{"meta":{"query_hash":"9ec6b84e2c09","filters":{"venue":"Wildlife Research"},"cohort_total":160,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":160,"exported":160,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9ec6b84e2c09","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Wildlife+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1554781021","doi":"10.1071/wr14240","title":"Arctic ground squirrel population collapse in the boreal forests of the Southern Yukon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Parks Canada; Garfield Weston Foundation; Wildlife Conservation Society; Arctic Institute of North America","keywords":"Ecology; Predation; Taiga; Population; Herbivore; Habitat; Geography; Tundra; Occupancy; Arctic; Boreal; Context (archaeology); Biology","score_opus":0.0964816613140248,"score_gpt":0.33504695735291584,"score_spread":0.23856529603889104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554781021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99955314,0.00010544312,0.00001770667,0.000020616673,0.000001626115,0.0000018044533,0.00016036043,0.0000019910945,0.00013722452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938655,0.000100462676,0.00004257965,0.000018898028,0.0000016740194,0.0000027833792,0.00034979984,8.113114e-7,0.00009643037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998777,0.000015899888,0.000012873789,0.00003294263,0.000020511448,0.00004008929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971145,0.000017366181,0.00011703513,0.000013852131,0.000062800515,0.000077447105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020777549,0.00013922578,0.00015515847,0.0005338686,0.00050665304,0.0004014049,0.00022616594,0.00018249916,0.00050873205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003155109,0.00010771543,0.00018123777,0.0005299652,0.00033400176,0.0002919462,0.00041256307,0.00016181945,0.0000657678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002433102,0.000009105166,0.9966629,0.000018998471,0.000026293757,0.000098526914,0.00030991947,0.00006488661,0.0005825137,0.000018310353,0.00011691505,0.0020673214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.169352e-7,0.000011398696,0.99922395,0.0000041857065,0.0000061508836,0.000055238448,0.0004634543,0.000054820815,0.000025548274,0.00000685088,0.00014637005,0.0000011992926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16908537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.354795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8309146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001012989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008995445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33620238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602821691","doi":"10.1071/wr15001","title":"The temporal multimodal influence of optical and auditory cues on the repellent behavior of ring-billed gulls (Larus delewarensis)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bayer Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sensory cue; Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0997266170187767,"score_gpt":0.33716305209585884,"score_spread":0.23743643507708212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602821691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99900216,0.00026492396,0.00014098427,0.00003342601,0.000005297188,0.000009120081,0.00007191843,0.000013618616,0.00045858606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987877,0.00010816299,0.0003827842,0.00009412818,0.0000065599575,0.00003033039,0.000091347596,0.000007912441,0.0004911515],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998709,0.000022485583,0.000007053587,0.000035514495,0.000023807834,0.00004019839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982196,0.00004694121,0.00004628879,0.000008048897,0.000018321467,0.00005848484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009833139,0.00025564837,0.0003068621,0.00018002748,0.00012468404,0.00024506578,0.000116088915,0.00023512123,0.0014564367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019851536,0.0001373147,0.00014236559,0.000055164925,0.00028250288,0.0002366885,0.00027682298,0.00049181446,0.00015038418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005994683,0.000038176488,0.001861619,0.00005283042,0.0000067624733,0.000053444346,0.000034180608,0.00004395495,0.99526536,0.000015622838,0.000045499728,0.0019831047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006658374,0.0052391756,0.7348926,0.000026230497,0.00008756526,0.00036981553,0.00048528978,0.0011225035,0.25625753,0.00008750749,0.0013234342,0.000041835945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013781027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035093483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014564367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003246865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015894858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0048722625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901937181","doi":"10.1071/wr15038","title":"Performance of GPS collars on free-ranging bison (Bison bison) in north-western Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"Panthera","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Wildlife; Collar; Geography; Demography; Biology; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.058278633993834046,"score_gpt":0.29143144502169405,"score_spread":0.23315281102786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901937181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976151,0.0002729629,0.00021147523,0.000021132553,0.000005130873,0.000014138019,0.00055896287,0.000011633322,0.0012895607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956613,0.00034330806,0.0010089298,0.000041434734,0.00000288511,0.000013195619,0.00095694285,0.000012300162,0.0019596766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994747,0.000048499678,0.000020203795,0.00011677443,0.00022900706,0.00011074237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984432,0.0001267895,0.00031335518,0.00005787148,0.0007473783,0.00031142143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052220345,0.0005403401,0.00032716763,0.0012294515,0.0013596208,0.00076059083,0.00079761416,0.00026130065,0.0015269628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014331642,0.0002504932,0.00015196564,0.0014822693,0.00087507075,0.00030093463,0.0007127584,0.00020725965,0.0004928553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010991167,0.000028120337,0.9786718,0.00005682501,0.00005227971,0.00012206731,0.0030644275,0.00024581098,0.0031032877,0.000053592114,0.00054250145,0.013949369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010189891,0.00003509282,0.997928,0.000011538838,0.000010795972,0.000044938497,0.0010920322,0.00013461962,0.0001778054,0.00000873526,0.0005488043,0.000006589358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9138598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086140215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005381251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030258736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17329496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965622485","doi":"10.1071/wr11051","title":"Harbouring pests: rabbit warrens in agricultural landscapes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Agriculture; Geography; Agroforestry; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.10096265794183498,"score_gpt":0.31192155921725034,"score_spread":0.21095890127541536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965622485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993286,0.00017972496,0.00016024784,0.000010635193,8.9923043e-7,0.0000033395047,0.0000631246,0.0000044655344,0.00024896004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936146,0.00010834605,0.00030033564,0.000006875217,0.0000032593973,0.000004199422,0.00010952455,0.0000015398418,0.00010463792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948657,0.00011177139,0.000043711072,0.00020618497,0.00007587798,0.00007578483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873,0.00025922825,0.00079885963,0.00007106113,0.000054216893,0.00008670042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048705627,0.00020213753,0.00035170492,0.00086864666,0.0002846612,0.0006525546,0.00025689937,0.00030382958,0.0010325674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011663284,0.00011626517,0.0002761055,0.000926497,0.00066757016,0.00037470864,0.0005782058,0.00018300886,0.00013029159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008282865,0.000038423655,0.98933476,0.000071037284,0.00004458366,0.00021722737,0.00037012142,0.00032879307,0.003077153,0.000060576785,0.000049705795,0.006324819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016605876,0.00005934264,0.9989717,0.0000072487096,0.000011974979,0.00015065848,0.0002543588,0.00029846313,0.00005244857,0.00004319963,0.00014696018,0.000002002415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007179383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022198848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007179383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034965755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017053129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014275193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973067932","doi":"10.1071/wr13090","title":"Evaluation of predator-exclusion cages used in turtle conservation: cost analysis and effects on nest environment and proxies of hatchling fitness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Hatchling; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Turtle (robot); Predation; Ecology; Chelydra; Predator; Context (archaeology); Nest box; Painted turtle; Hatching; Zoology; Fishery","score_opus":0.05873463479451411,"score_gpt":0.3301222129980049,"score_spread":0.2713875782034908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973067932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99874276,0.00015732877,0.0005346256,0.000013933274,0.0000035891298,0.00005616529,0.00025283505,0.000012728599,0.0002260868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965571,0.00008494472,0.002621387,0.000016736532,0.000004100146,0.00009057388,0.00035001858,0.0000063508783,0.00026874468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850476,0.000595225,0.00015824097,0.00021456872,0.0004486567,0.00007863639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379236,0.0017283458,0.0026007837,0.00040486146,0.0010711717,0.0004025338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017178039,0.00044192877,0.00032809906,0.00068853,0.00031968876,0.00052076863,0.00042210228,0.0002478021,0.000649736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036310474,0.0001562214,0.0004454846,0.00038469382,0.00032604762,0.0003391999,0.00029266017,0.00016156706,0.00008339458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004053173,0.00083140767,0.9191079,0.00032668494,0.00048634544,0.00012033195,0.0002803739,0.002554363,0.03806638,0.00007411584,0.00026090592,0.033838037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003138285,0.002619636,0.98907334,0.000019747591,0.00013915748,0.00007075905,0.00012059671,0.0025754082,0.0050780326,0.000013452092,0.00024665933,0.000011808671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011428937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057083726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011428937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001411346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005736494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022724867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973828764","doi":"10.1071/wr10173","title":"Does ‘acoustic anchoring’ reduce post-translocation dispersal of North Island robins?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Context (archaeology); Population; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.07863541845144163,"score_gpt":0.35330425016911227,"score_spread":0.27466883171767065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973828764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99901557,0.00022437239,0.0002359721,0.00017323857,0.000016953347,0.000013688776,0.000018294473,0.000013265781,0.00028873383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983442,0.00018679538,0.00093973166,0.00009788353,0.000023772342,0.00002960743,0.000036283633,0.0000068190147,0.00033493602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958116,0.00019436552,0.000024827685,0.000099678226,0.00004581957,0.000054197524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987128,0.00029216945,0.0005310472,0.00012077648,0.00007675073,0.00026655963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006314351,0.00020692537,0.0003157164,0.00010194033,0.00022547483,0.0002870333,0.00038392076,0.0005158109,0.0015390804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027635007,0.00012485501,0.00015010223,0.00006317248,0.000558333,0.00037385797,0.00030889327,0.0003465495,0.00021445524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016960386,0.0073096585,0.4600377,0.0010569973,0.00063978933,0.00086387503,0.002599292,0.001490016,0.25599226,0.0005346277,0.0026018417,0.24991353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001881881,0.016555011,0.971788,0.00005892657,0.00017607244,0.00031387256,0.0014624521,0.0012257294,0.005528606,0.00025064446,0.0024310108,0.000021530515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028713115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074860845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028713115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020664815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003027779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005709231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978697009","doi":"10.1071/wr07035","title":"The importance of grasstrees (Xanthorrhoea preissii) as habitat for mardo (Antechinus flavipes leucogaster) during post-fire recovery","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Murdoch University","keywords":"Biology; Snag; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Fauna; Habitat; Foraging; Prescribed burn; Wildlife conservation","score_opus":0.023484372285250226,"score_gpt":0.31803159838314016,"score_spread":0.2945472260978899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978697009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997259,0.000048219346,0.000016028502,0.0000061297,5.3578094e-7,0.0000018490498,0.000020012749,7.652416e-7,0.0001806689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950993,0.000053414507,0.00013629653,0.000007893532,0.0000014342501,0.0000035181129,0.000048659145,6.9928836e-7,0.00023818098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998524,0.000023438697,0.000008902199,0.000039948514,0.00003235481,0.000042934018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999529,0.00004871556,0.00022968727,0.000022936318,0.000056271183,0.000113352326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023588557,0.00015149052,0.00020922655,0.00047991352,0.0006015369,0.00050682743,0.00029083304,0.00027690612,0.00071192137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006165234,0.00015837791,0.0001346087,0.00024897128,0.0003972413,0.00040437488,0.0005701929,0.00035180597,0.00014288918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017448359,0.00008707983,0.94046015,0.000074229814,0.00003294148,0.00074110384,0.0038954709,0.00008482333,0.03991795,0.000058145753,0.000084106825,0.014389538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.3072286e-7,0.000041853084,0.9991798,0.000002547548,0.000002829339,0.00011933618,0.00039445856,0.000023001958,0.00013483466,0.0000039926076,0.00009570568,0.000001300039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0084646195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051789556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0084646195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045022243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019126691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016830742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979437213","doi":"10.1071/wr08165","title":"Shedding new light on old species identifications: morphological and genetic evidence suggest a need for conservation status review of the critically endangered bat, Saccolaimus saccolaimus","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Endangered species; Critically endangered; Biology; Biodiversity; Conservation status; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Ecology; Species complex; Conservation genetics; Microsatellite","score_opus":0.11569465486856283,"score_gpt":0.35082205434971225,"score_spread":0.2351273994811494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979437213","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059080277,0.7256285,0.012468017,0.14859311,0.017830057,0.00016387226,0.0008457331,0.0003910328,0.034999445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25625196,0.6379816,0.033490837,0.045303315,0.0122965295,0.00015368573,0.0018812452,0.0003178338,0.01232302],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531245,0.0012682282,0.0010035047,0.00084597827,0.0013616709,0.00020814914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942385,0.02563552,0.006248495,0.0029851266,0.02086464,0.0018812097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010731867,0.00048179348,0.0008249697,0.00640647,0.001837715,0.0046412027,0.0022342145,0.0020518436,0.0049970564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029123988,0.00044631708,0.00058787595,0.0033497754,0.0055023683,0.011891394,0.0017752986,0.0038448772,0.001704845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066557644,0.000053759675,0.03008189,0.0076220143,0.00012912643,0.0010891864,0.0071296687,0.00025090962,0.0058689853,0.0076186783,0.06565906,0.8744302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006057439,0.00011437148,0.09099705,0.015371789,0.00016538447,0.0030260375,0.014516781,0.00038186417,0.0009617145,0.009615458,0.8647346,0.00010887332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011279036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033946086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011279036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018614447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004391021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0567562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981176202","doi":"10.1071/wr14223","title":"Anthropogenic stressors influence small mammal communities in tropical East African savanna at multiple spatial scales","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Zoologische Gesellschaft Frankfurt","keywords":"Ecosystem; Ecology; Species richness; Habitat; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem health; Ecosystem diversity; Context (archaeology); Biology","score_opus":0.09792184551721872,"score_gpt":0.31701427753928524,"score_spread":0.21909243202206652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981176202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99963915,0.000074061274,0.000021284879,0.000017193284,9.38576e-7,0.000002675333,0.000052930875,9.687715e-7,0.00019074141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99980396,0.00006096246,0.000039667248,0.0000066069347,0.0000018961128,0.0000029522578,0.000035105582,4.0228986e-7,0.000048519312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998417,0.000050923245,0.000007760333,0.00003103547,0.000016582793,0.00005200448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947816,0.00007885753,0.00024605627,0.000022535132,0.000043870736,0.00013059752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023823259,0.00018261388,0.00014403637,0.0008827128,0.00051516993,0.0004547399,0.00019668741,0.00016690722,0.0016758619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010268971,0.00011976132,0.00013557999,0.0006947453,0.00061957084,0.00050705846,0.0006520004,0.00016485357,0.00012499593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046655518,0.000020271693,0.99199367,0.00003135355,0.000029526664,0.0001903192,0.0013539083,0.00013802036,0.002193137,0.00003920278,0.00008235491,0.0038816174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.202331e-7,0.000014417985,0.9988159,0.0000057528705,0.0000036928298,0.000050846018,0.0008687214,0.00009793511,0.000031874173,0.000019389294,0.000089729176,0.0000012149426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012955359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03443077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012955359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034346335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024745715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025759935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982099321","doi":"10.1071/wr07167","title":"A bait-suspension device for the control of feral cats","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Feral cat; Invasive species; Introduced species; Biology; Ecology; Pest control; Wildlife conservation; Fauna; Habitat; Predation; Felis catus","score_opus":0.12786144224795667,"score_gpt":0.4505916087037491,"score_spread":0.32273016645579244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982099321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920848,0.0018939286,0.0036773568,0.00019850861,0.00003521513,0.000200156,0.00009410836,0.000046678546,0.0017691471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857905,0.0012938261,0.0111178495,0.000069663285,0.000018238417,0.00007381369,0.00014520073,0.0000038590756,0.0014870162],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977916,0.0000638719,0.000015221833,0.000040171213,0.00008107313,0.000020452588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99988544,0.000032754204,0.000025525816,0.0000090636495,0.00002253694,0.000024708332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058319926,0.00021914368,0.0002932638,0.00057830167,0.00041755708,0.00022080562,0.00029909806,0.0003198796,0.0012698325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004745803,0.00010321299,0.00022617911,0.00017199332,0.00025652564,0.00025736223,0.0001656065,0.00020332982,0.00017470868],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015328969,0.0012718267,0.031113585,0.0004902088,0.00009127904,0.0004588648,0.0003651862,0.00034443077,0.8241195,0.0005550382,0.0007796792,0.13887748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036884152,0.050805636,0.36645278,0.00014873316,0.00031255695,0.004415737,0.000426639,0.005631493,0.55372053,0.00030809693,0.017345892,0.000063122134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028949552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00623353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028949552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003304336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000245009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0057561994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983861488","doi":"10.1071/wr06140","title":"Increasing the target-specificity of ERADICAT® for feral cat (Felis catus) control by encapsulating a toxicant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Toxicant; Pellet; Biology; Felis catus; Feral cat; Toxicology; CATS; Felis; Zoology; Animal science; Ecology; Veterinary medicine; Predation; Toxicity; Chemistry; Medicine","score_opus":0.03154881625757824,"score_gpt":0.3585682800367027,"score_spread":0.3270194637791245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983861488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975235,0.0004439252,0.0007562031,0.000059950824,0.000007224794,0.000027333519,0.00003034572,0.000020714795,0.0011308838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479127,0.00038141184,0.0024712188,0.000075129734,0.000004711847,0.000031233783,0.00011962211,0.0000066174944,0.002118875],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975604,0.000039300972,0.000016824415,0.00006160204,0.00009218037,0.00003418033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997906,0.000034229954,0.000077731915,0.000011332248,0.000055548997,0.00003057872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034473406,0.00023907654,0.000267002,0.0003105969,0.0001277911,0.00042958322,0.00027520722,0.00033638516,0.0017115966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027982998,0.00011988768,0.00015391363,0.000088984474,0.0002526052,0.0002663341,0.00025977718,0.00022258777,0.00022911646],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025278618,0.00016802584,0.009282469,0.00015832449,0.000028485838,0.000083635074,0.000061306426,0.00019108709,0.97489196,0.00006736,0.00008976722,0.0147249065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008834263,0.008788924,0.23360969,0.000090838694,0.00014416596,0.0011375474,0.00031093135,0.0045002676,0.7443569,0.00006992284,0.0068807285,0.000021709664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002714158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073117022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002714158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037437034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024774706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00572592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985521129","doi":"10.1071/wr05031","title":"Summer survey of dugong distribution and abundance in Shark Bay reveals additional key habitat area","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Geography; Population; Habitat; Fishery; Abundance (ecology); Reef; Wildlife management; Aerial survey; Ecology; Oceanography; Biology; Geology; Demography","score_opus":0.0746871981669621,"score_gpt":0.3246499834559679,"score_spread":0.2499627852890058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985521129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985556,0.000054169184,0.000055556673,0.000022292046,0.0000018895636,0.000009306365,0.0003810993,0.000007655369,0.0009123728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971233,0.00013316552,0.000439931,0.000029571334,0.0000042991687,0.000020038584,0.00077509193,0.0000023115872,0.0014722976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989843,0.000017464907,0.0000093837325,0.00002932927,0.000018529838,0.0000269082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997365,0.000018882556,0.00009794819,0.000012751986,0.000057082405,0.000076787495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014927099,0.00013281073,0.000109672656,0.00070927315,0.00025666997,0.00017853566,0.00015036152,0.00011803699,0.0012247786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022410398,0.00012063836,0.000102052174,0.00058261474,0.00014928663,0.00016316261,0.00027713063,0.00013401393,0.00021363178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058249865,0.000023042589,0.9810998,0.000038272596,0.000012639463,0.00012317816,0.00085521303,0.00005788416,0.003383593,0.000024392219,0.00049502443,0.013828639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.415438e-7,0.000029730776,0.9990884,0.0000029601665,0.0000014214688,0.000044937362,0.00028238675,0.00002493962,0.000042307205,0.0000028843397,0.00047864052,6.727792e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034057066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13662432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034057066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035742234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033863285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06771767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990305143","doi":"10.1071/wr09070","title":"Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fraser Health","funders":"University of Otago; Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation","keywords":"Threatened species; Feral cat; Geography; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Rural area; Protected area; Population; Endangered species; Ecology; Habitat; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.02941831063923507,"score_gpt":0.30557230043170674,"score_spread":0.2761539897924717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990305143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862031,0.0038932108,0.0008017509,0.004233998,0.000027116,0.000033834644,0.00021885584,0.000013327421,0.004574811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829143,0.0006821373,0.00043667175,0.00019210773,0.000014322209,0.0000143727675,0.000056528603,0.000002130992,0.00031032998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995454,0.00015590215,0.000018865914,0.00008041857,0.00006400616,0.00013549678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986243,0.00022988788,0.00042750398,0.00004552186,0.00012545219,0.0005473162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007652117,0.00021952222,0.00025171757,0.00053450436,0.0009958256,0.0016060048,0.00083626766,0.00079267396,0.003307958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021956635,0.00016997756,0.00016454028,0.00043222134,0.002360369,0.0013897404,0.0019507637,0.00044440408,0.00025127205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036520418,0.0001515607,0.8923436,0.00079796195,0.00010491577,0.002344114,0.015784541,0.0004071401,0.003322092,0.0043505193,0.00339079,0.076637484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016097549,0.00017519586,0.93276393,0.00030736957,0.000060172086,0.0022987362,0.044443328,0.00038745624,0.00028506987,0.0022263578,0.0170097,0.00002659089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016414607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047879893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016414607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011364017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090041966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032638133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990333528","doi":"10.1071/wr09111","title":"Detecting, but not affecting, nest-box occupancy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Murdoch University","keywords":"Nest box; Nest (protein structural motif); Occupancy; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Brushtail possum; Biology; Environmental science; Predation","score_opus":0.04066627592238788,"score_gpt":0.3319678287490373,"score_spread":0.29130155282664943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990333528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945634,0.00022310464,0.002532529,0.000017976514,0.000026158994,0.000051650135,0.00042375913,0.00009388448,0.0020675084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930688,0.000093879295,0.0047999527,0.00007632413,0.000011424738,0.00012721191,0.0004355876,0.00002519537,0.0013616113],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996238,0.00006235097,0.000018335348,0.00018093975,0.00008397789,0.00003060457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880016,0.00031947336,0.0004984783,0.0001242941,0.00014278089,0.000114746486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031856913,0.00043316133,0.00028198084,0.00021052484,0.000197984,0.00036394122,0.0004248935,0.00030380642,0.0019187571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014020089,0.00017278231,0.00017453251,0.00012270044,0.00031123628,0.00028305716,0.0003507466,0.00030294133,0.00043793014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096899486,0.00020657256,0.44194847,0.0004522186,0.00016474143,0.00033403168,0.0005680447,0.0006672722,0.49394688,0.0000833689,0.0005936481,0.0600657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007366273,0.0007542837,0.9634478,0.00003113402,0.00007161285,0.00031874058,0.00015095963,0.0010278715,0.032978956,0.000027375916,0.0011703037,0.000013549128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023428046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012119262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023428046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023508113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017296214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006418884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992331963","doi":"10.1071/wr11106","title":"Choosing cost-effective locations for conservation fences in the local landscape","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Australian Government","keywords":"Exclosure; Fence (mathematics); Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Wildlife management; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Wildlife; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.32879011042366046,"score_gpt":0.3606483256875823,"score_spread":0.03185821526392185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992331963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6759131,0.0003463918,0.3093257,0.000823272,0.00002234053,0.0010853611,0.00035308572,0.00046690775,0.011663931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69782686,0.00011577421,0.30013558,0.000061406354,0.0000055795076,0.0003934516,0.0001988276,0.00005449523,0.0012080724],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984861,0.0007069883,0.00008840613,0.00031116436,0.00020529651,0.00020202466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971846,0.0017607477,0.00039198075,0.00018523842,0.0002456174,0.00023184215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028818196,0.00090966077,0.0008658668,0.0015840379,0.0008883804,0.0028453954,0.001794845,0.0013821832,0.006271364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065399157,0.00054066104,0.000822134,0.00086559,0.0009226903,0.0016127027,0.001739944,0.0009312313,0.0004035031],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044153593,0.0007423219,0.042992212,0.0008648936,0.00022282958,0.00081371714,0.001321434,0.73171693,0.011918993,0.016662082,0.0020469523,0.19025607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016986391,0.000933662,0.013059759,0.0002483191,0.00023654112,0.00032425544,0.0041125463,0.9485384,0.0060698832,0.020349512,0.005820928,0.00013637838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004640809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015754454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006271364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019801501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030865695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020979822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993548293","doi":"10.1071/wr03105","title":"The contribution of spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus) to the transmission of Echinococcus granulosus in the Byadbo Wilderness Area, Kosciuszko National Park, Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Parasitic infections in humans and animals","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; University of Salford Manchester","keywords":"Echinococcus granulosus; Biology; Wildlife; Zoology; Ecology; Animal ecology; Fauna","score_opus":0.11010987442233816,"score_gpt":0.439760091707996,"score_spread":0.32965021728565785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993548293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999275,0.000020145268,0.0000045091597,0.000003187034,3.0481897e-7,9.780792e-7,0.000007216985,2.173475e-7,0.000035909263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998288,0.00003317789,0.000034869354,0.000006945217,0.0000013652045,0.0000017964369,0.000028269398,2.64166e-7,0.000064482294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998398,0.000042181357,0.0000124074595,0.000030815427,0.00002838785,0.000046393565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995258,0.00007277552,0.00019926453,0.000023443064,0.0000514365,0.00012727172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020891576,0.00023537895,0.00012974003,0.00056402094,0.0003947201,0.00030646505,0.00015597834,0.00024421557,0.0006715677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007187716,0.00017052854,0.00007192204,0.00017329447,0.00054412015,0.00018145927,0.00033956376,0.00017480932,0.00011756126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015090505,0.00005253671,0.9819515,0.000017904418,0.000020318026,0.0003881482,0.0007174342,0.000032490603,0.014350375,0.000021619251,0.00003288234,0.002263947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002308208,0.00012739492,0.9985545,0.0000030463495,0.0000052815867,0.00050364074,0.00046774952,0.00006241855,0.00021715209,0.000008330651,0.00004665188,0.0000014866855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079651745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01715699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079651745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023839007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001443866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01583761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994123841","doi":"10.1071/wr11105","title":"Assessment of bias in US waterfowl harvest estimates","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Goose; Branta; Geography; Context (archaeology); Anatidae; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Archaeology","score_opus":0.4965470248049577,"score_gpt":0.5373102824956577,"score_spread":0.040763257690699994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994123841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9100591,0.009123323,0.062563546,0.002214593,0.00045771262,0.00045555359,0.0058931904,0.00029367703,0.00893942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98189056,0.0007354653,0.014070713,0.00074871053,0.00012376606,0.00026024066,0.0017382145,0.00004575966,0.00038663106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9460443,0.032000523,0.007044907,0.0048064757,0.009155865,0.00094801886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8388612,0.08545853,0.04049174,0.011874621,0.02262914,0.00068480114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07091466,0.00057623733,0.0005477831,0.002965952,0.0006819125,0.0013091356,0.000984159,0.00056843285,0.000972891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18159392,0.0003371268,0.000879011,0.004149007,0.0010755407,0.0010790578,0.0019736052,0.00062136294,0.00019228579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014043288,0.000017055721,0.9535664,0.00032880748,0.0009230702,0.000068329355,0.0015136292,0.0012199514,0.00031964126,0.0010397001,0.0019706008,0.038892314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022214947,0.00014040119,0.97438747,0.00052373635,0.00054559455,0.00041837094,0.0010593631,0.005030319,0.0015653663,0.0033022424,0.012946896,0.000058050966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020936832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01818727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07091466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016472733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016195809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37503707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996414013","doi":"10.1071/wr05021","title":"Estimating the abundance of eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) in south-eastern New South Wales, Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Transect; Aerial survey; Abundance (ecology); Population; Wildlife management; Population density; Wildlife; Forestry; Fishery; Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.06708750562672058,"score_gpt":0.3245256465723542,"score_spread":0.25743814094563366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996414013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979225,0.000078048266,0.00027215114,0.000021120926,0.0000015997184,0.0000509509,0.00017085003,0.000005883007,0.0014770047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959157,0.00016853012,0.0017703688,0.000031390453,0.0000026552807,0.00007170656,0.0002931301,0.0000031934096,0.0017433347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997787,0.000043029144,0.000024263913,0.000054744378,0.0000679063,0.00003132928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995585,0.000053767,0.0001420297,0.000023617658,0.00011826951,0.00010379141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003601414,0.00021547021,0.00014527404,0.0010108573,0.0004133492,0.0002860667,0.00034718524,0.00017667151,0.00081580546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006917792,0.00027127485,0.00016931209,0.00051098096,0.00037737068,0.00044253413,0.0006580383,0.0001791704,0.0003174625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007334923,0.000048585018,0.9686534,0.00011911093,0.00004526118,0.00045203374,0.0027456614,0.00045261133,0.01074791,0.00006640468,0.00037295112,0.016222632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018592843,0.000050030798,0.9983109,0.0000102671165,0.000005499487,0.00009395001,0.0005920628,0.00028813476,0.00013846853,0.000016073642,0.00048988126,0.0000029670673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12512438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42850748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12512438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089774135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005176851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24879217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996699596","doi":"10.1071/wr05057","title":"Home range and den characteristics of the brush-tailed rabbit-rat (Conilurus penicillatus) in the monsoonal tropics of the Northern Territory, Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Home range; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Ecology; Tropics; Geography; Floristics; Diameter at breast height; Forestry; Species richness","score_opus":0.032957787635656974,"score_gpt":0.2794786409986995,"score_spread":0.24652085336304252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996699596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979633,0.0000283746,0.000021178816,0.000002936712,3.1526562e-7,0.0000017308188,0.00003277832,7.2436e-7,0.000115617266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957174,0.000036505302,0.00007100066,0.0000063756142,9.1952234e-7,0.0000034396255,0.00010024985,5.3454704e-7,0.00020924032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998971,0.0000150391525,0.000009638017,0.000034176614,0.00002336442,0.000020582449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966145,0.000033116576,0.00014804781,0.00002048383,0.000045370103,0.00009154233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001922277,0.00016349401,0.00017621188,0.00058054307,0.00022532717,0.0002272138,0.0001649649,0.00014652654,0.00061974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003218987,0.00017516171,0.00016465737,0.00029987612,0.00034585624,0.00021154986,0.0002832783,0.00013314588,0.00015718861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007284331,0.00004001691,0.9879848,0.000016250344,0.000031303975,0.00016416525,0.00094883563,0.00006102454,0.0073741963,0.000012013742,0.000051714953,0.0032429574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.4976783e-7,0.000024698185,0.99974173,7.0257664e-7,0.0000016655947,0.00005713962,0.00009165259,0.00002789486,0.000032127922,0.0000011123667,0.000020138797,5.8317687e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038429286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12792975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038429286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036053814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013100557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07641119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997809727","doi":"10.1071/wr04089","title":"Factors affecting the detection of possums by spotlighting in Western Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Geography; Brushtail possum; Aerial survey; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Forestry; Vegetation (pathology); Eucalyptus; Physical geography; Biology; Marsupial; Cartography","score_opus":0.08095376978242817,"score_gpt":0.3499750825913329,"score_spread":0.26902131280890473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997809727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996357,0.000033529544,0.000046808516,0.000009230998,7.7899296e-7,0.0000030810238,0.000012898419,9.384931e-7,0.00025686636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996039,0.000056988792,0.00010924628,0.000009361129,0.0000014786644,0.000004422006,0.00002955784,9.3610976e-7,0.00018413109],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957925,0.00010532979,0.000037567923,0.00008970659,0.00012124009,0.00006704779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987779,0.00018851997,0.0006178597,0.00004545641,0.000207039,0.00016320318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004016227,0.0001543672,0.00014350268,0.0004808295,0.000388312,0.00039453575,0.00021722252,0.00015453582,0.00061589846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001627256,0.00021721881,0.00013015314,0.00041289552,0.0005181933,0.0003852788,0.00051486876,0.00017782804,0.00011151583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047557274,0.000017467286,0.98439264,0.00003080357,0.00001821344,0.00024268588,0.002211194,0.00006821835,0.0068739695,0.000018863526,0.000052438678,0.006025921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.6984566e-7,0.000022149978,0.99937385,0.0000021421545,0.000002480352,0.000059541962,0.00036646237,0.00003645817,0.000059900318,0.000003469177,0.00007223848,0.0000011435692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053304095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15221459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053304095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005134196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040620466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10598767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999098784","doi":"10.1071/wr07071","title":"Effects of drought on weight, survival and breeding success of agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis), dusky antechinus (A. swainsonii) and