{"meta":{"query_hash":"dac5892efbde","filters":{"venue":"World Political Science"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dac5892efbde","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=World+Political+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1989824334","doi":"10.1515/wpsr-2012-0006","title":"Neo-liberalism, Semi-clientelism and the Politics of Scale in Mexican Anti-poverty Policies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"United Nations Development Programme","keywords":"Clientelism; Politics; Poverty; State (computer science); Political science; Democratization; Democracy; Political economy; Public administration; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015583186695726944,"score_gpt":0.32595075608962126,"score_spread":0.3103675693938943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989824334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43634,0.0015100498,0.015389367,0.033415195,0.00006562979,0.00006027413,0.000025725865,0.00005702043,0.51313674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795914,0.00006830776,0.00025769172,0.00016821593,0.000010845285,0.000013623079,0.000001266733,0.0000034981222,0.0015174537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964143,0.0022603292,0.00005669648,0.00025164444,0.0005106741,0.00050638866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960737,0.002045488,0.00063702243,0.0004665229,0.00039952598,0.0003777319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006347436,0.00012858427,0.00019620603,0.00077006745,0.003983687,0.005404411,0.00038562328,0.00085879705,0.0027383754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048678583,0.00014676565,0.00015066464,0.00096287375,0.022844717,0.0016469557,0.0038728681,0.0018630269,0.000084208164],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010472735,0.000012037203,0.0009373413,0.0000106163025,0.0000032378477,0.000029105888,0.002912998,0.00031132795,0.00015412454,0.9908738,0.00031221102,0.004432822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005309511,0.000045225563,0.011732319,0.00012533159,0.000014045825,0.00006107591,0.012425383,0.002520117,0.0006572218,0.90446013,0.06788534,0.000020850703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006777662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007938051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00820412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00820412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043078125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05952531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000979703","doi":"10.2202/1935-6226.1066","title":"The Dialectics of Multicultural Identity: Learning from Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Newspaper; Nationalism; Globe; Dialectic; Identity (music); National identity; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Law; Art","score_opus":0.012125746627652883,"score_gpt":0.26462205094661945,"score_spread":0.2524963043189666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000979703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5810946,0.0053515076,0.001820007,0.05174329,0.00027667294,0.0000579787,0.00016603219,0.000033483957,0.3594563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870946,0.0012180205,0.00033923137,0.0010516271,0.000012343276,0.0000094142815,0.000031408214,0.000016578484,0.010226722],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954365,0.0014105813,0.00007257585,0.000383662,0.0011301539,0.0015664601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946631,0.0019991947,0.00031991047,0.00018498796,0.0015193067,0.0013134448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039456673,0.0004265906,0.00044225052,0.001960772,0.046786327,0.01064272,0.0013526202,0.0018256675,0.0044086813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008261907,0.00029540993,0.0002500363,0.0035862527,0.02257063,0.004689726,0.006737946,0.004649572,0.00026657063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044608663,0.00002853539,0.0069218674,0.0000726421,0.000008089909,0.0005389021,0.8239237,0.00027888367,0.00028196044,0.13377257,0.009373659,0.024754563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008535983,0.000012313968,0.007673343,0.0002263539,0.000014236525,0.00013882945,0.8128554,0.0003408695,0.00038074423,0.0137284305,0.16457033,0.00005061005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98999643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14709312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14709312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15634385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073034202","doi":"10.1515/wpsr-2012-0014","title":"Towards a Representative Bureaucracy: Promoting Linguistic Representation and Diversity in the Swiss and Canadian Federal Public Services","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Linguistic diversity; Bureaucracy; Rationalization (economics); Multilingualism; Public service; Politics; Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Linguistics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.04205599565328958,"score_gpt":0.3407879908283974,"score_spread":0.2987319951751078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073034202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75028664,0.0009298416,0.007149343,0.036904097,0.00024279417,0.0004320008,0.00013150921,0.00011116616,0.20381254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889893,0.00010410343,0.0009993153,0.0008951915,0.000017797822,0.000040531555,0.000023504734,0.00001287656,0.008917339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98310167,0.0052699926,0.00029269347,0.0008594589,0.004064133,0.006412171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854241,0.003081474,0.0010105446,0.00060333224,0.004400654,0.005479929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013362207,0.00026397195,0.00025384713,0.0027717485,0.033580355,0.010907893,0.0015640715,0.0017991816,0.004600855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015228013,0.00032621986,0.0003073748,0.0019623842,0.014346554,0.0018805241,0.0064425175,0.0023192645,0.00026228858],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024136466,0.00025084123,0.052291248,0.00016918845,0.00004487441,0.0013171097,0.18648967,0.0030641116,0.0036346074,0.63592404,0.036512557,0.08006041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014400482,0.00022650817,0.17828046,0.0006600932,0.000079059304,0.00049623137,0.29237467,0.0095557915,0.003165032,0.03429131,0.48038,0.00034683538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9313265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96505183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11099014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11099014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16444972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80529356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084049396","doi":"10.2202/1935-6226.1052","title":"Freedom