{"meta":{"query_hash":"a2d656b69581","filters":{"venue":"World Trade Review"},"cohort_total":86,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":86,"exported":86,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a2d656b69581","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=World+Trade+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1544206638","doi":"","title":"Canada Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Business; Milk products; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Commerce; Food science; Economics; Environmental science; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02052028786518846,"score_gpt":0.21216359978885885,"score_spread":0.1916433119236704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544206638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88767844,0.061209764,8.938167e-8,0.05022504,0.000041668227,0.00050308637,0.000010994786,0.0000038609396,0.0003270736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98646957,0.012809454,0.000009693256,0.00060782494,0.000061131235,0.000009314268,0.000010945336,3.041157e-7,0.00002175324],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948776,0.000049233993,0.00023654923,0.00008087444,0.00007809668,0.000067480614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995739,0.00012042962,0.00023288008,0.00003433894,0.000021602053,0.000016844424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003230314,0.000057467078,0.00016261514,0.000002159315,0.000069386944,0.0000058062815,0.00008416597,0.000008452263,0.0000074527375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005938022,0.000013100179,0.000040400653,0.00020477451,0.00004749498,0.00003316577,0.0000071215054,0.000044683165,1.6543626e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006150423,0.000109829154,0.008330831,0.0034262817,0.00019169082,0.000002477884,0.0017999054,0.00012074268,0.043157484,0.088029295,0.014379197,0.84039074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041018365,0.00006103944,0.86641437,0.0014567599,0.00015314957,0.000014528591,0.0003837963,0.00000288334,0.0076305405,0.0011945693,0.12207389,0.00020429869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1297364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5179299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85808355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012038815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031368967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87605876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564572718","doi":"10.1017/s147474560300140x","title":"International regime conflict in trade and environment: the Biosafety Protocol and the WTO","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Biosafety; Precautionary principle; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); International trade; Obligation; Agriculture; Business; Sustainable development; Political science; Biotechnology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.023498508059637536,"score_gpt":0.2996886472987039,"score_spread":0.2761901392390664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564572718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025058398,0.025196668,0.000010420908,0.8252946,0.000087923785,0.04752576,0.0000048529982,0.000041585627,0.1018131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60035914,0.33378825,0.0004678637,0.022941092,0.00038131207,0.035751414,0.000008798212,0.000080421756,0.0062216967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998202,0.00078102195,0.00031629734,0.00022209699,0.00029254716,0.00018598989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993269,0.00028607072,0.000121699806,0.0001945057,0.0000037403236,0.00006708175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014104114,0.00012667432,0.00022673048,0.000038763323,0.00027874953,0.000075724056,0.00025909205,0.000029049017,0.0006367503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016186661,0.00007208517,0.000046603454,0.0004062871,0.00079205405,0.00012708409,0.000025883572,0.00019200938,0.0000105971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065602217,0.000031208147,0.00075195346,0.00011370132,0.000016829339,0.0000018882259,0.0013798636,4.997187e-7,0.0000038234016,0.98970747,0.0016051916,0.006380991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073864753,0.000003597313,0.006103488,0.00030661607,0.000024555327,0.0000070003252,0.000075596734,0.0000031601355,0.000011192085,0.0005926364,0.9920425,0.00009103142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003079746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020584093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99043727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050923005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033606528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69719696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893122135","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605002454","title":"United States-Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Subsidy; Dumping; International trade; Legislation; Business; Consistency (knowledge bases); International economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.022037399131158132,"score_gpt":0.30141338390994465,"score_spread":0.2793759847787865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893122135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04901613,0.39379624,0.000046578898,0.49437448,0.00036901917,0.0029095702,0.000083969084,0.0005517454,0.05885226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82799876,0.16521549,0.00056307757,0.0035488158,0.00015764804,0.000009097977,0.00005428178,0.000026898866,0.0024259253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984846,0.00029227685,0.00044307942,0.00020977246,0.0003005529,0.00026968896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925214,0.0001551155,0.00020398443,0.00019838,0.000047920832,0.00014246332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006789868,0.00013516411,0.00037761984,0.00015971737,0.00017400114,0.000035365487,0.00020529039,0.000034742814,0.0011182469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013393318,0.00013002494,0.000066610504,0.0019561714,0.00021591056,0.00022632962,0.000019990548,0.00013566439,0.00004159523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003463307,0.00069056515,0.043330427,0.006786702,0.00035428896,0.00002755725,0.022486849,0.00006421937,0.00043823625,0.45357993,0.13142428,0.3407823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019207949,0.000006112698,0.0075129075,0.0012188783,0.000069538284,0.0000015557292,0.00005279157,0.0000125852475,0.00012604929,0.000044847915,0.9906205,0.00014214663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002580998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027369703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85919625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007667588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011711862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915722993","doi":"10.1017/s1474745603001393","title":"Regulatory transparency, developing countries and the WTO","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Developing country; Globalization; Business; Corporate governance; Democracy; Independence (probability theory); International trade; Adaptation (eye); International economics; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Law; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.022041795250402303,"score_gpt":0.285603240487127,"score_spread":0.2635614452367247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915722993","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021078973,0.47726965,0.00014397939,0.42615435,0.0003071213,0.0011404385,0.0000027890185,0.00015400173,0.09461689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49666992,0.4825132,0.0006263994,0.017244283,0.0000972075,0.000045609235,0.0000023724062,0.000026451975,0.002774583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982805,0.00062182534,0.00031895013,0.00020096578,0.00033182395,0.00024591704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933153,0.0002607632,0.00009439944,0.00020343137,0.000025865435,0.00008398915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013584949,0.00012993463,0.00031384162,0.000038361402,0.00061706366,0.00006987821,0.00019914033,0.000029259601,0.0005714903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001672762,0.00008988034,0.000062555446,0.0008085436,0.0007243975,0.00015628948,0.0000072057355,0.000113434726,0.000028442018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010629363,0.000004000666,0.0005533234,0.0003037262,0.000012028043,0.0000010260563,0.0009599094,1.2833397e-7,3.150353e-7,0.9936503,0.0035160622,0.0009980714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002509816,0.0000013202845,0.0019210593,0.00088640716,0.000068879424,0.0000035819335,0.00005784367,1.5447453e-7,0.000024299838,0.0016682264,0.994986,0.00013126295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025956482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013341961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006304504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020245521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62574184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974077603","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605002624","title":"Multilateralism compromised: the mysterious origins of GATT Article XXIV","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Charter; Treaty; Political science; International trade; Free trade; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.016886277371353377,"score_gpt":0.292756967364547,"score_spread":0.2758706899931936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974077603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07013845,0.17262304,0.00012284712,0.640681,0.0015024095,0.0060014497,0.000056328612,0.00081823074,0.1080562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913602,0.004671572,0.00028725463,0.0017743945,0.0002002939,0.000021417412,0.0000058731057,0.000021331365,0.0016576885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983195,0.000321452,0.000490364,0.00019731132,0.00037768186,0.00029368684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921817,0.00013240823,0.0002024506,0.00033066777,0.000041312152,0.000074998505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005184481,0.00013335886,0.00032755415,0.000043321583,0.000296137,0.000051952833,0.00038839542,0.000029772373,0.0007660674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041680953,0.00009677703,0.00012272746,0.0011222481,0.0003464864,0.00013489228,0.00002413776,0.00012601864,0.000112819806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003981454,0.00018310937,0.004056666,0.00077479216,0.000030529285,0.000009246122,0.0012371384,0.00001632483,0.0011077992,0.97180367,0.015545903,0.0052308673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021287723,0.000005096089,0.013199614,0.0006412712,0.00006695395,0.000002429106,0.000024594701,0.000009848359,0.0005774457,0.00029131028,0.98484105,0.00012751513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012597819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003002927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011760027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008274334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8387901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984749704","doi":"10.1017/s1474745601001033","title":"Cross-agreement complaints before the Appellate Body: a case study of the <i>EC–Asbestos</i> dispute","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Political science; Agreement; Asbestos; International trade; Law; International trade law; World trade; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038978772079361144,"score_gpt":0.32120652207980926,"score_spread":0.28222775000044814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984749704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27013564,0.17253248,0.000026157511,0.43255675,0.0028294616,0.021759208,0.00009712021,0.00047851395,0.09958465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884106,0.0049021323,0.00001767803,0.0020404402,0.0001463846,0.000041951476,0.0000015082202,0.000026345931,0.0044129635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704766,0.00074769516,0.00068380265,0.00033207997,0.00080183445,0.00038694195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985054,0.00012165384,0.00037359633,0.0008119566,0.00005976563,0.00012763076],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095689617,0.00022247051,0.00042737235,0.00004266032,0.0012065015,0.00009698498,0.00086530944,0.000032659562,0.0019916215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008570995,0.00012997858,0.00019436996,0.0020843383,0.00056373153,0.00013727488,0.00012522376,0.0002816481,0.00010996216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014014164,0.0076569,0.32154045,0.0049363626,0.0011762487,0.001689113,0.14561851,0.00013471821,0.000025335525,0.26463327,0.10874852,0.14382656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044143014,0.00004530959,0.012763334,0.001081476,0.00029225493,0.00012444663,0.0009705939,0.000022294134,0.000007456868,0.000052839696,0.9840058,0.00019274393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008062447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025761234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009259278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037149075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993517717","doi":"10.1017/s1474745604001600","title":"Changing the terms of trade policy making: from the ‘club’ to the ‘multistakeholder’ model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Club; Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Openness to experience; Commercial policy; Economics; Ambiguity; Political science; International trade; International economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06120985283662886,"score_gpt":0.33958019018263247,"score_spread":0.2783703373460036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993517717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015462603,0.022664359,0.0008372405,0.96083766,0.00018466922,0.0017278702,0.000053112493,0.000096631426,0.013443819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95133996,0.008040462,0.0005317161,0.038699847,0.0007020056,0.000063166575,0.000006525075,0.000040397324,0.0005759026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977158,0.00036977153,0.00048411303,0.0002950527,0.0006420305,0.00049323955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985993,0.00032904057,0.00023421233,0.00071720674,0.00001790637,0.000102361664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010694081,0.00021210368,0.00034843225,0.00008128007,0.0009836117,0.00010585304,0.0013950602,0.000040096267,0.0001214607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032343337,0.000108354565,0.00020352755,0.0031932476,0.00036127746,0.00013274787,0.00008381377,0.00028494152,0.000045222605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029260907,0.00006751998,0.000114616836,0.00014683086,0.00005777149,0.0000026743162,0.0301105,0.0013395346,0.000037045644,0.936039,0.007891116,0.024190493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018515403,0.0000063688144,0.0018673248,0.0019294566,0.0001325454,0.0000021258231,0.0006582918,0.00005128475,0.000072547205,0.0033275613,0.99156654,0.0002008287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038125057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046458263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016210614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002421999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7565245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001342683","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000500","title":"Boomerangs over Lac Léman: Transnational Lobbying and Foreign Venue Shopping in WTO Dispute Settlement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Settlement (finance); International trade; Business; World trade; Government (linguistics); China; Foreign direct investment; International economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Payment; Finance","score_opus":0.04105414892897555,"score_gpt":0.26850761295329556,"score_spread":0.22745346402432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001342683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024504064,0.09708267,0.00057698257,0.2720017,0.0012564351,0.0035347962,0.00006435936,0.00026639632,0.6007126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8893343,0.0016039147,0.0003016013,0.10733701,0.0006114207,0.00011282942,0.00023364727,0.000030967516,0.0004342868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903536,0.000013890106,0.00031408115,0.00018830679,0.00029080582,0.00015756334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974805,0.000017912296,0.000102882484,0.000080382095,0.000028968087,0.000021794871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038828515,0.0001279288,0.00019010676,0.00016268062,0.000051377072,0.00009600201,0.00010093968,0.000017186107,0.00028268475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020132493,0.00011891746,0.000057534595,0.00031091596,0.000026759464,0.000693822,0.00002665188,0.00010055563,0.000034397963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062833637,0.00003953056,0.004069526,0.00077832537,0.00001525506,0.0000075968255,0.00002213362,0.000011410988,0.000014921198,0.98158294,0.01181869,0.0016333732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005964172,0.0000039693286,0.010112678,0.0009974026,0.000036268866,0.0000023838136,0.000011235052,0.0013797533,0.0000039507977,0.005341113,0.98135036,0.00016445824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020461639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019001059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047783225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001801272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48493132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007375031","doi":"10.1017/s1474745611000103","title":"Mutually agreed solutions under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: An Analytical Framework after the<i>Softwood Lumber</i>Arbitration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Arbitration; Enforcement; Settlement (finance); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; International trade law; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.13893545138941918,"score_gpt":0.3328775943024434,"score_spread":0.19394214291302422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007375031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005647498,0.045932975,0.04167952,0.7967622,0.0017206034,0.0050673764,0.000079606725,0.00073409046,0.10745886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974339,0.0075169755,0.00070151314,0.016099483,0.000438983,0.00010498828,0.000023029594,0.00004151421,0.0007345221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968731,0.0008802752,0.0005472639,0.00039661615,0.00072191225,0.00058083824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985341,0.00032321503,0.00018588446,0.00066851266,0.0000474908,0.0002408429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014146138,0.00025031107,0.00031496724,0.00006491948,0.0012638959,0.00018077121,0.0006618461,0.00008526272,0.0031092083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011805525,0.00015941181,0.00020540832,0.00174275,0.00072960753,0.00039531462,0.00006377657,0.00046239182,0.00011434527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000528521,0.00012220751,0.00060374953,0.00005984251,0.00006883537,0.0000032101839,0.0035711115,0.0000024311419,9.219756e-7,0.9911643,0.0040949136,0.0003031889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038118346,0.00008752582,0.05353717,0.0021162203,0.0014860857,0.000014917241,0.0039757295,0.0000856211,0.000009248584,0.08304082,0.854342,0.00092346815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012310484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120919375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97377425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031848132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001915421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031991483","doi":"10.1017/s1474745606002928","title":"Trade rules and climate change subsidies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Protectionism; Scope (computer science); Greenhouse gas; Limiting; Climate change; Economics; Public economics; International economics; International trade; Natural resource economics; Business; Market economy","score_opus":0.13204753289093593,"score_gpt":0.2685674010893236,"score_spread":0.13651986819838766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031991483","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011182403,0.908388,0.000004333635,0.03206428,0.00025055936,0.0005510004,0.0007165942,0.000088878514,0.046753928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17965092,0.8138382,0.00026807282,0.005243429,0.0005301128,0.00014234193,0.00008691794,0.000045049648,0.00019497678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998481,0.000013452614,0.0006872822,0.00037140225,0.000018934912,0.0004279274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999333,0.0000482319,0.00027539828,0.0002619324,0.0000019246597,0.00007949346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037447247,0.00021529902,0.00069819175,0.00016814581,0.000114443894,0.000058167978,0.00013791474,0.000049265927,0.00032871857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000132929445,0.0002377662,0.00015439895,0.00019027905,0.00006937283,0.00022968903,0.000045546905,0.00011932993,0.00044882591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004427888,0.00008096007,0.028110329,0.0040688617,0.000028113904,0.0000073684764,0.00020082231,3.0380133e-7,0.0000019621596,0.94773495,0.007912117,0.011849772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028040464,0.000016980272,0.09452919,0.0009650527,0.00003218951,0.000022666323,0.000010800786,0.00005878299,0.00000853021,0.014888856,0.88877094,0.00041560378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016311814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047068534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048428617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025426598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065220538","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000317","title":"Renewable Energy and Government Support: Time to ‘Green’ the SCM Agreement?