{"meta":{"query_hash":"0f7041c761cd","filters":{"venue":"bepress Legal Series"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0f7041c761cd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=bepress+Legal+Series"},"results":[{"id":"W2220239534","doi":"","title":"Jumping on The Bandwagon: How Canadian Lawyers Can & Should Get Involved in the Emerging Trend to Implement Therapeutic Jurisprudence Practices in Canadian Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"bepress Legal Series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bandwagon effect; Jurisprudence; Law; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.09767643661509175,"score_gpt":0.39108395724819367,"score_spread":0.29340752063310194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220239534","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078262016,0.0030180162,0.0027562683,0.7819015,0.0011180566,0.0001529899,0.00009728247,0.00012185082,0.13257205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456033,0.0025540204,0.0046536904,0.09556292,0.00019971923,0.00011976339,0.00006326713,0.00016823914,0.05107517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96199685,0.011543152,0.0006945277,0.0021189598,0.010342582,0.013303907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96260214,0.009749167,0.0018283402,0.0009964337,0.013005542,0.011818417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024973033,0.00055817026,0.0006381773,0.002524991,0.08442458,0.028034,0.005128469,0.019668216,0.017547462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068311326,0.00090357295,0.0007962662,0.0040407865,0.03863145,0.011963465,0.010172773,0.020692116,0.0015136868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010508906,0.00018553152,0.011345682,0.0002601103,0.000046431956,0.0014052073,0.28026336,0.00073534064,0.0010519801,0.34828976,0.24763583,0.10867564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086257576,0.00007492237,0.021999352,0.00076953456,0.000092954644,0.00026651833,0.30284768,0.0013644735,0.0005909757,0.044121757,0.6273638,0.00042172402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99601644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19113038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19113038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43014637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9381741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123102182","doi":"","title":"The Legal Status of “Dump & Sue”: Should Plaintiffs and their Attorneys be Prohibited from Trading the Stock of Companies they Sue? – a Law and Economics Approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"bepress Legal Series","topic":"Securities Regulation and Market Practices","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Lawsuit; Business; Shareholder; Law; Securities fraud; Insider; Fiduciary; Corporation; Law and economics; Supreme court; Economics; Finance; Duty; Corporate governance; Political science","score_opus":0.031555651059809356,"score_gpt":0.23280272307848343,"score_spread":0.2012470720186741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123102182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07709788,0.014059761,0.027040476,0.38050488,0.0017860435,0.0001963657,0.00024524514,0.00009975455,0.49896958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91135013,0.0039221984,0.0065300474,0.045410383,0.004166452,0.00029556308,0.00007945699,0.000051385065,0.028194344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98296136,0.0057161706,0.0011300708,0.0027476945,0.004425334,0.0030193615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545533,0.032472234,0.0040919185,0.002713214,0.004429536,0.0017397485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025151568,0.0005872323,0.0013811055,0.0026961954,0.009255102,0.017934192,0.004379531,0.04115493,0.0065102223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04586304,0.0010599046,0.0014345407,0.0013546409,0.045197822,0.017982125,0.004599888,0.0180939,0.0010414723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104312485,0.00003443808,0.0007337715,0.000026153897,0.000007702736,0.00026829573,0.00068494404,0.00011243349,0.00010387376,0.99130005,0.0040855724,0.0026324184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057432797,0.00007294192,0.002847185,0.0007193962,0.00005720125,0.0005987755,0.002315203,0.0022194218,0.000588582,0.937433,0.052982174,0.000108578715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019993667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012599539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04115493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009182737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012765935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13301581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123877430","doi":"10.7939/r37m04f2p","title":"Shareholders, Creditors, and Directors’ Fiduciary Duties: A Law and Finance Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"bepress Legal Series","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Creditor; Shareholder; Business; Corporation; Insolvency; Debt; Accounting; Incentive; Finance; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Corporate finance; Value (mathematics); Enterprise value; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Duty; Market economy","score_opus":0.009557491252638427,"score_gpt":0.17568635589062756,"score_spread":0.16612886463798912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123877430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07631167,0.033017125,0.1729668,0.113371834,0.00089291757,0.00010410485,0.00012810162,0.000058704085,0.6031487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94252414,0.00853931,0.012593554,0.007455488,0.0019774397,0.00014944252,0.00003959383,0.000030544838,0.026690448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590486,0.0019398367,0.0001732095,0.00052455446,0.00083119224,0.0006264393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909541,0.0065272423,0.0009650512,0.0005551,0.0006231272,0.00037540533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007396454,0.00058830535,0.0006650777,0.0026852372,0.0040905788,0.008802406,0.00171127,0.009158686,0.004978144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012473496,0.0004969463,0.00077400275,0.0017306299,0.02504902,0.0128872795,0.0033850523,0.006813725,0.00055048516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018642443,0.000005904076,0.00011747633,0.0000047332037,0.0000010673455,0.000023123683,0.00012144992,0.0001717383,0.00001731882,0.9979668,0.0004129153,0.0011555774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012254813,0.000017614477,0.0005162363,0.00010170516,0.000007217869,0.00006539369,0.0002581223,0.0017866639,0.00010562802,0.97786725,0.019248923,0.000013027004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007565797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051760017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009158686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064026625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039611505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046454728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}