of Expression and Shock Radio: Quebec CHOI-FM as a Case Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Argument (complex analysis); Expression (computer science); Freedom of expression; Democracy; Symbol (formal); Populism; Political science; Freedom of the press; Sociology; Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Human rights; Linguistics; Computer science; Physics; Politics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03228200257731553,"score_gpt":0.34246914646235493,"score_spread":0.31018714388503943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084049396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7453677,0.0024425972,0.0021724547,0.010780816,0.00017056655,0.000359341,0.0005332055,0.000033130986,0.23814018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948342,0.0008325483,0.001054446,0.0013971444,0.00003090759,0.00013250746,0.00010717198,0.00001503867,0.048088193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644333,0.001469845,0.000048778686,0.00022590318,0.00066992897,0.0011421384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997265,0.0016000397,0.0001749842,0.00010673693,0.0004948591,0.00035828882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019693521,0.0005470489,0.0004300011,0.0015488333,0.020172652,0.0052411333,0.0016836326,0.005170524,0.007094091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003858203,0.00023943516,0.0003810312,0.0031276185,0.0071326313,0.0013038856,0.0020819372,0.0027534962,0.00043992826],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042402672,0.00083995366,0.03442649,0.00058377674,0.000076404285,0.038787503,0.2720768,0.0051716715,0.003743943,0.5177382,0.07240403,0.053727183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015828988,0.0002464353,0.044088792,0.0005296814,0.000061008435,0.0037444464,0.38502377,0.0037075586,0.0019778304,0.007151419,0.5531216,0.00018907952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9768355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055854566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055854566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017391449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40525514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317390700","doi":"10.2202/1935-6226.1086","title":"History of the Word \"Democracy\" in Canada and Québec: A Political Analysis of Rhetorical Strategies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Elite; Rhetorical question; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011347642094046217,"score_gpt":0.24948379780691426,"score_spread":0.23813615571286806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317390700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49435043,0.023133427,0.0024133578,0.049185015,0.0006455164,0.00010115154,0.0016011569,0.00011969926,0.42845023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97408664,0.002556984,0.00043854798,0.0008717115,0.000048307862,0.000014827561,0.000130137,0.000034766654,0.021818118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822944,0.00039058295,0.000046235786,0.0001602989,0.0005963875,0.0005769404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402326,0.0022178914,0.0004317333,0.00012188169,0.0026221557,0.0005832144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019208156,0.00028589982,0.0002972772,0.0051928647,0.017585596,0.007504286,0.001278016,0.0014575432,0.006248935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067214514,0.00020415799,0.00019318149,0.007709978,0.010202893,0.0015852186,0.0012697303,0.0021715641,0.00026626987],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016259264,0.00005138889,0.027845135,0.00035451286,0.000066628876,0.0010744279,0.3289526,0.0010561148,0.0014910602,0.45162198,0.061441507,0.12588203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014038111,0.000027100696,0.07781516,0.00042034345,0.00005589742,0.00021419152,0.09953477,0.0010877626,0.00087442127,0.0058587994,0.81396866,0.00012890263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99754876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8173615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18263851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11099282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9480235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323854666","doi":"10.1515/wps-2015-0005","title":"Social Movements and Political Opportunities: Lesbians, Gays and the Inclusion of Sexual Orientation in the Québec Charter of Human Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Lesbian; Charter; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Human rights; Jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Political science; Homosexuality; Gay rights; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05861772373071554,"score_gpt":0.3319666576865493,"score_spread":0.27334893395583376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323854666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60465455,0.006022971,0.0003969399,0.07713728,0.0002616913,0.00003247972,0.00026322113,0.000012647765,0.31121814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98741907,0.00072258606,0.000057970738,0.0012189107,0.000028225131,0.000004726236,0.000018710945,0.0000037964533,0.010526021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866724,0.0004643042,0.0000117208,0.00006158432,0.00018457678,0.0006106907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983564,0.00032894756,0.0002257161,0.00003279056,0.00037232967,0.0006837481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013562577,0.00021128578,0.00016783476,0.0015291264,0.017143646,0.00644369,0.00071678683,0.0013205702,0.010197839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016650216,0.00017113448,0.00016025675,0.0015097075,0.015262941,0.0011453638,0.0020248573,0.002083504,0.00021304331],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009015449,0.0001868073,0.078554586,0.000090742,0.000025403864,0.000806404,0.18348715,0.00038419958,0.00061122974,0.6631222,0.036409076,0.036232136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040990322,0.000052435815,0.24446663,0.00055891386,0.000038349695,0.00017575051,0.34620428,0.0007527969,0.00043567276,0.020967433,0.38620123,0.00010552861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06082552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06082552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0464948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4413221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345542358","doi":"10.1515/wps-2016-0001","title":"The Controversy over Religious Arbitration Tribunals in Ontario: Unspoken Identity-Based Justifications?