{"meta":{"query_hash":"38c7fac8c10e","filters":{"venue":"Wildlife Monographs"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/38c7fac8c10e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Wildlife+Monographs"},"results":[{"id":"W1577177416","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1012","title":"Variation in mallard vital rates in Canadian Aspen Parklands: The Prairie Habitat Joint Venture assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Vital rates; Anatidae; Habitat; Ecology; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Biology; Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.009145012621733787,"score_gpt":0.23697943431055296,"score_spread":0.22783442168881918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577177416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991296,0.000027661757,0.000079345395,0.000012484955,7.2637687e-7,0.0000062145687,0.0004346718,0.0000032209502,0.00030615635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984382,0.000030812134,0.00032239073,0.00000906162,7.958814e-7,0.0000073418096,0.0009477963,0.0000017991432,0.00024177355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995339,0.00007413849,0.00002244245,0.000089230096,0.00018466474,0.00009569998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868065,0.00017736683,0.00031182807,0.00006571818,0.00052004243,0.00024448909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009135455,0.0001857932,0.00015842292,0.0011194812,0.00056112086,0.0005186321,0.0005230495,0.00015496716,0.00038976342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001914459,0.00012200857,0.00018184762,0.0012875348,0.00026976294,0.00021816426,0.00041881943,0.00019712391,0.00005484914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025496738,0.000009881638,0.9961922,0.0000044019193,0.000024425543,0.000017010976,0.00020447513,0.00025296208,0.00031176562,0.000030502448,0.00019049238,0.0027362788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.9494066e-7,0.0000041206486,0.9992849,0.0000013276806,0.0000036961917,0.00000632469,0.0001215002,0.0004168645,0.000031208205,0.0000038234853,0.00012368066,0.0000017505157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9002797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9800816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0997203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004301405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020224748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20061511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1709855586","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1013","title":"Spring migration ecology of the mid‐continent sandhill crane population with an emphasis on use of the Central Platte River Valley, Nebraska","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation; New Mexico Department of Game and Fish; Texas Parks and Wildlife Department","keywords":"Sandhill; Grus (genus); Habitat; Ecology; Population; Geography; Spring (device); Flyway; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.010900597129077235,"score_gpt":0.20273607545799527,"score_spread":0.19183547832891804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1709855586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99960464,0.000021285892,0.000019890078,0.000008975153,8.799103e-7,0.000002842214,0.00006174138,0.0000017419217,0.0002781195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995876,0.000030154957,0.000109093744,0.000007705623,9.867864e-7,0.0000042698484,0.00012423315,6.9884004e-7,0.00013534649],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999114,0.0000134202455,0.000005804671,0.00002272419,0.000019761243,0.000026802467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996872,0.000042737636,0.00009705483,0.000016138592,0.00006810567,0.000088841785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000104813094,0.00011060728,0.00011383133,0.00066173624,0.0004901224,0.00036992572,0.0002374482,0.0000791034,0.00072668557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003358078,0.00008504688,0.00008725286,0.0004602809,0.00026993686,0.0001489836,0.00023750412,0.00012082211,0.00006574134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030059116,0.000021008354,0.994125,0.000006759068,0.000011248297,0.00008411576,0.000654776,0.000052966614,0.0017042622,0.00002181446,0.00012606912,0.0031618737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011248941,0.000016418322,0.9991079,0.0000034353513,0.0000016184069,0.000037059926,0.00051356654,0.0000705875,0.00004367647,0.0000026503562,0.0002011165,7.828493e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23738547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5740652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23738547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072800944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053123693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47200745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955247685","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1","title":"Geographic distribution of the mid‐continent population of sandhill cranes and related management applications","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sandhill; Grus (genus); Geography; Population; Arctic; Ecology; Subspecies; Subarctic