{"meta":{"query_hash":"96305924bf00","filters":{"venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice"},"cohort_total":277,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":277,"exported":277,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/96305924bf00","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Windsor+Yearbook+of+Access+to+Justice"},"results":[{"id":"W140134012","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4492","title":"Judging Fairness in Class Action Settlements","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Political science; Civil procedure; Doctrine; Face (sociological concept); Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; History; Epistemology; State (computer science); Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.043845894160854444,"score_gpt":0.313256852687802,"score_spread":0.2694109585269476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140134012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8227123,0.000006705522,0.0009713193,0.0022929562,0.0018908057,0.0003890094,0.000006117343,0.00011117623,0.17161962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970313,0.0000030013534,0.00015133603,0.0014137862,0.0008274859,0.00003145559,0.000012169311,0.00002335549,0.00050616794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988953,0.0000071340273,0.00028970587,0.00025123364,0.0002816683,0.0002749995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993893,0.000032792414,0.00016641676,0.0002509827,0.00013422132,0.000026274898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023669946,0.00013521724,0.0001686133,0.00049500883,0.00009825396,0.00027005235,0.00040752217,0.0000838436,0.0006998854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014487536,0.00014220196,0.000053147243,0.0006474764,0.000036886613,0.0016447757,0.00022863336,0.0002547126,0.00036410705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006523797,0.0023056713,0.28983766,0.0036063155,0.00020327447,0.000056484,0.00046414687,0.0060433177,0.16448495,0.32591066,0.088445194,0.11798995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010964491,0.00001255306,0.43006772,0.00014213377,0.00019396757,0.000002113172,0.0007466105,0.0063107475,0.001558136,0.0007158469,0.55870336,0.00045039027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051616697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089199765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47025815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035663765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003299226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7663255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145186697","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4486","title":"Restricted Access to Justice for Canadians Mistreated Abroad: Abdelrazik v Canada (Re: Interim Costs)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Interim; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Law; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Supreme court","score_opus":0.06186903985694005,"score_gpt":0.35474511483047955,"score_spread":0.2928760749735395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145186697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4582327,0.00004360926,0.0027670946,0.009005612,0.0034663058,0.0028289133,0.0011076648,0.00014621565,0.52240187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899794,0.000009600177,0.00079262373,0.0031855905,0.00057396234,0.00010114599,0.000046969377,0.00003100655,0.005279715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810225,0.00007621837,0.00040362627,0.00036868296,0.0005506379,0.0004985877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979962,0.00027330618,0.00020212684,0.00025392903,0.00081954803,0.00045490547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023672414,0.00018408445,0.00023965657,0.00020096716,0.0003505419,0.00019205005,0.0013737249,0.000117063915,0.0007338673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011318247,0.00020093926,0.000057761696,0.00054603175,0.00006927794,0.0005426122,0.00013151053,0.00011807267,0.000025484585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022887087,0.0005721255,0.013701114,0.00089338265,0.00047083962,0.00013959834,0.023546526,0.001214875,0.0026242167,0.11949192,0.8257183,0.009338422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022782844,0.0006505769,0.2543244,0.0008075655,0.0019114139,0.0000042533497,0.012936636,0.0006208483,0.01670905,0.0008004942,0.7069623,0.0019941647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96922076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9806328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5317467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008074135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016699014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8194065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1479723212","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4319","title":"OVERCOMING OBSTACLES TO IMPLEMENTING THE UN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Political science; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.02855156058988326,"score_gpt":0.302471316595245,"score_spread":0.2739197560053617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1479723212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787718,0.000039471684,0.000017113425,0.0013361091,0.00027053308,0.0013234055,0.000008778427,0.0000063426305,0.018226445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998816,0.00006546569,0.00012851943,0.00038512595,0.00021361432,0.000019863948,0.0000018659632,0.000008378413,0.00036112606],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983152,0.00023418904,0.00037439956,0.00016411913,0.00047547065,0.0004365914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833244,0.0009245161,0.00020336504,0.00024282692,0.00019943672,0.00009742027],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081220927,0.00009780673,0.00015343286,0.00010526127,0.0021250881,0.00008639929,0.0006678487,0.000043955297,0.00024208962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006113915,0.0000590764,0.000026070755,0.0004139893,0.000055247492,0.0002234169,0.000011824861,0.00011509443,0.000017256365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002595339,0.00010606551,0.019136274,0.000120885255,0.000029470686,0.0000012920586,0.9151298,0.00041903433,0.000121103774,0.06291376,0.000889111,0.0011072633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042682947,0.00017240473,0.6330849,0.00042042613,0.00014247105,9.893815e-7,0.19269514,0.00006240861,0.013537331,0.003340541,0.15555537,0.00056120334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99965364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72243464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035381693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008548778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491303487","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4567","title":"Access to Justice for the Wrongfully Accused in National Security Investigations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Complaint; Commission; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Law; Terrorism; National security; Espionage; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.09509475235539169,"score_gpt":0.40925083648437155,"score_spread":0.3141560841289799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491303487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56578785,0.0000762849,0.004015,0.07814203,0.002205979,0.004751957,0.00025304934,0.00015832842,0.3446095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842835,0.0000045920683,0.00080751715,0.007539164,0.0010526946,0.00010587983,0.000009697561,0.000011494213,0.0020405871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981869,0.00008258728,0.00035304937,0.00028420513,0.00076829654,0.00032494747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997962,0.00085644424,0.00013393439,0.00017940131,0.00069924106,0.00016899972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008262055,0.00013117887,0.00017177715,0.00024536217,0.0005452502,0.0004062158,0.0015335634,0.000091090544,0.00025259546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014980432,0.000111122616,0.0000697272,0.00036556198,0.00013779526,0.0008807656,0.0001122202,0.00015352272,0.000048656333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008652913,0.00008362176,0.00021720986,0.00004180397,0.00001670839,0.0000012890333,0.0048018936,0.0017757142,0.00010112797,0.9780406,0.014617802,0.00021570717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015183238,0.00027498248,0.14573322,0.00032282725,0.0005199796,0.0000012713257,0.001344168,0.001611976,0.0019506186,0.5982845,0.24763517,0.0008029834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008291453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004906262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4226405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017899253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005167968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45314488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495515455","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4538","title":"Creeping Capitalism and Academic Culture at a Canadian Law School","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporatization; Scholarship; Restructuring; Commodification; Academic freedom; Marketization; Capitalism; Autonomy; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law; Higher education; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.09399959374712731,"score_gpt":0.3947832737597534,"score_spread":0.3007836800126261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495515455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39903304,0.00038267838,0.000018642522,0.037995268,0.0005323701,0.00043342958,0.00002438389,0.000049799775,0.56153035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809325,0.00016791248,0.00047720305,0.009376314,0.00048058762,0.000015669706,0.0000048154066,0.0000101575915,0.008534859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990522,0.00006970104,0.00018770895,0.00017491984,0.00025756643,0.0002578856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897796,0.00011028575,0.00009588625,0.00013402279,0.00022564914,0.00045620522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002946769,0.000079584715,0.00010800984,0.00013714093,0.000871371,0.00010610204,0.00032361716,0.00013985804,0.00070980185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011042744,0.000084366795,0.000020379895,0.00043104604,0.00022164252,0.0011322915,0.000064178836,0.00033772457,0.00015204262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057740144,0.00006747971,0.025526468,0.00013382206,0.000071984316,0.00003827539,0.19290406,0.000056602956,0.0016645498,0.46951956,0.30913645,0.00082303194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014488239,0.000016195903,0.021391584,0.000040286333,0.000058756177,0.0000107156275,0.0046294588,0.00000533611,0.00019171897,0.0003367945,0.973001,0.0001732425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4158115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22609837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66386455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019079869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010550119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7880233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498048561","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4490","title":"Mediation in Guardianship Proceedings for the Elderly: An Australian Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Mediation; Tribunal; Adjudication; Legislature; Conciliation; Political science; Law; Legislation; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Business","score_opus":0.05974593685152559,"score_gpt":0.3905966113846639,"score_spread":0.3308506745331383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498048561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96397495,0.00004475999,0.00006100865,0.013768633,0.0006366146,0.0012373003,0.00000872752,0.00004811943,0.020219887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765754,0.000031542702,0.00041195302,0.0002575455,0.0009453605,0.00009511995,0.0000010567533,0.000013579343,0.0005863006],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990159,0.00002881601,0.00016353239,0.00022018941,0.0002875025,0.00028404838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990988,0.00028299837,0.00008249408,0.00012867701,0.0002968828,0.00011016273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070670835,0.0000878318,0.00012789645,0.00012576322,0.00023167461,0.00015658069,0.00062496297,0.00011910561,0.00011172264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093687855,0.00007355213,0.0000465069,0.00039762494,0.00012710654,0.0006507924,0.00003153196,0.0002194434,0.000014055494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008625547,0.0007153532,0.0807925,0.000401551,0.00016384861,0.0000071384516,0.5715371,0.0001465702,0.042843472,0.20852649,0.044258006,0.049745426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00344105,0.0015383443,0.47212362,0.0004884336,0.0010230845,0.0000032297694,0.29560825,0.00043826923,0.029795744,0.032349773,0.16155982,0.0016303932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032459416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016894253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3913311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050840536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016685572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.942739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501971436","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4541","title":"The Exploitation of Vulnerability: Dimensions of Citizenship and Rightlessness in Canada’s Security Certificate Legislation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Carleton University","keywords":"Statelessness; Citizenship; Political science; Vulnerability (computing); Deportation; Agency (philosophy); Exploit; Legislation; National security; Certificate; Naturalisation; Law; Computer security; Sociology; Immigration; Politics","score_opus":0.08796027915575023,"score_gpt":0.3232802954573143,"score_spread":0.23532001630156407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501971436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950287,0.00013218234,0.0001170413,0.0006047006,0.00013544489,0.00030289651,0.0000127073945,0.00000542315,0.003660952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994886,0.00022590796,0.00006413711,0.000026289435,0.000041743755,0.000010600235,0.000004048503,0.00000468079,0.00013399578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987402,0.00022197957,0.00039503956,0.00013996636,0.00037358768,0.00012922913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880314,0.00045580906,0.00021838228,0.00015743665,0.00031044203,0.0000548028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056509045,0.00006733542,0.00016415368,0.00008075269,0.00023848798,0.000016401398,0.00018446024,0.000047610258,0.00002145943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068060134,0.00004948008,0.000021688635,0.00024304778,0.00022017177,0.00025106515,0.000025267598,0.00007753658,4.877315e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008192118,0.0003955304,0.42119467,0.00072978303,0.00011786469,0.000006300173,0.4115373,0.00307113,0.019059844,0.11860617,0.012797013,0.011665183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063919835,0.00011850837,0.90985775,0.00023850406,0.000110458845,0.0000010049686,0.036792792,0.0018127346,0.030650886,0.014477086,0.004971658,0.0003294051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5253847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9211949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4886631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010204935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000736621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47777578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505233863","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4309","title":"LA CYBERJUSTICE COMME RÉPONSE AUX BESOINS JURIDIQUES DES PERSONNES ITINÉRANTES: SON POTENTIEL ET SES EMBÛCHES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050029427945846174,"score_gpt":0.30590958870803,"score_spread":0.2558801607621838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505233863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90049386,0.00039260348,0.079799496,0.0034834195,0.0004017566,0.0006685679,0.000015884016,0.0005073935,0.014237001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961752,0.00014246222,0.035035547,0.0018276358,0.00019602485,0.00007575869,0.0000033621884,0.000041014915,0.0009261753],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775267,0.0002810633,0.0004733474,0.00052996166,0.00044664874,0.0005163224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978036,0.00064673397,0.00022365508,0.0006349891,0.00043690723,0.0002541052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063393806,0.00030247887,0.00034474756,0.00030642698,0.000274168,0.00083333434,0.0015205784,0.00015882235,0.00012780986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007112123,0.00028603623,0.00013288169,0.00053256913,0.00018023384,0.002120404,0.0005684157,0.0003090157,0.0003383075],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008959269,0.0039599044,0.0133986585,0.0076402314,0.0011073609,0.0005884078,0.10970451,0.003333582,0.20753694,0.06485754,0.1285717,0.45840526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005692883,0.004107906,0.35428697,0.0055384114,0.0023552452,0.0009080043,0.027552918,0.06697303,0.4186047,0.022579866,0.08461067,0.0067893886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016971591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010315526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45161584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005059567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021332955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508301403","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4500","title":"A Wavering Commitment? Administrative Independence and Collaborative Governance in Ontario’s Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability Legislation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Statute; Legislation; Independence (probability theory); Corporate governance; Public administration; Legislature; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.05378763993765281,"score_gpt":0.37590865109594346,"score_spread":0.32212101115829067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508301403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8754204,0.00010975338,0.00008852586,0.0009575376,0.0003573463,0.0011233006,0.00006709066,0.000030296354,0.12184575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968996,0.000016649396,0.0021868173,0.0001306023,0.00010437821,0.0000745867,0.0000023794282,0.000010585966,0.0005744105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980086,0.00018713369,0.0003862355,0.0004205881,0.00067069556,0.00032671925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823,0.00056513725,0.0003270334,0.00029048655,0.00041014963,0.00017720717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010606217,0.00016641697,0.00031611376,0.00008043256,0.00020441815,0.0001787162,0.0006116586,0.0001821978,0.00043764655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016798388,0.00017666616,0.000029724983,0.00062772253,0.00053663854,0.0015764947,0.0002298768,0.00058810366,0.000015909043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006084229,0.0003881752,0.34311467,0.00008599284,0.00006694309,0.000016283491,0.5981036,0.00007420034,0.0015771601,0.052898247,0.00031486526,0.0027514251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009232204,0.00019135298,0.93144935,0.00016618686,0.00010318205,6.707791e-7,0.012280886,0.000034953846,0.002763307,0.0026393104,0.04899996,0.00044758723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08916053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59436524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5883347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033976487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010499412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9169048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510901266","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4362","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS OF INDEPENDENT COURTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Judicial independence; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Independence (probability theory); Separation of powers; Commit; Constitutional law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Legislature; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07902777010930453,"score_gpt":0.36232026323610345,"score_spread":0.28329249312679894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510901266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71679676,0.0019501441,0.0012937975,0.012747036,0.0020354863,0.0013196521,0.00006072784,0.000047270336,0.26374912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967917,0.00019141957,0.00017124279,0.0017138849,0.00089666183,0.00004031279,0.0000011051089,0.000006225586,0.00018744155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828297,0.00011467979,0.000309579,0.0001889826,0.00075566774,0.00034814217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986664,0.00047352555,0.00014906321,0.00014725841,0.00033296988,0.00023075401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009549787,0.00012886224,0.00027478454,0.00011255032,0.00064825534,0.00010577178,0.00071722444,0.0000771018,0.000099317236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012579706,0.00009844812,0.00005644728,0.00037554148,0.0009897194,0.00074284605,0.00047138412,0.00012609003,0.000035723944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006237967,0.00027528728,0.02384686,0.00022282016,0.00016444296,0.0000046045616,0.014404914,0.00068197114,0.00023066108,0.9501222,0.004881991,0.004540451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022691796,0.00013358226,0.84968495,0.00048750907,0.0023946676,0.000009663307,0.009975705,0.000028986757,0.0015752058,0.008711112,0.12399492,0.0007345319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00412478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008749999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005945157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029146374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6235461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512049890","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4497","title":"TRANSNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: PAPERS FROM THE SIXTH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DISCUSSION FORUM, QUÉBEC CITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Accountability; Law; Windsor; Adjudication; Comparative law; Public administration; International law; State (computer science); Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.10194180228626822,"score_gpt":0.3794893752739952,"score_spread":0.277547572987727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512049890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24263592,0.00004815677,0.00003381627,0.047424376,0.00030641656,0.00045636197,0.00024541726,0.000030813346,0.70881873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589205,0.000007263534,0.0003030376,0.0017881957,0.00025917048,0.000019238085,0.000011253199,0.0000074249115,0.0017123497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986679,0.00015343315,0.00025841448,0.0002701231,0.0004657253,0.00018440823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984981,0.0008850297,0.0001393853,0.00012924087,0.00021721469,0.00013101839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002613134,0.00014626507,0.00019939926,0.000019698096,0.0007044974,0.00020076898,0.0004994727,0.00005638121,0.00047959498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001893727,0.00008944973,0.000059282916,0.000095634474,0.001197093,0.0004895211,0.000098231256,0.00024638677,0.000010120203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001194874,0.000069155874,0.0014240441,0.0000055148366,0.00006387341,0.0000018218765,0.019474115,0.0000027952017,0.00075603987,0.9770968,0.00078758295,0.00019877376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076366775,0.00033507598,0.13460037,0.000071921444,0.0002384471,0.0000011537417,0.054444205,0.000028401184,0.003996596,0.005278476,0.79978603,0.0004556368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012684124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37716094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032319098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002544373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514920947","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4528","title":"The Scope of the Obligation to Respect and to Ensure Respect for International Humanitarian Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; International humanitarian law; Geneva Conventions; Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; International law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.040371565185325295,"score_gpt":0.36079920651107594,"score_spread":0.32042764132575063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514920947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6116115,0.000068014415,0.00028733988,0.036179792,0.0014746145,0.0017440617,0.00006614112,0.000029361088,0.34853917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188346,0.000004149069,0.0004466309,0.0016003392,0.0006968489,0.000016229611,0.0000013346954,0.000006381472,0.0053446176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895805,0.000057180234,0.00021968271,0.00016361798,0.00045131485,0.00015012492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889755,0.00025172863,0.000101046884,0.00016773291,0.00051184976,0.00007007842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057835516,0.00007028389,0.00009842711,0.000073258234,0.00053467375,0.00019574308,0.0008229567,0.000039043458,0.000045461373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005851139,0.000047469326,0.000046528297,0.000106885265,0.00011250103,0.00018984171,0.00009202262,0.00006138041,0.000009449662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015397831,0.000018850438,0.000028782593,0.000006480155,0.000014033481,2.6525097e-7,0.0026670918,0.000054929587,0.0008267114,0.9923722,0.003263774,0.00059288257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069039804,0.00057387596,0.12745278,0.00038167485,0.00014415455,8.665929e-7,0.0007807825,0.000023996257,0.016703384,0.2423514,0.6105601,0.0003365844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077822123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008147997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7500208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006394286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008172312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45467737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516494379","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4489","title":"Brave New Words: Labour, The Courts and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Supreme court; Charter; Collective bargaining; Political science; Law; Labour law; Politics; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.014987846948611636,"score_gpt":0.286951074143666,"score_spread":0.27196322719505434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516494379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9478152,0.00012887012,0.000014602018,0.015805082,0.00047772197,0.0004908938,0.000036832414,0.000008472813,0.03522237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945366,0.00002387449,0.000089021676,0.0017583236,0.00036693123,0.0000048949314,5.421475e-7,0.000005873411,0.0032139707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992313,0.00006028255,0.00013936426,0.00012272316,0.00024217574,0.00020419782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917823,0.00020108072,0.00008263285,0.0002061952,0.0001139587,0.00021791947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005138878,0.00007268186,0.00012823504,0.00005635918,0.00046839638,0.00017957535,0.000430277,0.00006496896,0.00031970412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016742523,0.00004063548,0.000020717061,0.0001305463,0.00067003415,0.00018157407,0.000078529236,0.00014810124,0.0000018117227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035323403,0.000019237625,0.002425362,0.0000131830575,0.000046339963,0.0000017649999,0.028010195,0.0000026869716,0.00021824271,0.958968,0.007289454,0.002970213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001585741,0.0000665547,0.37320536,0.00007055866,0.00030684914,0.0000014083917,0.0028241973,0.00003730628,0.00040391902,0.031803515,0.5894442,0.00025038965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7062873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8755369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9271645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010985307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025724518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36025736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519716147","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4499","title":"The Merits of “Merits” Review: A Comparative Look at the Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Adjudication; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Enforcement; Legitimacy; Administrative law; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1242210924432735,"score_gpt":0.4465505210113872,"score_spread":0.3223294285681137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519716147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46833235,0.003171573,0.00018996354,0.13163248,0.0008684764,0.006106866,0.0005020696,0.00008571752,0.3891105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876671,0.000627254,0.00030596927,0.00072442816,0.00031245945,0.00013952322,0.0000059227623,0.000010243742,0.010207143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984289,0.00018290126,0.00041819786,0.00021381151,0.0004744689,0.000281733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811745,0.00062486023,0.00035971383,0.00042466106,0.0003243453,0.0001489804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096239237,0.0001252098,0.00027551546,0.000023262393,0.0007188083,0.000093027986,0.0011799138,0.000065968474,0.00041423584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037920257,0.00007810601,0.00010117786,0.0004096867,0.0009011023,0.0001873732,0.00020357751,0.00026879823,0.00008856183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044950494,0.00060278154,0.002201777,0.0010900702,0.0003680639,0.0000053986246,0.0390339,0.000040708153,0.030205745,0.58157414,0.33604383,0.008384077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016754892,0.00007288514,0.007694613,0.00020586255,0.00022065958,0.0000012619676,0.0025083136,0.0000059339204,0.008759325,0.0005255409,0.9796772,0.00016087104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088306324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004955811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64363337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029669567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029463024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5528565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527372535","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4614","title":"I CAN SEE CLEARLY NOW: VIDEOCONFERENCE HEARINGS AND THE LEGAL LIMIT ON HOW TRIBUNALS ALLOCATE RESOURCES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Videoconferencing; Political science; Law; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Telecommunications; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04114657717530011,"score_gpt":0.3268015283295251,"score_spread":0.28565495115422496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527372535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7018924,0.00045135326,0.00022684074,0.048301943,0.0005045377,0.0012198073,0.000021586486,0.00014455238,0.24723701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98934317,0.000044311717,0.0002873668,0.0018814007,0.0005890121,0.000016427924,6.676677e-7,0.00002455415,0.007813116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975837,0.00024250601,0.00031739584,0.00040876403,0.000853516,0.00059412146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976148,0.0012140484,0.00021290946,0.00040348506,0.00024827637,0.00030645553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002491323,0.00019858227,0.0003521882,0.00016058415,0.0004680163,0.00073748996,0.0011811253,0.00014934842,0.00008223359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017668019,0.0001540682,0.00007730898,0.00050025986,0.00096358504,0.00045899095,0.00033021948,0.00037209457,0.00006306353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060953447,0.00041138625,0.017617693,0.0004941322,0.0003605367,0.00016233315,0.65877074,0.00032848938,0.0016790241,0.27021977,0.020158155,0.023702368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020594145,0.0003958521,0.048235573,0.00031648966,0.00038934936,0.0000028504123,0.017388009,0.000070087146,0.0027225886,0.0013559577,0.9263927,0.00067113375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006177109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029648058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90623456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078235724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014262511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9337983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529402481","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4494","title":"Pre-Trial Detention and Control Orders Under British Anti-Terror Legislation Post 9/11: Balancing a Need for Security with the European Convention on Human Rights – An Overview","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Terrorism; Human rights; Legislation; Convention; Statutory law; Preventive detention; Criminal law","score_opus":0.0548211256583791,"score_gpt":0.35576050756856986,"score_spread":0.30093938191019076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529402481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912091,0.000015340273,0.0035630008,0.000784354,0.0003394098,0.0018066755,0.000040292718,0.000057490033,0.0021843435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985482,0.0000045254114,0.00011121499,0.0003986162,0.00077088404,0.000028746572,0.000035921374,0.000022111795,0.00007979294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984713,0.00042863644,0.00023762054,0.00031448467,0.00032437083,0.00022354159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990481,0.00012387041,0.00023665471,0.00021739361,0.00026897131,0.000105007275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001375099,0.00012347719,0.000163999,0.00008107569,0.0008733634,0.00045842354,0.00030410517,0.00006633524,0.000037978054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015925504,0.00010595052,0.000047101574,0.00014524949,0.00017253123,0.0010849698,0.00004415924,0.00017960767,0.00000503116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06989036,0.0060905335,0.007845245,0.007682855,0.0010982634,0.00019494788,0.07327937,0.0021191626,0.26685986,0.49830434,0.0081543075,0.058480747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.094708085,0.013602851,0.6751639,0.0031797728,0.009134307,0.00006638022,0.024244668,0.0024892078,0.0024386176,0.0063818153,0.1652541,0.0033362615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099017555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06083171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6673187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021425925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039948474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532262214","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4565","title":"Strengthening Social Justice in Informal Dispute Resolution Processes Through Cultural Competence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Mandate; Competence (human resources); Restorative justice; Sociology; Law; Economic Justice; Mediation; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04038906435525123,"score_gpt":0.29977320043594174,"score_spread":0.2593841360806905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532262214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43748572,0.000052116557,0.0013140532,0.004514031,0.00060268654,0.0005206625,0.000009156499,0.00013751122,0.5553641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97938985,0.000007556617,0.0009873707,0.018051373,0.0012954865,0.000011661583,0.000035470126,0.0000096175945,0.00021164335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987506,0.0000079584825,0.00040808614,0.00020111012,0.0003802146,0.00025199546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925274,0.00003689501,0.00024966308,0.00008926566,0.00035787676,0.000013549915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014266909,0.00015322087,0.00017213092,0.0001719349,0.00017035574,0.00032883682,0.00043521472,0.00005694739,0.00009414039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027202317,0.00014303462,0.000040957635,0.00056257175,0.000052491723,0.0046330974,0.00011617644,0.00014072604,0.00008459146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005961349,0.00044267887,0.002204751,0.0016602731,0.0000386291,0.000014375027,0.0025776129,0.0062918006,0.002511312,0.9658784,0.016119566,0.0016644115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006388396,0.0003635919,0.47098428,0.0020240133,0.0013690464,0.000011747488,0.0065326644,0.059315436,0.0059760665,0.01476742,0.42954257,0.0027247558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001621688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008621805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.951111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003406931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045842506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58327824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539021491","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4488","title":"The International Criminal Court and Non-Party States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statute; Criminal court; Declaration; Original jurisdiction; International law","score_opus":0.024809370477268774,"score_gpt":0.34007690567091314,"score_spread":0.31526753519364437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539021491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8862614,0.000008338891,0.000061237064,0.0042855865,0.0012591059,0.00014072232,0.000012613215,0.000015074617,0.1079559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903061,0.00001762894,0.00029645022,0.00045523205,0.00077137916,0.000008805114,0.0000025964655,0.000006203887,0.0081356075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991492,0.000018629764,0.00014249893,0.00012862898,0.00040537523,0.00015568985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923295,0.00024919873,0.00007116258,0.00010342167,0.00025528646,0.00008799972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041106768,0.00006174991,0.00006990946,0.000047260422,0.00042665782,0.0003035664,0.000669083,0.000041171545,0.00040897907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015734808,0.000044698823,0.000025078247,0.000029808592,0.00027999017,0.00027670327,0.0001125527,0.00013324906,0.000044088785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007614876,0.00004143148,0.0012593805,0.000016957467,0.000033017306,0.0000038803337,0.0050455406,0.000011666595,0.0010183738,0.98168284,0.009918122,0.00089265476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053270755,0.00008987102,0.10678582,0.00006006579,0.00017836057,0.000003473755,0.0020417133,0.00048495957,0.0036626756,0.058055747,0.82776994,0.00033466902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008627044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037920745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9236271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001736131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009615764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44780338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540821484","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4312","title":"A BRIEF GENEALOGY OF STATE SECRECY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Intelligence, Security, War Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Office of the Director of National Intelligence","keywords":"Secrecy; Variety (cybernetics); State (computer science); Law; Government (linguistics); Discipline; Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; History; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04921784576711771,"score_gpt":0.3539854025492005,"score_spread":0.3047675567820828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540821484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79387075,0.00018415813,0.0012114625,0.0008520836,0.0005581561,0.00087514456,0.000028271757,0.000059430928,0.20236057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960192,0.000107226006,0.0008682062,0.0004358889,0.0002739949,0.000028866578,0.0000022312026,0.000020962576,0.002243414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981026,0.00016721485,0.0004520839,0.00028173585,0.00052929536,0.0004670873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998441,0.00022524667,0.00022584276,0.00031521788,0.00056904333,0.0002236968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046997753,0.00014182192,0.0003054584,0.00018264796,0.00012637323,0.00010498287,0.0010098326,0.00012255383,0.001999346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041378732,0.00014827082,0.00007826064,0.0004986954,0.00036500918,0.0005294978,0.00018519213,0.00015092321,0.00032146127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005787079,0.0018046481,0.033476368,0.0033893709,0.00063420366,0.000083924686,0.23190948,0.0035721927,0.05188006,0.51864135,0.052581485,0.10144819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030580116,0.0027520417,0.26219255,0.0013055798,0.0014052893,0.000018189323,0.0536769,0.0019284502,0.25827464,0.17594403,0.2350864,0.004357905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026664281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002255359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34269732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005322871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003628581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554530639","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4561","title":"Gender and Professionalism in Law: The Challenge of (Women’s) Biography","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Legal history; Law; Biography; Political science; Legal realism; Legal education; Gender studies; Legal writing; Legal practice; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.11194327707706998,"score_gpt":0.4279801340191505,"score_spread":0.31603685694208056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554530639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54420894,0.00057755824,0.000028329217,0.1074668,0.00043413526,0.00065809005,0.0000086535465,0.000024336658,0.34659314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996649,0.00008275028,0.00014451194,0.0028429434,0.000097017444,0.000018944786,7.0600447e-7,0.0000033337246,0.00016077234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913985,0.00012497937,0.00020381961,0.000114208866,0.00024772497,0.00016943245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927765,0.00025410054,0.00012306827,0.00013885577,0.00015081617,0.000055523033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009007272,0.000053922686,0.00010290656,0.00015482253,0.00014055698,0.000053623604,0.00028063645,0.0000538831,0.00020207171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036146733,0.000041767493,0.00001904412,0.00064780196,0.00019320482,0.0004969123,0.00003482037,0.0001584983,0.00000411609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034978777,0.00020833065,0.0012524744,0.000045043613,0.000011873285,5.306866e-7,0.090071194,0.0000067383803,0.0001575904,0.90476125,0.0010951327,0.0023548608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075898273,0.00018711685,0.40258735,0.00017276299,0.00011387041,7.6144227e-7,0.08152131,0.000014644924,0.000398156,0.07026816,0.4436139,0.0003630015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015125109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022284614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8344931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021499667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22864743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554624967","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4311","title":"MADE YOU LOOK: NIQABS, THE MUSLIM CANADIAN CONGRESS, AND R V NS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Mainstream; Humanities; Plaintiff; Political science; Supreme court; Ethnology; Religious studies; Sociology; Law; Art; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027964681685092137,"score_gpt":0.3053970399168472,"score_spread":0.27743235823175505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554624967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24037854,0.00027619142,0.000056212688,0.025655912,0.0006789769,0.00074230455,0.00008748384,0.000038358474,0.732086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98823166,0.000048685015,0.00011824733,0.004201224,0.0004059947,0.000020311316,0.000002224826,0.000008127676,0.006963514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897206,0.00008263586,0.00015375986,0.00015599924,0.0002574601,0.00037806394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989492,0.00022923006,0.00006570259,0.00017789194,0.00017261953,0.00040534578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021958929,0.00009201491,0.00012869787,0.00007637397,0.00047336696,0.0001868764,0.0004926365,0.00006567333,0.0008892708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002969497,0.000074220676,0.000028849532,0.00019021446,0.001045856,0.00029419022,0.00008181221,0.00011298567,0.00014280241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009516953,0.00002983897,0.013411749,0.0000590244,0.000056000605,0.000010779533,0.0074987407,0.00006880873,0.000120001925,0.9152245,0.06085775,0.0026533152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016736868,0.000037851034,0.046954226,0.00005516785,0.00014908295,0.0000032195321,0.015168008,0.000031089217,0.00008630811,0.00087271864,0.93620247,0.00027248778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51708627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090675235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91435176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006646107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013509623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564531687","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4536","title":"The Scales of Injustice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Consequentialism; Injustice; Argument (complex analysis); Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07080626815006953,"score_gpt":0.26008144673894307,"score_spread":0.18927517858887355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564531687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6519875,0.0075027035,0.0017280795,0.0027290594,0.00089364295,0.00037090428,0.00017056252,0.000032816097,0.33458477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977688,0.00041930852,0.0003038137,0.00024030641,0.0001345501,0.000013203779,8.6592064e-7,0.000006907937,0.0011122478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918216,0.000007207525,0.0004208061,0.00016480779,0.00006543553,0.00015957536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992694,0.00017273577,0.00021410437,0.00020454658,0.000091877235,0.00004732906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018744636,0.000084415056,0.00023654164,0.000077820456,0.00021841482,0.00002100091,0.00044686586,0.00003572015,0.000054636537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003395104,0.0000700739,0.000068884736,0.00022298629,0.00030309067,0.00018125105,0.000182791,0.00007358567,0.00018391579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015844723,0.00016805774,0.09160216,0.00022601684,0.00017332209,0.000007108492,0.00097412185,0.0005969649,0.00016234862,0.89239377,0.012218922,0.0013187414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079010363,0.00020485684,0.74965066,0.000093418355,0.00011051615,0.0000138617215,0.00046017484,0.00022106394,0.002022992,0.013801664,0.23214571,0.00048496074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031079055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030059293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87859213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020683196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029760133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28575307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573431212","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4562","title":"Bringing the Clinic into the 21st Century","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Ideology; Legal profession; Curriculum; Legal research; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal service; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0667829213781849,"score_gpt":0.42395261766041903,"score_spread":0.35716969628223416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573431212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038509868,0.00026085236,0.00008153881,0.27117398,0.0011789211,0.00043061894,0.0000013513163,0.000053073392,0.6883098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823856,0.00018801968,0.00023225017,0.012837206,0.000841783,0.000009528002,9.950769e-7,0.0000061303035,0.0034985242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892503,0.00016418815,0.00023750971,0.00013466546,0.0003412036,0.00019738398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985704,0.0007066153,0.00015979809,0.00028878875,0.00020729261,0.000067100984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012326592,0.0000679781,0.000083181905,0.00006709612,0.00073681463,0.00037363768,0.0008648149,0.000046989746,0.0007675167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019503383,0.000044952398,0.0000432288,0.00077543006,0.00014408525,0.0006544042,0.00006132188,0.0003018373,0.00021894142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008014198,0.00032880227,0.0017181347,0.00004591195,0.00006378128,0.0000020554744,0.25827694,0.00012360056,0.00048990006,0.48306194,0.09027388,0.16553491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007309809,0.000022862167,0.02175266,0.000021600332,0.00007842951,3.9430958e-7,0.03225032,0.000009573637,0.000083196515,0.001158635,0.94446135,0.00008790716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002310735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039716248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004392103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039204882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.840377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578760388","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4308","title":"ADVANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE THROUGH GENERIC SOLUTIONS: THE RISK OF PERPETUATING EXCLUSION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Equity (law); Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.10132671825391523,"score_gpt":0.315957939548271,"score_spread":0.21463122129435577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578760388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94773483,0.0008463996,0.016161922,0.0027496237,0.00065833784,0.0009737931,0.0000643618,0.00004057525,0.030770166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915546,0.00045768273,0.0059080506,0.0013226134,0.00024287796,0.000064490734,0.000005498607,0.00003438436,0.0004097825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982991,0.000073725234,0.0007764247,0.00028048598,0.00012762145,0.00044261446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980108,0.0004997542,0.0006039556,0.0005572755,0.00020460055,0.0001235785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008920314,0.00019102063,0.000444922,0.0002315671,0.000544243,0.00025431617,0.0013847691,0.00008965308,0.0006597284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001926091,0.00018076468,0.0001178009,0.00080195995,0.000070612616,0.0013335044,0.0012124483,0.0002593866,0.00028727422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000511401,0.0020999464,0.33760953,0.004403829,0.0016248607,0.000010555263,0.19467619,0.08928108,0.0061998433,0.062980324,0.1614742,0.13912824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092034566,0.00025619238,0.946154,0.00039805766,0.00049003266,0.000002653018,0.008783424,0.006794272,0.0012281192,0.01514212,0.018813673,0.0010170977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005622522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024690852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60854447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012781126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074376236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8499609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588872417","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4548","title":"Levinasian Ethics and Animal Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Faith; Perspective (graphical); Constructive; Animal rights; Philosophy; Normative ethics; Ethical theory; Good faith; Human rights; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.1598950080186301,"score_gpt":0.3300452242628069,"score_spread":0.1701502162441768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588872417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.484519,0.00041105435,0.000030799674,0.006932689,0.0010769314,0.0003204621,0.000071111834,0.000108751134,0.5065292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99351734,0.000043961667,0.00015499095,0.001570209,0.0016281597,0.0000070753254,0.00000466173,0.000021945876,0.0030516684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988188,0.00007579967,0.00027194803,0.0002638294,0.00033512933,0.00023446325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990851,0.00019686531,0.00009960057,0.00024601154,0.00022778157,0.00014459612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027511228,0.00016079083,0.00025066096,0.00013343956,0.00066780933,0.00013692977,0.000356129,0.00012434345,0.00042144043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015267522,0.00014623265,0.00006167926,0.00004167167,0.00060634926,0.00045645967,0.00015973515,0.00049258064,0.00009835695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002859969,0.00018628867,0.00025032036,0.0007989246,0.00010562973,0.00008763489,0.19002795,0.000010107343,0.0005333817,0.7940708,0.013433882,0.00020913177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001888295,0.0010312038,0.012166665,0.00058195385,0.00081279705,0.000081388454,0.005728413,0.000112439644,0.0029553184,0.054037206,0.9191756,0.0014287157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008612472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005089429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90574175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014023945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007082746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59631944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588943375","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4483","title":"Access to Justice for Ethno-Racial Psychiatric Consumer/Survivors in Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Ethnic group; Racism; Mental health; Affect (linguistics); Economic Justice; Psychology; Language barrier; Psychiatry; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.22256611580942937,"score_gpt":0.4722170665607697,"score_spread":0.24965095075134036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588943375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9222343,0.00011431659,0.0020208736,0.0059547527,0.0048128692,0.005094878,0.00005956346,0.000119155186,0.059589323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633286,0.000026380654,0.0122048035,0.01795013,0.0014268459,0.0011660185,0.000018131077,0.00010637436,0.0037727384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959075,0.00043751588,0.0013288524,0.0007280763,0.0005875015,0.0010105736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99500865,0.0025676969,0.00048533626,0.00077171583,0.0005160759,0.0006505489],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019862463,0.00034307718,0.00074648694,0.0005730649,0.0003582592,0.00005300223,0.0015739214,0.00044576984,0.004452589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055743577,0.00032642388,0.00012110032,0.00085423543,0.00010096743,0.00090916356,0.0006583259,0.0011690204,0.00066773186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006995594,0.0018189986,0.8150706,0.009033274,0.00016516984,0.000032799773,0.08875529,0.000102299724,0.00021823235,0.0046889833,0.068250656,0.004868089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023232012,0.0006209899,0.6406557,0.0007062537,0.001349796,0.0000011109133,0.007138827,0.000051996132,0.0002109522,0.0010092919,0.34522,0.00071187917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14975451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4280919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2783374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002556344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012302597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591884389","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4321","title":"ASSUMING REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR TRANSNATIONAL TORTS: AN INTERSTATE AFFAIR? A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CANADIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW TORT RULES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Private law; Public authority; Public law; Law and economics; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.05363717620028837,"score_gpt":0.3399906221544078,"score_spread":0.28635344595411943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591884389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54908574,0.00003719915,0.0014646337,0.17297484,0.0031413268,0.0023088986,0.00013751694,0.00012335299,0.27072647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679834,0.0000023512546,0.00054230855,0.0006647979,0.0006588893,0.00009422117,0.000008173805,0.000013954727,0.0012169497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867874,0.00008310194,0.00022018026,0.00025719157,0.00050582975,0.00025492368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987838,0.0002016721,0.00010060343,0.00016598219,0.0004998138,0.00024808748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006067471,0.00010790736,0.00013031112,0.00013565215,0.00057876547,0.00025268647,0.0005807537,0.0000942675,0.00044540697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020929157,0.000096108095,0.000079214464,0.00010564627,0.00014669981,0.00068681664,0.000032764718,0.00013734328,0.000010707577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000476381,0.000053049516,0.00020818155,0.000008897548,0.000034548197,8.147545e-7,0.009203876,0.000026619384,0.000108738284,0.9873226,0.0020166142,0.0009683693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005659396,0.00038166367,0.050619375,0.00008460702,0.00017277873,0.0000010955417,0.012446369,0.00095105066,0.00039436953,0.02489887,0.9089907,0.0004931835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14728771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25657585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020032504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033650556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85839057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600492370","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4320","title":"TRANSNATIONAL JUDICIAL AND NON-JUDICIAL REMEDIES FOR CORPORATE HUMAN RIGHTS HARMS: CHALLENGES OF AND FOR LAW","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Citizenship; International human rights law; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Accountability; Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Corporate social responsibility; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.08674591700188247,"score_gpt":0.2894710702355295,"score_spread":0.202725153233647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600492370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886509,0.000092361945,0.00042279199,0.0026470288,0.00023418399,0.0015124916,0.000032323107,0.000031572257,0.0063763065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771607,0.000003883766,0.00049912336,0.00032174605,0.0011808043,0.00011670077,0.000022857266,0.000022571896,0.00011626197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989807,0.0000047997783,0.0003483431,0.0002786078,0.00018834503,0.00019920654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989128,0.000108568885,0.00034792811,0.00011771564,0.00048524176,0.000027763263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001937802,0.00016630132,0.00033501396,0.00018347718,0.00028221362,0.00015345227,0.00021596969,0.00007460342,0.000066814304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001117412,0.00014589755,0.000052319578,0.00007285569,0.00020844408,0.0009789253,0.00008579581,0.00005198149,0.000002995846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014488379,0.00006662474,0.00019262066,0.0013174668,0.000046993744,6.1293173e-7,0.00016508022,0.000006604414,0.002149213,0.99398655,0.0015281348,0.00039523878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026617872,0.00020384548,0.042336978,0.00018407713,0.00064143096,6.539731e-7,0.00015765894,0.00091068074,0.002263016,0.93630105,0.013891148,0.0004476624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032903344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021766871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057685465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066396487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014705793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5949529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1633656768","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4310","title":"UN GRAIN DE SABLE DANS L’ENGRENAGE DU SYSTÈME JURIDIQUE. LES JUSTICIABLES NON REPRÉSENTÉS: PROBLÈMES OU SYMPTÔMES?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06830685687199746,"score_gpt":0.37099027590922573,"score_spread":0.3026834190372283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1633656768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040433,0.00021446646,0.0028244348,0.012052688,0.0009074058,0.0025688233,0.0000560856,0.00032165696,0.07701112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811828,0.00012593613,0.003249938,0.0017468217,0.0011410281,0.00017920372,0.000017814615,0.000058820366,0.012297647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685097,0.00035772545,0.00063885504,0.0005437237,0.00070119003,0.00090753403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977127,0.00033677765,0.00034588776,0.00050492823,0.000669343,0.00043037455],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009069077,0.0003192377,0.00042442678,0.0001986597,0.00062222313,0.0004954884,0.0010773703,0.0002685148,0.00060257275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015209867,0.0002939316,0.00013568248,0.00036700044,0.0005126974,0.0010450302,0.0002396593,0.00021751861,0.00017285133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013311856,0.0013400267,0.11624407,0.0038797955,0.0006870826,0.00007204142,0.37092978,0.0075037507,0.03300348,0.18399331,0.27821985,0.0039936947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025559592,0.00034712374,0.63138276,0.0021201624,0.00241291,0.000024080668,0.1710568,0.0044969944,0.03973811,0.0062033106,0.1364926,0.0031691638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038630534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029158988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51513875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084078533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010177479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1732764338","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4479","title":"Sweating it Out: Facilitating Corrections and Parole in Canada Through Aboriginal Spiritual Healing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Restorative justice; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Value (mathematics); Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07434050631534936,"score_gpt":0.36261489061458013,"score_spread":0.2882743842992308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1732764338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687936,0.00009366708,0.0016677507,0.00030065575,0.0005043057,0.00017277335,0.000012991917,0.000020503387,0.028433753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971321,0.00006427453,0.0019421597,0.0004208846,0.00015519511,0.000019087793,0.0000012949538,0.000008689874,0.00025630888],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986553,0.0000933081,0.0003456862,0.00025922834,0.00031730311,0.00032915222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991848,0.00031193916,0.00011892988,0.00012558793,0.0001504849,0.000108262146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034941707,0.00011253074,0.00022276978,0.00012973114,0.00037042913,0.00006582488,0.00024779726,0.000046181864,0.00020135668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039559745,0.00012567668,0.000036714624,0.0005185252,0.000088083485,0.0004355917,0.000054092812,0.00017228843,0.000008509871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001745723,0.0002120199,0.19501866,0.00041463185,0.00010337639,0.000050895065,0.7438537,0.0038698919,0.00034672618,0.0023096928,0.0016830195,0.05196281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019033205,0.000058741105,0.010638452,0.0001840255,0.00037435087,0.0000013256548,0.98062414,0.00080150523,0.00027403922,0.000061781604,0.0065346123,0.00025672032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98728955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99352515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23677042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002422578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009365767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5124946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173368851","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4532","title":"Feminist Debates on Civilian Women and International Humanitarian Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Mainstream; Political science; Law; Armed conflict; Inequality; Action (physics); Enforcement; Criminology; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.052135575158152606,"score_gpt":0.34538568313399376,"score_spread":0.29325010797584117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173368851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37673873,0.00005583613,0.0000101071155,0.003836462,0.00036166384,0.00018905038,0.0000110436,0.000042336946,0.6187548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325746,0.000024892615,0.000058118378,0.0038126134,0.00045850957,0.0000074940535,0.0000019528766,0.000006960616,0.0023719785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903077,0.000043231783,0.0001573653,0.0002150302,0.00029803,0.00025554458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994786,0.00007854216,0.0000644873,0.0001381702,0.00007278258,0.00016746581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027805977,0.0000965837,0.00013084516,0.000086812026,0.00025714154,0.0002240069,0.0005248098,0.00006626823,0.0003400182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012403484,0.00010110799,0.000027088568,0.000105371895,0.00014232541,0.00018562746,0.00006636228,0.00009553995,0.000038215014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024724155,0.00044360542,0.0037871571,0.000076907214,0.00008438786,0.000020263436,0.18842565,0.000036760226,0.0006194943,0.78738064,0.0051137586,0.013764144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011455816,0.00084755325,0.09665339,0.00016255601,0.00012269543,0.0000029439805,0.04152214,0.000045409288,0.00087109616,0.037604395,0.82027674,0.00074549543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008033034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011748467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.815163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059715316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055793207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4123064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1734215792","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4508","title":"Comparative Administrative Law: Outlining a Field of Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Legitimacy; Political science; Accountability; Public law; State (computer science); Field (mathematics); Comparative law; Politics; Law; Public administration; Independence (probability theory); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08280204098801151,"score_gpt":0.3681444384888115,"score_spread":0.2853423975008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1734215792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5876973,0.0000020998646,0.000087468965,0.00036280448,0.00036153148,0.00036922278,0.0000041761086,0.00002254746,0.41109282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196273,1.4055145e-7,0.00040133917,0.0068682074,0.00048261625,0.000022011554,0.0000063680654,0.000009360188,0.00024723136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990133,0.0000095002315,0.00038012944,0.00018237626,0.0002971292,0.00011758607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990075,0.00011563484,0.00029972766,0.00017223944,0.00038780496,0.00001709696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020942192,0.00011773542,0.00022906355,0.00014650649,0.00006945569,0.00013558258,0.00040807572,0.00004026108,0.00063862617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001691458,0.000108401306,0.000043845255,0.00021495779,0.00006347983,0.0009069016,0.00015426685,0.00015957697,0.00008958746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039893202,0.0011553181,0.013674945,0.00020707412,0.00015181027,0.000008032912,0.002120474,0.00010580469,0.012899669,0.96306163,0.006098034,0.000118284326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011450289,0.0034269146,0.36452365,0.0009092762,0.0029209857,0.0000079221445,0.034932688,0.011493958,0.27024946,0.020699482,0.2761448,0.0032405872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000563348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071810564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005024557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030700052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6992509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814050479","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4359","title":"STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECISION IN LENAHAN (GONZALES) AND ITS APPLICATION IN CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Human rights; Political science; Commission; Law; Domestic violence; International human rights law; Context (archaeology); State responsibility; Declaration; State (computer science); Economic Justice; International law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.051554643403361425,"score_gpt":0.3801888644527322,"score_spread":0.3286342210493708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814050479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99638283,0.00007255839,0.0001607735,0.0008868261,0.00010908544,0.0018657623,0.0000100488705,0.0000118623975,0.0005002524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994308,0.000023253366,0.000081833634,0.00011297143,0.00008550219,0.000214316,0.0000013783172,0.0000068782015,0.000043080534],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985456,0.0002602159,0.00030715973,0.00023654073,0.0003456225,0.00030484705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878687,0.0006560524,0.00017195384,0.00015224372,0.000119186334,0.000113701426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010553756,0.00011866835,0.00020516085,0.00008182986,0.00045861182,0.000036542628,0.00030366203,0.000041342977,0.000003515709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008157034,0.00008261726,0.000021759493,0.00037088286,0.00013559058,0.0002725152,0.00010498026,0.00016903471,0.0000020114824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068501406,0.0017293252,0.27754122,0.0013196375,0.000117225514,0.000010481456,0.14708672,0.0048354557,0.02697023,0.008952356,0.002119451,0.52246773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007808612,0.00018733616,0.97639215,0.0006364334,0.00004117153,2.6440665e-7,0.0063636103,0.0006090259,0.0030321274,0.0010459198,0.010578156,0.00033295387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6842364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9091976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6988509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007811092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011795874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35273176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832272874","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4369","title":"STRATEGIES OF LEGAL RUPTURE: THE POLITICS OF JUDGMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04672239609787617,"score_gpt":0.3550110150727949,"score_spread":0.30828861897491877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1832272874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6614657,0.000118521944,0.00011893511,0.00085264083,0.0004878609,0.00020655383,0.000022589242,0.0000097624325,0.33671743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947446,0.000004568326,0.00016833327,0.00014466494,0.00059257523,0.0000039100405,0.0000011274158,0.0000056149247,0.004334619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897075,0.000058681606,0.00022852693,0.000068400586,0.00047131637,0.00020233965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992684,0.00014831714,0.00015487248,0.00013974655,0.00022208001,0.00006654922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035104193,0.00006320909,0.00012975432,0.000055620527,0.00013032014,0.00004431737,0.00054451486,0.000044795917,0.00031594632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056013683,0.000044793604,0.000054648823,0.00006611415,0.00028134187,0.00043328892,0.00007171264,0.00006843301,0.00001170053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105991285,0.0000681945,0.00035018323,0.000050308554,0.000023057677,2.4800107e-7,0.0047767907,0.00004405981,0.0002563059,0.9935264,0.000867178,0.000026682997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011676716,0.0005156325,0.21266304,0.0005584806,0.0012623457,0.0000036427034,0.03934095,0.000051554587,0.06823959,0.14377633,0.5316005,0.00082027155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024249959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024995304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84975004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029130186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017867658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36658844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863832171","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4407","title":"Introduction: