{"meta":{"query_hash":"7cf1fcd37a52","filters":{"venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":39,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":39,"exported":39,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7cf1fcd37a52","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Western+Journal+of+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W2342917094","doi":"","title":"To Govern is to Choose: A Critique of Ontario’s New Plan to Publicly Fund In Vitro Fertilization","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Business; Political science; Population; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.10011339574227526,"score_gpt":0.3786338556523023,"score_spread":0.27852045991002705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342917094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008174388,0.004037874,0.0018146161,0.82934177,0.0021090698,0.00011410649,0.00042056091,0.0000827294,0.15390491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33960304,0.0065451087,0.0045394492,0.46347335,0.003337305,0.00033756217,0.00033800997,0.00026645395,0.18155976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97461355,0.0031755893,0.0008831822,0.0021474883,0.014098555,0.005081563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97037876,0.010078372,0.0010343886,0.0011600993,0.012544668,0.004803631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019103132,0.00061926205,0.0007812343,0.0014618858,0.019455,0.009211201,0.004358751,0.014514373,0.0062530735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03421116,0.0011257591,0.0011111854,0.0024603794,0.020418819,0.004659204,0.0036696207,0.017518362,0.0008068556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006226125,0.000027664619,0.002634103,0.00016210982,0.00003104519,0.00027324774,0.009939716,0.0004911351,0.0002542652,0.58622336,0.3829012,0.016999926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010944641,0.000024222525,0.004760864,0.00029474654,0.000037058326,0.00008322354,0.003011943,0.0005580008,0.00019753106,0.025134522,0.9656772,0.000111303394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97777426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98763716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8477806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15221943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27435058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9833053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908018640","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6837","title":"Two Myths of Administrative Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Supreme court; Law; Administrative law; Judicial review; Deference; Political science; Duty; Legislature; Judicial deference; Standard of review; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Computer science","score_opus":0.15059853832563846,"score_gpt":0.45761073179224954,"score_spread":0.30701219346661107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908018640","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058650128,0.006297814,0.013827293,0.8897378,0.0027907842,0.000043458935,0.000045743018,0.00006942877,0.081322655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6302859,0.00981905,0.023702756,0.2777342,0.011064277,0.0006232746,0.00010252103,0.00021482867,0.046453193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696675,0.012972365,0.0010611865,0.0033859583,0.009349438,0.0035635887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644273,0.019765688,0.0020301668,0.0041718753,0.006765674,0.0028393124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03641128,0.00048348206,0.00075977447,0.0037413926,0.010271224,0.020529652,0.0039291973,0.010859332,0.0029059902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046790812,0.0005410768,0.0008223679,0.0019410703,0.11930995,0.018286368,0.007796555,0.021655707,0.0007807308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004536738,0.000010610948,0.000088641005,0.000017137072,0.0000018103074,0.000014860235,0.0029955856,0.000058068585,0.000020946458,0.98501635,0.008433811,0.0033376447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026317402,0.000019470432,0.00041428345,0.0002465114,0.0000040837003,0.00008474726,0.0042034662,0.0003924527,0.00015526373,0.8069525,0.18747154,0.000029411029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029426869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018737266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03641128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01932078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027175838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1925636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911311379","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6639","title":"The Misinformed Versus the Misunderstood","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Criminology; Parliament; Legislation; Restorative justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Sociology; Law; Public relations; Politics","score_opus":0.06623094173498524,"score_gpt":0.3590494476335482,"score_spread":0.29281850589856295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911311379","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10607127,0.080842264,0.0074342345,0.59320515,0.0153449625,0.00003932177,0.0002635925,0.00007923296,0.19672008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8125305,0.05451132,0.004700521,0.08423231,0.008889685,0.00005341021,0.00015924282,0.00014208753,0.0347809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99137574,0.005201508,0.00049953355,0.0005466386,0.0019176473,0.0004589426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987887,0.006699352,0.0021298274,0.00079618936,0.0019894543,0.0004982516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006903789,0.00032287394,0.0003267225,0.001546602,0.0029606575,0.009390416,0.0010131303,0.0027431715,0.0026578773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021838155,0.00019897736,0.00018148385,0.0015223112,0.01685441,0.010290913,0.0034492544,0.004847636,0.0008127549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000746847,0.00004719095,0.010789841,0.0009004039,0.00003121738,0.00088152575,0.25540686,0.00013274506,0.0009819558,0.5445271,0.06484686,0.121379614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008881714,0.00008877789,0.009053955,0.0038415967,0.00004844072,0.001743901,0.21972317,0.00042931433,0.0015231014,0.074102625,0.68936795,0.000068339345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006579853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01244201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009390416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029537012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042320117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036511123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913556084","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6838","title":"Whistleblowing in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Language change; Scope (computer science); Private sector; Public sector; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0530688293364164,"score_gpt":0.38527286743457756,"score_spread":0.3322040380981612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913556084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5721504,0.011210766,0.0009997353,0.09447779,0.0009545001,0.00023020865,0.0017454359,0.00014396674,0.3180873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89774865,0.007231121,0.0010521363,0.009764817,0.00007207079,0.000032351352,0.0004291347,0.000037294176,0.08363249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722904,0.00014487306,0.000059272348,0.00017375402,0.00090696296,0.0014860283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951141,0.00027645743,0.00025871594,0.00008246936,0.002323447,0.0019448651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011631625,0.0002008283,0.0003045285,0.0014921409,0.022041647,0.0041126665,0.0013122552,0.0015656577,0.0071250233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003983778,0.0002860727,0.00032030622,0.0032488788,0.0027896941,0.00079323835,0.0019357697,0.0028589827,0.00040774682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021547875,0.00038342708,0.13595107,0.00079766574,0.000072771254,0.004442631,0.061722904,0.0020421753,0.002112563,0.31124523,0.2769852,0.2040289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047410456,0.00009827901,0.18021658,0.000657537,0.00007587594,0.00057148817,0.066951476,0.001501813,0.0010046127,0.004741738,0.74396604,0.00016707845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99851054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13887812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33216208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914188791","doi":"","title":"“Pernicious [E]ffects”: Discretionary Decision-making in Queer Immigration to Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Immigration; Discretion; Political science; Immigration law; Refugee; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.01603359941016935,"score_gpt":0.35233080570206887,"score_spread":0.3362972062918995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914188791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73231477,0.0028149497,0.002675535,0.110675305,0.0003467412,0.00010929504,0.00025072007,0.00003333501,0.15077929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894539,0.00054744247,0.00040679972,0.0038794412,0.000018198863,0.000010384501,0.00003577984,0.000010862458,0.0056372858],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918765,0.002910468,0.00017732345,0.00052948494,0.0012332915,0.0032729108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904884,0.0027132223,0.0008002868,0.0004020175,0.0020187749,0.003577294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072337016,0.00025247905,0.0002782057,0.0008427186,0.029034903,0.010067022,0.0019319584,0.0021206895,0.0053137424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013663524,0.00025880837,0.00039605872,0.0014319427,0.025855714,0.0022401528,0.004549708,0.0060418695,0.00021637317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022260335,0.00018425625,0.1005175,0.000105965286,0.000072977105,0.0029347406,0.4485972,0.0019224063,0.0007262136,0.33587825,0.04952838,0.05930944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066634,0.000062449035,0.122048795,0.00084404746,0.000073952775,0.00061887555,0.6186393,0.003544857,0.0007116213,0.059260707,0.19378427,0.00034455353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10294258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10294258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15603106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7469042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914230872","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6826","title":"Good