{"meta":{"query_hash":"4e40e7f818e1","filters":{"venue":"World Congress on Internet Security"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4e40e7f818e1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=World+Congress+on+Internet+Security"},"results":[{"id":"W1534832567","doi":"","title":"Dirt Jumper: A key player in today's botnet-for-DDoS market","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Congress on Internet Security","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jumper; Botnet; Dirt; Denial-of-service attack; Malware; Computer security; Computer science; The Internet; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01486545933491781,"score_gpt":0.2561276824901237,"score_spread":0.24126222315520587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534832567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76856375,0.011392851,0.033172704,0.02598073,0.0010309588,0.00034329292,0.0011365059,0.0044422355,0.15393695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326308,0.0051787575,0.01401824,0.005008621,0.00061459624,0.00005211272,0.0009477769,0.00057335064,0.040975798],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987901,0.00009723461,0.000031633124,0.00018270739,0.00066621084,0.00023213061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693346,0.0007463051,0.0006312648,0.00039956588,0.000687278,0.0006020551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001325605,0.00035441606,0.0003035725,0.0024705457,0.0018524315,0.0035761865,0.0005644137,0.0016102914,0.003462214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035586164,0.00031154443,0.00018073077,0.0020563398,0.0021278842,0.005871564,0.0016316148,0.0022063344,0.001020164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006810993,0.0003582367,0.07273416,0.0004546555,0.000050862047,0.0062071807,0.007840314,0.0029556092,0.03626372,0.117856055,0.09312837,0.6614698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045656383,0.0010856015,0.088610545,0.00050006295,0.00006969148,0.013714183,0.0048377668,0.018033916,0.04470586,0.02610491,0.8019988,0.00029309787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018531528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034380516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035761865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016906342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095719856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012266517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547865016","doi":"","title":"Smart crawlers for flash-crowd DDoS: The attacker's perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Congress on Internet Security","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Botnet; Denial-of-service attack; Application layer DDoS attack; Computer science; Trinoo; Computer security; Visitor pattern; Perspective (graphical); Crowds; The Internet; Flash (photography); Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.020820896805356627,"score_gpt":0.2801787821027747,"score_spread":0.25935788529741804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547865016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68934375,0.004967055,0.2461935,0.0067511466,0.00023131588,0.00040165999,0.00025744326,0.0036052342,0.04824889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724488,0.0009504194,0.022589661,0.00030095407,0.000054841632,0.000038709855,0.000084540356,0.000093029514,0.003439082],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989936,0.00044136227,0.000041479234,0.00015104878,0.00026633652,0.000106233834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955611,0.0022744024,0.00042708937,0.0008482492,0.000562555,0.00032659966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013380094,0.0006765689,0.00067737984,0.001212455,0.0009085767,0.002227157,0.00074869127,0.0018847075,0.0020445425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005868759,0.00034746522,0.00028369855,0.00039142036,0.0011970395,0.0060994495,0.001077382,0.00086286676,0.00078966387],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010892057,0.001856576,0.06866686,0.0017896411,0.0002859729,0.0040266057,0.0054924656,0.17688572,0.12283625,0.15501526,0.026945759,0.43510976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009984518,0.0012201334,0.019176261,0.0003637301,0.00015884418,0.0048844446,0.005150151,0.7863352,0.05276548,0.06954332,0.060125727,0.00017684694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081003254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013967415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002227157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000532346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047785655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007076144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553078271","doi":"","title":"VLUS: Visual location-based URL screening tool for improved WWW security","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Congress on Internet Security","topic":"Advanced Malware Detection Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Download; Malware; Exploit; Sophistication; World Wide Web; Credibility; Computer security","score_opus":0.015567730612545107,"score_gpt":0.29575328955172614,"score_spread":0.280185558939181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553078271","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":"software","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06035548,0.00082802214,0.45552704,0.00063294504,0.0003598761,0.00042740136,0.0026565061,0.46897036,0.010242359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5047087,0.0005778971,0.46525654,0.0006016602,0.0002145884,0.00043968498,0.0035237265,0.010470856,0.014206348],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990144,0.00022522085,0.00006895252,0.0001132027,0.0004516274,0.00012668179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971692,0.001346905,0.00033089018,0.0004354209,0.00044397835,0.00027352295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010154538,0.0013542649,0.0008374442,0.004264282,0.00040105317,0.0011569252,0.0015020209,0.0011090919,0.012756677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054690517,0.0004975814,0.0005312268,0.0009875186,0.00041654432,0.0022017392,0.002098186,0.00081355113,0.0047630253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022950266,0.000495725,0.007949365,0.0008648855,0.00011522748,0.0014226191,0.0008674859,0.005736573,0.092253335,0.0060425256,0.13733605,0.7446212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006419286,0.0016069043,0.022484519,0.00062917895,0.00028444175,0.004776807,0.0006171893,0.40868744,0.3405502,0.0122658,0.20665467,0.00080095127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009830719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001342158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012756677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038086306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052606926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042675316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1685618866","doi":"","title":"Bayesian