{"meta":{"query_hash":"96305924bf00","filters":{"venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice"},"cohort_total":277,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":277,"exported":277,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/96305924bf00","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Windsor+Yearbook+of+Access+to+Justice"},"results":[{"id":"W140134012","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4492","title":"Judging Fairness in Class Action Settlements","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Political science; Civil procedure; Doctrine; Face (sociological concept); Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; History; Epistemology; State (computer science); Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.043845894160854444,"score_gpt":0.313256852687802,"score_spread":0.2694109585269476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140134012","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0897625,0.008030512,0.5642375,0.051129084,0.0068171364,0.0023408018,0.00021124906,0.0004652196,0.27700603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8301815,0.001431221,0.14912304,0.0041386764,0.0029047308,0.0008450875,0.000091043075,0.00016436227,0.011120343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.79060584,0.120183274,0.014193225,0.01563213,0.05087235,0.008513125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69523424,0.22232275,0.015779128,0.017695624,0.044609297,0.0043589557],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21519947,0.00094710634,0.0027517932,0.00796424,0.012498483,0.018924441,0.004925104,0.012028411,0.006385812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.441365,0.0008239269,0.0015894203,0.00260233,0.031498406,0.019104324,0.011772073,0.009152127,0.0011229358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007832075,0.000031306423,0.001476796,0.00012600028,0.000038112725,0.0002201931,0.0041167806,0.0012498213,0.00027000168,0.9593572,0.004501811,0.028533693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008862809,0.0000732734,0.001173109,0.00036407623,0.000054359964,0.00011987574,0.0017250981,0.0053829686,0.0011049217,0.95615774,0.033662938,0.000092989845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068291435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21519947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008410121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015018175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96779877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145186697","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4486","title":"Restricted Access to Justice for Canadians Mistreated Abroad: Abdelrazik v Canada (Re: Interim Costs)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Interim; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Law; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Supreme court","score_opus":0.06186903985694005,"score_gpt":0.35474511483047955,"score_spread":0.2928760749735395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145186697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07217831,0.012224791,0.0007834148,0.2614668,0.0018782994,0.00011848359,0.0009753498,0.00009372868,0.6502808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5448125,0.0069985394,0.000869085,0.1852364,0.000526774,0.00011036182,0.00032282344,0.00009468833,0.26102883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961636,0.00015461816,0.000060432812,0.00021950663,0.0011809258,0.0022209052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802065,0.00038573836,0.00009292731,0.000068498026,0.0008221354,0.0006101024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014175457,0.00039069998,0.00032700735,0.001029188,0.023795458,0.007936226,0.0022710208,0.011677755,0.0069236425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042313603,0.00047462934,0.00058824057,0.0014906191,0.0063829445,0.0019146483,0.0025490895,0.008897854,0.00053909235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029587029,0.000032750293,0.0053284494,0.00009918039,0.000022499997,0.0018955166,0.010281419,0.00040404705,0.00041913777,0.4511131,0.5066084,0.0237658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004540814,0.00003425005,0.023538401,0.00064907654,0.000105589774,0.0008767732,0.015540309,0.0005342998,0.0006197776,0.01788547,0.9399415,0.0002291317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99142504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99689674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06509527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06509527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13634096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47230142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1479723212","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4319","title":"OVERCOMING OBSTACLES TO IMPLEMENTING THE UN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Political science; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.02855156058988326,"score_gpt":0.302471316595245,"score_spread":0.2739197560053617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1479723212","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25862586,0.02002706,0.0046989415,0.4528152,0.0018350909,0.00047644915,0.00021452463,0.00018828704,0.26111853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8747247,0.014988904,0.008592554,0.042481564,0.00020440095,0.00012856821,0.00016085991,0.00009879001,0.05861972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791413,0.0027537665,0.0005141897,0.0006298527,0.008006248,0.008954681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98229605,0.0046495344,0.00087183714,0.0003424605,0.0067868354,0.005053283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013926639,0.00039836363,0.00044570147,0.0016677919,0.031266347,0.009307788,0.0031812433,0.0042384043,0.0037482113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024158705,0.0004819691,0.00062113494,0.002073719,0.008763127,0.0027196256,0.006900449,0.007982828,0.00021812327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091898386,0.00025976548,0.030707149,0.0012041646,0.000099768644,0.0057487045,0.17168517,0.0037359993,0.003010522,0.3357318,0.15421177,0.29351324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031829342,0.00009024477,0.043952174,0.0020456205,0.000103426595,0.00044348504,0.2129955,0.0021243293,0.0020460498,0.016568555,0.7192734,0.0003254352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99406743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1598553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1598553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48213482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97444874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491303487","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4567","title":"Access to Justice for the Wrongfully Accused in National Security Investigations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Complaint; Commission; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Law; Terrorism; National security; Espionage; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.09509475235539169,"score_gpt":0.40925083648437155,"score_spread":0.3141560841289799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491303487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23660763,0.0035214126,0.013401078,0.059693765,0.00030360234,0.000265477,0.000114124545,0.000159541,0.6859334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96830475,0.0012200862,0.0013681328,0.0038667298,0.00007795095,0.00007559121,0.000021702443,0.000018628343,0.025046498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98946345,0.0045296005,0.0004424339,0.00057113625,0.0015607044,0.003432579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98919475,0.006345431,0.0014910128,0.0010855896,0.001051898,0.00083132554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058992873,0.0003049399,0.00036168436,0.001708462,0.016466113,0.00842333,0.0017571686,0.0063462574,0.0091692535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019587392,0.00048892695,0.00043801262,0.0011086657,0.017353257,0.00628175,0.010443228,0.0047354004,0.0012359286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004298398,0.00016082978,0.016456986,0.00015667011,0.00002852851,0.006226825,0.17301925,0.0003960206,0.0014701727,0.71261156,0.017681925,0.07174824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050340484,0.00027111731,0.023648087,0.0013745854,0.00012967532,0.008305895,0.256556,0.0015225653,0.0037376052,0.21656488,0.48762375,0.00021551116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05227998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087088354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05227998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061238226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015404555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103951335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495515455","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4538","title":"Creeping Capitalism and Academic Culture at a Canadian Law School","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporatization; Scholarship; Restructuring; Commodification; Academic freedom; Marketization; Capitalism; Autonomy; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law; Higher education; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.09399959374712731,"score_gpt":0.3947832737597534,"score_spread":0.3007836800126261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495515455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98585826,0.00017646364,0.0000548324,0.0013375919,0.00001142869,0.000013406881,0.00004026077,0.0000033216813,0.012504469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805355,0.00013344124,0.00004460988,0.00012139956,0.0000025731238,0.0000031369832,0.000018048599,0.000002224677,0.001620944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954749,0.0005862285,0.00007774295,0.00028746124,0.001678813,0.0018948944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920047,0.0008940412,0.00087613706,0.00016643506,0.0024031284,0.0036555375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002688663,0.00019577566,0.0004004908,0.0034283136,0.033055726,0.009030869,0.001915467,0.0007957306,0.0039626127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006792492,0.00023417691,0.00028255512,0.0045106728,0.011782167,0.0016633146,0.005027591,0.0023545518,0.00017678694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114114955,0.00036141847,0.38260022,0.000064329084,0.000039573722,0.00080861256,0.5235028,0.000455861,0.0010455408,0.035882458,0.005089808,0.050035205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108640015,0.00007244764,0.40899935,0.00010485774,0.00001899644,0.00011988454,0.5651298,0.000410734,0.00039259196,0.0013909922,0.02328437,0.000065123866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98360056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11733063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113638654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8512973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498048561","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4490","title":"Mediation in Guardianship Proceedings for the Elderly: An Australian Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Mediation; Tribunal; Adjudication; Legislature; Conciliation; Political science; Law; Legislation; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Business","score_opus":0.05974593685152559,"score_gpt":0.3905966113846639,"score_spread":0.3308506745331383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498048561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1445165,0.30045944,0.004546052,0.3622242,0.0024079606,0.00019331696,0.00005647281,0.00003989089,0.18555619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7716769,0.15294333,0.0037980163,0.040407676,0.0022455084,0.00012827868,0.000025988453,0.000022787239,0.02875157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98997706,0.0064899293,0.00055498764,0.00048748445,0.0011141442,0.0013763934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340856,0.003330287,0.0006536617,0.00021012833,0.0011989463,0.0011984061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014774567,0.0003680428,0.00058652414,0.0018747476,0.0073236455,0.0072676996,0.0024233423,0.008345745,0.0047914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016444443,0.00038521344,0.0006408237,0.0015503147,0.010396362,0.004822764,0.008987704,0.0048152953,0.00044293446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021247129,0.00037234224,0.0069555035,0.002117761,0.00004377081,0.007337002,0.18607582,0.0008418398,0.0007860926,0.6293208,0.024001727,0.1419349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009116782,0.0008595547,0.028906712,0.009530727,0.00018966007,0.0060415803,0.10457051,0.001606152,0.0008270703,0.1144771,0.73271346,0.00018623793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073722385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07331586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073722385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011771573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017600834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14658654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501971436","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4541","title":"The Exploitation of Vulnerability: Dimensions of Citizenship and Rightlessness in Canada’s Security Certificate Legislation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Carleton University","keywords":"Statelessness; Citizenship; Political science; Vulnerability (computing); Deportation; Agency (philosophy); Exploit; Legislation; National security; Certificate; Naturalisation; Law; Computer security; Sociology; Immigration; Politics","score_opus":0.08796027915575023,"score_gpt":0.3232802954573143,"score_spread":0.23532001630156407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501971436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87780863,0.0008945026,0.00095977925,0.016490659,0.000041691146,0.00007521237,0.00012799105,0.000015326174,0.1035863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627894,0.0003102572,0.0001585839,0.00046340632,0.0000040974064,0.000011828343,0.000021723561,0.0000053342396,0.0027458654],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943903,0.00080643175,0.000106662854,0.00030914202,0.0020565246,0.0023308522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951492,0.0014998105,0.00071546185,0.00020791701,0.0015002704,0.0009272691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033106932,0.00027953694,0.0004217363,0.0032893396,0.02858178,0.009809456,0.001550931,0.0017185818,0.002839805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007901642,0.00029735317,0.00062225544,0.0048190146,0.034746476,0.0037246111,0.008870026,0.0038752493,0.00007236425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004536916,0.000090409776,0.111923516,0.00009932024,0.000040832416,0.001120085,0.49723706,0.0008729465,0.00047857338,0.35853314,0.005444922,0.024113892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013757226,0.000028794026,0.24971461,0.0004092214,0.000057981433,0.00030586825,0.6455935,0.0013171004,0.0003714822,0.025634386,0.07640855,0.00014474575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16331114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16331114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1757161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9704405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505233863","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4309","title":"LA CYBERJUSTICE COMME RÉPONSE AUX BESOINS JURIDIQUES DES PERSONNES ITINÉRANTES: SON POTENTIEL ET SES EMBÛCHES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050029427945846174,"score_gpt":0.30590958870803,"score_spread":0.2558801607621838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505233863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8068722,0.04182732,0.0047186045,0.020722773,0.00078488345,0.00008793179,0.0005124318,0.00006183335,0.12441206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97240025,0.013952468,0.0010436524,0.0006830726,0.00043026058,0.000046391742,0.0001081935,0.000019825638,0.011315761],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971071,0.0015677997,0.00010625237,0.00022859163,0.0006614943,0.00032879764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985005,0.008296084,0.0037357165,0.0003311197,0.0017297557,0.00090228155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037028298,0.00034166648,0.00045106933,0.0024366272,0.0021772129,0.005479142,0.000720597,0.0021505277,0.010718409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029207116,0.00029023527,0.000387942,0.0016150614,0.003869191,0.0048935884,0.0021176704,0.003909381,0.0012437067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006214111,0.00055186567,0.3741693,0.0009407627,0.0001518839,0.005654708,0.14171554,0.00076672796,0.002396346,0.11813836,0.016787963,0.33810517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027890796,0.00040596531,0.72818214,0.0022239368,0.00010577751,0.008652387,0.117179304,0.001252652,0.0017918615,0.020326106,0.1196173,0.0002347034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017895686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025358398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017895686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026182313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018453697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035856664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508301403","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4500","title":"A Wavering Commitment? Administrative Independence and Collaborative Governance in Ontario’s Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability Legislation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Statute; Legislation; Independence (probability theory); Corporate governance; Public administration; Legislature; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.05378763993765281,"score_gpt":0.37590865109594346,"score_spread":0.32212101115829067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508301403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18256699,0.0019705691,0.004363428,0.1625088,0.0004646378,0.0001720531,0.00010365691,0.00004485043,0.64780486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062501,0.00070045766,0.0012709519,0.00645075,0.00007859966,0.00008097321,0.000028925184,0.000021181582,0.08511799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990669,0.0018558035,0.00030482665,0.00056315435,0.0027430686,0.0038641396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929376,0.0025756005,0.00071532483,0.00046261874,0.0014052341,0.0019036365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051724864,0.0001718748,0.00021805154,0.0006791979,0.033666227,0.010573936,0.001529755,0.004010345,0.0048250165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010847216,0.00045597894,0.0002728899,0.0015710576,0.023032727,0.0038613891,0.005920056,0.0058395066,0.0003272709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021363614,0.000036077876,0.0044261524,0.00005000965,0.0000069137386,0.0006947316,0.06587778,0.0003716804,0.00036409436,0.88629663,0.028841874,0.013012696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005518034,0.00004005808,0.029246569,0.00032615464,0.000023517981,0.00025170585,0.06898221,0.0010265118,0.0005477644,0.06315713,0.8362306,0.00011252859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95389867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9044102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09558984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12302759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6935561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510901266","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4362","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS OF INDEPENDENT COURTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Judicial independence; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Independence (probability theory); Separation of powers; Commit; Constitutional law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Legislature; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07902777010930453,"score_gpt":0.36232026323610345,"score_spread":0.28329249312679894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510901266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16926147,0.009035416,0.003587036,0.0593304,0.00015452011,0.000033184908,0.00012743125,0.000037202568,0.7584333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98935527,0.001957806,0.0004056481,0.001596299,0.000057736146,0.000015279093,0.000021552358,0.000009120935,0.0065812115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894048,0.0020613885,0.00024891712,0.00080253556,0.0038392644,0.0036432059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861604,0.006685631,0.0011164789,0.0011698735,0.0025157449,0.0023517904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005754059,0.00022473735,0.00046460348,0.0027575372,0.02045794,0.014166411,0.0018586419,0.003216209,0.006183377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017804706,0.00039654475,0.00036279266,0.0025097812,0.061674427,0.006091286,0.007389421,0.005544488,0.0002571464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059824256,0.000012276486,0.0010155295,0.000014157815,0.0000045462048,0.00006542244,0.008016372,0.00013731592,0.0000658886,0.982544,0.0016802051,0.0064381734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045965324,0.000038231818,0.023816124,0.0005298259,0.000049273265,0.00018563024,0.025240788,0.00089045084,0.00029080448,0.74704516,0.20176883,0.000098959645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8293827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87062013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8293827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049796026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07620895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3612972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512049890","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4497","title":"TRANSNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: PAPERS FROM THE SIXTH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DISCUSSION FORUM, QUÉBEC CITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Accountability; Law; Windsor; Adjudication; Comparative law; Public administration; International law; State (computer science); Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.10194180228626822,"score_gpt":0.3794893752739952,"score_spread":0.277547572987727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512049890","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07974194,0.057021927,0.00041647593,0.6341737,0.010818472,0.00028550415,0.007851177,0.00011316141,0.20957766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45539597,0.025546694,0.00078461756,0.044093788,0.00309467,0.00082082546,0.004359733,0.0003230636,0.4655807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944924,0.0011611329,0.00011875188,0.0004586159,0.0016169759,0.0021521295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855112,0.003384078,0.0005829195,0.0004839096,0.00520929,0.004828567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01003938,0.0007519241,0.0011346142,0.003506918,0.043998048,0.016894681,0.003520321,0.008773446,0.042666733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012348493,0.00077981513,0.0005830898,0.009968956,0.007018575,0.0051121525,0.004707157,0.0071793045,0.0024581486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001359559,0.000182335,0.0038469017,0.00018940757,0.000024235313,0.00028242616,0.035998993,0.00015161754,0.00023087891,0.02148367,0.9202142,0.017259503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053051794,0.000018794732,0.027322216,0.0006380727,0.000017478284,0.000029351735,0.055314492,0.00014601473,0.00015196239,0.0011741114,0.91505116,0.00008321794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15936325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15145913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97501945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514920947","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4528","title":"The Scope of the Obligation to Respect and to Ensure Respect for International Humanitarian Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; International humanitarian law; Geneva Conventions; Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; International law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.040371565185325295,"score_gpt":0.36079920651107594,"score_spread":0.32042764132575063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514920947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029414933,0.010096175,0.045867823,0.15049559,0.0015469886,0.00011463345,0.00013970013,0.00008388065,0.76224035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305493,0.0048096506,0.01137447,0.02558792,0.0017463621,0.00032809572,0.00008942895,0.000106776235,0.025407959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758891,0.011465936,0.0014110258,0.002298355,0.006627611,0.0023080353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98329306,0.010895666,0.0009733612,0.0020111648,0.001914119,0.0009125287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027325,0.0003980457,0.0007571302,0.0017167659,0.00608745,0.013255694,0.0021419076,0.010389192,0.0027842817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02305404,0.0005573882,0.00065107737,0.001206542,0.06897808,0.011721433,0.0084156785,0.0115060005,0.00058009644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025671034,0.0000045515817,0.00005736942,0.000013547521,9.3892453e-7,0.000013841585,0.0017368061,0.000048984217,0.000037165493,0.9949334,0.0011390741,0.002011785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013060171,0.000021558923,0.0005678913,0.0003737893,0.0000060943094,0.00008396575,0.0024447255,0.00020839855,0.00013605495,0.93130356,0.06481093,0.000029985686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009818037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009590143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005934334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015114415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14451015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516494379","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4489","title":"Brave New Words: Labour, The Courts and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Supreme court; Charter; Collective bargaining; Political science; Law; Labour law; Politics; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.014987846948611636,"score_gpt":0.286951074143666,"score_spread":0.27196322719505434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516494379","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010507772,0.086406395,0.0021349534,0.5591283,0.003582388,0.00003696616,0.000943649,0.000059489146,0.33720013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4728307,0.051978648,0.0027493439,0.16074148,0.0028990847,0.000078331446,0.00045952367,0.000148822,0.30811408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960424,0.00063698203,0.0000925821,0.0003419857,0.0019297138,0.00095634226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725574,0.0013435509,0.00012708225,0.00009857988,0.0009029052,0.00027217896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022480248,0.0006284075,0.00038257646,0.0018356644,0.020920321,0.013008069,0.0024991874,0.008631777,0.011518563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058653858,0.00037731242,0.00028821817,0.0039412505,0.02274315,0.0071097966,0.0020622488,0.007955783,0.00082007353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014086866,0.000009588139,0.0004272747,0.000059006205,0.0000034530506,0.00013556093,0.011462021,0.000103657534,0.00010409738,0.69162065,0.2817512,0.0143094715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011841874,0.0000060246975,0.0023269593,0.00048359204,0.000009726434,0.00007062934,0.013558332,0.00014058249,0.00018592174,0.072716184,0.9104353,0.00005490571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9721409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06595657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06595657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08613922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47855067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519716147","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4499","title":"The Merits of “Merits” Review: A Comparative Look at the Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Adjudication; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Enforcement; Legitimacy; Administrative law; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1242210924432735,"score_gpt":0.4465505210113872,"score_spread":0.3223294285681137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519716147","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06257676,0.4766691,0.0018779745,0.1488348,0.0063131587,0.00029532274,0.00017898176,0.000045559827,0.30320832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7049684,0.19373477,0.0027487816,0.06589202,0.008861869,0.0003291971,0.00023243627,0.000080557285,0.023151897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360927,0.029703604,0.0045235427,0.001816355,0.0240299,0.003833924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85627013,0.08557827,0.009974626,0.0031492799,0.04103471,0.0039930055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06483009,0.00023107644,0.0013378928,0.016942894,0.005438138,0.013709548,0.0018512241,0.0053783604,0.0045368033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15848,0.0005718074,0.0009231907,0.01285684,0.006731551,0.007196915,0.0045054215,0.0027551607,0.0005454489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006492558,0.00017470494,0.0167962,0.010540466,0.000463678,0.0022568433,0.027277118,0.0009188585,0.0011681386,0.5047197,0.1138198,0.32121527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012868448,0.0005448919,0.07267599,0.0074602407,0.0005336586,0.001202594,0.010995101,0.00051851093,0.00033429757,0.028849518,0.87663364,0.00012289562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03589277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11377705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06483009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017008748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025966376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34285837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527372535","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4614","title":"I CAN SEE CLEARLY NOW: VIDEOCONFERENCE HEARINGS AND THE LEGAL LIMIT ON HOW TRIBUNALS ALLOCATE RESOURCES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Videoconferencing; Political science; Law; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Telecommunications; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04114657717530011,"score_gpt":0.3268015283295251,"score_spread":0.28565495115422496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527372535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046374388,0.0071377796,0.004544625,0.49285808,0.0018429575,0.00006240311,0.00021370017,0.00008920174,0.44687688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67865074,0.0058486746,0.00253315,0.09638189,0.0009785187,0.000092662485,0.00017217963,0.00012320458,0.215219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687093,0.0006410305,0.000057112637,0.00033996272,0.0008710992,0.0012198928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736446,0.0009475931,0.00019311282,0.00015794845,0.0007058353,0.00063107716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026852922,0.00027352653,0.00026430664,0.0006068338,0.0152783,0.013060449,0.0025905801,0.0062993597,0.024193674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075723305,0.00021778226,0.00024133654,0.00094288087,0.016568158,0.008297168,0.0037944955,0.0070076967,0.002260855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032543674,0.0000436512,0.003299851,0.00011161212,0.0000047777307,0.00073294673,0.0455345,0.00016314055,0.0005804606,0.68378645,0.21667095,0.049039043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000125252855,0.000023331348,0.0048506586,0.00036935628,0.000009677711,0.00022795824,0.060219135,0.00030048663,0.000430386,0.043605395,0.88989925,0.0000517713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6545018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7427675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6545018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021400372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019102603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6950658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529402481","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4494","title":"Pre-Trial Detention and Control Orders Under British Anti-Terror Legislation Post 9/11: Balancing a Need for Security with the European Convention on Human Rights – An Overview","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Terrorism; Human rights; Legislation; Convention; Statutory law; Preventive detention; Criminal law","score_opus":0.0548211256583791,"score_gpt":0.35576050756856986,"score_spread":0.30093938191019076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529402481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0878422,0.20440555,0.008213723,0.026264807,0.0021612612,0.00040544593,0.0012442229,0.00038589505,0.6690769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42808565,0.18046442,0.0075288727,0.0069881855,0.0014621967,0.00022623752,0.0024129376,0.00024787613,0.3725836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955224,0.00071608997,0.00028028476,0.00020850678,0.0025551745,0.0007174612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978276,0.0006379107,0.00020593307,0.0001266135,0.0009846954,0.00021726816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018657509,0.00018927854,0.00022967612,0.0027013791,0.0014123545,0.004617462,0.0007158127,0.0019179644,0.007870203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031216997,0.0003617895,0.00022208852,0.003064356,0.0017451413,0.0019612666,0.0010426973,0.0015300994,0.0019164927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013226195,0.00016553316,0.005610636,0.0026034163,0.000019633202,0.0010873281,0.005735229,0.0012774619,0.0018924495,0.22200517,0.1282643,0.6312066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069279695,0.000069622685,0.027413042,0.00065059535,0.00000569405,0.00045368358,0.0008982657,0.00015661835,0.00039815714,0.004182958,0.96573645,0.000027902603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101725355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14706722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101725355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007910008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008571036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20226645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532262214","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4565","title":"Strengthening Social Justice in Informal Dispute Resolution Processes Through Cultural Competence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Mandate; Competence (human resources); Restorative justice; Sociology; Law; Economic Justice; Mediation; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04038906435525123,"score_gpt":0.29977320043594174,"score_spread":0.2593841360806905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532262214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09738644,0.0036281794,0.113169864,0.100189365,0.0005961466,0.00042556395,0.00003059155,0.00014413917,0.6844297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96199834,0.00091763394,0.017974148,0.004387563,0.00016554336,0.0002474871,0.000016994338,0.00004981399,0.014242483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95666784,0.033447802,0.001176227,0.0020302422,0.0033773743,0.0033004924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96035403,0.029213192,0.0024991098,0.003412817,0.00191607,0.002604682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04509998,0.00051188987,0.00051734125,0.002185805,0.01303855,0.01742253,0.0023336802,0.004887351,0.007108184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047461517,0.0005348254,0.0008705391,0.0011278812,0.067114,0.015048161,0.0308738,0.007271946,0.0010287052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013306667,0.00007583592,0.000851185,0.00008465039,0.0000137464385,0.00021924732,0.060959794,0.000689915,0.00027327982,0.90210235,0.0028396086,0.03187704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005230428,0.000047333888,0.0010121542,0.00046359334,0.00001395891,0.00014494007,0.02407839,0.0011281945,0.0005732248,0.84171385,0.13073112,0.00004094114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008265455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00942851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04509998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008533399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018829137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23851436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539021491","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4488","title":"The International Criminal Court and Non-Party States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statute; Criminal court; Declaration; Original jurisdiction; International law","score_opus":0.024809370477268774,"score_gpt":0.34007690567091314,"score_spread":0.31526753519364437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539021491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03838975,0.009133159,0.0016366298,0.012927296,0.0003315323,0.000036802263,0.00005276152,0.000010098746,0.93748194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277018,0.0068471655,0.00055854296,0.0047473097,0.0005005909,0.00006393847,0.000085720676,0.000019573428,0.05947531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917275,0.0033125442,0.0003143364,0.0006928838,0.0016755833,0.0022772148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99401927,0.0031125164,0.0009591912,0.0005387353,0.00057247793,0.0007978417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029884188,0.00024409941,0.00034590092,0.002162968,0.007723415,0.011085173,0.0008535506,0.003285838,0.012619993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009946274,0.00023350315,0.0003426065,0.0032410303,0.014590398,0.006508976,0.0070468322,0.005397098,0.0005740605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052870714,0.000011474604,0.0007652006,0.000010619523,0.0000027103515,0.00009795015,0.0011963537,0.000058079557,0.000019613713,0.9902249,0.0028107036,0.0047970936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027837754,0.00004584534,0.013463224,0.0007577247,0.000027195383,0.00040469813,0.011293484,0.0005941627,0.00021980006,0.6950708,0.27804452,0.000050703497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023446647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036954977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023446647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059290566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008247186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04662037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540821484","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4312","title":"A BRIEF GENEALOGY OF STATE SECRECY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Intelligence, Security, War Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Office of the Director of National Intelligence","keywords":"Secrecy; Variety (cybernetics); State (computer science); Law; Government (linguistics); Discipline; Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; History; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04921784576711771,"score_gpt":0.3539854025492005,"score_spread":0.3047675567820828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540821484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028291605,0.05971979,0.0124103455,0.03680704,0.0024615698,0.00007910349,0.0006079249,0.00012484906,0.8594978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6594685,0.10944291,0.005609612,0.008187813,0.002297778,0.0001492959,0.00062694284,0.00013500488,0.2140822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969184,0.00012620486,0.000016020116,0.000062341845,0.000047107213,0.00005662918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995696,0.0002785047,0.00004043242,0.00004094638,0.000042054253,0.000028486747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004930165,0.00024880326,0.0001840076,0.0017461476,0.0035563393,0.0031024313,0.0003190332,0.001249748,0.008676466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012777287,0.00019677427,0.00019278917,0.0020927994,0.008594668,0.005300731,0.0013341754,0.0022688576,0.0011504825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050508525,0.0000038059318,0.00029262717,0.000028527209,0.0000013789298,0.00009365127,0.0032405383,0.00013560106,0.000048626716,0.9795384,0.005406935,0.011204872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025868069,0.00001973644,0.0014931167,0.00027909063,0.000004233449,0.00032434534,0.0019905383,0.00018037757,0.00013744483,0.24114661,0.7544095,0.000012426707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013988609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012634254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013988609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002843314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014492928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029025674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554530639","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4561","title":"Gender and Professionalism in Law: The Challenge of (Women’s) Biography","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Legal history; Law; Biography; Political science; Legal realism; Legal education; Gender studies; Legal writing; Legal practice; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.11194327707706998,"score_gpt":0.4279801340191505,"score_spread":0.31603685694208056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554530639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14610428,0.040316578,0.0039584166,0.24203365,0.00391453,0.000040862422,0.0001004799,0.000051733183,0.56347954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92998284,0.012842209,0.00059519906,0.012334777,0.0011361599,0.000047266738,0.000021051059,0.000055461565,0.04298507],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970794,0.002066608,0.000049074,0.00016922306,0.00028953564,0.0003461711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952539,0.0034797683,0.00031618087,0.000170538,0.00023799467,0.0005415662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032864488,0.00041086835,0.00037629803,0.0013590566,0.01536058,0.009808724,0.0010028353,0.0027088893,0.00409969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051078326,0.00028664357,0.00013671514,0.0014895493,0.041344766,0.008879224,0.0035611927,0.0056805825,0.00052800006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093681265,0.000017312732,0.00048331593,0.00006199981,0.000002505658,0.00029625828,0.67428917,0.000034077577,0.00009121155,0.30147922,0.014062534,0.009173008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004394633,0.000029049923,0.0007105648,0.00042407715,0.0000041286116,0.00055786356,0.41520986,0.00006707617,0.00016596967,0.04483443,0.53798217,0.000010399085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012571565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016212186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01536058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005899145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004033261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0428015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554624967","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4311","title":"MADE YOU LOOK: NIQABS, THE MUSLIM CANADIAN CONGRESS, AND R V NS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Mainstream; Humanities; Plaintiff; Political science; Supreme court; Ethnology; Religious studies; Sociology; Law; Art; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027964681685092137,"score_gpt":0.3053970399168472,"score_spread":0.27743235823175505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554624967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089670695,0.0128069315,0.0004539492,0.14154357,0.0018931299,0.000032539134,0.00033266665,0.0000477494,0.7532187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7454424,0.006839868,0.0004343528,0.02755574,0.00033092193,0.000019379819,0.000117089454,0.00005188346,0.21920845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984748,0.00019590858,0.000012122069,0.000083795334,0.0006170581,0.0006163864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933004,0.000110644636,0.000033978926,0.000024620558,0.00027025118,0.00023042822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089954067,0.0003080742,0.00019829119,0.0010534007,0.031424426,0.006151706,0.00080958963,0.0025675187,0.008839272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019221187,0.00019609625,0.00026666443,0.0014664871,0.0111911995,0.001498423,0.0018294392,0.0035908548,0.00057178177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005415113,0.000029086024,0.0056956415,0.00010070193,0.00002233321,0.0012197705,0.099692665,0.0002587122,0.0006763242,0.48618507,0.3713818,0.0346837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072121434,0.000009240267,0.007975959,0.00018127463,0.000017628086,0.00025041748,0.09376929,0.00008874985,0.00033226347,0.0069555473,0.8903522,0.00006012169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056239814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056239814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055124566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4080503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564531687","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4536","title":"The Scales of Injustice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Consequentialism; Injustice; Argument (complex analysis); Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07080626815006953,"score_gpt":0.26008144673894307,"score_spread":0.18927517858887355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564531687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21385637,0.008743426,0.044902775,0.03619683,0.0006227884,0.00019674489,0.00062559877,0.00018701032,0.6946685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889072,0.0013200557,0.002483793,0.0008013796,0.00028343566,0.00007956473,0.00007761309,0.000035449044,0.0060115135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993715,0.002032866,0.0003274685,0.0007105753,0.00264366,0.0005705143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98117185,0.0059440057,0.004140151,0.0038124335,0.003062192,0.0018694111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033092047,0.000430986,0.0004114959,0.0043567917,0.001857349,0.006502553,0.0009381633,0.0015682366,0.008385472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028078582,0.00025359602,0.00041119082,0.0024840836,0.017314976,0.007742213,0.007470052,0.0036659215,0.00060197734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034162327,0.000038354727,0.008325692,0.000050365346,0.000026161313,0.00006566249,0.002776045,0.00061355473,0.0001766484,0.96392804,0.0025247564,0.021440573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011896702,0.000062791645,0.047216408,0.00015644445,0.000015892454,0.00026084064,0.0037202253,0.0013925284,0.00016711176,0.9184302,0.028529925,0.000035769004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023770842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001885917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008385472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014901466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02805221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573431212","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4562","title":"Bringing the Clinic into the 21st Century","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Ideology; Legal profession; Curriculum; Legal research; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal service; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0667829213781849,"score_gpt":0.42395261766041903,"score_spread":0.35716969628223416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573431212","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012100643,0.038421065,0.004540282,0.68751955,0.014790436,0.00006943067,0.00011022631,0.00031944475,0.24212892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32291916,0.07075024,0.011112075,0.29220027,0.016988618,0.0002608983,0.00019928745,0.00044281094,0.28512663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394387,0.0024598665,0.0001316651,0.00073750434,0.0012876112,0.0014395285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98864335,0.0012860264,0.00041500994,0.00042467864,0.0008467535,0.008384262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004474971,0.00048750988,0.00042990543,0.0015433677,0.015888123,0.014251188,0.0022894049,0.010928171,0.057978738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068971985,0.00042870938,0.00039191789,0.0011263749,0.019446833,0.014102344,0.016168734,0.012521486,0.0064285626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000351232,0.00022990181,0.0016833985,0.00025710397,0.0000067811357,0.0008321657,0.016510196,0.00009767514,0.0003434773,0.41085282,0.424037,0.14511435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008850152,0.000034103217,0.0004888123,0.00032158365,0.0000015116774,0.00048576138,0.0073534474,0.00003356838,0.000041940115,0.022386998,0.96883196,0.0000115385155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017763592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06263794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98937833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010621685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032080177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19395816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578760388","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4308","title":"ADVANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE THROUGH GENERIC SOLUTIONS: THE RISK OF PERPETUATING EXCLUSION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Equity (law); Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.10132671825391523,"score_gpt":0.315957939548271,"score_spread":0.21463122129435577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578760388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4056821,0.0083726,0.07836462,0.12108455,0.00063395465,0.0004163091,0.0003347346,0.0003431121,0.38476804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722844,0.0020135306,0.010718663,0.007435818,0.00019619861,0.0001842829,0.000091908754,0.00006259831,0.007012574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98124987,0.009691601,0.0010535362,0.0012218623,0.0045194365,0.002263688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97098505,0.012103958,0.005835376,0.0057642465,0.003110969,0.002200326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01479125,0.0005943329,0.001002108,0.0022183424,0.004311258,0.009670983,0.0022888398,0.0067735226,0.0077827526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055813428,0.0003980148,0.0012907579,0.0018247718,0.015829375,0.013613771,0.018707892,0.0057627647,0.00080331054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009185391,0.00025227535,0.009023387,0.00031241454,0.00005518385,0.0007562102,0.0062310644,0.0014848687,0.00052107364,0.89387155,0.0059417184,0.08145844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006382426,0.00027797968,0.005761807,0.00094490557,0.00006866746,0.0011442931,0.0052332226,0.003530472,0.0008565341,0.91394943,0.06810206,0.00006675165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025980745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002808168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01479125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004180671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00449911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07822454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588872417","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4548","title":"Levinasian Ethics and Animal Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Faith; Perspective (graphical); Constructive; Animal rights; Philosophy; Normative ethics; Ethical theory; Good faith; Human rights; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.1598950080186301,"score_gpt":0.3300452242628069,"score_spread":0.1701502162441768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588872417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030490102,0.030665856,0.028872445,0.15397799,0.000894655,0.000029115123,0.00007069368,0.00007294831,0.7549262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9018523,0.007885886,0.008176972,0.013054295,0.00077653705,0.00009248005,0.00004053693,0.00007745234,0.068043634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957664,0.0029145326,0.00010158747,0.00037209791,0.0004937994,0.00035150774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743325,0.0015691555,0.0002482136,0.0002521469,0.00032604887,0.00017117144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036124624,0.0003660856,0.00033608513,0.0009029614,0.0030967821,0.0042092316,0.00063343416,0.004441528,0.0042929626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052147056,0.00015578022,0.00029986582,0.00081240566,0.03002579,0.006100068,0.0027253558,0.0035121394,0.0007665915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021349717,0.0000017188781,0.000030106767,0.0000082407705,8.1153024e-7,0.000013988908,0.0008482675,0.000042080643,0.000025438198,0.9968154,0.00084802526,0.0013638492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022720503,0.00000398739,0.000056638815,0.000042988926,0.0000011247807,0.00003232089,0.00042170877,0.00006699734,0.000036489273,0.9276396,0.07169326,0.000002573991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003483166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029052787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00499439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00499439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027574794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588943375","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4483","title":"Access to Justice for Ethno-Racial Psychiatric Consumer/Survivors in Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Ethnic group; Racism; Mental health; Affect (linguistics); Economic Justice; Psychology; Language barrier; Psychiatry; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.22256611580942937,"score_gpt":0.4722170665607697,"score_spread":0.24965095075134036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588943375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965212,0.00040333037,0.00010523399,0.007540599,0.000019715844,0.00009333783,0.0001256568,0.0000060994416,0.026494076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878072,0.0007730056,0.00018283165,0.0010237462,0.000008343095,0.000050574654,0.00006214266,0.0000056712515,0.010086524],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989347,0.00020598428,0.000046536225,0.000049191298,0.00027558775,0.00048797668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964826,0.0009087112,0.0005191837,0.00012507632,0.0007829663,0.0011814054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000992659,0.00009657128,0.0001730547,0.0004984019,0.014352078,0.0016083637,0.0006425489,0.0006663371,0.005617426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004623679,0.00017039492,0.00012500522,0.0013767213,0.0028880772,0.0008619505,0.0025197638,0.0008193034,0.00016257868],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012295865,0.000118182674,0.15680245,0.0002673236,0.000012409645,0.0049991542,0.7396594,0.00016506745,0.0015913709,0.014214586,0.019087637,0.06295936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140576285,0.0000669397,0.16822241,0.00024512582,0.000012841174,0.00055516267,0.7603181,0.00016749799,0.00024246902,0.0010876629,0.06903575,0.0000319358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9564411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043558896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03763232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06857697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27304286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591884389","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4321","title":"ASSUMING REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR TRANSNATIONAL TORTS: AN INTERSTATE AFFAIR? A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CANADIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW TORT RULES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Private law; Public authority; Public law; Law and economics; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.05363717620028837,"score_gpt":0.3399906221544078,"score_spread":0.28635344595411943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591884389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023285612,0.010441355,0.009673036,0.048241973,0.0004553382,0.000050934777,0.00022001212,0.000067644105,0.90756404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84987986,0.010995927,0.0033259129,0.01402565,0.00056524423,0.00009264988,0.00019765345,0.00010946369,0.12080759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99262846,0.00079565315,0.00015143858,0.00089830393,0.0028031333,0.0027229623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647164,0.0013002488,0.00022864625,0.00028539763,0.0013653613,0.00034869343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038089552,0.0004431722,0.0003828576,0.0030142502,0.019487804,0.016896797,0.0023548712,0.006102318,0.004050202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067919386,0.0006055278,0.0004982459,0.0030688972,0.039799727,0.0067720115,0.0032912586,0.010162086,0.00042058603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001023753,0.0000020774748,0.000067973626,0.000005236821,7.697103e-7,0.000031325693,0.00253452,0.000066175475,0.000028652274,0.99354726,0.0020282117,0.0016866751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011797486,0.000017691775,0.0040062903,0.00031897522,0.000028383949,0.0001961674,0.0074866125,0.0010706353,0.0005144331,0.3691045,0.6171523,0.00009224754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93843496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94292367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07759509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06336641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5629944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600492370","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4320","title":"TRANSNATIONAL JUDICIAL AND NON-JUDICIAL REMEDIES FOR CORPORATE HUMAN RIGHTS HARMS: CHALLENGES OF AND FOR LAW","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Citizenship; International human rights law; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Accountability; Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Corporate social responsibility; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.08674591700188247,"score_gpt":0.2894710702355295,"score_spread":0.202725153233647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600492370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025775626,0.034779325,0.012495172,0.27836996,0.0016219334,0.00012439868,0.000072900846,0.00009114613,0.6466695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8028795,0.026920043,0.007748021,0.04760403,0.0013587408,0.00021482128,0.00010018492,0.00009192504,0.113082714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122673,0.0034565118,0.00039044334,0.0010714162,0.0017682712,0.0020866296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910131,0.0049593174,0.00068352633,0.0013679486,0.0010964284,0.000879595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01193905,0.00038381136,0.00067455944,0.001552969,0.0077486704,0.017197328,0.0020936322,0.0129923755,0.010780635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012689581,0.00036660687,0.00068596547,0.0013122188,0.035544366,0.02035792,0.008296116,0.010100198,0.0007886464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021797296,0.000008855419,0.00013320074,0.000029957324,0.0000018283097,0.000055463777,0.0013759051,0.00008893008,0.000038905288,0.9846613,0.0048806267,0.008722807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010837189,0.00003127148,0.0015770318,0.001059714,0.000010691021,0.0002898603,0.011663538,0.0005215389,0.0002869527,0.5412171,0.4432882,0.000043215674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042914778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08619528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042914778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010947954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024392296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08532995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1633656768","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4310","title":"UN GRAIN DE SABLE DANS L’ENGRENAGE DU SYSTÈME JURIDIQUE. LES JUSTICIABLES NON REPRÉSENTÉS: PROBLÈMES OU SYMPTÔMES?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06830685687199746,"score_gpt":0.37099027590922573,"score_spread":0.3026834190372283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1633656768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060843423,0.06966599,0.008574257,0.6568189,0.0037661644,0.00004848901,0.00014442773,0.00013063248,0.20000775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91867995,0.021548176,0.0037877406,0.018806458,0.0017389684,0.00007111834,0.0000713924,0.00013914911,0.035157125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215263,0.0041409684,0.00028633632,0.00052903115,0.0019863516,0.00090460863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926157,0.0040675425,0.0009986173,0.00057396456,0.0010573464,0.00068684935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007411663,0.00039957807,0.00073266745,0.0023407615,0.013609405,0.019422282,0.0013300375,0.0070676226,0.0061705885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014417101,0.00054685294,0.00036062632,0.0031401047,0.054355502,0.019817162,0.0069821733,0.010458999,0.00094490126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002820866,0.00002428869,0.0021266462,0.00021707524,0.0000120360155,0.0004908795,0.09269234,0.00018791207,0.00018376841,0.84007925,0.03412572,0.029831816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022303313,0.000044343928,0.0061782836,0.0011019597,0.000011903792,0.0014259439,0.11232943,0.00074809365,0.0003052043,0.2901523,0.58758724,0.00009289219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07720435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06710294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07720435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012225655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0130340895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15350991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1732764338","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4479","title":"Sweating it Out: Facilitating Corrections and Parole in Canada Through Aboriginal Spiritual Healing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Restorative justice; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Value (mathematics); Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07434050631534936,"score_gpt":0.36261489061458013,"score_spread":0.2882743842992308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1732764338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144955,0.0024859,0.0015775255,0.03661586,0.00043097197,0.00070808764,0.0002691309,0.0001652041,0.043251757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96475893,0.0032934293,0.006819853,0.0045136297,0.000041620617,0.00020947319,0.00018287628,0.00006298674,0.020117179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808264,0.00051002036,0.000035468936,0.00011448246,0.00031028164,0.0009471692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995089,0.00035403934,0.00017999734,0.00011196666,0.00079562585,0.0034695116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020359491,0.00038484033,0.00030699756,0.0010858948,0.024501046,0.003268695,0.0030868675,0.0010769345,0.008407776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004042237,0.00033370196,0.0004834275,0.0012164199,0.0045448537,0.0012646177,0.0066674883,0.0025274819,0.00050559774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005818363,0.0016548038,0.07278383,0.0012965208,0.000094831645,0.0074663,0.44587702,0.0010295802,0.0054255356,0.0142209055,0.07631408,0.3732548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012372399,0.0005897522,0.12352805,0.0011975843,0.00013145705,0.0009147005,0.6150995,0.0011958717,0.0014956604,0.0028343238,0.25267613,0.0002132429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9725903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99673694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05380614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05380614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25440758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39039272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173368851","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4532","title":"Feminist Debates on Civilian Women and International Humanitarian Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Mainstream; Political science; Law; Armed conflict; Inequality; Action (physics); Enforcement; Criminology; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.052135575158152606,"score_gpt":0.34538568313399376,"score_spread":0.29325010797584117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173368851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03252984,0.07963798,0.0024161015,0.40592727,0.0019863644,0.000018359777,0.00007901342,0.000021282995,0.47738373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83182746,0.041674823,0.0010737096,0.0635777,0.0038440404,0.00006441811,0.00004481461,0.000052053925,0.057841007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952394,0.0031044597,0.00009348301,0.00033569854,0.00061866065,0.00060826266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99517184,0.0039024407,0.00037575944,0.00012853557,0.00020915119,0.0002123211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075415326,0.0004033108,0.0003618547,0.0011400052,0.008232644,0.008847568,0.0009954348,0.004777988,0.0062855934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006255886,0.00023095595,0.00023422916,0.0017067669,0.043628246,0.0066664363,0.0039769495,0.0054375213,0.00044187738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005864791,0.000006686238,0.00027440867,0.00005139055,0.0000018687632,0.0000925999,0.033212014,0.00005902777,0.00006597463,0.945934,0.012606469,0.0076897014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000825573,0.000021383594,0.0012614818,0.0008443155,0.000004318198,0.00016029073,0.045766383,0.00007772693,0.00020763604,0.17531358,0.7763198,0.000014762357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008240099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013057641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008847568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00832578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035237567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060408056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1734215792","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4508","title":"Comparative Administrative Law: Outlining a Field of Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Legitimacy; Political science; Accountability; Public law; State (computer science); Field (mathematics); Comparative law; Politics; Law; Public administration; Independence (probability theory); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08280204098801151,"score_gpt":0.3681444384888115,"score_spread":0.2853423975008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1734215792","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011232795,0.44073462,0.04007754,0.2954874,0.005266201,0.00031132222,0.00019178525,0.000089304645,0.20660904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48034167,0.39472288,0.046088416,0.038204454,0.017597668,0.0019197041,0.0003873167,0.00021329414,0.020524625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812841,0.015286528,0.00048450517,0.0010618473,0.0011836182,0.0006994942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593195,0.03539208,0.001127924,0.0015112208,0.0015964323,0.0010528367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022339908,0.0010556037,0.0018577512,0.011421456,0.010825181,0.0240171,0.0033923246,0.013461744,0.0045432877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01845887,0.0007835201,0.00080025214,0.019000202,0.08580781,0.03226366,0.009199017,0.012666989,0.00091182673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004086442,0.000025086527,0.00011193073,0.00014587649,0.0000017265651,0.000050124872,0.0028722018,0.0000685148,0.000033288492,0.9884177,0.0029257648,0.0053436505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010559901,0.000041942083,0.00067190424,0.0021294677,0.0000037861985,0.00027093187,0.021153448,0.00048206703,0.000057031873,0.778284,0.19687477,0.000020176627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007172942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048411875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0240171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014569238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011696646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11814612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814050479","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4359","title":"STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECISION IN LENAHAN (GONZALES) AND ITS APPLICATION IN CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Human rights; Political science; Commission; Law; Domestic violence; International human rights law; Context (archaeology); State responsibility; Declaration; State (computer science); Economic Justice; International law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.051554643403361425,"score_gpt":0.3801888644527322,"score_spread":0.3286342210493708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814050479","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029837258,0.01787529,0.0034305982,0.6156673,0.0033704357,0.0002369813,0.0003531235,0.000081848615,0.32914728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62791455,0.011694353,0.004709502,0.22229064,0.0008367814,0.00022618816,0.00015843079,0.000111708454,0.13205785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753643,0.0037366056,0.0008105989,0.0025649166,0.0086129615,0.008910549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98685026,0.0051932177,0.0005184938,0.00051616365,0.0042342944,0.0026876286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013289504,0.00082185486,0.0009483959,0.0018498132,0.03936097,0.019077392,0.004409525,0.024339767,0.005301201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031718068,0.0010250586,0.0011464221,0.0029682259,0.03303192,0.005020802,0.008599336,0.024196133,0.00040834976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002549669,0.000027580385,0.0016219657,0.000069310765,0.000021032134,0.0005552137,0.01571875,0.0003584775,0.00015749344,0.8885094,0.08368596,0.009249331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009270054,0.000039244354,0.010527911,0.0013396542,0.000120623976,0.0003017485,0.038192708,0.0011522145,0.0008772179,0.101066425,0.8458322,0.00045732883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15575896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15575896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30926606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97919995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832272874","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4369","title":"STRATEGIES OF LEGAL RUPTURE: THE POLITICS OF JUDGMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04672239609787617,"score_gpt":0.3550110150727949,"score_spread":0.30828861897491877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1832272874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048691962,0.008050827,0.059002716,0.2106007,0.0028462692,0.00013102955,0.00004872298,0.00018996863,0.67043775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691306,0.0010822753,0.0032397846,0.009581928,0.0008197573,0.000086845444,0.00002007521,0.00012132015,0.01591737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95680195,0.022659581,0.0013310324,0.0042480505,0.010027565,0.004931823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693011,0.020876398,0.0018576921,0.0018824656,0.0042986064,0.0017837381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03466293,0.0007167817,0.0008587799,0.0029966799,0.025953276,0.033393867,0.0037314352,0.013342243,0.004264375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06529995,0.00063419854,0.0008970714,0.0023365805,0.112138756,0.026939077,0.016008005,0.019805444,0.0009969168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037759692,0.0000044649573,0.000102132624,0.00001050431,0.0000029220032,0.0001157545,0.013440543,0.00008811522,0.00004872435,0.9816157,0.0022112296,0.0023561537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010927601,0.00001633097,0.00014616478,0.00014535562,0.0000072503003,0.00011993892,0.021141656,0.00044909524,0.00017769137,0.8814761,0.09627105,0.000038581245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010743531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069661606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03466293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01372252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014402439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1833173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863832171","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4407","title":"Introduction: Re-Igniting Critical Race In Canadian Legal Spaces: Introduction To The Special Symposium Issue Of Contemporary Accounts Of Racialization In Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Race (biology); Praxis; Scholarship; Critical race theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0251121704079767,"score_gpt":0.3101698702645446,"score_spread":0.2850576998565679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863832171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016033967,0.12361209,0.0020430938,0.5586945,0.17307496,0.00020554638,0.0022969535,0.00029058688,0.13817883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05314132,0.18552154,0.005298822,0.26922733,0.12603639,0.00055331114,0.0027298196,0.0009811234,0.3565103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979869,0.00018438544,0.000060939532,0.00022511349,0.0010710169,0.00047171168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403715,0.0010205795,0.0001383502,0.00011616771,0.0036766885,0.0010110075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022598074,0.0014259428,0.0007936474,0.0036363427,0.016257742,0.00954356,0.0025863722,0.0062206704,0.031911522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069775335,0.00060661056,0.0008300206,0.0056637875,0.0062588244,0.0047538932,0.0035067794,0.010057808,0.004762409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004683942,0.000005646336,0.000105667925,0.00008060317,0.0000014831795,0.000016047068,0.0011186107,0.00003247439,0.000051869978,0.006609195,0.98503125,0.0069425297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002838797,0.000003271785,0.0009840394,0.0002906034,0.0000036936372,0.000026852147,0.0017337183,0.00003156629,0.000030808667,0.0018424569,0.9950294,0.000020762973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8664705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9487901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043344993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053506345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3144914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873752839","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4502","title":"Politics and Policy Change in American Administrative Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Law; Political science; Arbitrariness; Abandonment (legal); Law and economics; Administrative law; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07245255672048595,"score_gpt":0.4187299525912302,"score_spread":0.34627739587074424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1873752839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043525077,0.017521108,0.0036612542,0.23221849,0.0013042812,0.00003776536,0.000052903448,0.000060470204,0.7016187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90708864,0.0070356796,0.0013343481,0.030668786,0.0012350247,0.00008440702,0.00003846169,0.00003626356,0.052478332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931965,0.0029012044,0.00015178992,0.0006180087,0.0016176448,0.0015148977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970294,0.0017618267,0.0003005526,0.00019699862,0.0003496229,0.00036144233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051119467,0.00024336367,0.00026227807,0.0017656822,0.015076954,0.014375132,0.001035143,0.006577737,0.0050538112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007913871,0.00036761162,0.00040422016,0.003272099,0.029175712,0.0063242754,0.0038560778,0.00803927,0.00050962623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019016799,0.000012907974,0.00016694023,0.0000073076467,0.0000013988729,0.000018929139,0.0010610725,0.00016376503,0.000022706565,0.9907584,0.004763985,0.003020726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012619121,0.000011707175,0.002138464,0.00009977345,0.0000068552854,0.000027486936,0.0027031596,0.00064183265,0.00011928162,0.6890541,0.3051608,0.000023761366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062659025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074387185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062659025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028632225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022566266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20774227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1874830625","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4410","title":"RACIALIZED IN JUSTICE: THE LEGAL AND EXTRA-LEGAL STRUGGLES OF MIGRANT AGRICULTURAL WORKERS IN CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Capitalism; Political science; Supreme court; Racism; Labour law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Freedom of association; Law; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.017230350071382093,"score_gpt":0.28464117954011126,"score_spread":0.2674108294687292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1874830625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.669042,0.015839227,0.0006351689,0.10277035,0.0004829452,0.000098276876,0.00031622068,0.00004204458,0.21077375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516639,0.005012449,0.00032114025,0.008121498,0.000050699666,0.00002836036,0.00006374397,0.00002915068,0.034709077],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959623,0.00043868204,0.00005140305,0.00025844306,0.0008948704,0.0023943062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704593,0.00063680793,0.00020397619,0.00007505224,0.0007434553,0.0012947506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020487197,0.00028887208,0.00045357316,0.0016378929,0.066663764,0.009132828,0.0022495717,0.0028696558,0.005066131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047489284,0.0002921283,0.0002919977,0.0033512025,0.018144635,0.0018118058,0.0057326625,0.0041511687,0.0002427734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070879854,0.00010328342,0.033037547,0.0001824768,0.000028590513,0.002529549,0.51614076,0.00060830323,0.0010698534,0.28589562,0.07855643,0.08177663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018087936,0.00003542365,0.06807548,0.00069537706,0.000042066942,0.0004547053,0.52008903,0.000647267,0.0003911511,0.018580848,0.39083537,0.0001352406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99782664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17205648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17205648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29267225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9602971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883554158","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4421","title":"LOOKING FOR QUALITY: THE EMPIRICAL DEBATE IN ACCESS TO JUSTICE RESEARCH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; CONTEST; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5530687811844535,"score_gpt":0.6007818828052836,"score_spread":0.04771310162083009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883554158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011800528,0.21015905,0.009671339,0.72868615,0.0037597143,0.00004731261,0.00026927335,0.000021797106,0.035584822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6242046,0.17211986,0.00845731,0.16742587,0.021974562,0.00034474325,0.00045194328,0.0003052314,0.0047159186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8601644,0.09724553,0.005321533,0.009718462,0.024248492,0.003301673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36707512,0.5775812,0.017419124,0.013647473,0.019060178,0.005216861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.122140616,0.00073675916,0.0028099914,0.011618535,0.008841603,0.02597394,0.0056462274,0.010266655,0.011621656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34917942,0.00079255685,0.0014712709,0.022860063,0.09583956,0.05892793,0.013283178,0.01950529,0.001142054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054469,0.00006802972,0.0050870897,0.0014338905,0.00009854046,0.00006902661,0.010006424,0.00016293107,0.000033595872,0.92855537,0.016124463,0.03830619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003644547,0.000060179373,0.005367616,0.010073854,0.00007074558,0.000118419375,0.017174127,0.00036645963,0.00008244347,0.91039824,0.056194026,0.000057409703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016487425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011719329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87785935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016134553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014649441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.645949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W191593598","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4478","title":"Unity in Diversity: European Citizenship through the Lens of Popular Culture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; CONTEST; European union; Identity (music); Skepticism; Political science; Politics; Diversity (politics); European integration; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Political economy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Literature","score_opus":0.1528635642979528,"score_gpt":0.33139674642226635,"score_spread":0.17853318212431354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W191593598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36512217,0.012523796,0.008854848,0.023962596,0.00043633537,0.000033275577,0.00007729841,0.000031721967,0.58895797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481577,0.000959197,0.00055309234,0.00057182636,0.000114263996,0.000018147924,0.000018414563,0.000019891037,0.0029292663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203813,0.0062605226,0.00012786752,0.00045235024,0.0004381209,0.0006829751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956363,0.0028956237,0.00032080975,0.00048151944,0.00018277184,0.0004829937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006954029,0.00044327904,0.0006133389,0.004106662,0.010840643,0.025122304,0.0013809103,0.0035799963,0.0033899543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070625916,0.00022890879,0.00043340915,0.0048196684,0.04182193,0.022391252,0.012918703,0.004371631,0.00019709216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019240357,0.000021132366,0.0011552178,0.000035473786,0.00001075302,0.00021040776,0.26704034,0.000101954516,0.00006865443,0.7199784,0.001227011,0.0101313405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017745338,0.000033508986,0.0037215187,0.00040315822,0.00001980119,0.00040990792,0.38457763,0.00042102076,0.00018465656,0.4400316,0.1701526,0.000026891914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005434835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005385587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025122304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006361059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022777035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04615289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945724790","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4412","title":"‘ISLANDS OF EMPOWERMENT’: ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW AND THE QUESTION OF RACIAL EMANCIPATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Emancipation; Sociology; Politics; Privilege (computing); Political science; Power (physics); Ethnology; Status quo; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022123023957614105,"score_gpt":0.34684255039198875,"score_spread":0.32471952643437463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945724790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021125708,0.018987175,0.007293217,0.47281742,0.0018546691,0.000018668692,0.000023621775,0.00004854432,0.47783107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9117207,0.005031265,0.0019522147,0.038586054,0.0018503492,0.00007386324,0.000017136505,0.00008497448,0.04068339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994911,0.0031942646,0.00007009719,0.00043100104,0.00070462836,0.0006890396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955974,0.003208624,0.00021385524,0.00035117453,0.00030246557,0.00032657516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006325459,0.00037810206,0.00041727858,0.0011192648,0.010123194,0.009354626,0.001589169,0.006297629,0.004251255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011231992,0.00026740378,0.0002763091,0.0010008843,0.07014675,0.014981167,0.007852943,0.009587522,0.0005145739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036801266,0.0000037187692,0.000056730612,0.0000071510594,8.024536e-7,0.000031800206,0.0043490343,0.000018756129,0.00002035743,0.9869984,0.0057854354,0.002724189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008676855,0.000007765417,0.0002245035,0.0001025592,0.0000020000189,0.00006253608,0.005739916,0.00010962075,0.00011577629,0.810935,0.18268357,0.000008015494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006994089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007859186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010123194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004148367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047189584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03345257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958945035","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4495","title":"Converging Feminist and Queer Legal Theories: Family Feuds and Family Ties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Family ties; Sociology; Gender studies; Queer theory; Family law; Criminology; Political science; Law; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.01907978739100149,"score_gpt":0.3096303091375563,"score_spread":0.2905505217465548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958945035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06951212,0.06631867,0.007560908,0.16806602,0.0006935014,0.000044266868,0.00011712812,0.000032829084,0.6876546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92611784,0.025415223,0.0016220687,0.0065194736,0.0004627657,0.000092940376,0.00006544724,0.000032301214,0.03967192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961474,0.0023807492,0.000070327274,0.00030095014,0.0005863885,0.0005142401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503314,0.00354839,0.00035105884,0.00017782589,0.0003777474,0.0005116954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005542424,0.00045254483,0.00051736686,0.004547195,0.01479323,0.010557311,0.0020241626,0.0041758423,0.008353187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007122576,0.00025259051,0.00027376995,0.0028401131,0.059570283,0.012692591,0.0056364886,0.004219028,0.00039270084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037834209,0.000009426275,0.00039476488,0.000020062818,0.0000013483798,0.00011038445,0.05206966,0.000051709758,0.0000088182705,0.93623316,0.0026691037,0.008427804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007144985,0.000013837885,0.0020732651,0.0008857496,0.0000072971025,0.00021699688,0.14996986,0.0003350477,0.00007301367,0.6163656,0.2300345,0.000017702163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07955259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090101294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07955259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025836399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079302965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18745708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203119075","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4364","title":"OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF SELF-HELP LEGAL RESOURCES TO CITIZENS IN NEED","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Process (computing); Service provider; Public relations; Legal research; Business; Legal service; Knowledge management; Point (geometry); Service (business); Internet privacy; Political science; Marketing; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18574860047580985,"score_gpt":0.3929875146692892,"score_spread":0.20723891419347937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203119075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6050663,0.01059054,0.0091938395,0.091609724,0.00023183024,0.00027755473,0.00009367195,0.00009764598,0.28283882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870026,0.003328539,0.004381278,0.0008769841,0.000049333812,0.00016614364,0.000024448389,0.000020518808,0.0041500833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773942,0.016243398,0.000567925,0.00074753386,0.0024041838,0.0026427733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689288,0.023923561,0.0015272947,0.0015226454,0.0019479825,0.0021496478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023693133,0.00031044145,0.00049644866,0.0023754823,0.008289709,0.013522655,0.0025328612,0.0041458244,0.0063943164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033055376,0.00053110096,0.0004728711,0.002321471,0.016151046,0.016364196,0.015349499,0.0026470101,0.00059388106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018138924,0.0003730008,0.022224031,0.0011778558,0.000027320388,0.0025185265,0.2403525,0.0008314071,0.00065015064,0.48684454,0.008360485,0.23645873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054875254,0.00037851217,0.0112420535,0.0040087453,0.00006001545,0.0037923788,0.63472986,0.0018546497,0.0007298018,0.14909542,0.19396958,0.00008417998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006123643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014286769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023693133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005967135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010355462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12530273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101070058","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4420","title":"MARGINALIZING TRANS MEDICAL EXPENSES: LINE-DRAWING EXERCISES IN TAX","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Business; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04237428838415885,"score_gpt":0.28195690279442526,"score_spread":0.2395826144102664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101070058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22294243,0.001114909,0.050551817,0.013324132,0.00029997123,0.0004370512,0.00007589171,0.0001733936,0.7110803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533917,0.000586868,0.013168979,0.0026388126,0.00008212464,0.00013146116,0.00004058871,0.00006719875,0.029892271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554414,0.0017324643,0.000092716,0.0003687889,0.0012731872,0.0009888159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469584,0.0032818448,0.00027309623,0.00048146554,0.00084798166,0.00041988585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056303455,0.00055848015,0.0004748355,0.001300797,0.011555155,0.0068322914,0.002544898,0.0028663096,0.015714075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018702723,0.0002912873,0.000504523,0.0016194144,0.0077888197,0.0052900286,0.0046616257,0.004364501,0.0007731447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007453157,0.00016373796,0.0018397487,0.000045464094,0.000012821891,0.0004054235,0.012050235,0.0019906985,0.0004427986,0.90669256,0.009605663,0.06667626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000198857,0.00027131932,0.0062100696,0.0005637853,0.00016005116,0.00053248426,0.07613157,0.026778094,0.0028929734,0.5649709,0.32116795,0.00012189609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10024974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18665244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10024974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010037953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011981724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19933242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102478617","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4503","title":"The Elusive Search for Accountability: Evaluating Adjudicative Tribunals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Accountability; Statute; Political science; Statutory law; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Law; Empirical research; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21485697220580602,"score_gpt":0.5664119353968783,"score_spread":0.35155496319107227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102478617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4280658,0.02729545,0.14644702,0.112709,0.0024964912,0.007521401,0.0006492581,0.00024940187,0.2745661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546567,0.0016589855,0.034299865,0.0038950655,0.00029166834,0.002420804,0.00012427106,0.00006565858,0.002587038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.33811158,0.53558576,0.023920665,0.007550099,0.086819,0.008012877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.114099465,0.7239016,0.041430984,0.022282368,0.093780614,0.004504973],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.45439,0.0010726813,0.0021832369,0.011076485,0.01402698,0.026111923,0.0060703023,0.0075729075,0.0040228604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7769381,0.0007740632,0.0017413078,0.014838345,0.04218647,0.030583177,0.014446515,0.009188965,0.00087545894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000704236,0.0008207325,0.056779042,0.0026279977,0.0005233906,0.0003563891,0.076521374,0.00474237,0.00035486778,0.6247304,0.013714708,0.21812458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059239595,0.0032494988,0.073305264,0.013917901,0.00089509826,0.00055948185,0.15448828,0.030692656,0.0038041568,0.61266404,0.105160974,0.00067028997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039316587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046972003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043152865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052133154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6728343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145310377","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4484","title":"It’s Not Working: Barriers to the Inclusion of Workers with Mental Health Issues","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Mental health; Harassment; Workforce; Work (physics); Isolation (microbiology); Psychology; Criminology; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.12094392633594984,"score_gpt":0.39363271885302253,"score_spread":0.2726887925170727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145310377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6059273,0.0058059855,0.001729691,0.28789413,0.0011167895,0.0000787882,0.00003537579,0.000038306425,0.097373724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97836876,0.0014640498,0.00051082793,0.013917329,0.000110634275,0.000036053487,0.000012970433,0.000023173003,0.0055561326],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753886,0.011766216,0.00081462954,0.0006588385,0.0051061003,0.0062655793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729644,0.013434976,0.0031780605,0.0010368243,0.0033096876,0.006076085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014353846,0.00021653352,0.0004917256,0.00091042026,0.024150316,0.008686861,0.0020939768,0.0037128206,0.00454702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04230948,0.00041660192,0.00038782755,0.0009968551,0.016291784,0.006411423,0.012820767,0.0073302174,0.00056724815],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030383586,0.00011354238,0.022590518,0.00018967825,0.000013135764,0.0014912365,0.8460994,0.0000423948,0.000455251,0.03347741,0.02149677,0.074000336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081170065,0.000051357543,0.011571047,0.00073380116,0.000009780013,0.0007547339,0.91312337,0.00007730605,0.0001427068,0.007388163,0.066107504,0.000032164735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06851095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09430693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06851095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075940625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025268555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13622433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155701897","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4358","title":"THINKING PAST RIGHTS: TOWARDS FEMINIST THEORIES OF REPARATIONS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Blueprint; Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Human rights; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Law","score_opus":0.05204544252650565,"score_gpt":0.2918164277951084,"score_spread":0.23977098526860277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155701897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019855544,0.021598548,0.0675261,0.22356944,0.0010497468,0.0001137543,0.00017055515,0.00008009311,0.66603625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547157,0.017531468,0.027211808,0.019257842,0.0019925993,0.0005909327,0.00015844406,0.00020550347,0.07833585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312496,0.0053451713,0.00008412014,0.00038670216,0.00050735,0.00055170414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99223846,0.006140971,0.000506952,0.00034745922,0.00038013625,0.0003859607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102686025,0.00074503117,0.00050523644,0.003098664,0.0067448914,0.010560006,0.0024605703,0.004811958,0.0060199285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005984487,0.00040471888,0.0005092046,0.0022992732,0.07162157,0.021650625,0.004597356,0.008109318,0.0008286293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017696119,0.0000060386824,0.000053105377,0.0000138984105,4.6953545e-7,0.000026701404,0.0139842015,0.000062304636,0.000014791325,0.9824095,0.0016304639,0.0017967116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004470194,0.000007255523,0.00015632769,0.00020047773,0.0000015793574,0.000056078345,0.01915779,0.00027360252,0.00009588674,0.83725613,0.14278394,0.000006359356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058704955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062752967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010560006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008442984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034627474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061258435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165304286","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4418","title":"SHIFTING JUDICIAL CONCEPTIONS OF 'RECONCILIATION': GEOGRAPHIC COMMITMENTS UNDERPINNING ABORIGINAL RIGHTS DECISIONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Underpinning; Power (physics); Identity (music); Sociology; Colonialism; Law; Political science; Politics; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04326715924850702,"score_gpt":0.3733716521872018,"score_spread":0.3301044929386948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165304286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32479617,0.007975222,0.034011945,0.09483492,0.0005803951,0.00018334175,0.000111106565,0.000097249846,0.5374096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99136823,0.0005850394,0.001601189,0.0013834259,0.00007488036,0.00003586069,0.000014050776,0.000026207283,0.004910947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768689,0.014201488,0.00069349393,0.0016478798,0.0037683654,0.00281985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98563033,0.009832859,0.0009884245,0.001052905,0.001945938,0.00054959935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016646897,0.0003228847,0.00048416923,0.001947362,0.021732498,0.017084349,0.0029493372,0.0052305586,0.0031551758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031454235,0.00046682963,0.00035676075,0.002246095,0.065387115,0.008512924,0.008947958,0.009081925,0.00021866364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007420748,0.000005969977,0.00032770322,0.000032407243,0.0000031887491,0.00026005247,0.23834531,0.00018610204,0.00023549906,0.75348824,0.0014538699,0.0056542987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023639133,0.000026480431,0.003849571,0.00056576746,0.000027672872,0.00035940667,0.4423918,0.0008904932,0.0009803388,0.35899982,0.19179323,0.00009170286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24271874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26443034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75728124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026013896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028485786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48261195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192283895","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4491","title":"HLA Hart, Lon Fuller and the Ghosts of Legal Interpretation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Human leukocyte antigen; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Linguistics; Immunology","score_opus":0.014425546957771136,"score_gpt":0.3172044303791481,"score_spread":0.30277888342137693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192283895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0572639,0.046550892,0.0039254967,0.32574388,0.0038692676,0.000038022226,0.000093057366,0.00007658195,0.56243885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541287,0.013902861,0.0013377413,0.02140998,0.0020065669,0.000040579518,0.00003400662,0.00009131053,0.10704833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976164,0.0012998681,0.00004675559,0.0001602188,0.00057762355,0.0002991315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967822,0.0022702517,0.00028627558,0.000115114795,0.0002567269,0.00028937234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022581588,0.00026950357,0.00028571673,0.0007360725,0.009876441,0.009485712,0.00061192905,0.0031527772,0.0047594807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052594403,0.00031869914,0.00012467452,0.00071875483,0.021646747,0.008212947,0.0022408725,0.0050057624,0.0005061274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024479206,0.000014009155,0.00022347432,0.000057175523,0.0000027864182,0.00025702882,0.04686184,0.00005366981,0.00009146073,0.8636065,0.07992755,0.008879943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016319787,0.0000234918,0.00080572604,0.00031653032,0.000006962153,0.00031944842,0.042241193,0.00011446714,0.0001811386,0.17987248,0.7760733,0.000028919088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029498467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051594205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029498467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008894344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050389264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06453323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195285776","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4711","title":"ARCHITECTURE, RITUALS, AND NORMS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; McGill University","keywords":"Adjudication; Economic Justice; Legitimacy; Dignity; Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Realisation; Civil law (Civil law); Value (mathematics); Public law; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.06755592402990689,"score_gpt":0.36041342655953085,"score_spread":0.29285750252962395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195285776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071963914,0.015900955,0.07344686,0.020370701,0.0005524354,0.00008493552,0.0000549533,0.00015973322,0.8174654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688757,0.0032650207,0.011029728,0.0009496588,0.00027694323,0.00009687517,0.000028141887,0.00006469866,0.015413237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99082184,0.006162669,0.000347493,0.00066937413,0.0014065563,0.0005921095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637324,0.0019946361,0.00048446737,0.00066837564,0.00024507183,0.00023416431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00547095,0.00036357224,0.00031174408,0.0016490858,0.0050817993,0.008823682,0.00093690207,0.002182513,0.0028843377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069852523,0.0002897009,0.00035017024,0.0015329869,0.08034598,0.007734473,0.0050263195,0.0034307258,0.0005525329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028291233,0.0000027256083,0.00010046556,0.0000122292695,0.0000010157306,0.000011650169,0.0032634423,0.00011688926,0.000037999736,0.99193186,0.00029315223,0.004225736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006728971,0.000020803884,0.0010190936,0.00013270351,0.0000035803344,0.00007975507,0.0036831624,0.00036243314,0.00017416172,0.91068053,0.08382202,0.000015026549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005176441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061988947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008823682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038921062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038842792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028933465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203974182","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4546","title":"Reflective Equilibrium: Epistemological or Political?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Work (physics); Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Law; Neoclassical economics; Physics","score_opus":0.18923729405500175,"score_gpt":0.43077700877945313,"score_spread":0.24153971472445138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203974182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011433533,0.023892736,0.12862568,0.56231,0.0063413437,0.00010096203,0.00011631147,0.00021165347,0.26696783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86243707,0.014738954,0.029512458,0.056183394,0.0067670345,0.0004580025,0.00013538399,0.0004523688,0.0293154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772275,0.013218519,0.0010559728,0.0025696678,0.0041129077,0.0018153256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786379,0.012763855,0.0017608517,0.002834515,0.0027279705,0.0012748702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027403457,0.0007796895,0.0016018219,0.0028692668,0.0061659375,0.019451581,0.00274518,0.009335384,0.008950441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047183033,0.00061757845,0.00090193684,0.0035820075,0.07617532,0.040628403,0.010357061,0.01233136,0.0023327933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004991045,0.000008490004,0.00006433402,0.000040360956,0.0000040041114,0.000011458276,0.0008847535,0.000035506022,0.000024995239,0.9937156,0.0014918004,0.0037136434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000666997,0.0000042951115,0.00005056915,0.000093626215,0.000003585245,0.000032308682,0.0014088772,0.00014508152,0.000082193685,0.9788673,0.019296257,0.000009117168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001933637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014942475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027403457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061011203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076034297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14492506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210147736","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4539","title":"Dishing up Israel: Rethinking the Potential of Legal Mixité","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Judgement; Dialogic; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legal history; Sociology; Israeli law; Common law; Religious law; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law; Geography","score_opus":0.05974086345521199,"score_gpt":0.32363465804989083,"score_spread":0.2638937945946788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210147736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22893718,0.0068654586,0.010951794,0.058937922,0.0006075496,0.00005472449,0.000039167084,0.000061308565,0.69354486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98535013,0.00084422226,0.0012612611,0.002727731,0.000105920895,0.000027941205,0.0000115463645,0.000039611547,0.009631621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956055,0.0027476428,0.00006985445,0.00029099223,0.00065883267,0.0006271044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445677,0.0040556397,0.00023653223,0.000378929,0.00042779857,0.00044424276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008211791,0.0003121161,0.0003710434,0.0018440727,0.011269458,0.016807225,0.0016560387,0.003804937,0.0058609555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094476715,0.00028510284,0.00023425954,0.0011821041,0.04192357,0.012848697,0.011635768,0.0061954204,0.00042850286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012367665,0.000012955739,0.0005366491,0.000019337642,0.000002386952,0.00016908794,0.040986,0.00005994057,0.00007645859,0.9449133,0.0018423938,0.011369146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026014959,0.000051005496,0.0014214298,0.0005933612,0.000012631574,0.00030606365,0.12889399,0.0010520432,0.0006062439,0.72120386,0.14579906,0.000034245662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070404853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014160771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016807225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009378537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003990722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06804639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210386310","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4680","title":"IMMIGRATION AND DISABILITY IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Legalization; Citizenship; Immigration law; Political science; Naturalization; Immigration reform; Discretion; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.037078437423837554,"score_gpt":0.3167013106575316,"score_spread":0.27962287323369406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210386310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33098823,0.03012539,0.00043852607,0.10285705,0.0021709173,0.00026582228,0.0131557165,0.00011469371,0.51988363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85726815,0.03319137,0.0011044178,0.021177702,0.00027281803,0.00014302079,0.004277885,0.00006882688,0.08249574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979013,0.00010082592,0.00009000973,0.00010851966,0.00067985884,0.0011194828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953654,0.00022433445,0.00022318959,0.000051011368,0.0020254923,0.002110562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009616077,0.00025684305,0.00040925192,0.0031941542,0.014915315,0.0051234835,0.0012118974,0.0011397636,0.01035237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004354794,0.00024392515,0.0007102384,0.0067908033,0.0021612605,0.0010363138,0.0034056376,0.0022211592,0.00050060946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001711392,0.00020522058,0.28925037,0.00052328705,0.00015553317,0.003450886,0.017477611,0.0014652425,0.0002099733,0.13344944,0.38984665,0.16379473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008289231,0.000043112,0.46348062,0.00204445,0.0001327881,0.00081816415,0.046905138,0.0010559591,0.00013922047,0.005395012,0.47970006,0.00020248191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99896896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99955815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0851651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0851651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25059828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61791897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219473791","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4493","title":"Human Rights Disclosure Litigation: Uncovering Invisible Medical Records","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Confidentiality; Neglect; Relevance (law); Jurisprudence; Internet privacy; Business; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Medical record; Personally identifiable information; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Computer security; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.04647661731335942,"score_gpt":0.3538727867256669,"score_spread":0.3073961694123075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219473791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5258953,0.026556477,0.043413747,0.13144022,0.0007177035,0.0001873825,0.00010096334,0.00009081491,0.2715974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97674835,0.0063426793,0.0044002086,0.006285181,0.0003300517,0.000044719727,0.000020964972,0.00002079597,0.0058069853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96898067,0.015714396,0.0012605616,0.0015356096,0.010220073,0.0022886943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90464115,0.08334336,0.007279904,0.0026075547,0.0013198286,0.0008080809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024658734,0.00018515124,0.00034255395,0.004723688,0.011297919,0.014672304,0.0018946247,0.007228044,0.0027446996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057923526,0.00048333555,0.00040108874,0.0026692017,0.030549861,0.02006076,0.014109627,0.005984212,0.00031989516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029905508,0.000053432967,0.0055761756,0.00016868528,0.000007570006,0.0025116482,0.11242179,0.00025066338,0.0006066745,0.82416326,0.002454737,0.05175548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044632194,0.0001640755,0.012918711,0.003201362,0.00004586533,0.007024925,0.15433711,0.0017742333,0.0056651523,0.5723651,0.24232757,0.0001311768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021379152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003462303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024658734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048057395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007521854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13040942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220704094","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4373","title":"INCOMMENSURABLE LEGAL CULTURES: INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS AND THE COLONIAL NARRATIVE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mythology; Ethnology; Narrative; Humanities; Sociology; History; Anthropology; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Literature; Ecology","score_opus":0.027444553619193755,"score_gpt":0.3330571556791615,"score_spread":0.30561260205996776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220704094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6739665,0.010476778,0.0009667662,0.018793387,0.00019229988,0.000019277812,0.000013223908,0.000009861019,0.29556194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99367344,0.0016640746,0.00015975212,0.0005129503,0.000036297577,0.000008470381,0.0000028942302,0.0000051739207,0.003936925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967655,0.0019092466,0.000099851975,0.00020439796,0.00049228803,0.00052877684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966413,0.0020429348,0.00044136672,0.00020240742,0.00021755337,0.0004544249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029860497,0.00023302827,0.0002848165,0.0012790997,0.019062692,0.0075089787,0.0010058513,0.0013990366,0.0023645868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005385556,0.00023665983,0.00015047812,0.0013999229,0.043503374,0.0067592845,0.006599265,0.003823917,0.00012110852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046822065,0.000012008829,0.00080503157,0.000025531566,0.000002606647,0.0004423417,0.72882795,0.000020619342,0.00006559641,0.2659068,0.00064163154,0.003245156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012620764,0.000034477842,0.0046560382,0.0005565384,0.000015688336,0.0007471191,0.7792856,0.00020017668,0.00022670641,0.0772138,0.13702041,0.00003085511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05961475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071840756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05961475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072007794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004224848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11853552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229024471","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4409","title":"THE WOMAN WHO FELL FROM THE SKY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Diversity and Impact of Dance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fell; Sky; Reflection (computer programming); Art; Geology; Meteorology; Computer science; Physics; Paleontology","score_opus":0.03896990331932001,"score_gpt":0.3130088029355826,"score_spread":0.2740388996162626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229024471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006908665,0.010602767,0.00076340133,0.3714436,0.07297279,0.00009061107,0.00029261527,0.00015243191,0.5367731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019703846,0.0019639907,0.0001538402,0.0368968,0.003229267,0.00002981532,0.00003698085,0.00013419449,0.9378513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993538,0.00017695756,0.000014966714,0.00008616223,0.00017324982,0.00019485764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993345,0.00014273851,0.00002963745,0.000036532576,0.00019651494,0.0002599572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007781635,0.00064204144,0.00035378616,0.0005678651,0.014984483,0.003667951,0.0006282479,0.0038019125,0.05438291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003353517,0.00035010366,0.0004008319,0.00046383817,0.003395778,0.0031386483,0.0033036987,0.012411288,0.012562192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015848156,0.00001270313,0.00011981468,0.00002621118,0.0000018431081,0.00035664986,0.009399619,0.000007639456,0.00015225835,0.007895144,0.97237974,0.009632596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013805725,0.0000068679287,0.00019782333,0.000073950796,9.828716e-7,0.0002221847,0.013449274,0.0000034707089,0.00005377567,0.0005115024,0.98547447,0.0000042150423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033071153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10434351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05438291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028015943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00312589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18192893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245236174","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4505","title":"Implications of the Internet for Quasi-Legislative Instruments of Regulation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Pace; The Internet; Legislature; Openness to experience; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Point (geometry); Public relations; Law; Psychology; History; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.046258174562250176,"score_gpt":0.30275521261169713,"score_spread":0.25649703804944696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245236174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0398845,0.0039383564,0.015875533,0.0920157,0.0005524567,0.000103885344,0.00024168215,0.0000757178,0.84731215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95701975,0.00170955,0.0031789998,0.016728675,0.00077877636,0.0004283758,0.00008776897,0.000055935696,0.020012246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971238,0.018482165,0.00084757275,0.002656692,0.004416876,0.0023586184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92002976,0.06325355,0.0038952676,0.008167893,0.0035402847,0.0011132926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02165107,0.0003116457,0.00050367444,0.0024168189,0.0073595387,0.013220526,0.0018896754,0.0080527,0.018153638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050385546,0.00045449592,0.0009285486,0.003276542,0.036218215,0.017444763,0.00613708,0.008890251,0.0013616002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005804238,0.000015716761,0.00018564891,0.000009580811,0.0000017407614,0.000016788938,0.00037935257,0.000062148545,0.0000134982165,0.9971228,0.00082833995,0.0013585559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003640281,0.000030404,0.0013842154,0.00015445639,0.000010415238,0.00006377709,0.0016012093,0.00066117186,0.00016866668,0.956497,0.039376006,0.00001630718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046364735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003144629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02165107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005768379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060519436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114503205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257497325","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4519","title":"SHIFTING GROUND, SOLID FOUNDATIONS: IMAGINING A NEW PARADIGM FOR CANADIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ENGAGEMENT","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil society; Public administration; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Politics; Government (linguistics); Accountability; Democracy; Dissenting opinion; Public relations; Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.18896545694486405,"score_gpt":0.405369293527524,"score_spread":0.21640383658265994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257497325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032543715,0.009008053,0.01025925,0.323579,0.0016065567,0.00016947842,0.00024217856,0.00016946546,0.6224224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8558067,0.010462392,0.015570273,0.021668881,0.00025922083,0.00019968853,0.00019095706,0.00023879267,0.09560317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903467,0.0027920518,0.00013678438,0.00073957,0.0024887777,0.0034961044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940713,0.0011620888,0.00018157889,0.00032321323,0.0016060624,0.0026557588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070807086,0.0008978722,0.0005712833,0.0039217654,0.055726334,0.025462603,0.0035024716,0.0059726164,0.011749311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075167255,0.00056004635,0.0005786888,0.005419055,0.069129266,0.012067966,0.011826894,0.008953863,0.0009831927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013519918,0.00001753441,0.00091740704,0.00007518329,0.00000397635,0.00021062764,0.05236124,0.00027185876,0.00014851708,0.88866824,0.034772996,0.0225388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015891288,0.000021015647,0.0016333665,0.00037673014,0.000012420653,0.00012478218,0.113979794,0.0007756037,0.00016873193,0.21924211,0.66358286,0.000066644614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99407095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2525275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2525275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34484357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86696213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260104550","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4515","title":"FROM ENFORCEMENT TO INTEGRATION: INFUSING ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION-MAKING WITH HUMAN RIGHTS VALUES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Human rights; Business; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.0703517731430841,"score_gpt":0.3463030135256195,"score_spread":0.2759512403825354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260104550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055736516,0.0046387427,0.17734,0.07891482,0.0008087692,0.00019000132,0.000036503778,0.00023509347,0.6820995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94517887,0.0013000045,0.02236968,0.0065048095,0.00048004184,0.00017260679,0.000027018274,0.0001588699,0.02380816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9625433,0.02020907,0.0016246092,0.0031015128,0.009269355,0.0032521184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97489625,0.013455882,0.0023060236,0.0052919104,0.0026738045,0.0013761638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03375493,0.00065587385,0.0007881179,0.0027309875,0.009176332,0.026908439,0.0024892965,0.0058933897,0.0044975984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030006941,0.00085934065,0.0009047156,0.0020400593,0.07508378,0.023973674,0.017977739,0.012768946,0.00090640126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007821881,0.000019160458,0.00034117262,0.00001680234,0.000004683031,0.000058118607,0.0046727955,0.00024220454,0.000080667,0.98088604,0.0009904768,0.012680128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022064716,0.000059638856,0.0008352178,0.00048762516,0.000017372407,0.00012880383,0.0061883745,0.0010396437,0.0006465527,0.8797812,0.110748865,0.000044673405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091933245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007535706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03375493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010289389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018526612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17851526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260238739","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4378","title":"THE CROWN’S FIDUCIARY DUTIES TO ABORIGINAL PEOPLES AS AN ASPECT OF CLIMATE JUSTICE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Fiduciary; Climate justice; Justiciability; Redress; Law; Political science; Threatened species; Environmental ethics; Duty; Subsistence agriculture; Arctic; Common law; Indigenous; Climate change; Sociology; Geography; Human rights; Archaeology; Ecology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.026924269353843944,"score_gpt":0.377159018626133,"score_spread":0.35023474927228904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260238739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19663107,0.011049218,0.0028707255,0.10153756,0.00089063274,0.000087268825,0.00009661925,0.000048586266,0.6867883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479301,0.00178664,0.0007903752,0.0075450973,0.0001298482,0.000016811868,0.000017553144,0.000014193877,0.041769266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602616,0.0007502634,0.00008101882,0.00023742505,0.0010231864,0.0018820157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969995,0.0008123222,0.00018754932,0.00018295734,0.000915471,0.00090214994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026080965,0.00019994653,0.00033591443,0.0007245813,0.019838236,0.007523598,0.0010781017,0.004630784,0.0026000647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051516746,0.00019486218,0.00022867361,0.0009630325,0.01884435,0.002317566,0.00372176,0.004940228,0.00018814027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018637906,0.000027116233,0.0035143157,0.00005178663,0.000009920943,0.0006596853,0.07258856,0.00028351965,0.00045200967,0.8839297,0.02066045,0.017804334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016061766,0.000073155774,0.024532966,0.00049389875,0.00005405689,0.0009429046,0.09042741,0.0008914978,0.00074121775,0.14611882,0.73558193,0.00012601032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8557148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9224091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1442852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026824763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05844245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2902698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265698276","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4411","title":"WE ARE ALL HERE TO STAY? INDIGENEITY, MIGRATION, AND ‘DECOLONIZING’ THE TREATY RIGHT TO BE HERE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Indigenous; Treaty; Colonialism; Decolonization; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; History; Politics; Ecology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.039979801221548504,"score_gpt":0.3347082536826407,"score_spread":0.2947284524610922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265698276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10817553,0.025765318,0.0037905558,0.41392583,0.0020109864,0.000028270046,0.000077886856,0.000047416255,0.44617817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167487,0.007550079,0.0006931014,0.021931868,0.00044701065,0.000023610064,0.00003580209,0.00006245746,0.052507356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959109,0.0011012709,0.000057541674,0.00027935,0.00071459124,0.0019363827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984346,0.00054402614,0.00016580323,0.000113185786,0.0003220024,0.00042046583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035541079,0.0002960728,0.00041552863,0.00070230995,0.022141777,0.008563211,0.0014771473,0.003044164,0.0049064322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052029593,0.0001376717,0.000253139,0.001387039,0.058401484,0.0058453428,0.0045358883,0.0086259525,0.00036999007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011259519,0.000012492222,0.000811433,0.00004301147,0.000005257805,0.0001583361,0.07595836,0.00009776037,0.00012747111,0.88880885,0.01859753,0.015368291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012959642,0.000019919082,0.0040200623,0.0007300458,0.000019033296,0.00024825815,0.16579714,0.0001966031,0.00029505545,0.16344096,0.665163,0.000056984365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84895515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.880488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15104485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033339437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062015746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3038687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272975401","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4568","title":"Cardboard Boxes and Invisible Fences: Homelessness and Public Space in City of Victoria v. Adams","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Victory; Normative; Sociology; Autonomy; Public space; Economic Justice; Poverty; Law; Meaning (existential); Space (punctuation); Political science; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Politics; History; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.041755369473819644,"score_gpt":0.3374319252273366,"score_spread":0.295676555753517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272975401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6874327,0.010458411,0.0009964292,0.10098097,0.00042077852,0.000072660965,0.00007820656,0.000012022085,0.19954775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97970515,0.0018282826,0.00008509584,0.006860298,0.00004953108,0.000022017759,0.0000084369985,0.000005991681,0.011435122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972042,0.00090553594,0.00006376489,0.00016417065,0.00043848154,0.0012238635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983364,0.00083755236,0.00022588491,0.00004569234,0.00018092003,0.00037361833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017948876,0.00021604335,0.0003206261,0.0008875089,0.02845812,0.007333282,0.0015750214,0.0057470687,0.0027771946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037917385,0.00052150356,0.0002785215,0.0012344767,0.022093005,0.003634852,0.0069569927,0.007991858,0.00011901065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036415415,0.00004372384,0.004237769,0.00010424653,0.00000869198,0.0030334534,0.20386475,0.00020399621,0.0003099094,0.7661556,0.012835126,0.009166301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038508693,0.00007319216,0.019029824,0.0009955049,0.000058716058,0.0012469317,0.5508452,0.0004158007,0.000878246,0.08202418,0.34422186,0.00017212145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.616073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7631504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.616073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024930172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019449757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.772376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272998328","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4482","title":"Of Minors and the Mentally Ill: Re-positioning Perspectives on Consent to Health Care","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mentally ill; Health care; Medicine; Psychiatry; Psychology; Political science; Mental health; Law; Mental illness","score_opus":0.08557305990820874,"score_gpt":0.39822079707736324,"score_spread":0.3126477371691545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272998328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084770784,0.043035902,0.004315534,0.76979625,0.0023479424,0.000038233364,0.000042114658,0.000015130988,0.09563813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090349,0.020285388,0.0011988438,0.057525504,0.0018742372,0.000051467305,0.000026219977,0.000041090407,0.009962299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98896176,0.008188035,0.00037131127,0.00042552073,0.00084594433,0.001207285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854117,0.010899806,0.0006044863,0.00046523623,0.00078871,0.0018300104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015917405,0.00039877094,0.00062142423,0.0010712959,0.008129756,0.0067316405,0.0012794964,0.008531128,0.0022470613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01917485,0.00037890655,0.00060233864,0.0007703127,0.059081215,0.012785402,0.009567177,0.01700261,0.00022037911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022978178,0.00002265177,0.00089976983,0.00007974906,0.0000056224917,0.00086885213,0.17966324,0.00006451781,0.00015937108,0.79803324,0.0104556205,0.009724397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032529046,0.000086903856,0.001916358,0.0014497851,0.000014860082,0.002684695,0.18475261,0.00022758964,0.00021088484,0.5025995,0.30596858,0.0000557726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019540705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030591164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019540705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00888427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009134243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084180295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273188823","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4550","title":"Legislation’s Influence on Judiciarization: Examining the Effects of Statutory Structure and Language on Rates of Court Use in Child Welfare Contexts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Welfare; Statutory law; Legislature; Political science; Context (archaeology); Referral; Law; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Medicine; Geography; Nursing","score_opus":0.0235774031170085,"score_gpt":0.3124123180377488,"score_spread":0.2888349149207403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273188823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906238,0.00030918352,0.00011495458,0.0006893611,0.000008260642,0.00002680714,0.00012740352,0.000004196763,0.00809611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879825,0.00012152723,0.00007294537,0.00010343324,0.0000058766695,0.000011361419,0.000075652664,0.000005200079,0.00080581394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.987164,0.005226105,0.00037893697,0.0010504166,0.0035892464,0.0025912973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94995606,0.020651463,0.016834943,0.0015348474,0.007266678,0.0037559536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067035104,0.0001861876,0.0004140745,0.0023579842,0.0037529813,0.003036417,0.001648954,0.00079697144,0.0032295743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045802996,0.0002677525,0.0003750222,0.0032478415,0.0040234295,0.0008391309,0.0020372286,0.001368121,0.00025870252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014669218,0.0001345955,0.9564827,0.00003598747,0.0001052183,0.00024916467,0.024865646,0.00041559595,0.00082067424,0.0021390487,0.0007646713,0.01384004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005297775,0.00003916042,0.98945147,0.00003316267,0.000018221901,0.000022451228,0.008840306,0.00018971293,0.00013207205,0.000102975486,0.0011543508,0.000010872049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88738555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9517048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88738555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025248678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020439979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22655529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275482756","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4417","title":"THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: LESSONS FROM LAWYER-LICENSING REFORM","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Law; Legal profession; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07006859944101311,"score_gpt":0.39852298376303613,"score_spread":0.328454384322023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275482756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19908443,0.013419137,0.0017052715,0.438855,0.00060278916,0.00023250919,0.00019776222,0.000059253405,0.3458438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402044,0.004842081,0.0007542371,0.017706813,0.0002225978,0.00008851846,0.0000630241,0.000028013726,0.03609038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865345,0.0021855754,0.00022449894,0.00067050394,0.0035890585,0.006795972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818543,0.0046282257,0.0007629446,0.0006374881,0.004339547,0.0077774273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006409558,0.0003689324,0.0007790182,0.002704315,0.034789912,0.016643267,0.0035387552,0.0072869216,0.009918988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02031513,0.0003737687,0.0006219845,0.0047455127,0.044131294,0.0078116525,0.011973846,0.008102796,0.00035113937],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033706405,0.00013551877,0.006160993,0.00015366515,0.000016510414,0.0006058324,0.04856055,0.00065486773,0.00015695838,0.8838996,0.022751458,0.036870252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014116896,0.00009958208,0.06420975,0.0011125231,0.00007592795,0.00023342491,0.14221801,0.0019208381,0.00042510018,0.1722869,0.61709464,0.00018215923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99342304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31634963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31634963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4927484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7929375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278437627","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4531","title":"Unfinished Business: Canada’s Contribution to Promoting Compliance with International Humanitarian Law Through the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict Agenda of the United Nations Security Council","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Compliance (psychology); International humanitarian law; Armed conflict; Security council; International law; Law; Public administration; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.09066970407550064,"score_gpt":0.3214931555907834,"score_spread":0.23082345151528277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278437627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017954877,0.021589536,0.0021697294,0.48500535,0.004642558,0.00017580499,0.00076136563,0.00016200704,0.4675388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.317643,0.035528276,0.011723551,0.08253064,0.0014117835,0.00013969367,0.0011363369,0.0003236939,0.54956305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99335253,0.0005946097,0.000114517265,0.0002490172,0.0038276277,0.0018617588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865953,0.0017636291,0.0003846857,0.00033061093,0.004845544,0.0060801697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031806869,0.0003801528,0.00030260795,0.002657937,0.021921175,0.013949591,0.0016180589,0.0038688416,0.008175605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008589451,0.00042804336,0.00035725135,0.003522093,0.0059962217,0.0031828014,0.0035841048,0.005421228,0.00078641763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031143943,0.00008784573,0.0031764263,0.00027894072,0.000012151329,0.00044462344,0.009225116,0.00034212664,0.0002129488,0.2255834,0.6463752,0.11423007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008454358,0.000009537417,0.0037626687,0.0001641292,0.0000081324615,0.000041313087,0.00276154,0.00012317166,0.00015790988,0.004323909,0.98861516,0.000024121739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11693836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11693836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3961831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84845114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278469572","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4416","title":"INSTITUTIONAL INEQUALITY AND THE DYNAMICS OF COURAGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Status quo; Courage; Political science; Solidarity; Power (physics); Sociology; Inequality; Welfare economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04119052759485642,"score_gpt":0.34313834799685616,"score_spread":0.30194782040199974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278469572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21842587,0.0039060793,0.029914174,0.0308452,0.00030239593,0.00006944601,0.00006334406,0.0001723235,0.71630114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914846,0.00048930914,0.0010356565,0.00037748044,0.00005463588,0.000032896984,0.000011645738,0.00003788738,0.006475997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943862,0.0032724221,0.000117642936,0.0007319277,0.00075304945,0.00073882437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243367,0.0039520576,0.0010833493,0.0009740724,0.0005467689,0.0010101151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005164979,0.00038678746,0.000415744,0.0017502052,0.009132422,0.015673673,0.0011696272,0.0023311567,0.007639375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012399891,0.00031380428,0.0003901885,0.0012633584,0.05567439,0.011758278,0.0128028495,0.0034837157,0.0006703527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136730605,0.00001278026,0.0005887495,0.000019551604,0.000004065117,0.0001433904,0.022715144,0.0003258551,0.00010542155,0.97018564,0.0006467715,0.0052388366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015077683,0.0000243865,0.0009923925,0.00009352839,0.000006344815,0.00010521088,0.012371856,0.00083017943,0.00016743495,0.92132765,0.06403822,0.00002771735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049466128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040099123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015673673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065017403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004119445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04717362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279423935","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4540","title":"Quiet Contributions: Re-Examining the Benefits of a Restorative Approach to Sentencing in the Aboriginal Context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Statutory law; Sentencing guidelines; Punishment (psychology); Economic Justice; Criminal law; Theory of criminal justice; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sentence; Geography","score_opus":0.07348146613082397,"score_gpt":0.36897695296857314,"score_spread":0.2954954868377492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279423935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1669636,0.018656252,0.0124773905,0.28469667,0.009853194,0.0002901837,0.00010555384,0.00013597478,0.50682116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024474,0.009846869,0.005148575,0.022502746,0.00200573,0.00015457136,0.000048438666,0.000101001555,0.057744667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98751885,0.007228249,0.00030761008,0.00062484865,0.0029547093,0.0013658092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761456,0.0135114575,0.0012040467,0.0014988689,0.0060458765,0.0015941566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012741091,0.00050042913,0.0003696971,0.0021293447,0.020718453,0.014506026,0.0043599247,0.004860366,0.0041349065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038216677,0.00033364087,0.0006523755,0.0017314975,0.02301937,0.008228813,0.009365477,0.010625147,0.0007984468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008062234,0.00010495069,0.0050105406,0.00040200492,0.000033077467,0.0010830299,0.2403219,0.0008726837,0.00059628516,0.65607804,0.030642537,0.06477426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027310478,0.0002505253,0.013682116,0.0016444374,0.00017743283,0.000908074,0.39356047,0.0013398998,0.0013981564,0.13523208,0.45168787,0.00009157418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17059793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32145825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8294021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024734285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039539196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33920985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279874743","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4413","title":"A REFLECTION ON BEING BORN BAD AND LAW’S OTHER VIOLENCES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Humanities; Political science; Art; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.04075795924783338,"score_gpt":0.3555728734242023,"score_spread":0.3148149141763689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279874743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017898802,0.018199382,0.00028910325,0.90860105,0.038749985,0.000014052762,0.00012266643,0.000017927536,0.03221602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06662529,0.030862238,0.0005937816,0.60449284,0.029536735,0.0001444784,0.00017910884,0.00037737767,0.2671882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942351,0.003289546,0.00020458708,0.0004353543,0.0009603936,0.00087503396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865232,0.008486038,0.0004121759,0.0006205262,0.0022951877,0.0016629448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007882235,0.0011001728,0.0008690241,0.0013215314,0.012681172,0.008771083,0.002039081,0.012858826,0.022417797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020957753,0.00076234725,0.0008004783,0.0014199587,0.014763704,0.019506225,0.0075387917,0.04164601,0.004593133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012185995,0.000017637962,0.00010145592,0.000065276494,0.0000060157176,0.00011640245,0.031824403,0.000014798474,0.000052264688,0.022768,0.9358725,0.009149107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004636774,0.000008581984,0.0003433058,0.0005279579,0.0000049402515,0.00014295508,0.045298193,0.000008995884,0.000064035434,0.0068564964,0.94672465,0.000015316427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046282902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09653276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046282902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007976312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011573343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09202701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282293003","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4414","title":"“FICTIONAL VISIONS”: AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL REFLECTIONS ON RE-READING THE ALCHEMY OF RACE AND RIGHTS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Alchemy; Vision; Narrative; Reading (process); Politics; Race (biology); Law; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Literature; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.08293260776188556,"score_gpt":0.43388478965345184,"score_spread":0.3509521818915663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282293003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061019436,0.019505752,0.011792696,0.46225592,0.019411108,0.00010776497,0.00029906438,0.0002444208,0.42536375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72488797,0.00733992,0.0024658327,0.06450506,0.0055881813,0.00013339239,0.00018028413,0.000989671,0.19390966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597555,0.002866384,0.000058080986,0.00033470895,0.00035202343,0.00041324412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935855,0.0047510983,0.00024585327,0.00045900285,0.000556509,0.00040204226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005186787,0.0012900695,0.0005884624,0.0019878575,0.018064044,0.011058599,0.0018999848,0.0073561394,0.01222824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0133380825,0.0005217845,0.0005240793,0.0014929639,0.05099876,0.016219214,0.0071919076,0.027777318,0.0017466672],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027954717,0.000031469834,0.00012274085,0.000081516315,0.0000074968575,0.0004277504,0.5981548,0.000072629926,0.00035115058,0.29324824,0.10008455,0.0073897014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008615865,0.0000119240285,0.0002290536,0.0002501599,0.000006355098,0.00030800933,0.19441716,0.00008039671,0.000431141,0.033397317,0.77083904,0.000020757374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023073593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034875214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023073593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010331214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038342497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07495856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283609105","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4535","title":"Applying IHL Targeting Rules to Practical Situations: Proportionality and Military Objectives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); International humanitarian law; Political science; Operations research; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.043247995522731834,"score_gpt":0.38808964183540984,"score_spread":0.344841646312678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283609105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02729757,0.0006219075,0.29191655,0.027515328,0.00048131472,0.00037314906,0.0002416261,0.00035891388,0.65119374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8068589,0.0005255307,0.14475964,0.005276052,0.00036997395,0.00068493315,0.000117302574,0.00020627787,0.041201413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98631173,0.006682201,0.0011097699,0.0012525949,0.0031466668,0.0014970289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813934,0.01197505,0.0017492983,0.0019278906,0.0025156764,0.00043875072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013947486,0.0007501259,0.0007707565,0.0024771083,0.0039246147,0.0122344205,0.0027395906,0.004889768,0.00815075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031621907,0.00068263296,0.0010539673,0.0017333686,0.022301916,0.010456636,0.006377192,0.0065073795,0.0017012991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008535489,0.000013508023,0.00033585462,0.00004207377,0.000004800178,0.000177232,0.0022884193,0.0012736497,0.00006876655,0.98059857,0.004599287,0.010589247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021456734,0.000030497735,0.00077474164,0.00021879585,0.0000137521365,0.0003236956,0.0024651582,0.006141577,0.000595496,0.93592703,0.05344393,0.000043873704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008999456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008344561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013947486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073564253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00398479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07376224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290993188","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4549","title":"Taking Workers’ Rights Seriously: Private Prosecutions of Employment Standards Violations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Business; Compliance (psychology); Law; Stigma (botany); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.0647588706876264,"score_gpt":0.37551215272765415,"score_spread":0.3107532820400277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290993188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34671256,0.0056259995,0.009040912,0.22299711,0.0009700254,0.00020822065,0.0001696628,0.0001035756,0.4141719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9172598,0.0019243622,0.002131875,0.011604197,0.00029498962,0.00005581157,0.000056548623,0.00003281475,0.066639565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927343,0.00173048,0.0002923975,0.00044904868,0.0024667385,0.0023270126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902513,0.0033811629,0.0013691587,0.0010658668,0.0024118335,0.0015207529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004503347,0.00019899689,0.000274179,0.00095109193,0.014632009,0.0058111674,0.001425653,0.005108916,0.0048268326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014934088,0.00034083298,0.0002706342,0.0009452539,0.010199716,0.0032300993,0.004535195,0.003703602,0.00045649623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082883445,0.00020549673,0.0677215,0.00035550765,0.0000377022,0.005180614,0.19213447,0.0008932579,0.0032404417,0.37318054,0.099483944,0.25748366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057353765,0.00015917738,0.08800718,0.00094270083,0.00006191688,0.0023910138,0.1054246,0.0013870662,0.0018416028,0.05001199,0.7496133,0.000102130514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55031073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7717441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55031073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015872763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049100902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9046751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299262332","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4530","title":"Prisonniers de Guerre aux Mains de Leur Puissance D’origine : Pour Une Application des Conventions de Genève Jusqu’à Leur « Libération et Rapatriement Définitifs »","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Repatriation; Spanish Civil War; Law; Terrorism; Opposition (politics); Humanities; Nationality; Ethnology; Sociology; Politics; Immigration; Art","score_opus":0.06562950516028106,"score_gpt":0.3932945938510184,"score_spread":0.32766508869073735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299262332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16347043,0.09349751,0.08061852,0.11240319,0.011618226,0.0005650162,0.0003911644,0.00040667935,0.5370293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7597891,0.015784167,0.037598755,0.008453077,0.0016206737,0.00063967437,0.00021678807,0.00024957725,0.17564827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567527,0.0023096972,0.0002263609,0.00044496148,0.0007749576,0.00056874467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969568,0.0015617,0.0003328279,0.0003435139,0.00056488736,0.00024027124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053528515,0.0006007611,0.0005150106,0.000655537,0.005915744,0.007112328,0.0011254605,0.0045743505,0.004595122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007878842,0.00034541637,0.0005970411,0.00052097166,0.007186813,0.0053055324,0.0030883392,0.0067254347,0.0008464233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048429483,0.000016913362,0.00082901533,0.00016030631,0.0000070790784,0.0004789618,0.016365385,0.00021239849,0.0005983686,0.9488928,0.009489058,0.02290129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019545014,0.000094713956,0.0035662751,0.0009229048,0.000011561246,0.00054664735,0.009275934,0.00050198374,0.0010801891,0.05942141,0.92448664,0.00007209404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04270351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044485286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04270351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046377457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055041923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084909916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323209304","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4481","title":"The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Implications for the Equality Rights of Canadians with Disabilities: The Case for Education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Balance (ability); Convention; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law; Public administration; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11678599316186042,"score_gpt":0.37101095248984167,"score_spread":0.2542249593279813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323209304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009381932,0.021877194,0.0029781035,0.236182,0.004469906,0.00015335636,0.00040273988,0.000037783087,0.7245169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3930491,0.034888256,0.013069664,0.16869451,0.001823561,0.00039538217,0.00044314668,0.0001774685,0.3874589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800711,0.002867877,0.000494522,0.0011419959,0.01011995,0.00530445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081844,0.0028886779,0.00040480745,0.00049694604,0.0036707928,0.0017203455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014164394,0.0006843494,0.00075581926,0.0025241335,0.035196893,0.01175987,0.003127693,0.01295867,0.0064911996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016898697,0.00048038835,0.00065288245,0.0038009556,0.02996256,0.0051448066,0.006239784,0.013135771,0.00068885455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010297144,0.000014757377,0.0004580663,0.000051278003,0.0000043985124,0.00021089162,0.009687693,0.00011427084,0.00012451533,0.89423794,0.078020856,0.017065143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060478687,0.000009844466,0.001547951,0.0004141815,0.000008381146,0.00010994856,0.0058014295,0.00009217692,0.00010778947,0.027523467,0.9643078,0.00007099733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97430634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9812816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06454454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06454454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20952235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46830565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343392338","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4545","title":"What Does it Take to Travel Philosophically Light? A Response to Nielsen","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Criticism; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice; Liberal education; Tribute; Politics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; International relations; Liberal arts education","score_opus":0.10326998472915945,"score_gpt":0.37698644029506423,"score_spread":0.2737164555659048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343392338","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031729153,0.0036404568,0.0002682366,0.9897507,0.0043086526,0.0000019280176,0.00000956164,0.00001333804,0.0016899273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03310941,0.009333573,0.0021440447,0.93029165,0.011820275,0.00004629531,0.000028572023,0.00020292631,0.013023252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874858,0.005813636,0.00070984935,0.0016044632,0.0034045114,0.0009817095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93058527,0.04988232,0.0017815924,0.0015551808,0.010995318,0.0052004303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019179711,0.0009928874,0.0017455019,0.0014027482,0.007798351,0.010995117,0.0041236784,0.027939282,0.005937367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05098907,0.0008533269,0.001196588,0.0020117394,0.02559997,0.026951818,0.0052031223,0.0439536,0.0025103122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060688457,0.000031038217,0.00022801326,0.00017306166,0.000016279335,0.00018105081,0.0060863583,0.00016157463,0.00011687969,0.17305085,0.8092895,0.010604725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003798052,0.000031142834,0.0003682594,0.0007798966,0.000011856479,0.00036798854,0.009812795,0.00049481145,0.00022180656,0.123202994,0.8645222,0.00014827137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022030791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025821129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027939282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075702234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012126177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10143328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344254071","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4514","title":"WEIGHING THE OPTIONS: A LEGAL APPROACH TO CHILDHOOD OBESITY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Humanities; Childhood obesity; Psychosocial; Political science; Obesity; Psychology; Medicine; Art; Overweight; Psychiatry; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.145770339598534,"score_gpt":0.4480399490024814,"score_spread":0.3022696094039474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344254071","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00682742,0.008527072,0.02034461,0.63029075,0.0028877014,0.000096048374,0.00011106108,0.0000809009,0.3308344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58014387,0.0180137,0.04482241,0.19450475,0.0031133546,0.00032047275,0.00018563413,0.00023280339,0.15866295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922557,0.0032633655,0.00029427887,0.000606812,0.0021210997,0.0014587701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99262345,0.0031016136,0.00043315045,0.00045411702,0.0019575423,0.0014301382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011385284,0.00055492535,0.0005938318,0.002655195,0.019681316,0.009937155,0.003202278,0.00928689,0.009511491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014948665,0.00041048604,0.00077109766,0.0016265281,0.06677952,0.009429384,0.008631593,0.017843781,0.0009126912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004433794,0.000019884385,0.0005387022,0.000041149447,0.000004347589,0.00024955702,0.012720224,0.00011517514,0.00007542522,0.9382733,0.033851266,0.01410653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095639,0.000020097645,0.0011951723,0.00076003076,0.000015542273,0.00054949254,0.036274686,0.00029421726,0.00016457538,0.52104586,0.43962345,0.00004727758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2822794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5112162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2822794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024541372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050402246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56127274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345535582","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4512","title":"EXPLORING A LAW FIRM BUSINESS MODEL TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Business model; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.23086943353828068,"score_gpt":0.297934905801743,"score_spread":0.0670654722634623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345535582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4971585,0.001217778,0.026376026,0.05307149,0.00012960169,0.00081298355,0.0005252066,0.0002931452,0.42041534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675087,0.00061755144,0.0076956265,0.0011674734,0.000021263111,0.00010169481,0.00014044419,0.00002420421,0.022723116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649674,0.0012258292,0.000054279735,0.00034633308,0.0005005854,0.0013762154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949319,0.0011011976,0.00034000824,0.00023603061,0.0009025037,0.002488416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393364,0.00031229382,0.00028763126,0.0019336148,0.008207577,0.014188898,0.0023382674,0.0029835836,0.018263428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061347797,0.0003463845,0.00037939614,0.0025210585,0.0042482223,0.0041777063,0.0043348204,0.0027096584,0.001586357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014402342,0.0022710082,0.07790624,0.00022540733,0.000056481233,0.0021800546,0.013593744,0.0118471,0.0017683393,0.77262574,0.025271893,0.09211001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005224838,0.0010277538,0.0773705,0.0010119792,0.00021468491,0.000907558,0.14509554,0.10656713,0.0017905816,0.22387236,0.44141456,0.00020482762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5360609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71188515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5360609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036831852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060433377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9333426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346395395","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4518","title":"THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT TO HOUSING & THE CANADIAN CHARTER: A CASE COMMENT ON TANUDJAJA V. CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Covenant; Cultural rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.08000862500583227,"score_gpt":0.36071883352819145,"score_spread":0.2807102085223592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346395395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09890631,0.016175607,0.0016404521,0.41165236,0.0034909707,0.000461656,0.0009863902,0.000135687,0.46655056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55887616,0.0068205954,0.0019249752,0.23014753,0.00074919657,0.00022998148,0.00027997128,0.00011967995,0.2008519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991148,0.00068950694,0.00015705815,0.00086295704,0.0031449671,0.003997455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997018,0.0009161518,0.00013662818,0.000071645176,0.0011496005,0.00070799375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036716298,0.00085800164,0.0006513198,0.0018175219,0.0497692,0.012329984,0.0040651113,0.020633286,0.0050120815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007243015,0.0009339565,0.0011322141,0.002808167,0.01298567,0.0020098905,0.0029139968,0.015799353,0.00035714338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005960533,0.00007724589,0.005864896,0.0001741248,0.000045733865,0.0038171466,0.031049985,0.0007774505,0.00094367366,0.57088894,0.37462476,0.011676376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006731021,0.000050149283,0.013785728,0.00042663165,0.0001402258,0.0005582653,0.031243494,0.0012767114,0.0009733832,0.012542973,0.9385272,0.00040790974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13969418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13969418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22532313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346680361","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4513","title":"RELIGION AND LAW IN R V NS: FINDING SPACE TO RE-THINK THE BALANCING ANALYSIS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Diversity (politics); Critical reflection; Space (punctuation); Law; Sociology; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04927093395199516,"score_gpt":0.35742571655138944,"score_spread":0.3081547825993943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346680361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055740148,0.01496392,0.044358846,0.3175339,0.0029039758,0.00006078986,0.00005097929,0.00008073534,0.5643067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439243,0.0038743312,0.010682245,0.017423632,0.00067714683,0.000053655916,0.00003524248,0.00008402932,0.023245322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99137914,0.006040154,0.00016654107,0.00044363603,0.0013586795,0.00061179657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993129,0.004864246,0.0002759641,0.0005054566,0.0008283184,0.00039700174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012414251,0.0002930293,0.0004344257,0.0016262718,0.0089166835,0.010139333,0.0019089817,0.0048075486,0.0048704855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013466699,0.00022312005,0.00034068146,0.0013950651,0.044140007,0.019946668,0.0054280786,0.010421554,0.00043857456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004062043,0.0000049663745,0.00010374685,0.0000150929545,0.0000015716154,0.00007077215,0.012133841,0.00009604308,0.000040851643,0.9761177,0.004399027,0.0070122993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049209466,0.0000071665067,0.00020016075,0.00017599386,0.0000025648283,0.000048491176,0.024685306,0.00033811596,0.00011896432,0.82094604,0.15345982,0.000012571928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042773996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056509502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042773996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012236168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011328379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088779986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347121535","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4583","title":"INTRODUCTION: GRADUATE STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; CONTEST; Economic Justice; Sociology; Windsor; Law; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.2810159753811594,"score_gpt":0.48420982775155286,"score_spread":0.20319385237039345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347121535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073296885,0.038534883,0.0011061337,0.18482712,0.27875206,0.00031426203,0.0019986888,0.0007161785,0.49301773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006500003,0.016323585,0.00093451043,0.040722255,0.07801774,0.00028990838,0.0016441635,0.00065076136,0.85491717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931272,0.0009025561,0.00046430706,0.0008492548,0.0036566423,0.001000099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98818725,0.0014311094,0.0005291801,0.0012589872,0.0042822673,0.004311137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046276376,0.001377812,0.0014199236,0.0036089541,0.0055022216,0.017327378,0.0030159715,0.0086061405,0.3052008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019008191,0.0006885812,0.0009963774,0.004987248,0.0027622012,0.010316277,0.0097107915,0.008157259,0.20412028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052569503,0.00001549634,0.000052943047,0.000073447096,7.78992e-7,0.000015085643,0.000108007305,0.0000070062424,0.00002117012,0.0066959225,0.96601146,0.026993377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001679171,0.000007282295,0.00013336955,0.00013677432,3.8317128e-7,0.000012873847,0.00008711807,0.000005000349,0.0000061070136,0.0009690565,0.9986376,0.0000026674275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038884603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065213065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3052008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059758844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009055183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2369799645","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4520","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF SMALL CLAIMS COURT: RISING MONETARY LIMITS AND USE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Partition (number theory); Sociology; Mathematics; Art; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.10082545312982537,"score_gpt":0.27100063302034005,"score_spread":0.17017517989051467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2369799645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935917,0.00019705485,0.0000637228,0.00087967963,0.000004827381,0.0000092929695,0.00024289645,0.0000026650355,0.0050079846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986481,0.0000905566,0.00003021034,0.000039832496,0.000006066971,0.000003058667,0.00012035222,0.000002080557,0.0010597765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983487,0.00028101724,0.000092282324,0.00023705134,0.00065850513,0.0003824474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98766965,0.00253947,0.0047925194,0.00045510722,0.0021986861,0.002344621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013250604,0.00008429518,0.00023891295,0.0014634646,0.0018881882,0.003381017,0.0010300056,0.00087243825,0.0038757888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013744971,0.00021108825,0.0001603185,0.0020049193,0.0029636486,0.0016939258,0.001886163,0.0014144381,0.00031604496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027444187,0.00018076571,0.93727106,0.000041601932,0.00005644007,0.00079044874,0.035371356,0.0007262806,0.0013213359,0.004962179,0.0021421735,0.016861843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016539866,0.00002237527,0.9921543,0.000010762642,0.000003347546,0.00003810382,0.006153379,0.00014739847,0.00008420359,0.00015733883,0.0012186858,0.000008552735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66543216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8134902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66543216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015219299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052280305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6730764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504227454","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4516","title":"WHEN DISCIPLINES COLLIDE: POLYGAMY AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES ON TRIAL","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1590766274158785,"score_gpt":0.42674200413142765,"score_spread":0.26766537671554913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504227454","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039387036,0.030226577,0.0053616124,0.61596954,0.0025405034,0.000088579305,0.00007833514,0.000037260626,0.30631056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8459026,0.0116248,0.0026595478,0.11085625,0.0025408943,0.00025100287,0.000062172854,0.00007926755,0.026023455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9273409,0.04600542,0.0018640886,0.003930366,0.011726398,0.009132768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9022465,0.08112084,0.0031717103,0.003351694,0.0052671046,0.004842151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.064664826,0.00038392353,0.0012097182,0.0040652193,0.027943466,0.032833535,0.0029007501,0.018722842,0.008230931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121839106,0.0005591212,0.0005915434,0.0033931923,0.08619568,0.020984715,0.019665172,0.017239505,0.0009148817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003080189,0.000018926501,0.0014211802,0.000056304638,0.000011805988,0.00038191496,0.014554509,0.00010334806,0.000043105265,0.9464192,0.018729057,0.018229922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004633183,0.000031150958,0.002710004,0.0010307747,0.000022317197,0.00018265376,0.028218025,0.00030584345,0.00015646718,0.8328214,0.1344149,0.00006006223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094580345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14147992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094580345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021557404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047355812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3419844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506045944","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4682","title":"A Comparative View of Equality Under the UN Convention on the Rights of PERSONS with Disabilities and the Disability Laws of the United States and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Law; Convention","score_opus":0.13039640159392446,"score_gpt":0.3687301803499609,"score_spread":0.23833377875603645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506045944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070366506,0.017256148,0.0018659366,0.042290173,0.001048939,0.000050720155,0.00017476846,0.000017075849,0.9302595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7304615,0.0384743,0.0040006326,0.05645416,0.0015030283,0.00028283466,0.0003332991,0.00013297825,0.16835722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982441,0.0030806114,0.0002574617,0.0012615337,0.006888933,0.0060705454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577445,0.0011745783,0.0001536463,0.00018149718,0.0019465352,0.0007693378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064684427,0.0006486273,0.0010966768,0.0038874112,0.02986898,0.02553272,0.0032591252,0.008504469,0.0071619716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007360267,0.0004214363,0.0008974339,0.0047898088,0.04723852,0.007880591,0.006500173,0.013045773,0.0005920248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004723941,0.000004774049,0.00006816746,0.000014286467,0.0000020464352,0.000040822633,0.0028519374,0.00006271041,0.000023126859,0.9897738,0.004406268,0.0027475024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002983894,0.000025328909,0.003516489,0.0011368161,0.000029686493,0.00010735552,0.02069027,0.00039552443,0.00019346342,0.2516098,0.7221704,0.000094927585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.966085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97248524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13067876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13067876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17335929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9481452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510090481","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4684","title":"UNE PROCÉDURE EN DIFFICULTÉ: A BLUEPRINT FOR RESOLVING “SPECIAL” EDUCATION DISPUTES THROUGH A QUASI-INQUISITORIAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Process (computing); Administrative law; Political science; Public administration; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.09158201672369119,"score_gpt":0.45602372667372304,"score_spread":0.36444170995003183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510090481","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037546302,0.0020269107,0.56359816,0.32000786,0.005811055,0.0015566956,0.000054692828,0.000705497,0.10248448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19882697,0.0020553307,0.5862292,0.12817174,0.0048628123,0.006367233,0.00011413658,0.0009189987,0.072453626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.70815146,0.20130809,0.012336188,0.019899542,0.050522882,0.0077817645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78659797,0.14457656,0.006572791,0.03741054,0.018694825,0.0061472952],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.27472106,0.001358271,0.0016649623,0.004081614,0.022903185,0.029853793,0.008588733,0.031359635,0.006266561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20468295,0.0020300306,0.0030968837,0.0020610716,0.13379653,0.044313837,0.026707057,0.055195805,0.004822574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072099297,0.000028930375,0.00006818329,0.00003248724,0.0000037566924,0.000059166512,0.004462379,0.00014936866,0.00010605236,0.97733486,0.011294816,0.006452729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000806166,0.00008476189,0.00018399341,0.00045112727,0.000011524388,0.00023607338,0.0034838866,0.001430608,0.0004897615,0.6845388,0.3088901,0.00011869474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073448108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059158816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27472106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012550976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06941439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8943981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512364812","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4678","title":"AN INTRODUCTION TO EXPLORING LAW, DISABILITY, AND THE CHALLENGE OF EQUALITY IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES: PAPERS FROM THE BERKELEY SYMPOSIUM","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08863503913113079,"score_gpt":0.32989222137544344,"score_spread":0.24125718224431264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512364812","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017702081,0.5715897,0.00095322053,0.14811973,0.027294962,0.00007376349,0.0007336252,0.000096059135,0.2493687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07715857,0.5909325,0.0026618473,0.025624853,0.011882162,0.0002090375,0.00073434337,0.00027259003,0.29052424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963393,0.0005410706,0.00011391535,0.00024130926,0.0019761305,0.00078830187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995353,0.0009049201,0.00011810529,0.00015024119,0.0022436131,0.0012300881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028501211,0.0013961496,0.00080245506,0.0064258887,0.03068973,0.016932763,0.002072553,0.0044388934,0.0177693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004868653,0.00074546225,0.0007776794,0.011248385,0.012351197,0.005350316,0.004485511,0.0066220453,0.0020784324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007905206,0.000021216203,0.00022094302,0.00016376759,0.0000059923973,0.000061454506,0.005421846,0.000099182296,0.000056061628,0.066538066,0.9020651,0.025338346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016351937,0.0000023271907,0.00081058097,0.00061115,0.000004131113,0.000022633534,0.0040673898,0.000015352329,0.000029607883,0.0033207901,0.9910958,0.000018672354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9169094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96089846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10752473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10752473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13117704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7801502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518541179","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4688","title":"GROUNDING ACCESS TO JUSTICE THEORY AND PRACTICE IN THE EXPERIENCES OF WOMEN ABUSED BY THEIR INTIMATE PARTNERS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Conceptualization; Economic Justice; Domestic violence; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Poison control; Law; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.08339928655449998,"score_gpt":0.41954575439187247,"score_spread":0.3361464678373725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518541179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39152664,0.05201442,0.0053951363,0.08700673,0.0012102345,0.00014405762,0.00009555167,0.000028690194,0.46257848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603571,0.019603387,0.0008215649,0.0030162209,0.00017555113,0.0001269607,0.0000334372,0.00002904706,0.015836796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951742,0.0031149695,0.000112442605,0.00028777836,0.0006042512,0.00070634426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962991,0.0027002306,0.00026795093,0.00016537317,0.00015008857,0.00041729058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004799645,0.00036609048,0.0004569856,0.0025216737,0.012669607,0.012083428,0.0013871647,0.0026438762,0.0050076274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006873956,0.0003515882,0.000225612,0.0024330518,0.065237,0.016005136,0.01298213,0.0048083398,0.00027635228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005736115,0.00002395481,0.0012766558,0.00007428321,0.0000025768613,0.00029998148,0.77364564,0.000027789154,0.00006198934,0.20901024,0.0027634182,0.0128077585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004177226,0.000026827889,0.0041413405,0.0009934887,0.0000036646911,0.00039765835,0.8351164,0.00005263487,0.000050915824,0.06024502,0.09895459,0.000013327612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03258125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057075873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03258125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009379985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007459994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06805688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531021224","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4380","title":"DU MAUVAIS USAGE DE LA TRADITION RECONSTITUÉE : LA MÉDIATION EXTRAJUDICIAIRE EN CHINE","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"China; Mediation; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Economic Justice; People's Republic; Sociology; Law; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03362365252687576,"score_gpt":0.32970309075840404,"score_spread":0.29607943823152827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531021224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.237127,0.025828175,0.011184059,0.08154418,0.0011859661,0.0000926873,0.00017682069,0.0000977047,0.6427634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94697857,0.0055793193,0.0019021613,0.002529086,0.00029001312,0.00010189772,0.00003454318,0.000053321357,0.042531032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928975,0.0040259697,0.00021034456,0.0005457106,0.0015005383,0.0008199446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534553,0.0021558024,0.0004817844,0.0009407147,0.0006803618,0.00039580156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004995281,0.00030343013,0.0004151549,0.0015522742,0.00921501,0.006860899,0.0012110065,0.0028801318,0.008230203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007638421,0.00025148346,0.00044269842,0.0031832035,0.027851615,0.006749617,0.006174572,0.0044273753,0.00059681805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018631174,0.00001244935,0.0016623475,0.00009997883,0.0000081520575,0.00031129995,0.13962977,0.000045152006,0.0004630136,0.8336229,0.0029468075,0.021179512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025654464,0.000082817576,0.012624295,0.0013400924,0.000061035,0.0009980628,0.10257751,0.00040265566,0.0010647835,0.16709454,0.71363825,0.000090209214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056806028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13457024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056806028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008788853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014201816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11295074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549857026","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4681","title":"ADVOCACY FATIGUE: SELF-CARE, PROTEST, AND EDUCATIONAL EQUITY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Educational equity; Compassion; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.1379444325029854,"score_gpt":0.435669304331348,"score_spread":0.2977248718283626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549857026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5229106,0.01990844,0.005949571,0.24091724,0.0014797933,0.00011426514,0.000026740072,0.000066534165,0.20862685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98508817,0.0025835114,0.00050450524,0.008476022,0.00021962212,0.000042043925,0.00000675853,0.000012506371,0.0030669016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98903507,0.0073287315,0.00026493252,0.00042853423,0.0013537889,0.001588904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880884,0.0066630226,0.0017792222,0.00044461363,0.00054531445,0.0024793379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009124448,0.00040108894,0.0004679051,0.00201256,0.012100875,0.012776082,0.0015862377,0.0038610648,0.00241127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015283258,0.00029937134,0.00033756933,0.0009925673,0.039358024,0.010052012,0.015005308,0.0078789275,0.00015983875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025218464,0.00040706675,0.014197295,0.0001800428,0.000026555908,0.000926208,0.5651927,0.00013675711,0.00021150331,0.32184556,0.013880413,0.08297069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033274493,0.00013495192,0.020139521,0.001145505,0.000026120437,0.00162152,0.6353145,0.00042537967,0.0003841765,0.19825283,0.14246212,0.000060110215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058032307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073733707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012776082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072699054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008738711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05274707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553331921","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4683","title":"MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE:  RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND DECISION-MAKING BY ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Volition (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Individualism; Political science","score_opus":0.04227486848726325,"score_gpt":0.3394451055679871,"score_spread":0.2971702370807239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553331921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98478967,0.0015705526,0.00026712587,0.0045455093,0.00001713597,0.000015440748,0.000027982203,0.0000023529547,0.008764197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984479,0.0006325468,0.00012503481,0.0002945682,0.000007740148,0.000012093592,0.000009054383,0.0000011460355,0.00046976525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978655,0.0011823466,0.00012187266,0.00021589296,0.0002768485,0.00033753438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653244,0.00195104,0.0007440049,0.0001275586,0.00020433479,0.00044059817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024005577,0.00019781417,0.00026221882,0.00072452123,0.0040393723,0.003476679,0.0005398037,0.00087873207,0.0015296246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072213844,0.00015231816,0.00023232614,0.0006783844,0.0067285416,0.003703095,0.004096969,0.0016761124,0.000081316146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016182248,0.000043942084,0.02813883,0.000037363505,0.000003995274,0.00063713704,0.9541453,0.000024979512,0.00017182624,0.0053560655,0.0004741646,0.010950267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004810225,0.000029336157,0.032411132,0.00010901721,0.000006444261,0.00063616445,0.9575172,0.000059663627,0.000104275045,0.0021297047,0.006980562,0.000011704961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036714476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05633912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036714476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032818974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032437334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073001504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556416876","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4679","title":"THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN CANADIAN AND AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Convention; Humanities; Legislation; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06365415592707724,"score_gpt":0.36271423619255044,"score_spread":0.2990600802654732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556416876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041677686,0.025289504,0.0046603316,0.056015052,0.0039004385,0.00023659205,0.0010160749,0.00009157032,0.9046226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27412143,0.052881487,0.032028995,0.0549746,0.0019908557,0.00070892985,0.001685359,0.00033646607,0.5812718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862975,0.0018461278,0.0004592477,0.0009015066,0.007910106,0.0025854348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994472,0.001391024,0.00019774058,0.00034396455,0.0025978594,0.0009973235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008376614,0.00090012455,0.0007414108,0.0039545996,0.018627921,0.012154135,0.002569152,0.0058718678,0.0077369767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011347043,0.00037706757,0.0005305798,0.006194745,0.015551941,0.0030555455,0.0037990601,0.008375434,0.001161878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072561434,0.000014904352,0.00031242223,0.000044604603,0.000003364709,0.000095917436,0.0048755114,0.00014713168,0.00012906056,0.88717353,0.08557875,0.021617576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028877212,0.0000048812976,0.0009991173,0.00020225154,0.000005602474,0.000045644614,0.0011075085,0.00007948008,0.000054012264,0.021366902,0.97610056,0.00003122909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9688987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07964484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07964484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21342134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57786644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558991063","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4708","title":"THE POLICING OF MAJOR EVENTS IN CANADA: LESSONS FROM TORONTO’S G20 AND VANCOUVER’S OLYMPICS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sport and Mega-Event Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Political science; Order (exchange); Common law; Civil liberties; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.06619481335247833,"score_gpt":0.3547506923968958,"score_spread":0.28855587904441743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558991063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77885973,0.011294449,0.0015155954,0.07266465,0.00080151943,0.00040747898,0.002372364,0.000112837995,0.13197133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96648127,0.006567319,0.001152857,0.0038793953,0.00008038485,0.000051868745,0.00090172753,0.00006909961,0.020816028],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958579,0.00057961943,0.00009073668,0.00025993751,0.0011106761,0.0021010975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922969,0.000743136,0.00034669027,0.00017412941,0.0034133922,0.003025751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020324953,0.00076252787,0.0006368181,0.0024172924,0.032527413,0.008576532,0.0033305413,0.0019480833,0.003999184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005118035,0.0007537234,0.0005372787,0.006024555,0.008127133,0.0019264945,0.0040833163,0.0041214232,0.0004600057],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042999507,0.0005369431,0.23716433,0.0009489551,0.00025207846,0.004900637,0.31289956,0.003695101,0.0009980204,0.04960387,0.19598159,0.19258898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045588862,0.00010276107,0.25271526,0.0006782661,0.00007344864,0.00023949446,0.57153994,0.0013213174,0.00035594622,0.002477906,0.17029779,0.00015229583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23349623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23349623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2899389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8890357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561962885","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4553","title":"Marian Roberts, Developing the Craft of Mediation: Reflections on Theory and Practice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Mediation; Field (mathematics); Focus (optics); Sociology; Psychology; Visual arts; Art; Social science; Optics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11279146684816836,"score_gpt":0.4065831191398667,"score_spread":0.29379165229169835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561962885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033763514,0.22489378,0.014736634,0.664969,0.0036663825,0.00016320577,0.00009102535,0.000110424335,0.08799318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2131644,0.35366943,0.06034274,0.2712056,0.0025853852,0.0014833069,0.000113657894,0.0005984805,0.09683701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98675805,0.009934336,0.00035192442,0.0007625154,0.0016282648,0.0005649337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98082376,0.016545646,0.000499731,0.00039158593,0.0010455903,0.00069364504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018655865,0.0009630416,0.0008811929,0.001738895,0.009279886,0.009032597,0.004144045,0.011118773,0.0049112258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024364216,0.0011687179,0.00076635886,0.002189768,0.031334475,0.023817422,0.0055969455,0.019606343,0.0019686813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054436914,0.00010147194,0.0004853652,0.00077026605,0.000021266793,0.0005832772,0.07590601,0.00046867738,0.00023147042,0.56273884,0.3056621,0.052976772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041032697,0.00004864359,0.000706137,0.0026895816,0.000016975358,0.00052043394,0.034832273,0.00023639502,0.0005974742,0.2394739,0.7207648,0.00007243824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030732019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037354227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030732019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006511552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011937807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09866285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580019413","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4570","title":"Richard A. Falk, The Costs of War: International Law, The UN and World Order","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; Plea; Normative; Law; Order (exchange); Context (archaeology); Political science; International law; International relations; Ideology; Politics; Use of force; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Economics","score_opus":0.020230781012140688,"score_gpt":0.3217711641448161,"score_spread":0.3015403831326754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580019413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023964285,0.3262527,0.00095177855,0.6119942,0.0040878104,0.000022695409,0.0001289025,0.000035211997,0.054130167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16224143,0.40968335,0.0036786483,0.27104157,0.013588165,0.0001540216,0.00021410821,0.00015034001,0.1392484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856514,0.0007153255,0.000067285924,0.00011209044,0.0004167921,0.00012348425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773216,0.0015592544,0.00020516927,0.00006706011,0.00025889173,0.00017739131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015281556,0.0007316529,0.00042867957,0.0014319147,0.004483089,0.006772432,0.0015652014,0.0079424,0.004911165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041017304,0.0004541239,0.0003120572,0.0022583394,0.007819998,0.013556028,0.0016135321,0.0076860357,0.0011889102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021672524,0.00003123425,0.0005851297,0.00017393423,0.000011293819,0.0001278644,0.0038424921,0.00017659648,0.00007926451,0.1900362,0.787602,0.017312348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021057187,0.000014269993,0.0025506222,0.0008188389,0.000010363865,0.00024967914,0.0077424445,0.0002138425,0.00023638851,0.16177331,0.8263178,0.000051370927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041635558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11564672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041635558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047273166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003967816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08278644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586153411","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4487","title":"Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’Im, Islam and Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari’a","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Politics; Orientalism; Religious studies; State (computer science); Christianity; Subject (documents); Secular state; Negotiation; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03776179481296774,"score_gpt":0.2991788014757872,"score_spread":0.2614170066628194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586153411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22806247,0.05783791,0.0026897728,0.16550024,0.0017776311,0.000081986,0.00012127924,0.000032150452,0.5438966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958372,0.013979427,0.0010244703,0.0065006777,0.0002156968,0.000027165157,0.000025368498,0.000014505711,0.019840661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932766,0.0003767673,0.00002214682,0.000038826944,0.00011394625,0.00012076132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950385,0.00024470812,0.00008011104,0.000018545945,0.00009226433,0.000060597467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020522752,0.000324602,0.00016596312,0.0005341707,0.009646044,0.004503016,0.0005609716,0.0024212732,0.0050402535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010814304,0.00022953951,0.0001744623,0.0007433029,0.007310577,0.005560375,0.0021064447,0.002464254,0.00061491196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011283015,0.0000837883,0.003554829,0.0002409689,0.000015362535,0.0012564212,0.14604412,0.000302536,0.00081887277,0.78760946,0.027138771,0.032822046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056457444,0.000097930395,0.0120897,0.0010876248,0.000035682933,0.0014002266,0.28781158,0.0010596119,0.0013259894,0.13795546,0.5569981,0.00008163769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015124697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043904264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015124697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004766361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039849035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034582496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586862425","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4569","title":"Peter Fitzpatrick, Law as Resistance: Modernism, Imperialism, Legalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Resistance (ecology); Modernism (music); Law; Product (mathematics); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Art history; Art; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.03222374480642907,"score_gpt":0.34539891031431935,"score_spread":0.31317516550789026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586862425","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028960076,0.51286167,0.0017445061,0.32388267,0.0029402208,0.000033819586,0.000120436125,0.00004875805,0.155472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18047647,0.5438681,0.0030157848,0.068540886,0.01100187,0.0001998756,0.0001649121,0.00013485739,0.19259723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992539,0.0002960595,0.000036731057,0.000093574905,0.00024363899,0.000076089134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986047,0.0009682186,0.00013623374,0.000053194337,0.00013303779,0.000104640676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010025469,0.00054000487,0.00033583082,0.0014295963,0.0033814027,0.004763785,0.0009831673,0.0038091394,0.006454306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030206535,0.00043010607,0.00023833303,0.0022038019,0.009198747,0.01122439,0.0015335951,0.0044526136,0.0015736672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028119588,0.00003808588,0.00040747353,0.00027639937,0.0000137006555,0.00018766902,0.0060532885,0.00013141088,0.00015092346,0.47263843,0.48896345,0.031110898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018976078,0.00001444227,0.0025078256,0.0006305103,0.000009421401,0.000242822,0.0058412347,0.0001325892,0.00021886257,0.27435553,0.7160037,0.0000240527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012365951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024929872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012365951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026589863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022063442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02458793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587580689","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4374","title":"‘A FORUM FOR DISCUSSION’ AND A PLACE OF RESPITE: JEWISH LAWYERS AND TORONTO’S READING LAW CLUB","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Club; Political science; Humanities; Reading (process); Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art; History; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024508037153454603,"score_gpt":0.3098396618121854,"score_spread":0.2853316246587308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587580689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24271552,0.022206722,0.0008362807,0.31036067,0.004026297,0.00008195922,0.00019575979,0.000114752685,0.41946203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8745653,0.0033006484,0.00038800878,0.011756294,0.0005251862,0.00003056691,0.000057033674,0.00007222174,0.1093048],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951426,0.0017511984,0.000059904032,0.00021699767,0.0007291293,0.002100243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947513,0.0010847147,0.00033515683,0.00014900987,0.0005723038,0.0031075627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002836863,0.00033710222,0.00034890033,0.0017525745,0.061722063,0.013422628,0.002393766,0.005877139,0.013219114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005320415,0.00045586698,0.0002450978,0.002669067,0.037796672,0.0042184154,0.0095538795,0.0060058497,0.0007699784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000399935,0.000033358257,0.002917937,0.00011073871,0.000008874415,0.0024636441,0.70424134,0.000054242075,0.00033950803,0.13295314,0.13851623,0.01832099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010291998,0.0000129451055,0.00565495,0.000121128185,0.000004678196,0.00018500342,0.28888652,0.000031967105,0.00009048442,0.002059499,0.70291615,0.000026493726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9303432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11172417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11172417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073772185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81061935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587705529","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4509","title":"John Reilly, Bad Medicine: A Judge’s Struggle for Justice in a First Nations Community","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Jargon; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Business","score_opus":0.039941859694052236,"score_gpt":0.33230249773720716,"score_spread":0.29236063804315493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587705529","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002534562,0.14143212,0.00043934022,0.66486424,0.011742743,0.00003327716,0.00009951053,0.000063862084,0.17879036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11695645,0.08849626,0.001072624,0.29940063,0.00580807,0.00008442045,0.00012710447,0.0002135943,0.48784086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763584,0.0005497325,0.00007308951,0.00014534601,0.0010697022,0.0005261898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972556,0.0007910471,0.00012205979,0.00007952944,0.00079690135,0.0009548026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016857963,0.0005118689,0.00038417394,0.00129146,0.019887727,0.009944918,0.0015621709,0.008766337,0.009872916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007193556,0.00043221802,0.00028481297,0.0017112007,0.010649842,0.0073820413,0.0023257579,0.012192098,0.001694104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005033732,0.000007377666,0.00018468701,0.000040029186,0.0000027856763,0.00013305957,0.004640884,0.000025006162,0.00003155918,0.050958417,0.93379444,0.010176612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038316875,0.0000034852796,0.00062140194,0.0002709159,0.0000045349066,0.00012888505,0.008178412,0.000025094878,0.00005749004,0.01035348,0.980332,0.00002045514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60382503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8436992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39617497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015780725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03256736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79701626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588286494","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4816","title":"DRIVING THE GIFT HOME","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Narrative; Constitutionalism; Section (typography); Treaty; Politics; Sociology; Colonialism; History; Law; Political science; Literature; Art; Democracy","score_opus":0.06954741630039481,"score_gpt":0.3789582868100378,"score_spread":0.309410870509643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588286494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05570994,0.0032364326,0.0050239316,0.13173209,0.0025147474,0.000075505006,0.00023277082,0.00026642525,0.80120826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72929114,0.0014254497,0.002033744,0.020356592,0.00018997342,0.00004725707,0.00009869604,0.0003018513,0.24625532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969014,0.00067196274,0.00002729767,0.00032543522,0.0005086885,0.0015653026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977016,0.00031869678,0.00008079069,0.00017259066,0.00051776576,0.001208703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003156952,0.0004093237,0.00031287043,0.0010564091,0.03560478,0.01410635,0.0015620845,0.0044677076,0.032893248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006281985,0.0002563743,0.00035084374,0.001073542,0.0336061,0.0077407043,0.011890038,0.0057547954,0.0035704258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021004444,0.000017364639,0.0010515356,0.000029339755,0.00000268257,0.00032509275,0.050076533,0.00006609704,0.0001261154,0.8458724,0.08418779,0.018223982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010003812,0.00000927816,0.0008721442,0.0001235877,0.0000037408122,0.000112350855,0.062311657,0.00012148127,0.00013809917,0.045481976,0.89079744,0.000018248249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67761356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8122566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32238644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039105814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0448255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64857006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588847849","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4376","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 225 RE-EVALUATING INDEPENDENCE: THE EMERGING PROBLEM OF CROWN-POLICE ALIGNMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Plea; Windsor; Warrant; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.15238276535311923,"score_gpt":0.44048746539275985,"score_spread":0.2881047000396406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588847849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019390954,0.006500349,0.0020036264,0.06423252,0.0017379228,0.000056624798,0.00045452532,0.00029723652,0.9053263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21032394,0.0037921173,0.0022347935,0.010948657,0.00083390623,0.000036670466,0.00026557196,0.00017856502,0.7713856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789494,0.00040888716,0.000112918955,0.00027892087,0.0008567145,0.00044760428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800974,0.00035737915,0.00015540454,0.00025216158,0.000779943,0.0004454137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021350891,0.00026290902,0.0002075652,0.0009048596,0.0070486106,0.01079638,0.0006726374,0.0043481253,0.060335323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058405646,0.00037882238,0.00029832343,0.0010241659,0.004949277,0.0029056435,0.003009027,0.0023455792,0.008519649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033101136,0.000035460387,0.007914592,0.00011817278,0.000014439414,0.00062429754,0.0043786173,0.00020031445,0.00070507923,0.30775502,0.56508297,0.11313795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008049691,0.000017988881,0.013874957,0.0001815768,0.0000109275215,0.0001720834,0.0030687281,0.00026742704,0.00034155737,0.015334579,0.9666936,0.000028506483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3841008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6508229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3841008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009318936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01219438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76373017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590199685","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4555","title":"Rachel Murray, The Role of National Human Rights Institutions at the International and Regional Levels: The Experience of Africa; Brian Burdekin, assisted by Jason Naum, National Human Rights Institutions in the Asia-Pacific Region, The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Human rights; Constitution; Promotion (chess); Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.13252074511468057,"score_gpt":0.354440683926519,"score_spread":0.22191993881183844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590199685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023868636,0.30007666,0.0011856989,0.6299624,0.008186192,0.00009023621,0.00038986054,0.00015158877,0.057570428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055738658,0.34931302,0.0040842225,0.1751094,0.0042994358,0.0003630089,0.0004037092,0.0005508581,0.41013774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871314,0.0006208756,0.000040518313,0.0001411734,0.00032761402,0.00015666893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969086,0.0017165727,0.00019753192,0.00004905016,0.00051939505,0.0006087929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029618796,0.0011031753,0.0005509266,0.0014757111,0.007534113,0.0048942296,0.0021387476,0.0046811425,0.018360125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005063017,0.0007226748,0.00030906414,0.0022529564,0.0028120016,0.009452206,0.002490329,0.0061689042,0.005370665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008493577,0.000017800408,0.00023435679,0.00016829262,0.0000026475486,0.00011116241,0.0060522943,0.000031758875,0.000046093443,0.008042567,0.964328,0.020956539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009397547,0.000006933884,0.0009246731,0.0005530666,0.000005056815,0.00023665084,0.015795873,0.00003982378,0.00009666087,0.0040837866,0.9782306,0.000017535225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08676767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24848874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08676767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034315244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009011866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17252529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591022630","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4571","title":"Jane Kelsey, Serving Whose Interests? The Political Economy of Trade in Services Agreements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Politics; Trade in services; Political science; World trade; International trade; Economics; Law; Trade barrier","score_opus":0.028717323815710613,"score_gpt":0.33554652938629176,"score_spread":0.30682920557058113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591022630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029943087,0.036203388,0.0008531524,0.7417395,0.0022042964,0.000016885306,0.00008673391,0.000021934453,0.21587974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17263807,0.0715999,0.0016378502,0.28864115,0.002520459,0.00010559296,0.00015487819,0.00014764871,0.46255445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819094,0.00064457103,0.00004681675,0.00013637534,0.00066911866,0.00031226635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975567,0.0014147139,0.00015957121,0.00004717861,0.00047057262,0.00035128545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018714453,0.0002790039,0.00035632378,0.0009556627,0.009568351,0.007356122,0.0008990968,0.005874618,0.01063615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057324935,0.00040972017,0.00020816218,0.0022053153,0.0077580614,0.015876682,0.002655516,0.008233676,0.0016126996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007529651,0.000020575337,0.00025171123,0.00005312461,0.0000019037413,0.00008491377,0.004223089,0.000064873915,0.000042165415,0.3315647,0.6556188,0.0080666775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007379196,0.0000066475463,0.000920096,0.0003597743,0.000003290454,0.00012366417,0.010866155,0.00012763776,0.0000858268,0.10757161,0.8799103,0.000017625478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060282204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12243312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060282204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058328863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069456697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119862616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592714842","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4842","title":"RECONCILIATION IN TRANSLATION: INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS AND CANADA’S TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Mainstream; Sensibility; Law; Sociology; Political science; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.0643599226041288,"score_gpt":0.32993196547455506,"score_spread":0.26557204287042624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592714842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053530194,0.01686735,0.0059963684,0.43756363,0.003192975,0.000119675205,0.00024580193,0.00017509505,0.48230886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87632114,0.0060873213,0.005591415,0.030320203,0.00053498766,0.00007315911,0.00014479623,0.00018667054,0.080740295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822973,0.0054525863,0.0005633979,0.0010642568,0.0065127388,0.0041097766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785009,0.007693701,0.0007301372,0.0014922126,0.008908323,0.0026748425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016032418,0.00034247557,0.0004858238,0.0025538674,0.042930055,0.020670995,0.00247431,0.006198351,0.0061702523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030594513,0.0003505183,0.00047954926,0.005070998,0.034409076,0.007864561,0.009341166,0.009662265,0.00047439325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023434752,0.000019887699,0.0010006297,0.000106168976,0.000008072809,0.00066757586,0.14551437,0.00024268207,0.00014997392,0.74799806,0.06743421,0.03683493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001896648,0.000014424299,0.00370931,0.00062157004,0.000018170247,0.00025735868,0.09066053,0.00067178585,0.00049947837,0.08709192,0.81633717,0.000099388046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9584866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12374852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12374852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28367043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89786255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594467543","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4841","title":"BUILDING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES TO CLIMATE CHANGE, DISASTERS, AND DISPLACEMENT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; University of Windsor","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Vulnerability (computing); Climate change; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Disaster risk reduction; Hazard; Psychological intervention; Forced migration; Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Computer science; Computer security; Refugee; Law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.37581449620701735,"score_gpt":0.4016484913620534,"score_spread":0.025833995155036038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594467543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004932237,0.017911294,0.016391495,0.08488719,0.00244483,0.00010315804,0.00006785384,0.00010391121,0.8731581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59747356,0.10156066,0.062766775,0.043474272,0.002812958,0.0011222812,0.00046737038,0.00043204296,0.18989012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964324,0.0018238192,0.00020074041,0.0003351147,0.00056436437,0.0006435527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682343,0.001535399,0.00023474178,0.0004122517,0.00042216104,0.0005720763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008068309,0.0007867313,0.00050197606,0.0032330807,0.009061449,0.011576391,0.0018904606,0.0039298297,0.014059582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082236435,0.00032212527,0.00055644015,0.0027318802,0.02254535,0.017086968,0.01594264,0.0090554785,0.0012542062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023720518,0.000034306428,0.0003514945,0.00007600435,0.0000043939785,0.00007043654,0.0095947785,0.00035572058,0.000042950156,0.9423331,0.017162688,0.029971793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003278297,0.00002146308,0.00079940335,0.0008105585,0.000009970652,0.00010685412,0.023479553,0.0002018131,0.00011995889,0.36817053,0.6062582,0.000018501574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013299018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02836655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014059582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007068141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016365616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05128318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594620988","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4845","title":"WHO IS MY NEIGHBOUR? THE DUTY OF CARE IN THE IMMIGRATION CONTEXT: A PERSPECTIVE FROM CANADIAN CASE LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty of care; Immigration; Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Immigration law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Narrative; State (computer science); Power (physics); Sociology; History; Liability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04971966374203982,"score_gpt":0.35720547239973727,"score_spread":0.3074858086576974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594620988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09877256,0.03278498,0.0038149739,0.269834,0.0012617161,0.0001215526,0.00015274445,0.00003071321,0.59322673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202918,0.02235158,0.002359607,0.027751615,0.00031094666,0.00007675454,0.000062200066,0.00004246274,0.026753081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98820645,0.003176702,0.0002628342,0.000793742,0.0032690896,0.0042912546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994156,0.0031926518,0.00028993108,0.00013944811,0.0012594212,0.00096255034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008251072,0.0007929602,0.0008695679,0.004405324,0.058662303,0.016994491,0.0048492737,0.010638931,0.003574931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013206227,0.00055150164,0.0007541422,0.0068670097,0.05992312,0.006916731,0.0077914624,0.010473909,0.0003495962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007350922,0.000015335152,0.0011158988,0.00007557454,0.000004515881,0.0018089279,0.10675531,0.00017322923,0.00009017793,0.87146944,0.012952296,0.005532021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019521553,0.000021899932,0.006013262,0.0017015751,0.000043075164,0.0018602174,0.35942686,0.0007232349,0.0001811482,0.09883954,0.53100425,0.00016546859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98682934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21507125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21507125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16773172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9104061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594863900","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4371","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 