Intentions, Questionable Results","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Meaning (existential); Falling (accident); Child abuse; Occupational safety and health; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Environmental health; Law","score_opus":0.1001926285212023,"score_gpt":0.474419664970941,"score_spread":0.3742270364497387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914230872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05216725,0.0034687242,0.045651514,0.32104942,0.0037988168,0.0013035838,0.0008228142,0.0010484643,0.5706895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6963922,0.0025111833,0.035920605,0.10954579,0.00095150387,0.0013753675,0.00043577296,0.0006565708,0.15221104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9318601,0.036822744,0.0036169556,0.0035713105,0.018854124,0.005274774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87145704,0.049452826,0.008898198,0.031106507,0.03153891,0.00754651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.087714195,0.00069296686,0.00057327637,0.001651515,0.005152503,0.0066185677,0.0021957378,0.0044351714,0.029646447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20965226,0.0005167789,0.00073025073,0.0010106595,0.009909997,0.00455036,0.00461386,0.0051850104,0.013285016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028188375,0.00040043762,0.05022258,0.00082203146,0.00013933919,0.002725939,0.019369805,0.0005121372,0.0014592543,0.41172943,0.2202687,0.29206845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014652389,0.00042718707,0.027621,0.0022936428,0.00015812535,0.0037351265,0.01835909,0.0018223963,0.004037466,0.3466584,0.5945886,0.00015250944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078476425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009906815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087714195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003582506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01215859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46388257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949654254","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8075","title":"School Nurses: An Indispensable Resource for Health Promotion in Ontario's Children and Adolescents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"School Health and Nursing Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health promotion; Nursing; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Promotion (chess); School nursing; Scope (computer science); Plan (archaeology); Medicine; Public health; Resource (disambiguation); Public relations; Medical education; Psychology; Business; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07444671801681947,"score_gpt":0.45641686414439364,"score_spread":0.3819701461275742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949654254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31471342,0.022720126,0.0032781216,0.22588322,0.0036085725,0.0018485565,0.0035226543,0.0012491116,0.4231762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5963169,0.025220577,0.017472353,0.013219751,0.0008848555,0.0008952351,0.0016060503,0.00034428586,0.34403995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985378,0.00029201352,0.000076509,0.000072506235,0.00063033425,0.00039086517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920948,0.00044060766,0.0005732296,0.00022209375,0.002037061,0.0046322145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020518748,0.00022440545,0.00025217736,0.0011886752,0.008056255,0.0024131162,0.0008434364,0.00072687154,0.021766374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038958478,0.00041124766,0.0002058303,0.0014110364,0.0017110165,0.0008600488,0.0023427233,0.00096467993,0.0028557016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086153836,0.00023562169,0.108715065,0.00088940683,0.000018531438,0.0016329936,0.048470534,0.00012606534,0.0023653354,0.0048221536,0.47936618,0.35327196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022475644,0.0000534642,0.09878509,0.00043761963,0.000013166749,0.00016236183,0.020119444,0.00004948423,0.00014939366,0.00028287742,0.8799019,0.000022706234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87139285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96113306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12860715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021016043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1631023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25872904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950072084","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8070","title":"Dancing in the Dark: An Analysis of the Live Entertainment Industry and the Deceptive Market Practices of Ticketmaster and Live Nation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Entertainment; Ticket; Legislation; Business; Entertainment industry; Advertising; Marketing; Unfair competition; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05865512794272326,"score_gpt":0.3462002751063588,"score_spread":0.28754514716363555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950072084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91542965,0.0012946972,0.0006109324,0.007736503,0.000026310265,0.000037536633,0.000054333952,0.0000035777502,0.07480648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921252,0.00086818414,0.00021508563,0.0008088659,0.000020978832,0.000014880264,0.00003689517,0.00000654501,0.005903336],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678123,0.0016005116,0.00008563821,0.000145917,0.0006903306,0.0006962414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900742,0.0047680787,0.0025714755,0.0003604467,0.001249513,0.00097630545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003500673,0.00024162525,0.00027045698,0.0038225746,0.006545767,0.005873165,0.0012358503,0.0019727226,0.005687967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008370742,0.00017896431,0.0002857911,0.0032412629,0.010917264,0.0064042066,0.0034145082,0.0031485076,0.00047072052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007538635,0.0004201658,0.11442445,0.00016687051,0.000024689474,0.0021898116,0.704721,0.0001514079,0.00040580574,0.1392477,0.0053921123,0.0327806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061596825,0.00005662454,0.08368906,0.00026902554,0.00001373125,0.00039043254,0.8902678,0.0005368089,0.00013801457,0.005620294,0.0189934,0.000018716952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05389223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106467314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05389223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006794474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055409004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10715705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951586099","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8073","title":"Gender Diversity in the Boardroom: Raising Questions About the \"Comply or Explain\" Model and Targets in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Argument (complex analysis); Diversity (politics); Accounting; Representation (politics); Gender diversity; Corporate title; Order (exchange); Chief executive officer; Raising (metalworking); Public relations; Business case; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Management; Law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.25040250078901255,"score_gpt":0.34490009174044417,"score_spread":0.09449759095143162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951586099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8284584,0.0094437385,0.0022558856,0.09318068,0.00047216087,0.0001573174,0.0009467297,0.000023523315,0.06506155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927691,0.00105064,0.00031693585,0.0042184754,0.00003530138,0.000028200864,0.00012823759,0.000014478705,0.0014386529],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.971227,0.006123009,0.0008536072,0.0026308328,0.012349512,0.006816053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9406639,0.024041142,0.0072528557,0.0020101403,0.017630605,0.008401426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029800836,0.00032017461,0.001061402,0.0030624396,0.019354876,0.00812132,0.0042037587,0.0020706502,0.003570029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08475589,0.0004960478,0.00078469544,0.0059069125,0.012768566,0.004689724,0.0064935246,0.0046624863,0.00011560231],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044084943,0.00024098456,0.4681842,0.0007018638,0.0003428408,0.00066844653,0.21203826,0.0010528745,0.00047833082,0.18330565,0.032331508,0.10021419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016184725,0.00013618953,0.62626135,0.003350294,0.00046632925,0.00019375402,0.2370078,0.0030688928,0.0010594961,0.033938117,0.09406138,0.0002945475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16223143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16223143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23324262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9716928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952048328","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8076","title":"A Wall Between the \"Public\" and the \"Private\": A Comment on Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v Wall","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Judicial opinion; Charter; State (computer science); Prima facie; Judicial discretion; Accountability; Judicial