{"meta":{"query_hash":"dac5892efbde","filters":{"venue":"World Political Science"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dac5892efbde","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=World+Political+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1989824334","doi":"10.1515/wpsr-2012-0006","title":"Neo-liberalism, Semi-clientelism and the Politics of Scale in Mexican Anti-poverty Policies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"United Nations Development Programme","keywords":"Clientelism; Politics; Poverty; State (computer science); Political science; Democratization; Democracy; Political economy; Public administration; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015583186695726944,"score_gpt":0.32595075608962126,"score_spread":0.3103675693938943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989824334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68732995,0.00021943307,0.000020410922,0.026168058,0.0003439415,0.0002179133,0.00002560727,0.00003109085,0.2856436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910055,0.00004487675,0.00035074537,0.006180108,0.00034431578,0.000007801573,5.9972893e-7,0.0000075996622,0.0020584757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963271,0.0002467268,0.00035756358,0.00022271198,0.00079770875,0.0020481718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791306,0.0007627855,0.00008945868,0.00028105156,0.000102941216,0.00085070793],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025846614,0.00013583244,0.00030544522,0.00013826307,0.00078163994,0.00010431473,0.00058117695,0.000057828587,0.00008363053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008874583,0.00009576962,0.00008916905,0.001345846,0.0146885505,0.00035821975,0.00023818247,0.00023010312,0.000008396703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017335208,0.000049497066,0.05771663,0.000004971547,0.0000022686925,1.4749102e-7,0.012727073,8.7543145e-7,0.00004481652,0.9290814,0.00026970624,0.00010091722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012990256,0.000042364845,0.6718878,0.00010432256,0.000051936913,0.000008515788,0.027016195,0.0005543283,0.0013950794,0.20738831,0.08960235,0.0006497712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03510012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066673895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72169304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025027504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036722198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000979703","doi":"10.2202/1935-6226.1066","title":"The Dialectics of Multicultural Identity: Learning from Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Newspaper; Nationalism; Globe; Dialectic; Identity (music); National identity; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Law; Art","score_opus":0.012125746627652883,"score_gpt":0.26462205094661945,"score_spread":0.2524963043189666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000979703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6987471,0.0003030943,0.000021582468,0.032139797,0.0015912887,0.00015880776,0.000012952406,0.000045144112,0.2669802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99124753,0.000010989245,0.000038473463,0.0004732976,0.00018135231,6.7496717e-7,3.998683e-7,0.0000013007815,0.008045982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982843,0.00007138212,0.00013431946,0.0001360773,0.0007368113,0.00063713006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901605,0.0002859084,0.000043279677,0.000106555046,0.00011902361,0.00042918255],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005246538,0.00004273741,0.00007550905,0.00008849623,0.0028111788,0.00044450714,0.0004988558,0.000016645836,0.000117824275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016716106,0.000038173595,0.000030640575,0.000830587,0.0025663888,0.00028848613,0.00002860576,0.00015011075,0.000011390854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015055871,0.000007648388,0.0009854715,5.481042e-7,0.0000014701551,0.0000032544876,0.0016076213,0.0000049275072,0.0002405276,0.9931871,0.0017149157,0.0022449782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089996865,0.000017149696,0.18297707,0.0000148144445,0.000014126618,4.1547102e-7,0.0044409977,0.00007286231,0.00018516301,0.01751875,0.7945087,0.00015995039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99811107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9756684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016785617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034828833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073034202","doi":"10.1515/wpsr-2012-0014","title":"Towards a Representative Bureaucracy: Promoting Linguistic Representation and Diversity in the Swiss and Canadian Federal Public Services","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Linguistic diversity; Bureaucracy; Rationalization (economics); Multilingualism; Public service; Politics; Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Linguistics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.04205599565328958,"score_gpt":0.3407879908283974,"score_spread":0.2987319951751078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073034202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8393851,0.000041978154,0.0000047096146,0.04994629,0.00011041043,0.00038557866,0.000006456533,0.000016984113,0.110102475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977821,0.0000031208533,0.00007577087,0.0015812126,0.0001585703,0.000018427994,6.15717e-7,0.0000024857197,0.00037768416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975698,0.0002242903,0.00016065006,0.0003561973,0.00058049476,0.0011085883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847376,0.00029524768,0.000045540724,0.00014135428,0.00014023243,0.0009038538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013847665,0.00008541362,0.00011745646,0.00011281495,0.0017496151,0.0007729923,0.00041624127,0.000034035198,0.000039973875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00182228,0.00006319984,0.000017042728,0.000820485,0.0015190224,0.0006179099,0.00024053766,0.0001503842,0.0000109291905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6333864e-7,0.000009014496,0.20314725,0.0000077854065,0.0000010663549,0.000006846059,0.01425914,4.4893508e-8,0.00000694343,0.782054,0.000040739007,0.00046668405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008860075,0.000011122285,0.882619,0.0000284578,0.0000029464109,0.0000040413706,0.0053686257,0.000311648,0.00001016754,0.10954537,0.0019109356,0.00009907281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97821975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8291891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6794718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030072138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039438021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084049396","doi":"10.2202/1935-6226.1052","title":"Freedom