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Renewable energy; Treaty; Greenhouse gas; Incentive; Feed-in tariff; Tariff; Government (linguistics); Energy subsidies; Fossil fuel; International trade; Economics; Business; Duty; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Energy policy; Market economy; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.010783783380882463,"score_gpt":0.24454990640410043,"score_spread":0.23376612302321798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065220538","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014831984,0.017856613,0.0001342646,0.52754015,0.0001518145,0.0007007701,0.000009902898,0.000100394034,0.45349124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21390338,0.04560327,0.0009613847,0.11480986,0.0011958408,0.00016438837,0.000022291408,0.00009480466,0.62324476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980706,0.00035867022,0.0003036493,0.00028229473,0.00065842184,0.0003263809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991307,0.00014989729,0.00011235234,0.00035762432,0.000018055889,0.00023134236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010361439,0.00014724486,0.00028157668,0.000026735257,0.00041138154,0.00008071261,0.00038368953,0.000025496543,0.006610168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012995284,0.00011056245,0.000062126324,0.00086154,0.00013892255,0.00011580876,0.00007446939,0.00006171411,0.00047581052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031079153,0.00006539732,0.00030381908,0.00030650976,0.000044271423,0.0000028524244,0.00065417186,0.0000065395793,0.00007043659,0.29108185,0.60852695,0.09893413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008487409,0.000019866782,0.00045682892,0.00036555403,0.000060837803,0.0000014162629,0.000016553817,0.000004491549,0.000049959937,0.0002684257,0.9985251,0.00014608198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070747425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00990893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4127303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010751938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052756313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078188506","doi":"10.1017/s1474745608003972","title":"The US–Canada softwood lumber dispute and the WTO definition of subsidy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"U.S. Department of Commerce","keywords":"Stumpage; Subsidy; Softwood; Business; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); International trade; Economics; Finance; Agricultural economics; Market economy; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry","score_opus":0.057031177800155985,"score_gpt":0.19254502932886708,"score_spread":0.1355138515287111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078188506","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06485414,0.8255746,0.000022302096,0.028743722,0.00047609967,0.0007300509,0.00015276343,0.000019603915,0.07942675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6051341,0.3920633,0.00006505385,0.0024114915,0.00004167432,0.000027501243,0.000006836613,0.0000109351995,0.00023909252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988672,0.000029477918,0.0006594908,0.0001988413,0.0000339461,0.0002110339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991101,0.00017963222,0.00032186887,0.00032598118,0.0000066843927,0.000055708468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004215228,0.00012939016,0.00049802853,0.000022470944,0.00020999616,0.000020156564,0.00021874515,0.0000226897,0.00006372176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055748453,0.0000875198,0.00014147733,0.00019259706,0.0001929032,0.00008242612,0.000030401512,0.00012678932,0.0000345478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012381312,0.000026812711,0.028260926,0.00041501393,0.00009050817,0.0000035226803,0.00004100614,0.0000034622374,1.2409694e-7,0.94949573,0.019764366,0.001886175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070242776,0.000009784333,0.06439078,0.00021607518,0.00003429591,0.0000412367,0.000006637181,0.000043633987,0.0000033798017,0.016247174,0.91813546,0.000169133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009360771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05941322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004632637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034010412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99723595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079600291","doi":"10.1017/s1474745613000232","title":"Sealing animal welfare into the GATT exceptions: the international dimension of animal welfare in WTO disputes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Argument (complex analysis); Welfare; CONTEST; Relevance (law); Law and economics; International law; Dimension (graph theory); Economics; Political science; International trade; Public economics; Law; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.02061315627317476,"score_gpt":0.29993099530657796,"score_spread":0.2793178390334032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079600291","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019012498,0.030393474,0.000004293722,0.943394,0.00025515584,0.0012403047,0.000006358309,0.00006913517,0.005624754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98348016,0.014106429,0.00023047854,0.0016303733,0.00018909217,0.000093121766,0.000016578382,0.000022272196,0.00023148545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977911,0.0004454145,0.00057853956,0.00027459423,0.0006326415,0.00027768427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904865,0.00021175787,0.00023787527,0.00032067738,0.000099882986,0.00008114598],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090136344,0.00016968309,0.0002926741,0.00009898723,0.00062908675,0.00010789382,0.0008218862,0.000044325625,0.003603491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002923957,0.00010628263,0.00013115414,0.0014907476,0.00037050797,0.0003813877,0.00011475718,0.00027697053,0.00007971391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009848635,0.0001513001,0.0091081895,0.00045516138,0.000054256154,0.000003762526,0.0065779625,0.00001319125,0.0005252513,0.9571064,0.00915686,0.01683782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015289163,0.000020450869,0.11681845,0.0012221502,0.000049741928,0.0000023793682,0.0017811,0.000040885767,0.000060703158,0.0002435802,0.87943727,0.00017039981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014311243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045551662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96446764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011581205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006445437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99730736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115457048","doi":"10.1017/s1474745613000220","title":"Law, politics, and the true cost of protectionism: the choice of trade remedies or binding overhang","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Protectionism; Flexibility (engineering); Government (linguistics); Politics; Economics; Law and economics; International economics; International trade; Public economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.09272934411199478,"score_gpt":0.2548911846639833,"score_spread":0.1621618405519885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115457048","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040408596,0.68555236,0.00010390157,0.16987745,0.0012397178,0.010478054,0.0005147094,0.00008366873,0.09174152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8856848,0.11035119,0.00019701524,0.002755085,0.00011911385,0.00022553671,0.000005009765,0.000023459346,0.000638796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860555,0.00004342158,0.00086311967,0.00021190396,0.00003624878,0.00023975864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877536,0.0002721627,0.00053673197,0.00035249238,0.000008608866,0.000054650263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061852654,0.00014924911,0.00069789286,0.0000630174,0.00014440787,0.000043085343,0.00026274088,0.000040963103,0.00022726385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014963534,0.000092551076,0.00017322811,0.00027747356,0.0003860203,0.00017266757,0.00003782888,0.00017299035,0.00003529736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089630685,0.00004493891,0.0018135887,0.0020304958,0.00013651206,3.1398812e-7,0.00022824973,0.000004127794,0.000009368567,0.9890459,0.003250795,0.0034267358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012586396,0.000057985137,0.015671475,0.0014998612,0.00010460032,0.000020282687,0.00012668307,0.00021290845,0.00023745584,0.018807461,0.9617165,0.00028618347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010905374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035018523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97023845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004129746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013861589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37741232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129285424","doi":"10.1017/s1474745610000303","title":"Transparency as a trade policy tool: the WTO's cloudy windows","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Subsidy; International trade; Corporate governance; Business; International economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Finance; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.01852309315563454,"score_gpt":0.3236709967197642,"score_spread":0.30514790356412963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129285424","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007616446,0.026570244,0.000011090243,0.80264175,0.0008332038,0.0020064183,0.000017787022,0.00035389204,0.16680397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316448,0.04158142,0.0001753102,0.021092517,0.0016363282,0.00010830587,0.0000134136735,0.00006607316,0.0036818518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706495,0.0005150545,0.00064204546,0.00043146257,0.000702856,0.00064362516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848753,0.00029823388,0.00020234719,0.0007128641,0.000023620427,0.00027540475],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098722,0.0003030434,0.0005013264,0.00012279672,0.00086034945,0.0001557913,0.0011036587,0.000097839504,0.0037109868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047766868,0.00021968383,0.00029650016,0.0028976304,0.00056544435,0.0003010354,0.000025080357,0.00075266906,0.00032173845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028734119,0.00014422966,0.00046654991,0.0002849106,0.00003816069,0.000010960461,0.002432767,6.7724295e-7,0.000077983816,0.9405741,0.01966838,0.036298413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002430357,0.000012629671,0.0036322717,0.00040961467,0.00012851205,0.000013903172,0.00005873529,0.0000011781677,0.000057477737,0.0016168494,0.99354106,0.00028470636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004296817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010302189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008173425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005493531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139320157","doi":"10.1017/s1474745608003686","title":"Comment: United States – Final Dumping Determination on Softwood Lumber from Canada: Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada (Softwood V)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Content (measure theory); Agricultural economics; Pulp and paper industry; Waste management; Business; Environmental science; Advertising; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04484874389896933,"score_gpt":0.2704103580348495,"score_spread":0.22556161413588013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139320157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49175864,0.022179475,0.00003886477,0.4707763,0.0010702282,0.0029064752,0.00043948297,0.00009203169,0.010738489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544694,0.0045184204,0.00009063252,0.039386008,0.00006143157,0.000028833185,0.000032119515,0.00001883837,0.0013943542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979422,0.00046427618,0.00040255726,0.00021109618,0.0006371953,0.00034269135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889135,0.00046896818,0.00015469955,0.000258771,0.00007288852,0.00015329002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003544602,0.00014437373,0.00028901215,0.000030788622,0.0004750111,0.000015254541,0.00037747252,0.000026519589,0.00043122598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005136329,0.00010886908,0.0000600213,0.00088867,0.00011101389,0.00006500915,0.000032129217,0.0001952835,0.000007883609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016544454,0.000121854086,0.0013119106,0.00020855546,0.000048305497,0.000016773069,0.0028180336,0.00003507263,0.000045753604,0.00050187955,0.96170163,0.0331737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013328741,0.000021926833,0.0014445087,0.0013912282,0.000046399713,0.0000013900165,0.000176388,0.000056850884,0.001187471,0.000038078408,0.995327,0.00017546669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99881166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4627107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006443108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012243094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47216222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139322096","doi":"10.1017/s1474745604001740","title":"<i>Canada – Dairy</i> Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Subsidy; International trade; Business; World trade; Agreement on Agriculture; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Political science; Economics; Geography; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.034533272402374464,"score_gpt":0.20023018019427172,"score_spread":0.16569690779189725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139322096","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23705138,0.6981495,0.00003884217,0.054034464,0.00079659553,0.0019004241,0.00022641825,0.000013817175,0.0077885697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725122,0.025851477,0.00008143386,0.0014499071,0.000036112924,0.00001783747,0.000012223486,0.000009601077,0.00002923684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877805,0.000026567215,0.0007880923,0.00020083212,0.000060670274,0.00014579592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885035,0.000095773656,0.0007256073,0.00027487476,0.000020011086,0.000033361408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007796385,0.000115880095,0.00046848485,0.000027656584,0.00007480896,0.000010606458,0.00016634075,0.00001616014,0.000009717305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016179154,0.00008417993,0.000063437794,0.00029655895,0.000068910565,0.00008458398,0.000011851552,0.00009898504,7.313395e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008222636,0.00014986748,0.05875332,0.012447731,0.0006507786,0.000012162793,0.0015847889,0.0020315722,0.00007056076,0.85511935,0.045087878,0.02400976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033527226,0.00005984802,0.23261067,0.0026868335,0.00027960973,0.000035684552,0.000481205,0.00006998705,0.002058034,0.014446609,0.7431844,0.00073440676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8188847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96109676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84067273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010258808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037769706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3432758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146523027","doi":"10.1017/s1474745613000128","title":"Fragmentation in international trade law: insights from the global investment regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bilateralism; International trade; International economics; Treaty; Economics; International economic law; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; International trade law; Trade barrier; Free trade; Harmonization; International law; Politics; Political science; Multilateralism; Public international law; Law","score_opus":0.021380417586551154,"score_gpt":0.24975850647425182,"score_spread":0.22837808888770067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146523027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073747444,0.01714974,0.000021552734,0.2839772,0.0011215716,0.0016686528,0.00001172253,0.000116706244,0.6885581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5060334,0.0017042061,0.0001742142,0.4906794,0.00075320987,0.00020161054,0.00030622727,0.000013459612,0.00013425361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987416,0.0000335099,0.0004538533,0.000244076,0.00037982833,0.00014709057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995362,0.000041715182,0.00020462846,0.00018325722,0.000017654282,0.000016498983],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010918556,0.00017069628,0.00018650982,0.00005718654,0.00008458896,0.0002546869,0.00037057392,0.000026478538,0.0015672455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025288675,0.00011906545,0.00010085716,0.00040620076,0.000060154835,0.0012643118,0.00005238015,0.00013043264,0.0006831057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026950197,0.00007716919,0.000977021,0.000072194634,0.000029341012,0.0000025992042,0.000021851834,0.000004686934,0.000020714733,0.96348226,0.03422947,0.0010800264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003774868,0.0000027206124,0.034730706,0.00087166164,0.00003466988,9.113364e-7,0.000025538142,0.00060234795,0.000012452797,0.044878006,0.91831356,0.0001499216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019432773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015231662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001374717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014241722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154067369","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000130","title":"The Creation of the Multilateral Trade Court: Design and Experiential Learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Legalization; Experiential learning; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Settlement (finance); International trade; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04094902729198923,"score_gpt":0.31577908829154716,"score_spread":0.2748300609995579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154067369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058339136,0.33558866,0.0019609104,0.61893845,0.0022266065,0.0063341707,0.0000060924453,0.00038784908,0.028723378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980141,0.01711858,0.00050699146,0.00039597234,0.00011995729,0.00002384569,0.0000015816331,0.00001616903,0.0016759397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980684,0.00094737817,0.0002813743,0.0001386321,0.00038242122,0.0001817834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993227,0.00021655671,0.00017693985,0.0001581849,0.000028562252,0.00009702979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011578642,0.00009441726,0.00017856625,0.000022172157,0.0005685982,0.00006772848,0.0002476678,0.000027651418,0.0000610786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000360565,0.00005734692,0.000059348833,0.0006168637,0.00041115092,0.00013645319,0.000025125577,0.00014931714,0.00000520943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082807084,0.00033002716,0.018388363,0.0011737657,0.00022039091,0.000008236248,0.11048713,0.0005939756,0.0006479318,0.5525648,0.06508821,0.25041437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018677376,0.000011346832,0.003169389,0.00044776042,0.00005847595,0.00000210816,0.00038828028,0.00006405903,0.00020550481,0.00015156793,0.9952282,0.00008654484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046502537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018747104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97430706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004771204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012030865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4373255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159189050","doi":"10.1017/s1474745609990280","title":"Continued suspense: <i>EC–Hormones</i> and WTO disciplines on discrimination and domestic regulation Appellate Body Reports: <i>Canada/United States – Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC – Hormones Dispute</i>, WT/DS320/AB/R,WT/DS321/AB/R, adopted 14 November 2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; De facto; Scientific evidence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.009172046209259752,"score_gpt":0.26870307862923687,"score_spread":0.2595310324199771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159189050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7596836,0.027352741,0.00008258757,0.19987357,0.0011724437,0.006859376,0.00014998017,0.00025465124,0.0045710686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778498,0.019413155,0.00018927135,0.0010732932,0.00012764684,0.000054379176,0.00055933354,0.00005107786,0.0006820362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598336,0.0006158927,0.0013136006,0.0006422154,0.00095599244,0.00048891426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695355,0.0009933194,0.0009375507,0.0006122402,0.0002863662,0.0002169503],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017212555,0.0004218447,0.00078538654,0.0003273875,0.00059391477,0.00018522554,0.00030412374,0.00013205821,0.000098615375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095946057,0.00033119033,0.00009317536,0.0028863433,0.00067249907,0.00047545496,0.00007217292,0.00048145326,0.0000032109017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047711172,0.002647628,0.16846825,0.00721377,0.0005191224,0.00061495265,0.023082405,0.00035747202,0.035051037,0.53243816,0.19323385,0.03589626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015015879,0.00008415474,0.5952938,0.00331424,0.00056768267,0.00009486434,0.00091236044,0.00033134193,0.0006676851,0.0022175913,0.39407986,0.0009348135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011903438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36621714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53022057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000897672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023116334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166768069","doi":"10.1017/s1474745611000334","title":"Polly wants a Doha deal: what does the trade community think?