activism; Politics","score_opus":0.045239658811208436,"score_gpt":0.3119905186116866,"score_spread":0.26675085980047814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952048328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062886745,0.0038850247,0.0009348219,0.85884666,0.004395512,0.00006324927,0.00010597371,0.000040857598,0.0688412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35388345,0.0019622755,0.0007807022,0.5946267,0.0026287276,0.00009656604,0.00005178626,0.00012165369,0.045848113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923942,0.002023676,0.00023958323,0.0009043424,0.0013052445,0.0031329812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884366,0.008411595,0.0004026821,0.00023508306,0.0013784169,0.0011357663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007829586,0.00061466784,0.00077255664,0.0008889993,0.041426454,0.012054915,0.004348732,0.03888829,0.0032718393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016221778,0.0012004457,0.00106771,0.0012066718,0.017242188,0.004608592,0.0040685665,0.038822096,0.00048229867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008637116,0.00007380429,0.0031729527,0.00014240741,0.00004558547,0.0067480695,0.08316642,0.0003426586,0.001333191,0.42214978,0.47597364,0.006765084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063030755,0.000074818185,0.006739917,0.000828073,0.00009677319,0.0008391927,0.11071979,0.0006787673,0.0021611024,0.024643933,0.8528518,0.0003029186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56930137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7204497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56930137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022279365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024616692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8664702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952395119","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8072","title":"Direct Discrimination and Indirect Discrimination: A Distinction with a Difference","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Liability; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.06030698181602328,"score_gpt":0.34564452272424473,"score_spread":0.28533754090822144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952395119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036978204,0.0072649647,0.03908706,0.15142652,0.0025690973,0.00018692638,0.00034366274,0.00009442411,0.7620491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879377,0.0024673413,0.01312169,0.032044083,0.0016573407,0.00030115957,0.00015341907,0.000116859075,0.062200375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885811,0.0022141633,0.00043947448,0.0014509908,0.0051568868,0.0021573224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942972,0.0022954615,0.00032610574,0.0009484062,0.001349539,0.00078327395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070052017,0.0005128493,0.00087619043,0.0022045267,0.0054866276,0.010570718,0.0026689477,0.009499267,0.0068430286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012351622,0.00048093242,0.0008896412,0.0014061347,0.05825241,0.013906721,0.0086968895,0.013658313,0.0011480871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005417515,0.00000509691,0.00019232134,0.000010115885,0.0000013008869,0.00002384482,0.0010005538,0.000010425388,0.00007529171,0.9948219,0.0015828011,0.0022708382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028915234,0.00003061809,0.0017269303,0.00015806609,0.000018452069,0.0002589505,0.002832125,0.00028009052,0.00027544773,0.9128835,0.081468806,0.000038086444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036113426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039914165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036113426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008715948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009410322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07180649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952879402","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8069","title":"Assessing the Damage: Money Awards by the OHRT in Sexual Harassment Cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Damages; Entitlement (fair division); Psychology; Tribunal; Criminology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.10727226551777226,"score_gpt":0.44547524043829306,"score_spread":0.3382029749205208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952879402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551935,0.00056087866,0.00057929964,0.0017852059,0.00006500845,0.00013593525,0.00019151047,0.000008207722,0.04148055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975025,0.00025634363,0.000260893,0.00008582794,0.0000237632,0.000017138907,0.00006477045,0.000001613589,0.0017870993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989321,0.0027396104,0.0010825789,0.00024476377,0.0050103166,0.0016017882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857684,0.004041678,0.0052018417,0.0004021075,0.0030712988,0.0015147175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077290474,0.00028454373,0.00037205042,0.007435394,0.0025970098,0.003374933,0.0013004316,0.0015264468,0.0039440617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039900728,0.0003039226,0.00045129427,0.0037772914,0.0028890413,0.0030839837,0.0046695154,0.0018931329,0.00048492258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040359827,0.0003643834,0.8877483,0.00017005707,0.00013374958,0.0050166673,0.012954872,0.002159275,0.00054198294,0.025295682,0.005433474,0.059777897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024496137,0.0005647712,0.9437825,0.0003130662,0.00015558292,0.002300621,0.033320397,0.0032153542,0.00074939243,0.0071273725,0.008375949,0.000070519454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04819863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13532785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04819863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062596877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025179905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09583616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015260480","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i1.10229","title":"The Evolution of the Duty to Consult","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Duty; Supreme court; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Subject (documents); Law; Indigenous; Work (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Process (computing); Abandonment (legal); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04893452292364313,"score_gpt":0.3429191904893343,"score_spread":0.29398466756569114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015260480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0604318,0.0040119826,0.046212595,0.36980453,0.0013707143,0.00016449102,0.000065225664,0.00013874708,0.5178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90536404,0.0013576036,0.01552405,0.046734188,0.00066567736,0.00018020564,0.00003635863,0.00014670663,0.02999117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9306765,0.032661334,0.003524783,0.0084907785,0.018853428,0.005793304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89426553,0.06531058,0.0048355474,0.010261167,0.017374804,0.007952286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045033514,0.0002345778,0.00063555944,0.0025194953,0.020585367,0.01982776,0.0039431495,0.024157424,0.0055958414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12909888,0.0008743956,0.0006799612,0.0019497938,0.07905618,0.016969282,0.0153771555,0.022680512,0.001054231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007482007,0.000012757873,0.00032809973,0.000017627925,0.000002157602,0.0001587229,0.010214547,0.00011021415,0.000122050755,0.9767769,0.0041642194,0.0080851745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002505694,0.00004173622,0.0017937571,0.00054939743,0.000011402335,0.0007645507,0.012842464,0.0012175663,0.0004949507,0.6713219,0.31084362,0.00009349625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029136833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020830607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045033514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026696395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031744365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23816282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015269964","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i1.8102","title":"That Most Canadian of Virtues","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"JDSU (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Charter; Political science; CLARITY; Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Sociology; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07866970055343833,"score_gpt":0.34252095830733287,"score_spread":0.2638512577538945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015269964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01397586,0.0007946143,0.0014149648,0.018036364,0.000849025,0.00002560543,0.00013618481,0.00006180665,0.9647056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45791107,0.0010620684,0.0016585643,0.02803851,0.00034047876,0.00005415926,0.00019169938,0.00011115006,0.5106323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731135,0.00047545307,0.000053047777,0.00050722976,0.0008744345,0.0007785203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997488,0.0002717293,0.0001410466,0.00031434064,0.00116246,0.0006224171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021476091,0.00021208424,0.00034598846,0.0008646247,0.01026665,0.0071271355,0.00052180636,0.0015676991,0.03606857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00499271,0.00020801158,0.00027801425,0.001096566,0.011540654,0.0028675718,0.0031930583,0.0044173445,0.0046824357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019461115,0.000016005744,0.0020693664,0.000028816412,0.000005593497,0.00008895604,0.008377802,0.00003251961,0.00016768638,0.8971739,0.071537964,0.020481918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046954756,0.000009400659,0.0017696837,0.000056674362,0.000005202356,0.00010358942,0.0042338734,0.00004383918,0.0000731066,0.031011688,0.9626745,0.000013756382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17341949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28711978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8265805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073558297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012347224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34482014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015362568","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i1.8544","title":"Immigration Detention and Habeas Corpus","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Law; Statute; Supreme court; Immigration detention; Political