climate; Boreal; Fishery; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.011132650490509528,"score_gpt":0.2180421545135067,"score_spread":0.20690950402299718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955247685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981824,0.0001859955,0.00007745722,0.00004137944,0.000002834278,0.000010351315,0.00033811314,0.000006938524,0.0011546334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989761,0.00011567896,0.00025683275,0.000015435222,0.0000025648812,0.000007774525,0.00038480634,0.0000012595762,0.00023948718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998946,0.000017040526,0.000008550833,0.000032315285,0.000023455563,0.000023895429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996184,0.000042480166,0.00013279858,0.000019464014,0.00010773378,0.00007912444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014833777,0.000111459056,0.00009507632,0.0010517726,0.00036728446,0.0003237237,0.0002849648,0.000091212016,0.001362801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047769694,0.00006330274,0.00008984146,0.0010223751,0.00027291593,0.00013770477,0.00026250875,0.00011148978,0.000099456796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026183647,0.000012925024,0.99013036,0.000017057924,0.000016849583,0.000116280185,0.000430303,0.0000939769,0.00092167314,0.000058003716,0.00034843557,0.007827989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011211586,0.000007546391,0.9990079,0.000006171479,0.0000024540348,0.00005282218,0.00040256936,0.00009326671,0.000032761902,0.0000072605467,0.00038511542,0.0000011384395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25510234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43967327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25510234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065458403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000529314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50723493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017263064","doi":"10.1002/wmon.8","title":"Population ecology of breeding Pacific common eiders on the Yukon‐Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Avian clutch size; Ecology; Population; Predation; Nest (protein structural motif); Delta; Semelparity and iteroparity; Reproduction; Anatidae; Vital rates; Zoology; Demography; Population growth","score_opus":0.01838409835207137,"score_gpt":0.23829564817583293,"score_spread":0.21991154982376157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017263064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998622,0.00002009581,0.000017155171,0.0000012291781,3.2585203e-7,7.252483e-7,0.000026352312,5.7425234e-7,0.000071235845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975616,0.000026212947,0.00006427708,0.0000020995699,3.493848e-7,0.0000019939162,0.000078336554,2.662226e-7,0.000070229005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999223,0.000012658674,0.000009019653,0.000029381368,0.000014346031,0.000012273444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997414,0.000038858576,0.00009018224,0.000014774505,0.00006318911,0.000051561303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026779412,0.00012258887,0.00013783405,0.0005645515,0.00041177194,0.00033665582,0.00020116217,0.00012695281,0.00045585548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002846992,0.00012997219,0.00011148213,0.00038676462,0.00034408752,0.00019935376,0.00030904583,0.000092431364,0.000060173068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020714353,0.000009734321,0.99648297,0.000007470884,0.000019950345,0.000041489817,0.0003435239,0.0001346247,0.0013399356,0.000014960426,0.000020898053,0.0015637282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.1926665e-7,0.00001706869,0.99909365,0.0000037205102,0.0000070533893,0.000043385706,0.0005357609,0.00016506863,0.000059771464,0.000009140648,0.00006309093,0.0000013862033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052034967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15844977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052034967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005234316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031961163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103464186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102725612","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1014","title":"Habitat prioritization across large landscapes, multiple seasons, and novel areas: An example using greater sage‐grouse in Wyoming","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Endangered species; Grouse; Range (aeronautics); Population; Critical habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.02159565491022015,"score_gpt":0.24065216544456197,"score_spread":0.21905651053434183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102725612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99879164,0.000046659265,0.00059355743,0.00006725795,0.0000013539562,0.00001263767,0.00012206677,0.0000067933356,0.00035813884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963367,0.00006907769,0.002950055,0.00005110119,0.0000021641845,0.000017113229,0.0002379255,0.000005575177,0.00033028747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997962,0.000096381715,0.000009486551,0.000051079096,0.000014751675,0.000032026364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995259,0.00022005814,0.000066625325,0.000041872616,0.00006883011,0.000076681186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007179562,0.00030677288,0.00022063265,0.0005299152,0.00093158934,0.00065813615,0.0006363501,0.00050632574,0.0010774903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083177944,0.00015617539,0.0005298773,0.0009056911,0.00043936542,0.00053386175,0.0007217292,0.00030925838,0.000067833294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105313826,0.00017239072,0.9689521,0.000049932765,0.00015064808,0.00082178455,0.0015808793,0.01420622,0.002024423,0.0006900188,0.0009398639,0.010306486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024465988,0.00012278672,0.91552436,0.00003961425,0.000074140975,0.00028198893,0.0038737797,0.07727678,0.00035583836,0.0006071214,0.0017881274,0.000030993575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3851402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7684495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3851402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013987109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007571125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7657969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120240519","doi":"10.2193/0084-0173(2004)155[1:eosnap]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTS OF SUMMER‐AUTUMN NUTRITION AND PARTURITION DATE ON REPRODUCTION AND SURVIVAL OF ELK","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":423,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Boise Cascade (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Biology; Animal science; Herd; Population; Juvenile; Cervus elaphus; Ice