{"meta":{"query_hash":"295299c1c255","filters":{"venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/295299c1c255","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Waikato+Law+Review%3A+Taumauri"},"results":[{"id":"W2198389808","doi":"","title":"Corporate Criminal Liability: A Paradox of Hope","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate liability; Mens rea; Strict liability; Legislature; Law; Criminal law; Commonwealth; Liability; Doctrine; Political science; Common law; Corporation; Limited liability partnership; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.039417374175698544,"score_gpt":0.2609308072651153,"score_spread":0.22151343308941676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198389808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86366546,0.017596362,0.00030368884,0.005345249,0.00016306982,0.0008137217,0.000026869857,0.00012969844,0.11195589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98504287,0.0025047327,0.0011654402,0.008886543,0.000043462544,0.000047667265,0.000039715505,0.00001758809,0.0022520088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983977,0.00015866062,0.0005705007,0.00034985205,0.0002762663,0.00024704117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989607,0.0000551832,0.00036942982,0.0005115671,0.000030545525,0.000072590665],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041945535,0.00018020661,0.0004105037,0.000021152387,0.00010612522,0.000011600426,0.00029388693,0.000076811164,0.0041825785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005827219,0.0001510424,0.00016005216,0.00028266525,0.0006257725,0.00018081156,0.000112022884,0.00012201843,0.00090998295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008505708,0.0011224527,0.3049717,0.0022974166,0.00008667838,0.0000746856,0.00015591575,0.00033273653,0.003456445,0.22345044,0.44440997,0.019556504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003489271,0.00009246771,0.063317984,0.00038776375,0.00033091631,0.000029934152,0.000021924687,0.00013215173,0.0020881768,0.007999487,0.9248656,0.00038464373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015752051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049870944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48045564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045904555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001871587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203824065","doi":"","title":"Indigenous peoples: Negotiating constitutional reconciliation and legitimacy in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Negotiation; Duty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04505518199907934,"score_gpt":0.283898263497561,"score_spread":0.23884308149848163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203824065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5396748,0.24375828,0.000045731897,0.003387681,0.0012381652,0.0036751325,0.00009714744,0.00014603998,0.20797698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625173,0.035408884,0.00037742904,0.0013582513,0.00009992087,0.0000832925,0.000012016378,0.000006089595,0.00013682486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983864,0.00021806553,0.00039235762,0.0002538665,0.0003712077,0.00037810983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992909,0.00016838436,0.0001732191,0.00010112411,0.0001388951,0.00012747986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005523462,0.00014811967,0.0003286976,0.000016827415,0.00075246487,0.00003970769,0.00015731897,0.00005298313,0.00022125345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050651224,0.00012883062,0.000040328723,0.00020103883,0.0005070226,0.00034610843,0.000052205003,0.00015487417,0.000019521449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013053829,0.00009020323,0.1870768,0.0011096903,0.00008897377,0.0000589569,0.10702469,0.000014876523,0.000009623778,0.67772907,0.008551635,0.018232444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075755396,0.000037207392,0.064503,0.0021907762,0.000094751005,0.000012563001,0.024045039,0.00005604943,0.000019148427,0.0006985887,0.9066984,0.0008869117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89814675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009708979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013322509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57874274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214544630","doi":"","title":"The First Four Years: New Zealand's Personal Property Securities Act in Practice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law and economics; Law; Property (philosophy); Personal property; Business; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024868352542335326,"score_gpt":0.24493456101985786,"score_spread":0.22006620847752253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214544630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045046927,0.085489124,0.000057009667,0.14754322,0.0020647587,0.0023065966,0.000025882133,0.00036545892,0.7576433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79026425,0.046793457,0.0005701554,0.08939706,0.0154069,0.0002515661,0.00022447582,0.00017754674,0.05691462],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984615,0.000026079642,0.00045197035,0.0002824531,0.0004376282,0.00034036103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991966,0.00015231223,0.00025890884,0.00022591537,0.00014984376,0.000016405938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005783968,0.00020139315,0.00026462955,0.00004592046,0.00021605802,0.00047788132,0.000401256,0.000058831934,0.00020086623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034055853,0.000122021556,0.00012942957,0.00020049137,0.00016278274,0.0011512362,0.00011006923,0.0002172463,0.00042716938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003271987,0.000099108,0.0017739653,0.0004561384,0.000031274452,0.00004917879,0.000053741107,0.000008612617,0.0000013580147,0.37436125,0.61949277,0.0036398782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036873823,0.000008742237,0.0024607682,0.0008213534,0.00005934995,0.000013504064,0.000036270576,0.0002751584,0.0000016154798,0.003509432,0.9922356,0.00020948863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012876455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072832745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7857595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006481688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044508626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99369687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242657706","doi":"","title":"Improving