0.0017580613,0.0003750248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016652292,0.00035279107,0.0009326959,0.0018687182,0.00482003,0.0058016847,0.0020532238,0.008967804,0.0026939858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019504758,0.0005751613,0.0012084299,0.00096028147,0.035209153,0.0069406694,0.0034921698,0.012624789,0.00077681243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019977992,0.000008465424,0.00007669424,0.000017662956,0.0000027395965,0.00003398146,0.00040216098,0.000109372704,0.000052585707,0.9963174,0.0017540443,0.0012229336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014723012,0.000015157204,0.00028767504,0.00011252245,0.000006455938,0.00010033909,0.00031078103,0.00042407837,0.00012274954,0.97598755,0.022607146,0.000010884244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012833725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013758565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016652292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009758228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019397605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08806676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910877383","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i3.5327","title":"Litigating Climate Change – Of Politics and Political Questions: A Comparative Analysis of Justiciability of Climate Change in the United States and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Political question; Political science; Politics; Law; Context (archaeology); Climate change; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03288232814075758,"score_gpt":0.270340585075876,"score_spread":0.2374582569351184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910877383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4689228,0.016376223,0.001115678,0.026732916,0.00016611391,0.00011337852,0.00039844017,0.000024396435,0.4861501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98743886,0.0044016102,0.00021004354,0.0019465307,0.00002179832,0.000016763779,0.00010571094,0.000013121163,0.0058456655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895251,0.0011179574,0.00018854541,0.00044302575,0.0049746144,0.0037507822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98815036,0.004105379,0.00068147515,0.00024873143,0.0055036983,0.0013104297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004027408,0.00017820827,0.00074666523,0.0039590704,0.017444365,0.011578459,0.0016954553,0.0022610677,0.0040554414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017407387,0.00030018963,0.00059665344,0.007988237,0.011034678,0.0022364552,0.0034789962,0.003165416,0.00013543759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015050868,0.000121136356,0.04851248,0.00036541102,0.00024156085,0.001057618,0.05174262,0.0038675733,0.0008465327,0.82839143,0.02524651,0.039456524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011524454,0.00007975018,0.373128,0.0012035947,0.00054583594,0.00044060842,0.16657613,0.00450337,0.0011343972,0.057295643,0.39463624,0.0003412319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99420196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99744546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13080388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13080388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1924323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94905305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949360093","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i3.4898","title":"The Crown's Relationship with Tribal Peoples and the Legal Dynamics for the Resolution of Historical and Contemporary Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Legalism (Western philosophy); Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Ceremony; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.01895321507556511,"score_gpt":0.2148043660116618,"score_spread":0.1958511509360967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949360093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1397681,0.021092711,0.0031260182,0.066411264,0.00039160321,0.000052198877,0.000021429036,0.000026901214,0.76910985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819443,0.002406928,0.0005022982,0.0015941763,0.00015427008,0.000016454154,0.000003975023,0.0000110517285,0.013366462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922085,0.0032605878,0.00024181067,0.00064441346,0.0018241839,0.0018204908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548894,0.0022841475,0.00045734565,0.00044614988,0.0008126682,0.0005107324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008817337,0.00017745708,0.00040210286,0.0016495506,0.019321207,0.01267312,0.001779705,0.005038458,0.0040162704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115575185,0.00029355666,0.00024644894,0.0015507975,0.08139329,0.0050431956,0.005132728,0.0056074033,0.00029346655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046700748,0.00000929652,0.0006014252,0.00004083107,0.00000448811,0.00035871784,0.05740646,0.0000788427,0.00016155254,0.9331613,0.0019358649,0.0062364535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018101997,0.000050154256,0.008334927,0.0008362714,0.000031455038,0.00075680483,0.15744449,0.0004337586,0.00033692774,0.3200213,0.5116669,0.00006886838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1995308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31130823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1995308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016180897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020611944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39673877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949536135","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i4.5333","title":"Foreword: The Dynamic Evolution of International Law – Rise or Decline?