Re-Igniting Critical Race In Canadian Legal Spaces: Introduction To The Special Symposium Issue Of Contemporary Accounts Of Racialization In Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Race (biology); Praxis; Scholarship; Critical race theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0251121704079767,"score_gpt":0.3101698702645446,"score_spread":0.2850576998565679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863832171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7284146,0.0001281752,0.000018259198,0.24637094,0.0027873411,0.001604762,0.00003480288,0.000011657869,0.02062947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99153554,0.000018066325,0.0001230098,0.00041803485,0.0073654517,0.000040337174,0.0000046740997,0.00001066649,0.00048423608],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797493,0.00025050866,0.00055482023,0.00028609176,0.0005441918,0.00038948035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998726,0.00023092136,0.00018303633,0.00017977854,0.0005045313,0.00017570797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006478873,0.00013226744,0.00033914222,0.00018179015,0.00019973863,0.000095383795,0.0004460323,0.00008135556,0.0005867996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028460564,0.000117179654,0.00003052696,0.00086171646,0.00020386103,0.00085685187,0.000102026235,0.00017652364,0.000014169859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046820127,0.00028127083,0.15982401,0.0010564917,0.00012858874,0.000023742841,0.1710855,0.014485753,0.0065773902,0.0152180595,0.6271643,0.0036866893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080733234,0.0001465958,0.23998997,0.0003811948,0.0001402491,0.0000014723441,0.22980475,0.00028431686,0.0063049244,0.00010178108,0.5213388,0.0006985698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99675995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26312092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008565398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014991869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6425044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873752839","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4502","title":"Politics and Policy Change in American Administrative Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Law; Political science; Arbitrariness; Abandonment (legal); Law and economics; Administrative law; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07245255672048595,"score_gpt":0.4187299525912302,"score_spread":0.34627739587074424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1873752839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7773841,0.000043013606,0.000005800414,0.0064202095,0.00022828844,0.00041023333,0.000019924524,0.00002840513,0.21546003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967645,0.00002219744,0.0001531536,0.0015844599,0.0012166979,0.000024354384,5.681338e-7,0.000010134683,0.00022393756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902624,0.00005532545,0.00019250003,0.00018114345,0.0002445075,0.00030030406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993172,0.00013683121,0.00011220975,0.000115948766,0.000111370544,0.00020638815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027633924,0.00008963712,0.00020725606,0.00013103892,0.00015603243,0.00012124124,0.00030610355,0.000067602006,0.00003820559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048200376,0.000089504814,0.000019738585,0.0005016175,0.0005537495,0.00043142136,0.000089294175,0.00016395457,0.000010234215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027324257,0.000094492854,0.022022428,0.00015191386,0.000011302904,0.000009913008,0.0362958,7.5374237e-7,0.00070027955,0.93571025,0.00016839153,0.0048071267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010684159,0.00071406725,0.5618572,0.0004031626,0.00017181618,0.0000056121567,0.027017614,0.00002884443,0.0036087038,0.014567516,0.3895301,0.0010269287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29951894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1261942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92114276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003061033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027893804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8897505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1874830625","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4410","title":"RACIALIZED IN JUSTICE: THE LEGAL AND EXTRA-LEGAL STRUGGLES OF MIGRANT AGRICULTURAL WORKERS IN CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Capitalism; Political science; Supreme court; Racism; Labour law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Freedom of association; Law; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.017230350071382093,"score_gpt":0.28464117954011126,"score_spread":0.2674108294687292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1874830625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885511,0.00015535449,0.000003042265,0.0029081977,0.0002617304,0.0005245978,0.000019593792,0.000005374972,0.0075710434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877363,0.00003858277,0.000100530015,0.0004039181,0.00009876115,0.00002732191,0.0000016103804,0.000006222333,0.00054941024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865115,0.00013004537,0.00034050667,0.00017062228,0.00039891934,0.00030874656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992859,0.00023315079,0.00012828587,0.00013211532,0.0001147418,0.000105847146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028108197,0.0001078768,0.00021910672,0.000079442405,0.00012363633,0.00011103808,0.0004644133,0.000050246086,0.00018895154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023248843,0.000073361945,0.000026077641,0.00049692084,0.00014578046,0.00048026998,0.00009628291,0.0001411333,8.510472e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000585239,0.00082527794,0.63770384,0.00086124876,0.00028610212,0.0000986458,0.09384531,0.0045884545,0.013242013,0.15336499,0.05900503,0.035593845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043306814,0.000017230594,0.95028657,0.00009986071,0.00007447714,2.8570895e-7,0.03871606,0.000034572062,0.00014814596,0.000053118343,0.010011033,0.00012559099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3125827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001334083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007505505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29916134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883554158","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4421","title":"LOOKING FOR QUALITY: THE EMPIRICAL DEBATE IN ACCESS TO JUSTICE RESEARCH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; CONTEST; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5530687811844535,"score_gpt":0.6007818828052836,"score_spread":0.04771310162083009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883554158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45960438,0.000048497204,0.0009991059,0.39928266,0.0013069997,0.003307822,0.000019654877,0.000059368125,0.13537148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97617614,0.000019162759,0.001124126,0.017083623,0.0008994228,0.00066735025,0.000004847396,0.000025843905,0.0039994963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970404,0.0006638727,0.00052682066,0.00034995758,0.0008348802,0.00058407494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245685,0.005346541,0.00016231588,0.00041035243,0.0013985841,0.00022535912],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005015777,0.00011681518,0.00021604658,0.0005243783,0.0007473363,0.001381671,0.0016878229,0.000119113916,0.0007830605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01687089,0.00009866351,0.000048732967,0.00282987,0.00020049144,0.0020969803,0.0003467244,0.0005197135,0.00026073807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039243666,0.0008349626,0.018222148,0.00064407673,0.00011008986,0.0000036764811,0.19318289,0.0013019387,0.0017181603,0.14277875,0.6069073,0.03390357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004091516,0.00008937766,0.16420251,0.00014890899,0.00019451018,5.084471e-7,0.04869923,0.0002707589,0.00039999466,0.0036768839,0.78155345,0.0003547083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01917818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060596196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51657176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019246271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010529443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W191593598","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4478","title":"Unity in Diversity: European Citizenship through the Lens of Popular Culture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; CONTEST; European union; Identity (music); Skepticism; Political science; Politics; Diversity (politics); European integration; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Political economy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Literature","score_opus":0.1528635642979528,"score_gpt":0.33139674642226635,"score_spread":0.17853318212431354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W191593598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24411766,0.000076931225,0.000051917246,0.0005430863,0.00013346077,0.00018997162,0.000023429564,0.000020692942,0.7548429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957801,0.000101052945,0.00018480845,0.0012889801,0.00014831751,8.1283713e-7,7.493082e-7,0.000010763908,0.002484396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985566,0.0005043648,0.00021798127,0.00016020145,0.000333646,0.0002272076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931157,0.000054992397,0.00018995456,0.00027486542,0.00011137419,0.00005724342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006900973,0.000091472815,0.00015202543,0.000046489728,0.00025909272,0.000022569475,0.0011525721,0.000044544064,0.000104115294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006154031,0.0000733659,0.000054657452,0.0004286228,0.00030174953,0.00029772852,0.00053708913,0.0001833904,0.000038307644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017879883,0.000192844,0.048937794,0.00016410039,0.000054649507,0.00004273453,0.40105298,0.000059228827,0.00026574556,0.53473645,0.013749493,0.0005651915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070638134,0.0001573448,0.85437024,0.00032290013,0.00021396604,0.0000010548097,0.019603021,0.0000020608388,0.0011719995,0.0063924505,0.116668426,0.00039016895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007919854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012553697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80543244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025799996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041830637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945724790","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4412","title":"‘ISLANDS OF EMPOWERMENT’: ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW AND THE QUESTION OF RACIAL EMANCIPATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Emancipation; Sociology; Politics; Privilege (computing); Political science; Power (physics); Ethnology; Status quo; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022123023957614105,"score_gpt":0.34684255039198875,"score_spread":0.32471952643437463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945724790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73421246,0.000077311204,0.0011476164,0.0014753229,0.00022286753,0.0005322309,0.00002216482,0.000012053473,0.26229796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908316,0.000027005284,0.0002374732,0.0002644278,0.00013155528,0.000012682324,0.0000039509255,0.000003330097,0.00023640276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916935,0.000121273115,0.00023178293,0.00008532329,0.00028686316,0.00010541345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991459,0.00021350266,0.00020634565,0.000091044334,0.0002980198,0.0000451701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039692197,0.00005406652,0.00015300818,0.00004924815,0.00012339593,0.000028324836,0.00016772887,0.000043370048,0.0000887677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028137537,0.000042533266,0.00003001978,0.00012300977,0.0010201131,0.00033136536,0.000046570192,0.000041742114,0.000003837599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035440167,0.00003099957,0.0018514005,0.00007147434,0.000010772611,9.861801e-8,0.004410301,0.000040856718,0.0005135692,0.99247503,0.00017209585,0.0003879548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006453626,0.0008398037,0.8235634,0.001255025,0.0022030482,0.0000044214,0.02995216,0.0010414511,0.021095246,0.03898089,0.073434725,0.0011762246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010508739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042079756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95349413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017814695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001665329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99608034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958945035","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4495","title":"Converging Feminist and Queer Legal Theories: Family Feuds and Family Ties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Family ties; Sociology; Gender studies; Queer theory; Family law; Criminology; Political science; Law; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.01907978739100149,"score_gpt":0.3096303091375563,"score_spread":0.2905505217465548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958945035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7891714,0.0004947896,0.000031345633,0.0014501999,0.00069212227,0.00022503131,0.000019118175,0.000057992253,0.20785798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991766,0.00023410043,0.00050138764,0.0020592974,0.0005399754,0.000011734743,0.0000011386538,0.000014161294,0.00487225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989101,0.00005789955,0.00017582794,0.00025091233,0.00033290914,0.0002723226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992451,0.00019953886,0.0000833976,0.00016229888,0.0001282912,0.00018134037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005270197,0.00013238737,0.000199835,0.000016152222,0.0005136337,0.00037476385,0.00037119686,0.00019340451,0.00008105636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024275658,0.00011821821,0.000040742205,0.00017367574,0.0009133122,0.00049218844,0.00017273569,0.0002811913,0.000010849757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013585859,0.000082373095,0.015573232,0.00039610887,0.00012545942,0.000015152022,0.16777028,0.000008032912,0.020767076,0.7684119,0.022688754,0.0040258104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006647865,0.000095955686,0.046706624,0.0001317318,0.00033102158,0.000004468401,0.13063057,0.000023815523,0.001113648,0.0050723986,0.81464595,0.0005790613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012996148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040242902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79195714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014545667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001271263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48207986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203119075","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4364","title":"OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF SELF-HELP LEGAL RESOURCES TO CITIZENS IN NEED","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Process (computing); Service provider; Public relations; Legal research; Business; Legal service; Knowledge management; Point (geometry); Service (business); Internet privacy; Political science; Marketing; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18574860047580985,"score_gpt":0.3929875146692892,"score_spread":0.20723891419347937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203119075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77447337,0.000060978884,0.0000118081625,0.049999107,0.00015469028,0.0004412887,0.000005415462,0.000012898242,0.17484044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966419,0.000049363498,0.00071963057,0.0015217033,0.00015625395,0.000034116943,0.0000015325447,0.000005528223,0.00087002176],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989868,0.00022088982,0.0002656723,0.00009008195,0.00025454475,0.00018200318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985524,0.0009690013,0.000112672045,0.0001267809,0.00015689465,0.00008224401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012927213,0.0000594734,0.00010540102,0.00032372557,0.000114450704,0.00013060393,0.0002848965,0.000046638997,0.000047091187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020818787,0.00005157323,0.000014152722,0.00081254967,0.00008065121,0.0010382714,0.000054606433,0.00014453192,0.0000068055147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009233592,0.0006286743,0.03525552,0.00017350762,0.000016215276,0.0000018039232,0.7344541,0.00008847274,0.000470501,0.20887366,0.01168612,0.008259104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018438464,0.00005742675,0.30155677,0.00006706865,0.000045065364,8.258967e-7,0.23161884,0.000011806704,0.00007462432,0.00019123749,0.46607843,0.00011352061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037307728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023958771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5028352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003116386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025892947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56398374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101070058","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4420","title":"MARGINALIZING TRANS MEDICAL EXPENSES: LINE-DRAWING EXERCISES IN TAX","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Business; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04237428838415885,"score_gpt":0.28195690279442526,"score_spread":0.2395826144102664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101070058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931476,0.00013729684,0.0024355762,0.00485739,0.00046994965,0.0007563,0.0000025496927,0.00012131064,0.0597436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99440646,0.000021049595,0.00038235856,0.0037001248,0.0007596985,0.00006663974,0.0000057969532,0.000030864016,0.0006270134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984081,0.000014557867,0.00046249607,0.0003021085,0.0004985848,0.00031417623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919146,0.000094496325,0.00024863455,0.00023181715,0.00018580766,0.00004780243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003099191,0.00018024168,0.00029160996,0.00040805715,0.000074468546,0.0003361681,0.00063446286,0.00008971654,0.003204716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045754286,0.00017454979,0.000059816048,0.0006780969,0.000054855172,0.0018864344,0.00020326444,0.00017895811,0.00052440853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014660272,0.0031138968,0.39470285,0.015847705,0.00023643713,0.00071895745,0.0065860683,0.013663809,0.072593525,0.052814566,0.18960364,0.24865253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008906577,0.00014887564,0.64338744,0.0074926675,0.0008434794,0.00001825437,0.0106320195,0.058676176,0.009859738,0.008634579,0.24744357,0.00395661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022321246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003846483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24868461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023814822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054021195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102478617","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4503","title":"The Elusive Search for Accountability: Evaluating Adjudicative Tribunals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Accountability; Statute; Political science; Statutory law; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Law; Empirical research; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21485697220580602,"score_gpt":0.5664119353968783,"score_spread":0.35155496319107227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102478617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468046,0.00009577633,0.0008910987,0.031945325,0.001561921,0.0046452037,0.000087380584,0.00006414461,0.013904579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98762584,0.000026333311,0.0031652208,0.004365084,0.0020779222,0.0011298495,0.000011320524,0.000043350246,0.0015551032],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965899,0.0006774344,0.0008374583,0.00042787596,0.0007720355,0.0006952735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97557366,0.021282377,0.0004124257,0.0008271373,0.0016046674,0.0002997369],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007967668,0.00017493607,0.00038903035,0.0000879924,0.0011029436,0.000058403035,0.0010934733,0.00024175864,0.0013715995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029780446,0.00012053447,0.000100168814,0.00035067662,0.0002918557,0.00038890645,0.0004938052,0.0012352094,0.0002887217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015011158,0.0024231733,0.16823766,0.017226093,0.0011787561,0.0000073812103,0.13986523,0.00032865582,0.11774232,0.10896638,0.2113984,0.2176148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044111977,0.001483645,0.21033289,0.000976999,0.0014746676,0.0000021418612,0.06828325,0.00207355,0.012791447,0.0076510455,0.68963474,0.0008844495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047731178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030861984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47823632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068553716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089808647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145310377","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4484","title":"It’s Not Working: Barriers to the Inclusion of Workers with Mental Health Issues","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Mental health; Harassment; Workforce; Work (physics); Isolation (microbiology); Psychology; Criminology; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.12094392633594984,"score_gpt":0.39363271885302253,"score_spread":0.2726887925170727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145310377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21869838,0.00007194498,0.0005311816,0.25839257,0.0010001599,0.0019006273,0.00003282141,0.00009363243,0.5192787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98850876,0.000020509311,0.0009909131,0.0084416475,0.000110495246,0.000011497093,0.0000014037067,0.000011481135,0.001903266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984483,0.00017774533,0.0002646637,0.00018337078,0.0006633387,0.00026257423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991199,0.00006183943,0.00016592315,0.00022227074,0.00010912737,0.00032094482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010816304,0.00009449399,0.00017832122,0.00009517213,0.000605247,0.000049814473,0.00078886707,0.00004405561,0.0005126553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023119737,0.000069470385,0.000037860693,0.00041523273,0.00021819645,0.00021887645,0.00042809965,0.0000774565,0.000023436303],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006836561,0.00013602531,0.0090984665,0.00011559105,0.000050068218,0.0000014501765,0.89749634,0.00007103192,0.000078713005,0.035297487,0.04945866,0.0075124865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081103836,0.00073335797,0.052085876,0.0009813514,0.0001722258,4.9951484e-7,0.18024784,0.000019514928,0.0043264097,0.0005963148,0.7595018,0.0005237631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00788609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070824157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7698104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006682169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028114638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155701897","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4358","title":"THINKING PAST RIGHTS: TOWARDS FEMINIST THEORIES OF REPARATIONS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Blueprint; Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Human rights; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Law","score_opus":0.05204544252650565,"score_gpt":0.2918164277951084,"score_spread":0.23977098526860277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155701897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033800162,0.00018314624,0.0005660496,0.0005256235,0.00094783143,0.00019580826,0.00012704554,0.0000565403,0.9635978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896663,0.0000017208071,0.00026215642,0.0004980154,0.0011541612,0.000013662573,0.000008854145,0.000012866963,0.008382298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989197,0.00003831025,0.00037406405,0.00012928048,0.00028838782,0.0002502537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920046,0.00013715081,0.00013058078,0.00024166782,0.00014644944,0.00014367141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019775893,0.00012327496,0.00024698715,0.0000870762,0.00021918332,0.000086943386,0.00040681747,0.000045710985,0.00076152425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008003791,0.00009753632,0.000082722225,0.000065052904,0.00027709376,0.00048148152,0.00012663004,0.00009939555,0.000061671235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033712357,0.00012739861,0.00048443422,0.00011237458,0.000027024978,7.717362e-7,0.018784223,0.0000058688215,0.00002292878,0.9769446,0.0032851954,0.00017143715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002347259,0.00019482423,0.0017879121,0.00013726557,0.00031262464,0.0000017270818,0.0029630335,0.000054315693,0.0005057943,0.0368943,0.9565744,0.0003391142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005012565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078431454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030884254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039589508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83381563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165304286","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4418","title":"SHIFTING JUDICIAL CONCEPTIONS OF 'RECONCILIATION': GEOGRAPHIC COMMITMENTS UNDERPINNING ABORIGINAL RIGHTS DECISIONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Underpinning; Power (physics); Identity (music); Sociology; Colonialism; Law; Political science; Politics; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04326715924850702,"score_gpt":0.3733716521872018,"score_spread":0.3301044929386948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165304286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88095367,0.000081921826,0.00069439056,0.00043941222,0.0009378043,0.000976711,0.000019383207,0.000045419096,0.11585128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957092,0.00030979878,0.002076532,0.00013562353,0.0006852201,0.000017294422,0.000011069426,0.000013709128,0.0010415887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979047,0.00020633065,0.00057573593,0.0002591556,0.0005991149,0.00045492436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772596,0.00060280174,0.0003746866,0.00026015812,0.0007750477,0.0002613151],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006411111,0.00013831955,0.0002780933,0.00034837797,0.0030056818,0.000108942986,0.00062229857,0.00014149827,0.0008576444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057842608,0.00012718631,0.00008332436,0.0006917329,0.00035584474,0.0007283445,0.0000074427066,0.0001690119,0.00013777985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062255676,0.0008442333,0.05225087,0.00021939843,0.00018113882,0.0000025949084,0.42232284,0.00046152482,0.00012569048,0.518863,0.0024606779,0.0022057316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015104878,0.00038818078,0.42501402,0.0010050193,0.0006689966,0.0000021111784,0.022666346,0.00017256994,0.00091098144,0.028952941,0.5177258,0.0009825076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19064754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19788364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51526517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001339908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036447614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192283895","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4491","title":"HLA Hart, Lon Fuller and the Ghosts of Legal Interpretation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Human leukocyte antigen; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Linguistics; Immunology","score_opus":0.014425546957771136,"score_gpt":0.3172044303791481,"score_spread":0.30277888342137693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192283895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81806064,0.00018263666,0.0001320423,0.007163254,0.0008435265,0.0004959716,0.000010208389,0.000029533529,0.17308219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633366,0.000054542663,0.00035722167,0.0006406696,0.00028172418,0.000009815483,9.1139896e-7,0.0000058688174,0.0023155897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992174,0.000080364036,0.00016452598,0.00012463181,0.00028105936,0.00013200594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993324,0.00020166929,0.00011461528,0.00014384398,0.00014485257,0.00006259267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057250407,0.00006627283,0.00013867281,0.0000098506125,0.00017462832,0.000095341755,0.00039067763,0.00010162813,0.00019348974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039706295,0.0000461105,0.000056188444,0.00014974698,0.00060590863,0.00035465567,0.000094036935,0.00018211533,0.000010324625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011091693,0.00022725499,0.0039509097,0.0004928513,0.000194761,0.0000041411354,0.35253826,0.000107970634,0.014738309,0.5669225,0.04312548,0.016588371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00570729,0.00032968874,0.06716767,0.0006033913,0.0016460523,0.000008791451,0.08876448,0.0010778737,0.0206716,0.012330254,0.8005418,0.0011510911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007142708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091034826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7574163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007973175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062059225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22324955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195285776","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4711","title":"ARCHITECTURE, RITUALS, AND NORMS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; McGill University","keywords":"Adjudication; Economic Justice; Legitimacy; Dignity; Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Realisation; Civil law (Civil law); Value (mathematics); Public law; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.06755592402990689,"score_gpt":0.36041342655953085,"score_spread":0.29285750252962395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195285776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7550821,0.00027527858,0.00037589736,0.008567625,0.00012121266,0.00077280606,0.000017627997,0.000058137044,0.23472933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977111,0.00002090622,0.0005957795,0.0004658917,0.00020822039,0.000031305637,0.0000011923006,0.000008437877,0.00095716736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991694,0.00003502483,0.00015717297,0.00018129547,0.00025715915,0.00019991548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945325,0.000069568916,0.000055063694,0.0001357869,0.00008471949,0.00020160874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003703197,0.00007084316,0.00012601279,0.000090997426,0.00008014172,0.00008416693,0.00035401352,0.000060537233,0.000029221563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003507571,0.00006452892,0.00001630941,0.000339449,0.00011430107,0.0002144849,0.00014298802,0.00011491924,0.00002320082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058910914,0.0015446423,0.18906151,0.0016142715,0.000110971545,0.000042726777,0.29139814,0.008101962,0.0023686215,0.40645915,0.05400021,0.044708673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017948202,0.00019743956,0.20932448,0.00030138396,0.00015957111,0.0000047395806,0.015409028,0.00022954697,0.00090412836,0.021318845,0.7495633,0.000792743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025312584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008015531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6955631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035396446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002163009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44728547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203974182","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4546","title":"Reflective Equilibrium: Epistemological or Political?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Work (physics); Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Law; Neoclassical economics; Physics","score_opus":0.18923729405500175,"score_gpt":0.43077700877945313,"score_spread":0.24153971472445138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203974182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19758151,0.000039445662,0.000274301,0.008139271,0.00034379654,0.000382732,0.000020020321,0.00010767593,0.79311126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931915,0.00000932317,0.00081026717,0.002386854,0.0009522653,0.000016347914,0.0000011906401,0.000014114871,0.0026181776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980772,0.00032707304,0.00028805083,0.00030464548,0.00044230596,0.00056071806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978918,0.0011528234,0.000053103777,0.00024518603,0.00019888714,0.0004582111],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048337562,0.00013150877,0.00028764643,0.00009521739,0.00030426276,0.000048120604,0.0006777591,0.00015334316,0.0013388728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002471986,0.00010895873,0.00009180729,0.0004686787,0.0008957846,0.00033465342,0.00019671986,0.00019141054,0.00022601955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005019684,0.00017019719,0.0006538858,0.00006585575,0.000019784986,0.00010148883,0.0021897336,0.000008636791,0.00042034185,0.9942412,0.0014253189,0.00020162915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002021304,0.002277191,0.02053604,0.0004211682,0.0006602282,0.000108388485,0.0066570058,0.00004532177,0.012455949,0.77292067,0.18002556,0.0018711973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024984393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018520295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79560995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080864775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019498507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210147736","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4539","title":"Dishing up Israel: Rethinking the Potential of Legal Mixité","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Judgement; Dialogic; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legal history; Sociology; Israeli law; Common law; Religious law; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law; Geography","score_opus":0.05974086345521199,"score_gpt":0.32363465804989083,"score_spread":0.2638937945946788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210147736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8403584,0.0005878926,0.0006465998,0.006358121,0.0013219897,0.0003495667,0.000015123276,0.00004969242,0.15031266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978723,0.00012188791,0.00015965366,0.0005176579,0.00069972966,0.000006728893,7.317276e-7,0.0000062499853,0.0006150863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986236,0.00008966465,0.0002538192,0.00015891096,0.0006422316,0.0002317484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924946,0.00018837121,0.00014256692,0.00013586767,0.00021908715,0.000064634376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044278824,0.00008747326,0.0001870083,0.000053884487,0.0008948227,0.000053016774,0.00065639906,0.000059073056,0.00005959782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005418422,0.00006824193,0.0000875595,0.00031711307,0.0008305577,0.0003909162,0.00022758976,0.00014267596,0.00001642195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003769876,0.00023705476,0.023515927,0.00014741509,0.00029834808,0.00007241526,0.06006269,0.001293476,0.003648993,0.8903188,0.014035878,0.005992032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020455874,0.00038985073,0.6445803,0.001076831,0.0018262762,0.00003973268,0.07438606,0.00020045243,0.007836214,0.050625477,0.21534958,0.0016436387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01885625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013262624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8396933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031504253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024356092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210386310","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4680","title":"IMMIGRATION AND DISABILITY IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Legalization; Citizenship; Immigration law; Political science; Naturalization; Immigration reform; Discretion; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.037078437423837554,"score_gpt":0.3167013106575316,"score_spread":0.27962287323369406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210386310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98925954,0.00004182944,0.000014464323,0.00886846,0.000048819038,0.00016137055,0.0000058306596,0.0000046682685,0.0015950076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991472,0.000051431707,0.000024813091,0.00066822954,0.00006718361,0.0000033757378,0.000006272278,0.0000019618567,0.00002958077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944115,0.000099708,0.00009129316,0.00008670779,0.00019367912,0.00008744294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964094,0.0001447748,0.000030273572,0.00006937108,0.000050747447,0.000063908585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004497383,0.000038524362,0.00005832327,0.000024071249,0.000074154486,0.00006282682,0.00011675052,0.000021392245,0.0000057646907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020915357,0.00002971366,0.0000044251237,0.00017393529,0.00010226747,0.00017212995,0.00003218979,0.000046014145,3.400503e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014908222,0.00014566834,0.8621367,0.0001576173,0.000015001,0.000006859007,0.10355337,0.00093234295,0.00004905483,0.009868711,0.01401492,0.008970663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026823007,0.000043283904,0.9082465,0.00003053973,0.000042419302,5.0798644e-7,0.052404433,0.00025327678,0.000038377835,0.000854497,0.037707187,0.000110702014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9196214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94563305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051148936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004722373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011300247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121168785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219473791","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4493","title":"Human Rights Disclosure Litigation: Uncovering Invisible Medical Records","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Confidentiality; Neglect; Relevance (law); Jurisprudence; Internet privacy; Business; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Medical record; Personally identifiable information; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Computer security; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.04647661731335942,"score_gpt":0.3538727867256669,"score_spread":0.3073961694123075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219473791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93845695,0.000017408223,0.00010919834,0.0015010599,0.0006020472,0.0003123235,0.0000113040005,0.00006155439,0.058928173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958947,0.0000023363946,0.0009455194,0.00088446663,0.0009498515,0.000014318511,0.0000224918,0.000020557602,0.0012657635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841607,0.000032788357,0.00037106592,0.0002677883,0.00066564156,0.0002466617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875015,0.00010995509,0.00011307333,0.0004615219,0.00015966914,0.00040564558],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031811744,0.00014920079,0.00029481278,0.00016550577,0.00014814973,0.000047384252,0.0004357535,0.00019600704,0.0020628949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052954006,0.00013038659,0.000078305435,0.00028443948,0.00010471857,0.00035568344,0.0002180065,0.0005102619,0.000113289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020075177,0.004235134,0.65958714,0.009062577,0.00099298,0.0009200118,0.008593486,0.00020428866,0.14556731,0.04010283,0.105020285,0.02370645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049413005,0.0014483547,0.7036047,0.002228478,0.0011337593,0.00009446929,0.00016307416,0.00022500947,0.0840223,0.008164711,0.19302092,0.0009529093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002876271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031819416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08800064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022721406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013753635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220704094","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4373","title":"INCOMMENSURABLE LEGAL CULTURES: INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS AND THE COLONIAL NARRATIVE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mythology; Ethnology; Narrative; Humanities; Sociology; History; Anthropology; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Literature; Ecology","score_opus":0.027444553619193755,"score_gpt":0.3330571556791615,"score_spread":0.30561260205996776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220704094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7511681,0.0012084706,0.000038870163,0.025663445,0.0010870377,0.0013050116,0.00008667025,0.00008544522,0.21935698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925997,0.00014485553,0.0002391116,0.002574904,0.0012122894,0.000061461455,0.0000054335687,0.000010543995,0.0031516866],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863654,0.00025811727,0.00019123252,0.0001491099,0.00037743078,0.00038755854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915516,0.00026929413,0.00011323388,0.00014217342,0.00013168009,0.000188463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074704696,0.00012146314,0.00020888048,0.000012594875,0.0014534979,0.000253345,0.0004698776,0.00014293953,0.00016591708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019520815,0.000083898914,0.00007885375,0.00030018354,0.0007926511,0.0010032606,0.0000709463,0.00025970582,0.000019829546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014785629,0.00015698916,0.0006013672,0.0000441041,0.00008773169,0.0000020469608,0.7626399,0.000023731915,0.00011291994,0.18675016,0.049249128,0.0001841092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014768506,0.000093239796,0.00893781,0.0000647031,0.00041521253,0.000009263803,0.15176202,0.0000059194604,0.00032532174,0.0018411613,0.8347181,0.00035036544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025667304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010910744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.785469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006510138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014706347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229024471","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4409","title":"THE WOMAN WHO FELL FROM THE SKY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Diversity and Impact of Dance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fell; Sky; Reflection (computer programming); Art; Geology; Meteorology; Computer science; Physics; Paleontology","score_opus":0.03896990331932001,"score_gpt":0.3130088029355826,"score_spread":0.2740388996162626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229024471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7632933,0.0004895222,0.00011326611,0.009925378,0.0011301014,0.00055568456,0.000046357633,0.000044142784,0.2244022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742869,0.000034113116,0.00011653453,0.006990546,0.00060723216,0.000029815126,0.0000035676674,0.000021964275,0.017909288],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989035,0.00009598382,0.00019262686,0.00022350959,0.00025161644,0.00033272876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982834,0.00068433356,0.0001224914,0.0006984834,0.00009723717,0.00011408899],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018715595,0.00012932536,0.00015733538,0.000031403008,0.0002509131,0.00024756964,0.0015808312,0.00007613969,0.003184811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016559896,0.000080000544,0.00006782809,0.0001686766,0.00016355947,0.00035192902,0.00031264496,0.00020167578,0.003850285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017894906,0.00013024468,0.013482518,0.000020474914,0.00019925833,0.0000062403133,0.005689981,0.000024682688,0.0004249762,0.00410589,0.96150124,0.014235526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045023288,0.000111330955,0.8143502,0.0000536542,0.00016194773,0.0000013114319,0.003151913,0.000021672664,0.00040031492,0.00070072507,0.18042123,0.00017548002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030341824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8008677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018204057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002548086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99772644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245236174","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4505","title":"Implications of the Internet for Quasi-Legislative Instruments of Regulation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Pace; The Internet; Legislature; Openness to experience; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Point (geometry); Public relations; Law; Psychology; History; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.046258174562250176,"score_gpt":0.30275521261169713,"score_spread":0.25649703804944696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245236174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9231409,0.000009407615,0.004161866,0.0027840685,0.0006424502,0.0009381254,0.000018011497,0.000021427557,0.06828377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982594,6.045955e-7,0.00063282705,0.00022608,0.00021178769,0.000034915698,0.000004516922,0.000009549076,0.0006202783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933517,0.000004464525,0.00029316923,0.0001262312,0.00014963163,0.00009132108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883986,0.000049919712,0.0004320904,0.00026121704,0.00041045796,0.000006432195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012453336,0.000078073135,0.0001554273,0.000106675696,0.000056071905,0.00003367072,0.00041598937,0.000034391065,0.000085609994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018500355,0.000061010305,0.00006838398,0.0002952544,0.000094573756,0.00044023042,0.00021243181,0.000051449937,0.000006088623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003655191,0.0004837263,0.316404,0.0018025975,0.0002257539,4.3773365e-8,0.0013490439,0.00063817814,0.062410254,0.5573523,0.021083647,0.037884917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036230925,0.000016933742,0.9725066,0.00009308331,0.00013899892,1.1655143e-7,0.00014183288,0.0014239872,0.005106666,0.006677649,0.013441871,0.000089963156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111825386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010856152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6561026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066043776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017630857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24879281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257497325","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4519","title":"SHIFTING GROUND, SOLID FOUNDATIONS: IMAGINING A NEW PARADIGM FOR CANADIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ENGAGEMENT","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil society; Public administration; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Politics; Government (linguistics); Accountability; Democracy; Dissenting opinion; Public relations; Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.18896545694486405,"score_gpt":0.405369293527524,"score_spread":0.21640383658265994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257497325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17241415,0.0009748474,0.042523712,0.08748325,0.0042171953,0.005178265,0.00006479482,0.00073000154,0.68641376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833176,0.000029917921,0.009835377,0.0035616544,0.00094918447,0.00008885504,0.00002539636,0.000036774727,0.002155211],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814814,0.00029078007,0.00029946546,0.0002506176,0.00045648817,0.00055452157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809915,0.0005188513,0.000154827,0.00033856873,0.0002521055,0.0006364998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027937444,0.00014742516,0.00020940848,0.00014229974,0.0012423496,0.00048548775,0.00100057,0.000081451595,0.00017188795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009085855,0.00017194146,0.000101789,0.00043670737,0.00008190813,0.00058128766,0.00020515648,0.00030734786,0.000057897512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001179078,0.00023040202,0.004164663,0.00041663938,0.00039688387,0.0000058164874,0.7871057,0.0077601424,0.00008587562,0.05015897,0.117094174,0.03246286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008662857,0.00011382992,0.0020086293,0.0001666427,0.00028078043,4.2856672e-7,0.13782343,0.0010406815,0.000038121198,0.0025862001,0.85469955,0.00037542675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37679067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8109035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042614632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017284764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9555274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260104550","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4515","title":"FROM ENFORCEMENT TO INTEGRATION: INFUSING ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION-MAKING WITH HUMAN RIGHTS VALUES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Human rights; Business; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.0703517731430841,"score_gpt":0.3463030135256195,"score_spread":0.2759512403825354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260104550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49101502,0.000010122645,0.013753866,0.0007141986,0.0005446994,0.000647543,0.000011178594,0.00008656722,0.4932168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984726,7.8706634e-8,0.0059295837,0.007606381,0.0013746495,0.00002758164,0.00003826547,0.000018662538,0.0002787868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841887,0.000011658542,0.00038175876,0.00029257438,0.000720264,0.00017488412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850726,0.000069045804,0.00023256778,0.00021147015,0.0009177864,0.00006183975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002442571,0.00018815455,0.00020335724,0.0002887494,0.00015665329,0.0005698548,0.00044489236,0.00004394847,0.0005107444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020198534,0.00015104425,0.000035496698,0.00036729357,0.000045382414,0.0017376699,0.00020800286,0.00009102614,0.00026723833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021262,0.0005156726,0.0019615178,0.00010790813,0.00024844985,0.00006279916,0.005047094,0.00941348,0.0018653953,0.88318956,0.0929968,0.0024651217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007958416,0.0017262121,0.018976292,0.006478692,0.0017211941,0.000009530475,0.01225336,0.023509497,0.025745424,0.311242,0.5869553,0.0034240219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012486241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006490123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5719475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009747083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007300181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6159406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260238739","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4378","title":"THE CROWN’S FIDUCIARY DUTIES TO ABORIGINAL PEOPLES AS AN ASPECT OF CLIMATE JUSTICE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Fiduciary; Climate justice; Justiciability; Redress; Law; Political science; Threatened species; Environmental ethics; Duty; Subsistence agriculture; Arctic; Common law; Indigenous; Climate change; Sociology; Geography; Human rights; Archaeology; Ecology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.026924269353843944,"score_gpt":0.377159018626133,"score_spread":0.35023474927228904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260238739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7663607,0.0003082004,0.000013375913,0.0014920536,0.00063916657,0.00036143113,0.00004668005,0.000034824418,0.23074359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472314,0.0006516274,0.00046952855,0.0009281714,0.0012942703,0.000022751232,0.0000026843989,0.000021681712,0.0018861296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813884,0.00018995487,0.0003068271,0.00020065215,0.00054271414,0.0006210275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853086,0.0005247865,0.00015680613,0.00036091582,0.00006338729,0.0003632621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092147087,0.00015106401,0.00021698054,0.000082239945,0.0006003741,0.000115867304,0.00089376746,0.00008426698,0.00047690156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036132446,0.00012447977,0.00006704907,0.0002753218,0.00032521994,0.0007384424,0.00017874138,0.00012058629,0.00025038765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007957802,0.00065203634,0.04679359,0.00068582036,0.00008675171,0.0000061845844,0.09785083,0.00028554513,0.0028700335,0.83496666,0.008314171,0.0066926116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040868737,0.00048647184,0.38403162,0.00020198313,0.0009709977,0.000004270622,0.039046317,0.0000067356664,0.009327178,0.0008447262,0.56401473,0.0006562468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055606295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00285864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83412194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007625885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001834651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8406046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265698276","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4411","title":"WE ARE ALL HERE TO STAY? INDIGENEITY, MIGRATION, AND ‘DECOLONIZING’ THE TREATY RIGHT TO BE HERE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Indigenous; Treaty; Colonialism; Decolonization; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; History; Politics; Ecology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.039979801221548504,"score_gpt":0.3347082536826407,"score_spread":0.2947284524610922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265698276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9371131,0.0002194527,0.000029187011,0.030800857,0.0004780424,0.0021214935,0.000026334856,0.000046987745,0.029164523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97304827,0.0010848043,0.00089703716,0.0040557734,0.0011633009,0.00008176149,0.000007642801,0.000036648373,0.01962474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980113,0.00021989038,0.00034529096,0.0003764858,0.00047880746,0.0005682607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982485,0.0002633428,0.00017222995,0.00037014438,0.0004399754,0.0005057728],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005648672,0.00018432418,0.00025186065,0.00016089265,0.0024359701,0.00036739503,0.00076284737,0.00015383112,0.00049235485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055815966,0.00013044746,0.000045277164,0.0004968267,0.00012982755,0.0004935589,0.000026310523,0.00014764837,0.00026249525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005304179,0.0002797252,0.024359468,0.00025050476,0.00007000002,0.000004342237,0.9418648,0.00007643771,0.000052434458,0.007819866,0.023987062,0.0011823352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001712482,0.0001660338,0.06878014,0.00009746683,0.00011526298,0.0000013646068,0.041691422,0.000004861564,0.0007034911,0.00057929056,0.8873858,0.0003036229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15577942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8204174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90017337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017632522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001929238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272975401","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4568","title":"Cardboard Boxes and Invisible Fences: Homelessness and Public Space in City of Victoria v. Adams","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Victory; Normative; Sociology; Autonomy; Public space; Economic Justice; Poverty; Law; Meaning (existential); Space (punctuation); Political science; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Politics; History; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.041755369473819644,"score_gpt":0.3374319252273366,"score_spread":0.295676555753517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272975401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659879,0.0011333956,0.00004451346,0.0016057113,0.00024399176,0.00034437765,0.000012177239,0.00003192107,0.030595966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985236,0.00015936882,0.0007973884,0.0001237389,0.00019449566,0.000006825699,7.190877e-7,0.000009118767,0.00018476803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834406,0.00013704754,0.00031381263,0.00032067744,0.0005162012,0.0003681967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989474,0.00023933398,0.00016633914,0.00023522401,0.00018371677,0.00022798525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006410831,0.00014144728,0.00040474435,0.00023988161,0.00011524129,0.00018258384,0.00056266115,0.00013940014,0.00004724589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083287887,0.00014073565,0.000030410205,0.0008201886,0.00038689972,0.0007967036,0.00018895374,0.00015542649,0.0000028457932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022131945,0.0003315279,0.69358236,0.00055477873,0.000051027902,0.000022611492,0.25212523,0.00006330169,0.0013223548,0.042364974,0.00063636946,0.008724169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018390744,0.0005557665,0.86933064,0.0006412317,0.00027712376,0.0000012610817,0.05002697,0.000077638535,0.0031936963,0.0068733576,0.066155195,0.0010280482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004451122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026439177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20209825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005373982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016584808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6728795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272998328","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4482","title":"Of Minors and the Mentally Ill: Re-positioning Perspectives on Consent to Health Care","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mentally ill; Health care; Medicine; Psychiatry; Psychology; Political science; Mental health; Law; Mental illness","score_opus":0.08557305990820874,"score_gpt":0.39822079707736324,"score_spread":0.3126477371691545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272998328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88290983,0.0051692645,0.0001165526,0.031432718,0.0003089449,0.0019693715,0.000051309682,0.000034996323,0.07800698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99144834,0.00023260436,0.0022560414,0.0056882133,0.00016534967,0.000017808998,0.0000028212687,0.0000164011,0.00017244612],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988289,0.00010273685,0.0003253351,0.0002366909,0.00032063856,0.00018571869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986866,0.00029851968,0.0001410535,0.0002842876,0.0003740581,0.00021546503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042567463,0.000110908375,0.00032547567,0.00013437767,0.00009714726,0.000014738256,0.00016846362,0.000064784865,0.00007099874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005005569,0.00008100866,0.000048823385,0.00017314844,0.0001774862,0.00004922719,0.00011087383,0.00024036136,0.0000053072545],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005169743,0.0003900544,0.010308354,0.0057327393,0.00021002072,0.000037644822,0.9197474,0.0000388673,0.00027575577,0.04818699,0.0044726813,0.0054297633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009231853,0.010914294,0.21793398,0.0045764334,0.0016900216,0.000049443028,0.7330185,0.00006081274,0.010614342,0.0004465641,0.01061759,0.00084614597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002646477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014779418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20762563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081303886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002598492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40006992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273188823","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4550","title":"Legislation’s Influence on Judiciarization: Examining the Effects of Statutory Structure and Language on Rates of Court Use in Child Welfare Contexts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Welfare; Statutory law; Legislature; Political science; Context (archaeology); Referral; Law; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Medicine; Geography; Nursing","score_opus":0.0235774031170085,"score_gpt":0.3124123180377488,"score_spread":0.2888349149207403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273188823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981388,0.00014440343,0.0000309317,0.00018576703,0.0000960398,0.00023848799,0.000012738905,0.000007641199,0.0011452035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995368,0.000094720184,0.000033620756,0.00020280242,0.00006205889,0.0000056949402,0.0000023909583,0.0000066899433,0.00005521756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905246,0.00012580618,0.00022556278,0.0001546213,0.00032255083,0.0001189677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987189,0.00072518043,0.00018944775,0.00016829142,0.00015741005,0.000040739706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001610594,0.00008594962,0.00019438934,0.00019605762,0.00023892478,0.000029344088,0.0002040403,0.00005839702,0.000024929703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011578888,0.000070839145,0.000025494783,0.00046047813,0.00020086438,0.0002765618,0.000039626684,0.00012754933,7.72365e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010329348,0.00065869506,0.38381332,0.0015870379,0.00029448987,0.00010539988,0.5037528,0.053862665,0.008874751,0.013967531,0.00049591763,0.03155443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039607464,0.0002746748,0.9461851,0.0005597153,0.00033077865,0.0000015945812,0.046945754,0.0001091654,0.004718127,0.000011929988,0.00032092037,0.00014612918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075292983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004621193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5623718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028354727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005527826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275482756","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4417","title":"THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: LESSONS FROM LAWYER-LICENSING REFORM","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Law; Legal profession; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07006859944101311,"score_gpt":0.39852298376303613,"score_spread":0.328454384322023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275482756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47963616,0.00016067293,0.00013395073,0.3534934,0.0015966215,0.0009817382,0.00008523168,0.0000426417,0.16386957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838734,0.00009212897,0.0014618922,0.012290318,0.00046593545,0.000032889016,0.0000052313176,0.000017088518,0.0017610703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984625,0.000094002295,0.00036561937,0.0002378292,0.00051952776,0.00032049458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975972,0.00090236077,0.00024848682,0.00032614364,0.00070341607,0.0002223733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049888436,0.000121898855,0.00018534262,0.00003635097,0.00086091313,0.00071457936,0.00078070624,0.00008682104,0.00035175856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007123408,0.00009968966,0.000040231185,0.0005935842,0.0002399173,0.0015748289,0.00025475622,0.00025399533,0.000021112019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013161487,0.0002777994,0.0072133928,0.0004635577,0.00033621193,0.0000018600011,0.075057216,0.00022353246,0.004185938,0.2720347,0.61722875,0.022845445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028182074,0.000031756805,0.0961797,0.00014401966,0.00039674228,6.583698e-7,0.059051983,0.00009983468,0.002054878,0.0010824668,0.840311,0.00036512432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94341016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74902856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5042373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021344707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013770883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6890705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278437627","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4531","title":"Unfinished Business: Canada’s Contribution to Promoting Compliance with International Humanitarian Law Through the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict Agenda of the United Nations Security Council","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Compliance (psychology); International humanitarian law; Armed conflict; Security council; International law; Law; Public administration; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.09066970407550064,"score_gpt":0.3214931555907834,"score_spread":0.23082345151528277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278437627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8686333,0.000011255628,0.0005260269,0.017130045,0.00047251405,0.0020186494,0.0001434867,0.000021261296,0.11104349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865985,0.0000019876936,0.000062389256,0.00079071353,0.000111028865,0.000023318391,0.000008813334,0.0000051424736,0.00033676627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983252,0.000115773626,0.00032733334,0.00015459872,0.00091651804,0.00016056416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724215,0.00011922483,0.00028951175,0.00015586491,0.0021629697,0.000030256335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047310715,0.000090249196,0.00015256924,0.000114401155,0.0003537291,0.000053537653,0.00067055854,0.0000448966,0.00005229804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005851832,0.00006297954,0.000026218542,0.00075723196,0.00020278216,0.0002553508,0.000045040935,0.00013292115,8.7662437e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012903954,0.00012360928,0.00019349578,0.000047929123,0.000031843992,0.0000015388226,0.014493597,0.0017721744,0.00050969276,0.9824419,0.0002389763,0.00001622708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036394608,0.00054874696,0.4828513,0.0035551877,0.00038656112,0.0000069923362,0.005556064,0.0014859269,0.016633492,0.03309989,0.4513537,0.0008826609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5523728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91789913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.949342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039671693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011389098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.450608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278469572","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4416","title":"INSTITUTIONAL INEQUALITY AND THE DYNAMICS OF COURAGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Status quo; Courage; Political science; Solidarity; Power (physics); Sociology; Inequality; Welfare economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04119052759485642,"score_gpt":0.34313834799685616,"score_spread":0.30194782040199974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278469572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8767941,0.00005714041,0.003444637,0.015507974,0.00009093595,0.00069257885,0.000039196715,0.000017720064,0.10335572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987524,0.000026742793,0.00034283183,0.00029977722,0.000086088716,0.0000294178,0.0000019518031,0.0000028261115,0.00045796335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993578,0.000058354213,0.00017604136,0.00009023279,0.0002182577,0.000099294615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933267,0.00021961518,0.00009481396,0.0001393896,0.00015291589,0.000060576003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000424455,0.000043841,0.00010669219,0.000025699064,0.00019173902,0.00006120095,0.00034654868,0.000035450408,0.0001450263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024917768,0.000031722047,0.00002540546,0.00015946987,0.00054679613,0.00024414386,0.00013497523,0.00006491122,0.00001678939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144638,0.000029503299,0.0022255136,0.000041634295,0.00000926592,9.279037e-8,0.0019867923,0.00010556434,0.00005963466,0.9935614,0.00036503733,0.0016010868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003433575,0.000099466175,0.81920975,0.00021997937,0.0005330363,0.000002260392,0.017144397,0.018213004,0.0007193563,0.06075997,0.07897174,0.000693433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009222939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072001456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024884448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010516797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279423935","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4540","title":"Quiet Contributions: Re-Examining the Benefits of a Restorative Approach to Sentencing in the Aboriginal Context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Statutory law; Sentencing guidelines; Punishment (psychology); Economic Justice; Criminal law; Theory of criminal justice; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sentence; Geography","score_opus":0.07348146613082397,"score_gpt":0.36897695296857314,"score_spread":0.2954954868377492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279423935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91395295,0.00032496007,0.00024313376,0.0012339645,0.00028312308,0.0013000572,0.000027618387,0.000013949184,0.08262022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997664,0.00043725676,0.00035595396,0.00044367596,0.00051667215,0.000025580981,0.0000039105516,0.000007977601,0.00054499327],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980496,0.00046266752,0.00037888144,0.0002111597,0.0005315956,0.00036606324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982534,0.00065834256,0.00021141126,0.00027470294,0.0005054959,0.00009666491],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018154628,0.000106274194,0.00022112727,0.00014334884,0.0019549744,0.00004521328,0.0007897139,0.00008076568,0.000016773514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014793836,0.000066925524,0.00003556753,0.00082681107,0.00029183275,0.00027845107,0.000006628968,0.00019700106,0.000013494367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066208566,0.00017322642,0.0022232838,0.000050372164,0.000013090981,0.0000013688258,0.9042884,0.00047598244,0.000009866493,0.09175041,0.000837899,0.00010985969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008365676,0.00041558113,0.15712577,0.00047034232,0.00018205942,0.000010351606,0.5882974,0.00006807302,0.0007576653,0.00029702345,0.25110957,0.00042958648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10334335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20994176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31599104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015200501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004031529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279874743","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4413","title":"A REFLECTION ON BEING BORN BAD AND LAW’S OTHER VIOLENCES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Humanities; Political science; Art; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.04075795924783338,"score_gpt":0.3555728734242023,"score_spread":0.3148149141763689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279874743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83823067,0.000058161386,0.0002890767,0.0007840126,0.00026114524,0.00023964557,0.0000018958362,0.000047047117,0.16008833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691284,0.000080679034,0.00026008932,0.0011985307,0.00036342672,0.000033497094,4.400074e-7,0.000010415915,0.0011400672],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990109,0.000079431906,0.00017518378,0.00022902661,0.00029330648,0.00021212331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933,0.00016497022,0.00008206631,0.000147307,0.00015586415,0.00011983397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024581424,0.00009359549,0.00014855512,0.00016398921,0.0003701605,0.00022032931,0.00023157176,0.00006810554,0.0005564372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016108943,0.00008778645,0.000047089143,0.00039043525,0.0001349637,0.00046627995,0.000054366545,0.00009722131,0.00012855021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005007457,0.00098809,0.023243053,0.00075618114,0.0004628583,0.000016604963,0.15852414,0.0015078746,0.013666161,0.18161082,0.011760888,0.60696256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011962703,0.0015784682,0.058968622,0.0017558071,0.0049073263,0.0000072805933,0.7312104,0.0016426473,0.010547305,0.008477018,0.17769124,0.0020176177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052615535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010146528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60494494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004064216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041225077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95369315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282293003","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4414","title":"“FICTIONAL VISIONS”: AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL REFLECTIONS ON