science; Immigration; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.09933778993472461,"score_gpt":0.3638551638361494,"score_spread":0.2645173739014248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015362568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40909168,0.006347843,0.008463488,0.056233626,0.002023565,0.0005032404,0.00080061983,0.00026000032,0.51627594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9337403,0.0012004798,0.0030484167,0.021793928,0.00037313628,0.00020167152,0.00015812601,0.000046606023,0.039437406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854779,0.004500587,0.0008235149,0.0013068819,0.0040495875,0.0038415096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807993,0.011197746,0.0018281874,0.0007781075,0.0041309786,0.0012655576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009135996,0.00031466407,0.00035733872,0.0017449537,0.012716756,0.006757146,0.0023309516,0.0050092647,0.0035039533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029862817,0.0006796796,0.0005483169,0.0018409394,0.009575657,0.0031791395,0.0058514224,0.0072692167,0.00035014254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025439778,0.00013224542,0.027253253,0.000495975,0.00006582627,0.004747092,0.04130873,0.0026257879,0.0021484734,0.7709595,0.08476666,0.06524204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014303654,0.00050270703,0.16160503,0.0019206038,0.00025356238,0.0023716101,0.0664995,0.0052135433,0.005456436,0.08711792,0.66830325,0.00061281136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38316077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68320775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38316077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018072486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03346936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7618611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3058353719","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9445","title":"Rethinking Post-Rana Plaza Transnational Labour Governance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Empowerment; Factory (object-oriented programming); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Labour law; Human rights; Global governance; Work (physics); Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Management; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0654914267263827,"score_gpt":0.3402990713303387,"score_spread":0.274807644603956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3058353719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4342504,0.0021334558,0.029809238,0.027332388,0.00020889085,0.00022515816,0.00009492942,0.000093871524,0.5058516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811802,0.00060594024,0.001926171,0.0007183092,0.000018308954,0.00006486614,0.000025671636,0.000025952853,0.015434583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584216,0.002044726,0.00016458744,0.0006671337,0.0005407712,0.0007407244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756515,0.0010555962,0.00037710124,0.00045279087,0.00032669862,0.00022273962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006546868,0.00026014625,0.00020559946,0.000806751,0.004953567,0.008052803,0.0010791313,0.0016824668,0.004975145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054106168,0.00028959263,0.00024323797,0.0012053319,0.012941774,0.005199599,0.008217711,0.002857284,0.0005011117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033380093,0.000038801285,0.009019105,0.00016208144,0.000015693757,0.0010263957,0.15436089,0.0011943051,0.0016622404,0.77762645,0.002179992,0.052680634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021224034,0.00016379145,0.033818748,0.0010148172,0.000029074097,0.00045797264,0.21721707,0.0017926918,0.0012389241,0.18052769,0.5636296,0.00008831591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018847343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04272999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018847343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008103923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074270577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058798373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3061143068","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9461","title":"Retreating to Justiciability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Subjectivity; Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Moral agency; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12165769100275119,"score_gpt":0.38900445348464635,"score_spread":0.26734676248189515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3061143068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19235651,0.00270086,0.038566783,0.053407565,0.00058217,0.0004000997,0.00007733279,0.00008640378,0.7118222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98289293,0.00040923257,0.0022501503,0.0047025336,0.00011659968,0.00008293435,0.000027543165,0.000034324243,0.009483779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9363014,0.01987491,0.0024403364,0.0063174698,0.026843108,0.008222723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9094612,0.047501646,0.0058147586,0.0067444723,0.027042774,0.0034351533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0361438,0.0006213223,0.0009269472,0.003930709,0.013883069,0.013344641,0.002759905,0.0036812464,0.0058019627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14082424,0.00041797885,0.00075611466,0.0020992165,0.051365398,0.011459254,0.010345543,0.010771212,0.00055355445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031282714,0.000025243897,0.0042959214,0.00006663457,0.000012465615,0.00030202634,0.031985436,0.00034674033,0.00063892035,0.93607855,0.0032398554,0.022976942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040435123,0.00008774787,0.015285993,0.0006213699,0.000050383114,0.00027521118,0.031965088,0.0018229274,0.0021457858,0.76996285,0.17759907,0.00014330083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22866705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2072178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22866705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02972239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03593309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4546721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3071865145","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9478","title":"On Sexual Consent in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Spouse; Criminal code; Criminal law; Dilemma; KISS (TNC); Context (archaeology); Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Medical emergency; Computer science","score_opus":0.10991924886255602,"score_gpt":0.3537178499598585,"score_spread":0.24379860109730248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3071865145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11254532,0.020619318,0.0019613428,0.2738009,0.0021709877,0.00029683494,0.00083002396,0.00007081384,0.5877044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7613162,0.017877327,0.0019498622,0.08981136,0.00036239947,0.00014130455,0.00031949906,0.00007022346,0.12815188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98863775,0.0014492358,0.00038612232,0.00088500755,0.003920735,0.004721139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854659,0.0045730965,0.00051964674,0.00046763904,0.005631223,0.0033425598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006618204,0.00033784716,0.00046319107,0.0013798521,0.026417982,0.006535035,0.002148339,0.0057309177,0.011146909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021861162,0.0005360439,0.0005001325,0.0026835878,0.011970473,0.0029460746,0.005757377,0.007961374,0.00050624734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039895975,0.00005828072,0.00816076,0.00015891159,0.000013385621,0.0012490022,0.028802976,0.0005506209,0.0003504542,0.7980365,0.11165903,0.05092008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006208429,0.00005978,0.025125902,0.0009861828,0.00004566101,0.00059728225,0.030835818,0.0010921407,0.0005252701,0.042691816,0.8977415,0.0002364286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99573827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99695563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15339443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15339443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42577523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208920815","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v11i1.10784","title":"Nihkitimahkinawow ekwa Nihkitimahkisin: Pity and Compassion in Cree Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pity; Compassion; Kindness; Sustenance; Indigenous; Possession (linguistics); Sociology; Meaning (existential); Duty; Law; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04249409696012688,"score_gpt":0.36800694087272834,"score_spread":0.32551284391260144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208920815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43631056,0.009080494,0.0030606554,0.033191606,0.0005438265,0.00008123301,0.00003024262,0.000030439149,0.5176709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96763784,0.0012114737,0.00038155323,0.0017872496,0.00003190267,0.000034315075,0.000007692709,0.00001739272,0.028890563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900824,0.0004684041,0.000026494161,0.00009620862,0.000117657146,0.0002830972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922,0.00041337925,0.00011796705,0.000047334495,0.00009510611,0.00010623095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016088026,0.00029418792,0.00027424018,0.0004822097,0.012942518,0.0064306976,0.0008757301,0.002771643,0.003859697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021705653,0.000343051,0.00016249731,0.0006589505,0.031707767,0.007173383,0.0046106423,0.0041360296,0.00035374434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015872469,0.00004585433,0.0013006966,0.00007674249,0.0000030308624,0.001487507,0.64830774,0.000047045032,0.00042262307,0.33324775,0.0046703774,0.010374796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010950104,0.00003654594,0.005022119,0.00054473476,0.000011070392,0.0010414867,0.6843327,0.00019111669,0.0007251291,0.04957261,0.25847146,0.000040093066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020872533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04043083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020872533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005718777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041929395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04150206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208924544","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v12i1.13620","title":"Status Quo Sorrows: The Failures of Energy Project Consultations and Reconciliatory Paths Forward","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Veto; Jurisprudence; Transparency (behavior); Status quo; Equity (law); Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Constitution; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03754162049684355,"score_gpt":0.34712959639173496,"score_spread":0.3095879758948914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208924544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058874942,0.0037025197,0.016743826,0.7921333,0.0010130383,0.00019024589,0.0000786567,0.00015018776,0.12711337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93679345,0.001316049,0.00690274,0.039102208,0.0004001895,0.00022826217,0.00003042738,0.00012974991,0.015096772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8528698,0.09098801,0.0031177446,0.007289233,0.030702228,0.015033086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84284747,0.11453256,0.0075080805,0.008047562,0.019822458,0.0072418666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12120751,0.00049379066,0.000743767,0.0025780054,0.055038135,0.028234988,0.0058327285,0.017885162,0.0046907235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18258329,0.00097191037,0.0006988385,0.0038859472,0.09408379,0.016818164,0.015642159,0.025813477,0.0005202569],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019131025,0.000017286655,0.0005731418,0.00007184319,0.000010401904,0.00025103494,0.07777677,0.0003375336,0.0001030318,0.8869591,0.01728397,0.016596857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008029787,0.00004099266,0.0018955782,0.0007419267,0.000032654374,0.0002492887,0.14017004,0.0028599622,0.0005884365,0.52581847,0.32737538,0.00014702286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47902495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.512371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47902495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08579193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20286083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9524734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210291968","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v12i1.13636","title":"COVID-19 Pandemic and Structural Barriers for Migrant Agricultural Workers in Ontario","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Vulnerability (computing); Legislature; Immigration; Harm; Agriculture; Migrant workers; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Political science; Development economics; Business; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.09260932131223008,"score_gpt":0.3099912550672101,"score_spread":0.21738193375498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210291968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90781707,0.001381596,0.00031587534,0.036382645,0.000039092927,0.00005065789,0.00087009446,0.000010790152,0.053132273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927787,0.0008052192,0.00010448158,0.0006561731,0.000013672965,0.00001185577,0.00013153457,0.0000029294927,0.005495409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909747,0.000082062725,0.00001644021,0.000038858518,0.0001755314,0.0005896777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981773,0.00039436657,0.00034921765,0.000044534,0.0004185919,0.00061591546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007951846,0.00010543159,0.00020127093,0.00052469835,0.0052952147,0.0022192132,0.0006635133,0.00093747396,0.00566088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038271204,0.00012456236,0.00018285711,0.0010080434,0.0024171625,0.0007554733,0.0014381517,0.0011877007,0.0001331257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031246827,0.00021436976,0.58564883,0.0003201923,0.00007189936,0.0034424213,0.054501414,0.0053715147,0.0010908877,0.24589151,0.056565486,0.04656901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007794024,0.00008297313,0.77021796,0.00050146977,0.000057264915,0.00026506063,0.09496714,0.0055273524,0.00029484383,0.020966772,0.10694222,0.00009903062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07375941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07375941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078761175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5351645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216272443","doi":"","title":"Runaway Jurors: Independent Juror Research in the Internet Age","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Psychology; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.14504485947037277,"score_gpt":0.4386102378614654,"score_spread":0.29356537839109265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216272443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97260475,0.0024227537,0.00031885275,0.005018421,0.00014959014,0.0000735252,0.00011217565,0.000008311296,0.019291617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885649,0.0023314815,0.00028067103,0.0016144133,0.00023869633,0.00013734236,0.00009992814,0.000018326185,0.006714228],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98990214,0.006349617,0.0004768052,0.00067911734,0.001520595,0.0010716042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8790193,0.085000634,0.01158645,0.0058299517,0.011546718,0.007016886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019804297,0.00029245016,0.00077382947,0.0058198166,0.008929962,0.009192899,0.0015577616,0.003250295,0.020808639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11101425,0.00055784656,0.00033535797,0.0041248007,0.0058150426,0.011168096,0.0045918515,0.003992415,0.0019257179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011289984,0.002721344,0.32971182,0.000607361,0.00017455219,0.0022070284,0.47229594,0.00012827048,0.00070877327,0.024596075,0.019824795,0.14589503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101126636,0.00055303203,0.27262047,0.0012358108,0.00014181976,0.0008527179,0.6825763,0.0003032308,0.00079495314,0.009854275,0.030855138,0.00011113252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009635276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024028206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020808639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002232507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005470206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10473639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235363811","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v11i1.10724","title":"Galambos v Perez, its Critics, and the Equity-Certainty Paradox in Fiduciary Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Fiduciary; Equity (law); Post hoc; Supreme court; Law and economics; Certainty; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Duty; Medicine","score_opus":0.09636965377138822,"score_gpt":0.4299462558601999,"score_spread":0.3335766020888117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235363811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08273813,0.014606186,0.017134918,0.3561245,0.0008445619,0.000055228877,0.0001175667,0.000090890964,0.52828795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623995,0.0017103538,0.0014757366,0.022590682,0.00032209928,0.000030356625,0.000015733212,0.000032509968,0.011423027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934629,0.0017001429,0.00014901727,0.000743728,0.0029724631,0.0009717713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99195683,0.004356294,0.0006238108,0.0006074234,0.0018044676,0.0006511872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007401889,0.00030549508,0.00052420923,0.0020580208,0.009930444,0.007987767,0.0021038183,0.006894413,0.0020137785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021967787,0.00028477822,0.00034814014,0.0019610901,0.041502696,0.0043097804,0.0040926384,0.009564773,0.0002071909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031325083,0.0000016239479,0.00017916677,0.0000064320398,0.0000017043192,0.000022475217,0.0007450506,0.000076904274,0.000013945786,0.9941948,0.0027263726,0.002028326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000203321,0.000010003969,0.0015596909,0.00020892467,0.000018665862,0.00009048384,0.0020895498,0.0006920694,0.00025279188,0.892609,0.10240711,0.00004144023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39596123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33897847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39596123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023319254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02125902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.787313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237406470","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6836","title":"Runaway Jurors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06518602737449636,"score_gpt":0.42273003252261937,"score_spread":0.357544005148123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237406470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44635227,0.02133744,0.06514553,0.12886761,0.005640285,0.0025663085,0.0004933413,0.00038992654,0.3292072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8759015,0.0036725088,0.0126945805,0.035080463,0.0008896664,0.0010887631,0.00017980488,0.00006835587,0.07042445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9288388,0.032020938,0.0038246326,0.008099204,0.021068204,0.0061482014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82726943,0.1052905,0.01874521,0.017785482,0.022009714,0.008899664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.064344965,0.00055958744,0.0016489939,0.0035892853,0.012936159,0.0076548695,0.0034245064,0.0060512926,0.013941492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19804274,0.0008724839,0.0010326427,0.0013703443,0.008974107,0.0063038836,0.0086364215,0.008646156,0.002725392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009376731,0.00040000153,0.03237683,0.0010888282,0.00025170355,0.0023966013,0.030013824,0.000978896,0.0022974648,0.5013557,0.06686607,0.36103642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031991897,0.001173626,0.042129688,0.0068347733,0.00038149543,0.0028904187,0.044181664,0.0024515747,0.005876724,0.35436854,0.53891176,0.00047975857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108528035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028753595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064344965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047902656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018523997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34029275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280498886","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v13i1.14339","title":"Examining Labour Rights Enforcement Mechanisms in NAFTA and the USMCA and its Impact on Labour Conditions in Mexico","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Free trade agreement; Workforce; Government (linguistics); Labour law; Political science; Economics; International trade; Free trade; Labour economics; Development