{"meta":{"query_hash":"9ec6b84e2c09","filters":{"venue":"Wildlife Research"},"cohort_total":160,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":160,"exported":160,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9ec6b84e2c09","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Wildlife+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1554781021","doi":"10.1071/wr14240","title":"Arctic ground squirrel population collapse in the boreal forests of the Southern Yukon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Parks Canada; Garfield Weston Foundation; Wildlife Conservation Society; Arctic Institute of North America","keywords":"Ecology; Predation; Taiga; Population; Herbivore; Habitat; Geography; Tundra; Occupancy; Arctic; Boreal; Context (archaeology); Biology","score_opus":0.0964816613140248,"score_gpt":0.33504695735291584,"score_spread":0.23856529603889104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554781021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891867,0.00030613193,0.0000012161627,0.0042246524,0.00012248592,0.00043612652,0.000016952581,0.0000065938107,0.0056991265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993309,0.000017467204,0.000017773122,0.0001464267,0.00007440988,0.000007634499,0.000050709255,0.000003029612,0.0003516827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959073,0.0020614262,0.00023490762,0.00021769165,0.0010128764,0.00056577916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813855,0.0010940348,0.0000526346,0.00043138384,0.00017730569,0.00010608069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055618268,0.000089406305,0.00015507225,0.00017921775,0.00026604626,0.000039093302,0.0007797389,0.00014730888,0.00012605215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094159244,0.000047899546,0.000051027393,0.0009444798,0.0006519498,0.00009685054,0.00005619138,0.0006740184,0.0002758333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014263694,0.000031039483,0.9962124,0.000024021425,0.0000068533604,0.000014128093,0.0017248784,0.0003339385,1.9067596e-7,0.0003861106,0.00082389073,0.00029989477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039651254,0.00012998554,0.98572296,0.000021915514,0.0000031823884,0.00003965315,0.0021117725,0.0019113525,7.155137e-7,0.009357781,0.0002518898,0.000052280233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023331465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09337205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07004058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062457693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022080282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98317224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602821691","doi":"10.1071/wr15001","title":"The temporal multimodal influence of optical and auditory cues on the repellent behavior of ring-billed gulls (Larus delewarensis)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bayer Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sensory cue; Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0997266170187767,"score_gpt":0.33716305209585884,"score_spread":0.23743643507708212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602821691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966609,0.00022048163,1.4019628e-7,0.0025196718,0.00007419264,0.00035734003,0.0000075072403,0.000012172699,0.00014763525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993861,0.00014590564,0.000021802047,0.000017212105,0.00020745244,0.000032403877,0.0000026321827,0.0000011897941,0.0001853118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981574,0.0002825021,0.00025066332,0.00026947132,0.00077630545,0.00026367916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986086,0.0005756044,0.000074643336,0.00015447798,0.0004696117,0.00011710277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021359206,0.00008887329,0.00014321026,0.000016383961,0.0003096384,0.000031530442,0.0002854097,0.000083322964,0.0000131572915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007624623,0.000024069583,0.00005621375,0.00023338897,0.0008403192,0.000057401066,0.00018771783,0.00029105914,0.000010471117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008757615,0.00073873217,0.5777319,0.000019652738,0.00003104605,0.000014391789,0.00070710777,0.00006476412,0.36169174,0.0013403592,0.0057810782,0.05100345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001652944,0.0011856311,0.9819543,0.000039478633,0.0000129907685,0.000008476164,0.0019423446,0.000038256487,0.009845351,0.000120061755,0.004593771,0.00009409511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008346829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012341715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40422234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002548962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035145797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3096191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901937181","doi":"10.1071/wr15038","title":"Performance of GPS collars on free-ranging bison (Bison bison) in north-western Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"Panthera","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Wildlife; Collar; Geography; Demography; Biology; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.058278633993834046,"score_gpt":0.29143144502169405,"score_spread":0.23315281102786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901937181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99283504,0.000031532287,0.0000025991565,0.0033079125,0.00015515118,0.0003395812,0.000012138347,0.00001549593,0.0033005213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979786,0.00003565489,0.000073247036,0.00074977044,0.000049238766,0.000045360837,0.000011862491,0.000017569802,0.0010386957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971044,0.0003277996,0.00033323973,0.00036725742,0.0012147785,0.0006525345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989007,0.00025390188,0.00008184123,0.0004897483,0.000060323473,0.00021349761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016953899,0.00014401575,0.00022116216,0.00018721886,0.00016726018,0.000018431314,0.0005982988,0.000118925695,0.00013146481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042514259,0.00014110448,0.000026607191,0.0012254678,0.0002512411,0.00025006576,0.00031592362,0.0004739338,0.0001878057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014691823,0.000084139065,0.9672865,0.000017818278,0.000005758648,0.00002056137,0.00033677786,0.0035826308,0.000028724196,0.000011555522,0.027137779,0.0013407905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007078004,0.00031755725,0.9841353,0.000045504516,0.0000026039827,0.0000032823816,0.0002788272,0.0043881997,0.00010348048,0.000020663043,0.0098501155,0.00014660756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25070494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8361483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5854434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008668904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051745033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7542847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965622485","doi":"10.1071/wr11051","title":"Harbouring pests: rabbit warrens in agricultural landscapes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Agriculture; Geography; Agroforestry; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.10096265794183498,"score_gpt":0.31192155921725034,"score_spread":0.21095890127541536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965622485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830229,0.00047568505,2.923724e-7,0.008230316,0.00015651365,0.0004101425,0.000016293841,0.00010432575,0.0075835055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974472,0.00050147146,0.000097167336,0.000081790364,0.0010563051,0.00007483977,0.00005134601,0.0000021385058,0.00068773783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970974,0.00043047805,0.00034714158,0.0005978022,0.0006781038,0.00084911694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990617,0.0002118071,0.00005628794,0.00014339712,0.0002843033,0.000242483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017826225,0.00015415315,0.0002189601,0.00008503006,0.00042120885,0.000080803875,0.00044419742,0.00013628972,0.0006012462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033202628,0.000060775725,0.00007549735,0.0013297995,0.000109867906,0.0002911116,0.00012368878,0.00054947106,0.00025764533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018264269,0.0009332725,0.9229612,0.00012475949,0.000022646656,0.000051403174,0.0017873122,0.000004471913,0.015512147,0.0035764056,0.028395923,0.026447818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022334508,0.00020996935,0.98250085,0.00009321348,0.0000018573448,0.000029778936,0.001911922,0.000016919557,0.0011933694,0.0013261616,0.012306222,0.00018641629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034842575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067751096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059539627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017711915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032853954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65832245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973067932","doi":"10.1071/wr13090","title":"Evaluation of predator-exclusion cages used in turtle conservation: cost analysis and effects on nest environment and proxies of hatchling fitness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Hatchling; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Turtle (robot); Predation; Ecology; Chelydra; Predator; Context (archaeology); Nest box; Painted turtle; Hatching; Zoology; Fishery","score_opus":0.05873463479451411,"score_gpt":0.3301222129980049,"score_spread":0.2713875782034908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973067932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977884,0.000110242116,0.000032158536,0.0011304676,0.00001035708,0.0008231765,0.000003078517,0.00000381686,0.00009825912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953073,0.000093081355,0.00011015362,0.000050500897,0.000007773136,0.0001335418,0.000013464228,0.000003837168,0.00005689662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981329,0.0006120376,0.0001914442,0.00023685349,0.00068129005,0.00014551275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991798,0.00048267422,0.00007374518,0.00017336688,0.00004688526,0.00004356699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025406545,0.00007175096,0.00015818543,0.00014806926,0.00008403919,0.0000128338415,0.00007946399,0.00008301275,0.0002007305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027176892,0.00006070194,0.000016956095,0.00038071844,0.00034802835,0.00015780513,0.00013807493,0.00010732587,0.000011599152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024250496,0.000051911404,0.97385013,0.000028608232,0.000024742256,3.1407254e-7,0.00046362664,0.00046190887,0.012955163,0.000021124071,0.00009112727,0.012027109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004397532,0.00010815087,0.97556627,0.0000383734,0.00004352457,3.3002829e-7,0.00015077516,0.016124383,0.006919198,0.0005006683,0.000054208936,0.000054377735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019901462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005282539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015662475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009130416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023672535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30085188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973828764","doi":"10.1071/wr10173","title":"Does ‘acoustic anchoring’ reduce post-translocation dispersal of North Island robins?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Context (archaeology); Population; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.07863541845144163,"score_gpt":0.35330425016911227,"score_spread":0.27466883171767065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973828764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99755245,0.00017551219,0.00044725472,0.00020398163,0.000049112412,0.00019257999,0.000029204657,0.000009151789,0.001340755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824566,0.0004900988,0.00027693782,0.00006262295,0.000114497845,0.000025060017,0.00009423316,0.000016320513,0.0006745964],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893725,0.00015288558,0.00018722829,0.00023175329,0.00024694693,0.00024394649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989627,0.000018940782,0.00004088834,0.0004923961,0.0003894969,0.00009556374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003548998,0.0000874811,0.0001013498,0.00006954263,0.000106792955,0.000011208719,0.0003796991,0.00008457236,0.0000697939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001319531,0.00006064892,0.00005567767,0.0001654569,0.00024308027,0.0000064070164,0.00013509198,0.0001931372,0.000021541366],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005684406,0.00055718276,0.15123597,0.00006636483,0.00004559121,0.0000034064612,0.00079958374,0.000007130586,0.8327549,0.00020083645,0.0021356242,0.0116249425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009787811,0.0017204395,0.73283243,0.00008606923,0.000037767073,0.000008485645,0.0011427313,0.00011674416,0.24676953,0.000039478415,0.01582752,0.00044000044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034895053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014643946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58598536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012956213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011384645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24731912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978697009","doi":"10.1071/wr07035","title":"The importance of grasstrees (Xanthorrhoea preissii) as habitat for mardo (Antechinus flavipes leucogaster) during post-fire recovery","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Murdoch University","keywords":"Biology; Snag; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Fauna; Habitat; Foraging; Prescribed burn; Wildlife conservation","score_opus":0.023484372285250226,"score_gpt":0.31803159838314016,"score_spread":0.2945472260978899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978697009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914155,0.00024919122,0.00017380375,0.0047106403,0.00016937114,0.00076345704,0.000017662942,0.000036570156,0.0024637766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952913,0.00019297365,0.00066122465,0.00047933435,0.00012152264,0.00009867039,0.000010539435,0.000027955186,0.0031165069],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736387,0.0001946757,0.00047783583,0.00044135712,0.0006712948,0.0008509625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747056,0.0015923742,0.00016069408,0.0005193196,0.00010848548,0.00014856996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039716708,0.00016453897,0.00019751255,0.00008581503,0.0009194072,0.000053002703,0.00063781126,0.00016826845,0.00015642456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014130851,0.00012731837,0.00012283241,0.0004380558,0.0007488955,0.00032816106,0.00034664103,0.00038819833,0.00016516668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092679565,0.0000793269,0.97291756,0.000036733254,0.000031438052,0.000018304272,0.00016279264,0.000042602784,0.0036360756,0.00016828644,0.0066616707,0.015318443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042451255,0.00039943904,0.98788506,0.00006301509,0.000009339705,0.000026883406,0.00066708494,0.000119326156,0.0016352232,0.0029221263,0.005693985,0.00015400669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029722095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025312535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015164437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020858596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090497546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70714295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979437213","doi":"10.1071/wr08165","title":"Shedding new light on old species identifications: morphological and genetic evidence suggest a need for conservation status review of the critically endangered bat, Saccolaimus saccolaimus","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Endangered species; Critically endangered; Biology; Biodiversity; Conservation status; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Ecology; Species complex; Conservation genetics; Microsatellite","score_opus":0.11569465486856283,"score_gpt":0.35082205434971225,"score_spread":0.2351273994811494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979437213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7764125,0.017105255,0.0000060927796,0.20481005,0.00010513441,0.0012612799,0.00004001055,0.000026965477,0.00023274356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535631,0.034641817,0.00028770362,0.010370329,0.0002447034,0.00012548045,0.000016535776,0.0000015215431,0.0007488373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791807,0.0004304656,0.00039223648,0.00041870965,0.00032172797,0.0005188113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609256,0.0030940934,0.00009699672,0.00015485802,0.00043605734,0.00012542785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011941774,0.00014212463,0.00030616892,0.00003166676,0.0006891657,0.0000556588,0.00039048886,0.00015986682,0.00014988349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068459823,0.00005440241,0.00009785914,0.0005599922,0.00043514886,0.00009983138,0.00013198087,0.00028668955,0.000013447486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067680643,0.00060711906,0.28799313,0.0008100437,0.00011063372,0.000022298416,0.00037446964,0.000002123143,0.30159363,0.009881012,0.33933294,0.058595795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015609077,0.0008027997,0.9740532,0.001094025,0.000024569903,0.0000123539585,0.00019862052,0.000013025159,0.00061753177,0.001680621,0.021229664,0.00011751682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121180725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033063182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6860601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052545678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056041525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8195775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981176202","doi":"10.1071/wr14223","title":"Anthropogenic stressors influence small mammal communities in tropical East African savanna at multiple spatial scales","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Zoologische Gesellschaft Frankfurt","keywords":"Ecosystem; Ecology; Species richness; Habitat; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem health; Ecosystem diversity; Context (archaeology); Biology","score_opus":0.09792184551721872,"score_gpt":0.31701427753928524,"score_spread":0.21909243202206652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981176202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949768,0.000051134768,0.000037304668,0.002979083,0.00007681758,0.00033692562,0.000018370136,0.000041334173,0.0014822223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987628,0.000036589016,0.0002564683,0.00031955168,0.000073915835,0.00008067576,0.00002563122,0.000018892393,0.0004255031],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967125,0.0010697538,0.0003296575,0.00033889333,0.00075907406,0.0007901056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858546,0.0005000103,0.00005792214,0.00047855036,0.00005994962,0.0003181172],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011580267,0.00016684706,0.00021507438,0.00015303309,0.00042520606,0.000046991598,0.00065485394,0.00017995815,0.00053696195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066928216,0.00016093065,0.000046657373,0.00050767855,0.0020314802,0.0002541476,0.0010291737,0.00065249763,0.0011258571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003009602,0.00017902617,0.99239874,0.000006712916,0.000007002883,0.000029692488,0.0016570075,0.0015998514,0.00006535862,0.000045918023,0.0021827775,0.001526938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008568775,0.00021558112,0.9838569,0.000021356855,0.0000026132245,0.000010016254,0.0029796907,0.004297562,0.000032141477,0.00022674569,0.007325222,0.00017527014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018111873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18784763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16973576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006486119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009397642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982099321","doi":"10.1071/wr07167","title":"A bait-suspension device for the control of feral cats","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Feral cat; Invasive species; Introduced species; Biology; Ecology; Pest control; Wildlife conservation; Fauna; Habitat; Predation; Felis catus","score_opus":0.12786144224795667,"score_gpt":0.4505916087037491,"score_spread":0.32273016645579244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982099321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99307716,0.0016822307,0.0007308262,0.0025497393,0.000095109826,0.0005663529,0.000022884902,0.0000065743034,0.0012691008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964668,0.0003852647,0.0001032947,0.00046127234,0.00029812774,0.00009758515,0.0000090134845,0.000013891445,0.002164754],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989669,0.00012267387,0.00016420595,0.00020524266,0.00027592128,0.0002650563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873686,0.00028391168,0.000040690746,0.00027227128,0.00061998033,0.00004630305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005736659,0.00007603078,0.00012577974,0.00004390392,0.00034065603,0.0000102151425,0.00020207753,0.00006407963,0.00002643271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000636918,0.000052319294,0.00008784222,0.00008833081,0.00026246283,0.000002919706,0.00012064474,0.00014054579,0.000025754822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012688682,0.00014497052,0.012542279,0.000045591598,0.0002968079,0.0000066044126,0.000414311,0.000046539153,0.7757765,0.00035956228,0.20802557,0.00107237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023080024,0.0013760453,0.03824409,0.000037834656,0.00003007783,0.00006256633,0.0008798286,0.00074686407,0.11285433,0.0000704345,0.8431576,0.00023235838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010303825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010918237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6629222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015572492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009434207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26200852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983861488","doi":"10.1071/wr06140","title":"Increasing the target-specificity of ERADICAT® for feral cat (Felis catus) control by encapsulating a toxicant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Toxicant; Pellet; Biology; Felis catus; Feral cat; Toxicology; CATS; Felis; Zoology; Animal science; Ecology; Veterinary medicine; Predation; Toxicity; Chemistry; Medicine","score_opus":0.03154881625757824,"score_gpt":0.3585682800367027,"score_spread":0.3270194637791245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983861488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928146,0.0007164834,0.00294992,0.0014905568,0.000065242086,0.0010017756,0.00031899032,0.000011982456,0.00063047284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676967,0.00009676113,0.0017309724,0.00023500413,0.00051814644,0.00006609832,0.00020184889,0.000044473265,0.00033701587],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964449,0.00056164264,0.0004768429,0.00054419035,0.0008235591,0.0011488743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973805,0.00089578173,0.000118938726,0.00068288395,0.0006426949,0.00027922192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067111487,0.00019822104,0.00029307482,0.00016203274,0.0004546265,0.00007846585,0.00071677426,0.00023810792,0.000040669205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017801855,0.0001559125,0.00015785656,0.00040317848,0.00057489413,0.00001065744,0.00022745602,0.00041322073,0.000009487364],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012278685,0.00013232982,0.052004885,0.00004535341,0.00008065959,0.000003884704,0.00014799129,0.000012529218,0.93345743,0.000080194804,0.011560382,0.0012464846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004526106,0.0016919863,0.10730986,0.00011465451,0.00003725844,0.00019483383,0.0012172695,0.0031860603,0.75147927,0.00019837565,0.12924355,0.0008007882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080371334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000086688975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1819782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011924677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035985748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63579273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985521129","doi":"10.1071/wr05031","title":"Summer survey of dugong distribution and abundance in Shark Bay reveals additional key habitat area","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Geography; Population; Habitat; Fishery; Abundance (ecology); Reef; Wildlife management; Aerial survey; Ecology; Oceanography; Biology; Geology; Demography","score_opus":0.0746871981669621,"score_gpt":0.3246499834559679,"score_spread":0.2499627852890058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985521129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875067,0.0003032916,0.000014910602,0.00041992878,0.0000136679555,0.00026283905,0.0014995597,0.0000081872695,0.009970916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998329,0.00023666598,0.000100971985,0.000058723337,0.000025720381,0.00004880313,0.0005978117,0.000008810947,0.00059352565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977985,0.0003672942,0.000290703,0.00034404,0.0007740312,0.00042541238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998881,0.00074178114,0.000056269164,0.00018270762,0.0000632257,0.000075024356],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022495778,0.000103555205,0.0001990013,0.00004187041,0.000143382,0.000025114692,0.0001994342,0.000053664306,0.0035757946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007954628,0.00009696948,0.000026626265,0.0006947265,0.00049777015,0.0001647889,0.00052714586,0.00022718881,0.00014929939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028487493,0.00007383976,0.8042411,0.000022476259,0.0000030324957,0.000004568801,0.000009644066,0.000017583252,0.000054633976,0.00014852193,0.19473387,0.00066219555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001897888,0.000059281185,0.97249675,0.000058314672,0.0000011318779,0.000001790855,0.000010649804,0.00015416785,0.00001447729,0.0003711673,0.026550163,0.000092293085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031240955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072498426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16825564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023935034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020361646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990305143","doi":"10.1071/wr09070","title":"Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fraser Health","funders":"University of Otago; Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation","keywords":"Threatened species; Feral cat; Geography; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Rural area; Protected area; Population; Endangered species; Ecology; Habitat; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.02941831063923507,"score_gpt":0.30557230043170674,"score_spread":0.2761539897924717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990305143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638139,0.00001725194,0.000015680547,0.0330006,0.00009613633,0.00037469505,0.0000075214634,0.000025284366,0.0026489282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99459326,0.000036868216,0.00030435424,0.0018532247,0.00011036184,0.00007800226,0.000009408609,0.000014603894,0.002999906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821293,0.00017030376,0.00014168341,0.00034530816,0.00050012453,0.0006296244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992143,0.000215715,0.000026897997,0.00030693694,0.000023639739,0.00021253813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017927793,0.00012327303,0.00014256862,0.00015298316,0.000363491,0.00008637723,0.00031380617,0.00028482545,0.0005094833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042060085,0.000107386535,0.000024500532,0.00022340928,0.00014189494,0.00023440983,0.0006708253,0.00084064726,0.00029648124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004695721,0.00008601402,0.97357017,0.000005967045,0.0000029832163,0.000012133699,0.0020839702,0.0000050455615,0.0013373406,0.00045582154,0.020914322,0.0014793004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042417244,0.00010165383,0.9278461,0.00001453824,0.000001915981,0.000007533005,0.000993674,0.0010867288,0.000037604357,0.00039678017,0.06894687,0.00014247515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011647631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03130991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04803255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008048254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029925961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98636615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990333528","doi":"10.1071/wr09111","title":"Detecting, but not affecting, nest-box occupancy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Murdoch University","keywords":"Nest box; Nest (protein structural motif); Occupancy; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Brushtail possum; Biology; Environmental science; Predation","score_opus":0.04066627592238788,"score_gpt":0.3319678287490373,"score_spread":0.29130155282664943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990333528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747333,0.000007264152,0.000051917046,0.0026880465,0.00048055602,0.00035522523,0.0000026993264,0.00011642915,0.021564553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928572,0.000008790558,0.0007545753,0.0013208005,0.00034100813,0.00007280763,0.0000035679798,0.000026196505,0.0046150335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972893,0.00032653005,0.00023740368,0.0005461377,0.0007727639,0.0008278549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983642,0.00069511525,0.00007057136,0.0005796319,0.000047990616,0.00024246225],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029219026,0.00015912011,0.00015999156,0.000119442164,0.0008499384,0.000079579564,0.0005632761,0.00026692735,0.004245583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018172581,0.00015184215,0.00006861601,0.00063198473,0.0005894625,0.00031185697,0.00034573034,0.0015110238,0.0062927934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042038355,0.0000790341,0.95358646,0.0000070443116,0.0000070391834,0.000019721634,0.00020124584,0.000008633761,0.016428262,0.00019360795,0.019789778,0.009637134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032560527,0.00013155804,0.9568974,0.000009041145,0.000005016455,0.00003721434,0.0001506819,0.00030738514,0.0036926996,0.0006134147,0.03762404,0.00020599521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001368482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002212329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01812391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010256059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007330103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99666464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992331963","doi":"10.1071/wr11106","title":"Choosing cost-effective locations for conservation fences in the local landscape","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Australian Government","keywords":"Exclosure; Fence (mathematics); Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Wildlife management; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Wildlife; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.32879011042366046,"score_gpt":0.3606483256875823,"score_spread":0.03185821526392185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992331963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540311,0.0016902608,0.02290502,0.008043675,0.00020840122,0.0027475276,0.000051550698,0.000012106322,0.010310356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974518,0.000112981266,0.0001876496,0.000622276,0.00016553974,0.001256264,0.00004486823,0.000009275957,0.000149346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990934,0.00008641972,0.00025189578,0.00017483236,0.000055710934,0.00033774803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912727,0.00058007345,0.000067285524,0.00016329903,0.000017042415,0.000045004363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004275746,0.000061681676,0.00011846142,0.00016257988,0.00021111534,0.000053644446,0.00015781003,0.000059310976,0.00010006693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020283589,0.00005694496,0.000036712365,0.00020793709,0.00012134528,0.00033718706,0.000028677578,0.00016108145,0.00044803167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010239248,0.000085521344,0.9313983,0.000011757166,0.000007699178,7.287175e-8,0.0010626067,0.00024244998,0.0000021671212,0.05805658,0.0048179594,0.004304669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004201552,0.000050132334,0.9248492,0.000010594152,0.0000016996742,0.0000014936762,0.001971134,0.011674497,0.000012115495,0.0070214607,0.05389975,0.0000877632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000077766774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05103512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019566396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001628288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.575869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993548293","doi":"10.1071/wr03105","title":"The contribution of spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus) to the transmission of Echinococcus granulosus in the Byadbo Wilderness Area, Kosciuszko National Park, Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Parasitic infections in humans and animals","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; University of Salford Manchester","keywords":"Echinococcus granulosus; Biology; Wildlife; Zoology; Ecology; Animal ecology; Fauna","score_opus":0.11010987442233816,"score_gpt":0.439760091707996,"score_spread":0.32965021728565785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993548293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98197836,0.00032128475,0.00024798897,0.014051528,0.00006712733,0.0014296799,0.000041054944,0.000012464393,0.0018505165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984086,0.00018261062,0.000084499145,0.00024122011,0.00026724153,0.00013458823,0.000024823916,0.000012539193,0.0006438675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963746,0.00064892817,0.0005905033,0.00025987782,0.0016018788,0.00052423094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974684,0.0011117001,0.00010200309,0.00043827578,0.0007731308,0.00010645415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005601919,0.00015474502,0.00030080546,0.0002760722,0.00049667957,0.000045882596,0.0004430436,0.00012822612,0.00013155724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007768545,0.00007579416,0.00015879536,0.0010324682,0.00043460887,0.00007497836,0.00004572766,0.0006822512,0.0000385428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005501931,0.0040151,0.70224714,0.00034426025,0.0005788196,0.00009707363,0.0102943145,0.004048954,0.037525643,0.07854131,0.10443301,0.052372422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037393584,0.0007662532,0.81379205,0.000703296,0.000088159315,0.00010886998,0.0013044429,0.0035234313,0.0024620648,0.002274934,0.17098962,0.00024753573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004271628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032719522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11154487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017082308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026975272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3820108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994123841","doi":"10.1071/wr11105","title":"Assessment of bias in US waterfowl harvest estimates","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Goose; Branta; Geography; Context (archaeology); Anatidae; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Archaeology","score_opus":0.4965470248049577,"score_gpt":0.5373102824956577,"score_spread":0.040763257690699994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994123841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98969835,0.00007340335,0.004332013,0.00023988912,0.000057062636,0.00030662812,0.0000089913665,0.000115820054,0.005167819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92117876,0.00003170419,0.07838404,0.000019384619,0.000059310456,0.00006994104,0.000010458952,0.000024666875,0.00022171189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976752,0.00048020936,0.00041192418,0.0001603456,0.0007113149,0.0005610304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963273,0.0028466114,0.00007445231,0.00040372004,0.00022469547,0.00012324528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009859075,0.00011121624,0.00027003765,0.00043030301,0.00007662933,0.00003974892,0.00024259932,0.000099211175,0.000114914605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003447335,0.000091709175,0.000046296886,0.00046164013,0.00013669189,0.00021801048,0.00013688677,0.00036859539,0.000038635655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075159924,0.00037036085,0.9782779,0.00021014328,0.0000123600485,0.0000015866389,0.00030666866,0.00001530496,0.00038951717,0.015300201,0.0040395544,0.0010688949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035837106,0.0001322351,0.9495958,0.00038188387,0.000007482669,0.000007760479,0.00017452071,0.0037694655,0.007220076,0.03637221,0.0017695208,0.00021067864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005466916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003296821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07405203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010603772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009779554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4127031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996414013","doi":"10.1071/wr05021","title":"Estimating the abundance of eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) in south-eastern New South Wales, Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Transect; Aerial survey; Abundance (ecology); Population; Wildlife management; Population density; Wildlife; Forestry; Fishery; Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.06708750562672058,"score_gpt":0.3245256465723542,"score_spread":0.25743814094563366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996414013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995538,0.00005263806,0.0005348519,0.0020621049,0.00012215404,0.00041577456,0.0000109880475,0.000024910674,0.0012385625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852044,0.0000011700625,0.00073974783,0.00017142027,0.00020542074,0.000029063225,0.000009331649,0.000019879553,0.013619577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972395,0.00031517324,0.00047634004,0.000443772,0.0008144651,0.0007108054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897426,0.00023043042,0.00015795704,0.00048601054,0.00003848884,0.00011283156],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014629491,0.00017405067,0.00021766845,0.00010632664,0.00026115353,0.00008625651,0.0007156655,0.0001438013,0.0005554104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002764045,0.00013871242,0.0000649514,0.00073657336,0.00067430374,0.0002904075,0.00035252637,0.0006127195,0.0016887352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047233287,0.00006057041,0.989291,0.000016977363,0.0000065747067,0.000015587822,0.0017677717,0.0028494366,0.00012493743,0.000097562166,0.0040460746,0.0016762789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005547292,0.00007119379,0.9809204,0.00008830327,0.0000057655366,0.000007553572,0.00047336755,0.014737612,0.000042191117,0.0016485379,0.001286341,0.0001640337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076886625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026242465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123810135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001354806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008574762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996699596","doi":"10.1071/wr05057","title":"Home range and den characteristics of the brush-tailed rabbit-rat (Conilurus penicillatus) in the monsoonal tropics of the Northern Territory, Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Home range; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Ecology; Tropics; Geography; Floristics; Diameter at breast height; Forestry; Species richness","score_opus":0.032957787635656974,"score_gpt":0.2794786409986995,"score_spread":0.24652085336304252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996699596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99388754,0.00003919283,0.0000012426127,0.005038711,0.00011698377,0.00046378118,0.00001808309,0.000003655657,0.0004308005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860156,0.000017463452,0.000014254141,0.00021160656,0.00008789191,0.00002906496,0.0000029847463,0.000008273822,0.0010269255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772686,0.0007196668,0.00033178204,0.00020840937,0.0006889833,0.00032429927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900883,0.00034033225,0.00012984176,0.00045567716,0.00003404947,0.000031279393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011793706,0.000107507185,0.0001714947,0.0000394021,0.00025859952,0.00002441919,0.000697646,0.00012110518,0.00013230798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014212604,0.00005814407,0.00006793489,0.0003903855,0.0011419768,0.0000878942,0.0002941727,0.00045847983,0.000026179787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043409436,0.0000735777,0.9962886,0.000011983984,0.00000651244,0.0000023234459,0.0003095338,0.000030256555,0.00051734544,0.00015871089,0.002302889,0.00025487941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036894705,0.000042504893,0.9958152,0.000021777929,0.0000100771,0.0000064229753,0.000117960175,0.00012850043,0.000046654422,0.0005757437,0.0028011373,0.00006506898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042548003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011726853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007472053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097786666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006204291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.654386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997809727","doi":"10.1071/wr04089","title":"Factors affecting the detection of possums by spotlighting in Western Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Geography; Brushtail possum; Aerial survey; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Forestry; Vegetation (pathology); Eucalyptus; Physical geography; Biology; Marsupial; Cartography","score_opus":0.08095376978242817,"score_gpt":0.3499750825913329,"score_spread":0.26902131280890473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997809727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99764127,0.000018949688,0.000031393516,0.0015933346,0.00004614951,0.0002224792,0.0000013937732,0.000014895016,0.0004301555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879295,0.0000064620813,0.000017814236,0.00010708268,0.00005165219,0.000011938338,0.0000020022035,0.000008270835,0.0010018245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844575,0.0003504106,0.00021479324,0.00021206037,0.00040670784,0.00037027962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924546,0.00044938293,0.00006209528,0.00018188637,0.000013316421,0.000047879035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018488804,0.00008133141,0.00010078925,0.00006711671,0.00022782703,0.000019465271,0.00024830605,0.000098709526,0.000251706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023477817,0.00005858685,0.000030916082,0.0005046568,0.00023922852,0.00023283774,0.00013180386,0.0004238174,0.00021801349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117452855,0.00004382565,0.9873701,0.0000039043457,0.000003461533,6.0713626e-7,0.00084878807,0.00018922202,0.007838764,0.0000044810945,0.00080247497,0.002882678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013985756,0.000053065167,0.98996687,0.0000124653225,0.0000017894334,0.0000013761796,0.00048227218,0.00027060986,0.005387313,0.00003140558,0.003590665,0.00006233926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001906673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042471327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028203388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018568823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010465827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2882332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999098784","doi":"10.1071/wr07071","title":"Effects