RE-READING THE ALCHEMY OF RACE AND RIGHTS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Alchemy; Vision; Narrative; Reading (process); Politics; Race (biology); Law; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Literature; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.08293260776188556,"score_gpt":0.43388478965345184,"score_spread":0.3509521818915663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282293003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3503329,0.000044281962,0.00039894975,0.14448307,0.0010146255,0.00089642406,0.000013668812,0.0000746694,0.5027414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558175,0.000022496504,0.0009324018,0.0011400565,0.00026197135,0.000039008366,0.000001946315,0.0000059663193,0.00201442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901724,0.00011173338,0.00024270109,0.00015701093,0.0003261488,0.00014518655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983419,0.00088355446,0.00015625857,0.00017983372,0.00034454488,0.00009386506],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049058074,0.000071125425,0.000107812346,0.00022037646,0.0006469563,0.00017551471,0.0002809845,0.000074883035,0.00093513576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074996817,0.000054093307,0.000038838363,0.00089888205,0.0002565666,0.0006880763,0.00004850376,0.000248451,0.000053469586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007344966,0.00048036757,0.0028934558,0.000050847357,0.000103677594,5.047181e-7,0.0262312,0.0001520979,0.0040442655,0.8556578,0.10791222,0.00240007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037229128,0.00017544496,0.13274589,0.0001523933,0.00026086214,0.000002544547,0.013492251,0.00012963539,0.0021389634,0.010612356,0.8396117,0.00030565265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051048268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004123497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8450455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028322444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018417047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283609105","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4535","title":"Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military Objectives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); International humanitarian law; Political science; Operations research; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.043247995522731834,"score_gpt":0.38808964183540984,"score_spread":0.344841646312678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283609105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89652425,0.00016412158,0.007783229,0.02948141,0.0003067136,0.001732287,0.000032926404,0.00009333135,0.06388175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851814,0.000019936362,0.012854162,0.0011378693,0.0004268813,0.000047646976,0.000009221642,0.0000048737597,0.00031800155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988517,0.00008940191,0.00023100576,0.00020714317,0.00045666646,0.00016405756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920917,0.00022332706,0.00008053283,0.0000728679,0.00030091315,0.00011317684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066945027,0.00007292471,0.00010871815,0.00008962184,0.00029551054,0.000069559544,0.00015531872,0.000050544055,0.000076389595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019794463,0.00007446898,0.000027393355,0.00015987885,0.000062062885,0.0006616176,0.000050706258,0.00008177125,0.00002758736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033285457,0.00053010404,0.012406437,0.00015304617,0.000068559086,0.000011817004,0.019925132,0.00108692,0.009122719,0.9269057,0.0064138477,0.02304288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039708195,0.00023789606,0.91079974,0.00022712382,0.00018463349,0.000002545103,0.007874693,0.00043825983,0.0025715523,0.04026299,0.036493793,0.0005096813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010370554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022759388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89839333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066048946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014979432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3036757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290993188","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4549","title":"Taking Workers’ Rights Seriously: Private Prosecutions of Employment Standards Violations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Business; Compliance (psychology); Law; Stigma (botany); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.0647588706876264,"score_gpt":0.37551215272765415,"score_spread":0.3107532820400277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290993188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9106219,0.000065361135,0.0038601244,0.001433072,0.00016135362,0.0009670186,0.00014351925,0.00008464137,0.082663015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964689,0.000030009609,0.0022660682,0.00008017511,0.00017338146,0.00005666505,0.000004714771,0.00001176209,0.0009083234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985241,0.00005884305,0.0003494744,0.00020954586,0.00060345395,0.00025457863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988439,0.000094649055,0.00026791758,0.0002871569,0.00036065464,0.0001457029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003339989,0.00010076138,0.00019031952,0.000114043796,0.00072177313,0.00004881279,0.00051600597,0.00007026663,0.0002807291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016535656,0.00009804257,0.00007119463,0.00058513816,0.00025902223,0.00034386845,0.0001461677,0.0001084235,0.000017968357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002727079,0.0013779706,0.14877558,0.00037134165,0.00032767563,0.000020695807,0.094951615,0.0059916307,0.007834576,0.7210858,0.014388618,0.0046018013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075438025,0.00014157727,0.45604858,0.00042273002,0.00034508653,0.0000028498785,0.0020939126,0.00013326865,0.006199712,0.0027509704,0.53055006,0.00055686495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003607063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000951255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71833485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012651896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003936094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5551368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299262332","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4530","title":"Prisonniers de Guerre aux Mains de Leur Puissance D’origine : Pour Une Application des Conventions de Genève Jusqu’à Leur « Libération et Rapatriement Définitifs »","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Repatriation; Spanish Civil War; Law; Terrorism; Opposition (politics); Humanities; Nationality; Ethnology; Sociology; Politics; Immigration; Art","score_opus":0.06562950516028106,"score_gpt":0.3932945938510184,"score_spread":0.32766508869073735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299262332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80338866,0.00006108913,0.091434434,0.00962803,0.000183107,0.0007850919,0.00003610889,0.00013345935,0.094350025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876172,0.000050611492,0.004770156,0.0014967568,0.0005211963,0.000058083057,0.000024787663,0.000016268157,0.0054449723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846786,0.0001573713,0.00031513872,0.00025875322,0.0003975832,0.00040332013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989906,0.000118276694,0.00019543049,0.00018392323,0.00031601655,0.00019577131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007039381,0.00014064134,0.00016116319,0.00013959597,0.00048668406,0.00017927664,0.00053506694,0.00010482576,0.00017330659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001721708,0.00015183067,0.000083455176,0.00021149799,0.00015603406,0.00049941574,0.00003763973,0.00015516054,0.00005608637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073048555,0.0002220053,0.0023988173,0.00005565184,0.00003509155,0.000006742335,0.010169366,0.0019606894,0.003290299,0.9787779,0.001632228,0.0013781745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021193153,0.0005330379,0.2197077,0.00050812477,0.00093751034,0.000013476484,0.003911766,0.006649843,0.0139017105,0.5563614,0.1941011,0.0012550174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031047903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027867984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42241648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038857714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072983396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6191475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323209304","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4481","title":"The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Implications for the Equality Rights of Canadians with Disabilities: The Case for Education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Balance (ability); Convention; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law; Public administration; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11678599316186042,"score_gpt":0.37101095248984167,"score_spread":0.2542249593279813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323209304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601492,0.000119034645,0.00017601052,0.02464636,0.00011362506,0.003994614,0.0004680024,0.000014145427,0.010319007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975496,0.000017218597,0.00010141129,0.00008525232,0.000077606215,0.0008104052,0.000004939639,0.0000067400206,0.0013468383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990693,0.0001770099,0.00023152624,0.00015468022,0.00018095438,0.00018655533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921894,0.0065538506,0.00022446088,0.00026529405,0.0007109432,0.000056069526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006091733,0.0001060794,0.00013575084,0.00005254824,0.0026867145,0.00006119839,0.00041818607,0.000039035393,0.000019211424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093278,0.000041160765,0.000055482444,0.00044968797,0.0013922156,0.00017606982,0.000033319393,0.00007049489,3.6528738e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110943816,0.00010007066,0.0008589127,0.00010993897,0.00012466463,3.0308247e-8,0.14612158,0.000027906446,0.000009055123,0.8515449,0.0008892074,0.000102799946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005400964,0.00047876488,0.03372892,0.00020997565,0.0012620836,0.000003465041,0.910684,0.00015846122,0.0006299256,0.012187319,0.03984112,0.00027588764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1771471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41030926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83935755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008315693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018152427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343392338","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4545","title":"What Does it Take to Travel Philosophically Light? A Response to Nielsen","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Criticism; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice; Liberal education; Tribute; Politics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; International relations; Liberal arts education","score_opus":0.10326998472915945,"score_gpt":0.37698644029506423,"score_spread":0.2737164555659048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343392338","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34841737,0.00005406156,0.00026933325,0.5134427,0.0013346828,0.0010424777,0.000045757395,0.000113519556,0.1352801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600028,0.000062291576,0.00089937623,0.032056615,0.0017044258,0.000047698144,0.0000010898456,0.000033623972,0.005192104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967487,0.00038381532,0.0004882846,0.0005357251,0.0010788845,0.0007646245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967304,0.0010773755,0.00008553289,0.00051393796,0.0003934028,0.001199392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013769058,0.00023715827,0.00040798882,0.0003075219,0.000532379,0.00024824982,0.0013536985,0.0002972887,0.00031448985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004835063,0.00020753845,0.00012872674,0.00079537096,0.00034133877,0.0009149481,0.00032595225,0.00037327915,0.0006644169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011920601,0.0014935269,0.0004986456,0.00058056985,0.00025875718,0.0006205,0.43918607,0.00059207727,0.03435767,0.4660004,0.04113135,0.0033598333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020124705,0.0020980672,0.040310454,0.0018621078,0.00062263774,0.000021219113,0.029069431,0.000024835237,0.019702291,0.14065008,0.76079965,0.0028267356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004978999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046965055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7196683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013125366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005312931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8539956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344254071","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4514","title":"WEIGHING THE OPTIONS: A LEGAL APPROACH TO CHILDHOOD OBESITY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Humanities; Childhood obesity; Psychosocial; Political science; Obesity; Psychology; Medicine; Art; Overweight; Psychiatry; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.145770339598534,"score_gpt":0.4480399490024814,"score_spread":0.3022696094039474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344254071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5231034,0.0007899787,0.00535398,0.023264399,0.0027086083,0.0051483703,0.000056933502,0.00026669088,0.43930763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551144,0.000093250135,0.013538119,0.021523347,0.0029052657,0.000466844,0.000013350273,0.00006860313,0.006276786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694574,0.0007577211,0.0006388717,0.00040156022,0.0005982154,0.0006578963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970576,0.00089932606,0.0003516642,0.00067630806,0.00043455014,0.00058056036],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026566854,0.00020149014,0.00037327388,0.00019780848,0.0010254034,0.000086619264,0.0011120085,0.00020214137,0.00019636149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018671455,0.00015395904,0.00006413072,0.00059664267,0.000058639194,0.0009837697,0.0007443481,0.001010465,0.002025231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015515732,0.005860063,0.046467766,0.007164022,0.00035902753,0.000025327325,0.14578608,0.006445229,0.00018887008,0.10600764,0.6759609,0.0041835136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019671894,0.0004288018,0.37138867,0.0010150591,0.00062942714,0.000008688701,0.030362578,0.00045800567,0.00007959288,0.0010138974,0.5920042,0.0006438842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020445902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030942564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43303084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015312595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086353964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345535582","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4512","title":"EXPLORING A LAW FIRM BUSINESS MODEL TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Business model; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.23086943353828068,"score_gpt":0.297934905801743,"score_spread":0.0670654722634623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345535582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6801871,0.0003921724,0.035861604,0.0043602935,0.007639642,0.0026033532,0.00066963607,0.00021197533,0.26807418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902666,0.000044787004,0.0019390137,0.0047450303,0.001663481,0.00033742192,0.000008999134,0.00011499767,0.0008796455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678546,0.00002137494,0.0013048674,0.000988812,0.00015312454,0.0007463716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972493,0.000104082406,0.0004943903,0.0009238575,0.0003829915,0.0008453901],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009085329,0.00034104355,0.0009994571,0.0005410934,0.00016263625,0.0006346239,0.0018122789,0.0001599978,0.00007636386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073510373,0.0004757937,0.00012714301,0.0008094225,0.00007746075,0.002486014,0.0009983311,0.0001865099,0.0015443577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016277733,0.00088025216,0.010898149,0.003056177,0.0004594483,0.000043676988,0.015489501,0.425634,0.00084603275,0.49189892,0.04531027,0.0038558207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016874358,0.003162891,0.10554624,0.0030501175,0.0025540972,0.00004216242,0.008150877,0.1173536,0.014184499,0.12629583,0.58744425,0.015341077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071740866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.542134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034954774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013843107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346395395","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4518","title":"THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT TO HOUSING & THE CANADIAN CHARTER: A CASE COMMENT ON TANUDJAJA V. CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Covenant; Cultural rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.08000862500583227,"score_gpt":0.36071883352819145,"score_spread":0.2807102085223592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346395395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3650759,0.00013003092,0.00003673479,0.22676848,0.0047934805,0.0013903412,0.00016742178,0.00005876225,0.40157884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977251,0.0000015634224,0.00016329557,0.017399082,0.0011713677,0.00003549747,0.000004099251,0.000018889934,0.003955189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978994,0.00017157354,0.0002597577,0.00024200026,0.00095762056,0.000469621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998202,0.00021543127,0.0001102332,0.00045992323,0.000332986,0.00067940564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093565567,0.00013951413,0.00014001447,0.0000919897,0.0014106025,0.00056012033,0.0016234127,0.000059638143,0.00015660992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005942857,0.00009762182,0.00003680059,0.00028770498,0.00016860107,0.00015712931,0.00021861937,0.00020802856,0.000077153585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005394101,0.000046630303,0.0015575701,0.00001115887,0.00008697475,0.00033197462,0.089051284,0.0011139084,0.000038747214,0.02368658,0.8831255,0.00089573103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013261885,0.00002631397,0.00027015564,0.000023791548,0.000040495914,0.0000036096533,0.0028971124,0.000022965816,0.00009836647,0.0000872109,0.99625605,0.00014129041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99162054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99921834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6121751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015524449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016942726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346680361","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4513","title":"RELIGION AND LAW IN R V NS: FINDING SPACE TO RE-THINK THE BALANCING ANALYSIS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Diversity (politics); Critical reflection; Space (punctuation); Law; Sociology; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04927093395199516,"score_gpt":0.35742571655138944,"score_spread":0.3081547825993943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346680361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44691494,0.00021565623,0.0013418879,0.013483395,0.0002797617,0.000514566,0.000017157217,0.00003921038,0.5371934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533415,0.000018858625,0.00087583566,0.0027009442,0.00020405043,0.000008559333,0.0000011336294,0.0000048750035,0.00085156766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989547,0.00011360481,0.00017608567,0.00017135161,0.00034758088,0.00023667866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991171,0.00032966392,0.00007283096,0.00016161875,0.000113873226,0.0002049174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007905864,0.000075086886,0.00017839769,0.00014378717,0.00018519317,0.00010442153,0.0003253911,0.000049100352,0.0000188276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006765619,0.00006284852,0.00003478106,0.0008466525,0.00027095506,0.00021290258,0.00013065357,0.00009794368,0.00001609856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037727463,0.00001677918,0.014884961,0.00001687137,0.000041151096,0.0000051597917,0.009962793,0.0029903855,0.000035494104,0.96897817,0.0028852816,0.00014522731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081241416,0.00026478234,0.04692444,0.00038204365,0.001939322,0.0000025939808,0.042183235,0.00053365744,0.00039371836,0.005612359,0.9000377,0.00091375137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034970272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014888233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9633658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009942305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003418157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97145593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347121535","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4583","title":"INTRODUCTION: GRADUATE STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; CONTEST; Economic Justice; Sociology; Windsor; Law; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.2810159753811594,"score_gpt":0.48420982775155286,"score_spread":0.20319385237039345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347121535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36364567,0.00007041257,0.00035500605,0.3004244,0.0052122194,0.00060922524,0.0000059381387,0.00013371442,0.32954344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841809,0.00001429699,0.0013762942,0.0021482867,0.0037522956,0.00002565905,0.000004003324,0.000012083178,0.008486153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998492,0.00018506945,0.00024522713,0.00019602872,0.00068241765,0.00019926684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983097,0.00013021364,0.00014399241,0.00025008403,0.00092157064,0.0002444552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016028706,0.00007643022,0.000113774506,0.00016512367,0.00022000185,0.00039483415,0.0005404361,0.000055356813,0.0007445458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036613476,0.000080225174,0.000026908177,0.00090403826,0.00010427655,0.0017560569,0.00008930147,0.00027820398,0.00054916955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015959734,0.00072175387,0.013722,0.00007492634,0.0000915472,0.000005497476,0.10760739,0.00047466622,0.00029037124,0.21863523,0.65013546,0.008081574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022687086,0.00005257175,0.031604286,0.000015844218,0.00009879525,0.000001138296,0.01877195,0.0000019294102,0.00041732786,0.0011385095,0.94751734,0.00015342656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009436084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018400085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62053525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012090691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008515373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81522536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2369799645","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4520","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF SMALL CLAIMS COURT: RISING MONETARY LIMITS AND USE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Partition (number theory); Sociology; Mathematics; Art; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.10082545312982537,"score_gpt":0.27100063302034005,"score_spread":0.17017517989051467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2369799645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842603,0.0013182681,0.002448036,0.00030103876,0.00059133297,0.0003419814,0.00007488075,0.000009968414,0.010654162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988988,0.00014402384,0.0004986766,0.000042165866,0.00018529636,0.0000062276326,0.0000037671334,0.00001566679,0.00020535976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987262,0.00003087734,0.0007951117,0.00023353996,0.00005489186,0.0001593743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985491,0.00019326941,0.0007276276,0.00030568964,0.00013424888,0.000090088964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006239807,0.00008615859,0.00037508088,0.00015513042,0.00006455798,0.00008599886,0.00025250617,0.000078790676,0.0000063557054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037324184,0.0000993645,0.000057762307,0.00015590485,0.00015015814,0.000558029,0.00009516666,0.00007144778,0.0000139794165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087812654,0.0002531483,0.7120354,0.00059747056,0.0003601018,0.0000039652527,0.0040289783,0.017178895,0.00077599054,0.2546393,0.005972097,0.003276509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029563666,0.0007307308,0.8825367,0.00036787707,0.00034603276,0.000011891579,0.0038754146,0.03646449,0.0036391926,0.052481867,0.01574858,0.0008408394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009253159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044072318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20215742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008443678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048112208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504227454","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4516","title":"WHEN DISCIPLINES COLLIDE: POLYGAMY AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES ON TRIAL","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1590766274158785,"score_gpt":0.42674200413142765,"score_spread":0.26766537671554913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504227454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8311634,0.00031754872,0.000016307404,0.06782778,0.0011239414,0.0015672065,0.000015086373,0.00006550742,0.09790324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471414,0.000030475105,0.00025805933,0.0008964526,0.0018650154,0.00005978164,5.175563e-7,0.000008764705,0.0021668205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979996,0.0002943024,0.0002569379,0.00026564582,0.0008594304,0.0003240552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987405,0.0006623638,0.0001628398,0.00010051731,0.0002044067,0.00012936068],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016484595,0.00013698071,0.0002984895,0.000056388144,0.0014367454,0.00035367665,0.0007352883,0.000080206504,0.00004027531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002178186,0.00008234486,0.00006867092,0.0003493925,0.0020344085,0.0003854941,0.00034905627,0.00012296892,0.00002741458],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026128208,0.00041544,0.0048879194,0.00013515088,0.0002506386,0.0000072203416,0.5889828,0.00024863274,0.00009037329,0.22085948,0.15108256,0.0069115525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11058612,0.0023963877,0.072895125,0.00043085476,0.0019358068,0.0000021492258,0.47116718,0.00029925333,0.0006500311,0.025205389,0.31214055,0.0022911457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004221449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097353465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1956541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008105859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017775132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506045944","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4682","title":"A Comparative View of Equality Under the UN Convention on the Rights of PERSONS with Disabilities and the Disability Laws of the United States and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Law; Convention","score_opus":0.13039640159392446,"score_gpt":0.3687301803499609,"score_spread":0.23833377875603645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506045944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97655594,0.000028796501,0.000021629776,0.011018597,0.00004296659,0.00053487497,0.00007528754,0.0000028633983,0.011719036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994601,0.000008025708,0.0000065823165,0.0003163504,0.000012106284,0.000011378306,0.0000018526243,0.0000024847095,0.0001811231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979612,0.0010950213,0.0002490754,0.00010691974,0.0004881273,0.00009965494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725944,0.0019661607,0.00023202291,0.00024638168,0.0002479518,0.000048017457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015111167,0.000077543555,0.00021945938,0.000011263862,0.0002270195,0.000033413835,0.00035503693,0.000023181079,0.000032022246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030259314,0.000030851137,0.00003118399,0.00021629984,0.003749061,0.00009960656,0.00008964974,0.00007674626,1.3321933e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032256407,0.00012393203,0.006487639,0.00017973756,0.0000787498,2.8776078e-8,0.12525685,0.0002545301,0.000005608877,0.8668407,0.000405086,0.000044518434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015428258,0.00022041789,0.15343475,0.00033542415,0.00063971756,3.251813e-7,0.791666,0.00033768563,0.0017620095,0.044489495,0.005365523,0.00020586506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6693425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69852406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8223513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040623403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017326925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510090481","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4684","title":"UNE PROCÉDURE EN DIFFICULTÉ: A BLUEPRINT FOR RESOLVING “SPECIAL” EDUCATION DISPUTES THROUGH A QUASI-INQUISITORIAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Process (computing); Administrative law; Political science; Public administration; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.09158201672369119,"score_gpt":0.45602372667372304,"score_spread":0.36444170995003183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510090481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77889055,0.0003498921,0.0056398544,0.021110833,0.022418056,0.00746526,0.000064455024,0.00031137452,0.16374975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649458,0.000010970194,0.00658791,0.00020974412,0.026106644,0.0004939717,0.00001854647,0.000033397842,0.0015929916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978429,0.00018649962,0.0004152906,0.00045464386,0.000724029,0.00037665322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974701,0.00046871533,0.00031456145,0.00029383885,0.0011941508,0.00025867508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007712592,0.00019477107,0.00028984938,0.00009498033,0.00028080936,0.0003080933,0.00090154854,0.00018808151,0.000047584563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052421284,0.00019252404,0.000067964866,0.00064753287,0.00023136813,0.0011905117,0.0001110793,0.00017657425,0.000025015946],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006657881,0.0015804142,0.0019538812,0.0006130064,0.00006697378,0.0000016461496,0.88402945,0.00020828088,0.00029608462,0.07036762,0.03498842,0.005228415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017409305,0.0011249031,0.006843055,0.0009020118,0.00068383856,0.0000025358236,0.47859845,0.000109348526,0.008074492,0.027718136,0.47306693,0.0011353801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022196856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013634271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43807852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037286745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027895523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7850902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512364812","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4678","title":"AN INTRODUCTION TO EXPLORING LAW, DISABILITY, AND THE CHALLENGE OF EQUALITY IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES: PAPERS FROM THE BERKELEY SYMPOSIUM","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08863503913113079,"score_gpt":0.32989222137544344,"score_spread":0.24125718224431264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512364812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89407814,0.00015035426,0.0000023223797,0.10388685,0.00019295815,0.00061463454,0.000020091808,0.000008195048,0.0010464414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863875,0.00024943455,0.00002446338,0.00063543825,0.0003707653,0.000058805574,0.0000031077566,0.0000056985946,0.000013510943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981093,0.0007628989,0.00026653497,0.0002261125,0.00044047175,0.00019472073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981345,0.0012348847,0.00010554701,0.00025338927,0.00015612997,0.00011555618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017915021,0.00010375092,0.00024441577,0.000012088293,0.00028864926,0.00008363115,0.00045750744,0.00002940502,0.00001074663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092884264,0.000052069066,0.000019803176,0.00025332655,0.0011545625,0.00028817603,0.00025467682,0.00013339848,3.6697037e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016090913,0.000110024164,0.05750034,0.00013841035,0.00015778384,9.247822e-7,0.8798792,0.004993687,0.00010914764,0.052593395,0.0008853515,0.0020226536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003441027,0.0001268732,0.23687324,0.000117927746,0.00040153065,1.9697596e-7,0.7269382,0.00045240228,0.00020558326,0.0025740599,0.028469354,0.0003996364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98853725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17937289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022655031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009530414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42540336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518541179","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4688","title":"GROUNDING ACCESS TO JUSTICE THEORY AND PRACTICE IN THE EXPERIENCES OF WOMEN ABUSED BY THEIR INTIMATE PARTNERS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Conceptualization; Economic Justice; Domestic violence; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Poison control; Law; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.08339928655449998,"score_gpt":0.41954575439187247,"score_spread":0.3361464678373725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518541179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.896923,0.00028302582,0.00083819934,0.0006174952,0.0005127396,0.00079366605,0.000010728091,0.000035637022,0.099985525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642444,0.00014377886,0.00038452566,0.0025715446,0.00015325382,0.00018631428,0.0000015840333,0.000017787916,0.000116765426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967545,0.0010327962,0.00046187028,0.00038323636,0.00072564016,0.0006419424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608237,0.0026822432,0.000272154,0.0003401774,0.00030598478,0.00031707378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007333874,0.00020262906,0.0003605299,0.00020599453,0.00024246884,0.0004322928,0.0017229215,0.000102266364,0.00005447122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005728273,0.00015552844,0.000035778143,0.0009384203,0.00048600353,0.0018360162,0.00036983908,0.00018506715,0.0000139764325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007861754,0.00017766707,0.00083358464,0.00017844503,0.000031070835,0.0000078793155,0.972837,0.00020393616,0.00052717805,0.017742207,0.004508674,0.002166213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045336346,0.00020425349,0.005083741,0.00019554156,0.00015851304,0.0000030163453,0.978023,0.00005349805,0.0011137387,0.0011006363,0.013279283,0.0003314222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010395993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045251327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09986876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013838724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023748651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68576914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531021224","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4380","title":"DU MAUVAIS USAGE DE LA TRADITION RECONSTITUÉE : LA MÉDIATION EXTRAJUDICIAIRE EN CHINE","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"China; Mediation; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Economic Justice; People's Republic; Sociology; Law; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03362365252687576,"score_gpt":0.32970309075840404,"score_spread":0.29607943823152827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531021224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64411235,0.0014169499,0.00075701915,0.0028696964,0.001712182,0.00040311637,0.000050600636,0.00006952164,0.34860855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98685974,0.00044661656,0.00084406434,0.0005166492,0.0038986502,0.000019387104,0.000009564074,0.000030595642,0.0073747416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756557,0.0008520742,0.00037803073,0.00026162073,0.0004158328,0.00052689307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982695,0.0008247885,0.00023065742,0.00021208306,0.00007946202,0.00038348945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018726015,0.00021771759,0.00029969437,0.00019012904,0.00035913236,0.00019539293,0.00052401563,0.00034425152,0.0030737747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030555527,0.00023265838,0.00011941019,0.00034706175,0.0006572075,0.0016001132,0.00007616622,0.0003149521,0.00041154693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010914051,0.0011193078,0.024951058,0.0006749916,0.00013698387,0.000037881113,0.065257095,0.00031171902,0.00069677964,0.8454237,0.027212448,0.034068886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011463941,0.00018988538,0.5902036,0.00081763533,0.0013876404,0.000040946386,0.00307901,0.00047223063,0.0013438954,0.015413767,0.3850129,0.0008921174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013986795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030145873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83000994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024159481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039476584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549857026","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4681","title":"ADVOCACY FATIGUE: SELF-CARE, PROTEST, AND EDUCATIONAL EQUITY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Educational equity; Compassion; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.1379444325029854,"score_gpt":0.435669304331348,"score_spread":0.2977248718283626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549857026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.348347,0.00068963174,0.00007853946,0.01212397,0.0018181449,0.0011669252,0.0000140629,0.0000866919,0.635675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918016,0.000100106015,0.0024715352,0.00054847624,0.0010830665,0.00006272829,0.000004173689,0.000011251257,0.003917029],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892735,0.000042393167,0.00016482208,0.00018781994,0.00045913548,0.00021848435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989206,0.00008439336,0.00010035669,0.0001329682,0.00048415846,0.0002774814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037606581,0.000085752414,0.00013366366,0.000079938545,0.00025951458,0.00012433967,0.00035370493,0.000053307744,0.0001284915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050861575,0.00007169962,0.000025933788,0.00026578899,0.00015757643,0.00040444845,0.00030253336,0.0000694602,0.00006169775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001756219,0.0010743797,0.16316003,0.0011105731,0.00023239173,0.000003853846,0.5020732,0.00015184213,0.000054714394,0.08303442,0.2034514,0.04547753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008810202,0.00018505391,0.21124311,0.00015605948,0.00026548014,0.00000128991,0.16310763,0.000011269311,0.00012816329,0.002784918,0.6207634,0.00047259164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013941407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012396605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6434546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117111864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001006549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29238257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553331921","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4683","title":"MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE:  RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND DECISION-MAKING BY ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Volition (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Individualism; Political science","score_opus":0.04227486848726325,"score_gpt":0.3394451055679871,"score_spread":0.2971702370807239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553331921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97656244,0.00032762458,0.00012354294,0.0044192774,0.00012938427,0.0005406325,0.000019603176,0.000041471616,0.017836023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99259996,0.000012889279,0.0063576074,0.00021731644,0.000144776,0.00003988449,0.0000024491565,0.000010393272,0.000614746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860704,0.0000623299,0.00020575825,0.00023648673,0.00064976234,0.00023864837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986553,0.00079240376,0.000098373814,0.00009515582,0.0002235503,0.00013519955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037349545,0.00013246818,0.00016719014,0.000026243031,0.00053763617,0.0001361508,0.00036820685,0.00006076315,0.00006220577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013898722,0.00008316562,0.000025364634,0.00018946918,0.0006486049,0.00054501125,0.00024549974,0.000105257204,0.000016551588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008257247,0.00015929158,0.31714287,0.00013873786,0.00022763884,0.0000051943457,0.630873,0.0005311326,0.00003126342,0.008602902,0.02211082,0.01935137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012102774,0.00014178356,0.44534802,0.00069699256,0.00022358463,0.0000032326893,0.4425949,0.00016359975,0.000065422115,0.00091226207,0.10800922,0.00063071604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015713419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011357893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18827815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023886628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021958696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4135117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556416876","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4679","title":"THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN CANADIAN AND AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Convention; Humanities; Legislation; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06365415592707724,"score_gpt":0.36271423619255044,"score_spread":0.2990600802654732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556416876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290356,0.0000084604735,0.0000056469094,0.015631195,0.000055269058,0.0003551514,0.0000113280785,0.000005211795,0.054892138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998838,0.000011387503,0.000025536345,0.00006444205,0.00003136678,0.000017701288,0.0000014036185,0.0000029447244,0.0010072095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991716,0.00017113936,0.00012311239,0.00010473089,0.0002814247,0.00014799616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987914,0.00072382373,0.0000725135,0.00014002877,0.00014958245,0.0001226764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005386883,0.000048895967,0.000078168596,0.00020979698,0.00031304243,0.00007811178,0.00024780017,0.00002014162,0.000016564238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006033025,0.0000252222,0.000013867622,0.0009243999,0.0013877983,0.0001569691,0.000019630532,0.000059487775,0.0000022837005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011882086,0.00010875211,0.06641407,0.000033928933,0.000026843189,8.5671627e-7,0.08401277,0.0005586923,0.000012897454,0.84649134,0.0018336157,0.00038742158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007386445,0.0005906489,0.32809865,0.00031138,0.00019844148,9.028562e-7,0.46233222,0.00060229277,0.0004338054,0.017320443,0.1890019,0.00037069074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7882604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91753924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8291709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072235154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025499274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5113401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558991063","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4708","title":"THE POLICING OF MAJOR EVENTS IN CANADA: LESSONS FROM TORONTO’S G20 AND VANCOUVER’S OLYMPICS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sport and Mega-Event Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Political science; Order (exchange); Common law; Civil liberties; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.06619481335247833,"score_gpt":0.3547506923968958,"score_spread":0.28855587904441743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558991063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98474395,0.000416367,0.000009104825,0.00095219427,0.00075632706,0.00022851692,0.000021260956,0.0000067623323,0.01286549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878824,0.000057248853,0.00006826118,0.00022504477,0.00019112365,0.000004883745,0.0000012055718,0.000009100254,0.0006548864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877954,0.000060854083,0.00025103928,0.0001377809,0.00047943147,0.0002913762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990708,0.00025119,0.00015653712,0.00017657033,0.00009914511,0.0002457373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046894807,0.00008817634,0.00019883462,0.000032213957,0.000098928824,0.000020478848,0.00044223963,0.000050664643,0.000031025043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005450575,0.00007363853,0.00002081339,0.00014764417,0.00006474162,0.00031596512,0.00012153766,0.000066811976,0.0000011149363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005366363,0.00019158973,0.8550978,0.00014492805,0.00013260145,0.000022360233,0.058211572,0.00034341504,0.0005119675,0.014610327,0.05502086,0.0151759945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011246965,0.000058811136,0.92225844,0.00023584299,0.00017040626,3.15057e-7,0.025478495,0.00003850001,0.0008816693,0.00092305196,0.048557848,0.00027190786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99912494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06716071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004935057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021072703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3738207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561962885","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4553","title":"Marian Roberts, Developing the Craft of Mediation: Reflections on Theory and Practice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Mediation; Field (mathematics); Focus (optics); Sociology; Psychology; Visual arts; Art; Social science; Optics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11279146684816836,"score_gpt":0.4065831191398667,"score_spread":0.29379165229169835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561962885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14137371,0.00024551793,0.011327246,0.09286594,0.0010884034,0.0014369849,0.0000052290466,0.000105746614,0.7515512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99182,0.0004991855,0.0011639928,0.0025823587,0.00038288446,0.000018162244,0.0000016892717,0.000009648031,0.0035220843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989618,0.00029651623,0.00017624229,0.00012641886,0.00032135076,0.00011768526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789244,0.0015962699,0.0001640605,0.00013933405,0.00016751327,0.000040403065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00116533,0.00006112271,0.00009311815,0.00011091303,0.0004010285,0.00004323127,0.0002469605,0.000043402415,0.000101095146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002630987,0.00005132206,0.000021439204,0.00037468463,0.0001429626,0.0004113695,0.000084136984,0.00007130573,0.000010556519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007526247,0.00017708963,0.00334805,0.00016873378,0.0001818019,0.000007654735,0.12931195,0.00039871855,0.00078239973,0.8397014,0.010489435,0.014680127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005605078,0.00016442445,0.16565277,0.00013931066,0.00046232206,0.0000042243582,0.017098254,0.00004307035,0.0010670082,0.002939228,0.81154096,0.00032795474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005910454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057622045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8504463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003460315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118005475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3149727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580019413","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4570","title":"Richard A. Falk, The Costs of War: International Law, The UN and World Order","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; Plea; Normative; Law; Order (exchange); Context (archaeology); Political science; International law; International relations; Ideology; Politics; Use of force; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Economics","score_opus":0.020230781012140688,"score_gpt":0.3217711641448161,"score_spread":0.3015403831326754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580019413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4702789,0.0006455683,0.00022529683,0.05302596,0.0006721042,0.00067022006,0.000042554835,0.000039453626,0.47439995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952242,0.00014388507,0.00016229611,0.0033488984,0.00018946988,0.0000029886864,0.0000017360726,0.0000040887385,0.00092245813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990568,0.00008134717,0.00017218883,0.00012486086,0.0004007206,0.00016406052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992659,0.00019942221,0.000100993566,0.0001669213,0.00020877947,0.00005797372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004394919,0.00007314604,0.00011250115,0.00004520875,0.00019851942,0.00008159553,0.00078927045,0.000041089246,0.000084090236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023234097,0.000048158607,0.000034159515,0.00033305478,0.00026005413,0.0002099119,0.00011890596,0.000114327195,0.000009439911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015488567,0.00022220149,0.0047693425,0.000035079753,0.00011066543,0.000005648535,0.02723344,0.00045286317,0.00028938462,0.9285603,0.016154213,0.022011943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019459492,0.00036806584,0.21088383,0.0004297468,0.0009328391,0.000006253129,0.037058566,0.0024644344,0.00079404935,0.040345922,0.7038088,0.00096157147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016544673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004810266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003095812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000499565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26842412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586153411","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4487","title":"Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’Im, Islam and Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari’a","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Politics; Orientalism; Religious studies; State (computer science); Christianity; Subject (documents); Secular state; Negotiation; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03776179481296774,"score_gpt":0.2991788014757872,"score_spread":0.2614170066628194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586153411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92286414,0.0013946227,0.00012128585,0.0005682451,0.0010014747,0.0005152252,0.000024944926,0.000038430262,0.07347162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763596,0.00026990642,0.0005091149,0.00034133493,0.00048465715,0.000012532492,9.701462e-7,0.000016697464,0.00072884967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879366,0.00011265123,0.0002539563,0.00021903694,0.00034902216,0.00027169724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991728,0.000102652506,0.00019820711,0.00025330795,0.00019759839,0.00007542438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054464897,0.000115558876,0.00022345781,0.00006891963,0.00043222425,0.000048036443,0.00058107567,0.00007703328,0.00019269124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012284884,0.00009269975,0.000044697765,0.00021271163,0.0003988008,0.00028510037,0.00019091464,0.00013544202,0.0000070345045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020794215,0.00024801667,0.00837831,0.00047082966,0.00021446691,0.000016821652,0.88021594,0.00015075717,0.0010583361,0.08062611,0.008840135,0.019572303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016274202,0.0007411146,0.4562811,0.000320796,0.0012022031,0.0000037548791,0.42212278,0.00060959515,0.001448822,0.003958565,0.1104533,0.0012305253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047280225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016463479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45809317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034397184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010695391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7147387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586862425","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4569","title":"Peter Fitzpatrick, Law as Resistance: Modernism, Imperialism, Legalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Resistance (ecology); Modernism (music); Law; Product (mathematics); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Art history; Art; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.03222374480642907,"score_gpt":0.34539891031431935,"score_spread":0.31317516550789026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586862425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057343334,0.00066333986,0.00013150553,0.009974591,0.00090417336,0.0006053086,0.000034643268,0.00018067507,0.93016243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592313,0.0002057164,0.0016519419,0.010352874,0.001755935,0.000017785416,0.0000062726785,0.000022472297,0.02675567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979514,0.00013450548,0.0003163938,0.00036603157,0.00075836206,0.0004733177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988854,0.000091481255,0.00014946384,0.00035662312,0.00026300276,0.0002540545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042625258,0.00018395734,0.00028396238,0.000021570033,0.0005646828,0.00034443973,0.0009864323,0.00026364715,0.00061841635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021248002,0.0001747043,0.00016525459,0.00037388777,0.0002692793,0.00080998335,0.0000897336,0.00022574622,0.00013774674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023453386,0.00017465242,0.000039167084,0.0001121983,0.000051122788,0.000021634838,0.062596716,0.000089792666,0.0035940649,0.83650106,0.096019976,0.00056509493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004709348,0.00008520263,0.0008443293,0.00009842366,0.00020901799,0.0000011504607,0.0034705873,0.0000032318374,0.0020365678,0.018008806,0.9743669,0.00040487555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090270484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061349873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90340674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009314586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015414697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71242344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587580689","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4374","title":"‘A FORUM FOR DISCUSSION’ AND A PLACE OF RESPITE: JEWISH LAWYERS AND TORONTO’S READING LAW CLUB","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Club; Political science; Humanities; Reading (process); Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art; History; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024508037153454603,"score_gpt":0.3098396618121854,"score_spread":0.2853316246587308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587580689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41196233,0.014868771,0.00047820402,0.014928704,0.0032077564,0.0027368725,0.00044439032,0.00013654024,0.55123645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881893,0.00018086488,0.00085579423,0.00056358473,0.00040670176,0.000025771502,0.0000020053487,0.000018698554,0.00975727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999183,0.00004247657,0.00016915484,0.00014000555,0.00018741087,0.00027797415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999298,0.00016501272,0.00010104916,0.00011780175,0.000063122396,0.00025504408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046059268,0.000066691646,0.00017440302,0.00009460198,0.000374255,0.00012868631,0.00018574666,0.00007866914,0.000090067086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023992865,0.00006685343,0.0000342305,0.000082344755,0.00036175753,0.0008818685,0.00008823056,0.000046418496,0.0000018887575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082186837,0.00029965624,0.016745387,0.0023794733,0.00016547395,0.0000036283066,0.18519647,0.00002324358,0.0027308327,0.53975755,0.17760205,0.07427435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035804271,0.00007671259,0.005118627,0.00012479194,0.00016684532,6.616389e-7,0.010968854,0.00001080824,0.000088180896,0.00026168305,0.982655,0.00016982746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13659962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5467375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80505294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017759769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118406184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86914986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587705529","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4509","title":"John Reilly, Bad Medicine: A Judge’s Struggle for Justice in a First Nations Community","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Jargon; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Business","score_opus":0.039941859694052236,"score_gpt":0.33230249773720716,"score_spread":0.29236063804315493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587705529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29543167,0.0002578706,0.0003451911,0.022436943,0.0048907297,0.0020703885,0.0002677189,0.00013552798,0.674164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911271,0.00009252359,0.00081772933,0.0009392645,0.0009859318,0.000103476224,0.0000123985465,0.000024603838,0.00589701],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868745,0.00012527315,0.00032086615,0.00018415273,0.0003586758,0.00032361224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975977,0.0013677952,0.00013861136,0.00035973577,0.00028468005,0.0002514715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001177743,0.000101350175,0.00023183806,0.000904956,0.0017086791,0.00018275532,0.0009662603,0.00015315873,0.00087613636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006187742,0.00012943242,0.000056793127,0.00077558926,0.0006475755,0.00045170245,0.00010854173,0.00045451484,0.000040117506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003358012,0.00086517294,0.002973019,0.0030865327,0.00009599146,0.000023278775,0.21741192,0.00040390843,0.0020329247,0.2349508,0.5303583,0.0074623413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067462865,0.000081628954,0.019014869,0.00017752935,0.00026124378,9.3031156e-7,0.009186149,0.000047713886,0.00002444795,0.000802417,0.9695024,0.00022602468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4361652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6956954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027519176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007760679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588286494","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816","title":"DRIVING THE GIFT HOME","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Narrative; Constitutionalism; Section (typography); Treaty; Politics; Sociology; Colonialism; History; Law; Political science; Literature; Art; Democracy","score_opus":0.06954741630039481,"score_gpt":0.3789582868100378,"score_spread":0.309410870509643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588286494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7587552,0.00020328884,0.000054144577,0.029223684,0.001213706,0.0006664154,0.0000071343784,0.00008079452,0.20979564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406403,0.00007695139,0.00025475738,0.00035257518,0.0008777466,0.000023155626,3.0023918e-7,0.000011377347,0.0043391017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863017,0.00009172263,0.00019001948,0.00021263243,0.00051854615,0.00035690368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869746,0.00029070003,0.00022851782,0.00045512928,0.00019638544,0.00013178233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000591977,0.00011817231,0.00020185031,0.000027929133,0.002640997,0.0005897478,0.0019472378,0.000073403695,0.00021286432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021395695,0.00008031212,0.00008137159,0.00009595286,0.0006392874,0.00068270246,0.0006147394,0.00015364382,0.00014187228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018622882,0.00039750396,0.45201465,0.0005347842,0.0006889222,0.00004958577,0.27358645,0.0003817434,0.0041307146,0.09713321,0.121954,0.04894219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021220781,0.000026486272,0.85220885,0.00008061633,0.00016126952,2.5727275e-7,0.008072275,0.000015390791,0.00030688127,0.00037333442,0.13830554,0.00023689409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069085136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002909724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4001942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071346614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061965955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588847849","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4376","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 225 RE-EVALUATING INDEPENDENCE: THE EMERGING PROBLEM OF CROWN-POLICE ALIGNMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Plea; Windsor; Warrant; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.15238276535311923,"score_gpt":0.44048746539275985,"score_spread":0.2881047000396406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588847849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87113184,0.0010624272,0.00067452027,0.0069120787,0.0012369592,0.002076938,0.00002710981,0.000114341594,0.116763815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952462,0.00010445697,0.0010161594,0.0007045723,0.0011695337,0.000082733524,0.0000018644129,0.000035077777,0.0016394006],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955286,0.00042298363,0.00077001314,0.00042127163,0.0019017919,0.00095537404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712044,0.000760187,0.00062954065,0.00060222344,0.0005270437,0.00036059073],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004344322,0.000274864,0.00042684414,0.00018006317,0.0007086739,0.0002936436,0.0024487188,0.00018923452,0.0016453558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006887459,0.00022587512,0.00013806924,0.0007750814,0.00042589524,0.0025217067,0.0008561158,0.00035307193,0.000107298125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014005725,0.0020163956,0.20007837,0.0059383907,0.0006875064,0.000015607307,0.5585271,0.007152461,0.021062044,0.06517019,0.08136933,0.05658199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031708383,0.0012146434,0.37511292,0.005382299,0.006609632,0.000022968006,0.2706247,0.00060468825,0.058773924,0.0027222277,0.27162498,0.004136187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011448359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012059617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28790244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001252715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040224244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590199685","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4555","title":"Rachel Murray, The Role of National Human Rights Institutions at the International and Regional Levels: The Experience of Africa; Brian Burdekin, assisted by Jason Naum, National Human Rights Institutions in the Asia-Pacific Region, The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Human rights; Constitution; Promotion (chess); Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.13252074511468057,"score_gpt":0.354440683926519,"score_spread":0.22191993881183844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590199685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7345385,0.00035177145,0.000030322992,0.01109273,0.00036081692,0.0012398893,0.0001309707,0.000048461854,0.25220653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925666,0.000016462047,0.000038067894,0.00030683444,0.0006144599,0.00015768112,0.00007536006,0.00001472452,0.0062098214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551576,0.00058473594,0.00087417406,0.00050822744,0.0021228546,0.00039423004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744105,0.0006597197,0.0006340833,0.0005868642,0.00056449085,0.00011378653],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010910961,0.00031969397,0.000331046,0.00029676128,0.008680144,0.0002546132,0.0031923659,0.00018771902,0.0003492969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011052405,0.00015947549,0.0001882031,0.0007896933,0.0058229268,0.0014462479,0.0004043751,0.00052100787,0.000013763057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050987062,0.0003711633,0.0006533633,0.000014966422,0.000105483574,0.0000075879593,0.051572915,0.00014773481,0.0006460941,0.9161069,0.030302089,0.000020727175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009428174,0.000068062494,0.053987365,0.0001712109,0.00012065715,0.00004724159,0.0042748945,0.000051012415,0.0009942274,0.05548387,0.88350165,0.00035701628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005446111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026649082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.860623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021159867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048543158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591022630","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4571","title":"Jane Kelsey, Serving Whose Interests? The Political Economy of Trade in Services Agreements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Politics; Trade in services; Political science; World trade; International trade; Economics; Law; Trade barrier","score_opus":0.028717323815710613,"score_gpt":0.33554652938629176,"score_spread":0.30682920557058113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591022630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5878205,0.00010465657,0.00005421369,0.15087269,0.00030476614,0.0008986124,0.000014560926,0.00006114048,0.2598689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948113,0.000005084759,0.00018517658,0.004645324,0.00020741984,0.0000040389455,0.0000021009746,0.000011755021,0.00012778805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985696,0.00013915762,0.00041485758,0.00021276192,0.0002955979,0.00036801127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991673,0.00018596972,0.00015656133,0.00026997738,0.000074920754,0.00014525893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034496823,0.000117207266,0.0002223251,0.00015356128,0.000102510465,0.00010919999,0.0011330788,0.00007251907,0.0002630681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001127965,0.00010529186,0.00004297943,0.00060581457,0.00014815731,0.0005700698,0.00012789367,0.00013483201,0.000020675438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083381674,0.00047982877,0.046482835,0.00042297455,0.000054614262,0.00001153116,0.026324155,0.00021483928,0.0011695725,0.9215887,0.00076230796,0.002405227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012529964,0.00020890727,0.9120549,0.00077685487,0.00027254486,0.0000022651766,0.02462898,0.00024324657,0.009290367,0.01548877,0.035216484,0.0005637076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010982491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020683373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008554459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011358188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42936775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592714842","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4842","title":"RECONCILIATION IN TRANSLATION: INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS AND CANADA’S TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Mainstream; Sensibility; Law; Sociology; Political science; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.0643599226041288,"score_gpt":0.32993196547455506,"score_spread":0.26557204287042624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592714842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429275,0.00023162588,0.000027869588,0.0070087984,0.00034930513,0.00039019226,0.000041693194,0.0000151140885,0.04900794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983681,0.00030280673,0.00026616274,0.00018714377,0.0001840036,0.000010623813,0.0000061156315,0.0000052741466,0.00066975947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991963,0.00006821459,0.0001804662,0.00016575583,0.00024128029,0.00014801984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994188,0.00012146106,0.00013662179,0.00013407474,0.00007859095,0.00011043195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038182898,0.000072420626,0.00013012998,0.000015878128,0.0008424913,0.0002050939,0.00022222823,0.00010812528,0.000048335918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023239551,0.000074563024,0.000017196067,0.000059433038,0.0001277675,0.00078619504,0.000018150318,0.00011516094,7.2480145e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045603042,0.00037122457,0.18742892,0.0012194243,0.00014846471,0.00003993487,0.56290036,0.00041720129,0.0015512466,0.045803364,0.024183532,0.1754803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011985345,0.000080857884,0.84328246,0.00025936493,0.00014945923,0.000002594723,0.015984355,0.00015407748,0.00041813368,0.0015436026,0.13654125,0.00038529583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35235643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.806258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65585357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011714413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004670244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65195626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594467543","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4841","title":"BUILDING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES TO CLIMATE CHANGE, DISASTERS, AND DISPLACEMENT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; University of Windsor","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Vulnerability (computing); Climate change; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Disaster risk reduction; Hazard; Psychological intervention; Forced migration; Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Computer science; Computer security; Refugee; Law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.37581449620701735,"score_gpt":0.4016484913620534,"score_spread":0.025833995155036038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594467543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441438,0.0000565232,0.0017147417,0.01841761,0.0010907508,0.0011025402,0.00006641882,0.000048743317,0.03335888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99470586,0.00011503288,0.003540945,0.0003870387,0.0008068789,0.000089754096,0.0000071430172,0.000015647394,0.0003317069],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885976,0.00003467013,0.00019146246,0.00026707645,0.00039478912,0.00025225646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992494,0.000069138776,0.00019322002,0.0002442023,0.0000857822,0.0001582459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000521291,0.00010503058,0.00013633288,0.00013214748,0.0005367454,0.0005563659,0.0006474126,0.00005176435,0.00006217707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035218976,0.000110439,0.00002680069,0.00007772843,0.0001177239,0.0010108122,0.0004036805,0.00005189756,0.000021345724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008603113,0.0005044607,0.22275071,0.0009657274,0.00020130807,0.000014067597,0.3294268,0.00063558767,0.0043510143,0.29943198,0.0044767116,0.13638133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014368342,0.00024298036,0.8742259,0.00096252555,0.00043339765,0.0000019215438,0.04143239,0.0027215905,0.0021620262,0.0012506223,0.07411087,0.0010189273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013025893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037914575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6514752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009093295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025724536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5365049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594620988","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4845","title":"WHO IS MY NEIGHBOUR? THE DUTY OF CARE IN THE IMMIGRATION CONTEXT: A PERSPECTIVE FROM CANADIAN CASE LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty of care; Immigration; Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Immigration law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Narrative; State (computer science); Power (physics); Sociology; History; Liability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04971966374203982,"score_gpt":0.35720547239973727,"score_spread":0.3074858086576974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594620988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8161849,0.0006028922,0.00009501236,0.015591589,0.00037101706,0.0012205715,0.0004359044,0.000013847071,0.16548426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978724,0.00004083452,0.000028442502,0.0016022152,0.00034315878,0.000014684973,0.0000038522426,0.000008818987,0.00008559859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988453,0.00025273862,0.0001901105,0.00021028545,0.00029491057,0.00020668292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998619,0.00023366757,0.00020222913,0.0005472257,0.0003082766,0.000089603076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054555736,0.00009404397,0.00014722768,0.00006865766,0.00100086,0.00032683383,0.0010428309,0.00006618654,0.00008979889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006181318,0.00006686454,0.00005010158,0.00012384402,0.00034987569,0.0006186926,0.00009638351,0.0001889953,0.000022274435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002859224,0.000060534152,0.002856242,0.00014877708,0.000051677707,0.00032288095,0.8521366,0.00003184724,0.00014246214,0.13167405,0.0029864274,0.009302558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036238888,0.0001620455,0.037467014,0.00017872383,0.0004584251,0.0000074775867,0.93359596,0.000057503457,0.00073534,0.000742277,0.026036631,0.00019624493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9532607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9678168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18168749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013506904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029164914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7697907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594863900","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4371","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 103 A VIEW FROM WITHIN: RECONCEPTUALIZING MEDIATOR INTERACTIONS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Mediator; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Biology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.13406355741304943,"score_gpt":0.3989960962974119,"score_spread":0.26493253888436247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594863900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75386596,0.001502751,0.002544787,0.006845574,0.009681845,0.0021253855,0.00009277992,0.00041327384,0.22292764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912409,0.00015570952,0.00057162123,0.0015675685,0.0031820377,0.00007900424,0.000022562816,0.000039729355,0.003140829],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976794,0.00023719986,0.000544334,0.00035930515,0.0006433347,0.0005364307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980621,0.0005246521,0.00042639673,0.00039156634,0.00021463908,0.00038065537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008709917,0.00022141279,0.00034720163,0.00027890684,0.00039701737,0.0004156091,0.0011497953,0.00012803458,0.008494388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075487926,0.00023213546,0.00010484992,0.0006424356,0.00014759517,0.004274983,0.00042169634,0.00023679466,0.00068694894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005826212,0.0017987676,0.20367692,0.0011850251,0.0012553696,0.000018797453,0.41059223,0.0003744751,0.0045729196,0.075767666,0.20909175,0.09108346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009119896,0.000060097344,0.110743724,0.0005174289,0.0013208459,6.698508e-7,0.023108808,0.00015473872,0.0025924996,0.0004192785,0.8592415,0.0009284069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026110278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001617314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65014976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014502367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014594592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595757146","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4379","title":"HOLLY CULLEN, THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE ELIMINATION OF CHILD LABOR (The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Law and economics; Economic history; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.027924301508131674,"score_gpt":0.31310035707679307,"score_spread":0.2851760555686614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595757146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2841265,0.0016696262,0.00029510734,0.034009557,0.0014388385,0.0015736202,0.00008926513,0.000035204677,0.6767623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972815,0.000026620522,0.000094526775,0.0014030405,0.00079563004,0.00002199639,0.000007808619,0.000010096692,0.0003587814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843,0.0003326012,0.0003182448,0.00011997447,0.0005894951,0.00020966073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988323,0.0003343608,0.00026917594,0.0002859631,0.00023758615,0.00004061017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022860754,0.00008422425,0.00011650235,0.00008213387,0.0001797181,0.00013046594,0.0012430896,0.000054934244,0.00017991687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074790535,0.000050316397,0.000047792197,0.00038793733,0.00024626387,0.0010743751,0.0001465065,0.0001949646,0.000020478235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019159154,0.0025780678,0.07593148,0.00084261433,0.00037249934,0.000008483278,0.35197031,0.001304972,0.0034144549,0.26817888,0.21167992,0.08180239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037667793,0.00011735336,0.1434075,0.00015286171,0.00035877185,0.0000029236598,0.06850827,0.0000854975,0.0022865324,0.00034182487,0.7841992,0.00016261211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002129077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006308343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71315503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026240721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045690864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32185417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597031627","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4813","title":"STL’UL NUP: LEGAL LANDSCAPES OF THE HUL’QUMI’NUM MUSTIMUHW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Identity (music); Meaning (existential); Ethnology; Humanities; Relation (database); Law; Geography; Political science; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Ecology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05527603088047359,"score_gpt":0.36526010277526394,"score_spread":0.3099840718947904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597031627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8275552,0.00021574447,0.00001887318,0.010349505,0.0012510055,0.00072146714,0.00004004967,0.00005247197,0.15979572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937594,0.000056840112,0.0002478027,0.00023425814,0.0006984296,0.000019456613,7.7669034e-7,0.000015472277,0.0049675456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808246,0.00012925666,0.00033513794,0.00028150555,0.00076356763,0.00040806696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823993,0.0002339654,0.00045672292,0.00057794986,0.00035208045,0.00013935135],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000507994,0.00017772935,0.00035766183,0.000042641695,0.0014647973,0.00030905186,0.0022433538,0.00013083158,0.00025483355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021021895,0.00012282153,0.0001626717,0.00016549489,0.000648273,0.0007469075,0.0007805675,0.00020489254,0.00005004689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009818277,0.0014968442,0.44764683,0.002583894,0.0015644458,0.000061153696,0.2275186,0.00195681,0.0170423,0.08603594,0.17540824,0.037703127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080266973,0.00008519144,0.8335537,0.0003111698,0.0005041578,7.8291583e-7,0.011155724,0.000049346272,0.0040120385,0.0002585107,0.14881314,0.00045360575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0143037625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055715116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38590685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076355376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013455872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597111891","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4817","title":"STSQEY’ULÉCW RE ST'EXELCEMC (ST’EXELEMC LAWS FROM THE LAND)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Kinship; Sociology; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.050943558763418245,"score_gpt":0.36630685130774565,"score_spread":0.3153632925443274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597111891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.594148,0.0003076631,0.000053010044,0.0069838394,0.0025107174,0.0010314492,0.00017241293,0.000074285505,0.39471865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749238,0.0014727585,0.00052873325,0.0008637181,0.005737455,0.000013405664,0.000029396148,0.000040474737,0.016390288],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979004,0.00023595695,0.0003411401,0.00035990495,0.0006134316,0.0005491165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763703,0.000473162,0.00038299614,0.0009544862,0.00029914465,0.0002531678],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010159102,0.00016776673,0.0002692418,0.0000605373,0.007300293,0.0005390072,0.0022279643,0.00018298485,0.0010123609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001417831,0.0001187922,0.00008107964,0.00014134034,0.00040313732,0.0006718537,0.000031468237,0.00024658735,0.0002234411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003656427,0.0006778994,0.091148995,0.00040097572,0.00024360266,0.00002695951,0.72313875,0.0000784214,0.000040298426,0.10317003,0.07542545,0.005282964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028729942,0.000048780785,0.08642479,0.00011887851,0.00016026711,3.3307123e-7,0.004797466,0.000007950525,0.00015184059,0.0015837472,0.9061887,0.0002298998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2802107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65461236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8307633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010791076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037181242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597833929","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4370","title":"SCORCHED EARTH: THE USE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS TO STIFLE COMPETITION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Covenant; Humanities; Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Political science; Business; Welfare economics; Economics; Art; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.20526493107737948,"score_gpt":0.393474131765862,"score_spread":0.18820920068848251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597833929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96270794,0.000043543972,0.0027428963,0.0043181553,0.00028136504,0.0010600068,0.000090300564,0.0000345981,0.028721223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971142,0.000017167173,0.0012104023,0.0005002165,0.00029189824,0.000030253263,0.000002178036,0.000008217744,0.00082549884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990132,0.000101494945,0.00019445269,0.00011902502,0.00033167395,0.00024015241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989017,0.00038624892,0.00011833628,0.00024673773,0.00018662302,0.00016032558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036652744,0.00006647954,0.00012335405,0.00006392893,0.00020956314,0.00006930752,0.00043061134,0.000045430115,0.00010517204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000507974,0.0000526956,0.000038804686,0.0004772981,0.0001268767,0.00048524787,0.00016321341,0.00008455139,0.000092830924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048611162,0.001110849,0.03484311,0.00023735953,0.00013131807,0.0000017306897,0.0676231,0.0059998906,0.021695556,0.8402161,0.017800793,0.009854091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027152948,0.00008932275,0.43330157,0.00013658484,0.00019019048,3.7962596e-7,0.0033322508,0.00007865273,0.008323508,0.0002968069,0.55374014,0.00023908677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034243546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004282523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83991927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000319368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009940392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5176623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599494580","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4808","title":"LEARNING FROM BEAR-WALKER: INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS AND INTERCULTURAL LEGAL EDUCATION IN CANADIAN LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal profession; Law; Legal education; Political science; Viewpoints; Legal research; Sociology; Empowerment; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03796338000169707,"score_gpt":0.3857957892049488,"score_spread":0.3478324092032517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599494580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79612976,0.000046981062,0.0000051621632,0.017791783,0.0006884366,0.00029511523,0.0000077005025,0.000016276235,0.18501881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99416715,0.000023881059,0.00040631427,0.0016610319,0.0004085845,0.000018089237,0.000015184555,0.000011116543,0.0032886553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889547,0.00011521964,0.00022913747,0.00022463585,0.00021966279,0.0003158839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989195,0.000110683904,0.0002025372,0.00022381365,0.00025373106,0.00028974313],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004719871,0.00009923859,0.00013810617,0.00019147826,0.0011032202,0.0017042138,0.0005617352,0.00010564647,0.0002508897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001985459,0.00010884519,0.000021451942,0.00019551859,0.00016882313,0.0031554718,0.00007483327,0.0005034051,0.0000618188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020472912,0.0004945622,0.3440875,0.00016143413,0.00014145722,0.000028630164,0.24394995,0.00037553886,0.0013535578,0.32516527,0.0150901005,0.06894728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002539347,0.000042054096,0.20056295,0.00012496072,0.00006680137,0.0000015386438,0.036249515,0.000024207731,0.00013180135,0.0003177257,0.7619668,0.0002576774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9193725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023103466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041204267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600341827","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4852","title":"THE IDEA OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE: REFLECTIONS ON NEW ZEALAND’S ACCIDENT COMPENSATION (OR PERSONAL INJURY) SYSTEM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; CLARITY; Law; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17549995626458265,"score_gpt":0.45649297266376465,"score_spread":0.280993016399182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600341827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7798103,0.00012117235,0.0011935931,0.063871294,0.005947709,0.0030496952,0.00006864765,0.00019861327,0.14573894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907383,0.00005514097,0.00019607492,0.00045335427,0.0010512501,0.000033565084,0.0000012505096,0.000018355764,0.0074527217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778754,0.00014756946,0.0004434427,0.00034276413,0.0008850193,0.0003936537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758977,0.0006266975,0.00047489698,0.0005941824,0.00039635948,0.0003180977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009333982,0.00016988961,0.0002995412,0.00013942321,0.0018184095,0.0009885107,0.0021808844,0.0001059604,0.0001242485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019625365,0.00013004431,0.00009501171,0.00027358782,0.00020761191,0.0009348532,0.00039726787,0.00018271062,0.00010006053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013537007,0.0007436341,0.03098731,0.0030215965,0.00049181824,0.00007329967,0.104009725,0.0027213788,0.0069916537,0.19788295,0.5824895,0.057050105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014576691,0.0016799335,0.59413177,0.003919076,0.002856309,0.000010514948,0.0438357,0.00028649258,0.007961961,0.0007513108,0.3418342,0.0012750603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018760124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016539847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56314445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020972006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051296357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602033633","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4368","title":"JUDGING SELECTION: APPOINTING CANADIAN JUDGES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Political science; Humanities; Commission; Law; Art","score_opus":0.09361937532165128,"score_gpt":0.4106273228878456,"score_spread":0.3170079475661943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602033633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12793833,0.000070003276,0.00040004274,0.047755335,0.0017121782,0.0003531883,0.000005340516,0.00008639143,0.8216792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898293,0.000005857894,0.002283505,0.003316868,0.0014886068,0.000015682464,0.0000024778924,0.000011822303,0.0030459068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893135,0.00009530953,0.00019410846,0.000118583666,0.00025129222,0.0004093754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892616,0.00020103046,0.000112071604,0.000116938834,0.00028807574,0.00035569174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009484934,0.00007162686,0.00009412825,0.00028792673,0.00057731,0.00023822875,0.00030171665,0.00006934439,0.0020364458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017112365,0.00008147032,0.000026669524,0.000998461,0.000058401325,0.0018187752,0.00003487119,0.00021041647,0.000267245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031160493,0.00028534117,0.42365715,0.00018513564,0.00009893056,0.0000017269299,0.10928721,0.00023765602,0.0009149694,0.25071493,0.19023658,0.024349198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007726274,0.00001030122,0.06418585,0.000025806155,0.00008326752,0.0000015608642,0.009205709,0.000019236377,0.00044523922,0.00010328763,0.9256663,0.00017621706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17846937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0778024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.861891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017794916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011145173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602182565","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4811","title":"WANISKĀ: REIMAGINING THE FUTURE WITH INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Narrative; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Commission; Political science; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05045419123617117,"score_gpt":0.3497937817313528,"score_spread":0.2993395904951816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602182565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.704895,0.00041321007,0.0001346159,0.07834725,0.001564632,0.001511067,0.00005879508,0.00015426382,0.21292114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402934,0.00010709239,0.0007607799,0.0005320729,0.0020853905,0.000047647292,0.0000017680729,0.000017127748,0.0024187989],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985316,0.00008910473,0.00018226553,0.0002430584,0.00056121935,0.0003927489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880975,0.00014253925,0.00024817415,0.00042968916,0.0002311024,0.00013871239],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037547597,0.00015031868,0.00021568032,0.00003507243,0.0042946776,0.00076590205,0.0014945213,0.0000751668,0.000116628325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024257567,0.00008525407,0.0000655356,0.00013726029,0.0007417425,0.0010020635,0.00014896019,0.0003029226,0.000044472985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000512438,0.000535814,0.067118585,0.00042954937,0.0009556072,0.00017371838,0.7470946,0.00051214825,0.0008529623,0.08151377,0.054732107,0.045568753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005580543,0.00014137955,0.51031893,0.00015416638,0.00050400133,0.0000045565725,0.05202099,0.000009981133,0.00029169704,0.0002993282,0.435247,0.00044989985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010480583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008021885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69507354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009413767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018233692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602983245","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4810","title":"DECOLONIZING AND INDIGENIZING: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10028188575883995,"score_gpt":0.3877295488309621,"score_spread":0.28744766307212216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602983245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6712168,0.0011959649,0.0003606928,0.054936085,0.0029582477,0.0038018185,0.00015926085,0.00021804665,0.2651531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912208,0.00007994134,0.0044693113,0.0020253668,0.00064350467,0.00005000553,0.0000011959285,0.000011282031,0.0014985948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991889,0.00003377383,0.00015345908,0.00019120087,0.00018966672,0.00024300368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908954,0.00019868466,0.00015171745,0.0002314201,0.00018586376,0.00014274543],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004127771,0.00008124946,0.00015290512,0.000009786563,0.0027637912,0.0007842596,0.00040480448,0.00012895373,0.00005994307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013705861,0.00008078375,0.000053228774,0.000036205267,0.00033054498,0.0010807811,0.00013732053,0.00011028142,0.000010617762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024731924,0.000048418657,0.0030452022,0.00013849614,0.000062808234,0.000002835551,0.02384333,0.000015621272,0.0010617389,0.95107615,0.020141458,0.00053920964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027461925,0.0002621761,0.043238606,0.0004898255,0.0011041093,0.0000046016876,0.037452266,0.000061034552,0.011648464,0.2681765,0.6335617,0.0012545852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006566097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001766632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68289965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032533146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001666351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603157990","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4846","title":"« PLACER LE CITOYEN AU CŒUR DU SYSTÈME » : ORIGINE ET FONDEMENTS D’UNE IDÉE POPULAIRE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Humanities; Political science; Civil society; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.06089158060743008,"score_gpt":0.38144957999142054,"score_spread":0.32055799938399043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603157990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6982544,0.00007460306,0.00021681946,0.045527752,0.0018123072,0.00057531963,0.000034271252,0.00007306371,0.25343144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895587,0.000040646322,0.00023422523,0.000656788,0.0010975947,0.000022639262,0.0000015488297,0.000016778982,0.008371095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979092,0.0000907035,0.00027721998,0.00036123194,0.0008589581,0.00050268084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986189,0.00009833109,0.0004207744,0.00044100187,0.00016617446,0.0002548207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008827716,0.00015415132,0.0002791064,0.00005414146,0.0014838349,0.00048539756,0.0018846701,0.000119489654,0.00015578643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009417825,0.00015098984,0.00008860168,0.00025655574,0.00037352648,0.0013269059,0.0003623055,0.00012716587,0.00006600407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003041544,0.00062105496,0.5231776,0.00041459044,0.00018479704,0.00008393048,0.057281073,0.0005298894,0.0007987786,0.25290275,0.14270563,0.020995734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007715683,0.00009201181,0.74764454,0.00025993574,0.00014408323,0.0000011521487,0.00579605,0.00008781078,0.00018800465,0.0025923739,0.24192533,0.0004971503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31768152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06618062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29130426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020268002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011077252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603315228","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4809","title":"LISTENING TO LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Active listening; Humanities; Identity (music); Sociology; Indigenous; Character (mathematics); Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08423744014614801,"score_gpt":0.39914969431920366,"score_spread":0.3149122541730557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603315228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30928892,0.00008558699,0.0000778492,0.018025208,0.0009872001,0.0007237981,0.000013403327,0.00009738065,0.67070067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899125,0.000014624084,0.0017225528,0.0012790468,0.0008023105,0.000027176879,4.7968274e-7,0.0000137549005,0.0062275333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859315,0.00005705252,0.00020706649,0.0002645095,0.0004928156,0.00038538285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880046,0.00013870314,0.00016488536,0.00037539308,0.00025949712,0.0002610557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004114998,0.00012502202,0.00024222839,0.0000377198,0.0018758082,0.0006124869,0.0014102572,0.00008101719,0.00017630703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016945123,0.00011261694,0.000071424976,0.000103516315,0.00034324577,0.00078703644,0.00061872066,0.00011372259,0.00025972887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005509334,0.0004686478,0.054632008,0.00085381157,0.0005423715,0.00009505105,0.3695933,0.0009068207,0.011837621,0.4061637,0.11441369,0.039942067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005207444,0.00012126988,0.22430357,0.00032271247,0.00028168998,4.63071e-7,0.011276833,0.000015139749,0.0028304397,0.00044969356,0.7592269,0.00065051304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029402759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00767057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009815268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046630874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603352508","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4619","title":"Human Rights, The Rule of Law, and Development in Africa & Human Rights Under African Constitutions: Realizing the Promise for Ourselves","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Rule of law; Law; Law and economics; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11037749475392783,"score_gpt":0.3750578818539226,"score_spread":0.26468038709999475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603352508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65616566,0.00019718545,0.0011376792,0.0016884838,0.0002043028,0.0026292142,0.000016269049,0.00005550902,0.33790568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957731,0.0000014398016,0.0022568654,0.00014425165,0.00012623725,0.00006926997,0.0000033637994,0.000009120403,0.0016163655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983126,0.00009370684,0.0005096601,0.00025682527,0.00041907956,0.000408163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989219,0.00033516038,0.00021246957,0.00023974889,0.00017509882,0.000115666655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018168022,0.0001479782,0.00024008108,0.00014750472,0.0021373904,0.00011894422,0.00060482445,0.00008142922,0.00007455376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004086544,0.00008574535,0.00004012114,0.00022207263,0.0009434698,0.0001603355,0.00012637125,0.00012118803,0.0000050608974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031497377,0.000120951285,0.00015703638,0.00006389956,0.000043820462,0.0000018239216,0.04917883,0.000029502486,0.0002185575,0.94912034,0.0009143957,0.00011934726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007377838,0.000048464866,0.018520994,0.00024460006,0.00012301168,9.811997e-7,0.005487798,0.0000016948555,0.002111482,0.039347555,0.93304235,0.00033329468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004865074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0635655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93212795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113945236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018536703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603518243","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4815","title":"DABAADENDIZIWIN: PRACTICES OF HUMILITY IN A MULTI-JURIDICAL LEGAL LANDSCAPE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Canada Council for the Arts; University of Victoria; Michigan State University","keywords":"Humility; Charter; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Pride; Navajo; Harmony (color); Indigenous; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.12770891809004695,"score_gpt":0.4497432287293902,"score_spread":0.3220343106393433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603518243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.848354,0.0001324982,0.00005769302,0.0024731504,0.0003512598,0.000352388,0.00003093397,0.00002213447,0.14822593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998337,0.000023139035,0.00081601355,0.00010513314,0.00023636287,0.000010441915,0.0000015919543,0.000010752046,0.00045958412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983688,0.00013127447,0.00035994046,0.0002733645,0.0004886967,0.00037790363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982873,0.00021021429,0.00063388364,0.0005137093,0.0001583537,0.00019651228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010499923,0.000114940456,0.00029324117,0.0002002485,0.0003432582,0.00019790766,0.0012965752,0.00014198704,0.00018230046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027291442,0.0001153229,0.00009393722,0.0001996004,0.00056585984,0.000921101,0.00029534707,0.00021574019,0.000017115117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048728753,0.0014495738,0.9232886,0.00083737174,0.00012854859,0.000085768006,0.045718238,0.00006126873,0.00070136646,0.017684044,0.0058216755,0.0037362461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000992784,0.0001079664,0.9592393,0.00020802463,0.00016517003,8.7087324e-7,0.013749475,0.00014824356,0.0010639968,0.00047687453,0.023529714,0.0003175485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011271401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052568894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14998297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021674326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026995773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99531263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603976016","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4843","title":"BEING THE CHANGE: SOCIAL JUSTICE IN EXTERNSHIP PROGRAM EVALUATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Public relations; Narrative; Sociology; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Pedagogy; Social science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.3521164757445121,"score_gpt":0.5410518283749198,"score_spread":0.18893535263040773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603976016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24914694,0.00005951583,0.000065302935,0.18396129,0.0027719464,0.0035375422,0.0000068458985,0.00007391958,0.5603767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944424,0.000015007444,0.0003474661,0.0017299061,0.0021375867,0.0005153594,0.0000031471627,0.000011158785,0.0007979522],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983457,0.00030477133,0.00025252817,0.0001937214,0.0006408668,0.00026242144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846035,0.00032878006,0.0003281276,0.00033096096,0.00048813515,0.000063629705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028401196,0.000087005064,0.000117454736,0.0001240322,0.0015052933,0.00094817433,0.0010424894,0.000091184615,0.000326805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053240466,0.000077980025,0.000034777157,0.00037220377,0.00021310356,0.0019313548,0.00013384376,0.00029992932,0.0000573806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015637405,0.0007407811,0.029451467,0.00031441226,0.00005139239,0.0000048144907,0.20230898,0.000049695296,0.0001777598,0.2102088,0.01669697,0.53983855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004445534,0.000041612097,0.685982,0.00009534337,0.0004741401,4.272871e-7,0.011924875,0.0002963159,0.00007688748,0.002307267,0.2981317,0.00022489819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049416027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030591716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74529546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112291105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053253927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604092280","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4806","title":"FOREWORD BY GUEST EDITOR: INDIGENOUS LAW, LANDS, AND LITERATURE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.01924456307684295,"score_gpt":0.3286395495800958,"score_spread":0.3093949865032528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604092280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5004315,0.006517816,0.00005230337,0.011620382,0.015913485,0.0017734439,0.0008264016,0.00025839164,0.4626063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700098,0.0008229951,0.00037796577,0.0016235814,0.015347422,0.000025754971,0.000020555102,0.000025503556,0.011746396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989024,0.000044682984,0.00014335946,0.00023739442,0.00036845513,0.0003037378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990937,0.00006644095,0.0001554217,0.00033638085,0.00015645224,0.00019158013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003130516,0.00012234498,0.00018482746,0.0000088597035,0.0013637695,0.00068284036,0.00092228234,0.00026108517,0.00005321354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020369308,0.00010724306,0.000052851454,0.00008315702,0.00041471736,0.00082724623,0.00020155961,0.00020860879,0.000018198538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082986866,0.00014921512,0.009706851,0.00035742854,0.000088600515,0.000019703046,0.1412318,0.0000023696684,0.00057613535,0.02143515,0.82465285,0.0016969237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032186965,0.000057382327,0.0039033864,0.00017026218,0.000112297574,0.0000012095613,0.0032589657,0.0000014625192,0.00049617013,0.00078780827,0.99064964,0.00023953899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013709704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010730196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46957836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027332044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065430024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604349924","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4814","title":"ALWAYS COMING HOME: METIS LEGAL UNDERSTANDINGS OF COMMUNITY AND TERRITORY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Metis; Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.07419447407246947,"score_gpt":0.37353256359121134,"score_spread":0.29933808951874186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604349924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8399155,0.00008921572,0.000082910476,0.0008495894,0.0006034903,0.0003162268,0.000013592134,0.00001736954,0.1581121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969627,0.00041490176,0.00032329385,0.000063554624,0.00035475337,0.0000013842381,0.0000015934457,0.000010929655,0.0018668429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885535,0.00021872176,0.00024302465,0.00011503988,0.00029766513,0.0002701851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987,0.00026730887,0.000308485,0.0004017661,0.00015781129,0.00016458784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011628155,0.00009202282,0.0002327837,0.000119166914,0.0059602037,0.00019021862,0.0008481103,0.00010281753,0.00005164603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056368695,0.000087016655,0.000035426783,0.00006830446,0.00079307606,0.0006714634,0.00002545142,0.00019929218,0.0000043222417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110074834,0.00026184006,0.012594748,0.001050596,0.000074875476,0.0000033265583,0.7486902,0.000006077664,0.00020313516,0.2342542,0.0014276289,0.0013232864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013931295,0.0004464138,0.34109998,0.00072247157,0.0005740593,0.0000047983676,0.11915276,0.000018164548,0.0041726828,0.006779599,0.5248594,0.00077654875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28923988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32863164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62953746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010526974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016942059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605232142","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4807","title":"OUTSIDER EDUCATION: INDIGENOUS LAW AND LAND-BASED LEARNING","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Political science; Indigenous education; Humanities; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Ethnology; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07382627404369328,"score_gpt":0.43296131928994275,"score_spread":0.35913504524624945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605232142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23261178,0.000095898045,0.00017744918,0.04033698,0.0011107774,0.0004457507,0.0000046630284,0.000057431276,0.7251593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902824,0.000012576988,0.0010301366,0.003888795,0.0004839319,0.000021865526,0.0000031564327,0.000009541212,0.0042676036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923265,0.000073530806,0.00015364384,0.00015272976,0.00022609343,0.00016136571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893165,0.00016705299,0.00023072587,0.00025043596,0.00029864573,0.00012147178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004708562,0.00006781798,0.000100874415,0.000083385225,0.0014226064,0.0008251603,0.0004189931,0.00006483132,0.0002734488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015334334,0.000071707305,0.000019034418,0.00011945345,0.00020160039,0.0010871233,0.0000633276,0.00020574132,0.000059188125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017969613,0.00094078894,0.41441935,0.0004888664,0.00010467296,0.000006625017,0.11869376,0.00045888152,0.00040246372,0.37924305,0.018500553,0.06656129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024133813,0.000038237624,0.108918205,0.00007086382,0.000104689,7.857842e-7,0.003395925,0.000016100097,0.0002638957,0.0006587047,0.88609535,0.0001959352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020075945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002908835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8675948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003510858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011714105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605377410","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4377","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 247 SO LONG AS YOU HAVE YOUR HEALTH: HEALTH CARE DISTRIBUTION IN CANADA AND PROCEDURALIST HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Right to health; Health care; Political science; Accountability; Scrutiny; Health policy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.061469129960931956,"score_gpt":0.3651926480706275,"score_spread":0.30372351810969556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605377410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9478807,0.0015637416,0.00007067657,0.043472216,0.0009867363,0.0014510179,0.00015595544,0.00007255105,0.0043464247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96309376,0.000028896082,0.00002543941,0.034765474,0.0016240121,0.000051595707,0.00027762225,0.000034145116,0.00009906735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641615,0.00009153359,0.0010490498,0.0004954797,0.00042609373,0.0015217086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981435,0.000085877145,0.0007753117,0.000382563,0.0002903389,0.00032241896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093639706,0.00035970382,0.00076505105,0.00026732098,0.0006861626,0.00033127845,0.00073740206,0.00013744636,0.00019190199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032393375,0.00033761084,0.000053541673,0.0005213911,0.00010674425,0.002406043,0.0006185146,0.00034236597,0.00003907515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013608823,0.00021682837,0.41947126,0.009301149,0.00005221929,0.000013735771,0.0013258043,0.00070636783,0.0000046213245,0.013819829,0.5519831,0.0029689716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006256877,0.000043912685,0.6538789,0.0002782816,0.00005582451,0.0000056708545,0.0016348123,0.00014527915,0.0000060061657,0.00010634633,0.34285185,0.00036741688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98318183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88247365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23440766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009479572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010363841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605740735","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4534","title":"La Réparation Individuelle en Application des Mécanismes Prévus par le Droit International Humanitaire","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Humanities; Political science; Compensation (psychology); International law; Ethnology; Normative; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01989668298460712,"score_gpt":0.33250628830877893,"score_spread":0.3126096053241718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605740735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8055669,0.00007445545,0.005019112,0.0027158505,0.00017735365,0.00048377295,0.00002283077,0.00009300806,0.1858467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980079,0.000055525717,0.00085482735,0.000398986,0.0002628415,0.000013775235,0.000023545295,0.000007073244,0.00037556165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989447,0.00009554389,0.00019745447,0.00019443067,0.00037958313,0.00018831667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941665,0.00008344748,0.00011012374,0.00013954403,0.00016168503,0.000088579465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004154555,0.0000882942,0.00011928961,0.00009821744,0.00027096385,0.00017359393,0.00063894887,0.000114559676,0.000041903888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019678424,0.00010389116,0.000042801294,0.00020809176,0.00013306476,0.0006218507,0.00006481007,0.000107583226,0.000039033024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016522623,0.000925902,0.018266335,0.00014587428,0.00010631952,0.000013816089,0.079420865,0.0027541486,0.004185963,0.7924589,0.00831546,0.09324118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014531522,0.00039997185,0.64595395,0.0002533037,0.0003819332,0.00000631454,0.027695145,0.0028639967,0.002402949,0.14423981,0.17328715,0.0010623415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015541832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023642315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6482191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010558341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014492242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42365584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605920309","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4375","title":"WARMING UP THE “CHILLING EFFECT”: A COMMENT ON THE MOTIVE CLAUSE DISCUSSIONS IN R V KHAWAJA (2010) AND R V KHAWAJA (2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Racial profiling; Terrorism; Constitutionality; Law; Declaration; Political science; Dignity; Enforcement; Suspect; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05492174816345212,"score_gpt":0.3292921061895553,"score_spread":0.27437035802610316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605920309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8742484,0.00094002613,0.003413344,0.06879915,0.0043918784,0.0039335815,0.00004408699,0.00012372661,0.044105846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953353,0.00010438875,0.000067271634,0.002215082,0.0007147342,0.00006559982,0.0000013228473,0.000020507068,0.0014758171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789435,0.0005421541,0.0002734914,0.00024037813,0.00048413785,0.0005654893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973134,0.001898485,0.0001390659,0.00037859564,0.000055949084,0.00021455351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019227472,0.00018266881,0.0002516408,0.000101860525,0.00081525557,0.00015396146,0.00073012407,0.00011019269,0.00017406634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056362234,0.0000911579,0.000069395246,0.0002569669,0.0020033347,0.00055782916,0.00025685117,0.0003461195,0.000051480358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027317207,0.0004955807,0.033345047,0.00016202517,0.00013217548,0.0000069925627,0.17396052,0.00021292207,0.000351928,0.76062113,0.019854037,0.010584473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005282335,0.0010319558,0.19547029,0.0025753682,0.001974672,0.000008861575,0.11428959,0.0007428249,0.0065017627,0.008364309,0.6612669,0.0024911317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009947758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045969334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7522568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008348759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004885162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73813707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606278834","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4856","title":"BUSINESS DOMINANCE IN THE “PEOPLE’S COURT”: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY IN THE TORONTO SMALL CLAIMS COURT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plaintiff; Dominance (genetics); Humanities; Political science; Management; Law; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.08276705721119029,"score_gpt":0.32905351928698584,"score_spread":0.24628646207579555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606278834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661229,0.00018005002,0.0010994503,0.0031293277,0.0007995893,0.0008608581,0.0000953398,0.000008112763,0.027704358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856764,0.0001811446,0.00019041983,0.00046346287,0.00042282225,0.000096042706,0.000005174692,0.000026908468,0.00004638482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979074,0.0001156815,0.0009499072,0.00051098334,0.00012581464,0.00039022998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706066,0.00027304067,0.0011093619,0.0013444672,0.000146597,0.00006587852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026085877,0.00021170081,0.0008619594,0.0001334115,0.00020009394,0.00035484656,0.0024529488,0.00017233078,0.00006308599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032032235,0.00019575746,0.00008884765,0.00026952152,0.00020909998,0.0011584657,0.00023821101,0.0002190989,0.000016109385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029985927,0.0011302031,0.95884806,0.00051271555,0.000048818114,0.000014882604,0.0055889287,0.001593502,0.000075895776,0.02959115,0.0010279039,0.001268109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008835559,0.00007393231,0.9925652,0.0000965017,0.000029935172,0.0000027230847,0.00075111707,0.0016462072,0.000022469938,0.001705207,0.001972828,0.0002503041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043281756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06354921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033717185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021839977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015154782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606282477","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4554","title":"William A. Schabas, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal court; Law; Statute; Political science; Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; Criminal procedure; Philosophy; International law","score_opus":0.056709816511820436,"score_gpt":0.34749403647779126,"score_spread":0.2907842199659708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606282477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89953136,0.000012270691,0.0008992139,0.039314084,0.0030743703,0.00042365323,0.000022557539,0.00006264606,0.05665982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759,0.0000081453845,0.00082746585,0.0018445493,0.007899275,0.000019404448,0.000009591919,0.0000117914415,0.0134797925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985539,0.00006139654,0.00019950625,0.00024257916,0.00074736454,0.00019527145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990708,0.00005972106,0.00008061349,0.00020832905,0.0004449854,0.000135529],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041263274,0.000087977176,0.00010197212,0.00013288097,0.00052496046,0.00012691939,0.0010981223,0.00004643582,0.00099587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022022912,0.000070292386,0.00004338581,0.000105776926,0.00016448539,0.0006146054,0.00010892545,0.00011443354,0.00023163205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019420862,0.00018129585,0.0006507432,0.000016285294,0.000047711543,0.000011443319,0.01707481,0.00094472314,0.00046987634,0.87412244,0.105540305,0.0007461556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018989421,0.00013083548,0.033163577,0.000024503577,0.00008375196,0.000008076905,0.0008319006,0.00007835038,0.0012773175,0.0021435367,0.9618636,0.00020470604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082911295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014200086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8719789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099948295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015427337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606760109","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4552","title":"Janet E. Halley, Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Cliché; Adversary; Sentence; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.12226781706251012,"score_gpt":0.3483944986057968,"score_spread":0.2261266815432867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606760109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76950985,0.002309536,0.0009587643,0.035906393,0.0011515974,0.001057956,0.00014205561,0.00012873593,0.18883508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98687756,0.0004574646,0.0038174284,0.003279588,0.00043779114,0.000036964455,0.000004247319,0.000017366685,0.005071564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983507,0.00012746901,0.00025180282,0.0004528135,0.00043372184,0.00038351625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981865,0.0009390326,0.000105428444,0.00031985872,0.00014722614,0.00030193033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038000697,0.00017566814,0.0003663172,0.00013288377,0.00064977806,0.000092716604,0.00064682245,0.00016821212,0.00016365126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011185699,0.00017289043,0.000055204426,0.00030862208,0.00044788036,0.00023716869,0.00038610218,0.00014342033,0.00010022905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083189126,0.00047073964,0.064656876,0.00016719989,0.0004925134,0.0004306971,0.28893492,0.00007936392,0.0005961519,0.015623013,0.60640204,0.021314621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010197347,0.00036451218,0.46121845,0.00029759205,0.00038495797,0.000022550767,0.032775663,0.000013998097,0.00042501418,0.003582288,0.49908268,0.00081253384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027090837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020695475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3965616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033457185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013877812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70502675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607043875","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4559","title":"Antony Anghie, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; International law; Law; Political science; Politics; Globalization; Colonialism; Perspective (graphical); Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.029131074050017542,"score_gpt":0.34798133546881066,"score_spread":0.31885026141879313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607043875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18727374,0.0000621072,0.00006170371,0.005119744,0.00055767293,0.00026620805,0.000023562137,0.000018946068,0.8066163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567443,0.000012312255,0.00019401124,0.0022051008,0.0005586434,0.0000027057742,0.0000015662496,0.0000042711176,0.0013469436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909073,0.000060491748,0.00020597898,0.00012360563,0.00039620989,0.000122992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942726,0.000110778725,0.00013520395,0.00010412448,0.00019424902,0.00002839905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041134926,0.00006601843,0.00013831399,0.0000561368,0.00018026207,0.000119711665,0.00055104936,0.00004514402,0.00052521203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001064841,0.000048203732,0.00004672396,0.00005116819,0.00035928667,0.00031735594,0.00007167392,0.00006282216,0.000005703556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015152783,0.000022505235,0.000046250647,0.000008435427,0.000018082663,0.00000124549,0.0032325834,0.000013426079,0.00010387679,0.99578,0.0004164574,0.00020560434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033073332,0.00018713588,0.02415472,0.00037458565,0.00033556213,0.000004997178,0.0015394875,0.00023190845,0.0031570836,0.81968635,0.14653647,0.0004843456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005762941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002861251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8084007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024883571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049039325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5750703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607265275","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4558","title":"Laverne A. Jacobs & Justice Anne L. Mactavish, eds., Dialogue Between Court And Tribunals – Essays In Administrative Law And Justice (2001- 2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Administration of justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Administration (probate law); Administrative law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10415412601389791,"score_gpt":0.40192674316524135,"score_spread":0.29777261715134345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607265275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7334242,0.0040961606,0.0008972604,0.022483813,0.001244314,0.0023121308,0.00051340525,0.00019686125,0.23483188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99332404,0.0009152888,0.00112044,0.002151572,0.0011007115,0.00001581709,0.000017998087,0.00002220328,0.0013319133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706954,0.00024349794,0.0005978926,0.0006214558,0.0006878489,0.000779787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971386,0.001393113,0.000263707,0.00031138823,0.00030753785,0.000585612],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015958309,0.0003134966,0.0006168683,0.000177678,0.00046548084,0.00032311978,0.0006574284,0.00025626668,0.00020490456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017483146,0.00033063116,0.0000555227,0.00052986987,0.00057962036,0.0010770682,0.0001727088,0.00037132186,0.00004651871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006371026,0.0033674329,0.04670659,0.009597101,0.0005599277,0.0010156534,0.1078834,0.00083715166,0.006466809,0.49310067,0.27403817,0.05005605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050674416,0.0024754251,0.32934427,0.0027757217,0.009740591,0.000045286775,0.024347788,0.00016603147,0.0020432116,0.018849472,0.60157275,0.0035719902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048773848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005521072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4742512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009429806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002668218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607326201","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4556","title":"Gavin Drewry, Louis Blom-Cooper, Charles Blake, The Court of Appeal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Restructuring; Law; Legislation; Economic Justice; Political science; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Sociology; History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09751438710130468,"score_gpt":0.38737287996961767,"score_spread":0.289858492868313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607326201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46385866,0.00045829162,0.00039878004,0.08741265,0.0015769342,0.0010360443,0.000050974224,0.000091771515,0.4451159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99145675,0.00018860756,0.00038769923,0.001796373,0.00057987886,0.000022380722,0.0000039180627,0.000013634169,0.0055507314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854314,0.00015430836,0.0003524439,0.00017679509,0.0005366055,0.00023669994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829394,0.00046881393,0.00027035412,0.00030640577,0.00055457896,0.000105885294],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007349384,0.00010077661,0.00017660344,0.00012537865,0.00047853176,0.000109000466,0.00080477475,0.00008072442,0.0010927764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014388267,0.00008305276,0.000055504035,0.0008545026,0.00045825233,0.00066466513,0.000094178686,0.00024539395,0.00013673583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034234163,0.001718363,0.025895206,0.00036321324,0.0003137319,0.000017513501,0.21207838,0.0006171394,0.0045991195,0.16212903,0.57873976,0.013186197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003414087,0.00007700977,0.041297562,0.00007291264,0.00023727136,0.0000050901212,0.01099372,0.00003281971,0.0022429384,0.00022872417,0.944219,0.00025152985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005215764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066468125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5275981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033726716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089545484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607339964","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4496","title":"William Twining, General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.10031398651527838,"score_gpt":0.42151995407424686,"score_spread":0.32120596755896846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607339964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40688866,0.000101785576,0.000968861,0.0020825749,0.0011126,0.00021593961,0.00006553527,0.000046845715,0.5885172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963426,0.000016317195,0.0010086437,0.0006814518,0.0011962246,0.000011317611,0.0000019173683,0.0000073979895,0.00073412235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870074,0.000057426023,0.00018962884,0.00028207962,0.00052331644,0.00024679798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911654,0.00019083731,0.00010872979,0.00014740408,0.00030929755,0.00012718151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020936748,0.00012027035,0.00019836478,0.00004292183,0.00040252873,0.00018067802,0.0006046535,0.00007132186,0.00054849114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028619342,0.0001188362,0.00007086165,0.00023704382,0.00041933623,0.0004960015,0.00019675797,0.00016663491,0.00006273373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042971515,0.000043948854,0.0069144187,0.0000041437324,0.00006523449,0.0000031166535,0.007600224,0.000026545853,0.00051305117,0.9804565,0.004284079,0.00004579119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014337857,0.00032198196,0.17645448,0.00026770524,0.0006151577,0.000002015611,0.06801374,0.00025384637,0.0029447528,0.2559626,0.49250698,0.0012229253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023630522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032475885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72449386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031069497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001512467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607397021","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4551","title":"Oren Ben-Dor, Thinking About Law: In Silence with Heidegger","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Relation (database); Economic Justice; Socratic method; Hebrew; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03537546077903161,"score_gpt":0.3137322866426292,"score_spread":0.2783568258635976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607397021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65909207,0.0004118471,0.000059820886,0.0017229973,0.00024110633,0.0004613934,0.00000861516,0.00008674405,0.33791542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926552,0.0002989049,0.0015591036,0.002270853,0.00038479356,0.000025024681,0.0000021122942,0.000018026964,0.002785963],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983131,0.000087287655,0.00023210909,0.0002916743,0.00068342785,0.00039236635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992171,0.00013873675,0.00011455444,0.00022669153,0.0001648965,0.00013805744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039399814,0.0001387536,0.00023298127,0.00002035865,0.0005142284,0.000093802686,0.00084143213,0.00015426683,0.00027406344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011982192,0.00011631603,0.0000572449,0.00052685227,0.00050583604,0.00069699285,0.00012828481,0.000246004,0.00003843133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003513106,0.00056763197,0.074740425,0.0004527462,0.00013723911,0.0002344611,0.65031683,0.0026850745,0.00081243407,0.2426327,0.02533936,0.0017297764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045899134,0.0006899352,0.34879807,0.003234785,0.00070961076,0.000035852765,0.15996155,0.000104631945,0.0077729905,0.011295353,0.4595952,0.0032121043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044979975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002861759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49035528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007213032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019437337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6799657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607470646","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4557","title":"Nudge...Fat...Drugs: Permit but Discourage – The Regulation of Excessive Consumption","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Betrayal; Happiness; Consumption (sociology); Political science; Multitude; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.057341076543650615,"score_gpt":0.38025577644271913,"score_spread":0.3229146998990685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607470646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97356874,0.00029287572,0.00038678746,0.0021258031,0.00059859187,0.0005700439,0.000038901893,0.000086026936,0.02233226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447966,0.00001463108,0.00013723092,0.00069913233,0.00020449054,0.00003391891,0.000014153099,0.000020492069,0.004396269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983701,0.00014396435,0.0005022578,0.0003668759,0.00031591137,0.00030088352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983551,0.00021763123,0.00039038886,0.0007939217,0.00017322629,0.00006976051],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029353923,0.0001875654,0.00032567212,0.00022237004,0.00009495165,0.000035375226,0.00078368955,0.00022514637,0.0009585741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011766506,0.00015193761,0.00008223841,0.0002892756,0.00026645765,0.00022336048,0.000106309315,0.00023411357,0.00011127427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026221366,0.0035732016,0.08193476,0.000719686,0.00056019373,0.0000859439,0.044434663,0.00037255383,0.24299242,0.31350696,0.042839352,0.26635814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012516382,0.00041767766,0.9698717,0.000086800996,0.0006619127,0.000020938167,0.005547739,0.00005126618,0.015113235,0.002257223,0.0043643657,0.0003555029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023058796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026658954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88793695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003613589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030865398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610167096","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4888","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF THE SOUTH: INDIGENOUS WATER RIGHTS IN CHILE - ANOTHER STEP IN THE “CIVILIZING MISSION?