{"meta":{"query_hash":"38c7fac8c10e","filters":{"venue":"Wildlife Monographs"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/38c7fac8c10e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Wildlife+Monographs"},"results":[{"id":"W1577177416","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1012","title":"Variation in mallard vital rates in Canadian Aspen Parklands: The Prairie Habitat Joint Venture assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Vital rates; Anatidae; Habitat; Ecology; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Biology; Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.009145012621733787,"score_gpt":0.23697943431055296,"score_spread":0.22783442168881918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577177416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906381,0.000014296195,0.00006381778,0.006297758,0.0001657327,0.00035907896,0.00000796112,0.0000138076975,0.002439491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774516,0.000006635966,0.00035656444,0.0016812494,0.00002484498,0.00008622598,0.000021658256,0.000009784603,0.000067880304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998732,0.00020007546,0.0002295327,0.00026414453,0.00015333538,0.0004209615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950975,0.000055151428,0.000069844195,0.00022424289,0.0000041807757,0.00013682306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007688765,0.00013349358,0.00014455318,0.00011234195,0.00013505675,0.000037132675,0.00021529636,0.00013226771,0.00029513013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042532603,0.00010180899,0.000052240935,0.00035687612,0.000132508,0.00018013248,0.0000618076,0.00028210744,0.00010985175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054881707,0.00006383917,0.9960092,0.0000014738246,0.0000041479975,0.000012893985,0.0003438489,0.0003421616,0.00009210214,0.000089598776,0.002386215,0.00064903154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032877337,0.000070208014,0.9888896,0.0000102379145,0.00000962366,0.0000037709647,0.000102474936,0.00044552368,0.000009487639,0.00073764607,0.009260058,0.00013260862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027077958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74558103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71850306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024518726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047394253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1709855586","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1013","title":"Spring migration ecology of the mid‐continent sandhill crane population with an emphasis on use of the Central Platte River Valley, Nebraska","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation; New Mexico Department of Game and Fish; Texas Parks and Wildlife Department","keywords":"Sandhill; Grus (genus); Habitat; Ecology; Population; Geography; Spring (device); Flyway; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.010900597129077235,"score_gpt":0.20273607545799527,"score_spread":0.19183547832891804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1709855586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99875873,0.0000023923258,0.000049036797,0.00068721024,0.00016393386,0.0002888402,0.000007636528,0.000012401433,0.000029821118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990115,0.0000053103845,0.00038798092,0.000503593,0.000016712624,0.000009364569,0.0000054012958,0.000009722492,0.000050380986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989812,0.00017789382,0.00022591703,0.00021413113,0.0001935109,0.00020735423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992851,0.000053061976,0.00023286467,0.00037113545,0.000009034007,0.00004880765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012572698,0.00012296227,0.00015261833,0.000036218473,0.00016184377,0.000007900733,0.00022738596,0.000095128366,0.00009031891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021894535,0.000070795664,0.000101777965,0.00020475757,0.00036137455,0.00018699275,0.000068002555,0.000107269814,0.000004636789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007271327,0.00016458746,0.9946791,0.0000027052752,0.000012064278,2.729958e-7,0.0003435039,0.002651166,0.0007101761,0.000024684812,0.00010714966,0.001231868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037996485,0.00021926823,0.9969295,0.000017304868,0.000059701335,0.000001970039,0.000023714114,0.00026095595,0.0014607989,0.00005238619,0.00050678075,0.00008761855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013131669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0115212975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010208131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003286882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052836917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6429154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955247685","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1","title":"Geographic distribution of the mid‐continent population of sandhill cranes and related management applications","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sandhill; Grus (genus); Geography; Population; Arctic; Ecology; Subspecies; Subarctic climate; Boreal; Fishery; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.011132650490509528,"score_gpt":0.2180421545135067,"score_spread":0.20690950402299718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955247685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99710405,0.00041099152,0.001071085,0.0001557809,0.00010342943,0.00042775687,0.000062014726,0.000011346085,0.0006535258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875367,0.00044623276,0.00016069919,0.000027185662,0.000008678477,0.00006504197,0.00040401364,0.0000071242275,0.0001273647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992517,0.00004473204,0.00033072973,0.00019195602,0.000099591256,0.000081240265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921656,0.000003897958,0.00024984678,0.00040432642,0.00009714739,0.000028198041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014270665,0.00008050912,0.00008810014,0.00006641448,0.00008549808,0.000005870031,0.00014367313,0.000073