networks for modeling failure dependency in access control models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Congress on Internet Security","topic":"Access Control and Trust","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Access control; Computer science; Bayesian network; Dependency (UML); Role-based access control; Dependency graph; Formalism (music); Distributed computing; Notation; Graph; Theoretical computer science; Software engineering; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03371165638053294,"score_gpt":0.3264810295537586,"score_spread":0.29276937317322566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1685618866","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060661775,0.0003041561,0.9903666,0.00049486075,0.000031501448,0.000054421424,0.00026339517,0.00015048264,0.0022685218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6267391,0.0025962337,0.35545555,0.00043742647,0.00037623887,0.0010230067,0.001422764,0.00021198817,0.011737751],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593496,0.0021556078,0.00020238418,0.0006769589,0.00077455374,0.0002554346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98400474,0.012947239,0.0013982276,0.0005347474,0.00081742334,0.00029752502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072974493,0.0017628068,0.001652115,0.0032040118,0.00106762,0.0027009528,0.0029062943,0.0027142032,0.0050523533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027332366,0.0012937099,0.0018015049,0.0031173606,0.0022467128,0.0057214866,0.0019348788,0.0038262717,0.00082340254],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059998827,0.000045966644,0.0011839232,0.00006270319,0.000073550174,0.00014302417,0.00018956623,0.72953534,0.00030873882,0.25511274,0.0010850267,0.012199404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008734456,0.0000092763985,0.00014540431,0.000014285318,0.000017480252,0.000022064869,0.0000139275435,0.9003133,0.000061778555,0.098555826,0.0008260418,0.000011940476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020578746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019741274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020578746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038198791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018388272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040917933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740504981","doi":"","title":"Collusion threat profile analysis: Review and analysis of MERIT model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Congress on Internet Security","topic":"Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Insider threat; Insider; Computer science; Figure of merit; Computer security; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Political science; Law; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.021338652222625012,"score_gpt":0.29244837561259507,"score_spread":0.2711097233899701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740504981","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006434422,0.9655952,0.013649948,0.0041628303,0.0003105197,0.00015349295,0.00032821542,0.00007372353,0.00929171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.084598586,0.900562,0.011972879,0.00078511133,0.00046209147,0.00023908926,0.00039199827,0.00003844068,0.0009498807],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622595,0.0013210269,0.00057992555,0.0004172303,0.0013470203,0.000108979526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662947,0.026875736,0.0024005834,0.00066073646,0.0035408894,0.00022735106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068000304,0.0011387256,0.0020606539,0.017599318,0.0006997149,0.003140345,0.002329925,0.0016604008,0.0022615532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022670656,0.00060763303,0.0018762981,0.012194167,0.0015861434,0.004280791,0.0012485512,0.0015030976,0.00065878156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121861,0.00015343592,0.010820272,0.032472655,0.0005960459,0.0004019966,0.0015072386,0.00317676,0.00030646898,0.044923823,0.014137702,0.89138174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005752133,0.0007054281,0.05664185,0.10750379,0.0037771056,0.0043019415,0.0057511763,0.024478562,0.0018779464,0.11834541,0.6761453,0.0004139417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005218348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004957529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017599318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039362744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005096103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035962403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1864102666","doi":"","title":"The study of evasion of packed PE from static detection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Congress on Internet Security","topic":"Advanced Malware Detection Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Executable; Evasion (ethics); Computer science; Packed bed; Static analysis; Engineering; Operating system; Programming language; Chemical engineering","score_opus":0.016008123505972423,"score_gpt":0.2816407390279107,"score_spread":0.2656326155219383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1864102666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7422671,0.0011396703,0.2391022,0.0012154263,0.00012864692,0.00015606382,0.000094249786,0.0007883638,0.015108337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869032,0.0002364321,0.011538038,0.00007729591,0.000053512467,0.00002749945,0.000038144848,0.000059340608,0.0010665329],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971842,0.00071130577,0.00009460527,0.0003007088,0.0014222494,0.00028696546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97307444,0.017807892,0.00355789,0.0030320988,0.0021732585,0.00035438142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001516997,0.0005825315,0.00072109775,0.0014824204,0.00063131057,0.001207383,0.001006588,0.00107466,0.0009807625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027047986,0.00037739408,0.0004631635,0.00078337983,0.0022481382,0.0029931718,0.0013591995,0.0017671612,0.00019381875],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005459069,0.00040310938,0.05565761,0.00060267973,0.00019098872,0.0030783555,0.0019412984,0.37353513,0.06787317,0.24704678,0.004812372,0.2443126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105726685,0.00030267352,0.00535921,0.000038499376,0.000024685136,0.0015615018,0.00019333474,0.9402708,0.011904557,0.03868137,0.0016217573,0.000031102787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012472947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006036116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001516997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007913954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006088217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008022726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119543896","doi":"","title":"Compartmentalization architectures for protection