{"meta":{"query_hash":"a2d656b69581","filters":{"venue":"World Trade Review"},"cohort_total":86,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":86,"exported":86,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a2d656b69581","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=World+Trade+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1544206638","doi":"","title":"Canada Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Business; Milk products; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Commerce; Food science; Economics; Environmental science; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02052028786518846,"score_gpt":0.21216359978885885,"score_spread":0.1916433119236704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544206638","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11718509,0.5698876,0.0014107386,0.042025723,0.0028495707,0.0002765301,0.012658482,0.00017960039,0.25352675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60247177,0.3459526,0.0018948539,0.009143724,0.0006201759,0.000083848245,0.0041074245,0.00004203588,0.035683516],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632394,0.00028177432,0.00019168395,0.00017206444,0.002451668,0.00057881715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932075,0.0008884457,0.0007389437,0.000105644525,0.004701267,0.00035817834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002303046,0.00046249948,0.00045410573,0.0049028066,0.0015280647,0.0030741026,0.0009729596,0.0016709825,0.0025271622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068610837,0.00025670743,0.0005422118,0.010479139,0.0013106545,0.000634383,0.0005104126,0.001073918,0.00018441441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001379755,0.00029469866,0.07276303,0.01616818,0.0016285342,0.0010664702,0.0014766157,0.017207244,0.007930081,0.26090214,0.30734447,0.3118388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020979595,0.00018728312,0.2779594,0.0025661727,0.001161879,0.00026558558,0.0009708854,0.0012120892,0.0046167546,0.005861205,0.7048562,0.00013267854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9542878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9704987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045712173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034506842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10582579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25036585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564572718","doi":"10.1017/s147474560300140x","title":"International regime conflict in trade and environment: the Biosafety Protocol and the WTO","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Biosafety; Precautionary principle; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); International trade; Obligation; Agriculture; Business; Sustainable development; Political science; Biotechnology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.023498508059637536,"score_gpt":0.2996886472987039,"score_spread":0.2761901392390664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564572718","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007307082,0.497839,0.0037134634,0.23727877,0.0050312346,0.000067508074,0.00014447463,0.000035360557,0.2485831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26204982,0.36764744,0.0047140005,0.2849531,0.008850679,0.00042471426,0.00035629052,0.00009945411,0.07090451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99082726,0.0036688761,0.000403791,0.00059670914,0.0037411363,0.0007622345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286073,0.004560906,0.0007832366,0.00023505322,0.0013777288,0.00018225415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011137069,0.0005660518,0.0005383003,0.0022799573,0.0027380162,0.007017432,0.0015733024,0.013367136,0.0030138975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0157305,0.00027971796,0.00074146065,0.0051957746,0.006458238,0.0076358262,0.0018910067,0.006846899,0.0006995725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035137735,0.000026748845,0.00038677818,0.00038064178,0.000020469894,0.00024830503,0.0008553894,0.00039653457,0.00014532731,0.8463767,0.10746006,0.04366789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022598586,0.000036556274,0.0018007184,0.0017965221,0.000022007593,0.0002005666,0.00094794366,0.00022128955,0.00016586456,0.127066,0.8676907,0.000029231276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023369877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018707227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023369877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069903876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014657153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058899164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893122135","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605002454","title":"United States-Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Subsidy; Dumping; International trade; Legislation; Business; Consistency (knowledge bases); International economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.022037399131158132,"score_gpt":0.30141338390994465,"score_spread":0.2793759847787865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893122135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025042212,0.010738304,0.0035628302,0.018464131,0.0019583453,0.00087473675,0.01374902,0.00054074405,0.9250697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2260504,0.012898345,0.01534277,0.09880023,0.0006790694,0.0029154306,0.012949784,0.00016478694,0.63019925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973713,0.0003336026,0.00019027111,0.00027083783,0.0013855562,0.00044836846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843127,0.000332288,0.00016231563,0.00014262366,0.0008538612,0.00007755815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028318092,0.00080693245,0.00046438057,0.0017247684,0.0018900423,0.0038473161,0.0011829975,0.0066314344,0.005697797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005745709,0.0005029236,0.0005115277,0.0019889285,0.0006723413,0.0010409098,0.0010608303,0.0027650492,0.0038444535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028011005,0.00030750182,0.0047489414,0.0002996028,0.000035616515,0.00082818035,0.0006938188,0.0008547499,0.00339117,0.29922834,0.64133835,0.047993585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004474497,0.00005699597,0.0056290603,0.0002773631,0.000027824546,0.00015511946,0.0000986115,0.0002465284,0.00080616795,0.00424216,0.98838705,0.000028344992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112909056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10371653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112909056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010524994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2245037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915722993","doi":"10.1017/s1474745603001393","title":"Regulatory transparency, developing countries and the WTO","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Developing country; Globalization; Business; Corporate governance; Democracy; Independence (probability theory); International trade; Adaptation (eye); International economics; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Law; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.022041795250402303,"score_gpt":0.285603240487127,"score_spread":0.2635614452367247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915722993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012156361,0.1706028,0.01716585,0.25206938,0.003098579,0.00009520444,0.00022976733,0.00014362506,0.5444385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6876317,0.13902406,0.009624174,0.101964414,0.0059699696,0.0003561238,0.00028161827,0.0001907379,0.054957215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97733307,0.011430965,0.0010888301,0.0016092639,0.007148595,0.0013891833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722554,0.017717967,0.0046225768,0.0016060742,0.0031348213,0.0006631738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020377813,0.0004845206,0.00058901595,0.0026451803,0.0035562161,0.01087633,0.00097397144,0.006968308,0.003902908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030170757,0.00035363255,0.00045763885,0.0049859565,0.016212361,0.008164041,0.003638302,0.009945223,0.0006360109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013344979,0.000009873077,0.00023493728,0.00012550128,0.00000786667,0.00007100635,0.0006892378,0.00037186252,0.000074413794,0.9715623,0.014213009,0.01262672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017232847,0.000018053946,0.0009514814,0.0010168216,0.000016315655,0.0001681827,0.0008724197,0.00033450904,0.00028691135,0.549184,0.44710916,0.000024841822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011066189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052108406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020377813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006422164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011890105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10776949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974077603","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605002624","title":"Multilateralism compromised: the mysterious origins of GATT Article XXIV","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Charter; Treaty; Political science; International trade; Free trade; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.016886277371353377,"score_gpt":0.292756967364547,"score_spread":0.2758706899931936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974077603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07156776,0.022733238,0.0054915985,0.41967672,0.0012127397,0.000031753738,0.00011712377,0.00009803702,0.479071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93822134,0.005436013,0.0007499888,0.030406456,0.0005378292,0.000025834444,0.000031539184,0.000059856156,0.024530964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948726,0.0021384112,0.00012577577,0.00060854026,0.0013490625,0.000905551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964658,0.0020366777,0.00039942111,0.00025393133,0.00065525295,0.00018900326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069580837,0.00016435306,0.00025172046,0.0009126037,0.004353901,0.011923148,0.00076116266,0.004054527,0.0028536087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010270909,0.00020746488,0.00025692975,0.00097556744,0.011676979,0.00458562,0.002431025,0.0070913,0.0003531565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001183018,0.00000565518,0.00043534292,0.000021018539,0.0000060789666,0.00014511119,0.0026887686,0.00014414721,0.0001420034,0.96987647,0.016625876,0.0098976735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016709791,0.000022710516,0.0023911397,0.0003003741,0.000016485454,0.00016794329,0.004987319,0.0005683331,0.00081689004,0.47086447,0.5198188,0.000028858854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045210313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039115578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045210313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010688583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009039356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089894295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984749704","doi":"10.1017/s1474745601001033","title":"Cross-agreement complaints before the Appellate Body: a case study of the <i>EC–Asbestos</i> dispute","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Political science; Agreement; Asbestos; International trade; Law; International trade law; World trade; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038978772079361144,"score_gpt":0.32120652207980926,"score_spread":0.28222775000044814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984749704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76336235,0.0020689545,0.005571089,0.029230911,0.0001921605,0.00027350715,0.00014887865,0.000041629817,0.19911045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798576,0.00075414445,0.001501618,0.0047687492,0.00008005208,0.00011288613,0.00005236862,0.00002493995,0.012847633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97606796,0.013338378,0.00092516554,0.0014390254,0.0043429015,0.0038866568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532974,0.037823845,0.0032961883,0.0012085707,0.0031797446,0.0011943014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018591257,0.00044856736,0.00073764264,0.0020106817,0.032244623,0.010274313,0.0029483188,0.023258742,0.006756846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031210525,0.0007087718,0.0010310094,0.0039228033,0.010037722,0.0064341323,0.0060158237,0.010373002,0.001061031],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045538135,0.0015409497,0.03469244,0.00047762442,0.00011364619,0.10393027,0.3291331,0.004446893,0.0037083535,0.44979912,0.037065167,0.034637008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003576772,0.00085869426,0.037451603,0.0010689722,0.00029158703,0.022625819,0.56953734,0.009309223,0.006029265,0.037810463,0.3143032,0.00035619424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084390536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10487608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084390536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011526618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007951309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16779864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993517717","doi":"10.1017/s1474745604001600","title":"Changing the terms of trade policy making: from the ‘club’ to the ‘multistakeholder’ model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Club; Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Openness to experience; Commercial policy; Economics; Ambiguity; Political science; International trade; International economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06120985283662886,"score_gpt":0.33958019018263247,"score_spread":0.2783703373460036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993517717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039028443,0.010695127,0.052564148,0.18746245,0.001031113,0.00008529663,0.000049007347,0.00008793838,0.7089965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96894115,0.0025041346,0.004843335,0.008561576,0.00064981024,0.00010239104,0.000016972333,0.000059393984,0.014321195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96511745,0.019930182,0.0009047302,0.0023249611,0.008661695,0.0030609095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838081,0.009286279,0.0011051133,0.0016464507,0.0026727973,0.0014812666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026146183,0.00033931714,0.0007412498,0.0026595704,0.007908099,0.02353485,0.0027696865,0.008449705,0.0029413777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025744887,0.0003663707,0.000597232,0.0025087653,0.048481066,0.013981022,0.006418976,0.01085652,0.0006292999],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029936482,0.0000061704677,0.000052792224,0.000006472234,0.0000012628436,0.000014639403,0.0007917415,0.0001456941,0.000021109832,0.9960038,0.00090934895,0.002044014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011640513,0.0000135822465,0.00026375125,0.0000862641,0.0000043207306,0.000029596105,0.0014204145,0.00094535673,0.00009234518,0.9557168,0.041403476,0.000012382343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020856045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021365203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026146183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017811378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018258331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13827592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001342683","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000500","title":"Boomerangs over Lac Léman: Transnational Lobbying and Foreign Venue Shopping in WTO Dispute Settlement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Settlement (finance); International trade; Business; World trade; Government (linguistics); China; Foreign direct investment; International economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Payment; Finance","score_opus":0.04105414892897555,"score_gpt":0.26850761295329556,"score_spread":0.22745346402432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001342683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48397315,0.00645359,0.0077925967,0.014930948,0.00013647768,0.00012013749,0.000072401985,0.000026692112,0.48649403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920225,0.00049210613,0.00033593847,0.00070206815,0.000038553626,0.000028382477,0.000017074524,0.000006880636,0.006356546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900238,0.005413868,0.0002891043,0.00088962703,0.0010891916,0.0022944417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986219,0.007938151,0.0025913012,0.00089079904,0.0011444715,0.0012163308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009238353,0.0002560777,0.00057350105,0.0019132056,0.008240816,0.013354772,0.0012221663,0.0056573087,0.012805603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014701823,0.00026512842,0.0005545372,0.0019851613,0.018040242,0.00805906,0.008233415,0.005115685,0.0007026993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006750796,0.000068234185,0.011266612,0.00007191203,0.000016956574,0.001692349,0.01839079,0.00039486535,0.00018910629,0.955291,0.0030936801,0.009457018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009731121,0.0001992177,0.041648317,0.001824219,0.00013364913,0.0022149577,0.21651442,0.005527501,0.0011236324,0.5218062,0.20874892,0.00016172207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0143443905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027297799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0143443905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039711664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035729224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04885763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007375031","doi":"10.1017/s1474745611000103","title":"Mutually agreed solutions under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: An Analytical Framework after the<i>Softwood Lumber</i>Arbitration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Arbitration; Enforcement; Settlement (finance); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; International trade law; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.13893545138941918,"score_gpt":0.3328775943024434,"score_spread":0.19394214291302422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007375031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020208895,0.0078811245,0.38169783,0.06901521,0.0010463201,0.00041405557,0.000139479,0.00007238574,0.5195247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8698188,0.0034100374,0.096187934,0.005476419,0.0009485181,0.0010445726,0.000098851415,0.00006776939,0.022947134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661047,0.024690332,0.0013323185,0.0017502129,0.0046792408,0.0014433385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846485,0.010163163,0.0015195735,0.0011245825,0.0021455367,0.00039847847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033701923,0.00076966954,0.001265572,0.005421752,0.0066542057,0.015646623,0.0038707952,0.012059953,0.0050723017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021503681,0.0007423395,0.0016459698,0.0035746815,0.033226863,0.01608384,0.007039349,0.008528761,0.0007342758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.2870987e-7,0.0000020536586,0.000008093397,0.000005455083,0.0000010291727,0.0000127717385,0.0002643857,0.00016891469,0.000006738081,0.99884725,0.00019505718,0.0004876646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004596987,0.000005758341,0.000038402835,0.00009198403,0.000004097013,0.000018012097,0.0006969155,0.0018860269,0.000044446395,0.9828531,0.014350401,0.0000062355093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050243195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048542675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033701923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011825056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011929913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17823493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031991483","doi":"10.1017/s1474745606002928","title":"Trade rules and climate change subsidies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Protectionism; Scope (computer science); Greenhouse gas; Limiting; Climate change; Economics; Public economics; International economics; International trade; Natural resource economics; Business; Market economy","score_opus":0.13204753289093593,"score_gpt":0.2685674010893236,"score_spread":0.13651986819838766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031991483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117289044,0.057564016,0.019698381,0.03149181,0.0007264479,0.000057666788,0.00042098187,0.00009346453,0.7726582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951126,0.017775955,0.001954514,0.005107968,0.00042924148,0.000040945346,0.00015543362,0.000033048906,0.023376845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985226,0.00054635596,0.00008394268,0.00019718397,0.00045523277,0.00019480959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953366,0.002449125,0.0012125049,0.00028157566,0.0005891656,0.00013107229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021356603,0.0001505074,0.00031293638,0.0009857715,0.0009943297,0.004136366,0.00030471,0.0018807673,0.0049293074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008238201,0.0001458573,0.00036159472,0.0011822506,0.0023814123,0.0019004152,0.0006793659,0.001408079,0.00043043133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027609203,0.000017775626,0.002436434,0.00007824043,0.00002257243,0.00010694056,0.00011713802,0.0036969467,0.00014977096,0.9671565,0.0059393696,0.020250544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026741636,0.00002552369,0.008282483,0.00030358258,0.000032868313,0.00012681785,0.00018869025,0.0021018607,0.00027868984,0.83063686,0.15797883,0.000017072442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076845055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00748685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076845055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021466224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025449926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016490161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065220538","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000317","title":"Renewable Energy and Government Support: Time to ‘Green’ the SCM Agreement?