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Opposition (politics); Islam; Faith; Sociology; Identity (music); Law; Political science; Religious identity; Compulsory arbitration; Epistemology; Negotiation; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.024485303344638817,"score_gpt":0.3369978418985137,"score_spread":0.31251253855387484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345542358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50528634,0.0033565077,0.0014977928,0.16705224,0.0006035138,0.00009692216,0.00029961683,0.000020735777,0.32178634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97894865,0.0006660592,0.00027198225,0.0040774234,0.00008060601,0.000018387793,0.00002869418,0.000012381732,0.015895808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941251,0.0012527292,0.0002348051,0.0005201314,0.0021313867,0.0017357824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832924,0.0080216555,0.0015949111,0.00061866984,0.004669375,0.0018030155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065921694,0.00018710321,0.0003951056,0.0014752588,0.02531901,0.010321297,0.0017069806,0.003821854,0.0062254947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016893588,0.0003187298,0.00023190037,0.0027610995,0.020400176,0.0025825985,0.004006659,0.0035454435,0.00019425576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015738844,0.000057531088,0.025398055,0.00029758696,0.000038360606,0.0017056875,0.31258133,0.00025250134,0.0011153314,0.5994692,0.034146484,0.024780594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006718682,0.000029255725,0.054721955,0.00074488454,0.0000642428,0.00022342552,0.3516572,0.000747091,0.001076761,0.0297851,0.56075007,0.00013281124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98858404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13336974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13336974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08592314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770995900","doi":"10.1515/wps-2017-0010","title":"Justice, Gender, and Corporations. Outline of a Feminist Political Philosophy of the Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Egalitarianism; Business ethics; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.17155304739089874,"score_gpt":0.40546738973641117,"score_spread":0.23391434234551242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770995900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027972978,0.04410197,0.11210779,0.34846807,0.002366848,0.00033189758,0.0001267433,0.00006650758,0.4644572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90362126,0.01261268,0.031270124,0.018306712,0.0019077982,0.00071792305,0.00004184201,0.000045548855,0.031476084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949538,0.0036874637,0.00010160907,0.0003150662,0.00067409396,0.00026789762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658847,0.0022154634,0.00028555305,0.00016560023,0.00044673847,0.00029815003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010843977,0.00059267465,0.00059327116,0.002246296,0.005511571,0.0073885745,0.0012605356,0.0055069416,0.0026395759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031808065,0.0003727796,0.0005027041,0.0011466045,0.060084213,0.007742953,0.00430699,0.0061635654,0.0003826091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011541024,0.00000752985,0.000033177534,0.000008966964,3.1384758e-7,0.000014273685,0.0011330431,0.000084671316,0.000016989066,0.9970862,0.00043495328,0.0011787871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004592496,0.000012037259,0.00014553608,0.00010242282,0.0000011020907,0.000034646033,0.0020589698,0.0004836564,0.000052371357,0.94483936,0.052259643,0.0000055650453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035707701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032765998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010843977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007404766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005315071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057349145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962455424","doi":"10.1515/wps-2019-0003","title":"“The Foundations of Freedom and Civilization”: The Durham Report, Municipal Institutions and Liberalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Political radicalism; Legislature; Law; Political science; Civilization; Parliament; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political economy; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03400152398804058,"score_gpt":0.3614343968340776,"score_spread":0.327432872846037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962455424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07524429,0.10023809,0.0011447733,0.3660458,0.002825532,0.000038109138,0.0004049604,0.00007844232,0.4539799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239065,0.015199858,0.00045991395,0.007103058,0.0011906915,0.000027137707,0.000073830575,0.0000376257,0.052001394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968079,0.0014729446,0.000083163686,0.0001734618,0.0007342688,0.0007282997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663526,0.0019261725,0.0002571227,0.00021095181,0.0006226742,0.00034787008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025138312,0.0003142153,0.0002447102,0.001411002,0.008858413,0.00942762,0.001020338,0.0031703839,0.0042018527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043406426,0.0002522221,0.000118623495,0.0021135693,0.0134321535,0.0027778759,0.002663095,0.003663771,0.00036601495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011907354,0.000009939047,0.00054165674,0.00006759358,0.0000032119685,0.00017937514,0.020082556,0.00014274383,0.000061610896,0.86290014,0.1074359,0.008563323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056847566,0.000008014201,0.003333045,0.00028561265,0.0000060933894,0.00009307978,0.026126914,0.00016399384,0.00022304394,0.043092217,0.92662907,0.00003326911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52021176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62811494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47978824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027987076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015451483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9652276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}