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Latin Americans; Negotiation; Political science; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.16949071016423495,"score_gpt":0.24957609496174923,"score_spread":0.08008538479751429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166768069","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016615368,0.8182018,0.000034121535,0.04025095,0.0015320487,0.0014433635,0.00022558133,0.000197543,0.12149923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61464494,0.36694273,0.00047701126,0.01725811,0.000116697054,0.000053087828,0.000019573245,0.000048362304,0.00043947497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979032,0.00013889374,0.0010392116,0.00036002428,0.000044564367,0.000514053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981914,0.00011516856,0.00045453024,0.0010662157,0.0000053655754,0.00016730274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00142124,0.0003105154,0.0008570901,0.000106309366,0.0003674104,0.00015875242,0.0010433644,0.00008265435,0.0010152713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042594893,0.00022279556,0.00041046552,0.0004407242,0.00014549129,0.0006991131,0.00009035218,0.0006743441,0.0008640572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029480649,0.0007530664,0.01312137,0.002727227,0.00048076562,0.000021115864,0.0066103684,0.0000021483595,0.0000022778322,0.86307037,0.03152638,0.08165542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034510368,0.000044768283,0.040302694,0.0011816361,0.000066508306,0.00002810438,0.00037264515,0.00001860829,0.00002292463,0.04631599,0.9108434,0.00045765517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004155373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008434496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.879317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098731856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022578293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197767697","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000282","title":"Too much Zeal on Seals? Animal Welfare, Public Morals, and Consumer Ethics at the Bar of the WTO","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Public policy; Law and economics; Welfare; Product (mathematics); Political science; Public economics; Law; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.12611441625777353,"score_gpt":0.3548256356347773,"score_spread":0.22871121937700378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197767697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004369166,0.07304716,3.9527575e-7,0.8961409,0.00023301631,0.00081900926,0.000017175978,0.0000514211,0.025321798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630963,0.025871454,0.000031968277,0.007887895,0.000095987954,0.000017291744,0.000004532394,0.000023068644,0.0029714766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968966,0.0013160375,0.00038073855,0.00025923774,0.0008407287,0.00030661383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860597,0.00039523307,0.0002246802,0.00044976693,0.00011002861,0.00021432035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022165678,0.0001679698,0.00034738152,0.00004024389,0.00071417796,0.00008134695,0.00053412246,0.00008035579,0.0006360082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010829553,0.00009632295,0.0001029752,0.0011837807,0.00097393885,0.00016151642,0.00011913085,0.00045249955,0.00005593005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053412446,0.00005725108,0.0063853585,0.00033976938,0.000033895325,0.0000016469132,0.001484409,4.6729087e-7,0.000010006211,0.9100358,0.0791939,0.0024521798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015865352,0.000015842948,0.0123120565,0.00037213534,0.00007412493,0.0000036581848,0.00017963327,8.4577636e-7,0.000048339567,0.00018250596,0.9865341,0.00011807375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017061712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033815154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9587272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011956949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027441245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69638443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214531623","doi":"10.1017/s1474745606001406","title":"United States – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (WT/DS217/AB/R: DSR 2003:I,375)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Appeal; Dumping; Legislation; International trade; Political science; State (computer science); Business; Law; International economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01626606479665345,"score_gpt":0.2795627833131271,"score_spread":0.2632967185164737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214531623","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052054532,0.6631336,0.00009799206,0.1881939,0.0010480748,0.0056069316,0.00032985717,0.00096939364,0.08856572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8274447,0.16151743,0.0006092903,0.0023939763,0.00025947578,0.000025314897,0.00032152593,0.000064317486,0.00736401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758893,0.0004723286,0.00070657575,0.00033591356,0.00046095162,0.00043531577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988278,0.00021012059,0.00036281772,0.0002839316,0.00015482416,0.0001604835],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008125325,0.00023272475,0.00061422243,0.00023249046,0.0002872768,0.00007351253,0.00028853733,0.00006454194,0.0010732872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021830582,0.00022495037,0.00008600983,0.0041886466,0.00040677495,0.00025725117,0.0000300433,0.00019240534,0.000042470496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034008106,0.000687571,0.0862513,0.006042933,0.00025468203,0.000056334222,0.0038184477,0.00004341377,0.00050675194,0.5132631,0.3646817,0.024359742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032993493,0.000011485315,0.020750238,0.0016534247,0.00012539439,0.000002762141,0.000072373456,0.000011353743,0.00020000032,0.00017712629,0.9764132,0.00025270705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018162311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047586784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77539015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009496261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021974187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216720036","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605001217","title":"United States – Section 129(c)(1) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (WTO Doc. WT/DS22/R of 15 July 2002): Beating Around (The) Bush","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Duty; Section (typography); Commission; Legislation; Business; Political science; International economics; Law; Economics; Advertising","score_opus":0.02378641596569264,"score_gpt":0.30153172373259945,"score_spread":0.2777453077669068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216720036","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08695313,0.32534257,0.00046210544,0.45702466,0.0038021521,0.012678431,0.00021933364,0.0006944361,0.11282319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95166415,0.034131236,0.0004726865,0.003109909,0.00063370855,0.000031270214,0.00004155888,0.000050261235,0.009865191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692786,0.00076543784,0.00085705734,0.00027480294,0.0008057452,0.00036907502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981887,0.0003361216,0.00074658875,0.00049286924,0.0001392422,0.00009652147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012614515,0.00022048409,0.00045474194,0.00013349058,0.0005496462,0.0000658121,0.0006809541,0.000055426815,0.00085107493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026080816,0.0001517767,0.00020175194,0.003958843,0.00041080682,0.00036214193,0.000059706435,0.0002860095,0.000043440406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009428005,0.0032393811,0.075024985,0.014443258,0.0022000778,0.000011516461,0.058456913,0.006345345,0.0023081535,0.22182992,0.3258348,0.29021135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022193069,0.0000148338,0.0066742073,0.0018210578,0.00019982547,0.000001942093,0.00027904485,0.000033165423,0.0002936065,0.00010108822,0.99019146,0.00016784527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067191443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004581508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86471105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021300439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001572922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93186736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253429046","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605001254","title":"Canada – Export Credits and Loan Guarantees for Regional Aircraft (WT/DS222/R) A Comment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loan; Subsidy; Corporation; Business; Finance; Jurisprudence; Export credit agency; International trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.03428064084412347,"score_gpt":0.31151202796288724,"score_spread":0.2772313871187638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253429046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006164799,0.07734388,0.00010713749,0.90105885,0.00035587227,0.0011013296,0.000059249633,0.000038685546,0.019318523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.732796,0.12858231,0.0020962541,0.11890916,0.0029089705,0.00031182924,0.0001559392,0.000029527282,0.014209967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909276,0.000051251107,0.00022388829,0.00014054099,0.0003231687,0.00016837398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999615,0.00011673619,0.000087741406,0.00006719964,0.000038506605,0.00007479393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036978413,0.00007924794,0.00016482755,0.000022473185,0.00022520192,0.00002186166,0.00011701577,0.00001729752,0.00014324977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004435247,0.000071620416,0.000058090107,0.00009764653,0.000046643625,0.00010907116,0.000007960883,0.00005470699,0.0000034864954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040156233,0.00003166807,0.0002595434,0.000254257,0.000019362162,0.0000018327551,0.00016894736,8.8196975e-7,0.0000023189457,0.37229514,0.59162664,0.035335407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012178288,0.0000073773426,0.001373737,0.00068727636,0.000024201388,0.0000019814956,0.000022481308,0.000012341224,0.000007832073,0.00033293036,0.99731964,0.000088447894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083310045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80715454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7821497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001697768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003508422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9227943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264664405","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000415","title":"<i>US – COOL (Article 21.5 – Canada and Mexico)</i>, DS384/DS386","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Compliance (psychology); Political science; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Database","score_opus":0.024948480358736702,"score_gpt":0.2773930130732434,"score_spread":0.2524445327145067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264664405","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009664231,0.3461689,0.000030964668,0.49579942,0.0015031125,0.0023214791,0.000039958777,0.00049297616,0.14397895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624462,0.018240355,0.00031899937,0.015338797,0.00022385197,0.000024102443,0.00000820953,0.000033039396,0.003366446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980731,0.00030271182,0.0003457843,0.00028136568,0.00059544947,0.00040159104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888086,0.00011038555,0.00011420097,0.00025815525,0.00006581488,0.0005705798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007035786,0.00015995027,0.00034511462,0.000039732477,0.0002608244,0.00007131592,0.0002631204,0.00003321921,0.00047668282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031589487,0.00015292318,0.000041238345,0.0012765329,0.00020139222,0.00022244491,0.00003721772,0.00015497683,0.000064379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011363997,0.00012934273,0.03966166,0.0007840119,0.00007840877,0.00008747235,0.0021880458,0.000011097097,0.000029024053,0.29521042,0.64378846,0.018020725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000219967,0.000007293771,0.0052588405,0.00038639575,0.00006158776,0.0000060457896,0.00009057166,0.000004344919,0.000061165396,0.00016842756,0.9935364,0.00019894949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22617774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.902373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.952782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024265502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010208711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7789752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266883631","doi":"10.1017/s1474745603001125","title":"US – Export Restraints: United States – Measures Treating Export Restraints as Subsidies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Plaintiff; International trade; Duty; Legislation; Principal (computer security); Consistency (knowledge bases); Business; World trade; International trade law; Political science; Law; International economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04373032196484535,"score_gpt":0.3213137175900134,"score_spread":0.2775833956251681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266883631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030297251,0.20297001,0.00008801205,0.11997328,0.0014611245,0.0051423158,0.00007946765,0.0020952476,0.63789326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8159208,0.1656344,0.0012228293,0.0057908315,0.00026342936,0.00011556516,0.00016828378,0.00012582119,0.010757996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952555,0.0011875577,0.0010023623,0.0006347598,0.0010935211,0.00082635717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980537,0.00033656348,0.00042598078,0.000575533,0.0001651852,0.00044299435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022966226,0.0004205874,0.0007208614,0.00032367997,0.00082428503,0.00016029907,0.00050694856,0.00010151149,0.0030123729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021432384,0.0004042716,0.0002176027,0.0037515375,0.00059609703,0.00040292833,0.000024817187,0.000373589,0.00022842847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017951956,0.00053283176,0.034940913,0.0020108689,0.00036883913,0.0004978811,0.011666222,0.000032343738,0.00013079247,0.87156576,0.05400912,0.024226476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002710221,0.000025335501,0.007262422,0.0021746384,0.00015468583,0.000026668306,0.0011226876,8.040811e-7,0.00021312883,0.0011390443,0.98713875,0.00047084357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054272084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025783428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024134348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053294835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267296807","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605001308","title":"United States – Preliminary Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada: What is a Subsidy?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stumpage; Softwood; Subsidy; Agricultural economics; Economics; Pulp and paper industry; Business; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.013011418876176243,"score_gpt":0.2428156819854117,"score_spread":0.22980426310923546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267296807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4482517,0.10872347,0.000066953544,0.4071302,0.00028008528,0.005347405,0.0001389341,0.00029963267,0.029761605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6941841,0.11468972,0.0055924896,0.1367999,0.00032036632,0.00037678875,0.00060515583,0.00014176029,0.0472897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987704,0.000071667084,0.00023618055,0.00030157954,0.00033536574,0.00028478523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938613,0.00006628775,0.000079144455,0.00031797762,0.000003694639,0.00014678798],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012986186,0.00017935048,0.00021035144,0.00006226282,0.000075544835,0.000055346067,0.00023851095,0.000016311922,0.0057153874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001009642,0.00014493158,0.000039208386,0.0008500148,0.000040519077,0.00035877453,0.00006982946,0.00009237231,0.0005276679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005054323,0.000091626636,0.008003735,0.00044074454,0.00004068307,0.000054252356,0.0008262976,0.00054271397,0.0000072959597,0.00008115937,0.6527038,0.33715713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001824834,0.000054089698,0.02671969,0.0013690024,0.000080280406,0.0000029799867,0.000013936044,0.0005009691,0.00004456741,0.000022358243,0.97078407,0.0002255534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19172484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67778975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4860649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002958785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025278112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99519354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274354561","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000452","title":"<i>Bilcon et al.</i> v. <i>Canada</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Free trade agreement; Law; Law and economics; Economics; International trade; Free trade","score_opus":0.038106125671534506,"score_gpt":0.2582316033095882,"score_spread":0.2201254776380537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274354561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044533594,0.016014956,0.0000148729505,0.242716,0.00046526254,0.00024781734,0.0000020410469,0.00006686556,0.7404277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020455813,0.0020387033,0.00008161684,0.975419,0.00026241533,0.000025894971,0.00006334149,0.000016019283,0.0016372062],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990328,0.000014032764,0.000268386,0.0001667844,0.0003722494,0.00014575392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996238,0.000015067071,0.0001328559,0.00014486667,0.000058592737,0.000024841846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035011163,0.00012587543,0.00018285075,0.000051570853,0.000040166764,0.00008527181,0.00017618283,0.000008073785,0.00048069132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052492083,0.00010518159,0.00006327312,0.00033584636,0.000018081157,0.0005723728,0.000034740937,0.000104197454,0.000396588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012891009,0.000015898817,0.000090578316,0.0001441774,0.0000059172153,0.000003733592,7.6603493e-7,0.0000012248885,0.0000047738854,0.3338592,0.6654725,0.0003999297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001939728,0.0000019722845,0.00013750384,0.00054462027,0.000021738075,0.0000024133478,0.0000024066655,0.00007941976,0.000013052854,0.00094114785,0.99792796,0.00013378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010371214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059188087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73879045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051690186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011830111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278081846","doi":"10.1017/s147474560600142x","title":"United States – Final Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada (AB-2003-6, WT/DS257/AB/R)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Duty; Political science; Pulp and paper industry; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.017590678911151063,"score_gpt":0.2674382720828339,"score_spread":0.2498475931716828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278081846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06933288,0.09003635,0.0011006622,0.7428989,0.0018857124,0.010125862,0.0009163661,0.0016262144,0.08207707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468095,0.010491795,0.0060916836,0.017781997,0.000876684,0.00015188091,0.0011512329,0.00015843865,0.016486842],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715555,0.00044601006,0.0005499236,0.00046871096,0.0008479267,0.00053189415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872714,0.000253464,0.0002255902,0.00034589652,0.00018488226,0.00026304723],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004173338,0.00027700476,0.00044258495,0.00017219658,0.00043885113,0.00012779274,0.00040125343,0.000047645168,0.0012946348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023711256,0.000255751,0.000051264833,0.005189745,0.00012821464,0.00021769821,0.000026291678,0.00021132606,0.000057429665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059380018,0.00041944944,0.032103024,0.0011185228,0.00015265991,0.00036236653,0.0019916,0.0004832778,0.000056136414,0.10249972,0.82701105,0.03374282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026764648,0.00001944496,0.022262752,0.0011833401,0.0001109153,0.0000030237843,0.00006613097,0.000018343844,0.00007465313,0.0001422491,0.9754877,0.00036376406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62920564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9694352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8774766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057995116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009932114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301036686","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000464","title":"Nature and Enforceability of WTO-plus SPS and TBT Provisions in Canada's PTAs: From<i>NAFTA</i>to<i>CETA</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technical barriers to trade; International trade; Enforcement; Phytosanitary certification; Customs union; Business; Harmonization; International economics; Conformity assessment; European union; Trade barrier; Free trade; World trade; International trade law; Economics; Political science; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01904689184486959,"score_gpt":0.290531257176712,"score_spread":0.27148436533184245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301036686","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09211345,0.5797869,0.000019400457,0.2814436,0.00092439016,0.0058491626,0.00026283818,0.00015438111,0.0394459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821174,0.013733125,0.0005226145,0.0032495304,0.00006601356,0.000018253035,0.000015203609,0.00001721289,0.00026061558],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980301,0.00031512973,0.00048882375,0.00036785312,0.0005037987,0.0002942511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988541,0.00020485095,0.00013835657,0.00029880786,0.00006172314,0.00044215997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007824438,0.00017129625,0.000552846,0.00007817786,0.000098952056,0.000031184012,0.00025877744,0.00006626712,0.000103409235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055831246,0.00015626704,0.000035241075,0.0013818347,0.00017399823,0.0001384486,0.00006624745,0.0003178983,0.0000038772973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077248944,0.0003961347,0.36666292,0.005837672,0.00016470568,0.0000938068,0.017669797,0.000037703034,0.00014896068,0.33787176,0.07615923,0.19488007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003867999,0.000015498927,0.037046775,0.0016492681,0.000062833904,0.0000017185683,0.00037875297,0.000007693651,0.000036203033,0.0004954388,0.9596759,0.00024313817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5169741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97836107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.890004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003773865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001725691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6372385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309328903","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000057","title":"Mapping the Scope of Dispute Settlement in Regional Trade Agreements: Implications for the Multilateral Governance of Trade","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Settlement (finance); Corporate governance; Centrality; International trade; Typology; Regional trade; Political science; Business; Free trade; Geography","score_opus":0.13556806656693288,"score_gpt":0.2730057580859061,"score_spread":0.13743769151897323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309328903","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036249838,0.55439055,0.0013427302,0.43183017,0.0003429919,0.0030419498,0.0029425789,0.000016395166,0.0024676668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6545628,0.34164682,0.00057770486,0.0026660212,0.00007341436,0.0002967385,0.000017886423,0.00002149074,0.00013716717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982264,0.00002086508,0.0011594638,0.00028695993,0.000036459856,0.00026987144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985267,0.0002379807,0.0007035618,0.0004887124,0.000004690618,0.000038345715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059877493,0.00015540716,0.0005183019,0.000053676133,0.000063580505,0.000010811101,0.0005170388,0.000030511548,0.00007784799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003604891,0.00009587563,0.00028426386,0.00031970823,0.00010634488,0.00013779555,0.00003172937,0.00008174901,0.000010997508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002652293,0.0003028905,0.037726864,0.0020137196,0.00029347386,3.8952285e-7,0.00031309217,0.000053108735,0.00015185738,0.7895006,0.029893007,0.13972451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005471668,0.000018478724,0.37435272,0.001254495,0.00001826543,0.0000019440088,0.000008544366,0.00004130336,0.00003966328,0.0035912632,0.620004,0.00012215438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035796045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013868358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7859093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001079552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020599638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39096946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460756315","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000070","title":"<i>United States – Certain Country of Origin Labelling (Cool) Requirements (US–Cool, Article 22.6 – United