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo; Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; New Zealand Law Foundation; National University of Singapore; York University","keywords":"Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Field (mathematics); International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014964126067174906,"score_gpt":0.2810331926632186,"score_spread":0.2660690665960437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949536135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004228387,0.18316233,0.0006646368,0.40173241,0.37751606,0.000059032132,0.00034376426,0.00007106829,0.036027838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015034511,0.15277338,0.0010359548,0.30998784,0.37425458,0.00018289586,0.0006134116,0.0004322987,0.14568524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967348,0.0007838041,0.0002384584,0.000376847,0.001551762,0.00031423662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905413,0.0038076392,0.0007380376,0.00047575773,0.003784315,0.0006529876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028266194,0.0010632657,0.0016274072,0.0030236463,0.003997568,0.013123537,0.001851566,0.007880699,0.0212626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01649495,0.0006337297,0.00079577847,0.003453484,0.0061599826,0.008865156,0.0028858453,0.012560867,0.012179982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049790347,0.0000034552993,0.000027875263,0.00013339966,0.000003476175,0.0000102877275,0.00009301019,0.000010479415,0.00003692594,0.0052523506,0.98961467,0.0048091714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046081664,0.0000099654935,0.00035146248,0.0010212538,0.000009493085,0.00004936169,0.00044529617,0.000028893946,0.000047637568,0.0039362963,0.99408406,0.000011596613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023146795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032216046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023146795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067436765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077843694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071130455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950114440","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i3.4735","title":"Fiducia in Public Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Private law; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Public law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0487478028784544,"score_gpt":0.30280212028204084,"score_spread":0.2540543174035864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950114440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011780915,0.12664215,0.023496626,0.11289412,0.001673337,0.0000846771,0.00008943361,0.000084830834,0.723254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8005231,0.04540847,0.008348593,0.050343294,0.002344447,0.00022557029,0.00011262814,0.00011064571,0.09258326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859147,0.006482431,0.00052074535,0.0012754144,0.003850946,0.0019557055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183196,0.0046347403,0.0006176366,0.0008750398,0.0016761298,0.0003644881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012172441,0.00034709458,0.0006923127,0.003208947,0.006846199,0.010580003,0.0016428205,0.00877423,0.005001487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017451312,0.000489125,0.0007898208,0.0024657864,0.031235553,0.008731424,0.0039618677,0.011088504,0.0009486159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6182986e-7,0.0000031939012,0.00003676675,0.000017795728,0.000001247488,0.000008693722,0.00028285495,0.000040658408,0.0000067373253,0.9938022,0.003183307,0.0026159023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000763992,0.00001619535,0.00062359736,0.00062991877,0.0000098621085,0.000093302035,0.0008231795,0.0002561822,0.00009599991,0.6234657,0.37395886,0.000019639669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06327166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049138036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06327166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020640716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019178765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14975959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952609420","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i4.5023","title":"The Shafts of Strife and War: A Critical Analysis of the Immigration (Mass Arrivals) Amendment Bill","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Immigration; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Immigration law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.016215360915711394,"score_gpt":0.28257503428005754,"score_spread":0.26635967336434613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952609420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12275065,0.015377897,0.007909125,0.29287517,0.0034490232,0.0006387804,0.0001286058,0.00004823297,0.5568226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8837905,0.0054386393,0.0024814813,0.055324126,0.0012511482,0.0005087482,0.00003757219,0.00007157336,0.051096182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890237,0.005159028,0.00042247842,0.0007261078,0.0026171773,0.0020515518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98252,0.01428905,0.0008689792,0.00028269825,0.0016642328,0.00037511415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01813527,0.00046032676,0.0007280941,0.0028414705,0.017755898,0.013444696,0.0022229406,0.014598579,0.0029318486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030661598,0.0007512093,0.0008630899,0.0015150164,0.04175446,0.0076453607,0.004259897,0.01761748,0.0003031855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011160745,0.00001576838,0.0002552432,0.000059398342,0.0000033077988,0.00038108768,0.028939126,0.00011039448,0.00009987006,0.9588653,0.008579525,0.00267983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042004987,0.0001043787,0.0058983928,0.0020135252,0.00005205164,0.0003549263,0.14697567,0.0010129518,0.0009579347,0.20146513,0.6409714,0.00015164391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12515739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16137633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12515739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03274034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02468137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2488578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975264628","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i3.5612","title":"Book Review: The Constitution of Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Commonwealth; Independence (probability theory); Constitutional theory; Nothing; Constitutional