of drought on weight, survival and breeding success of agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis), dusky antechinus (A. swainsonii) and bush rats (Rattus fuscipes)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Seasonal breeder","score_opus":0.019472867929869398,"score_gpt":0.2964306213737513,"score_spread":0.2769577534438819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999098784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928515,0.00037583275,0.00033804594,0.00069599086,0.00024438844,0.00072101405,0.000018184974,0.00005346789,0.004701563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984149,0.0005091142,0.00035106967,0.00016958965,0.00011234953,0.00001942048,0.000006959602,0.000034174984,0.0003824639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996077,0.00047656943,0.0006191078,0.0007550608,0.0011849389,0.000887336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670416,0.002231338,0.0002359608,0.000441287,0.000096814096,0.00029042113],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004608683,0.00031162795,0.0005514628,0.00041610302,0.00050869625,0.00004649436,0.00051512383,0.00034048103,0.00009662642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066521304,0.0002828658,0.000079442536,0.001096699,0.0017367925,0.00041883014,0.0006118498,0.0008436375,0.000031008858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005199827,0.00034751176,0.94372886,0.0002671002,0.000057895955,0.00014589542,0.00060064124,0.000016342847,0.041442312,0.0011662511,0.0014027276,0.010304494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013731366,0.00093357253,0.954046,0.00027297373,0.000027861097,0.000042834115,0.0002599705,0.0004048828,0.040270247,0.0010933164,0.00094336306,0.00033184802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001256531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007839487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010317149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014539379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006233607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999129668","doi":"10.1071/wr12184","title":"Spatial relationships of sympatric wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (C. latrans) with woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) during the calving season in a human-modified boreal landscape","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Canis; Predation; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Population; Ursus; Bog; Context (archaeology); Boreal; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.026123599569093676,"score_gpt":0.26140295979494055,"score_spread":0.23527936022584686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999129668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99616784,0.00013179972,0.000039558447,0.0016150821,0.00002656455,0.0006971768,0.00001624712,0.000019873387,0.0012858505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937904,0.000057373334,0.0000508385,0.000053068834,0.000051570416,0.00013352315,0.000024712119,0.000017573775,0.0002323216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977822,0.00051928445,0.00028152784,0.00035609127,0.00056520145,0.000495708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885166,0.00062037044,0.00007160577,0.00028511393,0.000050697912,0.000120564575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00113699,0.00015274165,0.00021772513,0.00015772854,0.00065355445,0.00007057266,0.00024872474,0.00016924465,0.0002624392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015504143,0.00010784808,0.000033429205,0.0006478687,0.00056054466,0.00030389355,0.00013701571,0.00068316725,0.000018075989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009102267,0.000051577772,0.9964923,0.000030283238,0.000020088934,0.0000063543343,0.0014478479,0.00071758893,0.00025861766,0.000098048135,0.000502873,0.00028334904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001068804,0.000112352696,0.9949082,0.000046415986,0.000014393615,0.000012027879,0.0006347738,0.0027268778,0.00003810005,0.0002535766,0.000052121213,0.00013236623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040900752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033677816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072229365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108352004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005634455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.983955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999418935","doi":"10.1071/wr05024","title":"Comparison of the healing process in hot and cold brands applied to harbour seal pups (Phoca vitulina)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Meat and Animal Product Quality","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Phoca; Cold war; Seal (emblem); Biology; Fishery; Geography","score_opus":0.11844878223096522,"score_gpt":0.38899520936735327,"score_spread":0.27054642713638805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999418935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919359,0.00012414325,4.2167744e-7,0.0064644846,0.000020065334,0.00042223604,0.000012309282,0.000012441012,0.0010080057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946576,0.0000067340416,0.000015529635,0.00013424372,0.00021839295,0.00002427977,0.000005297763,9.989182e-7,0.00012873455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983177,0.00018997038,0.00025184834,0.0002989008,0.00056702865,0.00037451845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995207,0.00019776712,0.00004394299,0.000071190225,0.000078479876,0.000087910885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017123382,0.0000847587,0.00021509393,0.000023934976,0.0002431397,0.00005744071,0.00029543825,0.000066758614,0.000020909776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009276039,0.000030706036,0.000028559782,0.0008423889,0.0001352366,0.000041015872,0.00014069551,0.00028254816,0.0000052167516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004020112,0.00030772376,0.54370666,0.00010314538,0.0000037250854,0.0000010407098,0.0004657286,0.00007214693,0.4464899,0.0028799505,0.0028265968,0.0027414027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025804856,0.00027879354,0.9560268,0.000064084685,0.000001938148,6.71141e-7,0.0009908873,0.00012309475,0.035956576,0.00058144645,0.005583766,0.00013389954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006885304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025377437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41232017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021699829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022547454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18700585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000661016","doi":"10.1071/wr04094","title":"A comparison of survey methods for arboreal possums in jarrah forest, Western Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Eucalyptus; Brushtail possum; Biology; Ecology; Marsupial; Habitat","score_opus":0.29619080126970293,"score_gpt":0.5269645016899436,"score_spread":0.23077370042024065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000661016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99516195,0.00002613124,0.0018373159,0.0017653494,0.00005282383,0.0005576637,0.000013881187,0.000012022531,0.00057283597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98664325,0.0000071197132,0.011565889,0.0001676361,0.0000571043,0.00010622174,0.0000324022,0.00001288075,0.001407466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735296,0.0009905173,0.00042263453,0.0003312428,0.00035550352,0.000547146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813336,0.0013367154,0.00008403106,0.00028739657,0.000049299768,0.00010918519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062350775,0.00010905603,0.0002770374,0.00013519966,0.000112997055,0.00001834867,0.00039408417,0.00016748164,0.00027478344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006733863,0.00010581787,0.000049491682,0.0005438916,0.0003761041,0.00019479575,0.00017045751,0.0003410674,0.00015974605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015744922,0.00022772058,0.9777323,0.000012239523,0.000008208828,5.559074e-7,0.00034883586,0.0008987731,0.00017958453,0.000100295794,0.013299744,0.0070343176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049862143,0.0001893949,0.9801197,0.000012941794,0.0000030187755,9.2453087e-7,0.000057655834,0.00611308,0.00017360994,0.0004532961,0.012276651,0.00010112246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058831275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04356018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037677053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017776799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045410987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97389233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003349472","doi":"10.1071/wr03072","title":"Use of infrared digital cameras to investigate the behaviour of cryptic species","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Carnivore; Endangered species; Species complex; National park; Ecology; Geography; Biodiversity; Remote sensing; Biology","score_opus":0.09926182664020801,"score_gpt":0.30849934594904715,"score_spread":0.20923751930883916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003349472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921069,0.0000071177624,0.00003661036,0.005572327,0.000034657958,0.0003069127,0.000015896569,0.000010402012,0.0019091357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613035,0.00001100557,0.0004138972,0.00069918076,0.000022603357,0.000025367526,0.0000048392562,0.000008737305,0.0026840237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985416,0.00010924096,0.0002515094,0.00019292143,0.00060420134,0.0003005585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991138,0.00028943218,0.000059611706,0.00036186454,0.000056309244,0.000118973316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055525475,0.00007973083,0.00012820456,0.000081890976,0.0001484092,0.00004087528,0.000365691,0.000064109576,0.00033752635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009008446,0.000059864287,0.00004278479,0.00066849444,0.0010914388,0.00035062482,0.00034863257,0.00022217515,0.0003603753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036760386,0.00008931342,0.98349994,0.0000053644626,0.000009036289,0.000004058326,0.00072244805,0.0019985046,0.0013798733,0.000742113,0.011274151,0.00023846017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001533796,0.00019628333,0.9905018,0.000024281017,0.00000445453,0.0000023839575,0.00024508053,0.000026976517,0.0009857132,0.0022857636,0.0055066776,0.000067212204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009042106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012210562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070018764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010758458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008988461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46320158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007640618","doi":"10.1071/wr02028","title":"How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Threatened species; Selection (genetic algorithm); Wildlife conservation; Ecological trap; Wildlife management; Wildlife; Foraging; Umbrella species; Biodiversity; Allee effect; Population; Metapopulation; Conservation biology; Optimal foraging theory; Biological dispersal; Biology","score_opus":0.028113851365260786,"score_gpt":0.2843409017106272,"score_spread":0.2562270503453664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007640618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95088035,0.000040038136,0.0008974884,0.03735705,0.000078771336,0.00082812115,0.0000052031933,0.00003666799,0.009876295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906095,0.0002109117,0.0020213665,0.0027090947,0.000029052919,0.00016342892,0.0000055421797,0.000017042072,0.0042340164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979341,0.0004572715,0.00020716524,0.00039846005,0.00057237706,0.00043063855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923056,0.00025227576,0.000063871434,0.00023228368,0.0000660714,0.00015495902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001609346,0.00013170947,0.00016201615,0.00017684665,0.00036565596,0.00007146464,0.00018046056,0.0001042832,0.0001100207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040159852,0.00012880744,0.00002853431,0.0010016507,0.00047848455,0.000276588,0.00014854751,0.00021138016,0.00007329539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053215623,0.000057399975,0.9203461,0.000044806973,0.000022696871,0.0000020309897,0.0003417747,0.00004818619,0.00041258908,0.030696888,0.045587417,0.0023869385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005787182,0.00037144552,0.8374884,0.00004923178,0.000017381788,0.000013146128,0.0014482952,0.00021284008,0.00047629725,0.022917252,0.13618135,0.00024563988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023679552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016199804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090593934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013162516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039050137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5252615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009766541","doi":"10.1071/wr14050","title":"Responses of red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi) to windrows of woody debris along forest–clearcut edges","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clearcutting; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Debris; Habitat; Coarse woody debris; Population; Context (archaeology); Environmental science; Logging; Forest management; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.048471570730324036,"score_gpt":0.3216072904469489,"score_spread":0.27313571971662487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009766541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98970896,0.000033724868,0.00019636042,0.0056969468,0.00005817322,0.00040426574,0.00000822771,0.000027984628,0.0038653705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663115,0.000029787243,0.0011442553,0.00045799385,0.00006945743,0.000052064814,0.0000058477635,0.000024183737,0.0015852748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996783,0.0008711179,0.00045224917,0.00043470334,0.00087628973,0.0005826304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978324,0.0011394803,0.00011115507,0.0006049764,0.00010484033,0.00020714015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032424743,0.00015125655,0.0003111064,0.00024077772,0.0002336906,0.000020536176,0.0006300372,0.00017250096,0.00054001354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023989407,0.00014208189,0.00008057432,0.00078988436,0.00089825713,0.00021049459,0.00049843156,0.00030227494,0.00041365763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040928656,0.00013314276,0.9569793,0.00003282574,0.000019896963,0.000004625791,0.00044633925,0.00030829498,0.008419638,0.00048467162,0.028054709,0.0047073127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003211922,0.00056078803,0.9801481,0.00007321722,0.000007685589,0.000006707542,0.00032685694,0.00048860244,0.004323198,0.0012504507,0.012346121,0.00014711056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00127568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001315674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023168813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009460163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008343965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.591277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013953963","doi":"10.1071/wr10105","title":"Assessment of risks to non-target species from an encapsulated toxin in a bait proposed for control of feral cats","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Pellet; Introduced species; Zoology; Invasive species; Context (archaeology); Ecology","score_opus":0.12304024322584177,"score_gpt":0.3884643711307956,"score_spread":0.26542412790495384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013953963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99443674,0.000004918219,0.0017360992,0.00068404945,0.000047049845,0.0012396832,0.000073588766,0.000008545413,0.0017693158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301934,0.0000036706451,0.006324342,0.00026776342,0.000028633574,0.000121655976,0.00002461443,0.000011627641,0.00019837542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980972,0.00031812617,0.00038053733,0.0003385444,0.0004657948,0.00039981588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913746,0.00024377057,0.00008683717,0.00032349577,0.00007641443,0.0001319989],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001656562,0.00010417056,0.00027132974,0.00014530984,0.000081264974,0.000008754328,0.00038712993,0.00012495476,0.0013048609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018816121,0.00009612636,0.00004462618,0.00040737688,0.00026648666,0.00018780958,0.00011963881,0.00021109276,0.00003203645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029977036,0.0004503603,0.9762963,0.000011434946,0.00001890681,0.0000033581298,0.0011898855,0.00031353458,0.020055363,0.00020797567,0.0008903992,0.00026267947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011643635,0.00072793296,0.984242,0.00002284216,0.0000054667416,2.3015467e-7,0.00026081863,0.008500666,0.003201948,0.0016054887,0.00017242046,0.0000957809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068190056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018211531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016853416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016072838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012447084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018208871","doi":"10.1071/wr03087","title":"An evaluation of transect, plot and aerial survey techniques to monitor the spatial pattern and status of the bilby (Macrotis lagotis) in the Tanami Desert","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Aerial survey; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Physical geography; Remote sensing; Biology","score_opus":0.07272072530183193,"score_gpt":0.36790497603035704,"score_spread":0.2951842507285251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018208871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941299,0.000034163797,0.00006942592,0.004611867,0.000028205772,0.001011787,0.000028121323,0.0000049841724,0.00008155478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993398,0.00006682943,0.000063078005,0.00034954588,0.000055233584,0.00010534757,0.000004306387,0.000007104554,0.000008719117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587387,0.0026019185,0.00021526995,0.00020511386,0.0008258262,0.00027800442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904215,0.00048263784,0.000049853086,0.00030956315,0.000062439714,0.000053363885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007300691,0.00007552982,0.000107304935,0.0000509447,0.00018913277,0.000026439928,0.00034923913,0.00007173088,0.00008237841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003841352,0.000041913594,0.000015850701,0.00038075354,0.0004992823,0.00013820124,0.000106500775,0.0002172742,0.0000033964866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007470428,0.00007262772,0.92535555,0.0000039502797,0.00000425058,1.9018695e-7,0.0019436835,0.00010441217,0.0016868594,0.000006900673,0.00044001764,0.07030687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002696953,0.00019817482,0.9953436,0.000012952028,0.0000069060757,0.0000016642164,0.0002562404,0.0023471552,0.001132543,0.000116297655,0.0002673369,0.00004742908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029783675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095564075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07025944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008168315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058120535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97667706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021585787","doi":"10.1071/wr11035","title":"Effects of egg oiling on ground-nesting double-crested cormorants at a colony in Lake Ontario: an examination of nest-attendance behaviour","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Context (archaeology); Incubation; Biology; Ecology; Population; Zoology; Cormorant; Wildlife management; Attendance; Wildlife; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.06304438894003343,"score_gpt":0.3414537574102087,"score_spread":0.2784093684701753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021585787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986177,0.000015912596,0.0000024429899,0.000033159045,0.000094245464,0.0005838788,0.0000041289977,0.000013945596,0.00063460047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986542,0.00000381285,0.00016471218,0.000022636848,0.000025113584,0.00007430168,0.000015136512,0.0000168513,0.0010232779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770975,0.0003294548,0.00032554087,0.00030764178,0.00069876737,0.00062884926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901116,0.0003921173,0.0001312449,0.0002653267,0.000038198268,0.00016194144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002050147,0.00013331957,0.00024442244,0.00016346244,0.00017481208,0.00000902717,0.00029565595,0.00017168312,0.00036617933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011795708,0.00012950115,0.000034918143,0.0004996395,0.00043176397,0.00040510978,0.00023877331,0.00045113248,0.0001034227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023753411,0.0009293799,0.9855759,0.000044548637,0.0000027418125,0.000030025865,0.0014671661,0.000051453364,0.00914542,0.000012341058,0.000031664447,0.002471826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011794441,0.00054994173,0.99342394,0.00010566071,0.000011519726,0.000011355911,0.00010533875,0.000032693235,0.0044135903,0.00000570002,0.000044671124,0.00011616729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006738513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18951598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18277746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057504926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004589489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021994883","doi":"10.1071/wr04093","title":"Home ranges of feral cats (Felis catus) in central-western New South Wales, Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Home range; Feral cat; CATS; Habitat; Woodland; Predation; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Wildlife; Fauna; Biology; Felis catus; Medicine","score_opus":0.08799359204062367,"score_gpt":0.3447760694869446,"score_spread":0.25678247744632093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021994883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99124926,0.00006791157,0.000011945134,0.0075990153,0.000073412,0.00029662062,0.000009786527,0.000019773968,0.0006722712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988617,0.00005286373,0.00029024362,0.00042449462,0.00018261813,0.00001944414,0.000013903557,0.000014143726,0.010385278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760413,0.00026795024,0.00032341198,0.0003733056,0.00063650304,0.00079470535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992101,0.00012634532,0.0000618601,0.00033766287,0.000021080104,0.00024290885],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008789138,0.00013493361,0.00021316453,0.00015182885,0.00010362321,0.000026249963,0.00043692964,0.00017744723,0.0016536657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011029947,0.0001308533,0.000050056566,0.0005657392,0.0003585625,0.00029747715,0.00020962539,0.00045910277,0.0012543112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069279195,0.00010135881,0.96794164,0.000010703465,0.000007133184,0.000009438596,0.0018564187,0.00041175258,0.00025917927,0.000047748028,0.026974762,0.0023106062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006627655,0.00006908297,0.98641944,0.000026418944,0.000003775605,0.000003867259,0.0001485826,0.00010707109,0.00016241963,0.00019760772,0.012065048,0.00013391362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068969917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010983517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018477827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030932724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104968094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024814202","doi":"10.1071/wr05007","title":"Nest-tree selection by the threatened brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) (Marsupialia : Dasyuridae) in a highly fragmented agricultural landscape","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Deakin University","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Threatened species; Ecology; Biology; Near-threatened species; Diameter at breast height; Nest box; Habitat; Forestry; Geography; Predation","score_opus":0.016438360290522973,"score_gpt":0.26949297385112087,"score_spread":0.2530546135605979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024814202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788741,0.000117092044,0.000038547794,0.008645664,0.00014243001,0.00081165845,0.000015409916,0.000086604115,0.011268526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890733,0.00004255956,0.00008685319,0.00048040602,0.00023547489,0.0002743105,0.00017002488,0.000023510907,0.0096135875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963321,0.00070057274,0.0004223601,0.0006386493,0.0009826402,0.0009236539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990313,0.00032131746,0.00010294311,0.00035760578,0.000067024754,0.00011978836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015599303,0.00025067048,0.00024800427,0.00013018202,0.0007281851,0.00013471264,0.00059671124,0.0002362779,0.0013836431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001305319,0.00017740925,0.00008133955,0.0016944284,0.00041515072,0.0005239352,0.0002545251,0.0006818475,0.0010442483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114390416,0.00026982054,0.73653275,0.0000048749794,0.000012665281,0.0000084743615,0.000103068276,0.00021456691,0.004834087,0.00008716891,0.2572713,0.00054686895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016412007,0.0001775074,0.9755234,0.000020373378,0.000012963159,0.000017916782,0.0002434918,0.0012572901,0.00058331224,0.00039594655,0.01988701,0.00023957535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007212823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013849307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23899068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039288227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071786686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028933908","doi":"10.1071/wr05030","title":"Temporal dynamics of emergence and dispersal of garter snakes from a communal den in Manitoba","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Biology; Overwintering; Ecology; Population; Competition (biology); Juvenile; Zoology; Abundance (ecology); Mating; Demography","score_opus":0.028779041407658933,"score_gpt":0.28595117487329663,"score_spread":0.2571721334656377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028933908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99700457,0.000050341892,0.000057557518,0.0012508786,0.000025026186,0.00013771413,0.000021060214,0.000004458582,0.0014484184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936855,0.000021548685,0.00039200007,0.000046646568,0.000020049083,0.000011226583,0.00003257744,0.000005687329,0.000101739475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998788,0.00022065936,0.0002553156,0.00017459854,0.00034094937,0.0002204784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948657,0.00021278425,0.00005392587,0.00019220584,0.000018495753,0.000035997196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062964775,0.000065743065,0.00013648644,0.000070840535,0.00006675193,0.000006826491,0.00021834414,0.00007908471,0.00050874945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051168925,0.00006262214,0.000021497599,0.00026471558,0.0006138818,0.0001289813,0.00020483692,0.00020456398,0.000025032434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047402256,0.000112001995,0.9956795,0.000007679172,0.0000050604467,0.0000042134498,0.00018225203,0.00005537717,0.0003480699,0.00031753533,0.0026574978,0.0005833937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024203557,0.000063792744,0.9864647,0.00001992218,0.000002865851,0.000001039742,0.00055135356,0.009991743,0.000042487136,0.002401647,0.00016078848,0.00005766898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059781414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15587126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09608984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006454984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002035263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94647956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029438081","doi":"10.1071/wr06075","title":"Tree use by koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) after fire in remnant coastal forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phascolarctos cinereus; Ecology; Biology; Population; Eucalyptus; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Geography; Forestry; Demography","score_opus":0.03139229606173387,"score_gpt":0.3045463444673274,"score_spread":0.27315404840559354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029438081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98322636,0.000102249476,0.00013611969,0.001996306,0.000074841155,0.00059575145,0.000022915721,0.0000369783,0.013808465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98884165,0.00017182309,0.0002151067,0.0007928472,0.000109603636,0.000071912065,0.000024131285,0.00003440732,0.009738541],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962711,0.000180063,0.00037593656,0.0005917153,0.0013755753,0.0012056065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881834,0.00026484233,0.00003965288,0.0005206561,0.000019081643,0.00033744232],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025620293,0.00020740037,0.00021118062,0.00017054094,0.0001767207,0.00013826475,0.00048352798,0.00012076803,0.0010550794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018306951,0.00017178804,0.00007402726,0.00084970455,0.00036071477,0.00043268208,0.0006891854,0.00052808394,0.0009975717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017896021,0.00023842278,0.8356665,0.000012364102,0.0000075599,0.00025614473,0.00017563181,0.00004087349,0.00028670282,0.000021991935,0.14832476,0.0147900935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007992329,0.00013834877,0.75690347,0.000051333504,0.000003162073,0.000004606019,0.00016845216,0.000611405,0.00004744568,0.00009236446,0.24097711,0.00020308547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046325712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022184448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09265236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020497314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002045137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030398748","doi":"10.1071/wr14061","title":"Survival and cause-specific mortality of the female eastern wild turkey at its northern range edge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Range (aeronautics); Temperate climate; Biosecurity","score_opus":0.20440897436954492,"score_gpt":0.3596341922328944,"score_spread":0.15522521786334947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030398748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99398977,0.00017807735,0.0000021245203,0.0006517235,0.00016931644,0.00035703598,0.000019706522,0.000012492699,0.004619775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474007,0.000036933405,0.000010015271,0.000043688568,0.00006517248,0.000021038722,0.0000023911878,0.000014334153,0.0050663427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977298,0.000461922,0.00018895665,0.00033378456,0.0008537951,0.0004317612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990843,0.00010724941,0.00005384332,0.00047806048,0.000049154674,0.00022740768],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016182609,0.00011125253,0.0001667747,0.000029107392,0.00025018858,0.000017486522,0.00044063263,0.000115767354,0.00053276814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001098809,0.00007733006,0.00004593542,0.00028730815,0.0010059981,0.00012495025,0.0009668966,0.0003234634,0.0009462157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042995962,0.000096054355,0.99568367,0.000007330499,0.0000083921395,0.000013575234,0.0006454759,0.000014858233,0.00035514816,0.000015120759,0.002708415,0.0004089507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040322903,0.000064764165,0.9917819,0.000009588957,0.000007984265,0.0000073620154,0.00031945575,0.000028081873,0.00022486201,0.000041421757,0.0070225205,0.00008882364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028915392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047573354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004468181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020155369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004030634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030411425","doi":"10.1071/wr14134","title":"Mule deer–cattle interactions in managed coniferous forests during seasonal grazing periods in southern British Columbia, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Pinus contorta; Grazing; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Wildlife management; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Understory; Stocking; Wildlife; Forage; Forestry; Biology; Canopy","score_opus":0.03796460151613611,"score_gpt":0.28910767196069687,"score_spread":0.25114307044456075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030411425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996257,0.000033936012,0.0000048568536,0.0012633998,0.00012827195,0.0003043245,0.000014461998,0.000019168941,0.0019745734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99395514,0.0000055108776,0.00007463392,0.0002716949,0.00004718043,0.00011187209,0.000014935025,0.000017788523,0.00550124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977577,0.00036683667,0.0002549633,0.00037280415,0.0006135664,0.0006341581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993264,0.00018099963,0.000038699156,0.00020497649,0.000035877623,0.00021304122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011716826,0.00008372395,0.00015202007,0.0000722235,0.00029634926,0.00015674494,0.00029971913,0.000068618356,0.0006976621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036836075,0.00013252436,0.000023703831,0.0006142486,0.00021947065,0.0002740481,0.0002864424,0.0006378033,0.00021418638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024027,0.000074774056,0.98574793,0.000008436558,0.000004949323,0.00019809228,0.000533958,0.0008274702,0.000014831565,0.0000022340928,0.011718778,0.000844492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007066357,0.000021024582,0.99313045,0.000047581954,0.0000014257337,0.000042575906,0.002231976,0.0014159684,0.0000015025619,0.00017794597,0.00208977,0.0001331257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9684222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031384617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014488689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003923212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7638911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031219943","doi":"10.1071/wr10206","title":"A small dasyurid predator (Sminthopsis virginiae) rapidly learns to avoid a toxic invader","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Ecology; Predator; Context (archaeology); Introduced species; Toad; Zoology","score_opus":0.1289666662306906,"score_gpt":0.3163087975042859,"score_spread":0.1873421312735953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031219943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92542434,0.000063250336,0.0002209743,0.0016693353,0.00016248309,0.0007421684,0.000014795728,0.0000899377,0.07161269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775449,0.00008507309,0.0029756678,0.0019271579,0.0002081683,0.00013849241,0.000006412051,0.000046311914,0.017067783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670243,0.000535556,0.00029511692,0.00077521073,0.0006337829,0.0010578958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983726,0.0001567438,0.00004350571,0.0007381456,0.00003362004,0.0006553478],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016454648,0.0002035517,0.00023891762,0.00019009376,0.00029535455,0.000042261676,0.00087272,0.00021250293,0.01259267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040911883,0.00016698345,0.00009853831,0.0007155019,0.0007297018,0.00012775815,0.0011268733,0.0005619205,0.018791875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007625757,0.0011414383,0.5280312,0.00007502972,0.000117630596,0.0002460233,0.013965922,0.000039373346,0.06885434,0.00069634954,0.3414908,0.044579342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010420008,0.0017807981,0.3012044,0.00009406895,0.000017758233,0.00007586156,0.0021536534,0.00021267476,0.008171948,0.00061804894,0.6837167,0.00091205136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010163634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081024034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3422259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020907771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079161844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031846047","doi":"10.1071/wr04031","title":"Home range of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), a marsupial carnivore, in a rainshadow woodland","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Woodland; Home range; Carnivore; Ecology; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Predation; Habitat","score_opus":0.02804340595625633,"score_gpt":0.29110458496967967,"score_spread":0.26306117901342335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031846047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98874944,0.000074352814,0.0000031806107,0.0054940553,0.00009211686,0.0005561311,0.000011232642,0.000018377303,0.005001083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965248,0.000041052903,0.00013407912,0.0009385063,0.00012538685,0.00007557257,0.000004440426,0.000016767237,0.0021393716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971542,0.00062907336,0.0003405295,0.00037099057,0.00088860217,0.0006166449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902344,0.0002813044,0.00007902429,0.00047582574,0.00003234741,0.000108079934],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018803682,0.00014059318,0.00022664474,0.00015347786,0.00021952255,0.000025005955,0.0006697931,0.00018979276,0.0010846967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028819486,0.00010663172,0.000094152005,0.0011560768,0.0006116457,0.00020401532,0.00045352927,0.00061849866,0.0005119762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017006989,0.0001394698,0.9906803,0.000010219999,0.000010468671,0.000010351686,0.00047028245,0.00032802433,0.000025566467,0.000094713025,0.0062315906,0.0018289437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011827138,0.000067141555,0.98829305,0.000029734829,0.0000053550953,0.000008028779,0.00009038758,0.001057674,4.4915433e-7,0.0003995045,0.008745304,0.00012064718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012248036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047263955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077753523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032237923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009951651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982846},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2031927163","doi":"10.1071/wrv36n4_ed","title":"Wildlife Research in a changing world","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Scope (computer science); Geography; Environmental planning; Habitat; Discipline; Ecology; Political science; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.11248800991733524,"score_gpt":0.38911034706574815,"score_spread":0.2766223371484129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031927163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84551054,0.00007796319,0.00002271284,0.04815118,0.00010166368,0.0006445112,0.0000017063895,0.000068486785,0.10542123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768747,0.00006932687,0.00034066537,0.00528138,0.00025633455,0.00011617458,0.000007937626,0.000021401493,0.01703206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390554,0.0012978459,0.00038741576,0.0007400056,0.0017551495,0.0019140425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998185,0.0007946686,0.000042031435,0.00062311254,0.000071330105,0.0002838837],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011066311,0.00017499882,0.00023645519,0.0027026318,0.0007832282,0.00010085814,0.0007946692,0.00018599335,0.0016003494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054215797,0.00017556884,0.000059361846,0.011045062,0.0006598643,0.0004807153,0.0004942939,0.0016794734,0.004316296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105976374,0.0002955363,0.86513823,0.000008218316,0.000005128834,0.00011646065,0.00080153235,0.00018210824,0.00018264026,0.0054838746,0.11213044,0.015549836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006359841,0.0002624813,0.8280648,0.0000974546,0.0000018605778,0.000011278974,0.00054755085,0.0016772039,0.000030715684,0.013394539,0.15501676,0.0002593557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040597995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010133747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13136418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068834703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011927044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032513942","doi":"10.1071/wr05091","title":"Long-term automated monitoring of the distribution of small carnivores","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Felis catus; Erinaceus; Wildlife; Carnivore; Camera trap; Geography; Footprint; Tracking (education); Zoology; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Predation; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04850687233604614,"score_gpt":0.3342857288054747,"score_spread":0.2857788564694286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032513942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99844,0.000027828577,0.00012534218,0.00037329312,0.00011757113,0.00019873155,0.0000052870396,0.000030220448,0.00068171846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958307,0.000013816387,0.000071981754,0.00001832816,0.000042505693,0.0000066544076,0.0000063553043,0.0000055713335,0.0002517206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863535,0.0001803541,0.00023990941,0.00015421581,0.0004787638,0.000311407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992549,0.00027046454,0.00008602797,0.000279228,0.00005573446,0.000053689047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018484261,0.00006120743,0.00009717149,0.00003647343,0.00017493343,0.0000061183305,0.00034907061,0.000097154676,0.00007910787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031371796,0.00004626877,0.000046082216,0.000578765,0.0005420865,0.000072446055,0.00024641844,0.00022158267,0.000037146758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000313888,0.000062440035,0.9956532,0.000016649847,0.000008044077,0.0000022696047,0.00012120663,0.00012547585,0.0017594282,0.000081676524,0.0007923149,0.0013459082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013499927,0.00004476165,0.9947728,0.000036959813,0.000004343076,0.0000020758437,0.00006755548,0.0002446893,0.004461005,0.00006159559,0.0001271598,0.000042040137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052003696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000209966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027015766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013949018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003581387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19973403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033740351","doi":"10.1071/wr12115","title":"Importance of getting the numbers right: quantifying the rapid and substantial decline of an abundant marsupial, Bettongia penicillata","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Colorado State University","keywords":"Ecology; Mark and recapture; Population; Endangered species; Population size; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Geography; Context (archaeology); Population decline; Wildlife; Threatened species; Nest (protein structural