States)</i>, DS384/DS386","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Authorization; International trade; Value (mathematics); Business; Settlement (finance); Political science; Law; Finance; Payment","score_opus":0.039527760124683196,"score_gpt":0.31785778916968305,"score_spread":0.27833002904499987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460756315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3154575,0.18813832,0.0023564994,0.45012015,0.003262277,0.011798704,0.0017074019,0.0033756848,0.023783492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6851788,0.29463875,0.0010015756,0.012765688,0.00028926972,0.00007154865,0.0005666508,0.00015928944,0.005328425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995759,0.00084453064,0.0010988945,0.0005105079,0.00097081054,0.0008162538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976311,0.0006070905,0.00055280444,0.00057282124,0.0002618555,0.0003743386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015470182,0.00035513885,0.0006837695,0.00039853287,0.00041391174,0.00008557214,0.00064660446,0.00008722892,0.0025255769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037649355,0.00028148026,0.00013272505,0.006548762,0.0005234029,0.0005515745,0.00006107631,0.0002206357,0.00022853474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002728572,0.0021774303,0.0704915,0.008409603,0.001158015,0.00014329134,0.009838182,0.0006083714,0.005140203,0.68767214,0.18672442,0.027364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007080642,0.000034152195,0.0010804913,0.0040695225,0.00018674429,0.0000015034379,0.0001905339,0.00006720683,0.0006414423,0.000600321,0.992017,0.0004030401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00179103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022369071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80529255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030810595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021380735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461767702","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000197","title":"John Jackson: A Tribute","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Art; Philosophy; Art history; Classics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03392591722821833,"score_gpt":0.3365287490613906,"score_spread":0.30260283183317227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461767702","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001759658,0.27381653,0.00017703377,0.4496597,0.00059619657,0.000720016,0.000011994531,0.00022894742,0.2746136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18035068,0.7679172,0.00010516824,0.005619165,0.0010057314,0.000061466475,0.0000043409946,0.00001834737,0.04491787],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990209,0.00014577096,0.00020070333,0.00015465973,0.00024255627,0.00023542643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995498,0.000076654636,0.00007094031,0.00016116846,0.000017748805,0.00012370014],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006705612,0.00007725972,0.00020646024,0.000035520436,0.00019024611,0.00002173845,0.00015409596,0.000026652937,0.0020008497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007133077,0.000049266644,0.00013634046,0.00040456187,0.00008872055,0.00013465084,0.000012173281,0.00005489951,0.000309407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023231948,0.000025515988,0.00025595058,0.00014045759,0.000012629362,0.0000047013546,0.00023396767,3.9002024e-9,0.00002953358,0.07423816,0.06588262,0.85917413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120801706,0.000009138372,0.0009865697,0.0030256046,0.000032311298,0.0000010830742,0.0000061528185,7.313342e-8,0.000010226975,0.00030265265,0.9954181,0.00008733287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008011632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009869231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92953545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006525502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006825322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466742387","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000264","title":"John H. Jackson: Pioneer and Visionary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law; QUIET; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017328685932212734,"score_gpt":0.29959725070829335,"score_spread":0.28226856477608064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466742387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014809867,0.21698296,0.00009367392,0.6952227,0.00036212805,0.00069907313,0.000008442214,0.00025264977,0.08623029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55560637,0.4150736,0.00067072635,0.00800652,0.00040230033,0.000024929574,0.0000034019974,0.00003736357,0.020174818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986935,0.0002144574,0.00025633426,0.00025307457,0.00033209578,0.00025050747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929094,0.0002060291,0.000077868724,0.00020546328,0.000025459403,0.00019423189],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050065026,0.00011909273,0.00024412274,0.00006592163,0.00026002628,0.00003121077,0.00019139441,0.000033925076,0.003762913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017354233,0.000080133075,0.0000608935,0.00079898996,0.00024013294,0.00027011088,0.00003322144,0.000072383045,0.00036643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019812662,0.000049592323,0.0019151716,0.00035786594,0.000019987481,0.0000119331435,0.00032401798,2.5554856e-8,0.00008777033,0.69771093,0.1025591,0.19696161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012932537,0.0000057087836,0.0062634293,0.0018242407,0.000030430474,0.0000040038963,0.000010215467,1.1222047e-7,0.000019974384,0.00050884613,0.9910675,0.00013618934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015580808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018947065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88850844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054997232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007221203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527819544","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000446","title":"Reforming WTO-Civil Society Engagement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Civil society; Negotiation; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Value (mathematics); Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06715491265145038,"score_gpt":0.37111151927501457,"score_spread":0.30395660662356416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527819544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013702635,0.07444985,0.000041730695,0.40916044,0.0008845736,0.001280446,0.000007040449,0.00035727286,0.51368165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7492427,0.21899296,0.0015368799,0.008196954,0.000836708,0.000056647485,0.000012199281,0.000053271557,0.021071644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998239,0.00021741675,0.00034391793,0.00029738428,0.00050089427,0.00040140515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986939,0.0000708921,0.00030700458,0.00071801833,0.000034231514,0.00017597669],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017322787,0.00015850752,0.00032452543,0.000029650932,0.0027386537,0.00021208446,0.0008466377,0.000041977546,0.001991059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003164832,0.00014492306,0.00023170465,0.00036122865,0.00032348992,0.000486186,0.00010258223,0.00026283972,0.00024743608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013406615,0.00012115672,0.0026515787,0.0018504655,0.00011161145,0.000013848455,0.0046239602,5.927753e-7,0.000045656718,0.7167183,0.1589294,0.11493207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012097551,0.0000034407994,0.0035725934,0.001439577,0.000071331444,8.2525384e-7,0.00008614658,0.0000013385037,0.000028886874,0.00020346975,0.9942896,0.00018186527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018115276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030217883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83536017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018565735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013880881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587988646","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000586","title":"<i>US–COOL</i> Retaliation: The WTO's Article 22.6 Arbitration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Revenue; International trade; Business; World trade; International economics; Market access; Economics; Law; Political science; Geography; Agriculture; Accounting","score_opus":0.08592947312171006,"score_gpt":0.25449183614743615,"score_spread":0.16856236302572608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587988646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025357055,0.26307026,0.00017591758,0.120538846,0.0012174855,0.0012427589,0.00010525865,0.00010871016,0.5881837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91793853,0.066898294,0.0001895256,0.012605155,0.000339332,0.00006255407,0.000015188937,0.00002358446,0.0019278426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986851,0.000019196359,0.00066555734,0.00032437395,0.000034029523,0.00027169587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998305,0.00003141749,0.0005849893,0.0009898521,0.000007894027,0.000080816026],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006357201,0.00016025342,0.00043002077,0.00003646433,0.00047234146,0.0002798458,0.0005518677,0.000042710537,0.0006954956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097250144,0.00013777238,0.00023118667,0.00011424366,0.00008392837,0.00048083955,0.000043540786,0.00018174961,0.0015850214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000623607,0.00007833013,0.040625546,0.0004280353,0.00008403827,0.000004315625,0.000062831066,0.000016729839,0.0000069485136,0.90221584,0.05139773,0.005073444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020096813,0.000011983326,0.107061744,0.00022896219,0.000027615208,0.000006725986,0.0000031064358,0.00020521069,0.000041499454,0.012205314,0.8798111,0.00019577162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006121034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017633918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89258146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006406426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011613878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592072136","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000283","title":"Sunshine over Shanghai: Can the WTO Illuminate the Murky World of Chinese SOEs?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); Business; Politics; International trade; Investment (military); World trade; International economics; China; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06923715656236683,"score_gpt":0.26600627088605244,"score_spread":0.1967691143236856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592072136","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053638715,0.62334335,0.000008098872,0.16132864,0.0013153289,0.0015714709,0.0006483663,0.000053497795,0.15809253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91408855,0.07649165,0.000031787076,0.004791313,0.0002048971,0.00007206447,0.000011477996,0.00003332618,0.004274916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820286,0.000033897853,0.000925399,0.00039438836,0.00005398271,0.00038944784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970687,0.00012482882,0.0010384232,0.0016627994,0.000011100536,0.00009414033],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009753879,0.00030368625,0.0010723046,0.00009554861,0.00041167313,0.00014463534,0.0014341557,0.00004138167,0.0014130634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014522388,0.00017781786,0.0006502687,0.00029543258,0.00027555478,0.00022884893,0.00015619108,0.00030358206,0.00016962117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021792102,0.00025511836,0.2760684,0.0027215914,0.0016606381,0.00001705209,0.0005404304,0.00003523891,0.0000052200485,0.6418447,0.06436946,0.012460368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002218093,0.000014065079,0.1855127,0.00028239435,0.00015617623,0.00000580689,0.000005707971,0.00008070623,0.000008542626,0.011710359,0.80174786,0.00025385505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000659598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065241368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86044985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006278321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016034952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592092604","doi":"10.1017/s147474561700009x","title":"Consolidating International Investment Law: The Mega-Regionals as a Pathway towards Multilateral Rules","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; International trade law; International economic law; Multilateralism; International law; Investment (military); General partnership; Political science; Brexit; Foreign direct investment; European union; Economics; Public international law; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04903472869731897,"score_gpt":0.3004074239665645,"score_spread":0.25137269526924555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592092604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006261122,0.0034169855,0.000010642057,0.10629858,0.00072128646,0.0005681046,0.000010071776,0.00007486371,0.88827336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36217722,0.0020241733,0.0002883348,0.6298811,0.001698869,0.00018296932,0.0001581644,0.000032536867,0.0035566553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985459,0.000025358693,0.00045419135,0.00027383846,0.00048566828,0.00021503336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888444,0.00003682063,0.0005358133,0.00042266736,0.000097399155,0.00002283674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048576287,0.0002190479,0.00025248513,0.000075038086,0.0006751769,0.0009100547,0.00086877873,0.000026540409,0.0015325116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017524608,0.00014542193,0.00020279158,0.00006936172,0.00020291253,0.0012622868,0.0002041806,0.00017108185,0.00076990196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053053723,0.00005180757,0.00008493158,0.00021665696,0.000063347754,0.000010013603,0.000014399797,0.0000015358352,0.000038154627,0.9838263,0.013285169,0.0024023869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031035068,0.000003478776,0.0015281655,0.0013794557,0.000049011393,0.000009140961,0.0000064578194,0.00059245806,0.000112617585,0.013528046,0.9822951,0.00018571089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000484027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025158993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97029823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004622711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041963496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593397345","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000210","title":"A Network Anatomy of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Unobservable; China; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Globalization; Business; Economic system; Law and economics; Political science; Market economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.024545281156084536,"score_gpt":0.2780979417230577,"score_spread":0.2535526605669731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593397345","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27816948,0.35861367,0.00014694757,0.034916162,0.0031805907,0.004378874,0.00002538962,0.00064437545,0.3199245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988909,0.0059902146,0.000066125176,0.0026322107,0.0008680833,0.000020830757,0.000017609927,0.000025623563,0.0014703167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989559,0.000010649986,0.0003964301,0.00022023289,0.00018081054,0.00023594633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986117,0.000021066964,0.0006558967,0.000655434,0.00003971649,0.000016226017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002576868,0.00019374397,0.0005207853,0.00007568848,0.00030666468,0.00019832076,0.00053167157,0.000016721116,0.0006649841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017817072,0.00013371193,0.00017309493,0.00021813189,0.00008539239,0.000635807,0.00013560693,0.00010246065,0.00014239263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000964957,0.00044415705,0.3651462,0.032167494,0.00026341373,0.00017330656,0.000057516252,0.000014538845,0.000026275313,0.35074165,0.14599907,0.104869865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031779145,0.0000042189286,0.11613242,0.0037303984,0.0001101636,0.0000011525142,4.954581e-7,0.000026852234,0.0000014391253,0.059909508,0.8195331,0.00023245138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000789665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009218413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7107395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008333518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001413522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72811097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599639032","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000616","title":"The ‘Development’ Discourse in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Odds; Developing country; International trade; Economics; Political science; Differential treatment; International economics; Law and economics; Law; Economic growth; Legislature","score_opus":0.04575689362627034,"score_gpt":0.38551164205016747,"score_spread":0.33975474842389713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599639032","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025868858,0.068975694,0.00001201731,0.7876129,0.0013171718,0.0020512128,0.0000045480847,0.0002220327,0.13721752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734382,0.020726513,0.00038253207,0.0010499678,0.000194428,0.00004267146,0.0000033168278,0.000026795999,0.004135592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981341,0.00025851993,0.0004701354,0.0002643391,0.00040002697,0.00047290316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892825,0.00014496269,0.0002687879,0.00052837917,0.000009335238,0.00012028255],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012850001,0.0001615585,0.00028782382,0.000051093815,0.0023969263,0.00036853968,0.0010148457,0.000036889684,0.00019576112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002856299,0.00011998309,0.00008376805,0.00037401868,0.00047927164,0.00041823467,0.00006100298,0.00024987277,0.00007162614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064128376,0.00015614754,0.036916673,0.00058329996,0.000052856496,0.000042532178,0.009255333,0.000002398274,0.000018585766,0.61043304,0.008531002,0.33400172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015540235,0.0000014134938,0.10447858,0.0015037457,0.000016335336,8.5105074e-7,0.00008257566,0.000002462492,0.000019839908,0.000115468174,0.8934642,0.00015908589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011163154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03019711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013151266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019109806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612543568","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000246","title":"The Treatment of Chinese SOEs in China's WTO Protocol of Accession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Accession; China; Economic reform; State (computer science); Business; World trade; International trade; Point (geometry); State owned; Political science; Economics; Market economy; European union; Law","score_opus":0.07827721028724036,"score_gpt":0.3235017335491103,"score_spread":0.24522452326186997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612543568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24433604,0.3693389,0.000014169553,0.030952018,0.0010260135,0.14312734,0.0003211144,0.00004731044,0.2108371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8320596,0.15486681,0.00012484234,0.000080832426,0.000065457476,0.01230728,0.000003875953,0.000018435432,0.00047282307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987392,0.000014978346,0.00085099554,0.0002035569,0.000018795945,0.00017247756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835044,0.000033286735,0.00088804174,0.0006848875,0.000004228442,0.000039118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033397015,0.00013961754,0.0006705778,0.00006530597,0.00011084435,0.00003666469,0.00045711917,0.000030071693,0.000092896524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004973035,0.000092736074,0.00021096738,0.000117279225,0.000076103766,0.0001639452,0.000029711235,0.000055837834,0.000029263427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048903683,0.0007109771,0.78180856,0.0028481362,0.00007739656,0.0000037954117,0.00016865513,0.000010597372,0.0000054148495,0.08419135,0.00061346445,0.12951273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064077036,0.000084394596,0.52972245,0.0006645719,0.000006106385,8.0641075e-7,0.0000018834487,0.00004727114,0.000041929212,0.008777047,0.45990843,0.000104370505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022225232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004242775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5877236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005878482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013475415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37816674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726456532","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000155","title":"Firms’ Integration into Value Chains and Compliance with Adverse WTO Panel Rulings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Politics; Business; Control (management); Variation (astronomy); Panel data; Law and economics; International economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07154852034664955,"score_gpt":0.34156679115799204,"score_spread":0.2700182708113425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726456532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064505464,0.11623444,0.0016609071,0.76102924,0.0009866095,0.00469811,0.000022608692,0.00070524076,0.108212315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94858426,0.042482506,0.002774288,0.0024714668,0.00018808227,0.000030205858,0.000010135581,0.000028201433,0.0034308836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987161,0.00013677604,0.00025914848,0.00031905086,0.00032477506,0.00024410436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989879,0.00006472849,0.00028465898,0.00043872726,0.000051102306,0.00017288017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050059584,0.00016933048,0.00033002783,0.000048546266,0.0012220665,0.00014988752,0.00041772865,0.000038060647,0.00017975958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000243288,0.00014013315,0.000050480925,0.0003555955,0.00052749744,0.0005024883,0.000039106228,0.00017906362,0.00005989991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008966798,0.00009160163,0.008225046,0.0016615696,0.00005119224,0.000023396327,0.0063225427,0.0000030068188,0.000053942273,0.89364916,0.0035702228,0.08633937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037235106,0.00002647837,0.04105827,0.0072890655,0.00012763504,0.000006822246,0.00020711448,0.000046828165,0.00005181607,0.00072220084,0.9497237,0.0003676891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068166194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070905816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9461535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008458445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000994133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93992704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760887835","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000350","title":"<i>China – Anti-dumping Measures on Imports of Cellulose Pulp from