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Renewable energy; Treaty; Greenhouse gas; Incentive; Feed-in tariff; Tariff; Government (linguistics); Energy subsidies; Fossil fuel; International trade; Economics; Business; Duty; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Energy policy; Market economy; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.010783783380882463,"score_gpt":0.24454990640410043,"score_spread":0.23376612302321798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065220538","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074590947,0.020032922,0.0006711553,0.84360605,0.0032665029,0.000015974976,0.00006639895,0.00003112368,0.124850854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5665507,0.019966492,0.0015405795,0.35950717,0.0065255268,0.00009947464,0.0001222985,0.00009508208,0.0455927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849577,0.006909426,0.0005268926,0.00081749656,0.0039953794,0.0027930771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97476995,0.016327966,0.0015313665,0.0012238122,0.0046495968,0.0014972577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021916443,0.00024819744,0.0005928116,0.001604248,0.0047019967,0.014992612,0.0019557246,0.0198274,0.013680153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040249657,0.00024234879,0.00064445817,0.0024852185,0.00967748,0.011175428,0.003662123,0.011914527,0.0012248877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014957328,0.000027453705,0.00025439332,0.000088757406,0.0000054340276,0.00010525085,0.001292561,0.00015653553,0.000109202214,0.89081615,0.08957332,0.017555952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030278217,0.000025086878,0.0013414152,0.0011629725,0.000009988411,0.000056486835,0.0044905734,0.00027857648,0.0002681986,0.19065745,0.8016465,0.000032570024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029128322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033244397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029128322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01081227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021977404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115906656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078188506","doi":"10.1017/s1474745608003972","title":"The US–Canada softwood lumber dispute and the WTO definition of subsidy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"U.S. Department of Commerce","keywords":"Stumpage; Subsidy; Softwood; Business; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); International trade; Economics; Finance; Agricultural economics; Market economy; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry","score_opus":0.057031177800155985,"score_gpt":0.19254502932886708,"score_spread":0.1355138515287111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078188506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040551912,0.020936498,0.012202744,0.07081617,0.0009791515,0.00014098658,0.0009822706,0.00007817289,0.85331196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92274576,0.0053911353,0.004985055,0.026732901,0.0003009388,0.00018049982,0.00031150074,0.00006697737,0.039285116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925804,0.0013046456,0.00023492187,0.000592219,0.004103013,0.0011848352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936026,0.002007194,0.00041642654,0.00037136584,0.0031652881,0.00043713878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003927561,0.00036861634,0.000554528,0.0028441036,0.005704679,0.008199652,0.0017180984,0.005561738,0.0032825011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120118195,0.00028820554,0.00040709862,0.004263635,0.010872565,0.0022337204,0.0017445307,0.0049396493,0.00021207958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094888965,0.0000070266906,0.0005158434,0.000017966844,0.0000037076752,0.000049017897,0.00034650188,0.0004295189,0.000046775433,0.98188937,0.013461945,0.0032227254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039878443,0.000020910587,0.010757559,0.00096956716,0.00004077021,0.00014950745,0.0015165699,0.0035737196,0.00036427853,0.35241333,0.6300743,0.00007947455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8856418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8553846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11435819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051950183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061578866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37692672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079600291","doi":"10.1017/s1474745613000232","title":"Sealing animal welfare into the GATT exceptions: the international dimension of animal welfare in WTO disputes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Argument (complex analysis); Welfare; CONTEST; Relevance (law); Law and economics; International law; Dimension (graph theory); Economics; Political science; International trade; Public economics; Law; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.02061315627317476,"score_gpt":0.29993099530657796,"score_spread":0.2793178390334032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079600291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07269681,0.17109233,0.006738112,0.15087508,0.002022656,0.000062575746,0.00011697792,0.00004514867,0.5963503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89769137,0.04901092,0.0019364046,0.02974601,0.002004956,0.00006494291,0.00008026748,0.000033906257,0.019431194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894481,0.0055004177,0.0006125987,0.0006639818,0.0027509497,0.0010239173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98554206,0.009797846,0.001413632,0.0004800858,0.0024840909,0.00028228774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01505543,0.0002915062,0.00066680176,0.0024960819,0.0026117903,0.007804696,0.0009385612,0.0066560055,0.0027279865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013843909,0.00021571812,0.0005297556,0.0025108783,0.012019037,0.0052249166,0.0024796533,0.004828219,0.00025891152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141094415,0.00002940792,0.0010615434,0.0002721974,0.000015614096,0.00028627753,0.0030660199,0.0003519454,0.00020441566,0.963915,0.012443657,0.018339869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018256522,0.000078895224,0.011056986,0.0040975963,0.00007837313,0.0004862882,0.010610367,0.0008588566,0.0006466688,0.4280038,0.5440058,0.000058100115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01332125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014822887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01505543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006922908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07962167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115457048","doi":"10.1017/s1474745613000220","title":"Law, politics, and the true cost of protectionism: the choice of trade remedies or binding overhang","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Protectionism; Flexibility (engineering); Government (linguistics); Politics; Economics; Law and economics; International economics; International trade; Public economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.09272934411199478,"score_gpt":0.2548911846639833,"score_spread":0.1621618405519885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115457048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61961585,0.03718958,0.018283347,0.054380383,0.0002843388,0.00008951966,0.0003647822,0.000048247573,0.26974395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951507,0.001708656,0.000373654,0.00086164294,0.00009536795,0.000014461296,0.00001355446,0.000005346135,0.0017765694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906985,0.005235499,0.00041201932,0.0007569802,0.001942746,0.0009542092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9376998,0.04761157,0.008648562,0.0021871026,0.0030689288,0.0007840659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010944887,0.00015668057,0.0009187681,0.0017468601,0.0011697409,0.0064651254,0.0006828175,0.0033814237,0.0061817653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04451727,0.0002613956,0.00047034712,0.0015597296,0.008945286,0.0040869904,0.0011872149,0.0027057107,0.00036772975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013767405,0.000070212685,0.013433038,0.00019550844,0.000095366486,0.00017883246,0.0003359725,0.003200204,0.00038391244,0.9575382,0.0035038113,0.020927293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001555649,0.00018792969,0.046907973,0.0006649074,0.00028718833,0.00023557416,0.0016456326,0.0055976375,0.001321275,0.9168857,0.026046425,0.0000643096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003243539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004550911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010944887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030022527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022372038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057882786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129285424","doi":"10.1017/s1474745610000303","title":"Transparency as a trade policy tool: the WTO's cloudy windows","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Subsidy; International trade; Corporate governance; Business; International economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Finance; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.01852309315563454,"score_gpt":0.3236709967197642,"score_spread":0.30514790356412963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129285424","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05719247,0.023244297,0.13992472,0.49001196,0.0026932065,0.00014141179,0.00014098117,0.00021020128,0.2864408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586048,0.006914702,0.012272644,0.013373854,0.0012687191,0.000087757195,0.00002213954,0.000071487004,0.0073838388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794016,0.012359077,0.0006690189,0.0008439635,0.0056369123,0.0010895374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483404,0.040001795,0.004049454,0.0027604685,0.00412162,0.00072619016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02334752,0.00043064388,0.0005391619,0.0023393778,0.0036665155,0.015269508,0.0012318034,0.0064146006,0.002599627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042519398,0.00033514015,0.0008446605,0.0022029497,0.018848367,0.017025618,0.003941427,0.010535353,0.00019768407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006555482,0.0000048665447,0.00018489035,0.000027456872,0.0000042992065,0.000044532022,0.0004455048,0.0006597783,0.00005549843,0.99079996,0.002904045,0.0048626093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120299455,0.000022119219,0.00088661903,0.00048389245,0.000018655139,0.00009295964,0.0010391679,0.0050923014,0.0004399505,0.9292199,0.06265758,0.000034880984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009257148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00575473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02334752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006893583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077363066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123474896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139320157","doi":"10.1017/s1474745608003686","title":"Comment: United States – Final Dumping Determination on Softwood Lumber from Canada: Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada (Softwood V)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Content (measure theory); Agricultural economics; Pulp and paper industry; Waste management; Business; Environmental science; Advertising; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04484874389896933,"score_gpt":0.2704103580348495,"score_spread":0.22556161413588013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139320157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018652312,0.0023164817,0.00077037286,0.8592513,0.006977573,0.00017591404,0.0029278158,0.00031529323,0.108612895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031853594,0.0008349932,0.0003579567,0.9091357,0.00080987724,0.00007923513,0.0002915716,0.000086017775,0.056550946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993046,0.00034243093,0.00029865492,0.0008035965,0.003025107,0.002484211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878419,0.00523362,0.00049921713,0.0003271571,0.0052056024,0.0008925789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043570045,0.00095678883,0.001129025,0.0015242375,0.01760486,0.0061941314,0.0057919784,0.053511083,0.011703638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013801426,0.0012476684,0.0018367157,0.0028909044,0.0061272453,0.0022984827,0.0024363897,0.020712353,0.0043151365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008229066,0.000023172439,0.0015180692,0.00007069659,0.000025718135,0.00054985384,0.0018703919,0.00021902985,0.00057760667,0.020990921,0.97092944,0.0031427029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013960722,0.000053315114,0.009874553,0.00040489814,0.000158324,0.00028414276,0.0076239635,0.00046705717,0.0027611237,0.007836449,0.9701367,0.00025988134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9506345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96285063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053511083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034281854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10436591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2487334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139322096","doi":"10.1017/s1474745604001740","title":"<i>Canada – Dairy</i> Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Subsidy; International trade; Business; World trade; Agreement on Agriculture; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Political science; Economics; Geography; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.034533272402374464,"score_gpt":0.20023018019427172,"score_spread":0.16569690779189725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139322096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025142642,0.12265992,0.004397109,0.17466357,0.009750321,0.0002447229,0.0059385044,0.00028950142,0.65691364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39381588,0.101986095,0.010969411,0.16516225,0.0037293788,0.00023390909,0.0049642012,0.00035597247,0.31878296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940844,0.00029427154,0.0001931968,0.00034493222,0.004182843,0.00090036396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956806,0.00061094493,0.0004748753,0.00013576436,0.0028444056,0.0002534473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020479944,0.00047800923,0.00040676518,0.0024699995,0.0040900796,0.0049875583,0.0015298955,0.0028929063,0.0040600277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005043954,0.00026384363,0.0005068296,0.0045417487,0.0027867947,0.0010707593,0.0010026887,0.0030657535,0.000581986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013193472,0.000046358073,0.005742875,0.0006714046,0.00007137348,0.00047570825,0.0012100241,0.0010467633,0.0023471473,0.36484194,0.5760725,0.047341898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008501277,0.0000120763925,0.008566431,0.00021292958,0.000027325046,0.00007304205,0.0002754988,0.00014638135,0.0010157468,0.0039116303,0.98572046,0.000029986546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9469965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9543382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05300349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04089157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.094189435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29669052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146523027","doi":"10.1017/s1474745613000128","title":"Fragmentation in international trade law: insights from the global investment regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bilateralism; International trade; International economics; Treaty; Economics; International economic law; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; International trade law; Trade barrier; Free trade; Harmonization; International law; Politics; Political science; Multilateralism; Public international law; Law","score_opus":0.021380417586551154,"score_gpt":0.24975850647425182,"score_spread":0.22837808888770067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146523027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27533773,0.03971883,0.019520331,0.034839347,0.00014814484,0.0000721588,0.00014367896,0.000038121092,0.6301816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883165,0.0067537166,0.0012152783,0.0010626708,0.00012391723,0.000027900225,0.0000557975,0.000010149963,0.0024339943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703026,0.0015212423,0.00011745611,0.00017878517,0.0007551201,0.00039717613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943315,0.0030788,0.0012713756,0.00044783799,0.0006244007,0.00024608808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041893334,0.00016275115,0.00047576087,0.0038906347,0.0018835193,0.0058106165,0.0005973362,0.0013918126,0.0028021473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005672274,0.00018806208,0.00045144442,0.005903438,0.011817429,0.0060670003,0.0032970356,0.0021358563,0.00025681293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007149902,0.000013749517,0.0023595514,0.00004414577,0.0000058248274,0.0001051671,0.0033297515,0.0013450307,0.000058042522,0.98164994,0.0013424472,0.0097392555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018269344,0.00003805988,0.01525176,0.0007546598,0.000021588243,0.000329959,0.010206989,0.0038139564,0.00012293358,0.89212316,0.07729948,0.000019194025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007115868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058794157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007115868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006077044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027168451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044092298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154067369","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000130","title":"The Creation of the Multilateral Trade Court: Design and Experiential Learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Legalization; Experiential learning; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Settlement (finance); International trade; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04094902729198923,"score_gpt":0.31577908829154716,"score_spread":0.2748300609995579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154067369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78011924,0.0003927958,0.13810751,0.0022092457,0.00010818812,0.0039334293,0.000080944745,0.00036527685,0.07468337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930218,0.00017774854,0.06286893,0.00021779558,0.000016847947,0.0018958669,0.000053950203,0.00004056754,0.0045103016],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775352,0.019174173,0.00036301842,0.0010844287,0.001099231,0.0007439542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565391,0.03487243,0.0012748648,0.003323391,0.0015068509,0.0024833374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028491477,0.0004814512,0.00041739634,0.0010300624,0.0019684806,0.005902655,0.0034530968,0.00131419,0.009270404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03356345,0.00040581686,0.00037525393,0.0008726108,0.007363919,0.0038342313,0.0053171585,0.0019641903,0.0008178935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016020417,0.019384181,0.011976779,0.0020610406,0.00010747565,0.0008570941,0.15210247,0.018377759,0.01191145,0.19810483,0.0058614784,0.5776535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004414038,0.020071615,0.016379327,0.0027300364,0.00036463665,0.00094595965,0.18025674,0.082709834,0.036382914,0.45822155,0.19711752,0.00040585856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005754182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011095812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028491477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037517028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038805816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15067917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159189050","doi":"10.1017/s1474745609990280","title":"Continued suspense: <i>EC–Hormones</i> and WTO disciplines on discrimination and domestic regulation Appellate Body Reports: <i>Canada/United States – Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC – Hormones Dispute</i>, WT/DS320/AB/R,WT/DS321/AB/R, adopted 14 November 2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; De facto; Scientific evidence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.009172046209259752,"score_gpt":0.26870307862923687,"score_spread":0.2595310324199771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159189050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016635206,0.013733755,0.0031735455,0.15263434,0.005412404,0.0004378287,0.0014091872,0.00023868417,0.8063252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28277436,0.009504354,0.0059110476,0.38281098,0.0033851073,0.00075391226,0.000937488,0.00024597277,0.31367686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815576,0.0028223235,0.0013265517,0.0019264084,0.009718688,0.002648435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832758,0.008404885,0.00086040003,0.0012504738,0.0056881313,0.00052041677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013116148,0.0006260256,0.0008698717,0.0013918749,0.005445991,0.010773346,0.0033444897,0.027740397,0.005480293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019774126,0.00072096,0.0011941822,0.0020135907,0.0071778577,0.002280539,0.0023321551,0.015352043,0.0025311173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007299778,0.00008014286,0.0013673392,0.00020819002,0.000043760567,0.0011425941,0.0021384591,0.00049444515,0.002263421,0.5941157,0.3841731,0.013899893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006864674,0.00006495253,0.0050790384,0.000845073,0.000075690805,0.0002605699,0.0008737731,0.00057524047,0.001752381,0.033203408,0.95706797,0.00013316303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33285767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3089463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66714233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013239768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03146745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66184044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166768069","doi":"10.1017/s1474745611000334","title":"Polly wants a Doha deal: what does the trade community think?