{"meta":{"query_hash":"9f95eafc7eaa","filters":{"venue":"World Politics"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9f95eafc7eaa","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=World+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1601135641","doi":"10.1017/s0043887109000136","title":"Seeing Double","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Persuasion; Thriving; Politics; Plea; Promotion (chess); International relations; Political economy; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Social science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03802653347067322,"score_gpt":0.33443010595984657,"score_spread":0.2964035724891734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601135641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050255368,0.008104193,0.009154566,0.09593728,0.018851943,0.00008077134,0.00046054964,0.00089435524,0.86149085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11049766,0.0065437285,0.004007726,0.060655,0.005940289,0.0001459451,0.00060343096,0.0012793262,0.81032693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960496,0.0011809915,0.000106122374,0.00079454895,0.0010664992,0.00080218364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614006,0.00070580095,0.00025843963,0.0008890288,0.00086501945,0.0011416908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031827409,0.0011023617,0.00084511616,0.0017481421,0.013256816,0.015636373,0.0017643514,0.0055155214,0.20397583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010066129,0.0004861059,0.0010100477,0.0013485022,0.010708402,0.02286853,0.016550025,0.010441681,0.06663621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006867208,0.000046419525,0.0006330101,0.0001546282,0.000021852757,0.00039190054,0.010765304,0.00005413532,0.00039351845,0.291491,0.6193295,0.07665001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039903534,0.000008832115,0.0001337157,0.00010353887,0.0000048182633,0.00022422185,0.0038511956,0.00002374919,0.000096919735,0.019711,0.975828,0.000010136514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033769913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055990503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20397583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030644275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003216484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6823671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976033918","doi":"10.1353/wp.2003.0016","title":"Beyond the Policy Frontier: Canada, Mexico, and the Ideological Origins of NAFTA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Ideology; Political economy; Legitimacy; Foreign policy; Political science; Politics; Legitimation; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Power (physics); Derogation; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.009696759324410834,"score_gpt":0.2604055048838702,"score_spread":0.2507087455594594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976033918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47903216,0.013651526,0.00097145006,0.10199596,0.00036338813,0.000053924345,0.00035944884,0.00004509399,0.4035271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980448,0.0035081315,0.00039342316,0.0031859637,0.00004959209,0.000019942214,0.000064358544,0.000022270071,0.012308318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998204,0.00024297992,0.000021131682,0.00019488603,0.0003592713,0.0009776498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986487,0.0003208614,0.00014209503,0.000051473424,0.000504938,0.00033191155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019476505,0.00026441022,0.00031187278,0.0017325686,0.032286946,0.01101461,0.001082259,0.0026827098,0.0025255962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003680334,0.0001976379,0.00024373406,0.0025853529,0.017218465,0.002903877,0.0032197484,0.0049871844,0.00008305071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072639,0.000027618918,0.010101387,0.00008083105,0.00001764293,0.0010540939,0.07784421,0.00055533054,0.00027308727,0.8747978,0.015385174,0.019790005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042770273,0.000029873501,0.044165906,0.0009485693,0.00008066676,0.0004180607,0.24323842,0.0010139289,0.00071134244,0.051314503,0.6578546,0.00018130058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12931523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12931523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10482518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93825203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036707819","doi":"10.1017/s0043887111000207","title":"Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation”: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Democratization; Politics; Constitution; Monarchy; Mass mobilization; Political science; Political economy; Institutional change; Constitutional monarchy; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Public