calving; Pregnancy; Lactation; Ecology; Demography","score_opus":0.00988153548160768,"score_gpt":0.21823030240312422,"score_spread":0.20834876692151655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120240519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988496,0.000020543213,0.000013256247,0.0000024096175,5.7074004e-7,9.789969e-7,0.000021815416,8.507968e-7,0.00005461602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993148,0.000025116406,0.000084307685,0.000016406802,0.0000013747574,0.0000064706533,0.0001298875,0.0000021097726,0.00041939472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999892,0.00003271652,0.0000059171243,0.00002732202,0.00001346389,0.000028530687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995715,0.00012318433,0.000095681404,0.000025027417,0.000033874752,0.00015081004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029571963,0.00021326034,0.00015105374,0.00016184831,0.00018045129,0.00029503586,0.00014543453,0.00013091965,0.0010019004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032358945,0.000112335394,0.00014167115,0.00006788513,0.00017837434,0.00011176771,0.00016941059,0.0002371102,0.0001398354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072574993,0.0012122842,0.6890608,0.00005975791,0.00020368099,0.00026646737,0.00039252787,0.00040860803,0.28936413,0.000049547092,0.000197514,0.011527139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128367765,0.0011495404,0.9926918,0.0000027330996,0.000020298172,0.000043001568,0.00007655923,0.00028077443,0.005589917,0.000008332872,0.00012178126,0.0000023977898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024347133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007163691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024347133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004365503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018000447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0048410892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126366344","doi":"10.1002/wmon.6","title":"Population fragmentation and inter‐ecosystem movements of grizzly bears in western Canada and the northern United States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta; Cochrane; Ministry of Forests; Parks Canada; Foothills Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Geography; Population; Population fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Vital rates; Biodiversity; Physical geography; Population growth; Ursus; Biology; Demography; Gene flow; Genetic diversity","score_opus":0.009175892198426168,"score_gpt":0.19025970600650385,"score_spread":0.1810838138080777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126366344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99930406,0.0000798716,0.000023295957,0.000039338353,0.0000017668955,0.0000023769219,0.00016931912,0.0000014680832,0.00037848917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993692,0.000098161734,0.00006400068,0.000018199133,0.000001526187,0.000002639702,0.0002170546,0.000001095535,0.00022811886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998487,0.000016561382,0.0000061870965,0.000032682114,0.0000450417,0.000050786304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928623,0.0000576136,0.00015714126,0.000028287164,0.00027438768,0.00019639361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032269882,0.00013337574,0.00014830072,0.0008299189,0.0011804051,0.00056793354,0.00035221592,0.00015932291,0.0008413707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072622,0.000098640456,0.0001154853,0.0010487784,0.0005194739,0.00022312769,0.00042520653,0.00021833072,0.00007629453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034592624,0.000011320466,0.9960735,0.0000044361395,0.000023280336,0.00007245413,0.00070140883,0.00015580903,0.00024746687,0.000056287103,0.000293965,0.0023255285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016053311,0.000004303408,0.9986532,0.000005084566,0.0000048897655,0.00002328074,0.0009070018,0.00014780811,0.000023090228,0.000014086722,0.00021349668,0.0000021077726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9583491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04165089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042450265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031243775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08379233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139058541","doi":"10.1002/wmon.5","title":"Harvest, survival, and abundance of midcontinent lesser snow geese relative to population reduction efforts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Population; Goose; Ecology; Geography; Snow; Arctic; Waterfowl; Wildlife; Population growth; Anatidae; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.019040441243398216,"score_gpt":0.22370742792876813,"score_spread":0.20466698668536992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139058541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997764,0.000025265745,0.000020337506,0.000007810217,0.000001424454,0.0000022816655,0.00003201199,8.760179e-7,0.00013358926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995309,0.000025954389,0.000066857276,0.000016893417,0.0000042514234,0.0000058700653,0.00008237141,5.483666e-7,0.00026641446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988544,0.00003317173,0.0000076151337,0.000023403778,0.000026621057,0.000023704462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889946,0.00014386782,0.0004086911,0.000056416124,0.0001897779,0.00030169063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005047589,0.00012626166,0.000111293906,0.00026464072,0.00019022007,0.00025601205,0.0001509295,0.00018369926,0.0007219789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013653134,0.000069485715,0.00010864508,0.00012291438,0.00016449102,0.00025134347,0.00023953084,0.0002545704,0.00010985855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066861155,0.0003188417,0.99027795,0.000009132715,0.000049305683,0.00005111143,0.00023803422,0.00025803747,0.0021450548,0.000029423916,0.00011167723,0.0058429064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004082929,0.0003635431,0.999008,0.0000018316792,0.000009074629,0.000021044765,0.00010365247,0.0001861415,0.00018252448,0.000009892799,0.000108848566,0.0000014403241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062581687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01861317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062581687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019883607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016807162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012443483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168197368","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1010","title":"Influences