of Expression and Shock Radio: Quebec CHOI-FM as a Case Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Argument (complex analysis); Expression (computer science); Freedom of expression; Democracy; Symbol (formal); Populism; Political science; Freedom of the press; Sociology; Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Human rights; Linguistics; Computer science; Physics; Politics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03228200257731553,"score_gpt":0.34246914646235493,"score_spread":0.31018714388503943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084049396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96076035,0.000050209346,0.00003540039,0.0011007212,0.00025454746,0.00029322063,0.0000025344596,0.000049476224,0.037453514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952404,0.000003114691,0.00050934654,0.0001921436,0.00017862451,0.000007314453,2.512347e-7,0.0000044411436,0.0038643656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976674,0.00017784392,0.0002623729,0.00034222982,0.0009131249,0.00063702895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985401,0.00026132856,0.000070516006,0.00025616525,0.00013043685,0.0007414534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009590298,0.00010306452,0.00017975982,0.0002097908,0.0011147914,0.00007552841,0.00032541857,0.0000420591,0.00023195797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010206144,0.00008322509,0.000037426133,0.00074037595,0.003624452,0.0006680531,0.00014896423,0.00012148919,0.000024742072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021856666,0.0004758901,0.029267767,0.000008746111,0.000003288837,0.00051179656,0.025699863,0.000004911866,0.0047742263,0.9360428,0.002022496,0.0011663963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01076578,0.002634088,0.4401295,0.0007778931,0.00016786066,0.0030352338,0.3394402,0.0036182273,0.034292378,0.10208658,0.059608784,0.0034434767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1684088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03639324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8339562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013756553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047415428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317390700","doi":"10.2202/1935-6226.1086","title":"History of the Word \"Democracy\" in Canada and Québec: A Political Analysis of Rhetorical Strategies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Elite; Rhetorical question; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011347642094046217,"score_gpt":0.24948379780691426,"score_spread":0.23813615571286806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317390700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8850785,0.00006663341,0.000001729768,0.0067567937,0.0005896167,0.00006421515,0.0000146519305,0.0000050385847,0.107422836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99620503,0.000001536423,0.000027068425,0.00029225857,0.000040140832,0.0000016546945,1.3407764e-7,0.0000021178855,0.0034300347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812675,0.00007692133,0.0002523233,0.00019794819,0.00064637564,0.00069969805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875134,0.00030982427,0.000059524853,0.0002199274,0.00009039539,0.00056898367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058663427,0.000059731647,0.00021210242,0.0006155958,0.0002578212,0.000048327714,0.00048957096,0.00003354521,0.00047687266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061924837,0.00005561196,0.00006403087,0.0020094605,0.007526064,0.0001745216,0.00007170365,0.00024517486,9.962743e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001654842,0.000015696653,0.058492497,0.000004369952,0.0000057531174,0.0000016479157,0.0010693668,0.0000011558726,0.00016583283,0.93954194,0.00050266064,0.00019743892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006482636,0.000004831907,0.8968513,0.000009286256,0.0000742582,5.9307354e-7,0.0026058268,0.000108217784,0.000020104211,0.007440779,0.09270346,0.00011649729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93210113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00683061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046678416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323854666","doi":"10.1515/wps-2015-0005","title":"Social Movements and Political Opportunities: Lesbians, Gays and the Inclusion of Sexual Orientation in the Québec Charter of Human Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Lesbian; Charter; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Human rights; Jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Political science; Homosexuality; Gay rights; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05861772373071554,"score_gpt":0.3319666576865493,"score_spread":0.27334893395583376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323854666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88901716,0.000030049307,0.0000043904297,0.01724329,0.00006567935,0.0001538621,0.00001198162,0.000003916245,0.09346969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973601,6.9437425e-7,0.0000050254666,0.00068107416,0.00009086538,0.0000041467774,8.761884e-7,0.0000015324025,0.0018556656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982057,0.00034304796,0.00021955208,0.0001420092,0.00069485843,0.0003948208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932176,0.00017218132,0.000056738776,0.00009692346,0.00008888737,0.00026350867],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034380842,0.000048862734,0.00012237241,0.00021390543,0.0016094982,0.000102868165,0.00028417775,0.000026430977,0.000044283486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018345364,0.00003470652,0.000015429205,0.00033051526,0.010531177,0.0001999952,0.00014380275,0.000087442946,0.0000010949221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043166706,0.000023000684,0.001075201,0.0000054532316,9.126383e-7,0.000001145008,0.046144724,1.561137e-8,0.00002889153,0.9521134,0.0003426798,0.00026024703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024782515,0.00022988845,0.14744176,0.000053593736,0.0000548803,0.0000038516787,0.14984883,0.0000715414,0.00009465429,0.5483117,0.15106952,0.00034153328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84798956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91659516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4038017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042098833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000888873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345542358","doi":"10.1515/wps-2016-0001","title":"The Controversy over Religious Arbitration Tribunals in Ontario: Unspoken Identity-Based Justifications?