{"meta":{"query_hash":"7cf1fcd37a52","filters":{"venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":39,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":39,"exported":39,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7cf1fcd37a52","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Western+Journal+of+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W2342917094","doi":"","title":"To Govern is to Choose: A Critique of Ontario’s New Plan to Publicly Fund In Vitro Fertilization","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Business; Political science; Population; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.10011339574227526,"score_gpt":0.3786338556523023,"score_spread":0.27852045991002705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342917094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8920963,0.0008734385,0.0007278851,0.10556316,0.00023160863,0.00031613442,0.0000061897854,0.000014121909,0.00017121276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917685,0.00008896866,0.0016252972,0.0024404058,0.0001766995,0.000009108106,2.102197e-7,0.0000121320745,0.0038786856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859864,0.000023384124,0.0005696691,0.00021087466,0.00033689424,0.00026056202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988635,0.000046908102,0.00016796798,0.0002149673,0.0004504789,0.00025616755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003386377,0.0001336749,0.00052637514,0.00032709964,0.000028710203,0.000016094165,0.00014225885,0.00005112565,0.00001542401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012672031,0.000083351624,0.00005923652,0.00028099134,0.000030316462,0.00022377557,0.00011032246,0.00016256636,0.000015902087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059096944,0.00023435983,0.836923,0.00022104365,0.00020971979,0.00014987694,0.013868289,0.0000050410968,0.044859353,0.0001802522,0.026206657,0.07123273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016492907,0.0023504442,0.8020312,0.0010883888,0.000035789086,0.000120735334,0.0011960227,5.8354548e-8,0.06797499,0.00028466596,0.12313066,0.00013772413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004858148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018832806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10312275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062355853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004180864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908018640","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6837","title":"Two Myths of Administrative Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Supreme court; Law; Administrative law; Judicial review; Deference; Political science; Duty; Legislature; Judicial deference; Standard of review; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Computer science","score_opus":0.15059853832563846,"score_gpt":0.45761073179224954,"score_spread":0.30701219346661107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908018640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90530217,0.0035228168,0.000010849669,0.0049886922,0.0007606178,0.00008585428,0.0000023198647,0.000005819326,0.08532084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689233,0.00036074256,0.00012910394,0.00015001863,0.00026832128,5.1088386e-7,4.4276472e-8,0.0000036884041,0.002195244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988861,0.00011050986,0.00034222496,0.00007378619,0.00043080715,0.00015659168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988693,0.00025488113,0.0003529023,0.00006773613,0.00038912077,0.00006608529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065639935,0.00007526765,0.00031583835,0.000029134704,0.00013361045,0.000036488032,0.00021551839,0.000022350749,0.00004320665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000125081,0.000056402296,0.000110408,0.00007908237,0.00039927318,0.00045406318,0.000041566924,0.00012577896,0.000025588812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006559477,0.00031450717,0.1495809,0.00026139052,0.00092169666,0.00030910352,0.17673166,0.000048843674,0.0021341771,0.66182464,0.0034187196,0.0037983977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013804602,0.0023117946,0.010336219,0.0011091719,0.00023459907,0.00009906481,0.27104324,7.273635e-7,0.0038317135,0.0036280707,0.7056503,0.00037458885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050022284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032564048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70223165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046219993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012523762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2300019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911311379","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6639","title":"The Misinformed Versus the Misunderstood","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Criminology; Parliament; Legislation; Restorative justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Sociology; Law; Public relations; Politics","score_opus":0.06623094173498524,"score_gpt":0.3590494476335482,"score_spread":0.29281850589856295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911311379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93870515,0.016494958,0.000005182172,0.010628036,0.0055027455,0.00012086807,9.4716466e-7,0.000008374946,0.028533725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99291104,0.00053793937,0.000004782689,0.00040034254,0.000497172,0.0000016241013,9.1965845e-8,0.000009544901,0.005637452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904275,0.000066769084,0.00033716465,0.00007799032,0.00024965132,0.00022566499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985641,0.0007786756,0.00026885798,0.00023383508,0.000118016054,0.000036467667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040422863,0.00011277667,0.00021600434,0.000027542408,0.00025197017,0.00007682398,0.00036484888,0.000030329094,0.0000802907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046340407,0.000049009428,0.00016321443,0.000073293435,0.00014939251,0.0001253029,0.00005030007,0.00030312804,0.0003855665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017633062,0.000808435,0.19921954,0.00011806363,0.034572527,0.00081498455,0.20721136,0.00010742677,0.00017323553,0.07006009,0.29685834,0.17242296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053356504,0.0010236998,0.1202358,0.00007927985,0.00018240689,0.00036813313,0.045170635,5.260521e-7,0.0000508797,0.00028409634,0.82710814,0.00016072848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013388155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017643343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53024983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034798813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027070368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49558058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913556084","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6838","title":"Whistleblowing in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Language change; Scope (computer science); Private sector; Public sector; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0530688293364164,"score_gpt":0.38527286743457756,"score_spread":0.3322040380981612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913556084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305238,0.00089566305,0.0000024768449,0.043971635,0.0021006204,0.00004781992,4.975713e-7,0.00000231259,0.022455174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957601,0.0001588323,0.000056223096,0.000890325,0.00020317745,6.6402237e-7,8.2970445e-8,0.0000028602765,0.002927757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991372,0.00009614129,0.00028382524,0.00004710103,0.00030777557,0.00012795463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919456,0.00024301649,0.00020232046,0.000045385197,0.00027449214,0.000040247214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006497725,0.0000437259,0.00014534235,0.00006948389,0.00010060247,0.000056178065,0.00012808511,0.0000132314935,0.000103294245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000476074,0.000037378715,0.000024127192,0.00025259715,0.00003103965,0.0007378723,0.000014376957,0.00024929328,0.000016538886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001837342,0.00003581519,0.94787645,0.000013917072,0.00007880816,0.00003622401,0.032840215,0.000065793974,0.00004605316,0.00675832,0.009704145,0.002525894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020925485,0.000020890317,0.06387351,0.000059915543,0.000007712293,0.000007772249,0.06344938,6.3380355e-7,0.000014199816,0.0001149243,0.8721777,0.00006409114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79624265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97845644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8840029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062726415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034554286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6129782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914188791","doi":"","title":"“Pernicious [E]ffects”: Discretionary Decision-making in Queer Immigration to Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Immigration; Discretion; Political science; Immigration law; Refugee; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.01603359941016935,"score_gpt":0.35233080570206887,"score_spread":0.3362972062918995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914188791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915415,0.0011838773,0.0021251673,0.0031289582,0.0011619388,0.00013371727,0.0000026686803,0.000006902791,0.00071524834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726,0.00027564666,0.00033829224,0.00058068585,0.001076443,0.000004170967,5.3761465e-7,0.000006758087,0.00045749164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984133,0.000170484,0.00046987,0.00012096576,0.0006249843,0.00020034492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987316,0.00025942444,0.00022249983,0.0000736058,0.00063466723,0.00007821614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007855739,0.000105275816,0.00023112995,0.00014090474,0.00037579413,0.00007992493,0.0001790003,0.00004180193,0.000031333548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008849075,0.00007975549,0.000053412943,0.00026336682,0.000105236766,0.0004285283,0.000028749995,0.00013382875,0.000008805598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006022524,0.00015901643,0.53992325,0.00003091886,0.00024109642,0.00014594251,0.32356566,0.0004338514,0.0006706122,0.007057458,0.05147125,0.0756987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074095454,0.0012461244,0.43657234,0.0016542061,0.00006267843,0.00005214276,0.10751636,0.00007824714,0.00034930528,0.002957064,0.448213,0.0005575462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20995349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99471563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78476214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055933517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005379971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7953075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914230872","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6826","title":"Good