Canada</i> (<i>China–Cellulose Pulp</i>), DS483","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; China; Christian ministry; Duty; Business; Pulp (tooth); Cellulose; International trade; Pulp and paper industry; Agricultural economics; Economics; Engineering; Political science; Law; Medicine; Chemical engineering","score_opus":0.05328808047684993,"score_gpt":0.22747915774627503,"score_spread":0.1741910772694251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760887835","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35596666,0.46775842,0.000070868,0.024248173,0.003408389,0.0016953368,0.0018785838,0.00010314861,0.14487043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92923486,0.067706764,0.00017863618,0.0018482553,0.00021156445,0.000022404118,0.000070584625,0.00006123194,0.000665712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966012,0.00004534278,0.0016917654,0.000877058,0.0001340923,0.0006505336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961585,0.000052214713,0.0017906923,0.0016765097,0.000014003133,0.00030808177],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007963581,0.000493213,0.0017305453,0.00014815775,0.00028063133,0.00015244292,0.0011141306,0.0001155509,0.00064575695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015974698,0.000540115,0.0004727389,0.00018392224,0.000113749,0.00035726116,0.00012138484,0.00043254934,0.00016179259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012346444,0.0015232362,0.42058766,0.0092160385,0.0015941103,0.00055253744,0.0004940858,0.0002207139,0.00028785807,0.2706238,0.21650086,0.078275636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006297944,0.000045206005,0.32509172,0.0022585576,0.00010573384,0.000008492547,0.000005082998,0.00008828263,0.0010959666,0.00477175,0.6650939,0.0008055311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28742728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098377034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5732682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025661715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015787852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762616486","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000337","title":"<i>Canada – Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports of Certain Carbon Steel Welded Pipe from the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (Canada–Welded Pipe)</i>, DS483","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Welding; China; Carbon fibers; Business; International trade; Political science; Metallurgy; Law; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.02141157827600998,"score_gpt":0.26509996568630023,"score_spread":0.24368838741029025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762616486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21587378,0.21206476,0.000008310797,0.47402385,0.0040683933,0.007157378,0.00074884976,0.0002130488,0.085841626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986743,0.010674122,0.000031054784,0.0017701888,0.00021296793,0.000017072727,0.000014346555,0.000039544728,0.0004977457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965562,0.0005905143,0.00081431214,0.00045230257,0.0011518553,0.00043481516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743974,0.00031413406,0.0010150509,0.0009421348,0.00007142748,0.00021751178],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096437795,0.00031622275,0.00087212183,0.00005107712,0.0007058599,0.000089899375,0.0009366287,0.0000690323,0.00016763333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003153514,0.0002548076,0.00010710689,0.00032763445,0.00048326937,0.0001702013,0.000088650006,0.00029846205,8.2643226e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022856277,0.0010128221,0.41793776,0.012794171,0.0025811035,0.0005710118,0.0107595185,0.00011931976,0.01747612,0.08834999,0.34795246,0.10021718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004255257,0.000017169206,0.11416818,0.0034640557,0.0002751057,0.0000020631182,0.0002573132,0.0000069833864,0.0024708898,0.00008056344,0.8784439,0.00038823715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9216848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7708692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024692324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019261679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767498438","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000386","title":"<i>Eli Lilly and Company</i> v. <i>The Government of Canada</i>, Case No. UNCT/14/2","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Management; Plaintiff; Arbitration; Government (linguistics); Respondent; Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Business; Economics; Finance; Philosophy; Payment","score_opus":0.01886910478737266,"score_gpt":0.2249290009177557,"score_spread":0.20605989613038303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767498438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024986134,0.018182628,0.0000064362393,0.07263713,0.0007755078,0.00066445355,0.0000193142,0.00002205432,0.90519387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85469496,0.004280433,0.00005994991,0.1368786,0.0005349507,0.000025771276,0.000007866427,0.000016641385,0.0035008027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902576,0.0000100122525,0.00028448357,0.00013448352,0.0004197824,0.00012549829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992432,0.000029357745,0.00036420993,0.00029147379,0.000056249515,0.000015506475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027242565,0.00011812561,0.0002074049,0.000012977384,0.00033947077,0.00012411019,0.00023931204,0.000009777777,0.00025589904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009518943,0.00007974143,0.00005588482,0.000059677306,0.00008272217,0.00031885513,0.000080468555,0.00008394599,0.000018164108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001092375,0.0000637122,0.0015719242,0.0026777294,0.00005821053,0.00012850564,0.000006347421,0.0000015054004,0.000045094926,0.55504364,0.4339757,0.006416675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018181563,0.0000024651347,0.0021515884,0.0008497586,0.000068454574,0.000024961368,0.000005037834,0.00019228397,0.000023360732,0.00019123458,0.9962095,0.00009954766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020067884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12903157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90169305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032729484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003945504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799864725","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000593","title":"The Analogue Method Comes Unfastened – The Awkward Space between Market and Non-Market Economies in <i>EC–Fasteners (Article 21.5)</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; China; European union; People's Republic; Space (punctuation); Economics; International trade; Law and economics; Economy; International economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038497200710734585,"score_gpt":0.25383784343548793,"score_spread":0.21534064272475334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799864725","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085066125,0.3737943,0.00046022242,0.21546642,0.0013240885,0.0030832833,0.0005157177,0.00011798262,0.3201719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8385312,0.1511287,0.0015481522,0.0056341104,0.000373254,0.00011083003,0.000010616254,0.00005683789,0.0026063197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975866,0.00015342818,0.0010695001,0.0005510479,0.000040976527,0.00059846503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796486,0.00076131045,0.00042147114,0.00068774575,0.0000130662975,0.00015157668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030885532,0.0003023334,0.0009264013,0.00012783629,0.0003136181,0.00018600479,0.0005810297,0.00007156717,0.0002714856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013623764,0.00022391161,0.0002170716,0.0005793275,0.00032598063,0.0002609234,0.00013010585,0.00027804112,0.00020579425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010820099,0.00012878818,0.57639027,0.0013964808,0.0007619467,0.00001203331,0.0007039772,0.00004023118,0.00000445217,0.13963892,0.18893532,0.091879405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046382792,0.00004540529,0.212579,0.00031432655,0.000050290037,0.000008251496,0.000099569545,0.0010207649,0.000016957565,0.00605535,0.7790248,0.00032146866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020585886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001456847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75346506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001106382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027801916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9130851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811416109","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000435","title":"Learning about Digital Trade: Privacy and E-Commerce in CETA and TPP","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; European union; International trade; Free trade agreement; State (computer science); Member state; Personally identifiable information; Work (physics); Business; Political science; Free trade; Member states; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0409335125693818,"score_gpt":0.22697634828678914,"score_spread":0.18604283571740735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811416109","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45177472,0.47477403,0.0000053714107,0.009833788,0.00017987104,0.0006890764,0.000050646442,0.00004508235,0.06264742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84052247,0.1574437,0.00006561333,0.0012139926,0.000028923478,0.000010171557,0.000013345991,0.000021700069,0.00068006746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855584,0.000015352063,0.000650143,0.00044865347,0.00002171683,0.00030827313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993869,0.00006140845,0.00020094837,0.0002394363,0.0000015248232,0.00010979328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032677205,0.0001936432,0.0007246558,0.0001368259,0.000039972903,0.00012367063,0.00016072465,0.000053736447,0.00017872533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043313987,0.00021892002,0.00009211579,0.00025534705,0.000041072373,0.00043126283,0.000060927323,0.00029702028,0.00031264493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070244932,0.000086188156,0.833042,0.0025809992,0.00005156199,0.000007026922,0.0003004915,0.000016682927,0.0000017635105,0.09639624,0.00121679,0.06629322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041987756,0.000031116713,0.29993418,0.00068758585,0.0000076351425,0.000016670892,0.000014642023,0.0001918673,6.376842e-7,0.0012500815,0.69719845,0.00024722947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017676473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011339369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6959817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046721958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000074498953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89272994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885667906","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000198","title":"What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; The Internet; International trade; Censorship; Reputation; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04026959468388808,"score_gpt":0.31927901638980544,"score_spread":0.27900942170591736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885667906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028314232,0.7702873,0.000030863022,0.15509886,0.001714808,0.0014951067,0.000018212111,0.00031136486,0.07076036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20862183,0.7766452,0.00007914465,0.0021756021,0.001720934,0.00019221392,0.000005546632,0.000032690317,0.010526822],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790436,0.00018445085,0.0004135402,0.00042559687,0.00054119626,0.0005308596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911475,0.0000877613,0.00024935754,0.00030067566,0.00008003298,0.00016741233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005344894,0.00024672857,0.0005079924,0.00008100414,0.0014157704,0.0006840011,0.00037247836,0.000073545074,0.000906217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015879242,0.0002229629,0.00027863024,0.000751769,0.00073419284,0.0013111159,0.00009159136,0.00029887087,0.00029459852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000814605,0.00013491852,0.00027581604,0.0021399483,0.00013888619,0.000026934318,0.03160659,9.250816e-8,0.000003051432,0.02087859,0.058264297,0.8865227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010738874,0.000022474958,0.0003781447,0.014844831,0.000065531225,0.0000056846743,0.0033669537,5.3032454e-7,0.000010216556,0.0038223083,0.97709465,0.00028130616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001975083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013724821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91883034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012832556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009092327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924731061","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000459","title":"Trade Commitments and Data Flows: The National Security Wildcard","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; National security; European union; Focus (optics); Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.05944689069359935,"score_gpt":0.3562055709195979,"score_spread":0.2967586802259986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924731061","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008961899,0.16528259,0.0000055577348,0.6616537,0.00073758437,0.0031472459,0.00019840283,0.00023134371,0.1678474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084866,0.075413436,0.00024026043,0.014114195,0.00035200253,0.000021755988,0.00011391841,0.000028018805,0.0012298034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794805,0.00044463834,0.00029582673,0.00036105487,0.00070560904,0.00024479182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901485,0.00026234705,0.000113266666,0.00047683486,0.000019716977,0.00011299508],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013989537,0.00013996611,0.00027413687,0.000040625,0.00035334876,0.000099452416,0.00087326975,0.000035081193,0.0009638185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016423769,0.0001058034,0.00005147402,0.0008693529,0.00018907923,0.00040507258,0.00012209815,0.00022036197,0.00015876401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031276952,0.00013910244,0.006130251,0.0010035797,0.00012376609,0.0000023885389,0.0018858208,0.0000022548463,0.000010947079,0.75263965,0.23018023,0.007878891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016218089,0.000004125168,0.0042596506,0.00051807036,0.000060884937,0.0000030649999,0.000053178388,0.00003649989,0.000001707964,0.0008130496,0.9939571,0.00013046694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058505797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006891967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9075904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007407859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013197203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2930275906","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000460","title":"Mapping the New Frontier of International IP Law: Introducing a TRIPs-plus Dataset","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Intellectual property; TRIPS Agreement; Frontier; Consistency (knowledge bases); Order (exchange); International trade; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.11453585366461645,"score_gpt":0.24742082652544484,"score_spread":0.1328849728608284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2930275906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020819947,0.3581669,0.0015943319,0.1769424,0.0096403025,0.0054681553,0.00020215595,0.00023279646,0.445671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71071243,0.044420313,0.0013422362,0.18969627,0.010274359,0.0000875599,0.0041305153,0.00016477998,0.03917154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990043,0.000020883826,0.00036837734,0.00021428862,0.00022903323,0.00016313998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999377,0.000039500825,0.0002034582,0.00034158988,0.00002938105,0.000009040678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004885417,0.0001308151,0.00029730308,0.00009671676,0.000062112755,0.00007965593,0.00049290265,0.00001937735,0.0037367484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080608195,0.00008131378,0.00010609176,0.00041514225,0.000027668324,0.0004472697,0.00013262594,0.00017416842,0.0010934306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027117727,0.000029846185,0.00025280667,0.0025355837,0.00009584519,0.0000019774561,0.0000639467,0.000017210936,0.00006882155,0.01095231,0.9420632,0.043891292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002644056,0.0000025509426,0.0001768096,0.0022711826,0.00005427805,0.0000020249354,0.000017110586,0.00057472533,0.000019939558,0.00017863877,0.99632853,0.00010982933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042172192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007353642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70863044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020659963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001997179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2931738767","doi":"10.1017/s147474561900003x","title":"<i>China–Cellulose Pulp</i>: China's Quest to Satisfy WTO Panels and the Appellate Body","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; China; Economics; World trade; Protectionism; International trade; International economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02451014471661456,"score_gpt":0.21485887981630014,"score_spread":0.19034873509968558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2931738767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07887085,0.5740046,0.00015364446,0.09737676,0.0014624813,0.0042428514,0.00021840888,0.0001328103,0.24353758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547076,0.13332373,0.00020593568,0.0069642067,0.00012353674,0.000052798176,0.000015154028,0.000042725926,0.0045643356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997915,0.000051883293,0.0009198948,0.0006131668,0.00004499958,0.00045503056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987249,0.000055471162,0.00032808018,0.0006858567,0.000005075448,0.00020061879],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010657393,0.0003072023,0.0010783143,0.000116454736,0.00008853257,0.00013154371,0.00042242146,0.000064436135,0.0008153246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004307617,0.0002580559,0.0002528231,0.00041712727,0.000074746575,0.00018701542,0.00010403803,0.0002883248,0.0045688055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035060188,0.0000721873,0.01248866,0.0017784543,0.0001314461,0.000007012779,0.00034031252,0.00003853711,0.000006169483,0.95885116,0.010355107,0.01589592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008689308,0.0000423303,0.08514914,0.00075051916,0.0000424321,0.000023510513,0.00000562952,0.00019592531,0.0000135771925,0.01038472,0.9020884,0.00043490165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003743018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005562112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9484664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006467304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013830541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945768354","doi":"10.1017/s147474561900020x","title":"Three Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: The Conundrum of the US Steel and Aluminum Tariffs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; International trade; China; Member states; Political science; Business; International economics; European union; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015234872758322873,"score_gpt":0.2579629147767578,"score_spread":0.24272804201843495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945768354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027485821,0.18078235,0.000011928401,0.6519736,0.0017185924,0.0065902425,0.000051897347,0.00016572287,0.13121983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766028,0.012754316,0.00007990623,0.0048756455,0.000120530945,0.000021707705,0.0000018699375,0.000026155722,0.005517068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981665,0.00030811678,0.00040422444,0.00027535483,0.0005497853,0.0002960279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987839,0.00024183645,0.00026662927,0.00058218243,0.00004064047,0.000084830994],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089384965,0.00016587361,0.00039573174,0.00003402182,0.00034793312,0.00007245157,0.00068395026,0.000049246413,0.0015710758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009238468,0.000093684044,0.00014353747,0.0011193373,0.0006167853,0.00011028382,0.00009063037,0.00025076963,0.000092584276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000389602,0.000054477816,0.021633435,0.0008916981,0.00006227838,0.000001781775,0.0013153924,0.000001103962,0.00007264848,0.95643187,0.007958034,0.011573364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017982308,0.000008046912,0.061769303,0.0010079865,0.00011060116,0.000003699469,0.000055103366,0.0000025859888,0.00006597556,0.00053544895,0.9361306,0.00013082814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027381713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010759669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95589644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004757294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014661196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977486763","doi":"10.1017/s1474745619000351","title":"NAFTA 2.0: The Greenest Trade Agreement Ever?