administration","score_opus":0.15277915427547326,"score_gpt":0.37348418430323344,"score_spread":0.22070503002776018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036707819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6881979,0.0027937465,0.0019880827,0.025209177,0.00016005503,0.00008821142,0.000036056284,0.000041730797,0.281485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916248,0.00020930902,0.00015325427,0.00084659224,0.000028459575,0.00001958219,0.000006042157,0.000009252116,0.0071027116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881848,0.006279511,0.00025033698,0.0005156314,0.0015108874,0.0032587647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99466443,0.0032422475,0.0006410112,0.00036273722,0.00052853755,0.00056111213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067620478,0.00021263842,0.00041357012,0.0017455112,0.018227506,0.012399241,0.0009917581,0.0064609544,0.0030187254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01588576,0.00043167063,0.00025669445,0.0023027565,0.050157085,0.0034864596,0.0062951883,0.004438236,0.00033489743],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008075363,0.000084203755,0.0030418185,0.0000656853,0.000009631455,0.0008449887,0.18549778,0.00064524665,0.00072595896,0.7938651,0.003175988,0.011962851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018762158,0.00033441582,0.06719386,0.0006101772,0.00006422443,0.00051971705,0.2227188,0.0018605741,0.0024718929,0.18783106,0.5159447,0.0002628748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24952915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3359442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24952915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036048573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013863238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49615347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092187954","doi":"10.1017/s0043887111000190","title":"How States Ration Flexibility: Tariffs, Remedies, and Exchange Rates as Policy Substitutes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Currency; Economics; Politics; International economics; Falling (accident); Space (punctuation); Exchange-rate flexibility; International trade; Business; Monetary economics; Law; Political science; Exchange-rate regime","score_opus":0.12260282407934735,"score_gpt":0.24649640651832747,"score_spread":0.12389358243898012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092187954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2801214,0.011168758,0.103911616,0.05164395,0.0007333095,0.00010450631,0.00040995554,0.00029803917,0.5516085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857238,0.001403718,0.0038147296,0.001222134,0.000112665315,0.00003386296,0.000025772173,0.00006684716,0.007596465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965532,0.0020285677,0.000119621945,0.00042932003,0.0003558679,0.0005133601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315405,0.0037043188,0.0013943363,0.0009150244,0.00035866117,0.00047366266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004293629,0.00073855737,0.0011162922,0.0013264517,0.002085708,0.017650183,0.0011875463,0.0062621883,0.011540969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014627349,0.00080887176,0.001164179,0.0015974925,0.011227084,0.0181217,0.004824293,0.0054549295,0.0008577405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055022716,0.00001520318,0.0005020412,0.000025919406,0.000019192317,0.000037925234,0.00025241871,0.004026072,0.00013622202,0.98936975,0.00079686736,0.004763225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004049751,0.000027090675,0.0005072589,0.00005926076,0.000039748244,0.000036475423,0.0004120481,0.0050532036,0.00019510905,0.9864892,0.0071144593,0.000025657962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029246022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027391503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017650183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040894193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018323306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03860843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107456962","doi":"10.1353/wp.2002.0011","title":"Bargaining, Uncertainty, and Property Rights in Fisheries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Commons; Property rights; Politics; Bargaining power; Exclusive economic zone; Tragedy (event); Common-pool resource; Political science; State (computer science); Economics; Geography; Law and economics; Political economy; Fishery; Sociology; Law; Biology; Social science","score_opus":0.017475371289322708,"score_gpt":0.19729167030439923,"score_spread":0.1798162990150765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107456962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18027915,0.014063968,0.04064144,0.052086808,0.00028051628,0.00006314841,0.00008008312,0.00002555281,0.7124793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98956573,0.0019114072,0.0010070199,0.00069631374,0.00013382846,0.00004070335,0.000009517879,0.000005275843,0.006630198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967727,0.0018513172,0.00010337489,0.0002484967,0.00047417724,0.00054989784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918196,0.006781434,0.0006713607,0.00022759096,0.00025701144,0.00024301004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006596546,0.0003422424,0.0004077369,0.0011169992,0.0056078793,0.008262235,0.0008757234,0.0040428764,0.005638432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012992321,0.00028587258,0.00039343096,0.0018071437,0.02689059,0.00902215,0.0043586413,0.0026428115,0.0003054299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069087714,0.000007311976,0.00023099263,0.0000069891903,0.0000021181754,0.000039661423,0.00078191137,0.0011907055,0.000025618578,0.9957475,0.00031330503,0.0016469907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000549498,0.0000056654967,0.00032111874,0.000028219252,0.0000021767198,0.000014181171,0.0010431018,0.00072565675,0.000037400157,0.99249977,0.005311054,0.0000061334854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008122849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006554496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008262235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068333754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028388873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04957986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124134613","doi":"10.1353/wp.2006.0022","title":"All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1491,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Government (linguistics); Inequality; Argument (complex analysis); Social mobility; Political science; Language change; Social inequality; Law","score_opus":0.07227951299783576,"score_gpt":0.3780763563438561,"score_spread":0.30579684334602036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124134613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5546191,0.0066833375,0.0070617814,0.090719745,0.00058754114,0.000068018686,0.00023452319,0.0000333809,0.33999255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961293,0.00042597737,0.00018860117,0.0009783373,0.000039031376,0.000010423182,0.000016229877,0.000003798326,0.0022082636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930623,0.0038416327,0.00030018954,0.00038027682,0.0010872569,0.0013283319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780872,0.007469557,0.0076420484,0.0013663422,0.002268983,0.0031659524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031632022,0.00020754698,0.00042502925,0.0009889266,0.004017625,0.006225492,0.000500071,0.0014398427,0.0050553842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020608079,0.000110508496,0.0003012507,0.0012834027,0.008092528,0.004775721,0.0042807343,0.0019554975,0.00045054767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018787039,0.00030398453,0.12747434,0.00029158284,0.00015670534,0.00065989635,0.030497981,0.0015508594,0.00021746819,0.7432414,0.014160542,0.08125733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063029875,0.00025106856,0.16449429,0.0011577164,0.00012256754,0.0010155737,0.048864182,0.0034763818,0.00067513506,0.6694617,0.11027597,0.00014228284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010327938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00645143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010327938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039092232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036225168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028363585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142520604","doi":"10.1353/wp.2001.0019","title":"Politics, Pressure, and Economic Policy: Explaining Japan's Use of Economic Stimulus Policies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Stimulus (psychology); Business cycle; Politics; Economics; Fiscal policy; Democracy; Political economy; Economic policy; Macroeconomics; Political science; Public economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.0663970434400754,"score_gpt":0.35683411031855594,"score_spread":0.29043706687848053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142520604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8761656,0.0007943911,0.002689585,0.007546196,0.000043618573,0.00006288344,0.00008684422,0.000033779477,0.112577006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816954,0.00027444854,0.00024220554,0.0001707804,0.000020844833,0.000018218452,0.000016081929,0.0000038868047,0.0010840292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987903,0.00045854325,0.000064759384,0.00010906558,0.00018569072,0.0003915745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786335,0.00081511284,0.00073745183,0.00010949186,0.00021644251,0.0002581099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017892417,0.00023486874,0.00026597656,0.0015286241,0.0018149846,0.0028087145,0.00042035175,0.0011223413,0.003821133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005238412,0.00021902399,0.00029422884,0.001673052,0.0039008786,0.0014700918,0.0015479805,0.00092478376,0.00024143458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014684425,0.00034869136,0.2501277,0.00018632539,0.00006662906,0.0011226726,0.022489978,0.010712473,0.0017848547,0.6668692,0.004408034,0.04173654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020649748,0.0003297425,0.7118541,0.00015821285,0.00014471082,0.00026207193,0.029027414,0.04342389,0.0011405685,0.1452805,0.06805635,0.000115917464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027709099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025136197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027709099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038959587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020457278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055095613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147911685","doi":"10.1017/s0043887113000130","title":"When Can Liberal States Avoid Unwanted Immigration? Self-Limited Sovereignty and Guest Worker Recruitment in Switzerland and Germany","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Settlement (finance); Immigration; Immigration policy; Political science; State (computer science); Political