Intentions, Questionable Results","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Meaning (existential); Falling (accident); Child abuse; Occupational safety and health; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Environmental health; Law","score_opus":0.1001926285212023,"score_gpt":0.474419664970941,"score_spread":0.3742270364497387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914230872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8915369,0.004200433,0.00007030651,0.0725371,0.004172078,0.0003380309,0.000008969193,0.000030455627,0.027105706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96716213,0.0008508279,0.00032898528,0.0010599449,0.00085711974,0.0000063952875,0.0000012176013,0.000009652069,0.029723702],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758756,0.00049196865,0.0010009448,0.0001251902,0.0005262935,0.00026802087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965861,0.0014967796,0.00072555087,0.00018105388,0.0008907409,0.00011979844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002548889,0.000106560474,0.0004238035,0.00008100259,0.00022175051,0.000013496841,0.00017521913,0.0000793977,0.00021548897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042323405,0.00007098948,0.00009740083,0.0001062548,0.00007009914,0.00049002405,0.00011470406,0.0008292524,0.00070381525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012067051,0.0004061291,0.88509125,0.0010271155,0.0007656517,0.00011823383,0.011935118,0.00002193854,0.0004334436,0.014446206,0.08277893,0.0017693115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015791896,0.0005351756,0.056160826,0.0012795464,0.000072695,0.00002736616,0.020435963,0.0000021692738,0.000025066534,0.0007554921,0.9190285,0.00009798718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008103504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010397923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8362496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011272049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022165859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9046356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949654254","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8075","title":"School Nurses: An Indispensable Resource for Health Promotion in Ontario's Children and Adolescents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"School Health and Nursing Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health promotion; Nursing; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Promotion (chess); School nursing; Scope (computer science); Plan (archaeology); Medicine; Public health; Resource (disambiguation); Public relations; Medical education; Psychology; Business; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07444671801681947,"score_gpt":0.45641686414439364,"score_spread":0.3819701461275742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949654254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889914,0.0011994006,0.000009209891,0.0070218355,0.0014932316,0.0012189868,0.000004246798,0.000009569843,0.000052159496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959407,0.00013188942,0.00039539754,0.001418499,0.00044002567,0.00002176684,0.000007315238,0.00001825143,0.001626188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806,0.0003249859,0.0007918654,0.0001851558,0.00021717882,0.00042084846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985678,0.000081291066,0.0006821689,0.00013283743,0.00026199734,0.00027385965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014811804,0.00012804037,0.0004353199,0.00018596258,0.0003278921,0.000020005471,0.00011571212,0.00008066278,0.000019465155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018530378,0.000103512386,0.00003605124,0.000090497975,0.000028629582,0.0004553337,0.00002632545,0.0007461025,0.000015759544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004581467,0.00017583372,0.98208225,0.00027005613,0.000021707716,5.726822e-7,0.01004858,0.00000300452,0.000005137158,0.000011660955,0.0051252884,0.0017977469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002319597,0.0015249063,0.9803059,0.0033545594,0.000013804726,0.00001915029,0.005538421,0.0000017581339,0.0000023031791,0.00011116889,0.0067218724,0.00008653332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057590045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058812357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053053353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000881333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009896375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95836186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950072084","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8070","title":"Dancing in the Dark: An Analysis of the Live Entertainment Industry and the Deceptive Market Practices of Ticketmaster and Live Nation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Entertainment; Ticket; Legislation; Business; Entertainment industry; Advertising; Marketing; Unfair competition; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05865512794272326,"score_gpt":0.3462002751063588,"score_spread":0.28754514716363555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950072084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99002284,0.0011785025,9.63052e-7,0.007866697,0.000094689676,0.00017786906,0.0000020397174,5.691943e-7,0.00065582944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983714,0.00062844495,0.000012817063,0.00014473672,0.00004787257,0.000002121193,1.2941938e-7,0.0000015134378,0.0007909172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851406,0.00056346535,0.00033586464,0.00007821057,0.00041133634,0.000097063275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810916,0.000649767,0.0009546001,0.00007022406,0.00019513424,0.000021128371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002098431,0.00007272407,0.0002673489,0.000051792696,0.00016378389,0.00006893728,0.00019385279,0.000047592574,0.000030091152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003375881,0.000030189067,0.000057796624,0.0002085944,0.0004004532,0.00035480462,0.00009683504,0.00026127498,1.4845101e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012782072,0.000031466458,0.7234022,0.00000954719,0.000669173,0.0000017059914,0.27430898,0.00001958158,0.00001805088,0.00013141346,0.00028711313,0.0009929549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003551328,0.00008218501,0.50760293,0.000103812294,0.0002947571,0.0000038037504,0.48961657,0.000017110062,0.000020165042,0.00004684763,0.0018191884,0.00003751428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014977279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010048564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21579929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006156606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005547782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56073344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951586099","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8073","title":"Gender Diversity in the Boardroom: Raising Questions About the \"Comply or Explain\" Model and Targets in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Argument (complex analysis); Diversity (politics); Accounting; Representation (politics); Gender diversity; Corporate title; Order (exchange); Chief executive officer; Raising (metalworking); Public relations; Business case; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Management; Law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.25040250078901255,"score_gpt":0.34490009174044417,"score_spread":0.09449759095143162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951586099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904835,0.0015811389,0.000053721764,0.006265561,0.00025328423,0.00011072606,0.0000049874347,0.0000018694807,0.001245201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984399,0.0006032868,0.000026806245,0.0007302757,0.00005221861,4.9161815e-7,9.490028e-8,0.0000016353337,0.00014529003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986849,0.00037457544,0.00020886264,0.0000861077,0.00044336752,0.00020221264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939793,0.0002584214,0.00013355065,0.00007136387,0.00009861491,0.000040129184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014948145,0.00007413787,0.00019231948,0.00004009123,0.0006833229,0.000056964756,0.0003216083,0.000021833426,0.000008415546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011270921,0.000041366795,0.00003549395,0.00012263893,0.00013363134,0.00036870697,0.0001975676,0.00025275556,0.0000011227652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004567417,0.000024522726,0.79033136,0.0000148207855,0.000050184924,0.000046545978,0.20594658,0.0013358518,0.0000027999718,0.0012046988,0.00082604325,0.00017090277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047578788,0.00003290783,0.7166356,0.00005478194,0.00002492569,0.000010158595,0.2780113,0.00007455355,0.0000012553403,0.0011263525,0.0034566487,0.00009574523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55005854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9590744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40901586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029581637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049905106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52556366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952048328","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8076","title":"A Wall Between the \"Public\" and the \"Private\": A Comment on Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v Wall","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Judicial opinion; Charter; State (computer science); Prima facie; Judicial discretion; Accountability; Judicial