341245,0.000008639993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010068707,0.00006665005,0.00010276448,0.00028127135,0.00015957256,0.000004595762,0.000049324557,0.00003486777,9.857167e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009877375,0.00049681927,0.90356314,0.00021989948,0.00038237305,1.4310213e-7,0.00031621387,0.000017113742,0.044607032,0.04294036,0.0017255507,0.0056325956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028472545,0.0000319354,0.9620656,0.000019178451,0.00007173639,0.000002552194,0.00009072505,0.000013897048,0.02858508,0.00077256025,0.007972224,0.00008981896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037574955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000072400253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058502443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000020712573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000043882173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.271791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017263064","doi":"10.1002/wmon.8","title":"Population ecology of breeding Pacific common eiders on the Yukon‐Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Avian clutch size; Ecology; Population; Predation; Nest (protein structural motif); Delta; Semelparity and iteroparity; Reproduction; Anatidae; Vital rates; Zoology; Demography; Population growth","score_opus":0.01838409835207137,"score_gpt":0.23829564817583293,"score_spread":0.21991154982376157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017263064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956916,0.000017393166,0.000012819569,0.0010102771,0.0003135039,0.00023952748,0.000008931537,0.000034631466,0.002671313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986186,0.00001121877,0.00014453196,0.001029484,0.000040082996,0.000031744778,0.000014341259,0.000013910221,0.00009607415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885577,0.00014043269,0.00025481483,0.00018201505,0.00017673477,0.00039024034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927765,0.00017720743,0.00016181258,0.00028397545,0.0000046754258,0.00009468999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004543584,0.00014496471,0.00018179239,0.000069095986,0.00025071847,0.000007926814,0.00023246021,0.0001458771,0.0008982474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002777037,0.000105965875,0.00010905206,0.00027654372,0.00035339693,0.00019879655,0.00008823349,0.00019278737,0.00024236487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018738507,0.00015502292,0.9937434,0.0000016770044,0.000011419977,7.441053e-7,0.0004088661,0.00007559965,0.000116190684,0.00021758283,0.0033877098,0.0018630471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014121972,0.00013486171,0.9974932,0.0000060065086,0.0000330681,0.0000055110654,0.00046267768,0.000034006516,0.00016279367,0.00035532634,0.0010527677,0.00011857651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001402556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028093587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037497832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054282096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002738666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102725612","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1014","title":"Habitat prioritization across large landscapes, multiple seasons, and novel areas: An example using greater sage‐grouse in Wyoming","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Endangered species; Grouse; Range (aeronautics); Population; Critical habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.02159565491022015,"score_gpt":0.24065216544456197,"score_spread":0.21905651053434183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102725612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98250115,0.00006747473,0.01666018,0.0001393392,0.000080624435,0.0003053019,0.000034033517,0.00007494945,0.0001369656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957701,0.000045116918,0.0031542473,0.0008151244,0.00006744904,0.0000217127,0.000050791605,0.000032207423,0.00004327279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982912,0.00009095769,0.00021109622,0.00055196707,0.0002498989,0.0006048665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993492,0.000047871876,0.00008412639,0.0003312446,0.0000058811916,0.00018168491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006687761,0.00022971425,0.00022234944,0.00009066096,0.00031424596,0.00014755085,0.00017657276,0.00008943915,0.000031529125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028703404,0.00021314657,0.000053005977,0.00035088105,0.00007834971,0.00053024956,0.00023960142,0.000117209405,0.000013163934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022078953,0.00012228898,0.9922681,0.000018439794,0.000008945105,0.000004453834,0.0012530253,0.0009918181,0.0003076357,0.000025286416,0.00032043215,0.0046574995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020654465,0.000064528234,0.89342177,0.00006823064,0.000018255136,0.0000076229803,0.00072281755,0.08290876,0.000032274103,0.0000752688,0.020244554,0.00037047674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012973056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004672318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09884633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004942492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032206976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8691865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120240519","doi":"10.2193/0084-0173(2004)155[1:eosnap]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTS OF SUMMER‐AUTUMN NUTRITION AND PARTURITION DATE ON REPRODUCTION AND SURVIVAL OF ELK","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":423,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Boise Cascade (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Biology; Animal science; Herd; Population; Juvenile; Cervus elaphus; Ice