{"meta":{"query_hash":"b3d2174a9a89","filters":{"venue":"Washington and Lee law review"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b3d2174a9a89","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Washington+and+Lee+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1482438775","doi":"","title":"A Tribute to Andrew W. McThenia, Jr.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Surprise; Silence; Humility; Law; Conversation; Revelation; Art history; Classics; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Theology; Aesthetics; Political science","score_opus":0.05333455671530522,"score_gpt":0.39506169587541057,"score_spread":0.34172713916010533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482438775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011341446,0.021196716,0.0011688742,0.44888628,0.1387731,0.00010511133,0.0006454958,0.0007854271,0.3873049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004882913,0.0035936253,0.00046194287,0.0436526,0.005857406,0.000052327392,0.00018250525,0.00020182329,0.9411148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808073,0.00020538429,0.00007539506,0.0003662408,0.0008998124,0.00037233334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939803,0.00041106276,0.0002867402,0.00030759504,0.002829514,0.0021848655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014279038,0.00082586525,0.0006222851,0.0012083437,0.0067512537,0.0045204894,0.0011922335,0.0033623914,0.16830294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009934111,0.00047287944,0.00043353706,0.0007655184,0.0011947157,0.0026910282,0.0027527786,0.007388588,0.1264112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033419687,0.00000400555,0.000047965015,0.0000063527473,4.8275643e-7,0.00002477958,0.000027336888,0.0000044449207,0.00001764376,0.0006481975,0.99368685,0.0055286004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013069695,0.000003803986,0.00022657587,0.000036745885,7.3190415e-7,0.000111133566,0.00014419932,0.000011475021,0.000021731554,0.00021809983,0.99922085,0.0000032969265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025669152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042927813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16830294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022651863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041410276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5630294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541220344","doi":"","title":"Common Law and Equity in R3RUE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Equity (law); Common law; Restitution; Impossibility; Law and economics; Political science; Constructive; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10784921213275266,"score_gpt":0.38684703310390206,"score_spread":0.2789978209711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541220344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033680767,0.015429722,0.028478764,0.087263905,0.0011300673,0.000101411235,0.000085318185,0.00012092254,0.83370906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8796034,0.0026871436,0.004472011,0.023228692,0.0011171005,0.00015163983,0.000046515277,0.000114418894,0.08857899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853731,0.008129098,0.00052990287,0.0015779564,0.0023301162,0.0020598692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491936,0.003259013,0.0003273533,0.0005606191,0.0007057846,0.00022787222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010488344,0.00037869404,0.0006447045,0.0012786449,0.006115824,0.012503381,0.0013126164,0.007906001,0.004748446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012435621,0.00033902013,0.00074416614,0.0010870628,0.026511904,0.008864926,0.006027303,0.009419363,0.00076591276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014738085,0.0000017652019,0.000023665601,0.0000037783366,5.0961006e-7,0.000015983791,0.00047903036,0.000029443188,0.000013881437,0.99760383,0.00085859536,0.00096811337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102054755,0.000027332373,0.0004294618,0.0001517706,0.0000057740126,0.00008326318,0.0012165513,0.00043245027,0.00031706278,0.8408471,0.15645175,0.000027237633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019872703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015248084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019872703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010280948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005700867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0745939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542324191","doi":"","title":"The Shattered Mirror: Identity, Authority, and Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Identity politics; Identity (music); Sociology; Legitimacy; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04071937850929979,"score_gpt":0.34448933514093133,"score_spread":0.30376995663163153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542324191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19387811,0.031497113,0.0016869478,0.22530998,0.0008507089,0.000019303616,0.00006111005,0.00006762085,0.546629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97175455,0.0050064772,0.00026265057,0.0045004464,0.00022227837,0.00001167736,0.000012805981,0.00001754776,0.018211596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982316,0.0010577752,0.00003201298,0.00012526981,0.00032915117,0.00022417407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977354,0.0011527736,0.00023252437,0.00009729566,0.00018076146,0.00060116354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020841379,0.00013921822,0.00022124017,0.0012062013,0.011252941,0.010425247,0.0005777717,0.0017032009,0.0073030367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003411613,0.00019721773,0.000110307825,0.0010348744,0.026431894,0.009718048,0.003301887,0.003223702,0.0006935727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025976211,0.00009245508,0.007350236,0.00003900116,0.0000052551036,0.00029421868,0.11242623,0.000074341406,0.00008551757,0.7899488,0.050997004,0.038660895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023369621,0.00004355573,0.019852277,0.00049945473,0.000009253029,0.00049331563,0.2048696,0.00043095674,0.00015483846,0.48703697,0.2865418,0.0000447215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034952514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050130866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034952514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054574963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033108408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06949812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585518369","doi":"","title":"Don't Forget What We're Fighting For:Will the Fourth Amendment Be aCasualty of the War on Terror?