activism; Politics","score_opus":0.045239658811208436,"score_gpt":0.3119905186116866,"score_spread":0.26675085980047814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952048328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7482525,0.0038766302,0.000017584314,0.24413124,0.00048690455,0.00030150698,0.000005247399,0.000008875062,0.002919506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951087,0.0018491606,0.00001018243,0.002432621,0.0005122027,0.000006485259,4.8102083e-7,0.0000054128345,0.00007472835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796116,0.00041384122,0.00052147434,0.000115451316,0.00075896305,0.00022908606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731684,0.0014077073,0.00059086486,0.00011239558,0.0005171765,0.000055035885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016885642,0.00015026928,0.0005490415,0.000059405214,0.0009065021,0.000099743316,0.00038779533,0.000045475623,0.000010062106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035354172,0.000075012635,0.00013546308,0.00019362672,0.0022386543,0.00025179193,0.00015848583,0.00026062055,0.000008521929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004111884,0.00012441892,0.4048583,0.000028746268,0.0015240358,0.000008700599,0.021603879,0.000010849166,0.000012459773,0.56510997,0.0034793462,0.0028280795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005180896,0.0009822377,0.1987284,0.0005748112,0.0004994642,0.000018091137,0.028213644,0.000003146626,0.000113685855,0.04390755,0.7214294,0.0003486526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017671692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015373862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71795005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009119459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012706805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82484144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952395119","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8072","title":"Direct Discrimination and Indirect Discrimination: A Distinction with a Difference","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Liability; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.06030698181602328,"score_gpt":0.34564452272424473,"score_spread":0.28533754090822144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952395119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97032136,0.00043834688,0.00032852383,0.0035731168,0.00043299387,0.00015266046,0.0000027388096,0.000021658021,0.02472859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483776,0.00036876008,0.000103186496,0.00008539246,0.00016059428,0.000004640594,0.0000010687198,0.000007832851,0.0044307522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986094,0.00021462502,0.0002943172,0.00014255018,0.00056513364,0.0001739288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989544,0.00018522698,0.0003365447,0.000070905946,0.00036618047,0.000086721615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006942993,0.000120608034,0.00030247806,0.00010959293,0.00029427666,0.0001708059,0.00012206055,0.000035629022,0.00001775738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020777129,0.00008248756,0.00004999463,0.00015843018,0.00029370308,0.0007159106,0.00003972722,0.0001177057,0.0000062798867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045427794,0.0003466696,0.61110824,0.00033945712,0.0004700648,0.00004945658,0.23404764,0.000010031817,0.00029666215,0.089371,0.00024785873,0.06325863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012478902,0.0009006485,0.9189566,0.0006587601,0.00023959453,0.000038876256,0.056005172,0.0000074078725,0.00023915787,0.0017533508,0.019602578,0.00034997638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018755697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035977873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30784833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011414644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006579386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33637452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952879402","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8069","title":"Assessing the Damage: Money Awards by the OHRT in Sexual Harassment Cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Damages; Entitlement (fair division); Psychology; Tribunal; Criminology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.10727226551777226,"score_gpt":0.44547524043829306,"score_spread":0.3382029749205208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952879402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594457,0.0049898103,0.000010643814,0.033661675,0.00061671034,0.000112658854,0.0000015088474,0.000005094422,0.0011561862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968702,0.00044294167,0.000014587997,0.00045840058,0.0003206251,0.00000262702,1.11802876e-7,0.0000055767478,0.0018848852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982892,0.0003710916,0.00034256224,0.000104601764,0.00063899095,0.00025352978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986312,0.00077998935,0.00025802388,0.000119089826,0.00016337438,0.00004832229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022265206,0.0001041074,0.00024067456,0.000029811681,0.0005097121,0.00037673826,0.00043020872,0.000028770688,0.00001808111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031950112,0.00005217804,0.00006328208,0.0001397736,0.00033220084,0.0008284821,0.0001028396,0.0003218109,0.000014471018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009269575,0.0001867552,0.8558108,0.000065878936,0.00031782387,0.00042478266,0.08452632,0.00020189813,0.00070237747,0.0015436424,0.03612671,0.02000027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045820486,0.0003698279,0.16992947,0.00033304002,0.00010986066,0.00012746408,0.39776126,0.000010079131,0.000116333926,0.00019457763,0.43036896,0.00022091217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033204153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006713964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6858814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015158152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001549087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50194967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015260480","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i1.10229","title":"The Evolution of the Duty to Consult","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Duty; Supreme court; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Subject (documents); Law; Indigenous; Work (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Process (computing); Abandonment (legal); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04893452292364313,"score_gpt":0.3429191904893343,"score_spread":0.29398466756569114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015260480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84110504,0.00445254,0.0001526722,0.1493503,0.0010547317,0.00013479251,0.0000024386877,0.0000074111053,0.0037400569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982128,0.00042401475,0.000012836405,0.00035390636,0.00049617834,8.1637376e-7,8.520174e-9,0.0000023737148,0.00049704337],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999067,0.00013053439,0.00026456575,0.00004693959,0.00038274963,0.00010821016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991034,0.00015664258,0.00024720276,0.000053991014,0.0003763394,0.00006242008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005766969,0.000046884357,0.000134734,0.00001240772,0.0005489191,0.00004130679,0.00024437762,0.000017924078,0.0000037551533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060933764,0.000023628767,0.00009189417,0.00018181615,0.00025398523,0.00011246382,0.000069133916,0.00011151786,0.000003893099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007283814,0.00012648365,0.40626597,0.00006062098,0.0010739365,0.000023036264,0.44044268,0.00026028298,0.0033697917,0.0754204,0.032354854,0.039873574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022784299,0.00019480819,0.07494232,0.000060101185,0.000044708584,0.000004032805,0.031723436,0.0000019964966,0.00017109879,0.0002480551,0.89233166,0.000049931878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035895576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018724411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8599768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008782089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012837628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42218974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015269964","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i1.8102","title":"That Most Canadian of Virtues","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"JDSU (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Charter; Political science; CLARITY; Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Sociology; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07866970055343833,"score_gpt":0.34252095830733287,"score_spread":0.2638512577538945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015269964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92545354,0.0017735123,0.00008722856,0.052374605,0.0007466899,0.00006630415,0.000014729506,0.0000070272977,0.019476341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779946,0.00034029275,0.000054134773,0.0008043825,0.0004894625,2.8213498e-7,2.960787e-7,0.000002937745,0.0005087285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999291,0.000051403338,0.00019096822,0.000041810556,0.00032556613,0.00009923795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992706,0.000055390377,0.00020221707,0.000019526442,0.00034108447,0.0001111688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024125769,0.00004458562,0.00014553263,0.000041843436,0.00013956965,0.000029724088,0.00014972144,0.000020308129,0.000023566856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020994553,0.0000360386,0.000053176125,0.00007641666,0.000101182566,0.0002770093,0.000014450181,0.000074567615,0.000006785865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013194382,0.00006339124,0.65833676,0.000061018352,0.00085990294,0.00020882663,0.13021092,0.00013356755,0.0005990226,0.18830565,0.012418842,0.008670174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046671877,0.00034639708,0.057446007,0.00016236259,0.000055811728,0.000009514397,0.023776067,0.000005143793,0.001630712,0.0013897691,0.9145456,0.0001658934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03743844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22854134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007904412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022027837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9689713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015362568","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i1.8544","title":"Immigration Detention and Habeas Corpus","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Law; Statute; Supreme court; Immigration detention; Political