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade agreement; International trade; Agreement; Precautionary principle; Political science; Settlement (finance); Business; Free trade; Ecology","score_opus":0.09721664171755458,"score_gpt":0.26202189613413973,"score_spread":0.16480525441658517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977486763","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011978939,0.6230298,0.000019230461,0.15579613,0.0014568701,0.0020469674,0.0003653718,0.00007951615,0.20522715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47632405,0.47143978,0.00015473217,0.041482564,0.0006197046,0.00019825314,0.00008831965,0.000086704466,0.009605897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983274,0.00002466582,0.0007962496,0.00040898108,0.000037006164,0.00040569843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873453,0.00008695129,0.00035466644,0.0007274507,0.0000027524932,0.000093664654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073682214,0.00022052943,0.00066288223,0.00010359992,0.000094821226,0.000051699113,0.00046306956,0.000045544526,0.00454466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022303684,0.00018899441,0.00030143102,0.0003534339,0.000042984957,0.00015059528,0.00006367769,0.00020891859,0.007023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013323265,0.00023172436,0.0448577,0.0053784717,0.00025399774,0.000007225314,0.0005637985,0.000026370059,0.0000059432305,0.8258664,0.095392674,0.02740234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024980953,0.000020824153,0.017261762,0.0005257035,0.000022637303,0.000010107681,0.000013007319,0.00012761597,0.000005396794,0.0027150328,0.9787817,0.0002664093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009542282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021577725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.883389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118491866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011606046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995091733","doi":"10.1017/s147474562000004x","title":"Subsidy Determination, Benchmarks, and Adverse Inferences: Assessing ‘Benefit' in US–Coated Paper (Indonesia)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Respondent; Disadvantage; Business; Benchmarking; Public economics; Scope (computer science); Government (linguistics); Margin (machine learning); Natural resource; Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Marketing; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.08018024355736121,"score_gpt":0.25120546296538154,"score_spread":0.17102521940802035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995091733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50973105,0.39799064,0.000102105536,0.03380049,0.0003700787,0.001274345,0.00014353817,0.000097903765,0.056489848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046547,0.08819424,0.00039765236,0.0065541803,0.000054277738,0.000028762417,0.00005940335,0.000019359977,0.000037460315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825597,0.000023725192,0.00090806873,0.00048695202,0.00003209683,0.00029321513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992718,0.00005362988,0.0003062519,0.00019839342,0.000008604059,0.00016131067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033753618,0.00021061015,0.0006997059,0.00013348307,0.000058299105,0.00007711977,0.00018382749,0.00006828125,0.00082839053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006933928,0.00024164568,0.00010866127,0.0006071941,0.000045323693,0.00067212567,0.000042447842,0.00020567646,0.00013788919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009519897,0.00012326926,0.89664984,0.00324371,0.000053872765,0.000040453066,0.0003108741,0.000047984784,0.000015595728,0.059199918,0.0017155869,0.03858939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008619856,0.000038397095,0.6429816,0.001453529,0.000037263493,0.000011824099,0.000043523953,0.0017166771,0.00001344865,0.0027365335,0.34948397,0.000621257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006999936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003158265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3949236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006742401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022897073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98540246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995581391","doi":"10.1017/s1474745620000075","title":"Baptists and Bootleggers in the Biodiesel Trade: <i>EU–Biodiesel (Indonesia)</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Oil Palm Production and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; International trade; Biodiesel; Subsidy; Business; Domestic market; International economics; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.02235594337336267,"score_gpt":0.24844128122566725,"score_spread":0.22608533785230459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995581391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020974968,0.1065227,0.000010391711,0.8521813,0.00013757909,0.0018640802,0.000013822939,0.000108652304,0.018186484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92362016,0.03507212,0.0001409737,0.040895484,0.0000616166,0.00007228429,0.0000045499264,0.000013311007,0.00011946765],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834704,0.0002822454,0.0003408166,0.00046057245,0.00028056285,0.00028876492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994278,0.000069055255,0.00006535701,0.00030284718,0.0000016855043,0.00013325027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006539163,0.00018480881,0.00031823,0.000020096633,0.00011950431,0.00003156899,0.00028044268,0.000028583154,0.00040599797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089125955,0.00012741318,0.00009068703,0.000826179,0.00031973567,0.00014418425,0.00006335214,0.00028038427,0.000110803674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051592026,0.00044992502,0.2094467,0.008028146,0.000037361762,0.00011551439,0.0068657445,0.000025045583,0.0002665308,0.0021512576,0.36075243,0.41180977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019732791,0.000026838346,0.16600597,0.00012371899,0.000027097518,0.000016291773,0.00016861373,0.000020787073,0.000013759556,0.00007961303,0.83315,0.0001699634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003651605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009679928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90264523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006780574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011252028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5195759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034688245","doi":"10.1017/s1474745620000245","title":"<i>United States – Countervailing Measures on Supercalendered Paper from Canada</i>, DS505","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Duty; Relation (database); Political science; Measure (data warehouse); International trade; Business; Public economics; Economics; Law; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.04383543832170432,"score_gpt":0.27023843796459535,"score_spread":0.226402999642891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034688245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014575741,0.08599764,0.000023109435,0.8982528,0.0004060056,0.000905593,0.00024118496,0.00034726676,0.012368812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74698365,0.08379684,0.00014049192,0.167904,0.00046084463,0.00001845239,0.0002703649,0.00005678078,0.00036858834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731404,0.0004962701,0.0004716276,0.00041596682,0.0009055093,0.00039661082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882776,0.0003296181,0.000108576634,0.00025764538,0.000062910425,0.00041351168],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031727238,0.00023490092,0.00046042664,0.000049766124,0.00035412924,0.00008013973,0.00046486323,0.00004253211,0.0035134212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003643384,0.00022140668,0.00010142464,0.001676134,0.000119895485,0.00018856495,0.00002458848,0.00029443018,0.000107439424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003815494,0.00019369727,0.0047804457,0.0016236558,0.0003358531,0.00012504663,0.008709845,0.00021122617,0.00024246982,0.06707675,0.89671946,0.019943394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018021885,0.000009754481,0.0011709535,0.0010443043,0.000083338375,2.7239943e-7,0.0002594304,0.000016820219,0.000069649264,0.00005360627,0.9968575,0.0002541258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27098867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7489834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7455261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022983135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005289279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049361211","doi":"10.1017/s147474562000035x","title":"Introducing the Electronic Database of Investment Treaties (EDIT): The Genesis of a New Database and Its Use","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Database; Computer science; Electronic database; Investment (military); Intelligent database; Information retrieval; Politics; Database design; Database schema; Political science; Database testing; Law","score_opus":0.0511446422888861,"score_gpt":0.25453318599440156,"score_spread":0.20338854370551546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049361211","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048744727,0.5251912,0.0002863749,0.40503147,0.00038965433,0.004033495,0.000112429036,0.00012216202,0.016088482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51178193,0.1103681,0.00038947232,0.37412536,0.0020976008,0.000095351,0.00034441732,0.000051448405,0.0007462912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906087,0.000032545136,0.00036431313,0.00017983397,0.00023467942,0.00012778403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936163,0.00007727205,0.0002745926,0.0002266886,0.000043248583,0.000016578148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027875198,0.00012773291,0.00022603142,0.00004719024,0.00008288857,0.000056026805,0.00023396463,0.000008327868,0.00023579088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019834533,0.00007116801,0.00007126774,0.00043122622,0.000061220155,0.0006901751,0.000098395256,0.00010080464,0.00001555128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001641334,0.000037092366,0.00022326635,0.0021729458,0.00007921575,8.648147e-7,0.00009553767,0.000008498315,0.00073496025,0.93942326,0.05617641,0.0010315437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028185942,0.000014942048,0.0007654909,0.0011469073,0.00035220728,0.0000015736636,0.00003765134,0.0015720706,0.0006562112,0.00038068462,0.99467355,0.00011686506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033305437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012775762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93904257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011436437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046153233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29021472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086891586","doi":"10.1017/s1474745620000269","title":"Western Europe's Long Retreat from Coal and Implications for Energy Trade","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Coal; Subsidy; Economics; Industrialisation; Competition (biology); Coal mining; Natural resource economics; Unemployment; International trade; Fossil fuel; Business; Economy; Economic policy; Market economy; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.03215624309566719,"score_gpt":0.24025814360132167,"score_spread":0.20810190050565447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086891586","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011452705,0.9201539,0.01247748,0.054833364,0.00012162287,0.0006261961,0.0000991584,0.0004953488,0.010047656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7720293,0.21890923,0.00095233246,0.0064798053,0.0005488451,0.00017486337,0.00014613358,0.000104203486,0.0006553114],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994461,0.000019980762,0.00018643998,0.00015433326,0.00004517499,0.00014794922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996554,0.00004898719,0.000023886454,0.00014886893,0.0000018818243,0.00012096905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004018817,0.00012120016,0.00023143437,0.000026468793,0.000034468638,0.000019289762,0.00009603322,0.000016099,0.000023096009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006677136,0.00010597144,0.000057666588,0.00020100574,0.000012453204,0.000024793304,0.000018027176,0.00006317388,0.000007258707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007764441,0.000057296827,0.009100995,0.010571261,0.00040291177,0.000012105595,0.00068236934,0.00047454596,0.00029725893,0.0068168007,0.13373825,0.8378384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012269686,0.000009727802,0.013936782,0.0006059843,0.00015660252,0.0000021116095,0.0000027379033,0.00039388085,0.000025605867,0.0000040225805,0.98461634,0.00012352377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000022541026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000086189475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85087806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009090686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021510684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43213898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088788269","doi":"10.1017/s1474745620000385","title":"<i>Mi casa es tu casa</i>? The Limits of Inter-systemic Dispute Resolution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Government (linguistics); Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Agreement; Legal culture; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05220505218201862,"score_gpt":0.2608742738053493,"score_spread":0.20866922162333065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088788269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070331404,0.1585792,0.0010163495,0.4180914,0.0015019195,0.00297039,0.000026152848,0.00036515328,0.41041633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88469356,0.004549891,0.00004139852,0.10972323,0.000652082,0.000034572586,0.000034563942,0.000015890982,0.00025478317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990025,0.000031328906,0.00044537228,0.00017394137,0.00021860252,0.0001282227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944574,0.000036043228,0.000293858,0.00015669549,0.000053236385,0.000014434929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023462716,0.00013047617,0.00023585523,0.00005079242,0.0000790909,0.00006575465,0.00027507046,0.00001747615,0.0002902082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007833791,0.00008887417,0.0001534827,0.0004720645,0.00004735773,0.00039778033,0.00004997281,0.00012353982,0.00026908927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001707636,0.000052258085,0.0005951967,0.005142052,0.00006448187,0.000009828651,0.000060303773,0.000011476853,0.0005228933,0.8789285,0.11013219,0.004463749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016517374,0.000007820727,0.0006486854,0.0025545643,0.00010978753,0.000009673336,0.000013844608,0.0011304647,0.00008926909,0.00024028712,0.9949102,0.000120245044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044345303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006140214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.884778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017995882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000136116005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36241835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121279842","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000226","title":"Shining a light on fossil fuel subsidies at the WTO: how NGOs can contribute to WTO notification and surveillance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Business; Fossil fuel; International trade; International economics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.020316713702025285,"score_gpt":0.2757966118780876,"score_spread":0.2554798981760623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121279842","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011850038,0.06103782,0.000042995707,0.92613465,0.00027882968,0.0011530786,0.000022231032,0.00014173995,0.01000367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96753293,0.02203472,0.00004584462,0.0057352907,0.00025581365,0.00006803035,0.000012089011,0.000025298787,0.0042899754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978309,0.0006891515,0.00028562624,0.00039320096,0.00043621828,0.0003648934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985947,0.0005324996,0.00019114654,0.0004148722,0.000062026236,0.0002047681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014476381,0.00019828154,0.0004064789,0.000060115894,0.0007419939,0.00019402122,0.00034307988,0.000041249743,0.000120866076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009563527,0.00014227738,0.00007255225,0.0010398688,0.00021350216,0.00010831648,0.00004520875,0.00015465764,0.0000700924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025515563,0.00010362279,0.023080446,0.0016763044,0.0001070831,0.000005571543,0.010665251,0.000010027295,0.000514003,0.76097727,0.13367504,0.06915985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013768408,0.000015727852,0.030738406,0.0006297219,0.000028536726,0.0000014690994,0.00005172272,0.000003252205,0.00012532788,0.00011948278,0.9679581,0.0001905798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102828526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041883122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96634793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015204719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048519523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121914165","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000379","title":"Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Enforcement; Normative; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Product (mathematics); Bargaining power; Power (physics); Economics; Business; International trade; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011987065633718732,"score_gpt":0.3094595024585622,"score_spread":0.2974724368248435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121914165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012961008,0.11126915,0.00005934761,0.82264704,0.0003163918,0.0012686704,0.000032698434,0.00014440925,0.064132676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30074522,0.6642659,0.0003718574,0.015238063,0.0006344011,0.00007754852,0.0000033204726,0.000053512413,0.018610194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817485,0.00047667447,0.0002884123,0.00023414871,0.0005605935,0.00026535295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896413,0.00040606782,0.00013787775,0.00028422577,0.00008114788,0.00012654699],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014696146,0.00013673899,0.00033536664,0.00003449552,0.0004442893,0.000055248114,0.0003128456,0.000029348754,0.0015536443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096156856,0.000066785404,0.00008443724,0.00067695376,0.00093908596,0.00018704458,0.00005429416,0.000102350576,0.00009077451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010531999,0.000012609029,0.00039286367,0.00026138182,0.000028806739,0.0000035281728,0.0007683731,2.386646e-8,0.000015790547,0.92838687,0.039882183,0.030237056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004856236,0.000004516463,0.00085245556,0.0018198771,0.00006183629,0.0000019494294,0.00001772872,1.8559236e-7,0.000023274293,0.0009959748,0.9956192,0.000117421725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025965019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003740814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012382996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001286465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123111527","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000496","title":"The Effect of Binding Commitments on Services Trade","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Restrictiveness; Market access; Trade barrier; International economics; Gravity model of trade; Trade in services; International trade; Free trade; Business; Index (typography); Bilateral trade; Economics; Geography; China; Computer science","score_opus":0.03266053105939871,"score_gpt":0.23620527776132427,"score_spread":0.20354474670192557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123111527","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3733095,0.4327799,0.0000015193336,0.012184584,0.0016491658,0.0024341266,0.00022853925,0.0000670223,0.17734563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93039674,0.06770141,0.00001879709,0.0011999815,0.000041936517,0.000032491604,0.000016398173,0.000023560018,0.00056868384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987012,0.000038277252,0.0006744145,0.00027592864,0.000036754176,0.00027338334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988425,0.00020778952,0.00040975484,0.00047811074,0.0000014252253,0.000060421527],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068298064,0.00018226403,0.00069595524,0.00008002303,0.000079956764,0.00003618717,0.00041576356,0.00003826823,0.00018935204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011040663,0.0001397727,0.0002669005,0.00027575457,0.000027619823,0.000103344966,0.000027400285,0.00015722276,0.001659421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011461136,0.00021570458,0.39843225,0.019849047,0.0007405931,0.0000058029914,0.00015187277,0.00008224195,0.00003188007,0.5165926,0.013229171,0.050554186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000629908,0.00022564115,0.015893292,0.0018302797,0.000032930595,0.0000026529403,0.0000057471216,0.00007541364,0.00018790386,0.0006041998,0.9802944,0.00021764333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015708178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016295671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064213724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038240278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123846870","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000063","title":"<i>Canada–Renewable Energy:</i> Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So-Green Subsidies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Tariff; Renewable energy; Tribunal; Jurisprudence; Arbitration; Government (linguistics); Investment (military); Electricity; European union; Feed-in tariff; Economics; Business; Treaty; International economics; International trade; Law; Energy policy; Market economy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.1738962244624373,"score_gpt":0.2777504323982687,"score_spread":0.10385420793583139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123846870","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071869494,0.53210115,0.00022849813,0.3346537,0.00046512845,0.0012423429,0.0053576394,0.00008943576,0.12514338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26736656,0.40876982,0.0009465064,0.30244237,0.0012327115,0.0012876906,0.0005677636,0.00019745695,0.017189141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873924,0.000010362564,0.0005532681,0.00036283536,0.000020983933,0.0003133061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906,0.00011179428,0.00024477896,0.00037081042,0.000014076519,0.00019858209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032911383,0.00018439669,0.0005876492,0.00008036701,0.00014249276,0.00004609047,0.00019270956,0.00004037207,0.000044288758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002724781,0.00020421766,0.0001050901,0.000170876,0.00005564563,0.00011887465,0.000040584713,0.00006421724,0.00003274155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010988752,0.00003080479,0.0012696314,0.0009393557,0.000048225666,5.3128014e-7,0.000057866182,0.000008879212,0.0000013449587,0.8605233,0.13225982,0.004849264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027940274,0.000026308806,0.00083595084,0.00020483758,0.000022223578,0.0000039461893,0.0000043953455,0.00005775324,0.00002226203,0.02447686,0.973831,0.00023508295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4150534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76121074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84157115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016014173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006378152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8327755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123850535","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000051","title":"<i>EC–Seal Products</i>: Seals and Sensibilities (TBT Aspects of the Panel and Appellate Body Reports)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Seal (emblem); European union; Interpretation (philosophy); International trade; Technical barriers to trade; Panel discussion; Product (mathematics); Business; Political science; Law; Advertising; Trade