economics; Law","score_opus":0.04142964493118548,"score_gpt":0.3625951705745123,"score_spread":0.3211655256433268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280498886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980149,0.0015228743,0.0001729408,0.004368381,0.000029189523,0.000035036315,0.00040299274,0.0000057479274,0.013313926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952459,0.0011986748,0.00019942907,0.00044082044,0.000031050007,0.000052586296,0.00032354944,0.0000032595865,0.0025048407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861896,0.0002753089,0.00005772753,0.0001403703,0.00032204157,0.0005856064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954041,0.0010769994,0.0021663767,0.00013987573,0.00089436455,0.0003182329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019851283,0.00012361574,0.00024151747,0.0012830757,0.0024680088,0.0027340504,0.00066648255,0.0008379415,0.003137452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066111456,0.00014339367,0.00028180398,0.0018819359,0.0013051578,0.0011525408,0.002033823,0.0013021319,0.00010185404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020820841,0.00032652268,0.910762,0.00021785041,0.00012284999,0.00083897554,0.009422363,0.0012244495,0.0006343603,0.04074957,0.0048697456,0.030623164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017495273,0.000067446854,0.9634478,0.00024259304,0.000075060714,0.000052622872,0.017076898,0.00042760602,0.00025575692,0.0008616967,0.017457632,0.000017404527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45730802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49701717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45730802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008704271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007666586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9092924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280572051","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v13i1.14603","title":"Jury Strikes Back","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Economic Justice; Jury trial; Political science; Civil procedure; Pandemic; Law; Criminology; Public administration; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.12184795208378905,"score_gpt":0.4381770377505677,"score_spread":0.31632908566677864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280572051","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029075917,0.00713622,0.0028350225,0.48685947,0.012955725,0.0004133995,0.001359633,0.00031147266,0.45905316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35641786,0.005683752,0.0023652292,0.24381788,0.004280156,0.0003135032,0.00094161445,0.00026237665,0.38591766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97965336,0.0031494522,0.0010720481,0.002453081,0.00901881,0.004653168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733194,0.0063047213,0.0011054877,0.0022452152,0.011278986,0.005746057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016287383,0.00048101126,0.0012648767,0.0016848545,0.02370687,0.010230798,0.0044284286,0.011814073,0.046565626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06493712,0.00068983994,0.00095662056,0.0015611871,0.01111318,0.004191441,0.0059873555,0.012414182,0.0062973993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026613765,0.00006592899,0.006071177,0.00028339366,0.000064276086,0.0009969218,0.0055812434,0.0003343632,0.0004593568,0.22691345,0.7050575,0.05390624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010282874,0.00011083459,0.00875959,0.0006026027,0.000054599484,0.00022130703,0.0043139323,0.00030355487,0.00052152807,0.019018486,0.9659168,0.00007384408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66097724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8167622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66097724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06229866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114480026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68203866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318773428","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.15360","title":"Contract Law’s Red Herring: Exposing “Intention” as a Guise for Consideration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Political science; Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14382678537832502,"score_gpt":0.43763462453772106,"score_spread":0.293807839159396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318773428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07155105,0.005861722,0.15657122,0.077162094,0.0009224189,0.00017492159,0.00006375242,0.00011170187,0.68758106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656185,0.0007703813,0.012851566,0.0065750396,0.0003665694,0.00016754802,0.000023667262,0.00007106808,0.013555641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981191,0.011494012,0.0005202447,0.001100355,0.004120146,0.0015742006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832797,0.01129231,0.001057595,0.0017923167,0.0019043301,0.0006737116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01824693,0.00044941375,0.00045897852,0.0020042935,0.0068321065,0.012362475,0.0017892647,0.0049740523,0.0035042197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024597319,0.0004654899,0.00093404995,0.0014789581,0.05918292,0.012780492,0.005964811,0.008796292,0.00047273072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028747563,0.0000033485078,0.00016236382,0.000007231418,0.0000013458109,0.000022243852,0.0022700839,0.000048116603,0.00002734684,0.9954204,0.00036798514,0.0016666972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075634302,0.00002573015,0.0005279346,0.00013975218,0.000008895783,0.00008392816,0.003972964,0.0006828506,0.00023185642,0.9455477,0.048751302,0.000019555062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00988861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068848594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01824693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00684079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008021333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09650016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816809","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.14627","title":"Wrongly Imprisoned, Released as a Pauper: Canada’s Ineffective Approach to Innocence Compensation and Avenues for Reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Compensation (psychology); Statutory law; Status quo; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Payment; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.06828437774955226,"score_gpt":0.37404854191733944,"score_spread":0.3057641641677872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318816809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048267517,0.016305711,0.0039677955,0.813262,0.0009422326,0.00012183847,0.0001621225,0.000083845036,0.11688694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229419,0.017141081,0.0054139853,0.12344132,0.0004687308,0.00008851993,0.00012930119,0.00007763959,0.03029755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836956,0.0029493673,0.00044717477,0.001124941,0.006061479,0.0057214415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97944826,0.0056464355,0.0008532277,0.0007750434,0.008867199,0.004409787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125861345,0.0005258346,0.00062901893,0.0039010397,0.029330708,0.017504897,0.0053710574,0.007554166,0.003565559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022076065,0.00044927734,0.00058493833,0.004798616,0.026005564,0.0047253924,0.005083757,0.013385178,0.00032600472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030639636,0.00008256922,0.0067418395,0.00029860376,0.00003270181,0.000603561,0.015416529,0.0012918623,0.0003399207,0.8203082,0.084682375,0.070171244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106289895,0.000117779826,0.039937098,0.0029420934,0.00022584642,0.0005677099,0.09082036,0.005864545,0.0012100303,0.18009509,0.67768997,0.00042320046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99092776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99617755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22872864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22872864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4253701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89456546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318830002","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.14341","title":"Indeterminate Sentences and Section 12 of the Charter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Indeterminate; Law; Punishment (psychology); Judicial review; Legislature; Political science; Section (typography); Contemplation; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Supreme court; Social psychology; Business; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10035924538342822,"score_gpt":0.4207020686485382,"score_spread":0.32034282326511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318830002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11577042,0.0047875843,0.053688742,0.0997801,0.006006299,0.0006158391,0.0007893057,0.0007389019,0.7178228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557947,0.0012001054,0.021299025,0.035507146,0.0023027018,0.00092991226,0.00027643098,0.00013148507,0.08255855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98233265,0.0070606563,0.001520833,0.0017643099,0.0050825477,0.0022390045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781773,0.012849842,0.0027854526,0.0020277551,0.003242752,0.0009169401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013127139,0.00035285548,0.0003506705,0.00059505814,0.00392089,0.005302001,0.0011890121,0.006323949,0.0029023134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029905502,0.00045756405,0.00045740357,0.00038646956,0.009694298,0.0028146706,0.0021333606,0.0073433584,0.00089042605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004207893,0.0000308096,0.00084247557,0.000029366249,0.0000032021776,0.00014967141,0.0023558962,0.00027306116,0.0005216461,0.9599996,0.025790375,0.009961777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008849008,0.00044494148,0.008416425,0.00041029704,0.0000467919,0.0006882525,0.0019215471,0.0017512034,0.0023613847,0.35606495,0.627496,0.00030981598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013721333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017999973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013721333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025816457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011121415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069423735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319811782","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.15144","title":"Harm