science; Immigration; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.09933778993472461,"score_gpt":0.3638551638361494,"score_spread":0.2645173739014248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015362568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91827726,0.016444607,0.00049359933,0.062302407,0.00096905854,0.0000876426,0.0000016562744,0.000021309877,0.0014024652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953682,0.0024724174,0.00008486454,0.0007450884,0.00086564646,4.9355344e-7,1.5007848e-7,0.0000038234225,0.00045931456],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919504,0.00011273642,0.00022299986,0.00007083256,0.0002931664,0.000105206374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939984,0.0000823914,0.00021484571,0.000023967137,0.00018063407,0.00009831452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045482017,0.000059979626,0.00017014031,0.000020186324,0.00028803066,0.000084931286,0.00007606258,0.00004210709,0.000004601279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026155196,0.000047328278,0.000055987315,0.00005984642,0.00023163435,0.00037026152,0.000022698216,0.00017019316,0.0000034172438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036723423,0.000108893655,0.44224602,0.00017084832,0.0007612361,0.00024122912,0.454844,0.000024051169,0.0018350297,0.04690119,0.006775575,0.04572468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085772446,0.0006970091,0.081470646,0.00014742382,0.00015823472,0.00003131283,0.040783767,0.000008049019,0.00025345766,0.00262759,0.8727318,0.00023297958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001586581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032793565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86595625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027773734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005271411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2215328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3058353719","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9445","title":"Rethinking Post-Rana Plaza Transnational Labour Governance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Empowerment; Factory (object-oriented programming); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Labour law; Human rights; Global governance; Work (physics); Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Management; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0654914267263827,"score_gpt":0.3402990713303387,"score_spread":0.274807644603956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3058353719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70323455,0.0022839939,0.00020424483,0.2839567,0.0011175219,0.00009022028,0.000045292123,0.000028193323,0.009039262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922079,0.00042518074,0.00023517346,0.0045985053,0.0011176063,0.0000010398712,7.8277554e-7,0.00000863178,0.0014051747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827456,0.00010382313,0.00037926398,0.00010685879,0.0009476049,0.00018786661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985907,0.00016270274,0.00029172093,0.0000342989,0.00081235263,0.00010822245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005092797,0.000100656864,0.00023479236,0.000027055044,0.0003198081,0.00009363948,0.00033109906,0.000039911873,0.00010039819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036562205,0.000084026244,0.00012649495,0.00013947509,0.00016448338,0.0006444329,0.00002974102,0.00023458789,0.0000108989025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020048446,0.000043607797,0.0108661065,0.00002761244,0.00036066043,0.00013667239,0.062257253,0.0001046653,0.00030524677,0.92305374,0.0021287526,0.00051518466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010401211,0.00037841895,0.034109958,0.000114978306,0.00006366261,0.00002353748,0.005290346,0.000006222891,0.0003411783,0.00603118,0.9523501,0.00025032886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001602281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014889699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9502213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011988259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016418003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34264907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3061143068","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9461","title":"Retreating to Justiciability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Subjectivity; Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Moral agency; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12165769100275119,"score_gpt":0.38900445348464635,"score_spread":0.26734676248189515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3061143068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532198,0.006331656,0.0006244477,0.099578336,0.0010923819,0.00018417394,0.0000056256513,0.00004210239,0.038921498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958705,0.00034922714,0.00024037871,0.0017863456,0.0016634484,0.0000015024414,5.08265e-8,0.0000031298262,0.0000854656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988363,0.0000987841,0.00033346633,0.000102280894,0.0004397405,0.00018941976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989544,0.00019485668,0.00015580116,0.000033760112,0.00048220356,0.00017897773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051590166,0.00008299802,0.0003003417,0.000027170945,0.0005528323,0.00004389826,0.00017851139,0.00002208416,0.000012484121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021694885,0.00006414272,0.00009298947,0.00024381973,0.00031997994,0.00019860467,0.000094324554,0.00013097243,0.000031273263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041003735,0.00018381578,0.65686226,0.00010469397,0.0010631054,0.0004464701,0.21334273,0.0002766673,0.0006291363,0.0813676,0.0073847985,0.037928663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005824182,0.0008336213,0.07188899,0.00044909908,0.00028743825,0.000022685992,0.1254178,0.0000027524895,0.00022186348,0.006126706,0.7937,0.00046665515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040826784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074581685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7863152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000974601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013210892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4251995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3071865145","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i2.9478","title":"On Sexual Consent in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Spouse; Criminal code; Criminal law; Dilemma; KISS (TNC); Context (archaeology); Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Medical emergency; Computer science","score_opus":0.10991924886255602,"score_gpt":0.3537178499598585,"score_spread":0.24379860109730248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3071865145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94827706,0.002864185,0.000002469146,0.046691943,0.0005449993,0.00010485916,0.000004013005,0.000007996557,0.001502493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642646,0.0005194375,0.00002976477,0.0022678904,0.00046530747,0.0000020355988,1.0841566e-7,0.0000060245334,0.00028299287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982314,0.00020696854,0.00044132082,0.00012717587,0.0006953593,0.000297781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876744,0.00053154374,0.0002583049,0.000040285628,0.00022645123,0.00017598725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003170066,0.00013611183,0.00042999492,0.000025193598,0.00028077653,0.000041590167,0.00023175846,0.000027127311,0.00002146717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013414454,0.00009753624,0.000056035566,0.0001715719,0.00020837858,0.00018015092,0.000071163995,0.00030426445,0.000010562892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043607372,0.00013248376,0.5999963,0.00012670693,0.0009775666,0.0016224568,0.3143017,0.0009215235,0.00017103294,0.0038188694,0.072220474,0.0052748173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021439022,0.00081945956,0.14885901,0.000309723,0.000084740386,0.000017113793,0.5368238,0.000007470816,0.00011790419,0.00014173817,0.3101156,0.00055954495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7353194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98069483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4511373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010135112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084475894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39774126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208920815","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v11i1.10784","title":"Nihkitimahkinawow ekwa Nihkitimahkisin: Pity and Compassion in Cree Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pity; Compassion; Kindness; Sustenance; Indigenous; Possession (linguistics); Sociology; Meaning (existential); Duty; Law; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04249409696012688,"score_gpt":0.36800694087272834,"score_spread":0.32551284391260144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208920815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95602405,0.009370326,0.000021701973,0.004053535,0.0010436322,0.000113291586,0.000002575996,0.000009896031,0.029361004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97835666,0.018093966,0.00025269375,0.00021359406,0.0007296906,5.6916537e-7,7.2425775e-7,0.000008075199,0.002344051],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818736,0.00041453532,0.00048119377,0.00015222504,0.00042084197,0.000343817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875814,0.00022888511,0.00026265252,0.00009075126,0.00050828076,0.00015127649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010491374,0.000119283904,0.00039661414,0.00008564403,0.0023127357,0.00011860196,0.00014068163,0.0000710686,0.000023891947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021776319,0.00009088094,0.000066590335,0.00019613623,0.00042220182,0.00051628053,0.0000073136357,0.00028020557,0.0000059846507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009347123,0.00056491676,0.101748794,0.00017277164,0.00015645911,0.00061026646,0.6879532,0.000011334307,0.00002186132,0.20651998,0.0007538619,0.001393088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076304824,0.00018671188,0.057888843,0.00040022595,0.00003770275,0.00014878216,0.04630778,0.0000010388586,0.00022297786,0.0033174227,0.89052504,0.00020042904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01803819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7293098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88977116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022892246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025717495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208924544","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v12i1.13620","title":"Status Quo Sorrows: The Failures of Energy Project Consultations and Reconciliatory Paths Forward","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Veto; Jurisprudence; Transparency (behavior); Status quo; Equity (law); Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Constitution; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03754162049684355,"score_gpt":0.34712959639173496,"score_spread":0.3095879758948914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208924544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546955,0.03022015,0.000039201102,0.0033368142,0.0010350817,0.00014877449,0.000014444918,0.000007735831,0.01050225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92668694,0.067955986,0.00019721266,0.00010942098,0.00046068567,0.0000019734284,8.645218e-7,0.0000064185297,0.0045804703],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985785,0.0003915308,0.0004063777,0.00008853603,0.0003051443,0.00022994522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787533,0.0004865541,0.0003893653,0.00007288501,0.0011071148,0.000068752364],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007412407,0.000078706944,0.00024495277,0.000059642578,0.0019193644,0.000050989795,0.00010271096,0.000040625324,0.0000073375804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001010622,0.000047096404,0.000066179775,0.00016173461,0.00046170168,0.00023342333,0.0000038630537,0.000119594755,7.190915e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002855609,0.00009773061,0.017649615,0.00007264088,0.000292692,0.000020293184,0.925553,0.0000049724067,0.0000127942685,0.053664982,0.0009997743,0.0016029037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002209481,0.00009968049,0.00356596,0.0000707535,0.000053283118,0.000022266599,0.15289317,2.890586e-7,0.00014683006,0.00070452935,0.842159,0.000063332074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017307086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66510653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84115916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009314988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009051578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210291968","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v12i1.13636","title":"COVID-19 Pandemic and Structural Barriers for Migrant Agricultural Workers in Ontario","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Vulnerability (computing); Legislature; Immigration; Harm; Agriculture; Migrant workers; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Political science; Development economics; Business; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.09260932131223008,"score_gpt":0.3099912550672101,"score_spread":0.21738193375498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210291968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98107535,0.014340864,0.00017655901,0.0035911761,0.00060371746,0.000124067,0.000027104625,0.0000066587872,0.00005453169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710673,0.00035470945,0.0002685281,0.0013083357,0.000112403,0.00000494847,0.0000020148075,0.000010086319,0.000832266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859303,0.000026298121,0.00079161447,0.00022818687,0.000059988673,0.0003008526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987198,0.00029859578,0.0005014555,0.000094019895,0.000089875255,0.00029621535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006049232,0.00017328339,0.00066403666,0.00015302662,0.00012660373,0.000087421235,0.00013579136,0.000069164744,0.00003811522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00172945,0.00014515317,0.00015282254,0.00013838624,0.000094542476,0.00037203153,0.00007530933,0.00030939342,0.0000021255412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089615445,0.000006683662,0.98952067,0.00005544458,0.00021666958,0.0000614225,0.008788854,0.00028604025,0.000030064255,0.00020052212,0.0006269624,0.00011707748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00276872,0.00015501473,0.90814054,0.000089874586,0.000032396274,0.00049962173,0.0060003987,0.0000155707,0.000012906403,0.0029612004,0.079061985,0.00026178325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008637443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16432407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15568663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011759344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046288094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216272443","doi":"","title":"Runaway Jurors: Independent Juror Research in the Internet Age","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Psychology; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.14504485947037277,"score_gpt":0.4386102378614654,"score_spread":0.29356537839109265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216272443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94334227,0.00407359,0.0000014961533,0.012233095,0.0007971342,0.00019704003,0.000001062266,0.0000063490124,0.03934798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98697287,0.0013503842,0.000019687748,0.00053104106,0.0005469913,0.000004181617,1.7476897e-7,0.000005720904,0.010568966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726295,0.0007780794,0.00032421033,0.00011888589,0.0011860116,0.0003298742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989872,0.00039233846,0.00015496727,0.00011691567,0.0002961607,0.000052444706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004959461,0.00008977615,0.0002444583,0.000027836608,0.0002674417,0.00019519616,0.0007411353,0.00008157907,0.000047631787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015809742,0.00005041287,0.00013274119,0.0003181577,0.00044581102,0.00037196506,0.00012171446,0.0008798998,0.000061060535],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011276886,0.00027463434,0.1171838,0.00006569836,0.00033340094,0.00074079225,0.79324573,0.000013857556,0.00011234638,0.0464071,0.039069574,0.0024402847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044584123,0.00022568744,0.029532637,0.00020219064,0.0000146612665,0.000027370716,0.22653028,1.891218e-7,0.000024595842,0.002227321,0.7406757,0.00009356533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002504075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028069555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7016061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015636123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010694472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38227755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235363811","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v11i1.10724","title":"Galambos v Perez, its Critics, and the Equity-Certainty Paradox in Fiduciary Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Fiduciary; Equity (law); Post hoc; Supreme court; Law and economics; Certainty; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Duty; Medicine","score_opus":0.09636965377138822,"score_gpt":0.4299462558601999,"score_spread":0.3335766020888117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235363811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76983654,0.04067186,0.00004894263,0.1455082,0.0005940857,0.00027404111,0.000010609783,0.00001596396,0.04303972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935521,0.0038561577,0.000056635356,0.0011116704,0.00041793426,0.0000059380422,2.0206241e-7,0.0000052188475,0.0009941508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986942,0.000281399,0.00036069518,0.000111767404,0.00033303795,0.00021893047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988794,0.0004658201,0.00014058812,0.00009303757,0.00034897443,0.00007220822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013013992,0.00008513711,0.00028859614,0.000023402614,0.0005296909,0.0001814991,0.00021710046,0.00003533006,0.000015701633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050453853,0.00005609198,0.00008503963,0.0001340297,0.0005821507,0.0002906058,0.00021910263,0.00027691864,0.0000053552885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005357791,0.00010728619,0.01188717,0.000041017705,0.00014269752,0.0001525301,0.034203112,0.00002679846,0.000060111448,0.95093954,0.00069844205,0.0016877203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043662363,0.00013544034,0.038803272,0.0005063215,0.00023531445,0.00021097482,0.119710535,0.000031884796,0.00044141174,0.05805868,0.7770185,0.00048142133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007036647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012017247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89288086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007414815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015139864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6705906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237406470","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6836","title":"Runaway Jurors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06518602737449636,"score_gpt":0.42273003252261937,"score_spread":0.357544005148123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237406470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96227294,0.00549373,0.000056524823,0.0038239507,0.002182321,0.000084234714,9.037611e-7,0.0000222676,0.026063146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98903674,0.00078081834,0.00025232334,0.00030726814,0.0004260154,5.8209906e-7,3.4318294e-8,0.000008946753,0.009187278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847484,0.00011120355,0.0003770682,0.000103577266,0.0007122832,0.00022105886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857074,0.00034683858,0.0003641628,0.000096644835,0.0005398672,0.000081726845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00105775,0.00009406929,0.00031636606,0.00010856045,0.00020532262,0.00010717562,0.00037968988,0.000039291837,0.000091824404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006008712,0.0000695103,0.00010845871,0.00021514324,0.00016978421,0.00056287483,0.000072753115,0.0001856495,0.00016250367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043733715,0.00035506857,0.6580106,0.00022355567,0.0013155941,0.0006050789,0.117877126,0.00028799675,0.000566451,0.052966136,0.04024162,0.12711342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035217704,0.00020043267,0.021486614,0.00016761533,0.00003212901,0.000029900253,0.012314076,2.095493e-7,0.00009115219,0.0016152958,0.9635801,0.00013032487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021951919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018402698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9233385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076865705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017805498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28345478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280498886","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v13i1.14339","title":"Examining Labour Rights Enforcement Mechanisms in NAFTA and