{"meta":{"query_hash":"295299c1c255","filters":{"venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/295299c1c255","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Waikato+Law+Review%3A+Taumauri"},"results":[{"id":"W2198389808","doi":"","title":"Corporate Criminal Liability: A Paradox of Hope","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate liability; Mens rea; Strict liability; Legislature; Law; Criminal law; Commonwealth; Liability; Doctrine; Political science; Common law; Corporation; Limited liability partnership; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.039417374175698544,"score_gpt":0.2609308072651153,"score_spread":0.22151343308941676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198389808","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031858318,0.014353344,0.0054702074,0.6485309,0.00076321827,0.000025974687,0.0000747158,0.00004377136,0.29887953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112102,0.0073447665,0.0015626401,0.059966765,0.0024201246,0.00006433205,0.00004130072,0.000044838904,0.01734506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953674,0.0013263212,0.00014798318,0.00068595505,0.0017980379,0.0006743495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851232,0.009405373,0.0011030025,0.0011715513,0.0014661006,0.0017307752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012236271,0.00025260856,0.0006871167,0.0020383098,0.007887491,0.011385885,0.0016286154,0.008028975,0.0068960814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024354577,0.00042787121,0.0006032248,0.0015992358,0.04093419,0.014170968,0.0069044367,0.013925022,0.0008120968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006806201,0.000013051584,0.00016334992,0.000017077122,0.0000019528936,0.00005218697,0.0010428833,0.000058661622,0.000026393376,0.989674,0.005050916,0.0038927651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029224977,0.000017068658,0.00049692084,0.000096110925,0.0000049043992,0.00014346075,0.0018629831,0.00019174335,0.000057167203,0.9132551,0.08383187,0.000013387649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010711665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012454074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012236271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010296408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076886266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07470602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203824065","doi":"","title":"Indigenous peoples: Negotiating constitutional reconciliation and legitimacy in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Negotiation; Duty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04505518199907934,"score_gpt":0.283898263497561,"score_spread":0.23884308149848163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203824065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25801355,0.006068772,0.004775827,0.052013766,0.00023495362,0.00018810078,0.00012614959,0.00008160847,0.6784972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805588,0.0014273066,0.0012251426,0.0016824006,0.00002736635,0.000031585616,0.000024167652,0.000018008,0.015005115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877808,0.0022864193,0.00032496738,0.00084549445,0.004682108,0.004080193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98963064,0.004812394,0.0005612469,0.00043787184,0.003343386,0.0012145146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010014899,0.0002670784,0.00056929875,0.003017786,0.02848045,0.012707229,0.0031664483,0.004253583,0.0059099817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025703432,0.00041547295,0.00034858598,0.0035081315,0.021943353,0.0030945954,0.008308809,0.005436954,0.00022771065],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023683011,0.000023062958,0.0035693366,0.00007768057,0.000027055105,0.00084973045,0.04679474,0.0008674928,0.0003288166,0.91877824,0.007960121,0.02069996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014345592,0.000049729853,0.020117782,0.0007753202,0.00020760145,0.00045836734,0.10043365,0.0050774687,0.001497969,0.2797352,0.5912386,0.00026488185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98980147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13342611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13342611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27653962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96807873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214544630","doi":"","title":"The First Four Years: New Zealand's Personal Property Securities Act in Practice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law and economics; Law; Property (philosophy); Personal property; Business; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024868352542335326,"score_gpt":0.24493456101985786,"score_spread":0.22006620847752253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214544630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14136958,0.021548444,0.003165206,0.06418294,0.0023520049,0.00040112605,0.00046836582,0.000111795845,0.76640046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7070785,0.013140489,0.0024153776,0.01918832,0.0005319228,0.0003139277,0.0003100769,0.00005382242,0.2569675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942504,0.00080587243,0.0005021336,0.00042272298,0.0031994127,0.00081939175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959859,0.0012626633,0.0007208652,0.00048826326,0.0010020939,0.00054028054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051886174,0.00032631194,0.00040368334,0.0015372745,0.0047063725,0.007136472,0.0011593932,0.0045153922,0.0046392316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014218054,0.0005187174,0.00054500205,0.0023940303,0.007852243,0.004568167,0.0029037816,0.006003715,0.0007503265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005773029,0.00009271915,0.009856184,0.00044233876,0.000023600545,0.002640848,0.041678462,0.00049761636,0.0013423227,0.80623597,0.06061879,0.07651344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023447828,0.0001301076,0.042603653,0.0005032393,0.000023135986,0.00084903295,0.009623797,0.00044064815,0.00056024874,0.013936256,0.93123853,0.00006793167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52987796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6065395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52987796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020466963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027221447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94578135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242657706","doi":"","title":"Improving