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Terrorism; Nothing; Adversary; World trade center; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09693605398586946,"score_gpt":0.339664300370505,"score_spread":0.24272824638463553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585518369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021381082,0.045714643,0.00082929124,0.4841402,0.02007628,0.00008642574,0.00043794446,0.00012664303,0.44645044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18825455,0.06940006,0.0021775924,0.3278293,0.026082806,0.00056982035,0.00092297123,0.0003363717,0.3844266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959473,0.0018065395,0.0001128797,0.00035628144,0.0010942251,0.0006828467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946256,0.0031609912,0.00035056673,0.000267266,0.0010188926,0.00057658483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004820782,0.0004969107,0.0005202122,0.0009793404,0.0052489084,0.011889668,0.0017633296,0.0103121735,0.04448122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01961471,0.00024839226,0.0004304551,0.0014677361,0.0050118794,0.008881876,0.0016399613,0.01165243,0.010582884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021139589,0.000033039683,0.00037804883,0.0001775858,0.000004545758,0.0001130061,0.001019877,0.00011583026,0.0000722704,0.28532737,0.67081743,0.04191986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066296834,0.00001969651,0.0008339614,0.001779989,0.000008913204,0.00005339086,0.0024935661,0.000107374966,0.00008649793,0.048495285,0.9460866,0.000028132217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022701677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020218685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04448122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007079243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010627659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14880449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123532847","doi":"","title":"Proprietary Remedies in Insolvency: A Comparison of the Restatement (Third) of Restitution & Unjust Enrichment with English and Commonwealth Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Commonwealth; Unjust enrichment; Misrepresentation; Common law; Political science; Private law; English law; Tort; Mistake; Fiduciary; Pleading; Civil law (Civil law); Plaintiff; Sociology; Public law; Liability; Duty","score_opus":0.06400497655399724,"score_gpt":0.331066101320112,"score_spread":0.26706112476611477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123532847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11600286,0.0233079,0.0036783842,0.04390563,0.0006150628,0.00011717981,0.00008248609,0.000055861656,0.81223464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626157,0.0040642894,0.0007567515,0.00793037,0.00042903586,0.00010320189,0.000033085176,0.000034088956,0.024033345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98011786,0.008196428,0.00084044837,0.0010335115,0.007202619,0.0026091868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97888386,0.0149343815,0.0027142558,0.0011289173,0.001680589,0.0006579531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009435827,0.0002445644,0.00058701966,0.0035932339,0.0051523224,0.010163732,0.0015834399,0.006274188,0.01120001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034540743,0.00029706693,0.0011144334,0.0032878672,0.018836526,0.00806721,0.006530272,0.0058808485,0.00059438084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003083967,0.000056919213,0.0014363336,0.00007756398,0.0000115512075,0.0002020166,0.0057171807,0.00014810821,0.00005663921,0.97060645,0.0071620354,0.014494301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015265067,0.0004255161,0.08446932,0.0033205934,0.00020607574,0.0012911735,0.03322691,0.0028701965,0.0010909706,0.38496992,0.48783484,0.00014188566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015355879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021647971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015355879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011687341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008202642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08479798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125155995","doi":"","title":"Why Banks Are Not Allowed in Bankruptcy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receivership; Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Debtor; Creditor; Business; Restructuring; Finance; Financial system; Debt; Accounting","score_opus":0.019431616489813952,"score_gpt":0.23131024122013213,"score_spread":0.21187862473031818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125155995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043908954,0.027322078,0.002418899,0.537363,0.0067000506,0.000065842214,0.0013283477,0.0006220881,0.38027072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6621883,0.014009934,0.0011129661,0.17401506,0.0059953877,0.00016596935,0.00086254365,0.0004082546,0.14124154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554414,0.0010507087,0.00027874505,0.00064329547,0.0014672019,0.001015852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98574114,0.005387784,0.0020308392,0.00093526096,0.0037868177,0.0021181274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030830018,0.00017712744,0.00035918885,0.0009862126,0.003297194,0.0061052334,0.0009933539,0.0056642387,0.071850576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028802289,0.00034025495,0.00027208717,0.0014335432,0.0031147655,0.004079647,0.0016298122,0.0047040903,0.013834311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092310744,0.000042319323,0.018428845,0.00009877049,0.000012957611,0.00059446093,0.0015046526,0.00008286101,0.00017304567,0.13243446,0.771378,0.07515728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048987848,0.00004634097,0.025196042,0.0010413488,0.00001911208,0.0013122543,0.0038216778,0.0002743522,0.00033162994,0.07512376,0.89273995,0.00004453156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007502244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008950157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071850576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022536027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030921032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24036407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164543946","doi":"","title":"The Rhetoric of the Fourth Amendment: Toward a More Persuasive Fourth Amendment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Law; Rhetoric; Ethos; Supreme court; Persuasion; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Theology; Psychology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030643938652355575,"score_gpt":0.2938162550746398,"score_spread":0.2631723164222842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164543946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014677854,0.144913,0.026394287,0.21207191,0.029036848,0.00027451618,0.0005984625,0.00033369436,0.58490956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15557167,0.21703209,0.067952864,0.108263545,0.072623566,0.0019472555,0.0019246875,0.00078419707,0.37390018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921381,0.0040869797,0.0003009387,0.0005170121,0.002681245,0.0002757692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99018925,0.006411752,0.0007301221,0.00054025144,0.0017169648,0.0004117182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081882505,0.0009194529,0.0006187724,0.0046394453,0.0031807127,0.009664264,0.002182242,0.006492202,0.029986076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01747978,0.0005244796,0.00058506825,0.0046883393,0.007900244,0.009282749,0.00284188,0.009272218,0.0105477525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010296893,0.000029849058,0.0001237425,0.00027306387,0.000003427854,0.00004828656,0.00076950906,0.00019113702,0.00010337653,0.75664437,0.2066778,0.03512515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008204854,0.000026305657,0.00031548488,0.0015759186,0.0000056865074,0.0000639443,0.00039500147,0.00028909443,0.00013468284,0.17855898,0.81861013,0.000016574117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037622917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032288483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029986076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007851712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007802312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100313425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}