Reduction in Prisons: Restraints within the Prisoners’ Rights Discourse","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Harm; Harm reduction; Political science; Mainstream; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Stakeholder; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine; Public health; Nursing","score_opus":0.06952061025016237,"score_gpt":0.398999660842085,"score_spread":0.3294790505919226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319811782","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12402006,0.014829132,0.01002924,0.663521,0.0018442572,0.000052622945,0.00002298663,0.00007421173,0.18560645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96877944,0.002166399,0.0013032347,0.01761039,0.0007089556,0.00005093849,0.000005788418,0.000027957147,0.009346837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97037977,0.021279648,0.0013203273,0.0014253451,0.0032561074,0.0023388225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696266,0.024251346,0.00189299,0.0012912408,0.0018064606,0.0011314248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026547194,0.00040342406,0.00066814304,0.0018672263,0.018239312,0.018452201,0.002466144,0.010462552,0.0024333794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026198903,0.00038976007,0.000596162,0.0010527726,0.08483439,0.014626745,0.011091171,0.012639239,0.0002081447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007315626,0.000028132434,0.00035098704,0.00006032791,0.0000048682455,0.00022852464,0.0912556,0.00007168367,0.000113542825,0.90004575,0.0028394859,0.004993848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003490359,0.000132325,0.0027659698,0.001361904,0.000032681033,0.00062377634,0.21898982,0.0007379144,0.00076032436,0.5600868,0.2143886,0.00008503031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015765069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012142622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026547194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010516812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098045515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14039665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382394176","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.15667","title":"The Conflation of the Justification Framework for Infringement of Aboriginal Rights with the Oakes Test in Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Conflation; Indigenous; Test (biology); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04871593263422157,"score_gpt":0.3712439027538741,"score_spread":0.3225279701196525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382394176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13433142,0.0039944854,0.026026502,0.15703611,0.0019372685,0.00027121702,0.0003220748,0.00012807,0.6759528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93997186,0.00084818725,0.006662239,0.023003882,0.0003019509,0.00015186895,0.000070297436,0.000041705498,0.028948033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97056615,0.0075094895,0.0012671272,0.0020307135,0.014789043,0.0038373892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765545,0.012664107,0.0014275205,0.001372951,0.0067592515,0.0012217616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014551215,0.0003259929,0.00094096403,0.0025246523,0.010929702,0.013093582,0.0028824196,0.007836902,0.0023000971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036881268,0.00055721606,0.00054338935,0.0020959228,0.03448648,0.0042282855,0.0042943796,0.01385343,0.00026556203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015802423,0.000009635096,0.00064788054,0.000026849415,0.000006620021,0.00025759556,0.0023410886,0.00017826162,0.00013414663,0.98595494,0.0053107073,0.0051164227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015322193,0.00010070077,0.013142351,0.0007919935,0.000102750186,0.0006344504,0.010416562,0.004838477,0.002217904,0.7399211,0.22725773,0.0004228189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71458775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78173417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28541225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043292604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06086482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5741862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382584538","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.16001","title":"Are Delayed Complaints of Sexual Harassment Not Worthy of Human Rights Protection?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Sexual misconduct; Human rights; Complaint; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Criminology; Law; Misconduct; Legislature; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.15138902949215854,"score_gpt":0.4154950946278157,"score_spread":0.26410606513565715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382584538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.702725,0.008055782,0.0007592136,0.20891123,0.000783212,0.00006462929,0.00019935855,0.000029636978,0.07847199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880127,0.0023380634,0.00013790162,0.0057214014,0.00034939204,0.00001558737,0.000042383395,0.0000062732306,0.0033763356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953146,0.0013459779,0.00032794,0.00035835797,0.0012073405,0.0014457253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97635204,0.006669285,0.010125456,0.0013340763,0.0037552118,0.0017639038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004742077,0.00013909044,0.00031358955,0.0005997525,0.0026407386,0.005292877,0.0015452456,0.003932612,0.003191929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039106224,0.00027119418,0.00021786803,0.0013984292,0.017392492,0.00446799,0.0014647061,0.002198624,0.000476711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044114873,0.00030912418,0.4271673,0.001030517,0.00005668861,0.005256356,0.22865304,0.00016712815,0.0020630136,0.15411712,0.035829715,0.14490889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007132809,0.00025688362,0.48119435,0.0010946689,0.00005244658,0.0030250049,0.37478605,0.00016006848,0.00057762343,0.019302238,0.119377464,0.000101836966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29862067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4277243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29862067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0122438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020947928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.593765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382585266","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.14880","title":"Deductibility of Surrogacy Payments in Canadian Tax Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Tax credit; Tax deduction; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Business; Tax reform; Direct tax; Public economics; Income tax; Deductible; Ad valorem tax; State income tax; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Actuarial science; Gross income","score_opus":0.06932076726047351,"score_gpt":0.3876628382342725,"score_spread":0.31834207097379896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382585266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12440167,0.005243787,0.004280746,0.087725446,0.0009954893,0.00037049683,0.00065739965,0.00011823508,0.77620685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84792143,0.004762703,0.0071012843,0.022219317,0.00026476613,0.00009027736,0.00032003815,0.000050172508,0.11727013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98834085,0.00090309995,0.0004457824,0.0007407827,0.0069695637,0.0025999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98887384,0.0036507049,0.0006340193,0.00060467055,0.005361457,0.0008753698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067218747,0.00027562946,0.00030418957,0.002328684,0.0206672,0.007807392,0.002043108,0.0046636285,0.0059241485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018553117,0.00060663343,0.0005300448,0.002373254,0.009390164,0.0021094892,0.0028511973,0.0055680526,0.00037166965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021105836,0.000029461038,0.004578983,0.000048521466,0.0000072939265,0.00051733776,0.005852178,0.0005264811,0.00036612846,0.9360147,0.033054654,0.018983105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085609594,0.000053527714,0.027373755,0.0006927374,0.0000852043,0.00063704496,0.006660476,0.004508756,0.0013303355,0.077715896,0.8805717,0.00028494134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98093694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10888974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10888974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21797241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7900541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391715129","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i1.15466","title":"A New Dawn for Canadian Platform Workers?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.05447726920712882,"score_gpt":0.3346798003244818,"score_spread":0.280202531117353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391715129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0280643,0.0093364585,0.0029825168,0.51787794,0.004567215,0.00009360561,0.00085674855,0.00024110639,0.43598008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46589577,0.011707765,0.0065935077,0.1121236,0.0009219515,0.00011891573,0.0006274273,0.0002885542,0.40172252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423015,0.0005055602,0.000074399926,0.00052361464,0.0024478168,0.0022184353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946585,0.00033042367,0.00013853508,0.00023394421,0.0021758936,0.0024626846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035191502,0.0005934711,0.0003484267,0.0015938552,0.03696321,0.015290414,0.0020568303,0.006007191,0.030056585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061860476,0.00038473267,0.0006066444,0.0027479657,0.0131780505,0.0063536135,0.0051193726,0.0055251606,0.0031290802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008990091,0.000036408153,0.0040951576,0.00017013078,0.000010776154,0.0003726964,0.020613182,0.00015165203,0.0007544696,0.46533403,0.44379643,0.06457521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010004979,0.000013266989,0.0038190354,0.00018037039,0.0000074268764,0.00007223308,0.018662427,0.00010954394,0.00016779597,0.012158091,0.96474653,0.000053304324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98714894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09823616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09823616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24065462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7127565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391715141","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i1.16782","title":"To Affirm Difference or To Deny Distinction?