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Centro de Recursos Hídricos para la Agricultura y la Minería; Universidad de Concepción; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Colonialism; Realm; Law; Scholarship; International law; Human rights; Subject (documents); Indigenous rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.10371930265903341,"score_gpt":0.38210742238380613,"score_spread":0.27838811972477273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610167096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8220252,0.000612462,0.000030719766,0.006238244,0.0004036201,0.00077669206,0.000017837301,0.000008719328,0.16988651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995109,0.000037494563,0.000049071466,0.000120427016,0.00014833864,0.00001817441,3.0782e-7,0.000002431,0.00011287058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851245,0.00021965863,0.00026569696,0.00020162233,0.0005375877,0.00026300253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907386,0.00024640615,0.00016422039,0.0003569575,0.00012731823,0.000031219435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008245661,0.000108388995,0.00021010723,0.0000810543,0.00088919565,0.0000809702,0.0014717154,0.000060510713,0.000089923844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039755172,0.000059599148,0.000056677287,0.000110764326,0.0019984485,0.00032657152,0.00030543975,0.00016373109,0.000017820166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015030437,0.00045667557,0.1560912,0.0001803661,0.00007625946,0.000023828503,0.32711866,0.0007355549,0.00082542846,0.51263624,0.0004938901,0.0012115921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060572306,0.000036491303,0.9516612,0.00074154866,0.00006755469,0.000001625792,0.013330685,0.000010562167,0.0019777499,0.0031315163,0.028193256,0.00024203965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031427303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01533742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7955701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057357644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023408003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.855864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610885289","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4885","title":"PRAXIS AND THE INTERNATIONAL (HUMAN RIGHTS) LAW SCHOLAR: TOWARD THE INTENSIFICATION OF TWAILIAN DRAMATURGY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Human rights; Politics; Subaltern; Normative; Sociology; Context (archaeology); International law; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052800938702867395,"score_gpt":0.36718411928522443,"score_spread":0.31438318058235704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610885289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43366948,0.000113452035,0.000079837955,0.0463128,0.00076618406,0.00063998427,0.000021644553,0.000025929176,0.5183707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985849,0.00000886631,0.0001470664,0.00045604844,0.00027342196,0.000011297597,0.0000014509611,0.000005613765,0.0005113052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990335,0.00008848453,0.00020903863,0.00014914802,0.0003659356,0.00015387767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987525,0.0001597626,0.00026997685,0.00042789517,0.0003215751,0.00006830901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010624061,0.000073102274,0.00013578244,0.00005521725,0.0012304247,0.00045744714,0.001457435,0.000062330866,0.000064805565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051333295,0.000045226116,0.000063754414,0.00007087866,0.0017085581,0.0004524891,0.00026023484,0.00017131332,0.000007361187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008500631,0.000038196707,0.0021288646,0.000040679388,0.00007609675,8.629197e-7,0.040230475,0.0000033310462,0.00012238522,0.95417345,0.0019844107,0.0011162753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002421111,0.00012693871,0.19420947,0.00037888394,0.0006766422,0.000002855784,0.05934822,0.00021662426,0.0032609082,0.13657372,0.60224605,0.00053859764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014490884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021295238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8175997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014641783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035478126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611587239","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4887","title":"LEGAL SCHOLACTIVISTS IN THE THIRD WORLD: BETWEEN AMBITION, ALTRUISM AND ACCESS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subaltern; Situated; Third world; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Law; History; Economic history","score_opus":0.07499485072966822,"score_gpt":0.4058455047294704,"score_spread":0.3308506539998022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611587239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65375715,0.000107196545,0.000012978207,0.023408087,0.0002513797,0.00038472202,0.000014641045,0.000019086516,0.32204476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587405,0.000084060746,0.00003627975,0.0013532183,0.0009198427,0.000022425438,8.1014826e-7,0.00000869582,0.001700612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871314,0.00013479251,0.000206502,0.00020826803,0.00040897683,0.0003282975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895734,0.00031917015,0.00018385504,0.0003475866,0.0000934412,0.0000985869],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008530306,0.00011579829,0.0002229429,0.00012177817,0.0012850846,0.001588602,0.0015730227,0.00005858488,0.000037202964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006181499,0.0000898105,0.000038786115,0.00023712308,0.00044053688,0.0016712553,0.0004651692,0.00023338328,0.000015840345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012849786,0.00015693251,0.777828,0.00025991365,0.00010387694,0.00002684998,0.05799988,0.000021354614,0.000064995234,0.100069545,0.050896827,0.012443361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019110083,0.000020327518,0.7905083,0.000059963342,0.000059938095,2.4616565e-7,0.0012446512,0.0000011453816,0.0000722397,0.00076094264,0.20696457,0.00011659986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050256114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02426097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34211692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004131667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008802828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618196792","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5006","title":"COLD, HARD JUSTICE LESSONS FROM THE FLEET: INNOVATING FROM THE BOTTOM UP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incubator; Popularity; Economic Justice; Legal service; Mentorship; Service (business); Legal research; Legal profession; Entrepreneurship; Legal practice; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.17588333222656177,"score_gpt":0.448297613723316,"score_spread":0.27241428149675423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618196792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2924126,0.00022018998,0.000779987,0.5595811,0.0066057052,0.0009608129,0.0003358611,0.000103695835,0.13900004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752951,0.000053889355,0.0020791006,0.014273844,0.003604857,0.00005560531,0.000018478444,0.000027443411,0.0045916764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792564,0.00029557516,0.00042572568,0.00034018283,0.00066727854,0.00034561692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392056,0.0034733166,0.00070809235,0.0011184879,0.0006672058,0.000112334325],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001483962,0.00016177108,0.00020980576,0.000050414183,0.0036514895,0.0021799207,0.0029277252,0.00013414343,0.0010198781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01258981,0.00011671393,0.00006206765,0.00052838266,0.00046897808,0.0016982463,0.00038085313,0.0006977791,0.00029083336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001732367,0.0002565724,0.029975835,0.000054983724,0.00031538733,0.000005981302,0.1099393,0.00007101075,0.0042447806,0.3159713,0.51547194,0.023519706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037313625,0.000016483853,0.2052713,0.00013733181,0.00065574626,2.425595e-7,0.024548661,0.00006130259,0.0006814222,0.001603484,0.76638114,0.0002697317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07466863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067841657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6828825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007450403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001022563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W272099124","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4616","title":"Figuring Reconciliation: Dancing With the Enemy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Dance; Politics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Literature; Law; History; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08357554898578719,"score_gpt":0.29594466241741274,"score_spread":0.21236911343162557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W272099124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17450503,0.00069627824,0.0020701888,0.0031588664,0.00037956308,0.00032852945,0.0000056609983,0.00007626278,0.81877965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881858,0.000024811336,0.00023142042,0.0008913333,0.00059866474,0.000015094609,0.0000010372846,0.0000116656765,0.010040179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993376,0.000018373114,0.00018692111,0.000110004075,0.00019671995,0.00015036183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990973,0.00025356334,0.000117667274,0.00029924975,0.000197087,0.000035127396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003410478,0.00008433519,0.00012025904,0.000052872885,0.00035369734,0.00010506908,0.00042094899,0.000016141052,0.00028018592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041665564,0.000054377,0.000026947366,0.000069371825,0.000107958076,0.00023308554,0.00012372139,0.00009274171,0.000041673782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077984674,0.00030291406,0.0077427276,0.00069971534,0.00066262786,0.00001618454,0.39208597,0.0011589634,0.00068225095,0.43685958,0.09083639,0.06817282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029923985,0.00009465382,0.015210633,0.00012708912,0.0001688061,0.0000017129306,0.027306302,0.000024979912,0.001211343,0.00011578554,0.95522314,0.0002163161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014443728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006246513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86438674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026723503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025263698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30678394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737184433","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5009","title":"A THIRD REVOLUTION IN FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTION: ACCESSIBLE LEGAL PROFESSIONALISM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Law; Dispute resolution; Political science; Doctrine; Alternative dispute resolution; Practice of law; Sociology; Legal practice; Service (business); Legal profession; Business","score_opus":0.09713719114710222,"score_gpt":0.4104399470507432,"score_spread":0.313302755903641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737184433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59883845,0.00041493517,0.00052087574,0.014113432,0.0020410714,0.00089788553,0.000019752313,0.000092284085,0.38306135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916076,0.00013330801,0.0004136572,0.00040772025,0.0007372873,0.00004462279,0.0000034267364,0.000014000288,0.0066383923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815786,0.00013995018,0.00036802646,0.00032560815,0.00062714354,0.00038141303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987435,0.00008575219,0.00032296826,0.00050131103,0.00021264896,0.00013387082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010258135,0.00012923205,0.0002394744,0.00018962771,0.0010169388,0.00040927835,0.0011532203,0.00016710759,0.00010125131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005829057,0.00013019513,0.0000713517,0.00024778792,0.00025038968,0.0019665945,0.000377557,0.00022551451,0.000044754423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026643707,0.0017387313,0.19894674,0.0013534813,0.00018297715,0.00019947697,0.04907245,0.0010825972,0.012259089,0.5435824,0.11005931,0.078858405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005309018,0.00004830066,0.7197284,0.00043746686,0.00006201098,6.180001e-7,0.0009079624,0.00020728454,0.00013730566,0.00080516876,0.27691463,0.000219936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014961568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003947763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5427772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014020082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000378287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771611331","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5012","title":"ENHANCING THE LEGAL PROFESSION’S CAPACITY FOR INNOVATION: THE PROMISE OF REFLECTIVE PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH FOR INCREASING ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Enabling; Economic Justice; Sociology; Public relations; Action (physics); Action research; Legal profession; Reflective practice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.38929909219707365,"score_gpt":0.5793227361091744,"score_spread":0.19002364391210075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771611331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5501914,0.00003399226,0.008320116,0.3889066,0.0019564815,0.0073282607,0.000048839956,0.000037097358,0.043177236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859534,0.000017521892,0.008390393,0.00227399,0.0012350554,0.0007440899,0.0000032057194,0.000020855883,0.0013614988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975153,0.0006918592,0.00048571842,0.0003180594,0.0006427413,0.00034628154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98564607,0.007853247,0.00082432374,0.0005391753,0.0050482103,0.0000889773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011030297,0.0001186663,0.00018970252,0.00026181148,0.0043957,0.0014710539,0.0012580036,0.00011564795,0.00002435169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09919323,0.00008664851,0.000034396267,0.0010931448,0.00041987255,0.004469878,0.00032852494,0.0004967735,0.000003320246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007868199,0.00091479725,0.0013013055,0.0027266762,0.000331345,0.0000012334409,0.19199252,0.00013914822,0.068169855,0.6192103,0.06717081,0.040173788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011745531,0.00043781902,0.033160936,0.0006458924,0.0010353308,0.000005630073,0.12728254,0.00014055164,0.049293693,0.00564379,0.7807324,0.0004468713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009516326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034788402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7135616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016711978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016044573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773616646","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.4999","title":"BUILDING BETTER LAW: HOW DESIGN THINKING CAN HELP US BE BETTER LAWYERS, MEET NEW CHALLENGES, AND CREATE THE FUTURE OF LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; J.W. McConnell Family Foundation","keywords":"Mindset; Variety (cybernetics); Design thinking; Relevance (law); Law; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Engineering ethics; Practice of law; Legal profession; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08205352888496954,"score_gpt":0.2842031446469419,"score_spread":0.20214961576197238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773616646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10956097,0.01615303,0.17099798,0.55214345,0.0046949494,0.003593773,0.000058532263,0.00046526376,0.14233205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94746214,0.00047948747,0.03561903,0.01455354,0.0013746687,0.000010205298,7.802909e-7,0.00004444423,0.0004556741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820375,0.00013883217,0.00026404753,0.0005084363,0.00048473076,0.00040020508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979073,0.0002508434,0.00028089163,0.0012330029,0.00015563052,0.0001723758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057402434,0.0002553165,0.00037274839,0.000065213186,0.000537914,0.00086960645,0.0031976313,0.00013726049,0.000021478107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093492614,0.00017251083,0.00008005618,0.00006806991,0.0003636456,0.0013374682,0.001195032,0.00022633924,0.0000032662263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028799855,0.0001818164,0.00034001516,0.0010252893,0.00054029754,0.00008028418,0.03698802,0.0003021678,0.014768663,0.7792351,0.063458584,0.10279173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004195933,0.0021126647,0.011988335,0.0023160412,0.0014564041,0.00011792287,0.0011931894,0.011012506,0.239831,0.08950786,0.63309795,0.0031701874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013426286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051466754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8379012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026566811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007345039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8385635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774264718","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5011","title":"READING LAW AND IMAGINING JUSTICE IN THE WAHKOHTOWIN CLASSROOM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Injustice; Sociology; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Reading (process); Class (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.09807585211070377,"score_gpt":0.44257968607187576,"score_spread":0.344503833961172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774264718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05346076,0.000038739385,0.00011074615,0.08195611,0.0007652549,0.00031838316,0.0000047293074,0.000022224705,0.86332303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918619,0.00003113832,0.0007672114,0.005803192,0.0005121978,0.000018583833,0.0000011061791,0.000008565338,0.00099615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890596,0.00015504603,0.00022110654,0.00018290759,0.0003088958,0.000226091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846923,0.0007094511,0.0002148608,0.0003743587,0.00015786683,0.000074230746],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015720887,0.00008016891,0.00011867901,0.00009661628,0.0011145088,0.0011626936,0.00090439577,0.000059453654,0.00010478363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033383362,0.0000697891,0.00001963472,0.0002332048,0.00029791714,0.002070215,0.00012524045,0.00031409846,0.000032372638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036505087,0.000092100454,0.006292642,0.00010323297,0.000013772223,0.000007962221,0.06857538,0.000015853482,0.00023707311,0.91369665,0.007487348,0.0034414565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005407029,0.000045541623,0.1004791,0.00020303717,0.00039344368,0.000004427905,0.07479253,0.00013070402,0.00020861278,0.004372808,0.8184804,0.00034871156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015412908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027033023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003702157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023184394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775178260","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.4996","title":"THE STORY OF THE BC FAMILY JUSTICE INNOVATION LAB","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Multitude; Theme (computing); Sociology; Transition (genetics); Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24879320597142035,"score_gpt":0.4436518285030475,"score_spread":0.19485862253162717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775178260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86596394,0.00058265403,0.006632813,0.0034698788,0.0059196446,0.0008881036,0.000037744507,0.000030088891,0.116475165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99100137,0.0000045278566,0.0003453846,0.00046225262,0.00034833545,0.000010893405,1.531431e-7,0.000014911367,0.0078121894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591047,0.00031947237,0.0010478776,0.00039421645,0.0020707424,0.00025720213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99045926,0.0035829856,0.0016269932,0.002646705,0.0016191177,0.00006491895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005601098,0.00015529586,0.00035140812,0.00025474842,0.0015416171,0.0009144593,0.0055127116,0.00008067147,0.0000841704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022637375,0.00008322492,0.00012611247,0.0008828549,0.00031668716,0.0006346111,0.0016072954,0.0002720146,0.00013332117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007174232,0.00021298593,0.022245161,0.0003101438,0.00013215619,0.000011855926,0.0038083026,0.003724325,0.02621859,0.23718627,0.5043721,0.20106065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004795178,0.00006766774,0.7575522,0.00021915043,0.0001626791,0.000003262133,0.003094885,0.0012001774,0.0011855038,0.010633756,0.22518055,0.00022064203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001959832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000103644976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73530704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033014152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020154152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775375763","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5010","title":"COLLABORATIVE POLICY-MAKING, LAW STUDENTS, AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: THE REWARDS OF DESTABILIZING INSTITUTIONAL PATTERNS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Public defender; Law; Public relations; Law and economics; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.09752159562412278,"score_gpt":0.4991703045752187,"score_spread":0.40164870895109595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775375763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.700761,0.00006835144,0.00063939637,0.09024498,0.0012651953,0.0013597542,0.000160193,0.000036797384,0.20546429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944136,0.00004629382,0.0005020968,0.0039658006,0.000619561,0.00005016957,0.000002346787,0.00001096101,0.0003891456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982988,0.00017116602,0.0003450899,0.00024681314,0.00069199497,0.0002461381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975304,0.00050919247,0.00045459592,0.00045998575,0.00090074743,0.00014505176],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010864722,0.0001222319,0.00019298945,0.0001647345,0.0017484743,0.0015323418,0.0017871576,0.00007795484,0.0001448336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060370835,0.000105453575,0.000029550807,0.00056473206,0.00057883526,0.0023068204,0.0006209519,0.00021869954,0.000012366642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019883963,0.00037810527,0.08688786,0.00042049756,0.00012748418,0.0000045909674,0.08027225,0.00039439384,0.00038174287,0.8206417,0.0068617105,0.0034308229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005652948,0.000113642556,0.6424399,0.0004727206,0.0005468391,0.0000021004316,0.03143817,0.000016381957,0.0010279764,0.0015386993,0.32143646,0.00040181482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015966611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.819103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011778664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014760162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775761272","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5008","title":"ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND JUSTICE SYSTEM INTEGRATION: BRITISH COLUMBIA’S CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Proposition; Transformational leadership; Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Mediation; Computer science; Public relations; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.037443886373358194,"score_gpt":0.28219286545571165,"score_spread":0.24474897908235346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775761272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54403055,0.0007675863,0.028021393,0.0073344773,0.0064354846,0.0024724128,0.00045480204,0.0008270624,0.40965626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99332416,0.00006202677,0.00055122335,0.00063882855,0.0023815383,0.000039599363,0.00008622224,0.000037659396,0.0028787507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816775,0.000025885709,0.0005036371,0.00047379226,0.00045239658,0.0003765646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982217,0.000053403495,0.0005861603,0.00057577866,0.00049216714,0.00007081328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004133031,0.00018390857,0.00033710527,0.00017528882,0.0011853126,0.0035287302,0.0006961131,0.00014716489,0.00016266777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066937465,0.00025633821,0.00009414623,0.0002706929,0.00017886277,0.0027802668,0.00056258927,0.00022843476,0.00007737696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011488305,0.002799197,0.025274443,0.015961302,0.00053353136,0.00024324161,0.0003124147,0.0029295469,0.0029393777,0.15046516,0.69233125,0.10506171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020217288,0.00007323806,0.68219763,0.0018809158,0.0023427785,0.00004640148,0.0015772487,0.064523116,0.000020436733,0.00027676355,0.24428892,0.0007507965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019137012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051964726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65692323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011159987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060549795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784823737","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5109","title":"Securing the Future of Copyright Users’ Rights in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Reservation of rights; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Covenant; Balance (ability); Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Public rights; Legislation; Law and economics; Cultural rights; Right to property; Public interest; Sociology","score_opus":0.020950576366696914,"score_gpt":0.23361967145279325,"score_spread":0.21266909508609633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784823737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81577873,0.00014315694,0.000032838732,0.0011984068,0.0011833025,0.00037943487,0.000003996035,0.000019828729,0.18126033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960572,0.0000040282407,0.000040820443,0.0014939423,0.0020403517,0.000006924751,0.0000020311463,0.000014323319,0.00034033798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988182,0.0000128224,0.00035014036,0.0002206233,0.0003324076,0.000265787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911493,0.00007665311,0.00017806658,0.00032381673,0.0002879627,0.000018561797],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019360492,0.00015285145,0.00023591984,0.0001848186,0.000120170516,0.00010141171,0.00086551823,0.000045549557,0.0028776445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072274284,0.00009460283,0.0000418728,0.000629037,0.00008668398,0.0007506645,0.00031101593,0.00014821446,0.000092652335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012520095,0.0002589467,0.024765182,0.0018740871,0.00017404354,0.000042279582,0.0026118935,0.00018318182,0.003990944,0.015262646,0.9409942,0.008590554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009068892,0.000065802764,0.06236825,0.0004656344,0.00025663362,0.0000018873634,0.0011072424,0.0092556495,0.020851746,0.0017949786,0.90234,0.0005852771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6744791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8371293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18091999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007255997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017077345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787958489","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5025","title":"PRIORITIZING CHILDREN’S BEST INTERESTS IN CANADIAN YOUTH JUSTICE: ARTICLE 3 OF THE UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD AND CHILD-FRIENDLY ALTERNATIVES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Punitive damages; Economic Justice; Mirroring; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Convention; Declaration; Child protection; Sociology; Duty; Juvenile delinquency; Criminology","score_opus":0.03251033438924564,"score_gpt":0.3422734066505872,"score_spread":0.3097630722613416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787958489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97410125,0.00026616812,0.000003073479,0.0064471606,0.0003607283,0.00071340916,0.00006193467,0.0000045165284,0.018041756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841887,0.000041899497,0.0000328468,0.0009960852,0.0004114246,0.0000055698206,0.0000015387711,0.00001419157,0.00007759447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862033,0.00015145795,0.00039752678,0.00021523931,0.00035785013,0.00025759236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987741,0.00016931696,0.00022239063,0.00046342963,0.00022497056,0.00014576882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005348186,0.00012708866,0.00022862283,0.00012751785,0.00022167385,0.000024019826,0.00046402458,0.00010037638,0.000032007192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076005125,0.00007035702,0.00006077464,0.00036014433,0.00038161897,0.0000878168,0.00017258429,0.0005021623,0.000003660313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011370896,0.0012528386,0.72574335,0.00414763,0.0004846812,0.000023978637,0.13738243,0.000088368004,0.0014902424,0.12301998,0.0005122108,0.004717226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010060166,0.00051008095,0.9735022,0.0031327226,0.00065294426,0.000015300604,0.003020255,0.00013691063,0.01668412,0.0003697224,0.00082276773,0.00014691458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07352212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049692336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24775891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006076802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017718639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788576041","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5023","title":"ANTICIPATING AND MANAGING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL COST OF CIVIL LITIGATION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Public relations; State (computer science); Social psychology; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.17421081707730832,"score_gpt":0.5146753510708778,"score_spread":0.34046453399356946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788576041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428641,0.000047741687,0.0008396026,0.009635816,0.00036059567,0.000704198,0.0000053579374,0.000024319908,0.045518234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953096,0.000020545323,0.0006054416,0.00326159,0.00057505595,0.000037260146,0.0000012176232,0.000009145414,0.00018017353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849415,0.00033579423,0.0004592961,0.00020153835,0.0002592593,0.00024997248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731654,0.0017493578,0.00027862255,0.000301283,0.00024527035,0.00010892337],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013064761,0.00008335023,0.00020954726,0.000058872123,0.000248392,0.000014311302,0.00029721385,0.00009868563,0.0013161271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028031892,0.00005591272,0.000022454951,0.00021105114,0.00029039977,0.00019419957,0.00023631341,0.00030383677,0.000068474714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019448248,0.0010612163,0.6502459,0.011778237,0.0002329965,0.000016193804,0.103030965,0.000046453977,0.012322153,0.039874945,0.062017728,0.11742839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013466978,0.0008871835,0.9140894,0.002263166,0.0005558114,0.0000027929902,0.021229785,0.002085967,0.001464341,0.0037006682,0.052046724,0.00032748524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023277297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009615073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26384348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012797721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037730864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788672079","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5019","title":"THE INACCESSIBILITY OF JUSTICE FOR MIGRANT WORKERS: A CAPABILITIES-BASED PERSPECTIVE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Perspective (graphical); Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Migrant workers; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Empirical research; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05370722291969057,"score_gpt":0.397786856034735,"score_spread":0.3440796331150444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788672079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79800874,0.0002607091,0.0047290423,0.012457252,0.002327324,0.0026635586,0.0002484891,0.000094749754,0.17921016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571645,0.0000040157793,0.0011307669,0.0004682424,0.0007322648,0.00007611735,0.0000018900688,0.00001434043,0.0018559344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983479,0.00014125415,0.0003582079,0.00027776608,0.00054581504,0.0003290949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960643,0.0014859241,0.00021178449,0.0003114258,0.0018253223,0.00010124076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012194798,0.00011906281,0.00020195592,0.000084747626,0.00054316805,0.00011150308,0.0009710682,0.000075950404,0.00014397182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027720958,0.000093096896,0.00011859479,0.00036093628,0.00095511874,0.00029864864,0.00008590216,0.00008302209,0.000010530772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057711476,0.0009265454,0.019619912,0.0011176594,0.0003416024,0.0000023133282,0.07494832,0.0004709101,0.0013743972,0.8668575,0.02619319,0.0023764733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045040185,0.00288359,0.11348486,0.0012272783,0.0030606333,8.353879e-7,0.18985896,0.00207593,0.03264975,0.042642992,0.60605735,0.0015537794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01161001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008960589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8242145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020404803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049450796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99497175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788940108","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5024","title":"THE SILENCING OF QUEER VOICES IN THE LITIGATION OVER TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY’S PROPOSED LAW SCHOOL","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Dissent; Queer theory; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.043494779736410506,"score_gpt":0.32876822792399235,"score_spread":0.2852734481875818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788940108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87783986,0.000069405396,0.000039024344,0.0025358617,0.0001775466,0.00034547137,0.0000067810306,0.000011652148,0.11897437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904567,0.000034753324,0.00002128328,0.00034064538,0.00031346586,0.0000019179704,2.9488422e-7,0.0000021080589,0.00023983231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904674,0.00016794767,0.00014920284,0.000108220214,0.00037731268,0.00015057034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991745,0.00035353488,0.00010687046,0.00010980327,0.00021752888,0.00003777071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006690171,0.0000562357,0.00009907566,0.000039494862,0.00059192406,0.000059468435,0.00053900713,0.00003940885,0.000031622036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035123253,0.00003795452,0.000031716205,0.00033941155,0.0008996225,0.00032763917,0.00010177963,0.00008381119,0.000018717607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044240966,0.00017369716,0.13372222,0.00009743297,0.000091764196,0.0000075392322,0.05181611,0.00006544864,0.0012766578,0.8090071,0.0014422063,0.001857403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069092953,0.00017226291,0.8507352,0.0003345151,0.00022663156,3.9460633e-7,0.056385696,0.000016824557,0.002609973,0.009150338,0.079414986,0.00026226332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029733028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048689697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7998568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053177973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020678095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9767281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789004301","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5020","title":"REDUCING THE “JUSTICE GAP” THROUGH ACCESS TO LEGAL INFORMATION: ESTABLISHING ACCESS TO JUSTICE ENTRY POINTS AT PUBLIC LIBRARIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public access; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intermediary; Public relations; Information access; Scope (computer science); Law; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Internet privacy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13096704119874325,"score_gpt":0.40694695882814635,"score_spread":0.2759799176294031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789004301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076972656,0.000060346567,0.005082103,0.34079134,0.0067318836,0.001902431,0.000078301855,0.0002349175,0.568146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8839276,0.00006272068,0.0062837484,0.09628398,0.00628426,0.00025384908,0.000046954203,0.000068606016,0.00678833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566305,0.0004157822,0.001004728,0.00057541084,0.0013891232,0.00095192826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935787,0.0021986945,0.00068176386,0.0009403422,0.0020070903,0.0005934315],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019058824,0.00035443995,0.00037712537,0.00056114944,0.002957202,0.011977471,0.0044894246,0.00022512265,0.0032850625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021853484,0.00032351047,0.00009008284,0.0046814675,0.00045231197,0.04828273,0.002149041,0.000652969,0.0010860858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003857499,0.00021203807,0.0015043353,0.000557522,0.00010172972,0.0000041605986,0.113573626,0.00064694305,0.00011368372,0.124727,0.7535109,0.004662338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030116402,0.000091232454,0.007573616,0.00020495562,0.00063676,0.000006527639,0.024322823,0.000062471605,0.0012968818,0.00047302397,0.96451664,0.0005138831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007972751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031068018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8069549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003792592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023217946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789029632","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5022","title":"COLONIAL LEGACIES AND COMPETING MASCULINITIES: THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA’S RETURN TO REASON IN R. V. KAPP","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Colonialism; Economic Justice; Race (biology); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02513155698544115,"score_gpt":0.27654051279081165,"score_spread":0.2514089558053705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789029632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9206841,0.00015370021,0.0000083089835,0.013169092,0.0005109587,0.0003578619,0.000040435418,0.000009725646,0.06506581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99595016,0.000026371456,0.00011129469,0.0005729817,0.0003828268,0.0000065029953,5.6433294e-7,0.000007499149,0.0029418059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998959,0.00009627988,0.00020991957,0.00014146308,0.0003600274,0.00023332579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925315,0.00020587785,0.00008887495,0.00014568647,0.00016806235,0.0001383561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006253491,0.000062364736,0.00016772903,0.00017777656,0.0004029497,0.00015042463,0.00041969668,0.00004926253,0.00017674397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006880182,0.00006722288,0.000020322092,0.0002726937,0.0005689352,0.00016821086,0.000098237026,0.000093351606,0.0000047530366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061061035,0.00011615003,0.022757538,0.0006905966,0.000098887496,0.000054848097,0.592338,0.00018451075,0.001694339,0.028647667,0.34960294,0.0032038465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023493503,0.000088370034,0.052339617,0.00020377529,0.00006543521,0.0000011645154,0.02770427,0.00002550315,0.00022091973,0.000084843734,0.9188599,0.00017127793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56925696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032607364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020738454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36789125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789070291","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5021","title":"OUT OF THE CLOSET AND UP THE LADDER? DIVERSITY IN ONTARIO’S BIG LAW FIRMS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Closet; Lesbian; Negotiation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Legal profession; Public relations; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1411676094563412,"score_gpt":0.3840802655985737,"score_spread":0.24291265614223254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789070291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7677158,0.000012834169,0.000011011022,0.025923595,0.0014936189,0.0002971313,0.000008816085,0.000008017321,0.20452917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937551,0.0000041250883,0.000051981766,0.0022735463,0.000187109,0.0000035322744,4.9672303e-7,0.000002936268,0.0037211718],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992623,0.00011167961,0.00014827015,0.00010487038,0.00025374524,0.00011913986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991885,0.00026057317,0.00012681712,0.00019432463,0.00019197253,0.000037815866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057948165,0.000049445855,0.000080691025,0.00004177142,0.00042165353,0.000084019266,0.00052766973,0.00004754281,0.00032997128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049544236,0.000033676613,0.000020945463,0.00031974597,0.0004756912,0.00037240842,0.00032073562,0.00019348889,0.000016636108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012719384,0.00021069162,0.2238734,0.000053812397,0.000051409213,6.729228e-7,0.54190826,0.000010469368,0.00022992947,0.2036043,0.027202202,0.0027276329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022409795,0.00003473948,0.49419442,0.000040563442,0.000088709196,2.165588e-7,0.011732556,0.0000036357103,0.00039392483,0.0018751031,0.49131867,0.00009336819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3553134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7623826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53017575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005166755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041579004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64897966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790950295","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5043","title":"LAWYER COMPETENCIES FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE: TWO EMPIRICAL STUDIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Thompson Rivers University; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Framing (construction); Economic Justice; Sociology; Critical reflection; Legal profession; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.34434728378089996,"score_gpt":0.5682591560974322,"score_spread":0.2239118723165322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790950295","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32544437,0.00032235842,0.008867788,0.3291536,0.010818766,0.0039873635,0.00013526884,0.00036341004,0.3209071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437977,0.000042977063,0.014874074,0.029268062,0.004930735,0.0002636582,0.0000072669063,0.00003951067,0.006776015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980772,0.00014064742,0.00043755377,0.0003706281,0.00052974315,0.00044421316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956718,0.0014366627,0.00021938517,0.0003319445,0.0020874573,0.0002527492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048652,0.00016565289,0.00029560356,0.00027620824,0.0009029241,0.00060738716,0.0011276099,0.00008444491,0.00057222764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006658883,0.00015941825,0.000066323555,0.0013035451,0.00041372492,0.0017374159,0.00031724194,0.00018901222,0.00028375143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039478135,0.00043788375,0.0052349456,0.0004929628,0.0002179402,0.0000024881165,0.09563466,0.0001501601,0.0007325653,0.06935603,0.8209679,0.0063776905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040272958,0.00019062193,0.008534221,0.00009329505,0.00051136006,7.515015e-7,0.022979127,0.000047646674,0.0010379442,0.0011869911,0.964693,0.0003223037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011946992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030023428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6183533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013178673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008165602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79717857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792841334","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5042","title":"TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AND THE CHALLENGING PURSUIT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Parallels; Injustice; Transitional justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Order (exchange); Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.03941185229071531,"score_gpt":0.3462690387864825,"score_spread":0.3068571864957672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792841334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37255436,0.00015671788,0.0023316238,0.017538287,0.0017082698,0.0007948288,0.00007668686,0.00006476389,0.6047745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341536,0.000017091244,0.00025438186,0.0010141227,0.0025684799,0.000011467839,0.0000023785815,0.000012062321,0.0027046383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984166,0.00013338782,0.0002848971,0.00019838236,0.00072601915,0.0002407319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868524,0.00046957805,0.00015647335,0.00010981207,0.0004996443,0.00007927442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008766845,0.00010818599,0.00021336271,0.000103411345,0.00084916933,0.000111563066,0.0006936636,0.000084242034,0.0006437994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021465776,0.00008617568,0.00007112623,0.00011810093,0.0011719529,0.00032112116,0.00010168986,0.00012160796,0.000033602133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002451685,0.000039684528,0.0000051949064,0.00017698518,0.000039633105,0.0000014221117,0.016635092,0.000015832256,0.00012778635,0.9812548,0.0012614744,0.0001969014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01749762,0.001161982,0.08213042,0.0015180529,0.023042737,0.000030349755,0.04954436,0.0032454545,0.0073018232,0.38182428,0.42958707,0.003115847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031473293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003224514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.620861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033165114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012691697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70491517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279931030","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4529","title":"Balancing Necessity and Individual Rights in the Fight Against Transnational Terrorism: “Targeted Killings” and International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Harm; Political science; Law; Human rights; International law; Terrorism; Norm (philosophy); State (computer science); Population; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.033224971161041957,"score_gpt":0.31984779874374564,"score_spread":0.2866228275827037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279931030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9066213,0.00004001786,0.00006148712,0.01045471,0.00025776235,0.00029996154,0.00003505796,0.00001923729,0.082210496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954619,0.000004550585,0.0002903275,0.0033872393,0.00030337292,0.000007948342,0.000018615203,0.0000032454213,0.0005227902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883467,0.00006861497,0.00021889458,0.00019919725,0.00050943706,0.00016917205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949175,0.00017653345,0.0000809812,0.00007160855,0.000112164686,0.000066967135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049407524,0.00009588386,0.0001215283,0.000125078,0.00032759664,0.0002309216,0.00052588957,0.00007094906,0.0000900729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035682744,0.00007362897,0.000025700723,0.000083816674,0.00014050193,0.00057700847,0.000033890246,0.00014262393,0.0000021547744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002813609,0.000055733006,0.00058866444,0.000008060376,0.00001381278,0.000006465851,0.008009056,0.00002987436,0.000069913185,0.99071,0.0002056971,0.00027458026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017238859,0.00014985786,0.50538963,0.00018973889,0.0001564834,0.000006327571,0.0010970676,0.00047395934,0.000646145,0.3913212,0.098269515,0.0005761626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040734813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002462079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5993888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034361354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040423638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30025023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280710510","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4560","title":"Equality Kapped; Media Unleashed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Media coverage; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08740563674334273,"score_gpt":0.39071923331713176,"score_spread":0.30331359657378903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W280710510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6271602,0.0005215509,0.00024852453,0.02522423,0.001120906,0.0011159437,0.000032775264,0.0003177918,0.34425807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994993,0.00007264304,0.00094065594,0.0014822127,0.00083886884,0.000011143757,0.0000028126954,0.000009803954,0.0016488667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978971,0.00018985313,0.00035070526,0.0003106883,0.00077460054,0.0004770607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986887,0.00034977807,0.00015932867,0.00023571197,0.000295058,0.0002714231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007004578,0.00016784646,0.0003323353,0.00006666989,0.00043508067,0.000137811,0.000832384,0.00013093348,0.0004209644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019290574,0.00014757799,0.000101057376,0.0004693464,0.00025501862,0.00051487866,0.00014978633,0.00016857966,0.00018981806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008775167,0.0016119753,0.033389077,0.00067274773,0.00046061253,0.000057824444,0.46660188,0.00068864896,0.010554375,0.23567362,0.1334962,0.11591553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010988722,0.00020646636,0.75706446,0.00021680296,0.00048256622,6.2542784e-7,0.02352753,0.000029896451,0.0023528384,0.0033453484,0.2106939,0.0009807198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035239724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011661765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7236754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014371885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099155965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60180557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883504706","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5110","title":"Calvinball: Users’ Rights, Public Choice Theory and Rules Mutable Games","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Metaphor; Politics; Normative; Narrative; Law and economics; Metagaming; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Game studies; Disadvantaged; Political science; Computer science; Aesthetics; Media studies; Law; Game theory; Sequential game; Economics; Art; Simultaneous game; Literature; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04441747048901842,"score_gpt":0.27246178173802676,"score_spread":0.22804431124900834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883504706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5761285,0.000337912,0.0006126699,0.0013030499,0.0006632431,0.00045109208,0.0000064705628,0.0001756128,0.4203215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898477,0.000010911977,0.00018319006,0.0034355356,0.002207571,0.000015033035,0.000007314363,0.000035792724,0.00425693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858266,0.00002685056,0.000299843,0.00040305726,0.0002884143,0.0003991456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868035,0.00023335453,0.00015116208,0.00036245768,0.0005223478,0.000050334133],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049747486,0.0002251431,0.0002783683,0.00034926858,0.00028484425,0.0008349302,0.00069632346,0.00008895847,0.0062352447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010395772,0.00016895584,0.000050499824,0.00046818182,0.0002692229,0.0026658645,0.0006230629,0.00013943552,0.0009602945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011265044,0.0005422661,0.012598669,0.0017823171,0.00035031434,0.000018803355,0.0012851313,0.000005501987,0.0063035474,0.14269882,0.8052522,0.028035918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064039853,0.000085032574,0.021843879,0.0001799216,0.00034761676,0.0000027096726,0.00022349082,0.0023999654,0.0026038254,0.009091263,0.9620369,0.00054501445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013712647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032542102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41606456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020691892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003574977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883590287","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5111","title":"The Natural Right To Parody: Assessing The (Potential) Parody/Satire Dichotomies In American And Canadian Copyright Laws","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Intellectual property; Copyright law; Normative; Statute; Natural (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Balance (ability); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.013756937038472814,"score_gpt":0.32661153164367096,"score_spread":0.31285459460519816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883590287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8496971,0.0005193948,0.000015058373,0.05388012,0.0012711539,0.00090966077,0.000028416109,0.000045761408,0.09363333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937392,0.00010622218,0.00022313169,0.0032643743,0.0007803166,0.00002724777,0.0000016836892,0.0000114594595,0.0018464059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998345,0.00023182436,0.0002432299,0.00027267536,0.00040520317,0.0005020477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988661,0.00030760557,0.00012711989,0.00027227192,0.00017240849,0.0002545316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086357194,0.0001375539,0.00019073852,0.000026878368,0.00171296,0.00066715566,0.00089490094,0.000081266255,0.00006150593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042871744,0.000081358034,0.000049927385,0.00067050883,0.0013663712,0.00034546255,0.00013407266,0.000243109,0.00002449497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038269226,0.00023783626,0.04861132,0.00020883078,0.00044806354,0.000092285685,0.41729194,0.00030569252,0.0028898716,0.06950821,0.39898235,0.061040916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026593538,0.00006658434,0.12807171,0.00011314556,0.00012753141,0.0000016128341,0.038820747,0.00012716491,0.0005712731,0.00093700463,0.830582,0.00031524856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1328947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62372917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49083444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012806302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003329445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883741933","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5108","title":"Copyright User Rights and Access to Justice (Introduction)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Copyright law; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Internet privacy; Humanities; Intellectual property; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03929587922700912,"score_gpt":0.2843314831938037,"score_spread":0.24503560396679458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883741933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5285837,0.00014960964,0.0040441253,0.013619317,0.006122976,0.0019127466,0.000014257325,0.00039780678,0.44515544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640438,0.000007303012,0.0007682689,0.009075191,0.01617275,0.00003987336,0.0000103915245,0.00006390129,0.009818507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978586,0.000019283885,0.0004721726,0.0007080242,0.00044997988,0.0004919266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981695,0.00009767768,0.00019248427,0.00055792567,0.0008883232,0.00009412934],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003256293,0.0003292044,0.00039154242,0.00056098436,0.00044831695,0.0012805475,0.0011457569,0.00011199703,0.00973027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054207543,0.0002580934,0.00006724181,0.0010163853,0.00019345124,0.0039352826,0.0010825583,0.00019086356,0.0027366546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005564571,0.00011786977,0.0005183641,0.0005636359,0.00005880106,0.0000062828803,0.00025603565,0.000023813744,0.0022291096,0.0025688608,0.99124056,0.0018601916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053328805,0.00012208262,0.009729611,0.00014388816,0.0007698557,0.000004599056,0.00008845356,0.0021502106,0.008617603,0.0010732722,0.9761838,0.0005833774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010622303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035797266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4354601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039890223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035742414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905855193","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5271","title":"Ishaq v Canada: “Social Science Facts” in Feminist Interventions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Appeal; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Psychological intervention; Economic Justice; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Jurisdiction; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0786006915450807,"score_gpt":0.40273191275980935,"score_spread":0.32413122121472865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905855193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45751646,0.000017879262,0.00004620952,0.0027551635,0.0012384455,0.00027522334,0.000022772718,0.000017618999,0.5381102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928929,0.0000015146425,0.000085841304,0.0004131673,0.0010384581,0.000007423467,8.6147156e-7,0.000006442538,0.0055533974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985031,0.000047371876,0.00024725875,0.0002836515,0.00063151034,0.00028710772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991333,0.000050835886,0.00010901997,0.0001330168,0.00048051382,0.00009330835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006465791,0.00007413212,0.00012963566,0.00018921893,0.00061164773,0.00013315905,0.0008907888,0.00003688657,0.0006104707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037535108,0.00006714489,0.000043266667,0.0005401363,0.0011538898,0.00037414723,0.00017386243,0.00009493799,0.000028755505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009609939,0.0003028617,0.009385616,0.00014437549,0.000036938643,0.000018769406,0.03491101,0.000015687672,0.0009673237,0.9339355,0.01758408,0.002601735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058350986,0.00019902944,0.48980522,0.00046054937,0.0000907066,0.000002018595,0.012440029,0.000022687704,0.006515291,0.00446886,0.48480687,0.00060521095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2642095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6821914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92946666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033819544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010791117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7406902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906152195","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5689","title":"Closing the Gender Gap in Corporate Advancement: Insights and Solutions from Behavioural Economics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Incentive; Gender gap; Public relations; Scholarship; Bounded rationality; Nudge theory; Power (physics); Political science; Endowment; Marketing; Public economics; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.36478337662741084,"score_gpt":0.34749011718738637,"score_spread":0.017293259440024467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906152195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98431367,0.00011570664,0.0003113237,0.0009480009,0.00031015958,0.0002075784,0.000025627744,0.000012034556,0.013755912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998759,0.00010226517,0.00032527247,0.00048815977,0.00020363224,0.0000032430542,0.0000034113277,0.000004364356,0.00011066835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919784,0.000117772266,0.00016940564,0.0001826526,0.00012509672,0.00020720287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994684,0.00008864323,0.00013178312,0.00014852866,0.000083872685,0.00007878413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033404576,0.00006981402,0.000110611436,0.000060691233,0.00043799332,0.000101716425,0.00033485275,0.000055911143,0.000121127916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006702903,0.00006414004,0.000021445396,0.00015008432,0.0003330639,0.0005095768,0.00021369482,0.000083849314,0.00002416031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039095903,0.000480097,0.4076658,0.00010823411,0.00014705826,0.000011333178,0.34842804,0.00067481253,0.0013125811,0.22991335,0.0028997085,0.007968034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009161043,0.000102595695,0.9149253,0.00006867836,0.00029970886,3.662642e-7,0.039619952,0.000423182,0.0009304696,0.026529418,0.015765565,0.00041869705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006083343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008656893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5072595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006268022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009341258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9196236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906213088","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5277","title":"What Are We Waiting For? It’s Time to Regulate Paralegals in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Statutory law; Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Duty; Law; Nothing; Public interest; Political science; Confidentiality; Public administration","score_opus":0.10535361073010306,"score_gpt":0.40775622145511653,"score_spread":0.30240261072501345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906213088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26463592,0.00006462296,0.00012501322,0.6298957,0.0024827656,0.0013565421,0.000035520476,0.00004332471,0.10136059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672921,0.000021304086,0.0009378327,0.01266916,0.0009676602,0.00006266748,0.0000037487723,0.000017626935,0.018027902],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874365,0.00008464104,0.00031411464,0.00021390813,0.0003297477,0.00031392602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985252,0.0004586564,0.00018944024,0.00019423872,0.0004735636,0.00015888903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006545472,0.000087147964,0.00016055674,0.00015364883,0.00023513814,0.00036739898,0.0004702288,0.000050672927,0.0012986045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016257211,0.0000961806,0.000021945789,0.000802437,0.000058578855,0.0016128499,0.00006599418,0.000116199306,0.00017039853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019986821,0.0001235424,0.0038292767,0.00018757192,0.000044112672,0.000005714104,0.045480758,0.0006240424,0.00065101485,0.010880339,0.92306256,0.014911216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016047592,0.000029907893,0.006842457,0.00029018847,0.000038107144,3.2751e-7,0.02130009,0.00017929757,0.00070179853,0.00022348491,0.9700434,0.00019046565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54063064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8591617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7026562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025236158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024358425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906445147","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5274","title":"Les Avocats Aux Pieds Nus En Chine, Vecteurs D’accès À La Justice?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.061287312456530296,"score_gpt":0.377069838938347,"score_spread":0.3157825264818167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906445147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07592173,0.01203091,0.0004787992,0.016539851,0.009493688,0.00079352316,0.00008564058,0.0001857173,0.88447016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9295943,0.0006489932,0.0012648276,0.0011766803,0.0072246483,0.00004767912,0.000005127434,0.00007174636,0.059966013],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654686,0.0006231896,0.00058129383,0.00066376425,0.0008025578,0.0007823255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978368,0.00031616277,0.00033690527,0.00048472526,0.0006438174,0.00038156268],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097398873,0.00045402016,0.0006315858,0.00017976265,0.0017948175,0.00020015759,0.0015255702,0.00044162883,0.0020580797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014276318,0.00044935083,0.00021330346,0.0010474646,0.0021886788,0.00085913006,0.00050296914,0.00052508106,0.0010290105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005505375,0.0011541023,0.0023522053,0.0030148302,0.00079226773,0.00012171366,0.4670246,0.00020945174,0.0014627284,0.14859362,0.24608558,0.12863836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005277688,0.00041809434,0.017759543,0.0005737644,0.0024909198,0.000009597493,0.029557506,0.000049989456,0.00026764616,0.0008215078,0.9468147,0.0007089375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00176153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026059565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85367256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002336804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000420269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916627404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5690","title":"Freedom and Access to Housing: Three Conceptions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negative liberty; Premise; State (computer science); Power (physics); Property (philosophy); Law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10248292355161469,"score_gpt":0.3805958446446976,"score_spread":0.2781129210930829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916627404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6316828,0.00016970227,0.004277767,0.01726017,0.0012314485,0.0013712053,0.000040289833,0.00018580929,0.34378082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935985,0.000025334448,0.0011088894,0.001802372,0.0015203094,0.000018872239,0.0000010165634,0.000017424085,0.0019072822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986703,0.000055413486,0.00022527945,0.00031347576,0.00037761984,0.00035791495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893004,0.000096522985,0.00007945985,0.0002648355,0.00030034932,0.00032881033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003353739,0.00012780368,0.00021340259,0.000149182,0.0005079836,0.000495988,0.0009207643,0.00008496574,0.0008484651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031350946,0.000102417594,0.00003629231,0.0005062005,0.000532846,0.00088161515,0.00040861097,0.000106461426,0.00015953314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018189598,0.0013058259,0.10291876,0.0007890292,0.0005132231,0.00008789986,0.09543494,0.0006236106,0.024561109,0.3528064,0.2785405,0.14059974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006127256,0.00038897284,0.105513245,0.00019302685,0.00022241895,0.0000013134337,0.0008693013,0.00012055929,0.0022044843,0.0013931519,0.8879655,0.0005153122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007848774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013233903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.609425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004356932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016219803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921280898","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5692","title":"George M. Duck Lecture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Windsor; Art; Humanities; Library science; Art history; Biology; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.04109636855055323,"score_gpt":0.3630343156885368,"score_spread":0.32193794713798357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921280898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39678064,0.00011256979,0.0012561281,0.0073569347,0.0016008945,0.00046737777,0.0000106874295,0.00014000498,0.5922748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898443,0.000030121959,0.0003747277,0.0012139935,0.0024245975,0.000007317063,0.0000012929847,0.000014309107,0.0060893036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988976,0.00005912462,0.00017791144,0.00020726187,0.00037423486,0.0002838688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992001,0.00007852903,0.000085451546,0.00021497534,0.00026173244,0.00015922774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037014947,0.00009001288,0.00014202848,0.000106488325,0.0003196985,0.000113001304,0.0004719698,0.000102240476,0.0016565737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027205306,0.00008931507,0.00005099022,0.00036919845,0.0002213773,0.0003105272,0.00010517305,0.000093054274,0.00026935156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012605633,0.0009998572,0.035331737,0.00063727965,0.0003812954,0.000046209567,0.22979453,0.00020490453,0.030440837,0.17744882,0.28381577,0.2396382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020021145,0.00013228663,0.025401574,0.000048908158,0.000102863996,6.3257517e-7,0.00067083945,0.000025861253,0.0026982566,0.00052493135,0.970017,0.00017660749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025560835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017897697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6862013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041499155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014112872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922143494","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5788","title":"Advocacy in Non-Adversarial Family Law: A Recommendation for Revision to the Model Code","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Negotiation; Family law; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12062335744431228,"score_gpt":0.45620860557214055,"score_spread":0.33558524812782825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922143494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10274617,0.00001792662,0.11409371,0.3450617,0.0039550676,0.0046154144,0.000099414276,0.00008257975,0.42932802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745839,0.0000105494555,0.008553467,0.014156078,0.0012350389,0.00008286036,0.00001143149,0.000013461651,0.001353191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989942,0.00009211646,0.0002886216,0.00019856327,0.0002221089,0.00020439163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869937,0.00040167134,0.00013519448,0.00019999733,0.00048191327,0.00008183919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013505371,0.0000749315,0.00011312444,0.0001327466,0.00038332015,0.00020175084,0.00048286596,0.00006634516,0.00014354057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018338374,0.00006612142,0.00003052842,0.00066263386,0.00007994744,0.00089095207,0.00008031377,0.00013532345,0.00009851994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012964485,0.0005323055,0.00033558576,0.00015490295,0.00004271093,4.4091746e-7,0.17544544,0.0047727968,0.00211137,0.17213455,0.58185667,0.061316773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040620143,0.00009811006,0.001147813,0.000067321314,0.000057908856,7.9170434e-8,0.005914639,0.0040953187,0.00024091227,0.000951253,0.9868812,0.00013923124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005543662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005068721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87183774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009616829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054964545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8380395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923462742","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5691","title":"Rule 2.1 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure: Responding to Vexatious Litigation While Advancing Access to Justice?