the USMCA and its Impact on Labour Conditions in Mexico","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Free trade agreement; Workforce; Government (linguistics); Labour law; Political science; Economics; International trade; Free trade; Labour economics; Development economics; Law","score_opus":0.04142964493118548,"score_gpt":0.3625951705745123,"score_spread":0.3211655256433268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280498886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939331,0.00091901416,0.0000033315407,0.0028326903,0.00026721632,0.00013376691,0.000026788075,0.0000034656384,0.0018806738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978976,0.0003567039,0.0000075954513,0.0004973937,0.00007903156,0.000014556862,5.959989e-7,0.0000042886218,0.0011422086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986308,0.00033043255,0.00029397215,0.000092677794,0.00047221273,0.00017988966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934345,0.0003105954,0.00017362842,0.000034923636,0.000092786686,0.000044585246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015147327,0.00009242037,0.00022747877,0.00014036837,0.0005537551,0.000072065464,0.00014866969,0.000017018296,0.00009770258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081607155,0.000057719964,0.000034181354,0.00014362227,0.00011539461,0.00024928842,0.00010204982,0.00024086487,9.855956e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033224144,0.00006079918,0.026568267,0.0000055105747,0.00012847512,0.00008787551,0.022997085,0.00053240824,0.000036773177,0.94915605,0.00005359057,0.00004094414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016156383,0.0044653537,0.6178014,0.00066584663,0.000133197,0.0002080215,0.1156187,0.0001362215,0.0004638556,0.1533269,0.09024104,0.0007830354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020353845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065286905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7958291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021681949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052855645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42590925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280572051","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v13i1.14603","title":"Jury Strikes Back","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Economic Justice; Jury trial; Political science; Civil procedure; Pandemic; Law; Criminology; Public administration; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.12184795208378905,"score_gpt":0.4381770377505677,"score_spread":0.31632908566677864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280572051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5522223,0.008298705,0.00005362152,0.33673748,0.0080162445,0.00020505981,0.000018107994,0.000028877206,0.09441958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977203,0.0005247643,0.00020227068,0.0015829251,0.0007411965,0.000004655629,4.845037e-7,0.0000057387288,0.019734943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986673,0.00030171103,0.00032243386,0.00006327993,0.0005026193,0.0001426287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882096,0.00028163433,0.00039036237,0.00006256406,0.00038799885,0.000056494875],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012896224,0.00005746248,0.00014930883,0.000105731335,0.0009963765,0.000119243065,0.00023776584,0.000013547171,0.001021639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051408465,0.000051039377,0.00006554703,0.00038782324,0.0001314458,0.000796144,0.00007044408,0.00043941007,0.00003687111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001762556,0.0006705133,0.05724799,0.00003575699,0.0007704992,0.00009455405,0.2363481,0.00017260342,0.00022996632,0.085969,0.59417385,0.024110915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014553744,0.00009262108,0.0020590196,0.0000066671346,0.000019993262,0.000024002384,0.065088525,1.3965658e-7,0.000014361001,0.00043022196,0.932063,0.0000559216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029332566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038470104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4249807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018032125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060248753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318773428","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.15360","title":"Contract Law’s Red Herring: Exposing “Intention” as a Guise for Consideration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Political science; Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14382678537832502,"score_gpt":0.43763462453772106,"score_spread":0.293807839159396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318773428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050728,0.0016287958,0.0014366615,0.07162863,0.0014678981,0.0007582819,0.000014344012,0.00012838423,0.017864218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641806,0.00032910227,0.00031337768,0.0004017082,0.0005471557,0.000021413836,0.0000010745899,0.000008918987,0.0019591763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989711,0.00005885912,0.00039487815,0.000099776174,0.00027013276,0.0002052311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986926,0.00030026218,0.00030090517,0.00006758119,0.00056037033,0.0000783147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008927343,0.00007905871,0.00021470003,0.000056031673,0.0008314153,0.00019981003,0.00012868908,0.000035159384,0.000010621464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005882387,0.000066261266,0.00013816911,0.00012831956,0.00016397999,0.00041696764,0.000036798207,0.00010299858,0.000021314878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018867855,0.00014622092,0.00863017,0.0000550183,0.00060189626,0.00009223018,0.038667113,0.00019822495,0.004943382,0.92839104,0.01438674,0.0036992675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010297257,0.0002091461,0.004315451,0.00018185512,0.00009968476,0.00003074355,0.018669078,0.000028589406,0.0007618685,0.014876709,0.9596248,0.00017232331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005308661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002846519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009080948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63946587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816809","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.14627","title":"Wrongly Imprisoned, Released as a Pauper: Canada’s Ineffective Approach to Innocence Compensation and Avenues for Reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Compensation (psychology); Statutory law; Status quo; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Payment; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.06828437774955226,"score_gpt":0.37404854191733944,"score_spread":0.3057641641677872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318816809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848372,0.0010327741,0.0001578649,0.012313085,0.00037470527,0.0002772678,0.000007810554,0.000015201334,0.0009841291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998449,0.00037769598,0.00020168796,0.000246518,0.00028494388,0.000014367926,7.3148965e-7,0.0000066617254,0.0004183927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989341,0.000079191814,0.0002492771,0.00012537083,0.00038356901,0.00022851842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898905,0.0002709598,0.00016429854,0.000054441505,0.00040239195,0.000118891956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085954973,0.00009208266,0.00025716424,0.000069835565,0.00045203642,0.00006824212,0.00014780213,0.0000282557,5.767964e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072962634,0.00007300373,0.000040963114,0.00020370563,0.00011865319,0.00029843493,0.00005574197,0.00010530647,0.000002633876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042585745,0.00039611728,0.20249398,0.0016402554,0.0016393174,0.0005027506,0.56005484,0.0005372152,0.002503468,0.052116923,0.091352895,0.08250366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017546061,0.0021443502,0.33252728,0.00090452377,0.00024576503,0.0001151829,0.23970789,0.00008294598,0.00049299886,0.0020152358,0.41934115,0.00066806754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21631911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45559317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32798827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038084725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038810293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7888995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318830002","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.14341","title":"Indeterminate Sentences and Section 12 of the Charter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Indeterminate; Law; Punishment (psychology); Judicial review; Legislature; Political science; Section (typography); Contemplation; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Supreme court; Social psychology; Business; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10035924538342822,"score_gpt":0.4207020686485382,"score_spread":0.32034282326511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318830002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99279064,0.00093467446,0.000008179045,0.0030505706,0.0028929457,0.000047493828,0.0000027263961,0.000006800465,0.00026597286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981788,0.00029745346,0.000004921757,0.00010168028,0.00031338763,0.0000012607076,4.9352824e-8,0.000005270677,0.0010971847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910396,0.00014012314,0.0003377031,0.00008030795,0.0002055308,0.00013236256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929535,0.00018352471,0.00027760054,0.000087980305,0.000121144185,0.000034385754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000529687,0.000068423324,0.00020703518,0.00009416559,0.00009615197,0.000013513317,0.000108298416,0.00004343653,0.000007352242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096879216,0.000036244095,0.000068539535,0.00011794765,0.00013437412,0.000063967105,0.000054340297,0.0002023821,0.000007868469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035847578,0.00014758816,0.66096425,0.00023515284,0.0012653868,0.0025077453,0.08251688,0.000023428858,0.0010473718,0.00009961221,0.0060723596,0.24476175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038655938,0.0003354208,0.97003496,0.00038145616,0.000028723627,0.0016047527,0.015506503,0.0000030459478,0.00005865911,0.00032540195,0.011273837,0.000060709677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031907446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007271693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30907068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011692232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017908338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14779913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319811782","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.15144","title":"Harm