bush rats (Rattus fuscipes)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Seasonal breeder","score_opus":0.019472867929869398,"score_gpt":0.2964306213737513,"score_spread":0.2769577534438819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999098784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99990356,0.000023497842,0.000008440205,0.0000017427152,4.14266e-7,6.01446e-7,0.000014150802,5.150051e-7,0.000047111705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997253,0.00003509291,0.000050243594,0.0000068948143,0.0000013200083,0.0000032706496,0.00005142082,5.2706076e-7,0.00012597386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994206,0.000014703429,0.0000044305957,0.000013789627,0.000009937278,0.000015156124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997433,0.000033863456,0.00010155729,0.000010607156,0.000021255613,0.000089464906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013780908,0.00015702772,0.0001477477,0.0002523953,0.00016250367,0.00016115027,0.000093669136,0.00009456338,0.00060009095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030262666,0.00010409673,0.00009540855,0.00013045383,0.00015955156,0.00012655734,0.00018982778,0.00017315702,0.00007840147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012653563,0.000413742,0.9008463,0.000067994886,0.00015290931,0.0003588946,0.0006516059,0.00019378256,0.07667644,0.000048543363,0.00014695246,0.019177414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001974602,0.0002750052,0.99923885,0.0000010816768,0.0000075731987,0.000052396295,0.000061291365,0.00005270461,0.00025485666,0.0000055875203,0.000047433175,0.0000012262489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039298725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013395124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039298725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018313313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091619986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00781399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999129668","doi":"10.1071/wr12184","title":"Spatial relationships of sympatric wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (C. latrans) with woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) during the calving season in a human-modified boreal landscape","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Canis; Predation; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Population; Ursus; Bog; Context (archaeology); Boreal; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.026123599569093676,"score_gpt":0.26140295979494055,"score_spread":0.23527936022584686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999129668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997621,0.0000401816,0.00001368211,0.0000046087703,5.571198e-7,0.0000011064001,0.00006762116,9.648428e-7,0.000109172535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964404,0.00002912316,0.000051442636,0.0000042938477,8.7975786e-7,0.0000018711905,0.00011879546,4.3299252e-7,0.00014903133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998629,0.000018046247,0.000009780053,0.00003990149,0.000028500868,0.00004088998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999468,0.000058812246,0.00020775922,0.000026476846,0.00009739567,0.00014152269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019774646,0.00013824394,0.00011848208,0.00056908856,0.00040050835,0.00040928158,0.000332065,0.00019592934,0.0006537838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006129859,0.00017285597,0.000095389536,0.0004995855,0.00035543268,0.00014993301,0.00030652466,0.0001461197,0.00008299973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001570878,0.000009896222,0.9982535,0.0000029282376,0.000013478155,0.00002762849,0.00029634076,0.000045379886,0.00033881638,0.000007876071,0.00005849799,0.0009299577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.991592e-7,0.000006181482,0.99963045,0.0000015693025,0.0000028984655,0.000024206769,0.00024004572,0.000044228178,0.000014194141,0.0000021136836,0.000033076794,5.6564375e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3844984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7707355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3844984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007800808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047270526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7645207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999418935","doi":"10.1071/wr05024","title":"Comparison of the healing process in hot and cold brands applied to harbour seal pups (Phoca vitulina)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Meat and Animal Product Quality","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Phoca; Cold war; Seal (emblem); Biology; Fishery; Geography","score_opus":0.11844878223096522,"score_gpt":0.38899520936735327,"score_spread":0.27054642713638805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999418935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99911875,0.0002848353,0.00022049525,0.000007876255,0.000007898158,0.0000118983835,0.000035709636,0.0000031404093,0.0003094772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726844,0.0003365994,0.0009377734,0.000035663365,0.000009751746,0.000021365706,0.00010733773,0.0000068395793,0.0012761758],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984944,0.00001971958,0.0000113271135,0.000044624347,0.00003880833,0.000036042216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966335,0.00007092974,0.00013100234,0.00002496654,0.000053391283,0.00005639609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029948898,0.00018953497,0.00019094767,0.00030485357,0.00020077852,0.00019255806,0.00013154332,0.00031892557,0.000990187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003906506,0.00016988406,0.00032910344,0.000093529015,0.0003568296,0.00029088877,0.00023687092,0.00047071782,0.00014566228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090074516,0.00008342698,0.011408681,0.00009044003,0.000021527001,0.00028388028,0.0002712126,0.000093306815,0.98263353,0.00006702153,0.00003441793,0.0041117514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003067976,0.012310017,0.51524574,0.00004339068,0.00012846196,0.0015520739,0.0015839082,0.0007900109,0.4656553,0.00014479543,0.0024846175,0.0000310441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005619796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010403675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.000990187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015775154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011320048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0033124685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000661016","doi":"10.1071/wr04094","title":"A comparison of survey methods for arboreal possums in jarrah forest, Western Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Eucalyptus; Brushtail possum; Biology; Ecology; Marsupial; Habitat","score_opus":0.29619080126970293,"score_gpt":0.5269645016899436,"score_spread":0.23077370042024065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000661016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966876,0.0006363102,0.0012615949,0.000040209216,0.0000065967633,0.00012271418,0.00009201445,0.000019001985,0.001133833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816207,0.000924188,0.015493908,0.000055534336,0.000010274827,0.00020791135,0.00034621995,0.000012303235,0.0013288554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969927,0.0015965729,0.00020642586,0.0003239999,0.0007376429,0.00014263972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948926,0.0018778725,0.0011407754,0.00024117636,0.0015208126,0.00032674195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038755399,0.00034523578,0.0002914498,0.001445097,0.00038313726,0.00038366648,0.0005023037,0.0002492033,0.0005243179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006304239,0.00039811153,0.00032700924,0.00064433285,0.0002816772,0.00051355397,0.000588413,0.0001669615,0.0002079949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020430244,0.00037649696,0.76426685,0.0011449464,0.00029868467,0.00023951204,0.0070969574,0.00082544266,0.041281655,0.000103033766,0.00044371808,0.18187971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003549519,0.0010242915,0.99375546,0.00004903225,0.00005510752,0.00025879894,0.00073211285,0.0016218425,0.0014868571,0.000018008375,0.0009435422,0.0000193306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030454054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14712577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99612445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008802413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059072813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06055355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003349472","doi":"10.1071/wr03072","title":"Use of infrared digital cameras to investigate the behaviour of cryptic species","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Carnivore; Endangered species; Species complex; National park; Ecology; Geography; Biodiversity; Remote sensing; Biology","score_opus":0.09926182664020801,"score_gpt":0.30849934594904715,"score_spread":0.20923751930883916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003349472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450306,0.003173417,0.03603337,0.00017569192,0.00008070795,0.00022110742,0.0005509967,0.00012795898,0.014606186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.890218,0.0024441718,0.10086743,0.0003276103,0.000042989865,0.00015918535,0.00047701964,0.00002519514,0.0054384205],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977344,0.000047674203,0.00001183556,0.00006984496,0.00007050348,0.000026696784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994399,0.00018312258,0.00012547085,0.000048410566,0.00014432037,0.000058856876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039566512,0.0002980451,0.00014945355,0.0011503821,0.0002535571,0.0002823381,0.00035541118,0.00029671172,0.0011321494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006066996,0.00013986955,0.00013930773,0.0004599848,0.00023375574,0.0003712925,0.00038078535,0.00039993587,0.0002922202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054513064,0.0002834943,0.1586881,0.00073655124,0.00010248295,0.00068445,0.0010746581,0.0014022441,0.5828588,0.0007014568,0.0008477831,0.2520748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006850068,0.0025137397,0.7425901,0.00021285066,0.00024492864,0.005700304,0.0019902147,0.008677652,0.21864465,0.00072258984,0.0185196,0.00011482214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015652344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041143233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015652344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021714302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012163638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003787458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007640618","doi":"10.1071/wr02028","title":"How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Threatened species; Selection (genetic algorithm); Wildlife conservation; Ecological trap; Wildlife management; Wildlife; Foraging; Umbrella species; Biodiversity; Allee effect; Population; Metapopulation; Conservation biology; Optimal foraging theory; Biological dispersal; Biology","score_opus":0.028113851365260786,"score_gpt":0.2843409017106272,"score_spread":0.2562270503453664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007640618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016881112,0.11281362,0.28744832,0.48958832,0.010055824,0.00019797601,0.0005588115,0.00047071994,0.081985384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5053703,0.17454606,0.15062186,0.12071124,0.022399994,0.0011562818,0.0007424594,0.00037431635,0.024077473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99417734,0.0035770535,0.00019171601,0.00061503804,0.0009001953,0.000538562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797881,0.015189167,0.0010603055,0.0015137072,0.0016200449,0.00082870113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015035967,0.002505983,0.004597116,0.0044462853,0.001996919,0.008081787,0.0070498455,0.007117158,0.010102057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04281006,0.0009301711,0.0019554854,0.004030969,0.020179411,0.024258437,0.0049270955,0.009828231,0.0026633055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004263608,0.000091260554,0.0027897805,0.00049119315,0.00022509748,0.00017822816,0.00051908323,0.017929973,0.00005957031,0.89219666,0.016688133,0.06878832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078244875,0.000013222933,0.00027031396,0.00007513253,0.000007895082,0.000024637979,0.00018331764,0.003027632,0.000017326603,0.98593485,0.010420182,0.000017484677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011855338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062729274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015035967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005208837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025896144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079518795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009766541","doi":"10.1071/wr14050","title":"Responses of red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi) to windrows of woody debris along forest–clearcut edges","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clearcutting; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Debris; Habitat; Coarse woody debris; Population; Context (archaeology); Environmental science; Logging; Forest management; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.048471570730324036,"score_gpt":0.3216072904469489,"score_spread":0.27313571971662487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009766541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988055,0.000011950993,0.000007310639,0.000002248547,4.1923636e-7,0.0000010822796,0.000023267487,3.7947447e-7,0.00007271655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997806,0.000012881676,0.000026412154,0.000011571003,7.5159465e-7,0.0000029037317,0.00006776313,2.7050982e-7,0.000096935306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990463,0.00001724953,0.000004066816,0.00003747511,0.0000106628395,0.000026001659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970055,0.00002970553,0.00011913518,0.000011619759,0.000025342664,0.00011362322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010662432,0.00019431059,0.00018926951,0.00023121614,0.00025551312,0.0003107663,0.00013214123,0.00017444052,0.0007179743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000378368,0.00013815616,0.000085450745,0.00014179063,0.00030195375,0.00014544842,0.0002516672,0.00019547889,0.00010102767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014391032,0.00007628207,0.9914622,0.000016787084,0.00003657364,0.00015212053,0.0004851319,0.00012803018,0.00577249,0.000009914161,0.000067066605,0.0016494767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.934756e-7,0.000039445626,0.99959916,0.0000012338915,0.0000021468798,0.00002635282,0.00023759466,0.00002837133,0.00003647912,0.0000028292313,0.000024908528,6.902756e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021073895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10097168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021073895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027097785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014806715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041902483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013953963","doi":"10.1071/wr10105","title":"Assessment of risks to non-target species from an encapsulated toxin in a bait proposed for control of feral cats","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Pellet; Introduced species; Zoology; Invasive species; Context (archaeology); Ecology","score_opus":0.12304024322584177,"score_gpt":0.3884643711307956,"score_spread":0.26542412790495384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013953963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998868,0.00022496957,0.00044327872,0.000020915473,0.000004119738,0.00008501658,0.000038654754,0.0000058181568,0.00030922107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939721,0.00048208848,0.0036335504,0.000062908875,0.0000045911684,0.00012810838,0.000136418,0.0000049126,0.0015751673],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960285,0.000066855835,0.00002724128,0.00011920525,0.00015043498,0.000033379834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995129,0.00009737683,0.00017599821,0.000030450059,0.000114400114,0.00006894569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062059495,0.0003792307,0.00035023905,0.00035529176,0.00023370847,0.0005442602,0.00044328562,0.00067520037,0.000767258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007530977,0.00017108455,0.00025359893,0.0001355761,0.0004133634,0.00039943124,0.00032080375,0.00040834333,0.00013466249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018295065,0.0007038577,0.014555043,0.0005938524,0.000095591946,0.00017100772,0.00040082767,0.001000652,0.9672716,0.00015809356,0.000080806145,0.013139106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025765176,0.19150555,0.15123154,0.00025723706,0.00073887414,0.0014860198,0.0009971929,0.0062453942,0.6424902,0.00026956748,0.004451583,0.00006909926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025980177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058287038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025980177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096037716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031024351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006968081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018208871","doi":"10.1071/wr03087","title":"An evaluation of transect, plot and aerial survey techniques to monitor the spatial pattern and status of the bilby (Macrotis lagotis) in the Tanami Desert","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Aerial survey; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Physical geography; Remote sensing; Biology","score_opus":0.07272072530183193,"score_gpt":0.36790497603035704,"score_spread":0.2951842507285251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018208871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918864,0.00091614306,0.0062030917,0.000027920767,0.000015752652,0.0001692848,0.00013977196,0.000037633858,0.0006040631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468471,0.0017084546,0.04997886,0.00006393124,0.000031868145,0.00027844723,0.00034149268,0.000020552618,0.0007293463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691904,0.0017922622,0.00017097393,0.0004415788,0.00058838405,0.000087728105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98664063,0.0064195525,0.002371725,0.00062672835,0.0033746867,0.0005666594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004164306,0.00081687386,0.00038752303,0.0014966519,0.00026182362,0.00044995834,0.00059632934,0.0004143671,0.00036544053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007663724,0.00033022513,0.00036825688,0.0007810199,0.00028805473,0.00061301014,0.00046947857,0.00021598855,0.000113149756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037896011,0.0010602176,0.5835927,0.0014964283,0.0008184286,0.00030376844,0.003087661,0.004783004,0.07048153,0.00012452148,0.00030047807,0.33016172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027449254,0.024825325,0.9125158,0.00014744703,0.00088916556,0.001627043,0.0016466524,0.030090095,0.024201935,0.00009886049,0.0035373452,0.00014593492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072925286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02692329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072925286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046138768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053346675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022023201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021585787","doi":"10.1071/wr11035","title":"Effects of egg oiling on ground-nesting double-crested cormorants at a colony in Lake Ontario: an examination of nest-attendance behaviour","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Context (archaeology); Incubation; Biology; Ecology; Population; Zoology; Cormorant; Wildlife management; Attendance; Wildlife; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.06304438894003343,"score_gpt":0.3414537574102087,"score_spread":0.2784093684701753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021585787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981385,0.00001525618,0.00001032648,0.000010339754,5.043504e-7,0.000003803899,0.000016201137,0.0000010449836,0.0001286707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948287,0.000030502884,0.00008961834,0.000014821907,0.0000010159204,0.000006939524,0.000037560967,7.8495486e-7,0.00033584196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998363,0.0000252341,0.0000065733984,0.000037627895,0.000044034914,0.000050251383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994438,0.000051280498,0.00018781416,0.000023269195,0.00009902162,0.00019487202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015435118,0.00024741067,0.00019909788,0.0001954612,0.0008911234,0.00032475335,0.00023880135,0.000248042,0.0007837416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047202106,0.00013034043,0.00014202147,0.00013362755,0.0006569802,0.00011481626,0.00037953485,0.00024956922,0.00007752768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008270732,0.0003026436,0.85243964,0.00010842229,0.00006760286,0.0009209318,0.009160071,0.000108401415,0.12604158,0.000027887962,0.00023351418,0.009762246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021584085,0.00033367754,0.9978313,0.0000027908666,0.0000053680565,0.000029115545,0.0011480723,0.00002566367,0.0004652478,0.0000023020752,0.00015193067,0.0000023321234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19698448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6627085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80301553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002044167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011197905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39167577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021994883","doi":"10.1071/wr04093","title":"Home ranges of feral cats (Felis catus) in central-western New South Wales, Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Home range; Feral cat; CATS; Habitat; Woodland; Predation; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Wildlife; Fauna; Biology; Felis catus; Medicine","score_opus":0.08799359204062367,"score_gpt":0.3447760694869446,"score_spread":0.25678247744632093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021994883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999742,0.000043446085,0.000027839244,0.0000054174225,4.3031048e-7,0.0000037988477,0.000041543535,9.966535e-7,0.00013460196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991228,0.00008786687,0.00015605932,0.000017154505,0.0000013426096,0.000012033968,0.00012163931,8.069371e-7,0.0004802656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998324,0.000042418204,0.00001869284,0.000038316753,0.000035141155,0.000032943244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951434,0.000090821944,0.00017146187,0.00002524465,0.000089780704,0.00010825872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003193987,0.00016600428,0.00021092388,0.00074695057,0.00038567182,0.00026966163,0.00020874392,0.00018709038,0.00067282363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006643812,0.0002359596,0.00010723161,0.0003630513,0.00041232855,0.0003810897,0.00036767614,0.00011601312,0.00021960634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006303911,0.0000634815,0.98587066,0.000031488922,0.000036762707,0.00036314683,0.0027540012,0.000085596424,0.002531932,0.000020218862,0.00021764978,0.007962061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016871071,0.000057665722,0.99897206,0.000004118816,0.0000041776734,0.00019289486,0.00050989096,0.000068715584,0.000035326037,0.0000041446333,0.00014767579,0.0000016555251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045140453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15964115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045140453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048837194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016277489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089755416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024814202","doi":"10.1071/wr05007","title":"Nest-tree selection by the threatened brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) (Marsupialia : Dasyuridae) in a highly fragmented agricultural landscape","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Deakin University","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Threatened species; Ecology; Biology; Near-threatened species; Diameter at breast height; Nest box; Habitat; Forestry; Geography; Predation","score_opus":0.016438360290522973,"score_gpt":0.26949297385112087,"score_spread":0.2530546135605979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024814202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99992394,0.000011338008,0.0000114587765,0.0000021513265,1.6047233e-7,6.2062816e-7,0.0000060641355,4.87079e-7,0.00004381448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997002,0.000026611,0.000100241894,0.0000073320175,7.581816e-7,0.0000035621322,0.000036388363,5.862395e-7,0.00012436236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999316,0.000016825154,0.000004517929,0.0000176835,0.000013487711,0.000015905145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968255,0.000036618003,0.00015839243,0.000016514126,0.000027497794,0.00007847375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001206478,0.00011903244,0.0001321939,0.0002806623,0.00021309186,0.0002105931,0.00014766573,0.00017206222,0.00051299424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005011623,0.00012478918,0.000061940766,0.00014277575,0.00032800963,0.00021203894,0.00030754277,0.00015694134,0.00014428297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001037861,0.000054857544,0.975464,0.000019528485,0.000019257506,0.00034000972,0.001086725,0.000095584335,0.017555628,0.000020560281,0.00009174022,0.005148315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001508848,0.000108488224,0.99901557,0.0000018414718,0.0000030105398,0.00020191215,0.00030940748,0.00012498678,0.00013701922,0.0000074807344,0.000087272805,0.0000015100096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041846833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021823034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041846833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017220665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009011224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008320689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028933908","doi":"10.1071/wr05030","title":"Temporal dynamics of emergence and dispersal of garter snakes from a communal den in Manitoba","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Biology; Overwintering; Ecology; Population; Competition (biology); Juvenile; Zoology; Abundance (ecology); Mating; Demography","score_opus":0.028779041407658933,"score_gpt":0.28595117487329663,"score_spread":0.2571721334656377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028933908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995449,0.00008359238,0.000030841675,0.000030158559,0.0000012300368,0.0000044499493,0.00009061942,0.0000034822017,0.00021084299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905235,0.00016693679,0.00012628575,0.00003137595,0.000002833882,0.000007904717,0.00032961034,0.0000026092857,0.0002800893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984694,0.000026124879,0.000010788246,0.000044554028,0.000026566117,0.000044984306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923956,0.00008569228,0.00022435508,0.000038435046,0.00017982502,0.00023220341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039241606,0.00022808962,0.00026014104,0.0011457119,0.0010400361,0.0007413145,0.00063868874,0.0003625289,0.00095558714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085042586,0.00029918845,0.0002237707,0.000783904,0.00060005375,0.00033891867,0.0011532546,0.0004173981,0.00013905158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037311478,0.000018330786,0.9935402,0.000018163537,0.000042859367,0.00015847315,0.0025850935,0.000058186433,0.0015383224,0.000032546755,0.00015862045,0.0018119826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.0885595e-7,0.000008454258,0.9987174,0.0000055463042,0.0000063096013,0.000038116268,0.001015265,0.00008634436,0.000019305222,0.000004198373,0.00009551673,0.0000026261473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40070933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81465316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59929067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001767564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010875528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7967539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029438081","doi":"10.1071/wr06075","title":"Tree use by koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) after fire in remnant coastal forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phascolarctos cinereus; Ecology; Biology; Population; Eucalyptus; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Geography; Forestry; Demography","score_opus":0.03139229606173387,"score_gpt":0.3045463444673274,"score_spread":0.27315404840559354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029438081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988794,0.000016064201,0.0000057182783,0.000001433064,3.000779e-7,7.8205267e-7,0.00001767103,4.6399026e-7,0.000069669404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964476,0.00004819493,0.000050600418,0.000006227731,0.0000010081288,0.0000026452135,0.00007551681,6.8109784e-7,0.00017045312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999895,0.00001927251,0.000010754547,0.000029416959,0.000017541295,0.000028040482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995448,0.000053424472,0.00022487609,0.000026573949,0.000043667704,0.000106737985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015003141,0.00019301026,0.00020244672,0.000635564,0.00047920793,0.0003859994,0.0002801832,0.00016623506,0.00094312034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030200384,0.00016278715,0.00018249375,0.00028831657,0.0003481363,0.00025037455,0.0003863554,0.00021363665,0.0002757238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014999481,0.00011666422,0.9887776,0.000025043375,0.00004597882,0.0002627377,0.0012320053,0.000038767266,0.005413782,0.000012603761,0.00003870786,0.0038862068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000123806,0.00008693852,0.99835545,0.0000029881285,0.000009564829,0.00018793125,0.0011432765,0.00004039987,0.00010551493,0.000003307052,0.000061101084,0.0000023885998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0109882895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059062194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0109882895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020158687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011830979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021848679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030398748","doi":"10.1071/wr14061","title":"Survival and cause-specific mortality of the female eastern wild turkey at its northern range edge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Range (aeronautics); Temperate climate; Biosecurity","score_opus":0.20440897436954492,"score_gpt":0.3596341922328944,"score_spread":0.15522521786334947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030398748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99962807,0.000059603073,0.000030444073,0.00001197484,0.0000022587174,0.0000011194628,0.000071973365,0.0000013534678,0.00019330136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996859,0.000032682023,0.000052644475,0.000007888697,0.0000020551909,0.0000015273814,0.00011170054,6.3529643e-7,0.00010495176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985516,0.000030487456,0.0000106840525,0.00005894853,0.00001749799,0.000027154325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952734,0.00006309249,0.00024133637,0.000028576202,0.00005522851,0.00008448733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031923281,0.0001958959,0.00015839361,0.00032670915,0.0002130303,0.00027030695,0.00020566906,0.00015656454,0.0011101622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000656087,0.00010030704,0.0001769939,0.00015488472,0.00023247462,0.00022753877,0.00023059927,0.00019049214,0.0002101362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007461974,0.0000222398,0.9959777,0.000008589887,0.00004207219,0.0001390986,0.0001770652,0.00015372074,0.00066056935,0.000020547748,0.00014792093,0.0025759418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.868843e-7,0.000092917326,0.9990037,0.000005372385,0.00001158351,0.00021111142,0.00027525928,0.00022366684,0.000070057926,0.000013605357,0.00008990882,0.0000020446776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061997287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017389191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061997287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038468005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001307764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012327254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030411425","doi":"10.1071/wr14134","title":"Mule deer–cattle interactions in managed coniferous forests during seasonal grazing periods in southern British Columbia, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Pinus contorta; Grazing; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Wildlife management; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Understory; Stocking; Wildlife; Forage; Forestry; Biology; Canopy","score_opus":0.03796460151613611,"score_gpt":0.28910767196069687,"score_spread":0.25114307044456075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030411425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99867094,0.00017953047,0.000019230274,0.000043469754,0.0000027956987,0.000011275437,0.00039316108,0.0000026742587,0.0006770468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847895,0.00017476316,0.00007955064,0.000039588773,0.0000018027497,0.000014445777,0.00037784356,0.0000016413611,0.0008314061],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996624,0.000046889698,0.0000168805,0.000058778995,0.00006573606,0.0001492037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927634,0.00005835606,0.00011646723,0.000024282755,0.0002409449,0.00028353772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029833935,0.0002454776,0.00034501086,0.0008299632,0.0028518494,0.0009644957,0.00086274504,0.0003101409,0.0016000675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007886427,0.00029005573,0.00015725246,0.0021220238,0.000755316,0.00023851647,0.00045049013,0.00034481307,0.00017039152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104022496,0.00007820522,0.9888209,0.00003387312,0.000046573496,0.00022278042,0.0024009459,0.00013084714,0.00082660915,0.000038534527,0.0009200203,0.0063767247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032654846,0.00001092153,0.9971666,0.000011105851,0.0000070305664,0.000024643638,0.0022448208,0.000071725044,0.0000236601,0.0000064194132,0.00042634184,0.000003452409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99823064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013307875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013307875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008677631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09655583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031219943","doi":"10.1071/wr10206","title":"A small dasyurid predator (Sminthopsis virginiae) rapidly learns to avoid a toxic invader","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Ecology; Predator; Context (archaeology); Introduced species; Toad; Zoology","score_opus":0.1289666662306906,"score_gpt":0.3163087975042859,"score_spread":0.1873421312735953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031219943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995598,0.000041782405,0.00006224847,0.000010977998,0.0000010745011,0.0000059500953,0.000017627817,0.000006795734,0.00029371996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878484,0.00006519534,0.00037469273,0.00003287902,0.0000017575616,0.000009073121,0.000060276798,0.0000018746706,0.0006693406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994063,0.0000065947243,0.0000028092334,0.000022765636,0.000011694486,0.000015430007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979895,0.000022862356,0.00008458818,0.000012157284,0.000023107506,0.000058252153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009275346,0.00022623563,0.00016133352,0.000255405,0.00036220555,0.0002830334,0.00018466584,0.00021545027,0.0011048575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033772385,0.00014235174,0.000118890646,0.00006800732,0.00033050135,0.00024084235,0.00034845874,0.00032120006,0.00021269218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032753442,0.00024115904,0.69677883,0.00018950616,0.000075437085,0.0005386107,0.0016708216,0.00037106144,0.2781598,0.0001347708,0.00042848964,0.021084001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033480321,0.00041169644,0.99364024,0.000014986363,0.000017723576,0.0003666493,0.00059040263,0.00054043444,0.0037982492,0.000042298343,0.00056556193,0.00000838349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075384886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030726338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075384886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037001973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021745337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014989257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031846047","doi":"10.1071/wr04031","title":"Home range of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), a marsupial carnivore, in a rainshadow woodland","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Woodland; Home range; Carnivore; Ecology; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Predation; Habitat","score_opus":0.02804340595625633,"score_gpt":0.29110458496967967,"score_spread":0.26306117901342335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031846047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998802,0.000027503966,0.00001597853,0.000003201563,3.2292482e-7,0.0000014960414,0.000020687894,6.555791e-7,0.000049815026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994955,0.00003572246,0.00017596562,0.000011715192,0.0000014473045,0.000004708949,0.00007216341,7.398893e-7,0.00020201222],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991655,0.00001557483,0.0000062691524,0.000032118496,0.000013001325,0.00001644224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973875,0.000028125116,0.00009580581,0.000012471533,0.00003261525,0.00009216868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001628522,0.00018995996,0.00019338126,0.0005457872,0.00033514368,0.0001786695,0.00019764845,0.00014985484,0.00060931453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028155127,0.00015610644,0.00012591515,0.00020159072,0.00040639486,0.00022804918,0.00033476876,0.00013613379,0.00015977872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012468283,0.000048079735,0.9713913,0.000031358788,0.00004886176,0.00028437455,0.0017065867,0.00007548021,0.019789673,0.000015249885,0.00010309683,0.0063811615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014219972,0.00008208796,0.9992902,0.00000237937,0.0000044916505,0.00012750762,0.0002362811,0.00006443858,0.00010718067,0.0000032281077,0.000079168196,0.0000016467227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020885708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08435581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020885708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030954686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013080309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041528285},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2031927163","doi":"10.1071/wrv36n4_ed","title":"Wildlife Research in a changing world","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Scope (computer science); Geography; Environmental planning; Habitat; Discipline; Ecology; Political science; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.11248800991733524,"score_gpt":0.38911034706574815,"score_spread":0.2766223371484129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031927163","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0102943005,0.4660141,0.0023040585,0.4484398,0.0280034,0.000038419494,0.0006332966,0.00017235179,0.044100255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08712303,0.65313846,0.016723914,0.15477465,0.051039312,0.00014751779,0.0013510407,0.00023942594,0.03546261],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98803085,0.0062135193,0.0011299284,0.0016577548,0.0023208242,0.0006472817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9484464,0.020225678,0.004734258,0.005012352,0.010990141,0.010591207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021188203,0.0005599585,0.0014354092,0.0085038785,0.0037552032,0.013512939,0.002624431,0.007255544,0.019054761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022817826,0.00040996942,0.00071822177,0.0186173,0.011145406,0.02399012,0.005049298,0.0046193274,0.00433607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009543426,0.00015067792,0.017313158,0.0024681622,0.00013882742,0.0009157055,0.006170694,0.00027539837,0.0015505666,0.08786723,0.4062392,0.476815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007220532,0.000054596585,0.0070006796,0.0017722448,0.000023005789,0.0008039978,0.0077200253,0.000049928356,0.00006872611,0.029890532,0.95258206,0.00002701892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034049887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008125969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021188203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039486876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058390805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11205524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032513942","doi":"10.1071/wr05091","title":"Long-term automated monitoring of the distribution of small carnivores","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Felis catus; Erinaceus; Wildlife; Carnivore; Camera trap; Geography; Footprint; Tracking (education); Zoology; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Predation; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04850687233604614,"score_gpt":0.3342857288054747,"score_spread":0.2857788564694286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032513942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99692553,0.00006356556,0.0021016034,0.000006897513,0.000002116887,0.000024994612,0.00034038897,0.000051097948,0.0004837993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99002284,0.00006164209,0.008058252,0.000015615838,0.000007581141,0.0000875198,0.0012200037,0.000010396678,0.000516242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951375,0.00015064466,0.000018331422,0.00014618118,0.00012535106,0.000045689983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862814,0.00024585708,0.00048695123,0.00017316826,0.00031430132,0.00015163829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006980338,0.00016361159,0.00024788125,0.0005584259,0.00021392651,0.00019977808,0.0004926883,0.00015726898,0.00045500632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085029344,0.00012448992,0.00012267259,0.00046564965,0.00021475172,0.00033940322,0.00037548455,0.00017515101,0.00017352363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077126536,0.00032506604,0.80842775,0.0001435699,0.00016756904,0.00009474814,0.0006411836,0.0036300696,0.103156514,0.000069642185,0.00058707607,0.08198551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019784678,0.0008929471,0.98508066,0.000011843957,0.000041640305,0.000113982904,0.0001299322,0.005153305,0.007713595,0.000034641234,0.0007923066,0.000015478841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033681472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010026848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033681472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002998907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022557953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0066970587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033740351","doi":"10.1071/wr12115","title":"Importance of getting the numbers right: quantifying the rapid and substantial decline of an abundant marsupial, Bettongia penicillata","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Colorado State University","keywords":"Ecology; Mark and recapture; Population; Endangered species; Population size; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Geography; Context (archaeology); Population decline; Wildlife; Threatened species; Nest (protein structural