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Opposition (politics); Islam; Faith; Sociology; Identity (music); Law; Political science; Religious identity; Compulsory arbitration; Epistemology; Negotiation; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.024485303344638817,"score_gpt":0.3369978418985137,"score_spread":0.31251253855387484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345542358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25307813,0.00011244805,0.005288069,0.07737661,0.0014352674,0.0009198953,0.000013165646,0.00014487393,0.6616315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950786,0.00001603153,0.00010290425,0.0011284625,0.00009249006,0.000031413674,0.0000011755957,0.0000038641506,0.0035450268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741995,0.00014733632,0.00029530647,0.00030708188,0.0009303696,0.0008999315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818134,0.0009542311,0.00007751307,0.0002704892,0.00019137628,0.0003250759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00260337,0.00008947517,0.00010353126,0.00019166808,0.0010159203,0.00036727826,0.0005836756,0.00004567616,0.00010129707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020578532,0.000055052624,0.00005604566,0.0009899035,0.0023283844,0.0007183669,0.000031570875,0.0001120944,0.00010088506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001231587,0.000030660853,0.0136991525,8.0157196e-7,7.888794e-7,0.0000011714957,0.00034554585,0.0000025033498,0.0007531932,0.9834525,0.001348862,0.00035252023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083108153,0.00003336099,0.27535325,0.000053591517,0.000016615004,4.095253e-7,0.00054587825,0.000090607115,0.0009776673,0.6706144,0.05125609,0.00022700187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3794555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90759444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74200046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016171171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018788262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85790294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770995900","doi":"10.1515/wps-2017-0010","title":"Justice, Gender, and Corporations. Outline of a Feminist Political Philosophy of the Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Egalitarianism; Business ethics; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.17155304739089874,"score_gpt":0.40546738973641117,"score_spread":0.23391434234551242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770995900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043415118,0.00002162676,0.00012246142,0.042082433,0.0006237492,0.0002579614,0.000076018325,0.000023461382,0.91337717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756795,0.0000021228316,0.00035463294,0.0012919013,0.00041265602,0.0000040618456,7.4561893e-7,0.000005225358,0.00036068892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974179,0.00013626918,0.0003813968,0.00027908315,0.0009335824,0.00085173885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976446,0.0004786667,0.00025058156,0.00057618093,0.00034224225,0.0007077096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016390663,0.000110984955,0.00021248586,0.00009763628,0.0022324047,0.00015247664,0.0009518913,0.00008775377,0.000028576893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005899932,0.00008412192,0.00007196769,0.0003916585,0.022490028,0.0003792225,0.0002957819,0.00025526655,0.0000065514046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067876163,0.00006783741,0.008232217,0.000038549537,0.0000027805781,7.525368e-7,0.0003934057,3.3568924e-7,0.00019843626,0.9909835,0.00003558986,0.000039825136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014749433,0.000030496149,0.05574522,0.000040969833,0.000047771646,0.0000015778513,0.00044537024,0.00010385286,0.0010854589,0.941361,0.00088581606,0.00010493771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019224051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003662282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001168606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010376213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962455424","doi":"10.1515/wps-2019-0003","title":"“The Foundations of Freedom and Civilization”: The Durham Report, Municipal Institutions and Liberalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Political radicalism; Legislature; Law; Political science; Civilization; Parliament; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political economy; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03400152398804058,"score_gpt":0.3614343968340776,"score_spread":0.327432872846037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962455424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52361923,0.00009126317,0.00008363468,0.018560944,0.0004288073,0.00025953603,0.000008013584,0.000028185852,0.45692042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931502,0.000019850793,0.00012006271,0.00055698,0.00008603402,0.000007776649,4.8637907e-7,0.0000020700495,0.0060565597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984729,0.0001364423,0.0002234255,0.00019856963,0.00038076547,0.00058788166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812686,0.0010708106,0.000053500793,0.0003033957,0.00012530127,0.00032011955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020054951,0.00006236539,0.00008562116,0.0000522595,0.0021333904,0.00020479286,0.0004066333,0.000025970194,0.00008087719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027442,0.000038006583,0.000023649509,0.0007177623,0.0135452,0.0004279901,0.00016802286,0.000121241996,0.000014149022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013371572,0.000008880151,0.003233807,0.0000021499948,0.0000016326791,6.9538464e-7,0.00080232,0.000005351381,0.00004283213,0.9957612,0.000024584091,0.00011517608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014079979,0.00002810568,0.078558885,0.00004312339,0.000017354982,0.000022079928,0.0020474198,0.0006209826,0.00008328791,0.65536004,0.26292285,0.00015508871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028080672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024497588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46953097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006123054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045862608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}