of Internet credentials and transactions from CPU resident malware: Providing foolproof protection for critical credentials and transactions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Congress on Internet Security","topic":"Security and Verification in Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Department of National Defence","funders":"","keywords":"Malware; Compartmentalization (fire protection); Computer science; Computer security; The Internet; Internet privacy; Operating system","score_opus":0.050987604004236915,"score_gpt":0.30927590223148166,"score_spread":0.25828829822724475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119543896","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36730933,0.003869437,0.58411497,0.0009497867,0.0005601471,0.00087083795,0.0002368575,0.025325201,0.016763413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9109348,0.0008816456,0.07006483,0.0003639741,0.000102272235,0.00019981526,0.00023698481,0.0004497164,0.016765937],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987638,0.00013974616,0.000120625176,0.0001957322,0.00048494982,0.00029524424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936127,0.0008552787,0.0010117618,0.0029893068,0.0012702724,0.00026075446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000724084,0.0009464501,0.00056578586,0.0013058095,0.001323081,0.0026714162,0.002522955,0.0012403434,0.0058027604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00271987,0.00068522815,0.0004531237,0.0006688072,0.0015245795,0.004258679,0.0024284546,0.0018503001,0.0025299739],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002917655,0.0005929436,0.008631015,0.00080150017,0.00019382712,0.0013009061,0.0023699712,0.018368138,0.5100341,0.06978136,0.019613324,0.36539522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011472038,0.0014148881,0.0036562674,0.00017880702,0.00028151038,0.0028524818,0.00047982574,0.15174873,0.75164044,0.018005384,0.06937151,0.00025547933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012550475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001566079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058027604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016267635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011028675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01941216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137108635","doi":"","title":"The implementation of a full EMV smartcard for a point-of-sale transaction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Congress on Internet Security","topic":"User Authentication and Security Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Smart card; Computer security; Payment; Database transaction; Card security code; Computer science; Authentication (law); Contactless smart card; Credit card; Payment card; Internet privacy; Business; Database; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01871984450470906,"score_gpt":0.301759228874489,"score_spread":0.28303938436978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137108635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90684235,0.00013220738,0.04992645,0.00081506744,0.00024141671,0.00055716536,0.00019351777,0.001688743,0.03960313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749459,0.00003283497,0.016609902,0.0001611847,0.000018943349,0.00004760114,0.00012135107,0.0000666183,0.007995637],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785244,0.00060400186,0.00015255211,0.00026969105,0.00081079296,0.000310549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584925,0.0009885462,0.0003094864,0.0017552753,0.0008782108,0.00021916465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012383029,0.00023663053,0.00022697108,0.00039332503,0.0005833783,0.0017635209,0.0009783291,0.0011241314,0.0068199355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067697032,0.0002457115,0.00019331765,0.0003000597,0.0006430142,0.0027832694,0.0014708044,0.00093634264,0.002108869],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034858112,0.0021545605,0.054315493,0.00042430914,0.000114556635,0.0055548544,0.0031950101,0.010343952,0.21062604,0.08658639,0.012764849,0.6104342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005602712,0.013192637,0.13231128,0.0002910145,0.00023118815,0.013883469,0.003942085,0.16471866,0.36668804,0.0141122155,0.28964594,0.00042321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005869858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054304325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068199355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006343406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007168384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02281493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W860031154","doi":"","title":"Secure decommissioning of confidential electronically stored information (CESI): A framework for managing CESI in the disposal phase as needed","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Congress on Internet Security","topic":"Recycling and Waste Management Techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Computer security; Information security; Portfolio; Computer science; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Finance","score_opus":0.010234237379706274,"score_gpt":0.31334429518014506,"score_spread":0.30311005780043876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W860031154","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012369385,0.000320894,0.9758571,0.0016257388,0.00006724906,0.000572038,0.00008058267,0.0005583995,0.008548569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1800514,0.0006604414,0.81302464,0.00020338593,0.00007688382,0.0004797483,0.00024561776,0.000086215834,0.005171697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944878,0.0017919831,0.00068594684,0.00074892497,0.0017408045,0.0005445548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485236,0.000795914,0.0010583587,0.001649839,0.0011694169,0.00047404022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077285687,0.0009749797,0.0006443126,0.003583536,0.0027814487,0.00972162,0.0032999984,0.0024452156,0.0018810807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006040993,0.0006070192,0.0015443556,0.0018636707,0.004603817,0.010937384,0.0046870247,0.0021607063,0.0009266461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008076075,0.00024289062,0.0027606273,0.00034275628,0.000054789165,0.00059652043,0.0030305798,0.026745284,0.006853504,0.81019354,0.004865622,0.14423305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000657721,0.00068503956,0.0037004435,0.0014012594,0.0002043428,0.002050435,0.006030114,0.2896266,0.02807421,0.49812728,0.16972576,0.00030881292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004373489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041836244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00972162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025426925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008525442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04087305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}