economy; Politics; Normative; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.02623975281773169,"score_gpt":0.30009580017268955,"score_spread":0.2738560473549579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147911685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83362216,0.0011874774,0.0022448844,0.02653673,0.00014384327,0.000040066338,0.000017569999,0.000031890704,0.13617542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967668,0.00013240117,0.000095112046,0.0008524837,0.000017363083,0.000012930853,0.0000038848607,0.0000043365753,0.0021147048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675566,0.0014112557,0.000054092383,0.00021702546,0.00017926069,0.0013827399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984946,0.00079029,0.00023600811,0.000086250955,0.00007883149,0.00031401243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046268865,0.0002122473,0.00024416763,0.00091178756,0.008973768,0.006803738,0.00065957155,0.0032348912,0.004460327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004696992,0.00020212424,0.00028954708,0.00057589664,0.018902272,0.0037644908,0.0063139186,0.0027613044,0.00021423389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013013619,0.0000812753,0.016759345,0.00007647846,0.000015889947,0.0011045896,0.08957175,0.00074316835,0.00072490406,0.8677196,0.0034597684,0.019613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023072759,0.00040950344,0.14692691,0.00129447,0.000090407055,0.0008114086,0.30017826,0.0038082348,0.0032677075,0.3341179,0.20867458,0.00019001863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022720166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042123992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022720166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005895332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032425558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04517585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155714298","doi":"10.1017/s0043887100009382","title":"The Evolving Arms Control Agenda: Implications of the Role of NGOS in Banning Antipersonnel Landmines","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disarmament; Treaty; Political science; Arms control; State (computer science); Principle of legality; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Control (management); Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.012475916228543927,"score_gpt":0.2977759546292174,"score_spread":0.2853000384006735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155714298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11090118,0.0077930344,0.010374134,0.3062378,0.0016954989,0.00013813845,0.000035247296,0.000023623597,0.5628014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95802754,0.0043495004,0.0038081757,0.015991567,0.0004891028,0.00013425414,0.0000149751095,0.000035802008,0.01714902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.985349,0.0089221215,0.0002883391,0.0010648803,0.0015351482,0.0028405352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98114496,0.013912681,0.0012031966,0.00052590447,0.0013406253,0.0018726423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026125586,0.0006915178,0.00037828452,0.002119855,0.0147616025,0.021294348,0.0020697666,0.0105058085,0.005821615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017389493,0.000454385,0.0006750295,0.001938491,0.038958464,0.018621044,0.009828867,0.010242867,0.00038375633],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031590807,0.00005863599,0.0018863769,0.000099462864,0.000006063884,0.0006260972,0.029567871,0.0006211031,0.0003378744,0.9528588,0.0021512508,0.011754844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005879343,0.00011499925,0.004979122,0.0012137176,0.00002543274,0.0002907699,0.20307969,0.0015842572,0.0009530678,0.5240105,0.263603,0.000086677435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014520375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022329476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026125586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013979103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012602073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1381669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159468002","doi":"10.1017/s0043887113000221","title":"Banks and the False Dichotomy in the Comparative Political Economy of Finance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":256,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Capitalism; Financial crisis; Politics; Economics; Financial market; Flexibility (engineering); Capital market; Market economy; Financial system; Capital (architecture); Business; Economic system; Finance; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.025882656805694234,"score_gpt":0.2488283133531295,"score_spread":0.22294565654743526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159468002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24172345,0.026107427,0.03933436,0.14714423,0.000813167,0.000022408312,0.00014832793,0.000052315583,0.5446543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99259734,0.0014603785,0.0013795943,0.0018642222,0.0003024,0.000020733194,0.000014048032,0.000013778303,0.0023474908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338526,0.004961637,0.000104679704,0.0003880431,0.0007754052,0.00038494036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99148655,0.0065882537,0.00047728745,0.00076057715,0.0004239647,0.00026331886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007856814,0.00016441324,0.00036152787,0.002554273,0.0027745743,0.007894221,0.00052294834,0.0019417031,0.003109001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012324242,0.00019265137,0.0002647702,0.0019222943,0.027391246,0.008417931,0.0035275393,0.0021153109,0.00023028791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055432465,0.0000018182774,0.00021221055,0.00000551552,0.0000010845251,0.000007189795,0.00063619344,0.00006794122,0.000012652103,0.9964301,0.00040304355,0.0022167047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063510934,0.000005230219,0.0011153142,0.000036742396,0.0000021313238,0.000028459799,0.0010870378,0.00034786155,0.000040737516,0.9816961,0.0156298,0.0000041287212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015367753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015146075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007894221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003005846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012569478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041551292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170984522","doi":"10.1353/wp.0.0004","title":"Courts