calving; Pregnancy; Lactation; Ecology; Demography","score_opus":0.00988153548160768,"score_gpt":0.21823030240312422,"score_spread":0.20834876692151655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120240519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980707,0.00017308486,0.00008300042,0.001073448,0.0001335229,0.00029428725,0.0000061474907,0.000020307936,0.00014550186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986487,0.000586642,0.00044032087,0.00023202701,0.000029377918,0.000028864091,0.000017897668,0.000006528318,0.0000096519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917775,0.0000710927,0.0002035544,0.00029148965,0.00013747325,0.00011860828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958676,0.000067351575,0.00013123128,0.00015766635,0.000010593912,0.000046416302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023839474,0.00009901983,0.00015500384,0.00007183386,0.000080100384,0.000005621206,0.00004687381,0.000083173494,0.000011919781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056359575,0.00009976115,0.00003351115,0.00021533211,0.00030254334,0.00020094018,0.00003523192,0.0000755413,0.0000043364653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000203354,0.000565102,0.9800464,0.00019419643,0.00003259824,0.000003364334,0.00036347908,0.00013037468,0.01101284,0.0018034761,0.0011165099,0.004528301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001115189,0.00032146767,0.9800663,0.00008835483,0.000033434408,0.000004705387,0.00005393938,0.000023711616,0.013023814,0.0044174013,0.0007496869,0.00010197576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013193901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048340567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044263247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000127893845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004370279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40681416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126366344","doi":"10.1002/wmon.6","title":"Population fragmentation and inter‐ecosystem movements of grizzly bears in western Canada and the northern United States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta; Cochrane; Ministry of Forests; Parks Canada; Foothills Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Geography; Population; Population fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Vital rates; Biodiversity; Physical geography; Population growth; Ursus; Biology; Demography; Gene flow; Genetic diversity","score_opus":0.009175892198426168,"score_gpt":0.19025970600650385,"score_spread":0.1810838138080777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126366344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993163,0.00001591059,0.000035446166,0.00026031063,0.000055690038,0.00024564817,0.000012165083,0.0000067625983,0.00005177864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987075,0.000036161753,0.00006164728,0.0010958533,0.000003199991,0.000023452601,0.000046182187,0.0000054474167,0.000020608686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992593,0.00012100375,0.00025068072,0.00014548253,0.00011127449,0.00011224853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996672,0.000053344997,0.00013823486,0.00009949353,0.00000761563,0.000034097186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024451778,0.00008413939,0.00011831927,0.0000641138,0.00006365657,0.000007864923,0.00007640113,0.00003726797,0.00002481259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000115661,0.00006586944,0.000013528368,0.00022271994,0.00011014109,0.00014330515,0.000054797492,0.000060707443,0.0000011753654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006618118,0.00001789937,0.9963502,0.000007172631,0.0000138472615,0.0000010044517,0.0025470243,0.0001151309,0.000003095276,0.00002244817,0.00006528031,0.0007906596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007210852,0.00003245226,0.9963541,0.000017756878,0.000009545253,0.0000012461103,0.000821057,0.0012912002,0.000008609715,0.0005694077,0.000107262815,0.00006629795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66847414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9334897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2650155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004329572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007248375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3337335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139058541","doi":"10.1002/wmon.5","title":"Harvest, survival, and abundance of midcontinent lesser snow geese relative to population reduction efforts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Population; Goose; Ecology; Geography; Snow; Arctic; Waterfowl; Wildlife; Population growth; Anatidae; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.019040441243398216,"score_gpt":0.22370742792876813,"score_spread":0.20466698668536992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139058541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99174005,0.000052037285,0.0009923184,0.0005656323,0.00023680796,0.00038642407,0.000007600538,0.000040658113,0.0059784963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996416,0.00009221574,0.0024683767,0.00014956947,0.000035028545,0.000030467674,0.000014299616,0.000015954427,0.00077814196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881566,0.00005536439,0.00029191255,0.0003609395,0.000251025,0.00022507594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994354,0.000015563053,0.00013979097,0.00026236713,0.000011007523,0.00013585044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023806714,0.00016256596,0.00019786858,0.00010677196,0.00010871348,0.000019024772,0.00012877266,0.00005539613,0.00014145602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020790689,0.00014534155,0.00006960469,0.00036967872,0.00012424194,0.0004019283,0.00012467202,0.000074712596,0.000034258956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007697894,0.00013842135,0.9781882,0.000018267061,0.000038208087,0.0000027739673,0.0016703906,0.00019179616,0.0003572618,0.0010382135,0.009314237,0.008965221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027641404,0.00011831501,0.9867737,0.00005302251,0.000029738352,0.0000021416545,0.00017573967,0.00007511662,0.00025237378,0.0012494471,0.010804318,0.0001896158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018904763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021789642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008775606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027532264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019444278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59268564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168197368","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1010","title":"Influences