103 A VIEW FROM WITHIN: RECONCEPTUALIZING MEDIATOR INTERACTIONS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Mediator; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Biology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.13406355741304943,"score_gpt":0.3989960962974119,"score_spread":0.26493253888436247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594863900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039561536,0.020068275,0.06518918,0.048128504,0.0016132018,0.0002460969,0.00017816007,0.00046396846,0.82455105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71600264,0.016234197,0.04376039,0.0047216997,0.00048530483,0.00037094762,0.00025789134,0.0003096627,0.21785729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542797,0.0031463131,0.00014372596,0.00034430192,0.00063915347,0.00029857268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986873,0.00048413756,0.00017339103,0.00027157879,0.00017891178,0.00020466222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046589095,0.00047115033,0.00032392345,0.0017602945,0.006201674,0.012940843,0.0010643217,0.0032406899,0.021132672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005025957,0.00039661338,0.00040412726,0.0012563799,0.015237333,0.012620243,0.007150134,0.002761932,0.0022226328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029415989,0.000038850067,0.0019455375,0.00017896408,0.000013023682,0.00069601316,0.102026604,0.00022489573,0.0006410711,0.7272728,0.04347875,0.12345411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012866603,0.000043168788,0.0028513134,0.00081276376,0.000015415691,0.0007798017,0.06319861,0.0005297579,0.0005011033,0.15567803,0.7755488,0.00002836556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012633238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022501169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021132672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050837547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058818855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07069588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595757146","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4379","title":"HOLLY CULLEN, THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE ELIMINATION OF CHILD LABOR (The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Law and economics; Economic history; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.027924301508131674,"score_gpt":0.31310035707679307,"score_spread":0.2851760555686614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595757146","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068345555,0.8432105,0.0008448886,0.062361762,0.0054766284,0.000050953284,0.00096258486,0.000044647808,0.086364545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029069116,0.71798676,0.002284412,0.040086515,0.005125414,0.00025533172,0.0007905581,0.00024449438,0.20415738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788755,0.00061613787,0.00018693517,0.00026213142,0.00071836996,0.00032891944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795616,0.0012385101,0.00020073434,0.00007964551,0.0003921006,0.00013287761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002610484,0.0013783396,0.0008205434,0.0027205131,0.0044260807,0.009761127,0.0029958908,0.010887615,0.023585707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005325707,0.0013489884,0.00065477117,0.006249679,0.0050160307,0.010620988,0.0027124032,0.0055567427,0.0074359886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027864831,0.00004806225,0.00031780524,0.0003817484,0.00001577194,0.00012173411,0.0022623064,0.00016272854,0.00006424274,0.096016854,0.8583187,0.042262204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013713737,0.000006108558,0.0019732309,0.0011578291,0.000012653003,0.00008766515,0.0015115093,0.000040397383,0.000109892986,0.019099025,0.97596586,0.000022168348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17107469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3697865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17107469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063383123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009208095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34015787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597031627","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4813","title":"STL’UL NUP: LEGAL LANDSCAPES OF THE HUL’QUMI’NUM MUSTIMUHW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Identity (music); Meaning (existential); Ethnology; Humanities; Relation (database); Law; Geography; Political science; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Ecology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05527603088047359,"score_gpt":0.36526010277526394,"score_spread":0.3099840718947904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597031627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6572092,0.012679214,0.0007955701,0.008814649,0.00020341737,0.000038978997,0.00013552819,0.000022124705,0.32010126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735078,0.002521898,0.0004400781,0.00025056346,0.000014589244,0.000015439276,0.00004034132,0.000008041171,0.02320124],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984777,0.00004579033,0.0000035568223,0.000012031966,0.000029228688,0.000061639774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998969,0.00003028876,0.0000138399355,0.0000074660143,0.0000132239675,0.000038294642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019330879,0.000114937095,0.00011377913,0.00041130884,0.0073968247,0.0027527667,0.00033502225,0.00049981364,0.0040398114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030731998,0.00014540777,0.000047528203,0.000903232,0.0050231535,0.001442271,0.0016116926,0.0007068632,0.00021319711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004157727,0.0000543174,0.02995339,0.0003064488,0.000007686673,0.0038063044,0.5539977,0.00025391678,0.0018066388,0.22088742,0.02762665,0.16125795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004578601,0.000029485887,0.08318258,0.00034786947,0.0000061663654,0.00156899,0.45855784,0.00023967274,0.00049239903,0.011805653,0.44374314,0.00002167367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18584399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4838097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18584399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053936695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040363194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36952454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597111891","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4817","title":"STSQEY’ULÉCW RE ST'EXELCEMC (ST’EXELEMC LAWS FROM THE LAND)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Kinship; Sociology; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.050943558763418245,"score_gpt":0.36630685130774565,"score_spread":0.3153632925443274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597111891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023532754,0.00483372,0.00073305896,0.02566177,0.003994427,0.000068725196,0.0003961672,0.00020878874,0.94057065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07688735,0.00161767,0.00042210633,0.0037388557,0.00031232458,0.00004677875,0.00017962304,0.00013921793,0.91665614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992606,0.00010384284,0.000020093528,0.00010108292,0.00031469087,0.00019963921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994449,0.000102000675,0.000037446556,0.00004223299,0.00020260316,0.00017075743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054954493,0.00026228934,0.00014639973,0.0003098622,0.003954868,0.004570585,0.0004491861,0.0016324073,0.14533783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019603036,0.00019929386,0.000119709024,0.0003233005,0.0018662999,0.0025306793,0.0026185738,0.00277363,0.01551663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004613585,0.000056184956,0.0025245224,0.00018034104,0.0000055581327,0.0018778192,0.010991127,0.000094485506,0.0011964071,0.16161413,0.7388066,0.08260673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011935745,0.000006199004,0.0009687617,0.000058924386,6.664513e-7,0.00013857159,0.0014407922,0.000015463576,0.00030244022,0.0007707601,0.99629277,0.0000034218092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038310446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08705625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14533783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031766181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036898893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4862035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597833929","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4370","title":"SCORCHED EARTH: THE USE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS TO STIFLE COMPETITION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Covenant; Humanities; Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Political science; Business; Welfare economics; Economics; Art; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.20526493107737948,"score_gpt":0.393474131765862,"score_spread":0.18820920068848251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597833929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17962825,0.0012263183,0.023122301,0.013058985,0.0002510119,0.00016581226,0.00006206821,0.00020714143,0.78227806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96607333,0.00032050503,0.00232296,0.0028596546,0.00003323535,0.000053581487,0.000026977172,0.00006011106,0.028249655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800019,0.007322333,0.00072720245,0.0016828552,0.00612987,0.0041357568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850712,0.008182788,0.0012455689,0.0023273109,0.0021122554,0.0010609055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012107964,0.00042126235,0.00047761205,0.0019745193,0.018912567,0.013504246,0.0029208795,0.005899589,0.0064329742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02834331,0.0005289743,0.000476858,0.0024156212,0.046397544,0.0072071366,0.009408446,0.007552854,0.00066488626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016532393,0.000026704167,0.0028129015,0.000037523114,0.000009561119,0.0004576891,0.03609714,0.000330213,0.0005993672,0.9416611,0.0058014025,0.012149909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057054403,0.00023098795,0.02288674,0.0014860415,0.0001282251,0.0010832369,0.16948754,0.004192178,0.003322495,0.23691668,0.55988944,0.00031936218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30927756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4620224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30927756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015791629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6149547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599494580","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4808","title":"LEARNING FROM BEAR-WALKER: INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS AND INTERCULTURAL LEGAL EDUCATION IN CANADIAN LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal profession; Law; Legal education; Political science; Viewpoints; Legal research; Sociology; Empowerment; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03796338000169707,"score_gpt":0.3857957892049488,"score_spread":0.3478324092032517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599494580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.678115,0.0017736765,0.0018920125,0.053959507,0.00023255344,0.00016381993,0.000062390434,0.000089814384,0.26371118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96449715,0.0010896462,0.0014860363,0.0020237693,0.000016256618,0.000023828574,0.000023439019,0.000020580654,0.030819314],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958295,0.001000959,0.000056121437,0.00033263137,0.0011861826,0.0015945764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996253,0.0007519347,0.00024617973,0.000108204,0.00082961435,0.0018110769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004245339,0.00037038888,0.00030097284,0.0021703711,0.051706437,0.00891726,0.0021572495,0.0023026173,0.009642933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007107811,0.0003587298,0.00027725907,0.0020772042,0.017608274,0.0045148586,0.008146846,0.004348815,0.00039700302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019443829,0.00024780838,0.012749277,0.00010180922,0.000005603648,0.00072122674,0.8028514,0.00026215796,0.000614257,0.07128878,0.018455993,0.092682205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006898807,0.00004500424,0.018559705,0.00022924674,0.0000120899795,0.00012524112,0.79772353,0.00027207087,0.00039902513,0.005534785,0.17704438,0.000048064874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9809629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9073747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09262533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18021357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6720469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600341827","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4852","title":"THE IDEA OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE: REFLECTIONS ON NEW ZEALAND’S ACCIDENT COMPENSATION (OR PERSONAL INJURY) SYSTEM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; CLARITY; Law; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17549995626458265,"score_gpt":0.45649297266376465,"score_spread":0.280993016399182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600341827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3998448,0.010170281,0.004664483,0.19434883,0.00069065334,0.00025153602,0.000119309545,0.000029434377,0.38988066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96874726,0.00211775,0.00080507156,0.004958287,0.00010970602,0.00008008426,0.000017371329,0.000016470794,0.023147987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331784,0.0021062463,0.0003916979,0.000681932,0.0016383498,0.0018638921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956215,0.00215229,0.00051478145,0.0002699144,0.0006936198,0.00074794615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069641024,0.00032521406,0.0005798919,0.0017264163,0.014884197,0.011673382,0.0021472035,0.00517932,0.0070998967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011319025,0.0005387926,0.0005608313,0.0014297972,0.044606864,0.010671735,0.012218919,0.008134729,0.0002482185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055140627,0.000056777157,0.0035267458,0.00027244305,0.000017495708,0.002043965,0.3365983,0.0004412685,0.0009902609,0.63663137,0.005162965,0.01420321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094386305,0.00018640127,0.03866312,0.001060727,0.000050893854,0.0013016663,0.36127067,0.0011277316,0.0005397539,0.15699539,0.43845314,0.00025613792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7107591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05898068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028554915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61588585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602033633","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4368","title":"JUDGING SELECTION: APPOINTING CANADIAN JUDGES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Political science; Humanities; Commission; Law; Art","score_opus":0.09361937532165128,"score_gpt":0.4106273228878456,"score_spread":0.3170079475661943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602033633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08620555,0.01876802,0.017362809,0.14276935,0.0066325907,0.00082634063,0.0005697496,0.00038067315,0.72648495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7242582,0.015547585,0.025188679,0.0145832235,0.0012031525,0.00023012153,0.00050900073,0.0002604046,0.21821967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761755,0.005314003,0.0006244207,0.0019970734,0.0085692825,0.0073196986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97230196,0.0041742916,0.00087473536,0.0008116556,0.014984395,0.00685297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022406852,0.000466335,0.00052342634,0.004343413,0.033382107,0.012073595,0.003321359,0.0034048187,0.008432539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04370461,0.0007756759,0.0003765307,0.005816903,0.011944682,0.0026987419,0.0045627733,0.0048379404,0.0015470344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119429715,0.0000645601,0.023408627,0.00036575997,0.000027227476,0.001073072,0.043769017,0.0016606748,0.0013309079,0.23431222,0.416421,0.27744755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000313483,0.00004253415,0.018769482,0.00042394115,0.000024618943,0.00014885004,0.022863902,0.001033914,0.00054371014,0.014292399,0.94167656,0.00014873157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9780386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99377257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8821737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11782627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2774083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85489345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602182565","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4811","title":"WANISKĀ: REIMAGINING THE FUTURE WITH INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Narrative; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Commission; Political science; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05045419123617117,"score_gpt":0.3497937817313528,"score_spread":0.2993395904951816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602182565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26480848,0.022739604,0.007455953,0.19194546,0.0015218375,0.000099175675,0.00018990452,0.00013350586,0.5111061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469123,0.0052813864,0.0025320414,0.004634698,0.000074416464,0.000029119683,0.00004953935,0.000061877436,0.040424667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630547,0.0015345783,0.000060502145,0.00023974747,0.0007560068,0.0011037758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662626,0.0009708496,0.00020359516,0.00023941493,0.0008424585,0.0011174432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048665097,0.00035110724,0.00036049364,0.0013009598,0.040374104,0.015620896,0.0018234435,0.0022791883,0.0051568435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005705907,0.00020487246,0.00027124537,0.0016044611,0.034629166,0.009147066,0.007917177,0.004785156,0.00031286568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013079403,0.000013386291,0.0016318366,0.000060857048,0.00000446404,0.0005737509,0.6189724,0.000121839694,0.00021576314,0.34262583,0.015371296,0.020395406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024322396,0.000008958848,0.0013177035,0.00035338325,0.000008568573,0.00027791702,0.4944163,0.00024859433,0.00024117474,0.035483126,0.46761402,0.000027727041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8947969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9447436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8947969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07063504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110926114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5124955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602983245","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4810","title":"DECOLONIZING AND INDIGENIZING: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10028188575883995,"score_gpt":0.3877295488309621,"score_spread":0.28744766307212216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602983245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009808677,0.009705669,0.001593604,0.93707824,0.0011121007,0.000044526932,0.00001448016,0.00004059764,0.040602174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5396914,0.015272255,0.00782074,0.39041677,0.001884873,0.0003156574,0.000048341273,0.00015614013,0.044393864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97992676,0.009714059,0.000600248,0.000929591,0.003079839,0.0057495884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98029685,0.008718337,0.00082881196,0.00084044837,0.004091273,0.005224346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016383072,0.0005322024,0.00088524004,0.00176256,0.031842895,0.023108825,0.005396443,0.02320616,0.005770956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021173742,0.00049451535,0.0010143777,0.001721554,0.07293083,0.019234622,0.0136641795,0.026865829,0.0006214935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012843935,0.00009407553,0.0016068438,0.00019588445,0.0000053674207,0.0004636123,0.052148666,0.0001498509,0.00017378962,0.8847041,0.036806006,0.023638893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039903156,0.00010156108,0.003599752,0.0020762542,0.000022090146,0.0005996933,0.19727404,0.0003165763,0.00047245025,0.21999782,0.57540894,0.00009094054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3060815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50620747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3060815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033513594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09821521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6085998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603157990","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4846","title":"« PLACER LE CITOYEN AU CŒUR DU SYSTÈME » : ORIGINE ET FONDEMENTS D’UNE IDÉE POPULAIRE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Humanities; Political science; Civil society; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.06089158060743008,"score_gpt":0.38144957999142054,"score_spread":0.32055799938399043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603157990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11827059,0.018374482,0.018757505,0.122839294,0.0008577396,0.00003570418,0.000042232445,0.000081429236,0.7207411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647697,0.0031725373,0.0020435743,0.0026544046,0.00043725708,0.00004717389,0.000018377092,0.00010103584,0.026755871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153274,0.005182865,0.00011977218,0.00057918706,0.0014787458,0.0011066594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375075,0.0039816685,0.0004575664,0.0005710873,0.0007244725,0.00051440543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010009742,0.00039078377,0.0004803462,0.0026976408,0.018061727,0.023962097,0.0013177338,0.0054404875,0.0045129946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009879342,0.00045028425,0.00041478343,0.0035731767,0.06758109,0.013336086,0.0075538587,0.009014408,0.00050073926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051453385,0.0000032841378,0.00017568686,0.000010457373,0.0000011980093,0.000044906847,0.021961192,0.00003067037,0.00004369723,0.97459745,0.00092912285,0.002197044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002535772,0.000038569673,0.002183918,0.000395725,0.000010506649,0.000316933,0.041503396,0.00056438346,0.0005412921,0.40757322,0.54679525,0.000051489165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027643228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019152354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027643228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013071038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009566178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09483749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603315228","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4809","title":"LISTENING TO LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Active listening; Humanities; Identity (music); Sociology; Indigenous; Character (mathematics); Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08423744014614801,"score_gpt":0.39914969431920366,"score_spread":0.3149122541730557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603315228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032067113,0.01031215,0.0057176496,0.17363682,0.005820395,0.00010934602,0.00013497373,0.00024919256,0.7719524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52263796,0.010914475,0.0028774804,0.055395957,0.0015622418,0.00022609338,0.00013716136,0.00030397973,0.40594462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945287,0.0031802203,0.00010433011,0.00040466682,0.00093888864,0.0008431681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478745,0.0022355802,0.0002859535,0.00027267376,0.0008665104,0.0015518114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003768658,0.000525214,0.0003861847,0.0009220813,0.01927467,0.011287781,0.0014252756,0.004659405,0.025074476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016860787,0.00029565365,0.00037787686,0.00074979395,0.021187268,0.010909652,0.008375648,0.008715404,0.0064005726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000140101,0.000062806044,0.00065470306,0.00011054122,0.0000056683816,0.0014641805,0.5863264,0.000044539378,0.00065978675,0.13276781,0.23571806,0.042171456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026932116,0.000016272548,0.00036713603,0.00029913662,0.0000021707328,0.0005562802,0.22452511,0.000039065235,0.00014245018,0.011349113,0.76268756,0.000013114186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016461704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02025072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025074476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051196474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059924657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08388251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603352508","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4619","title":"Human Rights, The Rule of Law, and Development in Africa & Human Rights Under African Constitutions: Realizing the Promise for Ourselves","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Rule of law; Law; Law and economics; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11037749475392783,"score_gpt":0.3750578818539226,"score_spread":0.26468038709999475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603352508","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020615791,0.7805588,0.0019651896,0.07107812,0.0026577872,0.000032789067,0.00009002702,0.00005625087,0.14149943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.093609124,0.8005264,0.0043426114,0.0060574515,0.0028597552,0.0000988565,0.00017180594,0.00005025883,0.092283726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987458,0.0005908181,0.00004053633,0.00007756446,0.00037270493,0.00017266127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901474,0.00062448025,0.00009897325,0.000047531114,0.000100100966,0.000114119764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020524724,0.0008551585,0.00048466588,0.0017664623,0.0026707328,0.007298268,0.0006535047,0.0034150244,0.0072859623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021125437,0.00037165798,0.00025174182,0.003058215,0.008114006,0.010624937,0.0021429649,0.0037609194,0.0011720078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019610285,0.000040036124,0.00047606663,0.00046664014,0.000011578491,0.0002463619,0.0067577814,0.00043758363,0.00020209477,0.49781695,0.34540534,0.14811988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005989259,0.000009547726,0.0014705257,0.0012841023,0.0000062762765,0.00020716478,0.0074320096,0.00026393373,0.00023184785,0.18422987,0.80484056,0.000018079289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019976184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04838731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019976184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005363792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075494843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03971982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603518243","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4815","title":"DABAADENDIZIWIN: PRACTICES OF HUMILITY IN A MULTI-JURIDICAL LEGAL LANDSCAPE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Canada Council for the Arts; University of Victoria; Michigan State University","keywords":"Humility; Charter; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Pride; Navajo; Harmony (color); Indigenous; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.12770891809004695,"score_gpt":0.4497432287293902,"score_spread":0.3220343106393433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603518243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40651828,0.0049823346,0.008245283,0.036868162,0.0005304312,0.00010035733,0.000048751455,0.00017842732,0.542528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97330135,0.00045917145,0.0013886713,0.00093426614,0.000023420234,0.000021630658,0.000009842563,0.000040487266,0.023821209],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938472,0.003442921,0.0000892674,0.00038682082,0.0008816227,0.001352272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958819,0.0017547447,0.00030188708,0.0003065923,0.00066400756,0.001090837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005179381,0.0003115771,0.0002597247,0.0018381019,0.04656804,0.01297358,0.0014338891,0.0020522,0.0053739343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074551483,0.00033978347,0.000190922,0.0019272491,0.038011923,0.004321287,0.0094201015,0.0034723172,0.00040928097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023049495,0.000027084478,0.0028491144,0.000039413844,0.00000421172,0.0007540378,0.7135239,0.000115511015,0.0005508082,0.24594995,0.00953125,0.026631694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007558593,0.000024093659,0.005789851,0.00021224018,0.000007256505,0.00043506184,0.6370164,0.00032554555,0.0003872551,0.022218825,0.33352676,0.000049114326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39510602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6819113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39510602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026971346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021112973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78561246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603976016","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4843","title":"BEING THE CHANGE: SOCIAL JUSTICE IN EXTERNSHIP PROGRAM EVALUATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Public relations; Narrative; Sociology; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Pedagogy; Social science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.3521164757445121,"score_gpt":0.5410518283749198,"score_spread":0.18893535263040773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603976016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5997239,0.006829194,0.040048227,0.1052916,0.002822332,0.0118968105,0.0003497517,0.00023587426,0.23280235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96730745,0.0006500099,0.015360055,0.00570157,0.0002013799,0.0072725,0.000068490255,0.00006068502,0.00337797],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.61495066,0.34750858,0.008465899,0.003553319,0.016802805,0.008718773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67444056,0.25669798,0.015933054,0.011009009,0.025087448,0.016831992],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.30266765,0.00055585755,0.0011495409,0.003364973,0.012946905,0.01764653,0.002581389,0.00341179,0.0069309045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32165948,0.0006208985,0.0012674315,0.0029748727,0.017239844,0.012155497,0.02169629,0.006003954,0.00052676094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017032715,0.005193327,0.057694685,0.0029345897,0.00032350028,0.0008424644,0.22445138,0.001372918,0.00055771397,0.20353736,0.031007636,0.47038126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019622175,0.00982162,0.08755717,0.01701468,0.00080386497,0.0009583375,0.49726465,0.008116235,0.004594174,0.19221814,0.17927024,0.00041867048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050558588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019809121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30266765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021704795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039585736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8599349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604092280","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4806","title":"FOREWORD BY GUEST EDITOR: INDIGENOUS LAW, LANDS, AND LITERATURE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.01924456307684295,"score_gpt":0.3286395495800958,"score_spread":0.3093949865032528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604092280","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045731478,0.009242234,0.000045487464,0.14750762,0.8387373,0.00001282086,0.000057181194,0.000020492678,0.0043310765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009689966,0.007918988,0.0000943879,0.09901679,0.8523668,0.00004132706,0.000046627243,0.000063312065,0.039482746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774337,0.00044160246,0.0002822689,0.00032396195,0.0009433942,0.00026537685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98485744,0.005573377,0.0008980668,0.00048293415,0.006205324,0.0019829816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00388697,0.0018952643,0.0022930608,0.003752304,0.0053176675,0.009134269,0.0033884337,0.01200765,0.030703647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019365074,0.000787287,0.00091400347,0.0026196176,0.0029060359,0.007260464,0.004189509,0.017195387,0.016160848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032262058,0.00000315047,0.000013592151,0.00005386315,0.0000012219153,0.000025325595,0.00003326346,0.0000030678136,0.000008105956,0.00040539488,0.99775994,0.0016897245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061220694,0.0000054969432,0.00020095281,0.00043959366,0.000006134629,0.00009116852,0.00028842152,0.000019420842,0.000025715384,0.0005833714,0.9983261,0.0000073948936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00651066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017458934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003152476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045110025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10271388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604349924","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4814","title":"ALWAYS COMING HOME: METIS LEGAL UNDERSTANDINGS OF COMMUNITY AND TERRITORY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Metis; Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.07419447407246947,"score_gpt":0.37353256359121134,"score_spread":0.29933808951874186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604349924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22229938,0.0046318285,0.0040074396,0.11915776,0.0004543894,0.000054431042,0.000051652565,0.00003467283,0.6493084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638669,0.0007772041,0.00038652983,0.004007996,0.000044141954,0.00002268178,0.000013561655,0.000018013781,0.030863028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943241,0.002391997,0.000106844294,0.00036736223,0.0011461156,0.0016636307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735343,0.0010211042,0.00025863157,0.00013286856,0.0005679266,0.00066608045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032018167,0.00031272433,0.0004225232,0.0014365762,0.045218464,0.012444072,0.0022836875,0.0037017285,0.003577823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049373247,0.00024148822,0.00023539446,0.0017457079,0.07493041,0.006940962,0.008821663,0.0074000363,0.00029486264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039099878,0.000006256586,0.000923583,0.000012945527,0.0000014115922,0.0006291689,0.47367072,0.000051258154,0.000067936984,0.5150921,0.0057033133,0.0038374388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034890038,0.000007184092,0.0030626177,0.00018387477,0.0000046875143,0.00058057666,0.7881478,0.00021289039,0.00013742772,0.060405083,0.14723289,0.000021446876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72032505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81387466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27967495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03777524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028380657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.562644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605232142","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4807","title":"OUTSIDER EDUCATION: INDIGENOUS LAW AND LAND-BASED LEARNING","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Political science; Indigenous education; Humanities; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Ethnology; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07382627404369328,"score_gpt":0.43296131928994275,"score_spread":0.35913504524624945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605232142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27610677,0.004769913,0.0028954777,0.017856935,0.0003349011,0.00005593195,0.00002173729,0.00009581269,0.6978625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9191283,0.0033234372,0.0021329902,0.0015018048,0.00008959086,0.000026389625,0.00002397794,0.00004668374,0.073726915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976494,0.00097041397,0.0000313953,0.00020110444,0.0005503259,0.00059747964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874204,0.0003914734,0.00009233435,0.00008834433,0.00010617741,0.0005796114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022067493,0.00025603425,0.00029445055,0.0009645302,0.01219419,0.008573249,0.0013745793,0.0012034492,0.010378133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023133208,0.00013504246,0.00024016612,0.0010484502,0.014598291,0.003879135,0.008256708,0.0024148168,0.0005150199],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001702731,0.00042475702,0.0052322564,0.00019643402,0.000008008666,0.0012781932,0.5962339,0.0001768509,0.0010239846,0.19384073,0.013006919,0.18856089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005827241,0.00008912881,0.013613891,0.0006185666,0.000014900503,0.0006965404,0.49817455,0.0002564403,0.0005580146,0.023320181,0.4626177,0.000034182358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20440611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4692191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20440611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010945883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015597589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4064327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605377410","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4377","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 247 SO LONG AS YOU HAVE YOUR HEALTH: HEALTH CARE DISTRIBUTION IN CANADA AND PROCEDURALIST HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Right to health; Health care; Political science; Accountability; Scrutiny; Health policy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.061469129960931956,"score_gpt":0.3651926480706275,"score_spread":0.30372351810969556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605377410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008473217,0.01843912,0.00094240945,0.060555927,0.0010685582,0.00006899008,0.0011520826,0.00011947401,0.90918016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06555914,0.0077094696,0.0007252644,0.005008249,0.0002040424,0.00003028126,0.00041052696,0.000063308325,0.9202897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986278,0.00012091048,0.000038952494,0.000120488156,0.00062867225,0.0004632825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903774,0.000074457006,0.000044568733,0.000067892026,0.00039124457,0.00038412097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008637366,0.00032514555,0.00017224015,0.0010006407,0.0062302374,0.008182185,0.00061327196,0.0027085133,0.052180354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018012079,0.00031346342,0.0002476299,0.002148349,0.004280549,0.0024095753,0.0021651646,0.0019151105,0.0044100755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014588455,0.000017539132,0.0021411832,0.000064528314,0.0000044643757,0.00016685495,0.0015295001,0.00014622991,0.00017157684,0.31357846,0.6176562,0.06450887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024659034,0.0000036504182,0.003929753,0.0000922065,0.0000018600575,0.00006273197,0.0007107118,0.00007838042,0.000057181605,0.004069347,0.9909803,0.000011406638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9515142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9789331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052180354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03786094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06933675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27470165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605740735","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4534","title":"La Réparation Individuelle en Application des Mécanismes Prévus par le Droit International Humanitaire","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Humanities; Political science; Compensation (psychology); International law; Ethnology; Normative; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01989668298460712,"score_gpt":0.33250628830877893,"score_spread":0.3126096053241718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605740735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099147595,0.010916193,0.035521485,0.030194305,0.0010552057,0.00012540753,0.00008718637,0.00015436942,0.8227982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8731877,0.004303845,0.013154528,0.0017670535,0.0005696804,0.000115392955,0.000069329035,0.000083469815,0.10674889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99108875,0.0042651235,0.0003094567,0.0008789267,0.002341463,0.0011163153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567163,0.0017190663,0.00065987784,0.0007246711,0.0008655838,0.00035906423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00975183,0.0004770085,0.00036288679,0.0015484844,0.00455649,0.009180846,0.0013363957,0.0027791602,0.007087967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012358708,0.00024622204,0.0003556464,0.0009249525,0.0136031015,0.006136289,0.0047053834,0.0040304214,0.0014347894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019928068,0.000026989583,0.001592703,0.00006474378,0.0000067677793,0.00031754936,0.014445879,0.00036235544,0.0006495074,0.9341832,0.0050949752,0.043235566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001783318,0.00009367829,0.005920687,0.00059507485,0.000015588084,0.0010401952,0.019722624,0.0009982123,0.0024823297,0.23619996,0.73283935,0.00007458101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009887643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011632094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009887643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051592314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057796766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051573217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605920309","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4375","title":"WARMING UP THE “CHILLING EFFECT”: A COMMENT ON THE MOTIVE CLAUSE DISCUSSIONS IN R V KHAWAJA (2010) AND R V KHAWAJA (2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Racial profiling; Terrorism; Constitutionality; Law; Declaration; Political science; Dignity; Enforcement; Suspect; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05492174816345212,"score_gpt":0.3292921061895553,"score_spread":0.27437035802610316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605920309","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026988278,0.0039110803,0.00050984,0.96588445,0.006879438,0.00004210519,0.00021814292,0.000079301586,0.019776829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012779314,0.0009617939,0.00036875025,0.97555566,0.0018164141,0.000040299346,0.000025392761,0.000052637006,0.008399627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792204,0.0042069852,0.0013885011,0.0033461459,0.006245125,0.0055927522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97543913,0.015479867,0.0010277012,0.00074191985,0.005640215,0.0016710853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018045172,0.0018326577,0.0016651992,0.0014457853,0.030773807,0.012509334,0.011919817,0.09948254,0.004524738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03231039,0.0017842785,0.0033564207,0.0022017886,0.030794272,0.008291276,0.0046214894,0.09118046,0.0017596103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048670834,0.0000274633,0.00062996487,0.00015929101,0.000025950032,0.0008735651,0.016110945,0.00016568272,0.00054524944,0.12712765,0.8500668,0.004218709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056359073,0.00003695054,0.0018426749,0.0005238662,0.00006288371,0.00030462226,0.010089864,0.0002557558,0.00086555234,0.012054119,0.9736259,0.0002814312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8039334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84700525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8039334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046169847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08036646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39444256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606278834","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4856","title":"BUSINESS DOMINANCE IN THE “PEOPLE’S COURT”: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY IN THE TORONTO SMALL CLAIMS COURT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plaintiff; Dominance (genetics); Humanities; Political science; Management; Law; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.08276705721119029,"score_gpt":0.32905351928698584,"score_spread":0.24628646207579555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606278834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98875684,0.00020002999,0.00014391566,0.00036920895,0.000006498846,0.000019252506,0.00010645987,0.0000025711904,0.010395189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975012,0.00016958971,0.00006581018,0.000049472786,0.0000075087046,0.000011630951,0.00011251758,0.000003419451,0.0020787832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993105,0.0013105852,0.00044027486,0.0005176144,0.003425506,0.0012009883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97428775,0.0064162794,0.008444149,0.0006859629,0.0046199504,0.0055458597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027614068,0.00021990683,0.0004433947,0.0042798705,0.0083661955,0.004939832,0.0010081505,0.0007919129,0.00513907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017506376,0.00036738883,0.00024192747,0.005271861,0.006224816,0.0025052347,0.004787223,0.0012744592,0.00038459187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015905313,0.00009867652,0.7411028,0.000106722444,0.00008694199,0.0024554906,0.22366066,0.00038569717,0.001143479,0.005834973,0.0030172134,0.021948261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005268823,0.00005844597,0.8284049,0.0000746419,0.000021198211,0.00031216358,0.1616648,0.00051110936,0.0002893814,0.0004547115,0.00816293,0.000040434334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6623525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83068305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3376475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021793185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010605196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67927194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606282477","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4554","title":"William A. Schabas, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal court; Law; Statute; Political science; Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; Criminal procedure; Philosophy; International law","score_opus":0.056709816511820436,"score_gpt":0.34749403647779126,"score_spread":0.2907842199659708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606282477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086057984,0.32684863,0.0073054964,0.057689346,0.016831527,0.00008471735,0.0005374768,0.00024822334,0.589594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024481941,0.3053986,0.008835923,0.033919323,0.0130724935,0.0001897742,0.00072976534,0.00047219524,0.61289996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994653,0.00012146675,0.00004548205,0.00007337209,0.00022844713,0.00006594567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938,0.0003780214,0.000035220848,0.000031595744,0.00012331129,0.000051745184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006398372,0.00088423054,0.0004411709,0.0025708827,0.002574,0.003810175,0.0008497965,0.0021018533,0.017695846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015948876,0.0006568115,0.0004568593,0.0026342547,0.003056532,0.0052587115,0.0009961848,0.005198319,0.008025265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005807336,0.000018391527,0.00013308226,0.00012616039,0.0000034452507,0.00005725942,0.0004981201,0.00015114664,0.00009245517,0.15404877,0.7967544,0.04811105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016277675,0.0000055065143,0.00024150588,0.00022061849,0.0000012046221,0.00007762731,0.0001537361,0.000054859123,0.00003171988,0.03938461,0.95982003,0.000006910274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008458143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024581322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017695846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025296418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003098754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0591985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606760109","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4552","title":"Janet E. Halley, Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Cliché; Adversary; Sentence; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.12226781706251012,"score_gpt":0.3483944986057968,"score_spread":0.2261266815432867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606760109","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071452814,0.055730946,0.0010619627,0.9123564,0.009592428,0.0000196924,0.00007807906,0.000035766017,0.020410156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043476246,0.06939365,0.0035480938,0.7731572,0.010161766,0.00018547974,0.00010691242,0.00030712693,0.09966356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968137,0.0015719496,0.00011411435,0.00031881122,0.0008853655,0.00029601916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993455,0.004278723,0.0004540127,0.00014674834,0.0009263678,0.00073907204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051559797,0.00059276726,0.0005778502,0.0008826173,0.007578127,0.0075328182,0.002843859,0.012028343,0.009507794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013105375,0.00058849604,0.0004580264,0.0016268665,0.013540942,0.019754319,0.0030832128,0.020756043,0.0028634623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013711163,0.000014911015,0.00012457451,0.0000903333,0.00000397837,0.0000773421,0.0054810145,0.000020727952,0.000057370624,0.08503118,0.90299726,0.0060876263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013834964,0.000013818034,0.0005803305,0.0005989001,0.0000056684494,0.0001920803,0.010835406,0.00004737335,0.00023273434,0.06298039,0.9244583,0.000041141055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030229175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069491595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030229175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037198123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045787995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060106456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607043875","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4559","title":"Antony Anghie, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; International law; Law; Political science; Politics; Globalization; Colonialism; Perspective (graphical); Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.029131074050017542,"score_gpt":0.34798133546881066,"score_spread":0.31885026141879313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607043875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005752015,0.20657335,0.0027097978,0.09723348,0.0023484023,0.000028828983,0.000059892365,0.000028643779,0.6852656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37359327,0.2560553,0.005286482,0.029594652,0.00731206,0.00019032958,0.00012674778,0.000118596174,0.32772258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990796,0.000376981,0.000030100797,0.00008579106,0.00029227562,0.00013518614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989838,0.0007085581,0.000081805476,0.000051745494,0.000100244215,0.000073834424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009455037,0.0003114372,0.00034924375,0.0009773793,0.0038027235,0.004996212,0.0005474352,0.00290587,0.0039107036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024085403,0.00033681068,0.00015841432,0.0016509498,0.010142019,0.008083275,0.0020542303,0.004854913,0.0010855901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007855641,0.000008757602,0.00013195687,0.000060520364,0.0000021356238,0.00007389498,0.0040332675,0.00009279333,0.000044083532,0.9091234,0.07671822,0.009703014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056492086,0.0000066455295,0.00046116163,0.00026397262,0.0000024087662,0.00012233722,0.0019480777,0.00007133091,0.000061124556,0.2881957,0.7088539,0.000007735601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069324477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012311311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069324477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025627948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026538433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018594444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607265275","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4558","title":"Laverne A. Jacobs & Justice Anne L. Mactavish, eds., Dialogue Between Court And Tribunals – Essays In Administrative Law And Justice (2001- 2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Administration of justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Administration (probate law); Administrative law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10415412601389791,"score_gpt":0.40192674316524135,"score_spread":0.29777261715134345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607265275","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041083808,0.83414006,0.0012919307,0.06394795,0.008400607,0.000026649834,0.00021084094,0.00008865555,0.09148246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0097725,0.82316387,0.0019838756,0.009511407,0.0047472348,0.000047610174,0.00023570712,0.00010075105,0.15043704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987662,0.00029372168,0.00006781605,0.000119140575,0.0006521613,0.00010103868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807835,0.00097641716,0.00012995747,0.000053570613,0.00050857733,0.00025322798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020311223,0.0013023559,0.0006273097,0.0028368444,0.0031562678,0.00652935,0.0016083837,0.0031143066,0.021116378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034474519,0.00078161666,0.00047323544,0.0031331314,0.0018487471,0.0063603665,0.0014130594,0.0026174074,0.011864665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007984902,0.00001808949,0.00015588637,0.00023165968,0.000004312756,0.00004457122,0.00068832067,0.00008116879,0.000040629067,0.011128459,0.9167577,0.07084135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028300074,0.0000033564536,0.00070900447,0.00054877554,0.0000053778926,0.00008371959,0.0007750986,0.00007969464,0.00005670442,0.0048934068,0.9928343,0.0000078151525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055913497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15119885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9440865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00499966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009401574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11117613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607326201","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4556","title":"Gavin Drewry, Louis Blom-Cooper, Charles Blake, The Court of Appeal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Restructuring; Law; Legislation; Economic Justice; Political science; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Sociology; History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09751438710130468,"score_gpt":0.38737287996961767,"score_spread":0.289858492868313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607326201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069203144,0.077492505,0.0014456871,0.769825,0.00465719,0.000054059754,0.00027986703,0.00007704763,0.13924834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1937889,0.11210203,0.0032427905,0.21949615,0.004914493,0.00015140834,0.000328671,0.0003513437,0.46562424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996108,0.001334786,0.00014538411,0.0005263132,0.0015551092,0.00033044856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844349,0.009999788,0.0006462712,0.00027907707,0.0030455836,0.0015943783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00427933,0.00029203697,0.00038185247,0.0018881201,0.009827271,0.009547307,0.0013012952,0.005058258,0.018300463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025769165,0.0005632774,0.00015608562,0.0020020008,0.005219237,0.008780984,0.0025825705,0.008350201,0.0046371846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011608786,0.000024343144,0.0011441578,0.00007859172,0.0000040268765,0.00012330606,0.0034741473,0.00004684877,0.0000528797,0.10962358,0.86471367,0.020702722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007974184,0.000009108349,0.0029939043,0.000498123,0.0000045672164,0.00015609097,0.010327972,0.000111279696,0.00016798679,0.031783894,0.9539087,0.000030484267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056127485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17833053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056127485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068234247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010238876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11160159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607339964","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4496","title":"William Twining, General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.10031398651527838,"score_gpt":0.42151995407424686,"score_spread":0.32120596755896846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607339964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00855184,0.37190634,0.02409757,0.41328436,0.0038502056,0.000053318767,0.00012930398,0.000092346476,0.17803475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4661329,0.25959995,0.020606432,0.103112794,0.0068662236,0.00022436523,0.00019956197,0.00036398624,0.1428938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970795,0.0014789376,0.0001226777,0.00038305792,0.000710211,0.00022566401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975165,0.0017203424,0.0001475308,0.00016641492,0.00026793676,0.00018126951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033818332,0.00069026416,0.00062146864,0.0019437734,0.0052549867,0.006649202,0.0011597073,0.006541077,0.0043152454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060986606,0.00067872327,0.0003652718,0.003072846,0.020083666,0.020759005,0.0032884972,0.008547304,0.00071379944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016079312,0.000013273033,0.00032006792,0.00007803115,0.0000063417488,0.000104625746,0.0054532816,0.00016057515,0.000117730975,0.926575,0.053170588,0.013984467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009054764,0.00000817158,0.00036420836,0.00021542648,0.000004665716,0.00011960185,0.001824307,0.00015325974,0.00016904068,0.73597914,0.2611375,0.000015640246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0171602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021692982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0171602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043967487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033716082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03412062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607397021","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4551","title":"Oren Ben-Dor, Thinking About Law: In Silence with Heidegger","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Relation (database); Economic Justice; Socratic method; Hebrew; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03537546077903161,"score_gpt":0.3137322866426292,"score_spread":0.2783568258635976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607397021","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00097294344,0.25923538,0.0012331138,0.68355876,0.012986697,0.00002968248,0.00009472269,0.00006544526,0.041823287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044733718,0.15975194,0.0032745672,0.6005579,0.015471218,0.00020242971,0.000112119174,0.0005078278,0.17538826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968836,0.0016968024,0.00012752412,0.0003785939,0.0006924578,0.00022106786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573517,0.0031086688,0.0001898612,0.000120409386,0.00046192776,0.00038399236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046476815,0.0008958166,0.0007308926,0.0010921427,0.007408594,0.006119132,0.002042895,0.009875205,0.010628597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010407774,0.0006741372,0.00036381095,0.0014685609,0.0125669,0.015422496,0.003066488,0.012228165,0.0047661774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026534184,0.000020799527,0.00013374399,0.00013188588,0.000005524782,0.000113941845,0.008494531,0.000034992503,0.00007420364,0.06500991,0.9068848,0.019069137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013317772,0.000008359815,0.00037776676,0.0005067217,0.0000033165763,0.0001418763,0.0062208,0.00004027526,0.00012774926,0.028827244,0.9637028,0.000029801091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037498575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08629014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037498575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003952917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036636093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07456058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607470646","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4557","title":"Nudge...Fat...Drugs: Permit but Discourage – The Regulation of Excessive Consumption","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Betrayal; Happiness; Consumption (sociology); Political science; Multitude; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.057341076543650615,"score_gpt":0.38025577644271913,"score_spread":0.3229146998990685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607470646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009196926,0.035919867,0.0064732498,0.31841138,0.0044313525,0.00007091917,0.00024570292,0.0003219519,0.62492865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24445365,0.026430756,0.0060621756,0.17889166,0.0018988162,0.00022742797,0.00018518933,0.00034412165,0.54150623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876285,0.0004944981,0.00005266262,0.00014767823,0.0003651723,0.00017721235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881434,0.00042278864,0.00014711119,0.00016387668,0.00023028758,0.00022160697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014102437,0.00030020362,0.00025496364,0.00045302915,0.0025467156,0.003448012,0.0005029176,0.003161484,0.01737288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031563265,0.00029451738,0.00019967467,0.00034587484,0.012481056,0.0040633394,0.0016818567,0.0043164827,0.005897858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004841852,0.000081650054,0.0010666912,0.00025346348,0.000015219384,0.00009762898,0.004142824,0.00009425716,0.0019314241,0.48035228,0.41129532,0.1006208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010330692,0.000031456588,0.0015594477,0.00017620012,0.000005166738,0.00008779379,0.0013601045,0.00003678356,0.000547651,0.025426812,0.97074413,0.000014139516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015057021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029975336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01737288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001655528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029326293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058118045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610167096","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4888","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF THE SOUTH: INDIGENOUS WATER RIGHTS IN CHILE - ANOTHER STEP IN THE “CIVILIZING MISSION?