{"meta":{"query_hash":"b31f3673e1e3","filters":{"venue":"Writing Systems Research"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b31f3673e1e3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Writing+Systems+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W2026675477","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2014.943645","title":"Exploring the effects of word features on French immersion children's ability to deconstruct morphologically complex words","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Writing Systems Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognate; Morpheme; Linguistics; Psychology; French; Word lists by frequency; Word (group theory); Second language; Task (project management); French immersion; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10097048811887407,"score_gpt":0.37720282233244207,"score_spread":0.27623233421356796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026675477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853087,0.00015706141,0.00008650459,0.00030468055,0.0008053765,0.0009872462,0.0000055476153,0.000057397614,0.012287479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803877,0.0000069822117,0.0002798479,0.00005988669,0.00033190547,0.00037413032,0.000009827885,0.00002298552,0.00087567326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514484,0.0022432078,0.0005073997,0.0005901346,0.0007969943,0.00071744825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994466,0.0042267446,0.00010220294,0.00081355404,0.00022210261,0.00016941305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005104391,0.0001899009,0.00037203956,0.00031173736,0.00040149596,0.00012532611,0.00063242833,0.00009659829,0.00007892211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001225318,0.00012610287,0.000086856715,0.0006065912,0.00019941635,0.000052018735,0.00019311115,0.00069068803,0.00023844134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044859567,0.0006391828,0.44754308,0.0013574718,0.00031501162,0.00008105743,0.019479934,0.00017092236,0.03501153,0.023712596,0.03984063,0.43139997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040556295,0.00039971233,0.994761,0.0007431029,0.0000042596853,0.000039319937,0.0015759588,0.000016006261,0.00059655716,0.00004543961,0.001258348,0.00015475693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015376194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052175574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5472179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011011359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026618487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5142326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040360702","doi":"10.1093/wsr/wsr010","title":"The role of tone awareness and pinyin knowledge in Chinese reading","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Writing Systems Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pinyin; Psychology; Tone (literature); Phonological awareness; Reading (process); Sentence; Literacy; Linguistics; Developmental psychology; Chinese characters; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.09119085412856248,"score_gpt":0.4446983753686689,"score_spread":0.3535075212401064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040360702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8550898,0.006502751,0.0000056150475,0.000017747627,0.00021746398,0.0002509488,0.0000022465529,0.000019107665,0.13789432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99468416,0.00004635801,0.0000367037,0.0000012295843,0.00010592236,0.00014894415,0.0000016938977,0.000018494902,0.0049565025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769187,0.000834557,0.00045871566,0.00027414152,0.00025556062,0.00048512747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983486,0.000977408,0.00006783971,0.0003374308,0.00019713158,0.000071578586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054574828,0.00009800182,0.0002166472,0.000284829,0.00026016135,0.00006431197,0.00027798762,0.00008353795,0.00002335564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021636259,0.00006744734,0.00002199058,0.0005094214,0.00014597893,0.000054805754,0.0001283413,0.00032543496,0.000059532795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099950295,0.00014468831,0.8659212,0.00021272288,0.000046055306,0.000029398334,0.061201517,4.903405e-7,0.0023133247,0.037959762,0.00034779788,0.031723104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010077369,0.00016341939,0.88977844,0.0015318245,0.000003821258,0.00011131601,0.0848492,0.0007310488,0.00095848425,0.001479198,0.019081516,0.00030397222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059031663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012275943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13959435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005515202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006143921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8923861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575022449","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2016.1227688","title":"Re-evaluating merit: Multiple overlapping factors explain the evolution of numerical notations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Writing Systems Research","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University; Wayne State University","keywords":"Notation; Figure of merit; Positive economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2796496538956741,"score_gpt":0.4711135021424784,"score_spread":0.1914638482468043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575022449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613067,0.00013487173,0.011133226,0.00042711993,0.00015123116,0.0010584537,0.000025585688,0.00006291085,0.025699917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965945,0.0000028449583,0.0025172771,0.0000031842492,0.00015666762,0.00010799785,0.0000037141956,0.000026571532,0.0005872764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966971,0.0005639792,0.000634444,0.00028205058,0.0013434975,0.00047888068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886882,0.00959592,0.00034242246,0.00061023235,0.0006720551,0.00009119643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052775065,0.00014488983,0.00033784346,0.0001249576,0.0018803398,0.0002964455,0.0005792476,0.00007787404,0.000052429867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032187615,0.00010086828,0.00010105737,0.00020651442,0.00027772193,0.00021944594,0.00036806997,0.00039163991,0.000048851183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015649805,0.0017283444,0.19023639,0.0067984182,0.0007704257,0.00005773201,0.04201156,0.0000916133,0.0681511,0.6652361,0.007798339,0.016963454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035008565,0.00069246674,0.18789402,0.011309324,0.00011986956,0.000042632648,0.47640285,0.09344234,0.0123676695,0.21222064,0.0005641093,0.0014432136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012471086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008108938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45301548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026962237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012510337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}