motif); Occupancy; Marsupial; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.05598821278998205,"score_gpt":0.3308031804190195,"score_spread":0.27481496762903745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033740351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341596,0.023408411,0.02124887,0.0029222986,0.00022315439,0.00015964315,0.0022929707,0.00021945997,0.015365652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98027587,0.0046819886,0.012144038,0.00055627304,0.00014001109,0.00009373787,0.0009744436,0.00002567465,0.0011078769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990546,0.00030271863,0.00009853991,0.00024173349,0.0002512813,0.000051115934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963111,0.0011107748,0.0015505344,0.00020612171,0.00067102263,0.00015038712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019459447,0.0003414939,0.0003327752,0.0013976948,0.00044887193,0.0011296533,0.00069577136,0.0005457162,0.0007795406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005298134,0.00018008449,0.00021561858,0.00090527267,0.0010254356,0.001954327,0.0013659077,0.0009374985,0.00022124418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024147732,0.00006268199,0.6023943,0.004832601,0.00035609215,0.0007537122,0.0034754518,0.008385542,0.032961182,0.0020374137,0.005178581,0.33932096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065364757,0.0004337426,0.95477825,0.00056839956,0.0002106541,0.000979478,0.0024242545,0.004688579,0.00608375,0.0026701817,0.02708025,0.00007597634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067244824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113015305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067244824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006902355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031853662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013370693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037449408","doi":"10.1071/wr12024","title":"Hidden biodiversity in rare northern Australian vertebrates: the case of the clawless geckos (Crenadactylus, Diplodactylidae) of the Kimberley","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phylogeography; Allopatric speciation; Biodiversity; Biogeography; Biology; Subspecies; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Genetic diversity; Range (aeronautics); Context (archaeology); Biodiversity hotspot; Lineage (genetic); Geography; Endemism; Phylogenetic tree; Evolutionary biology; Population; Paleontology","score_opus":0.04840640790592702,"score_gpt":0.3005431618873764,"score_spread":0.25213675398144936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037449408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986351,0.0004085903,0.0001329916,0.00010531956,0.0000016837209,0.0000030548988,0.00006923282,0.000002142434,0.0006417924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990932,0.00027809202,0.00031479454,0.000050547136,0.0000037533416,0.0000032731232,0.00007658587,0.0000017291001,0.00017805424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996977,0.00006569745,0.000017352631,0.000116330804,0.000049850838,0.000053140946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890864,0.00025073977,0.00045852386,0.00010764414,0.00011105616,0.00016330209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005880206,0.00017782922,0.00026923057,0.0010099309,0.0009796768,0.00096754724,0.00040540873,0.00036303783,0.001431477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018734112,0.00013267467,0.00012415514,0.0011348131,0.0016400323,0.0006822811,0.0010289513,0.00037853667,0.00014944002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009366245,0.00001548717,0.951173,0.00028775382,0.00008596425,0.0023926022,0.018802715,0.00016376123,0.008098883,0.0005517162,0.00028326074,0.01805126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7588903e-7,0.000016045256,0.9940031,0.000050138577,0.000016780503,0.00076272653,0.0037673393,0.00012485961,0.00013218148,0.00013440769,0.0009868646,0.0000050216267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026314432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094719216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026314432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057341816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060850405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052322567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037716593","doi":"10.1071/wr06156","title":"Dispersal and the influence of rainfall on a population of the carnivorous marsupial swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Deakin University","keywords":"Biology; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Population; Marsupial; Range (aeronautics); Zoology","score_opus":0.01955521751591842,"score_gpt":0.26845251429362466,"score_spread":0.24889729677770622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037716593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99991417,0.000017903652,0.000012125279,0.0000023860016,2.050181e-7,4.095393e-7,0.000006710605,4.2785632e-7,0.00004559844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998204,0.000027693186,0.00005308248,0.0000029122782,9.4071333e-7,0.0000017390772,0.000024795712,4.795314e-7,0.00006808727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999422,0.000019446677,0.000005239311,0.000014928553,0.000007442012,0.00001075566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955314,0.00012002062,0.000215208,0.000020693931,0.000024955125,0.00006606163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014252846,0.0001100073,0.000098670665,0.00026062565,0.0001670561,0.00018819536,0.00012237969,0.00009708216,0.0006156062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006254137,0.000099622426,0.00010549746,0.00014638227,0.00019612374,0.00013632826,0.00026445207,0.00014717838,0.0000798366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029441714,0.00006796665,0.9568241,0.00003105579,0.00005604659,0.0003714229,0.0007011649,0.0003214578,0.032591328,0.000049393628,0.000047904316,0.008643734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010792359,0.000047660804,0.9995553,8.6717796e-7,0.0000031130985,0.000060178325,0.00006218258,0.00010972961,0.00012807251,0.000006097569,0.0000248372,9.435525e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027110518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066114548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027110518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012407797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007934207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0053905845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041916934","doi":"10.1071/wr11179","title":"Factors influencing the annual risk of bird–window collisions at residential structures in Alberta, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Geography; Residence; Collision; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Hazard; Rural area; Demography; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Biology; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.030480287115077827,"score_gpt":0.3087218696499538,"score_spread":0.27824158253487596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041916934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920259,0.001103976,0.00021038891,0.0005419364,0.000026895821,0.00003744157,0.0015659487,0.000017558988,0.0044699353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603313,0.0007222529,0.00031217904,0.00009724859,0.000007962341,0.000012755849,0.0006740206,0.0000052589935,0.0021351192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934036,0.000054273212,0.000028575054,0.000099020624,0.00023673032,0.00024106582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868876,0.00008725333,0.00023906807,0.00003300601,0.0005057486,0.00044619563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043634293,0.0002619195,0.00022795156,0.0011159775,0.0032549796,0.0012602733,0.0013340292,0.00036679266,0.0030132355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013166876,0.0002940592,0.00030758,0.0021943413,0.00089143077,0.0003274294,0.0008187379,0.000540114,0.00024757657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053940534,0.00003613596,0.98638815,0.000044527962,0.000026557793,0.0002084085,0.0016827035,0.00023886086,0.00022740026,0.00015226028,0.0022129924,0.008728173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029902449,0.000016266527,0.99489427,0.000041282365,0.0000109356915,0.00007186348,0.0034224365,0.00019627981,0.000025772986,0.000033859218,0.0012750563,0.000008994699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99669266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023206634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023206634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020428354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16837674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042376425","doi":"10.1071/wr14138","title":"Attachment and performance of Argos satellite tracking devices fitted to black cockatoos (Calyptorhynchus spp.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Department of the Environment, Australian Government; Murdoch University","keywords":"Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Satellite tracking; Ecology; Biology; Zoology; Engineering; Satellite","score_opus":0.09256437253918678,"score_gpt":0.3608102659776521,"score_spread":0.2682458934384653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042376425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995889,0.00004223332,0.00016235189,0.0000036933166,0.0000032362866,0.0000051076713,0.00004476094,0.0000034752156,0.00014633164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979825,0.00007540692,0.00074051693,0.000015019591,0.0000025937904,0.000012606603,0.00018890791,0.0000040832174,0.0009783874],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997248,0.000037859743,0.000029382125,0.00007950412,0.000091928094,0.000036442605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992636,0.00016418006,0.000261954,0.0000709655,0.00015005471,0.00008927644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036417373,0.00031305337,0.00020427481,0.00031086203,0.00022976595,0.0002747225,0.00020168454,0.00033255448,0.0011584951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010200221,0.00012758022,0.00023209013,0.0001454419,0.00016866851,0.00025550168,0.00035251287,0.00019324118,0.00040209448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001557793,0.00042300278,0.25364047,0.00026534733,0.00010159901,0.0005102874,0.0011928299,0.0012043437,0.71077275,0.00004993666,0.00026633518,0.030015413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026771137,0.012102615,0.8483011,0.000045216748,0.00016880006,0.0010908492,0.000762482,0.0025458033,0.13322784,0.000026443755,0.0016686285,0.000033355656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002006012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039485954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002006012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017398105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010357285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0039886236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044106716","doi":"10.1071/wr04037","title":"Movements and home ranges of radio-tracked Crocodylus porosus in the Cambridge Gulf region of Western Australia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Dry season; Juvenile; Home range; Wet season; Geography; Seasonal breeder; Crocodylus; Seasonality; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.06719073729639276,"score_gpt":0.3368331616688021,"score_spread":0.2696424243724094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044106716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979097,0.00002189323,0.000014212785,0.000004650876,4.5004785e-7,0.0000018541341,0.00003811051,7.950589e-7,0.00012705634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999062,0.000054841683,0.0001095402,0.000010790464,0.0000011351448,0.00000546267,0.000112452835,9.539852e-7,0.00064277253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998975,0.00001546197,0.00000995932,0.000029491754,0.00002371465,0.000023781939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996747,0.000027096476,0.00013865346,0.000013362796,0.00007064175,0.00007560295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016316914,0.00013717938,0.00016037415,0.00066374004,0.00029335913,0.00025006608,0.00024398517,0.00016909784,0.0007780441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004363182,0.000197132,0.00010111596,0.00031071476,0.0003715689,0.0002518393,0.00038561577,0.0001477577,0.00020071343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062550855,0.00002788697,0.98571265,0.000020527785,0.00002669236,0.00026595054,0.0026508493,0.00006272361,0.0050191404,0.000014769824,0.0001374931,0.0059987833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.586133e-7,0.000022148606,0.9993425,0.000002269289,0.0000017120283,0.000057068508,0.00041858963,0.000037221274,0.00003570745,0.000001145581,0.00007983927,0.0000010466067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111906715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31030297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111906715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057330454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019032838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2225107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045413625","doi":"10.1071/wr06110","title":"Broad-scale environmental influences on the abundance of saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) in Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carbon Engineering (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Crocodylus; Crocodile; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Wetland; Habitat; Population; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.049192032319576626,"score_gpt":0.3346539384556485,"score_spread":0.28546190613607186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045413625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983084,0.000016940261,0.00003573618,0.0000094953875,3.7200414e-7,0.0000014738018,0.000017514829,9.728154e-7,0.000086693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998307,0.000021957874,0.000035665085,0.0000044586436,5.498923e-7,0.000001931625,0.000029099057,5.559383e-7,0.00007500027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998541,0.00006173412,0.000008188247,0.000030051478,0.000017479628,0.000028370774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954045,0.00013810964,0.00011033598,0.00002745008,0.000067031375,0.000116636525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003997668,0.0001379662,0.00020046461,0.00030531196,0.00021437836,0.0003807799,0.0001819692,0.00021308962,0.0009879274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013713602,0.00020602254,0.00024189496,0.00020563394,0.00051946205,0.0002976606,0.0006489853,0.00016408873,0.00010797272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012651227,0.000067959685,0.985666,0.00002311579,0.00011541032,0.00022455727,0.00042036528,0.005500015,0.0033108243,0.000099606215,0.00008840154,0.004357198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024925712,0.000038206304,0.99781966,0.00000298673,0.0000096603435,0.000021056427,0.00013478985,0.0018644753,0.000035433524,0.00002711347,0.000042152216,0.000002070296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04889984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09651978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04889984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053345686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032060378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097230375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046448571","doi":"10.1071/wr10090","title":"Estimating the population size of a threatened arboreal marsupial: use of distance sampling to dispense with ad hoc survey techniques","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Population size; Population; Population viability analysis; Sampling (signal processing); Distance sampling; Arboreal locomotion; Context (archaeology); Abundance (ecology); Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Computer science; Biology; Endangered species; Environmental science","score_opus":0.07846261288892997,"score_gpt":0.35088234687129916,"score_spread":0.2724197339823692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046448571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8696313,0.0010148375,0.12347584,0.0001801263,0.000030436922,0.00022555547,0.00022767253,0.00012131539,0.005092775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90499836,0.000306832,0.0935962,0.000069307665,0.000020470297,0.00021081748,0.00015230587,0.000012428704,0.0006332385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976404,0.0013424787,0.00012194584,0.00038213722,0.00047398254,0.00003920176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939851,0.002360221,0.0019132529,0.00070000236,0.00087936467,0.0001620113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021421327,0.00041067685,0.00022051783,0.0014930143,0.00045772217,0.0005212188,0.0006938451,0.00028501367,0.0007472788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008146213,0.00017413624,0.00023844394,0.0006686797,0.00065108266,0.00048043302,0.0007811118,0.00029944014,0.0002600954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103967905,0.000074968586,0.6946991,0.00040559613,0.00033434902,0.00033916306,0.0021702906,0.008213048,0.03173822,0.0010015784,0.00060537155,0.2603143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027341885,0.0009432073,0.9349771,0.00024814162,0.00023258849,0.0014767929,0.0025108734,0.031134572,0.01818164,0.0018401722,0.008345663,0.00008183817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005902303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022684282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005902303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045038725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004376733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0117358565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051321352","doi":"10.1071/wr05014","title":"The immediate impact of 1080 aerial baiting to control wild dogs on a spotted-tailed quoll population","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"NSW Department of Primary Industries","keywords":"Biology; Dingo; Population; Wildlife; Ecology; Predation; Zoology; Medicine","score_opus":0.02656552524991818,"score_gpt":0.3358626897373338,"score_spread":0.3092971644874156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051321352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99974245,0.000025100087,0.000017852468,0.000014459851,0.000001311816,0.0000049378555,0.000014003985,0.0000013024245,0.00017869593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994692,0.000049388815,0.00015668859,0.000035738994,0.000003165341,0.0000053164454,0.000057282796,5.032893e-7,0.00022266306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997613,0.00006789559,0.000013287146,0.00005203944,0.00004000442,0.00006556943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994056,0.000080138925,0.00019281983,0.000024649227,0.00009438315,0.00020246115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041929338,0.00025275748,0.00015172572,0.0002289149,0.00038780167,0.00031088572,0.0003057238,0.00035892546,0.0010896282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066618243,0.000082701634,0.00015762252,0.00008796398,0.00037919186,0.00026886168,0.00041229886,0.00023241212,0.00014915175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065397535,0.0006103998,0.92733103,0.00007155395,0.00005579349,0.0009849638,0.0013524767,0.00043865398,0.046444513,0.00010777085,0.00037990388,0.021568988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009940903,0.0026329271,0.9937972,0.000011658527,0.0000175783,0.00031469093,0.00086551363,0.00083145546,0.001214251,0.000025387166,0.00027214136,0.00000728072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009069982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025437886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009069982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005037623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002813857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018034399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052722082","doi":"10.1071/wr03098","title":"The influence of predation risk on foraging behaviour of brushtail possums in Australian woodlands","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Predation; Woodland; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Fauna; Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.03058703281397451,"score_gpt":0.32582711155791155,"score_spread":0.29524007874393704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052722082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998913,0.00002352437,0.000009075224,0.000006370674,2.4176626e-7,5.5643875e-7,0.000008246034,2.5630683e-7,0.000060440507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975795,0.0000420885,0.00004867261,0.0000057796656,6.551046e-7,0.0000017799217,0.000023350145,3.3124036e-7,0.000119515404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977356,0.00008600513,0.000015097545,0.000037264934,0.00004238538,0.000045653684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929154,0.00016583226,0.00029030867,0.00003361852,0.00005570913,0.00016296975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040899334,0.00020871327,0.00019455641,0.00041679534,0.00041823892,0.00038418293,0.0001907184,0.00023983157,0.0008134495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012495524,0.00023164092,0.00018066786,0.00021038881,0.00048906234,0.00029939847,0.00044373402,0.00018507235,0.00010537992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019521744,0.000059720554,0.9889443,0.000027693424,0.00004591418,0.00027272286,0.0014492361,0.00013056128,0.004354682,0.000036440877,0.000070593655,0.004413017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.842722e-7,0.000049737333,0.9995983,0.0000014415629,0.0000030420022,0.000040186053,0.00018756573,0.00006539203,0.000026420437,0.000005969912,0.000020430021,9.87993e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028895626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12368775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028895626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004987272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017469334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057454824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054131636","doi":"10.1071/wr11167","title":"Evidence for source–sink dynamics in a regional population of arctic ground squirrels (Urocitellus parryii plesius)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Council; Parks Canada","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Habitat; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Arctic; Geography; Population; Sink (geography); Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.249838221422681,"score_gpt":0.4210724452981908,"score_spread":0.17123422387550982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054131636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99982494,0.000015235382,0.000032686636,0.0000031854493,4.9245796e-7,8.3496263e-7,0.000030944902,0.0000011286189,0.00009063374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998142,0.000011680123,0.000066349276,0.0000035522285,8.8416476e-7,0.000001281532,0.00007671691,6.4272785e-7,0.000024805944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989545,0.00002039019,0.000009929124,0.000039663504,0.000013710438,0.000020857748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941266,0.00008396176,0.00026841025,0.00005377858,0.00007905958,0.00010205772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003047658,0.00014731415,0.00016729377,0.0004906983,0.0003274897,0.00030149551,0.00021525993,0.0001631178,0.0007230121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059387827,0.00014952954,0.00017838812,0.0002804376,0.000391199,0.00024422933,0.0002496173,0.00014271463,0.00008067331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013287568,0.000028124914,0.9848124,0.000015616326,0.000040100556,0.000082897954,0.0003710229,0.00006635499,0.012980203,0.00003351965,0.000031877913,0.0014050481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019571132,0.000034457942,0.9994691,0.0000013140765,0.000009210635,0.00006639751,0.0001592927,0.00009347062,0.00012185775,0.0000082932675,0.00003336709,0.0000013419407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014812598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035291683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014812598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027808876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002245979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029452741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059004992","doi":"10.1071/wr14196","title":"The effect of research activities and winter precipitation on voiding behaviour of Agassiz’s desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tortoise; Survivorship curve; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Juvenile; Precipitation; Ecology; Desert (philosophy); Mark and recapture; Abiotic component; Wildlife management; Population; Biology; Demography; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.08912119933354325,"score_gpt":0.3906333435753175,"score_spread":0.30151214424177425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059004992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997068,0.00006348064,0.000058861147,0.000018579916,0.000001362624,0.0000016393942,0.000055943794,0.0000017691997,0.00009167159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957055,0.000045246205,0.0001520249,0.000015411963,0.000004326357,0.000005983071,0.00011366805,0.0000010832191,0.00009176474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924445,0.0003266107,0.00006924976,0.00016501547,0.000102152706,0.00009255999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624795,0.0011228313,0.001922547,0.0001829237,0.00014150329,0.00038228012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010623225,0.00027928175,0.00019283955,0.0004708742,0.0003371032,0.0004308769,0.00025472406,0.00023125495,0.000808723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025510993,0.00013766802,0.0003603658,0.00034045125,0.00046351284,0.000306378,0.00045778873,0.00025444324,0.000087594504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010825716,0.000053311025,0.9962359,0.000015315143,0.000091950205,0.000044414675,0.0002068075,0.000100701625,0.0010231101,0.000010408661,0.00005077261,0.0020590215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.644491e-7,0.000060584753,0.9996344,0.00000170745,0.000010431388,0.000017320022,0.000096084106,0.00009730845,0.000039678227,0.0000060798357,0.000034639364,0.0000011389473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058606747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027479507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058606747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038701098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032294504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011653125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059148513","doi":"10.1071/wr09129","title":"Justification for continued conservation efforts following the delisting of a threatened species: a case study of the woylie, Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi (Marsupialia : Potoroidae)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Government of Western Australia","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Conservation-dependent species; Conservation status; Near-threatened species; Endangered species; Critically endangered; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Population; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Wildlife; Habitat","score_opus":0.07683211321990467,"score_gpt":0.3439742307303185,"score_spread":0.26714211751041383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059148513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877378,0.0012075515,0.000399005,0.0027104719,0.0000370326,0.00006173728,0.00003987104,0.000008097258,0.007798394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491876,0.0011982477,0.0015132708,0.000514983,0.000022936041,0.000045860692,0.000043552573,0.0000043188243,0.0017381426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.999273,0.00033259575,0.000039544455,0.00006698507,0.00013898266,0.0001489152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815494,0.0006538338,0.0005801315,0.00006182122,0.00018432223,0.0003649984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016973523,0.00028232866,0.00019988573,0.000858552,0.003738099,0.0012721828,0.0008103371,0.0014828679,0.0019783652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035241134,0.00017569195,0.00022543289,0.00077003555,0.0018052033,0.0013528385,0.0016607352,0.0011360206,0.00012357025],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035453725,0.00058906595,0.47138432,0.0020195665,0.00014197423,0.17218988,0.14012802,0.0024600856,0.0109590925,0.007961611,0.014000871,0.17781098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003146255,0.0013704879,0.53013253,0.0011810581,0.000113558024,0.05160241,0.30717316,0.0019028347,0.0018609931,0.0019883097,0.10252545,0.000117759126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015140814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07680577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015140814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002255056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016007014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030105352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060250418","doi":"10.1071/wr10020","title":"Is there a conflict between cetacean conservation and marine renewable-energy developments?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"Marine Mammal Commission","keywords":"Renewable energy; Wildlife; Marine energy; Marine spatial planning; Fishery; Wind power; Marine conservation; Environmental resource management; Tidal power; Scale (ratio); Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Geography; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.08170286668010912,"score_gpt":0.3322588069745695,"score_spread":0.2505559402944604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060250418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043461334,0.097007856,0.0011562783,0.80646884,0.0037558507,0.000018489383,0.00017688864,0.000017292678,0.047937207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5927744,0.15340316,0.0032687439,0.22806685,0.008827401,0.000056117497,0.00021062374,0.000028441458,0.013364312],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975212,0.0012013727,0.00019462369,0.00023773064,0.0005773261,0.00026762264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899602,0.0052354126,0.0018053371,0.0003993688,0.0013312624,0.0012683414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007630206,0.00018875407,0.0006866294,0.00090702326,0.001079266,0.004397588,0.0009507798,0.0032016372,0.01072082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014593888,0.00014965421,0.00022684515,0.002016123,0.0038262226,0.004722908,0.0020876664,0.0028705497,0.0011475623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004036931,0.00017865805,0.06345594,0.0032042032,0.00029778288,0.0011836509,0.003152358,0.00029987723,0.0012559494,0.06223579,0.09753125,0.7668008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081654565,0.0005437564,0.15743046,0.007413475,0.00017236802,0.0028846303,0.05149928,0.0004064485,0.00062592013,0.11947839,0.6593861,0.00007749899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038329803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010234227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01072082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010354256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014174944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04035282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061619371","doi":"10.1071/wr12117","title":"Field testing of single-administration porcine zona pellucida contraceptive vaccines in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ASL Environmental Sciences (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Adjuvant; Context (archaeology); Population; Medicine; Vaccination; Biology; Animal science; Immunology; Zoology","score_opus":0.048950675794769416,"score_gpt":0.3023139367096526,"score_spread":0.2533632609148832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061619371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988985,0.00005442457,0.00050534925,0.00001519929,0.000005063703,0.00014551192,0.0001507985,0.000007829895,0.0002173019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99346644,0.00015402933,0.004223228,0.00008227787,0.00001095423,0.00033462196,0.00036883913,0.000003931322,0.0013557819],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996612,0.0000804819,0.000022007775,0.00012205204,0.00005173448,0.0000625065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999401,0.00019369178,0.00014318145,0.0000396704,0.00013164066,0.00009081424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006295615,0.00031597176,0.00022861478,0.00025985498,0.0002781638,0.00020154574,0.00032219468,0.00040052342,0.00073349354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049547263,0.00013662613,0.00019638515,0.000094214236,0.00034601535,0.0002542812,0.00013695235,0.00034253468,0.0001494483],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031271426,0.006014429,0.05688953,0.00024163153,0.000053640997,0.00025606898,0.0006209242,0.0009990527,0.9161457,0.00013296737,0.00035127785,0.015167701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004767862,0.22057149,0.16523467,0.000049709273,0.00015542365,0.0013663366,0.0016814892,0.0031960846,0.6029831,0.00017450187,0.0040731137,0.00003719592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00315977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063657807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00315977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032061787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040212454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006282747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062086019","doi":"10.1071/wr05001","title":"An assessment of the audibility of sound from human transport by breeding Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Noise (video); Sound (geography); Range (aeronautics); Snow; Underwater; Environmental science; Oceanography; Geography; Meteorology; Geology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06293892196125997,"score_gpt":0.39143610931277995,"score_spread":0.32849718735152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062086019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99977,0.000019491414,0.0000806434,0.0000022042675,9.667228e-7,0.0000035696246,0.000017189239,0.0000011301736,0.00010482535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912924,0.00005415902,0.00036951707,0.000012521092,0.000003550956,0.000013036388,0.00008918479,0.0000016811997,0.00032719714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998599,0.00002511463,0.000013341624,0.00004544715,0.000034884673,0.000021250025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995727,0.0000898567,0.00013711274,0.00003312946,0.000086745364,0.0000803947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028172662,0.00024044908,0.00018629254,0.00030342088,0.00028128162,0.00031434055,0.00013383654,0.00031907763,0.00071567495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058876246,0.00017094726,0.00017119684,0.000116101866,0.0004053158,0.0002214451,0.00036862178,0.00025010138,0.00017913213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009570015,0.00020465525,0.6222817,0.000117185635,0.00007250398,0.00030334885,0.0028700163,0.0002073273,0.35875618,0.000045325985,0.00007595091,0.014108781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047601543,0.0015515119,0.9910005,0.0000070443507,0.000018928258,0.00016954169,0.00087372144,0.00012681024,0.006100952,0.0000119330425,0.00012874801,0.000005561248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025092068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003979417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025092068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013872262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013168615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0049892664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063309068","doi":"10.1071/wr03041","title":"Population structure, turnover and movement of spotted-tailed quolls on the New England Tablelands","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Biology; Population; Ecology; Wildlife management; Zoology; Wildlife; Demography","score_opus":0.02495570494433349,"score_gpt":0.2803911583633984,"score_spread":0.25543545341906493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063309068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998141,0.000032282867,0.000021425883,0.000007988132,6.1943655e-7,0.0000022668594,0.0000465923,6.79339e-7,0.000073974625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926275,0.00004168304,0.00010242479,0.0000100933,0.0000017265427,0.000008258151,0.00015525946,8.169513e-7,0.00041707474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979717,0.000041128114,0.0000152736,0.000069627415,0.000037465117,0.00003936621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990791,0.00011136308,0.00039218724,0.000034370798,0.00016420784,0.00021875689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026138363,0.00013572795,0.00017460441,0.00077422184,0.0003811985,0.00044729986,0.0003237447,0.00022344514,0.0011570409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007518833,0.0001903409,0.000096802156,0.00041408575,0.00050823187,0.0005064814,0.00042729647,0.00024296678,0.00021015784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006980071,0.000031630723,0.9913931,0.00001574039,0.000022815499,0.00023345431,0.0021231158,0.00005403893,0.0032742468,0.000030010293,0.000111009984,0.002641139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021312712,0.000038880353,0.99888414,0.000003892689,0.0000040945724,0.000105302825,0.00062948494,0.00010047463,0.00006679707,0.0000052792598,0.0001566481,0.0000029159123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07473197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2612609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07473197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000986353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026855327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14859396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065380933","doi":"10.1071/wr03131","title":"Can outbreaks of house mice in south-eastern Australia be predicted by weather models?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outbreak; Predictability; Geography; Population; Vegetation (pathology); House mouse; House mice; Climatology; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Demography; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10348331647345724,"score_gpt":0.34754355957436933,"score_spread":0.2440602431009121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065380933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99515754,0.00009574123,0.0034592224,0.00039545516,0.0000115714,0.000011172695,0.00015578531,0.000046379322,0.00066711556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987913,0.00006402176,0.00064007385,0.00003068328,0.0000085372685,0.000006519386,0.0001597911,0.0000069846747,0.0002921222],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977404,0.00009621546,0.000016436163,0.000060317743,0.000012510009,0.000040531468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985487,0.0006578047,0.00038198923,0.00009471014,0.00016602155,0.00015069626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011464696,0.000582423,0.00048486778,0.00044278792,0.00028772262,0.00082520844,0.00063049427,0.0006506674,0.0007638166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005517494,0.0005355916,0.0005573887,0.00024667557,0.00040750243,0.0010268659,0.0004710459,0.0006289908,0.00021850962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028729852,0.00012937278,0.2548779,0.000036209258,0.00018735262,0.00013880733,0.00017583642,0.7322227,0.0011119203,0.0009896008,0.0006733887,0.009169592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016897484,0.000027896194,0.03558145,0.0000054331717,0.000020107389,0.000016872653,0.00003523492,0.96319073,0.00010639963,0.0008584291,0.00013117166,0.0000094172165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09147505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057300013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09147505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010435852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060091686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18188518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066645665","doi":"10.1071/wr06081","title":"Usefulness of funnel traps in catching small reptiles and mammals, with comments on the effectiveness of the alternatives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Edith Cowan University","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Fauna; Ecology; Fossorial; Funnel; Biology; Squamata; Foraging; Abundance (ecology); Netting; Habitat; Environmental science","score_opus":0.06368735049202758,"score_gpt":0.30377699826938054,"score_spread":0.24008964777735298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066645665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42930195,0.14452915,0.27086112,0.024271155,0.009525355,0.008262875,0.005123172,0.0016117902,0.10651349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58449674,0.046431553,0.31179488,0.0044052093,0.0019562994,0.0023679305,0.0014259621,0.00034314822,0.0467784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201137,0.0036437714,0.0011573528,0.0005188288,0.0024137986,0.00025486006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735407,0.01483207,0.0024219363,0.0015718113,0.0071558007,0.0004776592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019503782,0.0012494351,0.0006625064,0.002868188,0.0009873168,0.0015122988,0.0029635855,0.0022972855,0.0036896646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027713487,0.0009301464,0.001155066,0.0016555713,0.001241779,0.004131531,0.0016141805,0.00095171377,0.0022855764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053937174,0.0004996155,0.2063379,0.0113387,0.0005559119,0.0069743204,0.0037273287,0.003970704,0.07449175,0.0053315097,0.019101137,0.66227746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000385576,0.008991351,0.5327439,0.0074723233,0.001401912,0.033733256,0.009140089,0.01539603,0.08360564,0.006502461,0.29971814,0.0009093387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054310006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013665863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019503782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045840858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061412033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10314709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068295275","doi":"10.1071/wr07106","title":"Achieving population goals in a long-lived wildlife species (Equus caballus) with contraception","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Veterinary Equine Medical Research","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Park Service; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Population; Population growth; Wildlife; Population control; Equus; Demography; Biology; Wildlife management; Family planning; Ecology","score_opus":0.259195008381391,"score_gpt":0.4383495313288694,"score_spread":0.1791545229474784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068295275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98967886,0.0025276872,0.0028665038,0.0003618232,0.00001295119,0.00007304298,0.000051136365,0.000020225585,0.0044077723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99157786,0.0011159921,0.0044952445,0.00015632247,0.00001743952,0.00008162923,0.000081898084,0.00000410428,0.0024693906],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976367,0.000089499496,0.00001586969,0.00002673882,0.000059528164,0.000044769145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996691,0.00008104557,0.000112319714,0.000016007398,0.000064928216,0.000056550656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081005035,0.00021013018,0.0002214563,0.00020828267,0.00043590972,0.00037986969,0.0002791106,0.0003345818,0.0014292921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089457305,0.00008837301,0.00011056763,0.00013351062,0.00032923775,0.0005573364,0.00034019235,0.0002675624,0.00015292618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018028986,0.0023719752,0.16128853,0.0011432326,0.00015434713,0.0027031607,0.0027339775,0.01212318,0.58748627,0.0091780275,0.0025480508,0.21646647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030830665,0.05319741,0.59279794,0.00043541816,0.00026324907,0.014617209,0.005979574,0.015227205,0.23616186,0.009053876,0.07184137,0.0001166067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001413933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005748431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014292921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003525473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005156113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004781425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070674059","doi":"10.1071/wr04033","title":"Regional patterns of mammal abundance and their relationship to landscape variables in eucalypt woodlands near Darwin, northern Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland; Mammal; Wildlife; Ecology; Habitat; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Fragmentation (computing); Vegetation (pathology); Habitat fragmentation; Landscape ecology; Wildlife