{"meta":{"query_hash":"0f7041c761cd","filters":{"venue":"bepress Legal Series"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0f7041c761cd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=bepress+Legal+Series"},"results":[{"id":"W2220239534","doi":"","title":"Jumping on The Bandwagon: How Canadian Lawyers Can & Should Get Involved in the Emerging Trend to Implement Therapeutic Jurisprudence Practices in Canadian Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"bepress Legal Series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bandwagon effect; Jurisprudence; Law; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.09767643661509175,"score_gpt":0.39108395724819367,"score_spread":0.29340752063310194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220239534","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22289287,0.00013122424,0.000001233973,0.72601026,0.00037105748,0.00055244187,0.00003759656,0.000016598611,0.049986716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842539,0.00003026308,0.000025122352,0.0136461435,0.00025353715,0.00019127205,0.000020377469,0.000011834773,0.001567558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775636,0.00056939665,0.00023621056,0.0002660221,0.0004459037,0.0007261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876976,0.0004790496,0.00017344681,0.0002924222,0.00008279149,0.00020254796],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019405806,0.00015297702,0.0001246964,0.00033480668,0.0012454311,0.0011906363,0.0005754221,0.0000789297,0.00024673736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006184264,0.00011283382,0.000031206928,0.0010857852,0.00012249804,0.0010919574,0.00001762119,0.00051298254,0.000006171897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041038445,0.0000807144,0.07664138,0.000009794343,0.000025169777,0.00004980177,0.14107783,0.00045456225,0.00006077458,0.73154163,0.047267243,0.0027500691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007453091,0.000019553589,0.05183489,0.000019289319,0.000008835987,0.0000012110162,0.05094791,0.000020736596,0.00004355109,0.0005512163,0.89632696,0.0001513361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8490597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068793976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029027057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123102182","doi":"","title":"The Legal Status of “Dump & Sue”: Should Plaintiffs and their Attorneys be Prohibited from Trading the Stock of Companies they Sue? – a Law and Economics Approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"bepress Legal Series","topic":"Securities Regulation and Market Practices","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Lawsuit; Business; Shareholder; Law; Securities fraud; Insider; Fiduciary; Corporation; Law and economics; Supreme court; Economics; Finance; Duty; Corporate governance; Political science","score_opus":0.031555651059809356,"score_gpt":0.23280272307848343,"score_spread":0.2012470720186741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123102182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96295285,0.0019071768,0.000030243898,0.0021299503,0.00011249824,0.00040357036,0.00005965082,0.00004281351,0.032361224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853325,0.00028126902,0.0001364642,0.00041895662,0.00030940498,0.000023876313,0.000038932278,0.000022376777,0.00023544127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989668,0.00005377516,0.00034306783,0.00023204066,0.0001288946,0.00027543528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888396,0.00039012276,0.0003647721,0.00026207868,0.00007995966,0.000019084295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003518132,0.00020056876,0.00028600436,0.00004993466,0.0004567472,0.00072256196,0.00022791974,0.00006242487,0.000031924847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006872203,0.00012131523,0.00005752779,0.000073788935,0.0005617579,0.0025274814,0.00023207978,0.00015108485,3.0512734e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096668856,0.000120322155,0.0060908925,0.00024460698,0.00029070213,6.433878e-7,0.0066284845,0.00042090422,0.0005737894,0.9755088,0.00084396754,0.008310177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071636314,0.00002210244,0.014731986,0.000034580542,0.00009154965,0.0000051694183,0.011674168,0.028316746,0.00081100786,0.0018280189,0.9415223,0.00024600138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009986035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093233595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012465161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019877949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123877430","doi":"10.7939/r37m04f2p","title":"Shareholders, Creditors, and Directors’ Fiduciary Duties: A Law and Finance Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"bepress Legal Series","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Creditor; Shareholder; Business; Corporation; Insolvency; Debt; Accounting; Incentive; Finance; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Corporate finance; Value (mathematics); Enterprise value; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Duty; Market economy","score_opus":0.009557491252638427,"score_gpt":0.17568635589062756,"score_spread":0.16612886463798912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123877430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8518596,0.010469842,0.00006842603,0.0011283114,0.001224606,0.0003898063,0.00007720423,0.00028724535,0.13449495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948314,0.00009564115,0.0002311624,0.0004724963,0.0024862348,0.00003486707,0.00004437726,0.000021252175,0.001782575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905366,0.000006538513,0.0001798082,0.00035413905,0.00016945293,0.00023641645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995997,0.000020343954,0.0001437689,0.00018095499,0.00004794143,0.0000073048063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008544944,0.00019615791,0.00020151878,0.00003913933,0.00029672805,0.00049964496,0.0001285961,0.000072385286,0.000023885596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019732837,0.00018435337,0.00003257096,0.00015267241,0.00022348373,0.0026140867,0.0001835424,0.00011409337,0.0000048273764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017384086,0.00016368902,0.03324837,0.00059157034,0.000026652628,0.000057400543,0.00016345126,0.00016932134,0.00022603982,0.8724107,0.09055569,0.00221325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030781137,0.000010699471,0.065067515,0.000062297724,0.000024642984,0.000009452799,0.000079482095,0.00063498516,0.00015447481,0.008157204,0.92515916,0.0003322606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010403278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010293369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008588844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008519067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99618655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}