law; Law; Historiography; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013585651942245428,"score_gpt":0.2650917697447398,"score_spread":0.2515061178024944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975264628","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019194793,0.84202284,0.0002805752,0.020411825,0.0071751494,0.000018151015,0.00019043709,0.000037515918,0.12967157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065748137,0.823377,0.00046289669,0.012196094,0.007890688,0.00005113121,0.00052629696,0.000077615776,0.14884344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987785,0.00021389766,0.000055918776,0.00013940055,0.0007212681,0.00009093807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811447,0.0007120284,0.00013705551,0.00008055956,0.0008362043,0.00011962896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007016339,0.0006208056,0.0009483366,0.0030977144,0.0012722416,0.0034374895,0.0008142634,0.001603728,0.029725596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039850776,0.0003558092,0.00036472167,0.005787441,0.0017964271,0.0029226146,0.0008907659,0.0030090215,0.012619368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052174455,0.000006688142,0.000051775267,0.00054767577,0.0000060292987,0.000021461101,0.000083749685,0.00007488768,0.00003299383,0.02073745,0.9299725,0.048459627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017028779,0.0000023645684,0.00017877812,0.00045991346,0.0000030970377,0.000035477708,0.0000354727,0.000007301562,0.00000826589,0.0015943699,0.99767095,0.0000023661494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023104606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036299564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029725596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046159476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008127718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099442005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975404603","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v35i1.5632","title":"\"Vexatious and an Abuse of the Process of the Court\": The Assets Company v Mere Roihi Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Certainty; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020904804518232796,"score_gpt":0.2892961959220668,"score_spread":0.268391391403834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975404603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16364345,0.008080686,0.0045737326,0.25982428,0.00090362085,0.00007993823,0.000060012797,0.000038974504,0.56279534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921943,0.0013950645,0.00069975597,0.042538453,0.00048489816,0.000066646455,0.000012112533,0.000018004885,0.032842115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99295795,0.0035967212,0.00021575388,0.0006302451,0.0012768855,0.0013225051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932689,0.005027831,0.0005937675,0.0002904206,0.0004979205,0.0003211271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007872084,0.00019026377,0.0003510838,0.00088385143,0.0129898805,0.008705329,0.0011871272,0.012365713,0.0015917487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015750121,0.00046519822,0.0003950892,0.0007856307,0.023973139,0.0048590796,0.0040224306,0.0136388615,0.00024329293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011377555,0.0000071951063,0.00045006338,0.000016337915,0.0000037391924,0.00069663185,0.012754915,0.000052276395,0.00015757376,0.97014815,0.012849977,0.0028518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008785853,0.00009528871,0.008820939,0.0010040695,0.000079152764,0.002369796,0.032555718,0.0013645925,0.0023238158,0.33162177,0.6195071,0.00016987388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06153313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10961795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06153313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00784833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068345405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12234992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976173574","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v37i4.5583","title":"Recognising Multi-textualism: Rethinking New Zealand's Legal History","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty of Waitangi; Treaty; Project commissioning; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Publishing; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043234437444675825,"score_gpt":0.27235618299210623,"score_spread":0.22912174554743042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976173574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10995348,0.1324126,0.0077454527,0.24719816,0.0034156342,0.00013496334,0.0001729338,0.000060276678,0.49890655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919339,0.038699962,0.0029767654,0.011699362,0.001214307,0.00013157961,0.00007895112,0.000116699324,0.025743509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98374593,0.0062698843,0.0010641941,0.0013293658,0.006390596,0.0012000487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582261,0.02833667,0.0035560892,0.0020489239,0.006598335,0.0012339363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026539499,0.00035155288,0.0007841394,0.009968839,0.011870049,0.018403022,0.0028206327,0.00437407,0.0032288928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045594387,0.0006610797,0.0003913937,0.0073333723,0.04276696,0.022679335,0.00855084,0.006981304,0.00021741814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002055102,0.000011956591,0.0013993172,0.0005824697,0.000024175562,0.00060930045,0.15201144,0.00014896582,0.00028998876,0.7900087,0.010519083,0.04437409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022198405,0.00004375682,0.014184939,0.0040912605,0.00006230614,0.0005183489,0.08272803,0.00044449998,0.0003713866,0.11451592,0.7829415,0.000075748045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44840366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60807276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44840366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035216134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03563782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8915873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976279444","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5529","title":"Using Human Rights Treaties to Resolve Ambiguity: the Advent of A Rights-Conscious Charming Betsy Canon","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Dualism; International human rights law; Political science; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Immigration; Common law; Fundamental