conservation; Biodiversity; Biology","score_opus":0.06414832363612448,"score_gpt":0.31698444309867424,"score_spread":0.25283611946254975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070674059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998708,0.00001872264,0.000014492094,0.00000431726,1.7125892e-7,7.229763e-7,0.000019218269,5.572122e-7,0.00007108071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998161,0.000016321625,0.00004625737,0.0000027791632,5.182521e-7,0.0000014047721,0.00003803206,3.8115027e-7,0.000078320714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987185,0.00003356444,0.0000114748445,0.00004260967,0.000016483893,0.000024122748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949014,0.00011204116,0.00019955864,0.000029192026,0.00007817177,0.00009091273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022963104,0.00007342331,0.00012522534,0.0004642894,0.00016416684,0.00026331338,0.00016636445,0.00012646783,0.0005505497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007962795,0.000109838846,0.000089606416,0.00032059124,0.00031734083,0.00021967631,0.0002922829,0.0001301097,0.000077076395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059039576,0.000016328258,0.9947508,0.000009600362,0.00003117047,0.0000868579,0.00073090056,0.00016196318,0.001722022,0.000026806792,0.000042807278,0.0023617148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.414176e-7,0.000008147771,0.99969554,8.59994e-7,0.0000023304317,0.000031572337,0.00013417673,0.000091265894,0.000015425094,0.000004245357,0.000015419371,6.4948136e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038367257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104345806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038367257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032856298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012838114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076287925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074314079","doi":"10.1071/wr05038","title":"Dietary strategy of the swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus) (Marsupialia : Dasyuridae) in coastal and inland heathland habitats","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Deakin University","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Swamp; Generalist and specialist species; Predation; Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.0285564311319642,"score_gpt":0.288425299120768,"score_spread":0.25986886798880376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074314079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999256,0.000013862539,0.000005704479,8.912173e-7,1.2910762e-7,4.240525e-7,0.00000873067,4.0902134e-7,0.00004421028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99963033,0.000024956122,0.00008309226,0.000004292127,6.4006286e-7,0.0000023826713,0.00004913728,7.890669e-7,0.00020436588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999504,0.000008642017,0.000004297753,0.000016083648,0.000006280884,0.0000142681565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985814,0.000015675185,0.00006422733,0.00000777501,0.000013010959,0.000041171832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007803762,0.0001808104,0.00019085812,0.00048341227,0.00025273458,0.00027391486,0.00017217563,0.00013476345,0.00060336944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025708094,0.00013871242,0.00010425509,0.00025372568,0.00028468916,0.00014014618,0.00028721147,0.00010633341,0.000104671766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052425644,0.000087247754,0.895932,0.000087007786,0.00009462104,0.00040733765,0.003240544,0.00016242999,0.08559349,0.00005836237,0.0000949999,0.013717775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011662728,0.00007421424,0.9992488,0.0000016803269,0.000005367757,0.00008541102,0.00030166408,0.0000458018,0.00016788037,0.00000568521,0.000060747065,0.0000016141248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067297183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032432057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067297183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022443777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010216912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013381124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076615238","doi":"10.1071/wr03068","title":"Status of Australian sea lions, Neophoca cinerea, and New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, on Eyre Peninsula and the far west coast of South Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Shaughnessy Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Fur seal; Geography; Reef; Fishery; Full moon; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.09791474959859696,"score_gpt":0.3499212276295176,"score_spread":0.25200647803092063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076615238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994844,0.000067675006,0.0000069310236,0.000011169224,6.134309e-7,0.0000023708392,0.000043689517,6.69161e-7,0.00038241647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886155,0.00014086606,0.000054347973,0.000023756234,0.0000018023005,0.000008377021,0.00016351473,6.153424e-7,0.0007451544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976546,0.000033673237,0.000024122091,0.00005736774,0.00006258137,0.00005689476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989786,0.000065254084,0.0005010725,0.00003140824,0.00021551282,0.00020807575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003343299,0.00020754445,0.0002048795,0.0008601279,0.00054601853,0.00039625113,0.00028176207,0.00023259457,0.0009208802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010261021,0.0002386161,0.00014175549,0.00056112267,0.00057775574,0.00048442592,0.00058447744,0.00019757818,0.00019871155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004391743,0.000021104777,0.9931979,0.000019432695,0.000016448303,0.00015117963,0.0024002597,0.000020417134,0.0010792859,0.000020115705,0.00008955875,0.002940366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.291587e-7,0.00003262408,0.9991448,0.0000036236709,0.0000038034498,0.00006600574,0.0005995511,0.000018906758,0.00002240771,0.0000021393955,0.000104517305,9.33611e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11656085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32489336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11656085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077544426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004301934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2317648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077486233","doi":"10.1071/wr04059","title":"Positive edge effects for arboreal marsupials: an assessment of potential mechanisms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"James Cook University","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Transect; Rainforest; Belt transect; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Brushtail possum; Biomass (ecology); Biology; Tropical rainforest; Marsupial; Habitat","score_opus":0.02297016836268857,"score_gpt":0.3565309861262355,"score_spread":0.33356081776354696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077486233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983506,0.0004466277,0.0003410079,0.00006178926,0.0000048958423,0.000006737172,0.00006135403,0.000007030944,0.0007198736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912196,0.0001552555,0.00040082852,0.000035714555,0.0000122199335,0.0000052175833,0.000055907814,0.000002424838,0.00021034013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996666,0.00014127069,0.00001757268,0.00006662492,0.000041650837,0.000066255634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649554,0.0017428399,0.0010762925,0.00018753855,0.00022200079,0.00027578953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078268955,0.00040712618,0.00051933754,0.00047781537,0.0004566379,0.00066498993,0.0005122782,0.00046667698,0.0034147648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023797737,0.00019779625,0.00042841097,0.00029195484,0.00043712414,0.000560668,0.00081472215,0.0002507066,0.00012075564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006622387,0.000085437656,0.9736876,0.00015607051,0.00020177753,0.0005433776,0.00034998017,0.00028849818,0.01122651,0.00025312146,0.00007673262,0.012468763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047035087,0.00024071746,0.99855024,0.000009780011,0.000056989775,0.00013681586,0.00017470599,0.00026445583,0.0003500278,0.000088750145,0.00011860687,0.0000041630897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017378728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004915576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034147648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015192694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018070337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011423469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078319711","doi":"10.1071/wr06151","title":"Aerial baiting for wild dogs has no observable impact on spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus) in a rainshadow woodland","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Dingo; Population; Woodland; Ecology; Zoology","score_opus":0.07418041398655643,"score_gpt":0.35526872017146255,"score_spread":0.2810883061849061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078319711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988747,0.0000105665595,0.000005668243,0.000004093357,4.522409e-7,0.0000019699833,0.000011184027,6.1604607e-7,0.0000779184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933535,0.00003947243,0.00007588908,0.000023571503,0.0000016801728,0.0000054184425,0.000095857795,6.740123e-7,0.0004221059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998491,0.000028999388,0.0000092304335,0.00004156487,0.000025019857,0.0000461807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996024,0.000044423203,0.0001508393,0.00001821418,0.00004529773,0.00013889025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002014249,0.0002308725,0.00019107443,0.00027905445,0.00045218482,0.00031342547,0.00033234977,0.0002834674,0.0008176086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035094863,0.00020712097,0.00016350976,0.00011752922,0.00047259737,0.0003113357,0.0003530483,0.00020692399,0.00020450768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069256785,0.00048500547,0.89933276,0.00008026698,0.0000792829,0.0013590769,0.0016657318,0.00018191255,0.0878142,0.00003937085,0.00025012717,0.008019782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052995933,0.0012091621,0.996398,0.000003820668,0.000013661334,0.00021176238,0.00066701573,0.00018095646,0.0011421992,0.000007821721,0.00015716853,0.000003120162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020526528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09089118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020526528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062466494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002606475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0408141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081989450","doi":"10.1071/wr06168","title":"Post-fire recovery of eastern bristlebirds (Dasyornis brachypterus) is context-dependent","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of Wollongong","keywords":"Fire regime; Transect; Context (archaeology); Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Fire ecology; Habitat; Endangered species; Ecology; Wildlife management; Bay; Wildlife conservation; Range (aeronautics); Population; Ecosystem; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.042856486371278826,"score_gpt":0.29965017014271456,"score_spread":0.25679368377143574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081989450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99949336,0.00011885926,0.000031318992,0.000008730192,0.0000023513583,0.0000023138557,0.000045333796,0.00000260436,0.00029517798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898726,0.000118956894,0.000092557,0.000026707432,0.0000026705661,0.0000068246563,0.00017865788,0.0000024437318,0.00058400835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998708,0.000017682645,0.000007427074,0.00004325422,0.000020325928,0.00004044653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996935,0.00003026822,0.0001401751,0.000023907261,0.000036003345,0.00007623769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018397727,0.00015492667,0.0002669193,0.000247552,0.00029782555,0.00040836612,0.00014300928,0.00017658596,0.0010822512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047135673,0.00016799118,0.00014833253,0.00009426888,0.00015396338,0.00013461639,0.00025810214,0.00032908557,0.00025531783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013029531,0.00034107908,0.6277574,0.00012075392,0.000103551014,0.00048400936,0.0008703303,0.00018791265,0.3475167,0.00004536783,0.00041940357,0.02085059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010042313,0.00006873407,0.9990761,0.0000024167944,0.0000036693202,0.000056099332,0.00010669017,0.00003864228,0.0005503511,0.0000039944284,0.00009055843,0.0000017638546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005478698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028073478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005478698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002575019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013616715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010893643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085020494","doi":"10.1071/wr04041","title":"Fecundity, egg size and the influence of rainfall in an isolated population of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Fecundity; Avian clutch size; Biology; Animal science; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Clutch; Ecology; Laying; Range (aeronautics); Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.026483842430877057,"score_gpt":0.33203083541951384,"score_spread":0.3055469929886368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085020494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99991703,0.000010214297,0.000009883895,0.0000028666584,3.2308674e-7,9.3472295e-7,0.000014140389,3.9799855e-7,0.000044079352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99983025,0.000012057946,0.0000374326,0.0000042914994,0.0000014166959,0.0000023040222,0.000046327867,5.852683e-7,0.00006536785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998073,0.00004698155,0.000013489559,0.00006235855,0.000036379006,0.00003350567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893004,0.00022974082,0.00042366222,0.000045415924,0.00011098305,0.00026012797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003698737,0.00018668071,0.0002349534,0.0005658975,0.00037198886,0.00038432577,0.00033846535,0.00023186917,0.0006218188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012267471,0.00022032195,0.0001860105,0.0003089899,0.0006018445,0.00029533755,0.00037677758,0.000300645,0.0001365403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108786924,0.00005904825,0.9934643,0.00000995159,0.000058978796,0.00022453553,0.00061077764,0.00011250243,0.0032888833,0.00001476699,0.00004202622,0.002005521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018307038,0.000045547364,0.9995869,8.581523e-7,0.0000049706678,0.00006334078,0.000115986826,0.00011017392,0.00003744223,0.0000037244774,0.000027844244,0.0000014983522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019110324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04861371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019110324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005784828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017466837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0379982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088839846","doi":"10.1071/wr14030","title":"Effects of low-level culling of feral cats in open populations: a case study from the forests of southern Tasmania","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Richmond Hospital","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Culling; CATS; Wildlife management; Context (archaeology); Feral cat; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Felis catus; Demography; Predation; Medicine","score_opus":0.21371573524756315,"score_gpt":0.3970402660471859,"score_spread":0.18332453079962274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088839846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997631,0.00003497513,0.000036542944,0.00001898754,8.035496e-7,0.0000079428,0.000016374466,9.704987e-7,0.00012028556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957687,0.000054087668,0.00018494815,0.000028175968,0.0000025118811,0.000007074583,0.000035933354,7.272421e-7,0.00010966147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996623,0.00010024153,0.00001950666,0.00006493174,0.00005130012,0.000101818354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896955,0.00021875398,0.0003335339,0.000058210044,0.00016179777,0.00025808552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082670816,0.0003153512,0.00026910097,0.0005161461,0.0015703166,0.00056438876,0.000579891,0.0004566514,0.0008803349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014273429,0.00016522165,0.00029981494,0.0005608714,0.0011689005,0.00031133747,0.0006695495,0.0003990864,0.000067541216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001165906,0.00024683616,0.9647137,0.00010806267,0.00008043734,0.009783471,0.014261023,0.00042578694,0.002848505,0.000112443835,0.0002091133,0.007094081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053649665,0.0002457704,0.9888038,0.000027712924,0.00003217163,0.0015670978,0.008329683,0.0005279167,0.0001509659,0.000047649584,0.00025477138,0.0000071126733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22454214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48967955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22454214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002485683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013388053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44647032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089128489","doi":"10.1071/wr03046","title":"Using faecal pellet counts along transects to estimate quokka (Setonix brachyurus) population density","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Threatened species; Biology; Population density; Population; Pellet; Wildlife management; Marsupial; Ecology; Zoology; Wildlife; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0775627849432705,"score_gpt":0.3899367135325683,"score_spread":0.3123739285892978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089128489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99864,0.00009497234,0.0009207208,0.000008117284,0.0000023417454,0.000009931099,0.000058724363,0.000005459639,0.0002597141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951892,0.00010418893,0.004148569,0.000010199495,0.000003857,0.000022676613,0.00022814213,0.0000022670893,0.00029086333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945897,0.00022786733,0.000038610884,0.00011009491,0.00013582685,0.000028675964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791914,0.0005402947,0.0009208664,0.00017151373,0.00033469687,0.00011354207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082494266,0.00038813622,0.00021448714,0.00081312633,0.00028568401,0.00031908098,0.0003377781,0.00022335736,0.0005095925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004019486,0.00021671013,0.00015970576,0.0004642438,0.0003896954,0.0005002863,0.00035290222,0.00021615789,0.0002358611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096792515,0.000031160514,0.9817925,0.000032160475,0.00005261173,0.000048238,0.0003728317,0.00024593883,0.0046928516,0.000029329289,0.00004246592,0.012563029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006381965,0.00033163617,0.9967026,0.00000930085,0.000023224102,0.0002776807,0.00017193264,0.0013898291,0.00081987714,0.000028631346,0.00023016786,0.000008674788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013624898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041321836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013624898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024198745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019253421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027091205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089309098","doi":"10.1071/wr08017","title":"Advances in wildlife ecology and the influence of Graeme Caughley","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Ecology; Environmental ethics; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Biodiversity; Conservation biology; Ecological stability; Conservation science; Environmental resource management; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.01872891194764521,"score_gpt":0.3115758321154054,"score_spread":0.2928469201677602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089309098","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068087005,0.35464206,0.001527216,0.546363,0.020549364,0.000015534557,0.00007803921,0.00006008754,0.06995602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28028628,0.4303676,0.005471016,0.14717749,0.050803665,0.000053060237,0.00008328273,0.0001888243,0.085568815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980089,0.0008171497,0.000069257796,0.0003793138,0.00060127786,0.0001240723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502206,0.002901077,0.00021911754,0.00012466,0.00077579,0.0009573354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030715726,0.00047427663,0.00046657756,0.0015085118,0.0012390292,0.0033110909,0.0006748401,0.0020881502,0.0050869323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008983438,0.00038541472,0.00019875645,0.0007861924,0.0046979752,0.0031792102,0.0017394588,0.004633673,0.00096369284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012280035,0.000107873,0.003441255,0.00041137854,0.00004512285,0.0005825645,0.0022057022,0.00066254823,0.0007177354,0.13311161,0.6636484,0.19494306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081384,0.000029584728,0.0018709442,0.00041195328,0.000004695564,0.000342806,0.00037956907,0.0001085969,0.00010501458,0.018591156,0.97812426,0.000023245448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010732388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017272951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010732388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023637929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016914273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021339834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090349066","doi":"10.1071/wr13211","title":"Reproductive seasonality in African ungulates in relation to rainfall","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Livestock Research Institute; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of British Columbia; Universität Hohenheim; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ungulate; Fecundity; Seasonality; Ecology; Biology; Forage; Wet season; Context (archaeology); Phenology; Dry season; Geography; Population; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0401490268679958,"score_gpt":0.3222859526010739,"score_spread":0.2821369257330781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090349066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994241,0.0001544766,0.00007091804,0.0000072995495,5.989162e-7,0.0000020361063,0.00008970148,0.0000022592558,0.00024859805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996772,0.00007789688,0.000080330596,0.0000038650055,0.0000021858245,0.0000031889813,0.00009979529,0.0000011251198,0.00005459644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992037,0.000022622293,0.000006775273,0.00002345657,0.0000082348315,0.000018568862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937785,0.00017748168,0.0003345959,0.00002608445,0.00003848332,0.00004546099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002519822,0.0000958403,0.00014988155,0.0007372041,0.0001937188,0.00022181025,0.00012391066,0.000116688665,0.0012075474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012861069,0.00008902895,0.00008022131,0.00061929366,0.00026449014,0.0001562524,0.00025283388,0.000114553266,0.00007770125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011178475,0.000015549724,0.98940945,0.000032875876,0.000033352608,0.00010983349,0.0005231934,0.0003217932,0.0044900402,0.00008100081,0.00005672847,0.00481432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.04343e-7,0.00001703011,0.9995522,0.0000030488668,0.000003403677,0.000072614166,0.00009323987,0.00013237367,0.000051058352,0.000017999324,0.000055388708,0.0000010174027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041908678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009166651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041908678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016880849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009732929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008332908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091283353","doi":"10.1071/wr05101","title":"Diet of a native carnivore, the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), before and after an intense wildfire","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Predation; Ecology; Biology; Marsupial; Carnivore; Bandicoot; Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.022873773612239603,"score_gpt":0.3124786063002092,"score_spread":0.2896048326879696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091283353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99990606,0.000014986127,0.0000057566294,0.0000038064854,8.3413335e-7,9.4892533e-7,0.000029046241,2.8845113e-7,0.000038232596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994703,0.00003177868,0.000050993247,0.000017198712,0.0000019951947,0.0000032181945,0.00012218478,5.5733545e-7,0.00030176406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999936,0.000014319478,0.0000054838038,0.000017758039,0.000010997904,0.000015527705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996326,0.000043851203,0.00012298714,0.000016364398,0.00005101495,0.00013315048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023007987,0.00016143324,0.00021131721,0.00033480325,0.00036270104,0.00031015568,0.00014400629,0.00023139964,0.0006204649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041971152,0.00014738047,0.00014418244,0.00018730563,0.00028178087,0.00022776451,0.00021649308,0.00022496696,0.00016496144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045556205,0.00017813477,0.98398465,0.000027849368,0.00005256657,0.00030040112,0.0009012253,0.000042252974,0.010888994,0.000013929937,0.0001011603,0.0030532705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018349253,0.00022924147,0.9992706,0.0000015611009,0.0000047870058,0.00008461745,0.00021058459,0.000039847255,0.0000846411,0.0000019703907,0.000068948895,0.0000013112108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015056822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072473176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015056822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037827928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018488026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02993834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098775316","doi":"10.1071/wr04111","title":"Mortality and survivorship of the quokka (Setonix brachyurus) (Macropodidae : Marsupialia) in the northern jarrah forest of Western Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Survivorship curve; Biology; Threatened species; Population; Juvenile; Ecology; Predation; Demography; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.12154441869221905,"score_gpt":0.3697939848967447,"score_spread":0.24824956620452565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098775316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99987566,0.000027294696,0.000010456956,0.0000041507797,4.3468924e-7,0.0000012456438,0.00002733815,3.6357005e-7,0.000053006697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955505,0.000042224314,0.00003608487,0.000004958389,0.0000012459287,0.0000036411766,0.00007504033,3.7249146e-7,0.00028134877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998778,0.000020856745,0.000011431877,0.000030131714,0.000026597763,0.00003312457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954957,0.00004470598,0.00021043677,0.000019941175,0.000058196427,0.00011719789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022597067,0.00017425284,0.0001428053,0.00045853617,0.0003497162,0.00025357233,0.00028481352,0.00025700007,0.0007552951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071617775,0.0001875612,0.00014754412,0.0002523871,0.00038181312,0.00033782353,0.0003991269,0.00022897951,0.00022704639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100812365,0.000050908635,0.9907354,0.000020237872,0.00003104883,0.00022457208,0.0017715214,0.00008059706,0.0026489277,0.00001798175,0.0000927748,0.0042251376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010058424,0.00005954988,0.999481,0.0000018766358,0.0000039323954,0.00007708591,0.00021526204,0.00007200624,0.000038922888,0.0000037353907,0.00004422806,0.0000014141523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04455512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11689398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04455512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005999683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016852898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088591576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100531623","doi":"10.1071/wr14069","title":"Using novel spatial mark–resight techniques to monitor resident Canada geese in a suburban environment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; North Carolina Department of Transportation; North Carolina State University","keywords":"Goose; Geography; Context (archaeology); Waterfowl; Population; Wildlife management; Wildlife; Flyway; Range (aeronautics); Branta; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Habitat; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08906570813751805,"score_gpt":0.32867245969574865,"score_spread":0.2396067515582306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100531623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776153,0.00013652108,0.020076655,0.000055761822,0.0000057090356,0.00011281076,0.0004996401,0.000085800544,0.0014117184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951779,0.00018523527,0.046375792,0.00007125537,0.000008530059,0.00015138244,0.0005206678,0.000011907548,0.0008962264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961036,0.00006673607,0.00001692059,0.00013311602,0.00012786817,0.000044977824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901474,0.000121259596,0.00043245594,0.000092935996,0.00028316063,0.000055413067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047304717,0.00024050502,0.00014136713,0.0007703761,0.0003456583,0.00028474157,0.0004762995,0.00018206691,0.0005278224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010095711,0.000117485746,0.00016493943,0.00062098255,0.00029364513,0.0003475371,0.0003524299,0.00019814378,0.00014568924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000911717,0.00011781943,0.9151232,0.00007916196,0.00011969787,0.00023784615,0.00087860064,0.003182571,0.025635442,0.00021349567,0.00076225935,0.053558685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012088171,0.00023635497,0.9731837,0.000018019071,0.00009234624,0.0005864384,0.000896643,0.014691116,0.0072238217,0.00014386943,0.002875129,0.000040363095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1739534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48063037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8260466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000599457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011195099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34588176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103538233","doi":"10.1071/wr01074","title":"Beyond population regulation and limitation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Population growth; Population size; Density dependence; Population density; Ecology; Empirical research; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0936369518061008,"score_gpt":0.34264733844678125,"score_spread":0.24901038664068045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103538233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057733204,0.091179855,0.24804415,0.2551835,0.0048833056,0.00032134718,0.0004881208,0.0003441833,0.34182242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8393962,0.033118214,0.036548566,0.05380965,0.006494431,0.0010089197,0.00029277522,0.0002567954,0.029074531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872606,0.005175554,0.0006384017,0.0033680429,0.0027900576,0.00076741737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686628,0.017982604,0.0026436846,0.005868421,0.0037686268,0.0010739156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017913796,0.000750072,0.002107356,0.001800602,0.0024265076,0.004810743,0.003457589,0.0052573523,0.006092836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038713492,0.00042497512,0.0012631471,0.0015232487,0.031129085,0.015716074,0.007708953,0.006427478,0.0011110017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022468063,0.000029565303,0.003516182,0.00042728256,0.000048667833,0.0001379617,0.0016851024,0.001457786,0.00047919503,0.9479865,0.0054921675,0.038717125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001307049,0.000070820315,0.0024838788,0.00064160896,0.00003227,0.00044517504,0.0009342894,0.0015761707,0.0003898291,0.8671165,0.12625723,0.000039203675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029583077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001450771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017913796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003459106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037572144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094738364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105578339","doi":"10.1071/wr08109","title":"DNA genotypes reveal red fox (Vulpes vulpes) abundance, response to lethal control and limitations of contemporary survey techniques","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Rabies epidemiology and control","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Vulpes; Transect; Biology; Population; Genotyping; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Abundance (ecology); Veterinary medicine; Zoology; Genotype; Demography; Genetics; Medicine","score_opus":0.11279827769070393,"score_gpt":0.3636689807068016,"score_spread":0.25087070301609765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105578339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809967,0.0011298418,0.0141227,0.00013253314,0.00002555697,0.000042526215,0.00040578877,0.0000850369,0.0030591513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841892,0.0005483688,0.013122326,0.00011868461,0.00002276874,0.000070031936,0.00035453922,0.000018745852,0.0015553936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971457,0.0009696748,0.00017000332,0.00075371284,0.00082521536,0.00013577496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995432,0.0012469002,0.0019496386,0.00058655837,0.00064992934,0.00013499762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031308357,0.00037129127,0.00029193258,0.0006376958,0.0003821988,0.00049874047,0.00036942423,0.00048075596,0.0009171225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033507645,0.00023103038,0.00021529174,0.00031098325,0.0005612238,0.00034297892,0.0004232823,0.00030476117,0.00047227446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017477122,0.00010355603,0.7330559,0.00019026335,0.00014514657,0.00012279161,0.000983916,0.00038703938,0.20328328,0.00023266001,0.00036415918,0.060956493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003096464,0.0006004617,0.9668871,0.000050338214,0.0000794251,0.0007287432,0.0005316887,0.0006769121,0.027878037,0.00010115798,0.0024485847,0.00001438899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014798569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009855592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031308357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003666759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019042859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016557634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105873807","doi":"10.1071/wr09046","title":"Predator-baiting experiments for the conservation of rock-wallabies in Western Australia: a 25-year review with recent advances","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Marsupial; Biology; Endangered species; Ecology; Predator; Threatened species; Wildlife management; Fauna; Wildlife; Habitat","score_opus":0.17208974208478117,"score_gpt":0.43479119180527215,"score_spread":0.262701449720491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105873807","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008932783,0.9995509,0.000049655497,0.00005511248,0.000043167,0.000009049813,0.000009855609,0.0000032227695,0.00018962767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00040955635,0.9991627,0.00015237588,0.00008056506,0.000031835138,0.000009415772,0.000014582765,0.0000011397253,0.00013783603],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995322,0.000090449554,0.000117356576,0.00008017423,0.00015746681,0.00002226825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983866,0.00091142533,0.00032221392,0.00003492468,0.00027913443,0.00006582325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018841514,0.0012817535,0.002617878,0.0039247656,0.00031376389,0.0007773515,0.0013968099,0.0012990073,0.002597825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026517212,0.0006216919,0.000996013,0.0032373094,0.0005915423,0.0016295849,0.00069232297,0.0009476592,0.00097310374],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010906039,0.00009547662,0.00028485927,0.080302775,0.00028815662,0.0001350688,0.0000860901,0.00024467456,0.0013281469,0.0008526879,0.011921576,0.9043513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008158803,0.0005806739,0.006183234,0.044655908,0.0015574882,0.0014756335,0.00015793853,0.00026489334,0.0015904662,0.0013098266,0.94207036,0.00007210576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037319683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007211874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039247656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083659287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018213296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009964466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106156459","doi":"10.1071/wr13209","title":"Fertilisation, cattle grazing and voles: collapse of meadow vole populations in young forests?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Population cycle; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Grazing; Microtus; Biology; Population; Vole; Vegetation (pathology); Understory; Demography","score_opus":0.20133025131306745,"score_gpt":0.40250287797484363,"score_spread":0.20117262666177618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106156459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994974,0.0002213883,0.000018876599,0.000054618286,0.0000011934485,8.3256805e-7,0.000038132395,0.000001312349,0.00016635784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979645,0.00007174603,0.00001488382,0.000020670464,0.000003385807,6.924514e-7,0.000036384266,3.5607852e-7,0.000055521832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999887,0.00003148306,0.000007783781,0.00002693395,0.000015316602,0.000031554424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993892,0.00010592964,0.00025490907,0.00002147474,0.000053002586,0.00017538317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044340335,0.00008668213,0.00017637343,0.00032147882,0.0004079945,0.00057971553,0.00028722544,0.0002848735,0.0008762401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012091773,0.00010762919,0.00008413007,0.00029369103,0.00070100534,0.0002928525,0.00020967209,0.00019954336,0.00007592271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057524896,0.000011326514,0.99687934,0.000009382311,0.000016872302,0.00008264025,0.00018479218,0.000061629275,0.00056185556,0.000029961157,0.00007553483,0.0020291004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.6380144e-7,0.000011712459,0.99962735,0.000002263766,0.0000028899553,0.000034535253,0.00016089274,0.000054420256,0.000022281989,0.00001813947,0.0000640144,6.8668385e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04792292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14948699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04792292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000518798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033851922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09528792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108997345","doi":"10.1071/wr08069","title":"Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Vulpes; Transect; Wildlife; Biology; Wildlife management; Zoology; Marten; Wildlife conservation; Microsatellite; Ecology; Habitat; Predation","score_opus":0.20089697103327792,"score_gpt":0.47911234609686865,"score_spread":0.27821537506359073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108997345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819713,0.0059343176,0.009700649,0.00020598914,0.00003382177,0.00065619947,0.000114042596,0.000035549074,0.0013480417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242843,0.0043030186,0.069728106,0.0001815536,0.00005515974,0.00033212075,0.00022217973,0.000044206852,0.00084940926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846805,0.010610771,0.00090985483,0.0014593506,0.0019474808,0.00039204725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538318,0.032065254,0.0033023448,0.0015920969,0.008617393,0.00059115427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030260546,0.0014013555,0.0009982113,0.0031959948,0.00091079774,0.00097416685,0.0011850495,0.0014758201,0.00032755555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026158486,0.0006078384,0.0013363034,0.0010132886,0.0008992091,0.0012975754,0.0010417358,0.00072399253,0.00022253877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017582832,0.0018681769,0.79852575,0.0027917132,0.0016599357,0.0017994023,0.0060441485,0.0027259083,0.013571712,0.0001974211,0.0003888878,0.16866864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019651216,0.02321046,0.9009657,0.0006729569,0.0023136714,0.011109134,0.0053275116,0.026655417,0.023982449,0.00037431787,0.004940708,0.0002511011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011330007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032552175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030260546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008078092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006216872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16003501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112507765","doi":"10.1071/wr11009","title":"Is the relationship between predator and prey abundances related to climate for lynx and snowshoe hares?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Department of Environment; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Canberra; Australian Academy of Science","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Context (archaeology); Snowshoe hare; Apex predator; Climate change; Biology; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.15749239556295644,"score_gpt":0.3651719144881467,"score_spread":0.20767951892519024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112507765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993038,0.00019886247,0.00011644733,0.00007828163,0.0000031297245,0.000001337017,0.00007696816,0.000002016534,0.00021903911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999744,0.000069534,0.00005366631,0.000022997529,0.0000046511227,0.0000010323678,0.00005309503,0.0000011248452,0.000049781884],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971956,0.00009595082,0.000023588056,0.000084976746,0.00002556187,0.00005041807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815947,0.00070216553,0.0006343383,0.00013483499,0.00016508753,0.00020411014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008094801,0.0001343243,0.00026707991,0.00041355495,0.00027906377,0.0005494077,0.00028868296,0.00039946244,0.0013545377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026106827,0.0001432999,0.0003160965,0.00041966853,0.0006867331,0.00048620073,0.00035364623,0.00026063508,0.00012259145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042470736,0.000008123077,0.9972952,0.000011288902,0.000079279445,0.000034053664,0.000082504426,0.00022418026,0.0011427116,0.000034133645,0.000028712317,0.0010172345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.092371e-7,0.000019472993,0.9992434,0.000001720733,0.00001567042,0.000035639307,0.00015750494,0.00035644713,0.000051143976,0.000061028644,0.00005516377,0.000002043456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016343355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028871903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016343355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004384322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038991135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032496452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114892621","doi":"10.1071/wr07055","title":"The projected distributions of Mastacomys fuscus and Rattus lutreolus in south-eastern Australia under a scenario of climate change: potential for increased competition?