and Judges in Authoritarian Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Legitimacy; Independence (probability theory); Bureaucracy; Power (physics); Political science; Judicial independence; Democracy; Accountability; Empowerment; Rule of law; Meaning (existential); Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.025589725471138473,"score_gpt":0.32374625112437155,"score_spread":0.2981565256532331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170984522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16672198,0.04569747,0.0047660423,0.0936273,0.00087368535,0.000052938074,0.00005211188,0.000042816504,0.68816566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726337,0.004593399,0.00051854865,0.0036956072,0.0005522575,0.000037343765,0.000011068523,0.000012947426,0.017945105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871177,0.008578982,0.0004105677,0.0006944335,0.0017005018,0.0014978008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791823,0.015184206,0.0019409627,0.00060200517,0.0017150006,0.0013755548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082206605,0.00011947377,0.0003960755,0.0019450596,0.007402439,0.012548647,0.0008596063,0.0036578039,0.0031229835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021481333,0.0003495997,0.00019377569,0.002551399,0.024870055,0.005120988,0.0035223905,0.004327321,0.00030428357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009311387,0.000012702664,0.00077378756,0.00002941127,0.000002655852,0.00008757669,0.008432254,0.00012977418,0.000059204198,0.98179996,0.004044642,0.0046187057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070045324,0.00006255477,0.006847081,0.0004064502,0.0000140714355,0.00018710025,0.013295997,0.00060604064,0.00023583036,0.7885375,0.18970393,0.00003348731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006085275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011972684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012548647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006360122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059833834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046146154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172022682","doi":"10.1017/s004388711100027x","title":"If Money Talks, What Does It Say? Varieties of Capitalism and Business Financing of Parties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Payment; Politics; Capitalism; Political economy; Economics; Finance; Market economy; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.02890135535054482,"score_gpt":0.22384647929242626,"score_spread":0.19494512394188146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172022682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9372457,0.0007126572,0.0011433085,0.002869654,0.00002654116,0.000009123341,0.00003234379,0.000008783586,0.05795183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994547,0.00010204303,0.0000623983,0.00005122802,0.000010645952,0.0000026412547,0.0000045856627,0.0000027663855,0.0003090662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977894,0.001289184,0.000053882464,0.00015295195,0.0003285877,0.00038596668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922112,0.0046856888,0.0018789277,0.0003222333,0.00033500203,0.0005670552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023870014,0.0001365265,0.0002376149,0.001910145,0.0017865212,0.0071185604,0.0003137268,0.0008254762,0.0024314807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0148790665,0.00018418349,0.00017165141,0.0016130636,0.008946993,0.005081628,0.0017269466,0.0009874589,0.00022225779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046756014,0.00013733009,0.3819857,0.00015414617,0.00013045824,0.0004646779,0.14616366,0.00074523693,0.0023974814,0.3700159,0.0021765714,0.09516132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037432605,0.00014249643,0.65246975,0.00033998745,0.00008192181,0.0006206417,0.18799376,0.0012266787,0.0010886287,0.12817466,0.027748015,0.00007595845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027324609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028990984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071185604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015273802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055620575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0126238465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467890892","doi":"10.1017/s0043887116000058","title":"Learning to Love the Government","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum wage; Labour economics; Economics; Collective bargaining; Trade union; Wage; Social Democratic Party; Competition (biology); Wage share; Politics; Efficiency wage; Industrial action; Opposition (politics); Statutory law; Political economy; Market