{"meta":{"query_hash":"74b2314281ca","filters":{"venue":"World Trade Organization Focus"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/74b2314281ca","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=World+Trade+Organization+Focus"},"results":[{"id":"W2352856232","doi":"","title":"On the Competition Issue of Canadian Trade Remedy System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Organization Focus","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Dumping; International trade; Public interest; Safeguard; Economics; Tribunal; Trade barrier; China; International economics; Domestic market; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03754365557777922,"score_gpt":0.21365943012888408,"score_spread":0.17611577455110486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2352856232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070550772,0.000043444226,0.00019225379,0.038074836,0.0006149719,0.0006352441,0.000015937967,0.00018592694,0.9531823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997523,0.000010025265,0.00007499573,0.00051381276,0.000104796105,0.000003475913,0.0000061355827,0.000025251245,0.0017384723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988741,0.00025222852,0.0002098711,0.00014839382,0.00028686278,0.00022852432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943787,0.00010058786,0.00008399327,0.00018773813,0.00006531056,0.00012450066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031861852,0.000092623435,0.00011571698,0.0003004919,0.00053338817,0.000032159147,0.00030106958,0.000065019565,0.005107271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027334786,0.00007017546,0.000027353422,0.002241296,0.00018734163,0.00008655618,0.000008095202,0.00011981672,0.0003101295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004637594,0.000027334245,0.00014974856,0.000007945514,0.000011634615,0.000002435507,0.022178687,0.0000028789484,0.00018795514,0.9626026,0.014628006,0.00019613543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005639442,0.00021010914,0.008686784,0.00029506697,0.00010413162,0.000009237448,0.0201142,0.00012457014,0.11969175,0.0039045068,0.84560597,0.00068971503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1178547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44637796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99046797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002507356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021174015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361010217","doi":"","title":"Case Review-Japan v.Canada on the Renewable Energy Industry Measures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Organization Focus","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable energy; Legislation; Low-carbon economy; International trade; Business; Climate change; Turning point; Energy law; Environmental law; International economics; Economics; Natural resource economics; China; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03673236794896564,"score_gpt":0.22655297089244372,"score_spread":0.18982060294347808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361010217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039175046,0.0030643013,0.00065033685,0.33568406,0.0021914965,0.0015105202,0.000051417992,0.0011315687,0.6517988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799642,0.0002599361,0.00006558934,0.007748026,0.00028305134,0.000012923809,0.000013169883,0.00007318066,0.011579937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975797,0.00048470424,0.00040187914,0.00036517778,0.00075349974,0.00041507478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866843,0.00016163604,0.00021916756,0.0004961588,0.00020191172,0.0002527052],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004655258,0.00023287903,0.00022586009,0.00011646648,0.0012469211,0.00008586179,0.00052956195,0.00014026432,0.009485082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007763088,0.0001934715,0.0000388895,0.0041175564,0.00020884023,0.00021329778,0.000041577583,0.0003463158,0.000049225462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004598114,0.00012492703,0.0055112983,0.00002470754,0.000051224022,0.00022206572,0.0024015128,0.000029889383,0.00005051646,0.6236458,0.36671424,0.0012192456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002532624,0.00002157642,0.0017685927,0.00016443858,0.000110075765,0.000120716024,0.0010445021,0.0000029566797,0.014743117,0.0010377133,0.9802284,0.0005046184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3953584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89003587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003342144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091120513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2375398091","doi":"","title":"Multiple Obligations of State Trading Enterprises under the Multilateral Trade System ——an Illustration of Canada's Transnational Legal Practices","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Organization Focus","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Subsidy; Negotiation; International trade; China; Business; Competition (biology); Order (exchange); State (computer science); Market access; Multilateral trade negotiations; World trade; Economics; International economics; Agriculture; Market economy; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03842378715437592,"score_gpt":0.21026566033201977,"score_spread":0.17184187317764385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2375398091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821383,0.0002841271,0.005966914,0.00775102,0.00066924375,0.00038588102,0.00066201383,0.000048472466,0.0020940383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991894,0.000009089615,0.00042448443,0.00008008896,0.000086100306,0.0000066283546,0.00009523355,0.000029676316,0.00007933348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998569,0.000039999657,0.0008382686,0.0002067024,0.00008716572,0.00025888067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985573,0.00011618085,0.0009875962,0.00020190411,0.00003278641,0.00010421073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030404495,0.00015244419,0.00027725112,0.00016048283,0.00016996819,0.000057201687,0.0002175177,0.00005245275,0.00010220378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005080307,0.00015401148,0.000056537814,0.00052457646,0.0000564557,0.0009550111,0.000009589785,0.00011545578,0.00000266564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022805802,0.0002632659,0.19242282,0.00007632049,0.0001425346,5.453231e-7,0.002178453,0.007731341,0.00092160935,0.79579973,0.00032514727,0.00011542573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012986321,0.000055776563,0.9487809,0.000029072318,0.0000654015,0.0000256439,0.0020341163,0.018135753,0.020037616,0.0018061408,0.007271923,0.00045905114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010637119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054477967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7939936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023402499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011940377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2378698941","doi":"","title":"The Determination of Subsidy Provider in CVD Investigation:An International Comparison","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Organization Focus","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Equity (law); Business; Diversification (marketing strategy); Government (linguistics); Precondition; Public economics; International trade; Economics; Market economy; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.03785604892889341,"score_gpt":0.28591635989327596,"score_spread":0.24806031096438255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2378698941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6684348,0.0004942098,0.011258506,0.12929644,0.0066192048,0.0048240297,0.00004809662,0.0016123572,0.17741239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971696,0.000024819747,0.0017376547,0.00010186603,0.00014227237,0.000010302688,0.00003582417,0.000037831272,0.00073981733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980377,0.00033148503,0.0005926007,0.00026417067,0.0005362088,0.00023784641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888796,0.0001325567,0.00034029112,0.00025818485,0.0002665299,0.0001144779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005495626,0.0001348385,0.00015728221,0.0002903505,0.00042895137,0.00011649453,0.00060486706,0.00008112604,0.0007021183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005349643,0.00012710388,0.000025299316,0.0026277327,0.0004099709,0.0009303302,0.000036793415,0.00015525176,0.00003174099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011642781,0.00016796478,0.43002078,0.000006319591,0.000009925071,0.0000017823121,0.03091805,0.000012309518,0.0005829447,0.5333564,0.0002063957,0.004705475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010577473,0.000060067672,0.8873302,0.00004599518,0.000045329136,0.000002959787,0.0048350245,0.00050646183,0.0639005,0.008670882,0.0330761,0.0004687874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006525191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023196224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5246855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018589263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022259212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}