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15258623077202263,"score_gpt":0.46546570837745854,"score_spread":0.3128794776054359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391715141","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011135487,0.02138512,0.029920338,0.7364399,0.008522402,0.000051724797,0.00014752307,0.000142163,0.19225535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69468766,0.013922488,0.03213606,0.2175573,0.01067887,0.00035136842,0.00023967463,0.00035273226,0.03007389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98147905,0.009372039,0.0007579393,0.0030473191,0.0039893775,0.0013542937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804975,0.011543897,0.0012521559,0.0034576233,0.002323294,0.00092550734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024571132,0.0006723791,0.0017531945,0.0024441192,0.00537959,0.012989111,0.0030435375,0.007988497,0.009443005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04363725,0.00038225108,0.0009988258,0.0015199244,0.06505973,0.034952406,0.008896466,0.016834738,0.0021760408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007349416,0.000006809517,0.00013381346,0.000034091616,0.000005539494,0.000010636706,0.0007132843,0.000020995303,0.00003613613,0.98885113,0.0043342914,0.005845878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127350995,0.000010767654,0.00016410157,0.00012477809,0.000009949947,0.00002404584,0.0014423638,0.00011431973,0.00012090079,0.95444703,0.043518033,0.00001100121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004864097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044338554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024571132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047142217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054340977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12994611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401074789","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i2.16977","title":"Court, Judges and the Pandemic: Computational Legal Insights from the Ontario Court of Appeal Corpus 2008-2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Court of record; Political science; Law of the case; Scrutiny; High Court; Aside; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.038990600245859555,"score_gpt":0.3059061628279254,"score_spread":0.26691556258206584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401074789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79309833,0.004644659,0.0049163876,0.015162301,0.00023159815,0.00014840755,0.13929561,0.00045152733,0.042051133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83612835,0.0015045837,0.011081163,0.00055576826,0.00010508531,0.00017795924,0.13986202,0.00020493162,0.0103801675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920136,0.00026254464,0.000047729518,0.00014767518,0.00023339804,0.000107332846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99203616,0.005491738,0.0005898972,0.0006591223,0.00092694606,0.00029617513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012642624,0.00023887376,0.00033487985,0.0026780574,0.0024153544,0.0024211535,0.0012088018,0.0009704243,0.00481911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012147432,0.00025198268,0.00036999892,0.0067357444,0.0021527777,0.0015592818,0.0015998975,0.0011267425,0.0010333454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048375194,0.00031929484,0.28827986,0.0011480926,0.00021407423,0.0026593788,0.04206855,0.02165901,0.0018989508,0.07927689,0.4429005,0.1190917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001022187,0.0000344957,0.33617207,0.0004719219,0.00007525937,0.00050536846,0.034486216,0.059587363,0.00079385453,0.022312755,0.54532874,0.00012962594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87087035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9584343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12912965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01389866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007454629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25978017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401074888","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i2.19587","title":"The Importance of Historical Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; History; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05234838141283982,"score_gpt":0.2819594361468422,"score_spread":0.2296110547340024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401074888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022424405,0.064187504,0.008411497,0.20112994,0.0066534355,0.000024746007,0.00013649676,0.00003871663,0.69699323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89345264,0.033354383,0.002809095,0.028150426,0.009038247,0.000067521774,0.00010028586,0.00013567628,0.032891747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945416,0.0036637955,0.00013091914,0.0006647684,0.00060608605,0.00039288573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760473,0.017386917,0.0011248626,0.0016487518,0.0022685106,0.0015235655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010231904,0.00041559638,0.00050795096,0.0034876196,0.0074397307,0.012453253,0.0015182629,0.0035740563,0.009960282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018422857,0.00030047653,0.00020791007,0.0027340748,0.03067495,0.01742618,0.003339082,0.008374701,0.00085949124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010546651,0.000009597232,0.0003929491,0.000038755155,0.000004491308,0.000051299223,0.007867512,0.000027260587,0.000026766662,0.98059595,0.005409026,0.005565823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017708355,0.000024871651,0.0023213094,0.0009904995,0.000023332466,0.00025121012,0.029270258,0.00020845544,0.00019997584,0.5645508,0.40212178,0.000019681345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066345227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013821487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012453253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050752554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038351552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054112077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408694000","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v16i1.17012","title":"Gendered Credibility on Trial","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09285045392967897,"score_gpt":0.41472659513027543,"score_spread":0.3218761412005965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408694000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029767664,0.012675231,0.014787923,0.09283082,0.0020972013,0.00006657126,0.00017437304,0.0000763351,0.84752387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441543,0.0025092766,0.0016257012,0.010665987,0.0013464612,0.000060120976,0.000045359026,0.000091405025,0.039501302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96061337,0.017057337,0.0014900285,0.005108916,0.011773755,0.0039565368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337212,0.047293272,0.003071145,0.006847516,0.0072908048,0.0017761468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035252664,0.00030349637,0.0006674019,0.0022924512,0.008147758,0.013728103,0.002162723,0.009632247,0.011588412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10920166,0.00034092937,0.0004874093,0.0019793569,0.03564621,0.010651777,0.00672326,0.009051114,0.0015956295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015218767,0.00000273693,0.00038607005,0.000021111538,0.0000029949786,0.000107261316,0.004744748,0.000076428456,0.000046477227,0.98327214,0.0041970904,0.0071278033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020485162,0.000029413291,0.0011504239,0.00060332107,0.00002108078,0.0002542232,0.0049727233,0.00060085946,0.00051978533,0.71820915,0.27358288,0.000035746933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026100188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02046713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035252664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017871473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015127283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18643612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408694008","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v16i1.22166","title":"Taking Proportionality Seriously: A Countercultural Approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0479502822394703,"score_gpt":0.40109034635655894,"score_spread":0.35314006411708865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408694008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04758873,0.008578696,0.030442426,0.1656834,0.0033947155,0.000093891416,0.000036343194,0.00006746692,0.7441143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94905275,0.0027769245,0.00788793,0.022146335,0.0009621927,0.00015429624,0.000016556038,0.0001275724,0.016875489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727137,0.018147318,0.00072977104,0.0018142904,0.004947945,0.0016469563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98693395,0.006245548,0.0011148407,0.002058591,0.0030546037,0.0005924342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01677667,0.0009937884,0.00055412727,0.0031751012,0.013864966,0.014317603,0.0023691312,0.0048334817,0.0038259863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02788157,0.00052948477,0.0007233253,0.0018865357,0.07334886,0.014265442,0.011933651,0.012124137,0.00055097206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005090249,0.000008885945,0.00022746382,0.000020753552,0.000005200203,0.0000856988,0.013157744,0.00005937269,0.00008413972,0.98295605,0.0010929728,0.002296623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024657062,0.000028838378,0.0007528245,0.00031216908,0.000027862172,0.00025629433,0.020474482,0.00091291184,0.000805406,0.7394168,0.23694341,0.000044256372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025215214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020588532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025215214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017435964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009290585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1265074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}