economy; Democracy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013640100559586086,"score_gpt":0.2868243868557578,"score_spread":0.2731842862961717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467890892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028597295,0.0021222252,0.005129439,0.2275424,0.0018486226,0.000025612595,0.000051531795,0.000121456374,0.73456144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7089048,0.0017851732,0.0014070993,0.07960752,0.00084061804,0.000047428497,0.000070495196,0.00011490395,0.20722197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962676,0.0019739466,0.00004359748,0.00037380948,0.00053182297,0.0008092413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941474,0.0018139054,0.00048087368,0.0007618587,0.000660214,0.0021357157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037935348,0.00026590988,0.00035452459,0.00041707655,0.0097005665,0.008364352,0.0006530639,0.003708553,0.027747158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009569554,0.00014733296,0.00029575403,0.0004203067,0.01702609,0.0072900504,0.004604438,0.007709296,0.0081965765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022877206,0.00007395198,0.001955821,0.000041364707,0.000008866713,0.00016820217,0.015155394,0.00014657807,0.00024475067,0.77666026,0.16434646,0.04117549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000977089,0.000038021117,0.0011425621,0.00013004182,0.000003883575,0.00015539778,0.0136578,0.00015713496,0.0001691542,0.18989377,0.7946289,0.0000135354785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030067891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005852066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027747158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00329584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003693283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092823505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198595948","doi":"10.1017/s0043887121000149","title":"The Generational and Institutional Sources of the Global Decline in Voter Turnout","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Democracy; Voter turnout; Voting; Political science; Globalization; Competition (biology); Inequality; Demographic economics; Political economy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.028510947355639433,"score_gpt":0.3349317694537217,"score_spread":0.3064208220980823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198595948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98718935,0.0011644962,0.00039203293,0.0019380645,0.000031996628,0.0000071398345,0.00041963582,0.000010740397,0.0088464655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994722,0.000121134886,0.000024020612,0.000046014684,0.000016957878,0.0000010954119,0.00008851353,0.000002100215,0.0002279775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999405,0.00025232107,0.000024790614,0.000109584085,0.00006543139,0.00014294026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971348,0.00077979977,0.00086040393,0.0004981857,0.0005146551,0.00021208801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018590284,0.00011395068,0.00023527374,0.0013874968,0.00040292018,0.0010824683,0.00027446644,0.0002714262,0.004195009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003238819,0.00009510579,0.00024565856,0.0012694498,0.0010986411,0.0005856091,0.0007946437,0.00049079704,0.00027398174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021669109,0.00003458527,0.95821065,0.000080084545,0.00010684616,0.00012944338,0.0021845133,0.00026528363,0.0010842761,0.0051466534,0.00087194983,0.03166905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003821537,0.000029380164,0.9941696,0.000023927445,0.000019214638,0.00006606031,0.0016723145,0.0001207887,0.0002550808,0.0010501563,0.0025845498,0.0000051044503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004090736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00703189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004195009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047036682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025607235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014033675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247705567","doi":"10.1017/s0043887116000162","title":"WPO volume 68 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies; University of Cambridge; Princeton University","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Mathematics; Environmental science; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.025502563490636183,"score_gpt":0.21804328370287512,"score_spread":0.19254072021223895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247705567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003161848,0.0012473566,0.00023073568,0.0035720533,0.014948407,0.000092337454,0.002686994,0.00048873725,0.9764172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070159073,0.00055907347,0.000060256745,0.00058999914,0.0014560746,0.000028919472,0.0007217654,0.00025857333,0.99562377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993374,0.00004883822,0.000024940888,0.00009328964,0.00041668845,0.000078889745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998664,0.00017353901,0.000069844675,0.0001979681,0.0005674416,0.00032721422],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005809762,0.0008192335,0.00091184926,0.0020188515,0.0017788148,0.007977007,0.000860125,0.0018800193,0.7983143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032854523,0.0003840478,0.00050852186,0.0024791935,0.00072440837,0.0032361445,0.0024307475,0.002855024,0.7543959