barrier; History","score_opus":0.050788058090425595,"score_gpt":0.2896381989919127,"score_spread":0.2388501409014871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123850535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029608859,0.41900864,0.0000017402159,0.43130526,0.0009385306,0.0035776151,0.000017507089,0.00022436182,0.11531747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649149,0.030977914,0.00010063918,0.0009793765,0.0001625521,0.0000061821056,0.0000024437595,0.000020594769,0.0028354058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979655,0.0004428788,0.00048711884,0.000362285,0.00048729812,0.00025492575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988664,0.00010580919,0.00030261985,0.0004367998,0.0001028506,0.00018554233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015897654,0.00015448213,0.00042092134,0.00004371891,0.00020062183,0.000052699383,0.00014524719,0.00003701381,0.000048112102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007326993,0.00011259473,0.000049978422,0.0010164257,0.0006354334,0.00017020915,0.000070332884,0.00014403912,0.0000049671667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010235434,0.0001710916,0.025646372,0.0074012047,0.00012460438,0.000067744506,0.010765792,0.0000028201055,0.00066972204,0.9037044,0.04338061,0.008055409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001429742,0.000013920017,0.0096389195,0.0015147335,0.00013322983,0.00006519778,0.00028692358,7.3993084e-7,0.00071006356,0.0022234882,0.98508024,0.00018954983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001722864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078959845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041741954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031931247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.459148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124062783","doi":"10.1017/s1474745609990048","title":"The special safeguard fiasco in the WTO: the perils of inadequate analysis and negotiation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguard; Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); Swift; Political science; Modalities; Work (physics); Law and economics; Agriculture; Fidelity; International trade; Business; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Social science; History; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.015159553823401147,"score_gpt":0.30230950483186964,"score_spread":0.28714995100846846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124062783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040580393,0.08635343,0.000033956618,0.87376624,0.0001906755,0.0014974925,0.0000054178863,0.00003238652,0.034062374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216373,0.0748764,0.000025345718,0.0027527735,0.00038063893,0.000009726641,0.0000036343538,0.0000049715295,0.0003092407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978286,0.00092811766,0.0004178603,0.00015912163,0.0004548981,0.00021138771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988977,0.0005266486,0.00020774166,0.00030563938,0.000025337902,0.000036960675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019621025,0.00010744002,0.00028829332,0.00008103404,0.00053050165,0.00010434077,0.00047815545,0.000025081747,0.00019349591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002822986,0.000052775322,0.00013344912,0.0040280777,0.0002850503,0.00012542607,0.000012965385,0.0001709515,0.000006472229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066845646,0.00007438374,0.0050667874,0.000102995196,0.00010305508,0.0000021939904,0.01089486,0.000014277127,0.000008181439,0.8200118,0.008176298,0.15553847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000860619,0.0000125989045,0.24025245,0.00017341792,0.00035051774,6.9985083e-7,0.0004572693,0.000008573549,0.000009361973,0.0011605043,0.75740385,0.00008470812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012585234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015625706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91757923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043398933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055004366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87195104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124634965","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000026","title":"‘The wide and the narrow gate’: Benchmarking in the SCM Agreement after the<i>Canada–Renewable Energy/FIT</i>Ruling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Subsidy; European court of justice; Status quo; Normalization (sociology); Ethos; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; European union; Economics; European Union law; Sociology; Marketing; International trade","score_opus":0.02206361008178235,"score_gpt":0.22026214017722456,"score_spread":0.19819853009544222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124634965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010517718,0.2722033,0.000028289325,0.49550483,0.0008722256,0.0012420531,0.000001822243,0.000027950384,0.22906776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.667421,0.006478874,0.00002525401,0.32322794,0.0007134308,0.00025594013,0.000011502016,0.0000141461605,0.0018519456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986673,0.00010121047,0.000371823,0.00016409793,0.00047573337,0.00021986332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992838,0.0002189303,0.00018360524,0.00025727964,0.000042577667,0.000013828301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017658746,0.00015356434,0.00017209226,0.0000343885,0.00033003246,0.00035746937,0.000429382,0.000011986679,0.000097898104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008604194,0.00006414868,0.00007130821,0.00037671145,0.00011816399,0.00027646043,0.0000724709,0.00014115663,0.000013729743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007070317,0.0000449469,0.0011871591,0.00044585537,0.000063114174,0.00001755868,0.00017061073,0.00026523706,0.0000017753521,0.51650816,0.47598654,0.005238325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033731133,0.0000021591757,0.00057349604,0.00058920326,0.00005524365,0.0000033809538,0.00007198765,0.0016765576,0.000002571433,0.0034614764,0.993129,0.00009757939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03609839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36301535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6663692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004983876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006078004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9703203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124860597","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000725","title":"<i>EC–Seal Products</i>: The Tension between Public Morals and International Trade Agreements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Seal (emblem); International trade; Free trade; Liberalization; Indigenous; Business; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.07550056071203612,"score_gpt":0.32890978556166695,"score_spread":0.2534092248496308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124860597","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005255024,0.022103474,0.000011539995,0.9692738,0.00036633812,0.0008495142,0.000022445902,0.00010672763,0.0067406795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93196285,0.059200402,0.00015890268,0.004502011,0.0007508486,0.000027795124,0.000015456379,0.00002530882,0.00335641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784744,0.00041563503,0.00041678982,0.0003762292,0.00059146946,0.0003524502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907106,0.00021325631,0.00019280521,0.00031432605,0.00003545047,0.00017307619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105818,0.00016878344,0.0002891894,0.00008451161,0.00042003213,0.00012337448,0.0005534448,0.000037900194,0.00059897534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045951392,0.00009643629,0.00006718762,0.0010103903,0.00043531903,0.0004899049,0.00007371011,0.0001316417,0.000067475085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038413,0.00012822732,0.046813335,0.00047233902,0.00018161068,0.000006808903,0.0008122374,4.2462155e-8,0.0006561663,0.49419206,0.1563979,0.3003354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019906805,0.000006733522,0.037917797,0.00076480216,0.000065391694,0.0000026319688,0.000019990888,1.361201e-7,0.00006605618,0.00026584457,0.9605489,0.00014265942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019984594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022583248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96477175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009183169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011674981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.655836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125641524","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000342","title":"First Diagnose, Then Treat: What Ails the Doha Round?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; International trade; Blame; Commodity; International economics; China; Corporate governance; World trade; Economics; Political science; Business; Market economy; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.157992342439702,"score_gpt":0.25044350504150825,"score_spread":0.09245116260180625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125641524","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014137486,0.852329,0.000024700306,0.061600123,0.00081440277,0.00067205675,0.00005702263,0.000061779996,0.08302717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18862817,0.796217,0.0001512008,0.012051388,0.00036836087,0.00016292592,0.000026201285,0.000046792185,0.0023479674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982575,0.000031366104,0.00080310216,0.00044073828,0.000046324865,0.00042092486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857455,0.00013120456,0.00032584544,0.00074856234,0.000010285144,0.00020953112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000853542,0.00025934583,0.0007317032,0.00008295936,0.00013265971,0.00029991998,0.00059105473,0.00005819972,0.00048728343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009227739,0.00020770184,0.00030820587,0.00043912476,0.00007541679,0.000738,0.000060841852,0.00021146149,0.0037517166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015321348,0.0002713886,0.012811916,0.0011701719,0.0001966988,0.000028284978,0.0007506351,0.00008568186,8.646482e-8,0.6393357,0.31533158,0.030002555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032128554,0.000033103475,0.00332869,0.0006858852,0.000036280893,0.00001938989,0.00006307695,0.00005750637,0.0000011661438,0.015031106,0.98015106,0.0002714515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014362943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029793027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6648195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018154959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025429352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169262379","doi":"10.1017/s1474745621000112","title":"Fishy SPS Measures? The WTO's <i>Korea – Radionuclides</i> Dispute","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Panel data; Power (physics); Law; International trade; Political science; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.030696062913024416,"score_gpt":0.2994102962882449,"score_spread":0.2687142333752205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169262379","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003747242,0.22380123,0.00007781021,0.6434243,0.00076223136,0.0007650638,0.000013869835,0.00024083775,0.13087723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3780548,0.52180296,0.00085150846,0.06671097,0.0024051843,0.00012175998,0.000080902646,0.00013493834,0.029836962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968651,0.0009977922,0.0004894632,0.00041270978,0.00076706655,0.00046787583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849707,0.00035131822,0.00017640434,0.0006554485,0.00008920013,0.00023056456],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011627969,0.00022302243,0.00045895606,0.0000455257,0.000812905,0.00019356639,0.0006417492,0.0000535104,0.002652657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045896825,0.00016465606,0.00027539808,0.0026333826,0.00033532482,0.0002588358,0.000061262755,0.0003335241,0.0002648115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018888118,0.00011526879,0.0009883761,0.0005033576,0.00009183224,0.000063453925,0.00090029003,0.000002710206,0.00006193272,0.55929625,0.39477426,0.043200385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012238073,0.0000030944161,0.0021067047,0.00097602885,0.00015518218,0.00001566359,0.000055358898,8.830673e-7,0.00017633592,0.0003344255,0.99584347,0.00021046374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068191766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036405267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6010692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012802811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030121676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186875561","doi":"10.1017/s1474745621000240","title":"‘Two Roads Diverged in [Soft]wood’ Targeted Dumping, Differential Pricing Methodology, and Zeroing: <i>US – Canada Anti-Dumping in Softwood Lumber</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Subsidy; Appeal; Differential (mechanical device); Dumping; Economics; International trade; Law; Political science; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Market economy","score_opus":0.07497975567652673,"score_gpt":0.2517673223188151,"score_spread":0.17678756664228837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186875561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52274144,0.4665021,0.00031315756,0.004997554,0.0010463456,0.0005770957,0.00009159784,0.000044927558,0.0036857673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030633,0.09240017,0.0014942401,0.0027460803,0.00008029137,0.000020263957,0.000053647098,0.000036197012,0.00010580329],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970607,0.00015521534,0.0012676291,0.0007978774,0.000052642823,0.0006659249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889046,0.00016518625,0.0003969881,0.00037535361,0.000011161231,0.00016082963],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008606672,0.00032271098,0.0014887496,0.00018526695,0.00010370548,0.000065941014,0.0002622783,0.00008833865,0.00037441295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024130142,0.00041358633,0.0001606351,0.00073379034,0.00004908711,0.0002004046,0.00014628087,0.00046493678,0.000022819702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013520279,0.00024160648,0.967092,0.003163598,0.000208865,0.00031903066,0.0003521833,0.0003709241,0.00018203515,0.013195412,0.002883131,0.011977737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035138968,0.000036996964,0.81822276,0.004255779,0.00011021261,0.00011330779,0.00009656288,0.0018805459,0.00024007121,0.004103633,0.16580786,0.0016183612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08984253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5249586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43511608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002732761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014943122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192412830","doi":"10.1017/s1474745621000239","title":"Labour Rights Protection and Its Enforcement under the USMCA: Insights from a Comparative Legal Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Economics; Business; International economics; Law","score_opus":0.06255573799402164,"score_gpt":0.3461306657811071,"score_spread":0.2835749277870855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192412830","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10318635,0.495594,0.00065984775,0.09820879,0.00089772535,0.0031255733,0.00011093533,0.00015879648,0.298058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808573,0.010429955,0.000028651124,0.001994119,0.00013629433,0.00005927648,0.00002429623,0.000002912901,0.006467205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874926,0.00036418898,0.00020886153,0.00019731301,0.0003573132,0.00012305682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959826,0.000079393634,0.000084814965,0.00010485465,0.00007619949,0.000056491474],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017501316,0.00009365857,0.0002522167,0.00004634501,0.0004600018,0.00009235,0.000112084344,0.000021829966,0.0010426856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011494476,0.000060229366,0.00011310318,0.0009769596,0.000058057183,0.00016572718,0.000020891173,0.00011683027,0.00002722481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003010756,0.000027976364,0.000020471678,0.000031336436,0.0003625521,0.0000035373032,0.0008293607,0.0000143908765,0.000018908508,0.998309,0.0002159443,0.00016346619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000908904,0.000007904913,0.0025747996,0.00028039483,0.00043188248,4.554784e-7,0.00015989851,0.000060900486,0.00017437598,0.0031918755,0.9929318,0.00009484009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045194076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09317113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007732614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006765186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220889505","doi":"10.1017/s1474745622000076","title":"Counterfactuals and Contingency in WTO Dispute Settlement History","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Dispute resolution; Settlement (finance); Scholarship; Law and economics; Hindsight bias; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.028681640633259464,"score_gpt":0.29039548141271654,"score_spread":0.2617138407794571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220889505","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001439056,0.7350143,0.000008511324,0.19192904,0.000965737,0.001828698,0.00004742923,0.00016256295,0.06860466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86684316,0.115150794,0.00014124169,0.010324905,0.00011457586,0.0001728121,0.00002655006,0.000034292367,0.0071916417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982518,0.00046436783,0.0003633892,0.0002545019,0.0004071106,0.00025885075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951196,0.00009514931,0.00012896575,0.00016023019,0.000010560989,0.000093118986],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011280031,0.00011010282,0.0002807355,0.000101265,0.0002609728,0.000016742384,0.00022774654,0.00001243679,0.009251943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006801058,0.00012097375,0.000044000375,0.0006509064,0.000119472505,0.00015151677,0.00007036711,0.00019564044,0.000020456326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006074508,0.00027420113,0.019007957,0.0013586668,0.000043523072,0.000043786073,0.013015018,0.000005886198,0.000047354166,0.65546006,0.28385973,0.026877776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014805727,0.000008641176,0.005388242,0.00027743945,0.000026367437,0.0000016515594,0.00016907795,0.0000014906019,0.0000017019587,0.00006257594,0.9937794,0.00013531695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017194345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020362968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8654041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057309034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001561635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99165374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239713843","doi":"10.1017/s1474745603001137","title":"Canada – Dairy: Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Subsidy; International trade; World trade; Business; Agreement on Agriculture; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; International economics; Agricultural science; Economics; Geography; Market economy; Biology","score_opus":0.041689024061595914,"score_gpt":0.20293163768157707,"score_spread":0.16124261361998116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239713843","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18786763,0.7719961,0.000019479989,0.021033196,0.0008662382,0.0017544827,0.00018373644,0.000009842057,0.01626929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775256,0.02138119,0.00006300202,0.0009094831,0.000020519758,0.000017572576,0.000008848325,0.00000905026,0.00006472936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988214,0.000053954234,0.0007348488,0.00019068358,0.000054123146,0.00014498661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988633,0.00013281773,0.0006839387,0.00026694013,0.000020188414,0.000032863165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010300779,0.00010998935,0.0004567583,0.000027373968,0.00007331868,0.000009573631,0.00012952102,0.000015349442,0.000020609743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031555007,0.00007988933,0.00005420117,0.00029011167,0.000056369478,0.00006683547,0.0000066337957,0.00009123603,5.274831e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031511365,0.0000670945,0.1034577,0.0068319286,0.0004186657,0.000005524612,0.000774599,0.00027945664,0.000023206456,0.81091475,0.0662253,0.010970291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009378737,0.000019672721,0.112110056,0.00072111806,0.00012274711,0.000014984121,0.00028445682,0.00005986692,0.00065103936,0.0033447635,0.8814102,0.00032324917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8210211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97308123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008304738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003848539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32577923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296058460","doi":"10.1017/s1474745622000313","title":"Energy in International Trade Law: Concepts, Regulation and Changing Markets by Anna-Alexandra Marhold Cambridge University Press, 2021: 9781108551526","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; Economics; Political science; Law and economics; International trade","score_opus":0.012737254959595587,"score_gpt":0.2505463824551511,"score_spread":0.2378091274955555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296058460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00094302587,0.23405823,0.00012260755,0.4246343,0.001469475,0.0019260959,0.00052229915,0.00031014264,0.33601382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91066015,0.064762115,0.00007726032,0.0024932877,0.0001521824,0.000019242218,0.00019368129,0.000027208525,0.021614878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978021,0.00072097126,0.00029383585,0.00037142076,0.00049149006,0.00032019342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994121,0.00011855586,0.00017119083,0.00016786094,0.000010471366,0.0001197904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007260173,0.0001557674,0.0002858571,0.00015697576,0.00055978156,0.000056472087,0.0003537887,0.00003599574,0.0012246446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029402863,0.00019362167,0.00006755422,0.0012647865,0.00020521122,0.00041699305,0.0001260479,0.00020486447,0.0000015071371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015198113,0.000081019134,0.00056274753,0.00013838238,0.000030796193,0.000024652772,0.0006114893,0.000008277479,0.00004068594,0.8907865,0.098902196,0.008798028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034962466,0.000006555547,0.0024658327,0.00026739974,0.000034801425,0.000005311826,0.0002501847,0.000060267463,0.000023297034,0.000016968885,0.99631983,0.00019991501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006598213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064365537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90971714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035164517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007155376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306155942","doi":"10.1017/s1474745622000325","title":"‘An Introduction to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: Understanding the New NAFTA’ by David Gantz Edward Elgar Publishing: 2020, ISBN 9781839105319","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Relations in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Political science; Regional science; Economic history; Economic