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Centro de Recursos Hídricos para la Agricultura y la Minería; Universidad de Concepción; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Colonialism; Realm; Law; Scholarship; International law; Human rights; Subject (documents); Indigenous rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.10371930265903341,"score_gpt":0.38210742238380613,"score_spread":0.27838811972477273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610167096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14852743,0.012344098,0.0029314156,0.24621569,0.0004431684,0.000060607632,0.00009081725,0.000035038654,0.58935183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93994397,0.004680604,0.0009740589,0.011365362,0.00034768454,0.00010026855,0.000045815752,0.000029760584,0.042512413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826545,0.00084177166,0.00004301674,0.00016560512,0.00033238973,0.00035188333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851567,0.0008835401,0.00014753667,0.00014221246,0.00014726173,0.00016387236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041978164,0.000260568,0.0002957763,0.00079116505,0.009340188,0.008589355,0.0010094215,0.0024661934,0.004864243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004953179,0.00019929501,0.00024134206,0.0010927202,0.031289905,0.006081389,0.0086303,0.0059151803,0.00027227192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008227807,0.0000133255835,0.0005164543,0.000075216674,0.0000034772074,0.00029953715,0.031187674,0.00015213629,0.00028570942,0.958259,0.0034660555,0.005733138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028180712,0.000023881763,0.0039874064,0.0005978036,0.000014484704,0.0003114174,0.070577435,0.00032526546,0.00082893344,0.46997637,0.45328516,0.000043713873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039046515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044975523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039046515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013160017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017289026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095483065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610885289","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4885","title":"PRAXIS AND THE INTERNATIONAL (HUMAN RIGHTS) LAW SCHOLAR: TOWARD THE INTENSIFICATION OF TWAILIAN DRAMATURGY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Human rights; Politics; Subaltern; Normative; Sociology; Context (archaeology); International law; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052800938702867395,"score_gpt":0.36718411928522443,"score_spread":0.31438318058235704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610885289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29183728,0.007059768,0.020700647,0.16447403,0.0014596886,0.00012357785,0.000035816025,0.00021816083,0.5140911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647657,0.0008547965,0.0017513451,0.005539863,0.00021865482,0.000059033795,0.0000114897375,0.00005709825,0.026741972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897168,0.006737416,0.0001798319,0.00078502,0.0011082699,0.0014727137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926341,0.004437873,0.0009485768,0.0005349247,0.0005027266,0.0009419195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011913781,0.00047691463,0.00047221233,0.0016889282,0.017964939,0.017548276,0.0018074017,0.005581373,0.0032442976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011560727,0.00026776094,0.00033724814,0.0017396135,0.08855834,0.014272217,0.015615324,0.014179964,0.0003806652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007945774,0.000015952795,0.00030880974,0.000040213745,0.0000018326662,0.00020610694,0.42768246,0.000057525962,0.00022833842,0.5646381,0.0024798538,0.00433297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009602843,0.000052395873,0.0008393508,0.00040002613,0.000004444086,0.00051441655,0.5176719,0.00045352118,0.0008807175,0.13511424,0.34402046,0.00003894121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010499564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01399326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017964939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011122375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009184989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08069885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611587239","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4887","title":"LEGAL SCHOLACTIVISTS IN THE THIRD WORLD: BETWEEN AMBITION, ALTRUISM AND ACCESS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subaltern; Situated; Third world; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Law; History; Economic history","score_opus":0.07499485072966822,"score_gpt":0.4058455047294704,"score_spread":0.3308506539998022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611587239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47939274,0.0032992607,0.0040596807,0.04667567,0.00022482387,0.00003421063,0.000026960333,0.00003553294,0.46625108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99013585,0.0003613765,0.0001870223,0.0011480151,0.000023309098,0.000011225384,0.0000039238826,0.00000893422,0.008120335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995096,0.0030589595,0.000085994354,0.00022819411,0.0006381371,0.000892704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99394315,0.0024111276,0.0007643925,0.00036439847,0.00040161514,0.0021153176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046800673,0.00012932501,0.00020062849,0.0010100675,0.010095803,0.010430921,0.0004694148,0.0018861146,0.0047101025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067469096,0.00016063095,0.0001397978,0.00078041287,0.029248841,0.006030483,0.012166164,0.003999898,0.00035803093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026716321,0.000055935256,0.0067652203,0.000028821078,0.0000065193776,0.000472612,0.29358265,0.000058534057,0.00027204608,0.6800271,0.0042599323,0.01444386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021090666,0.00009342264,0.015396967,0.00043283802,0.000011744444,0.0010061857,0.41938284,0.00043460546,0.00039192845,0.22051205,0.34224075,0.0000756051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093330555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015651222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010430921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040797126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004421811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02960056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618196792","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5006","title":"COLD, HARD JUSTICE LESSONS FROM THE FLEET: INNOVATING FROM THE BOTTOM UP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incubator; Popularity; Economic Justice; Legal service; Mentorship; Service (business); Legal research; Legal profession; Entrepreneurship; Legal practice; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.17588333222656177,"score_gpt":0.448297613723316,"score_spread":0.27241428149675423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618196792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19792818,0.011683877,0.028023114,0.23870744,0.0023933058,0.00035675388,0.0001073431,0.0005623741,0.52023757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.741873,0.014254831,0.036535777,0.03149283,0.000372665,0.0001856667,0.00013718329,0.00042674417,0.17472126],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996606,0.0013822264,0.000060197235,0.0002520753,0.000804056,0.00089536246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957546,0.0010227074,0.00017313563,0.00026678588,0.00041842664,0.0023642692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004349944,0.00034775204,0.00026455775,0.0010257786,0.009593528,0.011396528,0.0015661983,0.0028124764,0.012442602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00713332,0.00027495937,0.00039981387,0.0007479535,0.012566966,0.011096471,0.011869194,0.0050131734,0.002756331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046744342,0.00051723927,0.008028989,0.00048328054,0.000023190432,0.001550023,0.17848906,0.0006320008,0.0022027504,0.18725261,0.13446683,0.48630732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001283916,0.00021286451,0.0046217367,0.00095486233,0.00001436002,0.0004275712,0.1291558,0.00041131908,0.0006729501,0.04546889,0.81800234,0.000044486904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027157973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13387579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027157973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007680507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02672634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05572623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W272099124","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4616","title":"Figuring Reconciliation: Dancing With the Enemy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Dance; Politics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Literature; Law; History; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08357554898578719,"score_gpt":0.29594466241741274,"score_spread":0.21236911343162557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W272099124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19464704,0.006145091,0.017211212,0.04056745,0.0015604335,0.00006010267,0.000035724726,0.00019909468,0.7395739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96032566,0.0010303343,0.0032886914,0.00108683,0.00019194836,0.000044792017,0.000025121877,0.00010568801,0.033900835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958294,0.0029894884,0.000056888013,0.00027666145,0.00051637006,0.0003311605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984615,0.00085839565,0.00015433501,0.00017644514,0.00014781344,0.0002014869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00322617,0.0005680892,0.00035166164,0.00120267,0.01527363,0.007729856,0.001154053,0.00235552,0.0059635495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064740414,0.00018347203,0.000265828,0.00075988343,0.016567389,0.0066247717,0.0059538847,0.0034987608,0.0008026926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006400713,0.000032064316,0.0011662157,0.00016713979,0.000014182148,0.0006787242,0.38294637,0.00019521845,0.0014325996,0.5558052,0.014708566,0.042789735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015608268,0.00007452704,0.0019647013,0.00058972073,0.000025616766,0.0006926828,0.28163278,0.00060926616,0.0020245675,0.07122824,0.6411119,0.000030395893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004719861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014868913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99528015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036710263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026231657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02663523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737184433","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5009","title":"A THIRD REVOLUTION IN FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTION: ACCESSIBLE LEGAL PROFESSIONALISM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Law; Dispute resolution; Political science; Doctrine; Alternative dispute resolution; Practice of law; Sociology; Legal practice; Service (business); Legal profession; Business","score_opus":0.09713719114710222,"score_gpt":0.4104399470507432,"score_spread":0.313302755903641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737184433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31313738,0.017649988,0.01503321,0.15319538,0.000523487,0.00015365909,0.00019243581,0.00015333864,0.4999612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621617,0.004357213,0.0041736397,0.004252138,0.00008437447,0.00002453122,0.000042861375,0.00002085851,0.02488259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950505,0.00069392513,0.00008386726,0.0004179936,0.0020522072,0.0017015334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951139,0.0012510356,0.0003170839,0.00044243896,0.001143205,0.0017323383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031438281,0.00014027183,0.00022586384,0.0017831858,0.012454087,0.006992619,0.0013520927,0.001921408,0.0055802907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00672779,0.00018236991,0.00037278142,0.0020331172,0.022183882,0.004214067,0.00524263,0.0026644217,0.00020589429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020813322,0.00005679682,0.0069305967,0.00012075116,0.000006543546,0.0004269397,0.04121637,0.00055475073,0.0003552152,0.8122344,0.015565764,0.12251113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026766613,0.00008308093,0.040774006,0.0006491652,0.000020002959,0.0006635831,0.04680397,0.0015925289,0.0006634072,0.12375792,0.78488314,0.00008244178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9162753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9486666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07570172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.126576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54925704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771611331","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5012","title":"ENHANCING THE LEGAL PROFESSION’S CAPACITY FOR INNOVATION: THE PROMISE OF REFLECTIVE PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH FOR INCREASING ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Enabling; Economic Justice; Sociology; Public relations; Action (physics); Action research; Legal profession; Reflective practice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.38929909219707365,"score_gpt":0.5793227361091744,"score_spread":0.19002364391210075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771611331","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022089921,0.030263612,0.13036665,0.6984247,0.0022397647,0.0005159586,0.000045051205,0.0004498713,0.11560444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67571837,0.031641085,0.21693365,0.062180445,0.002385078,0.0015430489,0.000066568326,0.00028916184,0.00924267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.82434744,0.14898716,0.0025294246,0.0058587976,0.013618196,0.004658922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61174977,0.33445287,0.008032794,0.026179552,0.007850479,0.01173452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14600545,0.0010716813,0.0012852864,0.004115689,0.012778898,0.03170804,0.0054515135,0.01435722,0.0055079106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13558517,0.0009820448,0.0016908186,0.002384961,0.10023804,0.04545714,0.028480923,0.01641969,0.0018964048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054047803,0.00035425325,0.0018343573,0.0018980483,0.000059595295,0.0004805938,0.10037727,0.0008154039,0.0008003635,0.71876276,0.013479158,0.16108419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007020856,0.00017316997,0.00073055224,0.0038730332,0.00003092848,0.00041494833,0.0338177,0.0014031325,0.0010063848,0.79519796,0.16316149,0.00012054894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034112418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004843272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14600545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012050628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050485685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7721599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773616646","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.4999","title":"BUILDING BETTER LAW: HOW DESIGN THINKING CAN HELP US BE BETTER LAWYERS, MEET NEW CHALLENGES, AND CREATE THE FUTURE OF LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; J.W. McConnell Family Foundation","keywords":"Mindset; Variety (cybernetics); Design thinking; Relevance (law); Law; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Engineering ethics; Practice of law; Legal profession; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08205352888496954,"score_gpt":0.2842031446469419,"score_spread":0.20214961576197238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773616646","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009406174,0.024864167,0.37372297,0.28614962,0.0031990171,0.00040949116,0.00015287913,0.0011570756,0.30093867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39591843,0.03374321,0.48088044,0.038417105,0.001613561,0.001244148,0.00030639884,0.0011337381,0.04674303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752331,0.018024815,0.00077146903,0.0014306948,0.0033772178,0.0011626261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977856,0.015489253,0.00075986993,0.0029393446,0.0016557467,0.0012996973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025305817,0.0013869797,0.0009728864,0.0037853837,0.0074313655,0.028106924,0.0034672108,0.0077594607,0.008116701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022410238,0.0008713748,0.0012222636,0.0021818993,0.052168906,0.035397314,0.007986963,0.009597832,0.002862632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009227309,0.000053295942,0.00024139082,0.00033347536,0.000023899174,0.00008656735,0.009718606,0.0009224443,0.00023956578,0.9437042,0.016895326,0.027772069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000139786835,0.000034775043,0.00009876603,0.00058728014,0.000013333593,0.000115451134,0.0057986802,0.0008489402,0.00034789625,0.7772335,0.21487562,0.000031746702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004653378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005745745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028106924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009168158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013238864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13383156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774264718","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5011","title":"READING LAW AND IMAGINING JUSTICE IN THE WAHKOHTOWIN CLASSROOM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Injustice; Sociology; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Reading (process); Class (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.09807585211070377,"score_gpt":0.44257968607187576,"score_spread":0.344503833961172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774264718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8669382,0.00138422,0.0015388314,0.009070028,0.00026890688,0.00008547502,0.000046297362,0.00006058283,0.12060755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97266454,0.0013810776,0.001548374,0.0014633756,0.000030879077,0.000070424336,0.000050054285,0.00003987819,0.022751441],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835134,0.0005422004,0.000032829885,0.00018468282,0.00015607229,0.0007329356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988933,0.00034609745,0.00008810611,0.000071761526,0.00007961979,0.0005210841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015891857,0.0007260643,0.00048093978,0.0011323473,0.01770674,0.0092461165,0.0013951934,0.0024064803,0.0061833244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017120481,0.00050152454,0.00030814586,0.0009476443,0.022556253,0.005633213,0.0067501003,0.0047901566,0.00078489486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037519854,0.00043867977,0.008412625,0.0001618523,0.000015341831,0.002274939,0.8976502,0.00018067157,0.004119526,0.051416002,0.00952027,0.0257725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015382173,0.000055557342,0.008334731,0.00022269801,0.000009645344,0.00027808966,0.88619673,0.00010718726,0.0005407817,0.0112858405,0.092924125,0.000029229623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16828963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46083364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83171034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012431305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019106178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33462018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775178260","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.4996","title":"THE STORY OF THE BC FAMILY JUSTICE INNOVATION LAB","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Multitude; Theme (computing); Sociology; Transition (genetics); Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24879320597142035,"score_gpt":0.4436518285030475,"score_spread":0.19485862253162717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775178260","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02285736,0.009678974,0.0028834962,0.6168981,0.0036557093,0.00008848335,0.00033205427,0.0001572799,0.34344846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45160893,0.011526585,0.004684422,0.12451425,0.0013173411,0.00033216813,0.00024327725,0.00044277322,0.4053302],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917203,0.0040534325,0.00007527697,0.0005046327,0.0021656007,0.0014807644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908221,0.002675172,0.00027854883,0.00037355284,0.0018195723,0.0040311385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004285865,0.00048698342,0.0004198798,0.00069878856,0.03241491,0.013979661,0.002154939,0.005425731,0.016244387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013310285,0.00033862234,0.00030422903,0.0013537182,0.018065382,0.0050820475,0.005594186,0.012705565,0.0031016897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060002098,0.000114717965,0.00092383125,0.00009048908,0.000011634833,0.00093663967,0.036570713,0.0003844121,0.00023296222,0.12665564,0.7980092,0.036009822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058530395,0.000020590638,0.00035382606,0.00013783548,0.000002859184,0.00017573628,0.01856448,0.000186472,0.00019358461,0.00918226,0.97115064,0.00002599398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31137002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43002987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97303456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026965464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03245786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6191153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775375763","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5010","title":"COLLABORATIVE POLICY-MAKING, LAW STUDENTS, AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: THE REWARDS OF DESTABILIZING INSTITUTIONAL PATTERNS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Public defender; Law; Public relations; Law and economics; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.09752159562412278,"score_gpt":0.4991703045752187,"score_spread":0.40164870895109595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775375763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8700614,0.000402502,0.00449165,0.036690958,0.00017841332,0.00012362054,0.0000679183,0.00005752146,0.08792601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423486,0.00012246895,0.00075909786,0.0010999944,0.00001310688,0.000051904415,0.000012216607,0.000020378116,0.0036858607],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694017,0.02205368,0.00051109673,0.0020985703,0.002207781,0.003727118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96933866,0.013683402,0.0021480492,0.005027284,0.002296197,0.007506529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021759827,0.00033896053,0.0005336608,0.0016966187,0.034566917,0.028542973,0.0027082632,0.0033229096,0.008300814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035970025,0.0004788239,0.00032077896,0.002698375,0.04817417,0.009928344,0.03397998,0.0072889565,0.00062879507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093865834,0.00038374378,0.026489386,0.0000825047,0.000036503094,0.00066915865,0.7063062,0.00044986903,0.00093727047,0.218669,0.0066806637,0.039201807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005998246,0.000091562426,0.011224666,0.0001943823,0.000025811276,0.0001457455,0.8258468,0.0006733441,0.0007407556,0.06978951,0.091135204,0.00007225295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11204698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2325044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88795304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02669259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046865974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22278959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775761272","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5008","title":"ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND JUSTICE SYSTEM INTEGRATION: BRITISH COLUMBIA’S CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Proposition; Transformational leadership; Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Mediation; Computer science; Public relations; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.037443886373358194,"score_gpt":0.28219286545571165,"score_spread":0.24474897908235346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775761272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14314567,0.007937738,0.0031747026,0.08138497,0.0012431841,0.00030057697,0.0005027696,0.00026194722,0.76204836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6636454,0.0027208717,0.0030712613,0.01691748,0.0001762068,0.00015921146,0.0004830153,0.00011841355,0.3127081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876694,0.0016120536,0.00028813363,0.0007260169,0.005277485,0.0044269986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99111664,0.0019922727,0.00028280145,0.00060859206,0.0034012431,0.0025984591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004385267,0.0002865485,0.0003617895,0.0018891322,0.03525485,0.020856781,0.0026771915,0.0052956594,0.018451972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010816504,0.0004831347,0.00028911207,0.0041231345,0.0075338087,0.0037491606,0.006699933,0.007022098,0.001586283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011403044,0.00039728233,0.012552079,0.00028413304,0.000043411077,0.002840454,0.03332666,0.0015745386,0.0012293332,0.3834729,0.28026706,0.28389817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040356357,0.000046909114,0.02377787,0.00026843714,0.00002138622,0.00030325228,0.02856733,0.0011998803,0.0005670046,0.009903426,0.935169,0.00013524514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98011625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99143815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10977835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10977835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15293959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7965014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784823737","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5109","title":"Securing the Future of Copyright Users’ Rights in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Reservation of rights; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Covenant; Balance (ability); Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Public rights; Legislation; Law and economics; Cultural rights; Right to property; Public interest; Sociology","score_opus":0.020950576366696914,"score_gpt":0.23361967145279325,"score_spread":0.21266909508609633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784823737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10238287,0.008821233,0.0043717464,0.20103727,0.0010955413,0.00014683348,0.00044046013,0.00015158323,0.6815524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84498304,0.0062012854,0.0052482593,0.018484656,0.0002130889,0.000053166,0.0001782793,0.00007205718,0.12456624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99143654,0.00081242324,0.00022538134,0.00069046847,0.003871772,0.0029634058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98787934,0.002534148,0.00049111573,0.00044864087,0.006487576,0.002159333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055972217,0.0002969993,0.000395041,0.002164739,0.029129416,0.020156693,0.0022385803,0.0057509937,0.007109214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014596728,0.0004335015,0.0005510306,0.003255707,0.016053699,0.00520446,0.004247583,0.006364499,0.000549092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024604893,0.000020626932,0.002857422,0.00007936968,0.00000871824,0.00048524223,0.017222423,0.00053126074,0.00034441162,0.90322906,0.0429206,0.032276157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026303393,0.000026558482,0.00868149,0.00051207514,0.000048581387,0.00017258932,0.02146509,0.0022151687,0.0009925277,0.086182185,0.8794992,0.00017809456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99593544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22456023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22456023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38772634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89940023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787958489","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5025","title":"PRIORITIZING CHILDREN’S BEST INTERESTS IN CANADIAN YOUTH JUSTICE: ARTICLE 3 OF THE UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD AND CHILD-FRIENDLY ALTERNATIVES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Punitive damages; Economic Justice; Mirroring; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Convention; Declaration; Child protection; Sociology; Duty; Juvenile delinquency; Criminology","score_opus":0.03251033438924564,"score_gpt":0.3422734066505872,"score_spread":0.3097630722613416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787958489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027496047,0.04099073,0.00364041,0.20150688,0.0028054768,0.00016012871,0.0006657423,0.000104553284,0.7226301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6279073,0.033159263,0.00883251,0.05306708,0.0008556607,0.0001914511,0.00041545552,0.0002127061,0.27535868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937325,0.0007926757,0.0001576766,0.00032413172,0.0027913975,0.0022015513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758744,0.00047660785,0.00013349944,0.00009623153,0.0010265216,0.0006796689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034764346,0.0004211319,0.00035650114,0.0014024309,0.018821642,0.009080995,0.0017249804,0.004915121,0.005171292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005885453,0.00040398593,0.0004442419,0.0019992162,0.013706259,0.0026897155,0.003981986,0.0059115286,0.00046591714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014277009,0.000018998171,0.0018915209,0.00008678256,0.00000636883,0.00034158604,0.026185505,0.00022767702,0.00022139198,0.79795593,0.13558938,0.03746061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008425398,0.000011422894,0.0063878587,0.0004099305,0.000014744086,0.00022424283,0.009869697,0.00019784304,0.00036476323,0.0301712,0.9522627,0.00007730286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98622584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099129334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099129334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20127219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.719237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788576041","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5023","title":"ANTICIPATING AND MANAGING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL COST OF CIVIL LITIGATION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Public relations; State (computer science); Social psychology; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.17421081707730832,"score_gpt":0.5146753510708778,"score_spread":0.34046453399356946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788576041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6821572,0.008184992,0.00849596,0.15247466,0.00076238246,0.00014463303,0.00004688455,0.00010395931,0.1476293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97722113,0.0060325586,0.0034897476,0.0047236527,0.00031806983,0.000059943814,0.000032498552,0.000022062679,0.008100369],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960509,0.0017685106,0.00009882409,0.00014766061,0.00117323,0.0007609182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943709,0.0021853533,0.0012290842,0.00016831107,0.00044847353,0.0015979056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027797206,0.00023203835,0.00028357064,0.00079167413,0.0035305794,0.006348702,0.0008411217,0.0022456686,0.007911812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016859056,0.00020828606,0.00025493154,0.00035580696,0.0036241005,0.0029259652,0.005129452,0.0045765615,0.0008001633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017383922,0.0017140323,0.08148213,0.00051223964,0.00012968428,0.0055360673,0.127334,0.0012269032,0.0060284734,0.06334733,0.051738106,0.66077715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006714414,0.0014646851,0.18261226,0.0014620146,0.0001052906,0.014042275,0.41695523,0.004043716,0.002315002,0.110649824,0.26609254,0.00019009854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024403343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061966917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007911812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025519233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005483592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026467621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788672079","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5019","title":"THE INACCESSIBILITY OF JUSTICE FOR MIGRANT WORKERS: A CAPABILITIES-BASED PERSPECTIVE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Perspective (graphical); Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Migrant workers; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Empirical research; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05370722291969057,"score_gpt":0.397786856034735,"score_spread":0.3440796331150444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788672079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28400394,0.0069332942,0.014821449,0.11987464,0.00035071096,0.00006307035,0.00008248934,0.00003572022,0.57383466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98953235,0.0016398611,0.0007480277,0.001740684,0.00011249124,0.00003606566,0.000011187856,0.000007801078,0.0061715054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791795,0.000849416,0.000048871563,0.00015661557,0.00026828167,0.00075888116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970168,0.001540555,0.00048968144,0.00016990711,0.0002873354,0.00049567624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024879777,0.00032874124,0.00021776897,0.0015692478,0.004950057,0.0072998228,0.00112472,0.0026567325,0.002985786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043410524,0.0001825639,0.00032584596,0.0006525988,0.024390776,0.0054058232,0.0060518943,0.003957525,0.00014756159],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005930387,0.00001749586,0.001478137,0.00003250174,0.000003390757,0.00038014137,0.020282848,0.00026792317,0.00012879526,0.9720495,0.000909774,0.00444361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019315969,0.00011368671,0.008664399,0.0014531387,0.000023623597,0.0008217206,0.13799171,0.0013088386,0.00061465136,0.706834,0.14210841,0.00004656007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020128733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021145264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020128733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045104926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007954511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040023148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788940108","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5024","title":"THE SILENCING OF QUEER VOICES IN THE LITIGATION OVER TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY’S PROPOSED LAW SCHOOL","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Dissent; Queer theory; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.043494779736410506,"score_gpt":0.32876822792399235,"score_spread":0.2852734481875818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788940108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4242581,0.0056459033,0.003948106,0.20025155,0.0011276073,0.000078138815,0.00006262418,0.000056916197,0.36457103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95323944,0.0008914555,0.000523672,0.01946791,0.00016375851,0.00003695787,0.000017222283,0.000027554588,0.025632035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97981596,0.0064494377,0.0006506701,0.0017775019,0.0068989033,0.0044075777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97878253,0.012986572,0.0018578854,0.00076580787,0.004025294,0.0015817693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015435447,0.00025620812,0.00036160057,0.002082953,0.04704622,0.0149600515,0.0025167058,0.009513517,0.004280482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034262598,0.0005911663,0.00039624455,0.0020722048,0.03633029,0.009099567,0.009095694,0.012331756,0.00033347518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023254026,0.00002545032,0.0040167365,0.0000727228,0.000007916464,0.0013091798,0.40648466,0.00012101717,0.0009926109,0.55569434,0.01704468,0.014207473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023729082,0.000083288935,0.01710076,0.0008313105,0.000055057186,0.0006548845,0.46983594,0.0005552884,0.0036045732,0.044212267,0.46278277,0.0002601733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60167116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7888679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39832884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05175354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042921048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80134934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789004301","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5020","title":"REDUCING THE “JUSTICE GAP” THROUGH ACCESS TO LEGAL INFORMATION: ESTABLISHING ACCESS TO JUSTICE ENTRY POINTS AT PUBLIC LIBRARIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public access; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intermediary; Public relations; Information access; Scope (computer science); Law; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Internet privacy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13096704119874325,"score_gpt":0.40694695882814635,"score_spread":0.2759799176294031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789004301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70540655,0.0013581935,0.025295394,0.038827397,0.00019725229,0.0006342153,0.00008336916,0.0005636423,0.22763395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718769,0.0005544184,0.0081672175,0.0014051273,0.00008322159,0.00015457478,0.00004313878,0.000041270854,0.01767422],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272704,0.0031314238,0.00031281912,0.00043039036,0.0010961507,0.0023021873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776019,0.010016901,0.002292137,0.0017593501,0.0035171683,0.004812592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059322026,0.00020971787,0.00034495757,0.0026684224,0.013045257,0.015943164,0.002964029,0.0037181724,0.021062192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02524626,0.00047425693,0.00036594324,0.0021907443,0.006838251,0.015181931,0.019624723,0.0027315642,0.0022209594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002746698,0.0022859906,0.073221326,0.00057798787,0.000033160213,0.0039849756,0.14331332,0.0013650182,0.0040429807,0.31101766,0.027227493,0.43265545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020841604,0.0021388512,0.09816653,0.0021172187,0.00012843189,0.002197677,0.35142428,0.005345675,0.009575351,0.11357661,0.41483504,0.00028588227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011756218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03428453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98824376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058294777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0181762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07046008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789029632","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5022","title":"COLONIAL LEGACIES AND COMPETING MASCULINITIES: THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA’S RETURN TO REASON IN R. V. KAPP","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Colonialism; Economic Justice; Race (biology); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02513155698544115,"score_gpt":0.27654051279081165,"score_spread":0.2514089558053705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789029632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36259696,0.015684525,0.0012728106,0.27509692,0.0023358038,0.0001141341,0.0002049816,0.00005432924,0.3426396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9023328,0.0025913257,0.00039764208,0.040690467,0.00022895109,0.000025915553,0.000028095354,0.0000734553,0.053631466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215114,0.0011392344,0.000102006576,0.00073560403,0.0018835942,0.003988514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583554,0.0017406635,0.0001786614,0.00013221592,0.00086605863,0.0012469371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059288037,0.00038861937,0.0008183464,0.0012192893,0.076727904,0.015068226,0.0031185835,0.01279877,0.004621428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010708548,0.00078058016,0.0005402165,0.002080143,0.03768315,0.0035049738,0.007214219,0.01819655,0.0002678046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009278621,0.000049240713,0.0050048637,0.00008072869,0.00004097073,0.005180202,0.2542424,0.000471539,0.0007820282,0.62399805,0.08780486,0.022252345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005337751,0.00004937121,0.012767501,0.00045272574,0.0000797218,0.0008568074,0.20118564,0.0005292302,0.00091686234,0.04315661,0.7396515,0.00030070802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99198264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99778914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15438001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15438001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21242586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789070291","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5021","title":"OUT OF THE CLOSET AND UP THE LADDER? DIVERSITY IN ONTARIO’S BIG LAW FIRMS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Closet; Lesbian; Negotiation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Legal profession; Public relations; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1411676094563412,"score_gpt":0.3840802655985737,"score_spread":0.24291265614223254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789070291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97091,0.00047715034,0.00011764479,0.008916336,0.000045474826,0.000025504101,0.000048372625,0.0000055053592,0.01945412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900892,0.00036065571,0.00007949824,0.0008987681,0.0000094821335,0.000009010346,0.000020633091,0.000005332342,0.008527551],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969501,0.000651436,0.000055763678,0.0002238419,0.0006195474,0.0014993827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946367,0.0008737665,0.000490671,0.00012850946,0.00032234582,0.0035479153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016511667,0.00014358056,0.00027291023,0.0007273552,0.028686306,0.007629405,0.0013040222,0.0014544209,0.0055824155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033239124,0.00029714004,0.00013386093,0.0021039876,0.014006189,0.0024506452,0.0062580174,0.0020259088,0.00024325952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004408086,0.000065175875,0.023676137,0.00006471477,0.0000048527736,0.0017140527,0.94107014,0.000064565706,0.0008622502,0.009011921,0.0072317575,0.016190367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042194756,0.000028373066,0.033504684,0.000084945685,0.000002135074,0.0001263885,0.913556,0.000051377763,0.00007262173,0.00070986256,0.05184268,0.000016766933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8490469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9601095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15095311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055199113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046762154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40049952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790950295","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5043","title":"LAWYER COMPETENCIES FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE: TWO EMPIRICAL STUDIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Thompson Rivers University; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Framing (construction); Economic Justice; Sociology; Critical reflection; Legal profession; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.34434728378089996,"score_gpt":0.5682591560974322,"score_spread":0.2239118723165322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790950295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800008,0.0031402712,0.00064338784,0.0025349404,0.000039256644,0.0005164073,0.00025660213,0.0000098525725,0.012858532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99306387,0.0019914645,0.000855941,0.0012496972,0.000048678477,0.0008779772,0.0003152244,0.000018400568,0.0015787373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97630936,0.014001852,0.0017731313,0.0018751036,0.003839375,0.0022011593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5940801,0.34459025,0.030064603,0.010347519,0.014494726,0.0064228377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039164726,0.00069353933,0.00091078784,0.0063859574,0.007722903,0.006823596,0.0034513841,0.0039149076,0.012996368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16808142,0.0011793734,0.0006735714,0.007546476,0.010199542,0.0117200315,0.011630823,0.008563434,0.0009837445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005520191,0.01331558,0.28156313,0.0024211598,0.00019255852,0.0014666812,0.6192675,0.00015619717,0.00042983872,0.023184726,0.0069467193,0.050503917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002562507,0.0006513693,0.3366137,0.0039311266,0.00022533185,0.00096074364,0.6330764,0.00044185293,0.00049269863,0.0038574545,0.019402616,0.00009041672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021760015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039031755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074910005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008795211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2071253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792841334","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5042","title":"TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AND THE CHALLENGING PURSUIT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Parallels; Injustice; Transitional justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Order (exchange); Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.03941185229071531,"score_gpt":0.3462690387864825,"score_spread":0.3068571864957672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792841334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03273568,0.022392357,0.025970228,0.24403808,0.0015986896,0.000075115946,0.000050450763,0.00006621561,0.67307323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95301014,0.007971518,0.005426898,0.012999508,0.0010859927,0.0001418788,0.0000374289,0.00006504903,0.01926156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98882,0.0062994203,0.00029253706,0.0010181201,0.0014557467,0.002114064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99511296,0.0028546632,0.0003456329,0.00048507244,0.00039207883,0.00080956006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010777747,0.00045234003,0.0007391971,0.00182417,0.014092212,0.013458719,0.0018057369,0.0066949627,0.0033701488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008337789,0.00022556318,0.000578308,0.0012748174,0.09513379,0.01114311,0.013703966,0.00929425,0.0005137988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011610803,0.000003239752,0.000039409922,0.0000094534935,0.0000010220333,0.000020343488,0.0019178127,0.00005240461,0.000010990996,0.9954224,0.00075890584,0.0017629992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033824788,0.0000068725813,0.00010518851,0.00009304355,0.0000013266357,0.00003405442,0.0031170147,0.000093282106,0.000029546642,0.958085,0.038426276,0.000005056672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009803418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010912967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014092212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010984103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01562146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07969564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279931030","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4529","title":"Balancing Necessity and Individual Rights in the Fight Against Transnational Terrorism: “Targeted Killings” and International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Harm; Political science; Law; Human rights; International law; Terrorism; Norm (philosophy); State (computer science); Population; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.033224971161041957,"score_gpt":0.31984779874374564,"score_spread":0.2866228275827037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279931030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0704393,0.010695465,0.032125738,0.07704525,0.0005656813,0.000069977505,0.000036903944,0.0000373292,0.80898434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97327936,0.0025228034,0.0037360557,0.006236434,0.00045578042,0.000096686614,0.000017862078,0.000019213536,0.013635858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167037,0.0049132407,0.00030831085,0.0007373562,0.0011728075,0.0011979138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403054,0.003998492,0.0006376229,0.000531761,0.000407334,0.0003942281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009471284,0.00038045208,0.00050161063,0.0014809445,0.0056421603,0.011231797,0.0012562297,0.0067237886,0.003344992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072884015,0.00037896817,0.0005832229,0.0010715098,0.0537336,0.011579829,0.0076082814,0.006940334,0.0003166059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003741174,0.0000045538054,0.00012090861,0.000008479035,0.0000013575101,0.000031962456,0.0018122056,0.000078399156,0.00003627075,0.99555236,0.00045296585,0.0018968347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015357851,0.00003524578,0.00085025164,0.00027141976,0.000013047696,0.00015387166,0.0052820467,0.00042489744,0.00022847706,0.9297424,0.06295639,0.000026683503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006194017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007745221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011231797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047926214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051003313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050089538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280710510","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4560","title":"Equality Kapped; Media Unleashed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Media coverage; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08740563674334273,"score_gpt":0.39071923331713176,"score_spread":0.30331359657378903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W280710510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013717025,0.009719826,0.0037380895,0.14035681,0.0031243109,0.000032146363,0.00019642257,0.00013535234,0.82898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7488145,0.009342362,0.001643489,0.070200264,0.003899387,0.00007311041,0.00019149856,0.00021004584,0.1656254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433714,0.0016411358,0.00012949688,0.00046346456,0.0023329111,0.0010958908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936419,0.0036130925,0.00045123772,0.0004809772,0.0010342733,0.00077857065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030625577,0.00048024798,0.00042659094,0.0028103497,0.013985414,0.021647021,0.0013607434,0.0055126376,0.02895379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011564809,0.00040589657,0.00032620027,0.002543447,0.017600521,0.016596626,0.012858717,0.009621704,0.002243994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003145485,0.000025997078,0.00078081625,0.00013812153,0.0000069003354,0.00046783523,0.020250797,0.000086367916,0.00024400263,0.8595118,0.06363051,0.054825377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007529043,0.000014464293,0.00091922015,0.00048066204,0.000012695784,0.0002137265,0.015617549,0.00010127799,0.0005787488,0.070059046,0.91197205,0.000023021434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069467545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07478469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069467545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0114579955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010138654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13812637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883504706","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5110","title":"Calvinball: Users’ Rights, Public Choice Theory and Rules Mutable Games","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Metaphor; Politics; Normative; Narrative; Law and economics; Metagaming; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Game studies; Disadvantaged; Political science; Computer science; Aesthetics; Media studies; Law; Game theory; Sequential game; Economics; Art; Simultaneous game; Literature; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04441747048901842,"score_gpt":0.27246178173802676,"score_spread":0.22804431124900834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883504706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066832624,0.004091758,0.14528368,0.030949557,0.00040428858,0.00012577779,0.00012368488,0.00009280449,0.7520959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96445084,0.0010724931,0.0070383796,0.0011412841,0.00013668837,0.00015600657,0.0000291309,0.000032388558,0.025942694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949892,0.0035070693,0.000093066476,0.0003373719,0.0006609886,0.00041216772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937216,0.005103411,0.0003568318,0.0003632463,0.00020421909,0.0002507436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046130456,0.0005259346,0.0004630622,0.0013261158,0.002910135,0.008775993,0.0013707777,0.0031079738,0.009529046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007967974,0.0002748173,0.0004209308,0.0014955343,0.018484095,0.009978779,0.0033723032,0.0033818863,0.00052447664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002877406,0.0000064448964,0.00006225362,0.0000056220356,8.7148186e-7,0.000014814987,0.00051250303,0.00027892663,0.0000114077875,0.99722004,0.0003898287,0.0014943078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006810774,0.000009125581,0.00012378584,0.000037109487,0.000001955496,0.000018540637,0.00075970695,0.0025177156,0.00006568827,0.9803949,0.016057992,0.0000066357416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008164192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059274323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009529046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061073834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00245316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044312418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883590287","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5111","title":"The Natural Right To Parody: Assessing The (Potential) Parody/Satire Dichotomies In American And Canadian Copyright Laws","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Intellectual property; Copyright law; Normative; Statute; Natural (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Balance (ability); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.013756937038472814,"score_gpt":0.32661153164367096,"score_spread":0.31285459460519816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883590287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5040201,0.0022734543,0.003207577,0.01389364,0.0001036184,0.00018264147,0.00026652223,0.000023773095,0.47602856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948409,0.0005052266,0.0008679117,0.0006262286,0.000018679351,0.00004412962,0.00006778442,0.0000145179865,0.0030145291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97369087,0.0048795072,0.0008155027,0.0017084379,0.014382629,0.0045230477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965366,0.013643949,0.0040072934,0.0017554692,0.012525551,0.0027016075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016194224,0.00033111064,0.0006179431,0.010030408,0.020640286,0.012932629,0.0029469964,0.0030168004,0.0056651304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06522476,0.0003795365,0.0006326742,0.007854194,0.05171526,0.0086406395,0.008574964,0.0051395083,0.00027043765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008142691,0.0000435984,0.026523063,0.00009951633,0.000016179187,0.000120926525,0.075329386,0.00023478037,0.0002742469,0.8737567,0.002291774,0.02122841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007596719,0.00012273416,0.2881032,0.0015227628,0.0002118865,0.00043544127,0.32923317,0.003911066,0.00076505676,0.2297029,0.14555953,0.0003563384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9169304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95223373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08306962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07420702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06654067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53841215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883741933","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5108","title":"Copyright User Rights and Access to Justice (Introduction)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Copyright law; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Internet privacy; Humanities; Intellectual property; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03929587922700912,"score_gpt":0.2843314831938037,"score_spread":0.24503560396679458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883741933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003571524,0.077969916,0.003074844,0.02260148,0.0055399626,0.000033368804,0.00040086545,0.00007019156,0.8867379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2248867,0.123242766,0.0039492985,0.016659848,0.017334973,0.00012404079,0.00048939366,0.00014885377,0.6131641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901533,0.00024518894,0.000058336143,0.00012345736,0.0003740661,0.00018354453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991441,0.0004414894,0.000068085676,0.00007141989,0.00020368329,0.00007113724],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008352689,0.00036350047,0.00021054855,0.0015476317,0.0023321272,0.005655651,0.00055673084,0.002689141,0.028810265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00232113,0.00019929826,0.00029809057,0.0026959148,0.0057155215,0.005731241,0.0016270974,0.0029095474,0.003132134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039003826,0.000008461576,0.00018011115,0.00007403797,0.0000014231043,0.000034067878,0.00094498886,0.000051387266,0.00005333177,0.86951095,0.105907395,0.023229817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013249438,0.000009619983,0.0013120812,0.00028546256,0.0000022406148,0.00011973432,0.0006039074,0.000045439483,0.000083770465,0.08822233,0.9093061,0.000008023162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017189488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021964356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99434435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022949183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024008672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096379936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905855193","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5271","title":"Ishaq v Canada: “Social Science Facts” in Feminist Interventions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Appeal; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Psychological intervention; Economic Justice; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Jurisdiction; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0786006915450807,"score_gpt":0.40273191275980935,"score_spread":0.32413122121472865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905855193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023410365,0.015059405,0.0057548094,0.43243724,0.001087007,0.00020902324,0.00024176673,0.00007177381,0.52172863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7177877,0.012199967,0.006241673,0.20919043,0.0006040315,0.00037993418,0.00015844387,0.00007737669,0.053360533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96939397,0.010032446,0.00056266674,0.0018114245,0.011858282,0.006341266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788285,0.014909481,0.00073415734,0.0006617007,0.0034648096,0.0014012794],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022316145,0.0007036552,0.0006136029,0.0021369644,0.031581987,0.01192039,0.002530069,0.012870779,0.005429935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028330896,0.0005671345,0.0005290865,0.0025579445,0.046574242,0.0054282197,0.006535038,0.012760004,0.00037562492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024658895,0.000017731012,0.0011636147,0.00017856542,0.000013556787,0.0003110538,0.014770103,0.00027568248,0.00019444023,0.93529004,0.031789213,0.015971296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113830865,0.00005162427,0.006071825,0.0017175191,0.000095690695,0.00019710494,0.019845633,0.00078196655,0.0011648934,0.21912038,0.75071484,0.00012461902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9692755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11735554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2804437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85147804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906152195","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5689","title":"Closing the Gender Gap in Corporate Advancement: Insights and Solutions from Behavioural Economics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Incentive; Gender gap; Public relations; Scholarship; Bounded rationality; Nudge theory; Power (physics); Political science; Endowment; Marketing; Public economics; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.36478337662741084,"score_gpt":0.34749011718738637,"score_spread":0.017293259440024467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906152195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13628687,0.08492303,0.11314433,0.46578562,0.002116011,0.00021039908,0.0005453682,0.00008228282,0.19690612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923439,0.039522357,0.013076263,0.0138822505,0.0015030253,0.00024945362,0.00012780809,0.000055428074,0.008144331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948198,0.0034475625,0.00013036824,0.00048170902,0.0006259018,0.0004947232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736786,0.021812644,0.0013654993,0.0008132238,0.0013723022,0.00095772353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012156654,0.0007940952,0.0010905951,0.0036441856,0.0026370713,0.0062611797,0.0015290981,0.0032963522,0.006007373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015960207,0.00050546764,0.0009117399,0.0032574884,0.017096164,0.007864773,0.006244412,0.0045621316,0.00041756267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032190674,0.00013550415,0.0093979705,0.00032831667,0.00004313902,0.00017180979,0.0075077754,0.0012111408,0.00008225823,0.9473646,0.0029180185,0.030807337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012345392,0.000030178544,0.0061781676,0.00067498785,0.000018410656,0.00008374284,0.011767373,0.002057891,0.00006900497,0.95578897,0.023294048,0.000024934025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072212135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069935294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012156654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060284142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062034084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0642913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906213088","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5277","title":"What Are We Waiting For? It’s Time to Regulate Paralegals in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Statutory law; Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Duty; Law; Nothing; Public interest; Political science; Confidentiality; Public administration","score_opus":0.10535361073010306,"score_gpt":0.40775622145511653,"score_spread":0.30240261072501345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906213088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09949617,0.017568085,0.0018055147,0.7478129,0.0028228525,0.000117861164,0.0002967868,0.000108532106,0.12997119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75976264,0.015739992,0.002539358,0.13828017,0.0004005628,0.000061962484,0.00026464,0.00013312543,0.0828175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908087,0.00092981895,0.00014024437,0.0006075347,0.0027402549,0.0047734617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770452,0.0019781352,0.0007564729,0.00028693242,0.0061510904,0.01378223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040068226,0.0002667875,0.00051679317,0.0010083013,0.037432134,0.011572005,0.0028228948,0.004614193,0.009966184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011781595,0.00040934476,0.00044367102,0.0018495446,0.013135932,0.0034944508,0.004251225,0.010149666,0.00072887685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008767147,0.000254484,0.027370268,0.00046050258,0.0000568025,0.001577086,0.058363214,0.00075756747,0.001394601,0.2326113,0.5185262,0.15854031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037946156,0.000073065115,0.033780724,0.00097283116,0.00006615971,0.0003462655,0.077373326,0.0006271164,0.00072698895,0.014478963,0.87128514,0.00023149072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99705625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8373509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16264908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43415302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906445147","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5274","title":"Les Avocats Aux Pieds Nus En Chine, Vecteurs D’accès À La Justice?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.061287312456530296,"score_gpt":0.377069838938347,"score_spread":0.3157825264818167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906445147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3832129,0.006953429,0.00230553,0.072813496,0.00072698464,0.00014260999,0.00020484962,0.000050318373,0.5335899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92954826,0.0017624749,0.0003852168,0.002690754,0.000116182986,0.00009323376,0.00003940491,0.000019582165,0.065344855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977586,0.0006718213,0.000038812,0.00021012305,0.0004703067,0.0008503777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883276,0.0002687692,0.00015285818,0.000110090376,0.00027131257,0.0003640972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016975559,0.00025138326,0.00034827855,0.000793393,0.009596423,0.0077298307,0.0012690357,0.002953326,0.015017497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042615416,0.00016768936,0.00026731813,0.0016191832,0.013662207,0.004012831,0.00445091,0.0035562518,0.0007744188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053206848,0.000026155074,0.0060503953,0.0001112709,0.000011426131,0.0003989896,0.1192772,0.00012391296,0.00073521596,0.8474391,0.008883672,0.016889483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003895831,0.00013568846,0.05255652,0.00078409346,0.000056909223,0.00036181623,0.27049443,0.0005210879,0.0012893114,0.0827714,0.5908906,0.000099132914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1618826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3589192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1618826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011222042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016180389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32188064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916627404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5690","title":"Freedom and Access to Housing: Three Conceptions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negative liberty; Premise; State (computer science); Power (physics); Property (philosophy); Law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10248292355161469,"score_gpt":0.3805958446446976,"score_spread":0.2781129210930829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916627404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09200669,0.0194376,0.06750736,0.05669354,0.0006725147,0.00017660236,0.00038163483,0.00015726165,0.76296675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969715,0.005020761,0.0075754244,0.0020153285,0.0003878138,0.00029663226,0.00013765796,0.000050652157,0.0148006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953094,0.0016618691,0.00019416123,0.0006326018,0.0013660615,0.00083598023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727875,0.0013250608,0.0003325511,0.00040793847,0.0002702562,0.00038547366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005066388,0.00084940024,0.00083366473,0.003915019,0.0057536853,0.011854193,0.0024314784,0.0043620714,0.0056893025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005108756,0.00049663463,0.001382353,0.0027473597,0.0854581,0.015276085,0.014023372,0.0067071947,0.00045541962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025445722,0.0000059070953,0.000111470625,0.00000856695,0.0000010160352,0.000011028511,0.001336419,0.000057931873,0.000012436152,0.9969415,0.00022043355,0.0012907557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009640912,0.000009265104,0.0005671423,0.0000925815,0.0000043826403,0.00005410262,0.0019687456,0.0002622073,0.00006378082,0.98030204,0.016652104,0.00001405865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008180842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044130203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011854193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009420071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038510293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06834769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921280898","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5692","title":"George M. Duck Lecture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Windsor; Art; Humanities; Library science; Art history; Biology; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.04109636855055323,"score_gpt":0.3630343156885368,"score_spread":0.32193794713798357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921280898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011566542,0.046713296,0.00070991373,0.12231718,0.07284584,0.000055714958,0.0010726172,0.00029159998,0.75483716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057646437,0.01148055,0.0002872954,0.006232682,0.0044450588,0.000013809696,0.00020792415,0.00008408598,0.971484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983902,0.00015442411,0.0000495932,0.00027922407,0.0008042762,0.0003222741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964044,0.00019258521,0.00006633357,0.00013703838,0.0014423168,0.0017573697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013744503,0.00082294963,0.0005322509,0.0013430441,0.004774778,0.0037770565,0.00076827063,0.002419812,0.19137754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040108534,0.0004658161,0.0004152932,0.0007373369,0.0012163613,0.0019651814,0.0020823255,0.0033966945,0.08736842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067315787,0.000006861585,0.00007308806,0.0000151543445,7.567012e-7,0.000035619625,0.00004662088,0.000014833297,0.00004410067,0.002601754,0.982495,0.01465957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010779027,0.0000041540707,0.00024213409,0.000034457793,7.6065413e-7,0.00005246835,0.0000559135,0.000009289812,0.0000218836,0.00034725745,0.99922836,0.0000022859147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100133486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2972647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19137754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01047208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108977165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6402216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922143494","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5788","title":"Advocacy in Non-Adversarial Family Law: A Recommendation for Revision to the Model Code","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Negotiation; Family law; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12062335744431228,"score_gpt":0.45620860557214055,"score_spread":0.33558524812782825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922143494","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027060194,0.00469166,0.009223219,0.9483694,0.0093810335,0.00046235343,0.000080311926,0.00023855006,0.02484741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09589474,0.015010406,0.1489831,0.67478156,0.009933787,0.0035023196,0.0006170999,0.00051403226,0.05076289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9196621,0.033222705,0.008309476,0.0041875173,0.028733676,0.0058845226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70145315,0.13919842,0.012197207,0.026348818,0.09932127,0.021481171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0956605,0.0009414451,0.0018087066,0.0036729241,0.009441639,0.019842029,0.010841503,0.033166036,0.011314085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20875879,0.0008674196,0.0033547923,0.004162317,0.040658094,0.030395266,0.010735958,0.04693011,0.004831778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007655018,0.0004095887,0.0024070605,0.0009059027,0.000027509252,0.00033124787,0.012261465,0.0005368632,0.00027687845,0.52646965,0.34507757,0.11121978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011961304,0.0001431145,0.0027496703,0.005834408,0.000057819194,0.00040934604,0.011737439,0.0009832154,0.00032134564,0.1453425,0.8320774,0.00022417866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16421787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2261327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16421787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024981463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15512203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5059071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923462742","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5691","title":"Rule 2.1 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure: Responding to Vexatious Litigation While Advancing Access to Justice?