motif); Occupancy; Marsupial; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.05598821278998205,"score_gpt":0.3308031804190195,"score_spread":0.27481496762903745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033740351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892316,0.000135693,0.00001620299,0.008734904,0.000057554953,0.0005062744,0.00000579777,0.000010329852,0.0013016523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879247,0.00012488566,0.00038846149,0.00049513497,0.00006238524,0.000026959036,0.0000059555723,0.000012717469,0.00009104177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976318,0.00052784756,0.0004212279,0.00030629718,0.00069899583,0.0004138167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982506,0.00086692197,0.0001776046,0.0005534161,0.000067788176,0.00008367114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036271405,0.000111944515,0.0001830393,0.000043307504,0.00055703224,0.000048012826,0.0006398298,0.00008301273,0.0016632498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033513608,0.00006582603,0.00004707748,0.00043391,0.0015639875,0.0003601884,0.00045395055,0.00037838222,0.0000618872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041523504,0.000047639696,0.9897732,0.000015236809,0.000019728253,0.0000029110283,0.00055121514,0.000040288825,0.0019299497,0.0004659508,0.0037856286,0.0033267057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002481053,0.00010932539,0.9920907,0.000018398447,0.000010249626,0.000012756316,0.0006705613,0.0040447516,0.00034640558,0.0010368528,0.001320823,0.00009104111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002817697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019611944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009560868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037710633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050490187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037449408","doi":"10.1071/wr12024","title":"Hidden biodiversity in rare northern Australian vertebrates: the case of the clawless geckos (Crenadactylus, Diplodactylidae) of the Kimberley","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phylogeography; Allopatric speciation; Biodiversity; Biogeography; Biology; Subspecies; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Genetic diversity; Range (aeronautics); Context (archaeology); Biodiversity hotspot; Lineage (genetic); Geography; Endemism; Phylogenetic tree; Evolutionary biology; Population; Paleontology","score_opus":0.04840640790592702,"score_gpt":0.3005431618873764,"score_spread":0.25213675398144936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037449408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938597,0.00006201752,3.695324e-7,0.0034514088,0.00011968142,0.00048203382,0.00004439135,0.000005534612,0.0019748777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873763,0.000024612691,0.00000841828,0.00014739459,0.000046553054,0.000008650274,0.0000019788235,0.000007381217,0.0010173997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754226,0.00094609894,0.00024526415,0.00022419474,0.0004619587,0.00058021117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987394,0.00023494072,0.000111200745,0.0007629373,0.00003199996,0.00011952896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013073555,0.00012485957,0.00017423782,0.0000391393,0.0003796014,0.000012845548,0.0010755756,0.0001455773,0.00079823163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015995256,0.00005663634,0.00012132328,0.00066493946,0.0020248103,0.00011645085,0.0011314903,0.00052695716,0.00019232533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004457061,0.00012285443,0.98841584,0.000014936284,0.000014305509,0.00001519326,0.0020216482,0.000017956636,0.0012391136,0.00006331505,0.007018657,0.0010115873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003986225,0.000066458124,0.9821294,0.00004352193,0.0000125616325,0.000088269706,0.0040834756,0.00004795489,0.0022672212,0.00008051006,0.010656336,0.00012567386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020211868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027486788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00727492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020527694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073431955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99025905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037716593","doi":"10.1071/wr06156","title":"Dispersal and the influence of rainfall on a population of the carnivorous marsupial swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Deakin University","keywords":"Biology; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Population; Marsupial; Range (aeronautics); Zoology","score_opus":0.01955521751591842,"score_gpt":0.26845251429362466,"score_spread":0.24889729677770622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037716593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953471,0.00003075524,0.00000734628,0.0027088535,0.000055022556,0.0005367146,0.000011325029,0.00001190828,0.0012910072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998978,0.00007973922,0.000046792647,0.0004932278,0.000032898755,0.000026680242,0.0000027147353,0.000010081086,0.00032984666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763155,0.00066843524,0.00032075692,0.00027304702,0.00079898484,0.0003072505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998526,0.0008018915,0.00012959942,0.00044312302,0.000043247775,0.000056163357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014957403,0.00011768505,0.00020885689,0.00007163422,0.00047912393,0.000010458275,0.00048024123,0.00012500386,0.000063300184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089021085,0.00007134279,0.0000735744,0.00049447146,0.0024925377,0.00013984834,0.00039533828,0.0004556012,0.00002070003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046251446,0.00007520709,0.99514294,0.0000128566,0.000013058793,0.00000665577,0.0010254137,0.0006673651,0.00027892002,0.0007689631,0.0007664911,0.00077960076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089807645,0.00013782445,0.9966025,0.000037798698,0.00000756857,0.00003929664,0.00007872838,0.0009505937,0.00004647414,0.0008564449,0.00027040625,0.000074288364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074607055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010757279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063849776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007921639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005169919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041916934","doi":"10.1071/wr11179","title":"Factors influencing the annual risk of bird–window collisions at residential structures in Alberta, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Geography; Residence; Collision; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Hazard; Rural area; Demography; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Biology; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.030480287115077827,"score_gpt":0.3087218696499538,"score_spread":0.27824158253487596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041916934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99878037,0.000031281266,3.885713e-7,0.00037928918,0.00012625945,0.00025203705,0.000044946617,0.0000051183288,0.000380332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990751,0.0000120008945,0.000013537804,0.0000690509,0.000043874337,0.000014180233,0.000002491695,0.000013025336,0.0007567103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976369,0.000525895,0.00022667095,0.00019065765,0.0007624841,0.00065740297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854434,0.0008847722,0.000069900256,0.00030787868,0.000021441907,0.00017168661],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095972914,0.000103118036,0.00014104681,0.00006756861,0.00048183938,0.000009821143,0.0004380209,0.000106161475,0.0015248612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005610231,0.000065983186,0.000036034784,0.00045516124,0.00053905963,0.00020878726,0.00054272066,0.00051219575,0.00007972982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002069456,0.000030769388,0.9917689,0.0000021284052,0.0000065085615,0.0000031172317,0.002159967,0.00020851089,0.00018762641,0.000018147153,0.0054800124,0.0001136294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013831786,0.000026558506,0.9949691,0.0000048011016,0.000007667349,0.0000021092624,0.0019433569,0.0000034872455,0.000738718,0.000043773856,0.002048641,0.0000734483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88196224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9797564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09779415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005966944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018008625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042376425","doi":"10.1071/wr14138","title":"Attachment and performance of Argos satellite tracking devices fitted to black cockatoos (Calyptorhynchus spp.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Department of the Environment, Australian Government; Murdoch University","keywords":"Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Satellite tracking; Ecology; Biology; Zoology; Engineering; Satellite","score_opus":0.09256437253918678,"score_gpt":0.3608102659776521,"score_spread":0.2682458934384653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042376425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958126,0.00008408418,0.000011448693,0.0007744842,0.000037858117,0.00039578663,0.0000043117525,0.000017518043,0.002861891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981033,0.00006430383,0.00042623378,0.0002673503,0.000038357717,0.000025199712,0.0000033379165,0.000011499097,0.001060405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980861,0.00016066516,0.00023468907,0.00033650675,0.00068139256,0.0005006708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916756,0.00010892791,0.000045460165,0.0002609921,0.000051059265,0.0003660047],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013818846,0.00011421232,0.00017871316,0.000088388384,0.00013902989,0.000027209142,0.00028611143,0.00009973313,0.00045516263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009540874,0.00009970641,0.000024223973,0.00041177624,0.0005542404,0.0002082624,0.00034885787,0.00027139398,0.0014044002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009578152,0.00009834935,0.98181224,0.00002121335,0.0000059720746,0.000009013529,0.00080083334,0.000080630285,0.00083009293,0.0000048444144,0.0027865851,0.013454444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003125714,0.00049581495,0.982507,0.000034061715,0.0000070114156,0.000006619954,0.00033480296,0.00023298286,0.0019164381,0.00001647201,0.014016274,0.000119939075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000720898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013853693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013334505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016179186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003892358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044106716","doi":"10.1071/wr04037","title":"Movements and home ranges of radio-tracked Crocodylus porosus in the Cambridge Gulf region of Western Australia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Dry season; Juvenile; Home range; Wet season; Geography; Seasonal breeder; Crocodylus; Seasonality; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.06719073729639276,"score_gpt":0.3368331616688021,"score_spread":0.2696424243724094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044106716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940228,0.00005154234,0.0000124792505,0.0030659756,0.000025947078,0.00043148507,0.000003583633,0.00000435097,0.002381847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815094,0.00037794415,0.000038743667,0.0001954198,0.000013120852,0.00003509485,0.0000020186803,0.000005022149,0.0011817113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986547,0.00015912131,0.00020509804,0.00021175266,0.00045449837,0.0003148159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956137,0.00010790867,0.000057895264,0.00022672767,0.000012770134,0.00003330603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011475252,0.000080718615,0.00016394832,0.00009053402,0.000106703905,0.000009716532,0.00030636296,0.000053248627,0.00003684515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004766478,0.00006008655,0.000022987993,0.00031418147,0.0008334886,0.00011499723,0.0003004467,0.00017466451,0.000027009835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066261964,0.00019089066,0.9852169,0.00005664327,0.000021292826,0.000048017864,0.0012343182,0.000100023644,0.0002389676,0.0002834874,0.012321232,0.00022192331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091611786,0.00021118745,0.99599093,0.000028758557,0.0000047512813,0.000004940254,0.000701431,0.0000026305431,0.00013731988,0.0006125781,0.0013311687,0.000058174264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016834883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018801582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010990063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072592455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007846874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30710235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045413625","doi":"10.1071/wr06110","title":"Broad-scale environmental influences on the abundance of saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) in Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carbon Engineering (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Crocodylus; Crocodile; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Wetland; Habitat; Population; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.049192032319576626,"score_gpt":0.3346539384556485,"score_spread":0.28546190613607186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045413625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99490625,0.000018208353,0.000010926315,0.001947044,0.00004958407,0.00039807387,0.000009889056,0.000011134464,0.0026488795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688137,0.000025922398,0.00007966754,0.0006420723,0.000046302954,0.000037952905,0.0000056187446,0.000010789148,0.002270295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765676,0.00020856544,0.00037235144,0.00035505724,0.00078364834,0.00062359445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890774,0.00056065136,0.00007858729,0.00034889177,0.000009031732,0.00009511291],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026343295,0.00013248938,0.0001490086,0.0001113418,0.0002464781,0.000031583433,0.0005345828,0.00014060672,0.0024552974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009901475,0.000096149655,0.000047232043,0.00043073963,0.0013407611,0.00024041304,0.00023477532,0.00051237387,0.0014921048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011794326,0.00017068688,0.9889291,0.0000053138383,0.0000051183,0.000012099007,0.0006125821,0.00017018431,0.0041280696,0.00014429448,0.0044795284,0.0012250597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024048654,0.00013427314,0.988797,0.00002527697,0.0000016058486,0.0000039577776,0.00050000753,0.00004453584,0.0021973874,0.0008848575,0.0070648333,0.00010579024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007901245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010758955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002585305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021595549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020018771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046448571","doi":"10.1071/wr10090","title":"Estimating the population size of a threatened arboreal marsupial: use of distance sampling to dispense with ad hoc survey techniques","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Population size; Population; Population viability analysis; Sampling (signal processing); Distance sampling; Arboreal locomotion; Context (archaeology); Abundance (ecology); Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Computer science; Biology; Endangered species; Environmental science","score_opus":0.07846261288892997,"score_gpt":0.35088234687129916,"score_spread":0.2724197339823692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046448571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99533236,0.0000035213172,0.0028084235,0.0011215637,0.000038091213,0.0005490751,0.000026555972,0.000024491617,0.00009591106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95864844,0.000005598996,0.04102601,0.00012652627,0.00002422648,0.000057437348,0.000017287251,0.000015418082,0.00007906775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982173,0.00033891687,0.00028526122,0.00027583583,0.00057958165,0.00030311357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756175,0.001676942,0.00012425982,0.0004603444,0.00009870066,0.000077982164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026010512,0.00010288127,0.00017505752,0.00005097753,0.00022940878,0.00003208346,0.00031084122,0.00008918959,0.00009053331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021080333,0.00007006162,0.000026692416,0.0006485251,0.00046876518,0.00023615595,0.00019359082,0.00034720224,0.000009853355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033301933,0.00005391559,0.9902074,0.000010167037,0.000007658486,0.0000010141533,0.00015884964,0.00029248543,0.0018519389,0.00018306266,0.00030393762,0.006596571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010829495,0.00016333307,0.99716383,0.000041862855,0.0000046713963,0.000002176779,0.000018905293,0.0013209194,0.00021203209,0.0005602146,0.00032243173,0.00008133253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006038303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021273525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03821759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054203814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037224054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99658567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051321352","doi":"10.1071/wr05014","title":"The immediate impact of 1080 aerial baiting to control wild dogs on a spotted-tailed quoll population","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"NSW Department of Primary Industries","keywords":"Biology; Dingo; Population; Wildlife; Ecology; Predation; Zoology; Medicine","score_opus":0.02656552524991818,"score_gpt":0.3358626897373338,"score_spread":0.3092971644874156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051321352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98727745,0.000012876775,0.000019011191,0.01008531,0.00012457829,0.00063857925,0.000012196906,0.000025673813,0.0018043114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786973,0.000015083286,0.00007947221,0.0011087963,0.00047680718,0.000081224774,0.000011222754,0.000016979235,0.00034066214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997302,0.00053465646,0.00037564445,0.0003302492,0.0008103829,0.00064705475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982593,0.0010014428,0.00011099521,0.00038720111,0.000051991337,0.00018904799],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028208185,0.00013866487,0.00019247542,0.00011318087,0.0005600247,0.000051573552,0.0004051918,0.00016390868,0.0005749436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011963522,0.000097923396,0.00010627038,0.0005703175,0.0002200368,0.00021231057,0.00014083243,0.0004819977,0.0010632625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006555648,0.00008030857,0.97313297,0.0000019741258,0.00002452516,0.0000019295953,0.00015210283,0.004534092,0.00056623394,0.0002569039,0.013408394,0.007184985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085897377,0.00036768793,0.9925498,0.00001754932,0.000005897728,0.0000019223878,0.00004367443,0.00321193,0.000018653254,0.0002772306,0.0025410783,0.00010565303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020792473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009962182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019416763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048113242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000637599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052722082","doi":"10.1071/wr03098","title":"The influence of predation risk on foraging behaviour of brushtail possums in Australian woodlands","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Predation; Woodland; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Fauna; Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.03058703281397451,"score_gpt":0.32582711155791155,"score_spread":0.29524007874393704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052722082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956533,0.000008812212,0.0000023292291,0.0030240824,0.000016204222,0.00024625415,0.0000058275987,0.0000066066837,0.0010365978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990873,0.00006803757,0.00008151994,0.00008133968,0.000020831316,0.000030118967,0.000003601424,0.000005871035,0.0006213909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984339,0.00023848045,0.00030196123,0.00018942192,0.00052654924,0.0003096736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991267,0.00039016333,0.00011534133,0.00028236693,0.000037358885,0.00004811606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023617018,0.00006802833,0.00009828235,0.000091010814,0.00019063464,0.0000135694245,0.00033007882,0.000083844505,0.000122050624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038668365,0.000053138425,0.000027679826,0.00039450324,0.00038830633,0.00022128726,0.0001153584,0.00036451532,0.000095492636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006978035,0.00008854885,0.98213446,0.000004185696,0.0000037011096,7.582918e-7,0.0004012412,0.009292105,0.00025665708,0.00012504,0.0016246864,0.0059988233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026385684,0.00011772257,0.9969156,0.00003113397,0.0000027631643,6.2343224e-7,0.00016698182,0.00050770235,0.00034870364,0.00033442184,0.0012615607,0.00004896127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001884064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025062265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014781096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012911457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037687692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2848154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054131636","doi":"10.1071/wr11167","title":"Evidence for source–sink dynamics in a regional population of arctic ground squirrels (Urocitellus parryii plesius)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Council; Parks Canada","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Habitat; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Arctic; Geography; Population; Sink (geography); Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.249838221422681,"score_gpt":0.4210724452981908,"score_spread":0.17123422387550982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054131636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976348,0.00038535715,0.00023547823,0.0010320134,0.00005633961,0.000446547,0.0000036288423,0.000010450995,0.00019533046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985969,0.00015917946,0.0004531198,0.00008681413,0.00006703117,0.000097569464,0.000009488503,0.000012633167,0.00051726296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.0002025194,0.00025798474,0.00024893344,0.0005160438,0.0005960861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876875,0.00085844076,0.000068929876,0.00017322101,0.00003346412,0.00009721858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018902594,0.000099268196,0.00017953024,0.000098505385,0.0002402197,0.000010518627,0.00022513217,0.000116522504,0.00022524629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005381601,0.00009199009,0.000060065504,0.00038843654,0.0005220495,0.00034211087,0.00025274977,0.00025399262,0.00009003044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001477469,0.00016614274,0.9940552,0.00004082118,0.00000542386,0.0000010737878,0.0005095209,0.00005687429,0.00014902849,0.00086695433,0.00057852874,0.003422689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022129803,0.0001660815,0.9963626,0.000066036686,0.000009346041,0.0000048928073,0.0005165273,0.0012385584,0.0000057925154,0.000673133,0.000638853,0.00009686562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027837597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023961002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033258232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007491016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019332305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42082304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059004992","doi":"10.1071/wr14196","title":"The effect of research activities and winter precipitation on voiding behaviour of Agassiz’s desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tortoise; Survivorship curve; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Juvenile; Precipitation; Ecology; Desert (philosophy); Mark and recapture; Abiotic component; Wildlife management; Population; Biology; Demography; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.08912119933354325,"score_gpt":0.3906333435753175,"score_spread":0.30151214424177425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059004992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99375176,0.000112950875,0.0000053544127,0.0008390524,0.000064535,0.0003476824,0.0000029499715,0.000009444685,0.0048662615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982597,0.00005977972,0.0000346865,0.000014698616,0.000039807077,0.00006616242,0.0000021621884,0.000009043568,0.0015139214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967569,0.0015566248,0.00018343476,0.00022895605,0.00093948963,0.00033460453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682456,0.0026798402,0.00005956599,0.00026481022,0.00007629729,0.00009493906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006201327,0.00008260403,0.00013244945,0.00009029071,0.00030253918,0.000031496682,0.00026726245,0.00010018073,0.00003637694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015453785,0.00005294689,0.000031482214,0.00031655398,0.0009981435,0.00017425226,0.0002560322,0.00036942147,0.0000296242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085539493,0.00004730998,0.96489745,0.000022744896,0.000015183728,0.0000024055557,0.00086107175,0.000024771103,0.011959283,0.00025305458,0.010302832,0.010758473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080378127,0.003974328,0.9132591,0.00016334736,0.000010120321,0.000004679975,0.0021973853,0.00022417482,0.073673934,0.0015760795,0.0039819805,0.00013110082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000469563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019095837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061714653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015038862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004944665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3677701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059148513","doi":"10.1071/wr09129","title":"Justification for continued conservation efforts following the delisting of a threatened species: a case study of the woylie, Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi (Marsupialia : Potoroidae)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Government of Western Australia","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Conservation-dependent species; Conservation status; Near-threatened species; Endangered species; Critically endangered; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Population; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Wildlife; Habitat","score_opus":0.07683211321990467,"score_gpt":0.3439742307303185,"score_spread":0.26714211751041383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059148513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941922,0.000008350682,0.00006643203,0.0024722693,0.00031637092,0.0024753446,0.000014891543,0.000015922873,0.00043824984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985527,0.0000019327395,0.00025059588,0.00016640019,0.00007862399,0.00023448815,0.00000892768,0.000017071152,0.0006893061],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755436,0.00041546958,0.00055967085,0.00036790426,0.00073131314,0.000371289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997248,0.0014115903,0.0002959182,0.0008001325,0.0001862034,0.00005814038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042660255,0.00013799539,0.00023404633,0.0000642634,0.00090234686,0.000041119685,0.0006023661,0.00013523978,0.00011750687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002053393,0.0000913276,0.00012100705,0.0006803656,0.0005477582,0.00019534456,0.0003193824,0.00041265355,0.000009302375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000942217,0.00021219069,0.9830171,0.00002042991,0.000043918226,0.000011557542,0.0020403662,0.00006568541,0.010501713,0.00033051326,0.002931193,0.0007311039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00115762,0.00023589552,0.9866643,0.000028980476,0.0000819644,0.00004073535,0.005721349,0.0030343777,0.00068657217,0.0003569108,0.0018612661,0.00013004053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005251072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011931591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009815141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007979412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010111902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79380846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060250418","doi":"10.1071/wr10020","title":"Is there a conflict between cetacean conservation and marine renewable-energy developments?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"Marine Mammal Commission","keywords":"Renewable energy; Wildlife; Marine energy; Marine spatial planning; Fishery; Wind power; Marine conservation; Environmental resource management; Tidal power; Scale (ratio); Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Geography; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.08170286668010912,"score_gpt":0.3322588069745695,"score_spread":0.2505559402944604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060250418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8596733,0.0000717273,0.000016800466,0.004393954,0.00003197022,0.00020227514,0.000007732263,0.00003258637,0.13556962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98228455,0.00092248793,0.0014350738,0.0019246181,0.00011505651,0.00004614863,0.000017911168,0.000027424796,0.013226716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979762,0.000116433424,0.00022103664,0.00043394451,0.00074811676,0.00050427514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991812,0.000200129,0.000048501075,0.00031544833,0.000047044425,0.00020768159],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011841179,0.00014563891,0.00019157025,0.00005464012,0.00039397107,0.00007950314,0.0003300387,0.00009738171,0.005355022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014203662,0.00012758133,0.00002763256,0.00044111477,0.00041318196,0.00016522205,0.0018057519,0.00036664435,0.0003062924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011870135,0.000020747384,0.9179973,0.000017344126,0.000028396147,0.0000049254886,0.00012466377,4.953975e-7,0.00027465515,0.00015159047,0.059007693,0.022360347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015504868,0.000033225224,0.51445746,0.000006150631,0.0000033277684,0.0000021558294,0.000025146954,0.00005482503,0.00016179479,0.0003603058,0.48465544,0.00008514924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06672107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02806067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42564774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007834569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036964564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061619371","doi":"10.1071/wr12117","title":"Field testing of single-administration porcine zona pellucida contraceptive vaccines in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ASL Environmental Sciences (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Adjuvant; Context (archaeology); Population; Medicine; Vaccination; Biology; Animal science; Immunology; Zoology","score_opus":0.048950675794769416,"score_gpt":0.3023139367096526,"score_spread":0.2533632609148832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061619371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977569,0.000021720822,0.000090705675,0.007196267,0.00005753724,0.00066678406,0.0000022728054,0.000025653078,0.014370068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654955,0.0000070441656,0.0010114384,0.0006213975,0.00007514739,0.00013191657,0.00000907175,0.000014083905,0.0015803337],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997842,0.0003218998,0.00045031006,0.0003775007,0.0005042831,0.00050399336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814206,0.0012010846,0.0001240202,0.00028733595,0.0001290445,0.00011644413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011315303,0.00014227303,0.00022705313,0.0001505639,0.00013848233,0.0000406356,0.0002914529,0.00017602507,0.0041244663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017914351,0.00013411586,0.00003714159,0.00082339725,0.00020032248,0.00048557436,0.00016238498,0.00040136575,0.00075299456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091918366,0.00021114122,0.98149955,0.000015148692,0.0000065674226,0.000012293935,0.00027185283,0.00009247721,0.0059381467,0.0000471906,0.006954811,0.0048588705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056845177,0.00073193654,0.9941165,0.00005054278,0.0000041568983,0.00000771815,0.00037762127,0.001804664,0.00094411994,0.0006983917,0.0005562863,0.00013962801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011121454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016760073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018980576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014296992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007509736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062086019","doi":"10.1071/wr05001","title":"An assessment of the audibility of sound from human transport by breeding Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Noise (video); Sound (geography); Range (aeronautics); Snow; Underwater; Environmental science; Oceanography; Geography; Meteorology; Geology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06293892196125997,"score_gpt":0.39143610931277995,"score_spread":0.32849718735152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062086019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96969,0.00012868454,0.00009379303,0.0003557681,0.000027535541,0.00045509465,0.0001059353,0.000015517364,0.029127633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891776,0.000067611334,0.00042199274,0.000058819725,0.000061544255,0.000020850694,0.000021601674,0.000018812598,0.00041102577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996204,0.0003746721,0.0005631494,0.00052169093,0.0018442294,0.0004922536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986847,0.00023051705,0.00016137489,0.00074810296,0.00007126598,0.000104017265],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024917817,0.00016596018,0.00033828212,0.000027648475,0.00034702852,0.000019838571,0.0009152456,0.00009140207,0.0026585008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003459587,0.00012378828,0.00013344358,0.0005520302,0.0009507388,0.00017799118,0.00041777504,0.00040937428,0.000020062751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011334011,0.00040905076,0.9561883,0.00003937028,0.00001881148,8.7214335e-7,0.00009077066,0.00020326632,0.032890815,0.00027865745,0.009488233,0.0003804919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025272294,0.00019934135,0.9888431,0.00003099321,0.000014466682,2.6101898e-7,0.00013526036,0.00034856203,0.001823191,0.0030822097,0.005145539,0.00012434422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101711825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013625071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088086754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024330433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004031924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063309068","doi":"10.1071/wr03041","title":"Population structure, turnover and movement of spotted-tailed quolls on the New England Tablelands","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Biology; Population; Ecology; Wildlife management; Zoology; Wildlife; Demography","score_opus":0.02495570494433349,"score_gpt":0.2803911583633984,"score_spread":0.25543545341906493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063309068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99178123,0.000019861349,0.000022815188,0.006644865,0.000050189,0.00030752117,0.000006655978,0.000009577522,0.0011573081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980233,0.000022025748,0.00010391305,0.0011714338,0.00008205086,0.000008811497,0.000012647009,0.000007727976,0.0005681436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986471,0.0001467124,0.00017487009,0.00022352807,0.00054522057,0.00026256058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936837,0.00023526177,0.000055533972,0.00023968943,0.000017293507,0.000083851075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007968943,0.000088335415,0.00011168713,0.000059881277,0.0002199485,0.00002474901,0.00016957268,0.000090416106,0.0008943143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021239606,0.000058901747,0.00002040748,0.0003384055,0.00016959956,0.00012135865,0.00012275518,0.00026491855,0.0000570983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007953931,0.000036340673,0.9886608,0.0000043333926,0.000011660921,0.0000017753446,0.00025920518,0.0011017742,0.00057602365,0.0032212345,0.0048221108,0.001225175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008996873,0.00014545607,0.9751294,0.000017927396,0.000004225592,0.0000016547821,0.00004692646,0.000095200434,0.0001707454,0.021366287,0.0020575882,0.00006486636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021273452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012993328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018145053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012783785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038945986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97921145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065380933","doi":"10.1071/wr03131","title":"Can outbreaks of house mice in south-eastern Australia be predicted by weather models?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outbreak; Predictability; Geography; Population; Vegetation (pathology); House mouse; House mice; Climatology; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Demography; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10348331647345724,"score_gpt":0.34754355957436933,"score_spread":0.2440602431009121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065380933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99576116,0.000025991243,0.00001949554,0.0013713347,0.000023061362,0.00025944674,0.00009519965,0.000027146298,0.0024171954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958256,0.00002371908,0.0001028483,0.000093478695,0.000013887093,0.0000397658,0.0000038972307,0.000018504508,0.003878338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825966,0.00011880859,0.00022099882,0.00032348366,0.0005402818,0.0005367613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958265,0.0000403713,0.000040043462,0.00019785755,0.000020931584,0.000118150834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052138366,0.00011772389,0.00018275433,0.000071912764,0.00011323617,0.000010366863,0.0003256586,0.00014167267,0.00074032403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040483974,0.00010424224,0.000038454018,0.00033776043,0.0007317559,0.000116287505,0.00032315304,0.00040431414,0.00010665985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083002706,0.0003468899,0.9845735,0.000009988742,0.0000132067535,0.000024029709,0.004831612,0.00075562764,0.0016276019,0.00007685705,0.0075351186,0.00012257721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019028686,0.000611166,0.98968285,0.00006155326,0.000019979641,0.000005693281,0.0029893667,0.0005172755,0.0008103654,0.0012170676,0.0018614999,0.00032029714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010177027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049943435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005673619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023535873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003530474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066645665","doi":"10.1071/wr06081","title":"Usefulness of funnel traps in catching small reptiles and mammals, with comments on the effectiveness of the alternatives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Edith Cowan University","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Fauna; Ecology; Fossorial; Funnel; Biology; Squamata; Foraging; Abundance (ecology); Netting; Habitat; Environmental science","score_opus":0.06368735049202758,"score_gpt":0.30377699826938054,"score_spread":0.24008964777735298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066645665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99678266,0.000011335624,0.000047678477,0.0011735,0.000022602311,0.00043579738,0.0000025130605,0.0000029399732,0.001520961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999688,0.000009831941,0.000025445373,0.00017579875,0.000008330047,0.000028151646,6.551124e-7,0.000006410146,0.000057377005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979642,0.0010681028,0.0001649488,0.00018722872,0.00038493145,0.00023055809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684453,0.0027862615,0.00006959702,0.0002479695,0.000020884958,0.000030735642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006251955,0.000072900104,0.000119059056,0.000058828376,0.00016136686,0.0000078966805,0.00031504504,0.000048336475,0.000027392542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026812416,0.00003944855,0.00001928074,0.0003752881,0.0007360587,0.00006658151,0.00018397257,0.00030226915,0.0000033343447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038689055,0.00011536548,0.9952739,0.000027143866,0.000012244378,0.000002886296,0.0007495944,0.00016880663,0.0008872016,0.0013009985,0.00004724297,0.0010277539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036003452,0.00013570146,0.9939593,0.00015465684,0.0000023932346,0.0000021644446,0.0006685456,0.000075594646,0.0036185184,0.0009068415,0.00007256736,0.00004367044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012889743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016254322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005983831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006589107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020654552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27120388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068295275","doi":"10.1071/wr07106","title":"Achieving population goals in a long-lived wildlife species (Equus caballus) with contraception","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Veterinary Equine Medical Research","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Park Service; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Population; Population growth; Wildlife; Population control; Equus; Demography; Biology; Wildlife management; Family planning; Ecology","score_opus":0.259195008381391,"score_gpt":0.4383495313288694,"score_spread":0.1791545229474784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068295275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894383,0.0003248297,0.00042499325,0.00403433,0.000093367606,0.0014194107,0.000015855483,0.00016461402,0.0040843114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994488,0.00058410654,0.00050237443,0.00027813445,0.0005417436,0.00025312396,0.000108608576,0.00010286288,0.0031410654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99092287,0.0017862659,0.00077241455,0.0009819745,0.0036545403,0.0018819205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967784,0.0011220071,0.000121417244,0.0009021033,0.0004627278,0.0006133239],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003968399,0.00038615195,0.00066570274,0.0011593088,0.000621168,0.00014036437,0.0008030213,0.00029861002,0.0012398334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024727865,0.00033175256,0.00012146879,0.0017638772,0.0008674112,0.0007050936,0.0005679726,0.0019648967,0.0007547213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055765808,0.00084992446,0.9553479,0.00031122752,0.00008727915,0.012237336,0.0022774758,0.0001267382,0.009324331,0.0003410946,0.0074417535,0.006078376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023760037,0.0037283225,0.9839331,0.0005033865,0.0000065023874,0.0013790716,0.0005563545,0.0011776888,0.000015376823,0.000058994774,0.0058494257,0.00041577127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028652058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005866872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028585218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092240307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044807585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070674059","doi":"10.1071/wr04033","title":"Regional patterns of mammal abundance and their relationship to landscape variables in eucalypt woodlands near Darwin, northern Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland; Mammal; Wildlife; Ecology; Habitat; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Fragmentation (computing); Vegetation (pathology); Habitat fragmentation; Landscape ecology; Wildlife conservation; Biodiversity; Biology","score_opus":0.06414832363612448,"score_gpt":0.31698444309867424,"score_spread":0.25283611946254975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070674059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892794,0.000023529403,0.00009647723,0.009577209,0.00001893497,0.00021626694,0.00001036199,0.000011230449,0.00076661917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769366,0.000014244173,0.00054858386,0.0005027378,0.00007429814,0.00003669373,0.000014567865,0.000010061923,0.0011051462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848264,0.00023107443,0.00025423436,0.0003148448,0.00033704494,0.00038014218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991689,0.00038989546,0.000044194996,0.0002353615,0.00003019095,0.00013148658],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013112462,0.00010401575,0.00014389186,0.00010549897,0.00018563542,0.00003064861,0.00023791114,0.00012417475,0.00091768673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017310583,0.00009132717,0.000024531151,0.00046150573,0.00020812085,0.00021057579,0.00015826385,0.00034322115,0.00025633827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006679,0.00007399295,0.9913053,0.0000090760395,0.0000055184587,0.0000024488468,0.0011359164,0.0014452337,0.00005689268,0.00025168306,0.0046419892,0.0010051779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003319521,0.00007849937,0.98904884,0.000033753095,0.0000016544062,0.0000058103665,0.00024352317,0.0010418016,0.000012444639,0.00040557745,0.008700659,0.000095466356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097009144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007583254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009074472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009410418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004724549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074314079","doi":"10.1071/wr05038","title":"Dietary strategy of the swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus) (Marsupialia : Dasyuridae) in coastal and inland heathland habitats","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Deakin University","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Swamp; Generalist and specialist species; Predation; Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.0285564311319642,"score_gpt":0.288425299120768,"score_spread":0.25986886798880376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074314079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99103254,0.00013042477,0.0000052076152,0.0026686199,0.000083930376,0.0004352537,0.00003687925,0.000015373173,0.0055917795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984474,0.00004644651,0.000063519125,0.00017720491,0.000059752856,0.000018484634,0.000013385854,0.000014053922,0.0011597276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976005,0.00048664084,0.00037840017,0.00040606954,0.0006044379,0.00052395836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912864,0.0003454994,0.00007050853,0.0003482955,0.000026609807,0.00008043561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014146825,0.00015922125,0.00023012834,0.00012124076,0.00027157026,0.000039764014,0.00037623243,0.00017253563,0.00012993885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013605678,0.00012294039,0.000050186733,0.00062059116,0.0010652874,0.00021670168,0.00040484473,0.0005532624,0.000035787725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001144473,0.00016516318,0.98485124,0.000022279002,0.000006571851,0.00003834963,0.00009396265,0.00014214386,0.0010130248,0.000073276075,0.011284537,0.002194995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006937754,0.00014649998,0.9934095,0.00004976615,0.0000049384275,0.000030845524,0.00011695621,0.00057360367,0.00016329471,0.0034176526,0.0012634457,0.00012971998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008906578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015191739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100210905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007635187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008110528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076615238","doi":"10.1071/wr03068","title":"Status of Australian sea lions, Neophoca cinerea, and New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, on Eyre Peninsula and the far west coast of South Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Shaughnessy Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Fur seal; Geography; Reef; Fishery; Full moon; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.09791474959859696,"score_gpt":0.3499212276295176,"score_spread":0.25200647803092063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076615238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99193,0.00029602804,8.558406e-7,0.0049268785,0.00001757528,0.00061698724,0.00008660622,0.000010032517,0.0021150345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883934,0.0017949917,0.00018870602,0.00018126098,0.000087229615,0.000018042818,0.000008057787,0.000018927904,0.009309351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972643,0.000272491,0.00038805406,0.0004116444,0.00091899326,0.00074446946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987882,0.00025826454,0.00012673362,0.0003915061,0.00003993988,0.0003953598],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010289663,0.000208934,0.00039628067,0.00008180273,0.00020668544,0.00004376472,0.0003249351,0.000083112005,0.0011376159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018992483,0.00014298118,0.00006108316,0.0004294778,0.0011135717,0.00012476141,0.0008662808,0.0003879669,0.00008084382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006741425,0.000097122,0.93267715,0.000104861596,0.000051095925,0.000007775896,0.002302206,0.00007914688,0.00017921386,0.00023609266,0.051471405,0.01211981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022058508,0.0005344821,0.86480194,0.00007780889,0.000024283905,0.000012823705,0.0008950748,0.00014320643,0.00009152279,0.000117224205,0.13093829,0.00015750018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05846697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01322095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07946689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102345155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005174552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077486233","doi":"10.1071/wr04059","title":"Positive edge effects for arboreal marsupials: an assessment of potential mechanisms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"James Cook University","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Transect; Rainforest; Belt transect; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Brushtail possum; Biomass (ecology); Biology; Tropical rainforest; Marsupial; Habitat","score_opus":0.02297016836268857,"score_gpt":0.3565309861262355,"score_spread":0.33356081776354696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077486233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9664329,0.000009024991,0.025608718,0.0013124844,0.00015879663,0.0010395636,0.000035344627,0.000028961313,0.0053741694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896155,0.0000043356904,0.009160495,0.0002758538,0.00015569144,0.00019490287,0.00008840923,0.000017915327,0.00048688144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978056,0.00047616608,0.00024279613,0.00037254192,0.00061981915,0.00048309917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904174,0.00045265915,0.000073872354,0.00026373332,0.00006892979,0.00009905216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019027041,0.00011452842,0.00018311192,0.00009363824,0.00029906488,0.000027246675,0.00029566218,0.00014613799,0.00022548034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009662131,0.00010974276,0.00006814217,0.00027296811,0.0003068314,0.00023795918,0.0001635766,0.00020688422,0.000045563353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054454466,0.0022226586,0.74240875,0.00013973712,0.00008962081,0.000057412504,0.00019892104,0.0019299249,0.0841911,0.10745032,0.049755987,0.011011014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007235311,0.00085136096,0.95726293,0.000015814909,0.000015734027,0.0000036863066,0.00004621851,0.0073151886,0.0018618678,0.031411424,0.00036379832,0.00012845671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011369328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027554008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21485417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017971605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008043559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.447518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078319711","doi":"10.1071/wr06151","title":"Aerial baiting for wild dogs has no observable impact on spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus) in a rainshadow woodland","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Dingo; Population; Woodland; Ecology; Zoology","score_opus":0.07418041398655643,"score_gpt":0.35526872017146255,"score_spread":0.2810883061849061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078319711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99001956,0.000022209344,0.00006446758,0.0018551667,0.00027491048,0.0012593683,0.000024880324,0.000054535423,0.006424925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529165,0.000014978108,0.00071912317,0.0014321355,0.0005155851,0.00014541845,0.000055082088,0.000042047468,0.0017839767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961066,0.00032707577,0.0005085009,0.000687519,0.0008448681,0.0015254185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757475,0.0014776753,0.00010984574,0.00045113172,0.00007907253,0.00030750223],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059801675,0.00026878872,0.00035079505,0.0002821934,0.00063520804,0.00013555905,0.0004931443,0.00033431707,0.001239525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014587599,0.0002366494,0.00014915832,0.0010107942,0.00040500597,0.0003617244,0.00022737017,0.00071838824,0.0012271525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015242497,0.00022441956,0.96796924,0.000017899416,0.000023276007,0.000048291873,0.0002430093,0.0007068149,0.00043847968,0.00008810809,0.027339218,0.0013769919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024225523,0.00054735335,0.97588366,0.000070973285,0.000006497274,0.000008068303,0.00009569234,0.002905598,0.000012722177,0.0006983004,0.01706805,0.0002805176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029124953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022872465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010271168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017996841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081989450","doi":"10.1071/wr06168","title":"Post-fire recovery of eastern bristlebirds (Dasyornis brachypterus) is context-dependent","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of Wollongong","keywords":"Fire regime; Transect; Context (archaeology); Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Fire ecology; Habitat; Endangered species; Ecology; Wildlife management; Bay; Wildlife conservation; Range (aeronautics); Population; Ecosystem; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.042856486371278826,"score_gpt":0.29965017014271456,"score_spread":0.25679368377143574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081989450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853435,0.00040147145,0.00003913191,0.0009855711,0.00018263521,0.000669433,0.00009004172,0.000059057907,0.012229124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987273,0.00017755067,0.00008619941,0.00068155536,0.00011438451,0.000044295197,0.00000724438,0.000054679127,0.01156113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508643,0.00059698743,0.0005005305,0.00067745236,0.0023064802,0.000832145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980253,0.00043449024,0.00012877517,0.0009806228,0.000104629056,0.0003261745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002035815,0.00022906596,0.00042011286,0.0001411616,0.000320343,0.000047209964,0.00085129787,0.00017694774,0.002888645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041297617,0.00021528355,0.00019419055,0.00050523045,0.0006571787,0.00041446145,0.0006979921,0.00053554185,0.008492477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003474743,0.00058140507,0.7404822,0.00018256149,0.00012887428,0.00032077893,0.0020350858,0.00006833016,0.009629167,0.000017635635,0.09782269,0.1483838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004215854,0.0046832184,0.72787315,0.0005813455,0.000048332386,0.0008541248,0.0015874803,0.01446934,0.015921418,0.0002904443,0.22765002,0.0018252735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019766076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045924875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14655852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039112335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009453613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085020494","doi":"10.1071/wr04041","title":"Fecundity, egg size and the influence of rainfall in an isolated population of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Fecundity; Avian clutch size; Biology; Animal science; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Clutch; Ecology; Laying; Range (aeronautics); Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.026483842430877057,"score_gpt":0.33203083541951384,"score_spread":0.3055469929886368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085020494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99816906,0.00002215636,0.0000013564752,0.0010428338,0.0000074268346,0.00032999337,0.0000032476498,0.000005828097,0.00041809393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945515,0.000037861035,0.00012954611,0.00010080555,0.000013656239,0.000010751993,0.0000026793489,0.000006153759,0.00024341521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984939,0.00040179753,0.00026098796,0.0002035726,0.00037489878,0.00026484366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922067,0.00037024438,0.00006726852,0.00025177223,0.00002407581,0.000065974076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018360292,0.00006950911,0.00015639202,0.00005940467,0.00009878324,0.000009717789,0.0002850287,0.00010634994,0.00045278698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023106596,0.000051223913,0.000021589449,0.00034024753,0.000962186,0.00024665715,0.00020757245,0.0002811851,0.000043662814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016536516,0.000115062096,0.9941555,0.000007642438,0.0000023798327,0.0000020658226,0.0005691638,0.0013189263,0.0022114587,0.000050221508,0.00006487012,0.0013373161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007438313,0.000115585215,0.9977077,0.000012195026,0.0000036906893,0.000003100564,0.00005421648,0.00073209614,0.00009202323,0.00034159533,0.00014116637,0.000052796684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001086703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025244628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035521751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006757906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001566222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49576998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088839846","doi":"10.1071/wr14030","title":"Effects of low-level culling of feral cats in open populations: a case study from the forests of southern Tasmania","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Richmond Hospital","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Culling; CATS; Wildlife management; Context (archaeology); Feral cat; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Felis catus; Demography; Predation; Medicine","score_opus":0.21371573524756315,"score_gpt":0.3970402660471859,"score_spread":0.18332453079962274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088839846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99830216,0.000038726597,0.000024651425,0.0002943557,0.000036709233,0.0011832833,0.000025347657,0.0000031036616,0.000091670525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994965,0.0000014920626,0.00027501027,0.00004862639,0.000018835992,0.000076524484,0.0000064029805,0.000008877764,0.000067733854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979233,0.0007729974,0.00035234733,0.00021652535,0.00052108004,0.00021374166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875635,0.00066041615,0.00012227659,0.00033349483,0.00006314206,0.000064297325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023707133,0.00007793584,0.0002035153,0.00006507356,0.000094155715,0.0000133646445,0.000553044,0.00006795149,0.00005822691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007365977,0.000058746627,0.000026752568,0.0004943435,0.00029129337,0.0001507147,0.0005879218,0.000209904,0.00004320902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010005896,0.0005665638,0.98881406,0.000016501988,0.000012596086,0.00007086369,0.00858367,0.00073891005,0.000121906574,0.000024222634,0.0005694919,0.00038113393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011352054,0.00021441001,0.9875206,0.00005424888,0.000009801708,0.000006318729,0.007876424,0.00124751,0.000100606965,0.0017700373,0.000007956638,0.000056885965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11207568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06849805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04357763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008830375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009441891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94849944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089128489","doi":"10.1071/wr03046","title":"Using faecal pellet counts along transects to estimate quokka (Setonix brachyurus) population density","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Threatened species; Biology; Population density; Population; Pellet; Wildlife management; Marsupial; Ecology; Zoology; Wildlife; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0775627849432705,"score_gpt":0.3899367135325683,"score_spread":0.3123739285892978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089128489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920273,0.000011298448,0.00081186695,0.0031067708,0.000087769535,0.00026161558,0.0000034490627,0.000039960207,0.0036499947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948511,0.0000035452722,0.0030643777,0.001101172,0.00013076722,0.000009811574,0.000013738848,0.000014473644,0.000810992],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998359,0.00018769717,0.00017605485,0.00031051663,0.000553047,0.0004136546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946964,0.00010582212,0.00002600633,0.00021416164,0.000026064292,0.00015831746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008417257,0.000096399424,0.00011172352,0.000082276354,0.00037359234,0.00003905121,0.00018738651,0.00011674163,0.0013482071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000139399,0.00009933351,0.00003265432,0.00037733468,0.00011393507,0.00023376016,0.00010355568,0.00026732663,0.0042555253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003636466,0.00005397137,0.97552437,0.000005260921,0.0000055493765,0.000009444503,0.00017394654,0.00464188,0.0004997551,0.00025190227,0.01237483,0.0064227586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001599021,0.00003721632,0.96927637,0.000012429419,0.0000051886195,0.000013866707,0.000015847672,0.019145608,0.000065442,0.00027411475,0.010869178,0.00012486018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012747684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001734335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014503729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032963487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003679791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089309098","doi":"10.1071/wr08017","title":"Advances in wildlife ecology and the influence of Graeme Caughley","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Ecology; Environmental ethics; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Biodiversity; Conservation biology; Ecological stability; Conservation science; Environmental resource management; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.01872891194764521,"score_gpt":0.3115758321154054,"score_spread":0.2928469201677602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089309098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737306,0.00018789805,0.0000057510347,0.020569902,0.000025865482,0.00037024246,0.000001222171,0.0000109893135,0.0050974777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480355,0.0013366044,0.00009504879,0.0035015976,0.00002737197,0.00004148606,0.000001305258,0.0000046373752,0.0001883838],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979934,0.00057989627,0.00029716562,0.00029384598,0.00041088642,0.00042476895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987466,0.0008064202,0.0000700175,0.00027212093,0.000031770487,0.00007311286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002547484,0.0000972226,0.00020714293,0.000103246,0.00020027379,0.0000139980175,0.0003670613,0.00010944372,0.00009229755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077820866,0.000070275084,0.000027018268,0.00064499443,0.001676122,0.00038606618,0.00017909151,0.00039674604,0.00008700018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017576372,0.00005188279,0.9873628,0.0000060015873,0.000002342749,0.0000055955525,0.0003242429,0.0016018667,0.000058274978,0.003539224,0.0022111074,0.0046609007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088153826,0.00013995456,0.97482723,0.000016418264,0.0000024295914,0.000006574143,0.000111955305,0.00037666282,0.000006910267,0.016045954,0.0075120493,0.000072344694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003458912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010949532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021072913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070755836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043747317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6175741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090349066","doi":"10.1071/wr13211","title":"Reproductive seasonality in African ungulates in relation to rainfall","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Livestock Research Institute; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of British Columbia; Universität Hohenheim; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ungulate; Fecundity; Seasonality; Ecology; Biology; Forage; Wet season; Context (archaeology); Phenology; Dry season; Geography; Population; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0401490268679958,"score_gpt":0.3222859526010739,"score_spread":0.2821369257330781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090349066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96467435,0.000007173306,0.000046084893,0.020023914,0.000039671933,0.00039042588,9.1632006e-7,0.000017687405,0.014799765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774975,0.0000032903997,0.00038155378,0.00077671296,0.000065145636,0.00008320233,0.0000053680656,0.000008401952,0.00092655624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975151,0.000849794,0.00022313338,0.00051888387,0.00045755017,0.00043557255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907666,0.00041752952,0.000029886463,0.0003453027,0.000025475503,0.00010516381],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005745542,0.00008060711,0.00012578993,0.00013257955,0.000107027336,0.000018332516,0.00022854381,0.00009791148,0.00029978872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023381414,0.000082179446,0.00001886197,0.001325535,0.00019173427,0.00021400742,0.00021997164,0.0003945656,0.0008365121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000738727,0.00007658959,0.99050176,0.0000030043107,0.0000018256356,0.000003116195,0.00096679985,0.0014834116,0.00017150515,0.0009618379,0.0033257888,0.0024305137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022789564,0.000070092334,0.9821005,0.000014498137,7.2431936e-7,9.206701e-7,0.000124269,0.0014537347,0.000021084063,0.007471944,0.008424563,0.00008976977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022106492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039129686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033075407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042909305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000331961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091283353","doi":"10.1071/wr05101","title":"Diet of a native carnivore, the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), before and after an intense wildfire","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Predation; Ecology; Biology; Marsupial; Carnivore; Bandicoot; Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.022873773612239603,"score_gpt":0.3124786063002092,"score_spread":0.2896048326879696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091283353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956932,0.000065530905,0.000013256115,0.0021183218,0.00006292913,0.0004473824,0.000009735277,0.000022037968,0.0015675942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978416,0.000024532092,0.00012658899,0.0011612121,0.00007651553,0.000051351624,0.000009638672,0.000017640054,0.00069091487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976456,0.0003843365,0.00028598623,0.00039746394,0.00071892916,0.00056768267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887735,0.0003856169,0.0000770715,0.00041323074,0.00006576903,0.00018097053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032476042,0.00014756055,0.00018384619,0.00011596331,0.00034126404,0.000031205258,0.00037179716,0.00016583654,0.00030324745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031215366,0.0001031091,0.000051141276,0.0006525966,0.0014905275,0.0002851469,0.0003778302,0.0005426355,0.00008871151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006402149,0.00006927572,0.9918896,0.000008012371,0.000023709303,0.000039227314,0.0027903216,0.0000069713656,0.00002730599,0.00014251913,0.0012745068,0.0030883127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033016753,0.00048337405,0.9939961,0.000021843272,0.000010977513,0.000010797506,0.0014145991,0.00046730475,0.0000045375646,0.0010540602,0.0020999801,0.00010626095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012118401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062484494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050366092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013090351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004456865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54919106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098775316","doi":"10.1071/wr04111","title":"Mortality and survivorship of the quokka (Setonix brachyurus) (Macropodidae : Marsupialia) in the northern jarrah forest of Western Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Survivorship curve; Biology; Threatened species; Population; Juvenile; Ecology; Predation; Demography; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.12154441869221905,"score_gpt":0.3697939848967447,"score_spread":0.24824956620452565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098775316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921565,0.000021880243,0.0000037219716,0.006564185,0.000046353918,0.00042250054,0.000013391589,0.000004892256,0.00076656503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870235,0.00002010698,0.00002674352,0.0003450398,0.000052085274,0.000027395685,0.0000030951421,0.000008307272,0.0008148737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725187,0.0009587954,0.00035706014,0.00026562923,0.00078016025,0.00038647142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881136,0.0004473773,0.00011200039,0.0005391148,0.000033688044,0.000056466866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031964614,0.00011061627,0.0001736195,0.000052457126,0.0001781888,0.00002168323,0.00071704853,0.0001255557,0.00022630076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026103324,0.00007131317,0.00005411624,0.00055788667,0.0012209875,0.00018323885,0.00031247985,0.00043803643,0.000073140734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033458666,0.00012910803,0.9967188,0.000019363732,0.0000097636075,0.0000018173375,0.0010081459,0.0002505771,0.00010091976,0.00020257938,0.00094260636,0.0005828443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002477238,0.00005553402,0.99686867,0.000019953834,0.0000069202792,0.000004027489,0.0003030609,0.00015074587,0.000050594383,0.0006016794,0.0016199371,0.00007113249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020502541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33292553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31242296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008128467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000470255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100531623","doi":"10.1071/wr14069","title":"Using novel spatial mark–resight techniques to monitor resident Canada geese in a suburban environment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; North Carolina Department of Transportation; North Carolina State University","keywords":"Goose; Geography; Context (archaeology); Waterfowl; Population; Wildlife management; Wildlife; Flyway; Range (aeronautics); Branta; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Habitat; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08906570813751805,"score_gpt":0.32867245969574865,"score_spread":0.2396067515582306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100531623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902098,0.000025579757,0.0007081754,0.0060840826,0.00011724374,0.00074241013,0.000009523727,0.000023465878,0.0020796782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932822,0.000010783271,0.0039256467,0.0011343573,0.000167642,0.00014946851,0.0000061331893,0.000024443665,0.0012993107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968061,0.00034645124,0.00032148394,0.0004982555,0.0013121846,0.00071555073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892074,0.00015032798,0.000046757257,0.00042470198,0.000028654198,0.0004288027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020314849,0.00015874587,0.00018070904,0.00017002465,0.00019080519,0.000039115275,0.00045367167,0.00013083083,0.0005546845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034604198,0.00015952493,0.000023752578,0.00047983363,0.0001940306,0.00018986825,0.0005902714,0.00042093487,0.00023266675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014459266,0.000114000264,0.9277599,0.000004860041,0.0000060307702,0.000064724394,0.00029580246,0.0013086869,0.0022366345,0.000028182363,0.06678197,0.0012546123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004834967,0.00018637367,0.9073837,0.000039697956,0.0000043626287,0.000011521819,0.00036380658,0.0019208229,0.0011621845,0.00024085965,0.08790144,0.0003017789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81239814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66116035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15123782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002991109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004169013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7821646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103538233","doi":"10.1071/wr01074","title":"Beyond population regulation and limitation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Population growth; Population size; Density dependence; Population density; Ecology; Empirical research; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0936369518061008,"score_gpt":0.34264733844678125,"score_spread":0.24901038664068045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103538233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815031,0.00006983845,0.000011979966,0.0018071386,0.000019169778,0.00012625317,6.9648945e-7,0.000018315382,0.016443456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963621,0.000085798056,0.00027694335,0.000090839785,0.000028941331,0.000015445283,0.000005008809,0.0000044896606,0.0031304653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991935,0.00009248485,0.00008361761,0.00017198459,0.0002762974,0.0001821381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999764,0.00008522424,0.00001714313,0.000077052544,0.000011933585,0.000044637178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040023762,0.00004431869,0.00005305011,0.000042100877,0.00036608108,0.000016832058,0.00004808943,0.00005449474,0.0014526489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000920131,0.000040394276,0.000010501484,0.00018764714,0.00020337116,0.0001763368,0.0001026674,0.00011778158,0.0009117161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005274422,0.000035696856,0.9654134,0.0000023007535,0.0000018153103,0.0000013719383,0.00032379432,0.00001754605,0.0004632419,0.0007240706,0.017954309,0.015057163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009059423,0.00007014611,0.9934534,0.0000022831882,0.000002672007,0.0000023357384,0.0000776879,0.0012331695,0.000008758792,0.0020111774,0.0030015975,0.000046167577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011487653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013955173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028039994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000693331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.4246216e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105578339","doi":"10.1071/wr08109","title":"DNA genotypes reveal red fox (Vulpes vulpes) abundance, response to lethal control and limitations of contemporary survey techniques","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Rabies epidemiology and control","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Vulpes; Transect; Biology; Population; Genotyping; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Abundance (ecology); Veterinary medicine; Zoology; Genotype; Demography; Genetics; Medicine","score_opus":0.11279827769070393,"score_gpt":0.3636689807068016,"score_spread":0.25087070301609765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105578339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.954546,0.00860481,0.00062504446,0.029941643,0.00015345715,0.0014521374,0.00021078027,0.00014254077,0.004323583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496174,0.00031377721,0.0003107723,0.0017910055,0.00004394299,0.00010286498,0.000058565554,0.000018593302,0.0023987505],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907428,0.007218758,0.0006639946,0.0005394876,0.00013304173,0.00070192106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98766834,0.010980897,0.00014664067,0.0005381429,0.0005778978,0.00008806484],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010937803,0.00022354335,0.00071660284,0.00049617677,0.00040919686,0.00002013188,0.0004346479,0.00049312593,0.00002713316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012847847,0.00019911274,0.00009515496,0.0004482082,0.0008683587,0.00013439367,0.00009306203,0.00076440466,0.00009414846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030155411,0.0003561076,0.043422356,0.000029325536,0.00039352776,0.00003624349,0.0010901837,0.0000042133374,0.7342314,0.0032459225,0.1454934,0.041541897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003022808,0.003188507,0.8546913,0.00012200178,0.000024878156,0.000055861314,0.0002824315,0.000008813952,0.010941511,0.0024334735,0.12487223,0.00035613147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031016092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008113498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.811269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048320926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033469274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99546736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105873807","doi":"10.1071/wr09046","title":"Predator-baiting experiments for the conservation of rock-wallabies in Western Australia: a 25-year review with recent advances","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Marsupial; Biology; Endangered species; Ecology; Predator; Threatened species; Wildlife management; Fauna; Wildlife; Habitat","score_opus":0.17208974208478117,"score_gpt":0.43479119180527215,"score_spread":0.262701449720491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105873807","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001237386,0.9924841,0.000026102944,0.0019197189,0.00010540703,0.0039619817,0.000031188363,0.000014848505,0.0002192916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000764745,0.9962804,0.0003064918,0.0003327483,0.00007648725,0.0019926087,0.00006590521,0.000034425146,0.0008345005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684376,0.0005655704,0.0007694299,0.000540571,0.00074608915,0.0005345915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975023,0.0012719524,0.00045225504,0.000579852,0.00011505458,0.000078583056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002964948,0.00028393784,0.00086332374,0.00010540196,0.00024317425,0.0000346972,0.0007365925,0.00029333972,0.00044774276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007488722,0.00018116111,0.00011719693,0.0008475715,0.00039215348,0.00029500466,0.00026294964,0.0008829863,0.00013363043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113844704,0.00027774394,0.19867416,0.024932055,0.00012939649,0.000007510639,0.00025614747,0.000022493026,0.0000026918415,0.0001670958,0.019582506,0.75583434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025827286,0.00014492555,0.0036057094,0.012162215,0.00009270838,0.000007761459,0.00006700911,0.000010524479,0.0000015959804,0.0000306112,0.98343325,0.00018540847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016841727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096787023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96385074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022993589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002380358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7387536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106156459","doi":"10.1071/wr13209","title":"Fertilisation, cattle grazing and voles: collapse of meadow vole populations in young forests?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Population cycle; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Grazing; Microtus; Biology; Population; Vole; Vegetation (pathology); Understory; Demography","score_opus":0.20133025131306745,"score_gpt":0.40250287797484363,"score_spread":0.20117262666177618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106156459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963829,0.00012447387,0.000021058111,0.0007464604,0.000035789235,0.00018550217,0.0000035729308,0.000008056191,0.0024922045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910456,0.000011261408,0.0002678631,0.000015371812,0.000011563599,0.000031317853,0.0000032046587,0.0000056729714,0.0005491936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989429,0.00011956757,0.00016424395,0.0001799395,0.0003452537,0.00024810538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965537,0.00006679895,0.000027892584,0.00011726517,0.000044074994,0.000088599474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009635443,0.000058365862,0.000113008085,0.000085151696,0.00015746326,0.0000107076985,0.00010995425,0.00005769198,0.00006526336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036702017,0.000053010866,0.00001367471,0.00038769853,0.00052725157,0.00013854721,0.00023634668,0.00014355176,0.00006782191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024432307,0.00006237424,0.9932763,0.0000044230455,0.0000018308789,0.0000018701643,0.001081948,0.00011638012,0.00017700912,0.00021273788,0.0047275694,0.00031309735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024161227,0.00008764341,0.9963409,0.000010946649,0.0000031769182,0.0000023169082,0.0012908882,0.00026986512,0.00003076258,0.0013264229,0.00034271696,0.000052761017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029935052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049690723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046697218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014820363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003156601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96764994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108997345","doi":"10.1071/wr08069","title":"Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Vulpes; Transect; Wildlife; Biology; Wildlife management; Zoology; Marten; Wildlife conservation; Microsatellite; Ecology; Habitat; Predation","score_opus":0.20089697103327792,"score_gpt":0.47911234609686865,"score_spread":0.27821537506359073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108997345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99411136,0.000105219944,0.0018365576,0.0023940995,0.000038191396,0.0008897628,0.0000013489396,0.000017425642,0.0006060328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991169,0.000008193009,0.0081238,0.00043228237,0.00003636582,0.000026486696,4.315978e-7,0.000008656073,0.00019479977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702907,0.001402123,0.00033030726,0.00036702835,0.0004637016,0.00040777543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984773,0.0008540199,0.00007155577,0.0004333647,0.000047511876,0.00011624662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034729843,0.0001241067,0.00025624834,0.0001183318,0.00061631267,0.000051551364,0.00031701662,0.000080349164,0.00027365165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068692194,0.00009296763,0.000036153277,0.00084473554,0.00034340666,0.00013971663,0.00030163597,0.0003623974,0.000027804908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015335776,0.00029111502,0.954342,0.00000982985,0.000029221268,0.00014614777,0.008018361,0.00084962556,0.0048555285,0.000030143026,0.0038414607,0.027433181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054221356,0.0015677729,0.96322834,0.000027258222,0.00003580943,0.00018938356,0.021106852,0.0090803895,0.00055865117,0.00065650605,0.0028110151,0.0001958304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075466075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033437813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02723735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013005326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036915557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47402412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112507765","doi":"10.1071/wr11009","title":"Is the relationship between predator and prey abundances related to climate for lynx and snowshoe hares?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Department of Environment; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Canberra; Australian Academy of Science","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Context (archaeology); Snowshoe hare; Apex predator; Climate change; Biology; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.15749239556295644,"score_gpt":0.3651719144881467,"score_spread":0.20767951892519024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112507765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98735887,0.00007288187,0.000037244903,0.009089142,0.00003560067,0.0008754224,0.000034360517,0.000025909221,0.002470597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690956,0.00004897103,0.00070917426,0.0008148803,0.00003287713,0.00020629214,0.000008507759,0.000013115446,0.001256606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985087,0.0002279476,0.0002060795,0.0003686546,0.0002723907,0.00041621822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982218,0.0012858761,0.00004516596,0.00026498627,0.000028949586,0.00015318795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021643224,0.000094756855,0.00010972031,0.000060275688,0.0008645412,0.000053363106,0.00024206564,0.00012612945,0.0002776477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008353835,0.00007148308,0.000022364939,0.00031856098,0.00049653306,0.00027939279,0.0003174776,0.0002635904,0.00024873987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005470732,0.00001569022,0.9824779,0.000015098363,0.0000106943135,5.14368e-7,0.0021629643,9.3667165e-7,0.000008034469,0.001351483,0.012919061,0.0009829224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022655081,0.00015094063,0.9835851,0.000021148508,0.000010638958,0.0000022997535,0.00023350114,0.000098815835,0.000023089986,0.008522095,0.00703715,0.000088644476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012448781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014648783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009550734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043460954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002211386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66494393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114892621","doi":"10.1071/wr07055","title":"The projected distributions of Mastacomys fuscus and Rattus lutreolus in south-eastern Australia under a scenario of climate change: potential for increased competition?