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Rule of law; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Law; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Political science; Resolution (logic); Procedural justice; American rule; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; History; Politics","score_opus":0.045308506931187854,"score_gpt":0.35854048593889065,"score_spread":0.3132319790077028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923462742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9063958,0.000021314043,0.0018574467,0.002058248,0.00027414926,0.0010659313,0.00005815388,0.000044937286,0.08822405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909911,0.0000058581613,0.0047485176,0.00064414245,0.000542389,0.00007953866,0.000006069832,0.000025032501,0.0029573457],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979306,0.00006804887,0.00057311,0.0003884725,0.00063620514,0.0004035986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789923,0.0002454479,0.0003751307,0.0003983258,0.0007772938,0.00030456783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074803416,0.00015759634,0.00032309646,0.00045120533,0.00033543017,0.0001567809,0.0011742644,0.0001039821,0.00046154263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011731868,0.00016836877,0.00006474513,0.0012516254,0.00015880998,0.00080984045,0.00043110322,0.00012483499,0.00008049671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019937346,0.001442278,0.049419057,0.004643884,0.00028267276,0.000008583427,0.4276819,0.0117385825,0.21638657,0.22065333,0.05150318,0.014246225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015019596,0.001272026,0.2834916,0.002923042,0.0015827295,0.0000026604082,0.015257889,0.00029767764,0.23273474,0.0068978276,0.4523559,0.0016819317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018317819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07288752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.412424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031038266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010150578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98821926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936011478","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5790","title":"Interrelated Treaty Orders Across the Generations: Autonomy, Obligation and Confederacy in the Wabanaki Compact (1725-26)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Obligation; Law; Autonomy; Political science; Indigenous; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.044858255266627116,"score_gpt":0.38817658836834285,"score_spread":0.3433183331017157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936011478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426487,0.0000957957,0.00011391809,0.005360479,0.00045416015,0.00093101826,0.0000067018173,0.00003255085,0.050356638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725866,0.00025165448,0.00007535076,0.00062549394,0.000593799,0.0000075284106,0.000005585662,0.000010816741,0.0011710983],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985812,0.00034664283,0.00029965752,0.00019766515,0.00025130043,0.00032358637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893713,0.00036220034,0.00015036474,0.00022723932,0.00024562617,0.00007744199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011896219,0.00010537921,0.0001382253,0.0000785583,0.0033969844,0.00035698694,0.0004943413,0.00009379467,0.00009026086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000560356,0.00006452929,0.000027865484,0.00039299382,0.00051700533,0.00046684168,0.000006308834,0.00015353579,0.00003823747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004015982,0.00012271559,0.0040692566,0.000036895693,0.0000238902,8.980251e-7,0.95704347,0.000065249085,0.000016432747,0.036609903,0.0009885245,0.0009825786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095746055,0.0003138214,0.2045632,0.00019440398,0.00019298926,0.000006286789,0.11273185,0.0010887131,0.0006511019,0.0018245209,0.67702985,0.00044581827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13782397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5860353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84431165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012481071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025607368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947552661","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5783","title":"Upholding the Honour of the Crown","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Framing (construction); Normative; Politics; Law; Sociology; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08689514669520593,"score_gpt":0.38485570053341756,"score_spread":0.29796055383821163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947552661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8153593,0.000058886122,0.00007355142,0.013735194,0.0011994595,0.0005313599,0.0000246917,0.000025327108,0.16899225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944757,0.000014548412,0.000087311804,0.0011913725,0.0008523028,0.0000054352136,1.9192052e-7,0.000009928264,0.003363202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876934,0.00015233822,0.0002445831,0.00013951948,0.00038287998,0.0003113615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893713,0.0002171962,0.00017318029,0.00036784224,0.00020697167,0.000097693366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000694828,0.000082551014,0.00014034867,0.000045620858,0.00066480605,0.00011598836,0.0012620337,0.000066276996,0.00030158123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004279747,0.00005350868,0.00007935736,0.0003287329,0.0005895137,0.00015062666,0.00023647025,0.00015270972,0.000027948092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020405745,0.00030557025,0.01969483,0.00041797245,0.00016149749,0.0000056366657,0.15020378,0.00014434682,0.004408564,0.68320173,0.13134715,0.009904854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006643702,0.00020470563,0.33451632,0.00045614628,0.00044673655,0.0000037414554,0.016741,0.000096442054,0.022246039,0.010942113,0.6131389,0.00054345577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006808755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017057579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6722596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036337977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021081371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947763714","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5787","title":"Short Circuit: A Failing Technology for Administering Justice in Nunavut","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Arctic; Work (physics); The arctic; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Geology","score_opus":0.13040596679264843,"score_gpt":0.4492414154012963,"score_spread":0.3188354486086479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947763714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94397056,0.00013586508,0.0038154984,0.0017540576,0.002683831,0.002999405,0.00004388829,0.0001330948,0.044463817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942713,0.00002533476,0.0016969953,0.0014428532,0.001174704,0.00059238746,0.0000037182983,0.000050189246,0.00074252416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734855,0.00006816968,0.0007398949,0.00044132062,0.00014914227,0.0012529021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819577,0.00056711957,0.00018145192,0.0004081398,0.00053819455,0.000109327564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079655607,0.00019935878,0.00051089533,0.00047638683,0.0012846411,0.00001366248,0.0006478599,0.00035561554,0.00019053335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010436248,0.00020485467,0.000055911354,0.00051555014,0.00013943925,0.00015315489,0.00069408707,0.00039938258,0.00019058285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046691033,0.0015636708,0.54506606,0.030381553,0.0007660822,0.00018679694,0.2773412,0.00059039006,0.021922652,0.046147957,0.025627203,0.045737367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009250453,0.007077604,0.2870334,0.004727799,0.0036371315,0.000042045263,0.38319817,0.0027066735,0.0070022014,0.005330333,0.28655052,0.0034436407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024854497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008067329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26092333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002484512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003401055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.988055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947885322","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5786","title":"Informal Justice: An Examination of Why Ontarians Do Not Seek Legal Advice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal psychology; Adjudication; Political science; Legal culture; Legal profession; Premise; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Scholarship; Law; Legal advice; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.059316527181500094,"score_gpt":0.3957055367769666,"score_spread":0.3363890095954665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947885322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39437824,0.00001085106,0.0015799663,0.008738992,0.0018074064,0.0005326777,0.000034238103,0.00012659765,0.592791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99024934,0.00000765939,0.0026179936,0.003393746,0.0011724966,0.000016399777,0.000012070015,0.000014745963,0.0025155742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820983,0.00017988707,0.00047367567,0.00021981771,0.0006364641,0.0002803504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974321,0.00032674082,0.00038721893,0.000319899,0.0013594149,0.00017463803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012958561,0.00012122431,0.0001793097,0.00030164243,0.00040675627,0.00032382205,0.0006854162,0.00012908856,0.0011366543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017700391,0.00013174144,0.000038217273,0.000992791,0.00029592947,0.004531509,0.00008799895,0.0002444243,0.000111928835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000747291,0.0014012986,0.0023550417,0.0007374427,0.00014503005,0.000006308059,0.3209097,0.00033386392,0.004522932,0.5503359,0.060722593,0.057782613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006646243,0.00054630707,0.14255483,0.00011317197,0.0006742334,0.0000030696306,0.0408857,0.00035511656,0.0033125405,0.00015843302,0.81028396,0.00044800367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015215378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089050075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74956137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007524412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001028353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948412693","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5784","title":"L’accès à la justice en contexte numérique : l’information juridique par et pour les justiciables sur les médias sociaux","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10363388441470366,"score_gpt":0.4088481063230622,"score_spread":0.3052142219083585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948412693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09819758,0.0010745206,0.016333297,0.30745912,0.0059966873,0.001396155,0.00032221904,0.0002328453,0.5689876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964793,0.0011483179,0.004422721,0.009262656,0.004001851,0.00009039163,0.00004362035,0.00006278414,0.016174637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957013,0.001405191,0.0010328471,0.00041451253,0.00075725984,0.0006888555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916257,0.0042255204,0.00092003803,0.00043484202,0.0024651645,0.0003287082],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032977536,0.00040046737,0.0004828333,0.00035821254,0.0011173361,0.0009827636,0.0011440932,0.0006244674,0.0033770928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010721498,0.00044849628,0.00014806628,0.0013922155,0.0009630675,0.00651586,0.00027823547,0.00096850266,0.0010779174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023474566,0.0006682335,0.001293405,0.0016078033,0.0002122557,0.0000064956785,0.09204519,0.000417417,0.000453225,0.65815717,0.21309884,0.031805243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005659031,0.00014629427,0.020896168,0.00055172713,0.000864333,0.000008400875,0.04995751,0.00037993147,0.0010829979,0.0015007431,0.92345136,0.0005946212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01680461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003718848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86659545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028543867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045529706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949668285","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5789","title":"Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Resolution (logic); Element (criminal law); Civil procedure; Determinative; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07811686466140803,"score_gpt":0.39798115150442565,"score_spread":0.3198642868430176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949668285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45130315,0.00013100736,0.0024524836,0.08093623,0.0054243966,0.0010974904,0.00006893819,0.000101170626,0.45848513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941409,0.00003272047,0.0009735878,0.0019780442,0.0015139435,0.00003199312,0.000010729329,0.000014903352,0.0013031468],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791884,0.00021315156,0.00046055924,0.00030269971,0.00067035545,0.00043438765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985768,0.00018621128,0.00025674285,0.0002763088,0.00052520726,0.00017868902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009130235,0.00012429441,0.000193133,0.0002834898,0.0004451608,0.0002159422,0.0006825421,0.0001006964,0.00061641535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018825292,0.00013611208,0.000031539854,0.0017236548,0.00019972555,0.0017088255,0.00014961555,0.00028954874,0.00006595606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014130896,0.0009983971,0.07858538,0.00040798838,0.00015462715,0.000035232668,0.059486076,0.0017299087,0.0017112147,0.22912897,0.55805653,0.068292566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047647953,0.00008422534,0.47552374,0.0001632857,0.00011593849,9.783594e-7,0.004657191,0.0007249515,0.00068609125,0.00092430785,0.5162572,0.000385607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95258534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9678256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008892631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074595893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W296552018","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4507","title":"The Deliberative City","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Zoning; Political science; Institution; Context (archaeology); Public administration; State (computer science); Foundation (evidence); Law; Law and economics; Environmental law; Action (physics); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.050480010883915086,"score_gpt":0.36581220786518404,"score_spread":0.31533219698126896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W296552018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34120515,0.000036400572,0.000054186512,0.017229386,0.0014139124,0.00037942667,0.000008712904,0.00005583446,0.63961697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932449,0.000016097381,0.00021165184,0.0010238398,0.0015613458,0.000015443564,4.7386644e-7,0.000008653386,0.0039176214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989395,0.00009013317,0.00016578256,0.00015024694,0.00039961466,0.00025469527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989578,0.0003632819,0.00008243055,0.00019354718,0.00024916488,0.00015374753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058855314,0.00007895824,0.00011715633,0.000032518255,0.000917378,0.00022795744,0.0008018259,0.00009322469,0.0001883897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008973048,0.000058472502,0.000060187496,0.00027328,0.00042355017,0.00035708066,0.00013684499,0.00026799692,0.00008140305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001131264,0.00012845051,0.0036659888,0.000029433431,0.00006091374,0.000005505198,0.040114325,0.000013922304,0.0025894742,0.9175972,0.016932625,0.018749084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038822443,0.00009060268,0.030592997,0.000029002837,0.00016191094,4.342294e-7,0.004184974,0.000022270398,0.0028160026,0.06473028,0.89655703,0.00042627178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018639864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037672578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8796244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020985586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020067106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70558226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995072367","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6068","title":"The Global Social Enterprise Lawmaking Phenomenon: State Initiatives on Purpose, Capital, and Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Legislation; Business; State (computer science); Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Legislature; Law","score_opus":0.023531656479758394,"score_gpt":0.27072079324226034,"score_spread":0.24718913676250195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995072367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219594,0.000051873627,0.00016692454,0.0008289574,0.00032110763,0.00040969328,0.000010273079,0.000041651223,0.07621009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731153,0.000013103512,0.000030705098,0.0017943812,0.00043209593,0.000014302244,0.000005694896,0.000013535023,0.000384627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910384,0.00001582972,0.00022711081,0.00021577586,0.00025025994,0.00018716796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905884,0.000055331213,0.0006016786,0.00013665536,0.0001328976,0.00001458031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019625873,0.00013161034,0.00014511248,0.00007767375,0.00021349879,0.0005228419,0.0002742798,0.000029789238,0.00009228637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113727576,0.00010690694,0.000030730665,0.00029466904,0.00005692412,0.0010956113,0.00021379959,0.0000812134,0.00019723822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028693725,0.00062458904,0.3290127,0.0025964638,0.0002793189,0.000025314224,0.0055013737,0.0025024249,0.0034763808,0.515079,0.008842453,0.1291906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012174661,0.00007361418,0.9457481,0.00019417616,0.00012082983,6.3533935e-7,0.0019469196,0.0011837637,0.00019719912,0.0064470847,0.04242888,0.00044135025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010469286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074619056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6167354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034378147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021846594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5041776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995996282","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6066","title":"Dominium and The Empire of Laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Liberalism; Ideology; Corporate social responsibility; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Political science; Meaning (existential); Normative; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Politics; Epistemology; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023838906710334336,"score_gpt":0.2453728872747511,"score_spread":0.22153398056441675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995996282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91184455,0.00006530546,0.000017966591,0.0008083702,0.00027731725,0.00040491525,0.0000021326348,0.00001964801,0.086559765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963117,0.000004418919,0.00004685347,0.0012102028,0.00047506174,0.0000064772985,0.0000022091008,0.000014858665,0.0019281757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992472,0.000008668939,0.00024217222,0.00017174218,0.00019461567,0.000135626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992421,0.000093376875,0.00022864662,0.00028595194,0.00013880747,0.000011102327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002506895,0.00010729656,0.00025731945,0.00010992266,0.000058768615,0.0001426464,0.0004154959,0.000039587518,0.0004466577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002227918,0.0000698389,0.000050489132,0.00017108467,0.00012271063,0.0005826895,0.00031769235,0.00007247659,0.00017392289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014711345,0.00013877166,0.02745962,0.0028056623,0.000111600624,0.0000066570656,0.0006835212,0.00015601632,0.0018280293,0.9514164,0.011546254,0.0023763527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017674487,0.00017961574,0.5000004,0.001243454,0.002741312,0.0000065772047,0.0017338698,0.003459844,0.0044224747,0.11138551,0.35550132,0.0016511235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025619607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000856028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84003085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039780034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015942962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48905888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996403756","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6065","title":"Green Illusions: Governing CSR Aesthetics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Corporate governance; Corporation; Corporate branding; Aesthetics; Illusion; Public relations; Greenwashing; Salience (neuroscience); Corporate communication; Green marketing; Logos Bible Software; Phenomenon; Business; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Marketing; Law; Psychology; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01745214628211213,"score_gpt":0.2453919300888022,"score_spread":0.22793978380669006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996403756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636109,0.000052704672,0.00018638416,0.002012557,0.00046313173,0.0007237298,0.0000059103963,0.000091947506,0.032852728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928176,0.000006855228,0.00042164777,0.0036799773,0.0005980943,0.000020018651,0.000013452743,0.000059001493,0.0023833944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834794,0.000011725362,0.0003622808,0.0003869462,0.0005238411,0.00036729377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989198,0.00007331364,0.00026007532,0.00056776096,0.0001495777,0.000029474262],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029607277,0.00022144322,0.00028722425,0.00021952965,0.000104475264,0.00019858462,0.00086767715,0.00009520527,0.0013549472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022068962,0.00022160911,0.0000816085,0.0005454498,0.000088090135,0.0015306544,0.0012375868,0.00016283509,0.0024504093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051655405,0.0008812874,0.9163121,0.0077849994,0.000108016065,0.00006017205,0.0007314608,0.016915115,0.008204787,0.014674559,0.010441217,0.02336973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011206236,0.00005772789,0.67278606,0.00037521336,0.00040282804,0.0000043040122,0.001164325,0.0025032926,0.00035951642,0.001088597,0.31928217,0.0008553252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010211732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029186785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30884096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105622574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026412916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996503110","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6067","title":"The Impact of Whistleblowing Awards Programs on Corporate Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Commission; Corporate governance; Harm; Accounting; Whistle blowing; Business; Control (management); Compliance (psychology); Public relations; Law; Management; Political science; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.045354078382871324,"score_gpt":0.27740253668293474,"score_spread":0.23204845830006343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996503110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9482472,0.000045702247,0.000014408214,0.00019085995,0.0004403314,0.00055703794,0.0000051888524,0.000042821997,0.05045645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968552,0.0000063046405,0.00003029472,0.00018868633,0.0005399822,0.000012301768,0.0000070855854,0.000031812404,0.0023283106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986701,0.000010316871,0.0003522491,0.00026431688,0.00040948024,0.000293535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984259,0.00007186177,0.00070639123,0.0004893377,0.0002838514,0.00002267366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028999537,0.00019603666,0.00029339647,0.000087006025,0.00012776106,0.00032486767,0.0007882402,0.000053825344,0.00025395764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036060355,0.00012699502,0.00015675025,0.00038846344,0.000077094934,0.0007743498,0.00023358027,0.0001336339,0.00042150205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003170454,0.0013130087,0.28670278,0.0031440204,0.0006298137,0.000052231677,0.00046800554,0.009260891,0.0074287746,0.60693586,0.03949747,0.041396715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024697145,0.0006563283,0.90638506,0.0014469079,0.0005541646,0.0000021813278,0.00019165693,0.004184893,0.0016459642,0.024090566,0.057233695,0.0011388938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006489576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009967677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61968225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045510038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067179106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5417697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996654918","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6064","title":"Introduction - Corporate Social Responsibility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Humanities; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Public relations","score_opus":0.052869145422290986,"score_gpt":0.2964087148216558,"score_spread":0.24353956939936483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996654918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97494566,0.000008463468,0.000110978224,0.0031103669,0.001124226,0.000739305,0.0000037959887,0.00013773711,0.019819455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918535,4.2796714e-7,0.00020462577,0.0009809536,0.004352256,0.000013778858,0.000013841763,0.000039736668,0.0025409027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783504,0.000046753325,0.00066086644,0.00058056344,0.0005332722,0.00034350756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757826,0.000113265916,0.001093887,0.0005071797,0.0006810645,0.000026344544],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016349116,0.00020349806,0.0003928024,0.0003523459,0.0001597591,0.0003139203,0.00048649573,0.00011935967,0.0011403168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020804347,0.00021726677,0.0001241107,0.0011993725,0.00009096367,0.0016644885,0.0005267042,0.00021501849,0.0012062185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009959589,0.001010866,0.60401696,0.0056739817,0.00025986624,0.000067202855,0.0013088082,0.0018691788,0.19974111,0.06444647,0.07358225,0.03806374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011442784,0.000078946934,0.8955384,0.00009445623,0.0004986513,0.0000035618737,0.0010453638,0.0009253772,0.0039078672,0.012465257,0.083395705,0.00090214825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027332507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057366862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29152143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009610614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014869968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087131081","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6415","title":"Intersectionality: A Means for Addressing the Needs of Children with Mental Health Issues who are Engaged with the Family Law and Criminal Justice Systems?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Mental health; Intersectionality; Criminology; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Political science; Poverty; Family law; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Psychiatry; Gender studies","score_opus":0.11428662554284079,"score_gpt":0.3565692246497667,"score_spread":0.2422825991069259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087131081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972733,0.002745084,0.002042363,0.014868892,0.0002535362,0.0021492853,0.000299955,0.000053098523,0.004854794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927431,0.000020488189,0.0001525098,0.006454192,0.00044794191,0.000055770186,0.000009728759,0.000034686684,0.00008159535],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986081,0.00031814762,0.0002910708,0.00026163578,0.00027470937,0.0002463351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875873,0.0004002909,0.0003171367,0.00028612325,0.00012633372,0.00011138142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047887152,0.00019114936,0.0003686649,0.000060596412,0.00047630817,0.0001089794,0.0004127148,0.00004905154,0.000024800473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042615946,0.00010902731,0.000047213824,0.00023078713,0.0002726827,0.00016162367,0.00008904719,0.00035658912,0.000002915691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014879548,0.00084133697,0.014922987,0.008627876,0.0042770696,0.00001518884,0.83023906,0.0018196589,0.0007035551,0.04296419,0.07683324,0.0038762891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068977177,0.0037628815,0.24701469,0.0030650299,0.0058454643,0.00014986869,0.72031385,0.00035559814,0.0007369866,0.000024379904,0.01110514,0.000728381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012973755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002811226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2320917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019365445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005310895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44460046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087164928","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6419","title":"Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Contingency; Economic Justice; Payment; Work (physics); Praise; Business; Contingency plan; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Finance; Management; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06255586856556417,"score_gpt":0.2736351138590107,"score_spread":0.21107924529344652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087164928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6141147,0.0022773114,0.01682722,0.011037903,0.005433938,0.0029985083,0.0005206025,0.00033160902,0.3464582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909922,0.000095161515,0.0009808856,0.005144909,0.0021790536,0.000070259724,0.000008701769,0.00009414657,0.00043466515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671304,0.00003036143,0.0015035761,0.0009759845,0.00011740935,0.0006596201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976086,0.0001583813,0.0008952689,0.0006039845,0.00015362022,0.00058011827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006712681,0.00030802787,0.0010056492,0.0003302983,0.00018836798,0.0007731126,0.0018827384,0.00020685169,0.00057925354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011315969,0.00043166033,0.00018844743,0.00071136554,0.0000851871,0.0011026082,0.000800548,0.00025084452,0.0012958547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026208695,0.0009351842,0.4729386,0.009142279,0.0012239877,0.0001225928,0.024502445,0.013461109,0.0023014215,0.26214582,0.17226307,0.038342617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009700922,0.0026996315,0.55433816,0.0020568168,0.0022682596,0.000017091574,0.005049633,0.007433585,0.00607179,0.022413636,0.37854332,0.009407169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015060401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010531973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3768775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013616878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085904896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087166589","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6421","title":"Navigating Power and Claiming Justice: Tenant Experiences at Saskatchewan’s Housing Law Tribunal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Law Foundation of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Tribunal; Landlord; Economic Justice; Inequality; Power (physics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Law; Representation (politics); Business; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.045920536984619606,"score_gpt":0.27951020931399434,"score_spread":0.23358967232937472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087166589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981072,0.0009937194,0.0012403617,0.0015651414,0.00051071425,0.00028436346,0.000065530825,0.000068534384,0.014199646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99291724,0.000059487393,0.0024904346,0.003920437,0.00035561481,0.000023791605,0.000004498568,0.000050263407,0.0001782395],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979555,0.000020365549,0.0007719022,0.000644901,0.000119558834,0.00048777636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998813,0.000110955574,0.00047618913,0.0002611222,0.00006113853,0.00027759926],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029371819,0.0002583002,0.000595409,0.00006460636,0.00034269085,0.00021133828,0.00045428553,0.00013793765,0.00024365277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008876792,0.00025459926,0.000097546676,0.00033661426,0.0001858546,0.0006299571,0.00039889928,0.00028412265,0.000095301475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001984795,0.0006499769,0.03692943,0.005171386,0.00048190082,0.00043839333,0.8335774,0.003737602,0.012057564,0.07718716,0.009562155,0.018222256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011417716,0.0033672447,0.04114143,0.0036015362,0.0015493413,0.00014467916,0.15375212,0.020003902,0.06927376,0.0020869665,0.68536454,0.008296779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050940725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094208415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67982525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075525706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038831226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087268678","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6420","title":"Access To Justice, Moral Distance And Changing Demands On Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Solidarity; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Multiculturalism; Relation (database); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.06517805478586225,"score_gpt":0.3489909168456595,"score_spread":0.2838128620597973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087268678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.293205,0.0008340932,0.002966295,0.07898375,0.0017624355,0.0023329307,0.0001596914,0.0004414266,0.6193144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736443,0.00009366375,0.0005150177,0.02319178,0.0012856387,0.000031971915,0.0000032666107,0.000023649034,0.0012106781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828,0.00007212578,0.00022797562,0.00041272608,0.00054172176,0.00046547593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897397,0.00014229373,0.000104462444,0.00018720544,0.00013710545,0.00045493935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030368802,0.00017622177,0.00027276884,0.000024166176,0.00061355985,0.00042926718,0.0009290342,0.00013783027,0.00015429895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031764756,0.00016687582,0.00006853555,0.00076867617,0.00021282984,0.0007265253,0.00037581575,0.00020208463,0.000054856664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068118214,0.0003000145,0.0043405807,0.0019678758,0.0001574159,0.00005632729,0.20924865,0.0035649014,0.00096628617,0.67683667,0.09754026,0.0043398226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017495638,0.000662917,0.014476316,0.0009939919,0.0014946861,0.0000018874404,0.051466398,0.000654433,0.0044532055,0.0028498287,0.91941947,0.0017772892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019756198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032519051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8218792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049333383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060930764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68049985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087291905","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6418","title":"Legal Technology and the Future of Women in Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Promotion (chess); Practice of law; Legal process; Productivity; Public relations; Equal employment opportunity; Work (physics); Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.029694280019558206,"score_gpt":0.3563620919052209,"score_spread":0.3266678118856627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087291905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40054163,0.00020512573,0.00003775226,0.4285871,0.00026654426,0.000369978,0.0000045583183,0.000025577576,0.16996172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948727,0.000029635947,0.0001989677,0.0043971683,0.0002435515,0.000018960658,3.05499e-7,0.0000037945006,0.00023495578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993402,0.000084245854,0.00017572014,0.00009689198,0.00014849952,0.0001544718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942136,0.00019951526,0.00010221976,0.00009377855,0.00011441786,0.00006871269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005987818,0.0000424087,0.00012950887,0.000101511134,0.00008856985,0.00006375758,0.0003318501,0.000060772054,0.00015872653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009108052,0.00003395046,0.000011971146,0.0011078989,0.00044891296,0.0004431177,0.000075493546,0.00019499497,0.000007744749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008085345,0.000023432807,0.00097113725,0.00003260692,0.000007379728,5.321569e-7,0.033430506,0.000008693585,0.00009400325,0.9632639,0.0008111429,0.0012757981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005908599,0.000042905773,0.0029357474,0.000016947844,0.00003250508,4.3446389e-7,0.058121588,0.000016351505,0.0002787068,0.003871522,0.9340134,0.0000790213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019459063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065770495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95939237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033277913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002730476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29416412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087305695","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6422","title":"L’égalité réelle et la mise en œuvre intégrale du principe de Jordan","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06779033886164633,"score_gpt":0.37026656208854286,"score_spread":0.30247622322689655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087305695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38547185,0.00016841269,0.000686897,0.1383761,0.0006938843,0.0004672723,0.000062834726,0.00009115594,0.4739816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725904,0.00026512027,0.0016531299,0.012098961,0.0010172022,0.00002112367,0.000007631265,0.00003904963,0.01230742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714285,0.0009398157,0.00044986056,0.00039695308,0.0005866536,0.00048383776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831796,0.00045861304,0.00019508417,0.00024679,0.00018489575,0.00059668475],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013190991,0.000217787,0.0003345406,0.000075538206,0.00018763292,0.0002669094,0.0010784396,0.00022721915,0.001502252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012009615,0.00024765296,0.00014404954,0.0005962882,0.00038819367,0.0007441236,0.0004024276,0.00024943915,0.00045039435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016532467,0.0004951951,0.003780011,0.0013614136,0.000091366484,0.00004850593,0.16843764,0.000547515,0.000536919,0.7894215,0.02208324,0.013031352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007652634,0.0002191056,0.026760811,0.00032972897,0.00054112537,0.0000031171635,0.012432892,0.000699713,0.0010569441,0.004241629,0.9523774,0.0005722909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00295221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056264945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93029416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010893309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046610148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087416689","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6416","title":"Discrimination and the Private Law in Canada: Reflections on Spence v. BMO Trust Co.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Law; Legislation; Political science; Sexual orientation; Testamentary trust; Multiculturalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.09651350401140332,"score_gpt":0.3755349907071687,"score_spread":0.27902148669576543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087416689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45316267,0.000038903778,0.00021833401,0.11571407,0.00012288138,0.0010016356,0.000034089826,0.0000280463,0.42967936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962297,0.000029296742,0.00009364684,0.0033256703,0.0001262059,0.000027789076,0.0000012236204,0.000004965193,0.00016151369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927115,0.000067300265,0.00014808035,0.00014989226,0.00023277027,0.00013077905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995273,0.0001747351,0.00006276691,0.00010731577,0.00003591227,0.000091976995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019561246,0.0000547367,0.00009904797,0.000020821939,0.00024169378,0.00007398135,0.00032573688,0.00002231463,0.000044307744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002016959,0.00004326331,0.000014195158,0.00027589122,0.00016056845,0.00017086619,0.00006825445,0.00011151586,0.000009383824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007046145,0.000019123665,0.0014001186,0.00003262476,0.0000051879924,0.00000126902,0.008215891,0.00037346903,0.00016226922,0.9883358,0.00081936107,0.0005644499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026471429,0.00016098919,0.33470327,0.00021863871,0.0002820708,0.0000010702687,0.030013626,0.002004025,0.0030521124,0.010106818,0.61610836,0.00070192287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6889803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8275081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011204226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002809973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31309083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087445873","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6431","title":"Caught By Private Law: A Review Of Visitors’ Jurisdiction In Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Appeal; Visitor pattern; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Private law; Sociology; Comparative law; Business","score_opus":0.0639248299723872,"score_gpt":0.41718536120011396,"score_spread":0.35326053122772677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087445873","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003387799,0.94975376,0.000009562188,0.008867,0.00083318015,0.0010755208,0.00012551008,0.000013889831,0.039318178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007680082,0.99646634,0.000104754494,0.0023653598,0.00035231304,0.00007678687,0.000049031947,0.000023908045,0.0004846973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974827,0.0004068952,0.0009764315,0.0002900018,0.00061698275,0.00022699633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978988,0.00048564363,0.00090856693,0.00028114693,0.0002628768,0.00016292497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006593275,0.00019651103,0.001004369,0.00013990022,0.00009678714,0.00006877121,0.00079754123,0.00012944137,0.00051313336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014620627,0.00019530879,0.00010753032,0.0017683462,0.00006818124,0.0005435172,0.00010174426,0.0005097132,0.000030636373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015462301,0.0001812963,0.00003549908,0.2036663,0.0001740968,0.000012610181,0.0023220286,0.0000021785706,0.0000022820284,0.027463075,0.46576178,0.30036336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042554573,0.0000088988745,0.000009249099,0.025503956,0.0005500549,5.710638e-7,0.00013052726,3.1392665e-7,0.0000031160437,0.000011303832,0.9735708,0.00016861604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8337436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5393307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50780904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006755471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010435665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087739257","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6424","title":"The Prospects for Customary Law in Transitional Justice: The Case of Fiji","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Customary international law; Human rights; Sociology; International law; Public international law","score_opus":0.04867721321077983,"score_gpt":0.3404110656836142,"score_spread":0.29173385247283434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087739257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1471979,0.0015826644,0.0013559154,0.112568,0.001612875,0.0050229486,0.0004341176,0.00008368752,0.7301419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998251,0.000057271587,0.00014786361,0.000778394,0.0004542911,0.00005113313,0.0000014306336,0.000008166589,0.00025042324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906796,0.00008213886,0.00024327092,0.00015333142,0.00021721877,0.00023608953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987572,0.0008294754,0.00009084029,0.00011997995,0.00013510372,0.000067405585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005320686,0.000082276674,0.00016541619,0.000018926205,0.000615255,0.00005135172,0.00040137183,0.000051271418,0.000036027795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031482536,0.000052256502,0.000070377384,0.00027600504,0.00032718535,0.00011997336,0.00006184039,0.00010596489,0.0000046726195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011676814,0.00016705859,0.00044427114,0.0011165349,0.00012630763,0.00014663408,0.17147042,0.0012641515,0.00015384432,0.7756657,0.042576596,0.0057008327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035281577,0.0008593085,0.005609532,0.00034468478,0.0017346804,0.000026915215,0.55307,0.0031104435,0.00088616833,0.00920273,0.42072657,0.000900784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009281871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051928717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8510531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020554882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011024259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47321057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310680922","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4563","title":"Reimagining Haj Khalil v. Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Geography; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.04375297097071363,"score_gpt":0.3320573126985284,"score_spread":0.2883043417278148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310680922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05513066,0.00039200496,0.00019688735,0.034719422,0.00094045105,0.00028087787,0.000016253683,0.00006340201,0.90826005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486154,0.000035017223,0.00023029969,0.0033313711,0.0006055143,0.0000040054942,8.694946e-7,0.0000034663087,0.0009279222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988915,0.000036387664,0.00017123793,0.00016051179,0.00047730334,0.00026309508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994416,0.00009193084,0.00006626036,0.000100693665,0.0001705196,0.00012898378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019984809,0.00008086274,0.00015398851,0.000046592522,0.0003934255,0.000055175817,0.00040526298,0.00003276641,0.00013322056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038930037,0.0000721307,0.000030157493,0.00028884187,0.00014791462,0.00021677672,0.00006278671,0.0000941951,0.000020659783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018594504,0.00020477718,0.026972927,0.00006726311,0.00013598146,0.00010933571,0.009966123,0.0007412644,0.0008815378,0.685665,0.21721576,0.057854094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034531715,0.00008358325,0.1898521,0.00018005066,0.00021270623,0.000001440615,0.004831334,0.000014125064,0.00061877497,0.011164846,0.79222196,0.0004737696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7350088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53115577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010880344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010510565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47739944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111152607","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6560","title":"A Former Crown’s Vision for Empowering Survivors of Sexual Violence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Harm; Sexual violence; Criminal justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Charter; Political science; Psychology; Empowerment; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.052996586962715274,"score_gpt":0.3781106619315982,"score_spread":0.32511407496888295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111152607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801271,0.00007933198,0.015512321,0.00062143395,0.00024700278,0.00035138603,0.000022389335,0.000034853678,0.003004185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982139,0.000053551834,0.0009242279,0.00035096356,0.00030147392,0.000020850772,0.0000022503746,0.000013353753,0.000119452896],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878114,0.0000438509,0.00031604336,0.00025991,0.00035846618,0.00024060941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893266,0.00026851505,0.00016449457,0.00015772207,0.00030792574,0.00016865895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003369754,0.00010167708,0.00025149455,0.000120997676,0.00018604293,0.00006416087,0.0004970226,0.000067750465,0.00013544154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007157188,0.00010406376,0.00008815104,0.0005973896,0.00010572038,0.00037828568,0.000117821975,0.00007564437,0.0000151263275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035270164,0.0009383141,0.01429591,0.0066454126,0.00051210553,0.00001517284,0.35380343,0.009718561,0.08935603,0.005272853,0.007120258,0.50879496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010372556,0.0021308938,0.010632035,0.0007451489,0.0046401145,0.0000011208081,0.9261289,0.0054934733,0.01426039,0.00017718479,0.03376721,0.0009862606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008539824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048471745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57232547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028970207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012366087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111204796","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6562","title":"\"Backpack Refugee Rights Advocating\" in Greece – Access to Justice through Legal Empowerment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Empowerment; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.10180932544928184,"score_gpt":0.3932704635690226,"score_spread":0.2914611381197408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111204796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72322035,0.00021048018,0.008013542,0.031985383,0.0021822539,0.0036134573,0.00012279201,0.0003874799,0.23026425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817571,0.00008273323,0.003690376,0.0115633365,0.0019641432,0.000073858624,0.000016270964,0.00005879712,0.0007933579],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650013,0.00035700912,0.0006961513,0.00080860977,0.00093804987,0.0007000696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981285,0.00028057658,0.00027943024,0.00049343007,0.00029906782,0.000519033],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007434757,0.00030708904,0.00043313348,0.00020508983,0.0004422624,0.0005651186,0.002112168,0.00014720848,0.00036099073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018330121,0.0003160228,0.00008628989,0.0014579708,0.00016327728,0.0026251585,0.00086750975,0.0004315671,0.0007116963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01100616,0.0033801896,0.0046916646,0.015026383,0.00048589788,0.0017432821,0.40903047,0.017937168,0.02706694,0.12357403,0.32703295,0.05902487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016449754,0.0012173038,0.014289378,0.0011037703,0.0015903836,0.000006919981,0.02243942,0.00030501705,0.00820206,0.00064278307,0.9470048,0.0015531926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007300955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030928615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6199719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018109218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030113012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112042609","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6563","title":"Making Time for Critique: Canadian ‘Right to Shelter’ Debates in a Chrono-Political Frame","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Politics; Sociology; Expansive; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06046793786869481,"score_gpt":0.38830300266020473,"score_spread":0.3278350647915099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112042609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81216806,0.00021241613,0.013446124,0.0860895,0.00069917284,0.002455129,0.00020780368,0.0001767569,0.084545024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987592,0.0000045586944,0.0013572207,0.009992358,0.00066414435,0.000069866124,0.0000041218345,0.000019902245,0.00029582725],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843454,0.00006871661,0.00029164087,0.00033057717,0.00025126015,0.00062323944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998631,0.00030096568,0.000043270702,0.00015015616,0.00020762224,0.0006669865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026692008,0.00012752709,0.00027267056,0.00033193716,0.00022355498,0.00019221213,0.0005623151,0.00010800896,0.0008647672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001352744,0.00014035993,0.00009195292,0.0007913222,0.00007392095,0.0002736402,0.000079229016,0.00013408477,0.00017639661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002514034,0.0013706959,0.024331497,0.0053079356,0.000805714,0.00058336917,0.5041155,0.016335303,0.010811079,0.17275245,0.14728037,0.11379201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016113712,0.001387909,0.011986905,0.0014572217,0.0041764798,0.000006434355,0.36343625,0.01860631,0.00565662,0.0018621273,0.5871057,0.0027066434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16341352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34605503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43982536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002581987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005471709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9468594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112230220","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6565","title":"Litigating in the Time of Coronavirus: Mental Health Tribunals’ Response to COVID-19","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Harm; Pandemic; Economic Justice; Criminology; Addiction; Psychiatry; Population; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.21238391608874727,"score_gpt":0.5180733425135365,"score_spread":0.30568942642478925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112230220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62413186,0.0001133194,0.00015742861,0.37183908,0.00013077169,0.0019244482,0.00013342324,0.000033586246,0.0015360871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8055643,0.000016975137,0.00087380956,0.19284596,0.0003198961,0.00009539124,0.000012837251,0.000021447036,0.00024941005],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950878,0.0025004307,0.0010030274,0.00032131813,0.00063689577,0.0004505124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922824,0.006124288,0.00041551024,0.00037487797,0.00010960902,0.0006933078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051017827,0.00014508243,0.00048517852,0.00011505024,0.00022332596,0.000015746778,0.0008008894,0.00010817559,0.001895603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023618896,0.00011298057,0.000055657452,0.0006705253,0.00008450831,0.00020713605,0.000341891,0.000566904,0.00041516358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020683425,0.00086592557,0.03676292,0.010273672,0.00008533247,0.000040876334,0.6460866,0.00047175525,0.01239981,0.0014769314,0.26697415,0.0038786032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032798497,0.0023692898,0.068706945,0.0018876655,0.00013576326,0.0000023108341,0.103097856,0.0004104142,0.00059854035,0.00018098245,0.81892025,0.0004101557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013475668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008303287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55194604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015475383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012023606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112273460","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6561","title":"The 2010 Amendments and Hryniak v Mauldin: The Perspective of the Lawyers Who Have Lived Them","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Perception; Psychology; History; Art","score_opus":0.12529564303135415,"score_gpt":0.399644406971222,"score_spread":0.27434876393986785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112273460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10668098,0.00016054054,0.000043440887,0.6364036,0.00061375875,0.0008362482,0.000018185396,0.000019990273,0.25522327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896516,0.00010330613,0.000066977336,0.005701137,0.00027534278,0.00001828705,2.968498e-7,0.000008402046,0.004174628],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989038,0.00021469823,0.00019232754,0.00015078823,0.00038035156,0.00015803854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983601,0.0007432787,0.00023309041,0.00022538847,0.00036254013,0.000075601594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000528645,0.00007733093,0.00010237606,0.000019591474,0.0007052216,0.00023968729,0.00078844884,0.000045532415,0.00019678168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020316774,0.000043077052,0.00004198859,0.0004298165,0.0004966716,0.00047150985,0.00017568587,0.0002779248,0.000019713934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002903845,0.00015854664,0.0068436987,0.00007274965,0.00021621243,8.930832e-7,0.43693796,0.000097724245,0.001192691,0.42489615,0.12667412,0.002618879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041065965,0.00008884713,0.047244813,0.00006848214,0.00034527862,9.5164154e-7,0.4085888,0.0001554721,0.002059468,0.0036060251,0.53720796,0.00022325698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033609704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048947235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88297063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004332445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034005402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54240656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113038015","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6564","title":"Effectuating Change: A Tool Box of Strategies for Reducing the Unnecessary Use of Administrative Court Orders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fulbright Canada; Law Foundation of British Columbia; University of Arizona","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Alienation; Indigenous; Political science; Economic Justice; Interim; Autonomy; Criminal justice; Witness; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.22561869347402994,"score_gpt":0.4139003082026126,"score_spread":0.18828161472858265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113038015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868609,0.000098696124,0.008033264,0.0024341163,0.00016644195,0.00093856564,0.000050250354,0.000024624296,0.0013931701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784976,0.000037268695,0.0013395092,0.00035929936,0.00029773888,0.000067634865,0.0000029713804,0.00001169739,0.000034124565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987498,0.00012661966,0.00036357914,0.00020949698,0.0003504549,0.00020006561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976522,0.0013348146,0.0003436562,0.00017013891,0.000425689,0.00007354496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004345159,0.00011210855,0.0002984255,0.000087368164,0.00022458832,0.00011514739,0.0004375162,0.00006076497,0.00006489027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017664583,0.00009371965,0.00012936421,0.00070553983,0.00022298489,0.0006055988,0.00008249047,0.00010194388,0.0000016333775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023029663,0.00058831094,0.0030904757,0.006334211,0.0009686635,0.00001032879,0.83114153,0.020109503,0.024060247,0.018779682,0.006459661,0.08615442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042458187,0.00090076047,0.0018299693,0.00048899685,0.0032626141,5.986801e-7,0.9761138,0.0048608896,0.008517378,0.00012476253,0.0031550704,0.00032060372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008605777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016204466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14497225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021604123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034590365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121174463","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4363","title":"LAWYERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE FAIRNESS OF JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Psychology; Helpfulness; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06152644705459672,"score_gpt":0.4113544472456721,"score_spread":0.3498280001910754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121174463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86394364,0.000025505882,0.0003614227,0.015338453,0.0012263253,0.0005254598,0.00003990823,0.000030642714,0.11850862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99671316,0.0000068516383,0.0009207665,0.0006837606,0.00040907811,0.000020374955,0.0000013110814,0.000009194667,0.0012354868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859715,0.00018677354,0.00034527184,0.0001286733,0.0005076983,0.00023442278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983445,0.00031966303,0.00027585035,0.0003182066,0.0006012873,0.00014051862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006761786,0.00007682185,0.00016422519,0.00012581103,0.00023078306,0.000047911806,0.00064165477,0.00006981532,0.0005516172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019127378,0.00006786174,0.000060586128,0.0012707334,0.00017380853,0.0008213871,0.00012713214,0.000156435,0.000040266405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019990682,0.0021901126,0.42017242,0.0004178135,0.00020599396,4.421446e-7,0.30514458,0.00021557152,0.019403787,0.19933158,0.050362565,0.0023552233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019299885,0.000030093399,0.8909233,0.00012018699,0.00024663244,4.170101e-7,0.024967005,0.000005651593,0.0045679044,0.00019255905,0.078590825,0.00016239878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045780553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008607431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4707509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059364073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048615845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6920681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121435143","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4318","title":"SEX WORK, LAW, AND VIOLENCE: BEDFORD V. CANADA AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEX WORKERS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex work; Sex workers; Human rights; Political science; Law; Work (physics); Criminology; Sociology; Humanities; Engineering; Demography; Biology; Philosophy; Virology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","score_opus":0.013696655953237758,"score_gpt":0.2823445126062222,"score_spread":0.2686478566529844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121435143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93149203,0.0005602122,0.0000030484523,0.000818822,0.00013980911,0.0004108437,0.0000011232939,0.000014451935,0.066559665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966549,0.00007624197,0.00007960641,0.00032768212,0.00014074479,0.000013501738,6.625692e-7,0.000008339461,0.0026983111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886125,0.00012283778,0.00023618368,0.00018739804,0.00034653323,0.00024580376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912715,0.00033117246,0.00012008302,0.00017905899,0.00009911509,0.00014340188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003555789,0.00010928946,0.00024375237,0.000042951757,0.000439631,0.0001093431,0.0004008772,0.00009991131,0.00017456047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004971256,0.00007372734,0.000024810626,0.00024288105,0.0008039538,0.0001816062,0.00012585768,0.0001444177,0.000003767639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000592269,0.00036648207,0.39119804,0.0010500406,0.0012500772,0.00004532825,0.38817143,0.00078389357,0.000540276,0.09619673,0.07192459,0.04788081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009345548,0.00045718328,0.3605072,0.0054222103,0.002729036,0.000008810316,0.2880514,0.00024896974,0.009220854,0.056075078,0.2648705,0.0030632485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84585726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21034229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.635515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025624318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091640366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8040669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121872600","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4504","title":"Reinventing Regulation/Reinventing Accountability: Judicial Review in New Governance Regimes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Political science; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Humanities; Law; Sociology; Management; Social science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03608679849214246,"score_gpt":0.2947580506306005,"score_spread":0.25867125213845804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121872600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26354885,0.000704657,0.00029859968,0.016484443,0.0023701214,0.0015583226,0.0000059975628,0.00017037812,0.71485865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338155,0.00010844672,0.0018945343,0.05621878,0.0043858443,0.000038835864,0.000036782243,0.000059222457,0.0034420702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981449,0.000013357034,0.0006830569,0.0003643809,0.0005249266,0.00026934576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987236,0.00006470003,0.0005628359,0.00033006902,0.00028725696,0.00003153831],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006909889,0.00018453962,0.00029314047,0.00018688825,0.00009500325,0.0002572441,0.0006306425,0.00007526731,0.0017288952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010799749,0.00019146368,0.00009826485,0.00063733215,0.000057189445,0.0024116028,0.00027519258,0.0002700601,0.00027709335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011542524,0.00020197462,0.024864754,0.003191532,0.000040210987,0.00000804709,0.0000983733,0.00017946507,0.0068053263,0.8893594,0.070502825,0.0046326257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016531707,0.000027901384,0.21484712,0.005988848,0.00043538032,0.000005092881,0.0000861967,0.0052935174,0.0035023848,0.023221929,0.7439471,0.0009913653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016864383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009347293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8661375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003842177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111296875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122075567","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4847","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND ABUSES OF CONTRACT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Boilerplate text; Economic Justice; Political science; Enforcement; Democracy; Law; Normative; Law and economics; Rule of law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.09363396427763256,"score_gpt":0.4105117213857557,"score_spread":0.31687775710812316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122075567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6538946,0.00010351149,0.00018850686,0.0028730908,0.0006678371,0.00044146174,0.000038114104,0.000028418834,0.34176445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505144,0.00013362305,0.0002871402,0.0016655795,0.00053554535,0.0000069933785,8.927764e-7,0.000017455783,0.002301351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860805,0.000080237594,0.00031526768,0.0002581652,0.00048035674,0.0002579016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824536,0.00036244723,0.00033118107,0.0003742099,0.0004417389,0.00024508507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005741877,0.0001233039,0.00025947846,0.00012229905,0.0004003886,0.0006192696,0.0017655117,0.00006394928,0.00029628407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028707809,0.00012145928,0.000051414492,0.00009457329,0.00028313452,0.0014153568,0.00040446056,0.00011260879,0.00005437124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025190113,0.0011770006,0.10576361,0.002318049,0.00060121005,0.00015030429,0.027190344,0.0007717463,0.027704421,0.75282234,0.03575793,0.04322402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083888875,0.00019759084,0.7939328,0.00047099695,0.00063913455,0.0000012492882,0.0007327419,0.00007517918,0.0061928993,0.00033935794,0.19615567,0.0004234653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020298758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076134934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.752483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028350223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011860249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59716314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122173365","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4537","title":"Listening to Their Voices: Women Prisoners and Access to Justice in Manitoba","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Active listening; Economic Justice; Legislature; Accountability; Political science; Compliance (psychology); Law; State (computer science); Public administration; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06436131248664645,"score_gpt":0.3429993511478677,"score_spread":0.2786380386612213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122173365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852444,0.00009164653,0.0009866985,0.001086512,0.00043106105,0.00058356125,0.00001142181,0.000060853028,0.011503859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949388,0.0001985961,0.00084672344,0.002372602,0.0005504336,0.00012630472,0.0000016615485,0.000029316448,0.0009355461],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764186,0.00014184586,0.00045815264,0.0005491153,0.000544719,0.0006643202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982534,0.0004199596,0.00014314488,0.00034650444,0.00028580124,0.0005511739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000665539,0.00023192681,0.0004353934,0.00074811646,0.00056104414,0.0003619771,0.0011078523,0.00011765873,0.00013529188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009232773,0.00023563953,0.000070207534,0.0020596064,0.00013891424,0.00091905816,0.0005135818,0.00021745129,0.000076639895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011870262,0.0006948001,0.04817285,0.0012946174,0.00024328344,0.00018883846,0.83379924,0.015310035,0.0024410165,0.00067603984,0.008686127,0.08730609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005344841,0.0003329878,0.06284611,0.000418532,0.0010091262,0.000009925225,0.8893327,0.00033398258,0.0006395197,0.000045114102,0.04364143,0.0008560796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023280358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040971782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08645001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029120452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002244914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122188266","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4419","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR ALL: TOWARDS AN “EXPANSIVE VISION” OF JUSTICE AND TECHNOLOGY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Economic Justice; Deliverable; Software deployment; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.07498148193957802,"score_gpt":0.4503946477101648,"score_spread":0.3754131657705868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122188266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59743404,0.00022287547,0.0109656835,0.2958251,0.003355094,0.006018414,0.00016744272,0.0002968239,0.08571456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97312075,0.00006922212,0.01595746,0.008143539,0.00064783514,0.00035140346,0.000013151917,0.000040973297,0.0016556511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980182,0.00011965822,0.0005349712,0.00043717332,0.00045651587,0.00043347618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958128,0.00076490664,0.0003491929,0.00043634555,0.002298506,0.0003382649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073502556,0.00018556009,0.00033233283,0.0006061725,0.00038363764,0.0005164847,0.0012301793,0.0002231529,0.0005064008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006390215,0.00018995072,0.00004085995,0.0015589707,0.00028537388,0.0032407208,0.00030685455,0.00025788872,0.000059875372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081990793,0.0023779543,0.003107518,0.0048654387,0.00043256473,0.000007554972,0.10957602,0.00085119146,0.03364405,0.38069487,0.30326512,0.16035782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020433394,0.001770111,0.05004531,0.0004772178,0.0051632477,0.000008487166,0.12399587,0.00065553165,0.014139332,0.012327501,0.7877972,0.0015768359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049923365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007251681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4845321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006900226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007936989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7745966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122262214","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4521","title":"PROCESS MATTERS - EMPIRICALLY EVALUATING ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS IN THE HEALTH SECTOR: THE QUESTIONABLE NEUTRALITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PROCESS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4683178040571181,"score_gpt":0.6010075371042747,"score_spread":0.1326897330471566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122262214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85901463,0.00015026414,0.00021052311,0.13116296,0.00028082138,0.0036601806,0.00013621761,0.00003400677,0.005350381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98462355,0.0000067020565,0.00023227402,0.01411069,0.000331807,0.00050453446,0.000021543725,0.000019950585,0.00014892027],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99241704,0.0035201882,0.0015717396,0.00045056344,0.0013982122,0.0006422336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916307,0.005058748,0.001225699,0.00054520345,0.001193887,0.00034576308],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01044668,0.00025981446,0.0006857524,0.00011624275,0.00032859566,0.000044250566,0.0012202286,0.0001772669,0.00040981953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010401348,0.00015736949,0.00007718231,0.0009466926,0.00030522572,0.0005533746,0.00012833074,0.0011078402,0.000033414224],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011455578,0.004050533,0.21839245,0.021430127,0.00032796463,0.000038677525,0.64188343,0.002267679,0.0002441333,0.008932217,0.08924382,0.0017333592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006191614,0.008556235,0.33049837,0.0048197205,0.00081931095,0.00001860623,0.61608815,0.0010762387,0.0015387059,0.012604431,0.016799895,0.0009887342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011193195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005284065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12560894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016332767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005161345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99793446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122308799","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4360","title":"THE “NAKED FACE” OF SECULAR EXCLUSION: BILL 94 AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF BELIEF","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02899525982252284,"score_gpt":0.3223177436575149,"score_spread":0.2933224838349921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122308799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5480852,0.0040932717,0.0061387443,0.016675524,0.0009822514,0.0017710732,0.000080475686,0.00003893118,0.4221345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834025,0.00018138274,0.0002385819,0.0002912653,0.00019242357,0.0000060276548,0.000001146888,0.000004352396,0.0007445408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990314,0.00014886074,0.00022576538,0.00007048115,0.00035247838,0.00017097425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987092,0.00066988164,0.000199087,0.00016208066,0.00018674332,0.000072976305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007360323,0.00005968005,0.00014385332,0.000029405875,0.00029402715,0.00002114027,0.00034284283,0.00004221908,0.000039648537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006655884,0.00003284011,0.000036999252,0.00021304941,0.0015673706,0.00017338022,0.00014858805,0.000054420245,0.000002375536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047088513,0.000028058976,0.0027168663,0.000039044666,0.000022324759,8.941605e-8,0.0050288276,0.000070496026,0.00014864176,0.99062234,0.00042371533,0.00085249444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015198459,0.00013977685,0.0541207,0.0002425347,0.00072016165,0.0000031361403,0.016602974,0.00014559334,0.004656701,0.005199272,0.9162544,0.00039487876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015605742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005843883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015887086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023812678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5775042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122347404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4372","title":"OPPORTUNITY LOST: THE SUPREME COURT MISSES A HISTORIC CHANCE TO CONSIDER QUESTION OF PUBLIC INTEREST STANDING FOR ANIMAL INTERESTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Humanities; Intervention (counseling); Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.2804840550246441,"score_gpt":0.4300931352395599,"score_spread":0.1496090802149158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122347404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426143,0.00030491478,0.008009568,0.028755175,0.0006577998,0.0017101087,0.00010892541,0.0000580032,0.017781198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762124,0.000016983622,0.0006637032,0.00042842055,0.0004439263,0.000065099885,0.0000025932636,0.000013127433,0.0007448923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888086,0.00010289096,0.0002855709,0.00015979657,0.00024697013,0.00032392683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984774,0.00041126882,0.00019814158,0.00023827836,0.00037898298,0.0002959366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00113455,0.0000974971,0.0001740928,0.000097153534,0.0002268685,0.00008783407,0.00058044586,0.00005906259,0.00018053813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016746864,0.00008245968,0.00005415079,0.00029455245,0.00015258866,0.00053184293,0.00017847885,0.00009555806,0.00001744339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036211556,0.0007260132,0.022296004,0.00065500813,0.00011502035,0.0000012578419,0.031552583,0.000026911997,0.018580122,0.86625046,0.054813195,0.0046213297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046940023,0.00034363818,0.04772454,0.00037164427,0.00029357956,0.00000231319,0.010422065,0.00009472006,0.008090289,0.0010642689,0.9306487,0.0004748698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006943753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014824071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8758355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017332325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023001934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3362608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122700238","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4480","title":"Dizzying Dialogue: Canadian Courts and the Continuing Justification of the Dispossession Of Aboriginal People","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Doctrine; Supreme court; Conciliation; Law; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Arbitration","score_opus":0.03848112590642711,"score_gpt":0.3252010623644886,"score_spread":0.2867199364580615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122700238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98851603,0.0002066234,0.000027617209,0.0015878845,0.00031673186,0.00052981346,0.000016728347,0.000008179021,0.008790416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938047,0.000112501926,0.00015268395,0.00005395237,0.00009925338,0.000015600295,7.080879e-7,0.0000059425925,0.00017890931],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989223,0.00016301707,0.00025772076,0.00013616963,0.00031978727,0.00020101287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889565,0.0002911525,0.0002756415,0.00016939008,0.00027610606,0.00009205119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006329672,0.0000851083,0.00021855168,0.00003943761,0.00033889274,0.00003560832,0.00051831955,0.00005881202,0.000041138574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007228157,0.000049420396,0.000051518622,0.0002226868,0.00062636955,0.00022684751,0.00009388272,0.000096436386,0.0000016157115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027374105,0.00008771555,0.18062504,0.0004355948,0.00010340061,0.0000011591134,0.7456391,0.00006125478,0.002753231,0.06336348,0.00094452564,0.0057117883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004284804,0.000018149218,0.97357297,0.00023981163,0.0003202798,2.6087847e-7,0.019897329,0.000039777402,0.0018061927,0.0003035597,0.0032513975,0.000121805744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42611974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18533252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7929479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056450946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012871163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82953304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123338612","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485","title":"Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fisheries Joint Management Committee","keywords":"Rulemaking; Agency (philosophy); Negotiation; Corporate governance; Political science; Stakeholder; Public administration; Citizen journalism; Democracy; Sociology; Business; Humanities; Management; Public