New Zealand's prosecution system: A practical reform proposal to avoid miscarriages of justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Misconduct; Criminal justice; Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Power (physics); Miscarriage; Quality (philosophy); Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04270603438513282,"score_gpt":0.3644047792279266,"score_spread":0.32169874484279376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242657706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06920126,0.21503519,0.004222324,0.20365228,0.01018521,0.022906795,0.00013323338,0.0018447433,0.47281897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98103267,0.003783923,0.0073793307,0.0013423259,0.0020810135,0.00013484208,0.000011743119,0.00003951169,0.0041946536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972069,0.0003897799,0.0006201369,0.00032254058,0.0007696575,0.00069097383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982436,0.00014622539,0.0003482253,0.0004049019,0.00023964624,0.0006174286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029566125,0.00020996624,0.0005033656,0.00004000694,0.0004407495,0.00007627948,0.00032309658,0.00013528117,0.00009983656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010909847,0.0001637722,0.00015202607,0.00035099476,0.00017869548,0.0009413465,0.00011538808,0.00022349409,0.00026347776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008618027,0.0001517203,0.00014536986,0.009966023,0.000027594891,0.000010665569,0.006412183,5.661961e-7,0.0010210001,0.9240287,0.050829343,0.0073206844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018364645,0.00015014033,0.00007902472,0.005034631,0.00059486856,0.00004632551,0.0035305708,0.000007781048,0.0009737814,0.00013034792,0.98893315,0.0003357635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02614965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003459483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004241025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048502986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257952031","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Duties of the Crown to Maori: Will the Canadian Remedy Travel?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Indigenous; Duty; Context (archaeology); Law; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.022688905652476495,"score_gpt":0.302796489152118,"score_spread":0.2801075834996415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257952031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002996698,0.03587711,0.000006826344,0.5463376,0.000349908,0.0022864952,0.000069472444,0.000035316196,0.4120406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561024,0.012224251,0.000086601,0.019618973,0.00055876427,0.00018370083,0.000002613406,0.000016838332,0.011205895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824804,0.00028116567,0.00037264318,0.00020146553,0.00046475523,0.00043194636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985456,0.00017229843,0.0001391772,0.00079999835,0.00014497069,0.00019794611],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016034801,0.00012752021,0.00019508971,0.000013819086,0.0031446628,0.00012901891,0.0013123691,0.00006377228,0.00026736374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023208073,0.00006021552,0.00017458912,0.00047943674,0.0006424357,0.00013487772,0.000102064594,0.0002203783,0.000114023496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011752134,0.000010831349,0.00005205039,0.000023489652,0.000011163254,2.0139967e-7,0.0021608442,0.0000063664397,0.000007940324,0.90939933,0.077500455,0.010826181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032912503,0.000005604393,0.00091317407,0.0001473248,0.000028584916,9.302568e-7,0.0004129879,0.000004818443,0.00008134549,0.0017171706,0.9965598,0.00009533875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28158867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93825513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019561299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005491157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767083539","doi":"","title":"Equality Under Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Multiculturalism; Common law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.06927528886844081,"score_gpt":0.37484842520672385,"score_spread":0.30557313633828304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767083539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033070603,0.1411091,0.000040604886,0.07561607,0.00044280072,0.0013293697,0.000022907812,0.00043077234,0.7777013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8812256,0.057787664,0.0014030926,0.04689077,0.0015106449,0.0001457111,0.000019010837,0.0000369209,0.010980622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970368,0.0005756635,0.00053873885,0.00042528476,0.0007628624,0.0006606402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998802,0.00016912958,0.00019117224,0.0003707304,0.00020867083,0.00025831308],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014954284,0.00026132845,0.0005570993,0.00001068198,0.0015342841,0.00011703672,0.00048036716,0.00014392822,0.0014994703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018552541,0.00020068385,0.00028327474,0.00028209185,0.000911796,0.0005430121,0.00014668342,0.00025864778,0.001674277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021987514,0.000060857645,0.000047467307,0.00016930817,0.00003965069,0.0000013692594,0.0021536348,0.0000037031023,0.000013630688,0.9617234,0.03014254,0.0056422297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016802971,0.000011433053,0.00014986422,0.0003404941,0.000059120583,7.862699e-7,0.0005145054,0.0000029703735,0.000057647667,0.0018301248,0.996557,0.00030804533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024809709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05728634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96641445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041825493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051798037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}