of habitat composition, plant phenology, and population density on autumn indices of body condition in a northern white‐tailed deer population","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odocoileus; Biology; Reproduction; Population density; Population; Habitat; Ecology; Phenology; Physiological condition; Animal science; Demography","score_opus":0.005908821216749586,"score_gpt":0.21085383221937945,"score_spread":0.20494501100262985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168197368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99974936,0.000018831654,0.000025579728,0.0000045121974,4.932987e-7,0.0000010833736,0.00009240721,0.0000011627181,0.00010650254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997029,0.000010464367,0.000043966636,0.000004593526,8.0079775e-7,0.0000013757622,0.00012281329,7.4560523e-7,0.00011240816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984217,0.00003764463,0.0000099347135,0.00004107196,0.000031953394,0.000037315003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935204,0.000121229066,0.00015565274,0.000037581634,0.00014662786,0.00018675995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038444853,0.00015516528,0.00017142648,0.00058548857,0.00038418162,0.0004393939,0.00025490482,0.0001487427,0.00093307777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061590114,0.00012317004,0.00013106328,0.0004881104,0.00042873883,0.0001555362,0.00019912672,0.00015171718,0.00010464153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003212234,0.0000117844775,0.99781275,0.0000020378372,0.000019015366,0.000022352902,0.000077509576,0.000054840213,0.001033851,0.000005909,0.000046744328,0.00088101253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.411494e-7,0.000009891706,0.9997687,4.9742766e-7,0.000001943686,0.00001443584,0.000069095724,0.00008565871,0.000019889017,0.0000016539342,0.000027153737,6.628788e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25790802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5458501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25790802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009790849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000495862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5128137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173661514","doi":"10.2193/0084-0173.168","title":"Ruffed Grouse Population Ecology in the Appalachian Region","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Ecology; Geography; Population ecology; Population; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.00931809019767481,"score_gpt":0.22063587588656502,"score_spread":0.2113177856888902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173661514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99965954,0.000073129806,0.0000291112,0.0000071183417,8.167677e-7,0.000003191916,0.00005226431,0.0000015075659,0.0001732321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995197,0.0000842074,0.00010866477,0.000012704508,0.0000023404446,0.00001113295,0.00012495257,5.086661e-7,0.0001356782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998317,0.000048271104,0.000009437869,0.000046519013,0.00002816163,0.000035995887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996327,0.00009067415,0.00009434943,0.000020372003,0.00009761409,0.0000642602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022939012,0.00017233542,0.00015300319,0.0010208669,0.00050925236,0.00041142607,0.00024145875,0.00022848032,0.0006170133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039359098,0.00012288825,0.0001116942,0.0005397232,0.00033127388,0.00022815683,0.00034947408,0.0001503353,0.00010137131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005541688,0.00003823274,0.99033725,0.000026326243,0.000048348647,0.00039184245,0.00094520394,0.00014877101,0.0026324852,0.000022168031,0.0001061318,0.005247879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014496742,0.000035664638,0.99895275,0.0000071233962,0.000006437785,0.00014302882,0.0005182965,0.00014260387,0.00004584669,0.000006475197,0.00013766102,0.0000026731877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05792924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16831829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05792924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036918468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020431416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11518413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542707665","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1020","title":"Nutritional ecology of elk during summer and autumn in the Pacific Northwest","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Foraging; Ecology; Geography; Wildlife; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Population; Logging; Ecological succession; Seasonal breeder; Biology","score_opus":0.009091315865045243,"score_gpt":0.20421253412359622,"score_spread":0.19512121825855097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542707665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99977916,0.0000137245015,0.000015171528,0.0000050060553,2.84391e-7,0.0000012214178,0.00004914619,7.3572636e-7,0.00013550675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991954,0.00004672329,0.00012730854,0.000018307332,8.3135575e-7,0.0000052856512,0.0001865148,0.0000012845137,0.00041836916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999949,0.000007171186,0.0000030870842,0.00001660703,0.000010571464,0.000013538165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980086,0.000028735716,0.000061898376,0.000006390122,0.00003773379,0.00006445116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015396207,0.00014242058,0.00013396487,0.00036898375,0.00041808703,0.0003656517,0.00019486737,0.0001239629,0.0009421953