relations; Law; Politics; Economics; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16611613317726218,"score_gpt":0.39197966032717413,"score_spread":0.22586352714991195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123338612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640267,0.000009567582,0.00028981583,0.000027346578,0.000055135148,0.00043442042,0.000005144415,0.000012119604,0.035139732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978496,0.000017330107,0.0017495167,0.00021782001,0.000016964186,0.000035196932,0.0000046778646,0.000015967838,0.00009291431],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866664,0.00007454008,0.00030931438,0.00029781988,0.00034493918,0.00030676174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950284,0.00003692047,0.0001609837,0.00016438379,0.0000049584273,0.00012989134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025259264,0.00015281198,0.00017506235,0.000072375224,0.00011279344,0.00011927105,0.00023902256,0.000050507053,0.0006672406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028721468,0.00015512365,0.000022465521,0.00020897837,0.00017608088,0.0012615592,0.00031016563,0.00010151148,0.00008477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006713559,0.00046527997,0.9791455,0.00015105908,0.000041528892,0.000034989083,0.0053834193,0.00011081014,0.006266045,0.00017311808,0.00005519354,0.008105894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003990125,0.000087984954,0.9921044,0.00010869755,0.000086973654,6.231979e-7,0.0008900899,0.000053867785,0.005726229,0.0002889476,0.00008140852,0.00017174972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025901702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008326564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03504682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015466215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075384855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7305817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123523432","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4498","title":"NEITHER FISH NOR FOWL: ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES IN THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Adjudication; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Accountability; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Politics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.10596558408195621,"score_gpt":0.31663987585797604,"score_spread":0.21067429177601982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123523432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7256456,0.00016181967,0.00035203923,0.006323654,0.0003530663,0.00048625178,0.0005287702,0.000018305333,0.26613048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965869,0.000019389241,0.0003207422,0.0016649411,0.00015129536,0.00007168214,0.0000048862867,0.000011037412,0.0011690792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894434,0.000017274639,0.00041786255,0.0003079235,0.00008048502,0.0002321397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924976,0.00017358163,0.00020264467,0.00024703797,0.00006704104,0.000059931263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002988449,0.00015305684,0.0002852586,0.00010524802,0.0001004695,0.00012419802,0.0005760846,0.000060569026,0.00024619795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023024218,0.00012717927,0.00006745325,0.00023610452,0.00018330885,0.00035144118,0.000112315,0.00027633813,0.00014490105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062495953,0.0011990365,0.30209038,0.000292904,0.0003542842,0.000082858765,0.024610694,0.00044891878,0.0005390811,0.6509141,0.013952839,0.004889986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010289503,0.00035586068,0.86332,0.000048878326,0.000059656184,0.000008837767,0.0012083404,0.00042895315,0.0009521411,0.05767652,0.07429979,0.0006120524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033588693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017228805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5932375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023259392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078823985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51862204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123586893","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4566","title":"India Sinking: Threats to the Right to Food, Food Security & Development, in an Era of Economic Growth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foundation for Research, Science and Technology","keywords":"Food security; Right to food; Poverty; Development economics; Economic growth; State (computer science); Agriculture; Political science; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.05217552426609419,"score_gpt":0.3305887104590601,"score_spread":0.2784131861929659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123586893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96606666,0.00003391626,0.00011947729,0.0022877364,0.00022096036,0.000808587,0.000013185504,0.00002926675,0.03042021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995773,0.000007724487,0.0023016816,0.0014056922,0.00022060344,0.000026238344,0.000004301516,0.00001241837,0.00024831336],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981704,0.00011068413,0.00049257773,0.00037842695,0.0004113269,0.00043662114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990131,0.00010616626,0.00014382077,0.00030871524,0.00013562536,0.0002925697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008104316,0.00017829733,0.00031274083,0.00024352383,0.000279392,0.00016551247,0.0011489965,0.000100130375,0.00025214537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009027319,0.0001388702,0.00004315354,0.00041194694,0.00006754953,0.00040729955,0.00016921287,0.00017040201,0.00016041679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061873207,0.0011500015,0.041412383,0.00022972451,0.00018724099,0.00001545719,0.6602412,0.0012001743,0.00029169646,0.2610682,0.013202058,0.020383133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013648435,0.001560145,0.722108,0.0005994578,0.00013320499,0.0000017198272,0.0032945543,0.000010722243,0.012176445,0.05889799,0.19834867,0.0015042664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002954963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017391557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021734805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005601385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9704897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123808924","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5007","title":"DESIGNING ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Administration of justice; Administrative law; Adaptation (eye); Sociology; Law; Geography; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.24663566810625512,"score_gpt":0.5011033493798046,"score_spread":0.25446768127354946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123808924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02824825,0.000027441354,0.0026608845,0.045402512,0.0016822681,0.00046489786,0.000013091344,0.00006185355,0.9214388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98371804,0.000017871651,0.0060526687,0.0015331547,0.0008559917,0.0000255902,0.0000019024803,0.000012621054,0.0077821785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987929,0.00011908756,0.00024761324,0.00021022146,0.00037953255,0.0002506477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979925,0.00051202934,0.00039380143,0.00043210541,0.00049208035,0.00017747321],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008260603,0.000096151605,0.00014226531,0.00010932868,0.0015903322,0.0009744912,0.0010733124,0.000082409766,0.00078697305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077107633,0.00010332515,0.00003717988,0.00022681437,0.0002658332,0.0021930581,0.00011869079,0.00024138391,0.00020864686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040876606,0.00081758056,0.01142072,0.000559392,0.00020626458,0.00004457287,0.11962212,0.00018009821,0.0071635162,0.6786096,0.15938142,0.021585926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006573102,0.0001809535,0.07827299,0.00023737742,0.0010206859,0.0000026945413,0.048977233,0.000039305236,0.009766467,0.0024343417,0.857738,0.0006726287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025703378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064102764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055460107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010783436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124481640","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4365","title":"AGGRESSION AS “ORGANIZED HYPOCRISY?” – HOW THE WAR ON TERRORISM AND HYBRID THREATS CHALLENGE THE NUREMBERG LEGACY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Charter; Humanities; Politics; Aggression; Hypocrisy; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0588312614752559,"score_gpt":0.34743082241199924,"score_spread":0.2885995609367433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124481640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8432062,0.0011296952,0.000021939664,0.030566012,0.0011853583,0.0006027977,0.000007719997,0.000048192487,0.12323208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98860484,0.00021775208,0.000032144915,0.0009946529,0.0016511384,0.000018710503,0.0000017456566,0.000018586916,0.0084604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851227,0.00017579972,0.00015000653,0.00019571747,0.00063586346,0.00033037024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893844,0.0003647561,0.00014610079,0.00027704833,0.0001354312,0.00013821977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057929155,0.00014256101,0.00015473964,0.00005964916,0.0007859511,0.0002056799,0.00076565536,0.000063057574,0.00034460326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021585294,0.00007792849,0.00005458542,0.00006933124,0.00025850246,0.00068338023,0.0001512842,0.00019910872,0.00013471297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029169244,0.00035719466,0.00041511035,0.00006909353,0.00012388236,0.000017172895,0.04842601,0.000008404297,0.00048425474,0.9216927,0.02142102,0.006693438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025180953,0.00060741435,0.043939933,0.0013568805,0.0010832533,0.000032696335,0.015288487,0.00006179463,0.02163065,0.10673716,0.8053181,0.0014255213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045333977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002178913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8149556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004823186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006521014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60449797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124638337","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4367","title":"TURNING THE SPOTLIGHT ON CLASS REPRESENTATIVES -EMPIRICAL INSIGHTS FROM DOWN UNDER","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Accounting Education and Careers","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Monash University; Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Genealogy; Data science; Political science; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05512572733748845,"score_gpt":0.3292749757039268,"score_spread":0.27414924836643834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124638337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8815783,0.00014438092,0.0003089863,0.008219474,0.0014905877,0.00029252807,0.0000031130373,0.00008183691,0.10788075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741997,0.0000029036612,0.00008172993,0.021425862,0.003617852,0.00002164151,0.000014866075,0.000032172582,0.0006032436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867815,0.000030631192,0.00027400392,0.00027088815,0.00045420096,0.0002921506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877733,0.00036317785,0.00024723326,0.00041263815,0.00016249303,0.000037151363],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022316181,0.00018207169,0.00019316297,0.00020448503,0.00019742649,0.00035676546,0.00066032447,0.000076614124,0.00060059974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038763994,0.00012729675,0.000077092845,0.0004868666,0.00008441724,0.001394439,0.00029187932,0.00022214824,0.00081839313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070491456,0.0012428735,0.27803954,0.000509309,0.0004328661,0.000009188133,0.011752007,0.0039105364,0.008372637,0.08595485,0.60458916,0.004482085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041457568,0.000012079726,0.77388793,0.00012606377,0.0003434811,5.546563e-7,0.006484399,0.00031386246,0.001421897,0.0013787645,0.21525082,0.0003655931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037966596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002373912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49584836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037514033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030895215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125584685","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4544","title":"On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Coherentism; Normative; Generality; Epistemology; Morality; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Liberalism; Reflective equilibrium; Philosophy; Law; Foundationalism; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.11873980687484718,"score_gpt":0.3390400621543505,"score_spread":0.2203002552795033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125584685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5480392,0.00010990819,0.000047185087,0.026301306,0.00067057787,0.0006757937,0.000034469307,0.000037705835,0.42408386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405335,0.00003443263,0.0000897575,0.053172134,0.0007379725,0.00004219003,0.0000038910543,0.000034446206,0.0053516743],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827117,0.0001406086,0.0004582216,0.00035137762,0.00040768198,0.00037096874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983931,0.00072412344,0.00016898694,0.00043936764,0.0001870815,0.000087338354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005147251,0.00021828034,0.00035169968,0.0001651807,0.000259928,0.00012620597,0.00073643756,0.00009237779,0.00042934399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036826447,0.00016250391,0.00011234991,0.00013482405,0.0002598533,0.0003491551,0.00014513044,0.00041533393,0.000113141235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005921531,0.00039851727,0.0020738472,0.0003440335,0.00018684831,0.00019060944,0.474989,0.00016259326,0.00089356484,0.24355026,0.27631605,0.00030251042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023917425,0.0026440513,0.01723716,0.0013358317,0.0008998599,0.0000348928,0.06100668,0.00021440384,0.0058372207,0.08032252,0.8261993,0.0018763375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009212512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002572414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54988325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004878155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009969817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66267174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125781662","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4564","title":"Learning to Act Like a Lawyer: A Model Code of Professional Responsibility for Law Students","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Ethical code; Practice of law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09656630499813047,"score_gpt":0.4906529854882204,"score_spread":0.39408668049008994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125781662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991441,0.00001520778,0.0023082357,0.03816298,0.0006155473,0.00180796,0.00004999982,0.000070616086,0.05782536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98242134,0.0000023972284,0.0057340926,0.004232248,0.00014373127,0.000046321904,0.000004369913,0.0000089923615,0.007406514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841815,0.00018123628,0.0003589218,0.0002347615,0.00057806075,0.00022884784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981432,0.0005951561,0.00021560871,0.00021221534,0.0006825016,0.00015131103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016713006,0.00008908038,0.00018462064,0.00013777669,0.00034014977,0.00012344624,0.0006170917,0.000084845204,0.0000996774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002966965,0.000090117006,0.00005248934,0.0005479278,0.00007655768,0.00073322596,0.00008766668,0.00021926039,0.000015553811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007440848,0.006100771,0.013938829,0.00067178207,0.00019350201,0.0000029704916,0.35385913,0.03511576,0.023973618,0.47220874,0.0707706,0.015723463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031006432,0.0019477125,0.12595151,0.0008045917,0.0007420301,0.0000012533532,0.041834645,0.004238205,0.0074928515,0.01578748,0.7968003,0.0012987636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006819082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006881993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7260297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075294614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090618775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36748648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175488539","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7192","title":"Civil Revolution: User Experiences with British Columbia’s Online Court","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Online dispute resolution; Exploratory research; Dispute resolution; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Law; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.023583093107586682,"score_gpt":0.25257431049699947,"score_spread":0.22899121738941278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175488539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8798659,0.00018094126,0.00061342504,0.002228485,0.0009615121,0.0006167768,0.00006397152,0.00020876418,0.11526023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98727316,0.0000082579345,0.00022688684,0.00310132,0.0007537182,0.00018867497,0.000041516032,0.000030385703,0.008376098],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985557,0.000015073474,0.00027548894,0.00031803918,0.0005593593,0.0002763015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926805,0.00002577507,0.00021219964,0.00025392833,0.00020649712,0.000033555836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016560726,0.00010776684,0.00020921176,0.00013138329,0.00049319863,0.00071572704,0.00058413926,0.000031255116,0.0073574386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063974425,0.0001503974,0.000060935665,0.00080461433,0.000088475,0.0010944039,0.0004901286,0.00016858909,0.000049643993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001858178,0.0012131036,0.02884003,0.00049438217,0.00010638833,0.000078577476,0.0005886038,0.0028721567,0.00011763245,0.0023990981,0.95973706,0.0033671418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057597377,0.00005864234,0.06638191,0.00009080388,0.00020052149,0.000019211711,0.014617063,0.00090080773,0.0000033154406,0.000037600617,0.91680855,0.00030563082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010925366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024260597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10740724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006202116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007628936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99566096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W318490112","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4501","title":"Agency Design in the European Union","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); European union; Accountability; Position (finance); Political science; Through-the-lens metering; State (computer science); Law and economics; Public administration; Member state; Member states; Law; Business; Lens (geology); Economics; Sociology; Engineering; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.07207854166794878,"score_gpt":0.348185847833609,"score_spread":0.27610730616566026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W318490112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08264765,0.000027529686,0.00057930336,0.002554252,0.00042880842,0.00023318852,0.0000021743847,0.00002065644,0.91350645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638736,0.000037535738,0.0005566447,0.0006560229,0.00049305666,0.000004183006,5.223538e-7,0.000009020391,0.0018556318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850744,0.00076144474,0.00015481094,0.00012389926,0.00030230454,0.00015010136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940753,0.00025571891,0.00005804285,0.00014587425,0.000092020964,0.00004083866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027400407,0.00006063985,0.00007170329,0.000068105604,0.00015884596,0.00008610183,0.0008966322,0.000019577963,0.0001447387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070240063,0.00004576731,0.000026852145,0.00021689059,0.00013181758,0.00020993635,0.0000990949,0.00015415715,0.00017093317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010252854,0.0007076953,0.020024545,0.00013008795,0.00008148444,0.00013989642,0.1445228,0.0005500743,0.014612875,0.65683585,0.08680438,0.07548777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000261806,0.00007684241,0.5706175,0.00006181665,0.00005183871,0.0000010506342,0.0025925213,0.000019304183,0.0004072523,0.0012723408,0.4244285,0.00020925536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061039056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087405863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91373974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000109687435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037066115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21970572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196881958","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6425","title":"Where The Sidewalk Ends: The Governance Of Waterfront Toronto’s Sidewalk Labs Deal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Accountability; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Corporation; General partnership; Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Municipal corporation; Local government; Public relations; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.05027003628671882,"score_gpt":0.34152951858278197,"score_spread":0.29125948229606313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196881958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24112527,0.0071669156,0.0000649415,0.19227496,0.0009195689,0.0014098991,0.00016257941,0.00013555534,0.5567403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907663,0.0004349523,0.00012491012,0.0034667973,0.0013697959,0.000019839012,7.7180033e-7,0.00001769824,0.0037989216],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981765,0.00021429405,0.00034620342,0.0002316931,0.0006670352,0.00036427026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987205,0.0004032985,0.00023366483,0.00031942318,0.0001578817,0.0001651968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047235898,0.00015038074,0.00026400556,0.0000096488975,0.00026965083,0.00013182346,0.0016448038,0.00008445459,0.000958333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043159127,0.00008860749,0.00010160171,0.00021212411,0.00031587898,0.00049522397,0.00031208215,0.00016477496,0.00008673609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065702584,0.00021726252,0.0077744485,0.0010000515,0.00032723707,0.00002535859,0.5578637,0.0006734967,0.0061492417,0.10667911,0.29325137,0.025381673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027812753,0.00014373021,0.012815105,0.000110056426,0.00020311179,5.8351156e-7,0.012386627,0.00004204718,0.0065590814,0.00033861698,0.9668968,0.0002261525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05901607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030797927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74964106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006791605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020623689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233108988","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4886","title":"SPLITTING TWAIL?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Temporalities; Decolonization; Argument (complex analysis); International relations; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08521279986176315,"score_gpt":0.4090848203018213,"score_spread":0.32387202044005814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233108988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4648608,0.000006895439,0.000073671516,0.0013777919,0.00050864887,0.00013187282,0.000004531201,0.000023971073,0.5330118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97263724,0.0000026707896,0.000467334,0.00030739556,0.0010509234,0.0000053720414,7.248884e-7,0.000008367143,0.025519991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990765,0.000030173578,0.00015626327,0.00015780216,0.00037748658,0.0002017802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991594,0.000087676664,0.00017165754,0.00028641263,0.00019303514,0.00010179502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037482753,0.00006557923,0.00011266466,0.00006025844,0.0009710616,0.00040465733,0.0012232759,0.00005153563,0.0007129158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004488251,0.00006210489,0.000047348556,0.000020444386,0.00019448956,0.00059293717,0.00017263208,0.00007589321,0.00021785015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001970621,0.000024669765,0.0023385857,0.000026844162,0.000014728928,0.0000062261643,0.0022678154,0.0000109285365,0.00013453935,0.9930872,0.0014165513,0.00065225165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089936575,0.00012083307,0.37622583,0.0004655957,0.00029037998,0.0000015567417,0.0009392263,0.00008945544,0.005042493,0.09989777,0.51527774,0.0007497516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029853547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011652441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8931894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003731517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010099492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7805928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238151543","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5013","title":"THE INTERNET AS A SITE OF LEGAL EDUCATION AND COLLABORATION ACROSS CONTINENTS AND TIME ZONES: USING ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AS A TOOL FOR STUDENT LEARNING","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Mainstream; Dispute resolution; Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Aside; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public relations; The Internet; Legal education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02961345049684483,"score_gpt":0.3604436869340267,"score_spread":0.33083023643718185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238151543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762339,0.00015811084,0.021869425,0.0006114641,0.0002471444,0.0004876582,0.000008318551,0.000013362101,0.00037059336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398035,0.00004033232,0.0030505208,0.00013883278,0.00012480597,0.000013832017,0.0000042080724,0.000009117016,0.002638014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909824,0.000053024647,0.00025446858,0.00024446007,0.00019537102,0.00015442516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988355,0.00014497379,0.00029142902,0.0002919056,0.0003858853,0.000050298895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037820672,0.00009587141,0.00015584243,0.00003870594,0.00037800538,0.00091499,0.00053089845,0.000043256594,0.000002857192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089477067,0.00007268449,0.000022888284,0.00007741524,0.00014177288,0.0011339996,0.00055134995,0.00006333339,0.0000031712493],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068794126,0.0036934724,0.06123238,0.0033089218,0.0010064633,0.000015106741,0.19939789,0.0046486617,0.26838022,0.0560257,0.019893484,0.3755183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032363555,0.002790844,0.10807921,0.0014689843,0.0004307727,0.00004321228,0.004181617,0.813796,0.017205704,0.0008342362,0.04705933,0.0008737162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049609895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085189444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80914736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029338895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013439743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.882327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239905040","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4415","title":"LOST AND FOUND","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Art, Technology, and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Humanities; Art; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.038731503783211836,"score_gpt":0.2651119802642709,"score_spread":0.22638047648105908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239905040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49559617,0.00040333133,0.000042076827,0.002898039,0.00041062938,0.0006980091,0.00003045767,0.000117468924,0.4998038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760178,0.000021485213,0.00017634321,0.0014729399,0.00054441387,0.00003311341,0.0000033643669,0.000018432012,0.021712143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938047,0.000010313578,0.00015241062,0.00016616161,0.00011332428,0.00017733657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995186,0.000033918233,0.00005976798,0.00019351032,0.0001241876,0.00007007054],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000049412607,0.00010693369,0.0001483336,0.00007364009,0.00012604202,0.00019506892,0.00027497354,0.00006092226,0.0038727138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000449299,0.00008669465,0.000027139182,0.000023678995,0.00023005971,0.00044568928,0.00015223098,0.00010421452,0.00056871545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078761026,0.000262799,0.0031402216,0.0008430546,0.00020688,0.000013434955,0.054814167,0.00001794321,0.0023080918,0.3301877,0.59307295,0.015053969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052098976,0.00026017954,0.015272384,0.00013194236,0.00027496892,0.000006412373,0.014073253,0.00006643067,0.00094498246,0.008169375,0.9598322,0.0004468983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038014352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045258328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48042157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008031351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011792963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243187339","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4547","title":"Intelligent Governmentality","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Humanities; Political science; Normalization (sociology); Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.08876660572242885,"score_gpt":0.37786608833157453,"score_spread":0.2890994826091457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243187339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5346095,0.00011357506,0.00035447677,0.0051407497,0.000576801,0.00041881343,0.000032118667,0.00006485953,0.45868912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956067,0.00020668222,0.00030293156,0.0022021332,0.00035574788,0.0000072388016,0.0000018565089,0.0000066453445,0.0013100711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984345,0.00013564064,0.00024136677,0.00019037754,0.0006612207,0.00033688667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917233,0.0001148628,0.00009034309,0.0001899784,0.00010249975,0.00033000804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061526225,0.0000816869,0.00015851334,0.00004519828,0.00033708135,0.000046679765,0.0006044835,0.000082450686,0.00093929184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047688856,0.00008541255,0.000052525236,0.00034984274,0.0002111733,0.00035744114,0.00014288949,0.000112093,0.00019515093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043698942,0.0018250744,0.12405096,0.0007899939,0.00015663519,0.000102716775,0.14991274,0.00025996336,0.00035579258,0.41114652,0.27975294,0.031209672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018199731,0.000085046835,0.06808987,0.000042750875,0.00003879154,0.0000024145702,0.004358592,0.000011835431,0.00063027506,0.0006225762,0.92572916,0.00020666375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117334835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010818291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64597625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001922282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033272008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249062820","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4613","title":"Economic Incarceration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misdemeanor; Minor (academic); Sanctions; Population; Adjudication; Revenue; Business; Law; Political science; Finance; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.041893194412490085,"score_gpt":0.2691188120501002,"score_spread":0.2272256176376101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249062820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4396311,0.00027210056,0.0072067315,0.0003645359,0.0015448994,0.00043395456,0.0000957767,0.000048906368,0.550402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672574,0.000035699268,0.00040108443,0.0006190799,0.0011459477,0.000011598416,0.000009361006,0.000035933997,0.0010155484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981831,0.000009417506,0.0010142262,0.00040829633,0.000037013215,0.0003479854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988506,0.000089394714,0.00047817774,0.00037909107,0.000036565998,0.00016617899],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010296716,0.00013327858,0.00046240992,0.00034625095,0.00008734988,0.00012853039,0.0005009379,0.00012923001,0.0005852232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009614588,0.00020313828,0.00010500921,0.0001285485,0.00007298951,0.0005601424,0.00013037084,0.000099125486,0.0019625311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021134017,0.00014399985,0.1407064,0.0002655231,0.00015547573,0.0000076119723,0.0016286634,0.0021951857,0.00035117075,0.8373456,0.013509304,0.0034797152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003387513,0.00052911165,0.57416165,0.00019774341,0.00017219609,0.000018701287,0.0008750978,0.0045188484,0.009303185,0.09363646,0.3108919,0.0023075882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014558281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048421024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74370915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022279346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037613558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255957776","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4506","title":"Consultation During Rule-Making: A Case Study of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Obligation; Humanities; Refugee; Public administration; Cabinet (room); Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.10714368950179845,"score_gpt":0.4665029569270166,"score_spread":0.3593592674252182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255957776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99470747,0.000011578916,0.000085130974,0.00077263877,0.0006542498,0.0029116475,0.0000063725083,0.000025431309,0.0008254808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990351,0.0000014774097,0.00016694765,0.000054756565,0.00025522517,0.00017206886,7.5111416e-7,0.000015176155,0.00029846505],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809146,0.0006716667,0.0006065656,0.00020942918,0.00026229612,0.00015860936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797004,0.000449708,0.00076299434,0.0003150249,0.00044370495,0.000058551264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010530568,0.000097263066,0.00018524977,0.00013102412,0.0005677601,0.000022496995,0.00012344802,0.00014644755,0.000046608373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014016874,0.00007425565,0.000019227264,0.00030953318,0.000031618034,0.00045789647,0.00010632423,0.00046633076,0.000005786467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021234176,0.0008737592,0.31756857,0.013685485,0.00018953833,0.000068533474,0.285225,0.00051103975,0.3400063,0.00223821,0.00025319905,0.03725696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016271888,0.0002846244,0.93640447,0.0006454216,0.00024596904,0.000105911146,0.055688936,0.0006745679,0.0019234138,0.00008452,0.0021281645,0.00018679933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034589188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007083381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6188359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032521988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001368617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52288735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281617713","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7285","title":"The Legal Regulation of Sadomasochism and the So-Called “Rough Sex Defence”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Sadomasochism; Context (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Same sex; Narrative; Criminology; Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; Sociology; Gender studies; Human sexuality; History; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Art; Medicine; Literature","score_opus":0.034536178810233735,"score_gpt":0.3355211914703289,"score_spread":0.30098501266009514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281617713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7296079,0.0026550358,0.0015129931,0.048126295,0.001871248,0.0025593115,0.000035558995,0.00012330538,0.2135084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496514,0.00009243582,0.000105494764,0.00039648602,0.00017365348,0.00004868798,0.0000010953673,0.000006876218,0.00421015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863017,0.00030768794,0.00023668377,0.00013625478,0.0005362974,0.00015290597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986574,0.00083220284,0.00018216562,0.00015549826,0.00013728128,0.00003546069],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001104198,0.00006874775,0.00016004809,0.000040171057,0.0016736903,0.000108296634,0.00044437932,0.00002679785,0.00010532628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046113055,0.00004513348,0.00003926909,0.00034811912,0.00060222443,0.00017689954,0.00031439957,0.00010259193,0.0000021998292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020826815,0.0002491687,0.010054589,0.00015353638,0.00041904923,0.0000027574163,0.29217893,0.014567667,0.0007675182,0.62444246,0.03189213,0.023189524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040762657,0.0002712647,0.0730212,0.000048322778,0.0007516043,0.0000032213409,0.19694181,0.0033315578,0.00058809284,0.010413453,0.71003634,0.00051689066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013414287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032287714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6781442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027696828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000991561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281682254","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7284","title":"Practising an Anti-Colonial Citizenship Education Through a Blended Learning Course on Aboriginal Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Citizenship; Colonialism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.06902634390145324,"score_gpt":0.45732634177729153,"score_spread":0.3882999978758383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281682254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5066345,0.000037754333,0.00010946341,0.05366133,0.002817498,0.00065226364,0.00001832129,0.00013301717,0.4359359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900874,0.000010593887,0.0011625586,0.005397898,0.0009728788,0.000082061604,0.000026334,0.000021603497,0.0022386604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978398,0.0006182715,0.00027274285,0.00029377145,0.0006948917,0.00028050985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848795,0.00044980305,0.00034937513,0.00022993675,0.00035703043,0.0001259083],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010749398,0.00011305352,0.00015127337,0.00013397515,0.0016515381,0.0004148993,0.00050184573,0.000058530375,0.0015072317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007355677,0.00013756793,0.00003685818,0.0009085018,0.00012715721,0.001570843,0.00005916395,0.00070929906,0.000055260694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023336198,0.0011406037,0.0020067585,0.00004667329,0.00004321945,0.0000056187178,0.05139049,0.0028047306,0.0007087877,0.9194285,0.018859599,0.0033316326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030077528,0.00029050707,0.010373688,0.000038452312,0.0001886409,0.000005210029,0.029806064,0.00003259599,0.0003496103,0.002200992,0.95614535,0.00026813758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009675255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005639983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021697006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045700823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281718201","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7196","title":"L’accès à l’accompagnement et à la représentation par les personnes accidentées ou malades du travail : une analyse sous le prisme des coûts de la justice","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09344380584774481,"score_gpt":0.45641706058705894,"score_spread":0.36297325473931413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281718201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370521,0.004590649,0.0018423063,0.027468324,0.0011398969,0.0023552128,0.0003690769,0.000111058835,0.025071383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854783,0.0022162478,0.003972715,0.0019978448,0.0009804997,0.00064990367,0.00011490404,0.00010133224,0.004488292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.988897,0.006512055,0.00127794,0.00076424243,0.001305811,0.0012428964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911494,0.0062990044,0.0006602032,0.00058316457,0.00062354363,0.0006846322],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060284957,0.00041736444,0.0006627935,0.00058071216,0.0028513768,0.0001985879,0.0011249653,0.0003600594,0.002744091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022175738,0.00047108028,0.00020549755,0.001265947,0.0005522707,0.00075125915,0.0010022458,0.001707438,0.0001444047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056190575,0.0036596223,0.64160913,0.021493884,0.0005277247,0.0003052096,0.12288678,0.040313635,0.0012666873,0.008604759,0.082110584,0.07160292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019796707,0.00047650276,0.88351923,0.0005921248,0.0010304891,0.000040799856,0.0940819,0.0030621288,0.0001824479,0.0006317178,0.013971946,0.00043104714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027737506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023209543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24191009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055595604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002341248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281719511","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7283","title":"Access to Justice as a Social Determinant of Health: The Basis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Framing (construction); Political science; Realm; Health equity; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Health care; Geography","score_opus":0.18410616623551274,"score_gpt":0.5251866666900734,"score_spread":0.3410805004545607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281719511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73552907,0.00021151696,0.00042399656,0.22867759,0.0047783433,0.0040983926,0.000300568,0.0000893831,0.025891123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90435207,0.00004736409,0.000319179,0.08878838,0.00191953,0.0013035795,0.000020674168,0.000069667374,0.0031795532],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537945,0.0011994463,0.0012708496,0.0003849236,0.00078325695,0.0009820536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965683,0.001178444,0.0008893517,0.000584205,0.0004066878,0.0003729616],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029512856,0.00020701985,0.0005577428,0.0003662039,0.00256652,0.000048120884,0.0018468788,0.00011093567,0.001824226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010720222,0.00017625037,0.000099900215,0.0012625942,0.00007608864,0.00034491607,0.0016884442,0.0007091124,0.00013572625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005371987,0.0005088426,0.005008452,0.006248685,0.00007087959,0.0000033379833,0.09917671,0.00061219675,0.00024950216,0.005250827,0.84684277,0.035490613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083582674,0.00062069634,0.23295453,0.00032534046,0.0003629,0.000004722965,0.053558625,0.00016228565,0.00014250142,0.0003309781,0.7103129,0.0003886711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0142422225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037143705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22794609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004837444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030073002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281733716","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7280","title":"Sex Workers and the Best Interests of their Children: Issues Faced by Sex Workers Involved in Custody and Access Legal Proceedings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Child custody; Sex work; Best interests; Female sex; Stigma (botany); Judicial opinion; Family law; Same sex; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Family medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.0227481550487409,"score_gpt":0.31702754742897266,"score_spread":0.29427939238023176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281733716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98532677,0.0023098076,0.0000032343205,0.0031630734,0.00015146262,0.00086135016,0.000009972465,0.000033837976,0.008140471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686563,0.00040577658,0.00003987045,0.0002276504,0.00011190229,0.00005249895,0.0000038910507,0.000023841354,0.0022689393],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822575,0.00018971173,0.00039227286,0.00037816743,0.00046052624,0.00035356378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912024,0.00027521353,0.00023971926,0.00015688018,0.00008122207,0.00012672578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010161964,0.00020026609,0.00042215572,0.00020711328,0.00040971243,0.0003155594,0.001036289,0.00012059338,0.000094153205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018392227,0.0001535441,0.000050988037,0.0008088033,0.0007567081,0.00056073297,0.00077523,0.00042904133,0.0000016161365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088363973,0.00028374005,0.788709,0.00017591588,0.00026160112,0.0000057542165,0.19049463,0.00058340817,0.0002347566,0.0006689621,0.011758731,0.005939906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040106922,0.00041679945,0.10770871,0.0007869608,0.00054807786,0.000006315929,0.86104846,0.00042583287,0.0035547826,0.0008713723,0.019703923,0.00091810664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008944813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003167255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68100023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054000633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000929515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99765474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281789958","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7281","title":"Measuring Improvements in Access to Justice: Utilizing an A2J Measurement Framework for Comparative Justice Data Collection and Program Evaluation Across Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Data collection; Population; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Business; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.7083547047958997,"score_gpt":0.5923293814452161,"score_spread":0.1160253233506836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281789958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697227,0.00018682725,0.015643125,0.0018804931,0.002374136,0.008814185,0.000323147,0.000046862464,0.0010085258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98746103,0.0000080873115,0.009001949,0.0013255593,0.00018427514,0.0018835323,0.000058342284,0.000024587785,0.000052647527],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99134,0.000592485,0.0011271832,0.0011020049,0.00528155,0.00055680686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952344,0.00091082347,0.0005790622,0.0010534029,0.0019287637,0.00029359187],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138134,0.00026662985,0.00048061635,0.0003249883,0.0009582746,0.00092326,0.002449122,0.00006817414,0.000272549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003993181,0.0002651219,0.000034962788,0.0018363111,0.000043690736,0.0019803394,0.0017110957,0.00035719931,0.0000042232723],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004218328,0.0021479083,0.029305972,0.0015674069,0.0002997401,0.000008644243,0.025971455,0.40475407,0.0031726772,0.00075505505,0.028139902,0.49965882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003257799,0.0013822948,0.24151628,0.00034938837,0.0013029925,0.0000037872462,0.065260254,0.6657296,0.002257893,0.00093887537,0.01714057,0.00086029543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020795321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21246038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49879855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010462058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020239707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281885721","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7193","title":"Judicializing Foreign Affairs: The Canada-Saudi Arms Deal and the Implications of Transnational Tort Litigation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Multinational corporation; Political science; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Tort reform; Liability","score_opus":0.030402332600442263,"score_gpt":0.30286835348248914,"score_spread":0.27246602088204686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281885721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64971995,0.000120312674,0.0009048768,0.080731444,0.00045138627,0.0013840505,0.00025237704,0.000025794481,0.2664098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985223,0.0000029729777,0.00008519614,0.0006204553,0.00019539958,0.0000753819,0.000008750757,0.000005329938,0.00048421958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998872,0.00012525872,0.0002144919,0.00011066728,0.0005595377,0.000118064156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908596,0.00044295276,0.00013810201,0.000101840546,0.00019182627,0.00003933952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006047999,0.000052968117,0.00009592916,0.000042365376,0.00081552315,0.000045246754,0.0005110217,0.000017346572,0.00027631415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006138336,0.000037241458,0.000035974765,0.00011218314,0.0002700314,0.00013254712,0.000071580595,0.00009000204,3.5490118e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003435561,0.000012493722,0.00031865833,0.0000100045845,0.000019632458,2.2133487e-7,0.0040870556,0.00038877048,0.000027178765,0.9942661,0.0007389396,0.00009657654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014571202,0.000097144926,0.20671175,0.00004342374,0.00048058023,0.000005237677,0.01979638,0.00048044964,0.0006430539,0.66869384,0.101236574,0.00035445468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09375524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1883802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34880236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010469172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005926011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91227955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281896359","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7195","title":"As the Water Grinds the Stone: Comparison of Represented and Self-represented Appellant Populations in the Federal Court of Appeal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Population; Political science; Federal court; Psychology; Supreme court; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.0705370376734049,"score_gpt":0.3057938912696534,"score_spread":0.23525685359624848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281896359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97932875,0.0003755115,0.00008246328,0.003996011,0.000383145,0.0007892808,0.00010089809,0.000009906528,0.014934053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993241,0.000027606338,0.000020424619,0.00026142257,0.000116416384,0.00005247811,0.000013563255,0.00001578532,0.00016822598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982962,0.00012952703,0.0009525765,0.0002758237,0.00011823005,0.00022763078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986813,0.00018506437,0.00051647704,0.00053973205,0.000041271538,0.000036157227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012903219,0.000108729924,0.0004596969,0.00014749188,0.0002595256,0.00006984199,0.0008405846,0.00004727096,0.0001367012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007105598,0.000073543015,0.00008856866,0.0002271681,0.0001543926,0.000120714765,0.00043476536,0.00021558985,0.000015646974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002627289,0.00066277926,0.8657039,0.00021024373,0.0002276092,0.0000031820473,0.025910143,0.021278633,0.00014930508,0.080589116,0.004845563,0.000156834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025900619,0.0005745443,0.8881382,0.00008296986,0.00025016037,0.0000299536,0.02684959,0.027015012,0.0013166268,0.023679858,0.02883166,0.0006413872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009023249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004942122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05690926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043707936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022288192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282014895","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7198","title":"Getting to Proportionality: The Trouble with Sentencing for Possession of Child Pornography in Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Seriousness; Proportionality (law); Possession (linguistics); Harm; Punitive damages; Criminology; Psychology; Reasonable suspicion; Child pornography; Pornography; Political science; Legislation; Law; Social psychology; Computer science; The Internet","score_opus":0.040986544675246636,"score_gpt":0.32815430170845156,"score_spread":0.2871677570332049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282014895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99189776,0.000022467637,0.0014075759,0.0024653773,0.00012988455,0.0006496433,0.00000824649,0.000011486961,0.0034075393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981147,0.0000020048706,0.00074407744,0.00061032764,0.0000800659,0.00014082728,0.0000041312105,0.000008429743,0.00029542294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987013,0.0000798669,0.00028905756,0.00020441874,0.00051410985,0.0002112575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922603,0.00015417454,0.00018822456,0.00016952935,0.00019951859,0.00006252361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086438423,0.000076537515,0.00017629423,0.00027306523,0.00060843263,0.000047713245,0.0004052405,0.000021216272,0.00016270009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001377792,0.000060830196,0.00008452655,0.0010468392,0.00005842508,0.0001801314,0.00014032441,0.00016124411,7.1844636e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032959778,0.0016292447,0.4542155,0.00075109344,0.00038729853,0.000022872384,0.3635393,0.12802207,0.002509191,0.0077948216,0.0026210495,0.035211563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057068083,0.00052999996,0.116307884,0.0002801098,0.0011391334,0.000004423503,0.8616429,0.00023715623,0.0006382324,0.00014627716,0.018192764,0.00031042728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2558669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46812275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4981036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034920228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74908835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284878679","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7391","title":"Incomplete Justice: The Costs of Partial Indemnity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Mistake; Misconduct; Economic Justice; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07634989612343603,"score_gpt":0.3785023178552912,"score_spread":0.3021524217318552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284878679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79787433,0.00013365375,0.0010553667,0.014314854,0.0008410733,0.0015213261,0.00026357523,0.000080942205,0.18391487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980212,0.00001057968,0.00015606234,0.00083298254,0.00033849437,0.00009418311,0.0000033227423,0.000010072346,0.0005330915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844503,0.00022940955,0.00028843392,0.00018106023,0.00061778806,0.00023827548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884534,0.00037469174,0.00020853737,0.0003306433,0.00013566056,0.0001051063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008958972,0.00007926386,0.00015730063,0.00005990331,0.00091709784,0.000057685087,0.0012357028,0.00003505587,0.0007260346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029526144,0.00006949581,0.00006308939,0.0005671831,0.00024289956,0.00016430348,0.000672335,0.0002283028,0.00002522317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030467927,0.0007301963,0.008199314,0.00028379963,0.00012272224,0.0000064396195,0.03379812,0.010654864,0.0036025012,0.90226984,0.029849954,0.010177587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062273396,0.00018516326,0.04089287,0.00004096014,0.0007753532,0.0000016212852,0.021373393,0.0007086543,0.0014746941,0.0019720034,0.93156815,0.00038439984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004251359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040428425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9017182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009849423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027414458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7949569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284885721","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7390","title":"The Consequences of Unfreedom: Learning from Story Amidst a Global Climate Crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Narrative; Indigenous; Political science; Climate change; Democracy; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Politics; Ecology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03556608946062637,"score_gpt":0.3318075510633373,"score_spread":0.2962414616027109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284885721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8460635,0.00085525267,0.000025032956,0.0060600946,0.00066011125,0.0003846249,0.00025998626,0.000060076254,0.14563133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983668,0.0001647841,0.000113813076,0.00050140236,0.00020085314,0.00002361637,0.000003701161,0.000008590237,0.0006164961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982287,0.00047353157,0.00022623353,0.00018710163,0.00058424857,0.00030013605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895495,0.00050861144,0.00021386812,0.00019174493,0.000030438403,0.00010041144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007727074,0.00009046631,0.00016770606,0.00003117291,0.0011540481,0.0000618094,0.0008803405,0.00003828508,0.0005945433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024808422,0.00008171087,0.00006930152,0.00026399118,0.00065946113,0.00016756938,0.00045906662,0.00019232514,0.000029226123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012150101,0.000562801,0.17342477,0.00025681447,0.00043516708,0.000044692923,0.05818862,0.0193878,0.00968089,0.6834518,0.042276,0.011075667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008737772,0.0005403177,0.09112716,0.000086736836,0.0006103028,0.0000022908691,0.13154474,0.00006201659,0.0021986323,0.0054828203,0.7668287,0.0006425149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019796008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014188025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7245527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019789473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015690952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98673123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284887130","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7388","title":"Mapping Racial Geographies of Violence on the Colonial Landscape","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Materiality (auditing); Colonialism; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Vulnerability (computing); Criminology; Environmental justice; Race (biology); Inequality; Geography; Gender studies; Ethnology; Political science; Ecology; Aesthetics; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.026231122946789705,"score_gpt":0.31476815121689994,"score_spread":0.28853702827011024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284887130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93361145,0.00012819869,0.00001092884,0.0012352435,0.00089449016,0.0005850886,0.000025406986,0.000021358703,0.06348781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977172,0.0005555299,0.000055548655,0.00027871292,0.0005783089,0.000016774286,0.0000029710768,0.000008702324,0.00078627444],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845153,0.00028618018,0.00024531703,0.00016805489,0.0005646955,0.00028423185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990012,0.00038556434,0.0001999823,0.00019677091,0.00014351611,0.00007298145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010320235,0.00007890278,0.00015316256,0.00021881984,0.0033523224,0.000037181548,0.00075728184,0.00004436913,0.0006446792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037103146,0.00006121338,0.00005738233,0.0007029791,0.00021675423,0.00011072795,0.000017698094,0.00016976387,0.0000140704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026799983,0.00040634876,0.007121068,0.0001998403,0.000047192374,0.0000035139449,0.79301935,0.0005017716,0.000063219304,0.19516394,0.0022107628,0.0009949722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044816328,0.00051533105,0.06558365,0.0002595782,0.00012444654,0.0000013756033,0.068684675,0.00003435377,0.0007506055,0.0027679089,0.860449,0.00038087458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023281112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039571565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8582383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047765687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021033008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284889561","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7389","title":"Integrating Social Work Within Legal Clinics: An Inter-Professional Perspective to Address Social-Legal Needs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Social work; Public relations; Legal profession; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08879246285694156,"score_gpt":0.45659572673884535,"score_spread":0.36780326388190376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284889561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48915052,0.000027664162,0.00063873065,0.18159673,0.008058678,0.0014108303,0.00014363116,0.0002363988,0.31873682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764437,6.051493e-7,0.0013969716,0.008082029,0.0023299512,0.0001779171,0.00001805376,0.000034454002,0.011516313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683195,0.0008309531,0.00058609725,0.00038813075,0.0009523771,0.00041048805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977465,0.0004777495,0.00044548724,0.00020192903,0.0009045153,0.00022379693],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021079395,0.00018385451,0.00028826162,0.00048390444,0.0030334345,0.00073763006,0.0012198089,0.0001244996,0.0028082118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023875493,0.00020416024,0.00010463407,0.0030737305,0.00020479482,0.002068175,0.0005205687,0.0012193802,0.00006558031],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044187607,0.0004929985,0.0010379418,0.000020461708,0.000052759973,0.000005073862,0.39118218,0.00017691501,0.00014537554,0.5629338,0.04084388,0.0026667155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031094765,0.00017011154,0.0060309796,0.000037897476,0.00012572894,0.0000013368672,0.6114184,0.000030793795,0.00004536578,0.0008652301,0.3806029,0.00036028065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005573244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011966886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5620686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005601877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00222295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284892928","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7392","title":"“A So-Called Tenants’ Union”: Defining the Organizational Power of Tenants within and outside the Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renting; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Law; Bargaining power; Labour law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.025729808930672383,"score_gpt":0.30689567893397945,"score_spread":0.28116587000330706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284892928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89197993,0.0005789609,0.0001265892,0.040699385,0.0011810187,0.000824281,0.00008997599,0.000043967193,0.06447588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996984,0.00002254529,0.00011812688,0.0016754661,0.00009151547,0.000014086369,7.83076e-7,0.000009129988,0.0010843165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982669,0.0002422986,0.00024235013,0.00018601607,0.00083340134,0.00022905148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989131,0.0004296436,0.00027286782,0.00016937222,0.00014529937,0.000069686954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014959335,0.00008012252,0.00014512884,0.000026579575,0.0014487831,0.000116158655,0.00095431705,0.000034660086,0.00034826875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065701955,0.00004784924,0.000034204342,0.00068730855,0.0006883577,0.00021271614,0.00043870846,0.00014953477,0.0000055185565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007274668,0.00011471434,0.04961234,0.000030337167,0.000054744523,0.0000043694045,0.15118656,0.0014665313,0.0003509187,0.78883994,0.0074058212,0.000860986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012912344,0.00035019542,0.5002871,0.00015226111,0.000378295,0.000008122896,0.32274765,0.00036408674,0.00089728815,0.014866263,0.15792407,0.0007334351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011999288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044405856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7739737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041584382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036874306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316881650","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7781","title":"The Influence of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence in the First Decade Since its Ratification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Ratification; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Treaty; Political science; Law; Convention; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Medicine; Psychiatry; Politics","score_opus":0.054730168962198074,"score_gpt":0.3368384121706654,"score_spread":0.28210824320846734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316881650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9261108,0.0000112927055,0.0000027197354,0.035580814,0.0000906866,0.00068519876,0.00003732575,0.000004271677,0.037476882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837804,0.0000046778073,0.0000023978196,0.0008230058,0.00002182521,0.00008312919,7.9918306e-7,0.0000037481645,0.000682372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829084,0.0004887194,0.00021734898,0.0001323118,0.0007107475,0.00016002773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981058,0.0012161995,0.00018711848,0.0003372575,0.00011795212,0.000035645582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013371641,0.00006785484,0.00008725769,0.00005058047,0.0011550324,0.00007262166,0.0012570352,0.000025045978,0.000053914446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006962391,0.000033225424,0.00003817658,0.00049458916,0.0005800561,0.0001644717,0.000055514043,0.00015738924,0.000003831036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069232956,0.00008229437,0.002024062,0.000040592666,0.000008324444,2.53298e-7,0.07118747,0.0033332217,0.000045364777,0.9225142,0.0005948568,0.000100156205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043366262,0.00041907313,0.6928766,0.00046659092,0.00017605994,7.423398e-7,0.18665314,0.00020349628,0.0031956965,0.006572668,0.108692996,0.00030926717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35684982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9159415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011629516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026578872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93998003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317038158","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7779","title":"The Triumph of the “Therapeutic” in Quebec Courts: Mental Health, Behavioural Reform and the Decline of Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Public Health and Social Inequalities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Mental health; Economic Justice; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05808643350993687,"score_gpt":0.38053195781569554,"score_spread":0.3224455243057587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317038158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86151433,0.0014092136,0.0000039829647,0.12622198,0.0007270544,0.0012259681,0.00010345266,0.000011384929,0.008782649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956708,0.00014013023,0.000011956645,0.0025005208,0.00008876682,0.000046818892,0.0000018893194,0.0000061703267,0.0015329545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974223,0.00093491556,0.00054838817,0.00011486576,0.0006794976,0.00030006358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986605,0.00055559276,0.0003881511,0.0002102217,0.00010070697,0.00008482261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037989027,0.00007784302,0.00026030833,0.000055082288,0.0011306237,0.000049350398,0.00088177464,0.00004294018,0.000054734035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019792799,0.000042588817,0.000067473455,0.00035391617,0.0008022495,0.00016923083,0.00032664445,0.00021249925,2.9428725e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013612175,0.0003477638,0.010320374,0.00023213851,0.000072905634,0.0000010347296,0.36331823,0.000033006338,0.0000380761,0.6084003,0.0047274777,0.011147458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062046335,0.00049195514,0.16482577,0.00018521654,0.00020740747,0.0000024283427,0.43861043,0.00016452899,0.0003510569,0.023458114,0.3650494,0.0004490645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55355394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25834054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5849422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002913298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008821065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8695958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317038159","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7780","title":"People With Disabilities Need Lawyers Too! A Ready-To-Use Plan for Law Schools to Educate Law Students to Effectively Serve the Legal Needs of Clients With Disabilities as Well as Clients Without Disabilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Legal education; Inclusion (mineral); Curriculum; Diversity (politics); Law; Legal profession; Action plan; Legal research; Plan (archaeology); Education Act; Political science; Special education; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.05319086489561085,"score_gpt":0.3855859909408429,"score_spread":0.332395126045232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317038159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410007,0.0000049087307,0.000052905096,0.017664734,0.00070190924,0.004795851,0.00035574337,0.00006998832,0.035353266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754262,0.0000012510096,0.00057915936,0.0069264104,0.00023408385,0.0021653248,0.000034462315,0.00006477761,0.014568331],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959314,0.0005749887,0.00065428205,0.0005617859,0.001591261,0.0006863132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939898,0.0035922574,0.0003111898,0.00077425817,0.00085228815,0.00048020916],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001509913,0.00036177653,0.0005535954,0.0002667961,0.0013802918,0.0010383558,0.0016594032,0.00007455402,0.0004679855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004388434,0.00028689156,0.00010122322,0.0018526876,0.0006379142,0.002053998,0.00056038256,0.00044255346,0.00013341843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006452978,0.0017709237,0.2712394,0.00043577957,0.00026597755,6.4784854e-7,0.42406398,0.0036330028,0.00011387437,0.28191873,0.010019881,0.00008483324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000969264,0.00249068,0.02708364,0.0001888832,0.00038110718,0.000003435387,0.79080623,0.00000305022,0.00045475108,0.00059904496,0.17647073,0.0005492022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121021785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031363685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36674225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004902953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009325202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317038211","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7778","title":"Students in Name Only: Improving the Working Conditions of Articled Students Via the Application of the BC Employment Standards Act","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Thompson Rivers University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Overtime; Statutory law; Status quo; Political science; Principal (computer security); Power (physics); Narrative; Rhetorical question; Public administration; Law; Labour economics; Sociology; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.02337011433174587,"score_gpt":0.36788481007450485,"score_spread":0.344514695742759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317038211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960998,0.000041329327,0.00016296262,0.0012753551,0.00020683907,0.0011215728,0.000059135775,0.00000871396,0.0010242414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914014,0.000008761803,0.000014728195,0.00045892684,0.000051197043,0.00012094897,0.0000014920626,0.000009283286,0.00019448913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974253,0.00031806048,0.00035393305,0.00015534634,0.0015490878,0.0001982477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988969,0.000222655,0.00032348762,0.00037477456,0.00014555224,0.000036619538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017071812,0.000077455974,0.00014301903,0.000058350535,0.0006136941,0.00007492597,0.0018090785,0.00002377512,0.00015079534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015350693,0.000047975504,0.000058311805,0.0006622557,0.00018110273,0.00011977553,0.0008263155,0.0001682789,5.5998925e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013619887,0.0012549659,0.90063816,0.000044133896,0.00018079429,0.0000010733565,0.043346312,0.0043133,0.007184301,0.028504228,0.0004188271,0.013977683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044351182,0.000054826814,0.98108983,0.000045694494,0.00014787966,1.05989535e-7,0.010384782,0.00007140903,0.0008157968,0.00034082236,0.006530244,0.0000750819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065711946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003680218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08045167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020030317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002452551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914506","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8297","title":"Bargaining