{"meta":{"query_hash":"50015c071779","filters":{"venue":"WORD Structure"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/50015c071779","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=WORD+Structure"},"results":[{"id":"W2094646142","doi":"10.3366/e1750124510000504","title":"Pavol Štekauer, <i>Meaning predictability in word formation</i>. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2005. xxii + 263pp. ISBN 90-272-1563-4.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WORD Structure","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Predictability; Word (group theory); Meaning (existential); Word formation; Philosophy; Humanities; Mathematics; Epistemology; Statistics","score_opus":0.007726530795244653,"score_gpt":0.2477340681247633,"score_spread":0.24000753732951866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094646142","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003455708,0.97285426,0.0046634222,0.0074460753,0.0037790837,0.000014813251,0.00038880718,0.00024054866,0.010267423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009938331,0.9536064,0.0032688826,0.0013972439,0.0038729322,0.00006231689,0.0005971874,0.00027468114,0.026982017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993249,0.00018206425,0.00009586849,0.000145566,0.000197868,0.000053694843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988175,0.0007811101,0.0000910461,0.00006280554,0.00017536496,0.00007212636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012771203,0.003316296,0.0014675921,0.0048929034,0.0010605322,0.0029336768,0.002827848,0.0034832805,0.037723348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026426255,0.0020227423,0.00073867943,0.005388226,0.0023635917,0.009281499,0.0016920561,0.0029123821,0.029586418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014188811,0.00006852224,0.00046827074,0.0027953966,0.000095056166,0.00019743449,0.0009825459,0.0005776849,0.00074492104,0.025537249,0.7443335,0.22405756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038694307,0.0000430085,0.0040189233,0.0018786603,0.00005713889,0.0010204758,0.000757414,0.0006472582,0.001305888,0.07787145,0.9122884,0.000072505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009533885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013852219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037723348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015360365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012083742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1261971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094700626","doi":"10.3366/word.2010.0006","title":"Meaning predictability and compound interpretation: A psycholinguistic investigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WORD Structure","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Meaning (existential); Nonsense; Interpretation (philosophy); Task (project management); Comprehension; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Psycholinguistics; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science; Cognition; Mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.014091697857914798,"score_gpt":0.2745220134938467,"score_spread":0.2604303156359319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094700626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99466455,0.00015044028,0.00322964,0.00009711838,0.000004600663,0.000015325453,0.000017004533,0.000008539081,0.0018127578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980261,0.000102659054,0.0017034428,0.000024773743,0.000006547302,0.000007520405,0.000014554846,0.000009184267,0.000105176565],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992224,0.0002820561,0.000057403602,0.00016916067,0.00022569159,0.000043183853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98931587,0.008091236,0.0016450852,0.0005403744,0.00023820427,0.00016916908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013755084,0.00026564155,0.0003857568,0.00042975956,0.0003497632,0.0016447894,0.00026364546,0.0004406218,0.0018279717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011503405,0.00028832673,0.0002445392,0.0003347257,0.0015191799,0.0025332165,0.00078780187,0.0007812544,0.000114914845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022900095,0.0007324212,0.16876443,0.00079957664,0.00018379389,0.0031106134,0.03655516,0.0022480844,0.6920562,0.021596862,0.0002467942,0.07141605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015479236,0.002183196,0.8109022,0.00007527247,0.00020246187,0.0054696365,0.010595439,0.014688834,0.081635125,0.070752524,0.00316933,0.00017121213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003871931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006384608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018279717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028648158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038302515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0072745085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111042112","doi":"10.3366/word.2011.0009","title":"Principles of affix ordering: An overview","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WORD Structure","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affix; Linguistics; Focus (optics); Word formation; Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Word order; Root (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09742024920509669,"score_gpt":0.2658985894333245,"score_spread":0.16847834022822783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111042112","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013044653,0.22986744,0.49080405,0.006152657,0.0013066069,0.00024936636,0.0005314055,0.0010756103,0.25696814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24438955,0.30759868,0.39064473,0.0028477563,0.005155578,0.0006015514,0.0013526944,0.001111115,0.046298407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977133,0.0005501943,0.00034076112,0.0005136431,0.0007188585,0.00016324579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828774,0.0010006548,0.000154978,0.0002480316,0.00024719708,0.00006143952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030116201,0.0010224335,0.0010577933,0.005951227,0.0020404914,0.0055177216,0.0021054468,0.001971905,0.0066823787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035096183,0.0011361694,0.0011324406,0.0052108406,0.010020636,0.009713139,0.0025367578,0.0031877505,0.0032343457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020579733,0.0000162388,0.0005284794,0.0004251206,0.000018921803,0.000115864,0.0006100983,0.0009813072,0.00064868515,0.8951084,0.0027372907,0.09878888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069068074,0.000023572502,0.0008594194,0.00022839487,0.000012722646,0.0006042905,0.00015879842,0.0013558373,0.0006090158,0.829928,0.16617623,0.000036961246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029290498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021753367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066823787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022324454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021836294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022354722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}