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Latin Americans; Negotiation; Political science; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.16949071016423495,"score_gpt":0.24957609496174923,"score_spread":0.08008538479751429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166768069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031142572,0.02504355,0.00092544075,0.8994853,0.006393701,0.00006491216,0.000059355854,0.000055134282,0.03683006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4854429,0.03256687,0.0023469178,0.4270356,0.007447607,0.00024138369,0.0002529074,0.00028812198,0.044377685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98187536,0.010469576,0.00040676235,0.0011945887,0.002956221,0.0030975672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97258264,0.013748292,0.0018862825,0.00048252387,0.0024120477,0.008888266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019454625,0.0006100362,0.0010593932,0.002397446,0.02384472,0.035869677,0.0022860484,0.015510171,0.0072783586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033737447,0.000974839,0.0005270434,0.0029055716,0.023025403,0.026887285,0.010008698,0.020873906,0.0026645926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073476964,0.00012707697,0.0057039736,0.00068604486,0.000039718903,0.0017210124,0.6149216,0.00009472675,0.00070512696,0.043467227,0.2779109,0.054549087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011943295,0.000041584703,0.002311562,0.0008873934,0.0000076380975,0.00034060507,0.6130731,0.0001285531,0.00012822423,0.013501776,0.36951166,0.00005589306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013947341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014348368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035869677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006902328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012912241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10288715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197767697","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000282","title":"Too much Zeal on Seals? Animal Welfare, Public Morals, and Consumer Ethics at the Bar of the WTO","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Public policy; Law and economics; Welfare; Product (mathematics); Political science; Public economics; Law; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.12611441625777353,"score_gpt":0.3548256356347773,"score_spread":0.22871121937700378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197767697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036673,0.2092015,0.0021307766,0.5042161,0.0034186726,0.000024028786,0.000076196295,0.000018955185,0.2442407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77699655,0.07137689,0.00096291327,0.1169887,0.00485863,0.00004629628,0.000046679463,0.000028796254,0.028694443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895989,0.0071675796,0.00022170409,0.0005058245,0.0018169429,0.0006890493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882387,0.007937949,0.0007893733,0.00035084548,0.0024011564,0.00028197514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010574325,0.0001958987,0.00047748935,0.0009155829,0.0024117287,0.0060727457,0.00056213146,0.0063234456,0.0029755575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009948538,0.0001621087,0.00031998268,0.0006814695,0.012435767,0.003276195,0.0015287604,0.0046997215,0.00052114576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032487034,0.000031134507,0.00085257064,0.00029665,0.000022743847,0.00020043514,0.0030729987,0.00031640945,0.00034956544,0.9080127,0.06306926,0.023743056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020036841,0.000083267936,0.0060883746,0.0036765563,0.00005094506,0.0001992973,0.0064184065,0.00040184785,0.00081044075,0.35892606,0.6232772,0.000047467955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015768886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016584598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015768886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035490624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049334327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055923045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214531623","doi":"10.1017/s1474745606001406","title":"United States – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (WT/DS217/AB/R: DSR 2003:I,375)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Appeal; Dumping; Legislation; International trade; Political science; State (computer science); Business; Law; International economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01626606479665345,"score_gpt":0.2795627833131271,"score_spread":0.2632967185164737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214531623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016293606,0.012699358,0.003497848,0.022977656,0.0023035624,0.0007380899,0.01574703,0.00061696366,0.92512584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1520113,0.018004863,0.01423367,0.09761016,0.00094314397,0.0026095062,0.014827483,0.0002613542,0.69949865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979298,0.00028540206,0.00019047626,0.00022918575,0.0010038042,0.0003612802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842095,0.00031107344,0.00018917484,0.00014825241,0.00086087344,0.00006970952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022080787,0.0008207666,0.00041372134,0.0013525384,0.0019216778,0.0036100054,0.0011129641,0.006780359,0.008049105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043334416,0.00066189864,0.0005672576,0.0017932251,0.00079319795,0.0012446477,0.00091548555,0.0027677433,0.006820023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018708629,0.00023215816,0.0025702172,0.00030281846,0.000025588284,0.00055650936,0.0004974377,0.000620338,0.002970954,0.17385751,0.7807774,0.037402004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040109688,0.00004101992,0.0037860984,0.00028991202,0.00002218395,0.00012833337,0.000087574284,0.0001569639,0.00057385315,0.0032007983,0.9916487,0.00002448232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09539569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075932175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09539569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033095998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00949614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18968081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216720036","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605001217","title":"United States – Section 129(c)(1) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (WTO Doc. WT/DS22/R of 15 July 2002): Beating Around (The) Bush","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Duty; Section (typography); Commission; Legislation; Business; Political science; International economics; Law; Economics; Advertising","score_opus":0.02378641596569264,"score_gpt":0.30153172373259945,"score_spread":0.2777453077669068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216720036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014308166,0.011917281,0.0016863503,0.037555426,0.0018965871,0.00033636473,0.0026249944,0.00027255807,0.92940235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11493599,0.005392295,0.0036267727,0.083428815,0.000504106,0.0005017089,0.0011401555,0.00015425097,0.79031587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976987,0.00043734472,0.00017639647,0.00028850677,0.0009452766,0.0004537511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983309,0.00036593035,0.00014024835,0.00010858336,0.000972569,0.00008182478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002417657,0.00035257035,0.00041976932,0.0006684303,0.0042894483,0.0044000354,0.0009327995,0.00750404,0.014302617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004197944,0.0005810803,0.00048787595,0.0011555628,0.0013560873,0.0013288347,0.0009916651,0.003352373,0.008868123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005588588,0.00008844627,0.0024377254,0.00024321186,0.000026621252,0.00041185765,0.0019555702,0.00017954092,0.0013090157,0.2499734,0.71796423,0.025354523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009172424,0.000024026858,0.003367772,0.00016907853,0.0000121906505,0.00006960403,0.00026836904,0.000076619806,0.0003153794,0.0025386862,0.9931335,0.000015744252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34967062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44940686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34967062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004533899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013393737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69527066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253429046","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605001254","title":"Canada – Export Credits and Loan Guarantees for Regional Aircraft (WT/DS222/R) A Comment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loan; Subsidy; Corporation; Business; Finance; Jurisprudence; Export credit agency; International trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.03428064084412347,"score_gpt":0.31151202796288724,"score_spread":0.2772313871187638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253429046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030159391,0.005482268,0.0016617528,0.46954116,0.004226846,0.00036030784,0.008892572,0.00041832615,0.4792574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17765447,0.003340329,0.0013891583,0.4602488,0.0017726681,0.00022920905,0.0014129147,0.00022690733,0.35372555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638075,0.00018493719,0.0001272544,0.0005088944,0.0016778698,0.0011203778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99457353,0.0014437687,0.00021468467,0.00020446476,0.0032555663,0.00030794242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027663799,0.0006715709,0.00054481765,0.0011755179,0.01060463,0.0060727196,0.0026760625,0.020493077,0.015528603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00764709,0.0006808625,0.0010065042,0.0019572508,0.0019514794,0.0014237264,0.0010580961,0.009385494,0.0027129916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065602195,0.00003053498,0.0028742973,0.00009067826,0.00002647842,0.00068526214,0.001281725,0.00045943976,0.0011064281,0.06160012,0.92634714,0.0054323357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006303038,0.000024670999,0.010387706,0.00016585953,0.000060488033,0.00013232634,0.000967798,0.0006110322,0.0013143074,0.0029449773,0.98322254,0.0001052942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96337277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9732939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036627233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03536818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052713357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25661534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264664405","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000415","title":"<i>US – COOL (Article 21.5 – Canada and Mexico)</i>, DS384/DS386","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Compliance (psychology); Political science; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Database","score_opus":0.024948480358736702,"score_gpt":0.2773930130732434,"score_spread":0.2524445327145067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264664405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009266412,0.0036820858,0.0035359047,0.06253169,0.008254421,0.0016473118,0.009539585,0.0010940965,0.9004485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059858847,0.0029413982,0.010256771,0.19657649,0.0019570275,0.0022337958,0.0042480165,0.00048754705,0.7214401],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876381,0.00089248933,0.0008427996,0.0013705582,0.0064224093,0.0028337794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886131,0.0022344368,0.00075616414,0.00070387434,0.0072643072,0.00042815474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008213922,0.0010688519,0.0011255157,0.0026298948,0.012742955,0.011557022,0.0040916433,0.024435418,0.019301258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018148514,0.0012149134,0.0014735634,0.0035354379,0.003953574,0.0022148518,0.002447428,0.012060538,0.009486412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004571859,0.00009083992,0.00088290055,0.00016174644,0.000022287008,0.00024249037,0.0009922639,0.00019410257,0.00066981645,0.10000997,0.88841826,0.008269532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003645751,0.000039319046,0.00647714,0.00032658572,0.000038169703,0.000103195496,0.0006819138,0.00023941809,0.0010389597,0.003643247,0.9872825,0.000093081355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7729805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8020374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22701949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026921285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055189837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4567129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266883631","doi":"10.1017/s1474745603001125","title":"US – Export Restraints: United States – Measures Treating Export Restraints as Subsidies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Plaintiff; International trade; Duty; Legislation; Principal (computer security); Consistency (knowledge bases); Business; World trade; International trade law; Political science; Law; International economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04373032196484535,"score_gpt":0.3213137175900134,"score_spread":0.2775833956251681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266883631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16696635,0.0127517795,0.004074835,0.038713392,0.0007014496,0.00007133099,0.00032568633,0.00006442603,0.77633077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333291,0.0051420284,0.001968786,0.024565462,0.00020238095,0.00007160088,0.00017949735,0.000025118698,0.034516137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957898,0.00079920713,0.00018388496,0.0004287783,0.0020537595,0.00074452604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967456,0.0011397697,0.00059585343,0.00027285662,0.0011017063,0.00014414616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024055005,0.00018361364,0.00025918643,0.0009830395,0.004215514,0.0048321793,0.0007709273,0.003427792,0.0026494332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065099173,0.00022541075,0.0004079706,0.0023565611,0.004781939,0.0017507401,0.0021139232,0.0032510029,0.00031811386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035777284,0.000049421316,0.0076217554,0.00008369428,0.00002510292,0.00025202142,0.0034287781,0.00042860888,0.0007942923,0.948956,0.021045165,0.017279323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028312586,0.000103035105,0.049238056,0.0006003414,0.00008883282,0.000455918,0.004718794,0.00083930197,0.002203679,0.04605663,0.8955997,0.00006734125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.290606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32494164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.290606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008291175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01629125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57782894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267296807","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605001308","title":"United States – Preliminary Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada: What is a Subsidy?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stumpage; Softwood; Subsidy; Agricultural economics; Economics; Pulp and paper industry; Business; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.013011418876176243,"score_gpt":0.2428156819854117,"score_spread":0.22980426310923546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267296807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12787399,0.0439235,0.003100286,0.15742527,0.0043338416,0.0015325414,0.010199676,0.0005803171,0.65103054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50404036,0.025570106,0.01081163,0.15209638,0.0006905908,0.0006196849,0.0063617113,0.00011832601,0.2996912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620736,0.00023040325,0.00021513786,0.00029170953,0.0019962774,0.0010590422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345386,0.00075472053,0.00020175356,0.00011573871,0.0049376055,0.0005362704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031761017,0.00032558915,0.00042431732,0.0020791315,0.0048217895,0.0034298566,0.0015449374,0.004578141,0.0038966562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00589351,0.00044246597,0.00057308405,0.0018666241,0.0010165011,0.00079045363,0.0006007834,0.0027745152,0.0006464438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032814624,0.00025469242,0.018144375,0.0012526381,0.00010308376,0.0020864732,0.0020551991,0.0012823049,0.0075643016,0.16010526,0.707007,0.09981658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000507282,0.00006501144,0.0393879,0.0004961482,0.000086585045,0.00018831607,0.00064369396,0.00033415543,0.002388453,0.0020806093,0.95421404,0.0000643381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9478754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9695785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05212462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022708127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12849362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16475976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274354561","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000452","title":"<i>Bilcon et al.</i> v. <i>Canada</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Free trade agreement; Law; Law and economics; Economics; International trade; Free trade","score_opus":0.038106125671534506,"score_gpt":0.2582316033095882,"score_spread":0.2201254776380537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274354561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058747814,0.00908761,0.001084502,0.4179108,0.0057867114,0.00020761097,0.003458024,0.00037707674,0.55621296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0679656,0.004385651,0.0013572522,0.691744,0.0011154229,0.00020564966,0.0011815296,0.00017723154,0.23186761],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98987573,0.0005128792,0.000315948,0.0008997688,0.0051085507,0.0032871712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934056,0.0012912862,0.00024234613,0.00017608992,0.00441623,0.000468532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040708086,0.0007364931,0.0006466022,0.0022071924,0.020637406,0.014601866,0.0038245784,0.018424854,0.013691191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014173553,0.00079285976,0.0010108482,0.003472858,0.0054879496,0.0031032132,0.0025524818,0.014455378,0.0044092424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018246188,0.0000115213,0.00062965206,0.00004740629,0.000008390513,0.00008815648,0.00091124995,0.000047198195,0.00015158718,0.058897294,0.9350139,0.0041754614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000198463,0.000011189734,0.0032915445,0.00023752813,0.000031184707,0.00006187693,0.0017507472,0.000121835874,0.00044703716,0.005842913,0.9881074,0.000076922246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95254225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97722584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047457755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04086883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091071896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29652554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278081846","doi":"10.1017/s147474560600142x","title":"United States – Final Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada (AB-2003-6, WT/DS257/AB/R)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Duty; Political science; Pulp and paper industry; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.017590678911151063,"score_gpt":0.2674382720828339,"score_spread":0.2498475931716828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278081846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060208064,0.004733963,0.0016492463,0.025113061,0.0019736511,0.00044777093,0.0030344496,0.00016389645,0.9026759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3402985,0.0023433685,0.0024931482,0.054711137,0.00035722626,0.00020449789,0.0018673885,0.00009645795,0.59762824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489933,0.00019089779,0.00017123148,0.0004426132,0.0029261783,0.0013697468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996779,0.000563633,0.000119223514,0.00013971979,0.0021859491,0.000212607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025907576,0.00045745674,0.0003712872,0.00132483,0.009188306,0.006318725,0.0024921363,0.010530075,0.00910925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042668623,0.00055000343,0.00076189556,0.0014640362,0.0016284698,0.0008167198,0.0009683619,0.005189836,0.0023664604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020021621,0.00018637285,0.0076146033,0.00021601761,0.000067206616,0.002042821,0.0033825403,0.00086186314,0.008171658,0.28324392,0.6677794,0.02623343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043491782,0.00005569595,0.01491978,0.00020092222,0.00005472276,0.00020472473,0.0016251149,0.00052301923,0.004390019,0.0053767553,0.97251624,0.00008947778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8825804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92514104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1174196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021070033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04098243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23622215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301036686","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000464","title":"Nature and Enforceability of WTO-plus SPS and TBT Provisions in Canada's PTAs: From<i>NAFTA</i>to<i>CETA</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technical barriers to trade; International trade; Enforcement; Phytosanitary certification; Customs union; Business; Harmonization; International economics; Conformity assessment; European union; Trade barrier; Free trade; World trade; International trade law; Economics; Political science; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01904689184486959,"score_gpt":0.290531257176712,"score_spread":0.27148436533184245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301036686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49455538,0.002336936,0.008383012,0.016196035,0.00044409063,0.0010510316,0.005210572,0.00027005858,0.47155285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513033,0.0009963122,0.0063349456,0.0036139053,0.000054597233,0.00019905483,0.0017347482,0.00007002244,0.03569309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672218,0.0016998167,0.0013002494,0.0020065957,0.022156576,0.0056149694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9394534,0.01092755,0.006531159,0.0037752395,0.035328683,0.003984031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011512984,0.0003950666,0.00047995304,0.0047769947,0.009043641,0.011294073,0.002078462,0.00218939,0.0029399206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03228699,0.0006243376,0.00092902593,0.0062335827,0.0064719347,0.0017638843,0.0023456675,0.005522994,0.000286531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034954373,0.00029986922,0.12628043,0.0004953541,0.0002762309,0.001390794,0.017222589,0.010176552,0.008012158,0.71076465,0.044161994,0.08056983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011548419,0.00022604605,0.4931844,0.0015097881,0.00043159444,0.00046253274,0.025122236,0.010700645,0.010060358,0.030466398,0.42726204,0.00045848356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98329306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08615268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08615268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19887176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6250844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309328903","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000057","title":"Mapping the Scope of Dispute Settlement in Regional Trade Agreements: Implications for the Multilateral Governance of Trade","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Settlement (finance); Corporate governance; Centrality; International trade; Typology; Regional trade; Political science; Business; Free trade; Geography","score_opus":0.13556806656693288,"score_gpt":0.2730057580859061,"score_spread":0.13743769151897323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309328903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8779281,0.002944146,0.06824764,0.0025920917,0.00004284992,0.00018197387,0.0010028791,0.00006265144,0.046997778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921474,0.0003669298,0.0067265816,0.000037794085,0.000018628742,0.00004688619,0.0002520679,0.000013419225,0.00039032332],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873812,0.008868282,0.0006742514,0.0011460999,0.0014047734,0.00052536646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9334935,0.04738548,0.010001627,0.0034093785,0.0044864593,0.0012236561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01614298,0.00016547392,0.00055312883,0.008665526,0.0013661849,0.006623982,0.0011641817,0.00074837485,0.0054312483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057536095,0.00023029056,0.0004945985,0.011275666,0.0038287845,0.0062004956,0.0039599747,0.0011036835,0.00035920375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025246257,0.00017185793,0.43888417,0.0008466254,0.0002365583,0.00052973337,0.036507092,0.018781038,0.0025783028,0.35979307,0.0025378072,0.13888137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065408516,0.0001248531,0.4927986,0.0011349107,0.00013180541,0.00046734602,0.09355069,0.03861421,0.0014300365,0.33594415,0.035664976,0.00007296932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063383393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053188438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01614298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020969594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018286227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08537328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460756315","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000070","title":"<i>United States – Certain Country of Origin Labelling (Cool) Requirements (US–Cool, Article 22.6 – United States)</i>, DS384/DS386","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Authorization; International