Sectoral Standards: Towards Canadian Fair Pay Agreement Legislation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Collective bargaining; Business; Agreement; Economics; Law and economics; Labour economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05271552033813775,"score_gpt":0.36072227387864436,"score_spread":0.3080067535405066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32310605,0.00006461964,0.00053302187,0.015235731,0.002212066,0.0012360832,0.0006730062,0.00027029993,0.65666914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941676,0.0000318966,0.00016481712,0.0010918224,0.0005105506,0.000019170117,0.000020175461,0.00001652051,0.0039774226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818516,0.00008427114,0.00023286731,0.00023222806,0.00078518054,0.00048029044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989959,0.000056622102,0.000082242725,0.00020455952,0.0003163452,0.0003443429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001024275,0.00010687143,0.0001549458,0.00030549956,0.00043392275,0.0001909698,0.00046387513,0.000076739954,0.0013791743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004275133,0.00009374382,0.000046460034,0.00087267306,0.00007151846,0.00043553952,0.00010396074,0.00010823084,0.000052001724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015543569,0.00020283413,0.06891431,0.00016370455,0.00039526174,0.00012586999,0.11222362,0.006124423,0.0015545685,0.3988026,0.29292488,0.11841246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034668128,0.00007767043,0.29825264,0.00009046383,0.00009035876,8.9214346e-8,0.005448479,0.00013828004,0.00028598204,0.00082154135,0.69418067,0.0002671713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3530986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46594667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6710616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003573728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001418009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914512","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8299","title":"Bound by Blame: Sentencing, Colonialism, and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder; Criminology; Colonialism; Fetal alcohol; Psychology; Political science; Alcohol; Psychiatry; Pregnancy; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.020745536510607312,"score_gpt":0.3077435718410821,"score_spread":0.2869980353304748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930006,0.00055595214,0.00012443434,0.002822486,0.00039416787,0.00081037986,0.0000485838,0.0001735303,0.0020698642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657476,0.00008595913,0.00015928574,0.00070883177,0.00028971798,0.00003917303,0.000037612157,0.000053192074,0.002051467],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833965,0.000043725217,0.00029761766,0.00041611344,0.00046302835,0.00043984244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900573,0.00018839241,0.00011074485,0.0003604194,0.00006991712,0.00026481273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002738488,0.00021575656,0.0004069033,0.00020232763,0.000085004685,0.000075461794,0.00025530058,0.00011629286,0.00011652183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037516834,0.00020582246,0.00006476635,0.00059712643,0.00014231045,0.0002688357,0.00027480684,0.00021250368,0.00016383713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028376393,0.0007506517,0.19558918,0.004518356,0.0008057397,0.0010139886,0.005124724,0.00020312908,0.47385287,0.000596902,0.30181497,0.012891833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009939159,0.0022202316,0.78250307,0.0014352627,0.0020306045,0.00018051855,0.001632356,0.0022365148,0.14268064,0.00040625728,0.053364526,0.0013708263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035832947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014419813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5869139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006727424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086484055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83931965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914589","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8579","title":"Swimming Up Niagara Falls! The Battle to Get Disability Rights Added to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Battle; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03491845498282878,"score_gpt":0.3268648556685373,"score_spread":0.29194640068570854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95114416,0.00035994727,0.00003047063,0.03179729,0.001720888,0.0014295308,0.00011473804,0.00005043689,0.01335252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739236,0.0000058599185,0.00013321827,0.0004886368,0.00065080315,0.00006093929,0.0000014474623,0.00001049756,0.001256254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824697,0.00015944181,0.00028685998,0.00035121926,0.00052807434,0.0004274596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983467,0.00077849795,0.00005460261,0.0003039311,0.00017905775,0.00033724384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070432725,0.00016843622,0.00025348793,0.000058092148,0.0010312299,0.00031308507,0.000736829,0.00008732592,0.00020778533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005586268,0.00009155032,0.00007520476,0.00046058567,0.0005713673,0.00028224086,0.00024880917,0.00018288824,0.000114611874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017288691,0.00016815617,0.006782003,0.0005899532,0.0005764922,0.000027546428,0.81263554,0.0004296282,0.00076269713,0.031658113,0.13836077,0.007836205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029391004,0.00015106516,0.14399996,0.00039446552,0.0005012466,0.0000016001761,0.012516418,0.000112424525,0.0012444583,0.0012734695,0.8389074,0.00060359266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51845545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8104465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8001191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022608854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010601151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7931491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914607","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8298","title":"Planning Law and Accessibility: Third Party Permit Appeals by Persons with Disabilities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10866387942701011,"score_gpt":0.3989521232790768,"score_spread":0.2902882438520667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6613831,0.00003782869,0.000048171674,0.0037930738,0.000106621184,0.00034281626,0.000060661696,0.0001637066,0.334064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932415,0.000013238285,0.00008461694,0.001071862,0.000113837144,0.000033497377,0.000010097069,0.000015423084,0.005415913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841756,0.00015312858,0.00022639864,0.0003291949,0.00051316357,0.00036054954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893963,0.00045039563,0.0000864184,0.00021614967,0.00009372697,0.00021367129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079333904,0.00012837515,0.00023384238,0.00007538045,0.0004497902,0.00033704322,0.00042388996,0.00007899279,0.00015269278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040972038,0.00011201943,0.00003715556,0.00039715742,0.00067696895,0.00079739426,0.00016530383,0.00010736869,0.00003962416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046918428,0.00032754717,0.106605545,0.0016872822,0.00014702819,0.000015591777,0.37101337,0.00022286734,0.00050138775,0.44833884,0.06792102,0.0027503462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020686986,0.0006914225,0.15947196,0.0011009389,0.00088075123,0.0000025226952,0.52454406,0.00028399396,0.0017934941,0.01343419,0.29390103,0.0018269069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019913672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011711445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43490463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003678195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007988443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45680195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914617","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.8294","title":"Safety in Numbers or Lost in the Crowd? Litigation of Mass Claims and Access to Justice in Ontario","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.11137195080881866,"score_gpt":0.3938040363502775,"score_spread":0.2824320855414588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705441,0.000019423915,0.00003845042,0.006577346,0.00022574684,0.00070607313,0.00000968258,0.000013499172,0.021865705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795246,0.00006164043,0.00017720634,0.0006847648,0.000090440604,0.00002881579,0.000002869706,0.000010249714,0.0009915291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981379,0.00020565279,0.0004698047,0.00030261083,0.0005136647,0.00037038486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853325,0.00093536545,0.00011487311,0.00021737261,0.00009287689,0.00010628759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016792517,0.00012353189,0.00026595508,0.00030513757,0.00009808041,0.00016533319,0.00091737724,0.00010624585,0.00019456362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008933777,0.00010545676,0.000029046569,0.0015342537,0.00015553563,0.0008464045,0.00021534186,0.00024168225,0.00003584549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030364105,0.00038522884,0.62295353,0.0021732955,0.000030720785,0.00025998463,0.32806608,0.010701856,0.0013475145,0.015661988,0.008354316,0.0070290538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046395225,0.00009215995,0.9641362,0.0006688588,0.00009955357,9.073172e-7,0.025982862,0.000074792064,0.0003037551,0.0008465628,0.0071162754,0.00021412202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23010257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79643005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5663275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021547024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038786352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77502424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914678","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8301","title":"The Nightingale Court Experiment: Lessons for Access to Justice in a Post-Pandemic World","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Pandemic; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.20728882075952218,"score_gpt":0.526498179586799,"score_spread":0.31920935882727686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7390581,0.00032381978,0.00059091183,0.22454065,0.004108418,0.0073061013,0.000164589,0.00039604458,0.023511376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96101433,0.00013531731,0.000829288,0.0191715,0.002006616,0.002734176,0.00003077412,0.00010924667,0.013968722],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961804,0.00047756155,0.0010300083,0.0005849012,0.0006359673,0.001091151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98760056,0.010338154,0.0003490663,0.000757909,0.00050991867,0.00044437454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003135563,0.0002656491,0.00051811535,0.00046501722,0.000826829,0.00013258078,0.0016825922,0.00020121211,0.00053857546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012261248,0.0002065881,0.000097693744,0.0014698175,0.0001041743,0.0005923184,0.0009825502,0.00076884474,0.00068867585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004869282,0.00080151414,0.041133773,0.008260348,0.00021863182,0.000048906975,0.048849363,0.0011850307,0.007874413,0.014571124,0.859631,0.012556629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021341427,0.00034435518,0.11874303,0.001662644,0.0006462523,0.000001131013,0.035156827,0.0008742822,0.0011265681,0.00069925917,0.8379918,0.00061971514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008063733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00273289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22195627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017459452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060153776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914770","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8300","title":"Tracing Colonial Entrenchments in the Development of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Colonialism; Tracing; Geography; Political science; Business; History; Ancient history; Computer science; South asia; Archaeology; Operating system","score_opus":0.055417992306794575,"score_gpt":0.35121506955608783,"score_spread":0.29579707724929327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898337,0.000021174434,0.0000046890414,0.0015436587,0.0004556197,0.0004335559,0.000013237869,0.000012975368,0.0076813893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952775,0.000010148927,0.000089243826,0.00010325088,0.00013245546,0.000014727354,0.0000017662928,0.0000046757987,0.00011597558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839956,0.0001701238,0.0003624651,0.00014330697,0.00060944876,0.00031512315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992582,0.00029605103,0.00016574886,0.00017713342,0.000054306256,0.000048513215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007337263,0.00008424369,0.00017978704,0.00010372697,0.00015998034,0.000033128814,0.0008735532,0.00006293053,0.00006774851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002359246,0.000060528757,0.00006223086,0.0007840648,0.0001466627,0.00011733961,0.00013036482,0.000102427075,0.000008574338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010902492,0.0002525856,0.07605545,0.00022562433,0.00005465655,0.0000066105663,0.91574436,0.0004907226,0.0011072907,0.0012549069,0.0008287797,0.0038699582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005319622,0.000040176685,0.9621682,0.0001862509,0.00010684252,2.781717e-7,0.018442966,0.000024204423,0.007885929,0.00015149434,0.010330746,0.0001309057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019875139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007180515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89730144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060901464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004028813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4006896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406310846","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9063","title":"Vers un tournant participatif dans les recherches sur l’accès à la justice","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.49182711948429964,"score_gpt":0.5061050605662976,"score_spread":0.014277941081997925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406310846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57225245,0.014995079,0.0036143416,0.100280754,0.019224534,0.0008751609,0.00014768407,0.00028110508,0.2883289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96507734,0.002791313,0.0048359893,0.00060281396,0.005531209,0.00007109041,0.0000136933595,0.00006014022,0.021016406],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646246,0.0013624346,0.00056683674,0.0005095131,0.0004910894,0.00060764205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99132794,0.0075780596,0.00017908671,0.00027692827,0.00033386718,0.00030409533],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043194527,0.00026494593,0.00033945614,0.00016803785,0.00045916357,0.00030877764,0.0008375961,0.00041426226,0.0006174889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004496085,0.00027994122,0.00015656756,0.0009317964,0.0012737134,0.0008186874,0.00013028049,0.0005644285,0.00020718006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065323635,0.0007082128,0.007611219,0.003828221,0.00064349483,0.000048134683,0.46491176,0.0017020492,0.0014095731,0.3786052,0.034170937,0.1062959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049626094,0.000257158,0.05616961,0.0024703266,0.004771758,0.000014268639,0.2600384,0.0015312124,0.001402005,0.0058184504,0.6660389,0.000991689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037169317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003855781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63186795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003378782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014082295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406310853","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9185","title":"No-Fault, Motor Vehicle Accidents, and The Civil Resolution Tribunal: Effective Justice or False Prophet?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Fault (geology); Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Humanities; Criminology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Seismology; Geology","score_opus":0.03893748772347299,"score_gpt":0.3611627251944742,"score_spread":0.3222252374710012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406310853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8260526,0.012453824,0.0023721936,0.032911964,0.006998969,0.009798888,0.00014300125,0.00078705174,0.108481534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904365,0.00046329407,0.00017777979,0.000559279,0.0011651688,0.00014869738,0.0000015497793,0.000025542191,0.007022217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978349,0.00037847165,0.00031734022,0.00042062195,0.0006478934,0.00040072456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972419,0.0019191626,0.00010003109,0.000266294,0.00028370586,0.00018889162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016805963,0.00017546322,0.00028340524,0.000112044116,0.0005235781,0.00056035566,0.0006699646,0.00011847257,0.00019570978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034294054,0.00011837103,0.000089599336,0.0005547891,0.000507737,0.0009078716,0.00028506163,0.00026202083,0.00020875123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048860613,0.0012601468,0.0032730808,0.02300848,0.0013419414,0.0008423505,0.1560443,0.0017821143,0.020268116,0.30636874,0.2784119,0.15853822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044011683,0.0015325584,0.04520249,0.004500828,0.007823634,0.000034010067,0.015726047,0.008640616,0.0021907007,0.004623455,0.90375584,0.0015686374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038977456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018606664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.625344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011978262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002365489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5892252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406323765","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9017","title":"Introduction: Harnessing the Untapped Potential of the Canadian Charter/Réaliser le potentiel inexploité de la Charte canadienne","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Humanities; Art; Law","score_opus":0.026606116428856158,"score_gpt":0.2964037499439292,"score_spread":0.269797633515073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406323765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51956373,0.0045332117,0.0002394638,0.44755197,0.010228278,0.0006363053,0.00010889279,0.000039317583,0.017098837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814665,0.0001432798,0.00005102639,0.0008578238,0.0036777777,0.000016825552,0.000002324271,0.00002892513,0.013755528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771947,0.0004314367,0.00037951497,0.00036583305,0.00043086708,0.00067291094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986866,0.00018781977,0.00013925046,0.00042611416,0.00021197424,0.0003482048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012516074,0.00019588532,0.00024682592,0.00014266181,0.0008823097,0.00053118466,0.0011752214,0.00018775872,0.0006497104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028968824,0.00015148608,0.00016716786,0.000949016,0.0011478629,0.00074829755,0.00018450517,0.00042889305,0.00005392377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023153213,0.00031141678,0.0014989336,0.0042527877,0.000625879,0.00028758094,0.1141332,0.0065438338,0.017309625,0.43278268,0.34972063,0.072301924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001775199,0.00006120364,0.021197308,0.0010953958,0.0011992133,0.00005885619,0.010730578,0.0010147117,0.0020801965,0.0018448698,0.96018934,0.0003508037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8175602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69608426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61046875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037663506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025466022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71138734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406324835","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9024","title":"Le droit constitutionnel aux communications et aux services publics fédéraux dans la langue officielle de son choix","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Politics and Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.04921862131085069,"score_gpt":0.3004025861817147,"score_spread":0.25118396487086403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406324835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07225292,0.01827223,0.009858869,0.04248968,0.0020757683,0.00055619417,0.0029213885,0.00013295755,0.85144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98231745,0.0015868286,0.0021071893,0.0025861457,0.00036033432,0.000046689012,0.00012422058,0.000059816386,0.010811337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792504,0.00006335932,0.00081790594,0.0005097324,0.00007660224,0.0006073707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980365,0.00031057562,0.00025842467,0.0009775728,0.0001442172,0.00027270487],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081389915,0.00026386915,0.0004912618,0.00037519904,0.00026500912,0.000942496,0.0015896643,0.00029931118,0.00041557578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016531696,0.0003813072,0.00019366635,0.000509673,0.00046257806,0.0010945961,0.0007738591,0.00043615457,0.0008502155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007942295,0.00026682677,0.0024885696,0.0010677445,0.000158158,0.00001217211,0.0018486929,0.0034864624,0.00001535382,0.98197013,0.008152476,0.0005254619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041333152,0.000061688384,0.010406883,0.000586982,0.00021187503,0.000028974666,0.0024622846,0.045185093,0.00007943181,0.020804577,0.9192593,0.0004995669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029235123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044384566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96116555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024739164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010450511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406324977","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9068","title":"Les modes de prévention et de règlement des différends [PRD] : une forme de participation citoyenne?","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.09692328417834967,"score_gpt":0.43294739397971066,"score_spread":0.336024109801361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406324977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91857916,0.003439548,0.025984347,0.013386381,0.0008442697,0.00033572793,0.0000518779,0.000082696664,0.03729601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872191,0.0010053815,0.002748412,0.00039266914,0.00080323993,0.000070183676,0.0000030068775,0.000022757768,0.0077352407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767447,0.00026074433,0.00035666814,0.000344999,0.0005717081,0.00079143705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897945,0.00030739972,0.00016477244,0.00014383683,0.0001123186,0.0002922292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015035076,0.00018004166,0.00021074263,0.000088598674,0.00037787415,0.00042685424,0.0005546974,0.00017426792,0.00045174794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040339143,0.00018860155,0.0001414652,0.0010292496,0.00044738804,0.001120756,0.00013330078,0.00019216229,0.000035029767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001486605,0.0006862402,0.0744507,0.0026792216,0.00019554849,0.000041839634,0.17813016,0.013401105,0.004691761,0.40463784,0.018185133,0.30275178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005016245,0.0004716922,0.7768947,0.002686699,0.0012194646,0.000004660716,0.018548977,0.025773043,0.0042615514,0.06626969,0.10257892,0.0007890088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08238854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039235953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70244396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007510031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325001","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9191","title":"Generative AI and Access to Justice in Canada: The Case of Self-Represented Litigants [SRLs]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07434151383586246,"score_gpt":0.40514238023896026,"score_spread":0.3308008664030978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704636,0.0003973478,0.00065205176,0.012795869,0.0012730823,0.0011253814,0.00008107099,0.000052158495,0.013159468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972042,0.00006318732,0.0002513202,0.0016892254,0.00041394238,0.000043247208,9.59567e-7,0.000021854394,0.00031208253],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978703,0.00026496436,0.00051068247,0.00043148582,0.00048627765,0.00043626173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979142,0.0010691216,0.00010424894,0.00032658447,0.0003341285,0.000251739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077230437,0.00017192076,0.00029196145,0.00020680466,0.00026613672,0.000349314,0.0009650453,0.00008546267,0.00019950022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012881999,0.0001456793,0.000039263196,0.0012824883,0.00026215907,0.0007565437,0.00046618504,0.0002593986,0.000018216046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009121754,0.000877449,0.039781664,0.0052622035,0.0010178958,0.009062025,0.42348465,0.043621816,0.006724497,0.21860933,0.15952387,0.0911224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014721954,0.0010409233,0.080566384,0.005755444,0.0071790023,0.00033761017,0.3938609,0.08425021,0.22184946,0.012638115,0.18562847,0.005421274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8771146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94799656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21512496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003119479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018521094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5940629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325005","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9183","title":"Probing The Data: Perspectives on Race Visibility in Canadian Sentencing Proceedings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Race (biology); Political science; Computer science; Geography; Sociology; Meteorology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06164440170896106,"score_gpt":0.3751106841611557,"score_spread":0.31346628245219466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643777,0.00037604716,0.00007256431,0.004866651,0.0003582907,0.00045555455,0.000017115091,0.00005122453,0.02942483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988137,0.000083402345,0.00006758717,0.00021009096,0.00039386313,0.000017605571,0.0000016966329,0.000010810995,0.00040128067],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986231,0.000052661147,0.00020070602,0.00043645926,0.0003384613,0.00034861863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999107,0.00025006765,0.000042218486,0.00028074608,0.00016725446,0.00015268069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014002115,0.00009786978,0.00014327104,0.00036956772,0.00034793248,0.0004572851,0.00086447474,0.000053381747,0.000102815604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010773899,0.00007887624,0.00004625808,0.0013326961,0.000118791766,0.0007194859,0.00014242096,0.00024745986,0.0000399559],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013175036,0.00024194355,0.012790042,0.00091434125,0.00016958936,0.00006051296,0.89976823,0.0017807547,0.0006127161,0.030421926,0.0074397647,0.04566841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046744997,0.000034802255,0.004163578,0.00034325995,0.0003910153,0.0000011652675,0.9767981,0.0033235382,0.00006310499,0.000053510877,0.014631136,0.00015002592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6997206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8091363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10941567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047346548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069517887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44096106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325006","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9262","title":"The Charter of Whites: Systemic Racism and Critical Race Equality in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Charter; Race (biology); Anti-racism; Critical race theory; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.035756434376737485,"score_gpt":0.401090279898057,"score_spread":0.36533384552131953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728044,0.0012655378,0.00015770028,0.016112937,0.00103588,0.0003266579,0.00002004952,0.000017177585,0.008259618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918133,0.00005943017,0.00004015876,0.00018312265,0.00016342412,0.000018545683,3.988012e-7,0.000008121293,0.0003454458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859375,0.00027569183,0.0003175416,0.00017928924,0.00038331037,0.0002504232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959673,0.003565487,0.00003387689,0.00017784347,0.00013677569,0.00011871108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014070153,0.00007177002,0.00016007741,0.000060145114,0.00010798482,0.00012233882,0.00035154007,0.000046917376,0.00008922216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032579352,0.000059915317,0.000020515203,0.00029826982,0.00029500408,0.0002584621,0.00007692663,0.00014064487,0.000008158178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015273644,0.000114549985,0.0063225543,0.0035133313,0.00004304981,0.000020687095,0.08839809,0.000080841506,0.0027742162,0.8730153,0.0037177647,0.021846902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083063653,0.00023914632,0.12328232,0.00692006,0.000938065,0.000022574517,0.7561607,0.0025727975,0.0050280415,0.061370037,0.04123495,0.0014007023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28967485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5548424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8116452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023558922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011325475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7150553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325008","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9193","title":"Multi-Functional Access to Justice Centres","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Athabasca University","keywords":"Economic Justice; Humanities; Political science; Computer science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0836400426144008,"score_gpt":0.38977966582438495,"score_spread":0.3061396232099841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7029956,0.0023587022,0.14139366,0.018777626,0.01788646,0.0026213354,0.00023983947,0.0012383427,0.11248844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842514,0.00022922912,0.002151853,0.0023773988,0.0025892064,0.00008800556,0.000012553841,0.000050284863,0.008250086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975772,0.00011983363,0.00040830078,0.00057930563,0.0007977932,0.0005175981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982183,0.0005238296,0.000081944105,0.00033771928,0.00042270523,0.0004154765],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050639396,0.00021703794,0.0002926383,0.00064845354,0.00053473876,0.0010563373,0.0010354718,0.0001255841,0.0021494194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000948689,0.00021904176,0.00018754088,0.002006154,0.00012839246,0.0011152275,0.0003761365,0.00024034546,0.0008873541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013620559,0.0021913429,0.00856314,0.0062295687,0.0015628326,0.00040762118,0.14020514,0.05606911,0.010317081,0.026680684,0.42115003,0.32526138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071629224,0.0002811413,0.029984305,0.0012669147,0.014208692,0.000012337859,0.25056568,0.00742919,0.0024242273,0.00022778305,0.6912193,0.0016641807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009310751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009578491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3235972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018899534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004183083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325020","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9192","title":"The Edmonton Encampment Litigation and The Charter Claims We Didn’t (Get to) Argue","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021828571736794724,"score_gpt":0.330714318828592,"score_spread":0.3088857470917973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47133824,0.0015718853,0.0024418188,0.3109911,0.0037926242,0.0024107217,0.00004964914,0.00014873159,0.20725521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99163496,0.00021945317,0.00006675612,0.0009571484,0.00079716335,0.00005799687,0.000002647621,0.000007693244,0.006256185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900454,0.00009730354,0.00017149186,0.00015455922,0.00041511544,0.0001569877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923635,0.00044365917,0.00004478999,0.0001082092,0.00010117207,0.00006584472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078810996,0.00006838949,0.00007718571,0.000045301946,0.000355627,0.00046679965,0.00032928493,0.000039540322,0.0000768726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015865151,0.000041561485,0.000036505782,0.00014742061,0.00014245705,0.00029573267,0.00007905515,0.00008539303,0.000076450466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009636074,0.000017761835,0.00021275875,0.0000576722,0.00003905807,0.0000014848343,0.023880547,0.000058277445,0.00034641096,0.9491812,0.008717795,0.017390694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042597376,0.00008317327,0.02401235,0.00039043862,0.00017338907,9.928751e-7,0.004151585,0.0012008665,0.0015593235,0.02726115,0.940502,0.00023878578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009912656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009226993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93178415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005987599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007567952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45013598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325040","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9066","title":"JUDGING ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES: OVERSIGHT, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND CITIZEN COMPLAINTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Public administration; Political science; Administrative law; Citizen science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.16068306877390293,"score_gpt":0.4724398080745329,"score_spread":0.31175673930062997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3416592,0.00021840725,0.00037292344,0.046654567,0.0013328735,0.0006162299,0.000053714695,0.00015616298,0.60893595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576735,0.000027743072,0.0005944704,0.0013914201,0.00037715377,0.000015605026,0.000004993636,0.000010697331,0.0018105501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989103,0.00010446188,0.00021952378,0.00025025537,0.00032478414,0.00019066675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985537,0.0008810296,0.00006797099,0.00014760056,0.00021954284,0.00013015833],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000654217,0.00009202756,0.0001319881,0.00017529553,0.00030382886,0.0007275012,0.00029473717,0.00006734497,0.001373423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008760641,0.000093947456,0.000029717108,0.0006566046,0.00022068007,0.0014488708,0.00009987604,0.00023365025,0.00010359641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016582833,0.00034620785,0.019292127,0.0011062946,0.00022712638,0.000023910834,0.23333712,0.00003856599,0.00093429524,0.6019589,0.12767054,0.0148991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025362443,0.00010110744,0.03735592,0.00027847145,0.00030665527,0.0000052924943,0.051401462,0.00013812225,0.0004964705,0.004158543,0.9051046,0.00039975403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017305611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007127828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77743405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009704583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326503","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9020","title":"Freedom of Religion in Canada – The Principled and the Pragmatic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Epistemology; Religious freedom; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.01642896819063336,"score_gpt":0.30095924036921995,"score_spread":0.2845302721785866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48167747,0.0029403325,0.00029743605,0.03399728,0.0010168188,0.0012219793,0.0000638113,0.00002654629,0.47875834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998659,0.00008939541,0.00007315793,0.00049701513,0.00011691671,0.000010812884,4.5263437e-7,0.0000034976886,0.0005497265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919313,0.00012481365,0.00018605033,0.000084686166,0.00028069882,0.00013059845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859446,0.0011395147,0.00005471809,0.00011458805,0.000053016138,0.00004369425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051684526,0.000049020837,0.00011924605,0.000033024622,0.000092644244,0.000044688306,0.00031285774,0.00001928465,0.000029306688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050468644,0.000029160808,0.000024421894,0.00024620868,0.0006410838,0.000092147886,0.000077644065,0.000088322806,0.0000020350083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002033892,0.0000043457803,0.0009138022,0.00011146422,0.000014303263,0.0000030281358,0.001893852,0.0002966059,0.0000074575173,0.99475294,0.0017907495,0.00019111461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012108373,0.00007053526,0.033383578,0.0012621259,0.0007656567,0.000008332478,0.015728604,0.0029715777,0.00013814746,0.008883327,0.9351287,0.00044858232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.908871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8125344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008851993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003235513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57396615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326514","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9019","title":"The Democratizing Influence of Intervention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0380645486569132,"score_gpt":0.3638239986170885,"score_spread":0.32575944996017525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87094957,0.003546133,0.0006493147,0.004813931,0.0008226389,0.00033096506,0.000009786697,0.00006181552,0.11881583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912494,0.0001712612,0.00005495117,0.00007616683,0.00019027671,0.000010234904,2.1643555e-7,0.0000030076885,0.0003689615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992547,0.000048851558,0.00019558425,0.0000985659,0.0002767668,0.00012554604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938524,0.00030926047,0.000051909912,0.0000699049,0.00014887984,0.000034778874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004624567,0.000047097015,0.00008473097,0.000046990815,0.00031590924,0.00009223986,0.00032154695,0.000027132633,0.000026251215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053212466,0.00003511477,0.0000542904,0.00031495612,0.00035439938,0.00026421095,0.000113888666,0.00006213929,0.000029084618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006391619,0.000053241176,0.0043788627,0.00027070925,0.00013392915,0.0000070925366,0.008235904,0.00089431735,0.0016961824,0.93997055,0.0034520368,0.040843252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005210702,0.00036219897,0.3201019,0.0048288233,0.0011016869,0.0000033533063,0.026443234,0.00034627825,0.0071490235,0.1376058,0.5007558,0.00078087515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029989711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011387755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80236477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028839993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011586528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4533567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326516","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8359","title":"Exploring the Importance of Criminal Legal Aid: A Canadian Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Criminal procedure; Humanities; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2401937323696118,"score_gpt":0.4306052977341825,"score_spread":0.19041156536457068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6011063,0.000030652853,0.000017864122,0.08442041,0.0009869827,0.0003555858,0.000021091719,0.000046028472,0.31301507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961131,0.000025686908,0.00018355357,0.0013484992,0.00047811103,0.00004420569,0.0000018644503,0.000009251714,0.0017956936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989759,0.00008271678,0.00020590663,0.00014186851,0.00032522067,0.00026840754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987171,0.0003436194,0.00012714602,0.00019797926,0.00047822358,0.00013589514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080237025,0.000062938256,0.000101162776,0.00021344103,0.00038883733,0.0001303101,0.0005066317,0.000028759565,0.0003508024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023024264,0.000056545457,0.000035372836,0.0015736189,0.00014364568,0.0011911648,0.000051467287,0.00019143602,0.00008469617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042366748,0.00004535869,0.008055751,0.000059703983,0.00004882446,0.000009098947,0.14216459,0.00037074464,0.00013207323,0.81183326,0.036285926,0.0009522699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017649792,0.000054108557,0.20484528,0.00007225922,0.00023001811,0.0000014941021,0.3267412,0.000029946348,0.00041273245,0.0021366037,0.465067,0.00023287405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46368104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3263125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8096967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014745603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019870484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6859805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326517","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9065","title":"La participation citoyenne des enfants qui défendent leurs droits devant les tribunaux : regard sur le contentieux des changements climatiques","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.13434045401087788,"score_gpt":0.38376784117560797,"score_spread":0.2494273871647301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491902,0.008369505,0.00038908297,0.0020026169,0.001268993,0.0006188992,0.0001663303,0.0000996703,0.037894696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800433,0.0038467795,0.00052414293,0.00025182855,0.0006888039,0.000087123364,0.00001827274,0.000056865407,0.014482885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970039,0.0005288984,0.0005864647,0.0004885545,0.00063242245,0.0007597691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865043,0.00043380246,0.00018715643,0.00026106872,0.00012645572,0.0003410905],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010361617,0.00031269828,0.00039933925,0.0001828554,0.00043613557,0.0004310258,0.00059741933,0.00025008278,0.00044917373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036925875,0.00032884016,0.00016483339,0.00051151076,0.0010989149,0.0014404235,0.00032167262,0.00025079495,0.00022556218],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005657517,0.0024116973,0.10507743,0.010687101,0.001084221,0.00024135811,0.14548741,0.0007514562,0.0062730354,0.17178564,0.017209474,0.53842545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002590966,0.0013912469,0.4108287,0.010401992,0.003649297,0.000020100506,0.02718607,0.0012985917,0.035023574,0.016153412,0.48922437,0.002231664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019411756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010714218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5361938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038551565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019584075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326522","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9025","title":"L’évolution de la partie VII de la loi sur les langues officielles : un objectif ambitieux à la recherche de moyens efficaces","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.11911858020465513,"score_gpt":0.35536331980651154,"score_spread":0.2362447396018564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25629425,0.07502609,0.0021695774,0.0020974544,0.0018751213,0.00038703455,0.00039460187,0.000336867,0.661419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505307,0.0030518554,0.002952982,0.0002472783,0.0042337314,0.00004185642,0.000011956443,0.00010140813,0.038828246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972705,0.0011314044,0.0003969247,0.0003674392,0.00027099752,0.0005627129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917869,0.0074772737,0.00010687561,0.00023336198,0.00020835917,0.0001872222],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020087208,0.0003094507,0.00038701703,0.00017719927,0.000398691,0.0006732501,0.00039082058,0.00043487787,0.0007340674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051606144,0.0003004905,0.00017952411,0.0001811596,0.0009769683,0.00013450476,0.00018095048,0.00082861306,0.00006342592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003118062,0.0012618367,0.0006624085,0.0071274685,0.0009229968,0.0010015632,0.2191865,0.0017731385,0.003712849,0.6182587,0.10357748,0.042203236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027529482,0.0001721936,0.002359842,0.0012745134,0.0011919698,0.000024213654,0.008169456,0.0019428042,0.0013259795,0.0027259632,0.9800712,0.0004665703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01120089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000944872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87649375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005054376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047742267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326532","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9067","title":"Un rond dans un carré: l’expérience professionnelle des spécialistes de la justice réparatrice dans le cadre d’un programme québécois de déjudiciarisation pour adultes","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04081260786727914,"score_gpt":0.34879418418495695,"score_spread":0.3079815763176778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9346016,0.014196275,0.014103622,0.009447129,0.0016367827,0.0010344553,0.00007945072,0.00024097829,0.02465973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846441,0.0010323238,0.008244687,0.00043131204,0.0017423172,0.0001344708,0.000008633132,0.00007892831,0.0036832173],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950744,0.0011577226,0.0007471967,0.000856793,0.0008840754,0.0012798219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960109,0.0021798578,0.00030945378,0.00043730353,0.00044309575,0.0006194118],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024249887,0.00047090076,0.0004996286,0.00019832188,0.0014965805,0.0007291305,0.0014896081,0.00050267205,0.00030305274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002352314,0.00049630925,0.0002194589,0.0018151116,0.0015764183,0.0016784959,0.0004038422,0.0006678637,0.00012221679],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003585877,0.0013576781,0.02210214,0.007767578,0.00030965183,0.0006987735,0.7110627,0.0035061634,0.017884225,0.14647904,0.0071638734,0.08130958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014324432,0.00088417396,0.1186844,0.010015971,0.011383314,0.0002647213,0.6832451,0.007447764,0.08246898,0.03513413,0.046263717,0.0027752474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20240186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023149561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1792523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080941996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028290192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326534","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9184","title":"Access to Administrative Justice as an Administrative Law Value: Designing an Inclusive and Accessible Administrative Justice System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Administrative law; Tribunal; Equity (law); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1772834996338298,"score_gpt":0.5093142697938282,"score_spread":0.3320307701599984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17249353,0.00037801187,0.009159043,0.035238925,0.004569073,0.0046697296,0.00048066585,0.00085229054,0.77215874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98400944,0.000033761557,0.007471747,0.0046051014,0.0017223451,0.0002981655,0.000045889014,0.00007903785,0.0017345074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465036,0.0011248322,0.0009865488,0.0012520681,0.0011951617,0.0007910168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375194,0.0024656819,0.00050421734,0.0006294224,0.001419886,0.0012288262],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021196469,0.0005347543,0.00060139,0.0005590712,0.0019513471,0.005267492,0.0018804654,0.0003405792,0.0004832504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029331066,0.0005549125,0.00008804881,0.0026089041,0.00059577305,0.0110315075,0.0005002122,0.0008979994,0.00017142044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006100367,0.00048074115,0.00009903535,0.0017773517,0.00018737893,0.00014909008,0.116125025,0.00021424404,0.0010210724,0.8733978,0.0040917974,0.0018464219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001381227,0.0048821094,0.005417972,0.0030660136,0.009122657,0.00012794125,0.7807041,0.0014930939,0.02066866,0.007901416,0.16206433,0.003170502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005792257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041447054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8654964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004513117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005405984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326958","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9064","title":"La clinique juridique comme espace de participation et de médiation","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13858562933235932,"score_gpt":0.5198529398461726,"score_spread":0.38126731051381335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7348908,0.0037564342,0.057224475,0.15231906,0.0036093227,0.002139152,0.00014697162,0.00029120393,0.045622554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94461685,0.002272427,0.0039492324,0.039200608,0.002028571,0.00020031795,0.000021979977,0.00009243713,0.007617578],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931535,0.0043624365,0.0008861507,0.00039382384,0.0003586466,0.0008454153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99200493,0.006512919,0.0002382665,0.00038979502,0.0002567608,0.0005973193],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008489988,0.00023931508,0.00043624436,0.000176032,0.00022297537,0.00009630703,0.00035862645,0.0011879761,0.0004680266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035883735,0.00025238234,0.0001306869,0.0005578123,0.00012698882,0.00055575493,0.00017820072,0.002735045,0.0003660216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003983928,0.000786529,0.026219083,0.038261946,0.0002606172,0.00016633539,0.40567788,0.0025590272,0.0010671007,0.09347112,0.3939152,0.037216753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097536854,0.00047711507,0.20411316,0.008646749,0.0010297493,0.000012100228,0.008133354,0.009579088,0.0007541202,0.0021877806,0.76359284,0.0004985483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027937735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007771725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39754453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006289605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009548837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326970","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9021","title":"Section 15: How Indigenous Use of the Charter Tool is About Returning to Respect Not Creating Equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press; University of Windsor; Yukon University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Equity (law); Repatriation; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Disadvantage; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Law; Sociology; Public administration; High Court; Freedom of information","score_opus":0.10521765265068823,"score_gpt":0.37993091320413935,"score_spread":0.27471326055345113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852017,0.00015668305,0.00009417761,0.0056112143,0.0010315423,0.00087402115,0.000044181797,0.000090038855,0.0068964097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99247766,0.00003510479,0.00045678706,0.00078809774,0.0009806847,0.00003274656,7.515487e-7,0.000019853067,0.0052083354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799746,0.00017168072,0.0002968164,0.0003409465,0.0007942596,0.0003988479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987476,0.00046113768,0.00015751724,0.0002462688,0.00028624447,0.00010123034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006935496,0.00016164493,0.00026749057,0.00009226293,0.00071937265,0.0006046263,0.0006013533,0.00012369727,0.00016897409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018463694,0.00011769423,0.0001371288,0.00069546717,0.00016719599,0.00077506783,0.0005443355,0.00027319818,0.000027599455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023574843,0.000104516876,0.017286113,0.0012788109,0.00037686626,0.000015791167,0.8764899,0.00047260613,0.054815993,0.0016666389,0.024375582,0.022881437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004762698,0.00036620512,0.6959612,0.0028801796,0.001054994,0.000003384076,0.035777666,0.0003215081,0.0591562,0.00013507652,0.20275594,0.0011113592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073862798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016707394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84071225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028991996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001361845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406327004","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9018","title":"The Importance of Effective Access to Justice for Charter Violations and the Role of the Court Challenges Program","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.035966301314531976,"score_gpt":0.3635254641516331,"score_spread":0.3275591628371011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406327004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49975604,0.058345504,0.001013967,0.18732364,0.003857784,0.021331772,0.00037947984,0.000210254,0.22778156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981765,0.00059616147,0.000060220256,0.0002293116,0.00035827045,0.00048959133,3.7796423e-7,0.0000071208983,0.00008244669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894816,0.00010278127,0.0002375364,0.00018344061,0.00033653303,0.00019155222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773544,0.0016237118,0.00012014767,0.00016528866,0.00030802726,0.00004739268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007859748,0.000095093805,0.00019496187,0.00003703649,0.00062958995,0.00012018616,0.000649151,0.00004474084,0.000007774027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008159051,0.000050124436,0.000086723616,0.00032556994,0.0008599017,0.00021157315,0.00025924115,0.00008949639,0.0000020199263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042014933,0.00011689772,0.00450154,0.00047510726,0.0003227433,5.218997e-7,0.022912804,0.00010600053,0.00019110742,0.8895121,0.0016900536,0.07975096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013532053,0.00053378195,0.43610367,0.0015817081,0.003912638,0.0000020728035,0.04851278,0.0010108508,0.0026012692,0.12269525,0.3810931,0.000599666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059730216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024181209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76681685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024685687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014396361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48423603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027655","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9559","title":"“Weaponizing” The Tort of Family Violence? Myths, Stereotypes, Lawyers’ Ethics and Access to Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Economic Justice; Mythology; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.14281429637353224,"score_gpt":0.4633369186579882,"score_spread":0.32052262228445594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33478245,0.00091783394,0.002791517,0.2240729,0.0041818167,0.002072386,0.000069632086,0.00011557388,0.43099588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761518,0.0003578446,0.0010962245,0.019435331,0.00032687603,0.00004363784,0.0000028784325,0.000014197594,0.0025711681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981017,0.0003503475,0.0004368658,0.0002928127,0.00054325064,0.00027500582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962993,0.002083444,0.00024260572,0.000392255,0.0008439421,0.00013843647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019336403,0.0001373487,0.0002239903,0.00024943898,0.00064958364,0.0004925571,0.0012130067,0.00016231579,0.00012879579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062827435,0.00012022432,0.000040310006,0.0015221554,0.0002902856,0.0010684773,0.0003709157,0.00064336945,0.00002566804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064762094,0.00070176966,0.011680151,0.0022731223,0.00034901363,0.000006582204,0.19023623,0.0005841546,0.0030629202,0.5798156,0.1561279,0.0545149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004627945,0.000117404416,0.10184762,0.0010396608,0.0011444823,0.0000010141263,0.07741053,0.00004365209,0.0016614831,0.0021953452,0.81362426,0.00045173158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006772214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014395778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6574964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006976575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015824565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027815","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9560","title":"Reflections on the TRC’s Mandate to Law Schools: Microscopic and Macroscopic Changes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11036744324900545,"score_gpt":0.4835372393179259,"score_spread":0.3731697960689205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09980158,0.00006215814,0.00019691905,0.45736188,0.0011329515,0.00074123876,0.000018026127,0.000052829153,0.4406324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94079304,0.00005280943,0.0007419518,0.04107833,0.0002728727,0.000108216715,0.0000017729319,0.000009212005,0.01694177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991538,0.000121217876,0.00015568014,0.0001965168,0.00018158459,0.00019118495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990556,0.00036836643,0.00006772986,0.00023296979,0.00018746885,0.000087858185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046877607,0.00008222984,0.000105997206,0.00017402008,0.0007497512,0.0005232958,0.00037890224,0.00005721728,0.00026066953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009954746,0.00006910739,0.000016076445,0.00092035095,0.00009783299,0.0003420119,0.00009654553,0.00024125048,0.00009795531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054074873,0.00009439294,0.00050603156,0.00007351032,0.00003596739,5.400373e-7,0.010552217,0.000013705696,0.0041440423,0.9216048,0.061324287,0.0015964083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013127823,0.000059592243,0.00632032,0.00015193975,0.00008142459,1.9342106e-7,0.0065365373,0.0000014834364,0.0042146076,0.001600958,0.9807974,0.000104258295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046664164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008335405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9200039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006253196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030654564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7054257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027943","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9558","title":"Homegrown Transplants: Procedural Borrowing in the New Ontario Class Proceedings Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Humanities; Computer science; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02304629522989342,"score_gpt":0.3038252372376791,"score_spread":0.2807789420077857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93355554,0.000044050452,0.0002434891,0.011086283,0.00014059144,0.00085240457,0.0000057555962,0.000042885098,0.05402899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916239,0.000014284618,0.00035440366,0.004516459,0.000096303396,0.000019400788,0.000012845773,0.000012228982,0.003350221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895936,0.00001131991,0.00030234596,0.00021757056,0.0003099298,0.00019945412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958885,0.00007110036,0.000058362522,0.00011604416,0.00009252807,0.00007309968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019187195,0.00013252356,0.00022041466,0.00030252876,0.000045395773,0.00006978492,0.00029624114,0.000082262355,0.00012677988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007053265,0.00010198466,0.00005271212,0.0005714865,0.000026655198,0.00034946145,0.000016467291,0.00026553206,0.000011640556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057431133,0.0012322427,0.8146093,0.009180189,0.00037672766,0.0001556494,0.06815823,0.00019739874,0.0338125,0.013803127,0.04367989,0.00905163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025054505,0.00012420198,0.97078156,0.0011055397,0.0006477345,0.000025751664,0.0009995983,0.00006852408,0.01035152,0.000106272186,0.013129951,0.00015391938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012510328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002553347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15617223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009829247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048161024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41588137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027959","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9182","title":"Reducing The “Justice Gap” Through Access to Unbundled Legal Services: Utilizing an A2J Measurement Framework to Measure Unbundling Effectiveness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Unbundling; Measure (data warehouse); Economic Justice; Business; Computer science; Telecommunications; Environmental economics; Political science; Database; Industrial organization; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1968630646339921,"score_gpt":0.44799136096002223,"score_spread":0.2511282963260301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4705974,0.0016247296,0.08697764,0.17147864,0.019577242,0.008774141,0.00008400656,0.0010489912,0.23983723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98515207,0.000025161122,0.0037252242,0.008366484,0.0021425004,0.00025253653,0.00000504046,0.00007007028,0.0002609368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995107,0.0009210911,0.000652189,0.0008466867,0.0017574405,0.0007156223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482816,0.0021830709,0.00020843421,0.0007924332,0.0015517432,0.00043613266],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005173961,0.0003431403,0.00038833736,0.00038291092,0.0013689667,0.0040955963,0.0022709458,0.00022363916,0.00042057628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057491665,0.00030209863,0.00011056582,0.0040598838,0.00012286138,0.0050046793,0.00041936402,0.00097053766,0.000238121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015126548,0.0013555739,0.0015266426,0.008462556,0.00092663744,0.000046414414,0.44109622,0.052153148,0.014722046,0.43743464,0.014511866,0.02625161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007541734,0.0006123664,0.01656016,0.012890581,0.004730687,0.000014979765,0.13815096,0.0013224082,0.010139586,0.00637923,0.80604845,0.0023963954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016681654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003833685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059482094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020598057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5251154","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4617","title":"The Sovereign, the Law and the Two British Empires","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Empire; Legitimacy; Colonialism; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Popular sovereignty; British Empire; Sociology","score_opus":0.025787596882030635,"score_gpt":0.34401413658256424,"score_spread":0.3182265397005336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5251154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024444854,0.0008012321,0.0002770519,0.00911068,0.00032143662,0.00036023668,0.000015778447,0.000021746475,0.964647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888605,0.00012237947,0.00006984894,0.007561514,0.00070927455,0.000007881427,4.117172e-7,0.0000058950295,0.0026623064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887913,0.000142736,0.00018392767,0.00011707371,0.00037679158,0.00030036256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997329,0.002173569,0.000090083115,0.00018626996,0.00012648373,0.000094587995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014803234,0.00006804903,0.00010735471,0.000011713301,0.001525316,0.0003445872,0.00067830994,0.00003270969,0.00006084568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050753565,0.000039403523,0.00004596676,0.00015573637,0.0040782406,0.00015540904,0.00015203704,0.000129841,0.000012685536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003961125,0.000006653258,0.00025370973,0.000004787124,0.000014973824,0.0000024812346,0.0009830211,0.000010879456,0.0000029904772,0.99490905,0.0021329096,0.0016389401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042614396,0.000018603863,0.0063827094,0.00003620473,0.00013756909,0.0000073969577,0.0066134343,0.000007647293,0.000056136596,0.013069979,0.9731187,0.00012542853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029670682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019663284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98183906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024005047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028285146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W69389177","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4533","title":"De-Conflicting Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Legislation: Khawaja and the Ongoing Challenges of the ‘Armed Conflict’ Exclusion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Legislation; Legislature; Armed conflict; Statutory law; Law; Counter terrorism; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04089942561944922,"score_gpt":0.33388674869970314,"score_spread":0.29298732308025394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W69389177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92921984,0.001085555,0.00013958302,0.039357908,0.00063832174,0.00058234663,0.000010538394,0.000030352032,0.02893554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965891,0.0003668012,0.000020459302,0.002219141,0.00046200035,0.000006865781,3.5687043e-7,0.000010012781,0.00032525868],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980668,0.00029480882,0.0003785702,0.00024145067,0.0006057886,0.00041257933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849164,0.0005932373,0.00025322818,0.00033306796,0.00017339729,0.00015544261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009786313,0.00015094626,0.00029556325,0.000055663502,0.00045712627,0.00008395351,0.0008212252,0.000106539366,0.000032606713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064784294,0.00010384212,0.00006897049,0.0001847996,0.0004023253,0.00026613515,0.00016536997,0.00021750515,0.0000012392534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039338958,0.00019342956,0.011974948,0.0004768121,0.00013293816,0.000019738445,0.8574932,0.0003553368,0.002081743,0.06004954,0.00264865,0.06418024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023937388,0.00018167122,0.6812172,0.0013488927,0.00056456064,0.000012066954,0.25180584,0.0009866373,0.0025636735,0.0013355656,0.05686696,0.0007232036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16459736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06692841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66924226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009641127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062514027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95009774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W84822421","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4361","title":"ESSENTIALISM MAKES FOR STRANGE BEDMATES: THE SUPREME COURT CASE OF J.A. AND THE INTERVENTION OF L.E.A.F.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Ideology; Conservatism; Jurisprudence; Law; Intervention (counseling); Convergence (economics); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047730681184722394,"score_gpt":0.36511387138368107,"score_spread":0.31738319019895866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W84822421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98018897,0.0027256927,0.0006346249,0.005012796,0.0006116861,0.0015079615,0.00012741846,0.000020257801,0.009170579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987385,0.000117149284,0.0002043233,0.00013303074,0.0003043805,0.000029785078,0.000001876842,0.000006850584,0.00046405505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913687,0.00014078809,0.0002479241,0.00008609784,0.00021514334,0.00017315599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989848,0.00040911668,0.00021073589,0.00015144963,0.00019412638,0.00004975422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013285979,0.00007119743,0.0001757332,0.000008722663,0.00022204324,0.000042489173,0.00034677263,0.0000797052,0.00009072867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025077857,0.00004214755,0.00013107664,0.00012957251,0.0006622426,0.0002865821,0.00007586692,0.00006847094,9.500901e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008194844,0.0006173386,0.0032124822,0.0030668036,0.0005531535,0.000003820558,0.511516,0.00008507206,0.002063806,0.44682488,0.024694921,0.006542287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009866937,0.0005036699,0.018003669,0.0014810725,0.007575035,0.000059773683,0.7583609,0.00046231734,0.02902338,0.017454753,0.1561779,0.0010305737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014859071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005744606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4293701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010138264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002383169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24400605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94846784","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4615","title":"The State of War Crimes Following the Israeli- Hezbollah War","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; War crime; Proportionality (law); Geopolitics; Law; State (computer science); International humanitarian law; International law; Politics; Spanish Civil War; Just war theory; Argument (complex analysis); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.030853394486466457,"score_gpt":0.3538859219393146,"score_spread":0.32303252745284816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94846784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8467028,0.00038458177,0.00023556252,0.0014213884,0.0009692722,0.00037284492,0.000008752399,0.000028843486,0.14987592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98901474,0.000036253543,0.00013016962,0.00042071866,0.00041934144,0.000004820211,7.275137e-7,0.000011977997,0.009961266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840534,0.000085297754,0.00033399658,0.00015009276,0.00070992473,0.0003153373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998478,0.0007910936,0.00016774124,0.00023170139,0.00025305405,0.000078425735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015780879,0.000094823365,0.00014530236,0.00006727512,0.00069063006,0.00007070305,0.001127901,0.000041216812,0.000080310914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028038665,0.000056551806,0.000119481956,0.00013496152,0.00028486966,0.00025714014,0.00012005263,0.00011574592,0.000045608707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028221303,0.00012235051,0.00072263816,0.00007503208,0.00024920717,0.000021110132,0.040418662,0.000281662,0.0012351112,0.94372284,0.006201615,0.006667544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014358418,0.0003654564,0.09719892,0.00050545874,0.00093887415,0.0000025263132,0.0173775,0.00013107018,0.0493479,0.16932043,0.6623558,0.0010202447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002557638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029964251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77440244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045198816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014100326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5311838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}