geography; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.029818662607234078,"score_gpt":0.3085265642226627,"score_spread":0.27870790161542863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306155942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052125644,0.015465763,0.002639345,0.95978916,0.0016257492,0.0011778591,0.000076445016,0.00006565068,0.019107902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5620335,0.08543499,0.0017798222,0.2533846,0.008227394,0.00088761305,0.0031246885,0.0002170245,0.08491044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961647,0.00111743,0.0004602503,0.00036240075,0.0015078441,0.00038739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985348,0.00044539056,0.00028373505,0.0004929824,0.0000601073,0.00018298386],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024130037,0.00016789895,0.00021664884,0.0001097172,0.0019652294,0.00038676796,0.0012481627,0.000020706588,0.004650395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006744942,0.00012073409,0.00008820247,0.0032636686,0.00012718745,0.00043703243,0.0001172502,0.0006047432,0.000026413918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046097184,0.000023360311,0.000038546314,0.000020504422,0.00004058016,0.0000014981316,0.001791055,0.001708179,0.0000024566955,0.09311034,0.89682394,0.006434952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078823425,0.000026152033,0.00004559968,0.0001041907,0.000059229864,0.0000041756603,0.002943102,0.0002589181,0.0000017648632,0.0012633502,0.99505955,0.0001551656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090258345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12775142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70640457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021184406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068964437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386441394","doi":"10.1017/s1474745623000058","title":"The Economic Interest Test in UK Trade Remedy Investigations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Test (biology); European union; Economic integration; International economics; Stakeholder; Trade barrier; Trade union; Single market; Business; Economics; World trade; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21627981031233132,"score_gpt":0.27157884704308366,"score_spread":0.05529903673075234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386441394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029217819,0.10652842,0.000007005595,0.574602,0.003406181,0.004606575,0.000020992455,0.0009756378,0.28063536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94828975,0.033505213,0.000011848263,0.014303329,0.0006580145,0.00013376948,0.00006664377,0.000039265895,0.0029921406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899685,0.0000249365,0.00041818435,0.00020253217,0.00008211431,0.0002753797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938136,0.0002495424,0.00010974847,0.00024033172,0.0000046353352,0.000014363031],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059153314,0.00014405872,0.00021789364,0.00017285167,0.00020894597,0.00014649576,0.00034510018,0.000024072233,0.00032512104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000357719,0.0000960394,0.00009604306,0.0009851756,0.00007359401,0.0002468508,0.000069047834,0.00022220568,0.003683211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009177037,0.000052735828,0.009946722,0.0026983342,0.00004001718,0.00002572459,0.000085230065,0.00003373918,0.000068125024,0.040648848,0.8714169,0.07497444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115740535,0.0000036628492,0.0069028465,0.0022456478,0.00003117246,0.0000015756476,0.000017256405,0.0012729046,0.000011271729,0.0015946488,0.9876572,0.00014608564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112511625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003540059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.919072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005153553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002865032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99709255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386442022","doi":"10.1017/s1474745623000034","title":"North–South Trade-Related Technology Diffusion and the East Asia–Latin America Productivity Gap","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Universidad de Chile; Nankai University","keywords":"Total factor productivity; Latin Americans; East Asia; Productivity; Economics; Corporate governance; International trade; Geography; Development economics; Economic geography; International economics; China; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.03617283589381554,"score_gpt":0.21586617260282465,"score_spread":0.1796933367090091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386442022","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22853304,0.38047576,0.0000660444,0.3634191,0.0009548456,0.003245101,0.00022104813,0.0006394769,0.022445597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95647234,0.04162827,0.000067819376,0.0005266284,0.00010889516,0.00013598491,0.000027537331,0.000035808564,0.0009967413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979042,0.0000949703,0.0007885714,0.0007616713,0.000039677725,0.00041094533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985946,0.00009628883,0.0005117963,0.00070097443,0.000006071438,0.00009025879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010882101,0.00025832388,0.00096734724,0.00034610313,0.00022874409,0.000036474765,0.00029658835,0.00007300951,0.00013204051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035430276,0.00021426115,0.00018668713,0.0021937185,0.00040570673,0.00014918725,0.000112497095,0.0004811982,0.0005367337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000687151,0.00024855742,0.2598354,0.0031753248,0.00031799296,0.000016848748,0.0016921122,0.00001825317,0.000014340755,0.37038288,0.010214966,0.35401464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014176519,0.00005344471,0.24031295,0.00049913564,0.000087281835,0.0000317398,0.00006222141,0.00064873265,0.000010536197,0.030587176,0.7256473,0.0006418677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022879583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059656806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72793925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041977222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018094079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8737316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386461203","doi":"10.1017/s1474745623000071","title":"Is Using Trade Policy for Foreign Policy a ‘SNO Job’? On Linkage, Friend-Shoring, and the Challenges for Multilateralism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Framing (construction); Commercial policy; Foreign policy; International trade; Sanctions; Psychological intervention; Economic sanctions; Economics; Trade barrier; Linkage (software); Shoring; Intervention (counseling); International economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2337068245928345,"score_gpt":0.3334370736054888,"score_spread":0.09973024901265429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386461203","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062746247,0.52218515,0.00027958685,0.41690248,0.00075672765,0.007463614,0.0022875017,0.00027890608,0.043571435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38644537,0.59035325,0.0012314033,0.018618854,0.0015212315,0.0007417111,0.000038895167,0.00013031688,0.0009189712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978799,0.000024647903,0.0008429365,0.0005896939,0.000035944817,0.00062687806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998809,0.0002537218,0.00033606275,0.00045619567,0.0000074387453,0.0001376203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009180574,0.0003147153,0.0009582419,0.0004078243,0.00024969765,0.00009069365,0.0003267976,0.000098838645,0.00001933916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017478973,0.00027483297,0.000503841,0.0005152983,0.000097528806,0.00015847344,0.00004713784,0.00016448245,0.000055273944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027074473,0.0000241562,0.00013585515,0.001908705,0.000100865785,8.5200287e-7,0.0004809413,0.000020017042,6.0198425e-7,0.98212403,0.0040921164,0.011084801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018571644,0.00006484415,0.0021356617,0.000842812,0.00005514352,0.000008183294,0.000041814346,0.003631987,0.000010357146,0.11916024,0.8718245,0.0003672898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009766542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028600642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8677324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001286352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036843434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390543696","doi":"10.1017/s1474745623000459","title":"Small State Diplomacy in Action: The Real Origins of TPP","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; Diplomacy; Surprise; General partnership; China; State (computer science); Political science; Economy; International trade; Action (physics); Economics; Geography; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1692826626290747,"score_gpt":0.2917000412685183,"score_spread":0.12241737863944357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390543696","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04705966,0.77327454,0.00006200569,0.018938068,0.0010495741,0.0008803446,0.00024235858,0.000100721285,0.15839274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48517385,0.51297957,0.0000982281,0.000724569,0.00008941822,0.000034763736,0.00000895637,0.000021534372,0.0008691288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870193,0.000018919443,0.00076019205,0.00028065918,0.000019883244,0.00021842557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999431,0.00006907797,0.00014741131,0.0003036331,0.0000031968775,0.000045666457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050061266,0.00013166088,0.00046931888,0.00013757918,0.00002690606,0.000042388383,0.0002377853,0.000025522291,0.00026410184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013621029,0.00011241508,0.00019209992,0.0006278676,0.00004081356,0.0001353621,0.00002419436,0.00020635438,0.0004518979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003247425,0.00004956873,0.0067655793,0.0022352997,0.000056774843,0.000010254381,0.00008711783,0.000024889821,0.0000017395874,0.97277546,0.0024065608,0.015583485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100398924,0.000015245248,0.012262998,0.000977681,0.000015152432,0.0000054106786,0.0000052790087,0.00016020946,0.0000101032565,0.019527903,0.96678656,0.0001330733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024680892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051657093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96437997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019171344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027184335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58083844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402841806","doi":"10.1017/s1474745624000259","title":"Anu Bradford, <i>Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology</i> Oxford University Press, 2023, 599 pages","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Political science; Media studies; Engineering; History; Sociology; Ancient history","score_opus":0.021096656767276525,"score_gpt":0.29081763211773376,"score_spread":0.26972097535045725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402841806","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006188585,0.4923634,0.000015879365,0.25665078,0.00063951337,0.0008676637,0.00019719594,0.0004881259,0.2481586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22621778,0.7335916,0.000103866245,0.0028720736,0.0004947651,0.000034858567,0.000017941478,0.000028714992,0.03663842],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986228,0.000113142254,0.00019881027,0.0003585615,0.00031092903,0.00039577208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993551,0.00015932754,0.000044148583,0.00030358063,0.000025554358,0.0001122896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000376849,0.00017496216,0.00030091396,0.000053903383,0.0005854934,0.00017227615,0.0005076275,0.00006302886,0.00008034564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014545872,0.00013339621,0.00020648628,0.0021823728,0.00046875328,0.00030149135,0.00019521802,0.00022540907,0.00007462359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062500294,0.00004302032,0.0005345426,0.00071002543,0.00014681637,0.00008155668,0.0013805428,8.371135e-7,3.5523138e-7,0.34975216,0.4157664,0.23157753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004646735,0.000013740138,0.00032806813,0.0017581689,0.000106368876,0.0000056641097,0.00091912696,7.580409e-7,0.0000016195207,0.0021512446,0.9945003,0.00016848947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017806386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055497303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5787339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016609684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001194802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.543974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402862748","doi":"10.1017/s1474745624000053","title":"The Rapid Response Labor Mechanism of the US–Mexico–Canada Agreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Agreement; Economics; Political science; Business; Physics; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.032381592413172115,"score_gpt":0.3147802980484082,"score_spread":0.28239870563523606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402862748","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005920397,0.7100406,0.0000031491745,0.272417,0.0012544509,0.0006735218,0.00003119571,0.00003052162,0.014957517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26197362,0.7091629,0.000024155628,0.008078081,0.0001779412,0.00010500518,8.5422954e-7,0.000016262135,0.020461211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978144,0.00081779185,0.0003098202,0.00018770435,0.0005867529,0.00028354002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989572,0.0005360635,0.00008672335,0.00032927975,0.000031670566,0.000059065096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020527963,0.00012048539,0.00022934131,0.000020405696,0.00067189906,0.000042906777,0.00045451653,0.000017449207,0.0002082219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020228323,0.00006269954,0.00014477012,0.0009096329,0.00017010192,0.0000397533,0.00006498105,0.0001367175,0.00001143761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013238399,0.000031573505,0.00024179599,0.0011753521,0.000244955,0.0000103943175,0.0042457585,4.3840774e-7,0.000032908167,0.6661521,0.2712317,0.05661974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003849872,0.000011306632,0.001997988,0.0014696416,0.000085264255,3.9143092e-7,0.00046702413,7.936929e-7,0.00007640427,0.0012776704,0.9944944,0.00008064614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014995449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5315822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72326267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013778567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078863837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413226624","doi":"10.1017/s1474745625100992","title":"Recalibration, Shielding and Containment: How the World Trading System De-risks from China and the United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"China; Multilateralism; International trade; Trade war; Economics; Rest (music); Corporate governance; Coercion (linguistics); Global governance; Business; International economics; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02489813412309797,"score_gpt":0.29433882443896986,"score_spread":0.26944069031587187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413226624","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057551134,0.18514939,0.00054665515,0.7946168,0.0002500891,0.0018139777,0.00001589686,0.00019684275,0.0116552105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400338,0.053839196,0.00014842939,0.00437785,0.00010846311,0.000052176485,0.000019015415,0.000015358153,0.0014057403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771345,0.0012378488,0.0003171193,0.00025277594,0.00022970479,0.00024907914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982046,0.0012969981,0.0001620308,0.00022998353,0.000018509954,0.00008790761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001597064,0.00016179666,0.00035153623,0.0001145205,0.0010790467,0.00043135762,0.00029489677,0.000033243916,0.00007516254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020387344,0.00009956156,0.000057850168,0.0020991557,0.00048753456,0.0001930721,0.000041337895,0.00024672557,0.0000011977457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008137502,0.000009283912,0.0035570287,0.000513243,0.00008075833,0.000002068347,0.004744815,0.0000035226703,0.0000045876905,0.9807252,0.0061857365,0.0041655856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007000728,0.0000042609636,0.012466972,0.005175341,0.00041989054,0.0000023474083,0.0027229353,0.0008093095,0.00003813092,0.002584245,0.97487617,0.00020034701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011777661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038160153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112588874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007024857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82992643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413226654","doi":"10.1017/s1474745625101055","title":"How the US Reciprocal Tariff Plan May Save the Global Trading System","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Tariff; Negotiation; Quarter (Canadian coin); International trade; Economics; Plan (archaeology); World trade; International economics; Business; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.07476733828439507,"score_gpt":0.2345835614078468,"score_spread":0.15981622312345173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413226654","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021248048,0.5439295,0.00037799883,0.16178484,0.0019077674,0.0014505311,0.00030391288,0.0001259505,0.28799468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581591,0.031071825,0.000118972,0.0085697975,0.00022283534,0.00011683684,0.000016365495,0.000019167119,0.0017051251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822706,0.000060422757,0.0007617992,0.0004649663,0.000043726883,0.00044201713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878126,0.00010933147,0.0003259391,0.0006948829,0.000007029826,0.00008152897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008734192,0.00026580505,0.0007357487,0.000062719446,0.00029859287,0.0002657149,0.00080610125,0.000075806674,0.000062432984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058763482,0.00018333632,0.00038535794,0.0007849384,0.00009760237,0.00015240758,0.00006305242,0.00032476374,0.00022156557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004567052,0.00002045855,0.009289865,0.0010205794,0.000121036726,0.0000043823234,0.000025618418,0.000006914899,9.484701e-8,0.96106726,0.022875667,0.005563557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020167688,0.000011339785,0.008450924,0.0011753934,0.000072159426,0.000030213714,0.00005983705,0.0004026741,0.000001985794,0.0054517677,0.9839336,0.00020838986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009135887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020288567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96105796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042521977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037030688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7476238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413253568","doi":"10.1017/s1474745625101031","title":"Introduction: Tariff Turbulence: The New US Trade Policy and its Impact on the Global Trading System","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Commercial policy; Free trade; International economics; Liberalization; Industrialisation; Administration (probate law); Revenue; Economics; World trade; International trade; Trade barrier; Business; Market economy; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.03623269576539752,"score_gpt":0.2658322098083138,"score_spread":0.2295995140429163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413253568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051389714,0.4400066,0.00002857274,0.48155263,0.0009283949,0.0010412256,0.00016130174,0.00007668856,0.0710656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200934,0.06523909,0.000025829815,0.012565098,0.001255549,0.000040452247,0.000007347171,0.00001759939,0.0007556037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982443,0.00005709734,0.00074962515,0.0004941243,0.00004460973,0.00041026715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989311,0.00011504861,0.00027497864,0.0005413534,0.0000043138693,0.00013318428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006978138,0.00029585077,0.00068278424,0.00011157423,0.00026512894,0.00016325213,0.0004844183,0.00006751103,0.00019553593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001145146,0.00019335096,0.00031048968,0.0011438109,0.0000583894,0.00015893848,0.000038534992,0.0003160604,0.00017457684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073215133,0.000020145433,0.0007467152,0.0005286072,0.00011759619,0.0000013634819,0.00003556432,0.000039017934,2.4492425e-7,0.8974023,0.0973543,0.0037468316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024314546,0.000033614022,0.013885869,0.0009838871,0.000065915716,0.00004677532,0.0000255838,0.00070396974,0.0000053860167,0.008535552,0.97523713,0.00023317397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012334545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032230284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9149545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006117769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098331424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78846234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414614648","doi":"10.1017/s1474745625101079","title":"On the Feasibility, by Means of Customs Duties, of an Entirely (or Almost Entirely) Made-in-the-USA Automobile","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Automotive industry; Tariff; Production (economics); Workforce; Order (exchange); Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law)","score_opus":0.025473606062265088,"score_gpt":0.2786523080997953,"score_spread":0.25317870203753023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414614648","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09987488,0.7393591,0.002418911,0.011985524,0.004765995,0.019628648,0.00057893584,0.0015891155,0.11979893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111557,0.007022546,0.0001504672,0.0003052612,0.000024414074,0.0002312614,0.000017122578,0.00004459267,0.0010887812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800885,0.00021216103,0.00092279946,0.00025965,0.00030217273,0.00029438562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826944,0.0005235476,0.00011457875,0.0010319228,0.000016586751,0.000043910775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010263729,0.0002873633,0.0006922958,0.00014808362,0.000033335047,0.000015231322,0.00075922813,0.000064105916,0.0002573262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008641364,0.00018552343,0.00021176337,0.0011978756,0.00007925622,0.000075707,0.000032473952,0.00034047244,0.000018635701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015017328,0.0032446366,0.0070079784,0.19482686,0.0018882258,0.000094748764,0.0036627518,0.036766488,0.0065369983,0.29999915,0.26825917,0.17756285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008107056,0.00016985714,0.008845569,0.025123991,0.000331567,0.00002481015,0.000086915206,0.006654666,0.0037504775,0.00025476803,0.95331025,0.00063641253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049122697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016644094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89124066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014502447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054168584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75654256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}