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Rule of law; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Law; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Political science; Resolution (logic); Procedural justice; American rule; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; History; Politics","score_opus":0.045308506931187854,"score_gpt":0.35854048593889065,"score_spread":0.3132319790077028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923462742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10998162,0.010714183,0.011168947,0.34029874,0.0049411706,0.00030427086,0.00050131656,0.00024080263,0.5218489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7223726,0.0060918857,0.008781821,0.09227873,0.0014714594,0.0001384293,0.000248616,0.00014161343,0.1684749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97958267,0.0018047004,0.0010102745,0.0018000328,0.011191126,0.0046112603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868624,0.0043411735,0.0015516352,0.0010455006,0.0047331434,0.0014660993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009449585,0.0002925213,0.0003474021,0.00073456165,0.008796433,0.009475852,0.002546517,0.007693543,0.0027426928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029200235,0.0005567112,0.0005209034,0.0010745202,0.01149133,0.0034159443,0.0020784885,0.0076644314,0.0006986244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079183075,0.000037152167,0.010475029,0.00024894412,0.00003556201,0.0013985898,0.0143260965,0.00084411696,0.0021360805,0.7217373,0.19131589,0.057365913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041091076,0.0000715762,0.020521307,0.0004983969,0.00004806609,0.0005195833,0.0073490636,0.0009981747,0.0015959346,0.046675265,0.9214756,0.00020593834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8822153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11778468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05034415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11231711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36527413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936011478","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5790","title":"Interrelated Treaty Orders Across the Generations: Autonomy, Obligation and Confederacy in the Wabanaki Compact (1725-26)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Obligation; Law; Autonomy; Political science; Indigenous; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.044858255266627116,"score_gpt":0.38817658836834285,"score_spread":0.3433183331017157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936011478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21531099,0.0082712835,0.0018201468,0.008240408,0.00039409785,0.000064937776,0.00004047651,0.000019433699,0.7658382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8983375,0.0012326015,0.0004422629,0.0012350325,0.000072192925,0.00004970168,0.00002481173,0.000021543878,0.098584354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987268,0.00033643018,0.00006137498,0.00020301151,0.00031282334,0.00035961135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996164,0.00014465771,0.00008915521,0.00004593297,0.000058773596,0.000045144145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013328019,0.00029961832,0.00021341941,0.0005481053,0.009308315,0.004710116,0.00067148096,0.002369005,0.0045698085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020710346,0.0003661987,0.00015601686,0.0010067736,0.011237189,0.0045430204,0.0038724854,0.0041565043,0.00044990648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021494572,0.000013669623,0.0005439221,0.000025623896,0.0000026603973,0.00048078314,0.051636294,0.000081716214,0.0003496471,0.9323249,0.0042124605,0.010306911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045375917,0.00006059982,0.012227203,0.00033746703,0.000019494824,0.00071107794,0.045490805,0.0002421486,0.00089708145,0.13384101,0.80605406,0.00007367002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07937279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13398015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07937279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009706588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004251729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1578216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947552661","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5783","title":"Upholding the Honour of the Crown","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Framing (construction); Normative; Politics; Law; Sociology; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08689514669520593,"score_gpt":0.38485570053341756,"score_spread":0.29796055383821163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947552661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08273659,0.0031129343,0.028950805,0.030811088,0.001341749,0.00012163571,0.000072638926,0.00015436066,0.85269815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95406926,0.00042427643,0.0023160754,0.0040184595,0.00031462414,0.00005291666,0.000020419584,0.00005185769,0.03873207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861602,0.0038941319,0.0005898464,0.002616575,0.00451674,0.0022225634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99023193,0.0033122315,0.0008247179,0.0023427655,0.002221672,0.0010667306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01179402,0.00028314625,0.0007248869,0.0011416483,0.008715413,0.008770728,0.0015608632,0.005455185,0.0044507263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023529286,0.00036087137,0.00047627182,0.0007754018,0.04410005,0.0077831363,0.008619585,0.00817931,0.0009649166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007881746,0.0000071798413,0.0002741256,0.000026925189,0.00000446248,0.00008214981,0.005096889,0.00008044979,0.00040179965,0.985719,0.0021108487,0.006188304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019370624,0.00009184223,0.0022000007,0.00031731758,0.000034923494,0.00035372778,0.005300121,0.0006269415,0.0013668292,0.68919694,0.30040514,0.00008689793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024899114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026395636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024899114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00677402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010865306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06237346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947763714","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5787","title":"Short Circuit: A Failing Technology for Administering Justice in Nunavut","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Arctic; Work (physics); The arctic; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Geology","score_opus":0.13040596679264843,"score_gpt":0.4492414154012963,"score_spread":0.3188354486086479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947763714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55136555,0.009288056,0.011272049,0.048094876,0.0010872562,0.00022047236,0.0003197983,0.00019064713,0.37816125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9273894,0.001738346,0.0037631886,0.002589714,0.00003123934,0.000048205646,0.000052044546,0.000065711836,0.06432216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969087,0.00090525596,0.00009993854,0.0005064888,0.0006568844,0.0009228091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978138,0.0007863591,0.00010963627,0.00017014741,0.0005719359,0.000548064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028275251,0.00023884622,0.00020984167,0.00095607614,0.031138299,0.00666649,0.001986613,0.0018659391,0.005741467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004877417,0.00038185698,0.00019377365,0.001361977,0.015395758,0.002042064,0.004282314,0.0026508523,0.0004190712],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105288396,0.000050026654,0.023204586,0.0002347068,0.000017027936,0.002726397,0.29080158,0.0010457895,0.0028543284,0.55210423,0.025052886,0.101803094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001894118,0.0000989554,0.03520351,0.0008008202,0.000043135406,0.0010455598,0.33271962,0.0010518664,0.0020994889,0.032072876,0.5945924,0.00025286985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9700659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99150544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06020595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06020595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09214118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43682683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947885322","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5786","title":"Informal Justice: An Examination of Why Ontarians Do Not Seek Legal Advice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal psychology; Adjudication; Political science; Legal culture; Legal profession; Premise; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Scholarship; Law; Legal advice; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.059316527181500094,"score_gpt":0.3957055367769666,"score_spread":0.3363890095954665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947885322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318954,0.0014738053,0.00039366347,0.022968,0.00014045899,0.000054546243,0.00009462094,0.000023670511,0.04295592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98688126,0.000941847,0.00020206465,0.004729698,0.000038927425,0.000027372884,0.000042498043,0.000019004996,0.0071173483],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924211,0.0018823753,0.0003201506,0.0004862635,0.0024680258,0.002422136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98555493,0.0056676613,0.0028065308,0.00043928623,0.002222248,0.00330925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039350186,0.00012871627,0.0003673144,0.0023783862,0.015443885,0.0065112496,0.0018440167,0.0018921808,0.006429583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01712448,0.00028573824,0.0002590125,0.0041843913,0.008943561,0.0032129881,0.006231814,0.0028687106,0.000423407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004853904,0.00021345554,0.10134502,0.00022650199,0.000019291208,0.0014338013,0.8056962,0.000028132485,0.00030457496,0.015488732,0.015658457,0.059537437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073905685,0.000039031023,0.077798165,0.00037684356,0.000011846949,0.0002854859,0.8696622,0.00008627445,0.00007916996,0.0017203643,0.049906537,0.000026631982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34143743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55676514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65856254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015354149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026580164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6789001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948412693","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5784","title":"L’accès à la justice en contexte numérique : l’information juridique par et pour les justiciables sur les médias sociaux","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10363388441470366,"score_gpt":0.4088481063230622,"score_spread":0.3052142219083585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948412693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16806503,0.014770019,0.013601527,0.075609855,0.0011536153,0.00017942609,0.0015551057,0.0002525211,0.7248129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8763541,0.010236132,0.0049199197,0.0042483485,0.00031163247,0.00015448111,0.00041875587,0.00012871364,0.10322779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952251,0.0017307203,0.00013953642,0.00041832836,0.0018179597,0.00066840847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923309,0.0025836579,0.00073915237,0.0004586172,0.0028557219,0.0010319556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029844828,0.00052053266,0.0005716207,0.0034449268,0.015206669,0.015461144,0.0014461008,0.0023009486,0.030972304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010645015,0.0003155043,0.00033462455,0.004615481,0.010350671,0.007303217,0.0054219603,0.002948706,0.0021130864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014901422,0.00008772007,0.020720366,0.00096672715,0.00005505393,0.0007503092,0.2752959,0.0006207662,0.0013037407,0.48738775,0.04639162,0.166271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015142696,0.000040642542,0.044898752,0.0020010371,0.00005342239,0.0003718487,0.12882313,0.0005881736,0.0006254672,0.01972369,0.80270743,0.00015125556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8196502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88405365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8196502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042195063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041269545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36282384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949668285","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5789","title":"Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Resolution (logic); Element (criminal law); Civil procedure; Determinative; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07811686466140803,"score_gpt":0.39798115150442565,"score_spread":0.3198642868430176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949668285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14171432,0.023155691,0.103350475,0.1781906,0.0017649772,0.001133554,0.0007972708,0.0007295213,0.5491637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7650029,0.01426809,0.08141758,0.014799795,0.00038345432,0.0002199237,0.0005972659,0.00015269173,0.123158276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98770577,0.0020728307,0.00043844615,0.000984833,0.0065567745,0.0022412858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867231,0.0031558862,0.0005905969,0.00071349595,0.006013888,0.0028029857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091347005,0.00033399474,0.00049366755,0.0022450106,0.015906861,0.0102973655,0.003460229,0.0042312597,0.009523088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022107346,0.0005575037,0.0005110019,0.003205744,0.008720646,0.0036434378,0.0070023825,0.005165795,0.0008816633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055618293,0.0001152927,0.0052212593,0.00041577476,0.000022260272,0.00091431895,0.02041078,0.0042099464,0.0010491945,0.5935508,0.064711474,0.30932334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011912331,0.00007916948,0.023263037,0.00078918005,0.000049058395,0.00029581314,0.012176341,0.007826966,0.0013162637,0.091929905,0.86196303,0.00019210161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98798275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09954683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09954683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30699953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7222662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W296552018","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4507","title":"The Deliberative City","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Zoning; Political science; Institution; Context (archaeology); Public administration; State (computer science); Foundation (evidence); Law; Law and economics; Environmental law; Action (physics); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.050480010883915086,"score_gpt":0.36581220786518404,"score_spread":0.31533219698126896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W296552018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015742766,0.0021672237,0.05813411,0.02474253,0.00032335942,0.00013984284,0.00012750283,0.0001546647,0.898468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8730735,0.0012565826,0.016914017,0.002782616,0.00021432576,0.00030941967,0.00014494776,0.00018416172,0.10512045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985268,0.008639153,0.00037382444,0.0020214522,0.0021786697,0.0015189807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99049217,0.0043411325,0.0006080741,0.0028081355,0.00084930344,0.00090119935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010708245,0.0005061289,0.00052229204,0.0018307728,0.012576023,0.013983133,0.0016305783,0.0032580085,0.016606815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011544816,0.0004274925,0.00075312384,0.0018319468,0.046987493,0.008918179,0.01375762,0.003825676,0.0022698767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026689247,0.000002889177,0.00009090316,0.000012747623,0.0000026936077,0.000017959414,0.0019977316,0.0001004308,0.000028452054,0.9941566,0.001401814,0.0021851938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009048373,0.000009077163,0.00027577946,0.0000788129,0.0000050267254,0.000051622574,0.003662951,0.00038228114,0.0001710409,0.7849075,0.21043749,0.000009386047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009467335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011345774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016606815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007812783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009972985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056685984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995072367","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6068","title":"The Global Social Enterprise Lawmaking Phenomenon: State Initiatives on Purpose, Capital, and Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Legislation; Business; State (computer science); Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Legislature; Law","score_opus":0.023531656479758394,"score_gpt":0.27072079324226034,"score_spread":0.24718913676250195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995072367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5857069,0.0072224364,0.00626178,0.06224647,0.0005862022,0.000050733866,0.0001181922,0.00008062113,0.33772677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99017733,0.0012567723,0.0006545842,0.004768177,0.00007703789,0.000020605019,0.000027469781,0.00002104033,0.0029969746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589586,0.0019176137,0.00014822592,0.00044340547,0.00077344343,0.00082144944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256694,0.0051499037,0.00079285743,0.0007471192,0.00034659926,0.00039659152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054465514,0.00018390726,0.00027306585,0.0014792088,0.006219147,0.008026522,0.00072251714,0.002297937,0.0022333486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007813485,0.00021267311,0.00042882503,0.0025167621,0.023342203,0.0067675845,0.007685862,0.0051870155,0.00011491781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010001959,0.000018443938,0.008163505,0.00005052017,0.000008180077,0.00016148674,0.043428164,0.00017169987,0.00027607408,0.92396826,0.0041280026,0.019615766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017826276,0.000092420356,0.055493183,0.0013788419,0.00007211095,0.0006687969,0.15406014,0.00096060045,0.0017862286,0.26994297,0.5154173,0.00010958444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011939354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023982983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011939354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004552737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045983465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033032596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995996282","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6066","title":"Dominium and The Empire of Laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Liberalism; Ideology; Corporate social responsibility; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Political science; Meaning (existential); Normative; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Politics; Epistemology; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023838906710334336,"score_gpt":0.2453728872747511,"score_spread":0.22153398056441675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995996282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033517968,0.009691744,0.007403367,0.051368054,0.00034757517,0.000025104126,0.00004814463,0.00007084467,0.8975272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94639885,0.002062935,0.0009797207,0.0036286921,0.00020273594,0.00004016088,0.000027678903,0.000053270527,0.04660597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657553,0.001834657,0.00007777074,0.00053477945,0.00045550612,0.0005217415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687034,0.0018890076,0.00024671547,0.0004772453,0.00028697719,0.00022973352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036543612,0.0002936034,0.00039442914,0.00121334,0.006038328,0.009024518,0.0008335456,0.0028724282,0.007924224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050624884,0.00023651478,0.00033329654,0.0008930784,0.055274013,0.0060069486,0.0042962534,0.004571967,0.0007947762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025761572,0.000002279636,0.00008559078,0.0000066803996,0.0000010407821,0.000017599501,0.00113485,0.000055187462,0.000017633052,0.9963651,0.0008804834,0.0014310034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010825217,0.000008660942,0.00035122022,0.00009920377,0.000002709571,0.000042886488,0.0012313221,0.00024438606,0.00009289047,0.83113146,0.16677679,0.000007678586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009199221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008652367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009454099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009454099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004699456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068594635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996403756","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6065","title":"Green Illusions: Governing CSR Aesthetics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Corporate governance; Corporation; Corporate branding; Aesthetics; Illusion; Public relations; Greenwashing; Salience (neuroscience); Corporate communication; Green marketing; Logos Bible Software; Phenomenon; Business; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Marketing; Law; Psychology; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01745214628211213,"score_gpt":0.2453919300888022,"score_spread":0.22793978380669006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996403756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03480819,0.002595127,0.01870956,0.033415966,0.001022971,0.00003491359,0.000024180388,0.0001455019,0.9092435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90442246,0.0013900984,0.003963825,0.006411853,0.00041167226,0.000049065406,0.000022375605,0.00026110245,0.08306755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925659,0.002974317,0.00018212463,0.0006863545,0.0026893017,0.00090214785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551976,0.0019377694,0.0004286808,0.00092184637,0.0007951615,0.0003968124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061345384,0.00052642514,0.00030488934,0.0013295384,0.009095862,0.013432128,0.0011607867,0.0032013496,0.0064097857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074227885,0.00030831457,0.0004019488,0.00092126813,0.058117602,0.010419562,0.009924121,0.007612459,0.00090961216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050279887,0.000008219673,0.00015156454,0.000014970001,0.0000012994997,0.0000544495,0.010139904,0.00011110346,0.00015364349,0.97904587,0.004176226,0.006137694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063994685,0.000013691262,0.00042147067,0.00014706179,0.000004432051,0.000109339795,0.0132094715,0.0003965238,0.0005785975,0.6583889,0.32670507,0.000019119027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068890247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012254115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013432128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063445345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004254563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046033084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996503110","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6067","title":"The Impact of Whistleblowing Awards Programs on Corporate Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Commission; Corporate governance; Harm; Accounting; Whistle blowing; Business; Control (management); Compliance (psychology); Public relations; Law; Management; Political science; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.045354078382871324,"score_gpt":0.27740253668293474,"score_spread":0.23204845830006343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996503110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.436586,0.0028154168,0.0097212875,0.033371832,0.00076016254,0.00029735424,0.00023979164,0.0002171386,0.51599103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882405,0.0005013522,0.0006637399,0.0022312046,0.00013139023,0.0000587106,0.00003563665,0.000021684837,0.00811572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632228,0.017818267,0.00086645654,0.0020073857,0.009479208,0.0066059045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91490173,0.04956169,0.012955778,0.005785983,0.009380576,0.0074142446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02317431,0.00023400437,0.0003386942,0.0017005703,0.0037486583,0.008575186,0.0011870548,0.0021000926,0.0074021313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07068285,0.00025972372,0.0005754387,0.0015389586,0.0071810824,0.003580891,0.0054132864,0.0037508956,0.0004641436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030330123,0.0013545422,0.07052001,0.00023527464,0.00017388645,0.00042873857,0.005142822,0.005718676,0.00097461726,0.67362213,0.0246563,0.21686979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005516722,0.0029147717,0.48054588,0.0015138929,0.00047200973,0.00040806286,0.014511093,0.010993783,0.0050273077,0.2887359,0.19394387,0.00038179994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026506035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047360428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026506035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073912013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010684208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12255895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996654918","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6064","title":"Introduction - Corporate Social Responsibility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Humanities; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Public relations","score_opus":0.052869145422290986,"score_gpt":0.2964087148216558,"score_spread":0.24353956939936483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996654918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078011263,0.019889897,0.0017552368,0.026921548,0.01247076,0.0000754875,0.00083005615,0.000108575194,0.93716836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02284736,0.017575812,0.0014257334,0.017260289,0.008359809,0.00012358533,0.00090258993,0.00011376421,0.93139106],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983365,0.00034459867,0.00006602175,0.00026286155,0.0008002728,0.00018980792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988167,0.00035817976,0.0000655975,0.000117807926,0.0005348725,0.00010681679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012790229,0.0006475994,0.00034988445,0.0018931869,0.0020595882,0.006109824,0.0009888663,0.0029557645,0.08906824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021241442,0.00022475942,0.0004775763,0.0019605118,0.0023781362,0.0037891779,0.0021846385,0.0038963824,0.019278023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065216764,0.000027989461,0.00019750927,0.00017091114,0.0000018177855,0.00003837915,0.0004998496,0.00008443304,0.00007907558,0.42423508,0.50995046,0.06470802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.645319e-7,0.0000040608306,0.00029472116,0.00013051371,6.3503717e-7,0.000020891992,0.0001012792,0.000011697193,0.00002116279,0.008139246,0.9912726,0.0000023639695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024985824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033370946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08906824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040399805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003290448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2979629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087131081","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6415","title":"Intersectionality: A Means for Addressing the Needs of Children with Mental Health Issues who are Engaged with the Family Law and Criminal Justice Systems?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Mental health; Intersectionality; Criminology; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Political science; Poverty; Family law; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Psychiatry; Gender studies","score_opus":0.11428662554284079,"score_gpt":0.3565692246497667,"score_spread":0.2422825991069259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087131081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33968988,0.026637223,0.025520377,0.28171104,0.0024567293,0.00053180277,0.00025090118,0.00048272475,0.32271937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90816,0.018249338,0.036461327,0.01125878,0.0005798644,0.00087533455,0.00023315345,0.00018702417,0.02399531],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935695,0.0032635052,0.00020406635,0.00040288747,0.0010534006,0.0015066259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946672,0.0012341058,0.00064772286,0.0005276856,0.00060171325,0.0023215543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008337631,0.0006790267,0.00076558586,0.003389133,0.016598828,0.015109163,0.0024601968,0.0024842694,0.0071091196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009339124,0.00068154844,0.0008008929,0.0023019428,0.018141253,0.018678153,0.03903322,0.0093251895,0.00089252327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053282743,0.00032978904,0.036468588,0.00046139315,0.000052150208,0.0013494008,0.44362172,0.00018523146,0.0007229773,0.17604458,0.039013058,0.30169785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016513104,0.00018613899,0.026134368,0.0014475527,0.000060263126,0.0016182072,0.6281207,0.00021838944,0.0005288829,0.054291632,0.28730738,0.00006990705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033033397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111031845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033033397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082854135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031186346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06568223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087164928","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6419","title":"Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Contingency; Economic Justice; Payment; Work (physics); Praise; Business; Contingency plan; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Finance; Management; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06255586856556417,"score_gpt":0.2736351138590107,"score_spread":0.21107924529344652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087164928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05859929,0.024713464,0.011376761,0.70648444,0.0030853245,0.00015988808,0.00061953464,0.00023809397,0.19472319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90887994,0.0135506345,0.0046169865,0.049048815,0.003073116,0.00011836946,0.00016905185,0.00018281078,0.020360317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914535,0.0038115673,0.00030670283,0.00058300607,0.0022318822,0.001613323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97195506,0.015498894,0.0031788158,0.0017306615,0.0024800135,0.0051565864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058446415,0.00034928307,0.00086936745,0.0014480879,0.002145304,0.012203821,0.0016527835,0.0054677003,0.024429975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054908294,0.00025312838,0.0006771539,0.0018513923,0.0087479055,0.016108261,0.005009956,0.005184578,0.002466488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031338522,0.0005168246,0.016923767,0.00075354177,0.00016250918,0.00031488267,0.0020175884,0.0020021014,0.00042722613,0.60448027,0.12191295,0.25017497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001659688,0.0004948472,0.0198727,0.0015351098,0.00017498965,0.00048295647,0.003913707,0.0031219728,0.0009012387,0.8026846,0.16652408,0.00012787385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059931213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064939614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024429975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004002617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004911207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08172643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087166589","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6421","title":"Navigating Power and Claiming Justice: Tenant Experiences at Saskatchewan’s Housing Law Tribunal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Law Foundation of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Tribunal; Landlord; Economic Justice; Inequality; Power (physics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Law; Representation (politics); Business; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.045920536984619606,"score_gpt":0.27951020931399434,"score_spread":0.23358967232937472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087166589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884632,0.00028176367,0.0004984067,0.0031665314,0.000057997793,0.000055465523,0.000038316874,0.000011510256,0.007426798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923815,0.0003690206,0.00030762967,0.0010517829,0.000011111361,0.000057952806,0.00002930015,0.000022327993,0.0057692886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906489,0.005849632,0.0001794408,0.00034847812,0.0005648464,0.0024087303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370664,0.003105789,0.00036495336,0.00017220822,0.0006760562,0.0019743168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006537862,0.0007285956,0.0008307204,0.0014453668,0.03441972,0.0072343424,0.0024422004,0.0029974196,0.006312677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007963321,0.00085474615,0.00041471364,0.0019970196,0.01888175,0.0043231156,0.010071172,0.005977655,0.0005261803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015450578,0.000025559328,0.001204966,0.000018330562,0.0000021925475,0.00084360957,0.99503857,0.00002123466,0.00035551618,0.00081562327,0.0004610362,0.0011979092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.5290893e-7,0.0000109137945,0.00031105382,0.000017562166,8.6557026e-7,0.000049149774,0.9970155,0.000018320132,0.00004345219,0.00007138521,0.0024560655,0.0000049677915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28235403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53071535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.717646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013674241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01359618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5614211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087268678","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6420","title":"Access To Justice, Moral Distance And Changing Demands On Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Solidarity; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Multiculturalism; Relation (database); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.06517805478586225,"score_gpt":0.3489909168456595,"score_spread":0.2838128620597973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087268678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36754352,0.006460462,0.008457966,0.027149405,0.00028903986,0.000030211993,0.000050604252,0.000023821718,0.5899949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936627,0.0007469436,0.00038782068,0.0004531232,0.00006158968,0.000010211566,0.000008402722,0.000008136621,0.0046610264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502134,0.0021212061,0.00018168484,0.00048637707,0.0012670824,0.00092225306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99571997,0.0024177723,0.00052273733,0.0003889043,0.00034853758,0.0006021566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030089726,0.00017684948,0.00039075137,0.0012635166,0.005388111,0.010780402,0.00086163636,0.0024172878,0.00433747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075684795,0.00015611717,0.00017701702,0.0012015519,0.042922787,0.012681745,0.008028766,0.0041362853,0.00025665015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009413653,0.000020624664,0.0006372613,0.000021572203,0.000001963601,0.00010809509,0.017078526,0.00009692234,0.00013396371,0.97534615,0.00042372892,0.006121715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008812402,0.00003808292,0.003964976,0.0001386193,0.0000036852332,0.00022449937,0.030985713,0.00029414578,0.00015101323,0.916793,0.047374267,0.000023249226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005158311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005164847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010780402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004143675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002597751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030064583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087291905","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6418","title":"Legal Technology and the Future of Women in Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Promotion (chess); Practice of law; Legal process; Productivity; Public relations; Equal employment opportunity; Work (physics); Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.029694280019558206,"score_gpt":0.3563620919052209,"score_spread":0.3266678118856627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087291905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17627065,0.031572178,0.0022900521,0.47918612,0.0017579339,0.000040655505,0.00012382797,0.000050239007,0.3087084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88032913,0.012722973,0.0008097037,0.028783951,0.0012508687,0.000044747376,0.000044671993,0.000042851832,0.075971134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601847,0.0016294463,0.000077743134,0.0003295921,0.00057267555,0.0013721111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469155,0.0020392356,0.0006756519,0.00017888281,0.0005037866,0.0019108914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058351513,0.00020018937,0.00032419284,0.0015612384,0.010758924,0.012521078,0.00084054127,0.0038497145,0.019296095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065561384,0.00024516205,0.00029537978,0.0014001102,0.017428147,0.010548021,0.0065640723,0.0038615507,0.002278009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007204738,0.00016261495,0.015838085,0.00012713681,0.0000077467175,0.0007392745,0.15974583,0.00010883447,0.0005712828,0.67127,0.031747397,0.11960984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014593793,0.00011655304,0.0084372675,0.0005997632,0.0000065416907,0.000520736,0.10186167,0.0001873713,0.00027744606,0.100744076,0.78718954,0.000044380315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008967303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013666132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019296095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048044897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005324952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06455183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087305695","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6422","title":"L’égalité réelle et la mise en œuvre intégrale du principe de Jordan","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06779033886164633,"score_gpt":0.37026656208854286,"score_spread":0.30247622322689655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087305695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17992634,0.019487754,0.014625946,0.1186584,0.0025804746,0.0002124519,0.00022603181,0.00012836882,0.66415423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66810244,0.013956392,0.011026591,0.017898992,0.00046514708,0.00014591735,0.00016270467,0.00015926396,0.2880826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363434,0.0024155332,0.0002495629,0.0005356797,0.002047184,0.0011176753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953815,0.0006215784,0.00043095244,0.00023240359,0.002430326,0.00090320525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00805406,0.0004683957,0.00034805684,0.0010650748,0.015006837,0.009712799,0.0013992139,0.0023639705,0.010418687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075939614,0.0003181709,0.0004336869,0.0011945918,0.012056637,0.004158455,0.0063293264,0.0047703255,0.0015102517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009562942,0.00009592618,0.012668362,0.00040490826,0.000047505386,0.000837223,0.12824315,0.00070842885,0.0009694744,0.7334772,0.0408685,0.08158377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012766269,0.00006080122,0.005389547,0.0005792548,0.00001611161,0.0002663734,0.06397594,0.00026313702,0.00079900015,0.025438104,0.9031528,0.00004619306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18136704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32358855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021138206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050846227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3606227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087416689","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6416","title":"Discrimination and the Private Law in Canada: Reflections on Spence v. BMO Trust Co.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Law; Legislation; Political science; Sexual orientation; Testamentary trust; Multiculturalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.09651350401140332,"score_gpt":0.3755349907071687,"score_spread":0.27902148669576543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087416689","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042658437,0.045591768,0.00071688,0.71438086,0.0032852488,0.00016151596,0.00061238074,0.00004139434,0.19255154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44103968,0.034523383,0.0018450131,0.40489426,0.0013344733,0.0001371837,0.00023017828,0.00010074645,0.11589519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892771,0.0010449041,0.00025879525,0.0008863792,0.004377791,0.0041550435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921721,0.002568446,0.00032073486,0.00013767956,0.0027516987,0.0020493048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004783453,0.00052791275,0.00060046517,0.0026665537,0.050592903,0.012800113,0.003522056,0.016548777,0.0055811163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008603224,0.00083445833,0.00091110234,0.0039802296,0.019371789,0.004301822,0.004148709,0.015061426,0.00033214447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047491474,0.000098774224,0.004288661,0.0002492318,0.00003399894,0.0017128421,0.0332782,0.000585857,0.0005430195,0.6470475,0.2895603,0.022554126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058444646,0.00004892449,0.015993912,0.00095827517,0.000083630475,0.00035689023,0.034950536,0.0008260859,0.0004888792,0.02809508,0.9178148,0.00032442185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99823076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99927455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2588017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2588017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36987317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85968494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087445873","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6431","title":"Caught By Private Law: A Review Of Visitors’ Jurisdiction In Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Appeal; Visitor pattern; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Private law; Sociology; Comparative law; Business","score_opus":0.0639248299723872,"score_gpt":0.41718536120011396,"score_spread":0.35326053122772677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087445873","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022771294,0.9968843,0.000019976183,0.0007700499,0.00008460397,0.000006731949,0.000029894518,0.0000016518399,0.0019750244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040378454,0.9951068,0.000045296372,0.00051863503,0.00005241663,0.000005462027,0.000026199708,0.0000019299034,0.00020548185],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967507,0.0005678179,0.00024931564,0.00024828964,0.0018291136,0.00035481463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99088883,0.0045034057,0.00068844896,0.0001398597,0.0031955924,0.0005838721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00464953,0.0005847597,0.0016299876,0.007691617,0.002243993,0.0042310106,0.0016758213,0.0017228264,0.0034666457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011115255,0.0005135493,0.00080861663,0.018896,0.0045530675,0.001991443,0.0014779437,0.0023231802,0.00030749437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011589549,0.000059992788,0.001540231,0.060841147,0.00029589757,0.000250308,0.0019733438,0.00046871963,0.00018239615,0.03488785,0.085978314,0.8134058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026336795,0.00005787073,0.009091286,0.062917046,0.0004325219,0.00031046534,0.0013488728,0.00009751833,0.00011110688,0.0019534838,0.9235979,0.000055641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83335626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92148906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16664374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04089977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116072476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33525026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087739257","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6424","title":"The Prospects for Customary Law in Transitional Justice: The Case of Fiji","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Customary international law; Human rights; Sociology; International law; Public international law","score_opus":0.04867721321077983,"score_gpt":0.3404110656836142,"score_spread":0.29173385247283434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087739257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53782827,0.0052953437,0.0018947102,0.080382995,0.00017116399,0.00008627926,0.000040546365,0.000020090214,0.37428054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98857236,0.0009589811,0.00039394526,0.0042644055,0.000036446003,0.000042919444,0.0000066932794,0.0000044269336,0.00571978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964868,0.0015193353,0.00005760263,0.00015751085,0.00022588998,0.0015528878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973447,0.001578957,0.00030064478,0.00019832842,0.00020797111,0.00036949024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059920736,0.00022686204,0.00024561945,0.0010761325,0.022480188,0.007125614,0.0013426853,0.006388221,0.004096099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055131996,0.000276366,0.00044099515,0.0012492826,0.035112556,0.008090247,0.008715482,0.006944575,0.00017961462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024955394,0.000060526665,0.0046074656,0.000081405204,0.0000081126545,0.003019053,0.07756515,0.00020047968,0.00024527212,0.8982963,0.0035727627,0.012318565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007903146,0.00021884349,0.052205782,0.0019775727,0.00010264396,0.003648933,0.32667553,0.002106778,0.000804904,0.30913076,0.30280313,0.00024607932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11559073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18837376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11559073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01069621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0082133785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22983581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310680922","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4563","title":"Reimagining Haj Khalil v. Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Geography; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.04375297097071363,"score_gpt":0.3320573126985284,"score_spread":0.2883043417278148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310680922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20921701,0.010368406,0.0020037757,0.19141814,0.0008706623,0.0000931361,0.0004086889,0.000071000446,0.5855492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157248,0.002879972,0.000508146,0.018310843,0.00011455524,0.000016316952,0.00005563152,0.000031773245,0.062357925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426264,0.00054466305,0.0000826114,0.00041863325,0.002172542,0.0025188723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967919,0.0012523781,0.000163343,0.000108607834,0.001141988,0.00054165407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003297076,0.00028323507,0.00037916435,0.0011445169,0.036433864,0.009739903,0.0019213303,0.0057031834,0.004554963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067497706,0.000391168,0.00035632207,0.0014973867,0.013559355,0.0029784404,0.0038863313,0.007114129,0.00025310184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032949247,0.000021198963,0.0035739648,0.000074157666,0.000017290346,0.0012288541,0.053368106,0.0003009022,0.00041071148,0.8759319,0.045448896,0.019591175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029055847,0.000042413838,0.016556708,0.0004469397,0.00009772618,0.00039808924,0.0723318,0.0009682392,0.0014796609,0.07264975,0.8348083,0.00019131193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98970896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110551305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110551305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18057741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8021096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111152607","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6560","title":"A Former Crown’s Vision for Empowering Survivors of Sexual Violence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Harm; Sexual violence; Criminal justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Charter; Political science; Psychology; Empowerment; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.052996586962715274,"score_gpt":0.3781106619315982,"score_spread":0.32511407496888295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111152607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01998305,0.060050517,0.0055333795,0.48214188,0.016697243,0.000292639,0.0013291569,0.0004897776,0.41348246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19091378,0.090013795,0.014518903,0.04548161,0.0027718507,0.0001552139,0.0010515914,0.00033960742,0.65475357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790156,0.00027666372,0.000052669322,0.00011205933,0.0011670304,0.00049000763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959746,0.00017875622,0.000115335904,0.00022412116,0.0013400523,0.0021671636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018588038,0.00041433272,0.00022726342,0.0015818735,0.0068803267,0.005681167,0.0015336922,0.0023903127,0.013567547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042128307,0.00021556597,0.0004274933,0.0016809602,0.005448073,0.003521872,0.0038199262,0.0041003674,0.0018279682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025002315,0.00005709033,0.0031045575,0.00025223207,0.000010154615,0.0001395242,0.0039060249,0.00020366641,0.0002797744,0.13811433,0.6338204,0.22008727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003933712,0.000026743399,0.0023654113,0.0002555208,0.000007366256,0.00016296102,0.0020177143,0.000049896204,0.000109075045,0.005406869,0.98958206,0.0000125140505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80272967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8929602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80272967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020693952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08670802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39686418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111204796","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6562","title":"\"Backpack Refugee Rights Advocating\" in Greece – Access to Justice through Legal Empowerment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Empowerment; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.10180932544928184,"score_gpt":0.3932704635690226,"score_spread":0.2914611381197408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111204796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26238146,0.027289886,0.005647918,0.19208097,0.0025508634,0.0002748283,0.00009867152,0.00016614424,0.5095093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88811445,0.009411472,0.0029083497,0.013246274,0.00029452675,0.000098488556,0.00004915665,0.00006121834,0.08581607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967429,0.0019255477,0.00013874398,0.00026484107,0.00041409413,0.0005138021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979698,0.0009270691,0.00022622077,0.00022009744,0.00016024543,0.00049648277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043310435,0.00025682247,0.00031118613,0.0015484073,0.0046092,0.0060756616,0.00083541975,0.0031680579,0.0059561376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050970754,0.0001887987,0.0003180705,0.0011711713,0.019632561,0.005379552,0.011451596,0.0033462876,0.0007163576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003188401,0.000093044684,0.002533913,0.00041321677,0.00001067043,0.0020972195,0.12809737,0.00028569496,0.00068153726,0.71029544,0.022190513,0.13326956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027133257,0.00007802839,0.004055998,0.0010342384,0.0000080834825,0.0011274284,0.07089551,0.00019986357,0.00057605054,0.11434699,0.8076137,0.0000371087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005044416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060756616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004139867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008760572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030036986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112042609","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6563","title":"Making Time for Critique: Canadian ‘Right to Shelter’ Debates in a Chrono-Political Frame","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Politics; Sociology; Expansive; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06046793786869481,"score_gpt":0.38830300266020473,"score_spread":0.3278350647915099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112042609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030172002,0.021775007,0.0037764425,0.43682474,0.0036559121,0.000058513557,0.00018945451,0.000084387546,0.50346357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8325057,0.0073434943,0.003725376,0.07648975,0.0010078531,0.00008891139,0.00010682765,0.00021639954,0.07851573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785297,0.005569329,0.0003611285,0.0019182134,0.008790617,0.0048310785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860815,0.006915139,0.0005608064,0.00053441763,0.0038739361,0.0020341836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015026028,0.0009050041,0.0010115495,0.0041279006,0.06673508,0.030215451,0.005342987,0.016409842,0.00971474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024017233,0.0006325186,0.000821103,0.0067050196,0.07338949,0.009600802,0.008597991,0.016261771,0.000683099],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014397183,0.0000079006,0.0001923194,0.000071419316,0.0000050958815,0.0002113219,0.06890293,0.00013310122,0.00008894129,0.8937444,0.032209206,0.0044189594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016113163,0.000007708805,0.000997703,0.0004417635,0.000015918515,0.00009813217,0.07089701,0.00028459547,0.00015470621,0.08353503,0.843468,0.00008323081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96741253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97609293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2293514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2293514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20241119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8938432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112230220","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6565","title":"Litigating in the Time of Coronavirus: Mental Health Tribunals’ Response to COVID-19","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Harm; Pandemic; Economic Justice; Criminology; Addiction; Psychiatry; Population; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.21238391608874727,"score_gpt":0.5180733425135365,"score_spread":0.30568942642478925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112230220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4065371,0.003335933,0.002858442,0.42850536,0.0029745765,0.00052888994,0.00020171043,0.00006385654,0.15499417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8260875,0.001193646,0.0012080607,0.09889694,0.0005682184,0.00014221793,0.0000902181,0.000055377477,0.07175771],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860284,0.0032175672,0.0005892528,0.0009332563,0.0035826124,0.0056489697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983125,0.0069533987,0.001205945,0.00069399294,0.0033728462,0.0046488624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016120162,0.00023460375,0.00034465827,0.00068905775,0.03405,0.010686657,0.0023001046,0.009285837,0.005735215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038049262,0.0006132582,0.0005953562,0.00059013785,0.012237061,0.003589391,0.008618827,0.014854464,0.0006088034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014507088,0.0002148567,0.053304642,0.00021637403,0.0000678928,0.018155873,0.36636183,0.0006157254,0.0047486713,0.22794639,0.27660006,0.051622663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003614967,0.00014713753,0.0610104,0.0004372774,0.000032930948,0.0015179899,0.26165408,0.0007962225,0.0012438651,0.012542219,0.6603993,0.00018241964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54403234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78036886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54403234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042323317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05369403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9173059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112273460","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6561","title":"The 2010 Amendments and Hryniak v Mauldin: The Perspective of the Lawyers Who Have Lived Them","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Perception; Psychology; History; Art","score_opus":0.12529564303135415,"score_gpt":0.399644406971222,"score_spread":0.27434876393986785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112273460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.853337,0.0039617526,0.00015020125,0.10491829,0.00024345242,0.000025972118,0.00006239015,0.000010565191,0.03729039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623401,0.0021070365,0.00009448234,0.021398505,0.000079308404,0.000017303453,0.000027035125,0.000011300072,0.013925035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323905,0.0021666158,0.00020582134,0.00036807873,0.0011816147,0.0028388086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99023706,0.004006631,0.0017653949,0.00015365254,0.00092230533,0.0029149875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042443355,0.00015241462,0.0003123301,0.0004774079,0.020949282,0.0071788835,0.0011429121,0.0049867183,0.0039720605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016501233,0.00035676328,0.00020329085,0.001037599,0.011130706,0.0033016033,0.0036994219,0.0071298694,0.00034047075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007949843,0.0002570596,0.053312317,0.0001101661,0.00001582337,0.0036718268,0.8655784,0.00010762314,0.001139078,0.018067399,0.031941384,0.025719367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009055745,0.00009293118,0.03035913,0.000178757,0.000009063876,0.0006905914,0.82191813,0.000037723996,0.00024771606,0.0009450236,0.14547467,0.00003721381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38573328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68604237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38573328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025283543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023802143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7669761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113038015","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6564","title":"Effectuating Change: A Tool Box of Strategies for Reducing the Unnecessary Use of Administrative Court Orders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fulbright Canada; Law Foundation of British Columbia; University of Arizona","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Alienation; Indigenous; Political science; Economic Justice; Interim; Autonomy; Criminal justice; Witness; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.22561869347402994,"score_gpt":0.4139003082026126,"score_spread":0.18828161472858265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113038015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06447859,0.006652308,0.36545593,0.14441103,0.0022908214,0.0027825332,0.00012969268,0.002934555,0.4108645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7141659,0.0042232354,0.22544968,0.015727367,0.00048435893,0.0018033218,0.00007749469,0.00048031076,0.037588324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861326,0.008343163,0.00042336714,0.0010569446,0.0028798573,0.001164067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867409,0.0074637504,0.0011414328,0.0024602006,0.0012323143,0.0009614293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010886846,0.0010107986,0.0004517669,0.0030426148,0.0067585865,0.010091682,0.003068047,0.0040881126,0.009769016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02650109,0.00036219743,0.0007065793,0.0013937585,0.016767887,0.009394791,0.007018877,0.0046565686,0.0014534931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005604262,0.0005783307,0.0021044463,0.00048350592,0.0000357192,0.00030229712,0.017267665,0.0020632714,0.0017131453,0.56782466,0.030038621,0.37753233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019254062,0.00083875825,0.0046393867,0.0017900353,0.00008159921,0.00046783,0.03665931,0.0037497731,0.004594776,0.4041857,0.5426114,0.00018880585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035912604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064338855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010886846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046232534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013706292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057575822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121174463","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4363","title":"LAWYERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE FAIRNESS OF JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Psychology; Helpfulness; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06152644705459672,"score_gpt":0.4113544472456721,"score_spread":0.3498280001910754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121174463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871904,0.00025003403,0.0004802187,0.0027259665,0.00002438318,0.000037801692,0.000009192762,0.0000061981054,0.0092758695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998803,0.00011384146,0.00015580583,0.0003183192,0.00001569228,0.000009579938,0.000005298946,0.0000021635292,0.0005763183],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97312826,0.014305025,0.0014027464,0.0010453106,0.0071389377,0.0029797931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9289958,0.03814278,0.01651287,0.0020740412,0.008540112,0.005734448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02326722,0.00019952357,0.0004164548,0.0021542443,0.005411433,0.005794244,0.0009832802,0.0023314827,0.0031134095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118874766,0.00036305463,0.00033468226,0.0010463763,0.0070093223,0.0021885347,0.0028218895,0.002230455,0.0002390214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071338867,0.00066651887,0.22704111,0.0002056092,0.00012970305,0.0017125711,0.6917379,0.0009263764,0.0041057104,0.011606936,0.0037070627,0.05744722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023532666,0.00089483836,0.31472725,0.00046228417,0.00012433516,0.001067103,0.641876,0.0026165892,0.0010152736,0.008168627,0.028584361,0.00022802138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07881059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09524815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07881059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009080771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008388569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15670371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121435143","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4318","title":"SEX WORK, LAW, AND VIOLENCE: BEDFORD V. CANADA AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEX WORKERS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex work; Sex workers; Human rights; Political science; Law; Work (physics); Criminology; Sociology; Humanities; Engineering; Demography; Biology; Philosophy; Virology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","score_opus":0.013696655953237758,"score_gpt":0.2823445126062222,"score_spread":0.2686478566529844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121435143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14780368,0.05596785,0.0015963604,0.52521986,0.0015818187,0.00013989653,0.000543047,0.000049658705,0.26709786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79212546,0.012100571,0.0009095595,0.14602825,0.00035286325,0.00009417654,0.00010786709,0.000041173338,0.048240073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934673,0.0011603663,0.00012141536,0.0005161203,0.0019230497,0.0028118438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954705,0.0021358312,0.00033545305,0.00011801182,0.0008151704,0.0011250747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004313174,0.0004560552,0.00043651595,0.0015659878,0.039221495,0.01055153,0.0037215406,0.014533824,0.0040548653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007018199,0.00064138643,0.00056946644,0.002568266,0.030165877,0.0037796681,0.0035513937,0.011407326,0.00019523766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006245668,0.00005833641,0.0074424483,0.000155278,0.00002969108,0.0011522407,0.06995213,0.00033308883,0.00044256233,0.8306727,0.07330569,0.016393472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012534064,0.00009355262,0.05009102,0.0016896056,0.0001448518,0.00048922474,0.12526985,0.0011585399,0.0010145772,0.10830221,0.7110983,0.00052289176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99595547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13976447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13976447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17789353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121872600","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4504","title":"Reinventing Regulation/Reinventing Accountability: Judicial Review in New Governance Regimes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Political science; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Humanities; Law; Sociology; Management; Social science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03608679849214246,"score_gpt":0.2947580506306005,"score_spread":0.25867125213845804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121872600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082348146,0.059248343,0.14558704,0.34536612,0.0038251972,0.00032636977,0.000057645633,0.00030370615,0.36293745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91751117,0.010818838,0.022609077,0.030116023,0.0046690092,0.0003499533,0.000030502035,0.000083650106,0.013811808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89927906,0.060606003,0.0054069003,0.0074941735,0.020921437,0.006292544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82762676,0.1391813,0.009041929,0.0103092175,0.010941866,0.0028989103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09009331,0.00029143313,0.0010840059,0.0027077186,0.0068521188,0.020012511,0.0028238613,0.012553286,0.0020566091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107997686,0.00092972687,0.00086780736,0.0016575222,0.03331997,0.020193398,0.0074345353,0.010239494,0.00041002472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015374186,0.000025599056,0.00056081516,0.000080442034,0.000011480575,0.00018711951,0.0020889575,0.0008032272,0.00021838112,0.965393,0.0053619305,0.025253668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008869129,0.00010410211,0.0017043349,0.0009249718,0.00003269592,0.0002753896,0.0018961244,0.002743772,0.00087757333,0.82067835,0.17056672,0.000107278094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043148478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075760116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09009331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008728993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019075215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47646463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122075567","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4847","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND ABUSES OF CONTRACT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Boilerplate text; Economic Justice; Political science; Enforcement; Democracy; Law; Normative; Law and economics; Rule of law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.09363396427763256,"score_gpt":0.4105117213857557,"score_spread":0.31687775710812316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122075567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07064587,0.006550841,0.005177664,0.021637052,0.00025329733,0.000041848005,0.00008882368,0.000036347014,0.8955682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95826787,0.002774465,0.0006485921,0.0036411807,0.0002131111,0.000049165737,0.000043107655,0.000037111608,0.03432536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837931,0.0051846053,0.0007159659,0.0014166988,0.005167385,0.0037222723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935366,0.0049176,0.0008286062,0.0021893007,0.001709271,0.0010015365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007968208,0.00026636408,0.00052949466,0.0023887712,0.011725826,0.011674008,0.0012641215,0.004533387,0.01123445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019678544,0.00036998393,0.00043303685,0.0025349895,0.056606557,0.009849484,0.011187379,0.006393338,0.0006806471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049645623,0.000007530451,0.00041052807,0.000008489304,0.0000023253417,0.00008773501,0.0056248624,0.000052265314,0.00003061352,0.98589164,0.002118487,0.0057604713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143564475,0.000022145063,0.0030300254,0.00047071234,0.000013317098,0.00042161858,0.009684045,0.00039756618,0.00018950902,0.7940512,0.19167338,0.000032205517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09348673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072796926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09348673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014954558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011271498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18588513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122173365","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4537","title":"Listening to Their Voices: Women Prisoners and Access to Justice in Manitoba","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Active listening; Economic Justice; Legislature; Accountability; Political science; Compliance (psychology); Law; State (computer science); Public administration; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06436131248664645,"score_gpt":0.3429993511478677,"score_spread":0.2786380386612213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122173365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683556,0.002729087,0.00007209752,0.0175513,0.0001265853,0.000041562344,0.00006696072,0.000008817661,0.011047951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987483,0.0033243112,0.00014123823,0.002271102,0.00003758123,0.000036663256,0.000028003129,0.000009738617,0.006668269],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827564,0.00064193073,0.00003998942,0.00007285056,0.00016411945,0.0008054803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979905,0.0005789052,0.00022741454,0.00003901758,0.0002996383,0.0008644121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018776684,0.00038708976,0.00041700262,0.0012664819,0.023742398,0.005523413,0.0015753509,0.0018940477,0.0048249983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040498385,0.00049332157,0.0002667753,0.0021312574,0.008307556,0.0019452735,0.005742188,0.0027789753,0.00026343868],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018273327,0.00002925767,0.016874395,0.00006556535,0.000004979876,0.00090152415,0.9732963,0.000010989261,0.00032410084,0.001347746,0.0013505252,0.005776419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014229083,0.000013635354,0.010663478,0.00008178428,0.000004633544,0.000107153646,0.98482424,0.000008265868,0.0000343478,0.00009626384,0.0041587125,0.000006050011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83417094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9381929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16582906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019191671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032049485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3336113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122188266","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4419","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR ALL: TOWARDS AN “EXPANSIVE VISION” OF JUSTICE AND TECHNOLOGY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Economic Justice; Deliverable; Software deployment; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.07498148193957802,"score_gpt":0.4503946477101648,"score_spread":0.3754131657705868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122188266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020771397,0.031137833,0.048341915,0.39645907,0.002036773,0.00015433136,0.000109488166,0.00016922719,0.50082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.870535,0.019946339,0.023533674,0.049872234,0.0010312767,0.0002326892,0.00009565287,0.00016823325,0.03458473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769323,0.00805008,0.00058217184,0.0016693689,0.008893669,0.0038723939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98681355,0.0057961335,0.0006380792,0.0010537875,0.0035822284,0.0021162487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017615221,0.0014653312,0.0010456517,0.0068313335,0.02380086,0.03777774,0.0041524936,0.0120161995,0.0035672516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014762199,0.00061169115,0.0008171308,0.0046556117,0.14477582,0.029491853,0.02064151,0.018750826,0.0004052327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003605846,0.0000064879982,0.0001348206,0.000050114024,0.0000029231626,0.00005728853,0.013927626,0.00013600466,0.00007988869,0.9764971,0.003181839,0.005922192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007004229,0.000029474342,0.0011803873,0.0008936347,0.00001831097,0.00020188336,0.041700922,0.0005527934,0.00037283605,0.567416,0.38753974,0.000086899905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61506134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6076134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61506134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088615105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09164573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77441126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122262214","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4521","title":"PROCESS MATTERS - EMPIRICALLY EVALUATING ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS IN THE HEALTH SECTOR: THE QUESTIONABLE NEUTRALITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PROCESS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4683178040571181,"score_gpt":0.6010075371042747,"score_spread":0.1326897330471566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122262214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94593626,0.00086786214,0.0054281238,0.00484844,0.00008696422,0.00047836168,0.000074344585,0.000010747597,0.042268906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981806,0.00011018282,0.0005556264,0.00029075716,0.00003777287,0.000092034854,0.000018631248,0.0000038549383,0.0007106293],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9180366,0.04840068,0.0043386687,0.0050813654,0.01869276,0.0054499004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5440098,0.3651056,0.04807321,0.009535679,0.027305188,0.0059705516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10485634,0.00023742147,0.00066784257,0.003816745,0.005894468,0.012612354,0.0022002147,0.003354555,0.0045182477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34752566,0.00033537747,0.0006900175,0.0027557923,0.011428667,0.013768254,0.0050303345,0.004208836,0.000665813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009937981,0.00250423,0.40896544,0.0010142296,0.0003831194,0.0023195376,0.13280044,0.00927446,0.0026424841,0.29004598,0.0061874487,0.14286888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028086535,0.0039328006,0.50741714,0.0013188367,0.0003178772,0.0007653659,0.2745821,0.015295553,0.0046635736,0.14695156,0.044162504,0.00031179134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068357126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008751706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10485634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009659747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012660454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122308799","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4360","title":"THE “NAKED FACE” OF SECULAR EXCLUSION: BILL 94 AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF BELIEF","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02899525982252284,"score_gpt":0.3223177436575149,"score_spread":0.2933224838349921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122308799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32275522,0.0015346627,0.00716879,0.09757725,0.00036144114,0.00015615509,0.00011154155,0.000065015214,0.5702699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539973,0.00024728125,0.000629244,0.0099186385,0.000049179926,0.0000691944,0.000018808621,0.000025127561,0.03504534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894907,0.004154443,0.00013635865,0.00067122304,0.0018592251,0.0036880865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476165,0.0024007978,0.0004431506,0.0004890263,0.001122304,0.00078309857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075941733,0.00034328608,0.0004139987,0.00069194136,0.03245955,0.012605016,0.0021268001,0.0076313433,0.00608803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072830077,0.00040937992,0.0006208074,0.0009781995,0.053066388,0.004837185,0.0062664836,0.010016204,0.00041350606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022691283,0.00003972601,0.0026966773,0.000030331676,0.000006560623,0.0013227129,0.08387322,0.00031322573,0.00032432342,0.8973834,0.008695729,0.0052914214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068993126,0.000106027364,0.0130137745,0.00069453096,0.000047008274,0.0010268452,0.2796642,0.002037317,0.00102016,0.09019573,0.611947,0.00017836792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8820003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90659153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11799967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076197766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057499547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5528561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122347404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4372","title":"OPPORTUNITY LOST: THE SUPREME COURT MISSES A HISTORIC CHANCE TO CONSIDER QUESTION OF PUBLIC INTEREST STANDING FOR ANIMAL INTERESTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Humanities; Intervention (counseling); Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.2804840550246441,"score_gpt":0.4300931352395599,"score_spread":0.1496090802149158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122347404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020919817,0.010615237,0.0054402957,0.7475922,0.0033567068,0.000019613117,0.00008759011,0.000052271927,0.21191627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70942426,0.004919113,0.0017373702,0.22904523,0.003955475,0.00004061389,0.00006682771,0.000099324134,0.050711744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99313813,0.0015908023,0.00013460807,0.0007217453,0.0022715956,0.0021430699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395025,0.0034244445,0.00024154012,0.00032733523,0.0010133176,0.0010430886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007888509,0.0003017172,0.0006699229,0.0010997164,0.016841376,0.018778248,0.002510226,0.01633334,0.0045150598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0153151825,0.00042206727,0.0005483551,0.0009286348,0.047594573,0.010364712,0.005474986,0.034458037,0.0005252826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007835402,0.0000088356455,0.00021491392,0.000012222458,0.00000507782,0.00023887558,0.0028929044,0.000088690394,0.000094237264,0.9568927,0.033934668,0.0056090336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020370917,0.000023480881,0.0008283926,0.00026664775,0.0000192075,0.00018239686,0.0081997495,0.00024711288,0.00023638555,0.58477795,0.40513453,0.000063829364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2720006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42202014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7279994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023617782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033692453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5408348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122700238","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4480","title":"Dizzying Dialogue: Canadian Courts and the Continuing Justification of the Dispossession Of Aboriginal People","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Doctrine; Supreme court; Conciliation; Law; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Arbitration","score_opus":0.03848112590642711,"score_gpt":0.3252010623644886,"score_spread":0.2867199364580615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122700238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0686563,0.027398163,0.002388411,0.28452295,0.0011196868,0.000047461002,0.00016934794,0.0000580605,0.6156396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9222372,0.0073044095,0.0014393101,0.026521258,0.0003485924,0.000036140336,0.000058125832,0.000055923912,0.041998938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878007,0.0029817917,0.00020979372,0.001037733,0.0046772575,0.0032927422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98749965,0.00620596,0.00039621993,0.00043164278,0.004316025,0.0011505168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008994957,0.0004341562,0.0007050564,0.0028114202,0.055706225,0.020722242,0.0040987944,0.0105712265,0.0055595944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022597626,0.00042824377,0.00048822345,0.004149007,0.045899037,0.0059969975,0.0068794303,0.010940418,0.00028470816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012007574,0.0000069501666,0.00049339153,0.000034829034,0.000006434121,0.0002542572,0.042598695,0.00012715085,0.000074948206,0.92396754,0.024474612,0.007949258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050505638,0.000015887183,0.0046935156,0.0007503182,0.000064755965,0.00021191961,0.07685882,0.0010321,0.00035007042,0.27050415,0.64532316,0.00014478562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8266674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17333256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19676116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95881706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123338612","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485","title":"Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fisheries Joint Management Committee","keywords":"Rulemaking; Agency (philosophy); Negotiation; Corporate governance; Political science; Stakeholder; Public administration; Citizen journalism; Democracy; Sociology; Business; Humanities; Management; Public