of habitat composition, plant phenology, and population density on autumn indices of body condition in a northern white‐tailed deer population","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odocoileus; Biology; Reproduction; Population density; Population; Habitat; Ecology; Phenology; Physiological condition; Animal science; Demography","score_opus":0.005908821216749586,"score_gpt":0.21085383221937945,"score_spread":0.20494501100262985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168197368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99916834,0.000009147421,0.00006591233,0.00032821464,0.00006300915,0.00023440062,0.00001606275,0.000021754739,0.000093135845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903876,0.0000066529647,0.000263574,0.00039502222,0.0000117348145,0.000016796685,0.00025874554,0.0000064130086,0.0000022767251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882877,0.00018988065,0.0004056491,0.00024593683,0.00018296475,0.00014678815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993333,0.0001098687,0.0003532833,0.00014438407,0.000017949165,0.000041203708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032593703,0.00012555308,0.00023423797,0.00019414947,0.00010203826,0.000007876464,0.000089509,0.00014393544,0.000028818773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046987665,0.00012213069,0.000038129154,0.0002862368,0.00022215117,0.00027078035,0.00003739899,0.000103912724,0.000007331766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010540718,0.00010577155,0.99691814,0.000015203277,0.000012982317,5.3791194e-7,0.0003139095,0.0013111247,0.00034950668,0.00034106724,0.00007938142,0.00044696635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049798423,0.0001880158,0.9943133,0.00004701246,0.000021904454,0.0000027168685,0.00005659375,0.0013427647,0.00008029871,0.0033253024,0.0000096663325,0.000114447445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010361752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01076353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009727354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003810704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004720363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6006302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173661514","doi":"10.2193/0084-0173.168","title":"Ruffed Grouse Population Ecology in the Appalachian Region","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Ecology; Geography; Population ecology; Population; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.00931809019767481,"score_gpt":0.22063587588656502,"score_spread":0.2113177856888902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173661514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836163,0.000016446389,0.0005547683,0.0025631732,0.00015698663,0.00037529162,7.8390593e-7,0.00004951441,0.01266677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943211,0.000030595675,0.0002249489,0.005148976,0.000068838934,0.000022070244,0.00001940651,0.000010779757,0.00015328598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998749,0.00011040623,0.0002564808,0.00026928555,0.0002460929,0.00036870598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994846,0.00006911808,0.00007691245,0.00030670527,0.0000019066167,0.000060743354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008839687,0.00013388602,0.00011906224,0.00012827413,0.0001517181,0.000031399937,0.00030200405,0.000074809985,0.0000556759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015810972,0.00009514258,0.00007624735,0.0005783935,0.000090840455,0.00013992157,0.00007216337,0.00014705326,0.0001074846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021679545,0.00009445494,0.9744453,0.0000027083217,0.0000044125663,0.00003198603,0.00053811795,0.00017984619,0.000005442111,0.00041829946,0.01621689,0.008040848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034197365,0.0000550892,0.96463037,0.000005338555,0.000008574911,0.000008737625,0.0002928034,0.00015438467,0.0000016935456,0.0014109412,0.032965265,0.00012484538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010104424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031007496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016748374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054016633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000013030151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3879802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542707665","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1020","title":"Nutritional ecology of elk during summer and autumn in the Pacific Northwest","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Foraging; Ecology; Geography; Wildlife; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Population; Logging; Ecological succession; Seasonal breeder; Biology","score_opus":0.009091315865045243,"score_gpt":0.20421253412359622,"score_spread":0.19512121825855097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542707665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936785,0.00002396501,0.000008425774,0.005437924,0.00005283606,0.00014617784,0.000015645273,0.0000106309935,0.0006259064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898434,0.00009839447,0.00009794606,0.00068495865,0.000019013647,0.000047194357,0.000005432546,0.0000045564866,0.000058170222],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991997,0.00010682107,0.00019864045,0.00019232741,0.00011484237,0.00018767959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995666,0.00017316166,0.00007054633,0.00015157118,0.000005157034,0.000032954827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002693079,0.00008468533,0.00010565161,0.00006955638,0.000100982295,0.000005553557,0.00014348362,0.000077292505,0.0002846629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025064366,0.00005