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Ecology; Altitude (triangle); Range (aeronautics); Competition (biology); Geography; Global warming; Fauna; Biology","score_opus":0.12333928947855564,"score_gpt":0.35372805928476847,"score_spread":0.2303887698062128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114892621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976107,0.00010738684,0.00034393018,0.00029719592,0.0000060172615,0.000009066466,0.00053223025,0.000013371233,0.0010801286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999158,0.0000690285,0.0002708099,0.000030193267,0.0000022158133,0.000007637287,0.00020661906,0.0000015014291,0.00025397932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998535,0.000052369658,0.0000100399675,0.00003141558,0.000020319412,0.000032460983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961156,0.000043928594,0.000123908,0.000014690988,0.00011402645,0.000091827875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038021748,0.00024463903,0.00016403147,0.00034122934,0.00025311654,0.0005838444,0.0005088814,0.000740271,0.0022022359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012097129,0.0002789491,0.00041468142,0.00035041134,0.00035393462,0.0005248839,0.00047122425,0.00028938675,0.0002818959],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037428725,0.000086207816,0.9049128,0.0001929755,0.00020798853,0.0011707157,0.0007045877,0.07446389,0.006907757,0.0012466323,0.0012247496,0.008507344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023681716,0.00015022233,0.9239031,0.000035847683,0.0000558466,0.0003026104,0.000978651,0.07222287,0.00034528752,0.0004928072,0.0014621838,0.00002683101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08497442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12241454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08497442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015780808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068189664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16895962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116704660","doi":"10.1071/wr12185","title":"Using human-dimensions research to reduce implementation uncertainty for wildlife management: a case of moose (Alces alces) hunting in northern Ontario, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Wildlife; Wildlife management; Hunting season; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Population; Context (archaeology); Overexploitation; Population density; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Fishery; Demography; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11272193741117044,"score_gpt":0.4042986427010204,"score_spread":0.29157670528984997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116704660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94917923,0.0010774441,0.008431959,0.015006583,0.00003106253,0.0004215177,0.00012601109,0.00003909375,0.025687058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941314,0.00031886398,0.004252376,0.00036375635,0.00000747185,0.00005730891,0.000022755312,0.000004644349,0.0008413889],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908647,0.0048158662,0.0003055109,0.00052573124,0.0015972911,0.0018908582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788043,0.012214923,0.002278951,0.00095215824,0.003996833,0.0017528652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013798952,0.00035854755,0.00039851156,0.0011694301,0.008627791,0.004536836,0.00261147,0.001612546,0.0016361255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02779532,0.00026245494,0.00041853968,0.002362317,0.005776072,0.0018452668,0.0018339361,0.0015864922,0.000055730907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028588233,0.0006020675,0.44432542,0.00075678463,0.00026710317,0.011746744,0.2762521,0.024425838,0.0012901953,0.043485913,0.007935988,0.18862589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009890255,0.0006184305,0.32761988,0.0011497525,0.00027327685,0.0013412184,0.5184351,0.060629465,0.0013824637,0.023308525,0.06492219,0.00022083671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95978343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0785896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0785896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097329594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57021016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116975893","doi":"10.1071/wr13058","title":"Characteristics of refugia used by the threatened Australian growling grass frog (Litoria raniformis) during a prolonged drought","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Riparian zone; Occupancy; Ecology; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Lake ecosystem; River ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.032731389839839684,"score_gpt":0.29682683056002607,"score_spread":0.26409544072018637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116975893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997415,0.000020334097,0.000031146155,0.0000044923595,3.8848165e-7,0.0000024749002,0.00004256318,0.0000012589519,0.00015591772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999752,0.000016125376,0.00005260851,0.0000046139653,9.062176e-7,0.0000033861859,0.000070538284,7.132723e-7,0.00009920606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997663,0.00006668814,0.000023699196,0.000061194194,0.00003511404,0.00004699306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990891,0.00015139997,0.00046693845,0.00004353111,0.00006789144,0.00018108719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003882937,0.000118891774,0.0002121429,0.00055043295,0.00036260873,0.00031662674,0.00024438166,0.00022894326,0.0013824787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011317477,0.00011558986,0.00015289804,0.0003006106,0.00043047502,0.00028280876,0.00042583895,0.00019778154,0.00021993325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004732066,0.000020645028,0.99526703,0.000012914462,0.000017397775,0.000114616574,0.00077472255,0.00009165453,0.0017684388,0.000018957793,0.00004380709,0.0018224395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.9345897e-7,0.00004184786,0.999318,0.0000019487181,0.000002637644,0.00012304216,0.0003156862,0.00009757795,0.000033801567,0.000004863929,0.000058115846,0.0000019231352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065497807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021428246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065497807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019607642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011032886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013023317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122140032","doi":"10.1071/wr08086","title":"Small mammal populations in a eucalypt forest affected by fire and drought. I. Long-term patterns in an era of climate change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; Ian Potter Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Fauna; Mammal; Population; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Biodiversity; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.09262782879171857,"score_gpt":0.3444392687688883,"score_spread":0.2518114399771697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122140032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999846,0.000034247856,0.000011086081,0.0000037398313,4.6937458e-7,0.0000013048519,0.000033281674,4.5304057e-7,0.000069450034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996413,0.00004409212,0.00004992229,0.000008651672,0.0000016220932,0.000003427212,0.00012659868,3.8000937e-7,0.0001238864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991584,0.000013513144,0.000007820465,0.000022120708,0.00001323074,0.000027370372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973434,0.000016764789,0.0001236134,0.000010063176,0.000037747188,0.000077456185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012441432,0.00011352585,0.00013588594,0.00047659857,0.00033170497,0.00027066027,0.0001787612,0.00019855548,0.00035239325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031684988,0.000106088715,0.00010452225,0.00035741742,0.00026557088,0.0002841677,0.00033751593,0.00017641345,0.00010356623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006736419,0.000032952074,0.9931346,0.000012489175,0.000020821974,0.00019258344,0.00068424793,0.000040187228,0.0033968664,0.000010368623,0.00003363191,0.0023737682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.1243074e-7,0.000022253173,0.99955016,0.000001098791,0.0000025508364,0.00008662594,0.00021893915,0.000030110954,0.000039146744,0.0000025556724,0.000045351902,7.046286e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018745838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018745838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040727755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001433696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037273467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122227317","doi":"10.1071/wr11175","title":"Detection and stratification approaches for aerial surveys of deer in prairie–parklands","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Prion Research Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wildlife; Aerial survey; Survey methodology; Population; Odocoileus; Sampling (signal processing); Geography; Statistics; Wildlife management; Sampling design; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Cartography; Mathematics; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.12990901836553595,"score_gpt":0.33314491318833167,"score_spread":0.20323589482279572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122227317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8779425,0.00022676672,0.120365545,0.00007580197,0.000006720869,0.00032755305,0.00013303329,0.0001212507,0.0008008467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94449127,0.000056754347,0.055010304,0.00001678225,0.0000022320833,0.00017669798,0.0001235762,0.0000062391246,0.00011612676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724495,0.0019377678,0.000100082325,0.00040167908,0.00020928688,0.00010633661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942748,0.0032573072,0.0014098397,0.0005405517,0.0004148854,0.00010267915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064073354,0.00029985153,0.00029983238,0.0007531407,0.00041198594,0.00047144282,0.0006532313,0.00035164488,0.00053117564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013471184,0.00039080577,0.0005260996,0.0004415723,0.0008100217,0.00042717898,0.0005521504,0.00034762555,0.0000775373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005288094,0.00019579109,0.57783145,0.00027784696,0.00047085676,0.0001182267,0.0016453953,0.2579514,0.008218297,0.003391454,0.00055311347,0.14881732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012145345,0.00085726415,0.4157968,0.00010255575,0.00017149029,0.0001427658,0.0005236814,0.570848,0.0034860324,0.0066035776,0.0012839907,0.0000624226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02938474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04921861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02938474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016447721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009227246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058427393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124739769","doi":"10.1071/wr12168","title":"Seasons of the ringed seal: pelagic open-water hyperphagy, benthic feeding over winter and spring fasting during molt","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nunavut Wildlife Management Board; ArcticNet","keywords":"Phoca; Blubber; Pelagic zone; Biology; Foraging; Context (archaeology); Arctic; Benthic zone; Bay; Seasonality; δ13C; Ecology; Fishery; Oceanography; Stable isotope ratio","score_opus":0.05484123731665384,"score_gpt":0.3139490860243298,"score_spread":0.25910784870767595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124739769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992386,0.00021075485,0.000048874674,0.00001608097,0.00000483493,0.0000039331853,0.00018230635,0.0000034334132,0.00029110478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992976,0.00009051521,0.00008777697,0.000017795885,0.00000830495,0.000007914496,0.0002370229,0.0000019232775,0.0002510119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999199,0.000008689917,0.000008786652,0.000032441563,0.00001277937,0.000017339711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996575,0.000023546363,0.00019988752,0.000012404155,0.000038853166,0.00006778795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019372914,0.0001489008,0.00017692556,0.00036559036,0.00032302234,0.00032310793,0.00010942288,0.00014120869,0.0012659975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031582417,0.0001225239,0.00016875281,0.00023067955,0.00028006273,0.00020184401,0.0003238342,0.00014637977,0.00021819839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003694793,0.000064312226,0.97999483,0.000056333865,0.0000568963,0.00022885713,0.0004956506,0.000057496305,0.013023726,0.000029521578,0.00027449738,0.0053482223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.4024437e-7,0.000039304323,0.99966013,0.0000020153898,0.0000031252976,0.000044518314,0.00008363606,0.000016109168,0.000077276985,0.0000037775194,0.00006859544,7.66922e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005957651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018764164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005957651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027165274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020368685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011845946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126376142","doi":"10.1071/wr06171","title":"Evaluation of predator numerical responses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Yukon Department of Environment; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Canberra","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Numerical response; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Population; Density dependence; Snowshoe hare; Population density; Trophic level; Functional response; Demography","score_opus":0.12652112001233626,"score_gpt":0.41181542270881555,"score_spread":0.28529430269647926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126376142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99614644,0.00009918321,0.0012515683,0.000017972137,0.0000049429464,0.000053897267,0.0004530635,0.000031604115,0.001941217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970613,0.00006963762,0.0013380009,0.000014500063,0.0000025877684,0.00006109041,0.0004155382,0.0000066318294,0.0010306463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994784,0.000092909984,0.000038560225,0.00009379098,0.0002288902,0.00006741121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979062,0.0008328316,0.00026450894,0.00010713731,0.00070713187,0.00018218206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001099655,0.00031293608,0.00033697224,0.000589295,0.00032178944,0.0003917726,0.00033320446,0.0003404516,0.0022953618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004824694,0.00011175961,0.00033380918,0.0003466838,0.00031800984,0.00030457554,0.000384093,0.00023211181,0.0003216177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00133247,0.00029173403,0.8393841,0.00034555496,0.00014268926,0.00025688132,0.0009916545,0.013847049,0.10074474,0.00045308558,0.00035231042,0.041857734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001647661,0.001192453,0.9662662,0.000018158786,0.000045695615,0.00013400456,0.0005915386,0.019246757,0.011366747,0.0002564261,0.0008397487,0.00002583265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023214407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029916024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023214407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015467516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005289657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046158552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126725199","doi":"10.1071/wr09006","title":"The transmission rate of MCMV in house mice in pens: implications for virally vectored immunocontraception","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Grains Research and Development Corporation","keywords":"Transmission (telecommunications); Strain (injury); Biology; House mice; Transmission rate; Outbreak; Virology; Veterinary medicine; House mouse; Horizontal transmission; Zoology; Virus; Anatomy","score_opus":0.06271237663927479,"score_gpt":0.38454221982569475,"score_spread":0.32182984318641994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126725199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970266,0.0005196948,0.0010425099,0.00009589425,0.000009369015,0.000023609336,0.0004211544,0.000018884191,0.0008422184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832994,0.00019889881,0.00071688223,0.000046931007,0.000005124277,0.000019668441,0.0002501592,0.000007873385,0.00042448338],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963295,0.00011513485,0.000030122754,0.00009969052,0.000060446386,0.00006160238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856323,0.0005247938,0.0005268503,0.000119996344,0.00012817023,0.00013692988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066449324,0.0004002715,0.0003097039,0.0005975033,0.00018616187,0.00053945725,0.00061310775,0.00058338104,0.001096763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012944124,0.00026666035,0.00036980901,0.0003080592,0.00029006018,0.0005300981,0.00015975496,0.00063299056,0.00021505788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016591623,0.00051493855,0.2274324,0.00030578324,0.00014692223,0.0006246205,0.00040743794,0.0050419415,0.74658656,0.0011027389,0.00041992945,0.01575753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058907037,0.0035076935,0.71030736,0.00008637693,0.00017202283,0.0019772055,0.0006588784,0.030071555,0.2507431,0.0010169141,0.0012868799,0.00011311472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043898285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032261822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043898285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077803415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021503838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008728564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127007647","doi":"10.1071/wr09060","title":"Predicting the ecological impact of cane toads (Bufo marinus) on threatened camaenid land snails in north-western Australia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Threatened species; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Introduced species","score_opus":0.078420037191881,"score_gpt":0.37432857750993626,"score_spread":0.29590854031805525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127007647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998124,0.000013975198,0.000023407067,0.000007631088,2.5985946e-7,0.000004574866,0.00001262129,5.667382e-7,0.00012463325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964774,0.000039910334,0.00015023627,0.0000074047957,5.439947e-7,0.000007124165,0.00004455973,2.5689138e-7,0.000102106555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980193,0.00008615378,0.000013495276,0.000030654373,0.000026314538,0.00004145326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990563,0.00031646853,0.00033596653,0.000024698888,0.00008319928,0.00018329981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005100345,0.0002457052,0.00014503155,0.00038769597,0.00027016678,0.0004102984,0.00025196513,0.000299935,0.0007574297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017643177,0.00018040965,0.00015716824,0.00015100118,0.00033344468,0.0004921526,0.00039956698,0.00024637868,0.00011940623],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009402155,0.00015668501,0.9925222,0.0000251149,0.000026128344,0.0000696334,0.00018056983,0.0024755471,0.0014593567,0.000024607794,0.0000513856,0.0029147677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008232067,0.00032007822,0.99246067,0.000009013264,0.000012750671,0.000041767515,0.00056935387,0.006243649,0.00018892936,0.00003489061,0.0001075342,0.0000031894801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03655976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11408845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03655976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006459105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028347765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072693944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128769951","doi":"10.1071/wr11079","title":"Efficacy of SpayVac® is excellent: a comment on Gray et al. (2010)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Immunovaccine (Canada); ASL Environmental Sciences (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Liposome; Gray (unit); Zona pellucida; Virology; Biology; Zoology; Medicine; Fishery","score_opus":0.10111081863496167,"score_gpt":0.3887171038299361,"score_spread":0.2876062851949744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128769951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048657315,0.0050932677,0.00025570433,0.9660215,0.02587432,0.00001810277,0.00019781735,0.00009749563,0.0019552626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002263633,0.0011833501,0.00031444716,0.97885954,0.015287963,0.00002675468,0.000024417724,0.000031772786,0.0020082227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890758,0.0020754286,0.002026648,0.002378268,0.0034126525,0.0010310996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585406,0.025455903,0.0028368172,0.0014617592,0.009516262,0.0021886465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012516493,0.0015898129,0.0027829623,0.0008667975,0.003911677,0.0032000807,0.007252502,0.08764653,0.0067234733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04036708,0.0012922229,0.003047376,0.0012353767,0.008615271,0.006340946,0.0022281725,0.07531058,0.009959441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022160799,0.000039787785,0.000531953,0.00034039357,0.00005963116,0.0009906411,0.00037655482,0.000117134,0.0008036338,0.0047204355,0.98074603,0.011052179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010863752,0.00016995509,0.0018781302,0.0008599818,0.0000991224,0.0009744688,0.0004726924,0.00025566694,0.0012376984,0.008202718,0.9855967,0.00014417163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021871656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021910755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08764653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059521697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057620984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066194355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132388284","doi":"10.1071/wr10177","title":"A review of the effects of different marking and tagging techniques on marine mammals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Aquarium; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Wildlife; Biology; Ecology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.08217227647345204,"score_gpt":0.3731076315736664,"score_spread":0.29093535510021434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132388284","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013457633,0.9993067,0.000036898535,0.00009941716,0.0001373085,0.0000068155064,0.00003358417,0.000003350114,0.00024132797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000547638,0.9988451,0.00014360504,0.00014622192,0.00011398477,0.000009513603,0.000036400434,0.0000016220013,0.00015582948],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879456,0.00025694264,0.0004080348,0.00016002297,0.00033005964,0.000050316306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961681,0.002385387,0.00065571186,0.000055515568,0.0006282815,0.000106893196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015890163,0.0012220639,0.0024799884,0.0072404887,0.00036160005,0.0012787216,0.0011231679,0.0011293284,0.0041915923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040649185,0.0005842263,0.0015892613,0.0077111456,0.0004883857,0.0017684443,0.0005630551,0.00091569143,0.0010692909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021838034,0.00010886291,0.0005021812,0.332449,0.0006221255,0.00025542316,0.00027277117,0.00021299247,0.001933058,0.00061953405,0.027320622,0.635485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062807005,0.0007776171,0.0125038065,0.22692427,0.0028544557,0.0029732527,0.00038053346,0.00008309332,0.00083869236,0.0007814405,0.7517475,0.00007253946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030540961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071758595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072404887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087977346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002236811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01402235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133607498","doi":"10.1071/wr15064","title":"Mixed stock analysis of a resident green turtle, Chelonia mydas, population in New Caledonia links rookeries in the South Pacific","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"New Zealand Aid Programme; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Marine Fisheries Service; Griffith University","keywords":"Rookery; Fishery; Foraging; Population; mtDNA control region; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Sea turtle; Turtle (robot); Demography","score_opus":0.12759678863397536,"score_gpt":0.3395149088406152,"score_spread":0.21191812020663983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133607498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999553,0.00006432976,0.000042401174,0.000008018404,0.0000018183056,0.000004142905,0.00016969416,0.0000012138869,0.00015539612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891853,0.000064409636,0.00021080332,0.00001724098,0.0000015753378,0.000011891665,0.00052209833,0.0000013489287,0.00025210035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998276,0.000022113272,0.000018986142,0.00006618099,0.000031006723,0.000034160454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993349,0.00007396569,0.00025226123,0.00006350933,0.00014265937,0.00013262006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047940575,0.00020325945,0.0001378911,0.0011564828,0.0004898702,0.000518016,0.0004761885,0.0001525782,0.00051791134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007949766,0.00016475629,0.00018697072,0.0007376247,0.00035790942,0.00024027488,0.00056792167,0.00019070659,0.00009058463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023354354,0.000008479904,0.995811,0.000008163229,0.000027980173,0.00012561055,0.00055910315,0.00004831379,0.00088368024,0.000012520384,0.00009260156,0.0023992131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.977272e-7,0.000008695633,0.99931216,0.00000549987,0.0000069782877,0.00004694449,0.00044011092,0.00006436789,0.000033006996,0.000002716181,0.000077904384,9.252663e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13473335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3699994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13473335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009104646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005135373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2678982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135771269","doi":"10.1071/wr07082","title":"Differential space use inferred from live trapping versus telemetry: northern flying squirrels and fine spatial grain","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; Government of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Telemetry; Wildlife; Home range; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Sampling (signal processing); Trap (plumbing); Wildlife management; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14036601391546868,"score_gpt":0.3405596206132572,"score_spread":0.2001936066977885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135771269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99969745,0.000021853612,0.00012972427,0.0000024119406,4.1200286e-7,0.0000011761363,0.000028695831,0.0000014384509,0.00011685683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997086,0.000011175256,0.00012643139,0.0000037712373,0.0000012447257,0.0000019652048,0.00009420086,0.0000011371854,0.000051566298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959224,0.000114100716,0.000036631915,0.00014051785,0.000069285496,0.000047296613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984156,0.0005335338,0.00065555127,0.00015819515,0.000108203356,0.00012896917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075796986,0.00026875123,0.00024363089,0.0008382737,0.00017976521,0.00053441693,0.00016614869,0.0002263273,0.00066251017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024464792,0.00017943847,0.00025586394,0.00041443936,0.0005079812,0.00046185913,0.00048297376,0.00015583965,0.00015801121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015185746,0.000026863392,0.9885872,0.000018092422,0.00006180446,0.00005081409,0.00048568094,0.00018738447,0.007613669,0.000022646414,0.000011587524,0.0027825274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.231323e-7,0.00006238505,0.9992291,0.0000017967054,0.000008511916,0.000054350345,0.00011048795,0.00028081078,0.00021129803,0.00001812894,0.000020401643,0.0000017882198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049317544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012738632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049317544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017268976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010421453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009806097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136663220","doi":"10.1071/wr07053","title":"Philopatry and site fidelity of New Zealand sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Philopatry; Biological dispersal; Threatened species; Ecology; Biology; Population; Habitat; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.08509229325081591,"score_gpt":0.33109241491592145,"score_spread":0.24600012166510554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136663220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996712,0.000026103156,0.000012891781,0.0000078209905,8.0658583e-7,0.000001740935,0.00005255532,7.44107e-7,0.0002260705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993449,0.00002889005,0.000043057298,0.000014947436,0.0000012907418,0.000004988814,0.0001288109,8.097116e-7,0.0004321896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999119,0.000015873342,0.000007959209,0.000026188494,0.000017401611,0.000020622187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992945,0.000072701936,0.00039206125,0.000032364616,0.00006377967,0.00014463099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019818894,0.00011988952,0.00009339417,0.00036345667,0.0002225046,0.00033222337,0.00014288607,0.0001632496,0.001940119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081191235,0.000086226886,0.00011142208,0.00018707807,0.00030082164,0.00022406828,0.0002831808,0.0002198628,0.00020401788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036745834,0.000018528297,0.99661666,0.000007377051,0.000016044878,0.000060644972,0.0005243237,0.000021373136,0.0012328638,0.0000069206535,0.000059015878,0.001399616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.1060758e-7,0.00002499088,0.9996412,0.0000015952035,0.0000016220914,0.00004129174,0.0002062863,0.00001569413,0.000020134064,0.0000015822765,0.000044326953,9.151236e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02872871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11515958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02872871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002619959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011352823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057123005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140691215","doi":"10.1071/wr08079","title":"Combining a map-based public survey with an estimation of site occupancy to determine the recent and changing distribution of the koala in New South Wales","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phascolarctos cinereus; Occupancy; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Wildlife management; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Fauna; Conservation biology; Species distribution; Scale (ratio); Biodiversity; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Biology; Population; Environmental science","score_opus":0.0759408815929056,"score_gpt":0.31717118302884534,"score_spread":0.24123030143593974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140691215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99577326,0.00004035164,0.002582494,0.000024734753,0.0000027420854,0.0000327776,0.0001968018,0.000021026575,0.0013258165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943585,0.000065881584,0.0046549244,0.000014820381,0.000003682385,0.00005218471,0.00032521458,0.0000051919155,0.0005196609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926573,0.00035173408,0.000045363908,0.00010887841,0.00014505516,0.000083120976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984585,0.00043233164,0.0003581676,0.00020370977,0.0004529708,0.00009435515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096912717,0.00016963415,0.0002536468,0.0018876276,0.00024719327,0.000591747,0.00033125083,0.00023114406,0.0005676705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025694403,0.00028974563,0.00019468258,0.0012565277,0.0002950111,0.0005845546,0.00082290254,0.00022856834,0.00027807074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064577114,0.000072912284,0.9571773,0.000073186486,0.00007594841,0.00015475061,0.0013071917,0.0016522268,0.0039997445,0.000078447134,0.00026458743,0.03507908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040013956,0.00011283701,0.99219066,0.000018477687,0.000034240034,0.00018688946,0.0014584777,0.0045987847,0.0006020554,0.000048988713,0.00073045865,0.000014182027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06117883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15167262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06117883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005597534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005444683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12164545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141667431","doi":"10.1071/wr11076","title":"Winter severity index using widely available weather information","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Cryospheric studies and observations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Society of Professional Biologists","keywords":"Snowpack; Snow; Environmental science; Climate change; Context (archaeology); Physical geography; Weather station; Spatial ecology; Index (typography); Climatology; Geography; Ecology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.12088871767965768,"score_gpt":0.32309697322742587,"score_spread":0.20220825554776817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141667431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81307644,0.000377149,0.059432533,0.00015346562,0.00008940684,0.00059117115,0.09688646,0.0021075371,0.027285913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162787,0.00034424782,0.024927216,0.000037161215,0.000035510242,0.0001648251,0.054139867,0.000088360845,0.0039839623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971324,0.000027191594,0.000040968396,0.000075974414,0.00010358883,0.00003902873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993344,0.00007448721,0.00013972842,0.00010124823,0.00029662458,0.000053505755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040108775,0.0005399143,0.00032201596,0.0017037855,0.00021931005,0.0006402724,0.0004666145,0.00014534,0.0037463652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016740472,0.00011938801,0.0005681146,0.0021887848,0.00010598922,0.00046924927,0.0003824337,0.0002865146,0.0013195253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108416076,0.00007562934,0.858236,0.00015740725,0.00031972805,0.00014315346,0.00016957536,0.048828796,0.0034005677,0.0009510656,0.007644031,0.079965666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021437874,0.000052756357,0.87613684,0.000037832287,0.00007877942,0.000107577085,0.0001842439,0.10999031,0.0014016503,0.0007764536,0.011175628,0.000036463367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34041864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4878777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34041864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012409496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001421927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6768744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142250007","doi":"10.1071/wr07081","title":"Some human, aircraft and animal factors affecting aerial surveys: how to enumerate animals from the air","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fleming College","funders":"","keywords":"Aerial survey; Wildlife; Salience (neuroscience); Dingo; Aerial imagery; Enumeration; Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Remote sensing; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08267940010888417,"score_gpt":0.31815796765131427,"score_spread":0.2354785675424301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142250007","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25058693,0.52007246,0.15883374,0.03298619,0.0022761107,0.0012155463,0.0011189805,0.0004436398,0.03246632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42149615,0.36383328,0.19560437,0.004783878,0.0010750948,0.00075684546,0.0006311375,0.00012904115,0.011690128],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99188036,0.0044527515,0.0011404005,0.00054910086,0.0017896314,0.00018779708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95814735,0.027544485,0.005123215,0.0014473008,0.0074888635,0.0002487234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012096664,0.0005010625,0.00078879716,0.0017961243,0.0006539402,0.0020747315,0.0011007714,0.0009969111,0.001655673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05428219,0.0004981048,0.0005118962,0.0020653424,0.0023420034,0.0032480408,0.00085492467,0.0006488644,0.00095323427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006847417,0.00003208279,0.060242258,0.015500324,0.00019103296,0.00074796745,0.005861407,0.0009180525,0.003786351,0.0017963926,0.008170582,0.90268505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038539634,0.0010441883,0.57840955,0.026157677,0.0013684006,0.010065754,0.032471344,0.0042391745,0.020246534,0.013643747,0.31186962,0.00044540214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023462247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06432282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023462247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013443142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024978004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06397402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143622175","doi":"10.1071/wr10077","title":"An evaluation of hot-iron branding as a permanent marking method for adult New Zealand sea lions, Phocarctos hookeri","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Population; Demography; Biology; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.16032302953508115,"score_gpt":0.41867695689658063,"score_spread":0.2583539273614995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143622175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985116,0.0001594675,0.0007063571,0.00003118254,0.000014552695,0.000074428586,0.000086485525,0.000015030621,0.00040091423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936447,0.00030668173,0.004490933,0.000034863842,0.000018593748,0.00009198565,0.00018673581,0.0000063213124,0.0012192704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994418,0.00013936452,0.000042964464,0.00014845267,0.00019181894,0.000035483918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976937,0.00048295394,0.00092114054,0.00016244172,0.00054430077,0.00019548202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014031937,0.00037208622,0.00019454527,0.00036858825,0.00026184632,0.00032159808,0.00045981735,0.00034646163,0.0009797482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002346606,0.00013940272,0.0002925793,0.00014478795,0.00040230894,0.00038810458,0.00028531736,0.00025274348,0.000213806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054096524,0.0017364011,0.452865,0.0013648191,0.00021300207,0.0004859474,0.0027441124,0.0012635906,0.28960907,0.00016555729,0.0005704211,0.24357243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008750167,0.06471855,0.8845582,0.00013787518,0.00035825968,0.0009903515,0.001542106,0.0024407213,0.04272002,0.00006208313,0.002312869,0.00007144034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003872252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011497441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003872252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005194373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029329536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00769943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144489492","doi":"10.1071/wr09014","title":"Does habitat structure influence capture probabilities? A study of reptiles in a eucalypt forest","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Murdoch University","keywords":"Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Relative species abundance; Biodiversity; Biology; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02066719884520625,"score_gpt":0.30438623115543034,"score_spread":0.2837190323102241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144489492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997441,0.00003273081,0.000070998954,0.000009597994,2.9478818e-7,0.0000023932594,0.00002404803,7.2318267e-7,0.00011507651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976915,0.000023049837,0.00011414888,0.000005309933,9.827653e-7,0.0000025463733,0.000033553213,4.5826434e-7,0.000050905957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996728,0.00015289908,0.000016583928,0.00007105227,0.00003239957,0.000054261345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815375,0.0007250459,0.0006692256,0.0001473353,0.00012087672,0.00018375598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070188736,0.00014419468,0.00023479978,0.0004626973,0.00033979124,0.00028975419,0.00023695405,0.0001925667,0.00082100555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026909912,0.00019959663,0.00023098239,0.00039840766,0.0003844269,0.0005981823,0.0002981315,0.00019716377,0.00011977296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006269037,0.000030108242,0.99612206,0.0000102801805,0.00004066875,0.00005934947,0.00026832268,0.00011581119,0.00072465604,0.000025295838,0.00002128574,0.0025194648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010086568,0.00005293168,0.99940085,0.0000018070886,0.000009317192,0.00007478229,0.00012747492,0.00024234665,0.000041581035,0.000018367833,0.000027704384,0.0000017146183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013368268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04145258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013368268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032625717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000177095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02658093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149345448","doi":"10.1071/wr10239","title":"Effects of harvest and climate on population dynamics of northern bobwhites in south Florida","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ASTER","funders":"Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission","keywords":"Colinus; Population growth; Vital rates; Population; Population model; Population decline; Wildlife; Ecology; Leslie matrix; Biology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.031564128964204616,"score_gpt":0.28998558404624747,"score_spread":0.25842145508204284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149345448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998159,0.000012362128,0.000035952296,0.000011192787,2.864566e-7,9.428494e-7,0.000039748724,0.000001277449,0.000082525745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997689,0.000017774384,0.000068095585,0.000006650359,7.528635e-7,0.0000018926825,0.00007944563,4.3663454e-7,0.00005610061],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993527,0.00001728767,0.0000033142662,0.00001821578,0.000013153246,0.000012720752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997043,0.00006808943,0.0001255135,0.000013135343,0.000038006492,0.000050992734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031059718,0.00009949483,0.00009100906,0.00023514613,0.0001779656,0.00018611854,0.000115159135,0.0001404907,0.00054474676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006517271,0.00006305163,0.00012427523,0.00012258794,0.00017790163,0.00016374348,0.0002147079,0.00010881823,0.000050577142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014033572,0.000044115364,0.9848564,0.00001648337,0.00004360473,0.00008291067,0.00037234483,0.0018953093,0.007288156,0.000078387755,0.00014636021,0.0050356444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016725817,0.000047982005,0.9973671,0.0000024853844,0.000008159628,0.000024641047,0.0001763227,0.0020390162,0.0001726564,0.00002115728,0.00013592458,0.0000028901768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03276661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0817882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03276661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005583126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023429682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06515175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152242940","doi":"10.1071/wr13106","title":"Do measures of plant intake and digestibility from captive feeding trials align with foraging patterns of free-ranging snowshoe hares?