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Ecology; Altitude (triangle); Range (aeronautics); Competition (biology); Geography; Global warming; Fauna; Biology","score_opus":0.12333928947855564,"score_gpt":0.35372805928476847,"score_spread":0.2303887698062128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114892621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99612236,0.000062363724,0.00013013316,0.0011525688,0.000041015745,0.0009143742,0.0010230143,0.000012474851,0.00054168946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990704,0.00034210103,0.00003773509,0.00002203475,0.000029403816,0.00017295586,0.00016900027,0.000009168856,0.00014717084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812824,0.00021186125,0.00031489308,0.0002505753,0.0005422836,0.000552146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993055,0.00014869132,0.000094061106,0.00023961542,0.000091962196,0.00012017352],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007376282,0.00011214417,0.00018573721,0.00007793871,0.0004241061,0.000026925973,0.00022299787,0.00007545151,0.0011163754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009912128,0.0000874109,0.00006301266,0.00055943214,0.0011686825,0.000099914665,0.0002783474,0.00018710736,0.00004912649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009464906,0.00081118185,0.9779463,0.00018643867,0.00003979031,0.0000217649,0.0019460238,0.00003068224,0.0047743395,0.009761546,0.0028282164,0.0007072596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016426418,0.00018840123,0.99172646,0.00004912618,0.00001023402,0.0000151146705,0.0032675853,0.0007436135,0.00024646468,0.00017955914,0.0018034606,0.00012736974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017755607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014058138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013780162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024488592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036206813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116704660","doi":"10.1071/wr12185","title":"Using human-dimensions research to reduce implementation uncertainty for wildlife management: a case of moose (Alces alces) hunting in northern Ontario, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Wildlife; Wildlife management; Hunting season; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Population; Context (archaeology); Overexploitation; Population density; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Fishery; Demography; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11272193741117044,"score_gpt":0.4042986427010204,"score_spread":0.29157670528984997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116704660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992476,0.000010655885,0.000025175634,0.0033220593,0.00007697433,0.0027805327,0.00001585211,0.0000137859315,0.0012789511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586886,0.000004022635,0.0017867722,0.00072595605,0.000054683856,0.0007036119,0.000034939654,0.000030095303,0.00079107104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569786,0.00064311933,0.00066154153,0.0006898636,0.001097644,0.0012099936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981695,0.0006400211,0.00012437643,0.0005066699,0.00028697026,0.00027246],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00419147,0.00018996037,0.00026983744,0.0004614647,0.0011267446,0.000073573516,0.00048761454,0.0001147474,0.001202812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025237864,0.00019829208,0.00005382977,0.0014837403,0.00030742786,0.00042248084,0.00065576186,0.0005275498,0.00007063262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006854417,0.00014008519,0.9501977,0.00005391785,0.000038612572,0.00011219719,0.0017398701,0.0070373174,0.0012125762,0.00033171623,0.035640694,0.003426803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021420969,0.00042009176,0.9492871,0.00019483462,0.000029171046,0.0000597417,0.022476712,0.00470085,0.00032454854,0.0022224851,0.017576864,0.00056548824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020736843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025731823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006476079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116975893","doi":"10.1071/wr13058","title":"Characteristics of refugia used by the threatened Australian growling grass frog (Litoria raniformis) during a prolonged drought","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Riparian zone; Occupancy; Ecology; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Lake ecosystem; River ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.032731389839839684,"score_gpt":0.29682683056002607,"score_spread":0.26409544072018637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116975893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956721,0.000028432449,0.000005645711,0.0022986212,0.00017503487,0.0007053985,0.000015888474,0.000030402976,0.0010684904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99425477,0.00007566553,0.000091123715,0.000044427343,0.00024000992,0.00010210635,0.000018390376,0.000023312623,0.005150216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974533,0.00035823387,0.00037668305,0.00039054124,0.00069228566,0.00072900456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989916,0.00015372077,0.000115233255,0.00050636334,0.000047450085,0.00018563066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010775473,0.00016314785,0.00025564895,0.000048449554,0.0003646958,0.000059151796,0.0006262452,0.00019101983,0.0011874448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001403692,0.00010217918,0.00008062197,0.00035824566,0.00083241623,0.00019176936,0.00033516964,0.00048089592,0.00088715163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012395288,0.0001544681,0.7356961,0.000061189596,0.00004811759,0.000011041157,0.0008498966,0.0000035804742,0.24392074,0.00007367449,0.017123133,0.0019341317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010486089,0.0002462671,0.96565765,0.00006584096,0.0000148836425,0.00002293495,0.0004928482,0.00017948858,0.010571698,0.00032733486,0.02105255,0.0003199234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011996082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005749724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23334904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001610393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027411534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122140032","doi":"10.1071/wr08086","title":"Small mammal populations in a eucalypt forest affected by fire and drought. I. Long-term patterns in an era of climate change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; Ian Potter Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Fauna; Mammal; Population; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Biodiversity; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.09262782879171857,"score_gpt":0.3444392687688883,"score_spread":0.2518114399771697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122140032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955613,0.00005144397,0.000010103375,0.0036673166,0.000021492458,0.0005175905,0.000019042613,0.000014580522,0.00013711101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903494,0.00019401318,0.000102962935,0.00044363993,0.000033641267,0.00007207988,0.00008009377,0.000009119302,0.000029481691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982989,0.00034484154,0.00026145007,0.00033166123,0.00026854372,0.0004946177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995231,0.000081411155,0.000049961145,0.00022260798,0.000014485649,0.00010845206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008098721,0.00010707862,0.00016492805,0.00010865816,0.000112446585,0.000025070858,0.00019652046,0.00014465293,0.00014472252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006940813,0.000108239685,0.000019924382,0.00052889175,0.00015169555,0.00035977646,0.00012741867,0.00041130887,0.000022980841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004878987,0.00033407955,0.98258185,0.000016129792,0.0000012714468,0.000023728388,0.000434216,0.000023158067,0.000110540015,0.00007870244,0.00013630593,0.01621122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005146988,0.00028174563,0.9959237,0.00007558665,0.0000021222818,0.0000036255663,0.00004453563,0.0027740162,0.0000059232248,0.0002585591,0.000012655787,0.000102861486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021854492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039323773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037138324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010886836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013060014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97820604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122227317","doi":"10.1071/wr11175","title":"Detection and stratification approaches for aerial surveys of deer in prairie–parklands","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Prion Research Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wildlife; Aerial survey; Survey methodology; Population; Odocoileus; Sampling (signal processing); Geography; Statistics; Wildlife management; Sampling design; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Cartography; Mathematics; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.12990901836553595,"score_gpt":0.33314491318833167,"score_spread":0.20323589482279572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122227317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962235,0.000024771909,0.0018592553,0.0006312522,0.000060453985,0.00041816593,0.000003258576,0.0000065723534,0.00077277975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992456,0.0000071291443,0.000348645,0.000021221873,0.000075971955,0.00014841452,0.000011018808,0.000005780386,0.00013623372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987428,0.00046669692,0.00016297142,0.0001555637,0.00020308037,0.00026885458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994513,0.0003165654,0.000041166866,0.00011578805,0.000017161217,0.00005801014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050053243,0.000052413132,0.00008406477,0.00006834201,0.00010428873,0.0000110610645,0.000076250355,0.000101800775,0.000046855574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003513705,0.000049680544,0.000014113893,0.00025150407,0.00021803116,0.0002799976,0.000049590082,0.000121834586,0.00001580824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006217339,0.000088467845,0.9867099,0.000013465623,0.000003242436,4.8695195e-8,0.0002834058,0.000030307996,0.0010692251,0.00029877006,0.00041066506,0.011030305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003071668,0.00008193061,0.995823,0.0000034523532,0.0000021179324,0.0000011763269,0.00014727778,0.0016371999,0.00047813228,0.00056798273,0.00089993037,0.00005061801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002397007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012273188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010979688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058818572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018351338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20259139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124739769","doi":"10.1071/wr12168","title":"Seasons of the ringed seal: pelagic open-water hyperphagy, benthic feeding over winter and spring fasting during molt","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nunavut Wildlife Management Board; ArcticNet","keywords":"Phoca; Blubber; Pelagic zone; Biology; Foraging; Context (archaeology); Arctic; Benthic zone; Bay; Seasonality; δ13C; Ecology; Fishery; Oceanography; Stable isotope ratio","score_opus":0.05484123731665384,"score_gpt":0.3139490860243298,"score_spread":0.25910784870767595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124739769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97729415,0.00010586111,0.0000014033064,0.0024201747,0.00004246491,0.00069948786,0.0000019453714,0.000017881035,0.019416628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806726,0.00010659603,0.00014009284,0.0001669694,0.000060005037,0.00006088452,3.0293754e-7,0.000028665736,0.0013692442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749213,0.00021831543,0.0002336817,0.0004513063,0.00085440336,0.00075017766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992066,0.000147106,0.00005511329,0.00039065233,0.000042229,0.00015828846],"candidate_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013151976,0.00016233273,0.00022504758,0.00004891327,0.00067611225,0.00020114938,0.00089104206,0.00005740128,0.0026615148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025557337,0.000103666425,0.00006129146,0.00032543548,0.00042756842,0.00047219935,0.010305848,0.00052898173,0.00025629895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011925244,0.000034634773,0.9804605,0.00009160606,0.000023483528,0.000003380002,0.00043859938,0.000037565063,0.016625442,0.00003634468,0.0012005278,0.0010359815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034299475,0.000035946643,0.99404305,0.00014803505,0.0000072362755,0.0000072554953,0.00028087554,0.0006062098,0.0019839848,0.00007174787,0.002336356,0.00013629816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073827337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018702201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020773085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019142439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011201869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126376142","doi":"10.1071/wr06171","title":"Evaluation of predator numerical responses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Yukon Department of Environment; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Canberra","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Numerical response; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Population; Density dependence; Snowshoe hare; Population density; Trophic level; Functional response; Demography","score_opus":0.12652112001233626,"score_gpt":0.41181542270881555,"score_spread":0.28529430269647926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126376142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819751,0.00003791946,0.0004154056,0.0010429216,0.000064210464,0.00030515116,0.0000021486453,0.000017081586,0.016140113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864256,0.0000073220917,0.00047576003,0.00020382734,0.000053655167,0.000024890356,0.0000033674805,0.0000073327947,0.000581302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624956,0.00091331586,0.00023805123,0.00023343122,0.0020062148,0.0003594538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872816,0.00068207947,0.000050935952,0.00027158612,0.00016769083,0.00009956167],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022325577,0.000060133632,0.000091148,0.00010406982,0.00015729242,0.000008473222,0.00022610047,0.00009865324,0.002781896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024660546,0.00005624799,0.000030220599,0.00061563693,0.00035369775,0.00015368432,0.00015359274,0.00021611685,0.00075724337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020362031,0.00011744167,0.9622426,0.0000027900364,0.000010118733,0.000002632122,0.00015780497,0.000099437326,0.0009171851,0.0002149217,0.017626865,0.01840459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029985342,0.00014498613,0.99017483,0.000006326419,0.000011619094,0.000003461827,0.00012855102,0.0020760384,0.00048341244,0.0011610052,0.005450268,0.000059677237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019403911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010310978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027932206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025684226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001319007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126725199","doi":"10.1071/wr09006","title":"The transmission rate of MCMV in house mice in pens: implications for virally vectored immunocontraception","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Grains Research and Development Corporation","keywords":"Transmission (telecommunications); Strain (injury); Biology; House mice; Transmission rate; Outbreak; Virology; Veterinary medicine; House mouse; Horizontal transmission; Zoology; Virus; Anatomy","score_opus":0.06271237663927479,"score_gpt":0.38454221982569475,"score_spread":0.32182984318641994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126725199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878863,0.00018444879,0.000054502056,0.010875214,0.000010105188,0.00065118953,0.0000030826845,0.0000097591355,0.00032541252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902093,0.00041187133,0.00018605721,0.00008813836,0.000008019916,0.00012810454,0.0000014184265,0.000005554063,0.0001499279],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989512,0.0002446304,0.00020775729,0.00017624714,0.00010773533,0.00031245739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993561,0.00042854607,0.000029919067,0.00013554668,0.00002075396,0.000029119827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018646602,0.000058184673,0.00010581608,0.00005232406,0.00030634922,0.000010327475,0.00022754387,0.00006644003,0.00002636696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015426891,0.000042152275,0.00003540527,0.00031242173,0.0002587186,0.00007561834,0.000038520284,0.00024162879,0.000022513057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007712699,0.00055515056,0.37740234,0.00000935904,0.0000053170884,0.000001721726,0.0019024165,0.00015257529,0.5584926,0.00091478653,0.0024207237,0.057371728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043630356,0.0002515611,0.9937808,0.00001243338,0.000002041816,5.332422e-7,0.00026840562,0.000075123535,0.00041110755,0.0017056956,0.0030097263,0.000046288693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027258619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012141074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6163784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012385263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021983418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23562215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127007647","doi":"10.1071/wr09060","title":"Predicting the ecological impact of cane toads (Bufo marinus) on threatened camaenid land snails in north-western Australia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Threatened species; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Introduced species","score_opus":0.078420037191881,"score_gpt":0.37432857750993626,"score_spread":0.29590854031805525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127007647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99559313,0.000010720354,5.515412e-7,0.0009896402,0.000030577074,0.00033860578,0.0000115560415,0.000013137615,0.0030120823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998436,0.000039199014,0.000012517606,0.000128558,0.00007662558,0.000011140114,0.000007674699,0.000006094112,0.0012822408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979639,0.0003583746,0.00025081885,0.0003283355,0.0004684168,0.00063014077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992142,0.00024048434,0.000053108546,0.0003327808,0.000014757587,0.00014468138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097377837,0.00012860142,0.00020678023,0.000072426425,0.000121571,0.00002180213,0.0004307762,0.00014882101,0.0008885552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014325915,0.00006977751,0.00007922786,0.00041738298,0.0004732345,0.000058483747,0.00018626083,0.0004930055,0.0002177544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012566648,0.00014966766,0.9948697,0.0000024418116,0.00000793978,0.000041429088,0.00021894433,0.00096442655,0.0005795593,0.000007368055,0.0010416163,0.0019912128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031012023,0.001151504,0.99788946,0.000012392579,0.0000020398638,0.000013313107,0.000044108783,0.00015366527,0.000054596672,0.00005465516,0.00023609865,0.000078026445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007890332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012844208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004953876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031914018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004197673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128769951","doi":"10.1071/wr11079","title":"Efficacy of SpayVac® is excellent: a comment on Gray et al. (2010)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Immunovaccine (Canada); ASL Environmental Sciences (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Liposome; Gray (unit); Zona pellucida; Virology; Biology; Zoology; Medicine; Fishery","score_opus":0.10111081863496167,"score_gpt":0.3887171038299361,"score_spread":0.2876062851949744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128769951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8707474,0.0008251898,0.0066338293,0.0675692,0.00013494822,0.0021174864,0.00014256082,0.00007390669,0.051755477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707989,0.0013558842,0.0021521258,0.024515409,0.000041304473,0.00016628715,0.0001137649,0.000030664763,0.00082566915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860805,0.00020883318,0.00020202003,0.00039793862,0.00025783348,0.00032531982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885017,0.000033539498,0.00005531944,0.0008023634,0.00014927158,0.00010934344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079203397,0.00012259175,0.00013291393,0.00009511082,0.00009514042,0.000007760026,0.0003998525,0.00014221223,0.00013640503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007460366,0.000105644875,0.00010319365,0.00015012958,0.00023217792,0.0000013592698,0.00026786324,0.00025156265,0.00005878458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023890828,0.0007622812,0.0022254547,0.000013492251,0.00006700094,0.0000035957257,0.00013621918,7.739762e-7,0.15748397,0.006083061,0.8307465,0.0022387751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040822517,0.0007437047,0.0026611993,0.000021071846,0.0000041950266,0.0000033637073,0.000025731539,0.000007202373,0.24393441,0.00032628854,0.7517528,0.000111822425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016308013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052733444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100051485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011244423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067827605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4308073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132388284","doi":"10.1071/wr10177","title":"A review of the effects of different marking and tagging techniques on marine mammals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Aquarium; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Wildlife; Biology; Ecology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.08217227647345204,"score_gpt":0.3731076315736664,"score_spread":0.29093535510021434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132388284","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006479016,0.96901816,3.2293133e-7,0.000078127385,0.000036412494,0.0024857584,0.000005141737,0.000013969344,0.0282973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000035491255,0.9988366,0.0000723248,0.00026987412,0.00003731886,0.00029994056,0.0000023307643,0.000039039063,0.00040709655],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964607,0.0011047904,0.00065459975,0.0004847987,0.00085356587,0.00044157926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976276,0.001030847,0.0004086016,0.000809918,0.00003227586,0.00009073603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020288923,0.00033818337,0.0015698132,0.00010095459,0.00012911427,0.0000103747325,0.00090743945,0.00012697477,0.0006354011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010927343,0.00018665026,0.0003415188,0.0006395525,0.00054654485,0.00003605509,0.005654646,0.000707334,0.000029092993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031066868,0.00005541858,0.0012220793,0.22535215,0.00004199064,0.0000024031362,0.000009172401,8.102238e-10,9.739147e-7,0.00012408075,0.0054030097,0.7677856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034384393,0.00017399163,0.0016869372,0.20810603,0.00011579736,0.00000586876,0.0000010403785,1.6325853e-7,0.000011751355,0.00006624355,0.7896702,0.00012758424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009436146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007685802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7842672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020373972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031365962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76113766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133607498","doi":"10.1071/wr15064","title":"Mixed stock analysis of a resident green turtle, Chelonia mydas, population in New Caledonia links rookeries in the South Pacific","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"New Zealand Aid Programme; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Marine Fisheries Service; Griffith University","keywords":"Rookery; Fishery; Foraging; Population; mtDNA control region; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Sea turtle; Turtle (robot); Demography","score_opus":0.12759678863397536,"score_gpt":0.3395149088406152,"score_spread":0.21191812020663983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133607498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99549896,0.00011869773,0.000027471728,0.0035184752,0.000025051791,0.00028044853,0.00000462179,0.000007900026,0.0005183711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985271,0.000013275863,0.000107599015,0.00010579464,0.000031344305,0.00002344882,0.000034991757,0.000005372784,0.0011510743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770755,0.00075330056,0.00030351148,0.00027161196,0.00066274137,0.00030128172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992974,0.00017284545,0.000069102905,0.0003502348,0.00002625524,0.000084155494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026527182,0.000088078945,0.00019375252,0.00031095758,0.00006728569,0.000026645155,0.00034720293,0.00019344896,0.000105765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003185862,0.00006461087,0.000049940016,0.0021686575,0.00019929896,0.00015839977,0.00013882334,0.00046631662,0.00006221144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010822767,0.000032323915,0.9892643,0.000003819357,0.00001942715,0.0000050422314,0.0066050193,0.0006263582,0.00007481897,0.00011505112,0.0014933853,0.0016522235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002791125,0.00006481688,0.993215,0.000012788291,0.00001811758,6.2661775e-7,0.0025232688,0.0018072068,0.000013600207,0.0009100674,0.0010857543,0.00006958755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053613897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06715789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013543986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002016254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009371193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95268816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135771269","doi":"10.1071/wr07082","title":"Differential space use inferred from live trapping versus telemetry: northern flying squirrels and fine spatial grain","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; Government of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Telemetry; Wildlife; Home range; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Sampling (signal processing); Trap (plumbing); Wildlife management; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14036601391546868,"score_gpt":0.3405596206132572,"score_spread":0.2001936066977885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135771269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982472,0.000055409677,0.00020966558,0.0006225161,0.00015507556,0.00027330738,0.0000246198,0.000038849448,0.0003733576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988884,0.0002031391,0.0002096287,0.000031655953,0.00014117903,0.00003240127,0.000015328722,0.000018094357,0.00046021724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979146,0.00023715427,0.00018866247,0.00048033954,0.0005887776,0.00059047976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899685,0.0005551686,0.00004452387,0.0002079367,0.000027743423,0.000167792],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027032476,0.00017227151,0.00024178921,0.00007977755,0.0010902063,0.000043608386,0.00021106328,0.00013190818,0.0013791104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033893378,0.00015454605,0.00005366883,0.00025356968,0.0010646044,0.00021957954,0.00065279246,0.00049312616,0.00037494098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034919698,0.00011925046,0.9830422,0.000003087517,0.00003837951,0.00008987392,0.001997277,0.0000073776705,0.0026278067,0.000008448264,0.0016580647,0.01005908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012534448,0.00032545254,0.99503076,0.000011939034,0.00001717122,0.0000050761732,0.0004419203,0.00037290453,0.00011095115,0.00003327108,0.0022140613,0.00018303543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013757971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018623924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011988615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001413718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002835786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136663220","doi":"10.1071/wr07053","title":"Philopatry and site fidelity of New Zealand sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Philopatry; Biological dispersal; Threatened species; Ecology; Biology; Population; Habitat; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.08509229325081591,"score_gpt":0.33109241491592145,"score_spread":0.24600012166510554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136663220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98295975,0.00063695305,0.000005510018,0.0019413133,0.000017464794,0.00024617472,0.0000148756535,0.000020096642,0.014157881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894475,0.0049475003,0.00042775174,0.00034094104,0.000091417016,0.000011892307,0.0000044455555,0.000014783083,0.004713801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979702,0.00014411256,0.00023127187,0.00035493416,0.0008439933,0.00045546173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999147,0.00015168733,0.000042220607,0.000339739,0.00003179544,0.0002875453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007117675,0.000117733005,0.00021938664,0.000054169504,0.00030300414,0.0000134082375,0.0002474264,0.000057516063,0.0015195102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023559695,0.00010342559,0.000050186718,0.00053333037,0.00062010105,0.00013148093,0.0013014511,0.00030240233,0.00041673463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002943766,0.000045470348,0.84793633,0.000023028464,0.000008772553,0.000015461565,0.00037551654,0.0000070472115,0.00021786802,0.000009631475,0.14757678,0.003754668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002806518,0.000139979,0.8647415,0.000020874762,0.000003953431,0.000019251978,0.00003398875,0.000055558216,0.000057614532,0.00025181912,0.1342974,0.00009737577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0190023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028249512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016805215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009675328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005783961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140691215","doi":"10.1071/wr08079","title":"Combining a map-based public survey with an estimation of site occupancy to determine the recent and changing distribution of the koala in New South Wales","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phascolarctos cinereus; Occupancy; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Wildlife management; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Fauna; Conservation biology; Species distribution; Scale (ratio); Biodiversity; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Biology; Population; Environmental science","score_opus":0.0759408815929056,"score_gpt":0.31717118302884534,"score_spread":0.24123030143593974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140691215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989916,0.000009570175,0.0010048241,0.008650415,0.000012557999,0.00036261347,0.000012873251,0.0000056957956,0.00002540957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993478,0.0000033076888,0.00021806722,0.0003430472,0.000007447728,0.000009569411,0.00003964772,0.0000037172124,0.00002736389],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849844,0.00052232464,0.00017424722,0.00017517457,0.00037140312,0.00025843704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931574,0.0002546221,0.000074503136,0.00024506426,0.000040624887,0.00006943813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023667645,0.00006426703,0.000101714846,0.000075335854,0.00017294429,0.000022873504,0.00019944874,0.000044692988,0.000026133399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052010396,0.000041238553,0.000011322174,0.0009957023,0.00019672132,0.00014761665,0.00008710952,0.00015468462,0.0000047866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011447264,0.00005593002,0.9826736,0.0000047048648,0.0000015648901,4.3309728e-7,0.00071721215,0.0011053991,0.000080429505,0.00007305789,0.0001365388,0.015036697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003182189,0.00025378604,0.9825393,0.000046029483,0.0000022779943,8.009976e-7,0.000117700416,0.016367728,0.00010668059,0.00014156758,0.000059648544,0.00004624917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069736806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030658322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015262328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007348356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094839634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17108063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141667431","doi":"10.1071/wr11076","title":"Winter severity index using widely available weather information","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Cryospheric studies and observations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Society of Professional Biologists","keywords":"Snowpack; Snow; Environmental science; Climate change; Context (archaeology); Physical geography; Weather station; Spatial ecology; Index (typography); Climatology; Geography; Ecology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.12088871767965768,"score_gpt":0.32309697322742587,"score_spread":0.20220825554776817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141667431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726727,0.0008463411,0.0005981862,0.001153488,0.0003979595,0.00025342146,0.000036290974,0.000048364822,0.02399322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586326,0.00012107295,0.001080752,0.0012387151,0.00034818685,0.000002397348,0.000034392804,0.0000035410596,0.001307658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985208,0.00009141616,0.00017702125,0.00009799837,0.0005344259,0.00057835603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993259,0.00014697564,0.000033856453,0.00018324278,0.00015280409,0.00015724063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011015532,0.000080075384,0.00009978461,0.000063570085,0.00045701655,0.00009957747,0.00015960982,0.000057950037,0.006761014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015022703,0.00006492528,0.000035413854,0.00049042184,0.00010310671,0.0012224374,0.000046172605,0.00023736521,0.0025393215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014264518,0.000010702415,0.92655736,0.0000099672725,0.000011467504,3.4413583e-7,0.00046250623,0.00021978973,0.0000013913996,0.000013819326,0.06634586,0.00635255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008306592,0.000016405405,0.6182606,0.00000980029,0.00000196159,0.0000028117024,0.00052235555,0.008020672,0.0000015721307,0.000036165635,0.37297916,0.000065385306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005171656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047440795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30829668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002026662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056313387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142250007","doi":"10.1071/wr07081","title":"Some human, aircraft and animal factors affecting aerial surveys: how to enumerate animals from the air","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fleming College","funders":"","keywords":"Aerial survey; Wildlife; Salience (neuroscience); Dingo; Aerial imagery; Enumeration; Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Remote sensing; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08267940010888417,"score_gpt":0.31815796765131427,"score_spread":0.2354785675424301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142250007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98978096,0.00006306178,0.000018441728,0.009316292,0.00011525561,0.00046251464,0.000021451713,0.000049257782,0.00017274189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789923,0.000036249756,0.00009968563,0.0009164696,0.00051296776,0.000032685897,0.000013983209,0.000021303775,0.0004674364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651724,0.0015284453,0.00017800448,0.00052277814,0.0006299142,0.0006236057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981509,0.0012323135,0.00005007313,0.00032430736,0.000032629632,0.00020978398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028393657,0.0001691976,0.00019686796,0.00005801147,0.0016431897,0.00008063738,0.00040591383,0.00013967024,0.00034437614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007773332,0.00012838458,0.00004392568,0.0004204054,0.0006073639,0.0003624765,0.0005422796,0.00047527434,0.00034689467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040149996,0.000033530447,0.9682222,0.0000019114648,0.0000152901,0.000015877267,0.001411096,0.000018085853,0.0064748023,0.00003974831,0.02357035,0.00015693672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027882255,0.0002499653,0.995167,0.000009117047,0.000003866266,0.000005495917,0.00046780478,0.00003721162,0.0005074829,0.00021337882,0.002907202,0.00015266462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043001003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013731513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026944766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012412168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004502694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143622175","doi":"10.1071/wr10077","title":"An evaluation of hot-iron branding as a permanent marking method for adult New Zealand sea lions, Phocarctos hookeri","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Population; Demography; Biology; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.16032302953508115,"score_gpt":0.41867695689658063,"score_spread":0.2583539273614995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143622175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709754,0.000317246,0.00059960864,0.00066744874,0.00006549451,0.0018562556,0.000014031844,0.000034203757,0.025470309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98420376,0.0007125139,0.0132808825,0.00038283024,0.00014516414,0.00021791333,0.000019742098,0.000039473896,0.0009977231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631375,0.00070739194,0.00029681437,0.00047595185,0.0016523818,0.00055371114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988614,0.0002269525,0.0000924158,0.0003984796,0.00017519934,0.0002455845],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005769087,0.00014915197,0.00023422328,0.000106560095,0.00026790245,0.000032430005,0.00042400186,0.00007474444,0.0029438338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006899769,0.00013365917,0.00008608761,0.00040518216,0.0001288991,0.0002388336,0.00042734446,0.00021115343,0.00014222797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010807558,0.0004601552,0.5485344,0.0002394439,0.00009914788,0.000006872443,0.007101283,0.00015916147,0.0052601392,0.0005404819,0.05609363,0.3804245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042379745,0.0024483074,0.88365525,0.00030821213,0.00020651493,0.000023938845,0.0017525568,0.04737282,0.003686791,0.006191653,0.049426533,0.00068942877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035372093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032780794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37973508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035138967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097365206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144489492","doi":"10.1071/wr09014","title":"Does habitat structure influence capture probabilities? A study of reptiles in a eucalypt forest","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Murdoch University","keywords":"Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Relative species abundance; Biodiversity; Biology; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02066719884520625,"score_gpt":0.30438623115543034,"score_spread":0.2837190323102241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144489492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995553,0.000012840531,0.0000017998902,0.0026480223,0.000036217254,0.0009806867,0.0000058935725,0.000021325666,0.00074017566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886405,0.0000055825667,0.00015619834,0.0004544392,0.00002698632,0.000057187084,0.0000036095068,0.0000076073106,0.0004243214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752325,0.00043210306,0.0003695044,0.0004644095,0.0007298256,0.00048088195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901026,0.00027880733,0.000074734024,0.00048268176,0.000060136448,0.000093381364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010584074,0.00013682384,0.00022297082,0.00014765328,0.00015563986,0.00002690071,0.000448769,0.00015510841,0.00029486787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007450622,0.0000900888,0.0000315999,0.0008443983,0.00042873918,0.0003347393,0.00018022509,0.00055749615,0.000029646922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009266811,0.0004595937,0.990463,0.000012148217,0.000005371234,0.000017585904,0.004016344,0.002504868,0.0002727755,0.00015430646,0.0014636617,0.00053763745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048751562,0.00055351027,0.9851455,0.00003007151,0.0000031952225,0.000002594232,0.0028477332,0.00022683809,0.00001522657,0.01029176,0.00028700978,0.00010904069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018433034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026151659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024308356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002044824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063795305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149345448","doi":"10.1071/wr10239","title":"Effects of harvest and climate on population dynamics of northern bobwhites in south Florida","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ASTER","funders":"Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission","keywords":"Colinus; Population growth; Vital rates; Population; Population model; Population decline; Wildlife; Ecology; Leslie matrix; Biology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.031564128964204616,"score_gpt":0.28998558404624747,"score_spread":0.25842145508204284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149345448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990812,0.000008464088,0.0000027277079,0.000027542861,0.000022042212,0.0002008844,0.000006869289,0.0000042761167,0.000646024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977887,0.000012582834,0.00009970388,0.000010876958,0.0000055358782,0.000011107864,0.0000049460655,0.0000065891277,0.000069761976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991355,0.0001244891,0.0001424765,0.00015538312,0.00022148243,0.00022065132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966866,0.00011180661,0.000043755284,0.000120777586,0.000009086194,0.000045940167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004986486,0.000054307005,0.00011092022,0.000083380146,0.000047633945,0.0000027875312,0.000107653046,0.00007006387,0.00009658066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090718335,0.0000474462,0.00001585061,0.00018745754,0.00026764974,0.00007635033,0.0001242406,0.00015618496,0.00005295071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006398909,0.00011598983,0.9969474,0.000037113077,0.0000016129741,0.000006158937,0.0007795544,0.000010945206,0.00023202147,0.00006863427,0.0000057376838,0.0017308212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022034737,0.00022216578,0.9986132,0.000030184681,0.000003183048,4.971684e-7,0.0001110072,0.00012419467,0.00048630446,0.00014452252,0.0000022253591,0.000042214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005883396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004999287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044109477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006645945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000566991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27897194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152242940","doi":"10.1071/wr13106","title":"Do measures of plant intake and digestibility from captive feeding trials align with foraging patterns of free-ranging snowshoe hares?