356883,0.00003836888,0.00023860557,0.00041920174,0.00015671864,0.00005207794,0.00007102034,0.00003748211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002603453,0.0000810883,0.9971021,0.0000035056405,0.000006206668,0.000004523601,0.00020585486,0.000003485851,0.0003856429,0.00029713093,0.0015532286,0.00033118896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005338599,0.00005591588,0.9956718,0.0000107554515,0.0000058747573,0.000013099712,0.00012957992,0.0000060962907,0.00004592306,0.0014916093,0.0019613716,0.00007412948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000115604584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014939054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005305845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002050613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075568005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31168592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2710315769","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1026","title":"Effects of control on the dynamics of an adjacent protected wolf population in interior Alaska","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service","keywords":"National park; Population; Canis; Geography; Biological dispersal; Predation; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Ungulate; Population size; Population growth; Minimum viable population; Habitat; Biology; Demography; Endangered species","score_opus":0.006583050920119122,"score_gpt":0.2171798462190705,"score_spread":0.21059679529895137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2710315769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972619,0.000004210952,0.00012018475,0.001555889,0.000099925586,0.00077577174,0.000006911713,0.000012848304,0.00016234678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992708,0.0000046050013,0.00012581682,0.00046390618,0.000008990898,0.0000905153,0.000008646126,0.000007709731,0.000018992903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909955,0.0001648143,0.00025618746,0.00018003322,0.00015290221,0.00014651935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999082,0.00011519081,0.00034403073,0.0004149742,0.000009488835,0.00003429911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031696982,0.000104350525,0.00017620667,0.00006081355,0.00014365402,0.000013803757,0.0003395907,0.000092143135,0.000043163454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020867342,0.00007897422,0.00005831368,0.00011661627,0.00024364046,0.0001969091,0.000058862784,0.00012787805,0.0000071130285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015503496,0.0001330119,0.99508816,0.000012953335,0.000012685928,0.0000014977734,0.00015458123,0.00019149364,0.00039551442,0.0003000405,0.000077568046,0.003477451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007100088,0.00024168097,0.99051845,0.00005708507,0.000013524665,4.843387e-7,0.00003359208,0.0073037497,0.00033289357,0.000697383,0.000015986912,0.00007515997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007753916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017658685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007112256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051264946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005975744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3220475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962683187","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1041","title":"Dynamics, Persistence, and Genetic Management of the Endangered Florida Panther Population","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; National Park Service; University of Florida; Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Texas Tech University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Population; Inbreeding; Inbreeding depression; Genetic diversity; Endangered species; Demography; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0071928581372453495,"score_gpt":0.20008937057682322,"score_spread":0.19289651243957787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962683187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970006,0.00055664673,0.0005086395,0.00011611728,0.00024617775,0.00027497738,0.000021807007,0.0000053225986,0.0012697306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924578,0.00010606695,0.0066049392,0.00011717623,0.00003433072,0.000009143232,0.0000282308,0.000012686198,0.0006296172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936885,0.00003091905,0.00014409932,0.00022195597,0.00010366332,0.00013054161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995211,0.0000037066661,0.000071730894,0.00034927778,0.000020237258,0.000033997025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000040536946,0.00010437135,0.00009366773,0.000026323061,0.00004457282,0.000008019839,0.00016222562,0.00006869613,0.000012822799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002156211,0.00008084529,0.000082277795,0.000090482485,0.00007852167,0.000001792669,0.0000975546,0.000040164094,0.0000023706657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000434065,0.00003595649,0.98518264,0.000085556414,0.00015842913,2.1048733e-7,0.00012273913,0.00045008498,0.0018345783,0.0032717115,0.00040718488,0.008407518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029260537,0.000101706435,0.9968593,0.000025623887,0.0000399243,0.0000041202056,0.00023288662,0.00009745879,0.0004156754,0.00087637204,0.0009432471,0.00011109742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002013486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016042191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011676659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004644652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006464476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32967752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972807113","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1044","title":"Evaluation of Maternal Penning to Improve Calf Survival in the Chisana Caribou Herd","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Agricultural Association; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; Yukon University; Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"National