trade; Value (mathematics); Business; Settlement (finance); Political science; Law; Finance; Payment","score_opus":0.039527760124683196,"score_gpt":0.31785778916968305,"score_spread":0.27833002904499987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460756315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062987856,0.013729868,0.002837062,0.052065138,0.005873732,0.0007159151,0.009611497,0.00073969737,0.9081284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097051166,0.011766858,0.011273433,0.34147492,0.002718368,0.0034733263,0.009527984,0.00043893725,0.52227503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215204,0.0014023745,0.00094486796,0.0009274315,0.0029978955,0.0015753583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319756,0.0022481408,0.00064426,0.00062159135,0.0030266785,0.00026181765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007446254,0.0009121895,0.0006627805,0.002753,0.0063898736,0.009265605,0.0026188267,0.019778641,0.01593694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012341272,0.0012568258,0.0014022313,0.0042336313,0.0032156894,0.0030624936,0.0022228367,0.0076894006,0.01310965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004971868,0.000093620685,0.00056033704,0.00023830011,0.000013898843,0.00020112132,0.0009375672,0.00015007342,0.0007718707,0.17833817,0.80907923,0.009566017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002762841,0.000032829834,0.003110775,0.0005301165,0.000015088299,0.00009089391,0.00029590784,0.00008814152,0.0005449631,0.006785705,0.9884233,0.000054566804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.191788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22342005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.191788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066846674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01931756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38134336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461767702","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000197","title":"John Jackson: A Tribute","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Art; Philosophy; Art history; Classics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03392591722821833,"score_gpt":0.3365287490613906,"score_spread":0.30260283183317227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461767702","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085523067,0.0941379,0.000598626,0.66647667,0.07454653,0.000029084455,0.000112302165,0.00006825978,0.1631754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022905726,0.031798594,0.0005888652,0.5691962,0.017195297,0.000078168545,0.00013050107,0.00013174642,0.35797483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954723,0.0013715201,0.0002192376,0.0007526514,0.0015475515,0.00063681207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944384,0.001924277,0.00020342722,0.0003044984,0.002282536,0.0008468628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042666094,0.00062557386,0.0008085665,0.001274909,0.0068661477,0.007517939,0.0015882802,0.010329707,0.030296866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021326967,0.00033172898,0.0006501151,0.0012304262,0.003428677,0.005273221,0.0028896898,0.011649722,0.0104485415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072798603,0.000008479213,0.00006839144,0.000046762194,0.000005239682,0.000082145845,0.00017055724,0.000016830729,0.000043780838,0.051434077,0.93648064,0.011635741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032867915,0.000005782042,0.000097258984,0.00019193639,0.000003248332,0.00005940493,0.00018866303,0.000014313394,0.000026981377,0.003972907,0.9954312,0.0000050442445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024085458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033210814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030296866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004542574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009379006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10135311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466742387","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000264","title":"John H. Jackson: Pioneer and Visionary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law; QUIET; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017328685932212734,"score_gpt":0.29959725070829335,"score_spread":0.28226856477608064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466742387","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008030155,0.5155089,0.0015748708,0.35572976,0.04565151,0.000036959325,0.000079576515,0.00007193041,0.08054352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03132368,0.33420348,0.004050369,0.2717561,0.04577102,0.00009647578,0.0001571931,0.00019997587,0.31244174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966804,0.0009311302,0.0001294858,0.0004835853,0.001479984,0.00029548374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933575,0.0016974626,0.00044878066,0.00019265863,0.00309796,0.0012057155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053587654,0.00064831023,0.00050087675,0.0026187918,0.0024320914,0.005038515,0.0011655943,0.005290864,0.007450206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011485584,0.0003500316,0.00034560115,0.0012364509,0.002501146,0.005394997,0.0017381825,0.006423253,0.004937416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020709253,0.00003540971,0.00015555466,0.00029028417,0.000007348312,0.00009626468,0.0005293164,0.000038098937,0.0002481268,0.042418223,0.91634274,0.039817967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023846787,0.000006623495,0.00009667169,0.0001553652,0.0000018337715,0.00005705371,0.00011930441,0.00001189879,0.000063636115,0.0029607334,0.99652076,0.0000037286984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0132453265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016824726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0132453265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040763468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009068328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029576123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527819544","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000446","title":"Reforming WTO-Civil Society Engagement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Civil society; Negotiation; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Value (mathematics); Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06715491265145038,"score_gpt":0.37111151927501457,"score_spread":0.30395660662356416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527819544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028039197,0.022058401,0.015741406,0.43327466,0.004155261,0.00016422108,0.000065237095,0.0001196443,0.49638203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8602388,0.009639529,0.0042911572,0.08070491,0.0029456543,0.00022033977,0.00007285504,0.00009944788,0.04178723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96482676,0.021735981,0.00091684173,0.0019763408,0.006153791,0.0043903063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665494,0.02110586,0.0024995452,0.0030182868,0.004664478,0.0021623718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047012918,0.0005004253,0.0004805754,0.002117747,0.004662296,0.01681602,0.0023184195,0.014072339,0.005450611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035393324,0.000304505,0.0005945499,0.0019360182,0.022951024,0.010867023,0.010071243,0.009980978,0.001016064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004192781,0.0000454382,0.0002477471,0.000067706984,0.0000064321657,0.000065781256,0.0029946745,0.00020814862,0.00012093602,0.97486264,0.011359301,0.010016966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019821337,0.000037979862,0.000912329,0.00062759814,0.000009817777,0.00006411899,0.004325928,0.00043491196,0.00031519838,0.4164762,0.57675993,0.000016189866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007475757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007026828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047012918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010217495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023780758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.248631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587988646","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000586","title":"<i>US–COOL</i> Retaliation: The WTO's Article 22.6 Arbitration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Revenue; International trade; Business; World trade; International economics; Market access; Economics; Law; Political science; Geography; Agriculture; Accounting","score_opus":0.08592947312171006,"score_gpt":0.25449183614743615,"score_spread":0.16856236302572608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587988646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048501417,0.0094347205,0.03695963,0.33660415,0.0070222225,0.00028629348,0.000723749,0.00037723297,0.56009066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7597892,0.0050345063,0.016422575,0.10986813,0.0057336497,0.0002899289,0.00041748848,0.00052759534,0.10191687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981519,0.007961525,0.00082035206,0.0012092937,0.0064073205,0.0020825362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776552,0.013284137,0.0027233684,0.0017882785,0.004010727,0.0005383532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022259463,0.0005963814,0.0005927224,0.0015814677,0.0049279067,0.015869532,0.0021257822,0.012716738,0.007902945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041049525,0.0004399979,0.0016570458,0.0014294207,0.0072571794,0.0056563728,0.0025183668,0.009266258,0.0015857476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026005066,0.00004069031,0.0011460538,0.000049540387,0.000022597644,0.00032919933,0.00096629985,0.0019936922,0.00042329004,0.88378334,0.103455156,0.0077641453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030076397,0.000069702015,0.0030722455,0.0008679421,0.00005713226,0.00037255522,0.0018069413,0.0141197,0.0020298394,0.31512558,0.66227716,0.00017119413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031143716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02578196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031143716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007877929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065483944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11772066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592072136","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000283","title":"Sunshine over Shanghai: Can the WTO Illuminate the Murky World of Chinese SOEs?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); Business; Politics; International trade; Investment (military); World trade; International economics; China; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06923715656236683,"score_gpt":0.26600627088605244,"score_spread":0.1967691143236856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592072136","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09366318,0.6726374,0.0027336024,0.15754128,0.009912392,0.000032048363,0.0003648936,0.00008490202,0.06303023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.683724,0.27197826,0.00076539454,0.020648045,0.0040981905,0.000021814896,0.00024909247,0.000042480107,0.018472636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989774,0.00055297837,0.000053591215,0.000057936137,0.00022113789,0.00013689525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787724,0.00080683484,0.00035693697,0.00013003331,0.00067783456,0.00015111847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003436415,0.0002504106,0.00026672595,0.0010060857,0.00061561854,0.002430211,0.00028598763,0.00095585163,0.00258597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032297892,0.00008578564,0.00029891275,0.0014692226,0.0015903655,0.0014788539,0.0005490627,0.0011278851,0.00026150479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038377682,0.000055703807,0.019384323,0.006318332,0.00031818976,0.001385968,0.0042807334,0.00465076,0.003209162,0.4251494,0.22188264,0.31298104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030739415,0.00016811673,0.042782996,0.0035042965,0.00017389788,0.00027573967,0.0030998224,0.0009509123,0.0014449159,0.03346243,0.91404724,0.000058979414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018523548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027862571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018523548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021427118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038756027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03683144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592092604","doi":"10.1017/s147474561700009x","title":"Consolidating International Investment Law: The Mega-Regionals as a Pathway towards Multilateral Rules","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; International trade law; International economic law; Multilateralism; International law; Investment (military); General partnership; Political science; Brexit; Foreign direct investment; European union; Economics; Public international law; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04903472869731897,"score_gpt":0.3004074239665645,"score_spread":0.25137269526924555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592092604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027992776,0.123276405,0.011471756,0.32159555,0.002691873,0.00009226943,0.000111629735,0.0001150763,0.5126526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84373695,0.03788153,0.007914063,0.06401202,0.0020926725,0.00011167265,0.00010238261,0.00008679724,0.04406198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988394,0.0067171245,0.000457958,0.00067532546,0.0027395177,0.0010159424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987326,0.006204931,0.0011686366,0.0011962941,0.0031446065,0.0009596148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021313963,0.0001995072,0.00038717096,0.0014319405,0.0021902963,0.013876073,0.00199364,0.0062528597,0.0029703535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015551318,0.00032456982,0.00043535512,0.0015140863,0.0076202145,0.0065325215,0.0042354953,0.0076763616,0.0006069674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036881581,0.000008754752,0.00011307952,0.00005527515,0.0000037729499,0.000054721124,0.0006140848,0.00020758301,0.00005979787,0.97817403,0.012776653,0.007928583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017210525,0.00004027087,0.0015947476,0.0010501011,0.000018871084,0.000117993775,0.0016493727,0.00081052835,0.00025278892,0.2321647,0.7622548,0.000028716464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015609249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020855984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021313963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065440433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0139122205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11272037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593397345","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000210","title":"A Network Anatomy of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Unobservable; China; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Globalization; Business; Economic system; Law and economics; Political science; Market economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.024545281156084536,"score_gpt":0.2780979417230577,"score_spread":0.2535526605669731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593397345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.577083,0.0015289782,0.042437922,0.004346682,0.00004788704,0.00014244497,0.00032871595,0.00011330253,0.37397105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98722446,0.00047811604,0.0024367273,0.00004639952,0.000013721782,0.000035090965,0.000073841446,0.0000057996326,0.009685872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995666,0.00013603934,0.000013819355,0.00009160394,0.00009329075,0.00009862737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994814,0.000174364,0.00011304574,0.000058428574,0.000099267774,0.00007357254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050464924,0.00010266476,0.00012658135,0.0022604838,0.0016106892,0.0027372115,0.00038789673,0.00045705252,0.0066220956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011660897,0.00012682081,0.00013626678,0.0026388944,0.0036730971,0.0035073294,0.0015388796,0.00030033334,0.00023905012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014409521,0.000005683073,0.0074465987,0.00002710286,0.000004882362,0.00029312546,0.008309475,0.0013131241,0.00043254424,0.96515065,0.001152266,0.015850136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023035493,0.00005686304,0.080461666,0.0001651135,0.000048728947,0.0010028656,0.020877747,0.03743073,0.0008365059,0.6515844,0.20747024,0.000042131633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019979736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015902624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019979736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033726802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015036409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039726913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599639032","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000616","title":"The ‘Development’ Discourse in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Odds; Developing country; International trade; Economics; Political science; Differential treatment; International economics; Law and economics; Law; Economic growth; Legislature","score_opus":0.04575689362627034,"score_gpt":0.38551164205016747,"score_spread":0.33975474842389713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599639032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027554369,0.063080475,0.012774555,0.24102159,0.001230529,0.000050755738,0.000045555335,0.000048961163,0.6541932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96319073,0.011180993,0.0016365316,0.012518673,0.00072236056,0.000053987445,0.000026447984,0.00003187839,0.010638447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96727777,0.026402432,0.0005706163,0.0010643083,0.0033365253,0.0013482665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97065073,0.024408013,0.0014639652,0.0007337729,0.0020654325,0.00067815697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03265343,0.00048574212,0.0005028445,0.0030113468,0.0077095954,0.01600012,0.0018635392,0.007007385,0.0029735747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018846551,0.0003089042,0.0002792229,0.0037768143,0.05471562,0.0090389,0.007232308,0.008510442,0.0003529258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023248494,0.0000048377833,0.00004519542,0.00003803259,0.0000011399701,0.00003759617,0.006308748,0.00009369148,0.000029637024,0.9885079,0.0025624258,0.0023684716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018066732,0.00002126874,0.00047650983,0.001093185,0.000008528686,0.00011094744,0.015175199,0.00047617097,0.00029111982,0.48552027,0.49679145,0.000017262066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071643284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044379705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03265343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015572568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012670322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17268991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612543568","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000246","title":"The Treatment of Chinese SOEs in China's WTO Protocol of Accession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Accession; China; Economic reform; State (computer science); Business; World trade; International trade; Point (geometry); State owned; Political science; Economics; Market economy; European union; Law","score_opus":0.07827721028724036,"score_gpt":0.3235017335491103,"score_spread":0.24522452326186997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612543568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31504515,0.034476012,0.0250282,0.17381486,0.008807808,0.0031011754,0.0021538178,0.00030882616,0.43726414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904817,0.006432918,0.008155611,0.038873672,0.001179131,0.0025291268,0.0008326597,0.00006490616,0.03711496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696555,0.013599611,0.003876528,0.0015833974,0.008695847,0.0025891094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794321,0.010023296,0.0022610917,0.002912751,0.0047941804,0.0005765605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055490494,0.00049149647,0.00082463573,0.00233773,0.0037770115,0.005190555,0.0021731001,0.0062762066,0.00278543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041790605,0.00047511057,0.0006507951,0.0032302774,0.005942742,0.0033155868,0.0033414247,0.005659962,0.00032487942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012934614,0.000056291996,0.0046640234,0.00052372355,0.00007111064,0.0005786398,0.004878874,0.0018182159,0.001472634,0.9147052,0.040816925,0.030284993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031342678,0.0003626174,0.055104993,0.0027253723,0.00035015206,0.00034999914,0.004477477,0.0063393367,0.0042148945,0.21841347,0.7069784,0.00036996268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035488263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024639128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055490494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009776072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034582842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29346532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726456532","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000155","title":"Firms’ Integration into Value Chains and Compliance with Adverse WTO Panel Rulings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Politics; Business; Control (management); Variation (astronomy); Panel data; Law and economics; International economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07154852034664955,"score_gpt":0.34156679115799204,"score_spread":0.2700182708113425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726456532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95970666,0.00063923135,0.0024313037,0.002861007,0.000031957723,0.00013974517,0.000114477436,0.00001740875,0.034058135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856985,0.000111834066,0.00024589105,0.00014072919,0.000023577742,0.000013762616,0.00004475285,0.0000023417417,0.0008472221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.969773,0.0125191435,0.002575022,0.0025532024,0.00856761,0.004012111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72446615,0.09879865,0.14841686,0.011386526,0.012800983,0.0041308464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027326407,0.00015514324,0.0004976824,0.0022740134,0.0023278664,0.0073680156,0.0011628832,0.0027580408,0.0048644943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1219741,0.0002537755,0.0004020839,0.0034609525,0.0046865665,0.0036017527,0.0028451262,0.003273317,0.0004413053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049676537,0.0008069737,0.83651006,0.00018745754,0.00037975196,0.0019046124,0.015410994,0.0075534903,0.0012800866,0.05847591,0.0036867934,0.0733071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000769275,0.0007159167,0.9084535,0.00043246162,0.00023014762,0.000853844,0.025696872,0.0073359557,0.0019305581,0.027802689,0.026310973,0.00016017462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01962521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020398427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027326407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044647753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038152968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14451754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760887835","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000350","title":"<i>China – Anti-dumping Measures on Imports of Cellulose Pulp from Canada</i> (<i>China–Cellulose Pulp</i>), DS483","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; China; Christian ministry; Duty; Business; Pulp (tooth); Cellulose; International trade; Pulp and paper industry; Agricultural economics; Economics; Engineering; Political science; Law; Medicine; Chemical engineering","score_opus":0.05328808047684993,"score_gpt":0.22747915774627503,"score_spread":0.1741910772694251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760887835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29641265,0.056930836,0.0025070214,0.026446458,0.0017710704,0.00047887355,0.012039828,0.0002344113,0.60317874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74451554,0.030170064,0.0038879344,0.01438979,0.00034906235,0.00017382197,0.005721882,0.00006676237,0.2007251],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803513,0.00015954394,0.00012180483,0.00014792246,0.001084276,0.00045133062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814665,0.0002516052,0.00027055072,0.00011288132,0.0011028709,0.00011543068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019123945,0.000374484,0.0002885671,0.0020018427,0.0021888774,0.001657942,0.0008563984,0.0017529416,0.0023412828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023641842,0.00020763688,0.00050729193,0.002513532,0.0010502352,0.0003863633,0.00040923475,0.0011488918,0.0003529228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071370107,0.00024361553,0.10092266,0.0035603165,0.0005405169,0.0037375477,0.0038906548,0.003113897,0.027056225,0.2316599,0.44785953,0.17670138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005795551,0.00021493118,0.19950502,0.0005891971,0.00029555574,0.00045141845,0.001404357,0.0007740692,0.022921745,0.0024682614,0.771213,0.00010455796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7238222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81777626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27617782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075571695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028693499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5556086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762616486","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000337","title":"<i>Canada – Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports of Certain Carbon Steel Welded Pipe from the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (Canada–Welded Pipe)</i>, DS483","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Welding; China; Carbon fibers; Business; International trade; Political science; Metallurgy; Law; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.02141157827600998,"score_gpt":0.26509996568630023,"score_spread":0.24368838741029025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762616486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04281944,0.14010622,0.0011125485,0.10204876,0.0042554005,0.00024869453,0.0076164855,0.00022620907,0.7015663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39681673,0.13991112,0.0022873734,0.14926969,0.0012872368,0.00030233353,0.0057747387,0.0001059057,0.30424488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733317,0.00016964882,0.00016654436,0.00018873207,0.001313924,0.00082800013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779475,0.00043357164,0.00022340854,0.00009170968,0.0013462277,0.00011041019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017007249,0.0005046252,0.00031186893,0.0020411285,0.0034567942,0.002811507,0.0018918999,0.0054137227,0.0035870485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037169645,0.00034279242,0.00070205063,0.0036466883,0.0022007748,0.0008102514,0.0007632574,0.002430484,0.0005954031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013532193,0.00006796982,0.0053480323,0.0019703775,0.000152063,0.0009934854,0.0022628235,0.00085452804,0.0031589197,0.2630064,0.67736167,0.044688493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000355571,0.00004212471,0.022488983,0.00087817374,0.00012646038,0.0001801129,0.0010028675,0.00016789025,0.0021915466,0.0028894073,0.9699478,0.000049197322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9253328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9493218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074667215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017685471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15021384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767498438","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000386","title":"<i>Eli Lilly and Company</i> v. <i>The Government of Canada</i>, Case No. UNCT/14/2","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Management; Plaintiff; Arbitration; Government (linguistics); Respondent; Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Business; Economics; Finance; Philosophy; Payment","score_opus":0.01886910478737266,"score_gpt":0.2249290009177557,"score_spread":0.20605989613038303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767498438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008044187,0.03377894,0.00025547735,0.17812261,0.0037680273,0.00022892065,0.001888347,0.0002226255,0.7736909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06710284,0.012576937,0.000374048,0.0824327,0.0007416134,0.00008497585,0.0009837382,0.0001026556,0.83560044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954953,0.00014695244,0.00012863462,0.0003133739,0.0018771007,0.0020385317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971861,0.0004582263,0.00018239363,0.00008948184,0.0015887098,0.00049504417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019452763,0.0005301898,0.0004596999,0.0018835353,0.0082324995,0.0067018755,0.001604371,0.008390001,0.026662195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005419618,0.000523732,0.00048590766,0.0024302318,0.0019170465,0.0011724533,0.0009692656,0.00572351,0.006355651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033144264,0.000018470517,0.0012039411,0.00007515677,0.000009478565,0.00038343258,0.00029947906,0.000065036686,0.00016246362,0.023150038,0.9659899,0.008609362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001579314,0.000011528575,0.0053027906,0.00019548504,0.000013044987,0.00010385548,0.0005884128,0.00009401827,0.0002549635,0.001090734,0.99230313,0.00002628644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9020225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9588815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09797752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0298665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06692205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21669763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799864725","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000593","title":"The Analogue Method Comes Unfastened – The Awkward Space between Market and Non-Market Economies in <i>EC–Fasteners (Article 21.5)</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; China; European union; People's Republic; Space (punctuation); Economics; International trade; Law and economics; Economy; International economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038497200710734585,"score_gpt":0.25383784343548793,"score_spread":0.21534064272475334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799864725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024635123,0.017226426,0.3066576,0.068927236,0.014118026,0.00017908502,0.0009869168,0.00062888896,0.5666407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80811095,0.009075313,0.078713536,0.016104497,0.0067227134,0.00033435452,0.00038614077,0.00090886373,0.07964363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899238,0.00607306,0.00035335697,0.0010497776,0.0023258193,0.00027427974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824194,0.010697428,0.00092973537,0.0033380755,0.0023617512,0.0002536101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092866095,0.00049234915,0.0009315344,0.0034187976,0.0020850026,0.009883686,0.0019250638,0.0022998883,0.023876062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042282004,0.0003870508,0.0010165457,0.0036986487,0.010390212,0.00888626,0.003069027,0.006763934,0.004799458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028438752,0.000009681243,0.0003387908,0.00004589346,0.000011856233,0.00005023049,0.00017606643,0.00035724265,0.00005744079,0.9626214,0.020777535,0.015525411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022120736,0.000048331658,0.0011024879,0.00038466442,0.00002914687,0.00020108656,0.00043933725,0.0031072123,0.00079059927,0.8125912,0.18123652,0.00004729475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004183837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004029172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023876062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023471923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015014132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07987344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811416109","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000435","title":"Learning about Digital Trade: Privacy and E-Commerce in CETA and TPP","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; European union; International trade; Free trade agreement; State (computer science); Member state; Personally identifiable information; Work (physics); Business; Political science; Free trade; Member states; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0409335125693818,"score_gpt":0.22697634828678914,"score_spread":0.18604283571740735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811416109","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015774734,0.902186,0.0006516126,0.052907366,0.0008573548,0.000007761697,0.00004478965,0.000007053423,0.041760717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06264677,0.91018575,0.00060243707,0.01639593,0.0022085863,0.000026139624,0.00009024808,0.000012391439,0.007831754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954573,0.0025243342,0.0002353158,0.00028452667,0.0011678971,0.00033064204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908546,0.0061071618,0.0007640161,0.00032697432,0.0015788137,0.00036851416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062991926,0.0002581501,0.000603169,0.0025809286,0.0010675229,0.007503515,0.0006625604,0.0035970923,0.00512924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008799606,0.00017220993,0.0004164562,0.0056454437,0.005214008,0.007811304,0.0023137862,0.0051032794,0.0006746552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004620592,0.000059763548,0.0005281013,0.0026534714,0.000042534586,0.00014823012,0.00088272593,0.00076959725,0.00014951885,0.7111028,0.05094026,0.23267674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001079153,0.00003865436,0.0020104959,0.007659851,0.00001818923,0.00019470186,0.0010551745,0.00019824988,0.00019931262,0.13664891,0.8519486,0.000017004619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0102091795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009357517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102091795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050482512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070893797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03662777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885667906","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000198","title":"What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; The Internet; International trade; Censorship; Reputation; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04026959468388808,"score_gpt":0.31927901638980544,"score_spread":0.27900942170591736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885667906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002148606,0.60159737,0.0023616261,0.3675939,0.0096527655,0.000015789456,0.00007409072,0.000017675982,0.016538177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1190242,0.72047997,0.002398211,0.13938153,0.015284732,0.00016481601,0.00012854382,0.00008317621,0.0030548365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96562284,0.02641036,0.0014929051,0.0017842236,0.0035651799,0.0011244868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9235286,0.05929187,0.0047894823,0.0017800875,0.0092504155,0.0013594857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029946767,0.0009231543,0.002238922,0.0077950023,0.0044236965,0.017810661,0.0026457163,0.0101771485,0.004121942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05762126,0.00059370446,0.00086399756,0.0105562005,0.0273085,0.029568309,0.0037334315,0.018732015,0.0013488914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066919856,0.000048424903,0.0015108398,0.0075008613,0.00017521445,0.00033929266,0.030782195,0.00036256143,0.00033011468,0.7485941,0.11427976,0.09600965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019658644,0.000044584987,0.0017788067,0.025701458,0.00007224308,0.00040686468,0.024696343,0.00011166905,0.00028548777,0.16792648,0.7788995,0.000057005116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007610748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004451157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029946767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007598124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078009157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1583755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924731061","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000459","title":"Trade Commitments and Data Flows: The National Security Wildcard","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; National security; European union; Focus (optics); Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.05944689069359935,"score_gpt":0.3562055709195979,"score_spread":0.2967586802259986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924731061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03187844,0.014756656,0.022723474,0.18594779,0.0016325177,0.000107667685,0.00083526975,0.0001083746,0.74200976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380602,0.010750338,0.0067249713,0.014917824,0.0013737244,0.00017177958,0.00025022333,0.00009271437,0.027658086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882449,0.0060086534,0.00056584936,0.0008925472,0.0036311382,0.00065686204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95459753,0.035469014,0.0031174284,0.0021070233,0.0039623133,0.00074660894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013136976,0.00029203334,0.0004847137,0.004106964,0.002545134,0.016150296,0.001125311,0.0050284998,0.016544197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045852564,0.0003710558,0.00037778122,0.006936066,0.0082595125,0.012855491,0.0041066264,0.005390038,0.00075626053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076182932,0.0000046253667,0.00030841163,0.00002530344,0.0000032820822,0.000023438688,0.000086883134,0.0004215815,0.000019788731,0.98745257,0.0044430355,0.0072035897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014499419,0.000023977562,0.0017472777,0.0010876909,0.000018689794,0.000091070935,0.0011181558,0.0030091067,0.0002073808,0.85370517,0.13893934,0.000037443653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008330475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008772128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016544197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00565315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006158535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06947583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2930275906","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000460","title":"Mapping the New Frontier of International IP Law: Introducing a TRIPs-plus Dataset","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Intellectual property; TRIPS Agreement; Frontier; Consistency (knowledge bases); Order (exchange); International trade; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.11453585366461645,"score_gpt":0.24742082652544484,"score_spread":0.1328849728608284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2930275906","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06384474,0.0020615947,0.008520657,0.0023643663,0.00024435687,0.0002558548,0.895137,0.0006280383,0.026943468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07640857,0.0009806831,0.013291039,0.0004459789,0.00016351111,0.0004977122,0.9041024,0.00016396581,0.003946229],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970693,0.00082845124,0.00041020577,0.000573847,0.0008781872,0.00024013569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98838633,0.003570543,0.0028731467,0.0021750012,0.0023586394,0.0006362902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002329444,0.00031895353,0.00042748472,0.009671239,0.00073183246,0.002999401,0.0009902224,0.0010328527,0.006912612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014667066,0.0002469099,0.00065350626,0.012448727,0.00054448016,0.0016874102,0.0026969535,0.001312009,0.00485836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019544856,0.00025978926,0.13110179,0.0015741637,0.0002651826,0.00059175683,0.0009763542,0.0078025134,0.0011017193,0.041738838,0.7462407,0.06815168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006570379,0.000046590467,0.10362425,0.00043722554,0.000055709243,0.00025249508,0.001281136,0.005481104,0.0007340822,0.008332207,0.8796299,0.000059589147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020817906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022882696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020817906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001065872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018174233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04139346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2931738767","doi":"10.1017/s147474561900003x","title":"<i>China–Cellulose Pulp</i>: China's Quest to Satisfy WTO Panels and the Appellate Body","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; China; Economics; World trade; Protectionism; International trade; International economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02451014471661456,"score_gpt":0.21485887981630014,"score_spread":0.19034873509968558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2931738767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26155093,0.06577666,0.004323675,0.3548397,0.004307184,0.0002573991,0.0014022073,0.00021519251,0.3073271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7982128,0.016670262,0.0033621106,0.08790591,0.0012280153,0.00014146978,0.00064451236,0.000076235025,0.09175849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621165,0.0007460948,0.00020891338,0.00037705156,0.001922476,0.00053382147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509937,0.0014502978,0.00075078936,0.0005360006,0.0018770933,0.00028640043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009641621,0.0002851428,0.00036581297,0.0011193543,0.0026968084,0.0050563794,0.00091200386,0.0032882688,0.0028199782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006514443,0.00020734881,0.00035301398,0.0029580041,0.0041263797,0.0016272903,0.0011567407,0.0033122306,0.00048772438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014098619,0.00006645897,0.029715654,0.0009805476,0.00015438268,0.0013437282,0.0064261686,0.0011830087,0.005805166,0.5756309,0.24926095,0.12929216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038509246,0.0001474578,0.08547264,0.00094630924,0.00009650085,0.00020762741,0.002981178,0.0011860761,0.004970182,0.022679271,0.88116956,0.00010476906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13254422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15329579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13254422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006827191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022639243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26354545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945768354","doi":"10.1017/s147474561900020x","title":"Three Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: The Conundrum of the US Steel and Aluminum Tariffs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; International trade; China; Member states; Political science; Business; International economics; European union; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015234872758322873,"score_gpt":0.2579629147767578,"score_spread":0.24272804201843495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945768354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03899298,0.04386735,0.0043732757,0.59818655,0.0052297795,0.00003462731,0.00016823785,0.0000656797,0.30908155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72468656,0.029125636,0.0026874857,0.21478648,0.0035281635,0.00008466409,0.00012954723,0.00010452964,0.024866898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98663205,0.005368252,0.0006983069,0.001049666,0.004938608,0.0013131727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818308,0.011367233,0.0012392707,0.001212448,0.003749091,0.00060116773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014276322,0.0003098439,0.0006937714,0.001946241,0.0063260733,0.01013209,0.0012058814,0.009528617,0.0037435687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018475598,0.00030878666,0.00085600506,0.0016003508,0.018247796,0.0076435297,0.0035530478,0.012031988,0.00070494495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017369197,0.000023196957,0.0007177179,0.000069962094,0.000019170655,0.00020828281,0.0013722251,0.00020918896,0.00010239292,0.9276741,0.048253614,0.02133283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002850645,0.00003575353,0.0020186119,0.0012868197,0.000047245638,0.0003154409,0.0033414061,0.0004792925,0.00046108232,0.57142925,0.4205085,0.000048043312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02701016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02856124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02701016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044814995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011300998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07550132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977486763","doi":"10.1017/s1474745619000351","title":"NAFTA 2.0: The Greenest Trade Agreement Ever?