rights; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03278274552012431,"score_gpt":0.3137602957655722,"score_spread":0.2809775502454479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976279444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045698658,0.009868867,0.030326014,0.21111903,0.0017362373,0.000060142458,0.000014826188,0.00006425828,0.70111185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148724,0.003267805,0.0075959913,0.025636422,0.00096833357,0.000093453265,0.0000083715895,0.000087796245,0.0474694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97901297,0.014177405,0.00036077402,0.0012626275,0.0037278896,0.0014584153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824241,0.014117887,0.0008440331,0.0010990371,0.000999401,0.00051549467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024884677,0.00034288247,0.0005593741,0.0018129884,0.011968939,0.013782306,0.0017032421,0.008953334,0.0027786898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026408982,0.0005215975,0.00052496674,0.001438595,0.056873363,0.012591243,0.009109004,0.014739538,0.00033501684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022279562,0.0000036610875,0.00004224374,0.000011279826,0.0000014714789,0.000057425077,0.0070476807,0.000100378114,0.000042001346,0.9870625,0.0019354867,0.0036936398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020786312,0.000018955812,0.00023811871,0.00024359112,0.000009505492,0.00009636512,0.005656115,0.00073747063,0.000320304,0.7220445,0.27058005,0.000034152272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022265537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041711092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024884677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010855711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011872488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13160431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976893161","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5518","title":"Deliberation and Legitimacy in Transnational Governance: The Case of Environmental Impact Assessments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Legitimacy; Environmental governance; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Transnational governance; Criticism; Corporate governance; Harm; Democratic legitimacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Economics; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.009568564324980777,"score_gpt":0.2713858767380855,"score_spread":0.26181731241310474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976893161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17679445,0.0016958005,0.08627501,0.062419694,0.00023450746,0.00024554817,0.000042817133,0.000090672234,0.6722015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856588,0.00026839573,0.004967479,0.0011448887,0.00005385595,0.00016364697,0.000011136572,0.000028761739,0.007703052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9563714,0.028452108,0.0018312216,0.0033010796,0.0057586487,0.0042854906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9389631,0.049441382,0.0030468027,0.004352163,0.0030321502,0.0011643883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039614696,0.00045543007,0.0010103774,0.002239671,0.017581215,0.017081162,0.002330619,0.013672008,0.004098193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057741072,0.00078925805,0.0012223509,0.0027259586,0.048603095,0.014014337,0.020873493,0.011091391,0.00046867348],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007113221,0.000008829781,0.00037573016,0.000014520287,0.0000061205988,0.00039915732,0.0059466017,0.0006605492,0.00006392834,0.9900698,0.0003932644,0.0020543567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004763266,0.000019492554,0.00057935284,0.00013694604,0.000019362842,0.0003073292,0.005378076,0.0031030534,0.0003442554,0.95707947,0.03295232,0.000032645534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016846003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01683735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039614696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010127256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011378663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20950502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977226620","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i4.5628","title":"The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: The Canadian Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Convention; Project commissioning; Law; Preference; Publishing; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03721263206562045,"score_gpt":0.2965334689502709,"score_spread":0.25932083688465046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977226620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014645429,0.08046572,0.0011592071,0.111914635,0.0016180719,0.00007572307,0.0007671843,0.000041476196,0.7893126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43594527,0.124675296,0.004132847,0.036887597,0.0005806453,0.00011963235,0.0007064185,0.00015856892,0.39679366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915308,0.0009179184,0.00023461125,0.0005238493,0.004867711,0.0019251951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947745,0.0012114262,0.00021715107,0.0001577578,0.0027929856,0.0008462148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005606417,0.00052760466,0.0006279435,0.0032090687,0.016073702,0.012510324,0.0017888747,0.004583198,0.008107558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009153473,0.00051226915,0.000382847,0.010992934,0.007393318,0.002499772,0.00190787,0.0049859798,0.00071339513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002668929,0.00003180653,0.001311249,0.00017274146,0.000012066861,0.00027363564,0.0062395525,0.00047855594,0.0002061654,0.7410491,0.20900181,0.041196547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056407557,0.000006472625,0.0023721976,0.00014702222,0.0000081624,0.000059292153,0.0021173109,0.0001262979,0.00008882736,0.0062671183,0.98877454,0.000027157994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99318343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99612623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14344424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14344424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23321547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99348325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004382415","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i1.5968","title":"Access to Legal