Park Service; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Predation; Herd; Population; Endangered species; Threatened species; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Demography; Reproductive success; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.017354388686777522,"score_gpt":0.2529787403467668,"score_spread":0.2356243516599893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972807113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994292,0.000016331947,0.000039388975,0.0011123565,0.00033886367,0.00059751474,0.000007391136,0.000011431568,0.0035847141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824464,0.0000025638324,0.00018750381,0.0014065545,0.000025683976,0.0000670374,0.000008157667,0.000007688037,0.000050178412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983086,0.00031756007,0.00025701866,0.00025094347,0.0006428381,0.00022306979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994596,0.000073441086,0.00010043132,0.00030106996,0.000023621264,0.00004184045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025234038,0.00010798537,0.00014073357,0.00007452222,0.000061882056,0.000017171584,0.00030694102,0.00007307973,0.0006147931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063660475,0.00008575692,0.000058722522,0.0004342221,0.00007077305,0.00016598299,0.00008045974,0.00012884186,0.00019859601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022392993,0.000039452854,0.9915268,0.0000029672133,0.000010676556,6.7229246e-7,0.0009569913,0.0017557788,0.00056350796,0.00009694442,0.00094947993,0.004074335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043609113,0.00009226139,0.99487334,0.000010529819,0.000029020874,0.0000014202599,0.00038230265,0.0026395158,0.00009090144,0.0007446834,0.00060221466,0.00009770134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021677194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017752625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003976634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007521025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025854555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6731553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111272982","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1057","title":"Best Management Practices for Trapping Furbearers in the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service","keywords":"European union; Endangered species; Sustainability; Best practice; Population; Trap (plumbing); Political science; Business; Geography; Environmental planning; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; International trade; Environmental health; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.04514137134436708,"score_gpt":0.269431965951574,"score_spread":0.2242905946072069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111272982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93705696,0.00002560998,0.0008362867,0.05899315,0.00005559906,0.0006779525,0.0000075682974,0.000037960344,0.0023088926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393776,0.0001782292,0.0016118587,0.05832875,0.000040318944,0.0002730834,0.000096580065,0.000012238147,0.000081352904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990847,0.00010128411,0.00018597202,0.0002485342,0.00014977317,0.00022974008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999452,0.00019690933,0.00015332503,0.00014021026,0.000005125144,0.00005240606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036418674,0.00010611404,0.000089385045,0.000064966385,0.00016863154,0.000040706604,0.0002998974,0.000048648755,0.000091507805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006458944,0.00008482098,0.000054006417,0.00084442843,0.00010912878,0.00022237809,0.000050548504,0.000119672106,0.00007469911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001300746,0.00016516558,0.8733982,0.000036283353,0.000054168493,0.000015370902,0.007672412,0.005066441,0.000015207444,0.00056013104,0.10943915,0.0034474088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009348198,0.00026822538,0.3417467,0.000019523484,0.00007055448,0.0000024618382,0.014303473,0.0147151705,0.000008406904,0.0012218972,0.62645155,0.0002572071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027019487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016333858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5316515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018580378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036262554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34588993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122636377","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1060","title":"Behavioral and Demographic Responses of Mule Deer to Energy Development on Winter Range","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Shell Exploration and Production Company; Safari Club International Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Population; Ecology; Geography; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.017852422258676694,"score_gpt":0.24024856133756994,"score_spread":0.22239613907889325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122636377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997863,0.000060207258,0.00017583741,0.0011905171,0.000098601755,0.000086209904,0.0000060879597,0.000025970854,0.00049354887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909815,0.000026241443,0.0030381458,0.0053034313,0.00001194517,0.000047789985,0.000010541606,0.000011808684,0.00056855456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891937,0.00010405218,0.00024200686,0.00032562178,0.00019034458,0.00021857973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995047,0.00007311182,0.00005870335,0.00022024609,0.000018097,0.00012513234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017699842,0.00013792612,0.00016288478,0.00013208984,0.00012474456,0.000013920686,0.00011423802,0.0000915338,0.00034579387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000305356,0.00013627585,0.00006248254,0.00046780362,0.00015161678,0.00009508423,0.00013787345,0.00007502049,0.000035587746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012808772,0.000166887,0.98512995,0.0000026814994,0.00001849837,0.000014868903,0.0004807668,0.000018340786,0.0007402782,0.0000816878,0.005610286,0.0076076374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003036525,0.00014256017,0.96104664,0.00002150849,0.000016479873,0.000007679696,0.00009484213,0.000010229248,0.0023388695,0.000120127115,0.035740133,0.00015725254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064638654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009506593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030129848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002410747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022335604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5557168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289366748","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1038","title":"Issue