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade agreement; International trade; Agreement; Precautionary principle; Political science; Settlement (finance); Business; Free trade; Ecology","score_opus":0.09721664171755458,"score_gpt":0.26202189613413973,"score_spread":0.16480525441658517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977486763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01769044,0.06376112,0.0049803527,0.16892277,0.008107404,0.00009691149,0.004173513,0.00044660855,0.7318209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5568373,0.06597438,0.012595184,0.11618657,0.007068449,0.0007167299,0.009037321,0.0004631163,0.23112099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706346,0.0009045684,0.00014841132,0.0002763233,0.0012889311,0.00031825856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717283,0.0009824851,0.0003364046,0.0001607814,0.0011648678,0.00018268522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057822634,0.00033874344,0.00031635546,0.0018726821,0.0015363101,0.0063922717,0.0007210119,0.005350689,0.009483137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008438538,0.00023494421,0.0003438247,0.0024210277,0.001151648,0.0033585364,0.00091943186,0.0024390994,0.0024047513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046640343,0.000029993465,0.0007943594,0.0002488091,0.000014647679,0.00022407508,0.0003609523,0.00057527976,0.00039879032,0.69526273,0.2695682,0.03247558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011677593,0.000016610189,0.0011884548,0.00036646248,0.0000117166355,0.00007860212,0.00012930078,0.00020898011,0.00018318518,0.02602784,0.97176087,0.000016422877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027366785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022836365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97263324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003686721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070309583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054414988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995091733","doi":"10.1017/s147474562000004x","title":"Subsidy Determination, Benchmarks, and Adverse Inferences: Assessing ‘Benefit' in US–Coated Paper (Indonesia)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Respondent; Disadvantage; Business; Benchmarking; Public economics; Scope (computer science); Government (linguistics); Margin (machine learning); Natural resource; Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Marketing; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.08018024355736121,"score_gpt":0.25120546296538154,"score_spread":0.17102521940802035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995091733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7989486,0.0023889085,0.016325848,0.003543433,0.00020351804,0.00037557312,0.0012213208,0.000058808935,0.1769339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992963,0.00035160742,0.0032347403,0.0003453265,0.000049573315,0.00006353392,0.00040858926,0.000013159407,0.00257042],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97235066,0.011641131,0.0019386653,0.0013651112,0.011577873,0.0011266083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8512379,0.09174833,0.023406114,0.008179399,0.023966208,0.0014621298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0344424,0.00022997109,0.00065022573,0.0030220712,0.0010000765,0.0046614707,0.0010342558,0.0010696566,0.003981338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10805556,0.00022699704,0.00040172297,0.0038749122,0.002092418,0.0024419692,0.0023929132,0.0017552259,0.0005473838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016113754,0.0007005278,0.5329902,0.0009958767,0.0004344898,0.0013062413,0.005346536,0.017644092,0.0017229884,0.24391742,0.018546956,0.17478338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012377035,0.0010295254,0.7052029,0.0017868874,0.00066889776,0.0007321108,0.011316479,0.046208963,0.010837788,0.12692438,0.09499492,0.00017350707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008390965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009074192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0344424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002548247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024675557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18215096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995581391","doi":"10.1017/s1474745620000075","title":"Baptists and Bootleggers in the Biodiesel Trade: <i>EU–Biodiesel (Indonesia)</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Oil Palm Production and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; International trade; Biodiesel; Subsidy; Business; Domestic market; International economics; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.02235594337336267,"score_gpt":0.24844128122566725,"score_spread":0.22608533785230459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995581391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30279806,0.0027258531,0.0010614907,0.035104696,0.00057066494,0.000047640675,0.00004567516,0.000020128575,0.65762585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91951,0.0006877999,0.0003119336,0.009453223,0.00009220045,0.000022191824,0.000020631918,0.000031039035,0.06987105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749434,0.0007449162,0.000086361826,0.00040283924,0.0003422942,0.00092927256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984926,0.00077910535,0.00021616938,0.00013136768,0.00012782,0.0002529572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028719408,0.0002661308,0.00035480672,0.00053918635,0.009818412,0.010024368,0.0009938485,0.009165711,0.010313852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033377018,0.00036936667,0.00034014144,0.00094687357,0.009193872,0.004126842,0.0051313546,0.008688479,0.00078556564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010460812,0.00014091443,0.0049733394,0.00007167307,0.000013629263,0.0047589475,0.027165843,0.00031325102,0.00096546,0.9231231,0.022375291,0.015993789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006801584,0.0000763336,0.020798348,0.00058790576,0.000028453145,0.0011706987,0.08872956,0.0010242566,0.0028271328,0.0796245,0.80497605,0.00008868849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01319252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024248337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01319252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035447597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017939592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03450322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034688245","doi":"10.1017/s1474745620000245","title":"<i>United States – Countervailing Measures on Supercalendered Paper from Canada</i>, DS505","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Duty; Relation (database); Political science; Measure (data warehouse); International trade; Business; Public economics; Economics; Law; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.04383543832170432,"score_gpt":0.27023843796459535,"score_spread":0.226402999642891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034688245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015452068,0.011409928,0.0009996133,0.04703345,0.002568952,0.00036856084,0.003597165,0.00030667568,0.9182636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14643452,0.008942479,0.0021287429,0.13708,0.00083211856,0.00036531498,0.0019678576,0.00019899826,0.70205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028873,0.0004168189,0.0005026379,0.0009878206,0.0058955206,0.0019084825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400556,0.0015507808,0.00028244028,0.00047467405,0.0033102622,0.0003761988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033969579,0.0006972938,0.0004823062,0.0026572517,0.010628065,0.010099793,0.0032242276,0.017551582,0.012696226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087603275,0.000715425,0.0009965312,0.002917296,0.004232162,0.0019362043,0.0017730566,0.006155745,0.0028882886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066452085,0.00006783529,0.0019914382,0.00022780742,0.000035816498,0.0010326526,0.0015867398,0.00035506592,0.0022778993,0.2619953,0.70912427,0.021238849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019025687,0.000026461144,0.0049369643,0.00025355056,0.00002577332,0.00012884388,0.00064322486,0.00016786404,0.0013850066,0.0029548188,0.9893965,0.00006193562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.925123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9576032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07487702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03257168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07210959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2363252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049361211","doi":"10.1017/s147474562000035x","title":"Introducing the Electronic Database of Investment Treaties (EDIT): The Genesis of a New Database and Its Use","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Database; Computer science; Electronic database; Investment (military); Intelligent database; Information retrieval; Politics; Database design; Database schema; Political science; Database testing; Law","score_opus":0.0511446422888861,"score_gpt":0.25453318599440156,"score_spread":0.20338854370551546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049361211","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022119898,0.017466543,0.4746571,0.072636016,0.013342007,0.0012691194,0.1486476,0.019018447,0.23084322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15726711,0.016537562,0.62898755,0.014388148,0.008843597,0.0016120961,0.10662359,0.008336326,0.057404093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885434,0.0040662754,0.0022379109,0.0012083681,0.0035878937,0.00035612474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9376633,0.027907427,0.005123399,0.017016996,0.009940971,0.0023479345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012285848,0.0003306681,0.0007765145,0.012027573,0.0016013836,0.015173551,0.0016446421,0.00189466,0.019947512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060469452,0.0006740135,0.00056618644,0.017091982,0.0021134082,0.017813856,0.006156953,0.0033071497,0.0087383725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001395044,0.00006477492,0.003395001,0.0007276526,0.00003570612,0.000234227,0.0020031938,0.0010865303,0.0012092775,0.37555343,0.31250152,0.30304924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011623504,0.000012313158,0.0006914955,0.00025439,0.0000074345676,0.00013043574,0.0002815782,0.00050161855,0.00043791806,0.015798751,0.9818392,0.000033318654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003119221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020859751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019947512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019599549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037067828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066731036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086891586","doi":"10.1017/s1474745620000269","title":"Western Europe's Long Retreat from Coal and Implications for Energy Trade","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Coal; Subsidy; Economics; Industrialisation; Competition (biology); Coal mining; Natural resource economics; Unemployment; International trade; Fossil fuel; Business; Economy; Economic policy; Market economy; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.03215624309566719,"score_gpt":0.24025814360132167,"score_spread":0.20810190050565447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086891586","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007956986,0.9699637,0.00006175572,0.0063397554,0.0005139374,0.0000030275176,0.00005408214,0.000003914605,0.015102845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.090572715,0.8966568,0.0001791432,0.0063979737,0.0008255474,0.000009411342,0.0001461186,0.000007486215,0.0052047586],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966204,0.00010262288,0.000038502265,0.000052228173,0.00009069895,0.000053887303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994492,0.0001570265,0.00015744907,0.000019280496,0.00018015748,0.000036892292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013967999,0.00019236942,0.0002613455,0.0010488669,0.00028992663,0.0020772931,0.00023062697,0.00085660396,0.00205539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009035286,0.00008022643,0.00025944726,0.0028370952,0.00065571227,0.0008243914,0.00058006385,0.0007329751,0.000364706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028555692,0.000080539496,0.004563487,0.009655998,0.00026382005,0.0009934016,0.0016053213,0.00080578955,0.0014907847,0.06709439,0.07985243,0.8333086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001602653,0.00008239133,0.022113798,0.0064986954,0.0000813788,0.00047456275,0.0012840546,0.00005130549,0.00032248007,0.0035622295,0.965502,0.000011132964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015473844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015870493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015473844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010592974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018308939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03076756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088788269","doi":"10.1017/s1474745620000385","title":"<i>Mi casa es tu casa</i>? The Limits of Inter-systemic Dispute Resolution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Government (linguistics); Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Agreement; Legal culture; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05220505218201862,"score_gpt":0.2608742738053493,"score_spread":0.20866922162333065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088788269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29181218,0.013988664,0.010213304,0.13515958,0.0002513655,0.00007673892,0.000109982364,0.00005591064,0.5483322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233633,0.0011966121,0.000920908,0.0021368589,0.0001309012,0.000056788027,0.000016614056,0.00000913473,0.0031958702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97892624,0.013475763,0.00044468936,0.0016185116,0.0033865124,0.0021482198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604466,0.025915453,0.0036656144,0.0035076884,0.005111002,0.001353582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020519381,0.00016831956,0.00041487796,0.0019660934,0.00476978,0.011513867,0.0013233986,0.0026390585,0.0065429155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040001042,0.00023867183,0.00026827227,0.001330187,0.013090336,0.00791158,0.0041340054,0.0030008499,0.00046183518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006701457,0.0000509028,0.008947448,0.00011431404,0.000020628015,0.0002889511,0.01894172,0.0005190768,0.00044574257,0.9141768,0.010228899,0.046198484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004563995,0.00009421477,0.029735582,0.0019135197,0.000069565474,0.0005467205,0.06635423,0.0032869524,0.0014588567,0.52536833,0.37105873,0.0000676604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02083006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014669664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02083006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007029733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004732338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10851812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121279842","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000226","title":"Shining a light on fossil fuel subsidies at the WTO: how NGOs can contribute to WTO notification and surveillance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Business; Fossil fuel; International trade; International economics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.020316713702025285,"score_gpt":0.2757966118780876,"score_spread":0.2554798981760623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121279842","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010592515,0.02522007,0.016905326,0.8404204,0.0050713588,0.00047733303,0.00017932983,0.00024206421,0.100891516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6728778,0.035636906,0.039965924,0.21198986,0.0067469617,0.0012811502,0.00028774666,0.000326709,0.030886928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8505759,0.11317859,0.0053319223,0.0038943258,0.019842364,0.0071768328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.556956,0.3657742,0.011837695,0.011556062,0.04730303,0.006572961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23620136,0.00068053266,0.001014829,0.009389614,0.0064396705,0.024252199,0.0037829892,0.016339002,0.0054796175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29666826,0.0007557966,0.0010822312,0.004355528,0.01764215,0.018707069,0.0092100175,0.012400889,0.0010152381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006390731,0.00012611314,0.0061550266,0.0010885217,0.000068723966,0.000515045,0.010169048,0.0018451272,0.000494389,0.65056443,0.186916,0.14199373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009924519,0.0001303433,0.004988925,0.008233077,0.000117750744,0.00019467527,0.01214354,0.003476065,0.0010864008,0.2767465,0.69260544,0.0001780357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03236244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025300348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23620136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013098932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043302126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9418997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121914165","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000379","title":"Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Enforcement; Normative; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Product (mathematics); Bargaining power; Power (physics); Economics; Business; International trade; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011987065633718732,"score_gpt":0.3094595024585622,"score_spread":0.2974724368248435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121914165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00922824,0.12863539,0.016936526,0.6426182,0.008906511,0.000064817476,0.00015505457,0.00011718898,0.1933381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62091243,0.07203724,0.010794485,0.24098304,0.011722847,0.00024730442,0.00023378298,0.00028098456,0.04278787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9491306,0.028805379,0.0025622672,0.0034431526,0.014522548,0.0015360201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9397517,0.035833694,0.005459287,0.0071316534,0.010887241,0.0009364454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042695753,0.0005289173,0.0009439025,0.0023291118,0.002291399,0.012816965,0.0025554844,0.015620329,0.0033920004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05729923,0.0003688223,0.0009710311,0.0025137449,0.025252052,0.013252577,0.00357075,0.016864503,0.0009355449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000766324,0.0000116764895,0.000104938794,0.000117371856,0.000012789222,0.00003286294,0.0004767876,0.00018271845,0.00007022028,0.97181183,0.016949005,0.01022201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023233517,0.000027323087,0.00044483348,0.0018205754,0.00002108077,0.00008081871,0.0006820315,0.00038417266,0.00022562862,0.6580964,0.33816826,0.000025813728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008222251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044207955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042695753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064147557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009720435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22579938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123111527","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000496","title":"The Effect of Binding Commitments on Services Trade","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Restrictiveness; Market access; Trade barrier; International economics; Gravity model of trade; Trade in services; International trade; Free trade; Business; Index (typography); Bilateral trade; Economics; Geography; China; Computer science","score_opus":0.03266053105939871,"score_gpt":0.23620527776132427,"score_spread":0.20354474670192557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123111527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9463867,0.0032768059,0.0052087484,0.004276511,0.00015218907,0.00006300266,0.0018428519,0.00016492246,0.03862818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963595,0.00071501004,0.00025684328,0.00015624354,0.00005178735,0.000016670934,0.00051947194,0.000012279757,0.0019121389],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471843,0.0023287935,0.0002413046,0.00039675776,0.0014537361,0.0008608885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97250575,0.014739417,0.008486925,0.0011713424,0.0023199285,0.0007766952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004653599,0.00041079763,0.0007137875,0.0012688809,0.00039237866,0.0021277932,0.00079260103,0.0008327338,0.008607252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023121858,0.00020793463,0.0013857253,0.0023169145,0.0015989724,0.0011672943,0.0018774522,0.0023701007,0.0008210787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021269703,0.00090303563,0.45459765,0.0015615284,0.0028126298,0.0009928627,0.0012529381,0.29873192,0.0071438146,0.106457144,0.014179493,0.10923999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020765595,0.001436634,0.8289404,0.00049761706,0.0013634622,0.0002355354,0.0034916431,0.06883871,0.008617539,0.042762633,0.043429594,0.000178639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03158619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01523762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03158619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022206043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019542908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0628047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123846870","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000063","title":"<i>Canada–Renewable Energy:</i> Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So-Green Subsidies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Tariff; Renewable energy; Tribunal; Jurisprudence; Arbitration; Government (linguistics); Investment (military); Electricity; European union; Feed-in tariff; Economics; Business; Treaty; International economics; International trade; Law; Energy policy; Market economy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.1738962244624373,"score_gpt":0.2777504323982687,"score_spread":0.10385420793583139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123846870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01955233,0.030230451,0.0022432646,0.4252658,0.0022781235,0.00011500052,0.001841497,0.00013983053,0.51833373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.545198,0.028177666,0.004727055,0.24767365,0.0016332667,0.00019301056,0.00074536324,0.0001310745,0.17152087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320763,0.0006592987,0.00020036113,0.00046736255,0.0039373785,0.0015279362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922097,0.002303988,0.00036657878,0.00030748695,0.004218278,0.0005940037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046731737,0.00033122714,0.0005130018,0.002249131,0.0077586044,0.009391489,0.0024757548,0.009168686,0.006885776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009795117,0.00033876832,0.0007149247,0.0035206235,0.007850903,0.002379452,0.00133357,0.005681765,0.0006153009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002693096,0.000021559217,0.00070177077,0.000121001154,0.000017132015,0.0002178754,0.0007228507,0.0008204469,0.0002894937,0.8382546,0.15035078,0.008455608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005427174,0.000021467375,0.007244659,0.0010122509,0.000048847105,0.00008536091,0.0012780805,0.0015730985,0.00050164683,0.10351458,0.8845542,0.00011154034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97792155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98223674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074543685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074543685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13931304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5408548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123850535","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000051","title":"<i>EC–Seal Products</i>: Seals and Sensibilities (TBT Aspects of the Panel and Appellate Body Reports)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Seal (emblem); European union; Interpretation (philosophy); International trade; Technical barriers to trade; Panel discussion; Product (mathematics); Business; Political science; Law; Advertising; Trade