Education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033139406781002884,"score_gpt":0.3528028254099387,"score_spread":0.31966341862893577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004382415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01975173,0.008104568,0.0012863831,0.10013616,0.0008749403,0.000046004323,0.00015998149,0.00004809896,0.8695921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57691336,0.0071581015,0.001033,0.022867922,0.0016834394,0.00009160573,0.00017411655,0.00004029563,0.3900382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954177,0.0013574167,0.00010269489,0.00041459498,0.0012018937,0.0015056876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905098,0.0025518772,0.00053153915,0.0006136999,0.0013091408,0.00448384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025915834,0.0001383501,0.00024718032,0.0013331604,0.002877664,0.0051937243,0.00077778875,0.0041510565,0.11504469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014950581,0.00017460175,0.0003125282,0.0010009382,0.0032957979,0.0059929937,0.008191562,0.0029302628,0.0048428425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000328087,0.0001974676,0.0030253355,0.00018574884,0.0000085344855,0.0002639749,0.003862884,0.00015009669,0.0002492114,0.7487118,0.08976413,0.15354793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023720544,0.00006513853,0.006797204,0.0005685123,0.000006006462,0.00019669064,0.0022232193,0.0001876905,0.00015219061,0.07709003,0.9126768,0.000012711534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018832527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04084797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11504469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057845204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012286711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38486278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004713773","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v32i3.5870","title":"In Absentia Trials and the Right to Defend: The Incorporation of a European Human Rights Principle into the Dutch Criminial Justice System","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to a fair trial; Law; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Convention; Political science; Project commissioning; Administration of justice; Criminal justice; Publishing","score_opus":0.0451853290645602,"score_gpt":0.3142188533675821,"score_spread":0.2690335243030219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004713773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101126954,0.06580206,0.02385042,0.118929505,0.0014105928,0.00017526212,0.00022699276,0.00002947024,0.68844867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94040275,0.008790504,0.0027174884,0.013259298,0.00037906683,0.00014913885,0.0000898198,0.000035711975,0.0341763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9570468,0.02664361,0.0029424075,0.0035651736,0.007262921,0.0025391954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686756,0.022760173,0.0031414672,0.0018898715,0.0028625939,0.0006701908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034595802,0.00017974962,0.0007289109,0.0017400947,0.004580197,0.0130264545,0.0017659324,0.005696979,0.003118625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069313966,0.00036858313,0.00045649536,0.002426703,0.017181283,0.009546869,0.0056717764,0.005018968,0.000314091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028344353,0.000009704293,0.0005682909,0.00013091692,0.000012279561,0.00026306315,0.0034019405,0.00019969148,0.00014224986,0.9781578,0.003379151,0.013706571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009985222,0.00009047873,0.007211094,0.0013781848,0.00006481572,0.00054573826,0.005522108,0.0005942419,0.00088014593,0.4970955,0.48644143,0.00007646041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037639733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064246945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037639733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010039556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011421026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1829623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005497808","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5939","title":"\"We are all Here to Stay\"; Addressing Aboriginal Title Claims after Delgamuukw v British Columbia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Media studies; Library science; Management; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.017449960063808702,"score_gpt":0.27018260702404273,"score_spread":0.252732646960234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005497808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2311289,0.055853937,0.0014480056,0.14532405,0.0017273581,0.00031380757,0.0005539422,0.00008350556,0.56356645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78415495,0.012906267,0.0008606964,0.055309568,0.00032128152,0.00011913974,0.00014656928,0.000049382033,0.14613226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437547,0.00093280314,0.00014273642,0.00039855813,0.0021145302,0.0020359755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954738,0.0021478937,0.00018010713,0.000118288604,0.0016569548,0.00042281713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030698557,0.0003304774,0.00037882873,0.002106524,0.028682431,0.009175343,0.0026877923,0.010312923,0.003324399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011822403,0.00046237386,0.00033621848,0.0026478171,0.0073129823,0.0020005943,0.0027757133,0.005983988,0.00025235993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011554977,0.00008177008,0.017959302,0.0008509249,0.00008897806,0.008997953,0.089966655,0.0011512251,0.0027159406,0.61430216,0.21031125,0.05345819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008642759,0.00010253542,0.060174342,0.0017095383,0.00025828977,0.00084652903,0.08599886,0.0011352078,0.00234775,0.03685084,0.81016964,0.000320124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99555427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06503066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06503066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47183263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044136967","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i1.5855","title":"Recent Developments in the Law of Equitable Remedies: What Canada Can Do For You","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Supreme court; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04301465892440598,"score_gpt":0.26593507759359203,"score_spread":0.22292041866918605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044136967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004815043,0.1788471,0.002807769,0.63646376,0.0026143917,0.000022484115,0.000174059,0.00006278715,0.17419256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32078198,0.29285845,0.007015234,0.26954076,0.005176193,0.00004898706,0.00019327222,0.000110870154,0.10427425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907836,0.00090582686,0.0002467124,0.00068327226,0.005529639,0.0018510208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873974,0.003782731,0.0005706298,0.0004616896,0.006364154,0.001423345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055744275,0.00047368702,0.00070494495,0.0023421762,0.010704942,0.012181406,0.0021489596,0.0094886795,0.0060865274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018016208,0.000379198,0.00047801694,0.0039681382,0.02074557,0.0059875343,0.0022313676,0.010911617,0.0005215776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011737317,0.000013769744,0.0004792869,0.0001808764,0.000009623378,0.00009828951,0.000744177,0.0004104217,0.00010942559,0.87816006,0.080461614,0.039320637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001376409,0.000013828995,0.002508855,0.00073776103,0.000028796167,0.00010668567,0.0010363882,0.00044893887,0.0001916608,0.13155816,0.8632819,0.0000731879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9453819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96462905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06335381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06335381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.117663614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4596662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123738432","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i4.5334","title":"International Law and the Practice of Legality: Stability and Change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; International law; Political science; Sources of international law; Municipal law; Statute; Public law; Public international law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03258657486503207,"score_gpt":0.29308632400806517,"score_spread":0.2604997491430331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123738432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021872759,0.14586781,0.031787384,0.162313,0.0008467764,0.000080093116,0.000055856497,0.00006418739,0.6371122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103255,0.04590721,0.005900383,0.014219515,0.0012719977,0.0001603858,0.00005529728,0.000072872994,0.022086779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97871304,0.012845831,0.00082663563,0.0015150025,0.0043513947,0.0017480878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855649,0.009019253,0.001701993,0.0012545104,0.001739703,0.00071978045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138462465,0.00035575542,0.0006897111,0.003965642,0.005321617,0.015104169,0.0016681063,0.005410412,0.0033880472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018647125,0.00037694068,0.00055375026,0.0048814197,0.06705692,0.0149431685,0.0056218193,0.008149682,0.00044893654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010342351,0.0000033569481,0.00012908339,0.000041137773,0.0000018915617,0.000014833785,0.0014796507,0.00007883316,0.000015848656,0.9934418,0.001067894,0.0037246088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008038383,0.000020925398,0.001432255,0.0008126141,0.000009176796,0.00010540827,0.003989383,0.00038915226,0.00008862809,0.8180751,0.17505074,0.000018389483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027999727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022745887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027999727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013796441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016681558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10010064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124426488","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i1.5588","title":"The Needs of the Many and the Needs of the Few: A New System of Public Interest Intervention for New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Adversarial system; Intervention (counseling); Public interest; Order (exchange); Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fair dealing; Balance (ability); Public relations; Business; Sociology; Legislature; Psychology","score_opus":0.02554518457729594,"score_gpt":0.2556189662009864,"score_spread":0.23007378162369047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124426488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2551749,0.0060281204,0.041630264,0.22329152,0.0010993618,0.002331141,0.00015276605,0.00036325018,0.4699286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307655,0.002338536,0.050652385,0.015036905,0.00028604703,0.0008602054,0.000047900045,0.00012569102,0.09988687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937511,0.0015601212,0.0004998965,0.0009581495,0.0021012365,0.0011295181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507916,0.0012748743,0.00045547154,0.0006886775,0.0009619325,0.0015398699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077534863,0.00027141353,0.00048880646,0.00094470684,0.007475212,0.0107933665,0.0018615191,0.0047548455,0.006182416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011014761,0.00083763537,0.00065525935,0.00051767397,0.012654119,0.006919824,0.007072426,0.006133175,0.00046670213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001821829,0.0003803788,0.010449287,0.00095664803,0.000071099465,0.0034282806,0.047969725,0.0017762685,0.0138217965,0.73845094,0.030216707,0.15229674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039769718,0.0005902566,0.04288396,0.0010559451,0.00019076598,0.002597984,0.021764044,0.0043452336,0.0023579753,0.18245979,0.74087507,0.00048129787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25163287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46446574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25163287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018312529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062072158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5003364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158256369","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5521","title":"The Democratic Challenge of Incorporation: International Human Rights Treaties and National Constitutions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Treaty; Political science; Democracy; Law; State (computer