Reduction in Prisons: Restraints within the Prisoners’ Rights Discourse","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Harm; Harm reduction; Political science; Mainstream; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Stakeholder; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine; Public health; Nursing","score_opus":0.06952061025016237,"score_gpt":0.398999660842085,"score_spread":0.3294790505919226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319811782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886671,0.0008292192,0.000034766617,0.008754192,0.0011907323,0.00008165623,7.8815077e-7,0.000017833449,0.00042374272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963188,0.0010846776,0.000034183704,0.000030798623,0.0006468913,0.000005751023,2.5819938e-7,0.0000050910453,0.0018735116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985531,0.00024598133,0.0004182429,0.00011091359,0.00046434402,0.0002074368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991711,0.00015149663,0.00032481717,0.00009528455,0.00020323425,0.00005406936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015964947,0.00008949175,0.00022790761,0.00022429753,0.00065679103,0.0001046158,0.00022959296,0.00003473225,0.000007782764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029493903,0.000054790093,0.00012146973,0.0008243582,0.00037752144,0.00039315835,0.000041168892,0.00028730123,0.000024035517],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020987114,0.00025470968,0.0186599,0.000040540755,0.000738744,0.00046666194,0.94187945,0.0022017916,0.00022948293,0.003923505,0.007894803,0.023500556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018695413,0.000090088484,0.0073906956,0.00015356744,0.00023925905,0.00003669213,0.98122644,0.000016571306,0.000045509973,0.00071671454,0.009804795,0.000092725946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031406414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026184812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039346993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013538731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011460751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382394176","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.15667","title":"The Conflation of the Justification Framework for Infringement of Aboriginal Rights with the Oakes Test in Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Conflation; Indigenous; Test (biology); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04871593263422157,"score_gpt":0.3712439027538741,"score_spread":0.3225279701196525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382394176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888744,0.00064465904,0.000085040854,0.009735407,0.000243706,0.0002752111,0.0000035490557,0.0000030120052,0.00013504674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988458,0.00055451127,0.000052119598,0.000016463235,0.000117571624,0.000014734807,1.7927019e-7,0.0000027442936,0.00039587414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896336,0.00010247146,0.0003422219,0.000062701816,0.0004097373,0.00011952067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978312,0.001245388,0.0004488984,0.00006823792,0.00039368647,0.000012591796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015676679,0.000041497744,0.00013704278,0.000026235026,0.00044257886,0.00011733751,0.00023354667,0.00002533448,0.0000015861119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051487476,0.000026132826,0.00004150925,0.0003377765,0.0003586498,0.00018847166,0.000017041762,0.00011879062,3.3585297e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016000558,0.0001140843,0.91545445,0.00013580991,0.00010152602,0.000008379877,0.04733652,0.0009931397,0.00017538268,0.026812572,0.0026386392,0.006069509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028405734,0.00016340554,0.92709744,0.0008953415,0.000051657673,0.0000031220154,0.018995795,0.000024117246,0.000087658984,0.0060771983,0.046263147,0.000057034835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008449323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5059068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49745753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070225266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000920171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382584538","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.16001","title":"Are Delayed Complaints of Sexual Harassment Not Worthy of Human Rights Protection?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Sexual misconduct; Human rights; Complaint; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Criminology; Law; Misconduct; Legislature; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.15138902949215854,"score_gpt":0.4154950946278157,"score_spread":0.26410606513565715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382584538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99652165,0.00027459636,0.00009648413,0.0017926962,0.00054955494,0.00018319463,0.000012522562,0.000026526543,0.00054277905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997831,0.000059435526,0.00004515334,0.000034674526,0.0002893563,0.0000071396057,7.01137e-7,0.000007246671,0.0017253327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802727,0.00018511813,0.00069998304,0.00012128113,0.00076045713,0.00020589994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975833,0.000121563746,0.0011729087,0.00008322131,0.0009781584,0.00006084334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085695996,0.00012503975,0.000536733,0.00020294866,0.0007225585,0.000025454046,0.00019778086,0.000046474393,0.000019301513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013617269,0.000095182346,0.00008189915,0.00046131757,0.00038969686,0.00022474052,0.000087590306,0.00015022786,0.0000075664693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010380006,0.0011876135,0.71467793,0.00057300663,0.0077342424,0.0002698861,0.23156455,0.0015801627,0.0055025313,0.0054520424,0.026085746,0.004334289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031614008,0.0029054848,0.71840924,0.00065980904,0.00048647256,0.000020708416,0.19275342,0.000025371788,0.0038635111,0.0014322512,0.07566673,0.0006155615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006648078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006424916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04958099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007530987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003608765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5557409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382585266","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.14880","title":"Deductibility of Surrogacy Payments in Canadian Tax Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Tax credit; Tax deduction; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Business; Tax reform; Direct tax; Public economics; Income tax; Deductible; Ad valorem tax; State income tax; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Actuarial science; Gross income","score_opus":0.06932076726047351,"score_gpt":0.3876628382342725,"score_spread":0.31834207097379896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382585266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857289,0.0019606203,4.867855e-7,0.004029203,0.0009093633,0.00010514162,0.000008117866,0.00000871416,0.0072494224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851793,0.00042795046,0.0000064253745,0.00008173741,0.00035682306,0.0000017995704,2.4169287e-7,0.0000059209287,0.0006011781],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836797,0.00017819156,0.0005350757,0.00010378446,0.00044505775,0.00036994423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989371,0.00013488265,0.00029392415,0.00007182965,0.00038204162,0.00018024455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021169165,0.00008609147,0.00038451227,0.0001713776,0.00024807328,0.000047344845,0.00023391905,0.000048036574,0.00001163551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057434954,0.000070273665,0.00007921682,0.0005538386,0.00032039458,0.0004937697,0.000039912087,0.00014943368,0.0000123406235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002732314,0.000055681838,0.95235705,0.000104614155,0.00013941844,0.00016456515,0.035288166,0.000028483606,0.000051263924,0.00891288,0.0018327592,0.0010377648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013496386,0.0004216897,0.26352707,0.0009670075,0.0000757378,0.000021790858,0.09128781,0.0000018136153,0.00048956147,0.008957239,0.6324693,0.0004313188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80342495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9752349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026940077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006246461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2865677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391715129","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i1.15466","title":"A New Dawn for Canadian Platform Workers?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.05447726920712882,"score_gpt":0.3346798003244818,"score_spread":0.280202531117353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391715129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38078275,0.05833767,0.013906604,0.12895735,0.014273486,0.0011648224,0.00006353775,0.0001544367,0.40235934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99279284,0.00036898002,0.00026026642,0.00017410211,0.0008509552,0.000002389711,6.1194186e-7,0.0000057713382,0.0055440753],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993575,0.000008591332,0.00024474468,0.000055030097,0.00012738229,0.0002067414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953187,0.00011605813,0.00005488507,0.000026809976,0.00008662844,0.00018373755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043863023,0.00006415134,0.00014631043,0.000086826185,0.000264825,0.00036916803,0.00012166417,0.00003284324,0.000019245517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005070636,0.00005152028,0.00011090541,0.00011883727,0.00005875937,0.0014818945,0.000005600289,0.000090790025,0.00002062539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010202044,0.00001811023,0.009838009,0.00013474404,0.00093405705,0.00010414596,0.11446974,0.00006448288,0.0000012855666,0.10461261,0.098527856,0.67119294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014270592,0.00007866851,0.00039044122,0.00022202797,0.000030385148,0.00001020764,0.011993273,0.0000023972436,0.0000069242856,0.0039627254,0.9830917,0.00006855591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011171498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3611554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8845638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020689347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079249614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391715141","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i1.16782","title":"To Affirm Difference or To Deny Distinction?