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Pinus contorta; Herbivore; Foraging; Snowshoe hare; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Animal science; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.10927244422318813,"score_gpt":0.31397418184838594,"score_spread":0.2047017376251978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152242940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991359,0.00016215703,0.0003131796,0.000013686259,0.0000032694977,0.00000515983,0.00011852273,0.000004383345,0.00024379708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831176,0.00012794977,0.00090879184,0.00008790798,0.0000112713815,0.000019140636,0.00040475695,0.0000072900907,0.0001211068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994906,0.00016781103,0.000044078708,0.00017371695,0.000080566155,0.000043197793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756515,0.0005232188,0.0012116757,0.00025878297,0.0002241364,0.00021702115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011305263,0.0002502817,0.00042544855,0.00078476797,0.00037422206,0.00070064334,0.00042242795,0.00042365145,0.0007897677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002473529,0.0002467706,0.00020190043,0.00052258035,0.0007368244,0.00063877855,0.0003001235,0.00028868543,0.00015649333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001966569,0.00009068808,0.97326803,0.000066676825,0.00021930334,0.000056543005,0.00049376115,0.00009268919,0.020297248,0.000020233625,0.000107427855,0.005090778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.98599e-7,0.00008694658,0.9992995,0.0000028068544,0.000011364421,0.000044852826,0.000100576435,0.00006813733,0.00030898346,0.000012710216,0.00006110424,0.0000021091066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028260427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113606965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028260427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002152111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014184418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0059788227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160274947","doi":"10.1071/wr07017","title":"Nicarbazin bait reduces reproduction by pigeons (Columba livia)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Bird parasitology and diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Biology; Reproduction; Wildlife; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.09201050414584183,"score_gpt":0.36129298662460074,"score_spread":0.2692824824787589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160274947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99929667,0.0002515266,0.00005957201,0.000032117197,0.0000051950087,0.0000063185435,0.000021562017,0.0000092918735,0.00031771237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830127,0.0002047908,0.00030833465,0.000040814124,0.000005251461,0.000009296367,0.000084022424,0.000003305706,0.0010429003],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989843,0.000029764162,0.000006221474,0.000020470505,0.000019748455,0.000025285846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99987864,0.00001827002,0.00004813849,0.000009017445,0.000012294393,0.000033629163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010008806,0.00022519831,0.0001347903,0.00015464536,0.00016754791,0.00015967028,0.00016646442,0.00020665445,0.00075518753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019555906,0.00009618603,0.000097178214,0.000045427492,0.00020142626,0.00009853667,0.00012308398,0.00025244316,0.00009851055],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008469112,0.00029568913,0.009155682,0.00005222694,0.00001630768,0.00008375542,0.00006253155,0.00009302471,0.98297936,0.000029633322,0.00013029414,0.0062546856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016440665,0.022603665,0.40155932,0.00002391805,0.00007419071,0.00089732214,0.00028960637,0.0017325532,0.56948274,0.000060435123,0.0030941174,0.000017785236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047035106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014893919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047035106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003216907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014213663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009352267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163156469","doi":"10.1071/wr05039","title":"The propensity of spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus) to encounter and consume non-toxic meat baits in a simulated canid-control program","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Biology; Canis; Ecology; Zoology; Toxicology","score_opus":0.019818789121596878,"score_gpt":0.29705612055500036,"score_spread":0.27723733143340346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163156469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998801,0.000010279195,0.000019351786,0.0000047064145,8.1226494e-7,0.0000074375403,0.000016837175,0.000001251516,0.000059083504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990288,0.000026337457,0.00030685737,0.00003243414,0.0000024769242,0.000028696115,0.00013378708,9.751465e-7,0.00043954764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997923,0.00002884084,0.000015308404,0.000077568904,0.00003797081,0.000048101934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992774,0.000096442,0.00027162238,0.000042383705,0.000083108236,0.00022907279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033160727,0.00037078245,0.000283615,0.0004016719,0.0002712829,0.00030953743,0.00026535778,0.00041169755,0.0006817543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006957024,0.00017921123,0.00017741682,0.000113359056,0.0003020718,0.00029034266,0.00031235398,0.0003283084,0.0001678903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023898506,0.0019224987,0.6134169,0.00014202158,0.00010238058,0.00044988233,0.0011813644,0.00063025334,0.37078047,0.000079241196,0.00019361998,0.008711595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027606062,0.010364139,0.9694196,0.000008636593,0.00003637424,0.00031575633,0.0005416184,0.0018642216,0.017112063,0.000034825323,0.000259561,0.000015605252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046736836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014317294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046736836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041923448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021992862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00929296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163652456","doi":"10.1071/wr07166","title":"Registration of wildlife contraceptives in the United States of America, with OvoControl and GonaCon immunocontraceptive vaccines as examples","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Population; Environmental protection; Environmental health; Environmental planning; Business; Medicine; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.03590617864328853,"score_gpt":0.29816452782731306,"score_spread":0.2622583491840245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163652456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027510302,0.04332344,0.00798393,0.0121734785,0.009569253,0.0018067188,0.015543574,0.0019086065,0.8801808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18126547,0.06509828,0.02825755,0.012859752,0.0040727183,0.0012615148,0.024335776,0.0008224913,0.68202645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984187,0.00030735834,0.00013338393,0.00016347435,0.0008609229,0.00011616148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757034,0.0003767213,0.0005727315,0.00019731122,0.001026873,0.0002560488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014357535,0.0003787565,0.0002881506,0.000980413,0.0009008805,0.0010320698,0.00046577147,0.001119957,0.048488047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027849295,0.0001826311,0.00039869017,0.001080571,0.00048789597,0.00090134965,0.00041101876,0.0011654756,0.012817605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036069905,0.00027925757,0.0048906705,0.0011209792,0.000026438009,0.0005092239,0.0003250605,0.00014398304,0.013674213,0.013251159,0.44742563,0.5179927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001591287,0.0001895016,0.001686714,0.00009804538,0.000008707659,0.00038010994,0.00005346101,0.000045176268,0.0018542975,0.00021792579,0.9954419,0.000008175042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044796043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008833617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048488047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006459558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002174692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16220868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166764309","doi":"10.1071/wr06127","title":"Microhabitat use by the brush-tailed bettong (Bettongia penicillata) and burrowing bettong (B. lesueur) in semiarid New South Wales: implications for reintroduction programs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Endangered species; Vegetation (pathology); Geography","score_opus":0.07113928115424996,"score_gpt":0.3319595755010773,"score_spread":0.26082029434682735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166764309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997693,0.0000438764,0.000042305157,0.000010997014,4.4657844e-7,0.0000025165202,0.000018727435,0.0000012424327,0.00011056508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946886,0.00006713488,0.00018152317,0.000015198732,4.958649e-7,0.0000057274774,0.00006496203,9.95725e-7,0.0001951743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998485,0.000052733292,0.000007232461,0.000042865606,0.000015419833,0.000033257616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997009,0.000089422385,0.00010115254,0.000014290821,0.000032110835,0.00006221697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041537575,0.00025307768,0.0002328595,0.0005474738,0.00025943268,0.0005100612,0.00030623664,0.00024732976,0.0006484264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066985365,0.00019524028,0.00020431259,0.00027878428,0.00044849448,0.0003793475,0.0004935516,0.00021924087,0.000120205004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000973509,0.000054274544,0.98519695,0.000038603233,0.000052005664,0.00018371227,0.0008537041,0.0014035264,0.006187257,0.000041388532,0.00006638958,0.0058249114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017865681,0.000041046027,0.9979481,0.000006569587,0.0000063308175,0.000042608437,0.00049005705,0.0013059455,0.00007848978,0.000014183489,0.000061394836,0.000003574743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096131526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33483532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096131526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008488767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031063776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19114399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168981465","doi":"10.1071/wr06161","title":"Predicting the occurrence of the quokka, Setonix brachyurus (Macropodidae : Marsupialia), in Western Australia’s northern jarrah forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Swamp; Biology; Ecology; Akaike information criterion; Geography; Forestry; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06254575811532997,"score_gpt":0.3469319008012395,"score_spread":0.2843861426859095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168981465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99962044,0.000028737135,0.00017841312,0.0000276877,7.785666e-7,0.0000033431759,0.0000564981,0.000004143583,0.00008000295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990101,0.000027794651,0.0006647958,0.0000082056995,0.0000013953421,0.000004506926,0.00017379463,0.0000012260722,0.00010812509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994868,0.00021152997,0.000040430463,0.00013096097,0.000050371254,0.00007985026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977011,0.0011944898,0.0005692321,0.0000896622,0.00018366564,0.0002619078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015964806,0.00050711085,0.00032584596,0.0008131194,0.0004396625,0.0009797021,0.00067160703,0.0007661913,0.0006561286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004267872,0.00038497188,0.00054311025,0.00050570833,0.0004576687,0.00076133665,0.0009190903,0.000500097,0.00017549288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008779897,0.000089680456,0.98401505,0.000029787834,0.00007406394,0.00010082602,0.00032123743,0.010591316,0.00064282236,0.000054752225,0.000117719945,0.0038749035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012782939,0.00015351902,0.88393027,0.000018905746,0.000047923433,0.000091154034,0.0010399823,0.11415799,0.00020658576,0.00014850596,0.0001767443,0.000015511141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10011429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18678287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10011429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011570355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076621724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19906312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171132825","doi":"10.1071/wr11152","title":"Effect of paved road density on abundance of white-tailed deer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Wildlife; Predation; Relative species abundance; Odocoileus; Context (archaeology); Population density; Biology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.03285229719229934,"score_gpt":0.3504429063610417,"score_spread":0.3175906091687424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171132825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983973,0.00022191342,0.0003037171,0.000029085119,0.000008776888,0.000006688314,0.00043790665,0.000010170489,0.00058437046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99920875,0.000090778245,0.00023530642,0.000012550338,0.000007217136,0.0000060579373,0.00028154408,0.0000023620103,0.00015545479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994709,0.00016624779,0.000038690592,0.0001795287,0.00007957319,0.00006506701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734026,0.0010331402,0.00088278286,0.00015524284,0.0003347028,0.00025385767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004992663,0.00016984358,0.00016187623,0.0004323332,0.0002729084,0.0005467403,0.0003168689,0.00022728098,0.0017848441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00310357,0.00014853437,0.00024243176,0.000412135,0.00032253456,0.00037865198,0.00030252716,0.00024434368,0.00021560707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013125381,0.000039953105,0.9932904,0.000043959568,0.0001384616,0.000085147185,0.00009051586,0.00044257118,0.0009850331,0.000049653783,0.00020283728,0.0045002303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021105704,0.00010947794,0.9983038,0.00001219502,0.000048841153,0.00010668153,0.00014569904,0.0005355855,0.00027053346,0.000046342444,0.00041438322,0.000004491961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076918835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022760317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076918835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002871956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020610976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015294254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171633698","doi":"10.1071/wr12039","title":"Revealing a cryptic life-history stage: differences in habitat selection and survivorship between hatchlings of two turtle species at risk (Glyptemys insculpta and Emydoidea blandingii)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Hatchling; Ecology; Biology; Overwintering; Habitat; Survivorship curve; Painted turtle; Turtle (robot); Predation; Population; Context (archaeology); Demography","score_opus":0.1138460940594011,"score_gpt":0.31024992180302097,"score_spread":0.19640382774361986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171633698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99966645,0.000042040003,0.000024475548,0.0000067621672,7.5091566e-7,0.0000015107037,0.000092077236,0.0000011047276,0.00016494494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996356,0.000014927593,0.0000402657,0.0000054398674,5.781391e-7,0.0000017421484,0.00013491351,3.343295e-7,0.00016625298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999405,0.000006586841,0.0000037805828,0.000021405187,0.000008701127,0.000018943338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997397,0.000020396445,0.00013548022,0.000012287293,0.000030125511,0.00006196108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001266567,0.0001663727,0.00009272286,0.0003683183,0.00024066973,0.00022948941,0.00019000053,0.0001496809,0.001307812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028296272,0.00008468222,0.00015108053,0.00015670448,0.00025007993,0.00017265535,0.00024080077,0.00014893105,0.0001314479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046154768,0.00001366017,0.99269193,0.000010704856,0.000014285514,0.000051260413,0.00025663374,0.00002846074,0.0054118065,0.000008848313,0.00005629146,0.0014099706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.142439e-7,0.000009829974,0.99984264,5.40395e-7,0.000001002423,0.00001586652,0.000061261766,0.000010488221,0.000038798004,0.000001085152,0.000017909919,2.717186e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031428993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16559312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031428993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043804082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020772181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062492132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256035393","doi":"10.1071/wr15029","title":"Precision, accuracy and bias of walked line-transect distance sampling to estimate eastern grey kangaroo population size","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Victoria","keywords":"Transect; Distance sampling; Sampling (signal processing); Abundance (ecology); Population; Aerial survey; Ecology; Geography; Abundance estimation; Statistics; Physical geography; Biology; Cartography; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.1466763176429301,"score_gpt":0.4026041708538008,"score_spread":0.2559278532108707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256035393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96573955,0.0013501853,0.029525597,0.0000657282,0.00004643245,0.00010893468,0.0009391616,0.00014690027,0.0020775208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828845,0.00018847376,0.015585808,0.000054977296,0.000023414736,0.00010047333,0.00073120376,0.0000326242,0.00039836628],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855906,0.0065480424,0.0017627019,0.0029536881,0.0028736198,0.00027136106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565881,0.018145166,0.012452995,0.005308527,0.0070267357,0.00047848944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015271552,0.00041942854,0.0005100172,0.0015158065,0.00043464746,0.0009637851,0.0010389745,0.0004888808,0.0005032775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043476913,0.00035069845,0.00054395705,0.0012430933,0.0006547125,0.00096551614,0.0011459193,0.0003597039,0.00037167888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024285103,0.000025156449,0.96862775,0.0001259808,0.00046811657,0.00004906846,0.0012478074,0.0020584443,0.003676487,0.00011170173,0.00033702256,0.023029577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018942286,0.00024308916,0.9843925,0.00009192397,0.00020908185,0.000384148,0.00052361714,0.009498298,0.0030738257,0.00029565516,0.0012253023,0.000043532928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052639176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01475453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015271552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043663356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025908364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08076471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2367479234","doi":"10.1071/wr15040","title":"Assessment of non-target risks from sodium fluoroacetate (1080), para-aminopropiophenone (PAPP) and sodium cyanide (NaCN) for fox-incursion response in Tasmania","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Richmond Hospital","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Vulpes; Biology; Context (archaeology); Introduced species; Zoology; Canis; Rodenticide; Wildlife; Sodium cyanide; Ecology; Invasive species; Toxicology; Predation; Chemistry; Cyanide","score_opus":0.08919697995665447,"score_gpt":0.3993512601862775,"score_spread":0.310154280229623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2367479234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984085,0.00028928556,0.00030877686,0.000044261866,0.0000025780873,0.000030771458,0.0000942612,0.0000058174164,0.00081575924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976947,0.00035946778,0.0010269717,0.00006049165,0.0000022388454,0.00001802003,0.00011419581,0.0000014318092,0.00072238606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997831,0.000049133825,0.000016034604,0.000044626664,0.00007323446,0.00003387514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995741,0.000043230335,0.00021190141,0.000010120102,0.00010838513,0.00005222985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005816444,0.0002888173,0.00016970921,0.00034286498,0.00028686255,0.0003027932,0.00029845088,0.000308898,0.0009639651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045338427,0.00012222563,0.00025281435,0.00016392609,0.0002842124,0.00022469729,0.0002212134,0.00021196135,0.000097765835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085385545,0.00035272836,0.87463915,0.000453921,0.00020460779,0.0008665899,0.0013616122,0.0014881353,0.093525596,0.00024105654,0.00036475906,0.025648003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011826755,0.0057374067,0.97259074,0.000049872433,0.00017994437,0.00087445043,0.001398123,0.0021415828,0.015369031,0.00010269107,0.0015300654,0.000014165778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03590783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08315252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03590783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013658408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009124002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07139766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464710418","doi":"10.1071/wr16045","title":"Dietary overlap and co-existence of sympatric wild yak, Tibetan wild ass and Tibetan antelope in Arjin Shan National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang Province, China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Biology; Forb; Sympatric speciation; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Forage; Transect; Geography; Ecology; Grassland; Habitat","score_opus":0.03206548564909218,"score_gpt":0.3234142999092241,"score_spread":0.2913488142601319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464710418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997062,0.000053334534,0.000023361923,0.000006657036,8.958512e-7,0.0000022295894,0.00007303229,7.0204e-7,0.00013341743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995203,0.000035456662,0.000115633855,0.000011427506,0.0000020616183,0.000006975988,0.00016635498,6.627204e-7,0.00014111915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997923,0.00002983722,0.000020924428,0.000087704335,0.000030235491,0.000038939423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997105,0.000031091025,0.00013470942,0.000015774149,0.000026911714,0.00008100256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002844599,0.00025009757,0.00023844735,0.0010001137,0.0008293142,0.0003495772,0.00035416867,0.0002173968,0.0013048559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023489134,0.00018917659,0.00015345759,0.0011006681,0.0006760107,0.00028206632,0.0003300023,0.00017165925,0.000087140776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006467423,0.000024261511,0.9948008,0.000028441478,0.00005084851,0.00017130813,0.00094962114,0.00004430191,0.0019130579,0.000029032575,0.000061017516,0.0018625743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013176877,0.000014764702,0.99916387,0.0000032874204,0.000006814864,0.000058162434,0.00058530126,0.0000631328,0.00002422357,0.0000091840375,0.00006797504,0.0000019112313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031180603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13423061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031180603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006643789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039505513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06199819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524143546","doi":"10.1071/wr16047","title":"Nesting ecology of hawksbill turtles at a rookery of international significance in Australia’s Northern Territory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Rookery; Carpentaria; Geography; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Critically endangered; Nesting season; Population; Seasonality; Habitat; Fishery; Sea turtle; Turtle (robot); Endangered species; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07058751550257218,"score_gpt":0.3384312605166885,"score_spread":0.2678437450141163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524143546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996735,0.000030857143,0.000019001962,0.000005466629,5.3331314e-7,0.0000025751406,0.00002763393,0.0000010700052,0.000239552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967074,0.00002740145,0.00008177082,0.0000069193497,0.000001066577,0.0000038795824,0.000049314847,5.188622e-7,0.00015842952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999099,0.000016517282,0.000006950372,0.00002927277,0.000015575677,0.000021847065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970055,0.000023430175,0.00011238872,0.000011982323,0.00004448815,0.00010726662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001903861,0.0001397637,0.00011749403,0.0005421677,0.00039325265,0.00031588983,0.00014743852,0.00013893389,0.00068650406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033808837,0.00010930838,0.00013702706,0.00025351482,0.00042595444,0.00025282663,0.0003838511,0.0001220926,0.00012118671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035378573,0.00003210638,0.98982006,0.000015170406,0.000022706075,0.00020015705,0.0019693424,0.0000769262,0.0043682125,0.000022178969,0.000096853706,0.0033409176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.1744196e-7,0.000025522191,0.99941266,0.0000020515706,0.0000025152724,0.00007262148,0.0003603683,0.000039449704,0.000029717574,0.000003210021,0.00005079621,8.180329e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034341346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13672954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034341346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005037788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024755602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0682829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594832554","doi":"10.1071/wr14239","title":"Middle of the road: enhanced habitat for salamanders on unused logging roads","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Salamander; Ecology; Logging; Context (archaeology); Snag; Coarse woody debris; Habitat fragmentation; Population; Fragmentation (computing); Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.11910882867045597,"score_gpt":0.3684508742250608,"score_spread":0.24934204555460482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594832554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993926,0.000025800073,0.00007409818,0.000011016778,0.0000012088532,0.0000049213263,0.000031312313,0.000003758909,0.0004552227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994148,0.000023403114,0.00032340418,0.000019040866,0.000002899676,0.0000045786537,0.000045051573,0.0000016941426,0.00016518531],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998128,0.000043751075,0.0000100789875,0.000041898733,0.000033174638,0.000058309764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994436,0.000092230526,0.00024662592,0.000043189135,0.00006382082,0.000110499444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029650473,0.00012600931,0.00013362347,0.0004183933,0.00031964912,0.0005324797,0.0003397407,0.00019686828,0.00200905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006247045,0.000098660596,0.00018896836,0.00020506575,0.00048324937,0.00037590953,0.0005150877,0.00019824487,0.00013681268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019790149,0.00019786584,0.9321731,0.000103080034,0.00004320899,0.0004919798,0.001076154,0.00036571632,0.044417653,0.0001271602,0.00027057694,0.020535704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023520604,0.00020450828,0.9974081,0.000009937671,0.000011107141,0.00020060745,0.00066900084,0.00021092201,0.00077448384,0.00004452184,0.0004606266,0.0000038300127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005908307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039268203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005908307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034298564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022267501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011747837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596638026","doi":"10.1071/wr16130","title":"Mitigation reduces road mortality of a threatened rattlesnake","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Queen's University; Laurentian University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Fencing; Threatened species; Context (archaeology); Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Habitat; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.13073311559582315,"score_gpt":0.4193402297351664,"score_spread":0.28860711413934326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596638026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991685,0.000074120995,0.000237253,0.000020155314,0.0000022639442,0.000010127203,0.000026912698,0.000011748286,0.00044891902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854386,0.000094353396,0.0009622551,0.000022535545,0.0000039137017,0.000014809125,0.00009473164,0.0000016933557,0.00026181375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982774,0.00004729418,0.000011626536,0.000040439318,0.000039754235,0.000032978423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935514,0.00007301361,0.00027630993,0.000048803613,0.00012812723,0.00011861207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032958697,0.00027571147,0.00015766491,0.000330171,0.00031950074,0.00030035223,0.0002790837,0.00018229481,0.00072547054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071279844,0.00006791549,0.00020305722,0.00011769049,0.0003260498,0.00026000766,0.0003633744,0.00022510428,0.00015544606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004866997,0.00052304467,0.81985193,0.00029135958,0.00018869244,0.00046633696,0.00077400357,0.0032468159,0.11597846,0.00017930551,0.00060586527,0.057407472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006051029,0.0020849905,0.98903555,0.000023175178,0.000054964643,0.0002447321,0.00053985236,0.0009675646,0.006046186,0.000061730854,0.0009255774,0.00000962785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063848104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03614975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063848104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037680898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038546763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0126953125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596797771","doi":"10.1071/wr16178","title":"Falling apart? Insights and lessons from three recent studies documenting rapid and severe decline in terrestrial mammal assemblages of northern, south-eastern and south-western Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Deakin University","keywords":"Mammal; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Geography; Fauna; National park; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Wildlife; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.17535605316722128,"score_gpt":0.39238961050522714,"score_spread":0.21703355733800586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596797771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987773,0.0047372193,0.00038433113,0.003822228,0.00006540608,0.000024217888,0.00017375576,0.000005230448,0.0030145575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916984,0.004295381,0.0008508573,0.001714964,0.00012799438,0.000037075573,0.0002466199,0.000010129907,0.0010185308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899966,0.00034934407,0.00014089064,0.00020666611,0.00013812934,0.00016534518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994103,0.0014624397,0.0016878205,0.0003617844,0.0017720304,0.00061299914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004628481,0.0002934576,0.0003792157,0.0015136992,0.0014358487,0.0017605176,0.0009615308,0.000851134,0.00087883876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070644272,0.00029670153,0.00032138568,0.0016104408,0.002011014,0.0018933375,0.0018528397,0.0010610537,0.00017969239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015579908,0.00013717198,0.765894,0.0009327356,0.00021726363,0.0027704865,0.16600378,0.000119119024,0.0026244603,0.0010971907,0.0027068194,0.057341147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002821238,0.000076618846,0.9466473,0.0003410584,0.00007064944,0.00065749855,0.04437821,0.00011783113,0.00027113035,0.0003594654,0.0070603336,0.000017162298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07381814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19123049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07381814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017503318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016357197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14677697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2661800170","doi":"10.1071/wr16194","title":"Identifying peaks in bat activity: a new application of SaTScan’s space–time scan statistic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scan statistic; Foraging; Myotis lucifugus; Human echolocation; Biology; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12044538687423202,"score_gpt":0.3799283796281717,"score_spread":0.2594829927539397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2661800170","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09212639,0.00042892908,0.9000693,0.000256398,0.00014184376,0.00011995034,0.0013855327,0.00301639,0.0024552185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55784595,0.00029666407,0.43813688,0.0001710652,0.00025101472,0.0002732887,0.0016404565,0.0005118239,0.0008728424],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792373,0.0009625365,0.00016985551,0.0003464847,0.0005186418,0.00007872062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98361236,0.012107969,0.0015728934,0.00094379095,0.0014496039,0.0003133509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029217075,0.00063743873,0.0008189033,0.003291934,0.00033708807,0.0010588851,0.00079295906,0.00059053086,0.0017094152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017090907,0.0002965429,0.0008007865,0.0031947845,0.0007517726,0.0011390788,0.0010492122,0.0009045195,0.0004554993],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019873083,0.00028455327,0.19561777,0.000647346,0.00081206614,0.0010470172,0.0013477022,0.1324556,0.038943198,0.025855692,0.012690679,0.588311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109695415,0.0007117567,0.06365217,0.00007683102,0.00020904865,0.0013151864,0.00055831275,0.8891613,0.013860998,0.017199827,0.012977997,0.00016687423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025038645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024780286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003291934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000491466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069636933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01545161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766857865","doi":"10.1071/wr17063","title":"Temporal variation in the population characteristics of harvested wolverine (Gulo gulo) in northwestern Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Yukon Department of Environment; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Population; Biology; Demography; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.04051850472688492,"score_gpt":0.30542588255058317,"score_spread":0.2649073778236983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766857865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99801946,0.0001831267,0.000098361146,0.000037395752,0.0000024845588,0.0000056854437,0.0010286702,0.0000052653268,0.0006194393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976441,0.0001806579,0.0002077453,0.000031122097,0.0000015932561,0.000008824582,0.0012396446,0.0000032261976,0.00068317493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998047,0.00001142642,0.000009878571,0.000057977813,0.000049786282,0.00006628609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993411,0.00003786579,0.00014107312,0.0000239845,0.00029774263,0.00015829016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025204706,0.00012560036,0.00014573717,0.00066648313,0.0007593185,0.00054043095,0.00042433068,0.0001607963,0.0007946801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055169145,0.00010891219,0.00013369368,0.0010690184,0.00040030398,0.00015850966,0.00029291085,0.00023095813,0.00009623226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002559449,0.0000069979656,0.9942964,0.000011503778,0.000032763026,0.000064684355,0.0008019452,0.00009672913,0.0007528647,0.000054573626,0.0005030325,0.003352893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.0198737e-7,0.0000024746025,0.9991171,0.000004627926,0.0000028488396,0.000015199296,0.00052560907,0.000047600854,0.000022303539,0.0000035439775,0.00025694497,0.0000015151558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9437962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98782545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056203783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005297858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033270828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113069475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788447539","doi":"10.1071/wr17065","title":"Green-tree retention and recovery of an old-forest specialist, the southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi), 20 years after harvest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Clearcutting; Basal area; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Species richness; Context (archaeology); Biodiversity; Old-growth forest; Snag; Species diversity; Habitat; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.03038950147195481,"score_gpt":0.29153517047051647,"score_spread":0.2611456689985617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788447539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999856,0.000016297668,0.000007915981,0.0000027859799,3.9664357e-7,5.588825e-7,0.000039664286,6.411177e-7,0.00007577757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959487,0.000015770638,0.000017879032,0.0000062767895,5.8638966e-7,0.0000012540942,0.00012144821,3.0072152e-7,0.00024161176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999521,0.000005031875,0.0000022121098,0.000015843052,0.000008708931,0.000016082891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981946,0.000008918101,0.00007490743,0.000010418683,0.000023837007,0.000062492785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001490764,0.00012798756,0.00008188488,0.00020975104,0.00024561994,0.00023726466,0.00017227202,0.000117819836,0.00059887936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028124783,0.00008177236,0.00008102008,0.00010710111,0.00020143641,0.00014744287,0.00016983159,0.00013758836,0.00012508297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114617185,0.00007607299,0.9910149,0.000007187161,0.000023817356,0.00013837514,0.0003346964,0.00007596207,0.0053457385,0.0000135993,0.00013785249,0.0027172104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.289609e-7,0.000021541235,0.99971026,8.8445233e-7,0.000002327452,0.00003094619,0.000093633615,0.000033346223,0.00006716718,0.0000027745552,0.000035987123,4.6587496e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039687876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1779099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039687876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045884313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019113674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07891375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794559218","doi":"10.1071/wr16218","title":"Establishing baseline estimates of blue sheep (Pseudois nayaur) abundance and density to sustain populations of the vulnerable snow leopard (Panthera uncia) in Western Bhutan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"Royal Government of Bhutan; Royal Society; Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Snow leopard; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Threatened species; National park; Context (archaeology); Population; Transect; Population density; Predation; Ecology; Distance sampling; Mark and recapture; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.05351753503130784,"score_gpt":0.3375887755710125,"score_spread":0.2840712405397047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794559218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99873346,0.00006695108,0.00031301673,0.000017628723,0.0000022986828,0.000026518264,0.00028427746,0.0000072154103,0.00054859865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972377,0.000081282546,0.0015700153,0.00001878402,0.000004194744,0.00007916789,0.00069997704,0.0000021869857,0.00030670592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998053,0.000044183253,0.00002197684,0.000048761936,0.000037119906,0.000042794236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996228,0.000049664755,0.0001375988,0.000026911765,0.00008363829,0.000079234575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033982086,0.00016208708,0.00015570981,0.0008834023,0.0004531905,0.00026653658,0.00038523326,0.00017311625,0.00088580826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007111284,0.0001684811,0.00011597882,0.000534554,0.00025263266,0.0004562311,0.00054122845,0.00019300326,0.00019785453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040612584,0.00003497653,0.9838306,0.00004955599,0.000013961988,0.00019772665,0.00191521,0.00018111276,0.0038583353,0.000040573406,0.00023958193,0.009597724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001328631,0.000050683382,0.998485,0.000009422245,0.0000031579023,0.00007645391,0.0007836334,0.0002183245,0.0000987804,0.000019851022,0.00025114525,0.0000021229985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02334292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092120916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02334292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048700848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046496745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046414077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806569854","doi":"10.1071/wr17106","title":"Northward bound: the distribution of white-tailed deer in Ontario under a changing climate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Climate change; Geography; Occupancy; Snow; Context (archaeology); Physical geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Species distribution; Habitat; Biology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.07452820469779643,"score_gpt":0.3259663112367001,"score_spread":0.2514381065389037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806569854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979578,0.00004251756,0.00029051182,0.00005836605,0.0000016461103,0.000007856576,0.00059643167,0.000006613125,0.0010381996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834824,0.00005796285,0.0002873607,0.000011395486,0.0000012729075,0.0000050354606,0.00040738677,0.0000026813152,0.00087857095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998578,0.000012546017,0.0000055427754,0.00004632627,0.000037659614,0.00004001584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996259,0.000052490625,0.00008646115,0.000020320253,0.00013343344,0.00008125272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018226543,0.000115237024,0.00014250548,0.00040558574,0.00075695675,0.0005803074,0.00048466955,0.00017993018,0.0011809162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008653912,0.00013453979,0.0003048934,0.00061916263,0.00042943438,0.00035789458,0.0005377305,0.00017539035,0.00015811506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052997042,0.000014672282,0.9906764,0.000020470703,0.000027920822,0.00011884646,0.0013774124,0.0021394587,0.0011408753,0.00020966736,0.0003534183,0.0038678073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032551764,0.000019153149,0.98792505,0.000015110493,0.000015240687,0.00006460749,0.0018202519,0.008210447,0.00019169127,0.00013145946,0.0015920686,0.0000117207865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92409253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9747328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07590747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007136015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003959172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15270895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809617688","doi":"10.1071/wr17056","title":"Understanding conflict and consensus regarding