New Zealand's prosecution system: A practical reform proposal to avoid miscarriages of justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Misconduct; Criminal justice; Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Power (physics); Miscarriage; Quality (philosophy); Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04270603438513282,"score_gpt":0.3644047792279266,"score_spread":0.32169874484279376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242657706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05638483,0.0039979056,0.032192566,0.8291426,0.0039318306,0.006171767,0.00024900676,0.00080648577,0.067123115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49657297,0.0067259525,0.17933175,0.23702098,0.0050056586,0.0050456957,0.00047792512,0.00015887694,0.069660194],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697706,0.0096172,0.002657494,0.0026119992,0.010086142,0.005256527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95073104,0.011112621,0.0050465064,0.00418045,0.019202609,0.009726793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0329316,0.00089912594,0.00096330186,0.003992961,0.0060661784,0.00832284,0.0068415576,0.017920969,0.007354288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09348701,0.0010822393,0.0014626135,0.0014207852,0.008149103,0.007931801,0.008092111,0.0068013896,0.0014940213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046581347,0.0025042724,0.016710585,0.0033004372,0.00036675547,0.0053023715,0.014338747,0.014346751,0.00990518,0.32782492,0.24232198,0.3626122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003406476,0.0037921055,0.0706548,0.0030248633,0.00059281103,0.0033959667,0.009389697,0.015297724,0.0033735198,0.056588486,0.8296703,0.00081323273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23467058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25723323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23467058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018268151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11554447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4666093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257952031","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Duties of the Crown to Maori: Will the Canadian Remedy Travel?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Indigenous; Duty; Context (archaeology); Law; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.022688905652476495,"score_gpt":0.302796489152118,"score_spread":0.2801075834996415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257952031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11099306,0.031385023,0.0024918916,0.31013116,0.00069268415,0.00007249446,0.0002090017,0.000043593376,0.54398113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855844,0.012171298,0.0014974115,0.016226998,0.00021042344,0.000024384406,0.000035226778,0.00001854141,0.084231295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804294,0.00020993671,0.00003457693,0.00015554923,0.0007388997,0.00081803015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836165,0.00047230732,0.0001562462,0.00007042957,0.0006870959,0.00025224107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017308408,0.00017695459,0.0003106354,0.00093055895,0.011936687,0.006275853,0.0012776405,0.0047407383,0.004596725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062729423,0.00017992195,0.00023803778,0.0014699916,0.0114597725,0.0028753537,0.0015686817,0.0034955519,0.0002958107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016101805,0.000011168487,0.0019349902,0.000084680985,0.00000782704,0.00026617825,0.007141141,0.00019894692,0.00029746853,0.93572384,0.026562471,0.027755257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036542322,0.000057309157,0.025077356,0.000716766,0.000072604926,0.00049036025,0.039264314,0.0012537119,0.0007397249,0.1949454,0.7372179,0.00012798644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97195756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98830545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051909406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051909406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090047695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37663084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767083539","doi":"","title":"Equality Under Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Multiculturalism; Common law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.06927528886844081,"score_gpt":0.37484842520672385,"score_spread":0.30557313633828304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767083539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054280804,0.012047788,0.00360817,0.024978815,0.00067285786,0.00008578495,0.000084746076,0.00001601031,0.95307773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67538744,0.020611595,0.0046944097,0.037250496,0.0014656858,0.00037810337,0.000235459,0.00006986923,0.25990695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841061,0.0048903697,0.00075212016,0.0021348363,0.0056522796,0.0024642663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958198,0.0013963907,0.00052156026,0.00067604944,0.0011407251,0.00044540543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071810656,0.00033977488,0.00086243235,0.0012840244,0.006195614,0.0090573905,0.0011734824,0.004805536,0.0110683385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015554882,0.00031767713,0.00046771643,0.0010773769,0.025126357,0.008013631,0.0052808607,0.004643463,0.0015696132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031595887,0.0000061176434,0.00014467169,0.000044803655,0.0000037299844,0.000027364635,0.0019304254,0.00003160916,0.00006466441,0.97976923,0.007941956,0.010032265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009839677,0.000026002486,0.0016445608,0.00045937824,0.000011836564,0.00011727646,0.0024157153,0.000055622837,0.00012570259,0.36991864,0.6252003,0.000015238188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06721721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054857243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06721721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089469645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0194116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13365191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}