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015315409,0.000016898604,0.000052366737,0.000086607906,0.0000015357203,0.00002022718,0.000014980988,0.000020849306,0.00014827942,0.0016202785,0.969455,0.028547602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023406883,0.0000046040345,0.0002635346,0.00007571339,6.314855e-7,0.000016453452,0.000020543119,0.000016854965,0.000052678424,0.0004222813,0.99912256,0.000001802878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027252743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004429711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20168573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015799182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015739624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2876802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297003606","doi":"10.1017/s0043887122000090","title":"Democratic Deliberation and the Resource Curse","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; International Growth Centre; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Deliberation; Subsidy; Democracy; Politics; Economics; Revenue; Resource curse; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Commons; Negotiation; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.014870543426151179,"score_gpt":0.18748102954105778,"score_spread":0.1726104861149066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297003606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66306657,0.0009046675,0.03637767,0.028711038,0.000535315,0.0009599579,0.00019120266,0.00018577723,0.26906794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99422014,0.000074196956,0.001991258,0.0008673932,0.000043853885,0.0002581219,0.000011681611,0.000018213499,0.0025151595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9121918,0.070972435,0.0017016007,0.0040648994,0.006357517,0.00471183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75088215,0.19942279,0.022611797,0.01800921,0.0051552197,0.0039188787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04938272,0.0006836053,0.0011257913,0.0012587754,0.0041835112,0.004381619,0.001033244,0.002310515,0.014062873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13955645,0.00040957547,0.00066019857,0.0013628288,0.010973206,0.0032046775,0.008296524,0.0038435548,0.0007450897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034697736,0.0020911447,0.03487291,0.0012684504,0.00059454446,0.000572686,0.03089856,0.012199214,0.004017855,0.78799444,0.012233425,0.10978702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018908789,0.0015321802,0.023899024,0.0004349461,0.00021428578,0.00015358631,0.01281827,0.011829383,0.00452563,0.860423,0.082153335,0.0001254822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014312378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00151607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04938272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00404319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005033923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2611639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412038318","doi":"10.1353/wp.2025.a964463","title":"Accountability in Time: Evolution and Expertise in Participatory Institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Politics","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University Research Committee, Emory University; Compute Canada; Arizona State University; Marquette University; National Science Foundation; Impact Fund; School of Politics and Global Studies, Arizona State University; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Accountability; Citizen journalism; Business; Political science; Economic system; Economics","score_opus":0.1115620171280399,"score_gpt":0.4686164168743879,"score_spread":0.357054399746348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412038318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93638134,0.0004527329,0.008506125,0.00804029,0.000035098994,0.00004503822,0.00016670558,0.000043858516,0.046328906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999114,0.000034594268,0.00025080715,0.000053211774,0.000014561543,0.000009369372,0.000014898788,0.0000037707632,0.00050479994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926987,0.0040451125,0.0002863254,0.0010701899,0.00090045866,0.0009991347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92723596,0.040092472,0.021183433,0.0032087287,0.0041621504,0.004117289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009114283,0.00012234387,0.00032056344,0.002661905,0.0023147673,0.0047158888,0.0008327517,0.0018574399,0.00991755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058555845,0.00019997533,0.00026979434,0.002449326,0.0068619773,0.007931366,0.004438586,0.0012680074,0.0005027844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062186905,0.00067990134,0.4684962,0.0002553628,0.00016815038,0.001087939,0.085577324,0.010949852,0.002862419,0.31536755,0.004804559,0.109128825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013188705,0.00032442436,0.5984902,0.00031157362,0.00007317275,0.00042494482,0.05977645,0.020760227,0.0015938662,0.27609587,0.041886568,0.00013089928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069543715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063235653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00991755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004329627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021889305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0482015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}