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Pinus contorta; Herbivore; Foraging; Snowshoe hare; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Animal science; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.10927244422318813,"score_gpt":0.31397418184838594,"score_spread":0.2047017376251978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152242940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971094,0.00008751095,0.000436471,0.001091734,0.00003458421,0.00069190515,0.00013544095,0.0000148336985,0.00039813423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991232,0.000048606045,0.000561844,0.00008339041,0.000045240056,0.00007211366,0.000017950593,0.000012601206,0.000035028013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733174,0.00066585414,0.000461101,0.00040553138,0.00075399387,0.00038178076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747026,0.0017308879,0.00020250838,0.00037992626,0.00009239784,0.00012400348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004106759,0.00013579769,0.00040733838,0.00011609597,0.00018364679,0.000043849814,0.0003281911,0.00010627464,0.0006352615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014717487,0.00010377645,0.000044680794,0.0002288698,0.00046666348,0.0003725178,0.0003320972,0.00027643266,0.000018804134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014414686,0.000055254688,0.99001276,0.000026269088,0.000053324882,0.000003423985,0.0014425475,0.00007612216,0.0050746473,0.00013788234,0.0010695881,0.0019040158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071953464,0.00016298375,0.99204403,0.00018486007,0.000019549561,0.000002705583,0.0018306744,0.00049765885,0.0022234998,0.0021082633,0.00008847393,0.00011773826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018399836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010309283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017368907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009591363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046244677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160274947","doi":"10.1071/wr07017","title":"Nicarbazin bait reduces reproduction by pigeons (Columba livia)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Bird parasitology and diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Biology; Reproduction; Wildlife; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.09201050414584183,"score_gpt":0.36129298662460074,"score_spread":0.2692824824787589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160274947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97485197,0.0129044615,0.000008378474,0.0035035906,0.00061192835,0.0003309671,0.00004417834,0.00017727773,0.0075672446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96747,0.0014874932,0.00002580425,0.00025398686,0.00017337232,0.00010075956,0.00012932224,0.00002306689,0.030336179],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971376,0.0008873706,0.00028455324,0.0007355789,0.00014518035,0.00080971594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985504,0.00038548256,0.000059030066,0.00069321523,0.00022079235,0.000091043396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009566188,0.00016111032,0.00027155256,0.00020204602,0.0011390417,0.000017453829,0.00041575875,0.0004246168,0.0010447353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009309103,0.0001592205,0.00010218803,0.00046691086,0.0016576586,0.00015050791,0.0001620151,0.0008996893,0.004823915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023278571,0.00041094664,0.0693258,0.000010475644,0.00011388348,0.000027918217,0.0002059335,0.0000011650338,0.10606332,0.00020057222,0.82133406,0.0020731443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015451043,0.0007612238,0.13860302,0.00004998711,0.000041936968,0.000706249,0.0005020264,0.000002226591,0.07512451,0.00062807614,0.78153443,0.0005012346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044187784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026455216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06927721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053416148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002838082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163156469","doi":"10.1071/wr05039","title":"The propensity of spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus) to encounter and consume non-toxic meat baits in a simulated canid-control program","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Biology; Canis; Ecology; Zoology; Toxicology","score_opus":0.019818789121596878,"score_gpt":0.29705612055500036,"score_spread":0.27723733143340346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163156469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938397,0.00004633292,0.000009931756,0.0026405382,0.000040880117,0.0020644695,0.000008062114,0.000025731333,0.0013243742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983695,0.000016313325,0.000094278796,0.00046032702,0.00003081271,0.00011928682,0.0000043675773,0.0000149805655,0.00089010794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974394,0.00044309784,0.000386435,0.0004269293,0.0006283427,0.00067579927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885136,0.00051170995,0.00007057821,0.00034665575,0.0000850487,0.00013467055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001664499,0.00015536575,0.00026077745,0.000121562545,0.00033030452,0.00006727384,0.00033258263,0.00015390737,0.00012509411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031983893,0.000113306916,0.000038898193,0.0008351855,0.000636607,0.00015787272,0.00024896115,0.0003850974,0.00019550072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003033733,0.00017485999,0.99221444,0.000010819022,0.000015438989,0.000024341549,0.00012896668,0.0010968159,0.0009309814,0.000040328858,0.0031768205,0.0018828359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010876724,0.00018736857,0.98750246,0.000033228225,0.000007616244,0.0000054952907,0.00004971092,0.007859588,0.00004409034,0.00019619185,0.0028995266,0.0001270487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006044283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016448457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010404173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017519381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008904295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9178625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163652456","doi":"10.1071/wr07166","title":"Registration of wildlife contraceptives in the United States of America, with OvoControl and GonaCon immunocontraceptive vaccines as examples","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Population; Environmental protection; Environmental health; Environmental planning; Business; Medicine; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.03590617864328853,"score_gpt":0.29816452782731306,"score_spread":0.2622583491840245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163652456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923522,0.00014033252,0.00009313442,0.005132617,0.000008052278,0.000772939,0.000011114508,0.000009827931,0.0014798043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977614,0.00066839525,0.000244238,0.0007991378,0.000020729003,0.00011343111,0.000031026233,0.000010605678,0.00035103044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975407,0.00082478294,0.00040466423,0.00029559902,0.00058944017,0.0003448076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977549,0.0015647054,0.00022080113,0.00029263808,0.00011115099,0.000055835084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014015735,0.00014303769,0.00028427917,0.00017523955,0.00022870598,0.000014260921,0.0002919043,0.00008999724,0.00030705944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043677416,0.00009788972,0.000031130505,0.0008776285,0.0018253982,0.00028450857,0.0000695779,0.00032753602,0.000028138205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008311699,0.0002685261,0.98490185,0.000018012237,0.00004334919,0.000018041703,0.0063219345,0.00075106864,0.0010063661,0.00044226242,0.0037975502,0.0015999015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013394222,0.0008551833,0.9828572,0.000041596544,0.000010585169,0.00003108685,0.007020642,0.0010400515,0.00008727964,0.0005009121,0.00610041,0.00011561306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01185627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077413284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011082137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051263112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007946928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99472386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166764309","doi":"10.1071/wr06127","title":"Microhabitat use by the brush-tailed bettong (Bettongia penicillata) and burrowing bettong (B. lesueur) in semiarid New South Wales: implications for reintroduction programs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Endangered species; Vegetation (pathology); Geography","score_opus":0.07113928115424996,"score_gpt":0.3319595755010773,"score_spread":0.26082029434682735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166764309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707054,0.00021082131,0.0011150802,0.025954613,0.00009605892,0.0016751945,0.000015928888,0.000054233264,0.00017270085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461836,0.00006255198,0.0016394707,0.0007934856,0.00027953283,0.00019563494,0.00011151034,0.000039842624,0.0022596284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711937,0.0002578543,0.00047133112,0.0007443138,0.00042610988,0.0009810046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980091,0.0010273522,0.00010854105,0.00056327664,0.00006588472,0.00022588084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040179254,0.00020621097,0.00021616074,0.0001525999,0.00086502585,0.0001875957,0.00043537308,0.00022849748,0.00004835756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078271906,0.00017589387,0.00007191992,0.00092024036,0.00067095057,0.00059734285,0.0002909105,0.0006566494,0.00006742904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009239002,0.00006233453,0.94462717,0.000011827136,0.000016596945,0.0000014764809,0.00082794507,0.000048373025,0.0028424407,0.00022701742,0.03486385,0.016378608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074382685,0.00012574568,0.9612747,0.000031403684,0.000017651902,0.000018153049,0.0007508979,0.00030224308,0.00021778155,0.0008434564,0.035446867,0.00022731944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015396769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025394314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025161128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037648648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009191995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7172744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168981465","doi":"10.1071/wr06161","title":"Predicting the occurrence of the quokka, Setonix brachyurus (Macropodidae : Marsupialia), in Western Australia’s northern jarrah forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Swamp; Biology; Ecology; Akaike information criterion; Geography; Forestry; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06254575811532997,"score_gpt":0.3469319008012395,"score_spread":0.2843861426859095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168981465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934726,0.000021006337,0.000025986796,0.004324134,0.00022319464,0.0005670811,0.000018796962,0.000015872352,0.0013313297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775827,0.000011753307,0.000026484686,0.00042319164,0.00008249174,0.00003084774,0.0000051547386,0.000010511932,0.0016512846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969411,0.0005065626,0.0004543883,0.00036727486,0.0009655597,0.0007651323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983834,0.00072206993,0.00014008132,0.0006070397,0.000049539525,0.00009785256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042991624,0.0001445231,0.00015951769,0.00007943253,0.0004457007,0.000037022903,0.0010907926,0.00015836456,0.00029253197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005552843,0.00009374859,0.00007304517,0.0010167285,0.0011885747,0.00021393683,0.00060444593,0.00088239403,0.00032684224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005677722,0.00008582384,0.9938682,0.00001179432,0.0000075932426,0.00000817302,0.0010547619,0.0005645791,0.00009027195,0.00004699666,0.0027209937,0.0014840608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002655642,0.000060674945,0.9941015,0.0000411534,0.000004957294,0.000009599874,0.0005167708,0.00026967714,0.000056458874,0.00028583378,0.0042906124,0.00009719305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00935251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1362618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1269093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023875371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094400166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171132825","doi":"10.1071/wr11152","title":"Effect of paved road density on abundance of white-tailed deer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Wildlife; Predation; Relative species abundance; Odocoileus; Context (archaeology); Population density; Biology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.03285229719229934,"score_gpt":0.3504429063610417,"score_spread":0.3175906091687424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171132825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888087,0.000025458039,0.000043845044,0.00034762293,0.00010996245,0.00030780362,0.0000043960367,0.00001379747,0.010338425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980923,0.000016999125,0.00012269962,0.00011194432,0.000068832196,0.00003226263,0.0000046483915,0.000013005336,0.001537313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976628,0.00055495236,0.00026466913,0.00021373575,0.00087805063,0.0004258333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988308,0.0004354301,0.00009937579,0.0004379681,0.00005869784,0.00013770633],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002457588,0.00011251239,0.00021073662,0.00010396264,0.00019338695,0.000010643976,0.00024821536,0.000080517406,0.0013266258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004904543,0.00009084887,0.00008193609,0.00050275,0.0002944091,0.00028391674,0.00022742133,0.00028877627,0.0005843068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002280621,0.00018124386,0.9750093,0.000030606974,0.000013544183,7.506743e-7,0.00027909872,0.00006914944,0.010436405,0.00008645787,0.0059552337,0.007710104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039996754,0.0006333548,0.967012,0.00007028194,0.000009175239,0.0000033043991,0.000051067193,0.00053121167,0.023125412,0.00002478978,0.008031413,0.00010803672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059949857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005003173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126890065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015649603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018507091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171633698","doi":"10.1071/wr12039","title":"Revealing a cryptic life-history stage: differences in habitat selection and survivorship between hatchlings of two turtle species at risk (Glyptemys insculpta and Emydoidea blandingii)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Hatchling; Ecology; Biology; Overwintering; Habitat; Survivorship curve; Painted turtle; Turtle (robot); Predation; Population; Context (archaeology); Demography","score_opus":0.1138460940594011,"score_gpt":0.31024992180302097,"score_spread":0.19640382774361986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171633698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979922,0.00083106774,0.000030664633,0.00026231218,0.00006319914,0.00019989618,0.000008572758,0.00001500493,0.0005970821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977569,0.0003232166,0.00019901231,0.000038705264,0.0001007555,0.000016332478,0.0000061943574,0.000009629491,0.0015492409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802554,0.0006326934,0.00026038045,0.00028668367,0.00036288676,0.00043180387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988597,0.0007176022,0.00010568813,0.00012874158,0.000021674368,0.00016657739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027709757,0.00011856331,0.00022025687,0.00014586138,0.00021953677,0.000017248554,0.00012637336,0.00012375905,0.00022357081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058152096,0.00010315865,0.00002346081,0.0002838256,0.00054618105,0.00026702127,0.00024855701,0.00036870307,0.000032074866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004944482,0.000027245384,0.9953925,0.000034441688,0.000011829544,4.8404394e-7,0.0015765425,0.000004896746,0.0020417932,0.00015856785,0.0003593184,0.0003429116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031853467,0.00007997425,0.99670947,0.000033152002,0.000009600398,0.0000013060676,0.00026110557,0.00021030511,0.0001994868,0.00027430517,0.0017898805,0.00011288811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057290983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041349106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021894546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031679147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029083212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8660721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256035393","doi":"10.1071/wr15029","title":"Precision, accuracy and bias of walked line-transect distance sampling to estimate eastern grey kangaroo population size","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Victoria","keywords":"Transect; Distance sampling; Sampling (signal processing); Abundance (ecology); Population; Aerial survey; Ecology; Geography; Abundance estimation; Statistics; Physical geography; Biology; Cartography; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.1466763176429301,"score_gpt":0.4026041708538008,"score_spread":0.2559278532108707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256035393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99407166,0.000051375995,0.0023091713,0.0024985077,0.00008379104,0.00047464203,0.0000079788315,0.000028591921,0.00047430774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956429,0.000016383372,0.003364669,0.00025035875,0.00005285497,0.000034677345,0.000011444443,0.000015445987,0.00061128644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785113,0.00031349948,0.00034784415,0.00038896734,0.00071807945,0.00038045927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998083,0.0011459335,0.000082607105,0.00031652616,0.00009918123,0.000272748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024272543,0.000121387035,0.0001895392,0.00007919677,0.00018474604,0.00005019203,0.0002670532,0.00010409689,0.00011193136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004374316,0.00010993547,0.000029152416,0.000545361,0.00017834871,0.00035054414,0.00022970408,0.00023005354,0.00019598776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002144005,0.00005183771,0.9860392,0.000017047547,0.0000060646794,0.0000026860105,0.0006856024,0.002037598,0.00034723777,0.000089031855,0.001309114,0.009200167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041317943,0.00020193699,0.9890977,0.000064728716,0.0000056237845,0.0000042100596,0.00009832474,0.004030967,0.000085532,0.0031353359,0.0027361568,0.00012627633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012124233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010076698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009073891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042860967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5236781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2367479234","doi":"10.1071/wr15040","title":"Assessment of non-target risks from sodium fluoroacetate (1080), para-aminopropiophenone (PAPP) and sodium cyanide (NaCN) for fox-incursion response in Tasmania","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Richmond Hospital","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Vulpes; Biology; Context (archaeology); Introduced species; Zoology; Canis; Rodenticide; Wildlife; Sodium cyanide; Ecology; Invasive species; Toxicology; Predation; Chemistry; Cyanide","score_opus":0.08919697995665447,"score_gpt":0.3993512601862775,"score_spread":0.310154280229623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2367479234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952229,0.00013418835,0.000804352,0.0022622014,0.00007701545,0.0008812293,0.00011273531,0.000017926468,0.0004874332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340737,0.00020412383,0.005117395,0.00006858027,0.00003674386,0.00022491014,0.000008166154,0.00002506561,0.0009076761],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700856,0.000516249,0.00041828188,0.000670095,0.0006331807,0.0007536497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998109,0.0012181227,0.000114321585,0.00036006226,0.00005614734,0.00014234957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030802202,0.00021050086,0.00040821978,0.00013985671,0.00034169533,0.000020602347,0.0003632933,0.0001833728,0.00044525263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027243188,0.00015109745,0.00006410685,0.00025770825,0.0010146074,0.00021543805,0.0006879158,0.0003196473,0.00013438221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020498692,0.0003365327,0.7362251,0.000021883274,0.000025408637,0.000026527046,0.00033604164,0.000005304086,0.25520882,0.000049097922,0.0017029062,0.004012503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018495552,0.0012393817,0.9871314,0.0000659973,0.000017531422,0.0000017550005,0.00032450454,0.00041847624,0.0053512477,0.0009160304,0.002484255,0.00019986674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012916886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049660465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2509063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033923544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000924027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6161576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464710418","doi":"10.1071/wr16045","title":"Dietary overlap and co-existence of sympatric wild yak, Tibetan wild ass and Tibetan antelope in Arjin Shan National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang Province, China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Biology; Forb; Sympatric speciation; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Forage; Transect; Geography; Ecology; Grassland; Habitat","score_opus":0.03206548564909218,"score_gpt":0.3234142999092241,"score_spread":0.2913488142601319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464710418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98363596,0.0005403928,0.00000445158,0.0070171044,0.000048888574,0.00051273714,0.000048974234,0.000021761396,0.008169707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965498,0.0007290287,0.00027618778,0.0004150857,0.000071701266,0.0000262809,0.0000119192555,0.000020695412,0.0018993062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966896,0.00047891797,0.00040942788,0.00067027245,0.0011429946,0.0006087659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986504,0.0006370208,0.00012470972,0.00032167727,0.00006943571,0.0001968112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027476354,0.00020300582,0.0002912406,0.00032389315,0.00024234569,0.000042269457,0.0004316817,0.0003388972,0.00019452759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008009935,0.00015712448,0.000040705858,0.0008499892,0.0010735068,0.0007337594,0.00046030467,0.00072970975,0.000079851954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014708654,0.00011544924,0.988424,0.00005595279,0.000015599791,0.000023135772,0.00011704739,0.000004591273,0.0016648665,0.0006197205,0.005806635,0.0030059223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007153524,0.00021638052,0.9931005,0.00017260348,0.000004934162,0.000015988018,0.000071163166,0.00029517175,0.0001298221,0.0018307166,0.0032501384,0.00019717861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005427274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001118537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012913811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027924846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020071251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64073503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524143546","doi":"10.1071/wr16047","title":"Nesting ecology of hawksbill turtles at a rookery of international significance in Australia’s Northern Territory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Rookery; Carpentaria; Geography; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Critically endangered; Nesting season; Population; Seasonality; Habitat; Fishery; Sea turtle; Turtle (robot); Endangered species; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07058751550257218,"score_gpt":0.3384312605166885,"score_spread":0.2678437450141163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524143546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99674946,0.000012859754,0.000011608994,0.0016590037,0.00007615962,0.0001130395,0.000010268635,0.0000050752656,0.001362517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643946,0.00001892193,0.00009670096,0.000035634253,0.000037754748,0.000020281554,0.0000027777494,0.0000043598693,0.0033441316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888813,0.0001975695,0.00022821173,0.00019959356,0.00027171124,0.00021476315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932075,0.00038728604,0.00007599314,0.00014873831,0.00003126365,0.000035997487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007549919,0.00005461775,0.000103509075,0.00007706544,0.000032558684,0.0000020118994,0.00027867,0.00009051436,0.0008237535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027601275,0.0000394357,0.00002595832,0.00012065076,0.000615483,0.0000910101,0.00020680547,0.00010381043,0.00014130746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006970692,0.000046809557,0.9198234,0.000005619706,0.0000047988506,0.0000040808814,0.00011374504,0.00004676825,0.07661461,0.000049332,0.00085278775,0.0023683503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024003751,0.00006358605,0.991558,0.000036771853,7.328606e-7,0.0000024280446,0.0000441821,0.00004271139,0.0038562005,0.00052144827,0.0035861577,0.000047714377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00211451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068217465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072758414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024346712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003531129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90195227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594832554","doi":"10.1071/wr14239","title":"Middle of the road: enhanced habitat for salamanders on unused logging roads","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Salamander; Ecology; Logging; Context (archaeology); Snag; Coarse woody debris; Habitat fragmentation; Population; Fragmentation (computing); Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.11910882867045597,"score_gpt":0.3684508742250608,"score_spread":0.24934204555460482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594832554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96991014,0.000008086162,0.00026434046,0.008306262,0.00023459365,0.00055942696,0.0000066102584,0.000014447225,0.020696115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948746,0.000012264392,0.00019109627,0.00053158804,0.0000777365,0.000104017345,0.0000025692195,0.000016294227,0.0041898615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835706,0.00012688962,0.00020635997,0.00029829924,0.00063719414,0.0003742281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859047,0.00024767357,0.0001407077,0.0008992403,0.00005126607,0.00007062077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097396347,0.0001000068,0.00012617063,0.000059465576,0.001141031,0.000111790425,0.0007870997,0.00006678494,0.00023595378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007607415,0.000072226154,0.00010808453,0.00013202394,0.00051914295,0.0002810807,0.00028579342,0.0002510725,0.00016071067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092326145,0.00071081345,0.62599874,0.00011892262,0.00010847368,0.0000027818062,0.0018533057,0.0022691316,0.07733235,0.001938207,0.20510583,0.083638184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009065047,0.00026474133,0.9471323,0.00019377458,0.000008914063,0.0000013065928,0.00047101948,0.0039160377,0.0145790065,0.0014712773,0.03087858,0.00017653719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011657214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060456205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32113355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016801323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004296383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8776003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596638026","doi":"10.1071/wr16130","title":"Mitigation reduces road mortality of a threatened rattlesnake","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Queen's University; Laurentian University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Fencing; Threatened species; Context (archaeology); Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Habitat; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.13073311559582315,"score_gpt":0.4193402297351664,"score_spread":0.28860711413934326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596638026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577552,0.000014316988,0.000024998399,0.0034886368,0.000110326495,0.00022596976,0.000008803575,0.000017053457,0.038354672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971081,0.000052216586,0.0002321603,0.000090497975,0.00008252669,0.000046189325,0.000010185475,0.000010386976,0.0023677575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820334,0.00016465272,0.00025751282,0.00030423762,0.0007733182,0.0002969156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878645,0.00006816642,0.00016175673,0.0007925397,0.000087394226,0.00010369137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012503971,0.000091142945,0.00014088998,0.00006336572,0.00073875935,0.00013981198,0.00053592765,0.00007226068,0.0012649518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050516566,0.000081016435,0.00006463546,0.00016306307,0.000727091,0.00064165954,0.0002841195,0.00021597974,0.0004291418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041813324,0.0001497065,0.93604916,0.0000122031615,0.000028449578,0.000004770149,0.00024027792,0.000052080777,0.021145716,0.00037579943,0.02022284,0.021677176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020341833,0.000065055196,0.9864393,0.00003933028,0.0000062607887,0.0000025440588,0.00013349894,0.0008611843,0.005532732,0.001120897,0.005504153,0.000091628244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005562619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005014337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05039013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109949644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004840326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596797771","doi":"10.1071/wr16178","title":"Falling apart? Insights and lessons from three recent studies documenting rapid and severe decline in terrestrial mammal assemblages of northern, south-eastern and south-western Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Deakin University","keywords":"Mammal; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Geography; Fauna; National park; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Wildlife; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.17535605316722128,"score_gpt":0.39238961050522714,"score_spread":0.21703355733800586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596797771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954252,0.00044902353,0.000008130097,0.0036212208,0.000090675305,0.00031179062,0.000007884937,0.000008986118,0.00007703845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881953,0.0006618182,0.0001382703,0.000076422344,0.00011990225,0.000022575376,0.0000052003793,0.00001190143,0.00014439289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810576,0.0002506326,0.00034556608,0.0004964747,0.00041515342,0.00038641374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989848,0.00035474848,0.00019404839,0.00032172745,0.000025615185,0.00011904342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011988351,0.00016344988,0.00030604546,0.00008198562,0.00054521393,0.00016403497,0.00027215728,0.0001414868,0.000030734012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046592928,0.00014408448,0.000020826079,0.00008433265,0.0008566895,0.0004180943,0.001070927,0.00034543767,0.000019213332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015455185,0.00003138742,0.9898202,0.000017158622,0.0000436322,0.000018660518,0.0032899838,0.000013080367,0.00022828447,0.0000069183275,0.000044586526,0.006331552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001281086,0.0000919702,0.9952195,0.00012083396,0.000016481885,0.0000028155243,0.0012713154,0.00033948006,0.000035574765,0.0011047979,0.00037111764,0.00014498284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022897488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04709906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04480931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047176112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024602732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2661800170","doi":"10.1071/wr16194","title":"Identifying peaks in bat activity: a new application of SaTScan’s space–time scan statistic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scan statistic; Foraging; Myotis lucifugus; Human echolocation; Biology; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12044538687423202,"score_gpt":0.3799283796281717,"score_spread":0.2594829927539397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2661800170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98612237,0.000116623574,0.000013923619,0.011424188,0.00004533384,0.0002586443,0.000018166686,0.000013566661,0.0019871597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793535,0.00013686936,0.00007402554,0.00003755677,0.00013591882,0.00003339978,0.000009916717,8.2795964e-7,0.001636105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987511,0.0001981824,0.00014224437,0.0002962535,0.0002101153,0.00040208505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906987,0.0005229719,0.00010063835,0.00014579165,0.00007682864,0.00008392521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011088656,0.0000838572,0.00021296555,0.00003654553,0.00064573064,0.000048799677,0.00044869696,0.0001303644,0.00015302628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055633765,0.000037763595,0.0000369943,0.00016681032,0.00043868533,0.00012782545,0.0003211173,0.0002789133,0.00014510963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013449365,0.00013000338,0.702037,0.000021429823,0.00003353324,0.000008050591,0.00022568958,0.0000010926248,0.10008803,0.0008186454,0.009389722,0.18711235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014956546,0.0001347609,0.9930857,0.00002227185,0.0000033452097,0.0000015546468,0.00015292679,0.00010573552,0.0004201657,0.0021893184,0.003658664,0.00007599304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007935815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021774197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29104874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004966196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003504882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766857865","doi":"10.1071/wr17063","title":"Temporal variation in the population characteristics of harvested wolverine (Gulo gulo) in northwestern Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Yukon Department of Environment; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Population; Biology; Demography; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.04051850472688492,"score_gpt":0.30542588255058317,"score_spread":0.2649073778236983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766857865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941943,0.0000021461553,0.000008517066,0.0049919453,0.000087789944,0.00029574728,0.000010204221,0.0000033648898,0.00040597894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993675,0.00000817817,0.00004086728,0.00023190303,0.000040850617,0.00003266457,0.000045942867,0.0000059751565,0.0002261666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983327,0.00032243875,0.00031135004,0.00020011236,0.0005604019,0.0002729978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991546,0.00016936129,0.00015813511,0.00045700654,0.000023694907,0.000037165857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018481604,0.000074505144,0.00013209741,0.00006826007,0.00025033214,0.00005064727,0.0004966889,0.00007685909,0.00012729946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038449472,0.00006270635,0.00001492356,0.00021221348,0.00014092497,0.00034559064,0.00015685761,0.00028667372,0.000018188412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034445773,0.000059303875,0.9978157,0.0000082080805,0.0000021161395,0.0000124122225,0.00030162837,0.00006466904,0.000033697852,0.00008960764,0.00042946456,0.0011487424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002789477,0.0000321631,0.99799824,0.000019731047,0.0000014308619,0.0000015152968,0.00007724379,0.0007236215,0.0000021399946,0.00022029736,0.0005832483,0.000061424034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8741151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09777529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002778709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012353812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25570905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788447539","doi":"10.1071/wr17065","title":"Green-tree retention and recovery of an old-forest specialist, the southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi), 20 years after harvest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Clearcutting; Basal area; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Species richness; Context (archaeology); Biodiversity; Old-growth forest; Snag; Species diversity; Habitat; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.03038950147195481,"score_gpt":0.29153517047051647,"score_spread":0.2611456689985617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788447539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931576,0.000054856,0.000013915341,0.0016639961,0.0000731381,0.0002178398,0.000025901933,0.000012873609,0.004779835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880762,0.00007224187,0.00023304317,0.00017805422,0.0001901925,0.000032659875,0.000010018324,0.000013982164,0.011193587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848986,0.00030457947,0.00019010178,0.00029977653,0.00040053405,0.0003151749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936485,0.00012872017,0.000057342208,0.00032027115,0.000052596253,0.00007624532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012995228,0.000090893926,0.00012235311,0.000060594077,0.0003397389,0.000041609732,0.0002456303,0.00008723501,0.00057720643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013260944,0.00006972304,0.000037901096,0.00024675354,0.0020678658,0.00022020555,0.00032322947,0.00020239565,0.00039808662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002502476,0.00009214987,0.98608696,0.000015688114,0.00003620179,0.000012906127,0.0026113624,0.00002357988,0.0010098584,0.00026947464,0.004989186,0.0046023834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021497507,0.00028863328,0.9899277,0.000016906557,0.000008023581,0.0000043085993,0.000744802,0.0009122239,0.000026372201,0.0033505983,0.004417038,0.000088414294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011466154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043879103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04273249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059097176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016663407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9735676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794559218","doi":"10.1071/wr16218","title":"Establishing baseline estimates of blue sheep (Pseudois nayaur) abundance and density to sustain populations of the vulnerable snow leopard (Panthera uncia) in Western Bhutan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"Royal Government of Bhutan; Royal Society; Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Snow leopard; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Threatened species; National park; Context (archaeology); Population; Transect; Population density; Predation; Ecology; Distance sampling; Mark and recapture; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.05351753503130784,"score_gpt":0.3375887755710125,"score_spread":0.2840712405397047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794559218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99298173,0.00002305848,0.00057923584,0.005676353,0.000066379434,0.00040117768,0.000010013365,0.000010876041,0.00025117912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975901,0.00001076857,0.0014538342,0.00046860654,0.000047960377,0.00002120408,0.000003355173,0.0000113523365,0.0003927788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772686,0.00067941175,0.00033768316,0.00032447567,0.0005247211,0.00040685124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840814,0.00088795857,0.00008990727,0.00039519995,0.000121863355,0.00009692505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041883537,0.00010690974,0.00020427947,0.00012129083,0.0004632589,0.00003641244,0.00038503887,0.00009684804,0.00016309571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00326349,0.00008924858,0.000028030294,0.0009784258,0.00074088346,0.00030338977,0.00045703826,0.00039382858,0.000028199696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006214347,0.00007857483,0.9920208,0.000017838718,0.0000049897035,0.000002076742,0.0016412976,0.0011421356,0.0014424886,0.00015517544,0.0019157858,0.001516682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022701695,0.000118693606,0.9886336,0.000089698115,0.0000053427034,0.0000039583715,0.00062265265,0.006859786,0.0017097843,0.0012089255,0.0004276925,0.00009288675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074376566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032335818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024898162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015683938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008374878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806569854","doi":"10.1071/wr17106","title":"Northward bound: the distribution of white-tailed deer in Ontario under a changing climate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Climate change; Geography; Occupancy; Snow; Context (archaeology); Physical geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Species distribution; Habitat; Biology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.07452820469779643,"score_gpt":0.3259663112367001,"score_spread":0.2514381065389037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806569854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98113996,0.00001483497,0.00006419254,0.0019048909,0.00008451069,0.0002835278,0.00005014762,0.000016988071,0.01644094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865645,0.00003392413,0.000008560738,0.00023010535,0.00004362598,0.000044126627,0.00010628396,0.000009582535,0.000867336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760383,0.00016958166,0.0002390022,0.00027845308,0.00082116434,0.0008879638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934524,0.00008429426,0.00005253787,0.00035748867,0.000063772015,0.00009667678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020677773,0.00010555969,0.00013674505,0.00007630194,0.0006464546,0.000050024468,0.00036169266,0.00007658606,0.026126716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008657569,0.00007802151,0.000055645978,0.0009862643,0.0008529603,0.00013643864,0.00079643045,0.0003432444,0.0012721594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006381361,0.00009965569,0.989444,0.0000068712284,0.000005629819,0.000003049032,0.0020170042,0.000017054806,0.00032433355,0.0019363393,0.0058669443,0.00021530253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032265641,0.000092059076,0.9476904,0.000022598426,0.000003198188,0.0000032859957,0.0032716575,0.00015454898,0.0001744577,0.00017991666,0.047986675,0.00009854382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015733315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37400353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35827023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017670373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057474394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809617688","doi":"10.1071/wr17056","title":"Understanding