wood bison management in Alaska, USA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Alaska Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Geography; Context (archaeology); Wildlife management; Bison bison; Socioeconomics; Wildlife; Forest management; Ecology; Forestry; Archaeology; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.19475196436163275,"score_gpt":0.3576345916814197,"score_spread":0.16288262731978695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809617688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99622774,0.00015275698,0.00013138783,0.00044245817,0.0000066725265,0.0000044008802,0.0000125411625,0.000001185974,0.003020932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993759,0.00017376129,0.00010138306,0.000092884155,0.0000025448278,0.0000069574808,0.000016800735,8.7394574e-7,0.00022901846],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985625,0.0009200385,0.00007632731,0.0001377074,0.00016973859,0.00013365719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660975,0.0016044539,0.0008261415,0.00008611638,0.00038322285,0.000490228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030577644,0.00013727896,0.00014198072,0.00078061887,0.0033353535,0.0018974545,0.00046120695,0.00047141316,0.00228095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060563018,0.00018204763,0.00009799936,0.0005819161,0.0019729685,0.0014106473,0.002018088,0.00076852436,0.0000993368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114754126,0.00016767667,0.28296974,0.00014817737,0.000046386976,0.00063165,0.68359137,0.0003020844,0.000826095,0.0024153492,0.0014337518,0.027352974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003897205,0.00005675385,0.11594284,0.00017373684,0.000015138004,0.00010878427,0.87639517,0.00036787384,0.0001036629,0.0012283565,0.005586701,0.000017111419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058049463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12968725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058049463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019969065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002176643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11542314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884005247","doi":"10.1071/wr17155","title":"The use of point-of-view cameras (Kittycams) to quantify predation by colony cats (Felis catus) on wildlife","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals","keywords":"Predation; Wildlife; Felis catus; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Camera trap; Invertebrate; Apex predator; Fishery; Geography","score_opus":0.10882383412946302,"score_gpt":0.36042717971081983,"score_spread":0.25160334558135683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884005247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98559546,0.0010062193,0.006909355,0.0000960072,0.000024839173,0.00022019126,0.0022944042,0.00010939905,0.0037441833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781884,0.0005104973,0.018675568,0.0001256143,0.000019245032,0.00018924824,0.0012887504,0.000011671566,0.0009910548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937385,0.00015060043,0.000049109214,0.00020186823,0.00018117472,0.000043387285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973794,0.00049626286,0.0013209517,0.00011162599,0.0005536023,0.00013818585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008631491,0.00044114632,0.00023937969,0.0017904778,0.00025000292,0.0006412691,0.0005209245,0.0004780495,0.0016992966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002141223,0.00031028021,0.00030497508,0.0006732069,0.00025051783,0.0008909812,0.0006067459,0.00026674222,0.00034402456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011602766,0.00011813796,0.93694174,0.0004872338,0.00024086927,0.000121947574,0.00041049006,0.00084216165,0.014873553,0.00013084438,0.0015394294,0.044177573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072931807,0.00017029895,0.9924684,0.00007522133,0.00006803794,0.00044636164,0.00031964935,0.0034967014,0.002103088,0.000069006644,0.0007618021,0.000014006266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061632292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02382225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061632292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036887033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029762427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012254715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888945442","doi":"10.1071/wr18006","title":"Evaluating wildlife management by using principles of applied ecology: case studies and implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Canberra","keywords":"Wildlife management; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biodiversity; Landscape ecology; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Geography; Environmental planning; Biology; Habitat; Environmental science","score_opus":0.20579479417875648,"score_gpt":0.44022775682864607,"score_spread":0.23443296264988958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888945442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7559808,0.015689753,0.111243606,0.014769312,0.00020465469,0.0067414236,0.00023381218,0.00009602104,0.09504056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9078038,0.0064568496,0.0820723,0.0008288526,0.00003868647,0.0019364695,0.000045191042,0.000019644129,0.0007983801],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8859317,0.09970738,0.0030282969,0.0012428698,0.008409741,0.0016800911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8548943,0.1281722,0.006180174,0.0039366875,0.005950993,0.00086566986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07386899,0.0010639603,0.00094948075,0.003974578,0.0028301682,0.0063400296,0.0032040577,0.0028678633,0.0014990153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06020347,0.00042790876,0.0007221572,0.0068093534,0.008562462,0.004855583,0.0043351725,0.0022398736,0.00013529496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005506871,0.008217846,0.09061304,0.009454516,0.00041830388,0.0051361076,0.061725993,0.06312973,0.0022377195,0.22756758,0.0059619276,0.52498657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093924074,0.011991949,0.102580704,0.027955035,0.0008743105,0.0041246666,0.29858723,0.100360624,0.013755146,0.31214684,0.12617092,0.0005134153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050882953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012070013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07386899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010119305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007782138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39066124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895666811","doi":"10.1071/wr17185","title":"First assessment of the potential introduction by hunters of eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) in Spain","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Wildlife management; European rabbit; Ecology; Introduced species; Biology; Population; Wildlife; Invasive species; Geography; Wildlife conservation; Zoology; Archaeology; Demography","score_opus":0.019211505070781138,"score_gpt":0.2966174799609183,"score_spread":0.2774059748901372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895666811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99908507,0.00014963237,0.00009389741,0.000014235702,0.0000019697693,0.000006729095,0.00009618244,0.0000023253046,0.00054992735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991289,0.0001604057,0.0002120714,0.00001901749,0.0000043773734,0.000009217734,0.0001881983,9.563976e-7,0.00027684553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997471,0.0000719536,0.000028971746,0.00007313439,0.000036896145,0.000041939555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828374,0.00042587396,0.00071403163,0.00013471578,0.00028055714,0.00016101058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008715467,0.00023093831,0.00019839256,0.0007210541,0.00022464094,0.00055343343,0.00021964301,0.00035654465,0.0008138019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014785898,0.00013247885,0.00019876176,0.00042629038,0.00031759447,0.00023294834,0.00042268052,0.00016308032,0.00016048734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078924095,0.000016940712,0.9953317,0.000020959505,0.000014502573,0.00009788206,0.00063176773,0.000041613246,0.00062688,0.00001273938,0.00005327666,0.0030727286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026179828,0.000076261575,0.9987097,0.000010049478,0.0000066073867,0.00009525881,0.0007449427,0.00006978955,0.000052607917,0.000009720727,0.00022095785,0.0000015166714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014582962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03028753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014582962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047284272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026438074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02899617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901306901","doi":"10.1071/wr18008","title":"Degrees of population-level susceptibility of Australian terrestrial non-volant mammal species to predation by the introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cat (Felis catus)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Vulpes; Biology; Mammal; Threatened species; Predation; Predator; Ecology; Population; Fauna; Felis; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.07450685067210476,"score_gpt":0.33082071723849366,"score_spread":0.2563138665663889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901306901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992637,0.00007203255,0.00003246684,0.000015347076,7.376747e-7,0.000002289362,0.00005049736,0.0000010160184,0.0005619705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978966,0.000034138804,0.00003069838,0.0000043378577,0.0000010337862,0.000001352751,0.000057218538,2.1093412e-7,0.00008130657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962604,0.000075957796,0.000047887344,0.0000931004,0.00010011666,0.000056911464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877495,0.00015153234,0.0006640036,0.000069356116,0.00019413247,0.00014611673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054195244,0.000096915304,0.00013854614,0.0010454297,0.00031356592,0.00034929556,0.0003393141,0.0001818365,0.0013452056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019122316,0.00011314813,0.00017455981,0.0004570263,0.00069524697,0.00027234954,0.00062510086,0.00018977332,0.00017124451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041308394,0.000008756758,0.99329776,0.000030379528,0.000052761436,0.00011522882,0.0014081434,0.000091741735,0.0022134876,0.00007138969,0.000066300156,0.002602781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.6520448e-7,0.000011818947,0.99938846,0.0000022897157,0.0000042026527,0.0000767334,0.0003466946,0.00004512197,0.000047073023,0.00001793271,0.000058084697,0.0000011941245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010689909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025454873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010689909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004351041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016406621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021255374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902467597","doi":"10.1071/wr18091","title":"Forecasting the spatiotemporal pattern of the cane toad invasion into north-western Australia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hatch (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Colonisation; Geography; Habitat; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.14131063510816222,"score_gpt":0.35160683444100743,"score_spread":0.2102961993328452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902467597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99668366,0.00006906379,0.0015156277,0.00022219522,0.000006457705,0.000021229926,0.00028678612,0.000021077292,0.0011739563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979837,0.00007792758,0.001355292,0.000016614667,0.0000021717512,0.000009650844,0.00020935525,0.000003089585,0.00034217857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999032,0.000022303959,0.000006915799,0.000034702025,0.000014624196,0.00001826249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948597,0.00010721506,0.00014190514,0.00003649225,0.00011703262,0.000111398025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045705098,0.00025909624,0.00016892636,0.00052063365,0.0003268646,0.00069221074,0.0005207634,0.00045441272,0.00092679664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002114381,0.00017136979,0.0003570644,0.00036900045,0.0003185761,0.0006931307,0.000532016,0.00040072564,0.00015611702],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011396526,0.00012156056,0.72046447,0.00010147306,0.0001308767,0.00036537566,0.0009650556,0.257832,0.003122486,0.0015958451,0.0015460197,0.013640897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008592575,0.000064333784,0.29376787,0.00003556358,0.000038199076,0.000065017375,0.00096231553,0.7022176,0.0003596315,0.00075670937,0.0017008197,0.000023397013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22075553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23118421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22075553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00168609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000844817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43894118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909592627","doi":"10.1071/wr18072","title":"The influence of food availability, quality and body size on patch selection of coexisting grazer ungulates in western Serengeti National Park","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute; Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildebeest; Biology; Ecology; Transect; Range (aeronautics); Niche; Context (archaeology); Biomass (ecology); Habitat; National park","score_opus":0.0543252004234107,"score_gpt":0.3523327623668232,"score_spread":0.2980075619434125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909592627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998604,0.000023534123,0.000007767475,0.000002968466,5.179707e-7,5.472954e-7,0.000020148278,2.715799e-7,0.000083954284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99984,0.00002326812,0.00003159787,0.0000049914242,0.0000012049782,0.0000015348394,0.00004327806,3.103382e-7,0.000053716525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999145,0.000025856862,0.000005677009,0.00002225859,0.000008796187,0.000022814986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971694,0.00006599915,0.000112977425,0.000013650837,0.000018418063,0.000071966315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023722259,0.00012093136,0.00012371385,0.0003568376,0.00027759073,0.00030018532,0.0001494594,0.000119282406,0.0009017221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004561915,0.000104235696,0.00011172561,0.00021637068,0.00033081186,0.00019730294,0.00024796184,0.0001474956,0.000074865646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009150849,0.000022934137,0.9972441,0.000008584363,0.000016955044,0.00007626763,0.00029731062,0.000035041227,0.000962729,0.000008613912,0.000030590818,0.0012053857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.2413386e-7,0.000024284069,0.99963534,0.0000013031223,0.0000028157992,0.000031716438,0.00023029912,0.00003115529,0.000016982834,0.0000026861035,0.00002241388,4.1285708e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010326768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04111634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010326768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021132486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012014839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020533323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914058545","doi":"10.1071/wr18035","title":"Retaining change in attitudes and emotions toward coyotes using experiential education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Experiential learning; Context (archaeology); Perception; Psychology; Test (biology); Experiential education; Wildlife conservation; Applied psychology; Risk perception; Medical education; Social psychology; Ecology; Medicine; Geography; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.30049598923513654,"score_gpt":0.5025107018840484,"score_spread":0.2020147126489119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914058545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988127,0.000018483188,0.0003308778,0.00004876512,0.0000063977877,0.000052591367,0.0000060980615,0.000010839674,0.0007132499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952779,0.000080927624,0.0018277925,0.00006977335,0.000011321266,0.00021236093,0.000030036343,0.000003359043,0.0024865693],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996543,0.00012257717,0.000010708916,0.000060346072,0.000054119413,0.00009800638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883884,0.00046143125,0.00013417509,0.000089233814,0.000075057826,0.0004012591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009880239,0.0004199072,0.00022403453,0.00019022134,0.0004782929,0.0005863436,0.00032632254,0.00042650558,0.003667043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002348148,0.00016391515,0.00024774208,0.00008308478,0.00043854883,0.00032361937,0.000973727,0.00093105563,0.000389905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005079845,0.15531874,0.13484713,0.0011013203,0.00016684548,0.00096268294,0.073676534,0.0008215019,0.15438902,0.0005874563,0.003408847,0.46964005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009417324,0.07928961,0.8249401,0.00030645996,0.0002588663,0.00080759544,0.039516103,0.001927488,0.03956976,0.0006680376,0.011642414,0.00013182678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005446979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001233808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003667043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020128571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038039568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01226753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914884946","doi":"10.1071/wr17151","title":"Incorporating movement patterns to discern habitat selection: black bears as a case study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Florida","keywords":"Habitat; Selection (genetic algorithm); Movement (music); Ursus; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Geography; Land cover; Wetland; Wildlife; Biology; Land use; Population; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.03956813917136503,"score_gpt":0.3367622878287954,"score_spread":0.2971941486574304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914884946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99817395,0.00007200843,0.0013217337,0.00006255628,0.000003001579,0.000018085428,0.000113801456,0.000005821216,0.00022905739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99275744,0.0001760588,0.0065034754,0.000022625863,0.00001647403,0.000027020948,0.00023841663,0.0000062480085,0.00025219403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968004,0.00014559078,0.000023388173,0.000066223554,0.000040288767,0.000044522934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929893,0.0003772893,0.00014540265,0.00006548875,0.000058294692,0.00005454045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011037556,0.00038918108,0.00031566343,0.0008723006,0.00092650176,0.0006122015,0.00039173916,0.0005733854,0.0004373569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016219073,0.00016117084,0.0005590727,0.00077112566,0.0004226874,0.0004956992,0.00057063706,0.00036223768,0.00007635653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000228379,0.00025824172,0.9420088,0.000079510784,0.00015353813,0.00498745,0.0042977654,0.011153319,0.0024014898,0.00069573487,0.00061425386,0.033121504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027604496,0.0006557838,0.9196369,0.000065728236,0.00025060284,0.003204862,0.010302262,0.05897197,0.0022526248,0.0014470187,0.0031205805,0.00006399633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022562917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05020371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022562917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043077325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044204024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044863164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942919807","doi":"10.1071/wr18025","title":"Modelling the rate of successful search of red foxes during population control","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Population; Statistics; Context (archaeology); Approximate Bayesian computation; Sampling (signal processing); Bayesian inference; Econometrics; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.03555976875652758,"score_gpt":0.29466753293272907,"score_spread":0.2591077641762015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942919807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76722604,0.0002646311,0.22812381,0.00039464072,0.000017170007,0.00008473308,0.0002937753,0.00014211409,0.0034529744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930188,0.000076433986,0.005695318,0.000019043333,0.0000064503693,0.000053069085,0.00009571074,0.000012659972,0.0010224829],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991942,0.00028390132,0.000033637854,0.0002940567,0.0000726036,0.00012163339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940399,0.004037686,0.00118325,0.00030986915,0.00025779565,0.00017156082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032984773,0.0005021146,0.00068896223,0.0008600849,0.00036804102,0.0011279699,0.0019056131,0.001606382,0.002118869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013239855,0.00074947753,0.0010414276,0.00042973555,0.0014445598,0.0018390389,0.0010702264,0.0009987211,0.00023754014],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076385404,0.000046778063,0.02069703,0.000052366468,0.00006187372,0.00010979335,0.0002287775,0.95458937,0.0019157269,0.017976474,0.00015487583,0.0040904656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009003244,0.000055036693,0.0073795263,0.000011154522,0.000023729075,0.000068964895,0.00003368297,0.9869387,0.00023810852,0.0050095166,0.00021593383,0.000016604441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016262762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010252095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016262762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015819112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007364061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032336235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943603458","doi":"10.1071/wr18001","title":"Bird community responses to changes in vegetation caused by increasing large mammal populations in the Serengeti woodlands","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Woodland; Rarefaction (ecology); Biodiversity; Geography; National park; Context (archaeology); Biology; Vegetation (pathology); Snag; Wildebeest","score_opus":0.09696394212855972,"score_gpt":0.363594627874314,"score_spread":0.2666306857457543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943603458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997776,0.00003009874,0.000010155743,0.000009753977,0.0000025913835,0.0000019962404,0.000027494063,7.942131e-7,0.0001394301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998355,0.000024902136,0.0000271142,0.000014467403,0.000003956933,0.0000038616276,0.000037227383,3.066101e-7,0.000052686508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999057,0.000025130154,0.0000042508564,0.00001956888,0.000008050768,0.00003718224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997118,0.000042296593,0.00010057466,0.000010201191,0.000023511939,0.00011157706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023929618,0.00018917154,0.00011984083,0.00035897404,0.0003741015,0.00034071587,0.00014716547,0.0001915688,0.0010459531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045721722,0.00010423251,0.00014624932,0.00017655952,0.00042493647,0.00019676132,0.00030001052,0.00024510152,0.00009671597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004494472,0.00015444311,0.9792086,0.00005289309,0.00004715247,0.00040096382,0.0009483742,0.00023379584,0.0137921,0.00002593449,0.00017070533,0.004515657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022340762,0.00007818472,0.99929345,0.0000023024952,0.0000039391857,0.000033554017,0.0003999932,0.000044537857,0.00008347592,0.0000047341014,0.00005274706,7.5176666e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068049594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020191591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068049594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004819462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001816982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013530731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956170408","doi":"10.1071/wr18079","title":"The use of contraceptive techniques in managed wild African lion (Panthera leo) populations to mimic open system cub recruitment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cascades (Canada); University College of the North","funders":"","keywords":"Panthera; Population control; Population; Fecundity; Hysterectomy; Context (archaeology); Medicine; Litter; Wildlife; Demography; Biology; Surgery; Ecology; Environmental health; Family planning","score_opus":0.25823319794989463,"score_gpt":0.3924536346858932,"score_spread":0.1342204367359986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956170408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994599,0.00006290758,0.00005893203,0.000019961019,0.0000012914286,0.000021508993,0.000029831339,0.0000023918765,0.0003432499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822634,0.00015020402,0.0008429283,0.000036911973,0.0000041058543,0.000108484324,0.000083986786,0.0000012806735,0.0005457573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998436,0.00006288829,0.000009551382,0.00003056594,0.000030450605,0.000023054608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995426,0.00011388514,0.00023567794,0.00003277903,0.000031460877,0.000043569267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034582822,0.00011866117,0.00011406907,0.0002916341,0.00033148588,0.00021130675,0.0002637073,0.00020174801,0.0013466772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092595327,0.00008256075,0.000091034926,0.00013561451,0.0003582544,0.00019662628,0.00026677936,0.00012778208,0.00010446964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014433317,0.0013236208,0.8106345,0.00039149448,0.00007647752,0.0010211039,0.0032185866,0.00069445465,0.09025818,0.00019454751,0.00048119063,0.090262525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036573965,0.006833894,0.98361176,0.000040363524,0.00003250283,0.0007897381,0.0017877955,0.00041186073,0.0038816342,0.00006555803,0.0024966921,0.000011580822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025350486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017405855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025350486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041139862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035336852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005040586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981361409","doi":"10.1071/wr18122","title":"Estimating kangaroo density by aerial survey: a comparison of thermal cameras with human observers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lethbridge College","funders":"","keywords":"Aerial survey; Wildlife; Transect; Wildlife management; Geography; Population; Ecology; Distance sampling; Habitat; Animal ecology; Population density; Camera trap; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Survey methodology; Photogrammetry; Remote sensing; Biology; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06558777232214827,"score_gpt":0.3466673594029797,"score_spread":0.2810795870808315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981361409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915474,0.00029828615,0.005606507,0.000020396661,0.000014252519,0.000098749784,0.0003112928,0.00003807626,0.0020650094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99336076,0.00014451092,0.0058716363,0.00001706164,0.000009188464,0.000051225772,0.00023430794,0.0000058688734,0.0003053353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731135,0.0014670343,0.00022726519,0.00043475308,0.00047474328,0.00008482857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99175256,0.004080972,0.0018244362,0.00039708457,0.0017280879,0.0002168435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028421313,0.0003951446,0.00028684587,0.0014010519,0.00020533889,0.0005447426,0.00040541744,0.00035458556,0.0010663891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010588747,0.00024372037,0.0003729716,0.0005930614,0.0002998452,0.0007686495,0.0005667474,0.00018244644,0.00042696384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011576364,0.00015539509,0.9286449,0.0003721527,0.00033281837,0.00011978628,0.002119623,0.0023300762,0.008337136,0.00008651876,0.00027261765,0.05607134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026396825,0.00137171,0.9788681,0.00009832887,0.00019718161,0.0005369719,0.0026213157,0.011859556,0.0035324744,0.00008874831,0.0007551956,0.000044015967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045263837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008834611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045263837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033061448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014710275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015030801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022285466","doi":"10.1071/wr19105","title":"Wild-born versus captive-bred: a comparison of survival and refuge selection by translocated numbats (Myrmecobius fasciatus)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Captive breeding; Predation; Threatened species; Captivity; Population; Wildlife; Habitat; Zoology; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Wildlife conservation; Endangered species; Demography","score_opus":0.0826388349827848,"score_gpt":0.34859582161765257,"score_spread":0.2659569866348678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022285466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998135,0.000029526027,0.000014847567,0.000004717024,0.0000010220298,0.0000025635768,0.00002339299,6.341904e-7,0.000109805915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944144,0.000026839429,0.000080490005,0.000016551812,0.0000011980239,0.00001002008,0.000069906244,9.704013e-7,0.00035267303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998313,0.000041907624,0.000007638993,0.000058287107,0.000023278195,0.000037632013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993548,0.000068487825,0.0002706783,0.00003494468,0.00006524747,0.00020580557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028779806,0.00018649534,0.00023391981,0.0003197948,0.0004027639,0.00039055917,0.00027541377,0.0002802243,0.0013228782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065246044,0.0001277816,0.00011056467,0.00014688382,0.0005894925,0.00031200427,0.00036411904,0.00023045791,0.00027451146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005852566,0.00039804907,0.9589646,0.0000622938,0.000051988885,0.0005630927,0.00306622,0.0000960688,0.029037192,0.000046646066,0.00018043813,0.0069481763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002213714,0.00048234433,0.9979479,0.0000050604135,0.0000066551383,0.00015663817,0.00097133213,0.00004037641,0.00023123805,0.000008734801,0.00014467542,0.00000294816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005951927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031691983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005951927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041791252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015973591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011834621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025298991","doi":"10.1071/wr18200","title":"Please come again: attractive bait augments recapture rates of capture-naïve snowshoe hares","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; The Scarborough Hospital; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Population; Ecology; Toxicology; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.09085990576750817,"score_gpt":0.34486333218219156,"score_spread":0.2540034264146834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025298991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992567,0.000108525994,0.0002540669,0.000029500834,0.000020879757,0.000012960716,0.000048500155,0.000017960056,0.00025102697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815136,0.000079418285,0.000813037,0.00011171036,0.000024274324,0.000037264086,0.00009154083,0.0000099164,0.00068144314],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996425,0.00011361911,0.000019134262,0.000107617256,0.00006664478,0.000050470466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990689,0.0003017027,0.00017902964,0.00010336402,0.0001130007,0.00023405717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076792843,0.000236603,0.00041093826,0.000284426,0.00024657938,0.00046235384,0.00025802242,0.00038759157,0.0021857803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014394548,0.00015327873,0.00023310185,0.00008384592,0.00030111088,0.000385759,0.00038077647,0.00043648228,0.00032224754],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006753455,0.0017069653,0.27984646,0.0005687218,0.00043157794,0.00076642545,0.0018785017,0.0010507526,0.6507957,0.00025513305,0.0017704729,0.05417592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011796761,0.022924995,0.9043633,0.00009288455,0.000331967,0.00079523376,0.0014109586,0.0044622077,0.061697654,0.0002530174,0.003488493,0.000061262224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080905017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020559614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021857803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001365937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109611385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0073121786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025645786","doi":"10.1071/wr19100","title":"Sources and dynamics of international funding for waterfowl conservation in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Nature Conservancy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Waterfowl; Geography; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Wildlife management; Government (linguistics); Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.2698227841606925,"score_gpt":0.3074252366812406,"score_spread":0.03760245252054811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025645786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98375666,0.00097127736,0.0003795357,0.0019132728,0.000029112527,0.000042469634,0.005295722,0.000032736654,0.0075792773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99312913,0.0010659774,0.0010222021,0.00015653268,0.000025364632,0.00007141025,0.0025307718,0.000013586605,0.0019850251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988912,0.00016944231,0.00007738746,0.00021127997,0.0003642373,0.0002864821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162185,0.001227822,0.0035395923,0.00027523751,0.0022077444,0.001127841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013270336,0.00016800656,0.00014099113,0.0031222233,0.0007009138,0.0012884537,0.0006615404,0.00023795203,0.0019779848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073410296,0.00016355077,0.00017327133,0.0042986753,0.0006175781,0.00071487675,0.0015171227,0.00045833693,0.000100865276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049955677,0.000029546964,0.95397353,0.00013238357,0.00010012516,0.00017855436,0.0033096748,0.0004928725,0.00041872755,0.0014257164,0.008120904,0.031767968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044349144,0.000007130565,0.9906031,0.0000918245,0.00002060348,0.000063759166,0.002417881,0.000344994,0.0000622411,0.00009066257,0.0062834644,0.000009921719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56491923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76586163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56491923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041590272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071732444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8752861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035365993","doi":"10.1071/wr19165","title":"Climatic correlates of migrant Natal long-fingered bat (Miniopterus natalensis) phenology in north-eastern South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Phenology; Geography; Ecology; Population; Cave; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.1047097711205216,"score_gpt":0.28619942742997945,"score_spread":0.18148965630945785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035365993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996226,0.00005213067,0.00003083807,0.000012028558,9.859104e-7,0.0000021350713,0.00016585492,0.0000011379403,0.00011226362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972194,0.000046561927,0.00004687041,0.000003445034,0.0000014145891,0.000005454593,0.00012504903,9.108761e-7,0.00004826912],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998809,0.000027638609,0.00000973105,0.00003732638,0.000013765566,0.00003058554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953437,0.00009661983,0.00023092682,0.000026081469,0.000051512638,0.00006055547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021851044,0.00014616763,0.00017900663,0.0004941737,0.00029784994,0.00035073792,0.000139382,0.00012883772,0.0011727823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079270755,0.00012913253,0.000138691,0.00075441715,0.00026317107,0.00025790412,0.00038177092,0.00014200577,0.00010224816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053695967,0.000019459301,0.9928093,0.00004117448,0.000040948224,0.00014118376,0.0010377264,0.00021538035,0.003132996,0.000041771065,0.00010773902,0.0023586086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.3871335e-7,0.0000065658105,0.99936146,0.0000050445187,0.0000034922505,0.000028635975,0.0003856007,0.00007915571,0.000031681146,0.0000055115884,0.00009113322,0.0000010513144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022439135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063003846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022439135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003814257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028061253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044616997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084408974","doi":"10.1071/wr19232","title":"Determining marine mammal detection functions for a stationary land-based survey site","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada; Government of British Columbia; Vancouver Native Health Society","funders":"","keywords":"Porpoise; Posterior probability; Prior probability; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Range (aeronautics); Bayesian probability; Statistical power; Computer science; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Ecology; Mathematics; Geography; Biology; Engineering; Detector","score_opus":0.14372953481654538,"score_gpt":0.34932907717811723,"score_spread":0.20559954236157185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084408974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88781697,0.00009613559,0.11062998,0.000043516116,0.000004727945,0.00002764415,0.00037813158,0.00023416258,0.0007686378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738149,0.000024528848,0.025420224,0.000010109343,0.000002972527,0.00001981336,0.0005428719,0.000020897882,0.00014363459],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867,0.00040313427,0.00007900188,0.00047296644,0.00027980647,0.000095128846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98999757,0.0069771498,0.0010044378,0.00086072163,0.0010026013,0.00015752575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044281236,0.00035688386,0.0003752613,0.0017337442,0.0003817094,0.0008725896,0.00078827713,0.0006472576,0.0007383346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020030716,0.00027909275,0.0007555179,0.0007487283,0.00051859603,0.00068929914,0.00063589873,0.00044272692,0.0004058455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021594924,0.00011619995,0.6990551,0.00014332258,0.0002867186,0.00017148511,0.0003830768,0.19999197,0.011536982,0.0024848082,0.0006588571,0.084955595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098954715,0.000092337374,0.24391681,0.000033800596,0.000048804675,0.0003387981,0.00016135392,0.7455195,0.0072230725,0.001938407,0.00067267776,0.000044620618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075580245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074686348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075580245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080040004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005269209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023418427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112467131","doi":"10.1071/wr20205","title":"Estimating habitat characteristics associated with the abundance of free-roaming domestic cats across the annual cycle","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Temperate climate; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.03442932939035959,"score_gpt":0.4038753923181765,"score_spread":0.3694460629278169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112467131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989466,0.000079042155,0.00011668056,0.000010771195,0.000001257169,0.000011856827,0.00045584023,0.000003144195,0.0003747984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866235,0.00006344717,0.0003683719,0.000008951484,0.0000014970577,0.000012847942,0.0006166701,0.0000013780301,0.00026443938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984646,0.000024561054,0.000012439259,0.000046590383,0.000030198142,0.000039825944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990627,0.000119093915,0.00045626596,0.000037822403,0.00015983696,0.00016424665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027160972,0.0001462595,0.0001806956,0.00077155087,0.00044942315,0.00052369206,0.0003265472,0.00020023843,0.0010522562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011189821,0.00014716224,0.00017794032,0.0007403243,0.00026182286,0.0002610011,0.00026380137,0.00012255603,0.00014293689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015665524,0.00000794459,0.998517,0.000006472064,0.000011762817,0.000013479051,0.00008290541,0.000045113164,0.0002372277,0.000004924917,0.000053028652,0.0010047181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.7612847e-7,0.000007641597,0.99974865,0.0000015759435,0.0000023860005,0.000011679468,0.00009693868,0.00006948182,0.00001460499,0.0000023953733,0.000043882315,5.266772e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25511882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6323717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25511882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011737428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074945536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5072677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135501971","doi":"10.1071/wr20002","title":"Short-term responses of tree squirrels to different-sized forest patches on new clearcuts in a fragmented forest landscape","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Basal area; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Context (archaeology); Biology; Clearcutting; Geography; Forestry","score_opus":0.08430192038562143,"score_gpt":0.3664403910950842,"score_spread":0.28213847070946274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135501971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99984884,0.000017482853,0.000008937503,0.0000023801665,6.92528e-7,0.000001723647,0.000051705218,8.7287475e-7,0.000067326946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995858,0.000013915291,0.000025163572,0.00000944039,0.0000012470357,0.0000044849394,0.00016202872,5.941917e-7,0.00019737022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998271,0.00002168154,0.000008830331,0.000057468143,0.00003806775,0.000046927846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908936,0.000073025105,0.00030177418,0.000049134112,0.00016624026,0.00032044447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026770096,0.00019860944,0.00028495636,0.0004262993,0.00047824165,0.0005041516,0.00028626752,0.0002265026,0.0010282241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006284419,0.00017267377,0.0002153096,0.00023691496,0.0004341837,0.00021127812,0.00036528744,0.0003065916,0.0001607048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030173274,0.00009283493,0.98791295,0.000013271037,0.00006141219,0.000053068205,0.00032721466,0.000100003184,0.009512052,0.0000067690607,0.00008872118,0.0015299845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.5851443e-7,0.000031316307,0.9997862,8.0294996e-7,0.000002401896,0.000005950932,0.000080190235,0.000024264049,0.000048706024,0.000001117792,0.000017762102,5.2813596e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07135246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.267683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07135246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010551653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036053968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14187425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154290918","doi":"10.1071/wr20090","title":"Developing