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025632518,0.00010628029,0.000087125656,0.00024906718,0.00021808293,0.00021466923,0.00020221059,0.00015475038,0.00011621617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107674176,0.000076764125,0.99358857,0.000007763179,0.000017879704,0.00009041799,0.00035249945,0.00006955774,0.0031315435,0.000010327827,0.0000688909,0.002478049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.180689e-7,0.000022950018,0.99922407,0.0000018484408,0.0000026200457,0.000032071253,0.00049313455,0.000077246885,0.00007840067,0.000005877874,0.000060162343,7.731888e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062807985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24047062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062807985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006073065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032588386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124884784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2710315769","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1026","title":"Effects of control on the dynamics of an adjacent protected wolf population in interior Alaska","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service","keywords":"National park; Population; Canis; Geography; Biological dispersal; Predation; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Ungulate; Population size; Population growth; Minimum viable population; Habitat; Biology; Demography; Endangered species","score_opus":0.006583050920119122,"score_gpt":0.2171798462190705,"score_spread":0.21059679529895137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2710315769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992879,0.000044869204,0.000103112354,0.000023138133,0.000004306324,0.0000028102288,0.00023752633,0.000007055252,0.00028926434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993794,0.000030750813,0.00010649106,0.00001116476,0.000002953707,0.0000058596006,0.000346164,0.0000010326114,0.000116055235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996207,0.000085665466,0.000034617722,0.00014335012,0.00006820155,0.00004749191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987545,0.00021161986,0.00047487675,0.00012616339,0.0002032347,0.00022950578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007692797,0.0001950925,0.00019726643,0.00047100865,0.0005187332,0.00063606875,0.00042088082,0.00026050713,0.0006183856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018212498,0.00010908149,0.00026297543,0.00036145994,0.00033536914,0.00036614737,0.00058744865,0.00035398372,0.000070461116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007663983,0.000079473626,0.99252,0.000010267026,0.00008331894,0.00006343143,0.00023992526,0.0021960349,0.00048308558,0.00008851325,0.00026128325,0.0038980667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035275064,0.000075189804,0.9944318,0.000011578178,0.00003094105,0.000034229095,0.00045621995,0.0043962244,0.00014843576,0.00006386992,0.0003420265,0.000005984512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08820057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14173166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08820057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011685626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006284108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17537439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962683187","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1041","title":"Dynamics, Persistence, and Genetic Management of the Endangered Florida Panther Population","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; National Park Service; University of Florida; Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Texas Tech University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Population; Inbreeding; Inbreeding depression; Genetic diversity; Endangered species; Demography; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0071928581372453495,"score_gpt":0.20008937057682322,"score_spread":0.19289651243957787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962683187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996226,0.000026383337,0.00011728404,0.00004550648,6.0888067e-7,0.0000012589378,0.000020495461,0.0000028662353,0.00016296016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997209,0.000021267508,0.000108798646,0.000008155766,0.0000011913407,0.0000021783885,0.000038326372,4.3117885e-7,0.00009871543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991834,0.000018892835,0.000003090554,0.000030268908,0.000012821234,0.000016484284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966216,0.0000548219,0.00015802708,0.000020538067,0.0000657363,0.00003873614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030295202,0.00011025334,0.00006973571,0.0004837405,0.00029460105,0.00024786423,0.0002469789,0.00017560035,0.0010254835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051149965,0.000045086024,0.00006440903,0.00026851636,0.00034281155,0.00037753175,0.00026315977,0.00014910227,0.00006686059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007673511,0.000082684644,0.94009596,0.000031892854,0.00004936827,0.00028722247,0.0007042238,0.00248302,0.017293444,0.0004979793,0.00064224587,0.037755184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002852125,0.000121460056,0.9956611,0.000006335246,0.000009636311,0.0000838984,0.00041403522,0.0027660136,0.00022502214,0.0001571765,0.0005466487,0.0000058693736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016210072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047505587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016210072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062346854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032411216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03223145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972807113","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1044","title":"Evaluation of Maternal Penning to Improve Calf Survival in the Chisana Caribou Herd","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Agricultural Association; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; Yukon University; Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"National Park Service; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Predation; Herd; Population; Endangered species; Threatened species; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Demography; Reproductive success; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.017354388686777522,"score_gpt":0.2529787403467668,"score_spread":0.2356243516599893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972807113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99961394,0.00005921809,0.00017606586,0.000011806977,0.000001892945,0.000017209813,0.000017154216,0.0000043680448,0.00009844428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998495,0.00007698879,0.0011359573,0.00001729787,0.000002285697,0.000050554416,0.00004770387,0.0000013497283,0.00017292453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996463,0.00016688112,0.000021187174,0.000053807475,0.000071392446,0.00004045412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927825,0.0002422298,0.0001603483,0.000035436486,0.00012152419,0.00016220131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012507937,0.00023875809,0.00022639205,0.00026665375,0.00028917714,0.00030792356,0.00038965308,0.00023833597,0.00057082827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013774406,0.00010134116,0.00021214897,0.00013724205,0.00023886374,0.00020040022,0.00027758256,0.00022279395,0.000041237836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010048097,0.015236605,0.6297983,0.0004752196,0.0006262594,0.00029668852,0.0017954297,0.003986301,0.23064046,0.00033719878,0.00040333442,0.10635618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020920584,0.063733034,0.89929175,0.00006553169,0.00038616222,0.00011814157,0.00087412685,0.0072124107,0.026757197,0.00011009023,0.0012211361,0.00002114803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061758305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022662027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061758305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007383487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006757613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012279749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111272982","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1057","title":"Best Management Practices for Trapping Furbearers in the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service","keywords":"European union; Endangered species; Sustainability; Best practice; Population; Trap (plumbing); Political science; Business; Geography; Environmental planning; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; International trade; Environmental health; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.04514137134436708,"score_gpt":0.269431965951574,"score_spread":0.2242905946072069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111272982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8308855,0.0089209275,0.030265292,0.02530128,0.000917311,0.0026270598,0.001450747,0.0007206943,0.09891113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91524583,0.0044534104,0.06621097,0.0038874184,0.000067981564,0.00085378886,0.0011310492,0.00007286745,0.008076665],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937751,0.0027431666,0.00050264684,0.00052151066,0.002062226,0.0003952681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932467,0.00095981953,0.0013150218,0.00042255607,0.0034547327,0.0006011967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078942515,0.00035521403,0.00026016685,0.0018680602,0.0032956772,0.0017951321,0.0020044614,0.0009169399,0.0032192005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011022067,0.00030423107,0.00038529662,0.0010447277,0.00067625684,0.0013870919,0.0017337797,0.0008851991,0.00047215295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017829514,0.0021062077,0.34080842,0.0008576461,0.00018280375,0.0011287195,0.013590642,0.0054458925,0.012684182,0.0043794084,0.04181379,0.57682395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010126167,0.0033793752,0.5039444,0.0055198153,0.0004871498,0.002030157,0.10751312,0.0153753385,0.0139275985,0.0062075835,0.3411821,0.00033197738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052586675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16976364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052586675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028164338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060190465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10456115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122636377","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1060","title":"Behavioral and Demographic Responses of Mule Deer to Energy Development on Winter Range","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Shell Exploration and Production Company; Safari Club International Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Population; Ecology; Geography; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.017852422258676694,"score_gpt":0.24024856133756994,"score_spread":0.22239613907889325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122636377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996313,0.000019766901,0.00003966059,0.000009777713,0.000001307908,0.0000026450214,0.0001019559,0.0000018636548,0.00019175708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999257,0.00003326407,0.00011463563,0.000028481587,0.0000038018388,0.00001587242,0.00024508202,9.3638926e-7,0.00030091061],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999124,0.00002275833,0.000004776674,0.000027231114,0.00001410478,0.000018730438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999584,0.00007423588,0.00013786404,0.000023894543,0.000086805514,0.000093254755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028554953,0.00014886516,0.00011528318,0.0003064525,0.00027947433,0.00031484652,0.00013349878,0.0001493285,0.00070165034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004988539,0.000093407885,0.00013279378,0.00016920622,0.00017404128,0.00019729165,0.00021873432,0.00022482972,0.00009046111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062155494,0.00008172087,0.99440986,0.000007622233,0.000025447867,0.00003050641,0.0002450627,0.000096458076,0.0025480082,0.000012555533,0.00015541089,0.0023253183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.815961e-7,0.0000439782,0.99941564,0.0000019207732,0.0000036825936,0.000016875607,0.00020566485,0.000100566635,0.00011204178,0.0000060426414,0.00009221994,8.3177935e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071830545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038390048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071830545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002750152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013640262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014282465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289366748","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1038","title":"Issue