science); International community; International human rights law; Supreme court; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.021827669595668803,"score_gpt":0.2848495493933192,"score_spread":0.2630218797976504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158256369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073731197,0.004918834,0.0036770867,0.062428493,0.00054303335,0.000023454775,0.000028849096,0.000021961137,0.92098516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8235692,0.0056350627,0.0041247746,0.03340142,0.0014564598,0.000249484,0.00008265015,0.0000768175,0.13140428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810477,0.008056043,0.0005374059,0.001587835,0.004789148,0.00398195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948403,0.002849489,0.00043436504,0.0007587919,0.00066131644,0.0004557115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014756652,0.00045335808,0.00072070444,0.0016069647,0.01220811,0.018920425,0.0016503495,0.008237567,0.005255004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017751299,0.00051941106,0.00075841375,0.0016356433,0.03589226,0.01047383,0.009612615,0.014229567,0.000735467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011991981,0.000002743469,0.000019246952,0.0000027670858,6.7252176e-7,0.000009977953,0.00055559835,0.000038185222,0.0000071629697,0.99732035,0.0011368945,0.000905157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017577022,0.000008655645,0.00036703722,0.00015737522,0.000009490007,0.000042600965,0.001652367,0.0002794001,0.00011498653,0.7743973,0.22293602,0.000017234799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07845221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108907044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07845221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01983793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024739254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15599114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210337685","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v52i4.7400","title":"Dissonance between Fact and Law: The Example of Visual Artistic Practice and Income Tax Concessions for Peak Copyright","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Common law copyright; Statute; Legislation; Income tax; Law; Tax law; Fair use; Economics; Common law; Law and economics; Double taxation; Public economics; Political science; Intellectual property; Copyright law","score_opus":0.02690961963721568,"score_gpt":0.25162978113126644,"score_spread":0.22472016149405077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210337685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078103684,0.0027267882,0.014042776,0.056358926,0.00045600132,0.00005276991,0.00005811109,0.000042889522,0.8481581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95375586,0.0011742404,0.0040246835,0.0041589127,0.00022208625,0.00006521738,0.000027312113,0.00005915473,0.036512535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956383,0.0023025605,0.00009887137,0.000507997,0.0008077966,0.0006445204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929838,0.0048053446,0.0005124779,0.00063766504,0.00068769936,0.00037295508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005535527,0.00042535228,0.00047140237,0.0015883823,0.017952904,0.011070025,0.002085467,0.008387934,0.008162921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012901877,0.0003998663,0.0010492267,0.001396917,0.04699422,0.017895702,0.009075779,0.010468948,0.00083354954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008998309,0.0000131635,0.00016908515,0.000008666002,0.0000018676722,0.00020285866,0.007878962,0.000097596436,0.000039397753,0.98781556,0.0021263117,0.0016375165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057113433,0.000023973927,0.0012988636,0.00024748687,0.000016612526,0.00042270918,0.015826002,0.0015854626,0.00028202066,0.8319441,0.1482591,0.000036624057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028080368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03442733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028080368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009661416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057744235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07009882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372080422","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i3-4.5810","title":"Protecting Rights in Common Law Constitutional Systems; a Framework for a Comparative Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Common law; Constitution; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Legislature; Human rights; Constitutional review; Fundamental rights; Comparative law; Politics; Democracy; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.0721219157603624,"score_gpt":0.314255935206012,"score_spread":0.2421340194456496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372080422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032246023,0.043832816,0.09942475,0.040661003,0.0006023423,0.00021076843,0.00012965057,0.00006420709,0.7828284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444594,0.013329449,0.024917811,0.002902188,0.00055719697,0.00064699404,0.0001112344,0.00008735461,0.012988458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97101045,0.023900239,0.00042253645,0.0010430486,0.0020404127,0.0015833796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98187125,0.014380225,0.00086354034,0.0015736012,0.0008123095,0.0004990796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022459824,0.0007836307,0.0011824556,0.008171767,0.010304871,0.017726589,0.0029049292,0.0074222507,0.0065068156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02012844,0.0005419767,0.0009995322,0.007433138,0.081753306,0.035246663,0.007777997,0.007894614,0.0004417104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.523893e-7,0.0000028597447,0.000017897371,0.000008347151,9.718746e-7,0.000009936433,0.0008940207,0.000052652733,0.0000062253707,0.9982849,0.00011376602,0.00060774334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009523119,0.000019431163,0.00022654992,0.00024792153,0.0000058372707,0.00005915563,0.0061095837,0.00046966595,0.00005727636,0.9448566,0.047927573,0.000010867387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01058663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008277475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022459824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019303996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069081616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1400609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387652472","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v54i1.8446","title":"The