Information – Editorial Board","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Park Service; Nevada Department of Wildlife; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Editorial board; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Library science; Internet privacy; Data science","score_opus":0.005421115318210893,"score_gpt":0.21874077854457413,"score_spread":0.21331966322636323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289366748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012733691,0.00012348428,0.00045909223,0.0014352646,0.24125801,0.00092558487,0.00031413074,0.00015967898,0.7540514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003031166,0.003647825,0.0026872316,0.027535552,0.37085736,0.0007269207,0.0060906378,0.0002857943,0.58513755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997264,0.000074634496,0.0005664017,0.00048484374,0.0010098629,0.0006002027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986654,0.00002762504,0.00035359646,0.0006850644,0.000027445616,0.00024084725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003158193,0.0005085219,0.00043246624,0.00022939466,0.00028565113,0.0002594089,0.00073720724,0.0005418921,0.027649589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023409968,0.00045176016,0.00028120723,0.00053435506,0.000314345,0.00076672883,0.0004802306,0.00040976805,0.2812904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003330608,0.000038423626,0.0009535829,0.00003730104,0.0000541,9.1261484e-7,0.000250089,0.000112977155,0.0000013343721,0.0000035793582,0.9941408,0.004373587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047274976,0.0001414497,0.0005454661,0.00005698824,0.000054600565,7.8930907e-7,0.000053439868,0.00004913814,0.0000074400245,0.0000669198,0.99799424,0.0005567891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062359055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000330023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25364083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001262373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021996917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367679250","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1074","title":"Waterfowl distribution and productivity in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada: tools for conservation planning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Habitat; Anatidae; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Breeding bird survey; Geography; Population; Breeding pair; Biology","score_opus":0.03362484274412415,"score_gpt":0.24667022921634665,"score_spread":0.2130453864722225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367679250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927781,0.0000054157704,0.00017100494,0.0065816245,0.000044955723,0.00034799066,0.00003436941,0.000011627738,0.000024888584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995,0.0000018535039,0.000040537256,0.00022778707,0.000008804632,0.00007314626,0.0000917106,0.0000028013483,0.00005340728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947006,0.000048292415,0.00011100856,0.00013895986,0.0000841858,0.00014752234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997202,0.00010580687,0.000054743163,0.00009711764,0.0000049509254,0.000017194081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003601796,0.000053355925,0.00007161642,0.00001826464,0.00011860779,0.000008815912,0.00006780446,0.00003769197,0.0000021774968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091506816,0.0000401908,0.000015079592,0.0002612289,0.00013418388,0.00016205473,0.000027648546,0.000054487376,7.462063e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022016968,0.00001994963,0.9692447,0.0000064748206,0.0000017273215,0.0000053422696,0.00028872487,0.0000995377,0.000118701224,0.000021200241,0.029112747,0.0010588487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001440099,0.000041809777,0.9924927,0.000007485479,0.0000069984862,0.0000054506154,0.00030428902,0.000116276475,0.0002478902,0.00028124897,0.006302523,0.000049329105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004905649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046777014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041871365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000311656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018672841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386892138","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1078","title":"Berries and bullets: influence of food and mortality risk on grizzly bears in British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative; Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation; Parks Canada; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Liber Ero Foundation; Liz Claiborne Art Ortenberg Foundation; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Geography; Forage; Population; Habitat; Wildlife; Human–wildlife conflict; Ecology; Wildlife management; National park; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.008611687857120172,"score_gpt":0.2089138964944685,"score_spread":0.20030220863734835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386892138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99927,0.000041265226,0.0000010435789,0.00023009027,0.0000345617,0.00020063038,0.00005929462,0.00004214237,0.00012092834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867034,0.00047504102,0.000072768235,0.0006802165,0.0000058268897,0.00003567958,0.000008372987,0.0000075473145,0.00004423074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990258,0.00008253492,0.00023495487,0.00030069373,0.00015227393,0.00020369684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995546,0.00011403957,0.000100007,0.00015719634,0.000006174662,0.00006798607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035894787,0.0000787879,0.00016431781,0.00005330784,0.00015011453,0.00004711278,0.00009451402,0.00009695381,0.000047615056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011915098,0.000120561504,0.000028003193,0.0005142602,0.00054157176,0.00017043515,0.000114603594,0.00013902695,0.000013445006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005843607,0.000034848956,0.9942447,0.000009092791,0.0000148849595,0.00000702207,0.00023516758,0.000277488,0.000017086482,0.000012980165,0.0034707522,0.0016701391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032935347,0.00016299367,0.994827,0.00003222886,0.000012940379,0.0000038278245,0.00013885328,0.00009637415,0.000005892192,0.0038632907,0.00041126585,0.0001160359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02149701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12018429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098687276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000134268375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071786653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387341535","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1079","title":"Issue Information ‐ Cover","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative; Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation; Parks Canada; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Liz Claiborne Art Ortenberg Foundation; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Data science; Internet privacy; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.00984748537760167,"score_gpt":0.22801063167808575,"score_spread":0.21816314630048408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387341535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030877804,0.00014633883,0.0007653533,0.0075976835,0.01745522,0.0013475195,0.00057546125,0.000509595,0.940725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0074926703,0.0016336218,0.0006286654,0.05184844,0.0011156189,0.0005981881,0.006657199,0.00014558175,0.92988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981753,0.00008888424,0.0005019313,0.00036471817,0.00040675886,0.00046238388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989382,0.00009436811,0.00033289357,0.0004804882,0.00001881726,0.00013523622],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002789675,0.00035535626,0.00033396602,0.00023615667,0.0002684751,0.00008944277,0.00045430879,0.00063812005,0.04461987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058682377,0.00036172342,0.0001888531,0.00089082913,0.00023945104,0.0008536712,0.00027046798,0.00046031515,0.7086555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001783883,0.000021372256,0.021057006,0.000023458704,0.00004211288,0.0000017895741,0.00019512235,0.0010337272,9.567722e-7,0.000014458263,0.97553736,0.0020548115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023395922,0.000051512234,0.055665243,0.00003096475,0.000032916832,0.0000024851145,0.000042861757,0.00025259797,0.000004052433,0.00015422389,0.9431519,0.00037726908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037186145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047215868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6640356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011978724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041808165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391323676","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1081","title":"Less is more: vegetation changes coincide with white‐tailed deer suppression over thirty years","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Monographs","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Guelph; University of Waterloo","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Odocoileus; Understory; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology); Population; Biology; Species diversity; Plant community; Ecological succession; Canopy; Demography","score_opus":0.010302591364060091,"score_gpt":0.22767178953077458,"score_spread":0.2173691981667145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391323676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920211,0.00017705743,0.0003226809,0.0053443736,0.00032047016,0.00027965292,0.000012940493,0.00018554936,0.0013362095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909908,0.00007190826,0.00072032405,0.0069964514,0.00007449362,0.00009009974,0.00004539822,0.00003190648,0.0009786153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860746,0.0000656681,0.00017654794,0.0004718866,0.00036592578,0.00031250142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999468,0.00006191827,0.00006854942,0.00028542016,0.00001140374,0.00010469398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021666303,0.00019991283,0.00016044271,0.00012175596,0.0001509781,0.000079898244,0.0001869223,0.0001629194,0.0008955097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011273469,0.00016346412,0.0000705422,0.00062097976,0.00024188112,0.00043011547,0.00008945722,0.00021711564,0.00027826257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041782358,0.000036072757,0.9172166,0.000021352429,0.000037624846,0.000034478788,0.001706769,0.00019501365,0.00018694648,0.0000530257,0.076070584,0.004399727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030661174,0.00009590322,0.9720741,0.00010265387,0.00005269592,0.000012891759,0.00020134827,0.0029261874,0.0001536924,0.00030279096,0.02352544,0.00024567384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077747194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005755461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054857492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064438595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021896756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}