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15258623077202263,"score_gpt":0.46546570837745854,"score_spread":0.3128794776054359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391715141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9163446,0.00068446744,0.0026148101,0.061395995,0.0033546514,0.00015819614,0.000006614675,0.00006129924,0.015379383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97634375,0.00008467514,0.00014368196,0.0007153379,0.00066160917,0.0000042110487,8.327325e-8,0.0000060051498,0.022040658],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988819,0.00009294985,0.00027963048,0.00010789411,0.0004560524,0.00018159988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992995,0.00017830267,0.000053443036,0.000053654632,0.00022794321,0.00018715112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005973101,0.00008099196,0.00019045283,0.00010115839,0.00025592314,0.00029851,0.00019860156,0.000021429802,0.00006538509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005220433,0.00005372495,0.0000691237,0.00028383758,0.000091259615,0.0002423979,0.00006785967,0.00010172128,0.00013351286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048395369,0.0003069368,0.036337234,0.00025480025,0.0007373422,0.00073344365,0.4972947,0.00005700584,0.00027650996,0.24569197,0.04772929,0.1700968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014404848,0.0004560744,0.05186073,0.00048300583,0.000065577966,0.00001863995,0.023628995,0.0000010775158,0.00006151643,0.0016186443,0.9214755,0.00018617921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019061679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008192347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8737462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013208308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010311763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45715222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401074789","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i2.16977","title":"Court, Judges and the Pandemic: Computational Legal Insights from the Ontario Court of Appeal Corpus 2008-2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Court of record; Political science; Law of the case; Scrutiny; High Court; Aside; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.038990600245859555,"score_gpt":0.3059061628279254,"score_spread":0.26691556258206584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401074789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8187882,0.13615072,0.00023027,0.037708014,0.0017495465,0.00019713087,0.000028427708,0.000015238568,0.005132461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932103,0.0048333467,0.00004893203,0.0003817646,0.0011136176,0.0000037034706,0.0000011934067,0.0000048852744,0.0004022278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982699,0.00023494457,0.0004722552,0.00013585934,0.0007189789,0.00016805364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772596,0.0015116165,0.00024633313,0.000057519104,0.00040458507,0.00005397436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074627926,0.00014163162,0.00042021033,0.000038953167,0.00090781506,0.00017872777,0.00025613414,0.000042972035,0.000022320753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001645794,0.00007013449,0.00015461062,0.00014183523,0.0026751277,0.00031051063,0.00013515884,0.00035550268,0.000006494719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006984512,0.00013213237,0.36279097,0.000030299296,0.004894198,0.00026645043,0.17126368,0.0005072382,0.000024354444,0.4317881,0.019410733,0.008193386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015564497,0.00016612149,0.14646976,0.00054002076,0.00053771696,0.00010322693,0.040167224,0.000033403805,0.0000062877666,0.07396947,0.7362106,0.00023976254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054187268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27812347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7167998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018620907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056367565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401074888","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v15i2.19587","title":"The Importance of Historical Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; History; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05234838141283982,"score_gpt":0.2819594361468422,"score_spread":0.2296110547340024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401074888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04619936,0.8405385,0.000015238447,0.012672767,0.0141032105,0.00009600144,0.000013949375,0.000040975086,0.086320005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852449,0.0023978201,0.000012787775,0.00008035801,0.0027596727,0.0000025774848,8.674049e-8,0.000014765699,0.009487024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900687,0.0000366007,0.0004314939,0.00010014761,0.00029592912,0.00012894484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989704,0.00016215103,0.00023477402,0.00010336925,0.00048858614,0.000040736577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027800506,0.000117017844,0.00030488917,0.00015311952,0.0003640443,0.00007559357,0.00019577195,0.000016858114,0.000020121272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052876927,0.000068974754,0.00031400466,0.000055182783,0.0004985945,0.00024432724,0.000026862112,0.0002335311,0.000006815876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013613485,0.00009679754,0.0021159523,0.00012157443,0.0013619264,0.0002121342,0.17510079,0.0000011099634,0.000036396472,0.68469846,0.13515654,0.0009621633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010498665,0.00030929875,0.00019313107,0.00009898694,0.00011107951,0.000027485015,0.0086838035,3.7543253e-7,0.0000053897,0.008983006,0.9814005,0.00008196706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009156356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012726305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93904555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057293364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006877909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2812709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408694000","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v16i1.17012","title":"Gendered Credibility on Trial","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09285045392967897,"score_gpt":0.41472659513027543,"score_spread":0.3218761412005965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408694000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89068866,0.0072290073,0.00004018617,0.024875287,0.0050939946,0.0002618497,0.0000035148796,0.000029872463,0.07177761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840998,0.0015158524,0.000059684826,0.0009714186,0.0012670775,0.0000028071029,1.0948668e-7,0.00000283018,0.012080397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987728,0.00022040406,0.0003234554,0.000098954,0.00041003613,0.00017436108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991624,0.00020310558,0.00018646706,0.00008418707,0.00031001025,0.00005383708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011466179,0.000083453924,0.00027496865,0.000011237459,0.0005303632,0.00007538379,0.00023976696,0.00007396759,0.000022254917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005720521,0.000057176243,0.00021246207,0.0001611646,0.00033305038,0.00018214769,0.00004228238,0.0002573897,0.0000062412973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025879538,0.0016653732,0.034033593,0.00019663686,0.0042883237,0.00019353321,0.33012113,0.000099006,0.00017199286,0.1873851,0.39560688,0.02035892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009819115,0.00045107715,0.0029908118,0.00015062233,0.00010350299,0.0000022848685,0.0521062,2.455066e-7,0.00010623171,0.008195708,0.92595273,0.000121490266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003885632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034392832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53034586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015144167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018383263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40791783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408694008","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v16i1.22166","title":"Taking Proportionality Seriously: A Countercultural Approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0479502822394703,"score_gpt":0.40109034635655894,"score_spread":0.35314006411708865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408694008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95870817,0.0045619607,0.00052751094,0.009416682,0.00083408185,0.00014200468,0.000004024169,0.00002296066,0.025782606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961797,0.0007085768,0.00023723039,0.00048256488,0.00025445063,0.0000019971144,7.2237697e-7,0.0000027348303,0.0021320432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871796,0.000133292,0.00038464123,0.00010369363,0.00044838246,0.00021200434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887353,0.000044982724,0.00037001213,0.0000640883,0.00059373945,0.000053627246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009241213,0.000096547126,0.00028676185,0.00005523068,0.00042992036,0.00018494947,0.00026847134,0.000049286173,0.0000045756988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003266971,0.000071688504,0.00012906133,0.00020890647,0.00030086952,0.00073434657,0.00006867114,0.0002064269,0.0000019150882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028365024,0.0006230901,0.5126799,0.0003672972,0.0020176615,0.00022454803,0.12809399,0.00035270027,0.00011486935,0.3388798,0.009609669,0.006752854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014724991,0.00023684045,0.14072476,0.00068959413,0.00033527726,0.0001275034,0.20368405,0.000054280164,0.00001766851,0.0076996866,0.6444543,0.0005035298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054043817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002620763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6348446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022891899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021695058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33066434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}