Criminal Law, the Intelligence and Security Act and the Protective Security Requirements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Criminal law; Statute; Political science; Criminal code; Common law; Legislature; Legislative history; Politics","score_opus":0.04387486937391837,"score_gpt":0.2984201245111002,"score_spread":0.25454525513718185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387652472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02169112,0.049536392,0.008074502,0.07168703,0.0029666894,0.00027720458,0.00042835742,0.00010023029,0.84523857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.590123,0.07531862,0.023561582,0.029466327,0.0019046522,0.00081273675,0.0007339609,0.00019576105,0.27788335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355364,0.0009301329,0.00056446734,0.000627252,0.00370045,0.0006241146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593085,0.0016284253,0.00083461683,0.00037399883,0.0008528067,0.00037933202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026777887,0.0007205328,0.0004486884,0.002889345,0.005690918,0.009473719,0.0014655775,0.0059805145,0.0042956113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012386665,0.00047882003,0.00039425807,0.0038178696,0.028899498,0.0059883343,0.0033573105,0.007852827,0.00096321275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015944173,0.000016488713,0.00085167715,0.00020754298,0.000004616792,0.00061527774,0.0085539585,0.00020390331,0.00040373433,0.9162019,0.025695907,0.047229134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009478903,0.000029998293,0.0058936365,0.0012055964,0.000010114325,0.00049826794,0.0040095155,0.00020731399,0.00025245236,0.10967342,0.87814605,0.000064156025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44922614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47514862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44922614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024544884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029532634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410144503","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v55i2.9803","title":"Navigating Towards an Airworthy Protection Regime for New Zealand's Airline Passengers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Advertising; Political science; Publishing; Aeronautics; Business; Media studies; Engineering; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.020109284044250098,"score_gpt":0.30061366792152455,"score_spread":0.28050438387727444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410144503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43413314,0.0043072794,0.015284615,0.16506924,0.0008389901,0.0005477248,0.00015940826,0.0001806893,0.3794789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8707838,0.003380646,0.014487236,0.024634598,0.0004186104,0.0001981937,0.00009034102,0.000048701222,0.08595782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959305,0.00047229737,0.0002816526,0.0005972716,0.0018123286,0.000906036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964593,0.0005484949,0.00076448504,0.00034662223,0.0013303605,0.0005505939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004630929,0.00028841663,0.00026461325,0.0007815414,0.0047043655,0.009354574,0.0017328185,0.0069173304,0.004780301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008010149,0.00044196667,0.0007439357,0.00040528298,0.0080224415,0.005581328,0.0031456158,0.0057450826,0.000599701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009258229,0.00027102983,0.017488958,0.00035971391,0.000040846862,0.0033174288,0.032232173,0.0019401864,0.017789299,0.83643144,0.030679818,0.059356496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017906667,0.00045773,0.04869034,0.0012596516,0.00007241229,0.0013992981,0.014562968,0.0032455707,0.0027286795,0.06703958,0.8601142,0.00025054018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53172314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5233144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53172314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012891533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0326054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9420693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W822600774","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v44i3/4.4982","title":"Māui And The People Of The North","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.006742660316217058,"score_gpt":0.20047318462312808,"score_spread":0.193730524306911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W822600774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09196696,0.31411743,0.00038902534,0.19005966,0.0023145303,0.00004277208,0.00010400056,0.000034635475,0.40097097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7962528,0.07869498,0.00036128916,0.026308585,0.00072804594,0.00018073876,0.000068745234,0.000030957162,0.09737397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980045,0.0009992324,0.000046407527,0.00013052927,0.00028635588,0.00053293206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985368,0.0007748606,0.00016625707,0.000079338715,0.00022657543,0.00021619524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020607314,0.0002437487,0.00041283236,0.0014071802,0.011391377,0.004668325,0.00083352096,0.0014718426,0.005292282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039382754,0.00022692152,0.00017211538,0.001848499,0.0078684725,0.0045140507,0.0043384563,0.002452644,0.00048759166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006173746,0.00003607549,0.0066129924,0.0014732156,0.000047451507,0.0018176903,0.36002538,0.00006414044,0.00063424907,0.42448303,0.113830455,0.09091363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005140671,0.000018979199,0.008188965,0.0009477784,0.000017135031,0.00035725397,0.10253217,0.000015050625,0.00010409463,0.008529574,0.8792683,0.000015556636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23909648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46910998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23909648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010623423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013685287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4754095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}