Information – Editorial Board","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Park Service; Nevada Department of Wildlife; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Editorial board; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Library science; Internet privacy; Data science","score_opus":0.005421115318210893,"score_gpt":0.21874077854457413,"score_spread":0.21331966322636323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289366748","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025823497,0.004067268,0.00056403544,0.026306767,0.5464544,0.0004149735,0.0042998074,0.0012433957,0.41639104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010741829,0.0029831163,0.00022607739,0.005878489,0.084966056,0.00014172922,0.0025555557,0.00058244297,0.90159243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998019,0.00017380925,0.00014796677,0.0002568332,0.0012365486,0.00016579221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874113,0.0014165846,0.000666856,0.00071270985,0.0077308784,0.0020617438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021855815,0.0013951621,0.0014018466,0.0027559863,0.0017242925,0.007829586,0.001818652,0.0032154464,0.6697735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013583013,0.00052696886,0.00066375994,0.0024300606,0.0006812162,0.004776768,0.0016630525,0.0029552884,0.6086003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051732873,0.000004000902,0.0000075673947,0.000044081058,4.465966e-7,0.0000053257236,0.0000022034708,0.000005345498,0.0000210351,0.00010714625,0.9942399,0.00555763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000726478,0.000006340728,0.00009712486,0.00008348432,0.0000010384689,0.0000088816105,0.000011637197,0.000016710197,0.000037423193,0.00019628466,0.99953127,0.0000025500974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016373447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030365516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6697735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013978267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023295814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47102797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367679250","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1074","title":"Waterfowl distribution and productivity in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada: tools for conservation planning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Habitat; Anatidae; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Breeding bird survey; Geography; Population; Breeding pair; Biology","score_opus":0.03362484274412415,"score_gpt":0.24667022921634665,"score_spread":0.2130453864722225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367679250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9307604,0.007545164,0.012378819,0.006371632,0.00006288908,0.00033099437,0.022445263,0.0004760575,0.019628778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98458165,0.001722705,0.009181825,0.0000947093,0.0000102726835,0.00006968078,0.0024816063,0.000025643687,0.0018319353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972373,0.000060875303,0.000011894239,0.00005268082,0.000071511095,0.00007931198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985135,0.00020395893,0.00019980068,0.0000548914,0.00075847824,0.0002693321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063748035,0.00048428137,0.0003505502,0.0030539802,0.0015543344,0.0017716889,0.0014869481,0.0003184282,0.002894245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026588014,0.00031547,0.0004174077,0.0050827228,0.0005895829,0.0008090205,0.0007372582,0.0005286411,0.00014118459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004964243,0.000073142226,0.8961139,0.00023143245,0.00015860947,0.00019256448,0.0008994203,0.012728785,0.00040320485,0.002506156,0.01212454,0.074518554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017723065,0.000028538008,0.94692886,0.0003028906,0.0001057952,0.000060407183,0.0050720065,0.03886692,0.00013819894,0.0012942592,0.0071410337,0.000043275235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018258242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018258242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026389906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13247347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386892138","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1078","title":"Berries and bullets: influence of food and mortality risk on grizzly bears in British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative; Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation; Parks Canada; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Liber Ero Foundation; Liz Claiborne Art Ortenberg Foundation; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Geography; Forage; Population; Habitat; Wildlife; Human–wildlife conflict; Ecology; Wildlife management; National park; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.008611687857120172,"score_gpt":0.2089138964944685,"score_spread":0.20030220863734835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386892138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99846965,0.00009086036,0.000022093856,0.000093550065,0.0000032286887,0.000003743548,0.0003675629,0.0000023826185,0.00094680616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878806,0.00009133875,0.00003755104,0.000027894253,0.0000019262661,0.0000035562155,0.00026282226,0.000002228001,0.000784624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975365,0.000032803153,0.000011310139,0.00005209436,0.00005777935,0.000092328846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988047,0.00014134448,0.00023327404,0.000050654035,0.0004024729,0.00036762768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032019356,0.00016963042,0.00020906363,0.0007307544,0.0015909419,0.00079848454,0.0005473105,0.00028038066,0.002481939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012416099,0.0001298342,0.0001529921,0.001033621,0.0005030471,0.00025403794,0.0005825798,0.00041185535,0.0002320753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004091098,0.000015540101,0.99594444,0.0000051022716,0.000019546475,0.00008424978,0.00052741054,0.00010318699,0.00024097406,0.000029541192,0.0004731651,0.0025160327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.3158846e-7,0.0000036938836,0.9989943,0.0000034481716,0.0000034507702,0.000011429654,0.0006891942,0.00006810105,0.000011126387,0.0000060257507,0.00020713502,0.0000016898709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9474647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052535295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049420423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023193825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10568935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387341535","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1079","title":"Issue Information ‐ Cover","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative; Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation; Parks Canada; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Liz Claiborne Art Ortenberg Foundation; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Data science; Internet privacy; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.00984748537760167,"score_gpt":0.22801063167808575,"score_spread":0.21816314630048408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387341535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025105296,0.00038393243,0.00025614814,0.00091812265,0.002444459,0.00024164534,0.016857302,0.0012924456,0.9773548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036561379,0.00016865326,0.000065355154,0.0003659684,0.00026613014,0.00007964823,0.0039524566,0.00031830987,0.9944179],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994068,0.000060242706,0.000028416722,0.00007999196,0.00032939287,0.00009511254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823076,0.00038458285,0.00008225893,0.00017807522,0.00067521277,0.00044918555],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007156651,0.0019649933,0.0017876541,0.0041705593,0.0022353278,0.0054967874,0.0021968274,0.0039792033,0.9163522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034061198,0.0010363542,0.00082425907,0.00463432,0.00059987674,0.0030374294,0.0022354277,0.0023825807,0.90996945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023442964,0.00002960031,0.000027644279,0.00008502273,0.0000010901954,0.000008785002,0.0000061703377,0.000041500283,0.00006210503,0.00048188164,0.9865107,0.012722142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005086082,0.00002922006,0.00056606927,0.00012672429,0.0000030085866,0.000013747116,0.000023726263,0.00015558899,0.000092491275,0.0007457937,0.9981818,0.00001104871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012825131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020526635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9163522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015381111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022744006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11931342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391323676","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1081","title":"Less is more: vegetation changes coincide with white‐tailed deer suppression over thirty years","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Guelph; University of Waterloo","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Odocoileus; Understory; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology); Population; Biology; Species diversity; Plant community; Ecological succession; Canopy; Demography","score_opus":0.010302591364060091,"score_gpt":0.22767178953077458,"score_spread":0.2173691981667145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391323676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99908495,0.00008106769,0.00002945666,0.00006837654,0.0000038167454,0.0000021576031,0.00021615616,0.0000031617078,0.00051088806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999613,0.000023013645,0.000018153572,0.000014776905,0.0000034132265,0.0000016728313,0.00017170166,4.6838798e-7,0.00015386923],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990857,0.000011540181,0.000005173788,0.000018956795,0.00002571339,0.000030027133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990879,0.000101681864,0.00038142523,0.000031381856,0.00019537547,0.00020223358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022494956,0.00008553438,0.00013136143,0.000423247,0.00045511173,0.00048254305,0.0001956721,0.00032804967,0.0009890411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007956886,0.00007742735,0.00010208683,0.000386008,0.0003370466,0.00021828827,0.0003713166,0.00027491743,0.00014019107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022954034,0.000030284978,0.99213374,0.000020659416,0.000029268122,0.0002697786,0.000951764,0.00011426467,0.00307962,0.00005086733,0.00050930213,0.002580938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.5730273e-7,0.0000132851455,0.99927336,0.0000018641836,0.0000023415505,0.000031905627,0.00030706308,0.000050487353,0.00006348206,0.0000072768344,0.00024682345,0.0000014106006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088068835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28104612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088068835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010439313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043894176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17511243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}