barrier; History","score_opus":0.050788058090425595,"score_gpt":0.2896381989919127,"score_spread":0.2388501409014871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123850535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011619399,0.050255693,0.0016013124,0.11233212,0.0037270389,0.00019695511,0.0014104195,0.00011208324,0.81874496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39357376,0.041424062,0.002989004,0.25479496,0.004421554,0.000482972,0.0013458827,0.00020743367,0.3007604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899693,0.0024575593,0.0007178076,0.0010935327,0.0043632793,0.0013985215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98816854,0.0064966925,0.0012165701,0.00067145226,0.0031724237,0.00027427165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116016315,0.00043182535,0.0005077982,0.0020218347,0.003369963,0.009883387,0.001981767,0.020769432,0.0072551593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01569097,0.0006424849,0.0008724482,0.002869731,0.0047634146,0.0027535523,0.0014416195,0.0062445845,0.0030606557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045798213,0.00007964554,0.0012404491,0.00067683664,0.00003938666,0.0010984908,0.0019621532,0.0003828782,0.0016418084,0.35896134,0.61400396,0.019867305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016074822,0.000046906174,0.005328697,0.0012049938,0.00004112706,0.00023141508,0.00077312975,0.0001454728,0.0012730773,0.01142833,0.979451,0.00005977347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114302285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10144084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114302285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005617258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009274255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22727394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124062783","doi":"10.1017/s1474745609990048","title":"The special safeguard fiasco in the WTO: the perils of inadequate analysis and negotiation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguard; Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); Swift; Political science; Modalities; Work (physics); Law and economics; Agriculture; Fidelity; International trade; Business; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Social science; History; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.015159553823401147,"score_gpt":0.30230950483186964,"score_spread":0.28714995100846846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124062783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020395784,0.012547711,0.019335281,0.8560122,0.0049573635,0.00007663567,0.000076282464,0.00012719947,0.086471476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80192983,0.0078238845,0.015716515,0.1419462,0.0050381455,0.00044665177,0.00011495901,0.0005056861,0.026478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87997067,0.087893136,0.003113428,0.0045773704,0.020459719,0.0039857025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85569245,0.120686874,0.0048392904,0.006777908,0.008808764,0.0031947696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11457558,0.00063939433,0.0009326396,0.0020769264,0.010827985,0.02781792,0.0038131424,0.015883708,0.0041923304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14762402,0.000920247,0.00061422517,0.0026437028,0.04400916,0.022110216,0.009485099,0.026251378,0.0010561921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030490975,0.000016345331,0.00013187694,0.00007043457,0.000006744366,0.00008944028,0.0059934515,0.00050726923,0.00015317203,0.9535027,0.030560272,0.008937799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001872017,0.000018333454,0.0004027898,0.001114711,0.000007391944,0.00009990028,0.010271521,0.0023897232,0.00033989016,0.669774,0.31549916,0.00006381477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009840936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057570715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11457558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017474918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017500954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6059408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124634965","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000026","title":"‘The wide and the narrow gate’: Benchmarking in the SCM Agreement after the<i>Canada–Renewable Energy/FIT</i>Ruling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Subsidy; European court of justice; Status quo; Normalization (sociology); Ethos; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; European union; Economics; European Union law; Sociology; Marketing; International trade","score_opus":0.02206361008178235,"score_gpt":0.22026214017722456,"score_spread":0.19819853009544222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124634965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082420014,0.021977631,0.0077628074,0.23038112,0.002288966,0.00018159827,0.00041663233,0.00010492795,0.6544663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8530054,0.0041932724,0.0025065804,0.057961777,0.0004240574,0.000071367904,0.00014476769,0.00006101004,0.0816317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885046,0.0024965734,0.00028212176,0.0008616082,0.0047207754,0.0031344146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99312043,0.0031316206,0.0002895465,0.00035802193,0.0025060326,0.0005942729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012877735,0.00023341409,0.0005626863,0.0013861887,0.008887066,0.012889319,0.0015897176,0.0092786895,0.0034616431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017218618,0.00021410792,0.00044439945,0.0022154492,0.009306073,0.003145387,0.0025729353,0.006638238,0.00040475672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026915372,0.000014407943,0.00077929464,0.0000599119,0.000007726799,0.0005499647,0.0018119904,0.00070545153,0.00037800975,0.9362924,0.043698277,0.015675712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003044745,0.000074064155,0.007857805,0.0009575473,0.000049895705,0.0002207801,0.0071092667,0.0028976735,0.0029590044,0.19244535,0.78520346,0.00019473856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68805695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77933955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31194305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037553772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05891896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62756026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124860597","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000725","title":"<i>EC–Seal Products</i>: The Tension between Public Morals and International Trade Agreements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Seal (emblem); International trade; Free trade; Liberalization; Indigenous; Business; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.07550056071203612,"score_gpt":0.32890978556166695,"score_spread":0.2534092248496308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124860597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0117773805,0.16385163,0.0021609694,0.30857038,0.0023149042,0.000024206427,0.00012846077,0.000038164115,0.51113385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6494473,0.12330739,0.00202918,0.16419621,0.004920369,0.00009483337,0.00015718579,0.00008520213,0.055762343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897349,0.0048120446,0.00042288282,0.00077795226,0.0031851933,0.0010670816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875102,0.007889129,0.000955296,0.00068857084,0.0026294114,0.00032742642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137966825,0.00021684571,0.000606067,0.001527949,0.002577359,0.0118977055,0.0011628164,0.010984876,0.0044714184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012370821,0.00024681035,0.00055976055,0.002596264,0.010797262,0.005156386,0.0017230641,0.006965877,0.0009445926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008238734,0.000019182686,0.00019916243,0.00017480657,0.000008258636,0.00012455485,0.0008517832,0.00015195223,0.00011546486,0.91976863,0.06148089,0.01709713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012380038,0.000028992592,0.0023257276,0.0021293438,0.000019898685,0.0001837002,0.0022185256,0.00029592586,0.0003817255,0.16294448,0.82942843,0.000030798707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030737389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01973135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030737389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007534408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009222728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07296473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125641524","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000342","title":"First Diagnose, Then Treat: What Ails the Doha Round?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; International trade; Blame; Commodity; International economics; China; Corporate governance; World trade; Economics; Political science; Business; Market economy; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.157992342439702,"score_gpt":0.25044350504150825,"score_spread":0.09245116260180625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125641524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026617863,0.034636565,0.0049610008,0.8993723,0.010845624,0.000044836008,0.00012460208,0.000084420695,0.0472689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.388501,0.08737519,0.010252701,0.38157156,0.019975431,0.0003428726,0.00043942948,0.00054299575,0.110998906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991861,0.0042142565,0.00022885784,0.0007109168,0.0015850669,0.0013998388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986591,0.003829538,0.0011105584,0.00093890954,0.0049591684,0.0025708256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015961722,0.000584351,0.0009750331,0.0013997835,0.005192653,0.015919937,0.0021899003,0.0070460117,0.02274761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031475183,0.00043989555,0.00050400797,0.001153219,0.010795754,0.016438043,0.004365345,0.011839541,0.008134025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111166766,0.00006872386,0.0020450081,0.0006002584,0.000047792993,0.00020714971,0.003408212,0.0002826418,0.00026166593,0.59564954,0.30870843,0.088609435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028917404,0.00004715122,0.0010917244,0.0018835542,0.000029135364,0.00017517836,0.008445381,0.00039377183,0.00032229727,0.2648223,0.72270465,0.000055830675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015879968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022840822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02274761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091811055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021403387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08441466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169262379","doi":"10.1017/s1474745621000112","title":"Fishy SPS Measures? The WTO's <i>Korea – Radionuclides</i> Dispute","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Panel data; Power (physics); Law; International trade; Political science; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.030696062913024416,"score_gpt":0.2994102962882449,"score_spread":0.2687142333752205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169262379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10800043,0.012758745,0.0037940117,0.21952124,0.0021649275,0.00012737267,0.00025349951,0.00006941663,0.65331036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8344687,0.0042296797,0.0014742047,0.118976936,0.0007903329,0.000081548336,0.00010158741,0.000043609693,0.039833322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920815,0.002862447,0.0007490752,0.0009434574,0.0017962379,0.0015672835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99071056,0.0051933723,0.0011824408,0.00070536765,0.0017969481,0.00041132822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016400956,0.00035490328,0.00047821473,0.0010563441,0.0041276007,0.009782716,0.001841431,0.014015753,0.004730405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013045829,0.0004146346,0.0008957693,0.0012831789,0.0064669633,0.0049637994,0.0022611325,0.008223562,0.0011274382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060810806,0.000051331535,0.00232876,0.00021637905,0.000047680765,0.0019627346,0.002238192,0.00049039413,0.0018323398,0.90964913,0.066708185,0.014414091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086369975,0.00018397448,0.0095612565,0.0015831583,0.00017782662,0.0009540279,0.008932513,0.0013503543,0.0037947237,0.1590317,0.8141583,0.00018567752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022877062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027454156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022877062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004596413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008073795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08673751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186875561","doi":"10.1017/s1474745621000240","title":"‘Two Roads Diverged in [Soft]wood’ Targeted Dumping, Differential Pricing Methodology, and Zeroing: <i>US – Canada Anti-Dumping in Softwood Lumber</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Subsidy; Appeal; Differential (mechanical device); Dumping; Economics; International trade; Law; Political science; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Market economy","score_opus":0.07497975567652673,"score_gpt":0.2517673223188151,"score_spread":0.17678756664228837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186875561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14495249,0.15617056,0.013310092,0.25448012,0.003965683,0.00012619354,0.0009972297,0.0001112879,0.42588642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89249456,0.031344734,0.004509743,0.03915634,0.0006021411,0.00003464237,0.00043573743,0.00007429109,0.031347673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915599,0.0023975067,0.00026656294,0.0006957127,0.0040831044,0.0009972226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98143595,0.008520132,0.001034699,0.0007792484,0.007740283,0.0004897258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014684828,0.00016923092,0.00042085795,0.001727592,0.002622391,0.0071001183,0.0016746633,0.0028993066,0.0029951108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017874427,0.00016735613,0.00037401606,0.0030553027,0.007537122,0.0020318753,0.0009328168,0.00300382,0.00038043107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001534538,0.000048473845,0.006216018,0.00073212833,0.00008705486,0.00034204044,0.0028483726,0.001205495,0.00079554884,0.765168,0.10466198,0.11774151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045052817,0.000092090406,0.04218639,0.003355043,0.00021851716,0.00022911894,0.007112196,0.0018310986,0.0035430465,0.12677366,0.8144813,0.00013241229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5552456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6425538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44475442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01642824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02270356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8947473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192412830","doi":"10.1017/s1474745621000239","title":"Labour Rights Protection and Its Enforcement under the USMCA: Insights from a Comparative Legal Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Economics; Business; International economics; Law","score_opus":0.06255573799402164,"score_gpt":0.3461306657811071,"score_spread":0.2835749277870855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192412830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26722586,0.013108642,0.0054039354,0.01653309,0.00009817595,0.000102339596,0.00031895752,0.000019936582,0.6971891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98800486,0.0026233727,0.0014709949,0.00074701756,0.00005747919,0.00006665464,0.00007202565,0.000010941363,0.0069466797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430084,0.0027594178,0.00013963543,0.00045420817,0.0015018182,0.0008440963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98974156,0.0069628176,0.0009146425,0.0004495477,0.0017278236,0.00020360359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00863592,0.00012926756,0.00043864688,0.003565791,0.0054108994,0.0070355176,0.001274886,0.0022493405,0.0066829803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123315705,0.00016962767,0.00030667958,0.0056888056,0.008485504,0.0032695928,0.0027661566,0.002537314,0.0002382637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010902945,0.000015927088,0.0011248962,0.000038238446,0.0000058879614,0.00009641174,0.00329499,0.00028597369,0.0000599047,0.9881743,0.0013461134,0.005546455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006174482,0.00016150375,0.056448076,0.003240904,0.00017859692,0.00043406835,0.06310465,0.005695587,0.0010864054,0.44495705,0.424537,0.00009432792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14778237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17133927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14778237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017644199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013397072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2938444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220889505","doi":"10.1017/s1474745622000076","title":"Counterfactuals and Contingency in WTO Dispute Settlement History","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Dispute resolution; Settlement (finance); Scholarship; Law and economics; Hindsight bias; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.028681640633259464,"score_gpt":0.29039548141271654,"score_spread":0.2617138407794571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220889505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19851369,0.05292933,0.13051268,0.10388672,0.0024373226,0.00021669282,0.0006430278,0.00021199536,0.51064855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901697,0.0025696128,0.0033505855,0.001154004,0.00039740262,0.00005417688,0.00006728752,0.000021198373,0.0022159317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.977201,0.014998114,0.0015503961,0.002590719,0.0026976233,0.00096219254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8575155,0.120927006,0.0088305,0.0074328994,0.004421522,0.00087258767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040869214,0.0002882869,0.00080219674,0.005086068,0.0041981814,0.010022821,0.0023176377,0.0059012896,0.008449006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10131082,0.0005739171,0.00064026145,0.0042780275,0.024079926,0.013742309,0.0043657054,0.0063737724,0.00046444655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015020948,0.00000541412,0.0005276848,0.00003177446,0.0000130826,0.00008609536,0.0005823968,0.00088257424,0.000016175572,0.9933115,0.0009650047,0.00356332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109398825,0.000009475673,0.0008206121,0.00015402459,0.000009559022,0.00007908102,0.00050129305,0.0026065402,0.00006775276,0.9824362,0.013286669,0.000017926297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004920376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035778128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040869214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059880507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002580682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21613967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239713843","doi":"10.1017/s1474745603001137","title":"Canada – Dairy: Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Subsidy; International trade; World trade; Business; Agreement on Agriculture; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; International economics; Agricultural science; Economics; Geography; Market economy; Biology","score_opus":0.041689024061595914,"score_gpt":0.20293163768157707,"score_spread":0.16124261361998116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239713843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045598004,0.13205476,0.00558322,0.14918202,0.007945848,0.00037890638,0.010655433,0.00043295787,0.64816886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48425192,0.08194345,0.012712809,0.10423511,0.0021992947,0.00028697963,0.00665355,0.00039970747,0.30731714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99111396,0.00044794648,0.000273636,0.0004940047,0.0063947984,0.0012757716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432474,0.000662387,0.00046370944,0.00014492607,0.0040428685,0.000361334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027048138,0.0005644953,0.00041169793,0.002867726,0.004925176,0.0049272706,0.0020550087,0.003585873,0.005195467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060301917,0.00035489822,0.0005428513,0.0048311385,0.002706142,0.001247261,0.0011911064,0.0030949088,0.0005550814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026332325,0.00009309707,0.010169391,0.0010829679,0.000105847124,0.00073551404,0.0018441943,0.0018606023,0.0035869773,0.43394303,0.4631587,0.08315628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002075684,0.00001838754,0.013396032,0.00021279705,0.000041452575,0.000084982996,0.0004189869,0.0001963239,0.0012360173,0.0033732764,0.98095196,0.000048989554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97692025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053899426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053899426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15342467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39106953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296058460","doi":"10.1017/s1474745622000313","title":"Energy in International Trade Law: Concepts, Regulation and Changing Markets by Anna-Alexandra Marhold Cambridge University Press, 2021: 9781108551526","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; Economics; Political science; Law and economics; International trade","score_opus":0.012737254959595587,"score_gpt":0.2505463824551511,"score_spread":0.2378091274955555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296058460","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005012721,0.718553,0.0010024275,0.12169577,0.0045658606,0.000014574485,0.00018767225,0.00006289411,0.15341651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031567223,0.69760233,0.0012880171,0.020546993,0.006438723,0.00009091249,0.0003111703,0.000118582866,0.24203603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864906,0.00042436522,0.00007790097,0.0001546916,0.0006097487,0.00008426365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880886,0.00066123967,0.0001101684,0.000072599,0.00029372974,0.000053485117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015777481,0.0006471817,0.00044555447,0.0023279442,0.0011304397,0.0057728635,0.00067518523,0.0042646,0.019499274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040275897,0.00046606906,0.0003581376,0.0038315463,0.0027689727,0.0057989624,0.001450443,0.004681767,0.007747116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010715811,0.000012144179,0.000121588455,0.00031638244,0.0000069035277,0.000036660673,0.00022332977,0.00028523587,0.00011595789,0.2220302,0.7099183,0.06692259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002809252,0.000003934556,0.00035394734,0.00080450746,0.0000035326357,0.00003653915,0.00012411474,0.000116419666,0.00003785011,0.039849073,0.95866024,0.0000069546763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011459345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02010728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019499274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037842025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038611344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06523156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306155942","doi":"10.1017/s1474745622000325","title":"‘An Introduction to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: Understanding the New NAFTA’ by David Gantz Edward Elgar Publishing: 2020, ISBN 9781839105319","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Relations in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Political science; Regional science; Economic history; Economic