relations; Law; Politics; Economics; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16611613317726218,"score_gpt":0.39197966032717413,"score_spread":0.22586352714991195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123338612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8048031,0.00041606944,0.056951683,0.004067023,0.00008333281,0.0010099878,0.00009133764,0.000034809254,0.13254268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898336,0.00009142082,0.008070119,0.000117421034,0.000009871801,0.00035768643,0.000032353946,0.000011043731,0.0014763582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8045724,0.15196325,0.008345176,0.0066083767,0.02217564,0.0063351905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7703655,0.16591959,0.025314404,0.016528362,0.017772892,0.004099277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.114900276,0.000433416,0.0007777157,0.0032610479,0.008595123,0.015928553,0.0018423419,0.0026074166,0.0020689454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1402756,0.00053006725,0.0006850737,0.0032920546,0.015350501,0.011068888,0.012743599,0.0026616289,0.00030081478],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048089374,0.0005549493,0.12028727,0.0005335745,0.00019794819,0.0008129951,0.34065136,0.009494747,0.0019245455,0.39083958,0.0018277847,0.13239439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009667197,0.0006059587,0.0773613,0.0010448894,0.00013755079,0.00048876635,0.4862322,0.020832298,0.0053492193,0.34382525,0.063805,0.00022098265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009799642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011771201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114900276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008474844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013753176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.607658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123523432","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4498","title":"NEITHER FISH NOR FOWL: ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES IN THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Adjudication; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Accountability; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Politics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.10596558408195621,"score_gpt":0.31663987585797604,"score_spread":0.21067429177601982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123523432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06783969,0.020865489,0.011501295,0.23623283,0.0020127955,0.00004293844,0.00010707766,0.00006491307,0.6613331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86692524,0.007198367,0.0030454404,0.026584385,0.0018578573,0.00006940515,0.000047546993,0.000062016756,0.0942097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552995,0.0019280416,0.00014177656,0.0006467378,0.0010248172,0.00072871195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953578,0.002521743,0.0004021543,0.00042826682,0.0008313305,0.00045876225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069154575,0.0001282397,0.00028154833,0.001084152,0.008577542,0.009609271,0.0007085709,0.0043964107,0.0065899966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014072985,0.00041638772,0.00025448448,0.0011669041,0.02088993,0.012460861,0.002849759,0.0067586154,0.0011158219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000763014,0.000005544521,0.0005459587,0.000008531947,0.000001413817,0.000018760828,0.001629976,0.00005484759,0.00003156988,0.9800496,0.010783701,0.0068624387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022676302,0.000040835916,0.0025113295,0.0002068693,0.000010270686,0.000065014836,0.0030235632,0.0003981734,0.00016990904,0.48338854,0.5101196,0.000043245578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040323265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06786304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040323265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008228093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077845315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08017713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123586893","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4566","title":"India Sinking: Threats to the Right to Food, Food Security & Development, in an Era of Economic Growth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foundation for Research, Science and Technology","keywords":"Food security; Right to food; Poverty; Development economics; Economic growth; State (computer science); Agriculture; Political science; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.05217552426609419,"score_gpt":0.3305887104590601,"score_spread":0.2784131861929659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123586893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0525782,0.03397867,0.0021909995,0.1896355,0.002875874,0.00004816766,0.0003261256,0.00030666162,0.7180597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7149655,0.041821774,0.0030961533,0.060463153,0.0012324188,0.00007648165,0.00039925627,0.00014357964,0.17780168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988312,0.00024130265,0.000042472995,0.00010518384,0.00041034364,0.00036946477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992924,0.0002560123,0.00010554407,0.00007492351,0.00013255286,0.000138488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073807884,0.00038657754,0.00021215666,0.0008831612,0.005871052,0.009418247,0.00074527715,0.0022045812,0.0064910054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011605644,0.00023342678,0.0003519189,0.0014170712,0.0061133583,0.0028358232,0.00464161,0.006517585,0.0017718999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000492372,0.00005906255,0.005826666,0.0005138537,0.000015698404,0.0026254114,0.01917545,0.00037817738,0.0027046367,0.6697978,0.18567662,0.11317741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003867674,0.000028747962,0.006023666,0.0003851554,0.000015096011,0.0018867225,0.010781943,0.00012296454,0.00088524976,0.04024207,0.9395869,0.000037627884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016217168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021137202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016217168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005025268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009705071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036461055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123808924","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5007","title":"DESIGNING ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Administration of justice; Administrative law; Adaptation (eye); Sociology; Law; Geography; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.24663566810625512,"score_gpt":0.5011033493798046,"score_spread":0.25446768127354946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123808924","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020906145,0.0018606306,0.74636334,0.017289354,0.00093687535,0.0016832561,0.00016839856,0.0012317324,0.20956029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35773814,0.0020150517,0.5957974,0.0028321673,0.00016317991,0.002093914,0.00037817963,0.00069936854,0.03828258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93422395,0.052100956,0.0020654176,0.0031831474,0.005643547,0.002782962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96232086,0.022107735,0.0017919026,0.0072723506,0.0043548616,0.00215222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03796011,0.0011634274,0.0007861021,0.0029649916,0.0111368485,0.015528647,0.0042739674,0.0036149896,0.012901099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050450437,0.0010208095,0.0013927096,0.0020019743,0.020825775,0.011519393,0.010725712,0.003668929,0.0026223985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045184122,0.00018517557,0.0026651644,0.0008730336,0.000047296275,0.00035293517,0.07351743,0.004704438,0.0010839748,0.79369396,0.014647834,0.10818367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043589025,0.00016252598,0.00072882033,0.0010129734,0.00004187289,0.00041059355,0.042233396,0.0032843864,0.0014904818,0.23989692,0.7106265,0.000068046254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066419123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123709375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03796011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011624948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022083994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20075464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124481640","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4365","title":"AGGRESSION AS “ORGANIZED HYPOCRISY?” – HOW THE WAR ON TERRORISM AND HYBRID THREATS CHALLENGE THE NUREMBERG LEGACY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Charter; Humanities; Politics; Aggression; Hypocrisy; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0588312614752559,"score_gpt":0.34743082241199924,"score_spread":0.2885995609367433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124481640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07493215,0.08425021,0.010176522,0.2468432,0.0035412922,0.00009007875,0.000078972305,0.00007169045,0.58001584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90781057,0.032018658,0.002441829,0.028898325,0.0013826042,0.00013632384,0.000041805037,0.00012543194,0.02714451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99137855,0.006350203,0.00019979809,0.0006640064,0.0007336102,0.0006738085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941854,0.00386198,0.00059803366,0.0005531931,0.00051507057,0.00028639837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060738767,0.00062640785,0.00069979887,0.0020696574,0.0057748696,0.015860263,0.0016052091,0.0059047537,0.004858125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009075491,0.00041833642,0.00049283373,0.0021780927,0.062420886,0.024843974,0.006933859,0.006669389,0.000755976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007779033,0.000009974208,0.0004156927,0.00011530326,0.000011332651,0.0001695891,0.03536971,0.00010216218,0.000035935805,0.9480357,0.0060419976,0.0096847145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109604825,0.000029055174,0.0022169107,0.0019637146,0.00002194273,0.00071324763,0.09165149,0.0002836965,0.00018471967,0.5111881,0.39168587,0.000050317158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014276792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01902562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015860263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070905513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006116952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051445782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124638337","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4367","title":"TURNING THE SPOTLIGHT ON CLASS REPRESENTATIVES -EMPIRICAL INSIGHTS FROM DOWN UNDER","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Accounting Education and Careers","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Monash University; Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Genealogy; Data science; Political science; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05512572733748845,"score_gpt":0.3292749757039268,"score_spread":0.27414924836643834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124638337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8240543,0.0040226225,0.0005697443,0.01695539,0.00011991198,0.00009059773,0.0002860028,0.000007789018,0.15389366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98627114,0.0013365024,0.000067467,0.001310544,0.000051779138,0.00002165616,0.000098129094,0.000011183307,0.010831773],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923201,0.0022339085,0.00020699008,0.0007448996,0.0017855449,0.0027085734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97104275,0.014263238,0.0057766577,0.0010967368,0.0043360153,0.0034845995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065040966,0.0002360055,0.00056416605,0.0031854138,0.013477896,0.008416531,0.0013304662,0.0017016612,0.017437844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032638337,0.00034770824,0.00022480785,0.0037570503,0.010006194,0.006726168,0.0037535608,0.0037515874,0.0011011878],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014708647,0.0003517956,0.20672718,0.00018989283,0.000028142602,0.0009195079,0.55779094,0.00010638891,0.00023459774,0.16110253,0.022617046,0.049784936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015811642,0.00006126719,0.2590931,0.00077902636,0.000034952096,0.00014543277,0.6236213,0.00013710883,0.00026160278,0.005473772,0.11034475,0.00003191345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4687882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58239496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4687882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014625328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009940994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93211913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125584685","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4544","title":"On There Being Wide Reflective Equilibria: Why it is Important to Put it in the Plural","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Coherentism; Normative; Generality; Epistemology; Morality; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Liberalism; Reflective equilibrium; Philosophy; Law; Foundationalism; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.11873980687484718,"score_gpt":0.3390400621543505,"score_spread":0.2203002552795033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125584685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016500654,0.018400272,0.17512922,0.49129117,0.0035780862,0.000108628155,0.00019971794,0.00036129702,0.29443094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8152739,0.007919581,0.06040463,0.059945792,0.004112056,0.0003809644,0.00016289194,0.00096696103,0.050833285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810177,0.01068527,0.0006987663,0.0030315071,0.0030059342,0.0015607718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97291857,0.01525126,0.0014294449,0.004387571,0.0046747294,0.0013383728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02170913,0.00089572964,0.0015290049,0.002156729,0.010433195,0.017104138,0.0031083713,0.0118492395,0.012898149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048641752,0.00067993975,0.0011850095,0.0023957198,0.057223294,0.049970545,0.010539757,0.012863323,0.0036808879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057824996,0.0000039107176,0.00008080403,0.000024209601,0.0000036634299,0.000022635277,0.0016457954,0.00006101322,0.00002090903,0.9908791,0.0037447198,0.0035074388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005396821,0.000003353277,0.000047243368,0.000057173314,0.0000021370352,0.00003350542,0.0010091319,0.00014050484,0.00004113145,0.9772499,0.021401068,0.000009361233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004235065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048618265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02170913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00511636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004340438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11481023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125781662","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4564","title":"Learning to Act Like a Lawyer: A Model Code of Professional Responsibility for Law Students","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Ethical code; Practice of law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09656630499813047,"score_gpt":0.4906529854882204,"score_spread":0.39408668049008994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125781662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35868776,0.00063651975,0.032644402,0.138983,0.0006303574,0.0004943261,0.000063419626,0.00019065058,0.46766952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95075744,0.00040735852,0.013728756,0.0047810636,0.00010187508,0.0002495203,0.000025878431,0.000055864,0.029892255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924901,0.004300161,0.00013556314,0.00049181626,0.0013090633,0.0012732737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923734,0.0018244792,0.00057974586,0.00044320282,0.0010401965,0.0037389267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005229117,0.00040221118,0.0002803061,0.0011946436,0.012481727,0.0143004935,0.0026457063,0.0061125956,0.0059834626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077713393,0.00038820133,0.00068699947,0.0008114502,0.022300104,0.0073854523,0.00880931,0.0065705646,0.0011272723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057013745,0.0010436482,0.008806086,0.00006830853,0.000005377428,0.0005107392,0.09989601,0.001672731,0.00046417554,0.8470868,0.015250127,0.025138952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026145036,0.000922972,0.010424964,0.00052537373,0.000045046258,0.0011414624,0.20063673,0.029315805,0.0010623363,0.4758306,0.2796022,0.00023111166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055889364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077878825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055889364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018125383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031361796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13150948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175488539","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7192","title":"Civil Revolution: User Experiences with British Columbia’s Online Court","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Online dispute resolution; Exploratory research; Dispute resolution; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Law; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.023583093107586682,"score_gpt":0.25257431049699947,"score_spread":0.22899121738941278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175488539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733102,0.00026598907,0.0002748421,0.0018538525,0.000030373847,0.00004782252,0.00016809559,0.000061010152,0.023987751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802592,0.00030682576,0.00035401032,0.0010333043,0.000011023381,0.000046866862,0.00018587647,0.00005823338,0.017744673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722594,0.0012073552,0.000094738694,0.00021534305,0.0006892091,0.00056735525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991087,0.004558971,0.00043873247,0.00049403816,0.0015482042,0.0018731449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030178935,0.00029055064,0.0004558679,0.0012052079,0.014145941,0.0064889058,0.0011038786,0.0016720855,0.009286113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010460129,0.00036371264,0.0001843367,0.0024712568,0.0036108561,0.0028940854,0.003511625,0.0019384678,0.001357594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011865654,0.00026283285,0.018177385,0.00007316333,0.0000104559795,0.0016862347,0.93756366,0.000081503706,0.0012704477,0.0011493749,0.011817658,0.02778864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016090988,0.00010669063,0.0373338,0.0001164875,0.0000139078975,0.00041252782,0.87920845,0.0005209959,0.00042538872,0.00023586843,0.08152872,0.00008103247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6771199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82880473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3228801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01045624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064671463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6495632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W318490112","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4501","title":"Agency Design in the European Union","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); European union; Accountability; Position (finance); Political science; Through-the-lens metering; State (computer science); Law and economics; Public administration; Member state; Member states; Law; Business; Lens (geology); Economics; Sociology; Engineering; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.07207854166794878,"score_gpt":0.348185847833609,"score_spread":0.27610730616566026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W318490112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022277176,0.020840231,0.06709076,0.013484488,0.0005941787,0.00010070234,0.000063652726,0.000117298674,0.8754314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9104762,0.008629476,0.024477666,0.0026743936,0.0003193191,0.0003705562,0.00007837813,0.00008348769,0.05289054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96165687,0.028084852,0.0017823324,0.0030363589,0.0032847205,0.0021548881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940094,0.0033953364,0.00055240927,0.00090089935,0.000779366,0.0003626484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017248258,0.0005500729,0.0007835261,0.00287333,0.0067910636,0.020696204,0.0012577262,0.005777293,0.0072660106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012146454,0.0005370511,0.0008907104,0.00407626,0.027804205,0.010561221,0.007438107,0.0028717949,0.0010076266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027553156,0.0000027373483,0.00006522715,0.000013352004,0.0000022950628,0.000016171432,0.00081495155,0.00019578756,0.000007099688,0.9949019,0.0005861283,0.003391636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015834501,0.00003191655,0.00043072982,0.000249844,0.000011926547,0.0001537942,0.0025937534,0.0006861681,0.000105507344,0.73410285,0.2615977,0.000020043084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006773077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028335035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020696204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013262294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067753447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09622514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196881958","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6425","title":"Where The Sidewalk Ends: The Governance Of Waterfront Toronto’s Sidewalk Labs Deal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Accountability; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Corporation; General partnership; Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Municipal corporation; Local government; Public relations; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.05027003628671882,"score_gpt":0.34152951858278197,"score_spread":0.29125948229606313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196881958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24825664,0.0052697374,0.012556891,0.18303071,0.0006274135,0.00045579148,0.0010087667,0.00038306013,0.548411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88479537,0.0011438864,0.0016579021,0.0059246165,0.0000622568,0.00009011361,0.00018047687,0.00012636825,0.106019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878399,0.0032602036,0.00023567429,0.0012656624,0.0034142279,0.0039843475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848787,0.003282066,0.0009549945,0.00094800285,0.003994059,0.0059421216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006670407,0.00029179314,0.0003297812,0.001061752,0.023333773,0.022094604,0.0020095245,0.0038243583,0.011299159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014259134,0.0008362987,0.00028110069,0.003670121,0.022006214,0.004597356,0.0057642814,0.003931848,0.00076484133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007041907,0.00004145938,0.017638583,0.00014077443,0.000041155618,0.0013944831,0.087645315,0.0018348842,0.001140752,0.7093654,0.15286176,0.027825125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031729825,0.000034604847,0.0210093,0.00022137251,0.000033271157,0.00012451147,0.094940715,0.0013720926,0.0007760845,0.026310557,0.8550102,0.000135485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9594943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98701096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8588844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1411156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18776873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233108988","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4886","title":"SPLITTING TWAIL?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Temporalities; Decolonization; Argument (complex analysis); International relations; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08521279986176315,"score_gpt":0.4090848203018213,"score_spread":0.32387202044005814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233108988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16669953,0.004018388,0.015168903,0.043131635,0.002128417,0.00015010964,0.00024568153,0.000304005,0.76815337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8019977,0.0014311387,0.004302772,0.010985535,0.0004225642,0.00014811508,0.00024829293,0.00039394415,0.18006986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777764,0.00079325243,0.00007471461,0.00041159402,0.00028997587,0.0006528198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773705,0.00056314614,0.00032787462,0.0005010514,0.0003490803,0.0005217512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030285805,0.0003330396,0.00028562112,0.0011016872,0.009261688,0.008482351,0.0009665646,0.0018774287,0.02776873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006851752,0.00024567285,0.00041106108,0.0014443857,0.011438752,0.015738912,0.008336405,0.0038117967,0.0045925663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075926306,0.00002832987,0.0027738095,0.00007115421,0.000007928848,0.0004280052,0.104368806,0.000057508358,0.0004194511,0.7861474,0.037657045,0.06796471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013320196,0.000038918057,0.002939173,0.00028196664,0.000009696685,0.00044582406,0.09519665,0.0002275173,0.0005372851,0.15966447,0.7406193,0.000025957546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006812653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012840952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02776873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004586946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031849078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09289569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238151543","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5013","title":"THE INTERNET AS A SITE OF LEGAL EDUCATION AND COLLABORATION ACROSS CONTINENTS AND TIME ZONES: USING ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AS A TOOL FOR STUDENT LEARNING","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Mainstream; Dispute resolution; Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Aside; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public relations; The Internet; Legal education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02961345049684483,"score_gpt":0.3604436869340267,"score_spread":0.33083023643718185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238151543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79002726,0.00062097196,0.02637166,0.008708297,0.00013699403,0.00028285984,0.00007568191,0.00027648453,0.17349973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95645535,0.0009942909,0.026281659,0.0007934417,0.000038008424,0.0003053985,0.00008241747,0.000055749588,0.014993679],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968176,0.002363899,0.00006567558,0.00015919711,0.0003014943,0.00029208374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817574,0.0008181035,0.0001048253,0.00025588577,0.00006916072,0.000576305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025138503,0.0003147631,0.00022831722,0.00063382456,0.00522513,0.0072242264,0.0015102185,0.0016797723,0.009298668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003599122,0.00026724243,0.00038171269,0.0007006824,0.0042126626,0.0070890537,0.008838837,0.0017359053,0.0017164986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022406464,0.006490058,0.03611357,0.00039993544,0.00003943993,0.0024719439,0.24864925,0.005386611,0.0048194523,0.098430276,0.03137528,0.56560004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021848595,0.003125448,0.017112013,0.0006974462,0.00005215932,0.0027438393,0.32532457,0.010060443,0.006018354,0.05272715,0.5817945,0.00012561787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017289494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044786287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009298668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012580035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002533131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031107187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239905040","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4415","title":"LOST AND FOUND","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Art, Technology, and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Humanities; Art; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.038731503783211836,"score_gpt":0.2651119802642709,"score_spread":0.22638047648105908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239905040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025156755,0.009404791,0.0020958993,0.14547296,0.07836521,0.00012412359,0.0008699075,0.0005530634,0.76059836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047484837,0.0012045086,0.00029746894,0.009028829,0.0019595139,0.000027046022,0.00010771289,0.0002491103,0.9823773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998178,0.00038958408,0.00006340267,0.0002936831,0.000729362,0.000345844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976561,0.0003325872,0.00008984663,0.0003419304,0.0011130654,0.0004664862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017337888,0.0010332587,0.00064034964,0.0013407794,0.010456709,0.01019039,0.0012335065,0.003583119,0.19284533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009241011,0.00058248127,0.00067203573,0.0010382032,0.0050602,0.0084774,0.00736911,0.010686098,0.10496936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023622097,0.000012417547,0.00006474039,0.000033594173,0.000002231013,0.00010547227,0.002243835,0.000012753999,0.00012775931,0.015563119,0.9566733,0.025137095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012532904,0.000003276072,0.00005551518,0.00005241895,9.376012e-7,0.000049005524,0.0015336092,0.000003549021,0.000042183485,0.0008354235,0.9974197,0.0000031964576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017213503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041441433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19284533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003877573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049977084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6451319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243187339","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4547","title":"Intelligent Governmentality","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Humanities; Political science; Normalization (sociology); Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.08876660572242885,"score_gpt":0.37786608833157453,"score_spread":0.2890994826091457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243187339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022271933,0.0024846895,0.040823955,0.022696787,0.00038563143,0.00006475401,0.000093042,0.00022864755,0.9109505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9113953,0.0016226107,0.008756372,0.003158193,0.00041747108,0.00013062207,0.00013210584,0.00012056857,0.07426682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624217,0.0014852863,0.00015761056,0.0009298668,0.0006607476,0.00052434846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701774,0.00095888507,0.00027574148,0.0011550466,0.00037641654,0.00021619434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004247236,0.00037960344,0.00038611586,0.0011644003,0.0037394431,0.007582051,0.00079019606,0.0028464173,0.0071194735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00590927,0.00023600618,0.00050335744,0.0008674986,0.025043083,0.00751991,0.004433521,0.0024408288,0.0016540012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010004626,0.0000013860221,0.000047756235,0.0000043709288,7.548395e-7,0.000009144213,0.00056028966,0.000045129575,0.00002107696,0.99740666,0.00068319606,0.0012191662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047850385,0.0000063793673,0.00013660661,0.00004067764,0.0000035713413,0.000046512596,0.0005868072,0.00025701142,0.00014261523,0.8711696,0.12759984,0.0000056449167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020813786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017509442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007582051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041048736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003321536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02978301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249062820","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4613","title":"Economic Incarceration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misdemeanor; Minor (academic); Sanctions; Population; Adjudication; Revenue; Business; Law; Political science; Finance; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.041893194412490085,"score_gpt":0.2691188120501002,"score_spread":0.2272256176376101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249062820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007887472,0.0024886676,0.003965177,0.0049972404,0.0010459106,0.00015373372,0.00071186014,0.00033816497,0.9784118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08973174,0.0040646465,0.002599996,0.0036602234,0.00030192971,0.00021355075,0.0013393682,0.00017444023,0.8979141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984086,0.00019022521,0.000060866638,0.00019263444,0.00065166457,0.000496106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986761,0.00014715525,0.000108580614,0.00025615134,0.00059818354,0.00021373728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218806,0.0006567148,0.0003413437,0.0020759078,0.0032585182,0.0030250566,0.001611358,0.001404068,0.13240655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042877034,0.00024407894,0.00059428986,0.0016493975,0.0009774547,0.0018031906,0.0035834117,0.0025258583,0.03172772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010785549,0.00018184558,0.0030654604,0.00024409688,0.000023409197,0.0006037531,0.0006260777,0.00065986754,0.00048427127,0.40610546,0.33025733,0.2576405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008831627,0.000033793185,0.0027911481,0.00011748638,0.0000073576966,0.00025941624,0.0002834511,0.00036246033,0.0003489582,0.009459204,0.9863164,0.00001140625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012477431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01788739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13240655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002851768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045103515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44294405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255957776","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4506","title":"Consultation During Rule-Making: A Case Study of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Obligation; Humanities; Refugee; Public administration; Cabinet (room); Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.10714368950179845,"score_gpt":0.4665029569270166,"score_spread":0.3593592674252182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255957776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408609,0.0011787636,0.0037868281,0.013657769,0.00017435414,0.00042707787,0.00007612248,0.00003568677,0.03980236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802131,0.0014411309,0.004144202,0.0032656041,0.00008281399,0.0002577075,0.000048737114,0.000053275566,0.010493463],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96316206,0.027828742,0.0006917321,0.0013238216,0.0025078072,0.0044857725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595419,0.029741453,0.0023889826,0.0011597846,0.0020943992,0.0050734947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017160118,0.00089384196,0.0008927789,0.0023713615,0.057894893,0.009630736,0.004416361,0.012981221,0.0049407743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03578957,0.0010886991,0.0011096251,0.0033307548,0.018165464,0.004952594,0.008918159,0.011914527,0.00071165984],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000631871,0.0006505081,0.005095752,0.00016036246,0.000014661663,0.037125353,0.92945856,0.000343383,0.00049002777,0.014004774,0.0034292596,0.009164288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019809957,0.000113168586,0.0024153537,0.00022484614,0.000011999292,0.004382473,0.9631508,0.00049977074,0.00040178726,0.0013114841,0.02742651,0.000042036707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110182256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26552364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01947521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020584865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21908182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281617713","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7285","title":"The Legal Regulation of Sadomasochism and the So-Called “Rough Sex Defence”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Sadomasochism; Context (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Same sex; Narrative; Criminology; Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; Sociology; Gender studies; Human sexuality; History; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Art; Medicine; Literature","score_opus":0.034536178810233735,"score_gpt":0.3355211914703289,"score_spread":0.30098501266009514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281617713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20143446,0.006029117,0.007354384,0.034049653,0.00038567896,0.00008476735,0.000060748906,0.00004058379,0.7505605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829586,0.00074817304,0.0006186699,0.0020715673,0.00005314114,0.000018290784,0.000009697252,0.000009029183,0.01351267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968646,0.0007466785,0.000083030696,0.00027011972,0.0010370337,0.0009984595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984962,0.0005955379,0.00025561763,0.00015006593,0.00031725268,0.00018527753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024122691,0.00021044216,0.0002538585,0.0008476191,0.0093454,0.0051751,0.001154136,0.002368722,0.0022815373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036839861,0.00023387256,0.00023350626,0.00065060845,0.04981866,0.0015987037,0.004763993,0.0034148681,0.000154518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060312464,0.0000051299508,0.0008754393,0.000026110143,0.0000021763628,0.00016988696,0.022517744,0.000045498655,0.00049612694,0.9699857,0.0014775358,0.004392697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032530756,0.00006875841,0.027639726,0.00060950225,0.000046863675,0.0012531896,0.09922548,0.00065496046,0.0034181648,0.33546126,0.531478,0.00011163572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49313807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.637996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49313807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013297116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029122047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281682254","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7284","title":"Practising an Anti-Colonial Citizenship Education Through a Blended Learning Course on Aboriginal Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Citizenship; Colonialism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.06902634390145324,"score_gpt":0.45732634177729153,"score_spread":0.3882999978758383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281682254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9119413,0.00027477532,0.010494046,0.0030919716,0.0002640284,0.001208748,0.000065333305,0.0002745414,0.0723852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8939749,0.0009825956,0.03898749,0.0015103451,0.00010637038,0.00066599395,0.00013889397,0.0000535814,0.06357981],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990017,0.00027834778,0.00003725378,0.00013521775,0.000236651,0.00031083284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798334,0.000443444,0.00010449322,0.00014046305,0.00021275775,0.0011155792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024553323,0.0006031116,0.00039193415,0.00067468255,0.003805033,0.0037603106,0.0017945219,0.0014764245,0.007832761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023280669,0.00025401128,0.00043364844,0.00043663313,0.0018814416,0.0017645076,0.004936734,0.002109442,0.0020556776],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004165266,0.0510807,0.01808933,0.000899531,0.000034803175,0.005740721,0.24655364,0.0026812172,0.03360591,0.020750053,0.024104893,0.59604263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042944684,0.018754937,0.073103786,0.001714151,0.00010870186,0.0047129537,0.34349373,0.012892568,0.045219768,0.021132542,0.4781499,0.00028757774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032420442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009779987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007832761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019165357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005352628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026203215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281718201","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7196","title":"L’accès à l’accompagnement et à la représentation par les personnes accidentées ou malades du travail : une analyse sous le prisme des coûts de la justice","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09344380584774481,"score_gpt":0.45641706058705894,"score_spread":0.36297325473931413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281718201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95835555,0.001331435,0.00075141614,0.004006729,0.000049792226,0.00006790664,0.000962264,0.000015043687,0.03445984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840889,0.00080978853,0.0002840132,0.0002446307,0.000010901676,0.000035126865,0.00027184185,0.0000096421145,0.014245124],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752456,0.00047678128,0.00008838183,0.00022153872,0.0009239782,0.0007648566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995523,0.0005062185,0.0006055835,0.00011768378,0.002434568,0.0008129813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013755058,0.0003458849,0.00039911055,0.001926986,0.007965909,0.0046962854,0.0011639666,0.0007999464,0.01068129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055140443,0.00022075091,0.00033529225,0.0039314316,0.0036885852,0.0015608937,0.0030348918,0.0012871602,0.00068821013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016164657,0.00009221902,0.4404103,0.00034164463,0.00008951797,0.0008981235,0.4630118,0.00079577294,0.0007406739,0.020919649,0.009535237,0.063003354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039564825,0.00004151682,0.65831053,0.0003414175,0.000031647043,0.00012123502,0.3073699,0.00039500243,0.00013520374,0.0005729411,0.032632627,0.000043955763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040049065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040049065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05006219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29057765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281719511","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7283","title":"Access to Justice as a Social Determinant of Health: The Basis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Framing (construction); Political science; Realm; Health equity; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Health care; Geography","score_opus":0.18410616623551274,"score_gpt":0.5251866666900734,"score_spread":0.3410805004545607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281719511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13796492,0.074098475,0.0041577397,0.4722905,0.00093918014,0.00010766819,0.0008743079,0.00007002989,0.3094971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541286,0.025059907,0.0015224742,0.008400829,0.00051966094,0.000036792364,0.00013233554,0.000017042488,0.010182277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958539,0.0006126714,0.000106482265,0.00026732162,0.0014371105,0.0017224632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948854,0.0013727719,0.0005164042,0.00020470351,0.001348924,0.0016717957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023865553,0.00033920072,0.0005840192,0.0032880392,0.009267541,0.010366527,0.0017607664,0.0018559519,0.004261894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061162035,0.00022347283,0.0004248927,0.0032777821,0.029503271,0.002696929,0.006460135,0.0036861117,0.00016857429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021126812,0.00007640225,0.048862405,0.0004065139,0.000053198775,0.0005180944,0.01678991,0.00084614987,0.00027101932,0.80589503,0.021436967,0.10482325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016009517,0.00007978898,0.25792846,0.003844496,0.00013783539,0.0004936875,0.05376991,0.002154844,0.0005309942,0.36090776,0.3199626,0.0001735833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94242203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98018634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94242203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057960108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13547005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.420532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281733716","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7280","title":"Sex Workers and the Best Interests of their Children: Issues Faced by Sex Workers Involved in Custody and Access Legal Proceedings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Child custody; Sex work; Best interests; Female sex; Stigma (botany); Judicial opinion; Family law; Same sex; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Family medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.0227481550487409,"score_gpt":0.31702754742897266,"score_spread":0.29427939238023176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281733716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92871344,0.009362535,0.00026382226,0.020916237,0.00007725708,0.00004029515,0.00005845034,0.0000028511736,0.040565033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99118865,0.0040525445,0.00020010989,0.0011226427,0.000023854767,0.000018139168,0.000013600984,0.0000032669393,0.0033770446],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959203,0.001785337,0.00015788469,0.00020667259,0.0010801402,0.0008496549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937709,0.0034990122,0.0015262986,0.00017687515,0.00048202145,0.00054483255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004872152,0.0001333437,0.00028336662,0.00085369946,0.010053507,0.0051999814,0.00086229347,0.0015726014,0.002877571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123383785,0.0002668122,0.0001496719,0.0012282097,0.012553825,0.0029848276,0.00325185,0.0027831553,0.0001527727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027554308,0.00003134252,0.06958628,0.00013240027,0.00000948217,0.0037184877,0.8759817,0.00004149921,0.00050152856,0.022848131,0.0030196644,0.024101984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060197826,0.0000406095,0.07351937,0.00049676077,0.000011323286,0.0014928405,0.87205815,0.000037667553,0.00025177153,0.0024624942,0.049603928,0.000018992094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30910718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6267914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30910718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013780932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017617226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6146159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281789958","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7281","title":"Measuring Improvements in Access to Justice: Utilizing an A2J Measurement Framework for Comparative Justice Data Collection and Program Evaluation Across Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Data collection; Population; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Business; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.7083547047958997,"score_gpt":0.5923293814452161,"score_spread":0.1160253233506836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281789958","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26334918,0.01865458,0.3143885,0.07275997,0.0008916095,0.017629987,0.011764825,0.0009249247,0.29963642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74067247,0.0044831135,0.23819108,0.002834,0.000093011055,0.0072939033,0.0019159662,0.00018018372,0.004336367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7460214,0.16829829,0.01541625,0.0075898124,0.053129032,0.009545248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68916,0.15754199,0.01049699,0.015316501,0.11884077,0.008643713],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1989412,0.0009543302,0.0023753457,0.026179714,0.022922114,0.023743311,0.0047915983,0.0020213884,0.0019389032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24973334,0.0010835712,0.0015163912,0.044759,0.015202013,0.0069809337,0.015068205,0.005042157,0.0002140283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002577995,0.0004882005,0.10647863,0.0032182555,0.0011316009,0.0006263171,0.09151389,0.012060745,0.0012567558,0.4354192,0.018761842,0.32878676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022775317,0.00070689514,0.43774304,0.012673162,0.0010756282,0.00028449064,0.13384676,0.041853394,0.003697585,0.18636234,0.1805659,0.000963154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98811483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25571454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25571454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44786495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281885721","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7193","title":"Judicializing Foreign Affairs: The Canada-Saudi Arms Deal and the Implications of Transnational Tort Litigation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Multinational corporation; Political science; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Tort reform; Liability","score_opus":0.030402332600442263,"score_gpt":0.30286835348248914,"score_spread":0.27246602088204686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281885721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17153387,0.02644466,0.0015387269,0.17089726,0.0007625917,0.0000705886,0.0002800039,0.000048713588,0.6284236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943227,0.010438294,0.0004931613,0.01943724,0.00023204538,0.000021657585,0.000070393304,0.000019432424,0.026060795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944141,0.0007799173,0.00010694653,0.0004434582,0.0016147789,0.0026407924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551517,0.0017574196,0.00030649107,0.00016325127,0.0015429994,0.000714631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033839906,0.00030339716,0.00032429452,0.0018399847,0.027551336,0.016447837,0.001823348,0.007936245,0.005027548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009279462,0.0002993371,0.0005344832,0.002475683,0.017572379,0.0037066964,0.003944084,0.007197494,0.00036574024],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027816362,0.000028328333,0.004231413,0.00008801746,0.000019830417,0.001794921,0.011987791,0.00088428636,0.00026799418,0.9284697,0.033541672,0.018658195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007951076,0.000062572544,0.03773539,0.0015295007,0.00019128488,0.0015607685,0.0941076,0.0043240446,0.0014193974,0.20280012,0.65591985,0.00026998992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9714206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98372746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10669986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10669986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14240564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7741653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281896359","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7195","title":"As the Water Grinds the Stone: Comparison of Represented and Self-represented Appellant Populations in the Federal Court of Appeal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Population; Political science; Federal court; Psychology; Supreme court; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.0705370376734049,"score_gpt":0.3057938912696534,"score_spread":0.23525685359624848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281896359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99850035,0.00007732459,0.00011038347,0.00009500426,0.0000031678023,0.000020751046,0.000083802755,0.00000218973,0.0011069679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993781,0.000042320924,0.00005513008,0.00006637836,0.000005399639,0.000011140612,0.00009949673,0.0000016076351,0.00034044997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946904,0.001005001,0.00032237617,0.0007839357,0.0022022766,0.0009959185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937091,0.0010813881,0.0025456604,0.0003774837,0.0013818338,0.0009044704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030336282,0.00010767579,0.00030184005,0.0030131813,0.0026919867,0.0019917104,0.0010211193,0.00064493803,0.0014802796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009961697,0.00018931497,0.00019316896,0.0017503109,0.0015491083,0.0011323305,0.00195846,0.00050750474,0.00020164011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006867119,0.00008849256,0.9631701,0.000019091336,0.00004115694,0.00029911703,0.02314022,0.000037211674,0.00063050224,0.00069904537,0.000754021,0.011052343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016348122,0.00005128852,0.9812997,0.000010303038,0.000009294332,0.0002197884,0.01695734,0.000161198,0.0001510948,0.00008592734,0.0010429147,0.000009624107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19643725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36645755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80356276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002661838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024591403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3905877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282014895","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7198","title":"Getting to Proportionality: The Trouble with Sentencing for Possession of Child Pornography in Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Seriousness; Proportionality (law); Possession (linguistics); Harm; Punitive damages; Criminology; Psychology; Reasonable suspicion; Child pornography; Pornography; Political science; Legislation; Law; Social psychology; Computer science; The Internet","score_opus":0.040986544675246636,"score_gpt":0.32815430170845156,"score_spread":0.2871677570332049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282014895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641706,0.0004596388,0.0007161031,0.0068701007,0.000050998697,0.00016962369,0.00013292702,0.000020397621,0.027409578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99193007,0.0004479012,0.0006573257,0.0005647019,0.000017243468,0.000044316264,0.00006367074,0.000014950172,0.006259825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98656195,0.0016883741,0.00061291433,0.00081947574,0.0064481352,0.0038690323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809332,0.0056338087,0.004440732,0.0011002008,0.006161002,0.0017310402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047674533,0.00026180738,0.00041747236,0.001687701,0.026691625,0.0039930046,0.002588393,0.0018677623,0.002411651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041975677,0.0008817204,0.00048254378,0.0025984836,0.0082484735,0.0016520575,0.00516664,0.0031277938,0.00021890686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033380048,0.00013659896,0.31877932,0.00035147808,0.0001160371,0.012432065,0.52234143,0.002802023,0.004017987,0.03871567,0.016278889,0.08369473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039171042,0.000115125265,0.5737518,0.00034014758,0.000107527165,0.0019700665,0.34361508,0.0024641315,0.00186969,0.0039969804,0.07153716,0.00019308273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14545254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14545254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14547166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284878679","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7391","title":"Incomplete Justice: The Costs of Partial Indemnity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Mistake; Misconduct; Economic Justice; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07634989612343603,"score_gpt":0.3785023178552912,"score_spread":0.3021524217318552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284878679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0971954,0.0038250154,0.027895791,0.053991728,0.0003949019,0.00010618437,0.00017998966,0.00010871326,0.8163023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95702004,0.0013196229,0.0028614856,0.0050285747,0.00027164648,0.00007741185,0.000046310328,0.00006835861,0.033306498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864313,0.0032361648,0.00051318033,0.0012175083,0.006397532,0.002204293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854563,0.0062572677,0.0012940438,0.002695439,0.0031019698,0.0011950072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006583136,0.00033362655,0.00064546836,0.0012887685,0.0056864303,0.010905959,0.002039967,0.0035233833,0.008164933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025349388,0.00053024257,0.0005007431,0.00091216,0.022748102,0.009927716,0.0068284906,0.006022805,0.0006290624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015888023,0.000012458981,0.0012688226,0.000029600023,0.000011028416,0.000100480545,0.0008587155,0.0004891999,0.00011233418,0.9785348,0.0038455895,0.014721057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024016208,0.000057779493,0.00567908,0.00035455378,0.000042770058,0.00036350146,0.001542951,0.0016607279,0.00048104572,0.8653422,0.12439993,0.000051427403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061396826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09771942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061396826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014949536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014877676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122078955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284885721","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7390","title":"The Consequences of Unfreedom: Learning from Story Amidst a Global Climate Crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Narrative; Indigenous; Political science; Climate change; Democracy; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Politics; Ecology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03556608946062637,"score_gpt":0.3318075510633373,"score_spread":0.2962414616027109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284885721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6585089,0.0061805774,0.004229091,0.18900438,0.0018766219,0.00023224292,0.00074584666,0.00016471915,0.13905765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96205944,0.004374868,0.0011994421,0.012464954,0.000293881,0.00009677996,0.00025550945,0.00021096032,0.019044256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902563,0.0059067346,0.00012228066,0.00046100555,0.0013794121,0.0018742272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848808,0.008218266,0.00077757746,0.00050813454,0.0022430962,0.0033721677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068019466,0.0012003285,0.0010504343,0.001574616,0.04224895,0.018316146,0.004293244,0.007755922,0.004526281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020270292,0.0007006644,0.00053159683,0.002486137,0.04249176,0.015530447,0.011112849,0.016579192,0.00079641305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016727674,0.000020355823,0.00085944956,0.000033249795,0.0000037926004,0.0010727885,0.9777144,0.000060882634,0.00009308014,0.0066510276,0.011078383,0.002395889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028253091,0.000009276829,0.00035644384,0.00010927769,0.0000045697197,0.0002696369,0.94760394,0.00009268441,0.000110382396,0.0016942613,0.049727693,0.000019000357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39944044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63013494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39944044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03740747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023015333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7942309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284887130","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7388","title":"Mapping Racial Geographies of Violence on the Colonial Landscape","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Materiality (auditing); Colonialism; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Vulnerability (computing); Criminology; Environmental justice; Race (biology); Inequality; Geography; Gender studies; Ethnology; Political science; Ecology; Aesthetics; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.026231122946789705,"score_gpt":0.31476815121689994,"score_spread":0.28853702827011024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284887130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491578,0.0011841315,0.0010818162,0.00069166505,0.000030254354,0.000050853025,0.001446615,0.000027551394,0.046329398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467576,0.00073977956,0.001301199,0.00003964527,0.0000095874875,0.000027745597,0.0004734551,0.000021645727,0.0027111026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994468,0.00012374953,0.000015652427,0.00008107825,0.00015601111,0.00017681546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993161,0.00017519166,0.00016320082,0.00005894778,0.00018318967,0.00010337688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040195588,0.00014078802,0.00018653553,0.004554626,0.0037550891,0.0030155042,0.0004582913,0.0003077305,0.0036383453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026815517,0.00013468997,0.00017412959,0.0076559605,0.0022884947,0.0010521845,0.002982371,0.00047764598,0.00024406565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017610122,0.000050094786,0.415914,0.00056373945,0.00008010431,0.0018290993,0.34147486,0.0023109547,0.0042821444,0.036465116,0.011520054,0.18533376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003871956,0.000022008982,0.6275119,0.00038984133,0.000030015657,0.0003864836,0.30328262,0.0012806784,0.00042081624,0.0022740588,0.06436302,0.000034613207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76458734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89253366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23541266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054558814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058046207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47359806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284889561","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7389","title":"Integrating Social Work Within Legal Clinics: An Inter-Professional Perspective to Address Social-Legal Needs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Social work; Public relations; Legal profession; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08879246285694156,"score_gpt":0.45659572673884535,"score_spread":0.36780326388190376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284889561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2206953,0.012079862,0.015998147,0.448436,0.005720195,0.0005403666,0.000058914087,0.00028110523,0.29619008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069644,0.008740176,0.01603441,0.025278024,0.0015424017,0.0003488826,0.000041848645,0.00012687492,0.04092295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870366,0.008316973,0.00021462643,0.00051030423,0.0015460636,0.002375432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865355,0.002947387,0.0006059273,0.0004150301,0.0009358794,0.008560311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008689559,0.00038711468,0.0003629264,0.00183743,0.02050344,0.011826287,0.0028450533,0.004670116,0.01013329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006445415,0.0003451094,0.00041891247,0.0011255211,0.016541809,0.0066562705,0.018530063,0.008006144,0.0011441502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003065502,0.0015509326,0.0078088082,0.00067546935,0.000027586797,0.0031038125,0.5955278,0.00026284475,0.0010710062,0.10341243,0.062166996,0.22436157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031793476,0.00038907607,0.006690808,0.0010239044,0.000015095902,0.0019020906,0.62031186,0.00023153165,0.00023795608,0.03082486,0.33829182,0.000049225182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072640567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038978774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02050344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006912386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0378374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050153077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284892928","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7392","title":"“A So-Called Tenants’ Union”: Defining the Organizational Power of Tenants within and outside the Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renting; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Law; Bargaining power; Labour law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.025729808930672383,"score_gpt":0.30689567893397945,"score_spread":0.28116587000330706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284892928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41561463,0.0034820917,0.023408283,0.03461222,0.00024948228,0.00014219058,0.000098702694,0.000038752074,0.5223537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987884,0.0004089476,0.0013562201,0.00061375496,0.00001755922,0.000023384122,0.000017351671,0.000013522712,0.009665211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390537,0.002533569,0.00014720883,0.00054462726,0.0011096345,0.0017597425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966725,0.0010254284,0.00049095554,0.00033329194,0.0006515404,0.000826246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00507578,0.00021249778,0.00027940853,0.0016617427,0.017545884,0.011679544,0.0015837679,0.0023358425,0.0035113702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006439927,0.0002981264,0.0002884796,0.002147364,0.07285726,0.006605329,0.004700366,0.0021450857,0.00029793943],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018744706,0.0000103738685,0.005146059,0.000031557498,0.000002983318,0.00027776757,0.21434525,0.00018863971,0.0003923192,0.7661277,0.002748634,0.010710058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008965251,0.00004012517,0.024834508,0.0006119368,0.000015713136,0.00030574613,0.5440951,0.0011718681,0.000536107,0.14930147,0.27901822,0.00006018242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68084425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76277924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68084425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03804188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03616893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64207065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316881650","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7781","title":"The Influence of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence in the First Decade Since its Ratification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Ratification; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Treaty; Political science; Law; Convention; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Medicine; Psychiatry; Politics","score_opus":0.054730168962198074,"score_gpt":0.3368384121706654,"score_spread":0.28210824320846734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316881650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1414179,0.027837241,0.0034405882,0.17540619,0.0015818548,0.00012174027,0.0006159661,0.00006602505,0.6495125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93219185,0.011177486,0.0022885608,0.020171743,0.000285119,0.00003500369,0.00011578522,0.000054193068,0.03368025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97856176,0.0025525405,0.00036701572,0.0011867756,0.0119399065,0.005392079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797379,0.007436227,0.0008638066,0.0005478214,0.008710827,0.0027033952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010761867,0.00033499894,0.0005161719,0.003286941,0.027266996,0.01344436,0.0014664514,0.0035730407,0.0042663724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023458606,0.00035485983,0.00064083195,0.004303009,0.022884494,0.002652025,0.0048933704,0.006392487,0.00025005752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003854384,0.000026412188,0.0076598995,0.00018838453,0.000026306783,0.0004693284,0.029014604,0.00062619086,0.00070591236,0.8605123,0.040769786,0.05996237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034152876,0.00004807994,0.055852264,0.001312046,0.0000856923,0.00026233122,0.03359654,0.0011116435,0.0008229509,0.055267733,0.8513337,0.0002728081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99213916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99670583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1942446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1942446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30032927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9345621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317038158","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7779","title":"The Triumph of the “Therapeutic” in Quebec Courts: Mental Health, Behavioural Reform and the Decline of Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Public Health and Social Inequalities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Mental health; Economic Justice; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05808643350993687,"score_gpt":0.38053195781569554,"score_spread":0.3224455243057587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317038158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22575487,0.04034686,0.0016568111,0.49838886,0.0009742222,0.00008361977,0.00065330253,0.00006490891,0.23207656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93484104,0.006225747,0.0006858302,0.017342785,0.00019843916,0.00003718111,0.0001272537,0.000020981537,0.04052075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969766,0.00079746894,0.00005411335,0.00020735698,0.0007572747,0.0012071604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959627,0.00088084827,0.0003355885,0.00016055244,0.0011479456,0.00151237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025142555,0.00022261111,0.00032396667,0.0017080659,0.014257667,0.007328302,0.0018774441,0.0037456197,0.010781881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005675567,0.00021940417,0.00030366745,0.0023274855,0.01609419,0.0031940069,0.0027538447,0.0041736597,0.0003215058],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006684329,0.000101861864,0.017537331,0.0002089974,0.000030859443,0.000763693,0.03001579,0.000650862,0.0005688202,0.7824738,0.08661482,0.08096636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009962664,0.00009556389,0.19636345,0.001384069,0.00005889278,0.00045642623,0.043908067,0.0021541798,0.0006534818,0.07961259,0.675009,0.0002046053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1294864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1294864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09687422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93949395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317038159","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7780","title":"People With Disabilities Need Lawyers Too! A Ready-To-Use Plan for Law Schools to Educate Law Students to Effectively Serve the Legal Needs of Clients With Disabilities as Well as Clients Without Disabilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Legal education; Inclusion (mineral); Curriculum; Diversity (politics); Law; Legal profession; Action plan; Legal research; Plan (archaeology); Education Act; Political science; Special education; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.05319086489561085,"score_gpt":0.3855859909408429,"score_spread":0.332395126045232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317038159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040896535,0.010155348,0.0026598347,0.79092884,0.0063288026,0.00015850429,0.00019373975,0.00036268847,0.18512255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054152355,0.027051799,0.012593615,0.29535574,0.0024934546,0.00028644453,0.0004951555,0.0002500986,0.6073214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997889,0.00039980715,0.00006968553,0.00014577314,0.00077937834,0.00071636913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966905,0.00056055543,0.00018415804,0.00011899506,0.00058319326,0.0018626434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016113949,0.00048935355,0.000393188,0.000809157,0.008755654,0.006882389,0.00096932385,0.0076235333,0.049755186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004309107,0.0004732691,0.0004153734,0.0008304746,0.0055770073,0.013289823,0.008068832,0.009269533,0.013355858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006412735,0.00012374429,0.0010742076,0.00018457144,0.0000031036648,0.00021416605,0.004528779,0.00003518525,0.00029132608,0.056940738,0.8246506,0.11194724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069162024,0.000019212002,0.0011794509,0.0002358642,0.0000030001167,0.00019673916,0.0070561585,0.000014378562,0.00005794749,0.006586142,0.9846341,0.000010151569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07628963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24663733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07628963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053126966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027930833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1664477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317038211","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7778","title":"Students in Name Only: Improving the Working Conditions of Articled Students Via the Application of the BC Employment Standards Act","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Thompson Rivers University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Overtime; Statutory law; Status quo; Political science; Principal (computer security); Power (physics); Narrative; Rhetorical question; Public administration; Law; Labour economics; Sociology; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.02337011433174587,"score_gpt":0.36788481007450485,"score_spread":0.344514695742759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317038211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5871046,0.002092687,0.0013803288,0.08093378,0.0011598077,0.00018112776,0.00046903233,0.00015259559,0.3265261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7829749,0.0011213563,0.0011373485,0.01863069,0.000142474,0.00007047696,0.00025756157,0.000053957214,0.1956113],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997726,0.00030495925,0.00006359191,0.00012041713,0.0007961709,0.000988855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964982,0.0002367458,0.00020121252,0.00014244503,0.0012136775,0.001707667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015801416,0.00010018994,0.00018375024,0.00041595826,0.0082439305,0.0040265704,0.0010348093,0.0014341862,0.012104421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005971464,0.0001308943,0.00011118477,0.00065629935,0.0021253747,0.0010588836,0.0048088394,0.0020289228,0.002485008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018126771,0.000826018,0.12280452,0.0003042375,0.000019708546,0.000928942,0.05702999,0.00042246204,0.005718488,0.0673313,0.31169325,0.43273982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037376398,0.00024005232,0.1834234,0.00032147235,0.000022497503,0.00019705383,0.061293844,0.0002774228,0.0021838294,0.004069914,0.7478779,0.00005530125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49829933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8165393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49829933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009415808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03985982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914506","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8297","title":"Bargaining