a correction factor to apply to animal–vehicle collision data for improved road mitigation measures","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Mount Royal University","funders":"Calgary Foundation; Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Transport engineering; Survey data collection; Collision; Wildlife; Transect; Data collection; Geography; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Engineering; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.13520283629586838,"score_gpt":0.3956945200908828,"score_spread":0.2604916837950144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154290918","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07929947,0.0007870738,0.8956736,0.0011773035,0.0008373971,0.0024649715,0.0052510807,0.009130172,0.005379027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18209814,0.00027055817,0.81112456,0.00020441314,0.0001092712,0.001283927,0.0029777032,0.00064770627,0.00128378],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98983824,0.003259593,0.0014250928,0.0018315768,0.0031385417,0.0005070472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9273018,0.03282316,0.006847811,0.006365385,0.025918866,0.00074285053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017940903,0.0018887357,0.0012283992,0.0059485054,0.001242808,0.0028810864,0.0020685242,0.0015266677,0.0070973425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1347887,0.0008261478,0.0023341463,0.005037459,0.00074285327,0.003343498,0.0022539468,0.0019206501,0.003499326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051860616,0.00057630433,0.22517885,0.00224505,0.0008303628,0.00037816647,0.0014634446,0.03644244,0.010429673,0.005728454,0.026420798,0.68978786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027062208,0.0012841369,0.19654648,0.0018662241,0.0008106415,0.0011258277,0.003010266,0.6341711,0.031992007,0.01570537,0.11263741,0.0005798559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024535073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021534758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024535073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017609517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037642496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09488171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155357019","doi":"10.1071/wr20071","title":"The demographics of knowledge, attitudes and emotions toward coyotes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Visitor pattern; Context (archaeology); Demographics; Psychology; Wildlife; National park; Social psychology; Demography; Geography; Ecology; Sociology","score_opus":0.17503965124488804,"score_gpt":0.4628966145055244,"score_spread":0.28785696326063637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155357019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993235,0.000022030741,0.000011206206,0.0000360045,0.0000013083109,0.0000048003667,0.00009473908,3.3175385e-7,0.00050613686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935764,0.00004031228,0.000020857447,0.000019688952,0.0000024194958,0.0000071840805,0.000104902,3.7949454e-7,0.00044663457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966955,0.0000501785,0.000018185427,0.00005784809,0.00010661599,0.00009754695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998073,0.00024614495,0.00062444457,0.000053193045,0.0005046387,0.0004986458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047285913,0.000117606454,0.00014224727,0.00050494034,0.00089740736,0.000819349,0.00025370173,0.0002767264,0.002843475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002536877,0.0001313652,0.00013630485,0.00042271957,0.00068785413,0.0004222854,0.00038106574,0.00047435006,0.0002278527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023412353,0.00004687741,0.99530184,0.000008118044,0.000007415181,0.000062092826,0.0025348747,0.000014219716,0.00017063147,0.000015048591,0.00017210937,0.0016433366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.802001e-7,0.000023007966,0.9943639,0.0000056580325,0.0000024251026,0.00004404592,0.0053282576,0.000025272779,0.000027094786,0.0000056001304,0.00017162772,0.0000023720588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2880619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43930683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2880619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013186836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013558852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57277036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159862550","doi":"10.1071/wr20107","title":"Animal welfare testing for shooting and darting free-ranging wildlife: a review and recommendations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Saskatchewan Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Ammunition; Wildlife; Animal welfare; Ballistics; Small arms; Harm; Risk analysis (engineering); Projectile; Aeronautics; Fishery; Engineering; Business; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Physics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14539290800943594,"score_gpt":0.4091778042582288,"score_spread":0.26378489624879287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159862550","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001532166,0.9959544,0.0004955922,0.0020950648,0.000385357,0.000068462614,0.00011156467,0.000020460213,0.0007158772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006272415,0.9966449,0.0013568677,0.000647235,0.00015447734,0.000092442366,0.0001037269,0.0000043379846,0.00036876753],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755496,0.0005917301,0.00079888944,0.00022690376,0.0007262527,0.00010135403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858867,0.007026193,0.0023028466,0.0002470078,0.0042300955,0.00030719486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006782106,0.0012807797,0.0025889778,0.0067381826,0.00047933377,0.0018548003,0.0028766938,0.0023584643,0.0059341006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009780171,0.0005986097,0.0026489282,0.004503486,0.000914961,0.003086207,0.0009510865,0.001845019,0.002259285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010378078,0.00014279931,0.0006000379,0.13604644,0.00034728093,0.00024826647,0.00020049437,0.00027128594,0.0010173859,0.0017520526,0.03741196,0.8218581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050867573,0.00027777004,0.0038902948,0.19391923,0.0016708454,0.0011095611,0.0003853973,0.00020866843,0.00068919215,0.0022435295,0.7954763,0.00007831591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065114126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011106699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006782106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014949242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062086633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03586757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193946360","doi":"10.1071/wr20169","title":"A comparison of manual and automated detection of rusa deer (Rusa timorensis) from RPAS-derived thermal imagery","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Sampling (signal processing); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Computer vision","score_opus":0.048367549868040885,"score_gpt":0.3568360006198127,"score_spread":0.3084684507517718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193946360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858819,0.00033475427,0.011719595,0.000026667756,0.00002397704,0.000105223364,0.0004754577,0.00020417037,0.0012282967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95901394,0.00017369818,0.03924507,0.00003155827,0.000028671095,0.00008492648,0.00069455395,0.000027152679,0.0007003449],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820685,0.00061565125,0.00013186107,0.00042188016,0.0005408232,0.00008292046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99419844,0.0019950352,0.0016110091,0.00029539602,0.0017422491,0.00015793627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021829773,0.00040020666,0.00038302827,0.001962985,0.00022106367,0.0007244574,0.00070958585,0.00031418924,0.0007258443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052000135,0.00022527194,0.00032138263,0.0006282868,0.000207298,0.00056766917,0.00036671312,0.00016511093,0.00035002056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001885209,0.0003235446,0.65567183,0.00083237997,0.0004938428,0.0002239829,0.00087235385,0.0094980495,0.07546055,0.00019414446,0.0015239163,0.2530201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032080807,0.0010215137,0.88075083,0.00012028071,0.0002533029,0.0005827803,0.0005323178,0.08966504,0.02510669,0.00014439702,0.0017237725,0.000067029796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045838794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015229764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045838794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032846368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023691043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011544824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205176644","doi":"10.1071/wr21072","title":"Estimating and validating koala Phascolarctos cinereus density estimates from acoustic arrays using spatial count modelling","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Precision Nanosystems (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Phascolarctos cinereus; Threatened species; Context (archaeology); Biology; Ecology; Animal ecology; Habitat; Statistics; Population; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.07953362133979813,"score_gpt":0.32969260242988335,"score_spread":0.2501589810900852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205176644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68640363,0.00026471177,0.30666426,0.0001746359,0.000036978297,0.00020195042,0.0013450149,0.00074613956,0.0041627437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8776706,0.00016300268,0.119289145,0.000058948284,0.0000147139,0.0004356931,0.0012458103,0.00011976134,0.0010023412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586004,0.001866277,0.00027918423,0.00094506174,0.00089718716,0.00015225679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761623,0.01441862,0.0036323585,0.0023799278,0.003153716,0.00025303956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066337273,0.000766173,0.0007473682,0.001843533,0.0005596888,0.0018866701,0.0021448336,0.00073283643,0.0016161682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029358232,0.001041505,0.0011162625,0.0012414508,0.0010333532,0.0017501785,0.0022109204,0.0008137402,0.0010286033],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032343913,0.00012483158,0.6375167,0.00063307164,0.00048303226,0.00025100235,0.0018158887,0.26519206,0.011616559,0.0038903693,0.0010848137,0.0770683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022359138,0.00024045813,0.15589899,0.00018294418,0.00015199995,0.00038713092,0.0007420596,0.8312026,0.005375198,0.0033865906,0.0023214335,0.00008812281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01569491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02621299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01569491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010743958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008152502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035082936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226048888","doi":"10.1071/wr21060","title":"Grizzly bear response to translocation into a novel environment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Saskatchewan; Golder Associates (Canada); Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"fRI Research; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Ursus; Habitat; Wildlife; National park; Grizzly Bears; Context (archaeology); Recreation; Wildlife management; Geography; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Biology; Population; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04259597857727101,"score_gpt":0.3073954399143602,"score_spread":0.2647994613370892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226048888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995834,0.000035040885,0.00009555936,0.000032546992,0.0000036413776,0.0000037467912,0.000019123867,0.0000021360834,0.00022478336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992976,0.000067120054,0.00020350527,0.000054741,0.00000993978,0.000011298836,0.00008882191,0.0000020961988,0.0002649654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996996,0.0000831849,0.00001534016,0.00009357995,0.00004470071,0.00006365775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924135,0.00007724071,0.0003958892,0.00008070121,0.000057830097,0.00014713044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004797621,0.00018486017,0.00028008706,0.00021013379,0.0009814309,0.00047191943,0.00028808904,0.00038286197,0.0011776641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010534548,0.00010395508,0.0002655848,0.00019849814,0.0007817489,0.0004300548,0.0009401803,0.0005143539,0.00021980997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002647383,0.00013950422,0.975009,0.000033581393,0.00007486146,0.0014729813,0.003519659,0.00028163783,0.011325925,0.00008881443,0.0003137271,0.007475485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031876357,0.00031634115,0.9946831,0.000008394362,0.0000142624685,0.00060122245,0.0031828866,0.000117701515,0.00037113807,0.00006406679,0.00063160533,0.000006028924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031259446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010121613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031259446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028816104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022653998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006215453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312325762","doi":"10.1071/wr21159","title":"Snow track counts for density estimation of mammalian predators in the boreal forest","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia; University of Alberta; Yukon Agricultural Association; Okanagan University College; Ministry of Environment; Ministry of Forests; Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Snow; Transect; Physical geography; Boreal; Taiga; Ecology; Environmental science; Abundance (ecology); Population; Geography; Population density; Biology; Meteorology; Demography","score_opus":0.04582134292146169,"score_gpt":0.3232375918135217,"score_spread":0.27741624889206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312325762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398566,0.0031302788,0.040762693,0.00020559777,0.00016570136,0.00047232612,0.007143504,0.0004637169,0.0077994973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582704,0.0006798157,0.036508743,0.00009914819,0.00009826925,0.0003264602,0.0031282306,0.000044556647,0.00084443385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981066,0.00079346023,0.00017836732,0.00030582948,0.0005341834,0.00008150184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206406,0.0015575609,0.003869987,0.00049462396,0.0016989702,0.0003148719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002914942,0.00047245636,0.00040442578,0.0017093485,0.0006418025,0.0008370062,0.0009421796,0.0002579186,0.0015222533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009461657,0.0003396915,0.00034952338,0.0015270741,0.00029024025,0.00083686906,0.00044319945,0.0002489575,0.00044497382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008616367,0.000019996842,0.9685316,0.000087347864,0.000110370456,0.00003327994,0.00015367352,0.0010003825,0.0007797505,0.00007085542,0.0014012874,0.027725223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009626536,0.00009692665,0.99256355,0.000054424974,0.000038571896,0.000100391,0.00020276986,0.0050727534,0.00027390267,0.00013194412,0.0014447663,0.0000104812625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114600345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28285003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114600345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007676398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092584034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22786665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312727825","doi":"10.1071/wr22079","title":"Abundance, demography, and harvesting of water snakes from agricultural landscapes in West Java, Indonesia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Context (archaeology); Population; Fishery; Biology; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.021562082525784464,"score_gpt":0.2644334593295506,"score_spread":0.24287137680376614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312727825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994424,0.00003851701,0.000043660562,0.000013114918,7.115923e-7,0.0000030723538,0.00007372356,0.0000012671383,0.00038349893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954826,0.00006693053,0.00012412439,0.000011715553,0.0000011441987,0.0000054158713,0.00008615483,8.9830684e-7,0.00015523676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999261,0.000017152193,0.000008951945,0.000022404796,0.000011708945,0.000013668936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998698,0.000017220524,0.000062544765,0.000006908462,0.0000141635155,0.000029322613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013640666,0.00009774047,0.000095733536,0.00047356807,0.00021001982,0.00027195332,0.00013067195,0.000083967294,0.00072759506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023663616,0.00010291137,0.0000851834,0.00045332525,0.0002714583,0.0002381211,0.0002770173,0.000115254064,0.000101059755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002550433,0.000023227009,0.9906804,0.000023537224,0.000010705633,0.00018470116,0.0016684107,0.0000534699,0.0015424958,0.000033155728,0.00011465358,0.005639703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.312277e-7,0.0000107173655,0.99854517,0.0000038033681,0.0000030576634,0.00015319794,0.0010376504,0.00007275822,0.000038846076,0.000009792019,0.00012327563,0.0000012915392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00947052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032636672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00947052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020412372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001328101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018830776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312779280","doi":"10.1071/wr22040","title":"Nutritional stress and population density influence risk/reward decisions by elk","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Forage; Foraging; Neophobia; Context (archaeology); Population; Ecology; Population density; Biology; Density dependence; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.029537422868897538,"score_gpt":0.305519479235062,"score_spread":0.27598205636616446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312779280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999681,0.00002854992,0.000056295466,0.0000071050786,0.000001170127,0.0000017298847,0.00002464685,0.0000023991618,0.00019715515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893457,0.000042735814,0.00021712456,0.00003132316,0.0000028346667,0.00001108555,0.00007852953,0.0000045804973,0.0006771894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998253,0.000041927156,0.000011108712,0.00005969727,0.00002275741,0.000039311457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996387,0.000089649744,0.000113145834,0.000032243206,0.000035220295,0.0000910459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001843425,0.0002451062,0.00032119607,0.00018670563,0.00019957608,0.0005904028,0.0002494767,0.0002334713,0.0016041364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061281095,0.00015752546,0.00019203368,0.000104428706,0.00024843655,0.00026925726,0.00042092058,0.00034323276,0.00029811787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019181399,0.000717185,0.80359304,0.00009715633,0.00018289611,0.00049203995,0.00102974,0.00084128027,0.1738808,0.00008057793,0.00037257076,0.016794585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006178229,0.00042737124,0.99668616,0.000005305951,0.000023449767,0.00008104383,0.00040796326,0.0006083396,0.001564001,0.000044986664,0.00013795003,0.000007149327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017402928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005254767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017402928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003002566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110120964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005366385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313012103","doi":"10.1071/wr22070","title":"Evaluation of oral baits and distribution methods for Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii)†","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Veterinary Oncology Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Captivity; Wildlife; Biology; Rodenticide; Context (archaeology); Palatability; Population; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Zoology; Ecology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.3683504722524182,"score_gpt":0.5847701232016518,"score_spread":0.2164196509492336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313012103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967705,0.00080633326,0.0009389611,0.00008329074,0.000020435074,0.00057188445,0.00022570447,0.000025738958,0.00055714144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793676,0.001025764,0.016646054,0.00008601347,0.0000278906,0.00041901207,0.0004130454,0.000013786679,0.0020007198],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988544,0.00030713435,0.00011242528,0.00021993212,0.00043175652,0.00007441863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855274,0.00033018406,0.00048974087,0.00006904572,0.00040543673,0.00015285787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017288284,0.00068572495,0.00041186044,0.0005710642,0.00036540796,0.00051295443,0.000741561,0.00048856984,0.0021871785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022538698,0.0002197182,0.0004433218,0.0002373785,0.00042425806,0.00065327145,0.00044898383,0.0003594427,0.00026151576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009589694,0.004879735,0.102318,0.00482887,0.0004982641,0.0004779986,0.0018925108,0.0025387318,0.69446164,0.00033309872,0.00094479235,0.17723659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008155006,0.2544911,0.34068024,0.0004718433,0.0017357571,0.0019183448,0.0026073058,0.015637886,0.36857173,0.00021024937,0.0126785785,0.00018148222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006344426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01621357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006344426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011224673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054128596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012615025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429964","doi":"10.1071/wr22005","title":"‘It’s a people problem, not a goat problem.’ Mitigating human–mountain goat interactions in a Canadian Provincial Park","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Human–wildlife conflict; Context (archaeology); National park; Wildlife management; Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Ecology","score_opus":0.0551905491669633,"score_gpt":0.348057412279052,"score_spread":0.2928668631120887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313429964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81237173,0.00566651,0.0025602016,0.098153114,0.0007767503,0.00026253355,0.00045185027,0.00008551354,0.07967178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787676,0.0018190398,0.0019782234,0.006490674,0.000059523125,0.00005080515,0.00009750854,0.000023290148,0.010713427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793017,0.00061923807,0.000042128828,0.00017484745,0.00048801626,0.0007457027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965953,0.00056743406,0.0003857054,0.000099989855,0.0009631345,0.0013884091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021164948,0.00024081272,0.000256475,0.00056795223,0.020208895,0.003499299,0.001360426,0.0012074284,0.0052774874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004744477,0.00023295122,0.00025613094,0.00094713207,0.007121149,0.0018353374,0.0025648507,0.0018917902,0.00022355637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012639022,0.00018697674,0.2520638,0.0010838606,0.00011223243,0.006828116,0.48854625,0.0004425256,0.003263199,0.011867164,0.11035899,0.12512045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020534013,0.00012262596,0.15158392,0.00071119046,0.00006186707,0.0015076743,0.5797205,0.0003622945,0.0003507419,0.0017340106,0.2637136,0.00011111938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9457491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98250705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054250896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025187936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04574602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18275213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320186152","doi":"10.1071/wr22078","title":"Habitat structure facilitates coexistence of native and invasive mesopredators in an Australian tropical savanna","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rio Tinto; Department of Education, Skills and Employment, Australian Government","keywords":"Ecology; Feral cat; Threatened species; Habitat; Geography; Population; Mesopredator release hypothesis; Biology; Apex predator; Predation","score_opus":0.07565060742899311,"score_gpt":0.3524128551539755,"score_spread":0.2767622477249824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320186152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996792,0.000048498223,0.00006936551,0.000013860511,3.9120187e-7,0.000002332755,0.000023359486,0.000001991583,0.00016102512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998006,0.000020868303,0.00010171821,0.0000058997875,5.699826e-7,0.000002131175,0.000016565515,7.054124e-7,0.000051006984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997497,0.000083568535,0.000011992035,0.00007674247,0.000025825468,0.000052016512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993636,0.00015896482,0.00027183187,0.00003888444,0.000050971175,0.000115688956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040717737,0.00015830515,0.0002277163,0.0006237024,0.0004639958,0.00055416947,0.000337161,0.00022951436,0.0013190202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001034625,0.00022065242,0.00025691555,0.00041946175,0.0008170841,0.00037225493,0.00071815774,0.00015873804,0.00007814031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009963962,0.000057908594,0.9805951,0.00010706053,0.000092325754,0.0003024163,0.0025928377,0.0010828751,0.010411149,0.00015527468,0.000111607034,0.004391628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.5858903e-7,0.000020291525,0.99890983,0.0000038183334,0.000007888875,0.00005162125,0.00031878526,0.00056557875,0.00003536924,0.000023672888,0.000060266066,0.0000020519117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05617517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13175783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05617517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089158065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004196621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11169642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321349687","doi":"10.1071/wr22113","title":"Is regional variability in environmental conditions driving differences in the early body condition of endemic Australian fur seal pups?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Fur seal; Phenology; Biology; Seasonal breeder; Range (aeronautics); Juvenile; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Population; Zoology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.10631557473426198,"score_gpt":0.36356293334661777,"score_spread":0.2572473586123558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321349687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991115,0.00010439448,0.00011975793,0.000038723887,0.0000037775205,0.0000044686317,0.0002222124,0.000002473331,0.00039264045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937135,0.000064485,0.00020975595,0.00002656784,0.000004490782,0.000010535424,0.0001897631,0.0000020602263,0.00012095114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965596,0.00007900134,0.00002326832,0.00013407243,0.00004961101,0.00005820462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934596,0.000089295034,0.0003238368,0.00006728539,0.00009167932,0.00008186378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048446792,0.00012441397,0.00026769456,0.00035216907,0.00040054,0.00037718387,0.00036888476,0.00023360513,0.0013370387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012212883,0.00017017248,0.00026025466,0.0004415578,0.00055928004,0.00030562445,0.0005344939,0.00025962837,0.00017247762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055332173,0.00002309238,0.9931272,0.000033658514,0.00006615059,0.0000937938,0.000827106,0.00006343139,0.0024283573,0.000053355478,0.00018406683,0.0030443612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.5298831e-7,0.000010851141,0.99971765,0.000002385899,0.000004324947,0.000019544743,0.00013280642,0.00002570015,0.000018073744,0.000007559592,0.000060077648,7.7919054e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024790538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05500648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024790538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003668427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032944183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049292445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391776760","doi":"10.1071/wr23041","title":"Seasonal nest use of sympatric North American flying squirrels","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Manitoba; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sympatric speciation; Nest (protein structural motif); Wildlife management; Ecology; Wildlife; Geography; Biodiversity; Wildlife conservation; Biology","score_opus":0.11750716713537246,"score_gpt":0.37885415342303924,"score_spread":0.2613469862876668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391776760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99974734,0.000027036494,0.000009001922,0.0000035593118,5.966871e-7,8.1861356e-7,0.000073700634,9.346463e-7,0.00013703408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995565,0.000027228301,0.000046099078,0.000010022944,0.000001133897,0.0000025218028,0.00021164483,6.972619e-7,0.00014401588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999244,0.000009830609,0.000005189208,0.000026268915,0.000014412255,0.000019861882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961686,0.00004095828,0.00014922679,0.000023867364,0.00006229865,0.000106770116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020520148,0.00013769086,0.0001427707,0.0004886143,0.0003832737,0.00022692456,0.00014119173,0.00015717692,0.0007806884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031555633,0.00013004831,0.0001233894,0.00024335743,0.00020923253,0.00018094493,0.0001623053,0.00012121677,0.00012166816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000855107,0.000020517069,0.99409807,0.000009233473,0.000025531153,0.00006799612,0.00040613106,0.000029492472,0.003495637,0.0000061387004,0.00008446959,0.0016712336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.211588e-7,0.000015899232,0.99976975,7.6528687e-7,0.000002651055,0.000030233197,0.000099783785,0.000017416305,0.000026611735,0.0000012501137,0.0000344784,5.8638824e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05400207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3258233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05400207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041979816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016455817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1073755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399349963","doi":"10.1071/wr23082","title":"Leopards at large: population density, habitat utilisation and spatio-temporal overlap of leopards (Panthera pardus) with competitors and prey in the Rajaji Tiger Reserve, northern India","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Panthera; Leopard; Tiger; Predation; Wildlife conservation; Population; Habitat; Wildlife management; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.02752629937162461,"score_gpt":0.2980428490669745,"score_spread":0.2705165496953499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399349963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996283,0.000046084322,0.000015063742,0.0000075131293,5.1368824e-7,0.0000016273186,0.000081166094,0.000001601518,0.00021806083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996123,0.00004847736,0.000049842827,0.0000046979167,0.0000014801328,0.0000039700835,0.00012464599,5.760157e-7,0.0001541889],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998554,0.000028774031,0.000010896931,0.000045588153,0.000024990326,0.000034344634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967504,0.00006886782,0.00014067043,0.000023609893,0.00003516881,0.00005668274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012568998,0.00012924007,0.00013010872,0.0007787688,0.00026675497,0.00048327885,0.00028030796,0.00019900792,0.0009870835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042071115,0.00012366373,0.00014308444,0.000708204,0.0003496259,0.00028667197,0.00034240162,0.0001858304,0.0002015442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034987712,0.000026110913,0.9954743,0.00001790088,0.000027823271,0.000211933,0.00071620906,0.00010576251,0.0010858547,0.000024078116,0.00008184892,0.002193131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.1167868e-7,0.000019454432,0.9988938,0.00000292545,0.0000038339767,0.000215674,0.00068023097,0.00007425568,0.000026857642,0.0000070325696,0.000073749594,0.0000017761087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014122613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041901905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014122613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029142923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017361034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028080821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403589979","doi":"10.1071/wr24027","title":"Spatiotemporal responses of ungulates to hunting in a fenced multi-use area","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.11882055972824747,"score_gpt":0.3764363112048725,"score_spread":0.257615751476625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403589979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995968,0.000033450502,0.000048638736,0.000005749478,5.9077297e-7,0.0000026111481,0.00013268608,0.0000016101368,0.00017796231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935657,0.000033400298,0.00013521935,0.000011064488,0.0000013954214,0.0000073057563,0.00028876576,0.0000014907629,0.00016481818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998235,0.000027660122,0.000009584285,0.0000625603,0.000026758917,0.000049962924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994728,0.00005795967,0.0002545257,0.000032662847,0.00007485625,0.00010730837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017708607,0.00013553268,0.00022701675,0.0006208787,0.00041186382,0.00037985176,0.00031436092,0.00017629894,0.0009209631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074990006,0.00011671817,0.00017742968,0.0005367535,0.00035935585,0.00018660064,0.00040342272,0.00020029666,0.0000806244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017778466,0.0000363427,0.99388367,0.000013816146,0.000048351474,0.000074307645,0.00050362165,0.00020583003,0.0026572843,0.000017834207,0.00007798165,0.0023030797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.9535523e-7,0.00001996931,0.9994727,0.0000019501074,0.0000035621435,0.000025508467,0.000259777,0.00013087559,0.00003373974,0.0000048285096,0.00004541954,0.0000012109497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14422764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43019688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14422764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079912855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040031673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28677624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404711839","doi":"10.1071/wr24063","title":"Influence of stand thinning on wildlife in managed second-growth forests: tree squirrels, small mustelids, and mammalian species richness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Wildlife; Ecology; Thinning; Biodiversity; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Biology; Agroforestry; Fauna; Geography","score_opus":0.03856821170470881,"score_gpt":0.2898496809709604,"score_spread":0.2512814692662516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404711839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996978,0.00006615567,0.000010443507,0.000008174711,9.4589814e-7,0.0000020466366,0.000048040267,7.351664e-7,0.00016562256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966264,0.00003291134,0.000045153294,0.000012279997,0.0000013112211,0.0000035159635,0.00009560375,5.038723e-7,0.0001460817],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999795,0.00004076145,0.000013242773,0.000046443638,0.000050015275,0.00005448786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906546,0.000102409744,0.00032534948,0.00003851233,0.0001373403,0.00033100133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004514892,0.00016771094,0.0001569409,0.00029170804,0.00062952965,0.00045871062,0.00026738693,0.00016542312,0.00074774184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007861651,0.000100563906,0.00012337763,0.0002584131,0.00048432645,0.00014803863,0.00021461541,0.00024024329,0.00006269608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018452345,0.00006621409,0.9956346,0.0000089622135,0.000028705488,0.000056405373,0.00013410457,0.00007874974,0.0020358055,0.000011761323,0.00006805805,0.0016921525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011349933,0.000026524844,0.9997627,0.0000014707642,0.0000035423636,0.000015040529,0.00007087877,0.000024657777,0.000050450988,0.0000027243386,0.00004025542,5.079181e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21195926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64230394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21195926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017496962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011733924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42145103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408082197","doi":"10.1071/wr24132","title":"Evidence for an ecological two-population model for white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in Australian waters","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Carcharias; White (mutation); Fishery; Wildlife management; Population; Geography; Ecology; Fauna; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Biology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.24708537243472908,"score_gpt":0.456880902545841,"score_spread":0.20979553011111193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408082197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98462003,0.00019144926,0.011330457,0.00079988403,0.000024488354,0.00007655915,0.00019318925,0.000056703524,0.0027072465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953406,0.00006375904,0.002580012,0.00017545033,0.000015513138,0.00004637038,0.00023073138,0.000013709648,0.0015337986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988716,0.00034815993,0.000060522245,0.0004818148,0.00010036572,0.00013746813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983169,0.00059614034,0.0003969744,0.00020451764,0.00029228543,0.00019312552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036876637,0.00045875373,0.0008282057,0.00096213416,0.001069516,0.0015182269,0.0021000097,0.0010755545,0.0049614706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066420757,0.0005673489,0.0013351878,0.0006217826,0.0016521008,0.0010998002,0.0011161711,0.0009790951,0.0006831914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005635956,0.00059245713,0.80202854,0.00035006463,0.0012467187,0.0024819204,0.011371771,0.07081738,0.011086363,0.04673301,0.0040377784,0.04869055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013352321,0.00030045648,0.59018797,0.0000449975,0.00029652307,0.0009886837,0.0017270474,0.37988806,0.00019220487,0.024048762,0.0020940246,0.00009784432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05182406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050426938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05182406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019436992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001111834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10304481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415943273","doi":"10.1071/wr25020","title":"Investigations into aerial shooting approaches to achieve rapid removal of feral and pest animals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife management; Wildlife; Pest control; Wildlife conservation; Aerial photography; Aerial survey; Integrated pest management; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.14207352698427836,"score_gpt":0.32909321585534,"score_spread":0.18701968887106166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415943273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904108,0.00083431957,0.0052651004,0.0001295529,0.0000108007025,0.0003257605,0.000049013826,0.000034030174,0.0029406347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97692466,0.0011845167,0.020293066,0.00011643295,0.000013208783,0.00016964143,0.000083196115,0.0000081158705,0.0012072339],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994537,0.00024832107,0.00003137673,0.00006815063,0.00011921997,0.00007916982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987172,0.00063439674,0.00032465725,0.00008709702,0.00013099123,0.000105757295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095051806,0.00029291867,0.00016224416,0.0003938323,0.00025283726,0.0003156198,0.0005246376,0.00025858366,0.0022244449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019512316,0.00008252218,0.00030808742,0.00020043422,0.00032042686,0.00033594228,0.00035898737,0.00027533344,0.00019544142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019677172,0.004245507,0.08876216,0.0038135315,0.0003421557,0.0007748395,0.0018956035,0.012742894,0.16493888,0.0009968373,0.00070987205,0.71881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061891973,0.11975308,0.71443623,0.001154876,0.0007007092,0.004348218,0.006347576,0.023304157,0.105022065,0.0011812183,0.02302255,0.000110381356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027843162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011813209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027843162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039665366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005615304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0074415207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116677567","doi":"10.1071/wr25057","title":"Did curiosity kill the cat? The impacts of aerial baiting and Felixer deployment on feral cat populations on Three Hummock Island, Tasmania","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; Biodiversity; Endangered species; Invasive species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Foraging","score_opus":0.0755863473843224,"score_gpt":0.43764586159644014,"score_spread":0.36205951421211774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116677567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99957436,0.000021079619,0.000056390854,0.000022298027,0.0000011054068,0.000006759623,0.00003150379,0.0000024898136,0.00028399474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932873,0.000032044314,0.00018885468,0.00002989968,0.0000010132899,0.000009038204,0.000056749035,9.665476e-7,0.0003525865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998227,0.0000353942,0.0000063678076,0.00004638162,0.000033071672,0.000056223875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995652,0.00006567309,0.0001609845,0.000020162064,0.000066359324,0.000121609635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035269756,0.00015776356,0.00013547247,0.00016046946,0.00036892272,0.00029375346,0.00032482395,0.00020841896,0.0009720673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075596804,0.00010001916,0.00017677598,0.00010345351,0.00045969922,0.00022959469,0.000387225,0.00026293632,0.000108894004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024681218,0.00021614441,0.96668,0.00006481569,0.00008334254,0.00060814165,0.002358389,0.0011671337,0.013279925,0.00011485147,0.00045995344,0.014720524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022593176,0.00034049415,0.9966949,0.000008360429,0.000017744083,0.00007895061,0.0011102536,0.00089351356,0.0005252738,0.000016436628,0.00030846833,0.000003399487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119583055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3359753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119583055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013384377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007661508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23777401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}