geography; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.029818662607234078,"score_gpt":0.3085265642226627,"score_spread":0.27870790161542863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306155942","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046827487,0.7682844,0.0005157138,0.1811572,0.010247092,0.000029523771,0.00068524835,0.00003566249,0.03857692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028305445,0.84670764,0.0028227968,0.035064157,0.006203477,0.000115542396,0.0012038002,0.000104444385,0.07947263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988273,0.00038957995,0.00006180885,0.00011603227,0.00042628875,0.00017903192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985568,0.0005839917,0.000082233,0.000033350625,0.00061773055,0.00012592098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00258373,0.0008776058,0.0005628995,0.0042540357,0.003755995,0.0059606927,0.001205697,0.00317881,0.012780515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037637164,0.00045855125,0.00039507172,0.006963034,0.0038270403,0.0070135687,0.0015390166,0.0045710257,0.0017191187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002074006,0.000008498279,0.0003258766,0.00060391106,0.0000095194555,0.00008776473,0.0020953373,0.0001529236,0.000111417816,0.10057552,0.8496001,0.04640831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024287401,0.0000025475806,0.0009208135,0.0011053703,0.000003225146,0.00003762634,0.000980983,0.000024883771,0.000022712531,0.0064772367,0.9904131,0.00000911807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59597856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76153624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40402144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02427029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026337324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8128016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386441394","doi":"10.1017/s1474745623000058","title":"The Economic Interest Test in UK Trade Remedy Investigations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Test (biology); European union; Economic integration; International economics; Stakeholder; Trade barrier; Trade union; Single market; Business; Economics; World trade; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21627981031233132,"score_gpt":0.27157884704308366,"score_spread":0.05529903673075234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386441394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1665395,0.035372924,0.04560864,0.05117387,0.0044069556,0.0014668286,0.0037263387,0.00032069252,0.69138426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965102,0.0033892351,0.006878492,0.0065942835,0.0006257615,0.0007616029,0.0007955503,0.00007746488,0.01577564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8417333,0.08648116,0.015958665,0.0077955835,0.04262746,0.0054038097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4299187,0.43886307,0.058567062,0.0150305675,0.05512613,0.002494447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.095319755,0.00041640713,0.0009837516,0.01239246,0.00219946,0.011727799,0.002421636,0.005873098,0.013827527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43171903,0.0005269942,0.0008705391,0.011352763,0.010554502,0.009358732,0.006740733,0.0044098077,0.0021348526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005443668,0.000109360575,0.06427926,0.0023481182,0.0002032847,0.0020484556,0.0046858615,0.0025997334,0.00043926478,0.67993224,0.09704132,0.14576875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035715618,0.00096489163,0.18068326,0.0116717275,0.0006960529,0.0033791591,0.0110926535,0.015635949,0.006279613,0.17427137,0.5944254,0.0005427699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016662117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01683327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095319755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009408944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007169527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5041051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386442022","doi":"10.1017/s1474745623000034","title":"North–South Trade-Related Technology Diffusion and the East Asia–Latin America Productivity Gap","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Universidad de Chile; Nankai University","keywords":"Total factor productivity; Latin Americans; East Asia; Productivity; Economics; Corporate governance; International trade; Geography; Development economics; Economic geography; International economics; China; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.03617283589381554,"score_gpt":0.21586617260282465,"score_spread":0.1796933367090091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386442022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349129,0.010880515,0.0013535887,0.0027140873,0.000049770933,0.000009594509,0.0010004503,0.000057030287,0.04902198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99459475,0.003056652,0.00026287048,0.00010648809,0.000044345652,0.0000069996718,0.0004174429,0.000008467875,0.0015020279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976367,0.00006585015,0.00001763513,0.000046429515,0.00003995518,0.00006646048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976801,0.0007335284,0.00087065675,0.00010885473,0.00040703802,0.00019981353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009241205,0.00018798964,0.00025932855,0.0017680933,0.00023763596,0.0017217039,0.00015554155,0.00019395389,0.0043473057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002585595,0.00006161416,0.00043587747,0.0033038526,0.0004201853,0.00095962937,0.0009829224,0.00044636702,0.00038248402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002671793,0.00007733467,0.82271177,0.00047615668,0.0006045023,0.00080583355,0.003072323,0.005828127,0.0022923728,0.058418024,0.0048588575,0.10058749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002989104,0.00006038185,0.9476942,0.00035731113,0.00021486645,0.00039824934,0.0055213356,0.003369246,0.0009865136,0.012259851,0.029091032,0.000017077804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01582142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007850171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01582142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065573317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006768945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031458676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386461203","doi":"10.1017/s1474745623000071","title":"Is Using Trade Policy for Foreign Policy a ‘SNO Job’? On Linkage, Friend-Shoring, and the Challenges for Multilateralism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Framing (construction); Commercial policy; Foreign policy; International trade; Sanctions; Psychological intervention; Economic sanctions; Economics; Trade barrier; Linkage (software); Shoring; Intervention (counseling); International economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2337068245928345,"score_gpt":0.3334370736054888,"score_spread":0.09973024901265429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386461203","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003618016,0.52508783,0.0029813184,0.41080204,0.004646229,0.000011218564,0.00007079675,0.00002774578,0.052754886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23456138,0.62852156,0.003059727,0.11106873,0.010417347,0.000065198576,0.00010639179,0.00010656207,0.0120930895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918766,0.00585792,0.00022982339,0.00035063887,0.0012253711,0.00045963426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98452944,0.011575652,0.0010638707,0.00062156847,0.0018396892,0.00036978957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014248575,0.00037643363,0.0009603391,0.0019136482,0.0015064419,0.009303791,0.00088428153,0.0059624338,0.0058269524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015780177,0.00017306524,0.00064719777,0.0031806948,0.008163338,0.010656045,0.001906915,0.006228879,0.0011308031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027064021,0.000017591323,0.00019929979,0.00074125547,0.000031076022,0.00005675408,0.0003383353,0.00073191395,0.000080755104,0.89472204,0.05910179,0.04395207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001849062,0.000039458137,0.0009725126,0.0069855726,0.00004012598,0.000120166944,0.0012848758,0.0005306863,0.00019246808,0.4147407,0.5750452,0.000029650739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051710145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041941125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014248575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004951894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058189994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075354576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390543696","doi":"10.1017/s1474745623000459","title":"Small State Diplomacy in Action: The Real Origins of TPP","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; Diplomacy; Surprise; General partnership; China; State (computer science); Political science; Economy; International trade; Action (physics); Economics; Geography; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1692826626290747,"score_gpt":0.2917000412685183,"score_spread":0.12241737863944357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390543696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032546934,0.021011585,0.0128121395,0.35632342,0.007392027,0.00012820234,0.00030002272,0.00023502679,0.56925064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7683121,0.013080905,0.0052589206,0.092120275,0.001986439,0.00022189268,0.00023672987,0.00019609636,0.11858673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995666,0.0020408414,0.0001487374,0.000525797,0.000898473,0.0007200758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941245,0.0030747585,0.0003808771,0.0004901871,0.001018305,0.00091139576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009549269,0.00027131237,0.00029996474,0.0006697273,0.0020364162,0.007710281,0.0008188187,0.0039263708,0.008468314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014471017,0.0002590787,0.0003718001,0.0013742554,0.0052671796,0.0049876245,0.0050163944,0.009625312,0.0013228176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002705231,0.000035551046,0.00054731226,0.000105516156,0.000009611182,0.000093519855,0.00079470157,0.00023804526,0.00013844385,0.8983646,0.052829795,0.04681584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032868596,0.00006142103,0.0024503025,0.00037809578,0.000009119031,0.00007312015,0.0006850561,0.00041875738,0.0002785631,0.15077338,0.84481895,0.000020340878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00941504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007408324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009549269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004717538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011939601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050502002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402841806","doi":"10.1017/s1474745624000259","title":"Anu Bradford, <i>Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology</i> Oxford University Press, 2023, 599 pages","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Political science; Media studies; Engineering; History; Sociology; Ancient history","score_opus":0.021096656767276525,"score_gpt":0.29081763211773376,"score_spread":0.26972097535045725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402841806","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008603577,0.9309929,0.0001233752,0.04987046,0.012248609,0.0000073947854,0.00015914737,0.000020940055,0.0064911256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038595845,0.9318021,0.0003427697,0.023714524,0.008133788,0.000041329535,0.0003058584,0.000056077683,0.031743973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975351,0.00079488975,0.00018124159,0.00019322583,0.0011275918,0.00016803545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99260545,0.0037102657,0.0004879986,0.00014494975,0.0025271743,0.00052421656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038466034,0.0011539486,0.00089556444,0.0028036986,0.0015140878,0.0036113842,0.0012143898,0.0040684314,0.015156727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010280274,0.0004889209,0.0004229554,0.0039773667,0.001198356,0.005909797,0.0009764498,0.0040672976,0.0077263275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017277376,0.000005916164,0.00007047217,0.0008440348,0.000010521016,0.000015804719,0.00009353672,0.000032840555,0.00004633518,0.0041147037,0.96794975,0.026798807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010135557,0.000008665467,0.00073354796,0.0014194686,0.00001908971,0.000040296112,0.00017272541,0.00002786533,0.000097317636,0.0023749203,0.9950831,0.000012812068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030277701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06577994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030277701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004196027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009569405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060202956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402862748","doi":"10.1017/s1474745624000053","title":"The Rapid Response Labor Mechanism of the US–Mexico–Canada Agreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Agreement; Economics; Political science; Business; Physics; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.032381592413172115,"score_gpt":0.3147802980484082,"score_spread":0.28239870563523606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402862748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08424146,0.23385501,0.003599324,0.10520044,0.0011321192,0.00017791492,0.0007901363,0.000054101685,0.5709495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965066,0.06872506,0.0013319065,0.0064363717,0.00024160954,0.000101474594,0.0001767316,0.000011728111,0.026468553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717474,0.0010614984,0.000067461646,0.00019451973,0.0007893207,0.000712411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983962,0.00063554547,0.00023137018,0.00007022256,0.00056177593,0.000104828156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004193358,0.00014110869,0.00019994445,0.0010767658,0.0025931636,0.0025339506,0.00078425853,0.0013202601,0.0042731394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003249234,0.00009179296,0.00022003059,0.0016451724,0.0037093512,0.00090134627,0.00091583055,0.0011078413,0.00014738538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039835,0.000021801272,0.002547741,0.0005551616,0.000026607542,0.00016495408,0.0023934082,0.0007870435,0.00022755655,0.9124221,0.025580278,0.05523359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026422447,0.000042195094,0.023811124,0.0022688254,0.000036879384,0.00009952394,0.006217809,0.0003524332,0.00046095657,0.028223107,0.9384249,0.000035919245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5758408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5612003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42415923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024325918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030734247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8533144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413226624","doi":"10.1017/s1474745625100992","title":"Recalibration, Shielding and Containment: How the World Trading System De-risks from China and the United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"China; Multilateralism; International trade; Trade war; Economics; Rest (music); Corporate governance; Coercion (linguistics); Global governance; Business; International economics; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02489813412309797,"score_gpt":0.29433882443896986,"score_spread":0.26944069031587187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413226624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17672008,0.19316703,0.0049916,0.13159767,0.0018913723,0.00010845526,0.00008765736,0.00006965744,0.49136645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982845,0.063176,0.0006612454,0.016409662,0.0006780202,0.00004344598,0.000037228645,0.000019109168,0.020690707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973673,0.0013855137,0.00008296615,0.00015386641,0.00060344517,0.0004069966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986286,0.0006594928,0.00013948347,0.00010398719,0.00039768426,0.00007070674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005147036,0.0002366215,0.00023318431,0.0013058659,0.0021972992,0.005595083,0.00062240846,0.0018237534,0.0018841003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031602625,0.00012230397,0.0002681756,0.0010975893,0.0071833096,0.0024455215,0.0013745839,0.0021234096,0.00017273438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037104637,0.000031979,0.0024488315,0.00029104203,0.000044001874,0.00037162364,0.006253871,0.0013176565,0.0006321401,0.84540635,0.025181456,0.11798403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038240814,0.0001990976,0.018492822,0.0020980332,0.00011360555,0.00020979001,0.010092307,0.0016794513,0.0017589659,0.17330363,0.7919497,0.00006445268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04570163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053840455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04570163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049433373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007671234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090871215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413226654","doi":"10.1017/s1474745625101055","title":"How the US Reciprocal Tariff Plan May Save the Global Trading System","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Tariff; Negotiation; Quarter (Canadian coin); International trade; Economics; Plan (archaeology); World trade; International economics; Business; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.07476733828439507,"score_gpt":0.2345835614078468,"score_spread":0.15981622312345173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413226654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0121599585,0.046064157,0.010352537,0.41450405,0.013482776,0.000050094266,0.0006346798,0.00037660488,0.5023751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5916771,0.06698021,0.011463938,0.1520822,0.007265547,0.00013732915,0.0009552663,0.0003459214,0.1690924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978492,0.0008805008,0.00009231358,0.00019116075,0.0007046415,0.00028211958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779236,0.00071344635,0.0001383784,0.00027263985,0.0008987069,0.00018446134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004469409,0.00038671738,0.00028904568,0.0009493283,0.0012853042,0.006989103,0.00062637834,0.0036980552,0.014541167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009773773,0.00014345451,0.0006840025,0.0010242673,0.0018464222,0.0046859104,0.0014927741,0.003696957,0.0030093875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005929644,0.000023061151,0.00024849363,0.000072223,0.000025228013,0.000047869016,0.00010265007,0.0016536472,0.00012645939,0.83979434,0.12020546,0.037641395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026909356,0.000047263165,0.00070353213,0.0003975544,0.00003693025,0.000064021326,0.00024128075,0.00093106827,0.0002748487,0.26239645,0.73484945,0.000030699815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015795136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014481234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015795136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027271046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051323576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04864508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413253568","doi":"10.1017/s1474745625101031","title":"Introduction: Tariff Turbulence: The New US Trade Policy and its Impact on the Global Trading System","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Commercial policy; Free trade; International economics; Liberalization; Industrialisation; Administration (probate law); Revenue; Economics; World trade; International trade; Trade barrier; Business; Market economy; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.03623269576539752,"score_gpt":0.2658322098083138,"score_spread":0.2295995140429163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413253568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00690337,0.44118372,0.0036073457,0.38398847,0.05915759,0.000035241446,0.0043143327,0.00025410613,0.10055578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16844015,0.475585,0.0037432474,0.14478876,0.10868404,0.000104184845,0.0042157965,0.00040190003,0.09403694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947876,0.000099794124,0.00003500275,0.000119543234,0.00021824312,0.000048640966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986129,0.00058101094,0.00021156059,0.00004866636,0.0004536552,0.00009216739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083672634,0.0005263376,0.00031063304,0.0013054326,0.0010542916,0.0046327254,0.0004897059,0.0025042123,0.016083749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00295846,0.00020213173,0.0003597759,0.003742358,0.0013390809,0.003938292,0.0011005837,0.0046215025,0.0040311795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004144482,0.000017041393,0.0010383467,0.00061898085,0.000012756354,0.00006172246,0.0002628537,0.00055448984,0.00025826032,0.11268811,0.8176119,0.066834085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047660355,0.000020385442,0.0032518874,0.0010435431,0.000010901119,0.00013466999,0.00031287113,0.00027049924,0.00013091059,0.031317826,0.9634791,0.000022605744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010690187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009589591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016083749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002655829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019416293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05380547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414614648","doi":"10.1017/s1474745625101079","title":"On the Feasibility, by Means of Customs Duties, of an Entirely (or Almost Entirely) Made-in-the-USA Automobile","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Automotive industry; Tariff; Production (economics); Workforce; Order (exchange); Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law)","score_opus":0.025473606062265088,"score_gpt":0.2786523080997953,"score_spread":0.25317870203753023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414614648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18108733,0.13854487,0.002871791,0.03550656,0.004092653,0.00023338644,0.00030164237,0.000068560475,0.63729334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84261674,0.07836926,0.0021843757,0.010470055,0.000790334,0.000063868196,0.0003156588,0.000030144553,0.065159515],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778545,0.00074368285,0.00009541594,0.00016584752,0.0008287213,0.00038086638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689794,0.0009934233,0.00021081956,0.00020877138,0.0015666218,0.00012236515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040315604,0.00017118393,0.00012549825,0.0006215181,0.00078265497,0.00143066,0.0005902655,0.0019350197,0.0052706935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004831308,0.00008593859,0.00037108726,0.00042782509,0.0009802837,0.0011354322,0.0007031883,0.0014195418,0.0010654122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034734796,0.00033308516,0.004971624,0.0019609062,0.00008768188,0.00062698656,0.0008299366,0.0025098152,0.0061177392,0.28948343,0.09349705,0.59923446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043795942,0.00079241605,0.016740814,0.0023774726,0.00013374502,0.00023959788,0.0015254567,0.0006962061,0.0056588585,0.0059151254,0.96584076,0.000035747995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03260187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04769464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03260187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015832786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004849437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06482422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}