conflict and consensus regarding wood bison management in Alaska, USA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Alaska Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Geography; Context (archaeology); Wildlife management; Bison bison; Socioeconomics; Wildlife; Forest management; Ecology; Forestry; Archaeology; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.19475196436163275,"score_gpt":0.3576345916814197,"score_spread":0.16288262731978695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809617688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92171896,0.000028679511,0.00014983566,0.003946734,0.00008341116,0.00033844227,0.000001112557,0.000019669653,0.07371319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959645,0.0001226277,0.00045138615,0.0006867975,0.00005938515,0.00002341138,0.0000014971853,0.000011456362,0.002678901],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981213,0.000277984,0.00019750705,0.00041252543,0.00044419206,0.0005464784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993162,0.00028398735,0.000034885332,0.00023304463,0.0000157395,0.00011614939],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00199255,0.00010347256,0.00012636956,0.00020013239,0.00037446598,0.000054486994,0.00018176109,0.000104322564,0.0007307027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012409934,0.00010277993,0.000018320163,0.0006011109,0.0009801623,0.000120250115,0.00036877065,0.00028951405,0.000803936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006903461,0.000036599973,0.96112394,0.000010251063,0.000015600404,0.000041483945,0.00041446614,0.000014140519,0.000077811506,0.0030745526,0.03410145,0.0010206604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010495977,0.00019100215,0.9583908,0.000056939436,0.000006832328,0.0000180987,0.0017458077,0.0018153564,0.000045171073,0.0030213392,0.033467505,0.00019160668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028535855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011189901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07424561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004177699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018407041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884005247","doi":"10.1071/wr17155","title":"The use of point-of-view cameras (Kittycams) to quantify predation by colony cats (Felis catus) on wildlife","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals","keywords":"Predation; Wildlife; Felis catus; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Camera trap; Invertebrate; Apex predator; Fishery; Geography","score_opus":0.10882383412946302,"score_gpt":0.36042717971081983,"score_spread":0.25160334558135683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884005247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98013204,0.00005456751,0.00013593957,0.017152736,0.0002097385,0.00093289977,0.00004339034,0.000025300069,0.0013133809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918276,0.00028026645,0.00043736317,0.004372539,0.000117921896,0.00012755382,0.00003112146,0.000029412478,0.0027762416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964129,0.0007952238,0.00053478865,0.0004942392,0.0011267185,0.00063618436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970838,0.0014957627,0.00018740672,0.00080400705,0.00021639431,0.00021265459],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025599692,0.00017449693,0.00025621353,0.00012470012,0.0006351332,0.000058779115,0.00067660346,0.00018101612,0.0004620939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002084547,0.00013670021,0.00006860289,0.0010898502,0.0013623539,0.00034341819,0.0003709083,0.0003812173,0.0012789164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030646913,0.00019230263,0.37796384,0.000016172804,0.000027545882,0.0000013288695,0.00062585494,0.000095139054,0.0017813107,0.0005928816,0.611377,0.007020163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035803407,0.0013022982,0.48413384,0.0000961296,0.000013964861,0.0000029958262,0.00017189854,0.00075154734,0.001876258,0.00024363349,0.51084423,0.0002051826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036978065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015542496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021001334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012584544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888945442","doi":"10.1071/wr18006","title":"Evaluating wildlife management by using principles of applied ecology: case studies and implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Canberra","keywords":"Wildlife management; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biodiversity; Landscape ecology; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Geography; Environmental planning; Biology; Habitat; Environmental science","score_opus":0.20579479417875648,"score_gpt":0.44022775682864607,"score_spread":0.23443296264988958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888945442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99205387,0.00006772777,0.00007229595,0.0019435146,0.0000454611,0.0006145757,0.0000067655114,0.000023433344,0.0051723476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99206656,0.0001103789,0.0061685094,0.0010266196,0.000060393755,0.00013666245,0.000003987559,0.000014115933,0.00041276644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981954,0.00022683667,0.0003307473,0.00044732392,0.00037349775,0.00042621206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989347,0.00040532474,0.00011362144,0.0003569894,0.000089853136,0.00009949892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025989378,0.000120047436,0.00018922593,0.00010628203,0.0008417175,0.000019097539,0.00020817839,0.00009162012,0.0001583327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002204445,0.00011352793,0.000021777754,0.00049010525,0.001672909,0.00012651125,0.0007565062,0.0001800132,0.00009001612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010198302,0.00018573328,0.94401073,0.00011386664,0.00019175552,0.000038213246,0.0017213702,0.00031255936,0.0034204072,0.0047555477,0.029193755,0.015954047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022099682,0.0010696067,0.93700737,0.00011893321,0.0001893739,0.0004884215,0.008851543,0.01530141,0.00066106423,0.0108634345,0.022507263,0.0007315886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010474853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018154937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015222458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018928747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033735174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6473896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895666811","doi":"10.1071/wr17185","title":"First assessment of the potential introduction by hunters of eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) in Spain","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Wildlife management; European rabbit; Ecology; Introduced species; Biology; Population; Wildlife; Invasive species; Geography; Wildlife conservation; Zoology; Archaeology; Demography","score_opus":0.019211505070781138,"score_gpt":0.2966174799609183,"score_spread":0.2774059748901372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895666811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869749,0.000015337704,0.00024126173,0.010578418,0.00037581747,0.0003525832,0.0000066028347,0.000007051382,0.0014480425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984349,0.000019761086,0.00013342916,0.0001862711,0.0002125278,0.000027436668,0.000005476182,0.000009397669,0.000970784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977454,0.0004984506,0.00033895072,0.00031332308,0.0007536441,0.00035020904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992549,0.00011457211,0.00011538158,0.0003971521,0.00006322833,0.000054809076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002097255,0.000094820214,0.00015992047,0.000087379434,0.00018936938,0.000012552205,0.00045702612,0.000104771505,0.0008572242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019549507,0.000076942226,0.000049903254,0.0006452797,0.0010444914,0.00018297564,0.00035419888,0.000320546,0.0000861675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007587411,0.00016307943,0.96294415,0.00001587772,0.0000104849105,0.0000010440954,0.00023597822,0.0004050675,0.0038132994,0.00008961325,0.031366516,0.00087898795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047769677,0.0002412155,0.98382616,0.000031107058,0.000004926181,0.0000027694518,0.00032984355,0.006475747,0.0009102951,0.00013296801,0.0074890736,0.00007821008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014608725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001971058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02387744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023923269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006558582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9386004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901306901","doi":"10.1071/wr18008","title":"Degrees of population-level susceptibility of Australian terrestrial non-volant mammal species to predation by the introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cat (Felis catus)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Vulpes; Biology; Mammal; Threatened species; Predation; Predator; Ecology; Population; Fauna; Felis; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.07450685067210476,"score_gpt":0.33082071723849366,"score_spread":0.2563138665663889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901306901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99059135,0.0000043272985,0.000040026913,0.008181118,0.00014136222,0.00067773345,0.000060067014,0.000010581279,0.00029345677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974026,0.000009708473,0.0004949635,0.00008358604,0.00023306924,0.000032628912,0.000072624636,0.000009895494,0.0016609053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977008,0.00041088928,0.00042349024,0.0004221194,0.0006541402,0.0003885266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989356,0.00028953576,0.00012373415,0.00046105226,0.000088174136,0.0001019524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019350691,0.00013137812,0.00021411118,0.00009269522,0.00032585385,0.000036147747,0.00038523466,0.00013519089,0.00045505574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008744906,0.00010128852,0.000039446437,0.00046856675,0.0009274617,0.00024324018,0.00030107333,0.00019155435,0.000042424603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003712501,0.00008161804,0.93099266,0.000012693245,0.0000160269,3.9261835e-7,0.000923331,0.000057924368,0.019918019,0.000046807076,0.04586504,0.0017142522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039381138,0.00037598735,0.994143,0.000018492969,0.0000097001675,0.0000018562727,0.00026192146,0.00072052795,0.0022777917,0.00016762664,0.0015298732,0.00009938146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011789455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103161335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06315038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015520258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005379546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99479115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902467597","doi":"10.1071/wr18091","title":"Forecasting the spatiotemporal pattern of the cane toad invasion into north-western Australia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hatch (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Colonisation; Geography; Habitat; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.14131063510816222,"score_gpt":0.35160683444100743,"score_spread":0.2102961993328452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902467597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99608636,0.0000073538363,0.000028138993,0.0024941096,0.00016098311,0.00027248022,0.0000040464643,0.0000067736396,0.00093972625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706054,0.0000059747804,0.000037210397,0.0002747101,0.00023063221,0.000009651918,0.000002894734,0.000008829117,0.0023695605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982796,0.00033926443,0.00020109418,0.00024334952,0.00056612334,0.0003705834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922097,0.00012916779,0.000075100244,0.00046079143,0.000036463254,0.00007753376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000907119,0.000085625456,0.00009837878,0.00002673368,0.00038105037,0.000020043171,0.0006530817,0.00007672354,0.00066891656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014085829,0.000042499545,0.00004891513,0.0003421778,0.001758098,0.000063188054,0.0007929344,0.00028658457,0.00042386074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011663443,0.00002036125,0.97732246,0.0000074364616,0.000004510576,0.0000019008639,0.0011364433,0.00000793737,0.0010404718,0.0000027806043,0.008492405,0.01195165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015180343,0.00022012574,0.9754702,0.00004243167,0.0000031390362,0.000011527032,0.00023784813,0.00049949967,0.0019077485,0.000079183745,0.021287637,0.00008889031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016438639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039546814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023108177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009969132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034055258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909592627","doi":"10.1071/wr18072","title":"The influence of food availability, quality and body size on patch selection of coexisting grazer ungulates in western Serengeti National Park","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute; Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildebeest; Biology; Ecology; Transect; Range (aeronautics); Niche; Context (archaeology); Biomass (ecology); Habitat; National park","score_opus":0.0543252004234107,"score_gpt":0.3523327623668232,"score_spread":0.2980075619434125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909592627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976286,0.000011644939,5.815293e-7,0.0012134991,0.000020060344,0.00032869313,0.0000052033497,0.0000064253363,0.00078526477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953175,0.000018857583,0.000030524432,0.00014898647,0.000010783086,0.00002254753,0.0000017177296,0.000005070123,0.00022977484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784476,0.00061526283,0.00035030697,0.00025727702,0.00069614284,0.0002362422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671566,0.002854131,0.000113807255,0.00016650073,0.00011194443,0.000037959566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00428707,0.00007317086,0.00013567002,0.000044478715,0.00014088971,0.000015000576,0.00018465423,0.00008917765,0.00009778252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017555075,0.00005820806,0.000020233414,0.00041642188,0.00044330978,0.00014515944,0.00016262934,0.00028562185,0.000046154437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105706524,0.00008409123,0.995836,0.000032218042,0.000008477315,1.07175914e-7,0.00019216005,0.0006983396,0.0021769311,0.00053828995,0.0001389959,0.00018864733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027004117,0.0002561209,0.99473464,0.00003232128,0.0000012657732,7.4132413e-7,0.000068474954,0.0004173087,0.00032843056,0.003687337,0.00014723095,0.00005610455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010130353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020710398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003149047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012058115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006371013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23736559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914058545","doi":"10.1071/wr18035","title":"Retaining change in attitudes and emotions toward coyotes using experiential education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Experiential learning; Context (archaeology); Perception; Psychology; Test (biology); Experiential education; Wildlife conservation; Applied psychology; Risk perception; Medical education; Social psychology; Ecology; Medicine; Geography; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.30049598923513654,"score_gpt":0.5025107018840484,"score_spread":0.2020147126489119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914058545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993308,0.00038322274,0.000014797145,0.0013439425,0.00054125587,0.00032534913,0.0000029255275,0.000012676305,0.0040678247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851847,0.00003474753,0.00020131117,0.00015175903,0.00034148907,0.00005568578,0.000011694756,0.000007002228,0.000677846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988031,0.00020968284,0.000120991186,0.00028835313,0.0002531349,0.00032473562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953,0.00013516826,0.000025973068,0.00014823288,0.000079290774,0.00008129921],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008980865,0.000060640905,0.00008748166,0.00030764105,0.0001274531,0.00006621051,0.00012009717,0.00007084465,0.00092425465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074708856,0.00005796574,0.000013987255,0.00043853698,0.00010875848,0.00025327306,0.00005634345,0.00022300579,0.00025672244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027618471,0.0001400626,0.9579679,0.000023060113,0.0000036450558,0.0000014084328,0.025275085,9.60149e-7,0.0008043545,0.005377506,0.00064407673,0.0097343195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013981252,0.000091177346,0.9827593,0.00009434094,0.0000013449263,0.000017862498,0.013401204,0.00035966025,0.000012287414,0.00017825329,0.002855814,0.000088924775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028383792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000644958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024791414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056529614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016191197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914884946","doi":"10.1071/wr17151","title":"Incorporating movement patterns to discern habitat selection: black bears as a case study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Florida","keywords":"Habitat; Selection (genetic algorithm); Movement (music); Ursus; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Geography; Land cover; Wetland; Wildlife; Biology; Land use; Population; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.03956813917136503,"score_gpt":0.3367622878287954,"score_spread":0.2971941486574304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914884946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918652,0.0000016314624,0.000056608154,0.0030218482,0.000104336075,0.0016155305,0.000003191952,0.000045175842,0.0032864457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99281746,0.0000010962441,0.00015071448,0.0022813333,0.00008811717,0.00016986209,0.000003755491,0.000022584818,0.0044650584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972343,0.00046787786,0.00028320332,0.0005880439,0.00088348077,0.00054313155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907297,0.00019938526,0.000057313497,0.00038354364,0.000050390372,0.0002364185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018807409,0.00014613951,0.00016039367,0.00012575898,0.0004232851,0.00008907521,0.00029390847,0.0000807547,0.00303508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014480969,0.00013918543,0.00003993584,0.00079457933,0.00012430281,0.00026771222,0.0006051526,0.00044338952,0.010482118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053712538,0.00033854737,0.98774475,0.000008595889,0.000020279273,0.0003412817,0.00167264,0.001028349,0.00015308693,0.000052241714,0.007565364,0.0010211397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058279635,0.0018327676,0.9825617,0.000019684921,0.000006823669,0.000100738886,0.011719954,0.001556766,0.000031089236,0.00039939236,0.0009709573,0.00021733959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00706385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014735224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010047314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039375428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006426395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942919807","doi":"10.1071/wr18025","title":"Modelling the rate of successful search of red foxes during population control","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Population; Statistics; Context (archaeology); Approximate Bayesian computation; Sampling (signal processing); Bayesian inference; Econometrics; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.03555976875652758,"score_gpt":0.29466753293272907,"score_spread":0.2591077641762015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942919807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958104,0.000020731439,0.00022303966,0.0020720204,0.000044204902,0.00049093424,0.0000038607373,0.000009540635,0.001325258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990847,0.000027746344,0.000070908405,0.00007031287,0.000027751465,0.000017813314,0.000004512523,0.000009809091,0.000686444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980251,0.00060612377,0.00028966524,0.00022555767,0.00053006253,0.00032348887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891835,0.00052924355,0.000086127984,0.00035509444,0.00006629427,0.000044905002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027099391,0.000072200826,0.00016416515,0.00008321508,0.0001863158,0.000012685824,0.00035479967,0.00008387553,0.000692311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104537845,0.00005458022,0.000049069167,0.00045405328,0.00026061092,0.00021470465,0.00015636013,0.0002829194,0.00014482356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014320429,0.00003101268,0.8223201,0.000028071508,0.000012023262,5.46139e-7,0.00015263024,0.17326982,0.0034999456,0.00029454424,0.00015641704,0.00009168561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005243634,0.00006655947,0.8613904,0.000025472751,0.0000044669546,9.656053e-7,0.00013519212,0.13635749,0.00055669685,0.0008036039,0.000078809266,0.00005599527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004886109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009307514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0390703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007240601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028238603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75803196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943603458","doi":"10.1071/wr18001","title":"Bird community responses to changes in vegetation caused by increasing large mammal populations in the Serengeti woodlands","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Woodland; Rarefaction (ecology); Biodiversity; Geography; National park; Context (archaeology); Biology; Vegetation (pathology); Snag; Wildebeest","score_opus":0.09696394212855972,"score_gpt":0.363594627874314,"score_spread":0.2666306857457543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943603458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98223066,0.00002016512,0.000006830614,0.016192676,0.00004762203,0.00061604753,0.0000061198316,0.000032562086,0.00084734056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971702,0.000010640679,0.00007640968,0.0022525964,0.000024701127,0.00011698544,0.000019750629,0.000017051689,0.00031164833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464613,0.003975373,0.00019659614,0.00021219996,0.00049620244,0.0004735208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982765,0.0012175785,0.000034977264,0.00038657486,0.000019940662,0.00006444745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008238783,0.00009396,0.00012158574,0.00023615797,0.00037017986,0.00004941181,0.00042012858,0.00011529286,0.00020199717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079928606,0.00007954513,0.000016545951,0.0009561274,0.00008934316,0.00020200569,0.000233703,0.00075609935,0.00082275737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012200419,0.00015481199,0.99165183,0.000008145525,0.0000018713329,0.000003365971,0.0036640596,0.00012382852,0.00063058274,0.00010865892,0.0032417334,0.00028907793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043780598,0.0001371081,0.9941345,0.00003322125,0.00000141259,0.0000020146547,0.0015922417,0.0005537633,0.0000111534155,0.00031512068,0.0026912645,0.00009041576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010590219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15796089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14737068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023261069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034711964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956170408","doi":"10.1071/wr18079","title":"The use of contraceptive techniques in managed wild African lion (Panthera leo) populations to mimic open system cub recruitment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cascades (Canada); University College of the North","funders":"","keywords":"Panthera; Population control; Population; Fecundity; Hysterectomy; Context (archaeology); Medicine; Litter; Wildlife; Demography; Biology; Surgery; Ecology; Environmental health; Family planning","score_opus":0.25823319794989463,"score_gpt":0.3924536346858932,"score_spread":0.1342204367359986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956170408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98211515,0.000014892013,0.00011193,0.008493687,0.00008005762,0.0045918324,0.000009629991,0.00003169012,0.0045511513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994599,0.00004217459,0.0015370238,0.00041475007,0.000018648376,0.0007725649,0.000006642207,0.000015285063,0.002593943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746317,0.00089334603,0.00035691555,0.00036076267,0.0004956064,0.00043021305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986473,0.0005881802,0.00009650275,0.00053190923,0.00004756616,0.000088539644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00262747,0.00010922124,0.00020125903,0.00015069875,0.00032557265,0.00010308846,0.0007148122,0.00010018428,0.00016926165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021545654,0.000084016276,0.000035401943,0.0008449825,0.00021036979,0.00039167915,0.00060848694,0.00031552042,0.00042303817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024988817,0.00011038122,0.9732582,0.000012066582,0.00001407487,0.0000041909693,0.00065753626,0.0004399844,0.000867734,0.0029708233,0.013853959,0.007561174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003140149,0.00028063054,0.94590825,0.0001416863,0.0000046495875,0.0000022473719,0.0014037399,0.0012379854,0.00020904288,0.0002735174,0.05009404,0.00013021516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006476977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052799797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03624008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005739052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046150675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981361409","doi":"10.1071/wr18122","title":"Estimating kangaroo density by aerial survey: a comparison of thermal cameras with human observers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lethbridge College","funders":"","keywords":"Aerial survey; Wildlife; Transect; Wildlife management; Geography; Population; Ecology; Distance sampling; Habitat; Animal ecology; Population density; Camera trap; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Survey methodology; Photogrammetry; Remote sensing; Biology; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06558777232214827,"score_gpt":0.3466673594029797,"score_spread":0.2810795870808315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981361409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976427,0.000008782692,0.000043375334,0.00030955646,0.00008051376,0.00036150875,0.000009721952,0.000021525566,0.001522344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985816,5.226828e-7,0.0005792592,0.00013581051,0.000036511887,0.000014582168,0.000047283127,0.000014805504,0.00058961986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757737,0.00068438036,0.00025031972,0.00033945797,0.00071523874,0.00043322207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989999,0.00039467748,0.0001133296,0.00033624237,0.00005614996,0.00009969042],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093626,0.000116190444,0.00024921278,0.00004245153,0.00029747258,0.000026623577,0.0003408391,0.000112442,0.0011170977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016491592,0.00010088032,0.000030411215,0.00038282498,0.00048761343,0.0001934282,0.00022276245,0.0003936241,0.00042591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014343041,0.00012970663,0.9756958,0.000012261553,0.000018323015,0.0000015799951,0.00030368523,0.0010005232,0.0073039746,0.000024644067,0.015035417,0.00033066346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000550068,0.00033913183,0.9945219,0.000019176396,0.0000046463338,0.0000011328434,0.00013068395,0.0034002292,0.00057061424,0.000025186695,0.00031870103,0.00011852747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008660092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030081263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018826112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012647988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056385023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022285466","doi":"10.1071/wr19105","title":"Wild-born versus captive-bred: a comparison of survival and refuge selection by translocated numbats (Myrmecobius fasciatus)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Captive breeding; Predation; Threatened species; Captivity; Population; Wildlife; Habitat; Zoology; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Wildlife conservation; Endangered species; Demography","score_opus":0.0826388349827848,"score_gpt":0.34859582161765257,"score_spread":0.2659569866348678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022285466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99164665,0.000103663966,0.00021847065,0.0059850304,0.00009837891,0.0003666464,0.000025755957,0.000052877276,0.0015025444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921376,0.00005016189,0.00016355475,0.00023826197,0.0000582688,0.00002969497,0.00003563945,0.00001892087,0.0001917575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744636,0.0005242522,0.00033234808,0.0004977951,0.0007022765,0.00049699424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991032,0.00034532836,0.00008792176,0.00015173678,0.00005895314,0.00025285524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086358545,0.00015341007,0.00029943133,0.00006100657,0.0003236724,0.000029477203,0.00026490458,0.00019988517,0.0005427541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028717634,0.00015889035,0.00004381039,0.0009584623,0.0005428173,0.00024414237,0.00013893188,0.0005560447,0.00019652395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001051759,0.00021105078,0.9452034,0.000031723546,0.00005525488,0.0000030299655,0.0011731286,0.00017108461,0.0074776406,0.00028680812,0.041447133,0.0028879715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048156884,0.0025817966,0.8819585,0.000040086186,0.00005779283,0.000004522058,0.0017071549,0.024679706,0.0037907301,0.00020846711,0.07957635,0.0005792404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008299302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006341346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06324495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013918903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006635589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64793605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025298991","doi":"10.1071/wr18200","title":"Please come again: attractive bait augments recapture rates of capture-naïve snowshoe hares","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; The Scarborough Hospital; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Population; Ecology; Toxicology; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.09085990576750817,"score_gpt":0.34486333218219156,"score_spread":0.2540034264146834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025298991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621107,0.00011734652,0.000068853835,0.026690254,0.00009585831,0.0005907735,0.000056641995,0.00004333714,0.010226259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309826,0.000053819193,0.00025570803,0.005041875,0.00011883141,0.000061638166,0.00004768661,0.000023210361,0.0012989711],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970543,0.00058123126,0.0003357582,0.0005392482,0.0009214778,0.0005679868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985628,0.0005550234,0.000120366705,0.00033189895,0.000086743996,0.00034317918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009643582,0.00018345087,0.00027756012,0.00007651459,0.00032957864,0.000036051308,0.0005613493,0.00021843977,0.0037730923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009853268,0.00016887226,0.00008455454,0.00076369895,0.00064180396,0.00037260828,0.0004176073,0.00075832277,0.0014610939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021392472,0.00015662651,0.8338308,0.000033582026,0.00004603605,0.000032970314,0.0016602903,0.00032536182,0.0016201991,0.00016102381,0.16113093,0.0007882825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081875396,0.00031354182,0.9622321,0.000041043633,0.000016057402,0.000004608155,0.001329122,0.0017463678,0.0009784697,0.00060927914,0.031647358,0.00026328195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007309424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001525237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12948357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016608654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009769533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025645786","doi":"10.1071/wr19100","title":"Sources and dynamics of international funding for waterfowl conservation in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Nature Conservancy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Waterfowl; Geography; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Wildlife management; Government (linguistics); Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.2698227841606925,"score_gpt":0.3074252366812406,"score_spread":0.03760245252054811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025645786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97686785,0.00009149183,0.0025362729,0.019662907,0.000022104448,0.00022229717,0.00006148572,0.0000019615877,0.00053360104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989703,0.00020016884,0.0003020965,0.00034124107,0.000032726806,0.000022462013,0.000071186594,0.0000057294014,0.00005404955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993853,0.000029297737,0.00029107503,0.00014277012,0.000048008365,0.00010356955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999583,0.0001600103,0.00014119282,0.000076888246,0.000017880715,0.000020992467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006607992,0.00003934573,0.00012243378,0.000101582744,0.00003949365,0.000016230466,0.00014360104,0.000024303836,0.000010067218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018310531,0.000037576632,0.000024675648,0.00011729866,0.00013480512,0.00011395805,0.000049937178,0.0000774878,0.000007498875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031859076,0.00002531087,0.98839414,0.00003762926,0.00001063751,2.0441838e-7,0.0013244285,0.00025658854,0.000006212921,0.00795221,0.00070491916,0.0012558455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039430332,0.0001418881,0.90951806,0.0000109684715,0.0000014977986,6.989755e-7,0.0011090529,0.07549891,0.00001154391,0.0026551282,0.010605241,0.000052676038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000217175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009038739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07887606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051919647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009056301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15323307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035365993","doi":"10.1071/wr19165","title":"Climatic correlates of migrant Natal long-fingered bat (Miniopterus natalensis) phenology in north-eastern South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Phenology; Geography; Ecology; Population; Cave; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.1047097711205216,"score_gpt":0.28619942742997945,"score_spread":0.18148965630945785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035365993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921875,0.0013558683,6.6711516e-7,0.005606294,0.00010023372,0.0002837734,0.000089297486,0.000033481334,0.00034290712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992593,0.00015610165,0.000021611491,0.00026808682,0.0001216965,0.000032684864,0.00005608103,0.0000017494684,0.00008266707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977211,0.0004074015,0.00041136902,0.00046556612,0.0002698222,0.0007247358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856657,0.0009829386,0.00009672444,0.00008621029,0.00013052938,0.00013701752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059581787,0.00016742514,0.00043696744,0.00005279435,0.00022540725,0.000014558986,0.00048009146,0.00024583685,0.00020838557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006570842,0.00007333576,0.00009369995,0.00079582917,0.0006874624,0.00007281329,0.0004607477,0.00059766934,0.00032699804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026204844,0.00010918109,0.99036646,0.000043688207,0.000050449282,0.00006288328,0.0040676706,0.000003538466,0.0006677302,0.000030099402,0.0006686428,0.003667581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000441178,0.0010259954,0.9919492,0.00003702949,0.000011019432,0.000009035695,0.0036179938,0.00035301424,0.00005560981,0.000082688035,0.0022273315,0.0001898758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012766046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034205972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070718434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022209648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020957641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42030072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084408974","doi":"10.1071/wr19232","title":"Determining marine mammal detection functions for a stationary land-based survey site","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada; Government of British Columbia; Vancouver Native Health Society","funders":"","keywords":"Porpoise; Posterior probability; Prior probability; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Range (aeronautics); Bayesian probability; Statistical power; Computer science; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Ecology; Mathematics; Geography; Biology; Engineering; Detector","score_opus":0.14372953481654538,"score_gpt":0.34932907717811723,"score_spread":0.20559954236157185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084408974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98763824,0.000016638847,0.005058976,0.0022707954,0.000053995576,0.0007375505,0.000102561346,0.00007680054,0.004044425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969504,0.000019557578,0.0010451627,0.0010524255,0.00012764396,0.0001860548,0.00009472646,0.00002307979,0.00050095824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981813,0.00025989502,0.00018761687,0.00038482106,0.000570423,0.00041596894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989035,0.00066162995,0.000038441274,0.00015229259,0.0000615744,0.00018256324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011798331,0.00010687633,0.00013656747,0.000044434037,0.00044603998,0.00004404125,0.00017486549,0.00004503941,0.0014120353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009086089,0.000102992926,0.000055608598,0.0006215331,0.00011973416,0.00012544625,0.000523348,0.0002222735,0.0008395622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002495929,0.000038247494,0.94377047,0.000040482588,0.000010867303,0.000004999976,0.000058759633,0.0005834869,0.0002500025,0.0000017842478,0.009884855,0.04510646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004799945,0.000460056,0.88411343,0.0000048372526,0.0000052496866,0.0000011439885,0.00002772532,0.031445406,0.000043966185,0.000021572803,0.08328275,0.000113860544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045380984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136975255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07339789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015362521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034376953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112467131","doi":"10.1071/wr20205","title":"Estimating habitat characteristics associated with the abundance of free-roaming domestic cats across the annual cycle","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Temperate climate; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.03442932939035959,"score_gpt":0.4038753923181765,"score_spread":0.3694460629278169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112467131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99670494,0.00025989575,0.0001267413,0.0019248523,0.000105859406,0.00024012686,0.00029299516,0.00001091482,0.0003336849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984358,0.0000107494125,0.000075379874,0.00022364312,0.00015514668,0.0001293283,0.00003958091,0.000025780702,0.00090459234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980267,0.00038759861,0.0002175991,0.00027075724,0.00066818047,0.00042913962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983091,0.00049689336,0.00015966411,0.00049339724,0.00049911154,0.00004184811],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001641998,0.00011607747,0.00015734279,0.000030979558,0.0014438842,0.00008129108,0.0006573882,0.00003827593,0.00001969752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021796217,0.00007309672,0.00005337079,0.00029798754,0.0004756402,0.0000089432,0.0011201014,0.0005460192,0.0000066484617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025796192,0.002057146,0.3721316,0.0003697915,0.0033980857,0.00025133474,0.061211467,0.011732837,0.25582042,0.0008159876,0.27208102,0.017550692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038995454,0.00583894,0.7267861,0.00035023855,0.0001304007,0.00028589956,0.09758179,0.010495507,0.0063251015,0.0004192809,0.1465158,0.0013714427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006666789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012750775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35465446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006888821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011476643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135501971","doi":"10.1071/wr20002","title":"Short-term responses of tree squirrels to different-sized forest patches on new clearcuts in a fragmented forest landscape","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Basal area; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Context (archaeology); Biology; Clearcutting; Geography; Forestry","score_opus":0.08430192038562143,"score_gpt":0.3664403910950842,"score_spread":0.28213847070946274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135501971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942622,0.00005888721,0.0000132851865,0.0026987123,0.000046827263,0.00038193425,0.000012445525,0.000019590963,0.00250611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964537,0.00011076032,0.00012377268,0.00017146718,0.000038092065,0.00006939081,0.000009872919,0.000019370507,0.003003589],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973899,0.0003920346,0.00031689173,0.00050697406,0.00073825184,0.0006559227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867606,0.00065977947,0.000030827734,0.00036725492,0.00003302404,0.000233061],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061173894,0.00017373903,0.0003488599,0.00017764932,0.0001744116,0.000026432515,0.00034535947,0.00013478106,0.0010811236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053737825,0.00014342536,0.000083871586,0.0006558701,0.00030442566,0.00008308544,0.0007318534,0.00041532208,0.00029924346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011235621,0.00048224386,0.9784396,0.00001223343,0.000016266444,0.00015320035,0.0006197447,0.000050910614,0.0053342963,0.000063119885,0.008551783,0.0051530297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006994609,0.00071312225,0.99592555,0.00008072572,0.000007851306,0.0000041161693,0.000632872,0.000054560336,0.0009687328,0.00017821319,0.0005953921,0.00013943571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034994134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022138001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02178806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015697855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007099727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154290918","doi":"10.1071/wr20090","title":"Developing a correction factor to