Sectoral Standards: Towards Canadian Fair Pay Agreement Legislation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Collective bargaining; Business; Agreement; Economics; Law and economics; Labour economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05271552033813775,"score_gpt":0.36072227387864436,"score_spread":0.3080067535405066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028191796,0.006188829,0.08539063,0.17156577,0.0035590704,0.0014359305,0.0015200065,0.0010335048,0.7011144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34360394,0.007049613,0.18158908,0.054352388,0.0007155403,0.0009973261,0.00173436,0.00043509534,0.40952265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96870136,0.0034179513,0.0009808007,0.0019627963,0.020742401,0.0041947025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783192,0.0027660625,0.00059589755,0.0013448168,0.014898562,0.0020753732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027017428,0.0006933034,0.0005188395,0.0051822094,0.013084946,0.012029936,0.006081856,0.0077573424,0.0078533655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028279625,0.001103959,0.0012962463,0.0045707435,0.00914287,0.0047421516,0.004841684,0.00864068,0.0012876231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013395238,0.000058205464,0.0008029854,0.00013389102,0.0000064755004,0.00010897613,0.003660796,0.0019062309,0.00068040524,0.8988171,0.056572884,0.03723875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035455632,0.000038841514,0.0045771315,0.00060407905,0.000018163342,0.00007463458,0.0029355374,0.0038188947,0.0007402528,0.07774446,0.90925586,0.00015666557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9785018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9785373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16510618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16510618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36518732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9683585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914512","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8299","title":"Bound by Blame: Sentencing, Colonialism, and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder; Criminology; Colonialism; Fetal alcohol; Psychology; Political science; Alcohol; Psychiatry; Pregnancy; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.020745536510607312,"score_gpt":0.3077435718410821,"score_spread":0.2869980353304748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93546516,0.0024779083,0.00033054815,0.03731249,0.00011533914,0.00002299234,0.0000130369035,0.000005929062,0.024256654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680966,0.00083141006,0.00014947822,0.0012282183,0.000029793466,0.0000066871867,0.0000042265706,0.0000029977623,0.000937527],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967602,0.001984489,0.00009870291,0.00011573673,0.00043204884,0.0006087943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395895,0.0034744702,0.0010554321,0.00013018303,0.00056231744,0.0008186947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039819903,0.00017109419,0.0002053575,0.0011166056,0.011437733,0.003571683,0.00091631594,0.0021319767,0.0017978752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018879373,0.00020303206,0.00017407748,0.0008577425,0.010210235,0.0024817323,0.0037269597,0.0039398866,0.00008430659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054181353,0.0002719383,0.08101658,0.00009792412,0.000023791978,0.003130773,0.8212826,0.00019182818,0.00038613277,0.056081243,0.0046070297,0.03285602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009667393,0.00006930293,0.10078336,0.00032344414,0.000038255308,0.001381548,0.8676271,0.00036244397,0.00022479903,0.013286996,0.01584183,0.00005124973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.367682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62331724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.367682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009534055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013676793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73108375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914589","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8579","title":"Swimming Up Niagara Falls! The Battle to Get Disability Rights Added to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Battle; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03491845498282878,"score_gpt":0.3268648556685373,"score_spread":0.29194640068570854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008800116,0.044223875,0.000754801,0.25541475,0.009634346,0.000052094227,0.00064097013,0.00014462562,0.6803343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08413278,0.029383216,0.001878662,0.03128138,0.0010812675,0.000045364955,0.00033588565,0.00020651116,0.8516549],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861777,0.00013607828,0.000017471972,0.000102492304,0.0006717243,0.00045440454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864906,0.00012752562,0.0000348503,0.000052518906,0.00070584455,0.00043021678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008679715,0.00044484914,0.00034495167,0.001291932,0.02188832,0.00682894,0.0008263301,0.0017522242,0.023174522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019833078,0.00026796345,0.00019223099,0.0020130964,0.006479101,0.0030614296,0.002382031,0.0037125682,0.0026908936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013328619,0.0000100492225,0.0006026234,0.00009551856,0.0000029587234,0.00013032141,0.012759083,0.000038377213,0.00018825043,0.077507555,0.8585059,0.05014602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011063903,0.0000018520567,0.00061207905,0.00007379286,0.0000013390554,0.000026373653,0.004715863,0.0000074051395,0.000036401645,0.0010030455,0.9935144,0.0000062214076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97392386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99391633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044289205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044289205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08147739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32134217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914607","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8298","title":"Planning Law and Accessibility: Third Party Permit Appeals by Persons with Disabilities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10866387942701011,"score_gpt":0.3989521232790768,"score_spread":0.2902882438520667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14040896,0.0032772296,0.005852365,0.10498352,0.0003689335,0.00011750287,0.0001579227,0.00007065994,0.7447629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94829893,0.0015728587,0.00071894785,0.013390194,0.00014353638,0.00009641026,0.000051767696,0.00002698798,0.035700288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915582,0.003173907,0.00027055375,0.000566485,0.0014237391,0.0030070876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888116,0.007084602,0.0009620165,0.00049979397,0.0012520584,0.0013899612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054061334,0.00023636084,0.00032311163,0.0014792088,0.013811034,0.0103768,0.0014506888,0.008569181,0.019905044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022341182,0.00032683127,0.0007104598,0.0018972786,0.02158778,0.008367573,0.008862924,0.005971453,0.000841788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004638567,0.00013435177,0.017838022,0.00008203146,0.00001906593,0.0023225297,0.06386759,0.00043258327,0.00014715815,0.8335492,0.04540447,0.036156695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084466614,0.000110487614,0.033968147,0.0012204616,0.00008600666,0.0029370796,0.19961746,0.0015781127,0.00050186575,0.28758782,0.4721324,0.000175624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47183505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45737535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47183505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02196575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020995356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93817735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914617","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.8294","title":"Safety in Numbers or Lost in the Crowd? Litigation of Mass Claims and Access to Justice in Ontario","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.11137195080881866,"score_gpt":0.3938040363502775,"score_spread":0.2824320855414588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28684708,0.015129811,0.0019346937,0.13334662,0.0006275905,0.00019877062,0.0005350101,0.000056527224,0.56132394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88066757,0.008969492,0.00097355986,0.007912522,0.00017212958,0.00006448258,0.00013614025,0.00003344856,0.10107062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948132,0.000514158,0.0002382739,0.0002438537,0.0027927614,0.001397735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921943,0.0034213725,0.00090341206,0.0002619301,0.0017175053,0.0015014833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032122992,0.0001995344,0.00034526605,0.0017063421,0.022087706,0.008081951,0.0018697813,0.0031589787,0.007999921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01178942,0.00037055966,0.00029689423,0.002779574,0.01147667,0.002903304,0.0043754326,0.0025024156,0.0004391569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008821703,0.000097396325,0.032033585,0.00058963295,0.000037982798,0.003938013,0.16022602,0.00078637403,0.0008754117,0.5231355,0.17127417,0.10691776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034900422,0.00007977884,0.08343024,0.0012848692,0.000072018796,0.00091802125,0.12133791,0.00095508323,0.0006755353,0.044515528,0.7465404,0.00015568869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9765513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99383247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111481816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111481816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13203229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80886096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914678","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8301","title":"The Nightingale Court Experiment: Lessons for Access to Justice in a Post-Pandemic World","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Pandemic; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.20728882075952218,"score_gpt":0.526498179586799,"score_spread":0.31920935882727686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20772845,0.017130962,0.003680198,0.31074882,0.0026337106,0.00018954118,0.00054048194,0.00009652281,0.45725134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8874947,0.00837642,0.0016719176,0.028983848,0.0007222291,0.00016457512,0.0001553329,0.000082744176,0.07234823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940519,0.0029588942,0.00016858506,0.0004947323,0.0008972449,0.0014285726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98373556,0.009780209,0.0006776468,0.0017368151,0.0010535029,0.0030163324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008742603,0.00018435743,0.000367954,0.0007970903,0.0076709758,0.012029041,0.0022115454,0.004977863,0.020670014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016768303,0.00026388714,0.00038920628,0.0008008258,0.020568853,0.01467074,0.00759071,0.006411924,0.0009958593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012352059,0.00017834405,0.0035494019,0.0001943196,0.00002150404,0.0010783381,0.020357763,0.0005138584,0.0003320405,0.88769054,0.04313692,0.04282348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008456826,0.0003465533,0.022253213,0.0010670361,0.000019225761,0.000693175,0.05146646,0.00072578475,0.00060560333,0.28863785,0.6339129,0.00018756867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057737865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10654219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009967455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012491269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11480355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914770","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8300","title":"Tracing Colonial Entrenchments in the Development of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Colonialism; Tracing; Geography; Political science; Business; History; Ancient history; Computer science; South asia; Archaeology; Operating system","score_opus":0.055417992306794575,"score_gpt":0.35121506955608783,"score_spread":0.29579707724929327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8672288,0.004954367,0.00028631472,0.0068196356,0.00008261906,0.000036958125,0.00009403485,0.000015215975,0.12048212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964128,0.0013249404,0.00014157637,0.00021866718,0.000011261858,0.000007245679,0.000016712052,0.000007820085,0.0018589856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998697,0.00046341444,0.00007546543,0.00013586433,0.0001599878,0.00046829387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979499,0.0006129418,0.0004534833,0.0001391788,0.0004748224,0.00036966705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017901157,0.00028721805,0.00020096124,0.0014371085,0.0053587523,0.007113338,0.0005815524,0.00071681384,0.0031910585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034749862,0.00056550687,0.00012319119,0.001927884,0.0096599655,0.0027235667,0.0038421114,0.0027871865,0.00030394754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016036029,0.00006274675,0.059206143,0.00045741032,0.00004642921,0.012555491,0.6197601,0.00052403955,0.0043841028,0.25947085,0.00737266,0.035999637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022768822,0.0001725596,0.20391119,0.0015541121,0.00007229805,0.0029638736,0.50517255,0.0006467342,0.0021155886,0.007713704,0.27548525,0.00016943352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116183825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22481434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116183825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013866407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008812729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23101509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406310846","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9063","title":"Vers un tournant participatif dans les recherches sur l’accès à la justice","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.49182711948429964,"score_gpt":0.5061050605662976,"score_spread":0.014277941081997925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406310846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024219679,0.103786424,0.011356042,0.41244206,0.03774287,0.0002215979,0.002280042,0.00023042514,0.40772092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19021572,0.06913813,0.01049917,0.03920249,0.011281601,0.00040395185,0.0013403234,0.0004893564,0.67742926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829677,0.008806656,0.00073656504,0.0015764405,0.004329083,0.0015835797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770811,0.014389786,0.00094735215,0.0011336099,0.004563286,0.0018848687],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014579228,0.000840585,0.0005955833,0.0034139808,0.009225451,0.016947065,0.0016693955,0.0068549295,0.032374375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027087217,0.0007328106,0.0006537221,0.005372856,0.0073792743,0.013544751,0.004296678,0.012200417,0.0036196744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116227675,0.000064951746,0.0017382784,0.0006103337,0.000021394782,0.00051946164,0.032148637,0.0002829946,0.0007101661,0.5350001,0.33292288,0.09586457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000489476,0.000015828124,0.0011119836,0.00060268823,0.0000035688602,0.00008970818,0.0059408215,0.00004400451,0.00023183762,0.006291425,0.98564273,0.000020576266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15801981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17673385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98542076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013037058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016295115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31420004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406310853","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9185","title":"No-Fault, Motor Vehicle Accidents, and The Civil Resolution Tribunal: Effective Justice or False Prophet?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Fault (geology); Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Humanities; Criminology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Seismology; Geology","score_opus":0.03893748772347299,"score_gpt":0.3611627251944742,"score_spread":0.3222252374710012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406310853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4242449,0.006345298,0.0057701943,0.27803633,0.0010118763,0.00004854926,0.000082777944,0.000033254546,0.2844268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847733,0.0006627545,0.00043547963,0.007917105,0.00013061447,0.000014182861,0.000013055502,0.00001734823,0.006036072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842569,0.0060405983,0.0003874518,0.000998444,0.004050057,0.004266533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98848397,0.005214973,0.0017981827,0.00095895166,0.0015826242,0.001961259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008135648,0.0002302787,0.00038248784,0.0016585902,0.022195956,0.020223051,0.0020979224,0.0043540024,0.0061083357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029817203,0.00029230354,0.00019687937,0.0021840886,0.055419385,0.015705308,0.009516726,0.0073123216,0.0004213951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030412055,0.000052377254,0.0068241074,0.00005941129,0.0000125566185,0.00038002583,0.105564065,0.00018131876,0.00011742219,0.8329071,0.016432285,0.037438974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010795725,0.00005291742,0.018488448,0.0005768088,0.000018651257,0.00033276918,0.5792051,0.000436513,0.00023190748,0.21695642,0.18360448,0.00008513372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1114881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19775625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98238635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01761362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018644253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22167832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406323765","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9017","title":"Introduction: Harnessing the Untapped Potential of the Canadian Charter/Réaliser le potentiel inexploité de la Charte canadienne","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Humanities; Art; Law","score_opus":0.026606116428856158,"score_gpt":0.2964037499439292,"score_spread":0.269797633515073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406323765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047833663,0.024214098,0.0029134636,0.2807006,0.012750025,0.00016991579,0.0045846975,0.00036931632,0.6695145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17030706,0.05433135,0.014120343,0.07638798,0.0060222624,0.000179755,0.003145156,0.0006424935,0.67486364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297225,0.00049644243,0.000097568205,0.00055053405,0.004603092,0.0012801045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925931,0.00098217,0.000184195,0.0003044744,0.0045533474,0.0013826448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004290291,0.00070597586,0.00035104263,0.0034039307,0.009912556,0.014574851,0.0018600632,0.0040546306,0.05830954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011391388,0.00035186068,0.00053385587,0.0046239514,0.007075544,0.0038770188,0.0033024303,0.0050551323,0.0050007943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013355332,0.0000097603715,0.00079297513,0.00021753258,0.0000055587943,0.00008511366,0.001836952,0.0002644428,0.00017895109,0.23707293,0.7116398,0.047882702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014674083,0.0000027177932,0.0012513802,0.00021891046,0.0000028706138,0.000019947056,0.00066908833,0.000059471964,0.00005188459,0.0035843363,0.99411964,0.000018403727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9781503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0760991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0760991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18699792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5521402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406324835","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9024","title":"Le droit constitutionnel aux communications et aux services publics fédéraux dans la langue officielle de son choix","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Politics and Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.04921862131085069,"score_gpt":0.3004025861817147,"score_spread":0.25118396487086403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406324835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07290161,0.007358429,0.0075682495,0.05908297,0.0008234902,0.00013281436,0.001078042,0.00018179229,0.8508726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7091013,0.0040618796,0.003141501,0.007879857,0.00047676568,0.00019353136,0.0004043918,0.00011701386,0.27462378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917887,0.0022067118,0.00029233075,0.0006745171,0.0023667056,0.002671032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931126,0.0026002827,0.0005971121,0.0004920318,0.0021068396,0.0010910374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00417978,0.00030238242,0.0003318878,0.0018401518,0.010135137,0.010040669,0.0007933964,0.0037537355,0.0139229335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011130465,0.0004091468,0.00033217014,0.0024507935,0.00956321,0.004166112,0.0029710196,0.004295954,0.0030941204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029902407,0.000019475967,0.0023445971,0.00006146263,0.000006297039,0.00020174685,0.011706535,0.00014652207,0.0003501778,0.94601786,0.021364536,0.017750813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018304308,0.00002882807,0.010462096,0.00034968002,0.000012722022,0.00021006908,0.007991125,0.00018857227,0.0004560711,0.03105597,0.9491811,0.00004548499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41333553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45922318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58666444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017893178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04670899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8218593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406324977","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9068","title":"Les modes de prévention et de règlement des différends [PRD] : une forme de participation citoyenne?","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.09692328417834967,"score_gpt":0.43294739397971066,"score_spread":0.336024109801361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406324977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17981413,0.005025269,0.07223768,0.07470183,0.0007522841,0.00044499786,0.00021511222,0.00021852122,0.66659015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94521314,0.0011290165,0.005739571,0.003197253,0.00011812931,0.00023965038,0.000064425476,0.000065005,0.044233803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98381054,0.0081067085,0.00041391727,0.001871844,0.0030836542,0.002713388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889552,0.003971873,0.0016555066,0.0014738879,0.0020572427,0.0018863588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011374148,0.0006238139,0.000544212,0.0021701015,0.0141480435,0.011937245,0.002949396,0.004553662,0.011797273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01713833,0.00045630918,0.0006581756,0.0016047851,0.045561366,0.009510386,0.013047941,0.006663835,0.0013410795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021590478,0.00004988297,0.005296299,0.00012591832,0.000012729336,0.00022293953,0.1265221,0.0001314695,0.0002829849,0.8321814,0.004049129,0.031103594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003934724,0.000120587894,0.016415687,0.0015091907,0.000047141275,0.0007522512,0.21667773,0.0010930836,0.0009379414,0.3274348,0.43482503,0.00014725364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07392315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09479934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07392315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013048561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024258742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14698571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325001","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9191","title":"Generative AI and Access to Justice in Canada: The Case of Self-Represented Litigants [SRLs]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07434151383586246,"score_gpt":0.40514238023896026,"score_spread":0.3308008664030978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45314234,0.0021270437,0.004435724,0.13558498,0.00026202048,0.00011595695,0.00012768678,0.00009317342,0.40411115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667377,0.00073747395,0.00071956165,0.0064843115,0.000039367125,0.000022470813,0.00002809862,0.000031210282,0.025199732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178374,0.0018095305,0.0001668598,0.00063284626,0.001853972,0.0037530838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921029,0.0039413176,0.00030128754,0.0004218176,0.0014130104,0.0018195283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005425721,0.00028504766,0.00042857518,0.0012092268,0.045544613,0.011344549,0.0026416816,0.0067064646,0.009669828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019269483,0.0003983283,0.0004905449,0.0018723363,0.020449715,0.0037592298,0.008565062,0.008914071,0.0004546066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005067529,0.00010469616,0.011355398,0.00005546659,0.000024805224,0.007491416,0.1599891,0.0013566493,0.0004296892,0.74927956,0.027092712,0.04276986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092373484,0.00007984795,0.022044377,0.00043655557,0.00009264847,0.0027535355,0.27264118,0.009850916,0.0009553742,0.28421172,0.40658626,0.00025521487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9657489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9786203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057783213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057783213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107504025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41924852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325005","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9183","title":"Probing The Data: Perspectives on Race Visibility in Canadian Sentencing Proceedings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Race (biology); Political science; Computer science; Geography; Sociology; Meteorology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06164440170896106,"score_gpt":0.3751106841611557,"score_spread":0.31346628245219466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85439175,0.0031265656,0.0040614456,0.028764252,0.00021907201,0.00020211503,0.00046485898,0.00004670428,0.10872322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868579,0.0015287026,0.001376602,0.001407381,0.000038895927,0.000106839776,0.0001303236,0.00004024037,0.008513093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96791536,0.016227355,0.00091864855,0.001490737,0.008212976,0.0052348436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9568421,0.028247304,0.0038519362,0.0009968496,0.0075897644,0.0024719937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023003032,0.00057411956,0.00068495556,0.008716995,0.054000422,0.01351266,0.003379255,0.0025365949,0.006253823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06790985,0.0008159614,0.0002999147,0.009408256,0.019015227,0.0056086536,0.010983953,0.003920365,0.0003160094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022670625,0.00001000637,0.0044489917,0.000063241,0.0000051870197,0.00047660526,0.9693797,0.00004397021,0.00037608205,0.011898912,0.0018853458,0.011389211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027001572,0.000013946202,0.014813009,0.00022398011,0.000010714197,0.0001681047,0.93986857,0.00012906945,0.00024887803,0.0027083599,0.041760746,0.00005194576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93392557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96717227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07947646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07947646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08658842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5766448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325006","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9262","title":"The Charter of Whites: Systemic Racism and Critical Race Equality in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Charter; Race (biology); Anti-racism; Critical race theory; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.035756434376737485,"score_gpt":0.401090279898057,"score_spread":0.36533384552131953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04733708,0.027841933,0.0030935754,0.19290729,0.0034097398,0.00018456318,0.0019416675,0.00016634759,0.72311777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5299741,0.01868683,0.003342949,0.020168168,0.00051073806,0.00016062667,0.0005894486,0.00028760513,0.4262795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618644,0.00043606048,0.000084682724,0.0003399991,0.0016030965,0.001349819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99372333,0.00089700136,0.00018134974,0.00020211819,0.0032643392,0.0017318457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003649909,0.00043482715,0.00064630894,0.0025085125,0.02962698,0.01158555,0.0021852811,0.002957333,0.020047475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008595504,0.0005291311,0.0004191172,0.00461305,0.008581514,0.0032222515,0.0028711297,0.005243125,0.00084389665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034042947,0.00004312281,0.0029867422,0.00014939807,0.000012971644,0.000109542714,0.008609569,0.0004987455,0.00012523384,0.5344932,0.3901758,0.062761635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014825845,0.000013432257,0.011095161,0.00047761138,0.000018781417,0.000050812843,0.01362911,0.00061639806,0.0002806113,0.04461531,0.92910475,0.00008317533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13064705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13064705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41506088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94791514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325008","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9193","title":"Multi-Functional Access to Justice Centres","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Athabasca University","keywords":"Economic Justice; Humanities; Political science; Computer science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0836400426144008,"score_gpt":0.38977966582438495,"score_spread":0.3061396232099841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19289501,0.002734316,0.033726603,0.01892736,0.0005421993,0.00075366854,0.0015388334,0.0010445112,0.7478375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90701795,0.0012574141,0.010673734,0.0015164585,0.00008788024,0.00013601803,0.00039851165,0.00009616631,0.078815855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495834,0.00074520736,0.00014083092,0.00052791205,0.0015162983,0.002111466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932122,0.00082064496,0.00037380014,0.00067339296,0.002233715,0.002686199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021721232,0.00041688338,0.00041825665,0.0031810545,0.014566799,0.011232141,0.0034324247,0.0016183386,0.041108865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062312353,0.00034471662,0.00060451054,0.004064187,0.008026191,0.004393573,0.012854838,0.0016474538,0.002004349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010056725,0.00011829925,0.021200005,0.0005889793,0.000051172035,0.0012835814,0.026592232,0.0017543448,0.001771001,0.68800247,0.043288257,0.21524915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036413225,0.00013423727,0.041585416,0.00067986373,0.000058360496,0.00097215106,0.031035272,0.00187731,0.0007383952,0.051367227,0.8713888,0.00012642118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58643585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8357834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41356415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03056529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060906753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8319994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325020","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9192","title":"The Edmonton Encampment Litigation and The Charter Claims We Didn’t (Get to) Argue","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021828571736794724,"score_gpt":0.330714318828592,"score_spread":0.3088857470917973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040459555,0.013340653,0.0014561182,0.2179119,0.003256211,0.00007218826,0.00019032754,0.00009626098,0.72321683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31882322,0.0061816494,0.0017406114,0.05432435,0.0005462442,0.000053293723,0.0001740037,0.00008933534,0.6180672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475515,0.0005338489,0.00011148061,0.0005069519,0.0020384777,0.0020541307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793786,0.0007266118,0.00010920803,0.00013222317,0.0006004575,0.0004937166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003277198,0.0004351599,0.00020834505,0.0010518202,0.022196935,0.011022228,0.0020263407,0.008601825,0.013215067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065269815,0.0004703906,0.00050555967,0.0010159019,0.010435622,0.003942378,0.0036484632,0.008200419,0.001052556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018945693,0.000038396345,0.001922638,0.000060444425,0.000008185328,0.0012396727,0.008804309,0.00025856838,0.00034105912,0.67039317,0.28891918,0.027995465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008738978,0.000012673687,0.0029711847,0.00028398435,0.000011817208,0.0002495842,0.0077602617,0.00017830466,0.0004356331,0.012708684,0.9753338,0.000045392928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88260084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94902056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117399156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039397452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06343274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2858498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325040","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9066","title":"JUDGING ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES: OVERSIGHT, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND CITIZEN COMPLAINTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Public administration; Political science; Administrative law; Citizen science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.16068306877390293,"score_gpt":0.4724398080745329,"score_spread":0.31175673930062997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88937205,0.0013510473,0.002917508,0.019364273,0.00016038246,0.0002484692,0.00014648419,0.0000471834,0.086392455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995688,0.00015504035,0.00033272593,0.0010965397,0.000054753873,0.000025227277,0.000022954193,0.000006581399,0.0026181408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9571302,0.018994374,0.0015876812,0.00229611,0.01306475,0.006926808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7566109,0.120023325,0.05043254,0.0059229224,0.057436988,0.009573317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032206718,0.00029882413,0.00042997772,0.0032731441,0.0123277195,0.01154554,0.0019351249,0.0027983526,0.0036927075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13645981,0.00030787746,0.00035592113,0.004081238,0.012322298,0.0035436181,0.0031664502,0.0037731417,0.00033222116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030197934,0.00031858284,0.6507982,0.00026452003,0.0001004228,0.001961006,0.19291744,0.0013552768,0.0006761974,0.05133755,0.024502346,0.07546651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046903766,0.00014350867,0.7722365,0.0004145275,0.000079004894,0.00044553366,0.15476002,0.0033747866,0.00055228075,0.01008908,0.05771656,0.00014129617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68478364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82250446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31521636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045434322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04635122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63414544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326503","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9020","title":"Freedom of Religion in Canada – The Principled and the Pragmatic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Epistemology; Religious freedom; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.01642896819063336,"score_gpt":0.30095924036921995,"score_spread":0.2845302721785866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041204132,0.021615652,0.004207797,0.28081825,0.0018572967,0.00012209047,0.0005387295,0.00006840221,0.64956766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8001046,0.008979467,0.00400933,0.06725087,0.0006002764,0.00008910526,0.00019887676,0.00011233751,0.11865503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911315,0.0013646036,0.00020193678,0.0009533903,0.003191188,0.0031574343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940316,0.0016033539,0.00021157764,0.00030065852,0.0021713786,0.0016814523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004616283,0.00041082682,0.0005352285,0.0016083102,0.03578277,0.015601624,0.0020647733,0.0070237247,0.0059134564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009489827,0.00055312994,0.0005801799,0.0024625256,0.032223724,0.0039860564,0.004901634,0.010534373,0.00037346577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008417925,0.00000845092,0.00049888925,0.00003053541,0.000005032626,0.0001733703,0.0050307787,0.0002487373,0.000076006145,0.9617045,0.026476929,0.0057383943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036376267,0.000014669363,0.004707567,0.0004466115,0.000024113695,0.00014027598,0.008708298,0.0011753691,0.00024520693,0.238335,0.746017,0.00014956786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2330761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2330761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33488333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.889523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326514","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9019","title":"The Democratizing Influence of Intervention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0380645486569132,"score_gpt":0.3638239986170885,"score_spread":0.32575944996017525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04644021,0.0012366057,0.023648245,0.036219962,0.00024378928,0.00013436169,0.00004914299,0.00010179324,0.89192593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98013866,0.00038875072,0.0020073205,0.003289939,0.00016408565,0.000076237084,0.000014410902,0.000036493657,0.013884195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9612692,0.020662831,0.00089539774,0.0051213247,0.007865195,0.0041860463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548026,0.029543865,0.003151885,0.007643269,0.0033418078,0.0015165798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023876062,0.00044806395,0.0006267742,0.0015321801,0.006237702,0.010275728,0.0017606383,0.0048209266,0.0097863795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036023553,0.0003898108,0.0008063987,0.001061317,0.03877652,0.006395528,0.009786501,0.006902394,0.0009345951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012702587,0.000022165603,0.00032754062,0.00004138802,0.000010585388,0.000050674415,0.002451093,0.00030258225,0.0003550067,0.98930186,0.0009709915,0.006153397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008380969,0.00013984724,0.0029816797,0.00037964314,0.00007911579,0.00016764473,0.0035940192,0.0011482476,0.0026556964,0.8112092,0.17751929,0.000041763833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014241137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013974279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023876062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009995529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01662526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12627017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326516","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8359","title":"Exploring the Importance of Criminal Legal Aid: A Canadian Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Criminal procedure; Humanities; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2401937323696118,"score_gpt":0.4306052977341825,"score_spread":0.19041156536457068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05320018,0.06352607,0.0010244518,0.3751419,0.001370106,0.00010098284,0.0011287323,0.00004499925,0.5044626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78488505,0.12479467,0.003009539,0.031555213,0.00048453128,0.00006197899,0.00044580363,0.0000772824,0.054685935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257517,0.0010289937,0.00018755638,0.00044390254,0.0026030475,0.0031614064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98968863,0.0021436024,0.00052484043,0.00016068488,0.0043303594,0.0031518745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005020302,0.00059676176,0.0008046481,0.0063873036,0.019599237,0.012494634,0.0027384118,0.0033613862,0.015146432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012515845,0.0004355043,0.0006267551,0.011454578,0.0129983695,0.0050858194,0.0046669496,0.0059924005,0.0005511963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007570464,0.00008955517,0.013100431,0.0009856082,0.00004388147,0.0012901252,0.026284534,0.00110566,0.0003840238,0.77265257,0.09314441,0.090843506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040961768,0.00006919068,0.045378514,0.0035091932,0.00011573873,0.0007710403,0.09535348,0.0013662766,0.00033720204,0.051243782,0.8015606,0.0002539955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99856865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24261585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24261585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37856376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87845826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326517","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9065","title":"La participation citoyenne des enfants qui défendent leurs droits devant les tribunaux : regard sur le contentieux des changements climatiques","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.13434045401087788,"score_gpt":0.38376784117560797,"score_spread":0.2494273871647301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65358454,0.008638022,0.0035179958,0.05038235,0.00089025294,0.000102547194,0.00009704502,0.00003350353,0.2827538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953234,0.0025077723,0.0006081188,0.0014148101,0.00012296285,0.00006203799,0.000035091394,0.000016744514,0.041998446],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944237,0.0031474987,0.00010811013,0.00034435172,0.0005883003,0.0013880577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964258,0.0011619625,0.00035498117,0.00013842313,0.00083542155,0.0010834535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039261207,0.00036690704,0.0003660233,0.0008331224,0.013393895,0.006211718,0.0009171264,0.0022060734,0.0100206155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006620628,0.00016453321,0.00030838276,0.00081147655,0.008931288,0.0027985307,0.006085705,0.0028450098,0.001006203],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005380793,0.00007105147,0.011284572,0.00019042997,0.00001384469,0.001611093,0.7784941,0.00008970961,0.00090516964,0.1566301,0.008890761,0.04176533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008427159,0.00011013472,0.021626292,0.00060713396,0.000013033133,0.0007401875,0.6641193,0.00012813727,0.00037969384,0.010723791,0.30150086,0.0000429816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03511638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0672942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9648836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004958317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007971571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06982392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326522","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9025","title":"L’évolution de la partie VII de la loi sur les langues officielles : un objectif ambitieux à la recherche de moyens efficaces","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.11911858020465513,"score_gpt":0.35536331980651154,"score_spread":0.2362447396018564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12155536,0.033947896,0.024553373,0.09103391,0.001925031,0.0006015139,0.0010620616,0.000350955,0.7249699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7478878,0.014750519,0.013087365,0.021716107,0.0009464095,0.00072815374,0.0007709812,0.0003267287,0.19978595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856376,0.004864185,0.0007253942,0.001302451,0.005008304,0.0024619454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732785,0.013847745,0.0024110922,0.0019609933,0.0063425032,0.002159056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150604565,0.0005900636,0.00070831535,0.0035259258,0.0062229317,0.011979991,0.0014653207,0.0029652412,0.013042312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02539648,0.0007141791,0.0011360137,0.00295328,0.0073641003,0.0059184143,0.005787255,0.00825081,0.0030382697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014327468,0.0001234455,0.009197478,0.0008595415,0.000069991715,0.00039756834,0.046474133,0.00096202875,0.0029497037,0.78384626,0.027281664,0.12769489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029608647,0.0002703809,0.029460128,0.0018959567,0.00006680835,0.00023674982,0.014041526,0.0005738133,0.0020065303,0.01985702,0.9314471,0.00011431891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10857239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.120456666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89142764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020102438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029685821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21588087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326532","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9067","title":"Un rond dans un carré: l’expérience professionnelle des spécialistes de la justice réparatrice dans le cadre d’un programme québécois de déjudiciarisation pour adultes","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04081260786727914,"score_gpt":0.34879418418495695,"score_spread":0.3079815763176778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9118392,0.00485691,0.0020475283,0.035147127,0.0004634562,0.00010836962,0.00014685624,0.000032994805,0.04535744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97089875,0.0016701642,0.00069411844,0.0047939117,0.00004924424,0.00007374986,0.0000577514,0.00003936471,0.021723043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900034,0.0058226795,0.00018013685,0.0006732461,0.0016425479,0.001678006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913731,0.0026630124,0.0007043305,0.00026469986,0.0023461413,0.0026487047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007071023,0.00029481403,0.00054220256,0.0011104033,0.020684697,0.006678364,0.0010971046,0.0022167957,0.0066988766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011148871,0.0004851364,0.0003156514,0.0014370929,0.016402086,0.004942352,0.0056940946,0.004575067,0.0007897456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024955796,0.000025608591,0.0047933254,0.00007628627,0.000004280482,0.00030101993,0.9772689,0.000024193687,0.0002936937,0.0033319697,0.004656609,0.009199149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046905498,0.00006301723,0.012458341,0.00036709633,0.000007156062,0.00018328194,0.9146929,0.00005509749,0.00013871945,0.0004148788,0.07158293,0.000031899755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6493431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8199012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35065693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026697015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0340647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.705444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326534","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9184","title":"Access to Administrative Justice as an Administrative Law Value: Designing an Inclusive and Accessible Administrative Justice System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Administrative law; Tribunal; Equity (law); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1772834996338298,"score_gpt":0.5093142697938282,"score_spread":0.3320307701599984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23347965,0.0016904704,0.12694179,0.05292806,0.00027856196,0.0010425547,0.00007727895,0.0002933563,0.5832683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528009,0.0005717246,0.030826585,0.0014695998,0.000038296766,0.0001950733,0.000020997988,0.000052005627,0.014024879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879946,0.005454569,0.00025028162,0.00055079657,0.0025615839,0.0031881551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416536,0.001775093,0.00038924103,0.0004338332,0.0010216678,0.0022148232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008182607,0.00035357106,0.00044078103,0.0014880898,0.023252163,0.019449772,0.0025573315,0.0027055857,0.0034691524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010337095,0.00044602828,0.0005207242,0.0013805013,0.036794674,0.006943496,0.013691068,0.0036301923,0.00046125223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013614635,0.00009422227,0.0048243273,0.0001135987,0.000016273045,0.0005429592,0.08916225,0.003525476,0.0009384817,0.8621539,0.0035645491,0.035050265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041094234,0.00013026869,0.011292947,0.0007276163,0.00009770855,0.00044897906,0.1837292,0.008244659,0.0012958372,0.45285,0.34100857,0.00013316626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49131805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68445086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49131805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045932867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11263476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326958","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9064","title":"La clinique juridique comme espace de participation et de médiation","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13858562933235932,"score_gpt":0.5198529398461726,"score_spread":0.38126731051381335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0452025,0.017144553,0.017043713,0.081018254,0.0018614562,0.00035276054,0.00021746817,0.00012836655,0.83703095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78191435,0.0138055105,0.009286365,0.010002447,0.0010610748,0.00065997144,0.00016926353,0.00009997336,0.18300098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898761,0.0059976713,0.00032620312,0.000679666,0.0019560787,0.0011643023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931641,0.002867528,0.00081888883,0.0005357179,0.0010611893,0.0015524611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060686776,0.00042720526,0.00046413208,0.0021481519,0.008135199,0.011177319,0.00132916,0.0040397597,0.016845876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011233285,0.0003277755,0.00042254914,0.0023911132,0.021174906,0.006508381,0.0075976746,0.0050183013,0.0019463301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022891067,0.00006181177,0.0028065345,0.00020421331,0.000010463416,0.00034791185,0.055526372,0.00026883042,0.00030034967,0.879298,0.018423123,0.042729586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021002128,0.00007342427,0.010239179,0.0011711455,0.00001252808,0.00061534403,0.047637567,0.00026284164,0.00028665183,0.15879829,0.78080475,0.000077224024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027135877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037355598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027135877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059464276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020665841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05635512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326970","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9021","title":"Section 15: How Indigenous Use of the Charter Tool is About Returning to Respect Not Creating Equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press; University of Windsor; Yukon University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Equity (law); Repatriation; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Disadvantage; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Law; Sociology; Public administration; High Court; Freedom of information","score_opus":0.10521765265068823,"score_gpt":0.37993091320413935,"score_spread":0.27471326055345113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08401229,0.003426392,0.007323445,0.09329925,0.0015038482,0.00015056154,0.000119321805,0.00015526978,0.81000954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82231146,0.002248282,0.0046054297,0.014192624,0.00020448782,0.000086081294,0.00006662119,0.00015539413,0.1561296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990334,0.0029295995,0.00027986776,0.00088926696,0.0031169457,0.0024502852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993411,0.00254363,0.00044630835,0.0005241116,0.0022033288,0.00087163044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00897924,0.00033152697,0.00030292085,0.000990107,0.019434426,0.0148249185,0.001852703,0.0037137468,0.006012027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012586822,0.00025898582,0.00032385025,0.0013235322,0.042446367,0.004992933,0.0046461155,0.005757451,0.0004924306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011335117,0.000015108366,0.001804,0.0000631958,0.0000049736605,0.00025430776,0.14979151,0.00017435281,0.00031192214,0.80310494,0.023035137,0.021429215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007786569,0.00003497334,0.0057073496,0.00060362654,0.000018731667,0.0003745387,0.09776484,0.00022010437,0.0008146219,0.06254248,0.83183974,0.00007127162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8349822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8563389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16501778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036706742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077303864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33197916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406327004","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9018","title":"The Importance of Effective Access to Justice for Charter Violations and the Role of the Court Challenges Program","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.035966301314531976,"score_gpt":0.3635254641516331,"score_spread":0.3275591628371011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406327004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090597466,0.004397791,0.005844686,0.1625612,0.00046532237,0.00016910497,0.00014212687,0.00008896499,0.73573333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505022,0.0021858313,0.0013167349,0.011655238,0.00019428352,0.00008340688,0.00003206282,0.000046633337,0.03398355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799502,0.0063124024,0.00033497656,0.0010135066,0.0051856367,0.0072033443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96897024,0.01698695,0.0020111492,0.001006774,0.0032374328,0.0077875233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010639507,0.00016669967,0.00044532688,0.002080813,0.019255651,0.020598736,0.0019140817,0.004556756,0.017307067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037975363,0.00031847192,0.00030218097,0.0017245389,0.028444879,0.010071852,0.010650385,0.0081923725,0.0007763725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016440285,0.000075850505,0.004360369,0.000082126346,0.000008015472,0.00046058538,0.027620351,0.0002750921,0.00016485964,0.9015139,0.018126873,0.04729559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004014585,0.00012675021,0.03338371,0.0012488901,0.00004140998,0.00053547765,0.09764343,0.0007269485,0.0004950314,0.31306106,0.55255914,0.00013807806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5320804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6826735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4679196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029223705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097506195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9413505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027655","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9559","title":"“Weaponizing” The Tort of Family Violence? Myths, Stereotypes, Lawyers’ Ethics and Access to Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Economic Justice; Mythology; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.14281429637353224,"score_gpt":0.4633369186579882,"score_spread":0.32052262228445594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027655","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23390731,0.015736077,0.0032042307,0.59947467,0.0007601632,0.000026749325,0.000048254562,0.000023656476,0.14681889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97433215,0.0033825585,0.00038112476,0.018421907,0.00016342029,0.000011400239,0.000008479601,0.000010433788,0.0032885259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007624,0.0048661805,0.00021482595,0.0006915105,0.002407075,0.0017442864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908598,0.005202878,0.0012092186,0.0004956311,0.0013930988,0.00083936803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011544652,0.00028218335,0.00037793632,0.0017225024,0.022496263,0.013765619,0.00215181,0.006254194,0.0018700528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01767007,0.0003809749,0.00027276506,0.0016590813,0.1322015,0.011317797,0.0039490834,0.009384709,0.00022258057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121010835,0.00003215715,0.0039163134,0.000049822644,0.0000072563475,0.00018300944,0.33681515,0.00009789421,0.00018499514,0.63472617,0.009134461,0.014840741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015637464,0.000039086073,0.012234163,0.0010628873,0.00002508927,0.00045832622,0.5602268,0.00037519,0.000560453,0.2496313,0.17526966,0.000101406804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5026046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44983575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5026046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034830905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02510751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027815","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9560","title":"Reflections on the TRC’s Mandate to Law Schools: Microscopic and Macroscopic Changes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11036744324900545,"score_gpt":0.4835372393179259,"score_spread":0.3731697960689205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021964747,0.010782921,0.0025406578,0.933064,0.014168036,0.00022109949,0.00014097981,0.00013256415,0.016985081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.402063,0.010574008,0.008084104,0.5454175,0.0051802346,0.0006203871,0.00018356525,0.000403475,0.027473614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89773756,0.03900397,0.008700734,0.006324301,0.039320093,0.008913434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7684007,0.13502999,0.009100567,0.009649454,0.07030389,0.0075153033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11677225,0.0003955237,0.00076394534,0.0026926973,0.012370914,0.01814918,0.005614837,0.018188467,0.0028615259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.192382,0.0011045297,0.0012971621,0.0034092776,0.0155442385,0.011509966,0.008840538,0.025254982,0.00051679194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075964716,0.00009987716,0.0035000385,0.0021318928,0.00004085911,0.0025521084,0.11638465,0.0009595951,0.0034932208,0.24516568,0.5364605,0.08913568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014036943,0.000058754613,0.0031783713,0.0013203465,0.000018945311,0.00026588468,0.028929425,0.00022785134,0.0013183202,0.0071516116,0.9573941,0.00012228567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12646891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1278179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12646891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051107384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083077945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61755806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027943","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9558","title":"Homegrown Transplants: Procedural Borrowing in the New Ontario Class Proceedings Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Humanities; Computer science; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02304629522989342,"score_gpt":0.3038252372376791,"score_spread":0.2807789420077857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031343553,0.0023914198,0.0063709375,0.04169326,0.0006328141,0.000281226,0.00055350526,0.00012896652,0.91660446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5599899,0.0029067271,0.009831288,0.031867933,0.00061155314,0.000347932,0.0003998292,0.0001147428,0.39393014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906641,0.0008697684,0.0004275664,0.00066003867,0.0056768837,0.0017016932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926456,0.0033588624,0.00045946232,0.0006914984,0.0020903798,0.00075418997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005791907,0.00028341578,0.0002807,0.00095921935,0.009561395,0.007479349,0.0022279941,0.005195297,0.0071982024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010567487,0.00055777637,0.00046416878,0.0013670498,0.01275625,0.0021697723,0.0030155485,0.0049989983,0.0008330806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015641053,0.00002289854,0.0016099226,0.000054665998,0.0000057554985,0.00029072695,0.005149463,0.0004283567,0.0004642127,0.91039705,0.059809554,0.021751763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004351326,0.000034864865,0.01019711,0.00027448352,0.00003604993,0.00018768506,0.0026151193,0.00096460816,0.0005957603,0.047485657,0.9374482,0.0001169981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91067827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97011405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08932173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055161398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11597216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40022588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027959","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9182","title":"Reducing The “Justice Gap” Through Access to Unbundled Legal Services: Utilizing an A2J Measurement Framework to Measure Unbundling Effectiveness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Unbundling; Measure (data warehouse); Economic Justice; Business; Computer science; Telecommunications; Environmental economics; Political science; Database; Industrial organization; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1968630646339921,"score_gpt":0.44799136096002223,"score_spread":0.2511282963260301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55519277,0.005985688,0.10048972,0.03659448,0.0007664352,0.006129935,0.007633143,0.00024351486,0.28696436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960411,0.0011266049,0.029047895,0.0022713442,0.000081995975,0.0025541608,0.00086890097,0.00005562175,0.0035825216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92103285,0.031851985,0.0050556124,0.0037302908,0.033273518,0.0050557693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89736074,0.03771801,0.012374155,0.005349544,0.04178957,0.005407869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055282243,0.00068044115,0.00084707286,0.009268381,0.009875728,0.010124728,0.0025859196,0.0015262411,0.0059469067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10546738,0.00034028367,0.0013429685,0.012212244,0.0136258975,0.0075532612,0.00886289,0.0035776363,0.00057021267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021847745,0.00079024426,0.3792464,0.0021402135,0.0005513686,0.0002394498,0.061513867,0.0030810493,0.0010705473,0.30574876,0.020329513,0.22507013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012951034,0.0010564376,0.6663559,0.005316435,0.0007369878,0.00028273097,0.10143013,0.013020487,0.0028540932,0.09750331,0.11084987,0.0004639678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6099742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65916336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6099742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037391048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060044095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78464544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5251154","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4617","title":"The Sovereign, the Law and the Two British Empires","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Empire; Legitimacy; Colonialism; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Popular sovereignty; British Empire; Sociology","score_opus":0.025787596882030635,"score_gpt":0.34401413658256424,"score_spread":0.3182265397005336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5251154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09397266,0.03141337,0.0012808864,0.052764416,0.0008543355,0.00001944554,0.00006707019,0.000032942262,0.819595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8960034,0.006125828,0.00055393775,0.004174164,0.00017998739,0.00002672484,0.00003498541,0.000026871716,0.092874065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975279,0.0009855147,0.00007595438,0.00026019345,0.00048191307,0.00066840195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998645,0.00052112405,0.0001400477,0.00015557616,0.00022787467,0.00031045385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014552508,0.0002356381,0.0003214534,0.0009994422,0.006441104,0.008002601,0.00046601886,0.0018215774,0.0027431585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032899354,0.00025607308,0.00011832852,0.001134746,0.019081287,0.003611153,0.0023079463,0.0040620314,0.00041242957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002060924,0.000015284206,0.00092094846,0.000037572845,0.0000038620205,0.00020983849,0.013493056,0.00007033201,0.00011085164,0.9590009,0.011590499,0.014526247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023691882,0.000024580322,0.0102557605,0.00041915785,0.000011231476,0.00030617398,0.01662383,0.00030018447,0.00017584942,0.16726416,0.80455565,0.000039709525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26888815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3574048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26888815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015353183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009367888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5346461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W69389177","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4533","title":"De-Conflicting Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Legislation: Khawaja and the Ongoing Challenges of the ‘Armed Conflict’ Exclusion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Legislation; Legislature; Armed conflict; Statutory law; Law; Counter terrorism; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04089942561944922,"score_gpt":0.33388674869970314,"score_spread":0.29298732308025394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W69389177","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18271813,0.035715736,0.0020991694,0.48436898,0.0024894339,0.00019846144,0.0006854195,0.00010136626,0.29162332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7658791,0.015307255,0.0035802005,0.08871534,0.000527274,0.000072875926,0.0002836827,0.00009156044,0.12554267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932028,0.00061693555,0.0001564713,0.00032373413,0.0034121242,0.0022878565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99213517,0.002152063,0.0003688138,0.00023591142,0.0031952206,0.0019129019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038423082,0.00025710277,0.00050421193,0.0011469857,0.031804144,0.012871409,0.002620202,0.0049112584,0.003955982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074354815,0.00042774683,0.00043221496,0.0019791939,0.010956564,0.0021907412,0.0028444487,0.0069290306,0.0003254011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111474845,0.00011612594,0.014232503,0.00067404803,0.000056543046,0.0019049123,0.06250594,0.0007828182,0.0020226,0.5434696,0.26363912,0.11048433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029145605,0.000026932845,0.0276242,0.0004350851,0.00003414714,0.00022944827,0.031417184,0.00041492796,0.00073150656,0.011443124,0.9274769,0.00013744169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99122506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11156578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11156578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2976101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8094702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W84822421","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4361","title":"ESSENTIALISM MAKES FOR STRANGE BEDMATES: THE SUPREME COURT CASE OF J.A. AND THE INTERVENTION OF L.E.A.F.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Ideology; Conservatism; Jurisprudence; Law; Intervention (counseling); Convergence (economics); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047730681184722394,"score_gpt":0.36511387138368107,"score_spread":0.31738319019895866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W84822421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24437809,0.004536317,0.00562884,0.24505202,0.0011851043,0.00005380843,0.00010327293,0.00006421627,0.4989983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535873,0.0005718119,0.00047768425,0.019701425,0.000118737415,0.000011552162,0.000013095832,0.000024021569,0.025494479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471223,0.0013399381,0.00006912691,0.00058626954,0.0010068776,0.0022855522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979832,0.0008699957,0.000112289745,0.00011370161,0.00034989178,0.000570891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043351767,0.0003102947,0.0004583022,0.000778201,0.03884611,0.0075071095,0.0016945129,0.009040228,0.0030158395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00712886,0.00047854672,0.0005919737,0.00062629295,0.03669294,0.0040663937,0.00437692,0.011814285,0.00030424062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002935813,0.0000147806195,0.0012217846,0.000015023778,0.000006197528,0.0014233341,0.06729059,0.00007300561,0.00023738768,0.90977496,0.015199044,0.004714674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009282106,0.00007358299,0.008813087,0.0003905014,0.000086624175,0.0015877722,0.19312544,0.0006933077,0.001752837,0.25632057,0.53689325,0.00017018648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7620394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88256776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23796058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029447814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02891343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47872394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94846784","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4615","title":"The State of War Crimes Following the Israeli- Hezbollah War","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; War crime; Proportionality (law); Geopolitics; Law; State (computer science); International humanitarian law; International law; Politics; Spanish Civil War; Just war theory; Argument (complex analysis); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.030853394486466457,"score_gpt":0.3538859219393146,"score_spread":0.32303252745284816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94846784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378406,0.0075305,0.00010653344,0.011780932,0.00019539637,0.000025824404,0.00050234445,0.000009209854,0.042008713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296546,0.0031224338,0.000035425124,0.00057495997,0.00016439757,0.000010292216,0.00021140333,0.000003938404,0.0029116566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999124,0.00017781521,0.0000466452,0.0000777482,0.00022410054,0.00034964326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746156,0.00055454724,0.0011323779,0.00008273102,0.0005103489,0.00025848282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010281134,0.000138716,0.00020853743,0.0023159534,0.0024241738,0.004277461,0.00068813306,0.0010455631,0.004978458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048909723,0.00019033726,0.00013197778,0.0019532542,0.0033427784,0.0020836946,0.0019859767,0.0016710996,0.00041214403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008315872,0.0006065327,0.58580214,0.00046795316,0.00011098519,0.0026412075,0.0790653,0.00087186083,0.0010134728,0.07792781,0.03655151,0.21410958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036595226,0.00015451899,0.86658967,0.0004614299,0.000026476713,0.0010673683,0.0591842,0.00040002595,0.00068992004,0.0069796676,0.06433041,0.00007978145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05316557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0738368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05316557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004007213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017712978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105712175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}