apply to animal–vehicle collision data for improved road mitigation measures","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Mount Royal University","funders":"Calgary Foundation; Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Transport engineering; Survey data collection; Collision; Wildlife; Transect; Data collection; Geography; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Engineering; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.13520283629586838,"score_gpt":0.3956945200908828,"score_spread":0.2604916837950144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154290918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366954,0.000018962583,0.03762859,0.022959866,0.00044570197,0.0014341857,0.00012505439,0.00006578001,0.0006264402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725493,0.00003511335,0.019344892,0.003675595,0.00030082272,0.00050687493,0.00029967548,0.000044554756,0.0032431267],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758244,0.000195899,0.00030600815,0.0007548575,0.00067888416,0.0004819185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839467,0.00029495684,0.00004942791,0.00071495905,0.00030020784,0.00024576925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001087402,0.00013513799,0.00015335392,0.00013329925,0.0005748805,0.0002494582,0.0004752136,0.000088551744,0.00024229847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024313575,0.00013802186,0.000040730956,0.0012709418,0.00004634312,0.00061014626,0.0007036023,0.0002163203,0.0005164586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045470343,0.00018801192,0.018208317,0.000025566465,0.000034492594,0.000003902109,0.0006950008,0.00061004324,0.3764963,0.00011752323,0.29797986,0.3051863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050613814,0.00037686358,0.17576048,0.00013244493,0.000009483902,0.000011212073,0.0012673064,0.054720588,0.026303409,0.000139621,0.74039155,0.0003809287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017517076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025115802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44241166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006669134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022161864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66382027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155357019","doi":"10.1071/wr20071","title":"The demographics of knowledge, attitudes and emotions toward coyotes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Visitor pattern; Context (archaeology); Demographics; Psychology; Wildlife; National park; Social psychology; Demography; Geography; Ecology; Sociology","score_opus":0.17503965124488804,"score_gpt":0.4628966145055244,"score_spread":0.28785696326063637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155357019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.956433,0.0059462567,0.0000661979,0.009932813,0.00037464115,0.00011880443,0.000013531841,0.000013833363,0.027100928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942188,0.00107889,0.00009374678,0.000041722175,0.000117606665,0.000013157938,0.0000049806727,0.000003935908,0.004427104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885523,0.00034874806,0.00012025699,0.00018045722,0.00023892762,0.00025636674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805695,0.0013075615,0.00002158082,0.00019579145,0.0003387764,0.00007935092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013629493,0.000044263732,0.00007218277,0.00008434471,0.0004017663,0.000045527173,0.00017187299,0.000053729644,0.00018343229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041502336,0.000030472884,0.000027329956,0.00069632614,0.0005673517,0.000041594663,0.000081959115,0.00023171601,0.000094668576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002354742,0.00026647325,0.7824293,0.000040797393,0.00004027496,0.0000054739726,0.0037190744,3.4380744e-7,0.0005011195,0.14561094,0.052795887,0.014566772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007965635,0.00006951941,0.94228435,0.000027050577,0.0000034124337,0.00002322966,0.0035455406,0.000020171325,0.000038103197,0.0019202128,0.051943958,0.000044799417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008386245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018172912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15985504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007790731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017941251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3090102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159862550","doi":"10.1071/wr20107","title":"Animal welfare testing for shooting and darting free-ranging wildlife: a review and recommendations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Saskatchewan Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Ammunition; Wildlife; Animal welfare; Ballistics; Small arms; Harm; Risk analysis (engineering); Projectile; Aeronautics; Fishery; Engineering; Business; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Physics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14539290800943594,"score_gpt":0.4091778042582288,"score_spread":0.26378489624879287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159862550","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015629346,0.97548884,0.000031125415,0.021023685,0.000070372895,0.0020074332,0.00007238593,0.00006243254,0.0010874349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004118422,0.99070585,0.006214245,0.0015291022,0.00019569861,0.0007896247,0.0001612533,0.000074328644,0.0002887043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582,0.00095194473,0.00085988187,0.0010420667,0.00044260756,0.0008835357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958719,0.0028757711,0.00033440627,0.00055451685,0.00011385325,0.00024954558],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005255084,0.00039325666,0.0012590121,0.00018240882,0.001705318,0.0001783961,0.00046667198,0.00031898453,0.00035319524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008474188,0.00037595036,0.00016034172,0.0012769976,0.00035789996,0.00034396374,0.0014367484,0.0010535397,0.000035669284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030600113,0.000042867767,0.012546595,0.018449537,0.00008007026,0.000013772751,0.00006736522,5.625395e-7,5.9436604e-7,0.00047396237,0.05579639,0.91252524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018662676,0.000102593665,0.0008954263,0.021723747,0.00037975708,0.00011702084,0.00012346235,0.00014244324,4.0617135e-8,0.00006478112,0.9758907,0.00037343206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011191523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067769644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92009425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023652654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017924653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193946360","doi":"10.1071/wr20169","title":"A comparison of manual and automated detection of rusa deer (Rusa timorensis) from RPAS-derived thermal imagery","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Sampling (signal processing); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Computer vision","score_opus":0.048367549868040885,"score_gpt":0.3568360006198127,"score_spread":0.3084684507517718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193946360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980448,0.00013101244,0.000097942444,0.00061052147,0.00006065858,0.0001447017,0.000014612869,0.00004048703,0.0008552467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988795,0.00003326113,0.00076750293,0.00012668774,0.00003288433,0.000014942648,0.000023596562,0.000010478745,0.00011115447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981099,0.000482862,0.00032112416,0.0003075625,0.0005009125,0.00027763215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990539,0.00041936373,0.00010135435,0.0002609843,0.00008258205,0.000081798025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006560497,0.00009745177,0.00024758055,0.000071115624,0.00015476027,0.00001697387,0.00014127642,0.00014283719,0.00090519874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026427157,0.000096047705,0.00004250813,0.00039637077,0.0006054531,0.00016653993,0.0002868194,0.0002748509,0.000107467014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008258795,0.000120184646,0.7153042,0.000011704817,0.000027061158,0.0000086921045,0.0003886737,0.00011819406,0.2771996,0.0000068693876,0.0015155557,0.0052166814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032442168,0.00008655792,0.9088444,0.000020633175,0.0000129007085,0.0000031800957,0.00042579652,0.013062804,0.07674625,0.00010953214,0.0002823394,0.00008118042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091970264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041864117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20045334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056909288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005266022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99112916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205176644","doi":"10.1071/wr21072","title":"Estimating and validating koala Phascolarctos cinereus density estimates from acoustic arrays using spatial count modelling","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Precision Nanosystems (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Phascolarctos cinereus; Threatened species; Context (archaeology); Biology; Ecology; Animal ecology; Habitat; Statistics; Population; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.07953362133979813,"score_gpt":0.32969260242988335,"score_spread":0.2501589810900852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205176644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8143142,0.000050566523,0.18452272,0.000586838,0.000089843335,0.0001929341,0.0000070422357,0.000038016522,0.00019783074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8770355,0.000014735542,0.12233146,0.00034316213,0.00016125385,0.000013791482,0.0000340499,0.000022341497,0.000043704116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976085,0.00026500016,0.00030465075,0.0006111664,0.0006765993,0.0005341219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853736,0.0007659064,0.00008193493,0.00032520777,0.00010549734,0.00018410184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010716841,0.00017038453,0.00025308834,0.000058481455,0.0008877868,0.00016498112,0.00015481454,0.0001533148,0.00044344127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083378423,0.00018055041,0.000040540654,0.00035875128,0.00031582516,0.00032144334,0.00047638715,0.0005411576,0.00006235675],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028636938,0.00007184897,0.7821438,0.000024280953,0.00002400569,0.00008623364,0.00031922394,0.19878122,0.01719648,0.000010458505,0.00018968825,0.0011241287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035002083,0.00003460641,0.09410375,0.00009075912,0.000032810083,0.000042000556,0.00014970131,0.9023986,0.0011055788,0.0014907252,0.000035426026,0.00016605479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004460771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045515082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70361733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022934521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015237834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7362633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226048888","doi":"10.1071/wr21060","title":"Grizzly bear response to translocation into a novel environment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Saskatchewan; Golder Associates (Canada); Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"fRI Research; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Ursus; Habitat; Wildlife; National park; Grizzly Bears; Context (archaeology); Recreation; Wildlife management; Geography; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Biology; Population; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04259597857727101,"score_gpt":0.3073954399143602,"score_spread":0.2647994613370892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226048888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94988555,0.00002303302,0.001386582,0.04701131,0.000086020715,0.00063244934,0.000011120635,0.000037866896,0.00092604547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99010396,0.000012670675,0.0018491694,0.0037294237,0.000049210274,0.0007382669,0.00001589934,0.000022240602,0.0034791522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966865,0.000865186,0.00023504194,0.0005076421,0.0011988338,0.00050679286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989637,0.00033300387,0.000033067026,0.00044096546,0.000011709624,0.00021752776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048104012,0.0001124793,0.000115913565,0.0001766119,0.001179082,0.000027517597,0.00052752363,0.0000607964,0.0062146275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022572996,0.00012510276,0.00004489955,0.00077409536,0.00022881183,0.00015359349,0.0006381281,0.0005155078,0.0030274936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052283914,0.0017906255,0.59971434,0.000016945298,0.00005411286,0.0000626755,0.0149074225,0.039124932,0.13082902,0.0010372783,0.17280933,0.034424923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055375,0.0006169077,0.5245205,0.000004294168,0.0000035007172,0.000013214038,0.0008315735,0.00090710836,0.00015408537,0.00054196944,0.47166345,0.00018960574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005536258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085784806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2988541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009251983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008629887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312325762","doi":"10.1071/wr21159","title":"Snow track counts for density estimation of mammalian predators in the boreal forest","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia; University of Alberta; Yukon Agricultural Association; Okanagan University College; Ministry of Environment; Ministry of Forests; Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Snow; Transect; Physical geography; Boreal; Taiga; Ecology; Environmental science; Abundance (ecology); Population; Geography; Population density; Biology; Meteorology; Demography","score_opus":0.04582134292146169,"score_gpt":0.3232375918135217,"score_spread":0.27741624889206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312325762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932584,0.000004365551,0.00010701321,0.0022294924,0.000043757325,0.0004003818,0.000013413606,0.0000050222316,0.003938148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899656,0.0000022467632,0.00015570503,0.00031062274,0.00001664486,0.00009931056,0.000035093566,0.0000041044495,0.00037972594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989749,0.00023222959,0.000111065696,0.00012220828,0.00038747882,0.00017209692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951863,0.0002766704,0.000025189727,0.00014873694,0.000011201558,0.00001956688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001958553,0.000035490153,0.000053706175,0.000042267773,0.00021816227,0.000007844637,0.00023798885,0.000030418962,0.0003744645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020095473,0.000030035086,0.000020261088,0.0002892217,0.00013774795,0.000070178285,0.000092982795,0.00017718876,0.000056635494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048257196,0.000079755024,0.9285132,0.0000068591635,0.0000021157011,0.0000020247035,0.0003655154,0.0028965478,0.000004969141,0.0013502967,0.06338581,0.0033446387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016308132,0.00010002695,0.9746022,0.0000022703143,0.0000019969737,0.0000029433888,0.0002432472,0.013491138,0.000009317495,0.0026679577,0.008682426,0.000033396173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048386116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007397774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054703377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010437964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003692988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41001236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312727825","doi":"10.1071/wr22079","title":"Abundance, demography, and harvesting of water snakes from agricultural landscapes in West Java, Indonesia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Context (archaeology); Population; Fishery; Biology; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.021562082525784464,"score_gpt":0.2644334593295506,"score_spread":0.24287137680376614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312727825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966728,0.00016303774,0.0000010531611,0.0006908142,0.000036155627,0.00014637914,0.000015677644,0.000010200876,0.002263878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993217,0.000051186737,0.00010208391,0.00005666207,0.00003660266,0.000030060357,0.000025669931,0.000006242131,0.0003697671],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844354,0.00033097217,0.00017751119,0.00028892493,0.00038903707,0.00037002744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962103,0.00014169433,0.000026880649,0.0001260357,0.000008200972,0.000076128556],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006854984,0.00007844879,0.000143474,0.00009864708,0.00023376614,0.00001844145,0.00023296414,0.000046692607,0.0010443414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023058343,0.0000497339,0.000029370445,0.0003508909,0.0003587564,0.00008844755,0.0006281076,0.00031691388,0.00004281852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024748473,0.000052232794,0.9674931,0.000005138279,0.000005329622,0.000011108575,0.0007651918,0.000116737414,0.028704405,0.000018079661,0.0012020111,0.0016018705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002963998,0.000098974895,0.9902158,0.000009593349,0.0000014889333,0.000009692926,0.0011006728,0.000089337016,0.00052399863,0.000088616885,0.00748013,0.000085333064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028274562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010575382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028180407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048062062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008735646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312779280","doi":"10.1071/wr22040","title":"Nutritional stress and population density influence risk/reward decisions by elk","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Forage; Foraging; Neophobia; Context (archaeology); Population; Ecology; Population density; Biology; Density dependence; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.029537422868897538,"score_gpt":0.305519479235062,"score_spread":0.27598205636616446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312779280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966786,0.000059587805,0.00005458738,0.0024772007,0.000045917495,0.0002559538,0.00011283626,0.0000265473,0.00028875927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834055,0.000104276914,0.00025673505,0.00065866066,0.000028562292,0.000114092756,0.00010540604,0.000008432326,0.00038326564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751884,0.0006696613,0.00018020271,0.0003783814,0.00091595744,0.00033693228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988989,0.0006570748,0.000055151784,0.00022180776,0.000030615298,0.0001364343],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015201939,0.00008246853,0.00009729426,0.00008171813,0.0017831315,0.00003828268,0.0002505857,0.000062653446,0.001292821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061957975,0.00008897408,0.000025488156,0.0004827573,0.00027968016,0.00025473724,0.00069053035,0.0005846051,0.00015189136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046392553,0.0001114007,0.96170104,0.0000021249925,0.000005093881,0.0000053143026,0.00007722301,0.00088920956,0.000076982236,0.00016041446,0.03564518,0.0012796497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026325128,0.00008380796,0.9866142,0.000006346631,0.000003864036,0.000010089843,0.00013814725,0.00068195787,0.000010277541,0.0046618804,0.0074313353,0.00009479686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002533238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000383998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028213844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002496823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003030353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313012103","doi":"10.1071/wr22070","title":"Evaluation of oral baits and distribution methods for Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii)†","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Veterinary Oncology Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Captivity; Wildlife; Biology; Rodenticide; Context (archaeology); Palatability; Population; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Zoology; Ecology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.3683504722524182,"score_gpt":0.5847701232016518,"score_spread":0.2164196509492336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313012103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760863,0.0019735757,0.005187837,0.011148819,0.00015522333,0.0042639356,0.00025379824,0.00003650972,0.00089398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810762,0.00007173566,0.016502379,0.0001102281,0.00010294331,0.0013516133,0.00030790915,0.00003251253,0.00044451456],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234945,0.0041086157,0.00033276321,0.00043012653,0.002195048,0.000583981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664134,0.00089447503,0.00006607336,0.00039263556,0.0017735546,0.00023194413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03746752,0.000111221205,0.0003547293,0.00035086655,0.0005280629,0.000019693094,0.00021355666,0.000092071925,0.0004858909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047653313,0.0001081502,0.0000766138,0.00075941125,0.00036007643,0.00008704009,0.00051121286,0.0006582433,0.000007108318],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043805162,0.0011457145,0.029180149,0.0007258867,0.00046573952,0.000066177985,0.0009029824,0.00008585143,0.07320415,0.0016366595,0.04224391,0.8459623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022660848,0.028668161,0.21857436,0.00020113026,0.0008091189,0.0026677067,0.0034981817,0.18777755,0.0032140224,0.012474826,0.5188262,0.00062789425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008319247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007771902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84533435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007535405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012478248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99112976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429964","doi":"10.1071/wr22005","title":"‘It’s a people problem, not a goat problem.’ Mitigating human–mountain goat interactions in a Canadian Provincial Park","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Human–wildlife conflict; Context (archaeology); National park; Wildlife management; Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Ecology","score_opus":0.0551905491669633,"score_gpt":0.348057412279052,"score_spread":0.2928668631120887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313429964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9376429,0.0000024830974,0.000004065161,0.038656186,0.00008140819,0.0015454682,0.000023865483,0.00009306425,0.021950576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905767,0.0000075832118,0.0002923346,0.0020592571,0.00013785012,0.0014277622,0.000077869736,0.000034534238,0.0053860974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602836,0.00059073605,0.0004647173,0.00064166676,0.00077522726,0.0014992744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867994,0.00040753392,0.000080991835,0.00036121238,0.0000537071,0.0004166112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003823919,0.000190241,0.00022981432,0.00053798856,0.0011048025,0.00013010846,0.00050893216,0.00014893842,0.0011773676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005656615,0.00020132029,0.00006220405,0.0024826291,0.00031587266,0.0005377118,0.00040506187,0.0010057654,0.003668298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002506392,0.00007920249,0.918201,0.000034073353,0.00000932259,0.000051341834,0.0033080142,0.00034189507,0.00068345794,0.0005578731,0.07595106,0.00075768767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048243973,0.0001165419,0.95279574,0.000120829536,0.0000049621117,0.000013700933,0.0013989175,0.0033075504,0.00003183166,0.0021578271,0.039287582,0.00028204953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6591874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98021334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32102597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016826722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006692191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320186152","doi":"10.1071/wr22078","title":"Habitat structure facilitates coexistence of native and invasive mesopredators in an Australian tropical savanna","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rio Tinto; Department of Education, Skills and Employment, Australian Government","keywords":"Ecology; Feral cat; Threatened species; Habitat; Geography; Population; Mesopredator release hypothesis; Biology; Apex predator; Predation","score_opus":0.07565060742899311,"score_gpt":0.3524128551539755,"score_spread":0.2767622477249824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320186152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99646163,0.0000112227635,9.988332e-7,0.0029224209,0.00003251644,0.0002752039,0.000034297827,0.000021526237,0.0002401917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921066,0.00003429277,0.00014278736,0.00013248967,0.000014858327,0.000024730338,0.000021563186,0.000007233767,0.0004113972],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809074,0.00045384755,0.00021729413,0.00036841328,0.00046876812,0.00040092375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902195,0.00056121696,0.000036966143,0.0002057753,0.00003948546,0.00013461802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006040625,0.000099351084,0.00016352035,0.0001750056,0.00013650274,0.00001952698,0.00026206663,0.00013328312,0.0003213993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073409843,0.00009065757,0.000019662724,0.0009142751,0.0010460975,0.0003422187,0.0002442054,0.00034562757,0.00010582904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004820253,0.000037380785,0.9917351,0.0000192139,0.000005647789,0.000017717199,0.0022683886,0.00012464666,0.0011952367,0.00021979098,0.003903906,0.0004247459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026165543,0.00029534058,0.992004,0.000019778729,0.0000016890398,0.0000023214898,0.0025157651,0.00029255776,0.0002793908,0.0039027599,0.00033902747,0.00008573755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041531216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046964055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042810934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009480047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050428433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38543898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321349687","doi":"10.1071/wr22113","title":"Is regional variability in environmental conditions driving differences in the early body condition of endemic Australian fur seal pups?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Fur seal; Phenology; Biology; Seasonal breeder; Range (aeronautics); Juvenile; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Population; Zoology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.10631557473426198,"score_gpt":0.36356293334661777,"score_spread":0.2572473586123558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321349687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99376595,0.000008518409,0.0000010962741,0.0032666726,0.000019513855,0.00046728645,0.00005617734,0.000014041975,0.0024007272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990654,0.00022292312,0.000013042494,0.00017387839,0.000031069485,0.00013736608,0.00003498708,0.000008438736,0.00031289697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965083,0.0009759025,0.0003566931,0.0004175056,0.0011790892,0.0005624931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986206,0.0009194662,0.000060730345,0.00031566372,0.000006356009,0.00007717546],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003655481,0.00012691169,0.00020386385,0.00013750448,0.00020562016,0.000027073538,0.0005351971,0.00008488959,0.0028373147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020245175,0.000102551305,0.00006205416,0.0009986135,0.00083199004,0.0002112833,0.00054452516,0.0005443269,0.00050615973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001083158,0.0001518947,0.98991334,0.000018757457,0.000007879527,0.000014587367,0.0011605979,0.000012856332,0.0007434623,0.00041181128,0.0072522135,0.0003017815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022700627,0.00011284969,0.9933806,0.0000343314,0.000003059734,0.0000030041604,0.0010365121,0.00024110045,0.000025511326,0.0027573397,0.0020827975,0.000095891846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045318906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017767468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052994317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003235966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022107643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391776760","doi":"10.1071/wr23041","title":"Seasonal nest use of sympatric North American flying squirrels","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Manitoba; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sympatric speciation; Nest (protein structural motif); Wildlife management; Ecology; Wildlife; Geography; Biodiversity; Wildlife conservation; Biology","score_opus":0.11750716713537246,"score_gpt":0.37885415342303924,"score_spread":0.2613469862876668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391776760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981232,0.00012962347,0.000024939774,0.00059254037,0.000058080288,0.00014241111,0.000011198415,0.000045128592,0.0008728232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979343,0.00025164263,0.0001675432,0.000059550453,0.000051007984,0.00002956119,0.000003750881,0.000013199192,0.0014894712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830776,0.00016908906,0.00015458977,0.00032129418,0.00059685577,0.00045038614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923384,0.00046576143,0.000023147233,0.00014292047,0.00002442321,0.00010988386],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048745604,0.00009404915,0.00015648776,0.000102917256,0.00031867358,0.000041707386,0.00019909433,0.00003498346,0.00052278285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015641577,0.00007762201,0.000061732455,0.0013618694,0.0012001046,0.00019895578,0.00045217294,0.00043102613,0.0010068566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018502293,0.00006288439,0.9620908,0.000017066635,0.000013903081,0.00005812461,0.00024174416,0.00007008628,0.00019853833,0.000075353135,0.008272558,0.028880427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041142554,0.00023951089,0.9733919,0.000013074957,0.00001117817,0.000006097107,0.00015761348,0.0010202369,0.000015174572,0.000014312192,0.025004797,0.000084945685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011806795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007279108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02879548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013977593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041357183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399349963","doi":"10.1071/wr23082","title":"Leopards at large: population density, habitat utilisation and spatio-temporal overlap of leopards (Panthera pardus) with competitors and prey in the Rajaji Tiger Reserve, northern India","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Panthera; Leopard; Tiger; Predation; Wildlife conservation; Population; Habitat; Wildlife management; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.02752629937162461,"score_gpt":0.2980428490669745,"score_spread":0.2705165496953499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399349963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99631,0.00017263003,0.000016127671,0.0022681353,0.000055106335,0.00053801533,0.000012654408,0.000020464471,0.0006068778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930406,0.000064174965,0.000077433084,0.0001472622,0.00005088418,0.000046078352,0.00007074303,0.000015374833,0.00022399607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756855,0.0006549289,0.0002595064,0.000387199,0.0007913381,0.00033845875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999194,0.00038039614,0.000060605566,0.00025437417,0.000040857012,0.00006973138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028389292,0.00013275885,0.00017433403,0.00014237224,0.0002955863,0.00008474946,0.0001666881,0.00012550947,0.00013195553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001460186,0.00009550354,0.000024371064,0.0005565788,0.00044661722,0.00038693074,0.00023204471,0.00035916787,0.00003764174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017807537,0.00005922652,0.9951181,0.00005294915,0.000012529175,0.000016225822,0.0019996823,0.00007870327,0.000027703207,0.00030886938,0.0015017458,0.00064621906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037495242,0.00017978738,0.99311894,0.0000711294,0.000009317929,0.00001313826,0.0005528709,0.0031945463,0.000014968817,0.0005758899,0.00178836,0.0001060856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003274743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07293925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0696645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017301076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005328474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9439772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403589979","doi":"10.1071/wr24027","title":"Spatiotemporal responses of ungulates to hunting in a fenced multi-use area","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.11882055972824747,"score_gpt":0.3764363112048725,"score_spread":0.257615751476625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403589979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950387,0.000040754032,0.00012419524,0.0039689313,0.000071326365,0.0003342737,0.0000064125193,0.000037410762,0.00037798713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533063,0.000014308263,0.00183929,0.00027617434,0.000021873884,0.00004954593,0.00000436833,0.000012705456,0.0024511002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818915,0.00034939309,0.00027396507,0.00035605984,0.00044228142,0.00038913754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870914,0.0009181703,0.000023198067,0.0002296781,0.000028437504,0.0000913819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021557657,0.00008763251,0.00013112553,0.0003181387,0.00010101865,0.000060222304,0.0002332092,0.00009687843,0.00044824812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015142163,0.000082581704,0.000034070377,0.001326315,0.00023338017,0.00034577757,0.00026841485,0.00030952072,0.00048605166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009339294,0.00006284538,0.98927695,0.000018797464,0.000005460194,0.00003515155,0.0008496739,0.00039699208,0.0030793124,0.00013487149,0.0032104105,0.0028361657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014706657,0.00008793607,0.9850243,0.00012472375,0.0000017125969,0.000002373348,0.00018296846,0.009180993,0.00044983285,0.00019259386,0.004514394,0.000091103495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033738143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002647573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008784001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001650736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008711396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6247373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404711839","doi":"10.1071/wr24063","title":"Influence of stand thinning on wildlife in managed second-growth forests: tree squirrels, small mustelids, and mammalian species richness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Wildlife; Ecology; Thinning; Biodiversity; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Biology; Agroforestry; Fauna; Geography","score_opus":0.03856821170470881,"score_gpt":0.2898496809709604,"score_spread":0.2512814692662516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404711839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98538417,0.0002950599,0.00002672618,0.0039762952,0.00007894906,0.0004635934,0.000014728295,0.000055537268,0.009704974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99585795,0.00013905116,0.00015378249,0.0008072288,0.00006658192,0.000062503364,0.00000689904,0.000029104724,0.0028769132],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715954,0.0004120653,0.0004385212,0.0006599269,0.00071016804,0.00061979727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985198,0.00085752417,0.00006037469,0.00036522432,0.000042219814,0.00015485784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025510015,0.00021297275,0.00027581287,0.00044297738,0.000227588,0.0001124564,0.00045526816,0.00019797662,0.00032814473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047229743,0.00019673009,0.000047163343,0.0012754253,0.0008429506,0.00048442718,0.00041590034,0.0008146507,0.00017246774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011947317,0.00007972832,0.9818311,0.00024580525,0.00001873684,0.00014211609,0.0009306283,0.0009985488,0.00025372906,0.0045586643,0.009962633,0.0008588913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004152589,0.00023482884,0.986763,0.00030604872,0.0000070086667,0.000011001989,0.0005405124,0.0010131104,0.000106306,0.0032764573,0.007125575,0.00020087163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000411299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029122753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010473798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027037892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009133025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80224204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408082197","doi":"10.1071/wr24132","title":"Evidence for an ecological two-population model for white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in Australian waters","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Carcharias; White (mutation); Fishery; Wildlife management; Population; Geography; Ecology; Fauna; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Biology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.24708537243472908,"score_gpt":0.456880902545841,"score_spread":0.20979553011111193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408082197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98665684,0.00001043843,0.0033731444,0.0073927683,0.0001292317,0.0016353446,0.000022037217,0.000028779426,0.0007514022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99022096,0.000023160743,0.0028422337,0.0005171787,0.000058249985,0.0010492214,0.00008260175,0.000009362647,0.0051970338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782574,0.0003440451,0.00026351825,0.0005890409,0.00020481124,0.00077283045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999037,0.0005001788,0.000025057001,0.00029039237,0.00003707308,0.00011025221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003042952,0.00012225505,0.00019386872,0.00017460613,0.0002574074,0.000024251589,0.0004877625,0.00021941775,0.00020706395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006880221,0.000104810424,0.000060076723,0.000280702,0.00034171477,0.00025379,0.00038915634,0.00032648665,0.000039192935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013093423,0.00023683731,0.93465656,0.00006306459,0.000012438904,0.0000028710328,0.0005656148,0.03417475,0.0022549336,0.003210467,0.015877139,0.007635965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010091603,0.0005604198,0.6579283,0.000042614476,0.000009012614,0.000001559472,0.000093118084,0.3181937,0.00007829274,0.01951925,0.0023853446,0.00017923144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016160951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053099357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28401896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033613393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005335159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4274045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415943273","doi":"10.1071/wr25020","title":"Investigations into aerial shooting approaches to achieve rapid removal of feral and pest animals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife management; Wildlife; Pest control; Wildlife conservation; Aerial photography; Aerial survey; Integrated pest management; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.14207352698427836,"score_gpt":0.32909321585534,"score_spread":0.18701968887106166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415943273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96810544,0.000050395854,0.00017519004,0.021323906,0.000064045395,0.00038031608,0.0000028486184,0.000019469493,0.009878367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991632,0.000013607817,0.0066936454,0.0007491394,0.000068972455,0.000057653102,0.0000056049457,0.0000073912975,0.0007720146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984096,0.000353749,0.00024831336,0.00033916623,0.00033252122,0.00031661175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992565,0.00032797325,0.000037634494,0.00021968017,0.000024773044,0.00013347092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017389897,0.00009229722,0.00015416386,0.00015679142,0.00039195796,0.000038647293,0.00024659862,0.00010494634,0.00015278209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008393354,0.0000914174,0.00002645971,0.000796387,0.00061333866,0.00014339364,0.00050132594,0.0002585304,0.00006932879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000160195,0.000074356925,0.9611653,0.000038242277,0.000021329635,0.0000058459777,0.0013204385,0.00019429458,0.0040458487,0.013071346,0.009153001,0.010749766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004414543,0.00028500188,0.96959054,0.000059181995,0.0000110143565,0.000011024296,0.00077293307,0.001933723,0.0004515427,0.014628177,0.01165824,0.00015716947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000569973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034136986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02352651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010157927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010041063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37278935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116677567","doi":"10.1071/wr25057","title":"Did curiosity kill the cat? The impacts of aerial baiting and Felixer deployment on feral cat populations on Three Hummock Island, Tasmania","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; Biodiversity; Endangered species; Invasive species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Foraging","score_opus":0.0755863473843224,"score_gpt":0.43764586159644014,"score_spread":0.36205951421211774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116677567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912551,0.00018980297,0.000016315918,0.0056282873,0.00015969078,0.00036451913,0.000031402582,0.000006307477,0.0023485871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810874,0.0001419349,0.000019841851,0.00071925874,0.00030099307,0.000044805805,0.000018767478,0.000012087708,0.0006335777],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867517,0.00022885345,0.00020084191,0.00027495026,0.00032765212,0.00029255598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991412,0.00017778482,0.000055298955,0.0003923698,0.00018769616,0.00004560652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061630114,0.00012165709,0.00013214337,0.00007098954,0.0006513461,0.00006696,0.0002253221,0.000070827926,0.000018527857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005179656,0.000071759634,0.000064217544,0.00013088282,0.00021745026,0.000004610883,0.00035217308,0.00021747773,0.000012615718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002982179,0.00071931246,0.31940976,0.0001439888,0.00090310565,0.00000992586,0.0021687278,0.00028141408,0.33063567,0.014656461,0.32467616,0.0034132812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022991276,0.002283274,0.8100227,0.0003709409,0.000098969766,0.00001666731,0.0020993573,0.0005601882,0.072826296,0.0017328053,0.10718784,0.00050181645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000821462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005597625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49061295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051710944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007904325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50096935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}